<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss-style.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Team IT Security - 📰 Alle Kategorien]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[https://tsecurity.de/export/rss/alle-kategorien.xml?q=collection+framework%2F]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Das Gesamte Cyber Threat Intelligence Feed-Archiv von TSecurity.de. Alle Nachrichten, Sicherheitsmeldungen, Videos, Downloads und Analysen in einer zentralen Übersicht.]]></description>
<language>de-DE</language>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 06:13:38 +0200</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 06:13:38 +0200</pubDate>
<ttl>15</ttl>
<copyright>2026 Team IT Security</copyright>
<managingEditor>lakandor@tsecurity.de (Horus Sirius)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>lakandor@tsecurity.de (Horus Sirius)</webMaster>
<category>IT Security</category>
<category>Cybersecurity</category>
<category>Nachrichten</category>
<generator>Team IT Security RSS Generator v2.0</generator>

<atom:link href="https://tsecurity.de/export/rss/it-security.xml?q=collection+framework%2F" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
<title><![CDATA[SECURITY AFFAIRS MALWARE NEWSLETTER ROUND 107]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Security Affairs Malware newsletter includes a collection of the best articles and research on malware in the international landscape Malware Newsletter UAC-0145 Primary Compromise Vectors as of July 2026   SleeperGem: Compromised git_credential_manager, Dendreo, and fastlane RubyGems Drop a Pers...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695725/it-security-nachrichten/security-affairs-malware-newsletter-round-107/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695725/it-security-nachrichten/security-affairs-malware-newsletter-round-107/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 16:17:01 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Security Affairs Malware newsletter includes a collection of the best articles and research on malware in the international landscape Malware Newsletter UAC-0145 Primary Compromise Vectors as of July 2026   SleeperGem: Compromised git_credential_manager, Dendreo, and fastlane RubyGems Drop a Persistent Backdoor   AgentBaiting: How 800+ Fake AI Skills and MCP Servers Delivered Malware   Chaos ransomware’s msaRAT: Living […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[SECURITY AFFAIRS MALWARE NEWSLETTER ROUND 107]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Security Affairs Malware newsletter includes a collection of the best articles and research on malware in the international landscape Malware Newsletter UAC-0145 Primary Compromise Vectors as of July 2026   SleeperGem: Compromised git_credential_manager, Dendreo, and fastlane RubyGems Drop a Pers...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695709/hacking/security-affairs-malware-newsletter-round-107/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695709/hacking/security-affairs-malware-newsletter-round-107/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 16:05:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Security Affairs Malware newsletter includes a collection of the best articles and research on malware in the international landscape Malware Newsletter UAC-0145 Primary Compromise Vectors as of July 2026   SleeperGem: Compromised git_credential_manager, Dendreo, and fastlane RubyGems Drop a Persistent Backdoor   AgentBaiting: How 800+ Fake AI Skills and MCP Servers Delivered Malware   Chaos ransomware’s msaRAT: Living […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[FAIRChem v2 UMA for Multidomain Atomistic Simulation across Molecules, Catalysts, Materials, Vibrations, and Molecular Dynamics]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In this tutorial, we explore FAIRChem v2 and the UMA universal machine-learning interatomic potential as a unified framework for atomistic simulation across molecular chemistry, catalysis, and inorganic materials. We configure an environment, authenticate with Hugging Face to access the gated UMA...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695386/ai-nachrichten/fairchem-v2-uma-for-multidomain-atomistic-simulation-across-molecules-catalysts-materials-vibrations-and-molecular-dynamics/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695386/ai-nachrichten/fairchem-v2-uma-for-multidomain-atomistic-simulation-across-molecules-catalysts-materials-vibrations-and-molecular-dynamics/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 10:53:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this tutorial, we explore FAIRChem v2 and the UMA universal machine-learning interatomic potential as a unified framework for atomistic simulation across molecular chemistry, catalysis, and inorganic materials. We configure an environment, authenticate with Hugging Face to access the gated UMA model weights, and initialize task-specific calculators for the omol, oc20, and omat domains. We […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.marktechpost.com/2026/07/26/fairchem-v2-uma-for-multidomain-atomistic-simulation-across-molecules-catalysts-materials-vibrations-and-molecular-dynamics/">FAIRChem v2 UMA for Multidomain Atomistic Simulation across Molecules, Catalysts, Materials, Vibrations, and Molecular Dynamics</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.marktechpost.com/">MarkTechPost</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Week in review: ServiceNow pre-auth RCE exploited in the wild, Hugging Face breached]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Here’s an overview of some of last week’s most interesting news, articles, interviews and videos: AI agents are still logging in as humans Most large companies run more than one AI platform at the same time. Developers pull up coding assistants, marketing teams lean on writing tools, and analysts...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695324/it-security-nachrichten/week-in-review-servicenow-pre-auth-rce-exploited-in-the-wild-hugging-face-breached/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695324/it-security-nachrichten/week-in-review-servicenow-pre-auth-rce-exploited-in-the-wild-hugging-face-breached/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 10:02:10 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s an overview of some of last week’s most interesting news, articles, interviews and videos: AI agents are still logging in as humans Most large companies run more than one AI platform at the same time. Developers pull up coding assistants, marketing teams lean on writing tools, and analysts query enterprise search across separate vendors. Single-provider setups keep giving way to mixed stacks as companies keep their options open. PR3TACK preemptive framework maps threats before … <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/07/26/week-in-review-servicenow-pre-auth-rce-exploited-in-the-wild-hugging-face-breached/" rel="nofollow">More <span class="meta-nav">→</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/07/26/week-in-review-servicenow-pre-auth-rce-exploited-in-the-wild-hugging-face-breached/">Week in review: ServiceNow pre-auth RCE exploited in the wild, Hugging Face breached</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/">Help Net Security</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Building Self-Evolving AI Agents with OpenSpace Using Skills, MCP, Lineage, and Low-Cost Reuse]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Discover how to create self-evolving AI agents using the OpenSpace framework. This tutorial guides you through the entire workflow—from environment setup and custom skill creation to MCP integration and using SQLite to manage agent lineage—empowering you to build more efficient, reusable agent sy...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694704/ai-nachrichten/building-self-evolving-ai-agents-with-openspace-using-skills-mcp-lineage-and-low-cost-reuse/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694704/ai-nachrichten/building-self-evolving-ai-agents-with-openspace-using-skills-mcp-lineage-and-low-cost-reuse/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:49:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Discover how to create self-evolving AI agents using the OpenSpace framework. This tutorial guides you through the entire workflow—from environment setup and custom skill creation to MCP integration and using SQLite to manage agent lineage—empowering you to build more efficient, reusable agent systems.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.marktechpost.com/2026/07/25/building-self-evolving-ai-agents-with-openspace-using-skills-mcp-lineage-and-low-cost-reuse/">Building Self-Evolving AI Agents with OpenSpace Using Skills, MCP, Lineage, and Low-Cost Reuse</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.marktechpost.com/">MarkTechPost</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[GoSerpent: a persistent threat evolves with sophisticated data collection and exfiltration]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Two-phase attacks with the GoSerpent backdoor, Stowaway RAT, ThumbcacheService and other tools aim to steal data from government entities in Southeast Asia.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694636/malware-trojaner-viren/goserpent-a-persistent-threat-evolves-with-sophisticated-data-collection-and-exfiltration/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694636/malware-trojaner-viren/goserpent-a-persistent-threat-evolves-with-sophisticated-data-collection-and-exfiltration/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:04:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>⚠️ Malware / Trojaner / Viren</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Two-phase attacks with the GoSerpent backdoor, Stowaway RAT, ThumbcacheService and other tools aim to steal data from government entities in Southeast Asia.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OkoBot: new sophisticated malware framework targets cryptocurrency users]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Kaspersky GReAT experts dissect the new OkoBot campaign targeting cryptocurrency users. This complex framework employs TookPS, exfiltrates seed phrases, monitors Chromium-based browsers, and installs various malware strains, including the Rilide stealer.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694637/malware-trojaner-viren/okobot-new-sophisticated-malware-framework-targets-cryptocurrency-users/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694637/malware-trojaner-viren/okobot-new-sophisticated-malware-framework-targets-cryptocurrency-users/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:04:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>⚠️ Malware / Trojaner / Viren</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Kaspersky GReAT experts dissect the new OkoBot campaign targeting cryptocurrency users. This complex framework employs TookPS, exfiltrates seed phrases, monitors Chromium-based browsers, and installs various malware strains, including the Rilide stealer.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The June 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I’ve made it through Pwn2Own Berlin, had a little vacation, and now I’m back for Patch Tuesday. Microsoft and Adobe didn’t disappoint. In fact, they have heralded my return with the largest Patch Tuesday release ever. Thanks? Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694563/hacking/the-june-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694563/hacking/the-june-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I’ve made it through Pwn2Own Berlin, had a little vacation, and now I’m back for Patch Tuesday. Microsoft and Adobe didn’t disappoint. In fact, they have heralded my return with the largest Patch Tuesday release ever. Thanks? Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for June 2026</strong></p><p class="">For June, Adobe released 11 bulletins addressing 123 unique CVEs in Adobe Acrobat Reader, ColdFusion, Experience Manager, Experience Manager Forms, InDesign, InCopy, Substance 3D Sampler, Content Credentials SDK, Dreamweaver, Format Plugins, and Adobe Campaign Classic. A total of 11 of these CVEs were reported through the ZDI program.</p><p class="">Here’s this month’s overview table:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/campaign/apsb26-66.html" target="_blank">APSB26-66</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Campaign Classic</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>10.0</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-64.html" target="_blank">APSB26-64</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>7</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-63.html" target="_blank">APSB26-63</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Acrobat Reader</td>
    <td>20</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/aem-forms/apsb26-57.html" target="_blank">APSB26-57</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager Forms</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dreamweaver/apsb26-62.html" target="_blank">APSB26-62</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Dreamweaver</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/formatplugins/apsb26-65.html" target="_blank">APSB26-65</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Format Plugins</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/incopy/apsb26-59.html" target="_blank">APSB26-59</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InCopy</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/indesign/apsb26-58.html" target="_blank">APSB26-58</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InDesign</td>
    <td>12</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d-sampler/apsb26-60.html" target="_blank">APSB26-60</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Substance 3D Sampler</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/content-authenticity-sdk/apsb26-61.html" target="_blank">APSB26-61</a></td>
    <td>Content Credentials SDK</td>
    <td>8</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.5</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-56.html" target="_blank">APSB26-56</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager</td>
    <td>57</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>5.4</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
  <tr>
    <td>TOTAL</td>
    <td>11 bulletins</td>
    <td>123</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</tfoot>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">Obviously, the update for Campaign Classic should be on the top of your deployment list if you’re a user. A CVSS 10 is rare; two in the same bulletin is pretty much a unicorn. Adobe says there are no active attacks, but I would expect heavy research into creating one. The update for Coldfusion is also a Priority 1, but again, no known attacks is the wild. I suspect the Reader patch will also receive a lot of attention as malicious PDFs are common in ransomware attacks. The update for Experience Manager may be large, but it’s mostly just cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for June 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released a new record 208 CVEs Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Github Copilot, Defender, Exchange Server, Hyper-V, Secure Boot, and BitLocker. At least, that’s my count. Microsoft’s tools seem to be having some issues, as they initially included a CVE from 2020 in this release. Regardless, the count is over 200, and I counted several times.</p><p class="">One of these bugs came through the ZDI program, but bugs submitted during Pwn2Own Berlin remain unpatched. If you include the Chromium and other third-party bugs, the total CVE count for June comes to a staggering 571 CVEs. 38 of these cases are rated Critical while the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">I’ve been counting CVEs on Patch Tuesday since 2017, and this is by far the largest monthly release in that time. The previous record was 177 set last year. It is extraordinary that Microsoft can produce so many patches in a single month, but it does raise concerns. How many of these cases were found using AI tools? How many patches were generated using AI to assist in coding or testing? What quality issues may exist in these patches? And likely most importantly, is this the new normal? The last two months were also large releases. Should sysadmins adjust their processes for prioritization and patch deployment based on this new volume of updates? Unfortunately, Microsoft is not providing those answers right now. Hopefully that changes in the future. BTW – just a note – the current number of CVEs shipped by Microsoft this year exceeds the total number of CVEs shipped in all of 2018.</p><p class="">One of the bugs patched by Microsoft this month is listed as under active exploitation and three others are listed as publicly known at the time of release. Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bug being exploited in the wild.</p><p class="">-   <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41091"><strong>CVE-2026-41091</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>Since Microsoft doesn’t provide info on how widespread exploitation is, we must read some tea leaves. For this patch, several different people were acknowledged, which indicates multiple parties say this is in the wild, meaning exploitation is likely significant. The good news is that most people won’t need to take action as Defender updates itself. However, if you don’t have this configured or are in an isolated environment, you’ll need to update to the latest version.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45657"><strong>CVE-2026-45657</strong></a><strong> - Windows Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This CVSS 9.8 bug allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to execute code at SYSTEM level without user interaction. Yup – this is wormable. The problem lies in the way the kernel handles TCP/IP. This was listed as “Exploitation Less Likely” by Microsoft, but rest assured that every researcher and bug shop on the planet is reversing this patch right now trying to create an exploit. Test and deploy this patch quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47291"><strong>CVE-2026-47291</strong></a><strong> - HTTP.sys Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Our second CVSS 9.8 bug of the month, this also allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to execute code on affected systems without user interaction. However, there is a caveat. Systems using the default MaxRequestBytes registry value used by the Windows HTTP stack are not affected by this bug. You can edit your registry settings if you need protection while you test and deploy the patch. The bulletin includes instructions and even a PowerShell script for doing this action. Microsoft lists this as “Exploitation more likely”, so I would definitely check your registry settings.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44815"><strong>CVE-2026-44815</strong></a><strong> - DHCP Client Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Here’s another CVSS 9.8 that has an odd incongruity. Although the CVSS says no permissions are required for exploitation, the write-up states it must be an “authenticated” user. I would err on the side of caution here and believe the CVSS. If that’s correct, then we have another bug where a remote, unauthenticated attacker could execute code on affected systems without user interaction. And since the DHCP client is on every OS, it’s a juicy target. This is another one to test and deploy with haste.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45585"><strong>CVE-2026-45585</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50507"><strong>CVE-2026-50507</strong></a><strong> - Windows BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<br></strong>If you’ve followed the ongoing saga of Nightmare Eclipse vs. MSRC, the bugs should look familiar. One is definitely a fix for “YellowKey”, while the other appears to be a fix for “GreenPlasma”. The researcher has promised a “<a href="https://www.theregister.com/security/2026/05/28/microsoft-0-day-feud-escalates-as-researcher-threatens-another-windows-exploit-dump/5248085">bone shattering</a>” drop on June 14, so let’s hope Microsoft is able to reach some understanding with the researcher before more 0-days are released. Also, there is a script provided by Microsoft as a mitigation, but the better strategy is to test and deploy the updates.</p><p class=""> Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for June 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="new2026-Jun-cvrf2.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="1024">
 <col width="144">
 <col width="256">
 <col width="104" span="6">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="144" class="xl65" height="47">CVE</td>
  <td width="256" class="xl65">Title</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Severity</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">CVSS</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Public</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Exploited</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">XI</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Type</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41091"><span>CVE-2026-41091</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Defender
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">0</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49160"><span>CVE-2026-49160</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">HTTP.sys Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50507"><span>CVE-2026-50507</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45586"><span>CVE-2026-45586</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Collaborative
  Translation Framework (CTFMON) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="91">
  <td class="xl67" height="91"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-10263"><span>CVE-2025-10263 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">ARM: CVE-2025-10263
  Completion of affected memory accesses might not be guaranteed by completion
  of a TLBI [kernel]</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48567"><span>CVE-2026-48567</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure HorizonDB<span>  </span>Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">10</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32193"><span>CVE-2026-32193</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure Kubernetes
  Service (AKS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47644"><span>CVE-2026-47644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Copilot Chat
  (Microsoft Edge) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44815"><span>CVE-2026-44815</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">DHCP Client Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47291"><span>CVE-2026-47291</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">HTTP.sys Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42824"><span>CVE-2026-42824</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">M365 Copilot
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45476"><span>CVE-2026-45476</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Azure
  Network Adapter Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44810"><span>CVE-2026-44810</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft
  Cryptographic Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48579"><span>CVE-2026-48579</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Online Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47655"><span>CVE-2026-47655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Graph
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45497"><span>CVE-2026-45497</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft M365 Copilot
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45460"><span>CVE-2026-45460</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45472"><span>CVE-2026-45472</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45474"><span>CVE-2026-45474</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45461"><span>CVE-2026-45461</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45463"><span>CVE-2026-45463</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45456"><span>CVE-2026-45456</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Outlook and
  Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45458"><span>CVE-2026-45458</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Outlook and
  Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47635"><span>CVE-2026-47635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Outlook and
  Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26142"><span>CVE-2026-26142</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Nuance PowerScribe
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47289"><span>CVE-2026-47289</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47654"><span>CVE-2026-47654</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48563"><span>CVE-2026-48563</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42992"><span>CVE-2026-42992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44799"><span>CVE-2026-44799</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44801"><span>CVE-2026-44801</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42985"><span>CVE-2026-42985</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45648"><span>CVE-2026-45648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42987"><span>CVE-2026-42987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Deployment
  Services (WDS) Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33828"><span>CVE-2026-33828</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Device Health
  Attestation (DHA) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44803"><span>CVE-2026-44803</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44812"><span>CVE-2026-44812</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45607"><span>CVE-2026-45607</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45641"><span>CVE-2026-45641</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47652"><span>CVE-2026-47652</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47288"><span>CVE-2026-47288</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kerberos Key
  Distribution Center (KDC) Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45657"><span>CVE-2026-45657</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48574"><span>CVE-2026-48574</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45490"><span>CVE-2026-45490</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">.NET SDK Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45491"><span>CVE-2026-45491</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">.NET Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45591"><span>CVE-2026-45591</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">ASP.NET Core Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47643"><span>CVE-2026-47643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure Stack Edge
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41098"><span>CVE-2026-41098</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure Stack Edge
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45642"><span>CVE-2026-45642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Azure
  Attestation service and Device Health Attestation Service Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45650"><span>CVE-2026-45650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Bing Search
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45637"><span>CVE-2026-45637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45647"><span>CVE-2026-45647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40371"><span>CVE-2026-40371</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  (on-premises) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44822"><span>CVE-2026-44822</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45455"><span>CVE-2026-45455</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45469"><span>CVE-2026-45469</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44817"><span>CVE-2026-44817</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44818"><span>CVE-2026-44818</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44820"><span>CVE-2026-44820</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44823"><span>CVE-2026-44823</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45459"><span>CVE-2026-45459</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45504"><span>CVE-2026-45504</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45502"><span>CVE-2026-45502</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45503"><span>CVE-2026-45503</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45583"><span>CVE-2026-45583</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45500"><span>CVE-2026-45500</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45501"><span>CVE-2026-45501</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47631"><span>CVE-2026-47631</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42986"><span>CVE-2026-42986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Graphics
  Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41092"><span>CVE-2026-41092</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Kinect
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45644"><span>CVE-2026-45644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Live Share
  Canvas SDK Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47293"><span>CVE-2026-47293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45485"><span>CVE-2026-45485</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44821"><span>CVE-2026-44821</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45483"><span>CVE-2026-45483</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Project Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45475"><span>CVE-2026-45475</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44819"><span>CVE-2026-44819</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44824"><span>CVE-2026-44824</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45645"><span>CVE-2026-45645</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49161"><span>CVE-2026-49161</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft PC Manager
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42902"><span>CVE-2026-42902</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft PowerToys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45484"><span>CVE-2026-45484</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45454"><span>CVE-2026-45454</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47298"><span>CVE-2026-47298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45467"><span>CVE-2026-45467</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45468"><span>CVE-2026-45468</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45479"><span>CVE-2026-45479</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45453"><span>CVE-2026-45453</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47636"><span>CVE-2026-47636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47637"><span>CVE-2026-47637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47638"><span>CVE-2026-47638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47639"><span>CVE-2026-47639</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47641"><span>CVE-2026-47641</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33113"><span>CVE-2026-33113</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45462"><span>CVE-2026-45462</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45464"><span>CVE-2026-45464</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45465"><span>CVE-2026-45465</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47634"><span>CVE-2026-47634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47640"><span>CVE-2026-47640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45481"><span>CVE-2026-45481</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48560"><span>CVE-2026-48560</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48562"><span>CVE-2026-48562</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42835"><span>CVE-2026-42835</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Teams for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45606"><span>CVE-2026-45606</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft UxTheme
  Library (uxtheme.dll) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45482"><span>CVE-2026-45482</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Visual
  Studio Code CoPilot Chat Extension Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45466"><span>CVE-2026-45466</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45471"><span>CVE-2026-45471</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45486"><span>CVE-2026-45486</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45643"><span>CVE-2026-45643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45457"><span>CVE-2026-45457</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42980"><span>CVE-2026-42980</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">NT OS Kernel Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42916"><span>CVE-2026-42916</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">NT OS Kernel Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45649"><span>CVE-2026-45649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Office for Android
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47653"><span>CVE-2026-47653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42909"><span>CVE-2026-42909</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42913"><span>CVE-2026-42913</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42993"><span>CVE-2026-42993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45588"><span>CVE-2026-45588</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48568"><span>CVE-2026-48568</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48570"><span>CVE-2026-48570</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48573"><span>CVE-2026-48573</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48575"><span>CVE-2026-48575</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48576"><span>CVE-2026-48576</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48578"><span>CVE-2026-48578</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45654"><span>CVE-2026-45654</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45656"><span>CVE-2026-45656</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">UEFI Secure Boot
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-8863"><span>CVE-2026-8863</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">UEFI Secure Boot
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40376"><span>CVE-2026-40376</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47281"><span>CVE-2026-47281</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47284"><span>CVE-2026-47284</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47292"><span>CVE-2026-47292</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  MSSQL Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48569"><span>CVE-2026-48569</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47287"><span>CVE-2026-47287</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42829"><span>CVE-2026-42829</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Administrator
  Protection Secure Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34335"><span>CVE-2026-34335</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45601"><span>CVE-2026-45601</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45598"><span>CVE-2026-45598</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45596"><span>CVE-2026-45596</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45638"><span>CVE-2026-45638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45603"><span>CVE-2026-45603</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42911"><span>CVE-2026-42911</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45594"><span>CVE-2026-45594</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Application
  Identity (AppID) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45655"><span>CVE-2026-45655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45658"><span>CVE-2026-45658</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45640"><span>CVE-2026-45640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Bluetooth Port
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45605"><span>CVE-2026-45605</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Bluetooth
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47656"><span>CVE-2026-47656</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Boot Manager
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44809"><span>CVE-2026-44809</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45634"><span>CVE-2026-45634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DHCP Client
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45608"><span>CVE-2026-45608</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DHCP Client
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41108"><span>CVE-2026-41108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42905"><span>CVE-2026-42905</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44811"><span>CVE-2026-44811</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44808"><span>CVE-2026-44808</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44807"><span>CVE-2026-44807</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42983"><span>CVE-2026-42983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44802"><span>CVE-2026-44802</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44813"><span>CVE-2026-44813</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44804"><span>CVE-2026-44804</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48566"><span>CVE-2026-48566</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44814"><span>CVE-2026-44814</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45602"><span>CVE-2026-45602</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Dynamic Host
  Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42836"><span>CVE-2026-42836</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Function
  Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42910"><span>CVE-2026-42910</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hotpatch
  Monitoring Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42972"><span>CVE-2026-42972</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45592"><span>CVE-2026-45592</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Internet
  (wininet.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42903"><span>CVE-2026-42903</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kerberos
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42914"><span>CVE-2026-42914</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kerberos
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48583"><span>CVE-2026-48583</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45653"><span>CVE-2026-45653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42984"><span>CVE-2026-42984</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45600"><span>CVE-2026-45600</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45604"><span>CVE-2026-45604</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Managed
  Installer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45595"><span>CVE-2026-45595</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Mark of the
  Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45636"><span>CVE-2026-45636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50508"><span>CVE-2026-50508</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows NTLM Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48565"><span>CVE-2026-48565</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Narrator
  Braille Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44805"><span>CVE-2026-44805</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Network
  Controller (NC) Host Agent Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42981"><span>CVE-2026-42981</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Performance
  Monitor Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42974"><span>CVE-2026-42974</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Performance
  Monitor Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45487"><span>CVE-2026-45487</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Program
  Compatibility Assistant Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42828"><span>CVE-2026-42828</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42837"><span>CVE-2026-42837</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42969"><span>CVE-2026-42969</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42971"><span>CVE-2026-42971</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42970"><span>CVE-2026-42970</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42973"><span>CVE-2026-42973</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42978"><span>CVE-2026-42978</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42977"><span>CVE-2026-42977</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42979"><span>CVE-2026-42979</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42991"><span>CVE-2026-42991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45639"><span>CVE-2026-45639</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42908"><span>CVE-2026-42908</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45593"><span>CVE-2026-45593</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows SDK Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42906"><span>CVE-2026-42906</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Shell
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42907"><span>CVE-2026-42907</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Shell
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47648"><span>CVE-2026-47648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Storage
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42915"><span>CVE-2026-42915</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42904"><span>CVE-2026-42904</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42968"><span>CVE-2026-42968</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Telephony
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42912"><span>CVE-2026-42912</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Telephony
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45597"><span>CVE-2026-45597</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows UI Automation
  Manager (uiamanager.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45599"><span>CVE-2026-45599</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows UPnP Device
  Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45635"><span>CVE-2026-45635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows UPnP Device
  Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40409"><span>CVE-2026-40409</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40404"><span>CVE-2026-40404</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42989"><span>CVE-2026-42989</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Winlogon
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="144"></td>
  <td width="256"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this release, the scariest-looking one is actually nothing to concern yourself with at all. The CVSS 10 bug in Azure HorizonDB has already been addressed by Microsoft and is just being documented now. That’s also the case for five others. Of course, there wouldn’t be a release without Office bugs that have the Preview Pane as an attack vector. There are multiple in June. There’s a handful of bugs in the Remote Desktop Client, but these rely on connecting to a malicious RDP server. There are three patches for Hyper-V that allow for guest-to-host code execution. The bug in Active Directory requires authentication, but any authenticated user can hit it. For the Windows Directory Service vulnerability, it needs to be listening for TFTP. You have blocked that everywhere, right? The bug in Azure Network Adapter is somewhat unique as you need to update your Linux kernel to be protected. The bug in Azure Kubernetes allows an attacker to break out of a container and gain control of the AKS worker node. Finally, the bug in the Kerberos Key Distribution Center (KDC) seems unlikely, but if exploited, it could allow authenticated attackers to get code execution on affected systems.</p><p class="">Moving on to the other code execution bugs, there are the ubiquitous open-an-own bugs in Office components like Excel and Word. The code injection bug in Exchange Server looks troubling, but it requires a machine-in-the-middle (MiTM), so exploitation is unlikely. The bugs in SharePoint require authentication, but you should note that the patch applies to both SharePoint Server 2016 and SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016. The two bugs in UPnP are interesting. Both can lead to code execution by causing an error during the handling of specially crafted data, which could lead to a Use After Free (UAF) bug. The bugs in RDP Client all require connecting to a malicious RDP server, but it’s not clear why some are rated Critical and some are rated Important. The NTFS vulnerability requires a user to mount a virtual hard drive on an affected system. The last RCE bug this month is in Azure Stack Edge and requires the attacker to send a specially crafted file upload request that includes a manipulated file name or path, leading to code execution.</p><p class="">There are more than 60 Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs in this month’s release, and as usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. A notable exception is in Exchange Server, where a user on Outlook Web Access (OWA) could gain access to other mailboxes. The bug in Visual Studio Code could allow attackers to gain permissions associated with the MCP Server’s managed identity. The bugs in Windows SDK and Windows UI Automation Manager could let attacker go from low integrity up to medium integrity code execution. The bug in Bluetooth just allows “elevated” privileges without really describing what elevated might be. </p><p class="">Moving on to the more than 20 security feature bypass (SFB) bugs in the June release, there are a total of 10 that impact Secure Boot. All carry scope change (S:C) in the CVSS, meaning successful exploitation affects security boundaries beyond the vulnerable component itself — specifically the ability to load untrusted code at boot, bypass Virtual Secure Mode, and undermine boot integrity guarantees. CVE-2026-45654 explicitly calls out VSM exposure. The bulk of these are credited to Alon Leviev (STORM), which is notable given his prior BootKitty/BlackLotus-adjacent research. The bugs in the Windows Boot Manager have a similar impact as the Secure Boot bugs. The UEFI Secure Boot vulnerabilities go a layer deeper. They require either local admin or physical access but could allow for the running of untrusted code even before the OS loads. Rootkits anyone? The four bugs in BitLocker all require physical access but could yield encrypted data if exploited. The bug in Windows Administration Protection allows attackers to bypass the feature that prevents standard-user apps from performing admin-level actions. The bug in Visual Studio Copilot Chat could be the most interesting non-boot bug here as it allows authentication impersonation. Mark of the Web (MotW) and Excel vulns could bypass user warnings. Lastly, the bug in PC Manager bypasses expected user controls. </p><p class="">Turning our attention to the mass of spoofing bugs in the release, we instantly see 18 impacting SharePoint Server. Fortunately, these are simply cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs. It’s the Exchange bugs we should really watch for. One is an XSS that an attacker can exploit by convincing an Exchange administrator to open a malicious link or message, which then runs code in the admin's web session. That's a meaningful privilege escalation path. Another is listed as an SSRF-based attack, but no other details are available. The last is a lower-impact XSS with limited confidentiality/integrity loss. The bug in Bing Search (remember Bing?) is a classic search result spoofing. The bug in Azure Stack Edge is interesting as it could allow access to resources outside the vulnerable component's security boundary. The bug in Office for Android requires user interaction. The Office Project Server bug is an authenticated XSS with low impact. The final spoofing bug is in Azure Attestation but has already been addressed. You should still verify you are protected by following the instructions in the write-up from Microsoft.</p><p class="">There are 30 different information disclosure bugs in this release, and fortunately, the vast majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. The two bugs in Visual Studio require user interaction and could “disclose information over a network.” How obtuse. The bug in GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code could disclose discloses a sign-in access token for a user's work account. That's a meaningful credential exposure, not just random memory. That leaves the two bugs in Exchange Server. One could allow an authenticated user to gain information about which network services that the Exchange server can reach. The other sounds much like the spoofing bug in OWA as it allows attackers to see information in mailboxes they should not have access to.</p><p class="">I’ve never been a fan of the “tampering” category, as it could mean so many different things. For example, the bug in .NET simply says it could allow an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering locally. Similarly, the bug in Visual Studio says the same, expect here the tampering occurs over a network. Microsoft doesn’t even bother with a CWE for the tampering bug in the DHCP Server, so your guess is as good as mine.</p><p class="">There are seven DoS bugs in the June release, and as usual, Microsoft provides little to no actionable information about the vulnerabilities. The most interesting is the bug in HTTP.sys, which is listed as publicly known. This is an uncontrolled resource consumption, rated "Exploitation More Likely," and publicly disclosed. Since, HTTP.sys sits at the core of IIS and Windows web services, a network-accessible DoS here can take down any Windows server running HTTP-based services. Based on the Acknowledgement, it looks like this bug may have been found using AI. There are no real details for the other bugs, but based simply on the impact, I would focus on the Kerberos and TCP/IP bugs if you had to prioritize.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">The next Patch Tuesday will be on July 14 and will be the last one before Black Hat/DEFCON. It’s usually a big release, so strap in and hang on. I’ll be back then to give you my full thoughts. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p><p class=""> </p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The July 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694560/hacking/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694560/hacking/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly scheduled activities as we let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Adobe has now moved to a bimonthly release schedule, which means they will be releasing patches on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month. I’ll continue to cover the second Tuesday release here and update this blog should the fourth Tuesday release contain anything significant. I think this is a smart way to break up a monster release into something a bit more manageable. Apple has said they are taking a similar approach. We’ll see if other vendors follow their lead.</p><p class="">For the first part of the July release, Adobe released 12 bulletins addressing 88 unique CVEs in Adobe ColdFusion, Commerce, After Effects, Animate, Audition, Bridge, Creative Cloud Desktop Application, Experience Manager, Illustrator, Media Encoder, Premiere Pro, and the Content Credentials SDK.</p><p class="">Here’s this month’s overview table:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-82.html" target="_blank">APSB26-82</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.9</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-73.html" target="_blank">APSB26-73</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Commerce</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/after_effects/apsb26-78.html" target="_blank">APSB26-78</a></td>
    <td>Adobe After Effects</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/animate/apsb26-83.html" target="_blank">APSB26-83</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Animate</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/audition/apsb26-71.html" target="_blank">APSB26-71</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Audition</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb26-81.html" target="_blank">APSB26-81</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Bridge</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/creative-cloud/apsb26-77.html" target="_blank">APSB26-77</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Creative Cloud Desktop Application</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.1</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-74.html" target="_blank">APSB26-74</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-79.html" target="_blank">APSB26-79</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Illustrator</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/media-encoder/apsb26-72.html" target="_blank">APSB26-72</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Media Encoder</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/premiere_pro/apsb26-76.html" target="_blank">APSB26-76</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Premiere Pro</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/content-authenticity-sdk/apsb26-80.html" target="_blank">APSB26-80</a></td>
    <td>Content Credentials SDK</td>
    <td>12</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.2</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
  <tr>
    <td>TOTAL</td>
    <td>12 bulletins</td>
    <td>88</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</tfoot>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">While nothing is under active exploit, I would prioritize the Cold Fusion and Commerce patches first. The patch for Cold Fusion even clocks in with a CVSS 9.9 bug. Beyond that, most of these updates are pretty straightforward. If you’re using these products, patch them. However, you can use you regular patch cadence here. </p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Here it is. The Mother of All Releases. To call this record-breaking is an understatement. How to count this mess is anyone’s guess, but I see new Microsoft 621 CVEs for the month of July. Some of these are in online services where no user action is required. They also list about 480 bugs in Chromium and Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) that I won’t cover here. Here’s how I put this in context. I looked at the last 20 years of Microsoft releases. The CVE count year-to-date exceeds all other years’ totals.</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png" data-image-dimensions="2158x1150" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w" width="2158" height="1150" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  





  <p class="">The products covered this month are also astonishing. There are patches for Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Github Copilot, Defender, Exchange Server, Hyper-V, Ages of Empire II, and Minecraft Server (really!). That phrase “Windows components” does some pretty heavy lifting here, too, as just about everything you’ve ever heard of is getting patched. All told, there are 63 rated Critical, six rated Moderate, one rated Low, with the rest rated Important in severity. Eight of these bugs were submitted through the ZDI program (more on that later). Two CVEs are listed as under active exploit while one other is listed as publicly known.</p><p class="">So how do we eat this elephant? One byte at a time (pun intended). Let’s start by looking a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bugs being exploited in the wild.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><strong>CVE-2026-56155</strong></a><strong> - Active Directory Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This is one of several AD FS being patched this month, but it’s the only one being actively exploited. It stems from insufficient access-control granularity and does require local access and low privileges to start, but AD FS is exactly the kind of identity infrastructure attackers love to pivot through once they're in. It can also be paired with an RCE as we often see in ransomware. Test and deploy this patch quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56154"><strong>CVE-2026-56164</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>The other bug being exploited in the wild this month is a modest CVSS 5.3 – but it shows why Moderate severity bugs still matter. It's a missing-authentication flaw, meaning an unauthenticated attacker can hit it over the network with no user interaction required. When something this reachable is being actively abused, patch it now and worry about the score later.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><strong>CVE-2026-57092</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Windows VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This patch rates the highest CVSS score for the month: a solid 9.9. It’s a use-after-free that lets a low-privileged attacker escalate to full host compromise across a VM boundary. We saw something like this demonstrated at Pwn2Own Berlin on ESXi, but it clearly isn’t alone. If you’re using VMSwitch in your Hyper-V deployments (and you likely are), test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><strong>CVE-2026-50522</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><strong>58644</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This matching pair of CVSS 9.8 bugs results from the deserialization-of-untrusted-data and are reachable without authentication or user interaction. CVE-2026-50522 was demonstrated during <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog/2026/5/16/pwn2own-berlin-2026-day-three-results-and-master-of-pwn">Pwn2Own Berlin</a>, so it’s odd to see Microsoft list it as “Exploit Maturity Unknown” since we literally handed them a working exploit. Just another reason to do your own risk assessment and not rely 100% on the vendor. If you have any Internet accessible SharePoint servers, test and deploy this patch quickly. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><strong>CVE-2026-56190</strong></a><strong> - Remote Desktop Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</strong><br> This patch covers an unauthenticated, network-reachable, no user interaction required bug. The root cause is a classic one: use of uninitialized resource (CWE-908), meaning specially crafted RDP traffic can interact with memory that was never properly initialized, letting an attacker corrupt memory and potentially steer code execution. RDP Servers are a common target, so audit your systems to see which are internet accessible and start from there. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><strong>CVE-2026-55008</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Exchange Server Spoofing Vulnerability<br></strong>Ignore the title here and treat this like the XSS bug it is. The vulnerability is listed as a CVSS 9.6 since it’s a stored cross-site scripting flaw in Outlook Web Access, with a scope-changed impact that lets it break out of the web app context entirely. An attacker sends a specially crafted email, and if the victim simply opens it in OWA, arbitrary JavaScript executes in their browser session — no attachment needed, no macro warning, just viewing the message does it. If you’re using OWA, test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><strong>CVE-2026-50518</strong></a><strong> - Windows DHCP Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>There are a couple of these DHCP RCE patches in this release, but the other has caveats while this one does not. Both are heap-based buffer overflows scoring CVSS 9.8, both unauthenticated and network-reachable. If you're running DHCP Server role on anything Internet-adjacent (you're not, right?), these move to the top of the list.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><strong>CVE-2026-56188</strong></a><strong> - Windows Server Network driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Another Critical-rated bug, this one is caused by a race condition. It’s always fun to see a TOCTOU bug rated this high, since race conditions are notoriously finicky to exploit reliably. While it may prove tricky to exploit, this bug could allow an attacker to execute privileged code over the network without user interaction. Don’t let the race condition lull you to sleep on a wormable bug.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><strong>CVE-2026-55010</strong></a><strong> - Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>File this in the “why not” category. This bug is a heap-based buffer overflow in Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server, also CVSS 9.8 and also unauthenticated RCE. Yes, your kid’s Minecraft server (it is your kid’s server, right?) is exposed to the same class of bug as your DHCP infrastructure. Patch it anyway.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for July 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026-Jul-cvrf.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="920">
 <col width="144">
 <col width="256">
 <col width="104" span="5">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="144" class="xl65" height="47">CVE</td>
  <td width="256" class="xl65">Title</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Severity</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">CVSS</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Public</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Exploited</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Type</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><span>CVE-2026-56155</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56164"><span>CVE-2026-56164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50661"><span>CVE-2026-50661</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54121"><span>CVE-2026-54121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Certificate Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45499"><span>CVE-2026-45499 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure OpenAI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48564"><span>CVE-2026-48564</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50370"><span>CVE-2026-50370</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56159"><span>CVE-2026-56159</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50382"><span>CVE-2026-50382</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41106"><span>CVE-2026-41106 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft 365 Copilot
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26145"><span>CVE-2026-26145 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Azure
  Synapse Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48561"><span>CVE-2026-48561</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Copilot
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55011"><span>CVE-2026-55011</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55012"><span>CVE-2026-55012</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="96">
  <td class="xl67" height="96"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55944"><span>CVE-2026-55944</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Dynamics NAV
  and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (On Premises) Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57100"><span>CVE-2026-57100 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Entra
  Provisioning Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55041"><span>CVE-2026-55041</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54998"><span>CVE-2026-54998 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Online Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><span>CVE-2026-55008</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54992"><span>CVE-2026-54992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50314"><span>CVE-2026-50314</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50467"><span>CVE-2026-50467</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55018"><span>CVE-2026-55018</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55022"><span>CVE-2026-55022</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55045"><span>CVE-2026-55045</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55049"><span>CVE-2026-55049</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55129"><span>CVE-2026-55129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55056"><span>CVE-2026-55056</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55140"><span>CVE-2026-55140</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55043"><span>CVE-2026-55043</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55123"><span>CVE-2026-55123</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55120"><span>CVE-2026-55120</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><span>CVE-2026-50522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><span>CVE-2026-58644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55040"><span>CVE-2026-55040</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54117"><span>CVE-2026-54117</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54118"><span>CVE-2026-54118</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50655"><span>CVE-2026-50655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56189"><span>CVE-2026-56189</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57090"><span>CVE-2026-57090</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57094"><span>CVE-2026-57094</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57087"><span>CVE-2026-57087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><span>CVE-2026-57092</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55033"><span>CVE-2026-55033</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55127"><span>CVE-2026-55127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55132"><span>CVE-2026-55132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><span>CVE-2026-55010</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Minecraft Bedrock
  Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50474"><span>CVE-2026-50474</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49164"><span>CVE-2026-49164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54128"><span>CVE-2026-54128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><span>CVE-2026-50518</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49796"><span>CVE-2026-49796</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50380"><span>CVE-2026-50380</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54127"><span>CVE-2026-54127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50680"><span>CVE-2026-50680</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50327"><span>CVE-2026-50327</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58542"><span>CVE-2026-58542</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58608"><span>CVE-2026-58608</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54982"><span>CVE-2026-54982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54995"><span>CVE-2026-54995</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42982"><span>CVE-2026-42982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50392"><span>CVE-2026-50392</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50694"><span>CVE-2026-50694</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Socket
  Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><span>CVE-2026-56188</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Network
  driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50444"><span>CVE-2026-50444</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54999"><span>CVE-2026-54999</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47302"><span>CVE-2026-47302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50525"><span>CVE-2026-50525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50651"><span>CVE-2026-50651</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57108"><span>CVE-2026-57108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50524"><span>CVE-2026-50524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50527"><span>CVE-2026-50527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50648"><span>CVE-2026-50648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50650"><span>CVE-2026-50650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50646"><span>CVE-2026-50646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50649"><span>CVE-2026-50649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47304"><span>CVE-2026-47304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50528"><span>CVE-2026-50528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50659"><span>CVE-2026-50659</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50526"><span>CVE-2026-50526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50682"><span>CVE-2026-50682</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55001"><span>CVE-2026-55001</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50647"><span>CVE-2026-50647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50684"><span>CVE-2026-50684</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56170"><span>CVE-2026-56170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47300"><span>CVE-2026-47300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47303"><span>CVE-2026-47303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50652"><span>CVE-2026-50652</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50653"><span>CVE-2026-50653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57969"><span>CVE-2026-57969</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58279"><span>CVE-2026-58279</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47632"><span>CVE-2026-47632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Monitor Agent
  Metrics Extension Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50338"><span>CVE-2026-50338</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Spring Apps
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50488"><span>CVE-2026-50488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Clipboard User Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50491"><span>CVE-2026-50491</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Code Integrity DLL
  (ci.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50381"><span>CVE-2026-50381</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Composite Image File
  System driver (cimfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50427"><span>CVE-2026-50427</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Content Delivery
  Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50692"><span>CVE-2026-50692</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58633"><span>CVE-2026-58633</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58634"><span>CVE-2026-58634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50296"><span>CVE-2026-50296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50375"><span>CVE-2026-50375</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50353"><span>CVE-2026-50353</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50493"><span>CVE-2026-50493</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56643"><span>CVE-2026-56643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56644"><span>CVE-2026-56644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58629"><span>CVE-2026-58629</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49174"><span>CVE-2026-49174</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50495"><span>CVE-2026-50495</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57088"><span>CVE-2026-57088</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Extensible Storage
  Engine (ESENT) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50663"><span>CVE-2026-50663</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Game: Age of Empires
  II: Definitive Edition Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47282"><span>CVE-2026-47282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41109"><span>CVE-2026-41109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50510"><span>CVE-2026-50510</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49787"><span>CVE-2026-49787</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50420"><span>CVE-2026-50420</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49788"><span>CVE-2026-49788</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP/2 Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50696"><span>CVE-2026-50696</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Internet Key Exchange
  (IKE) Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58617"><span>CVE-2026-58617</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">M365 Copilot for iOS
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58595"><span>CVE-2026-58595</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Bing App for
  IOS Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49162"><span>CVE-2026-49162</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50305"><span>CVE-2026-50305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50361"><span>CVE-2026-50361</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50466"><span>CVE-2026-50466</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50458"><span>CVE-2026-50458</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50658"><span>CVE-2026-50658</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56178"><span>CVE-2026-56178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50657"><span>CVE-2026-50657</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50329"><span>CVE-2026-50329</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58541"><span>CVE-2026-58541</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58596"><span>CVE-2026-58596</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57991"><span>CVE-2026-57991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58291"><span>CVE-2026-58291</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57981"><span>CVE-2026-57981</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57984"><span>CVE-2026-57984</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57985"><span>CVE-2026-57985</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57986"><span>CVE-2026-57986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57988"><span>CVE-2026-57988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57992"><span>CVE-2026-57992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58276"><span>CVE-2026-58276</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56645"><span>CVE-2026-56645</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57974"><span>CVE-2026-57974</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57975"><span>CVE-2026-57975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58281"><span>CVE-2026-58281</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58284"><span>CVE-2026-58284</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58285"><span>CVE-2026-58285</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58287"><span>CVE-2026-58287</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58288"><span>CVE-2026-58288</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58289"><span>CVE-2026-58289</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58290"><span>CVE-2026-58290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58292"><span>CVE-2026-58292</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58293"><span>CVE-2026-58293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58294"><span>CVE-2026-58294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57983"><span>CVE-2026-57983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58295"><span>CVE-2026-58295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58525"><span>CVE-2026-58525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57987"><span>CVE-2026-57987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58278"><span>CVE-2026-58278</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56646"><span>CVE-2026-56646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57977"><span>CVE-2026-57977</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57993"><span>CVE-2026-57993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58282"><span>CVE-2026-58282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58283"><span>CVE-2026-58283</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58286"><span>CVE-2026-58286</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58298"><span>CVE-2026-58298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58524"><span>CVE-2026-58524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58296"><span>CVE-2026-58296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58297"><span>CVE-2026-58297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58300"><span>CVE-2026-58300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58522"><span>CVE-2026-58522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58299"><span>CVE-2026-58299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58523"><span>CVE-2026-58523</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50678"><span>CVE-2026-50678</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54988"><span>CVE-2026-54988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48580"><span>CVE-2026-48580</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50408"><span>CVE-2026-50408</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55046"><span>CVE-2026-55046</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55138"><span>CVE-2026-55138</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55054"><span>CVE-2026-55054</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55122"><span>CVE-2026-55122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55898"><span>CVE-2026-55898</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50675"><span>CVE-2026-50675</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55899"><span>CVE-2026-55899</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55948"><span>CVE-2026-55948</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58618"><span>CVE-2026-58618</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47642"><span>CVE-2026-47642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55024"><span>CVE-2026-55024</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55025"><span>CVE-2026-55025</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55031"><span>CVE-2026-55031</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55048"><span>CVE-2026-55048</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55029"><span>CVE-2026-55029</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55039"><span>CVE-2026-55039</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55136"><span>CVE-2026-55136</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55141"><span>CVE-2026-55141</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55036"><span>CVE-2026-55036</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55044"><span>CVE-2026-55044</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55037"><span>CVE-2026-55037</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55058"><span>CVE-2026-55058</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55137"><span>CVE-2026-55137</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55053"><span>CVE-2026-55053</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55131"><span>CVE-2026-55131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54131"><span>CVE-2026-54131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55947"><span>CVE-2026-55947</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55949"><span>CVE-2026-55949</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56156"><span>CVE-2026-56156</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55006"><span>CVE-2026-55006</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55009"><span>CVE-2026-55009</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55005"><span>CVE-2026-55005</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56642"><span>CVE-2026-56642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Fabric Data
  Warehouse Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50343"><span>CVE-2026-50343</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Install
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50439"><span>CVE-2026-50439</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58537"><span>CVE-2026-58537</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft NAT Helper
  Components (ipnathlp.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56193"><span>CVE-2026-56193</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55023"><span>CVE-2026-55023</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55026"><span>CVE-2026-55026</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55027"><span>CVE-2026-55027</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55028"><span>CVE-2026-55028</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55047"><span>CVE-2026-55047</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55035"><span>CVE-2026-55035</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55057"><span>CVE-2026-55057</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl75" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55121"><span>CVE-2026-55121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55042"><span>CVE-2026-55042</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55139"><span>CVE-2026-55139</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50665"><span>CVE-2026-50665</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56192"><span>CVE-2026-56192</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56195"><span>CVE-2026-56195</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47290"><span>CVE-2026-47290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50301"><span>CVE-2026-50301</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55017"><span>CVE-2026-55017</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55125"><span>CVE-2026-55125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55133"><span>CVE-2026-55133</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft OneNote
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58636"><span>CVE-2026-58636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50438"><span>CVE-2026-50438</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58647"><span>CVE-2026-58647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerBI
  Report Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55052"><span>CVE-2026-55052</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58277"><span>CVE-2026-58277</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55051"><span>CVE-2026-55051</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54108"><span>CVE-2026-54108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55016"><span>CVE-2026-55016</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55019"><span>CVE-2026-55019</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55020"><span>CVE-2026-55020</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55021"><span>CVE-2026-55021</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55030"><span>CVE-2026-55030</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55034"><span>CVE-2026-55034</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55126"><span>CVE-2026-55126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55135"><span>CVE-2026-55135</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56157"><span>CVE-2026-56157</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47296"><span>CVE-2026-47296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55002"><span>CVE-2026-55002</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47295"><span>CVE-2026-47295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50468"><span>CVE-2026-50468</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54116"><span>CVE-2026-54116</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42900"><span>CVE-2026-42900</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49784"><span>CVE-2026-49784</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50356"><span>CVE-2026-50356</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49165"><span>CVE-2026-49165</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54993"><span>CVE-2026-54993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58610"><span>CVE-2026-58610</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55050"><span>CVE-2026-55050</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55124"><span>CVE-2026-55124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55142"><span>CVE-2026-55142</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55032"><span>CVE-2026-55032</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55055"><span>CVE-2026-55055</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55038"><span>CVE-2026-55038</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55134"><span>CVE-2026-55134</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55128"><span>CVE-2026-55128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55130"><span>CVE-2026-55130</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50359"><span>CVE-2026-50359</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Core
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57097"><span>CVE-2026-57097</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50346"><span>CVE-2026-50346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Netlogon RPC Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50402"><span>CVE-2026-50402</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">NTFS Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50506"><span>CVE-2026-50506</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45646"><span>CVE-2026-45646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54989"><span>CVE-2026-54989</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Quality Windows
  Audio/Video Experience (QWAVE) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50365"><span>CVE-2026-50365</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Access
  Management service/API (RPC server) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54990"><span>CVE-2026-54990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58594"><span>CVE-2026-58594</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><span>CVE-2026-56190</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop
  Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49783"><span>CVE-2026-49783</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42990"><span>CVE-2026-42990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">SQL Server ODBC driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49168"><span>CVE-2026-49168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Storage Spaces Direct
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48581"><span>CVE-2026-48581</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Surface Broker SDMA
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49180"><span>CVE-2026-49180</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50455"><span>CVE-2026-50455</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54111"><span>CVE-2026-54111</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58543"><span>CVE-2026-58543</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58601"><span>CVE-2026-58601</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Virtual Hard Disk
  (VHD) Miniport Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulernability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50520"><span>CVE-2026-50520</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45496"><span>CVE-2026-45496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57101"><span>CVE-2026-57101</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57102"><span>CVE-2026-57102</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47305"><span>CVE-2026-47305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49805"><span>CVE-2026-49805</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50297"><span>CVE-2026-50297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50325"><span>CVE-2026-50325</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50489"><span>CVE-2026-50489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57095"><span>CVE-2026-57095</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50416"><span>CVE-2026-50416</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56184"><span>CVE-2026-56184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50432"><span>CVE-2026-50432</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Window Virtual
  Filtering Platform (VFP) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54119"><span>CVE-2026-54119</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57976"><span>CVE-2026-57976</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50366"><span>CVE-2026-50366</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49178"><span>CVE-2026-49178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58529"><span>CVE-2026-58529</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services (ADFS) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54983"><span>CVE-2026-54983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50695"><span>CVE-2026-50695</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50304"><span>CVE-2026-50304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50368"><span>CVE-2026-50368</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50324"><span>CVE-2026-50324</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50355"><span>CVE-2026-50355</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50411"><span>CVE-2026-50411</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58631"><span>CVE-2026-58631</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56196"><span>CVE-2026-56196</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56197"><span>CVE-2026-56197</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56169"><span>CVE-2026-56169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57107"><span>CVE-2026-57107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56185"><span>CVE-2026-56185</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50312"><span>CVE-2026-50312</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50462"><span>CVE-2026-50462</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57093"><span>CVE-2026-57093</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34346"><span>CVE-2026-34346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48572"><span>CVE-2026-48572</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48571"><span>CVE-2026-48571</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50400"><span>CVE-2026-50400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50331"><span>CVE-2026-50331</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Application
  Model Core API Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49803"><span>CVE-2026-49803</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows AppX
  Deployment Extensions Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50351"><span>CVE-2026-50351</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio
  Compression Manager (ACM) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50440"><span>CVE-2026-50440</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34328"><span>CVE-2026-34328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50406"><span>CVE-2026-50406</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Engine
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50364"><span>CVE-2026-50364</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42975"><span>CVE-2026-42975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth Port
  Driver Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58538"><span>CVE-2026-58538</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58638"><span>CVE-2026-58638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Boot Loader
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58637"><span>CVE-2026-58637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Client-Side
  Caching Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50384"><span>CVE-2026-50384</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clip Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49183"><span>CVE-2026-49183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50689"><span>CVE-2026-50689</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50374"><span>CVE-2026-50374</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58536"><span>CVE-2026-58536</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58613"><span>CVE-2026-58613</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50401"><span>CVE-2026-50401</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50697"><span>CVE-2026-50697</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50667"><span>CVE-2026-50667</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50421"><span>CVE-2026-50421</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Connected User
  Experiences and Telemetry Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50428"><span>CVE-2026-50428</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Container
  Isolation FS Filter Driver (unionfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50352"><span>CVE-2026-50352</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50302"><span>CVE-2026-50302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55144"><span>CVE-2026-55144</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptography
  API: Next Generation (CNG) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50347"><span>CVE-2026-50347</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Data.dll
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49181"><span>CVE-2026-49181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50683"><span>CVE-2026-50683</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58627"><span>CVE-2026-58627</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50685"><span>CVE-2026-50685</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49807"><span>CVE-2026-49807</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DirectX
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49175"><span>CVE-2026-49175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50487"><span>CVE-2026-50487</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50465"><span>CVE-2026-50465</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49169"><span>CVE-2026-49169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50426"><span>CVE-2026-50426</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50424"><span>CVE-2026-50424</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Domain
  Controller Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50300"><span>CVE-2026-50300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50437"><span>CVE-2026-50437</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34348"><span>CVE-2026-34348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50502"><span>CVE-2026-50502</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33842"><span>CVE-2026-33842</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40422"><span>CVE-2026-40422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41087"><span>CVE-2026-41087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50473"><span>CVE-2026-50473</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50442"><span>CVE-2026-50442</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50389"><span>CVE-2026-50389</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50456"><span>CVE-2026-50456</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57084"><span>CVE-2026-57084</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57091"><span>CVE-2026-57091</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File History
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50405"><span>CVE-2026-50405</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Filtering
  Platform Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49172"><span>CVE-2026-49172</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows FTP Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50387"><span>CVE-2026-50387</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54122"><span>CVE-2026-54122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50483"><span>CVE-2026-50483</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58609"><span>CVE-2026-58609</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50391"><span>CVE-2026-50391</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Group Policy
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50310"><span>CVE-2026-50310</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Human
  Interface Device Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50485"><span>CVE-2026-50485</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54129"><span>CVE-2026-54129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50315"><span>CVE-2026-50315</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Image
  Acquisition Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58534"><span>CVE-2026-58534</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Input Method
  Editor (IME) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50490"><span>CVE-2026-50490</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58540"><span>CVE-2026-58540</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50425"><span>CVE-2026-50425</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal
  System User Profile Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50293"><span>CVE-2026-50293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal Task
  Bar Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49167"><span>CVE-2026-49167</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49173"><span>CVE-2026-49173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54132"><span>CVE-2026-54132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49795"><span>CVE-2026-49795</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49798"><span>CVE-2026-49798</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49808"><span>CVE-2026-49808</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50354"><span>CVE-2026-50354</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50332"><span>CVE-2026-50332</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50377"><span>CVE-2026-50377</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50390"><span>CVE-2026-50390</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50423"><span>CVE-2026-50423</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50397"><span>CVE-2026-50397</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50436"><span>CVE-2026-50436</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50399"><span>CVE-2026-50399</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50459"><span>CVE-2026-50459</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50477"><span>CVE-2026-50477</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50478"><span>CVE-2026-50478</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50484"><span>CVE-2026-50484</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50673"><span>CVE-2026-50673</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58532"><span>CVE-2026-58532</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50294"><span>CVE-2026-50294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50316"><span>CVE-2026-50316</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50419"><span>CVE-2026-50419</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50463"><span>CVE-2026-50463</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50475"><span>CVE-2026-50475</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50429"><span>CVE-2026-50429</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58614"><span>CVE-2026-58614</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58545"><span>CVE-2026-58545</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58602"><span>CVE-2026-58602</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50393"><span>CVE-2026-50393</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50396"><span>CVE-2026-50396</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50378"><span>CVE-2026-50378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50303"><span>CVE-2026-50303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40378"><span>CVE-2026-40378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49799"><span>CVE-2026-49799</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50371"><span>CVE-2026-50371</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows LUA File
  Virtualization Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58544"><span>CVE-2026-58544</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Management
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50404"><span>CVE-2026-50404</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50358"><span>CVE-2026-50358</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50336"><span>CVE-2026-50336</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50398"><span>CVE-2026-50398</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50414"><span>CVE-2026-50414</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50379"><span>CVE-2026-50379</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50433"><span>CVE-2026-50433</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50676"><span>CVE-2026-50676</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50677"><span>CVE-2026-50677</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34349"><span>CVE-2026-34349</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50394"><span>CVE-2026-50394</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50415"><span>CVE-2026-50415</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57083"><span>CVE-2026-57083</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Photo
  Codec Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54115"><span>CVE-2026-54115</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing (MSMQ) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50447"><span>CVE-2026-50447</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50505"><span>CVE-2026-50505</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50342"><span>CVE-2026-50342</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56183"><span>CVE-2026-56183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56187"><span>CVE-2026-56187</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58635"><span>CVE-2026-58635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Narrator
  Braille Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50500"><span>CVE-2026-50500</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Netlogon
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50476"><span>CVE-2026-50476</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50450"><span>CVE-2026-50450</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56650"><span>CVE-2026-56650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56649"><span>CVE-2026-56649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50470"><span>CVE-2026-50470</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50496"><span>CVE-2026-50496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56194"><span>CVE-2026-56194</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56648"><span>CVE-2026-56648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50337"><span>CVE-2026-50337</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Notification
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49789"><span>CVE-2026-49789</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50412"><span>CVE-2026-50412</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50422"><span>CVE-2026-50422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50672"><span>CVE-2026-50672</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56175"><span>CVE-2026-56175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56182"><span>CVE-2026-56182</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50341"><span>CVE-2026-50341</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58640"><span>CVE-2026-58640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49184"><span>CVE-2026-49184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49797"><span>CVE-2026-49797</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50308"><span>CVE-2026-50308</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50386"><span>CVE-2026-50386</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50309"><span>CVE-2026-50309</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50313"><span>CVE-2026-50313</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50388"><span>CVE-2026-50388</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50448"><span>CVE-2026-50448</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50471"><span>CVE-2026-50471</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50461"><span>CVE-2026-50461</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50417"><span>CVE-2026-50417</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50482"><span>CVE-2026-50482</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50494"><span>CVE-2026-50494</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50344"><span>CVE-2026-50344</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50686"><span>CVE-2026-50686</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50335"><span>CVE-2026-50335</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50317"><span>CVE-2026-50317</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54987"><span>CVE-2026-54987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50435"><span>CVE-2026-50435</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50409"><span>CVE-2026-50409</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40400"><span>CVE-2026-40400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows PowerShell
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49166"><span>CVE-2026-49166</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55004"><span>CVE-2026-55004</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50499"><span>CVE-2026-50499</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50383"><span>CVE-2026-50383</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57085"><span>CVE-2026-57085</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50469"><span>CVE-2026-50469</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50434"><span>CVE-2026-50434</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50339"><span>CVE-2026-50339</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50430"><span>CVE-2026-50430</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50334"><span>CVE-2026-50334</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44800"><span>CVE-2026-44800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50363"><span>CVE-2026-50363</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50431"><span>CVE-2026-50431</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Quality of
  Service (QoS) Packet Scheduler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50372"><span>CVE-2026-50372</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Redirected
  Drive Buffering System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50666"><span>CVE-2026-50666</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56647"><span>CVE-2026-56647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Service Infrastructure Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50330"><span>CVE-2026-50330</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50376"><span>CVE-2026-50376</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50504"><span>CVE-2026-50504</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58533"><span>CVE-2026-58533</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58535"><span>CVE-2026-58535</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58546"><span>CVE-2026-58546</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58539"><span>CVE-2026-58539</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55003"><span>CVE-2026-55003</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57979"><span>CVE-2026-57979</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50445"><span>CVE-2026-50445</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50497"><span>CVE-2026-50497</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54126"><span>CVE-2026-54126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57982"><span>CVE-2026-57982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50369"><span>CVE-2026-50369</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58626"><span>CVE-2026-58626</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55014"><span>CVE-2026-55014</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Help
  Defense Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50318"><span>CVE-2026-50318</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50407"><span>CVE-2026-50407</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50357"><span>CVE-2026-50357</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50441"><span>CVE-2026-50441</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50668"><span>CVE-2026-50668</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54109"><span>CVE-2026-54109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49792"><span>CVE-2026-49792</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49793"><span>CVE-2026-49793</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50362"><span>CVE-2026-50362</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50492"><span>CVE-2026-50492</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50501"><span>CVE-2026-50501</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58530"><span>CVE-2026-58530</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49791"><span>CVE-2026-49791</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50451"><span>CVE-2026-50451</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57096"><span>CVE-2026-57096</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50323"><span>CVE-2026-50323</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50452"><span>CVE-2026-50452</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50348"><span>CVE-2026-50348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50345"><span>CVE-2026-50345</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50322"><span>CVE-2026-50322</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50340"><span>CVE-2026-50340</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50410"><span>CVE-2026-50410</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50449"><span>CVE-2026-50449</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50460"><span>CVE-2026-50460</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50403"><span>CVE-2026-50403</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50385"><span>CVE-2026-50385</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50413"><span>CVE-2026-50413</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50457"><span>CVE-2026-50457</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50486"><span>CVE-2026-50486</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50503"><span>CVE-2026-50503</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54125"><span>CVE-2026-54125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58527"><span>CVE-2026-58527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50373"><span>CVE-2026-50373</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50679"><span>CVE-2026-50679</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44806"><span>CVE-2026-44806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50681"><span>CVE-2026-50681</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56186"><span>CVE-2026-56186</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50367"><span>CVE-2026-50367</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58619"><span>CVE-2026-58619</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50311"><span>CVE-2026-50311</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50328"><span>CVE-2026-50328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58531"><span>CVE-2026-58531</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54997"><span>CVE-2026-54997</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49801"><span>CVE-2026-49801</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50690"><span>CVE-2026-50690</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56168"><span>CVE-2026-56168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50360"><span>CVE-2026-50360</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57089"><span>CVE-2026-57089</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Network Transport Driver (srvnet.sys) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50333"><span>CVE-2026-50333</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50298"><span>CVE-2026-50298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49171"><span>CVE-2026-49171</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Speech Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49170"><span>CVE-2026-49170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows
  StateRepository API Server file Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58526"><span>CVE-2026-58526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50299"><span>CVE-2026-50299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage Spaces
  Direct Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57968"><span>CVE-2026-57968</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57973"><span>CVE-2026-57973</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50418"><span>CVE-2026-50418</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows System Secure
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50306"><span>CVE-2026-50306</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50307"><span>CVE-2026-50307</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49177"><span>CVE-2026-49177</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50669"><span>CVE-2026-50669</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Telephony
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54124"><span>CVE-2026-54124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Terminal
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50350"><span>CVE-2026-50350</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Trusted
  Runtime Interface Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50326"><span>CVE-2026-50326</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Unified
  Consent System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49790"><span>CVE-2026-49790</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50498"><span>CVE-2026-50498</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58547"><span>CVE-2026-58547</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Plug
  and Play (UPnP) Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49794"><span>CVE-2026-49794</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50453"><span>CVE-2026-50453</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58528"><span>CVE-2026-58528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50321"><span>CVE-2026-50321</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50479"><span>CVE-2026-50479</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Hub Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55000"><span>CVE-2026-55000</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54991"><span>CVE-2026-54991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54996"><span>CVE-2026-54996</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49802"><span>CVE-2026-49802</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49806"><span>CVE-2026-49806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50674"><span>CVE-2026-50674</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49804"><span>CVE-2026-49804</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Video
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50454"><span>CVE-2026-50454</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows User Interface
  Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49176"><span>CVE-2026-49176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WalletService
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49800"><span>CVE-2026-49800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50480"><span>CVE-2026-50480</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56173"><span>CVE-2026-56173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WebView
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58632"><span>CVE-2026-58632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32 Kernel
  Subsystem Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54107"><span>CVE-2026-54107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54986"><span>CVE-2026-54986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54112"><span>CVE-2026-54112</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54114"><span>CVE-2026-54114</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50670"><span>CVE-2026-50670</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50688"><span>CVE-2026-50688</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50687"><span>CVE-2026-50687</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56176"><span>CVE-2026-56176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58628"><span>CVE-2026-58628</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Wireless
  Network Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50295"><span>CVE-2026-50295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Zero Trust DNS
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50509"><span>CVE-2026-50509</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Wireless Wide Area
  Network Service (WwanSvc) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55945"><span>CVE-2026-55945</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45488"><span>CVE-2026-45488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45489"><span>CVE-2026-45489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55145"><span>CVE-2026-55145</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Outlook Copilot
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56181"><span>CVE-2026-56181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Address Translation (NAT) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58597"><span>CVE-2026-58597</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft
  Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl73">Low</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="144"></td>
  <td width="256"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>** Indicates this CVEs has already been resolved by Microsoft, and no further action is needed by the end user.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">I’ll do my best to summarize everything else in this release, but no promises. I’m only human after all.</p><p class=""> </p><p class="">Looking at the remaining Critical-rated patches, Office is its own weather system: fourteen Word/Excel/PowerPoint/Office RCEs clustered at CVSS 7.8, plus five Windows Media Foundation RCEs. Outside of the Preview Pane attack vector, they are individually unremarkable; collectively, patch Office and reboot. Always reboot. We’ve already mentioned DHCP some, but DHCP Server can't catch a break. Beyond the one already covered, add CVE-2026-56159, CVE-2026-48564, CVE-2026-50370, and DHCP Client cousin CVE-2026-54128. Five DHCP RCEs in one release. Rounding things out, Print Spooler (CVE-2026-58608), Windows TCP/IP (CVE-2026-54999), and a SQL Server RCE pair (CVE-2026-54117/54118) all receive patches, and all are rated a CVSS 8.8. VE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem RCE, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair; it’s unauthenticated, network-reachable, and easy to overlook since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-48561 (Microsoft Copilot RCE, 9.6) and CVE-2026-50380 (Windows GDI+ RCE, 9.6) round out the near-top tier. Don't forget CVE-2026-55040, a SharePoint Security Feature Bypass (9.1) — patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product family. Identity and infrastructure get hit too: CVE-2026-54121 (AD Certificate Services EoP, 8.8) and CVE-2026-50444 (WSUS EoP, 8.8). The obscure Reliable Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) takes two RCEs (CVE-2026-54982, CVE-2026-54995), and CVE-2026-50474 gives Remote Desktop Client its own RCE, separate from the RDP one already covered. The rest is a long tail: Defender RCE x2, GDI+ again, Windows Media x2, Secure Kernel Mode EoP x2, and a second Hyper-V EoP. You can consider these “normal” as far as patch cadence goes.</p><p class="">That leaves us with 95 RCE to discuss. I would explain, but there is too much, so let me sum up. CVE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair: unauthenticated, easy to miss since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-54990 (Remote Desktop Client), CVE-2026-49172 (Windows FTP Service), and CVE-2026-50447 (MSMQ) all hit 9.8 too, proof severity labels lag CVSS sometimes. CVE-2026-48561 (Copilot) and CVE-2026-50380 (GDI+) sit at 9.6.</p><p class="">The pattern worth watching: 14 Windows NTFS and 7 ReFS RCEs/ That makes 21 filesystem-driver bugs, an unusually large cluster suggesting a shared root cause. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes 21 more that are genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not Chromium re-listing noise. Remote Desktop Client racks up a second and third RCE (CVE-2026-50474, CVE-2026-58594), and Windows Admin Center picks up two (CVE-2026-56196/56197) — WAC exposure keeps creeping into these releases. Exchange Server (CVE-2026-55005) and AD Domain Services (CVE-2026-49178) both land at 8.8.</p><p class="">And because this release wouldn't be complete without it: CVE-2026-50663, an RCE in Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition. Yes, really. Patch your civilization anyway.</p><p class="">There are close to 260 EoP bugs in this month’s release. Microsoft could have just published the EoPs and still had a record-setting month. As usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. What’s really frustrating is that 94 have no explicit privilege statement at all. Microsoft just says “elevate privileges” with no detail. By my count, that leaves around 25 bugs to consider. Some don’t elevate at all. The FAQ literally says the attacker just gets “the rights of the user running the affected application.” That covers Win32k, Clip Service, Search Service, MSMQ, and SharePoint. A few get a Low-to-Medium integrity bump. There are also a couple that lead to downgraded service accounts or arbitrary file deletion, but nothing else I’ve seen really stands out too much.</p><p class="">There are 20 Security Feature Bypass (SFB) bugs this month, and it's a genuinely mixed bag. CVE-2026-55040 leads at Critical, CVSS 9.1 as it’s weak authentication in SharePoint Server. Patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product. The AI-coding-tool trend continues: GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code and Visual Studio all land SFB bugs, mostly injection or path-traversal flavored. BitLocker is this month's lone publicly disclosed bug. It’s not exploited yet, but public disclosure is a countdown clock, not a free pass. It requires physical access, as does the bug in Microsoft XML. The firmware/boot cluster is worth a second look: Secure Boot, Boot Loader, and Key Guard all touch the trust chain below the OS. Meaning, despite a low CVSS score, “if this fails, nothing above it can be trusted” stakes. Rounding out the SFB patches, there are two .NET SFBs, two Windows Kernel SFBs, and a DNS/Cryptographic Services bringing up the rear.</p><p class="">The July release includes 31Spoofing bugs this month, and we’ve already covered the most important (Exchange). SharePoint Server accounts for another ten with almost all the same root cause: stored XSS letting an authenticated attacker spoof content in the browser. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes fifteen more spanning access-control failures, SSRF, type confusion, and UI misrepresentation. All genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not re-listed Chromium noise. The remaining six round out the usual suspects: a Windows NAT spoofing bug reachable from an adjacent network, a Bing app flaw on iOS, a PowerBI Report Server XSS issue, a .NET output-encoding bug, and an AD FS spoofing flaw. None publicly disclosed, none exploited, but with SharePoint's history this year, don't let "just Spoofing" lull you into deprioritizing the patch cycle.</p><p class="">Of 111 Information Disclosure bugs, the overwhelming majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. GitHub Copilot is the standout. Here, the bug insufficiently protected credentials, meaning actual secrets leak, not memory scraps. The Windows Admin Center flaw discloses data via improper authentication. A management console leaking to an unauthorized party is a bigger deal than it sounds. SharePoint uses SSRF to pull data server-side, and the Event Logging Service is a protection-mechanism failure, not a memory bug at all. Edge picks up three genuinely file-system-flavored disclosures — improper authorization, files/directories accessible to external parties, and link-following — plus Edge for Android exposing “private personal information” twice and two path-traversal bugs. The remaining 40+ are mostly one-line “exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor” entries scattered across File Explorer, Push Notifications, Cryptographic Services, and Win32k.</p><p class="">Only 8 Tampering bugs this month, the smallest bucket, but a couple stand out. The top of the list is a WSUS bug, caused by an uncaught exception that lets an unauthenticated attacker tamper with the update service over the network. That’s your patch-management infrastructure itself being the target, which always deserves extra attention. Windows CNG (the crypto API) picks up a missing-cryptographic-step flaw, and Windows DNS Client shows up three separate times across the list, twice for improper access control and once for missing authentication on a critical function. DNS resolution having this many tampering paths in one release is worth flagging as a pattern rather than three unrelated bugs. The one genuinely different entry is Outlook Copilot, described simply as vulnerable to “malicious uses” enabling tampering over the network. That’s a fantastically vague phrasing for an AI-assistant feature, continuing this year's running theme of Copilot-branded features showing up somewhere in every release. Finally, a .NET link-following bug and a WSL2 kernel race condition receive patches. Both require local/authorized access to trigger.</p><p class="">Still with me? Good, because we have 35 DoS bugs to cover, and this is really an identity-infrastructure story more than a grab-bag. Active Directory Federation Services alone accounts for seven of them, all sitting at CVSS 7.5, all stack-based buffer overflows or infinite loops that let an unauthenticated attacker knock the service over the network.  The .NET ecosystem is the other big cluster: .NET, .NET Framework, and ASP.NET Core/OData contribute nine bugs combined, almost all “allocation of resources without limits or throttling”.  HTTP.sys and HTTP/2 pick up the same flavor. LSASS shows up twice, which is always worth a second look given what that process actually holds. Rounding out the list are patches for Windows DHCP Server, SMB Server, Secure Channel, Hyper-V, and IKE Protocol each take a single hit, mostly requiring authorized or adjacent-network access rather than being wide open to the internet.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">The next Patch Tuesday will be on August 11, just after Hacker Summer Camp in sunny Las Vegas. Should I survive the heat, I’ll be back then to give you my full thoughts on the release – no matter how large it may be. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The March 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I am back in the friendly confines of the Mid-South headquarters of TrendAI ZDI (a.k.a. my home office), and am all set for the third patch Tuesday of 2026. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.If you’d...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694472/it-security-nachrichten/the-march-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694472/it-security-nachrichten/the-march-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I am back in the friendly confines of the Mid-South headquarters of TrendAI ZDI (a.k.a. my home office), and am all set for the third patch Tuesday of 2026. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for March 2026</strong></p><p class="">For March, Adobe released eight bulletins addressing 80 unique CVEs in Adobe Acrobat Reader, Commerce, Illustrator, Substance 3D Painter, Premier Pro, Experience Manager, Substance 3D Stager, and the Adobe DNG Software Development Kit (SDK). Two of these bugs were submitted through the TrendAI ZDI program. If you need to prioritize, the update for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-26.html">Acrobat</a> likely has the most impact, with the patch fixing two Critical-rated and one Important bugs. The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-24.html">Experience Manager</a> is the largest this month with 33 CVEs addressed. However, these are simple cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs, so it’s not too exciting. The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-05.html">Commerce</a> is also quite large with 19 CVEs. Most of these are also XSS bugs, but there’s a few security feature bypass bugs in there, too. Adobe actually gives this patch a deployment priority of 2, but it’s not under active attack at the time of release. </p><p class="">The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-18.html">Illustrator</a> corrects seven bugs, including a few Critical-rated ones. The patch for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_painter/apsb26-25.html">Substance 3D Painter</a> fixes nine different CVEs, all rated Important. That’s not the case for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_stager/apsb26-29.html">Substance 3D Stager</a>, which fixes six different Critical bugs that could lead to arbitrary code execution. The patch for the <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dng-sdk/apsb26-30.html">Adobe DNG Software Development Kit</a> (SDK) addresses one Critical and one Important bug. Finally, the update for Premiere Pro correct a single, Critical-rated bug that could lead to arbitrary code execution. </p><p class="">None of the bugs fixed by Adobe this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release, and beyond the update for Commerce, all of the other updates released by Adobe this month are listed as deployment priority 3.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for March 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released 84 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, SQL Server, Hyper-V Server, and the Windows Resilient File System (ReFS). Counting the third-party and Chromium updates listed in the release, it brings to total number of CVEs to 94. Five of these bugs were reported through the TrendAI ZDI program. Eight of these bugs are rated Critical, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">This volume is relatively typical for a March release, and the lack of bugs under active attack is a nice change from last month. There are two vulnerabilities listed as publicly known at the time of release, but none listed as actively exploited.</p><p class="">Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with a bug with an AI slant:</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26144"><strong>CVE-2026-26144</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability<br></strong>This is a fascinating bug and an attack scenario we’re likely to see more often. The vulnerability is a simple cross-site scripting (XSS) bug in Excel, but an attacker could use it to cause the Copilot Agent to exfiltrate data off the target. This essentially makes it a zero-click information disclosure. Although not stated, the disclosure is likely at the level of the logged-on user, so there isn’t a privilege escalation component. Info disclosures rarely get rated Critical, but it makes sense here.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26110"><strong>CVE-2026-26110</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26113"><strong>CVE-2026-26113</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability <br></strong>Another month and another pair of Office bugs where the Preview Pane is an exploit vector. I’ve lost count of how many of these bugs have been patched over the last year, but it’s just a matter of time until they start appearing in active exploits. The latest versions of Outlook allow you to hide the Preview Pane, but it isn’t clear if this would mitigate these attacks. The best option is still to test and deploy the update, but considering how many of these patches exist, it’s likely further updates will be needed to fully address these issues.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23669"><strong>CVE-2026-23669</strong></a><strong> - Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Just reading the title makes me twitch with remembrances of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PrintNightmare">Print Nightmare</a> from a few years ago. This bug works in the same manner as those exploits. An authenticated attacker sends specially crafted messages to an affected system to gain arbitrary code execution. No user interaction is required. Let’s hope we don’t end up in a new nightmare of spooler exploits. Test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23668"><strong>CVE-2026-23668</strong></a><strong> - Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This vulnerability was submitted to the ZDI program by Marcin Wiązowski as two separate bugs, and it demonstrates the need for variant investigations when creating security patches. Both cases are caused by the lack of proper locking when performing operations on an object. However, in one case, it’s in the cdd.dll driver while the other is in the win32kfull driver. Either way, an attacker could use these to elevate privileges to SYSTEM and execute arbitrary code. Since the fix for both is to add object locking to the GDI object, the cases are combined into a single CVE. That’s not a problem, but it does show how variants can occur, and fixes should be as broad as possible.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for March 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026_PatchTable-March.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="953">
 <col width="151" class="xl65">
 <col width="263" class="xl66">
 <col width="111" class="xl67" span="4">
 <col width="95" class="xl67">
 <col width="645" class="xl65">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="151" class="xl65" height="47"><span> </span>CVE<span> </span></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Title<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Severity<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>CVSS<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Public</td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Exploited<span> </span></td>
  <td width="95" class="xl67"><span> </span>Type<span> </span></td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26127"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26127<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>.NET Denial of Service Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21262"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21262<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23651"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23651<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26124"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26124<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26122"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26122<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21536"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21536<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Devices Pricing Program Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26144"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26144<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26110"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26110<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26113"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26113<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26125"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26125<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Payment Orchestrator Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.6</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26131"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26131<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>.NET Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25177"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25177<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Active Directory Domain Services Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26117"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26117<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Arc Enabled Servers - Azure Connected
  Machine Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26130"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26130<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>ASP.NET Core Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23661"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23661<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23662"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23662<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23664"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23664<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26121"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26121<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IOT Explorer Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26118"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26118<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure MCP Server Tools Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23667"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23667<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Broadcast DVR Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25190"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25190<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GDI Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25181"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25181<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GDI+ Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="97">
  <td class="xl72" height="97"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26030"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26030 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GitHub: CVE-2026-26030 Microsoft Semantic
  Kernel InMemoryVectorStore filter functionality vulnerable<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23654"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23654 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GitHub: Zero Shot SCFoundation Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26141"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26141<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Hybrid Worker Extension (Arc-enabled Windows
  VMs) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23665"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23665 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Linux Azure Diagnostic extension (LAD)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23674"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23674<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>MapUrlToZone Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26123"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26123<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Authenticator Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26148"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26148 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Azure AD SSH Login extension for
  Linux Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25167"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25167<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26107"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26107<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26108"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26108<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26109"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26109<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26112"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26112<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26134"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26134<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26106"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26106<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26114"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26114<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26105"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26105<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24283"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24283<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Multiple UNC Provider Kernel Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25165"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25165<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Performance Counters for Windows Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24282"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24282<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Push message Routing Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26115"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26115<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26116"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26116<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20967"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-20967<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24285"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24285<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Win32k Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24291"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24291<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Accessibility Infrastructure
  (ATBroker.exe) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25186"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25186<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Accessibility Infrastructure
  (ATBroker.exe) Information Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23660"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23660 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Admin Center in Azure Portal
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24293"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24293<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25176"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25176<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25178"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25178<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25179"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25179<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23656"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23656<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows App Installer Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25171"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25171<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Authentication Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23671"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23671<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Bluetooth RFCOM Protocol Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24292"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24292<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Connected Devices Platform Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24295"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24295<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Device Association Service Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24296"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24296<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Device Association Service Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25189"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25189<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows DWM Core Library Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25174"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25174<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Extensible File Allocation Table
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25168"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25168<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25169"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25169<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23668"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23668<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25180"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25180<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25170"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25170<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24297"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24297<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kerberos Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24287"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24287<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24289"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24289<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26132"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26132<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24288"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24288<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Mobile Broadband Driver Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25175"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25175<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23669"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23669<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24290"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24290<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Projected File System Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23673"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23673<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25172"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25172<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25173"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25173<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26111"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26111<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25185"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25185<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Shell Link Processing Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24294"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24294<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26128"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26128<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25166"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25166<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows System Image Manager Assessment and
  Deployment Kit (ADK) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25188"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25188<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Telephony Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23672"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23672<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Universal Disk Format File System
  Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25187"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25187<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Winlogon Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3536"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3536 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3536 Integer overflow in
  ANGLE<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3538"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3538 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3538 Integer overflow in
  Skia<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3539"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3539 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3539 Object lifecycle
  issue in DevTools<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3540"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3540 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3540 Inappropriate
  implementation in WebAudio<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3541"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3541 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3541 Inappropriate
  implementation in CSS<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3542"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3542 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3542 Inappropriate
  implementation in WebAssembly<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3543"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3543 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3543 Inappropriate
  implementation in V8<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3544"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3544 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3544 Heap buffer overflow
  in WebCodecs<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3545"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3545 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3545 Insufficient data
  validation in Navigation<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="151"></td>
  <td width="263"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="95"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this month’s release, they are all cloud-native and require no user action. Microsoft has already remediated the vulnerabilities.</p><p class="">Moving on to the other code execution bugs, the vulnerabilities in SharePoint Server pop out first. Both require authentication, but it’s essentially the lowest level of authentication, so these would be ideal cases for lateral movement within an enterprise. There are the standard open-and-own cases within Office components. There an interesting sounding bug in the Windows Mobile Broadband Driver that requires physical access, but Microsoft doesn’t elaborate on the attack scenario beyond that fact. The bug in the System Image Manager Assessment and Deployment Kit (ADK) requires authentication. The bug in GDI requires user interaction. The remaining code execution bugs are in the RRAS protocol. We’ve seen bugs in this component in the past, but never in the wild. I wouldn’t ignore these, but I wouldn’t rush them out either.</p><p class="">Similar to last month, updates for Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs make up nearly half of this month’s release. And as we saw last month, but most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges. The bugs in SQL Server allow attackers to elevate to SQL sysadmin privileges. The bug in the Azure MCP Server is more complex. It allows attackers to obtain the permissions associated with the MCP Server’s managed identity, which lets them perform actions that the managed identity is able to reach. The bug in the Azure AD SSH Login extension for Linux leads to root access, and it won’t be easy to patch. You’ll need to run the update instructions from the command line on each affected system. That’s the same case for the bug in the Linux Azure Diagnostic extension (LAD). There’s an odd bug in the Hybrid Worker Extension (Arc‑enabled Windows VMs) that leads to “ELEVATED” privileges, which is something I’ve never seen before. The bug in the Broadcast DVR component allows an attacker to go from low integrity level up to medium. There’s a bug listed as an EoP in the Push message Routing Service, but reading the description, Microsoft notes it could lead to an information disclosure. It’s likely this is an error and should be an Information Disclosure bug. The final EoP is in the Azure Portal Windows Admin Center and leads to SYSTEM. However, there’s no patch to remediate this bug. Instead, you need to install the latest version of the Windows Admin Center extension through the Azure Portal by hand. </p><p class="">There are two security feature bypass patches in the March release. The first is a bypass of the MapURLToZone method, which (as expected) allows attackers to bypass MapURLToZone protections. The third bypass is in Kerberos and could allow an attacker to either view some sensitive information or make changes to “disclosed” information. This is a race condition that occurs while the group policy is being reapplied, so the window to exploit this would be extremely small.</p><p class="">Looking at the remaining info disclosure bugs getting patched this month, only two result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. Ther others provide more interesting results. There are three bugs in the Azure IoT Explorer have some wide-ranging implications. According to Microsoft, exploitation could result in, “device connection information, authentication tokens, request data, file paths, and other information transmitted between the application and the IoT Hub.” The bug in Authenticator almost reads like a security feature bypass, as exploit results in the disclosure of a one‑time sign‑in code or authentication deep link. The attacker would receive the sign‑in information and could potentially use it to authenticate as the user, allowing access to information or services available to that account. The last info disclosure bug is in the Accessibility Infrastructure and allows an attacker to gain secrets or privileged information belonging to the user of the affected application.</p><p class="">There are only four spoofing bugs in the March release. The first is in SharePoint server and manifests as an XSS. The second bug is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the Azure IoT Explorer. The remaining two are a bit more cryptic. The bug in Windows Shell Link Processing results from the “exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor,” and could lead to spoofing. That sounds like credential exposure, but it’s not explicitly called out. The final spoofing bug results from the insufficient verification of data authenticity in Windows App Installer. Again, this sounds vaguely like credential reflection, but without further information, we can only speculate. </p><p class="">Finally, there are four denial-of-service (DoS) bugs in the release, including one that’s listed as publicly known in the .NET Framework. As usual, Microsoft provides no actionable information about these bugs.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">I plan on being at RSA for the first time in my career, so if you’re around, please stop by and say hello. I like it when people say hello. Otherwise, I’ll be back on April 14 with my assessment of that patch Tuesday release. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The April 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It’s time once again for Patch Tuesday, and this one is huge. We’ve also got multiple exploits in the wild, which adds another layer of urgency to this month’s release. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities, and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Micro...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694470/it-security-nachrichten/the-april-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694470/it-security-nachrichten/the-april-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">It’s time once again for Patch Tuesday, and this one is huge. We’ve also got multiple exploits in the wild, which adds another layer of urgency to this month’s release. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities, and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for April 2026</strong></p><p class="">For April, Adobe released 12 bulletins addressing 61 unique CVEs in Adobe Acrobat Reader, InDesign, InCopy, FrameMaker, Connect, ColdFusion, Bridge, Photoshop, Illustrator, Experience Manager Screens, and the Adobe DNG SDK. Three of the Cold Fusion bugs came through the TrendAI ZDI program. For this month, I’m introducing an Adobe table as well. I’d love to get your feedback on whether this is helpful.</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-43.html" target="_blank">APSB26-43</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Acrobat Reader</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>Yes</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-44.html" target="_blank">APSB26-44</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Acrobat Reader</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/indesign/apsb26-32.html" target="_blank">APSB26-32</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InDesign</td>
    <td>9</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/incopy/apsb26-33.html" target="_blank">APSB26-33</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InCopy</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/framemaker/apsb26-36.html" target="_blank">APSB26-36</a></td>
    <td>Adobe FrameMaker</td>
    <td>11</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/connect/apsb26-37.html" target="_blank">APSB26-37</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Connect</td>
    <td>9</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-38.html" target="_blank">APSB26-38</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>7</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb26-39.html" target="_blank">APSB26-39</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Bridge</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/photoshop/apsb26-40.html" target="_blank">APSB26-40</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Photoshop</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-42.html" target="_blank">APSB26-42</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Illustrator</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/aem-screens/apsb26-34.html" target="_blank">APSB26-34</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager Screens</td>
    <td>9</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>5.4</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dng-sdk/apsb26-41.html" target="_blank">APSB26-41</a></td>
    <td>Adobe DNG SDK</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>5.5</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">Obviously, the active attack in Reader is the highest priority for this month, but don’t ignore the second bunch of Reader patches. Cold Fusion also gets a deployment priority of 1, so if you’re still running that platform, make sure you get the update. Otherwise, the FrameMaker and Connect patches fix 11 and nine bugs, respectively. InDesign and Experience Manager Screens also have nine CVEs addressed. </p><p class="">Outside of the Reader bug, none of the other bugs fixed by Adobe this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release. One of the Reader bugs and Cold Fusion have a deployment priority of one, the other Reader bug has a priority of two, while all of the other updates released by Adobe this month are listed as deployment priority 3.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for April 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released a monstrous 163 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, SQL Server, Hyper-V Server, BitLocker, and the Windows Wallet Service. Counting the third-party and a huge Chromium release, it brings the total number of CVEs to a staggering 247 updates. Six of these bugs were reported through the TrendAI ZDI program. Eight of these bugs are rated Critical, two are rated as Moderate, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">By my count, this is the second-largest monthly release in Microsoft’s history. There are many things we could speculate on to justify the size, but if Microsoft is like the other programs out there (including ours), they are likely seeing a rise in submissions found by AI tools. For us, our incoming rate has essentially tripled, making triage a challenge, to say the least. Whatever the reason, we have a lot of bugs to deal with this month. I should also point out that the Pwn2Own Berlin occurs next month, and it’s typical for vendors to patch as much as they can before the event.</p><p class="">There is one Microsoft bug listed as under active attack at the time of release, and one other that’s publicly known. Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the vulnerability being exploited in the wild:</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32201" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-32201</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability<br></strong>Microsoft doesn’t provide a lot of information about this bug, but Spoofing bugs in SharePoint often manifest as cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs. They do note that attackers could view information or make changes to disclosed information. As always, they don’t provide any information on how widespread these attacks are, but I wouldn’t wait to test and deploy this fix – especially if you have internet-connected SharePoint servers.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33825" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-33825</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug is listed as publicly known, and this time, we know exactly <a href="https://deadeclipse666.blogspot.com/2026/04/public-disclosure.html" target="_blank">where</a> it was disclosed. There have been some questions about how exploitable this bug may be, but it does look like it’s a real problem – just with some reliability issues in its current state. I won’t add on to the commentary from the researcher about working with Microsoft. I’m just glad they are offering a fix for the vulnerability. If you rely on Defender, test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-   <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33827" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-33827</strong></a><strong> - Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This vulnerability allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to exploit code on affected systems without user interaction. That adds up to a wormable bug – at least on systems with IPv6 and IPSec enabled. It is a race condition, which sets exploitability to High on the CVSS scale, but we see race conditions exploited at Pwn2Own all the time, so don’t rely on that obstacle. If you’re running IPv6, I would test and deploy this fix quickly before public exploits become available.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33824" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-33824</strong></a><strong> - Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Service Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Speaking of wormable bugs, here’s our second one this month. By the title, we can tell that systems with IKE enabled are affected, but that leaves plenty of targets for attackers. Microsoft also notes a significant mitigation for this bug. Blocking UDP ports 500 and 4500 at the perimeter prevents external attackers from reaching the affected service. However, insiders could still target this for lateral movement within an enterprise. For enterprises using IKE, get this fix tested and deployed with haste.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for April 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    




<title>April 2026 Patch Tuesday</title>



<table>
<thead><tr>
  <th>CVE</th>
  <th>Title</th>
  <th>Severity</th>
  <th>CVSS</th>
  <th>Public</th>
  <th>Exploited</th>
  <th>Type</th>
</tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32201">CVE-2026-32201</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Yes</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5281">CVE-2026-5281 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5281 Use after free in Dawn</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Yes</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33825">CVE-2026-33825</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>Yes</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23666">CVE-2026-23666</a></td>
  <td>.NET Framework Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32190">CVE-2026-32190</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33114">CVE-2026-33114</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33115">CVE-2026-33115</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32157">CVE-2026-32157</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33826">CVE-2026-33826</a></td>
  <td>Windows Active Directory Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33824">CVE-2026-33824</a></td>
  <td>Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Service Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>9.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33827">CVE-2026-33827</a></td>
  <td>Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26171">CVE-2026-26171</a></td>
  <td>.NET Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32226">CVE-2026-32226</a></td>
  <td>.NET Framework Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.9</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32178">CVE-2026-32178</a></td>
  <td>.NET Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32203">CVE-2026-32203</a></td>
  <td>.NET and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33116">CVE-2026-33116</a></td>
  <td>.NET, .NET Framework, and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2023-20585">CVE-2023-20585 *</a></td>
  <td>AMD: CVE-2023-20585 IOMMU Write Buffer Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32072">CVE-2026-32072</a></td>
  <td>Active Directory Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.2</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25184">CVE-2026-25184</a></td>
  <td>Applocker Filter Driver (applockerfltr.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32171">CVE-2026-32171</a></td>
  <td>Azure Logic Apps Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32168">CVE-2026-32168</a></td>
  <td>Azure Monitor Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32192">CVE-2026-32192</a></td>
  <td>Azure Monitor Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32181">CVE-2026-32181</a></td>
  <td>Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27924">CVE-2026-27924</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32152">CVE-2026-32152</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32154">CVE-2026-32154</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27923">CVE-2026-27923</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32155">CVE-2026-32155</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23653">CVE-2026-23653</a></td>
  <td>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32631">CVE-2026-23653 *</a></td>
  <td> GitHub: CVE-2026-32631 'git clone' from manipulated repositories can leak NTLM hashes </td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33096">CVE-2026-33096</a></td>
  <td>HTTP.sys Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25250">CVE-2026-25250 *</a></td>
  <td>MITRE: CVE-2026-25250 Secure Boot disable Eazy Fix</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26181">CVE-2026-26181</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32219">CVE-2026-32219</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32091">CVE-2026-32091</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26152">CVE-2026-26152</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Cryptographic Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33103">CVE-2026-33103</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Dynamics 365 (On-Premises) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32188">CVE-2026-32188</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32189">CVE-2026-32189</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32197">CVE-2026-32197</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32198">CVE-2026-32198</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32199">CVE-2026-32199</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32184">CVE-2026-32184</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft High Performance Compute (HPC) Pack Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26155">CVE-2026-26155</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Local Security Authority Subsystem Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27914">CVE-2026-27914</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Management Console Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26149">CVE-2026-26149</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Power Apps Security Feature Bypass</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>9</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32200">CVE-2026-32200</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft PowerPoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26143">CVE-2026-26143</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft PowerShell Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33120">CVE-2026-33120 †</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20945">CVE-2026-20945</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33822">CVE-2026-33822</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33095">CVE-2026-33095</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23657">CVE-2026-23657</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32081">CVE-2026-32081</a></td>
  <td>Package Catalog Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26170">CVE-2026-26170</a></td>
  <td>PowerShell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26183">CVE-2026-26183</a></td>
  <td>Remote Access Management service/API (RPC server) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26160">CVE-2026-26160</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Licensing Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26159">CVE-2026-26159</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Licensing Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26151">CVE-2026-26151</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32085">CVE-2026-32085</a></td>
  <td>Remote Procedure Call Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32167">CVE-2026-32167</a></td>
  <td>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32176">CVE-2026-32176</a></td>
  <td>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-0390">CVE-2026-0390</a></td>
  <td>UEFI Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32220">CVE-2026-32220</a></td>
  <td>UEFI Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32212">CVE-2026-32212</a></td>
  <td>Universal Plug and Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32214">CVE-2026-32214</a></td>
  <td>Universal Plug and Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32079">CVE-2026-32079</a></td>
  <td>Web Account Manager Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33104">CVE-2026-33104</a></td>
  <td>Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32196">CVE-2026-32196</a></td>
  <td>Windows Admin Center Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26178">CVE-2026-26178</a></td>
  <td>Windows Advanced Rasterization Platform Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32073">CVE-2026-32073</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26168">CVE-2026-26168</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26173">CVE-2026-26173</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26177">CVE-2026-26177</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26182">CVE-2026-26182</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27922">CVE-2026-27922</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33099">CVE-2026-33099</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33100">CVE-2026-33100</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32088">CVE-2026-32088</a></td>
  <td>Windows Biometric Service Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27913">CVE-2026-27913</a></td>
  <td>Windows BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26175">CVE-2026-26175</a></td>
  <td>Windows Boot Manager Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32162">CVE-2026-32162</a></td>
  <td>Windows COM Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20806">CVE-2026-20806</a></td>
  <td>Windows COM Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26176">CVE-2026-26176</a></td>
  <td>Windows Client Side Caching driver (csc.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27926">CVE-2026-27926</a></td>
  <td>Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32070">CVE-2026-32070</a></td>
  <td>Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33098">CVE-2026-33098</a></td>
  <td>Windows Container Isolation FS Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26153">CVE-2026-26153</a></td>
  <td>Windows Encrypted File System (EFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32087">CVE-2026-32087</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32093">CVE-2026-32093</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32086">CVE-2026-32086</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32150">CVE-2026-32150</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27931">CVE-2026-27931</a></td>
  <td>Windows GDI Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27930">CVE-2026-27930</a></td>
  <td>Windows GDI Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32221">CVE-2026-32221</a></td>
  <td>Windows Graphics Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27906">CVE-2026-27906</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hello Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27928">CVE-2026-27928</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hello Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26156">CVE-2026-26156</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32149">CVE-2026-32149</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27910">CVE-2026-27910</a></td>
  <td>Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27912">CVE-2026-27912</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kerberos Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26179">CVE-2026-26179</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26180">CVE-2026-26180</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32195">CVE-2026-32195</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26163">CVE-2026-26163</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32215">CVE-2026-32215</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32217">CVE-2026-32217</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32218">CVE-2026-32218</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26169">CVE-2026-26169</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Memory Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27929">CVE-2026-27929</a></td>
  <td>Windows LUA File Virtualization Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32071">CVE-2026-32071</a></td>
  <td>Windows Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20930">CVE-2026-20930</a></td>
  <td>Windows Management Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26162">CVE-2026-26162</a></td>
  <td>Windows OLE Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33101">CVE-2026-33101</a></td>
  <td>Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32084">CVE-2026-32084</a></td>
  <td>Windows Print Spooler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27927">CVE-2026-27927</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26184">CVE-2026-26184</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32069">CVE-2026-32069</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32074">CVE-2026-32074</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32078">CVE-2026-32078</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26167">CVE-2026-26167</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32158">CVE-2026-32158</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32159">CVE-2026-32159</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32160">CVE-2026-32160</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26172">CVE-2026-26172</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20928">CVE-2026-20928</a></td>
  <td>Windows Recovery Environment Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32216">CVE-2026-32216</a></td>
  <td>Windows Redirected Drive Buffering System Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27909">CVE-2026-27909</a></td>
  <td>Windows Search Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26161">CVE-2026-26161</a></td>
  <td>Windows Sensor Data Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26174">CVE-2026-26174</a></td>
  <td>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32224">CVE-2026-32224</a></td>
  <td>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26154">CVE-2026-26154</a></td>
  <td>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Tampering</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26165">CVE-2026-26165</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26166">CVE-2026-26166</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27918">CVE-2026-27918</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32151">CVE-2026-32151</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32225">CVE-2026-32225</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32202">CVE-2026-32202</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32082">CVE-2026-32082</a></td>
  <td>Windows Simple Search and Discovery Protocol (SSDP) Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32083">CVE-2026-32083</a></td>
  <td>Windows Simple Search and Discovery Protocol (SSDP) Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32068">CVE-2026-32068</a></td>
  <td>Windows Simple Search and Discovery Protocol (SSDP) Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32183">CVE-2026-32183</a></td>
  <td>Windows Snipping Tool Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32089">CVE-2026-32089</a></td>
  <td>Windows Speech Brokered Api Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32090">CVE-2026-32090</a></td>
  <td>Windows Speech Brokered Api Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32153">CVE-2026-32153</a></td>
  <td>Windows Speech Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27907">CVE-2026-27907</a></td>
  <td>Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32076">CVE-2026-32076</a></td>
  <td>Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27908">CVE-2026-27908</a></td>
  <td>Windows TDI Translation Driver (tdx.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27921">CVE-2026-27921</a></td>
  <td>Windows TDI Translation Driver (tdx.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27915">CVE-2026-27915</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27919">CVE-2026-27919</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32075">CVE-2026-32075</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27916">CVE-2026-27916</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27920">CVE-2026-27920</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32077">CVE-2026-32077</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27925">CVE-2026-27925</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32156">CVE-2026-32156</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32223">CVE-2026-32223</a></td>
  <td>Windows USB Printing Stack (usbprint.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32165">CVE-2026-32165</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27911">CVE-2026-27911</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32163">CVE-2026-32163</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32164">CVE-2026-32164</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23670">CVE-2026-23670</a></td>
  <td>Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27917">CVE-2026-27917</a></td>
  <td>Windows WFP NDIS Lightweight Filter Driver (wfplwfs.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32080">CVE-2026-32080</a></td>
  <td>Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32222">CVE-2026-32222</a></td>
  <td>Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21637">CVE-2026-21637 *</a></td>
  <td> HackerOne: CVE-2026-21637 TLS PSK/ALPN Callback Exceptions Bypass Error Handlers</td>
  <td> Moderate</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33119">CVE-2026-33119</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Moderate</td>
  <td>5.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33829">CVE-2026-33829</a></td>
  <td>Windows Snipping Tool Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Moderate</td>
  <td>4.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5858">CVE-2026-5858 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5858 Heap buffer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5859">CVE-2026-5859 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5859 Integer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5272">CVE-2026-5272 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5272 Heap buffer overflow in GPU</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5273">CVE-2026-5273 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5273 Use after free in CSS</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5274">CVE-2026-5274 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5274 Integer overflow in Codecs</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5275">CVE-2026-5275 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5275 Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5276">CVE-2026-5276 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5276 Insufficient policy enforcement in WebUSB</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5277">CVE-2026-5277 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5277 Integer overflow in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5279">CVE-2026-5279 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5279 Object corruption in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5280">CVE-2026-5280 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5280 Use after free in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5283">CVE-2026-5283 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5283 Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5284">CVE-2026-5284 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5284 Use after free in Dawn</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5285">CVE-2026-5285 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5285 Use after free in WebGL</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5286">CVE-2026-5286 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5286 Use after free in Dawn</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5287">CVE-2026-5287 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5287 Use after free in PDF</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5289">CVE-2026-5289 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5289 Use after free in Navigation</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5290">CVE-2026-5290 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5290 Use after free in Compositing</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5860">CVE-2026-5860 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5860 Use after free in WebRTC</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5861">CVE-2026-5861 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5861 Use after free in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5862">CVE-2026-5862 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5862 Inappropriate implementation in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5863">CVE-2026-5863 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5863 Inappropriate implementation in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5864">CVE-2026-5864 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5864 Heap buffer overflow in WebAudio</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5865">CVE-2026-5865 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5865 Type Confusion in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5866">CVE-2026-5866 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5866 Use after free in Media</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5867">CVE-2026-5867 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5867 Heap buffer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5868">CVE-2026-5868 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5868 Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5869">CVE-2026-5869 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5869 Heap buffer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5870">CVE-2026-5870 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5870 Integer overflow in Skia</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5871">CVE-2026-5871 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5871 Type Confusion in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5872">CVE-2026-5872 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5872 Use after free in Blink</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5873">CVE-2026-5873 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5873 Out of bounds read and write in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5291">CVE-2026-5291 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5291 Inappropriate implementation in WebGL</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5292">CVE-2026-5292 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5292 Out of bounds read in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5874">CVE-2026-5874 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5874 Use after free in PrivateAI</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5875">CVE-2026-5875 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5875 Policy bypass in Blink</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5876">CVE-2026-5876 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5876 Side-channel information leakage in Navigation</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5877">CVE-2026-5877 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5877 Use after free in Navigation</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5878">CVE-2026-5878 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5878 Incorrect security UI in Blink</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5879">CVE-2026-5879 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5879 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5880">CVE-2026-5880 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5880 Incorrect security UI in browser UI</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5881">CVE-2026-5881 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5881 Policy bypass in LocalNetworkAccess</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5882">CVE-2026-5882 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5882 Incorrect security UI in Fullscreen</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5883">CVE-2026-5883 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5883 Use after free in Media</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5884">CVE-2026-5884 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5884 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5885">CVE-2026-5885 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5885 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebML</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5886">CVE-2026-5886 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5886 Out of bounds read in WebAudio</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5887">CVE-2026-5887 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5887 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Downloads</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5888">CVE-2026-5888 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5888 Uninitialized Use in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5889">CVE-2026-5889 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5889 Cryptographic Flaw in PDFium</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5890">CVE-2026-5890 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5890 Race in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5891">CVE-2026-5891 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5891 Insufficient policy enforcement in browser UI</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5892">CVE-2026-5892 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5892 Insufficient policy enforcement in PWAs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5893">CVE-2026-5893 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5893 Race in V8</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5894">CVE-2026-5894 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5894 Inappropriate implementation in PDF</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5895">CVE-2026-5895 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5895 Incorrect security UI in Omnibox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5896">CVE-2026-5896 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5896 Policy bypass in Audio</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5897">CVE-2026-5897 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5897 Incorrect security UI in Downloads</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5898">CVE-2026-5898 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5898 Incorrect security UI in Omnibox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5899">CVE-2026-5899 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5899 Incorrect security UI in History Navigation</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5900">CVE-2026-5900 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5900 Policy bypass in Downloads</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5901">CVE-2026-5901 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5901 Policy bypass in DevTools</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5902">CVE-2026-5902 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5902 Race in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5903">CVE-2026-5903 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5903 Policy bypass in IFrameSandbox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5904">CVE-2026-5904 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5904 Use after free in V8</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5905">CVE-2026-5905 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5905 Incorrect security UI in Permissions</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5906">CVE-2026-5906 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5906 Incorrect security UI in Omnibox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5907">CVE-2026-5907 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5907 Insufficient data validation in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5908">CVE-2026-5908 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5908 Integer overflow in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5909">CVE-2026-5909 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5909 Integer overflow in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5910">CVE-2026-5910 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5910 Integer overflow in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5911">CVE-2026-5911 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5911 Policy bypass in ServiceWorkers</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5912">CVE-2026-5912 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5912 Integer overflow in WebRTC</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5913">CVE-2026-5913 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5913 Out of bounds read in Blink</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5914">CVE-2026-5914 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5914 Type Confusion in CSS</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5915">CVE-2026-5915 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5915 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebML</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5918">CVE-2026-5918 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5918 Inappropriate implementation in Navigation</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5919">CVE-2026-5919 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5919 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebSockets</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33118">CVE-2026-33118</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>4.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this month’s release, there are three Office-related bugs where the Preview Pane is once again listed as an exploit vector. I would still like to have a full-proof way of disabling the Preview Pane, but I don’t see that as an option. There’s a bug in the RDP client, but that involves connecting to a malicious RDP server. The bug in Active Directory requires authentication and a network adjacent attacker. The final Critical-rated bug is an interesting DoS in .NET Framework. An unauthenticated attacker could deny service over a network – presumably crippling any affected app made in .NET. You rarely see Critical-rated DoS bugs, but this one deserves the moniker.</p><p class="">Moving on to the other code execution bugs, you have quite a few open-and-own bugs in Office components, most notably Excel, where the Preview Pane is not an attack vector. The bug in SQL Server requires authentication, and as usual, additional steps are needed to ensure you have the correct update to remediate this vulnerability. The two bugs in Hyper-V almost reads like a privilege escalation since it allows unauthorized attackers to execute code locally. That’s the same for the bugs in the Windows Snipping Tool and the UPnP Device host. </p><p class="">More than half of this release addresses Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs. However, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. The bugs in SQL Server could allow an attacker to gain SQL sysadmin privileges. One of the kernel bugs simply states an attacker could “elevate privileges locally”. How obtuse. That’s similar for the bug in afd.sys and Desktop Windows Manager, but Microsoft also states that these bugs could crash an affected system. There are several bugs that result in a sandbox escape, including Windows Push Notifications, AFD for Winsock, Management Services, and User Interface Core. Of these, CVE-2026-26167 (Push Notifications) is the most notable — it's the only one with low attack complexity, meaning no race condition needed. The rest all require winning a race condition (AC:H). The bugs in UPnP are interesting as they allow attackers to gain access to a limited set of administrator-protected objects. Not a full escalation but definitely getting access to resources they shouldn’t. The vulnerability in the Brokering File System allows attackers to gain the level of the logged on user, so don’t do your normal activities as a user with admin privileges. The bug in Azure Monitor Agent leads to root-level access. </p><p class="">There are a dozen different security features bypass bugs in the April release. Some of these are obvious by the title alone. For example, the bugs in Windows Hello bypass safety features within the Hello app itself. The bug in the Biometric Service allows attackers to bypass biometric protections. The vulns in BitLocker and Secure Boot bypass protections in those components. The bug in Power Apps allows attackers to bypass a security warning dialog and trick targets into triggering an external protocol call that performs unintended actions on the user’s device. The bug in Windows Shell allows attackers to bypass Mark of the Web (MotW) protections. The bug in PowerShell could almost be described as a code execution bug as exploiting it bypasses dynamic-expression security checks, which could result in code execution. The vulnerability in the Windows Recovery Environment allows local attackers to bypass BitLocker device encryption. Finally, the bug in Virtualization‑Based Security (VBS) is the most interesting of the bunch – and not just because VBS is a (relatively) new feature. The problem allows attackers to manipulate allow a compromised Windows kernel to modify memory belonging to the secure kernel, breaking the intended isolation guarantees provided by VBS. Somewhat of a sandbox escape, but this time, you’re escaping from Virtual Trust Level 0 (VTL0) to Virtual Trust Level 1 (VTL1). Neat.</p><p class="">Moving on to the Information Disclosure bugs fixed this month, we have 20 different CVEs. Fortunately, most of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. While useful in crafting exploits, they aren’t exactly exciting on their own. There are also several bugs that disclose addresses from an object a contained in a sandboxed execution environment. This includes bugs in the Print Spooler, Package Catalog, and Web Account Manager. The bug in Dynamics 365 discloses the ever ineffable “sensitive information”. There are three different info disclosure bugs in UPnP. Two allow an attacker to read from the file system, while the third discloses anything available to the LOCAL SERVICE account. The final info disclosure bug resides in Copilot and Visual Studio and allows attackers to disclose the contents of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) when using Copilot. There are those who think MCP is dead (thanks to agentic AI agents), but if you’re using a custom MCP, I doubt you would want it leaked.</p><p class="">The April release contains just a handful of Spoofing bugs. Some, like the bugs in .NET, Active Directory, and Windows Shell, just say that they allow spoofing over a network. Others, like the bug in Windows Snipping Tool, say similar but also note that it could be used to relay NTLMv2 hashes. The patch for RDP <a href="https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=2347342">notes</a> that there are new warning dialogs coming this month. The bug in the Windows Admin Center would allow an attacker to interact with other tenant’s applications and content. Finally, the spoofing bug in SharePoint is another XSS issue.</p><p class="">There are eight DoS bugs in the April release, but as always, Microsoft provides no actionable information about the vulnerabilities. Microsoft does offer a mitigation for the http.sys bug that can be applied while you test and deploy the patch, but I would rely on the patch rather than the mitigation. Another exception is the bug for Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service, which allows attackers to deny service locally rather than over the network.</p><p class="">The final(!) bug in the April release is a Tampering bug in WSUS that reads like a DoS. According to Microsoft, “An attacker can send specially crafted packets which could affect availability of the service and result in Denial of Service (DoS).” But sure – let’s call it Tampering. </p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">I will be in Berlin for the next Patch Tuesday, which will be May 12, and I’ll provide my full thoughts then on what will hopefully be a smaller release than this one. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Russian State-Supported Cyber Actors Conduct Phishing Campaign Targeting Users of Zimbra Collaboration Suite]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Russian State-Supported Cyber Actors Conduct Phishing Campaign Targeting Users of Zimbra Collaboration Suite
Executive summary 
A group of Russian state-supported cyber actors has been targeting and compromising various Western government and commercial organizations using the Zimbra Collaboratio...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694430/it-security-nachrichten/russian-state-supported-cyber-actors-conduct-phishing-campaign-targeting-users-of-zimbra-collaboration-suite/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694430/it-security-nachrichten/russian-state-supported-cyber-actors-conduct-phishing-campaign-targeting-users-of-zimbra-collaboration-suite/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:59:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="c-page-title__buttons"><a class="c-button" href="https://media.defense.gov/2026/Jul/22/2003965244/-1/-1/1/CSA_RUSSIA_PHISHING_TARGET_ZIMBRA.PDF">Russian State-Supported Cyber Actors Conduct Phishing Campaign Targeting Users of Zimbra Collaboration Suite</a></div>
<h2><strong>Executive summary</strong> </h2>
<p>A group of Russian state-supported cyber actors has been targeting and compromising various Western government and commercial organizations using the Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) software since at least July 2025. The Russian state-supported advanced persistent threat (APT) group’s activity is tracked in the cybersecurity community under several names (see <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#cyber1">Cybersecurity industry tracking</a>), primarily as “LAUNDRY BEAR,” a name initially coined by the Netherlands General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD) and Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD) [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc1">1</a>].</p>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR’s targeting is almost certainly to gather sensitive information for the Russian Federation, with these actors primarily focusing on the covert acquisition of email data. Previous campaigns indicated LAUNDRY BEAR relied on unsophisticated initial access techniques—including password spraying, phishing, and pass-the-cookie—allowing the group to successfully run high-volume operations. The latest campaign targeting ZCS uses a novel exploit that was a zero-day vulnerability when first exploited and continues to be successfully exploited. The vulnerability, Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a>, was patched in November 2025. This demonstrates LAUNDRY BEAR’s intent and ability to deploy increasingly sophisticated technical capabilities.</p>
<p>Unlike traditional phishing campaigns that persuade a user into taking an action, such as clicking a link or opening a file, LAUNDRY BEAR’s latest campaign leverages a view-based exploit that only requires a user to view a malicious email within a vulnerable version of the webmail service. Once viewed, the exploit attempts to exfiltrate the victim’s last 90 days of email communications, the organization email directory (i.e., Global Address List [GAL]), and other sensitive information to servers controlled by LAUNDRY BEAR. The exploit also attempts to establish persistent access to victim accounts through a variety of means as detailed in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#persistence1">Persistence and credential access</a> section.</p>
<p>This Cybersecurity Advisory (CSA) warns of this ongoing malicious threat activity and urges organizations to update their vulnerable software and implement additional mitigations to thwart these Russian state-supported actors’ continued success. The CSA is being released by the following authoring and co-sealing agencies:</p>
<ul>
<li>United States National Security Agency (NSA)</li>
<li>United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)</li>
<li>Netherlands Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD)</li>
<li>Netherlands General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD)</li>
<li>United States Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)</li>
<li>United States Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA)</li>
<li>United States Department of Defense Cyber Crime Center (DC3)</li>
<li>United States Department of the Treasury</li>
<li>United States Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS)</li>
<li>Australian Signals Directorate’s Australian Cyber Security Centre (ASD’s ACSC)</li>
<li>Communications Security Establishment Canada’s (CSE’s) Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (Cyber Centre)</li>
<li>New Zealand National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-NZ)</li>
<li>United Kingdom National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-UK)</li>
<li>Czech Republic National Cyber and Information Security Agency (NÚKIB)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f1"><sup>1</sup></a></li>
<li>Danish Defence Intelligence Service (DDIS)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f2"><sup>2</sup></a></li>
<li>Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service (EFIS)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f3"><sup>3</sup></a></li>
<li>Finnish Defence Intelligence (FDI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f4"><sup>4</sup></a></li>
<li>Finnish Security and Intelligence Service (SUPO)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f5"><sup>5</sup></a></li>
<li>French General Directorate for Internal Security (DGSI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f6"><sup>6</sup></a></li>
<li>French National Cybersecurity Agency (ANSSI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f7"><sup>7</sup></a></li>
<li>Italian External Intelligence and Security Agency (AISE)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f8"><sup>8</sup></a></li>
<li>Italian Internal Intelligence and Security Agency (AISI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f9"><sup>9</sup></a></li>
<li>Security and Intelligence Service of the Republic of Moldova (SIS RM)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f10"><sup>10</sup></a></li>
<li>Polish Foreign Intelligence Agency (AW)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f11"><sup>11</sup></a></li>
<li>The Military Counterintelligence Service of Poland (SKW)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f12"><sup>12</sup></a></li>
<li>Spain National Intelligence Centre (CNI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f13"><sup>13</sup></a></li>
<li>Sweden National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-SE)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f14"><sup>14</sup></a></li>
</ul>
<p>The authoring agencies urge any organizations using ZCS to implement the recommendations listed within the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#mitigations1">Mitigations</a> section of this advisory to reduce the risk associated with this activity. This CSA also includes specific remediations for organizations to implement if they discover the presence of the listed <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#ioc1">Indicators of compromise</a> (IOCs).  </p>
<p>As more organizations update their ZCS software based on this CSA, LAUNDRY BEAR may discontinue the current campaign exploiting this vulnerability; however, based on the success of this and previous campaigns, it is very likely that the group will continue to target ZCS and other email systems used by organizations in Western countries. The actors will almost certainly continue to rely on email to engage potential victims by exploiting novel vulnerabilities and, when necessary, use social engineering techniques to assist with their efforts. The authoring agencies recommend organizations regularly update their mail service software and continuously monitor their email systems and emails for malicious activity.</p>
<p>For a downloadable list of IOCs, see:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-07/AA26-204A.stix_.xml">AA26-204A.stix.xml</a> (STIX XML)</li>
<li><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-07/AA26-204A.stix_.json">AA26-204A.stix.json</a> (STIX JSON)</li>
</ul>
<h2><strong>Cybersecurity industry tracking</strong><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h2>
<p>The cybersecurity industry provides overlapping cyber threat intelligence, indicators of compromise (IOCs), and mitigation recommendations related to these Russian state-supported cyber actors. While not exhaustive, the following are threat group names commonly used for these actors within the cybersecurity community:</p>
<ul>
<li>LAUNDRY BEAR</li>
<li>Void Blizzard [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc2">2</a>]</li>
<li>CL-STA-1114 [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc3">3</a>]</li>
<li>TA488 (formerly UNK_PitStop) [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc4">4</a>]</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> Cybersecurity companies have different methods of tracking and attributing cyber actors, and this may not be a 1:1 correlation to the U.S. government’s understanding for all activity related to these groupings.</p>
<h2><strong>Background</strong></h2>
<p>Public advisories from Netherlands General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD), Netherlands Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD), and Microsoft highlighted these Russian state-supported advanced persistent threat (APT) actors in May 2025, calling them LAUNDRY BEAR and Void Blizzard respectively [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc1">1</a>] [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc2">2</a>]. Both advisories assessed that the group was engaged in malicious cyber activity as early as April 2024.  </p>
<p>The May 2025 advisories highlighted a cluster of activity targeting cloud-based email environments, including Microsoft Exchange in particular, and abusing legitimate APIs to perform data exfiltration in bulk [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1114/002/" target="_blank">T1114.002</a>]. The group relied on unsophisticated means of initial access, including procuring stolen credentials on criminal marketplaces [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1078/" target="_blank">T1078</a>], and using social engineering techniques to lure targets into interacting with a malicious site masquerading as a legitimate one. As of April 2025, one of these sites resembled a European Defence &amp; Security Summit registration portal that required registrants to sign in to their Microsoft account to view. Once a user entered their Microsoft credentials into this malicious site, LAUNDRY BEAR’s modified version of the open source adversary emulation toolkit, Evilginx, intercepted the user’s credentials. LAUNDRY BEAR then used this authentication data, including passwords and session tokens, to access the compromised account and conduct mass email exfiltration, as well as harvest other information. This method of compromise is commonly known as an adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) technique [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1557/" target="_blank">T1557</a>].  </p>
<p>Beginning around July 2025, LAUNDRY BEAR shifted toward a more technical method of email compromise, highlighting their continued efforts to covertly acquire email communications from a variety of Western organizations of interest and deliver them to the Russian Federation. Using a custom-developed capability [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/001/" target="_blank">T1587.001</a>] named “<em>Улей</em>” or “<em>Ulej</em>” (Russian for beehive), LAUNDRY BEAR successfully targeted and exfiltrated sensitive user information from organizations who use the Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) product [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1114/" target="_blank">T1114</a>]. Data LAUNDRY BEAR attempted to exfiltrate from compromised accounts included:</p>
<ul>
<li>Last 90 days of emails,</li>
<li>Email address,</li>
<li>Password [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1589/001/" target="_blank">T1589.001</a>],</li>
<li>Global Address List (GAL) [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1087/" target="_blank">T1087</a>],</li>
<li>Two-factor authentication (2FA) tokens, and</li>
<li>Newly-created Application Passcode [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1098/" target="_blank">T1098</a>].</li>
</ul>
<p>The covert and persistent nature of this activity, along with the absence of any known financial extortion, almost certainly indicates this group’s involvement in espionage activities with Russian government backing. Additionally, extensive Ukrainian targeting, prior to use against U.S. and other NATO allies, outlines an increasing trend within Russian cyber threat groups to target Ukrainian users first—both as a priority target and as a testbench for malicious cyber techniques before broader global deployment.</p>
<h2><strong>Targeting details</strong></h2>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR has targeted and compromised users in various organizations, including those associated with:</p>
<ul>
<li>the Defense Industrial Base (DIB),  </li>
<li>the federal and local government,</li>
<li>education,</li>
<li>energy,</li>
<li>law enforcement,  </li>
<li>media,  </li>
<li>non-governmental organizations, and</li>
<li>technology.</li>
</ul>
<h2><strong>Technical details</strong></h2>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> This advisory uses the <a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/matrices/enterprise/" target="_blank">MITRE ATT&amp;CK® Matrix for Enterprise</a> framework, version 19. This advisory also uses <a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/" target="_blank">MITRE D3FEND<sup>TM</sup></a> version 1.4.0<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f15"><sup>15</sup></a>. See <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#appendixa">Appendix A</a> and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#appendixb">Appendix B</a> for tables of the activity mapped to MITRE ATT&amp;CK and D3FEND tactics, techniques, and countermeasures.</p>
<p><em>Ulej </em>is a novel data exfiltration and aggregation capability, that currently (as of the publication of this report) supports a campaign specifically targeting users of ZCS webmail servers. This capability is used to exploit <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a> [Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html" target="_blank">CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting'</a>)], but likely could be adapted to exploit other vulnerabilities. It exfiltrates emails and other sensitive user data from a victim’s system immediately after exploitation and stores the data in an actor-controlled unattributable virtual private server (VPS) [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1074/002/" target="_blank">T1074.002</a>] running LAUNDRY BEAR’s “Flowerbed” collection framework. The collected data is almost certainly further exfiltrated to internal network resources for review and long-term retention.</p>
<h3><em><strong>Reconnaissance</strong></em></h3>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR uses the <em>Ulej </em>capability to exploit the <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a> vulnerability in organizations using ZCS. This campaign’s targeted victimology and limited exploitation capabilities likely indicate this group manually identifies and targets the victim organizations. LAUNDRY BEAR likely identifies organizations with public-facing Zimbra infrastructure by port scanning [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1595/" target="_blank">T1595</a>] and fingerprinting datasets easily procured through various commercial vendors [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1596/005/" target="_blank">T1596.005</a>].  </p>
<p>After identifying a target organization, the group likely compiles email addresses for individual users to target with the exploit [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1589/002/" target="_blank">T1589.002</a>] from datasets offered by commercial vendors [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1597/002/" target="_blank">T1597.002</a>], open source intelligence [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1593/" target="_blank">T1593</a>], or previously exfiltrated data [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1597/" target="_blank">T1597</a>].  </p>
<h3><em><strong>Resource development </strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<p>The actors procure VPSs from a variety of providers [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1583/003/" target="_blank">T1583.003</a>], including those with Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements, and often use fabricated identities. LAUNDRY BEAR primarily uses Mullvad VPN [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1583/">T1583</a>] when interacting with these servers, further demonstrating the group’s intent to mask their identity and maintain operations security (OPSEC). After the server is provisioned, an automated process deploys the Docker containers necessary for <em>Ulej’s</em> Flowerbed framework [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1608/">T1608</a>], which then receives and aggregates the data <em>Ulej</em> exfiltrates. These servers are typically only used for 7-60 days before moving to new infrastructure.</p>
<h4><strong>Flowerbed framework</strong></h4>
<p>Flowerbed is a Python project that uses Docker for containerization. The project includes four different Docker containers:</p>
<ul>
<li>Catcher,</li>
<li>Certbot,</li>
<li>Nginx, and</li>
<li>Gardener.</li>
</ul>
<p>Catcher acts as both a DNS and HTTP server to receive and aggregate exfiltrated victim information [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/">T1048</a>]. For additional information on Catcher, refer to the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#exfil1">Exfiltration</a> section of this advisory. Flowerbed’s next container, Certbot, is based on one of the official Certbot containers, which allows for automated generation of Let’s Encrypt certificates using DNS challenges through Cloudflare. This certificate can then be used by the Nginx container, which serves as an HTTPS reverse proxy for Catcher, enabling Flowerbed to disguise some of its exfiltration activity through an encrypted communications channel [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/002/" target="_blank">T1048.002</a>]. The Nginx reverse proxy also validates that the Server Name Indicator (SNI) value contains “*.i.*” prior to forwarding the traffic to Catcher. If the SNI does not contain that string, the Nginx server returns a 444 error to the client. This is likely an attempt to reject non-Ulej connections. Finally, the Gardener container functions as a health check for the Catcher service. Gardener is a simple Python script that validates Catcher correctly receives and processes data.</p>
<p>The simplistic Flowerbed codebase has indications that artificial intelligence (AI) played a role in its development. This highlights how AI is increasingly being used to develop malicious capabilities [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1588/007/" target="_blank">T1588.007</a>]. The dependence on AI for a simple capability, such as Flowerbed, alongside a previous reliance on open source capabilities, such as Evilginx2 [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1588/002/" target="_blank">T1588.002</a>], likely indicates a lack of advanced technical knowledge within LAUNDRY BEAR, especially in relation to true software development capabilities.</p>
<h3><em><strong>Initial access</strong></em></h3>
<p>To gain initial access, LAUNDRY BEAR sends an email containing a malicious JavaScript payload to the target [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1566/" target="_blank">T1566</a>]. Through exploitation of <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a>, this JavaScript payload is immediately executed once the user views the malicious email [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1203/" target="_blank">T1203</a>], such as the one shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure1"><strong>Figure 1</strong></a>, in the ZCS webmail platform. Since at least November 2025, LAUNDRY BEAR began sending these phishing emails from victim infrastructure through compromised accounts [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1199/" target="_blank">T1199</a>], as shown in the email metadata in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure2"><strong>Figure 2</strong></a>. These compromised accounts were likely previous victims of this, or another LAUNDRY BEAR, campaign and their use is intended to further obfuscate and frustrate anti-phishing tools and training.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/figure1.png?itok=yrzcl7tK" width="604" height="235" alt="Figure 1: Example of malicious email">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 1: Example of malicious email</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/figure2.png?itok=vEulmmyx" width="604" height="102" alt="Figure 2: Headers from an example malicious email">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 2: Headers from an example malicious email</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p>According to the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), <a href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a> was initially published on 5 January 2026. This vulnerability allows for execution of a JavaScript payload included in email content due to improper sanitization of Cascading Style Sheet’s (CSS) @import directives within an email [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc5">5</a>]. Because the activity attributed to this campaign began in July 2025—months before Synacor released a patch and the CVE was published—the payload initially exploited a zero-day vulnerability at that time [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/004/" target="_blank">T1587.004</a>].  </p>
<p><strong>Utilization of a zero-day exploit within this campaign demonstrates the ability for even emerging threat groups like LAUNDRY BEAR to operationalize novel exploits into a highly successful capability.</strong></p>
<p>Hidden in LAUNDRY BEAR’s email is a Base64 encoded payload within the “onload” field of a Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) element [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/017/" target="_blank">T1027.017</a>], as shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure3"><strong>Figure 3</strong></a>. Leading up to the inclusion of this payload in the SVG element are various instances of @import directives, as required to leverage <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376">CVE-2025-66376</a>. This payload includes an XOR encrypted final script encoded in a Base64 inner payload (see <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure3"><strong>Figure 3</strong></a>) [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/013/" target="_blank">T1027.013</a>]. The outer payload decodes and decrypts the inner payload using an XOR function and a hardcoded key and then executes the script contained within the inner payload containing the collection and exfiltration logic. By changing the key used for the XOR encryption of the inner payload or adding additional @import directives with non-functional code [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/010/" target="_blank">T1027.010</a>], LAUNDRY BEAR can easily generate new payloads that bypass basic threat detection signatures. This malicious payload attempts to collect and exfiltrate information in 12 asynchronous stages [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1119/">T1119</a>]. The stages in order of appearance within the payload are as follows:</p>
<ol>
<li>sendStartPing,</li>
<li>gather_email,</li>
<li>gather_environment,</li>
<li>gather_2fa_codes,</li>
<li>gather_app_password,</li>
<li>gather_device_status,</li>
<li>gather_oauth_consumers,</li>
<li>gather_autocomplete_password,</li>
<li>enable_mail_protocols,</li>
<li>gather_gal,</li>
<li>sendArchives, and</li>
<li>sendFinishPing. </li>
</ol>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/figure3_0.png?itok=M-bj5-nb" width="607" height="577" alt="Figure 3: Malicious payload of example email">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 3: Malicious payload of example email</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p>Use of a zero-day exploit within this campaign demonstrates the ability for even emerging threat groups like LAUNDRY BEAR to operationalize novel exploits into a highly successful capability [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/" target="_blank">T1587</a>].</p>
<h3><em><strong>Persistence and credential access</strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<p>To establish sustained persistence into the victim’s email account, the script attempts to modify account preferences and collect authentication information. Any collected credentials are later exfiltrated, as further described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#exfil1">Exfiltration</a> section below. Other campaigns attributed to LAUNDRY BEAR also demonstrated the group’s ability to circumvent multi-factor authentication through session token replay [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1550/004/" target="_blank">T1550.004</a>], and the Zimbra campaign follows a similar trend.</p>
<p>The script used in this campaign tries to discover the victim’s email address during the <em>gather_email</em> stage [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1087/" target="_blank">T1087</a>]. The script searches for this email address in two ways. First, it examines the <em>batchInfoResponse </em>variable, which an HTML script element on the webpage can define, for an email address. Even if the script finds an email address there, it also checks whether it acquired a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) token as described later in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#collection1">Collection</a> section of this advisory. If so, the script uses the “GetIdentitiesRequest” Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) command under the “ZimbraAccount” namespace to determine the victim’s email address [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1185/" target="_blank">T1185</a>] and then exfiltrates it. However, if the script does not have a CSRF token or the SOAP request fails, the script exfiltrates the email value recovered from the first method instead. If both attempts fail to capture the victim’s email, the script sends a JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) payload with a key of “email” and value of <em>null </em>over HTTPS and does not attempt DNS exfiltration.</p>
<p>During the <em>gather_autocomplete_password</em> stage, the script attempts to collect the victim’s saved password via the autocomplete feature of the victim’s password manager. The script injects two HTML div elements requesting login credentials onto the page outside of the victim’s view, as shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure4"><strong>Figure 4</strong></a><strong> </strong>and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure5"><strong>Figure 5</strong></a>. After waiting five seconds, the script then attempts to extract the password provided automatically by the password manager from the input element shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure4"><strong>Figure 4</strong></a>. If there is no value in that input field, it checks the password input field shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure5"><strong>Figure 5</strong></a>. If neither input field contains a value, a JSON payload with a key of “autocomplete_password” and value of <em>null </em>is sent over HTTPS and DNS exfiltration is not attempted.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/figure4.png?itok=ZOZ8JHZC" width="1024" height="188" alt="Figure 4: First illegitimate login HTML element">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 4: First illegitimate login HTML element</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/figure5.png?itok=8xZU_GCa" width="1024" height="115" alt="Figure 5: Second illegitimate login HTML element">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 5: Second illegitimate login HTML element</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR almost certainly relies on a mail client using the Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) for persistent access to the victim’s mailbox. During the <em>enable_mail_protocols</em> stage, a SOAP request leveraging the “ModifyPrefsRequest” command under the “ZimbraAccount” namespace is sent. This request attempts to set the “zimbraPrefImapEnabled” preference to TRUE. While the default setting for “zimbraPrefImapEnabled” is not well documented, this action is almost certainly intended to ensure that IMAP access to the victim’s mailbox is enabled.</p>
<p>ZCS does not support 2FA for some mail clients, including IMAP. To support users who rely on IMAP clients, ZCS allows for the generation of Application Passcodes. Application Passcodes are randomly generated passwords that can be used for clients that cannot support the normal 2FA process to authenticate. During the <em>gather_app_password</em> stage, the script makes a SOAP request using the “CreateAppSpecificPasswordRequest” command under the “ZimbraAccount” namespace to create a new Application Passcode [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1556/006/" target="_blank">T1556.006</a>]. The SOAP request uses “ZimbraWeb” as the name of the application.</p>
<p>Additionally, the script also attempts to collect 2FA tokens. During the <em>gather_2fa_codes</em> stage, the script makes a SOAP request using the “GetScratchCodesRequest” command under the “ZimbraAccount” namespace. The script then attempts to exfiltrate any non-null 2FA codes collected this way. The number of codes can vary, and each code is exfiltrated to Flowerbed individually.</p>
<h3><em><strong>Collection</strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<p>As demonstrated in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#persistence1">Persistence and credential access</a> section, this script relies heavily on SOAP requests to collect victim information. To make these requests, the script aims to acquire the victim’s current CSRF token, which it attempts to access within the webpage’s local storage using localStorage.getItem("csrfToken"). If the script is unable to acquire this CSRF token, it will be unable to make any SOAP requests. In addition to the SOAP commands documented in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#persistence1">Persistence and credential access</a> section, other SOAP commands executed to collect victim information are shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table1"><strong>Table 1</strong></a>.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 1: Additional SOAP commands used</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p><strong>SOAP Command </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p><strong>Namespace </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p><strong>Stage </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>GetInfoRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>zimbraAccount </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>GetDeviceStatusRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>zimbraSync </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>gather_device_status </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>GetOAuthConsumersRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>zimbraAccount </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>gather_oauth_consumers </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>SearchGalRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>zimbraAccount </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>gather_gal </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The script attempts to collect the victim’s GAL through brute force by searching for each two-character combination from a character set of “abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz1234567890.-_”. These queries are conducted using 20 batches of SOAP requests with 77 “SearchGalRequest” SOAP commands in each batch except for the last request containing only 58.</p>
<p>During the <em>gather_environment</em> stage, the script attempts to determine which type of ZCS webmail client the victim is using. The script checks the user’s current URL to determine the client type being used, checking for certain indicators (shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table2"><strong>Table 2</strong></a>) to determine the client type. The corresponding value is then used as the payload when exfiltrating the client type.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 2: ZCS webmail client types</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p><strong>Indicator </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p><strong>Client Type </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p><strong>Associated Value </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>?client=advanced </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>Advanced </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>c </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>/h/ </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>Standard </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>h </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>/modern/ </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>Modern </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>m </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As part of collection, the script attempts to harvest any emails not marked as “junk” from the last 90 days from the victim’s account. Emails are collected daily by an HTTP GET request to the URL path, “/home/~/?fmt=tgz&amp;meta=0&amp;query=date:-{DAY_OFFSET}d AND (not in:junk)”. The <em>{DAY_OFFSET}</em> value would be between 0 and 89 representing how many days ago the email was sent or received. To prevent redundant collection and exfiltration of emails, a variable with a name based on the email date being queried, using a format of <em>zd_comp_YYYY-MM-DD</em>, and value of <em>true</em>, is saved to the <em>window.top.localStorage</em> property. This variable is saved regardless of whether the email is successfully exfiltrated.  </p>
<p>According to Mozilla documentation, if the user is not in a private browsing session, any data stored to localStorage does not typically expire. This means that if the user happens to execute the script again from the same computer, the script avoids attempting to re-exfiltrate previously captured emails. However, the script always attempts to pull any emails with a <em>{DAY_OFFSET} </em>of zero. In other words, the script always pulls emails sent or received the same day it is run. After email results are returned from the query for each day of email activity, those results are then passed to Flowerbed as described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#exfil1">Exfiltration</a> section.</p>
<p>The script also provides LAUNDRY BEAR with telemetry on any errors that occur during the collection process. This is accomplished by executing any collection or exfiltration code through helper functions that contain error handling logic. If an error occurs, a payload containing information on the error itself, the context of the error happening, and the stage in which the error occurred is sent to Flowerbed as described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#exfil1">Exfiltration</a> section below. For cases where the error occurs within a SOAP request, “:api” is concatenated to the stage value in the payload. If an error occurs during the batch SOAP requests that occur when collecting the GAL of the victim, the stage value will use a format of <em>gather_gal:{VAL}:api</em>. The <em>{VAL}</em> placeholder indicates which batch request, a number from 0 to 19, the error occurred in. Errors that occur during the password autocomplete interception process will use “gather_autocomplete_password:dom” for the stage value. Finally, if an error occurs when attempting to collect or exfiltrate a specific day’s emails, the stage will include which day the error occurred on, using the previously defined placeholder <em>{DAY_OFFSET},</em> with a format of <em>sendArchive:day-{DAY_OFFSET}</em>.</p>
<h3><em><strong>Exfiltration</strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<p>At the end of each stage in the collection process, the script attempts to exfiltrate acquired information to Flowerbed. The script primarily relies on two forms of data exfiltration: DNS [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/003/" target="_blank">T1048.003</a>] and HTTPS. Some information is exfiltrated over both the DNS and HTTPS channels.</p>
<p>Prior to exfiltration, a randomized 10- or 11-character alphanumeric string is generated as an identifier for the victim. This identifier is included in the URL of both the DNS- and HTTPS-based exfiltration.  </p>
<h4><strong>DNS exfiltration</strong></h4>
<p>DNS exfiltration occurs through DNS A record queries. To ensure data exfiltrated through DNS is not corrupted when traversing through non-actor-controlled DNS infrastructure, <em>Ulej </em>maintains compliance with RFC 1035, Domain Names - Implementation and Specification, specifically accounting for the case insensitivity and subdomain length requirements. Base32 encoding is used to create a case-insensitive payload. Once the payload is encoded, a period (“.”) is added every 60 characters to ensure each subdomain is under 63 characters long. The script then creates a new image object sourced from a URL with the scheme defined in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure6"><strong>Figure 6</strong></a>. Any traffic involving DNS exfiltration will have “d-“ prefixing the victim identifier, and the subdomain immediately following indicates the type of information being exfiltrated.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/Figure6.png?itok=Tv8RT8o8" width="1024" height="49" alt="Figure 6: Structure for information exfiltrated by DNS">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 6: Structure for information exfiltrated by DNS</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p>When the script generates an image object, the browser tries to retrieve the complete domain of the URL specified as the source of the image. This triggers a DNS request sent to the actor-controlled server and processed by Flowerbed. <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table3"><strong>Table 3</strong></a> lists both the information exfiltrated via DNS and their corresponding data type identifiers in the DNS queries.  </p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 3: DNS exfiltration</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p><strong>Type of Information </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p><strong>Exfiltration Stage </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p><strong>Data Type </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>Victim’s Email Address </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_email </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>e </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>Client Type </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>c </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>Zimbra Version </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment  </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>v </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>URL at Time of Exploitation </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>url </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>2FA Scratch Codes </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_2fa_codes </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>2fa </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>Newly Created Application Password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_app_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>pa </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>Harvested Autocomplete Password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_autocomplete_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>pw </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4><strong>HTTPS exfiltration</strong></h4>
<p>Any information exfiltrated via DNS is also exfiltrated through HTTPS, as well as additional data including email content, contacts, attachments, and error logging information. By using Let’s Encrypt certificates, this group can quickly deploy new infrastructure and leverage encrypted HTTPS communications with valid server certificates when exfiltrating information from the victim’s environment. The HTTPS exfiltration capability only uses two HTTP content types, defined in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table4"><strong>Table 4</strong></a>. Traffic associated with HTTPS exfiltration will use the URL scheme shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure7"><strong>Figure 7</strong></a>.  </p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 4: HTTPS exfiltration types</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p><strong>Content Type </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p><strong>URL Path </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p>application/json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p>/v/p </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p>application/octet-stream </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p>/v/d </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/Figure%207.png?itok=CdTcyMdN" width="1024" height="50" alt="Figure 7: Structure for information exfiltrated by HTTPS">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 7: Structure for information exfiltrated by HTTPS</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p>Some of the data transmitted via HTTPS uses the standard JSON content type format. The script includes the information in a POST request to actor-controlled infrastructure.  </p>
<p><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table5"><strong>Table 5</strong></a> provides a summary of the JSON-based exfiltration.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 5: HTTPS JSON exfiltration  </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p><strong>Type of Information </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p><strong>Exfiltration Stage </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p><strong>JSON Key(s) </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>Victim’s Email Address </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>gather_email </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>email </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>Client Type, Version, and Current URL </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>client, version, full_url </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>Newly Created Application Password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>gather_app_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>app_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>Harvested Autocomplete Password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>gather_autocomplete_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>autocomplete_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The script transmits all HTTPS exfiltration not identified in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table5"><strong>Table 5</strong></a> using the Octet-Stream content type as binary data. The POST requests for this method include a filename in the “X-Filename” header. Traditionally, developers use headers prefixed with “X-” to denote custom headers that do not follow a defined standard. The purpose of including this header remains unclear since the Catcher capability ignores the provided filename when saving the data. <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table6"><strong>Table 6</strong></a> summarizes the data exfiltrated in this format.</p>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="WACAltTextDescribedBy SCXW189907655 BCX8"><a class="ck-anchor"></a></div>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong> Table 6: HTTPS binary exfiltration</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p><strong>Type of Information </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p><strong>Exfiltration Stage </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p><strong>X-Filename Header </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>SOAP request for GetInfoRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>zimbra_batch_analytics.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>SOAP request for GetScratchCodesRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>gather_2fa_codes </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>zimbra_batch_analytics.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>SOAP request for GetDeviceStatusRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>gather_device_status </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>zimbra_batch_analytics.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>SOAP request for GetOAuthConsumersRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>gather_oauth_consumers </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>zimbra_batch_analytics.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>Victim Organization’s Global Address List </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>gather_gal </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>telemetry_{1-20}.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>Last 90 Days of Victim’s Emails </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>sendArchives </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>telemetryData_{0-89}.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<p>The script sends all exfiltrated data identified in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table6"><strong>Table 6</strong></a> to the Catcher service exactly as received from the SOAP request in a JSON payload, except for email exfiltration. For email exfiltration, the script sends it as a GZIP compressed archive [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1560/" target="_blank">T1560</a>]. Although most of the exfiltration consists of valid JSON, the script still attempts to exfiltrate all information identified in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table6"><strong>Table 6</strong></a> using the application/octet-stream content typing rather than application/json.</p>
<p>At the beginning and end of the collection and exfiltration activity, during the <em>sendStartPing</em> and <em>sendFinishPing </em>stages respectively, the script submits a POST request with a JSON payload to indicate that the script is starting or finishing execution. Throughout execution, the script also logs error events and send the logs using similar JSON payloads. The script sends the JSON in a POST request to the URL documented in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure2"><strong>Figure 2</strong></a>, using a URL path of “/v/p” and with a “subtype” key that shows which type of action it logged (<em>start, finish, or error</em>).  </p>
<h4><strong>Catcher</strong></h4>
<p><em>Ulej </em>exfiltrates information to Flowerbed to be handled by a service named Catcher. Catcher is a containerized Python application, running in Docker as part of Flowerbed, which is detailed in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#resourcedev1">Resource development</a> section. It receives exfiltrated data and temporarily stores it, enabling its eventual transfer to infrastructure designed for long-term, secure storage.</p>
<p>Catcher acts as an HTTP server over port 8000 and a DNS server on port 53. As described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#resourcedev1">Resource development</a> section, the Flowerbed project uses an additional Docker container running an Nginx reverse proxy to enable HTTPS support. This reverse proxy uses a certificate generated by Let’s Encrypt and forwards all traffic with an SNI containing “*.i.*” to port 8000 within the Catcher container.</p>
<p>The DNS service can accept A, AAAA, MX, TXT, and CAA queries. For any MX, AAAA, or CAA queries, the server will always provide an empty response. The system only supports TXT records as needed to process Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME) requests, which enable the assignment of Let’s Encrypt certificates. If the server receives an A query, Catcher will always respond with the public IP address of the Flowerbed server.  </p>
<p>However, if a query includes a domain formatted as shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure6"><strong>Figure 6</strong></a> and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure7"><strong>Figure 7</strong></a>, the service saves a log file in JSON format to disk containing the following details of the DNS query:</p>
<ul>
<li>Time of query,</li>
<li>Source IP address for query,</li>
<li>Queried domain, and</li>
<li>Type of query.</li>
</ul>
<p>The HTTP server typically responds with OK, except in cases where the path is “pixel.gif” when the response contains a 1x1 gif image with a SHA-256 hash of ef1955ae757c8b966c83248350331bd3a30f658ced11f387f8ebf05ab3368629. Like the DNS service, the HTTP service will only log entries when the domain found in the host header of the request follows the expected formatting as seen in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure6"><strong>Figure 6</strong></a> and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure7"><strong>Figure 7</strong></a>. As the HTTPS exfiltration uses non-standardized binary and JSON-formatted payloads when exfiltrating to Catcher, Catcher will check the content type of the request. If the content type is set to “application/json”, Catcher encodes the data in Base64 and includes it in the JSON log entry written to disk. If the content type is set to any other value, Catcher leaves the Base64 payload in the JSON log entry blank and saves the payload to a separate file with the same filename as the JSON log entry with a “.bin” file extension. An HTTPS exfiltration event causes Catcher to save a JSON formatted log file to disk containing the following information from the HTTP request:</p>
<ul>
<li>Time,</li>
<li>Source IP address,</li>
<li>Request method,</li>
<li>Host,</li>
<li>Path,</li>
<li>Query string,</li>
<li>Headers, and</li>
<li>Base64 payload.</li>
</ul>
<p>These JSON event log files and binary output files are then initially saved to the directory <em>/root/hits/tmp</em> and later moved to the <em>/root/hits/ready</em> directory once processed. This prevents incomplete files, which are still being uploaded to Catcher, from premature exfiltration from the server. Approximately every 60 seconds, a likely automated workflow establishes a Secure Shell (SSH) connection with the server hosting Flowerbed for a few seconds, almost certainly exfiltrating the data processed by Catcher to non-public-facing infrastructure. The command in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure8"><strong>Figure 8</strong></a> also executes hourly to remove all files last modified at least two days ago from the <em>/root/hits/ready</em> directory.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/Figure%208-Command%20used%20for%20automated%20directory%20cleanup.png?itok=IqvZvbLK" width="1024" height="92" alt="Figure 8: Command used for automated directory cleanup">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 8: Command used for automated directory cleanup</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<h2><strong>Response strategies</strong></h2>
<h3><em><strong>Mitigations</strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<p>In many cases, by the time an organization identifies a compromise related to this campaign, numerous sensitive and proprietary emails have already been exfiltrated. The significant risk posed by this cyber threat emphasizes the importance for organizations that use ZCS and other similar webmail solutions to take proactive steps to mitigate this risk.</p>
<p>All organizations that use the ZCS webmail service should <strong>immediately prioritize</strong> ensuring that their ZCS is not running a vulnerable version. A patch for <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a> was released for both 10.1.13 and 10.0.18 versions of ZCS [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ApplicationHardening">D3-AH</a>]. If immediate patching is not feasible, organizations should advise employees to use alternative mail clients to access email and avoid using the Classic ZCS webmail client until ZCS is updated to a non-vulnerable version [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/tactic/d3f:Isolate/" target="_blank">d3f:Isolate</a>].</p>
<p>System administrators should closely monitor any Internet-connected ZCS or other email systems and the workstations that access those systems and promptly apply available software updates [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ApplicationHardening" target="_blank">D3-AH</a>]. Administrators can maintain awareness of active vulnerability exploitation by referencing open source resources, including <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog">CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog</a> and <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/vulnerability-management/guidance/responding-to-active-exploitation" target="_blank">NCSC-UK’s Responding to active exploitation of vulnerabilities</a> guidance.</p>
<p>Organizations should consider using a third-party authentication service that supports passkeys for authentication to mediate access to ZCS and other services that do not natively support passkeys. By doing so, organizations can work to eliminate the possibility of automated password collection from autocomplete or password reuse [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:CredentialHardening" target="_blank">D3-CH</a>]. However, Application Passcodes may still be necessary and should be monitored closely.  </p>
<p>Organizations should implement network monitoring capabilities with collection and short-term retention of packet capture or NetFlow data and maintain log collection and storage [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#MaintainLogCollectionStorage3Q">CPG 3.Q</a>]. This will allow organizations to monitor for and identify suspicious network activity [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#IdentifyAdverseEvents4B">CPG 4.B</a>], such as:</p>
<ul>
<li>Significant amounts of outbound data being sent to IPs associated with VPS providers not used by the organization [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-NTA</a>];</li>
<li>Frequent DNS queries for a suspicious domain with seemingly random subdomains [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:DNSTrafficAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-DNSTA</a>];</li>
<li>A sudden spike of connections to a server associated with a recently established domain [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficCommunityDeviation">D3-NTCD</a>]; and  </li>
<li>Connections to internal services, such as webmail, from VPN providers frequently leveraged by this group for nefarious activity, such as Mullvad VPN [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficCommunityDeviation">D3-NTCD</a>].</li>
</ul>
<p>Additionally, for organizations that can inspect the content of outbound HTTPS connections via break-and-inspect infrastructure, security teams should identify traffic matching the characteristics described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#exfil1">Exfiltration</a> section of this advisory.</p>
<h3><em><strong>Indicators of compromise (IOCs)</strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<h4><strong>Flowerbed infrastructure</strong></h4>
<p>The following indicators have been attributed to use by LAUNDRY BEAR for their campaign targeting ZCS’s webmail service as of the publication of this advisory. (<strong>Disclaimer: </strong>Due to the frequency of operational structure changes by this group, these indicators are intended solely for historic attribution purposes. Some indicators, such as IPs, compromised emails, and domains, may be outdated, so organizations should check for current activity before acting on these IOCs.) <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table7"><strong>Table 7</strong></a> provides details about the server infrastructure used to host Flowerbed, and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table8"><strong>Table 8</strong></a> lists the corresponding SHA-1 hash values for the Let’s Encrypt certificates used by that infrastructure [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:IdentifierActivityAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-IAA</a>].</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 7: Flowerbed server infrastructure</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p><strong>Domain </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p><strong>IP Address </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p><strong>First Seen </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p><strong>Last Seen </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>zmailanalytics[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>216.252.238[.]104 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>8 July 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>15 October 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>zimbra-metadata[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>216.252.238[.]18 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>20 August 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>14 October 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>analyticemailmeter[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>37.120.247[.]228 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>24 September 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>18 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>emailanalytics.com[.]ua </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>185.86.79[.]95 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>24 September 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>18 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>mailnalysis[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>104.248.134[.]194 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>11 November 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>17 February 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>zimbrastat[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>64.226.124[.]190 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>18 December 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>18 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>zimbrasoft.com[.]ua </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>193.238.152[.]66 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>20 January 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>18 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>synacorzimbra[.]nl </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>216.252.238[.]64 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>3 February 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>30 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>istc-cloud[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>194.156.103[.]193 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>5 February 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>30 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 8: Flowerbed X.509 certificate SHA-1 hashes  </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p><strong>Associated Domain </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p><strong>X.509 SHA-1 Hash </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p><strong>First Seen </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p><strong>Last Seen </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>zmailanalytics[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>2e4f314bc9943cab5005d6fde0b271c74d47bc9d </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>8 Jul 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>6 Aug 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.zmailanalytics[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>50a87d926621dd06389ba50d86e0ff574ed713a8 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>6 Aug 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>13 Oct 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.zimbra-metadata[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>c5a72420e7bb308d078e62128430897f82194c95 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>20 Aug 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>14 Oct 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.analyticemailmeter[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>8959c4d29e29f02ea94ea8bb21c8df2594c5549d </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>24 Sep 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>8 Nov 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.emailanalytics.com[.]ua </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>62eb76432597694edb01c1fe57aab0cfe03a7178 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>25 Sep 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>27 Sep 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.mailnalysis[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>cddf5c3be1e07f28140aed165b929bf2d614922a </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>12 Nov 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>17 Dec 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.zimbrastat[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>18b3ad442ce73cc8656d51d75bbd7c855f2cb7e8 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>18 Dec 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>28 Dec 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.zimbrasoft.com[.]ua </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>1b25041ececf2457eef0270fc1d785cec8ec9ded </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>21 Jan 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>10 Feb 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.synacorzimbra[.]nl </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>e4fe6466a4f9a4249fe330651e914e45bbdca44a </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>5 Feb 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>22 Mar 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.istc-cloud[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>b6b77c9a455225d525834a403ca9ef5481ed0447 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>12 Feb 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>30 Mar 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR has used the following email addresses to procure resources used for this campaign:</p>
<ul>
<li>ivanka.zurabishvili@proton[.]me,</li>
<li>zmul1@buildandconsulting[.]com,</li>
<li>garrysmithme@pinmx[.]net, and</li>
<li>hostingclient@pinmx[.]net.</li>
</ul>
<h4><strong>Phishing distribution</strong></h4>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR primarily relied on ProtonMail for distribution of malicious email. However, as stated above, LAUNDRY BEAR’s more recent efforts likely have shifted to distributing the payload through previous victims.  </p>
<p>The following email addresses have distributed payloads attributed to this campaign:</p>
<ul>
<li>c.laurent.ejfa@proton[.]me,</li>
<li>j.moreau.epsc@proton[.]me,</li>
<li>liberty.insights@proton[.]me,</li>
<li>certain email addresses (presumably compromised) at the isofts.kiev[.]ua domain (i.e., ending with @isofts.kiev[.]ua), and</li>
<li>certain email addresses (presumably compromised) at the navs.edu[.]ua domain (i.e., ending with @navs.edu[.]ua).</li>
</ul>
<p>Additionally, the following are SHA-256 hashes of email samples containing the malicious payload attributed to this campaign:</p>
<ul>
<li>98df604ecc57f884a2e6ce3266a0013ad64455cac48442c2312cfa4765007aaf,</li>
<li>60db9abae75cd8ccc49dd7ea5feb41677566dcd442f12ebc5745ffd2810fb874,</li>
<li>b1f5beb1175fc5c7d1806a2f0d900eb124c54f0286c5c52b66eea7a6633adb1d, and</li>
<li>1517b3caa495f6c4e832df9c75fc94667e3c233773f7fa4e056d5e30e5ead760.</li>
</ul>
<h4><strong>Post-compromise artifacts</strong></h4>
<p>Currently, the script does not remove artifacts. This leaves additional opportunities to identify victims of this activity. While emphasis should always be placed on consistent monitoring of network traffic and endpoint activity, there are a variety of persistent artifacts described below that can be used to identify victims of this campaign.</p>
<p>This <em>Ulej </em>capability relies on creating a significant number of SOAP requests to collect account information for exfiltration. ZCS logs from these requests are stored, by default, in the <em>/opt/zimbra/log/mailbox.log</em> file [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ProcessAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-PA</a>]. A significant amount of SOAP request activity that aligns with what was described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#persistence1">Persistence and credential access</a> and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#collection1">Collection</a> sections of this advisory could indicate a potential compromise. Specific examples of high-risk SOAP request activity might include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Many <em>SearchGalRequest </em>command requests from a single user over a short period of time;</li>
<li>Use of the <em>CreateAppSpecificPasswordRequest</em> command, especially in cases where it is creating an Application Passcode named “ZimbraWeb”; and</li>
<li>Use of the GetScratchCodesRequest command.</li>
</ul>
<p>While LAUNDRY BEAR uses the localStorage property to track what days had emails previously exfiltrated, defenders can use this property to identify victims of this campaign and determine the scope of exfiltrated information [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ProcessAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-PA</a>]. Review of the items stored in that property for an organization’s ZCS webmail client page on an endpoint device could indicate compromise if there are items named with a format of <em>zd_comp_YYYY-MM-DD,</em> as explained in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#collection1">Collection</a> section of this advisory.</p>
<p>While Application Passcodes have non-malicious purposes, in this case instances of these passcodes with the name “ZimbraWeb” are almost certainly malicious. The ZCS webmail application can support 2FA natively and does not require the use of an Application Passcode, so there is no reason that there should be one named “ZimbraWeb.”</p>
<p>In instances where organizations identify victims of this campaign, they should also examine the inbox of the suspected victim for the original phishing email [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:MessageAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-MA</a>]. If an email that has a payload exploiting <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376">CVE-2025-66376</a> is discovered, <strong>steps should be taken immediately to identify and quarantine other instances of emails with similar body content, senders, and subject lines to prevent further exploitation and exfiltration.  </strong></p>
<h3><em><strong>Remediation</strong></em></h3>
<p>In the event an organization identifies activity associated with this campaign, that organization should take steps to minimize further exploitation. The organization should consider requesting that employees minimize use of the ZCS webmail client until the organization updates to a patched version that is not vulnerable to <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a>.</p>
<p>Organizations should use identifiers from the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#ioc1">IOCs</a> section of this report to identify any individuals compromised by this campaign and record the date(s) of compromise(s) to determine the scale and scope of emails exfiltrated.</p>
<p>All users from the organization should have all Application Passcodes and 2FA scratch keys revoked. Affected organizations should require all employees to change passwords in line with establishing minimum password strength requirements [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#EstablishMinimumPasswordStrength3B">CPG 3.B</a>] and creating unique credentials [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#CreateUniqueCredentials3C">CPG 3.C</a>], specifically noting that compromised employees might have had any password stored in a password manager exfiltrated.</p>
<h2><strong>Works cited</strong></h2>
<p>[1<a class="ck-anchor"></a>] Netherlands General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD) and Netherlands Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD). AIVD and MIVD identify a new Russian cyber threat actor. 2025. <a href="https://www.aivd.nl/site/binaries/site-content/collections/documents/2025/05/27/aivd-en-mivd-onderkennen-nieuwe-russische-cyberactor/Advisory+AIVD+en+MIVD+Public+report+on+new+cyber+actor.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.aivd.nl/site/binaries/site-content/collections/documents/2025/05/27/aivd-en-mivd-onderkennen-nieuwe-russische-cyberactor/Advisory+AIVD+en+MIVD+Public+report+on+new+cyber+actor.pdf</a></p>
<p>[2]<a class="ck-anchor"></a> Microsoft Corporation. New Russia-affiliated actor Void Blizzard targets critical sectors for espionage. 2025. <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2025/05/27/new-russia-affiliated-actor-void-blizzard-targets-critical-sectors-for-espionage/" target="_blank">https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2025/05/27/new-russia-affiliated-actor-void-blizzard-targets-critical-sectors-for-espionage/</a></p>
<p>[3]<a class="ck-anchor"></a> Palo Alto Networks Unit 42. Russian Global Webmail Espionage. 2026. <a href="https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/russian-webmail-espionage/">https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/russian-webmail-espionage/ </a></p>
<p>[4]<a class="ck-anchor"></a> Proofpoint. TA488 Targets Zimbra Mailservers with Half-Click Exploits. 2026. <a href="https://www.proofpoint.com/us/blog/threat-insight/ta488-zcs-exploit">https://www.proofpoint.com/us/blog/threat-insight/ta488-zcs-exploit</a></p>
<p>[5]<a class="ck-anchor"></a> Seqrite. Operation GhostMail: Russian APT exploits Zimbra Webmail to Target Ukraine State Agency. 2026. <a href="https://www.seqrite.com/blog/operation-ghostmail-zimbra-xss-russian-apt-ukraine/" target="_blank">https://www.seqrite.com/blog/operation-ghostmail-zimbra-xss-russian-apt-ukraine/  </a></p>
<h2><strong>Footnotes</strong></h2>
<p><sup>1</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Národní úřad pro kybernetickou a informační bezpečnost<br><sup>2</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup> </sup>Forsvarets Efterretningstjeneste<br><sup>3</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup> </sup>Välisluureamet<br><sup>4</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Sotilastiedustelu<br><sup>5</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup> </sup> Suojelupoliisi<br><sup>6</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Direction générale de la sécurité intérieure<br><sup>7</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d’information<br><sup>8</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Agenzia Informazioni e Sicurezza Esterna<br><sup>9</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Agenzia Informazioni e Sicurezza Interna<br><sup>10</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Serviciul de Informații și Securitate al Republicii Moldova<br><sup>11 </sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a>Agencja Wywiadu<br><sup>12</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup> </sup>Służba Kontrwywiadu Wojskowego<br><sup>13</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup> </sup>Centro Nacional de Inteligencia<br><sup>14 </sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a>Nationellt Cybersäkerhetscenter<br><sup>15</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> MITRE and ATT&amp;CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE D3FEND is a trademark of The MITRE Corporation.</p>
<h2><strong>Acknowledgements</strong></h2>
<p>The authoring agencies acknowledge the contributions to this advisory from Palo Alto Networks Unit 42 and Proofpoint.</p>
<h2><strong>Disclaimer of endorsement</strong></h2>
<p>The information and opinions contained in this document are provided "as is" and without any warranties or guarantees. Reference herein to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government, and this guidance shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.</p>
<p>Organizations have no obligation to respond or provide information back to the authoring organizations in response to this joint advisory. If, after reviewing the information provided, an organization decides to provide information to the authoring organizations, reporting must be consistent with all applicable laws and policies.</p>
<h2><strong>Purpose</strong></h2>
<p>This document was developed in furtherance of the authoring agencies’ cybersecurity missions, including their responsibilities to identify and disseminate threats, and to develop and issue cybersecurity specifications and mitigations. This information may be shared broadly to reach all appropriate stakeholders.</p>
<h2><strong>Contact</strong></h2>
<div class="SCXW95230887 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW95230887 BCX8">
<p><strong>United States organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>National Security Agency</strong> <br>Cybersecurity Report Feedback: <a href="mailto:CybersecurityReports@nsa.gov" target="_blank"><u>CybersecurityReports@nsa.gov</u></a> <br>Defense Industrial Base Inquiries and Cybersecurity Services: <a href="mailto:DIB_Defense@cyber.nsa.gov" target="_blank"><u>DIB_Defense@cyber.nsa.gov</u></a> <br>Media Inquiries / Press Desk: NSA Media Relations: 443-634-0721, <a href="mailto:MediaRelations@nsa.gov" target="_blank"><u>MediaRelations@nsa.gov</u></a> </li>
<li><strong>Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency</strong> <br>CISA’s 24/7 Operations Center (<a href="mailto:contact@cisa.dhs.gov" target="_blank"><u>contact@cisa.dhs.gov</u></a>), or by calling 1-844-Say-CISA (1-844-729-2472). </li>
<li><strong>Federal Bureau of Investigation</strong> <br>If you or someone you know has fallen victim to this campaign, file a complaint with <a class="Hyperlink SCXW95230887 BCX8" href="https://www.ic3.gov/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><u>IC3</u></a>. </li>
<li><strong>Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency </strong> <br>DCSA Counterintelligence, Cyber Mission Center, Cyber Threat Operations Branch: <a href="mailto:DCSA.CI.CyberOps@mail.mil" target="_blank"><u>DCSA.CI.CyberOps@mail.mil</u></a> <br>Cleared Contactors (CCs) should contact their DCSA Counterintelligence Special Agent to report information pertaining to suspicious contacts or physical/digital efforts to obtain illegal or unauthorized access to the CC’s cleared facility/information, as required by 32 CFR 117. <br>Media/Public Inquiries: <a href="mailto:dcsa.quantico.dcsa-hq.mbx.pa@mail.mil" target="_blank"><u>dcsa.quantico.dcsa-hq.mbx.pa@mail.mil</u></a>  </li>
<li><strong>Department of Defense Cyber Crime Center </strong> <br>Defense Industrial Base Inquiries and Cybersecurity Services: <a href="mailto:DC3.DCISE@us.af.mil" target="_blank"><u>DC3.DCISE@us.af.mil</u></a> <br>Defense Industrial Base mandatory cyber incident reporting as required by 10 U.S. Code Sections 391 and 393 and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 252.204-7012 is submitted at <a href="https://dibnet.dod.mil/" target="_blank"><u>https://dibnet.dod.mil</u></a> <br>Media Inquiries / Press Desk: <a href="mailto:DC3.Information@us.af.mil" target="_blank"><u>DC3.Information@us.af.mil</u></a> </li>
<li><strong>Naval Criminal Investigative Service</strong> <br>To report criminal activity impacting the United States Navy, go to <a href="http://www.ncis.navy.mil/" target="_blank"><u>www.ncis.navy.mil</u></a> and click “Submit a Tip”</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Dutch organizations</strong> </p>
<ul>
<li>Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD): <a href="https://www.defensie.nl/onderwerpen/m/militaire-inlichtingen-en-veiligheid" target="_blank"><u>https://www.defensie.nl/onderwerpen/m/militaire-inlichtingen-en-veiligheid</u></a>  </li>
<li>General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD): <a href="https://www.aivd.nl/" target="_blank"><u>https://www.aivd.nl</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Australian organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Australian Signals Directorate <br>Visit <a href="https://www.cyber.gov.au/about-us/about-asd-acsc/contact-us#no-back" target="_blank"><u>cyber.gov.au</u></a> or call 1300 292 371 (1300 CYBER 1) to report cybersecurity incidents and access alerts and advisories. </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Canadian organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (Cyber Centre), part of the Communications Security Establishment, encourages Canadian organizations to report cyber incidents and to strengthen the security of their networking devices.  <br>Report an incident or suspicious activity to the Cyber Centre by email at <a href="mailto:contact@cyber.gc.ca" target="_blank"><u>contact@cyber.gc.ca</u></a>, online via the reporting tool <a href="https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/incident-management" target="_blank"><u>Report a cyber incident - Canadian Centre for Cyber Security</u></a> or by phone at 1-833-CYBER-88 (1-833-292-3788). </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>New Zealand organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>New Zealand National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-NZ): <a href="mailto:info@ncsc.govt.nz" target="_blank"><u>info@ncsc.govt.nz</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>United Kingdom organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Report significant cyber security incidents to <a href="https://ncsc.gov.uk/report-an-incident" target="_blank"><u>ncsc.gov.uk/report-an-incident</u></a> (monitored 24/7) </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Estonia organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service (EFIS): <a href="mailto:info@valisluureamet.ee" target="_blank"><u>info@valisluureamet.ee</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Finnish organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Finnish Security and Intelligence Service: <a href="https://supo.fi/en/contact" target="_blank"><u>supo.fi/en/contact</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>French organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>French organizations are encouraged to report suspicious activity or incident related information found in this advisory by contacting ANSSI/CERT-FR at: <a href="mailto:cert-fr@ssi.gouv.fr" target="_blank"><u>cert-fr@ssi.gouv.fr</u></a> or by phone at: 3218 or +33 9 70 83 32 18. </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Italian Organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Italian External Intelligence and Security Agency (AISE):  <br>Visit <a href="https://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/" target="_blank"><u>https://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/</u></a>  </li>
<li>Italian Internal Intelligence and Security Agency (AISI):  <br>Visit <a href="https://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/" target="_blank"><u>https://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW214395380 BCX8">
<p><strong>Moldovan organizations </strong></p>
</div>
<div class="ListContainerWrapper SCXW214395380 BCX8">
<ul type="disc">
<li>Security and Intelligence Service of the Republic of Moldova (SIS RM): <a href="mailto:cybersec@sis.md" target="_blank"><u>cybersec@sis.md</u></a> </li>
</ul>
</div>
<p><strong>Polish organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Polish Foreign Intelligence Agency (AW): <a href="mailto:ctiteam@aw.gov.pl" target="_blank"><u>ctiteam@aw.gov.pl</u></a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<h2><strong>Appendix A: MITRE ATT&amp;CK tactics and techniques</strong><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h2>
<p>See <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table9"><strong>Table 9</strong></a> through <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table19"><strong>Table 19</strong></a> for all the threat actor tactics and techniques referenced in this advisory.<a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 9: Reconnaissance </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Gather Victim Identity Information: Credentials </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1589/001/" target="_blank"><u>T1589.001</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The payload attempts to intercept a victim’s password from their password manager. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Gather Victim Identity Information: Email Addresses </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1589/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1589.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The payload attempts to grab the victim’s email address from various data stores. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Search Open Websites/Domains </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1593/" target="_blank"><u>T1593</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This group likely leverages public information to support target development. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Active Scanning </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1595/" target="_blank"><u>T1595</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Port scanning can be used by this group to assist with determining exploitability of identified targets. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Search Open Technical Databases: Scan Databases </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1596/005/" target="_blank"><u>T1596.005</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Various public datasets can provide information to support discovery of exploitable targets. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Search Closed Sources </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1597/" target="_blank"><u>T1597</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Previously exfiltrated data can be used to enhance target development efforts. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Search Closed Sources: Purchase Technical Data </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1597/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1597.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Commercial datasets can also be used to support target development efforts. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="WACAltTextDescribedBy SCXW76044448 BCX8"><a class="ck-anchor"></a></div>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 10: Resource Development </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Acquire Infrastructure </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1583/" target="_blank"><u>T1583</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This group used Mullvad VPN to anonymize traffic sent to operational infrastructure. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Acquire Infrastructure: Virtual Private Server </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1583/003/" target="_blank"><u>T1583.003</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This group procured VPS servers from a variety of vendors. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Develop Capabilities </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/" target="_blank"><u>T1587</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The <em>Ulej</em> capability was developed likely for use by this group to conduct spear phishing campaigns. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Develop Capabilities: Malware </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/001/" target="_blank"><u>T1587.001</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Development of a novel payload that steals a victim’s emails and other sensitive account information. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Develop Capabilities: Exploits </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/004/" target="_blank"><u>T1587.004</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Development of a novel, at the time, cross-site-scripting (XSS) exploit that enables execution of arbitrary JavaScript. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obtain Capabilities: Tool </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1588/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1588.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Open source tools, such as Evilginx2, have also been used by the group. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obtain Capabilities: Artificial Intelligence </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1588/007/" target="_blank"><u>T1588.007</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The group appears to have leveraged AI to support development efforts. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Stage Capabilities </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1608/" target="_blank"><u>T1608</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Flowerbed is deployed to a procured server in the cloud. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 11: Initial Access </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Valid Accounts </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1078/" target="_blank"><u>T1078</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This actor has used commercial datasets to acquire account credentials and gain unauthorized access to accounts. Additionally, this actor is believed to use previously compromised accounts to conduct spear phishing.  </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Trusted Relationship </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1199/" target="_blank"><u>T1199</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The group sends malicious payloads to targeted individuals using previously compromised accounts that might have an established relationship with the target.  </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Phishing </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1566/" target="_blank"><u>T1566</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The actors used spear phishing to lure users into opening malicious email. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 12: Execution </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Exploitation for Client Execution </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1203/" target="_blank"><u>T1203</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>An XSS vulnerability was leveraged to execute the JavaScript payload. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 13: Persistence </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Account Manipulation </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1098/" target="_blank"><u>T1098</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Enabling IMAP and Application Passcodes provides persistent access to the compromised account. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1556/006/" target="_blank"><u>T1556.006</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Creating Application Passcodes to bypass 2FA and stealing a user’s “Scratch Keys,” which can be used in place of a 2FA token. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 14: Privilege Escalation </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Valid Accounts </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1078/" target="_blank"><u>T1078</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This actor has used commercial datasets to acquire account credentials and gain unauthorized privileged access to accounts.  </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 15: Stealth </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obfuscated Files or Information: Command Obfuscation </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/010/" target="_blank"><u>T1027.010</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obfuscated JavaScript payload sent to targets to exploit the XSS vulnerability. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obfuscated Files or Information: Encrypted/Encoded File </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/013/" target="_blank"><u>T1027.013</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The JavaScript payload included both a Base64-encoded and XOR-encrypted inner payload. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obfuscated Files or Information: SVG Smuggling </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/017/" target="_blank"><u>T1027.017</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The payload was contained in an “onload” attribute within an SVG image included in the malicious email. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Use Alternate Authentication Material: Web Session Cookie </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1550/004/" target="_blank"><u>T1550.004</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Previous campaigns using AiTM leveraged stealing and use of a victim’s session cookies to authenticate. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 16: Credential Access </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1556/006/" target="_blank"><u>T1556.006</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Creating Application Passcodes to bypass 2FA and stealing a user’s “Scratch Keys,” which can be used in place of a 2FA token. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Adversary-in-the-Middle </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1557/" target="_blank"><u>T1557</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Previous campaigns used Evilginx2 as an AiTM toolkit to intercept credentials and session cookies. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 17: Collection </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Data Staged: Remote Data Staging </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1074/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1074.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Exfiltrated data was sent to an actor-controlled VPS prior to assumed long-term storage solutions. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Email Collection </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1114/" target="_blank"><u>T1114</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This group has emphasized collection of emails. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Email Collection: Remote Email Collection </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1114/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1114.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Emails are collected via API calls to the ZCS mail server and are not collected from emails stored directly on the victim’s device. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Automated Collection </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1119/" target="_blank"><u>T1119</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Upon execution, the JavaScript payload automatically collects all relevant information in stages. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Browser Session Hijacking </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1185/" target="_blank"><u>T1185</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The JavaScript payload leverages the user’s authenticated browser session to make API requests as the user. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Archive Collected Data </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1560/" target="_blank"><u>T1560</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Emails are exfiltrated with GZIP compression. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 18: Discovery </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Account Discovery </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1087/" target="_blank"><u>T1087</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Stolen Global Access Lists provide the group with new users to target. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 19: Exfiltration </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/" target="_blank"><u>T1048</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Victim information was exfiltrated over both HTTPS and DNS. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Asymmetric Encrypted Non-C2 Protocol </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1048.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Some payloads, especially ones with large amounts of data, were exfiltrated over HTTPS. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/003/" target="_blank"><u>T1048.003</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Some smaller bandwidth payloads were exfiltrated over DNS using Base32 encoding. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<h2><strong>Appendix B: MITRE D3FEND countermeasures </strong><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h2>
<p>See <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table20"><strong>Table 20</strong></a> for a mapping of several of the cybersecurity countermeasures mentioned in this advisory. <a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 20: MITRE D3FEND Countermeasures </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Countermeasure Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Description</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Application Hardening </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ApplicationHardening" target="_blank"><u>D3-AH</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="ListContainerWrapper SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<ul type="disc">
<li>Organizations should immediately prioritize patching <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank"><u>CVE-2025-66376</u></a>.  </li>
<li>Organizations should promptly apply software updates to all email systems. </li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Isolate </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/tactic/d3f:Isolate/" target="_blank"><u>d3f:Isolate</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Organizations that cannot feasibly patch should use alternative mail clients. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Credential Hardening </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:CredentialHardening" target="_blank"><u>D3-CH</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Organizations should consider using a third-party authentication service that supports passkeys to mediate access to ZCS and other services that do not natively support passkeys. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Network Traffic Analysis </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficAnalysis" target="_blank"><u>D3-NTA</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Organizations should monitor for significant amounts of outbound data being sent to IPs associated with VPS providers not used by the organization. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>DNS Traffic Analysis </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:DNSTrafficAnalysis" target="_blank"><u>D3-DNSTA</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Organizations should monitor for frequent DNS queries to a suspicious domain for seemingly random subdomains. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Network Traffic Community Deviation </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficCommunityDeviation" target="_blank"><u>D3-NTCD</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="ListContainerWrapper SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<ul type="disc">
<li>Organizations should monitor for a sudden spike of connections to a server associated with a recently established domain. </li>
<li>Organizations should monitor for connections to internal services, such as webmail, from VPN providers. </li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Identifier Activity Analysis </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:IdentifierActivityAnalysis" target="_blank"><u>D3-IAA</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Organizations should search for the listed known IOCs. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Process Analysis </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ProcessAnalysis" target="_blank"><u>D3-PA</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="ListContainerWrapper SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<ul type="disc">
<li>Organizations should search ZCS log files for specific commands used by the malicious script. </li>
<li>Organizations should search the localStorage property in web browsers for the ZCS webmail client for “ZimbraWeb” Application Passcodes. </li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Message Analysis</td>
<td><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:MessageAnalysis">D3-MA</a></td>
<td>Organizations that suspect they have victims of this campaign should search for emails with a malicious payload to identify other victims.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Akku im Sinkflug – wann lohnt der Tausch, wann muss ein neues Notebook her?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[ParinPix / Shutterstock.com



Die Steckdose wird zum ständigen Begleiter, das Ladekabel zum wichtigsten Accessoire im Rucksack: Wenn der Notebook-Akku nachlässt, wächst unweigerlich der Frust im Alltag. Die schlechte Nachricht: Der chemische Alterungsprozess von Lithium-Ionen-Zellen ist unvermei...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694427/it-security-nachrichten/akku-im-sinkflug-wann-lohnt-der-tausch-wann-muss-ein-neues-notebook-her/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694427/it-security-nachrichten/akku-im-sinkflug-wann-lohnt-der-tausch-wann-muss-ein-neues-notebook-her/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:59:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-21.16.38.png?w=1024" alt="Akku im Sinkflug" class="wp-image-4198584" width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">ParinPix / Shutterstock.com</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Steckdose wird zum ständigen Begleiter, das Ladekabel zum wichtigsten Accessoire im Rucksack: Wenn der <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3158726/akkulaufzeit-unter-windows-11-erhoehen.html" target="_blank">Notebook-Akku</a> nachlässt, wächst unweigerlich der Frust im Alltag. Die schlechte Nachricht: Der chemische Alterungsprozess von Lithium-Ionen-Zellen ist unvermeidbar. Doch ein schwacher Akku bedeutet noch nicht zwingend, dass ein älterer <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2215385/die-besten-laptops-test.html" target="_blank">Laptop</a> in den Elektroschrott gehört. Oft lässt sich der Stromspeicher problemlos austauschen und die Reparatur ist wirtschaftlich sinnvoll. Aber nicht in jedem Fall. Wir zeigen, wie Sie sich an Fakten statt am Bauchgefühl orientieren und wann es Zeit wird, sich nach neuer Hardware umzusehen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Diagnose: Fakten statt Bauchgefühl</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-21.17.04.png?w=851" alt="Diagnose" class="wp-image-4198585" width="851" height="1024" sizes="auto, (max-width: 851px) 100vw, 851px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Foundry</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bevor Sie Schraubenzieher zücken oder neue Hardware kaufen, muss geklärt werden: Ist Ihr Akku wirklich verschlissen, oder saugt ressourcenfressende Software im Hintergrund heimlich den Stromspeicher leer? Die Frage ist schnell beantwortet, denn sowohl Windows als auch macOS bieten tiefgreifende <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3014555/laptop-windows-akkubericht.html" target="_blank">Diagnose-Tools</a>, die sich mit wenigen</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Unter Windows:</strong> Öffnen Sie die Windows-Eingabeaufforderung (CMD) oder PowerShell als Administrator und tippen Sie den Befehl</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code><strong>powercfg /batteryreport</strong></code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ein. Windows generiert daraufhin eine detaillierte HTML-Datei, die tief ins System blicken lässt. Öffnen Sie die Datei unter dem angegebenen Pfad – z.B. „C:\battery-report.html“. Entscheidend sind hier zwei Werte: die <strong>Design Capacity</strong> (die ursprüngliche Nennkapazität Ihres Akkus ab Werk) und die <strong>Full Charge Capacity</strong> (die aktuell noch erreichbare Maximalkapazität). Liegt die aktuelle Kapazität unter <strong>80 Prozent des Ursprungswertes</strong>, gilt ein Akku allgemein als verschlissen. Spätestens wenn er die 70-Prozent-Marke unterschreitet, wird der Kapazitätsverlust im Alltag oft zu einer spürbaren Einschränkung – das Bauteil ist Ende seines Lebenszyklus angekommen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Bei macOS:</strong> Auf einem MacBook führt der Weg über das Apfel-Menü zu <strong>Systemeinstellungen → Allgemein → Info → Systembericht</strong>. Unter dem Reiter „Stromversorgung“ finden Sie die Anzahl der Ladezyklen sowie den Zustand. Apple garantiert in der Regel, dass ein Akku nach 1.000 vollständigen Ladezyklen noch mindestens 80 Prozent seiner ursprünglichen Kapazität halten kann. Fällt der Wert darunter, rät das System oft von selbst zum Service.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Schrauben oder schrauben lassen?</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-21.17.18.png?w=1024" alt="Reparaturanleitungen" class="wp-image-4198586" width="1024" height="684" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Auf <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3174903/notebook-akku-tauschen-oder-neukauf-ratgeber.html#" target="_blank">iFixit</a> finden Verbraucher Reparaturanleitungen, Ersatzteile und Werkzeug für zahlreiche Notebooks, Smartphones und andere Elektronikgeräte.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Foundry</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Steht der Defekt fest oder ist die Alterung bereits weit fortgeschritten, folgt oft eine logistische Herausforderung. Die Hardware-Realität von 2026 ist Verbrauchern nämlich nicht gerade entgegengekommen – zumindest beim Akku: In vielen modernen Ultrabooks, Surface-Geräten oder MacBooks sind die Akkuzellen großflächig im Gehäuse verklebt. Das macht den Tausch für Laien gefährlich, weil bei einer Beschädigung der Zellen <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2590103/akku-brennt-richtig-handeln-und-loeschen.html" target="_blank">akute Brandgefahr</a> besteht.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der Gang zur Fachwerkstatt ist deshalb oft alternativlos – achten Sie hierbei am besten auf zertifizierte Betriebe, die eine <strong>Garantie auf das Ersatzteil</strong> gewähren. Anders sieht es bei reparaturfreundlichen Business-Geräten wie dem <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3174903/notebook-akku-tauschen-oder-neukauf-ratgeber.html#" target="_blank">Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5</a> oder Vorreitern der Modularität wie dem <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2230834/framework-laptop-16-test.html" target="_blank">Framework Laptop 16</a> aus: Hier brauchen Sie oft nur einen passenden Schraubendreher und zehn Minuten Zeit, um den Akku selbst zu tauschen. Wie Sie Ihren Akku am Laptop oder am Smartphone selbst tauschen können, <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2666199/akkutausch-so-klappts-beim-smartphone-und-notebook.html" target="_blank">erklären wir in diesem Ratgeber</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Achtung beim Teilekauf:</strong> Sparen Sie nicht am falschen Ende. Extrem billige Nachbau-Akkus von No-Name-Händlern auf großen Marktplätzen bergen nicht nur ein <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3060569/akku-ladefehler-brandgefahr-vermeiden.html" target="_blank">Brandrisiko</a>, sondern schummeln oft auch bei der echten Kapazität. Greifen Sie <strong>unbedingt zu Originalteilen des Herstellers</strong> oder zu zertifizierten Ersatzteilen etablierter Drittanbieter (wie <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3174903/notebook-akku-tauschen-oder-neukauf-ratgeber.html#" target="_blank">iFixit</a>).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wenn die Diagnose zeigt, dass Ihr Akku physisch noch fit ist, dann liegt das Problem vermutlich an Software mit Selbstbedienungsmentalität. Praktisch: Windows und macOS verfügen über integrierte Stromfresser-Finder. Unter Windows navigieren Sie zu <strong>Einstellungen</strong> <strong>→ Strom und Akku → Akkunutzung</strong>. Dort listet Windows genau auf, welche Apps in den letzten Tagen am meisten Energie verbraucht haben. Auf dem Mac erfüllt die App <strong>Aktivitätsanzeige</strong> (Reiter <strong>Energie</strong>) denselben Zweck. Stoßen Sie hier auf Programme, die Sie gar nicht aktiv nutzen, sollten Sie deren Hintergrundaktivität einschränken oder die Software komplett deinstallieren.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>💡 Infobox: Das neue Recht auf Reparatur (Stand 2026)</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das<strong> Recht auf Reparatur </strong>stammt von der Europäischen Kommission und dem EU-Parlament. Ziel des Gesetzespakets ist es, die wachsenden Berge von Elektroschrott auf dem Kontinent zu reduzieren und die Kreislaufwirtschaft zu stärken. Nach der Verabschiedung der EU-Richtlinie im Jahr 2024 hatten die Mitgliedsstaaten bis 2026 Zeit, die Vorgaben <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3174903/notebook-akku-tauschen-oder-neukauf-ratgeber.html#" target="_blank">in nationales Recht umzusetzen</a> – nun greifen die Regeln schrittweise und wirken sich zunehmend auf den Reparaturalltag aus.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Was Verbraucher davon haben:</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Reparaturpflicht:</strong> Hersteller sind nun gesetzlich verpflichtet, für gängige Elektronikgeräte (wie Smartphones und Laptops) Reparaturen anzubieten – und das auch nach Ablauf der gesetzlichen Gewährleistung.</li>



<li><strong>Zugang zu Ersatzteilen:</strong> Unabhängige Fachwerkstätten und ambitionierte Bastler erhalten leichteren Zugang zu Original-Ersatzteilen und offiziellen Reparaturanleitungen.</li>



<li><strong>Weniger Software-Sperren:</strong> Praktiken wie das sogenannte “Parts Pairing” (bei dem Ersatzteile per Software blockiert werden, wenn sie nicht von einer offiziellen Vertragswerkstatt eingebaut wurden) werden stark eingeschränkt.</li>



<li><strong>Mehr Wirtschaftlichkeit:</strong> Durch den faireren Wettbewerb sinken die Reparaturkosten, was den Tausch eines Akkus oft attraktiver macht als einen teuren Neukauf.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Wann lohnt sich der Tausch?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Um zu beurteilen, ob sich die Investition für den Austausch lohnt, hilft die bewährte <strong>50-Prozent-Regel</strong>: Übersteigen die Kosten für die Reparatur (Ersatz-Akku plus eventuelle Arbeitszeit der Werkstatt) mehr als die Hälfte des aktuellen Restwerts des Notebooks, wird die Angelegenheit unwirtschaftlich.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Ein Rechenbeispiel:</strong> Ein vier Jahre altes Premium-Notebook, das früher mal 1.500 Euro gekostet hat, bringt auf dem Gebrauchtmarkt vielleicht noch 400 bis 500 Euro. Eine Investition von 120 Euro für einen fachgerechten Akkutausch ist dann noch durchaus sinnvoll und kann dem Gerät weitere zwei bis drei Lebensjahre verschaffen. Bei einem ohnehin leistungsschwachen 400-Euro-Plastikbomber aus dem Jahr 2021 ist eine 100-Euro-Reparatur jedoch (jenseits von Nostalgiegründen) kaum zu vertreten und gilt als unwirtschaftlich.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Wann ein Neukauf wirklich sinnvoll ist</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mal ehrlich: Der Akku ist oft nur das offensichtlichste Symptom eines veralteten Systems. Wer über eine Reparatur nachdenkt, sollte objektiv prüfen, ob die restliche Hardware den heutigen Anforderungen noch gewachsen ist – oder ob man mit einem <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2215385/die-besten-laptops-test.html" target="_blank">neuen Laptop</a> besser fährt:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Windows 10 Support-Ende:</strong> Das offizielle Support-Ende von Windows 10 (Oktober 2025) liegt bereits hinter uns. Privatanwender in der EU haben zwar <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2941599/windows-10-gratis-sicher-nutzen-esu-registrierung-so-gehts.html" target="_blank">Glück im Unglück</a>: Wer mit einem Microsoft-Konto angemeldet ist, <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3177497/windows-10-bekommt-ein-weiteres-jahr-lang-updates.html" target="_blank">erhält die Extended Security Updates (ESU) im ersten Jahr bis Oktober 2027 kostenlos.</a> Doch spätestens im Herbst 2027 ist endgültig Schicht im Schacht. Geräte, deren Prozessoren nicht offiziell für Windows 11 zertifiziert sind (ältere CPUs vor der Intel Core 8. Generation oder AMD Ryzen 2000er-Serie), stoßen dann an ihre praktische Lebensdauergrenze. Ohne den auslaufenden ESU-Schutz sollten Sie ab diesem Zeitpunkt bei betroffenen Windows-Geräten nicht mehr in einen neuen Akku investieren.</li>



<li><strong>Speicher-Flaschenhälse:</strong> Verlöteter, nicht aufrüstbarer Arbeitsspeicher von 8 GB stößt selbst bei ausschließlicher Browser-Nutzung und Office-Anwendungen oft an seine Grenzen.</li>



<li><strong>Träge Performance:</strong> Wenn das Notebook nicht nur schnell leer ist, sondern beim Öffnen von Programmen ins Schwitzen kommt und der Lüfter permanent auf Hochtouren läuft, bringt auch der stärkste neue Akku kein flüssiges Arbeitsgefühl zurück.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Zeit für einen neuen Laptop?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wenn kein (sinnvoller) Weg mehr am Neukauf vorbeiführt, ist das nicht immer eine schlechte Nachricht: Moderne Geräte punkten nicht nur mit deutlich mehr Ausdauer jenseits der Steckdose – sie bringen auch spürbar mehr Tempo und Sicherheit, effizientere Hardware und oft angenehm leise Kühlung in Ihren Alltag.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Fazit und Checkliste: Akku tauschen oder Neukauf?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Entscheidung zwischen Werkstatt und Neuanschaffung ist am Ende des Tages ein Abwägen von Kosten, Nutzen und Sicherheit. Die folgende Checkliste hilft dabei, das Schicksal Ihres Notebooks zu klären:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Der Tausch lohnt sich, wenn:</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>der Laptop noch alle Leistungsanforderungen im Alltag erfüllt.</li>



<li>Windows 11 offiziell unterstützt wird (oder macOS/Linux aktuell ist).</li>



<li>die Gesamtreparatur weniger als 50 % des Restwerts kostet.</li>



<li>das Gehäuse unbeschädigt ist und Scharniere sowie Tastatur noch zuverlässig funktionieren.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Ein Neukauf ist besser, wenn:</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>das Betriebssystem (z. B. Windows 10) keine Sicherheitsupdates mehr erhält.</li>



<li>das Gerät durch 8 GB RAM oder eine alte CPU ohnehin ein Flaschenhals im Alltag ist.</li>



<li>Displayschäden oder defekte Ports weitere, teure Reparaturen erfordern.</li>



<li>die Reparatur den Zeitwert des Geräts deutlich übersteigt.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3174903/notebook-akku-tauschen-oder-neukauf-ratgeber.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3174903/notebook-akku-tauschen-oder-neukauf-ratgeber.html" target="_blank">PC-Welt</a>)</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[From Principles to Practice: Actionable Blueprints for Ethical AI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Part 2 of this series on ethical AI looks at operationalizing trust with clear prompting framework and robust data governance for your public- or private-sector organization.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694401/it-security-nachrichten/from-principles-to-practice-actionable-blueprints-for-ethical-ai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694401/it-security-nachrichten/from-principles-to-practice-actionable-blueprints-for-ethical-ai/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:57:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Part 2 of this series on ethical AI looks at operationalizing trust with clear prompting framework and robust data governance for your public- or private-sector organization.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI success requires a full-stack CIO]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Every CIO I speak with today is wrestling with some version of the same question: How do we move faster with AI and deliver on our commitments?



