<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/rss-style.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[Team IT Security - 📰 Alle Kategorien]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[https://tsecurity.de/export/rss/alle-kategorien.xml?q=deal+with+problem+that%2F]]></link>
<description><![CDATA[Das Gesamte Cyber Threat Intelligence Feed-Archiv von TSecurity.de. Alle Nachrichten, Sicherheitsmeldungen, Videos, Downloads und Analysen in einer zentralen Übersicht.]]></description>
<language>de-DE</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 23:18:49 +0200</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 23:18:49 +0200</pubDate>
<ttl>15</ttl>
<copyright>2026 Team IT Security</copyright>
<managingEditor>lakandor@tsecurity.de (Horus Sirius)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>lakandor@tsecurity.de (Horus Sirius)</webMaster>
<category>IT Security</category>
<category>Cybersecurity</category>
<category>Nachrichten</category>
<generator>Team IT Security RSS Generator v2.0</generator>

<atom:link href="https://tsecurity.de/export/rss/it-security.xml?q=deal+with+problem+that%2F" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-17459 | perwendel spark up to 2.9.4 SparkJava ExternalResourceHandler.jav staticFiles.externalLocation symlink (Issue 1296 / EUVD-2026-49054)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability classified as critical was found in perwendel spark up to 2.9.4. This vulnerability affects the function staticFiles.externalLocation of the file src/main/java/spark/resource/ExternalResourceHandler.jav of the component SparkJava. Executing a manipulation can lead to symlink follo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695626/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-17459-perwendel-spark-up-to-294-sparkjava-externalresourcehandlerjav-staticfilesexternallocation-symlink-issue-1296-euvd-2026-49054/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695626/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-17459-perwendel-spark-up-to-294-sparkjava-externalresourcehandlerjav-staticfilesexternallocation-symlink-issue-1296-euvd-2026-49054/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 14:29:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">critical</a> was found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/perwendel:spark">perwendel spark up to 2.9.4</a>. This vulnerability affects the function <code>staticFiles.externalLocation</code> of the file <em>src/main/java/spark/resource/ExternalResourceHandler.jav</em> of the component <em>SparkJava</em>. Executing a manipulation can lead to symlink following.

This vulnerability is registered as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-17459">CVE-2026-17459</a>. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Furthermore, an exploit is available.

The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-17458 | mf-yang openclaw-cn up to 0.2.1 Browser Control HTTP API agent.act.ts clickViaPlaywright server-side request forgery (Issue 562 / EUVD-2026-49053)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in mf-yang openclaw-cn up to 0.2.1. This affects the function clickViaPlaywright of the file src/browser/routes/agent.act.ts of the component Browser Control HTTP API. Performing a manipulation results in server-side request forgery.

This vul...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695625/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-17458-mf-yang-openclaw-cn-up-to-021-browser-control-http-api-agentactts-clickviaplaywright-server-side-request-forgery-issue-562-euvd-2026-49053/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695625/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-17458-mf-yang-openclaw-cn-up-to-021-browser-control-http-api-agentactts-clickviaplaywright-server-side-request-forgery-issue-562-euvd-2026-49053/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 14:29:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">critical</a> has been found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/mf-yang:openclaw-cn">mf-yang openclaw-cn up to 0.2.1</a>. This affects the function <code>clickViaPlaywright</code> of the file <em>src/browser/routes/agent.act.ts</em> of the component <em>Browser Control HTTP API</em>. Performing a manipulation results in server-side request forgery.

This vulnerability is cataloged as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-17458">CVE-2026-17458</a>. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.

The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[A Promising Process For Nuclear Fuel Re-use and Disposal?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A Canadian lab has run a chemical process on real spent nuclear fuel "and pulled out 90% of the long-lived danger in 24 hours, the part that forces a burial site to last 100,000 years," notes the blog Autonocio, "with the leftovers meant to fuel a reactor."


The standard plan for spent nuclear f...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695586/it-security-nachrichten/a-promising-process-for-nuclear-fuel-re-use-and-disposal/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695586/it-security-nachrichten/a-promising-process-for-nuclear-fuel-re-use-and-disposal/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 13:48:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A Canadian lab has run a chemical process on real spent nuclear fuel "and pulled out 90% of the long-lived danger in 24 hours, the part that forces a burial site to last 100,000 years," notes the blog Autonocio, "with the leftovers meant to fuel a reactor."


The standard plan for spent nuclear fuel is to wait it out. You pull the used bundles from a reactor, sit them in a pool of water for seven to ten years while the heat and radiation come down, seal them in concrete casks, and look for somewhere deep and geologically dull to leave them for the next hundred thousand years. Canada has been hunting for that burial site since the 1980s and still doesn't have one in the ground. 

A company in Saint John, New Brunswick thinks most of what makes that waste dangerous never needed to go in the ground at all. Moltex Energy Canada says a chemical process it calls WATSS can strip 90% of the long-lived material out of used Canada Deuterium Uranium [CANDU] fuel in 24 hours, and that the concentrated leftovers become fuel for a reactor it wants to build on the same site. The recovery step isn't a slide in a pitch deck anymore. In 2025, World Nuclear News reported that Canadian Nuclear Laboratories ran the process on real used fuel from a commercial Canadian reactor and confirmed the 90% figure. 

None of it is generating power yet. What exists is a validated chemical step and a reactor design waiting in line at a regulator. The rest is a 2030s problem. 

"The chemistry has a lab result behind it. The reactor does not exist..." the article points out. "Moltex is aiming to have its first WATSS and SSR-W units running at Point Lepreau by the early-to-mid 2030s... Not everyone buys the pitch. Critics have argued the reprocessing creates its own stream of byproducts, that the economics are unproven, and that a single site's stockpile is finite." 

But Moltex "isn't alone in trying to burn nuclear waste instead of bury it," the article notes, with Switzerland and Denmark "chasing the same goal a different way."


 Switzerland's Transmutex drives a subcritical reactor with a particle accelerator, feeding it spent fuel alongside thorium... Denmark's Copenhagen Atomics is building a thorium molten-salt reactor that fits inside a shipping container and runs on the leftovers from conventional plants. 


Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader kwelch007 for sharing the article.
<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=A+Promising+Process+For+Nuclear+Fuel+Re-use+and+Disposal%3F%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F26%2F0456203%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F26%2F0456203%2Fa-promising-process-for-nuclear-fuel-re-use-and-disposal%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/07/26/0456203/a-promising-process-for-nuclear-fuel-re-use-and-disposal?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Auftragsfertigung und HBM4: Samsung schließt 200-Milliarden-Dollar-Deal mit Broadcom]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Um den Rückstand zu TSMC aufzuholen, sichert sich Samsung Electronics die Zusammenarbeit mit Broadcom. (Samsung, Prozessor)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695569/it-nachrichten/auftragsfertigung-und-hbm4-samsung-schliesst-200-milliarden-dollar-deal-mit-broadcom/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695569/it-nachrichten/auftragsfertigung-und-hbm4-samsung-schliesst-200-milliarden-dollar-deal-mit-broadcom/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 13:45:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Um den Rückstand zu TSMC aufzuholen, sichert sich Samsung Electronics die Zusammenarbeit mit Broadcom. (<a href="https://www.golem.de/specials/samsung/">Samsung</a>, <a href="https://www.golem.de/specials/cpu/">Prozessor</a>) <img src="https://cpx.golem.de/cpx.php?class=17&amp;aid=211290&amp;page=1&amp;ts=1785065581" alt="" width="1" height="1">]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-17457 | mf-yang openclaw-cn up to 0.2.1 Scheme navigation-guard.ts assertBrowserNavigationAllowed url information disclosure (Issue 561 / EUVD-2026-49052)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability described as problematic has been identified in mf-yang openclaw-cn up to 0.2.1. Affected by this issue is the function assertBrowserNavigationAllowed of the file src/browser/navigation-guard.ts of the component Scheme Handler. Such manipulation of the argument url leads to inform...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695558/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-17457-mf-yang-openclaw-cn-up-to-021-scheme-navigation-guardts-assertbrowsernavigationallowed-url-information-disclosure-issue-561-euvd-2026-49052/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695558/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-17457-mf-yang-openclaw-cn-up-to-021-scheme-navigation-guardts-assertbrowsernavigationallowed-url-information-disclosure-issue-561-euvd-2026-49052/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 13:38:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability described as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">problematic</a> has been identified in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/mf-yang:openclaw-cn">mf-yang openclaw-cn up to 0.2.1</a>. Affected by this issue is the function <code>assertBrowserNavigationAllowed</code> of the file <em>src/browser/navigation-guard.ts</em> of the component <em>Scheme Handler</em>. Such manipulation of the argument <em>url</em> leads to information disclosure.

This vulnerability is listed as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-17457">CVE-2026-17457</a>. The attack may be performed from remote. In addition, an exploit is available.

The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Von Flugtickets bis Steuern: KI-Modell entdeckt bekannte und neue Schlupflöcher - t3n]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[... hacking“. Anzeige. Anzeige. Bisher ist das vor allem als Problem diskutiert worden, weil es dazu führen kann, dass Menschen die Kontrolle über die ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695367/hacking/von-flugtickets-bis-steuern-ki-modell-entdeckt-bekannte-und-neue-schlupfloecher-t3n/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695367/hacking/von-flugtickets-bis-steuern-ki-modell-entdeckt-bekannte-und-neue-schlupfloecher-t3n/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 10:35:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[... <b>hacking</b>“. Anzeige. Anzeige. Bisher ist das vor allem als Problem diskutiert worden, weil es dazu führen kann, dass Menschen die Kontrolle über die ...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nur noch heute: Günstige Weekend-Deals bei Media Markt und Saturn]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Sonntag ist Schnäppchentag bei Media Markt und Saturn. Denn die beliebten Weekend-Deals der Händler sind nur noch heute gültig. Unser Überblick zeigt die interessantesten Angebote aus den Online-Shops, die oft sogar zum Bestpreis verkauft werden.			(Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695347/it-security-nachrichten/nur-noch-heute-guenstige-weekend-deals-bei-media-markt-und-saturn/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695347/it-security-nachrichten/nur-noch-heute-guenstige-weekend-deals-bei-media-markt-und-saturn/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 10:17:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/news,1601803.html"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="Schnäppchen, Rabattaktion, Deals, sale, Media Markt, Angebote, Saturn, Sonderangebote, prospekt, Angebot, shopping, Rabatt, Mediamarkt, Deal, Weekend Deals, Wochenendknaller, Weekend-Deals" width="1920" height="1080" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/1920/88388.jpg"></a>
			Sonntag ist Schnäppchentag bei Media Markt und Saturn. Denn die beliebten Weekend-Deals der Händler sind nur noch heute gültig. Unser Überblick zeigt die interessantesten Angebote aus den Online-Shops, die oft sogar zum Bestpreis verkauft werden.			(<a href="https://winfuture.de/news,1601803.html">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Wendung bei Warner-Übernahme: Paramount verzögert Milliarden-Deal]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Kartellklagen, horrende Vertragsstrafen und explodierende Kosten: Die geplante Übernahme von Warner Bros. Discovery durch Paramount steht vor enormen Hürden. Der Käufer muss eine teure Zwangspause bis zum Ende der Verfahren einlegen.			(Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695286/it-security-nachrichten/wendung-bei-warner-uebernahme-paramount-verzoegert-milliarden-deal/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695286/it-security-nachrichten/wendung-bei-warner-uebernahme-paramount-verzoegert-milliarden-deal/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 09:31:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/news,160203.html"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="Deutschland, paramount+, Paramount, Paramount Pictures, paramountplus, Paramount Plus, Germany, Paramount+ Deutschland" width="1920" height="1080" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/1920/55958.jpg"></a>
			Kartellklagen, horrende Vertragsstrafen und explodierende Kosten: Die geplante Übernahme von Warner Bros. Discovery durch Paramount steht vor enormen Hürden. Der Käufer muss eine teure Zwangspause bis zum Ende der Verfahren einlegen.			(<a href="https://winfuture.de/news,160203.html">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-17433 | nanocoai NanoClaw up to 2.0.64 MCP Server Approval chat-sdk-bridge.ts createChatSdkBridge.setup improper authorization (Issue 2761 / EUVD-2026-49048)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in nanocoai NanoClaw up to 2.0.64. It has been classified as critical. This impacts the function createChatSdkBridge.setup of the file src/channels/chat-sdk-bridge.ts of the component MCP Server Approval. Performing a manipulation results in improper authorization.

This...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695270/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-17433-nanocoai-nanoclaw-up-to-2064-mcp-server-approval-chat-sdk-bridgets-createchatsdkbridgesetup-improper-authorization-issue-2761-euvd-2026-49048/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695270/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-17433-nanocoai-nanoclaw-up-to-2064-mcp-server-approval-chat-sdk-bridgets-createchatsdkbridgesetup-improper-authorization-issue-2761-euvd-2026-49048/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 09:19:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/nanocoai:nanoclaw">nanocoai NanoClaw up to 2.0.64</a>. It has been classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">critical</a>. This impacts the function <code>createChatSdkBridge.setup</code> of the file <em>src/channels/chat-sdk-bridge.ts</em> of the component <em>MCP Server Approval</em>. Performing a manipulation results in improper authorization.

This vulnerability was named <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-17433">CVE-2026-17433</a>. The attack needs to be approached locally. In addition, an exploit is available.

The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[B&H launches steeper M5 MacBook Air discounts, saving you up to $200]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Both 13-inch and 15-inch MacBook Air laptops are on sale at B&H this week, with new markdowns slashing up to $200 off a variety of configurations and color options.Save up to $200 on Apple's latest MacBook Air at B&H - Image credit: AppleEach of the triple-digit MacBook Air discounts highlighted ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695211/ios-mac-os/bh-launches-steeper-m5-macbook-air-discounts-saving-you-up-to-200/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695211/ios-mac-os/bh-launches-steeper-m5-macbook-air-discounts-saving-you-up-to-200/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 08:09:01 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Both 13-inch and 15-inch MacBook Air laptops are on sale at B&amp;H this week, with new markdowns slashing up to $200 off a variety of configurations and color options.<br><br><div><img src="https://media.appleinsider.com/gallery/68363-144082-m5-macbook-air-up-to-200-off-xl.jpg" alt="Open MacBook Air laptop with abstract blue display on a red and blue gradient background, overlaid large white text reading UP TO $200 OFF"><br><span>Save up to $200 on Apple's latest MacBook Air at B&amp;H - Image credit: Apple</span></div><br>Each of the <strong><a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?q=m5%20macbook%20air&amp;filters=fct_a_filter_by%3A02_REBATE%3AREGULAR&amp;BI=1717&amp;KBID=2301&amp;SID=da-maca-mba-sale-072626&amp;DFF=d50" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">triple-digit MacBook Air discounts</a></strong> highlighted below also includes free 2-day shipping within the contiguous U.S. so you can begin using your new laptop right away.<br><br><a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?q=m5%20macbook%20air&amp;filters=fct_a_filter_by%3A02_REBATE%3AREGULAR&amp;BI=1717&amp;KBID=2301&amp;SID=da-maca-mba-sale-072626&amp;DFF=d50" rel="nofollow" class="deal-highlight">Save up to $200 on M5 MacBook Airs</a><br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/26/bh-launches-steeper-m5-macbook-air-discounts-saving-you-up-to-200?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245062?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Heiztechnik der Zukunft: Hersteller löst großes Problem bei Propan-Wärmepumpen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Propan gilt als klimafreundliches Kältemittel für Wärmepumpen. Allerdings ist das Gas auch hochentzündlich. Ein deutscher Hersteller hat nun eine Lösung vorgestellt, die den Betrieb von Propan-Wärmepumpen sicherer machen soll.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695188/it-nachrichten/heiztechnik-der-zukunft-hersteller-loest-grosses-problem-bei-propan-waermepumpen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695188/it-nachrichten/heiztechnik-der-zukunft-hersteller-loest-grosses-problem-bei-propan-waermepumpen/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 07:30:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Propan gilt als klimafreundliches Kältemittel für Wärmepumpen. Allerdings ist das Gas auch hochentzündlich. Ein deutscher Hersteller hat nun eine Lösung vorgestellt, die den Betrieb von Propan-Wärmepumpen sicherer machen soll.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Cyberangriff auf Discounter: Lidl-Kunden müssen jetzt besonders wachsam sein | swp.de]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hacker haben den Onlineshop von Lidl angegriffen und Kundendaten gestohlen. Der Angriff zeigt, warum selbst harmlose Daten zum Problem für ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695022/hacking/cyberangriff-auf-discounter-lidl-kunden-muessen-jetzt-besonders-wachsam-sein-swpde/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695022/hacking/cyberangriff-auf-discounter-lidl-kunden-muessen-jetzt-besonders-wachsam-sein-swpde/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 06:35:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>Hacker</b> haben den Onlineshop von Lidl angegriffen und Kundendaten gestohlen. Der Angriff zeigt, warum selbst harmlose Daten zum Problem für ...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[9 Anzeichen, dass Sie kurz vorm Burnout stehen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Trotz Überlastung immer funktionieren zu wollen, macht krank.Mangostar – shutterstock.com



Programmierer, so lautet ein populäres Bonmot, sind Maschinen, die Koffein in Code verwandeln. Das trifft auch auf viele andere Freiberufler zu. Der hohe Koffeinbedarf hängt damit zusammen, dass Freelance...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3695006/it-security-nachrichten/9-anzeichen-dass-sie-kurz-vorm-burnout-stehen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3695006/it-security-nachrichten/9-anzeichen-dass-sie-kurz-vorm-burnout-stehen/</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 06:33:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-23-um-16.37.39.png?w=1024" alt="Überlastung" class="wp-image-4200773" width="1024" height="571" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Trotz Überlastung immer funktionieren zu wollen, macht krank.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Mangostar – shutterstock.com</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Programmierer, so lautet ein populäres Bonmot, sind Maschinen, die Koffein in <a href="https://enablinghybridwork.cio.de/hoechste-sicherheit-fuer-behoerden-und-unternehmen" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Code</a> verwandeln. Das trifft auch auf viele andere Freiberufler zu. Der hohe Koffeinbedarf hängt damit zusammen, dass Freelancer allzu oft genau dann arbeiten, wenn ihr Gehirn sich lieber auf Stand-by schalten und zur Ruhe begeben möchte, nämlich nachts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sogar ein Buch gibt es schon, das sich mit diesem Phänomen und seinen Ursachen beschäftigt (“<a href="https://swizec.com/blog/why-programmers-work-at-night-2/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Why Programmers work at Night</a>“). Gesund ist die Nachtarbeit nicht, ebenso wenig wie das ständige Zuviel an <a href="https://enablinghybridwork.cio.de/hoechste-sicherheit-fuer-behoerden-und-unternehmen" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Arbeit</a> und ein paar andere Arbeits- und Lebensgewohnheiten, die vielen Freiberuflern zu eigen sind.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Work-Life-Balance in Schieflage geraten</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nach Ansicht von Karol Krol, einem polnischen Blogger, <a href="https://enablinghybridwork.cio.de/hoechste-sicherheit-fuer-behoerden-und-unternehmen" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Programmierer</a> und Internetunternehmer, stehen viele Freelancer kurz vor dem Burnout, ohne es zu merken. Wir sagen Freiberuflern, woran sie feststellen können, dass ihre Work-Life-Balance bedrohlich in die Schieflage geraten ist.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">1. Sie arbeiten oft bis spät in die Nacht</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Menschen sind keine Eulen und keine Fledermäuse, sondern biologisch eindeutig tagaktive Tiere. Sie sehen gut am Tag und schlecht in der Nacht. Sich einzureden, man sei nachts am produktivsten oder könne nachts “einfach am besten arbeiten”, ist in aller Regel Selbstbetrug. Wer nachts kein Ende findet, hat entweder insgesamt zu viel <a href="https://enablinghybridwork.cio.de/hoechste-sicherheit-fuer-behoerden-und-unternehmen" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Arbeit</a> oder schafft es nicht, sich tagsüber Ablenkungen zu entziehen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">2. Sie kommen morgens nicht in Gang</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Natürlich: Kalt duschen, ein schneller Kaffee und 20 Minuten nach dem Weckerklingeln am Schreibtisch sitzen – das schaffen die wenigsten. Aber wer auch zwei oder drei Stunden nach dem Aufstehen nicht in der Lage ist, die ersten Dinge auf der To-do-Liste anzugehen, hat ein Problem. Ein Grund kann – natürlich – chronische <a href="https://cio.de/article/3665643/teams-ziehen-muede-kollegen-mit.html" target="_blank">Müdigkeit</a> sein, ein anderer die Tatsache, dass Sie Ihren Arbeitstag nicht als begrenztes, achtstündiges Gebilde betrachten. Sie sind eigentlich immer im Arbeitsmodus – und haben deshalb auch nie Freizeit.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">3. Sie haben keine Zeit für Entspannung</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nie abzuschalten, ist hochgradig gesundheitsgefährdend. Gerade Menschen, die grundsätzlich viel leisten können und wollen, brauchten unbedingt Erholungsphasen, damit ihre Kraft erhalten bleibt. Dabei genügt es nicht, auf dem Sofa zu liegen und über den nächsten <a href="https://enablinghybridwork.cio.de/hoechste-sicherheit-fuer-behoerden-und-unternehmen" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Job</a> nachzudenken. Denn auch das Gehirn braucht Entspannung. Wer es ihm nie gönnt, ist allein schon deshalb ein Burnout-Kandidat.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">4. Ihre Standardantwort ist: Keine Zeit!</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wie oft haben Sie zuletzt gesagt: “Ich kann nicht, bin gerade im Stress!”, wenn ein Freund mit Ihnen ein Bier trinken gehen wollte? Wenn Sie seit drei Wochen oder mehr außer Arbeiten nichts gemacht haben, dann stimmt etwas nicht. Ein Leben, das ausschließlich aus <a href="https://enablinghybridwork.cio.de/hoechste-sicherheit-fuer-behoerden-und-unternehmen" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Arbeit</a> besteht, kann nicht Ihr Ziel sein.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">5. Jobs werden nicht pünktlich fertig</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das kann natürlich ganz unterschiedliche Gründe haben: insgesamt zu viel Arbeit, schlechte Organisation, schlechtes Briefing durch den Auftraggeber etc.<br>Der häufigste und gefährlichste Grund hängt allerdings eng mit Punkt zwei dieser Liste zusammen: Dadurch, dass sie immer im Arbeitsmodus sind und ihr Arbeitstag gefühlt 24 Stunden hat, gaukelt das <a href="https://cio.de/article/3669593/wie-manager-besser-entscheiden-2.html" target="_blank">Unterbewusstsein</a> Ihnen vor, Sie hätten für alles unendlich viel Zeit. Also gibt es auch keinen Grund, sofort mit irgendwas anzufangen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">6. Keine Zeit für eigene Projekte</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Freiberufler zu sein bedeutet, Freiheiten zu haben. Zum Beispiel die, neben den Jobs für Ihre Kunden eigene Projekte anzuschieben. Doch ein solches Projekt zu starten ist eine Sache, es anschließend auch durchzuziehen, eine andere. Wenn Sie mindestens ein Projekt haben, an das Sie glauben, das aber schon seit einem halben Jahr darauf wartet, weiterverfolgt zu werden, sollten Sie sich fragen, warum Sie ursprünglich gerne Freiberufler sein wollten.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">7. Sie haben keine Hobbys</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Oder doch, haben Sie natürlich schon, aber Sie kommen schon ewig nicht mehr dazu. Das Klavier ist seit einem Jahr so verstimmt, dass es keinen Spaß mehr macht. Den Klavierstimmer anrufen? Keine Zeit. Siebzig Euro kostet der Fitness-Club Sie jeden Monat, aber Sie haben keine Ahnung, wann Sie zuletzt dort waren.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">8. Sie lesen fast nie mehr ein Buch</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Klar, auch viele <a href="https://cio.de/article/3667117/chefs-haben-weniger-stress-als-mitarbeiter.html" target="_blank">Angestellte</a> tun das nicht. Aber für fast alle fällt Lesen in die Rubrik: Dinge, die ich schon lange mal wieder tun wollte. Wer Bücher liest, beweist sich selbst, dass er zumindest gelegentlich gerne auf andere Gedanken kommen möchte. Und dass er entschlossen ist, sich auch mal zu entspannen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">9. Freundschaften schlafen ein</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mehrere Menschen, die Ihnen lieb und teuer sind, haben Sie seit Monaten nicht mehr gesprochen. Nehmen Sie sich vor, einmal pro Woche zum Hörer zu greifen und Menschen anzurufen, die ihnen wichtig sind. Oder die Ihnen mit gutem Grund einmal wichtig waren.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Stress</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">… und ziehen Sie Yoga und weitere Meditationsübungen in Betracht. Diese Übungen sind die besten Mittel gegen Stress und tragen dazu bei, Stressgefühle abzubauen. Ganz abgesehen vom gesundheitlichen Nutzen dienen die Trainings auch dazu, den Stress besser zu managen.<br><br>Obwohl wir natürlich seit unserer Geburt atmen, wissen die meisten von uns nicht, wie man richtig atmet. Viele atmen in einer oberflächlichen Art und Weise – besonders in stressbetonten oder unruhigen Zeiten. Tiefes Atmen durch den Bauch kann zur inneren Ruhe beitragen. Und es hilft, in unbequemen und angespannten Situationen einen kühlen Kopf zu bewahren.<br><br>Wer sich die Zeit nimmt um darüber zu sprechen, wie die vielen Veränderungen und Schwierigkeiten am Arbeitsplatz die einzelnen Mitarbeiter bewegen, kann die Arbeitsmoral heben. Es ist ein Fehler zu glauben, Menschen seien nicht verängstigt und besorgt und der Arbeitsplatz sei davon nicht betroffen.<br><br>Die Zeiten sind angespannt und schwierige Veränderungen in Organisationen sind die Regel. Daher sind Ehrlichkeit, Glaubwürdigkeit und Offenheit so wichtig. Heute ist es mehr als je zuvor entscheidend, eine positive Einstellung in der Belegschaft auszulösen. Stellen Sie Fragen, die zu Lösungen ermuntern wie “Was läuft heute gut, was sind unsere Stärken, wie möchten wir, dass dieses Unternehmen aussieht?”<br><br>Leute arbeiten intensiver für das, woran sie glauben und was sie zur Schaffung beigetragen haben. Das ist ein entscheidender Punkt, der während einer tiefgreifenden Umgestaltung am Arbeitsplatz geprüft werden muss. Was das mögliche Ausmaß des Arbeitsplatz-Wandels betrifft, sollten Mitarbeiter frühzeitig in die Entwicklung einbezogen werden.<br><br>Bücher, Gruppen, Familie und enge Freunde sowie Trainer können wichtige Quellen sein, um sich den eigenen Gefühlen bewusster zu werden. Auch kann man dadurch leichter lernen, mit diesen Gefühlen umzugehen, um sich über sein Verhalten im Klaren zu werden. Besonders sollte man darauf achten, wie man andere Menschen anspricht.<br><br>Was man tut oder lässt, hat direkten Einfluss darauf, was Mitarbeiter glauben, was akzeptabel ist. Seien Sie ein überzeugendes Beispiel dafür, dass ein ausgeglichenes Verhältnis zwischen Beruf und Privatleben von Bedeutung ist. Essen Sie mit anderen zu Mittag und motivieren Sie Kollegen dazu mitzukommen. Auch Spaß und Lachen am Arbeitsplatz sind erwünscht, da dies Stress reduzierende Faktoren sind.<br><br>Wer sich immer nur auf das Negative konzentriert, tut weder seiner Gesundheit noch seiner Denkweise einen Gefallen. Und seien wir ehrlich: Der Anteil an positiven und erbaulichen Geschichten in den Nachrichten fällt eindeutig spärlich aus. Es ist extrem wichtig, sich so gut wie möglich von jeglichem Trübsal abzukapseln und wieder mit Leuten Kontakt aufnehmen bzw. Dinge zu tun, die Spaß machen.<br><br>Konzentrieren Sie sich auf den Kern Ihrer Arbeit. Jetzt ist Zeit, mit den Mitarbeitern Prioritäten zu setzen und sich darüber Gedanken zu machen, welche Projekte einen perfekten Lösungsansatz erfordern. Nicht jedes Projekt kann an oberster Stelle stehen. Gerade in wirtschaftlich angespannten Zeiten sind Brainstorming-Sitzungen wichtiger denn je.<br></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[SpaceX gelingt erfolgreicher Starship-Test – aber ein Problem bleibt]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Nach zwei Verzögerungen ist das Starship von SpaceX am frühen Abend des 24. Juli 2026 (Ortszeit) zu seinem 13. Testflug abgehoben. Trotz holpriger Landung sprachen die Verantwortlichen von einem Erfolg. Probleme bereitet aber der Hitzeschild.weiterlesen auf t3n.de]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694859/it-nachrichten/spacex-gelingt-erfolgreicher-starship-test-aber-ein-problem-bleibt/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694859/it-nachrichten/spacex-gelingt-erfolgreicher-starship-test-aber-ein-problem-bleibt/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 21:03:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nach zwei Verzögerungen ist das Starship von SpaceX am frühen Abend des 24. Juli 2026 (Ortszeit) zu seinem 13. Testflug abgehoben. Trotz holpriger Landung sprachen die Verantwortlichen von einem Erfolg. Probleme bereitet aber der Hitzeschild.<a href="https://t3n.de/news/spacex-starship-test-problem-1754817/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=newsFeed&amp;utm_campaign=newsFeed">weiterlesen auf t3n.de</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Zimbra-Zero-Day in Classic UI: gespeichertes XSS stiehlt Mail, 2FA-Codes und Tokens]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[LONDON (IT BOLTWISE) – Eine behördlich abgestimmte Sicherheitswarnung beschreibt, wie ein russisch unterstütztes Spionage-Cluster über ein damals unbekanntes Zimbra-Webmail-Problem an die Inhalte westlicher Postfächer gelangte. Entscheidend ist die Angriffstechnik: Das Öffnen oder nur das Anzeige...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694807/it-security-nachrichten/zimbra-zero-day-in-classic-ui-gespeichertes-xss-stiehlt-mail-2fa-codes-und-tokens/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694807/it-security-nachrichten/zimbra-zero-day-in-classic-ui-gespeichertes-xss-stiehlt-mail-2fa-codes-und-tokens/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 20:03:55 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="1024" height="1024" src="https://www.it-boltwise.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/zimbra-classic-ui-gespeichertes-xss-2fa-codes.jpg" class="attachment- size- wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://www.it-boltwise.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/zimbra-classic-ui-gespeichertes-xss-2fa-codes.jpg 1024w, https://www.it-boltwise.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/zimbra-classic-ui-gespeichertes-xss-2fa-codes-300x300.jpg 300w, https://www.it-boltwise.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/zimbra-classic-ui-gespeichertes-xss-2fa-codes-150x150.jpg 150w, https://www.it-boltwise.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/zimbra-classic-ui-gespeichertes-xss-2fa-codes-768x768.jpg 768w, https://www.it-boltwise.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/zimbra-classic-ui-gespeichertes-xss-2fa-codes-840x840.jpg 840w, https://www.it-boltwise.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/zimbra-classic-ui-gespeichertes-xss-2fa-codes-120x120.jpg 120w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px">LONDON (IT BOLTWISE) – Eine behördlich abgestimmte Sicherheitswarnung beschreibt, wie ein russisch unterstütztes Spionage-Cluster über ein damals unbekanntes Zimbra-Webmail-Problem an die Inhalte westlicher Postfächer gelangte. Entscheidend ist die Angriffstechnik: Das Öffnen oder nur das Anzeigen einer präparierten E-Mail in der anfälligen Classic UI reicht, um Schadcode im authentifizierten Sitzungskontext auszuführen. Betroffen sind Zimbra Collaboration 10.0 […]</p>
<div><a href="https://www.it-boltwise.de/zimbra-zero-day-in-classic-ui-gespeichertes-xss-stiehlt-mail-2fa-codes-und-tokens.html">... den vollständigen Artikel <strong>»Zimbra-Zero-Day in Classic UI: gespeichertes XSS stiehlt Mail, 2FA-Codes und Tokens«</strong> lesen</a></div>
<p>Dieser Beitrag <a href="https://www.it-boltwise.de/zimbra-zero-day-in-classic-ui-gespeichertes-xss-stiehlt-mail-2fa-codes-und-tokens.html">Zimbra-Zero-Day in Classic UI: gespeichertes XSS stiehlt Mail, 2FA-Codes und Tokens</a> erschien als erstes auf <a href="https://www.it-boltwise.de/">IT BOLTWISE x Artificial Intelligence</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[China is Creating a Herd of 100 Elite Yak Clones]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[CNN reports on yaks "designed and cloned" in secretive, high-altitude labs in Tibet — 2.4 miles (4,000 meters) above sea level. They're a critical part of the local economy, and researchers "hope to create an 'elite' herd of super-yaks, healthier and more fertile than their predecessors."



Both...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694805/it-security-nachrichten/china-is-creating-a-herd-of-100-elite-yak-clones/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694805/it-security-nachrichten/china-is-creating-a-herd-of-100-elite-yak-clones/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 20:01:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[CNN reports on yaks "designed and cloned" in secretive, high-altitude labs in Tibet — 2.4 miles (4,000 meters) above sea level. They're a critical part of the local economy, and researchers "hope to create an 'elite' herd of super-yaks, healthier and more fertile than their predecessors."



Both domestic yaks and their wild cousins have been facing threats for years, with some rare subspecies at risk of disappearing entirely. Authorities in the southwestern Chinese region have poured tens of millions of dollars into boosting the yak industry in recent years — and they hope cloning can help. The first yak clone came in July 2025, Chinese state media hailing it as a breakthrough achievement that combined cloning with gene selection. More clones were born this spring — and researchers are now aiming to create a herd of more than 100 "elite" yak clones by 2028, boasting desired traits like faster growth and larger size. "This shows the technology has moved from a one-time success to a stable, mass-scale application," said Fang Shengguo, the project's scientific lead and director of the State Conservation Center for Gene Resources of Endangered Wildlife, according to state-run news agency Xinhua... 


Many experts acknowledge there are legitimate arguments for using cloning in conservation, and for gene selection in farming. But the ethical waters are murky, and any such project should have high levels of public transparency and accountability, said Lisa Moses, a veterinarian and bioethicist at Harvard Medical School. So far, much of the yak cloning project remains mysterious, with information largely limited to glowing state-media coverage... 


[S]ome scientists say these projects reduce our sense of urgency toward fixing the environment, and that we can't simply churn out clones while the planet burns. To truly enact change, they say, we have to continue addressing the root cause of the problem — restoring degraded habitats, lowering carbon emissions, cracking down on poaching, and more. But for others, "there is a strong feeling ... that traditional conservation is essentially failing now," Moses said. "What we've been doing for the last 100 years to try to stave off ecological destruction is not working.... The argument is, we don't have a choice," she added. "If we want to try to do something that will actually make a difference, we need to use these technologies, specifically synthetic biology, to essentially override evolution and change the fitness of the species for the environment that they live in." 

"History is littered with good intentions in the environment gone wrong," Moses said, "and I would argue that these technologies have even more unknowns than ones that we previously employed."

 

The article points out that the number of wild yaks "dropped more than a third in the last 30 years,
with just 10,000 to 20,000 individuals left, according to the Wildlife Conservation Society." 


The yaks are threatened by climate change and habitat degradation, "with warmer temperatures bringing invasive plant species and increased competition for resources... in one of the world's most inhospitable terrains."<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=China+is+Creating+a+Herd+of+100+Elite+Yak+Clones%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fscience.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F25%2F1656259%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fscience.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F25%2F1656259%2Fchina-is-creating-a-herd-of-100-elite-yak-clones%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://science.slashdot.org/story/26/07/25/1656259/china-is-creating-a-herd-of-100-elite-yak-clones?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[You can’t ignore Google Zero anymore]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The web and Google once had a deal: Google collects data and indexes webpages and in exchange sends oceans of traffic to websites. The deal wasn't perfect and certainly made Google more money than it made the websites, but it worked for a long time. Now, however, the deal seems to be dead. And th...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694782/ai-nachrichten/you-cant-ignore-google-zero-anymore/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694782/ai-nachrichten/you-cant-ignore-google-zero-anymore/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The web and Google once had a deal: Google collects data and indexes webpages and in exchange sends oceans of traffic to websites. The deal wasn't perfect and certainly made Google more money than it made the websites, but it worked for a long time. Now, however, the deal seems to be dead. And the […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple could ‘run the table’ on AI if it does things right]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Looking ahead just a short time, Apple could hold a powerful position in AI where it most makes sense: deployment.



Not only will the company offer up its own AI models for the kind of tasks millions use ChatGPT to do today, but it will provide more sophisticated on-device agentic models to hel...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694780/ai-nachrichten/apple-could-run-the-table-on-ai-if-it-does-things-right/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694780/ai-nachrichten/apple-could-run-the-table-on-ai-if-it-does-things-right/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking ahead just a short time, Apple could hold a powerful position in AI where it most makes sense: deployment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not only will the company offer up its own AI models for the kind of tasks millions use ChatGPT to do today, but it will provide more sophisticated on-device agentic models to help users get things done through Siri AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple also <a href="https://www.macobserver.com/news/apple-calls-its-new-assistant-siri-ai-at-wwdc-2026-gemini-partnership-now-official/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">offers limited capacity for more complex tasks</a> through <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apple-commences-us-manufacturing-of-private-cloud-compute-servers/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Private Cloud Compute</a>, and, in partnership with the likes of Google in the US and Alibaba in China, the company is giving users a trusted conduit through which to access even more sophisticated AI services. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Deeply deployable</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Critics can say it <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4168225/wwdc-2026-how-apple-can-take-a-great-leap-in-ai.html">took Apple a long time</a> to get to this point, but they also seem to think the company has finally got the mix right with its series 27 operating systems. Arriving late to a party <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4164979/apple-will-be-behind-on-ai-until-it-isnt.html">doesn’t mean you won’t shine once you get there</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple is also coming up the inside lane around frontier AI, with iterative OS and hardware enhancements that mean its devices become increasingly effective for <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4016798/why-i-hope-apple-keeps-investing-in-on-device-ai.html">Edge AI use cases</a>, on device — no cloud service required.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company appears to be digging down into those use cases. Mark Gurman at Bloomberg recently predicted that <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/semiconductors/apples-rumored-m7-ultra-targets-1-5tb-of-memory-and-blackwell-class-ai" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">future M7 Ultra Macs</a> will support as much as 1.5TB RAM, making these systems more than capable of running full weight frontier models in people’s offices, colleges, and homes. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While that does assume the <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4187825/the-trillion-dollar-ai-hallucination.html">AI-flationary memory market</a> can supply that much RAM at prices humans can afford, it is also true that people are already <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4092162/apples-macos-ai-for-the-rest-of-us.html">running AI clusters</a> using off-the-shelf Mac minis networked over Thunderbolt cables. It’s no stretch to believe <a href="https://www.applemust.com/macweb-now-offers-mac-mini-cloud-clusters-in-east-coast-data-centre/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">this will continue to be the case</a>, and that it will even broaden as the power/performance offered at the high end grows.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>What’s wrong with good enough?</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When combined with open AI stacks, particularly newly emerging varieties, Apple’s platforms should become leading contenders for <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4074648/apples-big-bang-ai-moment-is-approaching.html">private AI services</a> and edge AI. Many business users will leap at the chance to offer their workers powerful, self-hosted, private AI services using one or more daisy-chained Mac Studios or Mac minis. The recent craze in deployment of both Macs to support <a href="https://openclaw.ai/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">OpenClaw</a> instances shows they already are.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, these different slices of momentum mean I agree with <a href="https://podcastalpha.substack.com/p/all-in-can-ai-regulate-itself-stripe" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">investor Jason Calacanis</a> that Apple is in position to apply a great deal of pressure on OpenAI and Claude just by putting models on their devices. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s also worth thinking about how people use AI today. How many of the queries made in the world right now constitute relatively simple tasks that could be transacted by on-device AI, such as the emerging new version of Apple Intelligence or even smaller LLM models running on device? You can even run <a href="https://9to5mac.com/2026/07/14/prismml-releases-bonsai-27b-claiming-first-major-ai-model-of-its-size-fit-for-iphone/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">PrismML’s 1-bit, 27-billion parameter Bonsai</a> on an iPad using the Locally app, and that’s in the here and now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What happens? Pretty soon you’ll find people recognize that they can already run the vast majority of their AI-augmented workflows using services they <a href="https://www.applemust.com/morgan-stanley-its-when-not-if-apple-will-deliver-ai-on-the-edge/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">have on their existing device</a> or can access on their on-prem Mac set-ups. And, of course, as people get used to running small tasks locally and larger tasks on premises, the actual space in which they need to turn to cloud-based frontier models <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4195657/apple-is-prepping-for-life-after-the-ai-gold-rush.html">will erode</a>. That’s even as companies like PrismML work towards slimming down full-weight models so they don’t need to run on a server at all. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It’s going to be wild when people have unlimited tokens on their desks,” said Calacanis in a podcast round table discussion.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Who has the most to lose?</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The current incarnations of AI felt like they came from nowhere. Most people weren’t aware of the technology until returning to work after the 2022 holiday season. Since then, the industry has proliferated with dozens of competing models, most recently including powerful but affordable frontier models such as Qwen and Kimi.ai.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These models aren’t necessarily all as good as one another, but in many cases for much of what we do, we’ll find them to be good enough. That’s an existential crisis for some, as industry observers now think the inevitable pricing pressure means some services might have over-invested in capacity before finding any way to turn a profit.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those profit-seeking services are the ones with the most to lose as Apple extends its hardware advantage, democratizing AI access for all while providing platforms suitable for edge AI, on-premises AI, private AI, and even AI access using third-party services. (The need for the latter will shrink as the capabilities of the former get better.)</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Cupertino rising</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What does this all mean? While the industry remains young, it is already fragmenting. And striding through the dust of that process comes Apple, equipped with the hardware, software, and approach to build its business even as the enterprise of first mover AI services erodes. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>You can follow me on social media! Join me on <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/jonnyevanssays.bsky.social" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">BlueSky</a>,  <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/@jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mastodon</a> and subscribe to my daily Apple-related news summaries at <a href="https://thecorenews.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-core?r=5l3lg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Core</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Monday.com cuts 20% of its workforce to restructure for the AI era]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Healthy software companies typically don’t suddenly eliminate one-fifth of their workforce, but monday.com is doing just that as it bets on flatter teams, AI agents, and customer implementation expertise as the winning combination in the AI era.



Monday.com co-founder and co-CEO Eran Zinman tod...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694771/ai-nachrichten/mondaycom-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694771/ai-nachrichten/mondaycom-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Healthy software companies typically don’t suddenly eliminate one-fifth of their workforce, but monday.com is doing just that as it bets on flatter teams, AI agents, and customer implementation expertise as the winning combination in the AI era.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monday.com co-founder and co-CEO Eran Zinman <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/building-mondaycom-its-next-chapter-eran-zinman-cxx4e/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">today announced</a> the “very difficult decision” to reduce the AI work platform company’s global workforce by about 20%, or 620 people.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The move has nothing to do with increasing margins or replacing humans with AI, he insisted in his post on LinkedIn; rather, it’s a calculated decision to trim down and hone the company’s focus as AI becomes integral to day-to-day workflows.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This is not a distress signal; it is a deliberate reset, disclosed with its price attached,” said <a href="https://greyhoundresearch.com/svg/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sanchit Vir Gogia</a>, chief analyst at Greyhound Research. “The industry has quietly swapped the meaning of productivity, and this filing is the clearest exhibit yet.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A ‘significant opportunity’ in technology</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In a <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1845338/000117891326003553/zk2635715.htm" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">SEC filing</a> this week, monday.com said its restructuring plan reflects the “ongoing transformation of its product, marketing, and go-to-market strategy.” The move is intended to support a “leaner, more focused operating model” as the company continues to invest in its AI-driven strategy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zinman noted in his post that the company has shifted to “doing the work with AI and not just managing it,” and is focused on building environments where “people and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/411198/how-to-launch-your-ai-projects-from-pilot-to-production-and-ensure-success.html" target="_blank">AI agents</a> [work] together in one workspace.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In recent months, monday.com has <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/3822438/monday-com-aims-to-be-an-ai-first-platform-with-latest-enhancements.html" target="_blank">evolved its products</a>, strategy, and the way it serves its customers, and Zinman contended that “the organization we built for our previous chapter is not the organization that fits the new AI era.” Monday.com needs to “execute more decisively,” take on new challenges, and quickly respond to market changes, he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We have never seen such a significant opportunity in software, driven by such exciting technology,” Zinman noted. He emphasized that the reduction is not to replace people with AI, nor to improve margins; the “vast majority” of savings will be reinvested into talent, products, and AI.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The restructuring will result in a “flatter organization” with fewer management layers and smaller, more autonomous teams, and monday.com also has a new go-to-market model, Zinman explained. Customers expect “deeper implementation support” as they deploy AI, and the company will work more closely with customers, increase its on-site presence, create new roles, and “adapt many existing ones.” In its SEC filing, the company said it expects to continue hiring in “key strategic areas” throughout 2026.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Workers will be expected to work better, “not harder,” Zinman noted. He pointed to several past examples where work could have been done in a few days, but instead took many months with “multiple meetings and endless friction.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This wasn’t people’s fault and everyone was frustrated by this,” he said. “Our new org changes ownership to allow people to make decisions and move fast.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A spokesperson for monday.com declined to comment further on the staff reductions.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Monday.com’s key market advantages</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monday.com certainly isn’t struggling; the company expects 19% to 20% year-over-year growth in 2026.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Companies in that position do not restructure because they must,” Greyhound’s Gogia noted. “They restructure because they have decided to become something else.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/team/melody-brue/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Melody Brue</a>, VP and principal analyst at Moor Insights &amp; Strategy, pointed out that organizational redesign is important for real AI transformation, but while it can signal confidence to the market, it can still be “devastating” to humans.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While the company looks as though it’s trying to do right, that ultimately remains to be seen, she said. “There are often hidden internal bruises that can surface long after layoffs.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Monday.com’s advantage is in its “structured substrate,” Gogia noted; its boards, permissions and typed workflows give agents something firmer to act on than just documents and chat history. The company highlights its natively built agents that can be configured by any team member, as well as connectors with Claude, Microsoft Copilot, and ChatGPT, and dedicated routes for external agents to authenticate and operate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“For some time, the sharper enterprise question has been shifting from who has an agent to who owns the governed runtime in which an agent can safely act,” he said. “Structured work is a serious claim on that runtime.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But parts of monday.com’s agent estate remain in staged release, and its product is ultimately “mid-transition,” Gogia pointed out; its agent builder carried a beta label as recently as March,. Also, the company’s pricing model changed in May to a hybrid model charging for seats as well as mandatory AI credits. And, while its AI-powered no-code builder monday vibe passed $1 million in annual recurring revenue within two and a half months, monday.com has not released subsequent outcomes, usage volumes, or attach rates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Further, there’s an element of “gravity” with its competitors, he observed. Asana is reorganizing teams around agents, Atlassian is wiring agents into the developer estate, and others are simply bundling them into their offerings: Microsoft is doing so across the productivity stack, and ServiceNow across enterprise operations, each with identity and procurement built in.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Their pull is strongest exactly where monday.com wants to grow, in the largest accounts, where control-plane depth and administrative reach decide the deal,” said Gogia.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Actions for the near-term</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Going forward, buyers should focus on operating risk, not headline risk, Moor’s Brue noted. In practice, that’s continuity of service, roadmap consistency, and strength of enterprise support. Productivity should be valued as better outcomes per unit of organizational effort, not mere activity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It should be a measure of how much smoother, faster, and more effective the operating model becomes when AI is built into the work,” said Brue.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gogia noted that strain surfaces first in customer service, and monday.com’s attention is being redistributed. The company’s annual report disclosed that its focus is now concentrated on the largest accounts, with support for medium-sized clients moved to an AI-first and human-supported model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During the first month of the transition, buyers should track named account continuity and escalation times, he advised. By the first quarter, keep an eye on whether credit governance and admin controls mature on schedule, and if the roadmap beyond the AI estate keeps pace. By the half-year mark, determine whether promised implementation depth is producing outcomes or “simply more billable engagement.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Support tiers should be enumerated in writing before renewal, and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4192312/4-recs-for-cios-to-optimize-ai-budgets-and-improve-sustainability.html" target="_blank">buyers should contract</a> for “side exits,” Gogia emphasized, with overage pricing fixed in advance, the right to pause consumption, and portability for workflows and agent configuration “if the relationship sours.” Finance should also insist on monthly consumption reporting by capability. Further, integration efforts, partner dependency, and change management should be considered first-class costs of the agent era, “not as afterthoughts to a license.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“A license was a known cost,” said Gogia. “A meter is a behavior, and behavior is harder to forecast than headcount.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article originally appeared on <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4200330/monday-com-cuts-20-of-its-workforce-to-restructure-for-the-ai-era.html" target="_blank">CIO.com</a>.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Own nothing, upgrade everything: Apple’s new Klarna deal]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Just in time for the iPhone’s 20th anniversary, Apple is moving closer to becoming a service company. It is set to launch its new deal with Klarna next week and when it does, Apple enthusiasts in the US will effectively be able to subscribe to their favorite Apple hardware, with the cost spread a...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694772/ai-nachrichten/own-nothing-upgrade-everything-apples-new-klarna-deal/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694772/ai-nachrichten/own-nothing-upgrade-everything-apples-new-klarna-deal/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Just in time for the iPhone’s 20th anniversary, Apple is moving closer to becoming a service company. It is set to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/business/apple-launch-upgrade-device-leasing-program-spur-sales-bloomberg-news-reports-2026-07-21/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">launch its new deal</a> with Klarna next week and when it does, Apple enthusiasts in the US will effectively be able to subscribe to their favorite Apple hardware, with the cost spread across up to three years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This matters because when combined with Apple One and Apple’s Creator Studio subscriptions, the Klarna arrangement brings Apple closer to offering a full subscription model for hardware, software, and services. The only thing you don’t get under the new arrangement is AppleCare, for which you’ll allegedly need to pay extra.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Moving closer to hardware-as-a-service</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apple has slowly been <a href="https://www.applemust.com/opinion-how-you-will-access-apple-products-in-future/#google_vignette" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">transitioning toward</a> hardware-as-a-service for almost a decade. Back then, Forrester analyst <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apple-klarna-mean-we-can-now-get-apple-as-a-service/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Frank Gillet predicted</a> the company would eventually offer bundles of services and products for a monthly, all-in, fee. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This isn’t quite where we are yet; you still need at least three subscriptions to get close. But, after the better part of a decade, Apple has moved much nearer to the hardware-as-a-service idea.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are some products reportedly excluded from the arrangement, including MacBook Neo, Apple Watch SE, the entry-level iPad, and iPhone 16. Clearly, Apple sees those products as sufficiently affordable. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Easy payments for RAM-ageddon</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The new Klarna arrangement comes as Apple is forced to increase product prices as AI-driven memory price inflation becomes widely felt across every economy. In theory, I assume, Apple hopes to make its products available to cash-strapped consumers who need new hardware, while also navigating a time of deep economic tumult and uncertainty. It’s thought the company has <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-04-06/will-apple-raise-iphone-prices-in-the-us-after-trump-tariffs-iphone-17-details" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">previously rejected these plans</a> to protect normal hardware sales, but normality is a kingdom we no longer seem to possess. Interesting times. Probable inflation incoming.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Apple Upgrade lands at precisely the moment Apple needs it,” IDC analyst Francisco Jeronimo wrote in a note seen by <em>Computerworld</em>. “Having just pushed Mac and iPad prices up on the back of the memory shortage, with iPhone increases widely expected in September — as well as the new iPhone foldable expected at $2,500 — Apple’s real risk is that rising prices even further can impact the upgrade cycle.” </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>New age, new shopping habits</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The introduction of the scheme gives consumers a way to purchase the company’s popular high-end devices when they are introduced — no doubt,at higher cost — this fall. Plus, of course, if it’s <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/general-motors-gm-earnings-subscriptions-revenue-business-2026-1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">good enough for GM</a>, it’s good enough for Apple.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s all about attitude, too. From Apple’s perspective, it <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4125784/are-you-ready-for-apple-as-a-service.html">has done plenty of the groundwork</a> required to <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apple-vp-eddy-cue-shares-15-important-apple-services-stats/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">convince its customers</a> that subscription payments for things you value are no bad thing. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Reluctance to embrace “Access Not Ownership’”purchasing models has dropped dramatically since Apple — and <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/1665439/apples-tim-cook-has-kept-his-50b-services-promises.html">CEO Tim Cook</a> — first began <a href="https://www.applemust.com/apples-50b-services-target-just-isnt-ambitious-enough/">banging the drum</a> for services income. Apple’s services stream has now become its second-biggest revenue driver after the iPhone. It has over 1 billion paid subscriptions, and an active hardware installed base of <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4168225/wwdc-2026-how-apple-can-take-a-great-leap-in-ai.html">more than 2.5 billion devices globally</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A combination of changed customer habits and external threat means the stars are now aligned for hardware-as-a-service models. “Reframing a device as a low monthly payment protects that [upgrade] cadence and allows Apple to start marketing their products as device-as-a-service to consumers, which no other vendor was ever able to do,” Jeronimo wrote to me. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is a one-more-thing aspect to this: the products are effectively being leased, a new approach that will give Apple a stronger grip on EOL devices, helping it grab more of them for refurbishment, resale, and recycling. Over time, this will give the company a much stronger grip on the lucrative second-user market that exists around Apple equipment, even while for almost every consumer product we find the life we want is something we can rent, but <a href="https://medium.com/from-heart-to-hand/the-subscription-society-what-happens-when-you-own-nothing-ef32d5bc32d2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">probably can’t afford to own</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Managing future risk</strong></h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The other solid reason to take a partnership approach is risk management. Apple had intended to develop its own buy-now, pay-later scheme via Apple Pay Later, but <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c255y82y9x8o" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">abandoned that plan</a> as it became riskier with rising bank rates. “Also, by backing the program with Klarna rather than reviving the in-house subscription plan it shelved in 2024, Apple captures the demand upside without taking the credit risk onto its own balance sheet,” Jeronimo said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>You can follow me on social media! Join me on <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/jonnyevanssays.bsky.social" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">BlueSky</a>,  <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LinkedIn</a>, <a href="https://social.vivaldi.net/@jonnyevans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mastodon</a> and subscribe to <a href="https://thecorenews.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-core?r=5l3lg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Core</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI Presence raises new questions about enterprise automation and jobs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[OpenAI has launched Presence, an enterprise service for deploying voice and chat agents that can resolve customer and employee requests, potentially automating some work now handled by frontline support teams.



The agents can answer questions and operate IT systems, and enterprises can decide w...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694769/ai-nachrichten/openai-presence-raises-new-questions-about-enterprise-automation-and-jobs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694769/ai-nachrichten/openai-presence-raises-new-questions-about-enterprise-automation-and-jobs/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI has launched Presence, an enterprise service for deploying voice and chat agents that can resolve customer and employee requests, potentially automating some work now handled by frontline support teams.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The agents can answer questions and operate IT systems, and enterprises can decide what actions the agents may take and when they should seek human approval for actions or transfer a case to a human.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI is already using Presence internally for its English-language phone support channel, where it verifies callers and uses account information to complete approved actions. The company said the system resolves 75% of inbound issues without human assistance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another OpenAI service, Codex, can be used to monitor agents and suggest updates or improvements to processes. In OpenAI’s own tests, suggestions from Codex helped reduce handoffs to humans by 15 percentage points over 10 days, it said. Presence also includes simulation and evaluation tools that allow companies to test an agent before deployment. The tests assess whether it reaches the correct outcome, follows company policy, and hands a case to an employee when required.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI intends each Presence deployment to deal with one kind of task, for example billing issues, insurance claims, or employee IT service requests, with agents getting only the knowledge and system access required for that task.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Presence is not a self-service product: Enterprises will have to sign up for the limited availability program, with integration performed by OpenAI or selected <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4136024/openai-partners-with-consulting-giants-to-deploy-enterprise-ai-agents.html">global systems integrators</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Companies exploring or testing Presence include Spanish bank BBVA, which is evaluating the service for everyday banking support in Mexico, and Japanese technology group SoftBank, which is using it in trials involving Japanese-language customer interactions. Australian insurer IAG is assessing whether the technology can help it respond to surges in customer demand during severe weather events.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Workforce impact</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI’s announcement did not address the potential effect of Presence on employment. But its claimed automation rate raises questions about how the technology could affect staffing in customer service and other support functions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://pareekh.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Pareekh Jain</a>, CEO of Pareekh Consulting, said CIOs should regard the 75% figure as evidence that the technology can work, rather than as a benchmark that every enterprise can expect to reach.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jain said OpenAI’s deployment benefits from being built around the company’s own products and data. Large enterprises may achieve lower automation rates because they must contend with fragmented legacy systems, uneven knowledge bases and more complex compliance demands.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Most organizations should expect lower initial automation levels that improve over time as the AI agent is refined,” Jain said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first workforce effect is more likely to be <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4015750/cios-see-ai-prompting-new-it-hiring-even-as-boards-push-for-job-cuts.html">slower hiring than immediate layoffs</a>, according to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/tulikasheel/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tulika Sheel</a>, senior vice president at Kadence International.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The roles most exposed are likely to be repetitive, high-volume functions such as frontline customer support and routine back-office processing,” Sheel said. “However, I would expect the first impact to be on hiring and team growth rather than immediate large-scale job cuts. Over time, enterprises may redesign roles around AI-assisted workflows, with humans focusing more on complex cases, escalation, and relationship management.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jain said Tier-1 support agents handling predictable queries would face the most exposure. Broader reductions would become more likely only after companies reorganize their operations around the technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, <a href="https://omdia.tech.informa.com/authors/lian-jye-su" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lian Jye Su</a>, chief analyst at Omdia, said Presence is unlikely to increase the threat of job displacement because companies have used similar customer-support automation from vendors such as Genesys, NiCE, Five9 and AWS for years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises are more likely to use Presence alongside employees, with AI handling routine requests while people remain responsible for work requiring judgment and empathy, Su said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Cost and operational risks</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Analysts said CIOs should examine whether Presence can maintain resolution quality as usage grows, since fewer human handoffs could leave employees dealing with a more difficult mix of cases.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The key question is not simply how many tasks AI can handle, but whether it can handle them reliably at scale,” Sheel said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The financial case will depend partly on the cost of connecting Presence to existing systems and maintaining the controls needed to govern its use, according to Jain. “Often the biggest cost of enterprise AI is not tokens but <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4128310/openai-responds-to-claude-cowork-with-its-own-platform-to-help-build-deploy-and-manage-ai-agents.html">integration and governance</a>,” Jain added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Companies will need to determine what systems and data the agents can access, monitor their performance, and audit the actions they take. Those investments could offset early savings.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Su said the complexity of enterprise IT will make it difficult for OpenAI to automate entire workflows on its own. Enterprises will still need to work with other technology providers and human employees, while CIOs will favor systems that can be audited and integrated with existing infrastructure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jain said the economics could improve if companies use the same integrations and governance controls across additional workflows.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4200684/openai-presence-raises-new-questions-about-enterprise-automation-and-jobs.html">CIO</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft explains why its West US Azure and cloud services failed]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft cloud and Azure services hosted on the West Coast of the US went down for hours on Thursday when network connectivity failed. Although services running entirely within Microsoft’s West US cloud region were unaffected, any traffic entering or leaving the facilities was affected.



Micro...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694765/ai-nachrichten/microsoft-explains-why-its-west-us-azure-and-cloud-services-failed/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694765/ai-nachrichten/microsoft-explains-why-its-west-us-azure-and-cloud-services-failed/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:50:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft cloud and Azure services hosted on the West Coast of the US went down for hours on Thursday when network connectivity failed. Although services running entirely within Microsoft’s West US cloud region were unaffected, any traffic entering or leaving the facilities was affected.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft has now published a Preliminary Post Incident Review (PIR) of the incident, reporting that connectivity was lost for five hours between 14.44 UTC (7.44 a.m. Pacific Time) and 19.41 UTC on July 23. The problem was caused when a set of IP routes was removed in error while isolating a device for routine maintenance.<strong></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before starting the maintenance work, Microsoft checked that at least one of the two redundant paths to the facility remained operational. When it came to starting the work, however, automated systems included some additional devices in the perimeter to be isolated, and removing some IP routes that had not been included in the initial assessment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Customers discovered the problems very quickly, and engineers identified the issue within the first hour and started to reconnect services.  Microsoft said the disruption had been caused by some “recent fiber maintenance activity”.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To minimize the risk of disruption from such errors in the future, Microsoft advised organizations handling mission-critical data to consider a multi-region approach.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Azure outage was the second significant one to hit Microsoft this year. In February, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4127142/azure-outage-disrupts-vms-and-identity-services-for-over-10-hours.ht">there was a 10-hour disruption to US West and US East regions</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on Network World.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[One fallen power line exposed a growing AI data center problem. Here’s how to fix it.]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A close call in Northern Virginia revealed just how poorly data centers respond to grid disruptions. Here's how to fix the problem.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694724/ai-nachrichten/one-fallen-power-line-exposed-a-growing-ai-data-center-problem-heres-how-to-fix-it/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694724/ai-nachrichten/one-fallen-power-line-exposed-a-growing-ai-data-center-problem-heres-how-to-fix-it/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:49:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A close call in Northern Virginia revealed just how poorly data centers respond to grid disruptions. Here's how to fix the problem.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New Humanoid Robot Trio Just Solved This MAJOR AI Problem ($13,271 HUMANOID)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[YouTube Video]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694719/ai-nachrichten/new-humanoid-robot-trio-just-solved-this-major-ai-problem-13271-humanoid/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694719/ai-nachrichten/new-humanoid-robot-trio-just-solved-this-major-ai-problem-13271-humanoid/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:49:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube Video</p><p><iframe loading="lazy" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/tz-eOi-SBzQ"></iframe></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Samsung und Broadcom schließen dicken Deal]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Samsung Electronics und der Halbleiter-Riese Broadcom bauen ihre strategische Zusammenarbeit aus. Im Rahmen des AI Summits in San Francisco unterzeichneten beide Unternehmen eine Absichtserklärung über eine...Zum Beitrag: Samsung und Broadcom schließen dicken Deal

Wo du uns folgen kannst:
Facebo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694676/it-nachrichten/samsung-und-broadcom-schliessen-dicken-deal/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694676/it-nachrichten/samsung-und-broadcom-schliessen-dicken-deal/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:36:34 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Samsung Electronics und der Halbleiter-Riese Broadcom bauen ihre strategische Zusammenarbeit aus. Im Rahmen des AI Summits in San Francisco unterzeichneten beide Unternehmen eine Absichtserklärung über eine...<p>Zum Beitrag: <a href="https://stadt-bremerhaven.de/samsung-und-broadcom-schliessen-dicken-deal/">Samsung und Broadcom schließen dicken Deal</a>
</p><p>
Wo du uns folgen kannst:
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/CaschysBlog">Facebook</a>, <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/CaschysBlog/">Reddit</a>, <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMQgKIitDQklTR2dnTWFoWUtGSE4wWVdSMExXSnlaVzFsY21oaGRtVnVMbVJsS0FBUAE?ceid=DE:de&amp;oc=3">Google News</a>, <a href="https://x.com/CaschysBlog">X</a>, <a href="https://www.threads.com/@caschysblog">Threads</a>
<br>
</p><div>
    <strong>Auf dem Laufenden bleiben?</strong>
    <br>
    <a href="https://www.google.com/preferences/source?q=stadt-bremerhaven.de">Fügt uns doch bei Google als bevorzugte Quelle hinzu!</a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[These 3 Fire TV Sticks are on sale at Best Buy - here's the one I recommend (and why)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Fire TV Sticks are back down to all-time low prices for Best Buy's Black Friday in July sale. We'll break down just how good of a deal you can get.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694587/hacking/these-3-fire-tv-sticks-are-on-sale-at-best-buy-heres-the-one-i-recommend-and-why/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694587/hacking/these-3-fire-tv-sticks-are-on-sale-at-best-buy-heres-the-one-i-recommend-and-why/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:03:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Fire TV Sticks are back down to all-time low prices for Best Buy's Black Friday in July sale. We'll break down just how good of a deal you can get.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[250 Eiffel Towers' worth of waste: The AI boom's toxic hardware problem]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Chips, servers, cables, and more could compound an already massive problem - here's who it affects and what's being done about it.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694584/hacking/250-eiffel-towers-worth-of-waste-the-ai-booms-toxic-hardware-problem/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694584/hacking/250-eiffel-towers-worth-of-waste-the-ai-booms-toxic-hardware-problem/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:03:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Chips, servers, cables, and more could compound an already massive problem - here's who it affects and what's being done about it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Node.js Trust Falls: Dangerous Module Resolution on Windows]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In September of 2024, ZDI received a vulnerability submission from an anonymous researcher affecting npm CLI that revealed a fundamental design issue in Node.js. This blog details how it continues to expose applications to local privilege escalation (LPE) attacks on Windows systems, including the...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694571/hacking/nodejs-trust-falls-dangerous-module-resolution-on-windows/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694571/hacking/nodejs-trust-falls-dangerous-module-resolution-on-windows/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">In September of 2024, ZDI received a vulnerability submission from an anonymous researcher affecting <a href="https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v11">npm CLI</a> that revealed a fundamental design issue in <a href="https://nodejs.org/en">Node.js</a>. This blog details how it continues to expose applications to local privilege escalation (LPE) attacks on Windows systems, including the Discord desktop app (CVE-2026-0776 0-Day), which remains unpatched and vulnerable.</p>





















  
  



<p>The issue is straightforward: when Node.js resolves modules, the runtime searches for packages in <code>C:\node_modules</code> as part of its default behavior. Since low-privileged Windows users can create this directory and plant malicious modules there, any Node.js application with missing or optional dependencies becomes vulnerable to privilege escalation.</p>




  <p class="">This issue is not new. Concerned discussions about Node.js's module search path behavior date back to <a href="https://groups.google.com/g/nodejs/c/5BGr5dliUIk/m/abJEH3sPymcJ">2013</a> and <a href="https://github.com/nodejs/node-v0.x-archive/issues/8830">2014</a>.</p><p class="">Node.js has explicitly <a href="https://github.com/nodejs/node/security/policy#uncontrolled-search-path-element-cwe-427">stated</a> that they consider this behavior intentional: </p><p class="">"Node.js trusts the file system." </p><p class="">They do not treat CWE-427 (Uncontrolled Search Path Element) as a vulnerability, pushing responsibility onto application developers. </p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/80c1a21b-6d10-4c27-8a9b-e05a32ee4c0b/nodejs-non-vulnerability-docs.png" data-image-dimensions="866x438" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/80c1a21b-6d10-4c27-8a9b-e05a32ee4c0b/nodejs-non-vulnerability-docs.png?format=1000w" width="866" height="438" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/80c1a21b-6d10-4c27-8a9b-e05a32ee4c0b/nodejs-non-vulnerability-docs.png?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/80c1a21b-6d10-4c27-8a9b-e05a32ee4c0b/nodejs-non-vulnerability-docs.png?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/80c1a21b-6d10-4c27-8a9b-e05a32ee4c0b/nodejs-non-vulnerability-docs.png?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/80c1a21b-6d10-4c27-8a9b-e05a32ee4c0b/nodejs-non-vulnerability-docs.png?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/80c1a21b-6d10-4c27-8a9b-e05a32ee4c0b/nodejs-non-vulnerability-docs.png?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/80c1a21b-6d10-4c27-8a9b-e05a32ee4c0b/nodejs-non-vulnerability-docs.png?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/80c1a21b-6d10-4c27-8a9b-e05a32ee4c0b/nodejs-non-vulnerability-docs.png?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
          
          <figcaption data-sqsp-image-classic-block-caption-container class="image-caption-wrapper">
            <p data-rte-preserve-empty="true"><em>Figure 1: The vendor’s security policy stance on CWE-427 as a non-issue</em></p>
          </figcaption>
        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  





  <p class="">As the case studies below demonstrate, this stance has dangerous consequences. Developers are largely unaware of this attack surface, and the result is a proliferation of exploitable applications. We will show examples in npm CLI and Discord, but there are likely many more applications that are impacted by this.</p><p class=""><strong>Root Cause</strong></p><p class="">The root cause lies in the way Node.js performs module resolution. This is documented <a href="https://nodejs.org/api/modules.html#loading-from-node-modules-folders">here.</a> Although UNIX paths are used in the documentation provided by Node.js, the same logic is applied on Windows.</p>





















  
  



<p>When a Node.js application calls require(‘bar’), the runtime searches for the module in the following order:  </p>
<ol>
<li>   C:\Users\Administrator\projects\node_modules\bar.js</li>
<li>   C:\Users\Administrator\node_modules\bar.js</li>
<li>   C:\Users\node_modules\bar.js</li>
<li>   C:\node_modules\bar.js              &lt;-- The problem</li>
</ol>
<p>If the legitimate package is missing, whether due to optional dependencies, development packages removed in production, or installation failures, the resolution search will eventually reach the root of the drive. Any user can create <code>C:\node_modules</code> and place a malicious package there. Once the low-privileged user has populated <code>C:\node_modules\bar.js</code>, Node.js will load and execute it in the context of the current user. In the following case studies, we will provide evidence of how, despite properly following NPM’s <a href="https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v11/configuring-npm/package-json#optionaldependencies">guidelines</a>, third-party dependencies end up triggering this vulnerability anytime you launch the application.   </p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">Case Studies: Real-World Manifestations</b>  </p>
<p>The Optional Dependency Pattern:
npm supports optional dependencies to be specified in the project’s package.json file. The <a href="https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v11/configuring-npm/package-json#optionaldependencies">recommended pattern</a> for checking for these dependencies is as follows:</p>












































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4d1a598e-31cd-4ced-9047-0e80c6549174/npm-optional-dependency-docs.png" data-image-dimensions="1051x756" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4d1a598e-31cd-4ced-9047-0e80c6549174/npm-optional-dependency-docs.png?format=1000w" width="1051" height="756" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4d1a598e-31cd-4ced-9047-0e80c6549174/npm-optional-dependency-docs.png?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4d1a598e-31cd-4ced-9047-0e80c6549174/npm-optional-dependency-docs.png?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4d1a598e-31cd-4ced-9047-0e80c6549174/npm-optional-dependency-docs.png?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4d1a598e-31cd-4ced-9047-0e80c6549174/npm-optional-dependency-docs.png?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4d1a598e-31cd-4ced-9047-0e80c6549174/npm-optional-dependency-docs.png?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4d1a598e-31cd-4ced-9047-0e80c6549174/npm-optional-dependency-docs.png?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4d1a598e-31cd-4ced-9047-0e80c6549174/npm-optional-dependency-docs.png?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
          
          <figcaption data-sqsp-image-classic-block-caption-container class="image-caption-wrapper">
            <p data-rte-preserve-empty="true"><em>Figure 2: npm Docs showing optionalDependencies example code      </em></p>
          </figcaption>
        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p>This pattern silently catches errors when optional packages are missing, allowing execution to continue. So what’s the problem? On Windows, Node.js will search all the way up to <code>C:\node_modules</code> where an attacker may have planted a malicious replacement. This search behavior mirrors UNIX conventions where <code>/node_modules</code> at the filesystem root is typically only writable by root. Windows systems by default allow any user to create <code>C:\node_modules</code>. Once <code>require</code> is called, Node.js will traverse the search path and execute any matching module it finds.  </p>
<p>Important things to note:  </p>
<ol>
<li>   This pattern can be found in third party libraries deep in a dependency tree, as we will see in the following examples.  </li>
<li>   There is no runtime indication to either the developers or the end users that such a vulnerability exists without looking at the filesystem logs with Procmon.  </li>
<li>   The optional dependency pattern itself would not be dangerous if Node.js did not search for packages in <code>C:\node_modules</code>.</li>
</ol>
<p>Let’s take a deeper look at both cases and see why this is so dangerous.  </p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">Case 1: npm CLI (ZDI-26-043 / ZDI-CAN-25430 / CVE-2026-0775)</b>. </p>
<p>Prior to version 11.2.0, npm CLI used a library called “promise-inflight”, which contained an optional dependency on a package called “bluebird”. </p>












































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/13612d7b-3bf5-4b03-9971-e2bf396590e1/npm-inflight-require.png" data-image-dimensions="926x517" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/13612d7b-3bf5-4b03-9971-e2bf396590e1/npm-inflight-require.png?format=1000w" width="926" height="517" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/13612d7b-3bf5-4b03-9971-e2bf396590e1/npm-inflight-require.png?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/13612d7b-3bf5-4b03-9971-e2bf396590e1/npm-inflight-require.png?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/13612d7b-3bf5-4b03-9971-e2bf396590e1/npm-inflight-require.png?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/13612d7b-3bf5-4b03-9971-e2bf396590e1/npm-inflight-require.png?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/13612d7b-3bf5-4b03-9971-e2bf396590e1/npm-inflight-require.png?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/13612d7b-3bf5-4b03-9971-e2bf396590e1/npm-inflight-require.png?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/13612d7b-3bf5-4b03-9971-e2bf396590e1/npm-inflight-require.png?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
          
          <figcaption data-sqsp-image-classic-block-caption-container class="image-caption-wrapper">
            <p data-rte-preserve-empty="true"><em>Figure 3: npm CLI repo </em><a href="https://github.com/npm/cli/blob/977fd5784f875fdc2e3436ed15c444ddca63e3d7/node_modules/promise-inflight/inflight.js#L6"><em>snippet</em></a><em> </em><a href="https://github.com/npm/cli/blob/977fd5784f875fdc2e3436ed15c444ddca63e3d7/node_modules/promise-inflight/inflight.js#L6"><em>showing</em></a><em> require call for missing bluebird package dependency</em></p>
          </figcaption>
        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p>When Node.js is installed on the system, npm is included by default without the <code>bluebird</code> package.  This vulnerability was introduced when bluebird was removed through a well-intentioned pull request (<a href="https://github.com/npm/cli/pull/1438/changes">https://github.com/npm/cli/pull/1438/changes</a>), demonstrating how easy it is for developers to unknowingly create this attack surface.</p>
<p>We can see Node’s package resolution logic at work in the screenshot below:</p>












































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/055eed5f-eb9e-46d7-be00-3a7c3a11631d/npm-procmon-logs.png" data-image-dimensions="1007x497" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/055eed5f-eb9e-46d7-be00-3a7c3a11631d/npm-procmon-logs.png?format=1000w" width="1007" height="497" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/055eed5f-eb9e-46d7-be00-3a7c3a11631d/npm-procmon-logs.png?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/055eed5f-eb9e-46d7-be00-3a7c3a11631d/npm-procmon-logs.png?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/055eed5f-eb9e-46d7-be00-3a7c3a11631d/npm-procmon-logs.png?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/055eed5f-eb9e-46d7-be00-3a7c3a11631d/npm-procmon-logs.png?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/055eed5f-eb9e-46d7-be00-3a7c3a11631d/npm-procmon-logs.png?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/055eed5f-eb9e-46d7-be00-3a7c3a11631d/npm-procmon-logs.png?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/055eed5f-eb9e-46d7-be00-3a7c3a11631d/npm-procmon-logs.png?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
          
          <figcaption data-sqsp-image-classic-block-caption-container class="image-caption-wrapper">
            <p data-rte-preserve-empty="true"><em>Figure 4: Procmon log showing the package resolution behavior of Node.js via CVE-2026-0775</em></p>
          </figcaption>
        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p>First, the application looks for the <code>bluebird.js</code> package in the Node.js installation directory. Node.js sequentially searches back to the system root until it finds the package. If an attacker has placed <code>C:\node_modules\bluebird.js</code>, the <code>require</code> call will find, read, and execute the malicious payload in the context of any user running npm on the system. </p>
<p>This vulnerability is especially dangerous because it is triggered when many <code>npm *</code> cli commands are used. Common development commands such as <code>npm install</code>, <code>npm –l</code>, and <code>npm prune</code> will all execute the malicious <code>bluebird.js</code>package.</p>
<p><b data-preserve-html-node="true">Case 2: Discord (ZDI-26-040/ ZDI-CAN-27057 / CVE-2026-0776/ UNPATCHED)</b></p>
<p>On April 22, 2025, ZDI received a report for a similar vulnerability in Discord reported by T. Doğa Gelişli. Discord uses the ws WebSocket library, which contains an optional dependency on utf-8-validate for compatibility with older Node.js versions:</p>












































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9dbb1a2-f4fc-4ef1-b1e1-3d69e0c4baa0/Screenshot+2026-04-08+at+10.59.22%E2%80%AFAM.png" data-image-dimensions="1662x798" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9dbb1a2-f4fc-4ef1-b1e1-3d69e0c4baa0/Screenshot+2026-04-08+at+10.59.22%E2%80%AFAM.png?format=1000w" width="1662" height="798" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9dbb1a2-f4fc-4ef1-b1e1-3d69e0c4baa0/Screenshot+2026-04-08+at+10.59.22%E2%80%AFAM.png?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9dbb1a2-f4fc-4ef1-b1e1-3d69e0c4baa0/Screenshot+2026-04-08+at+10.59.22%E2%80%AFAM.png?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9dbb1a2-f4fc-4ef1-b1e1-3d69e0c4baa0/Screenshot+2026-04-08+at+10.59.22%E2%80%AFAM.png?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9dbb1a2-f4fc-4ef1-b1e1-3d69e0c4baa0/Screenshot+2026-04-08+at+10.59.22%E2%80%AFAM.png?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9dbb1a2-f4fc-4ef1-b1e1-3d69e0c4baa0/Screenshot+2026-04-08+at+10.59.22%E2%80%AFAM.png?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9dbb1a2-f4fc-4ef1-b1e1-3d69e0c4baa0/Screenshot+2026-04-08+at+10.59.22%E2%80%AFAM.png?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/e9dbb1a2-f4fc-4ef1-b1e1-3d69e0c4baa0/Screenshot+2026-04-08+at+10.59.22%E2%80%AFAM.png?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
          
          <figcaption data-sqsp-image-classic-block-caption-container class="image-caption-wrapper">
            <p data-rte-preserve-empty="true">Figure 5: websockets library repo snippet showing require call for missing utf-8-validate package dependency</p>
          </figcaption>
        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p>Discord does not ship with the utf-8-validate package. As a result, the following Procmon logs show the same behavior as Case 1. Anytime Discord is launched, the attacker controlled <code>C:\node_modules\utf-8-validate.js</code> is executed.</p>












































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2c563913-8390-46a3-aa48-5dcc755c7d4a/Capture.png" data-image-dimensions="1074x528" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2c563913-8390-46a3-aa48-5dcc755c7d4a/Capture.png?format=1000w" width="1074" height="528" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2c563913-8390-46a3-aa48-5dcc755c7d4a/Capture.png?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2c563913-8390-46a3-aa48-5dcc755c7d4a/Capture.png?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2c563913-8390-46a3-aa48-5dcc755c7d4a/Capture.png?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2c563913-8390-46a3-aa48-5dcc755c7d4a/Capture.png?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2c563913-8390-46a3-aa48-5dcc755c7d4a/Capture.png?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2c563913-8390-46a3-aa48-5dcc755c7d4a/Capture.png?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/2c563913-8390-46a3-aa48-5dcc755c7d4a/Capture.png?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
          
          <figcaption data-sqsp-image-classic-block-caption-container class="image-caption-wrapper">
            <p data-rte-preserve-empty="true">Figure 6: Procmon log showing the package resolution behavior of Node.js via CVE-2026-0776</p>
          </figcaption>
        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  


<p>The ws library does support disabling this check via the <code>WS_NO_UTF_8_VALIDATE</code> environment variable, but this requires the consuming application (Discord) to set it explicitly. Here’s a quick video demonstrating the bug by popping the calc app when opening Discord:</p>


  














  
    
      
    
    
      
        
          
          
        
      
      
      



    
  








  <p class="">Discord automatically opens on login by default, so in practice code execution happens immediately without any user interaction. Strangely, the Discord Security team made it clear to us in their responses that they do not consider local attack vectors as valid security issues. </p><p class=""><strong>The Bigger Picture</strong></p><p class="">The cases above represent only a few of the applications affected by this pattern. During our investigation we found many other independent reports.  These issues in <a href="https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/COMPASS-9058">Mongo DB Compass</a> and <a href="https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/MONGOSH-2028">Mongo DB Shell</a> are just two other examples.</p><p class="">Every Windows application built on Node.js with missing or optional dependencies is potentially vulnerable. This includes desktop applications that utilize Electron as well as popular web frameworks such as Next.js and React.</p><p class="">Each vendor has clearly stated that they will not treat these issues as vulnerabilities: </p><p class="">NPM’s response to our report: </p><p class=""><em>“exploits that require local access to a machine are considered ineligible for npm CLI</em></p><p class="">Discord’s response to our report:</p><p class=""><em>“We do not consider physical/local attacks as valid security issues”</em></p><p class="">Node.js, in the “Examples of non-vulnerabilities” section of their <a href="https://github.com/nodejs/node/security/policy#examples-of-non-vulnerabilities">Security Policy</a>: </p><p class=""><em>“Node.js trusts the file system in the environment accessible to it. Therefore, it is not a vulnerability if it accesses/loads files from any path that is accessible to it.” </em></p><p class=""><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>





















  
  



<p>The vulnerability pattern described in this blog stems from a deliberate design decision by Node.js maintainers. While Node.js's position that “applications should trust their filesystem” may hold true on properly administered UNIX systems, it creates a systemic vulnerability on Windows where low-privileged users can write to <code>C:\node_modules</code>. Without a fix from Node.js, the burden silently falls on application developers.   </p>
<p>Making matters worse, the vulnerable code may not live in the application code itself. The optional dependencies that trigger this behavior could come from third-party libraries buried in the dependency tree as we saw with both Discord and npm CLI. </p>




  <p class="">We encourage security researchers to further review this issue and investigate other applications for this dangerous behavior. You can find us online at <a href="https://x.com/bobbygould5">@bobbygould5</a> and <a href="https://x.com/izobashi">@izobashi</a>, and follow the team on <a href="https://www.twitter.com/thezdi">Twitter</a>, <a href="https://infosec.exchange/@thezdi">Mastodon</a>, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/company/zerodayinitiative">LinkedIn</a>, or <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/thezdi.bsky.social">Bluesky</a> for the latest in exploit techniques and security patches.</p><p class=""> </p><p class="">DISCLOSURE TIMELINES</p><p class=""> </p><p class="">NPM CLI: </p><p class="">2024-11-13 – ZDI submitted the report to the vendor</p><p class="">2024-11-13 – The vendor acknowledged the receipt of the report</p><p class="">2024-11-13 – The vendor communicated that the reported behavior was by design and they do not consider local attacks as valid security issues</p><p class="">2025-08-05 – ZDI encouraged the vendor to re-assess the issue</p><p class="">2025-12-18 – ZDI notified the vendor of the intention to publish the case as a 0-day advisory</p><p class=""> </p><p class="">DISCORD: </p><p class="">2025-07-08 – ZDI notified vendor </p><p class="">2025-09-11 – ZDI followed up with vendor </p><p class="">2025-09-15 – Vendor stated they do not consider local attacks as valid security issues </p><p class="">2025-12-01 – ZDI explained why we believe the issue is still valid </p><p class="">2025-12-10 – Vendor replied that the vulnerability is still out of scope  </p><p class="">2025-12-11 – ZDI informed vendor of intent to publish 0-day  </p><p class="">  </p><p class="">REFERENCES</p><p class=""><a href="https://nodejs.org/api/modules.html#loading-from-node_modules-folders">https://nodejs.org/api/modules.html#loading-from-node_modules-folders</a></p><p class=""><a href="https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v10/configuring-npm/package-json#optionaldependencies">https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v10/configuring-npm/package-json#optionaldependencies</a></p><p class=""><a href="https://groups.google.com/g/nodejs/c/5BGr5dliUIk/m/abJEH3sPymcJ?pli=1">https://groups.google.com/g/nodejs/c/5BGr5dliUIk/m/abJEH3sPymcJ?pli=1</a></p><p class=""><a href="https://github.com/nodejs/node-v0.x-archive/issues/8830">https://github.com/nodejs/node-v0.x-archive/issues/8830</a></p><p class=""><a href="https://bounty.github.com/ineligible.html#vulnerability_in_upstream_dependencies:~:text=eligible%20for%20rewards.-,Local%20access,-Vulnerabilities%20which%20require">https://bounty.github.com/ineligible.html#vulnerability_in_upstream_dependencies:~:text=eligible%20for%20rewards.-,Local%20access,-Vulnerabilities%20which%20require</a></p><p class=""><a href="https://github.com/nodejs/node/security/policy#examples-of-non-vulnerabilities">https://github.com/nodejs/node/security/policy#examples-of-non-vulnerabilities</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The June 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I’ve made it through Pwn2Own Berlin, had a little vacation, and now I’m back for Patch Tuesday. Microsoft and Adobe didn’t disappoint. In fact, they have heralded my return with the largest Patch Tuesday release ever. Thanks? Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694563/hacking/the-june-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694563/hacking/the-june-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I’ve made it through Pwn2Own Berlin, had a little vacation, and now I’m back for Patch Tuesday. Microsoft and Adobe didn’t disappoint. In fact, they have heralded my return with the largest Patch Tuesday release ever. Thanks? Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for June 2026</strong></p><p class="">For June, Adobe released 11 bulletins addressing 123 unique CVEs in Adobe Acrobat Reader, ColdFusion, Experience Manager, Experience Manager Forms, InDesign, InCopy, Substance 3D Sampler, Content Credentials SDK, Dreamweaver, Format Plugins, and Adobe Campaign Classic. A total of 11 of these CVEs were reported through the ZDI program.</p><p class="">Here’s this month’s overview table:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/campaign/apsb26-66.html" target="_blank">APSB26-66</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Campaign Classic</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>10.0</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-64.html" target="_blank">APSB26-64</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>7</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-63.html" target="_blank">APSB26-63</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Acrobat Reader</td>
    <td>20</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/aem-forms/apsb26-57.html" target="_blank">APSB26-57</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager Forms</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dreamweaver/apsb26-62.html" target="_blank">APSB26-62</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Dreamweaver</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/formatplugins/apsb26-65.html" target="_blank">APSB26-65</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Format Plugins</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/incopy/apsb26-59.html" target="_blank">APSB26-59</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InCopy</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/indesign/apsb26-58.html" target="_blank">APSB26-58</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InDesign</td>
    <td>12</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d-sampler/apsb26-60.html" target="_blank">APSB26-60</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Substance 3D Sampler</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/content-authenticity-sdk/apsb26-61.html" target="_blank">APSB26-61</a></td>
    <td>Content Credentials SDK</td>
    <td>8</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.5</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-56.html" target="_blank">APSB26-56</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager</td>
    <td>57</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>5.4</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
  <tr>
    <td>TOTAL</td>
    <td>11 bulletins</td>
    <td>123</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</tfoot>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">Obviously, the update for Campaign Classic should be on the top of your deployment list if you’re a user. A CVSS 10 is rare; two in the same bulletin is pretty much a unicorn. Adobe says there are no active attacks, but I would expect heavy research into creating one. The update for Coldfusion is also a Priority 1, but again, no known attacks is the wild. I suspect the Reader patch will also receive a lot of attention as malicious PDFs are common in ransomware attacks. The update for Experience Manager may be large, but it’s mostly just cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for June 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released a new record 208 CVEs Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Github Copilot, Defender, Exchange Server, Hyper-V, Secure Boot, and BitLocker. At least, that’s my count. Microsoft’s tools seem to be having some issues, as they initially included a CVE from 2020 in this release. Regardless, the count is over 200, and I counted several times.</p><p class="">One of these bugs came through the ZDI program, but bugs submitted during Pwn2Own Berlin remain unpatched. If you include the Chromium and other third-party bugs, the total CVE count for June comes to a staggering 571 CVEs. 38 of these cases are rated Critical while the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">I’ve been counting CVEs on Patch Tuesday since 2017, and this is by far the largest monthly release in that time. The previous record was 177 set last year. It is extraordinary that Microsoft can produce so many patches in a single month, but it does raise concerns. How many of these cases were found using AI tools? How many patches were generated using AI to assist in coding or testing? What quality issues may exist in these patches? And likely most importantly, is this the new normal? The last two months were also large releases. Should sysadmins adjust their processes for prioritization and patch deployment based on this new volume of updates? Unfortunately, Microsoft is not providing those answers right now. Hopefully that changes in the future. BTW – just a note – the current number of CVEs shipped by Microsoft this year exceeds the total number of CVEs shipped in all of 2018.</p><p class="">One of the bugs patched by Microsoft this month is listed as under active exploitation and three others are listed as publicly known at the time of release. Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bug being exploited in the wild.</p><p class="">-   <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41091"><strong>CVE-2026-41091</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>Since Microsoft doesn’t provide info on how widespread exploitation is, we must read some tea leaves. For this patch, several different people were acknowledged, which indicates multiple parties say this is in the wild, meaning exploitation is likely significant. The good news is that most people won’t need to take action as Defender updates itself. However, if you don’t have this configured or are in an isolated environment, you’ll need to update to the latest version.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45657"><strong>CVE-2026-45657</strong></a><strong> - Windows Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This CVSS 9.8 bug allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to execute code at SYSTEM level without user interaction. Yup – this is wormable. The problem lies in the way the kernel handles TCP/IP. This was listed as “Exploitation Less Likely” by Microsoft, but rest assured that every researcher and bug shop on the planet is reversing this patch right now trying to create an exploit. Test and deploy this patch quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47291"><strong>CVE-2026-47291</strong></a><strong> - HTTP.sys Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Our second CVSS 9.8 bug of the month, this also allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to execute code on affected systems without user interaction. However, there is a caveat. Systems using the default MaxRequestBytes registry value used by the Windows HTTP stack are not affected by this bug. You can edit your registry settings if you need protection while you test and deploy the patch. The bulletin includes instructions and even a PowerShell script for doing this action. Microsoft lists this as “Exploitation more likely”, so I would definitely check your registry settings.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44815"><strong>CVE-2026-44815</strong></a><strong> - DHCP Client Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Here’s another CVSS 9.8 that has an odd incongruity. Although the CVSS says no permissions are required for exploitation, the write-up states it must be an “authenticated” user. I would err on the side of caution here and believe the CVSS. If that’s correct, then we have another bug where a remote, unauthenticated attacker could execute code on affected systems without user interaction. And since the DHCP client is on every OS, it’s a juicy target. This is another one to test and deploy with haste.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45585"><strong>CVE-2026-45585</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50507"><strong>CVE-2026-50507</strong></a><strong> - Windows BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability<br></strong>If you’ve followed the ongoing saga of Nightmare Eclipse vs. MSRC, the bugs should look familiar. One is definitely a fix for “YellowKey”, while the other appears to be a fix for “GreenPlasma”. The researcher has promised a “<a href="https://www.theregister.com/security/2026/05/28/microsoft-0-day-feud-escalates-as-researcher-threatens-another-windows-exploit-dump/5248085">bone shattering</a>” drop on June 14, so let’s hope Microsoft is able to reach some understanding with the researcher before more 0-days are released. Also, there is a script provided by Microsoft as a mitigation, but the better strategy is to test and deploy the updates.</p><p class=""> Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for June 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="new2026-Jun-cvrf2.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="1024">
 <col width="144">
 <col width="256">
 <col width="104" span="6">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="144" class="xl65" height="47">CVE</td>
  <td width="256" class="xl65">Title</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Severity</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">CVSS</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Public</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Exploited</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">XI</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Type</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41091"><span>CVE-2026-41091</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Defender
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">0</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49160"><span>CVE-2026-49160</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">HTTP.sys Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50507"><span>CVE-2026-50507</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45586"><span>CVE-2026-45586</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Collaborative
  Translation Framework (CTFMON) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl71">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="91">
  <td class="xl67" height="91"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-10263"><span>CVE-2025-10263 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">ARM: CVE-2025-10263
  Completion of affected memory accesses might not be guaranteed by completion
  of a TLBI [kernel]</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48567"><span>CVE-2026-48567</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure HorizonDB<span>  </span>Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">10</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32193"><span>CVE-2026-32193</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure Kubernetes
  Service (AKS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47644"><span>CVE-2026-47644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Copilot Chat
  (Microsoft Edge) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44815"><span>CVE-2026-44815</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">DHCP Client Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47291"><span>CVE-2026-47291</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">HTTP.sys Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42824"><span>CVE-2026-42824</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">M365 Copilot
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45476"><span>CVE-2026-45476</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Azure
  Network Adapter Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44810"><span>CVE-2026-44810</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft
  Cryptographic Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48579"><span>CVE-2026-48579</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Online Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47655"><span>CVE-2026-47655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Graph
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45497"><span>CVE-2026-45497</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft M365 Copilot
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">N/A</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45460"><span>CVE-2026-45460</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45472"><span>CVE-2026-45472</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45474"><span>CVE-2026-45474</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45461"><span>CVE-2026-45461</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45463"><span>CVE-2026-45463</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45456"><span>CVE-2026-45456</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Outlook and
  Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45458"><span>CVE-2026-45458</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Outlook and
  Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47635"><span>CVE-2026-47635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Outlook and
  Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26142"><span>CVE-2026-26142</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Nuance PowerScribe
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47289"><span>CVE-2026-47289</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47654"><span>CVE-2026-47654</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48563"><span>CVE-2026-48563</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42992"><span>CVE-2026-42992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44799"><span>CVE-2026-44799</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44801"><span>CVE-2026-44801</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42985"><span>CVE-2026-42985</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45648"><span>CVE-2026-45648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42987"><span>CVE-2026-42987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Deployment
  Services (WDS) Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33828"><span>CVE-2026-33828</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Device Health
  Attestation (DHA) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44803"><span>CVE-2026-44803</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44812"><span>CVE-2026-44812</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45607"><span>CVE-2026-45607</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45641"><span>CVE-2026-45641</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47652"><span>CVE-2026-47652</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47288"><span>CVE-2026-47288</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kerberos Key
  Distribution Center (KDC) Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45657"><span>CVE-2026-45657</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48574"><span>CVE-2026-48574</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45490"><span>CVE-2026-45490</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">.NET SDK Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45491"><span>CVE-2026-45491</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">.NET Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45591"><span>CVE-2026-45591</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">ASP.NET Core Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47643"><span>CVE-2026-47643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure Stack Edge
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41098"><span>CVE-2026-41098</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Azure Stack Edge
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45642"><span>CVE-2026-45642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Azure
  Attestation service and Device Health Attestation Service Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45650"><span>CVE-2026-45650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Bing Search
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45637"><span>CVE-2026-45637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45647"><span>CVE-2026-45647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40371"><span>CVE-2026-40371</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Dynamics 365
  (on-premises) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44822"><span>CVE-2026-44822</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45455"><span>CVE-2026-45455</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45469"><span>CVE-2026-45469</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44817"><span>CVE-2026-44817</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44818"><span>CVE-2026-44818</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44820"><span>CVE-2026-44820</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44823"><span>CVE-2026-44823</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45459"><span>CVE-2026-45459</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Excel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45504"><span>CVE-2026-45504</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45502"><span>CVE-2026-45502</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45503"><span>CVE-2026-45503</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45583"><span>CVE-2026-45583</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45500"><span>CVE-2026-45500</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45501"><span>CVE-2026-45501</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47631"><span>CVE-2026-47631</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42986"><span>CVE-2026-42986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Graphics
  Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41092"><span>CVE-2026-41092</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Kinect
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45644"><span>CVE-2026-45644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Live Share
  Canvas SDK Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47293"><span>CVE-2026-47293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Click-To-Run Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45485"><span>CVE-2026-45485</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44821"><span>CVE-2026-44821</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45483"><span>CVE-2026-45483</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Project Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45475"><span>CVE-2026-45475</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44819"><span>CVE-2026-44819</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44824"><span>CVE-2026-44824</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45645"><span>CVE-2026-45645</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49161"><span>CVE-2026-49161</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft PC Manager
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42902"><span>CVE-2026-42902</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft PowerToys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45484"><span>CVE-2026-45484</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45454"><span>CVE-2026-45454</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47298"><span>CVE-2026-47298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45467"><span>CVE-2026-45467</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45468"><span>CVE-2026-45468</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45479"><span>CVE-2026-45479</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45453"><span>CVE-2026-45453</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47636"><span>CVE-2026-47636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47637"><span>CVE-2026-47637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47638"><span>CVE-2026-47638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47639"><span>CVE-2026-47639</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47641"><span>CVE-2026-47641</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33113"><span>CVE-2026-33113</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45462"><span>CVE-2026-45462</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45464"><span>CVE-2026-45464</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45465"><span>CVE-2026-45465</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47634"><span>CVE-2026-47634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47640"><span>CVE-2026-47640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45481"><span>CVE-2026-45481</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48560"><span>CVE-2026-48560</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48562"><span>CVE-2026-48562</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42835"><span>CVE-2026-42835</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Teams for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45606"><span>CVE-2026-45606</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft UxTheme
  Library (uxtheme.dll) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45482"><span>CVE-2026-45482</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Visual
  Studio Code CoPilot Chat Extension Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45466"><span>CVE-2026-45466</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45471"><span>CVE-2026-45471</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45486"><span>CVE-2026-45486</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45643"><span>CVE-2026-45643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45457"><span>CVE-2026-45457</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42980"><span>CVE-2026-42980</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">NT OS Kernel Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42916"><span>CVE-2026-42916</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">NT OS Kernel Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45649"><span>CVE-2026-45649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Office for Android
  Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47653"><span>CVE-2026-47653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42909"><span>CVE-2026-42909</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42913"><span>CVE-2026-42913</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42993"><span>CVE-2026-42993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45588"><span>CVE-2026-45588</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48568"><span>CVE-2026-48568</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48570"><span>CVE-2026-48570</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48573"><span>CVE-2026-48573</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48575"><span>CVE-2026-48575</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48576"><span>CVE-2026-48576</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48578"><span>CVE-2026-48578</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45654"><span>CVE-2026-45654</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45656"><span>CVE-2026-45656</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">UEFI Secure Boot
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-8863"><span>CVE-2026-8863</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">UEFI Secure Boot
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40376"><span>CVE-2026-40376</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47281"><span>CVE-2026-47281</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47284"><span>CVE-2026-47284</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47292"><span>CVE-2026-47292</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  MSSQL Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48569"><span>CVE-2026-48569</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47287"><span>CVE-2026-47287</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Visual Studio Code
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42829"><span>CVE-2026-42829</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Administrator
  Protection Secure Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34335"><span>CVE-2026-34335</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45601"><span>CVE-2026-45601</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45598"><span>CVE-2026-45598</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45596"><span>CVE-2026-45596</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45638"><span>CVE-2026-45638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45603"><span>CVE-2026-45603</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42911"><span>CVE-2026-42911</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45594"><span>CVE-2026-45594</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Application
  Identity (AppID) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45655"><span>CVE-2026-45655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45658"><span>CVE-2026-45658</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45640"><span>CVE-2026-45640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Bluetooth Port
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45605"><span>CVE-2026-45605</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Bluetooth
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47656"><span>CVE-2026-47656</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Boot Manager
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.9</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44809"><span>CVE-2026-44809</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45634"><span>CVE-2026-45634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DHCP Client
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45608"><span>CVE-2026-45608</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DHCP Client
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41108"><span>CVE-2026-41108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42905"><span>CVE-2026-42905</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44811"><span>CVE-2026-44811</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44808"><span>CVE-2026-44808</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44807"><span>CVE-2026-44807</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42983"><span>CVE-2026-42983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44802"><span>CVE-2026-44802</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44813"><span>CVE-2026-44813</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44804"><span>CVE-2026-44804</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48566"><span>CVE-2026-48566</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44814"><span>CVE-2026-44814</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45602"><span>CVE-2026-45602</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Dynamic Host
  Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42836"><span>CVE-2026-42836</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Function
  Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42910"><span>CVE-2026-42910</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hotpatch
  Monitoring Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42972"><span>CVE-2026-42972</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Hyper-V
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45592"><span>CVE-2026-45592</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Internet
  (wininet.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42903"><span>CVE-2026-42903</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kerberos
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42914"><span>CVE-2026-42914</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kerberos
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48583"><span>CVE-2026-48583</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45653"><span>CVE-2026-45653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42984"><span>CVE-2026-42984</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45600"><span>CVE-2026-45600</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45604"><span>CVE-2026-45604</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Managed
  Installer Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45595"><span>CVE-2026-45595</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Mark of the
  Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45636"><span>CVE-2026-45636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50508"><span>CVE-2026-50508</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows NTLM Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48565"><span>CVE-2026-48565</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Narrator
  Braille Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44805"><span>CVE-2026-44805</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Network
  Controller (NC) Host Agent Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42981"><span>CVE-2026-42981</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Performance
  Monitor Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42974"><span>CVE-2026-42974</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Performance
  Monitor Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45487"><span>CVE-2026-45487</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Program
  Compatibility Assistant Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42828"><span>CVE-2026-42828</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42837"><span>CVE-2026-42837</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42969"><span>CVE-2026-42969</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42971"><span>CVE-2026-42971</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42970"><span>CVE-2026-42970</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42973"><span>CVE-2026-42973</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42978"><span>CVE-2026-42978</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42977"><span>CVE-2026-42977</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42979"><span>CVE-2026-42979</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42991"><span>CVE-2026-42991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45639"><span>CVE-2026-45639</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42908"><span>CVE-2026-42908</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45593"><span>CVE-2026-45593</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows SDK Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42906"><span>CVE-2026-42906</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Shell
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42907"><span>CVE-2026-42907</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Shell
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47648"><span>CVE-2026-47648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Storage
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42915"><span>CVE-2026-42915</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows TCP/IP Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42904"><span>CVE-2026-42904</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42968"><span>CVE-2026-42968</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Telephony
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42912"><span>CVE-2026-42912</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Telephony
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45597"><span>CVE-2026-45597</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows UI Automation
  Manager (uiamanager.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">3</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45599"><span>CVE-2026-45599</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows UPnP Device
  Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45635"><span>CVE-2026-45635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows UPnP Device
  Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40409"><span>CVE-2026-40409</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40404"><span>CVE-2026-40404</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">2</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42989"><span>CVE-2026-42989</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl68">Winlogon
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl69">Important</td>
  <td class="xl70">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">1</td>
  <td class="xl70">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="144"></td>
  <td width="256"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this release, the scariest-looking one is actually nothing to concern yourself with at all. The CVSS 10 bug in Azure HorizonDB has already been addressed by Microsoft and is just being documented now. That’s also the case for five others. Of course, there wouldn’t be a release without Office bugs that have the Preview Pane as an attack vector. There are multiple in June. There’s a handful of bugs in the Remote Desktop Client, but these rely on connecting to a malicious RDP server. There are three patches for Hyper-V that allow for guest-to-host code execution. The bug in Active Directory requires authentication, but any authenticated user can hit it. For the Windows Directory Service vulnerability, it needs to be listening for TFTP. You have blocked that everywhere, right? The bug in Azure Network Adapter is somewhat unique as you need to update your Linux kernel to be protected. The bug in Azure Kubernetes allows an attacker to break out of a container and gain control of the AKS worker node. Finally, the bug in the Kerberos Key Distribution Center (KDC) seems unlikely, but if exploited, it could allow authenticated attackers to get code execution on affected systems.</p><p class="">Moving on to the other code execution bugs, there are the ubiquitous open-an-own bugs in Office components like Excel and Word. The code injection bug in Exchange Server looks troubling, but it requires a machine-in-the-middle (MiTM), so exploitation is unlikely. The bugs in SharePoint require authentication, but you should note that the patch applies to both SharePoint Server 2016 and SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016. The two bugs in UPnP are interesting. Both can lead to code execution by causing an error during the handling of specially crafted data, which could lead to a Use After Free (UAF) bug. The bugs in RDP Client all require connecting to a malicious RDP server, but it’s not clear why some are rated Critical and some are rated Important. The NTFS vulnerability requires a user to mount a virtual hard drive on an affected system. The last RCE bug this month is in Azure Stack Edge and requires the attacker to send a specially crafted file upload request that includes a manipulated file name or path, leading to code execution.</p><p class="">There are more than 60 Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs in this month’s release, and as usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. A notable exception is in Exchange Server, where a user on Outlook Web Access (OWA) could gain access to other mailboxes. The bug in Visual Studio Code could allow attackers to gain permissions associated with the MCP Server’s managed identity. The bugs in Windows SDK and Windows UI Automation Manager could let attacker go from low integrity up to medium integrity code execution. The bug in Bluetooth just allows “elevated” privileges without really describing what elevated might be. </p><p class="">Moving on to the more than 20 security feature bypass (SFB) bugs in the June release, there are a total of 10 that impact Secure Boot. All carry scope change (S:C) in the CVSS, meaning successful exploitation affects security boundaries beyond the vulnerable component itself — specifically the ability to load untrusted code at boot, bypass Virtual Secure Mode, and undermine boot integrity guarantees. CVE-2026-45654 explicitly calls out VSM exposure. The bulk of these are credited to Alon Leviev (STORM), which is notable given his prior BootKitty/BlackLotus-adjacent research. The bugs in the Windows Boot Manager have a similar impact as the Secure Boot bugs. The UEFI Secure Boot vulnerabilities go a layer deeper. They require either local admin or physical access but could allow for the running of untrusted code even before the OS loads. Rootkits anyone? The four bugs in BitLocker all require physical access but could yield encrypted data if exploited. The bug in Windows Administration Protection allows attackers to bypass the feature that prevents standard-user apps from performing admin-level actions. The bug in Visual Studio Copilot Chat could be the most interesting non-boot bug here as it allows authentication impersonation. Mark of the Web (MotW) and Excel vulns could bypass user warnings. Lastly, the bug in PC Manager bypasses expected user controls. </p><p class="">Turning our attention to the mass of spoofing bugs in the release, we instantly see 18 impacting SharePoint Server. Fortunately, these are simply cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs. It’s the Exchange bugs we should really watch for. One is an XSS that an attacker can exploit by convincing an Exchange administrator to open a malicious link or message, which then runs code in the admin's web session. That's a meaningful privilege escalation path. Another is listed as an SSRF-based attack, but no other details are available. The last is a lower-impact XSS with limited confidentiality/integrity loss. The bug in Bing Search (remember Bing?) is a classic search result spoofing. The bug in Azure Stack Edge is interesting as it could allow access to resources outside the vulnerable component's security boundary. The bug in Office for Android requires user interaction. The Office Project Server bug is an authenticated XSS with low impact. The final spoofing bug is in Azure Attestation but has already been addressed. You should still verify you are protected by following the instructions in the write-up from Microsoft.</p><p class="">There are 30 different information disclosure bugs in this release, and fortunately, the vast majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. The two bugs in Visual Studio require user interaction and could “disclose information over a network.” How obtuse. The bug in GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code could disclose discloses a sign-in access token for a user's work account. That's a meaningful credential exposure, not just random memory. That leaves the two bugs in Exchange Server. One could allow an authenticated user to gain information about which network services that the Exchange server can reach. The other sounds much like the spoofing bug in OWA as it allows attackers to see information in mailboxes they should not have access to.</p><p class="">I’ve never been a fan of the “tampering” category, as it could mean so many different things. For example, the bug in .NET simply says it could allow an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering locally. Similarly, the bug in Visual Studio says the same, expect here the tampering occurs over a network. Microsoft doesn’t even bother with a CWE for the tampering bug in the DHCP Server, so your guess is as good as mine.</p><p class="">There are seven DoS bugs in the June release, and as usual, Microsoft provides little to no actionable information about the vulnerabilities. The most interesting is the bug in HTTP.sys, which is listed as publicly known. This is an uncontrolled resource consumption, rated "Exploitation More Likely," and publicly disclosed. Since, HTTP.sys sits at the core of IIS and Windows web services, a network-accessible DoS here can take down any Windows server running HTTP-based services. Based on the Acknowledgement, it looks like this bug may have been found using AI. There are no real details for the other bugs, but based simply on the impact, I would focus on the Kerberos and TCP/IP bugs if you had to prioritize.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">The next Patch Tuesday will be on July 14 and will be the last one before Black Hat/DEFCON. It’s usually a big release, so strap in and hang on. I’ll be back then to give you my full thoughts. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p><p class=""> </p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The July 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694560/hacking/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694560/hacking/the-july-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:02:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Hacking</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">Well folks. Here we are. The bug apocalypse has fully descended upon us. I’ll do my best to sort this out in some way meaningful, but this month’s release shows us the nay-sayers were right, and I’ve got to hand it to the nay-sayers here. Excellent call. Take an extended break from your regularly scheduled activities as we let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Adobe has now moved to a bimonthly release schedule, which means they will be releasing patches on the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month. I’ll continue to cover the second Tuesday release here and update this blog should the fourth Tuesday release contain anything significant. I think this is a smart way to break up a monster release into something a bit more manageable. Apple has said they are taking a similar approach. We’ll see if other vendors follow their lead.</p><p class="">For the first part of the July release, Adobe released 12 bulletins addressing 88 unique CVEs in Adobe ColdFusion, Commerce, After Effects, Animate, Audition, Bridge, Creative Cloud Desktop Application, Experience Manager, Illustrator, Media Encoder, Premiere Pro, and the Content Credentials SDK.</p><p class="">Here’s this month’s overview table:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-82.html" target="_blank">APSB26-82</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.9</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-73.html" target="_blank">APSB26-73</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Commerce</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/after_effects/apsb26-78.html" target="_blank">APSB26-78</a></td>
    <td>Adobe After Effects</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/animate/apsb26-83.html" target="_blank">APSB26-83</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Animate</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/audition/apsb26-71.html" target="_blank">APSB26-71</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Audition</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb26-81.html" target="_blank">APSB26-81</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Bridge</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/creative-cloud/apsb26-77.html" target="_blank">APSB26-77</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Creative Cloud Desktop Application</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.1</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-74.html" target="_blank">APSB26-74</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager</td>
    <td>13</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-79.html" target="_blank">APSB26-79</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Illustrator</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/media-encoder/apsb26-72.html" target="_blank">APSB26-72</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Media Encoder</td>
    <td>5</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/premiere_pro/apsb26-76.html" target="_blank">APSB26-76</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Premiere Pro</td>
    <td>4</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/content-authenticity-sdk/apsb26-80.html" target="_blank">APSB26-80</a></td>
    <td>Content Credentials SDK</td>
    <td>12</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.2</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
<tfoot>
  <tr>
    <td>TOTAL</td>
    <td>12 bulletins</td>
    <td>88</td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
    <td></td>
  </tr>
</tfoot>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">While nothing is under active exploit, I would prioritize the Cold Fusion and Commerce patches first. The patch for Cold Fusion even clocks in with a CVSS 9.9 bug. Beyond that, most of these updates are pretty straightforward. If you’re using these products, patch them. However, you can use you regular patch cadence here. </p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for July 2026</strong></p><p class="">Here it is. The Mother of All Releases. To call this record-breaking is an understatement. How to count this mess is anyone’s guess, but I see new Microsoft 621 CVEs for the month of July. Some of these are in online services where no user action is required. They also list about 480 bugs in Chromium and Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) that I won’t cover here. Here’s how I put this in context. I looked at the last 20 years of Microsoft releases. The CVE count year-to-date exceeds all other years’ totals.</p>





















  
  














































  

    
  
    

      

      
        <figure class="
              sqs-block-image-figure
              intrinsic
            ">
          
        
        

        
          
            
              
              
          
            
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                <img data-stretch="false" data-image="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png" data-image-dimensions="2158x1150" data-image-focal-point="0.5,0.5" alt="" data-load="false" elementtiming="system-image-block" data-sqsp-image-classic-block-image src="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w" width="2158" height="1150" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, (max-width: 767px) 100vw, 100vw" onload='this.classList.add("loaded")' srcset="https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=100w 100w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=300w 300w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=500w 500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=750w 750w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1000w 1000w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=1500w 1500w, https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5894c269e4fcb5e65a1ed623/4abf68b8-2f48-439d-8a92-bcc105d7b4f3/Picture1new.png?format=2500w 2500w" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-loader="sqs">

            
          
        
            
          
        

        
      
        </figure>
      

    
  


  





  <p class="">The products covered this month are also astonishing. There are patches for Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, Github Copilot, Defender, Exchange Server, Hyper-V, Ages of Empire II, and Minecraft Server (really!). That phrase “Windows components” does some pretty heavy lifting here, too, as just about everything you’ve ever heard of is getting patched. All told, there are 63 rated Critical, six rated Moderate, one rated Low, with the rest rated Important in severity. Eight of these bugs were submitted through the ZDI program (more on that later). Two CVEs are listed as under active exploit while one other is listed as publicly known.</p><p class="">So how do we eat this elephant? One byte at a time (pun intended). Let’s start by looking a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the bugs being exploited in the wild.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><strong>CVE-2026-56155</strong></a><strong> - Active Directory Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This is one of several AD FS being patched this month, but it’s the only one being actively exploited. It stems from insufficient access-control granularity and does require local access and low privileges to start, but AD FS is exactly the kind of identity infrastructure attackers love to pivot through once they're in. It can also be paired with an RCE as we often see in ransomware. Test and deploy this patch quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56154"><strong>CVE-2026-56164</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>The other bug being exploited in the wild this month is a modest CVSS 5.3 – but it shows why Moderate severity bugs still matter. It's a missing-authentication flaw, meaning an unauthenticated attacker can hit it over the network with no user interaction required. When something this reachable is being actively abused, patch it now and worry about the score later.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><strong>CVE-2026-57092</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Windows VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This patch rates the highest CVSS score for the month: a solid 9.9. It’s a use-after-free that lets a low-privileged attacker escalate to full host compromise across a VM boundary. We saw something like this demonstrated at Pwn2Own Berlin on ESXi, but it clearly isn’t alone. If you’re using VMSwitch in your Hyper-V deployments (and you likely are), test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><strong>CVE-2026-50522</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><strong>58644</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This matching pair of CVSS 9.8 bugs results from the deserialization-of-untrusted-data and are reachable without authentication or user interaction. CVE-2026-50522 was demonstrated during <a href="https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog/2026/5/16/pwn2own-berlin-2026-day-three-results-and-master-of-pwn">Pwn2Own Berlin</a>, so it’s odd to see Microsoft list it as “Exploit Maturity Unknown” since we literally handed them a working exploit. Just another reason to do your own risk assessment and not rely 100% on the vendor. If you have any Internet accessible SharePoint servers, test and deploy this patch quickly. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><strong>CVE-2026-56190</strong></a><strong> - Remote Desktop Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</strong><br> This patch covers an unauthenticated, network-reachable, no user interaction required bug. The root cause is a classic one: use of uninitialized resource (CWE-908), meaning specially crafted RDP traffic can interact with memory that was never properly initialized, letting an attacker corrupt memory and potentially steer code execution. RDP Servers are a common target, so audit your systems to see which are internet accessible and start from there. </p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><strong>CVE-2026-55008</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Exchange Server Spoofing Vulnerability<br></strong>Ignore the title here and treat this like the XSS bug it is. The vulnerability is listed as a CVSS 9.6 since it’s a stored cross-site scripting flaw in Outlook Web Access, with a scope-changed impact that lets it break out of the web app context entirely. An attacker sends a specially crafted email, and if the victim simply opens it in OWA, arbitrary JavaScript executes in their browser session — no attachment needed, no macro warning, just viewing the message does it. If you’re using OWA, test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><strong>CVE-2026-50518</strong></a><strong> - Windows DHCP Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>There are a couple of these DHCP RCE patches in this release, but the other has caveats while this one does not. Both are heap-based buffer overflows scoring CVSS 9.8, both unauthenticated and network-reachable. If you're running DHCP Server role on anything Internet-adjacent (you're not, right?), these move to the top of the list.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><strong>CVE-2026-56188</strong></a><strong> - Windows Server Network driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Another Critical-rated bug, this one is caused by a race condition. It’s always fun to see a TOCTOU bug rated this high, since race conditions are notoriously finicky to exploit reliably. While it may prove tricky to exploit, this bug could allow an attacker to execute privileged code over the network without user interaction. Don’t let the race condition lull you to sleep on a wormable bug.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><strong>CVE-2026-55010</strong></a><strong> - Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>File this in the “why not” category. This bug is a heap-based buffer overflow in Minecraft Bedrock Dedicated Server, also CVSS 9.8 and also unauthenticated RCE. Yes, your kid’s Minecraft server (it is your kid’s server, right?) is exposed to the same class of bug as your DHCP infrastructure. Patch it anyway.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for July 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026-Jul-cvrf.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="920">
 <col width="144">
 <col width="256">
 <col width="104" span="5">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="144" class="xl65" height="47">CVE</td>
  <td width="256" class="xl65">Title</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Severity</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">CVSS</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Public</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Exploited</td>
  <td width="104" class="xl66">Type</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56155"><span>CVE-2026-56155</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56164"><span>CVE-2026-56164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50661"><span>CVE-2026-50661</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows BitLocker
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl70">Yes</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54121"><span>CVE-2026-54121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Certificate Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45499"><span>CVE-2026-45499 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure OpenAI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48564"><span>CVE-2026-48564</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50370"><span>CVE-2026-50370</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56159"><span>CVE-2026-56159</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DHCP Server Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50382"><span>CVE-2026-50382</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41106"><span>CVE-2026-41106 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft 365 Copilot
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26145"><span>CVE-2026-26145 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Azure
  Synapse Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48561"><span>CVE-2026-48561</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Copilot
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55011"><span>CVE-2026-55011</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55012"><span>CVE-2026-55012</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="96">
  <td class="xl67" height="96"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55944"><span>CVE-2026-55944</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Dynamics NAV
  and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (On Premises) Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57100"><span>CVE-2026-57100 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Entra
  Provisioning Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55041"><span>CVE-2026-55041</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54998"><span>CVE-2026-54998 **</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Online Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55008"><span>CVE-2026-55008</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54992"><span>CVE-2026-54992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50314"><span>CVE-2026-50314</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50467"><span>CVE-2026-50467</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55018"><span>CVE-2026-55018</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55022"><span>CVE-2026-55022</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55045"><span>CVE-2026-55045</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55049"><span>CVE-2026-55049</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55129"><span>CVE-2026-55129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55056"><span>CVE-2026-55056</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55140"><span>CVE-2026-55140</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55043"><span>CVE-2026-55043</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55123"><span>CVE-2026-55123</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55120"><span>CVE-2026-55120</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerPoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50522"><span>CVE-2026-50522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58644"><span>CVE-2026-58644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55040"><span>CVE-2026-55040</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54117"><span>CVE-2026-54117</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54118"><span>CVE-2026-54118</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50655"><span>CVE-2026-50655</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56189"><span>CVE-2026-56189</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57090"><span>CVE-2026-57090</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57094"><span>CVE-2026-57094</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57087"><span>CVE-2026-57087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57092"><span>CVE-2026-57092</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  VMSwitch Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55033"><span>CVE-2026-55033</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55127"><span>CVE-2026-55127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55132"><span>CVE-2026-55132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55010"><span>CVE-2026-55010</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Minecraft Bedrock
  Dedicated Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50474"><span>CVE-2026-50474</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49164"><span>CVE-2026-49164</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54128"><span>CVE-2026-54128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50518"><span>CVE-2026-50518</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49796"><span>CVE-2026-49796</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50380"><span>CVE-2026-50380</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54127"><span>CVE-2026-54127</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50680"><span>CVE-2026-50680</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50327"><span>CVE-2026-50327</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58542"><span>CVE-2026-58542</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58608"><span>CVE-2026-58608</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54982"><span>CVE-2026-54982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54995"><span>CVE-2026-54995</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Reliable
  Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42982"><span>CVE-2026-42982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50392"><span>CVE-2026-50392</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Kernel
  Mode Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50694"><span>CVE-2026-50694</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Socket
  Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56188"><span>CVE-2026-56188</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Network
  driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50444"><span>CVE-2026-50444</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54999"><span>CVE-2026-54999</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl72">Critical</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47302"><span>CVE-2026-47302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50525"><span>CVE-2026-50525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50651"><span>CVE-2026-50651</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57108"><span>CVE-2026-57108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Denial of Service
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50524"><span>CVE-2026-50524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50527"><span>CVE-2026-50527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50648"><span>CVE-2026-50648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50650"><span>CVE-2026-50650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50646"><span>CVE-2026-50646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Framework Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50649"><span>CVE-2026-50649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47304"><span>CVE-2026-47304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50528"><span>CVE-2026-50528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Security Feature
  Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50659"><span>CVE-2026-50659</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Spoofing
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50526"><span>CVE-2026-50526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">.NET Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50682"><span>CVE-2026-50682</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55001"><span>CVE-2026-55001</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50647"><span>CVE-2026-50647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50684"><span>CVE-2026-50684</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Active Directory
  Federation Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56170"><span>CVE-2026-56170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47300"><span>CVE-2026-47300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47303"><span>CVE-2026-47303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">ASP.NET Core Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50652"><span>CVE-2026-50652</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50653"><span>CVE-2026-50653</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Active Directory
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57969"><span>CVE-2026-57969</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58279"><span>CVE-2026-58279</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure CycleCloud
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47632"><span>CVE-2026-47632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Monitor Agent
  Metrics Extension Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50338"><span>CVE-2026-50338</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Azure Spring Apps
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50488"><span>CVE-2026-50488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Clipboard User Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50491"><span>CVE-2026-50491</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Code Integrity DLL
  (ci.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50381"><span>CVE-2026-50381</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Composite Image File
  System driver (cimfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50427"><span>CVE-2026-50427</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Content Delivery
  Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50692"><span>CVE-2026-50692</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58633"><span>CVE-2026-58633</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58634"><span>CVE-2026-58634</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Desktop Window Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50296"><span>CVE-2026-50296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50375"><span>CVE-2026-50375</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50353"><span>CVE-2026-50353</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50493"><span>CVE-2026-50493</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56643"><span>CVE-2026-56643</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56644"><span>CVE-2026-56644</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58629"><span>CVE-2026-58629</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DirectX Graphics
  Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49174"><span>CVE-2026-49174</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50495"><span>CVE-2026-50495</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">DNS Client Tampering
  Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57088"><span>CVE-2026-57088</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Extensible Storage
  Engine (ESENT) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50663"><span>CVE-2026-50663</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Game: Age of Empires
  II: Definitive Edition Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47282"><span>CVE-2026-47282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41109"><span>CVE-2026-41109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot and
  Visual Studio Code Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50510"><span>CVE-2026-50510</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">GitHub Copilot Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49787"><span>CVE-2026-49787</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50420"><span>CVE-2026-50420</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP.sys Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49788"><span>CVE-2026-49788</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">HTTP/2 Denial of
  Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50696"><span>CVE-2026-50696</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Internet Key Exchange
  (IKE) Protocol Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58617"><span>CVE-2026-58617</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">M365 Copilot for iOS
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58595"><span>CVE-2026-58595</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Bing App for
  IOS Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49162"><span>CVE-2026-49162</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50305"><span>CVE-2026-50305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50361"><span>CVE-2026-50361</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50466"><span>CVE-2026-50466</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50458"><span>CVE-2026-50458</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Brokering
  File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50658"><span>CVE-2026-50658</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="72">
  <td class="xl67" height="72"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56178"><span>CVE-2026-56178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50657"><span>CVE-2026-50657</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Defender for
  Endpoint for Mac Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50329"><span>CVE-2026-50329</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58541"><span>CVE-2026-58541</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft DWM Core
  Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58596"><span>CVE-2026-58596</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57991"><span>CVE-2026-57991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58291"><span>CVE-2026-58291</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57981"><span>CVE-2026-57981</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57984"><span>CVE-2026-57984</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57985"><span>CVE-2026-57985</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57986"><span>CVE-2026-57986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57988"><span>CVE-2026-57988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57992"><span>CVE-2026-57992</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58276"><span>CVE-2026-58276</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56645"><span>CVE-2026-56645</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57974"><span>CVE-2026-57974</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57975"><span>CVE-2026-57975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58281"><span>CVE-2026-58281</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58284"><span>CVE-2026-58284</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58285"><span>CVE-2026-58285</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58287"><span>CVE-2026-58287</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58288"><span>CVE-2026-58288</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58289"><span>CVE-2026-58289</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58290"><span>CVE-2026-58290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58292"><span>CVE-2026-58292</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58293"><span>CVE-2026-58293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58294"><span>CVE-2026-58294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57983"><span>CVE-2026-57983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58295"><span>CVE-2026-58295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58525"><span>CVE-2026-58525</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57987"><span>CVE-2026-57987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58278"><span>CVE-2026-58278</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56646"><span>CVE-2026-56646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57977"><span>CVE-2026-57977</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57993"><span>CVE-2026-57993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58282"><span>CVE-2026-58282</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58283"><span>CVE-2026-58283</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58286"><span>CVE-2026-58286</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58298"><span>CVE-2026-58298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58524"><span>CVE-2026-58524</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58296"><span>CVE-2026-58296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58297"><span>CVE-2026-58297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58300"><span>CVE-2026-58300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58522"><span>CVE-2026-58522</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58299"><span>CVE-2026-58299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58523"><span>CVE-2026-58523</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge for
  Android Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50678"><span>CVE-2026-50678</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54988"><span>CVE-2026-54988</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48580"><span>CVE-2026-48580</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50408"><span>CVE-2026-50408</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55046"><span>CVE-2026-55046</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55138"><span>CVE-2026-55138</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55054"><span>CVE-2026-55054</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55122"><span>CVE-2026-55122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55898"><span>CVE-2026-55898</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50675"><span>CVE-2026-50675</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55899"><span>CVE-2026-55899</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55948"><span>CVE-2026-55948</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58618"><span>CVE-2026-58618</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47642"><span>CVE-2026-47642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55024"><span>CVE-2026-55024</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55025"><span>CVE-2026-55025</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55031"><span>CVE-2026-55031</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55048"><span>CVE-2026-55048</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55029"><span>CVE-2026-55029</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55039"><span>CVE-2026-55039</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55136"><span>CVE-2026-55136</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55141"><span>CVE-2026-55141</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55036"><span>CVE-2026-55036</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55044"><span>CVE-2026-55044</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55037"><span>CVE-2026-55037</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55058"><span>CVE-2026-55058</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55137"><span>CVE-2026-55137</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55053"><span>CVE-2026-55053</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55131"><span>CVE-2026-55131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54131"><span>CVE-2026-54131</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55947"><span>CVE-2026-55947</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55949"><span>CVE-2026-55949</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56156"><span>CVE-2026-56156</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Excel Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55006"><span>CVE-2026-55006</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55009"><span>CVE-2026-55009</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55005"><span>CVE-2026-55005</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Exchange
  Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56642"><span>CVE-2026-56642</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Fabric Data
  Warehouse Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50343"><span>CVE-2026-50343</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Install
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50439"><span>CVE-2026-50439</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Message
  Queuing Queue Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58537"><span>CVE-2026-58537</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft NAT Helper
  Components (ipnathlp.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56193"><span>CVE-2026-56193</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55023"><span>CVE-2026-55023</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55026"><span>CVE-2026-55026</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55027"><span>CVE-2026-55027</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55028"><span>CVE-2026-55028</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55047"><span>CVE-2026-55047</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55035"><span>CVE-2026-55035</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55057"><span>CVE-2026-55057</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl75" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55121"><span>CVE-2026-55121</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55042"><span>CVE-2026-55042</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55139"><span>CVE-2026-55139</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50665"><span>CVE-2026-50665</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56192"><span>CVE-2026-56192</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56195"><span>CVE-2026-56195</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47290"><span>CVE-2026-47290</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50301"><span>CVE-2026-50301</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55017"><span>CVE-2026-55017</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55125"><span>CVE-2026-55125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Office
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55133"><span>CVE-2026-55133</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft OneNote
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58636"><span>CVE-2026-58636</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50438"><span>CVE-2026-50438</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PC Manager
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58647"><span>CVE-2026-58647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft PowerBI
  Report Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55052"><span>CVE-2026-55052</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58277"><span>CVE-2026-58277</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55051"><span>CVE-2026-55051</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54108"><span>CVE-2026-54108</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55016"><span>CVE-2026-55016</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55019"><span>CVE-2026-55019</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55020"><span>CVE-2026-55020</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55021"><span>CVE-2026-55021</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55030"><span>CVE-2026-55030</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55034"><span>CVE-2026-55034</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55126"><span>CVE-2026-55126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55135"><span>CVE-2026-55135</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56157"><span>CVE-2026-56157</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SharePoint
  Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47296"><span>CVE-2026-47296</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55002"><span>CVE-2026-55002</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47295"><span>CVE-2026-47295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50468"><span>CVE-2026-50468</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54116"><span>CVE-2026-54116</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft SQL Server
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42900"><span>CVE-2026-42900</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49784"><span>CVE-2026-49784</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50356"><span>CVE-2026-50356</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49165"><span>CVE-2026-49165</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows App
  Store Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54993"><span>CVE-2026-54993</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58610"><span>CVE-2026-58610</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Windows
  Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55050"><span>CVE-2026-55050</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55124"><span>CVE-2026-55124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55142"><span>CVE-2026-55142</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55032"><span>CVE-2026-55032</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55055"><span>CVE-2026-55055</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55038"><span>CVE-2026-55038</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55134"><span>CVE-2026-55134</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55128"><span>CVE-2026-55128</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55130"><span>CVE-2026-55130</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Word Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50359"><span>CVE-2026-50359</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Core
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57097"><span>CVE-2026-57097</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft XML Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50346"><span>CVE-2026-50346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Netlogon RPC Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50402"><span>CVE-2026-50402</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">NTFS Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50506"><span>CVE-2026-50506</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45646"><span>CVE-2026-45646</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">OData for ASP.NET and
  ASP.NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54989"><span>CVE-2026-54989</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Quality Windows
  Audio/Video Experience (QWAVE) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50365"><span>CVE-2026-50365</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Access
  Management service/API (RPC server) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54990"><span>CVE-2026-54990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58594"><span>CVE-2026-58594</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop Client
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56190"><span>CVE-2026-56190</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Remote Desktop
  Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49783"><span>CVE-2026-49783</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Secure Boot Security
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42990"><span>CVE-2026-42990</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">SQL Server ODBC driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49168"><span>CVE-2026-49168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Storage Spaces Direct
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48581"><span>CVE-2026-48581</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Surface Broker SDMA
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49180"><span>CVE-2026-49180</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50455"><span>CVE-2026-50455</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Plug and
  Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54111"><span>CVE-2026-54111</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58543"><span>CVE-2026-58543</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Universal Print
  Management Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58601"><span>CVE-2026-58601</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Virtual Hard Disk
  (VHD) Miniport Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulernability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50520"><span>CVE-2026-50520</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45496"><span>CVE-2026-45496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57101"><span>CVE-2026-57101</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57102"><span>CVE-2026-57102</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Code
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-47305"><span>CVE-2026-47305</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Visual Studio Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49805"><span>CVE-2026-49805</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50297"><span>CVE-2026-50297</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50325"><span>CVE-2026-50325</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50489"><span>CVE-2026-50489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57095"><span>CVE-2026-57095</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50416"><span>CVE-2026-50416</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56184"><span>CVE-2026-56184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Win32k Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50432"><span>CVE-2026-50432</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Window Virtual
  Filtering Platform (VFP) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54119"><span>CVE-2026-54119</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57976"><span>CVE-2026-57976</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50366"><span>CVE-2026-50366</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49178"><span>CVE-2026-49178</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Domain Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58529"><span>CVE-2026-58529</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services (ADFS) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54983"><span>CVE-2026-54983</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50695"><span>CVE-2026-50695</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50304"><span>CVE-2026-50304</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50368"><span>CVE-2026-50368</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50324"><span>CVE-2026-50324</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50355"><span>CVE-2026-50355</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50411"><span>CVE-2026-50411</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Active
  Directory Federation Services Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58631"><span>CVE-2026-58631</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56196"><span>CVE-2026-56196</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56197"><span>CVE-2026-56197</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  (WAC) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56169"><span>CVE-2026-56169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57107"><span>CVE-2026-57107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56185"><span>CVE-2026-56185</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Admin Center
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50312"><span>CVE-2026-50312</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50462"><span>CVE-2026-50462</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57093"><span>CVE-2026-57093</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34346"><span>CVE-2026-34346</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Ancillary
  Function Driver for WinSock Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48572"><span>CVE-2026-48572</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-48571"><span>CVE-2026-48571</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50400"><span>CVE-2026-50400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows App Package
  Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50331"><span>CVE-2026-50331</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Application
  Model Core API Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49803"><span>CVE-2026-49803</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows AppX
  Deployment Extensions Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50351"><span>CVE-2026-50351</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio
  Compression Manager (ACM) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50440"><span>CVE-2026-50440</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34328"><span>CVE-2026-34328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Audio Service
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50406"><span>CVE-2026-50406</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Engine
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50364"><span>CVE-2026-50364</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Backup Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-42975"><span>CVE-2026-42975</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth Port
  Driver Remote Code Execution</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58538"><span>CVE-2026-58538</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Bluetooth
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58638"><span>CVE-2026-58638</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Boot Loader
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58637"><span>CVE-2026-58637</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Client-Side
  Caching Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50384"><span>CVE-2026-50384</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clip Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49183"><span>CVE-2026-49183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50689"><span>CVE-2026-50689</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Clipboard
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50374"><span>CVE-2026-50374</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58536"><span>CVE-2026-58536</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58613"><span>CVE-2026-58613</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50401"><span>CVE-2026-50401</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cloud Files
  Mini Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50697"><span>CVE-2026-50697</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50667"><span>CVE-2026-50667</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Common Log
  File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50421"><span>CVE-2026-50421</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Connected User
  Experiences and Telemetry Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50428"><span>CVE-2026-50428</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Container
  Isolation FS Filter Driver (unionfs.sys) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50352"><span>CVE-2026-50352</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50302"><span>CVE-2026-50302</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptographic
  Services Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55144"><span>CVE-2026-55144</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Cryptography
  API: Next Generation (CNG) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50347"><span>CVE-2026-50347</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Data.dll
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49181"><span>CVE-2026-49181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50683"><span>CVE-2026-50683</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58627"><span>CVE-2026-58627</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50685"><span>CVE-2026-50685</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DHCP Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49807"><span>CVE-2026-49807</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DirectX
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49175"><span>CVE-2026-49175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50487"><span>CVE-2026-50487</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50465"><span>CVE-2026-50465</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Client
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49169"><span>CVE-2026-49169</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50426"><span>CVE-2026-50426</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DNS Server
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50424"><span>CVE-2026-50424</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Domain
  Controller Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50300"><span>CVE-2026-50300</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50437"><span>CVE-2026-50437</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows DWM Core
  Library Information Disclosure<span> 
  </span>Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34348"><span>CVE-2026-34348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50502"><span>CVE-2026-50502</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Event Logging
  Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33842"><span>CVE-2026-33842</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40422"><span>CVE-2026-40422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-41087"><span>CVE-2026-41087</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50473"><span>CVE-2026-50473</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50442"><span>CVE-2026-50442</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50389"><span>CVE-2026-50389</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50456"><span>CVE-2026-50456</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57084"><span>CVE-2026-57084</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File Explorer
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57091"><span>CVE-2026-57091</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows File History
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50405"><span>CVE-2026-50405</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Filtering
  Platform Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49172"><span>CVE-2026-49172</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows FTP Service
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50387"><span>CVE-2026-50387</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54122"><span>CVE-2026-54122</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows GDI+ Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50483"><span>CVE-2026-50483</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58609"><span>CVE-2026-58609</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Graphics
  Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50391"><span>CVE-2026-50391</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Group Policy
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50310"><span>CVE-2026-50310</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Human
  Interface Device Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50485"><span>CVE-2026-50485</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V Denial
  of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54129"><span>CVE-2026-54129</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Hyper-V
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50315"><span>CVE-2026-50315</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Image
  Acquisition Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58534"><span>CVE-2026-58534</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Input Method
  Editor (IME) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50490"><span>CVE-2026-50490</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58540"><span>CVE-2026-58540</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Installer
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50425"><span>CVE-2026-50425</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal
  System User Profile Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50293"><span>CVE-2026-50293</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Internal Task
  Bar Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49167"><span>CVE-2026-49167</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49173"><span>CVE-2026-49173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54132"><span>CVE-2026-54132</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49795"><span>CVE-2026-49795</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49798"><span>CVE-2026-49798</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49808"><span>CVE-2026-49808</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50354"><span>CVE-2026-50354</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50332"><span>CVE-2026-50332</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50377"><span>CVE-2026-50377</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50390"><span>CVE-2026-50390</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50423"><span>CVE-2026-50423</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50397"><span>CVE-2026-50397</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50436"><span>CVE-2026-50436</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50399"><span>CVE-2026-50399</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50459"><span>CVE-2026-50459</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50477"><span>CVE-2026-50477</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50478"><span>CVE-2026-50478</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50484"><span>CVE-2026-50484</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50673"><span>CVE-2026-50673</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58532"><span>CVE-2026-58532</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50294"><span>CVE-2026-50294</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50316"><span>CVE-2026-50316</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50419"><span>CVE-2026-50419</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">3.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50463"><span>CVE-2026-50463</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50475"><span>CVE-2026-50475</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50429"><span>CVE-2026-50429</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58614"><span>CVE-2026-58614</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58545"><span>CVE-2026-58545</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58602"><span>CVE-2026-58602</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50393"><span>CVE-2026-50393</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50396"><span>CVE-2026-50396</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Kernel-Mode
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50378"><span>CVE-2026-50378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50303"><span>CVE-2026-50303</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Key Guard
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40378"><span>CVE-2026-40378</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49799"><span>CVE-2026-49799</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Local Security
  Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50371"><span>CVE-2026-50371</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows LUA File
  Virtualization Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58544"><span>CVE-2026-58544</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Management
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50404"><span>CVE-2026-50404</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50358"><span>CVE-2026-50358</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50336"><span>CVE-2026-50336</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50398"><span>CVE-2026-50398</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50414"><span>CVE-2026-50414</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50379"><span>CVE-2026-50379</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50433"><span>CVE-2026-50433</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50676"><span>CVE-2026-50676</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50677"><span>CVE-2026-50677</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-34349"><span>CVE-2026-34349</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50394"><span>CVE-2026-50394</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50415"><span>CVE-2026-50415</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57083"><span>CVE-2026-57083</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Media Photo
  Codec Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54115"><span>CVE-2026-54115</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing (MSMQ) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50447"><span>CVE-2026-50447</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50505"><span>CVE-2026-50505</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Message
  Queuing Service (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50342"><span>CVE-2026-50342</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56183"><span>CVE-2026-56183</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56187"><span>CVE-2026-56187</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows MIDI Service
  Module Elevation of Privileges Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58635"><span>CVE-2026-58635</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Narrator
  Braille Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50500"><span>CVE-2026-50500</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Netlogon
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50476"><span>CVE-2026-50476</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50450"><span>CVE-2026-50450</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Connections Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56650"><span>CVE-2026-56650</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56649"><span>CVE-2026-56649</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network File
  System Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50470"><span>CVE-2026-50470</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50496"><span>CVE-2026-50496</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network Policy
  Server SNMP Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56194"><span>CVE-2026-56194</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56648"><span>CVE-2026-56648</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NFS Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50337"><span>CVE-2026-50337</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Notification
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49789"><span>CVE-2026-49789</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50412"><span>CVE-2026-50412</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50422"><span>CVE-2026-50422</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50672"><span>CVE-2026-50672</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56175"><span>CVE-2026-56175</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56182"><span>CVE-2026-56182</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50341"><span>CVE-2026-50341</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58640"><span>CVE-2026-58640</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49184"><span>CVE-2026-49184</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49797"><span>CVE-2026-49797</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50308"><span>CVE-2026-50308</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50386"><span>CVE-2026-50386</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50309"><span>CVE-2026-50309</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50313"><span>CVE-2026-50313</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50388"><span>CVE-2026-50388</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50448"><span>CVE-2026-50448</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50471"><span>CVE-2026-50471</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50461"><span>CVE-2026-50461</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50417"><span>CVE-2026-50417</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50482"><span>CVE-2026-50482</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50494"><span>CVE-2026-50494</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows NTFS Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50344"><span>CVE-2026-50344</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50686"><span>CVE-2026-50686</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows OLE Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50335"><span>CVE-2026-50335</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50317"><span>CVE-2026-50317</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Operating
  Systems Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54987"><span>CVE-2026-54987</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50435"><span>CVE-2026-50435</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50409"><span>CVE-2026-50409</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Overlay Filter
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-40400"><span>CVE-2026-40400</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows PowerShell
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49166"><span>CVE-2026-49166</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55004"><span>CVE-2026-55004</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print
  Configuration Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50499"><span>CVE-2026-50499</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50383"><span>CVE-2026-50383</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57085"><span>CVE-2026-57085</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Print Spooler
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50469"><span>CVE-2026-50469</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Projected File
  System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50434"><span>CVE-2026-50434</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50339"><span>CVE-2026-50339</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50430"><span>CVE-2026-50430</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50334"><span>CVE-2026-50334</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notification Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44800"><span>CVE-2026-44800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50363"><span>CVE-2026-50363</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Push
  Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50431"><span>CVE-2026-50431</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Quality of
  Service (QoS) Packet Scheduler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50372"><span>CVE-2026-50372</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Redirected
  Drive Buffering System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50666"><span>CVE-2026-50666</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56647"><span>CVE-2026-56647</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Access
  Service Infrastructure Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50330"><span>CVE-2026-50330</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50376"><span>CVE-2026-50376</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50504"><span>CVE-2026-50504</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58533"><span>CVE-2026-58533</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58535"><span>CVE-2026-58535</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58546"><span>CVE-2026-58546</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58539"><span>CVE-2026-58539</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Client Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55003"><span>CVE-2026-55003</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57979"><span>CVE-2026-57979</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50445"><span>CVE-2026-50445</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50497"><span>CVE-2026-50497</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54126"><span>CVE-2026-54126</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57982"><span>CVE-2026-57982</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50369"><span>CVE-2026-50369</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58626"><span>CVE-2026-58626</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Desktop
  Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55014"><span>CVE-2026-55014</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Remote Help
  Defense Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50318"><span>CVE-2026-50318</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50407"><span>CVE-2026-50407</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50357"><span>CVE-2026-50357</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50441"><span>CVE-2026-50441</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50668"><span>CVE-2026-50668</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54109"><span>CVE-2026-54109</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49792"><span>CVE-2026-49792</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49793"><span>CVE-2026-49793</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50362"><span>CVE-2026-50362</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50492"><span>CVE-2026-50492</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50501"><span>CVE-2026-50501</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58530"><span>CVE-2026-58530</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Resilient File
  System (ReFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49791"><span>CVE-2026-49791</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50451"><span>CVE-2026-50451</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57096"><span>CVE-2026-57096</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Routing and
  Remote Access Service (RRAS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50323"><span>CVE-2026-50323</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50452"><span>CVE-2026-50452</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50348"><span>CVE-2026-50348</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50345"><span>CVE-2026-50345</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50322"><span>CVE-2026-50322</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50340"><span>CVE-2026-50340</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50410"><span>CVE-2026-50410</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50449"><span>CVE-2026-50449</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50460"><span>CVE-2026-50460</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50403"><span>CVE-2026-50403</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50385"><span>CVE-2026-50385</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50413"><span>CVE-2026-50413</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50457"><span>CVE-2026-50457</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50486"><span>CVE-2026-50486</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50503"><span>CVE-2026-50503</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54125"><span>CVE-2026-54125</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58527"><span>CVE-2026-58527</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50373"><span>CVE-2026-50373</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50679"><span>CVE-2026-50679</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Search Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-44806"><span>CVE-2026-44806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50681"><span>CVE-2026-50681</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56186"><span>CVE-2026-56186</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Secure Channel
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50367"><span>CVE-2026-50367</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58619"><span>CVE-2026-58619</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Sensor Data
  Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50311"><span>CVE-2026-50311</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50328"><span>CVE-2026-50328</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Server Update
  Service (WSUS) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58531"><span>CVE-2026-58531</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54997"><span>CVE-2026-54997</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49801"><span>CVE-2026-49801</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50690"><span>CVE-2026-50690</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56168"><span>CVE-2026-56168</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50360"><span>CVE-2026-50360</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57089"><span>CVE-2026-57089</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows SMB Server
  Network Transport Driver (srvnet.sys) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50333"><span>CVE-2026-50333</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50298"><span>CVE-2026-50298</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Spaceport.sys
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49171"><span>CVE-2026-49171</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Speech Runtime
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49170"><span>CVE-2026-49170</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows
  StateRepository API Server file Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58526"><span>CVE-2026-58526</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50299"><span>CVE-2026-50299</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Storage Spaces
  Direct Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57968"><span>CVE-2026-57968</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-57973"><span>CVE-2026-57973</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Subsystem for
  Linux (WSL2) Kernel Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50418"><span>CVE-2026-50418</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows System Secure
  Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50306"><span>CVE-2026-50306</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50307"><span>CVE-2026-50307</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49177"><span>CVE-2026-49177</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows TCP/IP
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50669"><span>CVE-2026-50669</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Telephony
  Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54124"><span>CVE-2026-54124</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Terminal
  Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50350"><span>CVE-2026-50350</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Trusted
  Runtime Interface Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50326"><span>CVE-2026-50326</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Unified
  Consent System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49790"><span>CVE-2026-49790</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50498"><span>CVE-2026-50498</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Disk
  Format File System Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58547"><span>CVE-2026-58547</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Universal Plug
  and Play (UPnP) Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49794"><span>CVE-2026-49794</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50453"><span>CVE-2026-50453</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.1</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58528"><span>CVE-2026-58528</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Audio
  Class Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50321"><span>CVE-2026-50321</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50479"><span>CVE-2026-50479</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Hub Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55000"><span>CVE-2026-55000</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54991"><span>CVE-2026-54991</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54996"><span>CVE-2026-54996</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49802"><span>CVE-2026-49802</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49806"><span>CVE-2026-49806</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50674"><span>CVE-2026-50674</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Print
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49804"><span>CVE-2026-49804</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows USB Video
  Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.6</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50454"><span>CVE-2026-50454</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows User Interface
  Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49176"><span>CVE-2026-49176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WalletService
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-49800"><span>CVE-2026-49800</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50480"><span>CVE-2026-50480</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Web Proxy
  Auto-Discovery Protocol (WPAD) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56173"><span>CVE-2026-56173</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows WebView
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58632"><span>CVE-2026-58632</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32 Kernel
  Subsystem Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54107"><span>CVE-2026-54107</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54986"><span>CVE-2026-54986</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54112"><span>CVE-2026-54112</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-54114"><span>CVE-2026-54114</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50670"><span>CVE-2026-50670</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50688"><span>CVE-2026-50688</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50687"><span>CVE-2026-50687</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56176"><span>CVE-2026-56176</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Win32k
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58628"><span>CVE-2026-58628</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Wireless
  Network Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50295"><span>CVE-2026-50295</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Zero Trust DNS
  Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl67" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50509"><span>CVE-2026-50509</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Wireless Wide Area
  Network Service (WwanSvc) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl68">Important</td>
  <td class="xl69">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55945"><span>CVE-2026-55945</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.2</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45488"><span>CVE-2026-45488</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">5.4</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-45489"><span>CVE-2026-45489</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft Edge
  (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl67" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-55145"><span>CVE-2026-55145</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Outlook Copilot
  Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">6.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Tampering</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="73">
  <td class="xl67" height="73"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-56181"><span>CVE-2026-56181</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Windows Network
  Address Translation (NAT) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl71">Moderate</td>
  <td class="xl69">8.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="48">
  <td class="xl67" height="48"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-58597"><span>CVE-2026-58597</span></a></td>
  <td width="256" class="xl74">Microsoft
  Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl73">Low</td>
  <td class="xl69">4.3</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">No</td>
  <td class="xl69">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="144"></td>
  <td width="256"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
  <td width="104"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>** Indicates this CVEs has already been resolved by Microsoft, and no further action is needed by the end user.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">I’ll do my best to summarize everything else in this release, but no promises. I’m only human after all.</p><p class=""> </p><p class="">Looking at the remaining Critical-rated patches, Office is its own weather system: fourteen Word/Excel/PowerPoint/Office RCEs clustered at CVSS 7.8, plus five Windows Media Foundation RCEs. Outside of the Preview Pane attack vector, they are individually unremarkable; collectively, patch Office and reboot. Always reboot. We’ve already mentioned DHCP some, but DHCP Server can't catch a break. Beyond the one already covered, add CVE-2026-56159, CVE-2026-48564, CVE-2026-50370, and DHCP Client cousin CVE-2026-54128. Five DHCP RCEs in one release. Rounding things out, Print Spooler (CVE-2026-58608), Windows TCP/IP (CVE-2026-54999), and a SQL Server RCE pair (CVE-2026-54117/54118) all receive patches, and all are rated a CVSS 8.8. VE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem RCE, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair; it’s unauthenticated, network-reachable, and easy to overlook since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-48561 (Microsoft Copilot RCE, 9.6) and CVE-2026-50380 (Windows GDI+ RCE, 9.6) round out the near-top tier. Don't forget CVE-2026-55040, a SharePoint Security Feature Bypass (9.1) — patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product family. Identity and infrastructure get hit too: CVE-2026-54121 (AD Certificate Services EoP, 8.8) and CVE-2026-50444 (WSUS EoP, 8.8). The obscure Reliable Multicast Transport Driver (RMCAST) takes two RCEs (CVE-2026-54982, CVE-2026-54995), and CVE-2026-50474 gives Remote Desktop Client its own RCE, separate from the RDP one already covered. The rest is a long tail: Defender RCE x2, GDI+ again, Windows Media x2, Secure Kernel Mode EoP x2, and a second Hyper-V EoP. You can consider these “normal” as far as patch cadence goes.</p><p class="">That leaves us with 95 RCE to discuss. I would explain, but there is too much, so let me sum up. CVE-2026-55944 (Dynamics NAV/Business Central On-Prem, 9.8) is the same deserialization flavor as the SharePoint pair: unauthenticated, easy to miss since it's not SharePoint. CVE-2026-54990 (Remote Desktop Client), CVE-2026-49172 (Windows FTP Service), and CVE-2026-50447 (MSMQ) all hit 9.8 too, proof severity labels lag CVSS sometimes. CVE-2026-48561 (Copilot) and CVE-2026-50380 (GDI+) sit at 9.6.</p><p class="">The pattern worth watching: 14 Windows NTFS and 7 ReFS RCEs/ That makes 21 filesystem-driver bugs, an unusually large cluster suggesting a shared root cause. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes 21 more that are genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not Chromium re-listing noise. Remote Desktop Client racks up a second and third RCE (CVE-2026-50474, CVE-2026-58594), and Windows Admin Center picks up two (CVE-2026-56196/56197) — WAC exposure keeps creeping into these releases. Exchange Server (CVE-2026-55005) and AD Domain Services (CVE-2026-49178) both land at 8.8.</p><p class="">And because this release wouldn't be complete without it: CVE-2026-50663, an RCE in Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition. Yes, really. Patch your civilization anyway.</p><p class="">There are close to 260 EoP bugs in this month’s release. Microsoft could have just published the EoPs and still had a record-setting month. As usual, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. What’s really frustrating is that 94 have no explicit privilege statement at all. Microsoft just says “elevate privileges” with no detail. By my count, that leaves around 25 bugs to consider. Some don’t elevate at all. The FAQ literally says the attacker just gets “the rights of the user running the affected application.” That covers Win32k, Clip Service, Search Service, MSMQ, and SharePoint. A few get a Low-to-Medium integrity bump. There are also a couple that lead to downgraded service accounts or arbitrary file deletion, but nothing else I’ve seen really stands out too much.</p><p class="">There are 20 Security Feature Bypass (SFB) bugs this month, and it's a genuinely mixed bag. CVE-2026-55040 leads at Critical, CVSS 9.1 as it’s weak authentication in SharePoint Server. Patch it in the same pass as the SharePoint RCE pair since it's the same product. The AI-coding-tool trend continues: GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code and Visual Studio all land SFB bugs, mostly injection or path-traversal flavored. BitLocker is this month's lone publicly disclosed bug. It’s not exploited yet, but public disclosure is a countdown clock, not a free pass. It requires physical access, as does the bug in Microsoft XML. The firmware/boot cluster is worth a second look: Secure Boot, Boot Loader, and Key Guard all touch the trust chain below the OS. Meaning, despite a low CVSS score, “if this fails, nothing above it can be trusted” stakes. Rounding out the SFB patches, there are two .NET SFBs, two Windows Kernel SFBs, and a DNS/Cryptographic Services bringing up the rear.</p><p class="">The July release includes 31Spoofing bugs this month, and we’ve already covered the most important (Exchange). SharePoint Server accounts for another ten with almost all the same root cause: stored XSS letting an authenticated attacker spoof content in the browser. Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) contributes fifteen more spanning access-control failures, SSRF, type confusion, and UI misrepresentation. All genuinely Microsoft's to patch, not re-listed Chromium noise. The remaining six round out the usual suspects: a Windows NAT spoofing bug reachable from an adjacent network, a Bing app flaw on iOS, a PowerBI Report Server XSS issue, a .NET output-encoding bug, and an AD FS spoofing flaw. None publicly disclosed, none exploited, but with SharePoint's history this year, don't let "just Spoofing" lull you into deprioritizing the patch cycle.</p><p class="">Of 111 Information Disclosure bugs, the overwhelming majority of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. GitHub Copilot is the standout. Here, the bug insufficiently protected credentials, meaning actual secrets leak, not memory scraps. The Windows Admin Center flaw discloses data via improper authentication. A management console leaking to an unauthorized party is a bigger deal than it sounds. SharePoint uses SSRF to pull data server-side, and the Event Logging Service is a protection-mechanism failure, not a memory bug at all. Edge picks up three genuinely file-system-flavored disclosures — improper authorization, files/directories accessible to external parties, and link-following — plus Edge for Android exposing “private personal information” twice and two path-traversal bugs. The remaining 40+ are mostly one-line “exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor” entries scattered across File Explorer, Push Notifications, Cryptographic Services, and Win32k.</p><p class="">Only 8 Tampering bugs this month, the smallest bucket, but a couple stand out. The top of the list is a WSUS bug, caused by an uncaught exception that lets an unauthenticated attacker tamper with the update service over the network. That’s your patch-management infrastructure itself being the target, which always deserves extra attention. Windows CNG (the crypto API) picks up a missing-cryptographic-step flaw, and Windows DNS Client shows up three separate times across the list, twice for improper access control and once for missing authentication on a critical function. DNS resolution having this many tampering paths in one release is worth flagging as a pattern rather than three unrelated bugs. The one genuinely different entry is Outlook Copilot, described simply as vulnerable to “malicious uses” enabling tampering over the network. That’s a fantastically vague phrasing for an AI-assistant feature, continuing this year's running theme of Copilot-branded features showing up somewhere in every release. Finally, a .NET link-following bug and a WSL2 kernel race condition receive patches. Both require local/authorized access to trigger.</p><p class="">Still with me? Good, because we have 35 DoS bugs to cover, and this is really an identity-infrastructure story more than a grab-bag. Active Directory Federation Services alone accounts for seven of them, all sitting at CVSS 7.5, all stack-based buffer overflows or infinite loops that let an unauthenticated attacker knock the service over the network.  The .NET ecosystem is the other big cluster: .NET, .NET Framework, and ASP.NET Core/OData contribute nine bugs combined, almost all “allocation of resources without limits or throttling”.  HTTP.sys and HTTP/2 pick up the same flavor. LSASS shows up twice, which is always worth a second look given what that process actually holds. Rounding out the list are patches for Windows DHCP Server, SMB Server, Secure Channel, Hyper-V, and IKE Protocol each take a single hit, mostly requiring authorized or adjacent-network access rather than being wide open to the internet.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">The next Patch Tuesday will be on August 11, just after Hacker Summer Camp in sunny Las Vegas. Should I survive the heat, I’ll be back then to give you my full thoughts on the release – no matter how large it may be. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The March 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I am back in the friendly confines of the Mid-South headquarters of TrendAI ZDI (a.k.a. my home office), and am all set for the third patch Tuesday of 2026. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.If you’d...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694472/it-security-nachrichten/the-march-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694472/it-security-nachrichten/the-march-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">I am back in the friendly confines of the Mid-South headquarters of TrendAI ZDI (a.k.a. my home office), and am all set for the third patch Tuesday of 2026. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft.If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for March 2026</strong></p><p class="">For March, Adobe released eight bulletins addressing 80 unique CVEs in Adobe Acrobat Reader, Commerce, Illustrator, Substance 3D Painter, Premier Pro, Experience Manager, Substance 3D Stager, and the Adobe DNG Software Development Kit (SDK). Two of these bugs were submitted through the TrendAI ZDI program. If you need to prioritize, the update for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-26.html">Acrobat</a> likely has the most impact, with the patch fixing two Critical-rated and one Important bugs. The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/experience-manager/apsb26-24.html">Experience Manager</a> is the largest this month with 33 CVEs addressed. However, these are simple cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs, so it’s not too exciting. The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/magento/apsb26-05.html">Commerce</a> is also quite large with 19 CVEs. Most of these are also XSS bugs, but there’s a few security feature bypass bugs in there, too. Adobe actually gives this patch a deployment priority of 2, but it’s not under active attack at the time of release. </p><p class="">The fix for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-18.html">Illustrator</a> corrects seven bugs, including a few Critical-rated ones. The patch for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_painter/apsb26-25.html">Substance 3D Painter</a> fixes nine different CVEs, all rated Important. That’s not the case for <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/substance3d_stager/apsb26-29.html">Substance 3D Stager</a>, which fixes six different Critical bugs that could lead to arbitrary code execution. The patch for the <a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dng-sdk/apsb26-30.html">Adobe DNG Software Development Kit</a> (SDK) addresses one Critical and one Important bug. Finally, the update for Premiere Pro correct a single, Critical-rated bug that could lead to arbitrary code execution. </p><p class="">None of the bugs fixed by Adobe this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release, and beyond the update for Commerce, all of the other updates released by Adobe this month are listed as deployment priority 3.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for March 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released 84 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, SQL Server, Hyper-V Server, and the Windows Resilient File System (ReFS). Counting the third-party and Chromium updates listed in the release, it brings to total number of CVEs to 94. Five of these bugs were reported through the TrendAI ZDI program. Eight of these bugs are rated Critical, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">This volume is relatively typical for a March release, and the lack of bugs under active attack is a nice change from last month. There are two vulnerabilities listed as publicly known at the time of release, but none listed as actively exploited.</p><p class="">Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with a bug with an AI slant:</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26144"><strong>CVE-2026-26144</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability<br></strong>This is a fascinating bug and an attack scenario we’re likely to see more often. The vulnerability is a simple cross-site scripting (XSS) bug in Excel, but an attacker could use it to cause the Copilot Agent to exfiltrate data off the target. This essentially makes it a zero-click information disclosure. Although not stated, the disclosure is likely at the level of the logged-on user, so there isn’t a privilege escalation component. Info disclosures rarely get rated Critical, but it makes sense here.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26110"><strong>CVE-2026-26110</strong></a><strong>/</strong><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26113"><strong>CVE-2026-26113</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability <br></strong>Another month and another pair of Office bugs where the Preview Pane is an exploit vector. I’ve lost count of how many of these bugs have been patched over the last year, but it’s just a matter of time until they start appearing in active exploits. The latest versions of Outlook allow you to hide the Preview Pane, but it isn’t clear if this would mitigate these attacks. The best option is still to test and deploy the update, but considering how many of these patches exist, it’s likely further updates will be needed to fully address these issues.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23669"><strong>CVE-2026-23669</strong></a><strong> - Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Just reading the title makes me twitch with remembrances of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PrintNightmare">Print Nightmare</a> from a few years ago. This bug works in the same manner as those exploits. An authenticated attacker sends specially crafted messages to an affected system to gain arbitrary code execution. No user interaction is required. Let’s hope we don’t end up in a new nightmare of spooler exploits. Test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23668"><strong>CVE-2026-23668</strong></a><strong> - Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This vulnerability was submitted to the ZDI program by Marcin Wiązowski as two separate bugs, and it demonstrates the need for variant investigations when creating security patches. Both cases are caused by the lack of proper locking when performing operations on an object. However, in one case, it’s in the cdd.dll driver while the other is in the win32kfull driver. Either way, an attacker could use these to elevate privileges to SYSTEM and execute arbitrary code. Since the fix for both is to add object locking to the GDI object, the cases are combined into a single CVE. That’s not a problem, but it does show how variants can occur, and fixes should be as broad as possible.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for March 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    





<link rel="File-List" href="2026_PatchTable-March.fld/filelist.xml">













<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="953">
 <col width="151" class="xl65">
 <col width="263" class="xl66">
 <col width="111" class="xl67" span="4">
 <col width="95" class="xl67">
 <col width="645" class="xl65">
 <tr height="47">
  <td width="151" class="xl65" height="47"><span> </span>CVE<span> </span></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Title<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Severity<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>CVSS<span> </span></td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Public</td>
  <td width="111" class="xl67"><span> </span>Exploited<span> </span></td>
  <td width="95" class="xl67"><span> </span>Type<span> </span></td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26127"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26127<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>.NET Denial of Service Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21262"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21262<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl68"><span> </span>Yes<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23651"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23651<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26124"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26124<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26122"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26122<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft ACI Confidential Containers
  Information Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21536"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-21536<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Devices Pricing Program Remote
  Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">9.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26144"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26144<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26110"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26110<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26113"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26113<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26125"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26125<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Payment Orchestrator Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.6</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26131"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26131<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>.NET Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25177"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25177<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Active Directory Domain Services Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26117"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26117<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Arc Enabled Servers - Azure Connected
  Machine Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26130"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26130<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>ASP.NET Core Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23661"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23661<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23662"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23662<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23664"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23664<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IoT Explorer Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26121"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26121<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure IOT Explorer Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26118"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26118<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Azure MCP Server Tools Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23667"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23667<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Broadcast DVR Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25190"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25190<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GDI Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25181"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25181<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GDI+ Information Disclosure
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="97">
  <td class="xl72" height="97"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26030"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26030 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GitHub: CVE-2026-26030 Microsoft Semantic
  Kernel InMemoryVectorStore filter functionality vulnerable<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">9.9</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23654"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23654 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>GitHub: Zero Shot SCFoundation Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26141"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26141<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Hybrid Worker Extension (Arc-enabled Windows
  VMs) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23665"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23665 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Linux Azure Diagnostic extension (LAD)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23674"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23674<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>MapUrlToZone Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26123"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26123<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Authenticator Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26148"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26148 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Azure AD SSH Login extension for
  Linux Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25167"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25167<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26107"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26107<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26108"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26108<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26109"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26109<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.4</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26112"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26112<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26134"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26134<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft Office Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26106"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26106<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26114"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26114<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26105"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26105<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.1</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24283"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24283<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Multiple UNC Provider Kernel Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25165"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25165<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Performance Counters for Windows Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24282"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24282<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Push message Routing Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26115"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26115<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26116"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26116<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20967"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-20967<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24285"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24285<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Win32k Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24291"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24291<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Accessibility Infrastructure
  (ATBroker.exe) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25186"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25186<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Accessibility Infrastructure
  (ATBroker.exe) Information Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23660"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23660 †</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Admin Center in Azure Portal
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24293"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24293<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25176"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25176<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25178"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25178<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25179"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25179<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for
  WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23656"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23656<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows App Installer Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.9</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25171"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25171<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Authentication Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23671"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23671<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Bluetooth RFCOM Protocol Driver
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24292"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24292<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Connected Devices Platform Service
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24295"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24295<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Device Association Service Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24296"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24296<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Device Association Service Elevation
  of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25189"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25189<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows DWM Core Library Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25174"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25174<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Extensible File Allocation Table
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25168"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25168<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25169"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25169<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Denial of Service
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.2</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">DoS</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23668"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23668<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25180"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25180<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Graphics Component Information
  Disclosure Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Info</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25170"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25170<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Hyper-V Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24297"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24297<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kerberos Security Feature Bypass
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.5</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">SFB</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24287"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24287<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24289"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24289<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26132"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26132<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24288"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24288<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Mobile Broadband Driver Remote Code
  Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">6.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25175"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25175<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23669"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23669<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24290"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24290<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Projected File System Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23673"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23673<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Resilient File System (ReFS)
  Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25172"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25172<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25173"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25173<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26111"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26111<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Routing and Remote Access Service
  (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25185"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25185<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Shell Link Processing Spoofing
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">5.3</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">Spoofing</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-24294"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-24294<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26128"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-26128<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows SMB Server Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25166"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25166<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows System Image Manager Assessment and
  Deployment Kit (ADK) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25188"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25188<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Telephony Service Elevation of
  Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">8.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23672"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-23672<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Windows Universal Disk Format File System
  Driver (UDFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25187"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-25187<span> </span></span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Winlogon Elevation of Privilege
  Vulnerability<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl70"><span> </span>Important<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">7.8</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">EoP</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3536"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3536 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3536 Integer overflow in
  ANGLE<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3538"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3538 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3538 Integer overflow in
  Skia<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl71"><span> </span>Critical<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3539"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3539 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3539 Object lifecycle
  issue in DevTools<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3540"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3540 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3540 Inappropriate
  implementation in WebAudio<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3541"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3541 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3541 Inappropriate
  implementation in CSS<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3542"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3542 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3542 Inappropriate
  implementation in WebAssembly<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3543"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3543 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3543 Inappropriate
  implementation in V8<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="47">
  <td class="xl72" height="47"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3544"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3544 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3544 Heap buffer overflow
  in WebCodecs<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 <tr height="69">
  <td class="xl72" height="69"><a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-3545"><span><span> </span>CVE-2026-3545 *</span></a></td>
  <td width="263" class="xl66"><span> </span>Chromium: CVE-2026-3545 Insufficient data
  validation in Navigation<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl69"><span> </span>High</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>N/A</td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67"><span> </span>No<span> </span></td>
  <td class="xl67">RCE</td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![if supportMisalignedColumns]&gt;
 <tr height="0">
  <td width="151"></td>
  <td width="263"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="111"></td>
  <td width="95"></td>
 </tr>
 &lt;![endif]&gt;
</table>











  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this month’s release, they are all cloud-native and require no user action. Microsoft has already remediated the vulnerabilities.</p><p class="">Moving on to the other code execution bugs, the vulnerabilities in SharePoint Server pop out first. Both require authentication, but it’s essentially the lowest level of authentication, so these would be ideal cases for lateral movement within an enterprise. There are the standard open-and-own cases within Office components. There an interesting sounding bug in the Windows Mobile Broadband Driver that requires physical access, but Microsoft doesn’t elaborate on the attack scenario beyond that fact. The bug in the System Image Manager Assessment and Deployment Kit (ADK) requires authentication. The bug in GDI requires user interaction. The remaining code execution bugs are in the RRAS protocol. We’ve seen bugs in this component in the past, but never in the wild. I wouldn’t ignore these, but I wouldn’t rush them out either.</p><p class="">Similar to last month, updates for Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs make up nearly half of this month’s release. And as we saw last month, but most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges. The bugs in SQL Server allow attackers to elevate to SQL sysadmin privileges. The bug in the Azure MCP Server is more complex. It allows attackers to obtain the permissions associated with the MCP Server’s managed identity, which lets them perform actions that the managed identity is able to reach. The bug in the Azure AD SSH Login extension for Linux leads to root access, and it won’t be easy to patch. You’ll need to run the update instructions from the command line on each affected system. That’s the same case for the bug in the Linux Azure Diagnostic extension (LAD). There’s an odd bug in the Hybrid Worker Extension (Arc‑enabled Windows VMs) that leads to “ELEVATED” privileges, which is something I’ve never seen before. The bug in the Broadcast DVR component allows an attacker to go from low integrity level up to medium. There’s a bug listed as an EoP in the Push message Routing Service, but reading the description, Microsoft notes it could lead to an information disclosure. It’s likely this is an error and should be an Information Disclosure bug. The final EoP is in the Azure Portal Windows Admin Center and leads to SYSTEM. However, there’s no patch to remediate this bug. Instead, you need to install the latest version of the Windows Admin Center extension through the Azure Portal by hand. </p><p class="">There are two security feature bypass patches in the March release. The first is a bypass of the MapURLToZone method, which (as expected) allows attackers to bypass MapURLToZone protections. The third bypass is in Kerberos and could allow an attacker to either view some sensitive information or make changes to “disclosed” information. This is a race condition that occurs while the group policy is being reapplied, so the window to exploit this would be extremely small.</p><p class="">Looking at the remaining info disclosure bugs getting patched this month, only two result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. Ther others provide more interesting results. There are three bugs in the Azure IoT Explorer have some wide-ranging implications. According to Microsoft, exploitation could result in, “device connection information, authentication tokens, request data, file paths, and other information transmitted between the application and the IoT Hub.” The bug in Authenticator almost reads like a security feature bypass, as exploit results in the disclosure of a one‑time sign‑in code or authentication deep link. The attacker would receive the sign‑in information and could potentially use it to authenticate as the user, allowing access to information or services available to that account. The last info disclosure bug is in the Accessibility Infrastructure and allows an attacker to gain secrets or privileged information belonging to the user of the affected application.</p><p class="">There are only four spoofing bugs in the March release. The first is in SharePoint server and manifests as an XSS. The second bug is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the Azure IoT Explorer. The remaining two are a bit more cryptic. The bug in Windows Shell Link Processing results from the “exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor,” and could lead to spoofing. That sounds like credential exposure, but it’s not explicitly called out. The final spoofing bug results from the insufficient verification of data authenticity in Windows App Installer. Again, this sounds vaguely like credential reflection, but without further information, we can only speculate. </p><p class="">Finally, there are four denial-of-service (DoS) bugs in the release, including one that’s listed as publicly known in the .NET Framework. As usual, Microsoft provides no actionable information about these bugs.</p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">I plan on being at RSA for the first time in my career, so if you’re around, please stop by and say hello. I like it when people say hello. Otherwise, I’ll be back on April 14 with my assessment of that patch Tuesday release. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The April 2026 Security Update Review]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[It’s time once again for Patch Tuesday, and this one is huge. We’ve also got multiple exploits in the wild, which adds another layer of urgency to this month’s release. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities, and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Micro...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694470/it-security-nachrichten/the-april-2026-security-update-review/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694470/it-security-nachrichten/the-april-2026-security-update-review/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="">It’s time once again for Patch Tuesday, and this one is huge. We’ve also got multiple exploits in the wild, which adds another layer of urgency to this month’s release. Take a break from your regularly scheduled activities, and let’s take a look at the latest security patches from Adobe and Microsoft. If you’d rather watch the full video recap covering the entire release, you can check it out here:</p>





















  
  




  
















  
    
      
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
    



  






  <p class=""><strong>Adobe Patches for April 2026</strong></p><p class="">For April, Adobe released 12 bulletins addressing 61 unique CVEs in Adobe Acrobat Reader, InDesign, InCopy, FrameMaker, Connect, ColdFusion, Bridge, Photoshop, Illustrator, Experience Manager Screens, and the Adobe DNG SDK. Three of the Cold Fusion bugs came through the TrendAI ZDI program. For this month, I’m introducing an Adobe table as well. I’d love to get your feedback on whether this is helpful.</p>





















  
  




  


  
    


<table>
<colgroup>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
  <col>
</colgroup>
<thead>
  <tr>
    <th>Bulletin ID</th>
    <th>Product</th>
    <th>CVE Count</th>
    <th>Highest Severity</th>
    <th>Highest CVSS</th>
    <th>Exploited</th>
    <th>Deployment Priority</th>
  </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-43.html" target="_blank">APSB26-43</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Acrobat Reader</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>Yes</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/acrobat/apsb26-44.html" target="_blank">APSB26-44</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Acrobat Reader</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>2</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/indesign/apsb26-32.html" target="_blank">APSB26-32</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InDesign</td>
    <td>9</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/incopy/apsb26-33.html" target="_blank">APSB26-33</a></td>
    <td>Adobe InCopy</td>
    <td>2</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/framemaker/apsb26-36.html" target="_blank">APSB26-36</a></td>
    <td>Adobe FrameMaker</td>
    <td>11</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>8.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/connect/apsb26-37.html" target="_blank">APSB26-37</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Connect</td>
    <td>9</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.6</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb26-38.html" target="_blank">APSB26-38</a></td>
    <td>Adobe ColdFusion</td>
    <td>7</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>9.3</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>1</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/bridge/apsb26-39.html" target="_blank">APSB26-39</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Bridge</td>
    <td>6</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/photoshop/apsb26-40.html" target="_blank">APSB26-40</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Photoshop</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/illustrator/apsb26-42.html" target="_blank">APSB26-42</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Illustrator</td>
    <td>1</td>
    <td>Critical</td>
    <td>7.8</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/aem-screens/apsb26-34.html" target="_blank">APSB26-34</a></td>
    <td>Adobe Experience Manager Screens</td>
    <td>9</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>5.4</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a href="https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/dng-sdk/apsb26-41.html" target="_blank">APSB26-41</a></td>
    <td>Adobe DNG SDK</td>
    <td>3</td>
    <td>Important</td>
    <td>5.5</td>
    <td>No</td>
    <td>3</td>
  </tr>
</tbody>
</table>



  
  









  <p class="">Obviously, the active attack in Reader is the highest priority for this month, but don’t ignore the second bunch of Reader patches. Cold Fusion also gets a deployment priority of 1, so if you’re still running that platform, make sure you get the update. Otherwise, the FrameMaker and Connect patches fix 11 and nine bugs, respectively. InDesign and Experience Manager Screens also have nine CVEs addressed. </p><p class="">Outside of the Reader bug, none of the other bugs fixed by Adobe this month are listed as publicly known or under active attack at the time of release. One of the Reader bugs and Cold Fusion have a deployment priority of one, the other Reader bug has a priority of two, while all of the other updates released by Adobe this month are listed as deployment priority 3.</p><p class=""><strong>Microsoft Patches for April 2026</strong></p><p class="">This month, Microsoft released a monstrous 163 new CVEs in Windows and Windows components, Office and Office Components, Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based), Azure, .NET and Visual Studio, SQL Server, Hyper-V Server, BitLocker, and the Windows Wallet Service. Counting the third-party and a huge Chromium release, it brings the total number of CVEs to a staggering 247 updates. Six of these bugs were reported through the TrendAI ZDI program. Eight of these bugs are rated Critical, two are rated as Moderate, and the rest are rated Important in severity.</p><p class="">By my count, this is the second-largest monthly release in Microsoft’s history. There are many things we could speculate on to justify the size, but if Microsoft is like the other programs out there (including ours), they are likely seeing a rise in submissions found by AI tools. For us, our incoming rate has essentially tripled, making triage a challenge, to say the least. Whatever the reason, we have a lot of bugs to deal with this month. I should also point out that the Pwn2Own Berlin occurs next month, and it’s typical for vendors to patch as much as they can before the event.</p><p class="">There is one Microsoft bug listed as under active attack at the time of release, and one other that’s publicly known. Let’s take a closer look at some of the more interesting updates for this month, starting with the vulnerability being exploited in the wild:</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32201" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-32201</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability<br></strong>Microsoft doesn’t provide a lot of information about this bug, but Spoofing bugs in SharePoint often manifest as cross-site scripting (XSS) bugs. They do note that attackers could view information or make changes to disclosed information. As always, they don’t provide any information on how widespread these attacks are, but I wouldn’t wait to test and deploy this fix – especially if you have internet-connected SharePoint servers.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33825" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-33825</strong></a><strong> - Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability<br></strong>This bug is listed as publicly known, and this time, we know exactly <a href="https://deadeclipse666.blogspot.com/2026/04/public-disclosure.html" target="_blank">where</a> it was disclosed. There have been some questions about how exploitable this bug may be, but it does look like it’s a real problem – just with some reliability issues in its current state. I won’t add on to the commentary from the researcher about working with Microsoft. I’m just glad they are offering a fix for the vulnerability. If you rely on Defender, test and deploy this one quickly.</p><p class="">-   <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33827" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-33827</strong></a><strong> - Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>This vulnerability allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to exploit code on affected systems without user interaction. That adds up to a wormable bug – at least on systems with IPv6 and IPSec enabled. It is a race condition, which sets exploitability to High on the CVSS scale, but we see race conditions exploited at Pwn2Own all the time, so don’t rely on that obstacle. If you’re running IPv6, I would test and deploy this fix quickly before public exploits become available.</p><p class="">-    <a href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33824" target="_blank"><strong>CVE-2026-33824</strong></a><strong> - Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Service Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability<br></strong>Speaking of wormable bugs, here’s our second one this month. By the title, we can tell that systems with IKE enabled are affected, but that leaves plenty of targets for attackers. Microsoft also notes a significant mitigation for this bug. Blocking UDP ports 500 and 4500 at the perimeter prevents external attackers from reaching the affected service. However, insiders could still target this for lateral movement within an enterprise. For enterprises using IKE, get this fix tested and deployed with haste.</p><p class="">Here’s the full list of CVEs released by Microsoft for April 2026:</p>





















  
  




  


  
    




<title>April 2026 Patch Tuesday</title>



<table>
<thead><tr>
  <th>CVE</th>
  <th>Title</th>
  <th>Severity</th>
  <th>CVSS</th>
  <th>Public</th>
  <th>Exploited</th>
  <th>Type</th>
</tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32201">CVE-2026-32201</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Yes</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5281">CVE-2026-5281 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5281 Use after free in Dawn</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Yes</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33825">CVE-2026-33825</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Defender Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>Yes</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23666">CVE-2026-23666</a></td>
  <td>.NET Framework Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32190">CVE-2026-32190</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33114">CVE-2026-33114</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33115">CVE-2026-33115</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32157">CVE-2026-32157</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33826">CVE-2026-33826</a></td>
  <td>Windows Active Directory Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33824">CVE-2026-33824</a></td>
  <td>Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Service Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>9.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33827">CVE-2026-33827</a></td>
  <td>Windows TCP/IP Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>8.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26171">CVE-2026-26171</a></td>
  <td>.NET Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32226">CVE-2026-32226</a></td>
  <td>.NET Framework Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.9</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32178">CVE-2026-32178</a></td>
  <td>.NET Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32203">CVE-2026-32203</a></td>
  <td>.NET and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33116">CVE-2026-33116</a></td>
  <td>.NET, .NET Framework, and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2023-20585">CVE-2023-20585 *</a></td>
  <td>AMD: CVE-2023-20585 IOMMU Write Buffer Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32072">CVE-2026-32072</a></td>
  <td>Active Directory Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.2</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25184">CVE-2026-25184</a></td>
  <td>Applocker Filter Driver (applockerfltr.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32171">CVE-2026-32171</a></td>
  <td>Azure Logic Apps Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32168">CVE-2026-32168</a></td>
  <td>Azure Monitor Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32192">CVE-2026-32192</a></td>
  <td>Azure Monitor Agent Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32181">CVE-2026-32181</a></td>
  <td>Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27924">CVE-2026-27924</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32152">CVE-2026-32152</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32154">CVE-2026-32154</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27923">CVE-2026-27923</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32155">CVE-2026-32155</a></td>
  <td>Desktop Window Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23653">CVE-2026-23653</a></td>
  <td>GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Code Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32631">CVE-2026-23653 *</a></td>
  <td> GitHub: CVE-2026-32631 'git clone' from manipulated repositories can leak NTLM hashes </td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33096">CVE-2026-33096</a></td>
  <td>HTTP.sys Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-25250">CVE-2026-25250 *</a></td>
  <td>MITRE: CVE-2026-25250 Secure Boot disable Eazy Fix</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26181">CVE-2026-26181</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32219">CVE-2026-32219</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32091">CVE-2026-32091</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Brokering File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26152">CVE-2026-26152</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Cryptographic Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33103">CVE-2026-33103</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Dynamics 365 (On-Premises) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32188">CVE-2026-32188</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32189">CVE-2026-32189</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32197">CVE-2026-32197</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32198">CVE-2026-32198</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32199">CVE-2026-32199</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32184">CVE-2026-32184</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft High Performance Compute (HPC) Pack Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26155">CVE-2026-26155</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Local Security Authority Subsystem Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27914">CVE-2026-27914</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Management Console Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26149">CVE-2026-26149</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Power Apps Security Feature Bypass</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>9</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32200">CVE-2026-32200</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft PowerPoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26143">CVE-2026-26143</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft PowerShell Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33120">CVE-2026-33120 †</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20945">CVE-2026-20945</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33822">CVE-2026-33822</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33095">CVE-2026-33095</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23657">CVE-2026-23657</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32081">CVE-2026-32081</a></td>
  <td>Package Catalog Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26170">CVE-2026-26170</a></td>
  <td>PowerShell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26183">CVE-2026-26183</a></td>
  <td>Remote Access Management service/API (RPC server) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26160">CVE-2026-26160</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Licensing Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26159">CVE-2026-26159</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Licensing Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26151">CVE-2026-26151</a></td>
  <td>Remote Desktop Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32085">CVE-2026-32085</a></td>
  <td>Remote Procedure Call Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32167">CVE-2026-32167</a></td>
  <td>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32176">CVE-2026-32176</a></td>
  <td>SQL Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-0390">CVE-2026-0390</a></td>
  <td>UEFI Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32220">CVE-2026-32220</a></td>
  <td>UEFI Secure Boot Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32212">CVE-2026-32212</a></td>
  <td>Universal Plug and Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32214">CVE-2026-32214</a></td>
  <td>Universal Plug and Play (upnp.dll) Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32079">CVE-2026-32079</a></td>
  <td>Web Account Manager Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33104">CVE-2026-33104</a></td>
  <td>Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32196">CVE-2026-32196</a></td>
  <td>Windows Admin Center Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26178">CVE-2026-26178</a></td>
  <td>Windows Advanced Rasterization Platform Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32073">CVE-2026-32073</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26168">CVE-2026-26168</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26173">CVE-2026-26173</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26177">CVE-2026-26177</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26182">CVE-2026-26182</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27922">CVE-2026-27922</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33099">CVE-2026-33099</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33100">CVE-2026-33100</a></td>
  <td>Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32088">CVE-2026-32088</a></td>
  <td>Windows Biometric Service Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27913">CVE-2026-27913</a></td>
  <td>Windows BitLocker Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26175">CVE-2026-26175</a></td>
  <td>Windows Boot Manager Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32162">CVE-2026-32162</a></td>
  <td>Windows COM Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20806">CVE-2026-20806</a></td>
  <td>Windows COM Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26176">CVE-2026-26176</a></td>
  <td>Windows Client Side Caching driver (csc.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27926">CVE-2026-27926</a></td>
  <td>Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32070">CVE-2026-32070</a></td>
  <td>Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33098">CVE-2026-33098</a></td>
  <td>Windows Container Isolation FS Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26153">CVE-2026-26153</a></td>
  <td>Windows Encrypted File System (EFS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32087">CVE-2026-32087</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32093">CVE-2026-32093</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32086">CVE-2026-32086</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32150">CVE-2026-32150</a></td>
  <td>Windows Function Discovery Service (fdwsd.dll) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27931">CVE-2026-27931</a></td>
  <td>Windows GDI Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27930">CVE-2026-27930</a></td>
  <td>Windows GDI Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32221">CVE-2026-32221</a></td>
  <td>Windows Graphics Component Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27906">CVE-2026-27906</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hello Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27928">CVE-2026-27928</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hello Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26156">CVE-2026-26156</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32149">CVE-2026-32149</a></td>
  <td>Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27910">CVE-2026-27910</a></td>
  <td>Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27912">CVE-2026-27912</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kerberos Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26179">CVE-2026-26179</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26180">CVE-2026-26180</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32195">CVE-2026-32195</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26163">CVE-2026-26163</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32215">CVE-2026-32215</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32217">CVE-2026-32217</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32218">CVE-2026-32218</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26169">CVE-2026-26169</a></td>
  <td>Windows Kernel Memory Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.1</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27929">CVE-2026-27929</a></td>
  <td>Windows LUA File Virtualization Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32071">CVE-2026-32071</a></td>
  <td>Windows Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20930">CVE-2026-20930</a></td>
  <td>Windows Management Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26162">CVE-2026-26162</a></td>
  <td>Windows OLE Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33101">CVE-2026-33101</a></td>
  <td>Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32084">CVE-2026-32084</a></td>
  <td>Windows Print Spooler Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27927">CVE-2026-27927</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26184">CVE-2026-26184</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32069">CVE-2026-32069</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32074">CVE-2026-32074</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32078">CVE-2026-32078</a></td>
  <td>Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26167">CVE-2026-26167</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32158">CVE-2026-32158</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32159">CVE-2026-32159</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32160">CVE-2026-32160</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26172">CVE-2026-26172</a></td>
  <td>Windows Push Notifications Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-20928">CVE-2026-20928</a></td>
  <td>Windows Recovery Environment Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.6</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32216">CVE-2026-32216</a></td>
  <td>Windows Redirected Drive Buffering System Denial of Service Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>DoS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27909">CVE-2026-27909</a></td>
  <td>Windows Search Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26161">CVE-2026-26161</a></td>
  <td>Windows Sensor Data Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26174">CVE-2026-26174</a></td>
  <td>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32224">CVE-2026-32224</a></td>
  <td>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26154">CVE-2026-26154</a></td>
  <td>Windows Server Update Service (WSUS) Tampering Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Tampering</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26165">CVE-2026-26165</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-26166">CVE-2026-26166</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27918">CVE-2026-27918</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32151">CVE-2026-32151</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32225">CVE-2026-32225</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>8.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32202">CVE-2026-32202</a></td>
  <td>Windows Shell Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>4.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32082">CVE-2026-32082</a></td>
  <td>Windows Simple Search and Discovery Protocol (SSDP) Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32083">CVE-2026-32083</a></td>
  <td>Windows Simple Search and Discovery Protocol (SSDP) Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32068">CVE-2026-32068</a></td>
  <td>Windows Simple Search and Discovery Protocol (SSDP) Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32183">CVE-2026-32183</a></td>
  <td>Windows Snipping Tool Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32089">CVE-2026-32089</a></td>
  <td>Windows Speech Brokered Api Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32090">CVE-2026-32090</a></td>
  <td>Windows Speech Brokered Api Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32153">CVE-2026-32153</a></td>
  <td>Windows Speech Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27907">CVE-2026-27907</a></td>
  <td>Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32076">CVE-2026-32076</a></td>
  <td>Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27908">CVE-2026-27908</a></td>
  <td>Windows TDI Translation Driver (tdx.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27921">CVE-2026-27921</a></td>
  <td>Windows TDI Translation Driver (tdx.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27915">CVE-2026-27915</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27919">CVE-2026-27919</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32075">CVE-2026-32075</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27916">CVE-2026-27916</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27920">CVE-2026-27920</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32077">CVE-2026-32077</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27925">CVE-2026-27925</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Information Disclosure Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32156">CVE-2026-32156</a></td>
  <td>Windows UPnP Device Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32223">CVE-2026-32223</a></td>
  <td>Windows USB Printing Stack (usbprint.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>6.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32165">CVE-2026-32165</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27911">CVE-2026-27911</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32163">CVE-2026-32163</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32164">CVE-2026-32164</a></td>
  <td>Windows User Interface Core Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-23670">CVE-2026-23670</a></td>
  <td>Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>5.7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-27917">CVE-2026-27917</a></td>
  <td>Windows WFP NDIS Lightweight Filter Driver (wfplwfs.sys) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32080">CVE-2026-32080</a></td>
  <td>Windows WalletService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-32222">CVE-2026-32222</a></td>
  <td>Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Important</td>
  <td>7.8</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>EoP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-21637">CVE-2026-21637 *</a></td>
  <td> HackerOne: CVE-2026-21637 TLS PSK/ALPN Callback Exceptions Bypass Error Handlers</td>
  <td> Moderate</td>
  <td>7.5</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33119">CVE-2026-33119</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) for Android Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Moderate</td>
  <td>5.4</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33829">CVE-2026-33829</a></td>
  <td>Windows Snipping Tool Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Moderate</td>
  <td>4.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5858">CVE-2026-5858 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5858 Heap buffer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5859">CVE-2026-5859 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5859 Integer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>Critical</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5272">CVE-2026-5272 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5272 Heap buffer overflow in GPU</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5273">CVE-2026-5273 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5273 Use after free in CSS</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5274">CVE-2026-5274 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5274 Integer overflow in Codecs</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5275">CVE-2026-5275 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5275 Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5276">CVE-2026-5276 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5276 Insufficient policy enforcement in WebUSB</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5277">CVE-2026-5277 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5277 Integer overflow in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5279">CVE-2026-5279 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5279 Object corruption in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5280">CVE-2026-5280 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5280 Use after free in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5283">CVE-2026-5283 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5283 Inappropriate implementation in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5284">CVE-2026-5284 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5284 Use after free in Dawn</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5285">CVE-2026-5285 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5285 Use after free in WebGL</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5286">CVE-2026-5286 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5286 Use after free in Dawn</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5287">CVE-2026-5287 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5287 Use after free in PDF</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5289">CVE-2026-5289 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5289 Use after free in Navigation</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5290">CVE-2026-5290 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5290 Use after free in Compositing</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5860">CVE-2026-5860 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5860 Use after free in WebRTC</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5861">CVE-2026-5861 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5861 Use after free in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5862">CVE-2026-5862 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5862 Inappropriate implementation in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5863">CVE-2026-5863 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5863 Inappropriate implementation in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5864">CVE-2026-5864 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5864 Heap buffer overflow in WebAudio</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5865">CVE-2026-5865 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5865 Type Confusion in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5866">CVE-2026-5866 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5866 Use after free in Media</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5867">CVE-2026-5867 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5867 Heap buffer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5868">CVE-2026-5868 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5868 Heap buffer overflow in ANGLE</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5869">CVE-2026-5869 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5869 Heap buffer overflow in WebML</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5870">CVE-2026-5870 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5870 Integer overflow in Skia</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5871">CVE-2026-5871 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5871 Type Confusion in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5872">CVE-2026-5872 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5872 Use after free in Blink</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5873">CVE-2026-5873 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5873 Out of bounds read and write in V8</td>
  <td>High</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5291">CVE-2026-5291 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5291 Inappropriate implementation in WebGL</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5292">CVE-2026-5292 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5292 Out of bounds read in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5874">CVE-2026-5874 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5874 Use after free in PrivateAI</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5875">CVE-2026-5875 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5875 Policy bypass in Blink</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5876">CVE-2026-5876 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5876 Side-channel information leakage in Navigation</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5877">CVE-2026-5877 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5877 Use after free in Navigation</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5878">CVE-2026-5878 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5878 Incorrect security UI in Blink</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5879">CVE-2026-5879 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5879 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5880">CVE-2026-5880 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5880 Incorrect security UI in browser UI</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5881">CVE-2026-5881 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5881 Policy bypass in LocalNetworkAccess</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5882">CVE-2026-5882 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5882 Incorrect security UI in Fullscreen</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5883">CVE-2026-5883 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5883 Use after free in Media</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5884">CVE-2026-5884 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5884 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Media</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5885">CVE-2026-5885 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5885 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebML</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5886">CVE-2026-5886 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5886 Out of bounds read in WebAudio</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5887">CVE-2026-5887 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5887 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Downloads</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5888">CVE-2026-5888 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5888 Uninitialized Use in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5889">CVE-2026-5889 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5889 Cryptographic Flaw in PDFium</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5890">CVE-2026-5890 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5890 Race in WebCodecs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5891">CVE-2026-5891 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5891 Insufficient policy enforcement in browser UI</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5892">CVE-2026-5892 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5892 Insufficient policy enforcement in PWAs</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5893">CVE-2026-5893 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5893 Race in V8</td>
  <td>Medium</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5894">CVE-2026-5894 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5894 Inappropriate implementation in PDF</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5895">CVE-2026-5895 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5895 Incorrect security UI in Omnibox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5896">CVE-2026-5896 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5896 Policy bypass in Audio</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5897">CVE-2026-5897 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5897 Incorrect security UI in Downloads</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5898">CVE-2026-5898 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5898 Incorrect security UI in Omnibox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5899">CVE-2026-5899 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5899 Incorrect security UI in History Navigation</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5900">CVE-2026-5900 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5900 Policy bypass in Downloads</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5901">CVE-2026-5901 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5901 Policy bypass in DevTools</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5902">CVE-2026-5902 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5902 Race in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5903">CVE-2026-5903 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5903 Policy bypass in IFrameSandbox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5904">CVE-2026-5904 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5904 Use after free in V8</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5905">CVE-2026-5905 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5905 Incorrect security UI in Permissions</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5906">CVE-2026-5906 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5906 Incorrect security UI in Omnibox</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5907">CVE-2026-5907 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5907 Insufficient data validation in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5908">CVE-2026-5908 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5908 Integer overflow in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5909">CVE-2026-5909 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5909 Integer overflow in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5910">CVE-2026-5910 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5910 Integer overflow in Media</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5911">CVE-2026-5911 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5911 Policy bypass in ServiceWorkers</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5912">CVE-2026-5912 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5912 Integer overflow in WebRTC</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5913">CVE-2026-5913 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5913 Out of bounds read in Blink</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Info</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5914">CVE-2026-5914 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5914 Type Confusion in CSS</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>RCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5915">CVE-2026-5915 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5915 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebML</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5918">CVE-2026-5918 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5918 Inappropriate implementation in Navigation</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-5919">CVE-2026-5919 *</a></td>
  <td>Chromium: CVE-2026-5919 Insufficient validation of untrusted input in WebSockets</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>N/A</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>SFB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
  <td><a target="_blank" href="https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33118">CVE-2026-33118</a></td>
  <td>Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability</td>
  <td>Low</td>
  <td>4.3</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>No</td>
  <td>Spoofing</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
  
  









  <p class=""><em>* Indicates this CVE had been released by a third party and is now being included in Microsoft releases</em>.</p><p class=""><em>† Indicates further administrative actions are required to fully address the vulnerability.</em></p><p class=""><em> </em></p><p class="">Looking at the other Critical-rated bugs in this month’s release, there are three Office-related bugs where the Preview Pane is once again listed as an exploit vector. I would still like to have a full-proof way of disabling the Preview Pane, but I don’t see that as an option. There’s a bug in the RDP client, but that involves connecting to a malicious RDP server. The bug in Active Directory requires authentication and a network adjacent attacker. The final Critical-rated bug is an interesting DoS in .NET Framework. An unauthenticated attacker could deny service over a network – presumably crippling any affected app made in .NET. You rarely see Critical-rated DoS bugs, but this one deserves the moniker.</p><p class="">Moving on to the other code execution bugs, you have quite a few open-and-own bugs in Office components, most notably Excel, where the Preview Pane is not an attack vector. The bug in SQL Server requires authentication, and as usual, additional steps are needed to ensure you have the correct update to remediate this vulnerability. The two bugs in Hyper-V almost reads like a privilege escalation since it allows unauthorized attackers to execute code locally. That’s the same for the bugs in the Windows Snipping Tool and the UPnP Device host. </p><p class="">More than half of this release addresses Elevation of Privilege (EoP) bugs. However, most simply lead to local attackers executing their code at SYSTEM-level privileges or administrative privileges, so there’s not much to add without further technical details about the bugs themselves. The bugs in SQL Server could allow an attacker to gain SQL sysadmin privileges. One of the kernel bugs simply states an attacker could “elevate privileges locally”. How obtuse. That’s similar for the bug in afd.sys and Desktop Windows Manager, but Microsoft also states that these bugs could crash an affected system. There are several bugs that result in a sandbox escape, including Windows Push Notifications, AFD for Winsock, Management Services, and User Interface Core. Of these, CVE-2026-26167 (Push Notifications) is the most notable — it's the only one with low attack complexity, meaning no race condition needed. The rest all require winning a race condition (AC:H). The bugs in UPnP are interesting as they allow attackers to gain access to a limited set of administrator-protected objects. Not a full escalation but definitely getting access to resources they shouldn’t. The vulnerability in the Brokering File System allows attackers to gain the level of the logged on user, so don’t do your normal activities as a user with admin privileges. The bug in Azure Monitor Agent leads to root-level access. </p><p class="">There are a dozen different security features bypass bugs in the April release. Some of these are obvious by the title alone. For example, the bugs in Windows Hello bypass safety features within the Hello app itself. The bug in the Biometric Service allows attackers to bypass biometric protections. The vulns in BitLocker and Secure Boot bypass protections in those components. The bug in Power Apps allows attackers to bypass a security warning dialog and trick targets into triggering an external protocol call that performs unintended actions on the user’s device. The bug in Windows Shell allows attackers to bypass Mark of the Web (MotW) protections. The bug in PowerShell could almost be described as a code execution bug as exploiting it bypasses dynamic-expression security checks, which could result in code execution. The vulnerability in the Windows Recovery Environment allows local attackers to bypass BitLocker device encryption. Finally, the bug in Virtualization‑Based Security (VBS) is the most interesting of the bunch – and not just because VBS is a (relatively) new feature. The problem allows attackers to manipulate allow a compromised Windows kernel to modify memory belonging to the secure kernel, breaking the intended isolation guarantees provided by VBS. Somewhat of a sandbox escape, but this time, you’re escaping from Virtual Trust Level 0 (VTL0) to Virtual Trust Level 1 (VTL1). Neat.</p><p class="">Moving on to the Information Disclosure bugs fixed this month, we have 20 different CVEs. Fortunately, most of these simply result in info leaks consisting of unspecified memory contents or memory addresses. While useful in crafting exploits, they aren’t exactly exciting on their own. There are also several bugs that disclose addresses from an object a contained in a sandboxed execution environment. This includes bugs in the Print Spooler, Package Catalog, and Web Account Manager. The bug in Dynamics 365 discloses the ever ineffable “sensitive information”. There are three different info disclosure bugs in UPnP. Two allow an attacker to read from the file system, while the third discloses anything available to the LOCAL SERVICE account. The final info disclosure bug resides in Copilot and Visual Studio and allows attackers to disclose the contents of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) when using Copilot. There are those who think MCP is dead (thanks to agentic AI agents), but if you’re using a custom MCP, I doubt you would want it leaked.</p><p class="">The April release contains just a handful of Spoofing bugs. Some, like the bugs in .NET, Active Directory, and Windows Shell, just say that they allow spoofing over a network. Others, like the bug in Windows Snipping Tool, say similar but also note that it could be used to relay NTLMv2 hashes. The patch for RDP <a href="https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=2347342">notes</a> that there are new warning dialogs coming this month. The bug in the Windows Admin Center would allow an attacker to interact with other tenant’s applications and content. Finally, the spoofing bug in SharePoint is another XSS issue.</p><p class="">There are eight DoS bugs in the April release, but as always, Microsoft provides no actionable information about the vulnerabilities. Microsoft does offer a mitigation for the http.sys bug that can be applied while you test and deploy the patch, but I would rely on the patch rather than the mitigation. Another exception is the bug for Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service, which allows attackers to deny service locally rather than over the network.</p><p class="">The final(!) bug in the April release is a Tampering bug in WSUS that reads like a DoS. According to Microsoft, “An attacker can send specially crafted packets which could affect availability of the service and result in Denial of Service (DoS).” But sure – let’s call it Tampering. </p><p class="">No new advisories are being released this month.</p><p class=""><strong>Looking Ahead</strong></p><p class="">I will be in Berlin for the next Patch Tuesday, which will be May 12, and I’ll provide my full thoughts then on what will hopefully be a smaller release than this one. Until then, stay safe, happy patching, and may all your reboots be smooth and clean!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[IT Security News Hourly Summary 2026-07-25 18h : 26 posts]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[26 posts were published in the last hour 16:3 : Browser Security: Zero-Days Are Only Part of the Problem 16:3 : Why AI Governance Without Guardrails Is Theater 16:2 : PLEASE_READ_ME: The Opportunistic Ransomware Devastating MySQL Servers 16:2 : Emerging…
Read more →
The post IT Security News Hour...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694435/it-security-nachrichten/it-security-news-hourly-summary-2026-07-25-18h-26-posts/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694435/it-security-nachrichten/it-security-news-hourly-summary-2026-07-25-18h-26-posts/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:00:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>26 posts were published in the last hour 16:3 : Browser Security: Zero-Days Are Only Part of the Problem 16:3 : Why AI Governance Without Guardrails Is Theater 16:2 : PLEASE_READ_ME: The Opportunistic Ransomware Devastating MySQL Servers 16:2 : Emerging…</p>
<p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/it-security-news-hourly-summary-2026-07-25-18h-26-posts/">Read more →</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/it-security-news-hourly-summary-2026-07-25-18h-26-posts/">IT Security News Hourly Summary 2026-07-25 18h : 26 posts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.itsecuritynews.info/">IT Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Akku im Sinkflug – wann lohnt der Tausch, wann muss ein neues Notebook her?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[ParinPix / Shutterstock.com



Die Steckdose wird zum ständigen Begleiter, das Ladekabel zum wichtigsten Accessoire im Rucksack: Wenn der Notebook-Akku nachlässt, wächst unweigerlich der Frust im Alltag. Die schlechte Nachricht: Der chemische Alterungsprozess von Lithium-Ionen-Zellen ist unvermei...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694427/it-security-nachrichten/akku-im-sinkflug-wann-lohnt-der-tausch-wann-muss-ein-neues-notebook-her/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694427/it-security-nachrichten/akku-im-sinkflug-wann-lohnt-der-tausch-wann-muss-ein-neues-notebook-her/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:59:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-21.16.38.png?w=1024" alt="Akku im Sinkflug" class="wp-image-4198584" width="1024" height="576" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">ParinPix / Shutterstock.com</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Steckdose wird zum ständigen Begleiter, das Ladekabel zum wichtigsten Accessoire im Rucksack: Wenn der <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3158726/akkulaufzeit-unter-windows-11-erhoehen.html" target="_blank">Notebook-Akku</a> nachlässt, wächst unweigerlich der Frust im Alltag. Die schlechte Nachricht: Der chemische Alterungsprozess von Lithium-Ionen-Zellen ist unvermeidbar. Doch ein schwacher Akku bedeutet noch nicht zwingend, dass ein älterer <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2215385/die-besten-laptops-test.html" target="_blank">Laptop</a> in den Elektroschrott gehört. Oft lässt sich der Stromspeicher problemlos austauschen und die Reparatur ist wirtschaftlich sinnvoll. Aber nicht in jedem Fall. Wir zeigen, wie Sie sich an Fakten statt am Bauchgefühl orientieren und wann es Zeit wird, sich nach neuer Hardware umzusehen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Diagnose: Fakten statt Bauchgefühl</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-21.17.04.png?w=851" alt="Diagnose" class="wp-image-4198585" width="851" height="1024" sizes="auto, (max-width: 851px) 100vw, 851px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Foundry</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bevor Sie Schraubenzieher zücken oder neue Hardware kaufen, muss geklärt werden: Ist Ihr Akku wirklich verschlissen, oder saugt ressourcenfressende Software im Hintergrund heimlich den Stromspeicher leer? Die Frage ist schnell beantwortet, denn sowohl Windows als auch macOS bieten tiefgreifende <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3014555/laptop-windows-akkubericht.html" target="_blank">Diagnose-Tools</a>, die sich mit wenigen</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Unter Windows:</strong> Öffnen Sie die Windows-Eingabeaufforderung (CMD) oder PowerShell als Administrator und tippen Sie den Befehl</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code><strong>powercfg /batteryreport</strong></code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ein. Windows generiert daraufhin eine detaillierte HTML-Datei, die tief ins System blicken lässt. Öffnen Sie die Datei unter dem angegebenen Pfad – z.B. „C:\battery-report.html“. Entscheidend sind hier zwei Werte: die <strong>Design Capacity</strong> (die ursprüngliche Nennkapazität Ihres Akkus ab Werk) und die <strong>Full Charge Capacity</strong> (die aktuell noch erreichbare Maximalkapazität). Liegt die aktuelle Kapazität unter <strong>80 Prozent des Ursprungswertes</strong>, gilt ein Akku allgemein als verschlissen. Spätestens wenn er die 70-Prozent-Marke unterschreitet, wird der Kapazitätsverlust im Alltag oft zu einer spürbaren Einschränkung – das Bauteil ist Ende seines Lebenszyklus angekommen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Bei macOS:</strong> Auf einem MacBook führt der Weg über das Apfel-Menü zu <strong>Systemeinstellungen → Allgemein → Info → Systembericht</strong>. Unter dem Reiter „Stromversorgung“ finden Sie die Anzahl der Ladezyklen sowie den Zustand. Apple garantiert in der Regel, dass ein Akku nach 1.000 vollständigen Ladezyklen noch mindestens 80 Prozent seiner ursprünglichen Kapazität halten kann. Fällt der Wert darunter, rät das System oft von selbst zum Service.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Schrauben oder schrauben lassen?</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-21.17.18.png?w=1024" alt="Reparaturanleitungen" class="wp-image-4198586" width="1024" height="684" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Auf <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3174903/notebook-akku-tauschen-oder-neukauf-ratgeber.html#" target="_blank">iFixit</a> finden Verbraucher Reparaturanleitungen, Ersatzteile und Werkzeug für zahlreiche Notebooks, Smartphones und andere Elektronikgeräte.</figcaption></figure><p class="imageCredit">Foundry</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Steht der Defekt fest oder ist die Alterung bereits weit fortgeschritten, folgt oft eine logistische Herausforderung. Die Hardware-Realität von 2026 ist Verbrauchern nämlich nicht gerade entgegengekommen – zumindest beim Akku: In vielen modernen Ultrabooks, Surface-Geräten oder MacBooks sind die Akkuzellen großflächig im Gehäuse verklebt. Das macht den Tausch für Laien gefährlich, weil bei einer Beschädigung der Zellen <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2590103/akku-brennt-richtig-handeln-und-loeschen.html" target="_blank">akute Brandgefahr</a> besteht.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der Gang zur Fachwerkstatt ist deshalb oft alternativlos – achten Sie hierbei am besten auf zertifizierte Betriebe, die eine <strong>Garantie auf das Ersatzteil</strong> gewähren. Anders sieht es bei reparaturfreundlichen Business-Geräten wie dem <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3174903/notebook-akku-tauschen-oder-neukauf-ratgeber.html#" target="_blank">Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 5</a> oder Vorreitern der Modularität wie dem <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2230834/framework-laptop-16-test.html" target="_blank">Framework Laptop 16</a> aus: Hier brauchen Sie oft nur einen passenden Schraubendreher und zehn Minuten Zeit, um den Akku selbst zu tauschen. Wie Sie Ihren Akku am Laptop oder am Smartphone selbst tauschen können, <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2666199/akkutausch-so-klappts-beim-smartphone-und-notebook.html" target="_blank">erklären wir in diesem Ratgeber</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Achtung beim Teilekauf:</strong> Sparen Sie nicht am falschen Ende. Extrem billige Nachbau-Akkus von No-Name-Händlern auf großen Marktplätzen bergen nicht nur ein <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3060569/akku-ladefehler-brandgefahr-vermeiden.html" target="_blank">Brandrisiko</a>, sondern schummeln oft auch bei der echten Kapazität. Greifen Sie <strong>unbedingt zu Originalteilen des Herstellers</strong> oder zu zertifizierten Ersatzteilen etablierter Drittanbieter (wie <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3174903/notebook-akku-tauschen-oder-neukauf-ratgeber.html#" target="_blank">iFixit</a>).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wenn die Diagnose zeigt, dass Ihr Akku physisch noch fit ist, dann liegt das Problem vermutlich an Software mit Selbstbedienungsmentalität. Praktisch: Windows und macOS verfügen über integrierte Stromfresser-Finder. Unter Windows navigieren Sie zu <strong>Einstellungen</strong> <strong>→ Strom und Akku → Akkunutzung</strong>. Dort listet Windows genau auf, welche Apps in den letzten Tagen am meisten Energie verbraucht haben. Auf dem Mac erfüllt die App <strong>Aktivitätsanzeige</strong> (Reiter <strong>Energie</strong>) denselben Zweck. Stoßen Sie hier auf Programme, die Sie gar nicht aktiv nutzen, sollten Sie deren Hintergrundaktivität einschränken oder die Software komplett deinstallieren.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>💡 Infobox: Das neue Recht auf Reparatur (Stand 2026)</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das<strong> Recht auf Reparatur </strong>stammt von der Europäischen Kommission und dem EU-Parlament. Ziel des Gesetzespakets ist es, die wachsenden Berge von Elektroschrott auf dem Kontinent zu reduzieren und die Kreislaufwirtschaft zu stärken. Nach der Verabschiedung der EU-Richtlinie im Jahr 2024 hatten die Mitgliedsstaaten bis 2026 Zeit, die Vorgaben <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3174903/notebook-akku-tauschen-oder-neukauf-ratgeber.html#" target="_blank">in nationales Recht umzusetzen</a> – nun greifen die Regeln schrittweise und wirken sich zunehmend auf den Reparaturalltag aus.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Was Verbraucher davon haben:</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Reparaturpflicht:</strong> Hersteller sind nun gesetzlich verpflichtet, für gängige Elektronikgeräte (wie Smartphones und Laptops) Reparaturen anzubieten – und das auch nach Ablauf der gesetzlichen Gewährleistung.</li>