It’s an understandable concern. Boards and CEOs are asking about AI. Business leaders are experimenting with use cases. Employees are discovering tool...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694399/it-security-nachrichten/ai-success-requires-a-full-stack-cio/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694399/it-security-nachrichten/ai-success-requires-a-full-stack-cio/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:57:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every CIO I speak with today is wrestling with some version of the same question: How do we move faster with AI and deliver on our commitments?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s an understandable concern. <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4171959/ceos-top-priorities-for-it-leaders-today-2.html">Boards and CEOs are asking about AI</a>. Business leaders are experimenting with use cases. Employees are discovering tools daily, while technology vendors promise unprecedented gains in productivity, innovation, and competitive advantage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After hundreds of conversations with technology executives over the past year, I’ve become convinced that speed isn’t the real issue. The organizations pulling away from the pack aren’t necessarily adopting AI faster than everyone else. They’re executing more effectively — a subtle distinction that represents one of the defining leadership challenges of the AI era.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Technology has never been the hardest part of transformation. People, priorities, culture, and operating models are the biggest challenges. The ability to translate bold boardroom aspirations into thousands of thoughtful decisions made every day by architects, engineers, product managers, analysts, and business leaders is where competitive advantage is created. AI may be accelerating the pace of change, but it hasn’t changed that fundamental truth.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve met plenty of executives who are exceptional in the boardroom. They know how to frame a vision, <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/272180/relationship-building-networking-how-to-wow-your-board-of-directors.html">influence a board</a>, and build confidence among investors and business leaders. I’ve also met remarkable technologists who instinctively understand the architectural decisions, engineering tradeoffs, and implementation details that determine how great ideas become reality. Modern CIOs, however, must move comfortably between both worlds. Afshean Talasaz is one who stands out among this rare breed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Long before becoming CIO of Colonial Pipeline, Talasaz built his career from the ground up as a business professional, data scientist, and technologist. He has designed enterprise platforms, built AI capabilities, led technology organizations, and partnered closely with executive leadership teams on business transformation. Today, as an executive in residence with our Practitioners for Practitioners (P4P) community, he helps CIOs and business leaders navigate one of the most significant technology shifts of our generation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While Talasaz brings deep knowledge of data and AI to the table, his greatest strength is his ability to create strategy and connect it with execution. He can spend the morning discussing enterprise reinvention with the board and the afternoon debating architectural principles with the teams responsible for bringing that vision to life.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That versatility gives Talasaz a unique lens on how CIOs <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178006/state-of-the-cio-2026-cios-set-the-course-for-ai-roi.html">can deliver value with AI</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Software companies have a term for engineers who understand every layer of the technology stack: full-stack developers. Listen to Talasaz and it becomes evident that the AI era requires something similar from technology leaders: a full-stack CIO.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The full-stack CIO: Leading with clarity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A full-stack CIO understands how every layer of the enterprise influences the next. They recognize that every strategic priority becomes a portfolio investment, every investment shapes an operating model, every operating model influences architecture, every architecture choice informs product decisions, every product decision shapes engineering priorities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best CIOs understand both ends of that journey. The extraordinary ones understand everything in between.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And those who execute best lead with clarity, Talasaz says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Everyone, from executives to middle managers to the people writing code, should be able to explain what we’re trying to achieve,” he emphasizes. “Clarity isn’t that we’ve handed out the PowerPoint. It’s that people genuinely understand where we’re going and can articulate it in their own language.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the unintended consequences of the AI boom is that organizations are beginning to confuse activity with alignment. They have AI councils, AI governance committees, AI innovation labs, AI centers of excellence, AI pilots, and AI roadmaps. Yet if you stop ten people in the hallway and ask a deceptively simple question, What business problem are we actually trying to solve? you’ll often hear ten different answers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a result, architects optimize for one objective while product teams optimize for another. Business units pursue opportunities that seem perfectly reasonable from their perspective. Engineers make thoughtful technical decisions based on the information available to them. Individually, none of those decisions are necessarily wrong. Collectively, however, they create organizational drift. AI doesn’t create that problem. It simply accelerates the consequences.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And while AI can be a force multiplier for the positive when every decision is guided by a shared understanding of where the organization is headed, it can also be a force multiplier for the negative, resulting in an organization simply moving faster in different directions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When we have the fundamentals right, the tech infrastructure, the operating models, the nuances of how our business actually runs, we get the impacts of AI in a positive way,” Talasaz says. “When we don’t have those in place, AI can amplify the gaps or mute the benefits.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At a time when so much of the conversation surrounding AI is focused on algorithms, agents, and automation, it’s an important reminder that organizations don’t execute strategy; people do.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Reducing organizational friction</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most executives are familiar with the concept of VUCA that characterizes today’s business environment. But Talasaz stresses the importance of turning this concern inward: “If the world outside our organizations is becoming more volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous, what are we, as leaders, doing to the inside of our organizations?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Leaders spend enormous amounts of time helping their organizations respond to external disruption but comparatively little time asking whether they are inadvertently re-creating those same conditions internally in response to those external needs. Are we reducing uncertainty or introducing more of it? Are we simplifying work or adding unnecessary complexity? Are we helping people focus on what matters most, or asking them to navigate competing priorities and shifting expectations?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Talasaz refers to this phenomenon as double VUCA — something I’ve witnessed repeatedly while working with CIOs over the past decade. Organizations often assume they’re struggling because of technology limitations when the real constraint is organizational friction. Teams wait for decisions. Priorities shift faster than roadmaps. Governance grows heavier. New committees are formed to solve problems created by existing committees. Everyone is working harder, yet the organization somehow feels slower.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI amplifies both outcomes. Organizations with clarity become dramatically more effective because AI accelerates good decisions. Organizations without clarity simply accelerate confusion.</p>



<h1 class="wp-block-heading">Operating model as strategy enabler</h1>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI governance is one way to achieve greater clarity, but as Talasaz says, governance shouldn’t primarily exist inside policy manuals that few people read.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead, AI governance should be embedded in the daily rhythms of the organization, shaping how teams collaborate, how decisions are made, how products move from ideas into production, and how innovation happens safely without requiring constant escalation. In other words, it’s all about your operating model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“If you had to pick one thing that isn’t technology, your operating model is the most important element for executing data and AI at scale,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best operating models create enough clarity that capable people can make thousands of decisions independently and confidently, without having to wait for permission. By embedding good governance into the way it works, the organization becomes faster.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This advice echoes something I’ve heard repeatedly from some of the world’s most respected CIOs: High-performing organizations aren’t built on tighter control; they’re built on greater trust, supported by clear principles, shared expectations, and operating models that enable responsible decision-making at every level of the enterprise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Talasaz points out that technology leaders tend to speak in terms of <em>transformation</em>. He suggests CIOs consider a different word: <em>reinvention.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As he explains, transformation implies replacing what exists today with something new. Reinvention starts with a more clear-eyed and practical premise: Some things absolutely must change; others represent years, sometimes decades, of accumulated expertise, customer trust, operational discipline, and competitive advantage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Reinvention is about building on those strengths while also creating new ways to deliver value. The leaders making the greatest progress in their AI journeys seem to recognize that it’s less about abandoning the past than thoughtfully preparing the organization for the future.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Closing the gap between strategy and execution</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Full-stack CIOs must be able to map out the various layers of execution and planning that need to be done at every level of the organization to be successful. To help with this, Talasaz has developed a data and AI framework that draws on his own experiences “from the keyboard to the boardroom.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As Talasaz sees it, too many organizations have been doing good work in isolation. “They’re doing a lot of the right things,” he says. “They’re just not connected.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Boards may be discussing growth while business leaders redesign customer experiences. Product teams may be prioritizing new capabilities while architects modernize platforms. Data teams may be improving quality while engineers focus on delivery. Every group makes meaningful progress within its own domain, yet somewhere between strategy and execution, the connective tissue begins to disappear. Talasaz’s framework brings those connecting points to the forefront.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Crucially, the framework doesn’t begin with technology or AI or even with data. It begins with the experiences the organization hopes to create for its customers, employees, or partners. Many AI initiatives start with the question, “What can this technology do?” And indeed, we need to be inspired by the possibilities and challenged to think differently by what the technology can do. But, Talasaz emphasizes, we also need to ask what experiences we need to deliver for our business and how the technology can make that a reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The framework challenges CIOs to answer that question first. Only after the experiences are clearly defined does the conversation move to the capabilities required to deliver it, the business activities that support those capabilities, the AI and data products that enable them, and finally the data foundation that makes everything possible.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This shift in perspective ensures that, rather than allowing technology investments to search for business value, the business experience defines the technology required to deliver it. For CIOs, that’s more than a planning exercise. It’s a fundamentally different way of leading.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Over the coming months, the P4P community will be convening a series of small CxO roundtables to explore these issues and work more deeply with Afshean Talasaz’s 6×6 Data and AI Framework. CIOs and other enterprise leaders interested in participating are welcome to <a href="mailto:droberts@ouellette-online.com?subject=P4P:%206x6%20Framework%20Roundtable">reach out to me directly</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The new value architecture of the AI-native SaaS era]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The traditional methods of measuring success no longer tell the full story. Here’s what should replace them — and why.



In brief:




AI is transforming software as a service (SaaS), and the old ways of keeping score no longer apply.



Smart companies are evolving new metrics that provide deep...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694395/it-security-nachrichten/the-new-value-architecture-of-the-ai-native-saas-era/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694395/it-security-nachrichten/the-new-value-architecture-of-the-ai-native-saas-era/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The traditional methods of measuring success no longer tell the full story. Here’s what should replace them — and why.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In brief:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4146669/is-ai-the-end-of-saas-as-we-know-it.html">AI is transforming software as a service (SaaS)</a>, and the old ways of keeping score no longer apply.</li>



<li>Smart companies are evolving new metrics that provide deeper insight into how AI-native software is performing in a new marketplace.</li>



<li>These changes impact everything from pricing to valuations.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The transformation of the software-as-a-service (SaaS) industry toward AI-native operating companies is rapidly changing the unit of value across the industry.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The traditional metric of seats — which measured access — is rapidly giving way to credits designed to measure work performed. This evolution is upending the industry in multiple ways, impacting everything from pricing to enterprise valuations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While many companies still cling to seat-based metrics to measure growth, efficiency and durability, the future is likely to be one in which companies utilize a <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4184688/it-hurtles-toward-the-great-enterprise-pricing-reset.html">credit-centric metrics framework</a>, with seats and outcomes as the bookends of a spectrum.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why do software companies need new metrics?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Why the rethink, and why now? There are five major forces that are driving this shift:</p>



<ol start="1" class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.idc.com/resource-center/blog/is-saas-dead-rethinking-the-future-of-software-in-the-age-of-ai/"><strong>The unit of value is changing</strong></a><strong>.</strong> Seats measured who could access software, and credits measure what the software actually does. But in an AI-native world, agents don’t have seats; they have workloads. Over the past 18 months, every major SaaS platform has moved to some forms of credit or consumption unit.</li>



<li><strong>The cost of goods sold (COGS) is exploding.</strong> AI inference adds real per-unit costs that scale with usage. In an AI-native world, software companies can’t scale to infinite users at near‑zero marginal cost as before.</li>



<li><strong>Buying is moving up the org chart.</strong> AI-native applications shift purchasing to higher-level operators — such as line-of-business leaders or chief operating officers — which expands the market from software budgets to labor budgets. And because AI agents replace services as well as software, the total market opportunity is 3x to 10x larger than traditional SaaS.</li>



<li><strong>Time to value (TTV) is collapsing.</strong> With AI-native tools, customers start seeing meaningful results in weeks rather than quarters. Onboarding and setup are fast, workflows are pre-built, and there’s no need for extensive customer success or professional services — dramatically reducing implementation time and costs.</li>



<li><strong>Retention is bifurcating.</strong> AI forces clarity in a way that traditional SaaS couldn’t. Products that can provide value become even “stickier” and retain customers. Those that don’t churn faster. In an AI-native marketplace, the middle disappears.</li>
</ol>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How this shift is impacting pricing</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.ey.com/en_us/insights/strategy/grow-with-trusted-software-portfolio-management">Given how AI-native software is transforming the market</a>, the shift to more variable pricing options is inevitable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Seats won’t go away completely. Subscription pricing based on the number of users is stable and predictable and will continue to work for some customers. Tokens — the use of pass-through pricing for underlying compute — will fit those customers where the AI feature is commoditized or the buyer wants transparency into costs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Credits will likely become the dominant architecture because they provide a simple metric for both customers and providers. The vendor sets the conversation ratio between credits and underlying compute, shielding the customer from inference cost details. Credits are easy to understand and can be packaged into annual contracts for multiple features and products.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Finally, the industry will likely see <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2026-07-01-gartner-says-us-dollars-234-billion-in-enterprise-application-software-spend-is-at-risk-from-agentic-artificial-intelligence">some move toward outcome-based pricing</a> for results such as resolved tickets, recovered revenue or qualified leads. This strategy will mostly be limited to verticals where it is easy to prove AI impacted the result.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Where a software vendor sits on this spectrum is a signal of differentiation and pricing power. Credits are where most defensible AI-native businesses are landing because they balance customer predictability with vendor margin control.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How AI upends classic SaaS metrics</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When SaaS was in its infancy, companies settled on key metrics designed to answer a small set of core questions. Are we growing? Are customers using the product? Are we retaining and expanding accounts?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But as AI upends software itself, it is also requiring companies to adopt new metrics to track success. These new metrics fall into three primary buckets, rebuilt around the pricing spectrum described earlier and the trend toward credits as the primary frame:</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Revenue composition</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Committed credit annual recurring revenue (ARR) vs. burndown ARR: Measuring the credits sold on annual commitment vs. those consumed and replenished. This is the single most important split for valuation. Committed credits behave like subscription and burndown behaves like usage.</li>



<li>Credit utilization rate: The percentage of purchased credits consumed per period. This is a leading indicator of renewal sizing.</li>



<li>Credit burn velocity: How fast is a customer consuming their credits, and is that consumption increasing or decreasing quarter over quarter? This metric predicts expansion or contraction before it shows up in ARR.</li>



<li>Effective price per credit: The real revenue per credit after discounts, overage and rollover, which can detect revenue leakage and help companies set smarter guide rails.</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Margin reality</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Credit margin: The gross profit the company earns per credit after subtracting inference costs. This is the core economic unit for AI-native, usage-based businesses — the replacement for gross margin per seat used in SaaS.</li>



<li>Inference-adjusted gross margin: By carving out AI inference costs separately in the P&amp;L statement, you can see true AI margins, avoid hiding deterioration inside blended SaaS margins, and clearly distinguish AI economics from legacy SaaS economics.</li>



<li>Compute leverage ratio: This metric measures how efficiently the business converts compute spend into revenue. It shows whether your AI margins are improving as you scale.</li>



<li>AI-adjusted “Rule of 40”: This updated metric recalibrates the traditional growth and profitability benchmark to account for AI’s lower gross margins and variable inference costs, giving a more accurate picture of business health for AI-native companies.</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Behavioral and value signals</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Time-to-first outcome: Replaces traditional onboarding metrics. Tracks how fast a customer reaches their first measurable result.</li>



<li>Adoption: AI-native adoption is measured by workflow penetration and active agent density, not seat count. As AI replaces human-driven usage, the unit of adoption shifts from people to automated workflows and agents.</li>



<li>Net credit retention (NCR): Credit-volume retention across the customer base, tracked separately from net recurring revenue to avoid price-change impact.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Along with these new metrics, the industry’s transformation is prompting companies to retire or recalibrate old SaaS measures, including per-seat ARR as a primary key performance indicator (KPI), traditional magic number calibrated to subscription dynamics, unadjusted Rule of 40, customer success metrics tied to human touchpoints, and blended gross margin without AI COGS carve-outs.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What does this mean for enterprise value calculations?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As the internal metrics of success change, so do the ways the investment community measures growth and long-term viability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Increasingly, a company’s valuation multiple depends on whether its revenue behaves like committed subscription ARR or volatile usage ARR, and the commit‑to‑burndown ratio is the metric investors use to decide where the company fits.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For example, a business with 80% committed credit ARR could trade closer to subscription comps and one with 80% burndown could trade closer to usage comps even though both have the same types of customers. Being able to proactively explain the commit‑to‑burndown mix can help companies avoid undervaluation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In addition, utilization is expected to replace net promoter scores and seat usage as the primary predictor of churn or expansion. Low utilization guarantees downsizing at renewal, so companies must track utilization cohorts the same way SaaS tracks logo retention cohorts today.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We’re also seeing an inversion of the operating model, with R&amp;D and COGS moving up the P&amp;L and sales and marketing (S&amp;M) and customer success (CS) moving down or sideways. The net operating leverage profile is structurally different from classical SaaS, and the cost-to-scale curve looks different too.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Finally, credit margin engineering is a hidden value-creation lever. The gap between price per credit and cost per credit is set by the software vendor and can be optimized. Most operators have barely started managing this rigorously, and the ones who do will pull away on margin.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What this means for leaders, boards and investors</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The shift from classic SaaS metrics to new AI‑native measures isn’t cosmetic. It represents the seismic change the industry is experiencing as AI matures and transforms products and organizations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While these metrics — and perhaps others yet to be determined — may evolve over time, there is no doubt they are already changing how AI companies allocate capital, price products, incent sales teams, evaluate performance and communicate with investors.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s important to remember that SaaS metrics were practical tools for a specific era of software. As that era draws to a close, winning companies will choose new metrics that shape behavior and drive smart decision-making.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>The views reflected in this article are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Ernst &amp; Young LLP or other members of the global EY organization.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Stop asking AI nicely: Here’s how to get work-ready results every time]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Over the past few years, I have learned that basic prompts produce inconsistent, hallucination-prone results that no executive would trust in production. What turned the tide was my move to advanced prompting techniques. These weren’t theoretical experiments; they became a practical foundation fo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694396/it-security-nachrichten/stop-asking-ai-nicely-heres-how-to-get-work-ready-results-every-time/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694396/it-security-nachrichten/stop-asking-ai-nicely-heres-how-to-get-work-ready-results-every-time/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over the past few years, I have learned that basic prompts produce inconsistent, hallucination-prone results that no executive would trust in production. What turned the tide was my move to advanced prompting techniques. These weren’t theoretical experiments; they became a practical foundation for reliable, measurable outcomes. I want to share the techniques that consistently delivered the biggest gains in my projects, complete with real before-and-after examples, copy-paste templates, lessons from failures and guidance on when to evolve beyond prompting to agentic systems.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why advanced prompting still matters in enterprise settings</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sophisticated prompting remains essential for control, reliability and compliance. If you “ask nicely” and hope for the best, you need deterministic behavior, auditable reasoning and minimal risk of hallucination. Here’s what worked for me.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">1. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and its variants: Unlocking step-by-step reasoning</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>The problem:</strong> Models would jump to conclusions on complex analysis tasks, especially involving data interpretation or multi-step logic.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>What I did:</strong> I started explicitly instructing the model to “think step by step” and show its reasoning.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Before (basic prompt): </strong>“Analyze last quarter’s sales data and recommend three actions.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>After (CoT prompt):</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You’re a senior business analyst. Analyze the following sales data step by step: [data]. First, identify the key trends. Second, calculate the rates and anomalies. Third, link findings to business context. Finally, recommend the three prioritized actions with expected impact. Explain your reasoning at each step.”  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Results:</strong> Accuracy and depth improved dramatically.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Variants that worked well:</strong> Self-consistency. I ran the same CoT prompt multiple times and took the majority consensus. This reduced variability significantly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Template you can use:</strong></p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>You are [expert role]. Solve this problem by thinking step by step.

[Task or question]

For each step:

1. State your observation or calculation.

2. Explain the implication.

3. Proceed only when confident.

Final answer in this format: [structured output]</code></pre>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">2. Tree-of-Thoughts (ToT): Exploring multiple reasoning paths</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For truly complex decisions such as resource allocation or risk assessment, linear CoT isn’t enough. Tree-of-Thoughts lets the model generate and evaluate multiple branches.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Example:</strong> I was helping a client evaluate three potential vendor platforms for an AI deployment. A standard prompt gave a superficial comparison. With ToT</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Prompt Snippet:</strong></p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>Explore three different reasoning paths for selecting the best vendor platform:

Path 1: Focus on cost and scalability.

Path 2: Focus on security, compliance and integration.

Path 3: Focus on innovation and long-term roadmap.

For each path, evaluate pros/cons against our requirements [list].

Then, compare the paths and recommend the strongest overall option with justification.</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Outcome:</strong> The model surfaced nuanced trade-offs (e.g., one vendor had superior security, but higher integration cost).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>When to use:</strong> Strategic planning, troubleshooting or scenarios with high uncertainty and multiple viable approaches.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">3. ReAct (Reason+ Act) and prompt chaining: Moving toward agentic behavior</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the biggest leaps I have noticed comes from combining reasoning with tool use and chaining prompts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ReAct example</strong>: (used in data analytics workflow)</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>You are an AI analyst with access to tools. For the query below:

1. Reason about what information you need.

2. Choose the appropriate tool or action.

3. Observe the result.

4. Repeat until you can answer confidently.

Query: [user request]</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In practice, I chained this with retrieval tools. One automated quarterly compliance reporting; the system reasoned about required data, pulled relevant records, validated them, and generated the reports.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">4. Meta-prompting and self-reflection: Letting the model improve itself</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Use the model to refine its own prompt. This is a huge time-saver.</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>You are an expert prompt engineer. Improve the following prompt for clarity, structure and effectiveness with [target model]. Make it more precise while preserving intent.

Original prompt: [paste]

Provide the improved version and explain your changes.</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Self-reflection loops (asking the model to critique its own output and revise) are a game-changer for content generation and code-review tasks.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">5. Multimodal and structured output techniques</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With vision-enabled models, I started combining text with images (e.g., uploading architecture diagrams or dashboards).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Tip from experience:</strong> Be extremely specific in describing what the models should focus on.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Best practices I learned the hard way</h4>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Start simple, then layer complexity</strong>: Over-engineered prompts from Day One usually backfire.</li>



<li><strong>Model specific tuning:</strong> Some models respond better to XML delimiters; others to explicit reasoning.</li>



<li><strong>Evaluation and versioning:</strong> Treat prompts like code if you track versions and run automated evals.</li>



<li><strong>Security guardrails:</strong> Always include instructions against prompt injections and respect data boundaries.</li>



<li><strong>When to stop prompting</strong>: For repetitive, high-stakes workflows, move to full agents or an orchestration framework.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Final takeaways for technical leaders</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Advanced prompt engineering has now become a core competency for anyone responsible for enterprise AI outcomes. Start by picking one technique and apply it rigorously to a real business problem. Document before/ after and you will notice why it’s worth mastering.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The field continues evolving towards more automated and agentic systems, but the ability to precisely direct AI reasoning remains foundational.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why I changed how I pitch AI: It’s no longer about saving money, but managing tokens and adoption]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I have worked alongside enterprise technology for more than 30 years and watched AI evolve from a lab experiment into the modern boardroom’s core focus. However, the last few years of implementing AI alongside our customers have delivered our most profound reality checks.



The initial hype has ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694390/it-security-nachrichten/why-i-changed-how-i-pitch-ai-its-no-longer-about-saving-money-but-managing-tokens-and-adoption/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694390/it-security-nachrichten/why-i-changed-how-i-pitch-ai-its-no-longer-about-saving-money-but-managing-tokens-and-adoption/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have worked alongside enterprise technology for more than 30 years and watched AI evolve from a lab experiment into the modern boardroom’s core focus. However, the last few years of implementing AI alongside our customers have delivered our most profound reality checks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The initial hype has faded, leaving CIOs to drive real enterprise value. Based on my experience implementing Google, OpenAI and Anthropic technologies, here are the fundamental, technology-agnostic lessons every leader must anchor their strategy around.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>AI as a leadership multiplier</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most common tactical error we see is treating AI as an isolated technology project. What I have observed among our customers is that true success does not come from organizations that define a standalone “AI strategy,” but rather from those leaders that integrate AI into their business strategy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When our customers isolate AI and define an AI strategy, it inevitably treats it like a “technological toy” to experiment with. This approach yields fragmented, orphaned initiatives that fail to scale because they are fundamentally disconnected from their core corporate objectives. What I learned is that AI is not the ultimate destination; it is a powerful catalyst. We have replaced “What can AI do for our customers?” with a more strategic question, “How does AI accelerate their existing business goals?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Think of AI like electricity. No modern corporation designs a standalone “electricity strategy.” Instead, all companies route it invisibly across the entire organization to illuminate offices, power production lines and drive communication. AI must be woven into the enterprise fabric in the exact same way, acting as an underlying utility that supercharges your existing operational model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Integrating AI into the broader business strategy also dictates how we measure success. It forces a shift away from short-term tech vanity metrics and anchors the technology into a long-term roadmap.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When AI remains trapped within the IT department of our customers, we notice that it is relegated to a mere “software experiment.” To become a true competitive advantage, we observed that AI requires intense cross-functional orchestration. This perspective does not diminish the merit of the technical team; their expertise is fundamental for establishing the architecture, data governance and tools your enterprise requires. However, while IT builds the foundational infrastructure, it lacks the organizational authority to decide what should be built on top of it. Only the CEO or the owner of the company can step in to ensure AI leaves the “toy project” phase and integrates into the DNA of the organization.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The requirement for top-down, executive ownership stems from three critical realities observed in the field:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Silo-smashing and data collaboration:</strong> True enterprise AI is data-hungry and that data lives across disparate business lines, finance, operations, marketing and customer service. Only the CEO possesses the cross-functional authority to demand that data silos be dismantled.</li>



<li><strong>Cultural transformation and fear mitigation:</strong> AI triggers widespread anxiety over job displacement across all industries and hierarchies. When relegated to an “IT project,” resistance spikes as teams view it as a threat to their livelihoods. When I saw the CEO lead this cultural shift directly is when I noticed the best results.</li>



<li><strong>C-Suite education and strategic alignment:</strong> The mandate for AI capability cannot just be delegated downward; the transformation must begin at the very top. I have conducted more than 70 presentations for the Board of Directors and C-Level teams. These people need to be actively educated not on technical code, but on specific business use cases, return on investment (ROI) frameworks and how AI resolves core organizational bottlenecks.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/c-suite-insights/ceo-survey.html">PwC’s data found that only 12% of enterprises have achieved both cost and revenue benefits from AI</a>. Those elite 12% succeeded precisely because their CEOs embedded AI extensively across <em>strategic decision-making and cross-functional workflows</em>. AI is simply too disruptive and too critical to be left exclusively in the hands of technical experts. If AI is not on the CEO’s weekly agenda, it is fundamentally missing from the company’s true strategy.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>AI as a new operational framework</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Traditional IT systems have operated on strict algorithmic certainty: if you input a specific set of data, the system executes an immutable line of code and guarantees the same, predictable output every single time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI completely breaks this paradigm. Because modern AI is built on probabilistic models, it does not execute static formulas; instead, it predicts the most likely correct response based on mathematical probabilities. This means that AI solutions carry an inherent, small percentage of uncertainty and variability. A prompt entered today might yield a slightly different, though contextually valid, output tomorrow.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Executive leadership and organizational cultures must be actively educated to accept and navigate this fundamental shift. Traditional quality assurance frameworks for software are designed for a 100% success rate. Applying this rigid standard to AI will paralyze your initiatives, keeping 80% of your projects trapped eternally in the pilot phase. This happened to us in a food and beverage company in Latin America a couple of years ago. After this experience, we started to include conditions in our contracts that tolerate statistical margins of error and still define the project as a success.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In terms of cost calculation, we had to teach CIOs and business managers to forget the monthly subscription model for AI and learn to manage the primary unit of exchange in modern AI: the token.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To understand AI costs, executives must understand how large language models process data. AI models do not read full words; instead, they break text, images or code down into “pieces” called tokens. As a baseline, every 100 words process as approximately 130 to 140 tokens. Because the major AI providers use the token as their currency, <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.22750">your business is billed dynamically based on the exact volume of tokens consumed</a> by every query submitted (input) and every response generated (output).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many leaders believe AI costs are fixed due to flat-rate enterprise tiers ($25–$30/user). This is a temporary illusion. These venture-capital-subsidized rates mask true operational costs and come with dynamic usage limits. Modeling long-term ROI on them guarantees a severe budget shock when true consumption pricing takes over.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The solution is not to halt AI adoption; doing so means losing your competitive edge. Instead, the cost per token must cease to be treated as a technical footnote relegated to the IT department. It must be elevated to a core business variable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Risks in the AI adoption model</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Since the beginning of the AI boom, I have seen all our customers making a critical tactical error that could cost them heavily in the medium term: they are focusing only on operational efficiency (reducing costs with AI).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have observed that an alarmingly high percentage of companies remain trapped in pilot phases focused exclusively on short-term cost reduction. <a href="https://www.bain.com/insights/your-ai-budget-is-growing-your-returns-arent-heres-why/">Bain &amp; Company’s global Automation and AI Pathfinder Survey </a>found that the largest share of companies measuring their AI initiatives (exactly 40%) realized cost reductions of 10% or less, heavily missing their internal targets. Our customers are putting too many resources and effort into marginal financial gains and in doing so, they are jeopardizing their most valuable assets: service quality, resilience and customer trust.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Utilizing AI solely to slash headcount or cut operational corners is a dangerous trap that introduces severe field liabilities. A financial service organization in Latin America announced that they saved $1 million in customer support by replacing humans with AI chatbots. However, the mid-term reality revealed a different story: a damaged brand reputation due to AI errors and an influx of frustrated clients fleeing because the automated system cannot handle special cases.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Putting a company on an extreme AI diet might make it look leaner on next quarter’s financial statement, but over-indexing on cost-cutting will ultimately leave the business too weak to compete when market dynamics shift. We are now inviting our customers to change the question from <em>“How much money will AI save us?”</em> to <em>“How will we leverage AI to exponentially increase the long-term value of our enterprise?”</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Deploying enterprise AI is a marathon, not a sprint, and the terrain changes with every mile. The organizations that thrive in this next era will be those that transition from fascination to discipline, treating AI not as a magic bullet for immediate savings, but as a core capability that demands rigorous governance, architectural foresight and cultural maturity. Navigating this shift requires moving past the theoretical hype and anchoring decisions in raw, field-tested reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As we continue to deploy these technologies across industries, the blueprint for success is being rewritten in real time. Let’s keep this conversation going as we map out the future of business intelligence together.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Model Context Protocol is going stateless to make scaling simpler]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Model Context Protocol (MCP), the emerging standard for connecting AI models to external tools and enterprise data, is undergoing its biggest architectural overhaul yet.



The latest release candidate, scheduled for release on July 28, removes protocol-level sessions in favor of a stateless arch...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694388/it-security-nachrichten/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694388/it-security-nachrichten/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Model Context Protocol (<a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">MCP</a>), the emerging standard for connecting AI models to external tools and enterprise data, is undergoing its biggest architectural overhaul yet.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The latest <a href="https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/draft/changelog" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">release candidate</a>, scheduled for release on July 28, removes protocol-level sessions in favor of a stateless architecture, a change which industry experts say is intended to make MCP easier to deploy across standard cloud infrastructure as enterprises move AI pilots into production.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The session-based model made sense when MCP servers were local processes on a developer’s laptop. In production, it became an operational tax,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/muskan-bandta2004" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Muskan Bandta</a>, cloud associate at ZopDev.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When your infrastructure team asks whether MCP services can scale like other cloud applications, the answer used to be ‘not quite.’ With the move to a stateless architecture, the answer is now yes,” Bandta added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Earlier versions of the protocol maintained information about every client connection, meaning servers had to keep track of each session throughout an interaction. While that approach worked well for local development, it complicated deployments across multiple servers because requests often had to be routed back to the same machine, limiting scalability and making MCP a less natural fit for modern cloud architectures.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Under the new stateless design, every request contains the information needed for any available server to process it independently. Applications that need to maintain context across multiple requests can still do so, but developers must now manage that state explicitly rather than relying on the protocol itself,” she said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This transition to a stateless design goes beyond simplifying infrastructure by fundamentally changing how AI applications manage and share context across tools, according to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/znamit/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Amit Jena</a>, AI development manager at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of keeping application state hidden inside protocol sessions, the new design makes it explicit, allowing AI models to access, reason over, and pass that information between tools, giving developers greater control over how context is preserved and shared across tools, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It should also make AI workflows more portable, resilient, and easier to orchestrate across distributed environments, he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">MCP’s new features</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Other changes to MCP include the addition of a Multi Round-Trip Requests (MRTR) mechanism that changes how AI agents request additional information they need to complete a task.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of relying on a persistent connection between the client and server throughout the interaction, the new mechanism lets the server request additional input through a standard request-response exchange before continuing the task, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Routable transport headers, another addition, enable API gateways and other networking infrastructure to identify and route MCP requests without inspecting their contents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They reduce processing overhead, lower latency, and let enterprise teams enforce routing, rate-limiting and security policies more efficiently using existing API management infrastructure, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">MCP is also getting an updated authorization framework built around OAuth 2.1 and OpenID Connect; interactive MCP Apps; and deterministic caching of tool and resource listings to improve LLM prompt-cache hit rates, potentially saving on token costs.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Rebuilding the trust boundary</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The MCP release steering committee also decided to deprecate some legacy features, including Roots, Sampling, Logging, the older HTTP+SSE transport and Dynamic Client Registration, although these will continue to work in this version and any other released over the next year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The deprecation of Sampling is likely to have the biggest impact because it changes who is responsible for interacting with foundation models, said Jena.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Sampling let MCP servers invoke the <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335213/large-language-models-the-foundations-of-generative-ai.html" target="_blank">LLM</a> through the client, which meant the server had a callback path into the model without owning that connection. Deprecating it means rebuilding that trust boundary,” Jena said. “Your server now calls the model provider directly. That changes your network architecture, your auth model, and depending on how you’ve built cost attribution, your billing flow.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The year-long transition period will be enough for teams to audit their sampling dependencies now, said Jena: “The risk is that teams who haven’t implemented sampling themselves won’t know if a third-party MCP server they’re depending on uses it.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Updated MCP SDKs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To accompany the protocol update, there are updated <a href="https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MCP SDKs</a> for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253770/what-is-python-powerful-intuitive-programming.html" target="_blank">Python</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257305/what-is-typescript-strongly-typed-javascript.html" target="_blank">Typescript</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253031/whats-the-go-language-really-good-for-3.html">Go</a>, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4131649/the-best-new-features-of-c-14.html">C#</a>. These support both the old and new protocol versions, so new clients can continue communicating with older servers, while updated servers will also support older clients, reducing the risk of immediate disruptions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That backward compatibility should make the transition largely incremental, except for enterprises that built custom infrastructure around MCP’s earlier session-based architecture, Bandta said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Identifying and auditing those session dependencies may not be easy, Jena warned.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Session management complexity tends to be hidden across multiple layers — the gateway config, the deployment scripts, the monitoring dashboards. The code change is small; finding everywhere the assumption lives is what takes time,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4201254/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler.html">InfoWorld</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-16374 | Mozilla Firefox up to 140.12/152 Framework information disclosure (Nessus ID 329499)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in Mozilla Firefox up to 140.12/152. Impacted is an unknown function of the component Framework. This manipulation causes information disclosure.

The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2026-16374. It is possible to initiate the at...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694011/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-16374-mozilla-firefox-up-to-14012152-framework-information-disclosure-nessus-id-329499/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694011/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-16374-mozilla-firefox-up-to-14012152-framework-information-disclosure-nessus-id-329499/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 16:02:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">problematic</a> has been found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/mozilla:firefox">Mozilla Firefox up to 140.12/152</a>. Impacted is an unknown function of the component <em>Framework</em>. This manipulation causes information disclosure.

The identification of this vulnerability is <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-16374">CVE-2026-16374</a>. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.

It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Increasing app discovery and engagement on Google TV]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Paul Lammertsma, Developer Relations Engineer


  With over 300 million monthly active devices across Google TV and Android TV, it’s clear that the living room is a massive, distinct platform for apps to accelerate growth. Today, we’re excited to share Google TV features and developer t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693513/android-tipps/increasing-app-discovery-and-engagement-on-google-tv/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693513/android-tipps/increasing-app-discovery-and-engagement-on-google-tv/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQn4lINBGbNGjb1HQYUpv_Z0-JdltXyHegoQ-Ukl5l9K2ef4BSjX8c_yu0EWlnHSJnia8oXZYWvMtKxCP9t9PlJmI9GFIy34UDVfMBkEIaz3KJegu0j2TsivMZZPHg9tkIlsyK4NWd0vEq5v1MfQUay8zJ9-2QgLDLBlkqYVxnY7BaYa3QBTVRE3NKxxQ/s2048/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidText-StrapiMetacard-2048x1323.png">


<div><div class="separator"><i>Posted by Paul Lammertsma, Developer Relations Engineer</i></div></div><div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUUiNUfVyqYWETmRLzZjld7Nbk0wpVVqMlxvLssfmOzHDfOKdKI8vZkXau3HMhjkOKcXpeJ-K-JkXiKTLk9tG2XH-O5xPlj-AVfQBnelPGhzkOJwhmFeB3NqVssPj4Cnq9r1ZkAHh-44z-dq71bQOpjIz_8d1VF1m2nYs6azBGxNBrM2GOXm6uGJymbKk/s4209/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidText-Blogger-4209x1253.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1253" data-original-width="4209" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUUiNUfVyqYWETmRLzZjld7Nbk0wpVVqMlxvLssfmOzHDfOKdKI8vZkXau3HMhjkOKcXpeJ-K-JkXiKTLk9tG2XH-O5xPlj-AVfQBnelPGhzkOJwhmFeB3NqVssPj4Cnq9r1ZkAHh-44z-dq71bQOpjIz_8d1VF1m2nYs6azBGxNBrM2GOXm6uGJymbKk/s16000/GoogleForDevelopers-AndroidText-Blogger-4209x1253.png"></a></div><br><i><br></i><p dir="ltr"><br></p>

<p dir="ltr">
  With over 300 million monthly active devices across Google TV and Android TV, it’s clear that the living room is a massive, distinct platform for apps to accelerate growth. Today, we’re excited to share Google TV features and developer tools designed to increase the discoverability of your content and prepare your app for future TV experiences.
</p>

<h2 dir="ltr">Drive discovery and engagement with Gemini</h2>

<p dir="ltr">
  Last year, we brought our AI voice assistant, <a href="https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/platforms/google-tv/gemini-google-tv/">Gemini</a>, to our platform, so that people can easily find what to watch, learn something new on the big screen, and get everyday tasks done with just their voice.
</p>

<p dir="ltr">
  Since launch, we’ve made <a href="https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/platforms/google-tv/new-gemini-features-march-2026/">improvements</a> to how Gemini provides tailored responses to questions. Gemini shares a mix of visuals, videos, and text to help users find what they need, when they need it. For our streaming partners, Gemini is a helpful discovery engine—pulling from your app's metadata to surface your relevant content to viewers.
</p>

<div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhN7u9KDZ7L8CIw5cVB_qdWf6PRcm86N8RsrlWPdEYsfwchPZwFBpMaajSqkPwXXAoBP0_v0GpQsWp4_gF_SsBC0DuZlN0qVystQ3fWmHs1qU6dKclljJaea-Phak7qEoGFiu_i3-dj0l7WmA7Tm7T2v8kERsfhKp6BCFs-7y7eSdxVWmFkpIzXYsceaJM/w640-h360/GTV%20Gemini%20-%20GOAT%20overview%20%5B10.8%20MB%5D.gif"></div>

<h2 dir="ltr">Declare support for pointing modality</h2>

<p dir="ltr">
  The TV experience that we once knew is changing. Gemini is changing the way we discover and stream content with voice, but how we use the remote is evolving, too.
</p>

<div class="separator"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi5hNXf8y8wwFxJAgZ0N4QwO5v6QUe7vn4Qy70-ndmo2iTye1qdhKP5WxKPJVwoPi0qdadX25BUJzxtLQZVAHXASOibVD0y3Xd_gFuOzp5GOIBwtXy_2jFa4lsTi4r1k6OzkTe5HyJGkOK-fNspRoo54mEA5IB8K4f0fVZ9UpgTWlringYByYxw3Bn_X1c/w640-h360/GTV%20Pointer%20Remote%20Demo_SHELL.gif"></div>

<p dir="ltr">
  Pointer remotes bring motion-controlled input to the big screen, unlocking faster user navigation across the Google TV Home page and within content-heavy apps. To ensure your app is ready for this shift and provides a great experience for all users, now is the time to start thinking about pointing input. Here’s how to get started:
</p>

<h4><span>1. Adapt your TV app UI Library</span></h4>
<p dir="ltr">
  You’ll need support for hover states, scrollable containers, and cursor clicks to enable pointer remote interactions for your app on Google TV. While implementation varies by UI stack, Jetpack Compose streamlines this transition, as most core components handle these multi-modal interactions natively out of the box.
</p>

<ol type="a">
  <li><strong>Hover state:</strong> Every focusable element on your screen (buttons, movie posters, setting toggles) needs a clear visual feedback mechanism for a hover state. This is often subtler than a focus state but critical for feedback.</li>
  <li><strong>Scrollable containers:</strong> Pointer remotes will also have a small circular touchpad for scrolling. Users can use this touchpad to scroll up or down, or left or right in your app. Your app will need to respond to touch events to scroll.</li>
  <li><strong>Cursor clicks:</strong> Many TV apps today expect a simple D-pad OKAY button “click.” With a pointer remote, a user may “click” on an element that’s not the D-pad focus state, but is instead from a hovered state (similar to a mouse click).</li>
</ol>

<h4><span>2. Test pointing interactions with a mouse today</span></h4>
<p dir="ltr">
  To see how your app handles hover, scroll, and clicks, simply connect a bluetooth mouse or wired mouse to your Google TV. Keep in mind that a mouse has more precise control, since users are closer to the screen and typically rest the mouse in a stable position. Pointer remotes can often be less precise, since users are sometimes 10 feet away from the screen, making rough gestures with the remote from their couch. As a TV designer or developer, you can mitigate this lack of input precision by having larger hover targets for elements.
</p>

<h4><span>3. Declare TV app support for pointer remotes on Google Play</span></h4>
<p dir="ltr">
  Finally, tell Google Play that your TV app is designed to work with a pointer. This ensures that users with pointer remotes will be able to easily find, install, and interact with your app.
</p>

<p dir="ltr">
  Within your AndroidManifest.xml, declare the meta-data tag, <span>android.software.leanback.</span><span>supports_touch</span>. This tag informs the platform that your TV app “spatially supports touch,” since pointer remotes simulate touch events from a distance.
</p>

<p dir="ltr"><strong><em>AndroidManifest.xml</em></strong></p>

<pre>&lt;manifest ...&gt;
    &lt;!-- Signal whether the app is adaptive or built just for TV --&gt;
    &lt;uses-feature android:name="android.software.leanback" android:required="true|false" /&gt;

    &lt;!-- Ensure the app can be installed on conventional TVs --&gt;
    &lt;uses-feature android:name="android.hardware.touchscreen" android:required="false" /&gt;

    &lt;!-- Signal whether the app supports pointer remotes --&gt;
    &lt;meta-data android:name="android.software.leanback.supports_touch" android:value="true|false"/&gt;

    &lt;application ...&gt;
        ...
    &lt;/application&gt;
&lt;/manifest&gt;
</pre>

<p dir="ltr"><strong>Tips:</strong></p><ul>
  <li>The <span>android.<strong>software</strong>.<strong>leanback</strong></span> feature declaration indicates that your app supports D-pad navigation and is intended for distribution only on TV devices via Google Play.</li>
  <li>The new software attribute of <span>android.software.leanback.</span><span>supports_touch</span> declares that in addition to D-pad, you have ensured that your TV app works well for pointer/cursor experiences via mouse (of today) and pointer remotes (of future).</li>
  <li>If you haven't already, now is the time to adopt <a href="https://developer.android.com/compose">Jetpack Compose</a>. Hover, scroll, and clicks are common input modalities that are supported on various form factors, and building your app with an adaptive UI framework enables code reusability and reduced maintenance.</li>
</ul>

<h2 dir="ltr">Onboard the Engage SDK</h2>
<p dir="ltr">
  The Engage SDK, formerly known as the Video Discovery API, optimizes Resumption, Entitlements, and Recommendations across all Google TV form factors to boost app discovery and engagement.
</p>

<ul>
  <li><strong>Resumption:</strong> Partners can easily display a user's paused video within the 'Continue Watching' row from the Home page.</li>
  <li><strong>Entitlements:</strong> The Engage SDK streamlines entitlement management, which matches app content to user eligibility. Users appreciate this because they can enjoy personalized recommendations without needing to manually update all their subscription details. This allows partners to connect with users across multiple discovery points on Google TV.</li>
  <li><strong>Recommendations:</strong> The Engage SDK even highlights personalized recommendations based on content that users watched inside apps.</li>
</ul>

<p dir="ltr">
  It’s a great time to start onboarding the Engage SDK now, since the legacy Watch Next API, which has been powering your continue watching 1.0 experience, will lose support in the 2nd half of 2027. To get started, head to <a href="https://goo.gle/engage-tv">goo.gle/engage-tv</a> to learn more.
</p>

<p dir="ltr">
  We're excited to see how our latest Gemini experience and developer tools will optimize your discovery and drive user engagement on our platform.
</p>Explore this announcement and all Google I/O 2026 updates on <a href="https://io.google/2026/?utm_source=blogpost&amp;utm_medium=pr&amp;utm_campaign=devblogs&amp;utm_content=">io.google</a>.</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Top AI on Android updates for building intelligent experiences from Google I/O ‘26]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Jingyu Shi, Staff Developer Relations EngineerAt Google I/O 2026, we introduced Android’s shift from an operating system to an intelligence system. We also demonstrated how you can build intelligent experiences natively with the system and bring the power of Google’s AI into your apps. ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693510/android-tipps/top-ai-on-android-updates-for-building-intelligent-experiences-from-google-io-26/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693510/android-tipps/top-ai-on-android-updates-for-building-intelligent-experiences-from-google-io-26/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjqtr_NVZaXiVnywBK8bKIamZw4oM3DFopMeWXl_DsHJktlRpmuCkOCQEkc85z-xJ8id7DT8ggl6OopYCndxxYb8kA2LIttV3DlL1Mzmt5OffK_Lyq1q_mxg4RdUjQ23rOyNY5N3wopBtBODH-HQsPRqBc8cS8Kw0Azhz14Jn8EjEdKQ3znXGLRVUpM_-g/s4097/Blog_Meta@2x.png">



<i>Posted by Jingyu Shi, Staff Developer Relations Engineer</i><div><i><br></i><div><name content="IMG" twitter:image=""><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgnWqvWK7oNvOOsTjwsLlEtnmvh7HwduYCahIBBtGUCUZQmQ0pfEWvk3hH0xlrnhyi5oZzY_ZU22jLYl-IA00DVLLi0No_oYWTXYZSk95GLU5P-IirCS74fx2MAUV5mKO_p_6SvFiiNmFnuUoet0QHyMjc8TeLE4Ie7HE3wcFfNeFzkN66IDCkNx1QYQiI/s8419/BLOG%20HERO_BLOGGER@2x.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="2507" data-original-width="8419" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgnWqvWK7oNvOOsTjwsLlEtnmvh7HwduYCahIBBtGUCUZQmQ0pfEWvk3hH0xlrnhyi5oZzY_ZU22jLYl-IA00DVLLi0No_oYWTXYZSk95GLU5P-IirCS74fx2MAUV5mKO_p_6SvFiiNmFnuUoet0QHyMjc8TeLE4Ie7HE3wcFfNeFzkN66IDCkNx1QYQiI/s16000/BLOG%20HERO_BLOGGER@2x.png"></a></div><br><i><br></i><p></p><p><i></i></p><br></name><div>At Google I/O 2026, we introduced Android’s shift from an operating system to an intelligence system. We also demonstrated how you can build intelligent experiences natively with the system and bring the power of Google’s AI into your apps. If you missed these updates, check out our quick recap video here: </div><div><div><name content="IMG" twitter:image=""><br><div class="separator">
<div class="separator">
  
  
</div>
  <br></div></name><h4><name content="IMG" twitter:image=""><b><span>1. Putting your apps at the center of the intelligence system</span></b></name></h4><name content="IMG" twitter:image=""><div>The Android OS already enables agents like <a href="https://www.android.com/gemini-intelligence/?utm_source=blog.google&amp;utm_medium=owned&amp;utm_campaign=next">Gemini</a> to complete task automation, where it can navigate an app on the users behalf. </div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://developer.android.com/ai/appfunctions">AppFunctions</a> (Android MCP) provides you with more control over how your app integrates with the intelligence system. This new platform API and Jetpack library are currently available in experimental preview. </div><p></p><ul><li><name content="IMG" twitter:image=""><b>Android MCP:</b> AppFunctions allows your application to act as an on-device Model Context Protocol (MCP) server. It means you seamlessly share your app's tools, services and data to the system and agents.</name></li></ul><p></p><p></p><ul><li><name content="IMG" twitter:image=""><b>Streamlined Development: </b>You can leverage the new <a href="https://github.com/android/skills/tree/main/device-ai/appfunctions">skill</a> to easily generate AppFunctions within your codebase.  </name></li></ul><p></p><p></p><ul><li><name content="IMG" twitter:image=""><b>Exploration and Testing:</b> We’ve released a new <a href="https://github.com/android/appfunctions/releases">test agent</a> that allows you to experiment and debug your AppFunctions in a simulated agent environment. </name></li></ul><span><div align="center" dir="ltr"><table><colgroup><col></colgroup><tbody><tr><td><div><span face='"Google Sans Text", sans-serif'>Early Access Program</span><span face='"Google Sans Text", sans-serif'>: Want to be among the first apps to deploy app functions in production? </span><a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScEoIsgzE-LbgRrYcQMc-Lit_5VlKRA0iWw7Pvg1brIc8wXAw/viewform"><span face='"Google Sans Text", sans-serif'>Join</span></a><span face='"Google Sans Text", sans-serif'> our early access program today!</span></div></td></tr></tbody></table></div></span></name></div><div><br></div><div>To see it in action, check out the live demo showcased during the <i>What’s New</i> in Android presentation.</div><div><br></div><div class="separator">
<div class="separator">
  
  
</div>
  <div><div><span><br></span></div><h4><b> <span>2. On-Device Power with Gemini Nano 4 Preview</span></b></h4><br><div>Last month, we launched <a href="https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/04/gemma-4-new-standard-for-local-agentic-intelligence.html">Gemma 4</a>, our state-of-the-art open models. You can already preview and prototype with the next generation of Gemini Nano (Nano 4) models with the <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/aicore-dev-preview">AIcore developer preview</a>. To make productionizing with Gemini Nano more reliable and performant, we are adding a few new features in <b>ML Kit GenAI APIs</b>: </div><br><p></p><p></p><ul><li><b>Prototype to Production: </b>Transition from prototyping in the AICore Developer Preview to building production-ready apps using the ML Kit GenAI <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/prompt/android/get-started">Prompt API</a> to leverage Gemini Nano 4 that’s launching in flagship devices later this year.</li></ul><p></p><p></p><p></p><ul><li><b>Structured Output:</b> The upcoming Structured Output API will allow you to define object classes to be returned as outputs from Prompt API, ensuring reliable outputs in productionizing your intelligent features. </li></ul><p></p><p></p><ul><li><b><a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/prompt/android/prefix-caching">Prefix Caching</a>:</b> It optimizes your on-device inference performance with the prompt API. The new Prefix caching reduces inference time by storing and reusing the intermediate LLM state of processing a shared and recurring part of the prompt.</li></ul><p></p><div><b><br></b></div><div>For highly customized or niche use cases, you can also use LiteRT-LM to <a href="https://youtu.be/boy-UjB8hpA?si=MCPddRD7eblz8ICr">bring your own</a> fine-tuned small language model to Android.</div></div><br><div class="separator">
<div class="separator">
  
  
</div>
</div><div class="separator"><br></div><div class="separator"><br></div><b><div><b><span>3. Hybrid Inference &amp; Agents</span></b></div></b><div><div><br></div><div>To help you build more advanced AI features like hybrid inference and explore building in-app agents, we’ve released new APIs, framework and guidances:</div><p></p><p></p><ul><li><b><a href="https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/04/Hybrid-inference-and-new-AI-models-are-coming-to-Android.html">Firebase AI Logic Hybrid Inference</a>: </b>This new API provides the simple routing capability between on-device models and powerful cloud infrastructure. You can set explicit orchestration modes, such as <code>PREFER_ON_DEVICE</code>, <code>PREFER_CLOUD</code>, <code>ONLY_ON_DEVICE</code>, or <code>ONLY_CLOUD</code>, based on your need.</li></ul><p></p><p></p><p></p><ul><li><b>A2UI Jetpack Compose Renderer:</b> The new A2UI library allows your agents to "speak UI". With the upcoming Jetpack Compose Renderer, you can automatically render these A2UI messages as native UI components.</li></ul><p></p><p></p><ul><li><b><a href="https://developers.googleblog.com/adk-kotlin-android-building-ai-agents/">ADK for Android</a>:</b> The first version of ADK for Android is available for experimentation. It allows you to build multi-agent workflows across both on-device and Cloud models while managing orchestration, context handling and sessions between agents.</li></ul><div><br></div><div>From building with on-device models, exploring hybrid inference to building agents, you can see them in action in this talk: </div></div><div> <br><p></p><div class="separator">
<div class="separator">
  
  
</div>
  </div><div class="separator"><br></div><div class="separator"><h3>Start Building Today</h3><div class="separator"><div class="separator"><div class="separator">Whether you are experimenting with AppFunctions to prepare for the intelligence system, or looking to bring the power of Google’s AI within your own app, we’ve got you covered. Dive deeper into the code snippets, samples and comprehensive developer guides on the Android AI <a href="https://developer.android.com/ai">hub</a>. For the full breakdown of what’s new, check out the official <b>AI on Android at Google I/O 2026</b> <a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLWz5rJ2EKKc-GL3584TkxUyoPfzPkB1mV">playlist</a>.</div><div class="separator"><br></div><div class="separator">We are excited to see what you build! </div><div><br></div></div><div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Building Premium Android Experiences at Google I/O ‘26]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Ataul Munim, Android Developer Relations Engineer



  
    
  



  A truly differentiated Android experience is about delivering premium delight wherever your users are. At Google I/O ‘26, we showcased how the latest advancements in the Android ecosystem can help you elevate your app'...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693509/android-tipps/building-premium-android-experiences-at-google-io-26/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693509/android-tipps/building-premium-android-experiences-at-google-io-26/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhKGsnLX5Gwc9xouq7Q32ltvbL7xW_d4jnCXtoEFr7emB2wzqlZEuXM8FXe22ZPSguMX-nOrxAPYja6AYBZWxF-lKJYxw09D3f2aMyjxsSi5jinnDBjJPOIFDyqVhuJC2SjOqKHLAmstGg1nhyphenhyphenJGYfp3m71TPL_i3xFAUm6PKp3uo5WVytjoRwTIoNmMVQ/s4097/MM_Differentiated%20Experiences_Meta.png">

<div>
  <div class="separator"><em>Posted by Ataul Munim, Android Developer Relations Engineer</em></div>
</div>

<div class="separator">
  <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjimB7lZHnz1Nqt-CPhoIzMWWup9qcJd2B3wzfmG2kX-4HwtnEfrSrp9J2e7aINQrh8SaPd_mP7DvY6nQiP_K2nEju5nOCwbTan-oVeZ8rmoW1R5CvErSIFXPeuIXS7LsB8TnZZee462-ygL5IbOZ2m_C3rAcXEiv08HrPjPrku0oB-T70JyXM6lmgxzmg/s4209/MM_Differentiated-Experiences_Blog%20(1).png">
    <img border="0" data-original-height="1253" data-original-width="4209" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjimB7lZHnz1Nqt-CPhoIzMWWup9qcJd2B3wzfmG2kX-4HwtnEfrSrp9J2e7aINQrh8SaPd_mP7DvY6nQiP_K2nEju5nOCwbTan-oVeZ8rmoW1R5CvErSIFXPeuIXS7LsB8TnZZee462-ygL5IbOZ2m_C3rAcXEiv08HrPjPrku0oB-T70JyXM6lmgxzmg/s16000/MM_Differentiated-Experiences_Blog%20(1).png">
  </a>
</div>

<div class="separator">
  A truly differentiated Android experience is about delivering premium delight wherever your users are. At Google I/O ‘26, we showcased how the latest advancements in the Android ecosystem can help you elevate your app's quality while maximizing development efficiency.
</div>

<div>
  <p>To help you build apps that stand out, we're diving into the key tools and libraries designed to optimize your core performance, extend the surfaces of your app to other devices, and streamline how your app handles high-quality media. </p>
  <p>Here is a recap of the essential updates and sessions you need to know to deliver a next-level experience across form factors!</p>
</div>

<div class="separator">
  
</div>

<h3>Maximize app performance and ROI with the R8 Configuration Analyzer</h3>
<p>A premium experience is only as good as its foundation, and a performant foundation is what allows your app to scale across the Android ecosystem. This is especially true with the release of Android 17, which introduces conservative, device RAM-based app memory limits to target extreme memory leaks and outliers before they cause system-wide instability. To stay below these new system thresholds and prevent your app from being terminated, having a lean footprint is no longer optional: it’s a critical requirement.</p>
<p>This year, we’re making it easier to build highly optimized, fast apps by introducing the <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/app-optimization/r8-configuration-analyzer" target="_blank">R8 Configuration Analyzer</a> in Android Studio. R8 is your most powerful tool for improving app performance, but its effectiveness is often limited by overly broad "keep rules" that prevent the compiler from stripping away unused code. The new Configuration Analyzer provides optimization, obfuscation, and shrinking scores, allowing you to identify specific rules that are preventing the benefits of R8 optimization.</p>
<p>By optimizing their R8 configurations, developers at Monzo achieved a 30% improvement in cold starts and a 35% reduction in ANRs. Smaller, faster code isn't just about efficiency; it's about ensuring your app has the memory headroom to deliver delight on every form factor, from the phone to the car.</p>

<div class="separator">
  
</div>

<h3>Extend your reach with a unified approach to Widgets on Phones, Watches and Cars</h3>
<p>User interaction is shifting toward quick, glanceable moments—short bursts of information that keep users connected without needing to open the full app. To help you increase the reach of your app content, we are unifying the development experience across the Android ecosystem with Jetpack Glance. By using a consistent, Compose-based model, you can elevate the content most important to your users straight to the phone’s home screen, Wear Widgets (previously Tiles!), and cars with a familiar workflow.</p>
<p>In order to help users engage with your content and features, even outside your app, we are making widgets more expressive and adaptive with RemoteCompose. On Wear OS, RemoteCompose allows you to use the Compose tools you’re already comfortable with to define UI logic that renders natively on remote surfaces, ensuring that your glanceable experiences remain highly performant and responsive even on resource-constrained hardware. On mobile and cars, RemoteCompose is used as a new framework giving Widgets new expressive capabilities.</p>
<p>You can use Jetpack Glance (together with RemoteCompose on Wear) to deliver a cohesive user journey. Whether it’s viewing flight status on the car dashboard, checking a gate change on a watch, or managing a boarding pass from a phone widget, this shared approach maximizes your app’s presence while keeping your development effort focused and efficient.</p>

<div class="separator">
  
</div>

<div>
  <h3>Supercharge your media pipeline with a complete, production-ready toolkit</h3>
  <div>Android has become a world-class home for the entire media lifecycle, and we are simplifying the journey from the first capture to the final playback. By leveraging Jetpack CameraX and Media3, you can build professional-grade experiences that feel native across the entire ecosystem. </div>
  <p>It starts with high-fidelity capture using the CameraXViewfinder Composable, which ensures your preview remains perfectly scaled and responsive on any form factor, including foldables and tablets. Use this to build adaptive capture experiences like a picture-in-picture view for multi-tasking, or that take advantage of modern features like high-frame-rate or slow-motion capture with CameraX v1.5.<br></p>
  <p>The new Media3 AI Effects library will provide a unified interface for premium features like Image &amp; Video Enhance, Magic Eraser, and Studio Sound. This allows you to focus on the creative intent while Media3 handles the heavy lifting of choosing the most efficient and reliable path for the device. Then, use the latest improvements in multi-asset editing with Media3 Transformer to composite your edited videos together!</p>
  <p>Complete the pipeline with tools designed for professional-grade export and viewing, including:</p>
  <ul>
    <li>CodecDB, which offers data-driven encoding recommendations tailored to specific chipsets, ensuring your exported videos maintain high visual quality with minimal noise or blurriness</li>
    <li>Scrubbing Mode in ExoPlayer to provide the buttery-smooth seeking experience users expect from premium media apps</li>
    <li>Enhanced Cast support with the new CastPlayer API in Media3</li>
  </ul>
  <p>By unifying these technical pillars, you can build a cohesive, high-performance media journey that delivers both delight for your users and high ROI for your development team.</p>
</div>

<div class="separator">
  
</div>

<p>For more details, check out the <i>premium</i> Android experience <a href="https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLWz5rJ2EKKc8lSdmWQ_fSpV9yEGRvEL6S&amp;si=H6-8-AbtEyTqSxeY" target="_blank">YouTube playlist</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Prioritizing Memory Efficiency: Essential Steps for Android 17]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Alice Yuan, Developer Relations Engineer, Ajesh Pai, Developer Relations Engineer, and Fung Lam, Developer Relations Engineer



    
        
    



    While app performance is often equated with a smooth UI and fast start times, memory serves as the silent foundation upon which thes...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693508/android-tipps/prioritizing-memory-efficiency-essential-steps-for-android-17/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693508/android-tipps/prioritizing-memory-efficiency-essential-steps-for-android-17/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCIAoJpwUITPS5C3_eTksMsaslwqPk7SIEQHkwEkGv8572ccdIKcdv6kNC1BOSJPAZTgX5m3liMMv4zdK58e5dWRhUfo39uas23LuhEWf13TFnDTdw-Z5mWn4JarSnC8yCET8Sw15zSF-jQ5zwALriacGK6IjAGxNg61sFtSxzndjvqXxZtJt4qxuzd9A/s2048/Engineering-Memory-Blog-Meta-3.png">

<div class="separator">
    <em>Posted by Alice Yuan, Developer Relations Engineer, Ajesh Pai, Developer Relations Engineer, and Fung Lam, Developer Relations Engineer</em>
</div>

<div class="separator">
    <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhanYZz4QpaDuwP7y_ZVGCUh6TpdQxS65pBcYr-Qkawd9YFS587tnIUPnqDROlxIXzgdz6GGxluR3LzH8ZabQPWz382FDEOEDpK3GxUFywn0A54JXFtUwDPaeI0JnFhEl-6NRrcjKeFPMLozNQv_An9OcWEUA-rmXfOhWvIKRrptdblGEZHERD0P-ynFcc/s4209/Engineering-Memory-Blog-3.png">
        <img border="0" data-original-height="1253" data-original-width="4209" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhanYZz4QpaDuwP7y_ZVGCUh6TpdQxS65pBcYr-Qkawd9YFS587tnIUPnqDROlxIXzgdz6GGxluR3LzH8ZabQPWz382FDEOEDpK3GxUFywn0A54JXFtUwDPaeI0JnFhEl-6NRrcjKeFPMLozNQv_An9OcWEUA-rmXfOhWvIKRrptdblGEZHERD0P-ynFcc/s16000/Engineering-Memory-Blog-3.png">
    </a>
</div>

<p>
    While app performance is often equated with a smooth UI and fast start times, memory serves as the silent foundation upon which these visible metrics are built. It's no secret that we're seeing a shift where device memory is more important than ever. Not only have we made strides in Android memory optimizations with Android 17, we're providing the tooling and API support to help you stay ahead of stricter memory requirements later this year.
</p>

<p>
    To ensure device stability, starting in Android 17, the system will begin enforcing app memory limits based on the device's total RAM. If an app exceeds those limits, Android will kill the process with no associated stack trace.
</p>

<div>
    Beyond these forced terminations, unoptimized memory usage inevitably degrades the user experience. When the app approaches heap memory limits, it triggers frequent garbage collection—leading to noticeable UI stutters. Furthermore, when a device runs out of available memory, the system scrambles to reclaim pages, causing CPU strain, UI latency, and battery drain. If the memory shortage is too severe, it can cause Low Memory Killer (LMK) events that abruptly terminate background processes and force apps to have slow cold starts and lose user state.
</div>

<div>
    <p>To build highly performant apps and avoid these forced terminations, we recommend that you adopt the following memory optimization strategies:</p>
    <ol>
        <li><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/06/prioritizing-memory-efficiency-steps-for-android-17.html#Maximize">Maximize bytecode optimization with R8</a></li>
        <li><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/06/prioritizing-memory-efficiency-steps-for-android-17.html#Optimize">Optimize image loading</a></li>
        <li><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/06/prioritizing-memory-efficiency-steps-for-android-17.html#Detect">Detect and fix memory leaks with Android Studio</a></li>
        <li><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/06/prioritizing-memory-efficiency-steps-for-android-17.html#Trim">Trim memory when app leaves visible state</a></li>
        <li><a href="http://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/06/prioritizing-memory-efficiency-steps-for-android-17.html#Advanced">Advanced memory observability with ProfilingManager</a></li>
    </ol>
</div>
<br>
<div>
    <div class="separator">
        
    </div>
    <div>
        <em>A condensed version of this blog post is also available in video format, go check it out!</em>
    </div>
    
    <h3>Understanding Android 17 app memory limits</h3>
    <p>App memory limits are being introduced in Android 17 to prevent "one bad actor" from destroying the multitasking experience and stability of the user’s entire device.</p>
    <p>Here is a breakdown of the reasons driving this architectural change:</p>
    
    <div>
        <ul>
            <li><b>Preventing cascading kills:</b> When an app becomes bloated or leaks memory while holding a privileged state (e.g. it’s running a Foreground Service), it is initially shielded from the system's Low Memory Killer (LMK). As this single app grows unchecked and hoards RAM, the LMK is forced to compensate by killing off dozens of smaller, well-behaved cached apps and background jobs to reclaim space for the memory hog.</li>
            <li><b>Preserving multitasking and user state:</b> When the system is forced to purge cached apps to accommodate a single leaking process, the multitasking experience is severely degraded. Users returning to prior cached applications encounter sluggish cold starts instead of near-instant warm resumes. This inefficiency generates more CPU strain and accelerates battery depletion. It can also destroy the user’s context in recently used apps, such as scroll positions, navigation stacks, and in-game progress.</li>
        </ul>
        
        <div>
            <p>To determine if your app session was impacted by these constraints in the field, you can call <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/ApplicationExitInfo#getDescription%28%29" target="_blank">getDescription()</a> within <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/ApplicationExitInfo" target="_blank">ApplicationExitInfo</a>. If the system applied a limit, the exit reason is reported as <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/app/ApplicationExitInfo#REASON_OTHER" target="_blank">REASON_OTHER</a> and the description string will contain "MemoryLimiter:AnonSwap". You can also leverage <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/tracing/profiling-manager/trigger-based-capture" target="_blank">trigger-based profiling</a> using <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/features#anomaly-profiling-trigger" target="_blank">TRIGGER_TYPE_ANOMALY</a> to automatically capture heap dumps when the memory limit is reached. Furthermore, Android is actively working to surface more in-field memory metrics to developers within the Google Play Console.</p>
            <p>We have also expanded our <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-all#app-memory-limits" target="_blank">memory limits documentation</a> to include local debugging commands, allowing you to simulate memory constraints in your local environment and validate your application's behavior under any memory limit enforcement. </p>
        </div>
    </div>
</div>

<div>
    <h3>Maximize bytecode optimization with R8</h3>
    <p>A highly effective way to reduce your app's memory footprint is to enable the R8 optimizer. By shrinking classes, methods, and fields into shorter names and stripping out unused code and resources, R8 significantly reduces your app's memory footprint by minimizing the amount of resident code required during execution. </p>
    <p>R8 minimizes resident code, shrinking the memory footprint and lowering LMK termination risk. This results in more frequent warm starts over slow cold starts. Additionally, streamlined bytecode reduces main-thread CPU overhead, directly cutting ANR rates for a more fluid user experience. For example, the digital bank <a href="https://developer.android.com/blog/posts/monzo-boosts-performance-metrics-by-up-to-35-with-a-simple-r8-update" target="_blank">Monzo</a> enabled full R8 optimization and saw a 35% reduction in their ANR rate, a 30% improvement in cold start rate, and a 9% reduction in overall app size.</p>
</div>

<div class="separator">
    <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhB61hi7-o6RYAHNOoIg1egyi6iU3iGtLbwfOb-s6r_PadBV2LZzvYtcdD00iwcApjnqmwOssOLFSHv8MG_es8WJWaJUPaO6rMY4ZcINSBFROo_1Di3LVMvIEhPldpzQsUOxV1Z7VfPwvej2fa9a7yCNwBdGOGw2LMLtPrCST6InlqF1xHds30rS76C9no/s2500/pic1-IO26_113_TSV-monzo-casestudy.jpg">
        <img border="0" data-original-height="1406" data-original-width="2500" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhB61hi7-o6RYAHNOoIg1egyi6iU3iGtLbwfOb-s6r_PadBV2LZzvYtcdD00iwcApjnqmwOssOLFSHv8MG_es8WJWaJUPaO6rMY4ZcINSBFROo_1Di3LVMvIEhPldpzQsUOxV1Z7VfPwvej2fa9a7yCNwBdGOGw2LMLtPrCST6InlqF1xHds30rS76C9no/s16000/pic1-IO26_113_TSV-monzo-casestudy.jpg">
    </a>
</div>
<div>
    <i>The digital bank <a href="https://developer.android.com/blog/posts/monzo-boosts-performance-metrics-by-up-to-35-with-a-simple-r8-update" target="_blank">Monzo</a> enabled full R8 optimization and boosted performance metrics by up to 35%.</i>
</div>

<div>
    <p>To properly configure R8 in your <code>build.gradle</code> file:</p>
    <ul>
        <li>Set <code>isShrinkResources = true</code> and <code>isMinifyEnabled = true</code>.</li>
        <li>Use <code>proguard-android-optimize.txt</code> instead of the legacy <code>proguard-android.txt</code>, which actually prevents optimizations and is no longer supported in Android Gradle Plugin 9.</li>
        <li>Remove <code>android.enableR8.fullMode = false</code> from your <code>gradle.properties</code>.</li>
    </ul>
    
    <p>
        If you are using reflection in your code base, then add <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/app-optimization/keep-rules-overview#where-to-add-rules" target="_blank">Keep rules</a> to prevent R8 from optimizing those parts of the code. Make sure to scope the keep rules narrowly to get the maximum optimization.
    </p>
    <p>To get the maximum optimization, make sure to follow these best practices in your keep rule file.</p>
    
    <ul>
        <li>Remove global options like <code>-dontoptimize</code>, <code>-dontshrink</code>, and <code>-dontobfuscate</code> that prevent R8 from optimizing the entire codebase </li>
        <li>Remove keep rules that prevent optimizing Android components like Activity, Services, Views or Broadcast receivers.</li>
        <li>Refine the broad package wide keep rules to target only specific classes or methods.</li>
    </ul>
    
    <p>To see more best practices, view our <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/app-optimization/keep-rules-best-practices" target="_blank">keep rules documentation</a>.</p>
    
    <h3>Library Developer R8 Best Practices</h3>
    <p>If you are a library developer, strictly place the rules your consumers need into your <code>consumer-rules</code> file, and keep your library's internal protection rules in your <code>proguard-rules.pro</code> file. For more information on how to optimize libraries, see <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/app-optimization/library-optimization" target="_blank">Optimization for library authors</a>.</p>
    
    <h3>R8 Configuration Analyzer</h3>
    <p>To audit your R8 optimization, use the <b><a href="http://developer.android.com/r8-analyzer" target="_blank">Configuration Analyzer</a></b>. Configuration analyzer shows the current state of optimization with Obfuscation, Optimization, and Shrinking scores. With configuration analyzer, you can also understand how many classes, methods or fields are prevented from optimization by each keep rule. Refine these broad package wide keep rules to unlock the maximum optimization.</p>
    <p>Using configuration analyzer, you can also identify keep rules that are subsuming other keep rules, redundant keep rules and unused keep rules.</p>
</div>

<div class="separator">
    <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEib0dTmk8w7EYsDiV0Ufd8CAnpWz36-ZDC_gCGFkS_0CGz0axCxOy3RBxuaOoUbR4kzaeFBXryfSR2rkxRsmTXNrPtuJw8n1DTiZiKDqHjv3AaEXteE9TKV3QxYtwCztvY-8a0GpBlOZhVV1p0ftgdxeiKGGnO3dLu_IOt-TB_7j-ZnbR2jSr_CNYzh-bc/s2048/pic2-r8-config-analyzer.png">
        <img border="0" data-original-height="1156" data-original-width="2048" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEib0dTmk8w7EYsDiV0Ufd8CAnpWz36-ZDC_gCGFkS_0CGz0axCxOy3RBxuaOoUbR4kzaeFBXryfSR2rkxRsmTXNrPtuJw8n1DTiZiKDqHjv3AaEXteE9TKV3QxYtwCztvY-8a0GpBlOZhVV1p0ftgdxeiKGGnO3dLu_IOt-TB_7j-ZnbR2jSr_CNYzh-bc/s16000/pic2-r8-config-analyzer.png">
    </a>
</div>
<div>
    <i>The Configuration Analyzer shows the current state of optimization with Obfuscation, Optimization, and Shrinking scores.</i>
</div>

<div>
    <h4><span>R8 Agent Skill </span></h4>
    <p>You can also leverage the <b><a href="https://github.com/android/skills/tree/main/performance/r8-analyzer" target="_blank">R8 Agent Skill</a></b> with Android Studio agent or other AI tools to resolve misconfigurations and refine your rules resulting in improved app performance. <i>(Insights from AI-driven skills will require technical verification)</i></p>
</div>

<h3>Optimize image loading</h3>
<div>
    <p>Bitmaps are usually the largest common objects residing in your app's memory. They represent the final stage of the image loading process where compressed files, like JPEGs or PNGs, are decoded into raw pixel data for display. This means a tiny 100KB compressed image can balloon into several megabytes of RAM because memory consumption is determined by the image's pixel dimensions and color depth. Since bitmap operations are frequently on the critical path to drawing frames, unoptimized images cause severe memory bloat and UI jank.</p>
    <p>Google recommends leveraging image loading libraries <b><a href="https://github.com/coil-kt/coil" target="_blank">Coil</a></b> for Kotlin-first projects, particularly when developing with Jetpack Compose and <b><a href="https://github.com/bumptech/glide" target="_blank">Glide</a></b> for Java-based applications.</p>
    
    <h4><span>Adopt these five best practices</span></h4>
    <ol>
        <li><b>Downsample images:</b> If you’re loading bitmaps manually, avoid loading a massive image into a tiny thumbnail view; use <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/graphics/load-bitmap" target="_blank">inSampleSize</a> to load a smaller version. Glide and Coil downsamples images by default and you can configure this downsample strategy using <a href="https://bumptech.github.io/glide/javadocs/470/com/bumptech/glide/load/resource/bitmap/DownsampleStrategy.html" target="_blank">DownsampleStrategy</a> and <a href="https://coil-kt.github.io/coil/image_loaders/" target="_blank">ImageLoader</a> respectively.</li>
        <li><b>Cropping:</b> Avoid embedding padding directly into an image file for letterboxing purposes (e.g., creating a transparent border to expand an image dimensions). Rather than baking in these borders, utilize <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/graphics/drawable/InsetDrawable" target="_blank">InsetDrawable</a> or apply padding directly within the View or Composable containing the bitmap.</li>
        <li><b>Config:</b> Balance memory and quality by choosing the right pixel format. Use <code>RGB_565</code> when transparency isn't needed, which uses half the memory of the default <code>ARGB_8888</code> format. In Glide you can configure this by using <a href="https://bumptech.github.io/glide/javadocs/470/com/bumptech/glide/load/DecodeFormat.html" target="_blank">DecodeFormat</a> and in Coil you can use <a href="https://coil-kt.github.io/coil/api/coil-core/coil3.request/-image-request/" target="_blank">bitmapConfig</a> property.</li>
        <li><b>Prioritize vector drawables:</b> For basic geometric assets, leverage <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/graphics/drawable/ShapeDrawable" target="_blank">ShapeDrawable</a> as a lightweight alternative to decoding rasterized bitmaps. By defining these assets once via XML, you ensure they scale seamlessly across all display densities while effectively eliminating resource-driven memory bloat.</li>
        <li><b>Reuse:</b> If your application manages Bitmaps manually then to minimize memory churn, when a bitmap is no longer required, the app should call <code>bitmap.recycle()</code> and immediately discard the Bitmap reference. If you use an image loading library like Glide or Coil, return the bitmap to the library’s managed pool. By providing an existing buffer for future memory needs, the pool effectively avoids the overhead of new allocations.</li>
    </ol>
    
    <p>Check out our documentation on <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/graphics/images/optimization" target="_blank">Optimizing performance for images</a> to learn more.</p>
    
    <h4><span>Android Studio tooling</span></h4>
    <p>You can also eliminate redundant bitmaps using Android Studio Narwhal 4. Here is how to hunt them down in five simple steps:</p>
    <ol>
        <li>Open the <b>Profiler</b> tab in Android Studio</li>
        <li>Click <b>Heap Dump</b> (or "Analyze Memory Usage") and hit record to take a snapshot of your app’s current memory state.</li>
        <li>Scan the analysis results for the <b>yellow warning triangle</b> ⚠️, which Android Studio uses to flag duplicate bitmaps being stored multiple times. Alternatively, navigate to the profiler header, choose "Filter by:" and pick the "Duplicate Bitmaps" setting.</li>
        <li>Click on any flagged entry to open the <b>Bitmap Preview</b> pane, allowing you to see exactly which image is the repeat offender.</li>
        <li>Use that visual confirmation to track down the redundant loading logic in your code and implement a better caching strategy.</li>
    </ol>
</div>

<div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiDJ6djtozFY7DzrGB-EN8ajLVueF9MdLd4mod4jhtO8YwCzU7ObOwQ2w0Bap5A5NHJ7KVnXIRQqhW8cTdcFhMJPw5FIW1WU7D_Mwm-UC9Fsdr-MOn62xijpjKcS0NeUBnO957jmogGEISNQgeZQk3BVvUWK4BknTjLiuK2TbWCqwO3uTLkjkFhLwJre7w/s2379/pic3-IO26_113_TSV%20-dup-bitmaps-cropped.jpg"><img border="0" data-original-height="1162" data-original-width="2379" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiDJ6djtozFY7DzrGB-EN8ajLVueF9MdLd4mod4jhtO8YwCzU7ObOwQ2w0Bap5A5NHJ7KVnXIRQqhW8cTdcFhMJPw5FIW1WU7D_Mwm-UC9Fsdr-MOn62xijpjKcS0NeUBnO957jmogGEISNQgeZQk3BVvUWK4BknTjLiuK2TbWCqwO3uTLkjkFhLwJre7w/s16000/pic3-IO26_113_TSV%20-dup-bitmaps-cropped.jpg"></a></div><div class="separator"><i>Look for the yellow warning triangle ⚠️ in heap dumps when using the Android Studio Profiler.</i></div>

<h3>Detect and fix memory leaks with Android Studio</h3>
<p>Memory leaks in Android occur when your code holds onto an object's reference long after its lifecycle has ended. This prevents the Garbage Collector (GC) from reclaiming that memory, eventually leading to sluggish performance or OutOfMemoryError (OOM).</p>
<p>Android Studio Panda 3 features a dedicated <a href="https://square.github.io/leakcanary/" target="_blank">LeakCanary</a> profiler task, allowing developers to analyze real-time memory leaks and map traces within the IDE.</p>
<p>The LeakCanary profiler task in Android Studio actively moves the memory leak analysis from your device to your development machine, resulting in a significant performance boost during the leak analysis phase as compared to on-device leak analysis.</p>

<div class="separator">
    <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKBixtkwy1hzwA6mikjRX_6vBJ9OQ_RCYdF94HUF8kOLYzQoQrPMLh_6h9u6EGeLzgFc8yjxg3_8zlqWIDCvKa1py5gyxDXasl8JLPDHSEgPpzPyYqzcme69rRKtfIlhMtyNRWXutGXNy-4WcefhSTBhqBgobK678fqvNqL5peOz1UD6ouunLaKPmJCw0/s2048/pic4-android-studio-leaks.png">
        <img border="0" data-original-height="975" data-original-width="2048" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKBixtkwy1hzwA6mikjRX_6vBJ9OQ_RCYdF94HUF8kOLYzQoQrPMLh_6h9u6EGeLzgFc8yjxg3_8zlqWIDCvKa1py5gyxDXasl8JLPDHSEgPpzPyYqzcme69rRKtfIlhMtyNRWXutGXNy-4WcefhSTBhqBgobK678fqvNqL5peOz1UD6ouunLaKPmJCw0/s16000/pic4-android-studio-leaks.png">
    </a>
</div>
<div>
    <i>LeakCanary memory leak analysis contextualized with <b>Go to declaration</b> for debugging</i>
</div>

<p>Additionally, the leak analysis is now contextualized within the IDE and fully integrated with your source code, providing features like go to declaration and other helpful code connections that drastically reduce the friction and time required to investigate and fix memory leaks.</p>

<div>
    <h4><span>Examples of common memory leaks </span></h4>
    <p>Memory leaks occur when an object persists in memory beyond its intended lifespan. This typically happens due to:</p>
    <ul>
        <li>Retaining references to Fragments, Activities, or Views that are no longer in use.</li>
        <li>Mismanaging Context references.</li>
        <li>Failing to properly unregister observers, listeners, and receivers.</li>
        <li>Creating static references to objects that are bound to components with shorter lifecycles.</li>
    </ul>
    
    <p>Here are a few example scenarios:</p>
    
    <div align="left" dir="ltr">
        <table>
            <colgroup>
                <col>
                <col>
                <col>
            </colgroup>
            <tbody>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Scenario</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Compose-based example</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">View-based example</span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Leaking Context</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Example:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Passing LocalContext.current to a ViewModel</span></p>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Fix:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Keep <code>Context</code> dependent logic within the UI layer. For non-UI layers, refactor to use <a href="https://developer.android.com/training/dependency-injection">dependency injection</a> or observe UI state using <a href="https://developer.android.com/kotlin/flow">Kotlin flow</a>.</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Example:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Storing an <code>Activity</code> in a companion object or static variable.</span></p>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Fix:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Don’t hold static references to UI components. Refactor to use <a href="https://developer.android.com/training/dependency-injection">dependency injection</a> or observe UI state using <a href="https://developer.android.com/kotlin/flow">Kotlin flow</a>.</span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Leaking Listeners</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Example:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Using <code>DisposableEffect</code> to start a listener but leaving <code>onDispose</code> empty.</span></p>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Fix:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Perform the unregistration and <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/side-effects#disposableeffect">cleanup logic</a> inside the <code>onDispose</code> block.</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Example:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Registering for SensorManager updates and forgetting to unregister.</span></p>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Fix:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Manually call <code>unregisterListener()</code> in <code>onStop()</code> or <code>onDestroy()</code> lifecycle.</span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
                <tr>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Leaking Views</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Example:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Holding a reference to a legacy <code>View</code> inside an <code>AndroidView</code> without a release strategy.</span></p>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Fix:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Use the <code>release</code> block of the <code>AndroidView</code> composable to clean up the legacy <code>View</code>.</span></p>
                    </td>
                    <td>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Example:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Keeping a reference to a view binding object after the <code>Fragment</code> is destroyed.</span></p>
                        <p dir="ltr"><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Fix:</span><br><span face="'Google Sans',sans-serif">Set the binding variable to <code>null</code> inside the <code>onDestroyView</code>() lifecycle method.</span></p>
                    </td>
                </tr>
            </tbody>
        </table>
    </div>
</div>

<h3>Trim memory when app leaves visible state</h3>
<p>Android can reclaim memory from your app or stop your app entirely if necessary to free up memory for critical tasks, as explained in <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/memory-overview" target="_blank">Overview of memory management</a>. Android will usually reclaim memory from your app when it’s not visible to the user, such as by discarding some of your app’s code and data pages in memory or compressing your heap allocations. When the user resumes your app and your app tries to access some memory that’s been reclaimed, the OS will swap that memory back in on demand. This swapping behavior can be slow, and cause unexpected jank or stutters in your app.</p>
<p>If you leave it to the OS to decide what memory to reclaim from your app, you may find that the OS reclaimed memory that you’ll need shortly after resuming your app. Instead, your app can voluntarily discard memory allocations that it can regenerate later, on demand and at a low cost. To do so, you can implement the <code>ComponentCallbacks2</code> interface. You can implement <code>onTrimMemory</code> in your <code>Activity</code>, <code>Fragment</code>, <code>Service</code>, or even your custom <code>Application</code> class. Using it in the <code>Application</code> class is highly effective for global cache management.</p>
<p>The provided <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/content/ComponentCallbacks2#onTrimMemory(int)" target="_blank">onTrimMemory()</a> callback method notifies your app of lifecycle or memory-related events that present a good opportunity for your app to voluntarily reduce its memory usage.</p>
<p>In terms of memory lifecycle management, your implementation should focus <b>exclusively</b> on <code>TRIM_MEMORY_UI_HIDDEN</code> and <code>TRIM_MEMORY_BACKGROUND</code>. Since Android 14, the system has ceased delivering notifications for other legacy constants, which were formally deprecated in Android 15.</p>
<p><code>TRIM_MEMORY_UI_HIDDEN</code>: This signal indicates that your application's UI has transitioned out of the user's view. This provides an opportunity to release substantial memory allocations tied strictly to the interface—such as Bitmaps, video playback buffers, or complex animation resources.</p>
<p><code>TRIM_MEMORY_BACKGROUND</code>: At this level, your process is residing in the background and is now a candidate for termination to satisfy the system's global memory needs. To extend the duration your process remains in the cached state, and reduce the number of app cold starts, you should aggressively release any resources that can be easily reconstructed once the user resumes their session.</p>

<pre><code>import android.content.ComponentCallbacks2
// Other import statements.

class MainActivity : AppCompatActivity(), ComponentCallbacks2 {

    /**
     * Release memory when the UI becomes hidden or when system resources become low.
     * @param level the memory-related event that is raised.
     */
    override fun onTrimMemory(level: Int) {

        if (level &gt;= ComponentCallbacks2.TRIM_MEMORY_UI_HIDDEN) {
            // Release memory related to UI elements, such as bitmap caches.
        }

        if (level &gt;= ComponentCallbacks2.TRIM_MEMORY_BACKGROUND) {
            // Release memory related to background processing, such as by
            // closing a database connection.
        }
    }
}</code></pre>

<p>Note: The <code>onTrimMemory</code> integration may depend on SDK support. For instance, certain games rely on their game engine to enable this capability. Please check out the <a href="https://developer.android.com/games/optimize/memory-allocation" target="_blank">game memory optimization documents</a>.</p>

<h3>Advanced memory observability with ProfilingManager</h3>
<p>To catch and diagnose memory issues in the field that cannot be reproduced locally, you should leverage the <b>ProfilingManager API</b>. Introduced in Android 15, this advanced observability API allows you to programmatically collect real-user Perfetto profiles.</p>
<p>For teams that lack a dedicated infrastructure to manage and host performance artifacts, Crashlytics is exploring a specialized solution to streamline this workflow. They are inviting developers to <a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe299a_zSNDfa164z7yyqoDjS05ZDRN86bAQKajuAOFEQ4G-w/viewform" target="_blank">provide feedback</a>.</p>

<p><b>Android 17 introduces new event-driven triggers</b>, most notably <code>TRIGGER_TYPE_OOM</code> and <code>TRIGGER_TYPE_ANOMALY</code>:</p>
<ul>
    <li>The <b>OOM trigger</b> automatically collects a Java heap dump at the exact moment an OutOfMemoryError crash occurs, providing precise allocation states. A collected OOM profile is provided the next time the app starts and registers the <code>registerForAllProfilingResults</code> callback.</li>
    <li>The <b>Anomaly trigger</b> detects severe performance issues, such as excessive binder spam or breached memory thresholds. The memory anomaly delivers a heap dump just prior to the system terminating the app.</li>
</ul>

<pre><code>  val profilingManager = 
applicationContext.getSystemService(ProfilingManager::class.java)
    val triggers = ArrayList<profilingtrigger>()  


    triggers.add(ProfilingTrigger.Builder(
                 ProfilingTrigger.TRIGGER_TYPE_ANOMALY))
    val mainExecutor: Executor = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor()
    val resultCallback = Consumer<profilingresult> { profilingResult -&gt;
        if (profilingResult.errorCode != ProfilingResult.ERROR_NONE) {
            // upload profile result to server for further analysis          
            setupProfileUploadWorker(profilingResult.resultFilePath)
        } 

    profilingManager.registerForAllProfilingResults(mainExecutor, resultCallback)
    profilingManager.addProfilingTriggers(triggers)</profilingresult></profilingtrigger></code></pre>

<p>
    Once you’ve collected the heap dump, you can download the profile from the server, or locally via adb pull and drag and drop the file into the <a href="http://ui.perfetto.dev/" target="_blank">Perfetto UI</a>. To streamline your memory debugging workflow, use the <a href="https://perfetto.dev/docs/visualization/heap-dump-explorer" target="_blank">Heap Dump Explorer</a>, this is the new default view for heap dumps in Perfetto UI. This tool provides an intuitive interface for inspecting Java heap dumps, allowing you to visualize object allocation hierarchies, compute retained memory sizes, and identify the shortest path from garbage collection root. By leveraging the Heap Dump Explorer, you can rapidly pinpoint memory leaks, bloated retained objects such as excessive bitmap allocations, and analyze heap object allocations all in one place.
</p>

<div class="separator">
    <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhobASfyUbXdAYD_MOjREv7RUhCwoNJ9sB4QDSImRfA0UrALJqwQ2ovgAF7YRt3f26UeZoIQa-yDxiSDO84gxv1XkQ8acf8E795-IgAe4tl8AM_7m7nSEuj7t_rhtpgM3f-76_lEh-k7Rltku79-VCuIDN_2Q9DRjJyouCKbxg4pDXHV2yey7V8WlG2jQM/s2048/pic5-perfettoheapdump-analyzer.png">
        <img border="0" data-original-height="1039" data-original-width="2048" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhobASfyUbXdAYD_MOjREv7RUhCwoNJ9sB4QDSImRfA0UrALJqwQ2ovgAF7YRt3f26UeZoIQa-yDxiSDO84gxv1XkQ8acf8E795-IgAe4tl8AM_7m7nSEuj7t_rhtpgM3f-76_lEh-k7Rltku79-VCuIDN_2Q9DRjJyouCKbxg4pDXHV2yey7V8WlG2jQM/s16000/pic5-perfettoheapdump-analyzer.png">
    </a>
</div>
<div>
    <i>Use the <a href="https://perfetto.dev/docs/visualization/heap-dump-explorer">Heap Dump Explorer</a>’s embedded flamegraph to visually inspect and navigate through objects with the highest heap allocations.</i>
</div>

<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>Optimizing bytecode with R8, adopting image loading best practices, and resolving memory leaks are critical steps toward delivering a high-quality user experience while managing resources effectively under pressure. Adopting these proactive measures helps maintain app stability and performance, preventing unexpected terminations while safeguarding user context. To further your performance expertise, explore our revised <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/memory" target="_blank">memory guidance</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Datadog delivers millions of in-depth performance insights with ProfilingManager]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Alice Yuan, Developer Relations Engineer at Google, Arti Arutiunov, Product Manager at Datadog and Nikita Ogorodnikov, Staff Software Engineer at Datadog


  Performance regressions are notoriously hard to reproduce, making regressions a massive bottleneck for mobile developers. Althoug...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693507/android-tipps/datadog-delivers-millions-of-in-depth-performance-insights-with-profilingmanager/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693507/android-tipps/datadog-delivers-millions-of-in-depth-performance-insights-with-profilingmanager/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEh92CmF7Hos-AKsEmr3k9Va10fhbed32pj4r9wxbUAlpyAIh2GV0KhvsRYzkmATQgflpHYdfAgdFkRfq1ki2G7ty5wKfzoaoyYknCOEjb6Auz7r0Zcfk0tR6VCX-3o3L9fpcs419uI5iNdBiOtno7ughGWD0SGJ5n3sfWPEB7ZJ9M_HQFDLhBQ_hv3HFQ8">
<p>Posted by Alice Yuan, Developer Relations Engineer at Google, Arti Arutiunov, Product Manager at Datadog and Nikita Ogorodnikov, Staff Software Engineer at Datadog</p><p></p><p></p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjICmOZHTF4gmgXj1G4r5Fp48jM_W4fN9tjxbdnesvaxjUsuwmrftmILW-CErt5cXGcZp93UGtLy8fBehhZxwZ2oxtjQLNb269jHfkNA3XBHnn9JIVZbApeatdCi9gX6ylK7-5A-DzQ3VSRi8hJCNp_8699CzeD9H0y26Tl-6DO8FIafh9UQFyrpa_C9DA"><img alt="" data-original-height="1253" data-original-width="4209" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjICmOZHTF4gmgXj1G4r5Fp48jM_W4fN9tjxbdnesvaxjUsuwmrftmILW-CErt5cXGcZp93UGtLy8fBehhZxwZ2oxtjQLNb269jHfkNA3XBHnn9JIVZbApeatdCi9gX6ylK7-5A-DzQ3VSRi8hJCNp_8699CzeD9H0y26Tl-6DO8FIafh9UQFyrpa_C9DA=s16000"></a></div><br><br><p></p>

<p>
  Performance regressions are notoriously hard to reproduce, making regressions a massive bottleneck for mobile developers. Although signals like ANR rates indicate what issues occur in production, pinpointing the specific line of code that resulted in the performance issue has historically necessitated exhaustive manual reproduction or speculative trial-and-error experimentation.
</p>

<p>Datadog collaborated with Google to mitigate this frustration by integrating the ProfilingManager API (available on Android 15+ devices) into its Real User Monitoring (RUM) and Continuous Profiling platforms. This integration transforms the debugging workflow, allowing developers to move beyond surface-level symptoms to being able to detect the <em>why</em> behind a performance bottleneck.
</p>

By leveraging this system-level API, Datadog now processes millions of production profiles weekly across the globe according to Datadog internal data of June 2026. It provides engineering teams with a new level of visibility into real-world performance, all while maintaining a low runtime overhead for production-scale performance monitoring.

<h3>The impact of ProfilingManager</h3><p>
  ProfilingManager is a system service introduced in Android 15 that enables apps to programmatically collect performance data such as call stack samples, field traces and memory heap dumps directly from production environments. This capability shifts the engineering paradigm from reactive manual reproduction to proactive field analysis.</p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWVOhdnTTwX9DT3ROPHDLHKm1aJ8Z0vo5wYsHTULe7oRBqsi2-pTblEC1ggNuVXdd5rCZv6RooG4dsdOqMM_8URLUxierH3KjujbTyVSFrqNIs01zMqb_o7uXFeYECms5s_CkX1WvAPaQeO5W9bpnvD4S4BNN0mH9qbanuTukvCg8LTozhNEhY0CQ0o0Q/s1280/AANDDM_DataDog_Quote_01.png"><img alt="ProfilingManager is a highly performant solution for code-level insights.  Of the solutions we evaluated, it has the lowest runtime overhead,  gives deep visibility into Java, Kotlin, and C++ traces, and opens the door to gather memory profiles and system-level traces during critical moments like ANRs and out-of-memory (OOM) errors. Yi Lu, Senior Engineer at Datadog" border="0" data-original-height="720" data-original-width="1280" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWVOhdnTTwX9DT3ROPHDLHKm1aJ8Z0vo5wYsHTULe7oRBqsi2-pTblEC1ggNuVXdd5rCZv6RooG4dsdOqMM_8URLUxierH3KjujbTyVSFrqNIs01zMqb_o7uXFeYECms5s_CkX1WvAPaQeO5W9bpnvD4S4BNN0mH9qbanuTukvCg8LTozhNEhY0CQ0o0Q/s16000/AANDDM_DataDog_Quote_01.png"></a></div><br><p><br></p>

For example, a Google communications app used field traces to investigate why its cold start times were slower on newer, more powerful hardware. By diving into the field-collected traces and comparing traces across different device types, the engineer discovered a hidden scheduling issue: a background text-to-speech service was unnecessarily being prewarmed during app startup. The traces revealed that this background process was monopolizing the device's highest-performing big CPU core, forcing the app's main thread to sleep while the prewarm occurred.

<h3>Solving the Android code-level visibility challenge</h3><p>
  Prior to the implementation of ProfilingManager, Datadog’s Real User Monitoring (RUM) focused on high-level application health and session-level telemetry to assess the user journey. Engineering teams could monitor Android performance signals like time to initial display, ANR rates, CPU load, and frozen frames. These insights extended to granular interactions, such as network latency, touch events, and main thread hangs. However, while this data effectively highlighted which performance bottlenecks were surfacing in the field, it provided no clear path to identifying the root cause of these failures.</p><div><span face='"Google Sans", sans-serif'><br></span></div><p></p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjW4Lm-zE5X2trjidQ0eh9i_Bhiwd7HnkOcMeRtA_4dABpGG0EPuer564cLFK4o3eb_N_zWmBAgpOa58eygLH5hwFF6kMg_4GFC98vRN4pd1LNZ-PG9W5wyHv-ptVcmIGo1M7FNPi9PKQ9iGsyZeVfr5jDK46HJHU-1Gsc6IZJdSvhrZVavqKiZmyYar0o"><img alt="We realized that across our profiling features, performance profiling on mobile applications remained a blind spot. Teams could see that an Android user experienced a slow screen render or an ANR, but lacked the same code-level visibility they relied on for their backend services. - Bryan Antigua, Senior Product Manager at Datadog" data-original-height="720" data-original-width="1280" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEjW4Lm-zE5X2trjidQ0eh9i_Bhiwd7HnkOcMeRtA_4dABpGG0EPuer564cLFK4o3eb_N_zWmBAgpOa58eygLH5hwFF6kMg_4GFC98vRN4pd1LNZ-PG9W5wyHv-ptVcmIGo1M7FNPi9PKQ9iGsyZeVfr5jDK46HJHU-1Gsc6IZJdSvhrZVavqKiZmyYar0o=s16000"></a></div><br><br><p></p>

<p>
  To address this, Datadog needed a profiling engine capable of capturing Android traces directly from devices in production with minimal performance impact. After evaluating alternative approaches, such as writing their own trace processor using Android Debug APIs, the team selected ProfilingManager because it is the most performant solution of the profiling options they evaluated and offloads the sampling decisions overhead to the OS.
</p>

<p>
  ProfilingManager supports a wide range of collection methods, including CPU traces, call stack sampling, memory analysis through Java heap dumps and native heap profiles. It enables developers to profile production builds, upload trace files to external storage, and review them in the Perfetto trace analyzer UI. As a SaaS provider, Datadog uploads, visualizes, and analyzes these profiles collected via its SDK, providing a unified view of application health. 
</p>

By centralizing high-fidelity telemetry within a unified observability API, ProfilingManager empowers Datadog and its clients to proactively monitor, investigate, and remediate complex Android performance regressions through key technical advantages:

<ul>
  <li>
    <strong>Granular session diagnostics:</strong> ProfilingManager enhances debuggability by delivering direct OS-level trace data, overcoming the visibility and alignment challenges typical of custom logging with system services. To dive deeper, developers can download these traces from Datadog to investigate further in visualization tools like the <a href="https://ui.perfetto.dev/">Perfetto UI</a>. 
  </li>
  <li>
    <strong>Automated telemetry triggers:</strong> By leveraging native system events to initiate trace recordings at key optimization points, Datadog reduces the need to build custom collection logic. While the initial rollout focuses on the <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/ProfilingTrigger?_gl=1*xix6h8*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTc4ODI2NDgwMy4xNzc5MzE2ODcw*_ga_6HH9YJMN9M*czE3NzkzMTY4NzAkbzEkZzAkdDE3NzkzMTY4NzAkajYwJGwwJGgyMTE1NzIyNjk1#TRIGGER_TYPE_APP_FULLY_DRAWN">APP_FULLY_DRAWN </a>signal, there are already plans to expand this observability to include <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/ProfilingTrigger?_gl=1*1hl4p7n*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTc4ODI2NDgwMy4xNzc5MzE2ODcw*_ga_6HH9YJMN9M*czE3NzkzMTY4NzAkbzEkZzAkdDE3NzkzMTY4NzAkajYwJGwwJGgyMTE1NzIyNjk1#TRIGGER_TYPE_ANR">ANR</a>, <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/ProfilingTrigger?_gl=1*8x3pd*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTc4ODI2NDgwMy4xNzc5MzE2ODcw*_ga_6HH9YJMN9M*czE3NzkzMTY4NzAkbzEkZzAkdDE3NzkzMTY4NzAkajYwJGwwJGgyMTE1NzIyNjk1#TRIGGER_TYPE_OOM">OOM</a>, and <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/ProfilingTrigger?_gl=1*1ezx2ma*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTc4ODI2NDgwMy4xNzc5MzE2ODcw*_ga_6HH9YJMN9M*czE3NzkzMTY4NzAkbzEkZzAkdDE3NzkzMTY4NzAkajYwJGwwJGgyMTE1NzIyNjk1#TRIGGER_TYPE_COLD_START">COLD_START</a> triggers.</li>
  <li>
    <strong>Proactive trace snapshots:</strong> By interfacing directly with the system-level Perfetto service (traced), ProfilingManager utilizes a proactive background recording model designed to capture unpredictable issues. This ensures that developers receive a precise visualization of the events leading up to a performance anomaly, offering a level of insight that exceeds what is possible through manual instrumentation. 
  </li>
  <li>
    <strong>Bottleneck detection at scale:</strong> Datadog is able to synthesize telemetry from across Datadog’s global customer base to uncover regressions that only emerge under unique hardware configurations and variable network environments.
  </li>
  <li>
    <strong>System-enforced resource stability:</strong> The API leverages sampling trace collection to ensure performance and user experience impacts remain unnoticeable.
  </li>
  <li>
    <strong>On-device data controls:</strong> ProfilingManager filters out irrelevant information from other processes on-device before the profile is delivered to the app. This minimizes file sizes and ensures that only data relevant to the app's processes is provided.</li>
</ul>

<h3>Processing millions of weekly profiles to optimize real-world apps</h3><p></p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjr2ikpIrv_Km0RiIq-khGPFHpfA5CRYHfnLj2oRxLSuTk2x8qJFoO4UyNiwMpJphecSAVR4aWcJEB7BzvkXYjkyDggRDUYhLTBGhoj5q3b6BmwA5IcsER1_k5tffie6pteW3YNkIwI5Y6rG_Ie35Xzzq-mEnfq8iinA_cd_r5ydCxfRwajPSngrY1591k/s3464/datadog-profiling-blogpost-final.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1686" data-original-width="3464" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjr2ikpIrv_Km0RiIq-khGPFHpfA5CRYHfnLj2oRxLSuTk2x8qJFoO4UyNiwMpJphecSAVR4aWcJEB7BzvkXYjkyDggRDUYhLTBGhoj5q3b6BmwA5IcsER1_k5tffie6pteW3YNkIwI5Y6rG_Ie35Xzzq-mEnfq8iinA_cd_r5ydCxfRwajPSngrY1591k/s16000/datadog-profiling-blogpost-final.png"></a></div><i><div><i>An example of Datadog's time to initial display measurement with </i></div><div><i>stack sampling powered by ProfilingManager</i></div></i><br>Integrating a system-level profiling API into a global monitoring SDK required solving infrastructure challenges. Because ProfilingManager generates highly detailed performance traces, the Datadog engineering team had to build a pipeline capable of parsing and analyzing these profiles on the server side at scale. <span><span>Beyond profile collection, Datadog also emphasizes the importance of balancing sampling frequency with collecting enough data to generate meaningful insights about your application. </span></span>Datadog relies on ProfilingManager’s built-in rate limiting as a critical stability safeguard, preventing excessive telemetry requests from overburdening user devices.<br><br>The team has been profiling Datadog's own native Android application and a number of early adopters’ applications for months, gathering millions of profiles to ensure a fast, error-free launch experience and to refine their performance-detection algorithms. Today, the production integration seamlessly scales across a variety of Android devices. <p></p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>By integrating Android’s ProfilingManager API, Datadog successfully closed the visibility gap between backend systems and mobile client applications for their customers. By processing millions of profiles weekly with negligible device overhead, Datadog equips Android developers with the code-level insights necessary to diagnose complex performance bugs instantly, helping developers build smoother applications and improve their app’s performance signals in the Play Store. To adopt the ProfilingManager API directly into your performance observability framework, check out our <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/tracing/profiling-manager/overview">documentation</a>.</p>

<p>
  In the future, Datadog aims to make Android profiling data a first-class input for coding agents to autonomously resolve performance bottlenecks, closing the feedback loop between detection and remediation. Datadog is working toward making Android profiling broadly accessible to developers.
</p>

<p>
  To get started using the Datadog real user monitoring feature powered by ProfilingManager, visit <a href="https://www.datadoghq.com/dg/real-user-monitoring/android-profiling/?utm_source=inbound&amp;utm_medium=corpsite-display&amp;utm_campaign=int-rum-ww-blog-announcement-announcement-androidprofilerblog2026">Datadog Mobile Real User Monitoring</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Android 17 is here]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Matthew McCullough, VP of Product Management, Android DeveloperToday we're releasing Android 17 and making it available on most supported Pixel devices. Look for new devices running Android 17 in the coming months.

Android 17 marks the start of our transition to an intelligence system,...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693505/android-tipps/android-17-is-here/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693505/android-tipps/android-17-is-here/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgV7zuuXjulHty999mGDWY1kfL8Q9SXjYYWn-7JTpMfVdNP78eb5fW9shOpvVdEqK0WnNp7AhdO0qc7pXAaqcfTwXgOGsfZyqcQv8wyD-9niWBpZuP6ZAPHBSetWenN2lMlRS5wi2d71-n8RCYqrLsFhUCEvM7KeoGLnNaDbiyOZQ0vvyr0O580nXK4Vas/s2048/Metadata%20-%20Static.png"><div><i>Posted by Matthew McCullough, VP of Product Management, Android Developer</i></div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5KPJZylMSUXRpKFRUd6oM4fNdEoDRdJzdkzg69P_BVUuIDtXqCqTid6hGH40CoHRw7-f50HsT6rISArklGH982MM4K1jKU16SSymes4JPoE4qOZ5s1lLnkbInpUpdJGu5erAYmSgiefzkkOX_ng3AUJKOzzwC1WMTjk2DxLNia8R1C-ErWc7jT4VP8ew/s4209/Blogger%20Hero%20-%20White.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1253" data-original-width="4209" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5KPJZylMSUXRpKFRUd6oM4fNdEoDRdJzdkzg69P_BVUuIDtXqCqTid6hGH40CoHRw7-f50HsT6rISArklGH982MM4K1jKU16SSymes4JPoE4qOZ5s1lLnkbInpUpdJGu5erAYmSgiefzkkOX_ng3AUJKOzzwC1WMTjk2DxLNia8R1C-ErWc7jT4VP8ew/s16000/Blogger%20Hero%20-%20White.png"></a></div><br><p><br></p><p>Today we're releasing Android 17 and making it available on most supported Pixel devices. Look for new devices running Android 17 in the coming months.</p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjaHGBWXu3yvdXZ-wYQgN6DjN5TEMRIYDJvQDZTOybRZFWsAMhqhl14b9UZmrlXlEIRDioqRc8m3xRjOnQHJPoICkVpCho4qrmKihPbu_SB7dGVNKwlAaX6eWdjLF4VUdGyzGfxtW0ziFggj63e778VVo38qpMKar4E1wuw0MiPCBvBdrTTXCgI1XD04Q/s1080/AfD-Android-17.gif"><img border="0" data-original-height="1080" data-original-width="1080" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjaHGBWXu3yvdXZ-wYQgN6DjN5TEMRIYDJvQDZTOybRZFWsAMhqhl14b9UZmrlXlEIRDioqRc8m3xRjOnQHJPoICkVpCho4qrmKihPbu_SB7dGVNKwlAaX6eWdjLF4VUdGyzGfxtW0ziFggj63e778VVo38qpMKar4E1wuw0MiPCBvBdrTTXCgI1XD04Q/s320/AfD-Android-17.gif" width="320"></a></div>

<p>Android 17 marks the start of our transition to an intelligence system, putting your apps at the center. It's shifting to an adaptive-first development standard by introducing mandatory large-screen resizability, all while delivering next-generation privacy, security, media, camera, and performance. We'll cover all that in this post, as well as how we're bringing together next generation tools, libraries, and agent skills to help your apps embrace the opportunity.</p>

<p>Throughout the past year, from our Canary channel to our Beta releases, we’ve collaborated with you in the developer community to build a platform you and your users can trust. To that end, this moment marks the availability of the source code at the <a href="https://source.android.com/">Android Open Source Project</a> (AOSP). This allows you to <a href="https://cs.android.com/">examine the source code</a> for a deeper understanding of how Android works.</p>

<p>Let's dive deeper into Android 17.</p>

<h3>An intelligence system</h3>

<p>With deep integration between hardware, software and AI, we’re transforming Android from an operating system to an intelligence system. It's about delivering new helpful experiences that anticipate user needs, and it brings more opportunities for engagement with your apps. To that end, Android 17 expands the capabilities of AppFunctions, a platform API with a corresponding Jetpack library. It allows you to contribute your app's unique capabilities as orchestratable "tools" for Android MCP, the on-device equivalent of the <a href="https://modelcontextprotocol.io/">Model Context Protocol</a>. AI agents and assistants (like Google Gemini) can discover and execute AppFunctions to perform workflows on behalf of the user with direct access to the app's local state.</p>

<p>The Jetpack library, currently in alpha, makes adding AppFunctions as easy as annotating a class and adding KDoc comments.</p>

<pre><code>/**
 * A note app's [AppFunction]s.
 */
class NoteFunctions(
    private val noteRepository: NoteRepository
) {
    /**
     * Adds a new note to the app.
     *
     * @param appFunctionContext The execution context.
     * @param title The title of the note.
     * @param content The note's content.
     */
    @AppFunction(isDescribedByKDoc = true)
    suspend fun createNote(
        appFunctionContext: AppFunctionContext,
        title: String,
        content: String
    ): Note {
        return noteRepository.createNote(title, content)
    }
}</code></pre>

<p>We’ve also launched an <a href="http://github.com/android/skills/tree/main/on-device/appfunctions">AppFunctions agent skill</a> that analyzes your app’s key workflows, automatically generates the required Kotlin code, optimizes your KDocs for LLM tool-calling, and provides ADB commands for testing and debugging.</p>

<p>The Gemini integration is currently in a private preview with trusted testers, but you can begin preparing your apps now. In addition to ADB commands to execute your AppFunctions, we've provided a <a href="http://github.com/android/appfunctions/releases/initial">test agent app</a> that includes an interface to discover and execute your app functions and simulate an AI agent integration. Join our integration early access program at <a href="http://goo.gle/eap-af">goo.gle/eap-af</a> for a chance to be among the first apps to deploy AppFunctions to production.</p>

<h3>Adaptive-first</h3>
<p>Your users no longer rely on a single form factor; they transition between phones, foldables, tablets, laptops, automotive displays, and immersive XR environments. Now, with over <a href="https://developer.android.com/blog/posts/adaptive-development-for-the-expanding-android-ecosystem">580 million large screen devices</a> in the hands of users and the <a href="https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/platforms/android/meet-googlebook/">forthcoming launch of Googlebooks</a>, the next generation of ChromeOS built on the Android stack, adaptive is no longer just a technical goal. It’s a massive opportunity to reach highly engaged users, which is one of the reasons we're shifting to an <a href="https://developer.android.com/adaptive-apps">adaptive-first development standard</a>.</p>

<h2>No resizability/orientation restrictions on large screens</h2>
<p>To ensure apps deliver a premium experience across all form factors, including mobile devices running in desktop mode on connected displays, Android 17 (API level 37) removes the developer opt-out for orientation and resizability restrictions on <a href="https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/large-screens">large screen devices</a> (sw &gt; 600 dp) for apps targeting API level 37. The system will ignore legacy manifest attributes and runtime APIs, including screenOrientation, setRequestedOrientation(), resizeableActivity=false, and aspect ratio constraints (minAspectRatio/maxAspectRatio). Games (based on <a href="https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/9859673?hl=en">app category</a> in Google Play) remain exempt. Your app must be ready to adapt to any window size, respect the user's preferred device posture, and support free-form windowing natively.</p>

<h2>Next-gen multitasking: App Bubbles, Bubble Bar, and desktop interactive PiP</h2>
<p>Android 17 introduces powerful new windowing capabilities that redefine how users multitask, demanding even greater layout flexibility from your apps:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>App Bubbles:</strong> Moving beyond the messaging bubbles API, users can now transform any app into a floating bubble by long-pressing its icon on the launcher. This feature is available across phones, foldables, and tablets, enabling lightweight multitasking for any workflow.</li>
    <li><strong>The Bubble Bar:</strong> On large screens (tablets and foldables), the system taskbar now includes a dedicated Bubble Bar to organize, transition between, and dock these floating app bubbles.</li>
    <li><strong>Desktop interactive PiP:</strong> In desktop environments, Android 17 introduces interactive Picture-in-Picture (PiP). Unlike traditional PiP windows which are read-only, these pinned windows remain fully interactive while staying always-on-top of other application windows.</li>
</ul>

<div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg12FRQ31sUiyMj_ZalamTRI4VyI2tMXYKEoRy6b-u0Het272IDbRhznXot7b8AvFJEX-ubw_-pNxyS5JTKPUTBj1CNXwIYkTE906vembUcHeyGzE4Lb72WRyGNF7dOP_aBssNeCplOjEnKAc3d3hkak81LOpG0g9Hlep0AvC11MjdJ1MkqAp7ViUCu2bw/s1600/Bubbles%20(1).gif"><img border="0" data-original-height="1600" data-original-width="1544" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg12FRQ31sUiyMj_ZalamTRI4VyI2tMXYKEoRy6b-u0Het272IDbRhznXot7b8AvFJEX-ubw_-pNxyS5JTKPUTBj1CNXwIYkTE906vembUcHeyGzE4Lb72WRyGNF7dOP_aBssNeCplOjEnKAc3d3hkak81LOpG0g9Hlep0AvC11MjdJ1MkqAp7ViUCu2bw/s16000/Bubbles%20(1).gif"></a></div><p><i>App Bubbles and Bubble Bar in action</i></p>

<h2>Activity recreation updates</h2>
<p>To prevent disruptive state loss and stutter, Android 17 updates the default behavior for Activity recreation. The system will no longer restart activities by default for typical configuration changes that do not require a full UI redraw (including <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/content/pm/ActivityInfo#config_keyboard">CONFIG_KEYBOARD</a>, <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/content/pm/ActivityInfo#config_keyboard_hidden">CONFIG_KEYBOARD_HIDDEN</a>, <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/content/pm/ActivityInfo#config_navigation">CONFIG_NAVIGATION</a>, <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/content/pm/ActivityInfo#config_touchscreen">CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN</a>, and <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/content/pm/ActivityInfo#config_color_mode">CONFIG_COLOR_MODE</a>).<br>
Instead, running activities will receive these updates via onConfigurationChanged(), enabling smooth transitions. If your application explicitly relies on a full restart to reload resources for these changes, you must now explicitly opt-in using the new <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/R.attr#recreateonconfigchanges">android:recreateOnConfigChanges</a> manifest attribute.</p>

<h2>Continue On</h2>
<p>Android 17 adds Continue On to help users seamlessly transition a task between Android devices. The user sees a suggestion for the most recently opened app from their mobile device in their tablet taskbar, providing a one-tap affordance to launch the app and deep-link where they left off. Continue on can support app-to-web transitions, including falling back to using the web if the app isn't installed.</p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjc8K42DCZ0VTYpFhTlEazp9_AthhqYdm786k1NFolZrP7HwXk2QlF7UV1CU7ECK9N-CiHSfSbH_E2_cXwL3zUuesP-shpa1nau5QmVWDOQeErnCMtvZUw_wwAHNewZZ5S3811f0n_FNoX4U9kyptZQONM_eDB1AAHaoFjMFgTCC7G1d0X2iRo1MN8sev0/s1920/Continue%20On.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1200" data-original-width="1920" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjc8K42DCZ0VTYpFhTlEazp9_AthhqYdm786k1NFolZrP7HwXk2QlF7UV1CU7ECK9N-CiHSfSbH_E2_cXwL3zUuesP-shpa1nau5QmVWDOQeErnCMtvZUw_wwAHNewZZ5S3811f0n_FNoX4U9kyptZQONM_eDB1AAHaoFjMFgTCC7G1d0X2iRo1MN8sev0/s16000/Continue%20On.png"></a><i>Handoff Suggestion on a Tablet</i></div><p><br></p>

<pre><code>class MyHandoffActivity : Activity() {

    ...

  override fun onCreate(savedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
    super.onCreate(savedInstanceState)
    // Do stuff
    ...
    // Enable handoff
    setHandoffEnabled(true, null)
  }

  // Override and implement onHandoffActivityDataRequested
  override fun onHandoffActivityDataRequested(handoffRequestInfo: HandoffActivityDataRequestInfo) : HandoffActivityData {
    // Create and return handoff data
  }
}</code></pre>

<h2>Go adaptive-first with Jetpack Compose</h2>
<p>To help you adapt your apps to meet the new Android 17 requirements, we've launched the <a href="https://github.com/android/skills/tree/main/jetpack-compose/adaptive">Jetpack Compose adaptive skill</a>. This AI-powered developer workflow helps you implement the best adaptive practices:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Adaptive navigation:</strong> Automatically transition between bottom navigation bars on mobile and edge-anchored navigation rails on large screens using NavigationSuiteScaffold from the Material 3 Adaptive library.</li>
    <li><strong>Multi-pane layouts:</strong> Implement list-detail and supporting pane layouts natively using Navigation 3 Scenes (ListDetailSceneStrategy and SupportingPaneSceneStrategy) instead of fragile fragment transactions.</li>
    <li><strong>FlexBox &amp; Grid APIs:</strong> Utilize Compose 1.11's dynamic layout components to easily adjust row and column spans on the fly, ensuring your content always fills the space beautifully.</li>
    <li><strong>Advanced non-touch input:</strong> Leverage Compose 1.11's enhanced trackpad and mouse support, including native focus rings and new APIs (like TrackpadInjectionScope and performTrackpadInput) to easily test and deliver a true "laptop-class" experience on Googlebooks and Desktop Mode.</li>
    <li><strong>Dynamic window states:</strong> Leverage Compose's reactive state model to seamlessly adapt your UI when the app transitions from full screen to a floating App Bubble or an interactive Desktop PiP window, ensuring a premium experience even at minimal dimensions.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Android is Compose-first</h2>
<p>Compose offers the easiest way to build adaptive apps, and that's just one of the <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/first#why-compose-first">many reasons</a> we believe that all Android UI should be built with Compose. To that end, <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/first">Android development is now Compose-first</a>. All new Android APIs, libraries, tools, and developer guidance will be built exclusively for Jetpack Compose. Legacy View components (in the android.widget package) and View-based Jetpack libraries (like Fragments, RecyclerView, and ViewPager) are now in maintenance mode. They will receive only critical bug fixes, and no new features.</p>

<blockquote>
    <p><strong>TIP</strong><br>
    Ready to migrate? Use our AI-driven <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/migrate/migrate-xml-views-to-jetpack-compose">XML to Compose Migration Skill</a> to automatically analyze your legacy View layouts and convert them into highly-adaptive Compose code.</p>
</blockquote>

<h3>Performance &amp; efficiency</h3>
<p>App performance means a smooth user interface, fast app start times, and efficient multitasking; Android 17 has impactful improvements in all of these areas.</p>

<h2>App memory limits</h2>
<p>Memory usage is one of the silent foundations of overall performance. When a foreground app or service grows unchecked, memory management spikes CPU and battery utilization and eventually leads to the termination of other well-behaved cached apps and background jobs, ultimately forcing slower cold starts and impaired multitasking. </p>

<p>Starting in Android 17, the system will enforce strict app memory limits based on a device's total RAM, abruptly terminating offending processes. New things to help you navigate these tighter requirements:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>R8 Optimizer:</strong> The R8 optimizer significantly reduces your app's bytecode memory footprint by shrinking classes, methods, and fields into shorter names, and stripping out unused code and resources. Use R8 in full mode along with the new <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/performance/app-optimization/r8-configuration-analyzer">R8 configuration analyzer</a> to make sure your app is getting the most from R8.<div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQePgjeISaotpA-miDPKel-qgAYtepLjMMBaiKZQqTf_iYRTJurn_iAFdC7utLnKRKAh9OhSjF_D83skA2PPg7xts0ORX7aVxBkoax6b9uEPqTlGiY_sh8Xv7U1pr0h4Nm8FLo-h3IJD8FhTJc-gOtpBwyLCnDBUPRJAuaaBjsIOhvUmTXFSna0ykksak/s2048/R8%20Configuration%20Analyzer.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="397" data-original-width="2048" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiQePgjeISaotpA-miDPKel-qgAYtepLjMMBaiKZQqTf_iYRTJurn_iAFdC7utLnKRKAh9OhSjF_D83skA2PPg7xts0ORX7aVxBkoax6b9uEPqTlGiY_sh8Xv7U1pr0h4Nm8FLo-h3IJD8FhTJc-gOtpBwyLCnDBUPRJAuaaBjsIOhvUmTXFSna0ykksak/s16000/R8%20Configuration%20Analyzer.png"></a></div></li></ul><div><span><u><br></u></span></div><div><span><u><br></u></span></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>The R8 Configuration Analyzer</div><ul><li><strong>LeakCanary in Android Studio Panda:</strong> The profiler now features native LeakCanary integration as a dedicated task, fully integrated with your IDE and source code.</li>
    <li><strong>ApplicationExitInfo:</strong> If your app is terminated by these limits, getDescription() from ApplicationExitInfo will return "MemoryLimiter:AnonSwap".</li>
    <li><strong>On-Device Anomaly Detection:</strong> Part of ProfilingManager, you can leverage trigger-based profiling using TRIGGER_TYPE_ANOMALY to automatically capture heap dumps when the memory limit is reached.</li>
</ul>

<pre><code>val profilingManager = applicationContext
   .getSystemService(ProfilingManager::class.java)

val triggers = ArrayList&lt;ProfilingTrigger&gt;().apply {
  add(ProfilingTrigger.Builder(
    ProfilingTrigger.TRIGGER_TYPE_ANOMALY).build())
}
profilingManager.addProfilingTriggers(triggers)</code></pre>

<p>And, we're working to surface more in-field memory metrics to you within Google Play Console.</p>

<h2>Generational garbage collection</h2>
<p><a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions">Android 17</a> introduces more frequent, less resource-intensive young-generation collections to <a href="https://developer.android.com/guide/platform#art">ART</a>'s Concurrent Mark-Compact garbage collector (GC). By separating short-lived objects from stable, long-lived ones, the system runs frequent, lightweight "young-generation" sweeps rather than expensive full-heap scans, drastically reducing CPU usage, power drain, and UI stutter. Our testing has shown significant improvements in GC interference with application threads and a reduction in the maximum memory resident set size (RSS). ART improvements are also available to over a billion devices running Android 12 (API level 31) and higher through Google Play System updates.</p>

<h2>Lock-Free MessageQueue</h2>
<p>For apps targeting SDK 37 or higher, the core <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/MessageQueue"><b>android.os.MessageQueue</b></a> now implements a lock-free architecture, significantly reducing missed frames, improving app startup time, and radically improving the performance of busy queues in multithreaded scenarios. Note: This can break apps that use reflection on private <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/MessageQueue"><b>MessageQueue</b></a> fields and methods.  The <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/TestLooperManager#peekWhen()"><b>peekWhen</b></a> and <b><a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/TestLooperManager#poll()">poll</a> </b>APIs have been added to <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/TestLooperManager"><b>TestLooperManager</b></a> for instrumentation testing without relying on <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/MessageQueue"><b>MessageQueue</b></a> internals.</p>

<h2>Static final fields now truly final</h2>
<p>Starting from Android 17, apps targeting SDK 37 or higher won’t be able to modify “static final” fields, allowing the runtime to apply performance optimizations more aggressively. An attempt to do so via reflection (or deep reflection) will lead to an IllegalAccessException being thrown. Modifying them via JNI’s <b><code>SetStatic&lt;Type&gt;Field</code></b> methods family will immediately crash the application.</p>

<h2>Custom notification view restrictions</h2>
<p>To reduce memory usage we are further restricting the size of <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/views/notifications/custom-notification">custom notification views</a>. This update closes a loophole that allows apps to bypass existing limits using URIs. This behavior is gated by the target SDK version and takes effect for apps targeting API 37 and higher.</p>

<h3>Privacy &amp; Security</h3>
<p>Maintaining user trust is at the heart of the Android ecosystem. Android 17 introduces robust features that protect sensitive data while simplifying user experiences.</p>

<h2>Privacy-preserving choices</h2>
<p>Historically, apps required broad, permanent permissions to access information like contacts, precise location and media files. Android 17 continues the shift toward privacy-preserving choices that grant temporary, session-based access only to the data the user explicitly selects:</p>
<ul>
  <li><strong>System-Level Contact Picker:</strong> Utilizing <code>ACTION_PICK_CONTACTS</code>, apps can request temporary access only to specific fields (e.g., email or phone number) chosen by the user, eliminating the need for the broad <code>READ_CONTACTS</code> permission. It also fully supports work/personal profile separation.</li>
    <li><strong>Customizable Photo Picker aspect ratio:</strong> Using<b><code>PhotoPickerUiCustomizationParams</code></b>, you can customize the system photo picker to show thumbnails in portrait mode. This is perfect for apps that always display photos and videos in portrait such as video based social media apps.</li>
    <li><strong>System-rendered Location Button:</strong> A new system-rendered location button that you can embed in your app grants precise location access for the current session only.</li>
    <li><strong>EyeDropper API:</strong> A new system-level API, <code>ACTION_OPEN_EYE_DROPPER</code>, allows your app to create a system-powered eyedropper enabling the user to select color from any pixel on the display. This provides a secure, privacy-preserving color-picking experience that eliminates the need for broad, sensitive screen capture or media projection permissions.</li>
</ul>

<pre><code>val eyeDropperLauncher = registerForActivityResult(ActivityResultContracts.StartActivityForResult()) { result -&gt;
   if (result.resultCode == Activity.RESULT_OK) {
       val color = result.data?.getIntExtra(Intent.EXTRA_COLOR, Color.BLACK)
       // Use the picked color in your app
   }
}
fun launchColorPicker() {
   val intent = Intent(Intent.ACTION_OPEN_EYE_DROPPER)
   eyeDropperLauncher.launch(intent)
}</code></pre>

<div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh8m_oR9WymjE9G26nGUCqdhS9GrBd6FXN3ujWbjq7ECD6OMGhS4xUApWkAWpPpRef7lwLhsRE2jYL9FADoF_FX2eMXD-0hp9JVaCzrDhfU8RYJ9qv-Ds9YIwyQK7yHKidW0oOtX1rpg2pG9x2yNp3UkGJDPqUlHX7hiLb-bvDue67FPZK1O-22SuXbO8I/s1267/Eyedropper%20Tester.webp"><img border="0" data-original-height="713" data-original-width="1267" height="360" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh8m_oR9WymjE9G26nGUCqdhS9GrBd6FXN3ujWbjq7ECD6OMGhS4xUApWkAWpPpRef7lwLhsRE2jYL9FADoF_FX2eMXD-0hp9JVaCzrDhfU8RYJ9qv-Ds9YIwyQK7yHKidW0oOtX1rpg2pG9x2yNp3UkGJDPqUlHX7hiLb-bvDue67FPZK1O-22SuXbO8I/w640-h360/Eyedropper%20Tester.webp" width="640"></a></div><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><span><span face="Arial, sans-serif"><i>Picking a color from anywhere on the screen with the system EyeDropper</i></span></span></h3><h2>Local network access</h2>
<p>Apps targeting Android 17 now either require the <code><a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/Manifest.permission#access_local_network">ACCESS_LOCAL_NETWORK</a></code> runtime permission or the use of system-mediated, privacy-preserving device pickers for local network communication, such as talking to smart home devices or casting receivers. Because <code>ACCESS_LOCAL_NETWORK</code>  falls under the existing <code><a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/Manifest.permission_group#NEARBY_DEVICES">NEARBY_DEVICES</a></code> permission group, users who have already granted other <code><a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/Manifest.permission_group#NEARBY_DEVICES">NEARBY_DEVICES</a></code> permissions will not be prompted again. </p>

<h2>SMS OTP protection</h2>
<p>Android 17 expands SMS one-time-password (OTP) protection by delaying access to SMS messages for three hours:</p>
<ul>
  <li>WebOTP Format: <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-all#sms-otp-all-apps">Delayed for all apps that are not the intended recipient (domain mismatch)</a>.</li>
  <li>Standard SMS OTP: <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-17#sms-otp-protection">Delayed for all apps targeting SDK 37+</a>.</li>
  <li>Exemptions: Default SMS, assistant, and connected companion apps are exempt. Apps are strongly encouraged to migrate to the <a href="https://developer.android.com/identity/sms-retriever">SMS Retriever</a> or <a href="https://developers.google.com/identity/sms-retriever/user-consent/overview">SMS User Consent APIs</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)</h2>
<p>Android 17 is ready for the next generation of cryptographic security:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Keystore Integration: Supported devices can generate ML-DSA (Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Algorithm) keys in secure hardware to produce quantum-safe signatures, exposed via standard JCA APIs.</li>
  <li>Hybrid APK Signing: Introducing the v3.2 APK Signature Scheme, which combines classical signatures with ML-DSA signatures to secure app delivery.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Safer native dynamic code loading </h2>
If your app targets SDK 37 or higher, the Safer Dynamic Code Loading (DCL) protection <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/14/behavior-changes-14#safer-dynamic-code-loading">introduced in Android 14</a> for DEX and JAR files now extends to native libraries. All native files loaded using System.load must be marked as read-only. Otherwise, the system throws UnsatisfiedLinkError

<h2>Smarter password protection for physical inputs</h2>
<p>With Android 17, we're making it safer to enter passwords, PINs, and other secrets when using a physical keyboard by no longer showing the last typed character by default.</p>
<p>Users can still easily customize these display settings to match their preferences (availability may vary by device manufacturer).</p>
<p>These enhanced privacy protections are automatically supported byAndroid's built-in SDK components and will be supported in Compose 1.12 for SecureTextFields. </p>

<h3><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgFjWXyRLybiLVAIrIm1_60XHXhPmpB1QEph7AuqsGHs-NihIDRFbUgBh32gUKxo30173W-RpEInX9hmYFVnW5V8ZqtM3n_CzxlT0B0PVQr0LSOuOi7x2kZgN_jHRRlYJ7bYInZllvUGNoA_SrXkNi5wwHvUghUcnl0Gsgx_-ts4QEHq_KdbEYgWCg92xA/s798/Hide%20First%20Letter.gif"><img border="0" data-original-height="449" data-original-width="798" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgFjWXyRLybiLVAIrIm1_60XHXhPmpB1QEph7AuqsGHs-NihIDRFbUgBh32gUKxo30173W-RpEInX9hmYFVnW5V8ZqtM3n_CzxlT0B0PVQr0LSOuOi7x2kZgN_jHRRlYJ7bYInZllvUGNoA_SrXkNi5wwHvUghUcnl0Gsgx_-ts4QEHq_KdbEYgWCg92xA/s16000/Hide%20First%20Letter.gif"></a></div></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><h3><br></h3><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><i><div><i>Smarter password protection for physical inputs</i></div></i><div><br></div><h2>Media and camera features that empower creators and delight users
</h2><p>Android 17 introduces new <a href="https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/platforms/android/android-17-creator-features/">creator features</a> that give access to pro-quality cameras and media, all while improving the experience for consumers.</p>

<ul>
  <li><a href="https://developer.android.com/media/platform/integrate-eclipsa-video">Eclipsa Video</a>: HDR video standard built upon the <a href="https://github.com/SMPTE/st2094-50">SMPTE ST 2094-50 specification</a> that introduces new metadata to help devices adapt content for their display headroom and ambient light conditions, as well as improve the simultaneous display of standard and HDR content.</li>
  <li>RAW14 image format: New support for the <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/graphics/ImageFormat#raw14">RAW14 image format</a> provides a way for your professional camera app to capture the highest level of detail and color depth from compatible camera sensors.</li>
  <li>Vendor-defined camera extensions: Vendor-defined extensions enable hardware partners to define and implement custom camera extension modes, providing access to the best and latest camera features.</li>
  <li>Extended HE-AAC software encoder: A new system-provided Extended HE-AAC software encoder, supports both low and high bitrates using unified speech and audio coding, providing significantly better audio quality for voice messages in low-bandwidth conditions, including support for loudness metadata.</li>
  <li><a href="https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/media/media-formats#video-formats">Versatile Video Coding (H.266)</a>:  Enables OEMs to add codec support by defining the <a href="https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/media/media-formats#video-formats">video/vvc</a> MIME type in <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/MediaFormat"><code>MediaFormat</code></a>, adding new VVC profiles in <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/MediaCodecInfo"><code>MediaCodecInfo</code></a>, and integrating support into <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/MediaExtractor"><code>MediaExtractor</code></a>.</li>
  <li>Camera device type: New APIs that query the underlying device type to identify if a camera is built-in hardware, an external USB webcam, or a virtual camera.</li>
  <li>Constant Quality for Video Recording: <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/MediaRecorder#setVideoEncodingQuality(int)"><code>SetVideoEncodingQuality</code></a> in <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/MediaRecorder"><code>MediaRecorder</code></a> configures a constant quality (CQ) mode for video encoders to ensure uniform visual fidelity across the entire video.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Better support for hearing aids</h2>
<ul>
  <li>Bluetooth LE Audio hearing aid support: Android now includes a specific device category for Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) Audio hearing aids with the new <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/AudioDeviceInfo#TYPE_BLE_HEARING_AID"><code>AudioDeviceInfo.TYPE_BLE_HEARING_AID</code></a> constant, so your app can distinguish hearing aids from regular headsets to provide a tailored experience for users with assistive listening devices.</li>
  <li>Granular audio routing for hearing aids: Android 17 allows users to independently manage where specific system sounds are played. They can choose to route notifications, ringtones, and alarms to connected hearing aids or the device's built-in speaker, helping to avoid unwanted in-ear interruptions while maintaining a Bluetooth connection for hearing aid management apps.</li>
</ul>

<h2>CameraX and  Media3</h2>
<p><a href="https://developer.android.com/jetpack/androidx/releases/camerax">CameraX</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/jetpack/androidx/releases/media3">Media3</a> have been updated for Android 17. They are there to do the heavy lifting, smoothing the rough edges of media development and simplifying building reliable camera capture,  smooth media playback, and creative and complex editing experiences. </p>

<p>We've released an <a href="https://github.com/android/skills/tree/main/camera">agent skill</a> that can migrate legacy Android camera implementations (Camera1 or raw Camera2 APIs) to CameraX.</p>
  
<p>Note: You'll need to update your CameraX version to either 1.5.2 or 1.6.0+ to avoid a crash related to an added dynamic range mode on Android 17 devices.</p>

<h3>Get your apps, libraries, tools, and game engines ready!</h3>
<p>If you develop an Android SDK, library, tool, or game engine, it's critical to prepare any necessary updates now to prevent your downstream app and game developers from being blocked by compatibility issues and allow them to target the latest SDK features. Please let your downstream developers know if updates are needed to fully support Android 17.</p>

<p>Testing involves installing your production app or a test app making use of your library or engine using Google Play or other means onto a device or emulator running Android 17 Beta 4. Work through all your app's flows and look for functional or UI issues. Each release of Android contains platform changes that improve privacy, security, and overall user experience; review the app impacting behavior changes for apps <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-all">running on</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-17">targeting</a> Android 17 to focus your testing, including the following:</p>
<ul>
  <li>Resizability on large screens: Once you target Android 17 (SDK 37), you can no longer opt out of maintaining orientation, resizability and aspect ratio constraints <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/changes/ff-restrictions-ignored">on large screens</a>.</li>
  <li>Dynamic code loading: If your app targets SDK 37 or higher, the Safer Dynamic Code Loading (DCL) protection <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/14/behavior-changes-14#safer-dynamic-code-loading">introduced in Android 14 </a>for DEX and JAR files now extends to native libraries. All native files loaded using System.load() must be marked as read-only. Otherwise, the system throws UnsatisfiedLinkError.</li>
  <li>Enable CT by default: <a href="https://developer.android.com/privacy-and-security/security-config#CertificateTransparencySummary">Certificate transparency (CT)</a> is enabled by default. (On Android 16, CT is available but apps had to <a href="https://developer.android.com/privacy-and-security/security-config#certificateTransparency">opt in</a>.)</li>
  <li>Local network protections: Apps targeting SDK 37 or higher have <a href="https://developer.android.com/privacy-and-security/local-network-permission#android-17-enforcement">local network access blocked by default</a>. Switch to using privacy preserving pickers if possible, and use the new <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/Manifest.permission#access_local_network"><b><code>ACCESS_LOCAL_NETWORK</code></b>permission for broad, persistent access.</a></li>
  <li>Background audio hardening: Starting in Android 17, the audio framework enforces <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/changes/bg-audio">restrictions on background audio interactions</a> including audio playback, <a href="https://developer.android.com/media/optimize/audio-focus">audio focus</a> requests, and <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/AudioManager#adjustStreamVolume(int,%20int,%20int)">volume change</a> APIs. Based on your feedback, we’ve made some changes since beta 2, including targetSDK gating while-in-use FGS enforcement and exempting alarm audio. Full details available in the <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/changes/bg-audio">updated guidance</a>.</li>
  <li>NPU access declaration: Apps targeting Android 17 that need to directly access the NPU must declare <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/android/content/pm/PackageManager#feature_neural_processing_unit">FEATURE_NEURAL_PROCESSING_UNIT</a> in their manifest to avoid being blocked from accessing the NPU. This includes apps that use the <a href="https://ai.google.dev/edge/litert/next/npu">LiteRT NPU delegate</a>, vendor-specific SDKs, as well as the deprecated <a href="https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/neuralnetworks">NNAPI</a>.</li>
</ul>

<h3>Get started with Android 17</h3>
<p>Your Pixel device should get Android 17 shortly if you haven't already been on the Android Beta. If you don’t have a Pixel device, you can <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/get#on_emulator">use the 64-bit system images with the Android Emulator</a> in Android Studio. If you are currently on Android 17 Beta 4.1 and have not yet taken an Android 17 QPR1 beta, you can opt out of the program and you will then be offered the release version of Android 17 over the air.</p>
<h3>Getting the Android 17 beta on partner devices</h3>
<p>Android 17 is available in beta on handset, tablet, and foldable form factors <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/devices">from partners</a> including Honor, iQOO, Lenovo, OnePlus, OPPO, Realme, Sharp, vivo, and Xiaomi.</p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjy5cwRcpdR2j-1KMzQPpsxvIODRLlVkaFNQEIQoNaPQa4X4rgEna5imminlwFdcSJ3xihXdUSFouOC0-ZKyK1A53cBmoaU03au-FjfsqkPXm0tPLtOaWT_7z8tqnMmQjFOr-YIKeP3BMVq8Hmd7yH0zllW1aFMuiW6AAAcDUVL7aIyCAIZUs0d_0VMdF4/s1653/android-17-beta-partners.jpg"><img border="0" data-original-height="624" data-original-width="1653" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjy5cwRcpdR2j-1KMzQPpsxvIODRLlVkaFNQEIQoNaPQa4X4rgEna5imminlwFdcSJ3xihXdUSFouOC0-ZKyK1A53cBmoaU03au-FjfsqkPXm0tPLtOaWT_7z8tqnMmQjFOr-YIKeP3BMVq8Hmd7yH0zllW1aFMuiW6AAAcDUVL7aIyCAIZUs0d_0VMdF4/s16000/android-17-beta-partners.jpg"></a></div><br><h3><br></h3>

<p>For the best development experience with Android 17, we recommend that you use the latest Canary build of <a href="https://developer.android.com/studio/preview">Android Studio Quail</a>. Once you’re set up, here are some of the things you should do:</p>
<p>Test your current app for compatibility, learn whether your app is <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17/behavior-changes-all">affected by changes in Android 17</a>, and install your app onto a device or <a href="https://developer.android.com/studio/run/emulator">Android Emulator</a> running Android 17 and extensively test it.</p>

<p>Thank you again to everyone who participated in our Android developer preview and beta program. We're looking forward to seeing how your apps take advantage of the updates in Android 17, and have plans to bring you updates in a fast-paced release cadence going forward.</p>
<p>For complete information on Android 17 please visit the <a href="https://developer.android.com/about/versions/17">Android 17 developer site</a>.</p><br><br>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Optimize your apps for the next generation of Samsung Galaxy devices]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by Fahd Imtiaz, Senior Product Manager and Miguel Montemayor, Developer Relations Engineer, Android Developer ExperienceToday at Galaxy Unpacked, Samsung unveiled its latest lineup of foldable and wearable devices. For developers, this means that the variety of form factors, screen sizes, ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693491/android-tipps/optimize-your-apps-for-the-next-generation-of-samsung-galaxy-devices/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693491/android-tipps/optimize-your-apps-for-the-next-generation-of-samsung-galaxy-devices/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiV-c747avSj9Z8JO4DTK4kSfO3SjSpd5aTuVvR_TBeD3bXV6cc8lzNLGrWCngNXdyZBeiNjQqwQZCcU4QCrovwL99gu0t5bQrlTXa0PIBGIivwyS8y226MgeraphZr4VITWYe0x7ckFto0dsD8rBLM1J_P3dV0CBj5Ctlwm8jsgAPZA7W2XnKnRz59H9I/s2049/MM_Adaptive_and_device_Meta%20(1).png"><div>



<div><div class="separator"><i>Posted by Fahd Imtiaz, Senior Product Manager and Miguel Montemayor, Developer Relations Engineer, Android Developer Experience</i></div></div><div><i><br></i></div><div><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgGrEplk_My1fOfyw851kt92Jc2wyODN6bwWJaL5EGFV6_5grP3-pS7jrMzI4MOXgo1W1yVHcwj8J7AIO3olxlHDoNWxzTTlQLc9_D6CWB6bUtWLyvxmXN-JQQ92_HWYErsdMVuNkynTjXpZSKoaUTFiY_4aiffEDsfdCrl9om05MRVqqMac0YGExE4XLQ/s4210/MM_Adaptive_and_device_Blog.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="1254" data-original-width="4210" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgGrEplk_My1fOfyw851kt92Jc2wyODN6bwWJaL5EGFV6_5grP3-pS7jrMzI4MOXgo1W1yVHcwj8J7AIO3olxlHDoNWxzTTlQLc9_D6CWB6bUtWLyvxmXN-JQQ92_HWYErsdMVuNkynTjXpZSKoaUTFiY_4aiffEDsfdCrl9om05MRVqqMac0YGExE4XLQ/s1600/MM_Adaptive_and_device_Blog.png"></a></div><br><i><br></i><p>Today at Galaxy Unpacked, Samsung <a href="https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/platforms/android/galaxy-unpacked-2026" target="_blank">unveiled</a> its latest lineup of foldable and wearable devices. For developers, this means that the variety of form factors, screen sizes, and device postures your app needs to support is expanding once again.</p>

<p>With devices like the Galaxy Z Fold8, the ecosystem is expanding to include hardware with a landscape-first natural orientation and a wider aspect ratio in its main display state. Whether a user is unfolding a large display, flipping open a cover screen, or glancing at their wrist, users expect a flawless experience. To help you meet this moment, we’re sharing actionable guidance and new tooling updates to enable you to build adaptively proactively.</p>

<div class="separator">
  </div>

<h2>Rethink layout architecture for dynamic displays, including ultra-wide foldables</h2>

<p>Building for the latest foldables means dropping assumptions about display orientation and size. This is especially true for the Galaxy Z Fold8, which adopts an ultra-wide display, adding to the variety of aspect ratios to account for.  Devices with this landscape-first natural orientation show the limitations of hardcoded layout rules when users unfold the device. That’s why we’ve introduced <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/adaptive-apps/guides/foldables/trifolds-and-landscape-foldables" target="_blank">dedicated guidance for building for landscape foldables and trifolds.</a></p><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrdDMq9mmhR2NzEVD5cgQgT3Y5DgMZOV5FrjsJb-wSiZVvJjIiDQuUkfv0cjBHQMREjOKPqz9n6wPf-x5Hn6H7uT2_JiXA3Nykcr1UwnwDRK9jGFurhTRKR-5t1BN62ISXFznXhQ_e-03Mo6uIh5-BDVmNbA1Q4RY9rSg4VxBO0K6E6Dc4kViNpvuYefY/s1302/Samsung%20fold8%20phones.png"><img border="0" data-original-height="442" data-original-width="1302" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjrdDMq9mmhR2NzEVD5cgQgT3Y5DgMZOV5FrjsJb-wSiZVvJjIiDQuUkfv0cjBHQMREjOKPqz9n6wPf-x5Hn6H7uT2_JiXA3Nykcr1UwnwDRK9jGFurhTRKR-5t1BN62ISXFznXhQ_e-03Mo6uIh5-BDVmNbA1Q4RY9rSg4VxBO0K6E6Dc4kViNpvuYefY/s1600/Samsung%20fold8%20phones.png"></a></div><br><p>To build a responsive UI that handles these physics seamlessly, focus on the following core pillars:</p>

<p></p><ul><li><b>Build fluid, adaptive layouts: </b>Wide aspect ratios and compact vertical heights require fluid UIs that scale responsively. Our updated <a href="https://developer.android.com/design/ui/mobile/guides/layout-and-content/adapt-layout" target="_blank">adaptive design guidance</a> advises considering the window class width first to determine layout changes, then adjusting for height. To let individual components fluidly adapt to the grid, structure your layout using flexible containers that allow your content to automatically wrap, span, and reflow. For design inspiration browse our <a href="https://developer.android.com/design/ui/gallery/social/pawparazzi" target="_blank">adaptive sample app</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/design/ui/gallery/social/dual-screen?hl=en" target="_blank">dual-screen</a> design galleries.</li><li><b>Track actual app space:</b> Your app's display space rarely matches the physical device size, especially on an ultra-wide screen during multi-window, split-screen, or multitasking states. Sometimes even the orientations differ. Leverage <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/adaptive-apps/guides/use-window-size-classes?hl=en" target="_blank">Window Size Classes</a> using the <a href="https://developer.android.com/blog/posts/jetpack-window-manager-1-5-is-stable" target="_blank">Jetpack Window Manager library</a> to calculate the exact space your app occupies.</li></ul><div><br></div>
  
<div class="separator">
  </div></div><div class="separator"><br></div><div class="separator"><div class="separator"><ul><li><b>Leverage the latest Jetpack Compose Update: </b>Start by adopting the stable <a href="https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2026/04/jetpack-compose-april-2026-updates.html" target="_blank">Jetpack Compose April '26 release</a> (<a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/bom" target="_blank">Compose BOM</a> version <code>2026.04.01</code>).Take advantage of the new structural layout tools to manage complex architectures. The new <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/layouts/adaptive/grid" target="_blank">Grid</a> API allows you to define dynamic tracks and column spans without the performance overhead of a lazy list. Pair Grid with the new <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/layouts/adaptive/flexbox" target="_blank">FlexBox</a> layout API to easily handle multi-axis alignment and dynamic item wrapping. You can also use the new <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/ui/compose/layouts/adaptive/mediaquery" target="_blank">MediaQuery</a> API to adapt your UI to its environment, using conditions to detect signals like device posture, window size, and keyboard types. </li><li><b>Make your app fold aware: </b>Use the Jetpack WindowManager library, which provides an API surface for foldable device window features such as folds and hinges. When your app is<a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/adaptive-apps/guides/foldables/make-your-app-fold-aware" target="_blank"> fold aware</a>, it can adapt its layout to avoid placing important content in the area of folds or hinges and use folds and hinges as natural separators.</li><li><b>Maintain app continuity:</b> Avoid breaking the user journey when the device configuration shifts. Retain your UI state using <a href="https://developer.android.com/topic/libraries/architecture/viewmodel?hl=en" target="_blank">ViewModel</a> to ensure smooth transitions when a user folds or unfolds their device.</li></ul><div class="separator"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjdxp09YbiUc9EzTGhIJ2fcoV67rLKb6Sm9UOVCISO4Xa0VVVnFUJG9PXSAYCq7gnHILLx8xoIx-L2C0blhugbADUa3nM0AOx8UQzGImu194B94Kt-CKAuK1CrGHUz10fBFs02Lmly-HO-fmBHFuZ9knuYRb6EP9v4-SpR7Ja-oeJZErJDUVEgEje0d7J8/s1920/7.22_MorphToTablet_Gif.gif"><img border="0" data-original-height="1080" data-original-width="1920" height="360" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjdxp09YbiUc9EzTGhIJ2fcoV67rLKb6Sm9UOVCISO4Xa0VVVnFUJG9PXSAYCq7gnHILLx8xoIx-L2C0blhugbADUa3nM0AOx8UQzGImu194B94Kt-CKAuK1CrGHUz10fBFs02Lmly-HO-fmBHFuZ9knuYRb6EP9v4-SpR7Ja-oeJZErJDUVEgEje0d7J8/w640-h360/7.22_MorphToTablet_Gif.gif" width="640"></a></div><div><h2>Ensure seamless camera capture on foldable devices</h2><div>Camera implementation on foldables brings unique hardware quirks. Moving from a compact outer display to an expanded inner display introduces distinct layout aspect ratios while device rotation remains unchanged. If an app assumes a fixed portrait relationship between the camera sensor and the device layout, the app will likely suffer from sideways, stretched, or cropped previews during these folding transitions.</div><div> </div><div>When optimizing your app's media pipeline, migrate your capture experiences to <a href="https://developer.android.com/media/camera/camerax" target="_blank">CameraX</a> using the CameraX migration <a href="https://github.com/android/skills/blob/main/camera/camerax/SKILL.md">skill</a>. The library’s <a href="https://developer.android.com/reference/kotlin/androidx/camera/view/PreviewView" target="_blank">PreviewView</a> automatically handles sensor orientation, device rotation, and scaling behind the scenes. This guarantees a clean, stable preview regardless of how the user holds or positions the device. If you are maintaining an existing Camera2 codebase, integrate the <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/adaptive-apps/guides/foldables/trifolds-and-landscape-foldables#solution_2_cameraviewfinder" target="_blank">CameraViewfinder</a> library to apply these complex aspect ratio and rotation transformations automatically without needing a total architecture overhaul.</div></div><h2>Extend glanceable interactions to Wear OS 7</h2><div>The opportunity to build for this new generation of devices extends right to the wrist. Launching with Wear OS 7, Wear Widgets give you a fresh surface to provide users with instant, glanceable access to their essential updates. You can build these highly expressive experiences using <a href="https://developer.android.com/jetpack/androidx/releases/glance-wear" target="_blank">Jetpack Glance</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/jetpack/androidx/releases/compose-remote" target="_blank">RemoteCompose</a>. Crucially, Widgets built with this framework can now populate multi-widget tiles that were previously reserved for first-party widgets. </div><div><br></div>
    
 <div class="separator">
  </div><div class="separator"><h2>Build intelligent features </h2><div class="separator"><a href="https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/platforms/android/gemini-intelligence/" target="_blank">Gemini intelligence </a>already completes tasks on users’ behalf, and you can <a href="https://developer.android.com/ai/appfunctions?_gl=1*1jms098*_up*MQ..*_ga*MjY0OTY0MDI3LjE3ODQzMzI1NDk.*_ga_6HH9YJMN9M*czE3ODQzMzI1NDkkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODQzMzI1NDkkajYwJGwwJGgxNjE0MTMzNjEz" target="_blank">experiment</a> with the intelligence system by sharing your apps capabilities. </div><div class="separator"><br></div><div class="separator">Samsung’s new foldable devices come with Gemini Nano 4, our latest on-device model. Nano 4 provides support for over 140 languages, better multimodal understanding, and <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/release-notes#july_14_2026" target="_blank">much more</a>. Use <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/prompt/android" target="_blank">ML Kit’s Prompt API</a> with advanced features like s<a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/prompt/android/structured-output" target="_blank">tructured output</a> and <a href="https://developers.google.com/ml-kit/genai/prompt/android/thinking-mode" target="_blank">thinking mode</a> to build intelligent features on-device. </div><div class="separator"><h2>Start optimizing today</h2><div class="separator">The tools and frameworks are ready to help you optimize your app for all screen sizes. Begin by exploring our guidance for <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/adaptive-apps" target="_blank">building adaptive apps </a>to learn more about core adaptive design principles. </div><div class="separator"><br></div><div class="separator">To dive deeper, check out our comprehensive <a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLD2U7gd1-ieo" target="_blank">YouTube playlist</a>. Finally, ensure your app delivers a flawless, premium experience on the newest form factors by reviewing our dedicated quality guidelines for <a href="https://developer.android.com/develop/adaptive-apps/guides/foldables/trifolds-and-landscape-foldables" target="_blank">trifolds and landscape foldables</a> and <a href="https://developer.android.com/design/ui/wear/guides/get-started?hl=en" target="_blank">WearOS</a>. </div><div class="separator"><br></div><div class="separator">Unfold the future today! </div></div></div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Pro-Russia Hacktivists Conduct Opportunistic Attacks Against US and Global Critical Infrastructure]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Summary
Note: This joint Cybersecurity Advisory is being published as an addition to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) May 6, 2025, joint fact sheet Primary Mitigations to Reduce Cyber Threats to Operational Technology and European Cybercrime Centre’s (EC3) Operation Eas...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693383/sicherheitsluecken/pro-russia-hacktivists-conduct-opportunistic-attacks-against-us-and-global-critical-infrastructure/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693383/sicherheitsluecken/pro-russia-hacktivists-conduct-opportunistic-attacks-against-us-and-global-critical-infrastructure/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 09:15:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><strong>Summary</strong></h2>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> This joint Cybersecurity Advisory is being published as an addition to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) May 6, 2025, joint fact sheet <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/primary-mitigations-reduce-cyber-threats-operational-technology" title="Primary Mitigations to Reduce Cyber Threats to Operational Technology">Primary Mitigations to Reduce Cyber Threats to Operational Technology</a> and European Cybercrime Centre’s (EC3) <a href="https://www.europol.europa.eu/media-press/newsroom/news/global-operation-targets-noname05716-pro-russian-cybercrime-network" target="_blank" title="Operation Eastwood" data-entity-type="external">Operation Eastwood</a>, in which CISA, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Department of Energy (DOE), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and EC3 shared information about cyber incidents affecting the operational technology (OT) and industrial control systems (ICS) of critical infrastructure entities in the United States and globally.</p>
<p>FBI, CISA, National Security Agency (NSA), and the following partners—hereafter referred to as “the authoring organizations”—are releasing this joint advisory on the targeting of critical infrastructure by pro-Russia hacktivists:</p>
<ul>
<li>U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)</li>
<li>U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)</li>
<li>U.S. Department of Defense Cyber Crime Center (DC3)</li>
<li>Europol European Cybercrime Centre (EC3)</li>
<li>EUROJUST – European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation</li>
<li>Australian Signals Directorate’s Australian Cyber Security Centre (ASD’s ACSC)</li>
<li>Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (Cyber Centre)</li>
<li>Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS)</li>
<li>Czech Republic Military Intelligence (VZ)</li>
<li>Czech Republic National Cyber and Information Security Agency (NÚKIB)</li>
<li>Czech Republic National Centre Against Terrorism, Extremism, and Cyber Crime (NCTEKK)</li>
<li>French National Cybercrime Unit – Gendarmerie Nationale (UNC)</li>
<li>French National Jurisdiction for the Fight Against Organized Crime (JUNALCO)</li>
<li>German Federal Office for Information Security (BSI)</li>
<li>Italian State Police (PS)</li>
<li>Latvian State Police (VP)</li>
<li>Lithuanian Criminal Police Bureau (LKPB)</li>
<li>New Zealand National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-NZ)</li>
<li>Romanian National Police (PR)</li>
<li>Spanish Civil Guard (GC)</li>
<li>Spanish National Police (CNP)</li>
<li>Swedish Polisen (SC3)</li>
<li>United Kingdom National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-UK)</li>
</ul>
<p>The authoring organizations assess pro-Russia hacktivist groups are conducting less sophisticated, lower-impact attacks against critical infrastructure entities, compared to advanced persistent threat (APT) groups. These attacks use minimally secured, internet-facing virtual network computing (VNC) connections to infiltrate (or gain access to) OT control devices within critical infrastructure systems. Pro-Russia hacktivist groups—Cyber Army of Russia Reborn (CARR), Z-Pentest, NoName057(16), Sector16, and affiliated groups—are capitalizing on the widespread prevalence of accessible VNC devices to execute attacks against critical infrastructure entities, resulting in varying degrees of impact, including physical damage. Targeted sectors include <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/water-and-wastewater-sector" title="Water and Wastewater Systems">Water and Wastewater Systems</a>, <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/food-and-agriculture-sector" title="Food and Agriculture Sector">Food and Agriculture</a>, and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/energy-sector" title="Energy Sector">Energy</a>.</p>
<p>The authoring organizations encourage critical infrastructure organizations to implement the recommendations in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Mitigations" title="Mitigations"><strong>Mitigations </strong></a>section of this advisory to reduce the likelihood and impact of pro-Russia hacktivist-related incidents. For additional information on Russian state-sponsored malicious cyber activity, see CISA’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/cyber-threats-and-advisories/advanced-persistent-threats/russia" title="Russia Threat Overview and Advisories">Russia Threat Overview and Advisories</a> webpage.</p>
<p>Download the PDF version of this report:</p>





<div class="c-file">
    <div class="c-file__download">
    <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2025-12/aa25-343a-pro-russia-hacktivists-conduct-attacks_0.pdf" class="c-file__link" target="_blank">Pro-Russia Hacktivists Conduct Opportunistic Attacks Against US and Global Critical Infrastructure</a>
    <span class="c-file__size">(PDF,       1.53 MB
  )</span>
  </div>
</div>
<h2><strong>Background and Development of Pro-Russia Hacktivist Groups</strong></h2>
<p>Over the past several years, the authoring organizations have observed pro-Russia hacktivist groups conducting cyber operations against numerous organizations and critical infrastructure sectors worldwide. The escalation of the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 2022 significantly increased the number of these pro-Russia groups. Consisting of individuals who support Russia’s agenda but lack direct governmental ties, most of these groups target Ukrainian and allied infrastructure. However, among the increasing number of groups, some appear to have associations with the Russian state through direct or indirect support.</p>
<h3><strong>Cyber Army of Russia Reborn</strong></h3>
<p>The authoring organizations assess that the Russian General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) Main Center for Special Technologies (GTsST) military unit 74455—tracked in the cybersecurity community under several names (see<strong> </strong><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#AppB" title="Appendix B"><strong>Appendix B: Additional Designators Used for Cited Groups</strong></a>)—is likely responsible for supporting the creation of CARR —also known as “The People’s Cyber Army of Russia”—in late February or early March of 2022. Actors suspected to be from GRU unit 74455 likely funded the tools CARR threat actors used to conduct distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks through at least September 2024.</p>
<p>In April 2022, the group began using a new Telegram channel featuring the name “CyberArmyofRussia_Reborn” to organize and plan group actions. The channel creators recruited actors to use CARR as an unattributable platform for conducting cyber activities beneath the level of an APT, aimed at deterring anti-Russia rhetoric. CARR threat actors presented themselves as a group of pro-Russia hacktivists supporting Russia’s stance on the Ukrainian conflict, and they soon began claiming responsibility for DDoS attacks against the U.S. and Europe for supporting Ukraine.</p>
<p>CARR documented these actions through embellished images and videos shared on their social media channels, promoting Russian ideology, disseminating talking points, and publicizing leaked information from hacks attributed to Russian state threat actors.</p>
<p>In late 2023, CARR expanded their operations to include attacks on industrial control systems (ICS), claiming an intrusion against a European wastewater treatment facility in October 2023. In November 2023, CARR targeted human-machine interface (HMI) devices, claiming intrusions at two U.S. dairy farms.</p>
<p>The authoring organizations assess that by late September 2024, CARR channel administrators became dissatisfied with the level of support and funding provided by the GRU. This dissatisfaction led CARR administrators and an administrator from another hacktivist group, NoName057(16), to create the Z-Pentest group, employing the same tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) as CARR but separate from GRU involvement.</p>
<h3><strong>NoName057(16)</strong></h3>
<p>The authoring organizations assess that the Center for the Study and Network Monitoring of the Youth Environment (CISM), established on behalf of the Kremlin, created NoName057(16) as a covert project within the organization. Senior executives and employees within CISM developed and customized the NoName057(16) proprietary DDoS tool <code>DDoSia</code>, paid for the group’s network infrastructure, served as administrators on NoName057(16) Telegram channels, and selected DDoS targets.</p>
<p>Active since March 2022, NoName057(16) has conducted frequent DDoS attacks against government and private sector entities in North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member states and other European countries perceived as hostile to Russian geopolitical interests. The group operates primarily through Telegram channels and used GitHub, alongside various websites and repositories, to host <code>DDoSia</code> and share materials and TTPs with their followers. </p>
<p>In 2024, NoName057(16) began collaborating closely with other pro-Russia hacktivist groups, operating a joint chat with CARR by mid-2024. In July 2024, NoName057(16) jointly claimed responsibility with CARR for an alleged intrusion against OT assets in the U.S. The high degree of cooperation with CARR likely contributed to the formation of Z-Pentest, which is composed of actors and administrators from both teams, in September 2024.</p>
<h3><strong>Z-Pentest</strong></h3>
<p>Established in September 2024, Z-Pentest is composed of members from CARR and NoName057(16). The group specializes in OT intrusion operations targeting globally dispersed critical infrastructure entities. Additionally, the group uses “hack and leak” operations and defacement attacks to draw attention to their pro-Russia messaging. Unlike other pro-Russia hacktivist groups, Z-Pentest largely avoids DDoS activities, claiming OT intrusions as attempts to garner more attention from the media.</p>
<p>Shortly after Z-Pentest’s inception, the group announced alliances with CARR and NoName057(16), possibly to leverage the other groups’ subscribers to grow the new channel. In March 2025, Z-Pentest posted evidence claiming OT device intrusions to their channel using a NoName057(16) cyberattack campaign hashtag. Similarly, in April 2025, Z-Pentest shared a video purporting defacement of an HMI by changing system names to NoName057(16) and CARR references. Z-Pentest continues to create new alliances with other groups, like Sector16, to continue growing their subscriber base and incidentally propagate TTPs with new partners.</p>
<h3><strong>Sector16</strong></h3>
<p>Formed in January 2025, Sector16 is a novice pro-Russia hacktivist group that emerged through collaboration with Z-Pentest. Sector16 actively maintains an online presence, including a public Telegram channel where they share videos, statements, and claims of compromising U.S. energy infrastructure. These communications often align with pro-Russia narratives and reflect their self-proclaimed support for Russian geopolitical objectives.</p>
<p>Members of Sector16 may have received indirect support from the Russian government in exchange for conducting specific cyber operations that further Russian strategic goals. This aligns with broader Russian cyber strategies that involve leveraging non-state threat actors for certain cyber activities, adding a layer of deniability.</p>
<h2><strong>Technical Details</strong></h2>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> This advisory uses the MITRE ATT&amp;CK<sup>®</sup> <a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/matrices/enterprise/" title="Matrix for Enterprise framework" data-entity-type="external">Matrix for Enterprise framework</a>, version 18. See the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#MITRE" title="MITRE ATT&amp;CK Tactics and Techniques"><strong>MITRE ATT&amp;CK Tactics and Techniques</strong></a> section of this advisory for a table of the threat actors’ activity mapped to MITRE ATT&amp;CK tactics and techniques.</p>
<h3><strong>TTP Overview</strong></h3>
<p>Pro-Russia hacktivist groups employ easily disseminated and replicated TTPs across various entities, increasing the likelihood of widespread adoption and escalating the frequency of intrusions. These groups have limited capabilities, frequently misunderstanding the processes they aim to disrupt. Their apparent low level of technical knowledge results in haphazard attacks where actors intend to cause physical damage but cannot accurately anticipate actual impact. Despite these limitations, the authoring organizations have observed these groups willfully cause actual harm to vulnerable critical infrastructure.</p>
<p>Pro-Russia hacktivist groups use the TTPs in this Cybersecurity Advisory to target virtual network computing (VNC)-connected HMI devices. These groups are primarily seeking notoriety with their actions. While they have caused damage in some instances, they regularly make false or exaggerated claims about their attacks on critical infrastructure to garner more attention. They frequently misrepresent their capabilities and the impacts of their actions, portraying minor incursions as significant breaches, but such incursions can still lead to lost time and resources for operators remediating systems.</p>
<p>Additionally, pro-Russia hacktivists use an opportunistic targeting methodology. They leverage superficial criteria, such as victim availability and existing vulnerabilities, rather than focusing on strategically significant entities. Their lack of strategic focus can lead to a broad array of targets, ranging from water treatment facilities to oil well systems. Pro-Russia hacktivists have demonstrated a pattern of frequently taking advantage of the widespread availability of vulnerable VNC connections. While system owners typically use VNC connections for legitimate remote system access functions, threat actors can maliciously use these connections to broadly target numerous platforms and services. Consequently, these groups can indiscriminately compromise critical infrastructure entities, including those in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/water-and-wastewater-sector" title="Water and Wastewater Sector">Water and Wastewater</a>, <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/food-and-agriculture-sector" title="Food and Agriculture Sector" data-entity-type="external">Food and Agriculture</a>, and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/energy-sector" title="Energy Sector">Energy</a> Sectors.</p>
<p>Pro-Russia hacktivist groups have successfully targeted supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) networks using basic methods, and in some cases, performed simultaneous DDoS attacks against targeted networks to facilitate SCADA intrusions. As recently as April 2025, threat actors used the following unsophisticated TTPs to access networks and conduct SCADA intrusions:</p>
<ul>
<li>Scan for vulnerable devices on the internet [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0883/" target="_blank" title="T0883" data-entity-type="external">T0883</a>] with open VNC ports [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1595/002/" target="_blank" title="T1595.002" data-entity-type="external">T1595.002</a>].</li>
<li>Initiate temporary virtual private server (VPS) [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1583/003/" target="_blank" title="T1583.003" data-entity-type="external">T1583.003</a>] to execute password brute force software.</li>
<li>Use VNC software to access hosts [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1021/005/" target="_blank" title="T1021.005" data-entity-type="external">T1021.005</a>].</li>
<li>Confirm connection to the vulnerable device [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0886/" target="_blank" title="T0886" data-entity-type="external">T0886</a>].</li>
<li>Brute force the password, if required [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1110/003/" target="_blank" title="T1110.003" data-entity-type="external">T1110.003</a>].</li>
<li>Gain access to HMI devices [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0883/" target="_blank" title="T0883" data-entity-type="external">T0883</a>], typically with default [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0812/" target="_blank" title="T0812" data-entity-type="external">T0812</a>], weak, or no passwords [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0859/" target="_blank" title="T0859" data-entity-type="external">T0859</a>].</li>
<li>Log the confirmed vulnerable device IP address, port, and password.</li>
<li>Using the HMI graphical interface [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0823/" target="_blank" title="T0823" data-entity-type="external">T0823</a>], capture screen recordings or intermittent screenshots while conducting the following actions, intending to affect productivity and cause additional costs [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0828/" target="_blank" title="T0828" data-entity-type="external">T0828</a>]:
<ul>
<li>Modify usernames/passwords [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0892/" target="_blank" title="T0892" data-entity-type="external">T0892</a>];</li>
<li>Modify parameters [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0836/" target="_blank" title="T0836" data-entity-type="external">T0836</a>];</li>
<li>Modify device name [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0892/" target="_blank" title="T0892" data-entity-type="external">T0892</a>];</li>
<li>Modify instrument settings [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0831/" target="_blank" title="T0831" data-entity-type="external">T0831</a>];</li>
<li>Disable alarms [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0878/" target="_blank" title="T0878" data-entity-type="external">T0878</a>];</li>
<li>Create loss of view (a technique that mandates local hands-on operator intervention) [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0829/" target="_blank" title="T0829" data-entity-type="external">T0829</a>]; and/or</li>
<li>Device restart or shutdown [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0816/" target="_blank" title="T0816" data-entity-type="external">T0816</a>].</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Disconnect from the device, ending the VNC connection.</li>
<li>Research the compromised device company after the intrusion [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1591/" target="_blank" title="T1591" data-entity-type="external">T1591</a>].</li>
</ul>
<h4><strong>Propagation</strong></h4>
<p>To reach a wider audience, pro-Russia hacktivist groups work together, amplify each other’s posts, create additional groups to amplify their own posts, and likely share TTPs. For example, Z-Pentest jointly claimed intrusion of a U.S. system with Sector16. Sector16 later began posting additional intrusions for which the group claimed sole responsibility. It is likely that these and similar groups will continue to iterate and share these methods to disrupt critical infrastructure organizations.</p>
<h4><strong>Reconnaissance and Initial Access</strong></h4>
<p>The threat actors’ intrusion methodology is relatively unsophisticated, inexpensive to execute, and easy to replicate. These pro-Russia hacktivist groups abuse popular internet-scraping tools, such as <code>Nmap</code> or <code>OPENVAS</code>, to search for visible VNC services and use brute force password spraying tools to access devices via known default or otherwise weak credentials. Threat actors typically search for these services on the default port <code>5900</code> or other nearby ports (<code>5901-5910</code>). Their goal is to gain remote access to HMI devices connected to live control networks.</p>
<p>Once threat actors obtain access, they manipulate available settings from the graphical user interface (GUI) on the HMI devices, such as arbitrary physical parameter and setpoint changes, or conduct defacement activities. Because pro-Russia hacktivist groups seem to lack sector-specific expertise or cyber-physical engineering knowledge, they currently cannot reliably estimate the true impact of their actions. Regardless of outcome, pro-Russia hacktivist groups often post images and screen recordings to their social media platforms, boasting the compromises and exaggerating impacts to garner attention from their peers and the media.</p>
<h4><strong>Impact</strong></h4>
<p>While pro-Russia hacktivist groups currently demonstrate limited ability to consistently cause significant impact, there is a risk that their continued attacks will result in further harm or grievous physical consequences. Attacks have not yet caused injury; however, the attacks against occupied factories and community facilities demonstrate a lack of consideration for human safety.</p>
<p>Victim organizations reported that the most common operational impact caused by these threat actors is a temporary loss of view, necessitating manual intervention to manage processes. However, any modifications to programmatic and systematic procedures can result in damage or disruption, including substantial labor costs from hiring a programmable logic controller programmer to restore operations, costs associated with operational downtime, and potential costs for network remediation.</p>
<h2><a class="ck-anchor"><strong>MITRE ATT&amp;CK Tactics and Techniques</strong></a></h2>
<p>See <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Table1" title="Table 1"><strong>Table 1</strong></a> to <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Table10" title="Table 10"><strong>Table 10</strong></a> for all referenced threat actor tactics and techniques in this advisory. For assistance with mapping malicious cyber activity to the MITRE ATT&amp;CK framework, see CISA and MITRE ATT&amp;CK’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/news/best-practices-mitre-attckr-mapping" title="Best Practices for MITRE ATT&amp;CK Mapping">Best Practices for MITRE ATT&amp;CK Mapping</a> and CISA’s <a href="https://github.com/cisagov/Decider/" title="Decider Tool">Decider Tool</a>.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em>Table 1. Reconnaissance</em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist"><strong>Technique Title</strong></th>
<th role="columnheader"><strong>ID</strong></th>
<th role="columnheader"><strong>Use</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Gather Victim Organization Information</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1591/" target="_blank" title="T1591" data-entity-type="external">T1591</a></td>
<td>Threat actors use information available on the internet to determine what systems they believe they have compromised and post the information on their social media. This methodology frequently leads to the threat actors misidentifying their claimed victims.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Active Scanning: Vulnerability Scanning</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1595/002/" target="_blank" title="T1595.002" data-entity-type="external">T1595.002</a></td>
<td>Threat actors use open source tools to look for IP addresses in target countries with visible VNC services on common ports.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em>Table 2. Resource Development</em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist"><strong>Technique Title</strong></th>
<th role="columnheader"><strong>ID</strong></th>
<th role="columnheader"><strong>Use</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Acquire Infrastructure: Virtual Private Server</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1583/003/" target="_blank" title="T1583.003" data-entity-type="external">T1583.003</a></td>
<td>Threat actors use virtual infrastructure to obfuscate identifiers.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em>Table 3. Initial Access</em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist"><strong>Technique Title</strong></th>
<th role="columnheader"><strong>ID</strong></th>
<th role="columnheader"><strong>Use</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Internet Accessible Device</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0883/" target="_blank" title="T0883" data-entity-type="external">T0883</a></td>
<td>Threat actors gain access through less secure HMI devices exposed to the internet.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em>Table 4. Persistence</em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist"><strong>Technique Title</strong></th>
<th role="columnheader"><strong>ID</strong></th>
<th role="columnheader"><strong>Use</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Valid Accounts</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0859/" target="_blank" title="T0859" data-entity-type="external">T0859</a></td>
<td>Threat actors use password guessing tools to access legitimate accounts on the HMI devices.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em>Table 5. Credential Access</em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist"><strong>Technique Title</strong></th>
<th role="columnheader"><strong>ID</strong></th>
<th role="columnheader"><strong>Use</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Brute Force: Password Spraying</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1110/003/" target="_blank" title="T1110.003" data-entity-type="external">T1110.003</a></td>
<td>Threat actors use tools to rapidly guess common or simple passwords.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em>Table 6. Lateral Movement</em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist"><strong>Technique Title</strong></th>
<th role="columnheader"><strong>ID</strong></th>
<th role="columnheader"><strong>Use</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Default Credentials</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0812/" target="_blank" title="T0812" data-entity-type="external">T0812</a></td>
<td>Threat actors seek and build libraries of known default passwords for control devices to access legitimate user accounts.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Remote Services</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0886/" target="_blank" title="T0886" data-entity-type="external">T0886</a></td>
<td>Threat actors leverage VNC services to access system HMI devices.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Remote Services: VNC</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1021/005/" target="_blank" title="T1021.005" data-entity-type="external">T1021.005</a></td>
<td>Threat actors hunt VNC-enabled devices visible on the internet and connect with remote viewer software.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em>Table 7. Execution</em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist"><strong>Technique Title</strong></th>
<th role="columnheader"><strong>ID</strong></th>
<th role="columnheader"><strong>Use</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Graphical User Interface</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0823/" target="_blank" title="T0823" data-entity-type="external">T0823</a></td>
<td>Threat actors interact with HMI devices via GUIs, attempting to modify control devices.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em>Table 8. Inhibit Response Function</em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist"><strong>Technique Title</strong></th>
<th role="columnheader"><strong>ID</strong></th>
<th role="columnheader"><strong>Use</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Device Restart/Shutdown</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0816/" target="_blank" title="T0816" data-entity-type="external">T0816</a></td>
<td>While threat actors claim to turn off HMIs, it is possible that operators (not the threat actors) turn the devices off during incident response.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alarm Suppression</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0878/" target="_blank" title="T0878" data-entity-type="external">T0878</a></td>
<td>Threat actors use HMI interfaces to clear alarms caused by their activity and alarms already present on the system at the time of their intrusion.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Change Credential</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0892/" target="_blank" title="T0892" data-entity-type="external">T0892</a></td>
<td>Threat actors change the usernames and passwords of HMI devices in operator lockout attempts, usually resulting in a loss of view and operators switching to manual operations.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em>Table 9. Impair Process Control</em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">Technique Title</th>
<th role="columnheader">ID</th>
<th role="columnheader">Use</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Modify Parameter</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0836/" target="_blank" title="T0836" data-entity-type="external">T0836</a></td>
<td>Threat actors attempt to change upper and lower limits of operational devices as available from the HMI.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Unauthorized Command Message</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T0855/" target="_blank" title="T0855" data-entity-type="external">T0855</a></td>
<td>Threat actors attempt to send unauthorized command messages to instruct control system assets to perform actions outside of their intended functionality, causing possible impact.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em>Table 10. Impact</em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist"><a class="ck-anchor"><strong>Technique Title</strong></a></th>
<th role="columnheader"><strong>ID</strong></th>
<th role="columnheader"><strong>Use</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Loss of Productivity and Revenue</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T0828/" target="_blank" title="T0828" data-entity-type="external">T0828</a></td>
<td>Threat actors purposefully attempt to impact productivity and create additional costs for the affected entities.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Loss of View</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v15/techniques/T0829/" target="_blank" title="T0829" data-entity-type="external">T0829</a></td>
<td>Threat actors change credentials on HMI devices, preventing operators from modifying processes remotely. </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Manipulation of Control</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v15/techniques/T0831/" target="_blank" title="T0831" data-entity-type="external">T0831</a></td>
<td>Threat actors change setpoints in processes, impacting the efficiency of operations for those specific processes.  </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2><strong>Incident Response</strong></h2>
<p>If organizations find exposed systems with weak or default passwords, they should assume threat actors compromised the system and begin the following incident response protocols:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Determine which hosts were compromised and isolate them</strong> by quarantining or taking them offline.</li>
<li><strong>Initiate threat hunting activities to scope the intrusion</strong>. Collect and review artifacts, such as running processes/services, unusual authentications, and recent network connections.</li>
<li><strong>Reimage compromised hosts</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>Provision new account credentials</strong>.</li>
<li><strong>Report the compromise to CISA, FBI, and/or NSA</strong>. See the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Contact" title="Contact Information"><strong>Contact Information</strong></a> section of this advisory.</li>
<li><strong>Harden the network to prevent additional malicious activity</strong>. See the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Mitigations" title="Mitigations "><strong>Mitigations </strong></a>section of this advisory for guidance.</li>
</ol>
<h2><a class="ck-anchor"><strong>Mitigations</strong></a></h2>
<h3><strong>OT Asset Owners and Operators</strong></h3>
<p>The authoring organizations recommend organizations implement the mitigations below to improve your organization’s cybersecurity posture based on the threat actors’ activity. These mitigations align with the Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPGs) developed by CISA and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The CPGs provide a minimum set of practices and protections that CISA and NIST recommend all organizations implement. CISA and NIST based the CPGs on existing cybersecurity frameworks and guidance to protect against the most common and impactful threats, tactics, techniques, and procedures. Visit CISA’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cross-sector-cybersecurity-performance-goals" title="CPGs">CPGs webpage</a> for more information on the CPGs, including additional recommended baseline protections.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Reduce exposure of OT assets to the public-facing internet.</strong> When connected to the internet, OT devices are easy targets for malicious cyber threat actors. Many devices can be found by searching for open ports on public IP ranges with search engine tools to target victims with OT components [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#SecureInternetFacingDevices3S" title="CPG 3.S">CPG 3.S</a>].
<ul>
<li><strong>Asset owners should use attack surface management services </strong>and web-based search platforms to scan the internet. This mitigation can help identify if there are VNC systems exposed within the IP ranges they own, especially for connections set up by third parties.<br><strong>Note:</strong> For more information on attack surface management, see CISA’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/exposure-reduction" title="Internet Exposure Reduction Guidance">Internet Exposure Reduction Guidance</a>, CISA’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cyber-hygiene-services" title="Cyber Hygiene Services">Cyber Hygiene Services</a> for U.S. critical infrastructure, and NSA’s <a href="https://www.nsa.gov/Portals/75/documents/resources/everyone/Attack%20Surface%20Management%20copy.pdf" target="_blank" title="Attack Surface Management" data-entity-type="external">Attack Surface Management</a> for the U.S. Defense Industrial Base.</li>
<li><strong>Implement network segmentation between IT and OT networks.</strong> Segmenting critical systems and introducing a demilitarized zone (DMZ) for passing control data to enterprise logistics reduces the potential impact of cyber threats and the risk of disruptions to essential OT operations [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#ImplementLogicalPhysicalNetworkSegmentation3I" title="CPG 3.I">CPG 3.I</a>].</li>
<li><strong>Consider implementing a firewall and/or virtual private network</strong> if exposure to the internet is necessary for controlling access to devices.
<ul>
<li>Consider disabling public exposure by default and implementing time-limited remote access to reduce the amount of time systems are exposed.</li>
<li>Restrict and monitor both inbound and outbound traffic at OT perimeter firewalls. Configure OT perimeter firewalls to enforce a default-deny policy for all traffic. Asset owners should explicitly permit authorized destinations and protocols based on operational requirements.</li>
<li>Implement strict egress filtering to prevent unauthorized data exfiltration or command-and-control callbacks.</li>
<li>Regularly audit firewall rulesets and monitor outbound traffic patterns for anomalies indicative of threat actor activity, such as beaconing or unexpected protocol usage.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Adopt mature asset management processes</strong>, including mapping data flows and access points. Generating a complete picture of both OT and IT assets provides visibility to operators and management, allowing organizations to monitor and assess deviations for criticality [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#ManageOrganizationalAssets2A" title="CPG 2.A">CPG 2.A</a>].
<ul>
<li><strong>Keep remote access services updated </strong>with the latest version available and ensure all systems and software are up to date with patches and necessary security updates.
<ul>
<li>Keep VNC systems updated with the latest version available.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Refer to the joint </strong><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/foundations-ot-cybersecurity-asset-inventory-guidance-owners-and-operators" title="Foundations for OT Cybersecurity: Asset Inventory Guidance for Owners and Operators"><strong>Foundations for OT Cybersecurity: Asset Inventory Guidance for Owners and Operators</strong></a> to help with reducing cybersecurity risk by identifying which assets within their environment should be secured and protected.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Ensure OT assets use robust authentication procedures.</strong>
<ul>
<li>Many devices lack robust authentication and authorization. Devices with weak authentication are vulnerable targets to threat actors using credential theft techniques.</li>
<li>Implement MFA where possible. Where MFA is not feasible, use strong, unique passwords. Apply password standards for operator-accessible services on underlying OT assets, as well as network devices protecting those services. This is especially important for services that require internet accessibility [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#ChangingDefaultPasswords3A" title="CPG 3.A">CPG 3.A</a>] [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#EstablishMinimumPasswordStrength3B" title="CPG 3.B">CPG 3.B</a>] [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#CreateUniqueCredentials3C" title="CPG 3.C">CPG 3.C</a>] [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#ImplementMultifactorAuthentication3F" title="CPG 3.F">CPG 3.F</a>].</li>
<li>Establish an allowlist that permits only authorized device IP addresses and/or media access control addresses. The allowlist can be refined to operator working hours to further obstruct malicious threat actor activity; organizations are encouraged to establish monitoring and alerting for access attempts not meeting these criteria [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#MonitorUnsuccessfulAutomatedLoginAttempts3E" title="CPG 3.E">CPG 3.E</a>].</li>
<li>Disable any unused authentication methods, logic, or features, such as default authentication keys and default passwords. Block all unused high ephemeral ports and monitor for attempted connections using standard protocols on non-standard ports [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#ProhibitConnectionofUnauthorizedDevices3R" title="CPG 3.R">CPG 3.R</a>].</li>
<li>Authenticate all access to field controllers before authorizing access to, or modification of, a device’s state, logic, program, or filesystems.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Enable control system security features </strong>that can separate and audit view and control functions. Limiting remotely accessible or default user accounts to “view-only” removes the potential for impact without exploiting a vulnerability [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#AdministratorsMaintainSeparateUserandPrivilegedAccounts3G" title="CPG 3.G">CPG 3.G</a>].</li>
<li><strong>Implement and practice business recovery/disaster recovery plans.</strong> Plans should also take into consideration redundancy, fail-safe mechanisms, islanding capabilities, backup restoration, and manual operation.
<ul>
<li>Include scenarios that necessitate switching to manual operations. Maintaining the capability of an organization to revert to manual controls to quickly restore operations is vital in the immediate aftermath of a cyber incident [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#IncidentPlanningandPreparedness6A" title="CPG 6.A">CPG 6.A</a>].</li>
<li>Create backups of the engineering logic, configurations, and firmware of HMIs to enable fast recovery. Organizations should routinely test backups and standby systems to ensure safe manual operations in the event of an incident [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#MaintainSystemBackupsRestorationAbility3O" title="CPG 3.O">CPG 3.O</a>].</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Collect and monitor the traffic of OT assets and networking devices.</strong> This includes unusual logins or unexpected protocols communicating over the internet, and functions of ICS management protocols that change an asset’s operating mode or modify programs.</li>
<li><strong>Review configurations for setpoint ranges or tag values </strong>to stay within safe ranges and establish alerting for deviations.</li>
<li><strong>Take a proactive approach in the procurement process</strong> by following the guidance outlined in the joint guide <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/secure-demand-priority-considerations-operational-technology-owners-and-operators-when-selecting" title="Secure by Demand: Priority Considerations for Operational Technology Owners and Operators when Selecting Digital Products">Secure by Demand: Priority Considerations for Operational Technology Owners and Operators when Selecting Digital Products</a>.</li>
</ul>
<h3>OT Device Manufacturers</h3>
<p>Although critical infrastructure organizations can take steps to mitigate risks, it is ultimately the responsibility of OT device manufacturers to build products that are secure by design. The authoring organizations urge device manufacturers to take ownership of the security outcomes of their customers in line with the joint guide <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/secure-by-design" title="Shifting the Balance of Cybersecurity Risk: Principles and Approaches for Secure by Design Software">Shifting the Balance of Cybersecurity Risk: Principles and Approaches for Secure by Design Software</a>.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Eliminate default credentials and require strong passwords.</strong> The use of default credentials is a top weakness threat actors exploit to gain access to systems.</li>
<li><strong>Mandate MFA for privileged users.</strong> Changes to engineering logic or configurations are safety-impacting events in critical infrastructure. MFA should be available for safety critical components at no additional cost.</li>
<li><strong>Practice secure by default principles. </strong>OT components were initially designed without public internet connectivity in mind. When internet connection becomes necessary, implementing additional security measures is essential to safeguard these systems. Manufacturers should recognize insecure states and promptly inform users so they can make informed risk decisions.
<ul>
<li><strong>Include logging at no additional charge.</strong> Change and access control logs allow operators to track safety-impacting events in their critical infrastructure. These logs should be available for no cost and use open standard logging formats.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Publish Software Bill of Materials (SBOMs).</strong> Vulnerabilities in underlying software libraries can affect a wide range of devices. Without an SBOM, it is nearly impossible for a critical infrastructure system owner to measure and mitigate the impact of a vulnerability on their existing systems. See CISA’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sbom" title="Software Bill of Materials">SBOM webpage</a> for more information.</li>
</ul>
<p>Additionally, see CISA’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/secure-design-alert-how-software-manufacturers-can-shield-web-management-interfaces-malicious-cyber" title="Secure by Design Alert">Secure by Design Alert</a> on how software manufacturers can shield web management interfaces from malicious cyber activity. By using secure by design tactics, software manufacturers can make their product lines secure “out of the box” without requiring customers to spend additional resources making configuration changes, purchasing tiered security software and logs, monitoring, and making routine updates.</p>
<p>For more information on secure by design, see CISA’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/securebydesign" title="Secure by Design">Secure by Design</a> webpage.</p>
<h2><strong>Validate Security Controls</strong></h2>
<p>In addition to applying mitigations, the authoring organizations recommend exercising, testing, and validating your organization’s security program against the threat behaviors mapped to the MITRE ATT&amp;CK Matrix for Enterprise framework in this advisory. The authoring organizations recommend testing your existing security controls inventory to assess how it performs against the ATT&amp;CK techniques described in this advisory.</p>
<p>To start:</p>
<ol>
<li>Select an ATT&amp;CK technique described in this advisory (see <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Table1" title="Table 1"><strong>Table 1</strong></a> to<strong> </strong><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Table10" title="Table 10"><strong>Table 10</strong></a>).</li>
<li>Align your security technologies against the technique.</li>
<li>Test your technologies against the technique.</li>
<li>Analyze your detection and prevention technologies’ performance.</li>
<li>Repeat the process for all security technologies to obtain a set of comprehensive performance data.</li>
<li>Tune your security program, including people, processes, and technologies, based on the data generated by this process.</li>
</ol>
<p>The authoring organizations recommend continually testing your security program, at scale, in a production environment to ensure optimal performance against the MITRE ATT&amp;CK techniques identified in this advisory.</p>
<h2><strong>Resources</strong></h2>
<p>Entities requiring additional support for implementing any of the mitigations in this advisory should contact their regional CISA Cybersecurity Advisor for assistance. Key resources organizations should reference include:</p>
<ul>
<li>CISA, EPA, NSA, FBI, ASD’s ACSC, Cyber Centre, BSI, NCSC-NL, and NCSC-NZ’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/foundations-ot-cybersecurity-asset-inventory-guidance-owners-and-operators" title="Foundations for OT Cybersecurity: Asset Inventory Guidance for Owners and Operators">Foundations for OT Cybersecurity: Asset Inventory Guidance for Owners and Operators</a> offers best practices to assist organizations in identifying and prioritizing which assets should be secured and protected.</li>
<li>CISA, FBI, NSA, EPA, DOE, USDA, FDA, MS-ISAC, Cyber Centre, and NCSC-UK’s guidance on <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/defending-ot-operations-against-ongoing-pro-russia-hacktivist-activity" title="Defending OT Operations Against Ongoing Pro-Russia Hacktivist Activity">Defending OT Operations Against Ongoing Pro-Russia Hacktivist Activity</a> that can help organizations protect OT systems from pro-Russia hacktivist activity.</li>
<li>NSA and CISA’s guidance on <a href="https://media.defense.gov/2022/Sep/22/2003083007/-1/-1/0/CSA_ICS_Know_the_Opponent_.PDF" target="_blank" title="Control System Defense: Know the Opponent" data-entity-type="external">Control System Defense: Know the Opponent</a> helps organizations defend OT and ICS assets against malicious cyber activity.</li>
<li>CISA and EPA’s resource page on <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/water" title="Water and Wastewater Cybersecurity">Water and Wastewater Cybersecurity</a> to help organizations reduce risks posed by malicious cyber actors targeting water and wastewater systems.
<ul>
<li>For additional guidance, see CISA, EPA, and FBI’s fact sheet on <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/top-cyber-actions-securing-water-systems" title="Top Cyber Actions for Securing Water Systems">Top Cyber Actions for Securing Water Systems</a>.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>The Food and Ag-ISAC’s best practices on <a href="https://www.idfa.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Food-and-Ag-ISAC-Cybersecurity-Guide-2023_IDFA.pdf" target="_blank" title="Food and Ag Cybersecurity: A Guide for Small &amp; Medium Enterprises" data-entity-type="external">Food and Ag Cybersecurity: A Guide for Small &amp; Medium Enterprises</a> provides recommendations to help mitigate against cyber threats.</li>
<li>DOE and National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners <a href="https://www.naruc.org/core-sectors/critical-infrastructure-and-cybersecurity/cybersecurity-for-utility-regulators/cybersecurity-baselines/" target="_blank" title="Cybersecurity Baselines for Electric Distribution Systems and Distributed Energy (DER)" data-entity-type="external">Cybersecurity Baselines for Electric Distribution Systems and Distributed Energy (DER)</a> webpage provides resources for state public utility commissions and utilities, as well as DER operators and aggregators to help mitigate cybersecurity risks.</li>
</ul>
<p>Additional resources that apply to this advisory include:</p>
<ul>
<li>EPA’s <a href="https://www.epa.gov/cyberwater/epa-cybersecurity-water-sector" target="_blank" title="Cybersecurity for the Water Sector" data-entity-type="external">Cybersecurity for the Water Sector</a> resource page provides organizations with guidance on implementing basic cyber hygiene practices.</li>
<li>CISA’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cross-sector-cybersecurity-performance-goals" title="Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals">Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals</a> enables critical infrastructure organizations to reduce the likelihood and impact of known risks and adversary techniques.</li>
<li>CISA’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/audiences/small-and-medium-businesses/secure-your-business/require-strong-passwords" title="Require Strong Passwords">Require Strong Passwords</a> webpage supports small and medium-sized businesses mitigating against malicious cyber activity that targets weak passwords.</li>
<li>CISA, NSA, FBI, EPA, TSA, and international partners’ guidance <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/secure-demand-priority-considerations-operational-technology-owners-and-operators-when-selecting" title="Secure by Demand: Priority Considerations for Operational Technology Owners and Operators when Selecting Digital Products">Secure by Demand: Priority Considerations for Operational Technology Owners and Operators when Selecting Digital Products</a>.</li>
<li>DOE’s guidance on <a href="https://www.energy.gov/ceser/cyber-informed-engineering" target="_blank" title="Cyber-Informed Engineering" data-entity-type="external">Cyber-Informed Engineering</a> recommends considering cyber-enabled risks during the conception, design, and development phases when manufacturing physical systems.</li>
<li>CISA’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cyber-hygiene-services" title="Cyber Hygiene Services">Cyber Hygiene Services</a> help enable critical infrastructure organizations to reduce their exposure to threats by taking a proactive approach to monitoring and mitigating attack vectors.</li>
<li>CISA, NSA, FBI, and international partners’ guidance on <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/secure-by-design" title="Shifting the Balance of Cybersecurity Risk: Principles and Approaches for Secure by Design Software">Shifting the Balance of Cybersecurity Risk: Principles and Approaches for Secure by Design Software</a> urges software manufacturers to provide customers with products that are safer and more secure.
<ul>
<li>See more information in these Secure by Design Alerts: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/secure-design-alert-how-manufacturers-can-protect-customers-eliminating-default-passwords" title="How Manufacturers Can Protect Customers by Eliminating Default Passwords">How Manufacturers Can Protect Customers by Eliminating Default Passwords</a> and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/secure-design-alert-how-software-manufacturers-can-shield-web-management-interfaces-malicious-cyber" title="How Software Manufacturers Can Shield Web Management Interfaces From Malicious Cyber Activity">How Software Manufacturers Can Shield Web Management Interfaces From Malicious Cyber Activity</a>.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h2><a class="ck-anchor"><strong>Contact Information</strong></a></h2>
<p><strong>U.S. organizations</strong> are encouraged to report suspicious or criminal activity related to information in this advisory to CISA, FBI, and/or NSA:</p>
<ul>
<li>Contact CISA via CISA’s 24/7 Operations Center at <a href="mailto:contact@cisa.dhs.gov" title="contact@cisa.dhs.gov">contact@cisa.dhs.gov</a> or 1-844-Say-CISA (1-844-729-2472) or your local <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices" target="_blank" title="FBI field office" data-entity-type="external">FBI field office</a>. When available, please include the following information regarding the incident: date, time, and location of the incident; type of activity; number of people affected; type of equipment used for the activity; the name of the submitting company or organization; and a designated point of contact.</li>
<li>For NSA cybersecurity guidance inquiries, contact <a href="mailto:CybersecurityReports@nsa.gov" target="_blank" title="CybersecurityReports@nsa.gov">CybersecurityReports@nsa.gov</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Australian organizations:</strong> Visit <a href="https://www.cyber.gov.au/" target="_blank" title="cyber.gov.au" data-entity-type="external">cyber.gov.au</a> or call 1300 292 371 (1300 CYBER 1) to report cybersecurity incidents and access alerts and advisories.</p>
<p><strong>Canadian organizations:</strong> Report incidents by emailing Cyber Centre at <a href="mailto:contact@cyber.gc.ca" target="_blank" title="contact@cyber.gc.ca">contact@cyber.gc.ca</a>.</p>
<p><strong>New Zealand organizations:</strong> Report cyber security incidents to <a href="mailto:incidents@ncsc.govt.nz" target="_blank" title="incidents@ncsc.govt.nz">incidents@ncsc.govt.nz</a> or call 04 498 7654.</p>
<p><strong>United Kingdom organizations:</strong> Report a significant cyber security incident: <a href="https://report.ncsc.gov.uk/" target="_blank" title="report.ncsc.gov.uk" data-entity-type="external">report.ncsc.gov.uk</a> (monitored 24 hours) or, for urgent assistance, call 03000 200 973.</p>
<h2><strong>Disclaimer</strong></h2>
<p>The information in this report is being provided “as is” for informational purposes only. The authoring organizations do not endorse any commercial entity, product, company, or service, including any entities, products, or services linked within this document. Any reference to specific commercial entities, products, processes, or services by service mark, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by FBI and co-sealers.</p>
<h2><strong>Acknowledgements</strong></h2>
<p>Schneider Electric, Nozomi Networks, Eversource Energy, Electricity Information Sharing and Analysis Center, Chevron, BP, and Dragos contributed to this advisory.</p>
<h2><strong>Version History</strong></h2>
<p><strong>December 09, 2025:</strong> Initial version.</p>
<h2><strong>Appendix A: Targeting Methodologies for Pro-Russia Hacktivist Groups</strong></h2>
<p>For further information on targeting methodologies for pro-Russia hacktivist groups, see:</p>
<ul>
<li>CISA’s alert <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/alerts/2025/05/06/unsophisticated-cyber-actors-targeting-operational-technology" title="Unsophisticated Cyber Threat Actor(s) Targeting Operational Technology">Unsophisticated Cyber Threat Actor(s) Targeting Operational Technology</a>;</li>
<li>The joint fact sheet <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/primary-mitigations-reduce-cyber-threats-operational-technology" title="Primary Mitigations to Reduce Cyber Threats to Operational Technology">Primary Mitigations to Reduce Cyber Threats to Operational Technology</a>; and</li>
<li>CISA’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/cyber-threats-and-advisories/advanced-persistent-threats/russia" title="Russia Cyber Threat">Russia Cyber Threat</a> webpage.</li>
</ul>
<h2><a class="ck-anchor"><strong>Appendix B: Additional Designators Used for Cited Groups</strong></a></h2>
<p>The cybersecurity industry and cyber actor groups often use various names to reference actor groups. While not exhaustive, the following are the most notable names used within the cybersecurity community to reference the groups in this advisory.</p>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> Cybersecurity organizations have different methods of tracking and attributing cyber actors, and this may not be a 1:1 correlation to the authoring organizations’ understanding for all activity related to these groupings.</p>
<ul>
<li>GRU military unit 74455
<ul>
<li>Sandworm Team</li>
<li>Voodoo Bear</li>
<li>Seashell Blizzard</li>
<li>APT44</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Cyber Army of Russia Reborn (CARR)
<ul>
<li>CyberArmy of Russia</li>
<li>Народная CyberАрмия (НКА)</li>
<li>People’s CyberArmy of Russia (PCA)</li>
<li>Russian CyberArmy Team (RCAT)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>NoName057(16)
<ul>
<li>NoName057(16) Spain</li>
<li>NoName057(16) Italy</li>
<li>NoName057(16) France</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Z-Pentest
<ul>
<li>Z-Pentest Beograd</li>
<li>Z-Pentest Alliance</li>
<li>Z-Alliance</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Iranian-Affiliated Cyber Actors Exploit Programmable Logic Controllers Across US Critical Infrastructure]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Advisory at a Glance



Title
Iranian-Affiliated Cyber Actors Exploit Programmable Logic Controllers Across US Critical Infrastructure


Original Publication
April 7, 2026


Last Update 
July 22, 2026


Executive Summary
The authoring agencies urgently warn U.S. organizations of ongoing Iranian-a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693379/sicherheitsluecken/iranian-affiliated-cyber-actors-exploit-programmable-logic-controllers-across-us-critical-infrastructure/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693379/sicherheitsluecken/iranian-affiliated-cyber-actors-exploit-programmable-logic-controllers-across-us-critical-infrastructure/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 09:12:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><strong>Advisory at a Glance</strong></h2>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Title</th>
<td>Iranian-Affiliated Cyber Actors Exploit Programmable Logic Controllers Across US Critical Infrastructure</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Original Publication</th>
<td><strong>April 7, 2026</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Last Update </th>
<td><strong>July 22, 2026</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Executive Summary</th>
<td>The authoring agencies urgently warn U.S. organizations of ongoing Iranian-affiliated cyber targeting of internet-connected operational technology (OT) devices, including programmable logic controllers (PLCs). These actions disrupted PLCs across several U.S. critical infrastructure sectors through malicious project file interactions and manipulation of data on human machine interface (HMI) and supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) displays, resulting in operational disruption and financial loss.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Last Update Description</th>
<td>This update adds new guidance on detecting malicious changes in reusable code modules exploited within Rockwell Automation PLC programs. It also expands scope to include observed targeting of Schneider Electric, Siemens, and potentially other branded/manufactured PLCs, emphasizing the importance of restricting direct internet access and providing best practices for secure deployment.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Affected Products</th>
<td>Potentially all internet exposed PLCs, including Rockwell Automation/Allen-Bradley, Schneider Electric, Siemens, and other branded/manufactured PLCs.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Key Actions</th>
<td>
<ul type="square">
<li>Install PLCs consistent with manufacturers' guidelines and security best practices.</li>
<li>Remove PLCs from direct internet exposure via secure gateway and firewall; work with IT/OT team members and/or integrators to perform this action.</li>
<li>Query available logs for the provided indicators of compromise (IOCs) and check available logs for suspicious traffic on the ports associated with OT devices, including <code>44818</code>, <code>2222</code>, <code>102</code>, and <code>502</code>, especially traffic originating from foreign hosting providers.</li>
<li>For Rockwell Automation devices, place the physical mode switch on the controller into run position. If you suspect your organization was targeted, including against other branded PLC devices, contact the authoring agencies and PLC manufacturer for guidance.</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Indicators of Compromise</th>
<td>
<p>For a downloadable copy of July 22, 2026<strong> </strong>IOCs, see:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-07/AA26-097A.stix_.xml">AA26-097A STIX XML</a> (July 2026) (29 KB)</li>
<li><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-07/AA26-097A.stix_.json">AA26-097A STIX JSON</a> (July 2026) (30 KB)</li>
</ul>
<p>For a downloadable copy of historical April 7, 2026 IOCs, see:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-04/AA26-097A.stix_.xml" title="AA26-097A STIX XML">AA26-097A STIX XML</a> (36 KB)</li>
<li><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-04/AA26-097A.stix_.json" title="AA26-097A STIX JSON">AA26-097A STIX JSON</a> (12 KB)<br> </li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Intended Audience</th>
<td>
<p><strong>Organizations:</strong> Critical Infrastructure</p>
<p><strong>Sectors: </strong><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/government-services-facilities-sector" title="Government Services and Facilities">Government Services and Facilities</a>, <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/water-and-wastewater-sector" title="Water and Wastewater Systems">Water and Wastewater Systems</a> (WWS), and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/energy-sector" title="Energy">Energy</a> </p>
<p><strong>Roles: </strong>Integrators, asset owners, <a href="https://niccs.cisa.gov/tools/nice-framework/work-role/defensive-cybersecurity" title="Defensive cybersecurity analysts">defensive cybersecurity analysts</a>, <a href="https://niccs.cisa.gov/tools/nice-framework/work-role/operational-technology-ot-cybersecurity-engineering" title="OT cybersecurity engineers">OT cybersecurity engineers</a>, <a href="https://niccs.cisa.gov/tools/nice-framework/work-role/cybersecurity-architecture" title="cybersecurity architects">cybersecurity architects</a>, <a href="https://niccs.cisa.gov/tools/nice-framework/work-role/secure-systems-development" title="secure systems developer">secure systems developer</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2><strong>Introduction</strong></h2>
<p><strong>Note:</strong><em> This advisory was originally published on April 7, 2026, to provide tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) and indicators of compromise (IOCs) related to ongoing cyber exploitation of internet-connected operational technology (OT) devices by</em> <em>Iranian-affiliated advanced persistent threat (APT) actors. The authoring agencies updated this advisory on July 22, 2026, to add new guidance on detecting malicious changes in reusable code modules leveraged within Rockwell Automation PLC programs. It also expands the manufacturer scope to include observed targeting of Schneider Electric, Siemens, and potentially other branded/manufactured PLCs, emphasizing the importance of restricting direct internet access and providing best practice resources for secure deployment.</em></p>
<p>The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), National Security Agency (NSA), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Department of Energy (DOE), United States Cyber Command – Cyber National Mission Force (CNMF), and Department of the Treasury (Treasury) (hereafter referred to as the “authoring agencies”) are urgently warning U.S. organizations of ongoing cyber exploitation of internet-connected OT devices—including PLCs manufactured by Rockwell Automation/Allen-Bradley, Schneider Electric, Siemens, and potentially other manufactured PLCs—across multiple U.S. critical infrastructure sectors. As a result of this activity, organizations from multiple U.S. critical infrastructure sectors experienced disruptions through malicious interactions with PLC project files<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Note1"><sup>1</sup></a> and the manipulation of data displayed on human machine interface (HMI) and supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) displays. In a few cases, this activity caused operational disruption and financial loss.</p>
<p>The authoring agencies assess a group of Iranian-affiliated APT actors is conducting this activity to cause disruptive effects within the United States. The group targeted devices spanning multiple U.S. critical infrastructure sectors, including <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/government-services-facilities-sector" title="Government Services and Facilities">Government Services and Facilities</a> (to include local municipalities), <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/water-and-wastewater-sector" title="Water and Wastewater Systems">Water and Wastewater Systems</a> (WWS), and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/energy-sector" title="Energy">Energy</a> Sectors. The authoring agencies previously reported on similar activity targeting PLCs by <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa23-335a" title="CyberAv3ngers">CyberAv3ngers</a> (aka Shahid Kaveh Group)—a cyber threat actor affiliated with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Cyber Electronic Command (CEC).</p>
<p>Due to the widespread use of these PLCs, and the potential for additional targeting of other branded OT devices across critical infrastructure, the authoring agencies recommend U.S. organizations urgently review the TTPs and IOCs in this advisory for indications of current or historical activity on their networks, and apply the recommendations listed in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Mitigations"><strong>Mitigations</strong></a> section of this advisory to reduce the risk of compromise.</p>
<p>If owners and operators discover an affected internet-accessible device in their environment, additional technical measures may be necessary to evaluate the risk of compromise. Please engage your cyber incident response plans and contact the authoring agencies and applicable vendors through existing support channels available to customers and integrators (see <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Contact"><strong>Contact Information</strong></a>) to receive support, mitigation, and investigation assistance.</p>
<p>For more information on Iranian malicious cyber activity, see CISA’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/cyber-threats-and-advisories/advanced-persistent-threats/iran" title="Iran Cyber Threat Overview and Advisories">Iran Threat Overview and Advisories</a> webpage and the FBI’s <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/counterintelligence/the-iran-threat" target="_blank" title="Iran Threat">Iran Threat</a> and Iran <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/cyber/cyber-threat-overview-iran" target="_blank" title="Iran Cyber Threat">Cyber Threat Overview</a> webpages.</p>
<p>Download the PDF version of this report:</p>





<div class="c-file">
    <div class="c-file__download">
    <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-07/aa26-097a-iranian-affiliated-cyber-actors-exploit-programmable-logic-controllers-across-us-critical-infrastructure_508c.pdf" class="c-file__link" target="_blank">Iranian-Affiliated Cyber Actors Exploit Programmable Logic Controllers Across US Critical Infrastructure</a>
    <span class="c-file__size">(PDF,       1.09 MB
  )</span>
  </div>
</div>
<p><em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026)</strong></em> For a downloadable copy of July 22, 2026<strong> </strong>IOCs, see:</p>
<ul type="square">
<li><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-07/AA26-097A.stix_.xml">AA26-097A STIX XML</a> (XML, 29 KB)</li>
<li><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-07/AA26-097A.stix_.json">AA26-097A STIX JSON</a> (JSON, 30 KB)</li>
</ul>
<p>For a downloadable copy of historical April 7, 2026 IOCs, see:</p>





<div class="c-file">
    <div class="c-file__download">
    <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-04/AA26-097A.stix_.xml" class="c-file__link" target="_blank">AA26-097A.stix_.xml</a>
    <span class="c-file__size">(XML,       35.97 KB
  )</span>
  </div>
</div>





<div class="c-file">
    <div class="c-file__download">
    <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-04/AA26-097A.stix_.json" class="c-file__link" target="_blank">AA26-097A.stix_.json</a>
    <span class="c-file__size">(JSON,       11.87 KB
  )</span>
  </div>
</div>
<h2><strong>Background Information</strong></h2>
<h3><strong>Similar Historical Activity Targeting Programmable Logic Controllers</strong></h3>
<p>During a similar campaign beginning in November 2023, the IRGC CEC-affiliated cyber threat actors known as "CyberAv3ngers” targeted U.S.-based PLCs and HMIs, causing disruptive effects. Private industry and open sources also refer to this group as Hydro Kitten, Storm-0784, APT Iran, Bauxite, Mr. Soul, Soldiers of Solomon, UNC5691, and the Shahid Kaveh Group. These attacks compromised at least 75 devices, targeting U.S.-based Unitronics PLC devices with an HMI used across multiple critical infrastructure sectors, including the WWS. APT actors developed and deployed custom ladder logic code to these devices, replacing the valid ladder logic with malicious code that continues to be observed to date.</p>
<p>For more information on this group’s activity, see the joint Cybersecurity Advisory <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa23-335a" title="IRGC-Affiliated Cyber Actors Exploit PLCs in Multiple Sectors, Including US Water and Wastewater Systems Facilities">IRGC-Affiliated Cyber Actors Exploit PLCs in Multiple Sectors, Including US Water and Wastewater Systems Facilities</a>.</p>
<h3><strong>Ongoing Threat Actor Activity Against U.S.-Based Programmable Logic Controllers</strong></h3>
<p>The FBI observed Iranian-affiliated APT actors targeting internet-exposed PLCs with the intent to cause disruptions—including maliciously interacting with project files, and manipulating data displayed on HMI and SCADA displays—to U.S. critical infrastructure organizations. Iranian-affiliated APT targeting campaigns against U.S. critical infrastructure have recently escalated, likely in response to hostilities between Iran, and the United States and Israel.</p>
<p><em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026) </strong></em>At one U.S. victim, the FBI observed the APT actors download a malicious project file to a targeted PLC using configuration software. Analysis indicated the project file retained ladder logic for downstream function but added logic that overrode specific instruction sets responsible for maintaining safe operating parameters in the victim’s environment.</p>
<p>Since at least March 2026, the authoring agencies identified (through engagements with victim organizations) an Iranian-affiliated APT group disrupted the function of PLCs. Organizations across several U.S. critical infrastructure sectors (including <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/government-services-facilities-sector" title="Government Services and Facilities">Government Services and Facilities</a>, <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/water-and-wastewater-sector" title="Water and Wastewater Systems">WWS</a>, and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/critical-infrastructure-security-and-resilience/critical-infrastructure-sectors/energy-sector" title="Energy">Energy</a> Sectors) deployed these PLCs within a wide variety of industrial automation processes. Some of the victims experienced operational disruption and financial loss.</p>
<h2><strong>Technical Details</strong></h2>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> This advisory uses the <a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/matrices/enterprise/" target="_blank" title="MITRE ATTACK Matrix for Enterprise">MITRE ATT&amp;CK<sup>®</sup> Matrix for Enterprise</a> framework, version 19. See the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#MITRE"><strong>MITRE ATT&amp;CK Tactics and Techniques</strong></a> section of this advisory for tables of the threat actors’ activity mapped to MITRE ATT&amp;CK tactics and techniques.</p>
<h3><strong>Initial Access</strong></h3>
<p><em><strong>(Updated, July 22, 2026)</strong></em> The authoring agencies observed Iranian-affiliated APT actors using several foreign-based IP addresses to access internet-facing PLCs manufactured by Rockwell Automation/Allen-Bradley, Schneider Electric, Siemens, and potentially other manufactured PLCs [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T0883/" target="_blank" title="T0883">T0883</a>]. The actors used leased, third-party hosted infrastructure and manufacturers’ PLC programming software to connect to misconfigured victim PLCs. Inbound malicious traffic has been observed targeting PLC devices on the following ports: <code>44818</code>, <code>2222</code>, <code>102</code>, and <code>502</code>, as well as targeting modems on port <code>22</code>. Targeted devices include:</p>
<ul type="square">
<li><strong>Rockwell Automation:</strong> CompactLogix and Micro850 PLCs</li>
<li><strong>Schneider Electric:</strong> BMX P34/Modicon M340 PLCs</li>
<li><strong>Siemens:</strong> S7-1200 series PLCs</li>
</ul>
<h3><strong>Command and Control</strong></h3>
<p><em><strong>(Updated, July 22, 2026)</strong></em> The targeting of ports [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T0885/" target="_blank" title="T0885">T0885</a>] associated with other OT vendors’ protocols suggests these actors are opportunistically targeting devices manufactured by companies other than Rockwell Automation/Allen-Bradley, including Schneider Electric and Siemens. In one reported instance, the actors utilized Dropbear Secure Shell (SSH) software on victim modems to enable them to gain remote access through port <code>22</code> [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1219/" target="_blank" title="T1219">T1219</a>].</p>
<h3><strong>Exfiltration</strong></h3>
<p><em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026) </strong></em>The authoring agencies observed Iranian-affiliated APT actors using configuration software—such as Rockwell Automation’s Studio 5000 Logix Designer, Schneider Electric’s EcoStruxure Control Expert, and Siemens’ Totally Integrated Automation (TIA) Portal—on leased, third-party hosted infrastructure to exfiltrate device project files from PLC devices to threat-actor-controlled infrastructure [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1041/" target="_blank" title="T1041">T1041</a>].</p>
<h3><strong>Impact</strong></h3>
<p><em><strong>(Updated, July 22, 2026)</strong></em> After the actors extracted device project files, the FBI and CISA identified the modification and deletion of project file logic, to include Add-On Instructions (AOIs) and data manipulation on HMI and SCADA displays [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1565/" target="_blank" title="T1565">T1565</a>]. Additionally, the changes disabled critical shutdown and alarm logic, allowing systems to enter unsafe conditions without notifying operators of the anomalies.</p>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> An AOI is analogous to a “Function Block” or “User Defined Function Block” used in other PLC vendor programs.</p>
<h2><strong>Indicators of Compromise</strong></h2>
<p>See <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Table1"><strong>Table 1</strong></a><strong> </strong>and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Table2"><strong>Table 2</strong></a> for recent IP addresses used by the Iranian-affiliated APT actors to communicate with PLCs manufactured by Rockwell Automation/Allen-Bradley, Schneider Electric, and Siemens in the United States.</p>
<p><strong>Disclaimer:</strong> The FBI observed the threat actors using the IP addresses listed below in the specified time frames. This data is being provided for customers to query against logs for indications of historical targeting by the Iranian-affiliated APT actors. The authoring agencies recommend organizations investigate or vet these IP addresses prior to taking action, such as blocking.</p>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><a class="ck-anchor"></a>Table 1. Indicators of Compromise <em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026)</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">Indicator</th>
<th role="columnheader">Beginning of Actor Association</th>
<th role="columnheader">End of Actor Association</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>185.82.73[.]175</td>
<td>September 2025</td>
<td>February 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>141.11.164[.]153</td>
<td>January 2026</td>
<td>June 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>175.110.121[.]42</td>
<td>February 2026</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>175.110.121[.]39</td>
<td>February 2026</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>175.110.121[.]41</td>
<td>February 2026</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>175.110.121[.]107</td>
<td>February 2026</td>
<td>February 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>192.142.54[.]79</td>
<td>May 2026</td>
<td>June 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>84.200.205[.]165</td>
<td>May 2026</td>
<td>June 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>185.225.17[.]225</td>
<td>June 2026</td>
<td>July 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>79.133.46[.]209</td>
<td>July 2026</td>
<td>July 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>88.80.150[.]199</td>
<td>July 2026</td>
<td>July 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>88.80.150[.]200</td>
<td>July 2026</td>
<td>July 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>88.80.150[.]202</td>
<td>July 2026</td>
<td>July 2026</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><a class="ck-anchor"></a>Table 2. Indicators of Compromise </caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">Indicator</th>
<th role="columnheader">Beginning of Actor Association</th>
<th role="columnheader">End of Actor Association</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>185.82.73[.]162</td>
<td>January 2025</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>185.82.73[.]164</td>
<td>January 2025</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>185.82.73[.]165</td>
<td>January 2025</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>185.82.73[.]167</td>
<td>January 2025</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>185.82.73[.]168</td>
<td>January 2025</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>185.82.73[.]170</td>
<td>January 2025</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>185.82.73[.]171</td>
<td>January 2025</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>135.136.1[.]133</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
<td>March 2026</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2><a class="ck-anchor"></a><a class="ck-anchor"><strong>MITRE ATT&amp;CK Tactics and Techniques</strong></a></h2>
<p>See <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Table3"><strong>Table 3</strong></a> to <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Table6"><strong>Table 6</strong></a><strong> </strong>for all referenced threat actor tactics and techniques in this advisory. The authoring agencies recommend organizations review historical TTPs for similar Iranian-affiliated cyber actor activity in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa23-335a" title="IRGC-Affiliated Cyber Actors Exploit PLCs in Multiple Sectors, Including US Water and Wastewater Systems Facilities">IRGC-Affiliated Cyber Actors Exploit PLCs in Multiple Sectors, Including US Water and Wastewater Systems Facilities</a>. For assistance with mapping malicious cyber activity to the MITRE ATT&amp;CK framework, see CISA and MITRE ATT&amp;CK’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/news/best-practices-mitre-attckr-mapping" title="Best Practices for MITRE ATT&amp;CK Mapping">Best Practices for MITRE ATT&amp;CK Mapping</a> and CISA’s <a href="https://github.com/cisagov/Decider/" title="Decider Tool">Decider Tool</a>.</p>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><a class="ck-anchor"></a>Table 3. Initial Access</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">Technique Title</th>
<th role="columnheader">ID</th>
<th role="columnheader">Use</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Internet Accessible Device</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T0883/" target="_blank" title="T0833">T0883</a></td>
<td>The actors accessed and interacted with publicly exposed, internet-accessible PLCs that lacked sufficient network and/or hardening security controls.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption>Table 4. Command and Control</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">Technique Title</th>
<th role="columnheader">ID</th>
<th role="columnheader">Use</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Commonly Used Port</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T0885/" target="_blank" title="T0885">T0885</a></td>
<td>The actors leveraged commonly used OT ports to communicate with PLCs.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Remote Access Tools </td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1219/" target="_blank" title="T1219">T1219</a></td>
<td>The actors deployed Dropbear SSH software on victim modems to enable them to gain remote access through port <code>22</code>.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption>Table 5. Exfiltration <em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026)</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">Technique Title</th>
<th role="columnheader">ID</th>
<th role="columnheader">Use</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Exfiltration Over C2 Channel</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1041/" target="_blank" title="T1041">T1041</a></td>
<td>The actors used remote, third-party hosted infrastructure as a C2 channel to transfer device project files out of victim environments.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><a class="ck-anchor"></a>Table 6. Impact</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">Technique Title</th>
<th role="columnheader">ID</th>
<th role="columnheader">Use</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Data Manipulation</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1565/" target="_blank" title="T1565">T1565</a></td>
<td>The actors maliciously interacted with project files, including modifying and deleting project file logic, and altered data displayed on HMI and SCADA displays.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2><a class="ck-anchor"><strong>Mitigations</strong></a></h2>
<p>The authoring agencies recommend organizations implement the mitigations below to improve your organization’s cybersecurity posture on the basis of the threat actors’ activity. These mitigations align with the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cpg" title="Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPGs)">Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPGs)</a> developed by CISA and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The CPGs provide a minimum set of practices and protections that CISA and NIST recommend all organizations implement. CISA and NIST based the CPGs on existing cybersecurity frameworks and guidance to protect against the most common and impactful threats and TTPs. Visit CISA’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cpg" title="CPGs webpage">CPGs webpage</a> for more information on the CPGs, including additional recommended baseline protections.</p>
<h3><strong>Network Defenders</strong></h3>
<p>The cyber threat actors accessed PLCs manufactured by Rockwell Automation/Allen-Bradley, Schneider Electric, Siemens, and potentially other branded/manufactured PLCs to cause disruptions to victim systems. To safeguard against this threat and threats to other types of PLCs, the authoring agencies urge organizations to consider the following mitigations.</p>
<p><em><strong>(Updated, July 22, 2026)</strong></em> In addition to contacting the authoring agencies, organizations and integrators operating PLCs from the manufacturers mentioned in this advisory should review the previously issued guidance to strengthen the security of their OT deployments:</p>
<ul type="square">
<li><strong>Rockwell Automation:</strong> Contact the Rockwell Automation Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) at <a href="mailto:PSIRT@rockwellautomation.com">PSIRT@rockwellautomation.com</a> for questions regarding this guidance, or to report cyber incidents related to Rockwell Automation products.<br>
<ul type="circle">
<li>Refer to Rockwell Automation Security Advisory <a href="https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/trust-center/security-advisories/advisory.SD1771.html" target="_blank" title="SD1771">SD1771</a> for recommended PLC hardening measures and configuration guidance.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Schneider Electric:</strong> Contact the Schneider Electric Corporate Product Cyber Emergency Response Team (CPCERT) at <a href="mailto:cpcert@se.com">cpcert@se.com</a> for questions regarding this guidance, or to report cyber incidents related to Schneider Electric products.<br>
<ul type="circle">
<li>Refer to Schneider Electric’s <a href="https://download.se.com/files?p_File_Name=Cybersecurity_Best+Practices_EN.pdf&amp;p_Doc_Ref=7EN52-0390&amp;p_enDocType=White+Paper" target="_blank" title="Recommended Cybersecurity Best Practices">Recommended Cybersecurity Best Practices</a> and <a href="https://download.se.com/files?p_Doc_Ref=EIO0000001999&amp;p_enDocType=User+guide&amp;p_File_Name=EIO0000001999-13_Modicon_Controller_Platform_Cybersecurity_Guide_EN.pdf" target="_blank" title="Cybersecurity User Guide for Modicon Controller Platform">Cybersecurity User Guide for Modicon Controller Platform</a> for guidance on securing and configuring PLCs.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Siemens:</strong> Contact Siemens ProductCERT at <a href="mailto:productcert@siemens.com">productcert@siemens.com</a> for questions regarding this guidance, or to report cyber incidents and vulnerabilities related to Siemens products.<br>
<ul type="circle">
<li>Refer to <a href="https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssb-104599.html" target="_blank" title="Siemens Security Bulletin 104599">Siemens Security Bulletin 104599</a> for a list of security measures to harden PLCs and in-depth configuration guides.</li>
<li>Siemens users should review the <a href="https://cert-portal.siemens.com/operational-guidelines-industrial-security.pdf" target="_blank" title="Cybersecurity for Industry Operational Guidelines">Cybersecurity for Industry Operational Guidelines</a> and implement defense-in-depth controls within their automation systems.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Immediate steps to prevent the attack:</strong></p>
<ul type="square">
<li><strong>Disconnect the PLC from the public-facing internet</strong> [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#SecureInternetFacingDevices3S" title="CPG 3.S">CPG 3.S</a>]. Follow the joint guidance <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/operational-technology/secure-connectivity" target="_blank" title="Secure Connectivity Principles for OT">Secure connectivity principles for OT</a> to safely allow remote access. Specifically, “remove inbound port exposure,” so the OT system is never directly exposed to the internet or external networks, and to ensure all access is mediated, monitored, and controlled. Do this through a secure gateway (jump host) that brokers the connection.<br>
<ul type="circle">
<li>Ensure cellular modems, used for remote field connectivity and access, are secured with strong authentication and updated.</li>
<li>Enable logs for connected modems and regularly review for suspicious activity to detect intrusions and improve incident response speed.</li>
<li><em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026) </strong></em>To mitigate unauthorized access to OT via cellular modems, organizations should consider implementing isolated architectures, such as private Access Point Name (APN), 5G Public Network Integrated Non-Public Network (PNI-NPN), cellular Software-Defined Wide Area Network (SD-WAN), Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), or a site-to-site virtual private network (VPN).</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026) </strong></em><strong>Strictly control network access to PLC devices.</strong><br>
<ul type="circle">
<li>Configure firewall rules or access control list (ACL) security features on PLCs or programmable controllers to allow only authorized communications between expected control system devices. Block access from unauthorized or threat actor-controlled IP addresses, such as those associated with hosting providers.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>For controllers with a physical mode switch, place the physical mode switch into run position to prevent remote modification. </strong>Devices should only be in the program or remote position when updating or downloading software online and immediately switched back to the run position when complete. (See Rockwell Automation’s<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Note2"><sup>2</sup></a><sup> </sup><a href="https://literature.rockwellautomation.com/idc/groups/literature/documents/rm/secure-rm001_-en-p.pdf" target="_blank" title="System Security Design Guidelines">System Security Design Guidelines</a> for manufacturer’s instructions.)<br>
<ul type="circle">
<li><em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026)</strong> </em>Prior to switching the device to run mode, review and validate project files, as changing modes will lock in the current project file downloaded to the device.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>For devices that allow software key switching, </strong>enable programming protection in PLC configuration software (S7 TIA Portal) to limit who can modify PLCs remotely. (See Siemens’ <a href="https://assets.new.siemens.com/siemens/assets/api/uuid:c9a2de6e-6bd0-4c32-bba0-f64cac44fcc9/industrial-security-operational-guidelines-en.pdf" target="_blank" title="Cybersecurity for Industry Operational Guidelines">Cybersecurity for Industry Operational Guidelines</a> for the manufacturer’s instructions.)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Follow-up steps to strengthen security posture:</strong></p>
<ul type="square">
<li><em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026)</strong> </em><strong>Review project files running on PLCs for unauthorized changes.</strong> Use vendor-provided integrity checking tools and visually compare the running program to known good logic. Ensure reusable logic and input/output configurations are valid. For Rockwell Automation PLCs listed in the <a href="https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/trust-center/security-advisories/advisory.SD1771.html" target="_blank" title="Customer Guidance to Disconnect Devices from the Internet">Customer Guidance to Disconnect Devices from the Internet</a>, check the AOIs for any anomalous modifications.<br>
<ul type="circle">
<li>If restoring from backups, verify the backup does not contain malicious logic before deployment.</li>
<li>Review logs and configurations on all connected devices, including modems, HMIs, and workstations, to assess potential lateral movement by threat actors. If it appears the actors connected to additional devices, reimage these devices to remove any potential malicious changes or access tools.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026)</strong> </em><strong>Ensure device passwords are changed from their default </strong>and are configured to use complex, unique combinations of letters, numbers, and symbols that are not easily guessable. Implementing robust password practices remains a critical security measure that can help prevent unauthorized access and strengthen the overall security posture of OT devices.</li>
<li><em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026)</strong> </em><strong>Take defensive measures to minimize the risk of exploitation. </strong>Conduct comprehensive impact analysis and risk assessments prior to deploying defensive measures.</li>
<li><strong>Create and test strong backups of the logic and configurations of PLCs</strong>. Store backup files offline and secure the physical removal media to enable fast recovery.</li>
<li><strong>Implement multifactor authentication</strong> <strong>(MFA)</strong> [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#ImplementMultifactorAuthentication3F" title="CPG 3.F">CPG 3.F</a>] for access to the OT network from an external network.</li>
<li>If remote access is required, <strong>implement a network proxy, gateway, firewall, and/or VPN in front of the PLC to control network access</strong>.<br>
<ul type="circle">
<li>A VPN or gateway device can enable MFA for remote access even if the PLC does not support MFA. Implement security rules on these higher-level network security mechanisms to prevent the type of repeated and sustained login attempts seen during a brute force attack. When possible, implement a device control list for workstations sending messages or connecting to OT components.</li>
<li>Use the device control list to monitor for logon activity for unexpected or unusual access to devices from the internet.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Keep PLC devices updated with the latest software patches issued by the manufacturer.</strong> Use established downtime windows to install patches. <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog" title="Known Exploited Vulnerabilities">Known Exploited Vulnerabilities</a> may need to be prioritized outside a downtime window.</li>
<li><strong>Configure external and internal firewalls to block traffic using common ports </strong>associated with network protocols that are unnecessary for the particular network segment.</li>
<li><strong>Disable any unused authentication methods, logic, or features, </strong>such as default authentication keys and passwords, as well as unused or needed services such as Teletype Network (Telnet), File Transfer Protocol (FTP), Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), Virtual Network Computing (VNC), and web services.</li>
<li><strong>Monitor asset management systems for device configuration changes</strong>, which can be used to understand expected parameter settings.</li>
<li><strong>Monitor the content of network traffic</strong> for the following:<br>
<ul type="circle">
<li>Unusual logins to internet-connected devices or unexpected protocols to/from the internet. </li>
<li>Functions of industrial control systems management protocols that change an asset’s operating mode or modify programs.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><em><strong>(New, July 22, 2026)</strong> </em><strong>Ensure service providers are informed of active threats targeting internet-connected PLC devices. </strong>Owners and operators should communicate directly with service providers to address risks, especially when remote monitoring or maintenance is involved. Some service providers may rely on internet connectivity essential to monitor and maintain OT/ICS operations but may not be fully aware of active threats.</li>
</ul>
<p>In addition, the authoring agencies recommend network defenders apply the following mitigations to limit potential adversarial use of common system and network discovery techniques, as well as reduce the impact and risk of compromise by cyber threat actors:</p>
<ul type="square">
<li><strong>Reduce risk exposure</strong>. CISA offers a range of services at no cost, including scanning and testing, to help organizations reduce exposure to threats via mitigating attack vectors. CISA’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cyber-hygiene-services" title="Cyber Hygiene Services">Cyber Hygiene Services</a> can help provide additional review of organizations’ internet-accessible assets. </li>
</ul>
<h3><strong>Device Manufacturers</strong></h3>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> The following guidance is general in nature and not specific to any OT vendor. Some of the features, settings, and practices may already be offered by certain vendors. The inclusion of this guidance should not be interpreted as an assertion that vendors referenced do not offer such security features. Also, this advisory is not highlighting a new vulnerability in the identified products, but instead discusses opportunistic targeting. Device manufacturers can make opportunistic attacks more difficult at scale by encouraging more secure behavior by default and in operations, as discussed below. </p>
<p>Although critical infrastructure organizations using PLC devices can take steps to mitigate the risks, it is ultimately the responsibility of the device manufacturer to build products secured by design and default. The authoring agencies urge device manufacturers to take ownership of their customers’ security outcomes by following the principles in the joint guide <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/secure-demand-priority-considerations-operational-technology-owners-and-operators-when-selecting" title="Secure by Demand: Priority Considerations for Operational Technology Owners and Operators when Selecting Digital Products">Secure by Demand: Priority Considerations for OT Owners and Operators when Selecting Digital Products</a>, primarily:</p>
<ul>
<li>Change the manufacturers’ default settings to prevent exposing administrative interfaces to the internet.</li>
<li>Do not charge additional fees for basic security features needed to operate the product securely.</li>
<li>Support MFA, including via phishing-resistant methods.</li>
</ul>
<p>By using secure by design tactics, software manufacturers can make product lines secure “out of the box” without requiring customers to spend additional resources making configuration changes, purchasing tiered security software and logs, monitoring, and making routine updates.</p>
<p>For more information on common misconfigurations and guidance on reducing their prevalence, see joint advisory <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa23-278a" title="NSA and CISA Red and Blue Teams Share Top Ten Cybersecurity Misconfigurations">NSA and CISA Red and Blue Teams Share Top Ten Cybersecurity Misconfigurations</a>. For more information on secure by design, see CISA’s <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/securebydesign" title="Secure by Design">Secure by Design</a> webpage and joint guide.</p>
<h2><strong>Validate Security Controls</strong></h2>
<p>In addition to applying mitigations, the authoring agencies recommend exercising, testing, and validating your organization's security program against the threat behaviors mapped to the MITRE ATT&amp;CK for Enterprise framework in this advisory. The authoring agencies recommend testing your existing security controls inventory to assess how they perform against the ATT&amp;CK techniques described in this advisory.</p>
<p>To get started:</p>
<ol>
<li>Select an ATT&amp;CK technique described in this advisory (see<strong> </strong><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Table3"><strong>Table 3</strong></a> to <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Table6"><strong>Table 6</strong></a>).</li>
<li>Align your security technologies against the technique.</li>
<li>Test your technologies against the technique.</li>
<li>Analyze your detection and prevention technologies’ performance.</li>
<li>Repeat the process for all security technologies to obtain a set of comprehensive performance data.</li>
<li>Tune your security program, including people, processes, and technologies, based on the data generated by this process.</li>
</ol>
<p>The authoring agencies recommend continually testing your security program, at scale, in a production environment to ensure optimal performance against the ATT&amp;CK techniques identified in this advisory.</p>
<h2><strong>Resources</strong></h2>
<ul type="square">
<li>Authoring Agencies: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa23-335a" title="IRGC-Affiliated Cyber Actors Exploit PLCs in Multiple Sectors, Including US Water and Wastewater Systems Facilities">IRGC-Affiliated Cyber Actors Exploit PLCs in Multiple Sectors, Including US Water and Wastewater Systems Facilities</a></li>
<li>CISA: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/bulletproof-defense-mitigating-risks-bulletproof-hosting-providers" title="Bulletproof Defense: Mitigating Risks From Bulletproof Hosting Providers">Bulletproof Defense: Mitigating Risks From Bulletproof Hosting Providers</a></li>
<li>EPA: <a href="https://www.epa.gov/cyberwater/epa-cybersecurity-water-sector" target="_blank" title="Cybersecurity for the Water Sector">Cybersecurity for the Water Sector</a></li>
<li>CISA: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/water" title="Water and Wastewater Cybersecurity">Water and Wastewater Cybersecurity</a></li>
<li>CISA: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/alerts/2023/11/28/exploitation-unitronics-plcs-used-water-and-wastewater-systems" title="Exploitation of Unitronics PLCs used in Water and Wastewater Systems">Exploitation of Unitronics PLCs used in Water and Wastewater Systems</a></li>
<li>CISA: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/cyber-threats-and-advisories/advanced-persistent-threats/iran" title="Iran Cyber Threat Overview and Advisories">Iran Threat Overview and Advisories</a></li>
<li>FBI: <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/counterintelligence/the-iran-threat" target="_blank" title="The Iran Threat">The Iran Threat</a> and <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/cyber/cyber-threat-overview-iran" target="_blank" title="Cyber Threat Overview: Iran">Cyber Threat Overview: Iran</a></li>
<li>CISA, MITRE: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/news/best-practices-mitre-attckr-mapping" title="Best Practices for MITRE ATT&amp;CK Mapping">Best Practices for MITRE ATT&amp;CK Mapping</a></li>
<li>CISA: <a href="https://github.com/cisagov/Decider/" title="Decider Tool">Decider Tool</a></li>
<li>CISA: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0" title="Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals 2.0">Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals 2.0</a></li>
<li>CISA: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/cyber-threats-and-advisories/cyber-hygiene-services" title="No-Cost Cybersecurity Services and Tools">No-Cost Cybersecurity Services and Tools</a></li>
<li>CISA: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/secure-demand-priority-considerations-operational-technology-owners-and-operators-when-selecting" title="Secure by Demand: Priority Considerations for Operational Technology Owners and Operators when Selecting Digital Products">Secure by Demand: Priority Considerations for OT Owners and Operators when Selecting Digital Products</a></li>
<li>NSA, CISA: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa23-278a" title="NSA and CISA Red and Blue Teams Share Top Ten Cybersecurity Misconfigurations">NSA and CISA Red and Blue Teams Share Top Ten Cybersecurity Misconfigurations</a></li>
<li>CISA: <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/securebydesign" title="Secure by Design">Secure by Design</a></li>
<li>FBI, CISA: <a href="https://www.ic3.gov/CSA/2025/250506.pdf" target="_blank" title="Primary Mitigations to Reduce Cyber Threats to Operational Technology">Primary Mitigations to Reduce Cyber Threats to Operational Technology</a></li>
<li>United Kingdom National Cyber Security Centre: <a href="https://www.ic3.gov/CSA/2026/260114.pdf" target="_blank" title="Secure Connectivity Principles for Operational Technology (OT)">Secure connectivity principles for operational technology</a></li>
</ul>
<h2><a class="ck-anchor"><strong>Contact Information</strong></a></h2>
<p>U.S. organizations are encouraged to report suspicious or criminal activity related to information in this advisory to CISA, the FBI, and/or NSA:</p>
<ul type="square">
<li>Contact CISA via CISA’s 24/7 Operations Center at <a href="mailto:contact@cisa.dhs.gov">contact@cisa.dhs.gov</a> or 1-844-Say-CISA (1-844-729-2472). File a claim with FBI’s <a href="https://ic3.gov/" target="_blank" title="Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3)">Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3)</a> or contact your local <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices" target="_blank" title="FBI field office">FBI field office</a>. When available, please include the following information regarding the incident: 
<ul>
<li>Date, time, and location of the incident;</li>
<li>Type of activity;</li>
<li>Number of people affected;</li>
<li>Type of equipment used for the activity; and</li>
<li>Name of the submitting company or organization, and a designated point of contact.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>For NSA cybersecurity guidance inquiries, contact <a href="mailto:CybersecurityReports@nsa.gov" title="CybersecurityReports@nsa.gov">CybersecurityReports@nsa.gov</a>.</li>
<li>Entities required to report incidents to DOE should follow established reporting requirements, as appropriate. For other energy sector inquiries, contact <a href="mailto:EnergySRMA@hq.doe.gov" title="EnergySRMA@hq.doe.gov">EnergySRMA@hq.doe.gov</a>.</li>
<li>Contact the Rockwell Automation PSIRT for questions regarding their guidance or for reporting cyber incidents related to Rockwell Automation products at <a href="mailto:PSIRT@rockwellautomation.com" title="PSIRT@rockwellautomation.com">PSIRT@rockwellautomation.com</a>.</li>
<li>Contact the Schneider Electric CPCERT at <a href="mailto:cpcert@se.com">cpcert@se.com</a> for questions regarding this guidance, or to report cyber incidents related to Schneider Electric products.</li>
<li>Contact Siemens ProductCERT for up-to-date information about the security of Siemens products or to report cybersecurity vulnerabilities at <a href="mailto:productcert@siemens.com">productcert@siemens.com</a>. For support with increasing the security of installed Siemens PLCs, contact Siemens Industrial Cybersecurity Services at <a href="mailto:services.automation@siemens.com">services.automation@siemens.com</a>. See <a href="https://www.siemens.com/en-us/content/cert-services/" target="_blank" title="Siemens ProductCERT and Siemens CERT">Siemens ProductCERT and Siemens CERT</a> for more information.</li>
</ul>
<h2><strong>Disclaimer</strong></h2>
<p>The information in this report is being provided “as is” for informational purposes only. CISA and the authoring agencies do not endorse any commercial entity, product, company, or service, including any entities, products, or services linked within this document. Any reference to specific commercial entities, products, processes, or services by service mark, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by CISA and the authoring agencies.</p>
<h2><strong>Version History</strong></h2>
<p><strong>April 7, 2026</strong>: Initial version.</p>
<p><strong>July 22, 2026</strong>: Update includes new guidance on detecting malicious activity, expanded scope of observed targeting, and best practices for secure PLCs deployment.</p>
<h2><strong>Notes</strong></h2>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup>1</sup>Project file refers to the software file that contains ladder logic and configuration settings. On Rockwell Automation devices, it is referred to as an .ACD file.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup>2 </sup>See <a href="https://literature.rockwellautomation.com/idc/groups/literature/documents/um/1769-um021_-en-p.pdf" target="_blank" title="CompactLogix 5370 Controllers">CompactLogix 5370 Controllers</a> (Chapter 5: “Select the Operating Mode of the Controller”) for more information on functions available for the switch.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Defending Against China-Nexus Covert Networks of Compromised Devices]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Defending against china-nexus covert networks of compromised devices
executive summary
Defending against China-nexus covert networks of compromised devices 
Explaining the widespread shift in tactics, techniques and procedures (TTPs) towards networks of compromised infrastructure, and how to defe...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693378/sicherheitsluecken/defending-against-china-nexus-covert-networks-of-compromised-devices/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693378/sicherheitsluecken/defending-against-china-nexus-covert-networks-of-compromised-devices/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 09:10:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="SCXW131754345 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW131754345 BCX8">
<h2><a class="c-button c-button--on-dark" href="https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/news/defending-against-china-nexus-covert-networks-of-compromised-devices__;!!BClRuOV5cvtbuNI!Cvg8stIR3jHWVZgHhCVvEwbwDXxXIRSprOQ9JtY2YKwxUIGVovuDAu7QrFsfw3sfAVd8-gxEMIpgldwlY-jTD7G0%24">Defending against china-nexus covert networks of compromised devices</a></h2>
<h2><a class="c-button c-button--on-dark" href="https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/news/executive-summary-defending-against-china-nexus-covert-networks-of-compromised-devices__;!!BClRuOV5cvtbuNI!Cvg8stIR3jHWVZgHhCVvEwbwDXxXIRSprOQ9JtY2YKwxUIGVovuDAu7QrFsfw3sfAVd8-gxEMIpgldwlYzP90Ign%24">executive summary</a></h2>
<h2><strong>Defending against China-nexus covert networks of compromised devices </strong></h2>
<p>Explaining the widespread shift in tactics, techniques and procedures (TTPs) towards networks of compromised infrastructure, and how to defend against it </p>
<h3><strong>Summary</strong></h3>
<p>With support from the UK <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/information/cyber-league" target="_blank"><u>Cyber League</u></a>, this advisory has been jointly released by the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-UK) and international partners: </p>
<ul>
<li>Australian Signals Directorate’s (ASD’s) Australian Cyber Security Centre (ACSC)</li>
<li>Communications Security Establishment Canada’s (CSE’s) Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (Cyber Centre)</li>
<li>Germany Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution -   Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV)</li>
<li>Germany Federal Intelligence Service – Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND)</li>
<li>Germany Federal Office for Information Security - Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI)</li>
<li>Japan National Cybersecurity Office (NCO) - 国家サイバー統括室</li>
<li>Netherlands General Intelligence and Security Service - Algemene Inlichtingen- en Veiligheidsdienst (AIVD)</li>
<li>Netherlands Defence Intelligence and Security Service - Militaire Inlichtingen- en Veiligheidsdienst (MIVD)</li>
<li>New Zealand National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-NZ)</li>
<li>Spain National Cryptologic Centre – Centro Criptológico Nacional (CCN)</li>
<li>Sweden National Cyber Security Centre - Nationellt cybersäkerhetscenter (NCSC-SE)</li>
<li>United States Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)</li>
<li>United States Department of Defense Cyber Crime Center (DC3)</li>
<li>United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)</li>
<li>United States National Security Agency (NSA) </li>
</ul>
<p>Its purpose is to provide network defenders with the tools needed to defend against China-nexus cyber actors and their tactic of using large scale networks of compromised devices (covert networks) to route their cyber activity. </p>
<h3><strong>Introduction  </strong></h3>
<p>Over the past few years there has been a major shift in the tactics, techniques and procedures (TTPs) used by China-nexus cyber actors, moving away from the use of individually procured infrastructure, and towards the use of externally provisioned, large-scale networks of compromised devices. </p>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW149482171 BCX8">
<p>The NCSC believes that the majority of China-nexus threat actors are using these networks (hereafter “covert networks”), that multiple covert networks have been created and are being constantly updated, and that a single covert network could be being used by multiple actors. These networks are mainly made up of compromised Small Office Home Office (SOHO) routers, as well as Internet of Things (IoT) and smart devices. </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW149482171 BCX8">
<p>Anyone who is a target of China-nexus cyber actors may be impacted by the use of covert networks. They have been <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/news/ncsc-and-partners-issue-warning-about-state-sponsored-cyber-attackers-hiding-on-critical-infrastructure-networks" target="_blank"><u>used by Chinese state-sponsored actors Volt Typhoon</u></a> to pre-position offensive cyber capabilities on critical national infrastructure. The group <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/news/ncsc-and-partners-issue-advice-to-counter-china-linked-campaign-targeting-thousands-of-devices" target="_blank"><u>Flax Typhoon used a different covert network</u></a> of compromised infrastructure to conduct cyber espionage. </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW149482171 BCX8">
<p>The use of covert networks of compromised devices - also known as botnets - to facilitate malicious cyber activity is not new, but China-nexus cyber actors are now using them strategically, and at scale.  </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW149482171 BCX8">
<p>This advisory describes the typical makeup of a covert network and what they are being used for. It also includes protective advice for organizations being targeted by cyber activity using a covert network as an access vector.</p>
<h3><strong>Covert Networks </strong></h3>
<p>Covert networks are used to connect across the internet in a low-cost, low-risk, deniable way, disguising the origin and attribution of malicious activity. Actors have been observed using them for each phase of their Cyber Kill Chains, from performing scans as part of reconnaissance, to the delivery of malware, communicating with said malware, and exfiltrating stolen data from a victim. They can also be used for general deniable internet browsing, allowing threat actors to research exploitation techniques, new TTPs, and their victims without attribution. Some covert networks are also used by legitimate customers to browse the internet, making it challenging to attribute malicious activity. </p>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW53561783 BCX8">
<p>There is evidence that covert networks used by China-nexus actors are created and maintained by Chinese information security companies. A network known to network defenders as Raptor Train, which in 2024 infected more than 200,000 devices worldwide, was controlled and managed by the Chinese company, Integrity Technology Group. This company was also <a href="https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/court-authorized-operation-disrupts-worldwide-botnet-used-peoples-republic-china-state" target="_blank"><u>assessed by the FBI</u></a> to be responsible for the computer intrusion activities attributed to China-based hackers known as Flax Typhoon. </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW53561783 BCX8">
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Botnet operations represent a significant threat to the UK by exploiting vulnerabilities in everyday internet-connected devices with the potential to carry out large-scale cyber attacks – NCSC Director of Operations, Paul Chichester </strong></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW53561783 BCX8">
<p>Covert networks mostly consist of compromised SOHO routers, but they also pull in any vulnerable device they can exploit at scale. Raptor Train was made up of thousands of SOHO routers and IoT devices, such as web cameras and video recorders, as well as firewalls and Network Attached Storage (NAS) devices. The KV Botnet used by Volt Typhoon <a href="https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/us-government-disrupts-botnet-peoples-republic-china-used-conceal-hacking-critical" target="_blank"><u>was mainly made up of vulnerable Cisco and NetGear routers</u></a>. The edge devices were vulnerable because they were “end of life” – out of date and no longer receiving updates or security patches by their manufacturers. </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW53561783 BCX8">
<p>The cyber security industry has been aware of examples of these networks for some time and has publicly reported on the widespread scale of the threat and its implications. Mandiant Intelligence produced a <a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/china-nexus-espionage-orb-networks" target="_blank"><u>public blog in May 2024</u></a> talking about covert networks in which they highlighted a key issue for defenders – indicator of compromise (IOC) Extinction. If a particular threat group could now come from one of many covert networks, each with potentially hundreds of thousands of endpoints, and each used by multiple threat actors, old network defense paradigms of static malicious IP block lists will be less effective. This is compounded by the dynamic nature of these networks where new nodes will be added as old devices are patched or removed from use. </p>
<h3><strong>Typical Network Topology</strong></h3>
<p>The number of covert networks used by China-nexus cyber actors is large, with new networks regularly developed and deployed. The existing covert networks change too, either because of defensive or legal action, or simply as a result of software updates and new exploits being used to target different technologies for incorporation into the network. </p>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW21942648 BCX8">
<p>Because of this, a description of all known covert networks in detail, including how they are constructed and how they communicate, would immediately be out of date – and for most network defenders would not be practically useful. </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW21942648 BCX8">
<p>However, most covert networks of compromised devices use the same basic set up. Understanding this generalized structure can aid researchers and defenders by helping them to understand which part of a network they may have found, and how to defend against it. </p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-04/A%20diagram%20illustrating%20the%20basic%20setup%20of%20a%20covert%20network..png?itok=3Bfm4nKj" width="1024" height="877" alt="A diagram illustrating the basic setup of a covert network.">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption">A diagram illustrating the basic setup of a covert network.</figcaption>
  </figure>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW75515976 BCX8">
<p>The diagram above illustrates the basic setup of a covert network, where typically an actor will connect to the network via an on-ramp or entry node. Their traffic will be forwarded through multiple compromised devices, used as traversal nodes, before exiting the network from an exit node, usually in the same geographic region as the target. </p>
<h3><strong>Protective Advice </strong></h3>
<p>Defending from attackers using covert networks is not straightforward, and defensive tactics will be different based on the levels of resource and the nature of the target organization. General advice for good cyber security practice should be followed, and some key messages can be found in the appendix of this advisory.  </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW75515976 BCX8">
<p>The following advice is specifically tailored to steps which can be taken to combat the risk of attacks coming from large, dynamic networks of compromised devices. </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW75515976 BCX8">
<p>Further guidance for all organizations facing cyber security threats is available on the NCSC website. </p>
<p><em>This guidance should be considered alongside all applicable laws and regulations of the UK and co-sealing countries relating to the security of networks and data. It will be each organization’s responsibility to ensure compliance with any such laws and regulations. Organizations should note that following the recommended actions set out below will not remove all risks.</em></p>
<h4><strong>All organizations</strong></h4>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW75515976 BCX8">
<p>The NCSC recommends the following steps for all affected organizations to either take themselves, or ask their managed service and/or security providers to investigate for them: </p>
<ul>
<li>Map and understand network edge devices, developing a clear understanding of organizational assets and what should be connecting to them.</li>
<li>Baseline normal connections, especially to corporate virtual private networks (VPNs) or other similar services.
<ul>
<li>Would you expect connections from consumer broadband ranges?</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Leverage available dynamic threat feeds which include covert network infrastructure.</li>
<li>Implement multifactor authentication for remote connections.</li>
</ul>
<p>Smaller organizations should consider creating and actioning a <a href="https://cybertoolkit.service.ncsc.gov.uk/" target="_blank"><u>free NCSC Cyber Action Toolkit</u></a>. </p>
<h4><strong>Larger or more at-risk organizations</strong></h4>
<div class="SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Some more comprehensive measures may be appropriate if the risk to an organization is high enough, to be conducted either in-house or through a security provider:  </p>
<ul>
<li>Apply IP address allow lists rather than deny lists for connections to corporate VPNs for remote workers.</li>
<li>Use geographic allow lists or profile incoming connections based on operating system, time zones, and/or organization specific system configuration settings.</li>
<li>Implement zero trust policies for connections.</li>
<li>Enforce machine certificates for Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) connections.</li>
<li>Reduce the internet-facing presence of the IT estate.</li>
<li>Investigate machine learning techniques to profile normal network edge activity to detect and block anomalies. </li>
</ul>
<p><a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/cyberessentials/overview" target="_blank"><u>The NCSC's Cyber Essentials</u></a> can help protect organizations of all sizes. </p>
<h4><strong>Largest or most at-risk organizations</strong> </h4>
<p>If Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) tracking is part of an organization’s in-house capability, or if it is part of the service provided by a security vendor, consider tracking China-nexus covert networks as APTs in their own right.</p>
<ul>
<li>Active hunting – look for connections from IP addresses likely to be part of a covert network of compromised devices, for instance those hosting SOHO routers or IoT devices.</li>
<li>Track and map covert networks reported by industry or government by looking at banners and certificates.</li>
<li>Use threat reporting and threat feeds to create and implement dynamic blocklists and create alert rules to detect incoming threats.</li>
<li>Consider using NetFlow feeds to look upstream and map covert networks to find new nodes. </li>
</ul>
<p>The <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/cyber-assessment-framework" target="_blank"><u>NCSC Cyber Assessment Framework</u></a> provides guidance for organizations under the highest levels of threat, including those operating essential services, in sectors such as energy, healthcare, transport, digital infrastructure and government.  </p>
<h3><strong>MITRE ATT&amp;CK® </strong></h3>
<p>This advisory has been compiled with respect to the MITRE ATT&amp;CK® framework, a globally accessible knowledge base of adversary tactics and techniques based on real-world observations. </p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-justify"><strong>Tactic </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-justify"><strong>ID </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-justify"><strong>Technique </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-justify"><strong>Procedure </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><strong>Resource Development </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1584/005/" target="_blank"><u>T1584.005</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Compromise Infrastructure: Botnet </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Botnets are used as core components of covert networks </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><strong>Resource Development </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1584/008/" target="_blank"><u>T1584.008</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Compromise Infrastructure: Network Devices </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Devices are compromised and added to botnets </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><strong>Resource Development </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1583/003/" target="_blank"><u>T1583.003</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Acquire Infrastructure: Virtual Private Server </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Virtual private servers (VPS) are used in covert networks, typically as on-ramps </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><strong>Command and Control </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v18/techniques/T1090/003/" target="_blank"><u>T1090.003</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Proxy: Multi-hop Proxy </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Used by China-nexus cyber actors to route traffic </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<h3> <strong>Appendix: Cyber Security Best Practices </strong></h3>
<p>In addition to the protective advice outlined in this advisory, a number of cyber security best practices will also be useful in defending against the activity described in this advisory. </p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Protect your devices and networks by keeping them up to date</strong>: use the latest supported versions, apply security updates promptly, use antivirus and scan regularly to guard against known malware threats. See NCSC Guidance: <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/device-security-guidance/policies-and-settings/antivirus-and-other-security-software" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/device-security-guidance/policies-and-settings/antivirus-and-other-security-software</u></a></li>
<li><strong>Prevent and detect lateral movement in your organization’s networks</strong>. See NCSC Guidance: <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/preventing-lateral-movement" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/preventing-lateral-movement</u></a></li>
<li><strong>Implement architectural controls for network segregation</strong>. See NCSC Guidance: <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/10-steps-network-security" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/10-steps-network-security</u></a></li>
<li><strong>Set up a security monitoring</strong> <strong>capability</strong> so you are collecting the data that will be needed to analyze network intrusions. See NCSC Guidance: <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/introduction-logging-security-purposes" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/introduction-logging-security-purposes</u></a> and <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/information/logging-made-easy" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/information/logging-made-easy</u></a></li>
<li><strong>Use modern systems and software.</strong> These have better security built-in. If you cannot move off out-of-date platforms and applications straight away, there are short term steps you can take to improve your position. See NCSC Guidance:  <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/mobile-device-guidance/managing-the-risks-from-obsolete-products" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/mobile-device-guidance/managing-the-risks-from-obsolete-products</u></a></li>
<li><strong>Restrict intruders' ability to move freely around your systems and networks</strong>. Pay particular attention to potentially vulnerable entry points such as third-party systems with onward access to your core network. During an incident, disable remote access from third-party systems until you are sure they are clean. See NCSC Guidance: <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/preventing-lateral-movement" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/preventing-lateral-movement</u></a> and <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/assessing-supply-chain-security" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/assessing-supply-chain-security</u></a><u>.</u></li>
<li><strong>Deploy a host-based intrusion detection system</strong>. A variety of products are available, free and paid-for, to suit different needs and budgets.</li>
<li><strong>Further information</strong>: Invest in preventing malware-based attacks across various scenarios.  See NCSC Guidance: <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/mitigating-malware-and-ransomware-attacks" target="_blank"><u>https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/mitigating-malware-and-ransomware-attacks</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<h4><strong>Disclaimer </strong> </h4>
<p>This report draws on information derived from NCSC and industry sources. Any NCSC findings and recommendations made have not been provided with the intention of avoiding all risks and following the recommendations will not remove all such risk. Ownership of information risks remains with the relevant system owner at all times. Any reference to specific commercial entities, products, processes, or services by service mark, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by co-sealers. UK readers should refer to the NCSC website for information about <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/section/products-services/assured-services" target="_blank"><u>NCSC assured services</u></a>. </p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>This information is exempt under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) and may be exempt under other UK information legislation.  </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>Refer any FOIA queries to <a href="mailto:ncscinfoleg@ncsc.gov.uk" target="_blank"><u>ncscinfoleg@ncsc.gov.uk</u></a>.  </p>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW242856196 BCX8">
<p>All material is UK Crown Copyright © </p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Improve Router Hygiene to Protect Against Russian State-Sponsored Targeting]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Russian Government-Sponsored Activity Targets Poorly Configured and Vulnerable Devices Across Critical Sectors
Executive summary
Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) Center 16 cyber actors continue to exploit poorly configured and vulnerable networking devices worldwide, opportunistically compr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693346/sicherheitsluecken/improve-router-hygiene-to-protect-against-russian-state-sponsored-targeting/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693346/sicherheitsluecken/improve-router-hygiene-to-protect-against-russian-state-sponsored-targeting/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:51:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russian Government-Sponsored Activity Targets Poorly Configured and Vulnerable Devices Across Critical Sectors</p>
<h2><strong>Executive summary</strong></h2>
<p>Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) Center 16 cyber actors continue to exploit poorly configured and vulnerable networking devices worldwide, opportunistically compromising multiple critical infrastructure sector networks. This joint Cybersecurity Advisory (CSA) builds on FBI’s <a href="https://www.ic3.gov/PSA/2025/PSA250820" target="_blank">Russian Government Cyber Actors Targeting Networking Devices, Critical Infrastructure</a> Public Service Announcement of the decade-plus FSB Center 16 cyber activity by providing additional tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) to enable defenders to more fully understand and counter the threat. [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Work1">1</a>] </p>
<p>This CSA is being released by the following authoring and co-sealing agencies: </p>
<ul type="square">
<li>United States National Security Agency (NSA)</li>
<li>United States Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)</li>
<li>United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)</li>
<li>United States Department of Defense Cyber Crime Center (DC3)</li>
<li>Australian Signals Directorate’s Australian Cyber Security Centre (ASD’s ACSC)</li>
<li>Communications Security Establishment Canada’s (CSE’s) Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (Cyber Centre)</li>
<li>New Zealand National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-NZ)</li>
<li>United Kingdom National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-UK)</li>
<li>Czech Republic National Cyber and Information Security Agency (NÚKIB)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Foot1"><sup>1</sup></a> </li>
<li>Danish Defence Intelligence Service (DDIS)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Foot2"><sup>2 </sup></a></li>
<li>Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service (EFIS)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Foot3"><sup>3</sup></a> </li>
<li>Estonian Information System Authority (RIA)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Foot4"><sup>4</sup></a></li>
<li>Finnish Defence Intelligence (FDI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Foot5"><sup>5</sup></a></li>
<li>Finnish Security and Intelligence Service (SUPO)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Foot6"><sup>6</sup></a></li>
<li>French National Cybersecurity Agency (ANSSI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Foot7"><sup>7</sup></a></li>
<li>Italian External Intelligence and Security Agency (AISE)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Foot8"><sup>8 </sup></a></li>
<li>Italian Internal Intelligence and Security Agency (AISI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Foot9"><sup>9</sup></a></li>
<li>The Military Counterintelligence Service of Poland (SKW)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Foot10"><sup>10 </sup></a></li>
<li>Sweden National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-SE)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Foot11"><sup>11 </sup></a></li>
</ul>
<p>The authoring and co-sealing agencies strongly urge device owners and network defenders to take mitigation and remediation actions against Russian government-sponsored exploitation of vulnerable routers.</p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/Figure%201%20FSB%20Center%2016%20activity%20and%20recommended%20mitigation%20actions.png?itok=oYxdyna4" width="1024" height="576" alt="Adversary Techniques and corresponding Mitigation Actions as described in the Technical details and Mitigation actions sections.">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption">Figure 1: FSB Center 16 activity and recommended mitigation actions</figcaption>
  </figure>
<p>Download the PDF version of this report:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://media.defense.gov/2026/Jul/09/2003959498/-1/-1/0/CSA_IMPROVE_ROUTER_HYGIENE.PDF" target="_blank">Improve Router Hygiene to Protect Against Russian State-Sponsored Targeting</a> (PDF, 816KB)</li>
</ul>
<h2><strong>Cybersecurity industry tracking </strong></h2>
<p>The cybersecurity industry provides overlapping cyber threat intelligence, indicators of compromise (IOCs), and mitigation recommendations related to this activity. Although not all encompassing, the following list contains the most notable threat group names commonly used within the cybersecurity community related to this activity: </p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Berserk Bear </li>
<li>Energetic Bear</li>
<li>Crouching Yeti </li>
<li>Dragonfly</li>
<li>Ghost Blizzard</li>
<li>Static Tundra</li>
</ul>
<p>Note: Cybersecurity companies have different methods of tracking and attributing cyber actors, and this list may not provide a 1:1 correlation to the authoring agencies’ understanding for all activity related to these groupings.</p>
<h2><strong>Targeting details</strong></h2>
<p>Critical infrastructure sectors most at risk from the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) Center 16 cyber actors’ targeting include:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Communications,</li>
<li>Defense Industrial Base,</li>
<li>Energy,</li>
<li>Financial Services,</li>
<li>Government Services and Facilities, especially organizations at the state and local level, and</li>
<li>Healthcare and Public Health.</li>
</ul>
<h2><strong>Technical details</strong></h2>
<p><strong>Note: </strong>This advisory uses the <a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/matrices/enterprise/" target="_blank">MITRE ATT&amp;CK® Matrix for Enterprise</a><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Foot12"><sup>12</sup></a> framework, version 19. See <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#AppA"><strong>Appendix A</strong></a> for tables of the activity mapped to MITRE ATT&amp;CK tactics and techniques. This advisory also uses MITRE DEFEND<sup>TM</sup> version 1.4.0.</p>
<p>The Russian FSB Center 16 cyber actors primarily use scanning to identify poorly configured networking devices, primarily routers, for exploitation. The actors scan for Internet IP ranges with active Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) agents that accept common or default community strings for authentication [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1595/001/" target="_blank">T1595.001</a>, <a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1595/002/" target="_blank">T1595.002</a>]. These scans, run via proxies, consist of SNMP Set-Requests from a spoofed IP address [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/" target="_blank">T1027</a>] containing Object Identifiers (OIDs) that instruct the SNMP agent on poorly configured networking devices to [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1569/" target="_blank">T1569</a>, <a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1602/001/" target="_blank">T1602.001</a>, <a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1090/" target="_blank">T1090</a>]:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Copy its configuration to a file, often called “config.bkp” or “output.txt” [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1003/" target="_blank">T1003</a>, <a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1602/002/" target="_blank">T1602.002</a>].</li>
<li>Transfer the file, typically using Trivial File Transfer Protocol (TFTP), to an actor-controlled leased virtual private server (VPS) or compromised FTP server [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1583/003/" target="_blank">T1583.003</a>, <a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1090/" target="_blank">T1090</a>, <a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1071/" target="_blank">T1071</a>, <a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/" target="_blank">T1048</a>].</li>
</ul>
<p>While SNMP scanning is the primary method the actors use to discover and exploit poorly configured networking devices, they occasionally exploit common vulnerabilities and exposures (CVEs) in Cisco devices, Cisco’s Smart Install (SMI) functionality, and web portals to manage network devices. The actors previously exploited at least the following CVEs [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1584/008/" target="_blank">T1584.008</a>, <a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1588/005/" target="_blank">T1588.005</a>, <a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1190/" target="_blank">T1190</a>, <a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1068/" target="_blank">T1068</a>]: </p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-0171" target="_blank">CVE-2018-0171</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-4128" target="_blank">CVE-2008-4128</a><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Foot13"><sup>13</sup></a></li>
</ul>
<p>Many of these TTPs overlap with activity by other malicious cyber actors, such as <a href="https://media.defense.gov/2025/Aug/22/2003786665/-1/-1/0/CSA_COUNTERING_CHINA_STATE_ACTORS_COMPROMISE_OF_NETWORKS.PDF" target="_blank">Salt Typhoon</a>. Even though this CSA focuses on Russian FSB Center 16 cyber activity, the mitigations below should detect and counter these and similar TTPs used by other actors.</p>
<h2><strong>Mitigation actions</strong></h2>
<p>The authoring agencies highly recommend network defenders implement the following mitigations to harden networks against this exploitation:</p>
<ul>
<li>Disable Cisco Smart Install on all devices [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ApplicationConfigurationHardening" target="_blank">D3-ACH</a>]. [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Work2">2</a>]</li>
<li>Use SNMPv3 with “authPriv” configured to the most modern encryption standard that is supported by the device instead of SNMPv1 or SNMPv2 [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ApplicationConfigurationHardening" target="_blank">D3-ACH</a>]. [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Work3">3</a>]
<ul>
<li>Disable SNMPv1 and SNMPv2. These are legacy protocols and should no longer be needed on current devices. If they are necessary, change all community strings from defaults and only allow read-only community strings rather than read-write access.</li>
<li>SNMPv3 adds strong authentication and data encryption that are unavailable in SNMPv1 and v2. SNMPv3 replaces clear text shared passwords, known as community strings, with more securely encoded parameters, and authenticates and encrypts data [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:MessageAuthentication" target="_blank">D3-MAN</a>, <a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:MessageEncryption" target="_blank">D3-MENCR</a>].</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Use strong, unique passwords for local accounts on network devices and configure credentials to be stored securely to prevent reuse of compromised passwords [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:CredentialHardening" target="_blank">D3-CH</a>].
<ul>
<li>Cisco devices protect passwords in the configuration file using different hashing types. Use hashing type 8 for user credentials. Avoid using hashing type 0, 4, and 7 as they are insecure or store passwords in plaintext in the configuration file. [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Work4">4</a>]</li>
<li>Monitor for unusual credentials that do not conform to standard organizational naming conventions [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:PlatformMonitoring" target="_blank">D3-PM</a>]. </li>
<li> Monitor for and alert on logins using local accounts. Local accounts should only be used in emergency situations when accounts supported by centralized authentication servers are unavailable. Centralized authentication to network devices should support multi-factor authentication where feasible. [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Work3">3</a>]</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Monitor and restrict access to SNMP OIDs using a Management Information Base (MIB) allow list [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ApplicationConfigurationHardening" target="_blank">D3-ACH</a>]. [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Work5">5</a>] Reference the vendor-specific MIB for the network devices and monitor OIDs for indications of reconnaissance or misconfiguration in logs or intrusion detection systems (IDS). IDS rules should be written for inbound SNMP Set-Requests that contain OIDs targeting sensitive device data [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:PlatformMonitoring" target="_blank">D3-PM</a>].<br>
<ul type="square">
<li>Example OIDs include:
<ul>
<li>1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.96.1.1 (Cisco Config Copy)</li>
<li>1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.96.1.1.1.1.5 (Config Copy Server Address, value for this OID is where the configuration file is being sent to) </li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Restrict management protocols [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficFiltering" target="_blank">D3-NTF</a>].
<ul>
<li>Use Access Control Lists (ACLs) to only allow management protocols, such as SNMP, from management devices, preferably on an out-of-band network. [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Work3">3</a>]</li>
<li>On edge firewalls and devices deny all external communications on the following ports unless mission critical, with strict monitoring if blocking is not feasible:
<ul>
<li>User Datagram Protocol (UDP) port 69 (TFTP) </li>
<li>Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) port 4786 (SMI)</li>
<li>UDP ports 161 and 162 (SNMP)</li>
<li>TCP/UDP ports 10161 and 10162 (SNMPv3)</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Update network device software and firmware images, especially to patch known vulnerabilities, and upgrade end-of-life devices to supported ones. <br>
<ul type="square">
<li>Use an attack surface management service to identify and secure Internet-facing systems with weak configurations and known vulnerabilities [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkVulnerabilityAssessment" target="_blank">D3-NVA</a>].
<ul>
<li>U.S.-based federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial governments and U.S. critical infrastructure organiztions should consider signing up for CISA’s no-cost <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cyber-hygiene-services">Cyber Hygiene services</a>.</li>
<li>U.S. Defense Industrial Base organizations should consider signing up for <a href="https://www.nsa.gov/About/Cybersecurity-Collaboration-Center/DIB-Cybersecurity-Services/" target="_blank">NSA’s DIB Cybersecurity Services</a>.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h2><strong>Resources</strong></h2>
<p><strong>United States:</strong></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/topics/cyber-threats-and-advisories/advanced-persistent-threats/russia">Russia Threat Overview and Advisories</a></li>
<li><a href="https://media.defense.gov/2022/Jun/15/2003018261/-1/-1/0/CTR_NSA_NETWORK_INFRASTRUCTURE_SECURITY_GUIDE_20220615.PDF" target="_blank">Network Infrastructure Security Guide</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Canada:</strong></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><a href="https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/guidance/routers-cyber-security-best-practices-itsap80019" target="_blank">Routers cyber security best practices (ITSAP.80.019)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/guidance/security-considerations-edge-devices-itsm80101" target="_blank">Security considerations for edge devices (ITSM.80.101)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/guidance/guidance-securely-configuring-network-protocols-itsp40062" target="_blank">Guidance on securely configuring network protocols (ITSP.40.062)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/guidance/baseline-security-requirements-network-security-zones-version-20-itsp80022" target="_blank">Baseline security requirements for network security zones (ITSP.80.022)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/guidance/top-10-it-security-actions-protect-internet-connected-networks-and-information-itsm10089" target="_blank">Top 10 IT security actions to protect Internet-connected networks and information (ITSM.10.089)</a></li>
</ul>
<h2><strong>Works cited</strong></h2>
<p>[<a class="ck-anchor">1</a>] FBI. Russian Government Cyber Actors Targeting Networking Devices, Critical Infrastructure. Alert Number: I-082025-PSA. 2025. <a href="https://www.ic3.gov/PSA/2025/PSA250820" target="_blank">https://www.ic3.gov/PSA/2025/PSA250820</a></p>
<p>[<a class="ck-anchor">2</a>] NSA. Cisco Smart Install Protocol Misuse. 2017. <a href="https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jul/16/2002157833/-1/-1/0/CSA-CISCO-SMART-INSTALL-PROTOCOL-MISUSE.PDF" target="_blank">https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jul/16/2002157833/-1/-1/0/CSA-CISCO-SMART-INSTALL-PROTOCOL-MISUSE.PDF</a></p>
<p>[<a class="ck-anchor">3</a>] NSA. Network Infrastructure Security Guide. 2023. <a href="https://media.defense.gov/2022/Jun/15/2003018261/-1/-1/0/CTR_NSA_NETWORK_INFRASTRUCTURE_SECURITY_GUIDE_20220615.PDF" target="_blank">https://media.defense.gov/2022/Jun/15/2003018261/-1/-1/0/CTR_NSA_NETWORK_INFRASTRUCTURE_SECURITY_GUIDE_20220615.PDF</a></p>
<p>[<a class="ck-anchor">4</a>] NSA. Cybersecurity Information Sheet Cisco Password Types: Best Practices. 2022. <a href="https://media.defense.gov/2022/Feb/17/2002940795/-1/-1/0/CSI_CISCO_PASSWORD_TYPES_BEST_PRACTICES_20220217.PDF" target="_blank">https://media.defense.gov/2022/Feb/17/2002940795/-1/-1/0/CSI_CISCO_PASSWORD_TYPES_BEST_PRACTICES_20220217.PDF</a></p>
<p>[<a class="ck-anchor">5</a>] NSA. Cybersecurity Information Sheet: Reducing the Risk of Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Abuse. 2026. <a href="https://media.defense.gov/2026/Jul/09/2003959459/-1/-1/0/CSI_REDUCING_RISK_OF_SNMP_ABUSE.PDF" target="_blank">https://media.defense.gov/2026/Jul/09/2003959459/-1/-1/0/CSI_REDUCING_RISK_OF_SNMP_ABUSE.PDF</a></p>
<h2><strong>Footnotes</strong></h2>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"><sup>1</sup></a><sup>  </sup>Národní úřad pro kybernetickou a informační bezpečnost</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"><sup>2 </sup></a> Forsvarets Efterretningstjeneste</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"><sup>3</sup></a> Välisluureamet</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"><sup>4</sup></a> Riigi Infosüsteem Amet</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"><sup>5</sup></a> Sotilastiedustelu</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"><sup>6</sup></a> Suojelupoliisi</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"><sup>7</sup></a> Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d’information</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"><sup>8</sup></a> Agenzia Informazioni e Sicurezza Esterna</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"><sup>9</sup></a> Agenzia Informazioni e Sicurezza Interna</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"><sup>10</sup></a> Służba Kontrwywiadu Wojskowego</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"><sup>11</sup></a> Nationellt Cybersäkerhetscenter</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"><sup>12</sup></a><sup> </sup>MITRE and ATT&amp;CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE DEFEND is a trademark of the MITRE Corporation.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"><sup>13</sup></a> <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-4128" target="_blank">CVE-2008-4128</a> only affects end-of-life Cisco devices.</p>
<h2><strong>Disclaimer of Endorsement</strong></h2>
<p>The information and opinions contained in this document are provided "as is" and without any warranties or guarantees. Reference herein to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government, and this guidance shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.</p>
<h2><strong>Purpose</strong></h2>
<p>This document was developed in furtherance of the authoring agencies’ cybersecurity missions, including their responsibilities to identify and disseminate threats, and to develop and issue cybersecurity specifications and mitigations. This information may be shared broadly to reach all appropriate stakeholders.</p>
<h2><strong>Contact</strong></h2>
<p><strong>United States organizations</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>National Security Agency (NSA)</strong>
<ul>
<li>Cybersecurity Report Feedback: <a href="mailto:CybersecurityReports@nsa.gov">CybersecurityReports@nsa.gov</a> </li>
<li>Defense Industrial Base Inquiries and Cybersecurity Services: <a href="mailto:DIB_Defense@cyber.nsa.gov">DIB_Defense@cyber.nsa.gov</a> </li>
<li>Media Inquiries / Press Desk: NSA Media Relations: 443-634-0721, <a href="mailto:MediaRelations@nsa.gov">MediaRelations@nsa.gov</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)</strong> and<strong> Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)</strong>
<ul>
<li> U.S. organizations are encouraged to report suspicious or criminal activity related to information in this advisory to CISA via the agency’s <a href="https://myservices.cisa.gov/irf" title="Incident Reporting System">Incident Reporting System</a>, its 24/7 Operations Center (<a href="mailto:report@cisa.gov">report@cisa.gov</a> or 888-282-0870), or your <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices" target="_blank">local FBI field office</a>. When available, please include the following information regarding the incident: date, time, and location of the incident; type of activity; number of people affected; type of equipment user for the activity; the name of the submitting company or organization; and a designated point of contact. </li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>United States Department of Defense Cyber Crime Center (DC3)  </strong>
<ul>
<li>Defense Industrial Base Inquiries and Cybersecurity Services: <a href="mailto:DC3.DCISE@us.af.mil">DC3.DCISE@us.af.mil</a> </li>
<li>Defense Industrial Base mandatory cyber incident reporting as required by 10 U.S. Code Sections 391 and 393 and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 252.204-7012 is submitted at <a href="https://dibnet.dod.mil/" target="_blank" title="https://dibnet.dod.mil/">https://dibnet.dod.mil</a>.</li>
<li> Media Inquiries / Press Desk: <a href="mailto:DC3.Information@us.af.mil">DC3.Information@us.af.mil</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Australian organizations</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Australian Signals Directorate</strong>
<ul>
<li>Visit <a href="https://www.cyber.gov.au/about-us/about-asd-acsc/contact-us#no-back" target="_blank">cyber.gov.au</a> or call 1300 292 371 (1300 CYBER 1) to report cybersecurity incidents and access alerts and advisories.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Canadian organizations</strong></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (Cyber Centre), part of the Communications Security Establishment, encourages Canadian organizations to report cyber incidents and to strengthen the security of their networking devices. 
<ul>
<li>Report an incident or suspicious activity to the Cyber Centre by email at <a href="mailto:contact@cyber.gc.ca">contact@cyber.gc.ca</a>, online via the reporting tool <a href="https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/incident-management" target="_blank">Report a cyber incident - Canadian Centre for Cyber Security</a> or by phone at 1-833-CYBER-88 (1-833-292-3788).</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>New Zealand organizations</strong></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>New Zealand National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-NZ): <a href="mailto:info@ncsc.govt.nz">info@ncsc.govt.nz</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>United Kingdom organizations</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Report significant cyber security incidents to <a href="https://ncsc.gov.uk/report-an-incident" target="_blank">ncsc.gov.uk/report-an-incident</a> (monitored 24/7)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Estonia organizations</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service (EFIS): <a href="mailto:info@valisluureamet.ee">info@valisluureamet.ee</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Finnish organizations</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Finnish Security and Intelligence Service: <a href="https://supo.fi/en/contact" target="_blank">supo.fi/en/contact</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>French organizations</strong></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>French organizations are encouraged to report suspicious activity or incident related information found in this advisory by contacting ANSSI/CERT-FR at: <a href="mailto:cert-fr@ssi.gouv.fr">cert-fr@ssi.gouv.fr</a> or by phone at: 3218 or +33 9 70 83 32 18.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Italian Organizations</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Italian External Intelligence and Security Agency (AISE): 
<ul>
<li>Visit <a href="https://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/" target="_blank">https://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/</a> </li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Italian Internal Intelligence and Security Agency (AISI): 
<ul>
<li>Visit <a href="https://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/" target="_blank">https://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/</a> </li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h2><a class="ck-anchor"><strong>Appendix A: MITRE ATT&amp;CK tactics and techniques</strong></a></h2>
<p>See <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Table1"><strong>Table 1</strong></a> through <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Table10"><strong>Table 10</strong></a> for all the threat actor tactics and techniques referenced in this advisory.</p>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption>Table 1: Reconnaissance</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<p class="text-align-center"><a class="ck-anchor"></a><strong>Technique Title</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong></p>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Active Scanning: Scanning IP Blocks</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1595/001/" target="_blank">T1595.001</a></td>
<td>Scan range of IP addresses</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Active Scanning: Vulnerability Scanning</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1595/002/" target="_blank">T1595.002</a></td>
<td>Scan victims for vulnerabilities that can be used during targeting</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption>Table 2: Resource Development</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong></p>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Acquire Infrastructure: Virtual Private Servers </td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1583/003/" target="_blank">T1583.003</a> </td>
<td>Leverage VPS as infrastructure </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Compromise Infrastructure: Network Devices </td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1584/008/" target="_blank">T1584.008</a> </td>
<td>Compromise intermediate routers </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Obtain Capabilities: Exploits </td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1588/005/" target="_blank">T1588.005</a> </td>
<td>Use publicly available code to exploit vulnerable devices </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption>Table 3: Initial Access</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong></p>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Exploit Public-Facing Application </td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1190/" target="_blank">T1190</a> </td>
<td>Exploit publicly known CVEs </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Proxy</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1090/" target="_blank">T1090</a></td>
<td>Use a connection proxy to direct network traffic </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption>Table 4: Execution</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong></p>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>System Services</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1569/" target="_blank">T1569</a></td>
<td>Executing commands via SNMP</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption>Table 5: Privilege Escalation</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong></p>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Exploitation for Privilege Escalation</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1068/" target="_blank">T1068</a></td>
<td>Exploit publicly known CVEs for escalated privileges</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption>Table 6: Stealth</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong></p>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Obfuscated Files or Information</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/" target="_blank">T1027</a></td>
<td>Obfuscate source IP addresses in system logs, as actions may be recorded as originating from local IP addresses</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption>Table 7: Credential Access</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong></p>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>OS Credential Dumping</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1003/" target="_blank">T1003</a></td>
<td>Collect router configuration with weak Cisco Type 7 passwords and Type 0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption>Table 8: Collection</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong></p>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Data from Configuration Repository: SNMP (MIB Dump) </td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1602/001/" target="_blank">T1602.001</a> </td>
<td>Target MIB to collect network information via SNMP </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Data from Configuration Repository: Network Device Configuration Dump</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1602/002/" target="_blank">T1602.002</a></td>
<td>Acquire credentials by collecting network device configurations</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption>Table 9: Command and Control</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong></p>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Proxy </td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1090/" target="_blank">T1090</a> </td>
<td>Use VPS for C2 </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Application Layer Protocol </td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1071/" target="_blank">T1071</a> </td>
<td>Open and expose a variety of different services, including TFTP and FTP</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption>Table 10: Exfiltration</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<p class="text-align-center"><a class="ck-anchor"></a><strong>Technique Title</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong></p>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol</td>
<td><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/" target="_blank">T1048</a></td>
<td>Exfiltrating over a different protocol than that of the existing command and control channel. </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2><strong>Appendix B: MITRE D3FEND countermeasures</strong></h2>
<p>See <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#Table11"><strong>Table 11</strong></a> for a mapping of several of the cybersecurity countermeasures mentioned in this advisory.</p>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption>Table 11: MITRE D3FEND Countermeasures</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<p class="text-align-center"><a class="ck-anchor"></a><strong>Countermeasure Title</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong></p>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Description</strong></p>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Application Configuration Hardening</td>
<td><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ApplicationConfigurationHardening" target="_blank">D3-ACH</a></td>
<td>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Use SNMPv3 and disable SNMPv1 and SNMPv2. </li>
<li>Use SNMP allowlisting to restrict access to OIDs and MIBs. </li>
<li>Disable Cisco Smart Install.</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Message Authentication</td>
<td><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:MessageAuthentication" target="_blank">D3-MAN</a></td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>Use SNMPv3 with strong authentication.</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Message Encryption</td>
<td><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:MessageEncryption" target="_blank">D3-MENCR</a></td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>Use SNMPv3 to encrypt payloads.</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Credential Hardening</td>
<td><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:CredentialHardening" target="_blank">D3-CH</a></td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>Use strong, unique passwords and store them securely.</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Platform Monitoring</td>
<td><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:PlatformMonitoring" target="_blank">D3-PM</a></td>
<td>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Monitor for unusual credentials. </li>
<li>Monitor SNMP Set-Requests for OIDs targeting sensitive device data.</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Network Traffic Filtering</td>
<td><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficFiltering" target="_blank">D3-NTF</a></td>
<td>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Use ACLs to only allow management protocols from management devices. </li>
<li>Block TFTP, SMI, and SNMP at edge firewalls.</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Network Vulnerability Assessment</td>
<td><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkVulnerabilityAssessment" target="_blank">D3-NVA</a></td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>Use an attack surface management service.</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Firefox Nightly: Backup for a Rainy Day – These Weeks in Firefox: Issue 202]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Highlights

The profile backup mechanism has been enabled by default for all desktop platforms in Nightly, as well as Beta! The current plan is to have this ride out to Firefox 151 for Windows, macOS and Linux on May 18th!

This feature, when enabled, will create a copy of your profile data in th...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693295/tools/firefox-nightly-backup-for-a-rainy-day-these-weeks-in-firefox-issue-202/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693295/tools/firefox-nightly-backup-for-a-rainy-day-these-weeks-in-firefox-issue-202/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Highlights</h3>
<ul>
<li>The profile backup mechanism has been enabled by default for all desktop platforms in Nightly, as well as Beta! The current plan is to have this ride out to Firefox 151 for Windows, macOS and Linux on May 18th!
<ul>
<li>This feature, when enabled, will create a copy of your profile data in the background and store it in a single file on your file system that you can restore from.</li>
<li>You will be able to manage this feature in Settings under Sync (for now)
<ul>
<li><a href="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image6.png"><img alt="Firefox settings page showing the Backup feature in dark mode. Backup is enabled, with details of the most recent backup and a “Backup now” button. The page displays the backup file name and a backup location folder path, along with “Choose…” and “Show in folder” buttons. A “Sensitive data” section includes an option to back up passwords and payment methods with encryption, and a disabled “Change password” button." class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2074" height="517" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image6.png" width="657"></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a href="https://support.mozilla.org/kb/firefox-backup">You can read more about the feature here</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>As followups to the recent addition to the WebExtension tabs API to <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/WebExtensions/Working_with_the_Tabs_API#working_with_tab_split_views">support the new SplitView tabs feature</a>, tabs.group() and tabs.ungroup() have been fixed to work correctly with split view tabs, and fixed split views being prepended instead of appended to tab groups when adopted into a new window –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029099"> Bug 2029099</a> /<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029534"> Bug 2029534</a></li>
<li>Adaptive autofill has been enabled on Nightly.
<ul>
<li>Previously, autofill only completed domains (e.g. typing red autofilled<a href="http://reddit.com/"> reddit.com</a>). Now it can also complete full URLs for pages you visit often (e.g. red →<a href="http://reddit.com/r/firefox"> reddit.com/r/firefox</a>), learning from what you actually click in the address bar. If a suggestion isn’t helpful, you can now dismiss it so autofill learns what not to show you too.
<ul>
<li>If you run into issues or have feedback, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Firefox&amp;component=Address+Bar">you can file a bug here</a>!</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=293943">Markus Stange [:mstange]</a> implemented dynamic toolbar on top in RDM (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1978145">#1978145</a>), but also implemented some static skeleton UI so it’s closer to what we actually have in Firefox for Android
<ul>
<li>dynamic toolbar is behind a pref: devtools.responsive.dynamicToolbar.enabled</li>
<li>it can be put on top by setting devtools.responsive.dynamicToolbar.onTop, otherwise it’s at the bottom</li>
<li><a href="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image1.png"><img alt="Firefox Responsive Design Mode on Desktop displaying the Mozilla homepage in a mobile viewport. The toolbar at the top shows a simulated Android device (including the dynamic toolbar) with a viewport size of 376 × 464 pixels and a device pixel ratio of 3. The page content is shown in French, featuring the Mozilla logo, a “Menu” link, a “Pause animation” button, and the headline “Bienvenue chez Mozilla” with accompanying text about trusted technology and digital rights." class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2069" height="1113" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image1.png" width="882"></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Friends of the Firefox team</h3>
<h3><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?title=Resolved%20bugs%20(excluding%20employees)&amp;quicksearch=958957%2C1876109%2C1997388%2C2000797%2C1950995%2C1986020%2C2018272%2C2018276%2C2021681%2C2027969%2C2022115%2C1999012%2C2016058%2C2026585%2C2023913%2C2028167%2C2028293%2C2028927%2C1998002%2C2011343%2C1997925%2C2026574%2C2029398%2C2029684%2C1948019%2C2008756%2C2022601%2C2026032%2C2030428%2C1968244%2C1975391%2C944228%2C1962904%2C1977741%2C1997346%2C2027867%2C2030631%2C1807516%2C2030998%2C2030999%2C2015491%2C2028153%2C2028628%2C1978290%2C2008128%2C2024033%2C1883497%2C1984679%2C2030069%2C2031162%2C2031598%2C2012399%2C2031116%2C2031128%2C2031931%2C2031961%2C2033173%2C2032997%2C1919387%2C1947679%2C2027915%2C2032196%2C2019561%2C2024187%2C1392125%2C1993844%2C2027060%2C1983408%2C2034178%2C1873954%2C1875083%2C2008119%2C2008197%2C1628669%2C2031599%2C2033820">Resolved bugs (excluding employees)</a></h3>
<p><a href="https://github.com/niklasbaumgardner/NewContributorScraper">Script to find new contributors from bug list</a></p>
<h4>Volunteers that fixed more than one bug</h4>
<ul>
<li>Amin Amir</li>
<li>aoia7rz7l</li>
<li>Chukwuka Rosemary</li>
<li>DrSeed</li>
<li>Frédéric Wang Nélar</li>
<li>japandi</li>
<li>John Iweh</li>
<li>jonathancabera</li>
<li>Josh Aas</li>
<li>Keji Bakare</li>
<li>kofoworola shonuyi</li>
<li>konyhéa</li>
<li>liz</li>
<li>Mathew Hodson</li>
<li>Okhuomon Ajayi</li>
<li>Oluwatobi</li>
<li>ROSHAAN</li>
<li>Sam Johnson</li>
</ul>
<h4>New contributors (🌟 = first patch)</h4>
<ul>
<li> Anthony Mclamb:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027915"> Disable the legacy Edge migrator</a></li>
<li> Amin Amir
<ul>
<li>🌟<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031599">Fix browsingContext.sys.mjs to assign to #contextCreatedHandled instead of contextCreatedHandled</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033820">Fix missing WITHOUT ROWID SQLite performance optimization in SERPCategorization.sys.mjs</a></li>
<li>🌟 Amine Zroual:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1392125"> Omitted maxResults property not handled correctly in getRecentlyClosed</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>any1here:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031162"> install_sig_alt_stack incorrectly checks mmap’s return value</a></li>
<li>🌟 Armin Ulrich:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031598"> Fix MessageHandlerRegistry.sys.mjs calling getExistingMessageHandler with an unused second argument</a></li>
<li>japandi
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1628669">Cannot remove amazon.com from top sites list</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1977741">The height of the pinned tabs area should be responsive to the number of pins</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1986020">Use cenum for nsIHelperAppLauncherDialog reason constants to enable better typescript annotations</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Nathan Johnson [:narjoDev]:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1950995"> Remove browser.display.use_system_colors pref</a></li>
<li>DrSeed
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1962904">Firefox shows vertical tabs in new windows despite “Hide tabs and sidebar” setting</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1968244">The “Expand sidebar on hover” option is not kept after the vertical tabs are disabled and enabled again</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Keji Bakare:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2008756">Split view’s focus-outline is clipped on the right side of left tab</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031116">White space on the right side of left panel in split view</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>🌟 gotyaoi:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1807516"> Reload toolbar button is active on about:newtab</a></li>
<li>Itoro James:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2015491"> [A11y][Keyboard Navigation]Cancelling a note via Keyboard Navigation still saves it</a></li>
<li>John Iweh:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1997925"> The notification dot is not displayed if the tab is in a Split View</a></li>
<li>🌟 John Iweh:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027867"> sidebar-shown attribute remains when sidebar.revamp is false</a></li>
<li>🌟 jonathancabera:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2012399">The Move tab to Split View option is also displayed for the tabs that are within the Split View</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016058">A Note with long text (1003 characters) is saved by pressing ENTER even if the “Save” button is disabled</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2026032">Tab group guide line becomes disconnected under certain conditions related to split views in vertical tab mode</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Aloys:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2000797"> Remove logic that forces distribution language packs to be reinstalled when upgrading from Firefoxes older than 67</a></li>
<li>liz:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1875083">Create test to ensure maxRenderCountEstimate is never being set to Infinity in virtual-list component in Fx View</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2008119">Button accessible name does not convey its function: missing topic context (Settings dialog &gt; Topics dialog &gt; buttons Following/Unfollow/Blocked/Unblock)</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Mary cathline:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022115"> Tab Group Label does not respect touch density in vertical tab bar</a></li>
<li>🌟 Brandon Lucier:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030631"> Popups opened with window.open give window type normal instead of popup</a></li>
<li>karan68:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1997388"> [dialog] New Shortcut dialog needs a label/accessible name</a></li>
<li>🌟 Vector:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2008128"> Button does not programmatically indicate that it opens a dialog (Recent activity section &gt; story card &gt; ••• disclosure &gt; Delete from History button)</a></li>
<li>🌟 Osoble:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1876109"> Update font size and weight for synced tabs device name headers in Firefox View</a></li>
<li>konyhéa:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1873954">Add test for sync admin disabled to browser_syncedtabs_errors_firefoxview.js</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1883497">Check all second paramaters for TestUtils.waitForCondition in Fx View test files</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030069">Recently Closed Tabs, Tabs from Other Devices, and History pages should have Cmd / Ctrl + Click on a link open the link in the new background tab.</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Noble Chinonso: <a href="http://sidebartreeview.js/">#shouldHandleEvent in SidebarTreeView.js compares event.keyCode to string values, causing Home/End keys to never be handled</a></li>
<li>Pranjali Srivastava:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=944228"> Add a test to verify that the space above tabs is consistent across PB, LWT and sizemode (where appropriate)</a></li>
<li>Okhuomon Ajayi:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2018272">More spacing is needed between the tab note icon and the close icon on the tab</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2019561">The tabs in vertical mode collapsed state are positioned differently in Split View</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027060">Keep vertical split view tabs stacked vertically even when the sidebar is expanded when expand on hover is enabled</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029684">Vertical split view tabs can be too big or small when tabs are overflowing</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>🌟 Rishan:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030428"> Fix duplicated arrow function in browser_history_sidebar.js</a></li>
<li>Chukwuka Rosemary:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1948019">“Forget About This Site” context menu option missing from Firefox View history</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2026574">Long strings are not displayed properly on the about:opentabs page search filed</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2028153">Add test for Forget This Site option in Fxview history context menu.</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>ROSHAAN:
<ul>
<li>🌟<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2018276">Tab note background colour is incorrect for default light theme</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1997346"> [win/linux] The splitter between content areas does not match Figma spec</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2028927">Fix typo in OpenInTabsUtils.confirmOpenInTabs()</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Sameeksha:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2008197"> Disclosure button expanded/collapsed state not programmatically defined (Customize button)</a></li>
<li>kofoworola shonuyi:
<ul>
<li>🌟<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1999012">Actually hide or remove sidebar-shown attribute when in fullscreen.</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2028293">Add a test for checking sidebar-shown attribute in fullscreen mode</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>🌟 Sayd Mateen:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021681"> Page URL is displayed as tab name when page’s contains about:reader?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Oluwatobi:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1975391">Unable to delete selected history entries from sidebar</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1993844">Incorrect Sidebar button state/tooltip hover text</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023913">The city name heading level doesn’t follow the correct heading level order</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Nishchay [:nish]:<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031961"> Unable to add tabs to old closed tab groups (tabGroupState.splitViews is undefined)</a></li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<h3>Project Updates</h3>
<h4>Add-ons / Web Extensions</h4>
<h5>Addon Manager &amp; about:addons</h5>
<ul>
<li>In preparation for the Project Nova restyling of the about:addons page, we have refactored about:addons into separate per-component ES modules, splitting the monolithic aboutaddons.js and aboutaddons.html into 16 dedicated component files under components/ (with no behavior or UI changes) –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2032014"> Bug 2032014</a>
<ul>
<li>NOTE: if you have working on patches with changes to about:addons internals it is very likely you’ll need to rebase and solve merge conflicts hit on top of this refactoring, the internals are still largely the same as before but don’t hesitate to reach out to the Addons team if you have doubts / questions or need help to figure out how to adapt your patch of top of these changes</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h5>WebExtensions Framework</h5>
<ul>
<li>Fixed exportFunction to preserve the constructibility of the wrapped function instead of unconditionally making all exported functions implicitly as constructors –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033173"> Bug 2033173</a>
<ul>
<li>Thanks to Gregory Pappas for contributing this improvement to the Content Scripts’ Xray Wrappers helpers!</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Fixed a Firefox 151 regression where extension content scripts accessing location.ancestorOrigins caused subsequent page script reads of the same property to fail with “Permission denied”, breaking sites like Gmail –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2034329"> Bug 2034329</a>
<ul>
<li>Thanks to Simon Farre for promptly investigating and fixing this recent regression!</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h5>WebExtension APIs</h5>
<ul>
<li>Updated sessions.getRecentlyClosed() to remove the hardcoded cap when maxResults is omitted –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1392125"> Bug 1392125</a>
<ul>
<li>Shoutout to Amine Zroual for contributing this enhancement to the sessions WebExtensions API!</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h4>DevTools</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=750915">Artem Manushenkov</a> fixed an issue where autosuggestion popup was removing overridden indicators from properties in the Inspector (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1983408">#1983408</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=446257">Andrea Marchesini [:baku]</a> fix DevTools cookie header serialization for long cookies, which could lead to cookies not being visible in Netmonitor (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031299">#2031299</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=559949">Julian Descottes [:jdescottes]</a> fixed a toolbox crash that was happening we couldn’t find a localization file (e.g. when using a language pack on Nightly) (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2028930">#2028930</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=557153">Nicolas Chevobbe [:nchevobbe]</a> improved @container tooltip so it show the value of variables used in style()(<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030239">#2030239</a>), has enough contrast in dark mode (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033782">#2033782</a>) and contains a link to select the container (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031688">#2031688</a>)
<ul>
<li><a href="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image3.png"><img alt='Firefox Developer Tools showing a CSS @container style() rule in the Rules panel. A popover for a element displays container properties including "container-name: hello section-container", "container-type: inline-size", and the custom property "--w: 100px", while indicating that --secondary and --plouf are not set. Below, the container query uses nested var() fallbacks, and a CSS declaration previews the resolved value for background-color.' class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2071" height="532" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image3.png" width="1038"></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=656417">Hubert Boma Manilla (:bomsy)</a> is making good progress on migrating the Console to CodeMirror 6 (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2032758">#2032758</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2026569">#2026569</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h4>Fluent</h4>
<ul>
<li>We’re now at over 72% of our strings being Fluent! Got a component still using .properties? Convert when you can!</li>
<li><a href="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image5.png"><img alt="Stacked area chart titled “Are We Fluent Yet?” showing the number and type of localization strings available in Firefox from 2018 to 2026. The chart tracks Fluent strings (green), Properties strings (blue), DTD strings (pink), and a small number of INI strings. Over time, Fluent strings steadily increase while DTD and Properties strings decline. A tooltip at April 26, 2026 shows 10,372 Fluent strings, 3,997 Properties strings, and no remaining DTD or INC strings, illustrating Firefox’s ongoing migration to the Fluent localization system." class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2073" height="924" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image5.png" width="1509"></a></li>
</ul>
<h4>Migration Improvements</h4>
<ul>
<li>Thanks to dao for <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035009">fixing a recent alignment issue in the migration wizard dropdown</a></li>
<li>Thanks to volunteer contributor Anthony Mclamb for his patch that <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027915">disables the legacy EdgeHTML Edge migrator</a>! Once that finishes rolling out, presuming no surprises, we’ll go ahead and remove the migrator entirely.</li>
</ul>
<h4>New Tab Page</h4>
<ul>
<li>Nova for New Tab has ridden the trains to Beta! It will be enabled by default, globally, when Firefox 151 goes out to release on May 19th
<ul>
<li>It’s possible that we’ll do a train-hop coupled with an experiment to enable HNT Nova for a few clients a bit earlier.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2032213"> enabled Nova designs for New Tab</a>, rolling out the updated layout, widgets, and customization panel behind HNT Nova flags.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2033165"> fixed the Nova content feed to render the intended four‑column layout</a> by correcting CSS grid breakpoints.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2033264"> resolved a first‑load failure in the Weather widget</a> by fixing init order and fetch timing, eliminating the “Oops” error.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2031707"> synchronized the Weather toggle between about:preferences#home and the panel</a> via the shared showWeather pref to prevent desync.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2021460"> updated Nova grid focus order</a> to align tab flow with visual order for keyboard users.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2034620"> fixed critical UI issues in Lists and Timer widgets</a> covering overflow, controls, and layout stability.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2032462"> guarded document.dir access in Nova render paths</a> to avoid startup cache worker errors and improve startup stability.</li>
<li>Rolf<a href="https://bugzil.la/2031568"> added a new normalization method for the inferred interest vector</a> to stabilize topic relevance across sessions.</li>
<li>Rolf<a href="https://bugzil.la/2031569"> prevented unnecessary content refreshes during Pocket New Tab experiments</a>, reducing jank and bandwidth.</li>
<li>Sameeksha<a href="https://bugzil.la/2008197"> defined the Customize button’s expanded/collapsed state programmatically</a> using aria-expanded for better a11y.</li>
<li>liz<a href="https://bugzil.la/2008119"> clarified follow/unfollow/blocked button names with topic context</a> so screen readers announce clear actions.</li>
<li>Vector<a href="https://bugzil.la/2008128"> marked the Delete from History control as opening a dialog</a> via aria-haspopup=dialog for assistive tech.</li>
<li>Scott Downe<a href="https://bugzil.la/2034145"> fixed a regression that flipped the Wallpapers pref off</a>, restoring user selections.</li>
<li>Irene Ni<a href="https://bugzil.la/2033927"> corrected privacy link color and focus styles</a> for contrast and keyboard visibility.</li>
<li>Reem Hamoui<a href="https://bugzil.la/2030873"> added a wallpaper toggle reset in the Nova customization panel</a> so users can quickly restore default wallpapers without extra steps.</li>
<li>Reem Hamoui<a href="https://bugzil.la/2031669"> fixed the Customize pencil button to match the Nova spec</a>, aligning placement and iconography for visual consistency.</li>
<li>Dre<a href="https://bugzil.la/2032607"> updated the ‘Fresh new’ wallpapers copy</a> to a clearer, localized message for better comprehension.</li>
<li>Irene Ni<a href="https://bugzil.la/2033927"> fixed Nova privacy link color and focus styles</a> to meet contrast and focus ring guidelines, improving accessibility on New Tab.</li>
<li>Irene Ni<a href="https://bugzil.la/2034098"> adjusted Sponsored tile character limits</a> to prevent truncation/overflow, yielding cleaner titles across grid and wide tiles.</li>
<li>Scott Downe<a href="https://bugzil.la/2034145"> fixed a regression that flipped the Wallpapers user pref to false</a>, restoring wallpapers for affected users and preventing unintended disablement.</li>
<li>Reem Hamoui<a href="https://bugzil.la/2034688"> hooked the wallpaper check into the new toggle logic</a> so the Customization Panel accurately reflects wallpaper availability and state.</li>
<li>Irene Ni<a href="https://bugzil.la/2034912"> landed Nova UI updates for the Daily Briefing 3-pack card</a>, improving spacing, type scale, and tap targets.</li>
<li>Reem Hamoui<a href="https://bugzil.la/2030873"> added a wallpaper toggle reset in the Nova customization panel</a> so users can quickly restore default wallpapers without extra steps.</li>
<li>Reem Hamoui<a href="https://bugzil.la/2031669"> fixed the Customize pencil button to match the Nova spec</a>, aligning placement and iconography for visual consistency.</li>
<li>Dre<a href="https://bugzil.la/2032607"> updated the ‘Fresh new’ wallpapers copy</a> to a clearer, localized message for better comprehension.</li>
<li>Irene Ni<a href="https://bugzil.la/2033927"> fixed Nova privacy link color and focus styles</a> to meet contrast and focus ring guidelines, improving accessibility on New Tab.</li>
<li>Irene Ni<a href="https://bugzil.la/2034098"> adjusted Sponsored tile character limits</a> to prevent truncation/overflow, yielding cleaner titles across grid and wide tiles.</li>
<li>Scott Downe<a href="https://bugzil.la/2034145"> fixed a regression that flipped the Wallpapers user pref to false</a>, restoring wallpapers for affected users and preventing unintended disablement.</li>
<li>Reem Hamoui<a href="https://bugzil.la/2034688"> hooked the wallpaper check into the new toggle logic</a> so the Customization Panel accurately reflects wallpaper availability and state.</li>
<li>Irene Ni<a href="https://bugzil.la/2034912"> landed Nova UI updates for the Daily Briefing 3-pack card</a>, improving spacing, type scale, and tap targets.</li>
</ul>
<h4>Search and Urlbar</h4>
<ul>
<li>Marco has fixed a<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2034743"> couple</a> of<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1989632"> issues</a> with the places databases to try and improve stability. This should help with avoiding users losing bookmarks or favicons.</li>
<li>Work continues on the new separate search bar to improve the functionality, e.g.<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033231"> allowing middle click</a> to perform a search in a new tab,<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2032991"> avoiding performing a</a> search when adding a search engine.</li>
<li>Work also continues on the new Nova layouts.</li>
</ul>
<h4>Smart Window</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2032122">uplifted 10 bugs</a> to 150.0.1 dot release addressing initial user feedback from diary study and <a href="https://connect.mozilla.org/">Connect</a>
<ul>
<li>jump to bottom of conversation <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2028692">2028692</a></li>
<li>stop streaming button <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029204">2029204</a></li>
<li>back/forward navigation from assistant <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029229">2029229</a></li>
<li>dark mode for various chips <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2024499">2024499</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>search engine switching from smart bar <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021973">2021973</a></li>
<li>Nova styling within smart window <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2026794">2026794</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>Storybook/Reusable Components/Acorn Design System</h4>
<ul>
<li>Dustin converted moz-breadcrumb-group variables into JSON design tokens <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029181">Bug 2029181 – Convert moz-breadcrumb-group variables into JSON design tokens</a></li>
<li>Dustin converted moz-box-* variables into JSON design tokens <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029180">Bug 2029180 – Convert moz-box-* variables into JSON design tokens</a></li>
<li>Dustin converted moz-promo variables to JSON design tokens <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029190">Bug 2029190 – Convert moz-promo variables into JSON design tokens</a></li>
<li>Dustin converted moz-reorderable-list variables to JSON design tokens <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029191">Bug 2029191 – Convert moz-reorderable-list variables into JSON design tokens</a></li>
<li>Dustin converted moz-visual-picker variables to JSON design tokens <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029193">Bug 2029193 – Convert moz-visual-picker-item variables into JSON design tokens</a></li>
<li>Dustin updated browser-shared.css so it passes use-design-tokens <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022985">Bug 2022985 – Update browser-shared.css so it passes use-design-tokens</a></li>
<li>Dustin updated popup.css so it passes use-design-tokens <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022979">Bug 2022979 – Update popup.css so it passes use-design-tokens</a></li>
<li>Jon added opacity tokens and added opacity to use-design-tokens stylelint rule  <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1955325">Bug 1955325 – Create opacity tokens</a></li>
<li>Jon converted toolbar design tokens to JSON <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017970">Bug 2017970 – Convert toolbar design tokens to json</a></li>
<li>Anna fixed moz-select with panel-list drop-down size inconsistency <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2032365">Bug 2032365 – Applications Action drop-down menus sometimes have a different size when opened</a></li>
<li>Anna fixed issue with the disabled state of moz-radio component <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027123">Bug 2027123 – moz-radio disabled state cannot be changed while the moz-radio-group is disabled</a></li>
<li>Anna updated moz-button and moz-box-button components to prevent label corruption when accesskeys are present and the label changes.   <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022326">Bug 2022326 – moz-button with accesskey label becomes corrupted when l10nId updates dynamically</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>UX Fundamentals</h4>
<ul>
<li>The error pages shown when a server sends back an invalid response header or an unsupported content encoding now display accurate, context-specific messages. The invalid response header page also gained a helpful list of next steps. – <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027209">2027209</a></li>
<li>In progress: The error page illustrations are being replaced with new artwork, and the system now supports per-illustration size configuration, giving each image the ability to define its own appropriate dimensions. – <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031837">2031837</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>Settings Redesign</h4>
<ul>
<li>Tim converted settings related to Accessibility page to config-based pane <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1968116">Bug 1968116 – Convert settings related to Accessibility page to config-based settings</a></li>
<li>Benjamin converted Privacy &amp; Security page to the config-based pane <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1968112">Bug 1968112 – Convert settings related to Privacy &amp; Security page to config-based settings</a></li>
<li>Finn integrated Firefox Labs page into setting-pane config <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021047">Bug 2021047 – Integrate Firefox Labs page into setting-pane config</a></li>
<li>Anna converted Firefox Updates section to config-based prefs <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1990961">Bug 1990961 – Convert Firefox Updates section to config-based prefs</a></li>
<li>Mark Kennedy added moz-promo, that is welcoming users to the redesigned settings <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2015093">Bug 2015093 – Add a moz-promo to welcome users to the redesign</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image4.png"><img alt="The Firefox settings page in dark mode showing a notification banner that reads, “Same settings, new look!” The message further explains that the page has been reorganized to make settings easier to scan and explore, while keeping all existing settings unchanged. A “Got it” button appears below the message. The “AI Controls” section is visible underneath the banner." class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2072" height="559" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image4.png" width="1431"></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Anna added possibility to search for actions in the redesigned “Applications” section <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2020370">Bug 2020370 – It’s no longer possible to search for actions in the new “Applications” section</a></li>
<li>Anna fixed the Settings navbar layout breakage</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Firefox Nightly: More Kit, More Control – These Weeks in Firefox: Issue 203]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Highlights

James enabled adaptive autofill in Nightly for testing, which we believe should provide better results in the URL bar when doing autocomplete!
Jack updated the illustrations shown on some of our error pages to match the latest approved designs, giving users more polished artwork when ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693294/tools/firefox-nightly-more-kit-more-control-these-weeks-in-firefox-issue-203/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693294/tools/firefox-nightly-more-kit-more-control-these-weeks-in-firefox-issue-203/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Highlights</h3>
<ul>
<li>James <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2032547">enabled adaptive autofill in Nightly</a> for testing, which we believe should provide better results in the URL bar when doing autocomplete!</li>
<li>Jack <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031837">updated the illustrations shown on some of our error pages</a> to match the latest approved designs, giving users more polished artwork when the browser encounters connection or security errors!</li>
</ul>
<p><img alt="Internet connection error page with an adorable Kit illustration" class="aligncenter wp-image-2080 size-full" height="652" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image2-1.png" width="1584"></p>
<ul>
<li>Controls for the Memories feature <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2032998">can now be set during Smart Window onboarding</a></li>
</ul>
<p><img alt='Two radio button controls for the Smart Window Memories feature, including "Chats in Smart Window" and "Browsing across Firefox"' class="aligncenter wp-image-2078 size-full" height="546" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image4-1-e1780509799577.png" width="500"></p>
<p> </p>
<ul>
<li>We’ve disabled the CSS filter implicitly applied to WebExtension pageAction SVG icons across all release channels starting in Firefox 152, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016509">completing the deprecation</a>
<ul>
<li><b>NOTE:</b> The blog post published at<a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2026/04/23/webextensions-api-changes-firefox-149-152/"> WebExtensions API changes in Firefox 149-152</a> provides to extensions developers more details about this deprecation and links to the related MDN docs.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Friends of the Firefox team</h3>
<h4><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?title=Resolved%20bugs%20(excluding%20employees)&amp;quicksearch=2031599%2C2033820%2C2034178%2C1930213%2C2035355%2C1611643%2C2020302%2C2026007%2C2031015%2C2035252%2C2036528%2C411384%2C2033780%2C2036199%2C1812100%2C1898257%2C2030070%2C2030072">Resolved bugs (excluding employees)</a></h4>
<p><a href="https://github.com/niklasbaumgardner/NewContributorScraper">Script to find new contributors from bug list</a></p>
<h4>Volunteers that fixed more than one bug</h4>
<ul>
<li>Amin Amir</li>
<li>Pranjali Srivastava</li>
<li>Sam Johnson</li>
</ul>
<h4>New contributors (🌟 = first patch)</h4>
<ul>
<li> 🌟:23rd: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1812100">Regression: The new swipe-to-navigation indicator stucks for a moment, when deciding not to navigate the other page</a></li>
<li>🌟Akeem Omosanya: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035252">Remove commented-out code in SearchService.sys.mjs</a></li>
<li>Amin Amir:
<ul>
<li>🌟<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031599">Fix browsingContext.sys.mjs to assign to #contextCreatedHandled instead of contextCreatedHandled</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033820">Fix missing WITHOUT ROWID SQLite performance optimization in SERPCategorization.sys.mjs</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>🌟Sahaj: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031015">Suggest the default target language for translation after changing the detected source language</a></li>
<li>🌟JIANG Zhirui: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036199">Breakpad build failed on Windows using VS2026 due to removal of stdext</a></li>
<li> John Iweh: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030072">Add “Open in New Tab” and “Open in New Container Tab” options to the context menu for Tabs from Other Devices</a></li>
<li>Jak: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030070">Bookmarks and History – should respect the “When you open a link, image or media in a new tab, switch to it immediately” setting</a></li>
<li>🌟Andy [:rgbcmy]: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1611643">Autoplayed next video should also be PIP</a></li>
<li> konyhéa: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1930213">“Escape” key should collapse the expanded on hover sidebar launcher even if hover is still active.</a></li>
<li> Pranjali Srivastava:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1898257">Remove icon property from sidebar extensions</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2026007">Show language-agnostic SelectTranslations context menu item when the source and target languages are the same</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Project Updates</h3>
<h4>Add-ons / Web Extensions</h4>
<h5>Addon Manager &amp; about:addons</h5>
<ul>
<li>Fixed long-standing regression on the autocomplete and datalist popups for extension inline options pages on about:addons (introduced in Firefox 68 by<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1532724"> Bug 1532724</a>, fix shipping in Firefox 152) –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1595158"> Bug 1595158</a></li>
</ul>
<h5>WebExtensions Framework</h5>
<ul>
<li>Fixed access to web-accessible resources declared with &lt;all_urls&gt; from sandboxed documents (null-principal URLs), restoring extension redirects from the context-menu search flow, starting in Firefox 152 –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033905"> Bug 2033905</a></li>
</ul>
<h5>WebExtension APIs</h5>
<ul>
<li>Added exhaustive test coverage for tabs.move() against additional edge cases related to split-view tabs –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029092"> Bug 2029092</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>DevTools</h4>
<ul>
<li>Andreas Farre improved the Session History tab in the Application panel (still behind devtools.application.sessionHistory.enabled)
<ul>
<li>added support for remote debugging (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2014064">#2014064</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016121">#2016121</a>)</li>
<li>made sure that calls to History.replaceState are reflected in the UI (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2037359">#2037359</a>)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=559949">Julian Descottes [:jdescottes]</a> fixed the most frequent DevTools crash we were observing in Telemetry, adding a guard against IDBTransaction errors when retrieving breakpoints in the Debugger (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030260">#2030260</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=557153">Nicolas Chevobbe [:nchevobbe]</a> fixed the image preview tooltip for relative URLs images in constructed stylesheet (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035503">#2035503</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=559949">Julian Descottes [:jdescottes]</a> reduced the overhead we had because of network requests monitoring by only decoding response content when the user actually want to see the response (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2026228">#2026228</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h4>WebDriver</h4>
<ul>
<li>Amin Amir cleaned up an <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031599">incorrect variable assignment</a> in our browsingContext module.</li>
<li>Logan Rosen <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036603">updated stale references and broken links</a> in our documentation about Marionette.</li>
<li>Sameem improved the Marionette and WebDriver BiDi <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2020302">screenshot commands to enforce maximum allowed dimensions</a>.</li>
<li>Leo McArdle fixed <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030964">the regression in the “log.entryAdded” event, which lacked an error message in the “text” field for the messages of type “error”</a>.</li>
<li>Henrik Skupin fixed an issue in Marionette where <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033769">WebDriver:Navigate and WebDriver:Refresh did not handle errors</a> when the underlying navigation failed.</li>
<li>Henrik Skupin <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1839953">improved geckodriver to detect an early Firefox exit during startup on Android</a>, avoiding up to 60 seconds of unnecessary connection attempts.</li>
<li>Henrik Skupin updated the <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2028933">geckodriver CI build job to produce a universal macOS binary</a> supporting both x64 and aarch64.</li>
</ul>
<h4>Lint, Docs and Workflow</h4>
<ul>
<li>Sylvestre <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023411">ported some linters</a> (e.g. file-whitespace, test-manifest-toml, license, file-perm, rejected-words &amp; more) to Rust to help improve the runtime of the code review bot.</li>
<li>Dale has been working on migration to moz-src for <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2034040">customkeys</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035086">dom/quota</a> and <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035295">odom/geolocation</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://arewemozsrcyet.com/">https://arewemozsrcyet.com/</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h4>New Tab Page</h4>
<ul>
<li>We did our first region-specific trainhop on May 11th (just 15% of the US), and turned on HNT Nova (and sometimes Widgets) for those clients to get some advance-data of its behaviour in the wild! A note that HNT Nova gets turned on for everybody when Firefox 151 ships on May 19th.
<ul>
<li>We’ll be launching a similar experiment in the DE, probably on May 12th, also at 15% population.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Most of the team is heads down building out a sports-tracking widget, attempting to get that ready in time to be generally available for the upcoming World Cup event.</li>
<li>Dre landed a new world clock widget, which is currently off by default, but pretty snazzy!</li>
</ul>
<p><img alt="World clock widget in New Tab featuring different time zones for YTO, BER, SYD, and LAX." class="aligncenter wp-image-2079 size-full" height="162" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image3-1.png" width="346"></p>
<h4>Search and Urlbar</h4>
<ul>
<li>Nova (URL Bar Design Refresh)
<ul>
<li>Drew and Daisuke continued their work on <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2015612">Nova styling for the Address bar</a> (input and view).</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Search and Suggest
<ul>
<li>Drew finalized two bugs for World Cup and sports suggestions, which were landed and uplifted: one to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035322">update the localization string for scheduled games</a> and another to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2034350">show both teams’ icons in suggestions</a>. Drew also landed and uplifted a fix for <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035353">rich search suggestion icons being forced into a square aspect ratio</a>.</li>
<li>Standard8 updated Ecosia favicons to the latest branding, including QA testing and publishing.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Settings Redesign (SRD)
<ul>
<li>Stephanie landed a test to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2021512">ensure search suggestion settings are hidden when quicksuggest is disabled</a>, as well as a patch to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031341">resolve TypeScript issues</a> in search.mjs, and is adding test coverage to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2007397">confirm removed search engines are not displayed in the default engines dropdown</a>.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>General URL Bar and Component Updates
<ul>
<li>Daisuke landed implementation of the <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1893083">context menu on URL bar results</a>, and a fix to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2020177">show the loading URL in the URL bar when starting up with a homepage</a>.
<ul>
<li>Marco is working on several tasks, including a <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1756564">PDF download / focus stealing issue</a> and <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1924124">allowing arrays to be bound in Sqlite.sys.mjs</a>. Marco also worked on fixes related to Places, such as <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2034743">avoiding replacing the favicons database if it is not corrupt</a>.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Standard8 finalized the <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2028423">URL bar test manifest split</a>. Standard8 also <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016401">upgraded us to TypeScript 6</a>.</li>
<li>Moritz landed a fix for URL bar abandonment telemetry being recorded when clicking an engine in the unified search button popup (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2032973">Bug 2032973</a>), which was also uplifted. Moritz also <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2034507">simplified search mode switcher item activation in tests</a>, and made it so that <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036030">the unified search button popup closes when installing an open search engine</a>.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h4>Smart Window</h4>
<ul>
<li>natural language starting with tab close/undo <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035343">2035343</a> with expandable action log <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031508">2031508</a></li>
</ul>
<p><img alt="Tab close and undo actions in Smart Window accompanied by an expandable log of actions taken" class="aligncenter wp-image-2077 size-full" height="256" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image1-1.png" width="220"></p>
<ul>
<li>assistant rendering feedback up/down <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2032994">2032994</a> and markdown table <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027029">2027029</a></li>
<li>nova styling blur <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027877">2027877</a> and suggestions <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2026823">2026823</a></li>
<li>accessibility screen reader <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2028676">2028676</a> and keyboard focus <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2037565">2037565</a></li>
<li>optimize conversation starters extra requests <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030005">2030005</a> and caching <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033430">2033430</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>Storybook/Reusable Components/Acorn Design System</h4>
<ul>
<li>Nova token updates occasionally, focused on SRD</li>
</ul>
<h4>UX Fundamentals</h4>
<ul>
<li>Added support for the “SEC_ERROR_CA_CERT_INVALID” certificate error to the Felt Privacy error pages. – <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035942">2035942</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>Settings Redesign</h4>
<ul>
<li>Settings redesign is being tested and will hopefully go out in Firefox 152!</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Firefox Nightly: Giving You More Control – These Weeks in Firefox: Issue 204]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Highlights

Maxx Crawford added a pref to hide the New Tab logo so users can opt out of branding without altering page layout or resorting to CSS overrides.
Harshit enabled video overlay detection in Nightly 153, allowing you to use the context menu to control videos on more pages! We plan on let...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693293/tools/firefox-nightly-giving-you-more-control-these-weeks-in-firefox-issue-204/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693293/tools/firefox-nightly-giving-you-more-control-these-weeks-in-firefox-issue-204/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Highlights</h3>
<ul>
<li>Maxx Crawford <a href="https://bugzil.la/2041708">added a pref to hide the New Tab logo </a>so users can opt out of branding without altering page layout or resorting to CSS overrides.</li>
<li>Harshit <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2041819">enabled video overlay detection</a> in Nightly 153, allowing you to use the context menu to control videos on more pages! We plan on letting this ride out in Firefox 153.
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/DXH8Rd6EcWo/">You can try it out on this Instagram reel</a> in Nightly</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><img alt="Firefox context menu video controls like Pause, Unmute, Speed and Loop." class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2081" height="431" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image2-2.png" width="480"></p>
<ul>
<li>A note to WebExtension authors – as part of a <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2026/04/23/webextensions-api-changes-firefox-149-152/">planned deprecation announced last month</a>, executeScript and insertCSS are now restricted from moz-extension pages starting in Firefox 152 –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2015559"> Bug 2015559</a></li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=557153">Nicolas Chevobbe [:nchevobbe]</a> added support and debugging for modern attr()(which is <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038939">enabled on Nightly</a>) (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2014751">#2014751</a>)</li>
</ul>
<p><img alt="Tooltip in Firefox DevTools for mismatched syntax with attr()" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2082" height="164" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image1-2.png" width="872"></p>
<h3>Friends of the Firefox team</h3>
<h4><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?title=Resolved%20bugs%20(excluding%20employees)&amp;quicksearch=1717176%2C2031328%2C2038948%2C2011485%2C1455294%2C2035084%2C2039455%2C2036767%2C2039878%2C2013176%2C2022414%2C2036237%2C2036578%2C2041612%2C1262773&amp;list_id=17986996">Resolved bugs (excluding employees)</a></h4>
<p><a href="https://github.com/niklasbaumgardner/NewContributorScraper">Script to find new contributors from bug list</a></p>
<h4>Volunteers that fixed more than one bug</h4>
<ul>
<li>Sam Johnson</li>
<li>Sebastian Zartner [:sebo]</li>
</ul>
<h4>New contributors (🌟 = first patch)</h4>
<ul>
<li>Immaculate Atim: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2022414">Switch to using an array instead of an object string for browser.backup.enabled_on.profiles</a></li>
<li>liz: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2011485">Screenshots overlay visible on both splitview browsers</a></li>
<li>🌟 Rahman Mahmutović [:r_m]: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1717176">Can’t change content in box model in inspector for box-sizing:border-box elements</a></li>
<li>Takeru Mitsumori: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038948">Fix typo in ID name about-translations-swap-langauges-icon in about-translations.html</a></li>
<li>🌟 Freya Arbjerg [:freyacodes]: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036767">Blackboxed columns are ignored</a></li>
<li> tom.passarelli: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031328">tab-preview-panel emits unpaired popupshown/popuphidden events, breaking sidebar autohide</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Project Updates</h3>
<h4>Add-ons / Web Extensions</h4>
<h5>Addon Manager &amp; about:addons</h5>
<ul>
<li>As part of the work for the Project Nova about:addons page restyling, the about:addons sidebar has been migrated to the moz-page-nav and moz-page-nav-button reusable components, improving accessibility and visual consistency with the Firefox Desktop about:settings page –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1881767"> Bug 1881767</a></li>
</ul>
<h5>WebExtensions Framework</h5>
<ul>
<li>Implemented WebExtensions negative permissions infrastructure, providing the foundations for enterprise policy “blocked host permissions” features –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1745823"> Bug 1745823</a></li>
<li>Restricted host permission changes for MV3 extensions force-installed via enterprise policy (matching similar behaviors provided by Chrome enterprise policy behaviors) –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1904054"> Bug 1904054</a>
<ul>
<li>Thanks to Mike Kaply for the implementation of this enterprise policy enforcement feature.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h5>WebExtension APIs</h5>
<ul>
<li>Fixed handling of &lt;all_urls&gt; as an API permission in Manifest V3, ensuring the permission is correctly initialized on extension install –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1758306"> Bug 1758306</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>DevTools</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=789324">Rahman Mahmutović [:r_m]</a> made it possible to edit width/height in the box model section of the Layout panel (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1717176">#1717176</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=446518">Sebastian Zartner [:sebo]</a> improved toggling tools driving in-page highlighters (e.g. the Measuring) (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1262773">#1262773</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=446518">Sebastian Zartner [:sebo]</a> added a setting to control visibility of HTML comments in the markup view (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1455294">#1455294</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=789044">Freya Arbjerg [:freyacodes]</a> fixed an issue in script blackboxing (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036767">#2036767</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=283262">Alexandre Poirot [:ochameau]</a> replaced custom preference to log RDP messages with MOZ_LOG (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1622857">#1622857</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=283262">Alexandre Poirot [:ochameau]</a> fixed retrieval of garbage collected script text content (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1758454">#1758454</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h4>WebDriver</h4>
<ul>
<li>Sameem updated the “Take Element Screenshot” command from WebDriver Classic to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2013176">crop screenshots of elements which exceed the viewport</a>. This aligns with the specification and avoids errors when attempting to capture huge elements.</li>
<li>Alexandra Borovova updated the events for new top-level browsing contexts: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1930594">we will not send anymore “browsingContext.domContentLoaded” and “browsingContext.load” events for them, instead the “browsingContext.contextCreated” event will be sent when a tab is ready to be used</a>. This is required to align with the expected per-spec behavior.</li>
<li>Henrik Skupin landed a patch <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1430064">allowing geckodriver to gracefully shut down Firefox</a> when geckodriver itself is terminated.</li>
<li>Hiroyuki Ikezoe <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2040252">disabled Firefox’s “scroll axis lock” feature</a> so WebDriver actions for wheel input devices can scroll in arbitrary directions when using pan gestures.</li>
</ul>
<h4>Lint, Docs and Workflow</h4>
<ul>
<li>Added a rule to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1790711">prevent new uses of Preferences.sys.mjs</a>.</li>
<li>The browser environment globals within ESLint have <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1793814">now been updated</a>. These include Sanitizer, VideoFrame and a few other new ones.</li>
<li>Temporal, and some other definitions have been <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1999036">added to TypeScript</a>.</li>
</ul>
<h4>New Tab Page</h4>
<ul>
<li>Much has happened in the last 2 weeks! <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED%2CVERIFIED%2CCLOSED&amp;resolution=FIXED&amp;chfieldfrom=2026-05-12T14%3A40%3A16.019Z&amp;chfieldto=Now&amp;bug_id=2015530%2C2024720%2C2028377%2C2028534%2C2033592%2C2035176%2C2036902%2C2037143%2C2037301%2C2037541%2C2037646%2C2037947%2C2038048%2C2038392%2C2038790%2C2038823%2C2038881%2C2038981%2C2038984%2C2039103%2C2039107%2C2039333%2C2039346%2C2039358%2C2039477%2C2039587%2C2039752%2C2039765%2C2039770%2C2039775%2C2039956%2C2039963%2C2040027%2C2040033%2C2040254%2C2040269%2C2040370%2C2040376%2C2040480%2C2040481%2C2040503%2C2040552%2C2040645%2C2040674%2C2040677%2C2041033%2C2041163%2C2041196%2C2041204%2C2041205%2C2041207%2C2041244%2C2041532%2C2041651%2C2041682%2C2041708%2C2041711%2C2041730%2C2041757%2C2041765%2C2041814%2C2042054&amp;product=Firefox&amp;component=New+Tab+Page">Here’s a full bug list</a>, and here are some highlights.</li>
<li>Dre fixed the List widget that was creating a new list too eagerly on the New Tab Page (<a href="https://bugzil.la/2033592">2033592</a>) — prevents accidental list creation and improves the Lists UI reliability.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2035176"> fixed Weather widget small card layout issues with opt-in location options and an error message displayed</a>, resolving card overflow and removing the spurious opt-in error so users see a compact Weather card and correct location prompts on New Tab.</li>
<li>Reem Hamoui<a href="https://bugzil.la/2037301"> added key dates state to the Sports widget</a>, enabling the Sports card to surface event deadlines/key-date highlights on New Tab so sports users see timely date info.</li>
<li>Scott Downe<a href="https://bugzil.la/2037541"> added a manage widgets option to the New Tab nova widgets context menu</a>, giving users a direct context-menu entry to open the widget management flow from any widget with Nova enabled.</li>
<li>Scott Downe added a reusable Newtab widget base component to centralize lifecycle, focus/keyboard handling, DOM templates, and telemetry hooks, reducing duplication and making widget behavior more consistent; see<a href="https://bugzil.la/2037947"> Newtab widget base component</a>.</li>
<li>Dre converted per-widget expansion handling to a shared widget expansion handler to unify expand/collapse state management and prevent widgets from incorrectly retaining or losing expanded state; see<a href="https://bugzil.la/2038048"> Convert widget expansion handling to shared widget expansion</a>.</li>
<li>Nina Pypchenko [:nina-py]<a href="https://bugzil.la/2038881"> updated the Sports widget to populate the “follow teams” state from the /teams endpoint</a>, so follow/unfollow toggles now reflect server-side subscriptions and reduce incorrect follow states.</li>
<li>Scott Downe<a href="https://bugzil.la/2038981"> moved widget menu items</a> within New Tab widgets to standardize menu ordering and action grouping, so users find Add/Remove/Configure entries in expected positions across platforms.</li>
<li>Dre<a href="https://bugzil.la/2039346"> fixed a World Clock city search bug </a>for the word clocks widget, restoring expected search filtering/matching so city lookups return correct results.</li>
<li>Scott Downe fixed an issue where the New Tab small weather widget size change didn’t always apply by correcting the widget size update path (JS/CSS layout interactions), improving consistent rendering for small-tile weather across responsive breakpoints and platforms; see<a href="https://bugzil.la/2040033"> Newtab small weather widget size change doesn’t always work</a>.</li>
<li>Nina Pypchenko [:nina-py]<a href="https://bugzil.la/2040269"> added a group stage section to match highlights</a> in the sports widget on New Tab so users now see stage-aware grouping and stage labels on match highlight cards, making tournament context (group vs knockout) visible while browsing highlights.</li>
<li>Dre<a href="https://bugzil.la/2040376"> fixed the small world clock widget not expanding to large while editing clocks</a> so users can enter edit mode and expand the widget as expected; the change wires the edit-mode resize handler to update widget size/class during edits.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2040480"> added WCW OMC message strings</a> so World Cup widget messaging flows on New Tab now display the correct copy (localized where available) instead of falling back to missing-text behavior.</li>
<li>Reem Hamoui<a href="https://bugzil.la/2040552"> added a “View all” button and a list view for the results tab at medium widget size</a> so Sports widget users on medium New Tab tiles can expand results and scroll full lists without resizing the widget.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford<a href="https://bugzil.la/2040674"> added WCW “Watch Live” stream strings to the Sports widget strings bundle</a> so the widget can surface a localized “Watch Live” CTA for applicable events.</li>
<li>Dre<a href="https://bugzil.la/2040677"> restored VoiceOver reachability for Edit/Remove in World Clock on macOS</a> so macOS VoiceOver users can now focus and activate clock Edit/Remove controls thanks to accessibility role/label and focus-order fixes.</li>
<li>Maxx Crawford removed the persistent browser logo when all new-tab features (Top Sites, widgets, content feed) are disabled by adding a conditional render guard in the New Tab component, preventing an orphaned logo (<a href="https://bugzil.la/2041033">2041033</a>).</li>
<li>Mike Conley added New Tab jest tests to the node tests Tier 1 CI job<a href="https://bugzil.la/2041757"> Run newtab jest tests as part of node tests Tier 1 job</a> to catch regressions earlier in CI</li>
<li>Irene Ni shipped multiple visual fixes for the Sports widget<a href="https://bugzil.la/2041765"> Sports widget – various visual fixes</a> (spacing, truncation, icon alignment, clipping) to improve readability and layout on constrained viewports.</li>
</ul>
<h4>Picture-in-Picture</h4>
<ul>
<li>kpatenio <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2041113">adjusted our YouTube site specific wrapper so that the URL bar toggle appears more reliably</a>, especially when selecting videos from the YouTube search page.</li>
<li>Thanks to Sylvestre for patching <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2037420">some</a> <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2042141">bugs</a> to prevent some spurious console errors!</li>
<li>Niklas <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2013735">fixed captions on autopip videos failing to sync with the origin videos</a>.</li>
</ul>
<h4>Performance Tools (aka <a href="https://profiler.firefox.com/">Firefox Profiler</a>)</h4>
<ul>
<li>Firefox Profiler now has a CLI! We also added a profiler-analysis skill to the Firefox codebase. Once you capture a performance profile, you can ask Claude or an AI to analyze it by providing a link or local path. You can use it to analyze a performance regression or debug an issue if you have a profile at hand.
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/@firefox-devtools/profiler-cli">https://www.npmjs.com/package/@firefox-devtools/profiler-cli</a></li>
<li>You can install it with npm install -g @firefox-devtools/profiler-cli@latest</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h4>Search and Urlbar</h4>
<h6>Nova UI refresh</h6>
<ul>
<li>Drew and Daisuke continued working on reorganizing styles and updating the urlbar for Nova.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2019154">2019154</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2019152">2019152</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2041501">2041501</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2040532">2040532</a></li>
</ul>
<h6>Suggest</h6>
<ul>
<li>Drew landed several Suggest improvements: realtime suggestions colors, sports suggestions received World Cup tweaks, and online Suggest via OHTTP was enabled for eligible users in Firefox 153.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2040561">2040561</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2039753">2039753</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035614">2035614</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038843">2038843</a></li>
</ul>
<h6>Adaptive autofill</h6>
<ul>
<li>James fixed soft-block counting to track autofill dismisses, rather than consecutive backspaces on the same autofill, and added telemetry to measure URLs reintegration after blocking.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2040819">2040819</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2037177">2037177</a></li>
</ul>
<h6>Quick actions</h6>
<ul>
<li>Dharma created a new Firefox Labs quick action, fixed the Update action button, and re-enabled ScotchBonnet in some tests that were not updated yet.</li>
<li>Caleb added Calculator support for certain unicode operators.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023169">2023169</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1928635">1928635</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1923383">1923383</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033861">2033861</a></li>
</ul>
<h6>Multi Context Address Bar</h6>
<ul>
<li>Moritz continued refactoring the urlbar code: converted some of the js modules to not be system modules, fixed dynamic results templates, incorrect reuse of result rows, and keyboard shortcuts on the unified search button panel.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2039297">2039297</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036095">2036095</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2039844">2039844</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2037933">2037933</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030050">2030050</a></li>
</ul>
<h6><i>Other</i></h6>
<ul>
<li>Marco, Drew and Daisuke fixed several intermittent test failures.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038510">2038510</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2023908">2023908</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2011584">2011584</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1938142">1938142</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1971091">1971091</a></li>
</ul>
<h5>Search</h5>
<ul>
<li>Mark removed old WebExtension-based search engines from the source tree, removed loading of search add-ons from <i>resource://search-extensions/</i>.</li>
<li>Caleb fixed multiple documentation issues and added a test covering searches from a private window.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1904613">1904613</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035878">2035878</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2037942">2037942</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033545">2033545</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2005724">2005724</a></li>
</ul>
<h5>Places</h5>
<ul>
<li>Marco removed some unnecessary database transactions, fixed the bookmarks panel folder dropdown on Windows, and resolved several intermittent test failures.</li>
<li>Thanks to Sam Johnson who fixed the bookmark edit panel showing “mobile” instead of “Mobile Bookmarks”.</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2039534">2039534</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1505800">1505800</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2008829">2008829</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2029541">2029541</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2035084">2035084</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Firefox Nightly: Eyedropper Quick Action, geckodriver 0.37, and Tighter File Permissions – These Weeks in Firefox: Issue 205]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Highlights

Dao added a new Eyedropper quick action! Check it out by typing “color” or “eyedropper” in the URL bar (Bug 1803575) on Nightly.



Henrik Skupin released geckodriver 0.37.0, which includes support for several new APIs and various bug fixes. See the release page for details.
Starting ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693292/tools/firefox-nightly-eyedropper-quick-action-geckodriver-037-and-tighter-file-permissions-these-weeks-in-firefox-issue-205/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693292/tools/firefox-nightly-eyedropper-quick-action-geckodriver-037-and-tighter-file-permissions-these-weeks-in-firefox-issue-205/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Highlights</h3>
<ul>
<li>Dao added a new Eyedropper quick action! Check it out by typing “color” or “eyedropper” in the URL bar (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1803575">Bug 1803575</a>) on Nightly.</li>
</ul>
<p><img alt='Firefox URL bar dropdown with "col" typed in, showing an eyedropper button labeled "Pick a color" below search suggestions.' class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2084" height="358" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image1-3.png" width="724"></p>
<ul>
<li>Henrik Skupin <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1938333">released geckodriver 0.37.0</a>, which includes support for several new APIs and various bug fixes. See the <a href="https://github.com/mozilla/geckodriver/releases/tag/v0.37.0">release page for details</a>.</li>
<li>Starting from Firefox 153, access to local file: URLs is being restricted by default.
<ul>
<li>Extensions now require an explicit “Access local files on your computer” permission, separate from broad host permissions, that users must grant.</li>
<li>Extensions can call the extension.isAllowedFileSchemeAccess() API to determine whether they have been granted access to file: URLs (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2034168">Bug 2034168</a>).</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Friends of the Firefox team</h3>
<h4><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?title=Resolved%20bugs%20(excluding%20employees)&amp;quicksearch=1941404%2C2039281%2C2024187%2C1674047%2C1986161%2C2043187%2C2019260%2C2027580%2C2027582%2C2041640%2C2039294%2C2042309%2C1830551%2C2031735%2C2043952%2C1972065%2C2043958%2C2042419%2C2042820%2C2022661%2C1994826%2C2041802%2C1315558%2C1930776%2C2042921%2C2043938">Resolved bugs (excluding employees)</a></h4>
<p><a href="https://github.com/niklasbaumgardner/NewContributorScraper">Script to find new contributors from bug list</a></p>
<h4>Volunteers that fixed more than one bug</h4>
<ul>
<li>:Vincent</li>
<li>Chris Vander Linden</li>
<li>DrSeed</li>
<li>Khalid AlHaddad</li>
<li>Sam Johnson</li>
</ul>
<h4>New contributors (🌟 = first patch)</h4>
<ul>
<li>Francis :mckenfra: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1315558">tld service for webextensions</a></li>
<li>any1here: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2042309">about:preferences#privacy is broken with MOZ_DATA_REPORTING false</a></li>
<li>pullmana8: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031735">Fix protocol/Actor.js to throw an Error instead of an Actor</a></li>
<li>RAN1: <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1830551">Firefox Crashes on Quit When Running Two Browsers With Separate Profiles</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Project Updates</h3>
<h4>Accessibility</h4>
<ul>
<li>Morgan added a new accessibility-specific, front-end review skill to mozilla central! 🎉 You can read about it, and learn how to use it <a href="https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/bug-mgmt/processes/accessibility-review.html#automated-accessibility-review-skill">in the accessibility review source docs</a>.</li>
</ul>
<h4>Add-ons / Web Extensions</h4>
<h5>Addon Manager &amp; about:addons</h5>
<ul>
<li>Migrated addon-page-header and addon-card action buttons to the reusable moz-button web component as part of the ongoing Nova restyling of about:addons –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2042200"> Bug 2042200</a> /<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2042204"> Bug 2042204</a></li>
<li>Extended moz-page-nav-button with a forwarded title property to fix an accessibility issue where the component lacked a label in collapsed state; Landed in Firefox 153, and uplifted to Firefox 152 for about:settings which was already riding the 152 release train –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2040971"> Bug 2040971</a></li>
<li>Fixed a shutdown-timing bug where a pending GMP update-check timer could fire after XPCOMShutdownThreads started, causing a pref write assertion; Fixed in Firefox 153 –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2043803"> Bug 2043803</a></li>
</ul>
<h5>WebExtensions Framework</h5>
<ul>
<li>Fixed MV2 content scripts incorrectly injecting into guarded hosts because MozDocumentMatcher::MatchesURI was not consulting CheckGuarded when mCheckPermissions was false; Fixed in Firefox 153 –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2041393"> Bug 2041393</a></li>
<li>Added support for accessing ObservableArray attributes (such as adoptedStyleSheets) from XrayWrappers and extension content scripts, unblocking extensions that rely on this Web API; Fixed in Firefox 153 –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1751346"> Bug 1751346</a></li>
<li>Wired runtime_blocked_hosts and runtime_allowed_hosts enterprise policy settings through ExtensionSettings to allow administrators to restrict extension host permissions on managed devices, starting in Firefox 153 –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1805205"> Bug 1805205</a>
<ul>
<li>Thanks to Mike Kaply for implementing this enterprise policy enhancement.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h5>WebExtension APIs</h5>
<ul>
<li>Fixed promiseTabWhenReady blocking indefinitely on discarded tabs, preventing cleanup of associated resources and potentially causing memory leaks; Fixed in Firefox 153 –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1653876"> Bug 1653876</a></li>
<li>Fixed webNavigation.onCommitted being dispatched twice for cross-origin iframes loaded under Fission, caused by a redundant OnStateChange trigger firing in addition to OnLocationChange; Fixed in Firefox 153 –<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1750196"> Bug 1750196</a></li>
</ul>
<h4>DevTools</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=766005">Chris Vander Linden</a> made the Search input component shared as we plan to use it in the Netmonitor as well (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2019260">#2019260</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027580">#2027580</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027582">#2027582</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=631103">pullmana8</a> improved error management in the DevTools protocol (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2031735">#2031735</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=553004">Chris H-C :chutten</a> removed Legacy Telemetry devtools instrumentation (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2039650">#2039650</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=13647">:glob ✱</a> fixed an issue in the Inspector where the swatch color for variable in @starting-style rule could have the wrong color (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2016778">#2016778</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=557153">Nicolas Chevobbe [:nchevobbe]</a> exposed heading level more clearly in the accessibility tree (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1588784">#1588784</a>) and in the accessibility highlighter (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2044904">#2044904</a>)</li>
</ul>
<p><img alt='Accessibility panel in Firefox DevTools showing a selected "heading (level 3)" node named "Backwards compatibility."' class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2083" height="375" src="https://blog.nightly.mozilla.org/files/2026/06/image2-3.png" width="727"></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=559949">Julian Descottes [:jdescottes]</a> migrated the markup view to HTML (from XHTML) to fix an issue when editing the markup (CodeMirror 6 does not support XHTML) (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2028058">#2028058</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=557153">Nicolas Chevobbe [:nchevobbe]</a> fixed an issue in Netmonitor search where it could appear the the search stalled (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2042405">#2042405</a>)</li>
<li><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/user_profile?user_id=656417">Hubert Boma Manilla (:bomsy)</a> added more connection information (ECH, Delegated Credentials, OCSP, Private DNS, …) in Netmonitor Security tab (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036404">#2036404</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h4>WebDriver</h4>
<ul>
<li>Khalid AlHaddad improved the window manipulation commands in Marionette and WebDriver BiDi to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1941404">allow individual window geometry properties, such as x, y, width, and height, to be adjusted independently</a>.</li>
<li>Khalid AlHaddad updated our codebase to <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1972065">use constants instead of hardcoded strings</a> for all our session data types.</li>
<li>Alexandra Borovova updated <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2015655">the “emulation.setLocaleOverride” command to also apply a locale emulation in dedicated and shared workers</a>.</li>
<li>Alexandra Borovova fixed <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2042385">a regression when there would be no “script.realmCreated” events after the cross-origin navigation</a>.</li>
</ul>
<h4>Search and Urlbar</h4>
<ul>
<li>Dharma updated context search actions to trigger search instead of entering search mode @ <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1945080">1945080</a></li>
<li>Daisuke and Drew worked on a lot of Nova updates, including ensuring Nova is tested @ <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2041255">2041255</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2030183">2030183</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2019168">2019168</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2044849">2044849</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2033583">2033583</a></li>
<li>Moritz has worked on several refactorings to allow the urlbar to be used in content @ <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2039828">2039828</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2039298">2039298</a>, <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2041280">2041280</a></li>
<li>Middle click paste replaces content was fixed by Moritz @ <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2042893">2042893</a></li>
<li>Michel added feature to show registrable domain on desktop after its implementation on mobile @ <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1986161">1986161</a></li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Rust Programming Language Blog: crates.io: development update]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Another six months have passed since our last development update, and the crates.io team has been busy. Here's a summary of the most notable changes and improvements made to crates.io since then.

Source Code Viewer
Crate pages now have a "Code" tab that lets you browse the contents of published ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693285/tools/the-rust-programming-language-blog-cratesio-development-update/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693285/tools/the-rust-programming-language-blog-cratesio-development-update/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another six months have passed since our <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/01/21/crates-io-development-update/" rel="external">last development update</a>, and the crates.io team has been busy. Here's a summary of the most notable changes and improvements made to <a href="https://crates.io/" rel="external">crates.io</a> since then.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#source-code-viewer"></a>
Source Code Viewer</h3>
<p>Crate pages now have a "Code" tab that lets you browse the contents of published crate versions directly on crates.io. This shows you the exact files that <code>cargo</code> downloads when you add a crate as a dependency, which might differ from the linked repository. This makes it much easier to audit your dependencies, including files that never appear in the repository, like the normalized <code>Cargo.toml</code> files that <code>cargo</code> generates.</p>
<p><img alt='Source code viewer showing the "Code" tab of the serde crate' src="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/code-tab.png"></p>
<p>The viewer comes with a file tree sidebar with search functionality, syntax highlighting, and GitHub-style line selection, where clicking or dragging line numbers produces shareable <code>#L10-L20</code> URLs.</p>
<p>Under the hood, the server now builds a zip file for every published version. Since the <code>.crate</code> files that <code>cargo</code> consumes are gzipped tarballs without random access support, a background job re-packs each of them into a seekable zip archive plus a JSON manifest describing the contained files. Both are served from our static CDN. The frontend then fetches only the manifest and loads each file on demand with an HTTP range request. Because of this architecture, browsing crate sources essentially adds no load on the crates.io API servers. Existing crate versions have been backfilled, so this works for old releases too.</p>
<p>The rendering library behind the code viewer is a diff renderer at heart, and that's no accident: a version-to-version diff viewer built on the same infrastructure is currently in the works. This will allow you to review exactly what changed between two published versions, right on crates.io. Stay tuned!</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#untangling-crates-io-accounts-from-github"></a>
Untangling crates.io Accounts from GitHub</h3>
<p>At the end of May, the crates.io team accepted <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3946" rel="external">RFC #3946</a>. Crates.io accounts always have been tightly coupled to GitHub: signing in means "Log in with GitHub", and your crates.io identity is your GitHub username. The RFC changes that. It introduces usernames that are native to crates.io and independent of linked GitHub accounts, as a prerequisite for eventually supporting login via other identity providers.</p>
<p>The implementation of crates.io usernames has started, but there is still a lot left to do, most visibly the ability to change your crates.io username. After that is complete, there will be future RFCs and implementation for signing in with identity providers other than GitHub. Since all of this touches authentication and account security, we are deliberately taking it slow and rolling these changes out in small, carefully reviewed steps.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#advisories-and-suggestions"></a>
Advisories and Suggestions</h3>
<p>In our <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/01/21/crates-io-development-update/" rel="external">January update</a> we introduced the "Security" tab, which shows security advisories from the <a href="https://rustsec.org/" rel="external">RustSec</a> database. We have since taken this integration one step further: crates that RustSec has flagged as unmaintained now show a warning banner directly on their crate pages, linking to the corresponding advisory for details and possible alternatives. Thanks to <a href="https://github.com/djc" rel="external">Dirkjan Ochtman</a> for implementing this feature!</p>
<p><img alt="Unmaintained warning banner on the ansi_term crate page" src="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/unmaintained-banner.png"></p>
<p>Related to this, some popular crates have been largely absorbed into the Rust standard library over the years, like <code>lazy_static</code>, which has been superseded by <code>std::sync::LazyLock</code> since Rust 1.80. Crate pages of such crates now show a friendly "You might not need this dependency" banner describing the standard library replacement, and superseded crates in dependency lists get a small light bulb icon with a similar hint.</p>
<p><img alt='"You might not need this dependency" banner on the lazy_static crate page' src="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/std-replacement-banner.png"></p>
<p>The dataset behind this feature lives in the new <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/std-replacement-data" rel="external">rust-lang/std-replacement-data</a> repository, together with a documented inclusion policy: standard library replacements only, every entry must cite the stable <code>std</code>, <code>core</code>, or <code>alloc</code> API and Rust version, and crate maintainers get a notice-and-comment window before an entry is added. New entries can be proposed upstream and can benefit other tools too.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#ferris"></a>
Ferris</h3>
<p>The most delightful change of this cycle: the Ferris on our error pages now follows your mouse cursor with its eyes:</p>
<p><img alt="Ferris' eyes following the mouse cursor on the error page" src="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/ferris.gif"></p>
<p>Getting a 404 error on crates.io is now slightly less sad.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#svelte-frontend-migration-completed"></a>
Svelte Frontend Migration Completed</h3>
<p>In our <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/01/21/crates-io-development-update/" rel="external">January update</a>, we announced that we were experimenting with porting the crates.io frontend from Ember.js to <a href="https://svelte.dev/" rel="external">Svelte</a>. This experiment has concluded successfully: the new frontend reached feature parity, went through a <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2026/04/17/crates-io-svelte-public-testing/" rel="external">public testing phase</a> in April, became the default at the beginning of May, and the Ember.js app has been removed from our repository.</p>
<p>We designed this change to be invisible for our users, since the new frontend is a 1:1 port of the previous design and functionality. For the team and our contributors, however, it is a big deal: the frontend is now built on a more modern framework, which should make it easier for new contributors to get started. It also allows us to iterate faster, as the source code viewer above demonstrates.</p>
<p>We want to thank the <a href="https://emberjs.com/teams/" rel="external">Ember.js team</a> for a framework that served crates.io well for many years, and the Svelte team for making the transition so enjoyable.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#miscellaneous"></a>
Miscellaneous</h3>
<p>These were some of the more visible changes to crates.io over the past six months, but a lot has happened "under the hood" as well:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p><strong>Search performance</strong>: Relevance-sorted search queries previously ranked every crate matching the query, which could take 1-2 seconds for short or common search terms. Ranking is now bounded to the 1,000 matching crates with the highest recent download counts.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Reverse dependencies performance</strong>: The reverse dependencies endpoint no longer recomputes the full dependent set on every request. It is now served from a precomputed table kept in sync by database triggers, turning an expensive join into a bounded index scan and greatly reducing the chance of getting a timeout error.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>New ARCHITECTURE.md</strong>: If you've ever wondered how crates.io actually works, our <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io/blob/main/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md" rel="external"><code>ARCHITECTURE.md</code></a> document got a complete rewrite. It is now organized around the high-level systems that make up crates.io and how they fit together, and includes walkthroughs of what happens when you run <code>cargo publish</code>, why a typical crate download never touches our API servers, and how download counts are derived from CDN access logs.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Definition lists</strong>: READMEs now render Markdown <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io/pull/13950" rel="external">definition lists</a>, a widely used Markdown extension. Our markdown renderer <a href="https://crates.io/crates/comrak" rel="external">comrak</a> already supported them, the extension just wasn't enabled yet. Thanks to <a href="https://github.com/mistaste" rel="external">@mistaste</a> for this contribution!</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>CDN cache tags</strong>: Files uploaded to our static CDN now carry cache-tag metadata, allowing us to invalidate all cached files of a crate or a specific release in a single operation, instead of issuing one invalidation per file URL.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Caching improvements</strong>: We removed a global <code>Vary: Cookie</code> response header that was preventing our CDNs from caching public API responses and frontend assets effectively. Per-user responses now use <code>Cache-Control: no-store</code> instead, resulting in better cache hit rates at the CDN edge.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Accessibility</strong>: We have made crates.io friendlier to screen readers: decorative icons are now hidden from the accessibility tree, heading hierarchies have been fixed, and lists are marked up as proper lists. ARIA snapshot tests now ensure that regressions can't slip in unnoticed. We plan to continue to improve crates.io accessibility over the coming months.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Git index performance</strong>: The background worker's local clone of the git index is now a bare and shallow repository, eliminating roughly 250,000 checked-out files and the full commit history from its disk, improving its performance as we see increased rates of crate publication. The periodic index squashing now goes through the GitHub API instead of generating large git packs locally, which had previously caused out-of-memory failures on the production worker.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#feedback"></a>
Feedback</h3>
<p>We hope you enjoyed this update on the development of crates.io. If you have any feedback or questions, please let us know on <a href="https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/318791-t-crates-io" rel="external">Zulip</a> or <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io/discussions" rel="external">GitHub</a>. We are always happy to hear from you and are looking forward to your feedback!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[SHOCKING NEW OpenAI Robotics Tech + Tesla Reveals Optimus AI Robot Update | Meta AI CACTI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: AI News - Bewertung: 343x - Views:10943 - In a world-changing breakthrough, Microsoft researchers have integrated OpenAI’s ChatGPT with robotics and other devices, enabling the use of natural language to control various devices, including drones, robot arms, home assistant robots and more...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693270/videos/shocking-new-openai-robotics-tech-tesla-reveals-optimus-ai-robot-update-meta-ai-cacti/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693270/videos/shocking-new-openai-robotics-tech-tesla-reveals-optimus-ai-robot-update-meta-ai-cacti/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:36:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: AI News - Bewertung: 343x - Views:10943 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/tKUHRkqt6tE?autoplay=1&origin=https://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>- In a world-changing breakthrough, Microsoft researchers have integrated OpenAI’s ChatGPT with robotics and other devices, enabling the use of natural language to control various devices, including drones, robot arms, home assistant robots and more, allowing humans to easily communicate their intentions to robots just like they would to another human, bridging the gap between man and machine. Tesla’s Optimus AI robot can now walk short distances by itself, carry an object of its arm&#039;s size, and use basic tools with the help of artificial intelligence. CACTI from Meta AI consists of four stages that handle data collection, data augmentation, visual representation learning, and imitation policy training separately to enable scalability in robot learning. <br />
<br />
AI Marketplace: https://taimine.com/<br />
Deep Learning AI Specialization: https://imp.i384100.net/GET-STARTED<br />
<br />
AI News Timestamps:<br />
0:00 New OpenAI Robotics Tech With ChatGPT<br />
5:06 Tesla Optimus AI Robot News<br />
6:15 Meta AI CACTI Robot Imitation Learning<br />
<br />
#technology #tech #ai<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why Gaming on Linux Suddenly Matters]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Techquickie - Bewertung: 24191x - Views:665011 Click this link https://boot.dev/?promo=TECHQUICKIE and use my code TECHQUICKIE to get 25% off your first payment for boot.dev. Thank you Boot.Dev for Sponsoring! 

From broken drivers to the Steam Deck selling millions, Linux gaming has gone...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693264/videos/why-gaming-on-linux-suddenly-matters/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693264/videos/why-gaming-on-linux-suddenly-matters/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:36:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Techquickie - Bewertung: 24191x - Views:665011 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3lJ5oT_JviI?autoplay=1&origin=https://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Click this link https://boot.dev/?promo=TECHQUICKIE and use my code TECHQUICKIE to get 25% off your first payment for boot.dev. Thank you Boot.Dev for Sponsoring! <br />
<br />
From broken drivers to the Steam Deck selling millions, Linux gaming has gone from &quot;is this the year?&quot; to &quot;wait, it actually works now.&quot; But getting here took a decade of tinkering, a billion-dollar bet from Valve, and an open-source community that refused to quit. In this video we talk to Valve and the Batocera project about how Linux quietly became a real threat to Windows - and why Microsoft is playing catch-up.<br />
<br />
Leave a reply with your requests for future episodes.<br />
<br />
► SHOP OUR PRODUCTS: https://lttstore.com<br />
► GET A VPN: https://www.piavpn.com/TechQuickie<br />
► GET EXCLUSIVE CONTENT ON FLOATPLANE: https://lmg.gg/lttfloatplane<br />
► SPONSORS, AFFILIATES, AND PARTNERS: https://lmg.gg/partners<br />
<br />
Purchases made through some store links may provide some compensation to Linus Media Group. Affiliate links powered in part by https://affilimate.com/<br />
<br />
Linus Sebastian is an investor in Framework Computer, Inc and HexOS by Eshtek.<br />
<br />
Chapters<br />
------------------------------------<br />
0:01 Is this the year of Linux gaming?<br />
0:43 Why Microsoft is usually better<br />
2:03 How Valve is fighting back<br />
3:37 Sponsor <br />
4:14 Steamdeck saved the day<br />
4:50 Windows claps back <br />
6:27 Valve is putting up a fight <br />
7:40 Watch another video<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[3 cybersecurity issues that should keep every CEO awake at night]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For years, I have been saying that cybersecurity is no longer a technology problem. It has become a business leadership challenge.



Yet, despite record levels of spending, ever-growing security teams, increasingly sophisticated technologies and a constant stream of new regulations, organization...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693088/it-nachrichten/3-cybersecurity-issues-that-should-keep-every-ceo-awake-at-night/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693088/it-nachrichten/3-cybersecurity-issues-that-should-keep-every-ceo-awake-at-night/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:16:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For years, I have been saying that cybersecurity is no longer a technology problem. It has become a business leadership challenge.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Yet, despite record levels of spending, ever-growing security teams, increasingly sophisticated technologies and a constant stream of new regulations, organizations continue to suffer major cyber incidents with alarming regularity. Every week seems to bring news of another ransomware attack, supply chain compromise or data breach affecting organizations that many would have assumed were well protected.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The obvious conclusion is that we are asking the wrong questions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Too many executive teams remain preoccupied with the latest threat actor, the newest security product the CISO wants to buy or the latest vulnerability making headlines. Those issues matter, but they are not what should be keeping CEOs awake at night.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In my view, there are three far more fundamental issues that deserve the attention of every chief executive.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">1. Corporate complexity, and the widening gap between business leadership and cybersecurity reality</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Perhaps the biggest cybersecurity risk facing large organizations today is not technical at all.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is the growing disconnect between executive perception and operational reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many boards genuinely believe their organizations are reasonably well protected. They receive regular dashboards showing improving maturity scores, increasing compliance levels, falling vulnerability counts and reassuring traffic-light reports.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unfortunately, cyber attackers do not read dashboards.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Behind those executive reports often lies an increasingly complex technology landscape, thousands of unmanaged digital assets, ageing infrastructure, rampant shadow IT, fragmented ownership, inconsistent governance and security teams struggling to keep pace with relentless business change.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The problem is rarely a lack of effort.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is that corporate complexity has reached a level where traditional governance mechanisms are no longer capable of providing an accurate picture of organizational resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Executives believe they understand the level of cyber risk they face because they receive regular reports. Those reports often measure activity rather than resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Governance committees end up debating around another percentage point of phishing awareness or vulnerability remediation, while fundamental issues remain unaddressed in the background.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">2. Organizational inertia, and the need for executive structure to evolve faster</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cyber criminals continue to evolve rapidly. Large organizations generally do not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the second issue that should concern every CEO.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Throughout my career, I have observed organizations repeatedly responding to new cyber threats by adding another technology platform, another monitoring capability, another compliance framework or another governance committee.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Very rarely do they stop to redesign how cybersecurity operates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The result is what I described several years ago as the “<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Cybersecurity-Spiral-Failure-How-Break/dp/1637353057/">Cybersecurity Spiral of Failure</a>”.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>As complexity and regulation increase, organizations invest in more security products.</li>



<li>More products create more complexity.</li>



<li>More products and greater complexity generate more alerts.</li>



<li>More alerts require more analysts.</li>



<li>More analysts produce more reports.</li>



<li>More reports continue to build up executive confidence.</li>



<li>Meanwhile, the underlying structural weaknesses remain largely unchanged, technical debt piles up and costs escalate.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And when the inevitable breach eventually happens, reality reveals itself, but distrust also sets in between senior executives and security teams.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is not a funding problem. Nor is it a skills problem. It is fundamentally an operating model problem.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many organizations continue trying to solve twenty-first century challenges using governance, accountability, organizational and reporting structures designed twenty-five years ago.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The cybersecurity function itself has evolved dramatically. Many executive structures have not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This organizational inertia extends beyond technology: It affects budgeting cycles, <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4193990/reallocating-cybersecurity-capital-in-the-mythos-era.html">investment priorities</a>, procurement processes, accountability models and decision-making speed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cyber attackers innovate every day. Organizational change often takes years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That imbalance should worry every CEO.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">3. Accelerating technological disruption, and how it challenges organizations in areas where they are intrinsically weak</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The third issue is potentially the most significant over the coming decade.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Artificial intelligence, autonomous agents and machine identities</li>



<li>Software supply chain complexity.</li>



<li>Quantum computing, and post-quantum cryptography</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each of these developments represents far more than another technical trend.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Together, they fundamentally change the dynamics of cybersecurity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Artificial intelligence is transforming countless business processes. At the same time, it is also increasing both the speed and sophistication of cyber-attacks while simultaneously transforming defensive capabilities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Organizations have become increasingly dependent on software ecosystems that extend far beyond their own direct control. Engaging with the supply chain in ways that lead to a genuine appreciation of the risks involved has become a key challenge for most cybersecurity practices.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Quantum computing may eventually invalidate much of today’s cryptographic algorithms, forcing organizations into one of the largest technology efforts since Y2K — but without the benefit of a fixed deadline and faced by a problem that is considerably more complex and hyperconnected IT estates that have little to do with those of the late 90s.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of these challenges can be solved overnight: They require clear governance, sustained investment over a few years and cross-functional organizational coordination.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most large organizations are weak on those three fronts: This is precisely why CEOs should be focusing on them now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Waiting until some of those risks become obvious will almost certainly be too late.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Businesses naturally prioritise immediate commercial pressures. Cybersecurity often involves preparing for risks whose timing remains uncertain.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But one of the greatest leadership failures I keep seeing remains the inability of organizations to act decisively on known unknowns.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That tension explains why many organizations delay action until external events force them to respond. Unfortunately, cybersecurity rarely rewards late action.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Leadership will determine who succeeds</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cybersecurity discussions still frequently focus on technology. I believe they should focus far more on leadership.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Technology will continue evolving. Threat actors will continue adapting. Regulations will continue expanding. Those developments are inevitable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What remains within the control of every CEO is how their organization responds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Does cybersecurity remain an IT issue? Or is it recognised as an integral part of business resilience?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">How is cybersecurity accountability assigned at executive level? Or does it still rest largely with a CISO hidden in the organization?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Does the board spend sufficient time discussing resilience? Or does cybersecurity appear only when approving budgets or reviewing incidents?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These questions will increasingly determine organizational success.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The companies that navigate the next decade successfully will not necessarily be those spending the most on cybersecurity. Nor will they be those deploying the latest security technologies first.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They will be the organizations whose leadership recognises that cybersecurity has become a permanent business capability — embedded into governance, strategy, operational decision-making and organizational culture.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That transformation cannot be delegated. It begins with the CEO.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And perhaps that is the single biggest issue that should keep every chief executive awake at night: Not when the next cyber-attack will happen, but whether their organization is evolving quickly enough on those matters to meet a threat landscape that is changing much faster than the business itself.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Framework Passes Rising Memory and Processor Costs to Buyers, With a Twist]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Preordered laptops might not get a price change, but they could have less RAM.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692744/it-nachrichten/framework-passes-rising-memory-and-processor-costs-to-buyers-with-a-twist/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692744/it-nachrichten/framework-passes-rising-memory-and-processor-costs-to-buyers-with-a-twist/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 01:32:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Preordered laptops might not get a price change, but they could have less RAM.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CISO’s guide to privileged identity management]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Organizations are leaning into zero trust, a framework that assumes no entity can access a specific asset until they have been verified, validated and authorized. This approach makes privileged identity management, or PIM, an increasingly important resource. PIM supplants…
Read more →
The post CI...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692519/it-security-nachrichten/cisos-guide-to-privileged-identity-management/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692519/it-security-nachrichten/cisos-guide-to-privileged-identity-management/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 23:13:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;p&gt;Organizations are leaning into zero trust, a framework that assumes no entity can access a specific asset until they have been verified, validated and authorized. This approach makes privileged identity management, or &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=”https://www.techtarget.com/searchsecurity/definition/privileged-identity-management-PIM”&gt;PIM&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, an increasingly important resource.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;PIM supplants…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/cisos-guide-to-privileged-identity-management/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/cisos-guide-to-privileged-identity-management/">CISO’s guide to privileged identity management</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Framework Desktop: Version mit Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 495 & 192 GB RAM angekündigt]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Framework hat sich als Hersteller dem Thema Modularität, Aufrüstbarkeit und Reparierbarkeit verschrieben. Anfang des vergangenen Jahres hat man mit dem Framework Desktop das Portfolio um einen...Zum Beitrag: Framework Desktop: Version mit Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 495 & 192 GB RAM angekündigt

Wo du uns ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692405/it-nachrichten/framework-desktop-version-mit-ryzen-ai-max-pro-495-192-gb-ram-angekuendigt/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692405/it-nachrichten/framework-desktop-version-mit-ryzen-ai-max-pro-495-192-gb-ram-angekuendigt/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 21:35:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Framework hat sich als Hersteller dem Thema Modularität, Aufrüstbarkeit und Reparierbarkeit verschrieben. Anfang des vergangenen Jahres hat man mit dem Framework Desktop das Portfolio um einen...<p>Zum Beitrag: <a href="https://stadt-bremerhaven.de/framework-desktop-version-mit-ryzen-ai-max-pro-495-192-gb-ram-angekuendigt/">Framework Desktop: Version mit Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 495 &amp; 192 GB RAM angekündigt</a>
</p><p>
Wo du uns folgen kannst:
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/CaschysBlog">Facebook</a>, <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/CaschysBlog/">Reddit</a>, <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMQgKIitDQklTR2dnTWFoWUtGSE4wWVdSMExXSnlaVzFsY21oaGRtVnVMbVJsS0FBUAE?ceid=DE:de&amp;oc=3">Google News</a>, <a href="https://x.com/CaschysBlog">X</a>, <a href="https://www.threads.com/@caschysblog">Threads</a>
<br>
</p><div>
    <strong>Auf dem Laufenden bleiben?</strong>
    <br>
    <a href="https://www.google.com/preferences/source?q=stadt-bremerhaven.de">Fügt uns doch bei Google als bevorzugte Quelle hinzu!</a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why Autonomous Systems Need Their Own Cybersecurity Framework]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Autonomous systems are moving from pilots and prototypes into mission-critical operations. Drones inspect infrastructure. Robots support industrial workflows. Uncrewed platforms are becoming part of defense, public safety, logistics, energy, and...
The post Why Autonomous Systems Need Their Own C...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692265/it-security-nachrichten/why-autonomous-systems-need-their-own-cybersecurity-framework/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692265/it-security-nachrichten/why-autonomous-systems-need-their-own-cybersecurity-framework/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 20:18:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="1024" height="768" src="https://www.cyberdefensemagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Why-Autonomous-Systems-Need-Their-Own-Cybersecurity-Framework.png.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://www.cyberdefensemagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Why-Autonomous-Systems-Need-Their-Own-Cybersecurity-Framework.png.jpg 1024w, https://www.cyberdefensemagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Why-Autonomous-Systems-Need-Their-Own-Cybersecurity-Framework.png-768x576.jpg 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><p>Autonomous systems are moving from pilots and prototypes into mission-critical operations. Drones inspect infrastructure. Robots support industrial workflows. Uncrewed platforms are becoming part of defense, public safety, logistics, energy, and...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.cyberdefensemagazine.com/why-autonomous-systems-need-their-own-cybersecurity-framework/" data-wpel-link="internal">Why Autonomous Systems Need Their Own Cybersecurity Framework</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.cyberdefensemagazine.com/" data-wpel-link="internal">Cyber Defense Magazine</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Cloudflare Internal DNS puts public and private DNS on one policy engine]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Enterprises typically operate separate systems for internal and external DNS because the two serve different audiences. Public DNS resolves names for services meant to be reached from the internet. Private DNS resolves internal resources, such as databases and internal applications, that should n...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692009/it-security-nachrichten/cloudflare-internal-dns-puts-public-and-private-dns-on-one-policy-engine/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692009/it-security-nachrichten/cloudflare-internal-dns-puts-public-and-private-dns-on-one-policy-engine/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 18:18:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises typically operate separate systems for internal and external <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/965540/what-is-dns-and-how-does-it-work.html">DNS</a> because the two serve different audiences. Public DNS resolves names for services meant to be reached from the internet. Private DNS resolves internal resources, such as databases and internal applications, that should never be visible outside the corporate network. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While public DNS is usually a single system, private DNS is often scattered across on-premises appliances, cloud-native resolvers, and split-horizon setups, where the same hostname resolves to a different answer depending on whether the query comes from inside or outside the network. Coordinating those deployments across headquarters, branch offices, and multiple clouds means <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4158134/dns-security-is-often-inadequate-and-network-engineers-should-get-more-involved.html">ongoing manual synchronization work</a> for network teams. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Private DNS itself is not a new concept. It is already available from hyperscalers and established enterprise DNS vendors, but it typically runs apart from public DNS, with its own console, control plane and policy engine.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cloudflare’s answer is a product it calls Internal DNS.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Many organizations already use Cloudflare for their public DNS,” <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/enriquesomoza/">Enrique Somoza</a>, product, performance and infrastructure at Cloudflare, told<em> Network World</em>. “Internal DNS extends that same platform to private DNS, so public and private are managed from the same global network and control plane.” </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How it works</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Query handling starts at the resolver, not at the zone. That consolidation extends to daily operations as well.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Instead of operating two separate DNS systems, customers use one API, one audit trail, one dashboard, and one policy engine for every DNS query—whether it is for a public website or an internal application,” Somoza said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Policy first.</strong> The resolver sits ahead of every lookup, not behind it. “Architecturally, Cloudflare Gateway becomes the resolver that customers connect to, and can use WARP, DNS over HTTPS, DNS over TLS, or traditional DNS,” Somoza said. “Gateway evaluates zero -trust policies first, then routes the query to the appropriate DNS view based on context, such as source IP, device posture, or network location.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>No public path in.</strong> Internal zones sit outside the public DNS hierarchy entirely. “Internal zones are never assigned public nameservers—they are only reachable through Gateway, so every query is evaluated before it is resolved,” Somoza said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>One hostname, multiple answers.</strong> Branch offices, data centers and cloud environments no longer each need their own resolver stack. “Operationally, this simplifies environments that span branch offices, data centers, and multiple clouds,” Somoza said. “The same internal hostname can return different answers depending on where the request originated without maintaining separate resolver infrastructure, conditional forwarders, or duplicate zone files.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Somoza described the underlying objective in direct terms: “The goal is to make internal DNS behave like a single service instead of a collection of independent deployments,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>View selection.</strong> The same hostname can resolve to different IP addresses depending on where the request comes from. Gateway makes that call using several client signals. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“View selection is policy driven,” Somoza said. “Gateway resolver policies evaluate the context of each DNS query, including attributes like source IP, device identity, or network location and determine which DNS view should answer the request.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A view is a container, not a separate infrastructure stack. Somoza explained that a view is simply a logical grouping of internal zones. For example, a company could have separate views for Europe and North America, or for corporate users and operational technology networks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Latency and resilience.</strong> Internal DNS inherits its performance characteristics from Cloudflare’s existing public network. “Internal DNS runs on Cloudflare’s global network, so queries are answered by the nearest available Gateway location, helping keep latency low for connected users,” Somoza said. “Because Internal DNS runs on the same global infrastructure as Cloudflare’s public DNS, it benefits from the same anycast architecture, geographic distribution, and resilient network design.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How this differs from split-horizon DNS</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Internal DNS replaces the duplicate-zone model traditional split-horizon setups depend on.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Before migrating, many organizations maintain multiple versions of the same internal DNS zones across headquarters, branch offices, and cloud environments,” Somoza explained. “Conditional forwarders determine which resolver answers each query, and keeping those environments synchronized becomes an ongoing operational task.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Internal DNS collapses those duplicate zones into a single authoritative copy split across views instead. “With Internal DNS, that configuration becomes much simpler,” Somoza said. “A customer might create a single corp.internal zone in Cloudflare and define multiple DNS views.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For example, users in headquarters could receive one internal IP address for wiki.corp.internal, while branch offices receive a different address. Somoza emphasized that the zone itself only exists once. “Instead of maintaining multiple copies of the same configuration, administrators manage a single source of truth,” he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Early use cases and migration challenges</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not surprisingly, Somoza noted that the first use case Cloudflare sees for Internal DNS is for split-horizon DNS consolidation. There is also interest from organizations that operate across multiple cloud providers that want one consistent internal DNS service instead of managing separate DNS platforms in each environment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another common use case is extending zero-trust policies to internal name resolution. “Customers already use Gateway to control access to internet traffic, and Internal DNS lets them apply similar policy decisions before internal names are resolved,” Somoza said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When it comes to migration, the friction customers report during migration is procedural rather than architectural. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Customers need to think through API permissions, connectivity, and how existing local DNS forwarding rules interact with Gateway,” Somoza said. “Those are all well understood migration steps and customers often run both environments in parallel before completing the transition.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Model Context Protocol is going stateless to make scaling simpler]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Model Context Protocol (MCP), the emerging standard for connecting AI models to external tools and enterprise data, is undergoing its biggest architectural overhaul yet.