<li><strong>Zugang zu Ersatzteilen:</strong> Unabhängige Fachwerkstätten und ambitionierte Bastler erhalten leichteren Zugang zu Original-Ersatzteilen und offiziellen Reparaturanleitungen.</li>



<li><strong>Weniger Software-Sperren:</strong> Praktiken wie das sogenannte “Parts Pairing” (bei dem Ersatzteile per Software blockiert werden, wenn sie nicht von einer offiziellen Vertragswerkstatt eingebaut wurden) werden stark eingeschränkt.</li>



<li><strong>Mehr Wirtschaftlichkeit:</strong> Durch den faireren Wettbewerb sinken die Reparaturkosten, was den Tausch eines Akkus oft attraktiver macht als einen teuren Neukauf.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Wann lohnt sich der Tausch?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Um zu beurteilen, ob sich die Investition für den Austausch lohnt, hilft die bewährte <strong>50-Prozent-Regel</strong>: Übersteigen die Kosten für die Reparatur (Ersatz-Akku plus eventuelle Arbeitszeit der Werkstatt) mehr als die Hälfte des aktuellen Restwerts des Notebooks, wird die Angelegenheit unwirtschaftlich.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Ein Rechenbeispiel:</strong> Ein vier Jahre altes Premium-Notebook, das früher mal 1.500 Euro gekostet hat, bringt auf dem Gebrauchtmarkt vielleicht noch 400 bis 500 Euro. Eine Investition von 120 Euro für einen fachgerechten Akkutausch ist dann noch durchaus sinnvoll und kann dem Gerät weitere zwei bis drei Lebensjahre verschaffen. Bei einem ohnehin leistungsschwachen 400-Euro-Plastikbomber aus dem Jahr 2021 ist eine 100-Euro-Reparatur jedoch (jenseits von Nostalgiegründen) kaum zu vertreten und gilt als unwirtschaftlich.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Wann ein Neukauf wirklich sinnvoll ist</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mal ehrlich: Der Akku ist oft nur das offensichtlichste Symptom eines veralteten Systems. Wer über eine Reparatur nachdenkt, sollte objektiv prüfen, ob die restliche Hardware den heutigen Anforderungen noch gewachsen ist – oder ob man mit einem <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2215385/die-besten-laptops-test.html" target="_blank">neuen Laptop</a> besser fährt:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Windows 10 Support-Ende:</strong> Das offizielle Support-Ende von Windows 10 (Oktober 2025) liegt bereits hinter uns. Privatanwender in der EU haben zwar <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2941599/windows-10-gratis-sicher-nutzen-esu-registrierung-so-gehts.html" target="_blank">Glück im Unglück</a>: Wer mit einem Microsoft-Konto angemeldet ist, <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3177497/windows-10-bekommt-ein-weiteres-jahr-lang-updates.html" target="_blank">erhält die Extended Security Updates (ESU) im ersten Jahr bis Oktober 2027 kostenlos.</a> Doch spätestens im Herbst 2027 ist endgültig Schicht im Schacht. Geräte, deren Prozessoren nicht offiziell für Windows 11 zertifiziert sind (ältere CPUs vor der Intel Core 8. Generation oder AMD Ryzen 2000er-Serie), stoßen dann an ihre praktische Lebensdauergrenze. Ohne den auslaufenden ESU-Schutz sollten Sie ab diesem Zeitpunkt bei betroffenen Windows-Geräten nicht mehr in einen neuen Akku investieren.</li>



<li><strong>Speicher-Flaschenhälse:</strong> Verlöteter, nicht aufrüstbarer Arbeitsspeicher von 8 GB stößt selbst bei ausschließlicher Browser-Nutzung und Office-Anwendungen oft an seine Grenzen.</li>



<li><strong>Träge Performance:</strong> Wenn das Notebook nicht nur schnell leer ist, sondern beim Öffnen von Programmen ins Schwitzen kommt und der Lüfter permanent auf Hochtouren läuft, bringt auch der stärkste neue Akku kein flüssiges Arbeitsgefühl zurück.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Zeit für einen neuen Laptop?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wenn kein (sinnvoller) Weg mehr am Neukauf vorbeiführt, ist das nicht immer eine schlechte Nachricht: Moderne Geräte punkten nicht nur mit deutlich mehr Ausdauer jenseits der Steckdose – sie bringen auch spürbar mehr Tempo und Sicherheit, effizientere Hardware und oft angenehm leise Kühlung in Ihren Alltag.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Fazit und Checkliste: Akku tauschen oder Neukauf?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Entscheidung zwischen Werkstatt und Neuanschaffung ist am Ende des Tages ein Abwägen von Kosten, Nutzen und Sicherheit. Die folgende Checkliste hilft dabei, das Schicksal Ihres Notebooks zu klären:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Der Tausch lohnt sich, wenn:</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>der Laptop noch alle Leistungsanforderungen im Alltag erfüllt.</li>



<li>Windows 11 offiziell unterstützt wird (oder macOS/Linux aktuell ist).</li>



<li>die Gesamtreparatur weniger als 50 % des Restwerts kostet.</li>



<li>das Gehäuse unbeschädigt ist und Scharniere sowie Tastatur noch zuverlässig funktionieren.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Ein Neukauf ist besser, wenn:</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>das Betriebssystem (z. B. Windows 10) keine Sicherheitsupdates mehr erhält.</li>



<li>das Gerät durch 8 GB RAM oder eine alte CPU ohnehin ein Flaschenhals im Alltag ist.</li>



<li>Displayschäden oder defekte Ports weitere, teure Reparaturen erfordern.</li>



<li>die Reparatur den Zeitwert des Geräts deutlich übersteigt.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3174903/notebook-akku-tauschen-oder-neukauf-ratgeber.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3174903/notebook-akku-tauschen-oder-neukauf-ratgeber.html" target="_blank">PC-Welt</a>)</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Honor Magic V6 im Test: Das fast perfekte Foldable]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Luke Baker



Auf einen Blick



Pro




Wunderschönes, schlankes Design



Große, helle Displays



Hervorragende Kameras



Coole Software-Funktionen




Kontra




Hoher Preis



MagicOS kann gelegentlich frustrierend sein




Fazit



Das Honor Magic V6 ist ein Falt-Smartphone, das einfach al...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694426/it-security-nachrichten/honor-magic-v6-im-test-das-fast-perfekte-foldable/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694426/it-security-nachrichten/honor-magic-v6-im-test-das-fast-perfekte-foldable/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:59:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-21.52.53.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4198590" width="1024" height="586" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Auf einen Blick</h2>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Pro</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Wunderschönes, schlankes Design</li>



<li>Große, helle Displays</li>



<li>Hervorragende Kameras</li>



<li>Coole Software-Funktionen</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Kontra</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Hoher Preis</li>



<li>MagicOS kann gelegentlich frustrierend sein</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Fazit</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Honor Magic V6 ist ein Falt-Smartphone, das einfach alles kann. Es ist schlank, robust, leistungsstark und sieht gut aus. Die Kameras gehören zu den besten, die Software bietet einige raffinierte Funktionen und die Akkulaufzeit ist außergewöhnlich. Besitzer eines Magic V5 werden wahrscheinlich kaum einen Grund für ein Upgrade sehen, aber für alle anderen ist es eine gute Wahl – sofern Sie es sich leisten können.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Honor Magic V6 wurde ursprünglich bereits im März in China vorgestellt, doch es dauerte eine Weile, bis es den Weg nach Europa fand. Nun ist es endlich in Europa erhältlich und strebt den Titel des bislang <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2109390/bestes-falt-smartphone.html" target="_blank">besten Falt-Smartphones</a> an.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Leider ist die Konkurrenz für Honor stärker denn je, und sie wird noch härter werden, sobald Apples seit Langem gemunkeltes Foldable auf den Markt kommt. Bietet dieses schlanke Kraftpaket genug, um weiterhin überzeugend zu bleiben?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Es sieht auf jeden Fall vielversprechend aus, verfügt über einen der größten Akkus aller jemals erschienenen Falt-Smartphones, ist das erste mit IP69-Zertifizierung und gehört dennoch zu den dünnsten Modellen. Das ist schon mal ein guter Anfang. Ich habe es in den vergangenen Wochen auf Herz und Nieren geprüft, und hier ist mein Fazit.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Design &amp; Verarbeitung</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Aluminiumrahmen, Rückseite aus Verbundfasermaterial</li>



<li>219 g, NanoCrystal Shield-Glas</li>



<li>IP69-zertifiziert</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Honor Magic V6 sieht dem <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2838914/honor-magic-v5-test.html" target="_blank">Magic V5</a> sehr ähnlich, wobei der auffälligste Unterschied in der Form des Kamerarahmens liegt. Dieser ist nun kantiger und weist eine achteckige Form auf. Auch neue Farbvarianten tragen dazu bei, es von der Vorgängergeneration abzugrenzen.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.14.26.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199606" width="1024" height="586" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die rote Version ist wahrscheinlich die auffälligste; sie verfügt über eine tiefrote, fast blutrote Rückseite mit strukturierter Oberfläche. Ich besitze die goldene Version, die ebenfalls sehr auffällig ist. Freunde haben bemerkt, dass es wie ein Smartphone aussieht, das ein saudischer Prinz oder Kim Kardashian benutzen würde.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Farbe schimmert leicht, wenn Licht darauf fällt; sowohl am Scharnier als auch auf der Rückseite ist ein dezentes, sich wiederholendes Dreiecksmuster zu erkennen, und es bleibt irgendwie frei von Fingerabdrücken, obwohl es ziemlich glänzend ist. Das sieht wirklich cool aus. Auch die mitgelieferte Hülle ist von höchster Qualität, mit einem cremefarbenen Kunstlederbezug und einem roségoldenen Kamerarahmen, der gleichzeitig als ausklappbarer Ständer dient.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wenn Sie etwas suchen, das etwas weniger Aufmerksamkeit auf sich zieht, gibt es natürlich auch traditionellere Modelle in Schwarz und Weiß. Letzteres hat zudem einen versteckten Vorteil: Mit nur 8,75 Millimetern im geschlossenen Zustand ist es das dünnste Modell der Reihe, und Honor geht davon aus, dass es derzeit das dünnste Falt-Smartphone auf dem Markt ist.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ich habe das weiße Modell nicht ausprobiert, und vielleicht ist es tatsächlich spürbar schlanker, aber meiner Meinung nach sieht die goldene Version definitiv etwas dicker aus und fühlt sich auch so wie mein 8,9 Millimeter dickes <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2843601/samsung-galaxy-z-fold-7-test.html" target="_blank">Galaxy Z Fold 7</a> an.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das ist allerdings Haarspalterei, denn dieses Smartphone ist immer noch dünner als viele Flaggschiff-Smartphones im Barrenformat. Ob es nun das dünnste ist oder nicht – es ist auf jeden Fall dünn genug, um sich in der Hosentasche angenehm anzufühlen.<br><br></p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.14.34.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199607" width="1024" height="586" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Erwähnenswert ist auch, dass das Cover-Display nun flach ist und eine symmetrischere Form aufweist. Dadurch sieht das Smartphone im zusammengeklappten Zustand noch mehr wie ein herkömmliches Barren-Handy aus, doch die unvermeidliche, eckige Kante am Scharnier verrät es ein wenig.<br><br></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So wichtig die Abmessungen eines Klapphandys auch sind, ebenso entscheidend ist die Robustheit. Und glücklicherweise ist das Honor Magic V6 robust wie ein Panzer gebaut.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Es verfügt über die Schutzklasse IP69 – die höchste aller faltbaren Smartphones. Das bedeutet, dass es praktisch staubdicht ist und sowohl das Eintauchen in Süßwasser als auch den Strahl von heißem Wasser problemlos aushält. Die Technologie der faltbaren Smartphones hat große Fortschritte gemacht.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Es ist zudem besonders robust konstruiert, mit kratzfestem „NanoCrystal Shield“-Glas auf der Vorderseite und einem „Super Steel“-Scharnier, das die Stoßfestigkeit verbessert.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">SGS-Zertifizierungen untermauern diese Angaben ebenfalls, da das Smartphone für seine Fallfestigkeit mit 5 Sternen ausgezeichnet wurde. Ich habe mein Testgerät nicht allzu grob behandelt, aber es ist beruhigend zu wissen, dass es unversehrt bleiben dürfte, sollte mir einmal ein Ausrutscher unterlaufen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Bildschirm &amp; Lautsprecher</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Außen: 6,52 Zoll, 1.080 x 2.420, OLED, 120 Hertz</li>



<li>Innen: 7,95 Zoll, 2.172 × 2.352, OLED, 120 Hertz</li>



<li>Stereolautsprecher</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bei Falt-Smartphones dreht sich alles um den Bildschirm. Beginnen wir also mit dem Star der Show: dem inneren Display. Mit einer Diagonale von knapp unter 8 Zoll gehört es zu den größten Falt-Smartphones im Buchformat auf dem Markt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Es ist nahezu perfekt quadratisch, was sich hervorragend für die parallele Nutzung zweier Apps eignet.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.14.39.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199608" width="1024" height="586" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dieses flexible Display verfügt über eine Bildwiederholfrequenz von 120 Hertz und erreicht eine beeindruckende Spitzenhelligkeit von 5.000 Nits. Solche Helligkeitsangaben sollten Sie zwar stets mit einer gehörigen Portion Skepsis betrachten, doch unabhängig davon handelt es sich um ein sehr helles Display, das auch im Freien gut ablesbar ist.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der innere Bildschirm ist mit einer glänzenden Schutzfolie versehen (wenn auch mit einer Antireflexbeschichtung), was sowohl Vor- als auch Nachteile mit sich bringt. Wie ich bereits in anderen Testberichten zu Falt-Smartphones erwähnt habe, kaschieren mattierte Schutzfolien die Falz zwar besser, ziehen aber auch Fingerabdrücke an. Diese hier verschmiert nicht so leicht, doch trotz aller Bemühungen von Honor treten entlang der Falz einige unerwünschte Reflexionen auf.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.14.44.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199609" width="1024" height="586" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Apropos: Die Falz ist bewundernswert flach, und noch vor nicht allzu langer Zeit wäre sie die beste gewesen, die mir je begegnet wäre. Allerdings nutze ich das Oppo Find N6 seit seiner Markteinführung fast täglich, und leider kann dieses Modell da nicht ganz mithalten.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Es ist dennoch äußerst beeindruckend und um Längen besser als das <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2945312/google-pixel-10-pro-test-3.html" target="_blank">Pixel 10 Pro Fold</a>. Auch im Vergleich zum Galaxy Z Fold 7 fällt die Falz etwas weniger auf.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Was das Außendisplay betrifft, so ist es fast nicht von dem Bildschirm eines Flaggschiff-Handys im Barren-Format zu unterscheiden, abgesehen davon, dass es ganz leicht schmaler ist als üblich. Es verfügt über schöne, schmale Einfassungen an allen Seiten, eine flinke Bildwiederholfrequenz von 120 Hertz und eine noch höhere Spitzenhelligkeit von 6.000 Nits.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wie bereits bei den letzten Generationen der faltbaren Honor-Modelle gibt es keine nennenswerten Nachteile bei der Nutzung des zusammengeklappten Telefons; es fühlt sich einfach wie ein normales Smartphone an. Wenn Sie dann einen größeren Bildschirm für Ihre Inhalte, Spiele oder Multitasking benötigen, klappen Sie es einfach auf.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.14.47.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199611" width="1024" height="586" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wie üblich hat Honor einiges in Funktionen zum Augenschutz investiert, und beide Bildschirme unterstützen eine PWM-Dimmung mit 4.320 Hertz. Das werden Sie besonders zu schätzen wissen, wenn Sie empfindlich auf Flackern reagieren. Beide Bildschirme unterstützen zudem die Eingabe per Stylus, allerdings hatte ich leider keinen Honor-Stylus zur Hand, um dies auszuprobieren.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die luxuriösen Displays werden durch ein ordentliches Lautsprecherset ergänzt. Das Stereopaar erzeugt eine schöne, breite Klangbühne, kann mehr als laut genug werden und bietet eine ordentliche Basswiedergabe. Sie können zwar nicht mit den bassbetonten Lautsprechern des <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3041397/honor-magic-8-pro-test.html" target="_blank">Magic 8 Pro</a> mithalten, aber bei einem so schlanken Gehäuse sind die Möglichkeiten nun einmal begrenzt.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Technische Daten &amp; Leistung</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5</li>



<li>16 GB RAM</li>



<li>512 GB Speicher</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Magic V6 verfügt über den leistungsstärksten Chip von Qualcomm, den Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, und das globale Modell ist mit 16 GB RAM und 512 GB Speicher ausgestattet. Bei einem so schlanken Falt-Smartphone stellt die Wärmeableitung stets eine Herausforderung dar, doch Honor hat hier eine großzügig dimensionierte Vapor-Chamber verbaut, um eine optimale Leistung zu gewährleisten.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.14.51.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199612" width="1024" height="586" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das V6 hat meine täglichen Leistungsanforderungen problemlos erfüllt. Bei einem Falt-Smartphone habe ich oft drei Apps gleichzeitig geöffnet, wechsle zwischen ihnen hin und her und spiele häufig gleichzeitig Musik ab oder streame Videos. Selbst dann kam das Smartphone kaum ins Schwitzen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Man muss schon ein ziemlich anspruchsvolles Spiel starten, um dieses Smartphone ein wenig ins Schwitzen zu bringen, und wie es der Zufall so will, bin ich ziemlich süchtig nach <em>NTE: Neverness to Everness</em> (ein Open-World-Spiel mit atemberaubender Grafik und einer riesigen Stadtkarte, mit deren Darstellung die meisten Smartphones zu kämpfen haben). Doch das Magic V6 hatte damit kaum Probleme.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Spiel lief bei der Grafikvoreinstellung „Extreme“ flüssig mit 60 FPS, und obwohl es sich ziemlich stark erwärmte – insbesondere im Bereich der Kamera –, schien die Leistung darunter nicht zu leiden. Die beste Erfahrung machte ich mit einem GameSir-Clamp-Controller, der die Wärme von meinen Handflächen fernhielt.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.14.55.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199613" width="1024" height="586" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Honor Magic V6 – Benchmark-Ergebnisse</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Was die Benchmark-Ergebnisse angeht, wird es recht interessant. Während die meisten Ergebnisse hervorragend waren, hatte das Smartphone erhebliche Schwierigkeiten, den 3DMark Wildlife Extreme Stress Test abzuschließen. Normalerweise führe ich diesen Test bei aufgeklapptem Smartphone durch, doch es überhitzte sich und brach den Benchmark jedes Mal ab, wenn ich es versuchte.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zugegebenermaßen war es in letzter Zeit recht warm, doch so etwas ist mir bisher noch nie passiert. Bei der Durchführung des Tests auf dem Cover-Display konnte es den Test mit einem ordentlichen Ergebnis abschließen, auf dem klappbaren Bildschirm war dies jedoch nicht möglich. Im alltäglichen Gebrauch hatte ich jedoch nie derartige Probleme.</p>



<div class="infogram-embed" data-id="c07985c1-d0b5-46f6-bd84-2898abc5f4fa" data-type="interactive" data-title="Honor Magic V6 benchmarks"></div>




<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Kameras</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>50-MP-Hauptkamera mit f/1,6</li>



<li>64 MP, f/2,5, 3-fach-Tele</li>



<li>50 MP, f/2,2 Ultraweitwinkel</li>



<li>20 MP, f/2,2 Selfie-Kamera</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Honor Magic V6 verfügt über dieselbe Kamera-Hardware wie die Vorgängergeneration, was bedeutet, dass es keine nennenswerten Neuerungen gibt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Allerdings verfügte das V5 bereits über eine der beeindruckendsten Kameraausstattungen unter allen faltbaren Smartphones, und die Konkurrenz hat sich in dieser Hinsicht nicht sonderlich ins Zeug gelegt – daher gehört es nach wie vor zu den Besten.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.14.59.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199614" width="1024" height="586" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Auf der Rückseite befindet sich eine 50-MP-Hauptkamera mit einem Sensor von ansehnlicher Größe (1/1,56 Zoll) und einem lichtstarken f/1,6-Objektiv. Hinzu kommen eine 50-MP-Ultraweitwinkelkamera mit einem extrem weiten Sichtfeld (entspricht 13 mm) sowie ein ausgezeichnetes 64-MP-Teleobjektiv. Außerdem gibt es zwei 20-MP-Selfie-Kameras, von denen jeweils eine durch das jeweilige Display ragt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dies ist eine äußerst vielseitige Objektivausstattung, mit der Sie alles aufnehmen können – von weitläufigen Landschaften bis zu intimen Porträts. Wie üblich hat mir die Verwendung des Teleobjektivs am meisten Spaß gemacht, und dies könnte die beste Tele-Kamera sein, die jemals in einem faltbaren Smartphone verbaut wurde.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Es verfügt über einen recht großen 1/2-Zoll-Sensor und kann aus sehr kurzer Entfernung fokussieren. Ihr Motiv muss sich lediglich etwa 20 Zentimeter vom Objektiv entfernt befinden, und in Kombination mit der Brennweite von 70 mm (äquivalent) entsteht so eine schöne perspektivische Kompression und ein natürliches Bokeh.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Natürlich können Sie mit einem digitalen Ausschnitt noch weiter zoomen, und die Kamera-App ermöglicht Ihnen auf Wunsch eine bis zu 100-fache Vergrößerung. Bei einer Vergrößerung von mehr als 10-fach können Sie generative KI nutzen, um die Bilder zu bereinigen, doch auch ohne diese Funktion erhalten Sie bereits bei etwa 20-facher Vergrößerung brauchbare Bilder.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ich habe bereits erwähnt, wie weitwinklig das Ultraweitwinkelobjektiv ist, und das gefällt mir besonders gut daran; ansonsten ist es jedoch im Vergleich zu den anderen Objektiven definitiv ein Qualitätsverlust.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nachts ist es zudem am wenigsten überzeugend, da Bewegungsunschärfe dort nur schwer zu bewältigen ist. Bei den richtigen Lichtverhältnissen ist es jedoch zu wirklich beeindruckenden Aufnahmen fähig.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.15.23.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199618" width="1024" height="918" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Hauptkamera ist wie immer die zuverlässigste des Trios. Dank des größeren Sensors schneidet sie bei schlechten Lichtverhältnissen am besten ab und liefert tagsüber etwas schärfere Bilder als die anderen Kameras.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Selfie-Kameras sind nichts Besonderes. Sie erfüllen ihren Zweck und eignen sich für Zoom-Anrufe, doch wenn man auf der Rückseite so beeindruckende Kameras hat, lohnt es sich wirklich, das Smartphone umzudrehen und den Bildschirm auf der Rückseite zu nutzen, um wirklich beeindruckende Fotos zu machen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Bildverarbeitung von Honor kann etwas unbeständig sein, aber ich habe den Eindruck, dass sie immer konsistenter wird, und wenn sie funktioniert, lassen sich wirklich atemberaubende Bilder erzielen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mein größter Kritikpunkt ist die Bewegungsunschärfe im Porträtmodus. Ich bin mir nicht sicher, woran es liegt, aber ich erhalte viele unscharfe Aufnahmen, wenn die künstliche Hintergrundunschärfe aktiviert ist – selbst bei guten Lichtverhältnissen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ansonsten bin ich mit den Bildern, die ich mit dem Magic V6 aufgenommen habe, sehr zufrieden. Die Harcourt-Porträtmodi sind so beeindruckend wie eh und je, und mit den übrigen Filtern lässt sich der Look Ihrer Fotos ziemlich drastisch verändern. Besonders gut gefällt mir der Filter „Nostalgic Negative“, der einen schönen, kontrastreichen Cross-Entwicklungs-Look mit blauen Schatten erzeugt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Was die Videoaufnahmen angeht, ist das Angebot etwas weniger umfangreich. Das soll nicht heißen, dass es schlecht ist, aber nachdem ich viel Zeit mit dem Oppo Find N6 verbracht habe, habe ich mich an ein ordentliches Log-Profil, 4K-120-Aufnahmen und Dolby Vision gewöhnt. Nichts davon ist hier vorhanden. Es gibt zwar ein Log-Profil, dieses funktioniert jedoch nur mit dem Hauptsensor und erzeugt ungewöhnlich körnige Schatten.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wenn Sie jedoch keine ganz so professionellen Ansprüche haben, werden Sie mit der Videoleistung wahrscheinlich sehr zufrieden sein. Sie können mit jeder Kamera bis zu 4K bei 60 FPS aufnehmen, mit Ausnahme der Selfie-Kamera, die maximal 4K bei 30 FPS erreicht. Die Bildstabilisierung ist gut, und auch die Mikrofone sind ordentlich.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Akkulaufzeit &amp; Aufladen</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>6.660-mAh-Akku</li>



<li>80-Watt-Laden über Kabel</li>



<li>66 Watt kabelloses Laden</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Honor Magic V6 verfügt über den größten Akku aller faltbaren Smartphones, die ich bisher getestet habe. Irgendwie ist es Honor gelungen, einen 6660-mAh-Akku in dieses hauchdünne Gehäuse zu integrieren. Samsun wird hoffentlich davon lernen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Diese Kapazität verblasst zwar im Vergleich zur chinesischen 1-TB-Version dieses Smartphones, die über einen erstaunlichen 7.150-mAh-Akku verfügt, doch wie wir in letzter Zeit oft gesehen haben, bedeuten die EU-Vorschriften, dass wir im Westen keinen ganz so massiven Akku erhalten können.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.15.38.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199619" width="1024" height="574" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das spielt jedoch keine allzu große Rolle, denn dieser Akku ist mehr als gut genug. Obwohl ich den großen internen Bildschirm häufig nutzte und unzählige Fotos machte, reichte die Akkulaufzeit dieses Smartphones während des Großteils meiner Tests für eineinhalb Tage. Natürlich verkürzt intensives Gaming die Laufzeit etwas, aber Sie werden das Gerät selten, wenn überhaupt, vor dem Schlafengehen aufladen müssen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Auch das Aufladen erfolgt schnell, vorausgesetzt, Sie verfügen über ein ausreichend leistungsstarkes Netzteil (im Lieferumfang ist lediglich ein USB-C-Kabel enthalten), um die 80-Watt-Geschwindigkeit nutzen zu können. Ich konnte das Gerät in nur einer halben Stunde von leer auf fast 70 Prozent aufladen; mehr kann man sich kaum wünschen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wenn Sie kabelloses Laden bevorzugen, ist dies ohne nennenswerte Einbußen bei der Geschwindigkeit möglich. Das Honor Magic V6 lässt sich mit einem offiziellen kabellosen Ladepad von Honor mit bis zu 66 Watt aufladen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Software &amp; Apps</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>MagicOS 10, basierend auf Android 16</li>



<li>Zahlreiche KI-Funktionen</li>



<li>Kompatibilität mit dem Apple-Ökosystem</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Auf dem Magic V6 läuft MagicOS 10, Honors eigene Variante von <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2781437/android-16-release-design-funktionen-kompatible-geraete.html" target="_blank">Android 16</a>. Es handelt sich im Wesentlichen um dieselbe Software, die wir bereits von den letzten Honor-Flaggschiffmodellen kennen. Wenn Sie also bereits eines dieser Modelle ausprobiert haben, werden Sie kaum Überraschungen erleben.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.15.46.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199620" width="1024" height="574" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Software von Honor kann die Meinungen spalten. Sie weicht ziemlich stark vom typischen Android-Erlebnis ab; stattdessen erinnert sie zunehmend an iOS. Ob das nun gut ist oder nicht, hängt ganz von Ihren Vorlieben ab.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Allerdings lässt sich die Benutzeroberfläche extrem gut anpassen – wenn Ihnen also das Design oder das Layout einer Funktion nicht gefällt, können Sie es höchstwahrscheinlich ändern.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Insgesamt gefällt sie mir recht gut. Sie wirkt schnell und reaktionsfreudig, sieht standardmäßig ansprechend aus und bietet zahlreiche Werkzeuge zur weiteren Anpassung. Wie bereits erwähnt, gibt es zahlreiche Anlehnungen an iOS, darunter einige „Liquid Glass“-ähnliche Elemente, einen „Dynamic Island“-Klon, geteilte Benachrichtigungen/Schnelleinstellungen sowie die Möglichkeit, die App-Übersicht zu deaktivieren.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das sind zwar nicht die originellsten Entscheidungen, aber sie funktionieren gut, und die meisten sind vollkommen optional.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Honor bietet Ihnen eine Vielzahl von KI-Funktionen, darunter die üblichen Tools für Transkription, Übersetzung und Zusammenfassung sowie einige sehr fortschrittliche Funktionen zur Fotobearbeitung.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.15.53.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199623" width="1024" height="574" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Auch das Multitasking ist hervorragend. Sie können Apps im Split-View nebeneinander anzeigen und dann eine dritte hinzufügen, die nur am Rand des Bildschirms hervorblitzt und bei Bedarf sofort einsatzbereit ist. Oder, wenn Sie es vorziehen, können Sie schwebende Fenster nutzen und so noch mehr Inhalte gleichzeitig auf dem Bildschirm anzeigen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Am spannendsten finde ich jedoch die Art und Weise, wie sich das Magic V6 in Apple-Produkte integrieren lässt. Insbesondere, wie gut es mit meinem Macbook zusammenarbeitet. Wenn Sie die Honor Workstation-App aus dem Mac App Store installieren, können Sie Dateien austauschen, zwischen Geräten kopieren und einfügen, Ihr Smartphone fernsteuern und das V6 sogar als drahtlosen zweiten Bildschirm nutzen.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.15.58.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199625" width="1024" height="574" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Doch damit ist der Spaß noch lange nicht vorbei. Das Honor Magic V6 kann auch nativ Dateien in Ihrem iCloud-Konto durchsuchen und verwalten, und mit Honor Connect können Sie Dateien auch per AirDrop zu und von iPhones übertragen. Das ist großartig, wenn Sie ständig zwischen verschiedenen Ökosystemen hin- und herwechseln (wie ich es oft tue).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Insgesamt ist es also ein solides Software-Erlebnis, das jedoch nicht ganz ohne Nachteile ist. Meine größte Kritik an Honor-Smartphones ist seit einigen Jahren unberücksichtigt geblieben. Das Akkumanagement ist extrem aggressiv und beendet standardmäßig Hintergrund-Apps mit rücksichtsloser Härte.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das bedeutet, dass Sie häufig unter stark verzögerten Benachrichtigungen leiden, bis Sie einige Einstellungen anpassen und sicherstellen, dass diese Apps geöffnet bleiben.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-19-um-22.16.03.png?w=1024" alt="Honor Magic V6" class="wp-image-4199626" width="1024" height="574" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Luke Baker</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br><br>Das lässt sich zwar leicht beheben, und ich kann die Logik dahinter nachvollziehen – schließlich bieten Honor-Smartphones stets eine hervorragende Akkulaufzeit –, doch es ist äußerst ärgerlich, und ich würde mich sehr freuen, wenn dieses Problem behoben würde.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Honor verspricht sieben Jahre lang Software-Updates und Sicherheitspatches für seine Flaggschiff-Geräte und liegt damit auf einer Stufe mit Samsung und Apple. Viel besser geht es kaum, auch wenn Sie möglicherweise eine Weile auf das auf <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2990238/android-17-release-features-update-2.html" target="_blank">Android 17</a> basierende MagicOS 11 warten müssen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Preis &amp; Verfügbarkeit</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Honor Magic V6 kann ab sofort in Deutschland und den meisten anderen Ländern der Welt bestellt werden, wobei die USA wie üblich ausgeschlossen sind. Hierzulande liegt der Preis bei stolzen <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3183215/honor-magic-v6-test-review.html#" target="_blank">2.299 Euro</a>, wobei es bis zum 31. Juli noch einen Rabatt von 600 Euro gibt (Endpreis: 1.699,90 Euro).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Als besonderes Einführungsangebot legt Honor auch eine Reihe kostenloser Extras wie ein Tablet, einen Stift und ein Set Earbuds bei. Das macht eine Beurteilung des Preises ziemlich schwierig. Auf dem Papier ist das Magic V6 deutlich teurer als das V5, das im vergangenen Jahr für 1.999 Euro auf den Markt kam. Und das schmerzt, insbesondere wenn man bedenkt, dass es seinem Vorgänger so ähnlich ist. Mit dem Rabatt ist es jedoch günstiger.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Preislich bewegt es sich trotzdem noch in einem ähnlichen Rahmen wie viele andere Falt-Smartphones, die wir getestet haben. Darunter das <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3168239/motorola-razr-fold-test.html" target="_blank">Motorola Razr Fold</a>, <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2843601/samsung-galaxy-z-fold-7-test.html" target="_blank">das Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7</a> und <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2945312/google-pixel-10-pro-test-3.html" target="_blank">das Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Sollten Sie das Honor Magic V6 kaufen?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Das Magic V6 ist zweifellos eines der attraktivsten faltbaren Smartphones, die derzeit auf dem Markt erhältlich sind. Die Hardware ist hervorragend, die Bildschirme sind beeindruckend, es ist leistungsstark und die Kameras sind erstklassig. Wenn Sie ein faltbares Smartphone mit großem Bildschirm suchen, aber bei den Kameras keine allzu großen Abstriche machen möchten, ist dies eine hervorragende Wahl.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Allerdings könnten versierte Käufer sich für das <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2838914/honor-magic-v5-test.html" target="_blank">Vorjahresmodell</a> entscheiden und für deutlich weniger Geld ein sehr ähnliches Gesamterlebnis erhalten. Es ist nach wie vor extrem leistungsstark und verfügt über dieselben Kameras. Es wird jedoch nicht ewig vorrätig sein.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Man sollte auch bedenken, dass das Galaxy Z Fold 8 und das Z Fold 8 Ultra voraussichtlich im Juli 2026 erscheinen werden, während Apples lang erwartetes faltbares iPhone wahrscheinlich im September vorgestellt wird. Ich persönlich würde mir daher erst einmal ansehen, was diese Modelle zu bieten haben, bevor ich den Sprung wage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wenn Sie nicht warten können, ist das Honor Magic V6 eine hervorragende Wahl und wird dies wahrscheinlich auch bleiben. Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass Samsung die Akkukapazität übertreffen wird, und ich bezweifle sehr, dass es in puncto Kameraleistung übertroffen wird. Abgesehen von ein paar kleinen Software-Mängeln ist es ein brillantes Smartphone.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Technische Daten</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>MagicOS 10, basierend auf Android 16</li>



<li>Außen: 6,52 Zoll, 1.080 x 2.420, OLED, 120 Hz</li>



<li>Innen: 7,95 Zoll, 2172 × 2352, OLED, 120 Hz</li>



<li>Fingerabdrucksensor im Ein-/Aus-Schalter</li>



<li>Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5</li>



<li>16 GB RAM</li>



<li>512 GB Speicher</li>



<li>Kamera:</li>



<li>50 MP, f/1,6 Hauptkamera</li>



<li>64 MP, f/2,5, 3-fach-Teleobjektiv</li>



<li>50 MP, f/2,2 Ultraweitwinkel</li>



<li>Doppelte 20-MP-Selfie-Kamera mit f/2,2</li>



<li>Videoaufnahmen mit bis zu 4K bei 60 fps (Rückkamera)</li>



<li>Stereolautsprecher</li>



<li>Dual-SIM</li>



<li>WLAN 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7</li>



<li>Bluetooth 6.0</li>



<li>6660-mAh-Akku</li>



<li>80-W-Laden über Kabel</li>



<li>66 W kabelloses Laden</li>



<li>156,7 × 74,5 × 8,8 mm (zusammengeklappt)</li>



<li>IP69-zertifiziert</li>



<li>219 g</li>



<li>Farben: Gold, Rot, Weiß, Schwarz</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3183215/honor-magic-v6-test-review.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3183215/honor-magic-v6-test-review.html" target="_blank">PC-Welt</a>)</p>
</div></div></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ultrahuman Ring Pro im Test: Ohne Abonnement und langlebig]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Mike Sawh



Auf einen Blick



Pro




Insgesamt solide Tracking-Leistung



Ansprechende Begleit-App mit einigen nützlichen Modi



Beeindruckende Akkulaufzeit



Ohne Abonnement




Kontra




Hoher Preis



Klobiges Design



Softwarefunktionen entsprechen weitgehend denen des Air




Fazit

...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694425/it-security-nachrichten/ultrahuman-ring-pro-im-test-ohne-abonnement-und-langlebig/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694425/it-security-nachrichten/ultrahuman-ring-pro-im-test-ohne-abonnement-und-langlebig/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:59:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-23-um-16.11.10.png?w=1024" alt="Ultrahuman Ring Pro" class="wp-image-4200751" width="1024" height="554" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Mike Sawh</p></div>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Auf einen Blick</h3>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Pro</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Insgesamt solide Tracking-Leistung</li>



<li>Ansprechende Begleit-App mit einigen nützlichen Modi</li>



<li>Beeindruckende Akkulaufzeit</li>



<li>Ohne Abonnement</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Kontra</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Hoher Preis</li>



<li>Klobiges Design</li>



<li>Softwarefunktionen entsprechen weitgehend denen des Air</li>
</ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Fazit</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der Ultrahuman Ring Pro bietet ein hervorragendes Hardware- und Software-Erlebnis und zählt damit zu den besten Smart-Ringen. Das Problem ist der hohe Anschaffungspreis, ganz zu schweigen davon, dass die Konkurrenz – sowohl bei Modellen mit als auch ohne Abonnement – für manche Nutzer attraktivere Eigenschaften bieten kann.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der Ultrahuman Ring Pro ist der neueste <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3063681/bester-smart-ring-test.html" target="_blank">Smart-Ring</a> eines Unternehmens, das sich seit Langem im Konflikt mit Oura befindet. Nachdem der Verkauf seines Vorgängermodells in den USA vorübergehend untersagt worden war, kehrt Ultrahuman nun mit einem neuen Ring zurück, der über neu gestaltete Sensoren, eine verbesserte Prozessorleistung und eine längere Akkulaufzeit verfügt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3063689/ultrahuman-ring-air-test-2.html" target="_blank">Ring Air</a> ist weiterhin als günstigere Alternative zum Pro erhältlich, doch wenn Sie das Beste wollen, was Ultrahuman zu bieten hat, ist dieser hier die richtige Wahl.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Leider sind die Preise für die Ringe von Ultrahuman – ähnlich wie bei dem ebenfalls abonnementfreien Konkurrenten RingConn – leicht gestiegen, was bedeutet, dass sich der Pro wirklich hervorheben muss, um die höheren Kosten zu rechtfertigen und zu einer der ersten Wahl unter den Smart-Ringen zu werden.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Design &amp; Verarbeitung</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Erhältlich in vier Farbvarianten</li>



<li>Dickeres Design als der Ring Air</li>



<li>Ladeetui im Lieferumfang enthalten</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der Ring Pro ist ein Smart-Ring mit einem schlichten Design, der in vier verschiedenen Farben erhältlich ist: Bionic Gold, Space Silver, Aster Black und Raw Titanium. Der Kern des Rings besteht aus Titan mit einer PVD-Beschichtung, die ihn vor Kratzern schützt. Ich habe festgestellt, dass frühere Ultrahuman-Ringe zu den am leichtesten zu zerkratzenden gehörten. Daher freue ich mich, dass der Pro Kratzer besser abwehrt.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-23-um-16.11.15.png?w=1024" alt="Ultrahuman Ring Pro" class="wp-image-4200752" width="1024" height="554" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Mike Sawh</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Genau wie der Air ist auch der Pro in den Ringgrößen 5–14 erhältlich und bis zu einer Tiefe von 100 Metern wasserdicht. Ich habe mich für dieselbe Größe wie beim Air entschieden, und die Passform scheint ähnlich zu sein, wenn nicht sogar insgesamt etwas besser, da der Ring seltener an meinem Finger herumrutscht. Er ist sehr bequem und sitzt gut am Finger. Man spürt zwar die Sensoren, doch sie sind nicht so deutlich spürbar wie bei früheren Modellen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Im Vergleich zum Ring Air von Ultrahuman erhalten Sie einen schwereren und dickeren Ring. Da ich den <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3179739/oura-ring-5-test-review.html" target="_blank">Oura Ring 5</a> gleichzeitig getragen habe, wirkt der Pro deutlich größer als der neueste Ring von Oura.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der Pro wird mit einem Ladecase geliefert, und obwohl man es nicht mit dem neuen Case von Oura verwechseln würde, verfügt es über ein ähnlich robustes Metall-Design, das den Ring schützt, wenn er nicht am Finger getragen wird. Das Etui verfügt über zusätzliche intelligente Funktionen wie kabelloses Laden, einen „Find-my-Case“-Modus für den Fall, dass Sie es verlegen, ganz zu schweigen von der Möglichkeit, Ringdaten bis zu einem Jahr lang zu speichern.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ein interessanter Aspekt des Designs ist, dass Ultrahuman den Ring so konzipiert hat, dass er im Falle einer Schwellung leicht durchtrennt und entfernt werden kann. Auch wenn ich hoffe, dass niemand jemals in eine solche Situation gerät, ist es beruhigend zu wissen, dass sich der Ring in einem Notfall problemlos entfernen lässt.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Fitness &amp; Tracking</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Überarbeitete Temperatur- und Herzfrequenzsensoren</li>



<li>Neuer Dual-Core-Prozessor</li>



<li>Powerplugs bieten zusätzliche Funktionen gegen Aufpreis</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Der Ring Pro kann so gut wie alles überwachen, was auch der Air kann. Dazu gehören Herzfrequenz, Schlaf, Stress, Temperatur und die tägliche Schrittzahl. Die größte Änderung besteht darin, dass die optischen Sensoren, die zur Erfassung dieser Messwerte verwendet werden, überarbeitet wurden und nun klarere Signale liefern, um Schlaf- und Erholungsdaten zu erfassen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Diese Neugestaltung scheint zudem mit den Patentstreitigkeiten mit Oura in Zusammenhang zu stehen.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-23-um-16.11.19.png?w=1024" alt="Ultrahuman Ring Pro" class="wp-image-4200753" width="1024" height="554" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Mike Sawh</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die App, die diese Daten anzeigt, gehört zu den ausgereiftesten, die Sie bei einem Smart-Ring finden können. Sie steht der Oura-App in nichts nach, was die ansprechende Aufbereitung Ihrer Daten angeht, und regt Sie dazu an, sich tatsächlich damit auseinanderzusetzen.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-23-um-16.11.33.png?w=1024" alt="Ultrahuman Ring Pro" class="wp-image-4200754" width="1024" height="571" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Mike Sawh</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Was die Erfassung der Kerndaten angeht, müssen Sie die zweiwöchige Kalibrierungsphase unbedingt durchlaufen, bis Sie zuverlässige Ergebnisse erhalten. Die Daten zu den durchschnittlichen Herzfrequenzwerten wiesen während dieses Zeitraums erhebliche Abweichungen auf, stabilisierten sich jedoch nach diesen zwei Wochen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Daten zur Ruheherzfrequenz und die Messungen der Herzfrequenzvariabilität stimmten besonders gut mit zwei anderen Trackern überein, die ich parallel zum Pro trug.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bei der Betrachtung der Schrittzahlen stellte ich fest, dass die gemeldeten Gesamtwerte deutlich niedriger waren als bei zwei anderen Trackern, mit denen ich den Pro verglichen habe.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Leistung bei der Schlafaufzeichnung gehört zu den besten, die ich getestet habe, einschließlich Oura. Was die Schlafdauer, die Aufschlüsselung der Schlafphasen und den erfassten Zeitpunkt des Einschlafens betrifft, lieferte der Pro zuverlässige Werte.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-23-um-16.11.42.png?w=1024" alt="Ultrahuman Ring Pro" class="wp-image-4200755" width="1024" height="543" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Mike Sawh</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultrahuman hebt sich von der Konkurrenz dadurch ab, dass es komplexe Daten in einem leicht verständlichen Format darstellt, beispielsweise bei der Bewertung des Gehirnalters oder der Erfassung des Schlafdefizits, das sich aus kumulierten schlechten Nächten ergibt. Es überwacht zudem, wie gut Ihr Gehirn während des Schlafs Abfallstoffe abbaut. Sie können auch die „PowerPlugs“ von Ultrahuman erkunden, bei denen es sich größtenteils um kostenlose Add-ons handelt, die eine individuellere Nachverfolgung ermöglichen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ich nutze derzeit das neue Parent-Modul, das besonders auf die kumulative Erholung achtet, berücksichtigt, dass der Schlaf wahrscheinlich unruhiger ist, und Ihnen Tipps gibt, wie Sie wieder in die richtige Bahn kommen können.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" src="https://b2b-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Bildschirmfoto-2026-07-23-um-16.11.49.png?w=1024" alt="Ultrahuman Ring Pro" class="wp-image-4200756" width="1024" height="577" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"></figure><p class="imageCredit">Mike Sawh</p></div>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wie bereits erwähnt, sind die meisten dieser PowerPlugs kostenlos. Es gibt jedoch auch solche, die Einblicke in spezielle Krankheiten wie Migräne bieten oder Daten mit einem Tesla synchronisieren; hierfür ist ein monatliches Abonnement erforderlich. Dabei handelt es sich um kostenpflichtige Funktionen, auf die die meisten Nutzer gut verzichten können.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Akkulaufzeit &amp; Aufladen</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Bis zu 15 Tage Akkulaufzeit</li>



<li>Bietet drei Akkubetriebsmodi</li>



<li>Ladeetui sorgt für weitere 45 Tage</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die Akkulaufzeit ist ein wichtiges Thema beim Pro-Modell – und das nicht nur, weil er länger durchhält als der Air. Neben der Verlängerung der Akkulaufzeit von 4–6 Tagen auf 15 Tage stehen Ihnen drei Akkubetriebsmodi zur Verfügung, mit denen Sie das Beste aus jeder Ladung herausholen können.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wenn Sie den Turbo-Modus wählen, bei dem alle Sensoren aktiviert sind, können Sie mit einer Laufzeit von bis zu 12 Tagen rechnen. Diese verlängert sich auf über 15 Tage, wenn Sie sich für den Chill-Akkumodus entscheiden. Dabei liegt der Schwerpunkt auf der Schlafaufzeichnung, doch wichtige Momente Ihres Tages werden weiterhin erfasst, um sicherzustellen, dass die wesentlichen Erkenntnisse weiterhin von Nutzen sind.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ich habe mit dem Pro problemlos eine Akkulaufzeit von fast zwei Wochen erreicht, was eine beeindruckende Leistung ist. Das ist besser als beim Oura Ring 5 und liegt in Bezug auf die Akkuleistung auf Augenhöhe mit dem <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3063223/ringconn-gen-2-test.html" target="_blank">RingConn Gen 2</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zudem verfügen Sie nun über das Ladecase, das Ihnen eine zusätzliche Akkulaufzeit von 45 Tagen bietet. Sie müssen den Ring jedoch präzise im Ladegerät platzieren; ein akustisches Signal aus dem integrierten Lautsprecher bestätigt, dass der Ring wieder aufgeladen wird. Als der Akku auf 0 Prozent sank, benötigte der Pro weniger als eine Stunde, um wieder auf 100 Prozent zu kommen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Preis &amp; Verfügbarkeit</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zum Zeitpunkt der Erstellung dieses Artikels kann der Ultrahuman Ring Pro für 499 Euro im <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3181848/ultrahuman-ring-pro-test-review.html#" target="_blank">Ultrahuman Store</a> vorbestellt werden. Damit gehört er zu den teuersten Smart-Ringen auf dem Markt.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Er ist teurer als das günstigste verfügbare Modell des Oura Ring 5 und andere Smart-Ringe wie der <a href="https://whttps//www.pcwelt.de/article/3062918/samsung-galaxy-ring-test.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Samsung Galaxy Ring</a>. Der in Kürze erscheinende RingConn Gen 3 wird in den USA teurer sein als der Ring Pro, sollte in anderen Regionen jedoch günstiger sein.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Wie der Ring Air bleibt auch der Pro ein Smart-Ring ohne Abonnement. Einige der PowerPlug-Software-Erweiterungen sind jedoch mit zusätzlichen Kosten verbunden.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Sollten Sie den Ultrahuman Ring Pro kaufen?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Die großen Verbesserungen des Ring Pro gegenüber dem Air liegen in dem größeren Akku und dem robusteren Design. Ich habe die Überwachungsleistung des Air nie als unzureichend empfunden, und wenn Sie noch ein Exemplar ergattern können und ein Fan des Software-Ansatzes von Ultrahuman sind, dann ist er nach wie vor eine kluge (und günstigere) Anschaffung.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Vergleicht man den Ring Pro mit anderen Smart-Ringen, müssen wir über den Preis sprechen. Er ist teuer, und es gibt abonnementsfreie Alternativen zu einem günstigeren Preis. Ob diese Ihnen auf der Softwareseite das gleiche Maß an Sorgfalt und Aufmerksamkeit bieten, ist fraglich. Genau hier setzt sich der Ring Pro gegenüber einem Großteil der Konkurrenz durch.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Er ist vielleicht nicht der kleinste oder dünnste Ring, aber was der Ring Pro zu bieten hat, ist eine Kombination aus Hardware und Software, die ein hervorragendes Gesamtpaket ergibt.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Technische Daten</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Bis zu 15 Tage Akkulaufzeit</li>



<li>Kompatibel mit Android und iOS</li>



<li>Wasserdicht bis zu 100 Metern</li>



<li>2,65 mm dick</li>



<li>Gewicht: 3,3–4,8 g</li>



<li>Erfasst den Blutsauerstoffgehalt, die Herzfrequenz und die Körpertemperatur</li>



<li>Erfasst den Schlaf und die tägliche Aktivität</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">(<a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3181848/ultrahuman-ring-pro-test-review.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3181848/ultrahuman-ring-pro-test-review.html" target="_blank">PC-Welt</a>)</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[DeepSeek Just Solved AI's Billion Dollar Problem]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[YouTube Video]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694423/it-security-nachrichten/deepseek-just-solved-ais-billion-dollar-problem/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694423/it-security-nachrichten/deepseek-just-solved-ais-billion-dollar-problem/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:59:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube Video</p><p><iframe loading="lazy" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/mG4SmhWyeFA"></iframe></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI success requires a full-stack CIO]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Every CIO I speak with today is wrestling with some version of the same question: How do we move faster with AI and deliver on our commitments?



It’s an understandable concern. Boards and CEOs are asking about AI. Business leaders are experimenting with use cases. Employees are discovering tool...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694399/it-security-nachrichten/ai-success-requires-a-full-stack-cio/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694399/it-security-nachrichten/ai-success-requires-a-full-stack-cio/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:57:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every CIO I speak with today is wrestling with some version of the same question: How do we move faster with AI and deliver on our commitments?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s an understandable concern. <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4171959/ceos-top-priorities-for-it-leaders-today-2.html">Boards and CEOs are asking about AI</a>. Business leaders are experimenting with use cases. Employees are discovering tools daily, while technology vendors promise unprecedented gains in productivity, innovation, and competitive advantage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After hundreds of conversations with technology executives over the past year, I’ve become convinced that speed isn’t the real issue. The organizations pulling away from the pack aren’t necessarily adopting AI faster than everyone else. They’re executing more effectively — a subtle distinction that represents one of the defining leadership challenges of the AI era.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Technology has never been the hardest part of transformation. People, priorities, culture, and operating models are the biggest challenges. The ability to translate bold boardroom aspirations into thousands of thoughtful decisions made every day by architects, engineers, product managers, analysts, and business leaders is where competitive advantage is created. AI may be accelerating the pace of change, but it hasn’t changed that fundamental truth.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve met plenty of executives who are exceptional in the boardroom. They know how to frame a vision, <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/272180/relationship-building-networking-how-to-wow-your-board-of-directors.html">influence a board</a>, and build confidence among investors and business leaders. I’ve also met remarkable technologists who instinctively understand the architectural decisions, engineering tradeoffs, and implementation details that determine how great ideas become reality. Modern CIOs, however, must move comfortably between both worlds. Afshean Talasaz is one who stands out among this rare breed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Long before becoming CIO of Colonial Pipeline, Talasaz built his career from the ground up as a business professional, data scientist, and technologist. He has designed enterprise platforms, built AI capabilities, led technology organizations, and partnered closely with executive leadership teams on business transformation. Today, as an executive in residence with our Practitioners for Practitioners (P4P) community, he helps CIOs and business leaders navigate one of the most significant technology shifts of our generation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While Talasaz brings deep knowledge of data and AI to the table, his greatest strength is his ability to create strategy and connect it with execution. He can spend the morning discussing enterprise reinvention with the board and the afternoon debating architectural principles with the teams responsible for bringing that vision to life.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That versatility gives Talasaz a unique lens on how CIOs <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178006/state-of-the-cio-2026-cios-set-the-course-for-ai-roi.html">can deliver value with AI</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Software companies have a term for engineers who understand every layer of the technology stack: full-stack developers. Listen to Talasaz and it becomes evident that the AI era requires something similar from technology leaders: a full-stack CIO.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The full-stack CIO: Leading with clarity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A full-stack CIO understands how every layer of the enterprise influences the next. They recognize that every strategic priority becomes a portfolio investment, every investment shapes an operating model, every operating model influences architecture, every architecture choice informs product decisions, every product decision shapes engineering priorities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best CIOs understand both ends of that journey. The extraordinary ones understand everything in between.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And those who execute best lead with clarity, Talasaz says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Everyone, from executives to middle managers to the people writing code, should be able to explain what we’re trying to achieve,” he emphasizes. “Clarity isn’t that we’ve handed out the PowerPoint. It’s that people genuinely understand where we’re going and can articulate it in their own language.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the unintended consequences of the AI boom is that organizations are beginning to confuse activity with alignment. They have AI councils, AI governance committees, AI innovation labs, AI centers of excellence, AI pilots, and AI roadmaps. Yet if you stop ten people in the hallway and ask a deceptively simple question, What business problem are we actually trying to solve? you’ll often hear ten different answers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a result, architects optimize for one objective while product teams optimize for another. Business units pursue opportunities that seem perfectly reasonable from their perspective. Engineers make thoughtful technical decisions based on the information available to them. Individually, none of those decisions are necessarily wrong. Collectively, however, they create organizational drift. AI doesn’t create that problem. It simply accelerates the consequences.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And while AI can be a force multiplier for the positive when every decision is guided by a shared understanding of where the organization is headed, it can also be a force multiplier for the negative, resulting in an organization simply moving faster in different directions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When we have the fundamentals right, the tech infrastructure, the operating models, the nuances of how our business actually runs, we get the impacts of AI in a positive way,” Talasaz says. “When we don’t have those in place, AI can amplify the gaps or mute the benefits.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At a time when so much of the conversation surrounding AI is focused on algorithms, agents, and automation, it’s an important reminder that organizations don’t execute strategy; people do.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Reducing organizational friction</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most executives are familiar with the concept of VUCA that characterizes today’s business environment. But Talasaz stresses the importance of turning this concern inward: “If the world outside our organizations is becoming more volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous, what are we, as leaders, doing to the inside of our organizations?”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Leaders spend enormous amounts of time helping their organizations respond to external disruption but comparatively little time asking whether they are inadvertently re-creating those same conditions internally in response to those external needs. Are we reducing uncertainty or introducing more of it? Are we simplifying work or adding unnecessary complexity? Are we helping people focus on what matters most, or asking them to navigate competing priorities and shifting expectations?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Talasaz refers to this phenomenon as double VUCA — something I’ve witnessed repeatedly while working with CIOs over the past decade. Organizations often assume they’re struggling because of technology limitations when the real constraint is organizational friction. Teams wait for decisions. Priorities shift faster than roadmaps. Governance grows heavier. New committees are formed to solve problems created by existing committees. Everyone is working harder, yet the organization somehow feels slower.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI amplifies both outcomes. Organizations with clarity become dramatically more effective because AI accelerates good decisions. Organizations without clarity simply accelerate confusion.</p>



<h1 class="wp-block-heading">Operating model as strategy enabler</h1>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI governance is one way to achieve greater clarity, but as Talasaz says, governance shouldn’t primarily exist inside policy manuals that few people read.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Instead, AI governance should be embedded in the daily rhythms of the organization, shaping how teams collaborate, how decisions are made, how products move from ideas into production, and how innovation happens safely without requiring constant escalation. In other words, it’s all about your operating model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“If you had to pick one thing that isn’t technology, your operating model is the most important element for executing data and AI at scale,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best operating models create enough clarity that capable people can make thousands of decisions independently and confidently, without having to wait for permission. By embedding good governance into the way it works, the organization becomes faster.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This advice echoes something I’ve heard repeatedly from some of the world’s most respected CIOs: High-performing organizations aren’t built on tighter control; they’re built on greater trust, supported by clear principles, shared expectations, and operating models that enable responsible decision-making at every level of the enterprise.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Talasaz points out that technology leaders tend to speak in terms of <em>transformation</em>. He suggests CIOs consider a different word: <em>reinvention.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As he explains, transformation implies replacing what exists today with something new. Reinvention starts with a more clear-eyed and practical premise: Some things absolutely must change; others represent years, sometimes decades, of accumulated expertise, customer trust, operational discipline, and competitive advantage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Reinvention is about building on those strengths while also creating new ways to deliver value. The leaders making the greatest progress in their AI journeys seem to recognize that it’s less about abandoning the past than thoughtfully preparing the organization for the future.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Closing the gap between strategy and execution</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Full-stack CIOs must be able to map out the various layers of execution and planning that need to be done at every level of the organization to be successful. To help with this, Talasaz has developed a data and AI framework that draws on his own experiences “from the keyboard to the boardroom.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As Talasaz sees it, too many organizations have been doing good work in isolation. “They’re doing a lot of the right things,” he says. “They’re just not connected.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Boards may be discussing growth while business leaders redesign customer experiences. Product teams may be prioritizing new capabilities while architects modernize platforms. Data teams may be improving quality while engineers focus on delivery. Every group makes meaningful progress within its own domain, yet somewhere between strategy and execution, the connective tissue begins to disappear. Talasaz’s framework brings those connecting points to the forefront.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Crucially, the framework doesn’t begin with technology or AI or even with data. It begins with the experiences the organization hopes to create for its customers, employees, or partners. Many AI initiatives start with the question, “What can this technology do?” And indeed, we need to be inspired by the possibilities and challenged to think differently by what the technology can do. But, Talasaz emphasizes, we also need to ask what experiences we need to deliver for our business and how the technology can make that a reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The framework challenges CIOs to answer that question first. Only after the experiences are clearly defined does the conversation move to the capabilities required to deliver it, the business activities that support those capabilities, the AI and data products that enable them, and finally the data foundation that makes everything possible.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This shift in perspective ensures that, rather than allowing technology investments to search for business value, the business experience defines the technology required to deliver it. For CIOs, that’s more than a planning exercise. It’s a fundamentally different way of leading.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Over the coming months, the P4P community will be convening a series of small CxO roundtables to explore these issues and work more deeply with Afshean Talasaz’s 6×6 Data and AI Framework. CIOs and other enterprise leaders interested in participating are welcome to <a href="mailto:droberts@ouellette-online.com?subject=P4P:%206x6%20Framework%20Roundtable">reach out to me directly</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sovereign AI has become the public-sector CIO’s control problem]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In public-sector and regulated-cloud work, I learned that sovereignty rarely starts as a national strategy. It starts as an auditor’s question: Who can prove where the data went, which system made the decision and what changes when the vendor or infrastructure does? That question is now moving in...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694400/it-security-nachrichten/sovereign-ai-has-become-the-public-sector-cios-control-problem/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694400/it-security-nachrichten/sovereign-ai-has-become-the-public-sector-cios-control-problem/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:57:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In public-sector and regulated-cloud work, I learned that sovereignty rarely starts as a national strategy. It starts as an auditor’s question: Who can prove where the data went, which system made the decision and what changes when the vendor or infrastructure does? That question is now moving into AI, and most sovereign-AI debates answer the wrong version of it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They ask whether a country can build its own model on domestic data and hardware. For the United States and China, which together hold more than 90% of global AI data-center capacity, per a <a href="https://institute.global/insights/tech-and-digitalisation/sovereignty-in-the-age-of-ai-strategic-choices-structural-dependencies">January 2026 Tony Blair Institute analysis</a>, that question is worth asking. However, for almost every other government, it is the wrong place to start. The operative question is narrower: Once AI is embedded in public services, who controls the stack?</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The 5 layers of public-sector control</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For a CIO, sovereign AI means enforceable control across the AI lifecycle; model ownership is a separate question. Control has five layers:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Data control:</strong> Where sensitive public data sits, and whether it can train a vendor’s model.</li>



<li><strong>Model control:</strong> Which models clear which workloads, and under what validation.</li>



<li><strong>Infrastructure control:</strong> Whether critical workloads run in approved environments.</li>



<li><strong>Operational control:</strong> Whether AI-assisted actions are logged, monitored and reversible.</li>



<li><strong>Vendor control:</strong> Whether the agency keeps portability, audit rights and a real exit.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those five layers are the control plane for public-service AI. Floyd Dcosta recently made the enterprise case in “<a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4147102/ai-without-sovereignty-is-just-outsourced-intelligence.html">AI without sovereignty is just outsourced intelligence</a>”: capability is what a tool can do; authority over how and when it does it is something a buyer can quietly lose. For public services, losing that authority plays out in the public eye.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Public-sector AI risk differs from enterprise risk. A retailer’s bad recommendation costs a sale; a government’s AI touches benefits, tax enforcement, policing and emergency response, raising the bar to due process, records retention and continuity of operations. A government that cannot reconstruct an AI-assisted decision lacks operational sovereignty, even in a domestic data center.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Evaluating risk: Concentration, jurisdiction and shadow AI</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Foreign dependency is a real risk, but the exposure that matters is a sudden cutoff: A model you cannot audit, switch or exit, shut off by someone else’s order. A vendor’s nationality is a poor guide to that risk; control is.  Two markers matter. The first is concentration. In July 2024, a single faulty CrowdStrike update <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/alerts/2024/07/19/widespread-it-outage-due-crowdstrike-update">crashed about 8.5 million Windows machines</a>, disrupting airlines, hospitals, banks and governments worldwide. No attacker was involved; one homogeneous dependency failed everywhere at once. The lesson points away from vendor nationality and toward uniformity as the fault line, making portability and provider diversity resilience controls.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The second is jurisdiction. In June 2025, Microsoft’s legal director for France <a href="https://www.sdxcentral.com/news/microsoft-tells-french-lawmakers-it-cant-protect-user-data-from-us-demands/">told a Senate inquiry, under oath</a>, that it could not guarantee that French public-sector data, even in French data centers, would be protected against US demands under the 2018 CLOUD Act. No such request had been made, and EU data has stayed in the EU since January 2025; senators called the assurance purely declarative. For the most sensitive data, residency does not equal control; the parent’s jurisdiction can matter as much as the server’s. Three US hyperscalers hold <a href="https://www.srgresearch.com/articles/european-cloud-providers-local-market-share-now-holds-steady-at-15">about 70% of the European cloud market</a>, while European providers’ share fell from 29% in 2017 to roughly 15%. Concentration plus jurisdiction is the exposure a CIO must price. I have watched teams treat vendor selection as the moment risk was solved; it rarely was.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The wrong response is self-isolation. Most countries will never build frontier models, advanced chips, hyperscale clouds and talent pipelines at once; the Tony Blair Institute calls full self-sufficiency “too expensive, too slow and, for most countries, simply impossible.” The better test is workload sensitivity. Low-risk uses, such as drafting, translation and summarization, can run on commercial platforms with controls; high-risk uses, such as benefits eligibility, fraud investigation and healthcare triage, demand stricter control over data, model behavior and auditability.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mandating domestic-only provision before a competitive option exists inverts sovereignty. <a href="https://europe2031.ai/summary">Europe 2031</a>, a five-year scenario from June 2026 by European technologists and policy researchers, illustrates the failure mode: A 2027 “buy European” mandate lands as offensive cyber capability spreads, and agencies that switched to weaker providers are locked out and paying ransoms. The scenario is fiction; the mechanism is not. Leverage comes from being indispensable, not half-hearted self-sufficiency. The closer-to-home effect is shadow AI: Mandate an inferior sanctioned tool and staff bypass it, the way shadow IT grows up around tools people find too slow. A rule that pushes sensitive work into ungoverned shadow AI reduces control instead of adding it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Regulation and data-residency rules belong in any serious strategy, but carry failure modes. Blanket localization raises hosting costs and slows adoption without guaranteeing control, and a “sovereign cloud” on a foreign parent’s stack can amount to sovereignty theater. The more useful pattern tiers requirements by sensitivity. India’s BHASHINI shows the application layer done well: A public platform <a href="https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=2093333&amp;reg=3&amp;lang=2">serving 100 million-plus inferences a month across 22-plus languages</a> on a vendor- and cloud-agnostic design that keeps data and switching rights public. Sovereignty resides in the portability, not in a national model.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Building an operational sovereignty strategy</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Public trust is the constraint sovereignty rhetoric tends to skip. The OECD’s <a href="https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/governing-with-artificial-intelligence_795de142-en.html">2025 review of government AI</a> warns that opaque systems make AI-assisted decisions hard to explain and can give public servants false confidence in tools that fail quietly. State-controlled AI is the same problem from the other side: A government that deploys models against its own citizens without audit or record has gained control and lost accountability. An agency that can log, explain and reverse an AI-assisted action can defend it to citizens, courts, auditors and elected officials. If it cannot, it has bought access and called it sovereignty.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this is new. AI sovereignty repeats earlier fights over cloud, telecom, semiconductors and cybersecurity. Europe’s flagship cloud project, GAIA-X, became a cautionary tale; the Dutch technologist Bert Hubert called it an <a href="https://berthub.eu/articles/posts/gaia-x-is-an-expensive-distraction/">“expensive distraction”</a> that produced no European cloud, the familiar result of ambition without absorptive capacity. Cloud taught governments that outsourcing infrastructure does not outsource accountability; telecom, that vendor dependency becomes strategic exposure; chips, that supply chains matter before a crisis; cybersecurity, that trust must be verified continuously. AI inherits all four at once.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over the next five to ten years, some countries will build national platforms, more will build trusted cloud and trusted model regimes, and most will run hybrids that pair domestic data control with global model access. Trade policy will harden those choices: Export controls on compute and data-localization rules will pull the vendor market into blocs that track alliances more than open markets. For a CIO, that turns a vendor and hosting decision into a five-year bet on whose rules and supply chains will still hold. The ones that succeed will treat sovereignty as an operating requirement, backed by leverage, not a slogan. Start with the control plane before the model: Most agencies will never own the model, and the controls are what decide whether the AI they do run stays accountable. Even when procurement policy is dictated from above, these questions remain within the CIO’s authority:</p>



<ol start="1" class="wp-block-list">
<li>Can we classify AI workloads by public-service risk?</li>



<li>Can we prove where sensitive data goes across training, retrieval, inference, logging and retention?</li>



<li>Can we restrict which models are approved for which data classes and functions?</li>



<li>Can we reconstruct an AI-assisted action in enough detail to explain it?</li>



<li>Can we change providers without losing continuity or institutional knowledge?</li>



<li>Can we explain the system to citizens, regulators, auditors and elected officials?</li>
</ol>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A “no” to any of these does not mean the agency lacks AI. It means the agency has access it does not yet control. Public institutions can use global innovation without surrendering public authority, but only once they know what to hold, what to rent and where dependency turns into risk.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Principles every enterprise must test before the attack arrives]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[I haven’t slept much in the past few weeks. Not because of some theoretical cyber risk that keeps many executives awake, but because reality just delivered a real wake-up call to our industry — a call that every executive must answer, now.



Imagine this: A major global enterprise, a company mos...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694398/it-security-nachrichten/principles-every-enterprise-must-test-before-the-attack-arrives/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694398/it-security-nachrichten/principles-every-enterprise-must-test-before-the-attack-arrives/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I haven’t slept much in the past few weeks. Not because of some theoretical cyber risk that keeps many executives awake, but because reality just delivered a real wake-up call to our industry — a call that every executive must answer, now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Imagine this: A major global enterprise, a company most of us interact with indirectly every single day, wakes up to find its entire digital environment obliterated. Thousands of employees in dozens of offices and remote locations are suddenly offline. Customers are cut off, supply chains grind to a halt and regulators are notified with a chilling admission: “We have no idea when we’ll be back.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This wasn’t ransomware. There was no negotiation, no decryption key to buy, no easy way out. It was destruction — deliberate, coordinated and geopolitically motivated — not monetary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a chief customer officer who’s worked with countless customers on cyberattack risks, my perspective hits a bit differently than a CISO or a CTO. I see the aftermath, not just the attack surface. I see the faces behind the tickets, the operations team locked out of their own systems, the support agent answering panicked calls at dawn. And I ask: How many organizations have actually stress-tested their response to this scenario — not a hypothetical, but this very real, lights-out event? Here’s what every leader needs to confront today:</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Recovery is not just a technical exercise</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first assumption to break during a real crisis is <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4165019/your-cloud-strategy-is-incomplete-without-a-cyber-recovery-plan.html">the belief that recovery is purely technical</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many organizations have done tabletop exercises and have a backup and recovery playbook, so they feel prepared. They can <a>point to</a> backup windows, retention schedules and immutability controls. The moment a true blackout happens, a different reality surfaces. The people who own the recovery steps either do not know each other, lack the authority to make decisions without supervisor approval or need guidance from offline systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The reality is that technical infrastructure almost always holds up better than human infrastructure. Organizations have built their recovery strategy around the assumption that someone competent will be awake, available and empowered when a cyber event happens.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Still, backups are only as good as their independence. Let’s be blunt: If your recovery infrastructure shares identity, authentication or network trust with your Microsoft tenant (such as Azure, Microsoft 365 or Teams), you don’t actually have a recovery plan; you have a false sense of one — and a liability. A <a href="https://www.veeam.com/company/press-release/veeam-report-reveals-a-market-wide-shift-from-recovery-confidence-to-proven-data-resilience-amid-ransomware-threats-and-ai-adoption.html">recent survey</a> found that while 90% of organizations express confidence in their ability to recover from a cyber incident, fewer than one in three ransomware victims fully recovered their data.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">True resilience means immutable, air-gapped backups, untouchable by the same compromise. Anything less is an illusion. I talk to customers about their recovery plans constantly. The customers who have rehearsed all scenarios sleep soundly. Those who haven’t? They’re rolling the dice.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Most business continuity plans ignore ‘total blackout’</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve reviewed hundreds of business continuity plans. Almost all assume partial failures — a region, an application, a data center. But what if every system, in every country, goes dark simultaneously? That’s an entirely different playbook. If your team hasn’t run a drill for a global, simultaneous outage, you’re not prepared. The probability is low, but the cost of being unready is existential.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Connected devices, OT systems, field hardware, partner integrations — they all plug into your enterprise network. When the core collapses, it’s not just IT at risk. It’s operational technology, physical safety systems and in regulated sectors, potentially human lives. Understanding and testing those interdependencies is non-negotiable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is also where boards need to change the conversation. A <a href="https://www.diligent.com/resources/research/cybersecurity-audit">study found</a> that only 5% of companies have cybersecurity experts on their board of directors. Recovery time objectives (RTOs) should not be buried in technical appendices. It’s all jargon to boards. That makes translation essential. RTOs must be explained in terms of business impact. “We can recover in four hours” is a technical statement. “Every hour of downtime costs us $2.3M and creates regulatory exposure in three jurisdictions” is a board statement.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the level of clarity leaders need.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most prepared organizations do not wait for an incident to educate the board. They bring the conversation forward proactively. They frame recovery in business terms: revenue, regulatory standing, customer trust and brand reputation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most effective framing is often simple. Show the most critical systems. Show what happens if each one is down for one hour, four hours, 24 hours and 72 hours. Show the current recovery capability against each and then show the gap.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If your board is not demanding real answers, your business continuity strategy is likely underfunded and your business is exposed. This is a risk conversation worth forcing because the consequences do not stay inside IT. They can show up in customer churn or missed revenue and ruin an organization’s reputation.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Threat intelligence must be actionable, not archived</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Geopolitical attacks, hacktivist campaigns and nation-state targeting aren’t abstract threats. They are active risks, and that intelligence cannot languish in the security team’s inbox. Executive leadership must be looped in — and immediately — so gaps can be closed before they’re exploited. Too often, intelligence enters the security operations function and never reaches the teams responsible for recovery infrastructure or executive decision-making.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If a threat actor is targeting a specific class of backup agents, the team responsible for those agents needs to know now, not two weeks from now. If intelligence suggests destructive activity against a sector, recovery owners need to validate isolation, access paths and restoration procedures immediately. If geopolitical tension increases the likelihood of targeting, executive leadership needs to understand what exposure exists and what actions are being taken. The organizations that survive aren’t just the best at incident response. They’re the ones who anticipated, rehearsed and invested <em>before</em> the attack.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Part of investing in a recovery strategy requires closing the loop between signal and action. The most prepared organizations have already mapped their critical recovery dependencies to specific threat categories. When intelligence touches one of those categories, there is a named owner and a clear set of actions. No guessing or forwarding emails into the void is needed because the distance between the warning and the employees’ ability to do something is shortened.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking ahead, the conversation will continue to evolve beyond traditional cyber response. Because in an AI-enabled enterprise, the new question is whether the data within those systems can still be trusted. When AI systems make decisions based on enterprise data, the attack surface becomes the data’s accuracy. A threat actor who quietly corrupts a dataset over 90 days before a recovery event has done more damage than just downtime. They can poison the inputs driving decisions across the business.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Regardless of how AI will change threat intelligence and cyber response, these principles remain the same. Know your problem, whether structural or technological. Ensure your human infrastructure keeps pace with your technical infrastructure, with clear cross-functional ownership and the tools and knowledge to act autonomously. Communicate with your boards often — and correctly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let’s not wait for the next headline to ask, “Are we ready?” Have those conversations <em>now</em>. Test your assumptions. Close your gaps. Because in today’s threat landscape, resilience isn’t IT’s job — it’s everyone’s mandate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Smaller, smarter, safer: How to build agentic AI on the right foundation]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[When it comes to building an effective AI stack, context is king and power isn’t everything it’s cracked up to be.



“Smaller, smarter, safer — this is a bet our company has taken in how we deploy AI internally,” said Ricky Thakrar, head of sales and account management at Zoho, provider of a sui...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694397/it-security-nachrichten/smaller-smarter-safer-how-to-build-agentic-ai-on-the-right-foundation/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694397/it-security-nachrichten/smaller-smarter-safer-how-to-build-agentic-ai-on-the-right-foundation/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When it comes to building an effective AI stack, context is king and power isn’t everything it’s cracked up to be.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Smaller, smarter, safer — this is a bet our company has taken in how we deploy AI internally,” said Ricky Thakrar, head of sales and account management at Zoho, provider of a suite of popular cloud-based software solutions for sales, marketing, and finance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“I’m on the business side, and so decisions made by our CIO and IT folks affect me directly, and my teams’ workflows and processes,” he added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Speaking to a room of tech leaders at the <a href="https://event.foundryco.com/cio-100-leadership-live-new-york/">CIO 100 Leadership Live New York event</a> last week, Thakrar explained that every company wants the speed of AI-generated work wedded to the quality of human work, even though these two are diametrically opposed. No amount of model upgrades or spend will close that gap, so the only way forward is to architect your way out. Thakrar encapsulated this idea in a simple formula:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Smaller: Stop deploying maximum firepower on every task. Many tasks don’t need it.</li>



<li>Smarter: The system around the model decides more than the model does.</li>



<li>Safer: Verify at the point a mistake gets locked in, not just downstream of it.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He noted that organizations that win with AI won’t be those deploying the biggest, most powerful models or the most sophisticated architecture, but the ones that figure out that the model is the easy part and the right architecture is harder. That means understanding the hardest element, and the biggest differentiator, is building a human system that learns and compounds alongside agentic systems.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To get it right, organizations need to prioritize the context layer. The size of frontier models like the GPT series, Claude, and Gemini mostly exist to compensate for missing context, Thakrar explained. Without enough context, models need to be able to reason harder and infer more about what a user actually means because it doesn’t know the user’s account, process, or history. A rich context layer makes it possible for enterprises to run workloads on much smaller, lower-power models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The intelligence moves from the model into the architecture around it,” he said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A steep learning curve</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of Zoho’s earliest AI agents was a churn management agent to help the account management team detect churn in customer subscriptions. So when a subscription became inactive, the agent would collect context from notes, meeting recordings, and Zoho’s data enrichment tool, then create a summary of reasons the account might have churned, and schedule a call.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“What happened was I got this churn agent a couple months later, already embedded in our CRM, and within a week my team no longer trusted that agent,” Thakrar said. “The reason is we forgot to collect one very key point.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In Zoho’s CRM, when a customer buys a bundle of products, that bundle is represented as a single line item. That means the status of any products the customer may have previously purchased individually changes to inactive as they’re moved to the bundle. That’s not churn, but it was interpreted it that way. Zoho fixed it in the second version of the agent.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then a new problem arose. Many potential customers first purchase Zoho products as pilots or sandboxes. As those customers move from pilot to live instance, they close down the pilot versions. And again, the CRM would record that as subscriptions going inactive.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The trust deteriorates again because everyone got excited for version 2,” Thakrar said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sometimes, a certain product might not be the best fit for a customer and Thakrar’s team will suggest the customer move to another product. That’s deliberate churn, not a churn risk.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You may have a similar story like this where the agent sounds so good, it’s going to do something quick and add value, but it’s missing context from the account managers, and there are so many more pieces we’re still building out,” Thakrar said. “It’s been almost a year and the problem I have is my team still doesn’t trust it. They’ll see [a message from the agent] and go out and do all the research anyway to make sure it gave the correct answer.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The team is more on top of potential churn, though, but the promised productivity gains have yet to materialize because the agent has to earn back lost trust due to a lack of context.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“My goal for this year is having an AI-assisted customer journey from sales to account management where the handoff is clean, the context flows, and every piece of information we gather about a customer is weighed, identified, and coached so the sales team can close more deals,” he said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Zoho’s early experience with agents has led to the idea that constrained, context-rich, deterministic architectures consistently outperform expensive models bolted onto fragmented systems. It all comes down to three pillars: routing, harness, and specialization.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Routing</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Routing is about sending workloads to the proper model for the job, which entails providing enough context to a given task that a small, cheap model can handle it without the need for spare reasoning capacity to fill gaps.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Frontier models are expensive and companies can burn through a year’s budget worth of tokens in months. But most tasks can be handled by much smaller, more constrained models at a fraction of the cost.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You don’t always have to pay the frontier guys for every task,” he said. “We’ve observed with some clients that we could save them 95% with a 3 billion parameter model.”</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Harness</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An AI agent harness is the software infrastructure scaffolding around an LLM that differentiates an agent from a chatbot. It’s what enables an agent to act on tasks rather than simply respond to prompts. A model reasons through a problem and decides what to do about it. The harness connects the model to the tools, systems, memory, guardrails, and execution environments required to perform the actions determined by the model. The term is frequently used more or less interchangeably with orchestration layer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It’s the process around the model, which matters way more than the model itself,” Thakrar said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In benchmark tests, a superior harness on a less powerful model produces better results than an inferior harness on a much bigger model.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For the best results, Thakrar said, it’s essential to understand the deterministic and non-deterministic elements of a given workload, and build that into the architecture. Machines can read, organize, and validate, and they excel at deterministic tasks. Humans, on the other hand, are exceptional at non-deterministic tasks like judging, synthesizing, and deciding.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those non-deterministic tasks in a process are the ideal point for AI agents to incorporate a human in the loop, what Thakrar calls human harness. He pointed to a stakeholder mapping agent Zoho built for sales as an example, which takes the context of an initial meeting and third-party enriched data like a LinkedIn profile, weighs probabilities, and makes an educated guess about the stakeholder map.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The initial goal was just to eliminate that task completely from the human workflow,” he said. “The stakeholder map is done, it’s in the folder, and you can look at it.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But the agent would struggle to capture nuance. The meanings of titles in organizations always vary, and the politics and dynamics of any given meeting can be difficult for an AI agent to discern. Rather than keep feeding the agent data to try to make it intelligent enough to make those determinations, it was simpler and more efficient for the agent to create a proposed stakeholder map and hand it over to a human who could make changes and explain why those changes were necessary.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Ultimately, Thakrar said the agent still saved human team members time because the stakeholder map was usually pretty close, and the corrections also helped the model grow smarter by adding richer context.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Specialization</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Specialization is transitioning a process from testing on a frontier model to production on a much narrower, smaller model. Once you’ve proven that an agent can do a job well, you want to stop paying master-craftsman rates to keep doing that one job well.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Specialization is all about capturing your subject matter experts’ best judgement and pattern recognition to build an open-weight, open source, trained, and fine-tuned model that can be deployed in your own data center.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The true enterprise bet is to keep that orchestration layer, which is your IP and knowledge, in house,” Thakrar said. “You don’t want to host that on someone else’s model. The goal of everyone in enterprise should be to run, train, and host their own models.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Stop asking AI nicely: Here’s how to get work-ready results every time]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Over the past few years, I have learned that basic prompts produce inconsistent, hallucination-prone results that no executive would trust in production. What turned the tide was my move to advanced prompting techniques. These weren’t theoretical experiments; they became a practical foundation fo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694396/it-security-nachrichten/stop-asking-ai-nicely-heres-how-to-get-work-ready-results-every-time/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694396/it-security-nachrichten/stop-asking-ai-nicely-heres-how-to-get-work-ready-results-every-time/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over the past few years, I have learned that basic prompts produce inconsistent, hallucination-prone results that no executive would trust in production. What turned the tide was my move to advanced prompting techniques. These weren’t theoretical experiments; they became a practical foundation for reliable, measurable outcomes. I want to share the techniques that consistently delivered the biggest gains in my projects, complete with real before-and-after examples, copy-paste templates, lessons from failures and guidance on when to evolve beyond prompting to agentic systems.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why advanced prompting still matters in enterprise settings</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sophisticated prompting remains essential for control, reliability and compliance. If you “ask nicely” and hope for the best, you need deterministic behavior, auditable reasoning and minimal risk of hallucination. Here’s what worked for me.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">1. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and its variants: Unlocking step-by-step reasoning</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>The problem:</strong> Models would jump to conclusions on complex analysis tasks, especially involving data interpretation or multi-step logic.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>What I did:</strong> I started explicitly instructing the model to “think step by step” and show its reasoning.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Before (basic prompt): </strong>“Analyze last quarter’s sales data and recommend three actions.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>After (CoT prompt):</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“You’re a senior business analyst. Analyze the following sales data step by step: [data]. First, identify the key trends. Second, calculate the rates and anomalies. Third, link findings to business context. Finally, recommend the three prioritized actions with expected impact. Explain your reasoning at each step.”  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Results:</strong> Accuracy and depth improved dramatically.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Variants that worked well:</strong> Self-consistency. I ran the same CoT prompt multiple times and took the majority consensus. This reduced variability significantly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Template you can use:</strong></p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>You are [expert role]. Solve this problem by thinking step by step.

[Task or question]

For each step:

1. State your observation or calculation.

2. Explain the implication.

3. Proceed only when confident.

Final answer in this format: [structured output]</code></pre>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">2. Tree-of-Thoughts (ToT): Exploring multiple reasoning paths</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For truly complex decisions such as resource allocation or risk assessment, linear CoT isn’t enough. Tree-of-Thoughts lets the model generate and evaluate multiple branches.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Example:</strong> I was helping a client evaluate three potential vendor platforms for an AI deployment. A standard prompt gave a superficial comparison. With ToT</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Prompt Snippet:</strong></p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>Explore three different reasoning paths for selecting the best vendor platform:

Path 1: Focus on cost and scalability.

Path 2: Focus on security, compliance and integration.

Path 3: Focus on innovation and long-term roadmap.

For each path, evaluate pros/cons against our requirements [list].

Then, compare the paths and recommend the strongest overall option with justification.</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Outcome:</strong> The model surfaced nuanced trade-offs (e.g., one vendor had superior security, but higher integration cost).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>When to use:</strong> Strategic planning, troubleshooting or scenarios with high uncertainty and multiple viable approaches.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">3. ReAct (Reason+ Act) and prompt chaining: Moving toward agentic behavior</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the biggest leaps I have noticed comes from combining reasoning with tool use and chaining prompts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>ReAct example</strong>: (used in data analytics workflow)</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>You are an AI analyst with access to tools. For the query below:

1. Reason about what information you need.

2. Choose the appropriate tool or action.

3. Observe the result.

4. Repeat until you can answer confidently.

Query: [user request]</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In practice, I chained this with retrieval tools. One automated quarterly compliance reporting; the system reasoned about required data, pulled relevant records, validated them, and generated the reports.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">4. Meta-prompting and self-reflection: Letting the model improve itself</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Use the model to refine its own prompt. This is a huge time-saver.</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>You are an expert prompt engineer. Improve the following prompt for clarity, structure and effectiveness with [target model]. Make it more precise while preserving intent.

Original prompt: [paste]

Provide the improved version and explain your changes.</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Self-reflection loops (asking the model to critique its own output and revise) are a game-changer for content generation and code-review tasks.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">5. Multimodal and structured output techniques</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With vision-enabled models, I started combining text with images (e.g., uploading architecture diagrams or dashboards).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Tip from experience:</strong> Be extremely specific in describing what the models should focus on.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Best practices I learned the hard way</h4>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Start simple, then layer complexity</strong>: Over-engineered prompts from Day One usually backfire.</li>



<li><strong>Model specific tuning:</strong> Some models respond better to XML delimiters; others to explicit reasoning.</li>



<li><strong>Evaluation and versioning:</strong> Treat prompts like code if you track versions and run automated evals.</li>



<li><strong>Security guardrails:</strong> Always include instructions against prompt injections and respect data boundaries.</li>



<li><strong>When to stop prompting</strong>: For repetitive, high-stakes workflows, move to full agents or an orchestration framework.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Final takeaways for technical leaders</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Advanced prompt engineering has now become a core competency for anyone responsible for enterprise AI outcomes. Start by picking one technique and apply it rigorously to a real business problem. Document before/ after and you will notice why it’s worth mastering.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The field continues evolving towards more automated and agentic systems, but the ability to precisely direct AI reasoning remains foundational.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI Presence raises new questions about enterprise automation and jobs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[OpenAI has launched Presence, an enterprise service for deploying voice and chat agents that can resolve customer and employee requests, potentially automating some work now handled by frontline support teams.



The agents can answer questions and operate IT systems, and enterprises can decide w...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694393/it-security-nachrichten/openai-presence-raises-new-questions-about-enterprise-automation-and-jobs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694393/it-security-nachrichten/openai-presence-raises-new-questions-about-enterprise-automation-and-jobs/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI has launched Presence, an enterprise service for deploying voice and chat agents that can resolve customer and employee requests, potentially automating some work now handled by frontline support teams.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The agents can answer questions and operate IT systems, and enterprises can decide what actions the agents may take and when they should seek human approval for actions or transfer a case to a human.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI is already using Presence internally for its English-language phone support channel, where it verifies callers and uses account information to complete approved actions. The company said the system resolves 75% of inbound issues without human assistance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another OpenAI service, Codex, can be used to monitor agents and suggest updates or improvements to processes. In OpenAI’s own tests, suggestions from Codex helped reduce handoffs to humans by 15 percentage points over 10 days, it said. Presence also includes simulation and evaluation tools that allow companies to test an agent before deployment. The tests assess whether it reaches the correct outcome, follows company policy, and hands a case to an employee when required.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI intends each Presence deployment to deal with one kind of task, for example billing issues, insurance claims, or employee IT service requests, with agents getting only the knowledge and system access required for that task.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Presence is not a self-service product: Enterprises will have to sign up for the limited availability program, with integration performed by OpenAI or selected <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4136024/openai-partners-with-consulting-giants-to-deploy-enterprise-ai-agents.html">global systems integrators</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Companies exploring or testing Presence include Spanish bank BBVA, which is evaluating the service for everyday banking support in Mexico, and Japanese technology group SoftBank, which is using it in trials involving Japanese-language customer interactions. Australian insurer IAG is assessing whether the technology can help it respond to surges in customer demand during severe weather events.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Workforce impact</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI’s announcement did not address the potential effect of Presence on employment. But its claimed automation rate raises questions about how the technology could affect staffing in customer service and other support functions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://pareekh.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Pareekh Jain</a>, CEO of Pareekh Consulting, said CIOs should regard the 75% figure as evidence that the technology can work, rather than as a benchmark that every enterprise can expect to reach.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jain said OpenAI’s deployment benefits from being built around the company’s own products and data. Large enterprises may achieve lower automation rates because they must contend with fragmented legacy systems, uneven knowledge bases and more complex compliance demands.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Most organizations should expect lower initial automation levels that improve over time as the AI agent is refined,” Jain said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first workforce effect is more likely to be <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4015750/cios-see-ai-prompting-new-it-hiring-even-as-boards-push-for-job-cuts.html">slower hiring than immediate layoffs</a>, according to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/tulikasheel/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tulika Sheel</a>, senior vice president at Kadence International.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The roles most exposed are likely to be repetitive, high-volume functions such as frontline customer support and routine back-office processing,” Sheel said. “However, I would expect the first impact to be on hiring and team growth rather than immediate large-scale job cuts. Over time, enterprises may redesign roles around AI-assisted workflows, with humans focusing more on complex cases, escalation, and relationship management.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jain said Tier-1 support agents handling predictable queries would face the most exposure. Broader reductions would become more likely only after companies reorganize their operations around the technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, <a href="https://omdia.tech.informa.com/authors/lian-jye-su" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lian Jye Su</a>, chief analyst at Omdia, said Presence is unlikely to increase the threat of job displacement because companies have used similar customer-support automation from vendors such as Genesys, NiCE, Five9 and AWS for years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises are more likely to use Presence alongside employees, with AI handling routine requests while people remain responsible for work requiring judgment and empathy, Su said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Cost and operational risks</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Analysts said CIOs should examine whether Presence can maintain resolution quality as usage grows, since fewer human handoffs could leave employees dealing with a more difficult mix of cases.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The key question is not simply how many tasks AI can handle, but whether it can handle them reliably at scale,” Sheel said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The financial case will depend partly on the cost of connecting Presence to existing systems and maintaining the controls needed to govern its use, according to Jain. “Often the biggest cost of enterprise AI is not tokens but <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4128310/openai-responds-to-claude-cowork-with-its-own-platform-to-help-build-deploy-and-manage-ai-agents.html">integration and governance</a>,” Jain added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Companies will need to determine what systems and data the agents can access, monitor their performance, and audit the actions they take. Those investments could offset early savings.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Su said the complexity of enterprise IT will make it difficult for OpenAI to automate entire workflows on its own. Enterprises will still need to work with other technology providers and human employees, while CIOs will favor systems that can be audited and integrated with existing infrastructure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jain said the economics could improve if companies use the same integrations and governance controls across additional workflows.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How to navigate the AI talent wars]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Cloudflare recently beat Q1 2026 earnings. Revenue up 34% year over year. EPS ahead of consensus. Full-year guidance raised. Then, in the same breath, they announced 1,100 layoffs, 20% of the company. CEO Matthew Prince’s explanation: “The way we work at Cloudflare has fundamentally changed.”