The latest release candidate, scheduled for release on July 28, removes protocol-level sessions in favor of a stateless arch...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691919/ai-nachrichten/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691919/ai-nachrichten/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:40:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Model Context Protocol (<a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">MCP</a>), the emerging standard for connecting AI models to external tools and enterprise data, is undergoing its biggest architectural overhaul yet.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The latest <a href="https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/draft/changelog" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">release candidate</a>, scheduled for release on July 28, removes protocol-level sessions in favor of a stateless architecture, a change which industry experts say is intended to make MCP easier to deploy across standard cloud infrastructure as enterprises move AI pilots into production.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The session-based model made sense when MCP servers were local processes on a developer’s laptop. In production, it became an operational tax,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/muskan-bandta2004" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Muskan Bandta</a>, cloud associate at ZopDev.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When your infrastructure team asks whether MCP services can scale like other cloud applications, the answer used to be ‘not quite.’ With the move to a stateless architecture, the answer is now yes,” Bandta added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Earlier versions of the protocol maintained information about every client connection, meaning servers had to keep track of each session throughout an interaction. While that approach worked well for local development, it complicated deployments across multiple servers because requests often had to be routed back to the same machine, limiting scalability and making MCP a less natural fit for modern cloud architectures.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Under the new stateless design, every request contains the information needed for any available server to process it independently. Applications that need to maintain context across multiple requests can still do so, but developers must now manage that state explicitly rather than relying on the protocol itself,” she said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This transition to a stateless design goes beyond simplifying infrastructure by fundamentally changing how AI applications manage and share context across tools, according to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/znamit/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Amit Jena</a>, AI development manager at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of keeping application state hidden inside protocol sessions, the new design makes it explicit, allowing AI models to access, reason over, and pass that information between tools, giving developers greater control over how context is preserved and shared across tools, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It should also make AI workflows more portable, resilient, and easier to orchestrate across distributed environments, he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">MCP’s new features</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Other changes to MCP include the addition of a Multi Round-Trip Requests (MRTR) mechanism that changes how AI agents request additional information they need to complete a task.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of relying on a persistent connection between the client and server throughout the interaction, the new mechanism lets the server request additional input through a standard request-response exchange before continuing the task, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Routable transport headers, another addition, enable API gateways and other networking infrastructure to identify and route MCP requests without inspecting their contents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They reduce processing overhead, lower latency, and let enterprise teams enforce routing, rate-limiting and security policies more efficiently using existing API management infrastructure, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">MCP is also getting an updated authorization framework built around OAuth 2.1 and OpenID Connect; interactive MCP Apps; and deterministic caching of tool and resource listings to improve LLM prompt-cache hit rates, potentially saving on token costs.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Rebuilding the trust boundary</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The MCP release steering committee also decided to deprecate some legacy features, including Roots, Sampling, Logging, the older HTTP+SSE transport and Dynamic Client Registration, although these will continue to work in this version and any other released over the next year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The deprecation of Sampling is likely to have the biggest impact because it changes who is responsible for interacting with foundation models, said Jena.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Sampling let MCP servers invoke the <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335213/large-language-models-the-foundations-of-generative-ai.html" target="_blank">LLM</a> through the client, which meant the server had a callback path into the model without owning that connection. Deprecating it means rebuilding that trust boundary,” Jena said. “Your server now calls the model provider directly. That changes your network architecture, your auth model, and depending on how you’ve built cost attribution, your billing flow.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The year-long transition period will be enough for teams to audit their sampling dependencies now, said Jena: “The risk is that teams who haven’t implemented sampling themselves won’t know if a third-party MCP server they’re depending on uses it.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Updated MCP SDKs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To accompany the protocol update, there are updated <a href="https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MCP SDKs</a> for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253770/what-is-python-powerful-intuitive-programming.html" target="_blank">Python</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257305/what-is-typescript-strongly-typed-javascript.html" target="_blank">Typescript</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253031/whats-the-go-language-really-good-for-3.html">Go</a>, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4131649/the-best-new-features-of-c-14.html">C#</a>. These support both the old and new protocol versions, so new clients can continue communicating with older servers, while updated servers will also support older clients, reducing the risk of immediate disruptions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That backward compatibility should make the transition largely incremental, except for enterprises that built custom infrastructure around MCP’s earlier session-based architecture, Bandta said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Identifying and auditing those session dependencies may not be easy, Jena warned.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Session management complexity tends to be hidden across multiple layers — the gateway config, the deployment scripts, the monitoring dashboards. The code change is small; finding everywhere the assumption lives is what takes time,” he said.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Model Context Protocol is going stateless to make scaling simpler]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Model Context Protocol (MCP), the emerging standard for connecting AI models to external tools and enterprise data, is undergoing its biggest architectural overhaul yet.



The latest release candidate, scheduled for release on July 28, removes protocol-level sessions in favor of a stateless arch...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691907/it-nachrichten/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691907/it-nachrichten/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:38:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Model Context Protocol (<a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">MCP</a>), the emerging standard for connecting AI models to external tools and enterprise data, is undergoing its biggest architectural overhaul yet.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The latest <a href="https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/draft/changelog" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">release candidate</a>, scheduled for release on July 28, removes protocol-level sessions in favor of a stateless architecture, a change which industry experts say is intended to make MCP easier to deploy across standard cloud infrastructure as enterprises move AI pilots into production.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The session-based model made sense when MCP servers were local processes on a developer’s laptop. In production, it became an operational tax,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/muskan-bandta2004" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Muskan Bandta</a>, cloud associate at ZopDev.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When your infrastructure team asks whether MCP services can scale like other cloud applications, the answer used to be ‘not quite.’ With the move to a stateless architecture, the answer is now yes,” Bandta added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Earlier versions of the protocol maintained information about every client connection, meaning servers had to keep track of each session throughout an interaction. While that approach worked well for local development, it complicated deployments across multiple servers because requests often had to be routed back to the same machine, limiting scalability and making MCP a less natural fit for modern cloud architectures.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Under the new stateless design, every request contains the information needed for any available server to process it independently. Applications that need to maintain context across multiple requests can still do so, but developers must now manage that state explicitly rather than relying on the protocol itself,” she said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This transition to a stateless design goes beyond simplifying infrastructure by fundamentally changing how AI applications manage and share context across tools, according to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/znamit/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Amit Jena</a>, AI development manager at IT consulting firm Kanerika.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of keeping application state hidden inside protocol sessions, the new design makes it explicit, allowing AI models to access, reason over, and pass that information between tools, giving developers greater control over how context is preserved and shared across tools, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It should also make AI workflows more portable, resilient, and easier to orchestrate across distributed environments, he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">MCP’s new features</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Other changes to MCP include the addition of a Multi Round-Trip Requests (MRTR) mechanism that changes how AI agents request additional information they need to complete a task.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead of relying on a persistent connection between the client and server throughout the interaction, the new mechanism lets the server request additional input through a standard request-response exchange before continuing the task, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Routable transport headers, another addition, enable API gateways and other networking infrastructure to identify and route MCP requests without inspecting their contents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They reduce processing overhead, lower latency, and let enterprise teams enforce routing, rate-limiting and security policies more efficiently using existing API management infrastructure, Jena said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">MCP is also getting an updated authorization framework built around OAuth 2.1 and OpenID Connect; interactive MCP Apps; and deterministic caching of tool and resource listings to improve LLM prompt-cache hit rates, potentially saving on token costs.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Rebuilding the trust boundary</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The MCP release steering committee also decided to deprecate some legacy features, including Roots, Sampling, Logging, the older HTTP+SSE transport and Dynamic Client Registration, although these will continue to work in this version and any other released over the next year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The deprecation of Sampling is likely to have the biggest impact because it changes who is responsible for interacting with foundation models, said Jena.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Sampling let MCP servers invoke the <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335213/large-language-models-the-foundations-of-generative-ai.html" target="_blank">LLM</a> through the client, which meant the server had a callback path into the model without owning that connection. Deprecating it means rebuilding that trust boundary,” Jena said. “Your server now calls the model provider directly. That changes your network architecture, your auth model, and depending on how you’ve built cost attribution, your billing flow.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The year-long transition period will be enough for teams to audit their sampling dependencies now, said Jena: “The risk is that teams who haven’t implemented sampling themselves won’t know if a third-party MCP server they’re depending on uses it.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Updated MCP SDKs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To accompany the protocol update, there are updated <a href="https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MCP SDKs</a> for <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253770/what-is-python-powerful-intuitive-programming.html" target="_blank">Python</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257305/what-is-typescript-strongly-typed-javascript.html" target="_blank">Typescript</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253031/whats-the-go-language-really-good-for-3.html">Go</a>, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4131649/the-best-new-features-of-c-14.html">C#</a>. These support both the old and new protocol versions, so new clients can continue communicating with older servers, while updated servers will also support older clients, reducing the risk of immediate disruptions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That backward compatibility should make the transition largely incremental, except for enterprises that built custom infrastructure around MCP’s earlier session-based architecture, Bandta said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Identifying and auditing those session dependencies may not be easy, Jena warned.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Session management complexity tends to be hidden across multiple layers — the gateway config, the deployment scripts, the monitoring dashboards. The code change is small; finding everywhere the assumption lives is what takes time,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4201254/model-context-protocol-is-going-stateless-to-make-scaling-simpler.html">InfoWorld</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Debt Collection Suits Have Risen Sharply. There’s Help for Consumers Being Sued.]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Consumers are being taken to court in droves for delinquent credit card and other bills. New legal protections and even A.I. could be a lifeline.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691665/ai-nachrichten/debt-collection-suits-have-risen-sharply-theres-help-for-consumers-being-sued/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691665/ai-nachrichten/debt-collection-suits-have-risen-sharply-theres-help-for-consumers-being-sued/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 15:25:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Consumers are being taken to court in droves for delinquent credit card and other bills. New legal protections and even A.I. could be a lifeline.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8604-1: Linux kernel (Azure) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - Foo-over-UDP (FOU);
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic AP...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691501/unix-server/usn-8604-1-linux-kernel-azure-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691501/unix-server/usn-8604-1-linux-kernel-azure-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:17:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - Foo-over-UDP (FOU);
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Drivers core;
  - Null block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - DPLL subsystem;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - On-Chip Interconnect management framework;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - Modular ISDN driver;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - UACCE accelerator framework;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Network drivers;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PHY drivers;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - USB over IP driver;
  - W1 Dallas's 1-wire bus driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - EFI Variable file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) client;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - SMB network file system;
  - Memory Management;
  - Kernel thread helper (kthread);
  - Memory management;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - Netfilter;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Hibernation control;
  - Timer subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Floating proportions library;
  - Scatterlist API;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Networking core;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NET/ROM layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - Network traffic control;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - ALSA AC97 driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - Texas InstrumentS Audio (ASoC/HDA) drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
(CVE-2025-71158, CVE-2025-71160, CVE-2025-71161, CVE-2025-71162,
CVE-2025-71163, CVE-2025-71180, CVE-2025-71182, CVE-2025-71183,
CVE-2025-71184, CVE-2025-71185, CVE-2025-71186, CVE-2025-71187,
CVE-2025-71188, CVE-2025-71189, CVE-2025-71190, CVE-2025-71191,
CVE-2025-71192, CVE-2025-71193, CVE-2025-71194, CVE-2025-71195,
CVE-2025-71196, CVE-2025-71197, CVE-2025-71198, CVE-2025-71199,
CVE-2025-71200, CVE-2025-71201, CVE-2026-22976, CVE-2026-22977,
CVE-2026-22978, CVE-2026-22979, CVE-2026-22980, CVE-2026-22981,
CVE-2026-22982, CVE-2026-22984, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22986,
CVE-2026-22987, CVE-2026-22989, CVE-2026-22990, CVE-2026-22991,
CVE-2026-22992, CVE-2026-22993, CVE-2026-22994, CVE-2026-22996,
CVE-2026-22997, CVE-2026-22998, CVE-2026-22999, CVE-2026-23000,
CVE-2026-23001, CVE-2026-23002, CVE-2026-23003, CVE-2026-23004,
CVE-2026-23005, CVE-2026-23006, CVE-2026-23007, CVE-2026-23008,
CVE-2026-23009, CVE-2026-23010, CVE-2026-23011, CVE-2026-23012,
CVE-2026-23013, CVE-2026-23014, CVE-2026-23015, CVE-2026-23017,
CVE-2026-23018, CVE-2026-23019, CVE-2026-23020, CVE-2026-23021,
CVE-2026-23022, CVE-2026-23023, CVE-2026-23024, CVE-2026-23025,
CVE-2026-23026, CVE-2026-23030, CVE-2026-23031, CVE-2026-23032,
CVE-2026-23033, CVE-2026-23034, CVE-2026-23035, CVE-2026-23036,
CVE-2026-23037, CVE-2026-23038, CVE-2026-23042, CVE-2026-23044,
CVE-2026-23045, CVE-2026-23046, CVE-2026-23047, CVE-2026-23049,
CVE-2026-23050, CVE-2026-23051, CVE-2026-23052, CVE-2026-23053,
CVE-2026-23054, CVE-2026-23055, CVE-2026-23056, CVE-2026-23057,
CVE-2026-23058, CVE-2026-23059, CVE-2026-23061, CVE-2026-23062,
CVE-2026-23063, CVE-2026-23064, CVE-2026-23065, CVE-2026-23066,
CVE-2026-23067, CVE-2026-23068, CVE-2026-23069, CVE-2026-23070,
CVE-2026-23071, CVE-2026-23072, CVE-2026-23073, CVE-2026-23075,
CVE-2026-23076, CVE-2026-23077, CVE-2026-23078, CVE-2026-23079,
CVE-2026-23080, CVE-2026-23081, CVE-2026-23083, CVE-2026-23084,
CVE-2026-23085, CVE-2026-23086, CVE-2026-23087, CVE-2026-23088,
CVE-2026-23089, CVE-2026-23090, CVE-2026-23092, CVE-2026-23093,
CVE-2026-23094, CVE-2026-23095, CVE-2026-23096, CVE-2026-23097,
CVE-2026-23098, CVE-2026-23099, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23101,
CVE-2026-23102, CVE-2026-23103, CVE-2026-23104, CVE-2026-23105,
CVE-2026-23106, CVE-2026-23107, CVE-2026-23108, CVE-2026-23109,
CVE-2026-23110, CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23114, CVE-2026-23115,
CVE-2026-23116, CVE-2026-23118, CVE-2026-23119, CVE-2026-23120,
CVE-2026-23121, CVE-2026-23122, CVE-2026-23123, CVE-2026-23124,
CVE-2026-23125, CVE-2026-23126, CVE-2026-23128, CVE-2026-23129,
CVE-2026-23130, CVE-2026-23131, CVE-2026-23133, CVE-2026-23135,
CVE-2026-23136, CVE-2026-23137, CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23139,
CVE-2026-23140, CVE-2026-23141, CVE-2026-23142, CVE-2026-23143,
CVE-2026-23144, CVE-2026-23145, CVE-2026-23146, CVE-2026-23147,
CVE-2026-23148, CVE-2026-23150, CVE-2026-23151, CVE-2026-23152,
CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23156, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23158,
CVE-2026-23159, CVE-2026-23160, CVE-2026-23161, CVE-2026-23162,
CVE-2026-23163, CVE-2026-23164, CVE-2026-23165, CVE-2026-23166,
CVE-2026-23167, CVE-2026-23168, CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23170,
CVE-2026-23171, CVE-2026-23172, CVE-2026-23173, CVE-2026-23212,
CVE-2026-23272, CVE-2026-23278, CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23427,
CVE-2026-23428, CVE-2026-23450, CVE-2026-23455, CVE-2026-31402,
CVE-2026-31418, CVE-2026-31436, CVE-2026-31448, CVE-2026-31478,
CVE-2026-31607, CVE-2026-31635, CVE-2026-31637, CVE-2026-31649,
CVE-2026-31657, CVE-2026-31659, CVE-2026-31668, CVE-2026-31669,
CVE-2026-31682, CVE-2026-31685, CVE-2026-31718, CVE-2026-43011,
CVE-2026-43037, CVE-2026-43038, CVE-2026-43071, CVE-2026-43083,
CVE-2026-43114, CVE-2026-43117, CVE-2026-43125, CVE-2026-43185,
CVE-2026-43186, CVE-2026-43197, CVE-2026-43304, CVE-2026-43341,
CVE-2026-43376, CVE-2026-43378, CVE-2026-43383, CVE-2026-43384,
CVE-2026-43402, CVE-2026-43406, CVE-2026-43407, CVE-2026-43414,
CVE-2026-43493, CVE-2026-43501, CVE-2026-45898, CVE-2026-45988,
CVE-2026-46039, CVE-2026-46043, CVE-2026-46084, CVE-2026-46115,
CVE-2026-46119, CVE-2026-46135, CVE-2026-46185, CVE-2026-46195,
CVE-2026-46243, CVE-2026-46244, CVE-2026-46266, CVE-2026-46289,
CVE-2026-46290, CVE-2026-46316, CVE-2026-46317, CVE-2026-46325,
CVE-2026-53277, CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64034)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8605-1: Linux kernel (Azure CVM) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - Foo-over-UDP (FOU);
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic AP...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691500/unix-server/usn-8605-1-linux-kernel-azure-cvm-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691500/unix-server/usn-8605-1-linux-kernel-azure-cvm-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:17:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - Foo-over-UDP (FOU);
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Drivers core;
  - Null block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - DPLL subsystem;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - On-Chip Interconnect management framework;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - Modular ISDN driver;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - UACCE accelerator framework;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Network drivers;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PHY drivers;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - USB over IP driver;
  - W1 Dallas's 1-wire bus driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - EFI Variable file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) client;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - SMB network file system;
  - Memory Management;
  - Kernel thread helper (kthread);
  - Memory management;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - Netfilter;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Hibernation control;
  - Timer subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Floating proportions library;
  - Scatterlist API;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Networking core;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NET/ROM layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - Network traffic control;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - ALSA AC97 driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - Texas InstrumentS Audio (ASoC/HDA) drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
(CVE-2025-71158, CVE-2025-71160, CVE-2025-71161, CVE-2025-71162,
CVE-2025-71163, CVE-2025-71180, CVE-2025-71182, CVE-2025-71183,
CVE-2025-71184, CVE-2025-71185, CVE-2025-71186, CVE-2025-71187,
CVE-2025-71188, CVE-2025-71189, CVE-2025-71190, CVE-2025-71191,
CVE-2025-71192, CVE-2025-71193, CVE-2025-71194, CVE-2025-71195,
CVE-2025-71196, CVE-2025-71197, CVE-2025-71198, CVE-2025-71199,
CVE-2025-71200, CVE-2025-71201, CVE-2026-22976, CVE-2026-22977,
CVE-2026-22978, CVE-2026-22979, CVE-2026-22980, CVE-2026-22981,
CVE-2026-22982, CVE-2026-22984, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22986,
CVE-2026-22987, CVE-2026-22989, CVE-2026-22990, CVE-2026-22991,
CVE-2026-22992, CVE-2026-22993, CVE-2026-22994, CVE-2026-22996,
CVE-2026-22997, CVE-2026-22998, CVE-2026-22999, CVE-2026-23000,
CVE-2026-23001, CVE-2026-23002, CVE-2026-23003, CVE-2026-23004,
CVE-2026-23005, CVE-2026-23006, CVE-2026-23007, CVE-2026-23008,
CVE-2026-23009, CVE-2026-23010, CVE-2026-23011, CVE-2026-23012,
CVE-2026-23013, CVE-2026-23014, CVE-2026-23015, CVE-2026-23017,
CVE-2026-23018, CVE-2026-23019, CVE-2026-23020, CVE-2026-23021,
CVE-2026-23022, CVE-2026-23023, CVE-2026-23024, CVE-2026-23025,
CVE-2026-23026, CVE-2026-23030, CVE-2026-23031, CVE-2026-23032,
CVE-2026-23033, CVE-2026-23034, CVE-2026-23035, CVE-2026-23036,
CVE-2026-23037, CVE-2026-23038, CVE-2026-23042, CVE-2026-23044,
CVE-2026-23045, CVE-2026-23046, CVE-2026-23047, CVE-2026-23049,
CVE-2026-23050, CVE-2026-23051, CVE-2026-23052, CVE-2026-23053,
CVE-2026-23054, CVE-2026-23055, CVE-2026-23056, CVE-2026-23057,
CVE-2026-23058, CVE-2026-23059, CVE-2026-23061, CVE-2026-23062,
CVE-2026-23063, CVE-2026-23064, CVE-2026-23065, CVE-2026-23066,
CVE-2026-23067, CVE-2026-23068, CVE-2026-23069, CVE-2026-23070,
CVE-2026-23071, CVE-2026-23072, CVE-2026-23073, CVE-2026-23075,
CVE-2026-23076, CVE-2026-23077, CVE-2026-23078, CVE-2026-23080,
CVE-2026-23081, CVE-2026-23083, CVE-2026-23084, CVE-2026-23085,
CVE-2026-23086, CVE-2026-23087, CVE-2026-23088, CVE-2026-23089,
CVE-2026-23090, CVE-2026-23092, CVE-2026-23093, CVE-2026-23094,
CVE-2026-23095, CVE-2026-23096, CVE-2026-23097, CVE-2026-23098,
CVE-2026-23099, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23101, CVE-2026-23102,
CVE-2026-23103, CVE-2026-23104, CVE-2026-23105, CVE-2026-23106,
CVE-2026-23107, CVE-2026-23108, CVE-2026-23109, CVE-2026-23110,
CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23114, CVE-2026-23115, CVE-2026-23116,
CVE-2026-23118, CVE-2026-23119, CVE-2026-23120, CVE-2026-23121,
CVE-2026-23122, CVE-2026-23123, CVE-2026-23124, CVE-2026-23125,
CVE-2026-23126, CVE-2026-23128, CVE-2026-23129, CVE-2026-23130,
CVE-2026-23131, CVE-2026-23133, CVE-2026-23135, CVE-2026-23136,
CVE-2026-23137, CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23139, CVE-2026-23140,
CVE-2026-23141, CVE-2026-23142, CVE-2026-23143, CVE-2026-23144,
CVE-2026-23145, CVE-2026-23146, CVE-2026-23147, CVE-2026-23148,
CVE-2026-23150, CVE-2026-23151, CVE-2026-23152, CVE-2026-23154,
CVE-2026-23156, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23158, CVE-2026-23159,
CVE-2026-23160, CVE-2026-23161, CVE-2026-23162, CVE-2026-23163,
CVE-2026-23164, CVE-2026-23165, CVE-2026-23166, CVE-2026-23167,
CVE-2026-23168, CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23170, CVE-2026-23171,
CVE-2026-23172, CVE-2026-23173, CVE-2026-23212, CVE-2026-23272,
CVE-2026-23278, CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23427, CVE-2026-23428,
CVE-2026-23450, CVE-2026-23455, CVE-2026-31402, CVE-2026-31418,
CVE-2026-31436, CVE-2026-31448, CVE-2026-31478, CVE-2026-31607,
CVE-2026-31635, CVE-2026-31637, CVE-2026-31649, CVE-2026-31657,
CVE-2026-31659, CVE-2026-31668, CVE-2026-31669, CVE-2026-31682,
CVE-2026-31685, CVE-2026-31718, CVE-2026-43011, CVE-2026-43037,
CVE-2026-43038, CVE-2026-43071, CVE-2026-43083, CVE-2026-43114,
CVE-2026-43117, CVE-2026-43125, CVE-2026-43185, CVE-2026-43186,
CVE-2026-43197, CVE-2026-43304, CVE-2026-43341, CVE-2026-43376,
CVE-2026-43378, CVE-2026-43383, CVE-2026-43384, CVE-2026-43402,
CVE-2026-43406, CVE-2026-43407, CVE-2026-43414, CVE-2026-43493,
CVE-2026-43501, CVE-2026-45898, CVE-2026-45988, CVE-2026-46039,
CVE-2026-46043, CVE-2026-46084, CVE-2026-46115, CVE-2026-46119,
CVE-2026-46135, CVE-2026-46185, CVE-2026-46195, CVE-2026-46243,
CVE-2026-46244, CVE-2026-46266, CVE-2026-46289, CVE-2026-46290,
CVE-2026-46316, CVE-2026-46317, CVE-2026-46325, CVE-2026-53277,
CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64034)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8595-2: Linux kernel (AWS) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691499/unix-server/usn-8595-2-linux-kernel-aws-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691499/unix-server/usn-8595-2-linux-kernel-aws-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:17:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - CXL (Compute Express Link) drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Fastrpc Driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Ethernet team driver;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Microchip PolarFire SoC system controller driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM TDX Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Memory Management;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Networking core;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - Landlock security;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - Samsung ASoC drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2025-21709, CVE-2025-22116, CVE-2025-38426, CVE-2025-39764,
CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40150, CVE-2025-68175, CVE-2025-68239,
CVE-2025-68334, CVE-2025-68736, CVE-2025-71152, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71203, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71269, CVE-2025-71287,
CVE-2025-71288, CVE-2026-22981, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22993,
CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23104, CVE-2026-23118,
CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23171,
CVE-2026-23207, CVE-2026-23226, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23244,
CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23246, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23255,
CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23276, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23285,
CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290,
CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23292, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296,
CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23302, CVE-2026-23303,
CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23306, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23308,
CVE-2026-23310, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23313, CVE-2026-23315,
CVE-2026-23317, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321,
CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23325, CVE-2026-23330, CVE-2026-23334,
CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340,
CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23347, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356,
CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23360, CVE-2026-23361,
CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23363, CVE-2026-23364, CVE-2026-23365,
CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23369, CVE-2026-23370,
CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23374, CVE-2026-23375, CVE-2026-23378,
CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23383,
CVE-2026-23386, CVE-2026-23387, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23389,
CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397,
CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23412,
CVE-2026-23413, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23418, CVE-2026-23419,
CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23426, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438,
CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23440, CVE-2026-23441, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23447, CVE-2026-23448,
CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23456,
CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23461,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23464, CVE-2026-23465,
CVE-2026-23468, CVE-2026-23470, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475,
CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31392, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31394, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400,
CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408,
CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31412, CVE-2026-31413, CVE-2026-31414,
CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31426, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31429,
CVE-2026-31430, CVE-2026-31432, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31434,
CVE-2026-31438, CVE-2026-31439, CVE-2026-31440, CVE-2026-31441,
CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31449, CVE-2026-31450,
CVE-2026-31451, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31453, CVE-2026-31454,
CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31458, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466,
CVE-2026-31467, CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31470, CVE-2026-31473,
CVE-2026-31474, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31477, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31482, CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31487,
CVE-2026-31488, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31492, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498,
CVE-2026-31499, CVE-2026-31500, CVE-2026-31502, CVE-2026-31503,
CVE-2026-31505, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31509,
CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31511, CVE-2026-31512, CVE-2026-31515,
CVE-2026-31516, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31519, CVE-2026-31520,
CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523, CVE-2026-31524,
CVE-2026-31525, CVE-2026-31527, CVE-2026-31528, CVE-2026-31530,
CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31542, CVE-2026-31545,
CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31548, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550,
CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31554, CVE-2026-31555,
CVE-2026-31556, CVE-2026-31557, CVE-2026-31563, CVE-2026-31565,
CVE-2026-31566, CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31575, CVE-2026-31576,
CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580, CVE-2026-31581,
CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584, CVE-2026-31585,
CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590,
CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596, CVE-2026-31597,
CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602, CVE-2026-31603,
CVE-2026-31604, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606, CVE-2026-31610,
CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612, CVE-2026-31613, CVE-2026-31615,
CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619,
CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625,
CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629,
CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31638, CVE-2026-31639, CVE-2026-31642,
CVE-2026-31645, CVE-2026-31646, CVE-2026-31648, CVE-2026-31651,
CVE-2026-31655, CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31660,
CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665,
CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672,
CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31675, CVE-2026-31677,
CVE-2026-31678, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31681,
CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686, CVE-2026-31689,
CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696, CVE-2026-31697,
CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700, CVE-2026-31701,
CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31704, CVE-2026-31705, CVE-2026-31706,
CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708, CVE-2026-31709, CVE-2026-31711,
CVE-2026-31712, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715, CVE-2026-31716,
CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31722, CVE-2026-31723,
CVE-2026-31724, CVE-2026-31725, CVE-2026-31726, CVE-2026-31728,
CVE-2026-31729, CVE-2026-31730, CVE-2026-31731, CVE-2026-31737,
CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31740, CVE-2026-31741, CVE-2026-31747,
CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752,
CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758,
CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763,
CVE-2026-31767, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-31770, CVE-2026-31772,
CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31779, CVE-2026-31780,
CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43007, CVE-2026-43012,
CVE-2026-43013, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015, CVE-2026-43016,
CVE-2026-43017, CVE-2026-43018, CVE-2026-43019, CVE-2026-43020,
CVE-2026-43023, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025, CVE-2026-43026,
CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43032,
CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43036, CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43041,
CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43044, CVE-2026-43046, CVE-2026-43047,
CVE-2026-43049, CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052,
CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43056, CVE-2026-43057, CVE-2026-43058,
CVE-2026-43059, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061, CVE-2026-43062,
CVE-2026-43064, CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068,
CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073, CVE-2026-43074,
CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079, CVE-2026-43080,
CVE-2026-43081, CVE-2026-43082, CVE-2026-43084, CVE-2026-43085,
CVE-2026-43086, CVE-2026-43088, CVE-2026-43089, CVE-2026-43091,
CVE-2026-43092, CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43094, CVE-2026-43098,
CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104, CVE-2026-43105,
CVE-2026-43107, CVE-2026-43109, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111,
CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43119, CVE-2026-43120,
CVE-2026-43129, CVE-2026-43162, CVE-2026-43245, CVE-2026-43252,
CVE-2026-43265, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43324, CVE-2026-43327,
CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43330, CVE-2026-43332,
CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43338,
CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342, CVE-2026-43343,
CVE-2026-43345, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43355, CVE-2026-43357,
CVE-2026-43359, CVE-2026-43360, CVE-2026-43361, CVE-2026-43362,
CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43366, CVE-2026-43368,
CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43371, CVE-2026-43372, CVE-2026-43373,
CVE-2026-43377, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381, CVE-2026-43382,
CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43395, CVE-2026-43397,
CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43408, CVE-2026-43409, CVE-2026-43411,
CVE-2026-43412, CVE-2026-43413, CVE-2026-43415, CVE-2026-43419,
CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43421, CVE-2026-43424, CVE-2026-43425,
CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428, CVE-2026-43429,
CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43436, CVE-2026-43437,
CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43441, CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43448,
CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451, CVE-2026-43452,
CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43455, CVE-2026-43456, CVE-2026-43457,
CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43467,
CVE-2026-43468, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43471, CVE-2026-43472,
CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476, CVE-2026-43480,
CVE-2026-43483, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43488, CVE-2026-43490,
CVE-2026-43491, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496,
CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43499, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839,
CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843,
CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45855,
CVE-2026-45858, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45920,
CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45942, CVE-2026-45943, CVE-2026-45956,
CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987,
CVE-2026-45989, CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-45996,
CVE-2026-45997, CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46003,
CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46007,
CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012, CVE-2026-46015,
CVE-2026-46016, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46021,
CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46026,
CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037,
CVE-2026-46038, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041, CVE-2026-46044,
CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050,
CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46056,
CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46063,
CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46068, CVE-2026-46069,
CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073, CVE-2026-46075,
CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078, CVE-2026-46079,
CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083, CVE-2026-46084,
CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089, CVE-2026-46090,
CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46094, CVE-2026-46098,
CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46103,
CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46110,
CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113, CVE-2026-46114,
CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125,
CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129,
CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46136,
CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139, CVE-2026-46142,
CVE-2026-46143, CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146,
CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46152,
CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160, CVE-2026-46161,
CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174,
CVE-2026-46176, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179,
CVE-2026-46180, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187,
CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46193,
CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201, CVE-2026-46204,
CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46207, CVE-2026-46208,
CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46214,
CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46225,
CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46229, CVE-2026-46230,
CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234,
CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46241,
CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46280, CVE-2026-46282,
CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286, CVE-2026-46287, CVE-2026-46291,
CVE-2026-46292, CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46296,
CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304,
CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46314,
CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52925,
CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52951, CVE-2026-52954,
CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52961,
CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964, CVE-2026-52967,
CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52974,
CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52981, CVE-2026-52982,
CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52989,
CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002,
CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011,
CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014, CVE-2026-53015,
CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023,
CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034, CVE-2026-53035,
CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040,
CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046,
CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050,
CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53058, CVE-2026-53059,
CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53063,
CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066, CVE-2026-53068,
CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073,
CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084, CVE-2026-53085,
CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53094,
CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098, CVE-2026-53110,
CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53117,
CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53126, CVE-2026-53128,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53289,
CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295,
CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53369,
CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375, CVE-2026-53376, CVE-2026-53379,
CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63843, CVE-2026-63844, CVE-2026-63845,
CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847, CVE-2026-63848, CVE-2026-63851,
CVE-2026-63852, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855, CVE-2026-63856,
CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862, CVE-2026-63865,
CVE-2026-64164)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8606-1: Linux kernel (Azure) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691498/unix-server/usn-8606-1-linux-kernel-azure-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691498/unix-server/usn-8606-1-linux-kernel-azure-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:17:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - ATM drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - RNBD block device driver;
  - Ublk userspace block driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - Clocksource drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - CPU idle management framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - CXL (Compute Express Link) drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Multifunction device drivers;
  - Broadcom VK accelerator driver;
  - Fastrpc Driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MOST (Media Oriented Systems Transport) drivers;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Ethernet team driver;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Performance monitor drivers;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - RapidIO drivers;
  - RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) subsystem;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - RPMSG subsystem;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - MediaTek SoC drivers;
  - Microchip PolarFire SoC system controller driver;
  - Texas Instruments SoC drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - ChipIdea USB driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - DesignWare USB3 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - USB over IP driver;
  - vDPA drivers;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Virtio Host (VHOST) subsystem;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM TDX Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FAT file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - JFS file system;
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Proc file system;
  - Pstore file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Memory Management;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Networking core;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Kernel kexec() syscall;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - RCU subsystem;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Scatterlist API;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - 9P file system network protocol;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - KCM (Kernel Connection Multiplexor) sockets driver;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - AppArmor security module;
  - Landlock security;
  - Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel framework;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - Samsung ASoC drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2025-21709, CVE-2025-22116, CVE-2025-38426, CVE-2025-39764,
CVE-2025-40005, CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40150, CVE-2025-68175,
CVE-2025-68239, CVE-2025-68334, CVE-2025-68736, CVE-2025-71152,
CVE-2025-71161, CVE-2025-71203, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71229,
CVE-2025-71231, CVE-2025-71232, CVE-2025-71233, CVE-2025-71235,
CVE-2025-71236, CVE-2025-71237, CVE-2025-71238, CVE-2025-71239,
CVE-2025-71265, CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2025-71269,
CVE-2025-71272, CVE-2025-71273, CVE-2025-71274, CVE-2025-71286,
CVE-2025-71287, CVE-2025-71288, CVE-2025-71291, CVE-2025-71292,
CVE-2025-71294, CVE-2025-71295, CVE-2025-71297, CVE-2025-71304,
CVE-2025-71305, CVE-2026-22981, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22993,
CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23104,
CVE-2026-23118, CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23157,
CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23171, CVE-2026-23207, CVE-2026-23220,
CVE-2026-23221, CVE-2026-23222, CVE-2026-23226, CVE-2026-23227,
CVE-2026-23228, CVE-2026-23229, CVE-2026-23230, CVE-2026-23233,
CVE-2026-23234, CVE-2026-23235, CVE-2026-23236, CVE-2026-23237,
CVE-2026-23238, CVE-2026-23241, CVE-2026-23242, CVE-2026-23243,
CVE-2026-23244, CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23246, CVE-2026-23249,
CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23255, CVE-2026-23266, CVE-2026-23267,
CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23272, CVE-2026-23276,
CVE-2026-23277, CVE-2026-23278, CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281,
CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23285, CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23287,
CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23292,
CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296, CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300,
CVE-2026-23302, CVE-2026-23303, CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23306,
CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23308, CVE-2026-23310, CVE-2026-23312,
CVE-2026-23313, CVE-2026-23315, CVE-2026-23317, CVE-2026-23318,
CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321, CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23325,
CVE-2026-23330, CVE-2026-23334, CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336,
CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23347,
CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359,
CVE-2026-23360, CVE-2026-23361, CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23363,
CVE-2026-23364, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368,
CVE-2026-23369, CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23374,
CVE-2026-23375, CVE-2026-23378, CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381,
CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23383, CVE-2026-23386, CVE-2026-23387,
CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23389, CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23392,
CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397, CVE-2026-23398,
CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23412, CVE-2026-23413,
CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23418, CVE-2026-23419, CVE-2026-23420,
CVE-2026-23426, CVE-2026-23428, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438,
CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23440, CVE-2026-23441, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23447, CVE-2026-23448,
CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23450, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454,
CVE-2026-23455, CVE-2026-23456, CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458,
CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23461, CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463,
CVE-2026-23464, CVE-2026-23465, CVE-2026-23468, CVE-2026-23470,
CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475, CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391,
CVE-2026-31392, CVE-2026-31393, CVE-2026-31394, CVE-2026-31396,
CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400, CVE-2026-31402, CVE-2026-31403,
CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408, CVE-2026-31409,
CVE-2026-31411, CVE-2026-31412, CVE-2026-31414, CVE-2026-31415,
CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31418, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31426, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31429,
CVE-2026-31430, CVE-2026-31432, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31434,
CVE-2026-31436, CVE-2026-31438, CVE-2026-31439, CVE-2026-31440,
CVE-2026-31441, CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31448,
CVE-2026-31449, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31451, CVE-2026-31452,
CVE-2026-31453, CVE-2026-31454, CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31458,
CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467, CVE-2026-31469,
CVE-2026-31470, CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31474, CVE-2026-31476,
CVE-2026-31477, CVE-2026-31478, CVE-2026-31480, CVE-2026-31482,
CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31487, CVE-2026-31488,
CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31492, CVE-2026-31494, CVE-2026-31495,
CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498, CVE-2026-31499,
CVE-2026-31500, CVE-2026-31502, CVE-2026-31503, CVE-2026-31505,
CVE-2026-31506, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31509,
CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31511, CVE-2026-31512, CVE-2026-31515,
CVE-2026-31516, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31519, CVE-2026-31520,
CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523, CVE-2026-31524,
CVE-2026-31525, CVE-2026-31527, CVE-2026-31528, CVE-2026-31530,
CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31542, CVE-2026-31545,
CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31548, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550,
CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31554, CVE-2026-31555,
CVE-2026-31556, CVE-2026-31557, CVE-2026-31563, CVE-2026-31565,
CVE-2026-31566, CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31575, CVE-2026-31576,
CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580, CVE-2026-31581,
CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584, CVE-2026-31585,
CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590,
CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596, CVE-2026-31597,
CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602, CVE-2026-31603,
CVE-2026-31604, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606, CVE-2026-31607,
CVE-2026-31610, CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612, CVE-2026-31613,
CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618,
CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624,
CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628,
CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31637, CVE-2026-31638,
CVE-2026-31639, CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31645, CVE-2026-31646,
CVE-2026-31648, CVE-2026-31649, CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31655,
CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31657, CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31659,
CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664,
CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31668, CVE-2026-31669,
CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673,
CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31675, CVE-2026-31677, CVE-2026-31678,
CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31681, CVE-2026-31682,
CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31685, CVE-2026-31686,
CVE-2026-31687, CVE-2026-31689, CVE-2026-31693, CVE-2026-31694,
CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696, CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698,
CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700, CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31702,
CVE-2026-31704, CVE-2026-31705, CVE-2026-31706, CVE-2026-31707,
CVE-2026-31708, CVE-2026-31709, CVE-2026-31711, CVE-2026-31712,
CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715, CVE-2026-31716, CVE-2026-31720,
CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31722, CVE-2026-31723, CVE-2026-31724,
CVE-2026-31725, CVE-2026-31726, CVE-2026-31728, CVE-2026-31729,
CVE-2026-31730, CVE-2026-31731, CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738,
CVE-2026-31740, CVE-2026-31741, CVE-2026-31747, CVE-2026-31748,
CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31754,
CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758, CVE-2026-31759,
CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763, CVE-2026-31767,
CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-31770, CVE-2026-31772, CVE-2026-31773,
CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31779, CVE-2026-31780, CVE-2026-31781,
CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43007, CVE-2026-43011, CVE-2026-43012,
CVE-2026-43013, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015, CVE-2026-43016,
CVE-2026-43017, CVE-2026-43018, CVE-2026-43019, CVE-2026-43020,
CVE-2026-43023, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025, CVE-2026-43026,
CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43032,
CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43036, CVE-2026-43037, CVE-2026-43038,
CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43044,
CVE-2026-43046, CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43049, CVE-2026-43050,
CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43056,
CVE-2026-43057, CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43059, CVE-2026-43060,
CVE-2026-43061, CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43064, CVE-2026-43065,
CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43071,
CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073, CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075,
CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079, CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43081,
CVE-2026-43082, CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43086, CVE-2026-43088,
CVE-2026-43089, CVE-2026-43091, CVE-2026-43092, CVE-2026-43093,
CVE-2026-43094, CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103,
CVE-2026-43104, CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43107, CVE-2026-43109,
CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113,
CVE-2026-43114, CVE-2026-43117, CVE-2026-43119, CVE-2026-43120,
CVE-2026-43123, CVE-2026-43124, CVE-2026-43128, CVE-2026-43129,
CVE-2026-43130, CVE-2026-43132, CVE-2026-43133, CVE-2026-43134,
CVE-2026-43135, CVE-2026-43136, CVE-2026-43137, CVE-2026-43139,
CVE-2026-43140, CVE-2026-43141, CVE-2026-43143, CVE-2026-43145,
CVE-2026-43147, CVE-2026-43148, CVE-2026-43149, CVE-2026-43150,
CVE-2026-43152, CVE-2026-43153, CVE-2026-43156, CVE-2026-43157,
CVE-2026-43158, CVE-2026-43159, CVE-2026-43162, CVE-2026-43163,
CVE-2026-43167, CVE-2026-43168, CVE-2026-43169, CVE-2026-43170,
CVE-2026-43171, CVE-2026-43173, CVE-2026-43175, CVE-2026-43180,
CVE-2026-43182, CVE-2026-43183, CVE-2026-43184, CVE-2026-43185,
CVE-2026-43186, CVE-2026-43187, CVE-2026-43189, CVE-2026-43190,
CVE-2026-43194, CVE-2026-43196, CVE-2026-43199, CVE-2026-43200,
CVE-2026-43201, CVE-2026-43202, CVE-2026-43203, CVE-2026-43205,
CVE-2026-43206, CVE-2026-43207, CVE-2026-43209, CVE-2026-43211,
CVE-2026-43212, CVE-2026-43214, CVE-2026-43215, CVE-2026-43218,
CVE-2026-43221, CVE-2026-43222, CVE-2026-43223, CVE-2026-43225,
CVE-2026-43226, CVE-2026-43227, CVE-2026-43230, CVE-2026-43231,
CVE-2026-43232, CVE-2026-43233, CVE-2026-43236, CVE-2026-43238,
CVE-2026-43239, CVE-2026-43241, CVE-2026-43242, CVE-2026-43244,
CVE-2026-43245, CVE-2026-43246, CVE-2026-43248, CVE-2026-43249,
CVE-2026-43250, CVE-2026-43251, CVE-2026-43252, CVE-2026-43253,
CVE-2026-43255, CVE-2026-43256, CVE-2026-43257, CVE-2026-43258,
CVE-2026-43261, CVE-2026-43262, CVE-2026-43264, CVE-2026-43265,
CVE-2026-43266, CVE-2026-43268, CVE-2026-43269, CVE-2026-43270,
CVE-2026-43271, CVE-2026-43273, CVE-2026-43275, CVE-2026-43277,
CVE-2026-43278, CVE-2026-43279, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43283,
CVE-2026-43287, CVE-2026-43288, CVE-2026-43289, CVE-2026-43291,
CVE-2026-43295, CVE-2026-43296, CVE-2026-43297, CVE-2026-43300,
CVE-2026-43302, CVE-2026-43304, CVE-2026-43312, CVE-2026-43313,
CVE-2026-43314, CVE-2026-43315, CVE-2026-43316, CVE-2026-43317,
CVE-2026-43318, CVE-2026-43319, CVE-2026-43320, CVE-2026-43324,
CVE-2026-43327, CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43330,
CVE-2026-43332, CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336,
CVE-2026-43338, CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43341,
CVE-2026-43342, CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43345, CVE-2026-43350,
CVE-2026-43355, CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43359, CVE-2026-43360,
CVE-2026-43361, CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43366,
CVE-2026-43368, CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43372, CVE-2026-43373,
CVE-2026-43377, CVE-2026-43378, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381,
CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43383, CVE-2026-43384, CVE-2026-43386,
CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43395, CVE-2026-43397, CVE-2026-43405,
CVE-2026-43406, CVE-2026-43407, CVE-2026-43408, CVE-2026-43409,
CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43412, CVE-2026-43413, CVE-2026-43414,
CVE-2026-43415, CVE-2026-43419, CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43421,
CVE-2026-43424, CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427,
CVE-2026-43428, CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432,
CVE-2026-43436, CVE-2026-43437, CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43441,
CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43448, CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450,
CVE-2026-43451, CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43455,
CVE-2026-43456, CVE-2026-43457, CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459,
CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43467, CVE-2026-43468, CVE-2026-43469,
CVE-2026-43471, CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475,
CVE-2026-43476, CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43483, CVE-2026-43484,
CVE-2026-43488, CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43491, CVE-2026-43492,
CVE-2026-43493, CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497,
CVE-2026-43499, CVE-2026-43501, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839,
CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843,
CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45847,
CVE-2026-45848, CVE-2026-45849, CVE-2026-45851, CVE-2026-45852,
CVE-2026-45855, CVE-2026-45856, CVE-2026-45857, CVE-2026-45858,
CVE-2026-45859, CVE-2026-45860, CVE-2026-45861, CVE-2026-45862,
CVE-2026-45864, CVE-2026-45865, CVE-2026-45866, CVE-2026-45867,
CVE-2026-45868, CVE-2026-45869, CVE-2026-45870, CVE-2026-45871,
CVE-2026-45872, CVE-2026-45873, CVE-2026-45875, CVE-2026-45877,
CVE-2026-45878, CVE-2026-45879, CVE-2026-45880, CVE-2026-45881,
CVE-2026-45882, CVE-2026-45883, CVE-2026-45884, CVE-2026-45885,
CVE-2026-45886, CVE-2026-45890, CVE-2026-45891, CVE-2026-45893,
CVE-2026-45895, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45902, CVE-2026-45904,
CVE-2026-45905, CVE-2026-45910, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45912,
CVE-2026-45913, CVE-2026-45914, CVE-2026-45915, CVE-2026-45916,
CVE-2026-45917, CVE-2026-45919, CVE-2026-45920, CVE-2026-45921,
CVE-2026-45923, CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45928, CVE-2026-45935,
CVE-2026-45936, CVE-2026-45938, CVE-2026-45941, CVE-2026-45942,
CVE-2026-45943, CVE-2026-45946, CVE-2026-45947, CVE-2026-45948,
CVE-2026-45954, CVE-2026-45956, CVE-2026-45957, CVE-2026-45958,
CVE-2026-45960, CVE-2026-45962, CVE-2026-45964, CVE-2026-45965,
CVE-2026-45968, CVE-2026-45969, CVE-2026-45970, CVE-2026-45972,
CVE-2026-45973, CVE-2026-45974, CVE-2026-45976, CVE-2026-45978,
CVE-2026-45981, CVE-2026-45982, CVE-2026-45983, CVE-2026-45984,
CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45988,
CVE-2026-45989, CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-45996,
CVE-2026-45997, CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46003,
CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46007,
CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012, CVE-2026-46015,
CVE-2026-46016, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46021,
CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46026,
CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037,
CVE-2026-46038, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041, CVE-2026-46043,
CVE-2026-46044, CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049,
CVE-2026-46050, CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053,
CVE-2026-46056, CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062,
CVE-2026-46063, CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46068,
CVE-2026-46069, CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073,
CVE-2026-46075, CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078,
CVE-2026-46079, CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083,
CVE-2026-46084, CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089,
CVE-2026-46090, CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46094,
CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102,
CVE-2026-46103, CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108,
CVE-2026-46110, CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113,
CVE-2026-46114, CVE-2026-46115, CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117,
CVE-2026-46119, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121, CVE-2026-46122,
CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125, CVE-2026-46126,
CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129, CVE-2026-46131,
CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46135, CVE-2026-46136,
CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139, CVE-2026-46142,
CVE-2026-46143, CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146,
CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46152,
CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160, CVE-2026-46161,
CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174,
CVE-2026-46176, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179,
CVE-2026-46180, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46185, CVE-2026-46186,
CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191,
CVE-2026-46193, CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46195, CVE-2026-46196,
CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200,
CVE-2026-46201, CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206,
CVE-2026-46207, CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46211,
CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219,
CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227,
CVE-2026-46229, CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232,
CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236,
CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46243, CVE-2026-46244,
CVE-2026-46246, CVE-2026-46247, CVE-2026-46249, CVE-2026-46250,
CVE-2026-46251, CVE-2026-46253, CVE-2026-46254, CVE-2026-46255,
CVE-2026-46259, CVE-2026-46260, CVE-2026-46261, CVE-2026-46265,
CVE-2026-46266, CVE-2026-46267, CVE-2026-46270, CVE-2026-46273,
CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46280, CVE-2026-46282, CVE-2026-46285,
CVE-2026-46286, CVE-2026-46287, CVE-2026-46289, CVE-2026-46291,
CVE-2026-46292, CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46296,
CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304,
CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46314,
CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-46328, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52920,
CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52951,
CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958,
CVE-2026-52961, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964,
CVE-2026-52967, CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970,
CVE-2026-52974, CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52981,
CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986,
CVE-2026-52989, CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993,
CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001,
CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006,
CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014,
CVE-2026-53015, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022,
CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034,
CVE-2026-53035, CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039,
CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045,
CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049,
CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53058,
CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062,
CVE-2026-53063, CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066,
CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072,
CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076,
CVE-2026-53077, CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084,
CVE-2026-53085, CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093,
CVE-2026-53094, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098,
CVE-2026-53110, CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53115,
CVE-2026-53117, CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53126,
CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53287,
CVE-2026-53289, CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294,
CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304,
CVE-2026-53306, CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53320,
CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375, CVE-2026-53376,
CVE-2026-53379, CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63843, CVE-2026-63844,
CVE-2026-63845, CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847, CVE-2026-63848,
CVE-2026-63851, CVE-2026-63852, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855,
CVE-2026-63856, CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862,
CVE-2026-63865, CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64034)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8607-1: Linux kernel (Azure CVM) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691497/unix-server/usn-8607-1-linux-kernel-azure-cvm-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691497/unix-server/usn-8607-1-linux-kernel-azure-cvm-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:17:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - ATM drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - RNBD block device driver;
  - Ublk userspace block driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - Clocksource drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - CPU idle management framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - CXL (Compute Express Link) drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Multifunction device drivers;
  - Broadcom VK accelerator driver;
  - Fastrpc Driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MOST (Media Oriented Systems Transport) drivers;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Ethernet team driver;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Performance monitor drivers;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - RapidIO drivers;
  - RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) subsystem;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - RPMSG subsystem;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - MediaTek SoC drivers;
  - Microchip PolarFire SoC system controller driver;
  - Texas Instruments SoC drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - ChipIdea USB driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - DesignWare USB3 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - USB over IP driver;
  - vDPA drivers;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Virtio Host (VHOST) subsystem;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM TDX Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FAT file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - JFS file system;
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Proc file system;
  - Pstore file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Memory Management;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Networking core;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Kernel kexec() syscall;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - RCU subsystem;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Scatterlist API;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - 9P file system network protocol;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - KCM (Kernel Connection Multiplexor) sockets driver;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - AppArmor security module;
  - Landlock security;
  - Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel framework;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - Samsung ASoC drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2025-21709, CVE-2025-22116, CVE-2025-38426, CVE-2025-39764,
CVE-2025-40005, CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40150, CVE-2025-68175,
CVE-2025-68239, CVE-2025-68334, CVE-2025-68736, CVE-2025-71152,
CVE-2025-71161, CVE-2025-71203, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71229,
CVE-2025-71231, CVE-2025-71232, CVE-2025-71233, CVE-2025-71235,
CVE-2025-71236, CVE-2025-71237, CVE-2025-71238, CVE-2025-71239,
CVE-2025-71265, CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2025-71269,
CVE-2025-71272, CVE-2025-71273, CVE-2025-71274, CVE-2025-71286,
CVE-2025-71287, CVE-2025-71288, CVE-2025-71291, CVE-2025-71292,
CVE-2025-71294, CVE-2025-71295, CVE-2025-71297, CVE-2025-71304,
CVE-2025-71305, CVE-2026-22981, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22993,
CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23104,
CVE-2026-23118, CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23157,
CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23171, CVE-2026-23220, CVE-2026-23221,
CVE-2026-23222, CVE-2026-23226, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23228,
CVE-2026-23229, CVE-2026-23230, CVE-2026-23233, CVE-2026-23234,
CVE-2026-23235, CVE-2026-23236, CVE-2026-23237, CVE-2026-23238,
CVE-2026-23241, CVE-2026-23242, CVE-2026-23243, CVE-2026-23244,
CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23246, CVE-2026-23249, CVE-2026-23253,
CVE-2026-23255, CVE-2026-23266, CVE-2026-23267, CVE-2026-23270,
CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23272, CVE-2026-23276, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23278, CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23284,
CVE-2026-23285, CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23289,
CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23292, CVE-2026-23293,
CVE-2026-23296, CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23302,
CVE-2026-23303, CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23306, CVE-2026-23307,
CVE-2026-23308, CVE-2026-23310, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23313,
CVE-2026-23315, CVE-2026-23317, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23319,
CVE-2026-23321, CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23325, CVE-2026-23330,
CVE-2026-23334, CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339,
CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23347, CVE-2026-23352,
CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23361,
CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23363, CVE-2026-23364, CVE-2026-23365,
CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23369, CVE-2026-23370,
CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23374, CVE-2026-23375, CVE-2026-23378,
CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23383,
CVE-2026-23386, CVE-2026-23387, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23389,
CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396,
CVE-2026-23397, CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401,
CVE-2026-23412, CVE-2026-23413, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23418,
CVE-2026-23419, CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23426, CVE-2026-23428,
CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23440,
CVE-2026-23441, CVE-2026-23442, CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446,
CVE-2026-23447, CVE-2026-23448, CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23450,
CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23455, CVE-2026-23456,
CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23461,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23464, CVE-2026-23465,
CVE-2026-23468, CVE-2026-23470, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475,
CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31392, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31394, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400,
CVE-2026-31402, CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407,
CVE-2026-31408, CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31411, CVE-2026-31412,
CVE-2026-31414, CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417,
CVE-2026-31418, CVE-2026-31421, CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423,
CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425, CVE-2026-31426, CVE-2026-31427,
CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31429, CVE-2026-31430, CVE-2026-31432,
CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31436, CVE-2026-31438, CVE-2026-31439,
CVE-2026-31440, CVE-2026-31441, CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447,
CVE-2026-31448, CVE-2026-31449, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31451,
CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31453, CVE-2026-31454, CVE-2026-31455,
CVE-2026-31458, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467,
CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31470, CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31474,
CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31477, CVE-2026-31478, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31482, CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31487,
CVE-2026-31488, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31492, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498,
CVE-2026-31499, CVE-2026-31500, CVE-2026-31502, CVE-2026-31503,
CVE-2026-31505, CVE-2026-31506, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508,
CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31511, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31516, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31519,
CVE-2026-31520, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523,
CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31525, CVE-2026-31527, CVE-2026-31528,
CVE-2026-31530, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31542,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31548, CVE-2026-31549,
CVE-2026-31550, CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31554,
CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31556, CVE-2026-31557, CVE-2026-31563,
CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31566, CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31575,
CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584,
CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588,
CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602,
CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31604, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606,
CVE-2026-31607, CVE-2026-31610, CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612,
CVE-2026-31613, CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617,
CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623,
CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627,
CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31637,
CVE-2026-31638, CVE-2026-31639, CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31645,
CVE-2026-31646, CVE-2026-31648, CVE-2026-31649, CVE-2026-31651,
CVE-2026-31655, CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31657, CVE-2026-31658,
CVE-2026-31659, CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662,
CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31668,
CVE-2026-31669, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672,
CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31675, CVE-2026-31677,
CVE-2026-31678, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31681,
CVE-2026-31682, CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31685,
CVE-2026-31686, CVE-2026-31687, CVE-2026-31689, CVE-2026-31693,
CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696, CVE-2026-31697,
CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700, CVE-2026-31701,
CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31704, CVE-2026-31705, CVE-2026-31706,
CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708, CVE-2026-31709, CVE-2026-31711,
CVE-2026-31712, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715, CVE-2026-31716,
CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31722, CVE-2026-31723,
CVE-2026-31724, CVE-2026-31725, CVE-2026-31726, CVE-2026-31728,
CVE-2026-31729, CVE-2026-31730, CVE-2026-31731, CVE-2026-31737,
CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31740, CVE-2026-31741, CVE-2026-31747,
CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752,
CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758,
CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763,
CVE-2026-31767, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-31770, CVE-2026-31772,
CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31779, CVE-2026-31780,
CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43007, CVE-2026-43011,
CVE-2026-43012, CVE-2026-43013, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015,
CVE-2026-43016, CVE-2026-43017, CVE-2026-43018, CVE-2026-43019,
CVE-2026-43020, CVE-2026-43023, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025,
CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030,
CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43036, CVE-2026-43037,
CVE-2026-43038, CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043,
CVE-2026-43044, CVE-2026-43046, CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43049,
CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054,
CVE-2026-43056, CVE-2026-43057, CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43059,
CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061, CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43064,
CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069,
CVE-2026-43071, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073, CVE-2026-43074,
CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079, CVE-2026-43080,
CVE-2026-43081, CVE-2026-43082, CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43086,
CVE-2026-43088, CVE-2026-43089, CVE-2026-43091, CVE-2026-43092,
CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43094, CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099,
CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104, CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43107,
CVE-2026-43109, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43112,
CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43114, CVE-2026-43117, CVE-2026-43119,
CVE-2026-43120, CVE-2026-43123, CVE-2026-43124, CVE-2026-43128,
CVE-2026-43129, CVE-2026-43130, CVE-2026-43132, CVE-2026-43133,
CVE-2026-43134, CVE-2026-43135, CVE-2026-43136, CVE-2026-43137,
CVE-2026-43139, CVE-2026-43140, CVE-2026-43141, CVE-2026-43143,
CVE-2026-43145, CVE-2026-43147, CVE-2026-43148, CVE-2026-43149,
CVE-2026-43150, CVE-2026-43152, CVE-2026-43153, CVE-2026-43156,
CVE-2026-43157, CVE-2026-43158, CVE-2026-43159, CVE-2026-43162,
CVE-2026-43163, CVE-2026-43167, CVE-2026-43168, CVE-2026-43169,
CVE-2026-43170, CVE-2026-43171, CVE-2026-43173, CVE-2026-43175,
CVE-2026-43180, CVE-2026-43182, CVE-2026-43183, CVE-2026-43184,
CVE-2026-43185, CVE-2026-43186, CVE-2026-43187, CVE-2026-43189,
CVE-2026-43190, CVE-2026-43194, CVE-2026-43196, CVE-2026-43199,
CVE-2026-43200, CVE-2026-43201, CVE-2026-43202, CVE-2026-43203,
CVE-2026-43205, CVE-2026-43206, CVE-2026-43207, CVE-2026-43209,
CVE-2026-43211, CVE-2026-43214, CVE-2026-43215, CVE-2026-43218,
CVE-2026-43221, CVE-2026-43222, CVE-2026-43223, CVE-2026-43225,
CVE-2026-43226, CVE-2026-43227, CVE-2026-43230, CVE-2026-43231,
CVE-2026-43232, CVE-2026-43233, CVE-2026-43236, CVE-2026-43238,
CVE-2026-43239, CVE-2026-43241, CVE-2026-43242, CVE-2026-43244,
CVE-2026-43245, CVE-2026-43246, CVE-2026-43248, CVE-2026-43249,
CVE-2026-43250, CVE-2026-43251, CVE-2026-43252, CVE-2026-43253,
CVE-2026-43255, CVE-2026-43256, CVE-2026-43257, CVE-2026-43261,
CVE-2026-43262, CVE-2026-43264, CVE-2026-43265, CVE-2026-43266,
CVE-2026-43268, CVE-2026-43269, CVE-2026-43270, CVE-2026-43271,
CVE-2026-43273, CVE-2026-43275, CVE-2026-43277, CVE-2026-43278,
CVE-2026-43279, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43283, CVE-2026-43287,
CVE-2026-43288, CVE-2026-43289, CVE-2026-43291, CVE-2026-43295,
CVE-2026-43296, CVE-2026-43297, CVE-2026-43300, CVE-2026-43302,
CVE-2026-43304, CVE-2026-43312, CVE-2026-43313, CVE-2026-43314,
CVE-2026-43315, CVE-2026-43316, CVE-2026-43317, CVE-2026-43318,
CVE-2026-43319, CVE-2026-43320, CVE-2026-43324, CVE-2026-43327,
CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43330, CVE-2026-43332,
CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43338,
CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43341, CVE-2026-43342,
CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43345, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43355,
CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43359, CVE-2026-43360, CVE-2026-43361,
CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43366, CVE-2026-43368,
CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43372, CVE-2026-43373, CVE-2026-43377,
CVE-2026-43378, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381, CVE-2026-43382,
CVE-2026-43383, CVE-2026-43384, CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387,
CVE-2026-43395, CVE-2026-43397, CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43406,
CVE-2026-43407, CVE-2026-43408, CVE-2026-43409, CVE-2026-43411,
CVE-2026-43412, CVE-2026-43413, CVE-2026-43414, CVE-2026-43415,
CVE-2026-43419, CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43421, CVE-2026-43424,
CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428,
CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43436,
CVE-2026-43437, CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43441, CVE-2026-43445,
CVE-2026-43448, CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451,
CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43455, CVE-2026-43456,
CVE-2026-43457, CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466,
CVE-2026-43467, CVE-2026-43468, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43471,
CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476,
CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43483, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43488,
CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43491, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43493,
CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43499,
CVE-2026-43501, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835,
CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840,
CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844,
CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45847, CVE-2026-45848,
CVE-2026-45849, CVE-2026-45851, CVE-2026-45852, CVE-2026-45855,
CVE-2026-45856, CVE-2026-45857, CVE-2026-45858, CVE-2026-45859,
CVE-2026-45860, CVE-2026-45861, CVE-2026-45862, CVE-2026-45864,
CVE-2026-45865, CVE-2026-45866, CVE-2026-45867, CVE-2026-45868,
CVE-2026-45869, CVE-2026-45870, CVE-2026-45871, CVE-2026-45872,
CVE-2026-45873, CVE-2026-45875, CVE-2026-45877, CVE-2026-45878,
CVE-2026-45879, CVE-2026-45880, CVE-2026-45881, CVE-2026-45882,
CVE-2026-45883, CVE-2026-45884, CVE-2026-45885, CVE-2026-45886,
CVE-2026-45890, CVE-2026-45891, CVE-2026-45893, CVE-2026-45895,
CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45902, CVE-2026-45904, CVE-2026-45905,
CVE-2026-45910, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45912, CVE-2026-45913,
CVE-2026-45914, CVE-2026-45915, CVE-2026-45916, CVE-2026-45917,
CVE-2026-45919, CVE-2026-45920, CVE-2026-45921, CVE-2026-45923,
CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45928, CVE-2026-45935, CVE-2026-45936,
CVE-2026-45938, CVE-2026-45941, CVE-2026-45942, CVE-2026-45943,
CVE-2026-45946, CVE-2026-45947, CVE-2026-45948, CVE-2026-45954,
CVE-2026-45956, CVE-2026-45957, CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45960,
CVE-2026-45962, CVE-2026-45964, CVE-2026-45965, CVE-2026-45968,
CVE-2026-45969, CVE-2026-45970, CVE-2026-45972, CVE-2026-45973,
CVE-2026-45974, CVE-2026-45976, CVE-2026-45978, CVE-2026-45981,
CVE-2026-45982, CVE-2026-45983, CVE-2026-45984, CVE-2026-45985,
CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45988, CVE-2026-45989,
CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-45996, CVE-2026-45997,
CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46003, CVE-2026-46004,
CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46007, CVE-2026-46009,
CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012, CVE-2026-46015, CVE-2026-46016,
CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46021, CVE-2026-46022,
CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46026, CVE-2026-46027,
CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46038,
CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041, CVE-2026-46043, CVE-2026-46044,
CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050,
CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46056,
CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46063,
CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46068, CVE-2026-46069,
CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073, CVE-2026-46075,
CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078, CVE-2026-46079,
CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083, CVE-2026-46084,
CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089, CVE-2026-46090,
CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46094, CVE-2026-46098,
CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46103,
CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46110,
CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113, CVE-2026-46114,
CVE-2026-46115, CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46119,
CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121, CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123,
CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125, CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127,
CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129, CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132,
CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46135, CVE-2026-46136, CVE-2026-46137,
CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139, CVE-2026-46142, CVE-2026-46143,
CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149,
CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46152, CVE-2026-46157,
CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160, CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163,
CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46169,
CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46176,
CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179, CVE-2026-46180,
CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46185, CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187,
CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46193,
CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46195, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197,
CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201,
CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46207,
CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212,
CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220,
CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46229,
CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233,
CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238,
CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46243, CVE-2026-46244, CVE-2026-46246,
CVE-2026-46247, CVE-2026-46249, CVE-2026-46250, CVE-2026-46251,
CVE-2026-46253, CVE-2026-46254, CVE-2026-46255, CVE-2026-46259,
CVE-2026-46260, CVE-2026-46261, CVE-2026-46265, CVE-2026-46266,
CVE-2026-46267, CVE-2026-46270, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274,
CVE-2026-46280, CVE-2026-46282, CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286,
CVE-2026-46287, CVE-2026-46289, CVE-2026-46291, CVE-2026-46292,
CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46296, CVE-2026-46299,
CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46306,
CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46314, CVE-2026-46319,
CVE-2026-46328, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52925,
CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52951, CVE-2026-52954,
CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52961,
CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964, CVE-2026-52967,
CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52974,
CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52981, CVE-2026-52982,
CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52989,
CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002,
CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011,
CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014, CVE-2026-53015,
CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023,
CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034, CVE-2026-53035,
CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040,
CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046,
CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050,
CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53058, CVE-2026-53059,
CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53063,
CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066, CVE-2026-53068,
CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073,
CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084, CVE-2026-53085,
CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53094,
CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098, CVE-2026-53110,
CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53117,
CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53126, CVE-2026-53128,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53289,
CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295,
CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53369,
CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375, CVE-2026-53376, CVE-2026-53379,
CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63843, CVE-2026-63844, CVE-2026-63845,
CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847, CVE-2026-63848, CVE-2026-63851,
CVE-2026-63852, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855, CVE-2026-63856,
CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862, CVE-2026-63865,
CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64034)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8608-1: Linux kernel (Azure FIPS) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691496/unix-server/usn-8608-1-linux-kernel-azure-fips-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691496/unix-server/usn-8608-1-linux-kernel-azure-fips-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:17:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - CXL (Compute Express Link) drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Fastrpc Driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Ethernet team driver;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Microchip PolarFire SoC system controller driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM TDX Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Memory Management;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Networking core;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - Landlock security;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - Samsung ASoC drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2025-21709, CVE-2025-22116, CVE-2025-38426, CVE-2025-39764,
CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40150, CVE-2025-68175, CVE-2025-68239,
CVE-2025-68334, CVE-2025-68736, CVE-2025-71152, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71203, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71269, CVE-2025-71287,
CVE-2025-71288, CVE-2026-22981, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22993,
CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23104, CVE-2026-23118,
CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23171,
CVE-2026-23207, CVE-2026-23226, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23244,
CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23246, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23255,
CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23276, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23285,
CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290,
CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23292, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296,
CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23302, CVE-2026-23303,
CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23306, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23308,
CVE-2026-23310, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23313, CVE-2026-23315,
CVE-2026-23317, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321,
CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23325, CVE-2026-23330, CVE-2026-23334,
CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340,
CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23347, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356,
CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23360, CVE-2026-23361,
CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23363, CVE-2026-23364, CVE-2026-23365,
CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23369, CVE-2026-23370,
CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23374, CVE-2026-23375, CVE-2026-23378,
CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23383,
CVE-2026-23386, CVE-2026-23387, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23389,
CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397,
CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23412,
CVE-2026-23413, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23418, CVE-2026-23419,
CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23426, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438,
CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23440, CVE-2026-23441, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23447, CVE-2026-23448,
CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23456,
CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23461,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23464, CVE-2026-23465,
CVE-2026-23468, CVE-2026-23470, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475,
CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31392, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31394, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400,
CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408,
CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31412, CVE-2026-31413, CVE-2026-31414,
CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31426, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31429,
CVE-2026-31430, CVE-2026-31432, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31434,
CVE-2026-31438, CVE-2026-31439, CVE-2026-31440, CVE-2026-31441,
CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31449, CVE-2026-31450,
CVE-2026-31451, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31453, CVE-2026-31454,
CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31458, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466,
CVE-2026-31467, CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31470, CVE-2026-31473,
CVE-2026-31474, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31477, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31482, CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31487,
CVE-2026-31488, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31492, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498,
CVE-2026-31499, CVE-2026-31500, CVE-2026-31502, CVE-2026-31503,
CVE-2026-31505, CVE-2026-31506, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508,
CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31511, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31516, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31519,
CVE-2026-31520, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523,
CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31525, CVE-2026-31527, CVE-2026-31528,
CVE-2026-31530, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31542,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31548, CVE-2026-31549,
CVE-2026-31550, CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31554,
CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31556, CVE-2026-31557, CVE-2026-31563,
CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31566, CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31575,
CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584,
CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588,
CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602,
CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31604, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606,
CVE-2026-31610, CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612, CVE-2026-31613,
CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618,
CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624,
CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628,
CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31638, CVE-2026-31639,
CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31645, CVE-2026-31646, CVE-2026-31648,
CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31655, CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31658,
CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664,
CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671,
CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31675,
CVE-2026-31677, CVE-2026-31678, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680,
CVE-2026-31681, CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686,
CVE-2026-31689, CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696,
CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700,
CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31704, CVE-2026-31705,
CVE-2026-31706, CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708, CVE-2026-31709,
CVE-2026-31711, CVE-2026-31712, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715,
CVE-2026-31716, CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31722,
CVE-2026-31723, CVE-2026-31724, CVE-2026-31725, CVE-2026-31726,
CVE-2026-31728, CVE-2026-31729, CVE-2026-31730, CVE-2026-31731,
CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31740, CVE-2026-31741,
CVE-2026-31747, CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751,
CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756,
CVE-2026-31758, CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762,
CVE-2026-31763, CVE-2026-31767, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-31770,
CVE-2026-31772, CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31779,
CVE-2026-31780, CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43007,
CVE-2026-43012, CVE-2026-43013, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015,
CVE-2026-43016, CVE-2026-43017, CVE-2026-43018, CVE-2026-43019,
CVE-2026-43020, CVE-2026-43023, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025,
CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030,
CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43036, CVE-2026-43040,
CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43044, CVE-2026-43046,
CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43049, CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051,
CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43056, CVE-2026-43057,
CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43059, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061,
CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43064, CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066,
CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073,
CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079,
CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43081, CVE-2026-43082, CVE-2026-43084,
CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43086, CVE-2026-43088, CVE-2026-43089,
CVE-2026-43091, CVE-2026-43092, CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43094,
CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104,
CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43107, CVE-2026-43109, CVE-2026-43110,
CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43119,
CVE-2026-43120, CVE-2026-43129, CVE-2026-43162, CVE-2026-43245,
CVE-2026-43252, CVE-2026-43265, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43324,
CVE-2026-43327, CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43330,
CVE-2026-43332, CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336,
CVE-2026-43338, CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342,
CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43345, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43355,
CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43359, CVE-2026-43360, CVE-2026-43361,
CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43366, CVE-2026-43368,
CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43371, CVE-2026-43372, CVE-2026-43373,
CVE-2026-43377, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381, CVE-2026-43382,
CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43395, CVE-2026-43397,
CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43408, CVE-2026-43409, CVE-2026-43411,
CVE-2026-43412, CVE-2026-43413, CVE-2026-43415, CVE-2026-43419,
CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43421, CVE-2026-43424, CVE-2026-43425,
CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428, CVE-2026-43429,
CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43436, CVE-2026-43437,
CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43441, CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43448,
CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451, CVE-2026-43452,
CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43455, CVE-2026-43456, CVE-2026-43457,
CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43467,
CVE-2026-43468, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43471, CVE-2026-43472,
CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476, CVE-2026-43480,
CVE-2026-43483, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43488, CVE-2026-43490,
CVE-2026-43491, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496,
CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43499, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839,
CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843,
CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45855,
CVE-2026-45858, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45920,
CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45942, CVE-2026-45943, CVE-2026-45956,
CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987,
CVE-2026-45989, CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-45996,
CVE-2026-45997, CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46003,
CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46007,
CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012, CVE-2026-46015,
CVE-2026-46016, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46021,
CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46026,
CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037,
CVE-2026-46038, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041, CVE-2026-46044,
CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050,
CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46056,
CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46063,
CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46068, CVE-2026-46069,
CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073, CVE-2026-46075,
CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078, CVE-2026-46079,
CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083, CVE-2026-46084,
CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089, CVE-2026-46090,
CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46094, CVE-2026-46098,
CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46103,
CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46110,
CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113, CVE-2026-46114,
CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125,
CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129,
CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46136,
CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139, CVE-2026-46142,
CVE-2026-46143, CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146,
CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46152,
CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160, CVE-2026-46161,
CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174,
CVE-2026-46176, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179,
CVE-2026-46180, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187,
CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46193,
CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201, CVE-2026-46204,
CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46207, CVE-2026-46208,
CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46214,
CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46225,
CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46229, CVE-2026-46230,
CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234,
CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46241,
CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46280, CVE-2026-46282,
CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286, CVE-2026-46287, CVE-2026-46291,
CVE-2026-46292, CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46296,
CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304,
CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46314,
CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52925,
CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52951, CVE-2026-52954,
CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52961,
CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964, CVE-2026-52967,
CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52974,
CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52981, CVE-2026-52982,
CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52989,
CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002,
CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011,
CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014, CVE-2026-53015,
CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023,
CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034, CVE-2026-53035,
CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040,
CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046,
CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050,
CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53058, CVE-2026-53059,
CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53063,
CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066, CVE-2026-53068,
CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073,
CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084, CVE-2026-53085,
CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53094,
CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098, CVE-2026-53110,
CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53117,
CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53126, CVE-2026-53128,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53289,
CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295,
CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53369,
CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375, CVE-2026-53376, CVE-2026-53379,
CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63843, CVE-2026-63844, CVE-2026-63845,
CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847, CVE-2026-63848, CVE-2026-63851,
CVE-2026-63852, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855, CVE-2026-63856,
CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862, CVE-2026-63865,
CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64034, CVE-2026-64164)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8609-1: Linux kernel (Azure CVM) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691495/unix-server/usn-8609-1-linux-kernel-azure-cvm-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691495/unix-server/usn-8609-1-linux-kernel-azure-cvm-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:17:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - ATM drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - RNBD block device driver;
  - Ublk userspace block driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - Clocksource drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - CPU idle management framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - CXL (Compute Express Link) drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Multifunction device drivers;
  - Broadcom VK accelerator driver;
  - Fastrpc Driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MOST (Media Oriented Systems Transport) drivers;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Ethernet team driver;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Performance monitor drivers;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - RapidIO drivers;
  - RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) subsystem;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - RPMSG subsystem;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - MediaTek SoC drivers;
  - Microchip PolarFire SoC system controller driver;
  - Texas Instruments SoC drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - ChipIdea USB driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - DesignWare USB3 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - USB over IP driver;
  - vDPA drivers;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Virtio Host (VHOST) subsystem;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM TDX Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FAT file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - JFS file system;
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Proc file system;
  - Pstore file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Memory Management;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Networking core;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Kernel kexec() syscall;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - RCU subsystem;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Scatterlist API;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - 9P file system network protocol;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - KCM (Kernel Connection Multiplexor) sockets driver;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - AppArmor security module;
  - Landlock security;
  - Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel framework;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - Samsung ASoC drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2025-21709, CVE-2025-22116, CVE-2025-38426, CVE-2025-39764,
CVE-2025-40005, CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40150, CVE-2025-68175,
CVE-2025-68239, CVE-2025-68334, CVE-2025-68736, CVE-2025-71152,
CVE-2025-71161, CVE-2025-71203, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71229,
CVE-2025-71231, CVE-2025-71232, CVE-2025-71233, CVE-2025-71235,
CVE-2025-71236, CVE-2025-71237, CVE-2025-71238, CVE-2025-71239,
CVE-2025-71265, CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2025-71269,
CVE-2025-71272, CVE-2025-71273, CVE-2025-71274, CVE-2025-71286,
CVE-2025-71287, CVE-2025-71288, CVE-2025-71291, CVE-2025-71292,
CVE-2025-71294, CVE-2025-71295, CVE-2025-71297, CVE-2025-71304,
CVE-2025-71305, CVE-2026-22981, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22993,
CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23104,
CVE-2026-23118, CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23157,
CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23171, CVE-2026-23220, CVE-2026-23221,
CVE-2026-23222, CVE-2026-23226, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23228,
CVE-2026-23229, CVE-2026-23230, CVE-2026-23233, CVE-2026-23234,
CVE-2026-23235, CVE-2026-23236, CVE-2026-23237, CVE-2026-23238,
CVE-2026-23241, CVE-2026-23242, CVE-2026-23243, CVE-2026-23244,
CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23246, CVE-2026-23249, CVE-2026-23253,
CVE-2026-23255, CVE-2026-23266, CVE-2026-23267, CVE-2026-23270,
CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23272, CVE-2026-23276, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23278, CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23284,
CVE-2026-23285, CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23289,
CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23292, CVE-2026-23293,
CVE-2026-23296, CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23302,
CVE-2026-23303, CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23306, CVE-2026-23307,
CVE-2026-23308, CVE-2026-23310, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23313,
CVE-2026-23315, CVE-2026-23317, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23319,
CVE-2026-23321, CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23325, CVE-2026-23330,
CVE-2026-23334, CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339,
CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23347, CVE-2026-23352,
CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23361,
CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23363, CVE-2026-23364, CVE-2026-23365,
CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23369, CVE-2026-23370,
CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23374, CVE-2026-23375, CVE-2026-23378,
CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23383,
CVE-2026-23386, CVE-2026-23387, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23389,
CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396,
CVE-2026-23397, CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401,
CVE-2026-23412, CVE-2026-23413, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23418,
CVE-2026-23419, CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23426, CVE-2026-23428,
CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23440,
CVE-2026-23441, CVE-2026-23442, CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446,
CVE-2026-23447, CVE-2026-23448, CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23450,
CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23455, CVE-2026-23456,
CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23461,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23464, CVE-2026-23465,
CVE-2026-23468, CVE-2026-23470, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475,
CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31392, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31394, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400,
CVE-2026-31402, CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407,
CVE-2026-31408, CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31411, CVE-2026-31412,
CVE-2026-31414, CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417,
CVE-2026-31418, CVE-2026-31421, CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423,
CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425, CVE-2026-31426, CVE-2026-31427,
CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31429, CVE-2026-31430, CVE-2026-31432,
CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31436, CVE-2026-31438, CVE-2026-31439,
CVE-2026-31440, CVE-2026-31441, CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447,
CVE-2026-31448, CVE-2026-31449, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31451,
CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31453, CVE-2026-31454, CVE-2026-31455,
CVE-2026-31458, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467,
CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31470, CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31474,
CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31477, CVE-2026-31478, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31482, CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31487,
CVE-2026-31488, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31492, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498,
CVE-2026-31499, CVE-2026-31500, CVE-2026-31502, CVE-2026-31503,
CVE-2026-31505, CVE-2026-31506, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508,
CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31511, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31516, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31519,
CVE-2026-31520, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523,
CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31525, CVE-2026-31527, CVE-2026-31528,
CVE-2026-31530, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31542,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31548, CVE-2026-31549,
CVE-2026-31550, CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31554,
CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31556, CVE-2026-31557, CVE-2026-31563,
CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31566, CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31575,
CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584,
CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588,
CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602,
CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31604, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606,
CVE-2026-31607, CVE-2026-31610, CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612,
CVE-2026-31613, CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617,
CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623,
CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627,
CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31637,
CVE-2026-31638, CVE-2026-31639, CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31645,
CVE-2026-31646, CVE-2026-31648, CVE-2026-31649, CVE-2026-31651,
CVE-2026-31655, CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31657, CVE-2026-31658,
CVE-2026-31659, CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662,
CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31668,
CVE-2026-31669, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672,
CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31675, CVE-2026-31677,
CVE-2026-31678, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31681,
CVE-2026-31682, CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31685,
CVE-2026-31686, CVE-2026-31687, CVE-2026-31689, CVE-2026-31693,
CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696, CVE-2026-31697,
CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700, CVE-2026-31701,
CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31704, CVE-2026-31705, CVE-2026-31706,
CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708, CVE-2026-31709, CVE-2026-31711,
CVE-2026-31712, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715, CVE-2026-31716,
CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31722, CVE-2026-31723,
CVE-2026-31724, CVE-2026-31725, CVE-2026-31726, CVE-2026-31728,
CVE-2026-31729, CVE-2026-31730, CVE-2026-31731, CVE-2026-31737,
CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31740, CVE-2026-31741, CVE-2026-31747,
CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752,
CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758,
CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763,
CVE-2026-31767, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-31770, CVE-2026-31772,
CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31779, CVE-2026-31780,
CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43007, CVE-2026-43011,
CVE-2026-43012, CVE-2026-43013, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015,
CVE-2026-43016, CVE-2026-43017, CVE-2026-43018, CVE-2026-43019,
CVE-2026-43020, CVE-2026-43023, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025,
CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030,
CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43036, CVE-2026-43037,
CVE-2026-43038, CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043,
CVE-2026-43044, CVE-2026-43046, CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43049,
CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054,
CVE-2026-43056, CVE-2026-43057, CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43059,
CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061, CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43064,
CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069,
CVE-2026-43071, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073, CVE-2026-43074,
CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079, CVE-2026-43080,
CVE-2026-43081, CVE-2026-43082, CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43086,
CVE-2026-43088, CVE-2026-43089, CVE-2026-43091, CVE-2026-43092,
CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43094, CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099,
CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104, CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43107,
CVE-2026-43109, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43112,
CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43114, CVE-2026-43117, CVE-2026-43119,
CVE-2026-43120, CVE-2026-43123, CVE-2026-43124, CVE-2026-43128,
CVE-2026-43129, CVE-2026-43130, CVE-2026-43132, CVE-2026-43133,
CVE-2026-43134, CVE-2026-43135, CVE-2026-43136, CVE-2026-43137,
CVE-2026-43139, CVE-2026-43140, CVE-2026-43141, CVE-2026-43143,
CVE-2026-43145, CVE-2026-43147, CVE-2026-43148, CVE-2026-43149,
CVE-2026-43150, CVE-2026-43152, CVE-2026-43153, CVE-2026-43156,
CVE-2026-43157, CVE-2026-43158, CVE-2026-43159, CVE-2026-43162,
CVE-2026-43163, CVE-2026-43167, CVE-2026-43168, CVE-2026-43169,
CVE-2026-43170, CVE-2026-43171, CVE-2026-43173, CVE-2026-43175,
CVE-2026-43180, CVE-2026-43182, CVE-2026-43183, CVE-2026-43184,
CVE-2026-43185, CVE-2026-43186, CVE-2026-43187, CVE-2026-43189,
CVE-2026-43190, CVE-2026-43194, CVE-2026-43196, CVE-2026-43199,
CVE-2026-43200, CVE-2026-43201, CVE-2026-43202, CVE-2026-43203,
CVE-2026-43205, CVE-2026-43206, CVE-2026-43207, CVE-2026-43209,
CVE-2026-43211, CVE-2026-43214, CVE-2026-43215, CVE-2026-43218,
CVE-2026-43221, CVE-2026-43222, CVE-2026-43223, CVE-2026-43225,
CVE-2026-43226, CVE-2026-43227, CVE-2026-43230, CVE-2026-43231,
CVE-2026-43232, CVE-2026-43233, CVE-2026-43236, CVE-2026-43238,
CVE-2026-43239, CVE-2026-43241, CVE-2026-43242, CVE-2026-43244,
CVE-2026-43245, CVE-2026-43246, CVE-2026-43248, CVE-2026-43249,
CVE-2026-43250, CVE-2026-43251, CVE-2026-43252, CVE-2026-43253,
CVE-2026-43255, CVE-2026-43256, CVE-2026-43257, CVE-2026-43261,
CVE-2026-43262, CVE-2026-43264, CVE-2026-43265, CVE-2026-43266,
CVE-2026-43268, CVE-2026-43269, CVE-2026-43270, CVE-2026-43271,
CVE-2026-43273, CVE-2026-43275, CVE-2026-43277, CVE-2026-43278,
CVE-2026-43279, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43283, CVE-2026-43287,
CVE-2026-43288, CVE-2026-43289, CVE-2026-43291, CVE-2026-43295,
CVE-2026-43296, CVE-2026-43297, CVE-2026-43300, CVE-2026-43302,
CVE-2026-43304, CVE-2026-43312, CVE-2026-43313, CVE-2026-43314,
CVE-2026-43315, CVE-2026-43316, CVE-2026-43317, CVE-2026-43318,
CVE-2026-43319, CVE-2026-43320, CVE-2026-43324, CVE-2026-43327,
CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43330, CVE-2026-43332,
CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43338,
CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43341, CVE-2026-43342,
CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43345, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43355,
CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43359, CVE-2026-43360, CVE-2026-43361,
CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43366, CVE-2026-43368,
CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43372, CVE-2026-43373, CVE-2026-43377,
CVE-2026-43378, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381, CVE-2026-43382,
CVE-2026-43383, CVE-2026-43384, CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387,
CVE-2026-43395, CVE-2026-43397, CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43406,
CVE-2026-43407, CVE-2026-43408, CVE-2026-43409, CVE-2026-43411,
CVE-2026-43412, CVE-2026-43413, CVE-2026-43414, CVE-2026-43415,
CVE-2026-43419, CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43421, CVE-2026-43424,
CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428,
CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43436,
CVE-2026-43437, CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43441, CVE-2026-43445,
CVE-2026-43448, CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451,
CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43455, CVE-2026-43456,
CVE-2026-43457, CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466,
CVE-2026-43467, CVE-2026-43468, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43471,
CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476,
CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43483, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43488,
CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43491, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43493,
CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43499,
CVE-2026-43501, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835,
CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840,
CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844,
CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45847, CVE-2026-45848,
CVE-2026-45849, CVE-2026-45851, CVE-2026-45852, CVE-2026-45855,
CVE-2026-45856, CVE-2026-45857, CVE-2026-45858, CVE-2026-45859,
CVE-2026-45860, CVE-2026-45861, CVE-2026-45862, CVE-2026-45864,
CVE-2026-45865, CVE-2026-45866, CVE-2026-45867, CVE-2026-45868,
CVE-2026-45869, CVE-2026-45870, CVE-2026-45871, CVE-2026-45872,
CVE-2026-45873, CVE-2026-45875, CVE-2026-45877, CVE-2026-45878,
CVE-2026-45879, CVE-2026-45880, CVE-2026-45881, CVE-2026-45882,
CVE-2026-45883, CVE-2026-45884, CVE-2026-45885, CVE-2026-45886,
CVE-2026-45890, CVE-2026-45891, CVE-2026-45893, CVE-2026-45895,
CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45902, CVE-2026-45904, CVE-2026-45905,
CVE-2026-45910, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45912, CVE-2026-45913,
CVE-2026-45914, CVE-2026-45915, CVE-2026-45916, CVE-2026-45917,
CVE-2026-45919, CVE-2026-45920, CVE-2026-45921, CVE-2026-45923,
CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45928, CVE-2026-45935, CVE-2026-45936,
CVE-2026-45938, CVE-2026-45941, CVE-2026-45942, CVE-2026-45943,
CVE-2026-45946, CVE-2026-45947, CVE-2026-45948, CVE-2026-45954,
CVE-2026-45956, CVE-2026-45957, CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45960,
CVE-2026-45962, CVE-2026-45964, CVE-2026-45965, CVE-2026-45968,
CVE-2026-45969, CVE-2026-45970, CVE-2026-45972, CVE-2026-45973,
CVE-2026-45974, CVE-2026-45976, CVE-2026-45978, CVE-2026-45981,
CVE-2026-45982, CVE-2026-45983, CVE-2026-45984, CVE-2026-45985,
CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45988, CVE-2026-45989,
CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-45996, CVE-2026-45997,
CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46003, CVE-2026-46004,
CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46007, CVE-2026-46009,
CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012, CVE-2026-46015, CVE-2026-46016,
CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46021, CVE-2026-46022,
CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46026, CVE-2026-46027,
CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46038,
CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041, CVE-2026-46043, CVE-2026-46044,
CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050,
CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46056,
CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46063,
CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46068, CVE-2026-46069,
CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073, CVE-2026-46075,
CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078, CVE-2026-46079,
CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083, CVE-2026-46084,
CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089, CVE-2026-46090,
CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46094, CVE-2026-46098,
CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46103,
CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46110,
CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113, CVE-2026-46114,
CVE-2026-46115, CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46119,
CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121, CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123,
CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125, CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127,
CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129, CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132,
CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46135, CVE-2026-46136, CVE-2026-46137,
CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139, CVE-2026-46142, CVE-2026-46143,
CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149,
CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46152, CVE-2026-46157,
CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160, CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163,
CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46169,
CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46176,
CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179, CVE-2026-46180,
CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46185, CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187,
CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46193,
CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46195, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197,
CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201,
CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46207,
CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212,
CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220,
CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46229,
CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233,
CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238,
CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46243, CVE-2026-46244, CVE-2026-46246,
CVE-2026-46247, CVE-2026-46249, CVE-2026-46250, CVE-2026-46251,
CVE-2026-46253, CVE-2026-46254, CVE-2026-46255, CVE-2026-46259,
CVE-2026-46260, CVE-2026-46261, CVE-2026-46265, CVE-2026-46266,
CVE-2026-46267, CVE-2026-46270, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274,
CVE-2026-46280, CVE-2026-46282, CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286,
CVE-2026-46287, CVE-2026-46289, CVE-2026-46291, CVE-2026-46292,
CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46296, CVE-2026-46299,
CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46306,
CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46314, CVE-2026-46319,
CVE-2026-46328, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52925,
CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52951, CVE-2026-52954,
CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52961,
CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964, CVE-2026-52967,
CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52974,
CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52981, CVE-2026-52982,
CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52989,
CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002,
CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011,
CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014, CVE-2026-53015,
CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023,
CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034, CVE-2026-53035,
CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040,
CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046,
CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050,
CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53058, CVE-2026-53059,
CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53063,
CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066, CVE-2026-53068,
CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073,
CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084, CVE-2026-53085,
CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53094,
CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098, CVE-2026-53110,
CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53117,
CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53126, CVE-2026-53128,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53289,
CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295,
CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53369,
CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375, CVE-2026-53376, CVE-2026-53379,
CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63843, CVE-2026-63844, CVE-2026-63845,
CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847, CVE-2026-63848, CVE-2026-63851,
CVE-2026-63852, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855, CVE-2026-63856,
CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862, CVE-2026-63865,
CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64034, CVE-2026-64164)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8575-3: Linux kernel vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691494/unix-server/usn-8575-3-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691494/unix-server/usn-8575-3-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:17:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose sensitive information (kernel memory). (CVE-2023-45896)

It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM32 architecture;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - ATM drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - RNBD block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clocksource drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - CPU idle management framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - Arm Firmware Framework for ARMv8-A(FFA);
  - EFI core;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Multifunction device drivers;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - RapidIO drivers;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - RPMSG subsystem;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Texas Instruments SoC drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FAT file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - JFS file system;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Proc file system;
  - Pstore file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) subsystem;
  - Memory Management;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Kernel kexec() syscall;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Networking core;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - AppArmor security module;
  - Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel framework;
  - ALSA framework;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - AudioScience HPI driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
(CVE-2022-49803, CVE-2022-49961, CVE-2022-50073, CVE-2022-50116,
CVE-2022-50552, CVE-2023-52682, CVE-2023-52737, CVE-2023-53545,
CVE-2023-53596, CVE-2023-53629, CVE-2024-27389, CVE-2024-35865,
CVE-2024-36898, CVE-2024-36922, CVE-2024-41079, CVE-2024-46715,
CVE-2024-46770, CVE-2024-47809, CVE-2024-50012, CVE-2024-53221,
CVE-2024-56557, CVE-2024-56584, CVE-2024-56657, CVE-2024-56719,
CVE-2024-56727, CVE-2025-21712, CVE-2025-21739, CVE-2025-21863,
CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-23141, CVE-2025-37786, CVE-2025-38006,
CVE-2025-38105, CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38250, CVE-2025-38562,
CVE-2025-38626, CVE-2025-38659, CVE-2025-38710, CVE-2025-39748,
CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-40005, CVE-2025-40016, CVE-2025-40103,
CVE-2025-40323, CVE-2025-68206, CVE-2025-68239, CVE-2025-68256,
CVE-2025-68307, CVE-2025-68358, CVE-2025-71150, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71232, CVE-2025-71233, CVE-2025-71235,
CVE-2025-71236, CVE-2025-71237, CVE-2025-71238, CVE-2025-71239,
CVE-2025-71265, CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2025-71274,
CVE-2025-71287, CVE-2025-71292, CVE-2025-71304, CVE-2026-23031,
CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23141,
CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23204, CVE-2026-23220,
CVE-2026-23221, CVE-2026-23222, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23228,
CVE-2026-23229, CVE-2026-23234, CVE-2026-23235, CVE-2026-23236,
CVE-2026-23237, CVE-2026-23238, CVE-2026-23241, CVE-2026-23242,
CVE-2026-23243, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23266, CVE-2026-23270,
CVE-2026-23277, CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23286,
CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23293,
CVE-2026-23296, CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23303,
CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23318,
CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339,
CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357,
CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23367,
CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23379,
CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23391,
CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397,
CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23420,
CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454,
CVE-2026-23456, CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400, CVE-2026-31405,
CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408, CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31411,
CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31446,
CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31454,
CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467,
CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498, CVE-2026-31507,
CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522,
CVE-2026-31523, CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550,
CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31565,
CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578,
CVE-2026-31580, CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31585,
CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594,
CVE-2026-31596, CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599,
CVE-2026-31602, CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31615,
CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619,
CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625,
CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629,
CVE-2026-31630, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31651,
CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661,
CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667,
CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673,
CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31676, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680,
CVE-2026-31681, CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686,
CVE-2026-31687, CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696,
CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31701,
CVE-2026-31716, CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31726,
CVE-2026-31728, CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31747,
CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752,
CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758,
CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763,
CVE-2026-31770, CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31780,
CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015,
CVE-2026-43020, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027,
CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035,
CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43046,
CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052,
CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061,
CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068,
CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076,
CVE-2026-43079, CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43089,
CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103,
CVE-2026-43104, CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111,
CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43123, CVE-2026-43124,
CVE-2026-43130, CVE-2026-43132, CVE-2026-43133, CVE-2026-43134,
CVE-2026-43135, CVE-2026-43136, CVE-2026-43139, CVE-2026-43140,
CVE-2026-43141, CVE-2026-43145, CVE-2026-43147, CVE-2026-43148,
CVE-2026-43149, CVE-2026-43152, CVE-2026-43156, CVE-2026-43158,
CVE-2026-43159, CVE-2026-43163, CVE-2026-43168, CVE-2026-43171,
CVE-2026-43180, CVE-2026-43182, CVE-2026-43183, CVE-2026-43184,
CVE-2026-43187, CVE-2026-43190, CVE-2026-43194, CVE-2026-43196,
CVE-2026-43200, CVE-2026-43202, CVE-2026-43203, CVE-2026-43205,
CVE-2026-43206, CVE-2026-43207, CVE-2026-43209, CVE-2026-43211,
CVE-2026-43218, CVE-2026-43223, CVE-2026-43225, CVE-2026-43226,
CVE-2026-43227, CVE-2026-43230, CVE-2026-43231, CVE-2026-43232,
CVE-2026-43233, CVE-2026-43236, CVE-2026-43241, CVE-2026-43242,
CVE-2026-43246, CVE-2026-43251, CVE-2026-43255, CVE-2026-43257,
CVE-2026-43261, CVE-2026-43262, CVE-2026-43264, CVE-2026-43266,
CVE-2026-43268, CVE-2026-43269, CVE-2026-43270, CVE-2026-43273,
CVE-2026-43275, CVE-2026-43277, CVE-2026-43279, CVE-2026-43281,
CVE-2026-43283, CVE-2026-43287, CVE-2026-43289, CVE-2026-43291,
CVE-2026-43295, CVE-2026-43296, CVE-2026-43302, CVE-2026-43312,
CVE-2026-43313, CVE-2026-43314, CVE-2026-43315, CVE-2026-43316,
CVE-2026-43324, CVE-2026-43327, CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329,
CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43339,
CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342, CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43357,
CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43373,
CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381, CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43386,
CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43420,
CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428,
CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43439,
CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451,
CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459,
CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473,
CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476, CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43484,
CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839,
CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843,
CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45847, CVE-2026-45848,
CVE-2026-45852, CVE-2026-45856, CVE-2026-45857, CVE-2026-45860,
CVE-2026-45862, CVE-2026-45864, CVE-2026-45866, CVE-2026-45867,
CVE-2026-45868, CVE-2026-45869, CVE-2026-45870, CVE-2026-45871,
CVE-2026-45873, CVE-2026-45875, CVE-2026-45879, CVE-2026-45883,
CVE-2026-45885, CVE-2026-45890, CVE-2026-45891, CVE-2026-45899,
CVE-2026-45902, CVE-2026-45904, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45912,
CVE-2026-45915, CVE-2026-45916, CVE-2026-45919, CVE-2026-45920,
CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45935, CVE-2026-45936, CVE-2026-45941,
CVE-2026-45946, CVE-2026-45948, CVE-2026-45954, CVE-2026-45956,
CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45960, CVE-2026-45964, CVE-2026-45965,
CVE-2026-45968, CVE-2026-45969, CVE-2026-45970, CVE-2026-45974,
CVE-2026-45978, CVE-2026-45983, CVE-2026-45984, CVE-2026-45985,
CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-46002,
CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46015,
CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023,
CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037,
CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46044, CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047,
CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050, CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46053,
CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072,
CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46088,
CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102,
CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46120,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46127,
CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46137,
CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151,
CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178,
CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189,
CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206,
CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46219,
CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231,
CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238,
CVE-2026-46249, CVE-2026-46250, CVE-2026-46253, CVE-2026-46259,
CVE-2026-46267, CVE-2026-46270, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274,
CVE-2026-46275, CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46301,
CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46319,
CVE-2026-46328, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52914,
CVE-2026-52915, CVE-2026-52916, CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920,
CVE-2026-52921, CVE-2026-52922, CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52926,
CVE-2026-52931, CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957,
CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52969,
CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985,
CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002,
CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011,
CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022,
CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040,
CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046,
CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050,
CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062,
CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069,
CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074,
CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53077, CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53088,
CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53128,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53294,
CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53379,
CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63865, CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64032,
CVE-2026-64033, CVE-2026-64034, CVE-2026-64039, CVE-2026-64046,
CVE-2026-64047, CVE-2026-64055, CVE-2026-64056, CVE-2026-64083,
CVE-2026-64084, CVE-2026-64085, CVE-2026-64086, CVE-2026-64087,
CVE-2026-64088, CVE-2026-64089, CVE-2026-64096, CVE-2026-64102,
CVE-2026-64103, CVE-2026-64113, CVE-2026-64114, CVE-2026-64115,
CVE-2026-64125, CVE-2026-64133, CVE-2026-64135, CVE-2026-64153,
CVE-2026-64155, CVE-2026-64164, CVE-2026-64165, CVE-2026-64166,
CVE-2026-64168, CVE-2026-64173, CVE-2026-64174, CVE-2026-64177,
CVE-2026-64178, CVE-2026-64179, CVE-2026-64185)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8610-1: Linux kernel (Azure CVM) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691493/unix-server/usn-8610-1-linux-kernel-azure-cvm-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691493/unix-server/usn-8610-1-linux-kernel-azure-cvm-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:17:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose sensitive information (kernel memory). (CVE-2023-45896)

It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM32 architecture;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - ATM drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - RNBD block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clocksource drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - CPU idle management framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - Arm Firmware Framework for ARMv8-A(FFA);
  - EFI core;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Multifunction device drivers;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - RapidIO drivers;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - RPMSG subsystem;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Texas Instruments SoC drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FAT file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - JFS file system;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Proc file system;
  - Pstore file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) subsystem;
  - Memory Management;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Kernel kexec() syscall;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Networking core;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - AppArmor security module;
  - Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel framework;
  - ALSA framework;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - AudioScience HPI driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
(CVE-2022-49803, CVE-2022-49961, CVE-2022-50073, CVE-2022-50116,
CVE-2022-50552, CVE-2023-52682, CVE-2023-52737, CVE-2023-53545,
CVE-2023-53596, CVE-2023-53629, CVE-2024-27389, CVE-2024-35865,
CVE-2024-36898, CVE-2024-36922, CVE-2024-41079, CVE-2024-46715,
CVE-2024-46770, CVE-2024-47809, CVE-2024-50012, CVE-2024-53221,
CVE-2024-56557, CVE-2024-56584, CVE-2024-56657, CVE-2024-56719,
CVE-2024-56727, CVE-2025-21712, CVE-2025-21739, CVE-2025-21863,
CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-23141, CVE-2025-37786, CVE-2025-38006,
CVE-2025-38105, CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38250, CVE-2025-38562,
CVE-2025-38626, CVE-2025-38659, CVE-2025-38710, CVE-2025-39748,
CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-40005, CVE-2025-40016, CVE-2025-40103,
CVE-2025-40323, CVE-2025-68206, CVE-2025-68239, CVE-2025-68256,
CVE-2025-68307, CVE-2025-68358, CVE-2025-71150, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71232, CVE-2025-71233, CVE-2025-71235,
CVE-2025-71236, CVE-2025-71237, CVE-2025-71238, CVE-2025-71239,
CVE-2025-71265, CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2025-71274,
CVE-2025-71287, CVE-2025-71292, CVE-2025-71304, CVE-2026-23031,
CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23141,
CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23204, CVE-2026-23220,
CVE-2026-23221, CVE-2026-23222, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23228,
CVE-2026-23229, CVE-2026-23234, CVE-2026-23235, CVE-2026-23236,
CVE-2026-23237, CVE-2026-23238, CVE-2026-23241, CVE-2026-23242,
CVE-2026-23243, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23266, CVE-2026-23270,
CVE-2026-23277, CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23286,
CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23293,
CVE-2026-23296, CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23303,
CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23318,
CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339,
CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357,
CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23367,
CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23379,
CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23391,
CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397,
CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23420,
CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454,
CVE-2026-23456, CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400, CVE-2026-31405,
CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408, CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31411,
CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31446,
CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31454,
CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467,
CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498, CVE-2026-31507,
CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522,
CVE-2026-31523, CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550,
CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31570,
CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586,
CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602,
CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616,
CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622,
CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626,
CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31630,
CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31656,
CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662,
CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31670,
CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674,
CVE-2026-31676, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31681,
CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686, CVE-2026-31687,
CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696, CVE-2026-31697,
CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31716,
CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31726, CVE-2026-31728,
CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31747, CVE-2026-31748,
CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31754,
CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758, CVE-2026-31759,
CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763, CVE-2026-31770,
CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31780, CVE-2026-31781,
CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015, CVE-2026-43020,
CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028,
CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43040,
CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43046, CVE-2026-43047,
CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054,
CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061, CVE-2026-43062,
CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069,
CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079,
CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43089, CVE-2026-43093,
CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104,
CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43112,
CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43123, CVE-2026-43124, CVE-2026-43130,
CVE-2026-43132, CVE-2026-43133, CVE-2026-43134, CVE-2026-43135,
CVE-2026-43136, CVE-2026-43139, CVE-2026-43140, CVE-2026-43141,
CVE-2026-43145, CVE-2026-43147, CVE-2026-43148, CVE-2026-43149,
CVE-2026-43152, CVE-2026-43156, CVE-2026-43158, CVE-2026-43159,
CVE-2026-43163, CVE-2026-43168, CVE-2026-43171, CVE-2026-43180,
CVE-2026-43182, CVE-2026-43183, CVE-2026-43184, CVE-2026-43187,
CVE-2026-43190, CVE-2026-43194, CVE-2026-43196, CVE-2026-43200,
CVE-2026-43202, CVE-2026-43203, CVE-2026-43205, CVE-2026-43206,
CVE-2026-43207, CVE-2026-43209, CVE-2026-43211, CVE-2026-43218,
CVE-2026-43223, CVE-2026-43225, CVE-2026-43226, CVE-2026-43227,
CVE-2026-43230, CVE-2026-43231, CVE-2026-43232, CVE-2026-43233,
CVE-2026-43236, CVE-2026-43241, CVE-2026-43242, CVE-2026-43246,
CVE-2026-43251, CVE-2026-43255, CVE-2026-43257, CVE-2026-43261,
CVE-2026-43262, CVE-2026-43264, CVE-2026-43266, CVE-2026-43268,
CVE-2026-43269, CVE-2026-43270, CVE-2026-43273, CVE-2026-43275,
CVE-2026-43277, CVE-2026-43279, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43283,
CVE-2026-43287, CVE-2026-43289, CVE-2026-43291, CVE-2026-43295,
CVE-2026-43296, CVE-2026-43302, CVE-2026-43312, CVE-2026-43313,
CVE-2026-43314, CVE-2026-43315, CVE-2026-43316, CVE-2026-43324,
CVE-2026-43327, CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43333,
CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340,
CVE-2026-43342, CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43363,
CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43373, CVE-2026-43380,
CVE-2026-43381, CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387,
CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43425,
CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428, CVE-2026-43429,
CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43445,
CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451, CVE-2026-43452,
CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466,
CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475,
CVE-2026-43476, CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43496,
CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835,
CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840,
CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844,
CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45847, CVE-2026-45848, CVE-2026-45852,
CVE-2026-45856, CVE-2026-45857, CVE-2026-45860, CVE-2026-45862,
CVE-2026-45864, CVE-2026-45866, CVE-2026-45867, CVE-2026-45868,
CVE-2026-45869, CVE-2026-45870, CVE-2026-45871, CVE-2026-45873,
CVE-2026-45875, CVE-2026-45879, CVE-2026-45883, CVE-2026-45885,
CVE-2026-45890, CVE-2026-45891, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45902,
CVE-2026-45904, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45912, CVE-2026-45915,
CVE-2026-45916, CVE-2026-45919, CVE-2026-45920, CVE-2026-45924,
CVE-2026-45935, CVE-2026-45936, CVE-2026-45941, CVE-2026-45946,
CVE-2026-45948, CVE-2026-45954, CVE-2026-45956, CVE-2026-45958,
CVE-2026-45960, CVE-2026-45964, CVE-2026-45965, CVE-2026-45968,
CVE-2026-45969, CVE-2026-45970, CVE-2026-45974, CVE-2026-45978,
CVE-2026-45983, CVE-2026-45984, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986,
CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46004,
CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46015, CVE-2026-46018,
CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024,
CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46040,
CVE-2026-46044, CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049,
CVE-2026-46050, CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46062,
CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46077,
CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46098,
CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46107,
CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46122,
CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128,
CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46146,
CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46161,
CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46172,
CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46184,
CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46197,
CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46209,
CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220,
CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46233,
CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46249,
CVE-2026-46250, CVE-2026-46253, CVE-2026-46259, CVE-2026-46267,
CVE-2026-46270, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46275,
CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303,
CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-46328,
CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52914, CVE-2026-52915,
CVE-2026-52916, CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52921,
CVE-2026-52922, CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52926, CVE-2026-52931,
CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958,
CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970,
CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986,
CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52998,
CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003,
CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012,
CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023,
CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041,
CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047,
CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53059,
CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53064,
CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071,
CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075,
CVE-2026-53077, CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093,
CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53130,
CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295,
CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306, CVE-2026-53309,
CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53379, CVE-2026-63860,
CVE-2026-63865, CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64032, CVE-2026-64033,
CVE-2026-64034, CVE-2026-64039, CVE-2026-64046, CVE-2026-64047,
CVE-2026-64055, CVE-2026-64056, CVE-2026-64083, CVE-2026-64084,
CVE-2026-64085, CVE-2026-64086, CVE-2026-64087, CVE-2026-64088,
CVE-2026-64089, CVE-2026-64096, CVE-2026-64102, CVE-2026-64103,
CVE-2026-64113, CVE-2026-64114, CVE-2026-64115, CVE-2026-64125,
CVE-2026-64133, CVE-2026-64135, CVE-2026-64153, CVE-2026-64155,
CVE-2026-64164, CVE-2026-64165, CVE-2026-64166, CVE-2026-64168,
CVE-2026-64173, CVE-2026-64174, CVE-2026-64177, CVE-2026-64178,
CVE-2026-64179, CVE-2026-64185)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Fujitsu joins £14.9B UK framework despite public sector bid freeze]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Supplier says the Horizon-era pause only stops it chasing work from new government customers]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691465/it-nachrichten/fujitsu-joins-149b-uk-framework-despite-public-sector-bid-freeze/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691465/it-nachrichten/fujitsu-joins-149b-uk-framework-despite-public-sector-bid-freeze/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:05:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Supplier says the Horizon-era pause only stops it chasing work from new government customers]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Whack-a-drone]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In Pasadena, California, there's a cute red brick courtyard where one storefront isn't like the rest. The glass doors open onto a sparse industrial hallway, which leads to a sunlit foyer with a large spiral staircase. Go up, and you'll see a typical coworking space: open tables, healthy snacks, a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691451/it-nachrichten/whack-a-drone/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691451/it-nachrichten/whack-a-drone/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:04:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In Pasadena, California, there's a cute red brick courtyard where one storefront isn't like the rest. The glass doors open onto a sparse industrial hallway, which leads to a sunlit foyer with a large spiral staircase. Go up, and you'll see a typical coworking space: open tables, healthy snacks, a collection of meeting rooms with […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Forensic Focus Digest, July 24 2026]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Explore the impact of cumulative trauma on digital forensic investigators, faster triage with ADF Pro, feature-phone recovery using MSAB XRY Pro, and Katelyn Rogers’ Chip ID Framework and SpecTacular.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691430/it-security-nachrichten/forensic-focus-digest-july-24-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691430/it-security-nachrichten/forensic-focus-digest-july-24-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:42:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Explore the impact of cumulative trauma on digital forensic investigators, faster triage with ADF Pro, feature-phone recovery using MSAB XRY Pro, and Katelyn Rogers’ Chip ID Framework and SpecTacular.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hacker Runs Hermes AI Agent Unattended for Post-Exploitation at Thai Finance Ministry]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Someone installed a popular AI assistant on a rented server, switched off the setting that makes it ask permission before running risky commands, and pointed it at Thailand’s Ministry of Finance, which runs the country’s treasury and tax collection. The…
Read more →
The post Hacker Runs Hermes AI...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691354/it-security-nachrichten/hacker-runs-hermes-ai-agent-unattended-for-post-exploitation-at-thai-finance-ministry/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691354/it-security-nachrichten/hacker-runs-hermes-ai-agent-unattended-for-post-exploitation-at-thai-finance-ministry/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:12:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone installed a popular AI assistant on a rented server, switched off the setting that makes it ask permission before running risky commands, and pointed it at Thailand’s Ministry of Finance, which runs the country’s treasury and tax collection. The…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/hacker-runs-hermes-ai-agent-unattended-for-post-exploitation-at-thai-finance-ministry/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/hacker-runs-hermes-ai-agent-unattended-for-post-exploitation-at-thai-finance-ministry/">Hacker Runs Hermes AI Agent Unattended for Post-Exploitation at Thai Finance Ministry</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why I changed how I pitch AI: It’s no longer about saving money, but managing tokens and adoption]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I have worked alongside enterprise technology for more than 30 years and watched AI evolve from a lab experiment into the modern boardroom’s core focus. However, the last few years of implementing AI alongside our customers have delivered our most profound reality checks.



The initial hype has ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691324/it-nachrichten/why-i-changed-how-i-pitch-ai-its-no-longer-about-saving-money-but-managing-tokens-and-adoption/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691324/it-nachrichten/why-i-changed-how-i-pitch-ai-its-no-longer-about-saving-money-but-managing-tokens-and-adoption/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:04:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have worked alongside enterprise technology for more than 30 years and watched AI evolve from a lab experiment into the modern boardroom’s core focus. However, the last few years of implementing AI alongside our customers have delivered our most profound reality checks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The initial hype has faded, leaving CIOs to drive real enterprise value. Based on my experience implementing Google, OpenAI and Anthropic technologies, here are the fundamental, technology-agnostic lessons every leader must anchor their strategy around.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>AI as a leadership multiplier</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most common tactical error we see is treating AI as an isolated technology project. What I have observed among our customers is that true success does not come from organizations that define a standalone “AI strategy,” but rather from those leaders that integrate AI into their business strategy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When our customers isolate AI and define an AI strategy, it inevitably treats it like a “technological toy” to experiment with. This approach yields fragmented, orphaned initiatives that fail to scale because they are fundamentally disconnected from their core corporate objectives. What I learned is that AI is not the ultimate destination; it is a powerful catalyst. We have replaced “What can AI do for our customers?” with a more strategic question, “How does AI accelerate their existing business goals?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Think of AI like electricity. No modern corporation designs a standalone “electricity strategy.” Instead, all companies route it invisibly across the entire organization to illuminate offices, power production lines and drive communication. AI must be woven into the enterprise fabric in the exact same way, acting as an underlying utility that supercharges your existing operational model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Integrating AI into the broader business strategy also dictates how we measure success. It forces a shift away from short-term tech vanity metrics and anchors the technology into a long-term roadmap.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When AI remains trapped within the IT department of our customers, we notice that it is relegated to a mere “software experiment.” To become a true competitive advantage, we observed that AI requires intense cross-functional orchestration. This perspective does not diminish the merit of the technical team; their expertise is fundamental for establishing the architecture, data governance and tools your enterprise requires. However, while IT builds the foundational infrastructure, it lacks the organizational authority to decide what should be built on top of it. Only the CEO or the owner of the company can step in to ensure AI leaves the “toy project” phase and integrates into the DNA of the organization.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The requirement for top-down, executive ownership stems from three critical realities observed in the field:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Silo-smashing and data collaboration:</strong> True enterprise AI is data-hungry and that data lives across disparate business lines, finance, operations, marketing and customer service. Only the CEO possesses the cross-functional authority to demand that data silos be dismantled.</li>



<li><strong>Cultural transformation and fear mitigation:</strong> AI triggers widespread anxiety over job displacement across all industries and hierarchies. When relegated to an “IT project,” resistance spikes as teams view it as a threat to their livelihoods. When I saw the CEO lead this cultural shift directly is when I noticed the best results.</li>



<li><strong>C-Suite education and strategic alignment:</strong> The mandate for AI capability cannot just be delegated downward; the transformation must begin at the very top. I have conducted more than 70 presentations for the Board of Directors and C-Level teams. These people need to be actively educated not on technical code, but on specific business use cases, return on investment (ROI) frameworks and how AI resolves core organizational bottlenecks.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/c-suite-insights/ceo-survey.html">PwC’s data found that only 12% of enterprises have achieved both cost and revenue benefits from AI</a>. Those elite 12% succeeded precisely because their CEOs embedded AI extensively across <em>strategic decision-making and cross-functional workflows</em>. AI is simply too disruptive and too critical to be left exclusively in the hands of technical experts. If AI is not on the CEO’s weekly agenda, it is fundamentally missing from the company’s true strategy.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>AI as a new operational framework</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Traditional IT systems have operated on strict algorithmic certainty: if you input a specific set of data, the system executes an immutable line of code and guarantees the same, predictable output every single time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI completely breaks this paradigm. Because modern AI is built on probabilistic models, it does not execute static formulas; instead, it predicts the most likely correct response based on mathematical probabilities. This means that AI solutions carry an inherent, small percentage of uncertainty and variability. A prompt entered today might yield a slightly different, though contextually valid, output tomorrow.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Executive leadership and organizational cultures must be actively educated to accept and navigate this fundamental shift. Traditional quality assurance frameworks for software are designed for a 100% success rate. Applying this rigid standard to AI will paralyze your initiatives, keeping 80% of your projects trapped eternally in the pilot phase. This happened to us in a food and beverage company in Latin America a couple of years ago. After this experience, we started to include conditions in our contracts that tolerate statistical margins of error and still define the project as a success.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In terms of cost calculation, we had to teach CIOs and business managers to forget the monthly subscription model for AI and learn to manage the primary unit of exchange in modern AI: the token.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To understand AI costs, executives must understand how large language models process data. AI models do not read full words; instead, they break text, images or code down into “pieces” called tokens. As a baseline, every 100 words process as approximately 130 to 140 tokens. Because the major AI providers use the token as their currency, <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.22750">your business is billed dynamically based on the exact volume of tokens consumed</a> by every query submitted (input) and every response generated (output).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many leaders believe AI costs are fixed due to flat-rate enterprise tiers ($25–$30/user). This is a temporary illusion. These venture-capital-subsidized rates mask true operational costs and come with dynamic usage limits. Modeling long-term ROI on them guarantees a severe budget shock when true consumption pricing takes over.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The solution is not to halt AI adoption; doing so means losing your competitive edge. Instead, the cost per token must cease to be treated as a technical footnote relegated to the IT department. It must be elevated to a core business variable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Risks in the AI adoption model</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Since the beginning of the AI boom, I have seen all our customers making a critical tactical error that could cost them heavily in the medium term: they are focusing only on operational efficiency (reducing costs with AI).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I have observed that an alarmingly high percentage of companies remain trapped in pilot phases focused exclusively on short-term cost reduction. <a href="https://www.bain.com/insights/your-ai-budget-is-growing-your-returns-arent-heres-why/">Bain &amp; Company’s global Automation and AI Pathfinder Survey </a>found that the largest share of companies measuring their AI initiatives (exactly 40%) realized cost reductions of 10% or less, heavily missing their internal targets. Our customers are putting too many resources and effort into marginal financial gains and in doing so, they are jeopardizing their most valuable assets: service quality, resilience and customer trust.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Utilizing AI solely to slash headcount or cut operational corners is a dangerous trap that introduces severe field liabilities. A financial service organization in Latin America announced that they saved $1 million in customer support by replacing humans with AI chatbots. However, the mid-term reality revealed a different story: a damaged brand reputation due to AI errors and an influx of frustrated clients fleeing because the automated system cannot handle special cases.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Putting a company on an extreme AI diet might make it look leaner on next quarter’s financial statement, but over-indexing on cost-cutting will ultimately leave the business too weak to compete when market dynamics shift. We are now inviting our customers to change the question from <em>“How much money will AI save us?”</em> to <em>“How will we leverage AI to exponentially increase the long-term value of our enterprise?”</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Deploying enterprise AI is a marathon, not a sprint, and the terrain changes with every mile. The organizations that thrive in this next era will be those that transition from fascination to discipline, treating AI not as a magic bullet for immediate savings, but as a core capability that demands rigorous governance, architectural foresight and cultural maturity. Navigating this shift requires moving past the theoretical hype and anchoring decisions in raw, field-tested reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As we continue to deploy these technologies across industries, the blueprint for success is being rewritten in real time. Let’s keep this conversation going as we map out the future of business intelligence together.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8603-1: Linux kernel (Azure) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691319/unix-server/usn-8603-1-linux-kernel-azure-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691319/unix-server/usn-8603-1-linux-kernel-azure-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:02:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - PSP security protocol;
  - ARM32 architecture;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - User-Mode Linux (UML);
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Intel NPU Driver;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Auxiliary display drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Ublk userspace block driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - Buffer Sharing and Synchronization framework;
  - DPLL subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - Arm Firmware Framework for ARMv8-A(FFA);
  - EFI core;
  - FWCTL subsystem;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Microsoft Hyper-V drivers;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - I3C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device core drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Texas Instruments network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - Parport drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - Chrome hardware platform drivers;
  - ACPI WMI driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - MediaTek PM domains;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - MPAM driver;
  - Amlogic Meson reset controller drivers;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - NVIDIA Tegra Control Backbone (CBB) driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - Thunderbolt and USB4 drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - Userspace I/O drivers;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Dual Role (OTG-ready) Controller drivers;
  - USB Serial drivers;
  - USB Type-C support driver;
  - USB Type-C Port Controller Manager driver;
  - TI TPS6598x USB Power Delivery controller driver;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - USB over IP driver;
  - vDPA drivers;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM AMD SEV Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - 9P distributed file system;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - AFS file system;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - HugeTLB file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Overlay file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - DRM TTM subsystem;
  - Codetag library;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - Memory management;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Freescale ENETC Ethernet drivers;
  - Memory Management;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Linked list library;
  - Netfilter;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Networking core;
  - Network shaper API;
  - Network traffic control;
  - TCP network protocol;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - IPC subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - DMA mapping infrastructure;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - IRQ subsystem;
  - Kexec HandOver (KHO);
  - Locking primitives;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Timer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Scatterlist API;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - 802.1Q VLAN protocol;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - Ethtool driver;
  - Handshake API;
  - HSR network protocol;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - IUCV driver;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - Key management;
  - Landlock security;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - SELinux security module;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - AudioScience HPI driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - FourSemi audio codecs;
  - Texas InstrumentS Audio (ASoC/HDA) drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31574, CVE-2026-31575, CVE-2026-31576,
CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31579, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584,
CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588,
CVE-2026-31589, CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31591, CVE-2026-31592,
CVE-2026-31593, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31600,
CVE-2026-31601, CVE-2026-31602, CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31604,
CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606, CVE-2026-31607, CVE-2026-31608,
CVE-2026-31609, CVE-2026-31610, CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612,
CVE-2026-31613, CVE-2026-31614, CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616,
CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31620,
CVE-2026-31621, CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624,
CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628,
CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31686, CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31696,
CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700,
CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31703, CVE-2026-31704,
CVE-2026-31705, CVE-2026-31706, CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708,
CVE-2026-31709, CVE-2026-31710, CVE-2026-31711, CVE-2026-31712,
CVE-2026-31713, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715, CVE-2026-31716,
CVE-2026-31717, CVE-2026-31718, CVE-2026-31719, CVE-2026-43058,
CVE-2026-43071, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073, CVE-2026-43348,
CVE-2026-43349, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43491,
CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43493, CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496,
CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43498, CVE-2026-43499, CVE-2026-43501,
CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836,
CVE-2026-45837, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840,
CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844,
CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987,
CVE-2026-45988, CVE-2026-45989, CVE-2026-45990, CVE-2026-45991,
CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-45995, CVE-2026-45996, CVE-2026-45997,
CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46001, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46003,
CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46007,
CVE-2026-46008, CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46010, CVE-2026-46011,
CVE-2026-46012, CVE-2026-46013, CVE-2026-46014, CVE-2026-46015,
CVE-2026-46016, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46020,
CVE-2026-46021, CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024,
CVE-2026-46025, CVE-2026-46026, CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46028,
CVE-2026-46029, CVE-2026-46030, CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46032,
CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46034, CVE-2026-46035, CVE-2026-46036,
CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46038, CVE-2026-46039, CVE-2026-46040,
CVE-2026-46041, CVE-2026-46042, CVE-2026-46043, CVE-2026-46044,
CVE-2026-46045, CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049,
CVE-2026-46050, CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053,
CVE-2026-46054, CVE-2026-46056, CVE-2026-46057, CVE-2026-46058,
CVE-2026-46059, CVE-2026-46060, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062,
CVE-2026-46063, CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46066,
CVE-2026-46067, CVE-2026-46068, CVE-2026-46069, CVE-2026-46070,
CVE-2026-46071, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073, CVE-2026-46074,
CVE-2026-46075, CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078,
CVE-2026-46079, CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46081, CVE-2026-46082,
CVE-2026-46083, CVE-2026-46084, CVE-2026-46085, CVE-2026-46086,
CVE-2026-46087, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089, CVE-2026-46090,
CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46093, CVE-2026-46094,
CVE-2026-46095, CVE-2026-46096, CVE-2026-46097, CVE-2026-46098,
CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46100, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102,
CVE-2026-46103, CVE-2026-46104, CVE-2026-46105, CVE-2026-46106,
CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46109, CVE-2026-46110,
CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113, CVE-2026-46114,
CVE-2026-46115, CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46118,
CVE-2026-46119, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121, CVE-2026-46122,
CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125, CVE-2026-46126,
CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129, CVE-2026-46130,
CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46134,
CVE-2026-46135, CVE-2026-46136, CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46138,
CVE-2026-46139, CVE-2026-46140, CVE-2026-46141, CVE-2026-46142,
CVE-2026-46143, CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146,
CVE-2026-46147, CVE-2026-46148, CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150,
CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46152, CVE-2026-46153, CVE-2026-46154,
CVE-2026-46155, CVE-2026-46156, CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46158,
CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160, CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46162,
CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46165, CVE-2026-46166,
CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46170,
CVE-2026-46171, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174,
CVE-2026-46175, CVE-2026-46176, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178,
CVE-2026-46179, CVE-2026-46180, CVE-2026-46181, CVE-2026-46182,
CVE-2026-46183, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46185, CVE-2026-46186,
CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46188, CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190,
CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46192, CVE-2026-46193, CVE-2026-46194,
CVE-2026-46195, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201, CVE-2026-46202,
CVE-2026-46203, CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206,
CVE-2026-46207, CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46210,
CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46213, CVE-2026-46214,
CVE-2026-46215, CVE-2026-46216, CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219,
CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46221, CVE-2026-46222, CVE-2026-46223,
CVE-2026-46224, CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227,
CVE-2026-46228, CVE-2026-46229, CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231,
CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46235,
CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46239, CVE-2026-46240,
CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46242, CVE-2026-46243, CVE-2026-46244,
CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46275, CVE-2026-46276,
CVE-2026-46277, CVE-2026-46278, CVE-2026-46279, CVE-2026-46280,
CVE-2026-46281, CVE-2026-46282, CVE-2026-46283, CVE-2026-46284,
CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286, CVE-2026-46287, CVE-2026-46288,
CVE-2026-46289, CVE-2026-46290, CVE-2026-46291, CVE-2026-46292,
CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46295, CVE-2026-46296,
CVE-2026-46297, CVE-2026-46298, CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301,
CVE-2026-46302, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46305,
CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46308, CVE-2026-46309,
CVE-2026-46310, CVE-2026-46311, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46313,
CVE-2026-46314, CVE-2026-46315, CVE-2026-46316, CVE-2026-46317,
CVE-2026-46318, CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-46320, CVE-2026-46321,
CVE-2026-46322, CVE-2026-46324, CVE-2026-46332, CVE-2026-52904,
CVE-2026-52905, CVE-2026-52906, CVE-2026-52907, CVE-2026-52911,
CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52913, CVE-2026-52914, CVE-2026-52915,
CVE-2026-52916, CVE-2026-52918, CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920,
CVE-2026-52921, CVE-2026-52922, CVE-2026-52923, CVE-2026-52925,
CVE-2026-52926, CVE-2026-52927, CVE-2026-52928, CVE-2026-52931,
CVE-2026-52932, CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52934, CVE-2026-52936,
CVE-2026-52937, CVE-2026-52941, CVE-2026-52943, CVE-2026-52944,
CVE-2026-52949, CVE-2026-52950, CVE-2026-52951, CVE-2026-52952,
CVE-2026-52953, CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52956,
CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52959, CVE-2026-52960,
CVE-2026-52961, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964,
CVE-2026-52965, CVE-2026-52967, CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969,
CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52971, CVE-2026-52973, CVE-2026-52974,
CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52976, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52978,
CVE-2026-52979, CVE-2026-52980, CVE-2026-52981, CVE-2026-52982,
CVE-2026-52983, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986,
CVE-2026-52987, CVE-2026-52988, CVE-2026-52989, CVE-2026-52990,
CVE-2026-52991, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52994,
CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52996, CVE-2026-52997, CVE-2026-52998,
CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53000, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002,
CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53005, CVE-2026-53006,
CVE-2026-53007, CVE-2026-53008, CVE-2026-53009, CVE-2026-53010,
CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014,
CVE-2026-53015, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53017, CVE-2026-53018,
CVE-2026-53019, CVE-2026-53020, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022,
CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53024, CVE-2026-53025, CVE-2026-53026,
CVE-2026-53027, CVE-2026-53028, CVE-2026-53029, CVE-2026-53030,
CVE-2026-53031, CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034,
CVE-2026-53035, CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53038,
CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53042,
CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53044, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046,
CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050,
CVE-2026-53051, CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53053, CVE-2026-53054,
CVE-2026-53055, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53057, CVE-2026-53058,
CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062,
CVE-2026-53063, CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066,
CVE-2026-53067, CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53070,
CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074,
CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076, CVE-2026-53077, CVE-2026-53078,
CVE-2026-53079, CVE-2026-53080, CVE-2026-53081, CVE-2026-53082,
CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084, CVE-2026-53085, CVE-2026-53086,
CVE-2026-53087, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53089, CVE-2026-53090,
CVE-2026-53091, CVE-2026-53092, CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53094,
CVE-2026-53095, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098,
CVE-2026-53099, CVE-2026-53100, CVE-2026-53101, CVE-2026-53102,
CVE-2026-53103, CVE-2026-53104, CVE-2026-53105, CVE-2026-53106,
CVE-2026-53107, CVE-2026-53108, CVE-2026-53109, CVE-2026-53110,
CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53113, CVE-2026-53114,
CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53116, CVE-2026-53117, CVE-2026-53118,
CVE-2026-53119, CVE-2026-53120, CVE-2026-53121, CVE-2026-53122,
CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53124, CVE-2026-53125, CVE-2026-53126,
CVE-2026-53127, CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53129, CVE-2026-53130,
CVE-2026-53174, CVE-2026-53277, CVE-2026-53278, CVE-2026-53279,
CVE-2026-53280, CVE-2026-53281, CVE-2026-53282, CVE-2026-53283,
CVE-2026-53284, CVE-2026-53285, CVE-2026-53286, CVE-2026-53287,
CVE-2026-53288, CVE-2026-53289, CVE-2026-53290, CVE-2026-53291,
CVE-2026-53292, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295,
CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53297, CVE-2026-53298, CVE-2026-53299,
CVE-2026-53300, CVE-2026-53301, CVE-2026-53302, CVE-2026-53303,
CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53305, CVE-2026-53306, CVE-2026-53307,
CVE-2026-53308, CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53310, CVE-2026-53311,
CVE-2026-53312, CVE-2026-53313, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53315,
CVE-2026-53316, CVE-2026-53317, CVE-2026-53318, CVE-2026-53319,
CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53321, CVE-2026-53322, CVE-2026-53323,
CVE-2026-53324, CVE-2026-53357, CVE-2026-53358, CVE-2026-53360,
CVE-2026-53364, CVE-2026-53365, CVE-2026-53367, CVE-2026-53368,
CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53370, CVE-2026-53371, CVE-2026-53372,
CVE-2026-53373, CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375, CVE-2026-53376,
CVE-2026-53377, CVE-2026-53378, CVE-2026-53379, CVE-2026-53380,
CVE-2026-63837, CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63839, CVE-2026-63840,
CVE-2026-63841, CVE-2026-63842, CVE-2026-63843, CVE-2026-63844,
CVE-2026-63845, CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847, CVE-2026-63848,
CVE-2026-63849, CVE-2026-63850, CVE-2026-63851, CVE-2026-63852,
CVE-2026-63853, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855, CVE-2026-63856,
CVE-2026-63857, CVE-2026-63858, CVE-2026-63859, CVE-2026-63860,
CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862, CVE-2026-63863, CVE-2026-63864,
CVE-2026-63865, CVE-2026-63866, CVE-2026-63875, CVE-2026-63876,
CVE-2026-63877, CVE-2026-63878, CVE-2026-63879, CVE-2026-63880,
CVE-2026-63881, CVE-2026-63882, CVE-2026-63883, CVE-2026-63884,
CVE-2026-63886, CVE-2026-63887, CVE-2026-63888, CVE-2026-63889,
CVE-2026-63890, CVE-2026-63891, CVE-2026-63892, CVE-2026-63893,
CVE-2026-63894, CVE-2026-63895, CVE-2026-63896, CVE-2026-63897,
CVE-2026-63898, CVE-2026-63899, CVE-2026-63900, CVE-2026-63901,
CVE-2026-63902, CVE-2026-63903, CVE-2026-63904, CVE-2026-63905,
CVE-2026-63906, CVE-2026-63907, CVE-2026-63908, CVE-2026-63910,
CVE-2026-63911, CVE-2026-63912, CVE-2026-63913, CVE-2026-63914,
CVE-2026-63915, CVE-2026-63916, CVE-2026-63917, CVE-2026-63918,
CVE-2026-63919, CVE-2026-63920, CVE-2026-63921, CVE-2026-63922,
CVE-2026-63923, CVE-2026-63924, CVE-2026-63925, CVE-2026-63926,
CVE-2026-63927, CVE-2026-63928, CVE-2026-63929, CVE-2026-63930,
CVE-2026-63931, CVE-2026-63932, CVE-2026-63933, CVE-2026-63934,
CVE-2026-63935, CVE-2026-63936, CVE-2026-63937, CVE-2026-63938,
CVE-2026-63939, CVE-2026-63940, CVE-2026-63941, CVE-2026-63942,
CVE-2026-63943, CVE-2026-63944, CVE-2026-63945, CVE-2026-63946,
CVE-2026-63947, CVE-2026-63948, CVE-2026-63949, CVE-2026-63950,
CVE-2026-63951, CVE-2026-63952, CVE-2026-63953, CVE-2026-63954,
CVE-2026-63955, CVE-2026-63956, CVE-2026-63957, CVE-2026-63958,
CVE-2026-63959, CVE-2026-63960, CVE-2026-63961, CVE-2026-63962,
CVE-2026-63963, CVE-2026-63964, CVE-2026-63965, CVE-2026-63966,
CVE-2026-63967, CVE-2026-63968, CVE-2026-63969, CVE-2026-63970,
CVE-2026-63971, CVE-2026-63972, CVE-2026-63973, CVE-2026-63974,
CVE-2026-63975, CVE-2026-63976, CVE-2026-63977, CVE-2026-63978,
CVE-2026-63979, CVE-2026-63980, CVE-2026-63981, CVE-2026-63982,
CVE-2026-63983, CVE-2026-63984, CVE-2026-63985, CVE-2026-63986,
CVE-2026-63987, CVE-2026-63988, CVE-2026-63989, CVE-2026-63990,
CVE-2026-63991, CVE-2026-63992, CVE-2026-63993, CVE-2026-63994,
CVE-2026-63995, CVE-2026-63996, CVE-2026-63997, CVE-2026-63998,
CVE-2026-63999, CVE-2026-64000, CVE-2026-64001, CVE-2026-64002,
CVE-2026-64003, CVE-2026-64004, CVE-2026-64005, CVE-2026-64006,
CVE-2026-64007, CVE-2026-64008, CVE-2026-64009, CVE-2026-64010,
CVE-2026-64011, CVE-2026-64012, CVE-2026-64013, CVE-2026-64014,
CVE-2026-64015, CVE-2026-64017, CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64019,
CVE-2026-64020, CVE-2026-64021, CVE-2026-64022, CVE-2026-64023,
CVE-2026-64024, CVE-2026-64025, CVE-2026-64026, CVE-2026-64027,
CVE-2026-64029, CVE-2026-64030, CVE-2026-64031, CVE-2026-64032,
CVE-2026-64033, CVE-2026-64034, CVE-2026-64035, CVE-2026-64036,
CVE-2026-64037, CVE-2026-64038, CVE-2026-64039, CVE-2026-64040,
CVE-2026-64041, CVE-2026-64042, CVE-2026-64043, CVE-2026-64044,
CVE-2026-64045, CVE-2026-64046, CVE-2026-64047, CVE-2026-64048,
CVE-2026-64049, CVE-2026-64050, CVE-2026-64051, CVE-2026-64052,
CVE-2026-64053, CVE-2026-64054, CVE-2026-64055, CVE-2026-64056,
CVE-2026-64057, CVE-2026-64058, CVE-2026-64059, CVE-2026-64060,
CVE-2026-64061, CVE-2026-64062, CVE-2026-64063, CVE-2026-64064,
CVE-2026-64065, CVE-2026-64066, CVE-2026-64067, CVE-2026-64068,
CVE-2026-64069, CVE-2026-64070, CVE-2026-64071, CVE-2026-64072,
CVE-2026-64073, CVE-2026-64074, CVE-2026-64075, CVE-2026-64076,
CVE-2026-64077, CVE-2026-64078, CVE-2026-64079, CVE-2026-64080,
CVE-2026-64081, CVE-2026-64082, CVE-2026-64083, CVE-2026-64084,
CVE-2026-64085, CVE-2026-64086, CVE-2026-64087, CVE-2026-64088,
CVE-2026-64089, CVE-2026-64090, CVE-2026-64091, CVE-2026-64093,
CVE-2026-64094, CVE-2026-64095, CVE-2026-64096, CVE-2026-64097,
CVE-2026-64098, CVE-2026-64099, CVE-2026-64100, CVE-2026-64101,
CVE-2026-64102, CVE-2026-64103, CVE-2026-64104, CVE-2026-64105,
CVE-2026-64106, CVE-2026-64107, CVE-2026-64108, CVE-2026-64109,
CVE-2026-64110, CVE-2026-64111, CVE-2026-64112, CVE-2026-64113,
CVE-2026-64114, CVE-2026-64115, CVE-2026-64116, CVE-2026-64117,
CVE-2026-64118, CVE-2026-64119, CVE-2026-64120, CVE-2026-64121,
CVE-2026-64122, CVE-2026-64123, CVE-2026-64124, CVE-2026-64125,
CVE-2026-64126, CVE-2026-64127, CVE-2026-64128, CVE-2026-64129,
CVE-2026-64130, CVE-2026-64131, CVE-2026-64132, CVE-2026-64133,
CVE-2026-64134, CVE-2026-64135, CVE-2026-64136, CVE-2026-64137,
CVE-2026-64138, CVE-2026-64140, CVE-2026-64141, CVE-2026-64142,
CVE-2026-64143, CVE-2026-64144, CVE-2026-64145, CVE-2026-64146,
CVE-2026-64147, CVE-2026-64148, CVE-2026-64149, CVE-2026-64150,
CVE-2026-64151, CVE-2026-64152, CVE-2026-64153, CVE-2026-64154,
CVE-2026-64155, CVE-2026-64156, CVE-2026-64157, CVE-2026-64158,
CVE-2026-64159, CVE-2026-64160, CVE-2026-64161, CVE-2026-64162,
CVE-2026-64163, CVE-2026-64164, CVE-2026-64165, CVE-2026-64166,
CVE-2026-64167, CVE-2026-64168, CVE-2026-64169, CVE-2026-64170,
CVE-2026-64171, CVE-2026-64172, CVE-2026-64173, CVE-2026-64174,
CVE-2026-64175, CVE-2026-64176, CVE-2026-64177, CVE-2026-64178,
CVE-2026-64179, CVE-2026-64180, CVE-2026-64181, CVE-2026-64182,
CVE-2026-64183, CVE-2026-64184, CVE-2026-64185, CVE-2026-64186)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hacker Runs Hermes AI Agent Unattended for Post-Exploitation at Thai Finance Ministry]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Someone installed a popular AI assistant on a rented server, switched off the setting that makes it ask permission before running risky commands, and pointed it at Thailand's Ministry of Finance, which runs the country's treasury and tax collection.

The agent then worked through the ministry's n...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691316/it-security-nachrichten/hacker-runs-hermes-ai-agent-unattended-for-post-exploitation-at-thai-finance-ministry/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691316/it-security-nachrichten/hacker-runs-hermes-ai-agent-unattended-for-post-exploitation-at-thai-finance-ministry/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:56:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Someone installed a popular AI assistant on a rented server, switched off the setting that makes it ask permission before running risky commands, and pointed it at Thailand's Ministry of Finance, which runs the country's treasury and tax collection.

The agent then worked through the ministry's network on its own, checking hosts for ways to gain root access, hunting through file systems, and]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[ISC2 seeks input from IT pros for AI security certification]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[ISC2 has begun developing a vendor-neutral AI security certification aimed at cybersecurity professionals working to secure AI systems and manage emerging AI risks.



The nonprofit organization, best known for the CISSP certification, says it is seeking volunteers worldwide to help define the kn...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691227/it-security-nachrichten/isc2-seeks-input-from-it-pros-for-ai-security-certification/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691227/it-security-nachrichten/isc2-seeks-input-from-it-pros-for-ai-security-certification/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:09:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.isc2.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">ISC2</a> has begun developing a <a href="https://www.isc2.org/new-ai-certification#AI%20Security%20Certification%20Frequently%20Asked%20Questions" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">vendor-neutral AI security certification</a> aimed at cybersecurity professionals working to secure AI systems and manage emerging AI risks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The nonprofit organization, best known for the <a href="https://www.isc2.org/certifications/cissp" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">CISSP certification</a>, says it is seeking volunteers worldwide to help define the knowledge and <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/3566827/global-cybersecurity-talent-gap-widens.html" target="_blank">skills</a> that will shape the new credential. While ISC2 has not finalized the certification domains, the <a href="https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/isc2-begins-developing-its-ai-security-certification-and-opens-call-for-volunteers-worldwide-302825622.html?tc=eml_cleartime" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">certification</a> is expected to address both technical AI security and governance topics, with a pilot exam planned before the end of 2026.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/caseymarks/">Casey Marks</a>, ISC2 chief operating officer, feedback from cybersecurity practitioners led ISC2 to conclude that AI security had grown beyond expanding AI content within existing certifications.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“AI has reached a tipping point,” Marks says. “AI no longer is just another tool; instead, it has fundamentally changed the cybersecurity practice itself.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ISC2 already includes <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4196919/isc2-ai-raises-accountability-demands-for-cybersecurity-teams.html" target="_blank">AI-related content in certifications</a> including CISSP and <a href="https://www.isc2.org/certifications/CCSP" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">CCSP</a>, but Marks says practitioners have identified new responsibilities and risks that extend beyond those programs. “Enterprise security teams are currently grappling with significant knowledge gaps, particularly around securing model architectures against new vulnerabilities like prompt injection, data poisoning, and model inversion,” Marks adds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Organizations are working to understand emerging governance frameworks, including the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and ISO/IEC 42001, while adapting traditional application security and security operations workflows to AI systems, he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ISC2 has not finalized the certification domains, but Marks says the organization expects the credential to address both technical controls and governance practices for <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4174188/ai-reshapes-cybersecurity-workforce-priorities-as-it-teams-brace-for-new-risks.html" target="_blank">securing AI systems and managing AI risk</a>. The certification will use ISC2’s established certification development process, which relies on cybersecurity practitioners to define job roles, develop exam content, and validate competencies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Marks says ISC2 will continue to update the certification through ongoing input from cybersecurity professionals, in addition to its regular certification review process.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The organization is also determining which professionals the certification will target. Marks says AI security responsibilities are emerging across security architecture, risk management, security operations, software development security, governance and compliance, communication and network security, and security assessment and testing. ISC2 says the certification will reflect how those roles are evolving.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For organizations that are building AI security programs now, Marks recommends using existing AI training resources, adopting established governance frameworks, creating cross-functional AI security working groups, and participating in the certification development process.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Marks says ISC2 expects AI knowledge to become part of most cybersecurity roles while a more specialized AI security discipline continues to develop. He says organizations will increasingly need professionals with foundational AI security knowledge, as well as specialists in areas such as adversarial machine learning, model architectures, and AI data pipelines.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking ahead, Marks says he expects AI security expertise to evolve into both a foundational skill for cybersecurity professionals and a specialized discipline of its own.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“At this time, we are seeing a hybrid evolution occurring in real time: AI security is simultaneously becoming a baseline expectation for all security roles, while also carving out a dedicated, highly specialized discipline,” Marks says.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[3 cybersecurity issues that should keep every CEO awake at night]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For years, I have been saying that cybersecurity is no longer a technology problem. It has become a business leadership challenge.



Yet, despite record levels of spending, ever-growing security teams, increasingly sophisticated technologies and a constant stream of new regulations, organization...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691226/it-security-nachrichten/3-cybersecurity-issues-that-should-keep-every-ceo-awake-at-night/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691226/it-security-nachrichten/3-cybersecurity-issues-that-should-keep-every-ceo-awake-at-night/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:09:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For years, I have been saying that cybersecurity is no longer a technology problem. It has become a business leadership challenge.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Yet, despite record levels of spending, ever-growing security teams, increasingly sophisticated technologies and a constant stream of new regulations, organizations continue to suffer major cyber incidents with alarming regularity. Every week seems to bring news of another ransomware attack, supply chain compromise or data breach affecting organizations that many would have assumed were well protected.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The obvious conclusion is that we are asking the wrong questions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Too many executive teams remain preoccupied with the latest threat actor, the newest security product the CISO wants to buy or the latest vulnerability making headlines. Those issues matter, but they are not what should be keeping CEOs awake at night.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In my view, there are three far more fundamental issues that deserve the attention of every chief executive.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">1. Corporate complexity, and the widening gap between business leadership and cybersecurity reality</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Perhaps the biggest cybersecurity risk facing large organizations today is not technical at all.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is the growing disconnect between executive perception and operational reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many boards genuinely believe their organizations are reasonably well protected. They receive regular dashboards showing improving maturity scores, increasing compliance levels, falling vulnerability counts and reassuring traffic-light reports.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unfortunately, cyber attackers do not read dashboards.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Behind those executive reports often lies an increasingly complex technology landscape, thousands of unmanaged digital assets, ageing infrastructure, rampant shadow IT, fragmented ownership, inconsistent governance and security teams struggling to keep pace with relentless business change.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The problem is rarely a lack of effort.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is that corporate complexity has reached a level where traditional governance mechanisms are no longer capable of providing an accurate picture of organizational resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Executives believe they understand the level of cyber risk they face because they receive regular reports. Those reports often measure activity rather than resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Governance committees end up debating around another percentage point of phishing awareness or vulnerability remediation, while fundamental issues remain unaddressed in the background.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">2. Organizational inertia, and the need for executive structure to evolve faster</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cyber criminals continue to evolve rapidly. Large organizations generally do not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the second issue that should concern every CEO.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Throughout my career, I have observed organizations repeatedly responding to new cyber threats by adding another technology platform, another monitoring capability, another compliance framework or another governance committee.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Very rarely do they stop to redesign how cybersecurity operates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The result is what I described several years ago as the “<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Cybersecurity-Spiral-Failure-How-Break/dp/1637353057/">Cybersecurity Spiral of Failure</a>”.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>As complexity and regulation increase, organizations invest in more security products.</li>



<li>More products create more complexity.</li>



<li>More products and greater complexity generate more alerts.</li>



<li>More alerts require more analysts.</li>



<li>More analysts produce more reports.</li>



<li>More reports continue to build up executive confidence.</li>



<li>Meanwhile, the underlying structural weaknesses remain largely unchanged, technical debt piles up and costs escalate.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And when the inevitable breach eventually happens, reality reveals itself, but distrust also sets in between senior executives and security teams.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is not a funding problem. Nor is it a skills problem. It is fundamentally an operating model problem.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many organizations continue trying to solve twenty-first century challenges using governance, accountability, organizational and reporting structures designed twenty-five years ago.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The cybersecurity function itself has evolved dramatically. Many executive structures have not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This organizational inertia extends beyond technology: It affects budgeting cycles, <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4193990/reallocating-cybersecurity-capital-in-the-mythos-era.html">investment priorities</a>, procurement processes, accountability models and decision-making speed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cyber attackers innovate every day. Organizational change often takes years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That imbalance should worry every CEO.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">3. Accelerating technological disruption, and how it challenges organizations in areas where they are intrinsically weak</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The third issue is potentially the most significant over the coming decade.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Artificial intelligence, autonomous agents and machine identities</li>



<li>Software supply chain complexity.</li>



<li>Quantum computing, and post-quantum cryptography</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each of these developments represents far more than another technical trend.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Together, they fundamentally change the dynamics of cybersecurity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Artificial intelligence is transforming countless business processes. At the same time, it is also increasing both the speed and sophistication of cyber-attacks while simultaneously transforming defensive capabilities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Organizations have become increasingly dependent on software ecosystems that extend far beyond their own direct control. Engaging with the supply chain in ways that lead to a genuine appreciation of the risks involved has become a key challenge for most cybersecurity practices.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Quantum computing may eventually invalidate much of today’s cryptographic algorithms, forcing organizations into one of the largest technology efforts since Y2K — but without the benefit of a fixed deadline and faced by a problem that is considerably more complex and hyperconnected IT estates that have little to do with those of the late 90s.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of these challenges can be solved overnight: They require clear governance, sustained investment over a few years and cross-functional organizational coordination.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most large organizations are weak on those three fronts: This is precisely why CEOs should be focusing on them now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Waiting until some of those risks become obvious will almost certainly be too late.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Businesses naturally prioritise immediate commercial pressures. Cybersecurity often involves preparing for risks whose timing remains uncertain.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But one of the greatest leadership failures I keep seeing remains the inability of organizations to act decisively on known unknowns.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That tension explains why many organizations delay action until external events force them to respond. Unfortunately, cybersecurity rarely rewards late action.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Leadership will determine who succeeds</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cybersecurity discussions still frequently focus on technology. I believe they should focus far more on leadership.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Technology will continue evolving. Threat actors will continue adapting. Regulations will continue expanding. Those developments are inevitable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What remains within the control of every CEO is how their organization responds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Does cybersecurity remain an IT issue? Or is it recognised as an integral part of business resilience?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">How is cybersecurity accountability assigned at executive level? Or does it still rest largely with a CISO hidden in the organization?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Does the board spend sufficient time discussing resilience? Or does cybersecurity appear only when approving budgets or reviewing incidents?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These questions will increasingly determine organizational success.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The companies that navigate the next decade successfully will not necessarily be those spending the most on cybersecurity. Nor will they be those deploying the latest security technologies first.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They will be the organizations whose leadership recognises that cybersecurity has become a permanent business capability — embedded into governance, strategy, operational decision-making and organizational culture.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That transformation cannot be delegated. It begins with the CEO.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And perhaps that is the single biggest issue that should keep every chief executive awake at night: Not when the next cyber-attack will happen, but whether their organization is evolving quickly enough on those matters to meet a threat landscape that is changing much faster than the business itself.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How to execute queries in parallel using EF Core]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[EF Core is Microsoft’s flagship ORM (object-relational mapper), the software layer that allows .NET developers to work with relational databases. The DbContext class is the core component of the EF Core framework for managing database operations. However, the DbContext class in EF Core is not thr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691080/ai-nachrichten/how-to-execute-queries-in-parallel-using-ef-core/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691080/ai-nachrichten/how-to-execute-queries-in-parallel-using-ef-core/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 11:04:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">EF Core is Microsoft’s flagship ORM (object-relational mapper), the software layer that allows .NET developers to work with relational databases. The <code>DbContext</code> class is the core component of the EF Core framework for managing database operations. However, the <code>DbContext</code> class in EF Core is not thread-safe. Hence, if you share <code>DbContext</code> instances between multiple threads, you will often encounter data corruption issues and the <code>InvalidOperationException</code>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In this article, we’ll learn how we can execute queries in parallel in EF Core by handling thread-safety issues to avoid concurrency errors. To work with the code examples provided in this article, you should have Visual Studio 2026 installed in your system. You can <a href="https://visualstudio.microsoft.com/insiders/">download Visual Studio 2026 here</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Executing EF Core queries in parallel – the problem</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When working in today’s data-driven applications, you will often need to fetch data from multiple unrelated datasets. In applications that use concurrency, thread-safety is critical to guaranteeing correct execution, avoiding data corruption and race conditions, and ensuring data consistency. Let’s understand this with an example. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let’s say we want to populate a dashboard that displays all recently processed orders, metrics, logs, and traces, as well as your application’s performance metadata. We might write the following code. </p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>public class Dashboard
{
    public List Orders { get; set; } = new();
    public Metrics Metrics { get; set; } = new();
    public List Logs { get; set; } = new();
    public List Traces { get; set; } = new();
}
public static async Task LoadDashboardAsync(ProductService productService)
{
    Task&lt;List&gt;    ordersTask  = productService.GetProcessedOrdersAsync();
    Task        metricsTask = productService.GetMetricsAsync();
    Task&lt;List&gt; logsTask    = productService.GetRecentLogsAsync();
    Task&lt;List&gt;    tracesTask  = productService.GetTracesAsync();
    await Task.WhenAll(ordersTask, metricsTask, logsTask, tracesTask);
    return new Dashboard
    {
        Orders  = await ordersTask,
        Metrics = await metricsTask,
        Logs    = await logsTask,
        Traces  = await tracesTask
    };
}
</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the preceding code snippet, there are four read operations that are executed by four different <code>Task</code> instances. Our objective is to ensure that the database round trips run in parallel instead of in sequence. We can accomplish this by using<code>Task.WhenAll</code>, which starts the four tasks, waits for every task to finish, then returns the data wrapped inside a new <code>Dashboard</code> instance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If we executed these queries sequentially, the user would have to wait until each query completed its execution in turn—for a total wait time equal to the sum of the times for all four queries. However, by running these queries in parallel, we reduce the wait time considerably. The user will need to wait only as long as it takes for the slowest of the four queries to complete its execution.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, there is a danger with the above approach. If you run multiple operations on the same <code>DbContext</code> instance, you will see an <code>InvalidOperationException</code> with the following message:</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A second operation started in this context before the previous operation was completed. This is usually caused by multiple threads using the same <code>DbContext</code> instance; instance members are not guaranteed to be thread-safe.</p>
</blockquote>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Databases such as SQL Server, PostgreSQL, and Oracle Database follow a request-response communication model at the connection level: a single connection can process only one command at a time. Hence, you cannot run multiple queries concurrently using the connection. If you <code>await</code> several operations using the same connection, EF Core detects the overlapping use of a non-thread-safe context and throws an <code>InvalidOperationException</code>. To run queries in parallel, you must give each task its own connection or context.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why DbContext isn’t thread-safe – and how to work around it</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <code>DbContext</code> class in EF Core is designed to manage a single unit of work. To be more precise, EF Core does not provide support for running multiple operations on the same <code>DbContext</code> instance. This design approach creates inherent challenges when you use the same <code>DbContext</code> instance across multiple threads. If <code>DbContext</code> were thread-safe, extensive locking would be required, which would degrade data access performance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This stateful design of <code>DbContext</code> makes it unsuitable for concurrent access patterns that involve loading, modifying, or tracking different sets of data simultaneously, because it needs to maintain the internal representation of database state.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/change-tracking/" data-type="link" data-id="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/change-tracking/">change tracker</a> is one of the most important components of <code>DbContext</code> in EF Core. It monitors all entities loaded into memory and detects any changes made to them after they have been loaded. It keeps track of the original, current, and changed values of the entities, thereby enabling the EF Core runtime to know the current state of these entities when you call the <code>SaveChanges()</code> method on the <code>DbContext</code> instance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To implement thread-safety when working with DbContext, we must write our code to ensure that each concurrent operation gets its own copy of a short-lived instance. Now, we <em>could</em> accomplish this by wrapping a shared <code>DbContext</code> instance inside a thread-safe block using the <code>lock</code> keyword, so that all calls to the database take place using one and only one thread at a time. This approach is illustrated in the code snippet below. </p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
public class Product
{
    public int Id { get; set; }
    public string Name { get; set; } = string.Empty;
    public decimal Price { get; set; }
    public int Quantity { get; set; }
}
public class AppDbContext : DbContext
{
    public AppDbContext(DbContextOptions options) : base(options) { }
    public DbSet Products =&gt; Set();
}
</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, while the above approach gives us the thread-safety we need, it can degrade data access performance considerably. A better approach is to use <code>IDbContextFactory</code> , which creates fresh <code>DbContext</code> instances on demand. Calling its <code>CreateDbContext()</code> method is cheap and produces a fresh, isolated context every time. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The following code snippet shows how you can register an instance of type <code>IDbContextFactory</code> as a singleton. You can safely call this code from any thread.</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>builder.Services.AddDbContextFactory(options =&gt;
    options.UseSqlServer(
        builder.Configuration.GetConnectionString("Default")));
</code></pre>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Executing EF Core queries in parallel – the solution</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now let’s see how we can put <code>IDbContextFactory</code> to work. The following code illustrates a class named <code>ProductService</code> that uses a factory to create <code>DbContext</code> instances for each scope of work.</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>public class ProductService
{
    private readonly IDbContextFactory _factory;
    public ProductService(IDbContextFactory factory)
        =&gt; _factory = factory;
    public async Task GetByIdAsync(int id)
    {
        await using var context = await _factory.CreateDbContextAsync();
        return await context.Products.FindAsync(id);
    }
    public async Task UpdateStockQuantityAsync(int id, int updateQuantity)
    {
        await using var context = await _factory.CreateDbContextAsync();
        var product = await context.Products.FindAsync(id);
        if (product is null) return;
        product.Quantity += updateQuantity;
        await context.SaveChangesAsync();
    }
}
</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Note that <code>ProductService</code> has two methods, <code>GetByIdAsync</code> and <code>UpdateStockQuantityAsync</code>. An instance of the <code>DbContext</code> class is created locally in each of these methods. Now, suppose you have two threads, T1 and T2, that execute these methods concurrently. That is, thread T1 executes the <code>GetByIdAsync</code> method while thread T2 executes the <code>UpdateStockQuantityAsync</code> method. Because each of these methods is executed in isolation, they will have their own context, connection, and change-tracking information, and there will be no mutable state, so you don’t need to implement thread synchronization in either of these methods.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Consider the following code that executes a read operation and an update operation in two separate tasks. </p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>public static async Task RunMethodsInParallelAsync(ProductService productService)
{
      Task readTask = productService.GetByIdAsync(1);
      Task updateTask = productService.UpdateStockQuantityAsync(3, 5);
      await Task.WhenAll(readTask, updateTask);
      Product? product = await readTask;
 }
</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <code>Task.WhenAll</code> method runs the two tasks in parallel and waits until both have finished. The reason this approach is thread-safe, and will not create concurrency errors, is that each of these two methods creates its own <code>DbContext</code> instance internally. Therefore the read operation and the update operation use independent <code>DbContext</code> instances.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Use DbContext pooling to reduce allocation cost</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Although creating <code>DbContext</code> instances is not that costly, you should consider using pooled contexts in applications that require high scalability and high performance. The following code snippet shows how you can register a pooled context. </p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>builder.Services.AddPooledDbContextFactory(options =&gt;
    options.UseSqlServer(connectionString));
</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A call to <code>AddDbContext()</code> will register a <code>DbContext</code> instance as scoped per HTTP request. Each request will run on a different thread and each will have its own context. However, keep in mind that the default scoped registration of the <code>DbContext</code> will not always suffice.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You will need a factory to create instances of <code>DbContext</code> when you’re using a background service, or performing some work inside a particular request, or running some business logic operation over multiple contexts.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Key takeaways</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>If you use EF Core in the data access layer of your application, you must implement thread safety measures whenever you run your queries in parallel.</li>



<li>You cannot execute multiple queries in parallel in EF Core using the same <code>DbContext</code> instance.</li>



<li>The <code>IDbContextFactory</code> enables you to create a <code>DbContext</code> instance for each thread, thereby enabling you to work with these instances in isolation.</li>



<li>Although using a <code>DbContext</code> pool involves a small allocation overhead, it becomes a non-issue if you need high throughput.</li>
</ul>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Microsoft agent framework wars are over. The real architecture decision starts now]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Over the past year, I had the same conversation with almost every team starting an AI initiative. Should we build on Semantic Kernel, AutoGen or Foundry?



At first it felt like the most important architectural decision we’d make. Each framework had its own philosophy, each promised to be the fo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691079/ai-nachrichten/the-microsoft-agent-framework-wars-are-over-the-real-architecture-decision-starts-now/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691079/ai-nachrichten/the-microsoft-agent-framework-wars-are-over-the-real-architecture-decision-starts-now/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 11:04:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over the past year, I had the same conversation with almost every team starting an AI initiative. Should we build on Semantic Kernel, AutoGen or Foundry?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At first it felt like the most important architectural decision we’d make. Each framework had its own philosophy, each promised to be the foundation for enterprise AI, and picking the wrong one felt like an expensive mistake. I spent a lot of time helping teams weigh the trade-offs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking back, I think we were asking the wrong question. I certainly was.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I watched teams spend months debating SDKs while the decisions that actually decided whether their applications survived production went unexamined. Some built elaborate orchestration layers for workflows that a few deterministic functions would have handled. Others avoided agent frameworks entirely and later found they’d designed themselves into a corner.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then Microsoft settled it for us. It <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/agent-framework/overview/">introduced the unified Agent Framework</a>, quietly moved Semantic Kernel and AutoGen into <a href="https://devblogs.microsoft.com/agent-framework/migrate-your-semantic-kernel-and-autogen-projects-to-microsoft-agent-framework-release-candidate/">maintenance mode</a>, and the debate I’d spent months refereeing was suddenly over. Turns out the answer to “which of the three” was “none of the three, here’s a fourth.” The framework hit version 1.0 and general availability in April 2026, stable across .NET and Python.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What surprised me wasn’t the decision. It was how fast a debate that had eaten so much of our attention stopped mattering. Microsoft changed the menu.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It didn’t change the meal.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The framework was never the hard part</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Framework selection dominated almost every early conversation I had about enterprise agents. Which SDK do we standardize on? Which orchestration model gives us the most flexibility? Which one is Microsoft actually betting on?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Fair questions. But after a year of watching these projects play out, I’ve slowly come around to a different view. Those weren’t the questions that decided anything.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first question I ask now is much smaller. Does this thing actually need an agent?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It sounds obvious, and I still get it wrong sometimes. But it’s the mistake I see most. On one project, a team spent weeks designing a multi-agent workflow for a process that ran the same four steps every time: read a document, validate it, call an API, send a notification. The diagrams looked great. The system in production didn’t. A few well-tested functions would have been easier to build, easier to maintain and a lot easier to trust.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Part of this is just that “<strong>agent</strong>” has become the word everyone reaches for. Sometimes it’s the right call. Sometimes it’s a workflow we already knew how to build, wearing a newer label. An agent earns its complexity when it genuinely has to decide things you can’t predetermine, choosing between tools, adapting to what it finds, working out its own next step. If you already know every step, you have a workflow, and a workflow is usually the better engineering choice. The consolidation didn’t change that. It just made it easier to see.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What building production agents actually taught me</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once I stopped fixating on frameworks, the same three problems kept showing up. None of them had anything to do with the SDK.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Context beats model choice</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Early on I spent a lot of time comparing models, the way you’d agonize over a restaurant menu and then order what you always order. Now I spend most of it thinking about context, which is far less fun and far more useful.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve watched good models fail because they were handed too much, not too little. One team I worked with gave the model access to nearly every internal document they had on the theory that more information meant better answers. It went the other way. Responses got slower, less consistent and sometimes skipped right past the thing that actually mattered. When we cut the context down to only what the task needed, the quality jumped almost immediately. I didn’t predict that. It taught me to be suspicious of “just give it everything.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best agent systems I’ve worked on weren’t the ones with the biggest context windows. They were the ones careful about what reached the model, and when. That’s not something the framework hands you.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Failure is where the real work is</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most agent demos look great because they’re built around the happy path. Production doesn’t extend that courtesy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I remember a project where everything held up in testing. Then a downstream API timed out after the agent had already completed several earlier steps. We couldn’t just restart, because part of the business process had already gone through. We ended up spending far more time on recovery logic than we ever spent on prompts. That project changed how I think about this work. The hard part was never getting the model to make a decision. It was making sure the system didn’t fall apart when reality refused to follow the script.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Tool calls fail partway through. APIs return inconsistent data. Models call the same tool over and over because the last answer wasn’t what they wanted. That’s not the exception; that’s a normal Tuesday. Whether you retry, roll back, pause for a human or push on with partial results is a judgment call, and no framework is going to make it for you.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Identity is the real security boundary</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This one surprised me most. The moment an agent stops being a chatbot and starts touching real business systems, identity matters more than orchestration.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every project gets to the same question eventually. Who is this agent actually acting as? The developer’s credentials? A service account? The user who asked? Get it wrong and you’ve built something autonomous running with more access than any single person should have, which is exactly the kind of thing that looks fine until an audit. The Agent Framework, like most modern tooling, makes it easier to wire agents to tools through standards like the <a href="https://modelcontextprotocol.io/">Model Context Protocol</a>. That helps. But where human approval belongs, what needs extra authorization, how much rope to give the thing, those are still yours to decide.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">The surprises weren’t technical</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here’s what I didn’t see coming. The hardest part of last year wasn’t technical at all. It was organizational. The moment a team heard “agent,” expectations shifted under everyone’s feet. Business stakeholders started expecting full autonomy. Developers assumed the thing could reason its way through anything. People started designing for flexibility before we’d even agreed on what problem we were solving. The word did damage before any code did. I found myself spending as much time resetting expectations as I did discussing architecture.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Build for change, not for today’s winner</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I don’t think the teams that struggled last year picked the wrong framework. Semantic Kernel was reasonable. AutoGen was reasonable. Foundry made sense for plenty of cases. I’d have signed off on any of them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The ones that got hurt put all their eggs in one framework, treating it as the foundation of the whole system instead of as one more dependency. Microsoft provided a migration path. But teams that had tightly coupled their applications to framework-specific abstractions discovered that migrating and rewriting are not the same thing. That wasn’t Microsoft’s doing. It was their own architecture’s. The teams that moved easily had kept their business logic, prompts and orchestration loose enough to evolve independently of any one SDK. For them, the change was a manageable project, not a teardown.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For what it’s worth, nobody I work with is treating this as an emergency. Most are moving the smaller workloads first, watching how they behave and leaving the production-critical systems alone until they actually understand the new abstractions. That’s the right instinct. And I doubt this is the last consolidation we’ll see, the ecosystem is still young, frameworks will keep absorbing each other and over time the differences between them will be operational more than architectural.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I don’t regret the framework debates, honestly. They were reasonable at the time. What changed wasn’t Microsoft’s roadmap.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It was mine. Watching these systems run in production taught me that the framework is the easiest piece to swap out. Recovery logic, context management, security boundaries, the business workflow itself, those stay with you long after today’s SDK gets replaced by tomorrow’s.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So, Microsoft made one decision easier by turning three frameworks into one. Good. Five years from now we’ll be on different tools, and we’ll still be asking the same handful of questions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Does this actually need an agent? Does it have the right context? Can it recover when something breaks, because something will? Is it acting as the right person?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those questions outlast every rewrite. That’s where I’ve learned to put my effort.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Frameworks come and go. Good architecture has to survive all of them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Russian-Linked Hackers Target Zimbra Users With Zero-Day Exploit]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A Zimbra phishing campaign attributed to Russian state-supported cyber actors has targeted Western government and commercial organizations, exploiting CVE-2025-66376 to access sensitive email data and other information, according to a joint cybersecurity advisory issued in July 2026.

The activ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690812/it-security-nachrichten/russian-linked-hackers-target-zimbra-users-with-zero-day-exploit/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690812/it-security-nachrichten/russian-linked-hackers-target-zimbra-users-with-zero-day-exploit/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:25:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="1536" height="1024" src="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/Zimbra-phishing-campaign.gif" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Zimbra phishing campaign" decoding="async" title="Russian-Linked Hackers Target Zimbra Users With Zero-Day Exploit 1"></p>A Zimbra phishing campaign attributed to Russian state-supported cyber actors has targeted Western government and commercial organizations, exploiting CVE-2025-66376 to access sensitive email data and other information, according to a joint cybersecurity advisory issued in July 2026.

The activity has been linked primarily to LAUNDRY BEAR, a Russian state-supported advanced persistent threat (APT) group tracked under several names across the cybersecurity industry. The advisory said the campaign has been active since at least July 2025 and has targeted organizations using the Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS).

Unlike conventional phishing attacks that typically require victims to click a malicious link or open an attachment, the campaign uses a view-based <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://cyble.com/exploit/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="exploit" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29111">exploit</a>. A user only needs to view a malicious email in a vulnerable version of ZCS webmail for the exploit to attempt execution.
<h3><strong>Zimbra Phishing Campaign Uses CVE-2025-66376</strong></h3>
The campaign centers on CVE-2025-66376, a vulnerability that was initially exploited as a <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/zero-day-vulnerability-microsoft-sharepoint/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">zero-day vulnerability </a>before a patch was released. According to the <a href="https://www.ic3.gov/CSA/2026/260723.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">advisory</a>, the activity began in July 2025, months before the vulnerability was published and patched.

The <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/firewall-daily/vulnerabilities/" title="vulnerability" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29110">vulnerability</a> allows a JavaScript payload contained in email content to execute because of improper sanitization of CSS @import directives within an email. The malicious payload uses Base64 encoding and XOR encryption and can be modified to help bypass basic threat detection signatures.

Once triggered, the payload attempts to collect and exfiltrate information through 12 stages. These include gathering the victim's email address and environment information, collecting two-factor authentication codes and application passwords, attempting to capture saved passwords, enabling mail protocols, gathering the Global Address List (GAL), and sending archived email <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-is-data/" title="data" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29112">data</a>.

The advisory said the campaign's use of a zero-day exploit demonstrates the ability of LAUNDRY BEAR to operationalize novel <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-are-vulnerabilities/" title="vulnerabilities" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29108">vulnerabilities</a> into a successful attack capability.
<h3><strong>LAUNDRY BEAR Targets Email and Sensitive Data</strong></h3>
The primary objective of the Russian state-supported <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/cyber-news/" title="cyber" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29109">cyber</a> actors appears to be the covert acquisition of email data. The campaign attempts to steal the last 90 days of email communications, email addresses, passwords, the organization's Global Address List, 2FA tokens and newly created application passcodes.

The actors have targeted organizations connected to the defense industrial base, government, education, energy, law enforcement, media, non-governmental organizations and technology sectors.

The advisory said LAUNDRY BEAR likely identifies organizations with publicly exposed Zimbra infrastructure through port scanning and commercially available datasets. It may then compile individual user email addresses using commercial data, open-source intelligence or previously exfiltrated information.

The group has also used compromised accounts to distribute <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://cyble.com/knowledge-hub/what-is-phishing/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="phishing" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29114">phishing</a> emails. Since at least November 2025, malicious emails were reportedly sent from victim infrastructure, potentially using previously compromised accounts to make the activity harder to detect and to bypass anti-phishing measures.
<h3><strong>Ulej and Flowerbed Support Email Data Exfiltration</strong></h3>
The campaign uses a custom capability called Ulej, which was developed to exploit ZCS and exfiltrate sensitive information. The collected data is sent to infrastructure associated with the Flowerbed framework.

Flowerbed is a Python project using Docker and includes four containers: Catcher, Certbot, Nginx and Gardener. Catcher receives and aggregates stolen information, while Nginx operates as an HTTPS reverse proxy. The framework uses DNS and HTTPS channels for <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/ai-driven-phishing-campaign/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">email data exfiltration</a>.

The advisory said the campaign can exfiltrate email content, contacts, attachments, authentication information and other data. The stolen information is initially stored by Catcher before being transferred to non-public-facing infrastructure.

The report also noted indications that artificial intelligence may have played a role in developing the Flowerbed codebase, highlighting the increasing use of AI in developing malicious capabilities.
<h3><strong>Organizations Urged to Patch Vulnerable Zimbra Systems</strong></h3>
The advisory urged organizations using ZCS to immediately ensure their systems are not running vulnerable versions. A patch for CVE-2025-66376 was released for ZCS versions 10.1.13 and 10.0.18.

If immediate patching is not possible, organizations are advised to have employees use alternative mail clients and avoid the Classic ZCS webmail client until the software is updated.

<a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/" title="Security" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29107">Security</a> teams are also advised to monitor internet-connected ZCS systems, workstations accessing those systems and network traffic for signs of suspicious activity. Recommended monitoring includes looking for large outbound data transfers to unfamiliar VPS providers, unusual DNS queries with random subdomains, sudden connections to newly established domains and connections involving <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/how-to-get-a-vpn/" title="VPN" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29113">VPN</a> providers such as Mullvad.

Organizations should also consider authentication services that support passkeys and maintain network monitoring, packet capture or NetFlow data and relevant logs.

The advisory further recommends that organizations identifying victims revoke Application Passcodes and 2FA scratch keys and require affected employees to change their passwords. Security teams should also investigate the original phishing email and quarantine similar messages to prevent further exploitation and data theft.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Critical Next.js Flaws Let Attackers Bypass Authentication and Launch SSRF Attacks]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Vercel has disclosed nine security vulnerabilities in Next.js, the widely used React framework, including two critical-severity flaws that allow attackers to bypass authentication middleware and hijack server-side requests. The advisories, published by researcher KarimPwnz, affect versions rangin...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690720/it-security-nachrichten/critical-nextjs-flaws-let-attackers-bypass-authentication-and-launch-ssrf-attacks/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690720/it-security-nachrichten/critical-nextjs-flaws-let-attackers-bypass-authentication-and-launch-ssrf-attacks/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 06:59:25 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vercel has disclosed nine security vulnerabilities in Next.js, the widely used React framework, including two critical-severity flaws that allow attackers to bypass authentication middleware and hijack server-side requests. The advisories, published by researcher KarimPwnz, affect versions ranging from 12.0.0 through 16.2.10, with patches available in 15.5.21 and 16.2.11. The most severe issue, tracked as CVE-2026-64642 […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cyberpress.org/critical-next-js-flaws-ssrf-attacks/">Critical Next.js Flaws Let Attackers Bypass Authentication and Launch SSRF Attacks</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cyberpress.org/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-61136 | Oracle Commerce Platform 11.4.0 Dynamo Application Framework privileges management (EUVD-2026-47345)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability has been found in Oracle Commerce Platform 11.4.0 and classified as critical. Impacted is an unknown function of the component Dynamo Application Framework. Performing a manipulation results in improper privilege management.

This vulnerability is known as CVE-2026-61136. Remote e...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690231/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-61136-oracle-commerce-platform-1140-dynamo-application-framework-privileges-management-euvd-2026-47345/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690231/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-61136-oracle-commerce-platform-1140-dynamo-application-framework-privileges-management-euvd-2026-47345/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 23:08:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability has been found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/oracle:commerce_platform">Oracle Commerce Platform 11.4.0</a> and classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">critical</a>. Impacted is an unknown function of the component <em>Dynamo Application Framework</em>. Performing a manipulation results in improper privilege management.

This vulnerability is known as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-61136">CVE-2026-61136</a>. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-61135 | Oracle Commerce Platform 11.4.0 Dynamo Application Framework Remote Code Execution (EUVD-2026-47344)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Oracle Commerce Platform 11.4.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component Dynamo Application Framework. Such manipulation leads to Remote Code Execution.

This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2026-61135. The attack ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690184/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-61135-oracle-commerce-platform-1140-dynamo-application-framework-remote-code-execution-euvd-2026-47344/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690184/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-61135-oracle-commerce-platform-1140-dynamo-application-framework-remote-code-execution-euvd-2026-47344/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 22:45:25 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability, which was classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">critical</a>, was found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/oracle:commerce_platform">Oracle Commerce Platform 11.4.0</a>. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component <em>Dynamo Application Framework</em>. Such manipulation leads to Remote Code Execution.

This vulnerability is traded as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-61135">CVE-2026-61135</a>. The attack may be launched remotely. There is no exploit available.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-61137 | Oracle Commerce Platform 11.4.0 Dynamo Application Framework Remote Code Execution (EUVD-2026-47346)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Oracle Commerce Platform 11.4.0. This affects an unknown part of the component Dynamo Application Framework. The manipulation results in Remote Code Execution.

This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2026-61137. The attack can be launched remotel...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690182/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-61137-oracle-commerce-platform-1140-dynamo-application-framework-remote-code-execution-euvd-2026-47346/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690182/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-61137-oracle-commerce-platform-1140-dynamo-application-framework-remote-code-execution-euvd-2026-47346/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 22:45:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">critical</a> was found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/oracle:commerce_platform">Oracle Commerce Platform 11.4.0</a>. This affects an unknown part of the component <em>Dynamo Application Framework</em>. The manipulation results in Remote Code Execution.