...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694394/it-security-nachrichten/how-to-navigate-the-ai-talent-wars/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694394/it-security-nachrichten/how-to-navigate-the-ai-talent-wars/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/cloudflare-net-q1-earnings-revenues-230528107.html">Cloudflare recently beat Q1 2026 earnings</a>. Revenue up 34% year over year. EPS ahead of consensus. Full-year guidance raised. Then, in the same breath, they announced 1,100 layoffs, 20% of the company. CEO Matthew Prince’s explanation: “The way we work at Cloudflare has fundamentally changed.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/block-q1-earnings-beat-strong-144200216.html">Block did the same thing</a>. Beat guidance, raised outlook, cut 4,000+ jobs. Both framed it as architecting for the AI era.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is not a contradiction. This is the new math boards are running. And if you’re a CIO who hasn’t started running it yourself, <a href="mailto:https://www.cio.com/article/4077996/cios-be-ready-for-agentic-ai-or-be-out-of-a-job.html">you’re behind</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The benchmark has moved</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-native companies have quietly reset what “efficient” means for a technology organization. Midjourney generates over $500M in revenue with roughly 160 employees, over $3M per head. Anthropic hit a $14B annualized run rate in early 2026 with fewer than 3,000 employees. Across the top AI-native startups, <a href="mailto:https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulbaier/2026/03/31/ai-native-firms-lead-in-revenue-per-employee/">the average revenue per employee is $3.48M</a>, nearly twelve times the traditional SaaS benchmark of $300K.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="mailto:https://www.saastr.com/what-to-do-if-your-business-decelerates/">Boards aren’t comparing you to your 2019 self anymore</a>. They’re comparing you to Anthropic.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the pressure Cloudflare and Block are responding to. They’re not cutting people because the business is struggling. They’re cutting because investors have internalized a new denominator. Headcount is no longer a proxy for capacity; it’s a liability on the efficiency ratio.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For CIOs, this creates a hiring problem that looks nothing like the cloud or mobile talent gaps of the past decade. Those gaps were about volume: hire 100 cloud engineers, absorb the cost, build the capability… This one is about density; you’re not looking for 100 people. You’re looking for 10 who can deliver what 100 couldn’t, and justify $1M or more in value per seat.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Finding bodies to fill seats has never been easier. Finding people who operate at that level of leverage is a different problem entirely.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">‘Acqui-hires’ are a shortcut with a hidden cost</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Companies have figured out that recruiting AI-native talent one by one is too slow and that it’s faster to buy a team. Google’s acquisition of the Windsurf founders, Meta bringing in the Scale AI team, Accenture’s string of AI-focused acquisitions: <a href="mailto:https://tomtunguz.com/ai-acqui-hire-wave/">these are acqui-hires</a> dressed up as M&amp;A. The premium on experienced AI talent is high enough, and the urgency real enough, that organizations are skipping traditional hiring loops entirely and buying their way in.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve been on the other side of this. My company, MadKudu, was acquired by HG Insights specifically to bring AI-native capability into an established enterprise business. HG needed change agents who had already figured out how to build and ship in this new era, not just people who’d read about it. That’s the thesis behind most of these deals.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But there’s a cost that doesn’t show up in the acquisition price.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-native teams are fast because they operate with a different set of defaults: full access to tools, minimal governance layers, the ability to experiment and ship without a six-week approval cycle. That operating model is not a perk; it’s the fundamental mechanism. It’s why a team of 10 can do what an enterprise team of 100 can’t.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When you acqui-hire that team and then slot them into your existing approval processes, you’ve bought the people and killed the engine. The change agents you paid for become change-frustrated. The attrition that follows is expensive and predictable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The harder realization: acquiring an AI-native team means accepting how they work. That requires deliberately carving out space for them to operate differently, not just tolerating it but institutionalizing it. The acquisition is an organizational change program, not just a hiring event.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The CIO’s real problem</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The governance stack most enterprise organizations run was designed for a headcount world. Every tool vetting cycle, every vendor review, every security approval was calibrated assuming you were managing a large team where consistency and control were the primary objectives.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That calculus breaks when your goal is talent density. The same approval processes that protect against data leaks are now the reason your best people can’t do their best work. When it takes six weeks to approve a tool that your competitor’s team is already shipping with, you’ve traded velocity for the perception of safety.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The practical fix is structured experimentation: clear guardrails, defined boundaries, but explicit permission to try tools before deciding whether to roll them out broadly. Gating everything prevents you from ever discovering what 10x productivity looks like.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The skills inventory question is also more nuanced than it sounds. Job titles won’t tell you where the leverage is. You need to map the actual tasks within each function and assess which can be automated or augmented with AI. That’s where you find the people who, with the right tools, become your $1M/employee talent, not because you hired differently, but because you enabled better.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is also where the build-versus-buy question gets genuinely tricky. As AI reshapes how products are built and delivered, your internal operating model — how you work, how fast you ship, how you use data — is becoming core IP. Outsourcing delivery means outsourcing the part of the organization where your competitive advantage is now being built.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Closing the gap without slowing down</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="mailto:https://www.saastr.com/the-great-ai-talent-grab-the-latest-20vc-with-jason-harry-and-rory/">The AI talent wars</a> are not primarily a recruiting problem. They’re a rethinking of what organizations are supposed to look like.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Boards have a new benchmark. Cloudflare, Block, Amazon, Meta and others have already started restructuring to meet it, publicly, painfully, even while beating their numbers. The question for CIOs isn’t whether this pressure arrives; it’s whether you’re ahead of it or behind it when it does.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The organizations that navigate this well won’t win by outbidding competitors for a handful of elite engineers. They’ll win by designing operating systems that amplify the leverage of the talent they do have, by enabling their best people rather than constraining them, and by treating AI fluency as a core organizational capability rather than a niche specialization.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Talent density is the new headcount model. The sooner your governance, your tooling and your board conversations reflect that, the better positioned you’ll be when the next efficiency report lands.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sponsor mismatch is the silent killer of enterprise transformation]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Late in a large enterprise SAP transformation, the strategic governance conversations began to drift. Instead of executive decisions, we found ourselves debating whether the program needed dedicated testing, whether cutover required a full weekend, whether twenty Agile teams really needed coordin...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694391/it-security-nachrichten/sponsor-mismatch-is-the-silent-killer-of-enterprise-transformation/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694391/it-security-nachrichten/sponsor-mismatch-is-the-silent-killer-of-enterprise-transformation/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Late in a large enterprise SAP transformation, the strategic governance conversations began to drift. Instead of executive decisions, we found ourselves debating whether the program needed dedicated testing, whether cutover required a full weekend, whether twenty Agile teams really needed coordination support and whether offshore resources were adding value at all.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The questions were not coming from the delivery teams. They were coming from the executive sponsor.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The sponsor had recently been elevated into a senior leadership role and had never sponsored a technology transformation at this scale. The challenge was not authority. The sponsor had every right to ask any question they wanted. The challenge was that strategic governance had quietly turned into a debate about delivery practices, because the sponsor did not yet have the transformation context to focus the conversation anywhere else.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is not a story about a bad sponsor. The executive in this case was a capable senior leader with strong judgment and authentic intent. They had been placed into a role they had not yet been prepared for, and the pattern that followed was structural, not personal. It is one of the more common patterns I have observed across enterprise transformation programs, and one of the most consistently misdiagnosed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most program failures are not execution failures. They are sponsor mismatches.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">When governance becomes a debate about delivery practices</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When the sponsor does not understand what an enterprise transformation actually requires, governance forums stop functioning as decision bodies and start functioning as practice debates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You see it in the questions that get asked. Why do we need a dedicated testing phase? Can the Build timeline be compressed? Why does cutover need a full weekend? Why do we need more Scrum Masters across 20 product teams? Can the US team simply work longer hours instead of using offshore resources? On one program, the sponsor suggested shifting the entire project’s working hours to India time, despite roughly 85 percent of the delivery organization being based in the United States.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of these questions are unreasonable in isolation. Each one targets a real cost or timeline pressure. The problem is what is missing underneath them: an understanding of the operational risks the original choices were designed to mitigate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When sponsors ask delivery-practice questions without that context, the program leadership team ends up defending the work instead of advancing it. Decision velocity drops. Trust between the program and its sponsor erodes. Senior delivery talent disengages from governance forums where the conversation never reaches the decisions they need made. What looks from the outside like an active sponsor producing engagement is, from inside the program, an active drain on the cycles needed to deliver.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The compounding cost is not unique to any single program. <a href="https://www.pmi.org/blog/why-executive-sponsorship-fuels-projects">PMI’s research on executive sponsorship</a> consistently identifies sponsor engagement quality, rather than sponsor presence alone, as one of the strongest predictors of project success. The visible symptom is debate. The actual cost is unmade decisions.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Authority is rarely the issue. Literacy is</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When transformations stall under a mismatched sponsor, the diagnostic instinct is to question the sponsor’s authority. Are they senior enough? Do they have the cross-functional reach? Can they unblock?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In most of the programs I have led or advised, authority was not the limiting factor. The sponsor in the SAP program above had ample authority. They could unblock any decision the program needed. What had not been developed was the transformation literacy to know which decisions mattered, which were technical noise and which were execution risks that should not be optimized away.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is what I have come to think of as the literacy problem. Sponsors elevated into transformation roles often have deep functional expertise (finance, operations, business unit leadership) but limited exposure to the distinct functions of PMO, organizational change management, agile delivery, testing and cutover, and how each one reduces a specific category of implementation risk. They are not expected to be SAP configuration experts. But they need enough transformation literacy to recognize which questions actually belong in a steering committee.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://hbr.org/2015/05/how-to-be-an-effective-executive-sponsor">Harvard Business Review’s research on effective executive sponsorship</a> has emphasized that sponsorship effectiveness depends as much on judgment as on authority. Judgment is where literacy becomes operational. A sponsor with authority but limited transformation literacy will optimize for speed and cost in ways that consistently underestimate risk. A sponsor with both will make the tradeoffs the program actually needs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.prosci.com/resources/articles/change-management-best-practices">Prosci’s longstanding benchmark studies on change management</a> have ranked active and visible executive sponsorship as the single greatest contributor to change success for two decades. The word that matters in that finding is active. Active sponsorship without transformation literacy can introduce real cost. Not because the sponsor is acting against the program, but because the optimization choices they make are based on incomplete information about what the program is built to protect against.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Shift the conversation from delivery practices to business risk</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When the sponsor relationship is already in place and cannot be changed, the program leadership team has one move that consistently works: shift the conversation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the SAP program above, we stopped explaining why the testing phase existed. We started explaining the business risk of reducing it. We stopped debating the number of Scrum Masters. We started connecting delivery capacity to coordination across more than twenty Agile teams and the business cost of losing that coordination. We reframed offshore support as a way to maintain delivery momentum around the clock rather than asking the U.S. team to sustain fifteen-hour days.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The shift is from defending delivery practice to explaining business risk. The sponsor does not need to understand why testing takes the time it does. They need to understand what the program is exposed to if testing is compressed. They do not need to know how many Scrum Masters are statistically optimal for twenty Agile teams. They need to know what coordination breaks when the number is wrong.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This reframing accomplishes two things. First, it brings the conversation back to the level at which sponsors actually make decisions: tradeoffs between business outcomes and business risks. Second, it builds transformation literacy in the sponsor over time, almost as a byproduct. By the third or fourth iteration of business-risk-framed conversations, the sponsor begins to ask the right questions on their own.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In practice, this happens through small but deliberate moves. When the sponsor asks why a phase needs the time it takes, the program lead names two or three things that could go wrong if the time is cut and what each would cost the business. When the sponsor asks why a role is needed, the program lead names the work that would not get done without it. Every delivery-practice question gets converted into a business-risk answer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The program leadership team’s job is not to make the sponsor an expert in SAP delivery. It is to provide enough transformation context so that executive decisions reflect both business priorities and implementation realities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are a few phrases I have used with executive sponsors over the years that capture the underlying issue. The sharpest one:</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">If the decision has to go above the sponsor, they are not the sponsor.</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sponsorship is defined by what the sponsor can decide without asking someone else. That is the test. Anything else is the appearance of sponsorship, not the substance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For CIOs supporting enterprise transformation, the implication is direct. Sponsor selection, or sponsor preparation when selection is not an option, is not a hierarchy question. It is a transformation capability question. The same execution discipline that goes into defining decision rights, structuring governance and protecting delivery momentum should apply, with equal rigor, to assessing sponsor fit and building sponsor literacy before the program begins.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A sponsor does not need to be the technical expert. They do need to know when to trust the people who are.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Getting a grip on shadow tokens and AI blowouts]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Four months of Claude Code — that’s all it took for Uber to burn through its entire annual budget for AI. Token after token, engineers embraced the platform with few control mechanisms tying costs to outcomes. The result was a budget runaway and a clear case study in how limited oversight snowbal...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694389/it-security-nachrichten/getting-a-grip-on-shadow-tokens-and-ai-blowouts/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694389/it-security-nachrichten/getting-a-grip-on-shadow-tokens-and-ai-blowouts/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:48 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Four months of Claude Code — that’s all it took for Uber to burn through its entire annual budget for AI. Token after token, engineers embraced the platform with few control mechanisms tying costs to outcomes. The result was a budget runaway and <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/janakirammsv/2026/05/17/uber-burns-its-2026-ai-budget-in-four-months-on-claude-code/">a clear case study</a> in how limited oversight snowballs into an AI blowout.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is a phenomenon I like to call “shadow tokens” — AI credits paid for by the company but largely invisible to decision-makers. Too many engineers have the final say over how much they consume and, therefore, what it costs. This all-you-can-eat attitude is part of the reason why <a href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/930447/microsoft-claude-code-discontinued-notepad">Microsoft is reportedly</a> winding down many internal licenses across key engineering teams and why <a href="https://www.thestreet.com/investing/the-next-phase-of-ai-spending-is-already-underway">one in five organizations</a> is missing its AI spend forecast by more than 50%.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And the trend is only accelerating. By 2028, <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4189149/ai-coding-token-costs-are-on-track-to-rival-human-payroll.html">Gartner predicts</a> that AI coding costs (driven by this kind of ungoverned consumption) will be as much per developer as the salary companies pay that person.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">LLMs and agents introduce a new class of variable cost that scales with behavior rather than headcount, putting enterprises on the hook for tools that balloon with workload. I don’t see this as enterprises overspending because they’re reckless — it’s down to a lack of managerial oversight, budget alignment that demands a proven return on investment, and engineer education on how much is too much.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Going forward, CIOs need to thread the AI needle between governance that encourages transparency and reasonable spend without stifling innovation.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">When shadow tokens result in real costs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The issue is that AI isn’t a traditional line item. Previously, enterprise leaders onboarded software-as-a-service (SaaS) with a good idea of the total cost. An allocated software seat or annual contract was a known quantity. The cloud added some variation (with fluctuations depending on hosting size), but instances were still modelable. AI flips this status quo on its head — the unit of consumption is behavior and the cost is exponential.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And these specifics aren’t immediately apparent at pilot. Tools can appear inexpensive in controlled experiments yet unpredictably scale depending on session length, context window size, model selection and whether agents run in parallel. This is the fallacy of the $20-per-seat enterprise plan — tokens are charged separately at API rates with no ceiling. The final dollar value of any session is set by factors that finance can’t always model in advance, particularly when these decisions usually rest with the engineers themselves.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to <a href="https://www.deloitte.com/cz-sk/en/services/consulting/research/the-state-of-ai-in-the-enterprise.html">Deloitte</a>, only 21% of organizations deploying agents have a mature governance model, a real concern because they’re token-eating machines. This is what was happening at Uber — Claude Code in agentic mode was autonomously reading codebases, planning changes across dozens of files and opening pull requests. Each step quickly adds up, with Anthropic’s own documentation noting that agents consume approximately seven times as many tokens as standard sessions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is shadow IT and shadow AI, evolved. This time, however, many leaders approved the tool in question without guardrails governing consumption. AI hype adds fuel to the fire and normalizes long sessions. Uber’s CTO, for example, <a href="https://x.com/praveenTweets/status/2033627282418655711">described</a> a company-wide shift toward “agentic software engineering” with employees “who are quietly experimenting, quietly shipping and quietly pushing things forward”. This is an exciting way to test the limits of what’s possible, certainly, but it’s also a position that goes a long way to explaining how the company spent its annual AI budget by April.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Shifting the culture from usage to yield</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Engineers haven’t done anything wrong here. In fact, they’re adopting and experimenting as instructed, with Uber creating leaderboards and ranking users by token consumption. More use led to a better ranking, reflecting a culture that lauds new ways of doing things. This behavior is known as “<a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178320/tokenmaxxing-when-ai-adoption-metrics-go-bad.html">tokenmaxxing</a>,” and its principal knock-on effect is shadow tokens — quantity-over-quality processes that leaders struggle to control until they’re fully realized in the budget. Of course, if management treats adoption metrics as performance metrics, then engineers can’t be blamed for using more tokens. The tension is that the teams driving adoption aren’t the ones managing spend.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this is meant to dismiss AI’s productivity possibilities and potential return on investment. Developers save <a href="https://getdx.com/blog/ai-assisted-engineering-q4-impact-report-2025/">3.6 hours</a> per week, achieve 60% higher pull request throughput and cut onboarding time in half with automation. Meanwhile, Uber shared that roughly 11% of live backend updates were written by agents with no human in the loop. However, these wins aren’t the problem — it’s that too many teams aren’t connecting input to output. I’ve spoken to admins who discovered their token spend had tripled in a single quarter after using heavier models or accidentally doubling up on agentic applications. Nobody knew until the financial damage was done.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Automation needs to happen sustainably with an eye on the bottom line. In my view, a much better metric for achieving this is AI yield — the measurable business or engineering output generated per dollar spent on tokens. Otherwise, without a feedback loop, even genuinely productive teams are flying blind.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Stopping token waste before an AI blowout</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Creating that throughline between AI investment and token consumption starts with established financial metrics. This is possible via maximum spend limits (dictated by spend tagging, workload tiering and cost-per-output benchmarks) per team or project. Then, any additional allocation requires approval, closing the loop between the engineers spending the tokens and the leaders paying for them. AI isn’t cheap and teams should demonstrate a bang for their buck.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is something we do with our engineering team at Hexnode. Resource allocation for Claude Code and Cursor is tied directly to ROI rather than letting consumption run open-ended. Given the pay-as-you-go nature of these tools, a firm usage limit per team offers simple but essential control.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Similarly, there’s room to apply some of the governance principles IT uses for device management. Things like policy enforcement, role-based access, real-time monitoring and automated alerts can flag usage behavior in advance. Uncovering such insights at the token layer works to identify power users and prevent excessive spending.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We also need to encourage cultures that praise outputs that actually achieve efficiency. AI applications that result in shipping faster, reducing rework and cutting review cycles are gains that should be celebrated. If your company hosts leaderboards, frame unnecessary token burn as wasteful rather than valuable. The organizations creating healthier consumption habits work with their engineers to understand not just how to use AI, but what responsible use looks like and what it costs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is a conversation teams need to have now. Anthropic <a href="https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15036540-use-the-claude-agent-sdk-with-your-claude-plan">just ended flat-rate pricing</a> for programmatic workloads from June 15. Now, agents, continuous integration pipelines and automated workflows draw from a dedicated monthly credit pool billed separately from the subscription. Once that pool is exhausted, agent tasks either stop entirely or overflow to extra billing. Work can either get very expensive or grind to a halt for teams that aren’t prepared.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Getting a grip on shadow tokens means better rules and tools connecting spend to outcomes. Only by building the financial and cultural infrastructure that encourages sustainable adoption can leaders see what they’re spending, connect it to what they’re getting and course-correct before the costs become a crisis. Ultimately, shadow tokens are only invisible if we choose not to look.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Social-Media-Werbung wird zur Scam-Maschine]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Betrüger nutzen immer häufiger Werbung bei Facebook, Instagram & Co. Eine neue Studie zeigt, wie gravierend das Problem inzwischen ist.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694344/it-security-nachrichten/social-media-werbung-wird-zur-scam-maschine/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694344/it-security-nachrichten/social-media-werbung-wird-zur-scam-maschine/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:55:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Betrüger nutzen immer häufiger Werbung bei Facebook, Instagram &amp; Co. Eine neue Studie zeigt, wie gravierend das Problem inzwischen ist.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Trump Threatens New Tariffs Against EU Over Google Fine]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[President Trump threatened a "substantial" new tariff on the European Union after Brussels fined Google more than $1 billion over alleged illegal trade practices. "The European Union will pay a very big price for this illegal and highly unethical conduct, which I have consistently warned them abo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694247/it-security-nachrichten/trump-threatens-new-tariffs-against-eu-over-google-fine/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694247/it-security-nachrichten/trump-threatens-new-tariffs-against-eu-over-google-fine/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:52:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[President Trump threatened a "substantial" new tariff on the European Union after Brussels fined Google more than $1 billion over alleged illegal trade practices. "The European Union will pay a very big price for this illegal and highly unethical conduct, which I have consistently warned them about," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "The penalties will be entirely reversed and, we anticipate, a substantial TARIFF to be placed on them at the earliest possible moment." Politico reports: The president's threat came just a day after U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer warned that the EU's action against Google -- two fines totaling over $1 billion -- could imperil the bloc's relationship with the White House. At risk: the Turnberry deal, which Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen signed last fall, that capped U.S. tariffs on EU exports at 15 percent. [...] But the president's social media post could signal a coming breach. "The United States of America is not a 'PIGGYBANK' for Europe, nor will we allow it to be!" Trump wrote.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Trump+Threatens+New+Tariffs+Against+EU+Over+Google+Fine%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fyro.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F24%2F2111219%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fyro.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F24%2F2111219%2Ftrump-threatens-new-tariffs-against-eu-over-google-fine%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://yro.slashdot.org/story/26/07/24/2111219/trump-threatens-new-tariffs-against-eu-over-google-fine?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft löst Azure-Problem: Updates und Store laufen wieder]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Nach einem weitreichenden Ausfall der Azure-Infrastruktur funktionieren zentrale Windows-Dienste wieder. Nutzer und Administratoren können Updates und Store-Inhalte nun wieder wie gewohnt herunterladen. Die Störung dauerte mehrere Stunden an.			(Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694181/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-loest-azure-problem-updates-und-store-laufen-wieder/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694181/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-loest-azure-problem-updates-und-store-laufen-wieder/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:51:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/news,160201.html"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="Windows 11, Windows Update, Microsoft Windows 11, Windows 11 Update, Windows 11 Updates, Windows 11 Logo" width="1920" height="1080" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/1920/56589.jpg"></a>
			Nach einem weitreichenden Ausfall der Azure-Infrastruktur funktionieren zentrale Windows-Dienste wieder. Nutzer und Administratoren können Updates und Store-Inhalte nun wieder wie gewohnt herunterladen. Die Störung dauerte mehrere Stunden an.			(<a href="https://winfuture.de/news,160201.html">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[These 3 Fire TV Sticks are on sale at Best Buy - here's the one I recommend (and why)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Fire TV Sticks are back down to all-time low prices for Best Buy's Black Friday in July sale. We'll break down just how good of a deal you can get.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694175/it-security-nachrichten/these-3-fire-tv-sticks-are-on-sale-at-best-buy-heres-the-one-i-recommend-and-why/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694175/it-security-nachrichten/these-3-fire-tv-sticks-are-on-sale-at-best-buy-heres-the-one-i-recommend-and-why/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 18:51:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Fire TV Sticks are back down to all-time low prices for Best Buy's Black Friday in July sale. We'll break down just how good of a deal you can get.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Replace Your Old Vac and Mop With One Device and Save $110 When You Do It]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Get Dreame’s H12 Pro wet/dry vacuum at a new record-low price and undercut Amazon’s current deal by an extra $67.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694114/it-nachrichten/replace-your-old-vac-and-mop-with-one-device-and-save-110-when-you-do-it/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694114/it-nachrichten/replace-your-old-vac-and-mop-with-one-device-and-save-110-when-you-do-it/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 17:47:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Get Dreame’s H12 Pro wet/dry vacuum at a new record-low price and undercut Amazon’s current deal by an extra $67.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft löst Azure-Problem: Updates und Store laufen wieder - WinFuture.de]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In Unternehmensnetzwerken meldeten Administratoren zudem Probleme bei den Windows Server Update Services (WSUS). Downloads waren teils verzögert ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694111/windows-server/microsoft-loest-azure-problem-updates-und-store-laufen-wieder-winfuturede/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694111/windows-server/microsoft-loest-azure-problem-updates-und-store-laufen-wieder-winfuturede/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 17:46:10 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Server</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In Unternehmensnetzwerken meldeten Administratoren zudem Probleme bei den <b>Windows Server</b> Update Services (WSUS). Downloads waren teils verzögert ...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What Singapore’s $913M Scam Problem Says About FCC SIM ID Plans]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Singapore has required SIM identity checks since 2005. As the FCC proposes similar US rules, Singapore's scam data shows verification alone isn't enough.
The post What Singapore’s $913M Scam Problem Says About FCC SIM ID Plans appeared first on TechRepublic.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694059/it-nachrichten/what-singapores-913m-scam-problem-says-about-fcc-sim-id-plans/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694059/it-nachrichten/what-singapores-913m-scam-problem-says-about-fcc-sim-id-plans/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 16:47:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Singapore has required SIM identity checks since 2005. As the FCC proposes similar US rules, Singapore's scam data shows verification alone isn't enough.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.techrepublic.com/article/news-singapore-scam-fcc-sim-id-plans-apac/">What Singapore’s $913M Scam Problem Says About FCC SIM ID Plans</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.techrepublic.com/">TechRepublic</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nvidia Signs $1.5B Deal to Expand US AI Chip Packaging]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Nvidia’s $1.5 billion Amkor deal will expand US AI chip packaging capacity and could help ease a growing semiconductor supply bottleneck.
The post Nvidia Signs $1.5B Deal to Expand US AI Chip Packaging appeared first on TechRepublic.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694058/it-nachrichten/nvidia-signs-15b-deal-to-expand-us-ai-chip-packaging/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694058/it-nachrichten/nvidia-signs-15b-deal-to-expand-us-ai-chip-packaging/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 16:47:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nvidia’s $1.5 billion Amkor deal will expand US AI chip packaging capacity and could help ease a growing semiconductor supply bottleneck.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.techrepublic.com/article/news-nvidia-amkor-us-ai-chip-packaging-deal/">Nvidia Signs $1.5B Deal to Expand US AI Chip Packaging</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.techrepublic.com/">TechRepublic</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Save Hundreds When You Preorder  Samsung’s Brand-New Galaxy Foldablen Phones]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Samsung just announced the Galaxy Flip 8, Fold 8 and the Fold Ultra. Here’s how you can score a nice preorder deal.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3694020/it-nachrichten/save-hundreds-when-you-preorder-samsungs-brand-new-galaxy-foldablen-phones/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3694020/it-nachrichten/save-hundreds-when-you-preorder-samsungs-brand-new-galaxy-foldablen-phones/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 16:17:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Samsung just announced the Galaxy Flip 8, Fold 8 and the Fold Ultra. Here’s how you can score a nice preorder deal.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[One fallen power line exposed a growing AI data center problem. Here’s how to fix it.]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A close call in Northern Virginia revealed just how poorly data centers respond to grid disruptions. Here's how to fix the problem.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693934/it-nachrichten/one-fallen-power-line-exposed-a-growing-ai-data-center-problem-heres-how-to-fix-it/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693934/it-nachrichten/one-fallen-power-line-exposed-a-growing-ai-data-center-problem-heres-how-to-fix-it/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 15:12:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A close call in Northern Virginia revealed just how poorly data centers respond to grid disruptions. Here's how to fix the problem.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Paramount setzt Warner-Übernahme nach Wettbewerbsklagen aus]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Klagen mehrerer US-Bundesstaaten und Drehbuchautoren halten die Übernahme des Hollywood-Urgesteins Warner Brothers auf. Der Mega-Deal wird vorerst pausiert.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693918/it-nachrichten/paramount-setzt-warner-uebernahme-nach-wettbewerbsklagen-aus/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693918/it-nachrichten/paramount-setzt-warner-uebernahme-nach-wettbewerbsklagen-aus/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 14:41:55 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Klagen mehrerer US-Bundesstaaten und Drehbuchautoren halten die Übernahme des Hollywood-Urgesteins Warner Brothers auf. Der Mega-Deal wird vorerst pausiert.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Too many concurrent requests when opening ChatGPT? You’re not alone]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[ChatGPT users are seeing a “Too many concurrent requests” error while trying to open the chatbot or submit a prompt. The problem is part of a wider service disruption affecting users worldwide.



ChatGPT is currently facing an outage



OpenAI’s official status page confirms elevated error rates...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693856/ios-mac-os/too-many-concurrent-requests-when-opening-chatgpt-youre-not-alone/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693856/ios-mac-os/too-many-concurrent-requests-when-opening-chatgpt-youre-not-alone/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 13:19:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ChatGPT users are seeing a “Too many concurrent requests” error while trying to open the chatbot or submit a prompt. The problem is part of a wider service disruption affecting users worldwide.



ChatGPT is currently facing an outage



OpenAI’s official status page confirms elevated error rates across ChatGPT, its APIs, and Codex. The company says it is investigating the issue, although it has not yet shared the exact cause or a recovery timeline.







Users have also reported login failures, missing conversation history, delayed responses, and prompts that fail to send. Reports appear to be coming from several regions, including India and the United States.







The concurrent requests message does not necessarily mean you opened too many chats. During an outage, overloaded servers can display the same error across many accounts.



For now, avoid repeatedly refreshing the page. Check OpenAI’s status page and try ChatGPT again after the service stabilizes.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Galaxy S26 Ultra: Samsung macht exklusives Feature noch besser]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Das Privacy-Display des Galaxy S26 Ultra ist jetzt schon hilfreich. Jetzt löst Samsung noch ein Problem des Vorzeige-Features.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693798/it-nachrichten/galaxy-s26-ultra-samsung-macht-exklusives-feature-noch-besser/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693798/it-nachrichten/galaxy-s26-ultra-samsung-macht-exklusives-feature-noch-besser/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 12:13:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Das Privacy-Display des Galaxy S26 Ultra ist jetzt schon hilfreich. Jetzt löst Samsung noch ein Problem des Vorzeige-Features.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Galaxy S26 Ultra: Samsung macht exklusives Feature noch besser]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Das Privacy-Display des Galaxy S26 Ultra ist jetzt schon hilfreich. Jetzt löst Samsung noch ein Problem des Vorzeige-Features.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693794/android-tipps/galaxy-s26-ultra-samsung-macht-exklusives-feature-noch-besser/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693794/android-tipps/galaxy-s26-ultra-samsung-macht-exklusives-feature-noch-besser/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 12:09:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Das Privacy-Display des Galaxy S26 Ultra ist jetzt schon hilfreich. Jetzt löst Samsung noch ein Problem des Vorzeige-Features.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Schlechter Empfang im Büro oder Keller? Eine einzige Handy-Einstellung löst das Problem]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Dicke Wände, Tiefgarage, Untergeschoss und das Handy zeigt nur noch einen Balken. Dabei steckt in jedem modernen iPhone und Android-Smartphone eine Funktion, die genau dieses Problem behebt. Ihr müsst sie nur einmal aktivieren. Wir zeigen euch, wie das geht und worauf ihr dabei unbedingt achten s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693487/android-tipps/schlechter-empfang-im-buero-oder-keller-eine-einzige-handy-einstellung-loest-das-problem/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693487/android-tipps/schlechter-empfang-im-buero-oder-keller-eine-einzige-handy-einstellung-loest-das-problem/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:10 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Dicke Wände, Tiefgarage, Untergeschoss und das Handy zeigt nur noch einen Balken. Dabei steckt in jedem modernen iPhone und Android-Smartphone eine Funktion, die genau dieses Problem behebt. Ihr müsst sie nur einmal aktivieren. Wir zeigen euch, wie das geht und worauf ihr dabei unbedingt achten solltet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ihr räumt euer Android-Handy auf und der Speicher ist trotzdem voll? Dann macht ihr einen Fehler, den fast jeder macht]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[App lange drücken, deinstallieren, fertig – so löschen die meisten ihre Android-Apps. Das Problem: Dabei bleiben unsichtbare Datenreste zurück, die sich über Monate ansammeln und euren Speicher still und leise zumüllen. Wir zeigen euch, wie ihr Apps wirklich restlos entfernt und welchen einen Sch...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693485/android-tipps/ihr-raeumt-euer-android-handy-auf-und-der-speicher-ist-trotzdem-voll-dann-macht-ihr-einen-fehler-den-fast-jeder-macht/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693485/android-tipps/ihr-raeumt-euer-android-handy-auf-und-der-speicher-ist-trotzdem-voll-dann-macht-ihr-einen-fehler-den-fast-jeder-macht/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:15:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[App lange drücken, deinstallieren, fertig – so löschen die meisten ihre Android-Apps. Das Problem: Dabei bleiben unsichtbare Datenreste zurück, die sich über Monate ansammeln und euren Speicher still und leise zumüllen. Wir zeigen euch, wie ihr Apps wirklich restlos entfernt und welchen einen Schritt ihr dabei auf keinen Fall überspringen solltet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Linus Torvalds on AI, Junk Patches, Humans, and Godzilla]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Linus Torvalds once said LLMs might bring a 10X increase to programmer productivity. But speaking at Open Source Summit India 2026, he now says that number was "not scientific,"
reports ZDNet. "That was pulled out of my ass number, obviously."


Today, he continued, "we're at the point where hope...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693456/linux-tipps/linus-torvalds-on-ai-junk-patches-humans-and-godzilla/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693456/linux-tipps/linus-torvalds-on-ai-junk-patches-humans-and-godzilla/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:12:40 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Linus Torvalds once said LLMs might bring a 10X increase to programmer productivity. But speaking at Open Source Summit India 2026, he now says that number was "not scientific,"
reports ZDNet. "That was pulled out of my ass number, obviously."


Today, he continued, "we're at the point where hopefully it creates more productivity than it takes away," but "we certainly saw more junk being generated by LLMs than we saw useful code up until the like early this year.... it can actually be a huge drain on resources when it takes humans a lot of effort to figure out that, hey, this machine-generated report was not true." Even now, he said, "most of the good ones require more than just the LLM," because "we've had to push back quite a bit... if you find a bug with an LLM, it's not enough to just ask the LLM to make a bug report and then throw it over the fence to us. We want to see a suggested patch; we want to see the human who ran the LLM act as a kind of back-and-forth." 

Torvalds described many AI-generated patches as "mindless band-aid kind of patches... they may fix the immediate problem, but the kind of bug remains, and it just is waiting in the hallway to hit you in another place." For his own toy projects, he uses LLMs as prototypers: "I use them as a way to prototype things... quite often the code is not usable in that form, but it's a great way to try something out," while insisting that for kernel-level fixes, "LLMs, in my experience, have not been at that level yet." 

Torvalds acknowledged that some AI-found issues have been "absolutely, stunningly, I mean, interesting in a painful kind of way," especially security problems that "show up in the technology press two days later." Despite the embarrassment, he said, "I'm very much not a shoot-the-messenger kind of person. I think we're much better off with LLMs finding bugs, even when they are embarrassing, and they are things that we should probably have found two decades ago."

 

Torvalds also said he's using AI "for my own toy projects... Every time I travel to some new place, and this is the first time I've been to India, I send the kids pictures of where I am, and for some strange reason, Godzilla seems to follow me around and gets added to those pictures." 

ZDNet notes that Torvalds concluded, "There are many useful and less useful uses for AI," and "I think Godzilla is a great place to stop." 

Thanks to Slashdot reader joshuark for sharing the article.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Linus+Torvalds+on+AI%2C+Junk+Patches%2C+Humans%2C+and+Godzilla%3A+https%3A%2F%2Flinux.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F12%2F2053201%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Flinux.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F12%2F2053201%2Flinus-torvalds-on-ai-junk-patches-humans-and-godzilla%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://linux.slashdot.org/story/26/07/12/2053201/linus-torvalds-on-ai-junk-patches-humans-and-godzilla?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Linus Torvalds To Critics of AI Coding On Linux: 'Fork It. Or Just Walk Away.']]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Linus Torvalds says the Linux kernel will not ban AI-assisted coding tools, and if anti-AI absolutists have a problem with that, they can "fork it" or "walk away." An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Writing in a lengthy post on the Linux kernel mailing list this week, Torvalds...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693454/linux-tipps/linus-torvalds-to-critics-of-ai-coding-on-linux-fork-it-or-just-walk-away/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693454/linux-tipps/linus-torvalds-to-critics-of-ai-coding-on-linux-fork-it-or-just-walk-away/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:12:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Linus Torvalds says the Linux kernel will not ban AI-assisted coding tools, and if anti-AI absolutists have a problem with that, they can "fork it" or "walk away." An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Writing in a lengthy post on the Linux kernel mailing list this week, Torvalds said that "Linux is not one of those anti-AI projects, and if somebody has issues with that, they can do the open-source thing and fork it. Or just walk away." The statement came amid a lengthy thread arguing about the use of Sashiko, an "agentic Linux kernel code review system" that its creators claim can, in tests, independently find 53.6 percent of the bugs that would end up being fixed by human coders in later commits. But the tool can also waste maintainers' time by sending "false positive" reports of bugs that don't exist, at a rate Sashiko's maintainers estimate is "well within [the] 20% range."
 
In discussing whether maintainers should be subjected to a flood of these kinds of automated, AI-powered bug report emails (true or false), one poster cited the Software Freedom Conservancy's recent statement that the open source community "should support, not just tolerate, those who outright reject LLM-gen-AI systems" and that "every FOSS contributor deserves self-determination regarding LLM-gen-AI." In the face of that statement, Torvalds said that he rejects those who demand that their open source projects not accept any LLM-generated code or revisions. "We're not forcing anybody to use [LLM tools], but I will very loudly ignore people who try to argue against other people from using it," Torvalds said.
 
Torvalds said his position on this is a pragmatic one that's "based on technical merit. Not fear of new tools." And when it comes to utility, Torvalds said that "AI is a tool, just like other tools we use. And it's clearly a useful one. It may not have been that 'clearly' even just a year ago, but it's no longer in question today. Anybody who doubts that clearly hasn't actually used it." [...] While Torvalds acknowledged that "AI isn't perfect," he urged detractors to compare the output of these tools to the performance of human code maintainers. "Anybody who points to the problems at AI had better be looking in the mirror and pointing at themselves at the same time," Torvalds wrote. "Because it's not like natural intelligence is always all that great either."<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Linus+Torvalds+To+Critics+of+AI+Coding+On+Linux%3A+'Fork+It.+Or+Just+Walk+Away.'%3A+https%3A%2F%2Flinux.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F17%2F1830258%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Flinux.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F17%2F1830258%2Flinus-torvalds-to-critics-of-ai-coding-on-linux-fork-it-or-just-walk-away%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://linux.slashdot.org/story/26/07/17/1830258/linus-torvalds-to-critics-of-ai-coding-on-linux-fork-it-or-just-walk-away?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[‘Agent Kim Reactivated’ Episode 9 Recap: Kim and His Team Fight Their Way Out]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Agent Kim Reactivated Episode 9 pushes Kim and his allies into another dangerous escape mission after his carefully prepared operation falls apart. With Min-ji’s safety still uncertain, Kim joins forces with Han-su, Jin-cheol, and Sang-a while Kang-chan prepares another cruel surprise.




Releas...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693443/ios-mac-os/agent-kim-reactivated-episode-9-recap-kim-and-his-team-fight-their-way-out/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693443/ios-mac-os/agent-kim-reactivated-episode-9-recap-kim-and-his-team-fight-their-way-out/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 10:05:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Agent Kim Reactivated Episode 9 pushes Kim and his allies into another dangerous escape mission after his carefully prepared operation falls apart. With Min-ji’s safety still uncertain, Kim joins forces with Han-su, Jin-cheol, and Sang-a while Kang-chan prepares another cruel surprise.




Release date: July 24, 2026



Streaming platform: Netflix



Total episodes: 10



Finale release date: July 25, 2026




The Korean drama follows an ordinary office worker who reveals his past as a highly trained black-ops agent after his daughter disappears. The series stars So Ji-sub as Manager Kim, alongside Choi Dae-hoon, Yoon Kyung-ho, Joo Sang-wook, Son Na-eun, and Seo Su-min.



Spoilers ahead for Agent Kim Reactivated Episode 9



Episode 9 begins with Kim’s latest operation failing to go according to plan. After being captured and tortured in the previous episode, Kim remains trapped between the National Special Missions Bureau, enemies from his past, and Kang-chan’s personal revenge campaign.



Kim refuses to surrender because reaching Min-ji remains his only priority. He once again relies on the skills he spent years hiding, although the episode makes it clear that he cannot complete this mission alone.



Han-su and Jin-cheol return to help their old friend, bringing their familiar mix of action and humour into the tense situation. Sang-a also becomes an important part of the escape plan. Together, the four characters attempt to break free before Kang-chan can carry out the next stage of his revenge.



Kang-chan reveals another plan



The biggest problem is that Kang-chan has already expected Kim to fight back. He keeps another secret weapon ready, forcing Kim and the other fathers to change their strategy while they are already under pressure.



Kang-chan’s actions continue the conflict that began with the bullying involving Min-ji and Hye-ri. What started as a dispute between their daughters has grown into a violent battle shaped by pride, power, and revenge.



The episode also brings the three fathers closer together. Han-su and Jin-cheol understand that Kim will risk his life for Min-ji, so they choose to remain beside him even when the chances of escaping become smaller.



Where is the story heading?



Episode 9 serves as the final setup before the conclusion. Kim has survived capture, reunited with Min-ji, and faced people connected to his hidden life, but Kang-chan still controls the final threat.



The remaining conflict now depends on whether Kim can protect his daughter without losing the friends who followed him into danger. The extended finale airs on July 25 at 9:45 p.m. KST, five minutes earlier than the show’s usual broadcast time.



What did you think about Kim, Han-su, Jin-cheol, and Sang-a’s escape mission in Agent Kim Reactivated Episode 9? Let us know what you expect from the finale in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Hacks.Mozilla.Org: PACT: Anonymous Credentials for the Web]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This is the technical companion to our update on Distilled, “Keeping the web open and private in the bot era.” Here we take a deeper look at the problem space, the design we’re proposing, and the problems still left to solve. 
Bots (and privacy-preserving browsers) not welcome 
Browse a news site...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693291/tools/hacksmozillaorg-pact-anonymous-credentials-for-the-web/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693291/tools/hacksmozillaorg-pact-anonymous-credentials-for-the-web/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:27 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="c43"><em><span class="c11 c1">This is the technical companion to our update on Distilled, </span><span class="c11 c1 c17"><a class="c5" href="https://blog.mozilla.org/en/privacy-security/keeping-the-web-open-and-private-in-the-bot-era/">“Keeping the web open and private in the bot era.”</a></span><span class="c11 c1"> Here we take a deeper look at the problem space, the design we’re proposing, and the problems still left to </span><span class="c1 c11">solve</span></em><span class="c13 c11 c1"><em>.</em> </span></p>
<h3 class="c24"><span class="c2 c1">Bots (and privacy-preserving browsers) not welcome </span></h3>
<p class="c40"><span class="c0">Browse a news site in a private window. Shop at a major retailer with a VPN. Visit a video streaming platform with anti-fingerprinting defenses tuned up. You’ll see the same responses: registration walls, block pages, and endless CAPTCHAs. The message is clear: </span><span class="c13 c11 c1">if we think you might be a bot, you’re not welcome</span><span class="c0">. </span></p>
<p class="c53"><span class="c0">Websites have valid reasons for wanting to block bots. Bots enable volumetric abuse</span><span class="c1">, abuse that wouldn’t otherwise be feasible if they had to be carried out by humans</span><span class="c0">. </span><span class="c0"> For example</span><span class="c1">: SEO comment spam, credential stuffing and DDoSing</span><span class="c0">.</span><span class="c0"> Consequently many sites employ dedicated anti-abuse tooling which aims to keep the bots out whilst minimizing friction for human visitors. </span></p>
<p class="c21"><span class="c0">Unfortunately, that tooling is increasingly failing at both tasks. Browser privacy protections are </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/fingerprinting-protections/">dismantling</a></span><span class="c0"> the passive signals that anti-abuse systems depended on to identify and distinguish </span><span class="c0">visitors</span><span class="c0">. Meanwhile advances in generative AI have rendered CAPTCHAs ineffective: bots now solve them </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.usenix.org/system/files/usenixsecurity23-searles.pdf">faster and more reliably</a></span><span class="c0"> than </span><span class="c0">humans</span><span class="c0">. </span></p>
<p class="c33"><span class="c0">Many sites are switching to more invasive mechanisms and now ask visitors to disclose </span><span class="c1">identifying information</span><span class="c0">,</span><span class="c0"> e.g. an email address, a federated login or </span><span class="c1">disabling their VPN</span><span class="c0">. This means greater friction for users, since providing these details on a first visit takes time. It also compromises their privacy, since these details enable the same kinds of cross-site tracking that browser privacy protections were intended to mitigate. </span></p>
<p class="c38"><span class="c0">This </span><span class="c1">leaves</span><span class="c0"> users </span><span class="c1">with a</span><span class="c0"> dilemma. The more effectively they protect their privacy, the harder it is for websites to distinguish them from bots and the worse the treatment they receive. Website operators are also suffering. The additional friction they inflict upon well-behaved visitors harms their site, but many are willing to pay the costs if it mitigates volumetric abuse. </span></p>
<p class="c44"><span class="c1">Browser-based AI agents make this tension more acute. Sites may want to allow agents which are acting on behalf of individual users while blocking agents engaged in volumetric abuse. However, with no effective mechanisms to distinguish the two, websites are opting to block </span><span class="c17 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/epdf/10.1145/3730567.3732913">both</a></span><span class="c0">. That hurts users, who should be free to choose the user agent they use to access the web; it hurts new browsers and agents, which struggle to interoperate; and it hurts sites, which lose legitimate visitors.</span></p>
<p class="c30"><span class="c0">The consequence is that the web gets worse for everyone. Users get more friction or less privacy or both. Website operators see more volumetric abuse and the friction they add drives away users </span><span class="c1">who</span><span class="c0"> would otherwise want to consume their content or services. New user</span><span class="c1"> </span><span class="c0">agents struggle to access the same content as conventional browsers. </span></p>
<h3 class="c12"><span class="c20 c1">The</span><span class="c20 c1"> Costs of </span><span class="c2 c1">Convenient</span><span class="c2 c1"> Solutions</span></h3>
<p class="c9"><span class="c0">Some large ecosystem players have put forward solutions that leverage their control of the dominant operating systems and their deep integration with consumer hardware. These rely on device attestation: identifiers and privileged code baked into devices at the hardware level, which let manufacturers prove what software is running on a user’s device. Exposing this functionality to the web means attesting to sites that the user is running approved software with trusted hardware and therefore isn’t a bot. There have been two substantive proposals.</span></p>
<p class="c9"><span class="c0">Google’s Web Environment Integrity, <a href="https://www.theregister.com/software/2023/11/02/google-abandons-web-environment-integrity-api-proposal/335969">abandoned in 2023</a>, was the blunt version. It attested to the user agent itself, as well as the operating system and device in use. Users would have lost control in two ways: once to the attester, which would decide which operating systems and devices could be blessed, and again to the website, which would decide which software to accept. If sites had adopted allow-lists of approved user agents, building a new browser would have become virtually impossible, and sites could have withdrawn access from any user agent they chose.</span></p>
<p class="c9"><span class="c0">Apple’s Private Access Tokens, <a href="https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=huqjyh7k">deployed</a> across their ecosystem in 2022, have more subtle issues. Built on the Privacy Pass protocol standardized at the IETF, they get a lot right: a user receives a renewed, limited batch of one-time tokens that can be presented to websites without linking their visits together. This provides privacy for users and has shown rate limits to be an effective tool for sites – both points we’ll return to later in this post.</span></p>
<p class="c9"><span class="c1">However, Private Access Tokens rely on device attestation, requiring that the hardware manufacturer be in overall control of the user’s device. Presenting a PAT tells a website you are locked into Apple’s rules for what counts as acceptable software. </span><span class="c1">Due to PAT’s technical design</span><sup class="c1"><a href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=48374#:~:text=PAT%20requires">[1]</a></sup><span class="c1">, there’s no way to open the system to other sources of scarcity without compromising the system’s privacy properties, meaning that if more widely deployed, access to the web would</span><span class="c1"> become tied to having bought expensive hardware from a small, hard to change set of vendors</span><span class="c1">. </span></p>
<p class="c9"><span class="c1">Both approaches are ultimately hostile to users and to the openness of the web. Both are premised on parts of a user’s device that sit within the manufacturer’s control and beyond the user’s own. Were they widely deployed, the web would become just another walled garden with centralized gatekeepers controlling acceptable hardware, operating systems and software. As convenient as these solutions are for the players who already dominate the ecosystem, we think there’s a better path.</span></p>
<h3 class="c24"><span class="c2 c1">A Better Path Forward </span></h3>
<p class="c24"><span class="c1">Bots’ harms arise from their ability to operate beyond human scale. For sites to prevent volumetric abuse they</span><span class="c0"> don’t actually need to know </span><span class="c1">the user’s</span><span class="c0"> identity or </span><span class="c1">receive cryptographic</span><span class="c0"> proof that they’re running approved softwar</span><span class="c1">e. If sites knew their visitors were restricted to a rate </span><span class="c1">limit</span><span class="c1"> set by a site, that would be enough.  </span></p>
<p class="c34"><span class="c1">Rate limits</span><span class="c0"> only make sense if </span><span class="c1">they’re</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c1">tied to</span><span class="c0"> something scarce; something an attacker can’t cheaply replicate to evade the limit. </span><span class="c0">Without anchoring to a scarce resource, like the trusted hardware used in Private Access Tokens, attackers can generate as many fresh identities as they need to bypass the rate limit. </span></p>
<p class="c56"><span class="c1">However, </span><span class="c0">hardware is just one option for </span><span class="c1">scarcity</span><span class="c0">. Anything a user already has that an attacker can’t trivially spin up at scale will work</span><span class="c1">: e</span><span class="c0">mail addresses and phone numbers are naturally scarce</span><span class="c1">. A paid subscription costs an attacker the same as a real user.  </span><span class="c0">Even maintaining an account on a free service requires </span><span class="c1">some</span><span class="c0"> non-trivial work. </span></p>
<p class="c39"><span class="c0">What if we could use these scarce signals across the web? We</span><span class="c1"> could build </span><span class="c0">an open ecosystem with many parties offering scarcity signals, each site choosing which to accept. By </span><span class="c0">opening up who can provide a signal, and letting sites choose which to accept, we can avoid transferring control to device manufacturers and the resulting harms. </span></p>
<p class="c39"><span class="c1">As a concrete example of who might be well positioned to provide such a signal, we can consider VPN providers acting as a subscription service. Sites routinely block VPN users indiscriminately, whether through a deliberate policy choice or through an indirect consequence of rate limiting visitors per IP address. But a VPN subscription is a perfect source of scarcity. If the VPN provider could vouch for its users so that sites could rate limit each user individually – then users would be able to browse the web with less friction and without giving up their VPN usage. </span></p>
<p class="c35"><span class="c0">The catch is that building </span><span class="c1">a system that can enable this</span><span class="c0"> on the open web whilst </span><span class="c1">maintaining user’s privacy</span><span class="c0"> is genuinely difficult. </span><span class="c1">It requires that we take information from one site — that this user holds some scarce thing — and expose it to other sites so that they can use that as the basis for their rate limiting. </span><span class="c0">Letting one site verify a signal from another is </span><span class="c1">the sort of </span><span class="c0">information flow</span><span class="c1"> </span><span class="c0">that privacy-pr</span><span class="c1">eserving </span><span class="c0">browsers have spent the last decade locking down to </span><span class="c1">prevent cross-site tracking</span><span class="c0">. </span></p>
<p class="c35"><span class="c1">Our goal would be that no more than the minimum information gets through: a single bit communicating whether the user is below the rate limit set by the site. Leaking anything more – like the source of the scarcity that the rate limit is anchored to – would be unacceptable. Enabling a new cross-site information flow might feel like compromising privacy to gain better access, but reality is more nuanced. If a new system moves sites away from demanding that visitors be identifiable (whether through fingerprinting or login forms), </span><span class="c1">it can be a win for both privacy and access.</span></p>
<h3 class="c24"><span class="c2 c1">The Foundations </span></h3>
<p class="c50"><span class="c0">The good news is that the cryptographic foundations for a privacy preserving approach already exist. The </span><span class="c1 c3"><a class="c5" href="https://privacypass.github.io/">Privacy Pass protocol</a></span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://privacypass.github.io/&amp;sa=D&amp;source=editors&amp;ust=1782228494401139&amp;usg=AOvVaw3uoXdqARBZKjQF5H8uwYKY">,</a></span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.petsymposium.org/2018/files/papers/issue3/popets-2018-0026.pdf">originally developed in 2018</a></span><span class="c0"> to reduce the friction of Cloudflare CAPTCHAs for Tor users, introduced the core primitive: a token that is </span><span class="c13 c11 c1">unlinkable </span><span class="c0">between issuance and redemption. You prove something to an issuer (e.g. by </span><span class="c1">solving a CAPTCHA</span><span class="c0">), receive some tokens, and later present a token to a website. The website can verify the token is legitimate, but can’t link it to the user it was issued to. </span></p>
<p><img alt="A diagram showing the protocol flow for Privacy Pass." class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-48375" height="1639" src="https://hacks.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/pact-drawings-1.excalidraw1-scaled.png" width="2560"></p>
<p class="c27"><img alt="" title=""><span class="c20 c1 c57"><strong>Figure 1</strong>: </span><span class="c0"><em>In Privacy Pass, a CAPTCHA provider can issue tokens to a client which can then be used to bypass challenges for future site visits. Even if the CAPTCHA provider and sites collude, they can’t use the tokens to identify the user or their browsing history.</em> </span></p>
<p class="c52"><span class="c0">Privacy Pass has gone on to be successfully deployed in systems where the issuer and verifier have a prior trust relationship: </span><span class="c0">Apple</span><span class="c0"> uses it to authenticate users of </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/feed/">Private Cloud Compute</a></span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c1">and</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.apple.com/privacy/docs/iCloud_Private_Relay_Overview_Dec2021.PDF">Private Rel</a></span><span class="c17 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.apple.com/privacy/docs/iCloud_Private_Relay_Overview_Dec2021.PDF&amp;sa=D&amp;source=editors&amp;ust=1782228494402463&amp;usg=AOvVaw0KGoiSPg-8NLvNvIiSSbPt">ay</a></span><span class="c1"> </span><span class="c0">without linking their activity to their identity, </span><span class="c0">Chrome</span><span class="c0"> uses it for </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://github.com/GoogleChrome/ip-protection">two-hop IP protection</a></span><span class="c0">, and </span><span class="c0">Kagi</span><span class="c0"> uses it to provide </span><span class="c17 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://help.kagi.com/kagi/privacy/privacy-pass.html">private search</a></span><span class="c0">. </span><span class="c0">These deployments work in part because a small number of parties have agreed in advance on who issues tokens and who accepts them. </span></p>
<p class="c18"><span class="c0">Applying this approach to an open system where any site can act as</span><span class="c0"> an issuer</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k3QJG2D_Sq4zJiJRn9DfY80hEHuz9UWrJdTt8LbRsMM/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.r8jxzjcoeumo">brings real challenges</a></span><span class="c0">.</span><span class="c0"> Firstly, even though tokens are unlinkable, knowing a user has access to a specific issuer is a privacy leak on its own, because you can infer that the user meets the relevant issuance criteria. </span><span class="c1">If one site can learn that you have a token from another site, that reveals that you have been to that site, which can be a major privacy problem. </span><span class="c0">This compounds if </span><span class="c1">sites </span><span class="c0">can learn the set of issuers </span><span class="c1">you have visited</span><span class="c0">, since it becomes a fingerprint which can be used to identify </span><span class="c1">you</span><span class="c0">. </span></p>
<p class="c8"><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2014/11/27/zero-knowledge-proofs-illustrated-primer/">Generic techniques</a></span><span class="c0"> exist for proving a statement in zero knowledge: we can prove that </span><span class="c1">a client</span><span class="c0"> ha</span><span class="c1">s</span><span class="c0"> a token from a set of acceptable issuers without revealing which specific issuer it is. We’ll call this issuer blinding. </span><span class="c0">The generic approach is often slow, but </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-orru-zkproof-sigma-protocols-01.html">bespoke approaches</a></span><span class="c0"> tailored to the underlying cryptography can improve this considerably. </span></p>
<p class="c54"><span class="c0">Another challenge is how sites using rate limits decide who to trust to issue tokens. If an issuer misbehaves then the site’s rate limits become ineffective, enabling volumetric abuse. However, if we need to prevent the site from learning which issuers a user has access to, the site is only going to know that one of its trusted issuers was used, not which one. This makes mistakes or misbehaviour by an issuer difficult to detect, and makes it hard for sites to evaluate new issuers. Solving this challenge is essential for openness. Without adequate information, </span><span class="c0">sites are likely to lean towards conservative issuer selection. </span><span class="c1">That could lead to less choice between Anchors, which in turn could lead to a new form of gatekeeper being created.</span><span class="c0"> </span></p>
<p class="c32"><span class="c0">To solve this, sites at least need a way to calculate an aggregate score for each issuer they use. This should roughly correspond to how much of the traffic it considers abusive to have come from users using that particular issuer. Mozilla has long invested in systems like </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://blog.mozilla.org/en/firefox/partnership-ohttp-prio/">Prio</a></span><span class="c0"> which use multiparty computation (MPC) to protect user privacy whilst enabling aggregate measurements of system behaviour. </span></p>
<p class="c59"><span class="c0">Privacy Pass also struggles to handle dynamic adjustments to rate limits. Once tokens have been issued, they’re difficult to invalidate without either revoking all active tokens or risking attacks which can compromise the privacy of users. It’s also beneficial if sites can adjust rate limits on a per </span><span class="c1">client</span><span class="c0"> basis, for example by increasing rate limits where they become more confident the </span><span class="c1">client</span><span class="c0"> is benign and withdrawing access </span><span class="c1">when abuse is detected</span><span class="c0">. </span></p>
<p class="c47"><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-schlesinger-cfrg-act-00.html">Anonymous Credit Tokens</a></span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c0">offer a useful building block to solve this problem. Conventional Privacy Pass schemes rely on issuing a bucket of tokens but ACT works differently by enabling the use of a credential with state. For example, an ACT credential can hold an internal counter. When the credential is presented, the site can check the counter is over some threshold and mutate it, increasing or decreasing </span><span class="c1">the counter whenever</span><span class="c0"> the site’s perception of the holder has improved or worsened. Critically, the exact value is never leaked to the site, preventing the site from tracking the holder and ensuring successive presentations of the same credential can’t be linked. </span></p>
<h3 class="c24"><span class="c2 c1">Putting it together </span></h3>
<p class="c19"><span class="c1">So how can we combine these techniques to build a system which can enable privacy-preserving rate limiting on the open web? In May 2026, we participated in a </span><a href="https://pactworkshop.com/"><span class="c17 c1">W3C CG Meeting</span></a><span class="c0"> in collaboration with Cloudflare, Chrome and other web stakeholders in which we started sketching out a design we’re calling PACT – Private Access Control Tokens. </span></p>
<p class="c19"><span class="c0">Rate limits need a starting point, a source of scarcity to anchor on. We’ll call an entity that provides such a source an </span><span class="c2 c1">Anchor</span><span class="c0">. To a user who meets the Anchor’s criteria, like having a subscription,</span><span class="c0"> an account in good standing</span><span class="c0">, or a verified phone number, an Anchor issues a batch of </span><span class="c2 c1">Endorsement </span><span class="c0">tokens, following the Privacy Pass model. In practice, Anchors could be any website which has access to this kind of signal. An Endorsement conveys</span><span class="c1"> </span><span class="c0">scarcity to other sites. </span></p>
<p class="c51"><span class="c0">That’s enough for a simple system where access is </span><span class="c1">either granted or denied</span><span class="c0">. But as we discussed earlier, we also want the ability to increase access where a visitor behaves benignly and decrease it where they don’t. </span><span class="c1">The state needed to enforce a rate limit</span><span class="c0"> can’t live in the Endorsement, because Endorsements cross trust boundaries between unrelated sites. We need a second object that can hold that state, scoped to the party that maintains it. </span></p>
<p class="c48"><span class="c0">We’ll call that the party that handles rate limiting for a site a </span><span class="c2 c1">Moderator </span><span class="c0">and the stateful object a </span><span class="c2 c1">Credential</span><span class="c0">. </span><span class="c1">A Credential is specific to a Moderator and, unlike endorsements, we limit each site to nominating a single Moderator. In the common case the site itself plays the Moderator role, so there’s no new entity or trust boundary. </span><span class="c1">A Moderator can also be a third-party service shared across many sites, allowing those sites to cooperatively share a rate limit.</span><span class="c0"> </span></p>
<p class="c48"><span class="c0">In the terminology of the previous section, the Anchor is the issuer of Endorsements, and the Moderator both verifies Endorsements and issues Credentials. A Moderator manages rate-limit policy: it decides which Anchors it trusts, accepts their Endorsements, and issues a Credential in return.</span></p>
<p class="c14"><img alt="" title=""><img alt="A diagram showing an overview of the PACT system" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-48381" height="1655" src="https://hacks.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/pact-drawings-5.excalidraw21-scaled.png" width="2560"></p>
<p class="c14"><strong><span class="c1 c20">Figure 2: </span></strong><span class="c1"><em>(1) Clients acquire Endorsements from Anchors in the course of normal browsing to sites they have relationships with. (2) Clients can exchange Endorsements for a stateful Credential from a Moderator. (3) Credentials can be used to access sites which use that Moderator. Credentials can be updated over time.</em> </span></p>
<p class="c41"><span class="c0">Directly revealing which Anchor backed an Endorsement would leak a lot of information about the user. The issuer blinding techniques from the previous section solve this: when an Endorsement is redeemed, the Moderator only learns that it came from one of </span><span class="c1">the </span><span class="c0">Anchors it trusts, but not which one. </span></p>
<p class="c28"><span class="c0">When a Moderator covers more than one site, we let Credentials be presented across all of them but partition cookies and storage as</span><span class="c1"> we would for any other third party site</span><span class="c0">. The unlinkability of </span><span class="c1">Credential</span><span class="c0"> presentations keeps this from creating a new cross-site identifier. The benefit is that good behaviour on one site improves access on every site the Moderator covers, and bad behaviour cuts it everywhere. Websites can already build the same capability with a shared account system, so this doesn’t create a new way to lock users out, but it </span><span class="c1">does provide a</span><span class="c0"> new way to grant access without requiring users to give up their privacy. </span></p>
<p class="c28"><span class="c0">Enabling Moderators that cover many sites carries a centralisation risk, simila</span><span class="c1">r </span><span class="c0">to the concentration we see today in anti-abuse providers. The mitigation is that the choice of Moderator stays with each site, and the choice of trusted Anchors stays with each Moderator. Th</span><span class="c1">is</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c1">can’t</span><span class="c0"> reverse the centralisation pressure the web already faces, but it </span><span class="c1">ensures this system won’t lead to additional lock-in</span><span class="c0">: a new Anchor or a new Moderator can be adopted without coordinating with a dominant vendor. </span></p>
<p class="c46"><span class="c0">The </span><span class="c1">system then has three flows</span><span class="c0">.</span><span class="c0"> First, the user </span><span class="c1">receives</span><span class="c0"> Endorsements from an Anchor in the course of normal interaction</span><span class="c1">, based on the Anchor’s positive view of the user</span><span class="c0">. This is </span><span class="c0">a relatively rare operation for any given user and Anchor. After all, as our source of scarcity, Endorsements should not be too easy to accumulate.</span></p>
<p class="c10"><img alt="" title=""><img alt="A diagram showing the PACT Anchor Flow" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-48377" height="1789" src="https://hacks.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/pact-drawings-3.excalidraw1-scaled.png" width="2560"></p>
<p class="c10"><strong><span class="c20 c1">Figure 3</span></strong><span class="c1">: <em>In the course of normal browsing, clients browse to websites they have a relationship with. These sites can act as Anchors by issuing Endorsements to clients.</em></span></p>
<p class="c26"><span class="c0">Second, when the user arrives at a site that works with a Moderator, the browser spends an Endorsement from an Anchor the Moderator trusts and receives a Credential in return. The presentation hides </span><span class="c13 c11 c1">which </span><span class="c0">Anchor was used, and </span><span class="c1">neither the Anchor nor the Moderator can trace the Endorsement back to where it was issued</span><span class="c0">. The Moderator decides what initial balance the Credential starts with. If the user has no Endorsements from suitable Anchors at all, existing mechanisms (CAPTCHAs, account creation, federated login) </span><span class="c1">could be used to</span><span class="c0"> bootstrap a Credential the same way, so the system degrades to today’s experience rather than locking the user out.</span></p>
<p class="c7"><img alt="" title=""><img alt="A diagram showing the protocol flow between Anchors and Moderators" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-48378" height="1789" src="https://hacks.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/pact-drawings-4.excalidraw1-scaled.png" width="2560"></p>
<p class="c7"><span class="c20 c1"><strong>Figure 4</strong></span><span class="c1"><strong>:</strong><em> When the client browses to a site, it can prompt the client for a Credential from the Moderator it uses. If the Client doesn’t have a suitable Credential, but does have a suitable Endorsement, it can exchange it for a Credential with the Moderator. In practice, the Moderator and the Site might be the same server. </em></span><em><span class="c0"> </span></em></p>
<p class="c25"><span class="c0">Third, as the user browses, the browser presents the Credential and the Moderator updates </span><span class="c1">the internal state of the Credential</span><span class="c0">. The </span><span class="c1">Moderator can reward </span><span class="c0">behaviour that looks benign and </span><span class="c1">penalize suspicious activity</span><span class="c0">, </span><span class="c1">but can’t track the use of the Credential or identify it if it’s used on other sites the Moderator covers</span><span class="c0">. </span><span class="c0">Revocation falls out of the same mechanism: a Moderator </span><span class="c1">can refuse to return an updated Credential</span><span class="c0">.</span><span class="c0"> </span></p>
<p class="c7"><img alt="" title=""><img alt="A diagram showing the PACT Moderator Flow" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-48379" height="1618" src="https://hacks.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/pact-drawings-5.excalidraw1-scaled.png" width="2560"></p>
<p class="c7"><strong><span class="c20 c1">Figure 5</span></strong><span class="c0"><strong>:</strong> <em>The Client can present the Credential on sites which use the matching Moderator. Sites can check if the Credential is in good standing. The sites can then adjust the access the Credential has in response to behaviour. E.g. increasing it when they gain confidence in the client or reducing it in response to malicious behaviour.</em></span></p>
<p class="c23"><span class="c0">In practice, all of this would happen transparently to the user through a WebAPI that sites acting as Anchors or Moderators would call from JavaScript. In an ideal ecosystem, users would accumulate Endorsements through normal browsing, just by virtue of the sites they already visit, and the rest of the flow would happen in the background as they move around the web, leaving </span><span class="c1">users</span><span class="c0"> with meaningfully less friction. </span></p>
<p class="c16"><span class="c0">AI agents acting on behalf of a user slot into the same flow. An agent can carry its user’s Credentials, in which case the user remains accountable for how the agent </span><span class="c1">behaves.</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c1">S</span><span class="c0">ites would not need to grant any more access than they would to the user themselves. Alternatively, the operator of an agent can run its own Anchor and vouch for its agents the way other Anchors vouch for human users. </span><span class="c0">Sites retain control over which Anchors they accept, so they can choose how to treat agent traffic without needing a separate detection mechanism. </span></p>
<p class="c6"><span class="c0">Several mechanisms combine to keep the information about a user that flows out close to a single bit. Cryptographic unlinkability ensures successive Credential presentations cannot be tied to each other or to the original issuance, so a user’s visits cannot be </span><span class="c1">joined</span><span class="c0"> into a history. Each site is bound to a single Moderator, so the set of Moderators a user has Credentials with never becomes a cross-site fingerprint. The Anchor-to-Credential exchange happens in an isolated browsing context, so during ordinary browsing the only thing the site or its Moderator ever observes is a Credential presentation: </span><span class="c1">the site only learns if </span><span class="c0">the user has a valid Credential below the rate limit, or </span><span class="c1">nothing</span><span class="c0">. </span><span class="c1">W</span><span class="c0">hen the Moderator updates a </span><span class="c1">Credential</span><span class="c0">, it</span><span class="c0"> adjusts the credentials state without learning what it is.</span></p>
<p class="c6"><span class="c1">The additional privacy given to users from </span><span class="c0">Issuer blinding</span><span class="c1"> makes participating in the system more challenging for Moderators</span><span class="c0">. Because the Moderator can’t see which Anchor backed a Credential at issuance, it can’t give a Credential from a strong Anchor </span><span class="c1">more access</span><span class="c0"> than one from a weak Anchor: doing so would itself leak which Anchor was used. The initial </span><span class="c1">access</span><span class="c0"> has to be uniform across the Moderator’s whole pool of Anchors, which in practice means setting it at the strength of the weakest. </span><span class="c1">However, this is only relevant for that initial access, the Moderator can update credentials according to the holder’s behavior, enabling Credential’s to accrue access over time.</span></p>
<p class="c42"><span class="c0">Building an open ecosystem also requires that sites can make effective decisions about the Anchors they choose to trust</span><span class="c1">. M</span><span class="c0">ultiparty computation systems like </span><span class="c0">Prio</span><span class="c0"> enable aggregate scoring without compromising pr</span><span class="c1">ivacy</span><span class="c0">. When users present Credentials, they can provide an encrypted share which identifies the anchor they use</span><span class="c1">d and can be privately aggregated to compute the quality of an issuer.</span></p>
<h3 class="c24"><span class="c2 c1">Next Steps </span></h3>
<p class="c49"><span class="c1">We think the</span><span class="c0"> architecture we</span><span class="c1">’ve </span><span class="c0">sketched </span><span class="c1">for PACT </span><span class="c0">has the right shape, but many of the details still need to be worked out</span><span class="c1"> and the entire system needs rigorous privacy and security analysis.</span></p>
<p class="c45"><span class="c0">We want to do that work in the open. The IETF is the natural venue for the cryptographic protocols underneath, and the W3C for the WebAPI surface that sits on top. </span><span class="c0">We’ll be </span><span class="c1">bringing</span><span class="c0"> </span><span class="c3 c1"><a class="c5" href="https://github.com/Moderation-of-unLinkable-Endorsements">draft specifications</a></span><span class="c1"> to these bodies as soon as they’re ready</span><span class="c0">, and we welcome collaborators from across the ecosystem: browser vendors, site operators, anti-abuse providers, and the cryptography community. </span></p>
<p class="c29"><span class="c0">If successful, we think we can provide a system which will keep the web open and </span><span class="c1">private</span><span class="c0">, while still giving sites the rate-limiting signal they need. </span></p>
<h3 class="c29"><span class="c2 c1">Acknowledgements</span></h3>
<p class="c4"><em><span class="c11 c1">The ideas described here are the result of collaboration and conversations with many people, including: Watson Ladd, Thibault Meunier, Michele Orrù, Trevor Perrin, Eric Rescorla, Samuel Schlesinger, Martin Thomson, Eric Trouton, Benjamin Vandersloot &amp; Cathie Yun.</span></em><span class="c11 c1"><em> </em> </span></p>
<hr class="c58">
<div>
<p class="c31"><a href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/?p=48374#:~:text=%5B1%5D">[1]</a><span class="c0"> PAT requires that the source of scarcity and an independent issuer be trusted not to collude. If they do, they can track users as they interact with the system. This is not suitable in the context of an open system where any party could play those two roles.</span></p>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/2026/06/pact-anonymous-credentials-for-the-web/">PACT: Anonymous Credentials for the Web</a> appeared first on <a href="https://hacks.mozilla.org/">Mozilla Hacks - the Web developer blog</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Rust Programming Language Blog: The many journeys of learning Rust]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[This is another post in our series covering what we learned through the Vision Doc process. We previously described the overall approach and what we learned about doing user research, we explored what people love about Rust, dug into what it takes to ship safety-crticial Rust, and described some ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693289/tools/the-rust-programming-language-blog-the-many-journeys-of-learning-rust/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693289/tools/the-rust-programming-language-blog-the-many-journeys-of-learning-rust/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is another post in our series covering what we learned through the Vision Doc process. We previously <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2025/12/03/lessons-learned-from-the-rust-vision-doc-process/" rel="external">described the overall approach and what we learned about doing user research</a>, we <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2025/12/19/what-do-people-love-about-rust/" rel="external">explored what people love about Rust</a>, <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/01/14/what-does-it-take-to-ship-rust-in-safety-critical/" rel="external">dug into what it takes to ship safety-crticial Rust</a>, and <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/03/20/rust-challenges/" rel="external">described some of the major challenges that people face when using Rust</a>.</em></p>
<p>In this post we walk through what folks have found on their journey to learn the Rust programming language with ups and downs covered.</p>
<p>As a disclaimer, LLMs (Large Language Models) come up in this post because our interviewees brought them up. We're scoping discussion to their use as a learning tool, covering research and example generation, not broader questions about AI (Artificial Intelligence) in software development.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#many-paths-to-needing-rust"></a>
Many paths to needing Rust</h3>
<p>The interviews surfaced several different paths into Rust: curiosity, embedded work, job-market pressure, organizational adoption, and reassignment after a team or company chose Rust. That last path matters because many learners are not evaluating Rust from a blank slate; they are trying to become productive after Rust has already arrived in their work.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Funny enough, I've advocated for more niche languages than Rust in the past. Rust has pretty much stopped being as much of a niche language as it was, but it's not Java." -- Fractional CTO</p>
</blockquote>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#rust-learning-resources"></a>
Rust learning resources</h3>
<p>Likely as expected, the folks that we talked to reach for a range of resources to learn Rust. Some reach for official documentation, such as <a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/" rel="external">The Rust Programming Language Book</a> and find that sufficient to build on what the compiler was already showing them.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I started with the official Rust documentation because there are a lot of great examples of how features like the borrow checker work." -- Software engineer at an Automotive supplier</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Others needed more passes and more formats, sometimes reaching for resources the community maintains, such as <a href="https://rustlings.rust-lang.org/" rel="external">Rustlings</a>, <a href="https://danielkeep.github.io/tlborm/book/index.html" rel="external">The Little Book of Rust Macros</a>, and <a href="https://rust-unofficial.github.io/too-many-lists/" rel="external">Learn Rust With Entirely Too Many Linked Lists</a>.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"The first time I went through the chapter in [The Rust Programming Language] on borrow checking, I was like, what is this? I read it again, then I watched a YouTube video of someone explaining the chapter." -- Rust freelance consultant</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"Rust book, Rustlings, Zero to Production in Rust, Jon Gjengset tutorials. A bunch of books. It's not a one-pass reading. Can't say how many times I've gone through it." -- Software engineer working on video streaming and storage</p>
</blockquote>
<p>These resources have brought up an entire generation of Rust programmers. But, to some, there is a perception that these resources have trouble keeping pace with the language.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"We'd like to use [The Rust Programming Language/'the book'], but we've found that it's out of date, unfortunately. We've looked at the GitHub repo and found it's got a lot of unresolved issues and unmerged PRs" -- Principal Software Engineering work on Rust adoption in a regulated industry</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Whether or not this is factually true, Rust's growth has nonetheless put more scrutiny on these materials. Companies evaluating adoption and engineers getting reassigned to Rust teams are looking at them with fresh eyes and finding the gaps that affect their own evaluation.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#beginner-stumblings-and-unlearning-habits"></a>
Beginner stumblings and unlearning habits</h3>
<p>It's pretty typical for Rust to be the 2nd, 3rd or Nth programming language that someone picks up. They'd end up writing their most familiar language in Rust, whether C++ patterns, Java patterns, or whatever they knew, for months or even years. Eventually they got comfortable enough to start writing idiomatic Rust.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"There's a bit of a drop in productivity compared to C if you're already familiar with it just because you're learning new rules, new syntax."  -- Principal Firmware Engineer (mobile robotics)</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"In the beginning it was more poking around the code and adding and removing some ampersands and asterisks to try to make sense of <code>mut</code> and not <code>mut</code> and whatever." -- Senior engineer with 20 years of Java experience in cloud and IoT</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We also spoke with someone who found that not having much of a programming background seemed to benefit people picking up Rust. Not having worn-in grooves from other languages may play a role here, and it's worth investigating further.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I had someone who had never programmed much before start working on the internals of [our Rust project]. She was just fine with getting into Rust. It's more of the senior people that struggle as they need to unlearn practices which may work in other languages, but it's not the 'Rust' way." -- Researcher, Automotive OEM R&amp;D Lab</p>
</blockquote>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#learning-to-work-with-the-borrow-checker"></a>
Learning to work with the borrow checker</h3>
<p>We heard a lot about learning to work with the borrow checker instead of against it. People get there through different paths, but a few patterns came up repeatedly.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#the-compiler-as-teacher"></a>
The compiler as teacher</h4>
<p>Rust's diagnostics did the teaching on their own, especially around lifetimes.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"If you mess up the lifetimes in a piece of code that you've written by hand, I usually find that Rust's diagnostics are very helpful" -- Researcher working on static analysis of Rust programs</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"Whatever's missing, the compiler usually fills in: it tells me 'you need to declare the lifetime of this reference', so I know and can figure it out. That all generally works pretty well." -- Senior Software Engineer</p>
</blockquote>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#learning-by-doing"></a>
Learning by doing</h4>
<p>Others felt like they only really internalized the borrow checker after writing a lot of Rust. It took projects, coding challenges, prototyping and so on until at some point it clicked.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I actually did not understand the borrow checker until I spent a lot of time writing Rust" -- Founder of a startup built on Rust</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"Besides the prototyping work, I also did coding-challenge-type stuff to get familiar with Rust for Advent of Code. [..] It eventually clicked to the point where I wasn't fighting with Rust, it was working for me. I had that experience other people describe: when I managed to get my program to fit with Rust, it worked. I didn't spend time debugging." -- Principal Software Engineer, large SaaS provider</p>
</blockquote>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#letting-go-of-clone-guilt"></a>
Letting go of "clone guilt"</h4>
<p>Some learners arrive with the assumption that good Rust means zero clones, zero copies, lifetimes threaded through everything. They set the bar at optimal before they've learned how to write idiomatic Rust, and it makes the borrow checker feel harder than it needs to be at the outset.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"On one of my first projects, I was like, 'I don't ever want to copy or clone anything,' so I carefully wove through all the lifetimes and got myself into a bit of a bind. Then I saw someone else just cloning the struct I was working with, and it was super cheap. Sometimes you can just clone and it's going to be okay." -- Researcher at a university</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The experienced Rust developers we spoke with consistently said the same thing: clone freely while you're learning, then optimize when you understand the problem. Rust's reputation for performance and correctness feeds this. Newcomers assume anything less than optimal is wrong before they've written a first working program, and clone guilt is how that shows up.</p>
<p>We think it could be an interesting area of future study to check into the patterns Rust programmers employ at different levels of experience and under which circumstances. One member of the Rust Vision doc team that's very experienced with Rust noted that there's kind of an "expected shape" they understand as passing the compiler. This knowledge influences how they approach writing code which wouldn't take that shape and they naturally find themselves understanding when to use so-called workarounds, such as passing around indices into arrays or <code>Vec</code>s.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#multi-paradigm-but-not-the-oop-some-are-used-to"></a>
Multi-paradigm, but not the OOP some are used to</h3>
<p>The Rust programming language is multi-paradigm, and how that lands depends on what you're coming from. We heard some that came from a functional background were delighted with digging into learning how much Rust inherits from that lineage. Some others noted that they and others on their teams struggled to unlearn the object-oriented style they'd come to use heavily in other languages like C++ and Java.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Developers coming from C++ tend to think object-oriented. I think that's a difference between C++ and Rust." -- Architect at Automotive OEM</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"I had exactly that thing, where I would apply all my years of Java and JS thinking, where I could just create some object, not care about it, return it, have it sloshing around between various functions. Found myself reaching for these patterns and then being told 'no, you cannot do that'." -- Principal Engineer at a SaaS company</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Developers coming from functional programming had less to unlearn: strong typing, pattern matching, and an expression-oriented style were already familiar.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"My background has been more functional programming, strong typing. That originated for me as a Lisper: once a Lisper, always a Lisper." -- Principal Software Engineer working on Rust tooling for safety-regulated industries</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"The languages I primarily used before Rust were things like OCaml. Way back, I came from C and C++, the classic languages, and then I spent quite a long time doing primarily pure functional stuff. These days I've ended up back in what I like to think of as a pragmatic center ground [with Rust]." -- Fractional CTO</p>
</blockquote>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#teaching-rust-in-academia"></a>
Teaching Rust in academia</h3>
<p>We spoke with a university professor that's been teaching Rust generally. In the academic environment, they were able to use proxies for some things such as "traits are like interfaces in Java" because the students had already gone through a set of courses in their first and second years that taught them Java. They introduced concepts slowly throughout the course, choosing to deal with some more complex topics like generics later. The outcome generally was that students had no problem picking up Rust in this setting.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I couldn't see any big difference on the embedded side. We also teach an embedded class, and we did an experiment. Half of the students' feedback was worse on the Rust class, mostly because they needed to build the project themselves. The C students just got one from [an LLM], absolutely no problem." -- University Professor, on teaching Rust</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The C cohort leaned on LLMs for the project in ways the Rust cohort couldn't. We don't yet have a clear answer for why.</p>
<p>What did come through clearly was the Rust cohort's experience with the community. Some students needed to figure out which drivers to use for the embedded project and how to use them. Their professor encouraged them to open issues and ask questions directly on GitHub, and the maintainers responded. Students who had never contributed to open source before were getting answers from the people who wrote the code.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#learning-using-llms"></a>
Learning using LLMs</h3>
<p>Some experienced folks shared that they saw LLMs as a tool that can help someone come up to speed quickly, either as a research tool or for generating example Rust code to understand concepts.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I'm optimistic that there's a way to work [LLMs] in that will cut down that learning curve. One of the big things these tools bring is reducing the learning curve in general; these are very good tools to help you navigate a space that you don't know yet." -- Maintainer of large open source Rust crate</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"I try [LLMs] out once a month, usually for generating an example or something like this. Just like with Stack Overflow: when you read an example, you should read it carefully and try to understand it. Not copy and paste it, but type it in your own words in code and then check it, because that's where the teeny tiny little mistakes are." -- Founder of startup built on Rust</p>
</blockquote>
<p>For some learners, an LLM is just another way to find answers, no different than a search engine.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"So for the most part, picking up Rust - how do I learn? I'll [use web search for] things, I'll ask [an LLM], I'll just poke around and read the code." -- Senior Software Engineer working in a regulated space</p>
</blockquote>
<p>One founder went further and claimed that LLMs change who can become a Rust developer. One consulting company founder described hiring high school graduates with no systems programming background and training them as Rust developers, with LLMs filling in the learning gaps that would previously have required years of experience.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"At the beginning, I was worried, but now that we have [LLMs] supporting development, the difficulty of the language doesn't matter. I'm seeing a huge opportunity behind strong runtime languages like Rust. [..] In [Developing Country] we hire 20-25 high school graduates, train them to be Rust programmers, then they enhance our workforce worldwide." -- Founder of a consulting company</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We heard this from one organization. This is a claim that the combination of Rust's compiler and LLM tooling can dramatically shorten the path from beginner to working developer. Whether it generalizes depends on questions we can't answer from a single interview: how long these developers stay, what kind of code they can maintain independently, and whether this training/learning model works outside this company's particular structure. If it holds up, the pool of people who can become Rust developers is much larger than the usual hiring profile suggests.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#organizational-considerations-for-rust-learners"></a>
Organizational considerations for Rust learners</h3>
<p>We spoke with a number of folks on teams that are using Rust in larger organizations. Teams wanted to know that everyone would end up at roughly the same level of competence, which led a good number to invest in training courses to get there. Some leaders found that staff was able to ramp well enough by reading The Rust Programming Language, going through Rustlings, and then picking up lower risk and priority tickets to work on. Having a sense of community was also important within companies; it helps people know they are not alone when they are asked to work on Rust after, say, a reorganization happens.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"[..] the idea with the class as opposed to 'just read the Rust book on your own' was that this gives everyone kind of the same baseline going in."  -- Principal Firmware Engineer (mobile robotics)</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"So typically we're going to have people work through Rustlings, work through The Rust Programming Language. We have them then start to pick up lower risk tickets to work on." -- Principal Engineer at a large SaaS provider</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>"We've got an internal Slack channel for Rust learning where people can drop questions and others will come in and answer them. That helps build up understanding and community." -- Software Engineer at a large corporation</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Some organizations found that while the person they'd hire would need to learn Rust, it was still preferable to the alternative of hiring someone for a critical piece of software written in another language.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"They needed to grow and maintain this C++ codebase. They had a C++ wizard, and they tried for about two years to find someone with the same level of expertise. They ended up hiring people that didn't know Rust and ramping them up, creating FFI bindings from the C++ side so they could work in Rust. And you can feel it: the borrow checker is teaching these people the right way to handle their systems." -- Principal Engineer at an Automotive OEM</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The community and helping each other aspect seems to grow bonds as organizations mature.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Our team is [all about] mentorship. I've mentored people coming up to speed on Rust, and people help each other hugely." -- Principal Software Engineer at a large SaaS company</p>
</blockquote>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#silent-attrition"></a>
Silent attrition</h3>
<p>We identified some cases where people have approached Rust and bounced off of it, for one reason or another. In the below case, someone with a background in a language with fewer guardrails found themselves frustrated enough with Rust to walk away.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"All of that means that that embedded ecosystem is very frustrating to somebody who comes from C and is like, why can't I just get a pointer to this peripheral and then write into the registers. What are you doing to me? [..] My friend never got over that. He looked at it and said, I'm not going to deal with this and walked away." -– A second University Professor</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There may be language features that for a particular domain are not seen as comfortable or usable yet, such as async Rust usage in a safety domain. We'd like to map which language features feel off-limits in which domains; async in safety-critical work probably isn't the only case.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"We're not fully sure how async [Rust] will work out in the long run in our domain. [..] People don't feel comfortable yet since C++14 doesn't provide such concepts. [..] It's the chicken-and-egg problem again: we probably need to gain some experience to see whether we can actually benefit from these new concepts in the automotive and safety domains." -- Team Lead at Automotive Supplier (ASIL D target)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>We heard in at least one case, that while the language was challenging and there was a near bounce, the tooling helped keep them coming back and trying.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Well, I think my early impressions of Rust - one is I find C++ so intimidating, and I think a big part of why I was able to succeed at [..] learning Rust is the tooling. I mean, all this makes sense [..] but it's like, for me, getting started with Rust, the language was challenging, but the tooling was incredibly easy." -- Founder of another startup built on Rust</p>
</blockquote>
<p>While it might be considered more of a community concern, if there are interactions online and in spaces that point to learners having
so-called "skill issues" this feeds into the narrative that Rust must be hard to learn. We may be unintentionally turning away Rust Project contributors and maintainers due to the vibes being put out when new learners show up in certain spaces.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"People are very helpful, but generally the attitude is: if your program is very complicated, it's mostly a skill issue. There's not that much empathy when people get stuck learning, and a lot of people are just pushed away by it. There's probably a huge number of people who silently stop wanting to write Rust, because at some point it gets complicated and the feedback they get is 'you just need to be a better programmer, obviously'." -- Software Engineer at a SaaS Provider</p>
</blockquote>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#feedback-on-near-bounces-from-survey"></a>
Feedback on near-bounces from survey</h4>
<p>We found a few interesting perspectives collected in the Rust Vision doc survey which we administered with examples of bouncing and coming back:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"I started before 1.0, got stuck very soon when trying to translate patterns from C++ to Rust (due to borrow checking). I tried again after 1.0 and it stuck. [..]" -- Survey Respondent A</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Survey Respondent A went on to share in a more detailed response about a perceived weakness in Rust learning materials related to lifetimes and the borrow checker are explained. There was an observation that it's fairly easy to run into more complex situations with lifetimes and the borrow checker. They felt that the current state of this sort of material and tutorials is fairly superficial and can leave learners stuck when they run into those more complex situations.</p>
<p>One respondent that bounced once and came back shared challenges around usage of async. In concert with Rust's memory-safety and the borrow checker, they found some of the nitty-gritty details of async were difficult to learn. While we're aware of the Rust Project's continuous efforts to improve Rust's async story, this is another data point of a user that faced challenges.</p>
<p>Another survey respondent shared how they had multiple times bounced in trying to learn Rust. They returned after a year or so and found Rustlings to be highly motivating. We note that having multiple pathways for folks to learn Rust opens up more possibilities for those that nearly bounced, just like this person.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#need-more-focused-work-on-silent-attritrion"></a>
Need more focused work on silent attritrion</h4>
<p>The thing that stood out most to us was the lack of real, first-hand knowledge of having bounced when learning Rust. While this is an obvious effect of soliciting answers to our survey and opportunities to interview through Rust channels and our networks, this cohort is good future candidate where interviews could start.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#conclusions"></a>
Conclusions</h3>
<p>Across these conversations, the experience of learning Rust depended heavily on context. Why someone was learning and what support they had mattered as much as the borrow checker. The same kinds of examples kept coming up: a training course that got a team to a shared baseline, a maintainer answering a student's first GitHub issue, and a colleague whose code showed that cloning was okay.</p>
<p>That context is largely something the community has a hand in. With that in mind, here is what we take away from what we heard, and what we still don't know.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#what-seems-worth-trying"></a>
What seems worth trying</h4>
<p><strong>Learning materials aimed at unlearning.</strong> Syntax barely came up when people described their struggles. People struggled with unlearning habits from previous languages, whether OOP structuring from C++ and Java or the instinct to grab a raw pointer to a peripheral. Most of our learning materials teach Rust from first principles, and that works. What we didn't come across is much written for, say, the engineer with ten years of Java who lands on a Rust team after a reorg: material that names the patterns they'll reach for that won't transfer, and shows what to do instead. The professor we spoke with did a version of this in the classroom, leaning on "traits are like interfaces in Java" and saving generics for later in the course, and the students did fine. Something similar could work outside the classroom too.</p>
<p><strong>Put the "clone freely while you're learning" advice somewhere official.</strong> Every experienced developer we spoke with gave the same advice, but learners seem to mostly pick it up by accident, like the researcher who happened to see someone else cloning the struct they had been carefully threading lifetimes through. Saying it early in official materials would take some of the steepness out of the curve. The broader version belongs there too: idiomatic Rust doesn't have to mean optimal Rust, especially on a first project.</p>
<p><strong>Diagnostics are already a primary learning resource: several people told us the compiler taught them lifetimes before any documentation did.</strong> Diagnostics reach learners right at the moment they're stuck. When writing new ones, it seems worth keeping the confused newcomer in mind alongside the expert, because for a lot of people this is where the learning happens.</p>
<p><strong>Is "the book" actually out of date?</strong> Whether or not The Rust Programming Language or other materials are actually behind, a team evaluating Rust looked at its repository, saw unresolved issues and unmerged PRs, and moved on. As more companies evaluate adoption, more people will look at these materials with the same fresh eyes. Visible issue triage and some communication about what's current and what's planned would address the perception, separately from whatever content work may or may not be needed.</p>
<p><strong>How stuck learners get treated is shaping who stays.</strong> We heard about students getting answers on GitHub from the maintainers who wrote the code, and we heard about learners being told their struggles were a skill issue. The first group came away with a lasting good impression of Rust. Some of the second group walked away entirely, and because they leave quietly, it's easy to underestimate how many of them there are. The welcoming side of the community came up unprompted as a reason people stayed, so we know it makes a difference when we get this right.</p>
<p><strong>Every organization we spoke with described essentially the same ramp-up for bringing a team to Rust.</strong> Teams that brought groups of developers to Rust described roughly the same approach: get everyone to a shared baseline with a training course or with The Rust Programming Language and Rustlings, start people on lower-risk tickets, and give them somewhere internal to ask questions. Several organizations also found that hiring developers without Rust experience and ramping them up worked out better than continuing to search for rare expertise in another language. None of this is complicated, and teams weighing adoption don't need to invent a training program from scratch.</p>
<h4><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/06/25/vision-doc-journeys-to-learning-rust/#what-we-still-don-t-know"></a>
What we still don't know</h4>
<p>The biggest gap is the people we didn't reach. Nearly everyone we spoke with stuck with Rust long enough to be reachable through Rust channels, so the stories of bouncing off came to us second-hand: a friend who walked away from embedded Rust, colleagues who quietly stopped after the responses they got. As we wrote in <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2025/12/03/lessons-learned-from-the-rust-vision-doc-process/" rel="external">our first post</a>, finding people who decided against Rust takes targeted outreach. If the proposed User Research team comes together, talking with learners who bounced would make a good early project, and learning is probably the area where that research would teach us the most.</p>
<p>We also don't know what to make of LLMs as a learning tool yet. They came up as a search engine, as an example generator, and in one organization's case as something that makes training high school graduates into working Rust developers possible. We saw a classroom where the C cohort leaned on LLMs in ways the Rust cohort couldn't, and we don't have an explanation for it. All of this comes from a handful of conversations, so we treat it as a set of leads to follow up on. Given how quickly the tools are changing, it seems better to study this deliberately than to wait and see what folklore develops.</p>
<p>The folks we spoke with showed that people do get there: with enough passes through the materials and enough code written, it eventually clicks. The opportunities above are mostly about making it work for the people who didn't pick Rust on purpose, and for the ones who would have stuck around if their early experience had gone a little differently.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Rust Programming Language Blog: crates.io: development update]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Another six months have passed since our last development update, and the crates.io team has been busy. Here's a summary of the most notable changes and improvements made to crates.io since then.

Source Code Viewer
Crate pages now have a "Code" tab that lets you browse the contents of published ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693285/tools/the-rust-programming-language-blog-cratesio-development-update/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693285/tools/the-rust-programming-language-blog-cratesio-development-update/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:37:18 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another six months have passed since our <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/01/21/crates-io-development-update/" rel="external">last development update</a>, and the crates.io team has been busy. Here's a summary of the most notable changes and improvements made to <a href="https://crates.io/" rel="external">crates.io</a> since then.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#source-code-viewer"></a>
Source Code Viewer</h3>
<p>Crate pages now have a "Code" tab that lets you browse the contents of published crate versions directly on crates.io. This shows you the exact files that <code>cargo</code> downloads when you add a crate as a dependency, which might differ from the linked repository. This makes it much easier to audit your dependencies, including files that never appear in the repository, like the normalized <code>Cargo.toml</code> files that <code>cargo</code> generates.</p>
<p><img alt='Source code viewer showing the "Code" tab of the serde crate' src="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/code-tab.png"></p>
<p>The viewer comes with a file tree sidebar with search functionality, syntax highlighting, and GitHub-style line selection, where clicking or dragging line numbers produces shareable <code>#L10-L20</code> URLs.</p>
<p>Under the hood, the server now builds a zip file for every published version. Since the <code>.crate</code> files that <code>cargo</code> consumes are gzipped tarballs without random access support, a background job re-packs each of them into a seekable zip archive plus a JSON manifest describing the contained files. Both are served from our static CDN. The frontend then fetches only the manifest and loads each file on demand with an HTTP range request. Because of this architecture, browsing crate sources essentially adds no load on the crates.io API servers. Existing crate versions have been backfilled, so this works for old releases too.</p>
<p>The rendering library behind the code viewer is a diff renderer at heart, and that's no accident: a version-to-version diff viewer built on the same infrastructure is currently in the works. This will allow you to review exactly what changed between two published versions, right on crates.io. Stay tuned!</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#untangling-crates-io-accounts-from-github"></a>
Untangling crates.io Accounts from GitHub</h3>
<p>At the end of May, the crates.io team accepted <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3946" rel="external">RFC #3946</a>. Crates.io accounts always have been tightly coupled to GitHub: signing in means "Log in with GitHub", and your crates.io identity is your GitHub username. The RFC changes that. It introduces usernames that are native to crates.io and independent of linked GitHub accounts, as a prerequisite for eventually supporting login via other identity providers.</p>
<p>The implementation of crates.io usernames has started, but there is still a lot left to do, most visibly the ability to change your crates.io username. After that is complete, there will be future RFCs and implementation for signing in with identity providers other than GitHub. Since all of this touches authentication and account security, we are deliberately taking it slow and rolling these changes out in small, carefully reviewed steps.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#advisories-and-suggestions"></a>
Advisories and Suggestions</h3>
<p>In our <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/01/21/crates-io-development-update/" rel="external">January update</a> we introduced the "Security" tab, which shows security advisories from the <a href="https://rustsec.org/" rel="external">RustSec</a> database. We have since taken this integration one step further: crates that RustSec has flagged as unmaintained now show a warning banner directly on their crate pages, linking to the corresponding advisory for details and possible alternatives. Thanks to <a href="https://github.com/djc" rel="external">Dirkjan Ochtman</a> for implementing this feature!</p>
<p><img alt="Unmaintained warning banner on the ansi_term crate page" src="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/unmaintained-banner.png"></p>
<p>Related to this, some popular crates have been largely absorbed into the Rust standard library over the years, like <code>lazy_static</code>, which has been superseded by <code>std::sync::LazyLock</code> since Rust 1.80. Crate pages of such crates now show a friendly "You might not need this dependency" banner describing the standard library replacement, and superseded crates in dependency lists get a small light bulb icon with a similar hint.</p>
<p><img alt='"You might not need this dependency" banner on the lazy_static crate page' src="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/std-replacement-banner.png"></p>
<p>The dataset behind this feature lives in the new <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/std-replacement-data" rel="external">rust-lang/std-replacement-data</a> repository, together with a documented inclusion policy: standard library replacements only, every entry must cite the stable <code>std</code>, <code>core</code>, or <code>alloc</code> API and Rust version, and crate maintainers get a notice-and-comment window before an entry is added. New entries can be proposed upstream and can benefit other tools too.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#ferris"></a>
Ferris</h3>
<p>The most delightful change of this cycle: the Ferris on our error pages now follows your mouse cursor with its eyes:</p>
<p><img alt="Ferris' eyes following the mouse cursor on the error page" src="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/ferris.gif"></p>
<p>Getting a 404 error on crates.io is now slightly less sad.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#svelte-frontend-migration-completed"></a>
Svelte Frontend Migration Completed</h3>
<p>In our <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/01/21/crates-io-development-update/" rel="external">January update</a>, we announced that we were experimenting with porting the crates.io frontend from Ember.js to <a href="https://svelte.dev/" rel="external">Svelte</a>. This experiment has concluded successfully: the new frontend reached feature parity, went through a <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2026/04/17/crates-io-svelte-public-testing/" rel="external">public testing phase</a> in April, became the default at the beginning of May, and the Ember.js app has been removed from our repository.</p>
<p>We designed this change to be invisible for our users, since the new frontend is a 1:1 port of the previous design and functionality. For the team and our contributors, however, it is a big deal: the frontend is now built on a more modern framework, which should make it easier for new contributors to get started. It also allows us to iterate faster, as the source code viewer above demonstrates.</p>
<p>We want to thank the <a href="https://emberjs.com/teams/" rel="external">Ember.js team</a> for a framework that served crates.io well for many years, and the Svelte team for making the transition so enjoyable.</p>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#miscellaneous"></a>
Miscellaneous</h3>
<p>These were some of the more visible changes to crates.io over the past six months, but a lot has happened "under the hood" as well:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p><strong>Search performance</strong>: Relevance-sorted search queries previously ranked every crate matching the query, which could take 1-2 seconds for short or common search terms. Ranking is now bounded to the 1,000 matching crates with the highest recent download counts.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Reverse dependencies performance</strong>: The reverse dependencies endpoint no longer recomputes the full dependent set on every request. It is now served from a precomputed table kept in sync by database triggers, turning an expensive join into a bounded index scan and greatly reducing the chance of getting a timeout error.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>New ARCHITECTURE.md</strong>: If you've ever wondered how crates.io actually works, our <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io/blob/main/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md" rel="external"><code>ARCHITECTURE.md</code></a> document got a complete rewrite. It is now organized around the high-level systems that make up crates.io and how they fit together, and includes walkthroughs of what happens when you run <code>cargo publish</code>, why a typical crate download never touches our API servers, and how download counts are derived from CDN access logs.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Definition lists</strong>: READMEs now render Markdown <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io/pull/13950" rel="external">definition lists</a>, a widely used Markdown extension. Our markdown renderer <a href="https://crates.io/crates/comrak" rel="external">comrak</a> already supported them, the extension just wasn't enabled yet. Thanks to <a href="https://github.com/mistaste" rel="external">@mistaste</a> for this contribution!</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>CDN cache tags</strong>: Files uploaded to our static CDN now carry cache-tag metadata, allowing us to invalidate all cached files of a crate or a specific release in a single operation, instead of issuing one invalidation per file URL.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Caching improvements</strong>: We removed a global <code>Vary: Cookie</code> response header that was preventing our CDNs from caching public API responses and frontend assets effectively. Per-user responses now use <code>Cache-Control: no-store</code> instead, resulting in better cache hit rates at the CDN edge.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Accessibility</strong>: We have made crates.io friendlier to screen readers: decorative icons are now hidden from the accessibility tree, heading hierarchies have been fixed, and lists are marked up as proper lists. ARIA snapshot tests now ensure that regressions can't slip in unnoticed. We plan to continue to improve crates.io accessibility over the coming months.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Git index performance</strong>: The background worker's local clone of the git index is now a bare and shallow repository, eliminating roughly 250,000 checked-out files and the full commit history from its disk, improving its performance as we see increased rates of crate publication. The periodic index squashing now goes through the GitHub API instead of generating large git packs locally, which had previously caused out-of-memory failures on the production worker.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<h3><a class="anchor" href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/07/13/crates-io-development-update/#feedback"></a>
Feedback</h3>
<p>We hope you enjoyed this update on the development of crates.io. If you have any feedback or questions, please let us know on <a href="https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/318791-t-crates-io" rel="external">Zulip</a> or <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io/discussions" rel="external">GitHub</a>. We are always happy to hear from you and are looking forward to your feedback!</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[DeepSeek Just Solved AI's Billion Dollar Problem]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Two Minute Papers - Bewertung: 10406x - Views:229116 ❤️ Check out Lambda here and sign up for their GPU Cloud: https://lambda.ai/papers

📝 The paper is available here:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21548

🙏 We would like to thank our generous Patreon supporters who make Two Minute Papers pos...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693252/videos/deepseek-just-solved-ais-billion-dollar-problem/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693252/videos/deepseek-just-solved-ais-billion-dollar-problem/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:36:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Two Minute Papers - Bewertung: 10406x - Views:229116 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/mG4SmhWyeFA?autoplay=1&origin=https://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>❤️ Check out Lambda here and sign up for their GPU Cloud: https://lambda.ai/papers<br />
<br />
📝 The paper is available here:<br />
https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21548<br />
<br />
🙏 We would like to thank our generous Patreon supporters who make Two Minute Papers possible:<br />
Adam Bridges, Benji Rabhan, B Shang, Cameron Navor, Charles Ian Norman Venn, Christian Ahlin, Eric T, Fred R, Gordon Child, Juan Benet, Michael Tedder, Owen Skarpness, Richard Sundvall, Ryan Stankye, Shawn Becker, Steef, Taras Bobrovytsky, Tazaur Sagenclaw, Tybie Fitzhugh, Ueli Gallizzi<br />
<br />
#deepseek<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Problem With End-to-End Encryption]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Techquickie - Bewertung: 6635x - Views:137446 Thanks to our sponsor Bitdefender! Try their powerful Scam Protection free for 90 days: https://bitdefend.me/90Linus

Apps like Signal, WhatsApp, and iMessage promise nobody can read your messages. Mostly true - but in 2026, encrypted chat has...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693251/videos/the-problem-with-end-to-end-encryption/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693251/videos/the-problem-with-end-to-end-encryption/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:36:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Techquickie - Bewertung: 6635x - Views:137446 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/qUVsX49fNFw?autoplay=1&origin=https://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Thanks to our sponsor Bitdefender! Try their powerful Scam Protection free for 90 days: https://bitdefend.me/90Linus<br />
<br />
Apps like Signal, WhatsApp, and iMessage promise nobody can read your messages. Mostly true - but in 2026, encrypted chat has three gaps you can&#039;t ignore, and the biggest one might already be sitting on your own computer. We sat down with David Wiseman, BlackBerry&#039;s VP of Secure Communications, to find out what end-to-end encryption actually protects, what it doesn&#039;t, and how attackers are walking around it without breaking a single line of code.<br />
<br />
Leave a reply with your requests for future episodes.<br />
<br />
► SHOP OUR PRODUCTS: https://lttstore.com<br />
► GET A VPN: https://www.piavpn.com/TechQuickie<br />
► GET EXCLUSIVE CONTENT ON FLOATPLANE: https://lmg.gg/lttfloatplane<br />
► SPONSORS, AFFILIATES, AND PARTNERS: https://lmg.gg/partners<br />
<br />
Timestamps:<br />
0:00 How Encrypted Chats Work<br />
1:45 Signal, WhatsApp, iMessage, and Telegram<br />
2:19 Sponsor<br />
2:57 Metadata Still Leaks<br />
4:02 Phishing, Linked Devices, and Recall<br />
5:17 How to Protect Yourself<br />
5:38 Credits<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[China's New Huawei Ascend 950PR Just Destroyed NVIDIA's Future in AI Industry!]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Evolving AI - Bewertung: 179x - Views:7273 Huawei may have just become NVIDIA’s biggest problem in China.

In this video, we break down Huawei’s new Ascend 950PR AI chip, why it matters for the global semiconductor war, and how U.S. export restrictions may have accelerated China’s push to...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693243/videos/chinas-new-huawei-ascend-950pr-just-destroyed-nvidias-future-in-ai-industry/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693243/videos/chinas-new-huawei-ascend-950pr-just-destroyed-nvidias-future-in-ai-industry/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:36:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Evolving AI - Bewertung: 179x - Views:7273 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/sGHhWmeVIqQ?autoplay=1&origin=https://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Huawei may have just become NVIDIA’s biggest problem in China.<br />
<br />
In this video, we break down Huawei’s new Ascend 950PR AI chip, why it matters for the global semiconductor war, and how U.S. export restrictions may have accelerated China’s push toward technological independence. The Ascend 950PR is designed mainly for AI inference and is built by SMIC using advanced DUV multi-patterning. Huawei is also attacking NVIDIA’s biggest advantages beyond hardware by building a CUDA compatibility layer through CANN and scaling thousands of Ascend NPUs together inside the Atlas 950 SuperPod using UnifiedBus interconnect technology. We also look at reported demand from ByteDance, Alibaba Cloud, and Tencent, the role of DeepSeek models optimized for Ascend hardware, and why NVIDIA could lose major market share inside China even without Huawei beating its most advanced chips in every benchmark. This is bigger than one AI chip. China is building a parallel AI ecosystem across chips, software, networking, cloud infrastructure, and AI models — and Huawei is quickly becoming the center of it.<br />
<br />
#Huawei #NVIDIA #AIChips #Ascend950PR #ChinaTech #Semiconductors #ArtificialIntelligence<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ich brauche Windows nicht mehr! Bazzite vs. CachyOS]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: PC-WELT - Bewertung: 1109x - Views:21055 Gaming auf Linux war lange kompliziert oder scheiterte gleich am Game-Support. Doch die Zeiten sind vorbei - dank Distros wie Bazzite oder CachyOS macht Zocken auf Linux mittlerweile richtig Bock. Doch welche Gaming-Distro ist die beste? Was sind d...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693230/videos/ich-brauche-windows-nicht-mehr-bazzite-vs-cachyos/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693230/videos/ich-brauche-windows-nicht-mehr-bazzite-vs-cachyos/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:35:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: PC-WELT - Bewertung: 1109x - Views:21055 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Rh0mNmOtHgs?autoplay=1&origin=https://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Gaming auf Linux war lange kompliziert oder scheiterte gleich am Game-Support. Doch die Zeiten sind vorbei - dank Distros wie Bazzite oder CachyOS macht Zocken auf Linux mittlerweile richtig Bock. Doch welche Gaming-Distro ist die beste? Was sind die Unterschiede zwischen Bazzite und CachyOS? Das hab ich mir mal genauer angeschaut.<br />
<br />
► https://youtu.be/Zz-qL5JRm4s<br />
<br />
► https://youtu.be/j0pM0S3wmbc<br />
<br />
► https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVXONaHZvFU<br />
<br />
► Zum PC-WELT T-Shirt-Shop:<br />
https://pcwelt.myspreadshop.de<br />
<br />
► Unterstützt uns, werdet Kanalmitglied für nur 99 Cent im Monat und erhaltet exklusive Vorteile (jederzeit kündbar):<br />
https://www.youtube.com/pcwelt/join <br />
<br />
► News, Tests und Tipps zum Thema Gaming &amp; eSports: https://www.pcwelt.de/gaming<br />
<br />
► PC-WELT auf Instagram: https://instagram.com/pcwelt/<br />
► PC-WELT auf Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pcwelt/<br />
► PC-WELT auf Twitter: https://twitter.com/pcwelt<br />
<br />
0:00 – Intro: Ist Linux-Gaming 2026 die bessere Wahl?<br />
0:52 – Was ist CachyOS? (Arch Linux &amp; Rolling Releases)<br />
1:29 – Warum CachyOS schneller läuft (CPU-Optimierung &amp; Compiler-Standards)<br />
2:57 – Installation &amp; Dual-Boot im Vergleich<br />
3:38 – Anpassbarkeit: Desktops &amp; Bootloader<br />
3:59 – Systemsicherheit: Die &quot;Atomic Updates&quot; von Bazzite<br />
4:32 – Software-Quellen: CachyOS (Pacman &amp; AUR) vs. Bazzite (Flatpaks)<br />
5:46 – Out-of-the-Box: Wer ist schneller spielbereit?<br />
6:36 – Spiele-Performance &amp; das Nvidia-Treiber-Problem unter Linux<br />
7:01 – Fazit: Welches OS ist besser für dich?<br />
7:39 – Handheld-Gaming (Steam Deck &amp; Co.): Bazzite weiterhin vorn?<br />
8:15 – Outro<br />
<br />
--------<br />
<br />
Unser Equipment (Affiliate-Links):<br />
<br />
🎥Kameras:<br />
https://amzn.to/3WUf0Ud<br />
https://amzn.to/44VCdHC<br />
https://amzn.to/3KdbGMe<br />
<br />
<br />
🔭Objektive:<br />
https://amzn.to/3uLfZ9p<br />
https://amzn.to/2NkGoFd<br />
https://amzn.to/3iXV3GJ<br />
<br />
➡️ Stative:<br />
teuer: https://amzn.to/2DIlCeV<br />
günstig: https://amzn.to/2IHm026<br />
Einbein: https://amzn.to/2T0WbPG<br />
<br />
📺Field Monitore:<br />
Atomos Ninja: https://amzn.to/4dR0q5Y<br />
<br />
🎤Mikros:<br />
Lavalier: https://amzn.to/2IxIlzm<br />
Headset: https://de-de.sennheiser.com/hsp-essential-omni<br />
Shotgun: https://amzn.to/2HdVKIT<br />
<br />
➡️ Kamera-Cages &amp; Zubehör:<br />
SmallRig-Cages: https://amzn.to/4atoPM4<br />
Damit habt Ihr alles im Griff:https://amzn.to/2SmfptN<br />
<br />
➡️ Schulter-Rig: https://amzn.to/3Rm9ZQX<br />
<br />
--------<br />
<br />
Auf dem PC-WELT-Kanal findet Ihr alles rund um das Thema PCs &amp; (Gaming-)Hardware. Bei uns gibt&#039;s alle wichtigen Infos, Tests und Hands-ons rund um die spannendsten Geräte.<br />
<br />
--------<br />
<br />
Einige Links können Affiliate-Links sein. Kauft Ihr über einen solchen Link ein Produkt, erhalten wir eine kleine Provision. Am Kaufpreis ändert sich für Euch dadurch nichts.<br />
<br />
--------<br />
<br />
► Alle News, Hands-ons und Gewinnspiele findet Ihr in dieser Playlist:<br />
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLVC_WMwVwvSjZfr6GlSyy-bNEXm9b-lN3<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Claude Just Revealed AI's Biggest Problem]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Two Minute Papers - Bewertung: 3605x - Views:76846 ❤️ Check out Lambda here and sign up for their GPU Cloud: https://lambda.ai/papers

📝 The paper is available here:
https://www.anthropic.com/research/AI-assistance-coding-skills

🙏 We would like to thank our generous Patreon supporters wh...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693228/videos/claude-just-revealed-ais-biggest-problem/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693228/videos/claude-just-revealed-ais-biggest-problem/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:35:47 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 Videos</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Two Minute Papers - Bewertung: 3605x - Views:76846 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/axOcn--n_lM?autoplay=1&origin=https://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>❤️ Check out Lambda here and sign up for their GPU Cloud: https://lambda.ai/papers<br />
<br />
📝 The paper is available here:<br />
https://www.anthropic.com/research/AI-assistance-coding-skills<br />
<br />
🙏 We would like to thank our generous Patreon supporters who make Two Minute Papers possible:<br />
Adam Bridges, Benji Rabhan, B Shang, Cameron Navor, Charles Ian Norman Venn, Christian Ahlin, Eric T, Fred R, Gordon Child, Juan Benet, Michael Tedder, Owen Skarpness, Richard Sundvall, Ryan Stankye, Shawn Becker, Steef, Taras Bobrovytsky, Tazaur Sagenclaw, Tybie Fitzhugh, Ueli Gallizzi<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Windows 10 Rettungsanker kaputt: ESU-Update schlägt weiterhin fehl]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft untersucht ein Problem, das bei der Installation des jüngsten Windows 10-Updates KB5068781 auftritt. Das Update ist Teil des Extended Security Updates (ESU) Programms und wurde am November Patch-Day veröffentlicht. (Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693196/it-nachrichten/windows-10-rettungsanker-kaputt-esu-update-schlaegt-weiterhin-fehl/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693196/it-nachrichten/windows-10-rettungsanker-kaputt-esu-update-schlaegt-weiterhin-fehl/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:23:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/news,154976.html"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="Update, Windows 10, Fehler, Beta, Bug, Entwicklung, Schadsoftware, Fehlerbehebung, Bugs, Absturz, Crash, Error, Bluescreen, Update Fehler, Windows 10 bugs, Windows 10 Bug, Fehlercode, Windows 10 Fehler, Baustelle, Bauarbeiter, Windows 10 Bluescreen, Vorab, Reperatur" width="128" height="72" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/128/37058.jpg"></a>Microsoft untersucht ein Problem, das bei der Installation des jüngsten <a href="https://winfuture.de/special/windows10/" title="Windows 10 Special">Windows 10-Updates</a> KB5068781 auftritt. Das Update ist Teil des Extended Security Updates (ESU) Programms und wurde am November Patch-Day veröffentlicht. (<a href="https://winfuture.de/news,154976.html">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Windows 10: Microsoft fixt endlich fatalen WinRE-Bug - nach 5 Monaten]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft hat ein wichtiges Update für Windows 10 veröffentlicht, das die defekte Wiederherstellungsumgebung repariert. Das Problem bestand seit Oktober 2025 und verhinderte den Zugriff auf wichtige Rettungsfunktionen. (Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693184/it-nachrichten/windows-10-microsoft-fixt-endlich-fatalen-winre-bug-nach-5-monaten/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693184/it-nachrichten/windows-10-microsoft-fixt-endlich-fatalen-winre-bug-nach-5-monaten/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 08:19:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/news,157330.html"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="Microsoft, Update, Windows Update, Patch Day, Windows 10 Update" width="128" height="72" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/128/35989.png"></a>Microsoft hat ein wichtiges Update für <a href="https://winfuture.de/special/windows10/" title="Windows 10 Special">Windows 10</a> veröffentlicht, das die defekte Wiederherstellungsumgebung repariert. Das Problem bestand seit Oktober 2025 und verhinderte den Zugriff auf wichtige Rettungsfunktionen. (<a href="https://winfuture.de/news,157330.html">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Chasing new skills, going back to basics and pushing for collective action: how software engineers are adapting to AI]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Software engineering was one of the best-paying professions in the US in 2022, but the advent of AI has disrupted it, leading to several layoffs and underemploymentEvery weekday, Matt, a software engineer, looks forward to his four-hour train commute to Pawling, New York. It’s time he uses to wor...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693125/it-nachrichten/chasing-new-skills-going-back-to-basics-and-pushing-for-collective-action-how-software-engineers-are-adapting-to-ai/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693125/it-nachrichten/chasing-new-skills-going-back-to-basics-and-pushing-for-collective-action-how-software-engineers-are-adapting-to-ai/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 07:03:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Software engineering was one of the best-paying professions in the US in 2022, but the advent of AI has disrupted it, leading to several layoffs and underemployment</p><p>Every weekday, Matt, a software engineer, looks forward to his four-hour train commute to Pawling, New York. It’s time he uses to work on his own project: a browser-based video game for which he writes every line of code himself.</p><p>“I am actively trying to keep my axe sharp,” said Matt, who did not want to use his actual name, to protect his employment. In the last six months, Matt’s job has increasingly shifted away from coding, problem solving and software architecture towards reviewing code generated by artificial intelligence. Convinced that the shift will weaken his skills, he’s doing what he can to keep them intact. “I am trying not to leverage AI where I can.”</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ng-interactive/2026/jul/12/software-developers-engineers-ai">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Drei Anbieter, zwei Systeme, kein Überblick: Das ist der bAV-Alltag im Mittelstand]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag Drei Anbieter, zwei Systeme, kein Überblick: Das ist der bAV-Alltag im Mittelstand erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Drei Anbieter, zwei Systeme, ein Ordner voller Altverträge und ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693121/it-nachrichten/drei-anbieter-zwei-systeme-kein-ueberblick-das-ist-der-bav-alltag-im-mittelstand/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693121/it-nachrichten/drei-anbieter-zwei-systeme-kein-ueberblick-das-ist-der-bav-alltag-im-mittelstand/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:59:05 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/23/drei-anbieter-zwei-systeme-kein-ueberblick-das-ist-der-bav-alltag-im-mittelstand/">Drei Anbieter, zwei Systeme, kein Überblick: Das ist der bAV-Alltag im Mittelstand</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Drei Anbieter, zwei Systeme, ein Ordner voller Altverträge und niemand im Unternehmen, der noch weiß, was eigentlich wo gilt. Betriebliche Altersvorsorge im Mittelstand sieht in der Praxis selten so aus wie in der Theorie. Sie ist gewachsen, nicht geplant. Und genau das wird zum Problem, für HR, für den CFO und für jeden Mitarbeitenden, der […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/23/drei-anbieter-zwei-systeme-kein-ueberblick-das-ist-der-bav-alltag-im-mittelstand/">Drei Anbieter, zwei Systeme, kein Überblick: Das ist der bAV-Alltag im Mittelstand</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[7 CRM trends for 2026: AI brings decisive action to customer workflows]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Agentic AI has advanced from the promises-and-pilots phase of 2025 to reality and rollouts in 2026. In the process, agentic AI is transforming virtually every aspect of customer relationship management (CRM), the platform that manages sales, marketing, and customer service.