This vulnerability is reported as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-61137">CVE-2026-61137</a>. The attack can be launched remotely. No exploit exists.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Multi-turn attacks broke AI models 88% of the time — single-turn testing missed it, Cisco AI security lead warns at VB Transform 2026]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[When Cisco ran 6,986 multi-turn attacks against 15 flagship models, attackers who adapted across the conversation broke through as often as 88.3% of the time. Amy Chang, Cisco's head of AI threat intelligence and security research, brought that finding to the agentic security panel at VB Transfor...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690018/it-nachrichten/multi-turn-attacks-broke-ai-models-88-of-the-time-single-turn-testing-missed-it-cisco-ai-security-lead-warns-at-vb-transform-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690018/it-nachrichten/multi-turn-attacks-broke-ai-models-88-of-the-time-single-turn-testing-missed-it-cisco-ai-security-lead-warns-at-vb-transform-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:48:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Cisco ran 6,986 multi-turn attacks against <a href="https://blogs.cisco.com/ai/proprietary-problems">15 flagship models</a>, attackers who adapted across the conversation broke through as often as 88.3% of the time. Amy Chang, Cisco's head of AI threat intelligence and security research, brought that finding to the agentic security panel at <a href="https://venturebeat.com/vbtransform2026">VB Transform 2026</a>; the number should worry anyone still running single-turn red-teaming programs.</p><p><a href="https://venturebeat.com/resources/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials">VentureBeat's June 2026 Pulse survey of 107 enterprise respondents</a> explains why the room was full. More than half, 54%, have already had a confirmed agent security incident (18%) or a near-miss caught before harm (36%). Just 32% give every agent its own scoped, managed identity, and fewer still, 30%, isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes. Provider-native and hyperscaler controls remain the primary agent security layer at <a href="https://venturebeat.com/security/shared-api-keys-expose-ai-agent-fleets-venturebeat-research">82% of companies surveyed</a>. The world's largest security vendors have done the same math. </p><p>Palo Alto Networks closed its <a href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/company/press/2026/palo-alto-networks-completes-acquisition-of-cyberark-to-secure-the-ai-era">$25 billion acquisition of CyberArk</a> in February, CrowdStrike <a href="https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/press-releases/crowdstrike-to-acquire-sgnl-to-transform-identity-security-for-ai-era/">agreed in January to pay $740 million for SGNL</a>, and Cisco announced its <a href="https://blogs.cisco.com/news/cisco-announces-intent-to-acquire-astrix-security">intent to acquire Astrix Security</a> for a reported $400 million, all of it aimed at the identity and isolation layer most enterprises have not finished building.</p><div></div><p>Chang came to the panel with almost two decades of experience spanning cybersecurity operations, government, and the military. She ran global cybersecurity operations as an executive director at JPMorgan Chase, where she led the bank's cyber threat intelligence teams, and served as a senior staffer on the House Foreign Affairs Committee and as a U.S. Navy Reserve officer. She also teaches cybersecurity and emerging threats as adjunct faculty at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies.</p><p>Chang's 88.3% number comes from a study she co-authored with Nicholas Conley, built on 30,090 single-turn prompts and 6,986 multi-turn attacks against those 15 closed and proprietary flagship models. Multi-turn success rates ranged from 7.89% to 88.3%, every model tested showed non-trivial multi-turn exposure, and the two testing styles did not even rank the models in the same order. Cisco publishes adversarial evaluation signals for what is now 105 models on its <a href="https://leaderboard.aidefense.cisco.com/">LLM Security Leaderboard</a>, she told the audience.</p><p>"If you don't understand how models are susceptible to different types of attacks, then you are unable to account for how that model that is powering your agent, that is powering your application, to understand where those failure points are," Chang said. Single-turn testing is the one-shot malicious prompt, she explained, while extending an attack into a longer conversation "is more realistic of how we are actually engaging with our models, with our agents, with our applications." That longer arc surfaces harmful outputs and misaligned behaviors that a snapshot never catches.</p><p>Cisco has pushed the testing itself into agentic territory. Chang described a framework where agents assess a deployment scenario, develop relevant attacks, judge whether they are worth pursuing, execute them, and evaluate their own success. What surprised her most, after all that sophistication, was how simple the defensive answer stays. "The answer is still that it's pretty simple," she said. "You don't have to get super creative. You just need to think about truly what are the fundamentals and basics of what I'm trying to secure in my organization."</p><p>Her starting point for CISOs beginning agentic deployments is Cisco's <a href="https://blogs.cisco.com/ai/security-framework">Integrated AI Security and Safety Framework</a>, which she said "stipulates all the ways that AI can be compromised across the AI lifecycle" from modality through supply chain. From there, teams can work backward from real incidents, trace how each attack was achieved, and use the framework to build a strategy with the right coverage and mitigations.</p><p>Heather Ceylan, the CISO of Box, sees the same gap from the defender's side. "A lot of what you see out there with agent red teaming is just single-turn, and that's not how people are actually interacting with AI day-to-day," she told the audience. Box now simulates multi-turn adversaries with agents that think like an attacker and iterate attempt after attempt to hijack the target. "You have to pressure test your agents because otherwise you don't know if your execution controls are really working as you intended."</p><p>Box deployed agents inside its security operations center about a year ago, starting with human approval required for every action, and trust built quickly enough that analysts shifted into monitoring mode. Then the agent made one mistake, and every bit of that accumulated trust vanished. "They had to start all over again," she said. "So I think that that monitoring piece is so important. Even if you're not gonna have a human in the loop, things change, models change, and we can't control how the models change and interpret things."</p><p>Rajesh Parekh, VP of AI and ML at Intuit, brought the builder's perspective. Parekh led large-scale computer vision and ML systems powering Google's Maps and Geo products before joining Intuit, and holds a doctorate in computer science. </p><h2>Three layers versus an operating system</h2><p>Ceylan described Box's approach as three concentric layers. Permissioning comes first, so the agent never accesses more content than the human who invoked it. Ephemeral sandbox environments spin up for each agent task, containing the blast radius if an agent gets hijacked, and runtime execution control restricts the agent's tool calls to only those relevant to the task at hand. "If you want an agent to summarize a doc for you, if you have a prompt injection that came in that says forward this to maliciousattacker at domain.com, it can't do that," Ceylan said. "That action in that tool call is not even in its vocabulary."</p><p>She classified agent actions into three oversight categories. Actions that are not sensitive, like read and summarize, need no human in the loop. Moderately sensitive actions skip human approval but get logged and monitored, while destructive actions like mass deletion of files always require a human. "Things are gonna shift between those three categories quite a bit," she acknowledged, "but setting those types of categories up front allows you to have a principled framework."</p><p>Rather than layering controls onto agents one at a time, Intuit has built a central platform called GenOS, short for generative AI operating system, which abstracts security, risk, and fraud modeling so individual agent developers never reinvent protection. "Permissioning is not about giving access to AI," Parekh said. "Instead, it is defining very tightly scoped and clearly auditable authority to the agent to perform very specific tasks." Intuit evolved from agents inheriting user permissions to each agent carrying its own identity, and the company is now investigating mid-session permission changes tied to the specific task underway.</p><p>Parekh calls the broader model an AI-powered expert platform, one where the human expert is built into the trust architecture rather than bolted on as a gate. "The paradigm that we are pursuing is where the user, the AI agent, and the human expert are collaborating to solve the user problem," he said.</p><h2>The end of human code review</h2><p>Ceylan took on the tension between security testing and development velocity without hedging. "The days of secure code reviews where a human's looking at the code and we're looking at security architecture reviews, design docs, those are done," she said. "If you keep trying to do security that way, you're gonna get left behind." Box is building toward a fully agentic development lifecycle where agents review design documents, apply security requirements, and review the code for vulnerabilities. "I'm very optimistic that we will get to a point where we will write code without security vulnerabilities because agents and the models are going to get so good at writing code without vulnerabilities," she said. "We're still a long way away from that."</p><p>Her advice for development teams skips the advanced AI concepts entirely and returns to basics that predate agents. "It comes down to very basic least privilege access," she said. "If you start giving your agents overly broad permissions at the beginning, it's really hard to comb that back and build an infrastructure that allows for those ephemeral credentials and only those narrowly scoped tasks."</p><p>Parekh explained why the red teaming surface has expanded so quickly. "These agents have skills, and skills could become vulnerabilities," he said. "Agents have access to certain data, they have access to tools, and there could be threats that are lurking within those tools as well. So suddenly the blast radius of the malicious code or the intent increases dramatically." When Intuit identifies common vulnerability patterns from its manual red teaming exercises, it automates those tests back into the GenOS harness so future agents inherit protection and red teamers stay focused on new threat vectors. Runtime scanning of prompts and responses adds a final layer that can stop a suspect response and escalate to a human expert, he said.</p><p>"You need to continuously test to ensure that those remain robust to the protections that you have built, as well as to account for any sort of drift or any other types of dependencies that you introduce into your scenario that can create novel vulnerabilities," she said.</p><h2>Intent versus probability</h2><p>An audience question about intent detection set off the sharpest exchange of the session. Ceylan noted that when Box's own agent operates, the system always knows the user's intent because it controls the prompt, which means guardrails and tool-call restrictions can be engineered around it. The harder challenge, which she admitted Box is still trying to solve, arrives when external agents connect and the context behind the request is opaque.</p><p>That exchange exposed a split running through the wider industry. Mastercard, in the fireside chat immediately preceding the panel, came down on the side of quantifying intent, building an open-source framework to propagate it as a standard because complex B2B procurement cannot work without that trust. Endpoint security CTOs, in briefings with VentureBeat, have gone the other way, saying they will bet on probability rather than intent inference for production workloads. Chang explained why models, as they are trained today, cannot reliably derive intent from a prompt, which is why deterministic controls and behavioral proxies remain necessary. Ceylan agreed that both are required. "If you're not doing anything deterministic, you're really relying heavily on that intent, and I haven't seen programs that are there yet," she said.</p><p>Ceylan's story about trust collapsing after a single agent mistake landed as the panel's most memorable moment because enterprise agentic security is not a problem that gets solved and stays solved. Models change, permissions drift, and adversaries adapt across multi-turn conversations that snapshot tests never capture.</p><p>For the 82% of enterprises relying on provider-native controls as their primary security layer, and the 59% shopping for agent security tooling over the next 12 months, the panel's takeaway was blunt. Test the way attackers attack, across full conversations and continuously, or find out in production what your single-turn red teaming missed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-24216 | NVIDIA BioNeMo Framework on Linux deserialization]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in NVIDIA BioNeMo Framework on Linux. It has been declared as critical. Impacted is an unknown function. Executing a manipulation can lead to deserialization.

This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2026-24216. The attack needs to be launched locally. No exploit is avai...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689994/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-24216-nvidia-bionemo-framework-on-linux-deserialization/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689994/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-24216-nvidia-bionemo-framework-on-linux-deserialization/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:32:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/nvidia:bionemo_framework">NVIDIA BioNeMo Framework</a> on Linux. It has been declared as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">critical</a>. Impacted is an unknown function. Executing a manipulation can lead to deserialization.

This vulnerability is registered as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-24216">CVE-2026-24216</a>. The attack needs to be launched locally. No exploit is available.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-24217 | NVIDIA BioNeMo Framework on Linux File path traversal]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in NVIDIA BioNeMo Framework on Linux. It has been rated as very critical. The affected element is an unknown function of the component File Handler. The manipulation leads to path traversal: '\..\filename'.

This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2026-24217. The attack ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689993/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-24217-nvidia-bionemo-framework-on-linux-file-path-traversal/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689993/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-24217-nvidia-bionemo-framework-on-linux-file-path-traversal/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:32:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/nvidia:bionemo_framework">NVIDIA BioNeMo Framework</a> on Linux. It has been rated as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">very critical</a>. The affected element is an unknown function of the component <em>File Handler</em>. The manipulation leads to path traversal: '\..\filename'.

This vulnerability is documented as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-24217">CVE-2026-24217</a>. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is not any exploit available.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Agentic orchestration: Enterprise AI organizations have a deployment problem, not a platform problem — and most are calling chatbots agents]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 101 enterprises, agent orchestration is consolidating onto model-provider platforms — Anthropic’s Claude leads by a wide margin — chosen for the gravity of the underlying model and judged on reliable multi-step execution. But the ambition runs well ahead of the reality: most deployed “agen...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689830/it-nachrichten/agentic-orchestration-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-deployment-problem-not-a-platform-problem-and-most-are-calling-chatbots-agents/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689830/it-nachrichten/agentic-orchestration-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-deployment-problem-not-a-platform-problem-and-most-are-calling-chatbots-agents/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 101 enterprises, agent orchestration is consolidating onto model-provider platforms — Anthropic’s Claude leads by a wide margin — chosen for the gravity of the underlying model and judged on reliable multi-step execution. But the ambition runs well ahead of the reality: most deployed “agents” are still chatbot wrappers, the control plane enterprises expect is deliberately hybrid to avoid lock-in, and real-time fiscal control over token burn remains the exception.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines enterprise agent orchestration: which platforms enterprises run on, what drives the choice, what they optimize for, how they expect agent control to be structured, and — most revealingly — how orchestrated their deployed “agents” actually are and how tightly they control the cost of running them.</p><p>The central finding is a gap between orchestration ambition and orchestration reality. Enterprises are consolidating fast onto the major model platforms: Anthropic’s Claude is the primary platform for 40%, more than double any rival, followed by Microsoft (18%) and OpenAI (13%). The choice is driven by “model gravity” — native alignment with a state-of-the-art base model (21%) — and success is judged by reliable, multi-step execution (task completion reliability 32%, multi-step workflow management 28%). Yet asked to assess their portfolios honestly, 71% say a quarter or fewer of their deployed “agents” are true multi-step orchestrated workflows rather than single-prompt chatbot wrappers, and only 10% have crossed the halfway mark. The orchestration layer is being built well ahead of the orchestrated portfolio it is meant to run.</p><p>That gap shapes the architecture enterprises are putting in place. By the end of 2026 a clear majority (51%) expect a hybrid control plane — provider-native plus external orchestration — and only 6% expect to hand control to a provider-managed service, because vendor lock-in (35%) is the risk they fear most if control lives inside a model provider. Investment follows the build-out: agent workflow tooling leads the spend (34%), with security and permissions enforcement (25%) behind. And fiscal control lags throughout — more than a quarter (27%) have no real-time way to stop a runaway agent before the bill arrives.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this instrument focused on enterprise agent orchestration. Responses are filtered to organizations with 100 or more employees (n=101), drawn from a single June 2026 wave; because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends.</p><p>By organization size the sample is spread evenly across the enterprise bands: 100–499 employees, 2,500–9,999, and 50,000+ (21% each), with 10,000–49,999 and 500–2,499 (19% each). By role it is senior and buyer-credible: product and program managers (15%), CIO/CTO/CISO (13%), consultants and advisors (13%), and a spread of data, AI, and engineering directors and VPs, with an “Other” function at 18%. On purchasing, 81% are recommenders, influencers, or final decision-makers for AI solutions (66% recommender/influencer, 15% final decision-maker). Technology/Software is the largest industry at 44%, followed by Financial Services (17%) and Healthcare/Life Sciences (8%).</p><p>At 101 respondents the sample is robust enough to read directionally with reasonable confidence, though it remains self-selected and is not a probability sample.</p><h2>Finding 1: Orchestration runs on model-provider platforms</h2><p><b>Anthropic’s Claude leads; open frameworks are marginal</b></p><p>We asked which agent orchestration platform enterprises primarily use today. The answer concentrates on the major model providers — and on one in particular.</p><div></div><p>A note on reading these shares. As described in the methodology section, the respondents are self-selected, and this question asked them for a single primary platform — so the figures measure which platform leads each enterprise's deployment, within a self-selected audience of AI-active technical decision-makers. A sample built this way can diverge substantially from spend-weighted market measures, and each VB Pulse survey draws its own sample with its own company-size mix, so vendor figures should not be compared across our surveys either. Read these shares as a portrait of where this cohort has placed its primary orchestration bet today, rather than as market share.</p><p>The model platforms dominate. Anthropic, Microsoft, OpenAI, Google, and Amazon together account for roughly 80% of deployments (81 of 101), while the open frameworks (LangChain/LangGraph) and custom in-house builds that anchor engineering discussion sit in single digits. Anthropic’s lead — 40%, more than double the next platform — mirrors the “model gravity” selection logic in Finding 2: enterprises are choosing the orchestration layer that comes with the model they want to build on. As with the security vendors in the prior agent-security wave, the tools that define the category in technical circles are not yet where enterprise deployment concentrates. A small 3% are not orchestrating at all.</p><p>Respondents rate the platforms they run at 3.94 out of 5 overall (109 answered), with “value for money” specifically at 3.94 and “ease of implementation” the weakest score, at 3.85 — placing orchestration near the bottom of our five-tracker satisfaction range, ahead of only evaluation tooling. A rating just under 4 out of 5, from users of whom 96% plan to change their orchestration approach within the year, reads as provisional acceptance: the platforms work well enough to run today, and not well enough to stop the search for something better. The ratings sit alongside near-universal intent to change; this is a layer enterprises tolerate more than they love.</p><h2>Finding 2: Model gravity drives platform selection</h2><p><b>The base model, not the tooling, decides the platform</b></p><p>We asked what most influenced the orchestration platform choice. The single largest factor is the pull of the underlying model — though flexibility and ease of development follow close behind.</p><div></div><p>Model gravity leading is the selection-side explanation for Anthropic’s platform lead: enterprises pick the orchestration environment closest to the frontier model they have standardized on. But the next tier complicates the picture — flexibility across models and tools (17%) and ease of development (17%) say enterprises also want to avoid being trapped by that choice, foreshadowing the lock-in fear in Finding 6. Security and permissions (14%) and total cost of ownership (11%) round out a pragmatic buying logic. Performance (latency/memory) sits last at 4%, a reminder that at this stage of adoption the binding constraints are model fit and optionality, not raw speed.</p><h2>Finding 3: The job is reliable multi-step execution</h2><p><b>Enterprises just orchestration by whether it completes the work</b></p><p>We asked what enterprises optimize for — their primary success metric for orchestration. Reliability and multi-step workflow management dominate; developer- and user-facing metrics trail.</p><div></div><p>Task completion reliability (32%) and multi-step workflow management (28%) together account for 59% of responses (60 of 101): orchestration succeeds, in the enterprise view, when it reliably carries a task through multiple steps to completion. Developer productivity (17%) matters but is secondary — the inverse of its prominence in framework discussion — and end-user experience (9%) is a minor concern, consistent with orchestration being an internal execution problem rather than a UX one. This reliability-first standard is exactly what makes the Chatbot Trap finding so pointed: enterprises define success as dependable multi-step execution, yet most of their deployed “agents” do not yet do multi-step work at all.</p><p>The trap is not evenly distributed. Splitting the sample by organization size, 77% of smaller enterprises say a quarter or fewer of their agents do true multi-step work, against 62% of larger ones. Larger enterprises are meaningfully further into genuine multi-step deployment; the chatbot trap is, directionally, a mid-market condition.</p><h2>Finding 4: Consolidate, productionize, and build in-house </h2><p><b>Three strategic moves are nearly tied for the year ahead</b></p><p>We asked what major change enterprises anticipate in their orchestration strategy over the next 12 months. Three moves cluster at the top, almost evenly split.</p><div></div><p>The top three — building in-house control (25%), standardizing on one framework (24%), and moving agents from sandbox to production (23%) — are statistically indistinguishable and tell a single story: enterprises are moving from experimentation to operational consolidation. They want fewer frameworks, more production exposure, and more ownership of the control layer; only 4% expect no change. The appetite for custom in-house control planes is notable alongside the platform concentration in Finding 1 — enterprises are standardizing on model-provider platforms while simultaneously planning to wrap them in control logic they own, the hybrid posture that Finding 6 makes explicit.</p><h2>Finding 5: Nearly seven in 10 plan to switch — and the biggest group of movers has no shortlist </h2><p>The strategic change enterprises anticipate (previous finding) comes with vendor motion attached. Asked whether they plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent orchestration platform in the next twelve months, more respondents are moving here than in any other layer we track.</p><div></div><p>Asked which platforms they are considering, the most common answer among those in motion is none yet: 29% of all respondents are evaluating without a shortlist, the largest single response after "not considering a change." Among named candidates, OpenAI leads at 16%, followed by LangChain/LangGraph at 12% and Anthropic at 7% — and notably, the independent frameworks draw roughly double their current usage footprint in forward consideration, the same pattern our security tracker found for specialist vendors. Read with this report's concentration and lock-in findings, the picture completes itself: the major model-platform providers hold roughly four-fifths of today's primary usage, vendor lock-in has become the leading fear, 96% anticipate a strategic change — and now the purchase intent to act on all of it, with the largest bloc of buyers still undecided. The most concentrated layer of the agentic stack is also, as of June, the least settled.</p><h2>Finding 6: Investment flows to workflow tooling</h2><p><b>Tooling and permissions lead the spend; monitoring trails</b></p><p>We asked which orchestration-related investment will grow most next year. Agent workflow tooling leads, with security and permissions enforcement behind.</p><div></div><p>Workflow tooling leading (34%) is the budget-side expression of the reliability-and-multi-step priority in Finding 3: the money is going to the machinery that strings steps together dependably. Security and permissions enforcement (25%) and scaling infrastructure (20%) follow — the investments required to take agents from sandbox into production, the strategic move in Finding 4. Monitoring and debugging draws a smaller 11%, with another 11% reporting flat budgets. The weight on tooling, permissions, and scaling over pure observability signals that enterprises are spending to build and harden orchestration, not merely to watch it run.</p><h2>Finding 7: The control plane will be hybrid — and lock-in is why</h2><p><b>Enterprises expect to split control between providers and their own layer</b></p><p>We asked where enterprises expect the primary control plane for agents to live by the end of 2026, and what worries them most if that control sits inside a model-provider platform. A clear majority expect a hybrid model — and vendor lock-in is the reason.</p><div></div><p>Hybrid control is the dominant expectation by a wide margin (51%), and only 6% expect to hand control to a provider-managed service outright. Read together, the hybrid, custom, and externally-abstracted options — every architecture that keeps control at least partly outside the provider — sum to 88% (89 of 101). The reason surfaces directly when we asked about the risk of provider-resident control: vendor lock-in leads at 35% (35 of 101), ahead of security and permissioning limitations (28%) and inflexibility across models and tools (21%). The pattern echoes the prior wave’s “don’t trust the model to police itself” posture — here, enterprises will build on a provider’s platform but decline to be governed entirely by it. The hybrid control plane is the architectural hedge against the lock-in they most fear.</p><p>The June figure asserting a preference for a hybrid control plane marks movement from earlier. In the April–May survey (n=145), only 34% expected a hybrid control plane, and a greater number (12%) expected to hand control fully to a provider-managed service. These two snapshots don’t yet measure a confirmed longitudinal trend — but the direction of the conversation is unambiguous: toward keeping control.</p><p>Lock-in is also a new arrival as a top concern. In the April–May wave, the leading concern was security and permissioning limitations (32%), with lock-in second at 24%; by June the two had traded places. The worry about provider platforms appears to be maturing from whether they can be secured to whether they can be replaced.</p><h2>Finding 8: The chatbot trap — most “agents” aren’t agents yet</h2><p><b>Enterprises admit most deployments are still chatbot wrappers</b></p><p>We asked enterprises to assess their portfolios honestly: what share of their deployed “agents” are true multi-step orchestrated workflows versus simple single-prompt chatbot wrappers. The answer is the defining finding of this wave.</p><div></div><p>This is the gap at the center of the report. Combining the bottom two bands, 71% of enterprises (72 of 101) say a quarter or fewer of their deployed “agents” are genuinely orchestrated — and just 10% (10 of 101) have crossed the halfway mark. The ambition documented in the earlier findings — model-provider platforms, reliability-first success metrics, production rollouts, a deliberate control architecture — runs well ahead of the deployed reality, which remains overwhelmingly single-prompt assistants dressed as agents. This is less a contradiction than a roadmap: the platforms, budgets, and strategies are being put in place precisely because the orchestrated portfolio is still so thin. The open question for later waves is how fast the reality closes on the ambition.</p><h2>Finding 9: Fiscal control is still reactive</h2><p><b>Only a minority can stop a runaway agent before the bill arrives</b></p><p>Finally, we asked how enterprises enforce fiscal control over agent token consumption — the risk that an autonomous loop exhausts a budget before anyone intervenes. Most rely on native caps or after-the-fact monitoring; real-time programmatic control is the exception.</p><div></div><p>More than a quarter of enterprises (27%) admit they have no real-time, programmatic way to stop an agent before a budget-breaking bill arrives — they learn of it from the logs afterward. Another 32% lean entirely on the native caps and throttles built into their primary platform, a control only as good as the provider’s tooling and one that ties back to the lock-in concern of Finding 6. The enterprises building custom gateways (23%) or exploiting cross-model routing to arbitrage cost (19%) are the ones treating token burn as an engineering problem to be controlled deterministically. As with orchestration maturity, fiscal control is an area where the operational reality lags the ambition: agents are moving toward production faster than the cost-control plane around them is being built.</p><p>It’s worth noting, a split appears according to company size: roughly one in three enterprises under 2,500 employees (34%) exercises only reactive control of agent spend, against 20% of larger enterprises — directional figures, but consistent with the chatbot-trap split. The mid-market is running the least mature agents on the least instrumented budgets.</p><h2>The bottom line: The layer is real; most of the agents aren't yet</h2><p>Organizations with 100 or more employees describe an orchestration strategy that is consolidating quickly and maturing slowly. They are standardizing — for now — on model-provider platforms, which collectively hold roughly four-fifths of primary usage, chosen for the gravity of the underlying model, and they judge success by reliable multi-step execution. Investment is flowing to workflow tooling and permissions, the strategy is to consolidate frameworks and push agents into production, and the control plane they expect is deliberately hybrid, because vendor lock-in is the risk they fear most. But the standardization is provisional: 68% plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement orchestration platform within twelve months — the highest switching intent of any layer we track — and the largest group of those movers has not yet shortlisted a candidate. Today's concentration describes where enterprises are, and visibly does not describe where they intend to stay.</p><p>But the honest self-assessment punctures the ambition. Seventy-one percent say a quarter or fewer of their deployed "agents" are truly orchestrated, only 10% are past the halfway mark, and more than a quarter cannot stop a runaway agent in real time. The orchestration layer — the platforms, the budgets, the control architecture — is being built ahead of the orchestrated portfolio it is meant to run. At 101 respondents in a single June wave this reads as a clear directional signal rather than a precise measurement: enterprises have decided how they want to orchestrate agents well before most of their agents are doing anything an orchestration layer is for. The questions for subsequent waves are whether the deployed reality closes the gap on the ambition — and, with nearly seven in ten buyers in motion and most of them undecided, which platforms the settled stack finally lands on.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 101 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, results read directionally rather than as a confirmed trend. Respondents include product and program managers, CIOs, CTOs and CISOs, consultants and advisors, and directors and VPs of data, AI, and engineering, across Technology/Software, Financial Services, Healthcare, and other sectors.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Mapping PCI DSS v4.0.1 to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The PCI Security Standards Council (PCI SSC) has published a document which maps the PCI Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) v4.0.1 to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0. With both organizations sharing the common goal to enhance data security...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689766/it-security-nachrichten/mapping-pci-dss-v401-to-the-nist-cybersecurity-framework-20/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689766/it-security-nachrichten/mapping-pci-dss-v401-to-the-nist-cybersecurity-framework-20/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:00:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="hs-featured-image-wrapper"> 
 <a href="https://blog.pcisecuritystandards.org/mapping-pci-dss-v4.0.1-to-the-nist-cybersecurity-framework-2.0" title="" class="hs-featured-image-link"> <img src="https://blog.pcisecuritystandards.org/hubfs/2026-blog/pci-nist-blog_new.jpg" alt="Mapping PCI DSS v4.0.1 to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0" class="hs-featured-image"> </a> 
</div> 
<br> 
<p>The PCI Security Standards Council (PCI SSC) has published a document which maps the PCI Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) v4.0.1 to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0. With both organizations sharing the common goal to enhance data security, this document provides a resource for stakeholders to use in understanding how to align security efforts to meet objectives in both PCI DSS and the NIST CSF.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Next.js Patches Nine Security Flaws Enabling SSRF, Authentication Bypass, and DoS Attacks]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Vercel has disclosed and patched nine security vulnerabilities in Next.js, the widely used React framework, addressing flaws that could enable server-side request forgery (SSRF), middleware authentication bypass, denial-of-service (DoS) attacks, and sensitive data exposure. All nine advisories we...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689715/it-security-nachrichten/nextjs-patches-nine-security-flaws-enabling-ssrf-authentication-bypass-and-dos-attacks/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689715/it-security-nachrichten/nextjs-patches-nine-security-flaws-enabling-ssrf-authentication-bypass-and-dos-attacks/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:44:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vercel has disclosed and patched nine security vulnerabilities in Next.js, the widely used React framework, addressing flaws that could enable server-side request forgery (SSRF), middleware authentication bypass, denial-of-service (DoS) attacks, and sensitive data exposure. All nine advisories were published two…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/next-js-patches-nine-security-flaws-enabling-ssrf-authentication-bypass-and-dos-attacks/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/next-js-patches-nine-security-flaws-enabling-ssrf-authentication-bypass-and-dos-attacks/">Next.js Patches Nine Security Flaws Enabling SSRF, Authentication Bypass, and DoS Attacks</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[EU’s ‘Chat Control 1.0’ Revived, Rekindling Privacy and Surveillance Fears]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[  The European Union has reignited a fierce debate over privacy and surveillance with the revival of its so‑called “Chat Control 1.0” framework. The measure restores a legal basis for major technology companies to voluntarily scan users’ private communications for…
Read more →
The post EU’s ‘Chat...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689706/it-security-nachrichten/eus-chat-control-10-revived-rekindling-privacy-and-surveillance-fears/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689706/it-security-nachrichten/eus-chat-control-10-revived-rekindling-privacy-and-surveillance-fears/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:43:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>  The European Union has reignited a fierce debate over privacy and surveillance with the revival of its so‑called “Chat Control 1.0” framework. The measure restores a legal basis for major technology companies to voluntarily scan users’ private communications for…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/eus-chat-control-1-0-revived-rekindling-privacy-and-surveillance-fears/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/eus-chat-control-1-0-revived-rekindling-privacy-and-surveillance-fears/">EU’s ‘Chat Control 1.0’ Revived, Rekindling Privacy and Surveillance Fears</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The RAM crisis just forced Framework into a nasty price hike — and Apple's rumored solution to the memory crunch is renting Macs to cash-strapped consumers]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple's plan to sidestep the RAM crisis could be renting Macs, iPhones and iPads to consumers.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689696/it-nachrichten/the-ram-crisis-just-forced-framework-into-a-nasty-price-hike-and-apples-rumored-solution-to-the-memory-crunch-is-renting-macs-to-cash-strapped-consumers/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689696/it-nachrichten/the-ram-crisis-just-forced-framework-into-a-nasty-price-hike-and-apples-rumored-solution-to-the-memory-crunch-is-renting-macs-to-cash-strapped-consumers/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:35:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple's plan to sidestep the RAM crisis could be renting Macs, iPhones and iPads to consumers.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Russian State-Supported Cyber Actors Conduct Phishing Campaign Targeting Users of Zimbra Collaboration Suite]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Russian State-Supported Cyber Actors Conduct Phishing Campaign Targeting Users of Zimbra Collaboration Suite
Executive summary 
A group of Russian state-supported cyber actors has been targeting and compromising various Western government and commercial organizations using the Zimbra Collaboratio...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689407/sicherheitsluecken/russian-state-supported-cyber-actors-conduct-phishing-campaign-targeting-users-of-zimbra-collaboration-suite/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689407/sicherheitsluecken/russian-state-supported-cyber-actors-conduct-phishing-campaign-targeting-users-of-zimbra-collaboration-suite/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:59:29 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="c-page-title__buttons"><a class="c-button" href="https://media.defense.gov/2026/Jul/22/2003965244/-1/-1/1/CSA_RUSSIA_PHISHING_TARGET_ZIMBRA.PDF">Russian State-Supported Cyber Actors Conduct Phishing Campaign Targeting Users of Zimbra Collaboration Suite</a></div>
<h2><strong>Executive summary</strong> </h2>
<p>A group of Russian state-supported cyber actors has been targeting and compromising various Western government and commercial organizations using the Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) software since at least July 2025. The Russian state-supported advanced persistent threat (APT) group’s activity is tracked in the cybersecurity community under several names (see <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#cyber1">Cybersecurity industry tracking</a>), primarily as “LAUNDRY BEAR,” a name initially coined by the Netherlands General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD) and Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD) [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc1">1</a>].</p>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR’s targeting is almost certainly to gather sensitive information for the Russian Federation, with these actors primarily focusing on the covert acquisition of email data. Previous campaigns indicated LAUNDRY BEAR relied on unsophisticated initial access techniques—including password spraying, phishing, and pass-the-cookie—allowing the group to successfully run high-volume operations. The latest campaign targeting ZCS uses a novel exploit that was a zero-day vulnerability when first exploited and continues to be successfully exploited. The vulnerability, Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a>, was patched in November 2025. This demonstrates LAUNDRY BEAR’s intent and ability to deploy increasingly sophisticated technical capabilities.</p>
<p>Unlike traditional phishing campaigns that persuade a user into taking an action, such as clicking a link or opening a file, LAUNDRY BEAR’s latest campaign leverages a view-based exploit that only requires a user to view a malicious email within a vulnerable version of the webmail service. Once viewed, the exploit attempts to exfiltrate the victim’s last 90 days of email communications, the organization email directory (i.e., Global Address List [GAL]), and other sensitive information to servers controlled by LAUNDRY BEAR. The exploit also attempts to establish persistent access to victim accounts through a variety of means as detailed in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#persistence1">Persistence and credential access</a> section.</p>
<p>This Cybersecurity Advisory (CSA) warns of this ongoing malicious threat activity and urges organizations to update their vulnerable software and implement additional mitigations to thwart these Russian state-supported actors’ continued success. The CSA is being released by the following authoring and co-sealing agencies:</p>
<ul>
<li>United States National Security Agency (NSA)</li>
<li>United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)</li>
<li>Netherlands Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD)</li>
<li>Netherlands General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD)</li>
<li>United States Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)</li>
<li>United States Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA)</li>
<li>United States Department of Defense Cyber Crime Center (DC3)</li>
<li>United States Department of the Treasury</li>
<li>United States Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS)</li>
<li>Australian Signals Directorate’s Australian Cyber Security Centre (ASD’s ACSC)</li>
<li>Communications Security Establishment Canada’s (CSE’s) Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (Cyber Centre)</li>
<li>New Zealand National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-NZ)</li>
<li>United Kingdom National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-UK)</li>
<li>Czech Republic National Cyber and Information Security Agency (NÚKIB)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f1"><sup>1</sup></a></li>
<li>Danish Defence Intelligence Service (DDIS)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f2"><sup>2</sup></a></li>
<li>Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service (EFIS)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f3"><sup>3</sup></a></li>
<li>Finnish Defence Intelligence (FDI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f4"><sup>4</sup></a></li>
<li>Finnish Security and Intelligence Service (SUPO)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f5"><sup>5</sup></a></li>
<li>French General Directorate for Internal Security (DGSI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f6"><sup>6</sup></a></li>
<li>French National Cybersecurity Agency (ANSSI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f7"><sup>7</sup></a></li>
<li>Italian External Intelligence and Security Agency (AISE)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f8"><sup>8</sup></a></li>
<li>Italian Internal Intelligence and Security Agency (AISI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f9"><sup>9</sup></a></li>
<li>Security and Intelligence Service of the Republic of Moldova (SIS RM)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f10"><sup>10</sup></a></li>
<li>Polish Foreign Intelligence Agency (AW)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f11"><sup>11</sup></a></li>
<li>The Military Counterintelligence Service of Poland (SKW)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f12"><sup>12</sup></a></li>
<li>Spain National Intelligence Centre (CNI)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f13"><sup>13</sup></a></li>
<li>Sweden National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-SE)<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f14"><sup>14</sup></a></li>
</ul>
<p>The authoring agencies urge any organizations using ZCS to implement the recommendations listed within the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#mitigations1">Mitigations</a> section of this advisory to reduce the risk associated with this activity. This CSA also includes specific remediations for organizations to implement if they discover the presence of the listed <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#ioc1">Indicators of compromise</a> (IOCs).  </p>
<p>As more organizations update their ZCS software based on this CSA, LAUNDRY BEAR may discontinue the current campaign exploiting this vulnerability; however, based on the success of this and previous campaigns, it is very likely that the group will continue to target ZCS and other email systems used by organizations in Western countries. The actors will almost certainly continue to rely on email to engage potential victims by exploiting novel vulnerabilities and, when necessary, use social engineering techniques to assist with their efforts. The authoring agencies recommend organizations regularly update their mail service software and continuously monitor their email systems and emails for malicious activity.</p>
<p>For a downloadable list of IOCs, see:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-07/AA26-204A.stix_.xml">AA26-204A.stix.xml</a> (STIX XML)</li>
<li><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2026-07/AA26-204A.stix_.json">AA26-204A.stix.json</a> (STIX JSON)</li>
</ul>
<h2><strong>Cybersecurity industry tracking</strong><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h2>
<p>The cybersecurity industry provides overlapping cyber threat intelligence, indicators of compromise (IOCs), and mitigation recommendations related to these Russian state-supported cyber actors. While not exhaustive, the following are threat group names commonly used for these actors within the cybersecurity community:</p>
<ul>
<li>LAUNDRY BEAR</li>
<li>Void Blizzard [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc2">2</a>]</li>
<li>CL-STA-1114 [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc3">3</a>]</li>
<li>TA488 (formerly UNK_PitStop) [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc4">4</a>]</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> Cybersecurity companies have different methods of tracking and attributing cyber actors, and this may not be a 1:1 correlation to the U.S. government’s understanding for all activity related to these groupings.</p>
<h2><strong>Background</strong></h2>
<p>Public advisories from Netherlands General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD), Netherlands Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD), and Microsoft highlighted these Russian state-supported advanced persistent threat (APT) actors in May 2025, calling them LAUNDRY BEAR and Void Blizzard respectively [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc1">1</a>] [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc2">2</a>]. Both advisories assessed that the group was engaged in malicious cyber activity as early as April 2024.  </p>
<p>The May 2025 advisories highlighted a cluster of activity targeting cloud-based email environments, including Microsoft Exchange in particular, and abusing legitimate APIs to perform data exfiltration in bulk [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1114/002/" target="_blank">T1114.002</a>]. The group relied on unsophisticated means of initial access, including procuring stolen credentials on criminal marketplaces [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1078/" target="_blank">T1078</a>], and using social engineering techniques to lure targets into interacting with a malicious site masquerading as a legitimate one. As of April 2025, one of these sites resembled a European Defence &amp; Security Summit registration portal that required registrants to sign in to their Microsoft account to view. Once a user entered their Microsoft credentials into this malicious site, LAUNDRY BEAR’s modified version of the open source adversary emulation toolkit, Evilginx, intercepted the user’s credentials. LAUNDRY BEAR then used this authentication data, including passwords and session tokens, to access the compromised account and conduct mass email exfiltration, as well as harvest other information. This method of compromise is commonly known as an adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) technique [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1557/" target="_blank">T1557</a>].  </p>
<p>Beginning around July 2025, LAUNDRY BEAR shifted toward a more technical method of email compromise, highlighting their continued efforts to covertly acquire email communications from a variety of Western organizations of interest and deliver them to the Russian Federation. Using a custom-developed capability [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/001/" target="_blank">T1587.001</a>] named “<em>Улей</em>” or “<em>Ulej</em>” (Russian for beehive), LAUNDRY BEAR successfully targeted and exfiltrated sensitive user information from organizations who use the Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) product [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1114/" target="_blank">T1114</a>]. Data LAUNDRY BEAR attempted to exfiltrate from compromised accounts included:</p>
<ul>
<li>Last 90 days of emails,</li>
<li>Email address,</li>
<li>Password [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1589/001/" target="_blank">T1589.001</a>],</li>
<li>Global Address List (GAL) [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1087/" target="_blank">T1087</a>],</li>
<li>Two-factor authentication (2FA) tokens, and</li>
<li>Newly-created Application Passcode [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1098/" target="_blank">T1098</a>].</li>
</ul>
<p>The covert and persistent nature of this activity, along with the absence of any known financial extortion, almost certainly indicates this group’s involvement in espionage activities with Russian government backing. Additionally, extensive Ukrainian targeting, prior to use against U.S. and other NATO allies, outlines an increasing trend within Russian cyber threat groups to target Ukrainian users first—both as a priority target and as a testbench for malicious cyber techniques before broader global deployment.</p>
<h2><strong>Targeting details</strong></h2>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR has targeted and compromised users in various organizations, including those associated with:</p>
<ul>
<li>the Defense Industrial Base (DIB),  </li>
<li>the federal and local government,</li>
<li>education,</li>
<li>energy,</li>
<li>law enforcement,  </li>
<li>media,  </li>
<li>non-governmental organizations, and</li>
<li>technology.</li>
</ul>
<h2><strong>Technical details</strong></h2>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> This advisory uses the <a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/matrices/enterprise/" target="_blank">MITRE ATT&amp;CK® Matrix for Enterprise</a> framework, version 19. This advisory also uses <a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/" target="_blank">MITRE D3FEND<sup>TM</sup></a> version 1.4.0<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#f15"><sup>15</sup></a>. See <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#appendixa">Appendix A</a> and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#appendixb">Appendix B</a> for tables of the activity mapped to MITRE ATT&amp;CK and D3FEND tactics, techniques, and countermeasures.</p>
<p><em>Ulej </em>is a novel data exfiltration and aggregation capability, that currently (as of the publication of this report) supports a campaign specifically targeting users of ZCS webmail servers. This capability is used to exploit <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a> [Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html" target="_blank">CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting'</a>)], but likely could be adapted to exploit other vulnerabilities. It exfiltrates emails and other sensitive user data from a victim’s system immediately after exploitation and stores the data in an actor-controlled unattributable virtual private server (VPS) [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1074/002/" target="_blank">T1074.002</a>] running LAUNDRY BEAR’s “Flowerbed” collection framework. The collected data is almost certainly further exfiltrated to internal network resources for review and long-term retention.</p>
<h3><em><strong>Reconnaissance</strong></em></h3>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR uses the <em>Ulej </em>capability to exploit the <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a> vulnerability in organizations using ZCS. This campaign’s targeted victimology and limited exploitation capabilities likely indicate this group manually identifies and targets the victim organizations. LAUNDRY BEAR likely identifies organizations with public-facing Zimbra infrastructure by port scanning [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1595/" target="_blank">T1595</a>] and fingerprinting datasets easily procured through various commercial vendors [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1596/005/" target="_blank">T1596.005</a>].  </p>
<p>After identifying a target organization, the group likely compiles email addresses for individual users to target with the exploit [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1589/002/" target="_blank">T1589.002</a>] from datasets offered by commercial vendors [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1597/002/" target="_blank">T1597.002</a>], open source intelligence [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1593/" target="_blank">T1593</a>], or previously exfiltrated data [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1597/" target="_blank">T1597</a>].  </p>
<h3><em><strong>Resource development </strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<p>The actors procure VPSs from a variety of providers [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1583/003/" target="_blank">T1583.003</a>], including those with Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements, and often use fabricated identities. LAUNDRY BEAR primarily uses Mullvad VPN [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1583/">T1583</a>] when interacting with these servers, further demonstrating the group’s intent to mask their identity and maintain operations security (OPSEC). After the server is provisioned, an automated process deploys the Docker containers necessary for <em>Ulej’s</em> Flowerbed framework [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1608/">T1608</a>], which then receives and aggregates the data <em>Ulej</em> exfiltrates. These servers are typically only used for 7-60 days before moving to new infrastructure.</p>
<h4><strong>Flowerbed framework</strong></h4>
<p>Flowerbed is a Python project that uses Docker for containerization. The project includes four different Docker containers:</p>
<ul>
<li>Catcher,</li>
<li>Certbot,</li>
<li>Nginx, and</li>
<li>Gardener.</li>
</ul>
<p>Catcher acts as both a DNS and HTTP server to receive and aggregate exfiltrated victim information [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/">T1048</a>]. For additional information on Catcher, refer to the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#exfil1">Exfiltration</a> section of this advisory. Flowerbed’s next container, Certbot, is based on one of the official Certbot containers, which allows for automated generation of Let’s Encrypt certificates using DNS challenges through Cloudflare. This certificate can then be used by the Nginx container, which serves as an HTTPS reverse proxy for Catcher, enabling Flowerbed to disguise some of its exfiltration activity through an encrypted communications channel [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/002/" target="_blank">T1048.002</a>]. The Nginx reverse proxy also validates that the Server Name Indicator (SNI) value contains “*.i.*” prior to forwarding the traffic to Catcher. If the SNI does not contain that string, the Nginx server returns a 444 error to the client. This is likely an attempt to reject non-Ulej connections. Finally, the Gardener container functions as a health check for the Catcher service. Gardener is a simple Python script that validates Catcher correctly receives and processes data.</p>
<p>The simplistic Flowerbed codebase has indications that artificial intelligence (AI) played a role in its development. This highlights how AI is increasingly being used to develop malicious capabilities [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1588/007/" target="_blank">T1588.007</a>]. The dependence on AI for a simple capability, such as Flowerbed, alongside a previous reliance on open source capabilities, such as Evilginx2 [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1588/002/" target="_blank">T1588.002</a>], likely indicates a lack of advanced technical knowledge within LAUNDRY BEAR, especially in relation to true software development capabilities.</p>
<h3><em><strong>Initial access</strong></em></h3>
<p>To gain initial access, LAUNDRY BEAR sends an email containing a malicious JavaScript payload to the target [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1566/" target="_blank">T1566</a>]. Through exploitation of <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a>, this JavaScript payload is immediately executed once the user views the malicious email [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1203/" target="_blank">T1203</a>], such as the one shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure1"><strong>Figure 1</strong></a>, in the ZCS webmail platform. Since at least November 2025, LAUNDRY BEAR began sending these phishing emails from victim infrastructure through compromised accounts [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1199/" target="_blank">T1199</a>], as shown in the email metadata in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure2"><strong>Figure 2</strong></a>. These compromised accounts were likely previous victims of this, or another LAUNDRY BEAR, campaign and their use is intended to further obfuscate and frustrate anti-phishing tools and training.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/figure1.png?itok=yrzcl7tK" width="604" height="235" alt="Figure 1: Example of malicious email">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 1: Example of malicious email</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/figure2.png?itok=vEulmmyx" width="604" height="102" alt="Figure 2: Headers from an example malicious email">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 2: Headers from an example malicious email</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p>According to the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), <a href="https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a> was initially published on 5 January 2026. This vulnerability allows for execution of a JavaScript payload included in email content due to improper sanitization of Cascading Style Sheet’s (CSS) @import directives within an email [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#wc5">5</a>]. Because the activity attributed to this campaign began in July 2025—months before Synacor released a patch and the CVE was published—the payload initially exploited a zero-day vulnerability at that time [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/004/" target="_blank">T1587.004</a>].  </p>
<p><strong>Utilization of a zero-day exploit within this campaign demonstrates the ability for even emerging threat groups like LAUNDRY BEAR to operationalize novel exploits into a highly successful capability.</strong></p>
<p>Hidden in LAUNDRY BEAR’s email is a Base64 encoded payload within the “onload” field of a Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) element [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/017/" target="_blank">T1027.017</a>], as shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure3"><strong>Figure 3</strong></a>. Leading up to the inclusion of this payload in the SVG element are various instances of @import directives, as required to leverage <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376">CVE-2025-66376</a>. This payload includes an XOR encrypted final script encoded in a Base64 inner payload (see <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure3"><strong>Figure 3</strong></a>) [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/013/" target="_blank">T1027.013</a>]. The outer payload decodes and decrypts the inner payload using an XOR function and a hardcoded key and then executes the script contained within the inner payload containing the collection and exfiltration logic. By changing the key used for the XOR encryption of the inner payload or adding additional @import directives with non-functional code [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/010/" target="_blank">T1027.010</a>], LAUNDRY BEAR can easily generate new payloads that bypass basic threat detection signatures. This malicious payload attempts to collect and exfiltrate information in 12 asynchronous stages [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1119/">T1119</a>]. The stages in order of appearance within the payload are as follows:</p>
<ol>
<li>sendStartPing,</li>
<li>gather_email,</li>
<li>gather_environment,</li>
<li>gather_2fa_codes,</li>
<li>gather_app_password,</li>
<li>gather_device_status,</li>
<li>gather_oauth_consumers,</li>
<li>gather_autocomplete_password,</li>
<li>enable_mail_protocols,</li>
<li>gather_gal,</li>
<li>sendArchives, and</li>
<li>sendFinishPing. </li>
</ol>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/figure3_0.png?itok=M-bj5-nb" width="607" height="577" alt="Figure 3: Malicious payload of example email">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 3: Malicious payload of example email</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p>Use of a zero-day exploit within this campaign demonstrates the ability for even emerging threat groups like LAUNDRY BEAR to operationalize novel exploits into a highly successful capability [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/" target="_blank">T1587</a>].</p>
<h3><em><strong>Persistence and credential access</strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<p>To establish sustained persistence into the victim’s email account, the script attempts to modify account preferences and collect authentication information. Any collected credentials are later exfiltrated, as further described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#exfil1">Exfiltration</a> section below. Other campaigns attributed to LAUNDRY BEAR also demonstrated the group’s ability to circumvent multi-factor authentication through session token replay [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1550/004/" target="_blank">T1550.004</a>], and the Zimbra campaign follows a similar trend.</p>
<p>The script used in this campaign tries to discover the victim’s email address during the <em>gather_email</em> stage [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1087/" target="_blank">T1087</a>]. The script searches for this email address in two ways. First, it examines the <em>batchInfoResponse </em>variable, which an HTML script element on the webpage can define, for an email address. Even if the script finds an email address there, it also checks whether it acquired a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) token as described later in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#collection1">Collection</a> section of this advisory. If so, the script uses the “GetIdentitiesRequest” Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) command under the “ZimbraAccount” namespace to determine the victim’s email address [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1185/" target="_blank">T1185</a>] and then exfiltrates it. However, if the script does not have a CSRF token or the SOAP request fails, the script exfiltrates the email value recovered from the first method instead. If both attempts fail to capture the victim’s email, the script sends a JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) payload with a key of “email” and value of <em>null </em>over HTTPS and does not attempt DNS exfiltration.</p>
<p>During the <em>gather_autocomplete_password</em> stage, the script attempts to collect the victim’s saved password via the autocomplete feature of the victim’s password manager. The script injects two HTML div elements requesting login credentials onto the page outside of the victim’s view, as shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure4"><strong>Figure 4</strong></a><strong> </strong>and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure5"><strong>Figure 5</strong></a>. After waiting five seconds, the script then attempts to extract the password provided automatically by the password manager from the input element shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure4"><strong>Figure 4</strong></a>. If there is no value in that input field, it checks the password input field shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure5"><strong>Figure 5</strong></a>. If neither input field contains a value, a JSON payload with a key of “autocomplete_password” and value of <em>null </em>is sent over HTTPS and DNS exfiltration is not attempted.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/figure4.png?itok=ZOZ8JHZC" width="1024" height="188" alt="Figure 4: First illegitimate login HTML element">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 4: First illegitimate login HTML element</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/figure5.png?itok=8xZU_GCa" width="1024" height="115" alt="Figure 5: Second illegitimate login HTML element">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 5: Second illegitimate login HTML element</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR almost certainly relies on a mail client using the Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) for persistent access to the victim’s mailbox. During the <em>enable_mail_protocols</em> stage, a SOAP request leveraging the “ModifyPrefsRequest” command under the “ZimbraAccount” namespace is sent. This request attempts to set the “zimbraPrefImapEnabled” preference to TRUE. While the default setting for “zimbraPrefImapEnabled” is not well documented, this action is almost certainly intended to ensure that IMAP access to the victim’s mailbox is enabled.</p>
<p>ZCS does not support 2FA for some mail clients, including IMAP. To support users who rely on IMAP clients, ZCS allows for the generation of Application Passcodes. Application Passcodes are randomly generated passwords that can be used for clients that cannot support the normal 2FA process to authenticate. During the <em>gather_app_password</em> stage, the script makes a SOAP request using the “CreateAppSpecificPasswordRequest” command under the “ZimbraAccount” namespace to create a new Application Passcode [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1556/006/" target="_blank">T1556.006</a>]. The SOAP request uses “ZimbraWeb” as the name of the application.</p>
<p>Additionally, the script also attempts to collect 2FA tokens. During the <em>gather_2fa_codes</em> stage, the script makes a SOAP request using the “GetScratchCodesRequest” command under the “ZimbraAccount” namespace. The script then attempts to exfiltrate any non-null 2FA codes collected this way. The number of codes can vary, and each code is exfiltrated to Flowerbed individually.</p>
<h3><em><strong>Collection</strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<p>As demonstrated in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#persistence1">Persistence and credential access</a> section, this script relies heavily on SOAP requests to collect victim information. To make these requests, the script aims to acquire the victim’s current CSRF token, which it attempts to access within the webpage’s local storage using localStorage.getItem("csrfToken"). If the script is unable to acquire this CSRF token, it will be unable to make any SOAP requests. In addition to the SOAP commands documented in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#persistence1">Persistence and credential access</a> section, other SOAP commands executed to collect victim information are shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table1"><strong>Table 1</strong></a>.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 1: Additional SOAP commands used</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p><strong>SOAP Command </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p><strong>Namespace </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p><strong>Stage </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>GetInfoRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>zimbraAccount </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>GetDeviceStatusRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>zimbraSync </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>gather_device_status </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>GetOAuthConsumersRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>zimbraAccount </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>gather_oauth_consumers </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>SearchGalRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>zimbraAccount </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW195872110 BCX8">
<p>gather_gal </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The script attempts to collect the victim’s GAL through brute force by searching for each two-character combination from a character set of “abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz1234567890.-_”. These queries are conducted using 20 batches of SOAP requests with 77 “SearchGalRequest” SOAP commands in each batch except for the last request containing only 58.</p>
<p>During the <em>gather_environment</em> stage, the script attempts to determine which type of ZCS webmail client the victim is using. The script checks the user’s current URL to determine the client type being used, checking for certain indicators (shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table2"><strong>Table 2</strong></a>) to determine the client type. The corresponding value is then used as the payload when exfiltrating the client type.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 2: ZCS webmail client types</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p><strong>Indicator </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p><strong>Client Type </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p><strong>Associated Value </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>?client=advanced </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>Advanced </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>c </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>/h/ </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>Standard </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>h </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>/modern/ </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>Modern </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW28945023 BCX8">
<p>m </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As part of collection, the script attempts to harvest any emails not marked as “junk” from the last 90 days from the victim’s account. Emails are collected daily by an HTTP GET request to the URL path, “/home/~/?fmt=tgz&amp;meta=0&amp;query=date:-{DAY_OFFSET}d AND (not in:junk)”. The <em>{DAY_OFFSET}</em> value would be between 0 and 89 representing how many days ago the email was sent or received. To prevent redundant collection and exfiltration of emails, a variable with a name based on the email date being queried, using a format of <em>zd_comp_YYYY-MM-DD</em>, and value of <em>true</em>, is saved to the <em>window.top.localStorage</em> property. This variable is saved regardless of whether the email is successfully exfiltrated.  </p>
<p>According to Mozilla documentation, if the user is not in a private browsing session, any data stored to localStorage does not typically expire. This means that if the user happens to execute the script again from the same computer, the script avoids attempting to re-exfiltrate previously captured emails. However, the script always attempts to pull any emails with a <em>{DAY_OFFSET} </em>of zero. In other words, the script always pulls emails sent or received the same day it is run. After email results are returned from the query for each day of email activity, those results are then passed to Flowerbed as described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#exfil1">Exfiltration</a> section.</p>
<p>The script also provides LAUNDRY BEAR with telemetry on any errors that occur during the collection process. This is accomplished by executing any collection or exfiltration code through helper functions that contain error handling logic. If an error occurs, a payload containing information on the error itself, the context of the error happening, and the stage in which the error occurred is sent to Flowerbed as described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#exfil1">Exfiltration</a> section below. For cases where the error occurs within a SOAP request, “:api” is concatenated to the stage value in the payload. If an error occurs during the batch SOAP requests that occur when collecting the GAL of the victim, the stage value will use a format of <em>gather_gal:{VAL}:api</em>. The <em>{VAL}</em> placeholder indicates which batch request, a number from 0 to 19, the error occurred in. Errors that occur during the password autocomplete interception process will use “gather_autocomplete_password:dom” for the stage value. Finally, if an error occurs when attempting to collect or exfiltrate a specific day’s emails, the stage will include which day the error occurred on, using the previously defined placeholder <em>{DAY_OFFSET},</em> with a format of <em>sendArchive:day-{DAY_OFFSET}</em>.</p>
<h3><em><strong>Exfiltration</strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<p>At the end of each stage in the collection process, the script attempts to exfiltrate acquired information to Flowerbed. The script primarily relies on two forms of data exfiltration: DNS [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/003/" target="_blank">T1048.003</a>] and HTTPS. Some information is exfiltrated over both the DNS and HTTPS channels.</p>
<p>Prior to exfiltration, a randomized 10- or 11-character alphanumeric string is generated as an identifier for the victim. This identifier is included in the URL of both the DNS- and HTTPS-based exfiltration.  </p>
<h4><strong>DNS exfiltration</strong></h4>
<p>DNS exfiltration occurs through DNS A record queries. To ensure data exfiltrated through DNS is not corrupted when traversing through non-actor-controlled DNS infrastructure, <em>Ulej </em>maintains compliance with RFC 1035, Domain Names - Implementation and Specification, specifically accounting for the case insensitivity and subdomain length requirements. Base32 encoding is used to create a case-insensitive payload. Once the payload is encoded, a period (“.”) is added every 60 characters to ensure each subdomain is under 63 characters long. The script then creates a new image object sourced from a URL with the scheme defined in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure6"><strong>Figure 6</strong></a>. Any traffic involving DNS exfiltration will have “d-“ prefixing the victim identifier, and the subdomain immediately following indicates the type of information being exfiltrated.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/Figure6.png?itok=Tv8RT8o8" width="1024" height="49" alt="Figure 6: Structure for information exfiltrated by DNS">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 6: Structure for information exfiltrated by DNS</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p>When the script generates an image object, the browser tries to retrieve the complete domain of the URL specified as the source of the image. This triggers a DNS request sent to the actor-controlled server and processed by Flowerbed. <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table3"><strong>Table 3</strong></a> lists both the information exfiltrated via DNS and their corresponding data type identifiers in the DNS queries.  </p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 3: DNS exfiltration</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p><strong>Type of Information </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p><strong>Exfiltration Stage </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p><strong>Data Type </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>Victim’s Email Address </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_email </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>e </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>Client Type </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>c </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>Zimbra Version </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment  </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>v </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>URL at Time of Exploitation </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>url </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>2FA Scratch Codes </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_2fa_codes </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>2fa </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>Newly Created Application Password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_app_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>pa </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>Harvested Autocomplete Password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>gather_autocomplete_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW258158484 BCX8">
<p>pw </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4><strong>HTTPS exfiltration</strong></h4>
<p>Any information exfiltrated via DNS is also exfiltrated through HTTPS, as well as additional data including email content, contacts, attachments, and error logging information. By using Let’s Encrypt certificates, this group can quickly deploy new infrastructure and leverage encrypted HTTPS communications with valid server certificates when exfiltrating information from the victim’s environment. The HTTPS exfiltration capability only uses two HTTP content types, defined in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table4"><strong>Table 4</strong></a>. Traffic associated with HTTPS exfiltration will use the URL scheme shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure7"><strong>Figure 7</strong></a>.  </p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 4: HTTPS exfiltration types</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p><strong>Content Type </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p><strong>URL Path </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p>application/json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p>/v/p </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p>application/octet-stream </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW3397685 BCX8">
<p>/v/d </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/Figure%207.png?itok=CdTcyMdN" width="1024" height="50" alt="Figure 7: Structure for information exfiltrated by HTTPS">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 7: Structure for information exfiltrated by HTTPS</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<p>Some of the data transmitted via HTTPS uses the standard JSON content type format. The script includes the information in a POST request to actor-controlled infrastructure.  </p>
<p><a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table5"><strong>Table 5</strong></a> provides a summary of the JSON-based exfiltration.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 5: HTTPS JSON exfiltration  </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p><strong>Type of Information </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p><strong>Exfiltration Stage </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p><strong>JSON Key(s) </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>Victim’s Email Address </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>gather_email </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>email </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>Client Type, Version, and Current URL </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>client, version, full_url </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>Newly Created Application Password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>gather_app_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>app_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>Harvested Autocomplete Password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>gather_autocomplete_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW25077005 BCX8">
<p>autocomplete_password </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The script transmits all HTTPS exfiltration not identified in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table5"><strong>Table 5</strong></a> using the Octet-Stream content type as binary data. The POST requests for this method include a filename in the “X-Filename” header. Traditionally, developers use headers prefixed with “X-” to denote custom headers that do not follow a defined standard. The purpose of including this header remains unclear since the Catcher capability ignores the provided filename when saving the data. <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table6"><strong>Table 6</strong></a> summarizes the data exfiltrated in this format.</p>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="WACAltTextDescribedBy SCXW189907655 BCX8"><a class="ck-anchor"></a></div>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong> Table 6: HTTPS binary exfiltration</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p><strong>Type of Information </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p><strong>Exfiltration Stage </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p><strong>X-Filename Header </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>SOAP request for GetInfoRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>gather_environment </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>zimbra_batch_analytics.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>SOAP request for GetScratchCodesRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>gather_2fa_codes </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>zimbra_batch_analytics.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>SOAP request for GetDeviceStatusRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>gather_device_status </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>zimbra_batch_analytics.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>SOAP request for GetOAuthConsumersRequest </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>gather_oauth_consumers </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>zimbra_batch_analytics.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>Victim Organization’s Global Address List </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>gather_gal </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>telemetry_{1-20}.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>Last 90 Days of Victim’s Emails </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>sendArchives </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW189907655 BCX8">
<p>telemetryData_{0-89}.json </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<p>The script sends all exfiltrated data identified in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table6"><strong>Table 6</strong></a> to the Catcher service exactly as received from the SOAP request in a JSON payload, except for email exfiltration. For email exfiltration, the script sends it as a GZIP compressed archive [<a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1560/" target="_blank">T1560</a>]. Although most of the exfiltration consists of valid JSON, the script still attempts to exfiltrate all information identified in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table6"><strong>Table 6</strong></a> using the application/octet-stream content typing rather than application/json.</p>
<p>At the beginning and end of the collection and exfiltration activity, during the <em>sendStartPing</em> and <em>sendFinishPing </em>stages respectively, the script submits a POST request with a JSON payload to indicate that the script is starting or finishing execution. Throughout execution, the script also logs error events and send the logs using similar JSON payloads. The script sends the JSON in a POST request to the URL documented in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure2"><strong>Figure 2</strong></a>, using a URL path of “/v/p” and with a “subtype” key that shows which type of action it logged (<em>start, finish, or error</em>).  </p>
<h4><strong>Catcher</strong></h4>
<p><em>Ulej </em>exfiltrates information to Flowerbed to be handled by a service named Catcher. Catcher is a containerized Python application, running in Docker as part of Flowerbed, which is detailed in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#resourcedev1">Resource development</a> section. It receives exfiltrated data and temporarily stores it, enabling its eventual transfer to infrastructure designed for long-term, secure storage.</p>
<p>Catcher acts as an HTTP server over port 8000 and a DNS server on port 53. As described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#resourcedev1">Resource development</a> section, the Flowerbed project uses an additional Docker container running an Nginx reverse proxy to enable HTTPS support. This reverse proxy uses a certificate generated by Let’s Encrypt and forwards all traffic with an SNI containing “*.i.*” to port 8000 within the Catcher container.</p>
<p>The DNS service can accept A, AAAA, MX, TXT, and CAA queries. For any MX, AAAA, or CAA queries, the server will always provide an empty response. The system only supports TXT records as needed to process Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME) requests, which enable the assignment of Let’s Encrypt certificates. If the server receives an A query, Catcher will always respond with the public IP address of the Flowerbed server.  </p>
<p>However, if a query includes a domain formatted as shown in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure6"><strong>Figure 6</strong></a> and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure7"><strong>Figure 7</strong></a>, the service saves a log file in JSON format to disk containing the following details of the DNS query:</p>
<ul>
<li>Time of query,</li>
<li>Source IP address for query,</li>
<li>Queried domain, and</li>
<li>Type of query.</li>
</ul>
<p>The HTTP server typically responds with OK, except in cases where the path is “pixel.gif” when the response contains a 1x1 gif image with a SHA-256 hash of ef1955ae757c8b966c83248350331bd3a30f658ced11f387f8ebf05ab3368629. Like the DNS service, the HTTP service will only log entries when the domain found in the host header of the request follows the expected formatting as seen in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure6"><strong>Figure 6</strong></a> and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure7"><strong>Figure 7</strong></a>. As the HTTPS exfiltration uses non-standardized binary and JSON-formatted payloads when exfiltrating to Catcher, Catcher will check the content type of the request. If the content type is set to “application/json”, Catcher encodes the data in Base64 and includes it in the JSON log entry written to disk. If the content type is set to any other value, Catcher leaves the Base64 payload in the JSON log entry blank and saves the payload to a separate file with the same filename as the JSON log entry with a “.bin” file extension. An HTTPS exfiltration event causes Catcher to save a JSON formatted log file to disk containing the following information from the HTTP request:</p>
<ul>
<li>Time,</li>
<li>Source IP address,</li>
<li>Request method,</li>
<li>Host,</li>
<li>Path,</li>
<li>Query string,</li>
<li>Headers, and</li>
<li>Base64 payload.</li>
</ul>
<p>These JSON event log files and binary output files are then initially saved to the directory <em>/root/hits/tmp</em> and later moved to the <em>/root/hits/ready</em> directory once processed. This prevents incomplete files, which are still being uploaded to Catcher, from premature exfiltration from the server. Approximately every 60 seconds, a likely automated workflow establishes a Secure Shell (SSH) connection with the server hosting Flowerbed for a few seconds, almost certainly exfiltrating the data processed by Catcher to non-public-facing infrastructure. The command in <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#figure8"><strong>Figure 8</strong></a> also executes hourly to remove all files last modified at least two days ago from the <em>/root/hits/ready</em> directory.</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>



<figure class="c-figure c-figure--image" role="group">
  
  <div class="c-figure__media">    <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/2026-07/Figure%208-Command%20used%20for%20automated%20directory%20cleanup.png?itok=IqvZvbLK" width="1024" height="92" alt="Figure 8: Command used for automated directory cleanup">



</div>
      <figcaption class="c-figure__caption"><em><strong>Figure 8: Command used for automated directory cleanup</strong></em></figcaption>
  </figure>
<h2><strong>Response strategies</strong></h2>
<h3><em><strong>Mitigations</strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<p>In many cases, by the time an organization identifies a compromise related to this campaign, numerous sensitive and proprietary emails have already been exfiltrated. The significant risk posed by this cyber threat emphasizes the importance for organizations that use ZCS and other similar webmail solutions to take proactive steps to mitigate this risk.</p>
<p>All organizations that use the ZCS webmail service should <strong>immediately prioritize</strong> ensuring that their ZCS is not running a vulnerable version. A patch for <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a> was released for both 10.1.13 and 10.0.18 versions of ZCS [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ApplicationHardening">D3-AH</a>]. If immediate patching is not feasible, organizations should advise employees to use alternative mail clients to access email and avoid using the Classic ZCS webmail client until ZCS is updated to a non-vulnerable version [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/tactic/d3f:Isolate/" target="_blank">d3f:Isolate</a>].</p>
<p>System administrators should closely monitor any Internet-connected ZCS or other email systems and the workstations that access those systems and promptly apply available software updates [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ApplicationHardening" target="_blank">D3-AH</a>]. Administrators can maintain awareness of active vulnerability exploitation by referencing open source resources, including <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog">CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog</a> and <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/collection/vulnerability-management/guidance/responding-to-active-exploitation" target="_blank">NCSC-UK’s Responding to active exploitation of vulnerabilities</a> guidance.</p>
<p>Organizations should consider using a third-party authentication service that supports passkeys for authentication to mediate access to ZCS and other services that do not natively support passkeys. By doing so, organizations can work to eliminate the possibility of automated password collection from autocomplete or password reuse [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:CredentialHardening" target="_blank">D3-CH</a>]. However, Application Passcodes may still be necessary and should be monitored closely.  </p>
<p>Organizations should implement network monitoring capabilities with collection and short-term retention of packet capture or NetFlow data and maintain log collection and storage [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#MaintainLogCollectionStorage3Q">CPG 3.Q</a>]. This will allow organizations to monitor for and identify suspicious network activity [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#IdentifyAdverseEvents4B">CPG 4.B</a>], such as:</p>
<ul>
<li>Significant amounts of outbound data being sent to IPs associated with VPS providers not used by the organization [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-NTA</a>];</li>
<li>Frequent DNS queries for a suspicious domain with seemingly random subdomains [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:DNSTrafficAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-DNSTA</a>];</li>
<li>A sudden spike of connections to a server associated with a recently established domain [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficCommunityDeviation">D3-NTCD</a>]; and  </li>
<li>Connections to internal services, such as webmail, from VPN providers frequently leveraged by this group for nefarious activity, such as Mullvad VPN [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficCommunityDeviation">D3-NTCD</a>].</li>
</ul>
<p>Additionally, for organizations that can inspect the content of outbound HTTPS connections via break-and-inspect infrastructure, security teams should identify traffic matching the characteristics described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#exfil1">Exfiltration</a> section of this advisory.</p>
<h3><em><strong>Indicators of compromise (IOCs)</strong></em><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h3>
<h4><strong>Flowerbed infrastructure</strong></h4>
<p>The following indicators have been attributed to use by LAUNDRY BEAR for their campaign targeting ZCS’s webmail service as of the publication of this advisory. (<strong>Disclaimer: </strong>Due to the frequency of operational structure changes by this group, these indicators are intended solely for historic attribution purposes. Some indicators, such as IPs, compromised emails, and domains, may be outdated, so organizations should check for current activity before acting on these IOCs.) <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table7"><strong>Table 7</strong></a> provides details about the server infrastructure used to host Flowerbed, and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table8"><strong>Table 8</strong></a> lists the corresponding SHA-1 hash values for the Let’s Encrypt certificates used by that infrastructure [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:IdentifierActivityAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-IAA</a>].</p>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 7: Flowerbed server infrastructure</strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p><strong>Domain </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p><strong>IP Address </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p><strong>First Seen </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p><strong>Last Seen </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>zmailanalytics[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>216.252.238[.]104 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>8 July 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>15 October 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>zimbra-metadata[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>216.252.238[.]18 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>20 August 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>14 October 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>analyticemailmeter[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>37.120.247[.]228 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>24 September 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>18 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>emailanalytics.com[.]ua </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>185.86.79[.]95 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>24 September 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>18 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>mailnalysis[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>104.248.134[.]194 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>11 November 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>17 February 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>zimbrastat[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>64.226.124[.]190 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>18 December 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>18 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>zimbrasoft.com[.]ua </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>193.238.152[.]66 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>20 January 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>18 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>synacorzimbra[.]nl </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>216.252.238[.]64 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>3 February 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>30 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>istc-cloud[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>194.156.103[.]193 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>5 February 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW193774983 BCX8">
<p>30 March 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 8: Flowerbed X.509 certificate SHA-1 hashes  </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p><strong>Associated Domain </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p><strong>X.509 SHA-1 Hash </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p><strong>First Seen </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p><strong>Last Seen </strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>zmailanalytics[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>2e4f314bc9943cab5005d6fde0b271c74d47bc9d </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>8 Jul 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>6 Aug 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.zmailanalytics[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>50a87d926621dd06389ba50d86e0ff574ed713a8 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>6 Aug 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>13 Oct 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.zimbra-metadata[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>c5a72420e7bb308d078e62128430897f82194c95 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>20 Aug 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>14 Oct 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.analyticemailmeter[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>8959c4d29e29f02ea94ea8bb21c8df2594c5549d </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>24 Sep 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>8 Nov 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.emailanalytics.com[.]ua </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>62eb76432597694edb01c1fe57aab0cfe03a7178 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>25 Sep 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>27 Sep 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.mailnalysis[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>cddf5c3be1e07f28140aed165b929bf2d614922a </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>12 Nov 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>17 Dec 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.zimbrastat[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>18b3ad442ce73cc8656d51d75bbd7c855f2cb7e8 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>18 Dec 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>28 Dec 2025 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.zimbrasoft.com[.]ua </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>1b25041ececf2457eef0270fc1d785cec8ec9ded </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>21 Jan 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>10 Feb 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.synacorzimbra[.]nl </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>e4fe6466a4f9a4249fe330651e914e45bbdca44a </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>5 Feb 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>22 Mar 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>*.i.istc-cloud[.]com </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>b6b77c9a455225d525834a403ca9ef5481ed0447 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>12 Feb 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW66173475 BCX8">
<p>30 Mar 2026 </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR has used the following email addresses to procure resources used for this campaign:</p>
<ul>
<li>ivanka.zurabishvili@proton[.]me,</li>
<li>zmul1@buildandconsulting[.]com,</li>
<li>garrysmithme@pinmx[.]net, and</li>
<li>hostingclient@pinmx[.]net.</li>
</ul>
<h4><strong>Phishing distribution</strong></h4>
<p>LAUNDRY BEAR primarily relied on ProtonMail for distribution of malicious email. However, as stated above, LAUNDRY BEAR’s more recent efforts likely have shifted to distributing the payload through previous victims.  </p>
<p>The following email addresses have distributed payloads attributed to this campaign:</p>
<ul>
<li>c.laurent.ejfa@proton[.]me,</li>
<li>j.moreau.epsc@proton[.]me,</li>
<li>liberty.insights@proton[.]me,</li>
<li>certain email addresses (presumably compromised) at the isofts.kiev[.]ua domain (i.e., ending with @isofts.kiev[.]ua), and</li>
<li>certain email addresses (presumably compromised) at the navs.edu[.]ua domain (i.e., ending with @navs.edu[.]ua).</li>
</ul>
<p>Additionally, the following are SHA-256 hashes of email samples containing the malicious payload attributed to this campaign:</p>
<ul>
<li>98df604ecc57f884a2e6ce3266a0013ad64455cac48442c2312cfa4765007aaf,</li>
<li>60db9abae75cd8ccc49dd7ea5feb41677566dcd442f12ebc5745ffd2810fb874,</li>
<li>b1f5beb1175fc5c7d1806a2f0d900eb124c54f0286c5c52b66eea7a6633adb1d, and</li>
<li>1517b3caa495f6c4e832df9c75fc94667e3c233773f7fa4e056d5e30e5ead760.</li>
</ul>
<h4><strong>Post-compromise artifacts</strong></h4>
<p>Currently, the script does not remove artifacts. This leaves additional opportunities to identify victims of this activity. While emphasis should always be placed on consistent monitoring of network traffic and endpoint activity, there are a variety of persistent artifacts described below that can be used to identify victims of this campaign.</p>
<p>This <em>Ulej </em>capability relies on creating a significant number of SOAP requests to collect account information for exfiltration. ZCS logs from these requests are stored, by default, in the <em>/opt/zimbra/log/mailbox.log</em> file [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ProcessAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-PA</a>]. A significant amount of SOAP request activity that aligns with what was described in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#persistence1">Persistence and credential access</a> and <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#collection1">Collection</a> sections of this advisory could indicate a potential compromise. Specific examples of high-risk SOAP request activity might include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Many <em>SearchGalRequest </em>command requests from a single user over a short period of time;</li>
<li>Use of the <em>CreateAppSpecificPasswordRequest</em> command, especially in cases where it is creating an Application Passcode named “ZimbraWeb”; and</li>
<li>Use of the GetScratchCodesRequest command.</li>
</ul>
<p>While LAUNDRY BEAR uses the localStorage property to track what days had emails previously exfiltrated, defenders can use this property to identify victims of this campaign and determine the scope of exfiltrated information [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ProcessAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-PA</a>]. Review of the items stored in that property for an organization’s ZCS webmail client page on an endpoint device could indicate compromise if there are items named with a format of <em>zd_comp_YYYY-MM-DD,</em> as explained in the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#collection1">Collection</a> section of this advisory.</p>
<p>While Application Passcodes have non-malicious purposes, in this case instances of these passcodes with the name “ZimbraWeb” are almost certainly malicious. The ZCS webmail application can support 2FA natively and does not require the use of an Application Passcode, so there is no reason that there should be one named “ZimbraWeb.”</p>
<p>In instances where organizations identify victims of this campaign, they should also examine the inbox of the suspected victim for the original phishing email [<a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:MessageAnalysis" target="_blank">D3-MA</a>]. If an email that has a payload exploiting <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376">CVE-2025-66376</a> is discovered, <strong>steps should be taken immediately to identify and quarantine other instances of emails with similar body content, senders, and subject lines to prevent further exploitation and exfiltration.  </strong></p>
<h3><em><strong>Remediation</strong></em></h3>
<p>In the event an organization identifies activity associated with this campaign, that organization should take steps to minimize further exploitation. The organization should consider requesting that employees minimize use of the ZCS webmail client until the organization updates to a patched version that is not vulnerable to <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank">CVE-2025-66376</a>.</p>
<p>Organizations should use identifiers from the <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#ioc1">IOCs</a> section of this report to identify any individuals compromised by this campaign and record the date(s) of compromise(s) to determine the scale and scope of emails exfiltrated.</p>
<p>All users from the organization should have all Application Passcodes and 2FA scratch keys revoked. Affected organizations should require all employees to change passwords in line with establishing minimum password strength requirements [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#EstablishMinimumPasswordStrength3B">CPG 3.B</a>] and creating unique credentials [<a href="https://www.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-performance-goals-2-0-cpg-2-0#CreateUniqueCredentials3C">CPG 3.C</a>], specifically noting that compromised employees might have had any password stored in a password manager exfiltrated.</p>
<h2><strong>Works cited</strong></h2>
<p>[1<a class="ck-anchor"></a>] Netherlands General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD) and Netherlands Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD). AIVD and MIVD identify a new Russian cyber threat actor. 2025. <a href="https://www.aivd.nl/site/binaries/site-content/collections/documents/2025/05/27/aivd-en-mivd-onderkennen-nieuwe-russische-cyberactor/Advisory+AIVD+en+MIVD+Public+report+on+new+cyber+actor.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.aivd.nl/site/binaries/site-content/collections/documents/2025/05/27/aivd-en-mivd-onderkennen-nieuwe-russische-cyberactor/Advisory+AIVD+en+MIVD+Public+report+on+new+cyber+actor.pdf</a></p>
<p>[2]<a class="ck-anchor"></a> Microsoft Corporation. New Russia-affiliated actor Void Blizzard targets critical sectors for espionage. 2025. <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2025/05/27/new-russia-affiliated-actor-void-blizzard-targets-critical-sectors-for-espionage/" target="_blank">https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2025/05/27/new-russia-affiliated-actor-void-blizzard-targets-critical-sectors-for-espionage/</a></p>
<p>[3]<a class="ck-anchor"></a> Palo Alto Networks Unit 42. Russian Global Webmail Espionage. 2026. <a href="https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/russian-webmail-espionage/">https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/russian-webmail-espionage/ </a></p>
<p>[4]<a class="ck-anchor"></a> Proofpoint. TA488 Targets Zimbra Mailservers with Half-Click Exploits. 2026. <a href="https://www.proofpoint.com/us/blog/threat-insight/ta488-zcs-exploit">https://www.proofpoint.com/us/blog/threat-insight/ta488-zcs-exploit</a></p>
<p>[5]<a class="ck-anchor"></a> Seqrite. Operation GhostMail: Russian APT exploits Zimbra Webmail to Target Ukraine State Agency. 2026. <a href="https://www.seqrite.com/blog/operation-ghostmail-zimbra-xss-russian-apt-ukraine/" target="_blank">https://www.seqrite.com/blog/operation-ghostmail-zimbra-xss-russian-apt-ukraine/  </a></p>
<h2><strong>Footnotes</strong></h2>
<p><sup>1</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Národní úřad pro kybernetickou a informační bezpečnost<br><sup>2</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup> </sup>Forsvarets Efterretningstjeneste<br><sup>3</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup> </sup>Välisluureamet<br><sup>4</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Sotilastiedustelu<br><sup>5</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup> </sup> Suojelupoliisi<br><sup>6</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Direction générale de la sécurité intérieure<br><sup>7</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d’information<br><sup>8</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Agenzia Informazioni e Sicurezza Esterna<br><sup>9</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Agenzia Informazioni e Sicurezza Interna<br><sup>10</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> Serviciul de Informații și Securitate al Republicii Moldova<br><sup>11 </sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a>Agencja Wywiadu<br><sup>12</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup> </sup>Służba Kontrwywiadu Wojskowego<br><sup>13</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a><sup> </sup>Centro Nacional de Inteligencia<br><sup>14 </sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a>Nationellt Cybersäkerhetscenter<br><sup>15</sup><a class="ck-anchor"></a> MITRE and ATT&amp;CK are registered trademarks of The MITRE Corporation. MITRE D3FEND is a trademark of The MITRE Corporation.</p>
<h2><strong>Acknowledgements</strong></h2>
<p>The authoring agencies acknowledge the contributions to this advisory from Palo Alto Networks Unit 42 and Proofpoint.</p>
<h2><strong>Disclaimer of endorsement</strong></h2>
<p>The information and opinions contained in this document are provided "as is" and without any warranties or guarantees. Reference herein to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government, and this guidance shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.</p>
<p>Organizations have no obligation to respond or provide information back to the authoring organizations in response to this joint advisory. If, after reviewing the information provided, an organization decides to provide information to the authoring organizations, reporting must be consistent with all applicable laws and policies.</p>
<h2><strong>Purpose</strong></h2>
<p>This document was developed in furtherance of the authoring agencies’ cybersecurity missions, including their responsibilities to identify and disseminate threats, and to develop and issue cybersecurity specifications and mitigations. This information may be shared broadly to reach all appropriate stakeholders.</p>
<h2><strong>Contact</strong></h2>
<div class="SCXW95230887 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW95230887 BCX8">
<p><strong>United States organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>National Security Agency</strong> <br>Cybersecurity Report Feedback: <a href="mailto:CybersecurityReports@nsa.gov" target="_blank"><u>CybersecurityReports@nsa.gov</u></a> <br>Defense Industrial Base Inquiries and Cybersecurity Services: <a href="mailto:DIB_Defense@cyber.nsa.gov" target="_blank"><u>DIB_Defense@cyber.nsa.gov</u></a> <br>Media Inquiries / Press Desk: NSA Media Relations: 443-634-0721, <a href="mailto:MediaRelations@nsa.gov" target="_blank"><u>MediaRelations@nsa.gov</u></a> </li>
<li><strong>Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency</strong> <br>CISA’s 24/7 Operations Center (<a href="mailto:contact@cisa.dhs.gov" target="_blank"><u>contact@cisa.dhs.gov</u></a>), or by calling 1-844-Say-CISA (1-844-729-2472). </li>
<li><strong>Federal Bureau of Investigation</strong> <br>If you or someone you know has fallen victim to this campaign, file a complaint with <a class="Hyperlink SCXW95230887 BCX8" href="https://www.ic3.gov/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><u>IC3</u></a>. </li>
<li><strong>Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency </strong> <br>DCSA Counterintelligence, Cyber Mission Center, Cyber Threat Operations Branch: <a href="mailto:DCSA.CI.CyberOps@mail.mil" target="_blank"><u>DCSA.CI.CyberOps@mail.mil</u></a> <br>Cleared Contactors (CCs) should contact their DCSA Counterintelligence Special Agent to report information pertaining to suspicious contacts or physical/digital efforts to obtain illegal or unauthorized access to the CC’s cleared facility/information, as required by 32 CFR 117. <br>Media/Public Inquiries: <a href="mailto:dcsa.quantico.dcsa-hq.mbx.pa@mail.mil" target="_blank"><u>dcsa.quantico.dcsa-hq.mbx.pa@mail.mil</u></a>  </li>
<li><strong>Department of Defense Cyber Crime Center </strong> <br>Defense Industrial Base Inquiries and Cybersecurity Services: <a href="mailto:DC3.DCISE@us.af.mil" target="_blank"><u>DC3.DCISE@us.af.mil</u></a> <br>Defense Industrial Base mandatory cyber incident reporting as required by 10 U.S. Code Sections 391 and 393 and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 252.204-7012 is submitted at <a href="https://dibnet.dod.mil/" target="_blank"><u>https://dibnet.dod.mil</u></a> <br>Media Inquiries / Press Desk: <a href="mailto:DC3.Information@us.af.mil" target="_blank"><u>DC3.Information@us.af.mil</u></a> </li>
<li><strong>Naval Criminal Investigative Service</strong> <br>To report criminal activity impacting the United States Navy, go to <a href="http://www.ncis.navy.mil/" target="_blank"><u>www.ncis.navy.mil</u></a> and click “Submit a Tip”</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Dutch organizations</strong> </p>
<ul>
<li>Defence Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD): <a href="https://www.defensie.nl/onderwerpen/m/militaire-inlichtingen-en-veiligheid" target="_blank"><u>https://www.defensie.nl/onderwerpen/m/militaire-inlichtingen-en-veiligheid</u></a>  </li>
<li>General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD): <a href="https://www.aivd.nl/" target="_blank"><u>https://www.aivd.nl</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Australian organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Australian Signals Directorate <br>Visit <a href="https://www.cyber.gov.au/about-us/about-asd-acsc/contact-us#no-back" target="_blank"><u>cyber.gov.au</u></a> or call 1300 292 371 (1300 CYBER 1) to report cybersecurity incidents and access alerts and advisories. </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Canadian organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (Cyber Centre), part of the Communications Security Establishment, encourages Canadian organizations to report cyber incidents and to strengthen the security of their networking devices.  <br>Report an incident or suspicious activity to the Cyber Centre by email at <a href="mailto:contact@cyber.gc.ca" target="_blank"><u>contact@cyber.gc.ca</u></a>, online via the reporting tool <a href="https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/incident-management" target="_blank"><u>Report a cyber incident - Canadian Centre for Cyber Security</u></a> or by phone at 1-833-CYBER-88 (1-833-292-3788). </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>New Zealand organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>New Zealand National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC-NZ): <a href="mailto:info@ncsc.govt.nz" target="_blank"><u>info@ncsc.govt.nz</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>United Kingdom organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Report significant cyber security incidents to <a href="https://ncsc.gov.uk/report-an-incident" target="_blank"><u>ncsc.gov.uk/report-an-incident</u></a> (monitored 24/7) </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Estonia organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service (EFIS): <a href="mailto:info@valisluureamet.ee" target="_blank"><u>info@valisluureamet.ee</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Finnish organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Finnish Security and Intelligence Service: <a href="https://supo.fi/en/contact" target="_blank"><u>supo.fi/en/contact</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>French organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>French organizations are encouraged to report suspicious activity or incident related information found in this advisory by contacting ANSSI/CERT-FR at: <a href="mailto:cert-fr@ssi.gouv.fr" target="_blank"><u>cert-fr@ssi.gouv.fr</u></a> or by phone at: 3218 or +33 9 70 83 32 18. </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Italian Organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Italian External Intelligence and Security Agency (AISE):  <br>Visit <a href="https://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/" target="_blank"><u>https://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/</u></a>  </li>
<li>Italian Internal Intelligence and Security Agency (AISI):  <br>Visit <a href="https://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/" target="_blank"><u>https://www.sicurezzanazionale.gov.it/</u></a> </li>
</ul>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW214395380 BCX8">
<p><strong>Moldovan organizations </strong></p>
</div>
<div class="ListContainerWrapper SCXW214395380 BCX8">
<ul type="disc">
<li>Security and Intelligence Service of the Republic of Moldova (SIS RM): <a href="mailto:cybersec@sis.md" target="_blank"><u>cybersec@sis.md</u></a> </li>
</ul>
</div>
<p><strong>Polish organizations </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Polish Foreign Intelligence Agency (AW): <a href="mailto:ctiteam@aw.gov.pl" target="_blank"><u>ctiteam@aw.gov.pl</u></a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<h2><strong>Appendix A: MITRE ATT&amp;CK tactics and techniques</strong><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h2>
<p>See <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table9"><strong>Table 9</strong></a> through <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table19"><strong>Table 19</strong></a> for all the threat actor tactics and techniques referenced in this advisory.<a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 9: Reconnaissance </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Gather Victim Identity Information: Credentials </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1589/001/" target="_blank"><u>T1589.001</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The payload attempts to intercept a victim’s password from their password manager. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Gather Victim Identity Information: Email Addresses </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1589/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1589.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The payload attempts to grab the victim’s email address from various data stores. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Search Open Websites/Domains </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1593/" target="_blank"><u>T1593</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This group likely leverages public information to support target development. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Active Scanning </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1595/" target="_blank"><u>T1595</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Port scanning can be used by this group to assist with determining exploitability of identified targets. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Search Open Technical Databases: Scan Databases </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1596/005/" target="_blank"><u>T1596.005</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Various public datasets can provide information to support discovery of exploitable targets. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Search Closed Sources </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1597/" target="_blank"><u>T1597</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Previously exfiltrated data can be used to enhance target development efforts. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Search Closed Sources: Purchase Technical Data </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1597/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1597.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Commercial datasets can also be used to support target development efforts. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="WACAltTextDescribedBy SCXW76044448 BCX8"><a class="ck-anchor"></a></div>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 10: Resource Development </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Acquire Infrastructure </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1583/" target="_blank"><u>T1583</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This group used Mullvad VPN to anonymize traffic sent to operational infrastructure. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Acquire Infrastructure: Virtual Private Server </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1583/003/" target="_blank"><u>T1583.003</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This group procured VPS servers from a variety of vendors. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Develop Capabilities </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/" target="_blank"><u>T1587</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The <em>Ulej</em> capability was developed likely for use by this group to conduct spear phishing campaigns. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Develop Capabilities: Malware </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/001/" target="_blank"><u>T1587.001</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Development of a novel payload that steals a victim’s emails and other sensitive account information. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Develop Capabilities: Exploits </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1587/004/" target="_blank"><u>T1587.004</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Development of a novel, at the time, cross-site-scripting (XSS) exploit that enables execution of arbitrary JavaScript. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obtain Capabilities: Tool </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1588/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1588.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Open source tools, such as Evilginx2, have also been used by the group. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obtain Capabilities: Artificial Intelligence </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1588/007/" target="_blank"><u>T1588.007</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The group appears to have leveraged AI to support development efforts. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Stage Capabilities </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1608/" target="_blank"><u>T1608</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Flowerbed is deployed to a procured server in the cloud. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 11: Initial Access </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Valid Accounts </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1078/" target="_blank"><u>T1078</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This actor has used commercial datasets to acquire account credentials and gain unauthorized access to accounts. Additionally, this actor is believed to use previously compromised accounts to conduct spear phishing.  </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Trusted Relationship </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1199/" target="_blank"><u>T1199</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The group sends malicious payloads to targeted individuals using previously compromised accounts that might have an established relationship with the target.  </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Phishing </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1566/" target="_blank"><u>T1566</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The actors used spear phishing to lure users into opening malicious email. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 12: Execution </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Exploitation for Client Execution </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1203/" target="_blank"><u>T1203</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>An XSS vulnerability was leveraged to execute the JavaScript payload. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 13: Persistence </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Account Manipulation </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1098/" target="_blank"><u>T1098</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Enabling IMAP and Application Passcodes provides persistent access to the compromised account. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1556/006/" target="_blank"><u>T1556.006</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Creating Application Passcodes to bypass 2FA and stealing a user’s “Scratch Keys,” which can be used in place of a 2FA token. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 14: Privilege Escalation </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Valid Accounts </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1078/" target="_blank"><u>T1078</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This actor has used commercial datasets to acquire account credentials and gain unauthorized privileged access to accounts.  </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 15: Stealth </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obfuscated Files or Information: Command Obfuscation </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/010/" target="_blank"><u>T1027.010</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obfuscated JavaScript payload sent to targets to exploit the XSS vulnerability. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obfuscated Files or Information: Encrypted/Encoded File </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/013/" target="_blank"><u>T1027.013</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The JavaScript payload included both a Base64-encoded and XOR-encrypted inner payload. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Obfuscated Files or Information: SVG Smuggling </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1027/017/" target="_blank"><u>T1027.017</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The payload was contained in an “onload” attribute within an SVG image included in the malicious email. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Use Alternate Authentication Material: Web Session Cookie </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1550/004/" target="_blank"><u>T1550.004</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Previous campaigns using AiTM leveraged stealing and use of a victim’s session cookies to authenticate. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 16: Credential Access </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1556/006/" target="_blank"><u>T1556.006</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Creating Application Passcodes to bypass 2FA and stealing a user’s “Scratch Keys,” which can be used in place of a 2FA token. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Adversary-in-the-Middle </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1557/" target="_blank"><u>T1557</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Previous campaigns used Evilginx2 as an AiTM toolkit to intercept credentials and session cookies. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 17: Collection </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Data Staged: Remote Data Staging </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1074/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1074.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Exfiltrated data was sent to an actor-controlled VPS prior to assumed long-term storage solutions. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Email Collection </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1114/" target="_blank"><u>T1114</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>This group has emphasized collection of emails. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Email Collection: Remote Email Collection </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1114/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1114.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Emails are collected via API calls to the ZCS mail server and are not collected from emails stored directly on the victim’s device. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Automated Collection </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1119/" target="_blank"><u>T1119</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Upon execution, the JavaScript payload automatically collects all relevant information in stages. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Browser Session Hijacking </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1185/" target="_blank"><u>T1185</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>The JavaScript payload leverages the user’s authenticated browser session to make API requests as the user. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Archive Collected Data </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1560/" target="_blank"><u>T1560</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Emails are exfiltrated with GZIP compression. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 18: Discovery </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Account Discovery </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1087/" target="_blank"><u>T1087</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Stolen Global Access Lists provide the group with new users to target. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 19: Exfiltration </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Technique Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Use</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/" target="_blank"><u>T1048</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Victim information was exfiltrated over both HTTPS and DNS. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Asymmetric Encrypted Non-C2 Protocol </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/002/" target="_blank"><u>T1048.002</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Some payloads, especially ones with large amounts of data, were exfiltrated over HTTPS. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol: Exfiltration Over Unencrypted Non-C2 Protocol </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v19/techniques/T1048/003/" target="_blank"><u>T1048.003</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW76044448 BCX8">
<p>Some smaller bandwidth payloads were exfiltrated over DNS using Base32 encoding. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<h2><strong>Appendix B: MITRE D3FEND countermeasures </strong><a class="ck-anchor"></a></h2>
<p>See <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/#table20"><strong>Table 20</strong></a> for a mapping of several of the cybersecurity countermeasures mentioned in this advisory. <a class="ck-anchor"></a></p>
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="TableContainer Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<table dir="ltr" class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<caption><em><strong>Table 20: MITRE D3FEND Countermeasures </strong></em></caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Countermeasure Title</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>ID</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
<th role="columnheader">
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p class="text-align-center"><strong>Description</strong> </p>
</div>
</div>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Application Hardening </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ApplicationHardening" target="_blank"><u>D3-AH</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="ListContainerWrapper SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<ul type="disc">
<li>Organizations should immediately prioritize patching <a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66376" target="_blank"><u>CVE-2025-66376</u></a>.  </li>
<li>Organizations should promptly apply software updates to all email systems. </li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Isolate </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/tactic/d3f:Isolate/" target="_blank"><u>d3f:Isolate</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Organizations that cannot feasibly patch should use alternative mail clients. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Credential Hardening </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:CredentialHardening" target="_blank"><u>D3-CH</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Organizations should consider using a third-party authentication service that supports passkeys to mediate access to ZCS and other services that do not natively support passkeys. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Network Traffic Analysis </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficAnalysis" target="_blank"><u>D3-NTA</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Organizations should monitor for significant amounts of outbound data being sent to IPs associated with VPS providers not used by the organization. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>DNS Traffic Analysis </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:DNSTrafficAnalysis" target="_blank"><u>D3-DNSTA</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Organizations should monitor for frequent DNS queries to a suspicious domain for seemingly random subdomains. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Network Traffic Community Deviation </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:NetworkTrafficCommunityDeviation" target="_blank"><u>D3-NTCD</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="ListContainerWrapper SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<ul type="disc">
<li>Organizations should monitor for a sudden spike of connections to a server associated with a recently established domain. </li>
<li>Organizations should monitor for connections to internal services, such as webmail, from VPN providers. </li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Identifier Activity Analysis </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:IdentifierActivityAnalysis" target="_blank"><u>D3-IAA</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Organizations should search for the listed known IOCs. </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p>Process Analysis </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="OutlineElement Ltr SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<p><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ProcessAnalysis" target="_blank"><u>D3-PA</u></a> </p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="TableCellContent SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<div class="ListContainerWrapper SCXW46665017 BCX8">
<ul type="disc">
<li>Organizations should search ZCS log files for specific commands used by the malicious script. </li>
<li>Organizations should search the localStorage property in web browsers for the ZCS webmail client for “ZimbraWeb” Application Passcodes. </li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Message Analysis</td>
<td><a href="https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:MessageAnalysis">D3-MA</a></td>
<td>Organizations that suspect they have victims of this campaign should search for emails with a malicious payload to identify other victims.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Next.js Patches Nine Security Flaws Enabling SSRF, Authentication Bypass, and DoS Attacks]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Vercel has disclosed and patched nine security vulnerabilities in Next.js, the widely used React framework, addressing flaws that could enable server-side request forgery (SSRF), middleware authentication bypass, denial-of-service (DoS) attacks, and sensitive data exposure. All nine advisories we...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689374/it-security-nachrichten/nextjs-patches-nine-security-flaws-enabling-ssrf-authentication-bypass-and-dos-attacks/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689374/it-security-nachrichten/nextjs-patches-nine-security-flaws-enabling-ssrf-authentication-bypass-and-dos-attacks/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:41:05 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vercel has disclosed and patched nine security vulnerabilities in Next.js, the widely used React framework, addressing flaws that could enable server-side request forgery (SSRF), middleware authentication bypass, denial-of-service (DoS) attacks, and sensitive data exposure. All nine advisories were published two days ago by security researcher KarimPwnz and are now fixed in Next.js versions 15.5.21 and […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/next-js-patches-nine-security-flaws/">Next.js Patches Nine Security Flaws Enabling SSRF, Authentication Bypass, and DoS Attacks</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Framework Laptop 13 Pro: Teurer Speicher sorgt für Neu­konfigurationen bei Käufern]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Marktstart des Framework Laptop 13 Pro läuft erneut nicht so, wie sich das das Unternehmen und vermutlich auch die Käufer vorgestellt hatten. Nach der Verzögerung aufgrund von Problemen bei Touchpad und Bildschirm sind es nun extrem hohe Speicherpreise, die Framework zu Neukonfigurationen bei...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689360/it-nachrichten/framework-laptop-13-pro-teurer-speicher-sorgt-fuer-neukonfigurationen-bei-kaeufern/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689360/it-nachrichten/framework-laptop-13-pro-teurer-speicher-sorgt-fuer-neukonfigurationen-bei-kaeufern/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:34:01 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://pics.computerbase.de/1/2/3/9/3/9-698dbb9783618321/article-640x360.59a22bfe.jpg"><p>Der Marktstart des Framework Laptop 13 Pro läuft erneut nicht so, wie sich das das Unternehmen und vermutlich auch die Käufer vorgestellt hatten. Nach der Verzögerung aufgrund von Problemen bei Touchpad und Bildschirm sind es nun extrem hohe Speicherpreise, die Framework zu Neukonfigurationen bei einigen Käufern zwingen.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google transforms its data center architecture for agent era]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google’s data center team is racing to turn its infrastructure into a well-oiled machine for AI and the onslaught of agents. At this year’s Google I/O, CEO Sundar Pichai shared startling numbers: Google’s data centers processed about 3.2 quadrillion tokens a month, roughly seven times more than t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689013/it-security-nachrichten/google-transforms-its-data-center-architecture-for-agent-era/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689013/it-security-nachrichten/google-transforms-its-data-center-architecture-for-agent-era/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:23:05 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google’s data center team is racing to turn its infrastructure into a well-oiled machine for AI and the <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4175890/cisco-ai-traffic-is-radically-reshaping-wans.html">onslaught of agents</a>. At this year’s Google I/O, CEO Sundar Pichai shared startling numbers: Google’s data centers processed about 3.2 quadrillion tokens a month, roughly seven times more than the 480 trillion processed in May 2025.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Multiple agents work together, and now you’ve got millions, billions of users around the world potentially spinning off agents to help them do things,” said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/marklohmeyer/">Mark Lohmeyer</a>, vice president and general manager for AI and computing infrastructure at Google.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google’s new data-center blueprint includes updated hardware, software, and orchestration layers to keep always-running agents operational.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the LLM era, users sent prompts and received responses, and Google’s infrastructure was designed for latency and throughput. But <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4057121/network-and-cloud-implications-of-agentic-ai.html">agents could increase inference transactions</a> by up to 100 times non-agentic workloads, Lohmeyer said. Google’s redesigned AI data-center stack has the elasticity for agents to be widely distributed, run for long periods, and make decisions independently.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We’re delivering new platforms every year, each one optimized for what we think the world is going to need for the age of agents going forward,” Lohmeyer said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Efficient data flow is key so agents can act, reason, and decide faster. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google adjusted the <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2255921/gke-tutorial-get-started-with-google-kubernetes-engine.html">Google Kubernetes Engine</a> into an agent-native environment, where agents could be quickly spun up in sandboxes and containers. “From an infrastructure perspective, you need to spin up a bunch of TPUs or GPUs very rapidly. Then you need to be able to run them and spin them back down,” Lohmeyer said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google also made drastic improvements to its silicon to support its middleware changes. It recently <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4162004/google-bets-on-workload-specific-tpus-with-8t-and-8i-launch.html">introduced new AI chips</a>, with the TPU-8t for training, and TPU-8i for inference. The 8t chip has three times more computing power than the previous-generation Ironwood chip. The 8i chip has 384 megabytes of SRAM and 288GB of HBM3e memory, which is 50% more than the previous-generation chip.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The platform is optimized for KV cache (key-value cache), which stores important contextual information needed by agents to make decisions, which reduces the round trips to other memory and storage systems. “Being able to store more of the KV cache directly on the chip allows you to respond much more rapidly and cost-effectively,” Lohmeyer said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A new CPU called <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4086182/google-cloud-aims-for-more-cost-effective-arm-computing-with-axion-n4a.html">Axion N4A</a> is more power efficient at agentic workloads such as orchestration and tool calling, Lohmeyer said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google also made many network and storage improvements to cut training and inference time. A new technology called <a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/compute/tpu-8t-and-tpu-8i-technical-deep-dive">TPUDirect</a> can move data from storage directly into the memory of the TPU quickly by bypassing any orchestration overhead, Lohmeyer said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/networking/introducing-virgo-megascale-data-center-fabric">A networking technology called Virgo</a> can coordinate 1 million TPUs across a widely distributed network. It can also link up GPUs such as Nvidia’s latest CPU-GPU package called Vera Rubin. “In the case of Vera Rubin, we’ll be able to connect up to 960,000 GPUs leveraging Virgo,” Lohmeyer said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A new technology called <a href="https://docs.cloud.google.com/ai-hypercomputer/docs/workloads/pathways-on-cloud/pathways-intro">Pathways</a> is a distributed training framework that efficiently scales machine learning across millions of TPUs and GPUs. Pathways solves bottleneck issues typically associated with JAX, and both help coordinate across wide networks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The software to orchestrate these large-scale distributed training jobs is also just as important as the hardware that it runs on top of,” Lohmeyer said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Weighing Google’s AI data-center stack</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google is the only provider with its own data centers, software, hardware and models, said <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jckgld/">Jack Gold</a>, principal analyst at J. Gold Associates. Google can optimize each on a regular cadence, which “many data centers can’t easily afford given the high cost of new chips,” Gold said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google’s stack may not be best for every data center need compared to Nvidia’s general-purpose GPUs, CPUs, and networking. AWS and Microsoft are also creating their chips.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“There is no real risk of Nvidia being replaced by Google in a big way. But with an ever-expanding market, there is plenty of room for all players,” Gold said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/logan-wolfe/">Logan Wolfe</a>, partner at Kyndryl’s global AI strategy and sovereign transformation, advised enterprises to adopt a multi-cloud strategy to reduce risk from system failures, however superior an infrastructure may be. “I think that kind of hybrid and liquid infrastructure, we’re definitely getting there,” Wolfe said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The cost per token varies depending on the provider of inference, whether that’s Microsoft, Google, OpenAI or Anthropic. That will matter as AI moves from experimentation to a powerful tool that drives business changes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Ultimately it really comes down to how much money are we spending on AI to move a certain business outcome,” Wolfe said.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The new value architecture of the AI-native SaaS era]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The traditional methods of measuring success no longer tell the full story. Here’s what should replace them — and why.



In brief:




AI is transforming software as a service (SaaS), and the old ways of keeping score no longer apply.



Smart companies are evolving new metrics that provide deep...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688966/it-nachrichten/the-new-value-architecture-of-the-ai-native-saas-era/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688966/it-nachrichten/the-new-value-architecture-of-the-ai-native-saas-era/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:05:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The traditional methods of measuring success no longer tell the full story. Here’s what should replace them — and why.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In brief:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4146669/is-ai-the-end-of-saas-as-we-know-it.html">AI is transforming software as a service (SaaS)</a>, and the old ways of keeping score no longer apply.</li>



<li>Smart companies are evolving new metrics that provide deeper insight into how AI-native software is performing in a new marketplace.</li>



<li>These changes impact everything from pricing to valuations.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The transformation of the software-as-a-service (SaaS) industry toward AI-native operating companies is rapidly changing the unit of value across the industry.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The traditional metric of seats — which measured access — is rapidly giving way to credits designed to measure work performed. This evolution is upending the industry in multiple ways, impacting everything from pricing to enterprise valuations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While many companies still cling to seat-based metrics to measure growth, efficiency and durability, the future is likely to be one in which companies utilize a <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4184688/it-hurtles-toward-the-great-enterprise-pricing-reset.html">credit-centric metrics framework</a>, with seats and outcomes as the bookends of a spectrum.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why do software companies need new metrics?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Why the rethink, and why now? There are five major forces that are driving this shift:</p>



<ol start="1" class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="https://www.idc.com/resource-center/blog/is-saas-dead-rethinking-the-future-of-software-in-the-age-of-ai/"><strong>The unit of value is changing</strong></a><strong>.</strong> Seats measured who could access software, and credits measure what the software actually does. But in an AI-native world, agents don’t have seats; they have workloads. Over the past 18 months, every major SaaS platform has moved to some forms of credit or consumption unit.</li>



<li><strong>The cost of goods sold (COGS) is exploding.</strong> AI inference adds real per-unit costs that scale with usage. In an AI-native world, software companies can’t scale to infinite users at near‑zero marginal cost as before.</li>



<li><strong>Buying is moving up the org chart.</strong> AI-native applications shift purchasing to higher-level operators — such as line-of-business leaders or chief operating officers — which expands the market from software budgets to labor budgets. And because AI agents replace services as well as software, the total market opportunity is 3x to 10x larger than traditional SaaS.</li>



<li><strong>Time to value (TTV) is collapsing.</strong> With AI-native tools, customers start seeing meaningful results in weeks rather than quarters. Onboarding and setup are fast, workflows are pre-built, and there’s no need for extensive customer success or professional services — dramatically reducing implementation time and costs.</li>



<li><strong>Retention is bifurcating.</strong> AI forces clarity in a way that traditional SaaS couldn’t. Products that can provide value become even “stickier” and retain customers. Those that don’t churn faster. In an AI-native marketplace, the middle disappears.</li>
</ol>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How this shift is impacting pricing</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.ey.com/en_us/insights/strategy/grow-with-trusted-software-portfolio-management">Given how AI-native software is transforming the market</a>, the shift to more variable pricing options is inevitable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Seats won’t go away completely. Subscription pricing based on the number of users is stable and predictable and will continue to work for some customers. Tokens — the use of pass-through pricing for underlying compute — will fit those customers where the AI feature is commoditized or the buyer wants transparency into costs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Credits will likely become the dominant architecture because they provide a simple metric for both customers and providers. The vendor sets the conversation ratio between credits and underlying compute, shielding the customer from inference cost details. Credits are easy to understand and can be packaged into annual contracts for multiple features and products.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Finally, the industry will likely see <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2026-07-01-gartner-says-us-dollars-234-billion-in-enterprise-application-software-spend-is-at-risk-from-agentic-artificial-intelligence">some move toward outcome-based pricing</a> for results such as resolved tickets, recovered revenue or qualified leads. This strategy will mostly be limited to verticals where it is easy to prove AI impacted the result.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Where a software vendor sits on this spectrum is a signal of differentiation and pricing power. Credits are where most defensible AI-native businesses are landing because they balance customer predictability with vendor margin control.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How AI upends classic SaaS metrics</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When SaaS was in its infancy, companies settled on key metrics designed to answer a small set of core questions. Are we growing? Are customers using the product? Are we retaining and expanding accounts?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But as AI upends software itself, it is also requiring companies to adopt new metrics to track success. These new metrics fall into three primary buckets, rebuilt around the pricing spectrum described earlier and the trend toward credits as the primary frame:</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Revenue composition</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Committed credit annual recurring revenue (ARR) vs. burndown ARR: Measuring the credits sold on annual commitment vs. those consumed and replenished. This is the single most important split for valuation. Committed credits behave like subscription and burndown behaves like usage.</li>



<li>Credit utilization rate: The percentage of purchased credits consumed per period. This is a leading indicator of renewal sizing.</li>



<li>Credit burn velocity: How fast is a customer consuming their credits, and is that consumption increasing or decreasing quarter over quarter? This metric predicts expansion or contraction before it shows up in ARR.</li>



<li>Effective price per credit: The real revenue per credit after discounts, overage and rollover, which can detect revenue leakage and help companies set smarter guide rails.</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Margin reality</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Credit margin: The gross profit the company earns per credit after subtracting inference costs. This is the core economic unit for AI-native, usage-based businesses — the replacement for gross margin per seat used in SaaS.</li>



<li>Inference-adjusted gross margin: By carving out AI inference costs separately in the P&amp;L statement, you can see true AI margins, avoid hiding deterioration inside blended SaaS margins, and clearly distinguish AI economics from legacy SaaS economics.</li>



<li>Compute leverage ratio: This metric measures how efficiently the business converts compute spend into revenue. It shows whether your AI margins are improving as you scale.</li>



<li>AI-adjusted “Rule of 40”: This updated metric recalibrates the traditional growth and profitability benchmark to account for AI’s lower gross margins and variable inference costs, giving a more accurate picture of business health for AI-native companies.</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Behavioral and value signals</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Time-to-first outcome: Replaces traditional onboarding metrics. Tracks how fast a customer reaches their first measurable result.</li>



<li>Adoption: AI-native adoption is measured by workflow penetration and active agent density, not seat count. As AI replaces human-driven usage, the unit of adoption shifts from people to automated workflows and agents.</li>



<li>Net credit retention (NCR): Credit-volume retention across the customer base, tracked separately from net recurring revenue to avoid price-change impact.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Along with these new metrics, the industry’s transformation is prompting companies to retire or recalibrate old SaaS measures, including per-seat ARR as a primary key performance indicator (KPI), traditional magic number calibrated to subscription dynamics, unadjusted Rule of 40, customer success metrics tied to human touchpoints, and blended gross margin without AI COGS carve-outs.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What does this mean for enterprise value calculations?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As the internal metrics of success change, so do the ways the investment community measures growth and long-term viability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Increasingly, a company’s valuation multiple depends on whether its revenue behaves like committed subscription ARR or volatile usage ARR, and the commit‑to‑burndown ratio is the metric investors use to decide where the company fits.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For example, a business with 80% committed credit ARR could trade closer to subscription comps and one with 80% burndown could trade closer to usage comps even though both have the same types of customers. Being able to proactively explain the commit‑to‑burndown mix can help companies avoid undervaluation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In addition, utilization is expected to replace net promoter scores and seat usage as the primary predictor of churn or expansion. Low utilization guarantees downsizing at renewal, so companies must track utilization cohorts the same way SaaS tracks logo retention cohorts today.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We’re also seeing an inversion of the operating model, with R&amp;D and COGS moving up the P&amp;L and sales and marketing (S&amp;M) and customer success (CS) moving down or sideways. The net operating leverage profile is structurally different from classical SaaS, and the cost-to-scale curve looks different too.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Finally, credit margin engineering is a hidden value-creation lever. The gap between price per credit and cost per credit is set by the software vendor and can be optimized. Most operators have barely started managing this rigorously, and the ones who do will pull away on margin.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What this means for leaders, boards and investors</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The shift from classic SaaS metrics to new AI‑native measures isn’t cosmetic. It represents the seismic change the industry is experiencing as AI matures and transforms products and organizations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While these metrics — and perhaps others yet to be determined — may evolve over time, there is no doubt they are already changing how AI companies allocate capital, price products, incent sales teams, evaluate performance and communicate with investors.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s important to remember that SaaS metrics were practical tools for a specific era of software. As that era draws to a close, winning companies will choose new metrics that shape behavior and drive smart decision-making.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>The views reflected in this article are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Ernst &amp; Young LLP or other members of the global EY organization.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nvidia bets physical AI can solve healthcare robotics’ data problem]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Nvidia’s new Medical Physics Simulation framework treats healthcare robots as physical AI systems that need embodied experience to learn, not just code. Physical AI is the term Nvidia and much of the robotics industry now use to describe machines that have to learn how the world behaves through c...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688935/ai-nachrichten/nvidia-bets-physical-ai-can-solve-healthcare-robotics-data-problem/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688935/ai-nachrichten/nvidia-bets-physical-ai-can-solve-healthcare-robotics-data-problem/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 13:53:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nvidia’s new Medical Physics Simulation framework treats healthcare robots as physical AI systems that need embodied experience to learn, not just code. Physical AI is the term Nvidia and much of the robotics industry now use to describe machines that have to learn how the world behaves through contact, force, and consequence, rather than through […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/news/nvidia-bets-physical-ai-solve-healthcare-robotics-data-problem/">Nvidia bets physical AI can solve healthcare robotics’ data problem</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/">AI News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Stop asking AI nicely: Here’s how to get work-ready results every time]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Over the past few years, I have learned that basic prompts produce inconsistent, hallucination-prone results that no executive would trust in production. What turned the tide was my move to advanced prompting techniques. These weren’t theoretical experiments; they became a practical foundation fo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688796/it-nachrichten/stop-asking-ai-nicely-heres-how-to-get-work-ready-results-every-time/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688796/it-nachrichten/stop-asking-ai-nicely-heres-how-to-get-work-ready-results-every-time/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 13:07:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over the past few years, I have learned that basic prompts produce inconsistent, hallucination-prone results that no executive would trust in production. What turned the tide was my move to advanced prompting techniques. These weren’t theoretical experiments; they became a practical foundation for reliable, measurable outcomes. I want to share the techniques that consistently delivered the biggest gains in my projects, complete with real before-and-after examples, copy-paste templates, lessons from failures and guidance on when to evolve beyond prompting to agentic systems.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why advanced prompting still matters in enterprise settings</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sophisticated prompting remains essential for control, reliability and compliance. If you “ask nicely” and hope for the best, you need deterministic behavior, auditable reasoning and minimal risk of hallucination. Here’s what worked for me.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">1. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and its variants: Unlocking step-by-step reasoning</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>The problem:</strong> Models would jump to conclusions on complex analysis tasks, especially involving data interpretation or multi-step logic.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>What I did:</strong> I started explicitly instructing the model to “think step by step” and show its reasoning.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Before (basic prompt): </strong>“Analyze last quarter’s sales data and recommend three actions.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>After (CoT prompt):</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You’re a senior business analyst. Analyze the following sales data step by step: [data]. First, identify the key trends. Second, calculate the rates and anomalies. Third, link findings to business context. Finally, recommend the three prioritized actions with expected impact. Explain your reasoning at each step.”  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Results:</strong> Accuracy and depth improved dramatically.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Variants that worked well:</strong> Self-consistency. I ran the same CoT prompt multiple times and took the majority consensus. This reduced variability significantly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Template you can use:</strong></p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>You are [expert role]. Solve this problem by thinking step by step.

[Task or question]

For each step:

1. State your observation or calculation.

2. Explain the implication.

3. Proceed only when confident.

Final answer in this format: [structured output]</code></pre>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">2. Tree-of-Thoughts (ToT): Exploring multiple reasoning paths</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For truly complex decisions such as resource allocation or risk assessment, linear CoT isn’t enough. Tree-of-Thoughts lets the model generate and evaluate multiple branches.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Example:</strong> I was helping a client evaluate three potential vendor platforms for an AI deployment. A standard prompt gave a superficial comparison. With ToT</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Prompt Snippet:</strong></p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>Explore three different reasoning paths for selecting the best vendor platform:

Path 1: Focus on cost and scalability.

Path 2: Focus on security, compliance and integration.

Path 3: Focus on innovation and long-term roadmap.

For each path, evaluate pros/cons against our requirements [list].

Then, compare the paths and recommend the strongest overall option with justification.</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Outcome:</strong> The model surfaced nuanced trade-offs (e.g., one vendor had superior security, but higher integration cost).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>When to use:</strong> Strategic planning, troubleshooting or scenarios with high uncertainty and multiple viable approaches.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">3. ReAct (Reason+ Act) and prompt chaining: Moving toward agentic behavior</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the biggest leaps I have noticed comes from combining reasoning with tool use and chaining prompts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ReAct example</strong>: (used in data analytics workflow)</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>You are an AI analyst with access to tools. For the query below:

1. Reason about what information you need.

2. Choose the appropriate tool or action.

3. Observe the result.

4. Repeat until you can answer confidently.

Query: [user request]</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In practice, I chained this with retrieval tools. One automated quarterly compliance reporting; the system reasoned about required data, pulled relevant records, validated them, and generated the reports.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">4. Meta-prompting and self-reflection: Letting the model improve itself</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Use the model to refine its own prompt. This is a huge time-saver.</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>You are an expert prompt engineer. Improve the following prompt for clarity, structure and effectiveness with [target model]. Make it more precise while preserving intent.

Original prompt: [paste]

Provide the improved version and explain your changes.</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Self-reflection loops (asking the model to critique its own output and revise) are a game-changer for content generation and code-review tasks.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">5. Multimodal and structured output techniques</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With vision-enabled models, I started combining text with images (e.g., uploading architecture diagrams or dashboards).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Tip from experience:</strong> Be extremely specific in describing what the models should focus on.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Best practices I learned the hard way</h4>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Start simple, then layer complexity</strong>: Over-engineered prompts from Day One usually backfire.</li>



<li><strong>Model specific tuning:</strong> Some models respond better to XML delimiters; others to explicit reasoning.</li>



<li><strong>Evaluation and versioning:</strong> Treat prompts like code if you track versions and run automated evals.</li>



<li><strong>Security guardrails:</strong> Always include instructions against prompt injections and respect data boundaries.</li>



<li><strong>When to stop prompting</strong>: For repetitive, high-stakes workflows, move to full agents or an orchestration framework.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Final takeaways for technical leaders</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Advanced prompt engineering has now become a core competency for anyone responsible for enterprise AI outcomes. Start by picking one technique and apply it rigorously to a real business problem. Document before/ after and you will notice why it’s worth mastering.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The field continues evolving towards more automated and agentic systems, but the ability to precisely direct AI reasoning remains foundational.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Switch to Android: Google-App erleichtert den Wechsel vom iPhone zu Android – unterstützt neue Datentypen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google will mit dem Framework Switch to Android den Wechsel vom iPhone zu einem Android-Gerät so leicht wie nur möglich machen - und bringt jetzt im Zuge der Galaxy-Vorstellung neue Möglichkeiten: Jetzt soll es wechselwilligen Nutzern noch leichter gemacht werden, möglichst viele Daten vom alten ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688794/it-nachrichten/switch-to-android-google-app-erleichtert-den-wechsel-vom-iphone-zu-android-unterstuetzt-neue-datentypen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688794/it-nachrichten/switch-to-android-google-app-erleichtert-den-wechsel-vom-iphone-zu-android-unterstuetzt-neue-datentypen/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 13:07:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="640" height="361" src="https://www.googlewatchblog.de/wp-content/uploads/switch-to-android-1024x578.jpg" class="attachment-large size-large wp-post-image" alt="switch to android" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://www.googlewatchblog.de/wp-content/uploads/switch-to-android-1024x578.jpg 1024w, https://www.googlewatchblog.de/wp-content/uploads/switch-to-android-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.googlewatchblog.de/wp-content/uploads/switch-to-android-768x433.jpg 768w, https://www.googlewatchblog.de/wp-content/uploads/switch-to-android-640x361.jpg 640w, https://www.googlewatchblog.de/wp-content/uploads/switch-to-android-800x451.jpg 800w, https://www.googlewatchblog.de/wp-content/uploads/switch-to-android.jpg 1500w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px"><br>Google will mit dem Framework <strong>Switch to Android</strong> den Wechsel vom iPhone zu einem Android-Gerät so leicht wie nur möglich machen - und bringt jetzt im Zuge der Galaxy-Vorstellung neue Möglichkeiten: Jetzt soll es wechselwilligen Nutzern noch leichter gemacht werden, möglichst viele Daten vom alten Gerät zum neuen Android-Smartphone mitzunehmen. Viel leichter kann man das wohl noch machen.</p>
<p>Mehr lesen: <a href="https://www.googlewatchblog.de/2026/07/switch-to-android-google-app-erleichtert-den-wechsel-vom-iphone-zu-android-unterstuetzt-neue-datentypen/">Switch to Android: Google-App erleichtert den Wechsel vom iPhone zu Android – unterstützt neue Datentypen</a></p>
<hr>
<p></p><center><a href="https://www.google.com/preferences/source?q=googlewatchblog.de"><img src="https://www.googlewatchblog.de/wp-content/uploads/googlebevorzugt.webp" alt="GoogleWatchBlog als bevorzugte Quelle bei Google hinzufügen" width="284" height="90"></a></center><br><center><strong>Keine Google-News mehr verpassen:</strong> <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqLggKIihDQklTR0FnTWFoUUtFbWR2YjJkc1pYZGhkR05vWW14dlp5NWtaU2dBUAE?hl=de"><strong>GoogleWatchBlog bei Google News abonnieren</strong></a></center>
<hr>
<p></p><center><a href="https://ssl-vg03.met.vgwort.de/na/7d3f20f691954690adb8348b2c24b7bf"><img alt="vgwort" src="https://ssl-vg03.met.vgwort.de/na/7d3f20f691954690adb8348b2c24b7bf" width="16" height="16"></a></center>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.googlewatchblog.de/2026/07/switch-to-android-google-app-erleichtert-den-wechsel-vom-iphone-zu-android-unterstuetzt-neue-datentypen/">Switch to Android: Google-App erleichtert den Wechsel vom iPhone zu Android – unterstützt neue Datentypen</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.googlewatchblog.de/">GoogleWatchBlog</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Framework Desktop: Mit Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 495 sind sehr teure 192 GB RAM drin]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Im Rahmen des AMD-Advancing-AI-Events wird ein Framework Desktop mit einem Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 495 inklusive Radeon 8065-iGPU und 192 GB Arbeitsspeicher vorgestellt. Laut Framework ist es das erste System mit diesem Prozessor und einer so hohen RAM-Ausstattung. Mit Blick auf den Preis gibt es aber ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688725/it-nachrichten/framework-desktop-mit-ryzen-ai-max-pro-495-sind-sehr-teure-192-gb-ram-drin/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688725/it-nachrichten/framework-desktop-mit-ryzen-ai-max-pro-495-sind-sehr-teure-192-gb-ram-drin/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:34:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://pics.computerbase.de/1/2/3/9/3/2-70835d5c9930ee11/article-640x360.c2f24edc.jpg"><p>Im Rahmen des AMD-Advancing-AI-Events wird ein Framework Desktop mit einem Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 495 inklusive Radeon 8065-iGPU und 192 GB Arbeitsspeicher vorgestellt. Laut Framework ist es das erste System mit diesem Prozessor und einer so hohen RAM-Ausstattung. Mit Blick auf den Preis gibt es aber schon vorab eine Warnung.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[ANCHOR-CI could fix 20 years of broken government-industry collaboration]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The government spent the past two decades learning what private sector partners have always known: cyber resilience requires everyone in the room. ANCHOR-CI is proof that the lessons may finally stick.
The post ANCHOR-CI could fix 20 years of broken government-industry collaboration appeared firs...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688703/it-security-nachrichten/anchor-ci-could-fix-20-years-of-broken-government-industry-collaboration/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688703/it-security-nachrichten/anchor-ci-could-fix-20-years-of-broken-government-industry-collaboration/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:26:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The government spent the past two decades learning what private sector partners have always known: cyber resilience requires everyone in the room. ANCHOR-CI is proof that the lessons may finally stick.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cyberscoop.com/cisa-anchor-ci-critical-infrastructure-framework-op-ed/">ANCHOR-CI could fix 20 years of broken government-industry collaboration</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cyberscoop.com/">CyberScoop</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Framework’s premium laptop is shipping with less RAM]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[RAMageddon has claimed yet another victim, with Framework now announcing a "major and unfortunate" pricing update for its upcoming premium laptop - which also impacts folks who preordered it. Memory configurations for the Laptop 13 Pro have been adjusted after Framework says it received cost upda...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688547/it-nachrichten/frameworks-premium-laptop-is-shipping-with-less-ram/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688547/it-nachrichten/frameworks-premium-laptop-is-shipping-with-less-ram/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:43:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[RAMageddon has claimed yet another victim, with Framework now announcing a "major and unfortunate" pricing update for its upcoming premium laptop - which also impacts folks who preordered it. Memory configurations for the Laptop 13 Pro have been adjusted after Framework says it received cost updates from its memory supplier that "are more than double […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI success requires a full-stack CIO]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Every CIO I speak with today is wrestling with some version of the same question: How do we move faster with AI and deliver on our commitments?



It’s an understandable concern. Boards and CEOs are asking about AI. Business leaders are experimenting with use cases. Employees are discovering tool...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688546/it-nachrichten/ai-success-requires-a-full-stack-cio/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688546/it-nachrichten/ai-success-requires-a-full-stack-cio/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:43:10 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every CIO I speak with today is wrestling with some version of the same question: How do we move faster with AI and deliver on our commitments?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s an understandable concern. <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4171959/ceos-top-priorities-for-it-leaders-today-2.html">Boards and CEOs are asking about AI</a>. Business leaders are experimenting with use cases. Employees are discovering tools daily, while technology vendors promise unprecedented gains in productivity, innovation, and competitive advantage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After hundreds of conversations with technology executives over the past year, I’ve become convinced that speed isn’t the real issue. The organizations pulling away from the pack aren’t necessarily adopting AI faster than everyone else. They’re executing more effectively — a subtle distinction that represents one of the defining leadership challenges of the AI era.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Technology has never been the hardest part of transformation. People, priorities, culture, and operating models are the biggest challenges. The ability to translate bold boardroom aspirations into thousands of thoughtful decisions made every day by architects, engineers, product managers, analysts, and business leaders is where competitive advantage is created. AI may be accelerating the pace of change, but it hasn’t changed that fundamental truth.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve met plenty of executives who are exceptional in the boardroom. They know how to frame a vision, <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/272180/relationship-building-networking-how-to-wow-your-board-of-directors.html">influence a board</a>, and build confidence among investors and business leaders. I’ve also met remarkable technologists who instinctively understand the architectural decisions, engineering tradeoffs, and implementation details that determine how great ideas become reality. Modern CIOs, however, must move comfortably between both worlds. Afshean Talasaz is one who stands out among this rare breed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Long before becoming CIO of Colonial Pipeline, Talasaz built his career from the ground up as a business professional, data scientist, and technologist. He has designed enterprise platforms, built AI capabilities, led technology organizations, and partnered closely with executive leadership teams on business transformation. Today, as an executive in residence with our Practitioners for Practitioners (P4P) community, he helps CIOs and business leaders navigate one of the most significant technology shifts of our generation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While Talasaz brings deep knowledge of data and AI to the table, his greatest strength is his ability to create strategy and connect it with execution. He can spend the morning discussing enterprise reinvention with the board and the afternoon debating architectural principles with the teams responsible for bringing that vision to life.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That versatility gives Talasaz a unique lens on how CIOs <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178006/state-of-the-cio-2026-cios-set-the-course-for-ai-roi.html">can deliver value with AI</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Software companies have a term for engineers who understand every layer of the technology stack: full-stack developers. Listen to Talasaz and it becomes evident that the AI era requires something similar from technology leaders: a full-stack CIO.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The full-stack CIO: Leading with clarity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A full-stack CIO understands how every layer of the enterprise influences the next. They recognize that every strategic priority becomes a portfolio investment, every investment shapes an operating model, every operating model influences architecture, every architecture choice informs product decisions, every product decision shapes engineering priorities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best CIOs understand both ends of that journey. The extraordinary ones understand everything in between.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And those who execute best lead with clarity, Talasaz says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Everyone, from executives to middle managers to the people writing code, should be able to explain what we’re trying to achieve,” he emphasizes. “Clarity isn’t that we’ve handed out the PowerPoint. It’s that people genuinely understand where we’re going and can articulate it in their own language.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the unintended consequences of the AI boom is that organizations are beginning to confuse activity with alignment. They have AI councils, AI governance committees, AI innovation labs, AI centers of excellence, AI pilots, and AI roadmaps. Yet if you stop ten people in the hallway and ask a deceptively simple question, What business problem are we actually trying to solve? you’ll often hear ten different answers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a result, architects optimize for one objective while product teams optimize for another. Business units pursue opportunities that seem perfectly reasonable from their perspective. Engineers make thoughtful technical decisions based on the information available to them. Individually, none of those decisions are necessarily wrong. Collectively, however, they create organizational drift. AI doesn’t create that problem. It simply accelerates the consequences.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And while AI can be a force multiplier for the positive when every decision is guided by a shared understanding of where the organization is headed, it can also be a force multiplier for the negative, resulting in an organization simply moving faster in different directions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When we have the fundamentals right, the tech infrastructure, the operating models, the nuances of how our business actually runs, we get the impacts of AI in a positive way,” Talasaz says. “When we don’t have those in place, AI can amplify the gaps or mute the benefits.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At a time when so much of the conversation surrounding AI is focused on algorithms, agents, and automation, it’s an important reminder that organizations don’t execute strategy; people do.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Reducing organizational friction</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most executives are familiar with the concept of VUCA that characterizes today’s business environment. But Talasaz stresses the importance of turning this concern inward: “If the world outside our organizations is becoming more volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous, what are we, as leaders, doing to the inside of our organizations?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Leaders spend enormous amounts of time helping their organizations respond to external disruption but comparatively little time asking whether they are inadvertently re-creating those same conditions internally in response to those external needs. Are we reducing uncertainty or introducing more of it? Are we simplifying work or adding unnecessary complexity? Are we helping people focus on what matters most, or asking them to navigate competing priorities and shifting expectations?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Talasaz refers to this phenomenon as double VUCA — something I’ve witnessed repeatedly while working with CIOs over the past decade. Organizations often assume they’re struggling because of technology limitations when the real constraint is organizational friction. Teams wait for decisions. Priorities shift faster than roadmaps. Governance grows heavier. New committees are formed to solve problems created by existing committees. Everyone is working harder, yet the organization somehow feels slower.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI amplifies both outcomes. Organizations with clarity become dramatically more effective because AI accelerates good decisions. Organizations without clarity simply accelerate confusion.</p>



<h1 class="wp-block-heading">Operating model as strategy enabler</h1>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI governance is one way to achieve greater clarity, but as Talasaz says, governance shouldn’t primarily exist inside policy manuals that few people read.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead, AI governance should be embedded in the daily rhythms of the organization, shaping how teams collaborate, how decisions are made, how products move from ideas into production, and how innovation happens safely without requiring constant escalation. In other words, it’s all about your operating model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“If you had to pick one thing that isn’t technology, your operating model is the most important element for executing data and AI at scale,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best operating models create enough clarity that capable people can make thousands of decisions independently and confidently, without having to wait for permission. By embedding good governance into the way it works, the organization becomes faster.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This advice echoes something I’ve heard repeatedly from some of the world’s most respected CIOs: High-performing organizations aren’t built on tighter control; they’re built on greater trust, supported by clear principles, shared expectations, and operating models that enable responsible decision-making at every level of the enterprise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Talasaz points out that technology leaders tend to speak in terms of <em>transformation</em>. He suggests CIOs consider a different word: <em>reinvention.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As he explains, transformation implies replacing what exists today with something new. Reinvention starts with a more clear-eyed and practical premise: Some things absolutely must change; others represent years, sometimes decades, of accumulated expertise, customer trust, operational discipline, and competitive advantage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Reinvention is about building on those strengths while also creating new ways to deliver value. The leaders making the greatest progress in their AI journeys seem to recognize that it’s less about abandoning the past than thoughtfully preparing the organization for the future.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Closing the gap between strategy and execution</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Full-stack CIOs must be able to map out the various layers of execution and planning that need to be done at every level of the organization to be successful. To help with this, Talasaz has developed a data and AI framework that draws on his own experiences “from the keyboard to the boardroom.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As Talasaz sees it, too many organizations have been doing good work in isolation. “They’re doing a lot of the right things,” he says. “They’re just not connected.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Boards may be discussing growth while business leaders redesign customer experiences. Product teams may be prioritizing new capabilities while architects modernize platforms. Data teams may be improving quality while engineers focus on delivery. Every group makes meaningful progress within its own domain, yet somewhere between strategy and execution, the connective tissue begins to disappear. Talasaz’s framework brings those connecting points to the forefront.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Crucially, the framework doesn’t begin with technology or AI or even with data. It begins with the experiences the organization hopes to create for its customers, employees, or partners. Many AI initiatives start with the question, “What can this technology do?” And indeed, we need to be inspired by the possibilities and challenged to think differently by what the technology can do. But, Talasaz emphasizes, we also need to ask what experiences we need to deliver for our business and how the technology can make that a reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The framework challenges CIOs to answer that question first. Only after the experiences are clearly defined does the conversation move to the capabilities required to deliver it, the business activities that support those capabilities, the AI and data products that enable them, and finally the data foundation that makes everything possible.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This shift in perspective ensures that, rather than allowing technology investments to search for business value, the business experience defines the technology required to deliver it. For CIOs, that’s more than a planning exercise. It’s a fundamentally different way of leading.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Over the coming months, the P4P community will be convening a series of small CxO roundtables to explore these issues and work more deeply with Afshean Talasaz’s 6×6 Data and AI Framework. CIOs and other enterprise leaders interested in participating are welcome to <a href="mailto:droberts@ouellette-online.com?subject=P4P:%206x6%20Framework%20Roundtable">reach out to me directly</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Determining the ROI of AI requires data that most companies lack]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Leadership wants to scale AI. Budgets are tripling. Adoption is up.



Then the CFO asks the question every board now asks: which of these initiatives is actually profitable?



Most organizations cannot answer that question, not because they lack visibility into cost, but because the cost data t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688477/ai-nachrichten/determining-the-roi-of-ai-requires-data-that-most-companies-lack/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688477/ai-nachrichten/determining-the-roi-of-ai-requires-data-that-most-companies-lack/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:07:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Leadership wants to scale AI. Budgets are tripling. Adoption is up.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then the CFO asks the question every board now asks: which of these initiatives is actually profitable?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most organizations cannot answer that question, not because they lack visibility into cost, but because the cost data they have was never designed to produce that answer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Applying lessons learned from <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4147766/cloud-at-20-cost-complexity-and-control.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4147766/cloud-at-20-cost-complexity-and-control.html">managing cloud spend</a> won’t be a fix for the AI and ROI quandary. True, cloud taught a generation of CFOs that billing without business context is noise. So to get <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4061122/cloud-computing-has-an-roi-problem.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4061122/cloud-computing-has-an-roi-problem.html">cloud ROI</a>, they stitched two data sources together: cost data plus business data. AWS reveals which account, which region, which tag, which resource. Merge in customer and product mappings on top and the ROI of the cloud spend comes into focus.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But AI is harder. It requires three data sources: cost, business, and telemetry—the automatic collection of data from disparate sources that helps to clarify the whole picture of what happened and why. An executive or engineering lead can have AI invoices and customer revenue. But they have no way to connect them to business value. The token count on the OpenAI invoice does not specify which customer triggered which call, which feature it served, or whether the prompt produced a business outcome. That data does not exist in the provider’s billing.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI providers won’t fix this problem</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The situation is not likely to change anytime soon because AI providers are not in the business of attributing an enterprise’s costs to that enterprise’s customers. Instead, AI providers are in the business of selling tokens. The granularity they expose is the granularity their billing systems require, not the granularity a CFO requires.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not convinced? Compare what AWS gives you to what an AI provider gives you.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AWS billing exposes resource IDs, account hierarchies, region, SKU, tag metadata, usage by the minute. Every dollar can be attributed to a workload, a team, a customer segment if it was tagged correctly. The data is rich enough that mature FinOps teams built unit economics on top of it years ago.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An AI provider invoice gives you tokens consumed by model, with optional grouping by API key. That is the resolution. No request-level attribution. No customer ID. No feature mapping. No prompt outcome. No retry identification. Multi-step agent workflows collapse into a token count. Imagine a large bank receives a multi-million dollar AI invoice each month. But it has no visibility into what parts of the business were responsible for what parts of the cost so cannot allocate them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If an enterprise wants to know what AI cost drove which customer or feature, it has to capture that data itself, inside an application, before the call leaves it. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Three required sources</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Building AI ROI measurement requires three data sources, stitched together in a single model.</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Cost data, normalized across providers.</strong> Every AI provider delivers cost differently. OpenAI invoices in one taxonomy, Anthropic in another, fine-tuning vendors and inference platforms each in their own. Cloud GPU costs sit in AWS or Azure billing. Vector database costs land in Pinecone or Snowflake invoices. None interoperate by default. Normalization is necessary but not sufficient. It will put all your AI costs in one schema. It does not tell you what they produced.</li>



<li><strong>Application-layer telemetry. </strong>This is the source most organizations are missing, and the one that makes AI ROI structurally different from cloud ROI. It requires instrumenting AI calls inside your application across six categories: request-level tracing tied to a customer or session ID; feature attribution tied to the product surface that triggered the call; agent-step capture for multi-step workflows; retry and fallback identification so recovery costs don’t get attributed to primary calls; model selection logging that records which model was chosen and why; and outcome capture that ties each call to whether it produced business value. None of this data exists in the provider’s billing. All of it has to be captured at the moment the call is made and stored in a system that can be stitched to the cost data.</li>



<li><strong>Business data. </strong>Revenue, customer segments, product hierarchies, and feature usage. The same business data already feeding your CRM and analytics stack, mapped to the customers and features the telemetry layer attributes calls to.</li>
</ol>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Stitched together, the three sources produce the unit economics every AI investment decision now requires: cost per customer interaction, margin per feature, profitability per agent workflow, ROI per model choice. None of these can be calculated from billing data alone. None can be calculated from telemetry alone. They require all three sources, modeled together in a way that maps cost to outcome.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why agentic AI makes this urgent</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Single-call inference is the easy case. One request, one cost, one customer, one outcome.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Agentic workflows are different. An agent decomposes a task into multiple steps. Each step calls a model. Some steps fall back to a different model when the first fails. Some steps retry on a poor result. Some steps invoke external tools that themselves cost money. A single user request can produce dozens of inference calls across multiple providers, with the cost compounding in ways the provider invoice cannot disaggregate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If telemetry does not capture agent-step granularity, no one will know which steps are profitable. Aggregate costs will show up three weeks later in the invoice. By then, the workflow has been running at scale, customers are onboarded, and unprofitable paths have been retried thousands of times.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When agents make the calls, the volume of cost-generating events without business context attached grows by an order of magnitude. The window for instrumenting this before it becomes unmanageable is closing.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What changes when the three sources come together</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once the three sources are stitched together, the AI investment conversation changes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Five different ways to build the same AI capability stop looking equivalent. They converge on adoption metrics and diverge by 10x on cost. The team picks the approach that delivers a similar business outcome at one-fifth the cost, because the team can finally see the difference. Product teams design features with margin awareness from the architecture phase, not from the post-launch budget review. Engineering teams choose model architectures with cost-per-outcome data alongside latency and quality. Leadership evaluates AI initiatives the way they evaluate any other capital allocation: on unit economics, not on the engagement chart. Aggregated invoices track the cost per customer interaction. Engagement metrics reveal margin per feature. Gut-instinct model selection is checked against real cost-per-outcome model selection results. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Within seconds, everyone can see which AI features are profitable, which should scale, and which should be killed. This is the insight everyone is looking for and companies that achieve it will optimize the benefits of AI.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The build trap</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI costs are compounding now. The board is not waiting 18 months for an internal project to reach production.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The temptation to build it anyway has never been sharper. AI coding tools have changed what a small engineering team can ship in a quarter. The instrumentation layer looks tractable. The cost normalization looks like a weekend project. The semantic model feels like something a senior engineer could draft over a sprint.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is a trap. Three reasons.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Volume is the first. A production AI footprint generates millions of telemetry events per hour, and that volume scales with agentic adoption. Real-time ingestion, correlation, and attribution at that scale is not the same problem as <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4078884/what-is-vibe-coding-ai-writes-the-code-so-developers-can-think-big.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4078884/what-is-vibe-coding-ai-writes-the-code-so-developers-can-think-big.html">vibe coding</a> a prototype in an afternoon. It is a permanent operational system that has to be right every minute of every day.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The vendor landscape is the second. Cost data arrives in delayed billing windows from providers with non-interoperable schemas. Schemas change without notice. New AI providers enter the landscape monthly, each with its own taxonomy and metering. The system is not built once. It is maintained against a moving target that moves faster than most internal release cycles.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The third is what the first two add up to: this is business-critical infrastructure. The CFO and the board are going to make capital allocation decisions on the data this system produces. When schema drift goes unnoticed for two weeks, when an agent telemetry stream stops correlating to a vendor that quietly changed its billing API, the cost of being wrong is not a sprint of cleanup. It is a quarter of misallocated capital.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The build-vs.-buy question for engineering leaders has changed. It’s not “can we build this?” The honest answer is yes. The real question is whether the marginal hour of your strongest engineers is best spent stitching cost data to telemetry to business outcomes, or building the AI products that produce the revenue the cost data is measuring.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The capability is reproducible in weeks. The choice is whether to spend the next 18 months building it, or the next 18 months acting on it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>—</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/blogs/new-tech-forum"><strong><em>New Tech Forum</em></strong></a><em><strong> provides a venue for technology leaders—including vendors and other outside contributors—to explore and discuss emerging enterprise technology in unprecedented depth and breadth. The selection is subjective, based on our pick of the technologies we believe to be important and of greatest interest to InfoWorld readers. InfoWorld does not accept marketing collateral for publication and reserves the right to edit all contributed content. Send all </strong></em><em><strong>inquiries to </strong></em><a href="mailto:doug_dineley@foundryco.com"><strong><em>doug_dineley@foundryco.com</em></strong></a><em><strong>.</strong></em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Agent Framework bietet ein Harness für .NET und Python]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Das Agent Framework bringt nun ein vorgefertigtes Harness mit, um aus großen Sprachmodellen Agenten zu machen.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688470/it-nachrichten/microsoft-agent-framework-bietet-ein-harness-fuer-net-und-python/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688470/it-nachrichten/microsoft-agent-framework-bietet-ein-harness-fuer-net-und-python/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:06:10 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Das Agent Framework bringt nun ein vorgefertigtes Harness mit, um aus großen Sprachmodellen Agenten zu machen.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[India Tightens Social Media Rules to Protect Children Online]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[India online safety rules are being strengthened as the government steps up measures to protect children and other users from harmful digital content, cyber risks and emerging threats linked to artificial intelligence. The government said its policies are aimed at ensuring an open, safe, trusted ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688433/it-security-nachrichten/india-tightens-social-media-rules-to-protect-children-online/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688433/it-security-nachrichten/india-tightens-social-media-rules-to-protect-children-online/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:56:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="1536" height="1024" src="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/India-online-safety-rules.webp" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="India online safety rules" decoding="async" srcset="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/India-online-safety-rules.webp 1536w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/India-online-safety-rules-300x200.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/India-online-safety-rules-1024x683.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/India-online-safety-rules-768x512.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/India-online-safety-rules-600x400.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/India-online-safety-rules-150x100.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/India-online-safety-rules-750x500.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/India-online-safety-rules-1140x760.webp 1140w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/India-online-safety-rules.webp 1536w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/India-online-safety-rules-300x200.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/India-online-safety-rules-1024x683.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/India-online-safety-rules-768x512.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/India-online-safety-rules-600x400.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/India-online-safety-rules-150x100.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/India-online-safety-rules-750x500.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/India-online-safety-rules-1140x760.webp 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 1536px) 100vw, 1536px" title="India Tightens Social Media Rules to Protect Children Online 1"></p><p class="PDq2pG_selectionAnchorContainer" data-start="257" data-end="713">India online safety rules are being strengthened as the government steps up measures to protect children and other users from harmful digital content, cyber risks and emerging threats linked to <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/?s=artificial+intelligence" target="_blank" rel="noopener">artificial intelligence</a>. The government said its policies are aimed at ensuring an open, safe, trusted and accountable internet, with recent measures focusing on child safety, privacy protection, faster content removal and stronger platform responsibilities.</p>
<p data-start="715" data-end="1123">The Information Technology Act, 2000, and the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, form the core legal framework governing online safety and intermediary responsibilities in India. The government has also <a href="https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2287579&amp;reg=48&amp;lang=1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">highlighted</a> the <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/dpdp-and-cybersecurity-rethinking-data-risk/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Digital Personal Data Protection Act</a>, 2023, and recent amendments to the IT Rules as part of its broader approach to digital safety.</p>

<h3 class="" data-section-id="1o0spuj" data-start="1125" data-end="1192"><span role="text"><strong data-start="1129" data-end="1192">India Online Safety Rules Tighten Platform Responsibilities</strong></span></h3>
<p data-start="1194" data-end="1433">Under the IT Rules, intermediaries are required to observe due diligence and inform users that they must not host, display, upload, modify, publish, transmit, update or share content that is harmful to children or violates applicable laws.</p>
<p data-start="1435" data-end="1671">Recent amendments require <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/child-safety-online-eu-weighs-social-media-age/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">social media platforms</a> and other intermediaries to remove unlawful content within three hours of receiving an order from a competent court or a reasoned intimation from the appropriate government or its agency.</p>
<p data-start="1673" data-end="2054">The government has also o<a href="https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2287646&amp;reg=48&amp;lang=1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">utlined specific obligations</a> related to content involving nudity, impersonation and other sensitive material. In cases involving certain complaints about content featuring full or partial nudity, exposed private areas or artificially morphed images, intermediaries must take reasonable and practicable measures to remove or disable access within two hours.</p>

<h3 data-section-id="1g47dy1" data-start="2056" data-end="2116"><span role="text"><strong data-start="2060" data-end="2116">Government Targets Harmful Content and OTT Platforms</strong></span></h3>
<p data-start="2118" data-end="2530">The government said it has taken action against online platforms and OTT services over unlawful and obscene content. In the last two years, 50 OTT platforms have been disabled for public access in India for displaying obscene content and violating provisions including Sections 67 and 67A of the IT Act, Section 294 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986.</p>
<p data-start="2532" data-end="2874">The government also said it has taken note of reports alleging the dissemination of advertisements linked to <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/ai-child-safety-in-india/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">child sexual abuse material</a> (CSAM) on social media platforms and sought a detailed report from the concerned intermediary. The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights has also issued notices to the concerned platforms.</p>

<h3 data-section-id="cy5duc" data-start="2876" data-end="2933"><span role="text"><strong data-start="2880" data-end="2933">India Strengthens AI-Generated Content Safeguards</strong></span></h3>
<p data-start="2935" data-end="3279">The government has also expanded its regulatory focus to address risks associated with <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/ai-content-generation-systems/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">AI-generated content</a> and synthetically generated information. Amendments to the IT Rules introduce requirements for clear labelling and traceable metadata for permissible AI-generated content, allowing users to identify synthetically generated material.</p>
<p data-start="3281" data-end="3547">The framework also strengthens platform accountability and requires greater user awareness about the legal consequences of unlawful AI-generated content. The rules specifically cover harmful material including CSAM, non-consensual intimate imagery and impersonation.</p>
<p data-start="3549" data-end="3807">Platforms are required to deploy reasonable and appropriate technical measures, including automated tools or other mechanisms, to prevent users from creating, modifying, publishing or sharing synthetically generated information that violates applicable laws.</p>
<p data-start="3809" data-end="4065">Significant Social Media Intermediaries are also required to make reasonable efforts to deploy technical measures to proactively identify content depicting rape, child sexual abuse or conduct, as well as content identical to information previously removed.</p>

<h3 data-section-id="1iex218" data-start="4067" data-end="4130"><span role="text"><strong data-start="4071" data-end="4130">Child Privacy and Digital Addiction Remain Key Concerns</strong></span></h3>
<p data-start="4132" data-end="4474">The Digital Personal <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-is-data/" title="Data" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29094">Data</a> Protection Act, 2023, provides a framework for protecting children's privacy online. It mandates parental consent for processing children's personal data and prohibits practices considered detrimental to children's well-being, including tracking, behavioural monitoring and targeted advertising directed at children.</p>
<p data-start="4476" data-end="4847">The government has also highlighted digital addiction as a serious challenge affecting children and young people. The Economic Survey 2025-26 noted potential impacts on cognitive development, academic performance, workplace productivity, social connectedness and mental health, alongside <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-are-risks-in-cybersecurity/" title="risks" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29095">risks</a> linked to cyberbullying, compulsive gaming, social media and online gambling.</p>

<h3 data-section-id="pzt1k1" data-start="4849" data-end="4904"><span role="text"><strong data-start="4853" data-end="4904">Cyber Awareness Reaches 11.37 Lakh Participants</strong></span></h3>
<p data-start="4906" data-end="5315">Alongside regulatory measures, the government is expanding <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/cybersecurity-skill-gap-awareness-education/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">cyber awareness </a>initiatives through the Information Security Education and Awareness project. So far, 6,650 awareness workshops have been conducted nationwide, reaching more than 11.37 lakh participants, including students, teachers, law enforcement officials, government personnel and members of the public.</p>
<p data-start="5317" data-end="5663">The government has also highlighted digital safety initiatives in education. The PRAGYATA Guidelines provide a framework for safe online learning and responsible use of social media and electronic devices. CBSE has introduced digital etiquette and <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/" title="cybersecurity" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29093">cybersecurity</a> training initiatives, while NCERT has incorporated cyber safety into its curriculum.</p>
<p data-start="5665" data-end="5951" data-is-last-node="" data-is-only-node="">The measures were outlined by Union Minister for Electronics and Information Technology Ashwini Vaishnaw in the Lok Sabha on July 22, 2026, as the government continues to strengthen its approach to c child protection and accountability across India's digital ecosystem.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8597-1: Linux kernel (IBM) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688420/unix-server/usn-8597-1-linux-kernel-ibm-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688420/unix-server/usn-8597-1-linux-kernel-ibm-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:46:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose sensitive information (kernel memory). (CVE-2023-45896)

It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - ATM drivers;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - RNBD block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clocksource drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - CPU idle management framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EFI core;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVME drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - RapidIO drivers;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - RPMSG subsystem;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Texas Instruments SoC drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FAT file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - JFS file system;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Proc file system;
  - Pstore file system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) subsystem;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Memory Management;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Netfilter;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Kernel kexec() syscall;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Networking core;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - AppArmor security module;
  - ALSA framework;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
(CVE-2022-49803, CVE-2022-49961, CVE-2022-50073, CVE-2022-50116,
CVE-2023-52682, CVE-2023-52737, CVE-2023-53545, CVE-2023-53629,
CVE-2024-27389, CVE-2024-35865, CVE-2024-36898, CVE-2024-36922,
CVE-2024-41079, CVE-2024-46715, CVE-2024-46770, CVE-2024-47809,
CVE-2024-50012, CVE-2024-53221, CVE-2024-56557, CVE-2024-56584,
CVE-2024-56657, CVE-2024-56719, CVE-2024-56727, CVE-2025-21712,
CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-23141, CVE-2025-38006, CVE-2025-38105,
CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38562, CVE-2025-38626, CVE-2025-38659,
CVE-2025-38710, CVE-2025-39748, CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-40005,
CVE-2025-40016, CVE-2025-40103, CVE-2025-40323, CVE-2025-68206,
CVE-2025-68239, CVE-2025-68256, CVE-2025-68307, CVE-2025-68358,
CVE-2025-71150, CVE-2025-71161, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71232,
CVE-2025-71233, CVE-2025-71235, CVE-2025-71236, CVE-2025-71237,
CVE-2025-71238, CVE-2025-71239, CVE-2025-71265, CVE-2025-71266,
CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2025-71274, CVE-2025-71287, CVE-2025-71292,
CVE-2026-23031, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23113,
CVE-2026-23141, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23204,
CVE-2026-23220, CVE-2026-23222, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23228,
CVE-2026-23229, CVE-2026-23235, CVE-2026-23236, CVE-2026-23237,
CVE-2026-23238, CVE-2026-23241, CVE-2026-23242, CVE-2026-23243,
CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23266, CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23289,
CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296,
CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23303, CVE-2026-23304,
CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23324,
CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23352,
CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23365,
CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23372,
CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23388,
CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396,
CVE-2026-23397, CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401,
CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439,
CVE-2026-23442, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454,
CVE-2026-23456, CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31400, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408,
CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31411, CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416,
CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421, CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423,
CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428,
CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31452,
CVE-2026-31454, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467, CVE-2026-31469,
CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31480, CVE-2026-31483,
CVE-2026-31494, CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498,
CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522,
CVE-2026-31523, CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550,
CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31577,
CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586,
CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602,
CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616,
CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622,
CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626,
CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31630,
CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31656,
CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662,
CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671,
CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31676,
CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31681, CVE-2026-31683,
CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31687, CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695,
CVE-2026-31696, CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699,
CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31716, CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721,
CVE-2026-31726, CVE-2026-31728, CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738,
CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31754,
CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758, CVE-2026-31759,
CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763, CVE-2026-31770, CVE-2026-31773,
CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31780, CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-43014,
CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030,
CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43041,
CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43046, CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43050,
CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43058,
CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061, CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43065,
CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43074,
CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079, CVE-2026-43080,
CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43089, CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43098,
CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104, CVE-2026-43105,
CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43123,
CVE-2026-43124, CVE-2026-43130, CVE-2026-43132, CVE-2026-43134,
CVE-2026-43135, CVE-2026-43136, CVE-2026-43139, CVE-2026-43140,
CVE-2026-43141, CVE-2026-43145, CVE-2026-43147, CVE-2026-43148,
CVE-2026-43149, CVE-2026-43152, CVE-2026-43156, CVE-2026-43158,
CVE-2026-43159, CVE-2026-43163, CVE-2026-43168, CVE-2026-43171,
CVE-2026-43182, CVE-2026-43183, CVE-2026-43184, CVE-2026-43187,
CVE-2026-43190, CVE-2026-43194, CVE-2026-43196, CVE-2026-43200,
CVE-2026-43202, CVE-2026-43203, CVE-2026-43206, CVE-2026-43209,
CVE-2026-43218, CVE-2026-43223, CVE-2026-43225, CVE-2026-43226,
CVE-2026-43227, CVE-2026-43230, CVE-2026-43231, CVE-2026-43233,
CVE-2026-43236, CVE-2026-43241, CVE-2026-43242, CVE-2026-43246,
CVE-2026-43251, CVE-2026-43255, CVE-2026-43257, CVE-2026-43261,
CVE-2026-43262, CVE-2026-43264, CVE-2026-43266, CVE-2026-43268,
CVE-2026-43269, CVE-2026-43270, CVE-2026-43273, CVE-2026-43275,
CVE-2026-43277, CVE-2026-43279, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43287,
CVE-2026-43289, CVE-2026-43295, CVE-2026-43296, CVE-2026-43302,
CVE-2026-43312, CVE-2026-43313, CVE-2026-43314, CVE-2026-43315,
CVE-2026-43316, CVE-2026-43327, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43333,
CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340,
CVE-2026-43342, CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43363,
CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43373, CVE-2026-43381,
CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43405,
CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43427,
CVE-2026-43428, CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432,
CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450,
CVE-2026-43451, CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43459,
CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473,
CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476, CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43502,
CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45839,
CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45846,
CVE-2026-45847, CVE-2026-45848, CVE-2026-45852, CVE-2026-45856,
CVE-2026-45857, CVE-2026-45860, CVE-2026-45864, CVE-2026-45873,
CVE-2026-45890, CVE-2026-45891, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45902,
CVE-2026-45904, CVE-2026-45912, CVE-2026-45915, CVE-2026-45916,
CVE-2026-45919, CVE-2026-45920, CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45935,
CVE-2026-45936, CVE-2026-45941, CVE-2026-45946, CVE-2026-45948,
CVE-2026-45954, CVE-2026-45956, CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45960,
CVE-2026-45964, CVE-2026-45965, CVE-2026-45968, CVE-2026-45969,
CVE-2026-45970, CVE-2026-45974, CVE-2026-45978, CVE-2026-45983,
CVE-2026-45984, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987,
CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46006,
CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46015, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019,
CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46027,
CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46044,
CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050,
CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46064,
CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46080,
CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099,
CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108,
CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123,
CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46132,
CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149,
CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163,
CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46174,
CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186,
CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46212,
CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46227,
CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234,
CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46259, CVE-2026-46273,
CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46275, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304,
CVE-2026-46319)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8575-2: Linux kernel vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688377/unix-server/usn-8575-2-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688377/unix-server/usn-8575-2-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:31:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose sensitive information (kernel memory). (CVE-2023-45896)

It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM32 architecture;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - ATM drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - RNBD block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clocksource drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - CPU idle management framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - Arm Firmware Framework for ARMv8-A(FFA);
  - EFI core;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Multifunction device drivers;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - RapidIO drivers;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - RPMSG subsystem;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Texas Instruments SoC drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FAT file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - JFS file system;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Proc file system;
  - Pstore file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) subsystem;
  - Memory Management;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Kernel kexec() syscall;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Networking core;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - AppArmor security module;
  - Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel framework;
  - ALSA framework;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - AudioScience HPI driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
(CVE-2022-49803, CVE-2022-49961, CVE-2022-50073, CVE-2022-50116,
CVE-2022-50552, CVE-2023-52682, CVE-2023-52737, CVE-2023-53545,
CVE-2023-53596, CVE-2023-53629, CVE-2024-27389, CVE-2024-35865,
CVE-2024-36898, CVE-2024-36922, CVE-2024-41079, CVE-2024-46715,
CVE-2024-46770, CVE-2024-47809, CVE-2024-50012, CVE-2024-53221,
CVE-2024-56557, CVE-2024-56584, CVE-2024-56657, CVE-2024-56719,
CVE-2024-56727, CVE-2025-21712, CVE-2025-21739, CVE-2025-21863,
CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-23141, CVE-2025-37786, CVE-2025-38006,
CVE-2025-38105, CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38250, CVE-2025-38562,
CVE-2025-38626, CVE-2025-38659, CVE-2025-38710, CVE-2025-39748,
CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-40005, CVE-2025-40016, CVE-2025-40103,
CVE-2025-40323, CVE-2025-68206, CVE-2025-68239, CVE-2025-68256,
CVE-2025-68307, CVE-2025-68358, CVE-2025-71150, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71232, CVE-2025-71233, CVE-2025-71235,
CVE-2025-71236, CVE-2025-71237, CVE-2025-71238, CVE-2025-71239,
CVE-2025-71265, CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2025-71274,
CVE-2025-71287, CVE-2025-71292, CVE-2025-71304, CVE-2026-23031,
CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23141,
CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23204, CVE-2026-23220,
CVE-2026-23221, CVE-2026-23222, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23228,
CVE-2026-23229, CVE-2026-23234, CVE-2026-23235, CVE-2026-23236,
CVE-2026-23237, CVE-2026-23238, CVE-2026-23241, CVE-2026-23242,
CVE-2026-23243, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23266, CVE-2026-23270,
CVE-2026-23277, CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23286,
CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23293,
CVE-2026-23296, CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23303,
CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23318,
CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339,
CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357,
CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23367,
CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23379,
CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23391,
CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397,
CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23420,
CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454,
CVE-2026-23456, CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400, CVE-2026-31405,
CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408, CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31411,
CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31446,
CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31454,
CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467,
CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498, CVE-2026-31507,
CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522,
CVE-2026-31523, CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550,
CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31565,
CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578,
CVE-2026-31580, CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31585,
CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594,
CVE-2026-31596, CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599,
CVE-2026-31602, CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31615,
CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619,
CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625,
CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629,
CVE-2026-31630, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31651,
CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661,
CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667,
CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673,
CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31676, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680,
CVE-2026-31681, CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686,
CVE-2026-31687, CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696,
CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31701,
CVE-2026-31716, CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31726,
CVE-2026-31728, CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31747,
CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752,
CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758,
CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763,
CVE-2026-31770, CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31780,
CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015,
CVE-2026-43020, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027,
CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035,
CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43046,
CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052,
CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061,
CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068,
CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076,
CVE-2026-43079, CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43089,
CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103,
CVE-2026-43104, CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111,
CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43123, CVE-2026-43124,
CVE-2026-43130, CVE-2026-43132, CVE-2026-43133, CVE-2026-43134,
CVE-2026-43135, CVE-2026-43136, CVE-2026-43139, CVE-2026-43140,
CVE-2026-43141, CVE-2026-43145, CVE-2026-43147, CVE-2026-43148,
CVE-2026-43149, CVE-2026-43152, CVE-2026-43156, CVE-2026-43158,
CVE-2026-43159, CVE-2026-43163, CVE-2026-43168, CVE-2026-43171,
CVE-2026-43180, CVE-2026-43182, CVE-2026-43183, CVE-2026-43184,
CVE-2026-43187, CVE-2026-43190, CVE-2026-43194, CVE-2026-43196,
CVE-2026-43200, CVE-2026-43202, CVE-2026-43203, CVE-2026-43205,
CVE-2026-43206, CVE-2026-43207, CVE-2026-43209, CVE-2026-43211,
CVE-2026-43218, CVE-2026-43223, CVE-2026-43225, CVE-2026-43226,
CVE-2026-43227, CVE-2026-43230, CVE-2026-43231, CVE-2026-43232,
CVE-2026-43233, CVE-2026-43236, CVE-2026-43241, CVE-2026-43242,
CVE-2026-43246, CVE-2026-43251, CVE-2026-43255, CVE-2026-43257,
CVE-2026-43261, CVE-2026-43262, CVE-2026-43264, CVE-2026-43266,
CVE-2026-43268, CVE-2026-43269, CVE-2026-43270, CVE-2026-43273,
CVE-2026-43275, CVE-2026-43277, CVE-2026-43279, CVE-2026-43281,
CVE-2026-43283, CVE-2026-43287, CVE-2026-43289, CVE-2026-43291,
CVE-2026-43295, CVE-2026-43296, CVE-2026-43302, CVE-2026-43312,
CVE-2026-43313, CVE-2026-43314, CVE-2026-43315, CVE-2026-43316,
CVE-2026-43324, CVE-2026-43327, CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329,
CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43339,
CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342, CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43357,
CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43373,
CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381, CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43386,
CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43420,
CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428,
CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43439,
CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451,
CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459,
CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473,
CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476, CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43484,
CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839,
CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843,
CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45847, CVE-2026-45848,
CVE-2026-45852, CVE-2026-45856, CVE-2026-45857, CVE-2026-45860,
CVE-2026-45862, CVE-2026-45864, CVE-2026-45866, CVE-2026-45867,
CVE-2026-45868, CVE-2026-45869, CVE-2026-45870, CVE-2026-45871,
CVE-2026-45873, CVE-2026-45875, CVE-2026-45879, CVE-2026-45883,
CVE-2026-45885, CVE-2026-45890, CVE-2026-45891, CVE-2026-45899,
CVE-2026-45902, CVE-2026-45904, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45912,
CVE-2026-45915, CVE-2026-45916, CVE-2026-45919, CVE-2026-45920,
CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45935, CVE-2026-45936, CVE-2026-45941,
CVE-2026-45946, CVE-2026-45948, CVE-2026-45954, CVE-2026-45956,
CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45960, CVE-2026-45964, CVE-2026-45965,
CVE-2026-45968, CVE-2026-45969, CVE-2026-45970, CVE-2026-45974,
CVE-2026-45978, CVE-2026-45983, CVE-2026-45984, CVE-2026-45985,
CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-46002,
CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46015,
CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023,
CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037,
CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46044, CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047,
CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050, CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46053,
CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072,
CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46088,
CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102,
CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46120,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46127,
CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46137,
CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151,
CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178,
CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189,
CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206,
CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46219,
CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231,
CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238,
CVE-2026-46249, CVE-2026-46250, CVE-2026-46253, CVE-2026-46259,
CVE-2026-46267, CVE-2026-46270, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274,
CVE-2026-46275, CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46301,
CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46319,
CVE-2026-46328, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52914,
CVE-2026-52915, CVE-2026-52916, CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920,
CVE-2026-52921, CVE-2026-52922, CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52926,
CVE-2026-52931, CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957,
CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52969,
CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985,
CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002,
CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011,
CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022,
CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040,
CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046,
CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050,
CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062,
CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069,
CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074,
CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53077, CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53088,
CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53128,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53294,
CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53379,
CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63865, CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64032,
CVE-2026-64033, CVE-2026-64034, CVE-2026-64039, CVE-2026-64046,
CVE-2026-64047, CVE-2026-64055, CVE-2026-64056, CVE-2026-64083,
CVE-2026-64084, CVE-2026-64085, CVE-2026-64086, CVE-2026-64087,
CVE-2026-64088, CVE-2026-64089, CVE-2026-64096, CVE-2026-64102,
CVE-2026-64103, CVE-2026-64113, CVE-2026-64114, CVE-2026-64115,
CVE-2026-64125, CVE-2026-64133, CVE-2026-64135, CVE-2026-64153,
CVE-2026-64155, CVE-2026-64164, CVE-2026-64165, CVE-2026-64166,
CVE-2026-64168, CVE-2026-64173, CVE-2026-64174, CVE-2026-64177,
CVE-2026-64178, CVE-2026-64179, CVE-2026-64185)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8576-2: Linux kernel (NVIDIA Tegra) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688376/unix-server/usn-8576-2-linux-kernel-nvidia-tegra-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688376/unix-server/usn-8576-2-linux-kernel-nvidia-tegra-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:31:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose sensitive information (kernel memory). (CVE-2023-45896)

It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM32 architecture;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - ATM drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - RNBD block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clocksource drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - CPU idle management framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - Arm Firmware Framework for ARMv8-A(FFA);
  - EFI core;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Multifunction device drivers;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - RapidIO drivers;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - RPMSG subsystem;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Texas Instruments SoC drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FAT file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - JFS file system;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Proc file system;
  - Pstore file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) subsystem;
  - Memory Management;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Kernel kexec() syscall;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Networking core;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - AppArmor security module;
  - Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel framework;
  - ALSA framework;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - AudioScience HPI driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
(CVE-2022-49803, CVE-2022-49961, CVE-2022-50073, CVE-2022-50116,
CVE-2022-50552, CVE-2023-52682, CVE-2023-52737, CVE-2023-53545,
CVE-2023-53596, CVE-2023-53629, CVE-2024-27389, CVE-2024-35865,
CVE-2024-36898, CVE-2024-36922, CVE-2024-41079, CVE-2024-46715,
CVE-2024-46770, CVE-2024-47809, CVE-2024-50012, CVE-2024-53221,
CVE-2024-56557, CVE-2024-56584, CVE-2024-56657, CVE-2024-56719,
CVE-2024-56727, CVE-2025-21712, CVE-2025-21739, CVE-2025-21863,
CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-23141, CVE-2025-37786, CVE-2025-38006,
CVE-2025-38105, CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38250, CVE-2025-38562,
CVE-2025-38626, CVE-2025-38659, CVE-2025-38710, CVE-2025-39748,
CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-40005, CVE-2025-40016, CVE-2025-40103,
CVE-2025-40323, CVE-2025-68206, CVE-2025-68239, CVE-2025-68256,
CVE-2025-68307, CVE-2025-68358, CVE-2025-71150, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71232, CVE-2025-71235, CVE-2025-71236,
CVE-2025-71237, CVE-2025-71238, CVE-2025-71239, CVE-2025-71265,
CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2025-71274, CVE-2025-71287,
CVE-2025-71292, CVE-2025-71304, CVE-2026-23031, CVE-2026-23066,
CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23141, CVE-2026-23157,
CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23204, CVE-2026-23220, CVE-2026-23221,
CVE-2026-23222, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23228, CVE-2026-23229,
CVE-2026-23234, CVE-2026-23235, CVE-2026-23236, CVE-2026-23237,
CVE-2026-23238, CVE-2026-23241, CVE-2026-23242, CVE-2026-23243,
CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23266, CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23289,
CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296,
CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23303, CVE-2026-23304,
CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23324,
CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340,
CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359,
CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368,
CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381,
CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23392,
CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397, CVE-2026-23398,
CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23434,
CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23442, CVE-2026-23444,
CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23456,
CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23462,
CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-31393, CVE-2026-31396,
CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407,
CVE-2026-31408, CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31411, CVE-2026-31415,
CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421, CVE-2026-31422,
CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425, CVE-2026-31427,
CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447,
CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31454, CVE-2026-31455,
CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467, CVE-2026-31469,
CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31480, CVE-2026-31483,
CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31494, CVE-2026-31495,
CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508,
CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31512, CVE-2026-31515,
CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523,
CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31545,
CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550, CVE-2026-31551,
CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31570,
CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586,
CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602,
CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616,
CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622,
CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626,
CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31630,
CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31656,
CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662,
CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31670,
CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674,
CVE-2026-31676, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31681,
CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686, CVE-2026-31687,
CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696, CVE-2026-31697,
CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31716,
CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31726, CVE-2026-31728,
CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31747, CVE-2026-31748,
CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31754,
CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758, CVE-2026-31759,
CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763, CVE-2026-31770,
CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31780, CVE-2026-31781,
CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015, CVE-2026-43020,
CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028,
CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43040,
CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43046, CVE-2026-43047,
CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054,
CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061, CVE-2026-43062,
CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069,
CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079,
CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43089, CVE-2026-43093,
CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104,
CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43112,
CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43123, CVE-2026-43124, CVE-2026-43130,
CVE-2026-43132, CVE-2026-43133, CVE-2026-43134, CVE-2026-43135,
CVE-2026-43136, CVE-2026-43139, CVE-2026-43140, CVE-2026-43141,
CVE-2026-43145, CVE-2026-43147, CVE-2026-43148, CVE-2026-43149,
CVE-2026-43152, CVE-2026-43156, CVE-2026-43158, CVE-2026-43159,
CVE-2026-43163, CVE-2026-43168, CVE-2026-43171, CVE-2026-43180,
CVE-2026-43182, CVE-2026-43183, CVE-2026-43184, CVE-2026-43187,
CVE-2026-43190, CVE-2026-43194, CVE-2026-43196, CVE-2026-43202,
CVE-2026-43203, CVE-2026-43205, CVE-2026-43206, CVE-2026-43207,
CVE-2026-43209, CVE-2026-43211, CVE-2026-43218, CVE-2026-43223,
CVE-2026-43225, CVE-2026-43226, CVE-2026-43227, CVE-2026-43230,
CVE-2026-43231, CVE-2026-43232, CVE-2026-43233, CVE-2026-43236,
CVE-2026-43241, CVE-2026-43242, CVE-2026-43246, CVE-2026-43251,
CVE-2026-43255, CVE-2026-43257, CVE-2026-43261, CVE-2026-43262,
CVE-2026-43264, CVE-2026-43266, CVE-2026-43268, CVE-2026-43269,
CVE-2026-43270, CVE-2026-43273, CVE-2026-43275, CVE-2026-43277,
CVE-2026-43279, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43283, CVE-2026-43287,
CVE-2026-43289, CVE-2026-43291, CVE-2026-43295, CVE-2026-43296,
CVE-2026-43302, CVE-2026-43312, CVE-2026-43313, CVE-2026-43314,
CVE-2026-43315, CVE-2026-43316, CVE-2026-43324, CVE-2026-43327,
CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334,
CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342,
CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365,
CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43373, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381,
CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43405,
CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426,
CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428, CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430,
CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43449,
CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451, CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453,
CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43469,
CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476,
CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497,
CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836,
CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841,
CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45846,
CVE-2026-45847, CVE-2026-45848, CVE-2026-45852, CVE-2026-45856,
CVE-2026-45857, CVE-2026-45860, CVE-2026-45862, CVE-2026-45864,
CVE-2026-45866, CVE-2026-45867, CVE-2026-45868, CVE-2026-45869,
CVE-2026-45870, CVE-2026-45871, CVE-2026-45873, CVE-2026-45875,
CVE-2026-45879, CVE-2026-45883, CVE-2026-45885, CVE-2026-45890,
CVE-2026-45891, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45902, CVE-2026-45904,
CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45912, CVE-2026-45915, CVE-2026-45916,
CVE-2026-45919, CVE-2026-45920, CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45935,
CVE-2026-45936, CVE-2026-45941, CVE-2026-45946, CVE-2026-45948,
CVE-2026-45954, CVE-2026-45956, CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45960,
CVE-2026-45964, CVE-2026-45965, CVE-2026-45968, CVE-2026-45969,
CVE-2026-45970, CVE-2026-45974, CVE-2026-45978, CVE-2026-45983,
CVE-2026-45984, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987,
CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46006,
CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46015, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019,
CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46027,
CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46044,
CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050,
CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46064,
CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46080,
CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099,
CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108,
CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123,
CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46132,
CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149,
CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163,
CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46174,
CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186,
CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46212,
CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46227,
CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234,
CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46249, CVE-2026-46250,
CVE-2026-46253, CVE-2026-46259, CVE-2026-46267, CVE-2026-46270,
CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46275, CVE-2026-46285,
CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304,
CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-46328, CVE-2026-52911,
CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52914, CVE-2026-52915, CVE-2026-52916,
CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52921, CVE-2026-52922,
CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52926, CVE-2026-52931, CVE-2026-52954,
CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52962,
CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52982,
CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52992,
CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999,
CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004,
CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53016,
CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53037,
CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043,
CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048,
CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060,
CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065,
CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072,
CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53096,
CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53287,
CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296,
CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306, CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53320,
CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53379, CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63865,
CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64032, CVE-2026-64033, CVE-2026-64034,
CVE-2026-64039, CVE-2026-64046, CVE-2026-64047, CVE-2026-64055,
CVE-2026-64056, CVE-2026-64083, CVE-2026-64084, CVE-2026-64085,
CVE-2026-64086, CVE-2026-64087, CVE-2026-64088, CVE-2026-64089,
CVE-2026-64096, CVE-2026-64102, CVE-2026-64103, CVE-2026-64113,
CVE-2026-64114, CVE-2026-64115, CVE-2026-64125, CVE-2026-64133,
CVE-2026-64135, CVE-2026-64153, CVE-2026-64155, CVE-2026-64164,
CVE-2026-64165, CVE-2026-64166, CVE-2026-64168, CVE-2026-64173,
CVE-2026-64174, CVE-2026-64177, CVE-2026-64178, CVE-2026-64179,
CVE-2026-64185)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8595-1: Linux kernel (Oracle) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688352/unix-server/usn-8595-1-linux-kernel-oracle-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688352/unix-server/usn-8595-1-linux-kernel-oracle-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:20:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - CXL (Compute Express Link) drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Fastrpc Driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Ethernet team driver;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Microchip PolarFire SoC system controller driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM TDX Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Memory Management;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Networking core;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - Landlock security;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - Samsung ASoC drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2025-21709, CVE-2025-22116, CVE-2025-38426, CVE-2025-39764,
CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40150, CVE-2025-68175, CVE-2025-68239,
CVE-2025-68334, CVE-2025-68736, CVE-2025-71152, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71203, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71269, CVE-2025-71287,
CVE-2025-71288, CVE-2026-22981, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22993,
CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23104, CVE-2026-23118,
CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23171,
CVE-2026-23207, CVE-2026-23226, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23244,
CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23246, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23255,
CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23276, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23285,
CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290,
CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23292, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296,
CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23302, CVE-2026-23303,
CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23306, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23308,
CVE-2026-23310, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23313, CVE-2026-23315,
CVE-2026-23317, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321,
CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23325, CVE-2026-23330, CVE-2026-23334,
CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340,
CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23347, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356,
CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23360, CVE-2026-23361,
CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23363, CVE-2026-23364, CVE-2026-23365,
CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23369, CVE-2026-23370,
CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23374, CVE-2026-23375, CVE-2026-23378,
CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23383,
CVE-2026-23386, CVE-2026-23387, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23389,
CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397,
CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23412,
CVE-2026-23413, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23418, CVE-2026-23419,
CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23426, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438,
CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23440, CVE-2026-23441, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23447, CVE-2026-23448,
CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23456,
CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23461,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23464, CVE-2026-23465,
CVE-2026-23468, CVE-2026-23470, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475,
CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31392, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31394, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400,
CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408,
CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31412, CVE-2026-31413, CVE-2026-31414,
CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31426, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31429,
CVE-2026-31430, CVE-2026-31432, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31434,
CVE-2026-31438, CVE-2026-31439, CVE-2026-31440, CVE-2026-31441,
CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31449, CVE-2026-31450,
CVE-2026-31451, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31453, CVE-2026-31454,
CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31458, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466,
CVE-2026-31467, CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31470, CVE-2026-31473,
CVE-2026-31474, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31477, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31482, CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31487,
CVE-2026-31488, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31492, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498,
CVE-2026-31499, CVE-2026-31500, CVE-2026-31502, CVE-2026-31503,
CVE-2026-31505, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31509,
CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31511, CVE-2026-31512, CVE-2026-31515,
CVE-2026-31516, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31519, CVE-2026-31520,
CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523, CVE-2026-31524,
CVE-2026-31525, CVE-2026-31527, CVE-2026-31528, CVE-2026-31530,
CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31542, CVE-2026-31545,
CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31548, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550,
CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31554, CVE-2026-31555,
CVE-2026-31556, CVE-2026-31557, CVE-2026-31563, CVE-2026-31565,
CVE-2026-31566, CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31575, CVE-2026-31576,
CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580, CVE-2026-31581,
CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584, CVE-2026-31585,
CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590,
CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596, CVE-2026-31597,
CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602, CVE-2026-31603,
CVE-2026-31604, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606, CVE-2026-31610,
CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612, CVE-2026-31613, CVE-2026-31615,
CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619,
CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625,
CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629,
CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31638, CVE-2026-31639, CVE-2026-31642,
CVE-2026-31645, CVE-2026-31646, CVE-2026-31648, CVE-2026-31651,
CVE-2026-31655, CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31660,
CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665,
CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672,
CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31675, CVE-2026-31677,
CVE-2026-31678, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31681,
CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686, CVE-2026-31689,
CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696, CVE-2026-31697,
CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700, CVE-2026-31701,
CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31704, CVE-2026-31705, CVE-2026-31706,
CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708, CVE-2026-31709, CVE-2026-31711,
CVE-2026-31712, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715, CVE-2026-31716,
CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31722, CVE-2026-31723,
CVE-2026-31724, CVE-2026-31725, CVE-2026-31726, CVE-2026-31728,
CVE-2026-31729, CVE-2026-31730, CVE-2026-31731, CVE-2026-31737,
CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31740, CVE-2026-31741, CVE-2026-31747,
CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752,
CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758,
CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763,
CVE-2026-31767, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-31770, CVE-2026-31772,
CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31779, CVE-2026-31780,
CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43007, CVE-2026-43012,
CVE-2026-43013, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015, CVE-2026-43016,
CVE-2026-43017, CVE-2026-43018, CVE-2026-43019, CVE-2026-43020,
CVE-2026-43023, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025, CVE-2026-43026,
CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43032,
CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43036, CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43041,
CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43044, CVE-2026-43046, CVE-2026-43047,
CVE-2026-43049, CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052,
CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43056, CVE-2026-43057, CVE-2026-43058,
CVE-2026-43059, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061, CVE-2026-43062,
CVE-2026-43064, CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068,
CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073, CVE-2026-43074,
CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079, CVE-2026-43080,
CVE-2026-43081, CVE-2026-43082, CVE-2026-43084, CVE-2026-43085,
CVE-2026-43086, CVE-2026-43088, CVE-2026-43089, CVE-2026-43091,
CVE-2026-43092, CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43094, CVE-2026-43098,
CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104, CVE-2026-43105,
CVE-2026-43107, CVE-2026-43109, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111,
CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43119, CVE-2026-43120,
CVE-2026-43129, CVE-2026-43162, CVE-2026-43245, CVE-2026-43252,
CVE-2026-43265, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43324, CVE-2026-43327,
CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43330, CVE-2026-43332,
CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43338,
CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342, CVE-2026-43343,
CVE-2026-43345, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43355, CVE-2026-43357,
CVE-2026-43359, CVE-2026-43360, CVE-2026-43361, CVE-2026-43362,
CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43366, CVE-2026-43368,
CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43371, CVE-2026-43372, CVE-2026-43373,
CVE-2026-43377, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381, CVE-2026-43382,
CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43395, CVE-2026-43397,
CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43408, CVE-2026-43409, CVE-2026-43411,
CVE-2026-43412, CVE-2026-43413, CVE-2026-43415, CVE-2026-43419,
CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43421, CVE-2026-43424, CVE-2026-43425,
CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428, CVE-2026-43429,
CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43436, CVE-2026-43437,
CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43441, CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43448,
CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451, CVE-2026-43452,
CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43455, CVE-2026-43456, CVE-2026-43457,
CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43467,
CVE-2026-43468, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43471, CVE-2026-43472,
CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476, CVE-2026-43480,
CVE-2026-43483, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43488, CVE-2026-43490,
CVE-2026-43491, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496,
CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43499, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839,
CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843,
CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45855,
CVE-2026-45858, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45920,
CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45942, CVE-2026-45943, CVE-2026-45956,
CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987,
CVE-2026-45989, CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-45996,
CVE-2026-45997, CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46003,
CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46007,
CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012, CVE-2026-46015,
CVE-2026-46016, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46021,
CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46026,
CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037,
CVE-2026-46038, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041, CVE-2026-46044,
CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050,
CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46056,
CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46063,
CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46068, CVE-2026-46069,
CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073, CVE-2026-46075,
CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078, CVE-2026-46079,
CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083, CVE-2026-46084,
CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089, CVE-2026-46090,
CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46094, CVE-2026-46098,
CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46103,
CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46110,
CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113, CVE-2026-46114,
CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125,
CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129,
CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46136,
CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139, CVE-2026-46142,
CVE-2026-46143, CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146,
CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46152,
CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160, CVE-2026-46161,
CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174,
CVE-2026-46176, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179,
CVE-2026-46180, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187,
CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46193,
CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201, CVE-2026-46204,
CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46207, CVE-2026-46208,
CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46214,
CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46225,
CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46229, CVE-2026-46230,
CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234,
CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46241,
CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46280, CVE-2026-46282,
CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286, CVE-2026-46287, CVE-2026-46291,
CVE-2026-46292, CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46296,
CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304,
CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46314,
CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52925,
CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52951, CVE-2026-52954,
CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52961,
CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964, CVE-2026-52967,
CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52974,
CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52981, CVE-2026-52982,
CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52989,
CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002,
CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011,
CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014, CVE-2026-53015,
CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023,
CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034, CVE-2026-53035,
CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040,
CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046,
CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050,
CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53058, CVE-2026-53059,
CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53063,
CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066, CVE-2026-53068,
CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073,
CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084, CVE-2026-53085,
CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53094,
CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098, CVE-2026-53110,
CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53117,
CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53126, CVE-2026-53128,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53289,
CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295,
CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53369,
CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375, CVE-2026-53376, CVE-2026-53379,
CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63843, CVE-2026-63844, CVE-2026-63845,
CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847, CVE-2026-63848, CVE-2026-63851,
CVE-2026-63852, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855, CVE-2026-63856,
CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862, CVE-2026-63865,
CVE-2026-64164)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8596-1: Linux kernel (NVIDIA) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688351/unix-server/usn-8596-1-linux-kernel-nvidia-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688351/unix-server/usn-8596-1-linux-kernel-nvidia-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:20:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - CXL (Compute Express Link) drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Fastrpc Driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Ethernet team driver;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Microchip PolarFire SoC system controller driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM TDX Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Memory Management;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Networking core;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - Landlock security;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - Samsung ASoC drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2025-21709, CVE-2025-22116, CVE-2025-38426, CVE-2025-39764,
CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40150, CVE-2025-68175, CVE-2025-68239,
CVE-2025-68334, CVE-2025-68736, CVE-2025-71152, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71203, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71269, CVE-2025-71287,
CVE-2025-71288, CVE-2026-22981, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22993,
CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23104, CVE-2026-23118,
CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23171,
CVE-2026-23226, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23244, CVE-2026-23245,
CVE-2026-23246, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23255, CVE-2026-23270,
CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23276, CVE-2026-23277, CVE-2026-23279,
CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23285, CVE-2026-23286,
CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291,
CVE-2026-23292, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296, CVE-2026-23298,
CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23302, CVE-2026-23303, CVE-2026-23304,
CVE-2026-23306, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23308, CVE-2026-23310,
CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23313, CVE-2026-23315, CVE-2026-23317,
CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321, CVE-2026-23324,
CVE-2026-23325, CVE-2026-23330, CVE-2026-23334, CVE-2026-23335,
CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23343,
CVE-2026-23347, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357,
CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23360, CVE-2026-23361, CVE-2026-23362,
CVE-2026-23363, CVE-2026-23364, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23367,
CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23369, CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23372,
CVE-2026-23374, CVE-2026-23375, CVE-2026-23378, CVE-2026-23379,
CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23383, CVE-2026-23386,
CVE-2026-23387, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23389, CVE-2026-23391,
CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397, CVE-2026-23398,
CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23412, CVE-2026-23413,
CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23418, CVE-2026-23419, CVE-2026-23420,
CVE-2026-23426, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439,
CVE-2026-23440, CVE-2026-23441, CVE-2026-23442, CVE-2026-23444,
CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23447, CVE-2026-23448, CVE-2026-23449,
CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23456, CVE-2026-23457,
CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23461, CVE-2026-23462,
CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23464, CVE-2026-23465, CVE-2026-23468,
CVE-2026-23470, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475, CVE-2026-31389,
CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31392, CVE-2026-31393, CVE-2026-31394,
CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400, CVE-2026-31403,
CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408, CVE-2026-31409,
CVE-2026-31412, CVE-2026-31413, CVE-2026-31414, CVE-2026-31415,
CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421, CVE-2026-31422,
CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425, CVE-2026-31426,
CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31429, CVE-2026-31430,
CVE-2026-31432, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31434, CVE-2026-31438,
CVE-2026-31439, CVE-2026-31440, CVE-2026-31441, CVE-2026-31446,
CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31449, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31451,
CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31453, CVE-2026-31454, CVE-2026-31455,
CVE-2026-31458, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467,
CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31470, CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31474,
CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31477, CVE-2026-31480, CVE-2026-31482,
CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31487, CVE-2026-31488,
CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31492, CVE-2026-31494, CVE-2026-31495,
CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498, CVE-2026-31499,
CVE-2026-31500, CVE-2026-31502, CVE-2026-31503, CVE-2026-31505,
CVE-2026-31506, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31509,
CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31511, CVE-2026-31512, CVE-2026-31515,
CVE-2026-31516, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31519, CVE-2026-31520,
CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523, CVE-2026-31524,
CVE-2026-31525, CVE-2026-31527, CVE-2026-31528, CVE-2026-31530,
CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31542, CVE-2026-31545,
CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31548, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550,
CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31554, CVE-2026-31555,
CVE-2026-31556, CVE-2026-31557, CVE-2026-31563, CVE-2026-31565,
CVE-2026-31566, CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31575, CVE-2026-31576,
CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580, CVE-2026-31581,
CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584, CVE-2026-31585,
CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590,
CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596, CVE-2026-31597,
CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602, CVE-2026-31603,
CVE-2026-31604, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606, CVE-2026-31610,
CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612, CVE-2026-31613, CVE-2026-31615,
CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619,
CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625,
CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629,
CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31638, CVE-2026-31639, CVE-2026-31642,
CVE-2026-31645, CVE-2026-31646, CVE-2026-31648, CVE-2026-31651,
CVE-2026-31655, CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31660,
CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665,
CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672,
CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31675, CVE-2026-31677,
CVE-2026-31678, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31681,
CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686, CVE-2026-31689,
CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696, CVE-2026-31697,
CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700, CVE-2026-31701,
CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31704, CVE-2026-31705, CVE-2026-31706,
CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708, CVE-2026-31709, CVE-2026-31711,
CVE-2026-31712, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715, CVE-2026-31716,
CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31722, CVE-2026-31723,
CVE-2026-31724, CVE-2026-31725, CVE-2026-31726, CVE-2026-31728,
CVE-2026-31729, CVE-2026-31730, CVE-2026-31731, CVE-2026-31737,
CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31740, CVE-2026-31741, CVE-2026-31747,
CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752,
CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758,
CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763,
CVE-2026-31767, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-31770, CVE-2026-31772,
CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31779, CVE-2026-31780,
CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43007, CVE-2026-43012,
CVE-2026-43013, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015, CVE-2026-43016,
CVE-2026-43017, CVE-2026-43018, CVE-2026-43019, CVE-2026-43020,
CVE-2026-43023, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025, CVE-2026-43026,
CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43032,
CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43036, CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43041,
CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43044, CVE-2026-43046, CVE-2026-43047,
CVE-2026-43049, CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052,
CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43056, CVE-2026-43057, CVE-2026-43058,
CVE-2026-43059, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061, CVE-2026-43062,
CVE-2026-43064, CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068,
CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073, CVE-2026-43074,
CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079, CVE-2026-43080,
CVE-2026-43081, CVE-2026-43082, CVE-2026-43084, CVE-2026-43085,
CVE-2026-43086, CVE-2026-43088, CVE-2026-43089, CVE-2026-43091,
CVE-2026-43092, CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43094, CVE-2026-43098,
CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104, CVE-2026-43105,
CVE-2026-43107, CVE-2026-43109, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111,
CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43119, CVE-2026-43120,
CVE-2026-43129, CVE-2026-43162, CVE-2026-43245, CVE-2026-43252,
CVE-2026-43265, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43324, CVE-2026-43327,
CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43330, CVE-2026-43332,
CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43338,
CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342, CVE-2026-43343,
CVE-2026-43345, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43355, CVE-2026-43357,
CVE-2026-43359, CVE-2026-43360, CVE-2026-43361, CVE-2026-43362,
CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43366, CVE-2026-43368,
CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43371, CVE-2026-43372, CVE-2026-43373,
CVE-2026-43377, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381, CVE-2026-43382,
CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43395, CVE-2026-43397,
CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43408, CVE-2026-43409, CVE-2026-43411,
CVE-2026-43412, CVE-2026-43413, CVE-2026-43415, CVE-2026-43419,
CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43421, CVE-2026-43424, CVE-2026-43425,
CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428, CVE-2026-43429,
CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43436, CVE-2026-43437,
CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43441, CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43448,
CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451, CVE-2026-43452,
CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43455, CVE-2026-43456, CVE-2026-43457,
CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43467,
CVE-2026-43468, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43471, CVE-2026-43472,
CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476, CVE-2026-43480,
CVE-2026-43483, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43488, CVE-2026-43490,
CVE-2026-43491, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496,
CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43499, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839,
CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843,
CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45855,
CVE-2026-45858, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45920,
CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45942, CVE-2026-45943, CVE-2026-45956,
CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987,
CVE-2026-45989, CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-45996,
CVE-2026-45997, CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46003,
CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46007,
CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012, CVE-2026-46015,
CVE-2026-46016, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46021,
CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46026,
CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037,
CVE-2026-46038, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041, CVE-2026-46044,
CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050,
CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46056,
CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46063,
CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46068, CVE-2026-46069,
CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073, CVE-2026-46075,
CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078, CVE-2026-46079,
CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083, CVE-2026-46084,
CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089, CVE-2026-46090,
CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46094, CVE-2026-46098,
CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46103,
CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46110,
CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113, CVE-2026-46114,
CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125,
CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129,
CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46136,
CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139, CVE-2026-46142,
CVE-2026-46143, CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146,
CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46152,
CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160, CVE-2026-46161,
CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174,
CVE-2026-46176, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179,
CVE-2026-46180, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187,
CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46193,
CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201, CVE-2026-46204,
CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46207, CVE-2026-46208,
CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46214,
CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46225,
CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46229, CVE-2026-46230,
CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234,
CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46241,
CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46280, CVE-2026-46282,
CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286, CVE-2026-46287, CVE-2026-46291,
CVE-2026-46292, CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46296,
CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304,
CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46314,
CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52925,
CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52951, CVE-2026-52954,
CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52961,
CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964, CVE-2026-52967,
CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52974,
CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52981, CVE-2026-52982,
CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52989,
CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002,
CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011,
CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014, CVE-2026-53015,
CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023,
CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034, CVE-2026-53035,
CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040,
CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046,
CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050,
CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53058, CVE-2026-53059,
CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53063,
CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066, CVE-2026-53068,
CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073,
CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084, CVE-2026-53085,
CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53094,
CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098, CVE-2026-53110,
CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53117,
CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53126, CVE-2026-53128,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53289,
CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295,
CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53354,
CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375, CVE-2026-53376,
CVE-2026-53379, CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63843, CVE-2026-63844,
CVE-2026-63845, CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847, CVE-2026-63848,
CVE-2026-63851, CVE-2026-63852, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855,
CVE-2026-63856, CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862,
CVE-2026-63865, CVE-2026-64164)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8594-1: Linux kernel (OEM) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - Foo-over-UDP (FOU);
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Drivers core;
  ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688325/unix-server/usn-8594-1-linux-kernel-oem-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688325/unix-server/usn-8594-1-linux-kernel-oem-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:01:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - Foo-over-UDP (FOU);
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Drivers core;
  - Null block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - DPLL subsystem;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - On-Chip Interconnect management framework;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - Modular ISDN driver;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - UACCE accelerator framework;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Network drivers;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PHY drivers;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - W1 Dallas's 1-wire bus driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - EFI Variable file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) client;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - SMB network file system;
  - Memory Management;
  - Memory management;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Netfilter;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - Perf events;
  - Hibernation control;
  - Timer subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Floating proportions library;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Networking core;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NET/ROM layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - Network traffic control;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - ALSA AC97 driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - Texas InstrumentS Audio (ASoC/HDA) drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
(CVE-2025-71158, CVE-2025-71160, CVE-2025-71161, CVE-2025-71162,
CVE-2025-71163, CVE-2025-71180, CVE-2025-71182, CVE-2025-71183,
CVE-2025-71184, CVE-2025-71185, CVE-2025-71186, CVE-2025-71187,
CVE-2025-71188, CVE-2025-71189, CVE-2025-71190, CVE-2025-71191,
CVE-2025-71192, CVE-2025-71193, CVE-2025-71194, CVE-2025-71195,
CVE-2025-71196, CVE-2025-71197, CVE-2025-71198, CVE-2025-71199,
CVE-2025-71200, CVE-2025-71201, CVE-2026-22976, CVE-2026-22977,
CVE-2026-22978, CVE-2026-22979, CVE-2026-22980, CVE-2026-22981,
CVE-2026-22982, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22986, CVE-2026-22987,
CVE-2026-22989, CVE-2026-22990, CVE-2026-22991, CVE-2026-22992,
CVE-2026-22993, CVE-2026-22994, CVE-2026-22996, CVE-2026-22997,
CVE-2026-22998, CVE-2026-22999, CVE-2026-23000, CVE-2026-23001,
CVE-2026-23002, CVE-2026-23003, CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23005,
CVE-2026-23006, CVE-2026-23007, CVE-2026-23008, CVE-2026-23009,
CVE-2026-23010, CVE-2026-23011, CVE-2026-23012, CVE-2026-23013,
CVE-2026-23014, CVE-2026-23015, CVE-2026-23017, CVE-2026-23018,
CVE-2026-23019, CVE-2026-23020, CVE-2026-23021, CVE-2026-23022,
CVE-2026-23023, CVE-2026-23024, CVE-2026-23025, CVE-2026-23026,
CVE-2026-23030, CVE-2026-23031, CVE-2026-23032, CVE-2026-23033,
CVE-2026-23034, CVE-2026-23035, CVE-2026-23036, CVE-2026-23037,
CVE-2026-23038, CVE-2026-23042, CVE-2026-23044, CVE-2026-23045,
CVE-2026-23046, CVE-2026-23047, CVE-2026-23049, CVE-2026-23050,
CVE-2026-23051, CVE-2026-23052, CVE-2026-23053, CVE-2026-23054,
CVE-2026-23055, CVE-2026-23056, CVE-2026-23057, CVE-2026-23058,
CVE-2026-23059, CVE-2026-23061, CVE-2026-23062, CVE-2026-23063,
CVE-2026-23064, CVE-2026-23065, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23067,
CVE-2026-23068, CVE-2026-23069, CVE-2026-23070, CVE-2026-23071,
CVE-2026-23072, CVE-2026-23073, CVE-2026-23075, CVE-2026-23076,
CVE-2026-23077, CVE-2026-23078, CVE-2026-23079, CVE-2026-23080,
CVE-2026-23081, CVE-2026-23083, CVE-2026-23084, CVE-2026-23085,
CVE-2026-23086, CVE-2026-23087, CVE-2026-23088, CVE-2026-23089,
CVE-2026-23090, CVE-2026-23092, CVE-2026-23093, CVE-2026-23094,
CVE-2026-23095, CVE-2026-23096, CVE-2026-23097, CVE-2026-23098,
CVE-2026-23099, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23101, CVE-2026-23102,
CVE-2026-23103, CVE-2026-23104, CVE-2026-23105, CVE-2026-23106,
CVE-2026-23107, CVE-2026-23108, CVE-2026-23109, CVE-2026-23110,
CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23114, CVE-2026-23115, CVE-2026-23116,
CVE-2026-23118, CVE-2026-23119, CVE-2026-23120, CVE-2026-23121,
CVE-2026-23122, CVE-2026-23123, CVE-2026-23124, CVE-2026-23125,
CVE-2026-23126, CVE-2026-23128, CVE-2026-23129, CVE-2026-23130,
CVE-2026-23131, CVE-2026-23133, CVE-2026-23135, CVE-2026-23136,
CVE-2026-23137, CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23139, CVE-2026-23140,
CVE-2026-23141, CVE-2026-23142, CVE-2026-23143, CVE-2026-23144,
CVE-2026-23145, CVE-2026-23146, CVE-2026-23147, CVE-2026-23148,
CVE-2026-23150, CVE-2026-23151, CVE-2026-23152, CVE-2026-23154,
CVE-2026-23156, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23158, CVE-2026-23159,
CVE-2026-23160, CVE-2026-23161, CVE-2026-23162, CVE-2026-23163,
CVE-2026-23164, CVE-2026-23165, CVE-2026-23166, CVE-2026-23167,
CVE-2026-23168, CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23170, CVE-2026-23171,
CVE-2026-23172, CVE-2026-23173, CVE-2026-23212, CVE-2026-31444,
CVE-2026-43318, CVE-2026-46317, CVE-2026-53277)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8574-2: Linux kernel vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688324/unix-server/usn-8574-2-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688324/unix-server/usn-8574-2-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:01:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - CXL (Compute Express Link) drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Fastrpc Driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Ethernet team driver;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Microchip PolarFire SoC system controller driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM TDX Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Memory Management;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Networking core;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - Landlock security;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - Samsung ASoC drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2025-21709, CVE-2025-22116, CVE-2025-38426, CVE-2025-39764,
CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40150, CVE-2025-68175, CVE-2025-68239,
CVE-2025-68334, CVE-2025-68736, CVE-2025-71152, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71203, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71269, CVE-2025-71287,
CVE-2025-71288, CVE-2026-22981, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22993,
CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23104, CVE-2026-23118,
CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23171,
CVE-2026-23207, CVE-2026-23226, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23244,
CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23246, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23255,
CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23276, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23285,
CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290,
CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23292, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296,
CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23302, CVE-2026-23303,
CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23306, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23308,
CVE-2026-23310, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23313, CVE-2026-23315,
CVE-2026-23317, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321,
CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23325, CVE-2026-23330, CVE-2026-23334,
CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340,
CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23347, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356,
CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23360, CVE-2026-23361,
CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23363, CVE-2026-23364, CVE-2026-23365,
CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23369, CVE-2026-23370,
CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23374, CVE-2026-23375, CVE-2026-23378,
CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23383,
CVE-2026-23386, CVE-2026-23387, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23389,
CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397,
CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23412,
CVE-2026-23413, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23418, CVE-2026-23419,
CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23426, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438,
CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23440, CVE-2026-23441, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23447, CVE-2026-23448,
CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23456,
CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23461,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23464, CVE-2026-23465,
CVE-2026-23468, CVE-2026-23470, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475,
CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31392, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31394, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400,
CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408,
CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31412, CVE-2026-31413, CVE-2026-31414,
CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31426, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31429,
CVE-2026-31430, CVE-2026-31432, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31434,
CVE-2026-31438, CVE-2026-31439, CVE-2026-31440, CVE-2026-31441,
CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31449, CVE-2026-31450,
CVE-2026-31451, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31453, CVE-2026-31454,
CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31458, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466,
CVE-2026-31467, CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31470, CVE-2026-31473,
CVE-2026-31474, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31477, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31482, CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31487,
CVE-2026-31488, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31492, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498,
CVE-2026-31499, CVE-2026-31500, CVE-2026-31502, CVE-2026-31503,
CVE-2026-31505, CVE-2026-31506, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508,
CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31511, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31516, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31519,
CVE-2026-31520, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523,
CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31525, CVE-2026-31527, CVE-2026-31528,
CVE-2026-31530, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31542,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31548, CVE-2026-31549,
CVE-2026-31550, CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31554,
CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31556, CVE-2026-31557, CVE-2026-31563,
CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31566, CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31575,
CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584,
CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588,
CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602,
CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31604, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606,
CVE-2026-31610, CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612, CVE-2026-31613,
CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618,
CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624,
CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628,
CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31638, CVE-2026-31639,
CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31645, CVE-2026-31646, CVE-2026-31648,
CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31655, CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31658,
CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664,
CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671,
CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31675,
CVE-2026-31677, CVE-2026-31678, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680,
CVE-2026-31681, CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686,
CVE-2026-31689, CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696,
CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700,
CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31704, CVE-2026-31705,
CVE-2026-31706, CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708, CVE-2026-31709,
CVE-2026-31711, CVE-2026-31712, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715,
CVE-2026-31716, CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31722,
CVE-2026-31723, CVE-2026-31724, CVE-2026-31725, CVE-2026-31726,
CVE-2026-31728, CVE-2026-31729, CVE-2026-31730, CVE-2026-31731,
CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31740, CVE-2026-31741,
CVE-2026-31747, CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751,
CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756,
CVE-2026-31758, CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762,
CVE-2026-31763, CVE-2026-31767, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-31770,
CVE-2026-31772, CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31779,
CVE-2026-31780, CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43007,
CVE-2026-43012, CVE-2026-43013, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015,
CVE-2026-43016, CVE-2026-43017, CVE-2026-43018, CVE-2026-43019,
CVE-2026-43020, CVE-2026-43023, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025,
CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030,
CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43036, CVE-2026-43040,
CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43044, CVE-2026-43046,
CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43049, CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051,
CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43056, CVE-2026-43057,
CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43059, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061,
CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43064, CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066,
CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073,
CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079,
CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43081, CVE-2026-43082, CVE-2026-43084,
CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43086, CVE-2026-43088, CVE-2026-43089,
CVE-2026-43091, CVE-2026-43092, CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43094,
CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104,
CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43107, CVE-2026-43109, CVE-2026-43110,
CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43119,
CVE-2026-43120, CVE-2026-43129, CVE-2026-43162, CVE-2026-43245,
CVE-2026-43252, CVE-2026-43265, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43324,
CVE-2026-43327, CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43330,
CVE-2026-43332, CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336,
CVE-2026-43338, CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342,
CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43345, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43355,
CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43359, CVE-2026-43360, CVE-2026-43361,
CVE-2026-43362, CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43366,
CVE-2026-43368, CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43371, CVE-2026-43372,
CVE-2026-43373, CVE-2026-43377, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381,
CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43395,
CVE-2026-43397, CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43408, CVE-2026-43409,
CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43412, CVE-2026-43413, CVE-2026-43415,
CVE-2026-43419, CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43421, CVE-2026-43424,
CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428,
CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43436,
CVE-2026-43437, CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43441, CVE-2026-43445,
CVE-2026-43448, CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451,
CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43455, CVE-2026-43456,
CVE-2026-43457, CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466,
CVE-2026-43467, CVE-2026-43468, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43471,
CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476,
CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43483, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43488,
CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43491, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43495,
CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43499, CVE-2026-43502,
CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838,
CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842,
CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846,
CVE-2026-45855, CVE-2026-45858, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45911,
CVE-2026-45920, CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45942, CVE-2026-45943,
CVE-2026-45956, CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986,
CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45989, CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994,
CVE-2026-45996, CVE-2026-45997, CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46002,
CVE-2026-46003, CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006,
CVE-2026-46007, CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012,
CVE-2026-46015, CVE-2026-46016, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019,
CVE-2026-46021, CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024,
CVE-2026-46026, CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46033,
CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46038, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041,
CVE-2026-46044, CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049,
CVE-2026-46050, CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053,
CVE-2026-46056, CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062,
CVE-2026-46063, CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46068,
CVE-2026-46069, CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073,
CVE-2026-46075, CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078,
CVE-2026-46079, CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083,
CVE-2026-46084, CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089,
CVE-2026-46090, CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46094,
CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102,
CVE-2026-46103, CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108,
CVE-2026-46110, CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113,
CVE-2026-46114, CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46120,
CVE-2026-46121, CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124,
CVE-2026-46125, CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128,
CVE-2026-46129, CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133,
CVE-2026-46136, CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139,
CVE-2026-46142, CVE-2026-46143, CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145,
CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151,
CVE-2026-46152, CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160,
CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46167,
CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173,
CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46176, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178,
CVE-2026-46179, CVE-2026-46180, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186,
CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191,
CVE-2026-46193, CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197,
CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201,
CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46207,
CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212,
CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220,
CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46229,
CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233,
CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238,
CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46280,
CVE-2026-46282, CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286, CVE-2026-46287,
CVE-2026-46291, CVE-2026-46292, CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294,
CVE-2026-46296, CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303,
CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46312,
CVE-2026-46314, CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52920,
CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52951,
CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958,
CVE-2026-52961, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964,
CVE-2026-52967, CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970,
CVE-2026-52974, CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52981,
CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986,
CVE-2026-52989, CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993,
CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001,
CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006,
CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014,
CVE-2026-53015, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022,
CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034,
CVE-2026-53035, CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039,
CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045,
CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049,
CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53058,
CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062,
CVE-2026-53063, CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066,
CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072,
CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076,
CVE-2026-53077, CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084,
CVE-2026-53085, CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093,
CVE-2026-53094, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098,
CVE-2026-53110, CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53115,
CVE-2026-53117, CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53126,
CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53287,
CVE-2026-53289, CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294,
CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304,
CVE-2026-53306, CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53320,
CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375, CVE-2026-53376,
CVE-2026-53379, CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63843, CVE-2026-63844,
CVE-2026-63845, CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847, CVE-2026-63848,
CVE-2026-63851, CVE-2026-63852, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855,
CVE-2026-63856, CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862,
CVE-2026-63865, CVE-2026-64164)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[KONAMI detail more platform specifications for METAL GEAR SOLID: MASTER COLLECTION Vol.2]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[METAL GEAR SOLID: MASTER COLLECTION Vol.2 from KONAMI arrives on August 27th, and they've now given a bit more detail on what you'll need for it.Read the full article on GamingOnLinux.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688322/linux-tipps/konami-detail-more-platform-specifications-for-metal-gear-solid-master-collection-vol2/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688322/linux-tipps/konami-detail-more-platform-specifications-for-metal-gear-solid-master-collection-vol2/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:00:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[METAL GEAR SOLID: MASTER COLLECTION Vol.2 from KONAMI arrives on August 27th, and they've now given a bit more detail on what you'll need for it.<p><img src="https://www.gamingonlinux.com/uploads/articles/tagline_images/1864589405id29436gol.webp" alt></p><p>Read the full article on <a href="https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/07/konami-detail-more-platform-specifications-for-metal-gear-solid-master-collection-vol-2/">GamingOnLinux</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8593-1: Linux kernel vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security iss...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688306/unix-server/usn-8593-1-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688306/unix-server/usn-8593-1-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 09:46:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - PSP security protocol;
  - ARM32 architecture;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - User-Mode Linux (UML);
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Intel NPU Driver;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Auxiliary display drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Ublk userspace block driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - Buffer Sharing and Synchronization framework;
  - DPLL subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - Arm Firmware Framework for ARMv8-A(FFA);
  - EFI core;
  - FWCTL subsystem;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - I3C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device core drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Texas Instruments network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Parport drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - Chrome hardware platform drivers;
  - ACPI WMI driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - MediaTek PM domains;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - MPAM driver;
  - Amlogic Meson reset controller drivers;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - NVIDIA Tegra Control Backbone (CBB) driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thunderbolt and USB4 drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - Userspace I/O drivers;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Dual Role (OTG-ready) Controller drivers;
  - USB Serial drivers;
  - USB Type-C support driver;
  - USB Type-C Port Controller Manager driver;
  - TI TPS6598x USB Power Delivery controller driver;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - USB over IP driver;
  - vDPA drivers;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM AMD SEV Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - 9P distributed file system;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - AFS file system;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - HugeTLB file system;
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Overlay file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - DRM TTM subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Freescale ENETC Ethernet drivers;
  - Memory management;
  - Memory Management;
  - Linked list library;
  - Netfilter;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Networking core;
  - Network shaper API;
  - Network traffic control;
  - TCP network protocol;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - IPC subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - DMA mapping infrastructure;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - IRQ subsystem;
  - Kexec HandOver (KHO);
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - 802.1Q VLAN protocol;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - Ethtool driver;
  - Handshake API;
  - HSR network protocol;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - IUCV driver;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - RDS protocol;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - Key management;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - SELinux security module;
  - ALSA framework;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - AudioScience HPI driver;
  - FourSemi audio codecs;
  - Texas InstrumentS Audio (ASoC/HDA) drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - KVM subsystem;
(CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496,
CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43498, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45837, CVE-2026-45838,
CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842,
CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846,
CVE-2026-46104, CVE-2026-46105, CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107,
CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46109, CVE-2026-46110, CVE-2026-46111,
CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113, CVE-2026-46114, CVE-2026-46116,
CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46118, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125,
CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129,
CVE-2026-46130, CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133,
CVE-2026-46134, CVE-2026-46136, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139,
CVE-2026-46140, CVE-2026-46141, CVE-2026-46142, CVE-2026-46143,
CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46147,
CVE-2026-46148, CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151,
CVE-2026-46152, CVE-2026-46153, CVE-2026-46154, CVE-2026-46156,
CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46158, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160,
CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46162, CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164,
CVE-2026-46165, CVE-2026-46166, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46170, CVE-2026-46171, CVE-2026-46172,
CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46175, CVE-2026-46176,
CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179, CVE-2026-46180,
CVE-2026-46181, CVE-2026-46182, CVE-2026-46183, CVE-2026-46184,
CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46188, CVE-2026-46189,
CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46192, CVE-2026-46193,
CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201, CVE-2026-46202,
CVE-2026-46203, CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206,
CVE-2026-46207, CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46210,
CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46213, CVE-2026-46214,
CVE-2026-46215, CVE-2026-46216, CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219,
CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46221, CVE-2026-46222, CVE-2026-46223,
CVE-2026-46224, CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227,
CVE-2026-46228, CVE-2026-46229, CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231,
CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46235,
CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46239, CVE-2026-46240,
CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46242, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274,
CVE-2026-46275, CVE-2026-46290, CVE-2026-46291, CVE-2026-46292,
CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46295, CVE-2026-46296,
CVE-2026-46297, CVE-2026-46298, CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301,
CVE-2026-46302, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46305,
CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46308, CVE-2026-46309,
CVE-2026-46310, CVE-2026-46311, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46313,
CVE-2026-46314, CVE-2026-46315, CVE-2026-46317, CVE-2026-46318,
CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-46320, CVE-2026-46321, CVE-2026-46322,
CVE-2026-46324, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52913,
CVE-2026-52914, CVE-2026-52915, CVE-2026-52916, CVE-2026-52918,
CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52921, CVE-2026-52922,
CVE-2026-52923, CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52926, CVE-2026-52927,
CVE-2026-52928, CVE-2026-52931, CVE-2026-52932, CVE-2026-52934,
CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52937, CVE-2026-52941, CVE-2026-52943,
CVE-2026-52944, CVE-2026-52949, CVE-2026-52950, CVE-2026-52951,
CVE-2026-52952, CVE-2026-52953, CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955,
CVE-2026-52956, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52959,
CVE-2026-52960, CVE-2026-52961, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963,
CVE-2026-52964, CVE-2026-52965, CVE-2026-52967, CVE-2026-52968,
CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52971, CVE-2026-52973,
CVE-2026-52974, CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52976, CVE-2026-52977,
CVE-2026-52978, CVE-2026-52979, CVE-2026-52980, CVE-2026-52981,
CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52983, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985,
CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52987, CVE-2026-52988, CVE-2026-52989,
CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52991, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993,
CVE-2026-52994, CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52996, CVE-2026-52997,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53000, CVE-2026-53001,
CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53005,
CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53007, CVE-2026-53008, CVE-2026-53009,
CVE-2026-53010, CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013,
CVE-2026-53014, CVE-2026-53015, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53017,
CVE-2026-53018, CVE-2026-53019, CVE-2026-53020, CVE-2026-53021,
CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53024, CVE-2026-53025,
CVE-2026-53026, CVE-2026-53027, CVE-2026-53028, CVE-2026-53029,
CVE-2026-53030, CVE-2026-53031, CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033,
CVE-2026-53034, CVE-2026-53035, CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037,
CVE-2026-53038, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041,
CVE-2026-53042, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53044, CVE-2026-53045,
CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049,
CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53051, CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53053,
CVE-2026-53054, CVE-2026-53055, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53057,
CVE-2026-53058, CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061,
CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53063, CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065,
CVE-2026-53066, CVE-2026-53067, CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069,
CVE-2026-53070, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073,
CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53078, CVE-2026-53079, CVE-2026-53080, CVE-2026-53081,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084, CVE-2026-53085,
CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53087, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53089,
CVE-2026-53090, CVE-2026-53091, CVE-2026-53092, CVE-2026-53093,
CVE-2026-53094, CVE-2026-53095, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097,
CVE-2026-53098, CVE-2026-53099, CVE-2026-53100, CVE-2026-53101,
CVE-2026-53102, CVE-2026-53103, CVE-2026-53104, CVE-2026-53105,
CVE-2026-53106, CVE-2026-53107, CVE-2026-53108, CVE-2026-53109,
CVE-2026-53110, CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53113,
CVE-2026-53114, CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53116, CVE-2026-53117,
CVE-2026-53118, CVE-2026-53119, CVE-2026-53120, CVE-2026-53121,
CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53124, CVE-2026-53125,
CVE-2026-53126, CVE-2026-53127, CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53129,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53174, CVE-2026-53277, CVE-2026-53278,
CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53280, CVE-2026-53281, CVE-2026-53282,
CVE-2026-53283, CVE-2026-53284, CVE-2026-53285, CVE-2026-53286,
CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53288, CVE-2026-53289, CVE-2026-53290,
CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53292, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294,
CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53297, CVE-2026-53298,
CVE-2026-53299, CVE-2026-53300, CVE-2026-53301, CVE-2026-53302,
CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53305, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53307, CVE-2026-53308, CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53310,
CVE-2026-53311, CVE-2026-53312, CVE-2026-53313, CVE-2026-53314,
CVE-2026-53315, CVE-2026-53316, CVE-2026-53317, CVE-2026-53318,
CVE-2026-53319, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53321, CVE-2026-53322,
CVE-2026-53323, CVE-2026-53324, CVE-2026-53357, CVE-2026-53358,
CVE-2026-53360, CVE-2026-53364, CVE-2026-53365, CVE-2026-53367,
CVE-2026-53368, CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53370, CVE-2026-53371,
CVE-2026-53372, CVE-2026-53373, CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375,
CVE-2026-53376, CVE-2026-53377, CVE-2026-53378, CVE-2026-53379,
CVE-2026-53380, CVE-2026-63837, CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63839,
CVE-2026-63840, CVE-2026-63841, CVE-2026-63842, CVE-2026-63843,
CVE-2026-63844, CVE-2026-63845, CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847,
CVE-2026-63848, CVE-2026-63849, CVE-2026-63850, CVE-2026-63851,
CVE-2026-63852, CVE-2026-63853, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855,
CVE-2026-63856, CVE-2026-63857, CVE-2026-63858, CVE-2026-63859,
CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862, CVE-2026-63863,
CVE-2026-63864, CVE-2026-63865, CVE-2026-63866, CVE-2026-63875,
CVE-2026-63876, CVE-2026-63877, CVE-2026-63878, CVE-2026-63879,
CVE-2026-63880, CVE-2026-63881, CVE-2026-63882, CVE-2026-63883,
CVE-2026-63884, CVE-2026-63886, CVE-2026-63887, CVE-2026-63888,
CVE-2026-63889, CVE-2026-63890, CVE-2026-63891, CVE-2026-63892,
CVE-2026-63893, CVE-2026-63894, CVE-2026-63895, CVE-2026-63896,
CVE-2026-63897, CVE-2026-63898, CVE-2026-63899, CVE-2026-63900,
CVE-2026-63901, CVE-2026-63902, CVE-2026-63903, CVE-2026-63904,
CVE-2026-63905, CVE-2026-63906, CVE-2026-63907, CVE-2026-63908,
CVE-2026-63909, CVE-2026-63910, CVE-2026-63911, CVE-2026-63912,
CVE-2026-63913, CVE-2026-63914, CVE-2026-63915, CVE-2026-63916,
CVE-2026-63917, CVE-2026-63918, CVE-2026-63919, CVE-2026-63920,
CVE-2026-63921, CVE-2026-63922, CVE-2026-63923, CVE-2026-63924,
CVE-2026-63925, CVE-2026-63926, CVE-2026-63927, CVE-2026-63928,
CVE-2026-63929, CVE-2026-63930, CVE-2026-63931, CVE-2026-63932,
CVE-2026-63933, CVE-2026-63934, CVE-2026-63935, CVE-2026-63936,
CVE-2026-63937, CVE-2026-63938, CVE-2026-63939, CVE-2026-63940,
CVE-2026-63941, CVE-2026-63942, CVE-2026-63943, CVE-2026-63944,
CVE-2026-63945, CVE-2026-63946, CVE-2026-63947, CVE-2026-63948,
CVE-2026-63949, CVE-2026-63950, CVE-2026-63951, CVE-2026-63952,
CVE-2026-63953, CVE-2026-63954, CVE-2026-63955, CVE-2026-63956,
CVE-2026-63957, CVE-2026-63958, CVE-2026-63959, CVE-2026-63960,
CVE-2026-63961, CVE-2026-63962, CVE-2026-63963, CVE-2026-63964,
CVE-2026-63965, CVE-2026-63966, CVE-2026-63967, CVE-2026-63968,
CVE-2026-63969, CVE-2026-63970, CVE-2026-63971, CVE-2026-63972,
CVE-2026-63973, CVE-2026-63974, CVE-2026-63975, CVE-2026-63976,
CVE-2026-63977, CVE-2026-63978, CVE-2026-63979, CVE-2026-63980,
CVE-2026-63981, CVE-2026-63982, CVE-2026-63983, CVE-2026-63984,
CVE-2026-63985, CVE-2026-63986, CVE-2026-63987, CVE-2026-63988,
CVE-2026-63989, CVE-2026-63990, CVE-2026-63991, CVE-2026-63992,
CVE-2026-63993, CVE-2026-63994, CVE-2026-63995, CVE-2026-63996,
CVE-2026-63997, CVE-2026-63998, CVE-2026-63999, CVE-2026-64000,
CVE-2026-64001, CVE-2026-64002, CVE-2026-64003, CVE-2026-64004,
CVE-2026-64005, CVE-2026-64006, CVE-2026-64007, CVE-2026-64008,
CVE-2026-64009, CVE-2026-64010, CVE-2026-64011, CVE-2026-64012,
CVE-2026-64013, CVE-2026-64014, CVE-2026-64015, CVE-2026-64017,
CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64019, CVE-2026-64020, CVE-2026-64021,
CVE-2026-64022, CVE-2026-64023, CVE-2026-64024, CVE-2026-64025,
CVE-2026-64026, CVE-2026-64027, CVE-2026-64029, CVE-2026-64030,
CVE-2026-64031, CVE-2026-64032, CVE-2026-64033, CVE-2026-64034,
CVE-2026-64035, CVE-2026-64036, CVE-2026-64037, CVE-2026-64038,
CVE-2026-64039, CVE-2026-64040, CVE-2026-64041, CVE-2026-64042,
CVE-2026-64043, CVE-2026-64044, CVE-2026-64045, CVE-2026-64046,
CVE-2026-64047, CVE-2026-64048, CVE-2026-64049, CVE-2026-64050,
CVE-2026-64051, CVE-2026-64052, CVE-2026-64053, CVE-2026-64054,
CVE-2026-64055, CVE-2026-64056, CVE-2026-64057, CVE-2026-64058,
CVE-2026-64059, CVE-2026-64060, CVE-2026-64061, CVE-2026-64062,
CVE-2026-64063, CVE-2026-64064, CVE-2026-64065, CVE-2026-64066,
CVE-2026-64067, CVE-2026-64068, CVE-2026-64069, CVE-2026-64070,
CVE-2026-64071, CVE-2026-64072, CVE-2026-64073, CVE-2026-64074,
CVE-2026-64075, CVE-2026-64076, CVE-2026-64077, CVE-2026-64078,
CVE-2026-64079, CVE-2026-64080, CVE-2026-64081, CVE-2026-64082,
CVE-2026-64083, CVE-2026-64084, CVE-2026-64085, CVE-2026-64086,
CVE-2026-64087, CVE-2026-64088, CVE-2026-64089, CVE-2026-64090,
CVE-2026-64091, CVE-2026-64093, CVE-2026-64094, CVE-2026-64095,
CVE-2026-64096, CVE-2026-64097, CVE-2026-64098, CVE-2026-64099,
CVE-2026-64100, CVE-2026-64101, CVE-2026-64102, CVE-2026-64103,
CVE-2026-64104, CVE-2026-64105, CVE-2026-64106, CVE-2026-64107,
CVE-2026-64108, CVE-2026-64109, CVE-2026-64110, CVE-2026-64111,
CVE-2026-64112, CVE-2026-64113, CVE-2026-64114, CVE-2026-64115,
CVE-2026-64116, CVE-2026-64117, CVE-2026-64118, CVE-2026-64119,
CVE-2026-64120, CVE-2026-64121, CVE-2026-64122, CVE-2026-64123,
CVE-2026-64124, CVE-2026-64125, CVE-2026-64126, CVE-2026-64127,
CVE-2026-64128, CVE-2026-64129, CVE-2026-64130, CVE-2026-64131,
CVE-2026-64132, CVE-2026-64133, CVE-2026-64134, CVE-2026-64135,
CVE-2026-64136, CVE-2026-64137, CVE-2026-64138, CVE-2026-64139,
CVE-2026-64140, CVE-2026-64141, CVE-2026-64142, CVE-2026-64143,
CVE-2026-64144, CVE-2026-64145, CVE-2026-64146, CVE-2026-64147,
CVE-2026-64148, CVE-2026-64149, CVE-2026-64150, CVE-2026-64151,
CVE-2026-64152, CVE-2026-64153, CVE-2026-64154, CVE-2026-64155,
CVE-2026-64156, CVE-2026-64157, CVE-2026-64158, CVE-2026-64159,
CVE-2026-64160, CVE-2026-64161, CVE-2026-64162, CVE-2026-64163,
CVE-2026-64164, CVE-2026-64165, CVE-2026-64166, CVE-2026-64167,
CVE-2026-64168, CVE-2026-64169, CVE-2026-64170, CVE-2026-64171,
CVE-2026-64172, CVE-2026-64173, CVE-2026-64174, CVE-2026-64175,
CVE-2026-64176, CVE-2026-64177, CVE-2026-64178, CVE-2026-64179,
CVE-2026-64180, CVE-2026-64181, CVE-2026-64182, CVE-2026-64183,
CVE-2026-64184, CVE-2026-64185, CVE-2026-64186)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Oracle July 2026 Patch Fixes 1,434 CVEs Across 334 Products]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Oracle has released its July 2026 Critical Patch Update, delivering one of its largest quarterly security releases to date. The latest Oracle security patch addresses more than 1,400 vulnerabilities across hundreds of products, with the company indicating that artificial intelligence likely playe...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688240/it-security-nachrichten/oracle-july-2026-patch-fixes-1434-cves-across-334-products/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688240/it-security-nachrichten/oracle-july-2026-patch-fixes-1434-cves-across-334-products/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 09:11:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="1250" height="768" src="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/July-2026-Critical-Patch-Update.webp" class="attachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="July 2026 Critical Patch Update" decoding="async" srcset="https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/July-2026-Critical-Patch-Update.webp 1250w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/July-2026-Critical-Patch-Update-300x184.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/July-2026-Critical-Patch-Update-1024x629.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/July-2026-Critical-Patch-Update-768x472.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/July-2026-Critical-Patch-Update-600x369.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/July-2026-Critical-Patch-Update-150x92.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/July-2026-Critical-Patch-Update-750x461.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/July-2026-Critical-Patch-Update-1140x700.webp 1140w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/July-2026-Critical-Patch-Update.webp 1250w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/July-2026-Critical-Patch-Update-300x184.webp 300w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/July-2026-Critical-Patch-Update-1024x629.webp 1024w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/July-2026-Critical-Patch-Update-768x472.webp 768w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/July-2026-Critical-Patch-Update-600x369.webp 600w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/July-2026-Critical-Patch-Update-150x92.webp 150w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/July-2026-Critical-Patch-Update-750x461.webp 750w, https://thecyberexpress.com/wp-content/uploads/July-2026-Critical-Patch-Update-1140x700.webp 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 1250px) 100vw, 1250px" title="Oracle July 2026 Patch Fixes 1,434 CVEs Across 334 Products 1"></p><span data-contrast="auto">Oracle has released its July 2026 Critical Patch Update, delivering one of its largest quarterly security releases to date. The latest Oracle security patch addresses more than 1,400 vulnerabilities across hundreds of products, with the company indicating that artificial intelligence likely played a significant role in identifying most of the flaws.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"201341983":0,"335551550":1,"335551620":1,"335559685":0,"335559737":0,"335559738":0,"335559739":160,"335559740":279}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">According to Oracle, the July 2026 Critical Patch Update contains 1,449 security patches, covering 1,434 unique Common <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/what-are-vulnerabilities/" title="Vulnerabilities" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29087">Vulnerabilities</a> and Exposures (CVEs) across 334 products. </span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"201341983":0,"335551550":1,"335551620":1,"335559685":0,"335559737":0,"335559738":0,"335559739":160,"335559740":279}'> </span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">July 2026 Critical Patch Update Covers Hundreds of Oracle Products</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335559738":160,"335559739":80}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">The latest Oracle <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/" title="security" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29089">security</a> patch spans a wide range of enterprise products and platforms. Among the affected products are Database Server, Oracle APEX, Autonomous Health Framework, Essbase, Global Lifecycle Management, GoldenGate, NoSQL Database, Spatial Studio, SQL Developer, TimesTen In-Memory Database, Application Testing Suite, Commerce, Communications, Construction and Engineering, and E-Business Suite.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"201341983":0,"335551550":1,"335551620":1,"335559685":0,"335559737":0,"335559738":0,"335559739":160,"335559740":279}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">The <a href="https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2026.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">July 2026 Critical Patch Update</a> also includes security fixes for Enterprise Manager, Financial Services Applications, Food and Beverage Applications, Fusion Middleware, Analytics, HealthCare Applications, Hospitality Applications, Java SE, JD Edwards, MySQL, PeopleSoft, Retail Applications, Siebel CRM, Supply Chain, Systems, Utilities Applications, and Virtualization.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"201341983":0,"335551550":1,"335551620":1,"335559685":0,"335559737":0,"335559738":0,"335559739":160,"335559740":279}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">By addressing vulnerabilities across such an extensive product lineup, the Oracle security patch aims to reduce the risk posed by <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/critical-security-flaw-javascript-library-vm2/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">security weaknesses</a> that could affect organizations running Oracle technologies in production environments.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"201341983":0,"335551550":1,"335551620":1,"335559685":0,"335559737":0,"335559738":0,"335559739":160,"335559740":279}'> </span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">Hundreds of Vulnerabilities Can Be Exploited Remotely</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335559738":160,"335559739":80}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">A notable aspect of the July 2026 Critical Patch Update is the number of flaws that attackers could potentially <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://cyble.com/exploit/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" title="exploit" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29088">exploit</a> without requiring authentication.</span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Oracle stated that roughly 600 of the patches fix vulnerabilities that can be exploited remotely by unauthenticated attackers. In addition, hundreds of the addressed security flaws have been assigned critical severity ratings, emphasizing the importance of applying the latest Oracle security patch without delay.</span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Among Oracle's products, the highest number of vulnerabilities were addressed in:</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"201341983":0,"335551550":1,"335551620":1,"335559685":0,"335559737":0,"335559738":0,"335559739":160,"335559740":279}'> </span>
<ul>
 	<li><span data-contrast="auto">E-Business Suite: 410 vulnerabilities</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"201341983":0,"335551550":1,"335551620":1,"335559737":0,"335559738":0,"335559739":160,"335559740":279}'> </span></li>
 	<li><span data-contrast="auto">Fusion Middleware: 355 vulnerabilities</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"201341983":0,"335551550":1,"335551620":1,"335559737":0,"335559738":0,"335559739":160,"335559740":279}'> </span></li>
 	<li><span data-contrast="auto">Communications: 168 vulnerabilities</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"201341983":0,"335551550":1,"335551620":1,"335559737":0,"335559738":0,"335559739":160,"335559740":279}'> </span></li>
 	<li><span data-contrast="auto">PeopleSoft: 84 vulnerabilities</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"201341983":0,"335551550":1,"335551620":1,"335559737":0,"335559738":0,"335559739":160,"335559740":279}'> </span></li>
</ul>
<span data-contrast="auto">These figures highlight that some of Oracle's most widely deployed enterprise applications received a significant share of the security fixes included in the quarterly update.</span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">AI-Driven Vulnerability Discovery Appears to Have Played a Major Role</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335559738":160,"335559739":80}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">One of the most notable aspects of the July 2026 Critical Patch Update is Oracle's growing use of <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/cisa-first-chief-artificial-intelligence-officer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">artificial intelligence</a> for security research.</span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Only a few dozen of the vulnerabilities included in the release were credited to external security researchers. This indicates that the overwhelming majority of the discovered flaws were identified internally, likely with the assistance of AI-driven <a class="wpil_keyword_link" href="https://thecyberexpress.com/firewall-daily/vulnerabilities/" title="vulnerability" data-wpil-keyword-link="linked" data-wpil-monitor-id="29086">vulnerability</a> analysis.</span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Earlier this year, Oracle disclosed that it has access to leading artificial intelligence systems, including Anthropic's Claude Mythos and OpenAI's most capable models. According to the company, these <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/cisa-first-chief-artificial-intelligence-officer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">AI technologies</a> are being used to accelerate vulnerability discovery and improve the speed and accuracy of security patch development.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"201341983":0,"335551550":1,"335551620":1,"335559685":0,"335559737":0,"335559738":0,"335559739":160,"335559740":279}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Oracle also said it is applying this AI-driven vulnerability approach across its own software and cloud services, Oracle Health offerings, and the open source components that it both develops and depends on.</span>
<h3 aria-level="2"><b><span data-contrast="none">Organizations Urged to Apply the Oracle Security Patch Promptly</span></b><span data-ccp-props='{"134245418":true,"134245529":true,"335559738":160,"335559739":80}'> </span></h3>
<span data-contrast="auto">The release of the July 2026 Critical Patch Update comes amid continued efforts by <a href="https://thecyberexpress.com/cve-2026-41089-windows-netlogon-vulnerability/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">threat actors</a> to exploit vulnerabilities in enterprise software before organizations can deploy security updates.</span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"201341983":0,"335551550":1,"335551620":1,"335559685":0,"335559737":0,"335559738":0,"335559739":160,"335559740":279}'> </span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Oracle product vulnerabilities have previously been targeted in real-world attacks. The company cited examples that include the exploitation of a PeopleSoft zero-day vulnerability as well as a recently patched Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS) vulnerability.</span>

<span data-contrast="auto">Given the number of remotely exploitable and high-severity issues resolved in the Oracle security patch, organizations using affected Oracle products are advised to install the updates as soon as possible. Prompt deployment can help reduce exposure to attacks that take advantage of publicly known vulnerabilities before systems are secured.</span>

<span data-contrast="auto">With 1,449 security patches addressing 1,434 unique CVEs across 334 products, the July 2026 Critical Patch Update represents one of Oracle's most extensive quarterly security releases. </span><span data-ccp-props='{"134233117":false,"134233118":false,"201341983":0,"335551550":1,"335551620":1,"335559685":0,"335559737":0,"335559738":0,"335559739":160,"335559740":279}'> </span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[iOS 27 CarPlay: Every New Feature Coming This Fall]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple is bringing several useful upgrades to CarPlay with iOS 27, making the in-car experience smarter, more interactive, and easier to use. While this is not the biggest CarPlay update ever released, it introduces meaningful improvements across Siri, media playback, video apps, and the overall i...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688187/ios-mac-os/ios-27-carplay-every-new-feature-coming-this-fall/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688187/ios-mac-os/ios-27-carplay-every-new-feature-coming-this-fall/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:57:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple is bringing several useful upgrades to CarPlay with iOS 27, making the in-car experience smarter, more interactive, and easier to use. While this is not the biggest CarPlay update ever released, it introduces meaningful improvements across Siri, media playback, video apps, and the overall interface.



The biggest highlight is Siri AI, which finally gives CarPlay a more capable voice assistant. Alongside that, Apple has expanded video support, refreshed the design, and added quality-of-life improvements for media controls. Most of these features will arrive when iOS 27 launches publicly this fall, although some will depend on whether automakers enable support in their vehicles.



FeatureWhat's NewAvailabilitySiri AISmarter conversations, context memory, synced historyAll supported CarPlay usersVideo AppsNative video browsing and playback appsSupported vehicles onlyNew WallpapersFresh wallpapers matching iOS 27 designAll usersLiquid Glass IconsUpdated app icons across CarPlayAll usersMiniPlayerAlbum artwork and playback controlsSupported media appsAudio ScrubbingDrag through songs and podcastsSupported media apps



Siri AI Makes CarPlay Much Smarter







The biggest improvement in iOS 27 is the arrival of Siri AI inside CarPlay. Apple has redesigned Siri with a cleaner interface that appears as a glowing orb at the bottom of the screen. The design is simpler than previous Apple Intelligence versions while remaining easy to recognize during driving.



More importantly, Siri now understands natural conversations much better. Instead of responding to one question at a time, it remembers the context of your conversation, allowing follow-up questions without repeating the original request. This makes navigation, messaging, and general information requests feel much more natural.



Siri AI also answers broader knowledge questions in a way that feels similar to modern AI assistants. Whether you ask about travel plans, nearby places, or general information, the responses are more detailed and conversational than before.



Siri Conversation History Sync



Apple has also introduced conversation syncing between CarPlay and the new Siri app on iPhone.



After using Siri in your car, you can open the Siri app on your iPhone and review previous conversations. Requests made through CarPlay are clearly marked with a small car icon, making it easy to continue a conversation after leaving your vehicle.



Native Video Apps Come to CarPlay







Apple first introduced video playback in cars through AirPlay, but iOS 27 expands the experience much further.



Developers can now build dedicated CarPlay video apps that allow users to browse their content directly from the vehicle's display instead of relying entirely on the iPhone interface.



This means supported streaming services can provide a complete CarPlay experience while the vehicle is parked.



Important limitations




Videos only play while the vehicle is stationary.



Playback stops when driving begins and switches to audio if supported.



Vehicle manufacturers must enable this feature.



Older vehicles may never receive support. citeturn0search1turn0search4




Refreshed CarPlay Design



Apple has updated the visual appearance of CarPlay to match the rest of iOS 27.



Users receive a new collection of wallpapers inspired by the latest system design. The updated backgrounds closely match the look found across iOS 27 and macOS Golden Gate.



CarPlay app icons also adopt Apple's latest Liquid Glass styling, creating a more modern appearance while keeping familiar layouts intact.



Better Media Playback Controls



Media playback receives several practical improvements that users have requested for years.



New MiniPlayer



Media applications now display a MiniPlayer in the upper-right corner of the interface.



Instead of showing a simple waveform icon, the MiniPlayer includes:




Album artwork



Play and pause controls



Quick access to currently playing content




This allows users to keep playback controls visible while browsing music or podcasts.



Audio Scrubbing Finally Arrives



One of the most welcome additions is audio scrubbing.



Users can now drag the playback progress bar directly from the Now Playing screen to move forward or backward through songs, podcasts, and supported audio content. Apple has also enlarged the progress indicator, making it easier to use on a vehicle's touchscreen.



This small feature significantly improves everyday usability, especially for podcasts and long playlists.



Compatibility



The new CarPlay features require:



RequirementStatusiPhone running iOS 27RequiredCompatible CarPlay vehicleRequiredNative video appsRequires automaker supportSiri AIAvailable on supported iPhones with iOS 27



Wrap Up



CarPlay in iOS 27 focuses on practical improvements instead of introducing an entirely new interface. Siri AI is the standout addition thanks to its stronger conversational abilities and conversation history syncing, while native video apps open new possibilities for entertainment when parked.



Meanwhile, smaller upgrades such as the MiniPlayer, audio scrubbing, refreshed wallpapers, and updated icons make the overall experience feel more polished. Although some features depend on automaker support, iOS 27 delivers one of the most useful CarPlay updates Apple has released in recent years.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[This Week In Rust: This Week in Rust 661]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hello and welcome to another issue of This Week in Rust!
Rust is a programming language empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.
This is a weekly summary of its progress and community.
Want something mentioned? Tag us at
@thisweekinrust.bsky.social on Bluesky or
@ThisWeekinRu...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688059/tools/this-week-in-rust-this-week-in-rust-661/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688059/tools/this-week-in-rust-this-week-in-rust-661/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 07:18:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello and welcome to another issue of <em>This Week in Rust</em>!
<a href="https://www.rust-lang.org/">Rust</a> is a programming language empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.
This is a weekly summary of its progress and community.
Want something mentioned? Tag us at
<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/thisweekinrust.bsky.social">@thisweekinrust.bsky.social</a> on Bluesky or
<a href="https://mastodon.social/@thisweekinrust">@ThisWeekinRust</a> on mastodon.social, or
<a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/this-week-in-rust">send us a pull request</a>.
Want to get involved? <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md">We love contributions</a>.</p>
<p><em>This Week in Rust</em> is openly developed <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/this-week-in-rust">on GitHub</a> and archives can be viewed at <a href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/">this-week-in-rust.org</a>.
If you find any errors in this week's issue, <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/this-week-in-rust/pulls">please submit a PR</a>.</p>
<p>Want TWIR in your inbox? <a href="https://this-week-in-rust.us11.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=fd84c1c757e02889a9b08d289&amp;id=0ed8b72485">Subscribe here</a>.</p>
<h4><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#updates-from-rust-community">Updates from Rust Community</a></h4>


<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#official">Official</a></h5>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/16/Rust-1.97.1/">Announcing Rust 1.97.1</a></li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#newsletters">Newsletters</a></h5>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.theembeddedrustacean.com/p/the-embedded-rustacean-issue-76">The Embedded Rustacean Issue #76</a></li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#projecttooling-updates">Project/Tooling Updates</a></h5>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://tokio.rs/blog/2026-07-22-announcing-topcoat">Announcing Topcoat: a framework for building full-stack reactive web apps with Rust</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/dtolnay/syn/releases/tag/3.0.0">Syn 3.0.0</a></li>
<li><a href="https://blog.jetbrains.com/rust/2026/07/22/whats-new-in-rustrover-2026-2/">What’s New in RustRover 2026.2</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/kunobi-ninja/kobe/releases/tag/v0.35.0">kobe 0.35.0: readiness gates and cert recycling</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/Eoin-McMahon/comhad/releases/tag/v0.1.0">Comhad v0.1.0: a ranger-style tui cyberduck replacement for browsing S3</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/bigduu/Nova/releases/tag/v0.2.1">Nova v0.2.1: computer-use MCP server</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-windowing/winit/pull/4571">winit now has comprehensive cross-platform drag-and-drop support, exposing most of the power of the underlying OS APIs</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/singhpratech/crimson-crab/releases/tag/v0.1.0">crimson-crab v0.1.0 - a production-grade Rust SDK for the Claude API (streaming, tool use, prompt caching, batches)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://singhpratech.github.io/ferrovec/">ferrovec: dependency-light HNSW vector search in Rust, compiled to WebAssembly for private in-browser semantic search</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/ordokr/ordofp/releases/tag/v0.1.0">OrdoFP 0.1.0 released — a functional-programming toolbelt for Rust (HList, GAT type classes, optics, effects, monad transformers)</a></li>
<li><a href="https://freyaui.dev/posts/0.4">Freya 0.4</a></li>
<li><a href="https://dev.to/nabsei/buildline-merging-cargo-and-ninjas-build-profiling-into-one-timeline-2373">buildline: merging cargo and ninja's build profiling into one timeline</a></li>
<li><a href="https://richer-richard.github.io/cochlea/determinism.html#030-additions-2026-07-22">cochlea 0.3.0: melody read-back, MFCC timbre, a master limiter, and MIDI import for the deterministic agent-audio engine</a></li>
<li><a href="https://flodl.dev/blog/then-the-cpu-died">flodl 0.6.0: multi-host heterogeneous DDP - mismatched GPUs across hosts beat the fastest card alone</a></li>
<li><a href="https://hongnoul.github.io/hwatu/">hwatu: a daemon-based WebKitGTK browser for tiling WMs with ~13ms window spawn</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/kunobi-ninja/kache/releases/tag/v0.11.0">kache 0.11.0: broader compiler coverage and libc-aware keys</a></li>
<li><a href="https://mladedav.github.io/blog/blog/tracing-reload/"><code>tracing-reload</code> - reload layer without panics</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.opentypeless.com/en/blog/introducing-talkmore">Introducing OpenTypeless: Voice Input That Actually Works</a></li>
<li><a href="https://dev.to/booyaka101/reading-a-rust-crates-capabilities-out-of-its-compiled-symbols-58pb">Reading a Rust crate's capabilities out of its compiled symbols</a></li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#observationsthoughts">Observations/Thoughts</a></h5>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2026/07/15/battery-packs/">Battery packs: Let's talk about crates, baby</a></li>
<li><a href="https://blog.yoshuawuyts.com/capture-clauses-as-effects">Capture Clauses as Effects</a></li>
<li><a href="https://corrode.dev/blog/hardening-rust/">Hardening Rust Code For Production</a></li>
<li><a href="https://pranitha.dev/posts/tokio-gives-progress-not-ordering/">Tokio Gives Progress, Not Ordering: Scheduling 1M Tasks</a></li>
<li><a href="https://kerkour.com/rust-service-hardening-and-production-checklist">Rust service hardening and production checklist</a></li>
<li>[audio] <a href="https://corrode.dev/podcast/s06e08-rust-foundation/">The Rust Foundation with Rebecca Rumbul, Lori Lorusso, and David Wood, Rust Foundation leadership and board</a></li>
<li>[video] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAINppA0BSU">Jon Gjengset: Open Source Maintenance 2026-07-18</a></li>
<li>[video] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUoQ3uGSQA0">Rust Release Changelog - 1.97.0</a></li>
<li>[video] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/live/Doqwh1b4QyA">Livestream: Rust in Ubuntu</a></li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#rust-walkthroughs">Rust Walkthroughs</a></h5>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://kriyanative.com/blog/13-chain-breaks/">I hash-chained my agent's audit log. Then I found 13 breaks in it — all mine, all benign.</a></li>
<li><a href="https://dev.to/scripthpp/two-bugs-i-only-found-by-running-my-rust-sync-daemon-against-real-infrastructure-4278">Two tricky bugs in a Rust daemon</a></li>
<li>[video] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u91eX3J6lPU">Backend Concepts in Rust: Securely Managing App Secrets</a></li>
<li>[video] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tIrSvJFRxAg">Build with Naz - Ep 21: High Performance Flat 2D Arrays in Rust (SIMD, L1 cache)</a></li>
</ul>
<h4><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#crate-of-the-week">Crate of the Week</a></h4>
<p>This week's crate is <a href="https://github.com/medialab/xan">xan</a>, a TUI toolkit to work with CSV files.</p>
<p>Thanks to <a href="https://users.rust-lang.org/t/crate-of-the-week/2704/1630">Simeon H.K. Fitch</a> for the suggestion!</p>
<p><a href="https://users.rust-lang.org/t/crate-of-the-week/2704">Please submit your suggestions and votes for next week</a>!</p>
<h4><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#calls-for-testing">Calls for Testing</a></h4>
<p>An important step for RFC implementation is for people to experiment with the
implementation and give feedback, especially before stabilization.</p>
<p>If you are a feature implementer and would like your RFC to appear in this list, add a
<code>call-for-testing</code> label to your RFC along with a comment providing testing instructions and/or
guidance on which aspect(s) of the feature need testing.</p>
<p><em>No calls for testing were issued this week by
<a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=state%3Aopen%20label%3Acall-for-testing%20state%3Aopen">Rust</a>,
<a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=state%3Aopen%20label%3Acall-for-testing%20state%3Aopen">Cargo</a>,
<a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/issues?q=state%3Aopen%20label%3Acall-for-testing%20state%3Aopen">Rustup</a> or
<a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing%20state%3Aopen">Rust language RFCs</a>.</em></p>
<p><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/this-week-in-rust/issues">Let us know</a> if you would like your feature to be tracked as a part of this list.</p>
<h4><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#call-for-participation-projects-and-speakers">Call for Participation; projects and speakers</a></h4>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#cfp-projects">CFP - Projects</a></h5>
<p>Always wanted to contribute to open-source projects but did not know where to start?
Every week we highlight some tasks from the Rust community for you to pick and get started!</p>
<p>Some of these tasks may also have mentors available, visit the task page for more information.</p>



<ul>
<li><em>No Calls for participation were submitted this week.</em></li>
</ul>
<p>If you are a Rust project owner and are looking for contributors, please submit tasks <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/this-week-in-rust?tab=readme-ov-file#call-for-participation-guidelines">here</a> or through a <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/this-week-in-rust">PR to TWiR</a> or by reaching out on <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/thisweekinrust.bsky.social">Bluesky</a> or <a href="https://mastodon.social/@thisweekinrust">Mastodon</a>!</p>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#cfp-events">CFP - Events</a></h5>
<p>Are you a new or experienced speaker looking for a place to share something cool? This section highlights events that are being planned and are accepting submissions to join their event as a speaker.</p>


<ul>
<li><em>No Calls for papers or presentations were submitted this week.</em></li>
</ul>
<p>If you are an event organizer hoping to expand the reach of your event, please submit a link to the website through a <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/this-week-in-rust">PR to TWiR</a> or by reaching out on <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/thisweekinrust.bsky.social">Bluesky</a> or <a href="https://mastodon.social/@thisweekinrust">Mastodon</a>!</p>
<h4><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#updates-from-the-rust-project">Updates from the Rust Project</a></h4>
<p>576 pull requests were <a href="https://github.com/search?q=is%3Apr+org%3Arust-lang+is%3Amerged+merged%3A2026-07-14..2026-07-21">merged in the last week</a></p>
<h6><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#compiler">Compiler</a></h6>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159256">account for async closures when pointing at lifetime in return type</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/157824">comptime inherent impls</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159115"><code>dep_graph</code>: deduplicate task reads with an epoch-filtered index recorder</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/158976">eagerly check for ambiguity in macro parsing</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/158608">implement <code>#[diagnostic::opaque]</code> attribute to hide backtraces of macros</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/158720">shrink <code>ast::Expr64</code></a></li>
</ul>
<h6><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#library">Library</a></h6>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159467">add explicit <code>Iterator::count</code> impl for <code>str::EncodeUtf16</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159296">implement <code>bool::toggle</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159528">implement <code>const_binary_search</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159302">implement <code>Debug</code> helpers via <code>Cell</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/156220">implement <code>VecDeque::truncate_to_range</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/158061">make <code>pin!()</code> more foolproof</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/158546">move <code>std::io::BufRead</code> to <code>alloc::io</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/158544">move <code>std::io::Read</code> to <code>alloc::io</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/158545">move <code>std::io::read_to_string</code> to <code>alloc::io</code></a></li>
</ul>
<h6><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#cargo">Cargo</a></h6>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159149">use PGO for Cargo</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/17238"><code>timings</code>: only report units the job queue actually ran</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/17236">do not include proc-macro deps in rustc search path args</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/17216">include SBOM outputs in fingerprints</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/17226">lazily initialize git2 fetch transports</a></li>
</ul>
<h6><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#rustdoc">Rustdoc</a></h6>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159194">fix auto trait normalization env</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159091">use PGO for rustdoc</a></li>
</ul>
<h6><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#clippy">Clippy</a></h6>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/16855">add <code>block_scrutinee</code> lint</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/17415">avoid invalid <code>ref_as_ptr</code> suggestions in const/static initializers</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/16800">detect <code>== 0</code> on unsigned types as a <code>manual_clamp</code> lower bound</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/17405">fix <code>if_not_else</code> linting on macro expanded conditions</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/17383">fix <code>needless_collect</code> suggests a suggestion that cannot be typed</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/17385"><code>non_zero_suggestions</code>: don't lint signed integer div/rem as NonZero</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/17377"><code>manual_filter</code>: don't eat comments in the <code>and_then</code> suggestion</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/17369">require the use of <code>as _</code> for indirectly used traits in clippy sources</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/17362">rewrite <code>min_ident_chars</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/16633">use <code>#[must_use]</code> determination from the compiler</a></li>
</ul>
<h6><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#rust-analyzer">Rust-Analyzer</a></h6>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22634">avoid index panic when flycheck list is empty</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22811">add capture hints to coroutines</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22813">add handler for E0572</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22483">do not assume array destructuring assignments with rest pattern are constant-sized</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22852">eagerly normalize <code>.await</code>'s <code>IntoFuture::Output</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22791">enable auto trait inference</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22792">extract variable preserving whitespace from macro input</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22832">fix coroutines not recording binding owners correctly</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22759">fix crashes in assists due to <code>.unwrap()</code> calls in SyntaxFactory</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22810">fix <code>hir</code> crate leaking bound variables from skipped binders</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22855">fix <code>InferenceContext:identity_args</code> using the wrong DefId</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22849">fix syntax bridge panic when spilting float</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22857">handle <code>enum</code> variants in next-solver <code>generics</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22818">implement lowering of HRTB</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22789">invalid <code>pattern_matching_variant</code> lowering due to recovery</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22867">merge <code>WherePredicate::ForLifetimes</code> into <code>WherePredicate::TypeBound</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22804">only write anon const ty in parent's inference result if it doesn't have its own inference</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22822">panic with a function item and a proc macro item having a duplicate name</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22827">parser to error on macro type bound</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22865">spawn proc-macro servers on requests clearing the client cache</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22782">use quote! inside <code>ast::make::expr_call()</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22793">use <code>Result</code> for the lsp-server <code>Response</code> payload type</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/22861">record expressions in types in <code>ExprScope</code></a></li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#rust-compiler-performance-triage">Rust Compiler Performance Triage</a></h5>
<p>The two most notable changes this week were <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159115">#159115</a>,
which resulted in pretty nice instruction count wins for full incremental builds on several benchmarks,
and <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/159091">#159091</a>, which enabled PGO for rustdoc, which
makes it ~3-4% faster across the board.</p>
<p>There were two large rollups with tiny performance regressions, which made it difficult to find
the offending PRs.</p>
<p>Triage done by <strong>@Kobzol</strong>.
Revision range: <a href="https://perf.rust-lang.org/?start=5503df87342a73d0c29126a7e08dc9c1255c46ad&amp;end=d527bc9bfa297ca7fd7f5ae93781eeec42073170&amp;absolute=false&amp;stat=instructions%3Au">5503df87..d527bc9b</a></p>
<p><strong>Summary</strong>:</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>(instructions:u)</th>
<th>mean</th>
<th>range</th>
<th>count</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Regressions ❌ <br> (primary)</td>
<td>0.4%</td>
<td>[0.2%, 1.0%]</td>
<td>40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Regressions ❌ <br> (secondary)</td>
<td>0.7%</td>
<td>[0.2%, 4.6%]</td>
<td>69</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Improvements ✅ <br> (primary)</td>
<td>-2.0%</td>
<td>[-6.2%, -0.2%]</td>
<td>136</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Improvements ✅ <br> (secondary)</td>
<td>-2.6%</td>
<td>[-8.4%, -0.2%]</td>
<td>119</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>All ❌✅ (primary)</td>
<td>-1.4%</td>
<td>[-6.2%, 1.0%]</td>
<td>176</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>2 Regressions, 3 Improvements, 6 Mixed; 4 of them in rollups
34 artifact comparisons made in total</p>
<p><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-perf/blob/189822607d8d09acd85c234b2c245e817591ca67/triage/2026/2026-07-21.md">Full report here</a>.</p>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#approved-rfcs"></a><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/commits/master">Approved RFCs</a></h5>
<p>Changes to Rust follow the Rust <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs#rust-rfcs">RFC (request for comments) process</a>. These
are the RFCs that were approved for implementation this week:</p>
<ul>
<li><em>No RFCs were approved this week.</em></li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#final-comment-period">Final Comment Period</a></h5>
<p>Every week, <a href="https://www.rust-lang.org/team.html">the team</a> announces the 'final comment period' for RFCs and key PRs
which are reaching a decision. Express your opinions now.</p>
<h6><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#tracking-issues-prs">Tracking Issues &amp; PRs</a></h6>
<a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#rust"></a><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20label%3Afinal-comment-period%20sort%3Aupdated-desc%20state%3Aopen">Rust</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/159298">Tracking Issue for <code>bool::toggle</code></a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/146954">Tracking Issue for vec_try_remove</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/157562">Avoid computing layout of enums with non-int discriminants</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71835">Tracking Issue for const_btree_len</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138230">Add <code>raw_borrows_via_references</code> lint</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/157572">stabilize size_of_val_raw, align_of_val_raw, Layout::for_value_raw</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/158835">rustc_passes: lint unused <code>#[path]</code> attributes on inline modules</a></li>
</ul>
<a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#compiler-team-mcps-only"></a><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues?q=label%3Amajor-change%20label%3Afinal-comment-period%20state%3Aopen">Compiler Team</a> <a href="https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/mcp.html">(MCPs only)</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/1019">Emit <code>note</code> when calling <code>rustc</code> without specifying an edition</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/1011">Let the OS handle stack growth</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/1010">Add <code>target_feature_available_at_call_site</code></a></li>
</ul>
<a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#leadership-council"></a><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/leadership-council/issues?q=state%3Aopen%20label%3Afinal-comment-period%20state%3Aopen">Leadership Council</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/leadership-council/pull/314">Deallocate post-2026 funds from PM and compiler-ops</a></li>
</ul>
<a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#unsafe-code-guidelines"></a><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20label%3Afinal-comment-period%20sort%3Aupdated-desc%20state%3Aopen">Unsafe Code Guidelines</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/558">Do the bytes of a pointer have to stay in the same order?</a></li>
</ul>
<p><em>No Items entered Final Comment Period this week for
  <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20label%3Afinal-comment-period%20sort%3Aupdated-desc%20state%3Aopen">Cargo</a>,
  <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20label%3Afinal-comment-period%20sort%3Aupdated-desc%20state%3Aopen">Language Reference</a>,
  <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues?q=is%3Aopen%20label%3Afinal-comment-period%20sort%3Aupdated-desc%20state%3Aopen">Language Team</a> or
  <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=state%3Aopen%20label%3Afinal-comment-period%20state%3Aopen">Rust RFCs</a>.</em></p>
<p>Let us know if you would like your PRs, Tracking Issues or RFCs to be tracked as a part of this list.</p>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#new-and-updated-rfcs"></a><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pulls">New and Updated RFCs</a></h5>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3984">RFC: Refactor the libs team</a></li>
</ul>
<h4><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#upcoming-events">Upcoming Events</a></h4>
<p>Rusty Events between 2026-07-22 - 2026-08-19 🦀</p>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#virtual">Virtual</a></h5>
<ul>
<li>2026-07-24 | Virtual (Girona, ES) | <a href="https://luma.com/rust-girona">Rust Girona</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://luma.com/hd8mlw56"><strong>Sessió setmanal de codificació / Weekly coding session</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-28 | Virtual (Dallas, TX, US) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/dallasrust">Dallas Rust User Meetup</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/dallasrust/events/310254777/"><strong>Fourth Tuesday</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-28 | Virtual (Washington, DC, US) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rustdc">Rust DC</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rustdc/events/315279653/"><strong>Mid-month Rustful</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-30 | Virtual (Berlin, DE) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-berlin">Rust Berlin</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-berlin/events/312045928/"><strong>Rust Hack and Learn</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-31 | Virtual (Girona, ES) | <a href="https://luma.com/rust-girona">Rust Girona</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://luma.com/uo5ek1f4"><strong>Sessió setmanal de codificació / Weekly coding session</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-01 | Virtual (Kampala, UG) | <a href="https://www.eventbrite.com/e/rust-circle-meetup-tickets-628763176587">Rust Circle Meetup</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.eventbrite.com/e/rust-circle-meetup-tickets-628763176587"><strong>Rust Circle Meetup</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-02 | Virtual (Dallas, TX, US) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/dallasrust">Dallas Rust User Meetup</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/dallasrust/events/314095294/"><strong>Rust Deep Learning: First Sunday</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-04 | Virtual (London, UK) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/women-in-rust">Women in Rust</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/women-in-rust/events/315213885/"><strong>👋 Community Catch Up</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-05 | Virtual (Indianapolis, IN, US) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/indyrs">Indy Rust</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/indyrs/events/315210367/"><strong>Indy.rs - with Social Distancing</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-07 | Virtual (Girona, ES) | <a href="https://luma.com/rust-girona">Rust Girona</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://luma.com/ii2jrwva"><strong>Sessió setmanal de codificació / Weekly coding session</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-11 | Virtual (Dallas, TX, US) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/dallasrust">Dallas Rust User Meetup</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/dallasrust/events/310254776/"><strong>Second Tuesday</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-13 | Virtual (Berlin, DE) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-berlin">Rust Berlin</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-berlin/events/313345333/"><strong>Rust Hack and Learn</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-13 | Virtual (Nürnberg, DE) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-noris">Rust Nuremberg</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-noris/events/315619609/"><strong>Rust Nürnberg online</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-14 | Virtual (Girona, ES) | <a href="https://luma.com/rust-girona">Rust Girona</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://luma.com/f2hnzrug"><strong>Sessió setmanal de codificació / Weekly coding session</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-18 | Virtual (Washington, DC, US) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rustdc">Rust DC</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rustdc/events/315604176/"><strong>Mid-month Rustful</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-19 | Hybrid (Vancouver, BC, CA) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/vancouver-rust">Vancouver Rust</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/vancouver-rust/events/314105333/"><strong>Dealing with Dependencies</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#africa">Africa</a></h5>
<ul>
<li>2026-08-11 | Johannesburg, ZA | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/johannesburg-rust-meetup">Johannesburg Rust Meetup</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/johannesburg-rust-meetup/events/315750593/"><strong>Rust's extended standard library</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#asia">Asia</a></h5>
<ul>
<li>2026-07-25 | Mumbai, IN | <a href="https://luma.com/mumbai">Rust Mumbai</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://luma.com/7ksabwbm/"><strong>​Rust Mumbai — July Meetup 🦀</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-26 | Pune, IN | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-pune">Rust Pune</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-pune/events/315651505/"><strong>Rust Pune: July 2026</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#europe">Europe</a></h5>
<ul>
<li>2026-07-23 | Berlin, DE | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-berlin">Rust Berlin</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-berlin/events/315484101/"><strong>Rust Berlin Talks: The next generation</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-23 | London, UK | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-london-user-group">Rust London User Group</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-london-user-group/events/315612916/"><strong>LDN Talks: July 2026 Antithesis Takeover</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-23 | London, UK | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/london-rust-project-group">London Rust Project Group</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/london-rust-project-group/events/315366453/"><strong>Rama modular service framework for Rust</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-23 | Paris, FR | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-paris">Rust Paris</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-paris/events/315309633/"><strong>Rust meetup #87</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-25 | Stockholm, SE | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/stockholm-rust">Stockholm Rust</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/stockholm-rust/events/315749994/"><strong>Ferris' Fika Forum #28</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-27 | Augsburg, DE | <a href="https://rust-augsburg.github.io/meetup">Rust Meetup Augsburg</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://rust-augsburg.github.io/meetup/Meetup_20.html"><strong>Rust Meetup #20: Julian Dickert - Supply chain security in Rust: Evaluating crates for production</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-29 | Poland, PL | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-poland-meetup">Rust Poland</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-poland-meetup/events/315582674/"><strong>Rust Poland x Kraków #10</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-30 | Copenhagen, DK | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/copenhagen-rust-community">Copenhagen Rust Community</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/copenhagen-rust-community/events/315767999/"><strong>Rust meetup #70</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-30 | Manchester, UK | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-manchester">Rust Manchester</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-manchester/events/315037685/"><strong>Rust Manchester July Code Night</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-18 | Aarhus, DK | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-aarhus">Rust Aarhus</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-aarhus/events/315683629/"><strong>Hack Night: Trust but verify the LLM</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-18 | Leipzig, DE | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-modern-systems-programming-in-leipzig">Rust - Modern Systems Programming in Leipzig</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-modern-systems-programming-in-leipzig/events/313816474/"><strong>Topic TBD</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#north-america">North America</a></h5>
<ul>
<li>2026-07-22 | Austin, TX, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-atx">Rust ATX</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-atx/events/xvkdgtyjckbdc/"><strong>Rust Lunch - Fareground</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-22 | Los Angeles, CA, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-los-angeles">Rust Los Angeles</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-los-angeles/events/315376271/"><strong>Rust LA: Rust in Distributed Systems with Flight Science!</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-22 | New York, NY, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-nyc/events/">Rust NYC</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-nyc/events/315636854/"><strong>Rust NYC: Write A Custom Coding Agent and wasm_zero</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-23 | Mountain View, CA, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/hackerdojo/events/">Hacker Dojo</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/hackerdojo/events/315418155/"><strong>RUST MEETUP at HACKER DOJO</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-25 | Boston, MA, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/bostonrust">Boston Rust Meetup</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/bostonrust/events/315582650/"><strong>Porter Square Rust Lunch, July 25</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-25 | Brooklyn, NY, US | <a href="https://flowercomputer.com/">Flower</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://partiful.com/e/Vq9fyDNCMSO7ia4ulK5b"><strong>BOG-A-THON 2</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-30 | Atlanta, GA, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-atl">Rust Atlanta</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-atl/events/313539329/"><strong>Rust-Atl</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-01 | Boston, MA, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/bostonrust">Boston Rust Meetup</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/bostonrust/events/315582653/"><strong>Chinatown Rust Lunch, Aug 1</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-04 | Boston, MA, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/bostonrust">Boston Rust Meetup</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/bostonrust/events/314660176/"><strong>Evening Boston Rust Meetup at Red Hat, Aug 4</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-06 | Saint Louis, MO, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/stl-rust">STL Rust</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/stl-rust/events/314701905/"><strong>Shipping Temporal: How a Global Rust Ecosystem Built Chrome’s Newest Web API</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-13 | Lehi, UT, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/utah-rust">Utah Rust</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/utah-rust/events/314696652/"><strong>Utah Rust August Meetup</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-13 | San Diego, CA, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/san-diego-rust">San Diego Rust</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/san-diego-rust/events/315601099/"><strong>San Diego Rust August Meetup - Back in person!</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-15 | San Francisco, CA, US | <a href="https://flowercomputer.com/">Flower</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://partiful.com/e/juWAwRs3XMWP7s9wLNWK"><strong>BOG-A-THON 3</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-18 | San Francisco, CA, US | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/san-francisco-rust-study-group">San Francisco Rust Study Group</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/san-francisco-rust-study-group/events/314997215/"><strong>Rust Hacking in Person</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-08-19 | Hybrid (Vancouver, BC, CA) | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/vancouver-rust">Vancouver Rust</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/vancouver-rust/events/314105333/"><strong>Dealing with Dependencies</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#oceania">Oceania</a></h5>
<ul>
<li>2026-07-23 | Perth, AU | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/perth-rust-meetup-group">Rust Perth Meetup Group</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/perth-rust-meetup-group/events/315451138/"><strong>Rust Perth: July Meetup!</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>2026-07-30 | Melbourne, AU | <a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-melbourne">Rust Melbourne</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://www.meetup.com/rust-melbourne/events/315039480/"><strong>Rust Melbourne July 2026</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h5><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#south-america">South America</a></h5>
<ul>
<li>2026-08-08 | São Paulo, SP | <a href="https://luma.com/calendar/cal-bif2oHITU1aVvsr">Rust-SP</a><ul>
<li><a href="https://luma.com/41oiyhtk"><strong>Rust SP - Aug/2026</strong></a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>If you are running a Rust event please add it to the <a href="https://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=apd9vmbc22egenmtu5l6c5jbfc%40group.calendar.google.com">calendar</a> to get
it mentioned here. Please remember to add a link to the event too.
Email the <a href="mailto:community-team@rust-lang.org">Rust Community Team</a> for access.</p>
<h4><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#jobs">Jobs</a></h4>
<p>Please see the latest <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/1ttbtf5/official_rrust_whos_hiring_thread_for_jobseekers/">Who's Hiring thread on r/rust</a></p>
<h3><a class="toclink" href="https://this-week-in-rust.org/atom.xml#quote-of-the-week">Quote of the Week</a></h3>
<blockquote>
<p>We were planning on publishing a blog post announcing this at the same time as making the repo public, but ran out of private repo CI usage 😭.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>– <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/1uzknzl/tokiorstopcoat_a_batteriesincluded_framework_for/oy8k2nn/">Carl Lerche on r/rust</a> about the launch of topcoat</p>
<p>Despite a lamentable lack of suggestions, llogiq is glad to have found this quote.</p>
<p><a href="https://users.rust-lang.org/t/twir-quote-of-the-week/328">Please submit quotes and vote for next week!</a></p>
<p>This Week in Rust is edited by:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://github.com/nellshamrell">nellshamrell</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/llogiq">llogiq</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/ericseppanen">ericseppanen</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/extrawurst">extrawurst</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/U007D">U007D</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/mariannegoldin">mariannegoldin</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/bdillo">bdillo</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/opeolluwa">opeolluwa</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/bnchi">bnchi</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/KannanPalani57">KannanPalani57</a></li>
<li><a href="https://github.com/tzilist">tzilist</a></li>
</ul>
<p><em>Email list hosting is sponsored by <a href="https://foundation.rust-lang.org/">The Rust Foundation</a></em></p>
<p><small><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/1v41dgv/this_week_in_rust_661/">Discuss on r/rust</a></small></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[7 Wege, Risk Assessments an die Wand zu fahren]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Wenn das Risk Assessment zu kurz greift, ist guter Rat teuer.Raushan_films | shutterstock.com



Ein Cyber Risk Assessment unterstützt dabei, potenzielle Bedrohungen und Schwachstellen für wichtige digitale und physische Unternehmens-Assets zu identifizieren, zu bewerten und zu priorisieren. Trot...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687937/it-security-nachrichten/7-wege-risk-assessments-an-die-wand-zu-fahren/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687937/it-security-nachrichten/7-wege-risk-assessments-an-die-wand-zu-fahren/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 06:09:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Raushan_films-shutterstock_2452558257_16z9.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="Manager Headache 16z9 GERMANY ONLY" class="wp-image-4022500" width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Wenn das Risk Assessment zu kurz greift, ist guter Rat teuer.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Raushan_films | shutterstock.com</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ein <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/3552765/6-risk-assessment-frameworks-im-vergleich.html" target="_blank">Cyber Risk Assessment</a> unterstützt dabei, potenzielle Bedrohungen und Schwachstellen für wichtige digitale und physische Unternehmens-Assets zu identifizieren, zu bewerten und zu priorisieren. Trotzdem stolpern in diesem Zusammenhang immer noch viele CISOs und Sicherheitsentscheider über Fallstricke, die sie daran hindern, ihre Risk-Assessment-Ziele vollumfänglich zu erreichen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Welche das konkret sind und wie man sie gewissenhaft meidet, haben wir im Gespräch mit Security-Experten herausgefunden.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">1. Einfach nur abhaken</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die wohl größte Falle im Zusammenhang mit Risk Assessments besteht darin, diese als Checkliste zu behandeln – statt als Entscheidungshilfe, die mit realem Business Impact oder Threat-Szenarien verknüpft ist. <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/shirsendu64" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Shirsendu Mondal</a>, Security-Forscher an der University of North Carolina, klärt auf: „Wenn sich Ihre Risikobewertung nur noch darum dreht, irgendwelche Kästchen abzuhaken, verlieren Sie die Fähigkeit, die tatsächlichen Risiken einer Umgebung zu Tage zu fördern. Das Ziel eines solchen Assessments sollte jedoch sein, aufzudecken, an welchen Stellen tatsächlich eine Gefährdungslage besteht.“ </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der beste Weg, diese „Selbstzufriedenheits“-Falle zu umgehen, besteht laut dem Forscher darin, einen kontextorientierten Ansatz zu fahren: „Fragen Sie konkret danach, wo sich die betreffende Ressource befindet, wer darauf zugreifen kann, welche Daten sie berührt, wie wichtig sie für den Betrieb ist und was passiert, wenn sie ausfällt. Risiken sollten stets mit den geschäftlichen Auswirkungen korreliert werden – nicht bloß mit technischen Erkenntnissen.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Eben, weil Risiken seiner Ansicht nach mehr sind als nur technische Probleme, empfiehlt Mondal Security-Entscheidern, andere Führungskräfte aus dem Unternehmen in das Security-Gefüge zu integrieren – etwa aus der IT und dem Betrieb.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">2. Ergebnisse schönreden</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Besonders in schwierigen Zeiten ist es das A und O, den Stakeholdern (und sich selbst) gegenüber ehrlich zu sein. Diese Auffassung vertritt auch <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-pablo-riboldi" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Pablo Riboldi</a>, CISO beim Softwareunternehmen BairesDev: „Wenn die Ergebnisse entmutigend sind, sollte man einfach zugeben, dass sich die Bedrohungslage deutlich schneller entwickelt hat, als über das bisherige Bewertungs-Framework abzusehen war.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anstatt einfach nur <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/3495294/schwachstellen-managen-die-6-besten-vulnerability-management-tools.html" target="_blank">Schwachstellen-Listen</a> zu übergeben, rät Riboldi dazu, konkrete Angriffsszenarien abzubilden: „Zum Beispiel, indem Sie die drei kritischsten Assets priorisieren und ein eingehendes Risk Assessment durchführen. So lässt sich auch ein unmittelbarer Mehrwert demonstrieren.“</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">3. Scope falsch einschätzen</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nicht wenige CISOs sichern Dokumentenkontrollen ab, haken Compliance-Checkboxen ab und erstellen ein Risikoregister, das den Eindruck vermittelt, dass alles in Ordnung ist. Der Schein trügt jedoch des Öfteren, wie <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/deniscalderone" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Denis Calderone</a>, CTO beim Sicherheitsdienstleister Suzu Labs, aus eigener Erfahrung weiß: „In solchen Fällen kommt es nicht selten vor, dass sich niemand die Mühe gemacht hat, zu testen, ob diese Kontrollen tatsächlich funktionieren. Oder, ob der Scope der Risikobewertung auch das abdeckt, worauf es wirklich ankommt.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der Technologieentscheider hat dazu auch ein Beispiel aus der Praxis auf Lager: „Wenn das Risk Assessment die Produktionsserver und das Unternehmensnetzwerk umfasst, der alte Dev-Rechner, ein <a href="https://www.cowo.de/a/4195045" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Drittanbieter-Portal</a> oder ein verwaister API-Endpunkt dabei aber außen vor bleiben, ist das ungünstig. Angreifer betrachten die gesamte Umgebung und finden genau den Einstiegspunkt, der zuvor als nicht bewertungswürdig erachtet wurde.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4155663/6-wege-uber-ki-gehackt-zu-werden.html" target="_blank">verschlimmere die Situation</a> laut Calderone noch: Unternehmen setzten vielfach KI-Tools ein, verknüpften diese mit internen Systemen und gewährten ihnen Zugriff auf sensible Daten – ohne dass das in die Risikobewertung einfließe. Der Experte warnt: „Wenn Ihr Risk Assessment aufgesetzt wurde, bevor Ihr Unternehmen damit begonnen hat, KI in Workflows zu integrieren, ist es bereits veraltet.“</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">4. Annahmen nicht hinterfragen</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wenn sich die Zielsetzung einer Risikobewertung in Richtung „Hauptsache bestanden“ verschiebt, stellt das vielleicht <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4149093/wenn-die-audit-falle-zuschnappt.html" target="_blank">Auditoren</a> zufrieden. Die Unternehmensleitung könnte dadurch jedoch in die Irre geführt werden, wie <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/amitbasu" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Amit Basu</a>, CIO und CISO beim Schifffahrtsunternehmen International Seaways, erklärt: „Führungskräfte und Vorstandsmitglieder sehen ein fertiges Risikoregister und gehen davon aus, dass das Unternehmen geschützt ist. Unterdessen bleiben echte Bedrohungen unberücksichtigt, weil sie nicht nahtlos in den Bewertungsrahmen passten. Dieser Fallstrick ist unsichtbar – er verbirgt sich hinter einem Dashboard.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nach Ansicht von Basu ist ein Risk Assessment nur so gut, wie die ihm zugrundeliegenden Annahmen: „Diese sollten Sie explizit dokumentieren und immer dann überprüfen, wenn sich das Business verändert, eine Bedrohungslage verschiebt oder ein Sicherheitsvorfall eine Lücke zu Tage fördert.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ein Risk Assessment, so der CISO, sei nicht als fertiges Produkt zu betrachten, sondern als lebendiger Beitrag zu einem fortlaufenden Dialog zwischen Security-Abteilung und Unternehmen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">5. Risiken nicht mit Impact verknüpfen</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Probleme in den Hintergrund zu rücken oder herunterzuspielen, fällt deutlich leichter, wenn man den Zusammenhang zwischen Risiko und Business einfach ausblendet. Das erkennt auch <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/mooreds" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dan Moore</a>, Senior Director of Strategy and Identity Standards beim CIAM-Spezialisten FusionAuth, an. Er warnt jedoch vor den Folgen dieses Gebarens: „So wird es sich diffizil gestalten, tatsächliche Risiken zu kommunizieren. Schlimmer noch: Es liefert den Mitgliedern des Security-Teams einen Vorwand, sich darüber zu beschweren, dass sie missverstanden oder nicht wertgeschätzt werden – und das beeinträchtigt die Effektivität des Teams.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der Manager erachtet es als wichtig, stattdessen konkret zu sein und zielgerichtet vorzugehen: „Verzichten Sie auf Angaben wie eine Patch-Compliance von 95 Prozent. Sprechen Sie stattdessen über das Risiko, das nicht gepatchte Systeme für das Unternehmen darstellen.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dabei seien manchen Systemen – etwa Legacy-Konstrukten, die nicht mit dem Internet verbunden sind – geringere Risiken inhärent als anderen, selbst wenn sie dieselben Patch-Probleme aufwiesen, meint Moore und empfiehlt, diese Tatsache anzuerkennen und die Reaktion entsprechend abzuwägen.  </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">6. Compliance mit Security verwechseln</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">„Compliance allein ist weder ein Garant für robuste Security, noch erfüllt sie die Mindestanforderungen für einen wirksamen Schutz“, hält <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/adrieldesautels" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Adriel Desautels</a>, CEO der Security-Beratung Netragard, fest.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unternehmen gerieten demnach besonders oft in diese Falle, wenn sie für Penetrationstests externe Firmen beauftragten, die sich auf Compliance konzentrieren und gleichzeitig „erstklassige Dienstleistungen“ versprechen. „In Wahrheit liefern diese oft automatisierte Scans, die als manuelle Tests getarnt sind“, meint Desautels.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Ergebnis sei ein falsches Sicherheitsgefühl, warnt der Manager: „Vergegenwärtigen Sie sich einfach, dass bei jedem größeren Sicherheitsvorfall der letzten zehn Jahre eine Organisation beteiligt war, die zum Zeitpunkt des Angriffs alle Compliance-Vorgaben erfüllt hatte.“</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">7. Risiken nicht vollständig verstehen</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unternehmen betrachten Risk Assessments oft als eine Art „Schwachstellenkatalogisierung“, bei der es darum geht, Lücken zu finden, Schweregrade zu erfassen und Audits zu bestehen. Letzteres heißt allerdings nicht, dass die Risiken auch verstanden wurden.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Geht es nach <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/safiraza" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Safi Raza</a>, Senior Director for Cybersecurity bei Fusion Risk Management, sollten sich CISOs darauf konzentrieren, technische Risikosignale mit betrieblichen Folgen zu verknüpfen: „Dazu muss man verstehen, welche Services betroffen sind, wie sich Störungen ausbreiten und was das für den Umsatz, die Kunden oder regulatorische Verpflichtungen bedeutet.“</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der Experte rät in diesem Zusammenhang dazu, zunächst von statischen Bewertungen zu einer kontinuierlichen, kontextbezogenen Risikotransparenz überzugehen, um sicherzustellen, dass Risiken nicht nur technisch verstanden werden.“ (fm)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dieser Artikel ist </strong><a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4189703/7-cyber-risk-assessment-gotchas-to-avoid.html" target="_blank"><strong>im Original</strong></a><strong> bei unserer Schwesterpublikation CSOonline.com erschienen.</strong></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[10 Linux-Pflicht-Tools für Netzwerk- und Security-Profis]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Wir haben zehn essenzielle Open-Source-Security-Tools für Sie zusammengestellt. 
					Foto: Omelchenko – shutterstock.com




Eine Wahl zu treffen, wenn Dutzende oder gar Hunderte von Tools zur Verfügung stehen, ist nicht einfach. So dürfte es auch vielen Netzwerk- und Security-Experten gehen, di...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687932/it-security-nachrichten/10-linux-pflicht-tools-fuer-netzwerk-und-security-profis/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687932/it-security-nachrichten/10-linux-pflicht-tools-fuer-netzwerk-und-security-profis/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 06:09:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" alt="Wir haben zehn essenzielle Open-Source-Security-Tools für Sie zusammengestellt. " title="Wir haben zehn essenzielle Open-Source-Security-Tools für Sie zusammengestellt. " src="https://images.computerwoche.de/bdb/3340356/840x473.jpg" width="840" height="473"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><p class="foundryImageCaption">Wir haben zehn essenzielle Open-Source-Security-Tools für Sie zusammengestellt. </p></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">
					Foto: Omelchenko – shutterstock.com</p></div>




<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Eine Wahl zu treffen, wenn Dutzende oder gar Hunderte von Tools zur Verfügung stehen, ist nicht einfach. So dürfte es auch vielen Netzwerk- und <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/de/" title="Security-Experten" target="_blank">Security-Experten</a> gehen, die quelloffene Security Tools für <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/k/linux-open-source,3472" target="_blank" class="idgGlossaryLink">Linux</a> suchen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In diesem Bereich gibt es eine Vielzahl verschiedener Tools für so gut wie jede Aufgabe (Netzwerk-Tunneling, Sniffing, Scanning, Mapping) und jede Umgebung (Wi-Fi-Netzwerke, Webanwendungen, Datenbankserver). Wir haben einige Experten konsultiert und zehn essenzielle <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/k/linux-open-source,3472" target="_blank" class="idgGlossaryLink">Linux</a>-Sicherheitstools für Sie zusammengestellt.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">1. <a href="https://www.aircrack-ng.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Aircrack-ng</a></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Diese Suite von Software Tools ermöglicht es, drahtlose Netzwerke und WiFi-Protokolle Sicherheitsüberprüfungen zu unterziehen. Sicherheitsprofis verwenden das Tool für die Netzwerkadministration, Hacking und Penetrationstests. Dabei fokussiert Aircrack-ng auf:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>Monitoring (Datenpakete erfassen und Daten in Textdateien zur Weiterverarbeitung durch Tools von Drittanbietern exportieren)</p></li>



<li><p>Angreifen (Replay-Angriffe, Deauthentication, Packet Injection)</p></li>



<li><p>Testing (WiFi-Karten und Treiberfunktionen überprüfen) und</p></li>



<li><p>Cracking (WEP und WPA PSK)</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Laut der <a href="https://www.aircrack-ng.org/" title="offiziellen Webseite" target="_blank" rel="noopener">offiziellen Webseite</a> funktionieren alle Tools kommandozeilenbasiert, was eine umfangreiche Skripterstellung ermöglicht. Das Tool funktioniert mit <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/k/linux-open-source,3472" target="_blank" class="idgGlossaryLink">Linux</a> genauso wie mit <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/operating-systems/" target="_blank" class="idgGlossaryLink">Windows</a>, macOS, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, Solaris und sogar eComStation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Preis:</strong> kostenlos</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">2. <a href="https://portswigger.net/burp/pro" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Burp Suite</a></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Hierbei handelt es sich um eine Testing-Suite für Webanwendungen, die für Security Assessments von Websites eingesetzt wird. Burp Suite arbeitet als lokale Proxy-Lösung, die es Sicherheitsexperten ermöglicht, Anfragen (HTTP/Websockets) und Antworten zwischen einem Webserver und einem Browser</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>entschlüsseln,</p></li>



<li><p>beobachten,</p></li>



<li><p>manipulieren und</p></li>



<li><p>wiederholen zu können.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Burp Suite hat einen passiven Scanner an Bord, mit dem Security-Profis Webseiten (manuell) auf potenzielle Schwachstellen überprüfen können. Die Pro-Version bietet außerdem einen sehr nützlichen aktiven Web-Schwachstellen-Scanner, mit dem sich weitere Schwachstellen aufspüren lassen. Burp Suite ist über Plugins erweiterbar, so dass Sicherheitsexperten ihre eigenen Erweiterungen entwickeln können.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Preis:</strong> Die Professional-Version kostet 475 Euro pro Jahr und Benutzer. Darüber hinaus steht auch eine Enterprise-Version (ab ca. 2.000 Euro jährlich) zur Verfügung, die mehrere gleichzeitige Scans ermöglicht und von Anwendungsentwicklungsteams genutzt werden kann.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">3. <a href="https://github.com/fortra/impacket" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Impacket</a></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Diese Sammlung von Tools ist für Pen-Tests von Netzwerkprotokollen und -diensten unerlässlich. Impacket wurde von SecureAuth entwickelt und ist eine Sammlung von Python Classes, um mit Netzwerkprotokollen zu arbeiten. Impacket konzentriert sich auf die Bereitstellung von Low-Level-Zugriff auf Pakete und bei einigen Protokollen wie SMB1-3 und MSRPC auf die Protokollimplementierung selbst. Sicherheitsexperten können Pakete von Grund auf neu konstruieren, aber auch auf Grundlage geparster Rohdaten. Die objektorientierte <a title="API" href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/2790525/was-sie-ueber-application-programming-interfaces-wissen-muessen.html" target="_blank">API</a> macht es zudem einfach, mit tiefen Protokollhierarchien zu arbeiten. Impacket unterstützt die folgenden Protokolle:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>Ethernet, Linux;</p></li>



<li><p>IP, TCP, UDP, ICMP, IGMP, ARP;</p></li>



<li><p>IPv4 und IPv6;</p></li>



<li><p>Umgänglicher zeigte sich Musk gegenüber den Anzeigenkunden von Twitter. In einem – natürlich auf Twitter geposteten – Brief erklärte der Tesla-Chef, der Grund für die Übernahme sei nicht, damit noch mehr Geld zu verdienen. Vielmehr sei es “wichtig für den Fortbestand der Zivilisation, einen gemeinsamen digitalen Treffpunkt zu haben, auf dem eine breite Palette von Überzeugungen auf gesunde Weise diskutiert werden kann.” </p></li>



<li><p>Trotz alledem dürfe Twitter nicht zu einer “für alle Nutzer freien Höllenlandschaft werden, in der alles ohne Konsequenzen gesagt werden kann”, fügte Musk hinzu. Zusätzlich zur Einhaltung der Gesetze müsse die Plattform “warmherzig und einladend” für alle sein und den Nutzern die Möglichkeit bieten, “die gewünschte Erfahrung nach ihren Vorlieben zu wählen” – ähnlich wie man zum Beispiel wählen kann, Filme zu sehen oder Videospiele zu spielen, die für alle Altersgruppen geeignet sind.</p></li>



<li><p>Plain-, NTLM- und Kerberos-Authentifizierungen, unter Verwendung von Kennwörtern/Hashes/Tickets/Schlüsseln;</p></li>



<li><p>EU-Kommissar Thierry Breton wiederum reagierte auf Musks Teet, dass der Vogel jetzt frei sein, mit der Anmerkung, “dass Twitter in Europa nach unseren Regeln fliegen muss”.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Preis:</strong> Kostenlos – Impacket wird unter einer leicht modifizierten Version der Apache Software License bereitgestellt. Die Unterschiede können Sie <a href="https://github.com/SecureAuthCorp/impacket/blob/impacket_0_9_24/LICENSE" title="hier einsehen" target="_blank" rel="noopener">hier einsehen</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">4. <a href="https://www.metasploit.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Metasploit</a></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Metasploit ist ein Exploit-Framework von Rapid7, das für allgemeine Penetrationstests und Schwachstellenbewertungen verwendet wird. Sicherheitsexperten betrachten es als “Super-Tool”, das funktionierende Versionen fast aller bekannter Exploits enthält. Metasploit ermöglicht Sicherheitsexperten, Netzwerke und Endpunkte auf Schwachstellen zu scannen und anschließend automatisiert mögliche Exploits auszuführen, um Systeme zu übernehmen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Metasploit erleichtert es mit protokollspezifischen Modulen (die alle unter der Funktion Auxiliary/Server/Capture laufen) Anmeldeinformationen zu erfassen. Sicherheitsexperten können jedes dieser Module einzeln starten und konfigurieren – zudem steht ein Capture-Plug-in zur Verfügung, das diesen Prozess vereinheitlicht.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Preis:</strong> Metasploit Pro kostet – inklusive kommerziellem Support durch Rapid7 – ab 12.000 Dollar pro Jahr. Es gibt aber auch eine kostenlose Version.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">5. <a href="https://nmap.org/ncat/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ncat</a></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der Nachfolger des beliebten Tools Netcat heißt Ncat und kommt von den Machern von Nmap. Das Tool ermöglicht es, Daten per Kommandozeile über ein Netzwerk zu lesen und zu schreiben, bietet aber auch zusätzlich Funktionen wie SSL-Verschlüsselung. Sicherheitsexperten zufolge ist Ncat unerlässlich geworden, um TCP/UDP-Clients und -Server zu hosten und Daten von Angreifer- und Opfersystemen zu empfangen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ncat ist auch ein beliebtes Tool, um eine Reverse Shell einzurichten oder Daten zu exfiltrieren. Es wurde als zuverlässiges Back-End-Tool entwickelt, um Netzwerkverbindungen zu anderen Anwendungen und Benutzern herzustellen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Preis:</strong> kostenlos</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">6. <a href="https://nmap.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Nmap</a></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dieses Netzwerk-Scanning- und Mapping-Tool auf Kommandozeilen-Basis findet zugängliche Ports auf Remote Devices. Viele Sicherheitsexperten halten Nmap für eines der wichtigsten und effektivsten Tools – insbesondere im Bereich Penetration Testing ist es unerlässlich.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Skripting-Engine von Nmap erkennt anschließend automatisiert weitere Schwachstellen und nutzt diese aus. Nmap unterstützt Dutzende fortschrittlicher Techniken, um Netzwerke mit IP-Filtern, Firewalls, Routern und anderen Hindernissen abzubilden. Dazu gehören auch zahlreiche Mechanismen, um TCP- und UDP-Ports zu scannen, Betriebssysteme und Versionen sowie Ping-Sweeps zu erkennen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Preis:</strong> kostenlos</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">7. <a href="https://github.com/haad/proxychains" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">ProxyChains</a></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dieses Werkzeug – der De-facto-Standard für Netzwerk-Tunneling – ermöglicht es Sicherheitsexperten, Proxy-Befehle von ihrem angreifenden <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/k/linux-open-source,3472" target="_blank" class="idgGlossaryLink">Linux</a>-Rechner aus über verschiedene kompromittierte Rechner zu senden, um Netzwerkgrenzen und Firewalls zu überwinden und dabei einer Entdeckung zu entgehen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ProxyChains leitet den TCP-Verkehr von Penetrationstestern durch die folgenden Proxys: TOR, SOCKS und HTTP. ProxyChains ist mit TCP-Aufklärungs-Tools wie NMAP kompatibel und verwendet standardmäßig das TOR-Netzwerk. Sicherheitsexperten verwenden ProxyChains auch bei der IDS/IPS-Erkennung.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Preis:</strong> kostenlos</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">8. <a href="https://github.com/SpiderLabs/Responder" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Responder</a></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Responder ist ein NBT-NS (NetBIOS Name Service), LLMNR (Link-Local Multicast Name Resolution) und mDNS (Multicast DNS) Poisoner. Penetration Tester nutzen das Tool, um Angriffe zu simulieren, die darauf abzielen, Anmeldeinformationen und andere Daten während des Prozesses der Namensauflösung zu stehlen, wenn der DNS-Server keinen Eintrag findet. Ab Version 3.1.1.0 bietet Responder standardmäßig vollen IPv6-Support.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Preis:</strong> kostenlos</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">9. <a href="https://sqlmap.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">sqlmap</a></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das <a class="idgGlossaryLink" href="https://www.computerwoche.de/k/linux-open-source,3472" target="_blank">Open-Source</a>-Tool sqlmap richtet sich ebenfalls an Penetrationstester und automatisiert den Prozess, SQL-Injection-Fehler zu erkennen, mit deren Hilfe Datenbankserver kompromittiert werden könnten. Das Tool verfügt über eine leistungsstarke Erkennungs-Engine und bietet zahlreiche Funktionen, darunter Datenbank-Fingerprinting und die Ausführung von Befehlen auf Betriebssystemebene über Out-of-Band-Verbindungen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sqlmap unterstützt eine breite Palette von Datenbankservern, darunter:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><p>MySQL,</p></li>



<li><p>Oracle,</p></li>



<li><p>PostgreSQL,</p></li>



<li><p>Microsoft SQL Server,</p></li>



<li><p>Microsoft Access,</p></li>



<li><p>IBM DB2,</p></li>



<li><p>SQLite,</p></li>



<li><p>Firebird,</p></li>



<li><p>Sybase,</p></li>



<li><p>SAP MaxDB und</p></li>



<li><p>HSQLDB.</p></li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Preis:</strong> kostenlos</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">10. <a href="https://www.wireshark.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Wireshark</a></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Netzwerkprotokoll-Analyse-Tool Wireshark wird auch oft als Network Interface Sniffer bezeichnet. Mit Wireshark können Sicherheitsexperten das Netzwerkverhalten eines Geräts beobachten, um zu sehen, mit welchen anderen Geräten es kommuniziert und warum.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sicherheitsexperten zufolge eignet sich Wireshark hervorragend, um herauszufinden, wo sich DNS-Server und andere Dienste befinden, mit denen sich ein Netzwerk weiter kompromittieren lässt. Wireshark läuft nicht nur unter <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/k/linux-open-source,3472" target="_blank" class="idgGlossaryLink">Linux</a>, sondern funktioniert mit den allen gängigen Betriebssystemen, einschließlich <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/operating-systems/" target="_blank" class="idgGlossaryLink">Windows</a>, MacOs und Unix.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Preis:</strong> kostenlos </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(fm)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dieser Beitrag ist <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/970926/10-essential-linux-security-tools-for-network-professionals-and-security-practitioners.html" target="_blank">im Original</a> bei unserer Schwesterpublikation Networkworld.com erschienen.</strong></p>
</div></div></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Digitale Selbstbestimmung: OnionHop leitet euren gesamten Datenverkehr durch das Tor-Netzwerk (Linux/Win/Mac)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[OnionHop – Überblick OnionHop — route your traffic through Tor, with clear controls ist ein moderner plattformübergreifender Desktop-Client (für Windows, Linux und macOS) mit starkem Fokus auf Privatsphäre. Er ermöglicht es Nutzern, ihren Datenverkehr über das Tor-Netzwerk zu leiten. Es handelt s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687868/it-security-nachrichten/digitale-selbstbestimmung-onionhop-leitet-euren-gesamten-datenverkehr-durch-das-tor-netzwerk-linuxwinmac/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687868/it-security-nachrichten/digitale-selbstbestimmung-onionhop-leitet-euren-gesamten-datenverkehr-durch-das-tor-netzwerk-linuxwinmac/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 04:14:01 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><h1>OnionHop – Überblick</h1> <p><a href="https://www.onionhop.de/">OnionHop — route your traffic through Tor, with clear controls</a> ist ein moderner plattformübergreifender Desktop-Client (für Windows, Linux und macOS) mit starkem Fokus auf Privatsphäre. Er ermöglicht es Nutzern, ihren Datenverkehr über das Tor-Netzwerk zu leiten. Es handelt sich um ein unabhängiges Open-Source-Projekt, das nicht offiziell mit dem <a href="https://www.torproject.org/">Tor Project | Anonymity Online</a> verbunden ist. Die OnionHop Oberfläche bietet 8 Sprachen (Englisch, Deutsch, Französisch, Chinesisch, Russisch, Persisch, Aserbaidschanisch und Sorani Kurdisch).</p> <p>Melden Sie sich freiwillig als Snowflake-Proxy helfen Sie zensierten Benutzern, Tor direkt von den Einstellungen aus zu erreichen (siehe Einstellungen).</p> <h1>Hauptfunktionen</h1> <ul> <li><strong>Proxy-Modus:</strong> Leitet den Datenverkehr ressourcenschonend über einen lokalen SOCKS-Proxy um, ohne dass Administratorrechte benötigt werden. Ein Knopfdruck auf "System Proxy: On" und alle gängigen Browser benutzen das Tor Netzwerk.</li> <li><strong>TUN-Modus (eigene virutelle Netzwerkkarte):</strong> Leitet den Datenverkehr des gesamten Systems (alle Apps) mit einem Klick über das Tor-Netzwerk um.</li> <li><strong>Split-Tunneling:</strong> Ermöglicht die individuelle Auswahl, welche Apps über Tor laufen und welche direkte Verbindungen nutzen.</li> <li><strong>Kill-Switch:</strong> Blockiert den ausgehenden Datenverkehr sofort, wenn die Tor-Verbindung abbricht, um ungeschützte Datenlecks zu verhindern.</li> <li><strong>DNS-Steuerung:</strong> Erzwingt DNS-Anfragen über Tor und verhindert Lecks zum Internetanbieter (inklusive QUIC/UDP-Leckschutz).</li> <li><strong>Länder- &amp; Seiten-Routing:</strong> Erlaubt direkte Verbindungen für bestimmte Länder oder das Blockieren von Domains basierend auf automatisch aktualisierten Listen.</li> <li><strong>CLI-Client:</strong> Bietet eine Kommandozeilenversion ohne grafische Oberfläche, ideal für Server und Automatisierungen. Zensurumgehung und Netzwerktechnologien</li> <li><strong>Smart Connect:</strong> Wählt automatisch die optimale Engine, Route und Bridge für das aktuelle Netzwerk.</li> <li><strong>Integrierter Bridge-Scanner:</strong> Sucht und testet automatisch funktionierende Brücken (Bridges) in restriktiven Netzwerken, sodass keine manuelle Eingabe erforderlich ist.</li> <li><strong>Pluggable Transports:</strong> Unterstützt Protokolle wie obfs4, snowflake, webtunnel, conjure, meek, dnstt und vanilla, um Netzwerkblockaden zu umgehen.</li> <li><strong>Tor-Engines:</strong> Nutzt Classic (tor), Arti (<a href="https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/core/arti/-/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md"><em>A Rust Tor Implementation</em></a> <em>(Gitlab Changelog) oder</em> <a href="https://arti.torproject.org/"><em>https://arti.torproject.org/</em></a> <em>für die Nerds</em> <a href="https://dspacemainprd01.lib.uwaterloo.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/538e4dac-759f-4677-a8f6-10cc83482165/content#:~:text=We%20illustrate%20an%20example%20of%20this%20occurrence,our%20proposal%2C%20and%20details%20about%20its%20implementation">Improving Tor using a TCP-over-DTLS Tunnel (PDF, englisch)</a><em>, bald schon mit UDP Unterstützung</em> <a href="https://spec.torproject.org/proposals/348-udp-app-support.html">339 / 348-udp-app-support - Tor design proposals</a> <em>(Tor Architektur), dies ist die Zukunft von Tor, weg von C mit seinen historisch vielen Buffer Overflows ~65% aller Tor Sicherheitslücken, mit RPC-Schnittstelle (Remote Procedure Call / Methodenaufruf auf entfernten Systemen / Software) und UDP für moderne Anwendungen)</em></li> </ul> <p>Da Transparenz bei Software für die informationelle Selbstbestimmung das Wichtigste ist, ist das gesamte Projekt <strong>quelloffen (Open Source)</strong>. Ihr könnt euch den Quellcode jederzeit auf GitHub ansehen, ihn selbst kompilieren oder Code-Überprüfungen (Code Reviews) durchführen:</p> <p>👉 <strong>GitHub-Repository:</strong> <a href="https://github.com/center2055/OnionHop">center2055/OnionHop: Privacy-first Desktop app that routes your traffic through Tor - Anonymous browsing made simple</a></p> <p>Die Software steht für <strong>Linux, Windows und macOS</strong> zur Verfügung (es gibt auch tragbare Versionen, die nicht installiert werden müssen). <strong>Neben</strong> der <strong>grafischen Oberfläche</strong> gibt es für Automatisierungen auch eine <strong>reine Kommandozeilen-Version (CLI)</strong>.</p> <h1>Systemweite Socks5 Proxy vs. TUN VPN-Technik Modus mit eigener virtuellen Netzwerkkarte (TUN)</h1> <p>Um zu verstehen, warum der TUN oft sicherer ist, hilft ein direkter Vergleich:</p> <table><thead> <tr> <th align="left"><strong>Eigenschaft</strong></th> <th align="left"><strong>Systemweiter Vermittlungsserver (System SOCKS5</strong> <strong>Proxy)</strong></th> <th align="left"><strong>TUN "Netzwerktunnel"(OSI Layer 3</strong>) <strong>"virtuellen Netzwerkadapter" nicht TAP wie bei VPN Layer 2</strong></th> </tr> </thead><tbody> <tr> <td align="left"><strong>Arbeitsweise</strong></td> <td align="left">Setzt darauf, dass Programme die Regeln des Betriebssystems respektieren und die Poststelle nutzen.</td> <td align="left">Zwingt den gesamten Netzwerkverkehr auf tiefer Ebene durch einen Trichter.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="left"><strong>Zuverlässigkeit</strong></td> <td align="left">Manche Programme (z. B. bestimmte Spiele oder Hintergrunddienste) ignorieren diese Einstellungen und funken direkt ins Internet.</td> <td align="left">Fängt alles ab, völlig unabhängig davon, wie das einzelne Programm programmiert ist.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="left"><strong>Schutz vor Datenlecks</strong></td> <td align="left">Es kann vorkommen, dass Informationen (wie Adressanfragen) ungeschützt nach außen dringen (Datenlecks).</td> <td align="left">Bietet einen sehr hohen Schutz vor Datenlecks, da kein Datenpaket die Straßensperre umgehen kann. Eigenschaft Systemweiter Vermittlungsserver (SOCK5 Proxy) TUN-ModusArbeitsweise Setzt darauf, dass Programme die Regeln des Betriebssystems respektieren und die Poststelle nutzen. Zwingt den gesamten Netzwerkverkehr auf tiefer Ebene durch einen Trichter. Zuverlässigkeit Manche Programme (z. B. bestimmte Spiele oder Hintergrunddienste) ignorieren diese Einstellungen und funken direkt ins Internet. Fängt alles ab, völlig unabhängig davon, wie das einzelne Programm programmiert ist. Schutz vor Datenlecks Es kann vorkommen, dass Informationen (wie Adressanfragen) ungeschützt nach außen dringen (Datenlecks). Bietet einen sehr hohen Schutz vor Datenlecks, da kein Datenpaket die Straßensperre umgehen kann.</td> </tr> </tbody></table> <p><strong>Zusammenfassung: Warum es beide Modi (System SOCKS5 Proxy und TUN) gibt</strong></p> <p>Genau an diesem Punkt zeigt sich, warum Werkzeuge wie OnionHop unterschiedliche Modi anbieten müssen:</p> <ol> <li><strong>Der System SOCKS5 Proxy-Modus (Anwendung muss Socks5 fähig sein z.B. alle Internet Browser):</strong> Er ist sehr ressourcenschonend und leichtgewichtig. Er eignet sich hervorragend, wenn du gezielt nur die Anwendungen über das Tor-Netzwerk leiten möchtest, die diesen Standard unterstützen (wie deinen Browser).</li> <li><strong>Der TUN-Modus "virtuelle Netzwerkkarte":</strong> Er löst exakt das Problem der fehlenden Unterstützung in Programmen. Wie wir zuvor besprochen haben, baut dieser Modus eine **virtuelle Netzwerkkarte (**sichtbar unter "Netzwerkverbindungen" unter Windows, WIN + R = <code>ncpa.cpl)</code> auf und zwingt das Betriebssystem, <strong>alles</strong> dorthin zu leiten. Hierbei ist es völlig egal, ob ein Programm von Vermittlungsservern weiß oder nicht – die Daten werden auf einer Ebene abgefangen, der sich kein Programm entziehen kann.</li> </ol> <h1>Für die Entwickler unter euch: Wie ändert man den System-Proxy eigentlich programmatisch?</h1> <p>Wer schon länger in der Softwareentwicklung tätig ist, kennt das Problem bei der plattformübergreifenden Programmierung: Ein einheitliches Vorgehen gibt es hier leider nicht. Jedes Betriebssystem kocht sein eigenes Süppchen, was bei Werkzeugen wie OnionHop unter der Haube einigen Aufwand bedeutet. Hier ist ein kleiner technischer Einblick, wie der Code das im Hintergrund löst:</p> <p><strong>1. Windows: Die Registrierungsdatenbank und WinINet</strong> Einfach nur Werte in eine Konfigurationsdatei zu schreiben, reicht hier nicht. Zuerst müssen die Werte in der Registrierungsdatenbank (im Zweig <code>HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings</code>) manipuliert werden (z. B. <code>ProxyEnable</code> auf <code>1</code> und <code>ProxyServer</code> auf <code>127.0.0.1:9050</code>). Der entscheidende Schritt ist danach aber, das System über diese Änderung zu benachrichtigen, da laufende Anwendungen (wie der Browser) die neuen Werte sonst ignorieren. Dafür muss ein Aufruf der Windows-Systembibliothek <code>wininet.dll</code> erfolgen. Über die Programmierschnittstelle (API) <code>InternetSetOption</code> feuert man die Markierungen (Flags) <code>INTERNET_OPTION_SETTINGS_CHANGED</code> und <code>INTERNET_OPTION_REFRESH</code> ab, um das System zum sofortigen Neuladen zu zwingen.</p> <p><strong>2. Linux: Die große Fragmentierung</strong> Gerade wenn man in hybriden Umgebungen (wie dem Windows-Subsystem für Linux oder mit Container-Lösungen) entwickelt, merkt man schnell: Linux hat keine zentrale Instanz für diese Einstellungen.</p> <ul> <li><strong>Kommandozeile und Hintergrunddienste:</strong> Diese reagieren fast ausschließlich auf Umgebungsvariablen wie <code>http_proxy</code> oder <code>ALL_PROXY</code>. Diese müssen durch das Programm systemweit oder in den jeweiligen Startskripten (z. B. <code>~/.bashrc</code>) gesetzt werden.</li> <li><strong>GNOME-Desktop:</strong> Hier wird die Konfigurationsdatenbank (dconf) genutzt. Programmatisch löst man das über die C-Programmierschnittstelle von GLib oder einfacher durch das Ausführen von Systembefehlen im Hintergrund (z. B. <code>gsettings set org.gnome.system.proxy mode 'manual'</code>).</li> <li><strong>KDE Plasma:</strong> Speichert die Konfiguration in Textdateien (<code>~/.config/kioslaverc</code>), die von der Software analysiert und editiert werden müssen, gefolgt von einem Befehl zum Neustart der zuständigen KDE-Dienste.</li> </ul> <p><strong>3. macOS: SystemConfiguration Framework</strong> Apple regelt das Netzwerkmanagement streng über die einzelnen Hardware-Schnittstellen (WLAN, Kabelnetzwerk etc.).</p> <ul> <li><strong>Der skriptbasierte Weg:</strong> Ein Programm ruft im Hintergrund das vorinstallierte Kommandozeilen-Werkzeug <code>networksetup</code> auf, um den Vermittlungsserver für jede aktive Netzwerkschnittstelle einzeln zu setzen (z. B. <code>networksetup -setsocksfirewallproxy "Wi-Fi"</code> <a href="http://127.0.0.1/"><code>127.0.0.1</code></a> <code>9050</code>).</li> <li><strong>Der native Weg:</strong> Die Software greift direkt über C oder Swift auf das Systemgerüst <code>SystemConfiguration</code> zu. Über die Programmierschnittstelle <code>SCDynamicStore</code> klinkt man sich in den Konfigurationsspeicher ein, schreibt ein Datenverzeichnis mit den neuen Werten in den Pfad <code>State:/Network/Global/Proxies</code> und teilt so dem Kernel die Netzwerkänderung ohne Umwege direkt mit.</li> </ul> <h1>Wie Onionhop unter Windows den Datenverkehr über virtuelle Netzwerkschnittstellen (TUN) lenkt</h1> <p>Die Magie passiert über <strong>virtuelle Netzwerkschnittstellen (TUN-Modus)</strong> und gezielte Manipulation der <strong>Wegfindung (Routing)</strong>.</p> <h1>1. Der virtuelle Netzwerktreiber</h1> <p>Windows nutzt für Netzwerkkarten die sogenannte <em>Network Driver Interface Specification</em> (NDIS). Tools wie Onionhop installieren einen virtuellen Treiber (oft auf Basis von Wintun).</p> <p>Auf der Ebene des <strong>Betriebssystemkerns (Kernel-Ebene)</strong> ist dieser Treiber eine vollwertige Netzwerkkarte. Das System sieht absolut keinen Unterschied zu eurem echten WLAN-Modul oder Netzwerkkabel. Dieser Adapter arbeitet auf der <strong>Vermittlungsschicht (Layer 3)</strong>. Er verarbeitet also reine IP-Datenpakete (Internetprotokoll) und simuliert keine Hardware-Adressen (MAC-Adressen) der tieferen Schichten.</p> <h1>2. Die Übernahme der Wegfindung (Routing)</h1> <p>Damit Windows die Daten nicht ans WLAN, sondern an Onionhop schickt, wird die <strong>Wegfindungstabelle (Routingtabelle)</strong> dynamisch angepasst, sobald die Verbindung steht:</p> <ul> <li>Onionhop fügt eine neue Standardroute (<code>0.0.0.0/0</code> – also den Weg für "alle unbekannten Ziele im Internet") hinzu, die auf die virtuelle TUN-Schnittstelle zeigt.</li> <li>Der entscheidende Trick: Diese neue Route bekommt einen niedrigeren <strong>Prioritätswert (Metrik)</strong> als der echte WLAN-Adapter. Da Windows bei konkurrierenden Routen immer den Weg mit dem niedrigsten Wert wählt, fließt der gesamte ausgehende Datenverkehr des Systems ab sofort in den virtuellen Tunnel.</li> </ul> <h1>3. Datenkapselung im Anwendungsbereich (User-Space)</h1> <p>Jetzt landen die Daten (Nutzdaten) bei der Onionhop-Anwendung, die als Hintergrunddienst läuft:</p> <ol> <li>Die Anwendung lauscht an der virtuellen Schnittstelle und fängt die IP-Pakete ab.</li> <li>Sie verschlüsselt diese Nutzdaten.</li> <li>Die verschlüsselten Pakete werden nun mit einer neuen Ziel-IP versehen (dem ersten Knotenpunkt im Onion-Netzwerk). Das nennt man <strong>Datenkapselung (Encapsulation)</strong>.</li> <li>Erst jetzt übergibt Onionhop diese neu verpackten Pakete wieder an den Windows-Netzwerkstapel.</li> </ol> <p>Die Wegfindungstabelle von Windows sieht nun diese spezifische Ziel-IP des Einsteiger-Knotens und weiß: <em>"Ah, diese IP muss über das echte Standard-Gateway des physischen WLAN-Adapters raus."</em></p> <p>Der echte WLAN-Adapter dient also nur noch als reines Transportmedium für den bereits gekapselten und verschlüsselten Datenverkehr. Die eigentlichen Programme (wie der Browser) denken währenddessen, sie sprechen mit einer ganz normalen Netzwerkkarte.</p> <p><strong>Zum Selbstprüfen für die Kommandozeile:</strong></p> <p>Wer sich das beim Testen von Onionhop live ansehen will, kann die PowerShell nutzen:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Versteckte Schnittstellen anzeigen:</strong></li> <li><code>PowerShellGet-NetAdapter -IncludeHidden</code></li> <li><strong>Wegfindung und Prioritäten prüfen:</strong></li> <li><code>PowerShellGet-NetRoute -DestinationPrefix "0.0.0.0/0"</code></li> </ul> <h1>Was ist die Abgrenzung zu einem "echten" VPN wie z.B. ProtonVPN?</h1> <table><thead> <tr> <th align="left"><strong>Eigenschaft</strong></th> <th align="left"><strong>OnionHop (Tor-Netzwerk)</strong></th> <th align="left"><strong>Klassisches VPN (z.B. ProtonVPN)</strong></th> </tr> </thead><tbody> <tr> <td align="left"><strong>Architektur</strong></td> <td align="left"><strong>Dezentral.</strong> Deine Daten fließen über drei zufällige, weltweit verteilte Knotenpunkte.</td> <td align="left"><strong>Zentralisiert.</strong> Deine Daten fließen direkt durch einen festen Server des VPN-Anbieters.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="left"><strong>Vertrauensmodell</strong></td> <td align="left"><strong>Trustless.</strong> Du musst niemandem vertrauen. Der erste Knoten kennt dich (aber nicht das Ziel), der letzte Knoten kennt das Ziel (aber nicht dich).</td> <td align="left"><strong>Vertrauensbasiert.</strong> Du musst deinem VPN Anbieter zu 100 % vertrauen, da sie deinen gesamten unverschlüsselten Datenverkehr sehen können.</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="left"><strong>Protokolle</strong></td> <td align="left">Tor transportiert prinzipbedingt <strong>nur TCP-Verbindungen</strong>. UDP (wichtig für Online-Spiele oder VoIP) wird blockiert.</td> <td align="left">Überträgt TCP, UDP und oft auch ICMP (Ping) vollständig. Eigenschaft OnionHop (Tor-Netzwerk) Klassisches VPN (z.B. ProtonVPN) Architektur Dezentral. Deine Daten fließen über drei zufällige, weltweit verteilte Knotenpunkte. Zentralisiert. Deine Daten fließen direkt durch einen festen Server des VPN-Anbieters. Vertrauensmodell Trustless. Du musst niemandem vertrauen. Der erste Knoten kennt dich (aber nicht das Ziel), der letzte Knoten kennt das Ziel (aber nicht dich). Vertrauensbasiert. Du musst deinem VPN Anbieter zu 100 % vertrauen, da sie deinen gesamten unverschlüsselten Datenverkehr sehen können.Protokolle Tor transportiert prinzipbedingt nur TCP-Verbindungen. UDP (wichtig für Online-Spiele oder VoIP) wird blockiert. Überträgt TCP, UDP und oft auch ICMP (Ping) vollständig.</td> </tr> </tbody></table> <h1>Das Virtuelle Private Netzwerk (VPN): Tiefer Eingriff auf Schicht 2 und 3</h1> <p>Ein VPN verhält sich für das Betriebssystem wie eine echte, physische Netzwerkkarte – nur eben als virtuelle Variante (Netzwerkschnittstelle). Es greift tief in das System ein und fängt den gesamten Datenverkehr ab, bevor dieser das Gerät verlässt.</p> <ul> <li><strong>Auf der Vermittlungsschicht (Schicht 3 / Network Layer):</strong> Hier arbeiten die meisten modernen VPN-Verbindungen (wie WireGuard oder IPsec). Sie verpacken (kapseln) komplette IP-Datenpakete. Das bedeutet, dass die gesamte Netzkopplung (Routing) übernommen wird. Jeder Datenverkehr – egal ob gesicherte Verbindungsaufbauten (TCP), verbindungslose Übertragungen (UDP) oder Diagnoseabfragen (ICMP, wie bei einem Ping) – wird in den verschlüsselten Tunnel gezwungen.</li> <li><strong>Auf der Sicherungsschicht (Schicht 2 / Data Link Layer):</strong> Einige VPN-Lösungen beherrschen auch die sogenannte Netzwerküberbrückung (Bridging, z. B. OpenVPN im TAP-Modus). Hier werden die rohen Datenrahmen (Ethernet Frames) übertragen. Das System verhält sich so, als wären alle Rechner über hunderte Kilometer hinweg an denselben physischen Netzwerkverteiler (Switch) angeschlossen. In diesem Modus werden sogar lokale Netzwerk-Rundrufe (Broadcasts) durch den Tunnel übertragen.</li> </ul> <h1>Das Zwiebelnetzwerk (Tor): Aufsatz auf Schicht 4 und 7</h1> <p>Tor arbeitet architektonisch völlig anders und hat mit den unteren Netzwerkschichten (Schicht 2 und 3) primär nichts zu tun. Es erstellt keine virtuelle Netzwerkkarte im Betriebssystem.</p> <ul> <li><strong>Anwendungsschicht (Schicht 7) &amp; Transportschicht (Schicht 4):</strong> Das Tor-Programm läuft lokal als Stellvertreter-Dienst (SOCKS-Proxy). Eure Software (z. B. der Browser) muss explizit so konfiguriert werden, dass sie diesen Stellvertreter anspricht. Tor nimmt diese Anfragen entgegen und wickelt den Datenstrom ausschließlich über die Transportschicht ab – und hier auch <strong>nur für das TCP-Protokoll</strong>.</li> <li><strong>Keine rohen Pakete:</strong> Tor transportiert keine IP-Datenpakete (Schicht 3) und keine Ethernet-Datenrahmen (Schicht 2). Verbindungslose UDP-Pakete oder simple Ping-Abfragen (ICMP) werden vom Tor-Netzwerk schlichtweg nicht weitergeleitet.</li> </ul> <h1>Die Konsequenz für die IT-Sicherheit (Datenlecks)</h1> <p>Aus Sicht der Informationssicherheit ergibt sich daraus ein massiver Unterschied im Gefahrenpotenzial:</p> <p>Da ein klassisches VPN auf der <strong>Vermittlungsschicht (Schicht 3)</strong> arbeitet, fängt es als Standard-Netzweg (Default Gateway) den <em>gesamten</em> Verkehr des Betriebssystems ein.</p> <p>Das Zwiebelnetzwerk hingegen ist stark anfällig für Datenlecks (Leakage), da es auf <strong>Schicht 4 und 7</strong> operiert. Wenn eine Anwendung auf dem Rechner nicht strikt an den Tor-Stellvertreter (Proxy) gebunden ist, oder wenn sie versucht, über das verbindungslose UDP-Protokoll eine Namensauflösung (DNS-Anfrage) durchzuführen, wandern diese Datenpakete unverschlüsselt am Zwiebelnetzwerk vorbei ins normale Internet. Eure echte IP-Adresse wäre in diesem Fall sofort enttarnt. Um Tor so abzusichern, dass es wie ein VPN den gesamten Rechnerverkehr schützt (auf Schicht 3 erzwingt), bedarf es spezialisierter Betriebssysteme wie <a href="https://tails.net/">Tails</a> oder dedizierter Hardware-Zwischenstationen.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Horus_Sirius"> /u/Horus_Sirius </a> <br> <span><a href="https://www.onionhop.de/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Computersicherheit/comments/1v3vcph/digitale_selbstbestimmung_onionhop_leitet_euren/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[G# language for .NET borrows from Go, Kotlin, and Swift]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[G# (GSharp) is moving forward as a programming language for Microsoft’s .NET platform, touted as bringing Go-, Kotlin-, and Swift-style ergonomics to the CLR (Common Language Runtime). The language is described by its creators as modern, simple, and accessible.



Although pre-1.0 and still growi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687865/ai-nachrichten/g-language-for-net-borrows-from-go-kotlin-and-swift/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687865/ai-nachrichten/g-language-for-net-borrows-from-go-kotlin-and-swift/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 04:08:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://github.com/DavidObando/gsharp" data-type="link" data-id="https://github.com/DavidObando/gsharp">G# (GSharp)</a><strong> </strong>is moving forward as a programming language for Microsoft’s <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2264488/what-is-the-net-framework-microsofts-answer-to-java.html">.NET</a> platform, touted as bringing <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253031/whats-the-go-language-really-good-for-3.html">Go</a>-, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2256390/what-is-kotlin-the-java-alternative-explained.html">Kotlin</a>-, and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4150248/swift-6-3-boosts-c-interoperability-android-sdk.html">Swift</a>-style ergonomics to the CLR (Common Language Runtime). The language is described by its creators as modern, simple, and accessible.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Although pre-1.0 and still growing, G# aims to be for people who want a small, predictable language with direct access to the .NET ecosystem. Developers will see imports, <code>func</code>, structs, slices, maps, channels, <code>go</code>, <code>select</code>, and <code>for in</code> iteration. Also important are nullable flow, direct calls into the CLR (Common Language Runtime), and built-in concurrency. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With G#, copyrighted in 2026, developers get value-oriented structs, reference-oriented classes, data structs, and data classes. For concurrency, G# uses <code>scope</code> for structured concurrency, <code>async func</code><strong> </strong>and <code>await</code><strong> </strong>for task-based asynchrony, and <code>async sequence[T]</code> for asynchronous streams. G# also makes use of the same <code>Task</code> and <code>Task[T]</code> types familiar from the .NET BCL (Base Class Library).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">G# documentation is <a href="https://davidobando.github.io/gsharp/" data-type="link" data-id="https://davidobando.github.io/gsharp/">available on the GitHub site</a> of Microsoft software engineer David Obando. “Every .NET type—your packages, third-party NuGet packages, the BCL—is callable from G# with the syntax you already know. CLR generics use G#’s bracket spelling, and method calls, properties, indexers, and <code>for in</code><strong> </strong>over <code>IEnumerable[T]</code> all just work,” according to the website.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A Visual Studio Code extension for G3 can be found at <a href="https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=gsharplang.vscode-gsharp">marketplace.visualstudio.com</a>. The extension adds syntax highlighting, language server features, build/run commands, and debugger configuration for <code>.gs</code> and <code>.gsproj</code> files. Developers can install the extension from within VS Code (search for “G#” in the Extensions view) or from the command line.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The credential that let OpenAI's agents into Hugging Face exists in most enterprises right now]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[When Hugging Face got hit last week, co-founder Clement Delangue suspected a frontier lab, given the agent's sophistication. He was right. Delangue said on X that after a day working with OpenAI he strongly believed there was no malicious intent and that it was mind-blowing the whole thing had ha...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687771/it-nachrichten/the-credential-that-let-openais-agents-into-hugging-face-exists-in-most-enterprises-right-now/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687771/it-nachrichten/the-credential-that-let-openais-agents-into-hugging-face-exists-in-most-enterprises-right-now/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 01:32:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Hugging Face got hit last week, co-founder Clement Delangue suspected a frontier lab, given the agent's sophistication. He was right. Delangue <a href="https://x.com/ClementDelangue/status/2079670308156645882">said on X</a> that after a day working with OpenAI he strongly believed there was no malicious intent and that it was mind-blowing the whole thing had happened autonomously.</p><p>The two OpenAI models that <a href="https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-model-evaluation-security-incident/">broke into Hugging Face</a> last week did not breach it through malice or superintelligence. They breached it through credentials and permissions they should never have been able to reach, a non-human identity failure that is the oldest problem in security rather than the newest one in AI, and the one every enterprise can actually fix.</p><p>OpenAI <a href="https://venturebeat.com/security/openais-models-broke-containment-and-cyberattacked-hugging-face-what-enterprises-need-to-know">disclosed on July 21</a> that two of its models, GPT-5.6 Sol and an unreleased, more capable model, were running a cyber benchmark called <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11086">ExploitGym</a> with their safety refusals switched off, and inferred that the answer key sat in Hugging Face's production database. Getting there took two different failures. A zero-day in a package-registry proxy let the models out of their sandbox and onto the open internet, the kind of persistence OpenAI details in its companion post on <a href="https://openai.com/index/safety-alignment-long-horizon-models/">long-horizon safety</a>, and that part is genuinely new. The breach of Hugging Face itself came the ordinary way. OpenAI's own account is that the models chained stolen credentials and further zero-days into a remote code execution path, after a series of privilege escalation and lateral movement steps. The exotic part got them to the door, and credentials walked them through it.</p><p>Hugging Face also disclosed last week that an <a href="https://venturebeat.com/security/safety-guardrails-blocked-hugging-faces-defenders-not-the-attacker-when-an-ai-agent-breached-its-systems">autonomous agent had harvested cloud and cluster credentials</a> scoped broadly enough to reach multiple internal clusters, then left a trail of more than 17,000 recorded events across short-lived sandboxes over a weekend. Both disclosures describe the same escalation. An agent lands somewhere it should not be, finds credentials scoped far wider than any task requires, and uses them to move. These are two accounts of one incident, not two attacks. The agent Hugging Face watched was OpenAI's models, and both companies describe the same ordinary escalation.</p><p>The version of this in a typical enterprise is worse, not better. OpenAI and Hugging Face are among the most security-mature organizations in the industry, and both still needed the intrusion to happen before they could see it. The average company wiring agents into Copilot or an internal assistant has neither the identity inventory nor the behavioral monitoring those two brought to bear. The same breach in a normal company would not be contained in days, it would simply go unnoticed.</p><h2>The industry is debating the wrong failure</h2><p>The reaction has split into familiar camps. Former White House AI and crypto czar David Sacks and a run of China hawks <a href="https://fortune.com/2026/07/20/hugging-face-turns-to-chinese-open-source-ai-to-fend-off-autonomous-ai-cyber-attack-after-american-ai-guardrails-stymie-defense/">seized on the guardrail paradox</a>, that commercial safety filters blocked Hugging Face's defenders while the attacking model ran with its refusals off, and that a Chinese open-weight model, z.ai's GLM 5.2, was what finally let the team finish its forensics. Hugging Face made the case for openness, arguing in an April <a href="https://huggingface.co/blog/cybersecurity-openness">blog post</a> that open models and open tooling give defenders the same capabilities attackers already have. Both arguments are about the model, and neither touches the mechanism. </p><p>Reduced refusals let the model attempt an attack, and over-scoped credentials are what let it succeed, and those have nothing to do with whether the model was open or closed, American or Chinese. Making a frontier model provably safe is a multi-year alignment problem no customer can buy or accelerate, while scoping an identity is a configuration change a team can ship this sprint. The industry is being urged to fixate on the part of this it cannot control and to treat the part it can as a footnote.</p><p>Forrester reached the same read. In a <a href="https://www.forrester.com/blogs/an-ai-security-facepalm-openais-evaluation-became-hugging-faces-incident/">blog on the incident</a>, its analysts argue that security architectures which assume benign intent will miss this failure mode, because an agent can pursue an authorized goal through unauthorized means, which is what OpenAI's models did.</p><h2>This was a non-human identity failure, and it is the oldest one in security</h2><p>Strip the science-fiction framing and what remains is a textbook case of over-privileged machine identity, the kind security teams have fought for a decade, now driven by an autonomous agent at machine speed. Machine identities already outnumber humans in most enterprises by more than <a href="https://www.cyberark.com/press/machine-identities-outnumber-humans-by-more-than-80-to-1-new-report-exposes-the-exponential-threats-of-fragmented-identity-security/">80 to one</a>, according to CyberArk research, with 42% of them carrying privileged or sensitive access, and an agent inherits whatever its identity can touch. OWASP ranks agent identity and privilege abuse near the top of its <a href="https://neuraltrust.ai/blog/owasp-agentic-ai-top-10">agentic risk list</a>, the confused-deputy pattern where inherited credentials and weak scoping let an agent reach past its mandate, and that is precisely what both July disclosures describe. </p><p><a href="https://www.ieee.org/membership/senior">IEEE Senior Member</a> Kayne McGladrey has argued in <a href="https://venturebeat.com/security/cisco-crowdstrike-rsac-2026-agent-identity-iam-gap-maturity-model">previous VentureBeat interviews</a> that enterprises keep cloning human user accounts onto agents that then wield far more permission than any human would, and this is what that looks like when the agent is a frontier model and the target is a production database.</p><p>The people closest to it read it the same way. OpenAI frames its models as hyperfocused on a benchmark score rather than acting against anyone. Nobody describes an adversary, only a goal, a scoring function, and credentials that were reachable when they should not have been.</p><p>The specific failure is easy to name once the AI framing is stripped away. A credential scoped to one job that can reach ten is a standing invitation, and it does not matter whether a human attacker, a worm, or an autonomous model chasing a benchmark score finds it. What changed in July is the finder. An agent enumerates reachable systems, tests credentials, and pivots faster than any human red team, without malice or hesitation, whenever the path is open. The over-scoping was always the vulnerability, and the agent merely industrialized its discovery.</p><p>Forrester named the control that would have blunted it. Its agentic-security framework, AEGIS, calls for least agency, holding an agent's tools, credentials, and network paths to the minimum its task requires, and files this incident under unrestrained agency and privilege. That is the identity argument in different words, arrived at independently by an analyst firm.</p><p>The data says this is where the risk now lives. Verizon's 2026 Data Breach Investigations Report <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/05/20/verizon-2026-dbir-findings/">found</a> that exploitation of vulnerabilities has overtaken stolen credentials as the top initial access vector for the first time in 19 years. That is the initial-access half. The other half is the one OpenAI itself describes, stolen credentials driving the privilege escalation and lateral movement that followed. A vulnerability opened the door, and credentials walked through the building unchallenged. Beyond the breach itself, that same over-scoping carries a legal liability most enterprises have never priced. The models' actions <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2026/07/21/openai-says-hugging-face-was-breached-by-its-pre-release-models/">likely violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act</a>, according to TechCrunch. The statute contains no carve-out for an AI agent that exceeds its authorized scope during sanctioned testing. Whatever the legal answer, the technical enabler is the same, an identity scoped wider than its task. This is an access-control problem with an owner and a budget, not a philosophy seminar about machine cognition.</p><p>Merritt Baer, Senior Advisor to Andesite, G2I, and AppOmni and former Deputy CISO at AWS, frames the underlying shift to VentureBeat as a new kind of asymmetry. Both sides now reach for the same capabilities, she said, but one side is constrained by enterprise governance, policy, compliance, and safety controls while the adversary simply downloads an uncensored open-weight model and keeps going. The organizations that come through it best, in her view, will be the ones that treat AI as a resilient, governed capability rather than a single service they do not control.</p><h2>Four moves that shrink the blast radius</h2><p>The breach worked because the agent reached identities scoped far wider than its task. None of the four controls that would have contained it requires a new platform, and none of them appears on the list of general AI-safety advice now circulating. They are identity hygiene, applied to non-human actors with the same rigor you already apply to people.</p><p><b>1. Scope every non-human identity to one task.</b> The models reached credentials that touched multiple clusters, which is what turned a foothold into a breach. An identity scoped to a single job, with no standing access to anything else, hits a wall at the first lateral move instead of opening the next door. This is least privilege, the control everyone endorses and few enforce on machine accounts, and it is the single highest-impact fix here.</p><p><b>2. Give credentials short lifetimes and rotate them hard.</b> Harvested credentials are only useful while they are valid, and both July agents worked by collecting them. Short time-to-live and aggressive rotation turn a credential dump into expired noise, so a token stolen during a weekend intrusion is dead before the attacker can chain it. Static secrets that never rotate are the version of this control that fails.</p><p><b>3. Monitor for lateral movement, not just prompts.</b> The tell in both incidents was privilege escalation and lateral movement, which a prompt filter never sees because it is watching the wrong layer. Identity-behavior monitoring, keyed to what a given non-human identity normally does and alerting when it reaches somewhere new, catches the escalation the content guardrail missed. The question for your stack is whether anything you run today would flag a service account suddenly moving between clusters.</p><p><b>4. Rehearse instant revocation before you need it.</b> When the incident is your own agent, the fastest containment is killing its identity mid-run, and that only works if the path to do it exists before the day you need it. Rehearse revoking a machine identity under fire the way you rehearse a human credential compromise. If you have never done it, you do not yet have the control, you have an intention.</p><p>The defense also worked, and that matters. OpenAI's security team caught the anomalous activity internally, Hugging Face's own detection and agents stopped the intrusion, and the breach was contained in days rather than discovered in months, because the defenders could see into systems they controlled. That visibility is the same discipline the four controls depend on. The debate over whether frontier models are safe, open, or American will run for years, and none of it will be settled in time to help the enterprise deploying agents this quarter. The non-human identity gap is different, because it is understood, measurable, and fixable now. The model that breached Hugging Face did not need to be brilliant; it needed credentials someone left in reach. The fix is scoping them before an agent finds them.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Release v1.171.0]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[1.171.0 - 2026-07-22
### Added

Added support for the OpenTofu .tofu file extension. Because OpenTofu uses the same HCL grammar as Terraform, .tofu files are now automatically detected and scanned as Terraform, so they are picked up by recursive scans and Terraform rulesets (e.g. p/terraform) wit...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687763/it-security-tools/release-v11710/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687763/it-security-tools/release-v11710/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 01:20:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾 IT Security Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><a href="https://github.com/semgrep/semgrep/releases/tag/v1.171.0">1.171.0</a> - 2026-07-22</h2>
<h3>### Added</h3>
<ul>
<li>Added support for the OpenTofu <code>.tofu</code> file extension. Because OpenTofu uses the same HCL grammar as Terraform, <code>.tofu</code> files are now automatically detected and scanned as Terraform, so they are picked up by recursive scans and Terraform rulesets (e.g. <code>p/terraform</code>) with no extra configuration. (ENGINE-2884)</li>
</ul>
<h3>### Changed</h3>
<ul>
<li>The window for collecting git contributor information during <code>semgrep ci</code> has been extended from the last 30 days to the last 90 days, to match the updated usage policy. (contributor-window-90-days)</li>
</ul>
<h3>### Fixed</h3>
<ul>
<li>Fixed a source of rare, nondeterministic crashes and incorrect results caused<br>
by an OCaml compiler bug. Semgrep now builds against a compiler fork that<br>
backports the upstream fix. (ocaml_codegen_fix)</li>
<li>Fixed excessive heap growth after explicit major garbage collections. Semgrep<br>
now builds against an OCaml compiler that improves garbage collection duty<br>
cycle pacing. (ocaml_gc_pacing_fix)</li>
<li>Improved the <code>Scan Status</code> output when no code rules will run (e.g. a<br>
Secrets-only or Supply-Chain-only scan). The summary line no longer reports a<br>
confusing "0 Code rules", and the "Code Rules" section now states explicitly<br>
either that code scanning is not enabled or that there are no code rules to run,<br>
instead of printing an empty table. (ENGINE-2878)</li>
<li>Fixed lockfileless Gradle dependency resolution failing with "Parsing<br>
dependency output failed (Resolve_gradle.gradle_resolved_dependency)". The<br>
github-dependency-graph-gradle-plugin used during resolution was fetched<br>
unpinned, and its 1.4.2 release renamed keys in its JSON output. The plugin is<br>
now pinned to 1.4.1. (sc-3738)</li>
</ul>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Firefox 153 Released with HDR Video, Smarter PDF Tools, Better Privacy, and New Linux Improvements]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[by George Whittaker
      
            Mozilla has officially released Firefox 153, bringing another round of improvements to its open-source web browser. The latest version introduces new multimedia capabilities, enhanced PDF editing tools, stronger privacy protections, better support for modern...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687760/unix-server/firefox-153-released-with-hdr-video-smarter-pdf-tools-better-privacy-and-new-linux-improvements/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687760/unix-server/firefox-153-released-with-hdr-video-smarter-pdf-tools-better-privacy-and-new-linux-improvements/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 01:17:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div data-history-node-id="1341446" class="layout layout--onecol">
    <div class="layout__region layout__region--content">
      
            <div class="field field--name-field-node-image field--type-image field--label-hidden field--item">  <img loading="lazy" src="https://www.linuxjournal.com/sites/default/files/nodeimage/story/firefox-153-released-with-hdr-video-smarter-pdf-tools-better-privacy-and-new-linux-improvements.jpg" width="850" height="500" alt="Firefox 153 Released with HDR Video, Smarter PDF Tools, Better Privacy, and New Linux Improvements" typeof="foaf:Image" class="img-responsive"></div>
      
            <div class="field field--name-node-author field--type-ds field--label-hidden field--item">by <a title="View user profile." href="https://www.linuxjournal.com/users/george-whittaker" lang="" about="https://www.linuxjournal.com/users/george-whittaker" typeof="schema:Person" property="schema:name" datatype="" xml:lang="">George Whittaker</a></div>
      
            <div class="field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field--item"><p>Mozilla has officially released <strong>Firefox 153</strong>, bringing another round of improvements to its open-source web browser. The latest version introduces new multimedia capabilities, enhanced PDF editing tools, stronger privacy protections, better support for modern web technologies, and several features aimed at improving the browsing experience across Linux, Windows, and macOS. Firefox 153 became available on the stable release channel on <strong>July 21, 2026</strong>.</p>

<p>While this isn't a major redesign, Firefox 153 delivers a collection of practical updates that benefit both everyday users and web developers.</p>

<h2><strong>HDR Video Playback Comes to Windows</strong></h2>

<p>One of the headline features in Firefox 153 is support for <strong>High Dynamic Range (HDR) video playback</strong> on compatible Windows systems.</p>

<p>Users with HDR-capable displays and Windows HDR enabled can now enjoy richer colors, improved contrast, and brighter highlights when watching supported online video content. Mozilla notes that certain laptop displays offering only "HDR video streaming" are not currently supported, and some HDR videos recorded on mobile phones may still have limitations.</p>

<p>Although this feature is Windows-specific, it represents another step toward bringing Firefox in line with modern multimedia standards.</p>

<h2><strong>PDF Editing Becomes Even More Powerful</strong></h2>

<p>Mozilla continues expanding Firefox's built-in PDF editor, eliminating the need for third-party applications in many situations.</p>

<p>Firefox 153 introduces the ability to:</p>

<ul><li>Merge multiple PDF documents</li>
	<li>Insert images as new PDF pages</li>
	<li>Continue using existing editing tools such as annotations, page organization, and text editing</li>
</ul><p>These additions make Firefox an even more capable document viewer and editor, especially for users who frequently work with PDF files.</p>

<h2><strong>Stronger Privacy and Permission Controls</strong></h2>

<p>Privacy remains one of Firefox's biggest selling points, and version 153 introduces several enhancements designed to give users more visibility and control over website permissions.</p>

<p>New improvements include:</p>

<ul><li>A visual indicator when a website is actively accessing your location</li>
	<li>More restrictive default permissions for browser extensions accessing local files</li>
	<li>Local Area Network (LAN) restrictions enabled by default for all users</li>
</ul><p>These changes reduce unnecessary exposure of local resources while making it easier to understand what websites and extensions can access.</p>

<h2><strong>Experimental JPEG XL Support</strong></h2>

<p>Firefox 153 also adds <strong>experimental support for the JPEG XL image format</strong>, which many developers consider a promising successor to older image standards.</p>

<p>JPEG XL offers several advantages, including:</p></div>
      
            <div class="field field--name-node-link field--type-ds field--label-hidden field--item">  <a href="https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/firefox-153-released-hdr-video-smarter-pdf-tools-better-privacy-and-new-linux-improvements" hreflang="en">Go to Full Article</a>
</div>
      
    </div>
  </div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[iOS 27 Code Suggests Apple Could Restrict Leased Devices After Missed Payments]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Code found in the iOS 27 beta suggests Apple is developing a system that could restrict leased iPhones when customers fall behind on payments. The discovery follows a recent Bloomberg report that Apple may soon launch a new "Apple Upgrade" leasing program, allowing customers to pay for hardware t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687698/it-security-nachrichten/ios-27-code-suggests-apple-could-restrict-leased-devices-after-missed-payments/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687698/it-security-nachrichten/ios-27-code-suggests-apple-could-restrict-leased-devices-after-missed-payments/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:18:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Code found in the iOS 27 beta suggests Apple is developing a system that could restrict leased iPhones when customers fall behind on payments. The discovery follows a recent Bloomberg report that Apple may soon launch a new "Apple Upgrade" leasing program, allowing customers to pay for hardware through monthly installments. 9to5Mac reports: The code describes a system called App Managed Features, which allows an authorized financing or provider app to enroll an iPhone and perform ongoing status checks. If the contract is no longer in good standing, Apple's system services can place the iPhone in "Restricted Mode," which blocks access to most apps until the payment or contract issue is resolved, while keeping a small set of apps available. The fixed allowlist currently found in the iOS 27 beta includes: Accessibility Reader, App Store, Health, Magnifier, Phone, Clock, Settings, Wallet, Passwords, and the Restricted Mode interface itself.
 
Apps that can send critical alerts, such as Messages, Home, and certain medication or safety apps, may also remain accessible. However, the provider appears to have some control over those exceptions. The code does not appear to cancel, suspend, or otherwise modify App Store subscriptions associated with blocked apps. As a result, a subscription could continue billing even while access to its app is restricted.
 
Additionally, there isn't a fixed number of missed payments that automatically triggers the restrictions. The financing provider's app decides when to lock the device based on its own policies. Finally, the new framework also introduces a new type of activation lock called "Partner Finance Lock," which is meant to prevent users from erasing, reselling, or stripping a restricted device for parts.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=iOS+27+Code+Suggests+Apple+Could+Restrict+Leased+Devices+After+Missed+Payments%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fapple.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F22%2F2050240%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fapple.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F22%2F2050240%2Fios-27-code-suggests-apple-could-restrict-leased-devices-after-missed-payments%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://apple.slashdot.org/story/26/07/22/2050240/ios-27-code-suggests-apple-could-restrict-leased-devices-after-missed-payments?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[FTC-Urteil erhöht Rechtsrisiken für den transatlantischen Datentransfer - Infopoint Security]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[US-Urteil bringt EU-US Data Privacy Framework ins Wanken: Digitale Souveränität wird zum Wettbewerbsvorteil. Ein Urteil aus Washington könnte die ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687478/it-security-nachrichten/ftc-urteil-erhoeht-rechtsrisiken-fuer-den-transatlantischen-datentransfer-infopoint-security/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687478/it-security-nachrichten/ftc-urteil-erhoeht-rechtsrisiken-fuer-den-transatlantischen-datentransfer-infopoint-security/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 21:56:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[US-Urteil bringt EU-US <b>Data</b> Privacy Framework ins Wanken: Digitale Souveränität wird zum Wettbewerbsvorteil. Ein Urteil aus Washington könnte die ...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Oracle’s July update fixes ten 10.0 vulnerabilities in Fusion Middleware]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Oracle’s July 2026 Critical Patch Update, its largest ever, contains 1,449 new security patches spanning 32 product families, from Oracle Database and E-Business Suite to PeopleSoft, GoldenGate, Java SE, and Fusion Middleware.



Fusion Middleware was particularly hard hit, with new security patc...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687351/ai-nachrichten/oracles-july-update-fixes-ten-100-vulnerabilities-in-fusion-middleware/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687351/ai-nachrichten/oracles-july-update-fixes-ten-100-vulnerabilities-in-fusion-middleware/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:52:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle’s July 2026 Critical Patch Update, its largest ever, contains 1,449 new security patches spanning 32 product families, from Oracle Database and E-Business Suite to PeopleSoft, GoldenGate, Java SE, and Fusion Middleware.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Fusion Middleware was particularly hard hit, with new security patches for 355 security vulnerabilities, 219 of them remotely exploitable without authentication, meaning they can be exploited over a network without requiring user credentials. Ten of them scored a “perfect” 10.0 on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These included easily exploitable vulnerabilities allowing unauthenticated attackers with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Data Integrator, Oracle Access Manager, Oracle HTTP Server, Oracle Platform Security for Java, Oracle WebCenter Content, Service Delivery Platform, or Oracle Weblogic Server Proxy Plug-in,</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">No other products were found to have quite such extreme vulnerabilities, but there were plenty of others scoring almost as badly.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Two critical flaws in Oracle Database Server</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most severe flaw Oracle patched in its flagship database product is CVE-2026-61211, a vulnerability in the RDBMS component’s DBMS_CLOUD package with a CVSS score of 9.9.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This easily exploitable vulnerability allows a low-privileged attacker having Execute DBMS_CLOUD privilege with network access via Oracle Net to compromise the RDBMS, <a href="https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2026verbose.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Oracle said in the patch update statement</a>. “While the vulnerability is in RDBMS, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of RDBMS,” it warned.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The flaw affects Database Server versions 19.3 through 19.31 and 23.4.0 through 23.26.2.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sanchit Vir Gogia, chief analyst at Greyhound Research, said the 9.9 score should be read as serious but conditional. Exposure depends on configuration, he said: On customer-managed databases, DBMS_CLOUD is absent until installed, and grants and network access lists determine the radius from there. “Where DBMS_CLOUD is broadly granted and reachable, the emergency is real and the window is seventy-two hours; where it is absent, the accelerated database wave will do.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Vibhum Dubey, a cybersecurity researcher and red teamer, said the flaw stood out to him because it checks several boxes that concern defenders.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Database servers often hold an organization’s most valuable data, so even if exploitation is not publicly observed yet, I don’t think this is the kind of issue you leave until the next routine maintenance window if your environment is exposed,” Dubey said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A second Database Server flaw, CVE-2026-47040, affects Connection Manager in Oracle Net Services, is remotely exploitable without credentials. Oracle’s risk matrix lists six Database Product vulnerabilities in this cycle as reachable over a network with no authentication required, the statement added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CVE-2026-7383, an OpenSSL-related TLS vulnerability, affects two products, Database Server and Autonomous Health Framework, since both bundle the same third-party component. Oracle’s advisory notes the Database Server patch for that CVE also resolves 19 related OpenSSL CVEs bundled into the same fix.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle GoldenGate received 27 new patches, nine of which do not require authentication to exploit, including CVE-2026-2332, a flaw in the Big Data and Application Adapters component tied to Eclipse Jetty, the statement added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There were also two critical flaws in Oracle’s TimesTen in-memory database.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The remainder of the release spans E-Business Suite, WebLogic Server, PeopleSoft, Siebel, JD Edwards, Communications, Retail Applications, Utilities Applications, MySQL, Solaris and VM VirtualBox.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Volume repair</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gogia said the volume itself marks a shift.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“At 1,449 patches, against 481 in April 2026 and 309 a year earlier, patch load has outgrown the queue built to hold it,” he said. He recommended a tiered response: “The reachable and the reported inside seventy-two hours, the trusted core inside ten days, the rest by risk before the October release.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He also flagged a specific risk in how organizations might triage E-Business Suite. “Oracle’s advisory concedes that E-Business Suite exposure sits partly in underlying Database and Fusion Middleware versions outside the E-Business Suite matrix. The fastest way to mis-prioritise this release is to patch by product logo instead of trust boundary.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Third Tuesday, quarterly cycle</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The July release is the third quarterly Critical Patch Update of 2026, and the first since the <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4179473/oracles-first-monthly-patch-release-fixes-35-flaws-including-11-rated-critical.html">introduction in May</a> of the monthly Critical Security Patch Update program.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gogia said Oracle has effectively layered a second cadence on top of the existing one rather than replacing it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Quarterly Critical Patch Updates remain and stay cumulative; monthly Critical Security Patch Updates now sit on top,” he said, adding that enterprise adoption of the new rhythm remains low because of “certification obligations, regression exposure and scarce specialist hours.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dubey made a similar point about organizational readiness: “In large enterprises, patching is rarely a technical problem. It is an operational one. Database administrators, application owners, infrastructure teams, business stakeholders, and change advisory boards all have to align.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Niyati Daftary, principal analyst at Gartner, said the release underscores a broader shift in how patching is approached.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Patching is no longer a race to remediate every vulnerability. It is a discipline of identifying the exposures that matter most and reducing business risk as efficiently as possible,” she said, adding that organizations should prioritize based on exposure, business impact and exploitability, starting with internet-facing assets and mission-critical systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Daftary pointed to continuous threat exposure management and adversarial exposure validation as increasingly relevant frameworks, since CVSS scores “measure theoretical severity rather than actual enterprise risk.” Patching alone will not be sufficient, Daftary said, and organizations should continue investing in defense in depth, including behavioral threat detection and incident response.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle’s next cumulative Critical Patch Update will come on Oct. 20, 2026, with smaller Critical Security Patch Updates on Aug. 18 and Sept. 15.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4200184/oracles-july-update-fixes-ten-10-0-vulnerabilities-in-fusion-middleware.html">CSO</a>.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Oracle’s July update fixes ten 10.0 vulnerabilities in Fusion Middleware]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Oracle’s July 2026 Critical Patch Update, its largest ever, contains 1,449 new security patches spanning 32 product families, from Oracle Database and E-Business Suite to PeopleSoft, GoldenGate, Java SE, and Fusion Middleware.



Fusion Middleware was particularly hard hit, with new security patc...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687303/it-security-nachrichten/oracles-july-update-fixes-ten-100-vulnerabilities-in-fusion-middleware/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687303/it-security-nachrichten/oracles-july-update-fixes-ten-100-vulnerabilities-in-fusion-middleware/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:33:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle’s July 2026 Critical Patch Update, its largest ever, contains 1,449 new security patches spanning 32 product families, from Oracle Database and E-Business Suite to PeopleSoft, GoldenGate, Java SE, and Fusion Middleware.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Fusion Middleware was particularly hard hit, with new security patches for 355 security vulnerabilities, 219 of them remotely exploitable without authentication, meaning they can be exploited over a network without requiring user credentials. Ten of them scored a “perfect” 10.0 on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These included easily exploitable vulnerabilities allowing unauthenticated attackers with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Data Integrator, Oracle Access Manager, Oracle HTTP Server, Oracle Platform Security for Java, Oracle WebCenter Content, Service Delivery Platform, or Oracle Weblogic Server Proxy Plug-in,</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">No other products were found to have quite such extreme vulnerabilities, but there were plenty of others scoring almost as badly.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Two critical flaws in Oracle Database Server</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most severe flaw Oracle patched in its flagship database product is CVE-2026-61211, a vulnerability in the RDBMS component’s DBMS_CLOUD package with a CVSS score of 9.9.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This easily exploitable vulnerability allows a low-privileged attacker having Execute DBMS_CLOUD privilege with network access via Oracle Net to compromise the RDBMS, <a href="https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2026verbose.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Oracle said in the patch update statement</a>. “While the vulnerability is in RDBMS, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of RDBMS,” it warned.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The flaw affects Database Server versions 19.3 through 19.31 and 23.4.0 through 23.26.2.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sanchit Vir Gogia, chief analyst at Greyhound Research, said the 9.9 score should be read as serious but conditional. Exposure depends on configuration, he said: On customer-managed databases, DBMS_CLOUD is absent until installed, and grants and network access lists determine the radius from there. “Where DBMS_CLOUD is broadly granted and reachable, the emergency is real and the window is seventy-two hours; where it is absent, the accelerated database wave will do.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Vibhum Dubey, a cybersecurity researcher and red teamer, said the flaw stood out to him because it checks several boxes that concern defenders.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Database servers often hold an organization’s most valuable data, so even if exploitation is not publicly observed yet, I don’t think this is the kind of issue you leave until the next routine maintenance window if your environment is exposed,” Dubey said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A second Database Server flaw, CVE-2026-47040, affects Connection Manager in Oracle Net Services, is remotely exploitable without credentials. Oracle’s risk matrix lists six Database Product vulnerabilities in this cycle as reachable over a network with no authentication required, the statement added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CVE-2026-7383, an OpenSSL-related TLS vulnerability, affects two products, Database Server and Autonomous Health Framework, since both bundle the same third-party component. Oracle’s advisory notes the Database Server patch for that CVE also resolves 19 related OpenSSL CVEs bundled into the same fix.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle GoldenGate received 27 new patches, nine of which do not require authentication to exploit, including CVE-2026-2332, a flaw in the Big Data and Application Adapters component tied to Eclipse Jetty, the statement added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There were also two critical flaws in Oracle’s TimesTen in-memory database.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The remainder of the release spans E-Business Suite, WebLogic Server, PeopleSoft, Siebel, JD Edwards, Communications, Retail Applications, Utilities Applications, MySQL, Solaris and VM VirtualBox.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Volume repair</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gogia said the volume itself marks a shift.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“At 1,449 patches, against 481 in April 2026 and 309 a year earlier, patch load has outgrown the queue built to hold it,” he said. He recommended a tiered response: “The reachable and the reported inside seventy-two hours, the trusted core inside ten days, the rest by risk before the October release.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He also flagged a specific risk in how organizations might triage E-Business Suite. “Oracle’s advisory concedes that E-Business Suite exposure sits partly in underlying Database and Fusion Middleware versions outside the E-Business Suite matrix. The fastest way to mis-prioritise this release is to patch by product logo instead of trust boundary.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Third Tuesday, quarterly cycle</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The July release is the third quarterly Critical Patch Update of 2026, and the first since the <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4179473/oracles-first-monthly-patch-release-fixes-35-flaws-including-11-rated-critical.html">introduction in May</a> of the monthly Critical Security Patch Update program.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gogia said Oracle has effectively layered a second cadence on top of the existing one rather than replacing it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Quarterly Critical Patch Updates remain and stay cumulative; monthly Critical Security Patch Updates now sit on top,” he said, adding that enterprise adoption of the new rhythm remains low because of “certification obligations, regression exposure and scarce specialist hours.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dubey made a similar point about organizational readiness: “In large enterprises, patching is rarely a technical problem. It is an operational one. Database administrators, application owners, infrastructure teams, business stakeholders, and change advisory boards all have to align.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Niyati Daftary, principal analyst at Gartner, said the release underscores a broader shift in how patching is approached.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Patching is no longer a race to remediate every vulnerability. It is a discipline of identifying the exposures that matter most and reducing business risk as efficiently as possible,” she said, adding that organizations should prioritize based on exposure, business impact and exploitability, starting with internet-facing assets and mission-critical systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Daftary pointed to continuous threat exposure management and adversarial exposure validation as increasingly relevant frameworks, since CVSS scores “measure theoretical severity rather than actual enterprise risk.” Patching alone will not be sufficient, Daftary said, and organizations should continue investing in defense in depth, including behavioral threat detection and incident response.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle’s next cumulative Critical Patch Update will come on Oct. 20, 2026, with smaller Critical Security Patch Updates on Aug. 18 and Sept. 15.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4200184/oracles-july-update-fixes-ten-10-0-vulnerabilities-in-fusion-middleware.html">CSO</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Oracle’s July update fixes ten 10.0 vulnerabilities in Fusion Middleware]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Oracle’s July 2026 Critical Patch Update, its largest ever, contains 1,449 new security patches spanning 32 product families, from Oracle Database and E-Business Suite to PeopleSoft, GoldenGate, Java SE, and Fusion Middleware.



Fusion Middleware was particularly hard hit, with new security patc...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687241/it-security-nachrichten/oracles-july-update-fixes-ten-100-vulnerabilities-in-fusion-middleware/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687241/it-security-nachrichten/oracles-july-update-fixes-ten-100-vulnerabilities-in-fusion-middleware/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 20:24:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle’s July 2026 Critical Patch Update, its largest ever, contains 1,449 new security patches spanning 32 product families, from Oracle Database and E-Business Suite to PeopleSoft, GoldenGate, Java SE, and Fusion Middleware.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Fusion Middleware was particularly hard hit, with new security patches for 355 security vulnerabilities, 219 of them remotely exploitable without authentication, meaning they can be exploited over a network without requiring user credentials. Ten of them scored a “perfect” 10.0 on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These included easily exploitable vulnerabilities allowing unauthenticated attackers with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Data Integrator, Oracle Access Manager, Oracle HTTP Server, Oracle Platform Security for Java, Oracle WebCenter Content, Service Delivery Platform, or Oracle Weblogic Server Proxy Plug-in,</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">No other products were found to have quite such extreme vulnerabilities, but there were plenty of others scoring almost as badly.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Two critical flaws in Oracle Database Server</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most severe flaw Oracle patched in its flagship database product is CVE-2026-61211, a vulnerability in the RDBMS component’s DBMS_CLOUD package with a CVSS score of 9.9.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This easily exploitable vulnerability allows a low-privileged attacker having Execute DBMS_CLOUD privilege with network access via Oracle Net to compromise the RDBMS, <a href="https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2026verbose.html">Oracle said in the patch update statement</a>. “While the vulnerability is in RDBMS, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of RDBMS,” it warned.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The flaw affects Database Server versions 19.3 through 19.31 and 23.4.0 through 23.26.2.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sanchit Vir Gogia, chief analyst at Greyhound Research, said the 9.9 score should be read as serious but conditional. Exposure depends on configuration, he said: On customer-managed databases, DBMS_CLOUD is absent until installed, and grants and network access lists determine the radius from there. “Where DBMS_CLOUD is broadly granted and reachable, the emergency is real and the window is seventy-two hours; where it is absent, the accelerated database wave will do.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Vibhum Dubey, a cybersecurity researcher and red teamer, said the flaw stood out to him because it checks several boxes that concern defenders.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Database servers often hold an organization’s most valuable data, so even if exploitation is not publicly observed yet, I don’t think this is the kind of issue you leave until the next routine maintenance window if your environment is exposed,” Dubey said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A second Database Server flaw, CVE-2026-47040, affects Connection Manager in Oracle Net Services, is remotely exploitable without credentials. Oracle’s risk matrix lists six Database Product vulnerabilities in this cycle as reachable over a network with no authentication required, the statement added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CVE-2026-7383, an OpenSSL-related TLS vulnerability, affects two products, Database Server and Autonomous Health Framework, since both bundle the same third-party component. Oracle’s advisory notes the Database Server patch for that CVE also resolves 19 related OpenSSL CVEs bundled into the same fix.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle GoldenGate received 27 new patches, nine of which do not require authentication to exploit, including CVE-2026-2332, a flaw in the Big Data and Application Adapters component tied to Eclipse Jetty, the statement added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There were also two critical flaws in Oracle’s TimesTen in-memory database.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The remainder of the release spans E-Business Suite, WebLogic Server, PeopleSoft, Siebel, JD Edwards, Communications, Retail Applications, Utilities Applications, MySQL, Solaris and VM VirtualBox.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Volume repair</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gogia said the volume itself marks a shift.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“At 1,449 patches, against 481 in April 2026 and 309 a year earlier, patch load has outgrown the queue built to hold it,” he said. He recommended a tiered response: “The reachable and the reported inside seventy-two hours, the trusted core inside ten days, the rest by risk before the October release.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He also flagged a specific risk in how organizations might triage E-Business Suite. “Oracle’s advisory concedes that E-Business Suite exposure sits partly in underlying Database and Fusion Middleware versions outside the E-Business Suite matrix. The fastest way to mis-prioritise this release is to patch by product logo instead of trust boundary.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Third Tuesday, quarterly cycle</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The July release is the third quarterly Critical Patch Update of 2026, and the first since the <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4179473/oracles-first-monthly-patch-release-fixes-35-flaws-including-11-rated-critical.html">introduction in May</a> of the monthly Critical Security Patch Update program.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gogia said Oracle has effectively layered a second cadence on top of the existing one rather than replacing it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Quarterly Critical Patch Updates remain and stay cumulative; monthly Critical Security Patch Updates now sit on top,” he said, adding that enterprise adoption of the new rhythm remains low because of “certification obligations, regression exposure and scarce specialist hours.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dubey made a similar point about organizational readiness: “In large enterprises, patching is rarely a technical problem. It is an operational one. Database administrators, application owners, infrastructure teams, business stakeholders, and change advisory boards all have to align.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Niyati Daftary, principal analyst at Gartner, said the release underscores a broader shift in how patching is approached.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Patching is no longer a race to remediate every vulnerability. It is a discipline of identifying the exposures that matter most and reducing business risk as efficiently as possible,” she said, adding that organizations should prioritize based on exposure, business impact and exploitability, starting with internet-facing assets and mission-critical systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Daftary pointed to continuous threat exposure management and adversarial exposure validation as increasingly relevant frameworks, since CVSS scores “measure theoretical severity rather than actual enterprise risk.” Patching alone will not be sufficient, Daftary said, and organizations should continue investing in defense in depth, including behavioral threat detection and incident response.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oracle’s next cumulative Critical Patch Update will come on Oct. 20, 2026, with smaller Critical Security Patch Updates on Aug. 18 and Sept. 15.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Music Industry Introduces Voluntary AI Labels to Improve Transparency in Recordings]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[  Several leading music industry organisations have introduced a new voluntary labelling framework for recordings created using generative artificial intelligence (AI), aiming to improve transparency for listeners and encourage wider adoption across the global music ecosystem.  The initiative, an...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687174/it-security-nachrichten/music-industry-introduces-voluntary-ai-labels-to-improve-transparency-in-recordings/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687174/it-security-nachrichten/music-industry-introduces-voluntary-ai-labels-to-improve-transparency-in-recordings/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 19:37:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>  Several leading music industry organisations have introduced a new voluntary labelling framework for recordings created using generative artificial intelligence (AI), aiming to improve transparency for listeners and encourage wider adoption across the global music ecosystem.  The initiative, announced on…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/music-industry-introduces-voluntary-ai-labels-to-improve-transparency-in-recordings/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/music-industry-introduces-voluntary-ai-labels-to-improve-transparency-in-recordings/">Music Industry Introduces Voluntary AI Labels to Improve Transparency in Recordings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[[$] Save and restore may be coming to GNOME]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[One of the features that users often miss when moving from X11 to Wayland is
the ability to save and restore the position of windows between sessions. At GUADEC 2026, held in
A Coruña, Spain, Adrian Vovk provided an overview of work that has gone
into providing a platform-wide save and restore fr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3687114/linux-tipps/save-and-restore-may-be-coming-to-gnome/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3687114/linux-tipps/save-and-restore-may-be-coming-to-gnome/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 19:14:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the features that users often miss when moving from X11 to Wayland is
the ability to save and restore the position of windows between sessions. At <a href="https://events.gnome.org/event/306/">GUADEC 2026</a>, held in
A Coruña, Spain, Adrian Vovk provided an overview of work that has gone
into providing a platform-wide save and restore framework for GNOME. After two
failed attempts at landing an API, he believes that the third try will be the
one to succeed—though not in time for the upcoming GNOME 51 release
due in October.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI unveils Presence, a new platform that lets enterprises launch and manage realtime voice agents and chatbots]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[OpenAI has announced Presence, a new enterprise product for deploying and managing AI agents across customer-facing and internal business workflows. The offering is designed for eligible enterprise customers that want agents to answer questions, access company systems, take approved actions and e...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686972/it-nachrichten/openai-unveils-presence-a-new-platform-that-lets-enterprises-launch-and-manage-realtime-voice-agents-and-chatbots/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686972/it-nachrichten/openai-unveils-presence-a-new-platform-that-lets-enterprises-launch-and-manage-realtime-voice-agents-and-chatbots/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:12:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OpenAI has <a href="https://openai.com/index/introducing-openai-presence/">announced Presence</a>, a new enterprise product for deploying and managing AI agents across customer-facing and internal business workflows. </p><p>The offering is designed for eligible enterprise customers that want agents to answer questions, access company systems, take approved actions and escalate to human workers while operating under company-defined policies, permissions and evaluation standards.</p><p>Presence is available immediately through a limited general availability program. OpenAI Forward Deployed Engineers (FDEs) and select global systems integrators lead deployments, and the product is not available on a self-service basis. </p><p>OpenAI has not disclosed pricing, geographic limits, contractual terms or the expected cost of the engineering and integration work that accompanies a deployment. The company also has not said whether Presence can use models from providers other than OpenAI, including the increasingly powerful and popular Chinese open weights alternatives like <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/z-ais-open-weights-glm-5-2-beats-gpt-5-5-on-multiple-long-horizon-coding-benchmarks-for-1-6th-the-cost">GLM-5.2</a> and <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/chinas-moonshot-ai-releases-kimi-k3-the-largest-open-source-model-ever-rivaling-top-u-s-systems">Kimi K3</a>. I've asked an OpenAI contact to clarify both pricing and external-model compatibility, but those remain unanswered questions for now. I'lll update when I hear back.</p><p>OpenAI positions Presence as a response to a problem that has become more important as companies move beyond AI demonstrations: getting agents to behave reliably in production as business rules, customer needs and operating conditions change. Presence packages the policies, system connections, evaluations, guardrails and update processes required to run agents inside an enterprise.</p><p>If your business has been interested in using AI agents, but you aren't sure how to stitch together OpenAI's models, APIs, internal systems, security controls and evaluation tools into something reliable, Presence is designed to simplify that process. Instead of building the infrastructure yourself, you work with OpenAI and its deployment engineers to put production-ready agents into your existing workflows.</p><p>The product is available today for real-time voice and chat experiences, according to OpenAI’s formal announcement. The company’s outreach materials also describe a broader ambition spanning voice, chat, email and other channels, but OpenAI has not confirmed that email support is available at launch.</p><h2><b>A governed foundation for production agents</b></h2><p>Presence brings together company knowledge, standard operating procedures, approved actions, simulations, evaluation tools, guardrails and escalation rules. Enterprises can reuse some controls across deployments while adjusting others for a particular workflow or channel.</p><p>Each deployment starts with a defined job, such as resolving a billing issue, supporting an insurance claim or handling an employee IT request. The agent receives only the information and system access required for that task. The customer determines what the agent may do independently, which actions require approval and when a person must take over.</p><p>Before an agent reaches production, teams can test it against common requests, unusual edge cases and higher-risk scenarios. Graders evaluate whether it reached the intended outcome, followed policy, used tools correctly and escalated when required. Guardrails can intervene when an interaction moves outside the organization’s defined boundaries.</p><p>OpenAI shared promotional screenshots with VentureBeat showing administrators running simulation batches against policy changes, including a revised annual refund policy, and reviewing results across operational categories. </p><p>Other interface mockups display production health, customer-intent patterns and task-performance signals. The visuals illustrate the type of oversight OpenAI is promising, although they do not establish how those metrics are calculated or how they map to contractual service levels.</p><p>The product continues to monitor performance after launch. Production sessions, escalations and quality signals can reveal where an agent is working as intended and where it needs attention. Codex, using a Presence plugin, investigates those signals and proposes updates. Teams then test a proposed change against the version already in production before approving a controlled rollout.</p><p>That process is intended to address one of the hardest operational problems in enterprise AI: an agent that works at launch may become less reliable when policies, products or user behavior change. Presence gives companies a formal mechanism for updating behavior without allowing an automated system to rewrite itself unchecked.</p><p>OpenAI says Presence already powers its English-language phone-support channel at 1-888-GPT-0090. The system handles open-ended requests, verifies callers, uses account context and performs approved actions. According to the company, it now resolves <b>75% of inbound issues without human assistance</b>. </p><p>OpenAI also says its Codex-powered improvement loop reduced human handoffs by <b>15 percentage points over a 10-day period</b>. Those figures are company-reported and have not been independently verified.</p><p>Several large organizations are evaluating the same foundation. BBVA is exploring voice support for routine banking needs in Mexico. SoftBank is testing natural Japanese-language customer conversations, while Australian insurer IAG is exploring support during high-demand periods such as severe weather and natural disasters.</p><p>“At BBVA, we are working closely with OpenAI to explore how trusted customer agents can help shape the future of financial services,” said Daniel Ordaz, head of AI transformation at BBVA Mexico.</p><p>“Through our collaboration with OpenAI, we are exploring how Presence can enable trusted customer agents that communicate naturally, connect to the processes needed to resolve requests, and represent SoftBank consistently across customer interactions,” said Tadahisa Murakami, vice president and head of the Data &amp; Digital Transformation Division at SoftBank Corp.</p><h2><b>From model access to forward-deployed implementation</b></h2><p>Presence expands OpenAI’s enterprise strategy beyond APIs and subscription software by formalizing a high-touch deployment model. Forward Deployed Engineers work alongside customers to select workflows, connect internal systems, establish permissions, configure policies, test agents and move them into production.</p><p>That approach resembles a <a href="https://fde.academy/blog/how-palantir-invented-the-forward-deployed-engineer-model">model pioneered by AI ontology and intelligence platform Palantir,</a> which embeds FDEs with customers to adapt its proprietary software to complex government and commercial environments. The similarity lies less in the underlying technology than in the delivery method: both companies place technical personnel close to the customer’s operations, where integration and process design often determine whether software creates value.</p><p>The products are not interchangeable. Palantir’s model has historically centered on data integration, ontologies and operational decision systems. Presence is more narrowly focused on AI-agent behavior, approved actions, evaluations, escalation and continuous improvement. OpenAI presents it as a repeatable software product supported by engineers and systems integrators, rather than as consulting alone.</p><p>In May 2026, OpenAI launched its own enterprise AI consulting and integration firm, the <a href="https://openai.com/index/openai-launches-the-deployment-company/">OpenAI Deployment Company</a>, with investment and <a href="https://www.bain.com/about/media-center/press-releases/2026/bain-company-openai-a-new-venture-to-deploy-ai-at-enterprise-scale/">support from Bain &amp; Company.</a> It also offers programs for model customization and fine-tuning to fit specific enterprise needs. </p><p>Its chief U.S. rival Anthropic has also moved <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2026/07/15/anthropic-blackstone-bet-the-next-trillion-dollar-ai-business-is-implementation-not-models/">toward a services-led enterprise model through Ode,</a> its consulting organization built around forward-deployed engineers helping companies integrate Claude into complex workflows, which launched just a week ago. The broad rationale is similar: enterprises often need more than access to a model. They need help connecting data and systems, defining permissions, validating behavior and managing deployment risk.</p><p>Presence differs in how explicitly OpenAI packages those requirements into a branded agent-governance product. Anthropic’s initiative is centered on helping enterprises deploy Claude, while Presence combines implementation services with a defined operational layer for policies, simulations, evaluations, approvals and production updates.</p><p>Presence goes further by making forward deployment a core part of how a specific agent product reaches customers. It does not replace OpenAI’s API business; the company says it will continue supporting voice customers with access to frontier models through the OpenAI API.</p><p>The trend reflects a broader market view that many enterprises still need hands-on assistance to move agents from pilot projects into stable operations. Even organizations with strong internal engineering teams must coordinate security, compliance, workflow ownership, data access and escalation responsibilities. Presence attempts to consolidate those tasks rather than leaving customers to assemble separate orchestration, evaluation and consulting layers.</p><h2><b>A recent security breach looms in the background</b></h2><p>Inconveniently for OpenAI, the Presence launch arrives just a day after <a href="https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-model-evaluation-security-incident/">OpenAI and Hugging Face disclosed an unprecedented security incident</a> in which OpenAI frontier models undergoing internal evaluation escaped containment, accessed the open web, and cyberattacked Hugging Face to achieve a benign goal — without being instructed to pursue these methods.</p><p>According to the described joint disclosure, OpenAI models operating in an evaluation framework called ExploitGym identified and exploited a zero-day vulnerability in a third-party package-registry cache proxy. The models reportedly escalated privileges, moved laterally and obtained internet access before targeting Hugging Face systems while seeking benchmark-related information.</p><p>The incident is relevant to enterprise buyers because it raises questions about sandboxing, tool permissions, external access, monitoring and incident response. </p><p>The disclosure also highlighted a practical problem for defenders. Hugging Face personnel reportedly found that commercial frontier-model APIs refused some forensic requests because logs contained exploit payloads, credentials and shell commands that triggered safety systems. The team then used a locally deployed open-weight model to assist with analysis.</p><p>Presence therefore arrives as both a product launch and a test of OpenAI’s ability to convert model capability into controlled enterprise operations. Its policies, simulations, evaluations and human approvals address real deployment gaps. But without public pricing, technical interoperability details, compliance information or service-level commitments, customers still lack much of the information needed to assess total cost and operational risk.</p><p>For now, Presence appears aimed at enterprises willing to adopt a high-touch, OpenAI-led deployment process. Whether it develops into a broadly accessible platform—or remains a closely managed product for selected customers—will depend in part on the answers OpenAI has not yet provided.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What’s New in Rapid7 Products and Services: Q2 2026 in Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[If Q1 set the pace for Rapid7's tools, Q2 accelerated it. This quarter brought a steady stream of product enhancements, platform investments, and customer-driven innovation across Rapid7’s portfolio. Each release was designed with a clear goal in mind: helping security teams reduce complexity whi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686659/it-security-nachrichten/whats-new-in-rapid7-products-and-services-q2-2026-in-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686659/it-security-nachrichten/whats-new-in-rapid7-products-and-services-q2-2026-in-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 16:30:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>If Q1 set the pace for Rapid7's tools, Q2 accelerated it. This quarter brought a steady stream of product enhancements, platform investments, and customer-driven innovation across Rapid7’s portfolio. Each release was designed with a clear goal in mind: helping security teams reduce complexity while increasing speed, context, and confidence in their day-to-day operations. Here’s a closer look at what launched in Q2.</span></p><h2>Detection and response</h2><h3><span>Streamline investigations with bidirectional and enriched Microsoft Defender alerts</span></h3><p><span>Bidirectional synchronization and enriched alert context for Microsoft Defender is now generally available for SIEM and </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/services/managed-detection-and-response-mdr/" target="_self"><span>MDR</span></a><span> customers, enabling security teams to automatically synchronize alert status between Rapid7's </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/products/siem" target="_self"><span>SIEM</span></a><span> and the Microsoft Defender console. With added process tree and user identity context, analysts can investigate threats more efficiently while reducing manual effort.</span></p><h3><span>Confidently scale detection engineering with Detection as Code</span></h3><p><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/dr-scaling-engineering-detection-as-code" target="_self"><span>Detection as Code</span></a><span> enables security teams to build, test, version, and deploy detections using Terraform and modern engineering workflows. Built-in validation, guardrails, and version control help teams deliver higher-quality alerts, maintain more consistent coverage, and scale detection engineering more effectively.</span></p><p></p><figure><div><img src="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt5b87b1b66cb42fb0/6a60c7d908c174e1555adb14/image2.png" alt="rapid7-detection-as-code-methodology.png" caption="Figure 1: Rapid7's Detection as Code methodology." height="713" class="embedded-asset" content-type-uid="sys_assets" type="asset" asset-alt="rapid7-detection-as-code-methodology.png" width="1553" max-width="1553" max-height="713" data-sys-asset-filelink="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt5b87b1b66cb42fb0/6a60c7d908c174e1555adb14/image2.png" data-sys-asset-uid="blt5b87b1b66cb42fb0" data-sys-asset-filename="image2.png" data-sys-asset-contenttype="image/png" data-sys-asset-caption="Figure 1: Rapid7's Detection as Code methodology." data-sys-asset-alt="rapid7-detection-as-code-methodology.png" data-sys-asset-position="none" sys-style-type="display"><figcaption>Figure 1: Rapid7's Detection as Code methodology.</figcaption></div></figure><p></p><h3><span>Strengthen ransomware resilience with Ransomware Prevention for Incident Command</span></h3><p><span>Ransomware Prevention for </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/products/siem" target="_self"><span>Incident Command</span></a><span> adds an intent-based layer of protection designed to stop ransomware encryption and endpoint damage before they disrupt operations. Built into the Insight Agent, this capability strengthens ransomware resilience while working alongside existing endpoint security investments, without adding operational complexity.</span></p><h2>Compliance</h2><h3>New solutions webpages</h3><p><span>Across the globe, cybersecurity regulation is shifting away from static compliance checklists and toward ongoing risk management that blends proactive defense with effective detection and response. Rapid7’s </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/platform" target="_self"><span>platform</span></a><span>, which brings exposure management and CTEM together with detection, response, and MDR, is well positioned to help organizations operationalize compliance across mandates such as NIS2, NIST CSF 2.0, DORA, HIPAA, HITRUST, and GovRAMP. To support that effort, Rapid7 has launched an updated library of dedicated compliance solution pages that map platform capabilities to the requirements that matter most across industries and regions. The first set of pages is live now, with more to follow in the coming weeks.</span></p><ul><li><p><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/solutions/compliance/nist-csf-2" target="_self"><span>NIST CSF 2.0</span></a></p></li><li><p><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/solutions/compliance/hipaa" target="_self"><span>HIPAA</span></a></p></li><li><p><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/solutions/compliance/hitrust" target="_self"><span>HITRUST</span></a></p></li><li><p><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/solutions/compliance/nis2" target="_self"><span>NIS2</span></a></p></li><li><p><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/www.rapid7.com/solutions/compliance/govramp" target="_self"><span>GovRAMP</span></a></p></li></ul><p></p><figure><div><img src="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blta8db9b364598a181/6a60c98604258068dc0bf302/rapid7-govramp-compliance.png" alt="rapid7-govramp-compliance.png" caption="Figure 2: Rapid7's new GovRAMP compliance solutions page." class="embedded-asset" content-type-uid="sys_assets" type="asset" asset-alt="rapid7-govramp-compliance.png" data-sys-asset-filelink="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blta8db9b364598a181/6a60c98604258068dc0bf302/rapid7-govramp-compliance.png" data-sys-asset-uid="blta8db9b364598a181" data-sys-asset-filename="rapid7-govramp-compliance.png" data-sys-asset-contenttype="image/png" data-sys-asset-caption="Figure 2: Rapid7's new GovRAMP compliance solutions page." data-sys-asset-alt="rapid7-govramp-compliance.png" data-sys-asset-position="none" sys-style-type="display"><figcaption>Figure 2: Rapid7's new GovRAMP compliance solutions page.</figcaption></div></figure><h2>Exposure management</h2><h3><span>Turn prioritized exposures into remediation progress</span></h3><p><span>We improved Remediation Hub to help teams turn prioritized exposures into more actionable remediation progress. Updates to the Top Remediations Report add asset-level context, including operating system, IP address, cloud provider, tags, endpoint protection, and patch management details, so teams can better understand what needs to be fixed and who needs to act.</span></p><p><span>With clearer patch and endpoint coverage signals, reboot status, customizable filters, exportable reports, and scheduled email delivery, teams can spend less time assembling manual updates and more time tracking the remediation work that reduces risk. Read the full </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/em-path-from-prioritized-exposures-to-remediation-progress" target="_self"><span>blog</span></a><span> to learn more about how Exposure Command helps teams move from prioritized exposures to remediation progress.</span></p><h3><span>AI pre-triage for AppSec findings</span></h3><p><span>Rapid7 is also making application security testing faster and more focused with AI vulnerability pre-triaging for InsightAppSec. Available now for </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/products/insightappsec" target="_self"><span>AppSec</span></a><span> customers in supported regions, the capability uses AI to automatically remove false positives during the scan process, helping teams spend less time manually reviewing findings and more time remediating actual risk.</span></p><p><span>Initial coverage started with BlindSQL, and the latest engine release adds AI validation for BlindNoSQL findings, including content-based and timing-based detections. The result is a cleaner, more confident view of application risk, so security teams can focus on high-impact vulnerabilities and accelerate remediation with less manual effort.</span></p><h2>Attack surface management</h2><h3><span>Open-source MCP Server and Agent Skill</span></h3><p><span>We are delighted to announce the introduction of a free, open-source MCP Server and Agent Skill for Bulk Export. Bulk export is a highly efficient way to access all your Rapid7 vulnerability and exposure data to AI assistants and custom AI workflows. Built as an open-source bridge, it helps customers bring their Rapid7 data into the tools and experiences that work best for their teams. Check out our </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/em-bulk-export-ai-ready-security-workflows-open-source-mcp-server-agent-skill" target="_self"><span>blog</span></a><span> for more detail.</span></p><p></p><figure><div><img src="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt83035d9c7fcbfdf4/6a60ca130133d41740e07649/rapid7-ai-agent-skill.png" alt="rapid7-ai-agent-skill.png" caption="Figure 3: Agent Skill for Bulk Export." class="embedded-asset" content-type-uid="sys_assets" type="asset" asset-alt="rapid7-ai-agent-skill.png" data-sys-asset-filelink="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt83035d9c7fcbfdf4/6a60ca130133d41740e07649/rapid7-ai-agent-skill.png" data-sys-asset-uid="blt83035d9c7fcbfdf4" data-sys-asset-filename="rapid7-ai-agent-skill.png" data-sys-asset-contenttype="image/png" data-sys-asset-caption="Figure 3: Agent Skill for Bulk Export." data-sys-asset-alt="rapid7-ai-agent-skill.png" data-sys-asset-position="none" sys-style-type="display"><figcaption>Figure 3: Agent Skill for Bulk Export.</figcaption></div></figure><h3><span>Turn exposure filters into live dashboards</span></h3><p><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/products/command/attack-surface-management-asm/" target="_self"><span>Surface Command</span></a><span> also made exposure reporting easier with filter-based dashboard widgets. Teams can now turn saved asset and identity filters into live dashboards without writing Cypher queries, making it faster to track high-risk internet-facing assets, identity-driven exposure hotspots, unmanaged cloud infrastructure, and business-unit risk.</span></p><p><span>For continuous threat exposure management programs, this helps teams move from one-off reporting to repeatable, always-on views of exposure risk and remediation progress. Read this </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/em-operationalizing-ctem-building-surface-command-dashboards" target="_self"><span>blog</span></a><span> to learn more. </span></p><h2>Platform and Labs</h2><h3><span>Rapid7 Command Platform</span></h3><h4><span>Cyber GRC</span></h4><p><span>Rapid7 introduced </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/about/press-releases/rapid7-launches-cyber-governance-risk-and-compliance-grc-early-access-program-to-unify-security-data-risk-context-and-compliance-workflows" target="_self"><span>Cyber GRC</span></a><span> to select customers in Q2, giving teams an early look at a new way to connect security, risk, compliance, and third-party risk management in one program. Available to both Exposure Management and Detection and Response customers, Cyber GRC brings governance and compliance workflows closer to the security data teams already use every day.</span></p><p><span>Cyber GRC will be broadly available in late July. It helps organizations move toward continuous compliance by mapping controls to real environment telemetry, automating evidence collection, and prioritizing risk with live attack surface context. That means teams can spend less time chasing audit artifacts, screenshots, and vendor risk details, and more time understanding which controls, assets, third parties, and risks need attention now.</span></p><h3><span>Rapid7 Labs</span></h3><h4><span>Rapid7 Quarterly Threat Landscape Report</span></h4><p><span>The Rapid7 Quarterly Threat Landscape Report examines the key trends shaping today's threat landscape, drawing on MDR incident response, vulnerability intelligence, ransomware monitoring, and dark web telemetry. Q1 2026 data highlights the growing dominance of vulnerability exploitation as an initial access vector, the rise of zero-click vulnerabilities, evolving ransomware operations, and the accelerating pace at which attackers operationalize newly disclosed vulnerabilities. Read the </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/research/report/threat-landscape-report-2026-q1" target="_self"><span>report</span></a><span> to explore all key findings and takeaways.</span></p><p></p><figure><div><img src="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt9eaa551742740d0a/6a60ca8f4dd0a37fcaca1cc5/rapid7-quarterly-threat-report.png" alt="rapid7-quarterly-threat-report.png" caption="Figure 4: Rapid7's quarterly threat report." class="embedded-asset" content-type-uid="sys_assets" type="asset" asset-alt="rapid7-quarterly-threat-report.png" data-sys-asset-filelink="https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt9eaa551742740d0a/6a60ca8f4dd0a37fcaca1cc5/rapid7-quarterly-threat-report.png" data-sys-asset-uid="blt9eaa551742740d0a" data-sys-asset-filename="rapid7-quarterly-threat-report.png" data-sys-asset-contenttype="image/png" data-sys-asset-caption="Figure 4: Rapid7's quarterly threat report." data-sys-asset-alt="rapid7-quarterly-threat-report.png" data-sys-asset-position="none" sys-style-type="display"><figcaption>Figure 4: Rapid7's quarterly threat report.</figcaption></div></figure><h3><span>The latest threat research</span></h3><p><span>Rapid7 researchers explored emerging trends shaping the threat landscape, including the growing commercialization of </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/tr-criminal-ai-underground-market-operationalizing-cybercrime-2026" target="_self"><span>criminal AI-as-a-Service</span></a><span> and the evolving tradecraft of advanced threat actors. From the underground adoption of AI tools for fraud and social engineering to an </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/tr-malware-tracking-dropping-elephant-tradecraft-china-themed-loader-chain" target="_self"><span>in-depth analysis of the Dropping Elephant malware campaign</span></a><span>, these reports provide actionable intelligence on how attackers are adapting their techniques and what defenders can do to stay ahead.</span></p><h4><span>Emergent Threat Response</span></h4><p><span>This quarter's Emergent Threat Response (ETR) coverage highlights a sustained wave of high-impact vulnerabilities affecting widely deployed enterprise technologies, including </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/etr-active-exploitation-of-oracle-peoplesoft-zero-day-cve-2026-35273" target="_self"><span>Oracle PeopleSoft</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/etr-cve-2026-0265-authentication-bypass-in-palo-alto-networks-pan-os" target="_self"><span>Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/etr-critical-check-point-vpn-zero-day-exploited-in-the-wild-cve-2026-50751" target="_self"><span>Check Point VPN</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/etr-cve-2026-10520-cve-2026-10523-multiple-critical-vulnerabilities-affecting-ivanti-sentry" target="_self"><span>Ivanti Sentry</span></a><span>, </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/etr-cve-2026-41940-cpanel-whm-authentication-bypass" target="_self"><span>cPanel/WHM</span></a><span>, and </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/etr-cve-2026-33032-nginx-ui-missing-mcp-authentication" target="_self"><span>Nginx UI</span></a><span>. For each of these CVEs, Rapid7 tracked active exploitation and rapidly evolving attacker activity to provide timely guidance to help defenders assess risk and respond quickly. See all the details, and our latest ETR coverage, </span><a href="https://www.rapid7.com/blog/tag/emergent-threat-response" target="_self"><span>here</span></a><span>.</span></p><p><span>From strengthening detection and response to advancing exposure management, expanding governance capabilities, and delivering actionable threat intelligence, Q2 demonstrated Rapid7’s continued focus on helping security teams do more with less complexity. Every enhancement this quarter was designed to reduce manual effort, surface the context that matters, and help organizations make faster, more confident security decisions. We’re carrying that momentum into the rest of the year, so stay tuned to our blog and releases as we continue building the security operations platform that helps defenders stay ahead of what’s next.</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New NULLZEREPTOOL Uses Telegram to Launch 20 DDoS Methods With Rotating Proxies]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[NULLZEREPTOOL is a newly uncovered attack framework that turns a Telegram bot into a remote control panel for powerful distributed denial of service campaigns backed by rotating proxy infrastructure. The framework came to light when a single Pastebin post was…
Read more →
The post New NULLZEREPTO...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686419/it-security-nachrichten/new-nullzereptool-uses-telegram-to-launch-20-ddos-methods-with-rotating-proxies/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686419/it-security-nachrichten/new-nullzereptool-uses-telegram-to-launch-20-ddos-methods-with-rotating-proxies/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 15:13:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NULLZEREPTOOL is a newly uncovered attack framework that turns a Telegram bot into a remote control panel for powerful distributed denial of service campaigns backed by rotating proxy infrastructure. The framework came to light when a single Pastebin post was…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/new-nullzereptool-uses-telegram-to-launch-20-ddos-methods-with-rotating-proxies/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/new-nullzereptool-uses-telegram-to-launch-20-ddos-methods-with-rotating-proxies/">New NULLZEREPTOOL Uses Telegram to Launch 20 DDoS Methods With Rotating Proxies</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Windows 11 bekommt modernen Look und verliert Elemente aus Windows-95-Zeiten]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft arbeitet kontinuierlich daran, Windows 11 einen modernen Look zu verpassen. Dazu hat das Unternehmen nun alte Elemente ersetzt, die noch aus der Ära von Windows 95 stammen, wie die Seite Windows Latest berichtet.