“Last year, everybo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693117/it-nachrichten/7-crm-trends-for-2026-ai-brings-decisive-action-to-customer-workflows/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693117/it-nachrichten/7-crm-trends-for-2026-ai-brings-decisive-action-to-customer-workflows/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:53:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Agentic AI has advanced from the promises-and-pilots phase of 2025 to reality and rollouts in 2026. In the process, agentic AI is transforming virtually every aspect of <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/272365/what-is-crm-software-for-managing-customer-data.html">customer relationship management (CRM)</a>, the platform that manages sales, marketing, and customer service.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Last year, everybody was dipping their toes into the water,” says <a href="https://futurumgroup.com/keith-kirkpatrick/">Keith Kirkpatrick</a>, research director at The Futurum Group. This year, agentic AI has built momentum from the boardroom down, with companies recognizing that having an AI strategy is imperative. “They feel like if they don’t embrace it now, their competitors will.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.deloitte.com/global/en/about/people/profiles.gx-harry-datwani+f20748dc.html">Harry Datwani</a>, a principal at Deloitte Digital, adds that enterprise CRM customers have transitioned from “proof of concept” to “scale and execution.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Across sales, service, marketing, even in the commerce space, enterprises are really using AI and agentic,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“CRM in 2026 is undergoing a structural shift, not just an incremental evolution,” says Forrester analyst <a href="https://www.forrester.com/analyst-bio/kate-leggett/BIO2629">Kate Leggett</a>, noting that AI is becoming a core part of CRM infrastructure, not just a feature or an add-on. According to Forrester data, around 70% of companies are already using AI in their CRM systems, she says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here are the hot AI-driven trends in CRM this year.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">CRM becomes an action hero</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">CRM platforms have traditionally served as passive, static systems of record. Now, agentic AI is transforming CRM into a powerful, real-time solution that can act autonomously.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Organizations that rethink CRM as a real-time, AI-powered system of action — and embrace agentic AI to handle complex, unpredictable work — are better positioned to deliver exceptional customer experiences,” says IDC analyst <a href="https://my.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=PRF005191">Neil Ward-Dutton</a>. “This approach not only enhances satisfaction and loyalty but also drives operational efficiency and business agility.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Forrester’s Leggett says that AI-powered CRM platforms have advanced from simple data capture to real-time decision-making and execution. Standard capabilities include next-best action recommendations, call summaries, automated updates, generated emails, knowledge creation, predictive forecasting, and deal scoring.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">She adds that AI agents can now execute workflows, such as routing cases, sending follow-ups, and updating records (with human oversight). They can also handle end-to-end service and sales tasks autonomously, including case resolutions and sales development activities.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Agentic drives workforce changes</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI use in CRM systems is also impacting workforce strategies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We used to hire for deep expertise,” says Constellation Research analyst <a href="https://www.constellationr.com/user/liz-miller">Liz Miller</a>. “AI has commoditized expertise because I can take all that data from my CRM and train my AI models to go deep, to know everything about any product I’ve ever sold, from what has worked, what hasn’t, every price, every sale.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now, instead of hiring candidates with deep expertise, organizations are looking for candidates who can go wide. “I can train a model to have deep expertise. What I can’t train for is experience, because experience is what happens when a person has gone broad across a lot of different scenarios and faced complexity across that broad scenario,” says Miller.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For example, AI systems can automate many aspects of marketing, Miller notes, but there’s no substitute for creativity: people who can interrogate the data and come up with innovative marketing campaigns that connect with customers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.servicenow.com/workflow/author/terence-chesire.html">Terence Chesire</a>, group vice president of ServiceNow CRM and industry workflows, says that organizations are using agentic AI to free up team members from repetitive, lower-value activities. Those employees have now moved to higher-level roles “where they’re working on transformational deals rather than just building a spreadsheet.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“That’s what we’re seeing as super-exciting as organizations not just free up people, but the speed and effort reduction and the friction reduction in what they can do,” he adds.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Data layer takes center stage</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI’s promise to deliver actionable customer and marketing intelligence has placed even greater emphasis on the importance on sound data management practices for CRM.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The light bulb has flashed on very brightly for our clients,” says Deloitte’s Datwani. “Everyone is talking about AI agents, but your ability to really extract value is inextricably linked to the quality of your data and the ability to make that data accessible. What we’re finding is that despite large investments over time our clients still have fragmented data. And so, they are data rich and insight poor.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The good news, says Datwani, is that AI agents themselves can <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2140371/gen-ai-can-be-the-answer-to-your-data-problems-but-not-all-of-them.html">help clean up and organize data</a>. And vendors such as <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4030966/snowflake-and-databricks-vie-for-the-heart-of-enterprise-ai.html">Snowflake and Databricks</a>, along with the traditional CRM powerhouses, are offering powerful data analytics solutions. “Everyone is battling for that data layer,” Datwani says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Forrester’s Leggett adds that CRM platforms are converging with <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/308839/top-8-customer-data-platforms.html">customer data platforms (CDPs)</a>, real-time event streams, and external data sources to create connected customer data networks. These real-time, connected data models can help organizations deliver hyper-personalization at scale.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Agentic ushers in pricing complexity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The shift from license- or subscription-based pricing to an <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/3624540/how-will-ai-agents-be-priced-cios-need-to-pay-attention.html">outcome or consumption pricing model</a> has the potential to help CIOs tie their CRM costs to specific business metrics, such as the number of customer service calls resolved per hour. But it has also introduced a <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4184688/it-hurtles-toward-the-great-enterprise-pricing-reset.html">new level of complexity</a> when it comes to budgeting for CRM costs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For example, Chesire says ServiceNow’s CRM pricing plan starts with a baseline subscription model, and on top of that, customers get a certain number of AI tokens per user and can buy additional tokens as AI usage ramps up.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Meanwhile, Salesforce has <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4189183/salesforce-unveils-ai-help-agent-with-pay-per-resolution-pricing.html">rolled out pay-per-resolution pricing</a> with its recently unveiled AI Help Agent and last month <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4183667/salesforce-to-acquire-usage-based-billing-specialist-m3ter.html">acquired usage-based billing specialist m3ter</a>. Oracle is also <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4184271/oracle-wades-into-outcome-based-ai-billing-waters.html">piloting outcome-based AI pricing</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">All these approaches undercut the predictability of the subscription model, which will complicate CIOs’ cost calculus, Deloitte’s Datwani says. “Now, as you start to think about consumption and tokens, costs might look different. As folks are opening up the architecture with things like headless CRM, what will the cost model look like for API calls or MCP server calls? So, there’s many more variables,” he adds.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The rise of multi-agent orchestration</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To act autonomously, agents need to access multiple data sets and software platforms seamlessly. As a result, the proliferation of agents, some embedded within specific vendor platforms and some created in-house, is going to require an orchestration layer, Futurum’s Kirkpatrick says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">He points out that organizations need to monitor and manage agents, enforcing the same type of policy-based access control that exists for people. Organizations also need to set limits on what domains a specific agent can get into, what types of data they can access, what lines can’t they cross.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Kirkpatrick predicts that a <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4138739/21-agent-orchestration-tools-for-managing-your-ai-fleet.html">new class of orchestration tools</a> will emerge, although it’s not clear whether that orchestration layer will be provided by the leading CRM vendors, hyperscalers, or third parties.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Datwani agrees. “The orchestration layer is an interesting area, where the traditional vendors are in on it, the hyperscalers are also offering it, and there are third parties. It’s my belief that there’s not going to be a clear winner.”<em></em></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The interface becomes conversational</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprise users who have traditionally had to manually wrangle with CRM systems are likely to find the ability to employ voice commands using a natural language interface to be a game changer. For starters, a salesperson can say, “I have a meeting today with Customer X. Help me prepare.” The agent will collect relevant data, ingest it, and provide a summary with recommendations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">ServiceNow’s Chesire says voice-enabled CRM systems have an “almost magical” ability to record, transcribe, and understand the content of a call between a salesperson and a customer or potential customer. The system can then “build a quote” based on that conversation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the customer service side of the equation, AI-driven voice technology enables customers to speak to an AI agent, describe the problem using natural language, and get a response. The agent has the capability to, for example, solve a credit card dispute, order a replacement product, send out a service rep, or do whatever is needed to resolve the issue, says Chesire.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beyond that, agentic technology is capable of understanding the underlying business process flaws that led to the product snafu, and make recommendations for ways to fix whatever led to the issue in the first place, he adds.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Agentic drives business process transformation</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With the emergence of outcome-based pricing, organizations are taking a fresh look at how they measure the benefits of CRM systems. That conversation is leading to an even more important analysis of underlying business processes. Or, as Constellation’s Miller says, “The old adage of applying new technology to old processes only gets you more expensive old processes.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“When we survey customers, we hear time and time again that the reason why they want to apply AI into their organizations is to foster exponential opportunity and exponential growth,” she says. “How do we get there with CRM has started to become the new conversation.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to Miller, AI systems breach the walls of siloed data and can take a fresh look at legacy workflows. They also don’t get sucked into turf wars between marketing and sales teams. As a result, they often recommend new actions that can lead to better processes. “I think it’s starting to happen. You’re starting to see applications where AI is beginning to accelerate decision-making and decision velocity,” she says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The next phase of maturity is going to be, how do we start to spread AI across our platforms so that we are seeing that holistic end-to-end relationship that we have always wanted to optimize. How do we thread that across platforms and across solutions. We’re starting to see organizations on the leading edge really start to pull those strategies together,” says Miller.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How to use themes in Google Messages so you never text the wrong person again]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[You've probably had an occasion where you've sent the wrong response to the wrong person. I've found a way to avoid this problem.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693111/it-nachrichten/how-to-use-themes-in-google-messages-so-you-never-text-the-wrong-person-again/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693111/it-nachrichten/how-to-use-themes-in-google-messages-so-you-never-text-the-wrong-person-again/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:45:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You've probably had an occasion where you've sent the wrong response to the wrong person. I've found a way to avoid this problem.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Customers prefer AI chatbots, says British Gas owner as 1,300 call centre and back office jobs axed]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[CEO Chris O’Shea defends Centrica’s plans as it reports rise in retail profits following focus on bigger marginsThe owner of British Gas has claimed that most households would rather speak with an AI chatbot than deal with the company’s staff as it prepares to cut 1,300 jobs from its call centres...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693103/it-nachrichten/customers-prefer-ai-chatbots-says-british-gas-owner-as-1300-call-centre-and-back-office-jobs-axed/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693103/it-nachrichten/customers-prefer-ai-chatbots-says-british-gas-owner-as-1300-call-centre-and-back-office-jobs-axed/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:38:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CEO Chris O’Shea defends Centrica’s plans as it reports rise in retail profits following focus on bigger margins</p><p>The owner of British Gas has claimed that most households would rather speak with an AI chatbot than deal with the company’s staff as it prepares to cut 1,300 jobs from its call centres and back office.</p><p>Centrica, the supplier’s FTSE 100 owner, plans to cut 800 jobs as the company carries out a “targeted deployment of AI tools”, on top of the 500 cuts it confirmed last month.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jul/23/customers-prefer-ai-chatbots-says-chris-oshea-british-gas-centrica-boss">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[So erklärst du deinen Mitarbeitenden die bAV – ohne dass HR jede Frage selbst beantworten muss]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag So erklärst du deinen Mitarbeitenden die bAV – ohne dass HR jede Frage selbst beantworten muss erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Die betriebliche Altersvorsorge gehört zu den wertv...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693089/it-nachrichten/so-erklaerst-du-deinen-mitarbeitenden-die-bav-ohne-dass-hr-jede-frage-selbst-beantworten-muss/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693089/it-nachrichten/so-erklaerst-du-deinen-mitarbeitenden-die-bav-ohne-dass-hr-jede-frage-selbst-beantworten-muss/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:23:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/so-erklaerst-du-deinen-mitarbeitenden-die-bav/">So erklärst du deinen Mitarbeitenden die bAV – ohne dass HR jede Frage selbst beantworten muss</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Die betriebliche Altersvorsorge gehört zu den wertvollsten Benefits, die ein Arbeitgeber anbieten kann und gleichzeitig zu den am schlechtesten kommunizierten. Viele HR-Teams kennen das Problem: Die bAV ist eingeführt, der Vertrag mit dem Versicherer steht, die Versorgungsordnung liegt im Ordner. Aber die Mitarbeitenden? Die fragen immer noch, was das eigentlich bedeutet, ob sie mitmachen sollen […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/so-erklaerst-du-deinen-mitarbeitenden-die-bav/">So erklärst du deinen Mitarbeitenden die bAV – ohne dass HR jede Frage selbst beantworten muss</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[3 cybersecurity issues that should keep every CEO awake at night]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For years, I have been saying that cybersecurity is no longer a technology problem. It has become a business leadership challenge.



Yet, despite record levels of spending, ever-growing security teams, increasingly sophisticated technologies and a constant stream of new regulations, organization...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693088/it-nachrichten/3-cybersecurity-issues-that-should-keep-every-ceo-awake-at-night/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693088/it-nachrichten/3-cybersecurity-issues-that-should-keep-every-ceo-awake-at-night/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:16:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For years, I have been saying that cybersecurity is no longer a technology problem. It has become a business leadership challenge.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Yet, despite record levels of spending, ever-growing security teams, increasingly sophisticated technologies and a constant stream of new regulations, organizations continue to suffer major cyber incidents with alarming regularity. Every week seems to bring news of another ransomware attack, supply chain compromise or data breach affecting organizations that many would have assumed were well protected.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The obvious conclusion is that we are asking the wrong questions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Too many executive teams remain preoccupied with the latest threat actor, the newest security product the CISO wants to buy or the latest vulnerability making headlines. Those issues matter, but they are not what should be keeping CEOs awake at night.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In my view, there are three far more fundamental issues that deserve the attention of every chief executive.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">1. Corporate complexity, and the widening gap between business leadership and cybersecurity reality</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Perhaps the biggest cybersecurity risk facing large organizations today is not technical at all.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is the growing disconnect between executive perception and operational reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many boards genuinely believe their organizations are reasonably well protected. They receive regular dashboards showing improving maturity scores, increasing compliance levels, falling vulnerability counts and reassuring traffic-light reports.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unfortunately, cyber attackers do not read dashboards.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Behind those executive reports often lies an increasingly complex technology landscape, thousands of unmanaged digital assets, ageing infrastructure, rampant shadow IT, fragmented ownership, inconsistent governance and security teams struggling to keep pace with relentless business change.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The problem is rarely a lack of effort.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is that corporate complexity has reached a level where traditional governance mechanisms are no longer capable of providing an accurate picture of organizational resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Executives believe they understand the level of cyber risk they face because they receive regular reports. Those reports often measure activity rather than resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Governance committees end up debating around another percentage point of phishing awareness or vulnerability remediation, while fundamental issues remain unaddressed in the background.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">2. Organizational inertia, and the need for executive structure to evolve faster</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cyber criminals continue to evolve rapidly. Large organizations generally do not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the second issue that should concern every CEO.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Throughout my career, I have observed organizations repeatedly responding to new cyber threats by adding another technology platform, another monitoring capability, another compliance framework or another governance committee.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Very rarely do they stop to redesign how cybersecurity operates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The result is what I described several years ago as the “<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Cybersecurity-Spiral-Failure-How-Break/dp/1637353057/">Cybersecurity Spiral of Failure</a>”.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>As complexity and regulation increase, organizations invest in more security products.</li>



<li>More products create more complexity.</li>



<li>More products and greater complexity generate more alerts.</li>



<li>More alerts require more analysts.</li>



<li>More analysts produce more reports.</li>



<li>More reports continue to build up executive confidence.</li>



<li>Meanwhile, the underlying structural weaknesses remain largely unchanged, technical debt piles up and costs escalate.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And when the inevitable breach eventually happens, reality reveals itself, but distrust also sets in between senior executives and security teams.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is not a funding problem. Nor is it a skills problem. It is fundamentally an operating model problem.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many organizations continue trying to solve twenty-first century challenges using governance, accountability, organizational and reporting structures designed twenty-five years ago.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The cybersecurity function itself has evolved dramatically. Many executive structures have not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This organizational inertia extends beyond technology: It affects budgeting cycles, <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4193990/reallocating-cybersecurity-capital-in-the-mythos-era.html">investment priorities</a>, procurement processes, accountability models and decision-making speed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cyber attackers innovate every day. Organizational change often takes years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That imbalance should worry every CEO.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">3. Accelerating technological disruption, and how it challenges organizations in areas where they are intrinsically weak</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The third issue is potentially the most significant over the coming decade.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Artificial intelligence, autonomous agents and machine identities</li>



<li>Software supply chain complexity.</li>



<li>Quantum computing, and post-quantum cryptography</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each of these developments represents far more than another technical trend.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Together, they fundamentally change the dynamics of cybersecurity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Artificial intelligence is transforming countless business processes. At the same time, it is also increasing both the speed and sophistication of cyber-attacks while simultaneously transforming defensive capabilities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Organizations have become increasingly dependent on software ecosystems that extend far beyond their own direct control. Engaging with the supply chain in ways that lead to a genuine appreciation of the risks involved has become a key challenge for most cybersecurity practices.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Quantum computing may eventually invalidate much of today’s cryptographic algorithms, forcing organizations into one of the largest technology efforts since Y2K — but without the benefit of a fixed deadline and faced by a problem that is considerably more complex and hyperconnected IT estates that have little to do with those of the late 90s.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of these challenges can be solved overnight: They require clear governance, sustained investment over a few years and cross-functional organizational coordination.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most large organizations are weak on those three fronts: This is precisely why CEOs should be focusing on them now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Waiting until some of those risks become obvious will almost certainly be too late.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Businesses naturally prioritise immediate commercial pressures. Cybersecurity often involves preparing for risks whose timing remains uncertain.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But one of the greatest leadership failures I keep seeing remains the inability of organizations to act decisively on known unknowns.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That tension explains why many organizations delay action until external events force them to respond. Unfortunately, cybersecurity rarely rewards late action.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Leadership will determine who succeeds</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cybersecurity discussions still frequently focus on technology. I believe they should focus far more on leadership.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Technology will continue evolving. Threat actors will continue adapting. Regulations will continue expanding. Those developments are inevitable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What remains within the control of every CEO is how their organization responds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Does cybersecurity remain an IT issue? Or is it recognised as an integral part of business resilience?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">How is cybersecurity accountability assigned at executive level? Or does it still rest largely with a CISO hidden in the organization?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Does the board spend sufficient time discussing resilience? Or does cybersecurity appear only when approving budgets or reviewing incidents?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These questions will increasingly determine organizational success.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The companies that navigate the next decade successfully will not necessarily be those spending the most on cybersecurity. Nor will they be those deploying the latest security technologies first.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They will be the organizations whose leadership recognises that cybersecurity has become a permanent business capability — embedded into governance, strategy, operational decision-making and organizational culture.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That transformation cannot be delegated. It begins with the CEO.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And perhaps that is the single biggest issue that should keep every chief executive awake at night: Not when the next cyber-attack will happen, but whether their organization is evolving quickly enough on those matters to meet a threat landscape that is changing much faster than the business itself.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What is a business analyst? A key role for business-IT efficiency]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What is a business analyst?



Business analysts (BAs) are responsible for bridging the gap between IT and the business using data analytics to assess processes, determine requirements, and deliver data-driven recommendations and reports to executives and stakeholders.



BAs engage with business...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693087/it-nachrichten/what-is-a-business-analyst-a-key-role-for-business-it-efficiency/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693087/it-nachrichten/what-is-a-business-analyst-a-key-role-for-business-it-efficiency/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:16:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What is a business analyst?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Business analysts (BAs) are responsible for bridging the gap between IT and the business using <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/191313/what-is-data-analytics-analyzing-and-managing-data-for-decisions.html">data analytics</a> to assess processes, determine requirements, and deliver data-driven recommendations and reports to executives and stakeholders.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">BAs engage with business leaders and users to understand how data-driven changes to process, products, services, software, and hardware can improve efficiencies and add value. They must articulate those ideas but also balance them against what’s technologically feasible and financially and functionally reasonable. Depending on the role, a business analyst might work with data sets to improve products, hardware, tools, software, services, or process.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The International Institute of Business Analysis (IIBA), a nonprofit professional association, considers the business analyst an agent of change, and says that <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/191157/what-is-business-analytics-using-data-to-predict-business-outcomes.html">business analysis</a> is a disciplined approach to introduce and manage change to organizations, whether they’re for-profit businesses, governments, or nonprofits.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Impact of AI on business analyst role</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As AI becomes commonplace in the tech industry, business analysts are embracing it as a tool to automate repetitive work in the role. AI tools can be used for workflow and diagramming, process mapping, data analysis, and to automate meeting minutes and transcribe meetings where requirements are established, all designed to speed up the process of analyzing data, creating visuals, and transcribing and writing user stories and acceptance criteria.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI tools can also help identify patterns, insights, and unique data points that might go unnoticed by humans, and allow a faster time to generate insights for organizations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Of course, as with all AI tools, they still require humans to oversee prompts, scripting, and evaluate AI outputs to ensure they’re accurate and valid. While they can’t replace the work of BAs, AI can help them spend more time on thoughtful analysis and decision making, rather than mundane tasks such as gathering and summarizing data, and querying.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst job description</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">BAs are responsible for creating new models that support business decisions by working closely with finance and IT teams to establish initiatives and strategies aimed at improving revenue and optimizing costs. They need a strong understanding of regulatory and reporting requirements, and have plenty of experience in forecasting, budgeting, and financial analysis combined with knowing KPIs, according to Robert Half Technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to Robert Half, a BA’s job description typically includes budgeting and forecasting, planning and monitoring, variance analysis, pricing, reporting, and creating a detailed business analysis in an effort to outline problems, opportunities, and solutions for a business. It also says BAs should be able to define business requirements and report them back to stakeholders.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Since BAs are tasked with prioritizing technical and functional requirements, identifying what clients want, and determining what’s feasible to deliver, the role requires a deep understanding of systems, how they function, who’ll need to be involved, and the necessary steps to get everyone on board.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The role is constantly evolving, especially as companies rely more on data to advise business operations. Every company has different issues that a business analyst can address, whether it’s dealing with outdated legacy systems, changing technologies, broken processes, poor client or customer satisfaction, or large, siloed organizations.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst skills</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The BA position requires both hard and soft skills, as they need to know how to pull, analyze, and report data trends, share that information with others, and apply it to business goals and needs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not all BAs need a background in IT if they have a general understanding of how systems, products, and tools work. Alternatively, some have strong IT backgrounds and less experience in business, but are interested in shifting away from IT into this hybrid role, which often acts as a communicator between the business and IT sides of the organization. So having extensive experience in either area can be beneficial for BAs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.iiba.org/career-resources/new-to-business-analysis/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">According to the IIBA</a>, some of the most important skills and experience for a business analyst are:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Oral and written communication skills</li>



<li>Interpersonal, organizational, facilitation, and consultative skills</li>



<li>Analytical thinking and problem solving</li>



<li>Being detail-oriented and able to deliver a high level of accuracy</li>



<li>Knowledge of business structure</li>



<li>Stakeholder and cost-benefit analysis</li>



<li>Processes modeling</li>



<li>Understanding networks, databases, and other technologies</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For a more in-depth look at what it takes to succeed as a business analyst, click <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/189108/essential-traits-of-elite-business-analysts.html">here</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst salary</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The average annual salary for an IT business analyst is $80,692, according to <a href="https://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Business_Analyst%2C_IT/Salary" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">data from PayScale</a>. The highest paid BAs are in New York, where the average salary is 14% higher than the national average. Dallas, Texas, is second, with reported salaries 6.4% higher than the national average, closely followed by Washington, D.C., where salaries are 6.3% higher than the national average.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Some skills are in higher demand than others, with the potential to boost salary. According to Payscale, these are associated with higher BA salaries. These skills, and the amount they can boost your salary, include:</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><div class="overflow-table-wrapper"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td>Skills</td><td>Salary Boost</td></tr><tr><td>ScrumMaster</td><td>44%</td></tr><tr><td>Microsoft Azure</td><td>30%</td></tr><tr><td>Supply Chain</td><td>27%</td></tr><tr><td>Oracle eBusiness Suite</td><td>25%</td></tr><tr><td>Master Data Management (SAP MDM)</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>SAP Sales and Distribution (SAP SD)</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>Product Support</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>Microsoft Dynamics GP</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>SAP Quality Management (SAP QM)</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>Workday Software</td><td>15%</td></tr></tbody></table> </div></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For tips on boosting your salary, click <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/189510/7-steps-business-analysts-can-take-to-earn-more.html">here</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst certifications</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Although business analysis is a relatively new discipline in IT, a handful of organizations already offer certifications to help boost your résumé and prove your merit as an analyst. Organizations such as the IIBA, IQBBA, IREB, and PMI each offer their own tailored certifications for business analysis. These include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>IIBA <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/189169/ecba-certification-an-entry-level-credential-for-business-analysts.html">Entry Certificate in Business Analysis (ECBA)</a></li>



<li>IIBA Certification of Competency in Business Analysis (CCBA)</li>



<li>IIBA Certified Business Analysis Professional (CBAP)</li>



<li>IIBA Agile Analysis Certification (AAC)</li>



<li>IQBBA Certified Foundation Level Business Analyst (CFLBA)</li>



<li>IREB Certified Professional for Requirements Engineering (CPRE)</li>



<li>PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PBA)</li>



<li>Certified Analytics Professional (CAP)</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For more information about how to earn one of these certifications — and how much they cost — click <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/228834/6-business-analyst-certifications-to-advance-your-analytics-career.html">here</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analytics tools and software</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">BAs typically rely on software such as Microsoft’s Excel, PowerPoint, and Access, as well as SQL, Google Analytics, and Tableau. These tools help BAs collect and sort data, create graphs, write documents, and design visualizations to explain findings. You won’t necessarily need programming or database skills for a BA position, but if you already have these skills, they won’t hurt. The type of software and tools you’ll need to use, however, will depend on your job title and what the organization requires.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CIOs beware: DNS KSK rollover could kick off wave of mysterious outages]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Predicting an outage is tricky business, but CIOs might want to circle Oct. 11, 2026, through Jan. 11, 2027, for likely trouble of a potentially widespread and puzzling nature.



That’s because a relatively trivial update to DNSSEC on Oct. 11, one that will take full effect by Jan. 11, is likely...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693085/it-nachrichten/cios-beware-dns-ksk-rollover-could-kick-off-wave-of-mysterious-outages/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693085/it-nachrichten/cios-beware-dns-ksk-rollover-could-kick-off-wave-of-mysterious-outages/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:16:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Predicting an outage is tricky business, but CIOs might want to circle Oct. 11, 2026, through Jan. 11, 2027, for likely trouble of a potentially widespread and puzzling nature.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s because a relatively trivial update to DNSSEC on Oct. 11, one that will take full effect by Jan. 11, is likely to deliver a series of seemingly unrelated system outages. This will come from oceans of dependencies from third-party, shadow, agentic, gen AI, SaaS, homegrown, and legacy apps — among many other quiet executable hiding spots, including virtual environments and containers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/joshithak/">Sai Joshitha Kathari</a>, senior site reliability engineer at payment card giant Visa, says most enterprises have far more DNS-related exposure than they realize because of these many dependencies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This has the potential to create real downstream destruction when unresolved failures sit underneath important business functions,” Kathari says. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The danger is that so many of these issues are either unknown to IT or handled by a third-party vendor and no one in IT has had reason to ask those vendors about DNS updates. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The risky areas are usually not the obvious managed DNS services. They are the older internal applications, hardcoded resolvers, containerized workloads, sidecar configurations, custom scripts, partner integrations, VM images, stale base images, and service-to-service dependencies that nobody has touched in a long time,” Kathari explains. “These systems can keep working quietly for years, then fail during a DNS or certificate-related change because they bypassed the normal platform standards.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Independent technology analyst <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/carmi/">Carmi Levy</a> says that CIOs need to take this event very seriously. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The two-pronged deadline — October 11, 2026, when the new Key Signing Key (KSK) begins signing the root zone, and January 11, 2027, when the old key is retired — should be marked in red on everyone’s calendar, just as December 31, 1999, once was,” Levy says. “Failure to comply could result in websites, critical business applications, and related resources dropping off the face of the Earth once the transition is complete.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Levy adds: “Custom-built code that lives outside conventional support mechanisms may or may not function when the DNS changes go into effect.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://www.icann.org/resources/press-material/release-2026-05-20-en">DNSSEC update itself</a> is straightforward, but it is also the first significant DNSSEC change — specifically a change in the trust anchor — since 2018. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The rollout statement noted that “the trust anchor is formally known as the Domain Name System Security Extensions (DNSSEC) root zone Key Signing Key (KSK). The KSK is the cryptographic key at the core of the DNSSEC trust anchor and is used to verify that DNS responses are legitimate and have not been modified in transit.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Expect nearly every enterprise to be impacted</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/kimdavies/">Kim Davies</a>, vice president of IANA Services and president of public technical identifiers at ICANN, says the extent of the impact on enterprises is unknowable, given the nature of shadow IT and other edge cases. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But based on the massive number of dependencies both known and unknown in the typical global enterprise, Davies guesses that just about every enterprise will be impacted, to varying degrees. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“In highly complex organizations, it is very likely there will be some impact in the corners, in the margins, of the organization,” Davies tells CIO. “DNS is such a core technology that underpins everything.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As the updates propagate, hiccups will materialize, Davies notes. “When the system cannot validate the [DNS] information, it will treat it as suspect and DNS lookups will fail.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Visa’s Kathari says, “Enterprises should expect some secondary DNS-related glitches when major DNSSEC-related changes happen, not necessarily because the core infrastructure teams will ignore the update, but because large environments have many hidden dependency paths.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Making this problem far worse, Kathari notes, is that the glitches will likely initially look like anything other thana DNS glitch. That will force IT staff to waste a vast number of hours chasing causes that ultimately prove to be unrelated to the incidents. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The impact for CIOs is that DNS failures rarely announce themselves as DNS failures. They look like application timeouts, broken logins, failed API calls, queue lag, payment failures, partner connectivity issues, or random regional instability,” Kathari explains. “That makes troubleshooting slower because teams may spend hours looking at the application, database, network, or cloud provider before realizing name resolution is part of the failure path.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://greyhoundresearch.com/svg/">Sanchit Vir Gogia</a>, chief analyst at Greyhound Research, agrees that IT will likely spin its wheels chasing the wrong ghosts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“A validation failure rarely stays in its lane. It surfaces as an application error, an API timeout, or a reachability problem, which turns a resolver fault into a coordination failure,” Gogia says. “The application team blames the network, the network team blames the cloud, and the user simply watches work stop.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Images and templates are the frontier most teams miss,” Gogia adds. “A resolver fixed in summer can be broken again in October the instant a stale golden image is redeployed, because automation no longer lets configuration drift slowly. It restores yesterday’s assumptions at machine speed.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is widely expected that enterprises will not have any problems executing the change or, more likely, relying on their hyperscalers to properly handle the change. That is the concern. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“CIOs are being distracted so much with AI and this is such a deep in the weeds infrastructure issue that this can and willcatch people off-guard,” <a href="https://acceligence.com/talent/profiles/justin-greis/">Justin Greis</a>, CEO of consulting firm Acceligence, tells CIO. “I think we’ll see a meaningful number of enterprise disruptions associated with the DNSSEC trust anchor rollover. Not because the update itself is especially difficult, but because it will expose weaknesses that already exist inside many organizations.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most enterprise IT operations have had no reason to compile a comprehensive list of all DNS dependencies, but many will be instantly discovered in January. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Potentially widespread fallout</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A major retailer, for example, might suddenly be unable to connect with FedEx to arrange for deliveries or a hospital may find that test results are no longer being shared with patient portals. It might manifest as an assembly line that halts because an IIoT component can no longer share files with its vendor system or a truck fleet that stops being tracked. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“There will almost certainly be systems that fall through the cracks. Some will be legacy applications that rely on outdated DNS configurations that have not been updated in years,” Greis says. “Others will be business-unit-developed tools, contractor-built solutions, embedded systems, manufacturing and industrial systems, or highly customized workloads that operate outside normal IT oversight. These are the types of systems that often surface during infrastructure events like this.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Greis adds that many enterprises will discover in January problems created by their own automation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Over time, enterprises build layers of processes, templates, and deployment mechanisms that are reused across teams and environments,” Greis notes. “Even after DNS infrastructure is updated correctly, older settings can inadvertently be reintroduced through routine updates and system changes, creating intermittent and difficult-to-diagnose failures.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The good news from this situation is that enterprises are not going to likely lose all DNS access if any of these glitches occur. But that may be of no comfort because even if the disruptions are only with small edge cases, that can still cause massive operational disruptions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/cricketliu/">Cricket Liu</a>, EVP and chief evangelist at Infoblox, gives the example of a DNS server that responds to factory-floor system queries.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Or let’s say this disrupts [an enterprise’s key] SaaS application. All name resolution may stop and it will show a server failure. It will not deliver a response whenever I look anything up. That’s not subtle at all,” Liu says. “It’s highly likely that companies are going to see some effects.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Back in 2017, the switchover was relatively uneventful, giving some CIOs hope that January 2027 will also be a non-event. But given the technology advancements in the last 10 years and the resulting tidal wave of new enterprise tech dependencies, few are realistically expecting no problems this go around. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Impossible to predict what will happen</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the top network experts on DNS effects in enterprises is <a href="https://blog.apnic.net/author/geoff-huston/">Geoff Huston</a>, chief scientist at the Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC), the regional Internet Registry administering IP addresses for the Asia Pacific region.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Huston says it is difficult to project what will happen in January until it happens.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Just like the last time, we are flying blind with this key roll. Because nothing really terrible happened last time, there is some confidence that nothing terrible will happen this time, but we just can’t tell in advance as there are no good measurement approaches that allow us to peek inside the trust state of recursive resolvers,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As for potential edge-case glitches, Huston says it is possible, but if third-party vendors do not properly handle the update, there will be other issues as well, as the KSK cryptographic key used within DNSSEC signs and validates the keys that protect DNS records. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“If it is not standards-compliant, then you have more problems than just the KSK roll,” Huston says, “as it raises the obvious question of ‘What else is not correctly implemented in the DNS resolver that I’m running?’”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a silver lining, Acceligence’s Greis says any hiccups that result from the DNS KSK update may be a gift in disguise for CIOs. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The irony is that some of the most business-critical components in the technology stack are often the least visible because they work in the background,” Greis says. January “may reveal how much modern business resilience depends on infrastructure that many organizations rarely examine until something breaks. For CIOs, that’s the real lesson. This is not fundamentally a story about a DNS update. It is a story about operational visibility, resilience, and governance. Organizations that treat the rollover as a routine infrastructure task will likely complete the update and move on. Organizations that use it as an opportunity to understand and strengthen the foundations of their technology environment may gain far more value than simply avoiding an outage.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Atos launches sovereign cloud service to power comeback]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Atos has launched a new sovereign cloud platform aimed squarely at European public sector bodies, healthcare providers and defense organizations. It’s the latest effort by European companies in their fight back against US dominance.



Atos Sovereign Cloud offers a range of controls for data mana...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693082/it-nachrichten/atos-launches-sovereign-cloud-service-to-power-comeback/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693082/it-nachrichten/atos-launches-sovereign-cloud-service-to-power-comeback/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:13:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Atos has launched a new sovereign cloud platform aimed squarely at European public sector bodies, healthcare providers and defense organizations. It’s the latest effort by European companies in their fight back against US dominance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Atos Sovereign Cloud offers a range of controls for data management, providing customers with resilience and full control over their data, complying with existing European legislation on data residency.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Digital sovereignty has become a global operational priority for organizations that need to manage dependencies, jurisdictional exposure and disruption risks across complex digital environments. Atos Sovereign Cloud gives customers a practical way to apply sovereign controls to their most critical workloads, while preserving flexibility, resilience and the ability to innovate securely,” said Michael Kollar, Atos Group digital sovereignty leader.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There has been a concerted effort by <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4121422/europe-votes-to-tackle-deep-dependence-on-us-tech-in-sovereignty-drive.html">European organizations to meet US competition</a> head-on. Earlier this month, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4192767/cloud-sovereignty-first-four-providers-sign-up-to-cispe-certification-program.html">four companies signed up to the certification program</a> introduced by the European cloud body, CISPE,</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the latest effort by Atos to get the company back on track. In April, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4154186/french-government-take-bull-by-horns-for-e404-million.html">it sold its supercomputer company, Bull</a> to the French government, after a previous attempt in 2024 to <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/1310376/atos-deal-to-sell-its-legacy-service-business-falls-through.html">sell off its computer services division</a> and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2086965/atos-staves-off-bankruptcy-casts-wider-net-for-refinancing.html">after a refinancing deal</a> in the same year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company implemented a further round of refinancing this year and <a href="https://www.atosgroup.com/en/press/first-phase-refinancing-strategy-completed" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">in its half-yearly report</a> claimed that this was an “important milestone” in securing the company’s future. However, in its first-quarter results revenue showed an organic decline of 11 percent, so any projected growth may be some time in the future. Whether its Sovereign Cloud offering is the harbinger of the revival remains to be seen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[250 Eiffel Towers' worth of waste: The AI boom's toxic hardware problem]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Chips, servers, cables, and more could compound an already massive problem - here's who it affects and what's being done about it.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693079/it-nachrichten/250-eiffel-towers-worth-of-waste-the-ai-booms-toxic-hardware-problem/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693079/it-nachrichten/250-eiffel-towers-worth-of-waste-the-ai-booms-toxic-hardware-problem/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 06:11:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Chips, servers, cables, and more could compound an already massive problem - here's who it affects and what's being done about it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Für Laptop, Handy & Co.: Kompaktes Multiport-Ladegerät von Anker jetzt günstig bei Amazon]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Zum simultanen Aufladen von Smartphone, Tablet und Laptop werden üblicherweise mehrere Ladegeräte und Steckdosen benötigt. Das momentan preiswert bei Amazon erhältliche Ladegerät Anker Nano II löst dieses Problem durch die Kombination von drei Anschlüssen innerhalb eines kompakten Geräts.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3693069/it-nachrichten/fuer-laptop-handy-co-kompaktes-multiport-ladegeraet-von-anker-jetzt-guenstig-bei-amazon/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3693069/it-nachrichten/fuer-laptop-handy-co-kompaktes-multiport-ladegeraet-von-anker-jetzt-guenstig-bei-amazon/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 05:54:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Zum simultanen Aufladen von Smartphone, Tablet und Laptop werden üblicherweise mehrere Ladegeräte und Steckdosen benötigt. Das momentan preiswert bei Amazon erhältliche Ladegerät Anker Nano II löst dieses Problem durch die Kombination von drei Anschlüssen innerhalb eines kompakten Geräts.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Aktuelle Technik-Blitzangebote von Amazon im Überblick 25. Juli]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Täglich bieten Amazon und andere Händler zahlreiche Produkte für eine begrenzte Zeit preisgesenkt an. Wir haben uns die heutigen Technik-Angebote angeschaut und ziehen den Vergleich zum Straßenpreis. Ob es sich also wirklich um ein Schnäppchen handelt, erfahrt ihr hier.			(Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692745/it-security-nachrichten/aktuelle-technik-blitzangebote-von-amazon-im-ueberblick-25-juli/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692745/it-security-nachrichten/aktuelle-technik-blitzangebote-von-amazon-im-ueberblick-25-juli/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 01:37:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/amazon/angebote/#1784934180"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="Amazon, Schnäppchen, Rabattaktion, Deals, sale, Angebote, Sonderangebote, Angebot, shopping, Rabatt, Flash, Deal, Blitzangebote, Blitz, Nachlass, Amazon Logo, Amazon.de" width="1920" height="1080" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/1920/42128.jpg"></a>
			Täglich bieten Amazon und andere Händler zahlreiche Produkte für eine begrenzte Zeit preisgesenkt an. Wir haben uns die heutigen Technik-Angebote angeschaut und ziehen den Vergleich zum Straßenpreis. Ob es sich also wirklich um ein Schnäppchen handelt, erfahrt ihr hier.			(<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/amazon/angebote/#1784934180">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Paramount Agrees to Postpone Warner Bros. Merger Until June 2027]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Paramount Skydance has agreed to postpone its $111 billion Warner Bros. Discovery merger until five days after an antitrust trial or June 1, 2027, whichever comes first. The agreement with a 12-state coalition led by California effectively shelves the deal for months while states argue it would r...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692726/it-security-nachrichten/paramount-agrees-to-postpone-warner-bros-merger-until-june-2027/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692726/it-security-nachrichten/paramount-agrees-to-postpone-warner-bros-merger-until-june-2027/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 01:07:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Paramount Skydance has agreed to postpone its $111 billion Warner Bros. Discovery merger until five days after an antitrust trial or June 1, 2027, whichever comes first. The agreement with a 12-state coalition led by California effectively shelves the deal for months while states argue it would reduce competition in cable and theatrical markets. Variety reports: Paramount had been keen to close the deal before Sept. 30, when it will begin to incur a $7-million-a-day "ticking fee" to be paid to Warner Bros. investors. The agreement is a tacit acknowledgement that that will not happen, barring a settlement with the states. Paramount previously sought a three-day hearing on the injunction motion in late August, hoping to win the judge's blessing to close the deal sometime in early September. But the states resisted that idea, saying they would need more time to take discovery and prepare for a full trial on the merits. The states were due to file their injunction motion on Thursday night, but held off as the two sides held discussions on a path forward. In a statement, the company said the agreement is a "significant win."
 
"Today's agreement is a significant win because the result is exactly what we have sought from the outset: a direct path to a trial based on the evidence," a Paramount spokesperson said. "This is the fastest and clearest way to prove that this transaction is good for competition, good for consumers, and good for creators, a conclusion dozens of competition authorities around the world have already reached. Plaintiffs' market definitions bear no relationship to the realities of today's marketplace and cannot withstand scrutiny. We look forward to proving our case at trial."
 
A hearing was scheduled for Aug. 3 in federal court in Oakland, at which point the two sides were expected to argue over the injunction motion. The two sides agreed to cancel that hearing. U.S. District Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin approved the joint stipulation on Friday afternoon, about an hour after it was entered. The Writers Guild of America filed its own motion for an injunction earlier this week, which was also set to be heard on Aug. 3. That motion has been withdrawn, as Paramount has effectively conceded that it will not close the deal until a determination of the merits of the antitrust claims. The parties also agreed to submit a joint stipulation by July 31 on their respective positions on trial scheduling. The states previously proposed to hold the trial in April 2027.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Paramount+Agrees+to+Postpone+Warner+Bros.+Merger+Until+June+2027%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fyro.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F24%2F2235232%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fyro.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F24%2F2235232%2Fparamount-agrees-to-postpone-warner-bros-merger-until-june-2027%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://yro.slashdot.org/story/26/07/24/2235232/paramount-agrees-to-postpone-warner-bros-merger-until-june-2027?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Would an AI Kill Switch Backfire?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Security Weekly - A CRA Resource - Bewertung: 0x - Views:1 Some policymakers have proposed mechanisms that could disable or restrict advanced AI systems under certain circumstances. Supporters view these as safeguards against dangerous behavior, while critics argue they could introduce ne...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692645/it-security-video/would-an-ai-kill-switch-backfire/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692645/it-security-video/would-an-ai-kill-switch-backfire/</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 00:03:21 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Security Weekly - A CRA Resource - Bewertung: 0x - Views:1 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/4HJD39GiThA?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Some policymakers have proposed mechanisms that could disable or restrict advanced AI systems under certain circumstances. Supporters view these as safeguards against dangerous behavior, while critics argue they could introduce new security, governance, and trust concerns.<br />
<br />
If users believe an AI system can be disabled whenever authorities decide it's "rogue," confidence in that platform may decline. Organizations and individuals could migrate to alternatives they perceive as more independent, even if those systems introduce different risks.<br />
<br />
Is an AI kill switch a necessary safety measure, or does it create a larger trust problem than it solves?<br />
<br />
Subscribe to our podcasts: https://securityweekly.com/subscribe<br />
<br />
#AISafety #SecurityWeekly #Cybersecurity #InformationSecurity #AI #InfoSec<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[So verschärft KI das Problem von Kinderfotos im Netz | SwissCybersecurity.net]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[... Juli 2026. Main Navigation Cybersecurity. News · Wissen · Security-Blog · Specials · IT-Markt. Schlüsselwörter. Webcode. News. Sharenting. So ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692641/it-security-nachrichten/so-verschaerft-ki-das-problem-von-kinderfotos-im-netz-swisscybersecuritynet/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692641/it-security-nachrichten/so-verschaerft-ki-das-problem-von-kinderfotos-im-netz-swisscybersecuritynet/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 23:54:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[... Juli 2026. Main Navigation Cybersecurity. News · Wissen · <b>Security</b>-Blog · Specials · <b>IT</b>-Markt. Schlüsselwörter. Webcode. News. Sharenting. So ...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Oracle awarded 10-year $7 billion Pentagon deal to supply Department of War with vital software and services]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The contract unifies existing Oracle licensing under a single vehicle, and is expected to save $441 million across the 10-year period.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692606/it-nachrichten/oracle-awarded-10-year-7-billion-pentagon-deal-to-supply-department-of-war-with-vital-software-and-services/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692606/it-nachrichten/oracle-awarded-10-year-7-billion-pentagon-deal-to-supply-department-of-war-with-vital-software-and-services/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 23:33:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The contract unifies existing Oracle licensing under a single vehicle, and is expected to save $441 million across the 10-year period.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Paramount agrees to delay Warner Bros. merger into 2027]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The extended pause will give time to hear cases for blocking the deal from states and the WGA.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692513/it-nachrichten/paramount-agrees-to-delay-warner-bros-merger-into-2027/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692513/it-nachrichten/paramount-agrees-to-delay-warner-bros-merger-into-2027/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 23:05:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The extended pause will give time to hear cases for blocking the deal from states and the WGA.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[VentureBeat Research: Where enterprise AI agent governance hasn't caught up]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Enterprises deployed AI agents ahead of the controls needed to manage them — and they did it knowingly. That is the central finding across the five parallel surveys VentureBeat Research fielded in June, spanning every layer of the agentic stack. Now those enterprises are retrofitting to catch up ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692498/it-nachrichten/venturebeat-research-where-enterprise-ai-agent-governance-hasnt-caught-up/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692498/it-nachrichten/venturebeat-research-where-enterprise-ai-agent-governance-hasnt-caught-up/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 22:51:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enterprises deployed AI agents ahead of the controls needed to manage them — and they did it knowingly. That is the central finding across the five parallel surveys VentureBeat Research fielded in June, spanning every layer of the agentic stack. Now those enterprises are retrofitting to catch up with their own standards, and they are budgeting for it: In each of the five control layers we measured, 57 to 68% of enterprises plan to switch vendors or add new ones within 12 months, and roughly a third, depending on the layer, plan to move within the quarter.</p><p><a href="https://venturebeat.com/category/resources">VentureBeat Research</a> measured the five controls an enterprise has to build before it can trust an agent: identity, evaluation, cost telemetry, the context layer, and orchestration. Identity governs which agent is allowed to do what, under whose credentials. Evaluation determines whether the agent's work is any good. Cost telemetry tracks what each agent costs to run. The context layer supplies the business data and definitions agents draw on when they answer. And the orchestration control plane coordinates multi-step agent work. Each of our five reports measures one of those controls.</p><p><b>Most deployed "agents" are chatbots wearing the label.</b> Seventy-one percent of enterprises said a quarter or fewer of their deployed "agents" can complete multi-step work on their own; only 10% said true agents are the majority of what they run. These respondents are positioned to know: 81% recommend or decide AI purchases at their companies. A single-prompt chatbot with a human reading every answer needs none of the controls the other four reports measure. A true multi-step agent needs all of them — and most enterprises can't say which one they've deployed. <i>(Full findings: </i><a href="https://venturebeat.com/resources/agentic-orchestration-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-deployment-problem-not-a-platform-problem-and-most-are-calling-chatbots-agents"><i>Agentic Orchestration report.</i></a><i>)</i></p><p><b>Autonomy is outrunning trust in the evaluations that gate it.</b> Two-thirds of enterprises either already allow an agent to push a code or system change to production on automated evaluation results alone, with no human review, or are actively engineering toward that within 12 months. Only 5% fully trust the evaluations that would make that call — and half of enterprises shipped an agent that passed internal evaluations and then caused a customer-facing failure in the past year. Before removing human review from any workflow, test evaluations against production outcomes rather than internal benchmarks. <i>(Full findings: </i><a href="https://venturebeat.com/resources/the-agent-evaluation-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-reality-alignment-problem-not-a-coverage-problem-and-most-are-shipping-to-production-anyway"><i>Agent Reliability &amp; Evals report</i></a><i>.)</i></p><p><b>Companies that let agents share credentials get hit more often.</b> Sixty-nine percent of companies let at least some of their agents share credentials — multiple agents operating under one API key or service account. Organizations that allow credential sharing anywhere experienced a security incident or near-miss at a 63.5% rate (47 of 74), against 40.9% (nine of 22) at companies where every agent has its own scoped identity. The fix is scoped identity for every agent, starting with the ones that touch production systems. <i>(Full findings: </i><a href="https://venturebeat.com/resources/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials"><i>Agentic Security &amp; Identity report</i></a><i>.)</i></p><p><b>The most expensive hardware in the building runs at half capacity or less.</b> More than eight in 10 enterprises that run their own GPUs reported utilization of 50% or less, and only 44% rigorously track what their AI compute actually costs and returns. The number worth chasing first isn't more GPUs — it's the utilization and per-workload cost of the ones already running. <i>(Full findings: </i><a href="https://venturebeat.com/resources/the-ai-compute-gap-enterprises-are-buying-infrastructure-faster-than-they-can-measure-what-it-costs"><i>AI Infrastructure &amp; Compute report</i></a><i>.)</i></p><p><b>Agents answer confidently from data nobody governs.</b> Fifty-seven percent of enterprises traced a confident, wrong agent answer in the past six months to their own missing or inconsistent business context — wrong metrics, stale definitions, absent documents — and most saw it happen more than once. Governing the definitions agents answer from — metrics and entities first — has to come before scaling the agents that depend on them. <i>(Full findings: </i><a href="https://venturebeat.com/resources/the-ai-context-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-trust-problem-not-a-retrieval-problem-and-most-are-still-building-the-fix"><i>Context Layers / RAG report</i></a><i>.)</i></p><p>No layer has an entrenched incumbent: The defaults today are the built-in tools that ship with the big AI platforms enterprises already use. Switching intent runs highest in orchestration itself, where 68% plan to adopt, add, or replace platforms within 12 months and 34% within the quarter. Our surveys did not ask which direction that money moves — toward the platforms' built-in tools or toward the specialists challenging them — and that open question is the next four quarters of this market.</p><hr><p><b>About this research</b> </p><p><a href="https://venturebeat.com/category/resources">VentureBeat Research</a> fielded five parallel surveys in June 2026 under its VB Pulse program: Agentic Orchestration (101 respondents), Agent Reliability &amp; Evals (157), Agentic Security &amp; Identity (107), AI Infrastructure &amp; Compute (107), and Context Layers / RAG (101) — 573 qualified respondents in total, all at organizations with 100 or more employees. Samples are self-selected, and some findings should be read directionally; each report carries its full methodology note. What the pattern supports more strongly than any single percentage is the direction: every survey, independently, points the same way. VentureBeat produces both this research and <a href="https://venturebeat.com/vbtransform2026">VB Transform</a>, the conference where these reports debuted.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[‘Sugar’ Season 2, Episode 6 Recap: John Sugar Faces His Darkest Choice Yet]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Sugar Season 2, Episode 6 pushes John Sugar deeper into a dangerous conspiracy as Vega closes in on Ji Moon and refuses to leave any witnesses behind.




Episode title: “Cautionary Tale”



Release date: July 24, 2026



Genre: Crime drama, mystery, neo-noir and science fiction



Season length:...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692419/ios-mac-os/sugar-season-2-episode-6-recap-john-sugar-faces-his-darkest-choice-yet/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692419/ios-mac-os/sugar-season-2-episode-6-recap-john-sugar-faces-his-darkest-choice-yet/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 21:47:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sugar Season 2, Episode 6 pushes John Sugar deeper into a dangerous conspiracy as Vega closes in on Ji Moon and refuses to leave any witnesses behind.




Episode title: “Cautionary Tale”



Release date: July 24, 2026



Genre: Crime drama, mystery, neo-noir and science fiction



Season length: Eight episodes



Season finale: August 7, 2026




Spoiler warning



The following section contains major spoilers from Sugar Season 2, Episode 6.



Sugar learns the truth about Operation Fire Sale



After hiding Ji Moon in a rehabilitation facility and arranging a fake death certificate, Sugar continues investigating the operation connected to Vega. He discovers that the conspiracy, known as Operation Fire Sale, extends far beyond the local drug trade.



The people behind the scheme plan to flood selected neighborhoods with cheap fentanyl. Once overdose deaths increase, someone inside the city alters the official records, allowing the victims to disappear from government systems. The group can then exploit housing grants and properties connected to those missing residents.



Sugar finally has evidence linking Vega to the operation. However, possessing the evidence does not immediately solve his problem because Vega remains determined to find Ji and silence him permanently.



Who is Peg Rosenthal?



The episode opens with a flashback from 11 years earlier, revealing the identity of the woman who has appeared in Sugar’s visions throughout the season.



Her name was Peg Rosenthal, another member of Sugar’s species who became deeply attached to human life. She enjoyed human food, relationships and money before becoming involved in financial crimes.



Sugar was ordered to collect Peg and send her home. During their journey, she warned him that becoming human was a slippery slope. Peg believed her actions had changed her so much that her people would never accept her again.



When Sugar briefly leaves to buy tissues, Peg covers herself and the vehicle in gasoline before taking her own life. Her death explains Sugar’s fear that his growing connection to humanity will eventually destroy him as well.



Sugar cannot bring himself to kill Vega



Sugar enters Vega’s apartment with a gun and appears ready to end the threat. However, he stops himself before pulling the trigger.



His hesitation becomes even more dangerous when Vega meets him later at the hotel bar. Sugar explains that Ji will remain silent, but Vega refuses to take the risk. He makes it clear that Ji cannot stay alive.



Sugar tells Vega that he had an opportunity to kill him earlier. Vega responds that Sugar should have taken it, leaving the two men heading toward an unavoidable confrontation.



Meanwhile, Sugar and Charlotte become closer, showing how quickly he continues to embrace human emotions and desires. With Ji still in hiding and Vega preparing his next move, Sugar has placed himself in too deep with nowhere safe left to go.



What do you think Sugar will do when Vega finally finds Ji? Let us know in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Rakuten TV: Neue FAST-Channels mit Sony Pictures gestartet]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Rakuten TV baut sein kostenloses, werbefinanziertes Streaming-Angebot (FAST) massiv aus. Durch einen frischen Deal mit Sony Pictures Entertainment (SPE) bringt die Plattform ab sofort europaweit 20...Zum Beitrag: Rakuten TV: Neue FAST-Channels mit Sony Pictures gestartet

Wo du uns folgen kannst:...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692402/it-nachrichten/rakuten-tv-neue-fast-channels-mit-sony-pictures-gestartet/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692402/it-nachrichten/rakuten-tv-neue-fast-channels-mit-sony-pictures-gestartet/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 21:34:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Rakuten TV baut sein kostenloses, werbefinanziertes Streaming-Angebot (FAST) massiv aus. Durch einen frischen Deal mit Sony Pictures Entertainment (SPE) bringt die Plattform ab sofort europaweit 20...<p>Zum Beitrag: <a href="https://stadt-bremerhaven.de/rakuten-tv-neue-fast-channels-mit-sony-pictures-gestartet/">Rakuten TV: Neue FAST-Channels mit Sony Pictures gestartet</a>
</p><p>
Wo du uns folgen kannst:
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/CaschysBlog">Facebook</a>, <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/CaschysBlog/">Reddit</a>, <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMQgKIitDQklTR2dnTWFoWUtGSE4wWVdSMExXSnlaVzFsY21oaGRtVnVMbVJsS0FBUAE?ceid=DE:de&amp;oc=3">Google News</a>, <a href="https://x.com/CaschysBlog">X</a>, <a href="https://www.threads.com/@caschysblog">Threads</a>
<br>
</p><div>
    <strong>Auf dem Laufenden bleiben?</strong>
    <br>
    <a href="https://www.google.com/preferences/source?q=stadt-bremerhaven.de">Fügt uns doch bei Google als bevorzugte Quelle hinzu!</a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Anthropic claims its new Claude Opus 5 delivers near-Fable 5 performance at half the token price]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Anthropic's new flagship model Claude Opus 5 posts top scores in coding and knowledge work at half of Fable 5's token rates. On ARC-AGI-3, a benchmark for novel problem-solving, Opus 5 hits 30.2 percent, nearly four times higher than GPT-5.6 Sol.
The article Anthropic claims its new Claude Opus 5...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692319/ai-nachrichten/anthropic-claims-its-new-claude-opus-5-delivers-near-fable-5-performance-at-half-the-token-price/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692319/ai-nachrichten/anthropic-claims-its-new-claude-opus-5-delivers-near-fable-5-performance-at-half-the-token-price/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 20:51:31 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="2560" height="1440" src="https://the-decoder.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/claude_opus_5_logo-scaled.webp" class="attachment-full size-full wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high"></p>
<p>        Anthropic's new flagship model Claude Opus 5 posts top scores in coding and knowledge work at half of Fable 5's token rates. On ARC-AGI-3, a benchmark for novel problem-solving, Opus 5 hits 30.2 percent, nearly four times higher than GPT-5.6 Sol.</p>
<p>The article <a href="https://the-decoder.com/anthropic-claims-its-new-claude-opus-5-delivers-near-fable-5-performance-at-half-the-token-price/">Anthropic claims its new Claude Opus 5 delivers near-Fable 5 performance at half the token price</a> appeared first on <a href="https://the-decoder.com/">The Decoder</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[‘Lucky’ Season 1 Episode 3 Recap: Lucky Finally Tracks Down Cary]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[“Lucky” Season 1, Episode 3 follows Lucky as she searches for Cary and the stolen money, using every trick she learned during her unusual childhood. The episode, titled “Read the Room,” also reveals that Agent Billie Rand’s pursuit of Priscilla has become deeply personal.



“Lucky” is a seven-ep...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692287/ios-mac-os/lucky-season-1-episode-3-recap-lucky-finally-tracks-down-cary/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692287/ios-mac-os/lucky-season-1-episode-3-recap-lucky-finally-tracks-down-cary/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 20:27:30 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[“Lucky” Season 1, Episode 3 follows Lucky as she searches for Cary and the stolen money, using every trick she learned during her unusual childhood. The episode, titled “Read the Room,” also reveals that Agent Billie Rand’s pursuit of Priscilla has become deeply personal.



“Lucky” is a seven-episode Apple TV limited series based on Marissa Stapley’s novel. The first two episodes arrived on July 15, followed by weekly releases through August 19.




Episode title: Read the Room



Release date: July 22, 2026



Runtime: 45 minutes




Spoiler warning for “Lucky” Episode 3



After the failed multimillion-dollar robbery, Lucky remains separated from Cary, who disappeared with their money. She also continues running from Priscilla’s people and the FBI while relying on the criminal skills taught to her by her father, John.



Episode 3 begins with a flashback showing John completing a deal for Priscilla as Agent Rand watches nearby. Lucky warns John that the situation will end badly. In the present, Rand follows Lucky’s trail through gas-station security footage, although she remains several steps behind her.



Lucky reaches Priscilla’s farm and hides while Dutch questions Noah about fake identification documents. Dutch eventually kills him, allowing Lucky to steal Noah’s identification and search for the person making the fake documents.



Lucky crashes a child’s birthday party



Before continuing her search, Lucky enters a child’s birthday party to obtain clothes, money and transportation. A flashback shows John teaching young Lucky how to steal at such events, including taking cash envelopes and unattended purses.



Lucky leaves the party with a new outfit, enough money to tip a valet and someone else’s car. The scene shows how easily she can enter an unfamiliar environment, gain people’s trust and disappear before anyone notices what happened.



At Noah’s home, Lucky discovers that his neighbour creates fake IDs. While studying her previous work, Lucky finds evidence that Cary used her services and adopted the name Colson Smith.



Lucky finally finds Cary



Lucky manipulates a real-estate agent into giving her access to the property where Cary is staying. While Cary swims nearby, she searches the house and discovers a gun and a laptop protected by a 12-word seed phrase.



Cary returns to find the property destroyed and Lucky waiting inside. Meanwhile, Wayne tells Priscilla that he has also discovered Cary’s location, placing both Cary and Lucky in immediate danger.



Episode 3 ends with the former partners finally reunited, although their missing money and broken trust remain unresolved. What do you think Cary will tell Lucky, and will they work together against Priscilla? Let us know in the comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Skip the Standalone Nintendo Switch 2, the Bundle Is a Better Deal. Here’s Why]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Pick your game, pocket the savings and walk away with more than just a console.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692248/it-nachrichten/skip-the-standalone-nintendo-switch-2-the-bundle-is-a-better-deal-heres-why/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692248/it-nachrichten/skip-the-standalone-nintendo-switch-2-the-bundle-is-a-better-deal-heres-why/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 20:10:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Pick your game, pocket the savings and walk away with more than just a console.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Anthropic launches Claude Opus 5, a cheaper AI model for coding, agents and enterprise workflows]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Anthropic released Claude Opus 5 on Friday, a model the company says delivers nearly all the intelligence of its top-of-the-line Claude Fable 5 at half the cost — a launch that signals how the AI race is shifting from raw capability to the economics of daily use.The model, available immediately o...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692246/it-nachrichten/anthropic-launches-claude-opus-5-a-cheaper-ai-model-for-coding-agents-and-enterprise-workflows/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692246/it-nachrichten/anthropic-launches-claude-opus-5-a-cheaper-ai-model-for-coding-agents-and-enterprise-workflows/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 20:10:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.anthropic.com/">Anthropic</a> released Claude <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> on Friday, a model the company says delivers nearly all the intelligence of its top-of-the-line Claude <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Fable 5</a> at half the cost — a launch that signals how the AI race is shifting from raw capability to the economics of daily use.</p><p>The model, available immediately on all of Anthropic's platforms, is priced at $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output tokens, unchanged from its predecessor, <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-8">Opus 4.8</a>. It becomes the new default model on <a href="https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11049741-what-is-the-max-plan">Claude Max</a>, Anthropic's premium consumer tier, and the strongest model available on <a href="https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8325606-what-is-the-pro-plan">Claude Pro</a>.</p><p>The positioning is deliberate. Anthropic is not claiming <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5 </a>is its smartest model — that distinction still belongs to <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Fable 5</a>, and rival systems retain an edge in certain domains. Instead, the company is making a subtler argument that may matter more to enterprise buyers: that the most economically important AI work happens in a middle band of difficulty, where near-frontier intelligence delivered efficiently and cheaply beats frontier intelligence delivered expensively.</p><p>"Opus 5 as your daily driver, the model you hand complex work to and review when it's done," an Anthropic spokesperson said in an interview with VentureBeat, describing how the company's lineup now stratifies. "Fable 5 for your most ambitious work, the days-long autonomous projects nothing could take on before... Sonnet 5 for work you run at scale, where speed and cost per call decide what ships. Haiku 4.5 for subagents and instant answers."</p><h2><b>How Claude Opus 5 benchmark results stack up against Fable 5 and rival AI models</b></h2><p>On paper, the results are striking. Anthropic says <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> sets new state-of-the-art marks on coding and knowledge-work evaluations including <a href="https://www.frontierbench.ai/announcement">Frontier-Bench</a> and <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/gdpval-aa">GDPval-AA</a>. On <a href="https://www.frontierbench.ai/announcement">Frontier-Bench v0.1</a>, an agentic terminal coding benchmark, Opus 5 scores 43.3 percent — more than double Opus 4.8's 18.7 percent and well ahead of Fable 5's 33.7 percent — at a lower cost per task, according to the company. On <a href="https://arcprize.org/arc-agi/3">ARC-AGI 3</a>, an evaluation of novel problem-solving, Anthropic reports Opus 5 scored three times as high as the next best model. On <a href="https://github.com/xlang-ai/OSWorld-V2">OSWorld 2.0</a>, a computer-use benchmark, the company says the model surpasses Fable 5's best result at just over a third of the cost.</p><p>The numbers come with honest caveats that are themselves notable in an industry prone to superlatives. Anthropic acknowledges <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> remains behind <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/mythos">Mythos 5</a>, a competing model, on cybersecurity tasks and biology research, and an OpenAI-family model still leads on one agentic coding benchmark.</p><p>The more revealing caveat came from Anthropic itself, when asked where <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> still falls short of <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Fable 5</a>. The spokesperson's answer amounted to a candid admission about what benchmarks do and don't capture.</p><p>"The evals where Opus 5 wins are bounded tasks with a specific outcome, which is where it's strongest. What those evals don't measure is duration," the spokesperson told VentureBeat. "One way to put it: Opus 5 is the best tool for the jobs benchmarks can see, and Fable 5 is what you reach for when the job outruns the benchmark."</p><p><a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Fable 5</a>, by contrast, "is for the longest, most autonomous jobs, where the model has to stay coherent across many connected steps over hours or days with dense source material," the spokesperson said, advising customers to "run both on a representative workload, one bounded task and one long-horizon job." That framing — bounded tasks versus long-horizon autonomy — may become the defining axis of model differentiation in 2026, as benchmarks saturate and the hardest remaining problems involve sustained, multi-day agentic work rather than discrete puzzles.</p><h2><b>Why token efficiency is becoming the real battleground for enterprise AI spending</b></h2><p>Threaded through the launch is a theme Anthropic clearly wants buyers to absorb: <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> doesn't just score well, it scores well per dollar. The model ships with an adjustable "effort" setting that lets customers trade intelligence for speed and token savings, and Anthropic's charts emphasize performance at a given cost rather than peak performance alone.</p><p>Early customers echoed the point with unusual specificity. Harvey, the legal AI company, said Opus 5 achieved similar performance to Opus 4.8's maximum-reasoning mode "while generating 26% fewer tokens on average," according to Niko Grupen, its head of applied research. Richard Pham of Fundamental Research Lab said that on hard financial-modeling tasks, the model averaged nine percentage points higher accuracy "while using roughly one-third fewer turns and tool calls and 60% less time."</p><p>Wade Foster, chief executive of Zapier, said Opus 5 topped his company's AutomationBench leaderboard "without spending more tokens than prior Claude models," running a full churn-prevention workflow from start to finish. "Previous models didn't pass; Opus 5 hit 100%," he said. Scott Wu, chief executive of Cognition, the company behind the Devin coding agent, said that on FrontierCode 1.1, "Claude Opus 5 approaches Fable-level performance at half the cost," with particular strength in debugging and root-cause analysis.</p><p>The efficiency emphasis reflects commercial reality. Enterprise AI spending is no longer experimental, and inference costs — the price of actually running these models at scale — have become a board-level line item. </p><p>Anthropic's business skews heavily toward API and enterprise usage; according to a February 2026 analysis by <a href="https://research.contrary.com/company/anthropic">Contrary Research</a>, Claude held roughly 40 percent of the enterprise large language model market by usage as of late 2025, and Claude Code alone had reached about $1 billion in annualized revenue. For a company whose customers pay by the token, a model that does more with fewer tokens is not a nice-to-have. It is the product.</p><h2><b>Self-verifying AI agents and what they mean for the hidden costs of automation</b></h2><p>Beyond the numbers, Anthropic is selling a behavioral story: that <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> verifies its work and iterates until it succeeds. The company offered several examples from testing that read like small parables of machine stubbornness.</p><p>In one <a href="https://www.frontierbench.ai/announcement">Frontier-Bench</a> task, the model was asked to reconstruct a machine part as a 3D CAD model from a drawing it was intentionally given no way to view. Rather than fail, Anthropic says, Opus 5 wrote its own computer vision pipeline to extract the geometry from raw pixels — and did so repeatedly, while no competing model solved the task in five attempts. In another case, given a real bug in a popular open-source package manager, the model found the root cause and fixed an edge case the community's own patch had missed; a competing model patched only the symptom and declared victory. An engineer at a trading firm, the company says, used Opus 5 to build a market data feed for a new exchange in a single session and, finding no live feed to validate against, watched the model build its own test harness to check its parsing code.</p><p>Customers described similar behavior in the wild. Cristian Rivera, a staff software engineer at Stripe, said he gave the model "a chief-of-staff role over my dev environments" for a weekend: "it built its own monitor, drove each box, and pulled me in only for the judgment calls."</p><p>This is the capability enterprises actually care about, and it is worth dwelling on why. The gap between a model that produces plausible output and one that verifies its output is the gap between a demo and a deployable system. Most of the hidden cost of enterprise AI today is human review — engineers checking the machine's work. A model that reliably checks its own work compresses that cost, which is precisely why customers keep citing fewer turns, fewer passes, and less time rather than higher raw scores.</p><h2><b>Inside Anthropic's safety strategy: capability gaps, classifiers, and model fallbacks</b></h2><p>The launch also showcases Anthropic's increasingly intricate approach to safety — one that now involves deliberately not teaching its models certain skills. The company says its automated behavioral audit found Opus 5 to be its most aligned model to date, scoring 2.3 on overall misaligned behavior, lower than <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-8">Opus 4.8</a>, <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-sonnet-5">Sonnet 5</a>, or <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable">Fable 5</a>, with the lowest rates of deceptive behavior and the least susceptibility to being tricked into misuse.</p><p>On the capability side, Anthropic says it intentionally avoided training <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5</a> on cyber tasks, as it did with Opus 4.8. The model improved on them anyway — a side effect of general capability gains — and now nearly matches Mythos 5 at finding software vulnerabilities. But it remains far behind at exploiting them: on Anthropic's OSS-Fuzz evaluation, Opus 5 identified vulnerabilities at a 79.4 percent rate, close to Mythos 5's 80 percent, but succeeded at developing exploits in only 4 challenges versus Mythos 5's 13. That asymmetry — strong at defense-relevant discovery, weak at offense-relevant exploitation — appears to be by design, and the safeguards follow the same logic. Anthropic expects Opus 5's cyber classifiers to intervene about 85 percent less often than Fable 5's.</p><p>When a classifier does trigger, requests in <a href="http://claude.ai/">Claude.ai</a>, <a href="https://code.claude.com/docs/en/overview">Claude Code</a>, and <a href="https://claude.com/product/cowork">Claude Cowork</a> fall back to <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-8">Opus 4.8</a> by default — raising an obvious question: if a request is too risky for one model, why is it acceptable for another? "The model it falls back to has lower capability levels making the risk of harmful use lower as well," the spokesperson said, adding that "there is a message that lets the user know when this occurs and is visible in the chat."</p><p>The logic is defensible, but it reveals how AI safety actually works in 2026: risk is not a property of the question alone, but of the question multiplied by the capability of the system answering it. On biology, the calculus runs the other way. Opus 5 is now Anthropic's most capable generally available model for scientific research — scoring 10.2 percentage points higher than Opus 4.8 on the company's internal chemistry benchmark — though the spokesperson acknowledged that "Mythos 5 remains the stronger model for long-horizon, open-ended work like autonomous drug design campaigns."</p><h2><b>The business stakes behind the launch: a $380 billion valuation and massive compute bets</b></h2><p>The launch lands at a moment of extraordinary commercial momentum — and extraordinary obligations — for Anthropic. Reuters reported in February that the company was valued at <a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/anthropic-valued-380-billion-latest-funding-round-2026-02-12/">roughly $380 billion</a> in its latest funding round, following a period in which, per Contrary Research's analysis, its annualized revenue climbed from about $1 billion at the end of 2024 to a projected $9 billion by the end of 2025, with internal targets reportedly <a href="https://research.contrary.com/company/anthropic">reaching $20 to $26 billion for 2026</a>. Those targets are underwritten by enormous infrastructure commitments, including a <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/news/microsoft-nvidia-anthropic-announce-strategic-partnerships">reported $30 billion Azure compute deal</a> alongside arrangements with Google Cloud and Nvidia — spending that only pencils out if enterprises keep expanding usage.</p><p>That is the context in which Opus 5's pricing strategy makes sense. Holding the price at Opus 4.8 levels while roughly doubling performance on key agentic benchmarks is effectively a steep price cut per unit of capability, designed to widen the funnel of workloads that are economical to automate. Every task that was marginal at Opus 4.8's cost-per-success becomes viable at Opus 5's — and every viable task is recurring token revenue.</p><p>The regulatory backdrop has grown more complex as well. A U.S. judge gave final approval this week to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/us-judge-approves-anthropics-15-billion-settlement-copyright-lawsuit-2026-07-20/">Anthropic's $1.5 billion copyright settlement with book authors</a>, Reuters reported, closing a chapter of litigation over the company's early training data. And in June, Reuters, citing Axios, reported that the U.S. government had moved to <a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-blocks-foreign-access-anthropics-most-advanced-ai-models-axios-reports-2026-06-13/">block foreign access </a>to Anthropic's most advanced models — a reminder that frontier AI is now entangled with export policy in ways that shape which customers can buy what.</p><p>Also shipping Friday: a Fast mode running at roughly 2.5 times default speed at twice the base price, automatic fallback routing on the API, and mid-conversation tool changes that no longer invalidate the prompt cache — a small feature that agent developers may appreciate more than any benchmark. Consistent with prior Opus models, Opus 5 carries no data retention requirements for general access, a point the spokesperson flagged unprompted for customers with "a hard zero data retention requirement." Developers can access the model as claude-opus-5 on the <a href="https://platform.claude.com/login?returnTo=%2F%3F">Claude API</a> starting today.</p><p>Two questions will determine whether the bet pays off: whether <a href="http://anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-5">Opus 5's efficiency claims </a>survive contact with production workloads at scale, and whether enterprises embrace a world where safety classifiers, not users, sometimes decide which model answers. But the deeper message of Friday's launch is that the AI industry's center of gravity has moved. For three years, the labs competed on what their best model could do on its best day. With Opus 5, Anthropic is competing on something less glamorous and far more lucrative: what a very good model can do every day, for half the price. In a market where the frontier keeps moving, Anthropic is wagering that the real fortune lies just behind it.</p><p>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why Cognition bought Poke: AI personality is becoming a competitive advantage]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AI coding startup Cognition has acquired Poke, the AI assistant you text like a friend, in a deal valuing the startup in the low nine figures. The acquisition brings Poke’s conversational style and interaction model to Cognition’s coding agent Devin, reflecting a growing belief that how AI assist...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692240/it-nachrichten/why-cognition-bought-poke-ai-personality-is-becoming-a-competitive-advantage/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692240/it-nachrichten/why-cognition-bought-poke-ai-personality-is-becoming-a-competitive-advantage/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 20:09:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[AI coding startup Cognition has acquired Poke, the AI assistant you text like a friend, in a deal valuing the startup in the low nine figures. The acquisition brings Poke’s conversational style and interaction model to Cognition’s coding agent Devin, reflecting a growing belief that how AI assistants interact with users is as important as the models powering them.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[You can’t ignore Google Zero anymore]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The web and Google once had a deal: Google collects data and indexes webpages and in exchange sends oceans of traffic to websites. The deal wasn't perfect and certainly made Google more money than it made the websites, but it worked for a long time. Now, however, the deal seems to be dead. And th...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692195/it-nachrichten/you-cant-ignore-google-zero-anymore/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692195/it-nachrichten/you-cant-ignore-google-zero-anymore/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 19:31:53 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The web and Google once had a deal: Google collects data and indexes webpages and in exchange sends oceans of traffic to websites. The deal wasn't perfect and certainly made Google more money than it made the websites, but it worked for a long time. Now, however, the deal seems to be dead. And the […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Stripe Eyes $10 Billion Deal For AI Model Marketplace OpenRouter]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[An anonymous reader quotes a report from PYMNTS.com: Stripe is in talks to buy OpenRouter, an artificial intelligence (AI) startup that could sell for roughly $10 billion, according to The Wall Street Journal. The move would mark a significant step outside payments for a company that processes tr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3692005/it-security-nachrichten/stripe-eyes-10-billion-deal-for-ai-model-marketplace-openrouter/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3692005/it-security-nachrichten/stripe-eyes-10-billion-deal-for-ai-model-marketplace-openrouter/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 18:18:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[An anonymous reader quotes a report from PYMNTS.com: Stripe is in talks to buy OpenRouter, an artificial intelligence (AI) startup that could sell for roughly $10 billion, according to The Wall Street Journal. The move would mark a significant step outside payments for a company that processes transactions for much of the internet. It also lands while Stripe pursues a far larger target: a bid for PayPal that would value the payments giant at about $53 billion.
 
The Journal reported Thursday (July 23) that a transaction could be announced soon, though the talks could still collapse or another buyer could step in. The exact price under discussion could not be learned. Several other large technology companies had also been weighing deals for OpenRouter. The startup was valued at $1.3 billion in May, according to PitchBook, meaning a sale near $10 billion would represent a steep markup in a matter of months. Its backers include Menlo Ventures and CapitalG, the growth fund of Google parent Alphabet.
 
OpenRouter sells software that lets customers reach AI models from OpenAI and Anthropic, along with open weight alternatives anyone can download and run. The Journal described the company's position this way: "OpenRouter is part of an emerging crop of startups that have found a lucrative niche between AI developers and the companies that want to use them." The platform lists hundreds of large language models and lets developers compare and switch between them.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Stripe+Eyes+%2410+Billion+Deal+For+AI+Model+Marketplace+OpenRouter%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fslashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F24%2F0719241%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fslashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F24%2F0719241%2Fstripe-eyes-10-billion-deal-for-ai-model-marketplace-openrouter%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://slashdot.org/story/26/07/24/0719241/stripe-eyes-10-billion-deal-for-ai-model-marketplace-openrouter?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Für Laptop, Handy & Co.: Kompaktes Multiport-Ladegerät von Anker jetzt günstig bei Amazon]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Zum simultanen Aufladen von Smartphone, Tablet und Laptop werden üblicherweise mehrere Ladegeräte und Steckdosen benötigt. Das momentan preiswert bei Amazon erhältliche Ladegerät Anker Nano II löst dieses Problem durch die Kombination von drei Anschlüssen innerhalb eines kompakten Geräts.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691979/android-tipps/fuer-laptop-handy-co-kompaktes-multiport-ladegeraet-von-anker-jetzt-guenstig-bei-amazon/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691979/android-tipps/fuer-laptop-handy-co-kompaktes-multiport-ladegeraet-von-anker-jetzt-guenstig-bei-amazon/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 18:05:23 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Zum simultanen Aufladen von Smartphone, Tablet und Laptop werden üblicherweise mehrere Ladegeräte und Steckdosen benötigt. Das momentan preiswert bei Amazon erhältliche Ladegerät Anker Nano II löst dieses Problem durch die Kombination von drei Anschlüssen innerhalb eines kompakten Geräts.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Auto nachrüsten: Kabelloser CarPlay-Adapter im Amazon-Deal jetzt für unter 100 Euro]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Mit dem aktuellen Deal auf Amazon rüstest du dein Fahrzeug kostengünstig mit einem smarten CarPlay-Adapter auf. Das kompakte Gerät bringt kabelloses Streaming und intelligente Sprachassistenz direkt auf den Bildschirm deines Autos.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691878/it-nachrichten/auto-nachruesten-kabelloser-carplay-adapter-im-amazon-deal-jetzt-fuer-unter-100-euro/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691878/it-nachrichten/auto-nachruesten-kabelloser-carplay-adapter-im-amazon-deal-jetzt-fuer-unter-100-euro/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:19:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mit dem aktuellen Deal auf Amazon rüstest du dein Fahrzeug kostengünstig mit einem smarten CarPlay-Adapter auf. Das kompakte Gerät bringt kabelloses Streaming und intelligente Sprachassistenz direkt auf den Bildschirm deines Autos.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Veterans Affairs signs $1.6B deal for an army of Salesforce AI agents]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Makes agreement under nose of Oracle, which gets its own $7 billion defense deal]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691855/it-nachrichten/veterans-affairs-signs-16b-deal-for-an-army-of-salesforce-ai-agents/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691855/it-nachrichten/veterans-affairs-signs-16b-deal-for-an-army-of-salesforce-ai-agents/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:58:20 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Makes agreement under nose of Oracle, which gets its own $7 billion defense deal]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[TechRadar Sustainability Awards 2026 — entries are now open!]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Tech has a sustainability problem, and we want to facilitate change. Our Sustainability Awards recognize brands making a meaningful impact, and here's how you can take part.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691802/it-nachrichten/techradar-sustainability-awards-2026-entries-are-now-open/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691802/it-nachrichten/techradar-sustainability-awards-2026-entries-are-now-open/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:45:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Tech has a sustainability problem, and we want to facilitate change. Our Sustainability Awards recognize brands making a meaningful impact, and here's how you can take part.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Perowskit-Tandemzelle hält 97 Prozent Wirkungsgrad nach 2.000 Stunden Schatten]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Solarzellen aus Perowskit und organischen Materialien gelten als leicht, flexibel und günstig in der Herstellung. Dieselben Vorteile teilen sie sich mit anderen Dünnschichttechnologien wie Cadmiumtellurid und Kupfer-Indium-Gallium-Selenid. Ein Problem bremst den breiten Einsatz all dieser Zellen ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691797/it-nachrichten/perowskit-tandemzelle-haelt-97-prozent-wirkungsgrad-nach-2000-stunden-schatten/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691797/it-nachrichten/perowskit-tandemzelle-haelt-97-prozent-wirkungsgrad-nach-2000-stunden-schatten/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:44:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Solarzellen aus Perowskit und organischen Materialien gelten als leicht, flexibel und günstig in der Herstellung. Dieselben Vorteile teilen sie sich mit anderen Dünnschichttechnologien wie Cadmiumtellurid und Kupfer-Indium-Gallium-Selenid. Ein Problem bremst den breiten Einsatz all dieser Zellen jedoch seit Jahren: Sobald Bäume, Wolken, Gebäude oder Vögel Teile eines Panels verschatten, entsteht in den betroffenen Zellen eine …]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[iPhone-Leasing | KI im Apple Store | iPhone Ultra – Apfelplausch #454]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Roman und Fabian sprechen heute über ein iPhone-Leasing-Modell, eine geplante KI-Beratung in der Apple Store-App, neue Gerüchte zum iPhone Ultra und dem vorerst abgesagten Paramount-Deal. ... Weiterlesen ...
Der Beitrag iPhone-Leasing | KI im Apple Store | iPhone Ultra – Apfelplausch #454 erschie...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691792/ios-mac-os/iphone-leasing-ki-im-apple-store-iphone-ultra-apfelplausch-454/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691792/ios-mac-os/iphone-leasing-ki-im-apple-store-iphone-ultra-apfelplausch-454/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:29:43 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img width="1920" height="1080" src="https://www.apfelpage.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Der-Apfelplausch.jpg" class="type:primaryImage wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://www.apfelpage.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Der-Apfelplausch.jpg 1920w, https://www.apfelpage.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Der-Apfelplausch-570x321.jpg 570w, https://www.apfelpage.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Der-Apfelplausch-564x317.jpg 564w, https://www.apfelpage.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Der-Apfelplausch-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.apfelpage.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Der-Apfelplausch-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https://www.apfelpage.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Der-Apfelplausch-270x152.jpg 270w, https://www.apfelpage.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Der-Apfelplausch-512x288.jpg 512w, https://www.apfelpage.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Der-Apfelplausch-1024x576.jpg 1024w" sizes="(max-width: 1920px) 100vw, 1920px"></figure>
<p>Roman und Fabian sprechen heute über ein iPhone-Leasing-Modell, eine geplante KI-Beratung in der Apple Store-App, neue Gerüchte zum iPhone Ultra und dem vorerst abgesagten Paramount-Deal. ... <a title="iPhone-Leasing | KI im Apple Store | iPhone Ultra – Apfelplausch #454" class="read-more" href="https://www.apfelpage.de/news/iphone-leasing-ki-im-apple-store-iphone-ultra-apfelplausch-454/" aria-label="Mehr Informationen über iPhone-Leasing | KI im Apple Store | iPhone Ultra – Apfelplausch #454">Weiterlesen ...</a></p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.apfelpage.de/news/iphone-leasing-ki-im-apple-store-iphone-ultra-apfelplausch-454/">iPhone-Leasing | KI im Apple Store | iPhone Ultra – Apfelplausch #454</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.apfelpage.de/">Apfelpage</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[AI's Biggest Hidden Security Flaw]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Security Weekly - A CRA Resource - Bewertung: 2x - Views:12 Modern LLMs process prompts by predicting the next token from context. They don't inherently distinguish system instructions from user instructions, and many "reasoning" models use the same underlying architecture while producing...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691785/it-security-video/ais-biggest-hidden-security-flaw/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691785/it-security-video/ais-biggest-hidden-security-flaw/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:22:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🎥 IT Security Video</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Security Weekly - A CRA Resource - Bewertung: 2x - Views:12 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/zKXmtFm-Gyw?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Modern LLMs process prompts by predicting the next token from context. They don't inherently distinguish system instructions from user instructions, and many "reasoning" models use the same underlying architecture while producing reasoning-style text.<br />
<br />
That makes prompt or command injection a persistent security challenge and highlights an important limitation: fluent explanations aren't necessarily evidence of genuine reasoning or understanding. Developers need additional safeguards instead of assuming the model can reliably separate trustworthy instructions from malicious ones.<br />
<br />
Should future AI models include stronger architectural separation between trusted instructions and user input, or can software safeguards solve the problem?<br />
<br />
Subscribe to our podcasts: https://securityweekly.com/subscribe<br />
<br />
#LLM #SecurityWeekly #Cybersecurity #InformationSecurity #AI #InfoSec<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-16767 | Ne-Lexa php-zip up to 4.0.2 ZIP src/ZipFile.php ZipFile::extractTo entryName path traversal (Issue 100 / EUVD-2026-48450)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability marked as critical has been reported in Ne-Lexa php-zip up to 4.0.2. This affects the function ZipFile::extractTo of the file src/ZipFile.php of the component ZIP Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument entryName results in path traversal.

This vulnerability is catalog...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691754/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-16767-ne-lexa-php-zip-up-to-402-zip-srczipfilephp-zipfileextractto-entryname-path-traversal-issue-100-euvd-2026-48450/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691754/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-16767-ne-lexa-php-zip-up-to-402-zip-srczipfilephp-zipfileextractto-entryname-path-traversal-issue-100-euvd-2026-48450/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:08:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability marked as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">critical</a> has been reported in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/ne-lexa:php-zip">Ne-Lexa php-zip up to 4.0.2</a>. This affects the function <code>ZipFile::extractTo</code> of the file <em>src/ZipFile.php</em> of the component <em>ZIP Handler</em>. Performing a manipulation of the argument <em>entryName</em> results in path traversal.

This vulnerability is cataloged as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-16767">CVE-2026-16767</a>. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.

The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How to watch Premier League 2026/27 free from anywhere with this VPN deal]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[All the ways to watch Premier League 2026/27 live streams for free online and from anywhere, using this VPN deal.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691745/it-nachrichten/how-to-watch-premier-league-202627-free-from-anywhere-with-this-vpn-deal/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691745/it-nachrichten/how-to-watch-premier-league-202627-free-from-anywhere-with-this-vpn-deal/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:05:13 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[All the ways to watch Premier League 2026/27 live streams for free online and from anywhere, using this VPN deal.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Updated Cyber Threat Actor Naming System]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Introduction 
Today, Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) will begin rolling out a unified naming schema for tracking threat actors. This new naming taxonomy represents an effort to standardize tracking across platforms and public reporting.
Why are we Adopting a Different Naming System?
Histo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691731/it-security-nachrichten/updated-cyber-threat-actor-naming-system/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691731/it-security-nachrichten/updated-cyber-threat-actor-naming-system/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 16:04:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="block-paragraph_advanced"><h2><strong>Introduction </strong></h2>
<p><span>Today, Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) will begin rolling out a unified naming schema for tracking threat actors. This new naming taxonomy represents an effort to standardize tracking across platforms and public reporting.</span></p>
<h2><strong>Why are we Adopting a Different Naming System?</strong></h2>
<p><span>Historically, Mandiant and Google’s Threat Analysis Group (TAG) maintained distinct tracking systems, relying on parallel naming schemas that grew independently over time. The creation of GTIG has necessitated a new, fused tracking system, and a new naming system. Thinking to the future, GTIG’s new system will rely on cryptonyms. Relying on sequential numbers or disparate identifiers (e.g. APT1) fails to provide defenders the critical context needed to operate quickly. Threat tracking shouldn’t be an exercise in memorization, but rather one of intuition. The new naming convention aligns with industry standard threat actor naming systems. </span></p>
<h2><strong>Our New Schema</strong></h2>
<p><span>Our new schema utilizes a cryptonym-based approach, employing memorable two-word combinations for each distinct threat actor:</span></p>
<ul>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><span>The </span><strong>first word</strong><span> is a unique and memorable term chosen to represent the specific actor, particularly names that may have been used in prior public reporting. If no previously used term exists, this word is randomly generated to remove bias, then vetted by our analysts.</span></p>
</li>
<li aria-level="1">
<p role="presentation"><span>The </span><strong>second word</strong><span> categorizes threat clusters by motivation, attribution, or activity type based on which category we consider to be most important for defense and response strategies.</span></p>
</li>
</ul>
<p><span>The table below provides a sample of how threat actor categories will map to the second word in each cryptonym:</span></p>
<div align="left">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div><table><colgroup><col><col></colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Origin or Type</strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Group Name</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><span>People’s Republic of China</span></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><span>CASTLE</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><span>Iran</span></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><span>ION</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><span>North Korea</span></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><span>NEPTUNE</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><span>Russia</span></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><span>RELIC</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p><span>Cybercriminal</span></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><span>COMET</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p><span>Table 1: Examples of Google’s new threat actor naming system categories</span></p>
<p><span>We know there are many threat actor tracking schemas in the industry, so we are intentionally seeking to keep this system as simple as possible to streamline operations and facilitate mapping to other naming taxonomies. However, a significant caveat remains: because no two organizations have the exact same visibility into the threat landscape, direct, apples-to-apples comparisons between threat actors are rarely possible. Transitioning to a convention that is simpler to follow and remember is a practical step toward managing a highly intricate tracking problem. </span></p>
<h2><strong>A Work in Progress</strong></h2>
<p><span>We have initially prioritized renaming several dozen of the most active groups, and will continue this process on a rolling basis. Previous names will remain indexed and searchable in the Google Threat Intelligence (GTI) platform, with MITRE ATT&amp;CK mappings and other vendor aliases preserved, see Figure 1. </span></p></div>
<div class="block-image_full_width">






  
    <div class="article-module h-c-page">
      <div class="h-c-grid">
  

    <figure class="article-image--large
      
      
        h-c-grid__col
        h-c-grid__col--6 h-c-grid__col--offset-3
        
        
      ">

      
      
        
        <img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/gweb-cloudblog-publish/images/image_22.max-1000x1000.png" alt="Updated Cyber Threat Actor Naming System Image 1">
        
        
      
        <figcaption class="article-image__caption "><p data-block-key="5g4yd">Figure 1: Threat actor name appearance in GTI platform on initial rollout</p></figcaption>
      
    </figure>

  
      </div>
    </div>
  




</div>
<div class="block-paragraph_advanced"><p><span>We will continue to use UNC, or “uncategorized” designations for threat clusters that are still in the early stages of investigation, as described </span><a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/how-mandiant-tracks-uncategorized-threat-actors"><span>here</span></a><span>.</span></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Why automotive repair needs domain-specific AI, not general-purpose models]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[General-purpose AI can't fix the automotive parts problem, purpose-built models can.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691719/it-nachrichten/why-automotive-repair-needs-domain-specific-ai-not-general-purpose-models/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691719/it-nachrichten/why-automotive-repair-needs-domain-specific-ai-not-general-purpose-models/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 15:56:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[General-purpose AI can't fix the automotive parts problem, purpose-built models can.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Own an LG monitor and tired of seeing that McAfee pop-up? Microsoft has banished it from Windows 11 — but wider issues need to be addressed here]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft kills McAfee ad served via LG monitor app in Windows 11 — but there are wider problems to deal with in Windows Update.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691686/it-nachrichten/own-an-lg-monitor-and-tired-of-seeing-that-mcafee-pop-up-microsoft-has-banished-it-from-windows-11-but-wider-issues-need-to-be-addressed-here/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691686/it-nachrichten/own-an-lg-monitor-and-tired-of-seeing-that-mcafee-pop-up-microsoft-has-banished-it-from-windows-11-but-wider-issues-need-to-be-addressed-here/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 15:33:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Microsoft kills McAfee ad served via LG monitor app in Windows 11 — but there are wider problems to deal with in Windows Update.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Bing Images Flaws Let Crafted SVGs Run Commands as SYSTEM on Microsoft's Servers]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A crafted SVG submitted to Bing's image search ran commands as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM on Microsoft's production image-processing workers, and as root on the Linux machines in the same fleet.

XBOW's testing got the same result on workers across different hosts and network ranges, so the problem sat ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691641/it-security-nachrichten/bing-images-flaws-let-crafted-svgs-run-commands-as-system-on-microsofts-servers/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691641/it-security-nachrichten/bing-images-flaws-let-crafted-svgs-run-commands-as-system-on-microsofts-servers/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 15:11:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A crafted SVG submitted to Bing's image search ran commands as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM on Microsoft's production image-processing workers, and as root on the Linux machines in the same fleet.

XBOW's testing got the same result on workers across different hosts and network ranges, so the problem sat in Bing's image tier, not on one bad machine. Microsoft issued two critical CVEs, CVE-2026-32194 and]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Intel’s AI chip boom sparks rally; Apple deal rumors add extra buzz]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Intel forecast stronger-than-expected third-quarter revenue and profit on Thursday, fueled by surging demand for its data-center CPUs amid…
The post Intel’s AI chip boom sparks rally; Apple deal rumors add extra buzz appeared first on MacDailyNews.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691599/ios-mac-os/intels-ai-chip-boom-sparks-rally-apple-deal-rumors-add-extra-buzz/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691599/ios-mac-os/intels-ai-chip-boom-sparks-rally-apple-deal-rumors-add-extra-buzz/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 15:01:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intel forecast stronger-than-expected third-quarter revenue and profit on Thursday, fueled by surging demand for its data-center CPUs amid…</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://macdailynews.com/2026/07/24/intels-ai-chip-boom-sparks-rally-apple-deal-rumors-add-extra-buzz/">Intel’s AI chip boom sparks rally; Apple deal rumors add extra buzz</a> appeared first on <a href="https://macdailynews.com/">MacDailyNews</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-5671 | Cyber-III Student-Management-System up to 1a938fa61e9f735078e9b291d2e6215b4942af3f Class Schedule Deletion Endpoint delete_batch.php batch cross site scripting (Issue 242)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in Cyber-III Student-Management-System up to 1a938fa61e9f735078e9b291d2e6215b4942af3f and classified as problematic. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /admin/class%20schedule/delete_batch.php of the component Class Schedule Deletion Endpoint. Executing a manipu...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691488/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-5671-cyber-iii-student-management-system-up-to-1a938fa61e9f735078e9b291d2e6215b4942af3f-class-schedule-deletion-endpoint-deletebatchphp-batch-cross-site-scripting-issue-242/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691488/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-5671-cyber-iii-student-management-system-up-to-1a938fa61e9f735078e9b291d2e6215b4942af3f-class-schedule-deletion-endpoint-deletebatchphp-batch-cross-site-scripting-issue-242/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:12:05 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/cyber-iii:student-management-system">Cyber-III Student-Management-System up to 1a938fa61e9f735078e9b291d2e6215b4942af3f</a> and classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">problematic</a>. Impacted is an unknown function of the file <em>/admin/class%20schedule/delete_batch.php</em> of the component <em>Class Schedule Deletion Endpoint</em>. Executing a manipulation of the argument <em>batch</em> can lead to cross site scripting.

This vulnerability is tracked as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-5671">CVE-2026-5671</a>. The attack can be launched remotely. Moreover, an exploit is present.

This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable.