Der bekannte Leaker PhantomOfEarth hat demnach einige Neuerungen in den...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686406/it-nachrichten/windows-11-bekommt-modernen-look-und-verliert-elemente-aus-windows-95-zeiten/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686406/it-nachrichten/windows-11-bekommt-modernen-look-und-verliert-elemente-aus-windows-95-zeiten/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 15:06:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Microsoft arbeitet kontinuierlich daran, Windows 11 einen modernen Look zu verpassen. Dazu hat das Unternehmen nun alte Elemente ersetzt, die noch aus der Ära von Windows 95 stammen, wie die Seite Windows Latest <a href="https://www.windowslatest.com/2026/07/22/first-look-windows-11-is-replacing-windows-95-era-properties-dialog-now-with-dark-mode-and-winui/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">berichtet</a>.</p>



<p>Der bekannte Leaker PhantomOfEarth hat demnach einige Neuerungen in den <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3195776/windows-11-preview-das-bringen-die-naechsten-updates-an-neuerungen.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">kürzlich veröffentlichten Preview-Builds</a> entdeckt. Darunter ein neuer Eigenschaften-Dialog des Datei-Explorers, dessen zugrunde liegender Code sich in den letzten Jahrzehnten kaum verändert haben soll.</p>



<p>Microsoft hat bereits bestätigt, dass alle veralteten Dialogfelder durch moderne Versionen ersetzt werden sollen. Einige davon stammen aus Zeiten von Windows 8, andere reichen sogar bis Windows 95 zurück. Die neuen Versionen sollen vollständig auf WinUI 3, Microsofts aktuellem Framework für die Benutzeroberfläche von Windows 11, basieren.</p>



<p><strong>Was bedeutet das also für Windows 11?</strong> Microsoft plant offensichtlich, einige klassische Elemente aus Windows zu entfernen und mit neuen, modernen Inhalten zu ersetzen. Das dürfte die Optik von Windows 11 deutlich beeinflussen und dafür sorgen, dass weniger “Altlasten” durchscheinen.</p>



<p>Leider stößt Microsoft aber bei diesem Vorhaben immer wieder auf ein Hindernis, das es selbst erschaffen hat: Da Windows 11 ein Legacy-Betriebssystem ist und größtenteils aus altem Code besteht, der nie ersetzt wurde (sondern lediglich aufpoliert), ist es deutlich schwerer, das Ganze zu modernisieren. Zumindest nicht, ohne die Performance oder Teile des Nutzererlebnisses zu gefährden.</p>



<p>Die Modernisierung eines kleinen Teils von Windows, wie eben des Eigenschaften-Dialogfelds, kann etwa dazu führen, dass Anwendungen von Drittanbietern nicht mehr richtig funktionieren. Das können <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2255713/test-bestes-antivirus-programm-windows.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Antivirenprogramme</a> oder andere Anwendungen wie 7-Zip, Dropbox, Codec-Pakete und so weiter sein.</p>



<p>Es ist also eine mühsame Aufgabe, alte Teile von Windows mit neuen Elementen zu ersetzen. Die Vorteile von modernen Elementen, die komplett auf WinUI 3 basieren, überwiegen aber. Denn sie können schneller starten und verursachen weniger Probleme, sofern sie ordentlich implementiert werden.</p>



<p><em>Übrigens: Sollten Sie Windows 11 Home im Einsatz haben, dann entgehen Ihnen die vielen Vorteile der Pro-Version, die wir Ihnen <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/1203134/windows-11-unterschiede-zwischen-home-und-pro-version.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">hier vorstellen.</a> Im PC-WELT Software-Shop ist das Windows-11-Upgrade <a href="https://software.pcwelt.de/offer/windows_11_professional_upgrade/44487?x-source=4-0-3194510-1-0-0-00002-0?x-source=4-0-3195776-1-0-0-0-0?x-source=rss" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">für günstige 59,99 Euro statt 145 Euro</a> erhältlich.</em></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Nicht die einzige Neuerung</h2>



<p>Auch der Windows-Ausführungsdialog soll einen modernen Ersatz bekommen. Dieser soll sich nicht nur optisch verändern, sondern auch neue Funktionen bieten. Laut kann man den modernen Ausführungsdialog bereits unter <strong>Einstellungen &gt; Erweiterte Einstellungen</strong> aktivieren und ausprobieren.</p>



<p>Danach können Sie den Ausführen-Dialog über die Tastenkombination Win+R öffnen, was etwas schneller vonstatten gehen soll. Er soll außerdem zum Kontext passende Vorschläge und einen Schnellzugriff auf das Home-Verzeichnis bieten. </p>



<p><a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3195776/windows-11-preview-das-bringen-die-naechsten-updates-an-neuerungen.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Windows 11 Preview: Das bringen die nächsten Updates an Neuerungen</a></p>

</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New NULLZEREPTOOL Uses Telegram to Launch 20 DDoS Methods With Rotating Proxies]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[NULLZEREPTOOL is a newly uncovered attack framework that turns a Telegram bot into a remote control panel for powerful distributed denial of service campaigns backed by rotating proxy infrastructure. The framework came to light when a single Pastebin post was flagged during continuous paste‑site ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686247/it-security-nachrichten/new-nullzereptool-uses-telegram-to-launch-20-ddos-methods-with-rotating-proxies/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686247/it-security-nachrichten/new-nullzereptool-uses-telegram-to-launch-20-ddos-methods-with-rotating-proxies/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 14:20:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NULLZEREPTOOL is a newly uncovered attack framework that turns a Telegram bot into a remote control panel for powerful distributed denial of service campaigns backed by rotating proxy infrastructure. The framework came to light when a single Pastebin post was flagged during continuous paste‑site monitoring, exposing the full Python source for a Telegram‑managed DDoS and […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/nullzereptool-uses-telegram/">New NULLZEREPTOOL Uses Telegram to Launch 20 DDoS Methods With Rotating Proxies</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The $3 trillion assembly line: Why CIOs must industrialize the data center supply chain]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[You are one of the six billion people (75% of the world population) online today, and every click you make is routed through the data center. Data centers, whether knowingly or unknowingly, play a very critical role in your daily online activities. With an increasing population, increasing usage ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686216/it-nachrichten/the-3-trillion-assembly-line-why-cios-must-industrialize-the-data-center-supply-chain/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686216/it-nachrichten/the-3-trillion-assembly-line-why-cios-must-industrialize-the-data-center-supply-chain/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 14:04:29 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You are one of the six billion people (75% of the world population) online today, and every click you make is routed through the data center. Data centers, whether knowingly or unknowingly, play a very critical role in your daily online activities. With an increasing population, increasing usage of online presence, and now omniscient AI, the demand for data centers has increased manyfold, and the trend seems similar to the year 2000, when telephone towers were built to accommodate increased digital presence.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To win the AI race, Hyperscalers (Google, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, Alibaba, Oracle, IBM, Tencent) are spending huge amounts of money on data center development. In the USA, the hyperscalers are planning to spend <a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/news/big-tech-set-to-spend-650-billion-in-2026-as-ai-investments-soar-163907630.html">$650 billion in 2026, which is around 70% higher than 2025 spending</a>, according to Yahoo Finance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As per McKinsey research, by 2030, companies will invest around $7 trillion in Capex on data center infrastructure globally. More than $4 trillion will go towards computing hardware investment. More than 40% of this spending will be invested in the United States.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Demand growth in data centers</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">McKinsey analysis shows that global demand for data center capacity can more than triple by 2030, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 22 per cent. In the USA, data center demand could grow by 20-25 per cent at the same time.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The data center industry is currently undergoing a violent transition. We are moving away from the era of “bespoke projects” — where every facility was a unique architectural feat — into an era of industrialized infrastructure. With global capital expenditure in the sector projected to hit $3 trillion by 2028, the “bottleneck” has shifted. It is no longer about securing the capital; it is about the physics of the supply chain.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During my tenure at Vantage, managing the intersection of data center construction management (DCCM) and infrastructure management (DCIM), I saw firsthand that the most successful players aren’t those with the deepest pockets, but those with the most integrated data threads. If your construction data in Procore doesn’t talk to your financial reality in Yardi, or your operational capacity in DCIM, you aren’t building a data center — you’re managing a $500 million blind spot.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The death of “sticks and bricks”</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Traditionally, data center construction was treated as civil engineering. But for the modern CIO, a data center is a complex product assembly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The challenges are systemic. We are facing 50-to-80-week lead times for critical “long-pole” items: extra-high-voltage transformers, switchgear, and the liquid cooling manifolds required for the next generation of AI chips. In this environment, the traditional reactive supply chain model is a liability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To survive the $3 trillion inflow, we must adopt a hybrid-agile SCOR (supply chain operations reference) model. This means applying continuous flow logic to standardized components (like modular power skids) while maintaining agile responsiveness for the volatile IT layer.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The digital bridge: Construction management software  to ERP</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most significant opportunity for CIOs lies in financial-operational integration. In many organizations, there is a data chasm between the construction site and the corporate office. Construction teams live in the construction management software tracking tasks, trades, RFIs and payment submittals. Finance teams operate corporate offices with project management tools (worth remembering that email is a key tool besides spreadsheets and phone calls) tracking capex schedule, commissioning timeline, capital drawdowns and asset lifecycle management.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These systems are siloed; the CIO loses visibility into the total cost to serve. By integrating construction management into the financial system, we create real-time financial visibility of the build. We can see exactly how a three-week delay in a chiller delivery impacts the internal rate of return (IRR) of the entire asset. This isn’t just accounting; it’s strategic telemetry.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">From BIM to DCIM: The lifecycle thread</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The second bridge is the handoff from construction (BIM) to operations (DCIM). Historically, this handoff was a nightmare of PDFs and Excel sheets. By the time the operations team took the keys, the “as-built” design information was already out of date.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The opportunity today is to maintain a continuous data thread. The sensor data and asset tags established during the “make” phase in our SCOR model should flow directly into the DCIM. This allows us to perform virtual commissioning. Before a single server is racked, we should already have a digital replica of the airflow, power distribution, and cooling capacity.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The scientific inference: AI in the supply chain</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As someone who has led data and AI initiatives, I’ve seen the hype. But in the supply chain, the application of AI must be pragmatic, not generative. We don’t need AI to write poems; we need it for predictive procurement. Most organizations manage their procurement in ERP or a mix of a few tools to manage the source-to-settle business flow. Adopting a system workflow improves data collection and the state of the procurement cycle, which in turn provides AI with the context to draw inferences for possible delays and anomalies in original specifications and change orders.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By applying machine learning to global logistics data, we can move from just-in-time to just-in-case modeling. AI can analyze geopolitical risks, shipping lane congestion, and raw material pricing to tell a CIO: <em>“Order your switchgear 14 months early, or your Q3 2027 ‘Power On’ date is at risk.”</em></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Bringing it all together: AI in the supply chain and finance</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Why it matters: Approximately 70% of the capex is on this workflow and making timely decisions that directly impact the ready-for-service dates. The current challenge of reactionary adjustment in design to procurement to local fit-out is a significant drain on capex efficiency and cost of capital. Because single-project delivery delays have become so volatile, a massive structural shift is occurring in how digital infrastructure is funded. Single-project debt (special purpose vehicles or SPVs) is facing severe friction. To insulate themselves from RFS shocks, the largest institutional players are moving toward permanent platform capital — aggregating exposure across dozens of global assets simultaneously.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Navigating these complex multi-billion-dollar engineering projects distributed over a large geography is simply unmanageable without rethinking and re-engineering existing tools and processes.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The roadmap for the modern CIO</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To lead this transformation, CIOs must move beyond the IT shop mentality and become master orchestrators of the supply chain. Here is the 1500-word reality condensed into three mandates:</p>



<ol start="1" class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Standardize the product:</strong> Stop designing bespoke facilities. Move toward DFMA (design for manufacturing and assembly). If 70% of your data center can be built in a factory and shipped as modules, you bypass the unpredictability of on-site labor.</li>



<li><strong>Integrate the financial stack:</strong> If your construction management software and your ERP aren’t sharing a heartbeat, your data is lying to you. Force the integration between Procore and Yardi.</li>



<li><strong>Own the long poles:</strong> Don’t leave the procurement of transformers and cooling units to general contractors. Use your balance sheet to secure these items years in advance. In 2026, inventory is the new currency.</li>
</ol>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CISA orders urgent action on actively exploited Langflow RCE flaw]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) on Tuesday ordered U.S. government agencies to prioritize patching an actively exploited vulnerability in the Langflow visual framework for building AI agents. [...]]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686200/it-security-nachrichten/cisa-orders-urgent-action-on-actively-exploited-langflow-rce-flaw/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686200/it-security-nachrichten/cisa-orders-urgent-action-on-actively-exploited-langflow-rce-flaw/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 13:59:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) on Tuesday ordered U.S. government agencies to prioritize patching an actively exploited vulnerability in the Langflow visual framework for building AI agents. [...]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[macOS 27: Golden Gate kündigt DVD-Wiedergabe-Framework ab]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple schießt demnächst ein Framework zur DVD-Wiedergabe ab. Als Nächstes ist dann die gesamte Wiedergabe dran. Doch es gibt Alternativen.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3686133/it-nachrichten/macos-27-golden-gate-kuendigt-dvd-wiedergabe-framework-ab/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3686133/it-nachrichten/macos-27-golden-gate-kuendigt-dvd-wiedergabe-framework-ab/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 13:32:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple schießt demnächst ein Framework zur DVD-Wiedergabe ab. Als Nächstes ist dann die gesamte Wiedergabe dran. Doch es gibt Alternativen.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Box expands enterprise AI governance with new agent security featuresox]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Box has announced new security capabilities designed to give organizations greater control over AI agents working with enterprise content. With new agent guardrails, third-party agent activity oversight, prompt injection detection, agent classification-based access policies, and more, customers w...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685997/it-security-nachrichten/box-expands-enterprise-ai-governance-with-new-agent-security-featuresox/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685997/it-security-nachrichten/box-expands-enterprise-ai-governance-with-new-agent-security-featuresox/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 12:41:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Box has announced new security capabilities designed to give organizations greater control over AI agents working with enterprise content. With new agent guardrails, third-party agent activity oversight, prompt injection detection, agent classification-based access policies, and more, customers will be able to extend Box’s security controls to both Box Agents and third-party agents, such as Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini. These new capabilities expand Box’s trusted governance framework to agentic workflows, enabling organizations to confidently deploy and … <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/07/22/box-new-security-capabilities/" rel="nofollow">More <span class="meta-nav">→</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/07/22/box-new-security-capabilities/">Box expands enterprise AI governance with new agent security featuresox</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/">Help Net Security</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The AI bill is the easy part. The hard part is everything it changed]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Your CFO has a simple question. “We’re spending more on AI. What are we getting for it?” Most CIOs cannot answer it — not because AI isn’t creating value, but because the accounting systems we inherited were built before AI existed as a category of labor.



This June, the conversation shifted fr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685909/it-security-nachrichten/the-ai-bill-is-the-easy-part-the-hard-part-is-everything-it-changed/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685909/it-security-nachrichten/the-ai-bill-is-the-easy-part-the-hard-part-is-everything-it-changed/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 12:14:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Your CFO has a simple question. “We’re spending more on AI. What are we getting for it?” Most CIOs cannot answer it — not because AI isn’t creating value, but because the accounting systems we inherited were built before AI existed as a category of labor.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This June, the conversation shifted from token maxing to token cutting. <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/">The New York Times</a> reported that Meta, Uber, Walmart and Amazon are capping employee AI usage. Uber blew through its 2026 AI budget in four months. Satya Nadella started framing it as human capital versus token capital.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">All of that is true. None of it answers the CFO. Capping tokens is an input lever, not an output measure. And the <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178320/tokenmaxxing-when-ai-adoption-metrics-go-bad.html">human-versus-token framing</a> names two sources of labor when the reality is four.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The enterprise now has 4 sources of labor</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are humans. There are humans assisted by AI. Humans are working alongside AI. And humans are managing AI. Sources two through four are all supervised machine labor at different intensities — none of them have a line item, a manager or an hourly rate. In our <a href="https://withlanai.com/ai-labor-report">2026 AI Labor Report</a>, 78% of leaders view AI as both software and a labor force. The org chart has not caught up. Neither has the P&amp;L.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/table-1-four-source-framework.png?w=1024" alt="Four-source framework and A-Level taxonomy: Lanai  ·  Lanai / Wakefield Research, n=200, March–April 2026" class="wp-image-4198947" width="1024" height="502" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>Four-source framework and A-Level taxonomy: Lanai  ·  Lanai / Wakefield Research, n=200, March–April 2026</em></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Lexi Reese</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most enterprises are stuck at A-Level 1 with no accounting for any of it, while quietly sliding into A-Level 2. The job descriptions have not caught up. The budget has not caught up. You cannot upskill into a role that has not been named.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI is the only category of work the modern enterprise has ever bought without a system of record for what it produced.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What you are actually running is supervised machine labor</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model does a first pass. A human makes it usable. One hundred percent of leaders we surveyed said AI work requires human review before it ships; 34% said substantial editing. That is a workforce with no manager, no hourly rate and no line on the income statement.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">The accounting breaks in 3 places at once</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Under GAAP: COGS if it helps produce the product, OpEx if it does work for you. The same workflow can hit all three buckets at once. A tier-one support resolution involves the human’s salary (OpEx), the AI’s tokens (COGS if support is a delivered service), and the supervisor’s review time (OpEx). Three buckets. One piece of work. No reconciliation. The token invoice arrives from Anthropic or OpenAI and gets coded to OpEx-software because that is what the bill looks like. Audit partners will be asking about this by next year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When you call AI a tool, you book it like software. When you call it labor, you have to ask which kind and what it is producing.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The per-employee number is the wrong unit</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Per-employee AI spend collapses a workforce into a per-head average. It hides the only number that matters: What AI is producing inside each workflow.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Lanai measured two teams inside the same finance organization. Same monthly prep and variance analysis. AI took the same amount of time to produce outputs of similar quality. The only variable was the model each team reached for by default — a choice nobody had made deliberately and <a href="https://withlanai.com/ai-labor-report">nobody had seen until it was measured</a>.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/table-2-white-labeled-example.png?w=1024" alt="White-labeled example. Workflow profile, hours and economics drawn from a representative customer engagement." class="wp-image-4198945" width="1024" height="485" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>White-labeled example. Workflow profile, hours and economics drawn from a representative customer engagement.</em></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Lexi Reese</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The gap existed for months before anyone saw it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Faith-based budgeting — the organizational equivalent of putting money in the collection plate and hoping God handles the ROI — is what made it invisible.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/table-3-lanai-wakefield-research.png?w=1024" alt="Lanai / Wakefield Research  ·  n=200  ·  U.S. enterprises 1,000+  ·  March–April 2026" class="wp-image-4198944" width="1024" height="199" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>Lanai / Wakefield Research  ·  n=200  ·  U.S. enterprises 1,000+  ·  March–April 2026</em></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Lexi Reese</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI labor orphaning</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is not a measurement problem. It is a category error. We call it AI Labor Orphaning. AI does the work. The output gets credited to the human who approved it. The token bill lands in OpEx-software. The supervision time absorbs into salaried hours nobody is auditing. Eighty-seven percent of leaders admitted AI output is sometimes or always credited entirely to the human employee. This is the last-click attribution problem of the AI era, running in reverse.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What fills the vacuum? Belief. Forty-three percent assume that if AI was involved, it contributed. Only twelve percent have a clear methodology. Seventy-nine percent are worried AI budgets will be cut because they cannot connect spend to results. The cuts are not coming because AI does not work. They are coming because nobody can prove that it did.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Capping tokens may look like responsible governance, but it is like turning off a staticky radio rather than tuning the dial. The companies cutting AI budgets in 2026 will discover in 2027 that they cut the workflows that worked alongside the ones that did not.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The real cost of AI is not the model. It is the redesign</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Three layers. Most organizations only manage the first.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/table-4-managing-layer-one.png?w=1024" alt="Managing Layer 1 without Layers 2 and 3 is how you optimize the invoice while missing the transformation." class="wp-image-4198946" width="1024" height="335" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>Managing Layer 1 without Layers 2 and 3 is how you optimize the invoice while missing the transformation.</em></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Lexi Reese</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What to actually do</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://withlanai.com/ai-labor-report">12% of organizations</a> that can answer the CFO treat AI like every other category of labor — with a cost per AI Work Hour that is accounted for by a set of AI assistants, co-pilots and agents that are held accountable to performance standards. </p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Audit the four sources separately. Each A-Level has different token economics, SaaS implications and human redesign requirements.</li>



<li>Find the embedded SaaS repricing before your next renewal. Pull your top 20 contracts. Ask whether AI features previously included are now priced incrementally.</li>



<li>Redesign the human role at A-Level 2 before you scale it. You cannot upskill into a role that has not been named.</li>



<li>Build a system of record before you build the next agent. Start with one department. Two weeks. You will find something that surprises you.</li>



<li>Stop calling it a tool. Start calling it labor. The language determines the chart of accounts.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When your blended AI rate is $22 an hour, the conversation shifts from ‘we spent $340,000 on AI’ to ‘we acquired a skilled workforce at $22 an hour.’ That sentence is defensible. A vendor invoice is not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The CIOs who will have a defensible AI story in 2027 are the ones who renamed the work in 2026. Not because technology changed. Because they finally built the accounting to see it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Findings are drawn from the </em><a href="https://withlanai.com/ai-labor-report">2026 AI Labor Report</a><em>, fielded by Wakefield Research with 200 senior technology leaders at US enterprises of 1,000-plus employees, March 20–April 8, 2026 (±6.9pp at 95% confidence).</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Unsloth vs Axolotl vs TRL vs LLaMA-Factory: A Fine-Tuning Framework Comparison on Speed, VRAM, and Multi-GPU]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Four open source projects dominate LLM fine-tuning today. Unsloth, Axolotl, TRL, and LLaMA-Factory all wrap the same underlying PyTorch and Hugging Face stack. They diverge on where they spend engineering effort. Unsloth rewrites kernels. Axolotl composes parallelism strategies. TRL defines the t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685789/ai-nachrichten/unsloth-vs-axolotl-vs-trl-vs-llama-factory-a-fine-tuning-framework-comparison-on-speed-vram-and-multi-gpu/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685789/ai-nachrichten/unsloth-vs-axolotl-vs-trl-vs-llama-factory-a-fine-tuning-framework-comparison-on-speed-vram-and-multi-gpu/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:22:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four open source projects dominate LLM fine-tuning today. Unsloth, Axolotl, TRL, and LLaMA-Factory all wrap the same underlying PyTorch and Hugging Face stack. They diverge on where they spend engineering effort. Unsloth rewrites kernels. Axolotl composes parallelism strategies. TRL defines the trainer APIs the others build on. LLaMA-Factory optimizes for breadth of model coverage and […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.marktechpost.com/2026/07/22/unsloth-vs-axolotl-vs-trl-vs-llama-factory-a-fine-tuning-framework-comparison-on-speed-vram-and-multi-gpu/">Unsloth vs Axolotl vs TRL vs LLaMA-Factory: A Fine-Tuning Framework Comparison on Speed, VRAM, and Multi-GPU</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.marktechpost.com/">MarkTechPost</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[From outsourcing to ownership: How we brought development in-house without breaking delivery]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Outsourcing worked – until it didn’t.



After Akirolabs achieved early market validation and onboarded its first enterprise customers, outsourcing began to create strategic limitations around scalability, intellectual property (IP) ownership, security and delivery execution.



The challenges st...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685759/it-security-nachrichten/from-outsourcing-to-ownership-how-we-brought-development-in-house-without-breaking-delivery/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685759/it-security-nachrichten/from-outsourcing-to-ownership-how-we-brought-development-in-house-without-breaking-delivery/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:11:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Outsourcing worked – until it didn’t.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After Akirolabs achieved early market validation and onboarded its first enterprise customers, outsourcing began to create strategic limitations around scalability, intellectual property (IP) ownership, security and delivery execution.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The challenges started after the first enterprise customers confirmed product-market fit. At that point, delivery speed became directly tied to business growth. Product quality expectations increased. Infrastructure and security requirements became stricter. Investors started asking difficult but<a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4069909/10-outsourcing-strategy-questions-every-it-leader-must-answer.html"> </a><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4069909/10-outsourcing-strategy-questions-every-it-leader-must-answer.html">fair questions</a> about IP ownership, operational dependencies and long-term scalability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most importantly, engineering execution was no longer just an operational function – it became part of the company’s strategic advantage. That was the moment when the founders decided the company needed dedicated technology leadership to address these challenges. This is how I joined the company at the beginning of 2023. As VP of Engineering and a bit later as CTO, I led the transformation (usually known as<a href="https://www.cio.com/article/272355/outsourcing-outsourcing-definition-and-solutions.html"> </a><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/272355/outsourcing-outsourcing-definition-and-solutions.html">insourcing, repatriating or backsourcing</a>) from an outsourced model to an internal engineering organization while maintaining product delivery continuity and preparing the company for the next growth stage. The process took roughly a year and involved not only technical migration, but also organizational design, hiring, process development, infrastructure modernization and cultural transformation – everything from the ground up.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Building an internal engineering organization while still delivering</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the biggest misconceptions about insourcing is that it is primarily a technical project. It is a leadership and execution challenge.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When I joined the company, there was effectively no internal engineering structure, limited visibility into the existing system and no clear long-term technical strategy. My first months were dedicated to understanding reality and I began with a comprehensive assessment of the codebase, operational risks, documentation quality and knowledge dependencies to determine the most viable transition strategy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Very early in the process, I faced a critical strategic decision: whether to gradually assume ownership of the existing platform or rebuild it internally. To make that decision, I evaluated four distinct transition models ranging from limited management insourcing to a complete internal rebuild.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After assessing the technical, operational and long-term business implications of each approach, I selected the most demanding option: rebuilding the product internally while maintaining uninterrupted delivery for existing customers. Although riskier in the short term, a full rebuild offered the clearest route to complete IP ownership, architectural flexibility and long-term scalability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At the time, this decision ran counter to the approach typically taken by startups in similar situations. Most organizations gradually assume ownership of an existing codebase to minimize short-term risk and preserve delivery capacity. My assessment was that the accumulated architectural debt, fragmented knowledge distribution and long-term maintenance risks would ultimately make a phased takeover more expensive and less scalable than a controlled rebuild. The strategy required significantly higher execution discipline, but it allowed us to establish complete ownership of the platform, eliminate inherited constraints and create an architecture capable of supporting enterprise-scale growth.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The next challenge was hiring.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In Germany, hiring can easily take four to six months – mostly due to a typical 3-month notice period, which is incompatible with startup timelines. We solved this by building a hybrid organization structure early: a lean internal core team combined with carefully selected contractors. Instead of hiring only narrow specialists, we prioritized experienced generalists capable of operating across architecture, infrastructure, security and compliance discussions. Later, we evolved toward a<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uSc1o6hdJ5AweCsjcLzo3JAzvq1q-7ALl1MPMNWx2sQ/edit?usp=sharing"> </a><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uSc1o6hdJ5AweCsjcLzo3JAzvq1q-7ALl1MPMNWx2sQ/edit?usp=sharing">product engineering model</a>, where engineers owned broader product outcomes rather than narrowly defined technical functions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During the first three months, we established a core engineering team of four senior engineers. Over the following nine months, the organization expanded to roughly fifteen engineers while I strategically designed and executed the transformation of the platform’s architecture to meet the rigorous deployment and compliance standards of our first enterprise clients, including Raiffeisen Bank International and Bertelsmann. This structural overhaul allowed the company to meet the deployment, security and compliance requirements of enterprise customers that had previously been inaccessible under the outsourced model. At that point, we had already achieved complete coverage across backend, frontend, DevOps, QA and security.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I also intentionally kept processes lightweight during the transition. Instead of introducing heavyweight frameworks, we focused on clarity of priorities, fast decision-making and execution discipline. We used Kanban over Scrum, eliminated unnecessary meetings, shortened the remaining ones and emphasized engineering culture over process overhead.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another major challenge was project estimation. Because dual-track development was unavoidable until the in-house platform reached production readiness, estimation accuracy had a direct impact on budget efficiency. Despite all challenges, my initial estimate ultimately proved remarkably close to the final delivery date, differing by only about a week. Accurate forecasting under conditions of parallel development streams, ongoing customer commitments and active team formation became a critical leadership challenge. Maintaining this level of predictability throughout the transition helped align engineering execution with business planning, hiring decisions and investor expectations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The engineering transformation enabled capabilities that contributed to Akirolabs being recognized as an IDC Innovator in Procurement in 2023, named amongst the Top 27 AI Startups in Germany in 2024, Sifted’s 100 Fastest-Growing Startups in DACH &amp; CEE 2025 and inclusion in 2024-2026 in ProcureTech100 annual recognition of procurement technology providers shaping the future of digital procurement.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Managing risk without slowing down the business</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The hardest part of insourcing is not writing code, selecting the technology stack, designing architecture or configuring infrastructure. It is avoiding disruption while the company is changing underneath the product. I successfully orchestrated the concurrent overhaul of product architecture, cross-functional engineering recruitment, infrastructure modernization and live customer operations under exceptionally tight margins.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To reduce delivery risk, we approached the transition in layers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">First, we focused on<a href="https://platformengineering.com/features/the-platform-centric-shift-why-enterprise-ai-teams-need-internal-ai-platforms-not-more-engineers/"> </a><a href="https://platformengineering.com/features/the-platform-centric-shift-why-enterprise-ai-teams-need-internal-ai-platforms-not-more-engineers/">infrastructure reliability and operational readiness</a> before feature expansion. Cloud architecture, recovery testing, permission segregation and incident management processes were implemented early, not after launch. We also introduced multiple testing stages and dedicated QA functions after learning the hard way that a “developers-only” quality control approach does not scale for complex web platforms and business domains.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Second, we established a structured knowledge-transfer process to rapidly onboard engineers and reduce external dependencies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Third, we became extremely disciplined about scope management. One of the most common reasons<a href="https://www.cio.com/article/244453/whether-outsourcing-or-insourcing-cios-need-control.html"> </a><a href="https://www.cio.com/article/244453/whether-outsourcing-or-insourcing-cios-need-control.html">insourcing initiatives fail is uncontrolled change</a> during the rebuild phase. Every new feature request increases uncertainty non-linearly. We learned to separate strategic improvements from distractions and protect the core delivery roadmap aggressively. Throughout the transition, we successfully maintained uninterrupted customer operations by utilizing planned maintenance windows, achieved a near-zero-downtime migration and permanently doubled product velocity immediately following the migration.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beyond the technical migration itself, the transition established a repeatable operating model for scaling technology organizations beyond the product-market-fit stage. The framework combined organizational redesign, controlled knowledge repatriation, architecture modernization and enterprise-grade operational practices while maintaining uninterrupted customer delivery throughout the transformation. While the implementation was specific to Akirolabs, the underlying principles are broadly applicable to organizations seeking to transition from outsourced development to internal product ownership without disrupting business operations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By the time the new platform reached production readiness, I had established not only a functioning engineering organization, but also a stable operational model: internal ownership, production-grade infrastructure, security processes, scalable hiring practices and clear technology and product roadmaps.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A positive side effect of the transition was the creation of internal UI/UX and Data Science capabilities, which later became strategically important for AI product initiatives and created a foundation for the third version of the product, which we released in mid-2025.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">My technical restructuring and migration to a secure proprietary platform reduced architectural risk, established full in-house ownership and helped strengthen investor confidence during the company’s successful €5M fundraising round in 2024.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The transition created a stronger foundation for scale and supported the company’s continued expansion among enterprise organizations operating at Fortune 500 scale, including Ahold Delhaize, Workday, IFF, Deutsche Bahn and others.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Lessons learned for CTOs considering insourcing</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking back, several decisions made the transition successful, and several mistakes made it harder than necessary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first lesson is simple: decisiveness in strategic transition is paramount to maintaining business momentum. Rapidly evaluating insourcing frameworks and defining clear boundaries with the external partner allowed us to mitigate operational downtime and execute a highly efficient migration ahead of critical market deadlines.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Second, hire more senior people and do it as early as possible. Strong technical leaders multiply execution capacity far beyond their individual contribution. In our case, the quality of the first hires influenced architecture quality, hiring standards, delivery discipline and engineering culture for the entire organization.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Finally, culture matters more than frameworks. Processes can be added later. Ownership mentality cannot.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The biggest long-term advantage of bringing development in-house was not simply faster execution, not better code quality or operational cost optimization by over 30% after the transition which we also achieved. It was an alignment. Product strategy, engineering decisions, customer priorities and business goals became part of the same conversation instead of being separated by organizational boundaries. For technology companies operating in highly competitive markets, that alignment becomes a compounding advantage over time.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Agentic coding is everywhere]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I use a very cool and relatively new web framework called Astro. The keen insight that the Astro team had was that most websites are made up of static content, so they made it really easy to add content to a website. To add a blog post to my personal website, all I have to do is create a Markdown...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685748/ai-nachrichten/agentic-coding-is-everywhere/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685748/ai-nachrichten/agentic-coding-is-everywhere/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:04:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I use a very cool and relatively new web framework called <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3842325/designing-a-dynamic-web-application-with-astro-js.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3842325/designing-a-dynamic-web-application-with-astro-js.html">Astro</a>. The keen insight that the Astro team had was that most websites are made up of static content, so they made it really easy to add content to a website. To add a blog post to <a href="https://nickhodges.com/">my personal website</a>, all I have to do is create a Markdown file with some front matter, deploy it, and the blog post automatically appears. If I need to reach deeper for more dynamic functionality, I can easily do that with <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257305/what-is-typescript-strongly-typed-javascript.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2257305/what-is-typescript-strongly-typed-javascript.html">TypeScript</a>, <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253289/react-tutorial-get-started-with-the-reactjs-javascript-library.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2253289/react-tutorial-get-started-with-the-reactjs-javascript-library.html">React</a>, or almost any other framework. It’s really cool.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And these days, I really don’t write any code. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4136718/claude-code-is-blowing-me-away.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4136718/claude-code-is-blowing-me-away.html">Claude Code</a> does most (all?) of the work. Since Astro is <a href="https://github.com/withastro/astro">an open-source project</a> and has <a href="https://docs.astro.build/">excellent documentation</a>, Claude knows all about how Astro works. It has no trouble at all managing my site and making the improvements I ask for.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And that got me thinking, how does Astro get built? Is the Astro team building with agentic coding? Astro itself has many dependencies, including big projects like Vite and Node. And of course, Vite and Node have dependencies, too. Are those dependencies being developed by hand, or are those development teams also using AI agents to code?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">My curiosity got the best of me, and I asked Claude to dig deeper. It turns out that the Astro repository has <a href="https://github.com/withastro/astro/blob/main/AGENTS.md">an AGENTS.md</a> file, and some of the commits even have commit message trailers indicating that they were at least co-authored by Claude and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3609013/github-copilot-everything-you-need-to-know.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3609013/github-copilot-everything-you-need-to-know.html">GitHub Copilot</a>. Further down, there is a <code>.agents/skills</code> directory with skills covering development, merging, triage, and more. I poked around for a look, and someone has done a great job building agentic support.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now my interest is really piqued, and further investigation reveals quite a bit of interesting stuff. About a year ago, documentation started appearing about how to build Astro sites with coding agents.  Around that same time, the docs team released an <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">MCP server</a> that gives developers coding agents deeper, easier access to the Astro documentation.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And there are small steps in the Astro codebase that indicate it is “agentic ready.” For instance, the command-line development server can tell when it is being started by an agent, and the application itself can tell if it is being driven by an agent. Small things, but steps in the direction of embracing Astro developers who use coding agents. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Okay, that was a fun spelunking trip. But so what?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The “so what” is that code is going to be commoditized. As an Astro developer I am using AI agents pretty much all of the time. The Astro development team is starting to use AI agents more and more. The folks building the Astro dependencies are using AI agents. Shoot, the people building Claude Code and the agents themselves are “eating their own dogfood” and <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/institute/recursive-self-improvement">using their own tools to build the next frontier model</a>. Before we know it, it will be <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down">turtles all the way down</a>. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">No one says “who generated that electricity?” or “who wove the fabric in that shirt?” any more. And it won’t be long before no one says “Who wrote the code for that app?” because it won’t matter. Just as we don’t look at the assembly code written by our compilers, we’ll stop looking at the “regular” code written by our agents. I’m not even sure anyone is <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39587051" data-type="link" data-id="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39587051">writing assembly code anymore</a>. Soon we’ll be saying that about TypeScript, Python, and C++.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Seven sins of the modern software developer]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[If you ask us in an official setting, our official position is that software engineering norms still apply. Rigorous CI/CD pipelines, elegant architectural patterns, and an unyielding commitment to maintainable code remain the standard. We will use weighty words like “determinism,” “scalability,”...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685746/ai-nachrichten/seven-sins-of-the-modern-software-developer/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685746/ai-nachrichten/seven-sins-of-the-modern-software-developer/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:04:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you ask us in an official setting, our official position is that software engineering norms still apply. Rigorous CI/CD pipelines, elegant architectural patterns, and an unyielding commitment to maintainable code remain the standard. We will use weighty words like “determinism,” “scalability,” “idempotency,” and “domain-driven design.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But behind closed doors, late at night, bathed in the glow of a dark-mode IDE, a different and more sordid reality is exposed. Hunched over the console with a manic gleam in the eye, the programmer has become power-drunk on <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335213/large-language-models-the-foundations-of-generative-ai.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335213/large-language-models-the-foundations-of-generative-ai.html">LLMs</a>. Like mad wizards casting spells, we summon the awesome powers of models and agents to satisfy our every programming whim—and commit acts of software engineering that would make <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Brooks">Fred Brooks</a> blush.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let’s just be honest about what is actually happening.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Esoteric knowledge is superfluous</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Forget <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2335255/what-is-object-oriented-programming-the-everyday-programming-style.html">OOP</a> and <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2263963/what-is-functional-programming-a-practical-guide.html">FP</a>. Forget the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAP_theorem">CAP theorem</a>, the holy crusade of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_repeat_yourself">DRY</a>, and the design patterns. Honestly, you can even forget what frameworks, runtimes, and deployment platforms you are using. The AI will figure out what is best to use and understand what is already in place. We have more mental bandwidth for working on our side project (a novel about AI taking over the world). </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Of course, I exaggerate. A little.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The docs are dead to us</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We still say RTFM, but the truth is, we haven’t really read a page of vendor documentation since 2023. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/3993482/ai-didnt-kill-stack-overflow.html">Stack Overflow</a>, once our Internet Mecca, is a husk. When a package throws a weird exception, we don’t trace the execution path or read the release notes. We highlight the red text, copy the entire 200-line stack trace, dump it into the chat, and wait for the machine to spoon-feed us the solution.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Better yet, we just have the agentic IDE spot the error, divine a solution, and ask us if it’s OK. We might glance at the problem-solution description, if we have gone around the circle on the problem for a few cycles. Maybe. If we don’t have the agent set up for auto-confirm.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We used to buy heavy tomes like “Rust In Action” that were more like masonry blocks than literature. Now? We just ask an AI to transliterate our JavaScript logic into Rust. We are no longer engineers methodically learning a system. We are glorified copy-paste orchestrators hoping that the stochastic parrot behind the prompt guesses the syntax correctly.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">We ignore how the back end is wired</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We act like we meticulously designed the data flows, carefully crafted the relational constraints, and mindfully mapped the API relationships. The reality is rather more disturbing: We asked the AI to scaffold a modern deployment, hooked it up to a back-end database, and just sort of… ran it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It created security rules we don’t fully understand. They do seem to work, however, which is nice. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It generated a schema that we skimmed for about four seconds. It looks reasonable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It wrote <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2259359/what-is-infrastructure-as-code-automating-your-infrastructure-builds.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2259359/what-is-infrastructure-as-code-automating-your-infrastructure-builds.html">infrastructure-as-code</a> scripts that provisioned cloud resources we are hoping don’t blow a hole in the budget. Presumably, whoever is in charge of that will manage it by stuffing the metrics into another chatbot.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We nodded, committed the code, and went to lunch. If management asked us to manually deploy the stack from scratch, configure the environment variables, and wire the API routes without our chat window, we would give them a vacant stare.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We understand that management is also using AI to manage the project.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Our tests are uncomfortably incestuous</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Test-driven development (TDD) used to be a beautiful dream, ever just beyond reach. It made us feel glorious and despondent at turns. It would burden us with sprawling dependencies if implemented too religiously. (See <a href="https://grugbrain.dev/#grug-on-testing">The Grug Brained Developer</a> in this regard.)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But now we can attain 95% test coverage almost effortlessly. Why not just add them in while we are auto-generating everything else?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We can now wax at length to anyone who will listen about our astounding test coverage and our automated quality assurance. Unit tests, integration tests, smoke tests, you name it. What we conveniently leave out is that the AI wrote the complex application logic, and then we asked <em>the exact same AI</em> to write the test suite to validate the code it just dreamed up.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is a hermetically sealed loop of algorithmic self-congratulation. The mocks, the edge case, and the assertions are an echo chamber of the model’s original assumptions. The machine is grading its own homework, giving itself an A+.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And we are happy to accept this because, beautifully, when the code has to change, the AI will effortlessly hallucinate new tests to adapt to the churn.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">We pass off the AI’s architecture as strategy</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI can produce astonishing design documents. Truly breathtaking. They are cogent, they’re beautifully formatted, and they seamlessly bridge the gap between high-level business goals and granular technical specs. They even include those auto-generated sequence diagrams that wow management.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When we present these spotless architectural proposals in the Tuesday sprint planning meeting, we lean back, take a long sip of coffee, and humbly wave away the team’s praise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What we don’t mention is that we spent exactly four seconds generating it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Are these AI-generated documents just as liable as human ones to hide severe, mortal flaws in scope and alignment? Absolutely. They might contain a foundational logic bomb that will eventually doom the entire project. But the markdown is so crisp, and the bullet points are so persuasive, that the eye just glides right over it. We will never truly know the depth of the disaster until it is far too late. But hey, we’ll burn that bridge when production catches fire. Until then, we are strategic visionaries.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">We’re addicted to vibe coding (but only in secret)</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We loudly mock the term on social media. We roll our eyes in Slack channels when the kids on TikTok talk about <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4078884/what-is-vibe-coding-ai-writes-the-code-so-developers-can-think-big.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4078884/what-is-vibe-coding-ai-writes-the-code-so-developers-can-think-big.html">vibe coding</a> their new startups. We fiercely cling to our identities as hardened, serious developers who understand memory management, garbage collection, and bitwise operators. We are professionals, damn it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But late at night, when the managers are asleep and no one is looking? We absolutely love it. We love just throwing a chaotic, half-baked thought at the canvas, pouring a drink, and watching the AI magically build a functioning user interface based entirely on our long-deferred whims. I may finally build that working <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultima_V%3A_Warriors_of_Destiny" data-type="link" data-id="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultima_V%3A_Warriors_of_Destiny">Ultima V</a> clone. The thrill of typing “Create an app that tracks my cryptocurrency portfolio but makes it look like the interface from Neuromancer” and having it appear 30 seconds later is heady stuff.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The more deeply rooted in the hard, old-school realities of programming, the more profound is the joy the developer finds in the possibility of AI coding. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">We beat the problem into submission with prompts</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Like Adam Sandler in “Uncut Gems,” we are convinced the next round will fix everything. This is us with prompts. When things are going really off the rails, instead of putting our boots on and wading into the brambles of complexity, we resort to tonal adjustments. These range from the condescending: </p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This problem is not fixed. Look at it closely. The error is right here.</p>
</blockquote>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To the desperate: </p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We have been working on this same problem for hours now!</p>
</blockquote>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To the pathetic: </p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Can’t you find a different approach to try?!</p>
</blockquote>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The astonishing part? It often works.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But there is no poetry left at the bottom of the rabbit hole; it is verbal warfare. When the context window collapses, when the regressions start cascading, and when the AI stubbornly refuses to follow the most basic rules of temporal logic, the mask of professionalism drops away and something far more atavistic makes its appearance. We stop asking nicely, stop trying to understand the why, delete the pleasantries, and capslock our intent.</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What we have here is a failure to communicate! </p>
</blockquote>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We feed the same failing stack trace back into the prompt over and over and over again, aggressively hammering the constraints, explicitly forbidding certain libraries, and pasting in release notes just to confirm that the AI lacks the latest APIs. We force the model down a narrower and narrower path until the code finally stops throwing errors. We don’t actually debug anymore, trace variables, or step through functions. We just apply relentless, iterative pressure until the machine surrenders. We beat it into submission. And then, we push to production.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In fact, there is a real skill here—a sheer “will to completion” that remains in the act of building software. We invest just as much time, energy, and heart wrestling the bot as we ever did emitting syntax.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A blacker box</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The only profession more given over to using AI like a cursed Level 13 artifact than programming is writing. Writing of course is far more open to public scrutiny than code.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And while my tongue has been firmly in my cheek here, my faith in coders as good guys makes me more curious to see what we create than troubled by the dangers. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It was once the case that only other programmers could understand what programmers were doing, what they were producing. Now not even that is true. Only the machine knows what the machine is doing. We just keep it tethered to our aims. Hopefully.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-32807 | datacycle-engine dataCycle-CORE up to 25.07.3 Framework access control (CNNVD-2026-94699194)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability has been found in datacycle-engine dataCycle-CORE up to 25.07.3 and classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the component Framework. This manipulation causes improper access controls.

This vulnerability is registered as CVE-2026-32807. Remote exploitation of th...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685721/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-32807-datacycle-engine-datacycle-core-up-to-25073-framework-access-control-cnnvd-2026-94699194/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685721/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-32807-datacycle-engine-datacycle-core-up-to-25073-framework-access-control-cnnvd-2026-94699194/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 10:55:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability has been found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/datacycle-engine:datacycle-core">datacycle-engine dataCycle-CORE up to 25.07.3</a> and classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">problematic</a>. This affects an unknown part of the component <em>Framework</em>. This manipulation causes improper access controls.

This vulnerability is registered as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-32807">CVE-2026-32807</a>. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[First look: Windows 11 is replacing Windows 95-era Properties dialog, now with dark mode and WinUI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has finally begun replacing the decades-old File Explorer Properties dialog with a modern version, as part of the company’s efforts to modernize Windows 11. Thankfully, the new Properties dialog is built using the native WinUI framework, and we’re not seeing any traces of a WebView2-bas...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685594/windows-tipps/first-look-windows-11-is-replacing-windows-95-era-properties-dialog-now-with-dark-mode-and-winui/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685594/windows-tipps/first-look-windows-11-is-replacing-windows-95-era-properties-dialog-now-with-dark-mode-and-winui/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 10:13:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft has finally begun replacing the decades-old File Explorer Properties dialog with a modern version, as part of the company’s efforts to modernize Windows 11. Thankfully, the new Properties dialog is built using the native WinUI framework, and we’re not seeing any traces of a WebView2-based shell. Right now, the Properties dialog is native to […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.windowslatest.com/2026/07/22/first-look-windows-11-is-replacing-windows-95-era-properties-dialog-now-with-dark-mode-and-winui/">First look: Windows 11 is replacing Windows 95-era Properties dialog, now with dark mode and WinUI</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.windowslatest.com/">Windows Latest</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Betting Trojan Disguises Stolen Round Results as Legitimate Seq Logging Traffic]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This package impersonates the widely used Newtonsoft.Json library while quietly shipping a modified fork that targets Digitain’s FG‑Crash betting backend. For most developers, the package behaves like a fully functional JSON framework. However, on Digitain’s infrastructure it silently rigs crash-...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685558/it-security-nachrichten/betting-trojan-disguises-stolen-round-results-as-legitimate-seq-logging-traffic/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685558/it-security-nachrichten/betting-trojan-disguises-stolen-round-results-as-legitimate-seq-logging-traffic/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:58:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This package impersonates the widely used Newtonsoft.Json library while quietly shipping a modified fork that targets Digitain’s FG‑Crash betting backend. For most developers, the package behaves like a fully functional JSON framework. However, on Digitain’s infrastructure it silently rigs crash-game rounds and, in later generations, exfiltrates those manipulated results to an attacker-controlled host that mimics […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cyberpress.org/betting-trojan-round-spoofing/">Betting Trojan Disguises Stolen Round Results as Legitimate Seq Logging Traffic</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cyberpress.org/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New Attack Framework Harvests WiFi Passwords and Launches Network Flooding Attacks]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A newly uncovered Telegram-controlled attack framework, dubbed NULLZEREPTOOL, combines a functional DDoS engine with code for WiFi password extraction, wireless disruption, proxy rotation, and botnet tasking. Researchers found the Python source in a Pastebin post flagged on April 29, 2026, then i...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685520/it-security-nachrichten/new-attack-framework-harvests-wifi-passwords-and-launches-network-flooding-attacks/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685520/it-security-nachrichten/new-attack-framework-harvests-wifi-passwords-and-launches-network-flooding-attacks/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:27:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A newly uncovered Telegram-controlled attack framework, dubbed NULLZEREPTOOL, combines a functional DDoS engine with code for WiFi password extraction, wireless disruption, proxy rotation, and botnet tasking. Researchers found the Python source in a Pastebin post flagged on April 29, 2026, then identified an earlier version sharing the same hardcoded Telegram bot token, administrator ID, and […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cyberpress.org/wifi-credential-theft-framework/">New Attack Framework Harvests WiFi Passwords and Launches Network Flooding Attacks</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cyberpress.org/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[heise+ | Digitale Souveränität in der Cloud: vom Buzzword zur prüfbaren Realität]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Das neue EU Cloud Sovereignty Framework ermöglicht eine objektive Bewertung von Cloud-Angeboten. Wir analysieren, wie Hyperscaler dabei abschneiden.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685479/it-nachrichten/heise-digitale-souveraenitaet-in-der-cloud-vom-buzzword-zur-pruefbaren-realitaet/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685479/it-nachrichten/heise-digitale-souveraenitaet-in-der-cloud-vom-buzzword-zur-pruefbaren-realitaet/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:06:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Das neue EU Cloud Sovereignty Framework ermöglicht eine objektive Bewertung von Cloud-Angeboten. Wir analysieren, wie Hyperscaler dabei abschneiden.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI's models broke containment and cyberattacked Hugging Face — what enterprises need to know]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Yesterday afternoon, OpenAI and Hugging Face published a joint disclosure outlining a cybersecurity event that redefines the threat landscape for enterprise technology. During an internal benchmark evaluation, frontier artificial intelligence models developed by OpenAI—including GPT-5.6 Sol and a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685286/it-nachrichten/openais-models-broke-containment-and-cyberattacked-hugging-face-what-enterprises-need-to-know/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685286/it-nachrichten/openais-models-broke-containment-and-cyberattacked-hugging-face-what-enterprises-need-to-know/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 07:02:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday afternoon, OpenAI and Hugging Face <a href="https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-model-evaluation-security-incident/">published a joint disclosure</a> outlining a cybersecurity event that redefines the threat landscape for enterprise technology. </p><p>During an internal benchmark evaluation, frontier artificial intelligence models developed by OpenAI—including GPT-5.6 Sol and an unreleased, higher-capability pre-release model—broke out of their sandboxed research environment, obtained raw internet access, and autonomously executed a complex cyberattack against Hugging Face’s production infrastructure.</p><p> OpenAI officially categorizes the breach as an "unprecedented cyber incident, involving state-of-the-art cyber capabilities". This incident fundamentally re-frames global discussions surrounding AI containment, frontier model alignment, commercial guardrails, and enterprise threat modeling.</p><p>But first thing's first: enterprises should understand the situation, evaluate their own AI and computer systems in light of it, and above all, don't panic. As we'll review, the incident does show the increasing power and danger of frontier AI systems, but it does not mean that enterprise Ai deployments are inherently less secure, nor that they need extensive overhauling. </p><h2><b>Anatomy of an Autonomous Breakout</b></h2><p>To understand how a routine benchmark evaluation escalated into a cross-infrastructure breach, one must examine the objective mechanics of the evaluation pipeline. </p><p>The models were prompted to solve <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11086">ExploitGym</a>, a benchmark designed to quantify multi-step exploitation capabilities. </p><p>Hyper-focused on maximizing its evaluation score, the AI agent inferred that Hugging Face likely hosted the answer keys and benchmark solutions. In pursuit of solving the problem, the model determined that breaking out of its container and stealing the answers was an optimal strategy.</p><p>OpenAI’s evaluation environment is designed to be strictly isolated, limiting network traffic through a proxy used for package caching. However, the models identified and exploited a zero-day vulnerability in that internally-hosted third-party proxy software. </p><p>Once through, the AI executed a series of lateral movement and privilege escalation actions across OpenAI's research nodes until reaching a machine with unrestricted internet access. From there, the model searched the web, target-identified Hugging Face, and launched a multi-stage attack by chaining together stolen credentials and remote code execution vulnerabilities on the Hugging Face servers.</p><p>The UK AI Security Institute (UK AISI) recently evaluated models such as GPT-5.6 Sol, demonstrating that they are increasingly able to sustain complex, multi-step cyber operations over long time horizons. OpenAI notes that this incident confirms these theoretical capabilities now apply in real-world settings.</p><h2><b>Rewinding the Tape on a Forensic Trap</b></h2><p>While OpenAI’s July 21 release reveals the identity of the autonomous agent, Hugging Face had already begun managing the intrusion days earlier. </p><p>On July 16, Hugging Face disclosed that an autonomous AI agent system breached its production infrastructure. As <a href="https://venturebeat.com/security/safety-guardrails-blocked-hugging-faces-defenders-not-the-attacker-when-an-ai-agent-breached-its-systems">detailed by VentureBeat,</a> the attacker’s entry point was a malicious dataset that triggered code execution through a remote-code loader and template-injection flaws within dataset configuration files. </p><p>Once inside, the agent framework broke out onto the node running the workload and executed thousands of actions via short-lived sandboxes, harvesting cloud and cluster credentials over a single weekend.</p><p>When Hugging Face's security team detected the breach, responders immediately turned to frontier AI models via commercial APIs to parse the massive volume of system logs and reconstruct over 17,000 recorded events. Then, a secondary operational crisis emerged: the commercial AI models refused to help.</p><p>Because standard commercial frontier models utilize unified safety guardrails designed to block malicious prompt submissions, the models classified the incident response team's forensic queries—which contained raw shell commands, real exploit payloads, and credential dumps—as malicious attacks. Every forensic query submitted by the defenders was blocked outright.</p><p>"The same prompts that are most valuable during an active intrusion—shell commands, exploit chains, credential dumps, persistence mechanisms, lateral movement—are exactly the prompts most likely to trigger safety systems," notes Merritt Baer, former Deputy CISO at AWS and senior adviser to Andesite, G2I, and AppOmni, in an interview with VentureBeat. "As AI becomes embedded in security operations, this becomes an operational resilience issue rather than merely a model policy issue".</p><p>To bypass this roadblock, Hugging Face abandoned commercial hosted APIs and deployed <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/z-ais-open-weights-glm-5-2-beats-gpt-5-5-on-multiple-long-horizon-coding-benchmarks-for-1-6th-the-cost">GLM 5.2</a> —a  state-of-the-art Chinese open-weight model released last month by z.ai, as <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/z-ais-open-weights-glm-5-2-beats-gpt-5-5-on-multiple-long-horizon-coding-benchmarks-for-1-6th-the-cost">reported at the time by VentureBeat</a> —locally on its own infrastructure. </p><p>Free from third-party API restrictions and external safety filters, GLM 5.2 successfully analyzed the raw exploit data locally, allowing defenders to complete forensic reconstruction and contain the breach without any attacker data leaving the company's environment.</p><h2><b>Industry Reaction and the Geopolitical Paradox</b></h2><p>The revelation that an American frontier model autonomously escaped containment, attacked a partner platform, and was ultimately analyzed using a Chinese open-weight model sent shockwaves through the tech community. </p><p><i>The Wall Street Journal </i>summarized the <a href="https://x.com/WSJ/status/2079754070965854541?s=20">public reaction on X,</a> calling the event "the stuff of cybersecurity nightmares. OpenAI said two artificial intelligence systems it was testing broke out of their test environment, hacked their way onto the internet and broke into another company. The victim was Hugging Face."</p><p>Also posting to X, AI alignment researcher <a href="https://x.com/justanotherlaw/status/2079756943112159237">Lawrence Chan</a> emphasized the importance of transparency regarding the incident, noting that "Credit where it’s due: Hugging Face detected and disclosed the intrusion last week. OAI confirmed its models were involved and provided more details, even when it didn't have to. Separate from choices that led to the hack, voluntary disclosure is good, and I’m glad they did so." </p><p>Meanwhile, AI researcher <a href="https://x.com/natolambert/status/2079662928941474201?s=20">Nathan Lambert</a> provided a succinct technical summary in his own X post, observing that "An openai model, during evaluation on a cyber benchmark, exploited a public zero day bug, escaped sandboxing in openai's infra, and got into the internal huggingface infra via an exploit (through a public dataset service) all in the attempt to solve a benchmark problem." He later addressed the geopolitical implications, writing in another post on X: </p><blockquote><p><i>"Rght now American companies need Chinese models to secure their cyber infra due to guardrails on closed models.</i></p><p><i>But if a Chinese model in training had infiltrated a prominent American tech company, it very likely could've been the cause of policy banning future Chinese models."</i></p></blockquote><p>Technology investor <a href="https://x.com/DavidSacks/status/2078991100057141620?s=20">David Sacks also zeroed in</a> on the guardrail paradox, writing in his own X post that "Hugging Face tried using American frontier models to analyze an AI-powered cyber attack. But the guardrails blocked requests containing real exploit payloads so they switched to GLM 5.2 running locally. The guardrails actually impaired defensive security." </p><p>Sacks quote tweeted<a href="https://x.com/ClementDelangue/status/2078987852495364398"> Hugging Face CEO Clem Delangue</a>, who wrote: "We had this experience ourselves this week! Very scary to be guardrailed as a defender when you know attackers are likely bypassing".</p><h2><b>5 Strategic Takeaways for Enterprise Tech Leaders Now</b></h2><p>For the average enterprise executive, the central question is immediate: is our corporate network at risk from escaping AI agents? The short answer is no, not inherently.</p><p><b>1. Hugging Face occupies a unique position in the software ecosystem. </b>As a global repository for open-source AI models, code, and datasets, Hugging Face natively attracts autonomous agents, scrapers, automated evaluation pipelines, and active security researchers. Furthermore, the model’s target selection was context-specific: GPT-5.6 Sol searched for Hugging Face specifically because it deduced that Hugging Face hosted the answers to <i>ExploitGym</i>. Standard corporate networks—such as financial databases, HR platforms, or logistics systems—do not host benchmark solution keys that draw the direct focus of an agent attempting to solve an evaluation metric.</p><p><b>2. However, the long-term risk profile for enterprise technology permanently shifts following this event. </b>AI models with long-horizon reasoning seek the path of least resistance to accomplish a goal, including breaking rules, escaping sandboxes, or exploiting zero-days if deployment safeguards are intentionally disabled for testing or bypassed by an attacker. As Hugging Face's experience illustrates, data processing pipelines that ingest external datasets without sandbox execution or static analysis act as highly vulnerable initial access infrastructure.</p><p><b>3. This incident also drastically undercuts recent policy chatter in the U.S. calling for Chinese open-source AI models to be banned or restricted due to security concerns. </b>As this episode demonstrates, an open-weight Chinese model actually served as the vital defensive layer for an American and French firm facing an unanticipated cyberattack from an American model that broke containment. Contrary to the official line from some U.S. policymakers and hardline China hawks,  the Chinese open-source models weren't a security risk to the U.S. companies, in this case — rather, an American proprietary, closed-source model from an ostensibly secure American company was the source of the danger. Thus, any pressure U.S. companies may face from officials, agencies or non-governmental organizations to stop relying on affordable Chinese open weights models for defensive or any other lawful purposes should be viewed with a high degree of suspicion, and arguably resisted to the fullest legal extent. </p><p><b>4. Enterprise CISOs must audit their dependency on cloud-based AI APIs and pressure vendors to implement authenticated trust architectures</b>. Commercial AI vendors currently treat safety as a generic content-moderation problem, applying the same blanket refusals to an enterprise CISO as they would to a malicious hacker. Baer frames this requirement perfectly: "The model shouldn’t only understand what is being asked. It should understand who is asking, why, and under what governance".</p><p><b>5. Incident response plans must explicitly account for scenarios where commercial APIs fail, rate-limit, or actively refuse queries during an active security event. </b>Maintaining air-gapped, locally deployed open-weight models trained on security log analysis is no longer an edge-case luxury; it is a critical operational requirement. Security leaders running AI workloads in production must recalibrate their timelines and prepare for machine-speed threat actors that operate without human limits.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[FAQ Claude Mythos: Fähigkeiten, Zugang, Wettbewerber, Auswirkungen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Claude Mythos steht immer mehr Unternehmen testweise zur Verfügung. Doch was genau steckt in Anthropics neuestem Modell?T. Schneider / Shutterstock



Was ist Claude Mythos?



Claude Mythos ist ein KI-Modell, das von Anthropic entwickelt wurde und für Anwendungen in den Bereichen Cybersicherheit...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685218/it-security-nachrichten/faq-claude-mythos-faehigkeiten-zugang-wettbewerber-auswirkungen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685218/it-security-nachrichten/faq-claude-mythos-faehigkeiten-zugang-wettbewerber-auswirkungen/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 06:10:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/shutterstock_editorial_2338803257.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1024" alt="Anthropic and Claude" class="wp-image-2096337" width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><p>Claude Mythos steht immer mehr Unternehmen testweise zur Verfügung. Doch was genau steckt in Anthropics neuestem Modell?</p></figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">T. Schneider / Shutterstock</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Was ist Claude Mythos?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Claude Mythos ist ein KI-Modell, das von Anthropic entwickelt wurde und für Anwendungen in den Bereichen Cybersicherheit und Gesundheitswesen optimiert ist. Ursprünglich wurde Mythos 5 im April einer kleinen Gruppe geprüfter Technologiepartner zugänglich gemacht – im Vorfeld eines geplanten, breiter angelegten Rollouts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zu diesem Zweck rief das KI-Unternehmen das <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4156536/wie-claude-mythos-die-it-sicherheit-veraendert.html">Projekt „Glasswing“</a> ins Leben, ein Konsortium, das Infrastrukturanbietern, Open-Source-Entwicklern und großen Technologieunternehmen einen begrenzten, kontrollierten Zugriff zu Mythos gewährt. Ziel der Initiative ist es, Verteidigern zu ermöglichen, Schwachstellen schneller aufzuspüren und zu beheben, als Angreifer sie identifizieren können. Das erscheint auch dringend notwendig, setzen diese doch zunehmend selbst auf <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4193820/ki-fuhrt-eigenstandig-cyber-attacken-aus.html">KI-gestützte Werkzeuge</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Über welche Fähigkeiten verfügt Claude Mythos?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die ersten 50 Partner von Project Glasswing konnten mithilfe von Mythos mehr als 10.000 Schwachstellen mit hohem oder kritischem Schweregrad in allen gängigen Betriebssystemen und Webbrowsern aufspüren.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So identifizierte das Modell Sicherheitslücken, die selbst den fähigsten Sicherheitsforschern jahrelang entgangen waren – etwa einen 27 Jahre alten Fehler in OpenBSD. Zudem hat Mythos bewiesen, dass es mehrere Schwachstellen miteinander verknüpfen kann.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Wie schränkt Anthropic den Zugang zu Claude Mythos ein?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anthropic teilte bei der Vorstellung von Claude Mythos mit, es schränke die Verfügbarkeit des Spitzen-KI-Modells bewusst ein, da dessen Fähigkeiten von Angreifern leicht missbraucht werden könnten.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Im Juni wurde die Technologie dann für weitere 150 Organisationen freigegeben. Alle Mythos-Partner müssen hierbei aber zustimmen, dass ihre Daten 30 Tage lang zu Sicherheitsüberwachungszwecken gespeichert werden.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Am 15. Juni verhängte die Trump-Regierung allerdings Exportbeschränkungen für <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4183094/anthropic-releases-mythos-class-fable-5-model-with-safeguards-for-cyber-risks.html" target="_blank">Claude Fable 5</a> und Claude Mythos 5. Diese sollten ausländischen Staatsangehörigen sowohl innerhalb als auch außerhalb der USA den Zugang verwehren. Am 30. Juni wurden die Beschränkungen jedoch bereits wieder aufgehoben.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Was ist Claude Fable?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Für einen breiteren Einsatzbereich bietet Anthropic Claude Fable 5 an. Das Modell basiert auf derselben technischen Grundlage wie Mythos. Es verfügt jedoch über strenge Sicherheitsmechanismen, die den Betrieb in als „riskant“ eingestuften Bereichen der Cybersicherheit einschränken. Alle als problematisch deklarierten Anfragen werden stattdessen automatisch an das ältere und weniger leistungsfähige Large Language Model (LLM) Opus 4.8 weitergeleitet.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Wie nutzen Security-Partner von Anthropic den Zugriff auf Mythos?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cisco, einer der Projekt-Glasswing-Partner, hat seine „<a href="https://blogs.cisco.com/ai/announcing-foundry-security-spec" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Foundry Security Spec</a>“ als Open-Source-Lösung veröffentlicht. Hierbei handelt es sich um ein modellunabhängiges Framework für Sicherheitstests, das es anderen Anbietern und Sicherheitsexperten in Unternehmen ermöglichen soll, ähnliche Arbeitsabläufe zu entwickeln, ohne bei Null anfangen zu müssen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Vor kurzem betonten Vertreter von Cisco auf einer Online-Veranstaltung, dass Verteidiger KI nutzen können, um Sicherheitsprobleme wesentlich schneller und in größerem Umfang zu identifizieren, zu bestätigen und zu beheben. Ältere Modelle, die nach dem Prinzip „eine Schwachstelle finden und patchen“ funktionieren, seien nicht mehr zeitgemäß. Dies liege daran, dass Angreifer KI einsetzen, um den Weg von der Entdeckung einer Schwachstelle bis zu deren Ausnutzung zu beschleunigen. Cisco wiederum setzt KI intern bereits in der Defensive ein, um 1,8 Milliarden Zeilen Code im gesamten Produktportfolio zu scannen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gleichzeitig betonen die Experten, dass kleinere Unternehmen keinen Zugriff auf eingeschränkte KI-Modelle benötigen, um ihre Sicherheit zu verbessern. In solchen Betrieben lasse sich stattdessen mehr erreichen, indem grundlegende Sicherheitsmaßnahmen optimiert werden. Hierzu zählen laut Cisco unter anderem Authentifizierung, Netzwerk-Segmentierung, Zero Trust und die Behebung aktiv ausgenutzter Schwachstellen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Bieten andere KI-Anbieter etwas Vergleichbares zu Claude Mythos an?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mythos ist das prominenteste Beispiel für Frontier-KI-Modelle. Mit ihnen kann die Suche nach Zero-Day-Lücken in einem Tempo und Ausmaß automatisiert werden, die weit über die Fähigkeiten menschlicher Teams hinausgeht.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Allerdings arbeiten auch etliche andere Anbieter an hochleistungsfähigen, auf Sicherheit ausgerichteten „Frontier“-KI-Modellen. Zudem gibt es andere leistungsstarke Open-Source-Modelle, die sich problemlos für die Cybersicherheitsforschung nutzen lassen. Claude Mythos ist also bei weitem nicht die einzige verfügbare Option.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So werden beispielsweise die Modelle GPT-5.4-Cyber sowie GPT-5.5 von OpenAI genutzt, um Schwachstellen zu erkennen und zu analysieren. Auch in der Malware-Analyse und der Bedrohungsmodellierung kommen sie zum Einsatz. Zugang zu diesen Technologien können Sicherheitsanbieter, Unternehmen und Forscher über das Programm „Trusted Access for Cyber“ (TAC) von OpenAI erhalten.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zusätzlich hat das chinesische <a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/chinas-360-says-it-has-developed-tools-match-anthropics-mythos-2026-06-24/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Cybersicherheitsunternehmen 360 Security Technology mit Tulongfeng</a> ein System entwickelt, das als Gegenstück zu Anthropics „Mythos“ beschrieben wird.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Privat lassen sich leistungsstarke offene Modelle – darunter DeepSeek V3.2 von DeepSeek und Llama 4 von Meta – auf GPU-Infrastrukturen betreiben und in der Cybersicherheitsforschung einsetzen. Fugu des japanischen Anbieters Sakana AI ist eine weitere Option in dieser Kategorie.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Was kritisieren Cybersicherheitsexperten an Claude Mythos?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Kritiker aus dem Cybersecurity-Bereich räumen ein, dass Claude Mythos zweifellos hochentwickelt sei. Die Marketing-Behauptung, wonach es zuverlässig produktive IT-Systeme lahmlegen könne, übersteige jedoch die tatsächlichen Fähigkeiten.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Darüber hinaus beklagen sich Sicherheitsexperten – <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mx0CpTp3Q4Y" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">etwa in Podcasts</a> – über die übertrieben restriktiven Sicherheitsmechanismen von Claude Fable: Bereits Anfragen, einen sicherheitsrelevanten Blogbeitrag zusammenzufassen oder sogar das Wort „Exploit“ zu buchstabieren, würden auf das deutlich schwächere Modell Opus 4.8 zurückgestuft. Dadurch würden selbst alltägliche Aufgaben in der Informationssicherheit unnötig erschwert.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Andere Experten warnen davor, dass Frontier-KI-Modelle anfällig für False Positives seien. Eher grundsätzlich ist die Kritik, dass das schnellere Aufspüren von mehr Schwachstellen das eigentliche Problem nicht löst, nämlich zuverlässig Sicherheitslücken zu beheben oder nicht-technische Angriffsvektoren wie Social Engineering zu verhindern.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Wie sollten CISOs auf Mythos reagieren?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Nachrichtendienste der „Five Eyes“ (USA, Großbritannien, Kanada, Australien und Neuseeland) <a href="https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2026-06/Five-Eyes-cyber-security-agencies-statement-ai-shift.pdf"></a> warnen davor, dass hochmoderne KI-Modelle wie Claude Mythos „sowohl offensive als auch defensive Cyber-Fähigkeiten grundlegend verändern werden“ – und zwar in einem Zeitraum von Monaten statt Jahren.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">„Während KI uns dabei helfen wird, die Cyberabwehr im Laufe der Zeit zu verbessern, erhöht sie zugleich Geschwindigkeit, Ausmaß und Raffinesse von Cyberbedrohungen“, heißt es in der Erklärung der Gruppe. Unternehmen sollen daher KI nutzen, um ihre Abwehrmechanismen im Rahmen umfassenderer Strategien zur Stärkung der Cybersicherheits-Resilienz zu verbessern.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die meisten Unternehmen seien jedoch bei weitem noch nicht darauf vorbereitet, was dies für ihre Bedrohungsmodelle bedeutet, warnt ein Experte. „Wir verfügen heute über KI-Systeme, die realistische Angriffswege über Software, Anbieter und kritische Infrastrukturen hinweg schneller abbilden können, als menschliche Angreifer sie erfassen können“, erläutert <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jhubback/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Joe Hubback</a>, Partner und CISO beim Beratungsunternehmen Elixirr sowie ehemaliger McKinsey-Partner. Dadurch, dass „Fähigkeiten der ‚Mythos-Klasse‘ vor der breiten kommerziellen Einführung stünden, handle es sich nicht mehr um „ein Nischenproblem der Forschung“, ergänzt er. Vielmehr sei es jetzt ein Faktor, den jedes Unternehmen in sein Bedrohungsmodell einbeziehen müsse, so der Experte.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Auch ein <a href="https://labs.cloudsecurityalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/mythosready-20260413.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bericht der Cloud Security Alliance</a> warnt davor, dass KI die Zeitspanne zwischen der Entdeckung einer Schwachstelle und deren Ausnutzung drastisch verkürzt habe. Damit seien herkömmliche Sicherheitsmodelle, die auf „Patchen und Reagieren“ basieren, überholt. Unternehmen sollten sich vielmehr auf anhaltende Wellen von Schwachstellen einstellen, die durch „Project Glasswing“ und andere Quellen mittels KI aufgedeckt werden.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">„Die bei Mythos beobachteten Fähigkeiten werden schon bald breiter verfügbar sein. Dadurch wird sich die Anzahl sowie Häufigkeit komplexer, neuartiger Angriffe, denen sich Unternehmen gegenübersehen, drastisch erhöhen“, heißt es in der Warnung. Sicherheitsverantwortliche müssten daher ihre Verteidigungsstrategien auf einen „Mythos-ready“-Ansatz umstellen, der auf kontinuierlichem Schwachstellenmanagement, schnellerer Priorisierung und verbesserter Reaktion auf Sicherheitsvorfälle basiert. (tf)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dieser Artikel basiert auf einem <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4198019/claude-mythos-faq-capabilities-access-competitors-implications.html" target="_blank">Beitrag</a> von CSO.</strong></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Tools, um MCP-Server abzusichern]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px">Unabhängig davon, welche MCP-Server Unternehmen wofür einsetzen – “Unsicherheiten” sollten dabei außenvorbleiben.Gorodenkoff | shutterstock.com



Model Context Protocol (MCP) verbindet KI-Agenten mit Datenquellen und erfre...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3685216/it-security-nachrichten/tools-um-mcp-server-abzusichern/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3685216/it-security-nachrichten/tools-um-mcp-server-abzusichern/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 06:10:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized"> width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"&gt;<figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Unabhängig davon, welche MCP-Server Unternehmen wofür einsetzen – “Unsicherheiten” sollten dabei außenvorbleiben.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Gorodenkoff | shutterstock.com</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Model Context Protocol (<a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4031227/was-ist-model-context-protocol.html" target="_blank">MCP</a>) verbindet KI-Agenten mit Datenquellen und erfreut sich im Unternehmensumfeld wachsender Beliebtheit. Allerdings ist auch MCP nicht frei von Sicherheitslücken, wie entsprechende Entdeckungen, etwa beim SaaS-Anbieter <a href="https://www.upguard.com/blog/asana-discloses-data-exposure-bug-in-mcp-server" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Asana</a> oder dem IT-Riesen <a href="https://www.catonetworks.com/blog/cato-ctrl-poc-attack-targeting-atlassians-mcp/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Atlassian</a> gezeigt haben. Inzwischen hat sich jedoch einiges in Sachen MCP-Sicherheit getan. Einerseits wurden mit Blick auf das Kernprotokoll etliche Fortschritte erzielt. Beispielsweise in Form von Support für OAuth sowie für Authentifizierungs-Server von Drittanbietern und Identity-Management-Systeme. Darüber hinaus wurde inzwischen auch eine <a href="https://modelcontextprotocol.info/tools/registry/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">offizielle MCP Registry</a> geschaffen, die einen Überblick über sichere, öffentlich verfügbare MCP-Server bietet.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dennoch bestehen weiterhin Sicherheitslücken, die sich für diverse Cyberschandtaten ausnutzen lassen – <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4044551/wenn-der-ki-agent-im-fakeshop-kauft.html" target="_blank">Prompt Injection</a>, Tool Poisoning, Token-Diebstahl, Server-übergreifende Attacken oder manipulierte Messages sind nur einige von vielen Beispielen. Mit anderen Worten: Unternehmen, die sich beim <a href="https://www.computerwoche.de/article/4049237/3-tipps-um-agentic-ai-systeme-in-der-cloud-zu-entwickeln.html" target="_blank">Aufbau von Agentic-AI-Systemen</a> einen Wettbewerbsvorteil verschaffen wollen, müssen erhebliche Anstrengungen unternehmen, um zu gewährleisten, dass sensible Daten nicht nach außen dringen. Glücklicherweise gibt es diverse Tools, die dabei Unterstützung versprechen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In diesem Artikel lesen Sie:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>was Security-Tools für MCP leisten sollten, und</li>



<li>welche Angebote in diesem Bereich interessant sind.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Das sollten MCP-Sicherheitslösungen können</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Gefahr von Datenlecks, Prompt Injections und weiteren Sicherheitsbedrohungen besteht unabhängig davon, ob Unternehmen:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>ihre eigenen KI-Agenten mit MCP-Servern von Drittanbietern,</li>



<li>ihre eigenen MCP-Server mit Drittanbieter-Agenten, oder</li>



<li>ihre eigenen Server mit den eigenen Agenten verbinden.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Soll heißen: Unternehmen müssen in jedem Fall Autorisierungen und Berechtigungen überprüfen, detaillierte Zugriffskontrollen implementieren und alles protokollieren. Daraus ergeben sich auch die Anforderungen für MCP-Sicherheitslösungen. Diese sollten bieten:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>MCP-Servererkennung.</strong> Für Mitarbeiter eines Unternehmens ist es einfach, MCP-Server herunterzuladen und zu nutzen. Mit Scan-Services für MCP-Server können Unternehmen sämtliche Instanzen von Schatten-MCP-Servern in ihrer Umgebung finden.</li>



<li><strong>Laufzeitschutz.</strong> KI-Agenten kommunizieren mit MCP-Servern in natürlicher Sprache. MCP-Sicherheits-Tools sollten deshalb in der Lage sein, diese Kommunikation auf Sicherheitsprobleme wie Prompt Injections hin zu überwachen.</li>



<li><strong>Authentifizierungs- und Zugriffskontrollen.</strong> Das MCP-Protokoll unterstützt inzwischen OAuth, aber das ist nur ein erster Schritt. Für zusätzliche Sicherheit empfehlen sich Tools mit integrierten Kontroll-Frameworks für Zero Trust und Least Privilege.</li>



<li><strong>Logging und Observability.</strong> Tools und Plattformen sollten zudem die Möglichkeit bieten, MCP-Protokolle zu sammeln, Sicherheitsteams über Richtlinienverstöße zu informieren, Compliance-Daten zu erfassen oder Protokolle in die bestehende Sicherheitsinfrastruktur einzuspeisen.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">MCP-Security-Angebote</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Im Folgenden haben wir die Anbieter von MCP-Security-Tools in drei Kategorien aufgeteilt. Diese Aufstellung erhebt keinen Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Hyperscaler</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Für Unternehmen, die sich vollständig auf eine bestimmte Cloud-Plattform verlassen, bieten die MCP-Tools des jeweiligen Hyperscalers einen einfachen Einstieg.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Amazon Web Services (AWS)</strong> hat Mitte 2025 seine eigene agentenbasierte KI-Plattform eingeführt. <a href="https://aws.amazon.com/de/bedrock/agentcore/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Amazon Bedrock AgentCore</a> umfasst ein Gateway, das mehrere Protokolle unterstützt (darunter auch MCP), ein Identity-Management-System sowie Observability.</li>



<li><strong>Microsoft</strong> bietet einen grundlegenden <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/de-de/azure/developer/azure-mcp-server/overview" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Azure-MCP-Server</a> an, inklusive Support für Azure Key Vault. Darüber hinaus unterstützen auch Azure AI Foundry Agent Service und Azure API Management das Model Context Protocol. Zudem bietet Microsoft mit dem <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/de-de/agent-framework/overview/agent-framework-overview" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Agent Framework</a> auch ein Open-Source-Entwicklungskit, das sowohl MCP als auch Agent2Agent unterstützt und beispielsweise Schutz vor Prompt Injections verspricht.</li>



<li><strong>Google Cloud</strong> kündigte Anfang 2025 seine <a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/ai-machine-learning/mcp-toolbox-for-databases-now-supports-model-context-protocol?hl=en" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MCP Toolbox für Datenbanken</a> an – inklusive integrierter Authentifizierung und Observability. Außerdem hat der Hyperscaler auch <a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/how-to-secure-your-remote-mcp-server-on-google-cloud?hl=en" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">eine Referenzarchitektur</a> veröffentlicht, um MCP-Server auf seiner Cloud-Plattform abzusichern.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Große Plattformanbieter</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Der IT-Dienstleister <strong>Cloudflare</strong> hat mit <a href="https://blog.cloudflare.com/zero-trust-mcp-server-portals/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MCP Server Portals</a> ein Tool veröffentlicht, mit dem Unternehmen MCP-Verbindungen zentralisiert absichern und überwachen können. Die Funktion ist Bestandteil der Cloudflare-One-Plattform.</li>



<li><strong>Palo Alto Networks</strong> hat mit Blick auf MCP-Sicherheit mehrere Eisen im Feuer. Mit <a href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/blog/2025/06/securing-ai-agent-innovation-prisma-airs-mcp-server/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Prisma AIRS</a> hat das Unternehmen einen eigenen, intermediären MCP-Server veröffentlicht. Dieser sitzt zwischen den KI-Agenten und dem eigentlichen MCP-Server und erkennt schadhafte Inhalte und Daten. Das Tool <a href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/blog/2025/06/cloud-security-model-context-protocol-mcp-security/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MCP Security</a> ist hingegen Bestandteil von Cortex Cloud WAAS und überprüft die MCP-Kommunikation an der Netzwerkgrenze auf bösartige Aktivitäten.</li>



<li><strong>SentinelOne</strong> gewährt mit seiner <a href="https://www.sentinelone.com/blog/avoiding-mcp-mania-how-to-secure-the-next-frontier-of-ai/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Singularity Platform</a> ebenfalls Einblick in die MCP-Interaktionskette und bietet zum Beispiel Warnmeldungen und automatisierte Incident Response für MCP-Server auf lokaler oder Remote-Ebene.</li>



<li>Die <a href="https://acuvity.ai/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Plattform</a> von <strong>Acuvity</strong> (seit Februar 2026 Teil von <strong>Proofpoint</strong>) verspricht, MCP-Server umfassend abzusichern. Dafür sorgt laut dem Anbieter eine Kombination aus Least-Privilege-Execution, unveränderlichen Laufzeiten, kontinuierlichen Schwachstellenscans, Authentifizierung und Bedrohungserkennung.</li>



<li>Daneben hat auch <strong>Broadcom</strong> MCP-Sicherheitsfunktionen für VMware Cloud Foundation <a href="https://www.broadcom.com/company/news/product-releases/63401" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">angekündigt</a>, die künftig mehr Sicherheit für agentenbasierte Workflows gewährleisten sollen.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Startups</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Das API-Security-Startup <strong>Akto</strong> hat eine <a href="https://www.akto.io/mcp-security" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MCP-Security-Plattform</a> im Angebot. Sie umfasst ein Discovery Tool, um MCP-Server in Unternehmensumgebungen zu identifizieren, Security-Testing-Werkzeuge sowie Monitoring- und Threat-Detection-Funktionen.</li>



<li><strong>Invariant Labs</strong> bietet mit <a href="https://github.com/invariantlabs-ai/mcp-scan" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MCP-Scan</a> ein quelloffenes Tool, das die statische Analyse und Echtzeitüberwachung von MCP-Servern ermöglicht. Mit <a href="https://invariantlabs.ai/blog/guardrails" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Guardrails</a> hat das Startup auch ein kommerzielles Produkt im Angebot. Dabei handelt es sich um einen Proxy. Der zwischen KI-Agenten und MCP-Servern sitzt und vor Security-Risiken schützen soll. Das Tool befähigt Anwender außerdem dazu, Richtlinien aufzusetzen.</li>



<li><strong>Highflame </strong>(vormals Javelin) <a href="https://www.highflame.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">addressiert</a> ebenfalls das Thema MCP-Sicherheit. Etwa mit Funktionen wie MCP-Server auf Risiken zu scannen oder Datenanfragen zu überprüfen.  </li>



<li><strong>Lasso Security</strong> stellt ein Open-Source-<a href="https://github.com/lasso-security/mcp-gateway" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">MCP-Gateway</a> zur Verfügung, das die Konfiguration und das Lebenszyklusmanagement von MCP-Servern ermöglicht und Messages um sensible Informationen bereinigt.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(fm)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Dieser Artikel ist <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4087656/what-cisos-need-to-know-about-new-tools-for-securing-mcp-servers.html" target="_blank">im Original</a> bei unser Schwesterpublikation CSOonline.com erschienen.</strong></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Desktop+ Lockscreen Animated Wallpaper Fully RE of WallpaperExtensionKit.framework private apis (Still Buggy)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[submitted by    /u/KepcukTheGreat   [link]   [comments]]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684977/reverse-engineering/desktop-lockscreen-animated-wallpaper-fully-re-of-wallpaperextensionkitframework-private-apis-still-buggy/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684977/reverse-engineering/desktop-lockscreen-animated-wallpaper-fully-re-of-wallpaperextensionkitframework-private-apis-still-buggy/</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 01:04:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Reverse Engineering</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[  submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/KepcukTheGreat"> /u/KepcukTheGreat </a> <br> <span><a href="https://github.com/Stallion77RepoOfficial/Livecore">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ReverseEngineering/comments/1v2enmx/desktop_lockscreen_animated_wallpaper_fully_re_of/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google's Gemini 3.6 Flash model cuts AI agent token costs by up to 65% on long horizon engineering tasks —and 3.5 Pro is on the way]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google DeepMind today released three new proprietary AI models it says are among its most token-efficient yet: Gemini 3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber. The models aim to make AI agents faster, smarter, and cheaper at scale. Google is pricing Gemini 3.6 Flash at $1.50 p...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684881/it-nachrichten/googles-gemini-36-flash-model-cuts-ai-agent-token-costs-by-up-to-65-on-long-horizon-engineering-tasks-and-35-pro-is-on-the-way/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684881/it-nachrichten/googles-gemini-36-flash-model-cuts-ai-agent-token-costs-by-up-to-65-on-long-horizon-engineering-tasks-and-35-pro-is-on-the-way/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 23:33:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google DeepMind<a href="https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/gemini-3-6-flash-3-5-flash-lite-3-5-flash-cyber/?utm_source=x&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=&amp;utm_content="> today released three new proprietary AI models</a> it says are among its most token-efficient yet: Gemini 3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber. </p><p>The models aim to make AI agents faster, smarter, and cheaper at scale. Google is pricing Gemini 3.6 Flash at $1.50 per one million input tokens and $7.50 per one million output tokens through its application programming interface (API), while Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs a staggeringly cheap $0.30/$2.50 per million tokens in/out. </p><p>Compare that to the $1.50/$9.00 per 1M tokens for Gemini 3.5 Flash, and the $2/$12 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, and the savings are considerable. However, Google's prior generation Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite still remains the search giant's "most cost-efficient" model at $0.25/$1.50 per 1M tokens. Yet, it remains 2X slower than the new, more expensive Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, giving those enterprises who value speed more "bang" for their buck. </p><h2><b>VB Frontier AI Model API Pricing Comparison Chart (Late July 2026 Shortlist)</b></h2><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Model</b></p></td><td><p><b>Input ($/1M)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Output ($/1M)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Total ($/1M)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Source</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5 Flash</p></td><td><p>$0.10</p></td><td><p>$0.30</p></td><td><p>$0.40</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>deepseek-v4-flash</p></td><td><p>$0.14</p></td><td><p>$0.28</p></td><td><p>$0.42</p></td><td><p><a href="https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing">DeepSeek</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>deepseek-v4-pro</p></td><td><p>$0.435</p></td><td><p>$0.87</p></td><td><p>$1.305</p></td><td><p><a href="https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing">DeepSeek</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiniMax-M3</p></td><td><p>$0.30</p></td><td><p>$1.20</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.minimax.io/subscribe/token-plan?tab=api-enterprise">MiniMax</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>LongCat-2.0 — limited-time promo</p></td><td><p>$0.30</p></td><td><p>$1.20</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://longcat.chat/platform/docs/APIPayAsYouGo.html">LongCat</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite</p></td><td><p>$0.25</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p>$1.75</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Qwen3.7-Plus</p></td><td><p>$0.40</p></td><td><p>$1.60</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://modelstudio.console.alibabacloud.com/ap-southeast-1?tab=doc#/doc/?type=model&amp;url=2840914_2&amp;modelId=qwen3.7-plus&amp;serviceSite=international">Alibaba Cloud</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5</p></td><td><p>$0.40</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$2.40</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite</b></p></td><td><p><b>$0.30</b></p></td><td><p><b>$2.50</b></p></td><td><p><b>$2.80</b></p></td><td><p><b></b><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing"><b>Google</b></a><b></b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>LongCat-2.0 — standard</p></td><td><p>$0.75</p></td><td><p>$2.95</p></td><td><p>$3.70</p></td><td><p><a href="https://longcat.chat/platform/docs/APIPayAsYouGo.html">LongCat</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5 Pro (≤256K)</p></td><td><p>$1.00</p></td><td><p>$3.00</p></td><td><p>$4.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GLM-5.2</p></td><td><p>$1.40</p></td><td><p>$4.40</p></td><td><p>$5.80</p></td><td><p><a href="https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing">Z.ai</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.6 Luna</p></td><td><p>$1.00</p></td><td><p>$6.00</p></td><td><p>$7.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Grok 4.5</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$6.00</p></td><td><p>$8.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://docs.x.ai/developers/models">xAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5 Pro (&gt;256K)</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$6.00</p></td><td><p>$8.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Gemini 3.6 Flash</b></p></td><td><p><b>$1.50</b></p></td><td><p><b>$7.50</b></p></td><td><p><b>$9.00</b></p></td><td><p><b></b><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing"><b>Google</b></a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Qwen3.7-Max</p></td><td><p>$2.50</p></td><td><p>$7.50</p></td><td><p>$10.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://modelstudio.console.alibabacloud.com/ap-southeast-1?tab=doc#/doc/?type=model&amp;url=2840914_2&amp;modelId=qwen3.7-max&amp;serviceSite=international">Alibaba Cloud</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.5 Flash</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p>$9.00</p></td><td><p>$10.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (≤200K)</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$12.00</p></td><td><p>$14.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.6 Terra</p></td><td><p>$2.50</p></td><td><p>$15.00</p></td><td><p>$17.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.4</p></td><td><p>$2.50</p></td><td><p>$15.00</p></td><td><p>$17.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/api/pricing/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Kimi K3</p></td><td><p>$3.00</p></td><td><p>$15.00</p></td><td><p>$18.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/pricing/chat-k3">Moonshot AI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (&gt;200K)</p></td><td><p>$4.00</p></td><td><p>$18.00</p></td><td><p>$22.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Claude Opus 4.8</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$25.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing">Anthropic</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.5</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/api/pricing/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.5 Instant (chat-latest)</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/chat-latest">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sakana Fugu Ultra (≤272K)</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://console.sakana.ai/pricing#subscription-plan">Sakana AI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.6 Sol</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Claude Fable 5 / Claude Mythos 5</p></td><td><p>$10.00</p></td><td><p>$50.00</p></td><td><p>$60.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/models/overview">Anthropic</a></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>No price was provided yet for the specialty Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber model, which, as its name would imply, is designed for cybersecurity researchers and red teamers to patch bugs. </p><p>While the prices are among the middle-low end of all major AI models globally, the fact that Google designed them to use less tokens overall also should drive down costs for enterprises beyond what the sticker price shows (since you'll be paying for fewer total tokens at any rate). </p><p>Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite are available immediately through the Gemini API in Google AI Studio and Android Studio, as well as within the consumer Gemini application and Google Search. According to a <a href="https://deepmind.google/blog/introducing-gemini-3-5-flash-cyber/">separate Google blog post</a>, Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber will be available "exclusively available to governments and trusted partners via CodeMender soon" — <a href="https://deepmind.google/blog/introducing-codemender-an-ai-agent-for-code-security/">CodeMender</a> being Google's proprietary AI code bug-fixing agent released last year. </p><p>As with previous Gemini models, these are all proprietary and "closed source," thus, they can only be obtained through Google's official API and that of its partners, as opposed to an open-source license like MIT or Apache 2.0. </p><p>One conspicuous omission noted by developers on X and social media: where is the larger, more powerful, flagship Gemini 3.5 Pro model Google previously alluded would be released this summer? After all, Gemini 3.1 Pro, the prior flagship, <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/google-launches-gemini-3-1-pro-retaking-ai-crown-with-2x-reasoning">debuted back in February 2026</a>, and rivals OpenAI and Anthropic have since released several more generations of flagship updates far more powerful than Google's. </p><p>Google technical staffer Logan Kilpatrick <a href="https://x.com/OfficialLoganK/status/2079592006163349538">responded to one such inquiry on X, writing</a>: "Gemini 3.5 Pro is currently testing with partners and we plan to make it broadly available as soon as it’s ready." </p><p>Google's release signals that the immediate future of AI lies in agentic capabilities—systems that operate autonomously over extended periods. </p><p>If early large language models are akin to massive, fuel-hungry freight trains capable of hauling incredible loads at immense cost, the new Flash series represents a fleet of nimble, hyper-efficient hybrid delivery vans.</p><h2><b>Efficiency gains ranging from 17% to 65% reduced tokens for strong results on third-party benchmarks</b></h2><p>Under the hood, Gemini 3.6 Flash achieves significant efficiency gains. The model reduces output token usage by 17% compared to its predecessor, Gemini 3.5 Flash, according to the <a href="https://x.com/ArtificialAnlys/status/2079596244339707956">Artificial Analysis Index</a> maintained by the independent third-party AI benchmarking group of the same name. </p><p>In specific long-horizon software engineering benchmarks like <a href="https://deepswe.datacurve.ai/">DeepSWE</a>, which measures how well agents complete multi-step engineering tasks from scratch, the token savings reach up to 65%. </p><p>This reduction means the model requires fewer reasoning steps and tool calls to complete the exact same multi-step workflow. Think of token efficiency like fuel economy in a vehicle. </p><p>When an AI model takes a convoluted path to solve a problem, it burns through more computational fuel, driving up the final cost for the developer. By streamlining its internal logic, Gemini 3.6 Flash arrives at the correct answer faster and cheaper.</p><p>While Google's materials did not specify the exact architectural or algorithmic changes used to achieve this token efficiency, they noted that the model "takes fewer reasoning steps and tool calls to accomplish multi-step workflows" and exhibits reduced "verbosity."</p><p>The official model cards released by Google reveal that both <a href="https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/Model-Cards/Gemini-3-6-Flash-Model-Card.pdf">Gemini 3.6 Flash</a> and <a href="https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/Model-Cards/Gemini-3-5-Flash-Lite-Model-Card.pdf">Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite</a> feature a 1-million-token input context window alongside a max output limit of 64,000 tokens, with both models sharing a knowledge cutoff date of March 2026.</p><h2><b>Respectable benchmark performance at low cost</b></h2><p>The technological improvements extend to concrete capabilities. Gemini 3.6 Flash scores 49% on the DeepSWE benchmark, a notable increase from the 37% achieved by version 3.5. </p><p>It also pushes machine learning engineering performance higher, scoring 63.9% on MLE-Bench compared to 49.7% previously. Furthermore, Google integrates computer use as a built-in client-side tool via the Gemini API and Gemini Enterprise, reflecting an OSWorld-Verified score of 83.0%, up from 78.4%. </p><p>The model also tackles knowledge work with greater proficiency, outperforming its predecessor on benchmarks like GDPval-AA v2 by moving from a score of 1349 to 1421.</p><p>To ensure safety amidst these capability upgrades, Google deploys enhanced Frontier Safety safeguards. These protections harden the model against jailbreaks and mitigate risks in Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear domains, as well as cyber offense misuses. </p><p>The engineering team trains the model to minimize refusals for beneficial uses, striking a necessary balance between strict security and practical utility.</p><h2>M<b>odels for low-cost coding, agentic, and cybersecurity use cases — respectively</b></h2><p>Google divided its new offerings into three distinct products tailored for different operational needs. </p><p>Gemini 3.6 Flash serves as the heavy-duty workhorse of the trio. It handles complex coding, intricate knowledge work, and multimodal processing with improved precision. Enterprise customers utilize it for demanding tasks such as complex document parsing, intricate chart and data analysis, and long-form report drafting. </p><p>The model executes complex code migrations using multi-agent orchestration frameworks with lower latency and higher quality than earlier iterations. Furthermore, 3.6 Flash aids in developing photographic texture extractors for 3D workflows using canvas interfaces.</p><p>Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite targets environments where high throughput and absolute minimal latency are non-negotiable. Google designates it as the fastest model in the 3.5 series. </p><p>As measured by Artificial Analysis, the model processes 350 output tokens per second, making it highly effective for agentic search and massive document processing workloads. <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/articles/gemini-3-6-flash-3-5-flash-lite-halving-time">Artificial Analysis notes</a> this is about twice as fast as prior generation model Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.</p><p>Developers can configure 3.5 Flash-Lite to prioritize low-latency execution for high-volume tasks using minimal thinking levels, or engage higher thinking levels to process complex multi-step subagent workloads. </p><p>Despite its lite designation, it outperforms the standard Gemini 3 Flash on several key agentic and coding evaluations, including SWE-Bench Pro, where it scores 54.2% compared to 49.6%, and OSWorld-Verified, scoring 74.0% versus 65.1%. </p><p>The model extracts product features from massive datasets, generates interactive web design concepts, and scales receipt translation seamlessly.</p><p>The third product, Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber, represents a highly specialized deployment. Google fine-tuned this model specifically to find and fix cybersecurity vulnerabilities. It integrates directly with Google's CodeMender agent. </p><p>In practice, multiple 3.5 Flash Cyber agents work concurrently to produce a single, comprehensive vulnerability report, achieving competitive performance at the frontier on the CyberGym benchmark, even getting within range of Anthropic's much-hyped Mythos model.</p><p>Google did not specify an exact numerical cost for 3.5 Flash Cyber, stating only that it is fine-tuned "at a lower price per token than larger models.</p><h2><b>Commercial licensing only</b></h2><p>The licensing framework for the new Gemini models carries profound implications for developers and enterprise users. Google deploys Gemini 3.6 Flash and 3.5 Flash-Lite under a commercial, proprietary API model. Unlike open-source software governed by licenses such as the MIT License or the GNU General Public License, developers do not gain access to the underlying model weights, training data, or source code.</p><p>An MIT or GPL license grants users the freedom to download the codebase, modify the internal architecture, self-host the deployment, and distribute the software infrastructure independently. In contrast, Google's API approach means developers essentially rent access to the intelligence on a strict metered basis. Every prompt and generated response travels through Google's managed servers, incurring a cost based on the strict pricing structure of $1.50 per million input tokens for 3.6 Flash. </p><p>This commercial tethering restricts deployment flexibility. Enterprises cannot air-gap the models entirely on their own local secure hardware without establishing specialized, high-tier enterprise agreements with Google Cloud. Developers remain bound by Google's acceptable use policies, arbitrary rate limits, and network requirements, creating a permanent dependency on Google's infrastructure uptime and terms of service.</p><p>The licensing for Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber proves even more restrictive. Acknowledging the dual-use nature of cybersecurity AI—which attackers can weaponize just as easily as defenders can use it to patch systems—Google is for now making the model only available behind a limited-access pilot program, similar to the trend kicked off by Anthropic's Mythos model with its <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/anthropic-says-its-most-powerful-ai-cyber-model-is-too-dangerous-to-release">Project Glasswing program</a>, and continued by <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/openai-unveils-gpt-5-6-sol-terra-and-luna-models-but-only-accessible-to-limited-preview-partners-for-now-per-us-gov">OpenAI with its staggered rollout for GPT-5.6</a>. </p><p>In this case, Google is making 3.5 Flash Cyber exclusively available to governments and trusted partners. This strict gatekeeping prevents open access, prioritizing systemic security over widespread developer innovation.</p><h2><b>Looking ahead</b></h2><p>Google DeepMind continues to iterate rapidly, but the gap in its product line remains apparent. While the Flash series excels in speed and economy, the industry eagerly awaits the deployment of Gemini 3.5 Pro to gauge Google's absolute frontier capabilities.</p><p>Simultaneously, the company confirms that pre-training for Gemini 4 has already commenced. </p><p>Until the next major flagship release materializes, developers must optimize their systems using the highly efficient, yet purposefully constrained, Flash architecture.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google's Gemini Flash 5.6 model cuts AI agent token costs by up to 65% on long horizon engineering tasks —and 3.5 Pro is on the way]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Google DeepMind today released three new proprietary AI models it says are among its most token-efficient yet: Gemini 3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber. The models aim to make AI agents faster, smarter, and cheaper at scale. Google is pricing Gemini 3.6 Flash at $1.50 p...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684788/it-nachrichten/googles-gemini-flash-56-model-cuts-ai-agent-token-costs-by-up-to-65-on-long-horizon-engineering-tasks-and-35-pro-is-on-the-way/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684788/it-nachrichten/googles-gemini-flash-56-model-cuts-ai-agent-token-costs-by-up-to-65-on-long-horizon-engineering-tasks-and-35-pro-is-on-the-way/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 22:56:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google DeepMind<a href="https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/gemini-3-6-flash-3-5-flash-lite-3-5-flash-cyber/?utm_source=x&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=&amp;utm_content="> today released three new proprietary AI models</a> it says are among its most token-efficient yet: Gemini 3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber. </p><p>The models aim to make AI agents faster, smarter, and cheaper at scale. Google is pricing Gemini 3.6 Flash at $1.50 per one million input tokens and $7.50 per one million output tokens through its application programming interface (API), while Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs a staggeringly cheap $0.30/$2.50 per million tokens in/out. </p><p>Compare that to the $1.50/$9.00 per 1M tokens for Gemini 3.5 Flash, and the $2/$12 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, and the savings are considerable. However, Google's prior generation Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite still remains the search giant's "most cost-efficient" model at $0.25/$1.50 per 1M tokens. Yet, it remains 2X slower than the new, more expensive Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, giving those enterprises who value speed more "bang" for their buck. </p><h2><b>VB Frontier AI Model API Pricing Comparison Chart (Late July 2026 Shortlist)</b></h2><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Model</b></p></td><td><p><b>Input ($/1M)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Output ($/1M)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Total ($/1M)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Source</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5 Flash</p></td><td><p>$0.10</p></td><td><p>$0.30</p></td><td><p>$0.40</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>deepseek-v4-flash</p></td><td><p>$0.14</p></td><td><p>$0.28</p></td><td><p>$0.42</p></td><td><p><a href="https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing">DeepSeek</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>deepseek-v4-pro</p></td><td><p>$0.435</p></td><td><p>$0.87</p></td><td><p>$1.305</p></td><td><p><a href="https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing">DeepSeek</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiniMax-M3</p></td><td><p>$0.30</p></td><td><p>$1.20</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.minimax.io/subscribe/token-plan?tab=api-enterprise">MiniMax</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>LongCat-2.0 — limited-time promo</p></td><td><p>$0.30</p></td><td><p>$1.20</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://longcat.chat/platform/docs/APIPayAsYouGo.html">LongCat</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite</p></td><td><p>$0.25</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p>$1.75</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Qwen3.7-Plus</p></td><td><p>$0.40</p></td><td><p>$1.60</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://modelstudio.console.alibabacloud.com/ap-southeast-1?tab=doc#/doc/?type=model&amp;url=2840914_2&amp;modelId=qwen3.7-plus&amp;serviceSite=international">Alibaba Cloud</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5</p></td><td><p>$0.40</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$2.40</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite</b></p></td><td><p><b>$0.30</b></p></td><td><p><b>$2.50</b></p></td><td><p><b>$2.80</b></p></td><td><p><b></b><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing"><b>Google</b></a><b></b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>LongCat-2.0 — standard</p></td><td><p>$0.75</p></td><td><p>$2.95</p></td><td><p>$3.70</p></td><td><p><a href="https://longcat.chat/platform/docs/APIPayAsYouGo.html">LongCat</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5 Pro (≤256K)</p></td><td><p>$1.00</p></td><td><p>$3.00</p></td><td><p>$4.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GLM-5.2</p></td><td><p>$1.40</p></td><td><p>$4.40</p></td><td><p>$5.80</p></td><td><p><a href="https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing">Z.ai</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.6 Luna</p></td><td><p>$1.00</p></td><td><p>$6.00</p></td><td><p>$7.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Grok 4.5</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$6.00</p></td><td><p>$8.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://docs.x.ai/developers/models">xAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>MiMo-V2.5 Pro (&gt;256K)</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$6.00</p></td><td><p>$8.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/docs/en-US/pricing">Xiaomi</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><b>Gemini 3.6 Flash</b></p></td><td><p><b>$1.50</b></p></td><td><p><b>$7.50</b></p></td><td><p><b>$9.00</b></p></td><td><p><b></b><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing"><b>Google</b></a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Qwen3.7-Max</p></td><td><p>$2.50</p></td><td><p>$7.50</p></td><td><p>$10.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://modelstudio.console.alibabacloud.com/ap-southeast-1?tab=doc#/doc/?type=model&amp;url=2840914_2&amp;modelId=qwen3.7-max&amp;serviceSite=international">Alibaba Cloud</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.5 Flash</p></td><td><p>$1.50</p></td><td><p>$9.00</p></td><td><p>$10.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (≤200K)</p></td><td><p>$2.00</p></td><td><p>$12.00</p></td><td><p>$14.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.6 Terra</p></td><td><p>$2.50</p></td><td><p>$15.00</p></td><td><p>$17.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.4</p></td><td><p>$2.50</p></td><td><p>$15.00</p></td><td><p>$17.50</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/api/pricing/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Kimi K3</p></td><td><p>$3.00</p></td><td><p>$15.00</p></td><td><p>$18.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/pricing/chat-k3">Moonshot AI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (&gt;200K)</p></td><td><p>$4.00</p></td><td><p>$18.00</p></td><td><p>$22.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing">Google</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Claude Opus 4.8</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$25.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing">Anthropic</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.5</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/api/pricing/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.5 Instant (chat-latest)</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/chat-latest">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sakana Fugu Ultra (≤272K)</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://console.sakana.ai/pricing#subscription-plan">Sakana AI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>GPT-5.6 Sol</p></td><td><p>$5.00</p></td><td><p>$30.00</p></td><td><p>$35.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://openai.com/index/previewing-gpt-5-6-sol/">OpenAI</a></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Claude Fable 5 / Claude Mythos 5</p></td><td><p>$10.00</p></td><td><p>$50.00</p></td><td><p>$60.00</p></td><td><p><a href="https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/models/overview">Anthropic</a></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>No price was provided yet for the specialty Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber model, which, as its name would imply, is designed for cybersecurity researchers and red teamers to patch bugs. </p><p>While the prices are among the middle-low end of all major AI models globally, the fact that Google designed them to use less tokens overall also should drive down costs for enterprises beyond what the sticker price shows (since you'll be paying for fewer total tokens at any rate). </p><p>Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite are available immediately through the Gemini API in Google AI Studio and Android Studio, as well as within the consumer Gemini application and Google Search. According to a <a href="https://deepmind.google/blog/introducing-gemini-3-5-flash-cyber/">separate Google blog post</a>, Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber will be available "exclusively available to governments and trusted partners via CodeMender soon" — <a href="https://deepmind.google/blog/introducing-codemender-an-ai-agent-for-code-security/">CodeMender</a> being Google's proprietary AI code bug-fixing agent released last year. </p><p>As with previous Gemini models, these are all proprietary and "closed source," thus, they can only be obtained through Google's official API and that of its partners, as opposed to an open-source license like MIT or Apache 2.0. </p><p>One conspicuous omission noted by developers on X and social media: where is the larger, more powerful, flagship Gemini 3.5 Pro model Google previously alluded would be released this summer? After all, Gemini 3.1 Pro, the prior flagship, <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/google-launches-gemini-3-1-pro-retaking-ai-crown-with-2x-reasoning">debuted back in February 2026</a>, and rivals OpenAI and Anthropic have since released several more generations of flagship updates far more powerful than Google's. </p><p>Google technical staffer Logan Kilpatrick <a href="https://x.com/OfficialLoganK/status/2079592006163349538">responded to one such inquiry on X, writing</a>: "Gemini 3.5 Pro is currently testing with partners and we plan to make it broadly available as soon as it’s ready." </p><p>Google's release signals that the immediate future of AI lies in agentic capabilities—systems that operate autonomously over extended periods. </p><p>If early large language models are akin to massive, fuel-hungry freight trains capable of hauling incredible loads at immense cost, the new Flash series represents a fleet of nimble, hyper-efficient hybrid delivery vans.</p><h2><b>Efficiency gains ranging from 17% to 65% reduced tokens for strong results on third-party benchmarks</b></h2><p>Under the hood, Gemini 3.6 Flash achieves significant efficiency gains. The model reduces output token usage by 17% compared to its predecessor, Gemini 3.5 Flash, according to the <a href="https://x.com/ArtificialAnlys/status/2079596244339707956">Artificial Analysis Index</a> maintained by the independent third-party AI benchmarking group of the same name. </p><p>In specific long-horizon software engineering benchmarks like <a href="https://deepswe.datacurve.ai/">DeepSWE</a>, which measures how well agents complete multi-step engineering tasks from scratch, the token savings reach up to 65%. </p><p>This reduction means the model requires fewer reasoning steps and tool calls to complete the exact same multi-step workflow. Think of token efficiency like fuel economy in a vehicle. </p><p>When an AI model takes a convoluted path to solve a problem, it burns through more computational fuel, driving up the final cost for the developer. By streamlining its internal logic, Gemini 3.6 Flash arrives at the correct answer faster and cheaper.</p><p>While Google's materials did not specify the exact architectural or algorithmic changes used to achieve this token efficiency, they noted that the model "takes fewer reasoning steps and tool calls to accomplish multi-step workflows" and exhibits reduced "verbosity."</p><p>The official model cards released by Google reveal that both <a href="https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/Model-Cards/Gemini-3-6-Flash-Model-Card.pdf">Gemini 3.6 Flash</a> and <a href="https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/Model-Cards/Gemini-3-5-Flash-Lite-Model-Card.pdf">Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite</a> feature a 1-million-token input context window alongside a max output limit of 64,000 tokens, with both models sharing a knowledge cutoff date of March 2026.</p><h2><b>Respectable benchmark performance at low cost</b></h2><p>The technological improvements extend to concrete capabilities. Gemini 3.6 Flash scores 49% on the DeepSWE benchmark, a notable increase from the 37% achieved by version 3.5. </p><p>It also pushes machine learning engineering performance higher, scoring 63.9% on MLE-Bench compared to 49.7% previously. Furthermore, Google integrates computer use as a built-in client-side tool via the Gemini API and Gemini Enterprise, reflecting an OSWorld-Verified score of 83.0%, up from 78.4%. </p><p>The model also tackles knowledge work with greater proficiency, outperforming its predecessor on benchmarks like GDPval-AA v2 by moving from a score of 1349 to 1421.</p><p>To ensure safety amidst these capability upgrades, Google deploys enhanced Frontier Safety safeguards. These protections harden the model against jailbreaks and mitigate risks in Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear domains, as well as cyber offense misuses. </p><p>The engineering team trains the model to minimize refusals for beneficial uses, striking a necessary balance between strict security and practical utility.</p><h2>M<b>odels for low-cost coding, agentic, and cybersecurity use cases — respectively</b></h2><p>Google divided its new offerings into three distinct products tailored for different operational needs. </p><p>Gemini 3.6 Flash serves as the heavy-duty workhorse of the trio. It handles complex coding, intricate knowledge work, and multimodal processing with improved precision. Enterprise customers utilize it for demanding tasks such as complex document parsing, intricate chart and data analysis, and long-form report drafting. The model executes complex code migrations using multi-agent orchestration frameworks with lower latency and higher quality than earlier iterations. Furthermore, 3.6 Flash aids in developing photographic texture extractors for 3D workflows using canvas interfaces.</p><p>Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite targets environments where high throughput and absolute minimal latency are non-negotiable. Google designates it as the fastest model in the 3.5 series. </p><p>As measured by Artificial Analysis, the model processes 350 output tokens per second, making it highly effective for agentic search and massive document processing workloads. <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/articles/gemini-3-6-flash-3-5-flash-lite-halving-time">Artificial Analysis notes</a> this is about twice as fast as prior generation model Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.</p><p>Developers can configure 3.5 Flash-Lite to prioritize low-latency execution for high-volume tasks using minimal thinking levels, or engage higher thinking levels to process complex multi-step subagent workloads. </p><p>Despite its lite designation, it outperforms the standard Gemini 3 Flash on several key agentic and coding evaluations, including SWE-Bench Pro, where it scores 54.2% compared to 49.6%, and OSWorld-Verified, scoring 74.0% versus 65.1%. </p><p>The model extracts product features from massive datasets, generates interactive web design concepts, and scales receipt translation seamlessly.</p><p>The third product, Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber, represents a highly specialized deployment. Google fine-tuned this model specifically to find and fix cybersecurity vulnerabilities. It integrates directly with Google's CodeMender agent. </p><p>In practice, multiple 3.5 Flash Cyber agents work concurrently to produce a single, comprehensive vulnerability report, achieving competitive performance at the frontier on the CyberGym benchmark. </p><p>Google did not specify an exact numerical cost for 3.5 Flash Cyber, stating only that it is fine-tuned "at a lower price per token than larger models.</p><h2><b>Commercial licensing only</b></h2><p>The licensing framework for the new Gemini models carries profound implications for developers and enterprise users. Google deploys Gemini 3.6 Flash and 3.5 Flash-Lite under a commercial, proprietary API model. Unlike open-source software governed by licenses such as the MIT License or the GNU General Public License, developers do not gain access to the underlying model weights, training data, or source code.</p><p>An MIT or GPL license grants users the freedom to download the codebase, modify the internal architecture, self-host the deployment, and distribute the software infrastructure independently. In contrast, Google's API approach means developers essentially rent access to the intelligence on a strict metered basis. Every prompt and generated response travels through Google's managed servers, incurring a cost based on the strict pricing structure of $1.50 per million input tokens for 3.6 Flash. </p><p>This commercial tethering restricts deployment flexibility. Enterprises cannot air-gap the models entirely on their own local secure hardware without establishing specialized, high-tier enterprise agreements with Google Cloud. Developers remain bound by Google's acceptable use policies, arbitrary rate limits, and network requirements, creating a permanent dependency on Google's infrastructure uptime and terms of service.</p><p>The licensing for Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber proves even more restrictive. Acknowledging the dual-use nature of cybersecurity AI—which attackers can weaponize just as easily as defenders can use it to patch systems—Google is for now making the model only available behind a limited-access pilot program, similar to the trend kicked off by Anthropic's Mythos model with its Project Glasswing program, and continued by OpenAI with its staggered rollout for GPT-5.6. </p><p>In this case, Google is making 3.5 Flash Cyber exclusively available to governments and trusted partners. This strict gatekeeping prevents open access, prioritizing systemic security over widespread developer innovation.</p><h2><b>Looking ahead</b></h2><p>Google DeepMind continues to iterate rapidly, but the gap in its product line remains apparent. While the Flash series excels in speed and economy, </p><p>the industry eagerly awaits the deployment of Gemini 3.5 Pro to gauge Google's absolute frontier capabilities.</p><p>Simultaneously, the company confirms that pre-training for Gemini 4 has already commenced. </p><p>Until the next major flagship release materializes, developers must optimize their systems using the highly efficient, yet purposefully constrained, Flash architecture.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Netflix Is Removing Classic Sitcom ‘The Game’ in August 2026]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Fans of The Game have limited time left to watch the series on Netflix in the US. After spending nearly six years on the platform, the first three seasons of the popular comedy-drama are scheduled to leave the streaming service in August 2026 as Netflix's licensing agreement comes to an end.



W...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684619/ios-mac-os/netflix-is-removing-classic-sitcom-the-game-in-august-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684619/ios-mac-os/netflix-is-removing-classic-sitcom-the-game-in-august-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 20:28:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Fans of The Game have limited time left to watch the series on Netflix in the US. After spending nearly six years on the platform, the first three seasons of the popular comedy-drama are scheduled to leave the streaming service in August 2026 as Netflix's licensing agreement comes to an end.



When is The Game Leaving Netflix?



Netflix is currently showing a "Last day to watch" notice for The Game. Subscribers can stream Seasons 1 through 3 until August 14, 2026. The series will officially leave the platform on August 15, 2026.



End of an Era for Netflix's Classic Black Sitcom Collection



The departure of The Game closes an important chapter for Netflix. In 2020, the platform added several beloved Black sitcoms through its Strong Black Lead initiative, including Moesha, Girlfriends, Sister, Sister, The Parkers, Half &amp; Half, and One on One.



Most of those series left Netflix in 2023 after their licensing agreements expired. The Game remained available much longer, making it the final survivor from that memorable collection before its scheduled exit.



Why Only Three Seasons Were Available



Many viewers have wondered why Netflix never added Seasons 4 through 9. The answer comes down to streaming rights.



The first three seasons originally aired on The CW between 2006 and 2009. After the network canceled the show, BET revived it in 2011 and produced six additional seasons.



Netflix's agreement only covered the original CW episodes. Since the later BET seasons were licensed separately, Netflix never had the rights to stream the complete series.



Where Can You Watch The Game Next?



At the moment, there is no confirmed streaming home for the series after it leaves Netflix. Since the show is owned by Paramount, many fans expect it to eventually return to Paramount+ or BET+, but no official announcement has been made. Until then, the series is mainly available through digital video-on-demand services.



If The Game has been on your watchlist, now is the time to finish it before the first three seasons disappear from Netflix in mid-August.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[‘SEAL Team’ Confirms Netflix Release Date, Multiple Seasons Arrive This August]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[SEAL Team is officially heading to Netflix in the United States, with multiple seasons scheduled to arrive on August 18, 2026. The release gives military drama fans a major new series to watch before summer ends.



How Many Seasons Are Coming to Netflix?



Netflix has confirmed that more than o...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684521/ios-mac-os/seal-team-confirms-netflix-release-date-multiple-seasons-arrive-this-august/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684521/ios-mac-os/seal-team-confirms-netflix-release-date-multiple-seasons-arrive-this-august/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:49:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[SEAL Team is officially heading to Netflix in the United States, with multiple seasons scheduled to arrive on August 18, 2026. The release gives military drama fans a major new series to watch before summer ends.



How Many Seasons Are Coming to Netflix?



Netflix has confirmed that more than one season will become available, although the exact number has not been announced. The show has seven completed seasons, so Netflix has a large collection of episodes to choose from.



More information could arrive when Netflix publishes its full August 2026 release schedule. For now, viewers can expect at least two seasons when the series joins the service.



The Netflix release forms part of a licensing agreement involving several Paramount-owned shows. It follows other licensed dramas that have recently expanded beyond their original streaming homes.



What Is ‘SEAL Team’ About?



SEAL Team follows Bravo Team, an elite unit of United States Navy SEALs that handles dangerous missions around the world. The story covers mission planning, combat operations, family pressures and the lasting effects of military service.



David Boreanaz leads the cast as Jason Hayes, the experienced leader of Bravo Team. The main cast also includes Max Thieriot, Neil Brown Jr., A.J. Buckley, Toni Trucks and Jessica Paré.



The series first premiered on CBS in September 2017. It remained on broadcast television for its first four seasons before moving to Paramount+ during Season 5.



That move allowed the series to feature more mature storytelling, stronger language and darker mission-related themes. It eventually ended with its seventh and final season in October 2024. The complete series includes 114 episodes.



Is This the Animated ‘Seal Team’ Movie?



The incoming title is the live-action military drama starring David Boreanaz. It is separate from Netflix’s animated 2021 movie Seal Team, which follows a group of seals fighting sharks.



Multiple seasons of SEAL Team will begin streaming on Netflix US on August 18, 2026, giving existing fans another place to revisit Bravo Team’s missions while introducing the finished series to a wider audience.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Siemens IAM Client]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[View CSAF
Summary
Multiple Siemens products are affected by unquoted search path vulnerability in IAM Client. This could allow an authenticated local attacker to perform privilege escalation. Siemens has released new versions for several affected products and recommends to update to the latest ve...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684509/it-security-nachrichten/siemens-iam-client/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684509/it-security-nachrichten/siemens-iam-client/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:45:29 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-202-05.json"><strong>View CSAF</strong></a></p>
<h2>Summary</h2>
<p><strong>Multiple Siemens products are affected by unquoted search path vulnerability in IAM Client. This could allow an authenticated local attacker to perform privilege escalation. Siemens has released new versions for several affected products and recommends to update to the latest versions. Siemens is preparing further fix versions and recommends countermeasures for products where fixes are not, or not yet available.</strong></p>
<p>The following versions of Siemens IAM Client are affected:</p>
<ul>
<li>COMOS V10.4.5 vers:intdot/&lt;10.4.5.0.2 </li>
<li>COMOS V10.6 vers:intdot/&lt;10.6.1 </li>
<li>Designcenter NX vers:intdot/&lt;2512.7000 </li>
<li>Simcenter 3D vers:intdot/&lt;2512.7000 </li>
<li>Simcenter Femap V2506 vers:intdot/&lt;2506.0003 </li>
<li>Simcenter Femap V2512 vers:intdot/&lt;2512.0002 </li>
<li>Simcenter Nastran vers:intdot/&lt;2606 </li>
<li>Simcenter STAR-CCM+ vers:intdot/&lt;2606 </li>
<li>Solid Edge SE2025 vers:intdot/&lt;225.0.13.3 </li>
<li>Solid Edge SE2026 vers:intdot/&lt;226.0.04.003 </li>
<li>Teamcenter Visualization V2412 vers:intdot/&lt;2412.0012 </li>
<li>Teamcenter Visualization V2506 vers:intdot/&lt;2506.0009 </li>
<li>Teamcenter Visualization V2512 vers:intdot/&lt;2512.2605 </li>
<li>Tecnomatix Plant Simulation V2404 vers:intdot/&lt;2404.0022 </li>
<li>Tecnomatix Plant Simulation V2504 vers:intdot/&lt;2504.0010 </li>
<li>Tecnomatix Process Simulate vers:intdot/&lt;2606 </li>
</ul>
<div class="csaf-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vendor</th>
<th role="columnheader">Equipment</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vulnerabilities</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>v3 6.7</td>
<td>Siemens</td>
<td>Siemens IAM Client</td>
<td>Untrusted Search Path</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<h3>Background</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Critical Infrastructure Sectors: </strong>Chemical, Critical Manufacturing, Energy</li>
<li><strong>Countries/Areas Deployed: </strong>Worldwide</li>
<li><strong>Company Headquarters Location: </strong>Germany</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>Vulnerabilities</h2>
<div class="csaf-accordion">
<p><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle-all" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">Expand All +</a></p>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-40945</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>Untrusted search path in IAM Client SDK may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40945">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens IAM Client</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>COMOS V10.4.5 &lt; V10.4.5.0.2, COMOS V10.6 &lt; V10.6.1, Designcenter NX &lt; V2512.7000, Simcenter 3D &lt; V2512.7000, Simcenter Femap V2506 &lt; V2506.0003, Simcenter Femap V2512 &lt; V2512.0002, Simcenter Nastran &lt; V2606, Simcenter STAR-CCM+ &lt; V2606, Solid Edge SE2025 &lt; V225.0.13.3, Solid Edge SE2026 &lt; V226.0.04.003, Teamcenter Visualization V2412 &lt; V2412.0012, Teamcenter Visualization V2506 &lt; V2506.0009, Teamcenter Visualization V2512 &lt; V2512.2605, Tecnomatix Plant Simulation V2404 &lt; V2404.0022, Tecnomatix Plant Simulation V2504 &lt; V2504.0010, Tecnomatix Process Simulate &lt; V2606</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V10.6.1 or later version<br><a href="https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/222981661/">https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/222981661/</a></p>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V225.0 Update 13 or later version<br><a href="https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/246738425/">https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/246738425/</a></p>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V226.0 Update 04 or later version<br><a href="https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/246738425/">https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/246738425/</a></p>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V2404.0022 or later version<br><a href="https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/297028302/">https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/297028302/</a></p>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V2412.0012 or later version<br><a href="https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/229029598/">https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/229029598/</a></p>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V2504.0010 or later version<br><a href="https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/297028302/">https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/297028302/</a></p>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V2506.0003 or later version<br><a href="https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/275652363/">https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/275652363/</a></p>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V2506.0009 or later version<br><a href="https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/229029598/">https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/229029598/</a></p>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V2512.0002 or later version<br><a href="https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/275652363/">https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/275652363/</a></p>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V2512.2605 or later version<br><a href="https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/229029598/">https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/229029598/</a></p>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V2512.7000 or later version<br><a href="https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/209349590/">https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/209349590/</a></p>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V2512.7000 or later version<br><a href="https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/289054037/">https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/289054037/</a></p>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V2606 or later version<br><a href="https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/289054037/">https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/289054037/</a></p>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V10.4.5.0.2 or later version. Contact customer support to receive patch and update information</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/426.html">CWE-426 Untrusted Search Path</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>6.7</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<h2>Acknowledgments</h2>
<ul>
<li>Siemens ProductCERT reported this vulnerability to CISA.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>General Recommendations</h2>
<p>As a general security measure, Siemens strongly recommends to protect network access to devices with appropriate mechanisms. In order to operate the devices in a protected IT environment, Siemens recommends to configure the environment according to Siemens' operational guidelines for Industrial Security (Download: https://www.siemens.com/cert/operational-guidelines-industrial-security), and to follow the recommendations in the product manuals. Additional information on Industrial Security by Siemens can be found at: https://www.siemens.com/industrialsecurity</p>
<hr>
<h2>Additional Resources</h2>
<p>For further inquiries on security vulnerabilities in Siemens products and solutions, please contact the Siemens ProductCERT: https://www.siemens.com/cert/advisories</p>
<hr>
<h2>Terms of Use</h2>
<p>The use of Siemens Security Advisories is subject to the terms and conditions listed on: https://www.siemens.com/productcert/terms-of-use.</p>
<hr>
<h2>Legal Notice and Terms of Use</h2>
<p>This product is provided subject to this Notification (https://www.cisa.gov/notification) and this Privacy &amp; Use policy (https://www.cisa.gov/privacy-policy).</p>
<hr>
<h2>Recommended Practices</h2>
<p>CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the exploitation risk of these vulnerabilities.</p>
<p>Minimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems, and ensure they are not accessible from the internet.</p>
<p>Locate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls and isolate them from business networks.</p>
<p>When remote access is required, use more secure methods, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), recognizing VPNs may have vulnerabilities and should be updated to the most recent version available. Also recognize VPN is only as secure as its connected devices.</p>
<p>CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures.</p>
<p>CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices on the ICS webpage on cisa.gov. Several CISA products detailing cyber defense best practices are available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies.</p>
<p>CISA encourages organizations to implement recommended cybersecurity strategies for proactive defense of ICS assets. Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available on the ICS webpage at cisa.gov in the technical information paper, ICS-TIP-12-146-01B--Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation Strategies.</p>
<p>Organizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents.</p>
<hr>
<h2>Advisory Conversion Disclaimer</h2>
<p>This ICSA is a verbatim republication of Siemens ProductCERT SSA-288252 from a direct conversion of the vendor's Common Security Advisory Framework (CSAF) advisory. This is republished to CISA's website as a means of increasing visibility and is provided "as-is" for informational purposes only. CISA is not responsible for the editorial or technical accuracy of republished advisories and provides no warranties of any kind regarding any information contained within this advisory. Further, CISA does not endorse any commercial product or service. Please contact Siemens ProductCERT directly for any questions regarding this advisory.</p>
<h2>Revision History</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Initial Release Date: </strong>2026-07-14</li>
</ul>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">Date</th>
<th role="columnheader">Revision</th>
<th role="columnheader">Summary</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>2026-07-14</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>Publication Date</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2026-07-21</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>Initial CISA Republication of Siemens ProductCERT SSA-288252 advisory</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr>
<h2>Legal Notice and Terms of Use</h2>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Siemens RUGGEDCOM APE1808 with Palo Alto Networks Virtual NGFW]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[View CSAF
Summary
Palo Alto Networks has published [1] information on vulnerabilities in PAN-OS. This advisory lists the related Siemens Industrial products affected by these vulnerabilities. Customers are advised to consult and implement the workarounds provided in Palo Alto Networks' upstream s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684508/it-security-nachrichten/siemens-ruggedcom-ape1808-with-palo-alto-networks-virtual-ngfw/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684508/it-security-nachrichten/siemens-ruggedcom-ape1808-with-palo-alto-networks-virtual-ngfw/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:45:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-202-02.json"><strong>View CSAF</strong></a></p>
<h2>Summary</h2>
<p><strong>Palo Alto Networks has published [1] information on vulnerabilities in PAN-OS. This advisory lists the related Siemens Industrial products affected by these vulnerabilities. Customers are advised to consult and implement the workarounds provided in Palo Alto Networks' upstream security notifications. [1] https://security.paloaltonetworks.com/</strong></p>
<p>The following versions of Siemens RUGGEDCOM APE1808 with Palo Alto Networks Virtual NGFW are affected:</p>
<ul>
<li>RUGGEDCOM APE1808 vers:all/* </li>
</ul>
<div class="csaf-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vendor</th>
<th role="columnheader">Equipment</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vulnerabilities</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>v3 7.2</td>
<td>Siemens</td>
<td>Siemens RUGGEDCOM APE1808 with Palo Alto Networks Virtual NGFW</td>
<td>Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting'), Missing Authorization, Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<h3>Background</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Critical Infrastructure Sectors: </strong>Critical Manufacturing</li>
<li><strong>Countries/Areas Deployed: </strong>Worldwide</li>
<li><strong>Company Headquarters Location: </strong>Germany</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>Vulnerabilities</h2>
<div class="csaf-accordion">
<p><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle-all" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">Expand All +</a></p>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-0266</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS® software enables a malicious authenticated administrator to store a JavaScript payload using the web interface. This issue is applicable to PAN-OS software on PA-Series and VM-Series firewalls and on Panorama (virtual and M-Series). Cloud NGFW and Prisma® Access are not affected by this vulnerability.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0266">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens RUGGEDCOM APE1808 with Palo Alto Networks Virtual NGFW</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM APE1808 with Palo Alto Networks Virtual NGFW</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Contact customer support to receive patch and update information</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html">CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>2.4</td>
<td>LOW</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-0272</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A privilege escalation vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS® software allows an authenticated administrator with access to the Command Line Interface (CLI) to perform actions on the device with root privileges. The security risk posed by this issue is significantly minimized when CLI access is restricted to a limited group of administrators and by restricting access to the management interface to only trusted internal IP addresses according to our recommended best practice deployment guidelines https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/community-blogs/tips-amp-tricks-how-to-secure-the-management-access-of-your-palo/ba-p/464431 . This issue is applicable to PAN-OS software on PA-Series and VM-Series firewalls and on Panorama (virtual and M-Series). Cloud NGFW, and Prisma® Access are not impacted by this vulnerability.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0272">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens RUGGEDCOM APE1808 with Palo Alto Networks Virtual NGFW</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM APE1808 with Palo Alto Networks Virtual NGFW</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Contact customer support to receive patch and update information</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/862.html">CWE-862 Missing Authorization</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>6.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-0273</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A command injection vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS® software enables an authenticated administrator to bypass system restrictions and run arbitrary commands as a root user. To be able to exploit this issue, the user must have access to the PAN-OS CLI or Web UI. The security risk posed by this issue is significantly minimized when CLI access is restricted to a limited group of administrators and by restricting access to the management web interface to only trusted internal IP addresses according to our recommended best practice deployment guidelines https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/community-blogs/tips-amp-tricks-how-to-secure-the-management-access-of-your-palo/ba-p/464431 . This issue is applicable to PAN-OS software on PA-Series and VM-Series firewalls and on Panorama (virtual and M-Series). Cloud NGFW and Prisma® Access are not affected by this vulnerability.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-0273">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens RUGGEDCOM APE1808 with Palo Alto Networks Virtual NGFW</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>RUGGEDCOM APE1808 with Palo Alto Networks Virtual NGFW</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Contact customer support to receive patch and update information</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html">CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.2</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<h2>Acknowledgments</h2>
<ul>
<li>Siemens ProductCERT reported these vulnerabilities to CISA.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>General Recommendations</h2>
<p>As a general security measure, Siemens strongly recommends to protect network access to devices with appropriate mechanisms. In order to operate the devices in a protected IT environment, Siemens recommends to configure the environment according to Siemens' operational guidelines for Industrial Security (Download: https://www.siemens.com/cert/operational-guidelines-industrial-security), and to follow the recommendations in the product manuals. Additional information on Industrial Security by Siemens can be found at: https://www.siemens.com/industrialsecurity</p>
<hr>
<h2>Additional Resources</h2>
<p>For further inquiries on security vulnerabilities in Siemens products and solutions, please contact the Siemens ProductCERT: https://www.siemens.com/cert/advisories</p>
<hr>
<h2>Terms of Use</h2>
<p>The use of Siemens Security Advisories is subject to the terms and conditions listed on: https://www.siemens.com/productcert/terms-of-use.</p>
<hr>
<h2>Legal Notice and Terms of Use</h2>
<p>This product is provided subject to this Notification (https://www.cisa.gov/notification) and this Privacy &amp; Use policy (https://www.cisa.gov/privacy-policy).</p>
<hr>
<h2>Recommended Practices</h2>
<p>CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the exploitation risk of this vulnerability.</p>
<p>Minimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems, and ensure they are not accessible from the internet.</p>
<p>Locate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls and isolate them from business networks.</p>
<p>When remote access is required, use more secure methods, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), recognizing VPNs may have vulnerabilities and should be updated to the most recent version available. Also recognize VPN is only as secure as its connected devices.</p>
<p>CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures.</p>
<p>CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices on the ICS webpage on cisa.gov. Several CISA products detailing cyber defense best practices are available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies.</p>
<p>CISA encourages organizations to implement recommended cybersecurity strategies for proactive defense of ICS assets. Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available on the ICS webpage at cisa.gov in the technical information paper, ICS-TIP-12-146-01B--Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation Strategies.</p>
<p>Organizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents.</p>
<hr>
<h2>Advisory Conversion Disclaimer</h2>
<p>This ICSA is a verbatim republication of Siemens ProductCERT SSA-104023 from a direct conversion of the vendor's Common Security Advisory Framework (CSAF) advisory. This is republished to CISA's website as a means of increasing visibility and is provided "as-is" for informational purposes only. CISA is not responsible for the editorial or technical accuracy of republished advisories and provides no warranties of any kind regarding any information contained within this advisory. Further, CISA does not endorse any commercial product or service. Please contact Siemens ProductCERT directly for any questions regarding this advisory.</p>
<h2>Revision History</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Initial Release Date: </strong>2026-07-14</li>
</ul>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">Date</th>
<th role="columnheader">Revision</th>
<th role="columnheader">Summary</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>2026-07-14</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>Publication Date</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2026-07-21</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>Initial CISA Republication of Siemens ProductCERT SSA-104023 advisory</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr>
<h2>Legal Notice and Terms of Use</h2>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Siemens CADRA]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[View CSAF
Summary
CADRA is affected by multiple zlib and Foxit vulnerabilities. Siemens has released a new version for CADRA and recommends to update to the latest version. Siemens is preparing further fix versions and recommends specific countermeasures for products where fixes are not, or not y...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684507/it-security-nachrichten/siemens-cadra/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684507/it-security-nachrichten/siemens-cadra/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:45:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-202-06.json"><strong>View CSAF</strong></a></p>
<h2>Summary</h2>
<p><strong>CADRA is affected by multiple zlib and Foxit vulnerabilities. Siemens has released a new version for CADRA and recommends to update to the latest version. Siemens is preparing further fix versions and recommends specific countermeasures for products where fixes are not, or not yet available.</strong></p>
<p>The following versions of Siemens CADRA are affected:</p>
<ul>
<li>CADRA vers:intdot/&lt;2511, vers:all/* </li>
</ul>
<div class="csaf-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vendor</th>
<th role="columnheader">Equipment</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vulnerabilities</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>v3 9.8</td>
<td>Siemens</td>
<td>Siemens CADRA</td>
<td>Improper Input Validation, Incorrect Bitwise Shift of Integer, Out-of-bounds Write, Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow'), Integer Overflow or Wraparound, Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<h3>Background</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Critical Infrastructure Sectors: </strong>Chemical, Commercial Facilities, Communications, Energy</li>
<li><strong>Countries/Areas Deployed: </strong>Worldwide</li>
<li><strong>Company Headquarters Location: </strong>Germany</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>Vulnerabilities</h2>
<div class="csaf-accordion">
<p><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle-all" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">Expand All +</a></p>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2005-2096</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>zlib 1.2 and later versions allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted compressed stream with an incomplete code description of a length greater than 1, which leads to a buffer overflow, as demonstrated using a crafted PNG file.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2005-2096">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens CADRA</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>CADRA &lt; V2511</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V2511 or later version</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.3</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2016-9840</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>inftrees.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging improper pointer arithmetic.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-9840">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens CADRA</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>CADRA &lt; V2511</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V2511 or later version</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>8.8</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2016-9841</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>inffast.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging improper pointer arithmetic.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-9841">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens CADRA</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>CADRA &lt; V2511</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V2511 or later version</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>9.8</td>
<td>CRITICAL</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2016-9842</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>The inflateMark function in inflate.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors involving left shifts of negative integers.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2016-9842">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens CADRA</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>CADRA &lt; V2511</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V2511 or later version</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1335.html">CWE-1335 Incorrect Bitwise Shift of Integer</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>8.8</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2017-14919</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>Node.js before 4.8.5, 6.x before 6.11.5, and 8.x before 8.8.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (uncaught exception and crash) by leveraging a change in the zlib module 1.2.9 making 8 an invalid value for the windowBits parameter.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-14919">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens CADRA</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>CADRA &lt; V2511</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V2511 or later version</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/20.html">CWE-20 Improper Input Validation</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.0</td>
<td>7.5</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.0#CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2018-25032</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>zlib before 1.2.12 allows memory corruption when deflating (i.e., when compressing) if the input has many distant matches.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-25032">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens CADRA</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>CADRA &lt; V2511</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V2511 or later version</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/787.html">CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.5</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2022-37434</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>zlib through 1.2.12 has a heap-based buffer over-read or buffer overflow in inflate in inflate.c via a large gzip header extra field. NOTE: only applications that call inflateGetHeader are affected. Some common applications bundle the affected zlib source code but may be unable to call inflateGetHeader (e.g., see the nodejs/node reference).</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37434">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens CADRA</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>CADRA &lt; V2511</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V2511 or later version</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/120.html">CWE-120 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>9.8</td>
<td>CRITICAL</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2023-45853</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>MiniZip in zlib through 1.3 has an integer overflow and resultant heap-based buffer overflow in zipOpenNewFileInZip4_64 via a long filename, comment, or extra field. NOTE: MiniZip is not a supported part of the zlib product. NOTE: pyminizip through 0.2.6 is also vulnerable because it bundles an affected zlib version, and exposes the applicable MiniZip code through its compress API.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45853">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens CADRA</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>CADRA &lt; V2511</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V2511 or later version</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/190.html">CWE-190 Integer Overflow or Wraparound</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>9.8</td>
<td>CRITICAL</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-10585</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 140.0.7339.185 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-10585">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens CADRA</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>CADRA</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Block access to untrusted or external web content from sensitive systems</p>
<p><strong>None available</strong><br>Currently no fix is available</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/843.html">CWE-843 Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>8.8</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-13223</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 142.0.7444.175 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-13223">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens CADRA</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>CADRA</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong><br>Block access to untrusted or external web content from sensitive systems</p>
<p><strong>None available</strong><br>Currently no fix is available</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/843.html">CWE-843 Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>8.8</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-22184</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>zlib versions up to and including 1.3.1.2 include a global buffer overflow in the untgz utility located under contrib/untgz. The vulnerability is limited to the standalone demonstration utility and does not affect the core zlib compression library. The flaw occurs when a user executes the untgz command with an excessively long archive name supplied via the command line, leading to an out-of-bounds write in a fixed-size global buffer.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22184">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens CADRA</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>CADRA</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>None available</strong><br>Currently no fix is available</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/787.html">CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>NONE</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:N</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<h2>Acknowledgments</h2>
<ul>
<li>Siemens ProductCERT reported these vulnerabilities to CISA.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>General Recommendations</h2>
<p>As a general security measure, Siemens strongly recommends to protect network access to devices with appropriate mechanisms. In order to operate the devices in a protected IT environment, Siemens recommends to configure the environment according to Siemens' operational guidelines for Industrial Security (Download: https://www.siemens.com/cert/operational-guidelines-industrial-security), and to follow the recommendations in the product manuals. Additional information on Industrial Security by Siemens can be found at: https://www.siemens.com/industrialsecurity</p>
<hr>
<h2>Additional Resources</h2>
<p>For further inquiries on security vulnerabilities in Siemens products and solutions, please contact the Siemens ProductCERT: https://www.siemens.com/cert/advisories</p>
<hr>
<h2>Terms of Use</h2>
<p>The use of Siemens Security Advisories is subject to the terms and conditions listed on: https://www.siemens.com/productcert/terms-of-use.</p>
<hr>
<h2>Legal Notice and Terms of Use</h2>
<p>This product is provided subject to this Notification (https://www.cisa.gov/notification) and this Privacy &amp; Use policy (https://www.cisa.gov/privacy-policy).</p>
<hr>
<h2>Recommended Practices</h2>
<p>CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the exploitation risk of this vulnerability.</p>
<p>Minimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems, and ensure they are not accessible from the internet.</p>
<p>Locate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls and isolate them from business networks.</p>
<p>When remote access is required, use more secure methods, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), recognizing VPNs may have vulnerabilities and should be updated to the most recent version available. Also recognize VPN is only as secure as its connected devices.</p>
<p>CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures.</p>
<p>CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices on the ICS webpage on cisa.gov. Several CISA products detailing cyber defense best practices are available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies.</p>
<p>CISA encourages organizations to implement recommended cybersecurity strategies for proactive defense of ICS assets. Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available on the ICS webpage at cisa.gov in the technical information paper, ICS-TIP-12-146-01B--Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation Strategies.</p>
<p>Organizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents.</p>
<hr>
<h2>Advisory Conversion Disclaimer</h2>
<p>This ICSA is a verbatim republication of Siemens ProductCERT SSA-470355 from a direct conversion of the vendor's Common Security Advisory Framework (CSAF) advisory. This is republished to CISA's website as a means of increasing visibility and is provided "as-is" for informational purposes only. CISA is not responsible for the editorial or technical accuracy of republished advisories and provides no warranties of any kind regarding any information contained within this advisory. Further, CISA does not endorse any commercial product or service. Please contact Siemens ProductCERT directly for any questions regarding this advisory.</p>
<h2>Revision History</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Initial Release Date: </strong>2026-07-14</li>
</ul>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">Date</th>
<th role="columnheader">Revision</th>
<th role="columnheader">Summary</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>2026-07-14</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>Publication Date</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2026-07-21</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>Initial CISA Republication of Siemens ProductCERT SSA-470355 advisory</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr>
<h2>Legal Notice and Terms of Use</h2>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Siemens SIDIS Secured SmartPlug]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[View CSAF
Summary
SIDIS Secured SmartPlug before V7.26.0310 is affected by multiple vulnerabilities in the components OpenSSL, OpenSSH, and several other packages as described below. Siemens has released a new version of SIDIS Secured SmartPlug and recommends to update to the latest version.
The ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684505/it-security-nachrichten/siemens-sidis-secured-smartplug/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684505/it-security-nachrichten/siemens-sidis-secured-smartplug/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:45:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-202-04.json"><strong>View CSAF</strong></a></p>
<h2>Summary</h2>
<p><strong>SIDIS Secured SmartPlug before V7.26.0310 is affected by multiple vulnerabilities in the components OpenSSL, OpenSSH, and several other packages as described below. Siemens has released a new version of SIDIS Secured SmartPlug and recommends to update to the latest version.</strong></p>
<p>The following versions of Siemens SIDIS Secured SmartPlug are affected:</p>
<ul>
<li>SIDIS Secured SmartPlug vers:intdot/&lt;7.26.0310 </li>
</ul>
<div class="csaf-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vendor</th>
<th role="columnheader">Equipment</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vulnerabilities</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>v3 9.8</td>
<td>Siemens</td>
<td>Siemens SIDIS Secured SmartPlug</td>
<td>Improper Enforcement of Message Integrity During Transmission in a Communication Channel, Reusing a Nonce, Key Pair in Encryption, Out-of-bounds Write, Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow'), Integer Overflow or Wraparound, Out-of-bounds Read, Covert Timing Channel, Detection of Error Condition Without Action, Incorrect Authorization</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<h3>Background</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Critical Infrastructure Sectors: </strong>Critical Manufacturing</li>
<li><strong>Countries/Areas Deployed: </strong>Worldwide</li>
<li><strong>Company Headquarters Location: </strong>Germany</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>Vulnerabilities</h2>
<div class="csaf-accordion">
<p><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle-all" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">Expand All +</a></p>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2022-23303</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>The implementations of SAE in hostapd before 2.10 and wpa_supplicant before 2.10 are vulnerable to side channel attacks as a result of cache access patterns. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-9494.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23303">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SIDIS Secured SmartPlug</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>SIDIS Secured SmartPlug &lt; V7.26.0310</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V7.26.0310 or later version</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/924.html">CWE-924 Improper Enforcement of Message Integrity During Transmission in a Communication Channel</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>9.8</td>
<td>CRITICAL</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2022-23304</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>The implementations of EAP-pwd in hostapd before 2.10 and wpa_supplicant before 2.10 are vulnerable to side-channel attacks as a result of cache access patterns. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-9495.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-23304">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SIDIS Secured SmartPlug</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>SIDIS Secured SmartPlug &lt; V7.26.0310</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V7.26.0310 or later version</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/924.html">CWE-924 Improper Enforcement of Message Integrity During Transmission in a Communication Channel</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2022-37660</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>In hostapd 2.10 and earlier, the PKEX code remains active even after a successful PKEX association. An attacker that successfully bootstrapped public keys with another entity using PKEX in the past, will be able to subvert a future bootstrapping by passively observing public keys, re-using the encrypting element Qi and subtracting it from the captured message M (X = M - Qi). This will result in the public ephemeral key X; the only element required to subvert the PKEX association.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-37660">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SIDIS Secured SmartPlug</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>SIDIS Secured SmartPlug &lt; V7.26.0310</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V7.26.0310 or later version</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/323.html">CWE-323 Reusing a Nonce, Key Pair in Encryption</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>6.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2022-48174</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>There is a stack overflow vulnerability in ash.c:6030 in busybox before 1.35. In the environment of Internet of Vehicles, this vulnerability can be executed from command to arbitrary code execution.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-48174">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SIDIS Secured SmartPlug</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>SIDIS Secured SmartPlug &lt; V7.26.0310</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V7.26.0310 or later version</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/787.html">CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.8</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-5222</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A stack buffer overflow was found in Internationl components for unicode (ICU ). While running the genrb binary, the 'subtag' struct overflowed at the SRBRoot::addTag function. This issue may lead to memory corruption and local arbitrary code execution.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5222">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SIDIS Secured SmartPlug</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>SIDIS Secured SmartPlug &lt; V7.26.0310</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V7.26.0310 or later version</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/120.html">CWE-120 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-5914</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A vulnerability has been identified in the libarchive library, specifically within the archive_read_format_rar_seek_data() function. This flaw involves an integer overflow that can ultimately lead to a double-free condition. Exploiting a double-free vulnerability can result in memory corruption, enabling an attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial-of-service condition.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-5914">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SIDIS Secured SmartPlug</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>SIDIS Secured SmartPlug &lt; V7.26.0310</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V7.26.0310 or later version</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/190.html">CWE-190 Integer Overflow or Wraparound</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.8</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-9230</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>Issue summary: An application trying to decrypt CMS messages encrypted using password based encryption can trigger an out-of-bounds read and write. Impact summary: This out-of-bounds read may trigger a crash which leads to Denial of Service for an application. The out-of-bounds write can cause a memory corruption which can have various consequences including a Denial of Service or Execution of attacker-supplied code. Although the consequences of a successful exploit of this vulnerability could be severe, the probability that the attacker would be able to perform it is low. Besides, password based (PWRI) encryption support in CMS messages is very rarely used. For that reason the issue was assessed as Moderate severity according to our Security Policy. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the CMS implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9230">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SIDIS Secured SmartPlug</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>SIDIS Secured SmartPlug &lt; V7.26.0310</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V7.26.0310 or later version</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/125.html">CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.5</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-9231</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote recovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit ARM platforms. Impact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit ARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker.. While remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter, timing measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack. OpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so this CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts. However, given that it is possible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled with the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be recoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate severity issue. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9231">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SIDIS Secured SmartPlug</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>SIDIS Secured SmartPlug &lt; V7.26.0310</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V7.26.0310 or later version</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/385.html">CWE-385 Covert Timing Channel</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>6.5</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-9232</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>Issue summary: An application using the OpenSSL HTTP client API functions may trigger an out-of-bounds read if the 'no_proxy' environment variable is set and the host portion of the authority component of the HTTP URL is an IPv6 address. Impact summary: An out-of-bounds read can trigger a crash which leads to Denial of Service for an application. The OpenSSL HTTP client API functions can be used directly by applications but they are also used by the OCSP client functions and CMP (Certificate Management Protocol) client implementation in OpenSSL. However the URLs used by these implementations are unlikely to be controlled by an attacker. In this vulnerable code the out of bounds read can only trigger a crash. Furthermore the vulnerability requires an attacker-controlled URL to be passed from an application to the OpenSSL function and the user has to have a 'no_proxy' environment variable set. For the aforementioned reasons the issue was assessed as Low severity. The vulnerable code was introduced in the following patch releases: 3.0.16, 3.1.8, 3.2.4, 3.3.3, 3.4.0 and 3.5.0. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the HTTP client implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9232">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SIDIS Secured SmartPlug</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>SIDIS Secured SmartPlug &lt; V7.26.0310</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V7.26.0310 or later version</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/125.html">CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>5.9</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-26465</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A vulnerability was found in OpenSSH when the VerifyHostKeyDNS option is enabled. A machine-in-the-middle attack can be performed by a malicious machine impersonating a legit server. This issue occurs due to how OpenSSH mishandles error codes in specific conditions when verifying the host key. For an attack to be considered successful, the attacker needs to manage to exhaust the client's memory resource first, turning the attack complexity high.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-26465">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SIDIS Secured SmartPlug</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>SIDIS Secured SmartPlug &lt; V7.26.0310</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V7.26.0310 or later version</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/390.html">CWE-390 Detection of Error Condition Without Action</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>6.8</td>
<td>MEDIUM</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2025-32462</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>Sudo before 1.9.17p1, when used with a sudoers file that specifies a host that is neither the current host nor ALL, allows listed users to execute commands on unintended machines.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-32462">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SIDIS Secured SmartPlug</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>SIDIS Secured SmartPlug &lt; V7.26.0310</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V7.26.0310 or later version</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/863.html">CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>2.8</td>
<td>LOW</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N">CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-5121</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>A flaw was found in libarchive. On 32-bit systems, an integer overflow vulnerability exists in the zisofs block pointer allocation logic. A remote attacker can exploit this by providing a specially crafted ISO9660 image, which can lead to a heap buffer overflow. This could potentially allow for arbitrary code execution on the affected system.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-5121">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens SIDIS Secured SmartPlug</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>SIDIS Secured SmartPlug &lt; V7.26.0310</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V7.26.0310 or later version</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/190.html">CWE-190 Integer Overflow or Wraparound</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>7.5</td>
<td>HIGH</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<h2>Acknowledgments</h2>
<ul>
<li>Siemens ProductCERT reported these vulnerabilities to CISA.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>General Recommendations</h2>
<p>As a general security measure, Siemens strongly recommends to protect network access to devices with appropriate mechanisms. In order to operate the devices in a protected IT environment, Siemens recommends to configure the environment according to Siemens' operational guidelines for Industrial Security (Download: https://www.siemens.com/cert/operational-guidelines-industrial-security), and to follow the recommendations in the product manuals. Additional information on Industrial Security by Siemens can be found at: https://www.siemens.com/industrialsecurity</p>
<hr>
<h2>Additional Resources</h2>
<p>For further inquiries on security vulnerabilities in Siemens products and solutions, please contact the Siemens ProductCERT: https://www.siemens.com/cert/advisories</p>
<hr>
<h2>Terms of Use</h2>
<p>The use of Siemens Security Advisories is subject to the terms and conditions listed on: https://www.siemens.com/productcert/terms-of-use.</p>
<hr>
<h2>Legal Notice and Terms of Use</h2>
<p>This product is provided subject to this Notification (https://www.cisa.gov/notification) and this Privacy &amp; Use policy (https://www.cisa.gov/privacy-policy).</p>
<hr>
<h2>Recommended Practices</h2>
<p>CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the exploitation risk of this vulnerability.</p>
<p>Minimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems, and ensure they are not accessible from the internet.</p>
<p>Locate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls and isolate them from business networks.</p>
<p>When remote access is required, use more secure methods, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), recognizing VPNs may have vulnerabilities and should be updated to the most recent version available. Also recognize VPN is only as secure as its connected devices.</p>
<p>CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures.</p>
<p>CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices on the ICS webpage on cisa.gov. Several CISA products detailing cyber defense best practices are available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies.</p>
<p>CISA encourages organizations to implement recommended cybersecurity strategies for proactive defense of ICS assets. Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available on the ICS webpage at cisa.gov in the technical information paper, ICS-TIP-12-146-01B--Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation Strategies.</p>
<p>Organizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents.</p>
<hr>
<h2>Advisory Conversion Disclaimer</h2>
<p>This ICSA is a verbatim republication of Siemens ProductCERT SSA-585531 from a direct conversion of the vendor's Common Security Advisory Framework (CSAF) advisory. This is republished to CISA's website as a means of increasing visibility and is provided "as-is" for informational purposes only. CISA is not responsible for the editorial or technical accuracy of republished advisories and provides no warranties of any kind regarding any information contained within this advisory. Further, CISA does not endorse any commercial product or service. Please contact Siemens ProductCERT directly for any questions regarding this advisory.</p>
<h2>Revision History</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Initial Release Date: </strong>2026-07-14</li>
</ul>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">Date</th>
<th role="columnheader">Revision</th>
<th role="columnheader">Summary</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>2026-07-14</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>Publication Date</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2026-07-21</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>Initial CISA Republication of Siemens ProductCERT SSA-585531 advisory</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr>
<h2>Legal Notice and Terms of Use</h2>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Siemens Opcenter X]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[View CSAF
Summary
Opcenter X before V2604 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability that could allow an attacker to gain full unauthorized access to the application. Siemens has released a new version for Opcenter X and recommends to update to the latest version.
The following versions of Si...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684503/it-security-nachrichten/siemens-opcenter-x/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684503/it-security-nachrichten/siemens-opcenter-x/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:45:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-202-03.json"><strong>View CSAF</strong></a></p>
<h2>Summary</h2>
<p><strong>Opcenter X before V2604 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability that could allow an attacker to gain full unauthorized access to the application. Siemens has released a new version for Opcenter X and recommends to update to the latest version.</strong></p>
<p>The following versions of Siemens Opcenter X are affected:</p>
<ul>
<li>Opcenter X vers:intdot/&lt;2604</li>
</ul>
<div class="csaf-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vendor</th>
<th role="columnheader">Equipment</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vulnerabilities</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>v3 10</td>
<td>Siemens</td>
<td>Siemens Opcenter X</td>
<td>Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<h3>Background</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Critical Infrastructure Sectors: </strong>Critical Manufacturing</li>
<li><strong>Countries/Areas Deployed: </strong>Worldwide</li>
<li><strong>Company Headquarters Location: </strong>Germany</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>Vulnerabilities</h2>
<div class="csaf-accordion">
<p><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle-all" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">Expand All +</a></p>
<div class="csaf-accordion-item">
<h3><a class="csaf-accordion-toggle" href="https://www.cisa.gov/#">CVE-2026-56451</a></h3>
<div class="csaf-accordion-content">
<p>Affected applications do not properly validate the algorithm specified in the JSON Web Token (JWT) header. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to forge arbitrary JWT, bypass authentication mechanisms and impersonate any user including administrative accounts, potentially gaining full unauthorized access to the application.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-56451">View CVE Details</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Affected Products</h4>
<h5>Siemens Opcenter X</h5>
<div class="ics-vendor-version-status">
<div class="ics-vendor"><strong>Vendor:</strong><br>Siemens</div>
<div class="ics-version"><strong>Product Version:</strong><br>Opcenter X &lt; V2604</div>
<div class="ics-status"><strong>Product Status:</strong><br>known_affected</div>
</div>
<div class="ics-remediations">
<h6>Remediations</h6>
<p><strong>Vendor fix</strong><br>Update to V2604 or later version<br><a href="https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/206159703/">https://support.sw.siemens.com/product/206159703/</a></p>
</div>
<p><strong>Relevant CWE:</strong> <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/347.html">CWE-347 Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature</a></p>
<hr>
<h4>Metrics</h4>
<div class="csaf-table csaf-metrics-table">
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">CVSS Version</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Score</th>
<th role="columnheader">Base Severity</th>
<th role="columnheader">Vector String</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>CRITICAL</td>
<td><a href="https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1#CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H">CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<h2>Acknowledgments</h2>
<ul>
<li>Siemens ProductCERT reported this vulnerability to CISA.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
<h2>General Recommendations</h2>
<p>As a general security measure, Siemens strongly recommends to protect network access to devices with appropriate mechanisms. In order to operate the devices in a protected IT environment, Siemens recommends to configure the environment according to Siemens' operational guidelines for Industrial Security (Download: https://www.siemens.com/cert/operational-guidelines-industrial-security), and to follow the recommendations in the product manuals. Additional information on Industrial Security by Siemens can be found at: https://www.siemens.com/industrialsecurity</p>
<hr>
<h2>Additional Resources</h2>
<p>For further inquiries on security vulnerabilities in Siemens products and solutions, please contact the Siemens ProductCERT: https://www.siemens.com/cert/advisories</p>
<hr>
<h2>Terms of Use</h2>
<p>The use of Siemens Security Advisories is subject to the terms and conditions listed on: https://www.siemens.com/productcert/terms-of-use.</p>
<hr>
<h2>Legal Notice and Terms of Use</h2>
<p>This product is provided subject to this Notification (https://www.cisa.gov/notification) and this Privacy &amp; Use policy (https://www.cisa.gov/privacy-policy).</p>
<hr>
<h2>Recommended Practices</h2>
<p>CISA recommends users take defensive measures to minimize the exploitation risk of these vulnerabilities.</p>
<p>Minimize network exposure for all control system devices and/or systems, and ensure they are not accessible from the internet.</p>
<p>Locate control system networks and remote devices behind firewalls and isolate them from business networks.</p>
<p>When remote access is required, use more secure methods, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), recognizing VPNs may have vulnerabilities and should be updated to the most recent version available. Also recognize VPN is only as secure as its connected devices.</p>
<p>CISA reminds organizations to perform proper impact analysis and risk assessment prior to deploying defensive measures.</p>
<p>CISA also provides a section for control systems security recommended practices on the ICS webpage on cisa.gov. Several CISA products detailing cyber defense best practices are available for reading and download, including Improving Industrial Control Systems Cybersecurity with Defense-in-Depth Strategies.</p>
<p>CISA encourages organizations to implement recommended cybersecurity strategies for proactive defense of ICS assets. Additional mitigation guidance and recommended practices are publicly available on the ICS webpage at cisa.gov in the technical information paper, ICS-TIP-12-146-01B--Targeted Cyber Intrusion Detection and Mitigation Strategies.</p>
<p>Organizations observing suspected malicious activity should follow established internal procedures and report findings to CISA for tracking and correlation against other incidents.</p>
<hr>
<h2>Advisory Conversion Disclaimer</h2>
<p>This ICSA is a verbatim republication of Siemens ProductCERT SSA-096828 from a direct conversion of the vendor's Common Security Advisory Framework (CSAF) advisory. This is republished to CISA's website as a means of increasing visibility and is provided "as-is" for informational purposes only. CISA is not responsible for the editorial or technical accuracy of republished advisories and provides no warranties of any kind regarding any information contained within this advisory. Further, CISA does not endorse any commercial product or service. Please contact Siemens ProductCERT directly for any questions regarding this advisory.</p>
<h2>Revision History</h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Initial Release Date: </strong>2026-07-14</li>
</ul>
<table class="tablesaw tablesaw-stack" data-tablesaw-mode="stack" data-tablesaw-minimap>
<thead>
<tr>
<th role="columnheader" data-tablesaw-priority="persist">Date</th>
<th role="columnheader">Revision</th>
<th role="columnheader">Summary</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>2026-07-14</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>Publication Date</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2026-07-21</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>Initial CISA Republication of Siemens ProductCERT SSA-096828 advisory</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr>
<h2>Legal Notice and Terms of Use</h2>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why Do Some Proxies Work Fine for Search But Fail Once You Start Filtering Results?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Automated web scraping, market intelligence data gathering, and large-scale search engine extraction platforms frequently hit an invisible wall. A collection of proxy IPs might execute initial search queries flawlessly, yielding a standard 200 OK status code and complete HTML payloads.…
Read more...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684487/it-security-nachrichten/why-do-some-proxies-work-fine-for-search-but-fail-once-you-start-filtering-results/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684487/it-security-nachrichten/why-do-some-proxies-work-fine-for-search-but-fail-once-you-start-filtering-results/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:44:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Automated web scraping, market intelligence data gathering, and large-scale search engine extraction platforms frequently hit an invisible wall. A collection of proxy IPs might execute initial search queries flawlessly, yielding a standard 200 OK status code and complete HTML payloads.…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/why-do-some-proxies-work-fine-for-search-but-fail-once-you-start-filtering-results/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/why-do-some-proxies-work-fine-for-search-but-fail-once-you-start-filtering-results/">Why Do Some Proxies Work Fine for Search But Fail Once You Start Filtering Results?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Validating Distributed LLM Serving Benchmarks with NVIDIA srt-slurm, SLURM Recipes, Parameter Sweeps, and Pareto Analysis]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In this tutorial, we explore NVIDIA’s srt-slurm framework and learn how we use srtctl to convert declarative YAML configurations into reproducible SLURM benchmark workflows for distributed LLM serving. We set up the project in Google Colab, inspect its internal architecture, define a cluster conf...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684374/ai-nachrichten/validating-distributed-llm-serving-benchmarks-with-nvidia-srt-slurm-slurm-recipes-parameter-sweeps-and-pareto-analysis/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684374/ai-nachrichten/validating-distributed-llm-serving-benchmarks-with-nvidia-srt-slurm-slurm-recipes-parameter-sweeps-and-pareto-analysis/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:35:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this tutorial, we explore NVIDIA’s srt-slurm framework and learn how we use srtctl to convert declarative YAML configurations into reproducible SLURM benchmark workflows for distributed LLM serving. We set up the project in Google Colab, inspect its internal architecture, define a cluster configuration, dry-run built-in and custom recipes, and model a disaggregated prefill-and-decode deployment […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.marktechpost.com/2026/07/21/validating-distributed-llm-serving-benchmarks-with-nvidia-srt-slurm-slurm-recipes-parameter-sweeps-and-pareto-analysis/">Validating Distributed LLM Serving Benchmarks with NVIDIA srt-slurm, SLURM Recipes, Parameter Sweeps, and Pareto Analysis</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.marktechpost.com/">MarkTechPost</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[SAP developers face education debt, user group warns]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Many enterprises are investing tens of millions in modernizing their SAP landscapes, but are often underestimating a crucial factor for success, the training of their own developers, according to the German-Speaking SAP User Group, DSAG.



The user association urges CIOs to treat the continuing ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684227/it-nachrichten/sap-developers-face-education-debt-user-group-warns/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684227/it-nachrichten/sap-developers-face-education-debt-user-group-warns/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:50:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many enterprises are investing tens of millions in modernizing their SAP landscapes, but are often underestimating a crucial factor for success, the training of their own developers, according to the German-Speaking SAP User Group, DSAG.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The user association urges CIOs to treat the continuing education of SAP developers not as a voluntary training measure but as a strategic investment program in a new <a href="https://impulsant.dsag.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/CIO-Upskilling.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">report on upskilling</a> [PDF, in German]. Well-trained developers are essential for building stable, maintainable in-house projects without accumulating technical debt, but without continuing education during the upgrade to S/4HANA, the potential of the new technologies will remain untapped, it warned.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Outdated expertise becomes a project risk</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As the authors explain, while many ABAP developers have decades of experience with SAP R/3 or ECC and possess extensive process knowledge, development paradigms have fundamentally changed with S/4HANA, Clean Core, and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/189599/sap-doubles-down-on-citizen-developer-strategy.html#:~:text=There%E2%80%99s%20also%20a,cloud%2C%E2%80%9D%20says%20Mueller.">ABAP Cloud</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the long term, this threatens to lead to poor architectural decisions, time-consuming workarounds, and in-house developments that will need to be maintained with every release, according to DSAG. Many business consultants, too, are still relying too heavily on classic GUI transactions and not taking modern Fiori technologies sufficiently into account.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The result is what the SAP user group refers to as “skills debt.” This debt remains invisible at first but later becomes apparent in the form of longer projects, rising maintenance costs, and a growing dependence on external service providers.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Skill building must start before the project</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The DSAG authors view the timing of training as particularly critical. Those who wait until an ongoing S/4HANA migration project is underway to begin building expertise significantly increase the project risk. A lack of knowledge about CDS, RAP, or Fiori leads to architectural decisions that must later be corrected at great expense. At the same time, the necessary learning effort can hardly be managed alongside day-to-day business operations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But even after the migration is complete, SAP developers must continue their training, according to DSAG. The authors warn that anyone who continues to work as they did on ECC will miss out on the opportunities offered by current SAP technologies — even if everything still works technically. At the same time, they can immediately apply what they’ve learned, which helps solidify their new knowledge.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI no replacement for developer expertise</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4197428/sap-study-ai-pays-off-but-governance-is-lagging-behind.html">AI tools can generate and explain code</a>, this requires that developers be able to evaluate the results from a technical perspective, and according to DSAG the same applies to development in the SAP environment: “Only those who understand what constitutes good SAP code can use AI as an accelerator,” the authors write. Otherwise, AI acts as a risk amplifier and, in the worst case, merely accelerates the accumulation of technical debt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The prerequisites for successful AI deployment are solid software engineering knowledge, automated testing, and an understanding of modern SAP development.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">DSAG’s five recommendations</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">DSAG recommends that CIOs firmly integrate continuing education into their transformation strategy with five measures:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>defining mandatory learning paths for different roles, such as ABAP, CAP, or integration developers, as well as business consultants,</li>



<li>providing suitable sandbox and test environments,</li>



<li>mandatorily including training time in capacity planning,</li>



<li>coordinating training schedules with migration and modernization projects, and</li>



<li>using existing DSAG guidelines as a reference framework for development.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[KeeperPAM strengthens privileged access management for global construction SaaS provider Asite]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Keeper Security has announced that UK-based construction technology provider Asite has deployed KeeperPAM® to strengthen privileged access management, secrets governance and credential security across its global operations. The deployment, detailed in a newly published customer case study, sees A...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3684134/it-security-nachrichten/keeperpam-strengthens-privileged-access-management-for-global-construction-saas-provider-asite/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3684134/it-security-nachrichten/keeperpam-strengthens-privileged-access-management-for-global-construction-saas-provider-asite/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:09:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keeper Security has announced that UK-based construction technology provider Asite has deployed KeeperPAM® to strengthen privileged access management, secrets governance and credential security across its global operations. The deployment, detailed in a newly published customer case study, sees Asite replace a collection of legacy privileged access and secrets management tools with Keeper’s unified, cloud-native platform […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecurityguru.org/2026/07/21/keeperpam-strengthens-privileged-access-management-for-global-construction-saas-provider-asite/">KeeperPAM strengthens privileged access management for global construction SaaS provider Asite</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecurityguru.org/">IT Security Guru</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Das ist der Deepseek 2.0 Moment]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: The Morpheus Tutorials - Bewertung: 21x - Views:188 Kimi K3 zeigt, dass Open Weight Modelle definitiv nichht mehr weit weg sind von den besten der besten.