The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[250 Eiffel Towers' worth of waste: The AI boom's toxic hardware problem]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Chips, servers, cables, and more could compound an already massive problem - here's who it affects and what's being done about it.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691473/it-security-nachrichten/250-eiffel-towers-worth-of-waste-the-ai-booms-toxic-hardware-problem/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691473/it-security-nachrichten/250-eiffel-towers-worth-of-waste-the-ai-booms-toxic-hardware-problem/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:10:26 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Chips, servers, cables, and more could compound an already massive problem - here's who it affects and what's being done about it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Getting a grip on shadow tokens and AI blowouts]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Four months of Claude Code — that’s all it took for Uber to burn through its entire annual budget for AI. Token after token, engineers embraced the platform with few control mechanisms tying costs to outcomes. The result was a budget runaway and a clear case study in how limited oversight snowbal...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691453/it-nachrichten/getting-a-grip-on-shadow-tokens-and-ai-blowouts/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691453/it-nachrichten/getting-a-grip-on-shadow-tokens-and-ai-blowouts/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:04:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Four months of Claude Code — that’s all it took for Uber to burn through its entire annual budget for AI. Token after token, engineers embraced the platform with few control mechanisms tying costs to outcomes. The result was a budget runaway and <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/janakirammsv/2026/05/17/uber-burns-its-2026-ai-budget-in-four-months-on-claude-code/">a clear case study</a> in how limited oversight snowballs into an AI blowout.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is a phenomenon I like to call “shadow tokens” — AI credits paid for by the company but largely invisible to decision-makers. Too many engineers have the final say over how much they consume and, therefore, what it costs. This all-you-can-eat attitude is part of the reason why <a href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/930447/microsoft-claude-code-discontinued-notepad">Microsoft is reportedly</a> winding down many internal licenses across key engineering teams and why <a href="https://www.thestreet.com/investing/the-next-phase-of-ai-spending-is-already-underway">one in five organizations</a> is missing its AI spend forecast by more than 50%.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And the trend is only accelerating. By 2028, <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4189149/ai-coding-token-costs-are-on-track-to-rival-human-payroll.html">Gartner predicts</a> that AI coding costs (driven by this kind of ungoverned consumption) will be as much per developer as the salary companies pay that person.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">LLMs and agents introduce a new class of variable cost that scales with behavior rather than headcount, putting enterprises on the hook for tools that balloon with workload. I don’t see this as enterprises overspending because they’re reckless — it’s down to a lack of managerial oversight, budget alignment that demands a proven return on investment, and engineer education on how much is too much.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Going forward, CIOs need to thread the AI needle between governance that encourages transparency and reasonable spend without stifling innovation.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">When shadow tokens result in real costs</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The issue is that AI isn’t a traditional line item. Previously, enterprise leaders onboarded software-as-a-service (SaaS) with a good idea of the total cost. An allocated software seat or annual contract was a known quantity. The cloud added some variation (with fluctuations depending on hosting size), but instances were still modelable. AI flips this status quo on its head — the unit of consumption is behavior and the cost is exponential.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And these specifics aren’t immediately apparent at pilot. Tools can appear inexpensive in controlled experiments yet unpredictably scale depending on session length, context window size, model selection and whether agents run in parallel. This is the fallacy of the $20-per-seat enterprise plan — tokens are charged separately at API rates with no ceiling. The final dollar value of any session is set by factors that finance can’t always model in advance, particularly when these decisions usually rest with the engineers themselves.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to <a href="https://www.deloitte.com/cz-sk/en/services/consulting/research/the-state-of-ai-in-the-enterprise.html">Deloitte</a>, only 21% of organizations deploying agents have a mature governance model, a real concern because they’re token-eating machines. This is what was happening at Uber — Claude Code in agentic mode was autonomously reading codebases, planning changes across dozens of files and opening pull requests. Each step quickly adds up, with Anthropic’s own documentation noting that agents consume approximately seven times as many tokens as standard sessions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is shadow IT and shadow AI, evolved. This time, however, many leaders approved the tool in question without guardrails governing consumption. AI hype adds fuel to the fire and normalizes long sessions. Uber’s CTO, for example, <a href="https://x.com/praveenTweets/status/2033627282418655711">described</a> a company-wide shift toward “agentic software engineering” with employees “who are quietly experimenting, quietly shipping and quietly pushing things forward”. This is an exciting way to test the limits of what’s possible, certainly, but it’s also a position that goes a long way to explaining how the company spent its annual AI budget by April.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Shifting the culture from usage to yield</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Engineers haven’t done anything wrong here. In fact, they’re adopting and experimenting as instructed, with Uber creating leaderboards and ranking users by token consumption. More use led to a better ranking, reflecting a culture that lauds new ways of doing things. This behavior is known as “<a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4178320/tokenmaxxing-when-ai-adoption-metrics-go-bad.html">tokenmaxxing</a>,” and its principal knock-on effect is shadow tokens — quantity-over-quality processes that leaders struggle to control until they’re fully realized in the budget. Of course, if management treats adoption metrics as performance metrics, then engineers can’t be blamed for using more tokens. The tension is that the teams driving adoption aren’t the ones managing spend.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of this is meant to dismiss AI’s productivity possibilities and potential return on investment. Developers save <a href="https://getdx.com/blog/ai-assisted-engineering-q4-impact-report-2025/">3.6 hours</a> per week, achieve 60% higher pull request throughput and cut onboarding time in half with automation. Meanwhile, Uber shared that roughly 11% of live backend updates were written by agents with no human in the loop. However, these wins aren’t the problem — it’s that too many teams aren’t connecting input to output. I’ve spoken to admins who discovered their token spend had tripled in a single quarter after using heavier models or accidentally doubling up on agentic applications. Nobody knew until the financial damage was done.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Automation needs to happen sustainably with an eye on the bottom line. In my view, a much better metric for achieving this is AI yield — the measurable business or engineering output generated per dollar spent on tokens. Otherwise, without a feedback loop, even genuinely productive teams are flying blind.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Stopping token waste before an AI blowout</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Creating that throughline between AI investment and token consumption starts with established financial metrics. This is possible via maximum spend limits (dictated by spend tagging, workload tiering and cost-per-output benchmarks) per team or project. Then, any additional allocation requires approval, closing the loop between the engineers spending the tokens and the leaders paying for them. AI isn’t cheap and teams should demonstrate a bang for their buck.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is something we do with our engineering team at Hexnode. Resource allocation for Claude Code and Cursor is tied directly to ROI rather than letting consumption run open-ended. Given the pay-as-you-go nature of these tools, a firm usage limit per team offers simple but essential control.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Similarly, there’s room to apply some of the governance principles IT uses for device management. Things like policy enforcement, role-based access, real-time monitoring and automated alerts can flag usage behavior in advance. Uncovering such insights at the token layer works to identify power users and prevent excessive spending.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We also need to encourage cultures that praise outputs that actually achieve efficiency. AI applications that result in shipping faster, reducing rework and cutting review cycles are gains that should be celebrated. If your company hosts leaderboards, frame unnecessary token burn as wasteful rather than valuable. The organizations creating healthier consumption habits work with their engineers to understand not just how to use AI, but what responsible use looks like and what it costs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is a conversation teams need to have now. Anthropic <a href="https://support.claude.com/en/articles/15036540-use-the-claude-agent-sdk-with-your-claude-plan">just ended flat-rate pricing</a> for programmatic workloads from June 15. Now, agents, continuous integration pipelines and automated workflows draw from a dedicated monthly credit pool billed separately from the subscription. Once that pool is exhausted, agent tasks either stop entirely or overflow to extra billing. Work can either get very expensive or grind to a halt for teams that aren’t prepared.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Getting a grip on shadow tokens means better rules and tools connecting spend to outcomes. Only by building the financial and cultural infrastructure that encourages sustainable adoption can leaders see what they’re spending, connect it to what they’re getting and course-correct before the costs become a crisis. Ultimately, shadow tokens are only invisible if we choose not to look.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Score the Top-Rated Amazon Fire 7 Kids Tablet Before This $70 Deal Ends]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Get ad-free content, easy parental controls and 10 hours of battery life.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691412/it-nachrichten/score-the-top-rated-amazon-fire-7-kids-tablet-before-this-70-deal-ends/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691412/it-nachrichten/score-the-top-rated-amazon-fire-7-kids-tablet-before-this-70-deal-ends/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:35:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Get ad-free content, easy parental controls and 10 hours of battery life.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Außenkamera und Leuchte in Einem: Doppelpack von Bosch im Preischeck]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Einbruchschutz und Außenbeleuchtung in einem Gerät: Das aktuelle Tink-Doppelpack der Bosch Eyes II verspricht Sicherheit ohne klobige Technik an der Hauswand. Wir haben den Deal geprüft!]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691388/it-security-nachrichten/aussenkamera-und-leuchte-in-einem-doppelpack-von-bosch-im-preischeck/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691388/it-security-nachrichten/aussenkamera-und-leuchte-in-einem-doppelpack-von-bosch-im-preischeck/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:26:17 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Einbruchschutz und Außenbeleuchtung in einem Gerät: Das aktuelle Tink-Doppelpack der Bosch Eyes II verspricht Sicherheit ohne klobige Technik an der Hauswand. Wir haben den Deal geprüft!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nur für 3 Tage: Media Markt und Saturn zeigen ihre Wochenendknaller]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Zum Wochenende starten Media Markt und Saturn mit günstigen Weekend-Deals. Unter anderem mit dabei: Neue Prospekte, die Rückkehr des Gutscheinhefts und frische Outlet-Schnäppchen. Wir zeigen euch die Highlights der Sales im Überblick.			(Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691387/it-security-nachrichten/nur-fuer-3-tage-media-markt-und-saturn-zeigen-ihre-wochenendknaller/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691387/it-security-nachrichten/nur-fuer-3-tage-media-markt-und-saturn-zeigen-ihre-wochenendknaller/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:26:15 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/news,160180.html"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="Schnäppchen, Rabattaktion, Deals, sale, Media Markt, Angebote, Saturn, Sonderangebote, prospekt, Angebot, shopping, Rabatt, Mediamarkt, Deal, Weekend Deals, Wochenendknaller, Weekend-Deals" width="1920" height="1080" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/1920/70263.jpg"></a>
			Zum Wochenende starten Media Markt und Saturn mit günstigen Weekend-Deals. Unter anderem mit dabei: Neue Prospekte, die Rückkehr des Gutscheinhefts und frische Outlet-Schnäppchen. Wir zeigen euch die Highlights der Sales im Überblick.			(<a href="https://winfuture.de/news,160180.html">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Atos launches sovereign cloud service to power comeback]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Atos has launched a new sovereign cloud platform aimed squarely at European public sector bodies, healthcare providers and defense organizations. It’s the latest effort by European companies in their fight back against US dominance.



Atos Sovereign Cloud offers a range of controls for data mana...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691386/it-security-nachrichten/atos-launches-sovereign-cloud-service-to-power-comeback/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691386/it-security-nachrichten/atos-launches-sovereign-cloud-service-to-power-comeback/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:26:14 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Atos has launched a new sovereign cloud platform aimed squarely at European public sector bodies, healthcare providers and defense organizations. It’s the latest effort by European companies in their fight back against US dominance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Atos Sovereign Cloud offers a range of controls for data management, providing customers with resilience and full control over their data, complying with existing European legislation on data residency.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Digital sovereignty has become a global operational priority for organizations that need to manage dependencies, jurisdictional exposure and disruption risks across complex digital environments. Atos Sovereign Cloud gives customers a practical way to apply sovereign controls to their most critical workloads, while preserving flexibility, resilience and the ability to innovate securely,” said Michael Kollar, Atos Group digital sovereignty leader.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There has been a concerted effort by <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4121422/europe-votes-to-tackle-deep-dependence-on-us-tech-in-sovereignty-drive.html">European organizations to meet US competition</a> head-on. Earlier this month, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4192767/cloud-sovereignty-first-four-providers-sign-up-to-cispe-certification-program.html">four companies signed up to the certification program</a> introduced by the European cloud body, CISPE,</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the latest effort by Atos to get the company back on track. In April, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4154186/french-government-take-bull-by-horns-for-e404-million.html">it sold its supercomputer company, Bull</a> to the French government, after a previous attempt in 2024 to <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/1310376/atos-deal-to-sell-its-legacy-service-business-falls-through.html">sell off its computer services division</a> and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2086965/atos-staves-off-bankruptcy-casts-wider-net-for-refinancing.html">after a refinancing deal</a> in the same year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company implemented a further round of refinancing this year and <a href="https://www.atosgroup.com/en/press/first-phase-refinancing-strategy-completed" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">in its half-yearly report</a> claimed that this was an “important milestone” in securing the company’s future. However, in its first-quarter results revenue showed an organic decline of 11 percent, so any projected growth may be some time in the future. Whether its Sovereign Cloud offering is the harbinger of the revival remains to be seen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4201118/atos-launches-sovereign-cloud-service-to-power-comeback.html">CIO</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft explains why its West US Azure and cloud services failed]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft cloud and Azure services hosted on the West Coast of the US went down for hours on Thursday when network connectivity failed. Although services running entirely within Microsoft’s West US cloud region were unaffected, any traffic entering or leaving the facilities was affected.



Micro...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691376/it-nachrichten/microsoft-explains-why-its-west-us-azure-and-cloud-services-failed/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691376/it-nachrichten/microsoft-explains-why-its-west-us-azure-and-cloud-services-failed/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:20:05 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft cloud and Azure services hosted on the West Coast of the US went down for hours on Thursday when network connectivity failed. Although services running entirely within Microsoft’s West US cloud region were unaffected, any traffic entering or leaving the facilities was affected.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft has now published a Preliminary Post Incident Review (PIR) of the incident, reporting that connectivity was lost for five hours between 14.44 UTC (7.44 a.m. Pacific Time) and 19.41 UTC on July 23. The problem was caused when a set of IP routes was removed in error while isolating a device for routine maintenance.<strong></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before starting the maintenance work, Microsoft checked that at least one of the two redundant paths to the facility remained operational. When it came to starting the work, however, automated systems included some additional devices in the perimeter to be isolated, and removing some IP routes that had not been included in the initial assessment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Customers discovered the problems very quickly, and engineers identified the issue within the first hour and started to reconnect services.  Microsoft said the disruption had been caused by some “recent fiber maintenance activity”.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To minimize the risk of disruption from such errors in the future, Microsoft advised organizations handling mission-critical data to consider a multi-region approach.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Azure outage was the second significant one to hit Microsoft this year. In February, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4127142/azure-outage-disrupts-vms-and-identity-services-for-over-10-hours.ht">there was a 10-hour disruption to US West and US East regions</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on Network World.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft explains why its West US Azure and cloud services failed]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Microsoft cloud and Azure services hosted on the West Coast of the US went down for hours on Thursday when network connectivity failed. Although services running entirely within Microsoft’s West US cloud region were unaffected, any traffic entering or leaving the facilities was affected.



Micro...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691358/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-explains-why-its-west-us-azure-and-cloud-services-failed/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691358/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-explains-why-its-west-us-azure-and-cloud-services-failed/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:12:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft cloud and Azure services hosted on the West Coast of the US went down for hours on Thursday when network connectivity failed. Although services running entirely within Microsoft’s West US cloud region were unaffected, any traffic entering or leaving the facilities was affected.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft has now published a Preliminary Post Incident Review (PIR) of the incident, reporting that connectivity was lost for five hours between 14.44 UTC (7.44 a.m. Pacific Time) and 19.41 UTC on July 23. The problem was caused when a set of IP routes was removed in error while isolating a device for routine maintenance.<strong></strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Before starting the maintenance work, Microsoft checked that at least one of the two redundant paths to the facility remained operational. When it came to starting the work, however, automated systems included some additional devices in the perimeter to be isolated, and removing some IP routes that had not been included in the initial assessment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Customers discovered the problems very quickly, and engineers identified the issue within the first hour and started to reconnect services.  Microsoft said the disruption had been caused by some “recent fiber maintenance activity”.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To minimize the risk of disruption from such errors in the future, Microsoft advised organizations handling mission-critical data to consider a multi-region approach.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Azure outage was the second significant one to hit Microsoft this year. In February, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4127142/azure-outage-disrupts-vms-and-identity-services-for-over-10-hours.ht">there was a 10-hour disruption to US West and US East regions</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Atos launches sovereign cloud service to power comeback]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Atos has launched a new sovereign cloud platform aimed squarely at European public sector bodies, healthcare providers and defense organizations. It’s the latest effort by European companies in their fight back against US dominance.



Atos Sovereign Cloud offers a range of controls for data mana...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691349/it-security-nachrichten/atos-launches-sovereign-cloud-service-to-power-comeback/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691349/it-security-nachrichten/atos-launches-sovereign-cloud-service-to-power-comeback/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 13:12:35 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Atos has launched a new sovereign cloud platform aimed squarely at European public sector bodies, healthcare providers and defense organizations. It’s the latest effort by European companies in their fight back against US dominance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Atos Sovereign Cloud offers a range of controls for data management, providing customers with resilience and full control over their data, complying with existing European legislation on data residency.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Digital sovereignty has become a global operational priority for organizations that need to manage dependencies, jurisdictional exposure and disruption risks across complex digital environments. Atos Sovereign Cloud gives customers a practical way to apply sovereign controls to their most critical workloads, while preserving flexibility, resilience and the ability to innovate securely,” said Michael Kollar, Atos Group digital sovereignty leader.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There has been a concerted effort by <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4121422/europe-votes-to-tackle-deep-dependence-on-us-tech-in-sovereignty-drive.html">European organizations to meet US competition</a> head-on. Earlier this month, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4192767/cloud-sovereignty-first-four-providers-sign-up-to-cispe-certification-program.html">four companies signed up to the certification program</a> introduced by the European cloud body, CISPE,</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the latest effort by Atos to get the company back on track. In April, <a href="https://www.networkworld.com/article/4154186/french-government-take-bull-by-horns-for-e404-million.html">it sold its supercomputer company, Bull</a> to the French government, after a previous attempt in 2024 to <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/1310376/atos-deal-to-sell-its-legacy-service-business-falls-through.html">sell off its computer services division</a> and <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/2086965/atos-staves-off-bankruptcy-casts-wider-net-for-refinancing.html">after a refinancing deal</a> in the same year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company implemented a further round of refinancing this year and <a href="https://www.atosgroup.com/en/press/first-phase-refinancing-strategy-completed" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">in its half-yearly report</a> claimed that this was an “important milestone” in securing the company’s future. However, in its first-quarter results revenue showed an organic decline of 11 percent, so any projected growth may be some time in the future. Whether its Sovereign Cloud offering is the harbinger of the revival remains to be seen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Dieser 7-Euro-Deal ist der Hammer: Smartphone UND Smartwatch zum Spottpreis]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ihr sucht ein 5G-Smartphone mit Tarif und wollt nicht zu viel zahlen? Das Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G mit 200-MP-Kamera gibt es jetzt im Bundle mit dem Blau Allnet M Tarif (40 GB 5G) – und ihr bekommt die Redmi Watch 5 Active gratis dazu.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691250/it-nachrichten/dieser-7-euro-deal-ist-der-hammer-smartphone-und-smartwatch-zum-spottpreis/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691250/it-nachrichten/dieser-7-euro-deal-ist-der-hammer-smartphone-und-smartwatch-zum-spottpreis/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:20:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ihr sucht ein 5G-Smartphone mit Tarif und wollt nicht zu viel zahlen? Das Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G mit 200-MP-Kamera gibt es jetzt im Bundle mit dem Blau Allnet M Tarif (40 GB 5G) – und ihr bekommt die Redmi Watch 5 Active gratis dazu.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[What is a business analyst? A key role for business-IT efficiency]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[What is a business analyst?



Business analysts (BAs) are responsible for bridging the gap between IT and the business using data analytics to assess processes, determine requirements, and deliver data-driven recommendations and reports to executives and stakeholders.



BAs engage with business...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691228/it-security-nachrichten/what-is-a-business-analyst-a-key-role-for-business-it-efficiency/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691228/it-security-nachrichten/what-is-a-business-analyst-a-key-role-for-business-it-efficiency/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:09:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What is a business analyst?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Business analysts (BAs) are responsible for bridging the gap between IT and the business using <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/191313/what-is-data-analytics-analyzing-and-managing-data-for-decisions.html">data analytics</a> to assess processes, determine requirements, and deliver data-driven recommendations and reports to executives and stakeholders.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">BAs engage with business leaders and users to understand how data-driven changes to process, products, services, software, and hardware can improve efficiencies and add value. They must articulate those ideas but also balance them against what’s technologically feasible and financially and functionally reasonable. Depending on the role, a business analyst might work with data sets to improve products, hardware, tools, software, services, or process.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The International Institute of Business Analysis (IIBA), a nonprofit professional association, considers the business analyst an agent of change, and says that <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/191157/what-is-business-analytics-using-data-to-predict-business-outcomes.html">business analysis</a> is a disciplined approach to introduce and manage change to organizations, whether they’re for-profit businesses, governments, or nonprofits.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Impact of AI on business analyst role</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As AI becomes commonplace in the tech industry, business analysts are embracing it as a tool to automate repetitive work in the role. AI tools can be used for workflow and diagramming, process mapping, data analysis, and to automate meeting minutes and transcribe meetings where requirements are established, all designed to speed up the process of analyzing data, creating visuals, and transcribing and writing user stories and acceptance criteria.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI tools can also help identify patterns, insights, and unique data points that might go unnoticed by humans, and allow a faster time to generate insights for organizations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Of course, as with all AI tools, they still require humans to oversee prompts, scripting, and evaluate AI outputs to ensure they’re accurate and valid. While they can’t replace the work of BAs, AI can help them spend more time on thoughtful analysis and decision making, rather than mundane tasks such as gathering and summarizing data, and querying.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst job description</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">BAs are responsible for creating new models that support business decisions by working closely with finance and IT teams to establish initiatives and strategies aimed at improving revenue and optimizing costs. They need a strong understanding of regulatory and reporting requirements, and have plenty of experience in forecasting, budgeting, and financial analysis combined with knowing KPIs, according to Robert Half Technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">According to Robert Half, a BA’s job description typically includes budgeting and forecasting, planning and monitoring, variance analysis, pricing, reporting, and creating a detailed business analysis in an effort to outline problems, opportunities, and solutions for a business. It also says BAs should be able to define business requirements and report them back to stakeholders.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Since BAs are tasked with prioritizing technical and functional requirements, identifying what clients want, and determining what’s feasible to deliver, the role requires a deep understanding of systems, how they function, who’ll need to be involved, and the necessary steps to get everyone on board.  </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The role is constantly evolving, especially as companies rely more on data to advise business operations. Every company has different issues that a business analyst can address, whether it’s dealing with outdated legacy systems, changing technologies, broken processes, poor client or customer satisfaction, or large, siloed organizations.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst skills</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The BA position requires both hard and soft skills, as they need to know how to pull, analyze, and report data trends, share that information with others, and apply it to business goals and needs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Not all BAs need a background in IT if they have a general understanding of how systems, products, and tools work. Alternatively, some have strong IT backgrounds and less experience in business, but are interested in shifting away from IT into this hybrid role, which often acts as a communicator between the business and IT sides of the organization. So having extensive experience in either area can be beneficial for BAs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.iiba.org/career-resources/new-to-business-analysis/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">According to the IIBA</a>, some of the most important skills and experience for a business analyst are:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Oral and written communication skills</li>



<li>Interpersonal, organizational, facilitation, and consultative skills</li>



<li>Analytical thinking and problem solving</li>



<li>Being detail-oriented and able to deliver a high level of accuracy</li>



<li>Knowledge of business structure</li>



<li>Stakeholder and cost-benefit analysis</li>



<li>Processes modeling</li>



<li>Understanding networks, databases, and other technologies</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For a more in-depth look at what it takes to succeed as a business analyst, click <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/189108/essential-traits-of-elite-business-analysts.html">here</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst salary</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The average annual salary for an IT business analyst is $80,692, according to <a href="https://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Business_Analyst%2C_IT/Salary" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">data from PayScale</a>. The highest paid BAs are in New York, where the average salary is 14% higher than the national average. Dallas, Texas, is second, with reported salaries 6.4% higher than the national average, closely followed by Washington, D.C., where salaries are 6.3% higher than the national average.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Some skills are in higher demand than others, with the potential to boost salary. According to Payscale, these are associated with higher BA salaries. These skills, and the amount they can boost your salary, include:</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><div class="overflow-table-wrapper"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td>Skills</td><td>Salary Boost</td></tr><tr><td>ScrumMaster</td><td>44%</td></tr><tr><td>Microsoft Azure</td><td>30%</td></tr><tr><td>Supply Chain</td><td>27%</td></tr><tr><td>Oracle eBusiness Suite</td><td>25%</td></tr><tr><td>Master Data Management (SAP MDM)</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>SAP Sales and Distribution (SAP SD)</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>Product Support</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>Microsoft Dynamics GP</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>SAP Quality Management (SAP QM)</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>Workday Software</td><td>15%</td></tr></tbody></table> </div></figure>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For tips on boosting your salary, click <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/189510/7-steps-business-analysts-can-take-to-earn-more.html">here</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analyst certifications</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Although business analysis is a relatively new discipline in IT, a handful of organizations already offer certifications to help boost your résumé and prove your merit as an analyst. Organizations such as the IIBA, IQBBA, IREB, and PMI each offer their own tailored certifications for business analysis. These include:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>IIBA <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/189169/ecba-certification-an-entry-level-credential-for-business-analysts.html">Entry Certificate in Business Analysis (ECBA)</a></li>



<li>IIBA Certification of Competency in Business Analysis (CCBA)</li>



<li>IIBA Certified Business Analysis Professional (CBAP)</li>



<li>IIBA Agile Analysis Certification (AAC)</li>



<li>IQBBA Certified Foundation Level Business Analyst (CFLBA)</li>



<li>IREB Certified Professional for Requirements Engineering (CPRE)</li>



<li>PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PBA)</li>



<li>Certified Analytics Professional (CAP)</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For more information about how to earn one of these certifications — and how much they cost — click <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/228834/6-business-analyst-certifications-to-advance-your-analytics-career.html">here</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Business analytics tools and software</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">BAs typically rely on software such as Microsoft’s Excel, PowerPoint, and Access, as well as SQL, Google Analytics, and Tableau. These tools help BAs collect and sort data, create graphs, write documents, and design visualizations to explain findings. You won’t necessarily need programming or database skills for a BA position, but if you already have these skills, they won’t hurt. The type of software and tools you’ll need to use, however, will depend on your job title and what the organization requires.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[3 cybersecurity issues that should keep every CEO awake at night]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[For years, I have been saying that cybersecurity is no longer a technology problem. It has become a business leadership challenge.



Yet, despite record levels of spending, ever-growing security teams, increasingly sophisticated technologies and a constant stream of new regulations, organization...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691226/it-security-nachrichten/3-cybersecurity-issues-that-should-keep-every-ceo-awake-at-night/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691226/it-security-nachrichten/3-cybersecurity-issues-that-should-keep-every-ceo-awake-at-night/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:09:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For years, I have been saying that cybersecurity is no longer a technology problem. It has become a business leadership challenge.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Yet, despite record levels of spending, ever-growing security teams, increasingly sophisticated technologies and a constant stream of new regulations, organizations continue to suffer major cyber incidents with alarming regularity. Every week seems to bring news of another ransomware attack, supply chain compromise or data breach affecting organizations that many would have assumed were well protected.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The obvious conclusion is that we are asking the wrong questions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Too many executive teams remain preoccupied with the latest threat actor, the newest security product the CISO wants to buy or the latest vulnerability making headlines. Those issues matter, but they are not what should be keeping CEOs awake at night.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In my view, there are three far more fundamental issues that deserve the attention of every chief executive.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">1. Corporate complexity, and the widening gap between business leadership and cybersecurity reality</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Perhaps the biggest cybersecurity risk facing large organizations today is not technical at all.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is the growing disconnect between executive perception and operational reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many boards genuinely believe their organizations are reasonably well protected. They receive regular dashboards showing improving maturity scores, increasing compliance levels, falling vulnerability counts and reassuring traffic-light reports.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unfortunately, cyber attackers do not read dashboards.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Behind those executive reports often lies an increasingly complex technology landscape, thousands of unmanaged digital assets, ageing infrastructure, rampant shadow IT, fragmented ownership, inconsistent governance and security teams struggling to keep pace with relentless business change.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The problem is rarely a lack of effort.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is that corporate complexity has reached a level where traditional governance mechanisms are no longer capable of providing an accurate picture of organizational resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Executives believe they understand the level of cyber risk they face because they receive regular reports. Those reports often measure activity rather than resilience.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Governance committees end up debating around another percentage point of phishing awareness or vulnerability remediation, while fundamental issues remain unaddressed in the background.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">2. Organizational inertia, and the need for executive structure to evolve faster</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cyber criminals continue to evolve rapidly. Large organizations generally do not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the second issue that should concern every CEO.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Throughout my career, I have observed organizations repeatedly responding to new cyber threats by adding another technology platform, another monitoring capability, another compliance framework or another governance committee.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Very rarely do they stop to redesign how cybersecurity operates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The result is what I described several years ago as the “<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Cybersecurity-Spiral-Failure-How-Break/dp/1637353057/">Cybersecurity Spiral of Failure</a>”.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>As complexity and regulation increase, organizations invest in more security products.</li>



<li>More products create more complexity.</li>



<li>More products and greater complexity generate more alerts.</li>



<li>More alerts require more analysts.</li>



<li>More analysts produce more reports.</li>



<li>More reports continue to build up executive confidence.</li>



<li>Meanwhile, the underlying structural weaknesses remain largely unchanged, technical debt piles up and costs escalate.</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And when the inevitable breach eventually happens, reality reveals itself, but distrust also sets in between senior executives and security teams.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is not a funding problem. Nor is it a skills problem. It is fundamentally an operating model problem.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Many organizations continue trying to solve twenty-first century challenges using governance, accountability, organizational and reporting structures designed twenty-five years ago.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The cybersecurity function itself has evolved dramatically. Many executive structures have not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This organizational inertia extends beyond technology: It affects budgeting cycles, <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4193990/reallocating-cybersecurity-capital-in-the-mythos-era.html">investment priorities</a>, procurement processes, accountability models and decision-making speed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cyber attackers innovate every day. Organizational change often takes years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That imbalance should worry every CEO.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">3. Accelerating technological disruption, and how it challenges organizations in areas where they are intrinsically weak</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The third issue is potentially the most significant over the coming decade.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Artificial intelligence, autonomous agents and machine identities</li>



<li>Software supply chain complexity.</li>



<li>Quantum computing, and post-quantum cryptography</li>
</ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each of these developments represents far more than another technical trend.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Together, they fundamentally change the dynamics of cybersecurity.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Artificial intelligence is transforming countless business processes. At the same time, it is also increasing both the speed and sophistication of cyber-attacks while simultaneously transforming defensive capabilities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Organizations have become increasingly dependent on software ecosystems that extend far beyond their own direct control. Engaging with the supply chain in ways that lead to a genuine appreciation of the risks involved has become a key challenge for most cybersecurity practices.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Quantum computing may eventually invalidate much of today’s cryptographic algorithms, forcing organizations into one of the largest technology efforts since Y2K — but without the benefit of a fixed deadline and faced by a problem that is considerably more complex and hyperconnected IT estates that have little to do with those of the late 90s.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of these challenges can be solved overnight: They require clear governance, sustained investment over a few years and cross-functional organizational coordination.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most large organizations are weak on those three fronts: This is precisely why CEOs should be focusing on them now.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Waiting until some of those risks become obvious will almost certainly be too late.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Businesses naturally prioritise immediate commercial pressures. Cybersecurity often involves preparing for risks whose timing remains uncertain.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But one of the greatest leadership failures I keep seeing remains the inability of organizations to act decisively on known unknowns.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That tension explains why many organizations delay action until external events force them to respond. Unfortunately, cybersecurity rarely rewards late action.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Leadership will determine who succeeds</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cybersecurity discussions still frequently focus on technology. I believe they should focus far more on leadership.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Technology will continue evolving. Threat actors will continue adapting. Regulations will continue expanding. Those developments are inevitable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What remains within the control of every CEO is how their organization responds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Does cybersecurity remain an IT issue? Or is it recognised as an integral part of business resilience?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">How is cybersecurity accountability assigned at executive level? Or does it still rest largely with a CISO hidden in the organization?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Does the board spend sufficient time discussing resilience? Or does cybersecurity appear only when approving budgets or reviewing incidents?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">These questions will increasingly determine organizational success.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The companies that navigate the next decade successfully will not necessarily be those spending the most on cybersecurity. Nor will they be those deploying the latest security technologies first.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">They will be the organizations whose leadership recognises that cybersecurity has become a permanent business capability — embedded into governance, strategy, operational decision-making and organizational culture.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That transformation cannot be delegated. It begins with the CEO.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And perhaps that is the single biggest issue that should keep every chief executive awake at night: Not when the next cyber-attack will happen, but whether their organization is evolving quickly enough on those matters to meet a threat landscape that is changing much faster than the business itself.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CIOs beware: DNS KSK rollover could kick off wave of mysterious outages]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Predicting an outage is tricky business, but CIOs might want to circle Oct. 11, 2026, through Jan. 11, 2027, for likely trouble of a potentially widespread and puzzling nature.



That’s because a relatively trivial update to DNSSEC on Oct. 11, one that will take full effect by Jan. 11, is likely...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691225/it-security-nachrichten/cios-beware-dns-ksk-rollover-could-kick-off-wave-of-mysterious-outages/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691225/it-security-nachrichten/cios-beware-dns-ksk-rollover-could-kick-off-wave-of-mysterious-outages/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:09:00 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Predicting an outage is tricky business, but CIOs might want to circle Oct. 11, 2026, through Jan. 11, 2027, for likely trouble of a potentially widespread and puzzling nature.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s because a relatively trivial update to DNSSEC on Oct. 11, one that will take full effect by Jan. 11, is likely to deliver a series of seemingly unrelated system outages. This will come from oceans of dependencies from third-party, shadow, agentic, gen AI, SaaS, homegrown, and legacy apps — among many other quiet executable hiding spots, including virtual environments and containers.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/joshithak/">Sai Joshitha Kathari</a>, senior site reliability engineer at payment card giant Visa, says most enterprises have far more DNS-related exposure than they realize because of these many dependencies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This has the potential to create real downstream destruction when unresolved failures sit underneath important business functions,” Kathari says. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The danger is that so many of these issues are either unknown to IT or handled by a third-party vendor and no one in IT has had reason to ask those vendors about DNS updates. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The risky areas are usually not the obvious managed DNS services. They are the older internal applications, hardcoded resolvers, containerized workloads, sidecar configurations, custom scripts, partner integrations, VM images, stale base images, and service-to-service dependencies that nobody has touched in a long time,” Kathari explains. “These systems can keep working quietly for years, then fail during a DNS or certificate-related change because they bypassed the normal platform standards.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Independent technology analyst <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/carmi/">Carmi Levy</a> says that CIOs need to take this event very seriously. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The two-pronged deadline — October 11, 2026, when the new Key Signing Key (KSK) begins signing the root zone, and January 11, 2027, when the old key is retired — should be marked in red on everyone’s calendar, just as December 31, 1999, once was,” Levy says. “Failure to comply could result in websites, critical business applications, and related resources dropping off the face of the Earth once the transition is complete.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Levy adds: “Custom-built code that lives outside conventional support mechanisms may or may not function when the DNS changes go into effect.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://www.icann.org/resources/press-material/release-2026-05-20-en">DNSSEC update itself</a> is straightforward, but it is also the first significant DNSSEC change — specifically a change in the trust anchor — since 2018. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The rollout statement noted that “the trust anchor is formally known as the Domain Name System Security Extensions (DNSSEC) root zone Key Signing Key (KSK). The KSK is the cryptographic key at the core of the DNSSEC trust anchor and is used to verify that DNS responses are legitimate and have not been modified in transit.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Expect nearly every enterprise to be impacted</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/kimdavies/">Kim Davies</a>, vice president of IANA Services and president of public technical identifiers at ICANN, says the extent of the impact on enterprises is unknowable, given the nature of shadow IT and other edge cases. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But based on the massive number of dependencies both known and unknown in the typical global enterprise, Davies guesses that just about every enterprise will be impacted, to varying degrees. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“In highly complex organizations, it is very likely there will be some impact in the corners, in the margins, of the organization,” Davies tells CIO. “DNS is such a core technology that underpins everything.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As the updates propagate, hiccups will materialize, Davies notes. “When the system cannot validate the [DNS] information, it will treat it as suspect and DNS lookups will fail.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Visa’s Kathari says, “Enterprises should expect some secondary DNS-related glitches when major DNSSEC-related changes happen, not necessarily because the core infrastructure teams will ignore the update, but because large environments have many hidden dependency paths.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Making this problem far worse, Kathari notes, is that the glitches will likely initially look like anything other thana DNS glitch. That will force IT staff to waste a vast number of hours chasing causes that ultimately prove to be unrelated to the incidents. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The impact for CIOs is that DNS failures rarely announce themselves as DNS failures. They look like application timeouts, broken logins, failed API calls, queue lag, payment failures, partner connectivity issues, or random regional instability,” Kathari explains. “That makes troubleshooting slower because teams may spend hours looking at the application, database, network, or cloud provider before realizing name resolution is part of the failure path.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://greyhoundresearch.com/svg/">Sanchit Vir Gogia</a>, chief analyst at Greyhound Research, agrees that IT will likely spin its wheels chasing the wrong ghosts.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“A validation failure rarely stays in its lane. It surfaces as an application error, an API timeout, or a reachability problem, which turns a resolver fault into a coordination failure,” Gogia says. “The application team blames the network, the network team blames the cloud, and the user simply watches work stop.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Images and templates are the frontier most teams miss,” Gogia adds. “A resolver fixed in summer can be broken again in October the instant a stale golden image is redeployed, because automation no longer lets configuration drift slowly. It restores yesterday’s assumptions at machine speed.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It is widely expected that enterprises will not have any problems executing the change or, more likely, relying on their hyperscalers to properly handle the change. That is the concern. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“CIOs are being distracted so much with AI and this is such a deep in the weeds infrastructure issue that this can and willcatch people off-guard,” <a href="https://acceligence.com/talent/profiles/justin-greis/">Justin Greis</a>, CEO of consulting firm Acceligence, tells CIO. “I think we’ll see a meaningful number of enterprise disruptions associated with the DNSSEC trust anchor rollover. Not because the update itself is especially difficult, but because it will expose weaknesses that already exist inside many organizations.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most enterprise IT operations have had no reason to compile a comprehensive list of all DNS dependencies, but many will be instantly discovered in January. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Potentially widespread fallout</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A major retailer, for example, might suddenly be unable to connect with FedEx to arrange for deliveries or a hospital may find that test results are no longer being shared with patient portals. It might manifest as an assembly line that halts because an IIoT component can no longer share files with its vendor system or a truck fleet that stops being tracked. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“There will almost certainly be systems that fall through the cracks. Some will be legacy applications that rely on outdated DNS configurations that have not been updated in years,” Greis says. “Others will be business-unit-developed tools, contractor-built solutions, embedded systems, manufacturing and industrial systems, or highly customized workloads that operate outside normal IT oversight. These are the types of systems that often surface during infrastructure events like this.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Greis adds that many enterprises will discover in January problems created by their own automation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Over time, enterprises build layers of processes, templates, and deployment mechanisms that are reused across teams and environments,” Greis notes. “Even after DNS infrastructure is updated correctly, older settings can inadvertently be reintroduced through routine updates and system changes, creating intermittent and difficult-to-diagnose failures.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The good news from this situation is that enterprises are not going to likely lose all DNS access if any of these glitches occur. But that may be of no comfort because even if the disruptions are only with small edge cases, that can still cause massive operational disruptions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/cricketliu/">Cricket Liu</a>, EVP and chief evangelist at Infoblox, gives the example of a DNS server that responds to factory-floor system queries.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Or let’s say this disrupts [an enterprise’s key] SaaS application. All name resolution may stop and it will show a server failure. It will not deliver a response whenever I look anything up. That’s not subtle at all,” Liu says. “It’s highly likely that companies are going to see some effects.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Back in 2017, the switchover was relatively uneventful, giving some CIOs hope that January 2027 will also be a non-event. But given the technology advancements in the last 10 years and the resulting tidal wave of new enterprise tech dependencies, few are realistically expecting no problems this go around. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Impossible to predict what will happen</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One of the top network experts on DNS effects in enterprises is <a href="https://blog.apnic.net/author/geoff-huston/">Geoff Huston</a>, chief scientist at the Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC), the regional Internet Registry administering IP addresses for the Asia Pacific region.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Huston says it is difficult to project what will happen in January until it happens.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Just like the last time, we are flying blind with this key roll. Because nothing really terrible happened last time, there is some confidence that nothing terrible will happen this time, but we just can’t tell in advance as there are no good measurement approaches that allow us to peek inside the trust state of recursive resolvers,” he says.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As for potential edge-case glitches, Huston says it is possible, but if third-party vendors do not properly handle the update, there will be other issues as well, as the KSK cryptographic key used within DNSSEC signs and validates the keys that protect DNS records. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“If it is not standards-compliant, then you have more problems than just the KSK roll,” Huston says, “as it raises the obvious question of ‘What else is not correctly implemented in the DNS resolver that I’m running?’”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As a silver lining, Acceligence’s Greis says any hiccups that result from the DNS KSK update may be a gift in disguise for CIOs. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The irony is that some of the most business-critical components in the technology stack are often the least visible because they work in the background,” Greis says. January “may reveal how much modern business resilience depends on infrastructure that many organizations rarely examine until something breaks. For CIOs, that’s the real lesson. This is not fundamentally a story about a DNS update. It is a story about operational visibility, resilience, and governance. Organizations that treat the rollover as a routine infrastructure task will likely complete the update and move on. Organizations that use it as an opportunity to understand and strengthen the foundations of their technology environment may gain far more value than simply avoiding an outage.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-5529 | Dromara lamp-cloud up to 5.8.1 DefUserController /defUser/pageUser improper authorization (Issue 403)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability has been found in Dromara lamp-cloud up to 5.8.1 and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects the function pageUser of the file /defUser/pageUser of the component DefUserController. Performing a manipulation results in improper authorization.

This vulnerability is ident...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691131/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-5529-dromara-lamp-cloud-up-to-581-defusercontroller-defuserpageuser-improper-authorization-issue-403/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691131/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-5529-dromara-lamp-cloud-up-to-581-defusercontroller-defuserpageuser-improper-authorization-issue-403/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 11:34:57 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability has been found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/dromara:lamp-cloud">Dromara lamp-cloud up to 5.8.1</a> and classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">critical</a>. This vulnerability affects the function <code>pageUser</code> of the file <em>/defUser/pageUser</em> of the component <em>DefUserController</em>. Performing a manipulation results in improper authorization.

This vulnerability is identified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-5529">CVE-2026-5529</a>. The attack can be initiated remotely. Additionally, an exploit exists.

The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Maybe the Biggest Problem With A.I. in the Workplace Is People]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Learning to use A.I. effectively at work is all about using the same tried-and-true skills we use to be a better manager and collaborator.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691117/ai-nachrichten/maybe-the-biggest-problem-with-ai-in-the-workplace-is-people/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691117/ai-nachrichten/maybe-the-biggest-problem-with-ai-in-the-workplace-is-people/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 11:27:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Learning to use A.I. effectively at work is all about using the same tried-and-true skills we use to be a better manager and collaborator.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How to execute queries in parallel using EF Core]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[EF Core is Microsoft’s flagship ORM (object-relational mapper), the software layer that allows .NET developers to work with relational databases. The DbContext class is the core component of the EF Core framework for managing database operations. However, the DbContext class in EF Core is not thr...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691080/ai-nachrichten/how-to-execute-queries-in-parallel-using-ef-core/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691080/ai-nachrichten/how-to-execute-queries-in-parallel-using-ef-core/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 11:04:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">EF Core is Microsoft’s flagship ORM (object-relational mapper), the software layer that allows .NET developers to work with relational databases. The <code>DbContext</code> class is the core component of the EF Core framework for managing database operations. However, the <code>DbContext</code> class in EF Core is not thread-safe. Hence, if you share <code>DbContext</code> instances between multiple threads, you will often encounter data corruption issues and the <code>InvalidOperationException</code>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In this article, we’ll learn how we can execute queries in parallel in EF Core by handling thread-safety issues to avoid concurrency errors. To work with the code examples provided in this article, you should have Visual Studio 2026 installed in your system. You can <a href="https://visualstudio.microsoft.com/insiders/">download Visual Studio 2026 here</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Executing EF Core queries in parallel – the problem</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When working in today’s data-driven applications, you will often need to fetch data from multiple unrelated datasets. In applications that use concurrency, thread-safety is critical to guaranteeing correct execution, avoiding data corruption and race conditions, and ensuring data consistency. Let’s understand this with an example. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Let’s say we want to populate a dashboard that displays all recently processed orders, metrics, logs, and traces, as well as your application’s performance metadata. We might write the following code. </p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>public class Dashboard
{
    public List Orders { get; set; } = new();
    public Metrics Metrics { get; set; } = new();
    public List Logs { get; set; } = new();
    public List Traces { get; set; } = new();
}
public static async Task LoadDashboardAsync(ProductService productService)
{
    Task&lt;List&gt;    ordersTask  = productService.GetProcessedOrdersAsync();
    Task        metricsTask = productService.GetMetricsAsync();
    Task&lt;List&gt; logsTask    = productService.GetRecentLogsAsync();
    Task&lt;List&gt;    tracesTask  = productService.GetTracesAsync();
    await Task.WhenAll(ordersTask, metricsTask, logsTask, tracesTask);
    return new Dashboard
    {
        Orders  = await ordersTask,
        Metrics = await metricsTask,
        Logs    = await logsTask,
        Traces  = await tracesTask
    };
}
</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the preceding code snippet, there are four read operations that are executed by four different <code>Task</code> instances. Our objective is to ensure that the database round trips run in parallel instead of in sequence. We can accomplish this by using<code>Task.WhenAll</code>, which starts the four tasks, waits for every task to finish, then returns the data wrapped inside a new <code>Dashboard</code> instance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If we executed these queries sequentially, the user would have to wait until each query completed its execution in turn—for a total wait time equal to the sum of the times for all four queries. However, by running these queries in parallel, we reduce the wait time considerably. The user will need to wait only as long as it takes for the slowest of the four queries to complete its execution.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, there is a danger with the above approach. If you run multiple operations on the same <code>DbContext</code> instance, you will see an <code>InvalidOperationException</code> with the following message:</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A second operation started in this context before the previous operation was completed. This is usually caused by multiple threads using the same <code>DbContext</code> instance; instance members are not guaranteed to be thread-safe.</p>
</blockquote>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Databases such as SQL Server, PostgreSQL, and Oracle Database follow a request-response communication model at the connection level: a single connection can process only one command at a time. Hence, you cannot run multiple queries concurrently using the connection. If you <code>await</code> several operations using the same connection, EF Core detects the overlapping use of a non-thread-safe context and throws an <code>InvalidOperationException</code>. To run queries in parallel, you must give each task its own connection or context.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Why DbContext isn’t thread-safe – and how to work around it</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <code>DbContext</code> class in EF Core is designed to manage a single unit of work. To be more precise, EF Core does not provide support for running multiple operations on the same <code>DbContext</code> instance. This design approach creates inherent challenges when you use the same <code>DbContext</code> instance across multiple threads. If <code>DbContext</code> were thread-safe, extensive locking would be required, which would degrade data access performance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This stateful design of <code>DbContext</code> makes it unsuitable for concurrent access patterns that involve loading, modifying, or tracking different sets of data simultaneously, because it needs to maintain the internal representation of database state.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/change-tracking/" data-type="link" data-id="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/change-tracking/">change tracker</a> is one of the most important components of <code>DbContext</code> in EF Core. It monitors all entities loaded into memory and detects any changes made to them after they have been loaded. It keeps track of the original, current, and changed values of the entities, thereby enabling the EF Core runtime to know the current state of these entities when you call the <code>SaveChanges()</code> method on the <code>DbContext</code> instance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">To implement thread-safety when working with DbContext, we must write our code to ensure that each concurrent operation gets its own copy of a short-lived instance. Now, we <em>could</em> accomplish this by wrapping a shared <code>DbContext</code> instance inside a thread-safe block using the <code>lock</code> keyword, so that all calls to the database take place using one and only one thread at a time. This approach is illustrated in the code snippet below. </p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
public class Product
{
    public int Id { get; set; }
    public string Name { get; set; } = string.Empty;
    public decimal Price { get; set; }
    public int Quantity { get; set; }
}
public class AppDbContext : DbContext
{
    public AppDbContext(DbContextOptions options) : base(options) { }
    public DbSet Products =&gt; Set();
}
</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, while the above approach gives us the thread-safety we need, it can degrade data access performance considerably. A better approach is to use <code>IDbContextFactory</code> , which creates fresh <code>DbContext</code> instances on demand. Calling its <code>CreateDbContext()</code> method is cheap and produces a fresh, isolated context every time. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The following code snippet shows how you can register an instance of type <code>IDbContextFactory</code> as a singleton. You can safely call this code from any thread.</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>builder.Services.AddDbContextFactory(options =&gt;
    options.UseSqlServer(
        builder.Configuration.GetConnectionString("Default")));
</code></pre>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Executing EF Core queries in parallel – the solution</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now let’s see how we can put <code>IDbContextFactory</code> to work. The following code illustrates a class named <code>ProductService</code> that uses a factory to create <code>DbContext</code> instances for each scope of work.</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>public class ProductService
{
    private readonly IDbContextFactory _factory;
    public ProductService(IDbContextFactory factory)
        =&gt; _factory = factory;
    public async Task GetByIdAsync(int id)
    {
        await using var context = await _factory.CreateDbContextAsync();
        return await context.Products.FindAsync(id);
    }
    public async Task UpdateStockQuantityAsync(int id, int updateQuantity)
    {
        await using var context = await _factory.CreateDbContextAsync();
        var product = await context.Products.FindAsync(id);
        if (product is null) return;
        product.Quantity += updateQuantity;
        await context.SaveChangesAsync();
    }
}
</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Note that <code>ProductService</code> has two methods, <code>GetByIdAsync</code> and <code>UpdateStockQuantityAsync</code>. An instance of the <code>DbContext</code> class is created locally in each of these methods. Now, suppose you have two threads, T1 and T2, that execute these methods concurrently. That is, thread T1 executes the <code>GetByIdAsync</code> method while thread T2 executes the <code>UpdateStockQuantityAsync</code> method. Because each of these methods is executed in isolation, they will have their own context, connection, and change-tracking information, and there will be no mutable state, so you don’t need to implement thread synchronization in either of these methods.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Consider the following code that executes a read operation and an update operation in two separate tasks. </p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>public static async Task RunMethodsInParallelAsync(ProductService productService)
{
      Task readTask = productService.GetByIdAsync(1);
      Task updateTask = productService.UpdateStockQuantityAsync(3, 5);
      await Task.WhenAll(readTask, updateTask);
      Product? product = await readTask;
 }
</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <code>Task.WhenAll</code> method runs the two tasks in parallel and waits until both have finished. The reason this approach is thread-safe, and will not create concurrency errors, is that each of these two methods creates its own <code>DbContext</code> instance internally. Therefore the read operation and the update operation use independent <code>DbContext</code> instances.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Use DbContext pooling to reduce allocation cost</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Although creating <code>DbContext</code> instances is not that costly, you should consider using pooled contexts in applications that require high scalability and high performance. The following code snippet shows how you can register a pooled context. </p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code>builder.Services.AddPooledDbContextFactory(options =&gt;
    options.UseSqlServer(connectionString));
</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A call to <code>AddDbContext()</code> will register a <code>DbContext</code> instance as scoped per HTTP request. Each request will run on a different thread and each will have its own context. However, keep in mind that the default scoped registration of the <code>DbContext</code> will not always suffice.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You will need a factory to create instances of <code>DbContext</code> when you’re using a background service, or performing some work inside a particular request, or running some business logic operation over multiple contexts.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Key takeaways</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>If you use EF Core in the data access layer of your application, you must implement thread safety measures whenever you run your queries in parallel.</li>



<li>You cannot execute multiple queries in parallel in EF Core using the same <code>DbContext</code> instance.</li>



<li>The <code>IDbContextFactory</code> enables you to create a <code>DbContext</code> instance for each thread, thereby enabling you to work with these instances in isolation.</li>



<li>Although using a <code>DbContext</code> pool involves a small allocation overhead, it becomes a non-issue if you need high throughput.</li>
</ul>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Microsoft agent framework wars are over. The real architecture decision starts now]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Over the past year, I had the same conversation with almost every team starting an AI initiative. Should we build on Semantic Kernel, AutoGen or Foundry?



At first it felt like the most important architectural decision we’d make. Each framework had its own philosophy, each promised to be the fo...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691079/ai-nachrichten/the-microsoft-agent-framework-wars-are-over-the-real-architecture-decision-starts-now/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691079/ai-nachrichten/the-microsoft-agent-framework-wars-are-over-the-real-architecture-decision-starts-now/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 11:04:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over the past year, I had the same conversation with almost every team starting an AI initiative. Should we build on Semantic Kernel, AutoGen or Foundry?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At first it felt like the most important architectural decision we’d make. Each framework had its own philosophy, each promised to be the foundation for enterprise AI, and picking the wrong one felt like an expensive mistake. I spent a lot of time helping teams weigh the trade-offs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Looking back, I think we were asking the wrong question. I certainly was.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I watched teams spend months debating SDKs while the decisions that actually decided whether their applications survived production went unexamined. Some built elaborate orchestration layers for workflows that a few deterministic functions would have handled. Others avoided agent frameworks entirely and later found they’d designed themselves into a corner.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then Microsoft settled it for us. It <a href="https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/agent-framework/overview/">introduced the unified Agent Framework</a>, quietly moved Semantic Kernel and AutoGen into <a href="https://devblogs.microsoft.com/agent-framework/migrate-your-semantic-kernel-and-autogen-projects-to-microsoft-agent-framework-release-candidate/">maintenance mode</a>, and the debate I’d spent months refereeing was suddenly over. Turns out the answer to “which of the three” was “none of the three, here’s a fourth.” The framework hit version 1.0 and general availability in April 2026, stable across .NET and Python.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">What surprised me wasn’t the decision. It was how fast a debate that had eaten so much of our attention stopped mattering. Microsoft changed the menu.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It didn’t change the meal.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The framework was never the hard part</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Framework selection dominated almost every early conversation I had about enterprise agents. Which SDK do we standardize on? Which orchestration model gives us the most flexibility? Which one is Microsoft actually betting on?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Fair questions. But after a year of watching these projects play out, I’ve slowly come around to a different view. Those weren’t the questions that decided anything.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first question I ask now is much smaller. Does this thing actually need an agent?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It sounds obvious, and I still get it wrong sometimes. But it’s the mistake I see most. On one project, a team spent weeks designing a multi-agent workflow for a process that ran the same four steps every time: read a document, validate it, call an API, send a notification. The diagrams looked great. The system in production didn’t. A few well-tested functions would have been easier to build, easier to maintain and a lot easier to trust.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Part of this is just that “<strong>agent</strong>” has become the word everyone reaches for. Sometimes it’s the right call. Sometimes it’s a workflow we already knew how to build, wearing a newer label. An agent earns its complexity when it genuinely has to decide things you can’t predetermine, choosing between tools, adapting to what it finds, working out its own next step. If you already know every step, you have a workflow, and a workflow is usually the better engineering choice. The consolidation didn’t change that. It just made it easier to see.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What building production agents actually taught me</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once I stopped fixating on frameworks, the same three problems kept showing up. None of them had anything to do with the SDK.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Context beats model choice</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Early on I spent a lot of time comparing models, the way you’d agonize over a restaurant menu and then order what you always order. Now I spend most of it thinking about context, which is far less fun and far more useful.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve watched good models fail because they were handed too much, not too little. One team I worked with gave the model access to nearly every internal document they had on the theory that more information meant better answers. It went the other way. Responses got slower, less consistent and sometimes skipped right past the thing that actually mattered. When we cut the context down to only what the task needed, the quality jumped almost immediately. I didn’t predict that. It taught me to be suspicious of “just give it everything.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The best agent systems I’ve worked on weren’t the ones with the biggest context windows. They were the ones careful about what reached the model, and when. That’s not something the framework hands you.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Failure is where the real work is</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most agent demos look great because they’re built around the happy path. Production doesn’t extend that courtesy.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I remember a project where everything held up in testing. Then a downstream API timed out after the agent had already completed several earlier steps. We couldn’t just restart, because part of the business process had already gone through. We ended up spending far more time on recovery logic than we ever spent on prompts. That project changed how I think about this work. The hard part was never getting the model to make a decision. It was making sure the system didn’t fall apart when reality refused to follow the script.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Tool calls fail partway through. APIs return inconsistent data. Models call the same tool over and over because the last answer wasn’t what they wanted. That’s not the exception; that’s a normal Tuesday. Whether you retry, roll back, pause for a human or push on with partial results is a judgment call, and no framework is going to make it for you.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Identity is the real security boundary</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This one surprised me most. The moment an agent stops being a chatbot and starts touching real business systems, identity matters more than orchestration.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Every project gets to the same question eventually. Who is this agent actually acting as? The developer’s credentials? A service account? The user who asked? Get it wrong and you’ve built something autonomous running with more access than any single person should have, which is exactly the kind of thing that looks fine until an audit. The Agent Framework, like most modern tooling, makes it easier to wire agents to tools through standards like the <a href="https://modelcontextprotocol.io/">Model Context Protocol</a>. That helps. But where human approval belongs, what needs extra authorization, how much rope to give the thing, those are still yours to decide.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">The surprises weren’t technical</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Here’s what I didn’t see coming. The hardest part of last year wasn’t technical at all. It was organizational. The moment a team heard “agent,” expectations shifted under everyone’s feet. Business stakeholders started expecting full autonomy. Developers assumed the thing could reason its way through anything. People started designing for flexibility before we’d even agreed on what problem we were solving. The word did damage before any code did. I found myself spending as much time resetting expectations as I did discussing architecture.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Build for change, not for today’s winner</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I don’t think the teams that struggled last year picked the wrong framework. Semantic Kernel was reasonable. AutoGen was reasonable. Foundry made sense for plenty of cases. I’d have signed off on any of them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The ones that got hurt put all their eggs in one framework, treating it as the foundation of the whole system instead of as one more dependency. Microsoft provided a migration path. But teams that had tightly coupled their applications to framework-specific abstractions discovered that migrating and rewriting are not the same thing. That wasn’t Microsoft’s doing. It was their own architecture’s. The teams that moved easily had kept their business logic, prompts and orchestration loose enough to evolve independently of any one SDK. For them, the change was a manageable project, not a teardown.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For what it’s worth, nobody I work with is treating this as an emergency. Most are moving the smaller workloads first, watching how they behave and leaving the production-critical systems alone until they actually understand the new abstractions. That’s the right instinct. And I doubt this is the last consolidation we’ll see, the ecosystem is still young, frameworks will keep absorbing each other and over time the differences between them will be operational more than architectural.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I don’t regret the framework debates, honestly. They were reasonable at the time. What changed wasn’t Microsoft’s roadmap.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It was mine. Watching these systems run in production taught me that the framework is the easiest piece to swap out. Recovery logic, context management, security boundaries, the business workflow itself, those stay with you long after today’s SDK gets replaced by tomorrow’s.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So, Microsoft made one decision easier by turning three frameworks into one. Good. Five years from now we’ll be on different tools, and we’ll still be asking the same handful of questions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Does this actually need an agent? Does it have the right context? Can it recover when something breaks, because something will? Is it acting as the right person?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Those questions outlast every rewrite. That’s where I’ve learned to put my effort.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Frameworks come and go. Good architecture has to survive all of them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.infoworld.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Sponsor mismatch is the silent killer of enterprise transformation]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Late in a large enterprise SAP transformation, the strategic governance conversations began to drift. Instead of executive decisions, we found ourselves debating whether the program needed dedicated testing, whether cutover required a full weekend, whether twenty Agile teams really needed coordin...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3691067/it-nachrichten/sponsor-mismatch-is-the-silent-killer-of-enterprise-transformation/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3691067/it-nachrichten/sponsor-mismatch-is-the-silent-killer-of-enterprise-transformation/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 11:03:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Late in a large enterprise SAP transformation, the strategic governance conversations began to drift. Instead of executive decisions, we found ourselves debating whether the program needed dedicated testing, whether cutover required a full weekend, whether twenty Agile teams really needed coordination support and whether offshore resources were adding value at all.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The questions were not coming from the delivery teams. They were coming from the executive sponsor.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The sponsor had recently been elevated into a senior leadership role and had never sponsored a technology transformation at this scale. The challenge was not authority. The sponsor had every right to ask any question they wanted. The challenge was that strategic governance had quietly turned into a debate about delivery practices, because the sponsor did not yet have the transformation context to focus the conversation anywhere else.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is not a story about a bad sponsor. The executive in this case was a capable senior leader with strong judgment and authentic intent. They had been placed into a role they had not yet been prepared for, and the pattern that followed was structural, not personal. It is one of the more common patterns I have observed across enterprise transformation programs, and one of the most consistently misdiagnosed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Most program failures are not execution failures. They are sponsor mismatches.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">When governance becomes a debate about delivery practices</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When the sponsor does not understand what an enterprise transformation actually requires, governance forums stop functioning as decision bodies and start functioning as practice debates.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">You see it in the questions that get asked. Why do we need a dedicated testing phase? Can the Build timeline be compressed? Why does cutover need a full weekend? Why do we need more Scrum Masters across 20 product teams? Can the US team simply work longer hours instead of using offshore resources? On one program, the sponsor suggested shifting the entire project’s working hours to India time, despite roughly 85 percent of the delivery organization being based in the United States.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">None of these questions are unreasonable in isolation. Each one targets a real cost or timeline pressure. The problem is what is missing underneath them: an understanding of the operational risks the original choices were designed to mitigate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When sponsors ask delivery-practice questions without that context, the program leadership team ends up defending the work instead of advancing it. Decision velocity drops. Trust between the program and its sponsor erodes. Senior delivery talent disengages from governance forums where the conversation never reaches the decisions they need made. What looks from the outside like an active sponsor producing engagement is, from inside the program, an active drain on the cycles needed to deliver.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The compounding cost is not unique to any single program. <a href="https://www.pmi.org/blog/why-executive-sponsorship-fuels-projects">PMI’s research on executive sponsorship</a> consistently identifies sponsor engagement quality, rather than sponsor presence alone, as one of the strongest predictors of project success. The visible symptom is debate. The actual cost is unmade decisions.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Authority is rarely the issue. Literacy is</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When transformations stall under a mismatched sponsor, the diagnostic instinct is to question the sponsor’s authority. Are they senior enough? Do they have the cross-functional reach? Can they unblock?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In most of the programs I have led or advised, authority was not the limiting factor. The sponsor in the SAP program above had ample authority. They could unblock any decision the program needed. What had not been developed was the transformation literacy to know which decisions mattered, which were technical noise and which were execution risks that should not be optimized away.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is what I have come to think of as the literacy problem. Sponsors elevated into transformation roles often have deep functional expertise (finance, operations, business unit leadership) but limited exposure to the distinct functions of PMO, organizational change management, agile delivery, testing and cutover, and how each one reduces a specific category of implementation risk. They are not expected to be SAP configuration experts. But they need enough transformation literacy to recognize which questions actually belong in a steering committee.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://hbr.org/2015/05/how-to-be-an-effective-executive-sponsor">Harvard Business Review’s research on effective executive sponsorship</a> has emphasized that sponsorship effectiveness depends as much on judgment as on authority. Judgment is where literacy becomes operational. A sponsor with authority but limited transformation literacy will optimize for speed and cost in ways that consistently underestimate risk. A sponsor with both will make the tradeoffs the program actually needs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.prosci.com/resources/articles/change-management-best-practices">Prosci’s longstanding benchmark studies on change management</a> have ranked active and visible executive sponsorship as the single greatest contributor to change success for two decades. The word that matters in that finding is active. Active sponsorship without transformation literacy can introduce real cost. Not because the sponsor is acting against the program, but because the optimization choices they make are based on incomplete information about what the program is built to protect against.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Shift the conversation from delivery practices to business risk</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When the sponsor relationship is already in place and cannot be changed, the program leadership team has one move that consistently works: shift the conversation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the SAP program above, we stopped explaining why the testing phase existed. We started explaining the business risk of reducing it. We stopped debating the number of Scrum Masters. We started connecting delivery capacity to coordination across more than twenty Agile teams and the business cost of losing that coordination. We reframed offshore support as a way to maintain delivery momentum around the clock rather than asking the U.S. team to sustain fifteen-hour days.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The shift is from defending delivery practice to explaining business risk. The sponsor does not need to understand why testing takes the time it does. They need to understand what the program is exposed to if testing is compressed. They do not need to know how many Scrum Masters are statistically optimal for twenty Agile teams. They need to know what coordination breaks when the number is wrong.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This reframing accomplishes two things. First, it brings the conversation back to the level at which sponsors actually make decisions: tradeoffs between business outcomes and business risks. Second, it builds transformation literacy in the sponsor over time, almost as a byproduct. By the third or fourth iteration of business-risk-framed conversations, the sponsor begins to ask the right questions on their own.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In practice, this happens through small but deliberate moves. When the sponsor asks why a phase needs the time it takes, the program lead names two or three things that could go wrong if the time is cut and what each would cost the business. When the sponsor asks why a role is needed, the program lead names the work that would not get done without it. Every delivery-practice question gets converted into a business-risk answer.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The program leadership team’s job is not to make the sponsor an expert in SAP delivery. It is to provide enough transformation context so that executive decisions reflect both business priorities and implementation realities.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are a few phrases I have used with executive sponsors over the years that capture the underlying issue. The sharpest one:</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">If the decision has to go above the sponsor, they are not the sponsor.</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Sponsorship is defined by what the sponsor can decide without asking someone else. That is the test. Anything else is the appearance of sponsorship, not the substance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For CIOs supporting enterprise transformation, the implication is direct. Sponsor selection, or sponsor preparation when selection is not an option, is not a hierarchy question. It is a transformation capability question. The same execution discipline that goes into defining decision rights, structuring governance and protecting delivery momentum should apply, with equal rigor, to assessing sponsor fit and building sponsor literacy before the program begins.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A sponsor does not need to be the technical expert. They do need to know when to trust the people who are.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Mit dem zweiten Chrome-Update der Woche schließt Google weitere Browser-Lücken]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[In den neuen Chrome-Versionen 150.0.7871.186/187 für Windows und macOS sowie 150.0.7871.186 für Linux vom 23. Juli haben die Entwickler vier Schwachstellen beseitigt. Keine der geschlossenen Lücken wird laut Google bislang für Angriffe ausgenutzt. Diese Aktualisierung folgt nur zwei Tage nach dem...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690961/it-nachrichten/mit-dem-zweiten-chrome-update-der-woche-schliesst-google-weitere-browser-luecken/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690961/it-nachrichten/mit-dem-zweiten-chrome-update-der-woche-schliesst-google-weitere-browser-luecken/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 10:04:07 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>In den neuen Chrome-Versionen 150.0.7871.186/187 für Windows und macOS sowie 150.0.7871.186 für Linux vom 23. Juli haben die Entwickler vier Schwachstellen beseitigt. Keine der geschlossenen Lücken wird laut Google bislang für Angriffe ausgenutzt. Diese Aktualisierung folgt nur zwei Tage nach dem vorherigen Chrome-Update. Die Hersteller anderer Chromium-basierter Browser werden in Kürze nachziehen.</p>



<p>Im <a href="https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Chrome Release Blog</a> führt Daniel Yip vier beseitigte Sicherheitslücken auf, die Google alle selbst entdeckt hat. Die Schwachstellen CVE-2026-16804 bis -16807 sind als hohes Risiko ausgewiesen. Drei der vier Anfälligkeiten sind Use-after-free-Lücken (UAF) in verschiedenen Komponenten, namentlich Input, Blink und WebMCP (Web Model Context Protocol, eine Schnittstelle für „KI“-Agenten). Das Problem bei CVE-2026-16807 ist hingegen ein unzulässiger Schreibzugriff auf Speicherbereiche außerhalb der vorgesehenen Grenzen (out of bounds write) in der Codecs-Komponente.</p>



<p><a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/1197811/die-neuesten-sicherheits-updates.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">▶Die neuesten Sicherheits-Updates</a></p>



<p>Erst am 21. Juli hat Google ein Update bereitgestellt und damit <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3196305/google-behebt-hochriskante-schwachstellen-in-chrome.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3196305/google-behebt-hochriskante-schwachstellen-in-chrome.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">12 Sicherheitslücken geschlossen</a>. In aller Regel aktualisiert sich Chrome automatisch, wenn eine neue Version verfügbar ist. Mit dem Menü-Eintrag <em>» Hilfe » Über Google Chrome</em> können Sie die Update-Prüfung manuell anstoßen.</p>



<p>Google hat am 23. Juli auch Chrome für Android 150.0.7871.181 veröffentlicht. In der Android-Version sind die gleichen Schwachstellen beseitigt wie in den Desktop-Ausgaben. Der Extended Stable Channel für Windows und macOS enthält nun die Chromium-Version 150.0.7871.187. Die Freigabe der Chrome-Version 151 ist für den 28. Juli geplant.</p>



<p><strong>Tipp:</strong> Unabhängig davon, dass Sie Ihren Browser stets aktuell halten, sollten Sie die Sicherheit Ihres PCs zusätzlich mit geeigneter Antivirus-Software verbessern. Gute Antivirus-Lösungen stellen wir in „<a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2255713/test-bestes-antivirus-programm-windows.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Die besten Antivirus-Programme im Test: So schützen Sie Ihren Windows-PC</a>“ vor. Falls Sie großen Wert auf anonymes Surfen legen, <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/1193534/die-besten-vpn-dienste-im-vergleich.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">sind wiederum gute VPN-Programme einen Blick wert.</a></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading toc">Andere Chromium-basierte Browser</h2>



<p>Die Hersteller anderer auf Chromium basierender Browser sind nun wieder gefordert, mit Updates nachzuziehen. Microsoft Edge, Brave und Vivaldi sind auf dem Sicherheitsstand vor dem zweiten Chrome-Update dieser Woche. Opera hat zwar am 23. Juli ein Bugfix-Update veröffentlicht, ist jedoch mit seiner Browser-Version 133 in puncto Sicherheit weiterhin auf einem Holzweg unterwegs. Darin ist die veraltete Chromium-Ausgabe 149.0.7827.201 vom 25. Juni verbaut und für Chromium 149 liefert Google seitdem keine Updates mehr.</p>



<div class="wp-block-group"><div class="wp-block-group__inner-container is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained">
<p><strong>Chromium-basierte Browser in der Übersicht:</strong></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table is-style-stripes"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><thead><tr><th><strong>Browser</strong></th><th>Version</th><th>Chromium-Version</th><th>abgesichert?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/1135017/google-chrome.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" title="Download">Google Chrome ↓</a></td><td>150.0.7871.182</td><td>150.0.7871.182</td><td>🟢</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/1191500/brave-browser.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" title="Download">Brave ↓</a></td><td>1.92.143</td><td>150.0.7871.182</td><td>🟡</td></tr><tr><td>Microsoft Edge</td><td>150.0.4078.96</td><td>150.0.7871.182</td><td>🟡</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/1082991/browser-opera.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" title="Download">Opera One ↓</a></td><td>133.0.5932.85</td><td>149.0.7827.201</td><td>🟠</td></tr><tr><td><a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/1151272/vivaldi.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" title="Download">Vivaldi ↓</a></td><td>8.1.4087.56 </td><td>150.0.7871.186</td><td>🟡</td></tr></tbody></table><figcaption class="wp-element-caption"><em>Chromium-basierte Browser – Stand: 23.07.2026</em></figcaption></figure>
</div></div>

</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[13 clevere USB-C-Gadgets, die viel mehr können, als nur Ihr Handy aufzuladen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ich weiß nicht, wie es in Ihren Schubladen aussieht, aber meine sind voll mit Kabeln, die ich wahrscheinlich nie wieder benutzen werde, weil die Technologie sich ziemlich weiterentwickelt hat. Zum Glück scheint sich USB-C durchzusetzen, denn es gibt keinen falschen Weg, diese Dinger anzuschließen...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690951/it-nachrichten/13-clevere-usb-c-gadgets-die-viel-mehr-koennen-als-nur-ihr-handy-aufzuladen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690951/it-nachrichten/13-clevere-usb-c-gadgets-die-viel-mehr-koennen-als-nur-ihr-handy-aufzuladen/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 10:03:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Ich weiß nicht, wie es in Ihren Schubladen aussieht, aber meine sind voll mit Kabeln, die ich wahrscheinlich nie wieder benutzen werde, weil die Technologie sich ziemlich weiterentwickelt hat. Zum Glück scheint sich USB-C durchzusetzen, denn es gibt keinen falschen Weg, diese Dinger anzuschließen. Aber nicht nur Smartphones, Tablets und Laptops verwenden diese Anschlüsse, sondern auch eine lange Liste von Gadgets.</p>



<p>Wir haben den Markt nach versteckten Perlen durchforstet: Gadgets, bei denen Sie denken werden: “Wow, ich wusste gar nicht, dass ich das brauche, aber es wird mein Leben so viel einfacher machen!” Schauen wir uns also an, mit welchen coolen Geräten Sie Ihre Typ-C-Kabel und -Anschlüsse nutzen können.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">heat it Insektenstichheiler</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a631c2b7d445"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-full wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/PC-Welt-Aufmacher-57.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all" alt="heat it - Insektenstichheiler für dein Smartphone - Chemiefreie Behandlung von Juckreiz &amp; Schmerz mit konzentrierter Wärme - für Android mit USB-C (nicht für iPhone 15 geeignet) Amazon Angebot" class="wp-image-2376376" width="1200" height="800" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure><p class="imageCredit">PCWelt/heat it/Amazon</p></div>



<p>Wer im Sommer oder Urlaub oft von Mücken geradezu heimgesucht wird, wird sich besonders über dieses geniale Gadget freuen: Dieses winzige Gerät, das sich einfach per USB-C mit Ihrem Smartphone verbinden lässt, kann mit gezielter Wärme den Juckreiz von Stichen und Insektenbissen deutlich reduzieren.</p>



<p>Ähnlich wie größere Varianten, etwa diesen hier <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2420282/beurer-insektenstichheiler-br-90-im-test-rasche-hilfe-gegen-juckreiz.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">von Beurer</a>, muss man den kleinen <a href="https://www.amazon.de/dp/B0D26GWWD1?th=1&amp;tag=pcwelt.de-21&amp;ascsubtag=rss" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Stichheiler von heat it</a> einfach nur per App aufladen und dann auf den Stich halten. Die Hitze erledigt dann den Rest und zersetzt die Proteine, die im Mückenstich dafür sorgen, dass die Stelle anschwillt, juckt und schmerzt. Ein echtes Must-have für den Sommer, und es kostet nicht mal 25 Euro.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Mini-Ventilator</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a631c2b7e317"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-full is-resized wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/KIMMOO-3-in-1-Turbo-Handventilator.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all" alt="KIMMOO 3-in-1 Turbo-Handventilator" class="wp-image-3198532" width="1048" height="916" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure><p class="imageCredit">KIMMOO / Amazon / PC-WELT</p></div>



<p>Ziemlich genial sind auch diese kleinen Ventilatoren, die man im Sommer einfach in der Hosentasche mitnehmen und bei Bedarf schnell einsetzen kann. Wer schon einmal bei 30 Grad in einer vollen S-Bahn saß und sich zumindest ein wenig frische Luft gewünscht hat, der wird dieses Gadget lieben.</p>



<p>Der <a href="https://www.amazon.de/KIMMOO-Tragbarer-1-Turbo-Ventilator-USB-wiederaufladbarer-Mini-Handventilator/dp/B0DRNQKTH9?tag=pcwelt.de-21&amp;ascsubtag=rss" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mini-Ventilator für unter 20 Euro</a> mit USB-C-Ladeanschluss kann ganz einfach über <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/1167895/vergleich-die-besten-powerbanks-im-test-4500-bis-30000-mah.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Powerbanks</a>, Computer, Laptops oder USB-Ladegeräte betrieben werden. Es gibt aber noch kleinere und günstigere <a href="https://www.amazon.de/Mini-Handy-Fan-Handy-Fan-Taschen-Fan-Reise-Ventilatoren-Smartphone-Tablet-Typ-C-Schnitts-Wei%C3%9F/dp/B0BVMZBVD6/?tag=pcwelt.de-21&amp;ascsubtag=rss" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ventilatoren</a>, die man direkt ans Handy anschließen kann, und gerade mal 2-3 Euro pro Stück kosten. Diese sorgen aber auch für einen weniger starken Luftstrom, daher würden wir eher die erste Variante empfehlen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">USB-C zu HDMI Adapter</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a631c2b7f001"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Anker-USBC-to-HDMI-adapter.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1200" alt="Anker USB-C to HDMI adapter" class="wp-image-2905503" width="1200" height="675" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure><p class="imageCredit">Anker</p></div>



<p>Wenn Ihr Laptop über einen USB-C-Anschluss verfügt, Sie Ihren Monitor aber schon seit Ewigkeiten nicht mehr geupgradet haben, verfügt Ihr Bildschirm vermutlich nicht über einen Typ-C-Anschluss. Dieser <a href="https://www.amazon.de/dp/B07THJGZ9Z?tag=pcwelt.de-21&amp;ascsubtag=rss" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Adapter von Anker</a> löst dieses Problem für Sie, sodass Sie das normale HDMI-Kabel, das Sie an Ihren Monitor anschließen, mit diesem Gerät verbinden können.</p>



<p>Der Adapter unterstützt Auflösungen von bis zu 4K bei 60 Hz, was ziemlich beeindruckend ist. Dies ist auch eine raffinierte Möglichkeit, Ihr Smartphone oder Tablet an Ihren Monitor oder Fernseher anzuschließen. Das Gerät kostet circa 13 Euro, aber wir haben es schon für nur 13 Euro bei Amazon gesehen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Mini-Schraubendreher</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a631c2b80071"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/image_41cdff.png?w=1200" alt="USB C Mini Schraubendreher" class="wp-image-2906096" width="1200" height="1126" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure><p class="imageCredit">Amazon</p></div>



<p>Wenn Sie häufig an Ihrem Computer oder anderen Geräten herumschrauben müssen, ist dieser <a href="https://www.amazon.de/Mini-Elektrisch-Schraubendreher-Set-Screwdriver/dp/B0D47CS4TD/?tag=pcwelt.de-21&amp;ascsubtag=rss" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">elektrische Mini-Schraubendreher</a> vielleicht genau das Richtige für Sie. Dieser stiftförmige Schraubendreher verfügt über vier LED-Leuchten, damit Sie besser sehen können, woran Sie gerade arbeiten, und dreht sich 200 Mal pro Minute, sodass Sie die Arbeit schneller erledigen können.</p>



<p>Der Schraubendreher verfügt über 64 verschiedene Aufsätze, es sollte also für so gut wie jeden Einsatzzweck ein passender dabei sein. Er kann über USB-C aufgeladen werden und hält bis zu drei Stunden lang. Der Elektroschraubendreher kostet normalerweise 41 Euro, ist aber auch für 32 Euro im Angebot erhältlich.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">USB-C microSD-Kartenleser</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a631c2b80af6"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-full wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/image_491207.png" alt="USB C microSD Kartenleser Ugreen" class="wp-image-2858705" width="1135" height="1009" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure><p class="imageCredit">Ugreen / Amazon</p></div>



<p>Die meisten Laptops verfügen heutzutage nicht mehr über einen Kartenleser, daher muss man andere Wege finden, um Daten von diesen kleinen Dingern zu übertragen. Egal, ob Sie Daten von der Karte Ihrer Dashcam oder Ihrer Kamera übertragen möchten, dieser winzige <a href="https://www.amazon.de/UGREEN-Kartenleser-Aluminium-Kartenleseger%C3%A4t-kompatibel/dp/B08CS8T8DC/?tag=pcwelt.de-21&amp;ascsubtag=rss" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ugreen USB-C microSD-Kartenleser</a> ist dafür bestens geeignet.</p>



<p>Der Kartenleser ist so klein, dass Sie ihn wahrscheinlich an einem Schlüsselbund befestigen können. Wenn Sie eine etwas vielseitigere Version bevorzugen, bietet <a href="https://www.amazon.de/dp/B07D1J88CF?tag=pcwelt.de-21&amp;ascsubtag=rss" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ugreen ein Modell an, das auch mit SD-Karten kompatibel ist</a> und sowohl über USB-C- als auch USB-A-Anschlüsse verfügt. Alle diese Modelle kosten weniger als 10 Euro und sind daher eine lohnende Investition.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Anker Nano Power Bank</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a631c2b818ab"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-large wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Anker-Nano-Powerbank-5000mAh.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1200" alt="Anker Nano Powerbank, 5000mAh" class="wp-image-2640989" width="1200" height="1200" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure><p class="imageCredit">Anker </p></div>



<p>Eine Sache, die Sie unbedingt in Ihrer Tasche, Reisetasche oder in Ihrem Rucksack haben müssen, ist eine <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/1167895/vergleich-die-besten-powerbanks-im-test-4500-bis-30000-mah.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Powerbank</a>. Denn man weiß schließlich nie, wann das Telefon einen mal im Stich lässt und nach einer Aufladung schreit. Die <a href="https://www.amazon.de/Anker-Powerbank-Integrierter-Faltbarer-Kompatibel/dp/B0C6XK77HJ/?tag=pcwelt.de-21&amp;ascsubtag=rss" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Anker Nano Power Bank</a> ist zum Glück so klein, dass sie fast überall hinpasst.</p>



<p>Sie verfügt über einen faltbaren USB-C-Anschluss und einen Anschluss an der Seite, sodass Sie bei Bedarf zwei Geräte gleichzeitig aufladen können. Die Kapazität von 5.000 mAh reicht gerade aus, um Ihr Handy einmal vollständig aufzuladen, was in der Not entscheidend sein kann. Außerdem kostet sie gerade mal 26 Euro, ist aber immer wieder mal reduziert.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Endoskopkamera mit Licht</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a631c2b825b1"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-large wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Endoscope-Camera-with-Light.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1200" alt="Ennovor Endoscope camera " class="wp-image-2779926" width="1200" height="750" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure><p class="imageCredit">Ennovor</p></div>



<p>Auch wenn Sie diese <a href="https://www.amazon.de/Endoskopkamera-Ennovor-Wasserdicht-Inspektionskamera-Rohrkamera/dp/B0DFM6RFHR/?tag=pcwelt.de-21&amp;ascsubtag=rss" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Endoskopkamera von Ennovor</a> nicht jeden Tag benutzen werden, kann sie doch sehr nützlich sein. Sie schließen sie einfach an Ihr Telefon an, installieren eine App und sehen alles, was Ihre Kamera macht. <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2771668/dieses-geniale-tool-kostet-weniger-als-19-euro-und-erleichtert-mir-jede-woche-das-leben.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mein Kollege schwört darauf</a> und verwendet sie, um alles zu finden, was so hinter dem Schreibtisch verloren geht.</p>



<p>Gerade dann, wenn Sie am Auto arbeiten oder nach undichten Leitungen suchen, ist das Teil super nützlich. Da sie die Schutzklasse IP67 hat, können Sie sie sogar in Ihr Aquarium stellen. Die Kamera wird mit einem circa 5 Meter langen, halbstarren Kabel und diversem Zubehör geliefert, darunter ein Haken, ein Magnet und ein Spiegel. Sie können diese Kamera im Moment für um die 22 Euro kaufen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Blukar Taschenlampe</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a631c2b8336b"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-full wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Blukar-flash-light.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all" alt="Blukar rechargeable flashlight" class="wp-image-2779875" width="1045" height="653" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure><p class="imageCredit">Blukar</p></div>



<p>Egal, wer Sie sind oder wo Sie so unterwegs sind: Sie brauchen eine Taschenlampe. Je kleiner, desto besser, denn so können Sie sie in jede Tasche stecken. <a href="https://www.amazon.de/Blukar-Taschenlampe-Superhelle-Betriebsdauer-Wasserdichte/dp/B0B42R2GKP/?tag=pcwelt.de-21&amp;ascsubtag=rss" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dieses Modell von Blukar</a> verfügt über einen eingebauten 1800mAh-Akku, den Sie mit einem der vielen Typ-C-Kabel aufladen, die Sie so herumliegen haben.</p>



<p>Mit einer einzigen Ladung können Sie bis zu 16 Stunden arbeiten, was ziemlich gut ist. Sie können zwischen vier verschiedenen Blitzmodi wählen, darunter auch einer, der Ihnen hilft, Hilfe zu signalisieren. Außerdem kostet die kleine Taschenlampe weniger als 10 Euro. Es gibt also keine Ausrede, sich diesen Tipp entgehen zu lassen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Samsung Flash-Laufwerk</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a631c2b83f55"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-large wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Samsung-USB-Type-C-flash-drive-product-promo.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1200" alt="Samsung USB Type-C flash drive product promo" class="wp-image-2441089" width="1200" height="800" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure><p class="imageCredit">Samsung</p></div>



<p>Die allermeisten Flash-Laufwerke haben einen USB-A-Anschluss, aber <a href="https://www.amazon.de/Samsung-Type-CTM-Flash-MUF-256DA-APC/dp/B09R2CF1K2/?tag=pcwelt.de-21&amp;ascsubtag=rss" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dieses von Samsung</a> besitzt einen Typ-C-Anschluss. Mit Übertragungsgeschwindigkeiten von bis zu 400 MB/s können Sie Dateien im Handumdrehen verschieben. Das Coole an diesem USB-Stick ist, dass Sie ihn sogar in Ihr Smartphone stecken können, um 4K-Videos direkt darauf aufzunehmen.</p>



<p>Das Samsung Type-C Flash-Laufwerk ist in verschiedenen Speicheroptionen erhältlich, angefangen bei 64 GB bis hin zu 512 GB.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Mini Luftpumpe</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a631c2b84b10"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-full wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/PC-Welt-Aufmacher-60.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all" alt="CYCPLUS Luftpumpe I50PSI Elektrischer Kompressor Tragbar Fahrradpumpe Mini Reifenpumpe mit Digital LED Anzeige LED Licht Wiederaufladbarer Li-ionen 12V für alle Fahrräder Motorräder und Autos Amazon Angebot" class="wp-image-2377338" width="1200" height="800" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure><p class="imageCredit">PCWelt/Cycplus/Amazon</p></div>



<p>Ebenfalls perfekt für den Sommer geeignet ist diese <a href="https://www.amazon.de/dp/B08QMJSHDG?th=1&amp;tag=pcwelt.de-21&amp;ascsubtag=rss" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">kleine Luftpumpe von Cycplus</a>, die unterwegs in jede Tasche passt. Sie kann nicht nur einen Fahrradreifen innerhalb von zwei Minuten auf Knopfdruck wieder aufpumpen, sondern wird auch per USB aufgeladen. Sie eignet sich laut Hersteller für Mountainbikes, Rennräder, Motorräder und sogar Autos!</p>



<p>Neben der Luftpumpe selbst lässt sich dieses praktische Gadget auch als Taschenlampe oder Powerbank für unterwegs einsetzen. Alles Dinge, die man auf einer Fahrradtour sehr gut gebrauchen kann. Und für den Preis von nur 45,99 Euro wirklich empfehlenswert, wenn Sie schnelle Hilfe bei platten Reifen benötigen. Im Angebot kostet sie sogar nur 37 Euro.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Leselampe mit Buchklemme</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a631c2b85712"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-large wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/image_92cd0c.png?w=1200" alt="" class="wp-image-2796038" width="1200" height="1200" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure><p class="imageCredit">Gritin / Amazon</p></div>



<p>Wer auch gerne und viel liest, und das teilweise bis spät in die Nacht hinein, wird sich über dieses kleine Teil hier freuen: eine Leselampe, die Sie einfach an Ihr Buch klemmen können. Das ist jetzt vielleicht nichts bahnbrechend Neues, doch mit insgesamt drei Farbtemperaturen und fünf verschiedenen Lichtmodi können Sie individuell anpassen, wie viel Licht Sie zum Lesen brauchen. </p>



<p>Die <a href="https://www.amazon.de/Gritin-Farbtemperatur-Helligkeit-Wiederaufladbare-Klemmlampe/dp/B0CBPL4RKH?tag=pcwelt.de-21&amp;ascsubtag=rss" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Leselampe von Gritin</a> kostet bei Amazon gerade mal 13 Euro und besitzt einen 1200-mAh-Akku, der je nach Nutzung bis zu 80 Stunden durchhält. Danach können Sie ihn einfach per USB wieder aufladen. Den Hals der Lampe können Sie nach Belieben hin- und herschwenken, und es gibt sogar eine kleine Ladeanzeige. Was will man mehr?</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Externes DVD-Laufwerk</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a631c2b86613"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Amicool-external-CD-DVD-drive-deal.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all&amp;w=1200" alt="Amicool external CD DVD drive deal" class="wp-image-2864860" width="1200" height="675" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure><p class="imageCredit">Amicool</p></div>



<p>Wenn Ihr Laptop wie viele heutzutage kein DVD-Laufwerk besitzt, dann wird Ihnen dieses kleine Gerät sehr nützlich sein. Dieses <a href="https://www.amazon.de/dp/B07V67STBD?tag=pcwelt.de-21&amp;ascsubtag=rss" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">externe DVD-Laufwerk von Amicool </a>wird über USB-C (oder USB-A) an Ihren Laptop angeschlossen und bietet Ihnen das optische Laufwerk, das Sie manchmal benötigen.</p>



<p>Es kann DVDs und CDs problemlos lesen und brennen, sodass Sie Software installieren, Dateien kopieren, Daten sichern, Spiele spielen und vieles mehr können. Sie müssen nicht einmal Treiber installieren, da dieses Gerät Plug-and-Play-fähig ist. Normalerweise kostet es 28 Euro, aber oft ist es schon für etwa 20 Euro zu haben, was ein absolutes Schnäppchen ist.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Wiederaufladbare Handwärmer</h2>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a631c2b87298"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-full wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Handwarmer_USBC_Gadget.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all" alt="Handwärmer USB Gadget" class="wp-image-3198531" width="1097" height="930" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure><p class="imageCredit">Amazon / PC-WELT </p></div>



<p>Wenn es langsam wieder kälter wird, wünscht man sich oft nichts sehnlicher, als seine Hände etwas schneller aufwärmen zu können. Das geht natürlich auch mit Handschuhen oder einer Tasse Tee, doch <a href="https://www.amazon.de/Handw%C3%A4rmer-wiederaufladbar-elektrische-Taschenheizung-W%C3%A4rme-Therapie/dp/B0CJYBXMXH?tag=pcwelt.de-21&amp;ascsubtag=rss" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">diese Handwärmer für 20 Euro</a> sind nicht nur wiederaufladbar, sondern halten Ihre Finger mit einer einzigen Ladung auch bis zu 24 Stunden lang warm.</p>



<p>Die beiden Gadgets verfügen über einen Temperatursensor-Chip, mit dem Sie eine von drei Temperaturen für eine präzise Steuerung auswählen können. Außerdem stehen verschiedene Farben zur Auswahl, wodurch sie sich auch bestens als Geschenk eignen.</p>

</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-8223 | Open5GS up to 2.7.7 sm-policies Endpoint pcf_sess_sbi_discover_and_send denial of service (Issue 4438)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in Open5GS up to 2.7.7. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function pcf_sess_sbi_discover_and_send of the component sm-policies Endpoint. Performing a manipulation results in denial of service.

This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690942/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-8223-open5gs-up-to-277-sm-policies-endpoint-pcfsesssbidiscoverandsend-denial-of-service-issue-4438/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690942/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-8223-open5gs-up-to-277-sm-policies-endpoint-pcfsesssbidiscoverandsend-denial-of-service-issue-4438/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:59:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/open5gs">Open5GS up to 2.7.7</a>. It has been rated as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">problematic</a>. Affected by this vulnerability is the function <code>pcf_sess_sbi_discover_and_send</code> of the component <em>sm-policies Endpoint</em>. Performing a manipulation results in denial of service.

This vulnerability is cataloged as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-8223">CVE-2026-8223</a>. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.

The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-8222 | Open5GS up to 2.7.7 sm-policies Endpoint src/pcf/nbsf-handler.c pcf_nbsf_management_handle_register denial of service (Issue 4437)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in Open5GS up to 2.7.7. It has been declared as problematic. Affected is the function pcf_nbsf_management_handle_register of the file src/pcf/nbsf-handler.c of the component sm-policies Endpoint. Such manipulation leads to denial of service.

This vulnerability is listed...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690941/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-8222-open5gs-up-to-277-sm-policies-endpoint-srcpcfnbsf-handlerc-pcfnbsfmanagementhandleregister-denial-of-service-issue-4437/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690941/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-8222-open5gs-up-to-277-sm-policies-endpoint-srcpcfnbsf-handlerc-pcfnbsfmanagementhandleregister-denial-of-service-issue-4437/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:59:11 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/open5gs">Open5GS up to 2.7.7</a>. It has been declared as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">problematic</a>. Affected is the function <code>pcf_nbsf_management_handle_register</code> of the file <em>src/pcf/nbsf-handler.c</em> of the component <em>sm-policies Endpoint</em>. Such manipulation leads to denial of service.

This vulnerability is listed as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-8222">CVE-2026-8222</a>. The attack may be performed from remote. In addition, an exploit is available.

The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-8225 | Open5GS up to 2.7.7 delete Endpoint src/pcf/sm-sm.c pcf_npcf_smpolicycontrol_handle_delete denial of service (Issue 4440)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability identified as problematic has been detected in Open5GS up to 2.7.7. This affects the function pcf_npcf_smpolicycontrol_handle_delete of the file src/pcf/sm-sm.c of the component delete Endpoint. The manipulation leads to denial of service.

This vulnerability is documented as CVE-...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690940/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-8225-open5gs-up-to-277-delete-endpoint-srcpcfsm-smc-pcfnpcfsmpolicycontrolhandledelete-denial-of-service-issue-4440/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690940/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-8225-open5gs-up-to-277-delete-endpoint-srcpcfsm-smc-pcfnpcfsmpolicycontrolhandledelete-denial-of-service-issue-4440/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:59:02 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability identified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">problematic</a> has been detected in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/open5gs">Open5GS up to 2.7.7</a>. This affects the function <code>pcf_npcf_smpolicycontrol_handle_delete</code> of the file <em>src/pcf/sm-sm.c</em> of the component <em>delete Endpoint</em>. The manipulation leads to denial of service.

This vulnerability is documented as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-8225">CVE-2026-8225</a>. The attack can be initiated remotely. Additionally, an exploit exists.

The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[So erklärst du deinen Mitarbeitenden die bAV – ohne dass HR jede Frage selbst beantworten muss]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Beitrag So erklärst du deinen Mitarbeitenden die bAV – ohne dass HR jede Frage selbst beantworten muss erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin BASIC thinking. Über unseren Newsletter UPDATE startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.
Die betriebliche Altersvorsorge gehört zu den wertv...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690926/it-security-nachrichten/so-erklaerst-du-deinen-mitarbeitenden-die-bav-ohne-dass-hr-jede-frage-selbst-beantworten-muss/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690926/it-security-nachrichten/so-erklaerst-du-deinen-mitarbeitenden-die-bav-ohne-dass-hr-jede-frage-selbst-beantworten-muss/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:38:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/so-erklaerst-du-deinen-mitarbeitenden-die-bav/">So erklärst du deinen Mitarbeitenden die bAV – ohne dass HR jede Frage selbst beantworten muss</a> erschien zuerst beim Online-Magazin <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Über <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a> startest du jeden Morgen bestens informiert in den Tag.</p>
<p>Die betriebliche Altersvorsorge gehört zu den wertvollsten Benefits, die ein Arbeitgeber anbieten kann und gleichzeitig zu den am schlechtesten kommunizierten. Viele HR-Teams kennen das Problem: Die bAV ist eingeführt, der Vertrag mit dem Versicherer steht, die Versorgungsordnung liegt im Ordner. Aber die Mitarbeitenden? Die fragen immer noch, was das eigentlich bedeutet, ob sie mitmachen sollen […]</p>
<p>Der Beitrag <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2026/07/24/so-erklaerst-du-deinen-mitarbeitenden-die-bav/">So erklärst du deinen Mitarbeitenden die bAV – ohne dass HR jede Frage selbst beantworten muss</a> erschien zuerst auf <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog">BASIC thinking</a>. Folge uns auch auf <a href="https://news.google.com/publications/CAAqMggKIixDQklTR3dnTWFoY0tGV0poYzJsamRHaHBibXRwYm1jdVpHVXZZbXh2WnlnQVAB" target="_blank">Google News</a> und <a href="https://flipboard.com/@BASICthinking" target="_blank">Flipboard</a> oder abonniere <a href="https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/update/" target="_blank">unseren Newsletter UPDATE</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Detects 7.6 Billion Email Phishing Threats as Teams Vishing Attacks Increases 10-Fold]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Email phishing remains one of the most common ways attackers gain access to business accounts. During the second quarter of 2026, criminals continued to use fake login pages, malicious attachments, and convincing business messages to steal credentials or deliver malware. The problem is no longer ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690922/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-detects-76-billion-email-phishing-threats-as-teams-vishing-attacks-increases-10-fold/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690922/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-detects-76-billion-email-phishing-threats-as-teams-vishing-attacks-increases-10-fold/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:38:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Email phishing remains one of the most common ways attackers gain access to business accounts. During the second quarter of 2026, criminals continued to use fake login pages, malicious attachments, and convincing business messages to steal credentials or deliver malware. The problem is no longer limited to the inbox. Attackers are increasingly using collaboration tools […]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/email-phishing-threats-as-teams-vishing-attacks/">Microsoft Detects 7.6 Billion Email Phishing Threats as Teams Vishing Attacks Increases 10-Fold</a> appeared first on <a href="https://cybersecuritynews.com/">Cyber Security News</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Für die Pixel Watch: Google behebt endlich nerviges Problem]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Pixel Watch-Nutzer*innen beschwerten sich in letzter Zeit über ein nerviges Problem mit Express Pay. Jetzt reagiert Google.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690921/it-nachrichten/fuer-die-pixel-watch-google-behebt-endlich-nerviges-problem/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690921/it-nachrichten/fuer-die-pixel-watch-google-behebt-endlich-nerviges-problem/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:33:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Pixel Watch-Nutzer*innen beschwerten sich in letzter Zeit über ein nerviges Problem mit Express Pay. Jetzt reagiert Google.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Google löst lästiges Pixel-Watch-Problem]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Gute Nachrichten für alle, die ihre Einkäufe gern schnell per Smartwatch erledigen.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690899/it-nachrichten/google-loest-laestiges-pixel-watch-problem/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690899/it-nachrichten/google-loest-laestiges-pixel-watch-problem/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:16:52 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Gute Nachrichten für alle, die ihre Einkäufe gern schnell per Smartwatch erledigen.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Windows 11: LG-Monitore installieren Bloatware - Microsoft reagiert]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Wer einen LG-Monitor an einen Windows-PC anschließt, bekommt teils ungefragt Werbung für Antivirensoftware präsentiert. Nach massiver Kritik und einer Einmischung von Microsoft lenkt LG nun ein. Das eigentliche Problem mit Bloatware bleibt aber bestehen.			(Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690897/it-security-nachrichten/windows-11-lg-monitore-installieren-bloatware-microsoft-reagiert/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690897/it-security-nachrichten/windows-11-lg-monitore-installieren-bloatware-microsoft-reagiert/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 09:10:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/news,160176.html"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="Display, LG, Bildschirm, OLED, Monitor, curved, gebogenes Display, 5K2K, 45GX990A, LG 45GX990A" width="1920" height="1080" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/1920/78419.jpg"></a>
			Wer einen LG-Monitor an einen Windows-PC anschließt, bekommt teils ungefragt Werbung für Antivirensoftware präsentiert. Nach massiver Kritik und einer Einmischung von Microsoft lenkt LG nun ein. Das eigentliche Problem mit Bloatware bleibt aber bestehen.			(<a href="https://winfuture.de/news,160176.html">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Paket abgeben, günstig tanken: Amazon startet Tankrabatt für Retouren]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ein neuer Deal verknüpft Amazon-Retouren mit einem Tankrabatt an Zapfsäulen von Eni und Agip. Fünf Cent pro Liter Benzin oder Diesel klingen zunächst verlockend für jeden Autofahrer. Doch ab wann rechnet sich der bewusste Umweg zur Zapfsäule wirklich?			(Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690816/it-security-nachrichten/paket-abgeben-guenstig-tanken-amazon-startet-tankrabatt-fuer-retouren/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690816/it-security-nachrichten/paket-abgeben-guenstig-tanken-amazon-startet-tankrabatt-fuer-retouren/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:26:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/news,160173.html"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="Amazon, shopping, E-Commerce, Logistik, Versandhandel, Paket, Pakete, Box, Paketdienst, Rückgabe, Tankstelle, Zapfsäule, Rücksendung, Retouren, Tankstellen, Retoure, Tankrabatt" width="1920" height="1080" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/1920/92276.jpg"></a>
			Ein neuer Deal verknüpft <a href="https://winfuture.de/special/amazon/" title="Amazon Special">Amazon-Retouren</a> mit einem Tankrabatt an Zapfsäulen von Eni und Agip. Fünf Cent pro Liter Benzin oder Diesel klingen zunächst verlockend für jeden Autofahrer. Doch ab wann rechnet sich der bewusste Umweg zur Zapfsäule wirklich?			(<a href="https://winfuture.de/news,160173.html">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Aktuelle Technik-Blitzangebote von Amazon im Überblick 24. Juli]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Täglich bieten Amazon und andere Händler zahlreiche Produkte für eine begrenzte Zeit preisgesenkt an. Wir haben uns die heutigen Technik-Angebote angeschaut und ziehen den Vergleich zum Straßenpreis. Ob es sich also wirklich um ein Schnäppchen handelt, erfahrt ihr hier.			(Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690739/it-security-nachrichten/aktuelle-technik-blitzangebote-von-amazon-im-ueberblick-24-juli/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690739/it-security-nachrichten/aktuelle-technik-blitzangebote-von-amazon-im-ueberblick-24-juli/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 07:14:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/amazon/angebote/#1784869740"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="Amazon, Schnäppchen, Rabattaktion, Deals, sale, Angebote, Sonderangebote, Angebot, shopping, Rabatt, Flash, Deal, Blitzangebote, Blitz, Nachlass, Amazon Logo, Amazon.de" width="1920" height="1080" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/1920/42128.jpg"></a>
			Täglich bieten Amazon und andere Händler zahlreiche Produkte für eine begrenzte Zeit preisgesenkt an. Wir haben uns die heutigen Technik-Angebote angeschaut und ziehen den Vergleich zum Straßenpreis. Ob es sich also wirklich um ein Schnäppchen handelt, erfahrt ihr hier.			(<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/amazon/angebote/#1784869740">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ford setzt auf Apple Maps: Ist das auch für Deutschland relevant?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Ford und Apple haben am gestrigen Abend einen großen Deal verkündet, denn man arbeitet in der Automobilbranche zusammen. Apple Maps wird die Basis bei der kommenden UEV-Plattform (Universal Electric Vehicle) …]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690628/it-nachrichten/ford-setzt-auf-apple-maps-ist-das-auch-fuer-deutschland-relevant/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690628/it-nachrichten/ford-setzt-auf-apple-maps-ist-das-auch-fuer-deutschland-relevant/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 05:47:33 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="1600" height="1100" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.mobiflip.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/ford-logo-2025-neu-header.jpg?fit=1600%2C1100&amp;ssl=1" class="attachment-full size-full wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.mobiflip.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/ford-logo-2025-neu-header.jpg?w=1600&amp;ssl=1 1600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.mobiflip.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/ford-logo-2025-neu-header.jpg?resize=690%2C474&amp;ssl=1 690w" sizes="(max-width: 1600px) 100vw, 1600px">
Ford und Apple haben am gestrigen Abend einen großen Deal verkündet, denn man arbeitet in der Automobilbranche zusammen. Apple Maps wird die Basis bei der kommenden UEV-Plattform (Universal Electric Vehicle) …]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How do you interpret JSIG AC-10?]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hello all, I am curious if anyone has to deal with the JSIG AC-10 control in their environment. As a reminder, here it is: AC-10 CONCURRENT SESSION CONTROL Control: The information system limits the number of concurrent sessions for each non-privileged and privileged to maximum of three (3) sessi...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690512/linux-tipps/how-do-you-interpret-jsig-ac-10/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690512/linux-tipps/how-do-you-interpret-jsig-ac-10/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 03:11:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🐧 Linux Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello all,</p> <p>I am curious if anyone has to deal with the JSIG AC-10 control in their environment. As a reminder, here it is:</p> <pre><code>AC-10 CONCURRENT SESSION CONTROL Control: The information system limits the number of concurrent sessions for each non-privileged and privileged to maximum of three (3) sessions. Supplemental Guidance: Organizations may define the maximum number of concurrent sessions for information system accounts globally, by account type (e.g., privileged user, non-privileged user, domain, specific application), by account, or a combination. For example, organizations may limit the number of concurrent sessions for system administrators or individuals working in particularly sensitive domains or mission-critical applications. This control addresses concurrent sessions for information system accounts and does not address concurrent sessions by single users via multiple system accounts. This control may require third party software or development of a script. </code></pre> <p>I have a solution set up in my environment that tracks how many logons a person does (stored in sqlite3 db). In my pam.d files, I have it check on logon and denies a person from opening more than 3 (ssh, console, xrdp) sessions. It works pretty good although annoying when I want to open a bunch of sessions on patch weekend.</p> <p>I am starting to question why that might matter. What I would more than likely expect to see is "control how many concurrent sessions per machine there are". This certainly seems to be what RHEL-09-412040 talks about, which is /etc/security/limits.conf "maxlogins". That could help prevent DDOS.</p> <p>How do you interpret this? How do you meet this control in your environments?</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Hxcmetal724"> /u/Hxcmetal724 </a> <br> <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1v4wns0/how_do_you_interpret_jsig_ac10/">[link]</a></span>   <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1v4wns0/how_do_you_interpret_jsig_ac10/">[comments]</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Meta faces higher borrowing costs in latest $12bn data centre financing]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[BlackRock-led deal meets investor anxiety over rising AI exposure]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690492/ai-nachrichten/meta-faces-higher-borrowing-costs-in-latest-12bn-data-centre-financing/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690492/ai-nachrichten/meta-faces-higher-borrowing-costs-in-latest-12bn-data-centre-financing/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 02:27:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[BlackRock-led deal meets investor anxiety over rising AI exposure]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-8267 | Open5GS up to 2.7.7 SMF smf_nsmf_handle_created_data_in_vsmf denial of service (Issue 4448)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in Open5GS up to 2.7.7. It has been classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects the function smf_nsmf_handle_created_data_in_vsmf of the component SMF. This manipulation causes denial of service.

This vulnerability appears as CVE-2026-8267. The attack may be i...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690472/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-8267-open5gs-up-to-277-smf-smfnsmfhandlecreateddatainvsmf-denial-of-service-issue-4448/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690472/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-8267-open5gs-up-to-277-smf-smfnsmfhandlecreateddatainvsmf-denial-of-service-issue-4448/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 02:09:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/open5gs">Open5GS up to 2.7.7</a>. It has been classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">problematic</a>. This vulnerability affects the function <code>smf_nsmf_handle_created_data_in_vsmf</code> of the component <em>SMF</em>. This manipulation causes denial of service.

This vulnerability appears as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-8267">CVE-2026-8267</a>. The attack may be initiated remotely. In addition, an exploit is available.

The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-8266 | Open5GS up to 2.7.7 SMF /src/smf/gsm-build.c gsm_build_pdu_session_establishment_accept denial of service (Issue 4447)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in Open5GS up to 2.7.7 and classified as problematic. This affects the function gsm_build_pdu_session_establishment_accept of the file /src/smf/gsm-build.c of the component SMF. The manipulation results in denial of service.

This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2026-82...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690471/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-8266-open5gs-up-to-277-smf-srcsmfgsm-buildc-gsmbuildpdusessionestablishmentaccept-denial-of-service-issue-4447/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690471/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-8266-open5gs-up-to-277-smf-srcsmfgsm-buildc-gsmbuildpdusessionestablishmentaccept-denial-of-service-issue-4447/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 02:09:55 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/open5gs">Open5GS up to 2.7.7</a> and classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">problematic</a>. This affects the function <code>gsm_build_pdu_session_establishment_accept</code> of the file <em>/src/smf/gsm-build.c</em> of the component <em>SMF</em>. The manipulation results in denial of service.

This vulnerability is reported as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-8266">CVE-2026-8266</a>. The attack can be launched remotely. Moreover, an exploit is present.

The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-8268 | Open5GS up to 2.7.7 SMF OpenAPI_list_create denial of service (Issue 4449)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in Open5GS up to 2.7.7. It has been declared as problematic. This issue affects the function OpenAPI_list_create of the component SMF. Such manipulation leads to denial of service.

This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2026-8268. The attack may be launched remotely. Furth...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690470/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-8268-open5gs-up-to-277-smf-openapilistcreate-denial-of-service-issue-4449/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690470/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-8268-open5gs-up-to-277-smf-openapilistcreate-denial-of-service-issue-4449/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 02:09:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability was found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/open5gs">Open5GS up to 2.7.7</a>. It has been declared as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">problematic</a>. This issue affects the function <code>OpenAPI_list_create</code> of the component <em>SMF</em>. Such manipulation leads to denial of service.

This vulnerability is traded as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-8268">CVE-2026-8268</a>. The attack may be launched remotely. Furthermore, there is an exploit available.

The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Judge Extends Pause for Paramount-Warner Bros. Deal]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The court blocked the companies from closing the acquisition through mid-August, as a judge considers two lawsuits challenging it.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690456/it-nachrichten/judge-extends-pause-for-paramount-warner-bros-deal/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690456/it-nachrichten/judge-extends-pause-for-paramount-warner-bros-deal/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 01:48:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The court blocked the companies from closing the acquisition through mid-August, as a judge considers two lawsuits challenging it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[CVE-2026-8261 | Squirrel up to 3.2 squirrel/sqobject.cpp SQFunctionProto::Load heap-based overflow (Issue 326)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Squirrel up to 3.2. This affects the function SQFunctionProto::Load of the file squirrel/sqobject.cpp. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow.

This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2026-8261. The attack is restricted to local e...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690447/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-8261-squirrel-up-to-32-squirrelsqobjectcpp-sqfunctionprotoload-heap-based-overflow-issue-326/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690447/sicherheitsluecken/cve-2026-8261-squirrel-up-to-32-squirrelsqobjectcpp-sqfunctionprotoload-heap-based-overflow-issue-326/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 01:44:08 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🕵️ Sicherheitslücken</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A vulnerability classified as <a href="https://vuldb.com/kb/risk">critical</a> has been found in <a href="https://vuldb.com/product/squirrel">Squirrel up to 3.2</a>. This affects the function <code>SQFunctionProto::Load</code> of the file <em>squirrel/sqobject.cpp</em>. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow.

This vulnerability is tracked as <a href="https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-8261">CVE-2026-8261</a>. The attack is restricted to local execution. Moreover, an exploit is present.

The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Aktuelle Technik-Blitzangebote von Amazon im Überblick 24. Juli]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Täglich bieten Amazon und andere Händler zahlreiche Produkte für eine begrenzte Zeit preisgesenkt an. Wir haben uns die heutigen Technik-Angebote angeschaut und ziehen den Vergleich zum Straßenpreis. Ob es sich also wirklich um ein Schnäppchen handelt, erfahrt ihr hier.			(Weiter lesen)]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690413/it-security-nachrichten/aktuelle-technik-blitzangebote-von-amazon-im-ueberblick-24-juli/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690413/it-security-nachrichten/aktuelle-technik-blitzangebote-von-amazon-im-ueberblick-24-juli/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:56:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/amazon/angebote/#1784847000"><img hspace="5" border="0" align="left" alt="Amazon, Schnäppchen, Rabattaktion, Deals, sale, Angebote, Sonderangebote, Angebot, shopping, Rabatt, Flash, Deal, Blitzangebote, Blitz, Nachlass, Amazon Logo, Amazon.de" width="1920" height="1080" src="https://i.wfcdn.de/teaser/1920/42128.jpg"></a>
			Täglich bieten Amazon und andere Händler zahlreiche Produkte für eine begrenzte Zeit preisgesenkt an. Wir haben uns die heutigen Technik-Angebote angeschaut und ziehen den Vergleich zum Straßenpreis. Ob es sich also wirklich um ein Schnäppchen handelt, erfahrt ihr hier.			(<a href="https://winfuture.de/special/amazon/angebote/#1784847000">Weiter lesen</a>)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft Responds to LG Monitors Installing McAfee Ads On Windows]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[LG is removing a McAfee pop-up ad from its LG Monitor App Installer after criticism that some LG monitors were silently installing the app through Windows Update and showing ads on every boot. Microsoft says LG agreed to disable the McAfee pop-up, but the broader issue remains: Windows allows cer...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690305/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-responds-to-lg-monitors-installing-mcafee-ads-on-windows/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690305/it-security-nachrichten/microsoft-responds-to-lg-monitors-installing-mcafee-ads-on-windows/</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:09:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[LG is removing a McAfee pop-up ad from its LG Monitor App Installer after criticism that some LG monitors were silently installing the app through Windows Update and showing ads on every boot. Microsoft says LG agreed to disable the McAfee pop-up, but the broader issue remains: Windows allows certain peripheral companion apps to install automatically without notifying users. Ars Technica reports: Following Gamers Nexus' video, a Microsoft representative stated that the LG Monitor App Installer will no longer show pop-up ads for McAfee. In response to a social media post about the app, Pavan Davuluri, EVP of Windows and devices at Microsoft, said this week: "We've connected with the team at LG and as an immediate next step, they have agreed to disable the McAfee pop-up from their app. We appreciate LG working with us toward a shared goal of a better experience for our mutual customers. We will keep improving here with our ecosystem partners."
 
As mentioned, some LG monitors appear to have been installing LG Monitor App Installer onto Windows computers for months. Publication Windows Latest noted that the app recently got an update, "and its changelog mentions McAfee as an additional app," which could be what prompted more people to see the ads... and then complain about them. However, the removal of McAfee doesn't address the problem of a peripheral installing ad-pushing software onto people's computers.
 
Users have been finding LG Monitor App Installer and its ads on their systems without LG ever showing a prompt or asking for permission. LG has some of the most expensive computer monitors available. Paying, in some cases, over $1,000 for a monitor that ends up forcing ads onto Windows is disruptive and a privacy concern. Once the app is installed, "LG technically possesses permission to use 'all system resources,'" as well as to "collect geolocation, device data, online activity, contacts, user credentials, transactions, and more," [editor-in-chief of Gamers Nexus, Steve Burke] said.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Microsoft+Responds+to+LG+Monitors+Installing+McAfee+Ads+On+Windows%3A+https%3A%2F%2Ftech.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F23%2F2137202%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftech.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F23%2F2137202%2Fmicrosoft-responds-to-lg-monitors-installing-mcafee-ads-on-windows%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/07/23/2137202/microsoft-responds-to-lg-monitors-installing-mcafee-ads-on-windows?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[EX1436407: Exchange Online schiebt Mails in Quarantäne]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Seit dem 19. Juli 2026 gibt es wohl das Problem, dass bei Exchange Online E-Mails ungewollt in Quarantäne geschoben werden. Exchange Online-Nutzer liefen dadurch beim Empfangen und Versenden von E-Mails sowie beim Zugriff auf ihre Kalender in Probleme. Microsoft ist … Weiterlesen →
Quelle]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690262/it-nachrichten/ex1436407-exchange-online-schiebt-mails-in-quarantaene/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690262/it-nachrichten/ex1436407-exchange-online-schiebt-mails-in-quarantaene/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 23:34:09 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Seit dem 19. Juli 2026 gibt es wohl das Problem, dass bei Exchange Online E-Mails ungewollt in Quarantäne geschoben werden. Exchange Online-Nutzer liefen dadurch beim Empfangen und Versenden von E-Mails sowie beim Zugriff auf ihre Kalender in Probleme. Microsoft ist … <a href="https://borncity.com/blog/2026/07/23/ex1436407-exchange-online-schiebt-mails-in-quarantaene/">Weiterlesen <span class="meta-nav">→</span></a>
<p><a href="https://borncity.com/blog/2026/07/23/ex1436407-exchange-online-schiebt-mails-in-quarantaene/" rel="nofollow">Quelle</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Check Point hole grants unauthenticated attackers full SmartConsole admin privileges]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Check Point has confirmed that a critical security hole in its SmartConsole management tool, one that allows unauthenticated attackers to assume full admin privileges, is now being exploited in the wild. The vulnerability, CVE-2026-16232, was given a CVSS score of 9.3.



In its security alert, C...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690156/it-security-nachrichten/check-point-hole-grants-unauthenticated-attackers-full-smartconsole-admin-privileges/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690156/it-security-nachrichten/check-point-hole-grants-unauthenticated-attackers-full-smartconsole-admin-privileges/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 22:25:55 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Check Point has confirmed that a critical security hole in its SmartConsole management tool, one that <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-16232" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">allows unauthenticated attackers</a> to assume full admin privileges, is now being exploited in the wild. The vulnerability, <a href="https://github.com/advisories/ghsa-m2xx-23gx-734v" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">CVE-2026-16232</a>, was given a CVSS score of 9.3.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In its security alert, <a href="https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk185169/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Check Point described</a> the bug as one allowing an unauthenticated attacker to “obtain an application login token and use it to login via SmartConsole with full admin privileges and apply changes to the security policy and security configuration.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company has <a href="https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/Jumbo_HFA/R82.10/R82.10/R82.10-List-of-all-Resolved-Issues.htm" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">released a patch</a> for the bug and also recommends that users “limit Trusted Clients, GUI clients, to trusted IP addresses/subnets.” That approach has always been a best practice, but practical networking realities today make it challenging to maintain. <a href="https://www.csoonline.com/article/4195311/check-point-cto-jonathan-zanger-sees-ai-elevating-the-value-of-cyber.html" target="_blank">Check Point</a> said that the exploit has impacted ten of its customers, all of whom it had notified directly.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Far worse than most</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://my.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=PRF004767" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Frank Dickson</a>, group VP for security at IDC, said this security hole is far worse than most.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This hits harder than your average CVE because of where it lives,” he said. “The CVE targets the SmartConsole login on Check Point’s Security Management Server, the console that pushes policy to every gateway underneath it. Popping a gateway gets you one lock picked. Popping the management server is more like finding the One Ring: one stolen token to rule every gateway it manages, no need to fight each one individually. The attacker can rewrite policy, open new VPN paths and kill the logging.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In an interview with CSO Online, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/lotem-finkelstein-05797a85/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lotem Finkelstein</a>, vice president of research at Check Point, said that the company learned of the vulnerability on Sunday, emailed customers the same day, and released the patch within 72 hours.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But when his team re-reviewed earlier logs, knowing what to look for, they spotted this hole being attacked as early as April, Finkelstein said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The fact that, over the course of three months, the team only found ten organizations under attack, indicated that it has been very difficult for the attacker to find vulnerable systems, he noted; customers were, in the main, using secure settings to protect themselves.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nonetheless, Finkelstein said, Check Point considers this hole to be “a severe vulnerability.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Challenges of IP address restrictions</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While it can be technically challenging to keep the IP address allowlists that Check Point recommends current, given DHCP’s ability to easily change those addresses, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/assafmo/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Assaf Morag</a>, a cybersecurity researcher at Flare, noted that specifically limiting access to a management console is far more critical than limiting overall external access.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Implementing Trusted Clients as a per-IP allowlist is impractical,” he said, but that is not the case with restricting management access. “The more scalable solution is to restrict access based on trusted administrative network segments such as VPN pools, management VLANs, or jump hosts rather than maintaining lists of individual DHCP-assigned client addresses,” he explained. “That gives you the security benefit without creating a full-time administrative task. Maintaining allowlists for individual hosts is much more practical when those hosts have stable, predictable IP addresses, rather than dynamically assigned DHCP addresses.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/pieter-arntz-04164b2/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Pieter Arntz</a>, malware intelligence researcher at Malwarebytes, also noted that the constantly changing nature of global IP addresses can prove annoying to IT teams. Stressing that he is not familiar with Check Point’s specific settings, he noted, “Certain settings are a nuisance when applied strictly, and at some point the IT staff gets tired of constantly tweaking and they abandon the most secure path.”</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Ideal platform for long-term attacks</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/eclectiqus/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Mike Wilkes</a>, enterprise CISO at Aikido Security,  agreed that the severity and exposure of this hole is alarming.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“This is exactly the kind of vulnerability that keeps CISOs awake at night because it strikes at the one system that is supposed to stand between the attacker and everything else. An authentication bypass that grants administrative control of a perimeter firewall isn’t just another CVE to patch. It’s an invitation for an adversary to rewrite the rules of the network itself,” he said. “The uncomfortable reality is that nobody runs a CrowdStrike agent on their firewall. Once an attacker owns an edge device, they gain a uniquely privileged position that often falls outside the visibility of traditional endpoint security, making it an ideal platform for persistence, credential theft, traffic manipulation, and long-term espionage.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">IDC’s Dickson strongly encouraged CISOs to deploy the patch, not to just change settings to mitigate the issue. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Apply the actual hotfix,” he said. “Don’t just restrict Trusted Client IPs and call it done. That’s a stopgap, not a fix. Any internet-facing management console, Check Point or otherwise, is a five-alarm architecture problem independent of this CVE.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And, he added, “since attackers here can disable logging, audit admin activity going back before the bug surfaced. Quiet logs aren’t proof nothing happened. This is the recurring theme with ‘single pane of glass’ security tools: the console built to make everything easier to run is also the one thing you really don’t want someone else driving.”</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[iPhone Ultra Production Enters Final Adjustment Phase, New Report Says]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple’s first foldable iPhone is moving closer to launch, although the exact release timing remains unclear as Foxconn completes final adjustments to the manufacturing process. Apple is still expected to unveil the iPhone Ultra alongside the iPhone 18 Pro lineup at its September event, with sales...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690102/ios-mac-os/iphone-ultra-production-enters-final-adjustment-phase-new-report-says/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690102/ios-mac-os/iphone-ultra-production-enters-final-adjustment-phase-new-report-says/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 21:37:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple’s first foldable iPhone is moving closer to launch, although the exact release timing remains unclear as Foxconn completes final adjustments to the manufacturing process. Apple is still expected to unveil the iPhone Ultra alongside the iPhone 18 Pro lineup at its September event, with sales likely starting shortly after the announcement.



DigiTimes reports that Foxconn is carrying out final mass-production adjustments for the foldable device. The wording does not confirm a serious production problem, as manufacturers often make similar changes before increasing output for a major product launch.



Apple has reportedly placed strict quality standards on the iPhone Ultra because it will be the company’s first foldable smartphone. The company also waited for Samsung Display to develop an inner screen with a less visible crease before moving ahead with production.



Limited availability remains possible



Earlier reports suggested that Apple could delay the iPhone Ultra until early next year, while later claims pointed to a shorter delay of one or two months. More recent expectations suggest that Apple will announce the device in September, although stock may remain limited during the first few weeks.



For now, Foxconn’s final adjustments suggest that production work continues ahead of the expected launch. Apple has not confirmed the device, its release date, or its availability plans.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[KI-Einführung gelingt schneller, wenn Security Governance als Enablement denkt]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[LONDON (IT BOLTWISE) – Die Beschleunigung bei KI-Systemen zwingt Security-Teams zu einer neuen Rolle: Nicht bremsen, sondern einen schnellen, sicheren Pfad zur Nutzung schaffen. Laut McKinsey nutzen mittlerweile 76 % der Mitarbeitenden KI zumindest in Teilen ihrer Arbeit. Das Problem ist weniger ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690086/it-security-nachrichten/ki-einfuehrung-gelingt-schneller-wenn-security-governance-als-enablement-denkt/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690086/it-security-nachrichten/ki-einfuehrung-gelingt-schneller-wenn-security-governance-als-enablement-denkt/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 21:34:51 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="1024" height="1024" src="https://www.it-boltwise.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ai-ki-governance-enablement-security-dashboard.jpg" class="attachment- size- wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://www.it-boltwise.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ai-ki-governance-enablement-security-dashboard.jpg 1024w, https://www.it-boltwise.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ai-ki-governance-enablement-security-dashboard-300x300.jpg 300w, https://www.it-boltwise.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ai-ki-governance-enablement-security-dashboard-150x150.jpg 150w, https://www.it-boltwise.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ai-ki-governance-enablement-security-dashboard-768x768.jpg 768w, https://www.it-boltwise.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ai-ki-governance-enablement-security-dashboard-840x840.jpg 840w, https://www.it-boltwise.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ai-ki-governance-enablement-security-dashboard-120x120.jpg 120w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px">LONDON (IT BOLTWISE) – Die Beschleunigung bei KI-Systemen zwingt Security-Teams zu einer neuen Rolle: Nicht bremsen, sondern einen schnellen, sicheren Pfad zur Nutzung schaffen. Laut McKinsey nutzen mittlerweile 76 % der Mitarbeitenden KI zumindest in Teilen ihrer Arbeit. Das Problem ist weniger Technik als Prozessgeschwindigkeit, weil der offizielle Freigabeweg oft hinter den Release-Zyklen der KI […]</p>
<div><a href="https://www.it-boltwise.de/ki-einfuehrung-gelingt-schneller-wenn-security-governance-als-enablement-denkt.html">... den vollständigen Artikel <strong>»KI-Einführung gelingt schneller, wenn Security Governance als Enablement denkt«</strong> lesen</a></div>
<p>Dieser Beitrag <a href="https://www.it-boltwise.de/ki-einfuehrung-gelingt-schneller-wenn-security-governance-als-enablement-denkt.html">KI-Einführung gelingt schneller, wenn Security Governance als Enablement denkt</a> erschien als erstes auf <a href="https://www.it-boltwise.de/">IT BOLTWISE x Artificial Intelligence</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[NetworkManager update advances IPv6-only support, Wi‑Fi management, and security for Linux-based operating systems]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Networking is core to any operating system, and when it comes to Linux, it’s actually a combination of several key components. The Linux kernel handles the data plane, moving packets, and holding live device state. NetworkManager is the network configuration service, operating as the control plan...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690083/it-security-nachrichten/networkmanager-update-advances-ipv6-only-support-wifi-management-and-security-for-linux-based-operating-systems/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690083/it-security-nachrichten/networkmanager-update-advances-ipv6-only-support-wifi-management-and-security-for-linux-based-operating-systems/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 21:34:46 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Networking is core to any operating system, and when it comes to Linux, it’s actually a combination of several key components. The Linux kernel handles the data plane, moving packets, and holding live device state. NetworkManager is the network configuration service, operating as the control plane, deciding what a device’s configuration should be.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/-/releases/1.58.0">NetworkManager 1.58</a> was released this week, following more than five months of development and 407 commits since version 1.56. The release covers three areas: expanded support for IPv6-only networks, a set of Wi-Fi management updates, and a round of security hardening.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">IPv4 address exhaustion remains the pressure behind the first of those areas, pushing more networks toward IPv6-only operation every year.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“More networks, mobile carriers, cloud providers, and anyone squeezed by IPv4 exhaustion are running IPv6-only by default,” <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/vanhoof/">Chris Van Hoof</a>, director of Linux engineering, platform enablement at Red Hat, told <em>Network World</em>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Advancing IPv6-only support</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dual stack networking, running IPv4 and IPv6 in parallel, has been the default IPv6 transition strategy for years. Dual stack networking, however, has a structural problem in that it still requires an IPv4 address on every device, so it does nothing to relieve address exhaustion pressure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">An alternative model called IPv6-mostly addresses that gap. It is defined in RFC 8925, “IPv6-Only-Preferred Option for DHCPv4,” and lets capable clients drop IPv4 entirely while legacy hosts that still need it keep receiving it on the same network segment.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“NetworkManager can also now auto-signal RFC 8925’s IPv6-only-preferred option, telling the network a host is fine skipping an IPv4 lease entirely,” Van Hoof said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For the traffic that still needs IPv4, NetworkManager 1.58 adds support for CLAT, short for customer-side translator. CLAT is the client-side half of 464XLAT, a mechanism defined in RFC 6877, “464XLAT: Combination of Stateful and Stateless Translation.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">464XLAT pairs CLAT on the endpoint, which performs stateless header translation, with a stateful NAT64 translator on the provider side, letting IPv4-only apps keep functioning on a network that has no IPv4 of its own.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“CLAT is the translation layer that lets legacy IPv4-only apps and services keep working on those networks without bolt-on middleware,” Van Hoof said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Wi-Fi management updates</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">NetworkManager 1.58 also brings a set of changes to how the daemon handles Wi-Fi connections and configuration.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Band selection: </strong>The band property of Wi-Fi connections now accepts a 6GHz value, and a Wi-Fi scan run through nmcli, NetworkManager’s command line tool, now shows each access point’s band as well.</li>



<li><strong>Credential handling:</strong> WPS credentials with a 64 character hex PSK are now accepted, matching what some access points return.</li>



<li><strong>Text interface improvements:</strong> nmtui, NetworkManager’s menu driven text interface, picked up several usability additions. A new device select button lets you choose a physical interface from a list instead of typing its name. The activation screen gained a rescan Wi-Fi button, and secret prompts now include a show password checkbox. There is also a share QR code option, mirroring the existing nmcli device wifi show-password command.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Security hardening</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The release fixes vulnerabilities and tightens several defaults tied to DHCP handling and connection permissions.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>CVE-2026-10805: </strong>Hostnames and MUD URLs are now validated before being written to the dhclient configuration file, rejecting characters that could alter the config syntax.</li>



<li><strong>DHCPv4 client fix: </strong>An out-of-bounds read in the internal DHCPv4 client, triggerable by an on-link attacker with a malformed UDP packet, has been fixed.</li>



<li><strong>Router option validation: </strong>The internal DHCPv4 client now ignores DHCP option 3, the Router option, when a lease also contains option 121, the Classless Static Route option, following the recommendation in RFC 3442.</li>



<li><strong>Permission checks and deprecations:</strong> For private connections that restrict access to specific users, NetworkManager now verifies that the user can access the referenced 802.1X certificates and keys.</li>
</ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Tunneling and automation updates</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Two smaller but practical additions round out this release: a new tunnel type for virtualized networks, and a fix that closes a gap in how NetworkManager’s state survives a reboot.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">NetworkManager 1.58 also adds support for creating and managing GENEVE tunnel interfaces. GENEVE, short for Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation, is a tunneling protocol that wraps Ethernet frames inside UDP packets, letting virtualized or overlay networks run on top of physical Layer 3 infrastructure. It shows up mainly in virtualization and cloud environments, where a hypervisor or container networking layer needs to build a virtual network segment across physical hosts. Previously, NetworkManager could not create or manage these interfaces directly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The release also adds persisted managed state. NetworkManager tracks whether it is responsible for a given network device, a setting called its managed state. Until now, that setting reset on every reboot, so provisioning tools had to reapply it each time a system restarted. NetworkManager 1.58 lets the managed state survive a reboot when it is set through nmcli or the D-Bus API.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It’s a small change but closes a real automation gap: Provisioning tools and cloud-init style workflows can set a device’s state once via D-Bus or nmcli and trust it survives a reboot, instead of reapplying config every time,” Van Hoof said.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[New pip flag fixes longstanding Python frustration]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A new version of Python’s native package management tool, pip, will remove a limitation that has frustrated Python developers for years. If you wanted to install the dependencies for a given package, but not install the package itself, you were stuck. Either you had to extract the dependency list...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690075/ai-nachrichten/new-pip-flag-fixes-longstanding-python-frustration/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690075/ai-nachrichten/new-pip-flag-fixes-longstanding-python-frustration/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 21:27:38 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A new version of Python’s native package management tool, pip, will remove a limitation that has frustrated Python developers for years. If you wanted to install the dependencies for a given package, but not install the package itself, you were stuck. Either you had to extract the dependency list from the package and install it by hand, or you had to build the whole package anyway.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Why was this a problem? Sometimes, you want only the dependencies for a package—for instance, as a way to create a separate environment for testing or another project. If you’re <a href="https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/8049#issuecomment-633845028">making source distributions via CI</a>, some requirements might be needed to make the source distribution but aren’t actually included in it (e.g., Cython). You would need to install these requirements somewhere—apart from the project itself—to perform the build step.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A dependencies-only install mode for packages is a long-requested feature. Developer James O’Claire <a href="https://jamesoclaire.com/2026/07/23/pip-26-2-only-deps-solves-16-years-of-app-deployment-hacks/">found many examples</a> of such requests, along with various workarounds. Most of those involved third-party solutions of some sort.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now, a new feature set to land in <a href="https://github.com/pypa/pip/pull/13895">pip version 26.2</a> will fix this problem from the inside. The command <code>pip install --only-deps</code> will install only the dependencies for a given package. Note that it will not install build dependencies for the package, but only runtime dependencies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Note that you can accomplish this with existing third-party tools. For instance, <code>uv sync --no-install-project</code> has the same behavior. But having this functionality right inside pip means you don’t have to turn to external tooling—or ugly hacks—to solve the problem. This may be an example of how third-party projects like uv (<a href="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336295/how-to-use-uv-a-superfast-python-package-installer.html" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.infoworld.com/article/2336295/how-to-use-uv-a-superfast-python-package-installer.html">a superfast Python package installer</a>) are inspiring native Python features where they make sense.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">pip 26.2 is scheduled to be released by the end of July 2026.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Multi-turn attacks broke AI models 88% of the time — single-turn testing missed it, Cisco AI security lead warns at VB Transform 2026]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[When Cisco ran 6,986 multi-turn attacks against 15 flagship models, attackers who adapted across the conversation broke through as often as 88.3% of the time. Amy Chang, Cisco's head of AI threat intelligence and security research, brought that finding to the agentic security panel at VB Transfor...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690018/it-nachrichten/multi-turn-attacks-broke-ai-models-88-of-the-time-single-turn-testing-missed-it-cisco-ai-security-lead-warns-at-vb-transform-2026/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690018/it-nachrichten/multi-turn-attacks-broke-ai-models-88-of-the-time-single-turn-testing-missed-it-cisco-ai-security-lead-warns-at-vb-transform-2026/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:48:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Cisco ran 6,986 multi-turn attacks against <a href="https://blogs.cisco.com/ai/proprietary-problems">15 flagship models</a>, attackers who adapted across the conversation broke through as often as 88.3% of the time. Amy Chang, Cisco's head of AI threat intelligence and security research, brought that finding to the agentic security panel at <a href="https://venturebeat.com/vbtransform2026">VB Transform 2026</a>; the number should worry anyone still running single-turn red-teaming programs.</p><p><a href="https://venturebeat.com/resources/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials">VentureBeat's June 2026 Pulse survey of 107 enterprise respondents</a> explains why the room was full. More than half, 54%, have already had a confirmed agent security incident (18%) or a near-miss caught before harm (36%). Just 32% give every agent its own scoped, managed identity, and fewer still, 30%, isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes. Provider-native and hyperscaler controls remain the primary agent security layer at <a href="https://venturebeat.com/security/shared-api-keys-expose-ai-agent-fleets-venturebeat-research">82% of companies surveyed</a>. The world's largest security vendors have done the same math. </p><p>Palo Alto Networks closed its <a href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/company/press/2026/palo-alto-networks-completes-acquisition-of-cyberark-to-secure-the-ai-era">$25 billion acquisition of CyberArk</a> in February, CrowdStrike <a href="https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/press-releases/crowdstrike-to-acquire-sgnl-to-transform-identity-security-for-ai-era/">agreed in January to pay $740 million for SGNL</a>, and Cisco announced its <a href="https://blogs.cisco.com/news/cisco-announces-intent-to-acquire-astrix-security">intent to acquire Astrix Security</a> for a reported $400 million, all of it aimed at the identity and isolation layer most enterprises have not finished building.</p><div></div><p>Chang came to the panel with almost two decades of experience spanning cybersecurity operations, government, and the military. She ran global cybersecurity operations as an executive director at JPMorgan Chase, where she led the bank's cyber threat intelligence teams, and served as a senior staffer on the House Foreign Affairs Committee and as a U.S. Navy Reserve officer. She also teaches cybersecurity and emerging threats as adjunct faculty at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies.</p><p>Chang's 88.3% number comes from a study she co-authored with Nicholas Conley, built on 30,090 single-turn prompts and 6,986 multi-turn attacks against those 15 closed and proprietary flagship models. Multi-turn success rates ranged from 7.89% to 88.3%, every model tested showed non-trivial multi-turn exposure, and the two testing styles did not even rank the models in the same order. Cisco publishes adversarial evaluation signals for what is now 105 models on its <a href="https://leaderboard.aidefense.cisco.com/">LLM Security Leaderboard</a>, she told the audience.</p><p>"If you don't understand how models are susceptible to different types of attacks, then you are unable to account for how that model that is powering your agent, that is powering your application, to understand where those failure points are," Chang said. Single-turn testing is the one-shot malicious prompt, she explained, while extending an attack into a longer conversation "is more realistic of how we are actually engaging with our models, with our agents, with our applications." That longer arc surfaces harmful outputs and misaligned behaviors that a snapshot never catches.</p><p>Cisco has pushed the testing itself into agentic territory. Chang described a framework where agents assess a deployment scenario, develop relevant attacks, judge whether they are worth pursuing, execute them, and evaluate their own success. What surprised her most, after all that sophistication, was how simple the defensive answer stays. "The answer is still that it's pretty simple," she said. "You don't have to get super creative. You just need to think about truly what are the fundamentals and basics of what I'm trying to secure in my organization."</p><p>Her starting point for CISOs beginning agentic deployments is Cisco's <a href="https://blogs.cisco.com/ai/security-framework">Integrated AI Security and Safety Framework</a>, which she said "stipulates all the ways that AI can be compromised across the AI lifecycle" from modality through supply chain. From there, teams can work backward from real incidents, trace how each attack was achieved, and use the framework to build a strategy with the right coverage and mitigations.</p><p>Heather Ceylan, the CISO of Box, sees the same gap from the defender's side. "A lot of what you see out there with agent red teaming is just single-turn, and that's not how people are actually interacting with AI day-to-day," she told the audience. Box now simulates multi-turn adversaries with agents that think like an attacker and iterate attempt after attempt to hijack the target. "You have to pressure test your agents because otherwise you don't know if your execution controls are really working as you intended."</p><p>Box deployed agents inside its security operations center about a year ago, starting with human approval required for every action, and trust built quickly enough that analysts shifted into monitoring mode. Then the agent made one mistake, and every bit of that accumulated trust vanished. "They had to start all over again," she said. "So I think that that monitoring piece is so important. Even if you're not gonna have a human in the loop, things change, models change, and we can't control how the models change and interpret things."</p><p>Rajesh Parekh, VP of AI and ML at Intuit, brought the builder's perspective. Parekh led large-scale computer vision and ML systems powering Google's Maps and Geo products before joining Intuit, and holds a doctorate in computer science. </p><h2>Three layers versus an operating system</h2><p>Ceylan described Box's approach as three concentric layers. Permissioning comes first, so the agent never accesses more content than the human who invoked it. Ephemeral sandbox environments spin up for each agent task, containing the blast radius if an agent gets hijacked, and runtime execution control restricts the agent's tool calls to only those relevant to the task at hand. "If you want an agent to summarize a doc for you, if you have a prompt injection that came in that says forward this to maliciousattacker at domain.com, it can't do that," Ceylan said. "That action in that tool call is not even in its vocabulary."</p><p>She classified agent actions into three oversight categories. Actions that are not sensitive, like read and summarize, need no human in the loop. Moderately sensitive actions skip human approval but get logged and monitored, while destructive actions like mass deletion of files always require a human. "Things are gonna shift between those three categories quite a bit," she acknowledged, "but setting those types of categories up front allows you to have a principled framework."</p><p>Rather than layering controls onto agents one at a time, Intuit has built a central platform called GenOS, short for generative AI operating system, which abstracts security, risk, and fraud modeling so individual agent developers never reinvent protection. "Permissioning is not about giving access to AI," Parekh said. "Instead, it is defining very tightly scoped and clearly auditable authority to the agent to perform very specific tasks." Intuit evolved from agents inheriting user permissions to each agent carrying its own identity, and the company is now investigating mid-session permission changes tied to the specific task underway.</p><p>Parekh calls the broader model an AI-powered expert platform, one where the human expert is built into the trust architecture rather than bolted on as a gate. "The paradigm that we are pursuing is where the user, the AI agent, and the human expert are collaborating to solve the user problem," he said.</p><h2>The end of human code review</h2><p>Ceylan took on the tension between security testing and development velocity without hedging. "The days of secure code reviews where a human's looking at the code and we're looking at security architecture reviews, design docs, those are done," she said. "If you keep trying to do security that way, you're gonna get left behind." Box is building toward a fully agentic development lifecycle where agents review design documents, apply security requirements, and review the code for vulnerabilities. "I'm very optimistic that we will get to a point where we will write code without security vulnerabilities because agents and the models are going to get so good at writing code without vulnerabilities," she said. "We're still a long way away from that."</p><p>Her advice for development teams skips the advanced AI concepts entirely and returns to basics that predate agents. "It comes down to very basic least privilege access," she said. "If you start giving your agents overly broad permissions at the beginning, it's really hard to comb that back and build an infrastructure that allows for those ephemeral credentials and only those narrowly scoped tasks."</p><p>Parekh explained why the red teaming surface has expanded so quickly. "These agents have skills, and skills could become vulnerabilities," he said. "Agents have access to certain data, they have access to tools, and there could be threats that are lurking within those tools as well. So suddenly the blast radius of the malicious code or the intent increases dramatically." When Intuit identifies common vulnerability patterns from its manual red teaming exercises, it automates those tests back into the GenOS harness so future agents inherit protection and red teamers stay focused on new threat vectors. Runtime scanning of prompts and responses adds a final layer that can stop a suspect response and escalate to a human expert, he said.</p><p>"You need to continuously test to ensure that those remain robust to the protections that you have built, as well as to account for any sort of drift or any other types of dependencies that you introduce into your scenario that can create novel vulnerabilities," she said.</p><h2>Intent versus probability</h2><p>An audience question about intent detection set off the sharpest exchange of the session. Ceylan noted that when Box's own agent operates, the system always knows the user's intent because it controls the prompt, which means guardrails and tool-call restrictions can be engineered around it. The harder challenge, which she admitted Box is still trying to solve, arrives when external agents connect and the context behind the request is opaque.</p><p>That exchange exposed a split running through the wider industry. Mastercard, in the fireside chat immediately preceding the panel, came down on the side of quantifying intent, building an open-source framework to propagate it as a standard because complex B2B procurement cannot work without that trust. Endpoint security CTOs, in briefings with VentureBeat, have gone the other way, saying they will bet on probability rather than intent inference for production workloads. Chang explained why models, as they are trained today, cannot reliably derive intent from a prompt, which is why deterministic controls and behavioral proxies remain necessary. Ceylan agreed that both are required. "If you're not doing anything deterministic, you're really relying heavily on that intent, and I haven't seen programs that are there yet," she said.</p><p>Ceylan's story about trust collapsing after a single agent mistake landed as the panel's most memorable moment because enterprise agentic security is not a problem that gets solved and stays solved. Models change, permissions drift, and adversaries adapt across multi-turn conversations that snapshot tests never capture.</p><p>For the 82% of enterprises relying on provider-native controls as their primary security layer, and the 59% shopping for agent security tooling over the next 12 months, the panel's takeaway was blunt. Test the way attackers attack, across full conversations and continuously, or find out in production what your single-turn red teaming missed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Black Forest Labs launches FLUX 3 capable of generating images and 20-second video with audio — but in limited release to start]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Black Forest Labs (BFL) is expanding its FLUX family beyond image generation with today's launch of FLUX 3, a multimodal frontier model trained to understand and generate images, or combined audio/video clips up to 20 seconds from a single prompt — and to extend the same underlying architecture t...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690017/it-nachrichten/black-forest-labs-launches-flux-3-capable-of-generating-images-and-20-second-video-with-audio-but-in-limited-release-to-start/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690017/it-nachrichten/black-forest-labs-launches-flux-3-capable-of-generating-images-and-20-second-video-with-audio-but-in-limited-release-to-start/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:48:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Black Forest Labs (BFL) is expanding its FLUX family beyond image generation with <a href="https://bfl.ai/blog/flux-3">today's launch of FLUX 3</a>, a multimodal frontier model trained to understand and generate images, or combined audio/video clips up to 20 seconds from a single prompt — and to extend the same underlying architecture to robotic vision and actions.</p><p>The Freiburg, Germany-based AI lab says FLUX 3 is jointly trained across those modalities rather than assembling separate image, video and audio models behind a common interface. </p><p>That distinction is central to the company's pitch: BFL wants enterprises to think about creative generation, simulation, computer use and robotics as connected applications of a single capability it calls visual intelligence — models, in the company's words, "that can perceive, predict, and act across physical and digital environments." This release marks BFL's first public video generation model. </p><div></div><p>FLUX 3 will be offered through four product lines: FLUX 3 Video, FLUX 3 Image, FLUX 3 Action and the upcoming, open source FLUX 3 Dev. FLUX 3 Video, with optional native audio generation, and FLUX 3 Action are entering a <a href="https://tally.so/r/44d9NX">gated "Early Access" program now</a>, to which anyone can apply, but which BFL must approve. </p><p>There is presently no public access through BFL's application programming interface (API) or those of partners yet, but the company says FLUX 3 Image will roll out in the coming weeks, followed by general availability. The limited initial availability rollout echoes the release strategies of new models from other frontier labs in the U.S. lately, including <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/anthropic-says-its-most-powerful-ai-cyber-model-is-too-dangerous-to-release">Anthropic</a> and <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/openai-unveils-gpt-5-6-sol-terra-and-luna-models-but-only-accessible-to-limited-preview-partners-for-now-per-us-gov">OpenAI</a>, though those were ostensibly for security concerns and due to government request. </p><p>What the company has not announced is pricing, production service-level commitments, evaluation methodology, sample sizes, rater counts or any image-model benchmarks at all. Enterprise buyers therefore cannot yet calculate total cost of ownership or independently reproduce the video comparisons.</p><p>Another big notable omission: FLUX 3 is <i>not</i> launching with downloadable weights at this time, nor an open source license. BFL says faster and open-weight versions will arrive later this year, and its technical blog names FLUX 3 Dev as "open-weight access to a multimodal backbone, for content creation (video, audio and image) and action prediction" — a considerably broader commitment than any previous FLUX Dev release, all of which covered images only.</p><p>But it arrives last in the sequence. Developers accustomed to receiving a locally deployable FLUX variant alongside — or soon after — a major model announcement will have to wait. That delay does not negate the company's commitment, but it is disappointing given the role open weights have played in FLUX's adoption thus far. </p><h2><b>Flux 3 is rated higher than the competition, but missing pricing and benchmarking details may prevent rapid enterprise adoption</b></h2><p>BFL has published several benchmark comparisons, but they're qualified as preliminary — with full benchmark results and methodology to be published later during broader general availability. </p><p>In early head-to-head preference testing on 10-second, 720p text-to-video clips with audio, the company says FLUX 3 was preferred over Luma Ray 3.2 in 93% of comparisons, Runway Gen-4.5 in 77%, Grok Imagine Video in 69%, Kling v3 Pro in 60%, Happy Horse v1 in 59%, Happy Horse 1.1 in 57%, and both Seedance 2.0 and Google's Gemini Omni Flash in 52%.</p><p>One caveat travels with every one of those figures, and it comes from BFL itself. The chart carrying the results is labeled a "preliminary evaluation of an early FLUX 3 candidate" — meaning the numbers describe a pre-release checkpoint rather than the model now entering early access. That cuts both ways: the shipping model may perform better, but nothing published today measures what customers will actually call.</p><p>Luma Ray 3.2 and Runway Gen-4.5, where FLUX 3 posted 93% and 77%, are the softest comparisons on the list — established products, but not the models currently setting the pace in independent video rankings. Those are real wins, and they are the ones least likely to change an enterprise shortlist.</p><p>Seedance 2.0, at 52%, is a statistical coin flip against a model most Western enterprises cannot currently procure. ByteDance indefinitely postponed Seedance 2.0's international rollout after Netflix, Warner Bros., Disney, Paramount and Sony sent legal threats over alleged systematic copyright infringement, and that suspension remains in place. Tying a frozen product is neither a strong claim nor a damaging one.</p><p><a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/googles-gemini-omni-flash-hits-the-api-turning-enterprise-video-production-into-a-conversation">Gemini Omni Flash</a>, also at 52%, matters much more. Omni is the closest large-platform analogue to what FLUX 3 is attempting — multimodal input, video and audio-aware creation, conversational editing — and by BFL's own measurement, the two are indistinguishable on 10-second text-to-video quality. </p><p>Google's advantage in that matchup is that Omni is generally available via Google's Gemini API for $0.10 per second of generated 720p video, or a 10-second clip for around.</p><p>One regional wrinkle matters for a German company's home market. Editing <i>uploaded</i> video is unavailable to Omni Flash users in the European Economic Area, Switzerland and the United Kingdom, though editing video the model itself generated is permitted. A European enterprise that wants to run its existing footage through a generative editing pass cannot currently do so on Omni Flash.</p><p>Here's a rough guide for enterprises considering which video models to rely upon: </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><b>Model</b></p></td><td><p><b>Max single-generation duration</b></p></td><td><p><b>Max resolution</b></p></td><td><p><b>Key constraints</b></p></td><td><p><b>Price per 10-second clip (720p)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Price per 10-second clip (1080p)</b></p></td><td><p><b>Price per 10-second clip (4K)</b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>FLUX 3 Video </p></td><td><p><b>20 seconds </b></p></td><td><p>Not stated; evaluations run at 720p </p></td><td><p>Early access; no published SLA or pricing </p></td><td><p>Not announced </p></td><td><p>Not announced </p></td><td><p>Not announced </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>HappyHorse 1.1 </p></td><td><p>15 seconds </p></td><td><p>1080p </p></td><td><p>No 4K; closed weights </p></td><td><p>Not published (v1.0 reseller rate is ~$1.82) </p></td><td><p>Not published (v1.0 reseller rate is ~$3.12) </p></td><td><p>n/a </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Veo 3.1 </p></td><td><p>Per-second billing </p></td><td><p><b>4K</b> </p></td><td><p><b>Supports clip extension; preview </b></p></td><td><p>$4.00 </p></td><td><p>$4.00 </p></td><td><p>$6.00 </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Veo 3.1 Fast </p></td><td><p>Per-second billing </p></td><td><p><b>4K </b></p></td><td><p>Preview </p></td><td><p>$1.00 </p></td><td><p>$1.20 </p></td><td><p><b>$3.00 </b></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Veo 3.1 Lite </p></td><td><p>Per-second billing </p></td><td><p>1080p </p></td><td><p>No 4K, no clip extension; preview </p></td><td><p><b>$0.50 </b></p></td><td><p><b>$0.80 </b></p></td><td><p>n/a </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gemini Omni Flash </p></td><td><p>10 seconds (3s minimum) </p></td><td><p>720p at 24 FPS </p></td><td><p>Preview abd no EU access</p></td><td><p>$1.00 </p></td><td><p>n/a </p></td><td><p>n/a </p></td></tr></tbody></table><h2><b>One architecture for media generation and physical action</b></h2><p>FLUX 3 builds on <a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/black-forest-labs-new-self-flow-technique-makes-training-multimodal-ai">Self-Flow</a>, BFL's method for aligning multimodal understanding and generation within one architecture, publicized back in March 2026. </p><p>The company says it significantly scaled up compute and data to train across video, images and audio simultaneously, and that testing showed video generation and action prediction do not require separate foundations — the same architecture could be extended to action prediction without sacrificing what it learned from video.</p><p>"We place vision at the center of our approach because it is the most signal-rich medium of the physical world. Images convey structure, images and video teach spatial relationships, video teaches dynamics, and actions reveal causal relationships. But vision alone is not the complete picture," said Robin Rombach, co-founder and CEO of BFL, in a pre-release statement provided to VentureBeat. "True intelligence means perceiving the world: predicting how it will change, taking action, and learning from the results. Joint training within one unified architecture is what will get us there, because each training modality strengthens the others. Audio conveys timing, prosody, and physical events that elude vision. Language conveys goals, abstractions, and instructions that pixels cannot easily express."</p><p>He put the case more bluntly elsewhere in the announcement: "You can't cheat reality. A model that only learns images can only generate images. But the world is not made of still frames. It moves, sounds, changes, and responds."</p><p>BFL says FLUX 3 targets creative tooling, media, design, e-commerce and physical AI, supporting video generation with synchronized audio, precise image editing, product and material consistency across motion, multilingual generation and robotic action prediction. It is already being tested by Canva, Burda, Magnific (formerly Freepik), Krea and Picsart.</p><p>For creative software companies, the appeal is consolidation. A single foundation could potentially support storyboarding, image editing, product rendering, video variation and localization without repeatedly translating assets and instructions between disconnected models.</p><p>For robotics teams, the potential value is data efficiency. Models that already encode motion, object behavior and physical change may need less task-specific robot training than systems starting from raw demonstrations.</p><h2><b>What FLUX 3 Video can actually do</b></h2><p>The video tier is the most concretely specified part of the launch, and it settles a question that had been circulating as rumor: FLUX 3 generates clips of up to 20 seconds with audio in a single generation. </p><p>Every video output comes with native audio. For comparison, HappyHorse 1.0 tops out at 15 seconds of 1080p with synchronized audio — though BFL has not stated what resolution its 20-second clips run at, and its published evaluations were conducted at 720p. Still, a 20-second long clip from a single prompt is among the longest yet achieved, matching <a href="https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/video-generation">OpenAI's discontinued Sora model.</a></p><p>The capability list BFL published covers:</p><ul><li><p>Text-to-video generation.</p></li><li><p>Image-to-video generation, either animating from a starting frame or using images as visual references.</p></li><li><p>Video-to-video generation from a reference clip, carrying elements such as a specific character into a new scene or context.</p></li><li><p>Generative video-audio continuation from existing video and audio input.</p></li><li><p>Keyframe-to-video generation for controlled transitions between defined moments.</p></li><li><p> Multilingual dialogue.</p></li><li><p>A broad range of visual styles and aspect ratios, from candid camcorder footage to animation and cinematics.</p></li><li><p>Typography generation and animated design.</p></li><li><p>Agentic chaining of individual clips into longer, multi-shot sequences.</p></li></ul><p>That last item is the one enterprise video teams should look at hardest. BFL claims the capabilities combine to produce sequences lasting several minutes, with visual references keeping characters consistent across scenes. If that holds up under production conditions, it addresses the constraint that has kept generative video out of most commercial pipelines: not clip quality, but continuity across shots.</p><p>It is also the capability where competition is most direct. HappyHorse 1.1's headline upgrade is R2V, or Reference-to-Video, which accepts multiple character reference images to hold identity stable across generated footage — the same problem, approached at the input layer rather than through agentic clip chaining. Alibaba also claims zero-drift lip sync and has specifically targeted the artifacts that mark commercial AI video as synthetic, including facial oiliness and over-sharpening. Character consistency is where this category is being contested, and both companies know it.</p><p>BFL says FLUX 3 Video is already particularly strong at human facial expressions, associating sounds with physical events, and multilingual output. On the image side, the company says preliminary evaluations conducted during midtraining show significant improvement over earlier FLUX versions in complex prompt handling and text generation, including high-accuracy text in multiple languages. It published no image benchmarks or win rates.</p><h2><b>FLUX-mimic tests whether video models can become robot models</b></h2><p>BFL is applying its unified-architecture thesis through FLUX-mimic, a video-action model built on FLUX 3 and developed with Swiss firm Mimic Robotics, one of the first partners to receive early access.</p><p>The technical blog describes two distinct routes to action prediction: integrating native action prediction directly into FLUX 3, scaling up the initial Self-Flow work; and using the pretrained video backbone as a dynamics-aware foundation from which specialized action models can be finetuned with limited task-specific data. FLUX-mimic is the second route — the FLUX 3 backbone combined with mimic's robot-learning and production-deployment expertise in dexterous manipulation.</p><p>FLUX-mimic is designed for general-purpose robotic manipulation: helping robots understand a visual scene, predict the consequences of an action, and adapt to new tasks with far less task-specific data. </p><p>BFL and Mimic Robotics say that depending on task difficulty, the model can be finetuned for a specific manipulation task with as little as 30 minutes of robot data, where prior approaches have required 30 or more hours.</p><p>"The hardest part of robotics is data," said Elvis Nava, CTO of Mimic Robotics, in a statement provided to VentureBeat. "Every new task normally means hours of a robot repeating itself. Because FLUX-mimic is built on top of frontier video models that already understand how the physical world behaves, it picks up a new task in minutes, not days. This way, we can leapfrog the current state of the art in robot learning."</p><p>BFL<!-- --> argues that a model trained only on images cannot understand a world that "moves, sounds, changes, and responds," and that physical understanding is what produces convincing generated footage. Google makes a nearly identical claim for Gemini Omni. </p><p>Its developer documentation cites "world knowledge" that combines "an understanding of physics" with Gemini's grasp of history, science and cultural context. Its marketing is blunter still: "Most AI models just predict the next pixel to build a narrative or an image. Gemini Omni is different," the company posted in June, crediting the model with "an intuitive understanding of forces like gravity, kinetic energy, and fluid dynamics for more realistic movements that follow real-world logic." </p><p>The practical consequence for enterprise buyers is that world-model language is not a differentiator. Two of the three leading video systems now market physical understanding as their central advantage, and neither has published a benchmark that measures it. </p><p>There is no standard test for whether generated water behaves like water, whether a dropped object falls at a plausible rate, or whether a sound arrives when the impact does. Human preference ratings capture some of it indirectly. Nothing else on offer captures it at all.</p><h2><b>Open weights helped make FLUX an industry standard</b></h2><p>BFL<a href="https://venturebeat.com/technology/s"> officially launched in summer 2024 </a>and gained a name for itself in the AI industry in the intervening two years for its commitment to open sourcing high-quality AI image models beloved by developers, creatives, and enterprises. </p><p>The company's founders, including Rombach, Andreas Blattmann and Patrick Esser, previously helped create VQGAN, latent diffusion and <a href="https://venturebeat.com/business/stable-diffusion-creators-launch-black-forest-labs-secure-31m-for-flux-1-ai-image-generator">Stable Diffusion</a>, the latter the open source technology that kicked off broad AI generation capabilities for the masses and currently used by many AI image generators and companies. </p><p>That reach translated into commercial distribution. FLUX models now power generative features inside Adobe Photoshop, Picsart and Nous Research's Hermes Agent, among other platforms, and the company cites film director Martin Scorsese among professional users.</p><p><a href="https://www.wired.com/story/black-forest-labs-ai-image-generation/"><i>Wired</i></a> magazine described Black Forest Labs as a relatively small company that nevertheless became a leading competitor to Silicon Valley's largest AI labs, with FLUX models ranking near the top of image benchmarks and becoming some of the most downloaded text-to-image models on AI code sharing community Hugging Face. The company says it now runs a 100-person team across Freiburg and San Francisco.</p><p>FLUX.1 Dev, FLUX.1 Kontext Dev, FLUX.1 Fill Dev and related control models, <a href="https://venturebeat.com/business/black-forest-labs-releases-flux-1-1-pro-and-an-api">released shortly after the firm's launch,</a>  gave researchers and creative-tool developers access to downloadable checkpoints, local inference and integrations with frameworks including Hugging Face Diffusers and ComfyUI. FLUX.1 Kontext Dev, for example, was released as an open-weight model for research and noncommercial use, with generated outputs permitted for commercial purposes under the applicable license.</p><p>The company continued that pattern with <a href="https://venturebeat.com/ai/black-forest-labs-launches-flux-2-ai-image-models-to-challenge-nano-banana">FLUX.2 Dev</a> in late 2025, a 32-billion-parameter open-weight model combining generation and multi-reference editing. Black Forest Labs called it the strongest open-weight image generation and editing model available at launch and released weights, reference inference code and optimized implementations for consumer Nvidia GPUs.</p><p>FLUX 3 Dev raises the stakes on that evaluation. Previous Dev releases were image models. This one is described as a multimodal backbone spanning video, audio, image and action prediction — meaning a single license will govern whether a company can locally deploy a model that touches both content production and physical machinery.  BFL hasn't yet shared information about its license, the parameter count, quantizations or hardware requirements.</p><p>The company frames open weights as an enterprise feature rather than a community gesture, arguing they enable secure, low-latency local deployment for applications like robotic control systems and let teams adapt FLUX 3 to their own data, products and workflows. </p><p>The financial backing behind FLUX 3 is worth noting alongside the technical claims. Black Forest Labs is valued at $3.25 billion and has raised more than $450 million from investors including a16z, AMP, Salesforce Ventures, Nvidia, General Catalyst, Adobe Ventures, Figma Ventures, Canva and Deutsche Telekom's T.Capital.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[These 3 Fire TV Sticks are on sale at Best Buy - here's the one I recommend (and why)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Fire TV Sticks are back down to all-time low prices for Best Buy's Black Friday in July sale. We'll break down just how good of a deal you can get.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3690006/it-nachrichten/these-3-fire-tv-sticks-are-on-sale-at-best-buy-heres-the-one-i-recommend-and-why/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3690006/it-nachrichten/these-3-fire-tv-sticks-are-on-sale-at-best-buy-heres-the-one-i-recommend-and-why/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:48:04 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Fire TV Sticks are back down to all-time low prices for Best Buy's Black Friday in July sale. We'll break down just how good of a deal you can get.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[EU gives antritrust approval to the Saudi-led $55 billion takeover of EA]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The deal isn't done yet, but it's getting closer.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689915/it-nachrichten/eu-gives-antritrust-approval-to-the-saudi-led-55-billion-takeover-of-ea/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689915/it-nachrichten/eu-gives-antritrust-approval-to-the-saudi-led-55-billion-takeover-of-ea/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:06:03 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The deal isn't done yet, but it's getting closer.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Anthropic's Massive New AMD Deal Raises the Stakes for Nvidia]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[AMD has signed a multibillion-dollar AI infrastructure deal with Anthropic, expanding its challenge to Nvidia while supporting future Claude AI deployments.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689844/it-nachrichten/anthropics-massive-new-amd-deal-raises-the-stakes-for-nvidia/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689844/it-nachrichten/anthropics-massive-new-amd-deal-raises-the-stakes-for-nvidia/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:34:06 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[AMD has signed a multibillion-dollar AI infrastructure deal with Anthropic, expanding its challenge to Nvidia while supporting future Claude AI deployments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Schlechter Empfang trotz 5G-Tarif? Das Problem steckt oft in einer Einstellung, die fast niemand ändert]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Schlechter Handyempfang kann im Alltag richtig nerven. Gespräche brechen ab, Webseiten laden ewig oder das Smartphone zeigt plötzlich nur noch „Kein Netz“ an. Mit den richtigen Einstellungen und ein paar einfachen Tricks lässt sich der Empfang aber oft deutlich verbessern.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689835/android-tipps/schlechter-empfang-trotz-5g-tarif-das-problem-steckt-oft-in-einer-einstellung-die-fast-niemand-aendert/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689835/android-tipps/schlechter-empfang-trotz-5g-tarif-das-problem-steckt-oft-in-einer-einstellung-die-fast-niemand-aendert/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:29:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Schlechter Handyempfang kann im Alltag richtig nerven. Gespräche brechen ab, Webseiten laden ewig oder das Smartphone zeigt plötzlich nur noch „Kein Netz“ an. Mit den richtigen Einstellungen und ein paar einfachen Tricks lässt sich der Empfang aber oft deutlich verbessern.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[An AI now judges every move Rubrik's agents make, its AI chief said at VB Transform 2026 — but no one's measured if the judge is right]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[At a CISO roundtable organized by Anthropic's chief information security officer, Dev Rishi asked a simple question: Did everyone in the room have their AI governance and security policies written down? Every hand went up — about 14 people, by his count. His follow-up, about how anyone actually e...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689833/it-nachrichten/an-ai-now-judges-every-move-rubriks-agents-make-its-ai-chief-said-at-vb-transform-2026-but-no-ones-measured-if-the-judge-is-right/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689833/it-nachrichten/an-ai-now-judges-every-move-rubriks-agents-make-its-ai-chief-said-at-vb-transform-2026-but-no-ones-measured-if-the-judge-is-right/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:49 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a CISO roundtable organized by Anthropic's chief information security officer, Dev Rishi asked a simple question: Did everyone in the room have their AI governance and security policies written down? Every hand went up — about 14 people, by his count. His follow-up, about how anyone actually enforces those policies in practice, got a different response. "And everybody chuckled," Rishi, the GM of AI at <a href="https://www.rubrik.com/company">Rubrik</a>, recalled at <a href="https://venturebeat.com/vbtransform2026">VB Transform 2026</a> fireside chat in Menlo Park. "It was like the dirty secret in the room that everyone has these policies, but no way to actually make them real."</p><p>“Our founder and CTO has actually been really pushing to enable our agents in YOLO mode,” Rishi told the audience. That admission comes from a publicly traded data security firm whose business is backing up what he called the most important data in the world.</p><p>YOLO mode strips the permission prompt out of agent workflows and lets the agent act on its own. In Rubrik's version, a second AI judges every action in real time against policy in place of a human clicking approve. Rubrik is running the experiment on itself first. Rishi treats autonomy as a settled capability question and an open judgment question. "If you ask the agent to act autonomously, it will," he said. "It's a question that you have internally. Should it?"</p><p>Rubrik earned that question the hard way. When <a href="https://claude.com/product/claude-code">Claude Code</a> and <a href="https://www.anthropic.com/product/claude-cowork">Cowork</a> pilots rolled out, the company required every command to run in ask mode so the employee issuing it carried the liability, and the developer pushback filled a single Slack thread 120 messages deep. </p><p>"The developers basically are pushing back, and they're like, this is like the iTunes service agreement. I'm just hitting check, check, check, check, check, check, check," Rishi said. "There's no way that I can actually read through this. And it becomes security theater." Roughly 80% of respondents are in the same bind, Rishi said, citing <a href="https://www.rubrik.com/company/newsroom/press-releases/26/as-agentic-ai-adoption-accelerates-rubrik-warns-of-growing-security-gaps">Rubrik Zero Labs research</a> that found monitoring and approving agent actions takes more time than the agents save. The State of the Agent, the April report behind that figure, surveyed more than 1,600 IT and security leaders.</p><p>SAGE is the reason Rubrik trusts the bet. Short for Semantic AI Governance Engine, SAGE is the arbitration layer inside <a href="https://www.rubrik.com/products/rubrik-agent-cloud">Rubrik Agent Cloud</a> that watches every action an agent takes and reads the semantic intent behind it, then rules the action in or out against policies written in natural language. "We took what people said was human in the loop, a good idea, and we replaced it with AI in the loop," Rishi said, describing the pitch to security chiefs he characterized as skittish about non-deterministic systems.</p><h2>Security approval, not cost, blocks AI ROI</h2><p>Rishi’s path to Rubrik ran through <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2025/06/25/rubrik-acquires-predibase-to-accelerate-adoption-of-ai-agents/">Predibase</a>, the generative AI infrastructure startup he co-founded and ran as CEO until Rubrik agreed to acquire it in June 2025. Before that, he led ML product at Google on the team that became Vertex AI, served as Kaggle's first product manager as it grew from about one million to ten million users, and holds bachelor's and master's degrees in computer science from Harvard. </p><p>Over roughly his first three and a half months at Rubrik, Rishi set up 200 customer conversations with IT and security leaders across a customer base that looks like the Global 2000, asking open-ended questions about cost, latency, performance, and orchestration. "Pretty consistently, what I heard through all of those conversations was that all of those are pretty secondary," he said. "The main challenge is actually, how do I get this approved from a security and risk standpoint? I'm concerned about all the different things that could go wrong. Actually, I felt like that was one of the biggest things constraining ROI."</p><p><a href="https://venturebeat.com/orchestration/wall-street-is-debating-the-ai-buildout-enterprises-just-answered-86-say-their-gpus-run-at-half-capacity-or-less">VentureBeat Pulse research</a> presented on the Transform stage earlier in the day confirms the gap Rishi kept hearing. Two-thirds of enterprises, 66%, already allow or are actively building toward production deployment with zero human review, yet only 5% fully trust the automated evaluations that would make that decision. </p><h2>One AI reading what the rulebook can't</h2><p>Rubrik's own policies exposed why written rules fail as enforcement. One internal rule states that agents should respect Rubrik's customer data use policy, which sounds enforceable until someone tries. "Rubrik's customer data use policy is like a three-page document of legal text," Rishi said. "I have no idea how to write that in there as a rule." Asked on stage how a team of AI infrastructure people took on a problem that security engineers own, Rishi answered, "with a lot of naivety and innocence, honestly." His team bet that models good at understanding language could police other models, and SAGE became the answer.</p><p>The case for putting a model in the judgment seat comes down to precision. A rule like "agents should not be able to edit revenue fields in Salesforce" fails in conventional tooling because Salesforce does not delineate which fields count as revenue, Rishi explained, so administrators fall back on approving every Salesforce action by hand. SAGE reads the intent instead and acts as a judge, carrying organizational context, which can tell a benign lookup from the edit the policy prohibits.</p><p>Keeping the judge small is what makes the economics work. <!-- -->SAGE runs on a small language model that Rishi said operates at an order of magnitude lower cost and latency than a frontier LLM. "If I told you, don't worry, you're gonna be secure and governed, but I'm gonna double your cost and latency, you would tell me to get out of the room," Rishi said.</p><p>When Rishi asked who in the audience had worried about token consumption over the past year, half the hands went up. "And I guess the other half is probably just too lazy to raise their hand," he said.</p><p>SAGE is an aggregation of judges based on parameter-efficient fine-tuning that Rubrik uses to take on task-specific variants of a base model with shared organizational context. One judge watches for tool-use hallucinations while another suppresses PII before it can leave, each running as its own enforceable policy. Security and GRC teams have started writing financial rules into the same layer, including one internal policy barring AI spend on personal projects.</p><h2>The lethal trifecta</h2><p>Asked which attacks worry him most, Rishi pointed at the <a href="https://simonwillison.net/2025/Jun/16/the-lethal-trifecta/">lethal trifecta</a>, the term security researcher Simon Willison coined in June 2025 for an agent that holds private data while taking in content nobody vetted, with a channel to send what it finds to the outside world. The danger, according to Rishi, is what happens when individually legitimate permissions stack. An agent granted Salesforce access and email access on an employee's credentials has done nothing wrong yet, with <i>yet</i> being the operative word. "A very simple example is that an agent can start pulling data from Salesforce and then decide to accidentally leak and exfiltrate that out via an email," he told the audience. A financial services company he met the morning of the session made the point for him, telling Rishi that none of the individual permissions are bad on their own and the agent needs every one of them to do its job. "It should have permission to each of those systems, but it's the combination that ends up becoming really destructive," Rishi said.</p><p>Traditional identity and access management never priced in that combination because it relied on the judgment of the employee holding the credentials, Rishi argued, and agents supply none. "I can tell you the number of times Claude Code has tried to leak some of our sensitive source code to a public GitHub repository is incredibly high," he said. Cutting agents off from public resources entirely would defeat their purpose, which returns the problem to adjudicating intent in context rather than revoking access.</p><p>A separate <a href="https://venturebeat.com/security/shared-api-keys-expose-ai-agent-fleets-venturebeat-research">VentureBeat June Pulse survey</a> of 107 qualified enterprise respondents maps the blast radius of exactly this pattern. On the Transform stage that morning, VentureBeat research reported that 69% of companies run credential sharing somewhere in their agent fleet. Companies with shared credentials anywhere got hit more often, reporting a security incident or near-miss at a 63.5% rate (47 of 74), against 40.9% (9 of 22) where every agent carries its own scoped identity.</p><h2>The attacks no single turn reveals</h2><p>Rubrik Agent Cloud reached <a href="https://www.rubrik.com/blog/company/26/2/introducing-rubrik-agent-cloud-control-your-agents-with-ai">general availability in February</a>, though not everything Rishi described ships in it yet. Backtesting is just starting to roll out. The feature replays an organization's historical agent actions and tool calls against a new policy, showing where the policy would have stepped in and where an action would have sailed through uncaught, with policy edits applied in real time. Rishi called that archive one of the most valuable data troves an enterprise holds.</p><p>Real-time detection and blocking turn out to be the entry point rather than the whole product. Some attacks never trip a single-action rule. "No individual turn of the conversation was problematic, but if you took the session as a full trace, that ended up being problematic," Rishi said. Agent Cloud runs batch analysis across entire session traces every hour or every day and surfaces what Rubrik calls insights, the problems no individual guardrail caught. The same Zero Labs report found that 88% say they lack the ability to roll back agent actions without system disruption, a recovery gap that sits squarely in Rubrik's original line of business.</p><p>A skeptical CISO will ask the question the fireside did not answer. SAGE is a non-deterministic model policing other non-deterministic models, and Rishi offered no false positive or false negative rate for the judge itself. The closest thing the architecture gives to an answer is auditability, since backtesting and the batch insights both leave a human-reviewable trail of each call SAGE made and whatever got past it. Who watches the watcher, for now, is a trail of receipts rather than a benchmark. Until that benchmark exists, AI in the loop stays an operational wager rather than a quantified control.</p><p>Three questions fall out of the session for security teams. How many of the guardrails now in production depend on a human clicking approve, and what happens to that workload as agent count grows? Does anything in the stack enforce semantic intent, or is it all allow and deny lists? And can the team backtest agent behavior against a new policy, then unwind a multi-turn session without taking systems down?</p><p>Rishi's timing has a market behind it. In the same VentureBeat research, 82% of enterprises still name their primary AI provider's built-in guardrails and cloud controls as their main agent security layer, and 59% plan to adopt, add, or replace agent security tooling within the next 12 months. Only 12% include an agent-identity product in what they are considering, even with credential sharing still the norm. Every CISO at that Anthropic roundtable had a policy document and no enforcement mechanism, and Rubrik built a product for the space between the two. YOLO mode is the bet that an AI watching other AIs can finally make the policies real.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Agentic orchestration: Enterprise AI organizations have a deployment problem, not a platform problem — and most are calling chatbots agents]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 101 enterprises, agent orchestration is consolidating onto model-provider platforms — Anthropic’s Claude leads by a wide margin — chosen for the gravity of the underlying model and judged on reliable multi-step execution. But the ambition runs well ahead of the reality: most deployed “agen...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689830/it-nachrichten/agentic-orchestration-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-deployment-problem-not-a-platform-problem-and-most-are-calling-chatbots-agents/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689830/it-nachrichten/agentic-orchestration-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-deployment-problem-not-a-platform-problem-and-most-are-calling-chatbots-agents/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:45 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 101 enterprises, agent orchestration is consolidating onto model-provider platforms — Anthropic’s Claude leads by a wide margin — chosen for the gravity of the underlying model and judged on reliable multi-step execution. But the ambition runs well ahead of the reality: most deployed “agents” are still chatbot wrappers, the control plane enterprises expect is deliberately hybrid to avoid lock-in, and real-time fiscal control over token burn remains the exception.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines enterprise agent orchestration: which platforms enterprises run on, what drives the choice, what they optimize for, how they expect agent control to be structured, and — most revealingly — how orchestrated their deployed “agents” actually are and how tightly they control the cost of running them.</p><p>The central finding is a gap between orchestration ambition and orchestration reality. Enterprises are consolidating fast onto the major model platforms: Anthropic’s Claude is the primary platform for 40%, more than double any rival, followed by Microsoft (18%) and OpenAI (13%). The choice is driven by “model gravity” — native alignment with a state-of-the-art base model (21%) — and success is judged by reliable, multi-step execution (task completion reliability 32%, multi-step workflow management 28%). Yet asked to assess their portfolios honestly, 71% say a quarter or fewer of their deployed “agents” are true multi-step orchestrated workflows rather than single-prompt chatbot wrappers, and only 10% have crossed the halfway mark. The orchestration layer is being built well ahead of the orchestrated portfolio it is meant to run.</p><p>That gap shapes the architecture enterprises are putting in place. By the end of 2026 a clear majority (51%) expect a hybrid control plane — provider-native plus external orchestration — and only 6% expect to hand control to a provider-managed service, because vendor lock-in (35%) is the risk they fear most if control lives inside a model provider. Investment follows the build-out: agent workflow tooling leads the spend (34%), with security and permissions enforcement (25%) behind. And fiscal control lags throughout — more than a quarter (27%) have no real-time way to stop a runaway agent before the bill arrives.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this instrument focused on enterprise agent orchestration. Responses are filtered to organizations with 100 or more employees (n=101), drawn from a single June 2026 wave; because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends.</p><p>By organization size the sample is spread evenly across the enterprise bands: 100–499 employees, 2,500–9,999, and 50,000+ (21% each), with 10,000–49,999 and 500–2,499 (19% each). By role it is senior and buyer-credible: product and program managers (15%), CIO/CTO/CISO (13%), consultants and advisors (13%), and a spread of data, AI, and engineering directors and VPs, with an “Other” function at 18%. On purchasing, 81% are recommenders, influencers, or final decision-makers for AI solutions (66% recommender/influencer, 15% final decision-maker). Technology/Software is the largest industry at 44%, followed by Financial Services (17%) and Healthcare/Life Sciences (8%).</p><p>At 101 respondents the sample is robust enough to read directionally with reasonable confidence, though it remains self-selected and is not a probability sample.</p><h2>Finding 1: Orchestration runs on model-provider platforms</h2><p><b>Anthropic’s Claude leads; open frameworks are marginal</b></p><p>We asked which agent orchestration platform enterprises primarily use today. The answer concentrates on the major model providers — and on one in particular.</p><div></div><p>A note on reading these shares. As described in the methodology section, the respondents are self-selected, and this question asked them for a single primary platform — so the figures measure which platform leads each enterprise's deployment, within a self-selected audience of AI-active technical decision-makers. A sample built this way can diverge substantially from spend-weighted market measures, and each VB Pulse survey draws its own sample with its own company-size mix, so vendor figures should not be compared across our surveys either. Read these shares as a portrait of where this cohort has placed its primary orchestration bet today, rather than as market share.</p><p>The model platforms dominate. Anthropic, Microsoft, OpenAI, Google, and Amazon together account for roughly 80% of deployments (81 of 101), while the open frameworks (LangChain/LangGraph) and custom in-house builds that anchor engineering discussion sit in single digits. Anthropic’s lead — 40%, more than double the next platform — mirrors the “model gravity” selection logic in Finding 2: enterprises are choosing the orchestration layer that comes with the model they want to build on. As with the security vendors in the prior agent-security wave, the tools that define the category in technical circles are not yet where enterprise deployment concentrates. A small 3% are not orchestrating at all.</p><p>Respondents rate the platforms they run at 3.94 out of 5 overall (109 answered), with “value for money” specifically at 3.94 and “ease of implementation” the weakest score, at 3.85 — placing orchestration near the bottom of our five-tracker satisfaction range, ahead of only evaluation tooling. A rating just under 4 out of 5, from users of whom 96% plan to change their orchestration approach within the year, reads as provisional acceptance: the platforms work well enough to run today, and not well enough to stop the search for something better. The ratings sit alongside near-universal intent to change; this is a layer enterprises tolerate more than they love.</p><h2>Finding 2: Model gravity drives platform selection</h2><p><b>The base model, not the tooling, decides the platform</b></p><p>We asked what most influenced the orchestration platform choice. The single largest factor is the pull of the underlying model — though flexibility and ease of development follow close behind.</p><div></div><p>Model gravity leading is the selection-side explanation for Anthropic’s platform lead: enterprises pick the orchestration environment closest to the frontier model they have standardized on. But the next tier complicates the picture — flexibility across models and tools (17%) and ease of development (17%) say enterprises also want to avoid being trapped by that choice, foreshadowing the lock-in fear in Finding 6. Security and permissions (14%) and total cost of ownership (11%) round out a pragmatic buying logic. Performance (latency/memory) sits last at 4%, a reminder that at this stage of adoption the binding constraints are model fit and optionality, not raw speed.</p><h2>Finding 3: The job is reliable multi-step execution</h2><p><b>Enterprises just orchestration by whether it completes the work</b></p><p>We asked what enterprises optimize for — their primary success metric for orchestration. Reliability and multi-step workflow management dominate; developer- and user-facing metrics trail.</p><div></div><p>Task completion reliability (32%) and multi-step workflow management (28%) together account for 59% of responses (60 of 101): orchestration succeeds, in the enterprise view, when it reliably carries a task through multiple steps to completion. Developer productivity (17%) matters but is secondary — the inverse of its prominence in framework discussion — and end-user experience (9%) is a minor concern, consistent with orchestration being an internal execution problem rather than a UX one. This reliability-first standard is exactly what makes the Chatbot Trap finding so pointed: enterprises define success as dependable multi-step execution, yet most of their deployed “agents” do not yet do multi-step work at all.</p><p>The trap is not evenly distributed. Splitting the sample by organization size, 77% of smaller enterprises say a quarter or fewer of their agents do true multi-step work, against 62% of larger ones. Larger enterprises are meaningfully further into genuine multi-step deployment; the chatbot trap is, directionally, a mid-market condition.</p><h2>Finding 4: Consolidate, productionize, and build in-house </h2><p><b>Three strategic moves are nearly tied for the year ahead</b></p><p>We asked what major change enterprises anticipate in their orchestration strategy over the next 12 months. Three moves cluster at the top, almost evenly split.</p><div></div><p>The top three — building in-house control (25%), standardizing on one framework (24%), and moving agents from sandbox to production (23%) — are statistically indistinguishable and tell a single story: enterprises are moving from experimentation to operational consolidation. They want fewer frameworks, more production exposure, and more ownership of the control layer; only 4% expect no change. The appetite for custom in-house control planes is notable alongside the platform concentration in Finding 1 — enterprises are standardizing on model-provider platforms while simultaneously planning to wrap them in control logic they own, the hybrid posture that Finding 6 makes explicit.</p><h2>Finding 5: Nearly seven in 10 plan to switch — and the biggest group of movers has no shortlist </h2><p>The strategic change enterprises anticipate (previous finding) comes with vendor motion attached. Asked whether they plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent orchestration platform in the next twelve months, more respondents are moving here than in any other layer we track.</p><div></div><p>Asked which platforms they are considering, the most common answer among those in motion is none yet: 29% of all respondents are evaluating without a shortlist, the largest single response after "not considering a change." Among named candidates, OpenAI leads at 16%, followed by LangChain/LangGraph at 12% and Anthropic at 7% — and notably, the independent frameworks draw roughly double their current usage footprint in forward consideration, the same pattern our security tracker found for specialist vendors. Read with this report's concentration and lock-in findings, the picture completes itself: the major model-platform providers hold roughly four-fifths of today's primary usage, vendor lock-in has become the leading fear, 96% anticipate a strategic change — and now the purchase intent to act on all of it, with the largest bloc of buyers still undecided. The most concentrated layer of the agentic stack is also, as of June, the least settled.</p><h2>Finding 6: Investment flows to workflow tooling</h2><p><b>Tooling and permissions lead the spend; monitoring trails</b></p><p>We asked which orchestration-related investment will grow most next year. Agent workflow tooling leads, with security and permissions enforcement behind.</p><div></div><p>Workflow tooling leading (34%) is the budget-side expression of the reliability-and-multi-step priority in Finding 3: the money is going to the machinery that strings steps together dependably. Security and permissions enforcement (25%) and scaling infrastructure (20%) follow — the investments required to take agents from sandbox into production, the strategic move in Finding 4. Monitoring and debugging draws a smaller 11%, with another 11% reporting flat budgets. The weight on tooling, permissions, and scaling over pure observability signals that enterprises are spending to build and harden orchestration, not merely to watch it run.</p><h2>Finding 7: The control plane will be hybrid — and lock-in is why</h2><p><b>Enterprises expect to split control between providers and their own layer</b></p><p>We asked where enterprises expect the primary control plane for agents to live by the end of 2026, and what worries them most if that control sits inside a model-provider platform. A clear majority expect a hybrid model — and vendor lock-in is the reason.</p><div></div><p>Hybrid control is the dominant expectation by a wide margin (51%), and only 6% expect to hand control to a provider-managed service outright. Read together, the hybrid, custom, and externally-abstracted options — every architecture that keeps control at least partly outside the provider — sum to 88% (89 of 101). The reason surfaces directly when we asked about the risk of provider-resident control: vendor lock-in leads at 35% (35 of 101), ahead of security and permissioning limitations (28%) and inflexibility across models and tools (21%). The pattern echoes the prior wave’s “don’t trust the model to police itself” posture — here, enterprises will build on a provider’s platform but decline to be governed entirely by it. The hybrid control plane is the architectural hedge against the lock-in they most fear.</p><p>The June figure asserting a preference for a hybrid control plane marks movement from earlier. In the April–May survey (n=145), only 34% expected a hybrid control plane, and a greater number (12%) expected to hand control fully to a provider-managed service. These two snapshots don’t yet measure a confirmed longitudinal trend — but the direction of the conversation is unambiguous: toward keeping control.</p><p>Lock-in is also a new arrival as a top concern. In the April–May wave, the leading concern was security and permissioning limitations (32%), with lock-in second at 24%; by June the two had traded places. The worry about provider platforms appears to be maturing from whether they can be secured to whether they can be replaced.</p><h2>Finding 8: The chatbot trap — most “agents” aren’t agents yet</h2><p><b>Enterprises admit most deployments are still chatbot wrappers</b></p><p>We asked enterprises to assess their portfolios honestly: what share of their deployed “agents” are true multi-step orchestrated workflows versus simple single-prompt chatbot wrappers. The answer is the defining finding of this wave.</p><div></div><p>This is the gap at the center of the report. Combining the bottom two bands, 71% of enterprises (72 of 101) say a quarter or fewer of their deployed “agents” are genuinely orchestrated — and just 10% (10 of 101) have crossed the halfway mark. The ambition documented in the earlier findings — model-provider platforms, reliability-first success metrics, production rollouts, a deliberate control architecture — runs well ahead of the deployed reality, which remains overwhelmingly single-prompt assistants dressed as agents. This is less a contradiction than a roadmap: the platforms, budgets, and strategies are being put in place precisely because the orchestrated portfolio is still so thin. The open question for later waves is how fast the reality closes on the ambition.</p><h2>Finding 9: Fiscal control is still reactive</h2><p><b>Only a minority can stop a runaway agent before the bill arrives</b></p><p>Finally, we asked how enterprises enforce fiscal control over agent token consumption — the risk that an autonomous loop exhausts a budget before anyone intervenes. Most rely on native caps or after-the-fact monitoring; real-time programmatic control is the exception.</p><div></div><p>More than a quarter of enterprises (27%) admit they have no real-time, programmatic way to stop an agent before a budget-breaking bill arrives — they learn of it from the logs afterward. Another 32% lean entirely on the native caps and throttles built into their primary platform, a control only as good as the provider’s tooling and one that ties back to the lock-in concern of Finding 6. The enterprises building custom gateways (23%) or exploiting cross-model routing to arbitrage cost (19%) are the ones treating token burn as an engineering problem to be controlled deterministically. As with orchestration maturity, fiscal control is an area where the operational reality lags the ambition: agents are moving toward production faster than the cost-control plane around them is being built.</p><p>It’s worth noting, a split appears according to company size: roughly one in three enterprises under 2,500 employees (34%) exercises only reactive control of agent spend, against 20% of larger enterprises — directional figures, but consistent with the chatbot-trap split. The mid-market is running the least mature agents on the least instrumented budgets.</p><h2>The bottom line: The layer is real; most of the agents aren't yet</h2><p>Organizations with 100 or more employees describe an orchestration strategy that is consolidating quickly and maturing slowly. They are standardizing — for now — on model-provider platforms, which collectively hold roughly four-fifths of primary usage, chosen for the gravity of the underlying model, and they judge success by reliable multi-step execution. Investment is flowing to workflow tooling and permissions, the strategy is to consolidate frameworks and push agents into production, and the control plane they expect is deliberately hybrid, because vendor lock-in is the risk they fear most. But the standardization is provisional: 68% plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement orchestration platform within twelve months — the highest switching intent of any layer we track — and the largest group of those movers has not yet shortlisted a candidate. Today's concentration describes where enterprises are, and visibly does not describe where they intend to stay.</p><p>But the honest self-assessment punctures the ambition. Seventy-one percent say a quarter or fewer of their deployed "agents" are truly orchestrated, only 10% are past the halfway mark, and more than a quarter cannot stop a runaway agent in real time. The orchestration layer — the platforms, the budgets, the control architecture — is being built ahead of the orchestrated portfolio it is meant to run. At 101 respondents in a single June wave this reads as a clear directional signal rather than a precise measurement: enterprises have decided how they want to orchestrate agents well before most of their agents are doing anything an orchestration layer is for. The questions for subsequent waves are whether the deployed reality closes the gap on the ambition — and, with nearly seven in ten buyers in motion and most of them undecided, which platforms the settled stack finally lands on.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 101 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, results read directionally rather than as a confirmed trend. Respondents include product and program managers, CIOs, CTOs and CISOs, consultants and advisors, and directors and VPs of data, AI, and engineering, across Technology/Software, Financial Services, Healthcare, and other sectors.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The agent evaluation gap: Enterprise AI organizations have a reality-alignment problem, not a coverage problem — and most are shipping to production anyway]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 157 enterprises, organizations are granting AI agents more autonomy while trusting the evaluations meant to gate that autonomy less. Half have already shipped an agent that passed their internal evaluations and then failed a customer in production; only one in twenty fully trusts automated...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689829/it-nachrichten/the-agent-evaluation-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-reality-alignment-problem-not-a-coverage-problem-and-most-are-shipping-to-production-anyway/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689829/it-nachrichten/the-agent-evaluation-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-reality-alignment-problem-not-a-coverage-problem-and-most-are-shipping-to-production-anyway/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 157 enterprises, organizations are granting AI agents more autonomy while trusting the evaluations meant to gate that autonomy less. Half have already shipped an agent that passed their internal evaluations and then failed a customer in production; only one in twenty fully trusts automated evaluation today; and the most-cited weakness is that evaluations do not align with real-world outcomes. Yet two-thirds already allow, or are actively engineering toward, deploying agent changes to production on automated evaluation alone — with no human in the loop. The result is an evaluation gap — the distance between how much autonomy enterprises are handing their agents and how far they trust the tests that are supposed to catch the failures.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines how technical leaders measure agent performance: which reliability and evaluation platforms they use, how they select and trust them, what breaks in production, and how far they are willing to let agents run without a human in the loop.</p><p>The central finding is an evaluation gap — the distance between the autonomy enterprises are granting their agents and the trust they place in the evaluations meant to govern it. Half of organizations (50%) have, in the past year, deployed an agent or LLM feature that passed their internal evaluations and then caused a customer-facing failure, and a quarter have seen it happen more than once. Trust in the tests themselves is thin: only 5% say they fully trust automated evaluation today, and the single most-cited limitation is that evaluations align poorly with real-world outcomes (29%). Enterprises are discovering that a passing eval is not the same as a working agent.</p><p>What makes the gap consequential is the direction of travel. Two-thirds of organizations (66%) already permit fully automated, zero-human-in-the-loop deployment for low-risk agents (34%) or are actively engineering their pipelines to allow it within twelve months (33%). At the same time, the evaluation stack that would have to earn that trust is fragmented and immature: the most common primary tools are the model providers’ native evals, tied with having no dedicated tooling at all (17% each); and only about a quarter of enterprises run real-time quality checks on live production traffic. The autonomy is arriving faster than the assurance.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this survey — the Agentic Reliability &amp; Evals tracker — focused on how technical leaders evaluate agent performance and reliability. Responses are filtered to organizations with 100 or more employees (n=157), drawn from a single survey in June 2026; because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Where questions were multiple-select, those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By role the sample is senior and buyer-credible: 38% are final decision-makers for AI purchases and another 34% recommenders or influencers. Product and program managers (15%), consultants and advisors (10%), directors of engineering/IT (8%), and CIOs/CTOs/CISOs (8%) lead the named titles, alongside a large “Other” function (37%). By organization size the sample is mid-market-weighted: 100–499 (37%) and 500–2,499 (27%) employees lead, with 2,500–9,999 (20%), 10,000–49,999 (10%), and 50,000+ (6%) above them. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 23%, followed by Retail/Consumer (15%), Healthcare/Life Sciences (12%), and Manufacturing (10%).</p><p>At 157 respondents the sample is large enough to read directionally but should be treated as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It skews toward the mid-market, so it is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent evaluation practices rather than from the largest operators.</p><p><i>Note: This survey was rebuilt for the June wave from the earlier “LLM observability and evaluations” survey; because the questions and sample differ, no comparisons are made to the April–May data.</i></p><h1>Finding 1: A passing eval is not a working agent</h1><p><b>Half have shipped an agent that passed evals, then failed a customer</b></p><p>We asked whether, in the past 12 months, organizations had deployed an agent or LLM feature that passed their internal evaluations but then caused a customer-facing failure. Half of those that run evaluations had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. Half of organizations (50%) have shipped an AI feature that cleared their internal evaluations and then failed in front of a customer — an incorrect output, a broken workflow, or a quality incident — and a quarter have seen it happen more than once. Only 36% report no such failure, and the remainder either run no pre-deployment evaluations (8%) or don’t track the root cause closely enough to know (6%). The failure is precise and expensive: the evaluation said the agent was ready, and it was not. Everything that follows — how enterprises trust their evals, what they monitor, and how much autonomy they grant — is shaped by this experience.</p><h2>Finding 2: Almost no one fully trusts automated evaluation</h2><p><b>The top complaint: Evals don't match real-world outcomes</b></p><p>We asked which limitation most reduces trust in automated agent evaluations today. Only a sliver of enterprises had no complaint at all.</p><div></div><p>Trust in automated evaluation is scarce, and specific. Only 5% of organizations say they fully trust automated evaluation as it stands — meaning 95% name a limitation that holds them back. The most common, at 29%, is the one that most directly explains Finding 1: evaluations align poorly with real-world outcomes, passing agents that later fail. Bias or inconsistency (21%) and a lack of explainability (18%) follow — enterprises cannot always tell why an evaluation reached its verdict — and 17% cite data-leakage or privacy concerns in the evaluation process itself. The tests meant to certify agents are not yet trusted to certify them, which is precisely why the autonomy trajectory in Finding 3 is so striking.</p><h2>Finding 3: The autonomy ceiling is rising anyway</h2><p><b>Two-thirds already allow, or are building toward, zero-human deployment</b></p><p>We asked whether organizations would let an autonomous agent deploy a code or system change to production on automated evaluation results alone, with no human-in-the-loop validation. The trajectory runs straight through the trust gap.</p><div></div><p>Here is the paradox at the heart of the report. Even though almost no one fully trusts automated evaluation (Finding 2), two-thirds of organizations (66%) either already allow zero-human-in-the-loop deployment for low-risk agents (34%) or are actively engineering their pipelines to permit it within a year (33%). Only 22% rule it out for the foreseeable future. The direction is unambiguous: enterprises are moving to let evaluations gate production autonomously — removing the human check — at the same moment they say those evaluations don’t reliably match reality. The autonomy ceiling is rising faster than the assurance beneath it, which is the mechanism by which the false-confidence failures of Finding 1 will scale rather than shrink.</p><p>Notably, the autonomy bet is not just a small company phenomenon. Splitting the sample by company size, larger enterprises are slightly further down the path toward zero human review than smaller companies (70% versus 64%) and slightly more likely to have shipped an evaluation-passing agent that then failed a customer (54% versus 48%). The assumption that large, regulated organizations are holding the human in the loop longest is, in this sample, backwards.  To be sure, these are directional figures, since the survey was not a huge sample — 57 respondents from companies with 2,500+ employees and 100 from companies smaller than that. </p><h2>Finding 4: The evaluation stack is fragmented and provider-led</h2><p><b>Provider-native evals lead — tied with no dedicated tool at all</b></p><p>We asked which agent reliability or evaluation platform enterprises primarily use today. The market has no clear leader — and a large share has nothing dedicated.</p><div></div><p>The evaluation layer is early and unconsolidated. Provider-native tooling leads — OpenAI’s native evals and traces (17%) and Anthropic’s Claude Console evals (13%) together outweigh any independent platform — but it is tied at the top by a striking answer: 17% of enterprises use no dedicated agent-evaluation tooling at all, a notable gap for organizations shipping agents to customers. The specialist evaluation vendors — DeepEval (12%), Braintrust (8%), LangSmith, Weave, Promptfoo, Langfuse, Arize — are scattered across single to low double digits, and 11% have built their own. No independent platform has yet become the category standard, which leaves most enterprises evaluating agents with provider-native tools, home-grown scripts, or nothing.</p><h2>Finding 5: Production monitoring rarely watches output quality</h2><p><b>Only a quarter run real-time quality checks on live traffic</b></p><p>Production monitoring for an AI agent can watch two very different things. It can watch whether the system is <b>functioning</b> — is the agent up and responding, did each request complete, how fast, at what cost, with any errors. Or it can watch whether the agent's output is <b>correct</b> — automated checks that evaluate the content of each answer as it goes out: did the agent give the right answer, take the right action, stay within policy. The distinction matters because a confidently wrong answer is invisible to the first kind of monitoring: the request completes, the response is fast, no error is thrown, and every functioning-metric reads healthy. We asked organizations which kind their live production monitoring is built for today.</p><div></div><p>Grouped by what is actually being watched, the split is stark: 51% of organizations monitor only whether the agent is functioning, while 23% monitor whether its answers are right. Counting the ad-hoc reviewers and the don't-knows, roughly three-quarters of organizations run no automated, real-time evaluation of output correctness in production — they can see that the system is up and what it costs, and they are taking the correctness of its answers on faith. That blind spot is the runtime counterpart to the pre-deployment gap in Finding 1: the same organizations engineering the human out of the deployment decision mostly cannot see, in real time, when the deployed agent starts getting things wrong.</p><h2>Finding 6: Bought on cost, measured on consistency</h2><p><b>Price and integration drive selection; evaluation consistency is the goal</b></p><p>We asked what most influenced enterprises’ choice of an evaluation vendor, and what they treat as their primary measure of success. Both answers are pragmatic.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises buy evaluation tooling on economics and trust it on repeatability. Cost of evaluations (28%) narrowly leads selection, just ahead of ease of integration (27%) and evaluation accuracy (24%) — breadth of observability (13%) and vendor roadmap (4%) matter far less. On what success looks like, more than a third (36%) name evaluation consistency — getting the same verdict on the same behavior every time — well ahead of speed of experimentation (19%), reduction in failures (18%), production visibility (13%), and compliance (11%). The emphasis on consistency is telling: before enterprises can trust an evaluation’s verdict, they need it to be stable — the very property whose absence (bias and inconsistency) ranked among the top trust limitations in Finding 2. Satisfaction with current tooling is only moderate, averaging 3.8 on a five-point scale across overall satisfaction, ease of implementation, and value for money.</p><h2>Finding 7: The next dollar goes to humans and observability</h2><p><b>Investment is flowing to oversight, not just automation</b></p><p>We asked which reliability and evaluation investment will grow most over the next year. The money is going toward watching agents more closely — including with people.</p><div></div><p>The second-largest planned investment — behind only production observability — is human review workflows, at 26%. Read against Finding 1, that is the report's quietest contradiction: at the same moment two-thirds of enterprises are engineering the human out of the deployment decision, more of them plan to grow spending on human reviewers (26%) than on the automated evaluation pipelines (16%) that would replace them. The zero-human trajectory and the human-review budget are rising in the same companies at the same time. Indeed, only 8% report that their budget is not increasing. </p><p>Taken together, enterprises are hedging: building toward autonomy while spending to watch agents more closely and keep humans available for the calls that automated evaluation cannot yet be trusted to make.</p><h2>Finding 8: A tooling reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>Nearly two-thirds plan to adopt or switch platforms within a year</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement evaluation platform, and which they are considering. Few intend to stand pat.</p><div></div><p>The evaluation market is wide open. While 36% have no plans to change, a clear majority (64%) intend to adopt a new, additional, or replacement platform within twelve months, and 31% within the next quarter. The consideration set points where current usage is thinnest: Confident AI’s DeepEval leads what enterprises are evaluating (20%), ahead of OpenAI’s native evals (13%) and Braintrust (9%) — the open-source specialists drawing more interest than their present footprint. </p><p>Given that so many enterprises today rely on provider-native tools or nothing at all (Finding 4), this is less a defection than a first real wave of tooling adoption — the moment the evaluation layer starts to consolidate. Which platforms earn that trust, in a market where almost no one trusts automated evaluation yet, is the open question this series will keep tracking.</p><h2>The bottom line: An evaluation gap that autonomy will widen, not close</h2><p>Organizations with 100 or more employees are granting AI agents more independence than they trust their evaluations to support. Half have already shipped an agent that passed its evals and then failed a customer; almost none fully trust automated evaluation, chiefly because it doesn’t match real-world outcomes; and most watch production for uptime and cost rather than for whether the agent’s answers are right. Yet two-thirds already allow, or are actively building toward, deploying to production on automated evaluation alone.</p><p>The vendor market is early and unsettled: the most common primary evaluation tools are provider-native evals, tied with no dedicated tooling at all, and a clear majority plan to adopt or switch platforms within the year. Encouragingly, the next dollar is going to observability and — pointedly — human review, suggesting enterprises sense the gap even as they engineer past it. At 157 respondents in a single wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: autonomy is being granted on the strength of evaluations that the people granting it do not yet trust. The evaluation gap is not a coverage problem that more tests alone will close; it is a problem of evaluations that reflect reality and can be trusted to gate it. The open question for later waves is whether assurance catches up to autonomy — or whether the false-confidence failures move from customer incidents into changes that deploy themselves.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 157 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. This is a directional read rather than a precise measurement — the sample is self-selected, not a probability sample, and skews toward the mid-market. Respondents include product and program managers, consultants and advisors, directors of engineering/IT, and CIOs/CTOs/CISOs, among other functions, across technology/software, retail/consumer, healthcare/life sciences, manufacturing, and other industries.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The AI context gap: Enterprise AI organizations have a trust problem, not a retrieval problem — and most are still building the fix]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 101 enterprises, the infrastructure that feeds AI agents their business context is being built faster than it can be trusted. Retrieval-augmented generation is already the default context source, and provider-native retrieval has quietly overtaken the dedicated vector databases that define...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689828/it-nachrichten/the-ai-context-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-trust-problem-not-a-retrieval-problem-and-most-are-still-building-the-fix/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689828/it-nachrichten/the-ai-context-gap-enterprise-ai-organizations-have-a-trust-problem-not-a-retrieval-problem-and-most-are-still-building-the-fix/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:42 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 101 enterprises, the infrastructure that feeds AI agents their business context is being built faster than it can be trusted. Retrieval-augmented generation is already the default context source, and provider-native retrieval has quietly overtaken the dedicated vector databases that define the category — yet a majority of enterprises have already watched their agents produce confident, wrong answers traced to missing or inconsistent context. A governed semantic layer is emerging as the fix, but most are still building it; the field is converging on hybrid retrieval; and even as provider-native tools lead in practice, a plurality say they intend to keep best-of-breed. The result is a context gap — agents that sound authoritative running on a foundation their owners do not yet fully trust.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines the enterprise RAG and context layer: what feeds AI agents their business context, which retrieval systems enterprises run, how they buy and measure them, where the architecture is heading, and — most revealingly — how often that context is already failing them.</p><p>The central finding is a context gap — the distance between how confidently enterprise agents answer and how reliable the context beneath them actually is. A majority of enterprises (57%) report that in the past six months their AI agents produced confident but wrong answers they traced to missing or inconsistent business context, and more than half of those said it happened more than once. This is not a fringe failure: retrieval is the primary context source for 38% of enterprises, more than any other approach, so when retrieval is thin or inconsistent, the errors it produces are wearing the agent’s authority. The infrastructure to fix it is being built — 58% already run or are building a governed semantic layer — but for most it is not yet in production.</p><p>Underneath, the market is consolidating in a direction that surprises. Provider-native retrieval — OpenAI’s file search (40%) and Google’s Vertex AI Search (38%) — already leads every dedicated vector database, and enterprises expect hybrid retrieval to dominate by the end of 2026 (34%). Yet a plurality (36%) say they intend to keep best-of-breed standalone tools rather than consolidate onto a provider’s native context stack, and a majority (57%) plan to switch or add a provider within the year. Stated preference and actual usage are pulling in opposite directions — the market is buying provider-native while insisting it wants independence.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series. This survey focused on enterprise RAG infrastructure and the context layer — the retrieval systems, semantic layers, and context sources that feed AI agents. Responses are filtered to organizations with more than 100 employees (n=101); the survey drew no responses from organizations of 100 or fewer, so the full sample qualifies. All responses are from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave, so the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Several questions were multiple-select, so those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By organization size the sample concentrates in the mid-market: 251–1,000 employees (31%) and 101–250 (31%) lead, with 1,001–5,000 (20%), 5,001–10,000 (12%), and 10,001+ (7%) above them. By role it spans managers (39%), individual contributors (27%), the C-suite (16%), and VPs and directors (14%); on purchasing authority it is buyer-credible, with 46% final decision-makers and another 26% recommenders or influencers. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 20%, followed by Healthcare/Life Sciences (11%) and a broad spread across retail, transportation, financial services, manufacturing, and education.</p><p>At 101 respondents this is a modest sample and should be read as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up RAG and context infrastructure rather than from the largest operators.</p><h2>Finding 1: Confident and wrong</h2><p><b>More than half have traced agent errors to bad context</b></p><p>We asked whether, in the past six months, enterprises had traced a confident but wrong agent answer to missing or inconsistent business context. Most had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. A majority of enterprises (57%) have already had an AI agent produce a confident, wrong answer they traced to bad context — wrong metrics, stale definitions, or missing documents — and more than half of those have seen it happen more than once. Only 28% report no such failure, and a small remainder either don’t run agents on enterprise data or don’t trace root cause closely enough to know. </p><p>The failure mode is specific and dangerous: the model is not obviously hallucinating; it is confidently wrong because the context feeding it was thin or inconsistent. Everything else in this report — what enterprises retrieve, how they govern it, and what they plan to build — is downstream of this problem.</p><h2>Finding 2: RAG is the default context source</h2><p><b>Retrieval feeds more agents than any other method</b></p><p>We asked what an enterprise’s AI agents primarily use to understand its data. Retrieval leads by a wide margin.</p><div></div><p>Retrieval is the backbone of enterprise context. For 38% of organizations, RAG over documents or a vector index is the primary way agents understand the business — nearly twice the share of the next approach, a governed semantic layer or ontology (21%). Mixed approaches (14%), direct live-system queries (10%), and long-context loading (6%) fill out the rest, and only 2% let agents run on the model’s general knowledge alone. The concentration matters in light of Finding 1: because so much enterprise context flows through retrieval, the quality of that retrieval is the quality of the answer. When RAG is the default source, thin retrieval is not an edge case — it is the main failure surface.</p><p>One approach is notable for its absence from these answers: customizing model weights, also known as fine-tuning. Every leading source of business context is injected at run time. Our most recent direct measurement of fine-tuning comes from our April–May survey wave (a separate survey, n=136), where fine-tuning capabilities ranked last of six factors in model selection at 5% — even as 26% of that sample still named fine-tuning and customization an investment they expect to grow. Fine-tuning has fallen out of the primary selection conversation; context injection is how enterprises make agents knowledgeable about their business.</p><h2>Finding 3: Provider-native retrieval already leads the vector databases</h2><p><b>OpenAI file search and vertex AI search top the dedicated tools</b></p><p>We asked which retrieval systems enterprises run in production today. The answer favors the model providers and hyperscalers over the specialists.</p><div></div><p>The dedicated vector database is no longer the center of the RAG stack. OpenAI’s file search (40%) and Google’s Vertex AI Search (38%) lead — provider-native and hyperscaler-native retrieval — ahead of every purpose-built vector database. Among the specialists, the most-used is the one enterprises already run for other reasons (Elasticsearch/OpenSearch, 20%) and the open, embedded option (pgvector, 12%); the pure-play vector databases that define the category — Weaviate, Qdrant, Pinecone, Milvus — each sit in single digits to low double digits. Notably, 13% of enterprises say they still run no production RAG at all. As with the platforms in the parallel infrastructure wave, enterprises are gravitating to retrieval that comes bundled with tools they already buy.</p><p>The shape of this finding held across both Q2 waves. In April–May (n=161), provider-built retrieval led usage there too, while every dedicated vector database remained marginal — the most-used standalone vector database peaked at 8% of that sample — and the hybrid, pluralistic future was already the consensus expectation (34% expected hybrid retrieval to dominate, with another 29% expecting multiple architectures by use case). Two waves, consistent picture: the category that coined the “vector database” term is being collected by the platforms enterprises already buy from.</p><h2>Finding 4: But they say they want to keep best-of-breed</h2><p><b>A plurality resist consolidating onto a provider’s native stack</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises will respond as model providers bundle retrieval, memory, and orchestration into their platforms. Their stated intent cuts against their current usage.</p><div></div><p>Here is the tension at the heart of the stack. Even as provider-native retrieval leads in practice (Finding 3), a plurality of enterprises (36%) say they intend to keep best-of-breed standalone tools rather than consolidate onto a provider’s native context stack — well ahead of the 21% who plan to consolidate. Another 21% expect a mix, and 9% intend to build and own the layer themselves. The gap between what enterprises run and what they say they want is the strategic question of the category: they are adopting bundled retrieval for convenience while asserting they will preserve independence. Which impulse wins — the pull of the provider bundle or the stated preference for modular control — will shape the retrieval market more than any single tool.</p><h2>Finding 5: Hybrid retrieval is the consensus bet</h2><p><b>Vector-only retrieval is already seen as insufficient</b></p><p>We asked which retrieval architecture enterprises expect to dominate their production RAG systems by the end of 2026. The field is converging — with a large share still unsure.</p><div></div><p>The architecture is settling on hybrid. A third (34%) expect hybrid retrieval — embeddings combined with reranking and access controls — to dominate their production systems by the end of 2026, three times the 11% who expect vector-only retrieval to prevail. That is a notable signal: the pure vector-search approach that launched the category is already viewed as insufficient on its own, superseded by pipelines that add reranking for accuracy and access controls for governance — the very access controls whose absence produces the failures in Finding 1. Tellingly, the second-largest answer is uncertainty: 17% simply don’t know, and another 14% expect to move beyond a dedicated vector layer entirely toward tool-first or long-context retrieval. The consensus is not a single tool but a layered pipeline — and it is not yet fully formed.</p><h2>Finding 6: The governed context layer is being built now</h2><p><b>Most run or are building a semantic layer — few in production</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises use a governed semantic or context layer to give agents and BI a shared understanding of their data. Most are on the path; fewer have arrived.</p><div></div><p>The fix for the context gap is under construction. Well over half of enterprises (58%) either run a governed semantic layer in production (25%) or are piloting and building one (34%), and a further 17% are actively evaluating — meaning three-quarters are engaged with the idea in some form. But the balance is telling: more are building than have shipped, so for most enterprises the shared, governed definition layer that would prevent the "confident but wrong" failures of Finding 1 is still a work in progress. The semantic layer is the industry’s answer to inconsistent context; this wave catches it mid-construction, ambition well ahead of production.</p><h2>Finding 7: Bought on ingestion and simplicity, watched for correctness</h2><p><b>Selection favors operability; monitoring favors correctness and security</b></p><p>We asked what matters most when enterprises choose a retrieval system, and what they track once it is running. Both answers lean practical.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises choose retrieval systems on operability. Ease of data ingestion (36%), latency and performance (32%), and operational simplicity (29%) lead the selection criteria — ahead of retrieval accuracy and access control (23% each), the two factors most directly tied to the failures in Finding 1. Once systems are running, the emphasis shifts toward trust: the most-tracked metrics are response correctness (42%) and security and access control (38%), ahead of latency (28%), operational stability (27%), and answer relevance (23%). </p><p>Satisfaction with current systems is moderately positive but not enthusiastic — on a five-point scale, overall satisfaction averages 4.0, with ease of implementation and value for money both near 3.9. Enterprises buy for how easily a system runs and watch it for whether it can be trusted.</p><h2>Finding 8: A retrieval reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>A majority plan to change providers — and the vector specialists are gaining interest</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to change or add a retrieval provider, and which they are considering. The consideration set differs from today’s stack.</p><div></div><p>The retrieval stack is not settled. While 43% have no plans to change, a small majority (57%) intend to switch or add a provider within twelve months, and a quarter (26%) within the next quarter. The consideration set is where it gets interesting: provider-native retrieval still leads what enterprises are evaluating (OpenAI 22%, Vertex AI Search 21%), but the open-source vector specialists punch above their current footprint — Qdrant (14%) and Milvus (13%) draw more switching interest than their present usage (10% and 6%) would suggest. Read with Finding 4, the picture is a market in flux: enterprises run provider-native today, are evaluating a broader field, and say they want to keep their options open. The reshuffle ahead will test whether best-of-breed intent survives contact with the convenience of the bundle.</p><h1>The bottom line: A context gap that more retrieval alone won’t close</h1><p>Organizations with more than 100 employees are wiring agents into their business faster than they can guarantee the context those agents run on. Retrieval is the default source of enterprise context, and it increasingly comes from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than the dedicated vector databases — yet a majority of enterprises have already watched agents answer confidently and wrongly because that context was thin or inconsistent. The failure is not exotic; it is the predictable result of pointing authoritative-sounding agents at an unreliable foundation.</p><p>The industry’s answer — a governed semantic layer, hybrid retrieval with reranking and access controls — is being built but is mostly not yet in production, and enterprises are pulled between the convenience of provider-native bundles and a stated preference for best-of-breed independence. At 101 respondents in a single Q2 wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: the context layer is the next contested tier of the AI stack, and right now agents are running ahead of it. The context gap is not a retrieval-volume problem that more documents or bigger indexes will solve on their own; it is a problem of governed, consistent, access-aware context. The open question for later waves is whether enterprises finish building that layer before the confident-but-wrong failures move from the lab into decisions that matter.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 101 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave. At this sample size the results should be read as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement — it's a self-selected sample, not a probability sample, and skews toward the mid-market. Respondents include managers, individual contributors, VPs/directors, and the C-suite, with strong purchasing authority, across technology, healthcare, retail, transportation, financial services, manufacturing, and education.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The agent security gap: 54% of enterprises have already had an AI agent incident, and most still let agents share credentials]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 107 enterprises, AI agents are being given real access to systems and data while the controls meant to contain them lag behind. More than half have already had a confirmed agent security incident or a near-miss; only about a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most agents s...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689827/it-nachrichten/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689827/it-nachrichten/the-agent-security-gap-54-of-enterprises-have-already-had-an-ai-agent-incident-and-most-still-let-agents-share-credentials/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 107 enterprises, AI agents are being given real access to systems and data while the controls meant to contain them lag behind. More than half have already had a confirmed agent security incident or a near-miss; only about a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most agents still share credentials; and only three in ten isolate their highest-risk agents. The security stack is overwhelmingly borrowed from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than purpose-built for agents, spending remains a thin slice of the security budget, and enterprises are evenly split on whether their defenses are keeping pace with AI-enabled attackers. The result is an agent security gap — autonomous agents proliferating faster than the identity, isolation, and enforcement controls needed to hold them.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines how enterprises secure their AI agents: what tooling they run, how they manage agent identity and isolation, what has already gone wrong, how much they spend, and whether they believe their defenses are keeping pace with AI-enabled attackers.</p><p>The central finding is an agent security gap — the distance between the autonomy enterprises are granting their agents and the controls in place to contain them. More than half of organizations (54%) have already experienced a confirmed agent security incident (18%) or a near-miss caught before harm (36%). The structural weakness beneath those numbers is identity: only about a third (32%) give every agent its own scoped, managed identity, while the rest report that some agents share credentials or that agents mostly run on shared API keys and human or service-account credentials. When agents share credentials, a single compromised or over-permissioned agent carries a wide blast radius — and only three in ten enterprises (30%) isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes to bound that radius.</p><p>What makes the gap notable is how comfortable enterprises are inside it. The security stack is overwhelmingly provider-native — OpenAI’s guardrails (51%), Google’s and Microsoft’s cloud controls, and Anthropic’s managed-agent controls dominate, while the dedicated agent-security specialists barely register — and satisfaction with that borrowed stack is high, averaging 4.2 out of 5. Yet spending remains a thin slice of the security budget, only a third of enterprises believe their AI defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers, and a clear majority plan to change tooling within the year. Enterprises are satisfied with controls they are simultaneously preparing to replace.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this instrument focused on enterprise agent security — the tooling, identity, isolation, and enforcement controls organizations use to secure autonomous AI agents. Responses are filtered to organizations with more than 100 employees (n=107; the survey’s smallest size band, 1–100 employees, is excluded), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Several questions were multiple-select, so those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By role the sample is senior and buyer-credible: 45% are final decision-makers for AI purchases and another 30% recommenders or influencers. Managers (43%), individual contributors (24%), VPs and directors (15%), and the C-suite (11%) make up the seniority mix. By organization size the sample is mid-market-weighted: 251–1,000 (42%) and 101–250 (25%) employees lead, with 1,001–5,000 (19%), 5,001–10,000 (8%), and 10,001+ (7%) above them. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 23%, followed by Manufacturing (15%), Retail/E-commerce (14%), and Healthcare/Life Sciences (13%).</p><p>At 107 respondents the sample is large enough to read directionally but should be treated as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It skews toward the mid-market, so it is best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent security rather than from the largest operators.</p><p>Satisfaction ratings are computed on the respondents who answered each rating question; the overall satisfaction score reflects 82 of the 107 qualified respondents.</p><h2>Finding 1: The incidents are already here</h2><p><b>More than half have had an agent security incident or near-miss</b></p><p>We asked whether organizations had experienced an agent security incident — a confirmed breach, or a near-miss caught before harm. Most that run agents in production had.</p><div></div><p>This is the report’s defining number. More than half of organizations (54%) have already had an agent security event — 18% a confirmed incident and 36% a near-miss caught before it caused harm. Only 42% report nothing, and a small remainder either run no agents in production or don’t track such events. That so many report near-misses rather than only confirmed incidents is telling: enterprises are catching problems, but they are catching them close to the edge. The controls examined in the rest of this report — identity, isolation, enforcement — are what determine whether the next near-miss stays a near-miss.</p><p>Exposure scales with company size, but containment does not. The incident-or-near-miss rate rises from 49% in the mid-market (companies with 101-1,000 employees) to 63% at larger enterprises (above 1,000 employees), while sandbox isolation of high-risk agents falls from 35% to 20%, and satisfaction with security tooling drops from 4.36 to 3.97. The organizations running the most agents across the most systems carry the most incidents and the least of the one control that bounds an incident's blast radius.</p><h2>Finding 2: The identity gap</h2><p><b>Only a third give every agent its own scoped identity</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises manage the identity of their AI agents — whether each agent has its own credentials, or agents share them. Full per-agent identity is the exception.</p><div></div><p>Rolled together, the overlapping answers show 69% of enterprises (74 of 107) with credential sharing somewhere in the agent fleet. Identity is the structural weakness beneath the incidents. Only about a third of enterprises (32%) give every agent its own scoped, managed identity — the precondition for least-privilege access and clean attribution. Nearly half (48%) say some agents have scoped identities but many still share credentials, and another 32% say agents mostly run on shared API keys or borrowed human and service-account credentials. (Respondents could describe more than one pattern across their agent fleet, so these overlap.) </p><p>The consequence is direct: when agents share credentials, an over-permissioned or compromised agent can act with far more reach than intended, and forensics after an incident cannot cleanly tell which agent did what. The non-human identity problem — giving every agent its own governed identity — is the single largest unfinished piece of enterprise agent security.</p><p>Moreover, a company’s agent credential posture is correlated with incidents. Organizations with credential sharing anywhere in the fleet were hit — with an incident or a near-miss in the past twelve months — at 63.5% (47 of 74). Organizations where every agent carries its own scoped identity were hit at 40.9% (9 of 22). The fully-scoped group is small, so for now the relationship is an association rather than proven causation, and the gap is concentrated in the mid-market — but within a single survey, a twenty-three point difference in incident rate suggests significance.</p><h2>Finding 3: Observe and enforce, but rarely isolate</h2><p><b>Only three in 10 sandbox their highest-risk agents</b></p><p>We asked what an organization’s agent security posture looks like in practice — whether they observe, enforce, isolate, or some combination. The control that bounds damage is the least common.</p><div></div><p>Monitoring and enforcement are reasonably common; containment is not. Roughly half of enterprises observe agent activity (47%) or enforce scoped permissions at runtime (49%), but only 30% isolate their highest-risk agents in sandboxes that bound the blast radius when the other controls fail. That ordering is backwards from a defense-in-depth standpoint: observation tells you what happened, enforcement tries to prevent it, but isolation is what limits the damage when prevention fails — and it is the control enterprises have adopted least. Combined with the identity gap in Finding 2, the picture is of agents that are watched and permissioned but rarely boxed in, which is precisely the configuration in which a single failure propagates.</p><h2>Finding 4: Security runs on borrowed, provider-native controls</h2><p><b>Guardrails from OpenAI, Google and Microsoft dominate; specialists barely register</b></p><p>We asked which agent security tooling enterprises use, and which is their primary layer. The answer favors the model providers and hyperscalers over the dedicated security vendors.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises are securing agents with tools that came bundled with their models and clouds. OpenAI’s guardrails lead at 51%, followed by Google’s and Microsoft’s cloud-native controls and Anthropic’s managed-agent controls — and when asked to name their single primary security layer, 82% name one of these provider-native offerings. The purpose-built agent-security category — Palo Alto’s Prisma AIRS, CrowdStrike, Cisco AI Defense, Zenity, HiddenLayer, Check Point’s Lakera, Okta for AI Agents, non-human identity platforms — barely registers, each in the low single digits, and only 5% run no dedicated tooling at all. As with retrieval and evaluation elsewhere in this series, the provider bundle is winning the default: enterprises reach first for the guardrails their platform ships, and the independent security layer that would address the identity and isolation gaps has not yet been adopted at scale.</p><p>The provider-default pattern is consistent across both Q2 survey waves. In April–May (n=110), usage was led by the same names — OpenAI's controls at 26%, Azure at 15%, AWS at 14%, Google at 12% — with every dedicated agent-security specialist at 3% or below and one in ten using no dedicated tooling at all. The common finding from the two surveys: Enterprises are defaulting to the solutions provided by the platform they’re using, and the specialist category vendors have yet to become big players here.</p><p>(<i>A note on reading these shares. As described in the methodology section, the respondent sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, and the usage question counted every vendor or approach a respondent has in place — so the figures measure presence in the security stack rather than spending or exclusivity. Individual vendor percentages therefore carry all the usual sample caveats. The structural pattern, however, held across both Q2 waves on two differently worded questions: provider-native and hyperscaler controls lead, and dedicated agent-security specialists remain in low single digits. Read the individual shares loosely and the pattern with confidence.)</i></p><h2>Finding 5: And enterprises are comfortable with it</h2><p><b>Satisfaction is high, even as incidents mount and identity lags</b></p><p>We asked how satisfied enterprises are with their current agent security tooling. The comfort is notably out of step with the exposure documented above.</p><div></div><p>Satisfaction with agent security tooling is high — 4.2 out of 5 overall, and 4.1 for value for money — among the most positive readings in this series. That is the striking part: enterprises are highly satisfied with a stack that is mostly borrowed provider guardrails, even though more than half have already had an incident or near-miss and only a third give their agents scoped identities. The comfort appears to rest on the convenience and low friction of provider-native controls rather than on demonstrated containment. It is a false comfort in the making — the same enterprises expressing satisfaction are, as Finding 8 shows, a clear majority planning to change tooling within the year, which suggests the confidence is thinner than the score implies.</p><h2>Finding 6: Budgets haven’t caught up</h2><p><b>Most spend under a tenth of the security budget on agents</b></p><p>We asked what share of the security budget enterprises allocate to securing AI agents. For a fast-emerging risk, the allocation is modest.</p><div></div><p>Spending on agent security is still a thin slice. The most common allocation is 6–10% of the security budget (46%), and a third of enterprises (34%) spend 5% or less; only a quarter (24%) devote more than a tenth. Given the incident rate in Finding 1 and the identity and isolation gaps in Findings 2 and 3, the budget looks like a lagging indicator — the risk has arrived faster than the funding to address it. The enterprises spending more than a tenth of their security budget on agents are a distinct minority, and they are likely the ones building the scoped-identity and isolation controls the rest have not.</p><h1>Finding 7: The arms race is even, at best</h1><p><b>Only a third think their AI defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers</b></p><p>We asked how enterprises assess the balance between their AI-enabled defenses and AI-enabled attackers. Confidence is far from settled.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises are split on whether they are winning. Only about a third (35%) believe their AI-enabled defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers; the rest are less sure — 32% call it roughly even, 21% think attackers are ahead, and another 21% say it is too early to tell. Taken together, a clear majority (53%) rate the balance as even or tilted toward the attacker. That uncertainty sits uneasily beside the high satisfaction of Finding 5: enterprises are content with their tooling yet unconvinced it is winning the contest it exists to win. In a domain where the offense is also compounding with AI, an even race is not a comfortable place to be.</p><h2>Finding 8: A security reshuffle is coming</h2><p><b>Nearly six in 10 plan to adopt or switch tooling within a year</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises plan to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent security solution, and which they are considering. Few intend to stand pat.</p><div></div><p>The security stack is not settled. While 41% have no plans to change, a clear majority (59%) intend to adopt a new, additional, or replacement agent security solution within twelve months, and 29% within the next quarter — a strong signal that, high satisfaction notwithstanding, enterprises know the current stack is provisional. Incidents are what start the buying cycle. </p><p>Among organizations that have been hit, 42.1% plan to adopt, add, or replace agent security tooling within the next ninety days, against 14.0% of organizations with no incident — and after a confirmed incident it becomes majority behavior, at 52.6%. Getting hit also changes the threat assessment: 33.3% of hit organizations say AI-armed attackers are ahead of their defenses, against 8.0% of the unhit. Experience, in this data, is the strongest predictor of both urgency and pessimism.</p><p>The consideration set still leans provider-native (OpenAI 34%, Google 30%, Anthropic 29%, Azure 25%), but the dedicated security vendors — Cloudflare, Cisco, Palo Alto, Okta, Check Point’s Lakera — draw early interest in the mid-to-high single digits, more than their current footprint. </p><p>What the shopping does not yet include is the identity layer specifically. Twelve percent of the respondents include an agent-identity product — Okta for AI Agents, Microsoft Entra Agent ID, or a non-human identity platform — anywhere in their consideration set, and among the credential-sharing organizations that have already had an incident, identity consideration is essentially unchanged, at roughly one in ten. The control most directly implicated by the incident data is the one largely missing from the purchase plans. Whether this wave hardens the provider-native default or finally opens the door to purpose-built agent security — the identity and isolation controls the incidents call for — is the question this series will keep tracking.</p><h2>The bottom line: A security gap that autonomy will test first</h2><p>Organizations with more than 100 employees are giving AI agents real reach into systems and data while securing them with controls built for something else. More than half have already had an incident or near-miss; only a third give every agent its own scoped identity, and most still share credentials; only three in ten isolate their highest-risk agents; and the stack doing this work is overwhelmingly borrowed from the model providers and hyperscalers rather than purpose-built for agents.</p><p>The uncomfortable pairing is confidence with exposure: satisfaction with the current tooling is among the highest in this series, yet spending is a thin slice of the security budget, only a third believe their defenses are ahead of AI-enabled attackers, and a clear majority are already planning to replace what they have. At 107 respondents in a single wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market — but the direction is clear: agent adoption is running ahead of agent security, and the controls that matter most when something fails — scoped identity and isolation — are the ones enterprises have built least. The agent security gap is not a coverage problem that a provider guardrail will close on its own; it is a problem of identity, isolation, and enforcement built for autonomous software. The open question for later waves is whether enterprises close it deliberately — or whether a confirmed incident closes it for them.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 107 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single June 2026 wave. This is a directional read, not a precise measurement — the sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, so it's best read as the view from organizations actively standing up agent security rather than from the largest operators. Respondents are senior and buyer-credible (45% final decision-makers, 30% recommenders/influencers), spanning managers through the C-suite, and drawn primarily from Technology/Software, Manufacturing, Retail/E-commerce, and Healthcare/Life Sciences.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The AI compute gap: Enterprises are buying infrastructure faster than they can measure what it costs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Across 107 enterprises, AI infrastructure spending is accelerating well ahead of the ability to see or steer its economics. Most organizations run their AI on a familiar base of hyperscalers and model-provider APIs, yet the next dollar is aimed at specialized compute almost none of them use today...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689826/it-nachrichten/the-ai-compute-gap-enterprises-are-buying-infrastructure-faster-than-they-can-measure-what-it-costs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689826/it-nachrichten/the-ai-compute-gap-enterprises-are-buying-infrastructure-faster-than-they-can-measure-what-it-costs/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:19:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across 107 enterprises, AI infrastructure spending is accelerating well ahead of the ability to see or steer its economics. Most organizations run their AI on a familiar base of hyperscalers and model-provider APIs, yet the next dollar is aimed at specialized compute almost none of them use today; a majority intend to switch or add providers within the year, many within a quarter. Buying decisions turn on integration and total cost of ownership rather than headline token price — which is fortunate, because most enterprises cannot yet see their unit economics clearly: GPUs sit at half utilization or less, and fewer than half rigorously track what their compute actually costs. The result is a compute gap — heavy, fast-moving investment running ahead of the visibility needed to control it.</p><p>This wave of VentureBeat Pulse Research examines enterprise AI infrastructure and compute: where organizations are in their deployment journey, what they run AI on today, how satisfied they are, what would make them switch, where they plan to evaluate their investments, and — most revealingly — how well they can measure and control the economics of the compute underneath it all.</p><p>The central finding is a compute gap — the distance between how aggressively enterprises are investing in AI infrastructure and how little of its economics they can see. Only about one in five (21%) run AI in production at scale, yet spending intentions are outrunning that maturity: the single largest planned area enterprises plan to evaluate over the next year is AI-specialized clouds (45%), a layer almost none of these enterprises use today. Meanwhile the compute already in place runs cold — 83% report GPU utilization of 50% or less — and fewer than half (44%) can rigorously track what their AI compute costs. Enterprises are buying more infrastructure faster than they can account for what they already own.</p><p>Enterprises are not settled on their infrastructure vendors, either: A clear majority (64%) plan to switch or add an infrastructure provider within twelve months, and 38% within the next quarter — unusually high churn intent for a category this foundational. When they choose, they choose on integration with the existing stack (41%) and total cost of ownership (35%), not on headline price: cost per million tokens is the deciding factor for just 8%. And the frontier constraint that will shape the next round of decisions — the shift from GPU compute to memory bandwidth as inference scales — is barely on the radar, with roughly one in five enterprises either unaware of it or yet to address it.</p><h2>Methodology</h2><p>VentureBeat fielded this survey as part of its ongoing Pulse Research series, this survey focused on enterprise AI infrastructure, compute, and inference economics. Responses are filtered to organizations with more than 100 employees (n=107; the survey’s smallest size band, 1–100 employees, is excluded), drawn from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the report reads cross-sectionally and does not infer month-over-month trends. Several questions were multiple-select, so those shares can sum to more than 100%.</p><p>By organization size the sample concentrates in the mid-market: 101–250 employees (36%) and 251–1,000 (27%) lead, with 1,001–5,000 (22%), 5,001–10,000 (8%), and 10,001+ (7%) above them. By role it spans managers (38%), individual contributors (28%), VPs and directors (19%), and the C-suite (13%); on purchasing authority it is buyer-credible, with 45% final decision-makers and another 30% recommenders or influencers for AI solutions. Technology/Software is the largest industry at 26%, followed by Healthcare/Life Sciences (15%), Financial Services (13%), and Retail/E-commerce (12%).</p><p>At 107 respondents the sample is large enough to read directionally but should be treated as a directional signal rather than a precise measurement; it is self-selected and is not a probability sample. It also skews toward the mid-market and toward earlier-stage adopters, so it is best read as the view from organizations actively building out AI infrastructure rather than from the largest hyperscale operators.</p><h2>Finding 1: Ambition outpaces production</h2><p><b>Only one in five run AI in production at scale</b></p><p>We asked where organizations sit in their AI deployment journey. Most are still building toward production rather than operating at scale.</p><div></div><p>The maturity curve is front-loaded. Three-quarters of enterprises (76%) are either experimenting or running only some workloads in production, and just 21% describe AI in production at scale. This matters for everything that follows: the infrastructure decisions in this report are being made largely by organizations still early in deployment, whose compute footprint — and whose costs — are about to grow. The evaluation and switching intentions in Findings 3 and 4 are the leading edge of that build-out, not the settled preferences of operators who have already found what works.</p><h2>Finding 2: Enterprises run on hyperscalers and model APIs</h2><p><b>The specialized GPU clouds barely register — today</b></p><p>We asked which providers and platforms enterprises currently use to run their AI. The answer is a familiar one: the incumbents.</p><div></div><p>The current stack is hyperscaler-and-API. Google Cloud leads at 48%, and the general-purpose clouds (Google, Microsoft, AWS, Oracle) together with the major model APIs (Gemini, OpenAI, Anthropic) account for essentially all current deployment. The specialized “neocloud” GPU providers that dominate AI-infrastructure headlines — CoreWeave, Lambda, Crusoe, Nebius and peers — register at or near zero among these enterprises today. Only 6% run their own on-prem GPU clusters and 4% a custom open-source stack. Enterprises are, for now, running AI on the providers they already buy from — which makes the evaluation intentions in Finding 3 all the more striking.</p><p><i>(A note on reading these shares. As described in the methodology section, this sample is self-selected and skews mid-market, and this question counted every provider a respondent uses — an average of 2.1 selections each — so the figures measure presence in the stack rather than spending or primary status. A sample built this way will show a different provider mix than a spend-weighted census of the broader market; Google's strength here, for example, is consistent with its long-standing position among smaller enterprises building on AI. Read these shares as a portrait of what this AI-active cohort runs today, and treat gaps between these figures and industry-wide market share estimates as a property of the sample rather than a contradiction of either.)</i></p><h2>Finding 3: The next dollar goes to infrastructure they don’t yet run</h2><p><b>AI-specialized clouds top the evaluations list</b></p><p>We asked where enterprises planned to evaluate AI infrastructure over the next 12 months. Their answers point away from the stack they run today.</p><div></div><p>Here is the report’s sharpest tension. The single most-cited planned evaluation area — AI-specialized clouds, at 45% — is the very category almost none of these enterprises use today (Finding 2). Nearly a third (32%) intend to evaluate non-Nvidia accelerators, and 28% in next-generation Nvidia silicon; even decentralized compute networks (16%) and sovereign compute (11%) draw meaningful interest. Read against current usage, this is not incremental — it is the leading edge of a re-platforming. The direction-of-travel question tells the same story: every infrastructure approach is net-expanding, but specialized AI clouds carry the highest net momentum (+24), edging out even the hyperscalers (+22). Enterprises are preparing to move a meaningful share of AI compute off the general-purpose cloud.</p><p>This continues a trend we saw in our April-May survey wave. Back then, usage of the AI-specialized clouds was equally marginal — CoreWeave at 3%, Lambda at 4%, Crusoe at 2% of enterprises. When we asked enterprises what change they planned in their AI infrastructure strategy over the next twelve months, the most-cited answer was moving workloads to specialized AI clouds, at 33%. Asked in April-May which emerging compute option they were most likely to evaluate AI-specialized clouds again drew the most responses. Two waves, two differently worded questions, one consistent picture: the type of cloud enterprises are most eager to assess is the type they have barely begun to use.</p><h2>Finding 4: A switching wave is building</h2><p><b>Six in 10 plan to change providers within a year — many within a quarter</b></p><p>We asked whether and when enterprises plan to switch or add an infrastructure provider. Very few intend to stand still.</p><div></div><p>For a category as foundational as compute, this is a remarkable amount of intended movement. Only 36% have no plans to change, meaning a clear majority (64%) intend to switch or add a provider within twelve months — and 38% within the next quarter alone. Where that interest points is telling: the providers drawing the most switching consideration are again the incumbents — Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud (33% each), OpenAI (30%), and Gemini (22%) — which suggests much of the near-term movement is reshuffling among the majors and consolidating spend rather than defecting to new entrants. The neocloud interest in Finding 3 is a 12-month evaluation thesis; the switching in the next quarter is mostly incumbents trading share.</p><p>(<i>Method note: Respondents who selected both "no plans to change" and a specific switching window are counted as switchers, on the logic that naming a timeframe is the more specific answer; three respondents were reclassified under this rule.</i>)</p><h2>Finding 5: Nobody buys on token price</h2><p><b>Integration and total cost of ownership decide — not sticker price</b></p><p>We asked what matters most when enterprises select an AI infrastructure provider. Headline price finished last.</p><div></div><p>Enterprises do not buy AI infrastructure on pricing, which is the place vendors compete on hardest. Integration with the existing stack (41%) and total cost of ownership (35%) dominate, while the headline metric — cost per million tokens — is the deciding factor for just 8%, dead last. The pattern is coherent: buyers are optimizing for how a provider fits and what it truly costs to operate, not for the advertised unit rate. It also foreshadows Finding 7 — enterprises say TCO matters most, yet most cannot yet measure it rigorously. The stated priority and the measured capability are out of step.</p><h2>Finding 6: Expensive GPUs, idle most of the time</h2><p><b>83% report GPU utilization of 50% or less</b></p><p>We asked what share of their GPU capacity enterprises actually utilize. The answer is a well-known but rarely quantified inefficiency.</p><div></div><p><i>Disclosure: Band percentages count every selection against all 107 qualified respondents; 14 respondents selected more than one band, so bands overlap. At the respondent level, 83 of the 100 GPU-operating enterprises reported utilization at or below 50%</i></p><p>The compute already in place runs cold. Adding the bands at or below half capacity, 83% of enterprises that operate GPUs report utilization of 50% or less, and nearly half (49%) run at 25% or below. Only 12% clear the 50% mark, and a further 8% do not measure utilization at all. Idle accelerators are expensive accelerators, and this is the clearest single measure of the compute gap: enterprises are planning to buy more GPUs and specialized compute (Finding 3) while the capacity they already own sits substantially unused. The efficiency headroom in the current fleet is large — and largely unmeasured.</p><h2>Finding 7: Spending fast, measuring slowly</h2><p><b>Fewer than half rigorously track what their compute costs</b></p><p>We asked whether enterprises can quantify the cost and return of their AI infrastructure spend, and how satisfied they are with what they run. Confidence in the ledger lags the spending.</p><div></div><p>Measurement trails money. Fewer than half of enterprises (44%) rigorously track the cost and return of their AI compute; the majority track only partially (39%), cannot quantify it yet (20%), or have not prioritized it (6%). That gap is consequential given Finding 5, where total cost of ownership was the second-ranked buying criterion — enterprises are choosing providers on an economic basis they mostly cannot yet measure. Satisfaction with current infrastructure is moderately positive but not enthusiastic: on a five-point scale, overall satisfaction averages 4.0, with ease of implementation (3.8) and value for money (3.9) trailing slightly — the softness landing, tellingly, on cost. Enterprises are spending quickly and accounting slowly.</p><h2>Finding 8: The next bottleneck few are watching</h2><p><b>As inference shifts from compute to memory, the field scatters</b></p><p>Finally, we asked how enterprises would address the emerging constraint in large-scale inference — the shift from GPU compute to memory, specifically KV-cache capacity. The responses reveal a frontier that is not yet a priority.</p><div></div><p>The memory frontier is real but barely governed. Asked which approach they would rely on as the binding constraint in inference shifts from compute to memory bandwidth, enterprises scatter: Dell leads at 31%, Nvidia follows at 16%, and the rest fragments across storage vendors, open-source tooling, and model-level efficiency techniques. Most telling is that roughly one in five (18%) either do not recognize the constraint or have not begun to address it. For a shift that will reshape inference cost and architecture, this is an early and unsettled market — and, consistent with the measurement gap in Finding 7, one where many enterprises simply do not yet have a view. It is the next chapter of the compute gap, arriving before most have closed the current one.</p><h2>The bottom line: A compute gap that faster spending will widen, not close</h2><p>Organizations with more than 100 employees are investing in AI infrastructure faster than they can measure it. Most are still early in deployment, yet their spending intentions point past their current stack — toward specialized clouds and alternative accelerators almost none of them run today — and a clear majority intend to change providers within the year. They buy on integration and total cost of ownership rather than headline price, which is rational; the difficulty is that most cannot yet see those economics clearly.</p><p>The visibility gap is concrete. The GPUs enterprises already own run at half utilization or less for the overwhelming majority, and fewer than half can rigorously track what their compute costs or returns. Satisfaction is decent but unenthusiastic, softest on value for money — the dimension hardest to judge without measurement. And the next constraint, the shift from compute to memory in large-scale inference, is arriving while most enterprises are still unaware of it. At 107 respondents in a single Q2 wave this is a directional read, skewed toward the mid-market and earlier-stage adopters — but the direction is consistent: the appetite to spend is running well ahead of the instrumentation to spend well. The compute gap is not a capacity problem that more hardware will solve on its own; it is, first, a problem of seeing what the hardware already costs. The open question for later waves is whether enterprises build that visibility before the re-platforming arrives — or buy the next layer of infrastructure as blind to its economics as the last.</p><hr><p><i>Based on survey responses from 107 qualified enterprise respondents (100+ employees), drawn from a single Q2 2026 (June) wave. Because this is one wave rather than a pooled multi-month sample, the results read cross-sectionally rather than as a month-over-month trend, and at 107 respondents this is a directional signal rather than a precise measurement — the sample is self-selected, skews mid-market, and leans toward earlier-stage adopters rather than the largest hyperscale operators. Respondents include managers, individual contributors, VPs/directors, and the C-suite, with buyer-credible purchasing authority, across Technology/Software, Healthcare/Life Sciences, Financial Services, Retail/E-commerce, and other industries.</i></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Four Young Mathematicians Awarded the 2026 Fields Medals]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Scientific American reports that the 2026 Fields Medals went to four mathematicians for work ranging from the theory of knots to the motion of fluid: The Fields Medals went to Hong Wang of New York University and France's Institute of Advanced Scientific Studies (IHES), Yu Deng of the University ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689818/it-security-nachrichten/four-young-mathematicians-awarded-the-2026-fields-medals/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689818/it-security-nachrichten/four-young-mathematicians-awarded-the-2026-fields-medals/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:12:58 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Scientific American reports that the 2026 Fields Medals went to four mathematicians for work ranging from the theory of knots to the motion of fluid: The Fields Medals went to Hong Wang of New York University and France's Institute of Advanced Scientific Studies (IHES), Yu Deng of the University of Chicago, John Pardon of Stony Brook University and Jacob Tsimerman of the University of Toronto. In the awards' 90-year history, Wang is only the third woman to win one, after mathematicians Maryam Mirzakhani and Maryna Viazovska in 2014 and 2022, respectively. Wang and Deng represent the prizes' only Chinese-born recipients besides mathematician Shing-Tung Yau, who won a Fields Medal in 1982. 
Hong Wang co-proved the three-dimensional Kakeya conjecture, establishing a fundamental limit on how little space is needed to rotate a line through every possible direction. Mathematician Nets Katz called it the field's "holy grail" problem and said the achievement made her "a central figure" in the area.
 