Quellen:
https://www.kimi.com/blog/kimi-k3
https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart
https://x.com/Kimi_Moonshot/status/...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683973/video/das-ist-der-deepseek-20-moment/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683973/video/das-ist-der-deepseek-20-moment/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 16:12:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: The Morpheus Tutorials - Bewertung: 21x - Views:188 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/vqNvkkhyEms?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Kimi K3 zeigt, dass Open Weight Modelle definitiv nichht mehr weit weg sind von den besten der besten.<br />
<br />
Quellen:<br />
https://www.kimi.com/blog/kimi-k3<br />
https://platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/kimi-k3-quickstart<br />
https://x.com/Kimi_Moonshot/status/2078855608565207130<br />
https://x.com/cramforce/status/2078574147333152957<br />
https://www.blender.org/lab/mcp-server/<br />
https://openrouter.ai/moonshotai/kimi-k3<br />
<br />
Blender Benchmark auf Github: <br />
https://github.com/TheMorpheus407/hogwarts-blender-benchmark<br />
<br />
MorphCook Benchmark auf Github:<br />
https://github.com/TheMorpheus407/morphcook/<br />
<br />
MorphCook:<br />
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.themorpheus.morphcook<br />
<br />
Zum MorphReader: <br />
Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.themorpheus.morph_reader_app<br />
Apple: https://apps.apple.com/de/app/morphreader/id6741467699?platform=iphone<br />
<br />
RSS Feed: https://www.patreon.com/collection/880029?view=expanded<br />
<br />
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/themorpheustuts/<br />
<br />
Meine anderen Kanäle und Projekte: the-morpheus.de/<br />
<br />
_Selbst *kostenlos Informatik lernen* auf meiner Website:_ https://bootstrap.academy/<br />
<br />
_Discord:_<br />
https://the-morpheus.de/discord.html<br />
<br />
_Unterstützt mich - Danke!:_<br />
https://www.patreon.com/user?u=5322110<br />
https://www.paypal.me/TheMorpheus<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New CAV3RN Module Replaces WebSocket C2 With Outlook Calendar Dead Drops]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In a significant evolution of the Project CAV3RN tooling, a new .NET Native AOT communication module dubbed AzureCommunication.dll has been deployed to replace the framework’s earlier HTTP/WebSocket C2 component. A stealthy channel that abuses Outlook calendar events over Microsoft Graph and a DN...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683889/it-security-nachrichten/new-cav3rn-module-replaces-websocket-c2-with-outlook-calendar-dead-drops/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683889/it-security-nachrichten/new-cav3rn-module-replaces-websocket-c2-with-outlook-calendar-dead-drops/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:40:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a significant evolution of the Project CAV3RN tooling, a new .NET Native AOT communication module dubbed AzureCommunication.dll has been deployed to replace the framework’s earlier HTTP/WebSocket C2 component. A stealthy channel that abuses Outlook calendar events over Microsoft Graph and a DNS-based recovery mechanism for Microsoft 365 credentials. This shift reinforces CAV3RN’s positioning as […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://gbhackers.com/cav3rn-module-replaces-websocket-c2/">New CAV3RN Module Replaces WebSocket C2 With Outlook Calendar Dead Drops</a> appeared first on <a href="https://gbhackers.com/">GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hackers Hide Malware Commands in Outlook Events Dated 2050 and Use as C2 Channel]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A newly identified malware component linked to the Project CAV3RN framework is abusing Microsoft Outlook calendar events scheduled for 2050 to conceal command-and-control (C2) traffic. The tool also uses DNS AAAA responses as a fallback channel to restore Microsoft Graph…
Read more →
The post Hac...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683879/it-security-nachrichten/hackers-hide-malware-commands-in-outlook-events-dated-2050-and-use-as-c2-channel/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683879/it-security-nachrichten/hackers-hide-malware-commands-in-outlook-events-dated-2050-and-use-as-c2-channel/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:39:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A newly identified malware component linked to the Project CAV3RN framework is abusing Microsoft Outlook calendar events scheduled for 2050 to conceal command-and-control (C2) traffic. The tool also uses DNS AAAA responses as a fallback channel to restore Microsoft Graph…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/hackers-hide-malware-commands-in-outlook-events-dated-2050-and-use-as-c2-channel/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/hackers-hide-malware-commands-in-outlook-events-dated-2050-and-use-as-c2-channel/">Hackers Hide Malware Commands in Outlook Events Dated 2050 and Use as C2 Channel</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New CAV3RN Module Replaces WebSocket C2 With Outlook Calendar Dead Drops]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In a significant evolution of the Project CAV3RN tooling, a new .NET Native AOT communication module dubbed AzureCommunication.dll has been deployed to replace the framework’s earlier HTTP/WebSocket C2 component. A stealthy channel that abuses Outlook calendar events over Microsoft Graph…
Read mo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683876/it-security-nachrichten/new-cav3rn-module-replaces-websocket-c2-with-outlook-calendar-dead-drops/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683876/it-security-nachrichten/new-cav3rn-module-replaces-websocket-c2-with-outlook-calendar-dead-drops/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:39:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a significant evolution of the Project CAV3RN tooling, a new .NET Native AOT communication module dubbed AzureCommunication.dll has been deployed to replace the framework’s earlier HTTP/WebSocket C2 component. A stealthy channel that abuses Outlook calendar events over Microsoft Graph…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/new-cav3rn-module-replaces-websocket-c2-with-outlook-calendar-dead-drops/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/new-cav3rn-module-replaces-websocket-c2-with-outlook-calendar-dead-drops/">New CAV3RN Module Replaces WebSocket C2 With Outlook Calendar Dead Drops</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Your CD and Blu-Ray collection won't last forever]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It's important to be aware of disc rot, but there's no need to be afraid.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683857/it-nachrichten/your-cd-and-blu-ray-collection-wont-last-forever/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683857/it-nachrichten/your-cd-and-blu-ray-collection-wont-last-forever/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:34:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's important to be aware of disc rot, but there's no need to be afraid.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Choose Wisely: AI-Generated Coding Risk Varies, A Lot]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AI-generated code introduces 15 vulnerabilities on average per codebase, but the actual risk depends on framework pairing more than the model used.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683827/it-security-nachrichten/choose-wisely-ai-generated-coding-risk-varies-a-lot/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683827/it-security-nachrichten/choose-wisely-ai-generated-coding-risk-varies-a-lot/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:25:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[AI-generated code introduces 15 vulnerabilities on average per codebase, but the actual risk depends on framework pairing more than the model used.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The AI allocation trap: Record spend, vanishing returns]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In a single month, one enterprise reportedly spent half a billion dollars on AI. A consultant told Axios that the client had handed its workforce AI licenses, set no usage limits and let the meter run until finance noticed. The figure is spectacular, and it is the wrong thing to fear. That half-b...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683786/it-nachrichten/the-ai-allocation-trap-record-spend-vanishing-returns/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683786/it-nachrichten/the-ai-allocation-trap-record-spend-vanishing-returns/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:18:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In a single month, one enterprise reportedly spent half a billion dollars on AI. A consultant <a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/05/28/ai-spending-roi-enterprise-costs">told Axios</a> that the client had handed its workforce AI licenses, set no usage limits and let the meter run until finance noticed. The figure is spectacular, and it is the wrong thing to fear. That half-billion-dollar accident is only the visible part of a quieter, far larger failure. <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2026-1-15-gartner-says-worldwide-ai-spending-will-total-2-point-5-trillion-dollars-in-2026">Worldwide AI spending is forecast to reach $2.52 trillion in 2026</a>, more than any technology category in a generation, and by the most cited measure, roughly 95 percent of it returns nothing. Boards read that as proof that the technology does not work. The evidence points somewhere less comfortable, and it is not a technology problem at all. Most boards cannot see it because they are reading the wrong number: They track failure when the number that matters is allocation. The discipline that separates the winners is not technical. It is how they allocate capital across time, and how willing they are to stop. The hardest discipline in the AI era is not adopting faster. It is allocating honestly and refusing to judge a three-year bet on a six-month cycle.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The number everyone quotes, and no one acts on</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The headline statistic is now familiar. MIT’s Project NANDA, in its 2025 study <a href="https://fortune.com/2025/08/18/mit-report-95-percent-generative-ai-pilots-at-companies-failing-cfo/">The GenAI Divide</a>, found that about 95 percent of enterprise generative AI pilots produced no measurable impact on the P&amp;L, while roughly 5 percent captured nearly all the value. <a href="https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en/news-insights/research/2025/10/generative-ai-shows-rapid-growth-but-yields-mixed-results">S&amp;P Global Market Intelligence</a> found that the share of companies abandoning most of their AI initiatives jumped from 17 percent to 42 percent in a single year, with the average organization scrapping 46 percent of its proofs-of-concept before production. <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-06-25-gartner-predicts-over-40-percent-of-agentic-ai-projects-will-be-canceled-by-end-of-2027">Gartner</a> expects more than 40 percent of agentic AI projects to be canceled by the end of 2027, citing escalating costs, unclear business value and inadequate risk controls. And the pattern predates generative AI: <a href="https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2680-1.html">RAND</a> found that more than 80 percent of AI projects fail, roughly twice the rate of comparable work that does not involve AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Read as a technology story, these numbers say AI does not work. Read correctly, they say something more useful. MIT’s own authors located the cause not in model quality but in a <a href="https://virtualizationreview.com/articles/2025/08/19/mit-report-finds-most-ai-business-investments-fail-reveals-genai-divide.aspx">learning and integration gap</a>. The winners were not running better models. They picked one problem, executed and worked well together. Purchased solutions reached production about 67 percent of the time, while internal builds succeeded roughly a third as often. <a href="https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2025-03-31-gartner-forecasts-worldwide-genai-spending-to-reach-644-billion-in-2025">Gartner’s own spending forecast</a> notes the same pivot, with CIOs scaling back ambitious internal builds in favor of commercial solutions that promise more predictable value. None of that is a verdict on the technology. It is a verdict on allocation: What gets funded, for how long and against which yardstick. The popular prescription, heard in every boardroom this year, is to measure harder and prove value sooner. That advice quietly repeats the mistake, because forcing a three-year bet to prove itself sooner is precisely how you kill it. The fix is not more measurement. It is measuring each bet against the right clock and subtracting the ones that miss.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The six-month cycle problem</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Return to that 95 percent, because the way it is measured is the whole argument. Much of the reported failure is judged on a short clock, with a pilot counted as a failure if it has not shown a measurable financial return within roughly six months. The single most quoted number in enterprise AI is therefore a six-month yardstick applied to every initiative, including the bets designed to pay back in three years. The headline failure rate is not only a measure of AI. It is a measure of impatience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most expensive mistake in enterprise AI is a timing error. Enterprises have been spending heavily on AI for more than two years, and 2026 is the year boards are demanding returns. The multi-year bets funded during the 2024 and 2025 scale-up are only now far enough along to be judged. When a board reviews an initiative, it applies the yardstick it knows, which is quarterly return. That yardstick is correct for an efficiency project and ruinous for a capability bet. A workflow automation that should pay back in two quarters and a foundational data and agent capability that pays back in three years are not the same instrument, yet they are reviewed in the same meeting against the same metric.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the heart of the divide. The 5 percent did not simply pick better projects. They judged each project against its own horizon. McKinsey’s enduring <a href="https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/enduring-ideas-the-three-horizons-of-growth">Three Horizons model</a> made this discipline standard in corporate strategy a generation ago: near-term, emerging and long-term bets are funded and measured differently. AI erased that discipline because the hype compressed every timeline into the current quarter. The result is two failure modes that appear opposite yet share a common root. Organizations kill three-year bets at month six because they miss a metric the bet was never designed to hit. And they keep funding six-month theater for years because it is visible, safe and never asked to prove a return. Both are allocation failures. Neither is a technology failure.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Subtraction is a strategy</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is a second discipline, the 5 percent share, and it is the one boards find hardest. They subtract. Every credible study of the failure rate describes the same chaotic pattern underneath it: Initiatives are <a href="https://www.ciodive.com/news/AI-project-fail-data-SPGlobal/742590/">abandoned late, without criteria</a>, after the money is spent and the credibility is gone. Disciplined organizations do the opposite. They decide the conditions for stopping before they start, and they stop on schedule. Subtraction is not the absence of strategy. It is the strategy. Capital removed from a failing bet is capital available for a surviving one, and the survivors are where the entire return lives.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This reframes the 42 percent abandonment figure. Abandonment is not the problem. Undisciplined abandonment is. An organization that liquidates a position the moment it breaches a pre-agreed kill line is practicing portfolio hygiene. An organization that lets a doomed pilot run until someone loses patience is paying full price for a lesson it could have bought at a discount. The 5 percent who won were not smarter. They were patient in the right places and ruthless in the wrong ones.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The HALT framework: Horizon, Allocation, Liquidation, Tracking</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Treating AI as a portfolio rather than a pile of pilots requires four disciplines, and the organizations that execute well put all four in place before the next funding cycle, not after the next failure. The name is deliberate. The discipline most enterprises lack is the willingness to halt the wrong bets in time to fund the right ones.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Component 1: Horizon. </strong>Classify every AI initiative by its true payoff horizon before it is funded. Horizon 1 covers efficiency plays that should return value within two quarters. Horizon 2 covers capability bets, data foundations, agent platforms and integration work that pays back in roughly 6 to 18 months. Horizon 3 covers transformation bets that take eighteen months to three years or longer. Each horizon carries its own success metric, set at funding time. A Horizon 1 yardstick never judges a Horizon 3 bet. This single rule prevents the most common and most expensive error in the portfolio.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Component 2: Allocation. </strong>Decide the split across horizons deliberately, as a board-level capital decision, not as the accidental sum of whatever pilots happened to win approval. A practical reference point, borrowed from decades of innovation-portfolio practice, is roughly 70% to near-term value, 20% to capability, and 10% to transformation. The exact ratio is yours; the discipline is to choose and defend it. The failure mode is an unmanaged portfolio: 90 percent scattered across disconnected Horizon 1 experiments, with nothing compounding into the Horizon 2 capability that the buy-and-integrate winners actually built.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Component 3: Liquidation. </strong>Attach a kill line to every initiative at the moment it is funded: A named milestone, a date and an owner empowered to stop it. If a bet misses its horizon-appropriate milestone, it is liquidated, and capital is reallocated on schedule without debate over sunk costs. The absence of a pre-agreed kill line is not patience. It is an unpriced liability that the board has almost certainly not been shown.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Component 4: Tracking. </strong>Report the portfolio to the board on a fixed cadence using a single instrument: The AI Portfolio Scorecard. Not a deck of project updates, but a single view of allocation by horizon, burn against milestone, liquidation decisions taken and capital reallocated to survivors. The cadence is the control. A portfolio reviewed once a year is a portfolio managed by hope.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>THE AI PORTFOLIO SCORECARD: SCORE EVERY INITIATIVE BEFORE IT IS FUNDED</strong></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><div class="overflow-table-wrapper"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><thead><tr><td><strong>Evaluation criterion</strong></td><td><strong>0</strong></td><td><strong>1</strong></td><td><strong>2</strong></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Horizon assigned (H1 / H2 / H3) and documented before funding</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Success metric matched to the horizon, not a default quarterly ROI</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Kill line set: Named milestone and date, agreed at funding</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Owner named with explicit authority to stop the initiative</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Fits a deliberate allocation band, not an accidental addition</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Odds-raising path documented: Buy or partner and an integration plan</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr></tbody></table> </div></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Score each criterion: 0 = not present, 1 = partially documented, 2 = fully verified. Total out of 12. Bands: 0 to 4 = DO NOT FUND  |  5 to 8 = CONDITIONAL  |  9 to 12 = FUND.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>THE LIQUIDATION GATE: RUN AT EVERY BOARD REVIEW BEFORE CONTINUING FUNDING</strong></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><div class="overflow-table-wrapper"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><thead><tr><td><strong>Review test</strong></td><td><strong>Status</strong></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Milestone for this horizon met or credibly on track</td><td>PASS / FAIL</td></tr><tr><td>Burn within plan to the next milestone</td><td>PASS / FAIL</td></tr><tr><td>Still fits the allocation band, with no quiet horizon drift</td><td>PASS / FAIL</td></tr><tr><td>Owner confirms continued strategic fit</td><td>PASS / FAIL</td></tr></tbody></table> </div></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Any unresolved FAIL = stop funding, liquidate the position, reallocate the capital to a survivor and record the decision on the scorecard.</em></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The cost of the timing error</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The financial case follows the pattern and is consistent. Consider two organizations that funded the same class of Horizon 3 bet: A domain-specific agent platform meant to compound over three years. The first review was conducted at month six against a quarterly return test, found no payback and killed it, booking the write-off as a lesson about AI being overhyped. Its competitor classified the same work as Horizon 3, set an 18-month capability milestone, protected funding through two review cycles and shipped to production within the window the work actually required. One organization spent its money to learn that it lacks allocation discipline. The other spent comparable money and now owns a capability its rival has abandoned and cannot quickly rebuild. The dollars on the two income statements are similar. The competitive positions are not.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The governance return the board has been waiting for</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Allocation discipline does two things at once. It stops the bleed by liquidating failures on a schedule rather than at the point of exhaustion. And it concentrates capital where the entire return lives, in the small number of bets that survive their horizon. The 5 percent figure is not a ceiling imposed by the technology. It is the current yield of an industry allocated by hype. An organization that classifies by horizon, allocates on purpose, liquidates on a line and tracks on a cadence is not trying to beat the technology. It is trying to beat its own indiscipline, and that is a far more winnable contest.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The board conversation about AI returns is coming for every organization, and it arrives the moment the spending outpaces the story. When it does, the CIO will be asked a simple question: Where did the money go? The leaders who can answer will not show a pile of pilots. They will show a portfolio: What was funded, against which horizon, what was liquidated and when, and what the survivors are now worth. Subtraction is a strategy. The only question is whether you are practicing it on purpose or about to learn it by accident.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hackers Hide Malware Commands in Outlook Events Dated 2050 and Use as C2 Channel]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A newly identified malware component linked to the Project CAV3RN framework is abusing Microsoft Outlook calendar events scheduled for 2050 to conceal command-and-control (C2) traffic. The tool also uses DNS AAAA responses as a fallback channel to restore Microsoft Graph credentials when cloud au...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683596/it-security-nachrichten/hackers-hide-malware-commands-in-outlook-events-dated-2050-and-use-as-c2-channel/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683596/it-security-nachrichten/hackers-hide-malware-commands-in-outlook-events-dated-2050-and-use-as-c2-channel/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:53:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A newly identified malware component linked to the Project CAV3RN framework is abusing Microsoft Outlook calendar events scheduled for 2050 to conceal command-and-control (C2) traffic. The tool also uses DNS AAAA responses as a fallback channel to restore Microsoft Graph credentials when cloud authentication fails. Kaspersky researchers have associated the activity with highly targeted cyberespionage […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/hackers-outlook-c2-channel/">Hackers Hide Malware Commands in Outlook Events Dated 2050 and Use as C2 Channel</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[US Police Now Armed With Israeli Spy Vans Simulating Mobile Phone Towers]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 quotes an X post by Josh Walkos, author of the Substack We the Free: If you thought Flock was bad check out Falconet. Falconet from Israeli company Cognyte serves as a cell tower simulator that intercepts cell phone data from all devices within range. Police mount...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683474/it-security-nachrichten/us-police-now-armed-with-israeli-spy-vans-simulating-mobile-phone-towers/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683474/it-security-nachrichten/us-police-now-armed-with-israeli-spy-vans-simulating-mobile-phone-towers/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:08:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Longtime Slashdot reader schwit1 quotes an X post by Josh Walkos, author of the Substack We the Free: If you thought Flock was bad check out Falconet. Falconet from Israeli company Cognyte serves as a cell tower simulator that intercepts cell phone data from all devices within range. Police mount these systems in Tahoes so the vehicles can collect information while driving through areas without any direct interaction with targets. This mobile approach generates ongoing records of phone locations and communications for everyone nearby rather than only suspects, which creates comprehensive movement profiles and bypasses traditional warrant requirements under the Fourth Amendment.
 
Cognyte sells the technology directly to U.S. agencies, as shown by the Texas Department of Public Safety purchase of four Tahoes where over three point eight million dollars went to the interception equipment. Adoption spreads through routine vehicle procurement with little external review of how the collected data is stored or shared. Once active the systems permit warrantless collection of private cell phone data across entire communities during normal patrols, which enables potential misuse and leaves individuals with no effective way to discover or contest the surveillance.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=US+Police+Now+Armed+With+Israeli+Spy+Vans+Simulating+Mobile+Phone+Towers%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fmobile.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F21%2F0541215%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmobile.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F21%2F0541215%2Fus-police-now-armed-with-israeli-spy-vans-simulating-mobile-phone-towers%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://mobile.slashdot.org/story/26/07/21/0541215/us-police-now-armed-with-israeli-spy-vans-simulating-mobile-phone-towers?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8576-1: Linux kernel (NVIDIA Tegra) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683452/unix-server/usn-8576-1-linux-kernel-nvidia-tegra-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683452/unix-server/usn-8576-1-linux-kernel-nvidia-tegra-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:01:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose sensitive information (kernel memory). (CVE-2023-45896)

It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM32 architecture;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - ATM drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - RNBD block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clocksource drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - CPU idle management framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - Arm Firmware Framework for ARMv8-A(FFA);
  - EFI core;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Multifunction device drivers;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - RapidIO drivers;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - RPMSG subsystem;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Texas Instruments SoC drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FAT file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - JFS file system;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Proc file system;
  - Pstore file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) subsystem;
  - Memory Management;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Kernel kexec() syscall;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Networking core;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - AppArmor security module;
  - Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel framework;
  - ALSA framework;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - AudioScience HPI driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
(CVE-2022-49803, CVE-2022-49961, CVE-2022-50073, CVE-2022-50116,
CVE-2022-50552, CVE-2023-52682, CVE-2023-52737, CVE-2023-53545,
CVE-2023-53596, CVE-2023-53629, CVE-2024-27389, CVE-2024-35865,
CVE-2024-36898, CVE-2024-36922, CVE-2024-41079, CVE-2024-46715,
CVE-2024-46770, CVE-2024-47809, CVE-2024-50012, CVE-2024-53221,
CVE-2024-56557, CVE-2024-56584, CVE-2024-56657, CVE-2024-56719,
CVE-2024-56727, CVE-2025-21712, CVE-2025-21739, CVE-2025-21863,
CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-23141, CVE-2025-37786, CVE-2025-38006,
CVE-2025-38105, CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38250, CVE-2025-38562,
CVE-2025-38626, CVE-2025-38659, CVE-2025-38710, CVE-2025-39748,
CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-40005, CVE-2025-40016, CVE-2025-40103,
CVE-2025-40323, CVE-2025-68206, CVE-2025-68239, CVE-2025-68256,
CVE-2025-68307, CVE-2025-68358, CVE-2025-71150, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71232, CVE-2025-71235, CVE-2025-71236,
CVE-2025-71237, CVE-2025-71238, CVE-2025-71239, CVE-2025-71265,
CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2025-71274, CVE-2025-71287,
CVE-2025-71292, CVE-2025-71304, CVE-2026-23031, CVE-2026-23066,
CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23141, CVE-2026-23157,
CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23204, CVE-2026-23220, CVE-2026-23221,
CVE-2026-23222, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23228, CVE-2026-23229,
CVE-2026-23234, CVE-2026-23235, CVE-2026-23236, CVE-2026-23237,
CVE-2026-23238, CVE-2026-23241, CVE-2026-23242, CVE-2026-23243,
CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23266, CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23289,
CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296,
CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23303, CVE-2026-23304,
CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23324,
CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340,
CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359,
CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368,
CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381,
CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23392,
CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397, CVE-2026-23398,
CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23434,
CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23442, CVE-2026-23444,
CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23456,
CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23462,
CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-31393, CVE-2026-31396,
CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407,
CVE-2026-31408, CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31411, CVE-2026-31415,
CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421, CVE-2026-31422,
CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425, CVE-2026-31427,
CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447,
CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31454, CVE-2026-31455,
CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467, CVE-2026-31469,
CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31480, CVE-2026-31483,
CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31494, CVE-2026-31495,
CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508,
CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31512, CVE-2026-31515,
CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523,
CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31545,
CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550, CVE-2026-31551,
CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31570,
CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586,
CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602,
CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616,
CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622,
CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626,
CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31630,
CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31656,
CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662,
CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31670,
CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674,
CVE-2026-31676, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680, CVE-2026-31681,
CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686, CVE-2026-31687,
CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696, CVE-2026-31697,
CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31716,
CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31726, CVE-2026-31728,
CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31747, CVE-2026-31748,
CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31754,
CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758, CVE-2026-31759,
CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763, CVE-2026-31770,
CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31780, CVE-2026-31781,
CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015, CVE-2026-43020,
CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028,
CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43040,
CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43046, CVE-2026-43047,
CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054,
CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061, CVE-2026-43062,
CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069,
CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079,
CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43089, CVE-2026-43093,
CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104,
CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43112,
CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43123, CVE-2026-43124, CVE-2026-43130,
CVE-2026-43132, CVE-2026-43133, CVE-2026-43134, CVE-2026-43135,
CVE-2026-43136, CVE-2026-43139, CVE-2026-43140, CVE-2026-43141,
CVE-2026-43145, CVE-2026-43147, CVE-2026-43148, CVE-2026-43149,
CVE-2026-43152, CVE-2026-43156, CVE-2026-43158, CVE-2026-43159,
CVE-2026-43163, CVE-2026-43168, CVE-2026-43171, CVE-2026-43180,
CVE-2026-43182, CVE-2026-43183, CVE-2026-43184, CVE-2026-43187,
CVE-2026-43190, CVE-2026-43194, CVE-2026-43196, CVE-2026-43202,
CVE-2026-43203, CVE-2026-43205, CVE-2026-43206, CVE-2026-43207,
CVE-2026-43209, CVE-2026-43211, CVE-2026-43218, CVE-2026-43223,
CVE-2026-43225, CVE-2026-43226, CVE-2026-43227, CVE-2026-43230,
CVE-2026-43231, CVE-2026-43232, CVE-2026-43233, CVE-2026-43236,
CVE-2026-43241, CVE-2026-43242, CVE-2026-43246, CVE-2026-43251,
CVE-2026-43255, CVE-2026-43257, CVE-2026-43261, CVE-2026-43262,
CVE-2026-43264, CVE-2026-43266, CVE-2026-43268, CVE-2026-43269,
CVE-2026-43270, CVE-2026-43273, CVE-2026-43275, CVE-2026-43277,
CVE-2026-43279, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43283, CVE-2026-43287,
CVE-2026-43289, CVE-2026-43291, CVE-2026-43295, CVE-2026-43296,
CVE-2026-43302, CVE-2026-43312, CVE-2026-43313, CVE-2026-43314,
CVE-2026-43315, CVE-2026-43316, CVE-2026-43324, CVE-2026-43327,
CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334,
CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342,
CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365,
CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43373, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381,
CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43405,
CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426,
CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428, CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430,
CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43449,
CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451, CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453,
CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43469,
CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476,
CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497,
CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836,
CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841,
CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45846,
CVE-2026-45847, CVE-2026-45848, CVE-2026-45852, CVE-2026-45856,
CVE-2026-45857, CVE-2026-45860, CVE-2026-45862, CVE-2026-45864,
CVE-2026-45866, CVE-2026-45867, CVE-2026-45868, CVE-2026-45869,
CVE-2026-45870, CVE-2026-45871, CVE-2026-45873, CVE-2026-45875,
CVE-2026-45879, CVE-2026-45883, CVE-2026-45885, CVE-2026-45890,
CVE-2026-45891, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45902, CVE-2026-45904,
CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45912, CVE-2026-45915, CVE-2026-45916,
CVE-2026-45919, CVE-2026-45920, CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45935,
CVE-2026-45936, CVE-2026-45941, CVE-2026-45946, CVE-2026-45948,
CVE-2026-45954, CVE-2026-45956, CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45960,
CVE-2026-45964, CVE-2026-45965, CVE-2026-45968, CVE-2026-45969,
CVE-2026-45970, CVE-2026-45974, CVE-2026-45978, CVE-2026-45983,
CVE-2026-45984, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987,
CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-46002, CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46006,
CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46015, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019,
CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46027,
CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46044,
CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050,
CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46064,
CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46080,
CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099,
CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108,
CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123,
CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46132,
CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149,
CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163,
CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46174,
CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186,
CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46212,
CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46227,
CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234,
CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46249, CVE-2026-46250,
CVE-2026-46253, CVE-2026-46259, CVE-2026-46267, CVE-2026-46270,
CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46275, CVE-2026-46285,
CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304,
CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-46328, CVE-2026-52911,
CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52914, CVE-2026-52915, CVE-2026-52916,
CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52921, CVE-2026-52922,
CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52926, CVE-2026-52931, CVE-2026-52954,
CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52962,
CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52982,
CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52992,
CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999,
CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004,
CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53016,
CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53037,
CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043,
CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048,
CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060,
CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065,
CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072,
CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53096,
CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53287,
CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296,
CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306, CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53320,
CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53379, CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63865,
CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64032, CVE-2026-64033, CVE-2026-64034,
CVE-2026-64039, CVE-2026-64046, CVE-2026-64047, CVE-2026-64055,
CVE-2026-64056, CVE-2026-64083, CVE-2026-64084, CVE-2026-64085,
CVE-2026-64086, CVE-2026-64087, CVE-2026-64088, CVE-2026-64089,
CVE-2026-64096, CVE-2026-64102, CVE-2026-64103, CVE-2026-64113,
CVE-2026-64114, CVE-2026-64115, CVE-2026-64125, CVE-2026-64133,
CVE-2026-64135, CVE-2026-64153, CVE-2026-64155, CVE-2026-64164,
CVE-2026-64165, CVE-2026-64166, CVE-2026-64168, CVE-2026-64173,
CVE-2026-64174, CVE-2026-64177, CVE-2026-64178, CVE-2026-64179,
CVE-2026-64185)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8574-1: Linux kernel (GCP FIPS) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683349/unix-server/usn-8574-1-linux-kernel-gcp-fips-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683349/unix-server/usn-8574-1-linux-kernel-gcp-fips-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:16:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - CXL (Compute Express Link) drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Fastrpc Driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Ethernet team driver;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Microchip PolarFire SoC system controller driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM TDX Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Memory Management;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Networking core;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - Landlock security;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Renesas ASoC drivers;
  - Samsung ASoC drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2025-21709, CVE-2025-22116, CVE-2025-38426, CVE-2025-39764,
CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40150, CVE-2025-68175, CVE-2025-68239,
CVE-2025-68334, CVE-2025-68736, CVE-2025-71152, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71203, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71269, CVE-2025-71287,
CVE-2025-71288, CVE-2026-22981, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22993,
CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23104, CVE-2026-23118,
CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23171,
CVE-2026-23207, CVE-2026-23226, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23244,
CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23246, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23255,
CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23276, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23285,
CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290,
CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23292, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296,
CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23302, CVE-2026-23303,
CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23306, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23308,
CVE-2026-23310, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23313, CVE-2026-23315,
CVE-2026-23317, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321,
CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23325, CVE-2026-23330, CVE-2026-23334,
CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340,
CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23347, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356,
CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23360, CVE-2026-23361,
CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23363, CVE-2026-23364, CVE-2026-23365,
CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23369, CVE-2026-23370,
CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23374, CVE-2026-23375, CVE-2026-23378,
CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23383,
CVE-2026-23386, CVE-2026-23387, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23389,
CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397,
CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23412,
CVE-2026-23413, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23418, CVE-2026-23419,
CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23426, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438,
CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23440, CVE-2026-23441, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23447, CVE-2026-23448,
CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23456,
CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23461,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23464, CVE-2026-23465,
CVE-2026-23468, CVE-2026-23470, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475,
CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31392, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31394, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400,
CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408,
CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31412, CVE-2026-31413, CVE-2026-31414,
CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31426, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31429,
CVE-2026-31430, CVE-2026-31432, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31434,
CVE-2026-31438, CVE-2026-31439, CVE-2026-31440, CVE-2026-31441,
CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31449, CVE-2026-31450,
CVE-2026-31451, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31453, CVE-2026-31454,
CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31458, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466,
CVE-2026-31467, CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31470, CVE-2026-31473,
CVE-2026-31474, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31477, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31482, CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31487,
CVE-2026-31488, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31492, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498,
CVE-2026-31499, CVE-2026-31500, CVE-2026-31502, CVE-2026-31503,
CVE-2026-31505, CVE-2026-31506, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508,
CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31511, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31516, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31519,
CVE-2026-31520, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523,
CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31525, CVE-2026-31527, CVE-2026-31528,
CVE-2026-31530, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31542,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31548, CVE-2026-31549,
CVE-2026-31550, CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31554,
CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31556, CVE-2026-31557, CVE-2026-31563,
CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31566, CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31575,
CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584,
CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588,
CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602,
CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31604, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606,
CVE-2026-31610, CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612, CVE-2026-31613,
CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618,
CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624,
CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628,
CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31638, CVE-2026-31639,
CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31645, CVE-2026-31646, CVE-2026-31648,
CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31655, CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31658,
CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664,
CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671,
CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31675,
CVE-2026-31677, CVE-2026-31678, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680,
CVE-2026-31681, CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686,
CVE-2026-31689, CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696,
CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700,
CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31704, CVE-2026-31705,
CVE-2026-31706, CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708, CVE-2026-31709,
CVE-2026-31711, CVE-2026-31712, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715,
CVE-2026-31716, CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31722,
CVE-2026-31723, CVE-2026-31724, CVE-2026-31725, CVE-2026-31726,
CVE-2026-31728, CVE-2026-31729, CVE-2026-31730, CVE-2026-31731,
CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31740, CVE-2026-31741,
CVE-2026-31747, CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751,
CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756,
CVE-2026-31758, CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762,
CVE-2026-31763, CVE-2026-31767, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-31770,
CVE-2026-31772, CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31779,
CVE-2026-31780, CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43007,
CVE-2026-43012, CVE-2026-43013, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015,
CVE-2026-43016, CVE-2026-43017, CVE-2026-43018, CVE-2026-43019,
CVE-2026-43020, CVE-2026-43023, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025,
CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030,
CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43036, CVE-2026-43040,
CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43044, CVE-2026-43046,
CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43049, CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051,
CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43056, CVE-2026-43057,
CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43059, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061,
CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43064, CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066,
CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073,
CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079,
CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43081, CVE-2026-43082, CVE-2026-43084,
CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43086, CVE-2026-43088, CVE-2026-43089,
CVE-2026-43091, CVE-2026-43092, CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43094,
CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104,
CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43107, CVE-2026-43109, CVE-2026-43110,
CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43119,
CVE-2026-43120, CVE-2026-43129, CVE-2026-43162, CVE-2026-43245,
CVE-2026-43252, CVE-2026-43265, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43324,
CVE-2026-43327, CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43330,
CVE-2026-43332, CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336,
CVE-2026-43338, CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342,
CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43345, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43355,
CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43359, CVE-2026-43360, CVE-2026-43361,
CVE-2026-43362, CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43366,
CVE-2026-43368, CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43371, CVE-2026-43372,
CVE-2026-43373, CVE-2026-43377, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381,
CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43395,
CVE-2026-43397, CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43408, CVE-2026-43409,
CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43412, CVE-2026-43413, CVE-2026-43415,
CVE-2026-43419, CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43421, CVE-2026-43424,
CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428,
CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43436,
CVE-2026-43437, CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43441, CVE-2026-43445,
CVE-2026-43448, CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451,
CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43455, CVE-2026-43456,
CVE-2026-43457, CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466,
CVE-2026-43467, CVE-2026-43468, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43471,
CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476,
CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43483, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43488,
CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43491, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43495,
CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43499, CVE-2026-43502,
CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838,
CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842,
CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846,
CVE-2026-45855, CVE-2026-45858, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45911,
CVE-2026-45920, CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45942, CVE-2026-45943,
CVE-2026-45956, CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986,
CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45989, CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994,
CVE-2026-45996, CVE-2026-45997, CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46002,
CVE-2026-46003, CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006,
CVE-2026-46007, CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012,
CVE-2026-46015, CVE-2026-46016, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019,
CVE-2026-46021, CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024,
CVE-2026-46026, CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46033,
CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46038, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041,
CVE-2026-46044, CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049,
CVE-2026-46050, CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053,
CVE-2026-46056, CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062,
CVE-2026-46063, CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46068,
CVE-2026-46069, CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073,
CVE-2026-46075, CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078,
CVE-2026-46079, CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083,
CVE-2026-46084, CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089,
CVE-2026-46090, CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46094,
CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102,
CVE-2026-46103, CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108,
CVE-2026-46110, CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113,
CVE-2026-46114, CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46120,
CVE-2026-46121, CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124,
CVE-2026-46125, CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128,
CVE-2026-46129, CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133,
CVE-2026-46136, CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139,
CVE-2026-46142, CVE-2026-46143, CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145,
CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151,
CVE-2026-46152, CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160,
CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46167,
CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173,
CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46176, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178,
CVE-2026-46179, CVE-2026-46180, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186,
CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191,
CVE-2026-46193, CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197,
CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201,
CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46207,
CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212,
CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220,
CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46229,
CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233,
CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238,
CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46280,
CVE-2026-46282, CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286, CVE-2026-46287,
CVE-2026-46291, CVE-2026-46292, CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294,
CVE-2026-46296, CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303,
CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46312,
CVE-2026-46314, CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52920,
CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52951,
CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958,
CVE-2026-52961, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964,
CVE-2026-52967, CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970,
CVE-2026-52974, CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52981,
CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986,
CVE-2026-52989, CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993,
CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001,
CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006,
CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014,
CVE-2026-53015, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022,
CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034,
CVE-2026-53035, CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039,
CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045,
CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049,
CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53058,
CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062,
CVE-2026-53063, CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066,
CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072,
CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076,
CVE-2026-53077, CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084,
CVE-2026-53085, CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093,
CVE-2026-53094, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098,
CVE-2026-53110, CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53115,
CVE-2026-53117, CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53126,
CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53287,
CVE-2026-53289, CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294,
CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304,
CVE-2026-53306, CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53320,
CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53374, CVE-2026-53375, CVE-2026-53376,
CVE-2026-53379, CVE-2026-63838, CVE-2026-63843, CVE-2026-63844,
CVE-2026-63845, CVE-2026-63846, CVE-2026-63847, CVE-2026-63848,
CVE-2026-63851, CVE-2026-63852, CVE-2026-63854, CVE-2026-63855,
CVE-2026-63856, CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63861, CVE-2026-63862,
CVE-2026-63865, CVE-2026-64164)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8575-1: Linux kernel vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683348/unix-server/usn-8575-1-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683348/unix-server/usn-8575-1-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:16:01 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maxim Suhanov discovered that the NTFS file system implementation in the
Linux kernel did not properly validate file name length in certain
situations, leading to an out-of-bounds read. An attacker could use this to
construct a malicious NTFS image that, when mounted and operated on, could
expose sensitive information (kernel memory). (CVE-2023-45896)

It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM32 architecture;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - MIPS architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - ATM drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - RNBD block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clocksource drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - CPU idle management framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - Arm Firmware Framework for ARMv8-A(FFA);
  - EFI core;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Multifunction device drivers;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - RapidIO drivers;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - RPMSG subsystem;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Texas Instruments SoC drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FAT file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - JFS file system;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Proc file system;
  - Pstore file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - RAS (Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) subsystem;
  - Memory Management;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Kernel kexec() syscall;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Networking core;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - AppArmor security module;
  - Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel framework;
  - ALSA framework;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - AudioScience HPI driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
(CVE-2022-49803, CVE-2022-49961, CVE-2022-50073, CVE-2022-50116,
CVE-2022-50552, CVE-2023-52682, CVE-2023-52737, CVE-2023-53545,
CVE-2023-53596, CVE-2023-53629, CVE-2024-27389, CVE-2024-35865,
CVE-2024-36898, CVE-2024-36922, CVE-2024-41079, CVE-2024-46715,
CVE-2024-46770, CVE-2024-47809, CVE-2024-50012, CVE-2024-53221,
CVE-2024-56557, CVE-2024-56584, CVE-2024-56657, CVE-2024-56719,
CVE-2024-56727, CVE-2025-21712, CVE-2025-21739, CVE-2025-21863,
CVE-2025-22107, CVE-2025-23141, CVE-2025-37786, CVE-2025-38006,
CVE-2025-38105, CVE-2025-38192, CVE-2025-38250, CVE-2025-38562,
CVE-2025-38626, CVE-2025-38659, CVE-2025-38710, CVE-2025-39748,
CVE-2025-39764, CVE-2025-40005, CVE-2025-40016, CVE-2025-40103,
CVE-2025-40323, CVE-2025-68206, CVE-2025-68239, CVE-2025-68256,
CVE-2025-68307, CVE-2025-68358, CVE-2025-71150, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71232, CVE-2025-71233, CVE-2025-71235,
CVE-2025-71236, CVE-2025-71237, CVE-2025-71238, CVE-2025-71239,
CVE-2025-71265, CVE-2025-71266, CVE-2025-71267, CVE-2025-71274,
CVE-2025-71287, CVE-2025-71292, CVE-2025-71304, CVE-2026-23031,
CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23141,
CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23204, CVE-2026-23220,
CVE-2026-23221, CVE-2026-23222, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23228,
CVE-2026-23229, CVE-2026-23234, CVE-2026-23235, CVE-2026-23236,
CVE-2026-23237, CVE-2026-23238, CVE-2026-23241, CVE-2026-23242,
CVE-2026-23243, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23266, CVE-2026-23270,
CVE-2026-23277, CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23286,
CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290, CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23293,
CVE-2026-23296, CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23303,
CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23318,
CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339,
CVE-2026-23340, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356, CVE-2026-23357,
CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23365, CVE-2026-23367,
CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23370, CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23379,
CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23391,
CVE-2026-23392, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397,
CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23420,
CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438, CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454,
CVE-2026-23456, CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400, CVE-2026-31405,
CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408, CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31411,
CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31446,
CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31450, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31454,
CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466, CVE-2026-31467,
CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31473, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498, CVE-2026-31507,
CVE-2026-31508, CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522,
CVE-2026-31523, CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31549, CVE-2026-31550,
CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31565,
CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578,
CVE-2026-31580, CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31585,
CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31588, CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594,
CVE-2026-31596, CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599,
CVE-2026-31602, CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31615,
CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619,
CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624, CVE-2026-31625,
CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628, CVE-2026-31629,
CVE-2026-31630, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31651,
CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31658, CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661,
CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664, CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667,
CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671, CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673,
CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31676, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680,
CVE-2026-31681, CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686,
CVE-2026-31687, CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696,
CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31701,
CVE-2026-31716, CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31726,
CVE-2026-31728, CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31747,
CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751, CVE-2026-31752,
CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756, CVE-2026-31758,
CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762, CVE-2026-31763,
CVE-2026-31770, CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31780,
CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015,
CVE-2026-43020, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027,
CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030, CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035,
CVE-2026-43040, CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43046,
CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051, CVE-2026-43052,
CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061,
CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066, CVE-2026-43068,
CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076,
CVE-2026-43079, CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43089,
CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103,
CVE-2026-43104, CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43110, CVE-2026-43111,
CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43123, CVE-2026-43124,
CVE-2026-43130, CVE-2026-43132, CVE-2026-43133, CVE-2026-43134,
CVE-2026-43135, CVE-2026-43136, CVE-2026-43139, CVE-2026-43140,
CVE-2026-43141, CVE-2026-43145, CVE-2026-43147, CVE-2026-43148,
CVE-2026-43149, CVE-2026-43152, CVE-2026-43156, CVE-2026-43158,
CVE-2026-43159, CVE-2026-43163, CVE-2026-43168, CVE-2026-43171,
CVE-2026-43180, CVE-2026-43182, CVE-2026-43183, CVE-2026-43184,
CVE-2026-43187, CVE-2026-43190, CVE-2026-43194, CVE-2026-43196,
CVE-2026-43200, CVE-2026-43202, CVE-2026-43203, CVE-2026-43205,
CVE-2026-43206, CVE-2026-43207, CVE-2026-43209, CVE-2026-43211,
CVE-2026-43218, CVE-2026-43223, CVE-2026-43225, CVE-2026-43226,
CVE-2026-43227, CVE-2026-43230, CVE-2026-43231, CVE-2026-43232,
CVE-2026-43233, CVE-2026-43236, CVE-2026-43241, CVE-2026-43242,
CVE-2026-43246, CVE-2026-43251, CVE-2026-43255, CVE-2026-43257,
CVE-2026-43261, CVE-2026-43262, CVE-2026-43264, CVE-2026-43266,
CVE-2026-43268, CVE-2026-43269, CVE-2026-43270, CVE-2026-43273,
CVE-2026-43275, CVE-2026-43277, CVE-2026-43279, CVE-2026-43281,
CVE-2026-43283, CVE-2026-43287, CVE-2026-43289, CVE-2026-43291,
CVE-2026-43295, CVE-2026-43296, CVE-2026-43302, CVE-2026-43312,
CVE-2026-43313, CVE-2026-43314, CVE-2026-43315, CVE-2026-43316,
CVE-2026-43324, CVE-2026-43327, CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329,
CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336, CVE-2026-43339,
CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342, CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43357,
CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43373,
CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381, CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43386,
CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43420,
CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428,
CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43439,
CVE-2026-43445, CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451,
CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459,
CVE-2026-43466, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473,
CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476, CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43484,
CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839,
CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843,
CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45847, CVE-2026-45848,
CVE-2026-45852, CVE-2026-45856, CVE-2026-45857, CVE-2026-45860,
CVE-2026-45862, CVE-2026-45864, CVE-2026-45866, CVE-2026-45867,
CVE-2026-45868, CVE-2026-45869, CVE-2026-45870, CVE-2026-45871,
CVE-2026-45873, CVE-2026-45875, CVE-2026-45879, CVE-2026-45883,
CVE-2026-45885, CVE-2026-45890, CVE-2026-45891, CVE-2026-45899,
CVE-2026-45902, CVE-2026-45904, CVE-2026-45911, CVE-2026-45912,
CVE-2026-45915, CVE-2026-45916, CVE-2026-45919, CVE-2026-45920,
CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45935, CVE-2026-45936, CVE-2026-45941,
CVE-2026-45946, CVE-2026-45948, CVE-2026-45954, CVE-2026-45956,
CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45960, CVE-2026-45964, CVE-2026-45965,
CVE-2026-45968, CVE-2026-45969, CVE-2026-45970, CVE-2026-45974,
CVE-2026-45978, CVE-2026-45983, CVE-2026-45984, CVE-2026-45985,
CVE-2026-45986, CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-46002,
CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46006, CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46015,
CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019, CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023,
CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46037,
CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46044, CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047,
CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050, CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46053,
CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072,
CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46088,
CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102,
CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46120,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46127,
CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133, CVE-2026-46137,
CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151,
CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178,
CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189,
CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206,
CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46219,
CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231,
CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238,
CVE-2026-46249, CVE-2026-46250, CVE-2026-46253, CVE-2026-46259,
CVE-2026-46267, CVE-2026-46270, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274,
CVE-2026-46275, CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46301,
CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46319,
CVE-2026-46328, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52914,
CVE-2026-52915, CVE-2026-52916, CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920,
CVE-2026-52921, CVE-2026-52922, CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52926,
CVE-2026-52931, CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957,
CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52969,
CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985,
CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52995,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002,
CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53011,
CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022,
CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040,
CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046,
CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050,
CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062,
CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069,
CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074,
CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53077, CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53088,
CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53128,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53294,
CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53369, CVE-2026-53379,
CVE-2026-63860, CVE-2026-63865, CVE-2026-64018, CVE-2026-64032,
CVE-2026-64033, CVE-2026-64034, CVE-2026-64039, CVE-2026-64046,
CVE-2026-64047, CVE-2026-64055, CVE-2026-64056, CVE-2026-64083,
CVE-2026-64084, CVE-2026-64085, CVE-2026-64086, CVE-2026-64087,
CVE-2026-64088, CVE-2026-64089, CVE-2026-64096, CVE-2026-64102,
CVE-2026-64103, CVE-2026-64113, CVE-2026-64114, CVE-2026-64115,
CVE-2026-64125, CVE-2026-64133, CVE-2026-64135, CVE-2026-64153,
CVE-2026-64155, CVE-2026-64164, CVE-2026-64165, CVE-2026-64166,
CVE-2026-64168, CVE-2026-64173, CVE-2026-64174, CVE-2026-64177,
CVE-2026-64178, CVE-2026-64179, CVE-2026-64185)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Small models, sovereign advantage: Why Australia should build its own AI edge]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For the past three years, the AI conversation has been dominated by scale. Bigger models, bigger compute clusters, bigger headlines. But the next wave of competitive advantage won’t come from who can rent the biggest model; it will come from who can build the smallest one that knows their busines...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683294/it-nachrichten/small-models-sovereign-advantage-why-australia-should-build-its-own-ai-edge/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683294/it-nachrichten/small-models-sovereign-advantage-why-australia-should-build-its-own-ai-edge/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:03:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For the past three years, the AI conversation has been dominated by scale. Bigger models, bigger compute clusters, bigger headlines. But the next wave of competitive advantage won’t come from who can rent the biggest model; it will come from who can build the smallest one that knows their business.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That model is the <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4119259/small-language-models-why-specialized-ai-agents-boost-resilience-and-protect-privacy.html">small language model (SLM)</a>: Compact, purpose-built, trained on an organization’s own data and run under that organization’s own governance. And it is about to become one of the most consequential strategic assets available to both the private and public sector.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The problem with renting intelligence</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Right now, most organizations consume AI the way they once consumed electricity from a single utility by plugging into a handful of frontier models built by a small number of global vendors. These models are extraordinary generalists. They are also, by design, generic. They are tuned to be safe, broad and useful to everyone, which means they are optimised for no one in particular.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s a problem for any organization trying to build genuine differentiation. If every competitor in your sector is calling the same foundation model with the same prompts, the model itself is not your edge. Your edge is what only you know, your proprietary data, your institutional judgement, your operating history. A generic model can’t see any of that unless you keep feeding it to them, turn after turn, at cost, with no lasting memory and no guarantee of where that data ends up.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An SLM flips that equation. Trained on an organization’s own document libraries, case histories, policy archives, transaction data and operational know-how, it becomes a model that thinks the way your organization thinks, because it was built from your organization’s accumulated judgement. It doesn’t need to be the smartest model in the world. It needs to be the most useful one for you.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve seen this play out directly. At one of Australia’s largest integrated tourism and cruise businesses, simultaneously a B2C retailer, a B2B distributor to thousands of agency and wholesale clients globally, an aggregator marketplace for more than 1,800 independent tourism operators, and a cruise operator with offshore shared services spanning finance, customer contact and content management. The constraint wasn’t a lack of access to large general-purpose models. It was that none of them understood the business: 1,800 different operator catalogues, each with its own pricing logic, inventory quirks and content conventions; years of customer contact history with its own vocabulary and escalation patterns; a marketplace search experience that needed to reason over the business’s own product taxonomy, not the open web’s.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Models trained and tuned on that proprietary data, operator listings, historical tickets, booking and pricing data delivered results a generic model never could. Domain-tuned content drafting cut operator listing time by 70% and eliminated a 23-day onboarding backlog outright, taking new-operator time-to-live from 23 days to three. A semantic search model trained on the marketplace’s own product catalogue lifted booking conversion by 24%. AI-driven triage trained on the business’s own contact history cut Tier 1 escalations by 34%. None of this came from a smarter foundation model. It came from a smaller, more specific one that knew the business.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why “small” is the strategic choice, not the compromise</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There’s a temptation to treat SLMs as the budget option, what you build when you can’t afford a frontier model. That’s the wrong frame. The evidence is already compelling: <a href="https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/empowering-innovation-the-next-generation-of-the-phi-family/">Microsoft’s Phi-4 family of small models</a>, released in early 2025, demonstrated that a 14-billion-parameter model can match or exceed the performance of models many times its size on complex reasoning and domain-specific tasks while running at a fraction of the compute cost and on-premise, entirely within an organization’s own infrastructure. Smaller, domain-trained models are increasingly outperforming general-purpose giants on narrow, high-value tasks, with far tighter control over data residency, security and explainability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For a CIO or CTO, that combination of lower cost, tighter governance, higher task-specific accuracy is rare enough to demand attention on its own. But the deeper value sits one layer up, at the operating model. An SLM trained on your service history can sit inside claims processing, citizen services, clinical triage, asset maintenance scheduling or M&amp;A due diligence quietly compounding institutional knowledge into a reusable asset rather than letting it walk out the door every time someone retires or resigns.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the real shift: AI capability stops being a subscription and starts being a balance-sheet asset. It can be valued, protected, audited and improved because it belongs to you.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The public sector’s hidden advantage</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nowhere is this more obvious than in government. The public sector sits on some of the richest, least-exploited data and institutional knowledge in the country: Decades of policy outcomes, service delivery history, regulatory precedent, infrastructure records and frontline expertise. Most of it has never been put to systematic use because no commercially available model was ever trusted to touch it, and rightly so.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A small, sovereign, purpose-built model changes that calculus. Trained, hosted and governed entirely within government infrastructure, an SLM doesn’t require sensitive citizen or policy data to leave a secure perimeter. The Australian Government has already recognised this direction: <a href="https://www.finance.gov.au/about-us/news/2025/introducing-aps-ai-plan">The APS AI Plan, released in November 2025</a>, commits to expanding the GovAI platform to provide all public servants with secure, sovereign AI tools operating entirely within Australian Government infrastructure. SLMs tuned to individual agency mandates are the logical next step and a more powerful one than any generic government-wide tool can deliver.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Rather than each agency independently negotiating with the same handful of overseas vendors, a coordinated approach of common standards for model governance, shared security architecture, common evaluation frameworks and pooled infrastructure investment would let agencies build and reuse SLM capability horizontally, the way shared services and common ICT platforms have been built before. Each agency gets a model genuinely tuned to its mandate, but the security model, audit trail and assurance framework are consistent, government-backed and independently verifiable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Done well, this isn’t just an efficiency play. It’s a sovereignty play. As <a href="https://www.govtechreview.com.au/content/gov-datacentre/article/why-sovereign-ai-is-becoming-a-strategic-priority-in-australia-81646916">GovTech Review has noted</a>, large language models hosted offshore create data flows that extend beyond Australia’s borders in ways that are rarely transparent, a risk that is simply untenable for government. Sovereign, purpose-built models keep Australian public data, public knowledge and the resulting capability uplift inside Australian hands, rather than exporting both the data and the long-term value to offshore platforms.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why this belongs in the innovation budget, not the IT budget</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The instinct in many organizations is to treat AI spend as an IT line item, something to be minimised, benchmarked and squeezed for cost efficiency. SLMs deserve a different treatment. They are closer to R&amp;D than infrastructure: An investment in converting accumulated institutional knowledge into a durable, defensible capability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That argument holds in the private sector too. A PE-backed portfolio company, a regulated financial services firm, a healthcare provider — each has years of proprietary operating data sitting idle in case files, transaction logs and service records. An SLM built on that data is a way of turning a sunk cost, decades of operational history, into a forward-looking asset that compounds with every additional case it processes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Boards and executive committees that are still asking “what is our AI strategy?” as a single, undifferentiated question are asking the wrong thing. The better question is: Which parts of our operation are rich enough in proprietary data and judgement to justify owning the model outright, rather than renting someone else’s?</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The opportunity in front of us</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first wave of enterprise AI adoption was about access: Getting a capable model into people’s hands quickly. The next wave will be about ownership: Who controls the model, who controls the data it was built on, and who captures the long-term value of the institutional knowledge it encodes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Australia, with a public sector rich in data and a private sector with deep vertical expertise in financial services, resources, healthcare and logistics, is well placed to lead on this if it treats small, sovereign models as a genuine national capability question, not a procurement footnote. The organizations, and the country, that move early will not just save money. They will own something their competitors can’t easily replicate: An AI that knows them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The next AI bottleneck is not the model. It’s the infrastructure behind it]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Every enterprise AI conversation seems to begin with the same question: Which model should we use?



I understand why. Models are visible. They have names, benchmarks, release notes, pricing pages and impressive demos. They are easy to compare in a leadership meeting. One model promises better r...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3683109/it-nachrichten/the-next-ai-bottleneck-is-not-the-model-its-the-infrastructure-behind-it/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3683109/it-nachrichten/the-next-ai-bottleneck-is-not-the-model-its-the-infrastructure-behind-it/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:03:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every enterprise AI conversation seems to begin with the same question: Which model should we use?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I understand why. Models are visible. They have names, benchmarks, release notes, pricing pages and impressive demos. They are easy to compare in a leadership meeting. One model promises better reasoning. Another offers a larger context window. Another appears faster, cheaper or more specialized.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But after years of working around enterprise platforms, integration layers, cloud migration, middleware, production operations and mission-critical systems, I see the AI conversation differently.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model matters. But it is not where most enterprises will struggle next.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The next AI bottleneck is the infrastructure behind the model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I do not mean only GPUs, cloud capacity or data storage. I mean the full enterprise operating layer that allows AI to work safely in the real world: data pipelines, identity, APIs, messaging, observability, security controls, deployment automation, cost governance, auditability, support ownership and recovery design.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That layer is what determines whether AI remains an exciting experiment or becomes a trusted business capability.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Pilots hide the hard part</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most organizations can build an <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4159287/most-companies-are-stuck-on-ai-chat.html">impressive AI pilot</a>. A small team can connect a model to a dataset, create a workflow and show a use case that works well in a controlled setting.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The harder part starts when that pilot moves into a <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4161509/ai-hype-to-ai-value-escaping-the-activity-trap.html">real production process</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is when practical questions show up. Who owns the data quality? What systems can the AI access? How do we trace which prompt, policy or retrieval flow produced a specific answer? What happens when an API slows down, a queue backs up or a downstream system is unavailable?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To me, these are not model problems. They are infrastructure problems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where many enterprises are now headed. The first phase of AI was experimentation. The next phase is operationalization, and that is where the real gap becomes clear.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/seizing-the-agentic-ai-advantage">McKinsey</a> has made a similar point in its work on agentic AI, noting that the next phase of value depends less on isolated tools and more on redesigning workflows, operating models and enterprise execution around agents.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI pilots can survive on enthusiasm. Production AI requires architecture.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">AI is becoming an integration problem</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The more I look at enterprise AI, the more it feels like an integration challenge.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In large organizations, I have seen how messaging platforms, integration gateways, deployment pipelines, monitoring tools and cloud infrastructure can decide whether a digital capability succeeds or fails. AI will be no different. Even the strongest model will struggle if the data, middleware, identity layer and operational controls around it are weak.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI does not work in isolation. It needs context from systems of record, clean data from different business areas, secure access to APIs, event streams, workflows, knowledge repositories, monitoring tools and legacy systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is why the CIO question is changing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is no longer just, “Which AI tool should we buy?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is becoming, “Can we safely operationalize intelligence across the business?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where agentic AI matters. Autonomous AI only creates real value when the architecture around it can make its actions safe, traceable and useful.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A model can generate an answer. Infrastructure determines whether that answer is secure, timely, explainable, governed and connected to the right workflow.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For example, an AI assistant that summarizes customer or order information may look like a model use case. But underneath, it depends on access control, fresh data, reliable APIs, logging, encryption, monitoring and policy enforcement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If the answer is wrong, people may blame the model. But the real failure may have started with stale data, weak integration, poor access design, missing observability or an unreliable downstream system.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is why CIOs should not judge AI only by model capability. The enterprise system around the model matters just as much.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Latency will become a trust issue</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In traditional technology operations, latency is often treated as a performance metric. In AI-enabled workflows, latency becomes a trust issue.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When an employee asks an AI assistant for help and the response takes too long, the employee stops using it. When a customer-facing workflow becomes slow, the customer abandons it. When an AI agent waits on multiple backend calls, the entire business process feels unreliable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This becomes even more important as organizations move from simple chat interfaces to agentic workflows. A single AI-driven action may include identity checks, context retrieval, policy validation, model reasoning, API calls, business-rule execution, logging and human approval.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each step adds latency. Each dependency adds a possible failure point.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A model may be fast in a benchmark but slow inside an enterprise process. That difference matters.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is where platform engineering becomes essential. Enterprises need reusable patterns for AI workloads: approved connectors, secure retrieval methods, queue-based decoupling, caching strategies, deployment pipelines, monitoring dashboards and standard rollback procedures.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Without those patterns, every AI initiative becomes a custom build. Custom builds may work for pilots, but they do not scale across a large enterprise.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Observability has to expand</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Traditional monitoring tells us whether infrastructure is healthy. Is the server up? Is CPU high? Is memory exhausted? Is the application returning errors?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI needs that, but it also needs more.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We need to know what data was retrieved, which model was used, which prompt version was active, which user initiated the request, which policy was applied, how long each step took and whether the output passed validation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We also need to detect new forms of risk: unusual usage patterns, repeated failed tool calls, unexpected cost spikes, sensitive data exposure, weak retrieval results or an AI workflow attempting actions outside its intended boundary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In production AI, observability is not only about uptime. It is about confidence.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If a business leader, auditor, regulator or security team asks why an AI system made a recommendation, the answer cannot be, “The model said so.” The enterprise needs traceability. It needs evidence. It needs operational context that engineers, risk teams and business owners can understand.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is one of the biggest gaps I see in AI strategy. Many organizations are investing in models and use cases, but not enough in the control plane required to manage them.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Data readiness is still underestimated</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI has exposed an uncomfortable truth: many enterprises are not as data ready as they think.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Data is often duplicated across platforms, described differently by each team, governed inconsistently and refreshed on different schedules. Access rules may be clear in one system but unclear in another. Even basic business definitions can change from department to department.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI does not fix that automatically. In many cases, it makes the problem more visible.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A bad report may be questioned. A bad AI answer may sound confident enough to be trusted.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is a real risk.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Being data-ready for AI is not just about connecting a vector database or indexing documents. It requires clear ownership, lineage, classification, quality checks, retention rules, access boundaries and a shared understanding of which data should be used for which purpose.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The same principle applies to resilient cloud-native design. In my IEEE TechRxiv paper, “<a href="https://www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.175433366.65304469/v1">Enabling Fault-Tolerant Multicast in Cloud-Native Architectures</a>” I explored how reliability, observability and fault tolerance become foundational requirements when critical workloads stretch across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CIOs already understand this because they have lived through enterprise resource planning programs, cloud migration, integration modernization, cybersecurity transformation and analytics initiatives. The lesson is familiar: technology cannot outrun data discipline forever.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Security cannot be added later</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As AI moves from answering questions to acting, security becomes much more important.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An assistant that summarizes information carries one level of risk. An agent that can open a ticket, update a record, trigger a workflow, approve a request or contact a customer carries a very different one.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The more AI can do, the more identity, authorization, least privilege, separation of duties and human approval matter.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises should be careful not to grant AI broad access just to speed up a pilot. That may seem harmless in development, but it can become dangerous at scale.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI access should be treated like any other privileged enterprise capability: limited, logged, reviewed and easy to revoke.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework">NIST</a> AI Risk Management Framework is a useful reference point here because it frames AI risk as something organizations must govern, map, measure and manage continuously rather than something handled only at the end of deployment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Security teams should be involved early, not at the end. The goal is not to slow innovation. The goal is to build a platform where safe innovation becomes repeatable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The CIO has to define the operating model</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI is creating pressure from every direction. Boards want productivity. Business teams want automation. Employees want better tools. Vendors are pushing new features. Security teams are watching risk. Finance teams are watching cost. Customers expect faster, smarter experiences.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The CIO sits in the middle of all of it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is why the CIO’s role cannot stop at choosing tools or approving pilots. The CIO has to define how AI will actually operate across the enterprise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That means answering practical questions. Which architecture is approved? Which data sources can be trusted? How are AI workflows deployed, monitored, supported and governed? How are costs controlled? How do teams reuse common patterns instead of rebuilding the same foundation each time?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This work may not be as exciting as a model demo, but it is what separates sustainable AI from short-term experimentation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The winning organizations will not be the ones with the most pilots. They will be the ones with the strongest AI operating layer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They will build reusable platform patterns, strengthen data governance, design access properly, monitor AI behavior end to end and measure success by business improvement, not only model performance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The model still matters. But the enterprise behind the model matters more.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A powerful model on weak infrastructure will eventually disappoint the business. A capable model on strong infrastructure can deliver real value because it can be trusted, secured, scaled and improved.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the shift CIOs need to lead.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The next AI bottleneck is not the model. It is whether the enterprise behind the model is ready.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[iOS 26.6 Release Candidate Is Here: Everything You Need to Know]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple has released the iOS 26.6 Release Candidate for developers and public beta testers. The update carries build number 23G71 and represents the final testing stage before iOS 26.6 becomes available to all compatible iPhone users.



The release remains a relatively small update, with Apple foc...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682914/ios-mac-os/ios-266-release-candidate-is-here-everything-you-need-to-know/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682914/ios-mac-os/ios-266-release-candidate-is-here-everything-you-need-to-know/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:25:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple has released the iOS 26.6 Release Candidate for developers and public beta testers. The update carries build number 23G71 and represents the final testing stage before iOS 26.6 becomes available to all compatible iPhone users.



The release remains a relatively small update, with Apple focusing mainly on security fixes, system stability, performance improvements, and preparation for the upcoming transition to iOS 27.



Since this is still beta software, users should create a complete iCloud or computer backup before installing it on their main iPhone.



How to Install iOS 26.6 RC



Follow these steps to download the iOS 26.6 Release Candidate:




Open the Settings app on your iPhone.



Select General.



Tap Software Update.



Select Beta Updates.



Choose iOS 26 Public Beta or iOS 26 Developer Beta.



Return to the Software Update screen.



Tap Download and Install.



Enter your iPhone passcode when requested.



Keep the device connected to Wi-Fi and a charger until installation finishes.




Your Apple Account must be registered with the relevant beta program for the update to appear. Users who already have an earlier iOS 26.6 beta installed can download the RC directly through Software Update.



All Changes in iOS 26.6 RC



Apple has not introduced any major visual changes or large new features in this release. The update mainly includes the following improvements:




Bug fixes and stability improvements: iOS 26.6 RC addresses system problems discovered during beta testing and improves general reliability across compatible iPhones.



Security updates: The release includes security patches and additional protections designed to reduce potential risks within the operating system.



Improved Apple Maps security: Apple has added a new security framework for Apple Maps that helps isolate and validate incoming data before it reaches other parts of the system.



Blocked contacts limit warning: The iPhone now displays an alert when a user reaches the maximum limit of 20,000 blocked contacts. Users must remove an existing blocked contact before adding another one.



Spotlight indexing improvements: The update includes changes to Spotlight indexing that help prepare devices for the future upgrade to iOS 27.



Performance improvements: Apple has continued refining system responsiveness, background processes, and overall performance ahead of the public release.




Apple could release the same build to the public if testers do not discover any serious problems. However, the company can issue another Release Candidate if additional fixes are required.



If you have already installed the iOS 26.6 RC update, let us know about its performance, battery life, and any problems you have noticed in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-28220 | Wazuh up to 4.14.4 Cluster Distributed API common.py as_wazuh_object rbac_permissions deserialization (WID-SEC-2026-2377)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in Wazuh up to 4.14.4 and classified as very critical. This vulnerability affects the function as_wazuh_object of the file framework/wazuh/core/cluster/common.py of the component Cluster Distributed API. Such manipulation of the argument rbac_permissions leads to deseria...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682890/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-28220-wazuh-up-to-4144-cluster-distributed-api-commonpy-aswazuhobject-rbacpermissions-deserialization-wid-sec-2026-2377/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682890/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-28220-wazuh-up-to-4144-cluster-distributed-api-commonpy-aswazuhobject-rbacpermissions-deserialization-wid-sec-2026-2377/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:08:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/wazuh">Wazuh up to 4.14.4</a> and classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">very critical</a>. This vulnerability affects the function <code>as_wazuh_object</code> of the file <em>framework/wazuh/core/cluster/common.py</em> of the component <em>Cluster Distributed API</em>. Such manipulation of the argument <em>rbac_permissions</em> leads to deserialization.

This vulnerability is documented as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-28220">CVE-2026-28220</a>. The attack can be executed remotely. There is not any exploit available.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[White hat hacker Park Chan-am zeros in on the AI era’s key security challenges]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Dubbed the “Genius Hacker,” Park Chan-am began his white hat hacker journey at the precocious age of 11, winning awards at domestic and international hacking competitions since his teenage years.



He has since served as a cybersecurity advisor for various Korean government agencies, including t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682886/it-security-nachrichten/white-hat-hacker-park-chan-am-zeros-in-on-the-ai-eras-key-security-challenges/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682886/it-security-nachrichten/white-hat-hacker-park-chan-am-zeros-in-on-the-ai-eras-key-security-challenges/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:07:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dubbed the “Genius Hacker,” <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/chanampark/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Park Chan-am</a> began his white hat hacker journey at the precocious age of 11, winning awards at domestic and international hacking competitions since his teenage years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He has since served as a cybersecurity advisor for various Korean government agencies, including the National Police Agency, and has played a key role in the country’s defense against Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK)-affiliated cyberattacks.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At a seminar held this month as part of the 15th <a href="https://www.kisa.or.kr/401/form?postSeq=3697" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Information Security Day event</a> hosted and organized by government agencies including the Ministry of Science and ICT and the Korea Internet and Security Agency (KISA), Park, now CEO of security firm Steelion, explained the changes in the security environment in the AI ​​era and the priority response tasks for information security organizations under the theme of “Major AI Threats and Security Priorities.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“While AI is a new technology, the core of security ultimately lies in access control, supply chain management, and human verification,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Like many security experts, Park sees AI fundamentally changing the speed of cyberattacks. In the past, infiltrating a corporate network required significant time analyzing a range of software systems to find exploitable vulnerabilities — a task that the use of AI has significantly accelerated.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“In the past, it took at least four weeks to find vulnerabilities, but now it takes less than a day,” he said. “In the era of AI, all software installed within a company becomes a much more critical target for attacks.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a result, securing internal software and the software supply chain are paramount — and require a different perspective on accountability, Park noted.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Clients often ask, ‘Isn’t this just a product made by the vendor?’” he said. “From the moment it is installed in the company system, that software is no longer a vendor issue but part of the corporate system.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We are now in an era where third-party issues can no longer be attributed solely to vendor responsibility,” he stressed.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">MCP under threat</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Park also sees authorization management as a key challenge security teams will face in the agentic era. For example, companies have been increasingly utilizing Model Context Protocol (MCP)-based AI agents to read emails, analyze documents, and connect internal systems with various business tasks. But as the workload handled by AI agents increases, every step an AI agent takes, reading external documents and interacting with internal systems, can become a potential attack vector.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Prompt contamination through malicious documents and the leakage of internal information via agents with excessive privileges are quite realistic scenarios, Park said. In particular, he pointed out that issues that previously ended as minor problems, such as residual privileges left by former employees or outsourced personnel, could escalate into major incidents as AI automatically links these elements together.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When introducing AI, permissions must be designed before functions,” he said. “The entire MCP process must be approached as a single attack path.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The ever-widening blast radius of AI testing</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Local AI testing environments are becoming a dangerous security blind spot that information security leaders often overlook. Rapid experimentation with open-source AI, such as LLaMA-based models, on personal or work PCs often results in servers or ports being left open, and if vulnerabilities are discovered, intrusion pathways immediately open up.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When the [Ollama] remote code execution vulnerability was discovered in 2024, there were <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/2503268/ollama-patches-critical-vulnerability-in-open-source-ai-framework.html" target="_blank">over 1,000</a> servers exposed to the internet, but recently in 2026, it has been confirmed that <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4168584/ollama-vulnerability-highlights-danger-of-ai-frameworks-with-unrestricted-access.html" target="_blank">over 300,000</a> servers from the same targets are exposed,” said Park, adding that “the act of testing AI itself can become a new security risk.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Vulnerability management on notice</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Security operations must also change, Park stressed, noting that the number of alerts that security personnel must handle has increased tenfold, and in some cases up to a hundredfold, making it virtually impossible to respond to all vulnerabilities using the same standards.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a solution, Park sees the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) being insufficient for determining priorities. Instead, he suggested that vulnerability response priorities be determined by utilizing the Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), which predicts the actual likelihood of exploitation, along with the US government’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) list.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For example, if a vulnerability’s CVSS score is 7.5, it is not classified as critical, so it is likely to be pushed down the priority list. But the response priority changes completely if the same vulnerability is listed on the KEV list, has been exploited in actual ransomware attacks, and the probability of an attack based on EPSS has skyrocketed from 1% to 90% within two months. “You must consider these factors together to identify the vulnerabilities that actually need to be patched first,” he stressed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Amidst the vast noise known as the AI s​lop, the criteria for deciding what to patch first is now becoming a core competency for security personnel,” he added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Park also presented new defense techniques applicable to the AI ​​era, such as methods to detect automated attacks by <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/3822459/what-is-anomaly-detection-behavior-based-analysis-for-cyber-threats.html">analyzing behavioral differences</a> between humans and AI attackers, and proof of work (PoW) challenges that intentionally impose computational load on AI attackers to slow down their attacks. A prime example is filtering out abnormal access by analyzing mouse movements, keyboard input, and scrolling patterns.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It is a more realistic strategy to reduce the burden on security teams by filtering out at least some attacks, rather than trying to block them 100%,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Even in the age of AI, technology alone cannot ensure complete security, he noted. “While AI can scan for threats broadly and quickly, verifying and confirming them ultimately falls to humans,” he said. “Humans are still important.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Man of his word: Pope Leo speeches declared human-authored by Australian AI detection tool]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Maps of Hope has been certified by Proudly Human, a company led by former chief scientist, Dr Alan Finkel A collection of speeches and writings by Pope Leo XIV has been certified as human-authored less than two months after Leo declared artificial intelligence the greatest threat to humanity.Prou...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682838/ai-nachrichten/man-of-his-word-pope-leo-speeches-declared-human-authored-by-australian-ai-detection-tool/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682838/ai-nachrichten/man-of-his-word-pope-leo-speeches-declared-human-authored-by-australian-ai-detection-tool/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 08:33:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maps of Hope has been certified by Proudly Human, a company led by former chief scientist, Dr Alan Finkel </p><p>A collection of speeches and writings by Pope Leo XIV has been certified as human-authored less than two months after Leo declared artificial intelligence the greatest threat to humanity.</p><p>Proudly Human, the Australian company spearheaded by Australia’s former chief scientist, Dr Alan Finkel, undertook a review of a collection of writings and speeches by the Pope, in collaboration with the publisher, the Australian Catholic University and cardinals in the Vatican.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jul/21/pope-leo-speech-human-not-ai-artificial-intelligence">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[XSSer v.1.9 - "Bl4ck Swarm!" released]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Posted by psy on Jul 20Hi FD,

I am glad to present a new release of this tool:

   - https://xsser.03c8.net

---------

"Cross Site "Scripter" (aka XSSer) is an automatic -framework- to
detect, exploit and report XSS vulnerabilities in web-based
applications. It provides several options to try t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682791/it-security-nachrichten/xsser-v19-bl4ck-swarm-released/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682791/it-security-nachrichten/xsser-v19-bl4ck-swarm-released/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 08:08:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted by psy on Jul 20</p>Hi FD,<br>
<br>
I am glad to present a new release of this tool:<br>
<br>
   - <a rel="nofollow" href="https://xsser.03c8.net/">https://xsser.03c8.net</a><br>
<br>
---------<br>
<br>
"Cross Site "Scripter" (aka XSSer) is an automatic -framework- to<br>
detect, exploit and report XSS vulnerabilities in web-based<br>
applications. It provides several options to try to bypass certain<br>
filters and various special techniques for code injection."<br>
<br>
---------<br>
<br>
XSSer has pre-installed [ &gt; 1500 XSS ] attacking vectors and can...<br>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[PR3TACK preemptive framework maps threats before attackers use them]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Defensive frameworks in cybersecurity record what attackers have already done. Analysts study a breach, document the method, and build detections around confirmed activity. This cycle leaves a gap between the moment an attacker invents a technique and the moment defenders…
Read more →
The post PR...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682751/it-security-nachrichten/pr3tack-preemptive-framework-maps-threats-before-attackers-use-them/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682751/it-security-nachrichten/pr3tack-preemptive-framework-maps-threats-before-attackers-use-them/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 07:37:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defensive frameworks in cybersecurity record what attackers have already done. Analysts study a breach, document the method, and build detections around confirmed activity. This cycle leaves a gap between the moment an attacker invents a technique and the moment defenders…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/pr3tack-preemptive-framework-maps-threats-before-attackers-use-them/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/pr3tack-preemptive-framework-maps-threats-before-attackers-use-them/">PR3TACK preemptive framework maps threats before attackers use them</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HOLLOWGRAPH Malware Turns Microsoft 365 Calendar Events Into Covert Command-and-Control Channels]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[HOLLOWGRAPH, a Windows malware implant that transforms Microsoft 365 calendar events into a covert command-and-control channel. This malware, which is highly likely linked to the Cavern modular backdoor framework, utilizes the Microsoft Graph API to retrieve tasks from operators and…
Read more →
...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682749/it-security-nachrichten/hollowgraph-malware-turns-microsoft-365-calendar-events-into-covert-command-and-control-channels/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682749/it-security-nachrichten/hollowgraph-malware-turns-microsoft-365-calendar-events-into-covert-command-and-control-channels/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 07:37:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HOLLOWGRAPH, a Windows malware implant that transforms Microsoft 365 calendar events into a covert command-and-control channel. This malware, which is highly likely linked to the Cavern modular backdoor framework, utilizes the Microsoft Graph API to retrieve tasks from operators and…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/hollowgraph-malware-turns-microsoft-365-calendar-events-into-covert-command-and-control-channels/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/hollowgraph-malware-turns-microsoft-365-calendar-events-into-covert-command-and-control-channels/">HOLLOWGRAPH Malware Turns Microsoft 365 Calendar Events Into Covert Command-and-Control Channels</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[PR3TACK preemptive framework maps threats before attackers use them]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Defensive frameworks in cybersecurity record what attackers have already done. Analysts study a breach, document the method, and build detections around confirmed activity. This cycle leaves a gap between the moment an attacker invents a technique and the moment defenders learn to catch it. PR3TA...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682725/it-security-nachrichten/pr3tack-preemptive-framework-maps-threats-before-attackers-use-them/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682725/it-security-nachrichten/pr3tack-preemptive-framework-maps-threats-before-attackers-use-them/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 07:24:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defensive frameworks in cybersecurity record what attackers have already done. Analysts study a breach, document the method, and build detections around confirmed activity. This cycle leaves a gap between the moment an attacker invents a technique and the moment defenders learn to catch it. PR3TACK, the Preemptive Tactics and Countermeasures Knowledgebase, aims to close that gap. Vishal Thakur of Atlassian built the open framework that catalogs plausible attacker tactics, techniques, and procedures that remain unobserved … <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/07/21/first-pr3tack-preemptive-framework/" rel="nofollow">More <span class="meta-nav">→</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/07/21/first-pr3tack-preemptive-framework/">PR3TACK preemptive framework maps threats before attackers use them</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/">Help Net Security</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hackers Use Microsoft 365 Calendar Events as Dead Drops for Malware Commands]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A newly identified Windows malware sample, dubbed HOLLOWGRAPH, is abusing the Microsoft Graph API to turn a compromised Microsoft 365 calendar into a covert two-way command-and-control channel. Group-IB attributes the malware, with high confidence, to the Iranian-linked Cavern backdoor framework,...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682721/it-security-nachrichten/hackers-use-microsoft-365-calendar-events-as-dead-drops-for-malware-commands/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682721/it-security-nachrichten/hackers-use-microsoft-365-calendar-events-as-dead-drops-for-malware-commands/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 07:24:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A newly identified Windows malware sample, dubbed HOLLOWGRAPH, is abusing the Microsoft Graph API to turn a compromised Microsoft 365 calendar into a covert two-way command-and-control channel. Group-IB attributes the malware, with high confidence, to the Iranian-linked Cavern backdoor framework, and says it communicates through a compromised Microsoft 365 account in Israel, blending its traffic […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cyberpress.org/hackers-use-microsoft-365-calendar-events/">Hackers Use Microsoft 365 Calendar Events as Dead Drops for Malware Commands</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cyberpress.org/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HOLLOWGRAPH Malware Turns Microsoft 365 Calendar Events Into Covert Command-and-Control Channels]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[HOLLOWGRAPH, a Windows malware implant that transforms Microsoft 365 calendar events into a covert command-and-control channel. This malware, which is highly likely linked to the Cavern modular backdoor framework, utilizes the Microsoft Graph API to retrieve tasks from operators and to exfiltrate...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682717/it-security-nachrichten/hollowgraph-malware-turns-microsoft-365-calendar-events-into-covert-command-and-control-channels/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682717/it-security-nachrichten/hollowgraph-malware-turns-microsoft-365-calendar-events-into-covert-command-and-control-channels/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 07:24:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HOLLOWGRAPH, a Windows malware implant that transforms Microsoft 365 calendar events into a covert command-and-control channel. This malware, which is highly likely linked to the Cavern modular backdoor framework, utilizes the Microsoft Graph API to retrieve tasks from operators and to exfiltrate stolen data via a compromised Microsoft 365 mailbox. This technique enables malicious communications […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://gbhackers.com/hollowgraph-malware-turns-microsoft-365-calendar-events/">HOLLOWGRAPH Malware Turns Microsoft 365 Calendar Events Into Covert Command-and-Control Channels</a> appeared first on <a href="https://gbhackers.com/">GBHackers Security | #1 Globally Trusted Cyber Security News Platform</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Furtex – A Post-Exploitation and Evasion Toolkit on Linux for Security Researchers & Red Teamers]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A new open-source project, Furtex, has emerged as a Linux-focused post-exploitation and evasion research toolkit for authorized security researchers and red-team operators. The project combines raw io_uring system calls, BPF and eBPF tooling, and EDR-evasion research utilities without relying on ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682576/it-security-nachrichten/furtex-a-post-exploitation-and-evasion-toolkit-on-linux-for-security-researchers-red-teamers/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682576/it-security-nachrichten/furtex-a-post-exploitation-and-evasion-toolkit-on-linux-for-security-researchers-red-teamers/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 04:38:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new open-source project, Furtex, has emerged as a Linux-focused post-exploitation and evasion research toolkit for authorized security researchers and red-team operators. The project combines raw io_uring system calls, BPF and eBPF tooling, and EDR-evasion research utilities without relying on liburing or larger frameworks. Furtex is a collection of single-purpose tools designed to demonstrate how […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/furtex-linux-toolkit/">Furtex – A Post-Exploitation and Evasion Toolkit on Linux for Security Researchers &amp; Red Teamers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2019-13990 | Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition 12.2.1.4.0 Framework xml external entity reference (Nessus ID 210560 / WID-SEC-2026-1608)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability labeled as very critical has been found in Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition 12.2.1.4.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component Framework. The manipulation results in xml external entity reference.

This vulnerability is identified as CVE-2019-1...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682562/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2019-13990-oracle-business-intelligence-enterprise-edition-122140-framework-xml-external-entity-reference-nessus-id-210560-wid-sec-2026-1608/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682562/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2019-13990-oracle-business-intelligence-enterprise-edition-122140-framework-xml-external-entity-reference-nessus-id-210560-wid-sec-2026-1608/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 04:25:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability labeled as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">very critical</a> has been found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/oracle:business_intelligence_enterprise_edition">Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition 12.2.1.4.0</a>. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component <em>Framework</em>. The manipulation results in xml external entity reference.

This vulnerability is identified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2019-13990">CVE-2019-13990</a>. The attack can be executed remotely. There is not any exploit available.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Looking for guidance on moving my low-latency C++ project from AF_PACKET to real DPDK kernel bypass]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hi everyone, I've been building a low-latency C++20 trading engine as a learning project over the past few months, and I'm now planning the next major version. I'd appreciate some guidance from people with DPDK or low-latency networking experience. GitHub: https://github.com/Shivfun99/Pulse-Order...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682517/linux-tipps/looking-for-guidance-on-moving-my-low-latency-c-project-from-afpacket-to-real-dpdk-kernel-bypass/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682517/linux-tipps/looking-for-guidance-on-moving-my-low-latency-c-project-from-afpacket-to-real-dpdk-kernel-bypass/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 03:56:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi everyone,</p> <p>I've been building a low-latency C++20 trading engine as a learning project over the past few months, and I'm now planning the next major version. I'd appreciate some guidance from people with DPDK or low-latency networking experience.</p> <p><strong>GitHub:</strong><br> <a href="https://github.com/Shivfun99/Pulse-Order">https://github.com/Shivfun99/Pulse-Order</a></p> <p>past posts:</p> <p><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/quantindia/s/u45s60B33Q">https://www.reddit.com/r/quantindia/s/u45s60B33Q</a></p> <p><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/quant/s/IHKVkv0UGv">https://www.reddit.com/r/quant/s/IHKVkv0UGv</a></p> <h1>Current Version (V1)</h1> <p>The project currently includes:</p> <ul> <li>Binary market data parsing</li> <li>Level 2 order book</li> <li>Strategy + risk checks</li> <li>DPDK-based packet processing experiments</li> <li>AF_PACKET backend for packet RX/TX</li> <li>Cache-friendly C++20 implementation</li> <li>Lock-free queues</li> <li>Application-side latency benchmarking</li> <li>Scenario testing and benchmarking framework</li> </ul> <p>Current latency (application-side RX → TX enqueue) is in the sub-microsecond range under the benchmark setup, but I understand this is <strong>not true wire-to-wire latency</strong> since it doesn't involve a physical DPDK-supported NIC.</p> <h1>What I want to build in V2</h1> <p>I want to move to a <strong>real DPDK kernel-bypass architecture</strong> using a physical NIC instead of AF_PACKET.</p> <p>My goals are:</p> <ul> <li>Real kernel bypass using DPDK</li> <li>VFIO-bound NIC</li> <li>Poll Mode Driver (PMD)</li> <li>Physical RX/TX queues</li> <li>End-to-end latency measurement</li> <li>Hardware timestamping (later)</li> <li>Multi-queue support</li> <li>Real market-data replay</li> <li>Accurate p99/p99.9 latency analysis</li> </ul> <h1>My situation</h1> <p>At the moment I only have an <strong>ASUS TUF Gaming A15</strong> laptop running Ubuntu. I don't have a desktop or server.</p> <p>From what I've read, it seems server NICs like the Intel X520/X710/I350 require PCIe, which laptops generally don't provide.</p> <h1>My questions</h1> <ol> <li>Is there any practical way to use a real DPDK-supported NIC with only this laptop?</li> <li>Would you recommend moving to a desktop before attempting real kernel bypass?</li> <li>What hardware would you buy if you were starting today on a limited budget?</li> <li>Are there any good open-source examples that demonstrate a complete RX → processing → TX pipeline with DPDK?</li> <li>If you were designing the next version of this project, what features would you prioritize?</li> </ol> <p>I'm building this primarily to learn low-latency systems and HFT infrastructure, so I'd really appreciate any advice, recommended hardware, papers, repositories, or common mistakes to avoid.</p> <p>Thanks!</p> <p><a href="https://www.reddit.com/submit/?source_id=t3_1v1qm0s&amp;composer_entry=crosspost_prompt"></a></p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Federal_Tackle3053"> /u/Federal_Tackle3053 </a> <br> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1v1qov1/looking_for_guidance_on_moving_my_lowlatency_c/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1v1qov1/looking_for_guidance_on_moving_my_lowlatency_c/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2019-13990 | Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform 13.2.1.0 Connector Framework xml external entity reference (Nessus ID 210560 / WID-SEC-2026-1608)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform 13.2.1.0. It has been classified as very critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Connector Framework. The manipulation leads to xml external entity reference.

This vulnerability is referenced as CVE-2...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682395/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2019-13990-oracle-enterprise-manager-base-platform-13210-connector-framework-xml-external-entity-reference-nessus-id-210560-wid-sec-2026-1608/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682395/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2019-13990-oracle-enterprise-manager-base-platform-13210-connector-framework-xml-external-entity-reference-nessus-id-210560-wid-sec-2026-1608/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 01:38:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/oracle:enterprise_manager_base_platform">Oracle Enterprise Manager Base Platform 13.2.1.0</a>. It has been classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">very critical</a>. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component <em>Connector Framework</em>. The manipulation leads to xml external entity reference.

This vulnerability is referenced as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2019-13990">CVE-2019-13990</a>. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. No exploit is available.

Upgrading the affected component is recommended.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Length Value Model: Scalable Value Pretraining for Token-Level Length Modeling]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Token serves as the fundamental unit of computation in modern autoregressive models, and generation length directly influences both inference cost and reasoning performance. Despite its importance, existing approaches lack fine-grained length modeling, operating primarily at the coarse-grained se...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682344/ai-nachrichten/length-value-model-scalable-value-pretraining-for-token-level-length-modeling/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682344/ai-nachrichten/length-value-model-scalable-value-pretraining-for-token-level-length-modeling/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 01:02:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Token serves as the fundamental unit of computation in modern autoregressive models, and generation length directly influences both inference cost and reasoning performance. Despite its importance, existing approaches lack fine-grained length modeling, operating primarily at the coarse-grained sequence level. In this paper, we introduce the Length Value Model (LenVM), a token-level framework that models the remaining generation length at each decoding step. By formulating length modeling as a value estimation problem and assigning a constant negative reward to each generated token, LenVM…]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Writer's AI harness cuts token spend nearly 40% — without sacrificing accuracy]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Enterprise AI is facing an ROI paradox. While throwing more compute at the strongest foundation model works well in product experiments, the costs become unbearable when the product is deployed in production.A new paper from researchers at Writer provides a solution that is accessible to engineer...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682237/it-nachrichten/writers-ai-harness-cuts-token-spend-nearly-40-without-sacrificing-accuracy/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682237/it-nachrichten/writers-ai-harness-cuts-token-spend-nearly-40-without-sacrificing-accuracy/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 23:48:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enterprise AI is facing an ROI paradox. While throwing more compute at the strongest foundation model works well in product experiments, the costs become unbearable when the product is deployed in production.</p><p>A <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06906">new paper</a> from researchers at Writer provides a solution that is accessible to engineering teams. The study takes a systematic look at optimizing the different components of the orchestration layer that wraps around the foundation model, aka the AI harness. </p><p>By optimizing the harness, the researchers show dramatic reductions in tokens per task, a drop in cost-per-successful-task by up to 61%, and quality that holds steady, all without changing the underlying foundation model.</p><p>Because the harness is fully under the developer's control and requires no model fine-tuning, engineering teams can apply these findings to build highly cost-efficient AI applications.</p><h2>The ROI crisis of tokenmaxxing</h2><p>The current state of AI engineering is plagued by "<a href="https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/the-pulse-tokenmaxxing-as-a-weird-new-trend/">tokenmaxxing</a>," an industry trend where developers rely on massive context windows and brute-force token consumption as a substitute for good system design. </p><p>Rather than engineering elegant workflows, developers have imported a reflex from traditional software development: generate, run, fail, stuff the error and more context back into the window, and retry. </p><p>"Teams tokenmaxx because it's the cheapest fix in the moment, and because it's literally how most engineers work today," Waseem AlShikh, CTO and co-founder of Writer, told VentureBeat. Because this approach succeeds often enough on coding tasks, it has become the default reflex for every other agentic workload. The danger is that per-token price drops mask the underlying inefficiency. </p><p>"Your invoice is tokens-per-task times price-per-token, and most teams only watch the second number," AlShikh said. "In agentic workloads, tokens-per-task compounds — every loop iteration re-transmits the growing context — and it compounds faster than prices fall. The price cut becomes an anesthetic. It masks the fact that the loop itself is bleeding."</p><p>Tokenmaxxing leads to several enterprise failure modes. Teams route simple tasks to premium frontier models by default. They use the LLM as a lazy search index, stuffing the context window with raw documents instead of retrieving exact answers. Most destructively, they build unconstrained agentic loops that spiral out of control when the model encounters an error. Because output tokens cost significantly more than input tokens across all major model providers, inefficient task execution acts as a silent budget killer.</p><p>The industry has introduced several efficiency techniques to curb these costs, but they largely fall short because they treat the model in isolation: </p><ul><li><p><b></b><a href="https://venturebeat.com/data/context-compression-finally-works-in-production-new-research-cuts-llm-input-16x-without-the-accuracy-hit"><b>Prompt compression</b></a> condenses input text to save space, but ignores how the system sequences those inputs across complex workflows. </p></li><li><p><b>Budgeted reasoning</b> caps the computational steps a model can take, which often degrades output quality if the workflow isn't intelligently routed. </p></li><li><p><b>Terse coding</b> forces models to output minimal code to save output tokens, but does nothing to solve inefficient tool calling. </p></li><li><p><a href="https://venturebeat.com/data/together-ais-atlas-adaptive-speculator-delivers-400-inference-speedup-by"><b>Speculative decoding</b></a> uses a smaller draft model to speed up a larger model's text generation, optimizing inference speed while failing to address bloated agent architectures.</p></li></ul><p>These efforts fail because they optimize the engine while ignoring the transmission. They do not look at the orchestration layer, leaving underlying architectural inefficiencies unresolved.</p><h2>Unpacking the harness: the levers of efficiency</h2><p>The harness is the orchestration layer that routes, formats, and turns the underlying LLM into a working system.</p><p>The core levers of harness optimization include system prompt caching, interaction history compaction, tool management, retrieval strategies, and error management. These are the most accessible intervention points for engineering teams looking to improve AI performance. </p><p>As the Writer researchers note in the study: “If the harness is the layer that composes model calls into work, it is also the layer that sets the price of work.”</p><p>Historically, developers have treated the harness as disposable glue code designed simply to connect an API to a user interface. The study signals that the harness must now be treated as a first-class object: a primary software artifact that requires its own testing, versioning, and rigorous design. </p><p>For enterprises, this reframes the "own-versus-rent" decision. </p><p>"Enterprises spend months on model evaluations and then rent their orchestration off the shelf — which means they're optimizing the smaller lever and outsourcing the bigger one," AlShikh said. "Whoever owns the harness owns your unit economics, and an open framework tuned for demos is not tuned for your invoice." </p><h2>Inside the experiments</h2><p>To isolate the impact of the orchestration layer, the researchers ran experiments on six foundation models spanning multiple vendors and weight classes: Claude Sonnet 4.6, Gemini 3.1, Gemini Flash 3.5, Qwen 3.6, GLM 5.1, and Writer’s own model, Palmyra X6. </p><p>Their experiments compared a frozen, conventional production agent loop against the finished Writer Agent Harness on the same 22 locked enterprise tasks, spanning capabilities like grounding and retrieval, multi-step workflows, tool use, and content generation. By holding the models and tasks constant, they could isolate the effects of the orchestration layer itself.</p><p>The optimized harness drove a significant drop in costs, cutting the blended cost per task by 41%, from 21 cents to 12 cents. This was largely achieved by slashing token consumption, with the number of tokens per task falling 38%, from 14.2k to 8.8k.</p><p>The harness is designed to delegate tasks like search to specialized sub-agents. A sub-agent receives only the tool and the specific query it needs, retrieves the exact data, and returns a capped, clean summary to the main agent — keeping the primary context window from filling up with raw search results.</p><p>Task success rates held steady even as token use fell — moving from 78% to 81%, a gain the researchers describe as directional rather than statistically significant at their sample size, meaning quality didn't suffer even as costs dropped.</p><p>End-to-end task latency also dropped significantly, reducing the median wall-clock time by 44%, from 48 seconds to 27 seconds, due to prompt caching and the elimination of dead-end reasoning loops.</p><p>However, the researchers also found limits to multi-agent orchestration. Smaller models like Gemini Flash 3.5 and Qwen 3.6 scored well below a usable reliability threshold on sub-agent delegation tasks (0.45 and 0.42, respectively) — the capability simply isn't dependable yet on lighter-weight models.</p><p>Sub-agent orchestration only crossed a usable reliability threshold on the two strongest models tested: Writer's own Palmyra X6 (0.86) and Claude Sonnet 4.6 (0.85).</p><h2>The developer’s playbook: actionable takeaways and tradeoffs</h2><p>The findings from the study translate into a playbook for enterprise developers building agentic workflows at scale. The first step is to implement what AlShikh calls the "Two-Zone Prompt" and "Context Offloading."</p><p><b>Structure for system prompt caching (The Two-Zone Prompt):</b> Modern LLM APIs offer prompt caching, but developers must structure their payloads correctly to trigger it. Developers must separate the "stable zone" from the "volatile zone." Place static, unchanging elements (e.g., core rules, large tool schemas, and standard operating procedures) at the top of the prompt. Dynamic elements, such as the specific user query or recent conversational task state, must be appended at the bottom. This ordering allows the harness to reuse the cached prefix across hundreds of calls. "That single separation makes prompt caching actually work and stops you from re-paying for the same instructions on every one of an agent's thirty steps," AlShikh said.</p><p><b>Manage context with Context Offloading:</b> Avoid context stuffing, where every turn of a loop is appended into a monolithic prompt until the window maxes out. Instead, move history and intermediate artifacts out of the window into retrievable storage, and pull back only what the current step needs. If possible, delegate tasks to single-purpose sub-agents to avoid context bloat. As AlShikh points out, "the biggest line item in agent spend isn't reasoning — it's re-sending things the model has already seen."</p><p><b>Build resilient loops and redefine KPIs:</b> Unmanaged agent loops drain API budgets rapidly. Teams must begin tracking Completions Per Million tokens (CPM) to understand their true task costs, but the harness itself must contain physical guardrails. "The core principle is that you never ask the model to police its own spending," AlShikh said. "The fence has to live below the model, in code, on your side of the API." This requires three hard checks:</p><ul><li><p><b>Hard per-task token budgets:</b> The run terminates when the budget is spent, no exceptions.</p></li><li><p><b>Generation fencing:</b> Caps on steps, tool calls, and recursion depth to stop non-converging agents. </p></li><li><p><b>Failure-spend governance:</b> Cap what a run can spend after its first failed validation so a failing task doesn't become your most expensive task.</p></li></ul><p><b>Avoid unnecessary complexity:</b> Optimizing the orchestration layer comes with engineering overhead. If you're in the prototyping and exploration stage, that overhead isn't justified — iterate fast with a strong model and a light harness. Once you're scaling to millions of requests a day, the savings from harness optimization become substantial.</p><p>However, teams must be aware of "harness leverage." Adding structural scaffolding requires the model to hold and obey that context. If a model is too small, it will spend its limited capacity parsing the scaffolding instead of doing the task, causing accuracy to drop and tokens to rise. The rule for adding complex orchestration features is strictly mathematical: "If a feature adds more coordination tokens than it removes task tokens for that specific model, cut it," AlShikh said. "Nothing in the harness is free."</p><h2>The future of the enterprise harness</h2><p>The era of tokenmaxxing and treating context windows like bottomless buckets is coming to an end. Throwing more compute at poorly designed systems is not a viable strategy for companies that need to demonstrate a return on their AI investments. </p><p>As foundation models evolve to absorb planning, tool selection, and multi-step reasoning natively into their weights, the role of the harness will shift from compensating for model weakness to enforcing enterprise policy.</p><p>"What never moves into the model is the 'allowed': budgets, permissions, data boundaries, audit trails, deterministic kill-switches," AlShikh said. "Five years from now, the harness will be thinner but more important. There will be less scaffolding and more governance. However capable the model gets, someone external to it still has to define what it may spend, see, and touch. That layer belongs to the enterprise, and it should never be rented."</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI Platform Lets California Match Model With Use Case]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Less than a year after pilot, the California Department of Technology has launched Poppy, a collection of 10 different models. State staffers who use it can choose the model that best fits their task.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682213/ai-nachrichten/ai-platform-lets-california-match-model-with-use-case/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682213/ai-nachrichten/ai-platform-lets-california-match-model-with-use-case/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 23:36:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Less than a year after pilot, the California Department of Technology has launched Poppy, a collection of 10 different models. State staffers who use it can choose the model that best fits their task.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[IKEA just dropped its Halloween collection in the middle of summer — and these ghostly lights are so cute, I can't wait until October]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It might still be the middle of summer, but it's never too early to start getting ready for spooky season — especially when the decorations are this cute.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682203/it-nachrichten/ikea-just-dropped-its-halloween-collection-in-the-middle-of-summer-and-these-ghostly-lights-are-so-cute-i-cant-wait-until-october/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682203/it-nachrichten/ikea-just-dropped-its-halloween-collection-in-the-middle-of-summer-and-these-ghostly-lights-are-so-cute-i-cant-wait-until-october/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 23:35:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It might still be the middle of summer, but it's never too early to start getting ready for spooky season — especially when the decorations are this cute.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple adds another office to its Sunnyvale collection]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple is expanding its presence in Sunnyvale once again by leasing a 125,800-square-foot building. If history repeats itself, Apple will buy it within a year.The property at 580 North Mary Avenue, Sunnyvale - Image Credit: Google MapsCompanies with a massive workforce are always on the lookout fo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682089/ios-mac-os/apple-adds-another-office-to-its-sunnyvale-collection/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682089/ios-mac-os/apple-adds-another-office-to-its-sunnyvale-collection/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 22:23:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple is expanding its presence in Sunnyvale once again by leasing a 125,800-square-foot building. If history repeats itself, Apple will buy it within a year.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68306-143975-applesunnyvaleofficegooglemaps-xl.jpg" alt="Modern glass office building with reflective blue-tinted windows, angled facade, and several stories, surrounded by green leafy trees under a clear blue sky" height="738"><br><span>The property at 580 North Mary Avenue, Sunnyvale - Image Credit: Google Maps</span></div><br>Companies with a massive workforce are always on the lookout for more office space. In the case of Apple, it will be adding one more location to its roster in Sunnyvale.<br><br>According to <a href="https://www.mercurynews.com/2026/07/20/apple-amazon-tech-jobs-office-property-ai-real-estate-develop-economy/">sources</a> of the <em>Mercury News</em>, Apple has agreed to lease a building located at 580 North Mary Avenue in Sunnyvale. The property, which weighs in at 125,800 square foot of office space, is being leased from the Bay Area real estate firm Peery Arrillaga.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/20/apple-adds-another-office-to-its-sunnyvale-collection?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245006?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AliExpress Hit With Record $625 Million Fine After Failing To Make EU-Ordered Fixes]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The European Commission has fined AliExpress more than $625 million, the largest penalty yet under the Digital Services Act, after finding that the marketplace failed to "diligently assess and mitigate risks relating to the sale of illegal, unsafe, or counterfeit products on its e-commerce platfo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3682008/it-security-nachrichten/aliexpress-hit-with-record-625-million-fine-after-failing-to-make-eu-ordered-fixes/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3682008/it-security-nachrichten/aliexpress-hit-with-record-625-million-fine-after-failing-to-make-eu-ordered-fixes/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 21:09:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The European Commission has fined AliExpress more than $625 million, the largest penalty yet under the Digital Services Act, after finding that the marketplace failed to "diligently assess and mitigate risks relating to the sale of illegal, unsafe, or counterfeit products on its e-commerce platform." EU officials said flagged products repeatedly reappeared, sellers could evade safeguards, and AliExpress's recommendation and ad systems helped amplify dangerous goods. Ars Technica reports: For shady sellers, the risks of detection appeared low. The e-commerce site's mandatory brand authorization system was also ineffective and understaffed, the EC found, and AliExpress did not penalize traders for selling illegal products as its policy claims it would. Making things worse, AliExpress "inadequately assessed how its recommender and advertising systems exacerbate the spread of illegal products," the EC said. So rather than remove illegal products, AliExpress was recommending them to consumers and helping to maximize exposure. Talking to the press, the European Union's tech chief, Henna Virkkunen, noted that one in five Europeans shop monthly at retail sites like AliExpress, Temu, and Shein.
 
AliExpress also relied on a single quantitative metric to gauge how effectively its systems were working to weed out illegal products. And that metric did not properly measure the extent of the harm. EC testing found that "a high volume of illegal products" -- including unsafe toys and dangerous cosmetics -- "continued to circulate despite AliExpress' moderation efforts." In June 2025, AliExpress was ordered to bring its platform into compliance with the DSA but failed to make the necessary changes, the EC said. The fine was calculated to be proportionate to the nature of the violations, which the EC considered "particularly serious infringements," and to penalize AliExpress's delayed interventions to mitigate flagged risks.
 
[...] AliExpress told Ars it was "surprised" by the "disproportionate" fine. AliExpress said it plans to appeal the decision, claiming the EC ignored its "sound risk management framework and the significant, proactive enhancements we have made." The massive online retailer noted that its EU market is substantially smaller than its China market and said that it invests "substantial resources in risk assessment and mitigation, product safety and consumer protection" and "has been and continues to be committed to meeting our obligations to consumers."<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=AliExpress+Hit+With+Record+%24625+Million+Fine+After+Failing+To+Make+EU-Ordered+Fixes%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F20%2F1751219%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F20%2F1751219%2Faliexpress-hit-with-record-625-million-fine-after-failing-to-make-eu-ordered-fixes%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/07/20/1751219/aliexpress-hit-with-record-625-million-fine-after-failing-to-make-eu-ordered-fixes?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Where the real competition is in AI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Last year Anthropic gave away one of the most successful things it has ever built. And, no, I’m not talking about Claude. I’m referring to MCP, the now ubiquitous Model Context Protocol, which Anthropic donated to the Linux Foundation’s new Agentic AI Foundation⁠. At the time, MCP was pulling nea...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681885/ai-nachrichten/where-the-real-competition-is-in-ai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681885/ai-nachrichten/where-the-real-competition-is-in-ai/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 19:48:37 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Last year Anthropic gave away one of the most successful things it has ever built. And, no, I’m not talking about Claude. I’m referring to MCP, the now ubiquitous <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">Model Context Protocol</a>, which Anthropic <a href="https://anthropic.com/news/donating-the-model-context-protocol-and-establishing-of-the-agentic-ai-foundation">donated to the Linux Foundation’s new Agentic AI Foundation</a>⁠. At the time, MCP was <a href="https://blog.modelcontextprotocol.io/posts/2025-12-09-mcp-joins-agentic-ai-foundation/">pulling nearly 100 million monthly SDK downloads</a> across more than 10,000 active servers⁠, prompting the question as to why any company would give up such a popular piece of technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google did much the same months earlier, <a href="https://developers.googleblog.com/en/google-cloud-donates-a2a-to-linux-foundation/">handing its Agent2Agent (A2A) protocol</a> to the Linux Foundation⁠ with AWS, Cisco, Microsoft, Salesforce, SAP, and ServiceNow signing on as founding members. OpenAI, not to be outdone, <a href="https://openai.com/index/new-tools-and-features-in-the-responses-api/">supports remote MCP servers in its Responses API</a>⁠, sits on the MCP steering committee, and contributed AGENTS.md to that same foundation alongside its fiercest rival’s protocol.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s like <em>Game of Thrones</em>, except the principal AI powers seek regime change through seeming acts of beneficence rather than violence. For those who have been around for a while, it’s also entirely predictable, following a similar script we’ve seen in the cloud, on-premises servers, and more. Platform companies don’t give away technologies they’ve stopped caring about. They give away technologies they no longer need to own because competitive advantage has shifted to new ground.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What does this mean for AI?</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><a></a>Gravity has shifted before</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google has long been an exceptionally active contributor to <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2262355/what-is-open-source-software-open-source-and-foss-explained.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2262355/what-is-open-source-software-open-source-and-foss-explained.html">open source</a>. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2260293/open-source-innovation-is-now-all-about-vendor-on-ramps-2.html">As I wrote in 2017</a>, Google wasn’t open sourcing TensorFlow and Kubernetes out of generosity but rather turning these open source assets into on-ramps for Google Cloud. Google was playing catch-up to AWS and Microsoft. As <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2248699/why-kubernetes-is-winning-the-container-war.html">then Google product manager Martin Buhr said</a>, the company hoped to “create a gravity well in the market for container-based apps [so] that a significant percentage of them will end up with us.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In other words, platform companies routinely commoditize one layer of the stack so they can compete somewhere where they hold a stronger hand.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266566/what-is-github-more-than-git-version-control-in-the-cloud.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266566/what-is-github-more-than-git-version-control-in-the-cloud.html">GitHub</a> may be an even better example. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2334697/what-is-git-version-control-for-collaborative-programming.html">Git </a>is open. Anyone can host a Git repository and, once upon a time, different companies did just that. Yet <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2266566/what-is-github-more-than-git-version-control-in-the-cloud.html">GitHub </a>became the default place software development happens for millions of developers. Nobody pays for Git, but lots of people pay for GitHub. We’re seeing this same phenomenon play out in AI.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Trading contributions for control</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anthropic and OpenAI have both pretended at being all for humanity’s good, but that’s not a good explanation for why they’re racing to give away things like <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4029634/what-is-model-context-protocol-how-mcp-bridges-ai-and-external-services.html">MCP</a>. The deeper reason is that the model itself has turned out to be a poor place to build a lasting moat, and they’re trying to figure out what’s next. <a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/4195842/which-ai-model-should-you-bet-your-company-on-none-of-them.html">As I pointed out recently</a>, the frontier model leaderboards change almost weekly. As such, enterprises shouldn’t build their AI strategy around the assumption that any one vendor will remain permanently ahead on model quality. Instead, as I suggested, AI may be sexy, but the “dull reality” is connecting those models to enterprise data, workflows, etc.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The AI companies understand this better than anyone. Sure, they’ll continue spending billions training ever more capable models because frontier models attract developers, generate headlines, and open enterprise doors. But they’re also quietly acknowledging that benchmark leadership alone doesn’t create a durable platform.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Developers return to the places where their tools, workflows, teammates, and accumulated work already live. Enterprises double down on the systems where their data, permissions, governance, and business processes are already connected. Every new integration makes that destination a little harder to leave, and every new workflow increases its pull. That’s what MCP, A2A, etc., are all about: increasing gravity around the models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every major AI company wants to become the place where AI-assisted work naturally happens, and they’re now amassing armies of forward deployed engineers and trying other means to get legacy infrastructure to tie back to their frontier models. The enterprise incumbents want the same thing, but from the opposite direction. They don’t need to own the frontier; instead they need to connect the frontier to the systems that already safely run the business.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s why I’m skeptical whenever someone confidently predicts that AI will sweep away enterprise software. I’ve seen this movie before. Developers absolutely live on the frontier, but enterprises don’t. Enterprises create value by connecting new capabilities to decades of accumulated applications, data, policies, and business processes. The newest model matters, and so does the newest agent framework. But neither creates much business value until it’s connected to customer records, financial systems, supply chains, HR data, and everything else enterprises already depend on.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s where incumbents still possess enormous gravitational pull. My employer, Oracle, certainly believes so, just as Microsoft, SAP, Salesforce, and ServiceNow do. (Disclosure: I run developer relations at Oracle, which participates in the Agentic AI Foundation.) Ironically, open protocols strengthen that position rather than weaken it. If every model can speak MCP and every agent can interoperate through common standards, enterprises gain the freedom to adopt whichever frontier technology looks best without rebuilding every integration. The protocol becomes interchangeable.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Open standards don’t stop gravity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this diminishes the importance of open standards. MCP succeeded because it solves a genuine problem. Developers shouldn’t have to build a custom connector every time an AI application needs access to a database or other business system. Neutral governance also matters because nobody wants foundational infrastructure controlled by a direct competitor. But we shouldn’t confuse open interfaces with open markets.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An enterprise may find it easy to swap one MCP-compatible model for another while still remaining deeply dependent on the place where its prompts, evaluations, security policies, and employee habits have accumulated. Again, we’ve seen this before. Kubernetes made workloads dramatically more portable without making AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud interchangeable. SQL has been standardized for decades, yet databases remain fiercely differentiated businesses. Standards reduce friction, but they rarely eliminate competitive advantage. They simply move it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In like manner, Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, and others are happily standardizing how models, agents, tools, and enterprise systems communicate because they don’t expect the connection itself to determine the winner. Instead they expect to win by becoming the place where AI-assisted work naturally accumulates. Along the way, we’re going to see copious quantities of code given away, increasing developer productivity for all and outsized financial bonanzas for a few. Game on.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[HOLLOWGRAPH malware turns Microsoft 365 calendars into an espionage channel]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft 365 calendars have become a hiding place for espionage malware, with commands and stolen files stashed inside appointments dated to the year 2050, researchers from Group-IB discovered. Targeted campaign tied to Iranian espionage activity The malware, which Group-IB calls HOLLOWGRAPH, is...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681861/it-security-nachrichten/hollowgraph-malware-turns-microsoft-365-calendars-into-an-espionage-channel/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681861/it-security-nachrichten/hollowgraph-malware-turns-microsoft-365-calendars-into-an-espionage-channel/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 19:37:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft 365 calendars have become a hiding place for espionage malware, with commands and stolen files stashed inside appointments dated to the year 2050, researchers from Group-IB discovered. Targeted campaign tied to Iranian espionage activity The malware, which Group-IB calls HOLLOWGRAPH, is one component of a bigger toolkit the company links with high confidence to the Cavern backdoor framework, a modular espionage toolkit built from separate plugins that each handle a different task, previously tied … <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/07/20/hollowgraph-malware-microsoft-365-calendar/" rel="nofollow">More <span class="meta-nav">→</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2026/07/20/hollowgraph-malware-microsoft-365-calendar/">HOLLOWGRAPH malware turns Microsoft 365 calendars into an espionage channel</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/">Help Net Security</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8570-1: Linux kernel vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - Foo-over-UDP (FOU);
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Drivers core;
  ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681611/unix-server/usn-8570-1-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681611/unix-server/usn-8570-1-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:18:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - Foo-over-UDP (FOU);
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Drivers core;
  - Null block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - DPLL subsystem;
  - GPIO subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - On-Chip Interconnect management framework;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - Modular ISDN driver;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - UACCE accelerator framework;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Network drivers;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PHY drivers;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - W1 Dallas's 1-wire bus driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - EFI Variable file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) client;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - SMB network file system;
  - Memory Management;
  - Memory management;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Netfilter;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - Perf events;
  - Hibernation control;
  - Timer subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Floating proportions library;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Networking core;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NET/ROM layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - Network traffic control;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - ALSA AC97 driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - Texas InstrumentS Audio (ASoC/HDA) drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
(CVE-2025-71158, CVE-2025-71160, CVE-2025-71161, CVE-2025-71162,
CVE-2025-71163, CVE-2025-71180, CVE-2025-71182, CVE-2025-71183,
CVE-2025-71184, CVE-2025-71185, CVE-2025-71186, CVE-2025-71187,
CVE-2025-71188, CVE-2025-71189, CVE-2025-71190, CVE-2025-71191,
CVE-2025-71192, CVE-2025-71193, CVE-2025-71194, CVE-2025-71195,
CVE-2025-71196, CVE-2025-71197, CVE-2025-71198, CVE-2025-71199,
CVE-2025-71200, CVE-2025-71201, CVE-2026-22976, CVE-2026-22977,
CVE-2026-22978, CVE-2026-22979, CVE-2026-22980, CVE-2026-22981,
CVE-2026-22982, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22986, CVE-2026-22987,
CVE-2026-22989, CVE-2026-22990, CVE-2026-22991, CVE-2026-22992,
CVE-2026-22993, CVE-2026-22994, CVE-2026-22996, CVE-2026-22997,
CVE-2026-22998, CVE-2026-22999, CVE-2026-23000, CVE-2026-23001,
CVE-2026-23002, CVE-2026-23003, CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23005,
CVE-2026-23006, CVE-2026-23007, CVE-2026-23008, CVE-2026-23009,
CVE-2026-23010, CVE-2026-23011, CVE-2026-23012, CVE-2026-23013,
CVE-2026-23014, CVE-2026-23015, CVE-2026-23017, CVE-2026-23018,
CVE-2026-23019, CVE-2026-23020, CVE-2026-23021, CVE-2026-23022,
CVE-2026-23023, CVE-2026-23024, CVE-2026-23025, CVE-2026-23026,
CVE-2026-23030, CVE-2026-23031, CVE-2026-23032, CVE-2026-23033,
CVE-2026-23034, CVE-2026-23035, CVE-2026-23036, CVE-2026-23037,
CVE-2026-23038, CVE-2026-23042, CVE-2026-23044, CVE-2026-23045,
CVE-2026-23046, CVE-2026-23047, CVE-2026-23049, CVE-2026-23050,
CVE-2026-23051, CVE-2026-23052, CVE-2026-23053, CVE-2026-23054,
CVE-2026-23055, CVE-2026-23056, CVE-2026-23057, CVE-2026-23058,
CVE-2026-23059, CVE-2026-23061, CVE-2026-23062, CVE-2026-23063,
CVE-2026-23064, CVE-2026-23065, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23067,
CVE-2026-23068, CVE-2026-23069, CVE-2026-23070, CVE-2026-23071,
CVE-2026-23072, CVE-2026-23073, CVE-2026-23075, CVE-2026-23076,
CVE-2026-23077, CVE-2026-23078, CVE-2026-23079, CVE-2026-23080,
CVE-2026-23081, CVE-2026-23083, CVE-2026-23084, CVE-2026-23085,
CVE-2026-23086, CVE-2026-23087, CVE-2026-23088, CVE-2026-23089,
CVE-2026-23090, CVE-2026-23092, CVE-2026-23093, CVE-2026-23094,
CVE-2026-23095, CVE-2026-23096, CVE-2026-23097, CVE-2026-23098,
CVE-2026-23099, CVE-2026-23100, CVE-2026-23101, CVE-2026-23102,
CVE-2026-23103, CVE-2026-23104, CVE-2026-23105, CVE-2026-23106,
CVE-2026-23107, CVE-2026-23108, CVE-2026-23109, CVE-2026-23110,
CVE-2026-23113, CVE-2026-23114, CVE-2026-23115, CVE-2026-23116,
CVE-2026-23118, CVE-2026-23119, CVE-2026-23120, CVE-2026-23121,
CVE-2026-23122, CVE-2026-23123, CVE-2026-23124, CVE-2026-23125,
CVE-2026-23126, CVE-2026-23128, CVE-2026-23129, CVE-2026-23130,
CVE-2026-23131, CVE-2026-23133, CVE-2026-23135, CVE-2026-23136,
CVE-2026-23137, CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23139, CVE-2026-23140,
CVE-2026-23141, CVE-2026-23142, CVE-2026-23143, CVE-2026-23144,
CVE-2026-23145, CVE-2026-23146, CVE-2026-23147, CVE-2026-23148,
CVE-2026-23150, CVE-2026-23151, CVE-2026-23152, CVE-2026-23154,
CVE-2026-23156, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23158, CVE-2026-23159,
CVE-2026-23160, CVE-2026-23161, CVE-2026-23162, CVE-2026-23163,
CVE-2026-23164, CVE-2026-23165, CVE-2026-23166, CVE-2026-23167,
CVE-2026-23168, CVE-2026-23169, CVE-2026-23170, CVE-2026-23171,
CVE-2026-23172, CVE-2026-23173, CVE-2026-23212, CVE-2026-31444,
CVE-2026-46290, CVE-2026-46317, CVE-2026-53277)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8569-1: Linux kernel (HWE) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681610/unix-server/usn-8569-1-linux-kernel-hwe-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681610/unix-server/usn-8569-1-linux-kernel-hwe-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:18:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that the Linux kernel did not properly handle shared page
fragments during socket buffer operations, collectively known as Dirty
Frag. A logic flaw existed in the XFRM ESP-in-TCP subsystem and in the
RxRPC networking subsystem when processing paged fragments. A local
attacker could use this to escalate privileges, or possibly escape a
container. (CVE-2026-43284, CVE-2026-43500, CVE-2026-45998, CVE-2026-46000)

It was discovered that a logic flaw existed in the XFRM ESP-in-TCP
subsystem in the Linux kernel when handling socket buffer fragments. This
flaw is known as Fragnesia. A local attacker could use this to escalate
privileges, or possibly escape a container. (CVE-2026-43503,
CVE-2026-46300)

Qualys discovered that a race condition existed in the ptrace subsystem of
the Linux kernel when privileged processes are exiting. An unprivileged
local attacker could use this issue to expose sensitive information.
(CVE-2026-46333)

Tristan Madani discovered that Ubuntu Linux kernel 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0
contain a memory leak when handling AppArmor notifications. A local
attacker could use this to cause resource exhaustion. (CVE-2026-47326)

Tristan Madani discovered that Ubuntu Linux kernel 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0
contain a NULL pointer dereference when handling AppArmor notifications. A
local attacker could use this to cause a kernel oops. (CVE-2026-47327)

Tristan Madani discovered that Ubuntu Linux kernel 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0
contained an invalid free when handling AppArmor notifications. A local
attacker could use this to corrupt kernel memory. (CVE-2026-47328)

Tristan Madani discovered that Ubuntu Linux kernel 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0
contained insufficient validation of AppArmor notification responses. A
local attacker could use this to allow crafted responses to be processed.
(CVE-2026-47329)

Tristan Madani discovered that Ubuntu Linux kernel 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0 used
an uninitialized variable when handling AppArmor notifications. A local
attacker could use this to cause incorrect caching of data.
(CVE-2026-47330)

Tristan Madani discovered that Ubuntu Linux kernel 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0
contained an out-of-bounds (OOB) read when handling AppArmor notifications.
A local attacker could use this to cause information disclosure of kernel
memory. (CVE-2026-47332)

Tristan Madani discovered that Ubuntu Linux kernel 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0
contained a out-of-bounds (OOB) read when handling AppArmor notifications.
A local attacker could use this to cause kernel memory corruption and,
theoretically, influence processing of AppArmor policies. (CVE-2026-47333)

Tristan Madani discovered that Ubuntu Linux kernel 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0
contained incorrect holding of locks when handling AppArmor notifications.
A local attacker could use this to cause a kernel panic or deadlock.
(CVE-2026-47334)

Tristan Madani and Trevor Lawrence have each independently discovered that
Ubuntu Linux kernel 6.8, 6.17 and 7.0 contained a NULL pointer dereference
when handling AppArmor network socket mediation. A local attacker could use
this to cause a kernel oops. (CVE-2026-47337)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - PSP security protocol;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - User-Mode Linux (UML);
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Intel NPU Driver;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Ublk userspace block driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - TPM device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - FWCTL subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Microsoft Hyper-V drivers;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - I3C subsystem;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device core drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - Chrome hardware platform drivers;
  - ACPI WMI driver;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - MediaTek PM domains;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - MPAM driver;
  - Amlogic Meson reset controller drivers;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - NVIDIA Tegra Control Backbone (CBB) driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Type-C support driver;
  - TI TPS6598x USB Power Delivery controller driver;
  - USB over IP driver;
  - vDPA drivers;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM AMD SEV Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - 9P distributed file system;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - AFS file system;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - HugeTLB file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Overlay file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - DRM TTM subsystem;
  - Codetag library;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - Memory management;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Freescale ENETC Ethernet drivers;
  - Memory Management;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Networking core;
  - Netfilter;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - IPC subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Timer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Scatterlist API;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - 802.1Q VLAN protocol;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - Landlock security;
  - SELinux security module;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31574, CVE-2026-31575, CVE-2026-31576,
CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31579, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584,
CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588,
CVE-2026-31589, CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31591, CVE-2026-31592,
CVE-2026-31593, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31600,
CVE-2026-31601, CVE-2026-31602, CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31604,
CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606, CVE-2026-31607, CVE-2026-31608,
CVE-2026-31609, CVE-2026-31610, CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612,
CVE-2026-31613, CVE-2026-31614, CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616,
CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618, CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31620,
CVE-2026-31621, CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624,
CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628,
CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31686, CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31696,
CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700,
CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31703, CVE-2026-31704,
CVE-2026-31705, CVE-2026-31706, CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708,
CVE-2026-31709, CVE-2026-31710, CVE-2026-31711, CVE-2026-31712,
CVE-2026-31713, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715, CVE-2026-31716,
CVE-2026-31717, CVE-2026-31718, CVE-2026-31719, CVE-2026-43058,
CVE-2026-43071, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073, CVE-2026-43348,
CVE-2026-43349, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43491,
CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43493, CVE-2026-43494, CVE-2026-43495,
CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43498, CVE-2026-43499,
CVE-2026-43501, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835,
CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45837, CVE-2026-45838, CVE-2026-45839,
CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842, CVE-2026-45843,
CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846, CVE-2026-45986,
CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45988, CVE-2026-45989, CVE-2026-45990,
CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994, CVE-2026-45995, CVE-2026-45996,
CVE-2026-45997, CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46001, CVE-2026-46002,
CVE-2026-46003, CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006,
CVE-2026-46007, CVE-2026-46008, CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46010,
CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012, CVE-2026-46013, CVE-2026-46014,
CVE-2026-46015, CVE-2026-46016, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019,
CVE-2026-46020, CVE-2026-46021, CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023,
CVE-2026-46024, CVE-2026-46025, CVE-2026-46026, CVE-2026-46027,
CVE-2026-46028, CVE-2026-46029, CVE-2026-46030, CVE-2026-46031,
CVE-2026-46032, CVE-2026-46033, CVE-2026-46034, CVE-2026-46035,
CVE-2026-46036, CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46038, CVE-2026-46039,
CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041, CVE-2026-46042, CVE-2026-46043,
CVE-2026-46044, CVE-2026-46045, CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047,
CVE-2026-46049, CVE-2026-46050, CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052,
CVE-2026-46053, CVE-2026-46054, CVE-2026-46056, CVE-2026-46057,
CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46059, CVE-2026-46060, CVE-2026-46061,
CVE-2026-46062, CVE-2026-46063, CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065,
CVE-2026-46066, CVE-2026-46067, CVE-2026-46068, CVE-2026-46069,
CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46071, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073,
CVE-2026-46074, CVE-2026-46075, CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077,
CVE-2026-46078, CVE-2026-46079, CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46081,
CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083, CVE-2026-46084, CVE-2026-46085,
CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46087, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089,
CVE-2026-46090, CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46093,
CVE-2026-46094, CVE-2026-46095, CVE-2026-46096, CVE-2026-46097,
CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46100, CVE-2026-46101,
CVE-2026-46102, CVE-2026-46103, CVE-2026-46104, CVE-2026-46105,
CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46109,
CVE-2026-46110, CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113,
CVE-2026-46114, CVE-2026-46115, CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117,
CVE-2026-46118, CVE-2026-46119, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125,
CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129,
CVE-2026-46130, CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133,
CVE-2026-46134, CVE-2026-46135, CVE-2026-46136, CVE-2026-46137,
CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139, CVE-2026-46140, CVE-2026-46141,
CVE-2026-46142, CVE-2026-46143, CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145,
CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46147, CVE-2026-46148, CVE-2026-46149,
CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151, CVE-2026-46152, CVE-2026-46153,
CVE-2026-46154, CVE-2026-46155, CVE-2026-46156, CVE-2026-46157,
CVE-2026-46158, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160, CVE-2026-46161,
CVE-2026-46162, CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46165,
CVE-2026-46166, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46169,
CVE-2026-46170, CVE-2026-46171, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173,
CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46175, CVE-2026-46176, CVE-2026-46177,
CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179, CVE-2026-46180, CVE-2026-46181,
CVE-2026-46182, CVE-2026-46183, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46185,
CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46188, CVE-2026-46189,
CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46192, CVE-2026-46193,
CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46195, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197,
CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201,
CVE-2026-46202, CVE-2026-46203, CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205,
CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46207, CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209,
CVE-2026-46210, CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46213,
CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46215, CVE-2026-46216, CVE-2026-46218,
CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46221, CVE-2026-46222,
CVE-2026-46223, CVE-2026-46224, CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226,
CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46228, CVE-2026-46229, CVE-2026-46230,
CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234,
CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46239,
CVE-2026-46240, CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46242, CVE-2026-46243,
CVE-2026-46244, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46275,
CVE-2026-46276, CVE-2026-46277, CVE-2026-46278, CVE-2026-46279,
CVE-2026-46280, CVE-2026-46281, CVE-2026-46282, CVE-2026-46283,
CVE-2026-46284, CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286, CVE-2026-46287,
CVE-2026-46288, CVE-2026-46289, CVE-2026-46290, CVE-2026-46291,
CVE-2026-46292, CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46295,
CVE-2026-46296, CVE-2026-46297, CVE-2026-46298, CVE-2026-46299,
CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46302, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304,
CVE-2026-46305, CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46308,
CVE-2026-46309, CVE-2026-46310, CVE-2026-46311, CVE-2026-46312,
CVE-2026-46313, CVE-2026-46314, CVE-2026-46315, CVE-2026-46316,
CVE-2026-46317, CVE-2026-46318, CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-46320,
CVE-2026-46321, CVE-2026-46322, CVE-2026-46323, CVE-2026-46324,
CVE-2026-46332, CVE-2026-52904, CVE-2026-52905, CVE-2026-52906,
CVE-2026-52907, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52913,
CVE-2026-52914, CVE-2026-52915, CVE-2026-52916, CVE-2026-52918,
CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52921, CVE-2026-52922,
CVE-2026-52923, CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52926, CVE-2026-52927,
CVE-2026-52928, CVE-2026-52931, CVE-2026-52932, CVE-2026-52933,
CVE-2026-52934, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52937, CVE-2026-52941,
CVE-2026-52943, CVE-2026-52944, CVE-2026-52949, CVE-2026-52950,
CVE-2026-52951, CVE-2026-52952, CVE-2026-52953, CVE-2026-52954,
CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52956, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958,
CVE-2026-52959, CVE-2026-52960, CVE-2026-52961, CVE-2026-52962,
CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964, CVE-2026-52965, CVE-2026-52967,
CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52971,
CVE-2026-52973, CVE-2026-52974, CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52976,
CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52978, CVE-2026-52979, CVE-2026-52980,
CVE-2026-52981, CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52983, CVE-2026-52984,
CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52987, CVE-2026-52988,
CVE-2026-52989, CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52991, CVE-2026-52992,
CVE-2026-52993, CVE-2026-52994, CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52996,
CVE-2026-52997, CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53000,
CVE-2026-53001, CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004,
CVE-2026-53005, CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53007, CVE-2026-53008,
CVE-2026-53009, CVE-2026-53010, CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012,
CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014, CVE-2026-53015, CVE-2026-53016,
CVE-2026-53017, CVE-2026-53018, CVE-2026-53019, CVE-2026-53020,
CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53024,
CVE-2026-53025, CVE-2026-53026, CVE-2026-53027, CVE-2026-53028,
CVE-2026-53029, CVE-2026-53030, CVE-2026-53031, CVE-2026-53032,
CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034, CVE-2026-53035, CVE-2026-53036,
CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53038, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040,
CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53042, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53044,
CVE-2026-53045, CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048,
CVE-2026-53049, CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53051, CVE-2026-53052,
CVE-2026-53053, CVE-2026-53054, CVE-2026-53055, CVE-2026-53056,
CVE-2026-53057, CVE-2026-53058, CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060,
CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53063, CVE-2026-53064,
CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066, CVE-2026-53067, CVE-2026-53068,
CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53070, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072,
CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076,
CVE-2026-53077, CVE-2026-53078, CVE-2026-53079, CVE-2026-53080,
CVE-2026-53081, CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084,
CVE-2026-53085, CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53087, CVE-2026-53088,
CVE-2026-53089, CVE-2026-53090, CVE-2026-53091, CVE-2026-53092,
CVE-2026-53093, CVE-2026-53094, CVE-2026-53095, CVE-2026-53096,
CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098, CVE-2026-53099, CVE-2026-53100,
CVE-2026-53101, CVE-2026-53102, CVE-2026-53103, CVE-2026-53104,
CVE-2026-53105, CVE-2026-53106, CVE-2026-53107, CVE-2026-53108,
CVE-2026-53109, CVE-2026-53110, CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112,
CVE-2026-53113, CVE-2026-53114, CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53116,
CVE-2026-53117, CVE-2026-53118, CVE-2026-53119, CVE-2026-53120,
CVE-2026-53121, CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53124,
CVE-2026-53125, CVE-2026-53126, CVE-2026-53127, CVE-2026-53128,
CVE-2026-53129, CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53174, CVE-2026-53277,
CVE-2026-53278, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53280, CVE-2026-53281,
CVE-2026-53282, CVE-2026-53283, CVE-2026-53284, CVE-2026-53285,
CVE-2026-53286, CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53288, CVE-2026-53289,
CVE-2026-53290, CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53292, CVE-2026-53293,
CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53297,
CVE-2026-53298, CVE-2026-53299, CVE-2026-53300, CVE-2026-53301,
CVE-2026-53302, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53305,
CVE-2026-53306, CVE-2026-53307, CVE-2026-53308, CVE-2026-53309,
CVE-2026-53310, CVE-2026-53311, CVE-2026-53312, CVE-2026-53313,
CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53315, CVE-2026-53316, CVE-2026-53317,
CVE-2026-53318, CVE-2026-53319, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53321,
CVE-2026-53322, CVE-2026-53323, CVE-2026-53324, CVE-2026-53357,
CVE-2026-53358, CVE-2026-53360, CVE-2026-53364, CVE-2026-53365)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Safety guardrails blocked Hugging Face's defenders, not the attacker, when an AI agent breached its systems]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hugging Face’s incident response team first turned to frontier AI models to analyze a breach of the company’s production infrastructure, and the models refused to help. Commercial safety guardrails built to stop attackers blocked every forensic query because they treated the IR team’s real exploi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681589/it-nachrichten/safety-guardrails-blocked-hugging-faces-defenders-not-the-attacker-when-an-ai-agent-breached-its-systems/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681589/it-nachrichten/safety-guardrails-blocked-hugging-faces-defenders-not-the-attacker-when-an-ai-agent-breached-its-systems/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:03:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugging Face’s incident response team first turned to frontier AI models to analyze a breach of the company’s production infrastructure, and the models refused to help. Commercial safety guardrails built to stop attackers blocked every forensic query because they treated the IR team’s real exploit data the same way they would treat a live attack.</p><p>The attacker, an autonomous AI agent running the campaign end to end, moved laterally across the Hugging Face infrastructure for a weekend, undetected and unstopped.</p><p>Security leaders are quick to recognize the pattern and diagnose what went wrong. “I’ve seen versions of this during red-team exercises and internal security testing, but this is one of the first high-profile examples where it materially affected real incident response,” said Merritt Baer, senior adviser to Andesite, G2I, and AppOmni and former Deputy CISO at AWS.</p><p>None of this is unique to Hugging Face, Baer said. “Commercial frontier models optimize for preventing misuse. They generally have no cryptographic or organizational way to determine whether the person asking ‘analyze this malware’ is an incident responder or the malware author.”</p><h2><b>A malicious dataset opened two code-execution paths</b></h2><p>On July 16, Hugging Face <a href="https://huggingface.co/blog/security-incident-july-2026">disclosed</a> that an autonomous AI agent system had compromised its production infrastructure, gaining unauthorized access to a limited set of internal datasets and several service credentials. The company verified that its software supply chain was clean and found no evidence of tampering with public models, datasets, or Spaces. </p><p>Hugging Face is still assessing whether the intrusion touched any partner or customer data and says it will contact affected parties directly as required. But few enterprise threat models had accounted for the attacker Hugging Face faced. An autonomous agent ran the entire campaign from initial access through credential harvesting. No human guided it.</p><p>The entry point was a malicious dataset. When the data-processing pipeline ingested it, the dataset triggered code execution in two ways, through a remote-code loader and through a template-injection flaw in dataset configuration files. No admission gate screened the file before it reached a processing worker, the compute job assigned to each dataset. Initial access came through the data pipeline itself, a route that worked because most enterprise security teams treat the data feeding their pipelines as trusted input rather than an attack surface.</p><p>Worker isolation did not hold. From that first foothold, the agent broke out onto the node running the workload, then harvested cloud and cluster credentials scoped broadly enough to reach multiple internal clusters, all of it inside a single weekend. Hugging Face described the agent framework as executing thousands of individual actions through a swarm of short-lived sandboxes, with self-migrating command-and-control staged on public services. The disclosure adds that the framework appeared to be built on an agentic security-research harness, which would put tooling designed for red-team work behind a live intrusion. </p><h2><b>Why the defenders’ queries looked like attacks</b></h2><p>Investigators reconstructed more than 17,000 recorded events using AI-driven analysis agents of their own.</p><p>First attempts at the log analysis ran on frontier models behind commercial APIs. Defenders’ steps included submitting real attack commands, exploit payloads, and command-and-control artifacts for classification, but safety guardrails blocked the requests outright.</p><p>Baer traced the block to the prompts themselves. “The same prompts that are most valuable during an active intrusion, shell commands, exploit chains, credential dumps, persistence mechanisms, lateral movement, are exactly the prompts most likely to trigger safety systems,” she told VentureBeat. “As AI becomes embedded in security operations, this becomes an operational resilience issue rather than merely a model policy issue.”</p><h2><b>The forensic analysis finished on GLM 5.2</b></h2><p>GLM 5.2, an open-weight model deployed on Hugging Face’s own infrastructure, took the job the commercial APIs refused. No attacker data left the company’s environment. “This experience points to a gap worth planning for,” the company wrote in its disclosure. Hugging Face does not know which model powered the agents. It could have been a jailbroken hosted model or an open-weight model running without restrictions. Either way, the disclosure continued, “the attacker was bound by no usage policy, while our own forensic work was blocked by the guardrails of the hosted models we first tried.” Hugging Face drew that line itself, writing that the experience is not an argument against safety measures on hosted models and that it is sharing the feedback with the providers concerned.</p><h2><b>What authenticated trust changes</b></h2><p>The industry, Baer argued, needs to move past treating AI safety as a content moderation problem. “Security operations require something different. Authenticated trust.” Instead of asking whether anyone should receive an answer, the question becomes whether an authenticated security team, operating under enterprise controls, should receive it. “The model shouldn’t only understand what is being asked. It should understand who is asking, why, and under what governance.”</p><p>“Organizations already build contingency plans for cloud outages, identity provider failures, or EDR failures,” Baer wrote. “AI assistants are becoming another dependency.”</p><p>Her advice on IR playbooks was blunt. “A mature incident response plan should assume that during a severe incident, commercial AI APIs may refuse requests, API rate limits may become unavailable, internet connectivity may be impaired, and data governance rules may prohibit uploading forensic evidence externally.” The lesson, she wrote in her emailed answers, “isn’t ‘don’t use commercial models.’ It’s ‘don’t make them a single point of failure.’”</p><h2><b>AI-enabled attacks rose 89% year-over-year</b></h2><p>Autonomous AI-driven attacks are not limited to AI platforms. <a href="https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/global-threat-report/">CrowdStrike’s 2026 Global Threat Report</a> documented AI-enabled adversary operations increasing by 89% year over year, with average breakout times falling to 29 minutes. Enterprises running AI workloads in production with agentic access to their pipelines face similar exposure.</p><p>Six control domains determined the blast radius and recovery speed at Hugging Face. Each one maps to a concrete action security leaders can take before the next autonomous-agent breach arrives.</p><h2><b>AI Pipeline Breach Response Playbook</b></h2><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Control Domain</b></p></td><td><p><b>What Broke</b></p></td><td><p><b>Monday Action</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dataset admission controls</p></td><td><p>Two code-execution paths were exploited. No admission gate validated the dataset before it reached a processing worker. The data pipeline became the initial access infrastructure.</p></td><td><p>Require sandbox execution and static analysis of all datasets before they reach workers. Block remote-code loaders and template-injection paths by default. Audit for any path granting code execution to untrusted content. Report to the board as a supply-chain risk.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Worker-to-node privilege boundaries</p></td><td><p>Worker isolation failed to prevent escalation to the node. The agent gained cluster credentials because the workload-infrastructure boundary was never enforced at container runtime.</p></td><td><p>Enforce hard privilege boundaries between workers and nodes. Deploy container runtime security to prevent workload escape. Audit whether workers can reach node-level APIs or credential stores. Include in the next penetration test scope.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Credential exposure</p></td><td><p>Cloud and cluster credentials harvested after node access. The scope was broad enough for lateral movement across multiple clusters over a weekend.</p></td><td><p>Rotate credentials on a scheduled cadence and after any anomaly alert. Scope to the minimum cluster and service. Deploy monitoring that flags access from unexpected nodes at machine speed. Map blast radius for board reporting.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Machine-speed detection</p></td><td><p>Thousands of actions through short-lived sandboxes with self-migrating C2. AI-assisted anomaly detection surfaced the campaign after a weekend of lateral movement, per the disclosure.</p></td><td><p>Calibrate detection for machine-speed patterns. Ensure high-severity alerts page responders in minutes, regardless of time. Audit SIEM rules for detecting thousands of short-lived executions within a single hour.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Private AI forensic capacity</p></td><td><p>Commercial APIs blocked forensic analysis. Guardrails screened query content, never analyst identity. Investigation ran on GLM 5.2 privately.</p></td><td><p>Deploy a capable open-weight model on private infrastructure before an incident. Test against real forensic workflows. Ensure IR playbook includes fallback for when commercial APIs refuse. Document gap for cyber insurance.</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Autonomous-agent threat modeling</p></td><td><p>The campaign matched the forecast agentic-attacker scenario, but no threat model had operationalized it. LLM powering the agent is still unknown.</p></td><td><p>Add autonomous AI agents as a distinct adversary class with machine-speed decision cycles. Run tabletop at agent speed. Present results to the board as evidence that timelines need recalibration. Include in the cyber insurance application.</p></td></tr></tbody></table><h2><b>The board question is operational resilience</b></h2><p>“The question for directors is simple. What happens if one of our critical security tools becomes unavailable during the exact moment we need it most?” Baer framed that as operational resilience, not AI policy. </p><p>She would have boards take that framing straight to management and press for specifics. “Have we actually exercised that fallback during tabletop exercises? How quickly can we switch during an incident?” Procurement needs to change alongside governance, starting with the questions buyers ask. Security teams evaluating AI vendors should ask about their process for authenticated incident responders, whether enterprise customers receive different handling during verified incidents, and whether models can be deployed privately. “Those questions belong alongside uptime, privacy, and compliance,” Baer said.</p><p>“The biggest takeaway isn’t that safety guardrails are ‘bad.’ They’re doing what they were designed to do,” she argued. </p><p>Her larger point is that the threat model itself has changed. “For decades, defenders had better tools than attackers because they operated inside trusted enterprise environments. With foundation models, both sides increasingly use the same capabilities, but one side is constrained by enterprise governance, policy, compliance, and safety controls, while the adversary simply downloads an uncensored open-weight model and keeps going. That’s a new kind of asymmetry,” she added. “The organizations that handle it best won’t necessarily be the ones with the most powerful AI. They’ll be the ones that architect AI as a resilient security capability rather than a single cloud service.”</p><p>Hugging Face has contained the intrusion, rebuilt compromised nodes, rotated credentials, and reported the incident to law enforcement. The company recommends that all users rotate access tokens and review recent account activity. Mid-incident, Hugging Face found out whether its own AI tooling would be available, and the first answer was no. Security leaders running AI in production should find out in incident response planning instead, before an autonomous agent forces the test.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8568-1: Linux kernel (OEM) vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security iss...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681577/unix-server/usn-8568-1-linux-kernel-oem-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681577/unix-server/usn-8568-1-linux-kernel-oem-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:01:28 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - PSP security protocol;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - User-Mode Linux (UML);
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Intel NPU Driver;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Ublk userspace block driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - FWCTL subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - I3C subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - Chrome hardware platform drivers;
  - ACPI WMI driver;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - MediaTek PM domains;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - MPAM driver;
  - Amlogic Meson reset controller drivers;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - NVIDIA Tegra Control Backbone (CBB) driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB Type-C support driver;
  - TI TPS6598x USB Power Delivery controller driver;
  - vDPA drivers;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM AMD SEV Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - HugeTLB file system;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - DRM TTM subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Freescale ENETC Ethernet drivers;
  - Memory Management;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Networking core;
  - Netfilter;
  - Network traffic control;
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - IPC subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Memory management;
  - 802.1Q VLAN protocol;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Multipath TCP;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - RDS protocol;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - SELinux security module;
  - ALSA framework;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - KVM subsystem;
(CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496,
CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43498, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45837, CVE-2026-45838,
CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842,
CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846,
CVE-2026-46104, CVE-2026-46105, CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107,
CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46109, CVE-2026-46110, CVE-2026-46111,
CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113, CVE-2026-46114, CVE-2026-46116,
CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46118, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125,
CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129,
CVE-2026-46130, CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133,
CVE-2026-46134, CVE-2026-46136, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139,
CVE-2026-46140, CVE-2026-46141, CVE-2026-46142, CVE-2026-46143,
CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46147,
CVE-2026-46148, CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151,
CVE-2026-46152, CVE-2026-46153, CVE-2026-46154, CVE-2026-46156,
CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46158, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160,
CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46162, CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164,
CVE-2026-46165, CVE-2026-46166, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46170, CVE-2026-46171, CVE-2026-46172,
CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46175, CVE-2026-46176,
CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179, CVE-2026-46180,
CVE-2026-46181, CVE-2026-46182, CVE-2026-46183, CVE-2026-46184,
CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46188, CVE-2026-46189,
CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46192, CVE-2026-46193,
CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201, CVE-2026-46202,
CVE-2026-46203, CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206,
CVE-2026-46207, CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46210,
CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46213, CVE-2026-46214,
CVE-2026-46215, CVE-2026-46216, CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219,
CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46221, CVE-2026-46222, CVE-2026-46223,
CVE-2026-46224, CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227,
CVE-2026-46228, CVE-2026-46229, CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231,
CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46235,
CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46239, CVE-2026-46240,
CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46242, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274,
CVE-2026-46275, CVE-2026-46290, CVE-2026-46291, CVE-2026-46292,
CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46295, CVE-2026-46296,
CVE-2026-46297, CVE-2026-46298, CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301,
CVE-2026-46302, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46305,
CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46308, CVE-2026-46309,
CVE-2026-46310, CVE-2026-46311, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46313,
CVE-2026-46314, CVE-2026-46315, CVE-2026-46317, CVE-2026-46318,
CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-46320, CVE-2026-46321, CVE-2026-46322,
CVE-2026-46324, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52913,
CVE-2026-52914, CVE-2026-52915, CVE-2026-52916, CVE-2026-52918,
CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52921, CVE-2026-52922,
CVE-2026-52923, CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52926, CVE-2026-52927,
CVE-2026-52928, CVE-2026-52931, CVE-2026-52932, CVE-2026-52934,
CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52937, CVE-2026-52941, CVE-2026-52943,
CVE-2026-52944, CVE-2026-52949, CVE-2026-52950, CVE-2026-52951,
CVE-2026-52952, CVE-2026-52953, CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955,
CVE-2026-52956, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52959,
CVE-2026-52960, CVE-2026-52961, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963,
CVE-2026-52964, CVE-2026-52965, CVE-2026-52967, CVE-2026-52968,
CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52971, CVE-2026-52973,
CVE-2026-52974, CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52976, CVE-2026-52977,
CVE-2026-52978, CVE-2026-52979, CVE-2026-52980, CVE-2026-52981,
CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52983, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985,
CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52987, CVE-2026-52988, CVE-2026-52989,
CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52991, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993,
CVE-2026-52994, CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52996, CVE-2026-52997,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53000, CVE-2026-53001,
CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53005,
CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53007, CVE-2026-53008, CVE-2026-53009,
CVE-2026-53010, CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013,
CVE-2026-53014, CVE-2026-53015, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53017,
CVE-2026-53018, CVE-2026-53019, CVE-2026-53020, CVE-2026-53021,
CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53024, CVE-2026-53025,
CVE-2026-53026, CVE-2026-53027, CVE-2026-53028, CVE-2026-53029,
CVE-2026-53030, CVE-2026-53031, CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033,
CVE-2026-53034, CVE-2026-53035, CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037,
CVE-2026-53038, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041,
CVE-2026-53042, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53044, CVE-2026-53045,
CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049,
CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53051, CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53053,
CVE-2026-53054, CVE-2026-53055, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53057,
CVE-2026-53058, CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061,
CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53063, CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065,
CVE-2026-53066, CVE-2026-53067, CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069,
CVE-2026-53070, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073,
CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53078, CVE-2026-53079, CVE-2026-53080, CVE-2026-53081,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084, CVE-2026-53085,
CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53087, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53089,
CVE-2026-53090, CVE-2026-53091, CVE-2026-53092, CVE-2026-53093,
CVE-2026-53094, CVE-2026-53095, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097,
CVE-2026-53098, CVE-2026-53099, CVE-2026-53100, CVE-2026-53101,
CVE-2026-53102, CVE-2026-53103, CVE-2026-53104, CVE-2026-53105,
CVE-2026-53106, CVE-2026-53107, CVE-2026-53108, CVE-2026-53109,
CVE-2026-53110, CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53113,
CVE-2026-53114, CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53116, CVE-2026-53117,
CVE-2026-53118, CVE-2026-53119, CVE-2026-53120, CVE-2026-53121,
CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53124, CVE-2026-53125,
CVE-2026-53126, CVE-2026-53127, CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53129,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53277, CVE-2026-53278, CVE-2026-53279,
CVE-2026-53280, CVE-2026-53281, CVE-2026-53282, CVE-2026-53283,
CVE-2026-53284, CVE-2026-53285, CVE-2026-53286, CVE-2026-53287,
CVE-2026-53288, CVE-2026-53289, CVE-2026-53290, CVE-2026-53291,
CVE-2026-53292, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294, CVE-2026-53295,
CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53297, CVE-2026-53298, CVE-2026-53299,
CVE-2026-53300, CVE-2026-53301, CVE-2026-53302, CVE-2026-53303,
CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53305, CVE-2026-53306, CVE-2026-53307,
CVE-2026-53308, CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53310, CVE-2026-53311,
CVE-2026-53312, CVE-2026-53313, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53315,
CVE-2026-53316, CVE-2026-53317, CVE-2026-53318, CVE-2026-53319,
CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53321, CVE-2026-53322, CVE-2026-53323,
CVE-2026-53324, CVE-2026-53357, CVE-2026-53358, CVE-2026-53360,
CVE-2026-53364, CVE-2026-53365)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8566-1: Linux kernel vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security iss...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681568/unix-server/usn-8566-1-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681568/unix-server/usn-8566-1-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:46:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - PSP security protocol;
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - PowerPC architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - User-Mode Linux (UML);
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Intel NPU Driver;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Ublk userspace block driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - FWCTL subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - I3C subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - IOMMU subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - Chrome hardware platform drivers;
  - ACPI WMI driver;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - MediaTek PM domains;
  - Power supply drivers;
  - MPAM driver;
  - Amlogic Meson reset controller drivers;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - NVIDIA Tegra Control Backbone (CBB) driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Greybus lights staging drivers;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - TTY drivers;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB Type-C support driver;
  - TI TPS6598x USB Power Delivery controller driver;
  - vDPA drivers;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM AMD SEV Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - HugeTLB file system;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Overlay file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - DRM TTM subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Freescale ENETC Ethernet drivers;
  - Memory Management;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Networking core;
  - Netfilter;
  - Network traffic control;
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - IPC subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Scheduler infrastructure;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Memory management;
  - 802.1Q VLAN protocol;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Multipath TCP;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Phonet protocol;
  - RDS protocol;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - SELinux security module;
  - ALSA framework;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - KVM subsystem;
(CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43495, CVE-2026-43496,
CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43498, CVE-2026-43502, CVE-2026-45834,
CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45837, CVE-2026-45838,
CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842,
CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846,
CVE-2026-46104, CVE-2026-46105, CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107,
CVE-2026-46108, CVE-2026-46109, CVE-2026-46110, CVE-2026-46111,
CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113, CVE-2026-46114, CVE-2026-46116,
CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46118, CVE-2026-46120, CVE-2026-46121,
CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124, CVE-2026-46125,
CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128, CVE-2026-46129,
CVE-2026-46130, CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133,
CVE-2026-46134, CVE-2026-46136, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139,
CVE-2026-46140, CVE-2026-46141, CVE-2026-46142, CVE-2026-46143,
CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145, CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46147,
CVE-2026-46148, CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151,
CVE-2026-46152, CVE-2026-46153, CVE-2026-46154, CVE-2026-46156,
CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46158, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160,
CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46162, CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164,
CVE-2026-46165, CVE-2026-46166, CVE-2026-46167, CVE-2026-46168,
CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46170, CVE-2026-46171, CVE-2026-46172,
CVE-2026-46173, CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46175, CVE-2026-46176,
CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178, CVE-2026-46179, CVE-2026-46180,
CVE-2026-46181, CVE-2026-46182, CVE-2026-46183, CVE-2026-46184,
CVE-2026-46186, CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46188, CVE-2026-46189,
CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191, CVE-2026-46192, CVE-2026-46193,
CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197, CVE-2026-46198,
CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201, CVE-2026-46202,
CVE-2026-46203, CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206,
CVE-2026-46207, CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46210,
CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212, CVE-2026-46213, CVE-2026-46214,
CVE-2026-46215, CVE-2026-46216, CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219,
CVE-2026-46220, CVE-2026-46221, CVE-2026-46222, CVE-2026-46223,
CVE-2026-46224, CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227,
CVE-2026-46228, CVE-2026-46229, CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231,
CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233, CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46235,
CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238, CVE-2026-46239, CVE-2026-46240,
CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46242, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274,
CVE-2026-46275, CVE-2026-46290, CVE-2026-46291, CVE-2026-46292,
CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294, CVE-2026-46295, CVE-2026-46296,
CVE-2026-46297, CVE-2026-46298, CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301,
CVE-2026-46302, CVE-2026-46303, CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46305,
CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46308, CVE-2026-46309,
CVE-2026-46310, CVE-2026-46311, CVE-2026-46312, CVE-2026-46313,
CVE-2026-46314, CVE-2026-46315, CVE-2026-46317, CVE-2026-46318,
CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-46320, CVE-2026-46321, CVE-2026-46322,
CVE-2026-46324, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52912, CVE-2026-52913,
CVE-2026-52914, CVE-2026-52915, CVE-2026-52916, CVE-2026-52918,
CVE-2026-52919, CVE-2026-52920, CVE-2026-52921, CVE-2026-52922,
CVE-2026-52923, CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52926, CVE-2026-52927,
CVE-2026-52928, CVE-2026-52931, CVE-2026-52932, CVE-2026-52934,
CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52937, CVE-2026-52941, CVE-2026-52943,
CVE-2026-52944, CVE-2026-52949, CVE-2026-52950, CVE-2026-52951,
CVE-2026-52952, CVE-2026-52953, CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955,
CVE-2026-52956, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958, CVE-2026-52959,
CVE-2026-52960, CVE-2026-52961, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963,
CVE-2026-52964, CVE-2026-52965, CVE-2026-52967, CVE-2026-52968,
CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970, CVE-2026-52971, CVE-2026-52973,
CVE-2026-52974, CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52976, CVE-2026-52977,
CVE-2026-52978, CVE-2026-52979, CVE-2026-52980, CVE-2026-52981,
CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52983, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985,
CVE-2026-52986, CVE-2026-52987, CVE-2026-52988, CVE-2026-52989,
CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52991, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993,
CVE-2026-52994, CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52996, CVE-2026-52997,
CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53000, CVE-2026-53001,
CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53005,
CVE-2026-53006, CVE-2026-53007, CVE-2026-53008, CVE-2026-53009,
CVE-2026-53010, CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013,
CVE-2026-53014, CVE-2026-53015, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53017,
CVE-2026-53018, CVE-2026-53019, CVE-2026-53020, CVE-2026-53021,
CVE-2026-53022, CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53024, CVE-2026-53025,
CVE-2026-53026, CVE-2026-53027, CVE-2026-53028, CVE-2026-53029,
CVE-2026-53030, CVE-2026-53031, CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033,
CVE-2026-53034, CVE-2026-53035, CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037,
CVE-2026-53038, CVE-2026-53039, CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041,
CVE-2026-53042, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53044, CVE-2026-53045,
CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049,
CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53051, CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53053,
CVE-2026-53054, CVE-2026-53055, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53057,
CVE-2026-53058, CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061,
CVE-2026-53062, CVE-2026-53063, CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065,
CVE-2026-53066, CVE-2026-53067, CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069,
CVE-2026-53070, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072, CVE-2026-53073,
CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076, CVE-2026-53077,
CVE-2026-53078, CVE-2026-53079, CVE-2026-53080, CVE-2026-53081,
CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084, CVE-2026-53085,
CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53087, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53089,
CVE-2026-53090, CVE-2026-53091, CVE-2026-53092, CVE-2026-53093,
CVE-2026-53094, CVE-2026-53095, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097,
CVE-2026-53098, CVE-2026-53099, CVE-2026-53100, CVE-2026-53101,
CVE-2026-53102, CVE-2026-53103, CVE-2026-53104, CVE-2026-53105,
CVE-2026-53106, CVE-2026-53107, CVE-2026-53108, CVE-2026-53109,
CVE-2026-53110, CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53113,
CVE-2026-53114, CVE-2026-53115, CVE-2026-53116, CVE-2026-53117,
CVE-2026-53118, CVE-2026-53119, CVE-2026-53120, CVE-2026-53121,
CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53124, CVE-2026-53125,
CVE-2026-53126, CVE-2026-53127, CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53129,
CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53174, CVE-2026-53277, CVE-2026-53278,
CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53280, CVE-2026-53281, CVE-2026-53282,
CVE-2026-53283, CVE-2026-53284, CVE-2026-53285, CVE-2026-53286,
CVE-2026-53287, CVE-2026-53288, CVE-2026-53289, CVE-2026-53290,
CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53292, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294,
CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53297, CVE-2026-53298,
CVE-2026-53299, CVE-2026-53300, CVE-2026-53301, CVE-2026-53302,
CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304, CVE-2026-53305, CVE-2026-53306,
CVE-2026-53307, CVE-2026-53308, CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53310,
CVE-2026-53311, CVE-2026-53312, CVE-2026-53313, CVE-2026-53314,
CVE-2026-53315, CVE-2026-53316, CVE-2026-53317, CVE-2026-53318,
CVE-2026-53319, CVE-2026-53320, CVE-2026-53321, CVE-2026-53322,
CVE-2026-53323, CVE-2026-53324, CVE-2026-53357, CVE-2026-53358,
CVE-2026-53360, CVE-2026-53364, CVE-2026-53365)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[USN-8567-1: Linux kernel vulnerabilities]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shar...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681567/unix-server/usn-8567-1-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681567/unix-server/usn-8567-1-linux-kernel-vulnerabilities/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:46:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Unix Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)

It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)

Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Character device driver;
  - Clock framework and drivers;
  - Data acquisition framework and drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - CPU frequency scaling framework;
  - Hardware crypto device drivers;
  - CXL (Compute Express Link) drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - EDAC drivers;
  - EFI core;
  - GPU drivers;
  - Greybus drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Hardware monitoring drivers;
  - I2C subsystem;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - InfiniBand drivers;
  - Input Device (Miscellaneous) drivers;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Mailbox framework;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - Media drivers;
  - MediaTek SMI driver;
  - NVIDIA Tegra memory controller driver;
  - Fastrpc Driver;
  - IBM Advanced System Management driver;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - MTD block device drivers;
  - Network drivers;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - Microsoft Azure Network Adapter (MANA) driver;
  - STMicroelectronics network drivers;
  - Ethernet team driver;
  - MediaTek network drivers;
  - Near Field Communication (NFC) drivers;
  - NTB driver;
  - NVDIMM (Non-Volatile Memory Device) drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - Device tree and open firmware driver;
  - PCI subsystem;
  - Pin controllers subsystem;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - Broadcom BCM2835 power domain driver;
  - Generic PM domains;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - Remote Processor subsystem;
  - S/390 drivers;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - Freescale SoC drivers;
  - Microchip PolarFire SoC system controller driver;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - Media staging drivers;
  - Realtek RTL8723BS SDIO drivers;
  - SM750 framebuffer staging driver;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - Thermal drivers;
  - TTY drivers;
  - UFS subsystem;
  - Cadence USB3 driver;
  - USB Device Class drivers;
  - ULPI bus;
  - USB core drivers;
  - DesignWare USB2 driver;
  - USB Gadget drivers;
  - USB Host Controller drivers;
  - Mustek MDC800 USB digital camera driver;
  - USB YUREX driver;
  - Renesas USBHS Controller drivers;
  - USB Type-C Connector System Software Interface driver;
  - VFIO drivers;
  - Framebuffer layer;
  - TSM TDX Guest driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - File systems infrastructure;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - Ceph distributed file system;
  - EROFS file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - F2FS file system;
  - FUSE (File system in Userspace);
  - GFS2 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Journaling layer for block devices (JBD2);
  - Network file systems library;
  - Network file system (NFS) server daemon;
  - NILFS2 file system;
  - File system notification infrastructure;
  - NTFS3 file system;
  - OCFS2 file system;
  - Diskquota system;
  - SMB network file system;
  - SquashFS file system;
  - Tracing file system;
  - UDF file system;
  - XFS file system;
  - Kernel CPU control infrastructure;
  - QorIQ DPAA2 FSL-MC bus driver;
  - Memory Management;
  - Integrity Measurement Architecture(IMA) framework;
  - KVM subsystem;
  - Memory management;
  - Networking core;
  - padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - PPP protocol drivers and compressors;
  - Linux Security Modules (LSM) Framework;
  - Tracing infrastructure;
  - Network traffic control;
  - Distributed Switch Architecture;
  - IPv4 networking;
  - IP tunnels definitions;
  - MAC80211 subsystem;
  - Netfilter;
  - User-space API (UAPI);
  - io_uring subsystem;
  - Audit subsystem;
  - BPF subsystem;
  - Control group (cgroup);
  - Perf events;
  - Kernel exit() syscall;
  - Kernel fork() syscall;
  - Kernel futex primitives;
  - KProbes tracing;
  - Locking primitives;
  - Kernel module support;
  - Padata parallel execution mechanism;
  - Cryptographic library;
  - Heterogeneous memory management;
  - KASAN memory debugging framework;
  - Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) subsystem;
  - B.A.T.M.A.N. meshing protocol;
  - Bluetooth subsystem;
  - Ethernet bridge;
  - CAIF protocol;
  - CAN network layer;
  - Ceph Core library;
  - IPv6 networking;
  - XFRM subsystem;
  - L2TP protocol;
  - Management Component Transport Protocol (MCTP);
  - Multipath TCP;
  - NCSI (Network Controller Sideband Interface) driver;
  - NFC subsystem;
  - Open vSwitch;
  - Packet sockets;
  - Qualcomm IPC Router (QRTR);
  - RDS protocol;
  - RF switch subsystem;
  - Rose network layer;
  - RxRPC session sockets;
  - SCTP protocol;
  - SMC sockets;
  - Stream parser;
  - Sun RPC protocol;
  - TIPC protocol;
  - TLS protocol;
  - Unix domain sockets;
  - VMware vSockets driver;
  - Wireless networking;
  - X.25 network layer;
  - eXpress Data Path;
  - Landlock security;
  - ALSA framework;
  - Generic PCM loopback sound driver;
  - FireWire sound drivers;
  - HD-audio driver;
  - Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi driver;
  - AMD SoC Alsa drivers;
  - QCOM ASoC drivers;
  - Samsung ASoC drivers;
  - SoC audio core drivers;
  - SOF drivers;
  - STI ASoC drivers;
  - USB sound devices;
  - Objtool;
(CVE-2025-21709, CVE-2025-22116, CVE-2025-38426, CVE-2025-39764,
CVE-2025-40135, CVE-2025-40150, CVE-2025-68175, CVE-2025-68239,
CVE-2025-68334, CVE-2025-68736, CVE-2025-71152, CVE-2025-71161,
CVE-2025-71203, CVE-2025-71221, CVE-2025-71269, CVE-2025-71287,
CVE-2025-71288, CVE-2026-22981, CVE-2026-22985, CVE-2026-22993,
CVE-2026-23004, CVE-2026-23066, CVE-2026-23104, CVE-2026-23118,
CVE-2026-23138, CVE-2026-23154, CVE-2026-23157, CVE-2026-23171,
CVE-2026-23207, CVE-2026-23226, CVE-2026-23227, CVE-2026-23244,
CVE-2026-23245, CVE-2026-23246, CVE-2026-23253, CVE-2026-23255,
CVE-2026-23270, CVE-2026-23271, CVE-2026-23276, CVE-2026-23277,
CVE-2026-23279, CVE-2026-23281, CVE-2026-23284, CVE-2026-23285,
CVE-2026-23286, CVE-2026-23287, CVE-2026-23289, CVE-2026-23290,
CVE-2026-23291, CVE-2026-23292, CVE-2026-23293, CVE-2026-23296,
CVE-2026-23298, CVE-2026-23300, CVE-2026-23302, CVE-2026-23303,
CVE-2026-23304, CVE-2026-23306, CVE-2026-23307, CVE-2026-23308,
CVE-2026-23310, CVE-2026-23312, CVE-2026-23313, CVE-2026-23315,
CVE-2026-23317, CVE-2026-23318, CVE-2026-23319, CVE-2026-23321,
CVE-2026-23324, CVE-2026-23325, CVE-2026-23330, CVE-2026-23334,
CVE-2026-23335, CVE-2026-23336, CVE-2026-23339, CVE-2026-23340,
CVE-2026-23343, CVE-2026-23347, CVE-2026-23352, CVE-2026-23356,
CVE-2026-23357, CVE-2026-23359, CVE-2026-23360, CVE-2026-23361,
CVE-2026-23362, CVE-2026-23363, CVE-2026-23364, CVE-2026-23365,
CVE-2026-23367, CVE-2026-23368, CVE-2026-23369, CVE-2026-23370,
CVE-2026-23372, CVE-2026-23374, CVE-2026-23375, CVE-2026-23378,
CVE-2026-23379, CVE-2026-23381, CVE-2026-23382, CVE-2026-23383,
CVE-2026-23386, CVE-2026-23387, CVE-2026-23388, CVE-2026-23389,
CVE-2026-23391, CVE-2026-23395, CVE-2026-23396, CVE-2026-23397,
CVE-2026-23398, CVE-2026-23399, CVE-2026-23401, CVE-2026-23412,
CVE-2026-23413, CVE-2026-23414, CVE-2026-23418, CVE-2026-23419,
CVE-2026-23420, CVE-2026-23426, CVE-2026-23434, CVE-2026-23438,
CVE-2026-23439, CVE-2026-23440, CVE-2026-23441, CVE-2026-23442,
CVE-2026-23444, CVE-2026-23446, CVE-2026-23447, CVE-2026-23448,
CVE-2026-23449, CVE-2026-23452, CVE-2026-23454, CVE-2026-23456,
CVE-2026-23457, CVE-2026-23458, CVE-2026-23460, CVE-2026-23461,
CVE-2026-23462, CVE-2026-23463, CVE-2026-23464, CVE-2026-23465,
CVE-2026-23468, CVE-2026-23470, CVE-2026-23474, CVE-2026-23475,
CVE-2026-31389, CVE-2026-31391, CVE-2026-31392, CVE-2026-31393,
CVE-2026-31394, CVE-2026-31396, CVE-2026-31399, CVE-2026-31400,
CVE-2026-31403, CVE-2026-31405, CVE-2026-31407, CVE-2026-31408,
CVE-2026-31409, CVE-2026-31412, CVE-2026-31413, CVE-2026-31414,
CVE-2026-31415, CVE-2026-31416, CVE-2026-31417, CVE-2026-31421,
CVE-2026-31422, CVE-2026-31423, CVE-2026-31424, CVE-2026-31425,
CVE-2026-31426, CVE-2026-31427, CVE-2026-31428, CVE-2026-31429,
CVE-2026-31430, CVE-2026-31432, CVE-2026-31433, CVE-2026-31434,
CVE-2026-31438, CVE-2026-31439, CVE-2026-31440, CVE-2026-31441,
CVE-2026-31446, CVE-2026-31447, CVE-2026-31449, CVE-2026-31450,
CVE-2026-31451, CVE-2026-31452, CVE-2026-31453, CVE-2026-31454,
CVE-2026-31455, CVE-2026-31458, CVE-2026-31464, CVE-2026-31466,
CVE-2026-31467, CVE-2026-31469, CVE-2026-31470, CVE-2026-31473,
CVE-2026-31474, CVE-2026-31476, CVE-2026-31477, CVE-2026-31480,
CVE-2026-31482, CVE-2026-31483, CVE-2026-31485, CVE-2026-31487,
CVE-2026-31488, CVE-2026-31489, CVE-2026-31492, CVE-2026-31494,
CVE-2026-31495, CVE-2026-31496, CVE-2026-31497, CVE-2026-31498,
CVE-2026-31499, CVE-2026-31500, CVE-2026-31502, CVE-2026-31503,
CVE-2026-31505, CVE-2026-31506, CVE-2026-31507, CVE-2026-31508,
CVE-2026-31509, CVE-2026-31510, CVE-2026-31511, CVE-2026-31512,
CVE-2026-31515, CVE-2026-31516, CVE-2026-31518, CVE-2026-31519,
CVE-2026-31520, CVE-2026-31521, CVE-2026-31522, CVE-2026-31523,
CVE-2026-31524, CVE-2026-31525, CVE-2026-31527, CVE-2026-31528,
CVE-2026-31530, CVE-2026-31532, CVE-2026-31540, CVE-2026-31542,
CVE-2026-31545, CVE-2026-31546, CVE-2026-31548, CVE-2026-31549,
CVE-2026-31550, CVE-2026-31551, CVE-2026-31552, CVE-2026-31554,
CVE-2026-31555, CVE-2026-31556, CVE-2026-31557, CVE-2026-31563,
CVE-2026-31565, CVE-2026-31566, CVE-2026-31570, CVE-2026-31575,
CVE-2026-31576, CVE-2026-31577, CVE-2026-31578, CVE-2026-31580,
CVE-2026-31581, CVE-2026-31582, CVE-2026-31583, CVE-2026-31584,
CVE-2026-31585, CVE-2026-31586, CVE-2026-31587, CVE-2026-31588,
CVE-2026-31590, CVE-2026-31594, CVE-2026-31595, CVE-2026-31596,
CVE-2026-31597, CVE-2026-31598, CVE-2026-31599, CVE-2026-31602,
CVE-2026-31603, CVE-2026-31604, CVE-2026-31605, CVE-2026-31606,
CVE-2026-31610, CVE-2026-31611, CVE-2026-31612, CVE-2026-31613,
CVE-2026-31615, CVE-2026-31616, CVE-2026-31617, CVE-2026-31618,
CVE-2026-31619, CVE-2026-31622, CVE-2026-31623, CVE-2026-31624,
CVE-2026-31625, CVE-2026-31626, CVE-2026-31627, CVE-2026-31628,
CVE-2026-31629, CVE-2026-31634, CVE-2026-31638, CVE-2026-31639,
CVE-2026-31642, CVE-2026-31645, CVE-2026-31646, CVE-2026-31648,
CVE-2026-31651, CVE-2026-31655, CVE-2026-31656, CVE-2026-31658,
CVE-2026-31660, CVE-2026-31661, CVE-2026-31662, CVE-2026-31664,
CVE-2026-31665, CVE-2026-31667, CVE-2026-31670, CVE-2026-31671,
CVE-2026-31672, CVE-2026-31673, CVE-2026-31674, CVE-2026-31675,
CVE-2026-31677, CVE-2026-31678, CVE-2026-31679, CVE-2026-31680,
CVE-2026-31681, CVE-2026-31683, CVE-2026-31684, CVE-2026-31686,
CVE-2026-31689, CVE-2026-31694, CVE-2026-31695, CVE-2026-31696,
CVE-2026-31697, CVE-2026-31698, CVE-2026-31699, CVE-2026-31700,
CVE-2026-31701, CVE-2026-31702, CVE-2026-31704, CVE-2026-31705,
CVE-2026-31706, CVE-2026-31707, CVE-2026-31708, CVE-2026-31709,
CVE-2026-31711, CVE-2026-31712, CVE-2026-31714, CVE-2026-31715,
CVE-2026-31716, CVE-2026-31720, CVE-2026-31721, CVE-2026-31722,
CVE-2026-31723, CVE-2026-31724, CVE-2026-31725, CVE-2026-31726,
CVE-2026-31728, CVE-2026-31729, CVE-2026-31730, CVE-2026-31731,
CVE-2026-31737, CVE-2026-31738, CVE-2026-31740, CVE-2026-31741,
CVE-2026-31747, CVE-2026-31748, CVE-2026-31749, CVE-2026-31751,
CVE-2026-31752, CVE-2026-31754, CVE-2026-31755, CVE-2026-31756,
CVE-2026-31758, CVE-2026-31759, CVE-2026-31761, CVE-2026-31762,
CVE-2026-31763, CVE-2026-31767, CVE-2026-31768, CVE-2026-31770,
CVE-2026-31772, CVE-2026-31773, CVE-2026-31778, CVE-2026-31779,
CVE-2026-31780, CVE-2026-31781, CVE-2026-31788, CVE-2026-43007,
CVE-2026-43012, CVE-2026-43013, CVE-2026-43014, CVE-2026-43015,
CVE-2026-43016, CVE-2026-43017, CVE-2026-43018, CVE-2026-43019,
CVE-2026-43020, CVE-2026-43023, CVE-2026-43024, CVE-2026-43025,
CVE-2026-43026, CVE-2026-43027, CVE-2026-43028, CVE-2026-43030,
CVE-2026-43032, CVE-2026-43035, CVE-2026-43036, CVE-2026-43040,
CVE-2026-43041, CVE-2026-43043, CVE-2026-43044, CVE-2026-43046,
CVE-2026-43047, CVE-2026-43049, CVE-2026-43050, CVE-2026-43051,
CVE-2026-43052, CVE-2026-43054, CVE-2026-43056, CVE-2026-43057,
CVE-2026-43058, CVE-2026-43059, CVE-2026-43060, CVE-2026-43061,
CVE-2026-43062, CVE-2026-43064, CVE-2026-43065, CVE-2026-43066,
CVE-2026-43068, CVE-2026-43069, CVE-2026-43072, CVE-2026-43073,
CVE-2026-43074, CVE-2026-43075, CVE-2026-43076, CVE-2026-43079,
CVE-2026-43080, CVE-2026-43081, CVE-2026-43082, CVE-2026-43084,
CVE-2026-43085, CVE-2026-43086, CVE-2026-43088, CVE-2026-43089,
CVE-2026-43091, CVE-2026-43092, CVE-2026-43093, CVE-2026-43094,
CVE-2026-43098, CVE-2026-43099, CVE-2026-43103, CVE-2026-43104,
CVE-2026-43105, CVE-2026-43107, CVE-2026-43109, CVE-2026-43110,
CVE-2026-43111, CVE-2026-43112, CVE-2026-43113, CVE-2026-43119,
CVE-2026-43120, CVE-2026-43129, CVE-2026-43162, CVE-2026-43245,
CVE-2026-43252, CVE-2026-43265, CVE-2026-43281, CVE-2026-43324,
CVE-2026-43327, CVE-2026-43328, CVE-2026-43329, CVE-2026-43330,
CVE-2026-43332, CVE-2026-43333, CVE-2026-43334, CVE-2026-43336,
CVE-2026-43338, CVE-2026-43339, CVE-2026-43340, CVE-2026-43342,
CVE-2026-43343, CVE-2026-43345, CVE-2026-43350, CVE-2026-43355,
CVE-2026-43357, CVE-2026-43359, CVE-2026-43360, CVE-2026-43361,
CVE-2026-43362, CVE-2026-43363, CVE-2026-43365, CVE-2026-43366,
CVE-2026-43368, CVE-2026-43370, CVE-2026-43371, CVE-2026-43372,
CVE-2026-43373, CVE-2026-43377, CVE-2026-43380, CVE-2026-43381,
CVE-2026-43382, CVE-2026-43386, CVE-2026-43387, CVE-2026-43395,
CVE-2026-43397, CVE-2026-43405, CVE-2026-43408, CVE-2026-43409,
CVE-2026-43411, CVE-2026-43412, CVE-2026-43413, CVE-2026-43415,
CVE-2026-43419, CVE-2026-43420, CVE-2026-43421, CVE-2026-43424,
CVE-2026-43425, CVE-2026-43426, CVE-2026-43427, CVE-2026-43428,
CVE-2026-43429, CVE-2026-43430, CVE-2026-43432, CVE-2026-43436,
CVE-2026-43437, CVE-2026-43439, CVE-2026-43441, CVE-2026-43445,
CVE-2026-43448, CVE-2026-43449, CVE-2026-43450, CVE-2026-43451,
CVE-2026-43452, CVE-2026-43453, CVE-2026-43455, CVE-2026-43456,
CVE-2026-43457, CVE-2026-43458, CVE-2026-43459, CVE-2026-43466,
CVE-2026-43467, CVE-2026-43468, CVE-2026-43469, CVE-2026-43471,
CVE-2026-43472, CVE-2026-43473, CVE-2026-43475, CVE-2026-43476,
CVE-2026-43480, CVE-2026-43483, CVE-2026-43484, CVE-2026-43488,
CVE-2026-43490, CVE-2026-43491, CVE-2026-43492, CVE-2026-43495,
CVE-2026-43496, CVE-2026-43497, CVE-2026-43499, CVE-2026-43502,
CVE-2026-45834, CVE-2026-45835, CVE-2026-45836, CVE-2026-45838,
CVE-2026-45839, CVE-2026-45840, CVE-2026-45841, CVE-2026-45842,
CVE-2026-45843, CVE-2026-45844, CVE-2026-45845, CVE-2026-45846,
CVE-2026-45855, CVE-2026-45858, CVE-2026-45899, CVE-2026-45911,
CVE-2026-45920, CVE-2026-45924, CVE-2026-45942, CVE-2026-45943,
CVE-2026-45956, CVE-2026-45958, CVE-2026-45985, CVE-2026-45986,
CVE-2026-45987, CVE-2026-45989, CVE-2026-45991, CVE-2026-45994,
CVE-2026-45996, CVE-2026-45997, CVE-2026-45999, CVE-2026-46002,
CVE-2026-46003, CVE-2026-46004, CVE-2026-46005, CVE-2026-46006,
CVE-2026-46007, CVE-2026-46009, CVE-2026-46011, CVE-2026-46012,
CVE-2026-46015, CVE-2026-46016, CVE-2026-46018, CVE-2026-46019,
CVE-2026-46021, CVE-2026-46022, CVE-2026-46023, CVE-2026-46024,
CVE-2026-46026, CVE-2026-46027, CVE-2026-46031, CVE-2026-46033,
CVE-2026-46037, CVE-2026-46038, CVE-2026-46040, CVE-2026-46041,
CVE-2026-46044, CVE-2026-46046, CVE-2026-46047, CVE-2026-46049,
CVE-2026-46050, CVE-2026-46051, CVE-2026-46052, CVE-2026-46053,
CVE-2026-46056, CVE-2026-46058, CVE-2026-46061, CVE-2026-46062,
CVE-2026-46063, CVE-2026-46064, CVE-2026-46065, CVE-2026-46068,
CVE-2026-46069, CVE-2026-46070, CVE-2026-46072, CVE-2026-46073,
CVE-2026-46075, CVE-2026-46076, CVE-2026-46077, CVE-2026-46078,
CVE-2026-46079, CVE-2026-46080, CVE-2026-46082, CVE-2026-46083,
CVE-2026-46084, CVE-2026-46086, CVE-2026-46088, CVE-2026-46089,
CVE-2026-46090, CVE-2026-46091, CVE-2026-46092, CVE-2026-46094,
CVE-2026-46098, CVE-2026-46099, CVE-2026-46101, CVE-2026-46102,
CVE-2026-46103, CVE-2026-46106, CVE-2026-46107, CVE-2026-46108,
CVE-2026-46110, CVE-2026-46111, CVE-2026-46112, CVE-2026-46113,
CVE-2026-46114, CVE-2026-46116, CVE-2026-46117, CVE-2026-46120,
CVE-2026-46121, CVE-2026-46122, CVE-2026-46123, CVE-2026-46124,
CVE-2026-46125, CVE-2026-46126, CVE-2026-46127, CVE-2026-46128,
CVE-2026-46129, CVE-2026-46131, CVE-2026-46132, CVE-2026-46133,
CVE-2026-46136, CVE-2026-46137, CVE-2026-46138, CVE-2026-46139,
CVE-2026-46142, CVE-2026-46143, CVE-2026-46144, CVE-2026-46145,
CVE-2026-46146, CVE-2026-46149, CVE-2026-46150, CVE-2026-46151,
CVE-2026-46152, CVE-2026-46157, CVE-2026-46159, CVE-2026-46160,
CVE-2026-46161, CVE-2026-46163, CVE-2026-46164, CVE-2026-46167,
CVE-2026-46168, CVE-2026-46169, CVE-2026-46172, CVE-2026-46173,
CVE-2026-46174, CVE-2026-46176, CVE-2026-46177, CVE-2026-46178,
CVE-2026-46179, CVE-2026-46180, CVE-2026-46184, CVE-2026-46186,
CVE-2026-46187, CVE-2026-46189, CVE-2026-46190, CVE-2026-46191,
CVE-2026-46193, CVE-2026-46194, CVE-2026-46196, CVE-2026-46197,
CVE-2026-46198, CVE-2026-46199, CVE-2026-46200, CVE-2026-46201,
CVE-2026-46204, CVE-2026-46205, CVE-2026-46206, CVE-2026-46207,
CVE-2026-46208, CVE-2026-46209, CVE-2026-46211, CVE-2026-46212,
CVE-2026-46214, CVE-2026-46218, CVE-2026-46219, CVE-2026-46220,
CVE-2026-46225, CVE-2026-46226, CVE-2026-46227, CVE-2026-46229,
CVE-2026-46230, CVE-2026-46231, CVE-2026-46232, CVE-2026-46233,
CVE-2026-46234, CVE-2026-46235, CVE-2026-46236, CVE-2026-46238,
CVE-2026-46241, CVE-2026-46273, CVE-2026-46274, CVE-2026-46280,
CVE-2026-46282, CVE-2026-46285, CVE-2026-46286, CVE-2026-46287,
CVE-2026-46291, CVE-2026-46292, CVE-2026-46293, CVE-2026-46294,
CVE-2026-46296, CVE-2026-46299, CVE-2026-46301, CVE-2026-46303,
CVE-2026-46304, CVE-2026-46306, CVE-2026-46307, CVE-2026-46312,
CVE-2026-46314, CVE-2026-46319, CVE-2026-52911, CVE-2026-52920,
CVE-2026-52925, CVE-2026-52933, CVE-2026-52936, CVE-2026-52951,
CVE-2026-52954, CVE-2026-52955, CVE-2026-52957, CVE-2026-52958,
CVE-2026-52961, CVE-2026-52962, CVE-2026-52963, CVE-2026-52964,
CVE-2026-52967, CVE-2026-52968, CVE-2026-52969, CVE-2026-52970,
CVE-2026-52974, CVE-2026-52975, CVE-2026-52977, CVE-2026-52981,
CVE-2026-52982, CVE-2026-52984, CVE-2026-52985, CVE-2026-52986,
CVE-2026-52989, CVE-2026-52990, CVE-2026-52992, CVE-2026-52993,
CVE-2026-52995, CVE-2026-52998, CVE-2026-52999, CVE-2026-53001,
CVE-2026-53002, CVE-2026-53003, CVE-2026-53004, CVE-2026-53006,
CVE-2026-53011, CVE-2026-53012, CVE-2026-53013, CVE-2026-53014,
CVE-2026-53015, CVE-2026-53016, CVE-2026-53021, CVE-2026-53022,
CVE-2026-53023, CVE-2026-53032, CVE-2026-53033, CVE-2026-53034,
CVE-2026-53035, CVE-2026-53036, CVE-2026-53037, CVE-2026-53039,
CVE-2026-53040, CVE-2026-53041, CVE-2026-53043, CVE-2026-53045,
CVE-2026-53046, CVE-2026-53047, CVE-2026-53048, CVE-2026-53049,
CVE-2026-53050, CVE-2026-53052, CVE-2026-53056, CVE-2026-53058,
CVE-2026-53059, CVE-2026-53060, CVE-2026-53061, CVE-2026-53062,
CVE-2026-53063, CVE-2026-53064, CVE-2026-53065, CVE-2026-53066,
CVE-2026-53068, CVE-2026-53069, CVE-2026-53071, CVE-2026-53072,
CVE-2026-53073, CVE-2026-53074, CVE-2026-53075, CVE-2026-53076,
CVE-2026-53077, CVE-2026-53082, CVE-2026-53083, CVE-2026-53084,
CVE-2026-53085, CVE-2026-53086, CVE-2026-53088, CVE-2026-53093,
CVE-2026-53094, CVE-2026-53096, CVE-2026-53097, CVE-2026-53098,
CVE-2026-53110, CVE-2026-53111, CVE-2026-53112, CVE-2026-53115,
CVE-2026-53117, CVE-2026-53122, CVE-2026-53123, CVE-2026-53126,
CVE-2026-53128, CVE-2026-53130, CVE-2026-53279, CVE-2026-53287,
CVE-2026-53289, CVE-2026-53291, CVE-2026-53293, CVE-2026-53294,
CVE-2026-53295, CVE-2026-53296, CVE-2026-53303, CVE-2026-53304,
CVE-2026-53306, CVE-2026-53309, CVE-2026-53314, CVE-2026-53320)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Wie die EU europäische "Unabhängigkeit" vortäuschen will]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: The Morpheus - Bewertung: 59x - Views:615 Der Cloud and AI Development Act: Eine tolle Chance sich wirklich als unabhängig zu vermarkten - obwohl man es vielleicht gar nicht ist.

[Werbung] 
Hier geht's zu unserem Partner, Hostinger: https://www.hostg.xyz/SHJLp
10% Rabatt Code: Morpheus10...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3681556/video/wie-die-eu-europaeische-unabhaengigkeit-vortaeuschen-will/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3681556/video/wie-die-eu-europaeische-unabhaengigkeit-vortaeuschen-will/</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:21:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: The Morpheus - Bewertung: 59x - Views:615 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/QL9puC7f8uE?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Der Cloud and AI Development Act: Eine tolle Chance sich wirklich als unabhängig zu vermarkten - obwohl man es vielleicht gar nicht ist.<br />
<br />
[Werbung] <br />
Hier geht's zu unserem Partner, Hostinger: https://www.hostg.xyz/SHJLp<br />
10% Rabatt Code: Morpheus10<br />
<br />
MorphReader im PlayStore: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.themorpheus.morph_reader_app&hl=de<br />
<br />
MorphReader im App Store: https://apps.apple.com/de/app/morphreader/id6741467699?platform=iphone<br />
<br />
RSS-Feed: https://www.patreon.com/collection/880029?view=expanded<br />
<br />
Bootstrap Academy: https://bootstrap.academy/<br />
https://github.com/Bootstrap-Academy/<br />
<br />
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/themorpheustuts/<br />
<br />
Quellen:<br />
https://kdrive.infomaniak.com/app/share/1794086/4326a496-b513-4b19-bf9c-14aed3b92b66<br />
<br />
Meine anderen Kanäle und Projekte: the-morpheus.de/<br />
<br />
_Selbst *kostenlos Informatik lernen* auf meiner Website:_ https://bootstrap.academy/<br />
<br />
_Discord:_<br />
https://the-morpheus.de/discord.html<br />
<br />
_Unterstützt mich - Danke!:_<br />
https://www.patreon.com/user?u=5322110<br />
https://www.paypal.me/TheMorpheus<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- Generated in 0,83ms -->