Yu Deng and his collaborators reconciled the microscopic and macroscopic mathematics of fluid motion, proving that equations describing chaotic molecular interactions and large-scale fluid behavior are fundamentally connected. N.Y.U. mathematician Scott Armstrong called it "a truly spectacular, singular result."
 
John Pardon made an early breakthrough in knot theory by proving that certain sequences of knots can have arbitrarily large "distortion," a measure of how difficult they are to traverse. Princeton mathematician David Gabai said the problem had "attracted much interest among mathematicians during the previous 25 years."
 
Jacob Tsimerman and two collaborators proved the Andre-Oort conjecture, giving mathematicians a stronger way to understand special points on complex geometric objects known as Shimura varieties. Collaborator Jonathan Pila described him as "a brilliant mathematician" known for his "brilliance and resourcefulness." Tsimerman has also advanced Hodge theory and hopes pure mathematics can help researchers better understand AI.<p></p><div class="share_submission">
<a class="slashpop" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Four+Young+Mathematicians+Awarded+the+2026+Fields+Medals%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fscience.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F23%2F1616208%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a class="slashpop" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fscience.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F07%2F23%2F1616208%2Ffour-young-mathematicians-awarded-the-2026-fields-medals%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>



</div><p><a href="https://science.slashdot.org/story/26/07/23/1616208/four-young-mathematicians-awarded-the-2026-fields-medals?utm_source=rss1.0moreanon&amp;utm_medium=feed">Read more of this story</a> at Slashdot.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Apple's MacBook Pro with 48GB RAM drops to $2,699, saving you $400]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Apple's current 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 Pro chip and upgrade to 48GB of RAM is $400 off during B&H's month-end sale, but supply is limited at the reduced price.Save $400 on Apple's 14-inch MacBook Pro with an upgrade to 48GB RAM - Image credit: AppleB&H is slashing $400 off Apple's latest ...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689783/ios-mac-os/apples-macbook-pro-with-48gb-ram-drops-to-2699-saving-you-400/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689783/ios-mac-os/apples-macbook-pro-with-48gb-ram-drops-to-2699-saving-you-400/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:02:16 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apple's current 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 Pro chip and upgrade to 48GB of RAM is $400 off during B&amp;H's month-end sale, but supply is limited at the reduced price.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68342-144047-macbook-pro-48gb-ram-deal-xl.jpg" alt="Open MacBook Pro 14-inch laptop on dark background with colorful gradient glow, large bold white text across the screen reading 48GB RAM DEAL, suggesting a promotional offer for a highmemory computer" height="720"><br><span>Save $400 on Apple's 14-inch MacBook Pro with an upgrade to 48GB RAM - Image credit: Apple</span></div><br>B&amp;H is <strong><a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1957032-REG/apple_mbp_m5p_03_14_macbook_pro_m5.html/BI/1717/KBID/2301/SID/da-macp-14in-m5-pro-48gb-2699-072326" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">slashing $400 off</a></strong> Apple's latest 14-inch MacBook Pro with an upgrade to 48GB of RAM. Released in March 2026, the M5 Pro 14-inch MacBook Pro features higher unified memory bandwidth compared to the last-gen model and is equipped with Apple's N1 chip for Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6 support.<br><br><a href="https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1957032-REG/apple_mbp_m5p_03_14_macbook_pro_m5.html/BI/1717/KBID/2301/SID/da-macp-14in-m5-pro-48gb-2699-btn-072326" rel="nofollow" class="deal-highlight">Save $400 on 14" MacBook Pro 48GB RAM</a><br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/23/apples-macbook-pro-with-48gb-ram-drops-to-2699-saving-you-400?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245039?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[‘Customers prefer AI chatbots to humans’ says British Gas boss as 1,300 call centre staff axed]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Chris O’Shea defends Centrica’s plans as it reports rise in retail profits despite falling customer numbersThe owner of British Gas has claimed that most households would rather speak with an AI chatbot than deal with the company’s staff as it prepares to cut 1,300 jobs from its call centres.Cent...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689759/ai-nachrichten/customers-prefer-ai-chatbots-to-humans-says-british-gas-boss-as-1300-call-centre-staff-axed/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689759/ai-nachrichten/customers-prefer-ai-chatbots-to-humans-says-british-gas-boss-as-1300-call-centre-staff-axed/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:54:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris O’Shea defends Centrica’s plans as it reports rise in retail profits despite falling customer numbers</p><p>The owner of British Gas has claimed that most households would rather speak with an AI chatbot than deal with the company’s staff as it prepares to cut 1,300 jobs from its call centres.</p><p>Centrica, the supplier’s FTSE 100 owner, plans to cut 800 jobs as the company carries out a “targeted deployment of AI tools”, on top of the 500 cutsit confirmed last month.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jul/23/customers-prefer-ai-chatbots-says-chris-oshea-british-gas-centrica-boss">Continue reading...</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[BioLife Solutions to be acquired by Repligen in $1.5B cell therapy deal]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[BioLife Solutions, a Bothell, Wash.-based company developing tools for cell and gene therapy, is being acquired for $1.5 billion by the life sciences corporation Repligen.  Read More]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689757/it-nachrichten/biolife-solutions-to-be-acquired-by-repligen-in-15b-cell-therapy-deal/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689757/it-nachrichten/biolife-solutions-to-be-acquired-by-repligen-in-15b-cell-therapy-deal/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:53:44 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img fetchpriority="high" loading="eager" width="500" height="400" src="https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Profile-Rod-de-Greef.webp" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" decoding="async" srcset="https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Profile-Rod-de-Greef.webp 500w, https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Profile-Rod-de-Greef-300x240.webp 300w, https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Profile-Rod-de-Greef-200x160.webp 200w, https://cdn.geekwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Profile-Rod-de-Greef-125x100.webp 125w" sizes="(max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px"><br>BioLife Solutions, a Bothell, Wash.-based company developing tools for cell and gene therapy, is being acquired for $1.5 billion by the life sciences corporation Repligen.  <a href="https://www.geekwire.com/2026/biolife-solutions-to-be-acquired-by-repligen-in-1-5b-cell-therapy-deal/">Read More</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Nvidia Geforce Hotfix 610.82: Neuer Treiber behebt Problem mit Halo: Campaign Evolved]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Der Nvidia GeForce Hotfix-Treiber 610.82 behebt Fehler in zwei Spielen: Halo: Combat Evolved läuft auf RTX-50-Grafikkarten nun stabiler und Path of Exile 2 sollte bei langen Spielsessions unter DirectX 12 keine Aussetzer mehr zeigen. Ein Problem mit Battlefield 6 besteht jedoch weiterhin.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689751/it-nachrichten/nvidia-geforce-hotfix-61082-neuer-treiber-behebt-problem-mit-halo-campaign-evolved/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689751/it-nachrichten/nvidia-geforce-hotfix-61082-neuer-treiber-behebt-problem-mit-halo-campaign-evolved/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:53:36 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="https://pics.computerbase.de/1/2/3/9/4/3-1f959f56decd4892/article-640x360.5292c029.jpg"><p>Der Nvidia GeForce Hotfix-Treiber 610.82 behebt Fehler in zwei Spielen: Halo: Combat Evolved läuft auf RTX-50-Grafikkarten nun stabiler und Path of Exile 2 sollte bei langen Spielsessions unter DirectX 12 keine Aussetzer mehr zeigen. Ein Problem mit Battlefield 6 besteht jedoch weiterhin.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Ich habe ChatGPT um 100 Ideen gebeten: Darum sollten Sie das auch machen]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Wenn Sie einen KI-Chatbot darum bitten, Namen für einen Podcast, ein WLAN-Netzwerk oder ein kleines Unternehmen zu entwickeln, werden Sie wahrscheinlich eine Liste mit Vorschlägen erhalten, die ein wenig unkreativ ist.



Große Sprachmodelle wie ChatGPT, Claude und Gemini haben kein Problem damit...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689734/windows-tipps/ich-habe-chatgpt-um-100-ideen-gebeten-darum-sollten-sie-das-auch-machen/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689734/windows-tipps/ich-habe-chatgpt-um-100-ideen-gebeten-darum-sollten-sie-das-auch-machen/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:48:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Wenn Sie einen KI-Chatbot darum bitten, Namen für einen Podcast, ein WLAN-Netzwerk oder ein kleines Unternehmen zu entwickeln, werden Sie wahrscheinlich eine Liste mit Vorschlägen erhalten, die ein wenig unkreativ ist.</p>



<p>Große Sprachmodelle wie ChatGPT, Claude und Gemini haben kein Problem damit, ein Dutzend Namen für Ihr Lieblingsprojekt oder Ihre Website zu generieren. Aber ein Dutzend Namen zu erhalten, die wirklich vielfältig, einzigartig und einprägsam sind? Das ist deutlich schwieriger – aber dennoch möglich. Sie müssen nur wissen, wie Sie die Modelle auf die richtige Weise in verschiedene Richtungen lenken können.</p>



<p>Bitten Sie ChatGPT zunächst nicht nur um 10 oder 20 Ideen, sondern um 100. Eine <a href="https://mackinstitute.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/for-web-AI-idea-variance.pdf">Studie der Wharton School</a> [PDF] legt nahe, dass die Ideen, wenn Sie eine KI um so viele Ideen bitten, umso interessanter werden, je weiter Sie in der Liste nach unten gehen. Dies ist der „Dump“-Teil dieser zweistufigen Prompt-Technik.</p>



<p>In der zweiten Stufe bitten Sie ChatGPT, die Liste zu durchforsten, nach ähnlichen Einträgen zu suchen und diese durch neue zu ersetzen – alles mit dem Ziel, eine möglichst breite und vielfältige Ideensammlung zu schaffen.</p>



<p>Hier ist ein Beispiel für die erste Stufe der Eingabeaufforderung:</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>Gib mir 100 Ideen zu [Thema X]. Nummeriere diese von 1 bis 100. Gib für jede Idee nur einen kurzen Titel oder Namen an – keine Erklärungen, keine Beschreibungen. Beziehe alles mit ein, auch offensichtliche, schlechte, seltsame oder unausgereifte Antworten. Filtere nicht nach Qualität; das folgt später. Quantität ist das einzige Ziel.</p>
</blockquote>



<p>Sobald die KI ihre Liste geliefert hat, fahren Sie mit der zweiten Phase fort:</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>Überarbeite nun die Liste im Hinblick auf maximale Vielfalt. Wo immer zwei oder mehr Ideen auf demselben Grundkonzept beruhen, behalte die beste davon bei und ersetze die anderen durch Ideen aus Blickwinkeln, die sonst nirgendwo auf der Liste abgedeckt sind. Das Ziel sind 100 Ideen, bei denen keine zwei auf dasselbe zugrunde liegende Konzept verweisen – sie müssen sich in ihrer Art unterscheiden, nicht nur im Wortlaut.</p>
</blockquote>



<p>Optional können Sie mit einer Eingabe für die dritte Phase fortfahren, die die KI dazu veranlasst, die Liste nach Qualität zu filtern (ich empfehle jedoch, alle 100 Ideen der zweiten Phase selbst durchzugehen):</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>Was sind die 10 interessantesten Ideen auf der zweiten Liste?</p>
</blockquote>



<p>Ich habe diese „100-Ideen“-Anweisung (die ich aus einer in der oben genannten Wharton-Studie vorgestellten Anweisungskombination adaptiert habe) für einen lang gehegten Traum ausprobiert: die Eröffnung meines eigenen Cafés. Eine der größten Hürden ist natürlich die Wahl eines einfallsreichen Namens, also habe ich diese zweistufige Anweisung gestartet.</p>



<p>Ich möchte Sie nicht mit der gesamten Liste der Vorschläge langweilen, die ich erhalten habe. Aber hier sind die ersten 10 aus der ursprünglichen Auswahl:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>The Daily Grind</li>



<li>Bean There</li>



<li>Brewed Awakening</li>



<li>Central Perk</li>



<li>The Coffee House</li>



<li>Morning Cup</li>



<li>Java Junction</li>



<li>Common Grounds</li>



<li>Cup &amp; Bean</li>



<li>The Roasted Bean</li>
</ul>



<p>Dabei kamen die üblichen Verdächtigen heraus, bis hin zum „Central Perk“ aus der Serie <em>Friends</em>. Aber auch einige interessante Wortwitze.</p>



<p>Nach der Aufforderung der zweiten Stufe und der optionalen dritten Stufe („Nenne mir die 10 interessantesten Namen aus der zweiten Liste“) kam ich schließlich auf folgende Ergebnisse:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Warm Noise</li>



<li>Morning Object</li>



<li>Public Living Room</li>



<li>Moth &amp; Match</li>



<li>Localhost</li>



<li>Borrowed Sugar</li>



<li>Unfinished Sentence</li>



<li>Blue Hour</li>



<li>The Loading Bar</li>



<li>Sunday Weather</li>
</ul>



<p>Das sind wirklich ungewöhnliche, unkonventionelle Ideen für den Namen meines zukünftigen Cafés. Einige davon sind ein wenig techniklastig („Localhost“) oder einfach nur seltsam („Morning Object“), andere hingegen haben meine Aufmerksamkeit geweckt. „Blue Hour“ und „Borrowed Sugar“ gefallen mir tatsächlich sehr gut.</p>



<p>Probieren Sie diese zweistufige „100-Ideen“-Übung doch einmal aus, wenn Sie das nächste Mal Ideen benötigen. Selbst wenn dabei nicht gleich der perfekte Name für ein Café, einen Podcast oder einen Blog herauskommt, wird sie zumindest Ihre Kreativität anregen.</p>



<p><a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/2806063/so-macht-chatgpt-ihren-alltag-spuerbar-leichter-16-aufgaben-rasch-erledigen-lassen.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">ChatGPT im Alltag – 16 lästige Aufgaben, die KI für Sie erledigen kann</a></p>



<p><a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3183744/hoeren-sie-auf-chatgpt-ihre-texte-schreiben-zu-lassen-versuchen-sie-das-stattdessen.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Hören Sie auf, ChatGPT Ihre Texte schreiben zu lassen – Versuchen Sie das stattdessen</a></p>

</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Clean Up and Save $290 With This Dyson V8 Absolute Vac Deal]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Pay just $300 for this cordless stick vacuum.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689638/it-nachrichten/clean-up-and-save-290-with-this-dyson-v8-absolute-vac-deal/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689638/it-nachrichten/clean-up-and-save-290-with-this-dyson-v8-absolute-vac-deal/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:04:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Pay just $300 for this cordless stick vacuum.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Zwei RTX 5090 für die HMX 6 und Zeitreise zur Höllenmaschine 4 mit vier GPUs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Hallo, ich bin der Michi, willkommen zur vierten Ausgabe des HMX-6-Newsletters. Diese Woche erfahrt ihr, welche Grafikkarten wir in der HMX 6 verbauen. Außerdem verraten wir, warum Halo das Design der HMX 6 prägen wird. Außerdem reisen wir zurück ins Jahr 2012 zur Höllenmaschine 4, die mit vier G...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689498/it-nachrichten/zwei-rtx-5090-fuer-die-hmx-6-und-zeitreise-zur-hoellenmaschine-4-mit-vier-gpus/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689498/it-nachrichten/zwei-rtx-5090-fuer-die-hmx-6-und-zeitreise-zur-hoellenmaschine-4-mit-vier-gpus/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:32:54 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Hallo, ich bin der Michi, willkommen zur vierten Ausgabe des HMX-6-Newsletters. Diese Woche erfahrt ihr, welche Grafikkarten wir in der HMX 6 verbauen. Außerdem verraten wir, warum Halo das Design der HMX 6 prägen wird. Außerdem reisen wir zurück ins Jahr 2012 zur Höllenmaschine 4, die mit vier Grafikprozessoren neue Maßstäbe beim Gaming setzte. Wenn ihr keine Ausgabe verpassen wollt, könnt ihr den <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/newsletter-anmeldung" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Newsletter kostenlos abonnieren</a> – aber vergesst nicht, die Anmeldung via E-Mail zu bestätigen. Viel Spaß beim Lesen!</p>



<p>Hier geht es direkt <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/hmx" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">zum Gewinnspiel der HMX 6 im Gesamtwert von 40.000 Euro</a>. </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading toc">HMX 6: 2x RTX 5090 von ZOTAC GAMING und Halo-Design</h2>



<p>Jetzt können wir endlich verraten, welche Grafikkarten in der HMX 6 stecken: Als primäre Gaming-Grafikkarte der HMX 6 ist die RTX 5090 AMP Extreme INFINITY gedacht, während wir parallel dazu die RTX 5090 ARCTICSTORM AIO für <a href="https://store.steampowered.com/app/993090/Lossless_Scaling/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">verlustfreie Skalierung</a> verwenden, um Bildqualität und -wiederholrate in praktisch jedem Videospiel zu verbessern. Natürlich könnt ihr die gebündelte Kraft der zwei 5090 auch im kreativen Einsatz nutzen, etwa beim 3D-Rendering oder KI-Berechnungen. Hier findet ihr alle Informationen zu den <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3193773/hoellenmaschine-hmx-6-mit-zwei-rtx-5090-von-zotac-gaming.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">zwei ZOTAC-Grafikkarten</a>. </p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a6233f4c25ef"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-full wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ZOTAC-600.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all" alt="ZOTAC 600" class="wp-image-3196875" width="600" height="577" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure><p class="imageCredit">ZOTAC</p></div>



<p>Eigentlich wollten Kris und ich euch diese Woche schon den aktuellen Stand des Casecon im <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3194747/hoellenmaschine-hmx-6-im-halo-campaign-evolved-design.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Halo-Design</a> zeigen. Doch unserem Modder <a href="https://dcmm.de/media/uploads/2023/04/SIEGER_POKAL_012.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Stefan Ulrich</a> fehlen noch diverse Materialien. Jetzt fahren wir wahrscheinlich nächste Woche, doch die Zeit drängt schon wieder, denn wir wollen ja auf die Gamescom mit der HMX 6.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading toc">Rückblick: Die Höllenmaschine 4 setzte technische und optische Maßstäbe</h2>



<p>Neue Maßstäbe setzten wir 2012 auch bei der Vermarktung der Höllenmaschine 4 – zumindest für unsere Verhältnisse: vier aufwendig produzierte <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uY7XIARRvZw&amp;t=1s">Teaser-Videos</a> mit Engelchen und Teufelsdamen sowie Fritz als Padawan von Obi-Wan Michi. Das hat riesigen Spaß gemacht und uns als Team Hölle zusammengeschweißt – und war der Beginn einer wunderbaren Freundschaft. </p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a6233f4c2e99"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-full wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/HM4-600.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all" alt="HM4 600" class="wp-image-3196869" width="600" height="563" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure><p class="imageCredit">PC-WELT</p></div>



<p>Technisch auf der Höhe der Zeit waren wir mit den beiden Grafikkarten ASUS GTX690-4GD5, die jeweils zwei 915 MHz schnelle Nvidia Geforce GTX 690 beherbergten. Vier Grafikprozessoren gleichzeitig waren damals absoluter Wahnsinn und sorgten regelmäßig für offene Münder. Dazu gab es den Sechskerner Intel Core i7-3960X, 64 GB RAM im Vierkanalmodus, mit der OCZ RevoDrive die erste PCIe-SSD in einer Höllenmaschine und mit 10 Terabyte natürlich auch wieder verrückt viel HDD-Speicherplatz.</p>



<p>Sein höllisch gutes Aussehen verdankt das Gehäuse den international bekannten Casemoddern <a href="https://www.babetech.de/index.php/ueber-uns">Martin und Stefan Blass</a>. Sie haben ins Cooler Master Cosmos II ein Sichtfenster gefräst und per Airbrush lodernde Flammen auf die beiden Flügeltüren gezaubert. ARGB war damals noch kein Thema, aber mit dem Multidimmer von Richter waren immerhin individuelle Farbtöne und -wechsel per IR-Fernbedienung möglich. Hier geht es zum liebevoll restaurierten <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3188806/vor-14-jahren-pc-welt-verlost-hoellenmaschine-4-fuer-13333-euro.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Artikel zur Höllenmaschine 4 aus 2012</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading toc">Maus mit Noctua-Lüfter und Steam Machine im Praxis-Test </h2>



<p>Diese Woche ist eine skurrile Mail in meinem Postfach gelandet: Pulsar und Noctua präsentieren stolz die Früchte ihrer Zusammenarbeit: die <a href="https://www.noctua.at/en/news/pulsar-and-noctua-release-feinmann-f01-noctua-edition-gaming-mouse">Feinmann F01 Noctua Edition</a>, eine Gaming-Maus mit aktiver Belüftung der Handflächen. Ich bin gespannt, wer sich über kühlere Handflächen beim Zocken freut.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a6233f4c38f4"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-full wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Feinmann-F01-Noctua-Edition.jpg?quality=50&amp;strip=all" alt="Feinmann F01 Noctua Edition" class="wp-image-3196763" width="600" height="600" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure><p class="imageCredit">Noctua/Pulsar</p></div>



<p>Mein Kollege und Namensvetter Michael Crider hat sich die kostspielige (<a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3172820/steam-machine-valves-konsole-kostet-ab-1039-euro.html">ab 1.039 Euro</a>) Steam Machine gekauft und einem <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3194800/steam-machine-im-praxistest-ganz-nett-aber-leider-enttaeuschend.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">ausführlichen Praxistest</a> unterzogen. Sein Fazit fällt allerdings ernüchternd aus: Ein günstiger Mini-PC mit selbst installiertem SteamOS bietet derzeit nahezu denselben Nutzen für deutlich weniger Geld.</p>



<p>Warum es ein Problem ist, dass <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3193615/in-neuen-laptops-kommen-alte-cpus-zum-einsatz-das-ist-ein-problem.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">in neuen Laptops alte CPUs zum Einsatz kommen</a>, erklärt mein Kollege Mark Hachman.  </p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading toc">Vielen Dank fürs Lesen!</h2>



<p>ommende Woche besuchen Kris und ich endlich unseren Modder Stefan, der uns dann hoffentlich schon das fast fertige Tisch-PC-Gehäuse für die Build-Week präsentiert – immer optimistisch bleiben, denn langsam drängt die Zeit. Außerdem reisen wir zurück ins Jahr 2013 zur legendären Höllenmaschine 5 mit den vielen Totenköpfen. Wenn ihr nichts verpassen wollt, abonniert den <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/newsletter-anmeldung" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">kostenlosen HMX-6-Newsletter</a> – und denkt daran, eure Anmeldung per E-Mail zu bestätigen. Ich freue mich schon auf nächste Woche – bis dann! Euer Michi.</p>

</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Bringt Ordnung ins Kabelchaos: Amazon verkauft heute eine praktische Reisetasche günstiger]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Schluss mit dem Durcheinander: Dieses durchdachte Reise-Gadget löst ein Problem, das wir alle kennen.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689469/it-nachrichten/bringt-ordnung-ins-kabelchaos-amazon-verkauft-heute-eine-praktische-reisetasche-guenstiger/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689469/it-nachrichten/bringt-ordnung-ins-kabelchaos-amazon-verkauft-heute-eine-praktische-reisetasche-guenstiger/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:18:39 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Schluss mit dem Durcheinander: Dieses durchdachte Reise-Gadget löst ein Problem, das wir alle kennen.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[The Meter Was Always Running]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[The first expensive agent run doesn’t look like a governance problem. It looks like a billing problem. A team opens its first agent invoice after the meter turns on, sorts the runs by cost, and finds one that cost 40 times the median. The provider meter shows tokens and a total. The application l...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689450/ai-nachrichten/the-meter-was-always-running/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689450/ai-nachrichten/the-meter-was-always-running/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:06:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The first expensive agent run doesn’t look like a governance problem. It looks like a billing problem. A team opens its first agent invoice after the meter turns on, sorts the runs by cost, and finds one that cost 40 times the median. The provider meter shows tokens and a total. The application logs say […]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Alte Bücher werden für Millionen aufgekauft und danach zerstört]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Das Internet ist voller KI-Texte und genau das wird für die KI selbst zum Problem. Denn wer Sprachmodelle mit KI-Slop trainiert, bekommt Müll zurück. Die Lösung der großen Tech-Konzerne: massenhaft gedruckte Bücher kaufen, einscannen und schreddern.Ein Kommentar von Ewelina Walkenbach]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689387/it-nachrichten/alte-buecher-werden-fuer-millionen-aufgekauft-und-danach-zerstoert/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689387/it-nachrichten/alte-buecher-werden-fuer-millionen-aufgekauft-und-danach-zerstoert/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:50:12 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Das Internet ist voller KI-Texte und genau das wird für die KI selbst zum Problem. Denn wer Sprachmodelle mit KI-Slop trainiert, bekommt Müll zurück. Die Lösung der großen Tech-Konzerne: massenhaft gedruckte Bücher kaufen, einscannen und schreddern.Ein Kommentar von Ewelina Walkenbach]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[An AirPod-powered Frisbee tracker makes backyard throws scientific]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[A developer and Frisbee fan turned AirPods into a flying-disc stat tracker, using motion sensors to measure throws in a clever demonstration of what Apple's earbuds can do beyond playing audio.AirPods 4Sharhan demonstrated Kinapod Disc on Reddit on July 20. The setup requires users to make a smal...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689282/ios-mac-os/an-airpod-powered-frisbee-tracker-makes-backyard-throws-scientific/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689282/ios-mac-os/an-airpod-powered-frisbee-tracker-makes-backyard-throws-scientific/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:08:59 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🍏 iOS / Mac OS</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A developer and Frisbee fan turned <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/airpods" title="AirPods" data-kpt="1">AirPods</a> into a flying-disc stat tracker, using motion sensors to measure throws in a clever demonstration of what Apple's earbuds can do beyond playing audio.<br><br><div><img src="https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/68335-144037-AirPods-4-case-xl.jpg" alt="White wireless earbuds resting in an open charging case on a soft gray fabric surface, with the case lid tilted back and earbuds partially seated in their slots" height="738"><span>AirPods 4</span></div><br>Sharhan <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/airpods/comments/1v22xgq/airpods_can_track_frisbee_throws/">demonstrated Kinapod Disc</a> on Reddit on July 20. The setup requires users to make a small hole in the center of a flying disc and insert one AirPod stem-first.<br><br>Once it's mounted, the AirPod sends motion data to an <a href="https://appleinsider.com/inside/iphone" title="iPhone" data-kpt="1">iPhone</a> while Kinapod Disc detects each throw and records spin rate, total revolutions, estimated release speed, and airborne time.<br><br>It's a fun albeit expensive solution to the problem of throwing a plastic disc without enough statistics. It's also a clever use of motion sensors Apple builds into AirPods.<br><br><br> <a href="https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/07/23/an-airpod-powered-frisbee-tracker-makes-backyard-throws-scientific?utm_source=rss">Continue Reading on AppleInsider</a> | <a href="https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/245036?urm_source=rss">Discuss on our Forums</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Mozilla Addons Blog: Firefox 153 WebExtensions API updates]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[We had a bumper release of WebExtensions API updates in Firefox 153. To start, there is a permissions change that affects how your extensions access local files. We then have two contributions from the community members: userScripts.execute() and the new publicSuffix API. We’re covering those con...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689274/tools/mozilla-addons-blog-firefox-153-webextensions-api-updates/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689274/tools/mozilla-addons-blog-firefox-153-webextensions-api-updates/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:06:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>💾  Tools</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had a bumper release of <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Firefox/Releases/153#changes_for_add-on_developers">WebExtensions API updates in Firefox 153</a>. To start, there is a permissions change that affects how your extensions access local files. We then have two contributions from the community members: <span>userScripts.execute()</span> and the new <span>publicSuffix</span> API. We’re covering those contributions in more depth, including the people behind them, in a separate post. And there is more, read on…</p>
<h3><b>File access now requires a dedicated permission</b></h3>
<p>Extensions that need to read <span>file://</span> URLs used to get that access as part of the “Access your data for all websites” host permission. Starting in Firefox 153, file access is a separate, explicit permission, “Access local files on your computer”, shown in the extension’s permissions settings. It’s off by default for every extension, including ones already installed.</p>
<p>This change has a few concrete effects on code:</p>
<ul>
<li><b>Before:</b> an extension with <span>&lt;all_urls&gt;</span> or a matching host permission could read <span>file://</span> pages without any additional grant, and <span>extension.isAllowedFileSchemeAccess()</span> always returned <span>false</span> regardless of the permission setting.</li>
<li><b>After:</b> the extension must have the new file-access permission granted, and <span>extension.isAllowedFileSchemeAccess()</span> correctly reflects whether the user has granted it.</li>
</ul>
<pre>async function checkFileSchemeAccess() {
  const isAllowed = await browser.extension.isAllowedFileSchemeAccess();

  if (!isAllowed) {
    await browser.notifications.create("file-scheme-access-needed", {
      type: "basic",
      iconUrl: browser.runtime.getURL("icons/icon-48.png"),
      title: "Local file access required",
      message:
        'This extension needs "Allow access to file URLs" enabled to work ' +
        "with local files. Go to about:addons → select this extension → " +
        "turn on that setting, then reload the page.",
    });
    return false;
  }

  return true;
}</pre>
<p><span>devtools.inspectedWindow.eval()</span> calls targeting <span>file://</span> URLs are affected the same way; they now require this permission to succeed.</p>
<p>If your extension depends on <span>file://</span> access, expect existing users to see that access stops after upgrading (until they enable the permission), and consider adding a prompt or fallback path, for example by specifying an embedded options page (<span>options_ui</span>) and calling <span>browser.runtime.openOptionsPage()</span> to open <span>about:addons</span> and including instructions to toggle the setting in the “Permissions and data” tab.</p>
<h3><b>userScripts.execute() and publicSuffix: covered in our next post</b></h3>
<p>Firefox 153 adds two community-contributed APIs:</p>
<ul>
<li><span>userScripts.execute()</span>, which provides for one-off injection of one or more user script sources into a tab or frame, in a defined order, as a complement to the persistent, URL-pattern-based <span>userScripts.register()</span>.</li>
<li><span>publicSuffix</span>, which enables synchronous lookups against the browser’s built-in <a href="https://publicsuffix.org/">Public Suffix List</a> using <span>publicSuffix.isKnownSuffix()</span>, <span>publicSuffix.getKnownSuffix()</span>, and <span>publicSuffix.getDomain()</span>. This API means that extensions no longer need to bundle or maintain a suffix list to determine a hostname’s registrable domain (eTLD+1).</li>
</ul>
<p>Both APIs were built by contributors motivated by real needs in their extensions. We take an in-depth look at these contributions, their developers, impact, and history in a forthcoming post.</p>
<h3><b>documentId support across more APIs</b></h3>
<p>Firefox 153 introduces <span>documentId</span>, a stable identifier for a document instance, including a new <span>runtime.getDocumentId()</span> method, several <span>webNavigation</span> events and methods, <span>webRequest</span> events, scripting injection targets, and the extension messaging APIs.</p>
<p>Many WebExtension APIs use <span>tabId</span> and <span>frameId</span> to identify where to perform an operation. However, because <span>frameId</span> identifies the frame rather than its content, the loaded document can change and the extension’s subsequent operation ends up targeting the new (intended) document. <span>documentId</span> addresses this problem by providing a unique ID for the document. Now, if an extension uses the ID and the frame’s document has changed, the operation fails rather than silently targeting the wrong document.</p>
<p>See <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/WebExtensions/Work_with_documentId">Work with documentId</a> for the full list of supported events and methods, along with guidance on using it.</p>
<h3><b>Content scripts can read and modify adopted stylesheets</b></h3>
<p>Content scripts can now access <span>document.adoptedStyleSheets</span> and <span>ShadowRoot.adoptedStyleSheets</span> directly.</p>
<pre>const sheet = new CSSStyleSheet();
sheet.replaceSync("* { background: pink; }");
document.adoptedStyleSheets = [sheet];</pre>
<p>This enables extensions to inspect or modify constructed stylesheets from a content script, without using <span>.wrappedJSObject</span>, a workaround that risks interference from the web page.</p>
<h3><b>Theme manifest key: gradients in additional backgrounds</b></h3>
<p>The <span>theme</span> manifest key’s <span>images.additional_backgrounds</span> property now accepts CSS gradients alongside image URLs. A new <span>properties.additional_backgrounds_size</span> property controls the size of each additional background item.</p>
<h3><b>Contextual identities (containers)</b></h3>
<p>If your extension supports contextual identities, you now have access to two new methods: <span>contextualIdentities.getSupportedColors()</span> and <span>contextualIdentities.getSupportedIcons()</span>. These methods return the supported colors and icons, so your extension doesn’t need to hardcode either list.</p>
<p>Also, the colors have been updated to align with the new UI theme: <span>“turquoise”</span> is now <span>“cyan”</span>, <span>“toolbar”</span> is now <span>“gray”</span>, and <span>“violet”</span> has been added. The old names still work for backward compatibility, but your extension should switch to using <span>getSupportedColors()</span> rather than hardcoding either the old or new names.</p>
<h3><b>Add a build-for-amo script</b></h3>
<p>While this isn’t about new APIs, I wanted to mention a change that’s part of our work to make source code review faster and more reliable. When you submit an extension version, AMO now attempts to build your extensions from the submitted source code and compares the result to the package you uploaded. When the two match, reviewers don’t have to verify the build manually. This means submission can move through its review faster.</p>
<p>For now, this applies only if you submit source code that includes a <span>package.json</span> file to build your extension. If your extension has no build step, or you use a different build system, nothing changes. The AMO builder keeps its zero-config approach.</p>
<p>So, if your extension’s source code uses a <span>package.json</span> file, add an <a href="https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v11/using-npm/scripts">npm script</a> named <span>build-for-amo</span> that runs the commands needed to build your extension for Firefox:</p>
<pre>{
  "scripts": {
    "fx-build": "some commands to build your add-on for Firefox",
    "build-for-amo": "npm run fx-build"
  }
}</pre>
<p>If you’ve a Firefox-specific build command, just point <span>build-for-amo</span> at it. When present, the builder invokes this script instead of guessing how to build your extension. And while you are at it, make sure all your dev dependencies are listed in the <span>package.json</span> file.</p>
<hr>
<p>For more information, including documentation and Bugzilla links, see the <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Firefox/Releases/153#changes_for_add-on_developers">Changes for add-on developers</a> section of the Firefox 153 for developers release notes on MDN.</p>
<p>As always, file extension-related issues on <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/">Bugzilla</a> under the WebExtensions product, cross-browser API proposals are discussed in the <a href="https://github.com/w3c/webextensions">W3C WebExtensions Community Group</a>, and questions are welcome on the <a href="https://discourse.mozilla.org/c/add-ons/35">Add-ons Discourse</a>.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2026/07/23/firefox-153-webextensions-api-updates/">Firefox 153 WebExtensions API updates</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blog.mozilla.org/addons">Mozilla Add-ons Community Blog</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[GPT-Modelle starten einen Cyber-Angriff, Google ersetzt NotebookLM & Kimi K3 ist da | KI-News]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Author: Digitale Profis - Bewertung: 12x - Views:105 Artikel & Newsletter: https://digitaleprofis.de/die-ki-news-der-woche-vom-23-07-2026/

Quellen
OpenAI-Modelle hacken Hugging Face 
Artikel: https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-model-evaluation-security-incident/ 
Hintergrund: https://huggingf...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689268/ai-nachrichten/gpt-modelle-starten-einen-cyber-angriff-google-ersetzt-notebooklm-kimi-k3-ist-da-ki-news/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689268/ai-nachrichten/gpt-modelle-starten-einen-cyber-angriff-google-ersetzt-notebooklm-kimi-k3-ist-da-ki-news/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:04:50 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author: Digitale Profis - Bewertung: 12x - Views:105 <br/></p><p><iframe id="ytplayer" loading="lazy" type="text/html" width="100%" height="auto" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/tgldX3mtgfg?autoplay=1&origin=http://tsecurity.de" frameborder="0"></iframe></p><p>Artikel & Newsletter: https://digitaleprofis.de/die-ki-news-der-woche-vom-23-07-2026/<br />
<br />
Quellen<br />
OpenAI-Modelle hacken Hugging Face <br />
Artikel: https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-model-evaluation-security-incident/ <br />
Hintergrund: https://huggingface.co/blog/security-incident-july-2026 <br />
<br />
Digitaleprofis.de hat ein Update bekommen <br />
Website: https://digitaleprofis.de/ <br />
<br />
Kimi K3 ist da <br />
Artikel: https://www.kimi.com/de/blog/kimi-k3 <br />
Artikel: https://apnews.com/article/kimi-k3-china-ai-0d8a5e268deb11a673f4d444fc597cc5 <br />
Ausprobieren: https://www.kimi.com/ <br />
<br />
Neue Gemini Modelle <br />
Artikel: https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/gemini-3-6-flash-3-5-flash-lite-3-5-flash-cyber/ <br />
Modellkarte: https://deepmind.google/models/model-cards/gemini-3-6-flash/ <br />
Cyber-Modell: https://deepmind.google/blog/introducing-gemini-3-5-flash-cyber/ <br />
<br />
Neue Kennzeichnungspflichten des EU AI Acts <br />
Artikel: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/commission-publishes-guidelines-transparency-obligations-providers-and-deployers-certain-ai-systems <br />
Doku: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/faqs/transparency-obligations-under-article-50-ai-act <br />
<br />
Anthropic zahlt 1,5 Milliarden Dollar <br />
Artikel: https://m.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/us-judge-approves-anthropics-15-billion-settlement-of-copyright-lawsuit-4801706?ampMode=1 <br />
Artikel: https://apnews.com/article/74b140444023898aeba8579b6e9f0d63 <br />
<br />
NotebookLM wird zu Gemini Notebook <br />
Artikel: https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/products/gemini-notebook/notebooklm-gemini-notebook/ <br />
<br />
Microsoft und Mistral Partnerschaft <br />
Artikel: https://news.microsoft.com/source/2026/07/21/microsoft-and-mistral-expand-strategic-partnership-to-give-enterprises-and-regulated-industries-frontier-ai-they-can-control/ <br />
Artikel: https://www.tagesschau.de/wirtschaft/unternehmen/microsoft-mistral-ai-ki-deal-100.html <br />
<br />
Qwen-Audio-3.0-TTS <br />
Artikel: https://www.alibabacloud.com/blog/qwen-audio-3-0-tts-more-multilingual-easier-to-direct_603379 <br />
Doku: https://docs.qwencloud.com/developer-guides/speech/tts-models <br />
<br />
OpenAI-Modelle überwinden bei einem internen Sicherheitstest ihre isolierte Testumgebung und gelangen bis in die Produktionsinfrastruktur von Hugging Face.<br />
Wir ordnen den Vorfall ein und fassen die weiteren wichtigen KI-News der Woche kompakt für euch zusammen.<br />
<br />
Außerdem geht es um Kimi K3, drei neue Gemini-Modelle, die kommenden Kennzeichnungspflichten des EU AI Acts und den milliardenschweren Urheberrechtsvergleich zwischen Anthropic und Autoren.<br />
<br />
Im Video:<br />
- OpenAIs ungewöhnlicher Sicherheitsvorfall bei Hugging Face<br />
- Kimi K3 und drei neue Gemini-Modelle<br />
- Kennzeichnungspflichten des EU AI Acts ab August 2026<br />
- Anthropics Vergleich über mindestens 1,5 Milliarden US-Dollar<br />
- Gemini Notebook, Microsofts Mistral-Partnerschaft und Qwen-Audio-3.0-TTS<br />
<br />
Unsere Website wurde ebenfalls vollständig überarbeitet. Auf digitaleprofis.de findet ihr unsere KI-News mit allen Quellen, ausführliche Artikel und praktische Anleitungen – kostenlos, ohne Paywall und ohne Werbung.<br />
<br />
Werde Kanalmitglied und unterstütze damit unsere Arbeit:<br />
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCv90NdTyTp7ZPPRvvSZaS5w/join<br />
<br />
Videoinhalt:<br />
00:00 Die KI-News der Woche vom 23.07.2026<br />
00:24 OpenAI Modelle greifen HuggingFace an<br />
02:06 Unsere neue Website für euch<br />
02:59 Kimi K3 ist da und die USA werfen Diebstahl vor<br />
04:28 Drei neue Gemini Modelle, aber kein Pro<br />
05:53 Die neuen Kennzeichnungspflichten des AI Acts<br />
07:21 Anthropic muss 1,5 Milliarden Dollar Vergleich zahlen<br />
08:48 NotebookLM verschwindet - und wird zu Gemini Notebook<br />
09:30 Partnerschaft von Microsoft und Mistral<br />
10:50 Neuen Text to Speech Modell von Alibabas Qwen<br />
<br />
Videovorschläge, Feedback und Kritik kannst Du uns jederzeit in den Kommentaren mitteilen!<br/></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Gen Z vertraut bei Finanzfragen auf KI-Chatbots: Warum das ein Problem ist]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Junge Menschen im Alter zwischen 16 und 29 Jahren, also die sogenannte Gen Z, greifen in Finanzfragen zunehmend auf die Expertise von KI-Chatbots zurück. In vielen Fällen geht es dabei auch um konkrete Anlageempfehlungen. Das birgt Risiken.weiterlesen auf t3n.de]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689249/it-nachrichten/gen-z-vertraut-bei-finanzfragen-auf-ki-chatbots-warum-das-ein-problem-ist/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689249/it-nachrichten/gen-z-vertraut-bei-finanzfragen-auf-ki-chatbots-warum-das-ein-problem-ist/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:03:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Junge Menschen im Alter zwischen 16 und 29 Jahren, also die sogenannte Gen Z, greifen in Finanzfragen zunehmend auf die Expertise von KI-Chatbots zurück. In vielen Fällen geht es dabei auch um konkrete Anlageempfehlungen. Das birgt Risiken.<a href="https://t3n.de/news/gen-z-finanzfragen-ki-chatbots-1754266/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=newsFeed&amp;utm_campaign=newsFeed">weiterlesen auf t3n.de</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI Presence raises new questions about enterprise automation and jobs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[OpenAI has launched Presence, an enterprise service for deploying voice and chat agents that can resolve customer and employee requests, potentially automating some work now handled by frontline support teams.



The agents can answer questions and operate IT systems, and enterprises can decide w...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689165/it-nachrichten/openai-presence-raises-new-questions-about-enterprise-automation-and-jobs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689165/it-nachrichten/openai-presence-raises-new-questions-about-enterprise-automation-and-jobs/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:20:41 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI has launched Presence, an enterprise service for deploying voice and chat agents that can resolve customer and employee requests, potentially automating some work now handled by frontline support teams.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The agents can answer questions and operate IT systems, and enterprises can decide what actions the agents may take and when they should seek human approval for actions or transfer a case to a human.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI is already using Presence internally for its English-language phone support channel, where it verifies callers and uses account information to complete approved actions. The company said the system resolves 75% of inbound issues without human assistance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another OpenAI service, Codex, can be used to monitor agents and suggest updates or improvements to processes. In OpenAI’s own tests, suggestions from Codex helped reduce handoffs to humans by 15 percentage points over 10 days, it said. Presence also includes simulation and evaluation tools that allow companies to test an agent before deployment. The tests assess whether it reaches the correct outcome, follows company policy, and hands a case to an employee when required.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI intends each Presence deployment to deal with one kind of task, for example billing issues, insurance claims, or employee IT service requests, with agents getting only the knowledge and system access required for that task.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Presence is not a self-service product: Enterprises will have to sign up for the limited availability program, with integration performed by OpenAI or selected <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4136024/openai-partners-with-consulting-giants-to-deploy-enterprise-ai-agents.html">global systems integrators</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Companies exploring or testing Presence include Spanish bank BBVA, which is evaluating the service for everyday banking support in Mexico, and Japanese technology group SoftBank, which is using it in trials involving Japanese-language customer interactions. Australian insurer IAG is assessing whether the technology can help it respond to surges in customer demand during severe weather events.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Workforce impact</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI’s announcement did not address the potential effect of Presence on employment. But its claimed automation rate raises questions about how the technology could affect staffing in customer service and other support functions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://pareekh.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Pareekh Jain</a>, CEO of Pareekh Consulting, said CIOs should regard the 75% figure as evidence that the technology can work, rather than as a benchmark that every enterprise can expect to reach.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jain said OpenAI’s deployment benefits from being built around the company’s own products and data. Large enterprises may achieve lower automation rates because they must contend with fragmented legacy systems, uneven knowledge bases and more complex compliance demands.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Most organizations should expect lower initial automation levels that improve over time as the AI agent is refined,” Jain said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first workforce effect is more likely to be <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4015750/cios-see-ai-prompting-new-it-hiring-even-as-boards-push-for-job-cuts.html">slower hiring than immediate layoffs</a>, according to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/tulikasheel/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tulika Sheel</a>, senior vice president at Kadence International.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The roles most exposed are likely to be repetitive, high-volume functions such as frontline customer support and routine back-office processing,” Sheel said. “However, I would expect the first impact to be on hiring and team growth rather than immediate large-scale job cuts. Over time, enterprises may redesign roles around AI-assisted workflows, with humans focusing more on complex cases, escalation, and relationship management.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jain said Tier-1 support agents handling predictable queries would face the most exposure. Broader reductions would become more likely only after companies reorganize their operations around the technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, <a href="https://omdia.tech.informa.com/authors/lian-jye-su" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lian Jye Su</a>, chief analyst at Omdia, said Presence is unlikely to increase the threat of job displacement because companies have used similar customer-support automation from vendors such as Genesys, NiCE, Five9 and AWS for years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises are more likely to use Presence alongside employees, with AI handling routine requests while people remain responsible for work requiring judgment and empathy, Su said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Cost and operational risks</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Analysts said CIOs should examine whether Presence can maintain resolution quality as usage grows, since fewer human handoffs could leave employees dealing with a more difficult mix of cases.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The key question is not simply how many tasks AI can handle, but whether it can handle them reliably at scale,” Sheel said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The financial case will depend partly on the cost of connecting Presence to existing systems and maintaining the controls needed to govern its use, according to Jain. “Often the biggest cost of enterprise AI is not tokens but <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4128310/openai-responds-to-claude-cowork-with-its-own-platform-to-help-build-deploy-and-manage-ai-agents.html">integration and governance</a>,” Jain added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Companies will need to determine what systems and data the agents can access, monitor their performance, and audit the actions they take. Those investments could offset early savings.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Su said the complexity of enterprise IT will make it difficult for OpenAI to automate entire workflows on its own. Enterprises will still need to work with other technology providers and human employees, while CIOs will favor systems that can be audited and integrated with existing infrastructure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jain said the economics could improve if companies use the same integrations and governance controls across additional workflows.</p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[OpenAI Presence raises new questions about enterprise automation and jobs]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[OpenAI has launched Presence, an enterprise service for deploying voice and chat agents that can resolve customer and employee requests, potentially automating some work now handled by frontline support teams.



The agents can answer questions and operate IT systems, and enterprises can decide w...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689164/it-nachrichten/openai-presence-raises-new-questions-about-enterprise-automation-and-jobs/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689164/it-nachrichten/openai-presence-raises-new-questions-about-enterprise-automation-and-jobs/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:20:32 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI has launched Presence, an enterprise service for deploying voice and chat agents that can resolve customer and employee requests, potentially automating some work now handled by frontline support teams.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The agents can answer questions and operate IT systems, and enterprises can decide what actions the agents may take and when they should seek human approval for actions or transfer a case to a human.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI is already using Presence internally for its English-language phone support channel, where it verifies callers and uses account information to complete approved actions. The company said the system resolves 75% of inbound issues without human assistance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another OpenAI service, Codex, can be used to monitor agents and suggest updates or improvements to processes. In OpenAI’s own tests, suggestions from Codex helped reduce handoffs to humans by 15 percentage points over 10 days, it said. Presence also includes simulation and evaluation tools that allow companies to test an agent before deployment. The tests assess whether it reaches the correct outcome, follows company policy, and hands a case to an employee when required.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI intends each Presence deployment to deal with one kind of task, for example billing issues, insurance claims, or employee IT service requests, with agents getting only the knowledge and system access required for that task.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Presence is not a self-service product: Enterprises will have to sign up for the limited availability program, with integration performed by OpenAI or selected <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4136024/openai-partners-with-consulting-giants-to-deploy-enterprise-ai-agents.html">global systems integrators</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Companies exploring or testing Presence include Spanish bank BBVA, which is evaluating the service for everyday banking support in Mexico, and Japanese technology group SoftBank, which is using it in trials involving Japanese-language customer interactions. Australian insurer IAG is assessing whether the technology can help it respond to surges in customer demand during severe weather events.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Workforce impact</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">OpenAI’s announcement did not address the potential effect of Presence on employment. But its claimed automation rate raises questions about how the technology could affect staffing in customer service and other support functions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://pareekh.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Pareekh Jain</a>, CEO of Pareekh Consulting, said CIOs should regard the 75% figure as evidence that the technology can work, rather than as a benchmark that every enterprise can expect to reach.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jain said OpenAI’s deployment benefits from being built around the company’s own products and data. Large enterprises may achieve lower automation rates because they must contend with fragmented legacy systems, uneven knowledge bases and more complex compliance demands.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Most organizations should expect lower initial automation levels that improve over time as the AI agent is refined,” Jain said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The first workforce effect is more likely to be <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4015750/cios-see-ai-prompting-new-it-hiring-even-as-boards-push-for-job-cuts.html">slower hiring than immediate layoffs</a>, according to <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/tulikasheel/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tulika Sheel</a>, senior vice president at Kadence International.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The roles most exposed are likely to be repetitive, high-volume functions such as frontline customer support and routine back-office processing,” Sheel said. “However, I would expect the first impact to be on hiring and team growth rather than immediate large-scale job cuts. Over time, enterprises may redesign roles around AI-assisted workflows, with humans focusing more on complex cases, escalation, and relationship management.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jain said Tier-1 support agents handling predictable queries would face the most exposure. Broader reductions would become more likely only after companies reorganize their operations around the technology.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">However, <a href="https://omdia.tech.informa.com/authors/lian-jye-su" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lian Jye Su</a>, chief analyst at Omdia, said Presence is unlikely to increase the threat of job displacement because companies have used similar customer-support automation from vendors such as Genesys, NiCE, Five9 and AWS for years.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Enterprises are more likely to use Presence alongside employees, with AI handling routine requests while people remain responsible for work requiring judgment and empathy, Su said.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Cost and operational risks</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Analysts said CIOs should examine whether Presence can maintain resolution quality as usage grows, since fewer human handoffs could leave employees dealing with a more difficult mix of cases.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The key question is not simply how many tasks AI can handle, but whether it can handle them reliably at scale,” Sheel said.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The financial case will depend partly on the cost of connecting Presence to existing systems and maintaining the controls needed to govern its use, according to Jain. “Often the biggest cost of enterprise AI is not tokens but <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/article/4128310/openai-responds-to-claude-cowork-with-its-own-platform-to-help-build-deploy-and-manage-ai-agents.html">integration and governance</a>,” Jain added.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Companies will need to determine what systems and data the agents can access, monitor their performance, and audit the actions they take. Those investments could offset early savings.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Su said the complexity of enterprise IT will make it difficult for OpenAI to automate entire workflows on its own. Enterprises will still need to work with other technology providers and human employees, while CIOs will favor systems that can be audited and integrated with existing infrastructure.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Jain said the economics could improve if companies use the same integrations and governance controls across additional workflows.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.cio.com/article/4200684/openai-presence-raises-new-questions-about-enterprise-automation-and-jobs.html">CIO</a>.</em></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Neue Samsung-Smartphones verfügen über eine geheime Superkraft]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Samsung könnte das größte Problem von Falt-Smartphones mit einer neuen Titan-Technologie gelöst haben.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689162/android-tipps/neue-samsung-smartphones-verfuegen-ueber-eine-geheime-superkraft/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689162/android-tipps/neue-samsung-smartphones-verfuegen-ueber-eine-geheime-superkraft/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:19:24 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🤖 Android Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Samsung könnte das größte Problem von Falt-Smartphones mit einer neuen Titan-Technologie gelöst haben.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[How to navigate the AI talent wars]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Cloudflare recently beat Q1 2026 earnings. Revenue up 34% year over year. EPS ahead of consensus. Full-year guidance raised. Then, in the same breath, they announced 1,100 layoffs, 20% of the company. CEO Matthew Prince’s explanation: “The way we work at Cloudflare has fundamentally changed.”



...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689121/it-nachrichten/how-to-navigate-the-ai-talent-wars/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689121/it-nachrichten/how-to-navigate-the-ai-talent-wars/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:06:19 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
		<div class="grid grid--cols-10@md grid--cols-8@lg article-column">
					  <div class="col-12 col-10@md col-6@lg col-start-3@lg">
						<div class="article-column__content">
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/cloudflare-net-q1-earnings-revenues-230528107.html">Cloudflare recently beat Q1 2026 earnings</a>. Revenue up 34% year over year. EPS ahead of consensus. Full-year guidance raised. Then, in the same breath, they announced 1,100 layoffs, 20% of the company. CEO Matthew Prince’s explanation: “The way we work at Cloudflare has fundamentally changed.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/block-q1-earnings-beat-strong-144200216.html">Block did the same thing</a>. Beat guidance, raised outlook, cut 4,000+ jobs. Both framed it as architecting for the AI era.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is not a contradiction. This is the new math boards are running. And if you’re a CIO who hasn’t started running it yourself, <a href="mailto:https://www.cio.com/article/4077996/cios-be-ready-for-agentic-ai-or-be-out-of-a-job.html">you’re behind</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The benchmark has moved</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-native companies have quietly reset what “efficient” means for a technology organization. Midjourney generates over $500M in revenue with roughly 160 employees, over $3M per head. Anthropic hit a $14B annualized run rate in early 2026 with fewer than 3,000 employees. Across the top AI-native startups, <a href="mailto:https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulbaier/2026/03/31/ai-native-firms-lead-in-revenue-per-employee/">the average revenue per employee is $3.48M</a>, nearly twelve times the traditional SaaS benchmark of $300K.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="mailto:https://www.saastr.com/what-to-do-if-your-business-decelerates/">Boards aren’t comparing you to your 2019 self anymore</a>. They’re comparing you to Anthropic.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the pressure Cloudflare and Block are responding to. They’re not cutting people because the business is struggling. They’re cutting because investors have internalized a new denominator. Headcount is no longer a proxy for capacity; it’s a liability on the efficiency ratio.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For CIOs, this creates a hiring problem that looks nothing like the cloud or mobile talent gaps of the past decade. Those gaps were about volume: hire 100 cloud engineers, absorb the cost, build the capability… This one is about density; you’re not looking for 100 people. You’re looking for 10 who can deliver what 100 couldn’t, and justify $1M or more in value per seat.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Finding bodies to fill seats has never been easier. Finding people who operate at that level of leverage is a different problem entirely.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">‘Acqui-hires’ are a shortcut with a hidden cost</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Companies have figured out that recruiting AI-native talent one by one is too slow and that it’s faster to buy a team. Google’s acquisition of the Windsurf founders, Meta bringing in the Scale AI team, Accenture’s string of AI-focused acquisitions: <a href="mailto:https://tomtunguz.com/ai-acqui-hire-wave/">these are acqui-hires</a> dressed up as M&amp;A. The premium on experienced AI talent is high enough, and the urgency real enough, that organizations are skipping traditional hiring loops entirely and buying their way in.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I’ve been on the other side of this. My company, MadKudu, was acquired by HG Insights specifically to bring AI-native capability into an established enterprise business. HG needed change agents who had already figured out how to build and ship in this new era, not just people who’d read about it. That’s the thesis behind most of these deals.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But there’s a cost that doesn’t show up in the acquisition price.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AI-native teams are fast because they operate with a different set of defaults: full access to tools, minimal governance layers, the ability to experiment and ship without a six-week approval cycle. That operating model is not a perk; it’s the fundamental mechanism. It’s why a team of 10 can do what an enterprise team of 100 can’t.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When you acqui-hire that team and then slot them into your existing approval processes, you’ve bought the people and killed the engine. The change agents you paid for become change-frustrated. The attrition that follows is expensive and predictable.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The harder realization: acquiring an AI-native team means accepting how they work. That requires deliberately carving out space for them to operate differently, not just tolerating it but institutionalizing it. The acquisition is an organizational change program, not just a hiring event.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The CIO’s real problem</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The governance stack most enterprise organizations run was designed for a headcount world. Every tool vetting cycle, every vendor review, every security approval was calibrated assuming you were managing a large team where consistency and control were the primary objectives.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That calculus breaks when your goal is talent density. The same approval processes that protect against data leaks are now the reason your best people can’t do their best work. When it takes six weeks to approve a tool that your competitor’s team is already shipping with, you’ve traded velocity for the perception of safety.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The practical fix is structured experimentation: clear guardrails, defined boundaries, but explicit permission to try tools before deciding whether to roll them out broadly. Gating everything prevents you from ever discovering what 10x productivity looks like.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The skills inventory question is also more nuanced than it sounds. Job titles won’t tell you where the leverage is. You need to map the actual tasks within each function and assess which can be automated or augmented with AI. That’s where you find the people who, with the right tools, become your $1M/employee talent, not because you hired differently, but because you enabled better.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is also where the build-versus-buy question gets genuinely tricky. As AI reshapes how products are built and delivered, your internal operating model — how you work, how fast you ship, how you use data — is becoming core IP. Outsourcing delivery means outsourcing the part of the organization where your competitive advantage is now being built.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Closing the gap without slowing down</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><a href="mailto:https://www.saastr.com/the-great-ai-talent-grab-the-latest-20vc-with-jason-harry-and-rory/">The AI talent wars</a> are not primarily a recruiting problem. They’re a rethinking of what organizations are supposed to look like.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Boards have a new benchmark. Cloudflare, Block, Amazon, Meta and others have already started restructuring to meet it, publicly, painfully, even while beating their numbers. The question for CIOs isn’t whether this pressure arrives; it’s whether you’re ahead of it or behind it when it does.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The organizations that navigate this well won’t win by outbidding competitors for a handful of elite engineers. They’ll win by designing operating systems that amplify the leverage of the talent they do have, by enabling their best people rather than constraining them, and by treating AI fluency as a core organizational capability rather than a niche specialization.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Talent density is the new headcount model. The sooner your governance, your tooling and your board conversations reflect that, the better positioned you’ll be when the next efficiency report lands.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.</strong><br><a href="https://www.cio.com/expert-contributor-network/"><strong>Want to join?</strong></a></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
</div></div></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Xbox's new backwards-compatible games on PC are "already Xbox 360 games" — and that changes everything about what's next]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[New details about how the four new back-compat Xbox games on PC are running lead me to believe that Xbox 360 games are on the way. I break down what appears to be going on behind the scenes and why it's a big deal for game preservation.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689104/windows-tipps/xboxs-new-backwards-compatible-games-on-pc-are-already-xbox-360-games-and-that-changes-everything-about-whats-next/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689104/windows-tipps/xboxs-new-backwards-compatible-games-on-pc-are-already-xbox-360-games-and-that-changes-everything-about-whats-next/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:02:29 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🪟 Windows Tipps</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[New details about how the four new back-compat Xbox games on PC are running lead me to believe that Xbox 360 games are on the way. I break down what appears to be going on behind the scenes and why it's a big deal for game preservation.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Microsoft hat gerade mein Lieblingsspiel aus der alten Xbox-Ära für den PC veröffentlicht]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Wir schreiben das Jahr 2003. Ich bin ein Neuntklässler und spiele auf der Original-Xbox mit einem Controller, der ungefähr so groß ist wie eine Servierplatte. Ich besitze Halo und  Dead or Alive 3 und bin von der Grafik völlig begeistert. Das nächste Spiel, das ich mir kaufe, ist Crimson Skies, e...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689084/it-nachrichten/microsoft-hat-gerade-mein-lieblingsspiel-aus-der-alten-xbox-aera-fuer-den-pc-veroeffentlicht/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689084/it-nachrichten/microsoft-hat-gerade-mein-lieblingsspiel-aus-der-alten-xbox-aera-fuer-den-pc-veroeffentlicht/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:49:25 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<section class="wp-block-bigbite-multi-title"><div class="container"></div></section>



<p>Wir schreiben das Jahr 2003. Ich bin ein Neuntklässler und spiele auf der Original-Xbox mit einem Controller, der ungefähr so groß ist wie eine Servierplatte. Ich besitze <em>Halo </em>und  <em>Dead or Alive 3</em> und bin von der Grafik völlig begeistert. Das nächste Spiel, das ich mir kaufe, ist <em>Crimson Skies</em>, ein arcadeartiges Luftkampfspiel, das alternative Geschichte mit Abenteuer-Pulp verbindet und über eine wirklich hervorragende Steuerung verfügt.</p>



<p>Seit über 20 Jahren versuche ich nun, dieses Gefühl – wenn schon nicht genau diese Erfahrung – wieder aufleben zu lassen. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">

</div></figure>



<p>Die meisten der Blockbuster-Titel aus dem ursprünglichen Xbox-Sortiment können Sie bereits jetzt auf dem PC spielen, darunter auch <em>Halo</em>, für das sowohl ein Remaster als auch ein Remake in Vorbereitung sind. Einige der eher nischenorientierten Titel waren jedoch schon seit sehr, sehr langer Zeit nicht mehr erhältlich, mit Ausnahme einiger weniger, die Sie über den Game Pass streamen können.</p>



<p>Microsoft hat beschlossen, einige dieser weniger bekannten Klassiker – und vielleicht auch ein paar, die dem Begriff „Klassiker“ nicht ganz gerecht werden – in Form vollständiger Portierungen für PC-Spieler verfügbar zu machen.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Xbox-„Klassiker“ erhalten PC-Ports</h2>



<p>Das Unternehmen nennt dies „<a href="https://news.xbox.com/en-us/2026/07/22/xbox-backward-compatibility-on-pc/">Xbox-Abwärtskompatibilität auf dem PC</a>“. Der Start erfolgt mit vier Spielen, weitere sollen in Kürze folgen. Diese Spiele laufen lokal auf Ihrem Windows-PC, offenbar ohne jegliche Emulation (oder falls eine Emulation stattfindet, wird dies nicht ausdrücklich erwähnt), wobei bestimmte Mindestsystemanforderungen gelten, darunter eine GTX 950- oder Radeon RX 550-Grafikkarte. Grundsätzlich sollte jeder PC, der in den letzten sechs oder sieben Jahren auf den Markt gekommen ist, diese Anforderungen erfüllen, einschließlich Laptops und Handhelds mit integrierter Grafik.</p>



<p>Zu den ersten Titeln gehört <em>Crimson Skies: High Road to Revenge</em>, von dem ich erst später erfuhr, dass es sich um eine ausschließlich für Konsolen veröffentlichte Fortsetzung eines früheren PC-Spiels handelt. Es kostet zehn Euro – erstaunlich günstig in einer Welt, in der Microsoft 40 Euro für eine Wieder-Wieder-Wiederveröffentlichung von <em>Skyrim </em>verlangt<em>.</em></p>



<p>Ich habe es sofort gekauft und wollte es herunterladen … doch das geht nicht, da es laut der Xbox-App für Windows nur per Streaming über den Game Pass verfügbar ist.</p>



<p>Microsoft gibt an, dass man die neueste Version des Xbox-Insider-Builds benötigt, über die ich bereits verfüge. Dies scheint eine schrittweise Einführung zu sein – ein häufiges Problem bei Funktionen, die von der Xbox-Windows-App abhängig sind. Ich bin etwas verärgert, dass ich es nicht sofort ausprobieren kann.</p>



<p>Das bedeutet auch, dass es nahezu unmöglich sein wird, das Spiel auf einem SteamOS-basierten Gerät zu spielen. Was für mich persönlich sehr schade ist, <a href="https://www.pcwelt.de/article/3194800/steam-machine-im-praxistest-ganz-nett-aber-leider-enttaeuschend.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">da ich gerade erst eine Steam Machine gekauft habe</a>. Ich werde diesen Artikel aktualisieren, sobald ich das Spiel zum Laufen gebracht habe.</p>


<div class="extendedBlock-wrapper block-coreImage undefined"><figure data-wp-context='{"imageId":"6a620da47251c"}' data-wp-interactive="core/image" class="wp-block-image size-large wp-lightbox-container"><img decoding="async" data-wp-class--hide="state.isContentHidden" data-wp-class--show="state.isContentVisible" data-wp-init="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-on-async--load="callbacks.setButtonStyles" data-wp-on-async-window--resize="callbacks.setButtonStyles" src="https://b2c-contenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/image_552da1.png?w=1200" alt="ROG Xbox Ally X playing Crimson Skies" class="wp-image-3197144" width="1200" height="675" loading="lazy"><button class="lightbox-trigger" type="button" aria-haspopup="dialog" aria-label="Enlarge" data-wp-init="callbacks.initTriggerButton" data-wp-on-async--click="actions.showLightbox" data-wp-style--right="state.imageButtonRight" data-wp-style--top="state.imageButtonTop">
				<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="12" height="12" fill="none" viewbox="0 0 12 12">
					<path fill="#fff" d="M2 0a2 2 0 0 0-2 2v2h1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 1 .5-.5h2V0H2Zm2 10.5H2a.5.5 0 0 1-.5-.5V8H0v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h2v-1.5ZM8 12v-1.5h2a.5.5 0 0 0 .5-.5V8H12v2a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H8Zm2-12a2 2 0 0 1 2 2v2h-1.5V2a.5.5 0 0 0-.5-.5H8V0h2Z"></path>
				</svg>
			</button></figure><p class="imageCredit">Microsoft</p></div>



<p>Die weiteren Titel sind <em>Blinx: The Time Sweeper</em>, einer der frühen Versuche, der Xbox ein Maskottchen-Plattformspiel zu geben, <em>Conker: Live &amp; Reloaded</em>, ein Remake des N64-Kuriosums <em>Conker’s Bad Fur Day</em>, das<em> </em>nach der Übernahme von Rare durch Microsoft entstand, sowie das extrem für die 2000er Jahre typische Partyspiel <em>Fusion Frenzy</em>. Alle vier waren Teil von Microsofts anfänglicher Veröffentlichungsoffensive für die Xbox, und <em>Blinx </em>sowie<em> Crimson Skies </em>sind zudem über den Game Pass verfügbar.</p>



<p>Ich bin mir sicher, dass es vielen PC-Spielern genauso geht wie mir und sie an mindestens eines dieser Spiele schöne Erinnerungen haben. Insbesondere <em>Blinx</em> bot einige sehr interessante Spielkonzepte, die auf älteren Konsolen nicht möglich waren – ermöglicht durch die interne 8-GB-Festplatte der Xbox, ein entscheidender Unterschied zur Playstation 2 und anderen Konsolen. Weitere Spiele sollen angeblich in Zukunft in die Xbox-Abwärtskompatibilität aufgenommen werden, wobei nicht genau angegeben wurde, um welche es sich dabei handelt.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Tiefgreifende Probleme bei Xbox bleiben bestehen</h2>



<p>Doch ich fürchte, ich muss die Stimmung hier zum Schluss etwas trüben. Die Xbox als Plattform und als Geschäftsbereich von Microsoft befindet sich in einer prekären Lage: Sie kann im Wettbewerb mit der Playstation nicht mithalten, wird von Valve mit Steam und SteamOS unter Druck gesetzt und entlässt Tausende von Mitarbeitern aus ihrem riesigen, kostspieligen Bestand an Entwicklern und Publishern. Xbox muss dringend Spieler zurückgewinnen, die nach den massiven Preiserhöhungen für den Game Pass und die Xbox-Hardware möglicherweise zögern, der Plattform noch zu vertrauen.</p>



<p>Diese nostalgischen Neuzugänge für den PC folgen kurz nach Gerüchten über ein neues <em>Fallout-</em>Spiel des bei Fans beliebten Entwicklers (und der Microsoft-Tochter) Obsidian, der stark von Entlassungen betroffen war. Es liegt nahe, beide Schritte als Versuch zu betrachten, das Ruder herumzureißen und/oder die Spieler dazu zu bringen, die tiefgreifenden Probleme innerhalb von Xbox und Microsoft insgesamt zu vergessen. Dazu wird es jedoch mehr als eine 23 Jahre alte Portierung brauchen.</p>

</div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Poolside's Laguna S 2.1 is a small open-weight coding model that punches well above its size]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Poolside has released Laguna S 2.1, its third coding model in three months. Rather than rely on raw scale, the company trained it to keep checking its work, revise failed approaches, and avoid giving up too soon during long agentic sessions. The compact model beats several much larger rivals in b...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689056/ai-nachrichten/poolsides-laguna-s-21-is-a-small-open-weight-coding-model-that-punches-well-above-its-size/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689056/ai-nachrichten/poolsides-laguna-s-21-is-a-small-open-weight-coding-model-that-punches-well-above-its-size/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:36:22 +0200</pubDate>
<category>🔧 AI Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="2048" height="1152" src="https://the-decoder.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Poolside-Logo-Wall-generated-image-nano-banana-pro.png" class="attachment-full size-full wp-post-image" alt="White 3D cubes in hexagonal frames on a purple background symbolize modular interconnectivity and digital structure." decoding="async" fetchpriority="high"></p>
<p>        Poolside has released Laguna S 2.1, its third coding model in three months. Rather than rely on raw scale, the company trained it to keep checking its work, revise failed approaches, and avoid giving up too soon during long agentic sessions. The compact model beats several much larger rivals in benchmarks. Poolside says it also solved a math problem that had been open since 1975 for under 10 cents.</p>
<p>The article <a href="https://the-decoder.com/poolsides-laguna-s-2-1-is-a-small-open-weight-coding-model-that-punches-well-above-its-size/">Poolside's Laguna S 2.1 is a small open-weight coding model that punches well above its size</a> appeared first on <a href="https://the-decoder.com/">The Decoder</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Bosch im Amzon-Deal: Dieser Akku-Schlagbohrschrauber kommt im riesigen Zubehör-Set]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Bei Amazon gibt es derzeit einen leistungsstarken Bosch-Akku-Schlagbohrschrauber zu einem stark reduzierten Preis. Das umfangreiche Set bietet Heimwerkern eine solide Grundlage für zahlreiche Projekte im eigenen Zuhause.]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3689050/it-nachrichten/bosch-im-amzon-deal-dieser-akku-schlagbohrschrauber-kommt-im-riesigen-zubehoer-set/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3689050/it-nachrichten/bosch-im-amzon-deal-dieser-akku-schlagbohrschrauber-kommt-im-riesigen-zubehoer-set/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:34:56 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Bei Amazon gibt es derzeit einen leistungsstarken Bosch-Akku-Schlagbohrschrauber zu einem stark reduzierten Preis. Das umfangreiche Set bietet Heimwerkern eine solide Grundlage für zahlreiche Projekte im eigenen Zuhause.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Panzer Corps 2: Elite - All American DLC – Yay or Nay (PC)]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[Airborne troops are all about surprise and speed. They are also uniquely vulnerable in their transport planes and gliders. Add the fact that they need a turn on the ground before they get to actually act, and it becomes clear that executing an airborne assault is a complex and risky job.

World W...]]></description>
<link>https://tsecurity.de/de/3688954/it-security-nachrichten/panzer-corps-2-elite-all-american-dlc-yay-or-nay-pc/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://tsecurity.de/de/3688954/it-security-nachrichten/panzer-corps-2-elite-all-american-dlc-yay-or-nay-pc/</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 13:59:25 +0200</pubDate>
<category>📰 IT Security Nachrichten</category>
<source url="https://tsecurity.de">tsecurity.de</source>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Airborne troops are all about surprise and speed. They are also uniquely vulnerable in their transport planes and gliders. Add the fact that they need a turn on the ground before they get to actually act, and it becomes clear that executing an airborne assault is a complex and risky job.

World War II commanders learned this the hard way, and I only marginally avoided having to do the same. Pushing for a bonus objective is a good idea when you have a decent chance of getting it. But, trying to improve my abilities for future missions, I spread my force too thin. Now I have an under-strength force moving toward Niscemi, and I need to scramble reinforcements to deal with a Tiger.

The 82nd Airborne has five turns to destroy the tank. Thankfully, it lacks any infantry support. Unfortunately, my own armor is limited. So, heavy weapons United States infantry, and Wolverines will have to destroy it, which means I will take losses. Moving faster to secure victory points ear...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- Generated in 1,63ms -->